alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.923 Packing materials and containers for shipment.

(a) *Effect on tariff shift rule.* Packing materials and containers for shipment, as defined in § 10.913(m) of this subpart, are to be disregarded in determining whether the non-originating materials used in the production of the good undergo an applicable change in tariff classification set out in General Note 32(n), HTSUS. Accordingly, such materials and containers are not required to undergo the applicable change in tariff classification even if they are non-originating.

(b) *Effect on regional value content calculation.* Packing materials and containers for shipment, as defined in § 10.913(m) of this subpart, are to be disregarded in determining the regional value content of a good imported into the United States. Accordingly, in applying the build-down, build-up, or net cost method for determining the regional value content of a good imported into the United States, the value of such packing materials and containers for shipment (whether originating or non-originating) is disregarded and not included in AV, adjusted value, VNM, value of non-originating materials, VOM, value of originating materials, or NC, net cost of a good.

# Example.

Peruvian producer A produces good C. Producer A ships good C to the United States in a shipping container that it purchased from Company B in Peru. The shipping container is originating. The value of the shipping container determined under section § 10.916(a)(2) of this subpart is $3. Good C is subject to a regional value content requirement. The transaction value of good C is $100, which includes the $3 shipping container. The U.S. importer decides to use the build-up method, RVC = (VOM/AV) × 100 (*see* § 10.915(c) of this subpart), in determining whether good C satisfies the regional value content requirement. In determining the AV, adjusted value, of good C imported into the U.S., paragraph (b) of this section and the definition of AV require a $3 deduction for the value of the shipping container. Therefore, the AV is $97 ($100 − $3). In addition, the value of the shipping container is disregarded and not included in the VOM, value of originating materials.
EXHIBIT 32.2: CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
   1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      In connection with the accompanying Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Magna-Lab, Inc. for the quarter and six months ended August 31, 2006, the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

      (1)   such Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter and six months
            ended August 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of
            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in such Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
            for the quarter and six months ended August 31, 2006 fairly
            presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
            results of operations of Magna-Lab, Inc.


October 13, 2006      /s/ Kenneth C. Riscica
                      ----------------------------------------------------------
                      Name: Kenneth C. Riscica
                      Title: Treasurer & Secretary (principal financial officer)
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

I, Alan D. Feldman, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Midas, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Alan D. Feldman                            
|Alan D. Feldman                                
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: March 20, 2009                           

I, William M. Guzik, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Midas, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ William M. Guzik        
|William M. Guzik            
|Executive Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer     
|Date: March 20, 2009
§ 19.420 Access to schools operated by LEAs. A recipient that is a local educational agency shall not, on the basis of sex, exclude any person from admission to: ( a ) Any institution of vocational education operated by such recipient; or
( b ) Any other school or educational unit operated by such recipient, unless such recipient otherwise makes available to such person, pursuant to the same policies and criteria of admission, courses, services, and facilities comparable to each course, service, and facility offered in or through such schools.
Exhibit 32


    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         OF TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC.
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in the capacity indicated below,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with this Annual Report on Form 10-K, that:

    1.  the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

    2.  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of
        operations, as of the dates and for the periods presented in the
        financial statements included in such report.





/s/ Michael R. Sand                         /s/ Dean J. Brydon
----------------------------                ---------------------------
Michael R. Sand                             Dean J. Brydon
Chief Executive Officer                     Chief Financial Officer


Dated: December 11, 2009

<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

BRUCE A. HILER, as Trustee of BRUCE A. §

HILER DELAWARE QPRT and ELAINE §

M. CACHERIS, as Trustee of the ELAINE § No. 576, 2014

M. CACHERIS DELAWARE QPRT, §

§

Respondents/Counterclaim and §

Third-Party Plaintiffs Below, § Court Below:

Appellants, §

§

v. § Court of Chancery of the

§ State of Delaware

PAUL G. KUHNS and ANNE M. KUHNS, §

§ C. A. No. 7586-VCG

Petitioners/Counterclaim §

Defendants Below, §

Appellees, §

§

and §

§

THE CITY OF REHOBOTH BEACH, §

a municipal corporation of the State of §

Delaware, and GREGORY FERRESE, in §

his capacity as the City Manager of the City §

of Rehoboth Beach, §

§

Third-Party Defendants Below, §

Appellees. §

Submitted: June 17, 2015

Decided: July 6, 2015

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN and SEITZ, Justices.

O R D E R

This 6

th day of July 2015, the Court, having considered this matter on the 

briefs and the oral arguments of the parties, and having concluded that the same 
2

should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of 

Chancery in its Memorandum Opinion dated March 31, 2014, its Order entering 

summary judgment dated May 28, 2014, and its Order of Final Judgment pursuant 

to Court of Chancery Rule 54(b) dated September 11, 2014.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgments of the 

Court of Chancery be, and the same hereby are, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

 Justice
#### §§ 123.33-123.34 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 654 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 654

  To reauthorize the Blue Ridge National Heritage Area, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 2021

 Mr. Burr (for himself and Mr. Tillis) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reauthorize the Blue Ridge National Heritage Area, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Blue Ridge National Heritage Area 
Reauthorization Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE BLUE RIDGE NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA.

    The Blue Ridge National Heritage Area Act of 2003 (54 U.S.C. 320101 
note; Public Law 108-108; 117 Stat. 1274; 131 Stat. 461; 132 Stat. 661; 
133 Stat. 778) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (i)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
        to carry out this section $1,000,000 for each fiscal year.''; 
        and
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``subsection 
                (a)'' and inserting ``paragraph (1)''; and
            (2) in subsection (j), by striking ``2021'' and inserting 
        ``2036''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


              CAMBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS (MASSACHUSETTS), INC.
              STAEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (in thousands, except per share data)
                                  (unaudited)


                                                    Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                           2000       1999
                                                        --------    -------

 Net loss                                               $(21,236)   $(4,275)
                                                        =========   ========

 Basic:
  Weighted average number of common shares outstanding    63,312     62,270
                                                        =========   ========

  Net loss per share                                    $   (.34)   $  (.07)
                                                        =========   ========

 Diluted:
  Weighted average number of common shares outstanding    63,312     62,270
  Dilutive effects of stock options                            -          -
                                                        ---------   --------
  Weighted average number of common and
    common equivalent shares outstanding                  63,312     62,270
                                                        =========   ========

  Net loss per share                                    $   (.34)   $  (.07)
                                                        =========   ========
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,569,955
<SECURITIES>                                10,482,876
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,695,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                   110,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,490,041
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,627,511
<PP&E>                                      16,938,467
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,138,249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,466,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,839,231
<BONDS>                                      8,740,042
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       197,385
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,571,981
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,466,414
<SALES>                                      4,562,645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,562,645
<CGS>                                        5,649,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,606,107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (203,815)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,245
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             529,635
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,026,047)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,026,047)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,026,047)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.66)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 206.61 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to identify the forms of assistance which may be made available under an emergency declaration.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Consent of KPMG LLP**

 

The Board of Directors 

Midas, Inc.: 

 

We consent toincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-44625, 333-44797, 333-58363, 333-42196, 333-74094, 333-89226, and 333-101559 on Form S-8 of Midas, Inc. of our report dated March 27, 2003 relating to the balance sheets of Midas, Inc. asof the end of fiscal years 2002 and 2001, and the related statements of operations, cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equity for each of the fiscal years 2002, 2001 and 2000, which report appears in the Midas, Inc. Annual Report on Form10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2002. 

 

Chicago, Illinois 

September 9, 2003
§ 122.165 Air cabotage. ( a ) The air cabotage law (49 U.S.C. 41703) prohibits the transportation of persons, property, or mail for compensation or hire between points of the U.S. in a foreign civil aircraft. The term “foreign civil aircraft” includes all aircraft that are not of U.S. registration except those foreign-registered aircraft leased or chartered to a U.S. air carrier and operated under the authority of regulations issued by the Department of Transportation, as provided for in 14 CFR 121.153, and those aircraft used exclusively in the service of any government.
( b ) Customs officers detecting possible violations shall report the matter to Headquarters, Attention: Entry Procedures and Carriers Branch. Liability should not be assessed under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 463 pending instructions from Headquarters since certain limited domestic transportation by foreign civil aircraft is permitted under regulations issued by the Department of Transportation.
[T.D. 88-12, 53 FR 9292, Mar. 22, 1988, as amended by T.D. 98-74, 63 FR 51289, Sept. 25, 1998; T.D. 99-27, 64 FR 13675, Mar. 22, 1999]
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Bicycling in the Badlands

Badlands National Park
### §2186. Square 580 landscape maintenance

For fiscal year 2016 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Architect of the Capitol, in consultation with the District of Columbia, is authorized to maintain and improve the landscape features, excluding streets, in Square 580 up to the beginning of I–395.

(Pub. L. 114–113, div. I, title II, §206, Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2672.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation act:

Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title II, §206, Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2542.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

PLAINTIFF

VS.

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 55 

PUBLIC SQUARE, CLEVELAND, 

OHIO, WITH ALL 

APPURTENANCES, 

IMPROVEMENTS, AND 

ATTACHMENTS THEREON, AND 

ANY RIGHT TO COLLECT AND 

RECEIVE ANY PROFIT, RENT, 

INCOME, AND PROCEEDS 

THEREFROM

DEFENDANT.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO: 1:20-CV-23278

(Formerly Case No: 1:20-CV-25313)

JUDGE MARCIA G. COOKE

RESPONSE TO MOTION TO 

CLARIFY

Claimant, Law Offices of Cleveland, Inc, (hereinafter “LOC”), hereby offers this short 

response to the Plaintiff’s Motion to Clarify filed on March 19, 2021. See case number 1:20-CV23278 [DE 65]. On February 24, 2021, the Court ordered for the consolidation of case number 1:20-

CV-25313 with lower case numbered 1:20-CV-23278. See case number 1:20-CV-25313 [DE 29]. 

Additionally, the Order [DE 29] vacated all previous orders, which would presumably include the 

order of sale of the real property at issue in this case. If the sale order was vacated inadvertently, 

then LOC has no objection to a correction of the record. 

Notwithstanding any correction to the record, LOC maintains that it does not consent to the 

sale of the real property at issue in this matter, and that the original order did not comply with Rule 

Case 1:20-cv-23278-MGC Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/02/2021 Page 1 of 3
2

G(7)(b) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions. 

Thus, Claimant is preserving this issue for appeal and is requesting that any consent to a correction 

of the record not be interpreted as a consent to the interlocutory order granting the sale of real

property at issue in this matter.

Claimant has no further response if the order to vacate the sale was done for reasons other 

than as discussed above. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Jonathan D. Carvajal

Jonathan Carvajal, Esq.

GREGORY E. GUDIN P.A. 

10180 Sweet Bay Court

Parkland, FL 33076

(786) 348-9267

ggudin@gudinlaw.com

Case 1:20-cv-23278-MGC Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/02/2021 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 2, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the 

Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day 

on all counsel of record in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic 

Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not 

authorized to receive Notices of Filing electronically.

By: /s/ Jonathan D. Carvajal

Jonathan Carvajal, Esq.

GREGORY E. GUDIN P.A. 

10180 Sweet Bay Court

Parkland, FL 33076

(305) 796-5103

jd@manraraandassociates.com

ggudin@gudinlaw.com

Case 1:20-cv-23278-MGC Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/02/2021 Page 3 of 3
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00392-CV

Ryan Sanders and all Occupants

v.

Stephen W. Dean

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2019CCV-60944-5

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellants, Ryan Sanders and all Occupants, although they are exempt from payment 

due to their inability to pay costs. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 26, 2019
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.1011 Filing procedures. ( a ) *Place of filing.* A post-importation claim for a refund must be filed with CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically.
( b ) *Contents of claim.* A post-importation claim for a refund must be filed by presentation of the following: ( 1 ) A written or electronic declaration or statement stating that the good was an originating good at the time of importation and setting forth the number and date of the entry or entries covering the good;
( 2 ) A copy of a written or electronic certification prepared in accordance with § 10.1004 of this subpart if a certification forms the basis for the claim, or other information demonstrating that the good qualifies for preferential tariff treatment;
( 3 ) A written statement indicating whether the importer of the good provided a copy of the entry summary or equivalent documentation to any other person. If such documentation was so provided, the statement must identify each recipient by name, CBP identification number, and address and must specify the date on which the documentation was provided; and
( 4 ) A written statement indicating whether or not any person has filed a protest relating to the good under any provision of law; and if any such protest has been filed, the statement must identify the protest by number and date.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.235 Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment. ( a ) *Declaration.* In connection with a claim for preferential tariff treatment for an article described in § 10.233(a)(1) through (5), the importer must make a written declaration that the article qualifies for that treatment. The written declaration should be made by including on the entry summary, or equivalent documentation, the symbol “R” as a prefix to the subheading of the HTSUS under which the article in question is classified. Except in any of the circumstances described in § 10.236(d)(1), the declaration required under this paragraph must be based on a complete and properly executed original Certificate of Origin that covers the article being imported and that is in the possession of the importer.
( b ) *Corrected declaration.* If, after making the declaration required under paragraph (a) of this section, the importer has reason to believe that a Certificate of Origin on which a declaration was based contains information that is not correct, the importer must within 30 calendar days after the date of discovery of the error make a corrected declaration and pay any duties that may be due. A corrected declaration will be effected by submission of a letter or other written statement to CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically.