alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

Case No.: 20-23130-CIV-ALTONAGA/Goodman

JOSE CAMINAS, and other similarly 

situated individuals 

Plaintiff,

v.

COL 323 CORP d/b/a THE CLOSET 

FACTORY, CARMEN ROLDAN 

and CELESTINO ROLDAN, 

Defendants.

 

 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff, JOSE CAMINAS and the Defendants, COL 323 CORP d/b/a THE CLOSET 

FACTORY, CARMEN ROLDAN and CELESTINO ROLDAN, (the “Parties”) by and through their 

undersigned counsel, hereby notify the Court that the instant action has settled. Accordingly, the 

Parties expect to file a stipulation of dismissal within fourteen (14) days and should not be required 

to file any further responses, motions, and/or pleadings.

The stipulation of dismissal will be effective subject to the entry by the Court of an order

retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement, and contingent upon the 

Court’s determination that the settlement agreement is a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona 

fide dispute over FLSA provisions.

Dated: September 29, 2020. 

Case 1:20-cv-23130-CMA Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Yadhira Ramírez-Toro

Yadhira Ramírez-Toro (FBN: 120506)

E-mail: yramirez@saenzanderson.com

SAENZ & ANDERSON, PLLC 

20900 NE 30th Avenue, Ste. 800 

Aventura, Florida, 33180 

Telephone: (305) 503-5131 

Facsimile: (888) 270-5549 

Counsel for Plaintiff

PECKAR & ABRAMSON, P.C.

One Southeast Third Avenue

Suite 3100

Miami, FL 33131

Telephone: 305-358-2600

Facsimile: 305-375-0328

By: Anne-Solenne Rolland

Freddy X. Muñoz

Florida Bar No.: 108242

fmunoz@pecklaw.com

Anne-Solenne Rolland

Florida Bar No.: 99631

arolland@pecklaw.com

Counsel for Defendants 

Case 1:20-cv-23130-CMA Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2020 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****Annual report FY...**
 
2002 | 2005
 
SuDoc:ID 1.27:L 29/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000638121
 
October 31, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 20-61588-CIV-ALTMAN/Hunt 

LUZ MARTINEZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TOTAL SOLUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC., et al., 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/ 

ORDER

 To better manage the orderly progress of the case, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 

The Plaintiff(s) in this case shall file proof of service, as to each Defendant, within seven days of 

perfecting service of each Defendant. The Defendants shall file their responses and motions jointly. 

When responding to the Complaint, the Defendants shall file either a joint motion or separate 

answers within the time remaining for the last-served Defendant to respond. 

If conflicts of position exist, the Defendants shall file a motion for leave to file separate 

responses, in which they will describe what those conflicts are. If the Defendants need more than 

twenty pages for their responses, they shall file a motion for leave to file excess pages, which the 

Court will entertain on an expedited basis. 

Failure to comply with these procedures may result in sanctions, including the striking of 

the motion(s) or response(s). 

Case 0:20-cv-61588-RKA Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2020 Page 1 of 2
2 

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 10th day of August 2020. 

 _________________________________ 

 ROY K. ALTMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record 

Case 0:20-cv-61588-RKA Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2020 Page 2 of 2
§ 115.64 Plan review. ( a ) A manufacturer or owner who wants road vehicles to be approved by design type must submit the plans and specifications of the road vehicles to the Certifying Authority.
( b ) The Certifying Authority that examines the plans and specifications submitted in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section shall: ( 1 ) Approve the plans and specifications in accordance with the requirements of § 115.65 and arrange to inspect a road vehicle in accordance with § 115.66; or
( 2 ) Advise the applicant of any necessary changes to be made for compliance with the requirements of § 115.65.
( c ) If changes in design of the road vehicle are made during production but after approval of the plans and specifications by the Certifying Authority, the manufacturer shall immediately notify the Certifying Authority and furnish it with “as-built” drawings of the road vehicle so that the plans can be reviewed and one or more road vehicles inspected during the production stage to confirm that they continue to comply with the requirements of § 115.65.
### §5323. Pay of clerical assistants as affected by death of Senator or Representative

When a Senator 1 or Member of the House of Representatives or Delegate or Resident Commissioner dies during his term of office the clerical assistants appointed by him, and then borne upon the pay rolls of the Senate or House of Representatives, shall be continued on such pay rolls in their respective positions and be paid for a period not longer than one month: Provided, That this shall not apply to clerical assistants of standing committees of the Senate or House of Representatives, when their service otherwise would continue beyond such period.

(Feb. 23, 1927, ch. 168, §1, 44 Stat. 1148.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 92a of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Inapplicability to Employees of Senate

Pub. L. 98–473, title I, §123A(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1969, provided that this section shall not apply to any employee of the Senate.

1 See Inapplicability to Employees of Senate note below.
### §3192. Definitions

In this part:

#### (1) Applicable local board

The term "applicable local board" means a local board—

(A) that provides information for a Job Corps center on local employment opportunities and the job skills needed to obtain the opportunities; and

(B) that serves communities in which the graduates of the Job Corps center seek employment.

#### (2) Applicable one-stop center

The term "applicable one-stop center" means a one-stop center that provides services, such as referral, assessment, recruitment, and placement, to support the purposes of the Job Corps.

#### (3) Enrollee

The term "enrollee" means an individual who has voluntarily applied for, been selected for, and enrolled in the Job Corps program, and remains with the program, but has not yet become a graduate.

#### (4) Former enrollee

The term "former enrollee" means an individual who has voluntarily applied for, been selected for, and enrolled in the Job Corps program, but left the program prior to becoming a graduate.

#### (5) Graduate

The term "graduate" means an individual who has voluntarily applied for, been selected for, and enrolled in the Job Corps program and who, as a result of participation in the Job Corps program, has received a secondary school diploma or recognized equivalent, or completed the requirements of a career and technical education and training program that prepares individuals for employment leading to economic self-sufficiency or entrance into postsecondary education or training.

#### (6) Job Corps

The term "Job Corps" means the Job Corps described in section 3193 of this title.

#### (7) Job Corps center

The term "Job Corps center" means a center described in section 3197 of this title.

#### (8) Operator

The term "operator" means an entity selected under this part to operate a Job Corps center.

#### (9) Region

The term "region" means an area defined by the Secretary.

#### (10) Service provider

The term "service provider" means an entity selected under this part to provide services described in this part to a Job Corps center.

(Pub. L. 113–128, title I, §142, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1538.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
NOTE

         This AGREEMENT made this 30th day of June, 2000,

                             BETWEEN

                         PRINT DATA CORP.
  the Corporation, having its principal offices at 43 Brunswick
  Avenue, Hopelawn, New Jersey, Hereinafter referred to as the
  "Company";
                               AND
                         WILLIAM DOEHLER
  residing at 21 Southside Ave, Atlantic Highlands, NJ, hereinafter
  referred to as "Doehler".

       WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to enter into a Note, it is
  agreed as follows:

       1.   The Undersigned, William Doehler, hereby agrees to pay
  to the order of Print Data Corp. the sum of Three hundred thirty-
  one thousand, three hundred eight-two dollars and two cents
  ($331.382.02).

       2.   Said  payment shall be made at the office of Print
  Data Corp. or such other place as the Corporation designates, by
  semi-annual payments of Twenty-four thousand, one hundred
  fourteen dollars and fifty-four cents ($24,114.54) commencing
  December 31, 2000 and continuing semi-annually for an additional
  nineteen (19) payments, until said Note is paid and satisfied in
  full, the last payment due on June 30, 2010.  The within Note
  shall bear interest at the rate of 7.75% per annum.

  /s/Mary Himelstein                      /s/William Doehler
  -----------------------------           --------------------------
     As to William Doehler                       William Doehler


<PAGE>
Exhibit 53

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-54 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 1 of 2
FREEBORN & PETERS LLP 

JASON P. STEARNS 

Partner 

FREEBORN & PETERS LLP 

Attorneys at Law 

One Tampa City Center 

201 North Franklin Street, Suite 3550 

Tampa, FL 33602 

(813) 488-2926 direct 

jstearns@freeborn.com 

wwwJreeborn.com 

February 24, 2020 

T. Vann Pearce 

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 

Columbia Center 

1152 15th Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005-1706 

Re: Carnival's Request for Audit 

Dear Mr. Pearce: 

VIA E-MAIL AND CERTIFIED MAIL, 

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

NO. 7015 1730 0001 8691 9181 

We are in receipt of your letter of February 20, 2020, requesting an audit under Section 3.4 of 

the July 24, 2014, Master Service Agreement ("MSA"). Section 3.4 of the MSA does not provide 

for your requested audit. Accordingly, at this time DeCurtis declines the requested audit. 

Decurtis will consider an audit under more confined terms. For example, your current 

request extends beyond the bounds of the MSA to include any device or system that uses Bluetooth 

Low Energy. Further, just as DeCurtis has maintained and still does maintain the confidentiality of 

Carnival's Confidential Information, DeCurtis must maintain the confidentiality of information from 

third parties whose information you have requested. DeCurtis is unable to agree to any audit that 

would require DeCurtis to improperly disclose confidential information to an auditor. 

We also wish to remind you that Section 4.4 of the MSA allows Decurtis the "unencumbered 

right to use general knowledge, know how, experience or the skill (and for the avoidance of doubt 

without the aid of written materials of any type produced in connection herewith) gained while 

providing Services under [the MSA] for the purpose of executing projects for other [Decurtis] 

clients." In providing services to DeCurtis' clients, Decurtis has maintained the confidentiality of 

any Carnival Confidential Information provided under the MSA. 

Sincerely, 

JPS:ck 

[Signed in Jason P. Stearns' absence to avoid delay] 

Chicago, IL• New York, NY• Richmond, VA• Springfield, IL• Tampa, FL 

CARN IVAL00015237 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-54 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 2 of 2
§ 111.92 Notice of monetary penalty. ( a ) *Pre-penalty notice.* If assessment of a monetary penalty under § 111.91 is contemplated, CBP will issue a written notice which advises the broker or other person of the allegations or complaints against him and explains that the broker or other person has a right to respond to the allegations or complaints in writing within 30 days of the date of mailing of the notice. The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer has discretion to provide additional time for good cause.
( b ) *Penalty notice.* If the broker or other person files a timely response to the written notice of the allegations or complaints, the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeiture Officer will review this response and will either cancel the case, issue a notice of penalty in an amount which is lower than that provided for in the written notice of allegations or complaints or issue a notice of penalty in the same amount as that provided in the written notice of allegations or complaints. If no response is received from the broker or other person, the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer will issue a notice of penalty in the same amount as that provided in the written notice of allegations or complaints.
[T.D. 00-57, 65 FR 53575, Sept. 5, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63321, Oct. 18, 2022]
### §2042. Senate Restaurants; management by Architect of the Capitol

Effective August 1, 1961, the management of the Senate Restaurants and all matters connected therewith, heretofore under the direction of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, shall be under the direction of the Architect of the Capitol under such rules and regulations as the Architect may prescribe for the operation and the employment of necessary assistance for the conduct of said restaurants by such business methods as may produce the best results consistent with economical and modern management, subject to the approval of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration as to matters of general policy: Provided, That the management of the Senate Restaurants by the Architect of the Capitol shall cease and the restaurants revert from the jurisdiction of the Architect of the Capitol to the jurisdiction of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration upon adoption by that committee of a resolution ordering such transfer of jurisdiction at any time hereafter. The provisions of section 5104(c) of title 40, except for the provisions relating to solicitation, shall not apply to any activity carried out pursuant to this section, subject to the approval of such activities by the Committee on Rules and Administration.

(Pub. L. 87–82, §1, July 6, 1961, 75 Stat. 199; Pub. L. 106–57, title I, §5, Sept. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 412.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Section 5104(c) of title 40" substituted in text for "section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d)" on authority of Pub. L. 107–217, §5(c), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1303, the first section of which enacted Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works.

Section was classified to section 174j–1 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–57 inserted at end: "The provisions of section 193d of this title, except for the provisions relating to solicitation, shall not apply to any activity carried out pursuant to this section, subject to the approval of such activities by the Committee on Rules and Administration."
EXHIBIT 32.2: CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
   1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      In connection with the accompanying Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Magna-Lab, Inc. for the quarter and six months ended August 31, 2008, the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

            (1)   such Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter and six
                  months ended August 31, 2008 fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   the information contained in such Quarterly report on Form
                  10-Q for the quarter and six months ended August 31, 2008
                  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                  condition and results of operations of Magna-Lab, Inc.


  October 17, 2008    /s/ Kenneth C. Riscica
                      ----------------------------------------------------------
                      Name: Kenneth C. Riscica
                      Title: Treasurer & Secretary (principal financial officer)
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-039 March 17, 2000

NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING

ON ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the opportunity for an evidentiary hearing

on a request for renewal of the operating license for Unit 1 of the Arkansas Nuclear One nuclear power

plant, near Russellville. It is operated by Entergy Operations, Inc.

Entergy is seeking a 20-year extension of the current Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 1 license,

which expires on May 20, 2014. The NRC staff has begun reviewing both safety and environmental

aspects of the application and plans to develop an environmental impact statement.

The deadline for hearing requests is April 3. By that time, petitions must be filed by anyone

whose interest might be affected by the license renewal and who wishes to participate as a party to the

proceeding.

Petitions for a hearing must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.

They may also be delivered to the NRC Public Document Room at 2120 L Street N.W. in Washington,

D.C. A copy of the petition should also be sent to the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, and to Craig G. Anderson, Vice President,

Operations, Arkansas Nuclear One, Entergy Operations, 1448 SR 333, Russellville, Arkansas, 72801.

More information about the opportunity for hearing may be found in a Federal Register notice

published on March 3.

###
#### § 122.161 In general.

Except as provided in subpart S of this part, any person who violates any Customs requirements stated in this part, or any regulation that applies to aircraft under § 122.2, is, in addition to any other applicable penalty, subject to civil penalty of $5,000 as provided by 19 U.S.C. 1644 and 1644a, except for overages, and failure to manifest narcotics or marihuana, in which cases the penalties set forth in section 584, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1584) apply, or for failure to report arrival or to present the documents required by § 122.27(c) of this part in which cases the penalties set forth in section 436, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1436) apply, and any aircraft used in connection with any such violation shall be subject to seizure and forfeiture, as provided for in the Customs laws. A penalty or forfeiture may be mitigated under part 171 of this chapter.

[T.D. 91-61, 56 FR 32086, July 15, 1991, as amended by T.D. 98-74, 63 FR 51289, Sept. 25, 1998]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-117 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, July 10, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Subcommittee on Safety Research Program of the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a

meeting on July 17 in Rockville, Maryland.

The Subcommittee will meet at 1:00 p.m. in Conference Room 2B3 in the NRC’s

Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike.

The subcommittee will discuss the comments and recommendations included in

the June 16 report entitled “Core Research Capabilities” and the response from the

NRC’s Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for public comment, will

be described in a Notice of Meeting published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal

Register.

#
#### Lorenz Reich v. Alexander S. Cochran and Others.

Motion granted; questions certified. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §2167. Congressional Award Youth Park

#### (a) Designation

The parcel of approximately 5 acres of land located on the Capitol Grounds and described in subsection (b) shall be known and designated as the "Congressional Award Youth Park".

#### (b) Area included

#### (1) In general

The parcel of land described in subsection (a) is—

(A) bounded on the north by Constitution Avenue, N.W.;

(B) bounded on the east by First Street, N.W.;

(C) bounded on the south by Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.; and

(D) bounded on the west by Third Street N.W.

#### (2) Extension

The park shall extend to the curbs of the streets described in paragraph (1).

#### (c) Design

#### (1) Competition

The Architect of the Capitol shall sponsor a competition for the design of the park, based on specifications developed by the Architect.

#### (2) Specifications

#### (A) In general

Not later than June 30, 2002, the Architect, in consultation with the majority leader and the minority leader of the Senate, and the Speaker and the minority leader of the House of Representatives, shall develop the specifications for the park.

#### (B) Requirements

#### (i) In general

The specifications shall require an outdoor design that is accessible to the public.

#### (ii) Inclusions

To the maximum extent practicable, the specifications shall include requirements for—

(I) a fountain;

(II) extensive use of trees and flowering plants from each of the 50 States;

(III) large-scale replicas of the medals awarded under the Congressional Award Program; and

(IV) the inscription of the names of all Congressional Award recipients.

#### (3) Selection

#### (A) In general

As soon as practicable after the competition is completed, the Architect shall forward at least 3 designs, with recommendations, to the United States Capitol Preservation Commission.

#### (B) Final selection

The United States Capitol Preservation Commission shall select and approve the final design from among the 3 designs submitted under subparagraph (A).

#### (d) Funding

Funds otherwise made available to the Architect of the Capitol under this Act shall be available to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 107–68, title I, §134, Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 582.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (d), is Pub. L. 107–68, Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 560, known as the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2002. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 217c of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.