alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998), PART 39.001(1) 

CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY 

SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 

 Page 1 of 1 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive (AD) under 

subregulation 39.001(1) of CASR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to 

correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in 

the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section. 

GippsAero GA200 Series Aeroplanes 

AD/GA200/1 Wing Strut Bolt 17/2012 

Applicability: All GA200 and GA200C aircraft, all serial numbers. 

Requirement: Carry out the requirements of GippsAero service bulletin SB-GA200-2012-08 

Issue 1, dated 22 August 2012 or later approved revision. 

Compliance: Carry out the requirements of the service bulletin within 10 flight hours and thereafter 

every 100 flight hours. 

 This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 24 August 2012. 

Background: As a result of a reported case of failure of the strut bolt through the main spar on a 

GA200C aircraft, GippsAero has issued a mandatory service bulletin to alert 

operators and maintenance organisations and to provide inspection and rectification 

actions. 

This Airworthiness Directive makes this inspection and rectification action 

mandatory. Failure to complete the actions required by this service bulletin may 

result in wing strut bolt failure, resulting in wing structural failure. 

Remarks: Due to the nature of the unsafe condition, a formal consultation process was not 

possible prior to this AD being published. As such interested parties are invited to 

comment on this AD before 24 September 2012. 

Enquiries/Feedback regarding this AD should be referred to the AD Cell, email 

airworthiness.directives@casa.gov.au

Rick Leeds 

Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 

23 August 2012
EXHIBIT 2

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 99-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/18/2020 Page 1 of 3
###### Editorial Note on Part 141

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 141.13 Right to make entry of abandoned or salvaged merchandise.

Underwriters of abandoned merchandise or salvors of merchandise saved from a wreck who are unable to produce a bill of lading, air waybill, certified duplicate bill of lading or air waybill, or carrier's certificate, shall produce evidence satisfactory to the port director of their right to act.

[T.D. 78-394, 43 FR 49787, Oct. 25, 1978]
CONSENT OF RECONTA ERNST & YOUNG S.p.A. RE: STREAM



  
 Exhibit 10.4 
  
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 
  
 We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-43799, 33-71446, 33-86358, 33-89584, 333-04962, 333-06324, 333-07466, 333-10338, 333-10624, 333-12878 and 333-51434-1 and Form F-3 Nos. 333-06896, 333-08246 and 333-13556)
of The News Corporation Limited and subsidiaries of our report dated September 13, 2002, except for Note 15 as to which the date is December 23, 2002, with respect to the financial statements of Stream S.p.A. included in this Annual Report (Form
20-F) for the year ended June 30, 2002. 
  
 /s/    Reconta Ernst & Young
S.p.A. 
                                      
                                        
          
 Reconta Ernst & Young S.p.A. 
  
 Rome, Italy 
 December 27, 2002
#### § 132.6 Exception to reduced rates.

Reduced or modified duty rates under tariff-rate quotas established pursuant to section 350 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended and extended (19 U.S.C. 1351), are not applicable to products imported directly or indirectly from the countries or areas listed under General Note 3(b), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202).

[T.D. 73-203, 53 FR 20230, July 30, 1973, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51255, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 90-78, 55 FR 40166, Oct. 2, 1990]
Editorial Note on Part 142
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 142.43 Line Release application approval process. ( a ) *Port review.* The port director shall review each Line Release application to determine whether the shipments qualify for Line Release processing. The port director may contact the applicant for further information, if necessary. An application that fails to elect whether the Line Release transaction is to be considered an entry or an immediate delivery will be returned to the applicant. If all required information is submitted, the application will be forwarded to Headquarters for final processing.
( b ) *Assignment of C-4 Codes.* A C-4 Code (Common Commodity Classification Code), which is a unique code identifying the shipper or manufacturer, importer, entry filer, and the product for each Line Release shipment, shall be assigned by Headquarters to each application approved for Line Release. Headquarters shall annotate each approved application with a C-4 Code and return the application to the port director who shall return the approved application to the entry filer.
( c ) *Denial of Line Release application.* If the port director is considering the denial of a Line Release application, consideration shall be given to whether an application by the same filer for the same transaction has been approved at another port. If there is not an approved application at another port and the port director determines that the application shall be denied, the application shall be noted denied and returned to the entry filer without a C-4 Code annotation by the port director. If an application has been approved at another port, but the port director still questions whether the application should be approved at his port, the port director shall forward the application to the Assistant Commissioner, Office of Information Management. The Office of Information and Technology will review the application and will notify the port director of the final determination.
0-cr-06219-WDF Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2000 P
0-cr-06219-WDF Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2000 P
0-cr-06219-WDF Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2000 P
0-cr-06219-WDF Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2000 P
### §852. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–300, title I, §184(a)(1), Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1357

Section, Pub. L. 93–203, title II, §221, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1956, related to occupational upgrading and retraining programs.
### 	
  !"#$ %	 &'()*(+,)-+.,+/ 0 1"2345"671' 89 :2327 6 %;9	 5<.&3.:712="151>/ 3"?2#@"  A/3@B2':C<5 ?2#=" >"DEF2' 7/  GHIJKLMN N OPQPRJNSTPNUKVPHNWKXLSNYQKZIVPVN[\N]^_G`NNaPSNUPNbL KcNIdN\KXNLPPVNeL\STILfNPHJP`N 

### g N N hijklmnopqj N rnjqstujvlhqwxqjyzn{l|l}qsz~uouk N kjionsl~ytnttq

N N NGHIJKLNIHHIeUJNUeIHSKeecIHHIeUJH[H`fKZNN NTXQJVe\MN_e\NMNNN_N NK[PQSNGJVeHN N_eQ\NIHZPQN eLIPHNPILSQeX[N ¡¢£NPN¤N eSeNGLeH\JIJNdKQNGG¥NXUYNKQbI LfN¦QKXYN§¦ ̈NeLVN ©^NXHPUebILfNdKQN¥KUUPQWIeHNaN «LVXJSQIeHN XUYJN 

### g ¬­® ̄°±g23 ́μg¶®· ̧g®g1o ̧®»g»o1⁄41⁄23⁄4g¿33Àg ̄ ̧Á±g® ́3Â»g¶ÃgÄ ÅμÆ3⁄4g ÇÈ1⁄4±3 ̄gg É ̄g¬­ÂÊgË®ÌgÍÎÊgÏÅÍÄg®»gÍÐÏÅgÑËÊgÒ3 ́ ̧o»gÇ±À®ÈgÓ o®±À®ÈÔ1⁄2ÂÕ1⁄2±μ3o1

ÖgÁo3» ̧Ðg OINGHIJKLM 

### g
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-33 May 12, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS DISMISSAL OF WORKER

WITH PHILADELPHIA VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL CENTER

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of the Philadelphia Veterans

Administration Medical Center on May 17 to discuss a federal review board’s decision regarding the

termination of a former employee of the facility.

The predecisional enforcement conference will begin at 9:30 a.m. in the Public Meeting at the

NRC’s Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa. It will be open to the public for observation.

In April 1998, a research nurse at the medical center was notified that her employment would

be terminated as of May 15, 1998. The worker subsequently challenged the decision before the U.S.

Merit Systems Protection Board, alleging the termination occurred in response to safety concerns she

had raised. In addition, the nurse asserted said she was subjected to intolerable working conditions

prior to her dismissal.

On April 16, 1999, an administrative law judge for the board issued an initial decision

ordering the hospital to reinstate the worker, with back pay.

NRC staff hopes to gather more information about the case at the meeting on May 17 in order

to render its own decision on the matter.

Indeed, the decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that the

NRC has determined a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the

purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance, and to enable the

licensee to outline any proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this conference. That decision will be

made by NRC officials at a later time.

#
II 

Calendar No. 52 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 559 

[Report No. 117–18] 

To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2021 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

APRIL 28, 2021 

Reported by Mr. SCHATZ, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GRAND RONDE RESERVATION ACT AMEND4 MENT. 

5 Section 1(d) of Public Law 100–425 (commonly 

6 known as the ‘‘Grand Ronde Reservation Act’’) (102 Stat. 

7 1594) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 559 RS

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘lands within 

2 the State of Oregon’’ and inserting ‘‘the 84 acres 

3 known as the Thompson Strip’’; 

4 (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para5 graph (3); and 

6 (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(2) GAMING PROHIBITION.—Any real property 

9 obtained by the Tribes as part of a land claim settle10 ment approved by the United States shall not be eli11 gible, or used, for any class II gaming or class III 

12 gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act 

13 (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) (as those terms are defined 

14 in section 4 of that Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)).’’. 

15 SEC. 2. TREATY RIGHTS OF FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED 

16 TRIBES. 

17 Nothing in this Act, or an amendment made by this 

18 Act, shall be construed to enlarge, confirm, adjudicate, af19 fect, or modify any treaty right of an Indian Tribe (as 

20 defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and 

21 Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304)). 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 52 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 559 

[Report No. 117–18] 

A BILL 

To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and 

for other purposes. 

APRIL 28, 2021 

Reported without amendment 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
§ 101.106 Does Federal law apply to SBA programs and activities? ( a ) SBA makes loans and provides other services that are authorized and executed under Federal programs to achieve national purposes.
( b ) The following are construed and enforced in accordance with Federal law— ( 1 ) Instruments evidencing loans;
( 2 ) Security interests in real or personal property payable to or held by SBA or the Administrator such as promissory notes, bonds, guarantee agreements, mortgages, and deeds of trust;
( 3 ) Other evidences of debt or security;
( 4 ) Contracts or agreements to which SBA is a party, unless expressly provided otherwise.
( c ) To the extent feasible, SBA uses local or state procedures, especially for recordation and notification purposes, in implementing and facilitating SBA's loan programs. This use of local or state procedures is not a waiver by SBA of any Federal immunity from any local or state control, penalty, tax, or liability.
( d ) No person, corporation, or organization that applies for and receives any benefit or assistance from SBA, or that offers any assurance or security upon which SBA relies for the granting of such benefit or assistance, is entitled to claim or assert any local or state law to defeat the obligation incurred in obtaining or assuring such Federal benefit or assistance.
Written Stmt of the principal executive officer



  
 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

  
 In connection with the annual report of Origin Energy Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending June 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Grant A. King, principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 
  

	 	1.
	 
	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 

  

	 	2.
	 
	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

  
 
	 
	 By:
 	 	 /s/ Grant A. King         
 
	  	 	 Managing Director (principal executive officer)
 December 23, 2002
#### § 127.27 Conduct of sale.

Sales may be conducted by the port director, any employee designated by him or by a public auctioneer.
#### Michael Espert, Respondent, v. Eugene F. Perry, as Attorney, etc., Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-53 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, March 17, 1999)

NRC RECEIVES TWO AWARDS FOR PROCUREMENT REFORM EFFORTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received two Hammer Awards from the

National Partnership for Reinventing Government for its procurement reform initiatives.

Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson will present the awards to the staff at a ceremony at

10:30 a.m. on April 8 in the auditorium of the agency’s Two White Flint North Building, 11545

Rockville Pike in Rockville, Maryland.

The first award recognizes the agency’s overhaul of its entire procurement award

process, which allows wide latitude in applying good business sense for the agency. For

instance, certain technical assistance work is now specifically solicited from the relatively small

body of qualified contractors who have been identified as capable of providing support for

NRC’s unique technical mission, rather than being subject to general advertising requirements.

NRC also established a BankCard program for employees to purchase goods up to

certain dollar amounts, and created a link on its webpage for those wishing to do business with

the agency.

The second award focuses on the agency’s initiative allowing companies wishing to do

business with the NRC to describe their qualifications through brief oral presentations, as

opposed to submitting lengthy and costly written proposals. Use of oral presentations has

virtually eliminated time and effort spent by businesses in preparing detailed written proposals,

and allows quicker feedback on evaluations.

In its summary, the NPR noted, “... By substituting oral presentation for written

proposals, the [NRC] has saved both the taxpayer and private industry thousands of dollars in

materials and staff hours needed to prepare and evaluate proposals. Not only has this process

shortened procurement lead times, it also has allowed proposers to gain a better understanding

of the agency’s needs and allowed NRC evaluators to gain a better understanding of the

proposers’ capabilities.”

The NRC has been a pioneer in the use of oral presentations, helping to institutionalize

this process both within the agency, and government-wide. By sharing best practices with other

federal agencies, NRC has helped to make oral presentations an integral part of the way in

which the federal government procures goods and services.

###
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-97-61

FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark (404) 562-4416

(Thursday, August 28,

1997)

Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417

NRC STAFF ISSUES ORDER TO FORMER McGUIRE NUCLEAR PLANT

EMPLOYEE

PROHIBITING INVOLVEMENT IN NRC-LICENSED ACTIVITIES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued an Order

to a former employee at Duke Power Company's McGuire nuclear

power plant which prohibits involvement in NRC-licensed

activities for a one-year period and requires notification to the

NRC of the person's first involvement in NRC-licensed activities

for an additional year after the prohibition expires.

NRC officials sent notification to Robert J. Nelson on

August 18, informing him of the action. The agency issued the

order because Nelson deliberately falsified a document describing

the replacement of a valve gasket at the McGuire plant. An NRC

investigation found that on January 3, 1996, Nelson decided to

reuse an old gasket, intentionally signed the procedure step

claiming he had replaced the gasket and later was not forthright

in providing information about the incident to investigators.

Nelson was terminated by Duke Power Company in January 1996.

#
#### § 111.4 Transacting customs business without a license.

Any person who intentionally transacts customs business, other than as provided in § 111.2(a)(2), without holding a valid broker's license, will be liable for a monetary penalty for each such transaction as well as for each violation of any other provision of 19 U.S.C. 1641. The penalty will be assessed in accordance with subpart E of this part.
#### Thomas L. Crowe, Respondent, v. Harry B. Sale et al., Individually and as Copartners Practicing Law under the Name of Sale & Sale, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ. [See *post,*p. 782.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 1, 1998,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                               2,250
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          721
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         77,023
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    82,328
<PP&E>                                              59,394
<DEPRECIATION>                                      24,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     116,967 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               27,850
<BONDS>                                              7,549
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               132 
<OTHER-SE>                                          78,034 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       116,967
<SALES>                                            133,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   133,798
<CGS>                                               92,574
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       92,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      9,895
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3,958
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  5,937
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         5,937
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .44
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                           GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.
                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greg Manning Auctions,
Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2004, I, Greg Manning, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc., hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

      1.    this Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies
            with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended
            December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
            financial condition and results of operations of Greg Manning
            Auctions, Inc.


Dated:   February 8, 2005
                                          /s/ Greg Manning
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          Greg Manning, President and Chief
                                          Executive Officer
#### § 113.30 Information pertaining to principals and sureties on the bond.

The general information pertaining to the principal and surety which must be given in the body of the bond is set forth in § 113.21.