alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 103.0 Scope.

This part governs the production/disclosure of agency-maintained documents/information requested pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), as amended (5 U.S.C. 552), the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552a), and/or under other statutory or regulatory provisions and/or as requested through administrative and/or legal processes. In this respect, this part contains regulations on production or disclosure in federal, state, local, and foreign proceedings and includes specific information pertaining to the procedures to be followed when producing or disclosing documents or information under various circumstances. In addition, this part contains regulations on other information subject to restricted access. As information obtained by CBP is derived from myriad sources, persons seeking information should consult with the appropriate field officer before invoking the formal procedures set forth in this part. The regulations in this part supplement the regulations of the Department of Homeland Security regarding public access to records found at 6 CFR part 5. For purposes of this part, the CBP Office of the Chief Counsel is considered to be a part of CBP.

[CBP Dec. 15-16, 80 FR 71692, Nov. 17, 2015, as amended by CBP Dec. 20-09, 85 FR 31057, May 22, 2020]
§ 111.39 Advice to client. ( a ) *Withheld or false information.* A broker must not withhold information from a client relative to any customs business it conducts on behalf of a client who is entitled to the information. The broker must not knowingly impart to a client false information relative to any customs business.
( b ) *Due diligence.* A broker must exercise due diligence to ascertain the correctness of any information which the broker imparts to a client, including advice to the client on the proper payment of any duty, tax, or other debt or obligation owing to the U.S. Government.
( c ) *Error or omission by client.* If a broker knows that a client has not complied with the law or has made an error in, or omission from, any document, affidavit, or other record which the law requires the client to execute, he must advise the client promptly of that noncompliance, error, or omission. The broker must advise the client on the proper corrective actions required and retain a record of the broker's communication with the client in accordance with §§ 111.21 and 111.23.
( d ) *Illegal plans.* A broker must not knowingly suggest to a client or prospective client any illegal plan for evading payment of any duty, tax, or other debt or obligation owing to the U.S. Government.
[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63318, Oct. 18, 2022]
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 10.20

                             SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                                OF BRAD LEUSCHNER



         This Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement ("Employment
Agreement") of Brad Leuschner, made this 31ST day of October, 2002, is by and
between ICO, Inc., a Texas corporation with offices at 5333 Westheimer, Suite
600, Houston, Texas 77056; and Brad Leuschner, a Texas resident ("Employee").


         1. Paragraph 4 of the Employment Agreement, entitled "Compensation," is
hereby amended, effective as of November 1, 2002, to read as follows:

              "For the services to be rendered to Company pursuant to this
              Agreement, Company shall pay Employee a salary in the amount of
              One Hundred and Forty Thousand Dollars and no/100 ($140,000.00)
              per annum, less all required deductions, including but not limited
              to federal withholding, social security, and other taxes, which
              salary shall be payable bi-weekly on the Company's regular payroll
              schedule. During the term of this Agreement, Employee's salary
              shall be reviewed at least annually.

              In lieu of use of a Company vehicle, and maintenance, repair,
              insurance, and fuel charges associated therewith, the Employee
              shall receive a monthly vehicle allowance in the sum of $1,190.00
              ("Vehicle Allowance"), paid in advance on the first payday of each
              month. The Vehicle Allowance shall be periodically adjusted to
              reflect inflation. As reimbursement for fuel and vehicle-related
              charges incurred by Employee when using Employee's personal
              vehicle on Company business, Employee shall be reimbursed at the
              IRS reimbursement rate of $0.365 per mile (or the prevailing
              rate)."

         2. All terms and conditions in the Employment Agreement that are not
amended or supplemented pursuant to paragraph 1 above continue to be in full
force and effect between Employee and ICO, Inc.



AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

ICO, INC.

By:   /s/ Jon C. Biro                               /s/   Brad Leuschner
    --------------------------                      --------------------------
                                                    BRAD LEUSCHNER
Printed Name: Jon C. Biro

Title: CFO and Treasurer



                                      S-12
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3678 — Goldman Sachs/Cerberus/TET)

(2006/C 27/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 23 March 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 1, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark L. Lemond, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  December 15, 2003 | By:  /s/ Mark L. LemondMark L. Lemond
President and
Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------





---
#### In the Matter of Helen Barnes, Respondent, against Margaret M. Burnet, Nominee, and S. Howard Cohen et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Herman N. Schwartz, Nominee, Appellant.*

*

 Affd. without opinion 291 N. Y. 681.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     ANNUAL  REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,657
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         8,032
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    8,951
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        15,395
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          15,624
<LOANS>                                      265,849
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,349
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               313,200
<DEPOSITS>                                   141,137
<SHORT-TERM>                                 104,795
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            3,834
<LONG-TERM>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         625
<OTHER-SE>                                    62,808
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               313,200
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               18,617
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,605
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 541
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              20,763
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             5,980
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,723
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         10,060
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    180
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                68
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                5,957
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,123
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,358
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  3.38
<LOANS-NON>                                      110
<LOANS-PAST>                                     212
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                1,008
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2,191
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     29
<RECOVERIES>                                       7
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2,349
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2,349
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0



</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael CLAUFF, Appellant.

No. 01-3476.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 21, 2002.

Filed May 22, 2002.

Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Clauff pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court1 sentenced Clauff to 80 months imprisonment and 4 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has filed a brief arguing that Clauff s criminal history should have been a Category III instead of a Category IV.

The district court did not plainly err in finding Clauff had a Category IV criminal history. *See United States v. Evans,*285 *293F.3d 664, 675-76 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review). Clauff did not object to the inclusion of the underlying convictions in the presentence report. *See United States v. LaRoche,*83 F.3d 958, 959 (8th Cir.1996) (per curiam). Moreover, the criminal history points assessed were appropriate. *See*U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1. Further, following our independent review, see *Penson v.*Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

1

. The HONORABLE LYLE E. STROM, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5THCIR.R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 17, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 04-30731

_____________________

DAVID FRAZIER, etc.; ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

LAKENDRA WILLIAMS, as natural tutrix,

on behalf of Carisma Williams,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CITY OF BOSSIER; ET AL.,

Defendants,

CITY OF BOSSIER; LANCE KIRK ZANER,

individually and as an employee of

the City of Bossier,

Defendants - Appellants.

__________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana 

USDC No. 5:02-CV-698-SMH-RSP

_________________________________________________________________

Before JOLLY, SMITH and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We have reviewed the record, carefully read the briefs, and

have heard excellent arguments from both parties. While the

qualified immunity issue in this case is very close, we have

determined that the district court did not err in concluding that
2

there are material issues of disputed fact that are best decided in

the course of a trial. We therefore lack jurisdiction over this

interlocutory appeal. See Roberts v. City of Shreveport, 397 F.3d

287, 290 (5th Cir. 2005). We also lack jurisdiction over the

interlocutory appeal of the City of Bossier. See id. at 291.

Accordingly this appeal is DISMISSED.
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1637 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1637 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 113.61 General.

Each section in this subpart identifies specific coverage for a particular customs activity. When an individual or organization files a bond with CBP the activity in which they plan on engaging will be identified on the bond. The bond conditions listed in this subpart which correspond to that activity will be incorporated by reference into the bond.

[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-15, 80 FR 70167, Nov. 13, 2015]
§ 113.21 Information required on the bond. ( a ) ( 1 ) *Identification of principal and sureties.* The names of the principal and sureties and their respective places of residence must appear in the bond. In the case of a corporate principal or surety, its legal designation and the address of its principal place of business must appear.
( 2 ) *Identification of trade names and unincorporated divisions of a corporate principal.* The principal may list on the bond trade names and the names of unincorporated divisions of the corporate principal which do not have a separate and distinct legal status who are authorized to use the bond in their own name.
( b ) *Date of execution.* Each bond must bear the date it was actually executed.
( c ) *Statement of the amount.* The amount of the bond must be stated in figures.
( d ) *Use of abbreviations.* Abbreviations may not be used except in dates and the state of incorporation of the principal or the surety.
( e ) *Blank spaces on the bond.* Lines must be drawn through all spaces and blocks on the bond which are not filled in.
[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-15, 80 FR 70164, Nov. 13, 2015]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 October 17, 2014
Dustin Fife, San Juan County Library Director Blanding Library, San Juan County 25 West 300 South Blanding, UT 84511 Subject: Public documents at the Blanding Library for public inspection Dear Mr. Fife: The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency sentyou apackage containing a number ofdocuments regarding the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation nearthe city ofAneth, San Juan County, Utah. Two ofthese documents contained an error, and need to be replaced. Please replace the following documents in the package previously senttoyou with the enclosed documents: 1. PUBLIC INFORMATION SHEET 2. AMBIENTAIR QUALITY IMPACT REPORT & FACT SHEET Yourassistance with this matter is greatly appreciated. Feel freeto contact me at (415) 947-4156 or kelly.shaheerah(Zi~epa.gov ifyou have any questions.Sincerely,

Shaheerah Kelly, Environmental Engineer Permits Office Air Division
Enclosures
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 15

- 00396

- CV

K. D., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 267,636

- B, HONORABLE CHARLES H. VAN ORDEN, JUD GE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant K.D. filed her notice of appeal on June 23, 2015 . The appellate record
was complete July 8, 2015 , making appellant ’ s brief due July 28, 2015 . On July 24, 2015
, counsel for appellant filed a motion for extensio n of time to file appellant’s brief.

Amendments to the rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition
of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a)
(providing 180 days fo r court’s final dispo sition). The accelerated schedule constrains this
Court’s leeway in granting extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order
counsel to file appellant ’ s brief no later than August 17, 2015 . If the brief is not filed by that
date, counse l may be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on July 29, 2015

.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark L. Lemond, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.
|  

|Date: December
      10, 2009 | By: /s/ Mark
      L. Lemond 
|----------------------------- | -----------------------------
|                              | Mark L.
      Lemond         
|                              | President
      and          
|                              | Chief Executive
      Officer

---
#### Republic Bag and Paper Company, Respondent, *v.*Richard S. Hoffman, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 15th day of February, 1915, denying a motion to change the place of trial from the county of New York to the county of Onondaga.

Per Curiam:

We are satisfied that the greater number of material witnesses reside in Onondaga county, where the main transactions took place, and for that reason we think that the place of trial should be changed from the county of New York to the county of Onondaga. The order is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.
§ 68.9 Admissible evidence. ( a ) Legal rules of evidence shall not be in effect at administrative hearings. However, *only* evidence relevant to issues within the scope of review under § 68.8 shall be admissible.
( b ) Documentary and oral evidence shall be admissible.
( c ) Admissibility of non-expert testimony shall be within the discretion of the board.
( d ) All testimony shall be under oath.
( e ) *Res judicata/* collateral estoppel. Where there has been a previous determination, decision or finding of fact by the Director, one of his delegees, an administrative law judge, hearing officer, or hearing board regarding the base flood elevations of any other community, such determination, decision, or finding of fact shall not be binding on the board and may only be admissible into evidence if relevant.
§ 12.14 Detention. ( a ) Port directors shall refuse release of all plants or plant products with respect to which a notice of prohibition has been promulgated by the Secretary of Agriculture under any of the various quarantines. If an importer refuses to export a prohibited shipment immediately, the port director shall report the facts to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs and the United States attorney and withhold delivery pending advice from that Department.
( b ) In case of doubt as to whether any plant or plant product is prohibited, the port director shall detain it pending advice from the Department of Agriculture.
[28 FR 14710, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 78-99, 43 FR 13060, Mar. 29, 1978]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      17,614,024
<SECURITIES>                                70,156,082
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,071,248
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           104,670,552
<PP&E>                                     138,293,343
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,279,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             250,360,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       36,385,686
<BONDS>                                    164,750,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       236,807
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,220,012
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               250,360,981
<SALES>                                        707,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,973,221
<CGS>                                          255,154
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,959,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,071,596
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,308,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (23,473,328)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (23,473,328)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (23,473,328)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.00)
        

</TABLE>