alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-22 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, February 5, 1999)

MEETINGS SET FOR MARCH 1-5 IN TEMPE, ARIZONA, TO DEVELOP

GUIDANCE CONCERNING USE OF POTASSIUM IODIDE

Representatives from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and other Federal,

state, and local agencies, will meet March 1-5 in Tempe, Arizona, to continue efforts to

develop guidance concerning the possible emergency use of potassium iodide by

residents in the vicinity of a nuclear power plant. The meeting will be open to the

public.

The potassium iodide core group, as it is called, also consists of representatives

from the Food and Drug Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, the

National Emergency Management Agency, the Conference of Radiation Control

Program Directors, the states of Arizona, Tennessee, Alabama, and Connecticut, and

the town of Waterford, Connecticut.

One of two guidance documents to be developed is an information brochure.

The other is a draft report entitled, “Assessment of the Use of Potassium Iodide as a

Public Protective Action During a Severe Reactor Accident” (NUREG-1633). Both

documents are meant to assist State and local emergency planners in reaching

informed decisions on whether to plan for the use of potassium iodide in the event of a

nuclear accident. The documents will be published by the NRC.

Potassium iodide is a substance that can be used, if taken shortly after a severe

reactor accident, to block the thyroid gland’s absorption of radioactive iodine and

reduce the risk of thyroid cancer and other diseases.

The Federal government is revising its policy on potassium iodide. The core

group intends to publish its draft guidance for comment in May and release final

documents in October to coincide with the publication of the revised federal policy by

the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Next month’s meeting will be the second of three the core group is holding at

various locations throughout the country. The first was held in December in Rockville,

Maryland. The third will be scheduled later. The sessions in Tempe will be held at the

Amerisuites, located at 1520 West Baseline Road in Tempe. Meeting times are as

follows:
March 1 -- 2:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.

March 2, 3 and 4 -- 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.

March 5 -- 8:30 a.m. - noon.

The Commission directed publication of the draft report and development of the

brochure when it decided last year to amend its emergency planning regulations to

include the use of potassium iodide as a supplement to evacuation and sheltering of

the public during severe nuclear power plant emergencies.

Questions regarding the meeting should be directed to Aby Mohseni, e-mail

asm@nrc.gov, telephone 301-415-6409.

###
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-113 July 20, 2000

NRC HOLDS MEETINGS ON DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

FOR PROPOSED SPENT FUEL STORAGE FACILITY IN UTAH

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, along with the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Bureau of

Land Management, and the Surface Transportation Board, has scheduled public meetings July 27-28 in

Salt Lake City and Grantsville, Utah, to obtain public comments and describe the Draft Environmental

Impact Statement for the proposed Private Fuel Storage facility which would store spent nuclear fuel

on the Goshute Indian Reservation, geographically located within Tooele County, about 85 miles west

of Salt Lake City.

The meetings are scheduled for July 27 in the Arizona Room of the Little America Inn, at 500

South Main Street in Salt Lake City; and for July 28 at the Grantsville Middle School, 318 South Hale

Street in Grantsville. Both meetings will be held from 7:00 - 10:00 p.m.

Copies of the “Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Construction and Operation of an

Independent Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Installation on the Reservation of the Skull Valley Band of

Goshute Indians and the Related Transportation Facility in Tooele County, Utah,” NUREG-1714, are

available on the agency’s website, at http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/NUREGS/indexnum.html

###
### §1653. Amendment of pleadings to show jurisdiction

Defective allegations of jurisdiction may be amended, upon terms, in the trial or appellate courts.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 944.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §399 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §274c, as added Mar. 3, 1915, ch. 90, 38 Stat. 956).

Section was extended to permit amendment of all jurisdictional allegations instead of merely allegations of diversity of citizenship as provided by section 399 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.

Changes were made in phraseology.
EX-10.17





 Exhibit 10.17 

Amendment No. 1 to Master Agreement for Manufacturing Services 

This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”), effective as of June 16, 2020, amends certain provisions of the Master Agreement
for Manufacturing Services dated March 16, 2020, between Artiva Biotherapeutics, Inc. (“Company”), having its principal place of business at 4747 Executive Drive, Suite 1150, San Diego, CA 92121 and Green Cross Cell Corporation, a
Korean corporation (“Manufacturer”), with its principal place of business located at 107, lhyeon-ro 30 beon-gil, Giheung- gu,
Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 16924, Republic of South Korea (hereinafter the “Original Agreement”). 

WHEREAS, Artiva and Manufacturer find it in their respective interests to amend the provisions of the Original Agreement as set forth
below. 
 NOW THEREFORE, for consideration duly given, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties
hereby agree to the following: 
  

	 	1.	 Except as expressly amended hereby, the Original Agreement shall continue to remain in full force and effect in
accordance with its terms. 


  

	 	2.	 Section 10.2 of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following: 


 “Termination of Agreement At Will. Artiva may terminate this
Agreement at any time without cause upon six (6) months’ prior written notice to Manufacturer. Artiva may terminate any Work Order at any time without cause upon sixty (60) days’ prior written notice to Manufacturer.” 

 

	 	3.	 This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which
shall constitute together the same document. The Parties agree that signatures transmitted by electronic means (e.g. facsimile or a scanned version of the executed agreement in PDF format attached to an
e-mail) shall bind the Parties. This Amendment is otherwise governed by the terms and conditions of the Original Agreement, except as amended hereby. 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned parties have had this Amendment executed by its
duly authorized representatives. 
  

									
	ARTIVA BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.	 		  	MANUFACTURER
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas J. Farrell
	 	        	  	By:	  	 /s/ Duckjoo Lee

	Printed Name:     Thomas J. Farrell	 		  	Printed Name:     Duckjoo Lee
	Title:                   President & CEO	 		  	Title:                   CEO

 Amendment No. 1 —Master Agreement for Manufacturing Services
mev. l 02002) Geneml Document

U NITED STATES D ISTRICT C OURT

Southern D istrict of Florida

Case Number:

> ) ' (

Piaintiffts)

FILED BY .C,

JUL l 3 2220

ANGELA E. NOBLE

CLERK .U S. D1S .T cT.

s. D. OF FLA. - FI LAUD.

-

..ypmm l X-zuz. rvxw'-we

r cctwr - -s

Dejyrjdm jjgj

l

# .Cvm (om #

s opooc zyzv

1, ' -zN * V / plaintiff or defendant, in the above styied cause,

tz . (V- #.z' , f . - ,W.5 - ' . - . r .

Y* 4:.

I . t . tsti ' , ,-s vs

K uw ' . h .$ Fm 2,61 k .

e . .t. .- , : a cu,'a . jw y a

. uj.s , - . .é

. . &* .

; , w s.

' 

. V a. . .

< z 1-

Case 1:20-cv-22893-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 1 of 2
(Rev. 1 0/2002) General Document '

Certincate of Senrice

I ' . , certify that on this date . a true copy

of the foregoing document was m ailed to:

namets) and addresstes)

By:

O

Pri ed or typed nnme of Fller

Florida Bar Number

Phone Number

Street Address'

City, State, Zip Code

Sig t'ure of Filer

z'aq . N7 x t v

E- ai1 address

Facsimile Num ber

Case 1:20-cv-22893-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.98 Copper-bearing fluxing material. ( a ) For the purpose of this section, ores usable as a flux or sulphur reagent, mentioned in the provision for such ores in subheading 2603.00.00, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, shall include only ores which contain by weight not over 15 percent copper.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) There shall be filed in connection with the entry of such copper-bearing ores, either for consumption or warehouse, a declaration of the importer, or its electronic equivalent, that the material is to be used for fluxing purposes only. In the case of a consumption entry, the estimated tax shall be deposited at the time of entry. Liquidation of entries shall be suspended pending proof of use for fluxing purposes as hereinafter provided.
( d ) Samples of the material shall be taken in accordance with the commercial method in effect at the plant if to be used in a bonded smelting warehouse, or in accordance with §§ 151.52 through 151.55 of this chapter if entered for consumption, and the copper content thereof shall be determined by the Government chemist in accordance with the assay.
( e ) The management of the smelting or converting plant shall file with the appropriate Customs officer at the port or ports where the entries are to be liquidated, a statement based on its records of operation for each quarterly period showing for each furnace or converter the total quantity of material charged during each month or part thereof of each quarter, the total quantity of material used for fluxing purposes, and the quantity of imported ores used for fluxing purposes for which free entry was claimed under the above-mentioned provision, together with the copper content of such imported ores computed in accordance with the Government assay. If the quantity of ores used for fluxing purposes in any furnace or converter during any month or part thereof of any quarter is in excess of 25 percent of the charge of such furnace or converter, the quarterly statement shall be accompanied by an explanation of the necessity for using such quantity for fluxing purposes.
[28 FR 14663, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17445, July 2, 1973; T.D. 87-75, 52 FR 20067, May 29, 1987; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51251, Dec. 21, 1988; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61284, Oct. 13, 2015]
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.303 Advisory opinions.

The Office of Hearings and Appeals does not issue advisory opinions.

[67 FR 47249, July 18, 2002]
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5328 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.5328

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to extend 
                       terminal lakes assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TERMINAL LAKES ASSISTANCE.
    Section 2507(f) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 
2002 (16 U.S.C. 3839bb-6(f)) is amended by striking ``2023'' and 
inserting ``2025''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-99-22 April 5, 1999

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC FINDS PERFORMANCE ‘ACCEPTABLE’

AT FERMI NUCLEAR PLANT IN LATEST REVIEW

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance remains

acceptable in the NRC’s latest plant performance review at the Fermi Nuclear Power Station,

located at Monroe, Michigan.

The review covered the time period from January of last year through January 31.

In a letter to The Detroit Edison Company, which operates the plant, Geoffrey Grant,

Division Director in the NRC's Region III Office, said, "Overall, performance at Fermi was

acceptable. The plant continued to be operated in a deliberate and conservative manner."

He continued, "Improvement initiatives were effective in improving performance in

specific areas such as maintenance rule implementation and the conduct of safety evaluations.

Areas of concern were operator license training, human performance, and the quality of

procedures and work instructions."

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region III

Office of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power plant in

the nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of plant performance

and provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are an interim measure NRC is using to monitor nuclear

power plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after suspending the

Systematic Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a new assessment

program is developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every 12 to 24 months.

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will provide

quarterly performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators and on inspection

findings. This program will be tested at eight sites beginning in June and will be extended to all

plants next January. A full description of the new program is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

#####
§ 67.8 Appeal procedure. ( a ) If a community appeals the proposed flood elevation determination, the Federal Insurance Administrator shall review and take fully into account any technical or scientific data submitted by the community that tend to negate or contradict the information upon which his/her proposed determination is based.
( b ) The Federal Insurance Administrator shall resolve such appeal by consultation with officials of the local government, or by administrative hearings under the procedures set forth in part 68 of this subchapter, or by submission of the conflicting data to an independent scientific body or appropriate Federal agency for advice.
( c ) The final determination by the Federal Insurance Administrator where an appeal is filed shall be made within a reasonable time.
( d ) Nothing in this section shall be considered to compromise an appellant's rights granted under § 67.12.
( e ) The Federal Insurance Administrator shall make available for public inspection the reports and other information used in making the final determination. This material shall be admissible in a court of law in the event the community seeks judicial review in accordance with § 67.12.
[41 FR 46989, Oct. 26, 1976. Redesignated at 44 FR 31177, May 31, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 44553, Sept. 29, 1983; 49 FR 4751, Feb. 8, 1984]
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

ii ,,, 

I 

In the matter of 

BUSH AIR CARGO, INC., 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

FAA Docket No. CP- not assigned 

Case No. 2015/WP910102 _________________________ ) \- D fV\S: J.-0 'le ~ YOllc>3 

ANSWER 

Respondent, Bush Air Cargo, Inc. (hereinafter, "BAC"), by and through the undersigned, 

responds to the FAA's Complaint filed in the above captioned matter as follows: 

1. Respondent Admits the allegations in paragraph II. No. 1. 

2. Respondent Admits the allegations in paragraph II. No. 2. 

3. Respondent Admits the allegations in paragraph II. No.3. 

4. Respondent Admits the allegations in paragraph II. No. 4 to the extent BAC 

employed Mr. Phillips during the facts at issue in this matter. 

5. Respondent Admits the allegations in paragraph II. No. 5. 

6. Respondent Admits the allegations in paragraph II. No. 6 to the extent that Mr. 

Phillips was employed by TransNorthem, LLC, prior to being hired at BAC. 

7. Respondent admits the allegations in paragraph II. No.7. 

8. Respondent denies the allegations in paragraph II. No. 8. 

9. Respondent denies the allegations in paragraph III. No. 1a. through 1d. 

10. Respondent denies the allegations in paragraph III. No.2. 

11. Respondent denies the allegations in paragraph III. No. 3 

FAA v. BAC, Answer 

Page 1 of3 
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

Even if the Administrator's allegations are proven true, the civil penalty demanded is not 

appropriate given representations made by the Administrator's agent and financial condition of 

BAC measured against the severity of the allegations. 

RESERVATION OF FURTHER AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

BAC reserves the right to amend this Answer to assert additional affirmative defenses as 

may be discovered during their preparation of this case for trial or defenses discovered at trial. 

GENERAL DENIAL 

BAC denies each and every allegation in the Complaint which is not expressly 

admitted in this Answer. 

PRAYER FOR RELIEF 

WHEREFORE, BAC prays for the following relief: 

A. For a fmding in favor of BAC with an award of court costs and reasonable 

attorney fees; or alternatively, 

B. For a substantially reduced civil penalty appropriate to the alleged violation. 

DATED at Anchorage, Alaska, this 14'h day of March, 2016. 

Counsel for Bush Air Cargo,, 

~,;,1' # /j . . 

i( 11. / f 

'",. 1 '"v::zdh~, ~t~ /~~ 'Har(on M. Tieman, President/General Coun~el 

P.O. Box 93144 

Anchorage, Ak 99509 

(907) 277-7657 

bushaircargo@gmail.com 

FAA v. BAC, Answer 

Page 2 of3 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that on March 14, 2016 

a copy of the foregoing was delivered 

by U.S. Mail to: 

FAA Enforcement Division, Western Team 

Attention: Kyle Lomazow 

1601 Lind Avenue S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilber Wright Building-Suite 2W I 000 

800. Independ.e~~~,"due, .SW 

7ington, DA I ·-

• 

"'-.._J.f~_,:(,~/~ /(.d . Barton M. Tieman 

FAA v. BAC, Answer 

Page3 of3
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-044 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(THURSDAY, MARCH 20, 1997)

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET APRIL 3-5

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on

Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a technical meeting April

3-5 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in

Conference Room 2B3 in the NRC's Two White Flint North Building

at 11545 Rockville Pike.

Although meetings of the ACRS are open, they are not part of

the NRC's public hearing process. The ACRS, an advisory group to

the Commission, conducts independent, highly technical reviews of

safety considerations related to nuclear facilities. While

anyone may attend, the committee will consider only oral or

written statements arranged in advance and limited to specific

matters set forth in a Notice of Meeting published in the Federal

Register March 20.

The meeting may include closed sessions, if required, to

discuss proprietary information.

Here is the complete meeting agenda:

THURSDAY, APRIL 3

8:30 to 8:45 a.m. -- Opening remarks by the ACRS chairman.

8:45 - 9:45 a.m. -- Discussions with NRC staff regarding

the proposed regulatory approach for dealing with steam

generator integrity issues. Industry representatives will

participate as appropriate.

10:00 - 11:30 a.m. -- Discussions with the NRC staff on

the consequences of reactor water cleanup system line breaks

outside containment.

11:30 - 11:45 a.m. -- Report from the Chairman of the

Thermohydraulic Phenomena Subcommittee.
11:45 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. -- Discussions of responses from

the NRC Executive Director for Operations to recent ACRS

reports.

1:00 - 2:30 p.m. -- Discussions with the NRC staff

regarding the proposed regulatory guidance related to 10 CFR

50.59 requirements.

2:45 - 6:30 p.m. -- Preparation of ACRS reports.

FRIDAY, APRIL 4

8:35 - 10:00 a.m. -- Discussions with NRC staff on issues

associated with degradation of Boraflex used in spent fuel

pool storage racks.

10:15 -11:45 a.m. -- Discussion with NRC staff on use of

potassium iodide following a severe accident.

1:15 - 1:45 p.m. -- Future ACRS activities.

1:45 - 7:00 p.m. -- Preparation of ACRS reports.

SATURDAY, APRIL 5

8:30 - 9:00 a.m. -- Report of the Planning and Procedures

Subcommittee.

9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. -- Preparation of ACRS reports.

12:00 - 1:00 p.m. -- Strategic planning.

1:00 - 1:30 p.m. -- Miscellaneous matters.

Persons wishing to submit statements on any of these topics

may do so by providing a readily reproducible copy to the

committee or by mailing it to the Executive Director, Advisory

Committee on Reactor Safeguards, Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001.

(ACRS meeting schedules are subject to change. Anyone

planning to attend should confirm the schedule the day before the

meeting by calling (301) 415-5024.

#
Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

     By  signing  below,  each  of the  undersigned  officers  hereby  certifies
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i) this report fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the  information  contained in this report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Union Community Bancorp.

Signed this 29th day of March, 2004.



/s/ J. Lee Walden                       /s/ Alan L. Grimble
----------------------------------      ----------------------------------------
J. Lee Walden                           Alan L. Grimble
Chief Financial Officer                 Chief Executive Officer