alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-43 April 14, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC ISSUES PERFORMANCE REVIEW FOR OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff, in its latest review of performance at the

Oyster Creek nuclear power plant, has found that safety performance at the Lacey Township,

N.J., facility remains acceptable. The plant is operated by GPU Nuclear Inc.

In a letter to the company outlining the results of the review, Wayne L. Schmidt, acting

chief of the NRC Region I Division of Reactor Projects branch responsible for inspecting Oyster

Creek, said the plant’s senior management was actively involved, maintained a strong presence

and demonstrated safety-conscious decision-making during the evaluation period of April 1998

through Jan. 15, 1999. Schmidt also said the rate of personnel errors remained low and that

nuclear safety assessment group provided timely, critical insights on plant performance to

management.

Performance in the area of operations continued to improve, and maintenance

performance remained effective. In the engineering area, personnel demonstrated “good

ownership of assigned issues and provided excellent support” to workers in the operations and

maintenance departments. Plant support was effective with one exception: corrective actions

for the emergency preparedness program were not always completed in a timely manner.

The NRC staff will conduct normal inspections during the next evaluation period, with a

supplemental inspection planned to look at controls over maintenance work conducted while the

plant operates.

The text of the plant performance review (PPR) letter is available from the NRC Region I

Office of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power plant in the

nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of plant performance

and provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

PPRs are being used by the NRC as an interim measure to monitor nuclear power plant

safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after suspending the Systematic

Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) process until a new assessment program is

developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every 12 to 24 months.

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will provide

quarterly performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators and on inspection

findings. This program will be tested at eight sites beginning in June and will be extended to all
plants next January. A full description of the new program is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

#
#### Samuel Rothstein, Respondent, v. Zagoreos Bros., Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
<PAGE>
DEARBORN BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q (continued)

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Form
10-Q") of Dearborn Bancorp, Inc. (the "Issuer").

         I, Michael J. Ross, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Issuer, certify that:

         (i)      The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.



Dated: May 10, 2003

                                                 /s/ Michael J. Ross
                                        --------------------------------------
                                                    Michael J. Ross
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer,
                                                Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
http://www.naturalinquirer.org

http://www.scienceinvestigator.org

Most Exciting Discovery

I calculated the potential 

biomass energy lost from 

harvesting trees on nutrientpoor sites and the energy 

it would require to restore 

the nutrients to the soil. I 

showed that the energy gain 

of having fertile soil is much 

greater than the energy 

needed to fertilize the soil.

Important Scientist Characteristics: 

I think my most important talent is in communicating

science to a wide variety of people. Too often, scientists

focus on discovery but don’t communicate it well. I enjoy

speaking about my science to everyone, from the best

experts to local elementary schools.

Example of a simple research question I have tried 

to answer: Do forest management practices, such as 

tree harvesting, alter the soil’s ability to function in a 

number of ways?

Technology or equipment used in research: 

I frequently use a custom-made soil coring tool. It’s 

about 50 cm long, 8 cm wide, and is hammered into the 

soil to remove an intact soil core 30 cm long. From this 

sample, I can calculate all sorts of chemical and physical 

properties important to understanding how the soil 

functions.

A soil scientist 

studies soil properties 

and processes and how 

they change in response to 

management actions, and 

how they influence other 

parts of the forest. 

Dr. Andy Scott

Research Soil Scientist

Ph.D., Virginia Tech

USDA Forest Service scientist

www.srs.fs.usda.gov/4159/

When did you know you 

wanted to be a scientist?

I grew up exploring the 

forests around my house, and 

entered forestry upon the 

advice of a local forester. I 

got a job working for a forest 

soils scientist the first summer 

I was in college and I found 

that I loved forestry, soils, and 

science.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-61469-RS

AKAI CUSTOM GUNS, LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

KKM PRECISION, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

[DE 174], in which Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle recommends granting in part Plaintiffs’

Motion Regarding Spoliation of Evidence [DE 134] (the “Motion”) solely as to Mr. Luke 

McIntire’s iPhone X communications. No objections have been filed to the Report and 

Recommendation. Thus, having reviewed Magistrate Judge Valle’s Report and Recommendation, 

the record, and given that no party has filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation, it 

is hereby,

ORDERED that:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [DE 174] is AFFIRMED AND 

ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiffs’ Motion Regarding Spoliation of Evidence [DE 134] is GRANTED in part:

a. The Motion is granted as to Mr. Luke McIntire’s iPhone X communications;

b. The Motion is denied as to Defendant Shooters Connection, Inc.

c. The Motion is denied as to Defendant KKM Precision, Inc.’s purchases from 

Ta Chen International, Inc. and North American Stainless;

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 178 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

d. The Motion is denied as to Mr. Michael Dame’s communications;

e. The Motion is denied as to Mr. Timothy Mekosh’s communications.

3. To cure any prejudice to Plaintiffs from the spoliation, the Court shall:

a. Permit Plaintiffs to present evidence at trial regarding the loss and likely 

relevance of the missing iPhone X communications; and

b. Instruct the jury that it may consider this evidence, along with all the other 

evidence, in making its decision.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida this 8th day of August, 2023.

cc: All Counsel of Record 

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 178 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2023 Page 2 of 2
**Docket No. FAA -**  **2013 -**  **0624**
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

101 Marietta St., Suite 2900, Atlanta, GA 30323

Tel. 404-331-5503 or 7878

No.: II-96-74 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Tuesday, September 3, 1996)

Roger Hannah 404-331-7878

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT SURRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have announced the assignment of

Randy Musser as the agency's Senior Resident Inspector at the Surry nuclear power plant, located

near Surry, Virginia. He succeeds Morris Branch, the Senior Resident Inspector at the Surry

plant since 1991.

Before joining the NRC, Musser worked at the Charleston Naval Shipyard in the Nuclear

Engineering Department as a shift refueling engineer. He joined the NRC in 1987 as a resident

inspector at the Hatch nuclear plant. Since 1992, Musser was assigned as a resident inspector at

the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, where he was the lead resident inspector monitoring the restart

of Browns Ferry Unit 3. He received a Bachelor's degree in Marine Engineering and a U.S.

Coast Guard Third Assistant Engineer's License from the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy.

Musser officially became the Senior Resident Inspector at the Surry plant on August 30,

joining NRC Resident Inspectors David Kern and Keith Poertner. The NRC inspectors at the

Surry plant can be reached at 757-357-2101.

###
### §4502. Appropriation of funds for compensation of Members of Congress and for administrative expenses at levels authorized by law and recommended by the President for Federal employees

Effective beginning with fiscal year 1983, and continuing each year thereafter, such sums as hereafter may be necessary for "Compensation of Members" (and administrative expenses related thereto), as authorized by law and at such level recommended by the President for Federal employees for that fiscal year are hereby appropriated from money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated. Such sums when paid shall be in lieu of any sums accrued in prior years but not paid. For purposes of this subsection, the term "Member" means each Member of the Senate and the House of Representatives, the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico, the Delegates from the District of Columbia, Guam, Virgin Islands, and American Samoa, and the Vice President.

(Pub. L. 97–51, §130(c), Oct. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 966.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified as a note under section 31 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,280
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             113
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               113
<LOANS>                                        131,297
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,324
<DEPOSITS>                                     152,436
<SHORT-TERM>                                    27,657
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            153,369
<LONG-TERM>                                     15,223
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              289
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,786
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 216,324
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,808
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,821
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    60
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,689
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,349
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,035
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,654
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      373
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  86
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,351
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       930
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.72
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,553
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   939
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      190
<RECOVERIES>                                        28
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,150
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,150


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.390 Revolving credit. ( a ) CapLines finances eligible small businesses' short-term, revolving and non-revolving working-capital needs. SBA regulations governing the 7(a) loan program govern business loans made under this program. The maximum guaranteed amount and the maximum loan amount are the same under CapLines as other 7(a) loans, as stated in § 120.151.
( b ) CapLines proceeds can be used to finance the cyclical, recurring, or other identifiable short-term operating capital needs of small businesses. Proceeds can be used to create current assets or used to provide financing against the current assets that already exist.
[61 FR 3235, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 76 FR 63546, Oct. 12, 2011]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 13.1

TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
CODE)

     PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A)
AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE), THE
UNDERSIGNED OFFICER OF TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED, AN AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANY (THE "COMPANY"), HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT:
     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2003(the
"Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 23, 2003                \s\ Zygmunt E Switkowski
                                        Zygmunt E. Switkowski
                                        Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 13.2



TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
CODE)

     PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A)
AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE), THE
UNDERSIGNED OFFICER OF TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED, AN AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANY (THE "COMPANY"), HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT:
     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2003(the
"Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 23, 2003                \s\ John Stanhope
                                        John Stanhope
                                        Chief Financial Officer
#### William F. Perry, Sr., as Administrator, etc., Plaintiff, v. Rochester Lime Company, Defendant.

Motion to amend decision denied, with ten dollars costs.
# --- ::!:r-Dn mAn Eii!IGIGI ASSEMBLY SECTION**!fl~ijf.l!fl** 

# TAPlOT



# 0 

# 4-**lll~fl:lidUI~(M2. 5x** **~** 8) x4 Socket screws

# ~PJ**fi<~{<P5.** 5x<P2. 6x0. 4) x4 Washer

I 

# o 

# T**IAI9<fl:l:i\1UI~<M 2**  5x30)x8
Socket

### screw**;~ \** 

# ~**~~~~** fl:l :i\11!**~l!fi'!l~** ( <P3

. 2xM2. 5x5mm) x28 Round six angle screws stage**~~~~~fl:l:i\ 11!!1~(M3x5mm)**  x8 So.ckeLbutton

- heacrscrew

fl<i5.1(<P5. 5x<P2. 6x0. 4) x16 Washer

I 

# 0**~ 1119<fl:l:i\1f!ji~(M2.**  5x22) x4 1

Socket**screws /-** **...,_**

# o-**~** 

# -@-

I 1119< fl:l :i\11!**ttl!fi'll~** ( <P3

. 2xM2. 5x5mm) x20 Round six angle screws stage**~Ill~** fl:l 

### 7\ 11! G!i (M3x6mm) x6 Socket button head screw

$i5J(.P5. 5x<P2

. 6x0. 4)x12 Washer**$~(<P5.** 

### mnBIHI([ Plastic tri po d

Carbon fiber pipe buckle

Carbon fib er tub**JJIII~Iil:iE~** Tripod f ixing seat**;**

# ~ Rubber sleeve fixe d seat

Washer**fll~fl:lidUI~M2.** 5x22mm Socket screws**lll~fl:l7\1f!!I~(M2.** 5x18) Socket screws



### $**~** 

### ( <P 5. Sx cl>2. 6x0. 4) Washer**•UJt~iUH:&1.** 6mm Motor base carbon fibe r board**ll!.tll~ Lt)**  Moto r base**lltll~CF)** The motor seat**.!¥1Al~fl:l** 71:1flll!iM3x5mm Socket button head screw**1119<fl:l:i\1il~l!fi'll~** <P3

. 2xM2. 5x5mm Round six angle screws stage liJ:JEjlfllM2. 5**~iS~** horta l uminum column

# :::!:r-Dn mAn &I!IIDID ASSEMBLY SECTION**i§.~i.5?.Pfl** 

# TAPIOT

J1!**Ill~** J;lj i<;**111!111~** (M3x6mm) x6 Socket button head screw



### .4i\ CAUTION 

## L.:D. i1**~ $111~**  J;lji<;**M!lll~** (M3x6mm) x4

Socket button head screw



### .4i\ CAUTION 

## L.:D. i1 •


# TAPIOT

.4i\ CAUTION 

## L.:D. i1 •

### -~~.filE&z~.**~~ "M"iWff~f~HJ.!**  

### M1, M3,**M5~1"! ~,**  

### M2, M4,**M6~1"! ~**  o 

## There are difference of pros and cons in the propeller, please identify it carefu II y before installation! Ml, M3, M5 

## is the same, M2, M4, M6 

## is the same too. J1!**Ill~** J;IJ**i\lfi!III~M3x6mm** Socket button head sere

# ~----**--** Fornt 

# t

680mm

::::=:ran mAn &am
§ 12.109 Seizure and forfeiture. ( a ) Whenever any pre-Columbian monumental or architectural sculpture or mural listed in § 12.105 is detained in accordance with § 12.108 and the importer states in writing that he will not attempt to secure the certificate or evidence required, or such certificate or evidence is not presented to the port director prior to the expiration of the time provided in § 12.108, the sculpture or mural shall be seized and summarily forfeited to the United States in accordance with part 162 of this chapter.
( b ) Any pre-Columbian monumental or architectural sculpture or mural which is forfeited to the United States shall in accordance with the provisions of Title II of Pub. L. 92-587, 19 U.S.C. 2093(b): ( 1 ) First be offered for return to the country of origin, and shall be returned if that country presents a request in writing for the return of the article and agrees to bear all expenses incurred incident to such return; or
( 2 ) If not returned to the country of origin, be disposed of in accordance with law, pursuant to the provisions of section 609, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1609), and § 162.46 of this chapter.
[T.D. 73-119, 38 FR 10807, May 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 82-145, 47 FR 35477, Aug. 16, 1982]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 80 (Thursday, April 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 24386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09850]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, May 24, 2013.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of this or any future meetings change, an 
announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melissa D. Jurgens, 202-418-5516.

Natise Stowe,
Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2013-09850 Filed 4-23-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

WALKER AG SUPPLY, LLC, et al 

Complainants, 

v. 

WAHOO AIRPORT AUTHORITY, 

WAHOO MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 

Respondents. 

FAADocketNo.16-14-08 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, 

the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby 

extended to September 23, 2016. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in 

this case due to the complexity of the Record. 

M nager, Airport 

Compliance Division 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 21, 2016, I caused to be placed in the United 

States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the foregoing document addressed 

to: 

Agent for Complainants: 

Mr. William Foster 

Better Airports, LLC 

4504 North Versailles Avenue 

Dallas, Texas 75205 

Counsel for Respondents: 

Mr. Larry S. Kaplan 

Mr. Keith Y arnaguchi 

Kaplan, Massamillo & Andrews, LLC 

200 West Madison Street 

16th Floor 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

Copies to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100 

FAA Central Region, ACE-600 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. New York Mail and Newspaper Transportation Company, Appellant, v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, Defendant. The City of New York, Intervenor, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.