alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 1 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 2 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 3 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 4 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 5 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 6 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 7 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 8 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 9 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 10 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 11 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 12 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 13 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 14 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 15 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 16 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 17 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 18 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 19 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 20 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 21 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 22 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 23 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 24 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 25 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 26 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 27 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 28 of 29

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020   Page 29 of 29
Exhibit
      32.2





Ener1,
      Inc.


500
      West
      Cypress Creek Road-Suite 100


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309





August
        8,
        2006





Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549





Re:
      Certification Of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350





Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
      connection with the accompanying Amendment No. 4 to Quarterly Report on
      Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Gerard Herlihy, Chief Financial
      Officer of Ener1, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1)
            such
                Amendment No. 4 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1,
                Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with
                the
                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                Act of
                1934; and








2)
            the
                information contained in such Amendment No. 4 to Quarterly
                Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended September
                30,
                2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                and results of operations of Ener1,
                Inc.








/s/
                Gerard Herlihy
              Gerard
                Herlihy
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              (Duly
                Authorized Principal Financial and
              Accounting
                Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
      retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.





This
      certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to Ener1, Inc.’s
      quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
      to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
      reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
      except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
      filing.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000397 23-APR-2019 09:00 AM
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-25 June 22, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC TO DISCUSS

NEW REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS FOR RIVER BEND

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting Thursday, June 29, in St.

Francisville, La., to discuss the new reactor oversight process for River Bend, a nuclear power plant

operated by Entergy.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. at the St. Francis Hotel on the Lake, U.S. Hwy. 61 at LA 10,

St. Francisville. Anyone who would like to learn more about the new oversight process or ask

questions of NRC officials is invited to attend.

The new program was implemented nationwide in early April after a six-month pilot test

conducted at 13 nuclear power plants at nine sites from May to November 1999. It uses more

objective, timely, and safety-significant criteria in assessing performance, while seeking to more

effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. It also takes into account improvements in the

performance of the nuclear industry over the past twenty years.

Under the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based

personnel are supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators.

These performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant performance, including the

viability of redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection, and security.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s internet website every three months, along with semi-annual updates to each plant's inspection

plans. Current performance information for River Bend can be found at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/RBS1/rbs1_chart.html

A plain language summary of the new inspection and assessment program is available from the

NRC Office of Public Affairs or on the website at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

##
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.709 Country of origin criteria. ( a ) *General.* Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a good imported directly from Jordan into the customs territory of the United States will be eligible for preferential tariff treatment under the US-JFTA only if: ( 1 ) The good is either: ( i ) Wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of Jordan; or
( ii ) A new or different article of commerce that has been grown, produced, or manufactured in Jordan; and
( 2 ) With respect to a good described in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, the good satisfies the value-content requirement specified in § 10.710 of this subpart.
( b ) *Exceptions* — ( 1 ) *Combining, packaging, and diluting operations.* No good will be considered to meet the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section by virtue of having merely undergone simple combining or packaging operations, or mere dilution with water or mere dilution with another substance that does not materially alter the characteristics of the good. The principles and examples set forth in § 10.195(a)(2) of this part will apply equally for purposes of this paragraph.
( 2 ) *Certain juices.* A good will not be considered to meet the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section if the good: ( i ) Is imported into Jordan, and, at the time of importation, would be classified in heading 0805, HTSUS; and
( ii ) Is processed in Jordan into a good classified in any of subheadings 2009.11 through 2009.30, HTSUS.
( c ) *Textile and apparel goods.* For purposes of determining whether a textile or apparel good meets the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the provisions of § 102.21 of this chapter will apply.
### §1410. Other judicial review prohibited

Except as expressly authorized by sections 1407, 1408, and 1409 of this title, the compliance or noncompliance with the provisions of this chapter and any action taken pursuant to this chapter shall not be subject to judicial review.

(Pub. L. 104–1, title IV, §410, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 37.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–1, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 3, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1301 of this title and Tables.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-98-38 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Friday, May 15, 1998)

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $10,500 CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST BAXTER

HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF PUERTO RICO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $10,500 civil penalty

against Baxter HEALTH CARE Corporation of Puerto Rico for performing an

unauthorized alteration and multiple unauthorized repairs on an irradiator the company

operates at Aibonito.

The NRC action follows agency inspections at the facility in 1996 and 1997, an

investigation completed by the NRC’s Office of Investigations on November 17 of last

year, and a predecisional enforcement conference held at the facility on January 12 of

this year. NRC officials said the inspections and the investigation indicated the

company violated NRC regulatory requirements when, in June of 1996, an interlock

switch, which is part of an “on/off” mechanism in the irradiator’s safety system, was

bypassed. Three additional subsequent violations occurred when company personnel

conducted unauthorized repairs of equipment affecting the “on/off” mechanism.

NRC officials said no accidents or injuries occurred but that the irradiator’s

license requires that alterations or repairs be conducted only by its manufacturer or

other persons specifically licensed or authorized by the NRC.

The irradiator uses radioactive cobalt-60 which is stored under water and raised

in a shielded room during processing to provide gamma irradiation to sterilize medical

products.

The company has 30 days from receipt of the Notice of Violation to either pay

the fine or protest its imposition.

#
Mr. Nick Parsons 

Environmental Engineer 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

OAR/OAQPS/SPPD/CCGEPA Denver (Region 8) 

In Re Docket ID: EPA-HQ-Oq-2010-0505 

Dear Mr. Parsons: 

 

As a resident of Salt Lake City, I can attest to the poor quality of air we often experience in the Salt Lake Valley. 

Last winter we had 44 days of poor quality air; 22 days were yellow alert days and 22 days were red alert days. 

On several days last winter, we had the worst air quality in the nation, with PM2.5 levels reaching as high as 123 

ug/cubic meter. Last spring, we had dust storms where PM2.5 values spiked to 250ug/cubic meter! Not only was 

that a problem for me personally, but even my dog was coughing! This poor air quality has significant and costly 

health impacts to those of us who live here. It even impacts our wildlife and the birds that feed and nest on the 

Great Salt Lake.

I urge you to place tighter regulations on oil and gas drilling on the Colorado Plateau because pollution from these 

activities negatively impacts our already substandard air quality.

Oil and gas exploration and drilling generates large amounts of dust, volatile organic compounds, nitrous oxides, 

and carbon monoxide, all of which significantly impact air quality, when blown into the Salt Lake Valley where it 

can add to our existing air quality problems making it even more difficult to meet EPA standards.

Furthermore, these activities contribute to global climate change. The Colorado Plateau is predicted to become 

both warmer and drier as the climate changes due to human activities. The extinction of many species is 

predicted and those that do survive will often find it necessary to shift their ranges. To help our wildlife survive 

this significant threat to their habitat and existence, we need to protect large core areas and corridors. Oil and 

gas exploration and drilling is destructive to the environment and represents a direct threat to many species. 

Tighter oil and gas drilling regulations on the Colorado Plateau would reduce unhealthy air pollution locally and 

prevent more pollutants from reaching the Salt Lake Valley, where air quality is a significant problem. It would also 

help preserve our open land and connections so necessary for wildlife survival.

Sincerely,

Marion Klaus

2730 Forest Spring Way

Salt Lake City, UT 84106

Re Docket ID: EPA-HQ-Oq-2010-0505

Marion Klaus 

to: 

Nick Parsons 

08/02/2010 04:00 PM 

Show Details 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\nparsons\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web7939.h... 8/9/2010
10' G Y

2011 OCT -3

DO' T -08-2011-002

J THEM T RO .:

M RATHO OlLCOMP

:P D'

OPPO EO

o

OMP 1 T

EEM

On ctob r". _01 I. R spond 111 Ii led an n ppo ed Motion to I\m nd. dministrati (;

'omplainl and ons nt Agreement. Th Moti 11 rcqu SlS. pur uant t paragl'oph F.13 fth

grccmcl1t, thot the C{Hlll1ainl and ' n nl grcl.:!n m be am nded it III ludc a R vi d

pp ·ndi.· A. Th R' i. d ppen ix ha min r h nQL that c rr ell l' 1 '1 the dlily

[lam •10 ali n and n ·tru tion tart dat s.

The court h r b appro es the lion to Amend to includ

ba d on the terms J Ull: omplaint and ns III

OC.F.R..'§2_.1 (C),_ .16( and22.18(b)(...). Th R spond'J1tish'r'byORD~REOt()

mply with all of tll.: 1'I'mS of th Can ot gr m'Ill, which as em ti . n ugu t 29. _011

b Final Order.

RED I ~~~~~ ! 2011.
CERTlFlCAn: OF SERVICE:

The undersigned certifies that [he original of the attached OiliER ON UNOPPOSED

MOTION TO AMEND ADMINISTATIVE COMPLAINT ANI) CONSENT

AGREEMENTin lhe. maller of MARATHON OIL CO.; DOCKET 1'10.: CAA-08-2011-

0025. was liled Wilh lhe Regionaillearing Clerk all October 3. 2011.

Further, th!,l undl.:rsigncd certifies that a tfile and COrrect copy of the document was

delivered to .lim Eppers. Enforcement Attorney. U. S. EPA - Region 8. 1595 Wynkoop Street.

Dt.:l1vcr. CO 80202-1129. True a.nd correct copies of the aforemelltioned docul11cnis were placed

in Ihl.: United Stmcs mail on OCLObcr 3. 21011, to:

Rehccca K. Skiba

Marathon Oil Company

5555 San Felipe

IlollSlon. Texas 77056

October 3. 20 II .JLItA a.dl.eM l<2

Tina Artemis

Regional Ileuring Clerk/Paralegal
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-17 May 25, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC TO DISCUSS

NEW REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROGRAM FOR ANO

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting Wednesday, May 31, in

Russellville, Arkansas, to discuss the revised reactor oversight program for Arkansas Nuclear One, a

nuclear power plant near that city operated by Entergy Operations, Inc.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. at the Holiday Inn, 2407 N. Arkansas Ave. Anyone who

would like to learn more about the new oversight process or ask questions of NRC officials is invited

to attend.

The new program was implemented nationwide in early April after a six-month pilot test

conducted at 13 nuclear power plants at nine sites from May to November 1999. It uses more

objective, timely, and safety-significant criteria in assessing performance, while seeking to more

effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. It also takes into account improvements in the

performance of the nuclear industry over the past twenty years.

Under the new program, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based

personnel are supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators.

These performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant performance, including the

viability of redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection, and security.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s internet website every three months, along with semi-annual updates to each plant's inspection

plans. Current performance information for ANO can be found at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/ANO1/ano1_chart.html.

A plain language summary of the new inspection and assessment program is available from the

NRC Office of Public Affairs or on the website at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm .

###
#### Samuel S. Strauss, Appellant, v. Robert Alexander, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §3305. Programs for corrections education and other institutionalized individuals

#### (a) Program authorized

From funds made available under section 3302(a)(1) of this title for a fiscal year, each eligible agency shall carry out corrections education and education for other institutionalized individuals.

#### (b) Uses of funds

The funds described in subsection (a) shall be used for the cost of educational programs for criminal offenders in correctional institutions and for other institutionalized individuals, including academic programs for—

(1) adult education and literacy activities;

(2) special education, as determined by the eligible agency;

(3) secondary school credit;

(4) integrated education and training;

(5) career pathways;

(6) concurrent enrollment;

(7) peer tutoring; and

(8) transition to re-entry initiatives and other postrelease services with the goal of reducing recidivism.

#### (c) Priority

Each eligible agency that is using assistance provided under this section to carry out a program for criminal offenders within a correctional institution shall give priority to serving individuals who are likely to leave the correctional institution within 5 years of participation in the program.

#### (d) Report

In addition to any report required under section 3141 of this title, each eligible agency that receives assistance provided under this section shall annually prepare and submit to the Secretary a report on the progress, as described in section 3141 of this title, of the eligible agency with respect to the programs and activities carried out under this section, including the relative rate of recidivism for the criminal offenders served.

#### (e) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Correctional institution

The term "correctional institution" means any—

(A) prison;

(B) jail;

(C) reformatory;

(D) work farm;

(E) detention center; or

(F) halfway house, community-based rehabilitation center, or any other similar institution designed for the confinement or rehabilitation of criminal offenders.

#### (2) Criminal offender

The term "criminal offender" means any individual who is charged with or convicted of any criminal offense.

(Pub. L. 113–128, title II, §225, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1617.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
§ 208.63 Request by DHS for supplemental information. ( a ) At any stage of the reimbursement and appeal processes identified in this subpart, DHS may request the Sponsoring Agency to provide supplemental information that DHS considers necessary to determine either a claim for reimbursement or an appeal. The Sponsoring Agency must exercise its best efforts to provide the supplemental information and must submit to DHS a written response that includes such supplemental information as the Sponsoring Agency is able to provide within 30 days after receiving DHS's request.
( b ) If DHS makes a request for supplemental information at any stage of the reimbursement and appeal processes, the applicable time within which its determination of the claim or appeal is to be made will be extended by 30 days. However, without the consent of the Sponsoring Agency, no more than one such time extension will be allowed for any stage of the reimbursement and appeal processes.
Exhibit 10.28
  
 Agreement Date of Grant Company Participant
 R E C I T A L S
 Plan
 RSUs
  Grant of the RSUs
 Vesting/Form and Timing of Issuance or Transfer
 Scheduled Vesting Date
  Change of Control
Vesting Date
 Vesting Date provided




---



##### 



No Right to Continued Employment
 No Rights of a Shareholder
 Certificates
 Transferability




---



##### 



Withholding
 Securities Laws
 Notices
 Choice of Law THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICTS OF LAWS
 RSUs and Shares Subject to Plan and Stockholders Agreement
 Signature in Counterparts




---



##### 



VANGUARD HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.By:Agreed and acknowledged asof the date first above written:
### §4334. Availability of funds for franked mail expenses

Funds in the account, within the contingent fund of the Senate, available for the expenses of inquiries and investigations shall be available for franked mail expenses incurred by committees of the Senate the other expenses of which are paid from that account.

(Pub. L. 105–55, title I, §6(b), Oct. 7, 1997, 111 Stat. 1181.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 69–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriations Act, 1998, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1998.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 105–55, title I, §6(c), Oct. 7, 1997, 111 Stat. 1181, provided that: "This section [enacting this section] is effective for fiscal years beginning on and after October 1, 1997."