alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
296 Ga. 492

FINAL COPY

S15Y0372. IN THE MATTER OF RAND J. CSEHY.

PER CURIAM.

In April 2014, Rand J. Csehy (StateBar No. 199756) pled nolo contendere

to two counts of possession of a controlled substance, OCGA § 16-13-30, and

one count of possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, OCGA

§ 16-11-106. He was sentenced as a first offender. Csehy filed a petition for

voluntary discipline seeking a one-to-two-year suspension. On September 15,

2014, while his petition was pending, the Superior Court of Cobb County,

noting during an appearance that Csehy was disheveled and unable to stand

without support, ordered a drug test, which showed the presence of illegal drugs

in his system. The court held him in contempt and incarcerated him for five

days. Immediately thereafter, the State Bar filed an amendment to its response

to Csehy’s petition, requesting that it be denied and that a special master be

appointed. This Court appointed a special master, John Wayne Moulton, on

September 24, 2014. On October 6, 2014, this Court issued an opinion rejecting

Csehy’s petition for voluntary discipline, see In the Matter of Csehy, 295 Ga.
853 (764 SE2d 540) (2014). On October 29, 2014, the special master convened

a hearing in Csehy’s case, but Csehy failed to appear. The special master issued

his report and recommended that, because Csehy was convicted of three

felonies, he should be disbarred, see Bar Rule 8.4 (a) (2) (violation of Bar Rules

for lawyer to be convicted of felony) and Bar Rule 8.4 (b) (1) (ii) (conviction

includes an accepted plea of nolo contendere) of the Georgia Rules of

Professional Conduct, Bar Rule 4-102 (d). 

We have reviewed the entire record of the proceedings and agree with the

special master that disbarment is the appropriate sanction. Accordingly, the

name of Rand J. Csehy hereby is removed from the rolls of persons entitled to

practice law in the State of Georgia. He is reminded of his duties under Bar

Rule 4-219 (c).

Disbarred. All the Justices concur. 

Decided February 2, 2015.

Disbarment.

Graham & Jensen, Jason W. Graham, for Csehy.

Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel Stare Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman,

Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

2
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-186 FOR IMMEDIATAE RELEASE

(Wednesday, September 1, 1999)

Note to Editors:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has

scheduled meetings of several of its subcommittees September 22-24 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meetings, which are open to the public, will be held in room T-2B3 of the agency’s

Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike.

The subcommittee on materials and metallurgy will meet on September 22 at 1:00 p.m.

to review the NRC staff’s proposed revision to 10 CFR 50.55a of the Commission’s regulations,

entitled, “Codes and standards,” which eliminates the requirement to update in-service

inspection and testing programs every 120 months.

The subcommittees on reliability and probabilistic risk assessment and on regulatory

policies and practices will hold a joint meeting September 23-24. It will review proposed

revisions to the NRC’s probabilistic risk assessment implementation plan, and the proposed

rulemaking plan for development of risk-informed revisions to Part 50 of the Commission’s

regulations. The meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. on September 23, and at 8:30 a.m. on

September 24. Those who seek additional information or schedule updates about this meeting

should contact Michael Markley, at 301-415-6885.

The subcommittee on plant license renewal will meet on September 23 to review the

status of the generic aging lessons-learned program, the license renewal process and the

proposed format of renewal applications. The meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. and last until

noon. Those who seek additional information or schedule updates about this meeting should

contact Noel Dudley, at 301-415-6888.

Other aspects of the meeting will be described in an upcoming edition of the Federal

Register. ACRS meeting notices, transcripts and letter reports are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

###
```

[106th Congress Public Law 343]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ343.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1317]]

Public Law 106-343
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act for commencement of 
the construction of the Arrowrock Dam Hydroelectric Project in the State 
             of Idaho. <<NOTE: Oct. 19, 2000 -  [S. 1236]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY 
                            COMMISSION PROJECT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise 
apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 4656, 
the Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the project and 
after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the 
Commission's procedures under that section, extend the time period 
during which the licensee is required to commence the construction of 
the project for three consecutive 2-year periods.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of 
the expiration of the extension issued by the Commission prior to the 
date of the enactment of this Act under section 13 of the Federal Power 
Act (16 U.S.C. 806).
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a) 
has expired prior to the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Commission shall reinstate the license effective as of the date of its 
expiration and the first extension authorized under subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of such expiration.

    Approved October 19, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1236:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106-630 (Comm. on Commerce).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 106-170 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 145 (1999):
                                    Nov. 19, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.
                                                        Vol. 146 (2000):
                                    May 22, considered and passed House, 
                                        amended.
                                    Oct. 5, Senate concurred in House 
                                        amendment.

                                  <all>
```
§ 122.37 Precleared aircraft. ( a ) *Application.* This section applies when aircraft carrying crew, passengers and baggage, or merchandise which has been precleared pursuant to § 148.22 of this chapter at a location listed in § 101.5 of this chapter and makes an unscheduled or unintended landing at an airport in the U.S.
( b ) *Notice.* The aircraft commander or agent shall give written notice to the Customs office at: ( 1 ) The intended place of unlading; and
( 2 ) The place of preclearance.
( c ) *Time of notice.* Notice shall be given within 7 days of the unscheduled or unintended landing unless other arrangements have been made in advance between the carrier and the port director.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-36 June 13, 2000

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING NEAR VOGTLE PLANT

ON CHANGES IN REACTOR OVERSIGHT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for Monday, June 26 to

discuss the new reactor oversight process which began at Southern Nuclear Operating Company’s

Vogtle nuclear power plant, near Waynesboro, Georgia, in April.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. EDT in Room 201 (Commissioner Meeting Room) of the

Burke County Courthouse in Waynesboro, and members of the public will have the opportunity to ask

questions during the meeting.

The new oversight process uses more objective, timely, and safety-significant criteria in

assessing performance, while seeking to more effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. Under

the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based personnel are

supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators. These

performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant operations, including the viability of

redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection, and security measures.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC's web site every three months. The safety significance of each inspection finding or performance

indicator is characterized by a color -- green, white, yellow, or red.

The NRC response to the inspection findings and performance indicators will be based on the

significance of the items. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow, or red

assessments receive increasing NRC involvement. Multiple red findings could result in a plant

shutdown.

A plain language summary of the reactor oversight process is available from the NRC Office of

Public Affairs or on the web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

###
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-111 September 29, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC, COMPANIES TO DISCUSS DECOMMISSIONING WORK AT PA. REACTOR

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

representatives of the Saxton Nuclear Experimental Facility on

Monday, October 5, to discuss the upcoming removal and shipment

of large components from the permanently shutdown reactor,

located near the town of Saxton in Bedford County, Pa. That

work is expected to take place this fall.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 1 p.m. in Room

12-B-4 of the One White Flint North building at NRC

headquarters, 11555 Rockville Pike in Rockville, Md. It will

be open to the public for observation.

Owned by GPU Nuclear Inc. and the Saxton Nuclear

Experiment Corporation, the 35-megawatt plant operated from

1962 to 1972 as a research reactor for the nuclear power

industry. It is currently being decommissioned.

In April, the NRC granted a license amendment to the

plant’s owners allowing major decommissioning work to begin.

These activities include the removal of large components -- the

reactor vessel, steam generator and pressurizer -- and the

dismantlement of the containment building, the domed structure

that surrounds the reactor. Once removed, the large components

will be shipped to a low-level radioactive waste facility for

disposal.

The decommissioning of the plant is projected to cost

about $22 million and be completed in 2000.

#
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 720 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 720

   To encourage States to permit members of the Armed Forces who are 
    outside of the State under orders to renew a permit to carry a 
      concealed firearm through the mail, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 11, 2021

  Mr. Hawley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To encourage States to permit members of the Armed Forces who are 
    outside of the State under orders to renew a permit to carry a 
      concealed firearm through the mail, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``U.S. Military Right to Carry Act''.

SEC. 2. CONCEALED CARRY RENEWALS BY MAIL FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
              FORCES.

    (a) In General.--A State that receives funds under subpart 1 of 
part E of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 
1968 (34 U.S.C. 10151 et seq.) shall have in place--
            (1) a law or policy that permits a member of the Armed 
        Forces who is a resident of the State and who is outside of the 
        State under orders to renew a permit to carry a concealed 
        firearm through the mail; and
            (2) a law or policy that treats a member of the Armed 
        Forces on active duty in the State as a resident of the State 
        for purposes of issuing a permit to carry a concealed firearm 
        in the State.
    (b) Reduction in Funds.--Beginning in the first fiscal year that 
begins after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General 
shall, with respect to the amount that a State would otherwise receive 
under the grant program described in subsection (a)--
            (1) reduce such amount by 5 percent in the case of a State 
        that fails to comply with the requirement under subsection 
        (a)(1); and
            (2) reduce such amount by 5 percent in the case of a State 
        that fails to comply with the requirement under subsection 
        (a)(2).
    (c) Reallocation.--The Attorney General shall reallocate amounts 
not awarded to a State pursuant to subsection (b) to States that comply 
with the requirement under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or vld@nrc.gov

I-96-50

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Victor Dricks July 26, 1996

NRC STAFF PROPOSES TO FINE BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.

$50,000 FOR ALLEGED VIOLATIONS AT CALVERT CLIFFS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a

$50,000 fine against Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. (BG&E) for

violations of NRC fire protection requirements at its Calvert

Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant in Lusby, Maryland.

NRC bases this action on two violations found during an

inspection conducted May 8-10.

One violation was BG&E's failure, before an inspection in

1992, to implement a plan for limiting damage to equipment in one

emergency switchgear room if a fire should occur in another

similar room. (Both rooms, which contain equipment needed for

safe shutdown of the plant, share a ventilation system with

common ducting and fire dampers.)

The second violation involved BG&E's failure to verify

adequately the corrective actions it took after the matter was

brought to its attention in the 1992 inspection. The utility did

not verify its corrective actions by detailed analysis until May

of this year.

In a letter to BG&E officials, NRC Region I Administrator

Thomas T. Martin said: "[T]he violations represent a breakdown

in the control of licensed activities that collectively represent

a potentially significant lack of attention toward licensed

responsibilities which resulted in your failure, for an extended

period of time, to demonstrate that the safe shutdown equipment

criteria had been met."

The $50,000 proposed fine is the base civil penalty for

this level of violation. The company has 30 days to either pay

the proposed fine or to request in writing that part, or all of

it be withdrawn. It also has 30 days to admit or deny the

alleged violations.

####
### §130. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §111, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 777

Section, Pub. L. 87–730, §103, Oct. 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 693; H. Res. 163, Mar. 19, 1975; Pub. L. 95–94, title I, §115, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 668, authorized payment of expenses of participation by House in interparliamentary institutions. See section 5581 of this title.

The repeal of this section is based on a part of section 2 of House Resolution No. 1047, Ninety-fifth Congress, Apr. 4, 1978, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–391.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Section 2 of House Resolution No. 1047, Ninety-fifth Congress, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–391, provided that the repeal is effective upon the enactment of House Resolution No. 1047 as permanent law, which was effected by Pub. L. 95–391, §111, effective Sept. 30, 1978.

#### Ninety-fifth Congress

Section 2 of House Resolution No. 1047, Ninety-fifth Congress, Apr. 4, 1978, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–391, provided that this section would not be effective in the Ninety-fifth Congress upon the adoption of H. Res. 1047.

#### Authorization for Payment of Expenses from Contingent Fund of House of Representatives for Participatory Activities

Section 1 of House Resolution No. 434, Ninety-fifth Congress, Mar. 31, 1977, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–94, title I, §115, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 668, which provided that, until otherwise provided by law, there was to have been paid out of the contingent fund of the House of Representatives such sums as may have been necessary, but not to exceed $15,000 in any calendar year, for the payment of expenses incurred in carrying out this section, was repealed by section 2 of H. Res. 1047, Ninety-fifth Congress, Apr. 4, 1978, which was enacted into permanent law by section 111 of Pub. L. 95–391, effective Sept. 30, 1978.
#### § 7.15 Judicial review.

Action taken pursuant to section 602 of the Act is subject to judicial review as provided in section 603 of the Act.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-28 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, February 17,

1998)

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, MARCH 5-6

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on

Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a technical meeting March

5-6 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in

Conference Room 2B3 in the NRC's Two White Flint North Building

at 11545 Rockville Pike.

Although meetings of the ACRS are open, they are not part of

the NRC's public hearing process. The ACRS, an advisory group to

the Commission, conducts independent, highly technical reviews of

safety considerations related to nuclear facilities. While

anyone may attend, the committee will consider only oral or

written statements arranged in advance and limited to specific

matters set forth in a Notice of Meeting published in an upcoming

edition of the Federal Register.

The meeting may include closed sessions, if required, to

discuss proprietary or personnel information.

Here is the complete meeting agenda:

THURSDAY, MARCH 5

8:30 to 8:35 a.m. -- Opening remarks by ACRS chairman.

8:45 to 10:30 a.m. -- Discussions with NRC staff on

strategy for the development of the NRC research program.

10:50 a.m. to 12:00 noon -- Discussions with NRC staff on

prioritization of research needs.

1:00 to 2:00 p.m. -- Discussion with NRC research staff on

core capabilities needed to respond to future needs.
-2-

2:00 to 3:00 p.m. -- Confirmatory research activities.

3:15 to 5:00 p.m. -- Discussions with NRC research staff

on current activities and anticipated severe-accident research

activities. The committee will also discuss the drive toward

risk-informed regulation.

5:00 to 5:30 p.m. -- Open discussion.

FRIDAY, MARCH 6

8:35 to 9:30 a.m. -- Discussions with NRC staff of the

results of the Individual Plant Examinations and Individual Plant

Examinations of Externally Initiated Events.

9:30 to 10:30 a.m. -- Meeting with NRC Commissioner Nils

J. Diaz.

10:50 to 12:00 noon -- Discussion with NRC research staff

regarding the risk significance and vulnerabilities of agency

programs. The committee will also discuss goals and research

needs.

1:00 to 7:00 p.m. -- Discussion of research needs by the

appropriate subcommittee chairmen.

##

Persons wishing to submit statements on any of these topics

may do so by providing a readily reproducible copy to the

committee or by mailing it to the Executive Director, Advisory

Committee on Reactor Safeguards, Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001.

(ACRS meeting schedules are subject to change. Anyone

planning to attend should confirm the schedule the day before the

meeting by calling (301) 415-5024.

ACRS meeting notices, meeting transcripts, and letter

reports are now available on the Internet at

www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

##
§ 147.1 Definitions. The following are general definitions for the purposes of part 147: ( a ) *The Act.* “The Act” means the Trade Fair Act of 1959. (Secs. 2-7, 73 Stat. 18, 19; 19 U.S.C. 1751-1756.)
( b ) *Fair.* “Fair” means a fair, exhibition, or exposition designated by the Secretary of Commerce pursuant to the Trade Fair Act.
( c ) *Fair operator.* “Fair operator” means the party named by the Secretary of Commerce as the operator of the fair.
( d ) *Port.* “Port” means the port at which the fair is to be held, or if the fair is not to be held within the limits of a port, the port nearest to the location of the fair.
( e ) *Closing date.* “Closing date” means the date designated by the Secretary of Commerce as the date when the fair will close, including any extension granted by the Secretary of Commerce, or, if the fair closes earlier, the date on which the fair actually closes.
( f ) *Articles for a fair.* “Articles for a fair” includes, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) Actual exhibit items;
( 2 ) Pamphlets, brochures, and explanatory material in reasonable quantities relating to foreign exhibits at a fair;
( 3 ) Material for use in constructing, installing, or maintaining foreign exhibits at a fair.
[T.D. 70-134, 35 FR 9268, June 13, 1970, as amended by T.D. 82-145, 47 FR 35478, Aug. 16, 1982]