alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§823 to 829. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–300, title I, §184(a)(1), Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1357

Section 823, Pub. L. 93–203, title I, §121, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1934, related to conditions applicable to all programs under this chapter.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former section 983 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 824, Pub. L. 93–203, title I, §122, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1938, and amended Pub. L. 96–583, §3(a), Dec. 23, 1980, 94 Stat. 3376, related to special conditions applicable to public service employment.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former section 848 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 825, Pub. L. 93–203, title I, §123, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1941, set out various administrative provisions applicable to this chapter.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former sections 813 and 984 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 826, Pub. L. 93–203, title I, §124, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1943, related to wages and allowances applicable to all activities financed under this chapter.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former section 821 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 827, Pub. L. 93–203, title I, §125, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1944, related to labor standards for all laborers and mechanics employed on works that are federally assisted under this chapter.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former section 986 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 828, Pub. L. 93–203, title I, §126, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1944, related to various powers of the Secretary under this chapter.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former section 982 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 829, Pub. L. 93–203, title I, §127, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1945; amended Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §508(h)(2), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 693, related to various reports to be made by Federal agencies regarding programs, activities, etc., under this chapter.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former sections 849 and 985 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Stanley Black, Appellant.

*739Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Santry and Bergan, JJ., concur.
#### GRAY, Respondent, v. GRAY, Appellant.

(190 N. W. 1015.)

(File No. 5157.

Opinion filed December 12, 1922.)

Appeal and Error — Briefs—Appeal Deemed Abandoned 011 Failure to File Brief or Stipulation Extending Time for Filing Within Required Period.

Where no briefs, stipulations, or other papers have been filed by the appellant within the required period after notice- -of appeal, the appeal will be deemed abandoned; and the order appealed from will be affirmed.

*101Appeal from Circuit Court, Brown County; Hon. B. A. Warton, Judge.

Action by Cora R. Gray against Lewis Gray. From an order overruling a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint, the defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*Harkin, Crane & Noll,*of Aberdeen, for Appellant.

*Campbell & Fletcher,*of Aberdeen, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

On May 26, 1922, notice of appeal was filed in this court in the above-entitled action. By. stipulation filed the time for serving and filing appellant’s brief was extended to August 1, 1922. Since that date no briefs, stipulations, or other, papers have been filed by appellant.

Appellant being in default, the appeal will be deemed abandoned, and the order appealed from will be affirmed.

Note — Reported in 190 N. W. 1015. See American Key-Numbered Digest, Appeal and Error, Key-No. 773 (4), 3 C. J. Sec. 1607.
PUBLIC NOTICE

The Shelby County Health Department

– Pollution Control Section (SCHD) is accepting public comments on an application concerning proposed amendments to the state implementation plan (SIP). The amendments are to incorporate the proposed Shelby County Eight

- h our Ozone Redesignation Request and

Maintenance Plan (2015 SCRRAMP) into the SIP.

Shelby County in Tennessee, Crittenden County in Arkansas, and the northern urbanized portion of Desoto County in Mississippi were designated non

attainment for the 2008 ozone N ational A mbient A ir Q uality S tandard effective on July 20, 2012 (77 FR 3008 8) with a classification of marginal. Local ozone data

over 2012 to 2014 demonstrates the area now meets the standard . Therefore, the SCHD is requesting the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to redesignate

the area to attainment under this standard. In addition, the SCHD is submitting a Maintenance Plan to keep the area in attainment for 10 years.

Copies of the proposed SIP amendment are available for public inspection at the

SCHD office during normal business hours . In addition, an electronic copy o f the proposal along with all technical support documents can be found at the following ftp site: https://xfer.shelbycountytn.gov/ The username and password are both ‘ public ’

.

A public hearing regarding this matter has be en scheduled at the SCHD

Auditorium at 814 Jefferson Avenue Memphis, TN on December 15 , 20 15 at 5 : 3 0

pm. C omments received will be distributed to members of the Tennessee Air

Pollution Control Board for their review prior to their approval and subsequent

submission to the EPA . Written comments should be addressed to:

Mr. Robert Rogers, Technical Manager

Pollution Control Section Shelby County Health Department 814 Jefferson Ave., 4 th Floor Memphis, TN 38105 (e

- mail bob.rogers@shelbycountytn.gov )

Individuals with disabilities who wish to review this information should contact the SCHD to discuss any auxiliary aids, accommodations or services needed to

facilitate such review.

Questions concerning these documents may be addressed to Mr. Bob Rogers at the above address or by calling (901) 222

- 9599

.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

125910 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan COUNTY ROAD AS SOCIATION OF Robert P. Young, Jr. MICHIGAN and CHIPPEWA COUNTY Stephen J. Markman, ROAD COMMISSION, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and

MICHIGAN PUBLIC TR ANSIT ASSOCIATION, ANN ARBOR TR ANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, CAPITAL AREA TRANSPORTATION AU THORITY, and SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, Intervening Plain tiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 125910 COA: 245931 Ingham CC: 02-000308-CZ

GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, STATE BU DGET DIRECTOR, STATE TREASURER, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, SECRETAR Y OF STATE, and STATE OF MICHIGAN, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of September 30, 2004, the application for le ave to appeal the January 13, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals wa s held in abeyance pending the decision in County Rd Ass’n of Michigan v Governor (Docket No. 125665). On order of the Court, the opinion having been issued on Nove mber 8, 2005, 474 Mich 11 (2005), the application for leave to appeal is again c onsidered, and it is DENI ED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Shore Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott C. Harvard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Scott C. HarvardScott C. HarvardPresident and Chief Executive Officer




Date: March 24, 2004



This certificate accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and will not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit No.
32.1


Truewest
Corporation


File
No.  33-56574


Form
10-Q


Quarter
ended December 31, 2009





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Truewest Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn A.
Little, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
      February 8, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Glenn A. LittleGlenn
      A. LittleChief
      Executive Officerand
      Chief Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Truewest Corporation and will be retained by Truewest Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 315.12 Adjustment Proposal requirements. EDA evaluates Adjustment Proposals based on the following: ( a ) The Adjustment Proposal must include a description of any Adjustment Assistance requested to implement such proposal, including financial and other supporting documentation as EDA determines is necessary, based upon either: ( 1 ) An analysis of the Firm's problems, strengths, and weaknesses and an assessment of its prospects for recovery; or
( 2 ) If EDA so determines, other available information;
( b ) The Adjustment Proposal must: ( 1 ) Be reasonably calculated to contribute materially to the economic adjustment of the Firm (*i.e.,* that such proposal will constructively assist the Firm to establish a competitive position in the same or a different industry);
( 2 ) Give adequate consideration to the interests of a sufficient number of separated workers of the Firm, by providing, for example, that the Firm will: ( i ) Give a rehiring preference to such workers;
( ii ) Make efforts to find new work for a number of such workers; and
( iii ) Assist such workers in obtaining benefits under available programs; and
( 3 ) Demonstrate that the Firm will make all reasonable efforts to use its own resources for its recovery, though under certain circumstances, resources of related Firms or major stockholders will also be considered; and
( c ) The Adjustment Assistance identified in the Adjustment Proposal must consist of specialized consulting services designed to assist the Firm in becoming more competitive in the global marketplace. For purposes of this paragraph (c), Adjustment Assistance generally consists of knowledge-based services such as market penetration studies, customized business improvements, and designs for new products. Adjustment Assistance does not include expenditures for capital improvements or for the purchase of business machinery or supplies.
§ 122.35 Emergency or forced landing. ( a ) *Application.* This section applies to emergency or forced landings made by aircraft when necessary for safety or the preservation of life or health, when such aircraft are: ( 1 ) Travelling from airport to airport in the U.S. under a permit to proceed (see §§ 122.52, 122.54 and 122.83(d)), or a Customs Form 7509 (see § 122.113); or
( 2 ) Coming into the U.S. from a foreign area.
( b ) *Notice.* When an emergency or forced landing is made, notice shall be given: ( 1 ) To the Customs Service at the intended place of first landing, nearest international airport, or nearest port of entry, as soon as possible;
( 2 ) By the aircraft commander, other person in charge, or aircraft owner, who shall make a full report of the flight and the emergency or forced landing.
( c ) *Passengers and crewmembers.* The aircraft commander or other person in charge shall keep all passengers and crewmembers in a separate place at the landing area until Customs officers arrive. Passengers and crewmembers may be removed if necessary for safety, or for the purpose of contacting Customs.
( d ) *Merchandise and baggage.* The aircraft commander or other person in charge shall keep all merchandise and baggage together and unopened at the landing area until Customs officers arrive. The merchandise and baggage may be removed for safety or to protect property.
( e ) *Mail.* Mail may be removed from the aircraft, but shall be delivered at once to an officer or employee of the Postal Service.
#### § 113.72 Bond condition to pay court costs (condemned goods).

A bond to pay court costs (condemned goods) must contain the condition listed in this section and must be a single transaction bond.

Bond Condition To Pay Court Costs (Condemned Goods)

If any seized goods belonging to principal are condemned the obligors (principal and surety, jointly and severally) agree to pay all costs of the condemnation proceedings.

[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984, as amended by T.D. 88-72, 53 FR 45902, Nov. 15, 1988; CBP Dec. 15-15, 80 FR 70169, Nov. 13, 2015]
#### Benjamin Gortikov v. Marion Gortikov.

Motion denied. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.884 Declaration. ( a ) *General.* An importer who claims preferential tariff treatment on a non-originating cotton or man-made fiber good specified in § 10.882 of this subpart must submit, at the request of the Center director, a declaration supporting such a claim for preferential tariff treatment that sets forth all pertinent information concerning the production of the good, including: ( 1 ) A description of the good, quantity, invoice numbers, and bills of lading;
( 2 ) A description of the operations performed in the production of the good in the territory of one or both of the Parties;
( 3 ) A statement as to any yarn or fabric of a non-Party and the origin of such materials used in the production of the good.
( b ) *Retention of records.* An importer must retain all documents relied upon to prepare the declaration for a period of five years.
gthp_ex10-62





  Exhibit 10.62







 



AMENDED FINDER'S FEE AGREEMENT



 


THIS
AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED FINDER'S FEE AGREEMENT IS DATED JUNE 11,
2020 (the Effective Date")


BETWEEN:


 


Guided
Therapeutics Inc., a US registered public company incorporated in
the State of Delaware with a registered and records office at 5835
Peachtree Corners East, Suite B Norcross GA 30092.


("the
Company")


 


AND


 


Fieldhouse
Capital Management Inc., a British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan,
Manitoba, and Ontario Registered Exempt Market dealer with a
registered and records office at 230 -11 Mainland St., Vancouver,
BC V6B 5L1..


("the
Finder")


 


The
Company and the Finder hereby amend the Finder's Agreement
previously entered into by the parties
on or about April 10, 2019 in the following regards:


 


WHEREAS:


 


A.
The parties entered into an Amended Finder's Fee Agreement dated on
or about May 22, 2020 in regards to a completed Series D Financing
in December 2019 and the Company is in the process of closing a
2020 Series E Preferred Share Financing. which the parties agree is
to be further amended.


 


B.
Unchanged.


 


C.
Unchanged.


 


1.
FINDER SERVICES AND FEES 1.1-1.3 Unchanged


 


1.4
Finder's Fees. The Company agrees to provide the following
consideration to the Finder:


 


(a)
As an approved Finder, payment in cash consisting of:


 


i)
Five Percent (5%) of the gross proceeds raised ("GPR") from all
accepted subscription agreements for the 2020 Series E Preferred
Share financing ("2020 Financing") from investors introduced to the
Company by the Finder (the "Fee").


 


ii)
Two percent (2%) from the 2019 Series D financing only (which
amounts to $15,260 based on gross proceeds of
$763,000).


 


iii)
Based on the GPR by Finder, there shall be a payment to Finder
based on the percentages and caps shown in the table below from the
exercise of any warrants for the period of 3 years after the 2020
Financing that have been or will be issued in connection with this
and prior financings and debt settlements ("warrant exercise
commissions"); provided however that warrant exercise commissions
shall expire three (3) years from the close of the 2020
Financing.


 


 


 




 








 






 


b)
Deleted


 


 


1.5.
Fee Payment Terms: The Fee shall be paid within 5 business days
after all funds have been received by the Company in the 2020
Financing.


 


1.6-1.7:
Unchanged.


 


2.
TERM OF AGREEMENT


 


2.1.
The term of this agreement shall be three (3) years from the close
of the 2020 Series E Financing.


 


3-9.
Unchanged. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Amendment has been executed by
the parties hereto on the Effective Date.


 


Guided
Therapeutics, Inc.


By:
/Gene Cartwright/


Title:
CEO & President


 


 


 


Fieldhouse
Capital Management, Inc


By:
/Douglas Sereda/


Title:
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Director
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-074 April 25, 2000

NRC ADDS TRANSNUCLEAR TN-68 FUEL STORAGE

CASK DESIGN TO APPROVED LIST

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is amending its regulations to add the Transnuclear TN68 cask system to the list of approved cask designs that utilities may use – under a general license and

without site-specific approval – to store spent fuel at their nuclear power plants.

Under the terms of an NRC general license, any nuclear power reactor licensee can use a preapproved cask if the company notifies the NRC in advance, meets the conditions of the cask’s NRC

certificate of compliance, and complies with NRC’s regulations. These regulations include a

requirement to ensure that the reactor site characteristics and potential site-boundary radiation limits

are within the scope of the cask’s safety analysis report and the reactor license.

The TN-68 certificate contains conditions for use that are similar to those for several other

NRC-approved casks. However, the certificate for each cask design may differ in some specifics, such

as operating procedures, training exercises and spent fuel specifications.

The NRC staff has also issued a safety evaluation report that finds that, if the conditions

specified in the certificate of compliance are met, adequate protection of public health and safety will

be maintained. The staff’s environmental assessment determined that use of the TN-68 cask design on

reactor sites would have no significant incremental impacts on the environment.

The rule will become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, expected

shortly.

###
STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

JOHN ELIAS BALDACCI DAVID P LITTELL

GOVERNOR September 11, 2009

David Conroy, Chief Air Programs Branch U .S. EPARegion I 1 Congress St ., Suite 1100 Boston, Ma. 02114-2023

Enclosed please find for your approval and inclusion into Maine's State Implementation Plan (SIP), Chapter 131, Cutback Asphalt and Emulsified Asphalt. Apublic hearing was held on June 18, 2009 in accordance with federal and state administrative requirements. Public notice of the hearing was published in the Kennebec Journal on May 16, 2009 and in newspapers statewide on May27, 2009 . On August 20, 2009, the Board of Environmental Protection adopted Chapter 131 . The following administrative materials are enclosed : 1 . Memorandum

to the Board of Environmental Protection requesting a public hearing dated April 16, 2009; 2. Copy ofthe public notice that appeared in the Kennebec Journal on May 16, 2009; 3. Memorandumto the Board of Environmental Protection requesting adoption of the rule, dated August 20, 2009; 4 . Chapter 131 Cutback Asphalt and Emulsified Asphalt as adopted by the Board of Environmental Protection on August 20, 2009 with an effective date of September 15, 2009; COMMISSIONER

AUGUSTA 17 STATE HOUSE STATION BANGOR PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0017 106 HOGAN ROAD 312 CANCO ROAD 1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK (207) 287-7688 FAX: (207) 287-7826 BANGOR, MAINE 04401 PORTLAND, MAINE 04103 PRESQUE ISLE, MAINE 04769-2094 RAY BLDG., HOSPITAL ST. (207) 941-4570 FAX: (207) 941-4584 (207) 822-6300 FAX: (207) 822-6303 (207) 764-0477 FAX: (207) 760-3143 we6 ene: HHw

.maine .Rov d,p printed on recvcled paper5. Summary of comments and the Department's response;

6. MAPA I form

for Chapter 131 which provides certification by the Commissioner that the hearing was held on June 18, 2009, the Board of Environmental Protection lawfully adopted this rule on August 20, 2009 and certification that the Attorney General approved the rule as to formand legality; and 7. The June 18, 2009 public hearing transcript . Should you have any questions, please contact Carolyn Wheeler at (207) 287-2437. Sincerely,

ames P . Brooks Director Bureau of Air Quality Enclosures cc: Anne Arnold Carolyn Wheelerw/o encl SIP file