alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 11—CITIZENS' COMMISSION ON PUBLIC SERVICE AND COMPENSATION**

Sec.
351.
Establishment.
352.
Membership.
353.
Executive Director; additional personnel; detail of personnel of other agencies.
354.
Use of United States mails.
355.
Administrative support services.
356.
Functions.
356a.
Omitted.
357.
Report by Commission to President with respect to pay.
358.
Recommendations of President with respect to pay.
359.
Effective date of recommendations of President.
360.
Effect of recommendations on existing law and prior recommendations.
361.
Publication of recommendations.
362.
Requirements applicable to recommendations.
363.
Additional function.
364.
Provision relating to certain other pay adjustments.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Region II

101 Marietta Street, Suite 2900

Atlanta, GA 30323

No. II-96-82 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Thursday, October 3, 1996)

Roger Hannah 404-331-7878

NRC SCHEDULES TWO MEETINGS AT FLORIDA POWER

CORPORATION'S CRYSTAL RIVER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled two meetings

for Wednesday, October 9, at Florida Power Corporation's Crystal

River nuclear power plant in Crystal River, Florida.

The first meeting, scheduled for 9:00 a.m., is a special NRC

inspection exit meeting to discuss NRC inspection findings

concerning a potential tampering event at Crystal River. That

meeting will be in the plant's Nuclear Administation Building

Conference Room 101.

On September 19, Crystal River employees discovered a coin

in a lube oil strainer for one of the plant's emergency diesel

generators. The exit meeting will cover the inspection related

to that event.

The second meeting, scheduled for 10:00 a.m., is a special

meeting requested by the NRC to dicuss FPC's corrective actions

to address weaknesses in engineering performance at the Crystal

River plant. That meeting will be in the same conference room as

the first meeting. Both meetings are open to public observation.

####
§ 107.1210 Payment of leverage fee upon receipt of commitment. ( a ) *Partial prepayment of leverage fee.* As a condition of SBA's Leverage commitment, and before you draw any Leverage under such commitment, you must pay to SBA a non-refundable fee equal to 1 percent of the face amount of the Debentures or Participating Securities reserved under the commitment. This amount represents a partial prepayment of the 3 percent leverage fee established under § 107.1130(a).
( b ) *Automatic cancellation of commitment.* Unless you pay the fee required under paragraph (a) of this section by 5:00 P.M. Eastern Time on the 30th calendar day following the issuance of SBA's Leverage commitment, the commitment will be automatically canceled.
[63 FR 5868, Feb. 5, 1998]
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-90 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 6
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-90 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of 6
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-90 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 3 of 6
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-90 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 4 of 6
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-90 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 5 of 6
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-90 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 6 of 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the registrant's financial statements included in its report on Form 10-Q for
the nine months ended September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements in such report.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         35,672
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  75,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                      5,379,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                461,279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              5,172,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                     3,184,902
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         337,500
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        5,215
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,444,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                5,172,495
<SALES>                                       500,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              500,795
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 258,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                1,368
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            152,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                87,554
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            87,554
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   87,554
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.48


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**pursuant to Section 302 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Heng Chuk, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Diametrics Medical, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to meby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 11, 2006
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-159 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Friday, October 24, 1997)

1NRC ISSUES PROPOSED RULE TO REDUCE INSURANCE

COVERAGE FOR SHUT-DOWN NUCLEAR REACTORS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing to amend its

regulations reducing on-site insurance liability coverage and

off-site financial protection requirements for nuclear power

plants that have been permanently shut down. The amendment is

being proposed because of the reduced risks associated with a

permanently shut-down plant, after an appropriate spent fuel

cooling period.

Currently, licensees at facilities permanently out of

service must request an exemption from the regulations in order

to obtain a reduced level of insurance coverage. The proposed

rule would eliminate the need for such an exemption.

Currently, licensees must obtain approximately $1 billion of

insurance to stabilize and decontaminate the reactor, and to

provide coverage for on-site damage in the event of an accident.

They are also required, under the Price-Anderson Act, to obtain a

minimum of $200 million for financial protection and to

participate in a secondary financial protection system against

damages and injuries which could occur off site.

Under the proposed rule, the amount of insurance coverage

required on site would be reduced downwards to $50 million or

less, and the amount of coverage required off site would be

reduced to $100 million or less. These amounts would be based on

certain configurations of the reactor and the spent fuel stored

on site. For instance, reactors with spent fuel in the storage

pool and fuel that is still above a certain temperature would

require more insurance than reactors that have no spent fuel in

the pool because of the possibility of a fuel cladding fire if

the pool is accidentally drained. In addition, sites with an

inventory of liquid radioactive waste, radioactive reactor

components, or contaminated structural material, may require

higher insurance coverage than sites without such materials.

The proposed rule will be published for comment shortly in

the Federal Register. Comments may be submitted electronically

through NRC's interactive rulemaking web site at
http://ruleforum.llnl.gov Comments may also be sent by mail to

the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,

D.C., 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.

#
02/08/201 0 09:1 9 FA I 310725681 6 AWP- 7 1100 2


### OcPTOFm ^ UNITE D STATE S O FAMERIC A DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC EO FEIEARING S WASHINGTON , B.C
. 

### pRIAIiON

Federa l Aviatio n Administration , *

Complainant ,
Su n Ques t

Executiv e Charter , Inc. ,

Respondent
. * * * *

I k 

### Docke t

No
. CP08WP000 4
NOTIC EOFAPPEA L

Attn : Appellat

e Docket Clerk , Federa

l Aviatio n Administratio n
COME S NOWth e Regiona

l Counsel fo

r th e Western-Pacifi c Region Federa l Aviatio n Administration (FAA) , andfiles her Notic e o f Appea l i n th e above-c^tione dmatter , pursuan t to Rule 13.23 3 o f

th e Rule s o f

Practic e fo

r FA A Civil Penalt

y Actions
. Respectfull

y submitted , Federa l Aviation Administratio n Western-Pacific Regio n Lawndaie , Californi a NAOM I TSUDA Regiona l Counse l

FE B 0 8 201 002/08/201 0 09:1 9 FA I 310725681 6 AWP- 7 12)00 3

Certificat e o f

Servic e 1 hereb y certif

y tha t o n thi s dat e I hav e sen t

b y facsimil e an dplace di n th e Unite dState s mail , postag e prepaid , th e execute dorigina l o f th e Notic e o f

Appeal , addresse da s fo l :ows : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington
. D C 2059 1 Attn : Appellat e Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W100 0 Facsimile : (202 ) 493-514 2 1 hereb y certif

y tha t o n thi s dat e I hav e sen t

b y facsimil e an dplace di n th e Unite dState s mail , postag e prepaid , acop y o f th e Notic e o f

Appeal , addresse da s follows : Arthu r Wasserman, Esq
. 1638 0 Rosco e Blvd. , Ste
. 12 0 VanNuys,C A 91406-12 2 J Facsimile : (818 ) 895-067 5 Administrativ e Law Judg e Richar dC
. Goodwi n Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E, , Eas t Bldg. , Roo mE12-:J20 Washington , D C 2059 0 I Facsimile : (202 ) 366-753 6 I further certif y tha t o n thi s dat e I hav e place di n th e Unite dState s mail , postag: e prepaid , ce)iifie dmail , atru e cop y o f th e above , addresse da s follows : Su n Ques t

Executiv e Ai r

Charter , Inc
. Attn ; Mark

Charle s Smith , Chie f

Pilo t 743 6 Hayvenhurs t

Ave
. VanNuys,C A 9140 6 Dated : FE

B .0 8 201 9

JeffKai4^r ^ ^ Legal Technicia n Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse ! Federal Aviatio n Administratio n Western-Pacifi c Regio n Lawndaie , Californi a
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Guy Bernstein,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|(1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
          applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  June 30, 2008 |  | /s/ Guy Bernstein

Guy BernsteinChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
#### Paul Orth and Others v. Max B. Kaesche and Others.

Motion for resettlement granted. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Exhibit 99.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-121865, 333-109817 and 333-98405 on Forms S-8 of our
reports dated April 13, 2012, relating to (1) the consolidated financial statements of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited and subsidiaries (the Company) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
explanatory paragraphs relating to i) the Companys adoption of the newly revised Republic of China Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 10, Accounting for Inventories; ii) the reconciliation to accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America; and iii) the convenience translation of New Taiwan dollar amounts into U.S. dollar amounts) and (2) the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting, appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011.







|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche
|Taipei, Taiwan       
|The Republic of China
|                     
|April 13, 2012
§ 12.107 Importations permitted. Pre-Columbian monumental or architectural sculpture or mural for which entry is sought into the Customs territory of the United States will be permitted entry if at the time of making entry: ( a ) A certificate, or its electronic equivalent, issued by the Government of the country of origin of such sculpture or mural, in a form acceptable to the Secretary, certifying that such exportation was not in violation of the laws of that country, is filed with the port director; or
( b ) Satisfactory evidence is presented to the port director that such sculpture or mural was exported from the country of origin on or before June 1, 1973; or
( c ) Satisfactory evidence is presented to the port director that such sculpture or mural is not an article listed in § 12.105.
[T.D. 73-119, 38 FR 10807, May 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 82-145, 47 FR 35477, Aug. 16, 1982; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61285, Oct. 13, 2015]
#### § 111.97--111.100 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23522]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--American Architectural Manufacturers 
Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 23, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Architectural 
Manufacturers Association (``AAMA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: American 
Architectural Manufacturers Association, Schaumburg, IL. The nature and 
scope of AAMA's standards development activities are: The development 
of standards and other technical specifications for fenestration, door, 
and related products.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23522 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 3281.14 What minimum requirements and terms must be incorporated into the unit agreement? ( a ) The unit agreement must, at a minimum: ( 1 ) State who the unit operator is, and that the unit operator and participating lessees accept the unit terms and obligations set forth in the agreement and applicable BLM regulations;
( 2 ) State the size and general location of the unit area;
( 3 ) Include procedures for revising the unit area or participating area(s);
( 4 ) Include procedures for amending the unit agreement;
( 5 ) State the effective date and term of the unit, as provided in paragraph (b) of this section;
( 6 ) Incorporate the minimum initial unit obligations, as specified in § 3281.15;
( 7 ) State that BLM may require a modification of the rate of resource exploration or development, or the production quantity or rate, within the unit area;
( 8 ) State that the agreement is subject to periodic BLM review;
( 9 ) State that BLM will deem the unit agreement as void as if it were never in effect if the minimum initial unit obligations are not met;
( 10 ) Include a plan of development; and
( 11 ) Include a unit contraction provision.
( b ) The unit agreement must provide that it terminates 5 years after its effective date unless: ( 1 ) BLM extends such date of expiration;
( 2 ) Unitized substances are produced or utilized in commercial quantities in which event the agreement continues for so long as unitized substances are produced or utilized in commercial quantities; or
( 3 ) BLM terminates the agreement under subpart 3285 of this part before the end of the 5 year period.
( c ) The agreement may include any other provisions or terms that BLM and the unit operator agree are necessary for proper resource exploration and development, and management of the unit area.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 175

**Question 175:** A health care worker serves in a dual nuclear medicine and radiology position. The worker wears a dosimeter on the waist and a dosimeter at the collar. During fluoroscopy procedures, which is the primary source of exposure, the worker wears a lead apron that covers the waist dosimeter, but not the collar dosimeter. Over the course of a year, the worker receives a dose of 5.2 rem as measured by the collar dosimeter and 1.7 rem as measured by the waist dosimeter.
> 
(a) Has the individual been overexposed?

(b) Can licensees take credit for shielding while monitoring the external dose component of the TEDE?

**Answer:**
> 
(a) Yes, the individual has received a dose in excess of 10 CFR 20.1201 limits. The head and neck constitute part of the "whole body", and in this case, received the highest exposure. The collar dosimeter measured a dose of 5.2 rem over the course of a year. If the head and neck were not shielded, and if the collar dosimeter was a measurement of the dose to the head and neck, then the dose exceeded the limit of 5 rem TEDE.

(b) The licensee can only "take credit" for shielding if it can be shown that the dose monitored behind the shielding is an accurate measurement of the maximum deep dose equivalent to the individual. Many shields used for radiation protection do not cover all of the upper legs, upper arms, and/or neck, and few if any shields protect the head from external radiation. Therefore, few shields would satisfy the conditions for credit. However, licensees should use shielding as necessary to minimize the area of exposure and keep doses ALARA.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1201)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, November 08, 2017
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Gondwana Energy Ltd. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Cameron Fink, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.
|    |                                                                                                                                                                  
|    | Dated this 9th day of February, 2006.                                                                                                                            

/s/ Cameron Fink Cameron Fink
      Chief Executive Officer


---