alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-72 August 26, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC BANS FORMER EXECUTIVE OF NEW JERSEY COMPANY

FROM LICENSED ACTIVITIES FOR THREE YEARS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a

confirmatory order banning a former executive of a Ewing

Township, N.J., company from NRC-licensed activities until July

1, 2001, for deliberately violating agency requirements. The

violations occurred while Stanislaw Piorek was Radiation Safety

Officer and Vice President of New Technology Development for

Metorex Inc.

The order is effective immediately.

The company holds two NRC licenses. One authorizes the

company to distribute generally licensed devices containing

radioactive material. The other authorizes the possession and

use of radioactive material in the form of sealed sources for

research and development; the manufacturing, repair and servicing

of analyzer devices; and the receipt of devices from customers

for disposal.

An NRC investigation was conducted in August 1998 after

the company’s then-president informed the agency that Metorex had

distributed the devices prior to obtaining the authorization to

do so. The investigation determined that Piorek deliberately

failed to stop shipments of X-ray fluorescence analyzer devices

from January through July 1998 even though he knew the company

was not authorized by the NRC to distribute them.

Additionally, NRC investigators determined that Piorek

deliberately failed to submit required quarterly reports to the

agency regarding the transfer of radioactive material for the

fourth quarter of 1997 and the first quarter of 1998.

Piorek cooperated with the NRC investigation and has

admitted that these violations occurred. In consenting to the

issuance of this confirmatory order, he has waived his right to a

hearing.

Any other person adversely affected by this order has 20

days to request a hearing.
The NRC also cited, but did not fine, the company for

three violations: unauthorized transfer of devices containing

radioactive material between October 1997 and July 1998;

deliberate failure to submit to the NRC required quarterly

reports; and having an individual who was no longer with the

company named as Radiation Safety Officer on the company’s NRCissued license.

In a letter to the company forwarding the notice of

violation, NRC Region I Administrator stated, “Were it not for

your identification (of the violations, which were reported to

the NRC by the company) and corrective actions, a civil penalty

would have been issued.”

#
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135737 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135737 COA: 271995 Van Buren CC: 06-015017-FC JOSEPH ANTHONY CINTRON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
§ 146.53 Shortages and overages. ( a ) *Report required.* The operator shall report, in writing, to the port director upon identification, as such, of any: ( 1 ) Theft or suspected theft of merchandise;
( 2 ) Merchandise not properly admitted to the zone; or
( 3 ) Shortage of one percent (1%) or more of the quantity of merchandise in a lot or covered by a unique identifier, if the missing merchandise would have been subject to duties and taxes of $100 or more upon entry into the Customs territory. The operator shall record upon identification all shortages and overages, whether or not they are required to be reported to the port director at that time, in its inventory control and recordkeeping system. The operator shall record all shortages and overages as required in the annual reconciliation report under § 146.25.
( b ) *Certain domestic merchandise.* Except in a case of theft or suspected theft, the operator need not file a report with the port director, or note in the annual reconciliation report, any shortage or overage concerning domestic status merchandise for which no permit is required.
( c ) *Shortage* — ( 1 ) *Operator responsibility.* The operator is responsible under its Foreign Trade Zone Operator's Bond for any loss of merchandise or for any merchandise which cannot be located or otherwise accounted for (except domestic status merchandise for which no permit is required), unless the port director is satisfied that the merchandise was: ( i ) Never received in the zone;
( ii ) Removed from the zone under proper permit;
( iii ) Not removed from the zone; or
( iv ) Lost or destroyed in the zone through fire or other casualty, evaporation, spillage, leakage, absorption, or similar cause, and did not enter the commerce of the U.S.
( 2 ) *Liability for duty and taxes.* Upon demand of the port director, the operator shall make entry for and pay duties and taxes applicable to merchandise which is missing or otherwise not accounted for.
( d ) *Overage.* The person with the right to make entry shall file, within 5 days after identification of an overage, an application for admission of the merchandise to the zone on Customs Form 214 or file a Customs entry for the merchandise. If a Customs Form 214 or a Customs entry is not timely filed, and the port director has not granted an extension of the time provided, the merchandise shall be sent to general order.
( e ) *Damage.* The liability of the operator under its Foreign Trade Zone Operator's Bond may be adjusted for the loss of value resulting from damage to merchandise occurring in the zone. The operator shall segregate, mark, and otherwise secure damaged merchandise to preserve its identity as damaged merchandise.
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No.1 to the
annual report of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 20123
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Asaf Berenstin, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date:  December 31, 2014 | /s/ Asaf Berenstin           
|------------------------ | -----------------------------
|                         | Asaf Berenstin               
|                         | Chief Financial Officer      
|                         | (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                               2,582
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,159
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        101,983
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   107,557
<PP&E>                                              86,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                      33,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     160,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               39,486
<BONDS>                                             20,003
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               133
<OTHER-SE>                                          95,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       160,185
<SALES>                                            255,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   255,540
<CGS>                                              176,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      176,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     577
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     19,234
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7,693
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 11,541
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        11,541
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .85




</TABLE>
### §1193b. Reporting and disclosure requirements

The Secretary shall—

(1) prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to address reporting and disclosure requirements for pension-linked emergency savings accounts; and

(2) seek to prevent unnecessary reporting and disclosure for such accounts under this chapter, including for purposes of any reporting or disclosure related to pension plans required by this title or under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §803, as added Pub. L. 117–328, div. T, title I, §127(b)(1), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5323.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in par. (2), is classified generally to Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to plan years beginning after Dec. 31, 2023, see section 127(g) of Pub. L. 117–328, set out as an Effective Date of 2022 Amendment note under section 72 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
#### Mildred F. Shaw, Appellant, v. Peter W. Shaw, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

*984Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur,
§ 15.14 Vehicular and pedestrian traffic. ( a ) Drivers of all vehicles entering or while at Mt. Weather or the NETC must drive carefully and safely at all times and must obey the signals and directions of the Police/Security Force or other authorized officials and all posted traffic signs;
( b ) Drivers must comply with NETC parking requirements and vehicle registration requirements;
( c ) At both Mt. Weather and the NETC we prohibit: ( 1 ) Blocking entrances, driveways, walks, loading platforms, or fire hydrants on the property; and
( 2 ) Parking without authority, parking in unauthorized locations or in locations reserved for other persons, or parking contrary to the direction of posted signs.
( 3 ) Where warning signs are posted vehicles parked in violation may be removed at the owners' risk and expense.
( d ) The Administrator, Mt. Weather Executive Director, or the Assistant Administrator for the United States Fire Administration or designee may issue and post specific supplemental traffic directives if needed. When issued and posted supplemental traffic directives will have the same force and effect as if they were in these rules. Proof that a parked motor vehicle violated these rules or directives may be taken as prima facie evidence that the registered owner was responsible for the violation.
#### § 102.38 Other rights and services.

Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to entitle any person, as a right, to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which such person is not entitled under the Privacy Act.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/ 

ORDER REFERRING MOTION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636(b)(1)(A) and the Magistrate Judge Rules of the Local 

Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-styled case is referred to United States 

Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart to take all action as required by law on the following motion:

• Receiver’s First Application for Allowance and Payment of 

Professionals’ Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses for July 27, 

2020 – September 30, 2020 [ECF No. 438].

It shall be the responsibility of the parties in this case to note the name of Magistrate Judge 

Reinhart on all motions and submissions pertaining to the referenced motion.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 22nd day of December, 2020.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 451 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2020 Page 1 of 1
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10145

 Conference Calendar 

__________________

STANLEY W. STEPHENS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CARL SCHROEDER,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:95-CV-75-A

- - - - - - - - - -

June 28, 1995

Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

A district court may dismiss an in forma pauperis (IFP)

complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) if it

lacks an arguable basis in law or fact. Eason v. Thaler, 14 F.3d

8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994). 

To obtain relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must

prove that he was deprived of a federal constitutional or

statutory right and that the persons depriving him of that right

acted under color of state law. Daigle v. Opelousas Health Care
No. 95-10145

-2-

Inc., 774 F.2d 1344, 1348-49 (5th Cir. 1985); Hernandez v.

Maxwell, 905 F.2d 94, 95 (5th Cir. 1990). A private party is

generally considered to act under color of state law only in

certain circumstances, such as when that party is involved in a

conspiracy or participates in joint activity with state actors. 

Hobbs v. Hawkins, 968 F.2d 471, 480 (5th Cir. 1992). Stephens's

complaint does not allege that Schroeder is a state actor, or

that he engaged in joint activity or in a conspiracy with state

actors. 

Stephens's § 1983 claim has no basis in law or in fact. 

Furthermore, nothing in his brief indicates that a hearing or a

questionnaire would have developed a viable claim. Thus, the

district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing

Stephens's complaint as frivolous. Eason, 14 F.3d at 9. 

Stephens's appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. 

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

APPEAL DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-61429-CIV-SMITH

DANIEL ROBERT LEE,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. 

 /

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter came before the Court upon the Report of Magistrate Judge [DE 5], in which 

she recommends dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(b) for failure to prosecute the case and for failure to comply with the Court’s Order. Plaintiff 

has not filed any objections to the Report. Having reviewed, de novo, the Report and the record, 

and given that there are no objections, it is

ORDERED that:

1) The Report of Magistrate Judge [DE 5] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and

incorporated by reference into this Court’s Order.

2) Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED. 

3) This case is CLOSED. 

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 24th day of March, 2021.

cc: All Counsel of Record

Case 0:20-cv-61429-RS Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2021 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), American Society of Safety Engineers (“ASSE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: American Society of Safety Engineers, Des Plaines, IL. The nature and scope of ASSE's standards development activities are: To advance the technical, scientific, managerial and ethical knowledge and skills of occupational safety, health and environmental professionals.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-23513  Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, Brian J. Recatto, President and Chief Executive Officer, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services
Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: March 31, 2010



/s/    BRIAN J.
RECATTOBrian J. Recatto President and Chief Executive Officer