alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 31, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the EIFS Industry Members Association (“EIMA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: EIFS Industry Members Association, Morrow, GA. The nature and scope of EIMA's standards development activities are: as a standards development institution accredited by the American National Standards Institute (“ANSI”), EIMA developed, maintains and updates the ANSI/EIMA 99-A-2001 standards which provides the requirements for specifying and installing Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-23532  Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
EERE Information Center Programs and Offices Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version 

# Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts Preliminary Analytical Tools The U.S. Department of Energy prepared the analytical spreadsheets below for the preliminary analysis stage of its energy conservation standards rulemaking on fluorescent lamp ballasts.
Life-Cycle Cost ( Excel 16.0 MB ) National Impact Analysis ( Excel 43.9 MB ) Appendix 5C Test Data ( Excel 97 KB )



## Contact Information Linda Graves Project Manager 202- 586-1851

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov Content Last Updated: 04/30/2010 

# Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Fluorescent Lamp Ball... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standard s/residential/f...

1 of 1 5/5/2010 7:45 P M
#### § 112.1 Definitions.

When used in this part, the following terms shall have the meaning indicated:

*Carrier.* A “carrier” is one who undertakes to transport goods, merchandise or people.

*Cartman.* A “cartman” is one who undertakes to transport goods or merchandise within the limits of the port.

*Common carrier.* A “common carrier” is a carrier owning or operating a railroad, steamship, or other transportation line or route which undertakes to transport goods or merchandise for all of the general public who choose to employ him.

*Contract carrier.* A “contract carrier” is a carrier which undertakes to transport specific goods or merchandise for a specific person or group of persons, and is authorized to operate as such by any agency of the United States.

*District.* “District” means the geographic area in which the parties excepted by the last sentence of § 112.2(b)(2) may operate under their bonds without obtaining a cartage or lighterage license issued under this part. A listing of each district, and the ports thereunder, will be published on or before October 1, 1995, and whenever updated.

*Freight forwarder.* A “freight forwarder” is one who engages in the business of dispatching shipments on behalf of other persons, for a consideration, in foreign or domestic commerce between the United States, its territories or possessions, and foreign countries, and of handling the formalities incident to such shipments, and is authorized to operate as such by any agency of the United States.

*Lighterman.* A “lighterman” is one who transports goods or merchandise on a barge, scow, or other small vessel to or from a vessel within the port, or from place to place within a port.

*Private carrier.* A “private carrier” is a carrier of his own goods or merchandise.

[T.D. 73-140, 38 FR 13551, May 23, 1973, as amended by T.D. 95-77, 60 FR 50019, Sept. 27, 1995]
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 629 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 629

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to require Federal 
 agencies to submit to the Comptroller General of the United States a 
  report on rules that are revoked, suspended, replaced, amended, or 
                      otherwise made ineffective.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``GAO Database Modernization Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. RULES NO LONGER IN EFFECT.

    (a) In General.--Section 801(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(D) For any rule submitted under subparagraph (A), if the Federal 
agency promulgating the rule, in whole or in part, revokes, suspends, 
replaces, amends, or otherwise makes the rule ineffective, or the rule 
is made ineffective for any other reason, the Federal agency shall 
submit to the Comptroller General a report containing--
            ``(i) the title of the rule;
            ``(ii) the Federal Register citation for the rule, if any;
            ``(iii) the date on which rule was submitted to the 
        Comptroller General; and
            ``(iv) a description of the provisions of the rule that are 
        being revoked, suspended, replaced, amended, or otherwise made 
        ineffective.''.
    (b) Sunset.--Effective on the date that is 6 years after the date 
of enactment of this Act, section 801(a)(1) of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by striking subparagraph (D), as added by subsection 
(a).

            Passed the Senate May 26, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 629

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to require Federal 
 agencies to submit to the Comptroller General of the United States a 
  report on rules that are revoked, suspended, replaced, amended, or 
                      otherwise made ineffective.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No.: 20-cv-61527-SINGHAL/Reid 

TAVON STONE,

Plaintiff,

v.

HALLANDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Lisette

Reid’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (DE [11]), filed on October 5, 2020. Therein, 

Magistrate Judge Reid sua sponte considered Plaintiff’s Complaint (DE [1]) and 

recommends this case be DISMISSED.

Parties have fourteen days to file any objections to a magistrate judge’s factual 

findings. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); S.D. Fla. Mag. R. 4(b). Here, neither side filed any 

such objections. Therefore, the Court’s review of the R&R is properly limited to a de novo 

review of only its legal conclusions. See Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London v. 

PharmaTech, LLC, 2019 WL 4673739, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 19, 2019) (“Legal conclusions

are reviewed de novo, even in the absence of an objection.”).

The Court has reviewed the R&R, the entire file, and the record. In so doing, the

Court has concluded a de novo review of Magistrate Judge Reid’s legal conclusions. 

Accordingly, it is

Case 0:20-cv-61527-AHS Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/21/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that United States Magistrate Judge Reid’s Report 

and Recommendation (DE [11]) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. The Complaint (DE [1]) 

is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case and DENY all pending 

motions as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 21st day of 

October 2020.

Copies to counsel via CM/ECF and Plaintiff, pro se

Case 0:20-cv-61527-AHS Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/21/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### § 123.503 When can you apply for a Military Reservist EIDL?

Your small business can apply for a Military Reservist EIDL any time beginning on the date your essential employee receives notice of expected call-up and ending one year after the date the essential employee is discharged or released from active service. The Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance (AA/DA) or designee may extend the one year limit by no more then one additional year after finding extraordinary or unforeseeable circumstances.

[73 FR 54675, Sept. 23, 2008, as amended at 88 FR 24110, Apr. 19, 2023]
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.3003 Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon importation. ( a ) *Basis of claim.* An importer may make a claim for CTPA preferential tariff treatment, including an exemption from the merchandise processing fee, based on either: ( 1 ) A written or electronic certification, as specified in § 10.3004, that is prepared by the importer, exporter, or producer of the good; or
( 2 ) The importer's knowledge that the good is an originating good, including reasonable reliance on information in the importer's possession that the good is an originating good.
( b ) *Making a claim.* The claim is made by including on the entry summary, or equivalent documentation, the letters “CO” as a prefix to the subheading of the HTSUS under which each qualifying good is classified, or by the method specified for equivalent reporting via an authorized electronic data interchange system.
( c ) *Corrected claim.* If, after making the claim specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the importer has reason to believe that the claim is based on inaccurate information or is otherwise invalid, the importer must, within 30 calendar days after the date of discovery of the error, correct the claim and pay any duties that may be due. The importer must submit a statement either in writing or via an authorized electronic data interchange system to the CBP office where the original claim was filed specifying the correction (*see* §§ 10.3031 and 10.3033).
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-96-20 May 22, 1996

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 708/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 708/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $50,000 FINE AGAINST DETROIT EDISON CO.

FOR VIOLATION OF NRC REQUIREMENTS AT FERMI 2 NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a

$50,000 fine against Detroit Edison Co. for a violation of NRC

requirements which occurred when equipment cooling water pumps at

the Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant were disabled by freezing weather

in February.

On February 5 a pump which provides cooling water to an

emergency diesel generator failed to operate properly during

routine testing. The inoperability of the pump was attributed to

the freezing weather conditions, but plant personnel did not

immediately recognize the possibility that other cooling water

systems for plant safety equipment might be affected by the

weather.

Plant personnel used air pressure to remove ice blockage

from the pump, and the pump was successfully tested later that

day.

Testing of other equipment cooling water pumps was not

performed until the next day, when a second diesel generator

cooling water pump operated erratically during initial testing.

This pump's failure was caused by a buildup of ice in the pump;

the ice blockage cleared after about 90 seconds, and the pump

then operated normally.

In notifying the utility of the proposed fine, NRC Regional

Administrator Hubert J. Miller stated that the utility's failure

to promptly identify the potential freezing problem for other

cooling water pumps could have affected all four emergency diesel

generators and other plant safety systems.

He said the fine was proposed because "the nonconservative

operating philosophy exhibited during the event resulted in the

increased duration of the problem and associated risks." The

failure to promptly address the potential of a common mode

failure for the equipment cooling pumps "represents particularly

poor licensee performance."

Detroit Edison has until June 20 to pay the fine or to

protest it. If the fine is protested and subsequently imposed by
the NRC staff, the utility may request a hearing.
**Exhibit
      32.1**


CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
          connection with the annual report of China
          Digital Communication Group (the
          "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
          with
          the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
          I, Xu
          Zhongnan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 1)
          The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2)
          The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
                August 6,
                2008
              By: */s/ Xu
                Zhongnan*Xu ZhongnanChief
                Executive
                Officer
#### In the Matter of Claude Ellis, as Executor of Cora E. Lewis, Deceased, Appellant, for an Order Annulling the Determination of New York State Board of Social Welfare, Respondent, in Refusing to Consent to the Incorporation of Lewis Memorial Home, Inc., and Directing said Board to Consent to said Incorporation.

Present — Taylor, P. J., McCum, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.1112 The decision. ( a ) *Timing.* The Judge shall decide a VOSB or SDVOSB Appeal, insofar as practicable, within 60 calendar days after close of the record.
( b ) *Contents.* Following closure of the record, the Judge will issue a decision containing findings of fact and conclusions of law, reasons for such findings and conclusions, and any relief ordered.
( c ) *Basis for decision.* Decisions under this subpart will be based primarily on the evidence in the SBA case file, arguments made on appeal, and any response(s) thereto. However, the Judge, in his/her sole discretion, may consider issues beyond those raised in the pleadings and the denial or cancellation letter.
( d ) *Finality.* The decision is the final agency decision and becomes effective upon issuance. Where OHA dismisses an appeal of a D/GC denial or decertification, the D/GC determination remains in effect.
( e ) *Service.* OHA will serve a copy of all written decisions on each party, or, if represented by counsel, on its counsel.
( f ) *Effect.* If the Judge grants the appeal and finds the appellant eligible for inclusion in the SBA certification database, the D/GC must immediately include in the SBA certification database.
( g ) *Reconsideration.* A decision of the Judge may be reconsidered. Any party that has appeared in the proceeding, or the SBA Administrator or his or her designee, may request reconsideration by filing with OHA and serving a petition for reconsideration on all parties to the VOSB or SDVOSB Appeal within twenty (20) calendar days after service of the written decision, upon a clear showing of an error of fact or law material to the decision. The Judge also may reconsider a decision on his or her own initiative.
#### § 63.7 Amount of coverage and deductible on effective date of condemnation or certification.

The amount of building coverage and the deductible applicable to a claim for benefits under section 1306(c) of the Act are what was in effect on the date of condemnation or the date of application for certification.

[53 FR 36975, Sept. 23, 1988, as amended at 53 FR 44193, Nov. 2, 1988]
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.106 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 579 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 579

 To make a technical correction to the ALS Disability Insurance Access 
                              Act of 2019.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 2021

  Mr. Braun (for himself, Mr. Coons, Mr. Cotton, and Mr. Whitehouse) 
 introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read 
                       the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make a technical correction to the ALS Disability Insurance Access 
                              Act of 2019.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RETROACTIVE ACCESS TO SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY BENEFITS 
              INDIVIDUALS WITH AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS (ALS).

    (a) In General.--Section 2(b) of the ALS Disability Insurance 
Access Act of 2019 (Public Law 116-250) is amended by striking 
``applications for disability insurance benefits filed after the date 
of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``applications for disability 
insurance benefits approved after the date that is 5 months before the 
date of enactment of this Act''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the ALS Disability Insurance 
Access Act of 2019 (Public Law 116-250).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 1, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I W. Kerry Jackson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  December 15, 2003 | By:  /s/ W. Kerry JacksonW. Kerry Jackson
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





---
# Úřední věstník C 18A/25.

| | ISSN 1725-5163 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 18A |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Svazek 4925. ledna 2006 |

ISSN 1725-5163

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 18A

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Svazek 4925. ledna 2006

---

| Oznámeníč. | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Oznámení |
| | Evropský úřad pro bezpečnost potravin |
| 2006/C 018A/1 | Výzva k vyjádření zájmu o členství ve vědeckém výboru a vědeckých komisích Evropského úřadu pro bezpečnost potravin (Lhůta pro vyjádření zájmu prodloužena do 17. února 2006) | 1 |

Oznámeníč.

Obsah

Strana

III   Oznámení

Evropský úřad pro bezpečnost potravin

2006/C 018A/1

Výzva k vyjádření zájmu o členství ve vědeckém výboru a vědeckých komisích Evropského úřadu pro bezpečnost potravin (Lhůta pro vyjádření zájmu prodloužena do 17. února 2006)

1

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

III Oznámení

Evropský úřad pro bezpečnost potravin

| 25.1.2006 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CA 18/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2006

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CA 18/1

---

VÝZVA K VYJÁDŘENÍ ZÁJMU O ČLENSTVÍ VE VĚDECKÉM VÝBORU A VĚDECKÝCH KOMISÍCH EVROPSKÉHO ÚŘADU PRO BEZPEČNOST POTRAVIN

(Lhůta pro vyjádření zájmu prodloužena do 17. února 2006)

(2006/C 18 A/01)

Jak bylo zveřejněno v 
  Úředním věstníku Evropské unie C 289A ze dne 22. listopadu 2005, s. 6, datem uzávěrky pro zaslání přihlášek je 7. leden 2006. Vzhledem ke zřejmým, opakujícím se problémům s on-line aplikacemi, zejména v průběhu posledního týdne doby vymezené pro podávání přihlášek, se však lhůta pro vyjádření zájmu prodlužuje do pátku 17. února 2006.

Tato výzva je určena zejména vědeckým odborníkům, kteří se chtějí ucházet o členství ve vědeckém výboru nebo v některé vědecké komisi Evropského úřadu pro bezpečnost potravin, jenž byl zřízen nařízením Evropského parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 178/2002 ze dne 28. ledna 2002, kterým se stanoví obecné zásady a požadavky potravinového práva, zřizuje se Evropský úřad pro bezpečnost potravin a stanoví postupy týkající se bezpečnosti potravin. Úřad má stálé sídlo v italské Parmě.

---