alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |
|--|

|  |  |
|--|--|

| ** ** |
|------------|

|   | ****Clergy and Laity Concerned About Vietnam**** 
258 pages

Excerpts from the file regarding this pacifist organization which participated in many anti-war, anti-draft activities during the Vietnam War era of the late 1960's and early 1970's.

**Part 1a**
               **Part 1b**

Introduction
Reading Room Index - A   B   C   D   E    F   G- H   I    J    K   L   M   N   -O   P   Q   R   S   T   U-V   W   X   Y   Z   
Electronic Reading Room
- Alphabetical Listing- Espionage-Famous Persons-Gangster Era- Historical Interest- Unusual Phenomena-Violent CrimeFBI              File Fact Sheet FOIA Request Instructions- FOIA Request Form - Privacy Waiver and Certificate of Identity Form Privacy Act Instructions- Privacy Act Request FormDOJ              Reference GuideU.S.              DOJ FOIASearch
All of these publications are in PDF (Portable Document Format). To view them you will need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader plug-in installed on your computer. The Reader can be downloaded at no cost from Adobe's site on the World Wide Web.   If you have difficulty accessing any material on this site because of a disability, please contact us in writing or via telephone and we will work with you to make the information available.

Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Section    202-324-5520 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-51 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, April 10, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on

Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a meeting on April 29 in Rockville,

Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will begin at 1:30 p.m. in

Room T-2B1, of the NRC's One White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike.

The Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will discuss proposed ACRS activities

and the qualification of candidates for appointment to ACRS.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for public comment, will

be described in a Notice of Meeting published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal

Register.

#
#### § 145.56 Foreign Assets Control.

Merchandise subject to regulations of the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Treasury Department prohibiting or restricting entry of unlicensed importations of articles directly or indirectly from certain designated countries shall be detained until licensed or the question of its release, seizure, or other disposition has been determined under the Foreign Assets Control or Cuban Assets Control regulations (31 CFR parts 500 and 515) (See also 19 CFR 12.150).

[T.D. 73-135, 38 FR 13369, May 21, 1973, as amended by T.D. 96-42, 61 FR 24889, May 17, 1996]
S. 5087 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two 

An Act 

To amend the Not Invisible Act of 2019 to extend, and provide additional support 

for, the activities of the Department of the Interior and the Department of 

Justice Joint Commission on Reducing Violent Crime Against Indians, and for 

other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF, AND ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR THE 

ACTIVITIES OF, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE JOINT COMMISSION ON REDUCING VIOLENT CRIME AGAINST INDIANS. 

(a) EXTENSION OF COMMISSION AND ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMISSION.—Section 4 of the Not Invisible Act of 2019 (Public Law 

116–166; 134 Stat. 767) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (c)(2)(B), by striking ‘‘18 months after 

the enactment’’ and inserting ‘‘36 months after the date of 

enactment’’; and 

(2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘2 years’’ and inserting 

‘‘42 months’’. 

(b) ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR ACTIVITIES OF COMMISSION.—Section 4(b) of the Not Invisible Act of 2019 (Public Law 116–166; 

134 Stat. 767) is amended— 

(1) in the subsection heading, by inserting ‘‘; OPERATION’’ 

after ‘‘MEMBERSHIP’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(7) GIFTS.—The Commission may accept and use gifts 

or donations of services or property from Indian tribes or Tribal 
S. 5087—2 

entities, academic institutions, or other not-for-profit organizations as it considers necessary to carry out the duties of the 

Commission described in subsection (c).’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 1, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I W. Kerry Jackson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  June 8, 2004 | By:  /s/ W. Kerry JacksonW. Kerry Jackson
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





---
### Official Meeting of the

National and Governmental Advisory Committees to the

U.S. Representative to the Commission for Environmental Cooperation

TELECONFERENCE AGEND A

Thursday

, April 25 , 201 3

12:00 p.m.

- 4 :00 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time)

1201 Constitution Ave. NW

Washington, DC 20460

~ DRAFT ~

12:00 p m Call to Order and Introductions

Oscar Carrillo, Designated Federal Officer , EPA

12 :0 5 p m Welcome and O verview of Agenda

Octaviana Trujillo , Chair of the Governmental Advisory Committee

Brian Houseal , Chair of the National Advisory Committee

12 :10 p m Opening Remarks

Cynthia Jones

- Jackson , Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee

Management & Outreach, (OFACMO) EPA

12 : 1 5 p m Update on U.S. Priorities & Guidance : Council Session

Michelle DePass

, Assistant Administrator

, International & Tribal Affairs, ( OI T A ) , EPA

12 : 35 p m Question & Answer Period

12:50 pm CEC Operational Plan Status, Goals for CEC Vision

Irasema Coronado

, Executive Director , CEC Secretariat

1:05 pm Question & Answer Period

1:20 pm Question & Answer Period on Operational Plan & NAPECA Grants

Sylvia Correa, Senior Advisor for North American Affairs OITA , EPA

1:35pm BREAK

1:4 5 p m Update on SEM Trilateral Review Taskforce

Jocelyn Adkins, OITA /OGC

2:0 0 p m Question & Answer Period

2:1 5 pm Public Comments PeriodThursday, April 25 , 201 3 Continued...

2:3 0 pm Update on A rticle 13 th SLAB Report

Rick Picardi, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response

2:4 5 pm Question & Answer Period

3:0 0 pm JPAC Report

- out

Dave Angus , Chair, Joint Public Advisory Committee

3:10 pm Question & Answer Period

3:25 pm BREAK

3:30 pm Committees Meet Separately

GAC stays in same room

NAC connects to separate electronic room

4:05 pm NAC/GAC Chairs Report

- outs

4 :15 pm ADJOURN
8/18/22, 8:32 AM KKM original warranty at time of purchase.png

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1XTi1m4E4vRciBOv2M9jpKoAbZJkbapHO 1/1

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
### §2232. Deposits in the Fund

#### (a) Gift Shop Account

There shall be deposited in the Gift Shop Account all monies received from sales and other services by the gift shop established under section 2215 of this title, together with any interest accrued on balances in the Account.

#### (b) Miscellaneous Receipts Account

There shall be deposited in the Miscellaneous Receipts Account each of the following (together with any interest accrued on balances in the Account):

(1) Any amounts deposited under section 2216(c) of this title.

(2) Any other receipts received from the operation of the Capitol Visitor Center.

(3) Any amounts described under section 2273(d) of this title.

(Pub. L. 110–437, title III, §302, Oct. 20, 2008, 122 Stat. 4989.)
### §2271. Jurisdictions unaffected

#### (a) Security jurisdiction unaffected

Nothing in this chapter granting any authority to the Architect of the Capitol or Chief Executive Officer shall be construed to affect the exclusive jurisdiction of the Capitol Police, the Capitol Police Board, the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate, and the Sergeant at Arms of the House of Representatives to provide security for the Capitol, including the Capitol Visitor Center.

#### (b) Architect of the Capitol jurisdiction unaffected

#### (1) In general

Nothing in this chapter granting any authority to the Chief Executive Officer shall be construed to affect the exclusive jurisdiction of the Architect of the Capitol for the care and superintendence of the Capitol Visitor Center. All maintenance services, groundskeeping services, improvements, alterations, additions, and repairs for the Capitol Visitor Center shall be made under the direction and supervision of the Architect, subject to the approval of the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate and the House Office Building Commission as to matters of general policy.

#### (2) Omitted

(Pub. L. 110–437, title V, §501, Oct. 20, 2008, 122 Stat. 4997.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 110–437, Oct. 20, 2008, 122 Stat. 4983, known as the Capitol Visitor Center Act of 2008, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2201 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 501 of Pub. L. 110–437. Subsec. (b)(2) of section 501 of Pub. L. 110–437 repealed section 1825 of this title.
### §2106. Procedures encouraged where not required

It is the sense of Congress that an employer who is not required to comply with the notice requirements of section 2102 of this title should, to the extent possible, provide notice to its employees about a proposal to close a plant or permanently reduce its workforce.

(Pub. L. 100–379, §7, Aug. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 894.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 6 months after Aug. 4, 1988, see section 11 of Pub. L. 100–379, set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-209 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, November 18, 1998)

NRC REOPENS PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ON PROPOSED CHANGES

TO MEDICAL POLICY STATEMENT, REGULATIONS, GUIDANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has reopened the public comment period until

December 16 on proposed revisions to its policy statement and regulations on medical uses of

radioactive material.

The Commission announced in August the details of the proposed revisions and invited

public comments on the proposals by November 12 for the regulations and November 13 for

the policy statement. The agency decided to reopen the invitation in response to a number of

concerns that the original 90-day period was too short for members of the public to thoroughly

review, understand and comment on the proposed changes.

Interested persons are invited to submit comments by December 16 to the Secretary,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings

and Adjudications Staff. Comments may also be submitted electronically via the NRC’s

interactive rulemaking website at http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/rule.html.

The NRC also announced in August the availability of a draft guidance document,

“Consolidated Guidance about Materials Licenses: Program-Specific Guidance about the

Medical Use of Byproduct Material,” NUREG-1556, Volume 9, and requested comments by

November 12. The comment period on this draft guidance has also been reopened until

December 16.

Comments on the guidance document should be submitted to the Chief, Rules and

Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001. Comments may also be submitted

through the Internet by addressing electronic mail to DLM1@NRC.GOV.

###
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-98-23 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Wednesday, March 25, 1998)

NRC STAFF PROPOSES TO FINE FPL $88,000

FOR VIOLATIONS AT THE ST. LUCIE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $88,000 civil penalty against

Florida Power & Light Company for two violations of NRC requirements relating to

calibration errors on St. Lucie nuclear plant’s Unit 1 refueling water tank level

instruments which could have resulted in damage to Emergency Core Cooling System

pumps during certain postulated accident conditions.

Company personnel identified the problem and reported it to the NRC. Calculations

which indicated a water level setpoint change to initiate automatic transfer of suction

from the tank to the containment sump during certain postulated loss of coolant

accidents were not properly incorporated into a procedure. This could have resulted in

a condition which could delay a switch in suction and cause possible damage to ECCS

pumps.

The first violation was that FPL failed to translate the new setpoint for the tank level into

the proper procedures. The second violation is the lack of reasonable assurance that

the ECCS systems could perform their safety functions in all accident scenarios

because of the setpoint error. The NRC staff has proposed an $88,000 civil penalty for

the two violations together. The violations have been categorized in the aggregate as a

Severity Level II problem on the NRC Enforcement Policy scale where Level I is the

most severe and Level IV the least.

In a letter to FPL, Region II Administrator Luis Reyes said that while the incorrect

setpoint did not have actual safety consequences, “this issue has significant potential

safety consequences.” Reyes said the issue was “identified because of a critical,

questioning attitude by operations and engineering personnel” at the plant. In addition,

Reyes’ letter points out that the plant staff’s corrective actions were “comprehensive”

including checking other setpoints, revising engineering instructions and a re-emphasis

of management expectations on design transmittal requirements.

Normally, a civil penalty would not have been proposed in light of FPL’s identification

and corrective action. However, a civil penalty was proposed to emphasize the

importance of effective engineering activities and associated quality assurance

commensurate with the core damage risk. Reyes said “the violations resulted in a

significant increase in risk,” and “if not for the questioning attitudes displayed by your

staff,” a larger civil penalty would have been proposed.
The company has 30 days from receipt of the Notice of Violation to either pay the fine

or protest its imposition.

#
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SIGHT
RESOURCE CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-25-2000
<CASH>                                           554
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,782
<INVENTORY>                                    7,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              11,895
<PP&E>                                        12,229
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                40,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         10,848
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                    6,535
<COMMON>                                          93
<OTHER-SE>                                    16,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  40,843
<SALES>                                       17,519
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              17,519
<CGS>                                          5,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (262)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (287)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.03)

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Earl M. TREADWAY, Appellant.

No. 01-3027.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2002.

Decided May 20, 2002.

Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

*291PER CURIAM.

Earl M. Treadway pleaded guilty to bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). The district court1 sentenced him to 72 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. The court made the new prison term consecutive to Tread-way’s undischarged 36-month term for a prior bank robbery and concurrent with his undischarged 60-month term for possessing a firearm during the prior bank robbery. On appeal, Treadway’s counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and Treadway has filed a pro se supplemental brief and moved for appointment of substitute counsel. For the reasons discussed below, we reject seriatim the arguments raised by Treadway and his counsel.

First, because the district court recognized its authority to depart on the ground Treadway raised—extraordinary physical impairment—its discretionary decision not to depart is unreviewable on appeal. *See United States v. Lim,*235 F.3d 382, 385 (8th Cir.2000). Second, the court did not abuse its discretion in deciding whether to make the new sentence consecutive or concurrent. *See United States v. Mayotte,*249 F.3d 797, 799 (8th Cir.2001) (per curiam). Third, the court did not plainly err in applying a weapon enhancement because it was entitled to rely on the unobjected-to facts in the presentence report showing that Treadway possessed and displayed a firearm during the bank robbery. *See*Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(b)(6)(D); *United States v. Rodamaker,*56 F.3d 898, 902 (8th Cir.1995). Fourth, Treadway’s challenge to his criminal history score fails because he misunderstands the definition of a “pri- or sentence.” *See*U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2, comment. (n.l).

Fifth, Treadway was not entitled to sentence credit for the time he spent in home confinement between his indictment and his conviction. *See Starchild v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons,*973 F.2d 610, 611 (8th Cir.1992). Sixth, there is no indication in the record that the government breached the plea agreement. Seventh, Treadway’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel should be presented, if at all, in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. *See United States v. Clayton,*210 F.3d 841, 845 n. 4 (8th Cir.2000). Finally, we deny Treadway’s motion for appointment of new counsel.

After reviewing the record independently pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
#### § 122.53 Aircraft of foreign registry chartered or leased to U.S. air carriers.

Aircraft of foreign registry leased or chartered to a U.S. air carrier, while being operated by the U.S. air carrier under the provisions of the Federal Aviation Administration regulations (14 CFR 121.153), shall be treated as U.S. registered aircraft for purposes of this subpart.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-09 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, January 13, 1999)

CHAIRMAN JACKSON DIRECTS STAFF REVIEW, APPROPRIATE CORRECTIVE

ACTIONS BASED ON INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT CONCERNING MILLSTONE

NRC Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson has referred to the agency

staff a report from the NRC inspector general which raises

questions about the handling of employee harassment and

intimidation complaints at the Millstone Nuclear Station near

Waterford, Conn.

The Chairman has asked the staff to provide lessons learned,

recommendations for improvement and corrective action plan no

later than January 22.

A copy of the Chairman’s memorandum directing these actions

has been posted on the NRC Internet web page at

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports/msigsaj.htm.

###