alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report**
 
2004-2005 | 2006
 
SuDoc:A 98.2:AN 7
Item Number:0074-A-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000627292
 
November 1, 2017
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/ Michael J. RossMichael J. RossPresident and Chief Executive Officer,
Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
Exhibit “2”

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1630-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/03/2023 Page 1 of 2
Date User Description Matter number Matter description Hours Rate ($) Billable ($)

6/26/2023 Timothy Kolaya

Finalize and file motion to quash subpoena and for protective order in connection with subpoena served by Cliff Haines. 2020-00554 CBSG / Par Funding Receivership 0.8 $395.00 $316.00

6/26/2023 Ryan Stumphauzer

Review of motion to quash deposition notice to Alfano, review Rosenblum email with proposed edits to same, review Kolaya redline copy, draft email to Alfano and Rosenblum with feedback re: same. 2020-00554 CBSG / Par Funding Receivership 0.4 $395.00 $158.00

6/27/2023 Timothy Kolaya

Review of response to expedited motion to quash subpoena and order granting motion, and follow up emails with co-counsel re same. 2020-00554 CBSG / Par Funding Receivership 0.3 $395.00 $118.50

TOTALS 1.5 $592.50

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1630-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/03/2023 Page 2 of 2
(No. 36892.

#### The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, *vs.*Charles Thomas, Plaintiff in Error.

*Opinion filed March*22, *1963.*

Charles Thomas, *pro se.*

William G. Clark, Attorney General, of Springfield, and Daniel P. Ward, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Fred G. Leach and E. Michael O’Brien, Assistant Attorneys General, and Edward J. Hladis and Thomas A. Hett, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.

Mr. Justice Klingbiel

delivered the opinion of the court:

The defendant pleaded guilty in the criminal court of Cook County to four indictments, two charging him with rape and two charging him with burglary. His pleas of guilty were accepted, judgments were entered, and the defendant has sued out a writ of error to review these judgments.

The defendant contends that his appointed counsel was incompetent. This case is before us on the common-law record and there is nothing in that record to support the defendant’s claim.

It is also urged that the court did not properly admonish the defendant as to the consequences of his plea. We have *332reviewed the admonishment of the court as it is set forth in the record and find it proper and sufficient. The defendant also claims that he was not advised of his right to trial by jury. This contention is answered by our opinion in *People*v. *Outten,*22 Ill.2d 146, where we held that where a defendant pleads guilty, the court is not required to refer explicitly to a right to trial by jury.

The defendant also contends in general terms that he has been deprived of equal protection of the laws and due process of law. These allegations are completely unsupported by the record.

The judgment of the criminal court of Cook County is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
§ 12.7 Permits required for importation. ( a ) Under the Act of February 15, 1927 (44 Stat. 1101, as amended, 21 U.S.C. 141-149), commonly known as the Federal Import Milk Act, the importation into the United States of milk and cream is prohibited unless the person by whom such milk or cream is shipped or transported into the United States holds a valid permit, or its electronic equivalent, from the Department of Health and Human Services. Such permits become invalid at the end of one year unless applications for renewal are filed prior to the date of expiration.
( b ) The regulations of the Department of Health and Human Services under the said act require that each container of milk or cream shipped or transported into the United States by a permittee shall have firmly attached thereto a tag showing in clear and legible type the product (raw milk, pasteurized milk, raw cream, or pasteurized cream) the permit number and the name and address of the shipper; except that in case of unit shipments consisting of milk only or cream only under one permit number, each container need not be so marked if the vehicle of transportation is sealed and tagged with the above-mentioned tag. In such case the tag is required to show, in addition to the other required information, the number of containers and the contents of each. Customs officers shall not permit the importation of any milk or cream that is not tagged in accordance with such regulations.
[28 FR 14710, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 82-145, 47 FR 35475, Aug. 16, 1982; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51253, Dec. 21, 1988; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61285, Oct. 13, 2015]
#### Albert A. Bunce v. Charles F. Humphrey.

Motion granted; questions certified. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.A

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2002 of El Paso Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert G. Phillips, Chief Executive Officer of El Paso Energy Partners
Company, general partner of El Paso Energy Partners, L.P., certify (i) that the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                     /s/ Robert G. Phillips
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Robert G. Phillips
                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                     El Paso Energy Partners Company, general
                                     partner of El Paso Energy Partners, L.P.

                                     August 13, 2002
### §183a. Oral history of the House of Representatives

#### (a) In general

The Librarian of Congress shall accept for deposit, preserve, maintain, and make accessible an oral history of the House of Representatives, as told by its Members and former Members, compiled and updated (on a voluntary or contract basis) by the United States Association of Former Members of Congress or other private organization. In carrying out this section, the Librarian of Congress may enlist the voluntary aid or assistance of such organization, or may contract with it for such services as may be necessary.

#### (b) Definition of oral history

In this section, the term "oral history" means a story or history consisting of personal recollection as recorded by any one or more of the following means:

(1) Interviews.

(2) Transcripts.

(3) Audio recordings.

(4) Video recordings.

(5) Such other form or means as may be suitable for the recording and preservation of such information.

(Pub. L. 106–99, §3, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1331.)
### §624. Study by Secretary of Labor; reports to President and Congress; scope of study; implementation of study; transmittal date of reports

(a)(1) The Secretary of Labor is directed to undertake an appropriate study of institutional and other arrangements giving rise to involuntary retirement, and report his findings and any appropriate legislative recommendations to the President and to the Congress. Such study shall include—

(A) an examination of the effect of the amendment made by section 3(a) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1978 in raising the upper age limitation established by section 631(a) of this title to 70 years of age;

(B) a determination of the feasibility of eliminating such limitation;

(C) a determination of the feasibility of raising such limitation above 70 years of age; and

(D) an examination of the effect of the exemption contained in section 631(c) of this title, relating to certain executive employees, and the exemption contained in section 631(d) of this title, relating to tenured teaching personnel.

(2) The Secretary may undertake the study required by paragraph (1) of this subsection directly or by contract or other arrangement.

(b) The report required by subsection (a) of this section shall be transmitted to the President and to the Congress as an interim report not later than January 1, 1981, and in final form not later than January 1, 1982.

(Pub. L. 90–202, §5, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 604; Pub. L. 95–256, §6, Apr. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 192.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 3(a) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1978, referred to in subsec. (a)(1)(A), is section 3(a) of Pub. L. 95–256, Apr. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 189, which amended section 631 of this title.

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–256 designated existing provisions as par. (1), added cls. (A) to (D), added par. (2), and added subsec. (b).

#### Study To Analyze Potential Consequences of Elimination of Mandatory Retirement on Institutions of Higher Education

Pub. L. 99–592, §6(c), Oct. 31, 1986, 100 Stat. 3344, required the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, not later than 12 months after Oct. 31, 1986, to enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences for the conduct of a study to analyze the potential consequences of the elimination of mandatory retirement on institutions of higher education and to report the results of the study, with recommendations, to the President and to Congress not later than 5 years after Oct. 31, 1986.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001045536
<NAME> NOVACARE EMPLOYEE SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,543
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,051)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,132
<PP&E>                                           8,577
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,354)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,304
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           291
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,504
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,614
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,544,622
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,523,277<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,472<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   733
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 481
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,659
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,663
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,996
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,996
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
<FN>
<F1>"TOTAL COSTS" CONSISTS OF COST OF SERVICES, SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES, AND PROVISION FOR RESTRUCTURE.
<F2>"OTHER EXPENSES" CONSISTS OF AMORTIZATION OF EXCESS COST OF NET ASSETS ACQUIRED
OFFSET BY INTEREST INCOME.
</FN>


</TABLE>
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-216 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, December 7, 1998)

COMMERCIAL NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS HAVE LOWEST NUMBER

OF SEVERE ACCIDENT PRECURSORS SINCE 1970

The number of operational events at commercial nuclear power plants in 1997 that

could have led to a severe accident causing damage to the reactor core was the lowest since

1970, a new analysis by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission shows. No serious accidents

occurred.

Only five events - about half as many as in each of the previous two years - had

conditions that could have remotely set the stage for a severe accident. These included the

unavailability of equipment, loss of offsite power and a piping leak. All of the accident

“precursors” in 1997 occurred at pressurized water reactors, which comprise about two-thirds of

the 104 commercial nuclear reactors operating in the United States.

The report, prepared by the NRC’s Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational

Data, with the assistance of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, also notes that

1997 was the first time since 1970 that there were no precursor events which had a probability

of producing a severe core damage accident where the odds were greater than one in 10,000.

The odds of the five precursors recorded in 1997 were between one in 10,000 and one in a

million.

The declining trend in the number of accident precursors is consistent with other

previously observed trends suggesting the safety of the nuclear power industry is improving

along with its performance.

The text of the report, NUREG/CR-4674, “Precursors to Potential Severe Core Damage

Accidents: 1997 A Status Report,” is available on the NRC Internet homepage at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports.

##
```

[109th Congress Public Law 10]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ010.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 228]]

Public Law 109-10
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 I Street in 
    Sacramento, California, as the ``Robert T. Matsui United States 
          Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Apr. 29, 2005 -  [H.R. 787]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 501 I Street in Sacramento, 
California, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert T. Matsui 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert T. Matsui 
United States Courthouse''.

    Approved April 29, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 787 (S. 125):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Apr. 13, considered and passed House.
            Apr. 14, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0142 - Status of the General License Program

Accession Number: ML011310289

Date Released: Tuesday, July 11, 2000

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML003731254 - SRM-M000710A-Affirmation Session: I. SECY-00-0093; II. SECY-00-0106; III. SECY-00-0112 (6 page(s), 7/11/2000)
    - ML021640617 - SECY-02-0142 - Status of the General License Program (5 page(s), 7/24/2002)
    - ML021580337 - SECY-02-0142-Attachment 2- STATUS OF THE GENERAL LICENSE PROGRAM (8 page(s), 7/24/2002)
    - ML021640529 - SECY-02-0142-Attachment 3 - Summary of General License Tracking System (GLTS) Costs (1 page(s), 7/24/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### PIERCE PACIFIC STAGES, INC., dba Pacific Trails, Inc., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF KELSO, a Washington municipal corporation; Steve Scibelli, individually and as Chief of Police for the City of Kelso; Douglas Robinson, individually and as City Manager for the City of Kelso; C. Leroy Borders, individually and as Attorney for the City of Kelso; Pacific Property SVC, a Washington corporation; Robert Lund, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 00-35968.

D.C. No. CV-99-05289-RJB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 7, 2002.

Decided May 13, 2002.

Before RYMER, McKEOWN and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the City of Kelso. The effect, if any, on “price, route, or service,” under 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c), and on scheduling, rate change, or authority to provide charter bus transportation under 49 U.S.C. § 14501(a), is de minimis with respect to Pierce’s transportation of property and passengers, and so the ordinance is not preempted by federal statute. *Cf. Tocher v. City of Santa Ana,*219 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir.2000). Although Pierce mentions the Commerce Clause in its brief, it makes no argument with respect to it, and we deem any appeal with respect to the Commerce Clause abandoned. We reject Pierce’s overbreadth, vagueness, selective prosecution, and due process challenges for the reasons stated by the district court. Finally, to the extent not otherwise addressed, Pierce’s First Amendment claim fails because Kelso’s ordinance is merely a time, place, and manner regulation on its face.

We affirm the amount of damages for unpaid use of Kelso Station.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.926 Verification and justification of claim for preferential tariff treatment. ( a ) *Verification.* A claim for preferential tariff treatment made under § 10.903(b) or § 10.911 of this subpart, including any statements or other information submitted to CBP in support of the claim, will be subject to such verification as the Center director deems necessary. In the event that the Center director is provided with insufficient information to verify or substantiate the claim, or the exporter or producer fails to consent to a verification visit, the Center director may deny the claim for preferential treatment. A verification of a claim for preferential tariff treatment under PTPA for goods imported into the United States may be conducted by means of one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Written requests for information from the importer, exporter, or producer;
( 2 ) Written questionnaires to the importer, exporter, or producer;
( 3 ) Visits to the premises of the exporter or producer in the territory of Peru, to review the records of the type referred to in § 10.909(c)(1) of this subpart or to observe the facilities used in the production of the good, in accordance with the framework that the Parties develop for conducting verifications; and
( 4 ) Such other procedures to which the Parties may agree.
( b ) *Applicable accounting principles.* When conducting a verification of origin to which Generally Accepted Accounting Principles may be relevant, CBP will apply and accept the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles applicable in the country of production.
§ 112.27 Marking of vehicles and vessels. ( a ) *Marking required.* Every vehicle licensed by Customs for cartage and every barge, scow, or other lighter licensed by Customs for lighterage shall be marked with the legend “Customhouse License No. ________”, and the name of the person or firm to whom the license has been issued. The abbreviated legend “C.H.L. No. ________” may be used.
( b ) *Size of marking.* The marking required by this section shall appear in letters and figures not less than 3 inches high.
( c ) *Place of marking* — ( 1 ) *Carts, trucks, drays, and other vehicles.* Every cart, truck, dray, or other vehicle used for Customs cartage by a licensed cartman shall be marked with the required legend and name on each side by painting directly onto the vehicle, or by the permanent attachment of signs bearing the required marking. However, if such marking is found by the port director to be impractical, he may designate some other conspicuous place upon the vehicle where the marking shall appear.
( 2 ) *Barges, scows, lighters, and other vessels.* Every barge, scow, lighter, or other vessel used for Customs lighterage by a licensed lighterman shall be conspicuously marked with the required legend and name.
( d ) *Removal of marking upon termination of license.* The markings required by this section shall be removed upon termination of the license.
[T.D. 73-140, 38 FR 13551, May 23, 1973, as amended by T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984]