alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 208.24 Purchase and maintenance of items not listed on Equipment Cache List. ( a ) Requests for purchase or maintenance of equipment and supplies not appearing on the Equipment Cache List, or that exceed the number specified in the Equipment Cache List, must be made in writing to the Program Manager. No Federal funds provided under any Preparedness Cooperative Agreement may be expended to purchase or maintain any equipment or supply item unless: ( 1 ) The equipment and supplies directly support the Sponsoring Agency's US&R capability;
( 2 ) The Program Manager approves the expenditure and gives written notice of his or her approval to the Sponsoring Agency before the Sponsoring Agency purchases the equipment or supply item.
( b ) Maintenance of items approved for purchase under this section is eligible for reimbursement, except as provided in § 208.26 of this subpart.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: l:20-cv-23238-DPG

ROBERT WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,

Defendant.

I

MEDIATOR'S REPORT

Daniel T. Feld, Esq., the undersigned Certified Mediator, reports to this

Honorable Court as follows:

The Mediation was held virtually on April 19,2021 @ 10:00 A.M.

AN AGREEMENT WAS REACHED.

The Agreement is attached with consent of the parties.

z NO AGREEMENT WAS REACHED; IMPASSE.

The parties wish to continue settlement negotiations and may reconvene

for a continuation of the Mediation. Notice of the continuation shall be

provided to the parties and filed with the Court. If no Notice of an

agreement is filed with the Court on or before / / then this

matter shall be deemed at an impasse.

Other:

Daniel T. Feld, Esq., Flqrlda Bar No.: 0037013

MF#: DF-10041

Case 1:20-cv-23238-DPG Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/19/2021 Page 1 of 1
166 4 Cap e St. Williamsburg , MA 01096

41 3 628-453 3 Jun e 28,200 4 Departmen

t o f Environmenta

l Protectio n Burea u o f Wast e Preventio

n On e Winte r Stree t 8 t hFloo r Boston , M A 0210

8 Attn : Rober

t Donaldso n Concernin g th e propose d amendment

s t o 31 0 CM R7 an d 31 0 CM R70 , a s i t affects th e operatio n o f stationar y engines . A n exemptio

n fo r certification i s automaticall y mad e fo r certai n engine s tha t bur n bioga s o r landfil l gas . A n exceptio

n need s t o b e mad e fo r wast e vegetabl e oi l o r biodiese l base d engines . Ther e ar e severa l studie s tha t demonstrat

e low emission

s fro mstandar

d engine s wit h thes e biomass base

d fuels . Th

e emission s fro mwast

e vegetabl e oi l base d fuel s ar e lowe r tha n fro m landfil l ga s base d fuels , othe

r factor s bein g th e same . Makin g al l liqui dfueled engine

s bur n ultr alow sulfu

r diese l appear s t o preclud e biodiese l o r wast e vegetabl e oi l base d fuels . Th e Pionee r Valle y Biodiese l Cooperativ

e ha s bee n evaluatin

g biodiese l base d baselin e generation. Thi s is i n anticipatio

n o f acommercializatio

n o f thi s syste mafte r ou r biorefiner y i s underway . I t woul d b e ver y shortsighte

d an d counterproductiv

e i f thes e regulation

s foreclose

d thes e option s jus t a s the y wer e bein g developed

. Ther e i s n o environmenta

l benefit s o f requirin g diese l fue l t o b e use d i n plac e o f biodiese l o r wast e vegetabl e oi l base d fuel . To mLeu e 80 0 285-453 3 Sincerely,

Thoma s S . Leue , Presiden t
###### Editorial Note on Part 141

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 141.17 Entry by nonresident consignee.

A nonresident consignee has the right to make entry, but any bond taken in connection with the entry shall have a resident corporate surety or, when a carnet issued under part 114 of this chapter is used as an entry form, an approved resident guaranteeing association.
EXHIBIT 3.1(a)

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                               CLAIMSNET.COM INC.



        (Original Certificate of Incorporation filed September 11, 1997)


      CLAIMSNET.COM INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), does
hereby certify as follows:

            FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation, by unanimous
      written consent without a meeting pursuant to Section 141(f) of the
      General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL"), adopted
      resolutions setting forth the amendments to the Certificate of
      Incorporation of the Corporation set forth below, declaring said
      amendments to be advisable and submitting them to the stockholders of the
      Corporation entitled to vote thereon for consideration thereof.

            SECOND: That, by written consent executed in accordance with Section
      228 of the DGCL, the holders of a majority of the outstanding stock of the
      Corporation entitled to vote thereon, and a majority of the outstanding
      stock of each class entitled to vote thereon as a class, voted in favor of
      the adoption of the amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation of the
      Corporation set forth below.

            THIRD: That the amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation of
      the Corporation set forth below were duly adopted in accordance with the
      provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

                  RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of the
            Corporation be amended by adding thereto an Article thereof numbered
            "ELEVENTH" to be and read in its entirety as follows:

                  "ELEVENTH. The Corporation hereby elects not to be governed by
            Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
            in accordance with paragraph (b)(3) of such Section 203."



<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this certificate to be
executed on its behalf this 1st day of April, 1999.


                                CLAIMSNET.COM INC.



                                BY: /S/ Bo W. Lycke
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   NAME:  BO W. LYCKE
                                   TITLE: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
                                          PRESIDENT, AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

ATTEST:

/S/ C. Kelly Campbell
------------------------
NAME:  C. KELLY CAMPBELL
TITLE: SECRETARY
Exhibit 2

(Total Compensation and Expenses Requested)

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 948-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/15/2021 Page 1 of 2
Professional Firm Category Hours Fees Expenses Total Billed

Stumphauzer Foslid Sloman Ross & 

Kolaya, PLLC Attorneys 966.1 $328,625.00 $5,496.91 $334,121.91

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & 

Raspanti, LLP Attorneys 1,428.4 $525,211.75 $97,891.50 $623,103.25

Development Specialists, Inc. Operations Consultant 2,452.5 $1,033,941.50 $33,280.57 $1,067,222.07

Lawgical Insight, LLC eDiscovery Specialist 73.0 $22,450.00 $353.37 $22,803.37

HD Investigative Group, LLC Investigations Firm 71.5 $16,087.50 $0.00 $16,087.50

Fox Rothschild Attorneys 65.9 $23,220.50 $734.86 $23,955.36

6,557.8 $1,949,536.25 $137,757.21 $2,087,293.46

Total Compensation and Expenses Requested

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 948-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/15/2021 Page 2 of 2
#### § 111.72 Dismissal subject to new proceedings.

If the Executive Assistant Commissioner finds that the evidence produced at the hearing indicates that a proper disposition of the case cannot be made on the basis of the charges preferred, he or she may instruct the processing Center to serve appropriate charges as a basis for new proceedings to be conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth in this subpart.

[CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63320, Oct. 18, 2022]
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-98-17 March 11, 1998

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC, COMMONWEALTH OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS APPARENT

VIOLATIONS AT DRESDEN STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet March 18

with representatives of Commonwealth Edison Company for a

predecisional enforcement conference on apparent procedural

violations at the Dresden Nuclear Power Station near Morris,

Illinois.

The meeting will start at 1:00 p.m. in the Third Floor

Conference Room of the NRC Region III Office, 801 Warrenville

Road, Lisle, Illinois. It is open to public observation. NRC

officials will be available at its conclusion to answer questions

from the news media and other interested observers.

The discussion will focus on Commonwealth Edison’s apparent

failure to revise containment venting procedures promptly when

notified, both by the utility’s own staff at its LaSalle station

and by NRC inspectors, about safety concerns regarding these

procedures.

Commonwealth Edison vented the Dresden Unit 3 reactor

containment in March of last year while the plant was still

operating, thus placing the plant in a condition which had not

been reviewed for potential safety consequences if certain types

of accidents occurred. Specifically, these procedures for venting

containment bypassed the plant’s pressure suppression functions

which might be needed in a severe accident.

During plant operations the air in the reactor containment

is replaced with nitrogen, an inert gas. The venting procedure

is used to remove the nitrogen, replacing it with air to permit

personnel access. The containment is the structure surrounding

the reactor which is designed to prevent the release of

radioactive materials to the environment in the unlikely event of

an accident.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean

the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that

enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety
significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out

any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report;

and to enable the company to outline its proposed corrective

actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated

enforcement action, such as a fine, will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later date.

####
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-80 September 3, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $2,500 FINE AGAINST H.H. HOLMES TESTING

LABORATORIES, INC. FOR A RADIATION SAFETY VIOLATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a

$2,500 fine against H.H. Holmes Testing Laboratories, Inc.,

Wheeling, Illinois, for failing to provide proper notification to

the NRC when it performed work in states under NRC jurisdiction.

The company is licensed by the State of Illinois to use

nuclear gauges at temporary job sites. Portable gauges

containing small amounts of radioactive material are used by the

company to measure moisture and density of construction material.

Since Illinois is an Agreement State -- where the state

government regulates the use of radioactive materials -- the

company needs to obtain NRC authorization at least three days

before working in states under NRC jurisdiction, including,

Wisconsin and Indiana.

An NRC investigation between July of last year through April

determined that on numerous occasions between September 1992 and

December 1996, H.H. Holmes used nuclear gauges in Wisconsin and

Indiana without notifying the NRC.

"As radiation safety officer and company official, you are

expected to be knowledgeable of and abide by all rules,

regulations and license requirements which are applicable to your

operation," said NRC Regional Administrator A. Bill Beach in

notifying the company of the fine. "Based on the circumstances

of this case, NRC has concluded that the violation was the result

of, at least, careless disregard for the involved regulatory

requirement."

Following the NRC investigation, H.H. Holmes applied for and

received an NRC license to conduct work in non-Agreement states.

The company has until September 21 to pay the fine or to

protest it. If the fine is protested and subsequently imposed by

the NRC staff, the company may request a hearing.
####
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.2022 Retail packaging materials and containers.

(a) *Effect on tariff shift rule.* Packaging materials and containers in which a good is packaged for retail sale, if classified with the good for which preferential tariff treatment under the PANTPA is claimed, will be disregarded in determining whether all non-originating materials used in the production of the good undergo the applicable change in tariff classification set out in General Note 35, HTSUS.

(b) *Effect on regional value content calculation.* If the good is subject to a regional value content requirement, the value of such packaging materials and containers will be taken into account as originating or non-originating materials, as the case may be, in calculating the regional value content of the good.

# Example 1.

Panamanian Producer A of good C imports 100 non-originating blister packages to be used as retail packaging for good C. As provided in § 10.2016(a)(1), the value of the blister packages is their adjusted value, which in this case is $10. Good C has a regional value content requirement. The United States importer of good C decides to use the build-down method, RVC = ((AV − VNM)/AV) × 100 (*see* § 10.2015(b)), in determining whether good C satisfies the regional value content requirement. In applying this method, the non-originating blister packages are taken into account as non-originating. As such, their $10 adjusted value is included in the VNM, value of non-originating materials, of good C.

# Example 2.

Same facts as in Example 1, except that the blister packages are originating. In this case, the adjusted value of the originating blister packages would *not* be included as part of the VNM of good C under the build-down method. However, if the U.S. importer had used the build-up method, RVC = (VOM/AV) × 100 (*see* § 10.2015(c)), the adjusted value of the blister packaging would be included as part of the VOM, value of originating materials.
#### § 162.0 Scope.

This part contains provisions for the inspection, examination, and search of persons, vessels, aircraft, vehicles, and merchandise involved in importation, for the seizure of property, and for the forfeiture and sale of seized property. It also contains provisions for Customs enforcement of the controlled substances laws. Additional provisions concerning records maintenance and examination applicable to U.S. importers, exporters and producers under the U.S.-Chile Free Trade Agreement, the U.S.-Singapore Free Trade Agreement, the Dominican Republic-Central America-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, the U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement, the U.S.-Morocco Free Trade Agreement, the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement, the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement, the U.S.-Panama Trade Promotion Agreement, and the U.S.-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement are contained in Part 10, Subparts H, I, J, L, M, Q, R, S and T of this chapter, respectively.

[T.D. 98-56, 63 FR 32945, June 16, 1998, as amended by CBP Dec. 05-07, 70 FR 10884, Mar. 7, 2005; CBP Dec. 07-81, 72 FR 58522, Oct. 16, 2007; CBP Dec. 08-22, 73 FR 33691, June 13, 2008; CBP Dec. 11-01, 76 FR 708, Jan. 6, 2011; CBP Dec. 12-03, 77 FR 15959, Mar. 19, 2012; CBP Dec. 12-16, 77 FR 59081, Sept. 26, 2012; USCBP-2013-0040, 78 FR 63068, Oct. 23, 2013; CBP Dec. 15-03; 80 FR 7317, Feb. 10, 2015]
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Southern District of Florida

VICTOR ARIZA, COLONY 

HARDWARE CORPORATION, d/b/a 

NATIONAL TOOL SUPPLY, 

a foreign for-profit corporation,

COLONY 

HARDWARE CORPORATION, d/b/a 

NATIONAL TOOL SUPPLY, 

a foreign for-profit corporation, 

Registered Agent: CT Corporation System 

1200 S Pine Island Rd 

Plantation, Fl 33324

Pelayo Duran, Esq. 

The Law Office of Pelayo Duran, PA 

4640 NW 7th St. 

Miami, Fl 33126

1:20-cv-23236-MGC Aug 4, 2020 s/ S.Carlson

Case 1:20-cv-23236-MGC Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2020 Page 1 of 1
### §65. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–310, title II, §220(a), (c), June 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 204

Section, R.S. §§57, 59; acts Mar. 2, 1895, ch. 177, §5, 28 Stat. 807; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §13, 65 Stat. 715, required Secretary of Senate to give a bond in the sum of $20,000.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I W. Kerry Jackson, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.
|  

|Date: December
      10, 2009 | By: /s/ W.
      Kerry Jackson    
|----------------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                              | W. Kerry
      Jackson            
|                              | Executive Vice
      President and
|                              | Chief Financial
      Officer     

---
Exhibit
32.2





Ener1,
Inc.


1540
Broadway, Suite 25C


New York,
New York 10036





January
19, 2010





Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, NE


Washington,
DC 20549





Re:
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350





Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 2
of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, I, Gerard A. Herlihy, Chief Financial Officer of Ener1,
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 2 of Ener1, Inc., for
      the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and





2)
            the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment
      No. 2 of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Ener1, Inc.





/s/
      Gerard A. HerlihyGerard
      A. Herlihy
                    Chief
      Financial Officer
                    (Duly
      Authorized Principal Financial and Principal
                    Accounting
      Officer and Duly Authorized
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





This
certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to Ener1, Inc.’s
quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
filing.
Exhibit 23.1

 
|  |  

 

 

 

Ernst &   Young LLP

1000,   440 2nd Ave SW

Calgary,   AB T2P 5E9 |  

 

 

 

Tel:   +1 403 206 5000

Fax:   +1 403 290 4265

ey.com/ca |   |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

 

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the use of our reports dated February 17, 2016 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TransAlta Corporation as at December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2015, and internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 of TransAlta Corporation, included as an exhibit to or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 40-F) for 2015.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 

(1)      Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-72454 and No. 333-101470) pertaining to TransAlta Corporation’s Share Option Plan

 

(2)      Registration Statement (Form F-10 No. 333-200773) pertaining to the registration of Debt and Equity Securities of TransAlta Corporation

 

of our reports dated February 17, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TransAlta Corporation as at December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2015, and internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 of TransAlta Corporation, included as an exhibit to or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 40-F) of TransAlta Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

 

 
|                   |   | /s/Ernst & Young LLP                          |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Calgary, Alberta       |   |    Chartered Professional   Accountants |
| February 17, 2016 |   |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited

 

----