alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Dr. Adya S. Tripathi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Tripath Technology Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Tripath Technology Inc.



|       |  |                                               
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /S/    ADYA S.
TRIPATHI                       
|Name:  |  | Dr. Adya S. Tripathi                          
|Title: |  | Chairman, President and ChiefExecutive Officer



Date: December 7, 2005



I, Jeffrey L. Garon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Tripath Technology Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tripath Technology Inc.



|       |  |                                                    
|------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /S/    JEFFREY L.
GARON                            
|Name:  |  | Jeffrey L. Garon                                   
|Title: |  | Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer



Date: December 7, 2005
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.826 Violations relating to the BFTA.

All criminal, civil, or administrative penalties which may be imposed on U.S. importers for violations of the customs and related laws and regulations will also apply to U.S. importers for violations of the laws and regulations relating to the BFTA.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I W. Kerry Jackson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                         
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company.

|Date:  June 9, 2005 | By: | /s/ W. KERRY JACKSON        
|------------------- | --- | ----------------------------
|                    |     |                             
|                    |     | W. Kerry Jackson            
|                    |     | Executive Vice President and
|                    |     | Chief Financial Officer
#### § 111.38 False representation to procure employment.

A broker must not knowingly use false or misleading representations to procure employment in any customs matter. In addition, a broker must not represent to a client or prospective client that he can obtain any favors from the Department of Homeland Security or any representative of the Department of Homeland Security.
§ 65.4 Right to submit new technical data. ( a ) A community has a right to request changes to any of the information shown on an effective map that does not impact flood plain or floodway delineations or base flood elevations, such as community boundary changes, labeling, or planimetric details. Such a submission shall include appropriate supporting documentation in accordance with this part and may be submitted at any time.
( b ) All requests for changes to effective maps, other than those initiatedby FEMA, must be made in writing by the Chief Executive Officer of the community (CEO) or an official designated by the CEO. Should the CEO refuse to submit such a request on behalf of another party, FEMA will agree to review it only if written evidence is provided indicating the CEO or designee has been requested to do so.
( c ) Requests for changes to effective Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps (FBFMs) are subject to the cost recovery procedures described in 44 CFR part 72. As indicated in part 72, revisions requested to correct mapping errors or errors in the Flood Insurance Study analysis are not to be subject to the cost-recovery procedures.
[51 FR 30313, Aug. 25, 1986, as amended at 57 FR 29038, June 30, 1992; 61 FR 46331, Aug. 30, 1996; 62 FR 5736, Feb. 6, 1997] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For references to FR pages showing lists of eligible communities, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-006 February 14, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATION WITH WASHINGTON, D.C., HOSPITAL

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of a Washington, D.C.,

medical facility on Wednesday, February 21, to discuss an apparent violation of agency requirements

involving the use of NRC-licensed radioactive material for cancer treatments.

Sibley Memorial Hospital officials will take part in the predecisional enforcement conference at

10 a.m. at the NRC Region I office, 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. The meeting will be

held in the Public Meeting Room and be open to the public.

On September 28 and 29, 2000, the NRC conducted a safety inspection at Sibley Memorial,

located at 5255 Loughboro Road. The inspection was limited to a review of two misadministrations

involving a pair of patients treated for eye tumors with iodine-125 implants last September. (The

radioactive material is used to kill cancer cells.)

The NRC has determined that, due to a calculation error, two patients received doses to their

tumors higher than the planned amount of 7,000 centiGray (cGy). Specifically, the error resulted in

one patient being administered a dose of 11,470 cGy and the other patient a dose of 10,866 cGy.

A medical consultant contracted by the NRC to review each event has concluded that while there

may be an increased risk of complications because of the higher dose levels, the risk is small compared

to vision problems secondary to the treatment. The consultant also found that both patients were

checked by their referring physicians following the misadministrations and no specific adverse effects

were noted.

Based on the inspection, the NRC has identified one apparent violation: A failure to have written

procedures in place pertaining to calculations to ensure that radioactive sources ordered from vendors

for use during treatments were the correct strength.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that the NRC has

determined a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee with an
2

opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to

enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this conference. That decision will be

made by NRC officials at a later time.

#
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2466

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHN ERIC HUGHES, Claimant - Appellant, and PARCEL A-4 OF PALMER SPRINGS DISTRICT, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, VIRGINIA, CONTAINING 3.5 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, TITLED TO JOHN ERIC HUGHES, ALSO INCLUDING THE LIFE ESTATE OF MARY ELIZABETH C. HUGHES, All right, title and interest in the real property, including allstructures and improvements thereon, designated as; $1,600 IN U. S. CURRENCY, Defendants, ARETHA HUGHES; MARY ELIZABETH C. HUGHES, Claimants.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-00-107-3) Submitted: April 20, 2001 Decided: May 25, 20012 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Eric Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: John Eric Hughes appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Government in its forfeiture action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hughes , No. CA-00-107-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 122.47 Stores list. ( a ) *When required.* A stores list shall be filed for all aircraft required to enter under § 122.41.
( b ) *Form.* The aircraft stores shall be listed on the cargo manifest or on a separate list. If the stores are listed on a separate list, the list must be attached to the cargo manifest. The statement “Stores List Attached” must appear on the cargo manifest.
( c ) *Contents* — ( 1 ) *Required listing.* The stores list shall include all of the following: ( i ) Alcoholic beverages, cigars, cigarettes and narcotic drugs, whether domestic or foreign;
( ii ) Bonded merchandise arriving as stores;
( iii ) Foreign merchandise arriving as stores; and
( iv ) Equipment which must be licensed by the Secretary of State (see § 122.48(b)).
( 2 ) *Other articles.* In the case of aircraft of scheduled airlines, other domestic supplies and equipment (if not subject to license) and fuel may be dropped from the stores list if the statement “Domestic supplies and equipment and fuel for immediate flight only, except as noted” appears on the cargo manifest or on the separate stores list. The stores list shall be attached to the cargo manifest.
( d ) *Other statutes.* Section 446, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1446), which covers supplies and stores kept on board vessels, applies to aircraft arriving in the U.S. from any foreign area.
### §452. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 452 was editorially reclassified as section 30142 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-97-75 FOR

IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Friday,

October 24, 1997)

NRC OFFICIALS TO MEET WITH FPC ON OCTOBER 31

TO DISCUSS STATUS OF CRYSTAL RIVER RESTART

NRC Official Will Hold News Conference After Meeting

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with Florida Power Corporation

management at Crystal River, Florida on Friday, October 31 to review the status of company

plans for restart of the Crystal River nuclear power plant later this year.

The meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m.at the plant training center on West Venable Street,

across from the Crystal River airport. Members of the public are welcome to attend for

purposes of observation.

NRC Region II Administrator Luis A. Reyes will hold a news conference at 12:30 p.m.,

following the meeting, to answer questions related to Crystal River and to briefly discuss any

other NRC initiatives of current interest to area reporters.

The company temporarily shut down the Crystal River nuclear plant in September of 1996 to

resolve concerns related to regulatory safety and design and has been working to ready the

facility for a restart projected for late this year.

The meeting is between officials of the NRC and FPC but is open to the public for purposes

of observation. NRC officials will be available at the agency’s news conference following the

meeting to answer questions from reporters and from interested observers.

#
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-98

December 3, 1999

NRC PREHEARING CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR

MILLSTONE STATION

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing

Board has scheduled a prehearing conference on Monday, December

13, in New London, Conn., in a licensing proceeding concerning a

request by Northeast Nuclear Energy Company to amend its license

for Millstone Station Unit 3 in Waterford, Conn.

The conference, which is open to the public for observation,

will begin at 9:00 a.m. in Ballroom 3 at the Radisson Hotel, 35

Governor Winthrop Blvd., New London. It will continue on

Tuesday, December 14, at 9 a.m., to the extent necessary.

NU has requested a license amendment to increase the

capacity (through the addition of high-density storage racks) of

the spent fuel pool of Millstone 3.

A request for a hearing has been filed jointly by the

Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone and the Long Island

Coalition Against Millstone. Participants at the conference will

discuss the issue of the petitioners’ standing to intervene in

the proceeding and the admissibility of their contentions.

The Licensing Board plans to set a time later to receive

oral statements from any person who is not a party to the

proceeding or a petitioner for intervention. It does not intend

to receive such statements at this prehearing conference.

Written statements should be submitted to the Office of the

Secretary, Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555. A copy should

also be sent to the Chairman of this Atomic Safety and Licensing

Board, T3 F23, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,

D.C. 20555.

The following Administrative Judges from the NRC’s Atomic

Safety and Licensing Board Panel are members of this Licensing

Board: Charles Bechhoefer, Chairman; Dr. Richard F. Cole; and Dr.

Charles N. Kelber.

#
- Untitled
Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ImageMax, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David B. Walls, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company as of December 31, 2002 (the last date of the period
         covered by the Report).



/s/ David B. Walls
---------------------------------
David B. Walls
Chief Financial Officer
April 15, 2003
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-154 October 6, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, OCTOBER 17 -19

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) has

scheduled a meeting from October 17-19 in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss, among other issues, the

decommissioning criteria for the former West Valley reprocessing plant in New York.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s

Two White Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, beginning at 8:30 each day.

On the opening day, the committee will discuss the revised site suitability and license

application task action plan, and hear an NRC staff briefing on the results of its evaluation of

comments and a proposed final approach to the decommissioning criteria for the former West Valley

nuclear fuel reprocessing plant in New York. It also will review proposed ACNW reports.

On October 18, the committee will discuss recent tests exploring specific aspects of the

corrosion resistance of Alloy-22 material, then hear a presentation from the NRC staff on its

rulemaking plan addressing the entombment option for nuclear power reactors, as well as comments

from consultants and others on recent related activities.

The final day’s agenda will include an information briefing by the agency staff on its progress

in developing a more risk-informed and coherent set of requirements for licensing source material, a

discussion of proposed ACNW reports and miscellaneous items.

Those who wish to make oral or written statements, or seek additional information on the

meeting or changes to the agenda should contact Howard Larson, at 301-415-6805.

ACNW meeting notices, transcripts and letters are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW/ .

###
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23512]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Consumer Specialty Products Association Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 8, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Consumer Specialty Products 
Association Inc. (``CSPA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Consumer 
Specialty Products Association Inc., Washington, DC. The nature and 
scope of CSPA's standards development activities are: consumer-
specialty product safety; product description, size and rating; product 
evaluation test procedures; definitions of terms; labeling and other 
product information; and recommended levels of performance, among 
others.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23512 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### §463. Unlawful acts relating to labor organization under trusteeship

(a) During any period when a subordinate body of a labor organization is in trusteeship, it shall be unlawful (1) to count the vote of delegates from such body in any convention or election of officers of the labor organization unless the delegates have been chosen by secret ballot in an election in which all the members in good standing of such subordinate body were eligible to participate, or (2) to transfer to such organization any current receipts or other funds of the subordinate body except the normal per capita tax and assessments payable by subordinate bodies not in trusteeship: Provided, That nothing herein contained shall prevent the distribution of the assets of a labor organization in accordance with its constitution and bylaws upon the bona fide dissolution thereof.

(b) Any person who willfully violates this section shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

(Pub. L. 86–257, title III, §303, Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 531.)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 24, 2009 

d0217 

Order 

 

February 24, 2009 

137804 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137804 

 COA: 287617 

Wayne CC: 07-012277-01-FC 

KENT DOUGLAS WELLS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 8, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 HATHAWAY, J., not participating. Justice Hathaway recuses herself and will not 

participate in this case as she was the presiding trial court judge. See MCR 2.003(B).