alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-67 July 16, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH OSU OFFICIALS ON APPARENT VIOLATIONS

OF REQUIREMENTS FOR HANDLING AND STORING RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet Thursday

(July 17) with representatives of Ohio State University for a

predecisional enforcement conference on apparent violations of

NRC requirements for the handling and storage of radioactive

materials.

The university, located in Columbus, Ohio, is licensed by

the NRC to possess and use radioactive material for academic,

medical, and research purposes.

The meeting, which is open to public observation, will be at

1 p.m. in the Third Floor Conference Room, NRC Region III Office,

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois.

The apparent violations were identified in three NRC

inspections and an investigation by its Office of Investigations.

They were conducted between June 1996 and April of this year.

These apparent violations involve exceeding time limits for

storage of radioactive waste, failing to make periodic

inventories of radiation sources, failing to report lost or

missing radioactive material or not reporting the loss promptly,

and failing to properly secure packages containing radioactive

material and laboratories where the material was used.

Some of the violations were similar to violations found in

earlier NRC inspections.

The NRC issued a Confirmatory Action Letter to the

university in August 1996, documenting its plans to correct the

violations.

A subsequent NRC inspection in December found that adequate

corrective actions were being taken for most of the problems. In

April NRC inspectors observed considerable improvement in the

storage and disposal of radioactive waste.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean
the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that

enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety

significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out

any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report;

and to enable the company to outline its proposed corrective

actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated

enforcement action, such as a fine, will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later date.

#####
### §1847. Authorization to fix basic rate of compensation for certain positions

On and after August 21, 1959, the Architect of the Capitol is authorized, without regard to chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, to fix the compensation of four positions under the appropriation "Salaries, Office of the Architect of the Capitol", of two positions under the appropriation "Capitol Buildings", and of one position under the appropriation "House Office Buildings" at a basic rate of $8,200 per annum each: Provided, That this provision shall not be applicable to the positions of Architect or Assistant Architect.

On and after August 21, 1959, the Architect of the Capitol is authorized, without regard to chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, to fix the compensation of one position under the appropriation "Senate Office Buildings", at a basic rate of $8,200 per annum.

(Pub. L. 86–176, Aug. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 407; Pub. L. 89–309, ch. VII, Oct. 31, 1965, 79 Stat. 1147; Pub. L. 90–206, title II, §214(p), Dec. 16, 1967, 81 Stat. 638; Pub. L. 90–239, ch. IV, Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 775; Pub. L. 94–157, title I, ch. IV, Dec. 18, 1975, 89 Stat. 835; Pub. L. 101–163, title I, §106(c), Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1056.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 166b–3 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

"Chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5" substituted for "the Classification Act of 1949, as amended" in text on authority of Pub. L. 89–554, §7(b), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 631, the first section of which enacted Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Amendments

1989—Pub. L. 101–163 substituted "four positions" for "three positions" and "Architect or Assistant Architect" for "Architect, Assistant Architect, or Second Assistant Architect of the Capitol".

1975—Pub. L. 94–157 increased to two positions from one position the number of positions under the appropriation "Capitol Buildings".

1968—Pub. L. 90–239 increased the compensation of one position under appropriation "Senate Office Buildings" from "$7,700" to "$8,200".

1967—Pub. L. 90–206 increased the compensation from $7,700 to $8,200 per annum each of the three positions under the appropriation "Salaries, Office of the Architect of the Capitol", of one position under the appropriation "Capitol Buildings", and of one position under the appropriation "House Office Buildings".

1965—Pub. L. 89–309 increased the compensation of one position under appropriation "Senate Office Buildings" from $7,020 to $7,700.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1967 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–206 effective as of beginning of first pay period which begins on or after Oct. 1, 1967, see section 220(a)(2) of Pub. L. 90–206, set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §§1771 to 1775. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–220, title I, §199(b)(2), Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1059

Section 1771, Pub. L. 97–300, title IV, §471, Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1387, stated purpose to establish National Commission for Employment Policy.

Section 1772, Pub. L. 97–300, title IV, §472, Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1387; Pub. L. 98–524, §4(a)(7), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2488; Pub. L. 102–367, title VII, §702(a)(17), Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1112, established National Commission for Employment Policy.

Section 1773, Pub. L. 97–300, title IV, §473, Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1388; Pub. L. 98–524, §4(a)(8), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2488; Pub. L. 102–367, title VII, §702(a)(18), Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1112, related to functions of Commission.

Section 1774, Pub. L. 97–300, title IV, §474, Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1389, contained administrative provisions.

Section 1775, Pub. L. 97–300, title IV, §475, Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1389, related to annual reports by Commission.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 2000, see section 199(c)(2)(B) of Pub. L. 105–220, set out as a note under section 1501 of this title.
### §1745. Copies of foreign patent documents

Copies of the specifications and drawings of foreign letters patent, or applications for foreign letters patent, and copies of excerpts of the official journals and other official publications of foreign patent offices belonging to the United States Patent and Trademark Office, certified in the manner provided by section 1744 of this title are prima facie evidence of their contents and of the dates indicated on their face.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 948, §1746; renumbered §1745, May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §92(e), 63 Stat. 103; Pub. L. 88–619, §7(a), Oct. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 996; amended Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(b)(16)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–585.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §674 (R.S. §893).

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1745, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 948, related to printed copies of patent specifications and drawings, prior to repeal by act May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §92(d), 63 Stat. 103.

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–113 substituted "United States Patent and Trademark Office" for "United States Patent Office".

1964—Pub. L. 88–619, among other changes, inserted "or applications for foreign letters patent, and copies of excerpts of the official journals and other official publications of foreign patent offices belonging to the United States Patent Office" in text, and substituted "documents" for "specifications and drawings" in section catchline.

1949—Act May 24, 1949, renumbered section 1746 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of Title 35, Patents.
### §104b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 104b was editorially reclassified as section 5535 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Reporting Payments Made to Witnesses Before Committee on Standards of Official Conduct

Pub. L. 105–275, title I, §105, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2439, which related to reporting payments made to witnesses before Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, was editorially reclassified as section 4713 of this title.
§ 7.13 Custody of archaeological resources. ( a ) Archaeological resources excavated or removed from the public lands remain the property of the United States.
( b ) Archaeological resources excavated or removed from Indian lands remain the property of the Indian or Indian tribe having rights of ownership over such resources.
( c ) The Secretary of the Interior may promulgate regulations providing for the exchange of archaeological resources among suitable universities, museums, or other scientific or educational institutions, for the ultimate disposition of archaeological resources, and for standards by which archaeological resources shall be preserved and maintained, when such resources have been excavated or removed from public lands and Indian lands.
( d ) In the absence of regulations referenced in paragraph (c) of this section, the Federal land manager may provide for the exchange of archaeological resources among suitable universities, museums, or other scientific or educational institutions, when such resources have been excavated or removed from public lands under the authority of a permit issued by the Federal land manager.
( e ) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, the Federal land manager will follow the procedures required by NAGPRA and its implementing regulations for determining the disposition of Native American human remains and other “cultural items”, as defined by NAGPRA, that have been excavated, removed, or discovered on public lands.
[49 FR 1027, Jan. 6, 1984, as amended at 60 FR 5260, 5261, Jan. 26, 1995]
§ 140.2 What is a debt and how can the SBA collect it through offset? ( a ) A debt means an amount owed to the United States from loans made or guaranteed by the United States, and from fees, leases, rents, royalties, services, sales of real or personal property, overpayments, fines, penalties, damages, interest, forfeitures, or any other source. You are a debtor if you owe an amount to the United States from any of these sources.
( b ) SBA may collect past-due debts through offset by using any of three procedures: administrative offset, salary offset, or IRS tax refund offset. A past-due debt is one which has been reduced to judgment, has been accelerated, or has been due for at least 90 days. ( 1 ) *Administrative offset.* SBA may withhold money it owes to the debtor in order to satisfy the debt. This procedure is an “administrative offset” and is authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3716.
( 2 ) *Salary offset.* If the debtor is a federal employee (a civilian employee as defined by 5 U.S.C. 2105, an employee of the U.S. Postal Service or Postal Rate Commission, or a member of the Uniformed Services or Reserve of the Uniformed Services), SBA may deduct payments owed to SBA or another federal agency from the debtor's paycheck. This procedure is a “salary offset” and is authorized by 5 U.S.C. 5514. ( i ) Any amount deducted from salary in any one pay period will not exceed 15 percent of a debtor's disposable pay, unless the debtor agrees in writing to a greater percentage.
( ii ) SBA also may collect against travel advances, training expenses, disallowed payments, retirement benefits, or any other amount due the employee, including lump-sum payments.
( iii ) If an employee has terminated employment after salary offset has been initiated, there are no limitations on the amount that can be withheld or offset.
( 3 ) *IRS tax refund offset.* SBA may request that IRS reduce a debtor's tax refund by the amount of the debt, as authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3720A. Where available, administrative and salary offsets must be used before collection is attempted through income tax offset. SBA may refer a debt to the IRS for a tax refund offset and take additional action against the debtor to collect the debt at the same time or in sequence. When SBA makes simultaneous or sequential referrals (within six months of the initial notice), only one review pursuant to the rules in this part and the statutes authorizing them is required.
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.401 Scope.

This subpart implements the duty preference and related customs provisions applicable to imported goods under the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement (the US-CFTA) signed on June 6, 2003, and under the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (the Act; 117 Stat. 909). Except as otherwise specified in this subpart, the procedures and other requirements set forth in this subpart are in addition to the customs procedures and requirements of general application contained elsewhere in this chapter. Additional provisions implementing certain aspects of the US-CFTA and the Act are contained in parts 12, 24, 162, and 163 of this chapter.

[CBP Dec. 05-07, 70 FR 10873, Mar. 7, 2005, as amended by CBP Dec. 06-39, 71 FR 76131, Dec. 20, 2006]
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00016

- CV
GUARDIANSHIP OF LEON R. BERNSEN SR., AN INCAPACITATED PERSON
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- GU

- 00099

- 5

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decisio n certified below for observance. September 30, 2021
### §282. Legislative Counsel

The management, supervision, and administration of the Office are vested in the Legislative Counsel, who shall be appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives without regard to political affiliation and solely on the basis of fitness to perform the duties of the position. Any person so appointed shall serve at the pleasure of the Speaker.

(Pub. L. 91–510, title V, §521, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1202.)
§ 111.96 Fees. ( a ) *License fee; examination fee; fingerprint fee.* Each applicant for a broker's license pursuant to § 111.12 must pay a fee of $300 for an individual license application and $500 for a partnership, association, or corporation license application to defray the costs to CBP in processing the application. Each individual who intends to take the examination provided for in § 111.13 must pay a $390 examination fee before taking the examination. An individual who submits an application for a license must also pay a fingerprint processing fee; the processing Center will inform the applicant of the current Federal Bureau of Investigation fee for conducting fingerprint checks, which must be paid to CBP before further processing of the application will occur.
( b ) *Permit application fee.* An application fee of $100 must be paid in connection with a national permit issued under § 111.19 to defray the processing costs, including costs associated with an application for reinstatement of a permit that was revoked by operation of law or otherwise.
( c ) *Permit user fee.* Payment of an annual permit user fee defined in § 24.22(h) of this chapter is required for a national permit granted to an individual, partnership, association, or corporate broker. The permit user fee is payable with the filing of an application for a national permit under § 111.19(b), and for each subsequent calendar year at the processing Center referred to in § 111.19(b). The permit user fee must be paid by the due date as published annually in the Federal Register, and must be remitted in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 24.22(i) of this chapter. When a broker submits an application for a national permit under § 111.19(b), the full permit user fee must be remitted with the application, regardless of the point during the calendar year at which the application is submitted. If a broker fails to pay the annual permit user fee by the published due date, the permit is revoked by operation of law. The processing Center will notify the broker in writing of the failure to pay and the revocation of the permit.
( d ) *Triennial status report fee.* A fee of $100 is required to defray the costs of administering the triennial status reporting requirement prescribed in § 111.30(d)(1).
( e ) *Method of payment.* All fees prescribed under this section must be paid by check or money order payable to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, or paid by other CBP-approved payment method.
[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 03-13, 68 FR 43630, July 24, 2003; 72 FR 3734, Jan. 26, 2007; CBP Dec. 17-05, 82 FR 29719, June 30, 2017; CBP Dec. 17-16, 82 FR 50530, Nov. 1, 2017; CBP Dec. 22-22, 87 FR 63267, Oct. 18, 2022; CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63321, Oct. 18, 2022]
§ 127.356 How does a concern obtain certification from an approved certifier? ( a ) A concern that seeks WOSB or EDWOSB certification from an SBA-approved third-party certifier must submit its application directly to the approved certifier in accordance with the specific application procedures of the particular certifier.
( b ) The concern must register in the System for Award Management (SAM), or any successor system.
( c ) The approved certifier must ensure that all documents used to determine that a concern is approved for certification are uploaded in *https://certify.sba.gov* or any successor system.
[85 FR 27662, May 11, 2020]
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.2008 Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment. ( a ) *General.* If the importer fails to comply with any requirement under this subpart, including submission of a complete certification prepared in accordance with § 10.2004 of this subpart, when requested, the Center director may deny preferential tariff treatment to the imported good.
( b ) *Failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment.* Where the requirements for preferential tariff treatment set forth elsewhere in this subpart are met, the Center director nevertheless may deny preferential tariff treatment to an originating good if the good is shipped through or transshipped in a country other than a Party to the PANTPA, and the importer of the good does not provide, at the request of the Center director, evidence demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Center director that the conditions set forth in § 10.2025(a) were met.
Promissory Note

                                                     Salt Lake City, Utah
$ 70,000.00                                          March 30, 2001

On the date listed above, for value received,  the undersigned,  Terry Deru (the
"Borrower") promises to pay to Prime Resource, LLC (the "Holder"),  or order, at
22 East 100 South,  Suite 400,  Salt Lake City,  Utah 84111,  or any other place
designated in a writing submitted by Holder to Borrower,  the principal sum of $
70,000.00 (Seventy Thousand  Dollars),  according to the terms contained in this
Note.

Interest  shall accrue at a rate of 4.86% per annum.  Any payments made shall be
applied first to accrued interest,  second to any penalties or attorney fees, if
any,  then to principal.  No payments are required  during the term of the note.
There will be no  prepayment  penalties  if payments are made at any time during
the term of the note. Borrower shall pay a final payment of $ 70,000.00 (Seventy
Thousand Dollars) together with any accrued interest on March 30, 2004.

Payments are payable in lawful money of the United States.

Should default of the payment occur, the whole sum shall become  immediately due
and payable at Holder's option.  Failure by Holder to exercise this option shall
not  constitute  a  waiver  of the  right  to  exercise  it in the  event of any
subsequent default.

Whether or not suit is filed,  Borrower agrees to pay all reasonable  attorney's
fees, costs of collection,  costs, and expenses incurred by Holder in connection
with the enforcement or collection of this Note.  Borrower further agrees to pay
all  costs of suit and the sum  adjudged  as  attorneys'  fees in any  action to
enforce  payment  of this  Note or any  part  of it.

/s/   Terry Deru
-------------------------
Name: Terry Deru
### Part B—Local Provisions
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________ NO. 09

- 1 3

- 00 460

- C R



### ____________________
CODY DEMAL ANDREWS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________ On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 11

- 12881

________________________________________________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
Cody Demal Andrews pleaded guilty under a plea agreement to the offense
of robbery. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.02 (West 2011 )

. The trial court
deferred adjudication of guilt , assessed a fine of $500, and placed Andrews on
unadjudicated community supervision for ten years. The State file d a motion to
revoke community supervision. Andrews pleaded “true” to violations of his
supervision. Finding Andrews violated the terms of his community supervision
, t he2 trial court revoked Andrew s ’s supervision, adjudicated his guilt, and sentenced him

to twenty years in prison.

Andrews ’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional

evaluation of the record and concludes there are n o arguable points of error. See

Anders v. Californ ia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1978). We granted an extension of time for Andrews to file a pro se

response. We received no response from Andrews.

We have independently reviewed the clerk’s record and repor ter’s record to
determine whether there are arguable grounds which might support an appeal. See

Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

- 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Stafford v.

State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 509

- 1 1 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We have found none.

Therefor e, it is unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to rebrief
Andrews’s appeal. See Bledsoe , 178 S.W.3d at 826

- 2 8 ; compare Stafford , 813

S.W.2d at 511.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

_________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON Justice Submitted on April 1, 2014 Opinion Delivered May 7, 2014 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.