alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §179w. Effective date

The provisions of sections 179l to 179w of this title shall apply to any copy of any film, including those copies of films selected for inclusion in the National Film Registry under the National Film Preservation Act of 1988 and the National Film Preservation Act of 1992, except that any film so selected under either Act shall be deemed to have been selected for the National Film Registry under sections 179l to 179w of this title.

(Pub. L. 104–285, title I, §113, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3382; Pub. L. 109–9, title III, §302(e), Apr. 27, 2005, 119 Stat. 226; Pub. L. 110–336, §3(a)(1)(B), Oct. 2, 2008, 122 Stat. 3727.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Film Preservation Act of 1988, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 100–446, title I, §§1–13, Sept. 27, 1988, 102 Stat. 1782–1788, which was classified to sections 178 to 178l of this title and was repealed by Pub. L. 102–307, title II, §214, June 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 272.

The National Film Preservation Act of 1992, referred to in text, is title II of Pub. L. 102–307, June 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 267, which was classified principally to sections 179 to 179k of this title and was repealed by Pub. L. 104–285, title I, §114, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3382.

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–336 struck out the first sentence which read as follows: "The provisions of sections 179l to 179w of this title shall be effective for 13 years beginning on October 11, 1996."

2005—Pub. L. 109–9 substituted "13 years" for "7 years".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 110–336 effective as if included in the enactment of the National Film Preservation Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104–285, title I, see section 3(a)(1)(C) of Pub. L. 110–336, set out as a note under section 179v of this title.

#### Effective Date Extension

Pub. L. 108–447, div. G, title I, §1205(a), Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3189, provided that title I of Pub. L. 104–285, which enacted sections 179l to 179w of this title and repealed sections 179 to 179k of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 179 of this title, was to be effective through fiscal year 2005, notwithstanding former provision of this section which provided that title I was effective for only 7 years beginning on Oct. 11, 1996.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-10 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 4


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-10 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of 4


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-10 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 3 of 4


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-10 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,021
<SECURITIES>                                     3,832
<RECEIVABLES>                                      224
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (26)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,176
<PP&E>                                           3,705
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              952
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,923
<SALES>                                            414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   414
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,665
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,755
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    65
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 787
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,858)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,858)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,858)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.52)


</TABLE>
:i 

j 

l 

1 

I 

I 

l 

l 

l 

l 

l 

i 

I 

I 

i 

I 

! 

U.S. Department Assistant Secretary 

of Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

Ms. Connie Ware 

President/CEO 

Marshall, Texas Chamber of Commerce 

208 E. Burleson 

Marshall, TX 75670 

Dear Ms. Ware: 

AUG 26 2013 .-_i 

L 

:·: 1200 New Jersey Avenue. SE 

· · __ ; Washington. DC 20590 

Thank you for your letter, addressed to Secretary Foxx, supporting the proposal submitted by the 

Shreveport Airport Authority for a grant under the U.S. Department ofTransportation's Small 

Community Air Service Development Program. Secretary Foxx has asked that I respond to you 

on his behalf. 

The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller 

communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or 

insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of 40 grant 

awards each year, although no more than four awards may be to communities in the same State. 

In order to provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service 

deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types of projects that can be funded. 

On June 24, the Department issued an order requesting that communities interested in receiving a 

grant this year file their applications by July 26. As these grant requests are pending before the 

Department, I cannot comment on the merits of any particular propo,sal. I assure you that the 

Department will give full and fair consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed. 

As is our standard practice, I am placing a copy of your letter and this response in Docket 

DOT-OST-2013-0120 as a contact outside the record of this matter. I appreciate your interest in 

this program. 

Sincerely yours, 

Susan L. Kurland 

Assistant Secretary for 

Aviation and International Affairs 
July 17, 2013 

The Honorable Anthony FolOC 

Secretary, u.s. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Secret;~r)f Foxx, 

We are wtiting in support of any and all consideration you are able to give the 

Shreveport Airport; Authority regarding expanded airline service through a 

new route to the Midwest and/or Atlantic region. 

The Shreveport Regional Airport is an esse~tial cog in transportation in our 

part of the country, and creation of a route to many of the Midwest or Atlantic 

airports would assist in the growing economy of East Texas, Shreveport and 

Northern Louisiana and Arkansas as well. 

Marshall relies heavily on the Shreveport Regional Airport for access to other 

parts of the country and to foreign areas, and the growth of routes and access 

would benefit us gteatly. 

We are in hopes that you will look favorably on the expanded routes in the 

current requests and in the future as well. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Connie Ware 

President/ CEO 

Marshall, Texas Chamber of Commerce 

208 E. Burleson Marshall, Texas 75670 903·935·7868 FAX903·935-9982 

cware@gower.net 

30
#### Elizabeth Hunt et al., Appellants, v. Hearns Department Stores, Inc., Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present— Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER I—HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Louis LeCalsey, III, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December31, 2006 of Tufco Technologies, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 14, 2007                    /s/ Louis LeCalsey, III   Louis LeCalsey, III   President and Chief Executive Officer
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules 4439 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 60 

[DOCKET NUMBER [EPA–HQ–OAR–2013– 

0495; FRL 9905–61–OAR] 

Standards of Performance for 

Greenhouse Gas Emissions for New 

Stationary Sources: Electric Utility 

Generating Units 

Correction 

In proposed rule document 2014– 

01065 appearing on pages 3357–3358 in 

the issue of Wednesday, January 22, 

2014, make the following corrections: 

1. On page 3357, in the third column, 

in the document heading, ‘‘40 CFR Part 

63’’ is corrected to read ‘‘40 CFR Part 

60’’. 

2. On page 3358, in the second 

column, in the seventh line from the 

bottom, ‘‘List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 

63’’ should read ‘‘List of Subjects in 40 

CFR Part 60’’. 

[FR Doc. C1–2014–01065 Filed 1–27–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 97- 41 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson (July 18, 1997)

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

E-MAIL: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH POWER RESOURCES, INC.

TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a predecisional enforcement

conference Tuesday, July 22, with officials of Power Resources, Inc., of Denver, Colorado, to

discuss apparent violations of NRC requirements at the Highland Uranium Project in Converse

County, Wyoming.

The conference will begin at 1 p.m. at NRC Region IV offices in Arlington, Texas. The

meeting will be open to the public for observation; NRC officials will be available afterwards for

questions.

The conferees will discuss seven apparent violations of NRC requirements stemming

from inspections completed March 13. Three of the apparent violations are related to the

company’s radiation protection program, three involve environmental monitoring and one a

failure to submit a financial report.

In the first apparent radiation protection program violation, inspectors found that

ventilation equipment for some buildings at the Highland site was not always used, potentially

allowing the accumulation of radioactive gasses from the natural uranium being processed. The

second apparent violation is a failure to adequately monitor the exposure of workers to airborne

radioactivity from the uranium processing. The third is the apparent failure to properly post one

portion of the site as an “airborne radiation area.”

-More-
Apparent violations in the environmental monitoring program are the failure to establish

written procedures for the program, failure to report the results of three water samples in the

semiannual effluent reports for 1996, and two semiannual environmental and effluent monitoring

reports that contained incomplete and inaccurate information.

Finally, Power Resources failed to submit on time an annual update to the amount of

financial assurance estimated to be required to shutdown and decommission the Highland

Uranium Project. The company is required by its NRC license to submit this update each year by

March 30. The update had not been received by July 3.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that NRC has

made a final decision that a violation did occur or that enforcement action, such as a monetary

fine, will be taken. The purpose is to discuss the apparent violation, its cause and safety

significance; to provide Power Resources an opportunity to challenge or correct portions of the

NRC inspection report; and for the company to outline its corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any enforcement action will be made at the

conference. Those decisions will be made later by senior NRC officials.

###
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 98-13 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson April 14, 1998

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

E-MAIL: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC RATES PALO VERDE NUCLEAR PLANT `SUPERIOR' IN THREE AREAS

AND `GOOD' IN ONE OTHER IN ASSESSMENT REPORT

The Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station has received performance ratings of

"superior" in engineering, maintenance and plant support, and "good" in plant

operations in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's latest Systematic Assessment of

Licensee Performance.

The SALP report was issued on April 8 to the Arizona Public Service Co., which

operates the three-reactor site at Buckeye, Ariz., about 50 miles west of Phoenix. It

evaluates the plant's performance for the period from June 2, 1996, through March 7 of

this year.

NRC and APS officials will discuss the report at a meeting at 11 a.m. Tuesday,

April 28, at the Energy Information Center at the Palo Verde site. The meeting will be

open to the public for observation; NRC officials will be available afterwards for

questions.

SALP reports rate safety performance at nuclear plants in four functional areas --

plant operations, maintenance, engineering and plant support -- and assign ratings of

Category 1, 2 or 3, reflecting superior, good or adequate performance. Palo Verde was

given the following ratings on the current SALP and previous SALP in 1996:

Functional areas & ratings Current Previous

Plant Operations 2 1

Maintenance 1 1

Engineering 1 1

Plant Support 1 2
In his cover letter to the report, NRC Regional Administrator Ellis W. Merschoff

explained why the score in plant operations declined. “The performance of the

operators during normal and transient operations continued at a high level. However,

instances were noted where the overall control of onsite activities and interdepartmental

communications were weak,” he said.

In maintenance, Merschoff noted the highly effective maintenance rule

implementation and individual craft skills. The quality of individual work products was

noted as a strength in engineering. In plant support, the NRC noted significant

improvements in radiological controls and in plant security, although a small decline in

emergency preparedness was seen.

###

EDITORS/NEWS DIRECTORS: A copy of the SALP report is available upon request

from this office.
§ 304.4 Performance evaluations. ( a ) EDA shall evaluate the management standards, financial accountability and program performance of each District Organization within three years after the initial Investment award and at least once every three years thereafter, so long as the District Organization continues to receive Investment Assistance. EDA's evaluation shall assess: ( 1 ) The continuing Regional eligibility of the District, as set forth in § 304.1;
( 2 ) The management of the District Organization, as set forth in § 304.2; and
( 3 ) The implementation of the CEDS, including the District Organization's performance and contribution towards the retention and creation of employment, as set forth in § 303.7 of this chapter.
( b ) For peer review, EDA shall ensure the participation of at least one other District Organization in the performance evaluation on a cost-reimbursement basis.
[71 FR 56675, Sept. 27, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 76131, Dec. 19, 2014]
No: II-23-033 December 5, 2023 

Contact: Dave Gasperson, 404-997-4417 

NRC Names Senior Resident Inspector at Turkey Point Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Amber Donley as 

the new senior resident inspector at the Turkey Point nuclear power plant. The 

plant, operated by Florida Power & Light Co., is located near Homestead, 

Florida. 

Donley joined the NRC in 2020 as a project engineer in the Region IV 

office in Arlington, Texas. She has served as a resident inspector at Columbia 

Generating Station in Washington and as acting resident inspector at the 

Grand Gulf, Callaway, and Catawba nuclear power plants. 

Before the NRC, Donley was a staff chemist at Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station. She 

holds a doctorate in analytical radiochemistry from Washington State University and a bachelor's 

degree in nuclear engineering from the University of Michigan. 

“Amber's distinguished academic background in nuclear engineering and analytical 

radiochemistry, along with her experience in the nuclear sector, make her exceptionally qualified 

for her new role at Turkey Point,” said NRC Region II Administrator Laura Dudes. “Her blend of 

theoretical knowledge and practical expertise in the private sector and the NRC underscores her 

commitment to maintaining the highest safety and security standards.” 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors who 

monitor day-to-day operations at the plant. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, 

conducting inspections, monitoring significant projects, and interacting with plant workers and the 

public.
§ 7.948 Alternate funds disbursal procedure. ( a ) When FEMA withholds funds from recipient under this regulation, the Administrator may, if allowable under the statute governing the assistance, disburse the withheld funds directly to an alternate recipient: Any public or nonprofit private organization or agency, or State or political subdivision of the State.
( b ) The Administrator will require any alternate recipient to demonstrate: ( 1 ) The ability to comply with this regulation; and
( 2 ) The ability to achieve the goals of the Federal statute authorizing the Federal financial assistance.
[55 FR 23078, June 6, 1990, as amended at 68 FR 51380, Aug. 26, 2003]
Exhibit
      32.2





Ener1,
      Inc.


500
      West
      Cypress Creek Road, Suite 100


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309






August
      14, 2007





Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549





Re:
      Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350





Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1,
      Inc.,
      for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission, I, Ajit Habbu, Chief Financial Officer of Ener1, Inc., hereby
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            such
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended
                June
                30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                15(d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and





2)
            the
                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
                Ener1,
                Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                Ener1, Inc.




/s/
                  Ajit HabbuAjit
                  Habbu
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
                (Duly
                  Authorized Principal Financial andAccounting
                  Officer and Duly Authorized
                  Officer)


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
      retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.





This
      certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to Ener1, Inc.’s
      quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
      to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
      reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
      except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
      filing.