alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 693 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for the halt in pension 

payments for Members of Congress sentenced for certain offenses, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2021 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 

Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for the 

halt in pension payments for Members of Congress sentenced for certain offenses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Congressionally 

5 Obligated Recurring Revenue Used as Pensions To Incar6 cerated Officials Now Act’’ or the ‘‘No CORRUPTION 

7 Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 693 IS

1 SEC. 2. FORFEITURE OF PENSION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8332(o) of title 5, United 

3 States Code, is amended— 

4 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4), (5), and 

5 (6) as paragraphs (5), (6), and (7), respectively; 

6 (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(4)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), an individual 

9 convicted of an offense described in paragraph (2) shall 

10 not be eligible to receive any payment of an annuity pursu11 ant to the retirement system under this subchapter or 

12 chapter 84, except that this sentence applies only to such 

13 payments based on service rendered as a Member (irre14 spective of when rendered). 

15 ‘‘(B) If the conviction of an individual described in 

16 subparagraph (A) is overturned on appeal by a court of 

17 competent jurisdiction, the individual shall receive pay18 ments that the individual would have received but for the 

19 application of subparagraph (A). 

20 ‘‘(C) This paragraph applies only to a conviction that 

21 occurs after the date of enactment of the No Congression22 ally Obligated Recurring Revenue Used as Pensions To 

23 Incarcerated Officials Now Act.’’; 

24 (3) in paragraph (5)(B)(i), as so redesignated, 

25 by striking ‘‘paragraph (5)’’ and inserting ‘‘para26 graph (6)’’; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 693 IS

1 (4) in paragraph (6), as so redesignated, by 

2 striking ‘‘paragraph (4)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘para3 graph (5)(B)’’. 

4 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

5 Section 719(e)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘section 8332(o)(5)’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘section 8332(o)(6)’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-87 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, June 19, 1996)

NRC RECEIVES CITATION FOR OUTSTANDING WORK AND FAMILY PROGRAMS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has been awarded an

Honorable Mention citation as a finalist in the 1996 Office of

Personnel Management's Director's Award for Outstanding Work and

Family Programs.

This awards program, begun in 1993, recognizes Federal

agencies with innovative and flexible programs to help employees

balance the demands of the workplace and their families. These

programs are intended as models for other agencies faced with the

challenges of maintaining employee productivity and motivation

while downsizing.

The citation credits the NRC, as an agency with an

increasingly diversified workforce, with becoming more responsive

to employee needs in areas such as child and elder care,

alternate work schedules, job-sharing, part-time employment, and

family medical leave policies.

The NRC is one of eight agencies recognized with an award or

Honorable Mention citation. The awards will be presented on June

20 at the Office of Personnel Management in Washington.

####
U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Fact Sheet 2008-3039

May 2008

California Water Science Center

Printed on recycled paper

SCIENCE TO HELP UNDERSTAND AND MANAGE

IMPORTANT GROUND-WATER RESOURCES

Throughout California, as pressure on water resources continues to grow, 

water-supply agencies are looking to the state’s biggest “reservoir” – its 

ground-water basins – for supply and storage. To better utilize that resource, 

the Sweetwater Authority and other local partners, including the city of San 

Diego and Otay Water Districts, are working with the U.S. Geological 

Survey (USGS) to develop the first comprehensive study of the coastal 

ground-water resources of southern San Diego County. USGS research is 

providing the integrated geologic and hydrologic knowledge necessary to 

help effectively utilize this resource on a coordinated, regional basis. 

USGS scientists are building a real-time well-monitoring network and 

gathering information about how the aquifers respond to different pumping 

and recharge-management strategies. Real-time ground-water levels are 

recorded every hour and are viewable on a project web site 

(http://ca.water.usgs.gov/sandiego/index.html). Data from the wells are 

helping to define the geology and hydrogeology of the area, define groundwater quality, and assess ground-water levels. The wells also are strategically placed and designed to be usable by the local agencies for decades to 

come to help manage surface-water and ground-water operations. 

Additionally, the knowledge gained from the USGS study will help local, 

state, and federal agencies; water purveyors; and USGS scientists to 

understand the effects of urbanization on the local surface-water, groundwater, and biological resources, and to better critique ideas and opportunities for additional ground-water development in the San Diego area.

A monitoring well 

site provides 

solar-powered 

transmission of 

real-time 

ground-water 

data.

For more information about the 

USGS Cooperative Water Program, contact: 

Donna Schiffer, Acting Director, 

U.S. Geological Survey, 

California Water Science Center

916/278-3000 schiffer@usgs.gov

http://water.usgs.gov/coop
§ 112.2 Bond or license required. ( a ) *Carriers.* A bond provided for in this part is required to transact business as a carrier receiving merchandise for transportation in bond.
( b ) *Cartmen and lightermen* — ( 1 ) *Necessity for bond.* A bond, as provided for in this part, is required to transact business as a cartman or lighterman. The cartage or lighterage of merchandise designated for examination, entered for warehouse, taken to container stations or centralized examination stations, taken into custody as unclaimed or destined for admission to a foreign trade zone may be done under the bond of a cartman or lighterman who is licensed pursuant to the provisions of this part or that of a bonded carrier, as provided for in paragraph (a) of this section. Foreign trade zone operators, bonded warehouse proprietors, container station operators and centralized examination station operators may engage in limited cartage or lighterage under their respective bonds. A foreign trade zone operator may engage in cartage or lighterage under his bond only for merchandise destined for his foreign trade zone and may also transport merchandise to his zone from anywhere within the district boundaries (see definition of “district” at § 112.1) where the foreign trade zone is located. A bonded warehouse proprietor may engage in cartage or lighterage under his bond only for merchandise destined for his bonded warehouse and may also transport merchandise to his warehouse from anywhere within the district boundaries (see definition of “district” at § 112.1) where the bonded warehouse is located. A container station operator may engage in cartage or lighterage under his bond only for merchandise destined for his container station and may also transport merchandise to his container station from anywhere within the district boundaries (see definition of “district” at § 112.1) where the container station is located. A centralized examination station operator may engage in cartage or lighterage under his bond only for merchandise destined for his centralized examination station and may also transport merchandise to his centralized examination station from anywhere within the district boundaries (see definition of “district” at § 112.1) where the centralized examination station is located.
( 2 ) *Necessity for license.* A license, as provided for in this part, is required to transact business as a cartman or lighterman for the cartage or lighterage of merchandise. Bonded carriers may engage in cartage and lighterage under their bonds without obtaining a license. Foreign trade zone operators, bonded warehouse proprietors, container station operators and centralized examination station operators may engage, under their bonds, in the limited cartage and lighterage and other transportation described in this paragraph without obtaining a license.
[T.D. 73-140, 38 FR 13551, May 23, 1973, as amended by T.D. 94-81, 59 FR 51494, Oct. 12, 1994; T.D. 95-77, 60 FR 50020, Sept. 27, 1995]
se 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 
se 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of 
se 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 3 of 
se 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 4 of 
se 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 5 of 
se 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 6 of 
se 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 7 of 
se 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 8 of 
se 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 9 of 
ase 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 10 

17
ase 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 11 

17
ase 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 12 

17
ase 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 13 

17
ase 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 14 

17
ase 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 15 

17
ase 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 16 

17
ase 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 17 

17
```

[106th Congress Public Law 339]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ339.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1313]]

Public Law 106-339
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1602 Frankford Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the ``Joseph 
F. Smith Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 19, 2000 -  [H.R. 4554]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1602 
Frankford Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and known as the 
Kensington Station, shall be known and designated as the ``Joseph F. 
Smith Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joseph F. Smith Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved October 19, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4554:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            July 18, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-98-45 July 17, 1998

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY

TO DISCUSS STARTUP OF UNIT 1 AT LASALLE NUCLEAR STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet Friday,

July 24, with Commonwealth Edison Company officials to discuss

the readiness for Unit 1 at the LaSalle Nuclear Power Station to

resume operation. The plant, which has two reactors, is located

near Seneca, Illinois.

The meeting will be at 10:00 a.m. at Brookfield Township

Hall, 2099 East 27th Road, Seneca, Illinois. The meeting is open

to public observation. NRC officials will be available at the

close of the meeting for questions and comments from the general

public and news media.

The two LaSalle units have been shut down since September

1996 for equipment modification and maintenance, staff

retraining, and other performance improvement activities. The

utility is currently planning to begin Unit 1 startup activities

at the end of this month. The Unit 2 startup schedule is about

six months after Unit 1.

In April of last year, the NRC staff issued a Confirmatory

Action Letter to Commonwealth Edison, confirming the utility's

agreement to develop a plan to address the plant's performance

deficiencies and to meet with the NRC staff when the first unit

was ready for restart.

The NRC has been conducting a special team inspection to

assess the readiness of Unit 1 to resume operations. The results

of that inspection and other recent NRC inspections will be

discussed at the July 24 meeting.

#####
----

----

I Informācija

Komisija

----

Eiro maiņas kurss (1)

2006. gada 6. janvāris

(2006/C 4/01)

1 eiro= 

----

(1)

Datu avots: atsauces maiņas kursu publicējusi ECB.

----

----

Iepriekšējs paziņojums par koncentrāciju

(Lieta Nr. COMP/M.4069 — Cognis B.V./Golden Hope Plantations BHD/JV)

Lieta, kas pretendē uz vienkāršotu procedūru

(2006/C 4/02)

(Dokuments attiecas uz EEZ)

----

(1)OV L 24, 29.1.2004., 1. lpp.

(2)OV C 56, 5.3.2005., 32. lpp.

----
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 97-03 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson January 7, 1996

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

NRC TO FINE GRANDIN TESTING LAB $2,500

FOR RADIOACTIVE GAUGE RULES VIOLATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $2,500 civil penalty against Grandin

Testing Lab, Inc., of Los Lunas, N.M., for using gauges containing radioactive material without

proper licenses.

The company is licensed to use moisture/density gauges, which use a radioactive source

to measure the compaction of soil at construction sites, in New Mexico, but NRC inspectors

discovered that the company had committed a violation of NRC rules when work was done with

the gauges at Kirtland Air Force Base in 1994 and 1995. Federal bases are under exclusive

federal regulation, and companies employing radioactive materials there must obtain a separate

federal license and pay additional license fees.

At a meeting held at NRC regional offices in Arlington, Texas, November 25, Robert E.

Grandin, president of Grandin Testing Lab, said that he did not understand NRC requirements for

an additional license. The Air Force sent the company a letter in February notifying it that license

forms had not been submitted, but Grandin said the matter was handled by an employee. The

employee obtained the forms but left the company for an extended period without completing

them.

L. Joe Callan, NRC Region IV Regional Administrator, said, in a letter to Granding Testing

Lab, Inc., that the company displayed "a careless disregard" for federal requirements. "Your

actions denied the NRC an opportunity to inspect and to assure that you were conducting your

activities in accordance with all safety requirements," Mr. Callan said.

Mr. Callan also warned the company that further deliberate violations of NRC rules could

lead to criminal and civil sanctions including banning the company from using instruments

containing radioactive materials.

The company must respond to the Notice of Violation in writing within 30 days. The

response must document specific actions taken to prevent recurrence of the violations. During

this time the company may pay the fine or file a protest.
O rder filed August 25 , 2022



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________

No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 069

- CR

__________
GARY COLMAN LANDRETH , Appellant

V.

THE S TATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 70 t h District Court
Ector County, Texas
Tri al Court Cause No. A

- 19

- 1203

- CR

O R D E R
We issue this order in regard to exhibits that are missing from the reporter’s
record that was filed in this court on July 22, 2022. T he court reporter for the 7 0 t h
District Court, Tina Gregg, has notified this court that she will not provide this court

w ith the missing exhibits without an order from this court “ demanding that [ she ]

send them up and copying [her] judge

. ” The exhibits at issue are “Children
Advocacy videos” that were admitted into evidence as exhibits during trial

. We note

that appellate counsel requested that all exhibits be included in the reporter’s record.2 Therefore, pursuant to Rule 34.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all
exhibits admitted into evidence by the trial court should have been included i n the
reporter’s record previously filed by Gregg in this cause

. By this order, Tina Gregg i s ORDERED to file in this cause a supplemental
reporter’s record containing copies of the exhibits that were admitted at trial
but were omitted from the reporter ’s record previously filed in this cause

. The
supplemental reporter’s record is due to be filed in this court on or before
Septembe r 8

, 20 22

.

PER CURIAM

August 25 , 2022
Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey , C.J., Trotter , J., and Williams , J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-7829-2]

The Charter for the Environmental Protection Agency's Gulf of Mexico Program Policy Review Board (GMPPRB) will be renewed for an additional two-year period, as a necessary committee which is in the public interest, in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. 2 § 9(c). The purpose of GMPPRB is to provide advice and recommendations to the Administrator of EPA on issues associated with plans to improve and protect the water quality and living resources of the Gulf of Mexico.

It is determined that GMPPRB is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Agency by law.

                    Inquiries may be directed to Gloria Car, Designated Federal Officer, U.S. EPA, Gulf of Mexico Program Office (Mail Code: EPA/GMPO), Stennis Space Center, MS, 39529, Telephone (228) 688-2421, or                     *car.gloria@epa.gov.*

Dated: July 9, 2004.

Benjamin H. Grumbles,

Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Water.

[FR Doc. 04-23451  Filed 10-19-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
State of California

California Environmental Protection Agency

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Addendum to the Final Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking, Including 

Summary of Comments and Agency Response for the Technical Status and 

Revisions to On-Board Diagnostic System Requirements for Heavy-Duty Engines, 

Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, Medium-Duty Vehicles and Engines

Public Hearing Date: August 23, 2012

Agenda Item No.: 12-5-2

I. Background

On June 27, 2013, the Air Resources Board (ARB) submitted a Final Rulemaking 

Package, amending sections 1968.2, 1968.5, 1971.1, and 1971.5, title 13, California 

Code of Regulations (CCR), to California’s Office of Administrative Law (OAL) for its 

review and approval, OAL Regulatory Action No. 2013-0627-02S. In the course of its 

review, OAL requested additional information and clarification of some points.

II. Alternatives Analysis 

ARB determined, based on supporting information in the file, that no alternative 

considered by the agency would be more effective in carrying out the purpose for which 

the regulation was proposed, would be as effective and less burdensome to affected 

private persons than the adopted regulation, or would be more cost effective to affected 

private persons and equally effective in implementing the statutory policy or other 

provision of law.

III. Summary of 45-Day Comment

ARB inadvertently failed to completely respond to Comment Number 21, on 

page 19 of the Final Statement of Reasons from EMA.

Comment: First, it based its cost estimates on manufacturers’ nationwide sales of 

engines and vehicles, which is misleading and improper since this is a California rule.

.

Response: Staff based the cost estimates on nationwide sales of engines and vehicle 

because it is assumed that heavy-duty engine manufacturers will produce an engine 

that will be sold nationwide and that complies with both California and federal 

regulations. The U.S. EPA’s regulation directly allows acceptance of HD OBD systems 

that have been certified to California’s HD OBD regulation, and generally all heavy-duty 

manufacturers have chosen this path for certification. The manufacturer will most likely 

not produce engines that will apply only to California and then produce other engines 

that will apply to the rest of the states, since it is not cost effective. So staff believes it is 

reasonable to calculate the incremental costs per engine based on nationwide sales.
### §1501. Pensions

The United States Court of Federal Claims shall not have jurisdiction of any claim for a pension.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 942; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §133(e)(1), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §250(1) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §145, 36 Stat. 1136).

Section constitutes the exception in section 250(1) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "United States Claims Court" for "Court of Claims".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.