alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-98-64 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Tuesday, December 1, 1998)

PHOTO/VIDEO AVAILABILITY AND REVISED MEDIA AVAILABILITY TIME

FOR NRC CHAIRMAN’S VISIT TO DOE SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson will visit the U.S.

Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site Thursday, December 3 and Friday,

December 4 to tour portions of the facility and meet with site officials. In a news release

issued yesterday, it was announced that Chairman Jackson would be available Friday at

12:30 p.m. to discuss her visit and answer questions from interested news media

representatives. That media availability will now be Friday at 11:00 a.m.

In addition, interested photographers and videographers will be able to get pictures of

Chairman Jackson during her visit at 9:00 a.m. Friday. Any media representative

interested in photos or video should plan to arrive at the site by 8:00 a.m. for security

processing and should contact Bill Taylor at 803-725-2889 before Friday.

Media representatives coming to the site for either the photo or media availability or both

should go to the same location:

Media representatives coming from Augusta should go south on Highway 125 past the

Town of Jackson. Turn left on Road SR-1 at large blue “Savannah River Site” sign (do not

go to the barricade). Travel east for about three miles and there will be several buildings

and large parking lots on your right. Go past the entrance sign, turn right at the “Aiken

(parking) Lot” sign into the parking lot. Go to the end of the parking lot, turn right and

media parking will be reserved. Enter at the gate in the green chain link fence into Building

703-41A. Security and public affairs representatives will be there to assist you.

To get there from Aiken, go south on Highway 19 past the Town of New Ellenton. Just

after the traffic light that intersects Highway 278, there will be a large blue “Savannah

River Site” sign. Turn right on Highway SR-1 (do not go to the barricade). Travel west for

about five miles. Go past the traffic light, and turn left at the “Aiken (parking) Lot” sign into

the parking lot. Go to the end of the parking lot, turn right and media parking will be

reserved. Enter at the gate in the green chain link fence into Building 703-41A. Security

and public affairs representatives will be there to assist you.

###
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-150 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Thursday, October 9,

1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a

meeting October 21 and 22 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will

begin at 8:30 a.m. each day. The October 21 session will be held

in Room T-2B3, and the October 22 session in Room T-2B1, of the

NRC's Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike.

The Subcommittee on Reliability and Probabilistic Risk Assessment

will continue its review of matters related to the Staff

Requirements Memo dated May 27, regarding the use of uncertainty

versus point values in the PRA-related regulatory decision-making

process. The subcommittee also will review the proposed Standard

Review Plan sections and Regulatory Guides for risk-informed,

performance-based regulation.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, will be described in a Notice of Meeting

published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

#
### §177. Board of inquiry

#### (a) Composition

A board of inquiry shall be composed of a chairman and such other members as the President shall determine, and shall have power to sit and act in any place within the United States and to conduct such hearings either in public or in private, as it may deem necessary or proper, to ascertain the facts with respect to the causes and circumstances of the dispute.

#### (b) Compensation

Members of a board of inquiry shall receive compensation at the rate of $50 for each day actually spent by them in the work of the board, together with necessary travel and subsistence expenses.

#### (c) Powers of discovery

For the purpose of any hearing or inquiry conducted by any board appointed under this title, the provisions of sections 49 and 50 of title 15 (relating to the attendance of witnesses and the production of books, papers, and documents) are made applicable to the powers and duties of such board.

(June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title II, §207, 61 Stat. 155.)
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-01-013 June 6, 2001 

 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov 

 

NRC TO MEET WITH TVA OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with TVA officials on Wednesday,

June 13, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety performance at the Browns Ferry

nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. (CDT) at the Browns Ferry Training Center, Auditorium

Room 201, at the plant site near Athens, Alabama. The public is invited to observe the meeting. NRC

officials will be available after the meeting to answer questions. The NRC will hold a second meeting

with state and local government officials after the first meeting. That second meeting is also open to

the public.

A letter sent from NRC Region II to TVA, which addresses plant safety performance during the

previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from the Region II Office of

Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr. Current information for the plant is

available at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BF2/bf2_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BF3/bf3_chart.html.

###
§ 115.63 Application for approval. Each application by a manufacturer for certification of a road vehicle by design type must include: ( a ) Three copies, each no larger than 3 feet by 4 feet, of the Customs and TIR plan;
( b ) Customs and TIR plan number;
( c ) Three copies of the specifications which include the following information: ( 1 ) The name and address of the manufacturer and the owner; and
( 2 ) A description of the road vehicle including the: ( i ) Particulars of construction;
( ii ) Dimensions;
( iii ) Construction materials; and
( iv ) Marks and numbers, including chassis, engine, and registration numbers.
( d ) A statement signed by the manufacturer that: ( 1 ) It will present vehicles of the type concerned to the Certifying Authority which that Authority may wish to examine;
( 2 ) Permit the Certifying Authority to examine further units at any time during or after the production run;
( 3 ) Notify the Certifying Authority of each change in the design or specifications before adoption;
( 4 ) Mark the road vehicles in a visible place with the identification number or letters of the design type and the serial number of the vehicle in the type series manufacturer's number; and
( 5 ) Keep a record of vehicles manufactured according to the design type.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-22702-CIV-ALTONAGA/Goodman

NORMA N. TELLO,

Plaintiff,

v.

CREST HOTEL GROUP LLC,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Order 

Approving Settlement and Dismissing Case with Prejudice [ECF No. 17], filed August 20, 2020. 

The parties seek approval of their Settlement Agreement and Release of FLSA Claims (the 

“Agreement”) [ECF No. 17-1],1 which includes a provision for the award of attorney’s fees. Upon 

review of the record and the parties’ documented basis for a settlement of this FLSA case, 

including an award of attorney’s fees and costs to Plaintiff, Norma N. Tello’s counsel, the Court 

finds settlement of this action is fair and reasonable. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Joint Motion for Entry of Order Approving Settlement and Dismissing Case with 

Prejudice [ECF No. 17] is GRANTED. 

2. The Settlement Agreement and Release of FLSA Claims [ECF No. 17-1] between 

1 The Agreement contains a confidentiality provision. (See Agreement ¶ 16). Where the Court must 

approve a settlement, the agreement becomes a part of the judicial record, and therefore may not be deemed 

confidential even if the parties so consent. See Jessup v. Luther, 277 F.3d 926, 929–30 (7th Cir. 2002). 

Accordingly, parties may not submit a settlement agreement under seal or seek its review in camera unless 

there is a compelling interest in secrecy. See id. at 928. While paragraph 16 of the Agreement seems to 

indicate the parties seek to maintain the Agreement’s confidentiality, the parties did not file the Agreement 

under seal, so it appears on the public docket.

Case 1:20-cv-22702-CMA Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2020 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 20-22702-CIV-ALTONAGA/Goodman

2

Plaintiff, Norma N. Tello, and Defendant, Crest Hotel Group, LLC, which has been 

duly filed as a record of the Court, is APPROVED in its entirety.

3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and 

attorney’s fees except as otherwise agreed.

4. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

5. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement and 

Release of FLSA Claims.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 20th day of August, 2020.

 _________________________________

 CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record 

Case 1:20-cv-22702-CMA Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### Mathews et al. v. Hale.

June 19, 1945.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing Oct. 16, 1945.

'C. R. Luker for appellants.

S. V. Little for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

Van Sant, Commissioner

Affirming.

Appellants filed the action against appellee, in an endeavor to enjoin Mm. from continuing to use á roadway tMougli their farm in Laurel County. The regular Judge of the Laurel Circuit Court granted a temporary injunction, which was dissolved by Judge Cammack, in concurrence with three other Judges of this Court. On return of the-case, additional evidence was introduced by both parties and the cause submitted, by agreement, to a special Judge, who denied the injunction and dismissed the petition.

There is but one issue, and that is one of fact, viz., whether the passway in question is-public-or private in its character. We have read carefully all of the evidence contained in the record. Appellants introduced several witnesses who testified that the road is a private pass-way, or to facts from which an inference to that effect reasonably may be drawn. Appellee introduced several witnesses who testified that the road is a public passway, or to facts from which an inference to that effect reasonably may be drawn. The evidence obviously is conflicting. This Court will not disturb the finding of fact of a chancellor on conflicting testimony, unless it is clearly against the weight of the evidence, which it is not in *613this case. Lipps et al. v. Marcum, 297 Ky. 225, 179 S. W. 2d 884.

Judgment affirmed.
0-cr-06219-WDF Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2000 P
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-185 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, September 1, 1999)

NRC RELEASES PREVIOUSLY CONTAMINATED SITE IN OHIO

FOR UNRESTRICTED USE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has released a site owned by the Elkem Metals

Company near Marietta, Ohio, for unrestricted use following cleanup of radioactive

contamination to safe levels.

The former owner of the site, the Union Carbide Company, attempted to extract

tantalum and columbium (non-radioactive metals) from the soil beginning in 1955. The work

was performed under a license from the former Atomic Energy Commission. The raw material

for the process was tin slag, imported from Thailand, which contained the radioactive elements

thorium and uranium. Operations at the facility ceased in 1970.

The facility was sold to the Elkem Metals Company in 1981 which used it to produce

chromium and manganese alloys. A separate facility on site, which also produces manganese

electrodes for dry cell batteries, was sold to Ralston Purina in 1986.

In the early 1980s, Union Carbide began cleaning up the facility to reduce radioactive

contaminants. About 9,000 cubic meters of soil were transported to a processing facility owned

by Union Carbide in Uravan, Colorado. After an NRC site review, the agency declared the

decontamination successful. But in 1992 an Elkem employee found additional contamination at

the site, and a subsequent survey indicated that levels of radioactivity exceeded safety limits in

certain areas. The site was then added to the NRC’s Site Decommissioning Management Plan,

which identifies about 34 sites around the country that are contaminated with radioactive

materials and warrant special atttention to ensure proper cleanup.

After initial remediation was completed in December 1994, contaminated materials were

stored on site in steel containers. In 1997, arrangements were made with the State of Colorado

to transfer these materials to the Union Carbide uranium mill, also in Uravan.

Final surveys by Elkem and Union Carbide were followed up with confirmatory surveys

by the NRC and the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education between 1995 and 1998.

NRC and the Oak Ridge organization also conducted a series of inspections before releasing

the site for unrestricted use.

The site covers an area of approximately three acres, where contamination was located

in one building, and on soil, concrete pads and equipment, and in two smaller buildings.

###
### §6511. Liquidation from appropriations of any unpaid obligations chargeable to rescinded unexpended balances of funds

If at the close of any fiscal year there is an unexpended balance of funds which were appropriated for such year (or for prior fiscal years) and which are subject to disbursement by the Secretary of the Senate for any purpose, then, if such unexpended balance is by law rescinded, any unpaid obligations chargeable to the balance so rescinded (or to appropriations for such purpose for prior years) shall be liquidated from any appropriations for the same general purpose, which, at the time of payment, are available for disbursement.

(Pub. L. 97–257, title I, §106, Sept. 10, 1982, 96 Stat. 849.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 68d of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1982.
#### § 147.47 Mandatory abandonment.

Any article entered for a fair, and not disposed of under the provisions of this subpart prior to the expiration of 3 months after the close of the fair shall be regarded as abandoned to the Government, and subject to sale or destruction. Proceeds of sale shall be disposed of in the manner provided in sections 491, 492, and 493, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and the regulations thereunder. (See subpart D of part 127 of this chapter.) Any duties or internal revenue taxes on such article shall be computed on the basis of its condition and quantity at the time it becomes subject to sale.

[T.D. 70-134, 35 FR 9268, June 13, 1970, as amended by T.D. 74-114, 39 FR 12095, Apr. 3, 1974]
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Richard Tobias, * From the 3 5th District Court

of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CV1903123

.

Vs. No. 11

- 19

- 00 247

- C V * June 2 4 , 2021

SLP Brownwood LLC d/b/a * Memorand um Opinion by Bailey

, C. J.

Cross Country Healthcare Center, (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.

, the Owners of SLP Management, Inc., T rotter , J., and Williams, J. )

and Dr. N. Nigalye,

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of

this appeal are taxed against Richard Tobias.
### §2916a. Transferred

Section, Pub. L. 105–277, div. C, title IV, §414(c), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–653; Pub. L. 106–313, title I, §111, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1257; Pub. L. 108–447, div. J, title IV, §428, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3358; Pub. L. 113–128, title V, §512(a), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1705, which related to job training grants, was transferred to section 3224a of this title.
#### In the Matter of St. Paul’s Place and Washington Avenue.

Referee’s report confirmed, balance due to infants to be paid to their general guardian, when such guardian is duly appointed and has given the security required by law. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Step 4: Consideration of Motions to Compel 

Arbitration/Dismiss

Step 3: Additional Briefing

Step 2: Motions to Strike/Action Stayed

Step 1: Special Interrogatories

Threshold Question

Motion to Stay 

(18 U.S.C. § 981(g)(1))

Grant, actions 

are stayed

Deny, actions 

proceed pursuant 

to Rule G

Claimants must respond to special 

interrogatories or move to stay

(Rule G(6)(a)-(c))

Government does 

not move to strike 

or court denies 

motion

Government can be required to respond 

to motions to compel 

arbitration/dismiss

(Rule G(6)(c))

Consideration of motions to 

compel arbitration/dismiss

(Rule G((8)(c)(ii)(A))

Actions 

proceed to 

discovery

Actions are 

dismissed or 

stayed

Government moves 

to strike claims 

based on respones 

(Rule G(8)(c)(i)(B))

Government moves 

to strike claims for 

lack of response

(Rule G(8)(c)(i)(A))

Claimants move to 

stay 

(18 U.S.C. § 981(g)(2))

Court may consider motions 

regarding restraining orders

Arbitration 

of Treatyrelated 

Claims

EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:20-cv-23278-MGC Document 72-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2021 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 142

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 142.41 Line Release.

Line Release is an automated system designed to release and tract repetitive shipments. It is a method of entry or immediate delivery extended to importers of merchandise which CBP deems to be repetitive and high volume. Line Release may be used only at locations approved by CBP for handling Line Release. At certain high-risk locations along the land borders of the United States (the locations to be published in the Federal Register), which are approved by CBP for handling Line Release, the use of Line Release for particular shipments may be denied by CBP unless the imported merchandise is transported by carriers that participate in a CBP-approved industry partnership program.

[T.D. 92-93, 57 FR 44093, as amended by T.D. 99-2, 64 FR 33, Jan. 4, 1999; CBP Dec. 11-04, 76 FR 6690, Feb. 8, 2011]
### §117b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 117b was editorially reclassified as section 6630 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2

Ener1, Inc.500 West
Cypress Creek Road-Suite 100 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, 33309

August 13, 2004

Securities and Exchange
Commission450 5th Street, NWWashington, DC 20549

Re: Certification Of
Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the
quarter ended June 30, 2004, I, Randall Paulfus, Chief Financial Officer of Ener1, Inc.,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1) | such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2004,
fully            complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;            and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2) | the
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the
quarter ended June 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Ener1, Inc.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By:
                    /s/ Randall Paulfus
                        Randall Paulfus
                        Chief Financial Officer
                        (Principal Financial and Accounting
                        Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc.
and will be retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

In accordance with Item 601 of
Regulation S-K, this certification is being furnished as
Exhibit 32.1 to Ener1, Inc.s quarterly report and shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section,
nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of
1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
filing.
#### § 145.52 Literature concerning devices for unlawful abortion.

Mail articles containing literature or advertisements concerning devices to produce unlawful abortions, are prohibited from the mails by 18 U.S.C. 1461, and shall be retained by, or delivered to, the Postal Service for disposition under the postal laws and regulations. If the Postal Service determines in any case that it is proper to release the material to the addressee, it shall be submitted for Customs treatment before delivery.

[T.D. 78-99, 43 FR 13061, Mar. 29, 1978, as amended by T.D. 78-102, 43 FR 14455, Apr. 6, 1978]
### §1901b. Joint oversight hearings

#### (a) In General

The Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate and the Committee on House Administration of the House of Representatives (referred to in this section as the "Committees") are authorized to jointly conduct oversight hearings regarding the Capitol Police Board and may request the attendance of all members of the Capitol Police Board at any such hearing. Members of the Capitol Police Board shall attend a joint hearing under this section, as requested and under such rules or procedures as may be adopted by the Committees.

#### (b) Timing

The Committees may conduct oversight hearings under this section as determined appropriate by the Committees, but shall conduct not less than one oversight hearing under this section during each Congress.

(Pub. L. 117–77, §3, Dec. 22, 2021, 135 Stat. 1523.)