alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                                   ----------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of RemoteMDx, Inc. on Form 10-KSB
for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David G. Derrick, Chief
Executive Officer and Michael G. Acton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                              /s/David G. Derrick
                                              -------------------
                                              David G. Derrick
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              RemoteMDx, Inc.


                                              /s/Michael G. Acton
                                              -------------------
                                              Michael G. Acton
                                              Chief Financial Officer



Dated: June 15, 2005
### §1433. Nondiscrimination rules of House and Senate

The Select Committee on Ethics of the Senate and the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct of the House of Representatives retain full power, in accordance with the authority provided to them by the Senate and the House, with respect to the discipline of Members, officers, and employees for violating rules of the Senate and the House on nondiscrimination in employment.

(Pub. L. 104–1, title V, §503, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 40.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Standards of Official Conduct of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Ethics of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22923]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Declaration of Military Reservist Economic Injury Disaster Loan 
<greek-i>R405

    As a result of Public Law 106-50, the Veterans Entrepreneurship and 
Small Business Development Act of 1999, this notice establishes the 
application filing period for the Military Reservist Economic Injury 
Disaster Loan program. Effective October 1, 2004, small businesses 
employing military reservists may apply for economic injury disaster 
loans if those employees are called up to active duty during a period 
of military conflict existing on or after March 24, 1999 and those 
employees are essential to the success of the small business daily 
operations. The filing period for small businesses to apply for 
economic injury loan assistance under the Military Reservist Economic 
Injury Disaster Loan Program begins on the date the essential employee 
is ordered to active duty and ends on the date 90 days after the 
essential employee is discharged or released from active duty.
    The purpose of the Military Reservist economic injury disaster loan 
program (MREIDL) is to provide funds to eligible small businesses to 
meet its ordinary and necessary operating expenses that it could have 
met, but is unable to meet, because an essential employee was called-up 
to active duty in their role as a military reservist. These loans are 
intended only to provide the amount of working capital needed by a 
small business to pay its necessary obligations as they mature until 
operations return to normal after the essential employee is released 
from active military duty.
    Applications for loans for military reservist economic injury loans 
may be obtained and filed at the address listed below: U.S. Small 
Business Administration, Disaster Area 4 Office, P.O. Box 419004, 
Sacramento, CA 95841-9004, 1-800-488-5323.
    The interest rate for eligible small businesses is 4.000 percent. 
The number assigned for economic injury is R40500.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59002)


    Dated: October 5, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-22923 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-02 February 11, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC CHAIRMAN RICHARD A. MESERVE

AVAILABLE TO THE MEDIA AT COMANCHE PEAK

Dr. Richard A. Meserve, Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, is visiting the

Comanche Peak nuclear power plant near Glen Rose, Texas, on February 16 and will be available to

speak to the media at 4 p.m. in the plant’s Visitor’s Center auditorium following his plant tour.

The visitor’s center is located five miles north of Glen Rose on state highway FM 56.

Dr. Meserve will be available to answer questions on a full range of topics affecting Comanche

Peak and the NRC. These may include the recent change in policy reducing the number of resident

inspectors assigned to multi-unit sites such as Comanche Peak, and the significant change in the

methods the NRC will use to assess plant safety performance, which will be adopted for all plants this

spring.

Dr. Meserve was sworn in as Chairman of the NRC on October 29 last year. Prior to that he

was a partner in the Washington, D.C., law firm of Covington & Burling, having joined the firm in

1981. From 1977 to 1981, Dr. Meserve served on the White House staff as legal counsel to the

President’s Science and Technology Advisor. He holds a B.A. degree from Tufts University, a law

degree from Harvard University and a Ph.D. in applied physics from Stanford University .

###
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify
that the foregoing Annual Report of CLAIMSNET.COM INC. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the "Report"):

     (1) Fully complies with the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) Fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
         result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Paul W. Miller

Paul W. Miller
 Chief Financial Officer
March 26, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23525]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Theatrical Dealers Association D/B/A 
Entertainment Services and Technology Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 9, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Theatrical Dealers 
Association d/b/a Entertainment Services and Technology Association 
(``ESTA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plantiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Theatrical 
Dealers Association d/b/a Entertainment Services and Technology 
Association, New York, NY. The nature and scope of ESTA's standards 
development activities are: The development of technical standards used 
in the entertainment industry, principally in the live entertainment 
industry, that promote compatibility among equipment, products, and 
systems of competing manufacturers or that are designed to prevent 
unreasonable risks of injury to either persons or property through 
equipment or products or the manner in which they are to be used.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23525 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Huguenot Trust Company, Respondent, v. Robert D. Ireland, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 142

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 142.50 Line Release data base corrections or changes.

The applicant shall notify the port director of any changes in names, importer or filer numbers or bond information on a Line Release Data Loading Sheet as soon as possible. Notification shall be accomplished by the submission of a copy of the original loading sheet with a Correction Data Loading Sheet.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6419

ELMER CONNELL TAYLOR, 

 Petitioner – Appellant, 

 v. 

BUTCH JACKSON, 

 Respondent – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (5:07-hc-02171-H) 

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Elmer Connell Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, 

III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Elmer Connell Taylor seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) 

petition and has moved this court for a certificate of 

appealability. A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the 

district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive 

procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. 

See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 

683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the 

record and conclude that Taylor has not made the requisite 

showing. Accordingly, we deny Taylor’s motion for a certificate 

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
### §§891 to 892a. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–300, title I, §184(a)(1), Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1357

Section 891, Pub. L. 93–203, title IV, §401, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1974, set out Congressional declaration of purpose for youth employment and training programs.

A prior section 891, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §321, as added Pub. L. 95–93, title II, §201, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 632, provided for a Congressional declaration of purpose with respect to youth employment, training and demonstration programs, prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

A prior section 401 of Pub. L. 93–203, title IV, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 863, which provided for a congressional statement of purpose with respect to the Job Corps program, was classified to former section 911 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former section 874 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 892, Pub. L. 93–203, title IV, §402, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1974, provided definitions of "eligible youth" under various youth programs.

A prior section 892, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §325, as added Pub. L. 95–93, title II, §201, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 632, related to authorization of youth incentive entitlement pilot projects, prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

A prior section 402 of Pub. L. 93–203, title IV, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 864, related to establishment of a Job Corps and was classified to former section 912 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 892a, Pub. L. 93–203, title IV, §403, as added Pub. L. 97–35, title VII, §701(e)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 520, related to transferability of funds for youth programs.

A prior section 892a, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §326, as added Pub. L. 95–93, title II, §201, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 633, related to guarantees of employment opportunities, prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Sections 892b to 892d of this title were eliminated in the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 892b, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §327, as added Pub. L. 95–93, title II, §201, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 633, related to selection of prime sponsors.

Section 892c, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §328, as added Pub. L. 95–93, title II, §201, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 635, related to special provisions for development of a participants role as a member of the community and for restrictions on use of funds.

Section 892d, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §329, as added Pub. L. 95–93, title II, §201, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 635, related to reports to Congress.
#### The Frick Collection et al., Respondents, v. Nathaniel L. Goldstein, as Attorney-General of the State of New York, Respondent, and Helen C. Frick, Appellant.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1053.]
No: 23-070 November 1, 2023 

CONTACT: Office of Public Affairs, 301-415-8200 

NRC Statement on the Death of Former Commissioner Forrest J. Remick

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued the following 

statement on behalf of the NRC Commission and staff, regarding the 

passing of former NRC Commissioner Forrest J. Remick. 

“Dr. Remick has the distinction of being the only person ever to 

serve the agency as an NRC office director, an administrative judge with 

our Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, a chairman of NRC’s Advisory 

Committee on Reactor Safeguards, and then as an NRC Commissioner,” 

said NRC Chair Christopher T. Hanson. “He also had a distinguished 

career in the nuclear engineering department at Pennsylvania State 

University. We are deeply saddened by his death.”
Order entered August 15, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00615-CR

EX PARTE JAMES MICHAEL DRAUCKER

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. WR-1-22-0006

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 10, 2022 pro se motion seeking to 

amend his brief to request substance abuse treatment. Appellant is represented by 

counsel, and he is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Ex parte Bohannan,

350 S.W.3d 116, 116 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). Accordingly, appellant’s pro se 

motion is DENIED without prejudice.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
8/14/22, 11:05 PM Screenshot_20220728-144435_Messages.jpg

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Fw199qeTaIcQdoc7Rd-d8iS6bZ3e7IIF 1/1

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-48 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 6
8/14/22, 11:06 PM Screenshot_20220728-144446_Messages.jpg

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Fw199qeTaIcQdoc7Rd-d8iS6bZ3e7IIF 1/1

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-48 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of 6
8/14/22, 11:00 PM Screenshot_20220728-144522_Messages.jpg

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Fw199qeTaIcQdoc7Rd-d8iS6bZ3e7IIF 1/1

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-48 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 3 of 6
8/14/22, 10:59 PM Screenshot_20220728-144457_Messages.jpg

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Fw199qeTaIcQdoc7Rd-d8iS6bZ3e7IIF 1/1

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-48 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 4 of 6
8/14/22, 11:14 PM Screenshot_20220728-150646_Messages.jpg

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Fw199qeTaIcQdoc7Rd-d8iS6bZ3e7IIF 1/1

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-48 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 5 of 6
8/14/22, 11:33 PM Screenshot_20220729-085235_Messenger.jpg

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Fw199qeTaIcQdoc7Rd-d8iS6bZ3e7IIF 1/1

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-48 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 6 of 6
### §46f–1. Repealed. Feb. 27, 1956, ch. 74, §2(b), 70 Stat. 32

Section, act July 2, 1954, ch. 455, title I, 68 Stat. 402, fixed maximum minute allowance on long distance telephone calls of House Members, Delegates, and Resident Commissioner.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Act Feb. 27, 1956, ch. 74, §3, 70 Stat. 32, provided that: "The amendments made by this Act [amending sections 46f and 46g of this title and repealing this section] shall take effect as of noon on January 3, 1956."
TiB{] OF 

Q i i 0 Rnemorandum 

U.S.Department of , . ^~, ,. ,-, 

Transportotion - i - A- _,U _ 

Office of The secretary 

of Transportof lon 

Essential Air Service at Chisholin/Hibbing, Minnesota 

(Docket DOT-OST-2003-15796) ^ -, ,, n^,, 

Subject: Thief River Falls, Minnesota Date: April 11,2011 

(Docket DOT-OST-2001-10642) 

Reply 

T)ennis J. Del^ny, Chief ^^^ ^ " ^^ Michael Martin, X-53 

From: EAS & Domestic Analysis, X-53 Attn. Ext. 66494 

of: 

To: Dockets Operations, M-30 

By Order 2011-4-1, April 1, 2011, we requested proposals for essential air service (EAS) at 

Chisholm/Hibbing andThief River Falls, Mimiesota, no later than May 3,2011. 

By email dated April 5, 2011, Delta Air Lines (Delta) indicated that it continues to evaluate 

utilization of the aircraft type currently servicing the two communities, and that those decisions 

will not be completed in time for the development of a longer-term proposal to serve the two 

communities. Delta has requested that we extend the due date for proposals to August 1, 2011. 

With suppoit from the communities, and to encourage additional bids for EAS service, we have 

decided to grant Delta's request. All parties must now file competitive proposals for EAS at 

Chisholm/HibbingandThief River Falls no later than August 1, 2011.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.532 Integrated Sourcing Initiative. ( a ) For purposes of General Note 25(b)(ii), HTSUS, a good is eligible for treatment as an originating good under the Integrated Sourcing Initiative if: ( 1 ) The good, in its condition as imported, is both classified in a tariff provision enumerated in the first column of General Note 25(m), HTSUS, and described opposite that tariff provision in the list of information technology articles set forth in the second column of General Note 25(m), HTSUS;
( 2 ) The good, regardless of its origin, is imported into the territory of the United States from the territory of Singapore. If a product of a non-Party, the good must have been imported into Singapore prior to its importation into the territory of the United States; and
( 3 ) The good satisfies the conditions and requirements of § 10.542 relating to third country transportation.
( b ) A good enumerated in General Note 25(m), HTSUS, that is used in the production of another good in Singapore will not be considered an originating material for purposes of determining the eligibility for preferential tariff treatment of such other good unless: ( 1 ) The good enumerated in General Note 25(m), HTSUS, satisfies an applicable rule of origin set out in General Note 25(o), HTSUS; or
( 2 ) The good enumerated in General Note 25(m), HTSUS, is imported into the territory of Singapore from the territory of the United States prior to being used in the production of a good in Singapore.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-114 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-071 April 19, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, ON MAY 11-13

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

(ACRS) has scheduled a meeting on May 11 - 13 in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss, among other

items, last January’s operating event at the Hatch Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, in Georgia.

The meeting, most of which will be open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the

agency’s Two White Flint Building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, starting at 8:30 a.m. each day.

On the first day, the committee will discuss: initiatives related to risk-informed technical

specifications; potential revisions to the pressurized thermal shock acceptance criterion; a proposed

revision to Regulatory Guide 1.174, “An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in RiskInformed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis;” and a proposed regulatory

guide and standard review plan section associated with analytical codes.

On May 12, the day’s agenda will include discussions of SECY-00-0062, the “Risk Informed

Regulation Implementation Plan;” the findings and recommendations of the agency’s Augmented

Inspection Team, which investigated the January 26 reactor trip event at Hatch; as well as the physical

security requirements for power reactors.

The following day’s schedule will feature the continuation of proposed ACRS reports and

miscellaneous activities.

Those who seek additional information on the meeting or schedule changes should contact Sam

Duraiswamy, at 301-415-7364.

Other aspects of the meeting will be described in an upcoming edition of the Federal Register.

ACRS meeting notices, transcripts and letter reports are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

###