alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    5
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       132123
<SECURITIES>                                 227977
<RECEIVABLES>                                7619563
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (95682)
<INVENTORY>                                  3979066
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             14704781
<PP&E>                                       2040313
<DEPRECIATION>                               (1353123)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               27043241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        12956869
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     59125
<OTHER-SE>                                   12224449
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 27043241
<SALES>                                      4450964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6266819
<CGS>                                        3137931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2862122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           281666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              847001
<INCOME-TAX>                                 381129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          465872
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 465872
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.09
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                                  SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 3, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W. Kerry Jackson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ W. Kerry Jackson
------------------
Chief Financial Officer
June 11, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Shoe Carnival, Inc. and will be retained by Shoe Carnival, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Mary F. McKinney, Respondent, v. Richard F. Fradenburgh, Appellant. George McKinney, Respondent, v. Richard F. Fradenburgh, Appellant.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Deyo, Santry and Bergan, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.3025 Transit and transshipment. ( a ) *General.* A good that has undergone production necessary to qualify as an originating good under § 10.3014 will not be considered an originating good if, subsequent to that production, the good: ( 1 ) Undergoes further production or any other operation outside the territories of the Parties, other than unloading, reloading, or any other operation necessary to preserve the good in good condition or to transport the good to the territory of a Party; or
( 2 ) Does not remain under the control of customs authorities in the territory of a non-Party.
( b ) *Documentary evidence.* An importer making a claim that a good is originating may be required to demonstrate, to CBP's satisfaction, that the conditions and requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section were met. An importer may demonstrate compliance with this section by submitting documentary evidence. Such evidence may include, but is not limited to, bills of lading, airway bills, packing lists, commercial invoices, receiving and inventory records, and customs entry and exit documents.
EXHIBIT “C”

Case 1:20-cv-23235-RNS Document 8-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:20-cv-23235-RNS Document 8-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:20-cv-23235-RNS Document 8-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 3 of 3
Wayne National Forest

Hiking

Ironton Ranger District

The Ironton Ranger District 

offers eight trail systems 

(135 miles of trail) open to 

hikers and backpackers. Two of the systems: Hanging

Rock and Pine Creek (46 miles) are primarily for offhighway vehicle use. The 46-mile Vesuvius Horse 

Trail, was developed primarily for equestrian use. 

Hikers may use these trails but over 43 miles of other 

trails are exclusively for hiking and backpacking. 

Those trails include:

Hiking Trails w Miles

Rock House 0.5

Vesuvius Lakeshore 8

Vesuvius Backpack 17

Symmes/Morgan Sisters 14

Whiskey Run 1.0

Lake Vesuvius Boardwalk 0.32

Ranger’s Office Connector 1

Archery Trail 0.8

A free detailed hiking trail map is available from any 

Forest office. The two trail systems covered on this 

card are part of the Lake Vesuvius Recreation Area. 

The map below shows the location of the recreation 

area.

United States Department of Agriculture

Forest

Service FS-R9-029

03/2015

In addition to these trails, cross-country hiking is allowed, though we suggest you purchase a topographic 

map of the area to prevent trespassing on private land. 

No permits are required for hiking. Come enjoy America’s Great Outdoors on the Wayne National Forest (NF)!

Lake Vesuvius Boardwalk

Length: 0.32 mile connecting the boat ramp and dam. 

Type: Accessible trail of level cement and wood. 

Special Features: The boardwalk features safety hand 

and toe rails, several widened places for resting, accessible fishing rail areas and a shaded fishing pier. The 

fishing pier is also a great observation site, bring your 

binoculars and enjoy your visit. 

Rock House Trail

Length: 0.4 mile

Type: Paved and native surface.

Special Features: This trail accesses rock overhangs 

and follows a cliff face featuring the power of erosion 

and the geologic wonder of the great rock houses. The 

Rock House Trail includes benches, interpretive signage and a boardwalk. 

Caution: Do not disturb or deface the rock shelters or 

any other historical or archaeological sites. 

For more information:

Ironton Ranger District

6518 State Route 93

Pedro, OH 45659

Visit our website at: www.fs.usda.gov/wayne 

Office hours: M-Fri. 8 - 4:30

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
§ 113.11 Bond application. ( a ) *Single transaction bond application.* In order to insure that the revenue is adequately protected, the port director may require a person who will be engaged in a single customs transaction relating to the importation or entry of merchandise to file a bond application. The single transaction bond application may be in the form of a letter filed with the Director, Revenue Division or the port director, or the application may be scanned and submitted to CBP as an email attachment or by fax. The application must identify the value and nature of the merchandise involved in the transaction to be secured. When the proper bond in a sufficient amount is filed with the entry summary or with the entry, or when the entry summary is filed at the time of entry, an application will not be required.
( b ) *Continuous bond application.* To secure multiple transactions relating to the importation or entry of merchandise or the operation of a bonded smelting or refining warehouse, a continuous bond application must be submitted to the Director, Revenue Division. The continuous bond application may be in the form of a letter or it may be scanned and submitted to CBP as an email attachment or by facsimile (fax). ( 1 ) *Information required.* The application must contain the following information: ( i ) The general character of the merchandise to be entered; and
( ii ) The total amount of ordinary customs duties (including any taxes required by law to be treated as duties), plus the estimated amount of any other tax or taxes on the merchandise to be collected by CBP, accruing on all merchandise imported by the principal during the calendar year preceding the date of the application. The total amount of duties and taxes will be that which would have been required to be deposited had the merchandise been entered for consumption even though some or all of the merchandise may have been entered under bond. If the value or nature of the merchandise to be imported will change in any material respect during the next year the change must be identified. If no imports were made during the calendar year prior to the application, a statement of the duties and taxes it is estimated will accrue on all importations during the current year shall be submitted.
( 2 ) *Application updates.* If the Director, Revenue Division approves a bond based upon the application, whenever there is a significant change in the information provided under this paragraph, the principal on the bond must submit a new application containing an update of the information required by paragraph (b)(1) of this section. The new application must be filed no later than 30 days after the new facts become known to the principal.
( c ) *Certification.* Any application submitted under this section must be signed by the applicant and contain the following certification:
I certify that the factual information contained in this application is true and accurate and any information provided which is based upon estimates is based upon the best information available on the date of this application.
[CBP Dec. 15-15, 80 FR 70163, Nov. 13, 2015]
### §137c. Withdrawal of books from Library of Congress

The chief judge and associate judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and the chief judge and associate judges of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia are authorized to use and take books from the Library of Congress in the same manner and subject to the same regulations as justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.

(Joint Res. No. 9, Jan. 27, 1894, 28 Stat. 577; June 7, 1934, ch. 426, 48 Stat. 926; June 25, 1936, ch. 804, 49 Stat. 1921; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §32(a), (b), 62 Stat. 991; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §127, 63 Stat. 107.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, as amended by act May 24, 1949, substituted "United States District Court for the District of Columbia" for "District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia", "chief judge" for "chief justice" and "associate judges" for "associate justices" wherever appearing.

Act June 25, 1936, substituted "District Court of the United States for the said District" for "Supreme Court for the said District".

Act June 7, 1934, substituted "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia" for "Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia".
#### § 68.12 Relief.

The final determination may be appealed by the appellant(s) to the United States district court as provided in section 1363(f) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 4104).
1

Ngo, Dan (FAA)

From: Ngo, Dan (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 5:36 PM

To: 'admin@nexusuas.com'

Subject: Request for Information - FAA-2015-3385

Dear Mr. Patterson: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-3385). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by 

Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and 

remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the 

requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your 

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by 12/16/2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

Dan Ngo 

Office of Rulemaking, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division 

Federal Aviation Administration 

202.267.4264
1 

### Russell, Sherry

From: Stewart, Michael

Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:09 PM

To: Russell, Sherry

Subject: FW: Integrated Review Plan for the SO2 NAAQS

Please docket. Thanks!

Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541

‐ 7524

stewart.michael@epa.gov

From: Stewart, Michael

Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:08 PM

To: 'Roger Caiazza'

Subject: RE: Integrated Review Plan for the SO2 NAAQS

Thank you for your comment. I will share with the appropriate folks here and enter it into the rulemaking docket.

Thanks again,

Mike

Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541

‐ 7524

stewart.michael@epa.gov

From: Roger Caiazza [ mailto:roger.caiazza@gmail.com ]

Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 9:40 AM

To: Stewart, Michael

Subject: Integrated Review Plan for the SO2 NAAQS

Dr. Stewart,

I missed the opportunity to comment on the draft Integrated Review Plan for the Primary National Ambient Air Quality

Standard for Sulfur Dioxide and wanted to let you know my concern with these standards and the air quality benefit

assessments. Given the large cost benefit projections for relatively small future concentration decreases, I am at a loss

why EPA has not been able to produce verification studies showing what I would assume to be even larger benefits of2 the health impact improvements for the much larger ambient pollutant level decreases observed over the last 25

years. Therefore, my comment would have been to please do that data analysis in the upcoming review.

Thank you,

Roger Caiazza

7679 Bay Cir

Liverpool, NY 13090
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-47 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, April 2, 1998)

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET APRIL 21-23 IN ROCKVILLE, MD

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste

(ACNW) will hold its 100th meeting April 21-23 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day in

Room T-2B3 of One White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville.

Although meetings of the ACNW are open, they are not part of the NRC's public

hearing process. The ACNW was established in 1988 to advise the Commission on all

aspects of nuclear waste management. While anyone may attend the meeting, the

committee will consider only oral or written statements, arranged in advance and limited

to specific matters set forth in a Notice of Meeting to be published in an upcoming issue

of the Federal Register.

ACNW members will meet with members of the NRC staff to discuss guidance

being prepared for the committee’s review of the Department of Energy’s Yucca

Mountain Viability Assessment; hear comments from representatives of the Nuclear

Energy Institute on the Yucca Mountain project; meet with NRC’s Executive Director for

Operations and the Director, Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material

Safety and Safeguards to discuss items of mutual interest; review proposed guidance

for implementing the final rule on radiological criteria for license termination; discuss

NRC’s waste-related research program and nuclear waste-related rulemaking; and

discuss proposed reports, topics for future consideration and miscellaneous matters.

Further information regarding topics to be discussed, whether the meeting has

been canceled or rescheduled, the Chairman’s ruling on requests for an opportunity to

present oral statements and the time allotted for them can be obtained by contacting

Richard K. Major, Chief, Nuclear Waste Branch at (301) 415-7366.

#
(NOTE TO EDITORS: The use of self-contained tape recorders in the meeting

room is permitted during open portions of the meeting when a transcript is being kept.

The use of still, motion picture and television cameras - the physical installation and

presence of which will not interfere with the course of the meeting - will be permitted

both before and after the meeting, during any recess, and, at the discretion of the

committee chairman, while the meeting is in session.)
§ 115.9 Certifying Authorities responsibilities—containers. ( a ) *General.* Containers may be approved for transport under seal by design type at the manufacturing stage or, otherwise, at a stage subsequent to manufacture.
( b ) *Design type approval.* The Certifying Authority to whom a container is submitted for design type approval shall examine the drawings and detailed design specifications submitted with the application for approval. The Certifying Authority shall advise the applicant of any changes that must be made to the proposed design type so that approval may be granted. The Certifying Authority shall examine one or more containers to confirm that such containers comply with the technical requirements of part 1, Annex 7, TIR Convention, 1975, and Annex 4 of the Customs Convention on Containers, 1972. The Certifying Authority shall issue a certificate authorizing the applicant to affix an approval plate, as described in appendix 1 to part II, Annex 7 of the TIR Convention, 1975, and Annex 5 of the Customs Convention on Containers, 1972, for all containers manufactured in conformity with the specifications of the type of container approved. This certificate shall comply with the model certificate in appendix 2, part II, Annex 7 of the TIR Convention, 1975, and appendix 2 of Annex 5 of the Customs Convention on Containers, 1972.
( c ) *After manufacture.* The Certifying Authority to whom containers are submitted for approval after manufacture, shall examine as many containers as necessary to ascertain that they comply with the technical conditions prescribed in part 1, Annex 7, TIR Convention, 1975, and Annex 5 of the Customs Convention on Containers, 1972. The Certifying Authority shall issue a certificate of approval authorizing the applicant to affix an approval plate to the specific number or series of containers being approved. The certificate shall comply with the model certificate of approval in appendix 3, Part II, Annex 7, TIR Convention, 1975, and appendix 3, Annex 5, Customs Convention on Containers, 1972.
( d ) *Supplementary examinations.* If a container approved by design type is the subject of an extended production run or several production runs under one certificate of approval, the Certifying Authority shall confirm by examination of one or more containers during the manufacturing process, or by other means, that such containers continue to meet the approved drawings and detailed design specifications and the technical requirements of Annex 7 of the TIR Convention, 1975, and Annex 4 of the Customs Convention on Containers, 1972. For the purposes of this section, an extended production run shall be considered as a continuous run of many units over long periods of time, as well as a new run following completion of a previous run.
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.620 General.

Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, all criminal, civil, or administrative penalties which may be imposed on U.S. importers, exporters, and producers for violations of the customs and related laws and regulations will also apply to U.S. importers, exporters, and producers for violations of the laws and regulations relating to the CAFTA-DR.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. (S)1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diametrics Medical, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
B. Kaysen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                         /s/ David B. Kaysen
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         David B. Kaysen
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         August 14, 2003
#### Julia M. C. Lawrence v. Charles E. Littlefield and Others.

Motion granted; question certified. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.