alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

No. III-00-32 June 23, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING JUNE 28 IN OAK HARBOR, OHIO,

TO DESCRIBE LATEST ASSESSMENT OF DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting Wednesday, June 28, in

Oak Harbor, Ohio, to discuss the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant’s latest performance review results.

The plant is operated by FirstEnergy Corporation.

The meeting will be held at 1 p.m. EDT at the plant’s Energy Education Center, 5501 North

State, Route 2, Oak Harbor, Ohio.

The Plant Performance Reviews (PPRs) are an interim measure the NRC has used to assess

nuclear power plant safety while a revised reactor oversight process was being developed. The primary

purpose of the PPRs is to evaluate safety performance information and identify any changes in plant

performance so the NRC can allocate inspection resources appropriately. The text of each PPR letter,

including the one on Davis-Besse, is available from the NRC Office of Public Affairs and has been

posted at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr on the NRC web site.

Current performance information for the plants is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html

A plain language summary of the new reactor oversight process is available from the NRC

Office of Public Affairs or on the web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm

# #
#### Abraham Schultz et al., Respondents, v. Morris Simon, Appellant.

With the landlords (respondents) living in the multiple dwelling, section 83 of the Multiple Dwelling Law does not require that a janitor or superintendent shall live in the premises; and without such requirement a tenant may not be removed from possession to afford living accommodations for an employee of the landlord. *(Lisella*v. *Marrano,*273 App. Div. 405.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-121 August 7, 2000

NRC SCHEDULES MEETINGS IN NEVADA AND MARYLAND

ON SAFETY OF SPENT FUEL SHIPPING CASKS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled meetings to obtain further public input into

its proposed update of a 1987 study that examined the adequacy of spent nuclear fuel transportation

casks to withstand severe accidents. The meetings will be held August 15-16 in Las Vegas and

Pahrump, Nevada, and on September 13 at NRC’s headquarters in Rockville, Maryland.

The NRC is reexamining the safety of spent fuel shipping containers because of several factors,

including the possible increase in shipments in a few years if a high-level radioactive waste repository

at Yucca Mountain begins operating. The reassessment will also enable the staff to focus more closely

on those licensing issues most important to safety.

At meetings held last year, the staff obtained public input on the types of issues to be

considered in a spent fuel package performance study. The staff is now prepared to present an issues

paper on such a study incorporating comments received at those meetings. The staff will also discuss a

technical report and brochure on risk assessment entitled, “Reexamination of Spent Fuel Shipment

Risk Estimates” (NUREG/CR-6672). Interested persons are invited to comment on the issues paper

and a draft version of the brochure, copies of which are available on the web

at:http://ttd.sandia.gov/nrc/modal.htm

Comments on both documents should be submitted by September 29 to Robert Lewis, Spent

Fuel Project Office, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 20555-0001, or by

telephone at 301-415-8527.

The meetings will be held in two differing formats: workshops and general public meetings.

At the workshops during the day on August 15 and September 13, invited persons with a broad

spectrum of views representing citizen and environmental groups, nuclear and transportation industry,

state, tribal and local governments, and others, will convene to discuss their views on the issues.

Members of the public are welcome to attend and comment at these workshops. The general public

meetings will be held in the evenings on August 15-16, at which NRC staff will briefly describe the

agency’s role in ensuring transportation safety and discuss the studies and related concerns.

The time and location of the workshops and meetings are as follows:
ˇ August 15 workshop in Las Vegas, in the Hawaiian Room of the Tropicana Hotel, at 3801 Las

Vegas Boulevard, from 9:30 a.m. - 3:30 p.m;

ˇ August 15 meeting in Las Vegas, same location, from 7:00 - 9:00 p.m;

ˇ August 16 meeting in Pahrump, at the Mountain View Casino & Bowl, at 1750 Pahrump Valley

Blvd, from 7:00 - 9:00 p.m;

ˇ September 13 workshop in Rockville, Maryland, in the auditorium at NRC’s Two White Flint

North Building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, from 9:30 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.

##
###### Editorial Note on Part 126

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 126.805 What are the procedures for appeals of HUBZone status protest determinations?

The protested concern, the protester, or the contracting officer may file an appeal of a HUBZone status protest determination with SBA's Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) in accordance with part 134 of this chapter.

[88 FR 21089, Apr. 10, 2023]
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-51116, 33-39557, 33-39556, 333-17843)pertaining to the Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, the Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Officer Bonus Program, the Amended, Restated and Substituted Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Stock Plan, and the Kaiser Ventures Inc. 1995Stock Plan, as amended, respectively, of our report dated January 22, 2002, (except for Note 2 – *Environmental Insurance and Environmental Remediation Liabilities*, Notes 3, 9, 12, Note 20 – *Environmental Contingencies* andNote 22, as to which the date is November 12, 2004), with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Kaiser Ventures LLC and Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

 

 

Orange County, California

December 1, 2004
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

For additional information, see related documents published at 47 FR 57369, Dec. 23, 1982; 48 FR 17101, Apr. 21, 1983; and 48 FR 29096, June 24, 1983.

#### § 4.2 What definitions apply to these regulations?

*Administrator* means the Administrator of FEMA or an official or employee of FEMA acting for the Administrator of FEMA under a delegation of authority.

*FEMA* means the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

*Order* means Executive Order 12372, issued July 14, 1982, and amended April 8, 1983 and titled “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs.”

*State* means any of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands, or the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.

[48 FR 29316, June 24, 1983, as amended at 74 FR 15332, Apr. 3, 2009]
§ 60.5 Flood plain management criteria for flood-related erosion-prone areas. The Federal Insurance Administrator will provide the data upon which flood plain management regulations for flood-related erosion-prone areas shall be based. If the Federal Insurance Administrator has not provided sufficient data to furnish a basis for these regulations in a particular community, the community shall obtain, review, and reasonably utilize data available from other Federal, State or other sources, pending receipt of data from the Federal Insurance Administrator. However, when special flood-related erosion hazard area designations have been furnished by the Federal Insurance Administrator they shall apply. The symbols defining such special flood-related erosion hazard designations are set forth in § 64.3 of this subchapter. In all cases the minimum requirements governing the adequacy of the flood plain management regulations for flood-related erosion-prone areas adopted by a particular community depend on the amount of technical data provided to the community by the Federal Insurance Administrator. Minimum standards for communities are as follows: ( a ) When the Federal Insurance Administrator has not yet identified any area within the community as having special flood-related erosion hazards, but the community has indicated the presence of such hazards by submitting an application to participate in the Program, the community shall ( 1 ) Require the issuance of a permit for all proposed construction, or other development in the area of flood-related erosion hazard, as it is known to the community;
( 2 ) Require review of each permit application to determine whether the proposed site alterations and improvements will be reasonably safe from flood-related erosion and will not cause flood-related erosion hazards or otherwise aggravate the existing flood-related erosion hazard; and
( 3 ) If a proposed improvement is found to be in the path of flood-related erosion or to increase the erosion hazard, require the improvement to be relocated or adequate protective measures to be taken which will not aggravate the existing erosion hazard.
( b ) When the Federal Insurance Administrator has delineated Zone E on the community's FIRM, the community shall ( 1 ) Meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) Require a setback for all new development from the ocean, lake, bay, riverfront or other body of water, to create a safety buffer consisting of a natural vegetative or contour strip. This buffer will be designated by the Federal Insurance Administrator according to the flood-related erosion hazard and erosion rate, in conjunction with the anticipated “useful life” of structures, and depending upon the geologic, hydrologic, topographic and climatic characteristics of the community's land. The buffer may be used for suitable open space purposes, such as for agricultural, forestry, outdoor recreation and wildlife habitat areas, and for other activities using temporary and portable structures only.
[41 FR 46975, Oct. 26, 1976. Redesignated at 44 FR 31177, May 31, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 44552, Sept. 29, 1983; 49 FR 4751, Feb. 8, 1984]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Morris K. Udall Scholarship and Excellence in National Environmental Policy Foundation

# Time and Date:

9 a.m. to 12 p.m., Friday, November 12, 2004.

# Place:

 The offices of the Morris K. Udall Scholarship and Excellence in National Environmental Policy Foundation, 130 South Scott Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85701.

# Status:

 This meeting will be open to the public, unless it is necessary for the Board to consider items in executive session.

# Matters to be Considered:

(1) A report on the U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution; (2) A report from the Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy; (3) A report on the Native Nations Institute; (4) Program Reports; and (5) A Report from the Management Committee.

# Portions Open to the Public:

 All sessions with the exception of the session listed below.

# Portions Closed to the Public:

Executive session.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Christopher L. Helms, Executive Director, 130 South Scott Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 670-5529.

Dated: October 15, 2004.

Christopher L. Helms,

Executive Director, Morris K. Udall Scholarship and Excellence in National Environmental Policy Foundation, and Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-23609 Filed 10-18-04; 2:49 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-FN-M
§ 122.163 Transit air cargo traveling to U.S. ports. ( a ) *Application.* If transit air cargo is traveling from the port of arrival to another U.S. port under § 122.119, a liability shall be assessed, as set out in § 18.8 of this chapter if there has been: ( 1 ) Shortage in delivery;
( 2 ) Irregular delivery; or
( 3 ) Non-delivery.
( b ) *Liabilities assessed.* The liabilities assessed under this section are imposed as liquidated damages under a carrier's bond.
( c ) *Value of merchandise.* The port director shall determine the value of merchandise for assessment purposes based on the following factors: ( 1 ) Any data or documents available to the airline which presented a receipt for the transit air cargo, and available to the importing airline relating to the description and value of the cargo; and
( 2 ) Other information available to the port director relating to the same or similar merchandise. If the data or documents required by this section are not submitted within 90 days of the date requested, the port director shall determine value on the basis of other available information. The transit air cargo manifest does not reflect value.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Thomas F. O’Connor, Relator, v. Douglas I. McKay, as Police Commissioner, etc., Respondent.

Writ dismissed and proceedings affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-144 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, October 17, 1996)

NOTE TO EDITORS -- ACRS MEETING RESCHEDULED

A meeting of two subcommittees of the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission's Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has

been rescheduled due to the need for additional information from

the NRC staff.

The ACRS subcommittees on Materials and Metallurgy and

Severe Accidents, originally scheduled for October 22, will be

held instead on November 5, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and

November 6, from 8:30 a.m. to noon. The meetings will take place

in Room 2B3, Two White Flint North, at 11545 Rockville Pike.

All other aspects of the meeting, at which steam generator

tube integrity issues will be discussed, remain the same. They

were first detailed in a Notice of Meeting published in the

October 9 edition of the Federal Register.

#
# -**vIIC~/iVlO** 18:59 FAX 2024935142 

### FAA -+ DMS**~OOl/001** 

# '" ." FLYING SERVICE 

## DCCl<ETS Ll**"~'** : ,.' .,. ,"""'(' 

# ,

··fl.

I " " ; .' .1, .**~.** ' November 20,2009

Federal 

### Aviation Administration .I\

### TTN: Hearip£ Docket ('It'rk. A(;( '.4,0 Wilbur Wrigh! Building
- 

### Suile 2Wl000 

### 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D. 

### C. 2051::11 Re: EIR 

### No. 2009SWIIOOl I To Whom Tl 

### May Concern; 

### Central Flying Service, 

### Inc. requesrs a Hearing on the referenced matter in 

### accol'dancc with 14 C.F.R. 13.16. 

### CENTRAL FLYING 

### SERVICE,INC.

# ~~ Richard N. Holben' President

- , 

### .. " 

### .
'501 Bond Street .. Uttle Rock, Arkansas 72202 • 501·375-3245 • Fax 501-375-7274
### §1966. Protection of Members of Congress, officers of Congress, and members of their families

#### (a) Authority of the Capitol Police

Subject to the direction of the Capitol Police Board, the United States Capitol Police is authorized to protect, in any area of the United States, the person of any Member of Congress, officer of the Congress, as defined in section 4101(b) of this title, and any member of the immediate family of any such Member or officer, if the Capitol Police Board determines such protection to be necessary.

#### (b) Detail of police

In carrying out its authority under this section, the Capitol Police Board, or its designee, is authorized, in accordance with regulations issued by the Board pursuant to this section, to detail, on a case-by-case basis, members of the United States Capitol Police to provide such protection as the Board may determine necessary under this section.

#### (c) Arrest of suspects

In the performance of their protective duties under this section, members of the United States Capitol Police are authorized (1) to make arrests without warrant for any offense against the United States committed in their presence, or for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United States if they have reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing such felony; and (2) to utilize equipment and property of the Capitol Police.

#### (d) Fines and penalties

Whoever knowingly and willfully obstructs, resists, or interferes with a member of the Capitol Police engaged in the performance of the protective functions authorized by this section, shall be fined not more than $300 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

#### (e) Construction of provisions

Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to imply that the authority, duty, and function conferred on the Capitol Police Board and the United States Capitol Police are in lieu of or intended to supersede any authority, duty, or function imposed on any Federal department, agency, bureau, or other entity, or the Metropolitan Police of the District of Columbia, involving the protection of any such Member, officer, or family member.

#### (f) "United States" defined

As used in this section, the term "United States" means each of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, and territories and possessions of the United States.

(July 31, 1946, ch. 707, §9A, as added Pub. L. 97–143, §1(a), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1723.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 212a–2 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-38 June 6, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE AT R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of the R.E. Ginna nuclear

power plant on Thursday, June 8, to discuss the results of the agency’s latest Plant Performance

Review for the facility. The plant, which is located near Rochester, N.Y., is operated by Rochester

Gas & Electric Corporation.

Issuance of the reviews was announced in NRC news release 00-059 on April 5. The Plant

Performance Review letter for the Ginna facility can be found on the agency’s web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr/.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, will be held at 2 p.m. at the

plant’s Training Center, 1503 Lake Road, Ontario, N.Y. At its conclusion, NRC staff will be available

to answer questions from interested observers and to meet with state and local officials.

#
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40750 Summary Calendar

SHEET METAL WORKERS’ INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 337; J.C. HART, III

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

TYLER, CITY OF TEXAS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (6:96-CV-350)

April 17, 1997 Before JOHNSON, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Sheet Metal Workers’ International Association (union) and

J.C. Hart, III appeal a judgment en tered in favor of the City of

Tyler, Texas, after a bench trial. The district court’s findings

of fact were not clearly erroneous. See Seal v. Knorpp , 957 F.2d

1230, 1234 (5th Cir. 1992). Furthermore, the district court did

not err in concluding that the City’s no smoking ordinance is not

preempted by the National Labor Relations Act. S ee M etropolitan2

Life Ins. Co. v. Massachusetts , 471 U.S. 724, 753-55 (1985). The

district court also did not err in concluding that the ordinance

does not violate the Contracts Clause or the Due Process Clause of

the United States Constitution. S ee Keystone Bitmus Coal Ass’n v.

DeBenedictis , 480 U.S. 470, 502-03 (1987); Energy Reserves Group,

Inc. v. Kansas Po wer and Light Co. , 459 U.S. 400, 411-12 (1983);

Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus
, 438 U.S. 234, 241-42

(1978); FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of Austin

, 93 F.3d 167,

175 (5th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED.
### SUBCHAPTER I—ELIMINATION OF DEFICITS IN EXCESS OF MAXIMUM DEFICIT AMOUNT
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.138 Proof of use.

Within 3 years from the date of entry or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, the importer shall submit in duplicate in support of his claim for free entry or for a reduced rate of duty a certificate executed by (1) the superintendent or manager of the manufacturing plant, or (2) the individual end-user or other person having knowledge of the actual use of the imported article. The certificate shall include a description of the processing in sufficient detail to show that the use contemplated by the law has actually taken place. A blanket certificate covering all purchases of a given type of merchandise from a particular importer during a given period, or all such purchases with specified exceptions, may be accepted for this purpose, provided the importer shall furnish a statement showing in detail, in such manner as to be readily identified with each entry, the merchandise which he sold to such manufacturer or end-user during such period.

[T.D. 71-139, 36 FR 10727, June 2, 1971]