alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #3639]
 As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on October 7, 2004, I find that Dodge, Faribault, Freeborn, Mower, and Steele Counties in the State of Minnesota constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and flooding occurring on September 14, 2004, and continuing. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on December 6, 2004 and for economic injury until the close of business on July 7, 2005 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308. In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in the following contiguous counties may be filed until the specified date at the above location: Blue Earth, Fillmore, Goodhue, Martin, Olmstead, Rice, and Waseca in the State of Minnesota; and Howard, Kossuth, Mitchell, Winnebago, and Worth Counties in the State of Iowa. Dodge, Faribault, Freeborn, Mower, and Steele Counties in the State of Minnesota are also eligible under Public Assistance and our disaster loan program is available for private non-profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature in those counties. The interest rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners with credit available elsewhere,
6.375Homeowners without credit available elsewhere,
3.187Businesses with credit available elsewhere,
5.800Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere,
2.900Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere,
4.875For Economic Injury:Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere,
2.900
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 363906. For economic injury the number is 9AE800 for Minnesota; and 9AE900 for Iowa. The Public Assistance number assigned to Minnesota is P06606. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) Dated: October 12, 2004. Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 04-23275 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
§ 12.61 Fur-seal or sea-otter skins permitted entry. ( a ) Fur-seal or sea-otter skins taken by Indians, Aleuts, or other aborigines under the authority of section 3 of the act, fur-seal skins taken under the authority of the Canadian Government, and fur-seal skins taken on the Pribilof Islands and other specified areas under the authority of section 4 of the act shall be admitted to entry if officially marked and certified as having been lawfully taken and if accompanied by a declaration of the shipper identifying the skins by marks and numbers as those covered by the official certificate.
( b ) Fur-seal or sea-otter skins taken in waters or on land not specified in the act or in the fur-seal agreement with Canada or other fur-seal agreement shall be admitted to entry upon the production of evidence satisfactory to the port director that they have been so taken.
[28 FR 14710, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51253, Dec. 21, 1988]
§ 350.15 Appeal procedures. ( a ) Any interested person may appeal a decision made under §§ 350.12 and 350.13 of this part, by submitting to the Administrator, FEMA, a written notice of appeal, within 30 days after the appearance in the Federal Register, of the notice of decision relating to the matter being appealed. The appeal must be addressed to the Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC, 20472. The appeal letter shall state specific reasons for the appeal and include an offer to provide documentation supporting appellate arguments.
( b ) Upon receipt of an appeal, the Administrator or the Administrator's designee shall review the file, as submitted to the Deputy Administrator for the National Preparedness Directorate, by the Regional Administrator of the FEMA Region concerned, based on the information contained in the file and the appeal letter, with supporting documentation. The Administrator or the Administrator's designee shall decide whether or not the Associate Director's initial decision was supported by substantial evidence in the file and is consistent with FEMA policy.
( c ) The decision of the Administrator or the Administrator's designee shall be published in the Federal Register as the final agency decision on the matter and shall not be reviewable within FEMA, except upon a showing that it was procured by fraud or misrepresentation. In addition to publication in the Federal Register, copies of the decision shall be forwarded to the appellant, the Governor(s) of the State(s) affected, the NRC and the affected licensee of the involved power facility.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 0:20-cv-61241-RUIZ

APRIL HICKS,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

STATUS REPORT

Defendant, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United 

States Attorney, hereby provides the Court with a Status Report on the issues remaining to be tried. 

1. On February 1, 2022, this Court entered its Order Adopting Findings of Fact and 

Conclusions of Law after conclusion of the trial in the above-captioned matter [D.E. 96]. 

2. On February 4, 2022, and again on February 8, 2022, Defendant circulated a 

proposed stipulated final judgment on Defendant’s Counterclaim stating Defendant shall recover 

from Plaintiff the total sum of $4,745.13, consisting of the repairs performed on the Postal Service 

truck post-accident, and as supported by Defendant’s Exhibit No. 3 which was admitted into 

evidence without objection at the trial on January 24, 2022. 

3. As of the date of this filing, no response from Plaintiff has been received, even after 

a telephone call to Plaintiff’s counsel’s office early in the day on February 11, 2022.

4. Therefore, since it appears a trial on damages may be necessary, Defendant requests 

a special-set trial date for damages to be determined by the Court.

Case 0:20-cv-61241-RAR Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/11/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

5. Trial counsel for Defendant are in a two-week trial before Judge Marra starting on 

February 14, 2022, but should be available after Monday, March 7, 2022. 

6. Defendant has no opposition to a trial by Zoom on this limited issue. Defendant 

does not anticipate trial taking more than 30 minutes to 1 hour, at most.

WHEREFORE, Defendant United States of America requests this Court schedule a trial 

on damages, and preferably to be conducted by remote means, and for any such other relief it 

deems just and proper.

Dated: February 11, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: Monica L. Haddad

Monica L. Haddad 

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Florida Bar No. 99426

Email: Monica.Haddad@usdoj.gov

U.S. Attorney’s Office

Southern District of Florida

500 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Telephone: (561) 209-1004

Attorney for Defendant, United States of America

Case 0:20-cv-61241-RAR Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/11/2022 Page 2 of 2
## Gr anular Ba yluscide Tre at men ts • TFM is used in lotic conditions – pumps used to deliver lampricide to flowing w ater that carries “bank” downs tr eam • Gr anular Ba yluscide is used in len tic ar eas – lampricide spr aye d ov er infes te d ar ea, sinks to bottom, and dissolves • Larv ae infes t some len tic ar eas during periods of high discharge ( lentics associat ed with s tr eams) • Largest lentic ar eas ar e inter connecting w ater wa ys (St. Mary s, St. Clair river s) 1

## Assessmen t of Len tic Ar eas • Len tic ar eas ar e assessed with 500 m2 plots or deep w ate r electr ofisher • Larv ae c ollect ed with scap nets for one hour • Pr ovides lar va l siz e s tructur e and dis tribution • Habit at defined with dr edge or RoxAnn TM 

### • Habit at maps help define lar va l dis tribution 2

## Depth of gr anular Ba yluscide

Tr ea tmen ts • Mos t len tic tr ea tmen ts occur along or ov er dr op - of fsr anging fr om 2 - 30 feet • Tr ea tmen ts ar e commonly conduct ed in the St. Mary s Riv er at depths ra nging up t o 60 feet • Use of gr anular Ba yluscide is though t to be inef fe ctiv e a t depths gr ea te r than 90 feet 3

## Pr eliminar y Da ta • Delineat e ar ea with GPS coor dinat es – (buoy s or computer pr ogram) 

### • Surv ey ar ea for non - ta rg ets • Surv ey ar ea for weeds and obs tructions • Measur e DO and t emper atur e 4

## Tr ea tmen t of Len tic Ar eas

5 

### • Fill hopper with gr anular Ba yluscide • Apply with spr eader or spr ay er • Surv ey ar ea for non - ta rg ets and larv ae0 4 4 6 3 11 12 17 2 0 1 8 2 4 11 9

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

**Number of lentic ar eas tr** **eated**

**by country**
US Canada14 16 10 4 4 9 4 9 6 9 6 3 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

0-5 5.01-10 10.01-20 20.01-30 30.01-40 40 **Number of gr anular Ba**  **yluscide lentic tr** **eatments by ar ea (acr** **es)**
US Canada5 13 20 41 76 52

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0-5 5.01-10 10.01-20 20.01-20 30.01-40 40-256 **Number of gr anular Ba**  **yluscide tr** **eatments in St. Marys River by**

**ar ea (acr** **es); 2003 -**  **2011**
Acre range
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

125910 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

COUNTY ROAD ASSOCIATION OF Maura D. Corrigan 

MICHIGAN and CHIPPEWA COUNTY Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, ROAD COMMISSION, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

and 

MICHIGAN PUBLIC TRANSIT ASSOCIATION, 

ANN ARBOR TRANSPORTATION 

AUTHORITY, CAPITAL AREA 

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, and 

SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR 

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, 

Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 125910 

 COA: 245931 

Ingham CC: 02-000308-CZ 

GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, DIRECTOR OF 

THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 

MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET,

DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND 

BUDGET, STATE BUDGET DIRECTOR, 

STATE TREASURER, DEPARTMENT OF 

TREASURY, SECRETARY OF STATE, and 

STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of September 30, 2004, the application for leave to appeal the January 

13, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

County Rd Ass’n of Michigan v Governor (Docket No. 125665). On order of the Court, 

the opinion having been issued on November 8, 2005, 474 Mich 11 (2005), the 

application for leave to appeal is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0123 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 30, 2006 

Clerk
### §§60b, 60c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 60b, acts June 20, 1929, ch. 33, §2, 46 Stat. 38; July 25, 1939, ch. 352, §3, 53 Stat. 1080, which provided that clerk hire should be at rate of $6,500 per annum and limited individual salaries to $3,900 per annum, was superseded by former section 60g of this title.

Section 60c, R.S. §55, related to payment of salaries of chaplains.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin E. Franklin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|/s/ Martin E. Franklin                                             
|Martin E. Franklin Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer May 8, 2008

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ian G.H. Ashken, Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|/s/ Ian G.H. Ashken                                                  
|Ian G.H. Ashken Vice Chairman and Chief Financial
Officer May 8, 2008
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2002 Page 1 of 1
### §65b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 65b was editorially reclassified as section 6613 of this title.
#### § 72.2 Definitions.

Except as otherwise provided in this part, the definitions in 44 CFR part 59 are applicable to this part. For the purposes of this part, the products are defined as follows:

*CLOMA.* A CLOMA is FEMA's comment on a proposed structure or group of structures that would, upon construction, be located on existing natural ground above the base (1-percent-annual-chance) flood elevation on a portion of a legally defined parcel of land that is partially inundated by the base flood.

*CLOMR.* A CLOMR is FEMA's comment on a proposed project that would, upon construction, affect the hydrologic or hydraulic characteristics of a flooding source and thus result in the modification of the existing regulatory floodway, the effective base flood elevations, or the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA).

*CLOMR-F.* A CLOMR-F is FEMA's comment on a proposed project that would, upon construction, result in a modification of the SFHA through the placement of fill outside the existing regulatory floodway.

*LOMR.* A LOMR is FEMA's modification to an effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), or Flood Boundary and Floodway Map (FBFM), or both. LOMRs are generally based on the implementation of physical measures that affect the hydrologic or hydraulic characteristics of a flooding source and thus result in the modification of the existing regulatory floodway, the effective base flood elevations, or the SFHA. The LOMR officially revises the FIRM or FBFM, and sometimes the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report, and, when appropriate, includes a description of the modifications. The LOMR is generally accompanied by an annotated copy of the affected portions of the FIRM, FBFM, or FIS report.

*LOMR-F.* A LOMR-F is FEMA's modification of the SFHA shown on the FIRM based on the placement of fill outside the existing regulatory floodway.

*PMR.* A PMR is FEMA's physical revision and republication of an effective FIRM, FBFM, or FIS report. PMRs are generally based on physical measures that affect the hydrologic or hydraulic characteristics of a flooding source and thus result in the modification of the existing regulatory floodway, the effective base flood elevations, or the SFHA.

[62 FR 5737, Feb. 6, 1997]
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Brive-La-Gaillarde by order of that court of 9 September 2005 in Estager SA v Receveur Principal de la Recette des Douanes de Brive

(Case C-359/05)

(2005/C 315/19)

Language of the case: French

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Tribunal de Grande Instance (Regional Court) of Brive-La-Gaillarde of 9 September 2005, received at the Court Registry on 26 September 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Estager SA and Receveur Principal de la Recette des Douanes de Brive (Principal Collector of Customs Revenue of Brive) on the following question:

Are the provisions of Order No 2000-916 of 19 September 2000, adapting the value to euros of certain amounts expressed in francs in the legislation, that concern the conversion of the BAPSA tax applied to the production of flour, meal and groats of common wheat, from FRF 100 francs to EUR 16 in conformity with the Community regulations in relation to the introduction of the euro?

----
age 19°30" 20° 20°30" ze

42°30)
SERBIA

MONTENEGRO

2°30"

Unemplo yementTM

by districts

KOSOVO

2°

1°30" MACEDONIA
41°30

Adriatic Sea

1°
a1

40°30"

0°30" %

Legend

Percentage of unemployed
7.7 - 10.9%

11.6- 12.7%

GM 13.4 - 14.0%

BM 1s.4- 17.4%

HM 1s.2- 21.2%
\.

30 16 ) 30 Kilometers
ee

Source: Statistical Institute, 2005
* Number of unemployed over the active population (15 - 64 years of age) in percentage

19° 19930"
1 4 n n n

lonian

GREECE
Sea

*=.USAID | ALBANIA

od

Produced by GIS Unit, March 2007
464 P.2d 559

#### STATE of New Mexico, ex rel. NEW MEXICO STATE RACING COMMISSION and Henry Zarges, Henderson Van Zandt and John Phillips, three of its racing stewards, Petitioners, v. Honorable Samuel Z. MONTOYA, District Judge, Respondent.

No. 8999.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Jan. 26, 1970.

MOISE, Chief Justice, and COMPTON, TACKETT, WATSON and SISK, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that petition for writ of prohibition be and the same is hereby denied
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-106 August 15, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $55,000 FINE

FOR ALLEGED VIOLATIONS AT GINNA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has cited Rochester

Gas and Electric Company for two alleged violations of NRC

security requirements at the R.E. Ginna nuclear plant near

Rochester, N.Y. The staff has proposed a $55,000 fine.

An NRC inspection was conducted on May 21-30 to review

Ginna’s security program. Based on that inspection and

information gathered at a subsequent predecisional enforcement

conference in the NRC’s Region I office on August 5, the NRC

staff has determined two alleged violations of NRC requirements

occurred, each involving inadequacies in the vehicle barriers

used to prevent the malicious use of a vehicle to gain entry to

the protected and vital areas. The design is intended to prevent

adversaries from transporting personnel and their hand-carried

equipment by vehicle near the vital areas. It is also intended

to preclude the use of a land vehicle bomb.

The first alleged violation is based on the discovery of

three openings in the barrier large enough for a vehicle to get

through. The second alleged violation involved the use of nylon

ties to secure approximately 1200 feet of barrier cables to the

posts. These nylon ties could be removed with hand-held tools,

defeating their ability to withstand a vehicle’s attempt to

penetrate the barrier.

In a letter to RG&E, NRC Region I Administrator Hubert J.

Miller said, “The NRC is particularly concerned that these

conditions were not identified by your staff when the barrier was

designed and installed, nor were they identified by your security

staff during routine tours of the facility.”

Mr. Miller also recognized that the company took prompt and

comprehensive corrective actions, once the alleged violations

were identified, including installing additional barriers in the

areas where openings existed.

The company has 30 days either to pay the proposed fine or to

request in writing that all or part of the penalty be withdrawn.
2#
EXPRESS WORLDWIDE

2021-01-08 MYDHL+ 1.0 / *30-0821* DOX

From : c/o Rodriguez Tramont & Nunez, P.A.

Clerk of Court

Southern District of Florida

400 North Miami Avenue

8th Floor # 8N09

33132-1801 Miami Florida

United States of America

Origin:

TMB

To : CORPORACIÓN HABANOS, S.A.

CORPORACIÓN HABANOS, S.A.

Centro de Negocios Miramar

Edificio Habana, 3ra Planta

Avenida 3ra. entre 78 y 80, C.P.: 11300

10400 HAVANA CITY

Cuba

Contact:

CORPORACIÓN HABANOS, S.A.

. CU-HAV-HAB .

Day Time

Ref: Partagas Pce/Shpt Weight Piece

0.5 lbs 1/1

EEI: NOEEI correspondence

WAYBILL 15 1690 0184

Contents: Letter,

corresp ondence

(2L)CU10400+42000000

(J) JD01 4600 0084 4636 2150

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 62-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2021 Page 1 of 2
Shipment Receipt

Shipment From Shipment To

c/o Rodriguez Tramont & Nunez, P.A.

Clerk of Court

Southern District of Florida

400 North Miami Avenue

8th Floor # 8N09

33132-1801 Miami Florida

United States of America

+13053502300

gw@rtgn-law.com

CORPORACIÓN HABANOS, S.A.

CORPORACIÓN HABANOS, S.A.

Centro de Negocios Miramar

Edificio Habana, 3ra Planta

Avenida 3ra. entre 78 y 80, C.P.: 11300

10400 HAVANA CITY

Cuba

+5378363708

Shipment Details

Shipment Date:

Waybill Number:

Service Type:

Packaging Type:

Number of Pieces:

Total Weight:

Dimensional:

Chargeable:

Insured Amount:

Terms of Trade:

2021-01-11

1516900184

EXPRESS WORLDWIDE

My Own Package

1

0.50lbs

0.63lbs

1.00lbs

Declared Value:

Duties&taxes acct:

Dutiable Status:

Estimated Del date:

Promo Code:

Monday, 25 Jan, 2021

Non-Dutiable

International Information

Billing Information

Payment Type:

Billing Account:

Duties&taxes acct:

Charge Breakdown: 64.68 USD

DHL Account Number

Special Services: Fuel Surcharge/Emergency

Situation

Charge is estimated until DHL reweigh and may not include all fees and surcharges. Shipments paid by credit card: If the final billed amount exceeds the original

pre-authorized amount, you will receive a second charge for the additional amount. Both the original and additional charges will reference the same shipment

number.

Reference Information

Reference:

Pickup reference nr:

Partagas

Description of Contents

Letter, correspondence

2019 © Deutsche Post AG - All rights reserved

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 62-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2021 Page 2 of 2