alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-40 June 14, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING REGARDING INDIAN POINT 2 NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with the public on Monday, June 19, to

discuss several issues associated with the Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant. The NRC is holding the

local meeting to keep interested members of the public informed of developments involving the

facility. It is scheduled to begin at 5:30 p.m. at the plant’s Energy Education Center, at Broadway and

Bleakley Avenue in Buchanan, N.Y.

Indian Point 2 was manually shut down on February 15 following the failure of a tube in a

steam generator. (Steam generators are components that employ thousands of U-shaped tubes to

transfer heat from reactor systems to the power-generating portion of a nuclear power plant.) Plant

safety systems performed as designed during the shutdown.

On June 5, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, the plant’s owner/operator,

submitted the results of steam generator inspections and its proposed basis for restart of the unit

following repairs. NRC staff is currently reviewing that proposal. No decision on the proposal will be

made at the meeting.

At the June 19th meeting, NRC staff will do the following:

ˇ Provide a brief overview of the agency’s overall process for reviewing the performance of

Indian Point 2.

ˇ Discuss the current status of the NRC’s ongoing assessment of steam generator tube integrity

issues.

Following the NRC presentations, the staff will offer the public an opportunity to ask

questions regarding these matters.

#
Issue Date: 12/12/00 - 1 - 00-027

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL IIPB

Change Notice 00-027

DELETED: TRANSMITTED:

Number Date Number Date

1. ---- ---- IP 71841 12/12/00

2. 9900 Tech Guidance 06/29/99 9900 Tech Guidance 12/12/00

OPERATIONS - NOED OPERATIONS - NOED

TRAINING: No special training requirements have been identified for any documents issued

with this change notice.

REMARKS: IP 71841 (Human Performance) is issued for inclusion in IMC 2515, Appendix B.

This inspection procedure will address human performance issues identified under

IP 95002, “Inspection for One Degraded Cornerstone or Any Three White Inputs in

a Strategic Performance Area.”

9900 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE (Operations - Notices of Enforcement Discretion)

has been revised to reflect information received from outside stakeholders and on

staff experience since the last revision. This revision also reflects the current

organization. The major change was to allow a licensee 2-days to submit a written

request for enforcement discretion for LCOs as opposed to the previous 1-day.

DISTRIBUTION: Standard

END
#### § 125.12 Cartage for examination at importers' premises or other place.

Merchandise designated for examination at an importer's premises or other place not in the charge of a Customs officer may be carted, lightered, or carried to any such place by the importer without a cartman's or lighterman's license, when in the judgment of the port director the revenue will not be endangered. Otherwise, such transfer shall be done by a licensed cartman, who shall be the contract cartman whenever practicable.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:20-cv-22646-KMW

DOUG LONGHINI, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SUNSHINE DADE INVESTMENTS LLC, and

DADELAND SERVICE STATIONS, INC.,

Defendant.

___________________________________________/

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

Plaintiff, DOUG LONGHINI, and Defendants, SUNSHINE DADE INVESTMENTS LLC, 

and DADELAND SERVICE STATIONS, INC., hereby advise the Court that the parties have 

reached an agreement in principle to settle the instant case pending execution of a Settlement 

Agreement. The parties will file a Stipulation dismissing this Action with prejudice once the 

settlement agreement is executed, which they reasonably expect to do no later than 45 days from 

the date of this Notice. Accordingly, the Parties, respectfully request that the Court vacate all 

currently set dates and deadlines.

Respectfully submitted this 16th, day of November, 2020. 

/s/ Anthony J. Perez

ANTHONY J. PEREZ

Florida Bar No.: 535451

GARCIA-MENOCAL & PEREZ, P.L.

4937 S.W. 74th Court, Unit #3

Miami, FL 33155

Telephone: (305) 553- 3464

Facsimile: (305)553-3031

Primary Email: ajperez@lawgmp.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Edward S. Polk

EDWARD S. POLK

Florida Bar No.: 239860

MARC RAPAPORT

Florida Bar No.: 1008359

COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A.

Cole, Scott & Kissane Building

9150 South Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 1400

P.O. Box 569015

Miami, Florida 33256

Telephone: (305) 350-5338

Email: edward.polk@scsklegal.com;

Marc.rapaport@csklegal.com

Attorney for Defendant, Sunshine Dade

Case 1:20-cv-22646-KMW Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

/s/ Mendy Halberstam

MENDY HALBERSTAM

Florida Bar No.: 68999

JACKSON LEWIS P.C.

One Biscayne Tower, Suite 3500

Two South Biscayne Boulevard

Miami, FL 33131

Telephone: (305) 577-7600

Facsimile: (305) 373-4466

Primary Email: mendy.halberstam@jacksonlewis.com

Attorney for Defendant, Dadeland Service Stations, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court 

by using the CM/ECF system. I further certify a copy of the foregoing was sent by CM/ECF to 

all counsel of record, this 16th, day of November 2020.

Respectfully submitted,

 GARCIA-MENOCAL & PEREZ, P.L.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

4937 S.W. 74th Court, No. 3

Miami, FL 33155

Telephone: (305) 553-3464

Facsimile: (305) 553-3031

Primary E-Mail: ajperez@gmplaw.com

 Secondary E-Mail: aquezada@lawgmp.com;

bvirues@lawgmp.com; crodriguez@lawgmp.com

By: /s/ Anthony J. Perez____ 

 ANTHONY J. PEREZ

 

 

Case 1:20-cv-22646-KMW Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2020 Page 2 of 2
SCI 001858

CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-161   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 1 of 6

SCI 001859

CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-161   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 2 of 6

SCI 001860

CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-161   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 3 of 6

SCI 001861

CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-161   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 4 of 6

SCI 001862

CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-161   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 5 of 6

SCI 001863

CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-161   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 6 of 6
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-54 July 24, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH CON ED REGARDING INDIAN POINT 2 STEAM GENERATORS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of Consolidated Edison

Company of New York on Friday, July 28, to discuss the company's response to a July 20 NRC letter

to Con Ed regarding steam generators at the Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant.

The meeting, which will begin at 10 a.m., will be held at the Energy Education Center at the

Indian Point 2 site, at Broadway and Bleakley Avenue in Buchanan, N.Y. It will be open to members

of the public for observation only. NRC staff will be available afterwards for questions.

The July 20 letter requests additional information regarding the company's proposed plan to

restart Indian Point 2 with existing steam generators. The NRC staff has concerns regarding the

assumptions and uncertainties in the analysis provided by Con Ed. Without further information, the

NRC is not able to reach a decision regarding the ability of the tubes to maintain their structural

integrity.

A copy of the request for additional information is available at:

www.nrc.gov/NRC/REACTOR/IP/index.html or at www.nrc.gov/OPA/gmo/nrarcv/00-051i.html .

#
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.3034 Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in Colombia. ( a ) *General.* This section sets forth the rules which apply for purposes of obtaining duty-free treatment on goods returned after repair or alteration in Colombia as provided for in subheadings 9802.00.40 and 9802.00.50, HTSUS. Goods returned after having been repaired or altered in Colombia, regardless of whether such repair or alteration could be performed in the territory of the Party from which the good was exported for repair or alteration, are eligible for duty-free treatment, provided that the requirements of this section are met. For purposes of this section, “repairs or alterations” means restoration, addition, renovation, re-dyeing, cleaning, re-sterilizing, or other treatment that does not destroy the essential characteristics of, or create a new or commercially different good from, the good exported from the United States. The term “repairs or alterations” does not include an operation or process that transforms an unfinished good into a finished good.
( b ) *Goods not eligible for duty-free treatment after repair or alteration.* The duty-free treatment referred to in paragraph (a) of this section will not apply to goods which, in their condition as exported from the United States to Colombia, are incomplete for their intended use and for which the processing operation performed in Colombia constitutes an operation that is performed as a matter of course in the preparation or manufacture of finished goods.
( c ) *Documentation.* The provisions of paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of § 10.8, relating to the documentary requirements for goods entered under subheading 9802.00.40 or 9802.00.50, HTSUS, will apply in connection with the entry of goods which are returned from Colombia after having been exported for repairs or alterations and which are claimed to be duty free.
[77 FR 59069, Sept. 26, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 60193, Oct. 1, 2013]
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determin ed that thi s opinio n should not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 41017
JAM ES J. N U N EZ P l a i n ti ff-A p p ell a n t v. CI TYO F TE XA S CI TY , TEX AS D efen da n t
- A pp el l ee

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he Sout her n D i st r i c tof Texas U SD C N o. 3: 08- C V
- 80
B e fo r e J O L L Y , W IE N E R , a n d E L R O D , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l an tJ am es J. N u n ez, a f i ref i gh t er f or D efen da n t
- A pp el l ee C i t y of T exas C i t y, T exas bef ore h e w as f

i red by t h e F i re C h i ef ef fect i ve O ct ober 15, 2 0 0 1 , a p p e a l s t he d i s t r i c tc o ur t ’ s Fi na lJ ud g m e nto f Se p t e m b e r3 , 2 0 0 9, gr ant i ng s um m ar y j udgm entof di sm i ss alw i t h prej udi c e o f N unez’ s c l ai m t hat h i s f i ri n g w as g roun ded in raci ald i scr i m i n ati on . H aving revi ew ed the recor d on a p p ea lin li gh t of th e a p p l i ca b l e law pr ese n ted by the pa rti es in th eir ap p ell a te bri efs as appli ed to th e rel evan tfact s, w e concl u de that t h e di st ri ctcourt United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D May 4, 2010 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk Case: 09-41017 Document: 00511099586 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/04/2010N o. 09- 41017

2 p r o p e r ly g r a n t e d th e C it y ’s m o t io n fo r s u m m a r yju d g m e n t , d is m is s in gN u n e z ’s a ctio n , for th e re a so n s e x h a u stiv e ly a n d co rr e ctly se t for th in th a t co u rt’s M em or andum and O r ders i gned o n Sept em ber3, 2009. AF F I RMED. Case: 09-41017 Document: 00511099586 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/04/2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,149
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,561
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (508)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          61,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                (27,646)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         23,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,355
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,796
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    42
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 832
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,852
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,852
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,852
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.42
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL G. SZMANIA,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

E

- LOAN, INC.; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 36055

D.C. No. 3:16

- cv

- 05644

- RBL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 13, 201 8 **

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Daniel G. Szmania appeals pro se fr om the district court’s judgment

dismissing his diversity action arising from foreclosure proceedings. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Fed eral

R ule of Civ il P rocedure 12(b)(6). Knievel v. ESPN , 393 F.3d 1 068, 1072 (9th Cir.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 23 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 36055

2005). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Szmania’s claim that defendants lacked

authority to foreclose as barred by the doctrine of res judicata because this claim

was raised or could have been raised in a previous acti on between the parties or

their privies that resulted in a final judgment on the merits

. See Holcombe v.

Hosmer , 477 F.3d 1094, 1097 (9th Cir. 2007) (federal courts apply state law

regarding the res judicata effect of state court judgments); Williams v. L eone &

Keeble, Inc ., 254 P.3d 818, 821 ( Wash. 2011) (en banc) (setting forth elements of

the doctrine of res judicata under Washington law) ; Southcenter Joint Venture v.

Nat’l Democratic Policy Comm.

, 780 P.2d 1282, 1285 (1989) (en banc) (“ [A]

successor in interest to a party to an action that determines interests in property is

subject to the preclusive effects of that action.” (citations omitted) ).

We reject as without merit Szmania’s contention that defendants were time

barred from collecting on the n ote. See Edmundson v. Bank of Am.

, 378 P.3d 272,

277

- 78 ( Wash. Ct. App. 2 016) ( statute of limitations period on a claim to enforce

a n installment note accrues for each installment from the time it becomes due ).

We lack jurisdiction to consider the district court’s order denying Szmania’s

motion for reconsideration because Szmania failed to file an amended or separate3 16

- 36055

notice of appeal. See Whitaker v. Garcetti , 486 F.3d 572, 585 (9th Cir. 2007).

We do not cons ider matters not specifically a nd distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31529]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Proposed Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed Addition to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add a product to the Procurement 
List that will be furnished by nonprofit agency employing persons who 
are blind or have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Comments Must Be Received On Or Before: 2/6/2014.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 10800, Arlington, Virginia 22202-
4149.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT COMMENTS CONTACT:  Barry S. 
Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email 
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 USC 
8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested 
persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed action.

Addition

    If the Committee approves the proposed addition, the entities of 
the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to 
procure the product listed below from the nonprofit agency employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    The following product is proposed for addition to the Procurement 
List for production by the nonprofit agency listed:

Product:

CD-R Silver w/Jewel Case, 10pk

NSN: 7045-01-482-7540.
NPA: North Central Sight Services, Inc., Williamsport, PA.
Contracting Activity: DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY TROOP SUPPORT, 
PHILADELPHIA, PA.
Coverage: B-List for the Broad Government Requirement as aggregated 
by Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, Philadelphia, PA.

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013-31529 Filed 1-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
#### Arno G. Hoeppner, Respondent, v. Gevaert Photo-Producten, N. V., Defendant, and Gevaert Company of America, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
cl££i£X±i^ltAksLilsL P£T11TQN£R

FILED If^ COURT OF APPEALS

12th Cqurt ofAppeals Qistrlct

In "Re. hWnLXA/. MAY 11 rm

TYLER TEXAS

£ exnnb n.nu ^ 4V>e (s&VtVioner p£ PT\r^f\cLjffttftijJglLftBRK

po^ *a pro pr*>cx persona, \o> KumUu be.e^ in -formci

LC*^W^r£ o^u, or£ or cAX c& &\e SkW^ f.aiir V riAfcfr.

1<XQU.^\ ^Vrfrpmec^ *o ^j^pnM r£ VW,«a rr^aWoA.

VWefore, -V^ ffW\rv\ rt^ec\^Vi re^vicfo \Wt ^^ Ho<\

CoorV ^u^'ftA order arr^Tm onA W^Wm Vvvfr *niu\\ ^

J_^ J^Wntfak. XnVeof Am,

PWitiror \4e^\e*^ 'b, *WA*iO
. . •

COMMONWEAITHOFKENTUCKy *

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Inmate Name:

EASTEHU KEHTOClCt CORBgCTiaSM. COHfLEI

(Institution)

f

CERTIFICATION OP FUNDS DEPOSITED IN

PRISONER' S INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNT '

tits/ey fMrs/^/rt- t )4n«/''n Ik.

(Middle) (Last)

'•to? 9/9

~~-(Fl^tT

•Institutional I.D. Number:

^ X. ite&C L-fH^ of the gisTEM rr aamCBMg tamnxt . ;J7 (Institution)

Xmnate Accounts Office, do hereby certify that the aum q£

g //>/, /fid has been deposited to ' this "inmate'a , account

during the preceding six months.

.'

~ Signature 21 Author

/

cer Date

A 'k

.»>.♦»■-
KYDOC

REPORT NO. IBSR180 - 35

6 MONTH AVERAGE INCOME STATEMENT PAGE: 1 of 1

PROCESSED: 04/28/2015 10:50

FROM: 10/2014 TO: 03/2015 REQUESTOR: Karen S Guyn

DOC#: 228919 INMATE NAME: Anglin, Wesley Satterfield SSN: 405-35-7714

Deposit

Detail

Total

Deposit

FOR MONTH: October, 2014

Deposit Type: State Pay Earned $10.40

$10.40

FOR MONTH: November, 2014

Deposit Type: State Pay Earned $10.40

$10.40

FOR MONTH: December, 2014

Deposit Type: Christmas Money Deposit

State Pay Earned

$10.00

$14.30

$24.30

FOR MONTH: January, 2015

Deposit Type: State Pay Earned $18.20

$18.20

FOR MONTH: February, 2015

Deposit Type: State Pay Earned $20.80

$20.80

FOR MONTH: March, 2015

Deposit Type: State Pay Earned $19.50

$19.50

TOTAL AMOUNT : $ 103.60

6 MONTH AVERAGE: $17.27
### §2183. Protection of buildings and property

The Sergeants at Arms of the Senate and of the House of Representatives are authorized to make such regulations as they may deem necessary for preserving the peace and securing the Capitol from defacement, and for the protection of the public property therein, and they shall have power to arrest and detain any person violating such regulations, until such person can be brought before the proper authorities for trial.

(R.S. §1820.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 193 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

R.S. §1820 derived from acts Mar. 30, 1867, ch. 20, §2, 15 Stat. 12; Apr. 29, 1876, ch. 86, 19 Stat. 41.