alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

61 Forsyth Street SW

Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-10 February 7, 2000

CONTACT: Kenneth M. Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $2,750 FINE AGAINST WEST VIRGINIA

UNIVERSITY FOR RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS VIOLATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $2,750 civil penalty against West

Virginia University in Morgantown, West Virginia, for a violation of NRC license requirements related

to the security of radioactive materials the university uses for teaching and research.

The NRC has notified the university that the violation, found during an inspection in November

1999, includes several examples of the university staff failing to secure licensed materials from

unauthorized removal or access.

On at least four occasions (including during the time of the November NRC inspection), WVU

failed to adequately secure or maintain constant surveillance of portable gauges containing radioactive

materials stored in an area of the Civil Engineering Building. In addition, during the November

inspection, laboratories in the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, the Health Sciences Center North

and the Agricultural Sciences Center containing radioactive materials were found unlocked and

unattended.

At a predecisional enforcement conference with the NRC, WVU outlined corrective actions

designed to address the violations and prevent future problems. The NRC staff determined that since

the university’s own Radiation Safety Department had previously identified security problems with the

gauges, the corrective actions, while comprehensive, were not initially effective in preventing

recurrence.

The NRC also cited the university for several other violations that the agency felt did not

warrant a proposed civil penalty. These less significant violations included the failure to prohibit

eating and drinking in radioactive material work areas, failure to make proper surveys of radioactive

material work areas, improper labeling of radioactive waste and failure to adequately post radiation

signs in radioactive material work areas. Although the violations were not included in the proposed

civil penalty, the agency was concerned that many of them had been previously identified by the

Radiation Safety Department, but not effectively corrected.

The university has 30 days from receipt of the Notice of Violation to either pay the fine or

protest its imposition.

#####
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: January 24, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Howard J. Hoffman, EPA - OGC

SUBJECT: November 19, 2014 Telephone Call with Sue Tierney Regarding Proposed Clean

Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

On November 19, 2014, Joe Bryson of EPA-OAP and Howard J. Hoffman of EPA-OGC met by

telephone with Sue Tierney of the Analysis Group to discuss legal issues concerning the 

proposed Clean Power Plan for existing power plants.
### §134. Incidental expenses of law library

The incidental expenses of the law library shall be paid out of the appropriations for the Library of Congress.

(R.S. §83.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §83 derived from act July 14, 1832, ch. 221, §3, 4 Stat. 579.
### §5502. House emergency operations positions

#### (a) Establishment in certain offices

Effective with respect to fiscal year 2002 and each succeeding fiscal year, there are hereby established 2 additional positions in each of the following offices of the House of Representatives:

(1) The Office of the Clerk.

(2) The Office of the Chief Administrative Officer.

(3) The Office of the Sergeant at Arms.

#### (b) Duties

The duty of the personnel appointed to a position established under this section shall be to ensure the continuity of the operations of the House of Representatives during periods of emergency, in accordance with the direction of the head of the office in which the position is established.

#### (c) Rate of pay

The annual rate of pay provided for a position established under this section shall be determined by the head of the office in which the position is established.

#### (d) Appointment authority

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the head of the office in which a position is established under this section shall have the exclusive authority to appoint personnel to such a position.

(Pub. L. 107–68, title I, §118, Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 573.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 75f of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriations Act, 2002, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2002.
J.

P.2d 344 (1995); 

### Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (where no statute or court rule provides for appeal, no right to appeal exists). Therefore we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. Douglas J. cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Daniel Owens Carl E. G. Arnold Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2
### §1871. Expired appropriations available for deposit into Employees' Compensation Fund

#### (a) In general

Notwithstanding section 1101, available balances of expired Architect of the Capitol appropriations shall be available to the Architect of the Capitol to make the deposit to the credit of the Employees' Compensation Fund required by section 8147(b) of title 5.

#### (b) Effective date

This section shall apply with respect to appropriations for fiscal year 2013 and each year thereafter.

(Pub. L. 113–6, div. F, title VI, §1606, Mar. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 426.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1101, referred to in subsec. (a), is section 1101 of title I of div. F of Pub. L. 113—6, Mar. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 412, which is not classified to the Code.
Court of Appeals

Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler

BILL OF COSTS

Court of Appeals No. 12-14-00343-CV

Trial Court No. 2014C-0199

Carole Ann Wallace

Vs.

Barbara Louise Hernandez

DOCUMENTS FILED AMOUNT FEE PAID BY

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Indigent

Required Texas.gov efiling fee

Filing

$50.00

$25.00

$20.00

$100.00

Carole Ann Wallace

Carole Ann Wallace

Carole Ann Wallace

Carole Ann Wallace

TOTAL: $195.00

I, Cathy S. Lusk, Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler,

Texas, certify that the above copy of the Bill of Costs is true and correct. GIVEN UNDER MY

HAND AND SEAL OF SAID COURT, at Tyler, this 8th day of July 2015, A.D.

CATHY LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 151.55 Deductions for loss during processing.

Deductions for the loss of copper, lead, or zinc content during processing, as authorized by Chapter 26, Additional U.S. Note 1, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202), shall be made by the Center director in the liquidation of any entry only if the importer has followed the procedures set forth in that headnote. See §§ 19.17 through 19.25 of this chapter for procedures applicable to bonded smelting and refining warehouses.

[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17470, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51269, Dec. 21, 1988]
469 P.2d 151

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gene J. TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 9044.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

May 6, 1970.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and WATSON, SISK and McKENNA, Justices concurring.

TACKETT, Justice,

not participating.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 363, 81 N.M. 521, 469 P.2d 166 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
### §1348. Termination date

(a) For purposes of this subchapter the termination date of a single-employer plan is—

(1) in the case of a plan terminated in a standard termination in accordance with the provisions of section 1341(b) of this title, the termination date proposed in the notice provided under section 1341(a)(2) of this title,

(2) in the case of a plan terminated in a distress termination in accordance with the provisions of section 1341(c) of this title, the date established by the plan administrator and agreed to by the corporation,

(3) in the case of a plan terminated in accordance with the provisions of section 1342 of this title, the date established by the corporation and agreed to by the plan administrator, or

(4) in the case of a plan terminated under section 1341(c) or 1342 of this title in any case in which no agreement is reached between the plan administrator and the corporation (or the trustee), the date established by the court.

(b) For purposes of this subchapter, the date of termination of a multiemployer plan is—

(1) in the case of a plan terminated in accordance with the provisions of section 1341a of this title, the date determined under subsection (b) of that section; or

(2) in the case of a plan terminated in accordance with the provisions of section 1342 of this title, the date agreed to between the plan administrator and the corporation (or the trustee appointed under section 1342(b)(2) of this title, if any), or, if no agreement is reached, the date established by the court.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title IV, §4048, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 1028; Pub. L. 96–364, title IV, §402(a)(8), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1299; Pub. L. 99–272, title XI, §11016(a)(4), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 268.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–272 in provisions preceding par. (1) substituted "termination date" for "date of termination", redesignated pars. (1) to (3) as (2) to (4), respectively, added par. (1), in par. (2), as so redesignated, inserted "in a distress termination" after "terminated" and substituted "section 1341(c)" for "section 1341", and in par. (4), as so redesignated, substituted "under section 1341(c) or 1342 of this title" for "in accordance with the provisions of either section".

1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–364, §402(a)(8)(A), (B), designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), and inserted applicability to a single-employer plan.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 96–364, §402(a)(8)(C), added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–272 effective Jan. 1, 1986, with certain exceptions, see section 11019 of Pub. L. 99–272, set out as a note under section 1341 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–364 effective Sept. 26, 1980, except as specifically provided, see section 1461(e) of this title.
### Agenda for March 8 meeting between EPA and Veolia meeting between EPA and Veolia David Ogulei David Ogulei to: Doug Harris 03/06/2012 03:56 PM Cc: Genevieve Damico, Charles Hall Bcc: Jane Woolums Doug, Attached is the agenda and call -in information for Thursday's conference call. Let me know if you have any questions, or if you have additional topics for the agenda. As we discussed , we are not planning to have our attorney present at this call; however, if your attorney will be present, we will need to invite one of our attorneys as well. -David David Ogulei, Ph.D., P.E. U.S. EPA | Air & Radiation Division, A -18J 77 West Jackson Blvd. | Chicago, Illinois 60604 Phone: (312) 353-0987 | Ogulei.David@epa.gov

Agenda for March 8 2012 Veolia Conference Call.pdf
### §6137. Transfer of funds from appropriations account of Majority and Minority Leaders of Senate to appropriations account, Miscellaneous Items, within Senate contingent fund

#### (a) Requests for transfers

Upon the written request of the Majority or Minority Leader of the Senate, the Secretary of the Senate shall transfer during any fiscal year, from the appropriations account appropriated under the headings "Salaries, Officers and Employees" and "Offices of the Majority and Minority Leaders", such amount as either Leader shall specify to the appropriations account, within the contingent fund of the Senate, "Miscellaneous Items".

#### (b) Authority to incur expenses

The Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate are each authorized to incur such expenses as may be necessary or appropriate. Expenses incurred by either such leader shall be paid from the amount transferred pursuant to subsection (a) by such leader and upon vouchers approved by such leader.

#### (c) Authority to advance sums

The Secretary of the Senate is authorized to advance such sums as may be necessary to defray expenses incurred in carrying out subsections (a) and (b).

(Pub. L. 102–27, title II, Apr. 10, 1991, 105 Stat. 144.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 31a–2b of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Dire Emergency Supplemental Appropriations for Consequences of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm, Food Stamps, Unemployment Compensation Administration, Veterans Compensation and Pensions, and Other Urgent Needs Act of 1991.
§ 127.402 What is a program examination, who will conduct it, and what will SBA examine? ( a ) A program examination is an investigation by SBA officials or authorized third-party certifier that verifies the accuracy of any certification of a concern issued in connection with the concern's WOSB or EDWOSB status. Thus, examiners may verify that the concern currently meets the program's eligibility requirements, and that it met such requirements at the time of its application for certification, its most recent recertification, or its certification in connection with a WOSB or EDWOSB contract.
( b ) Examiners may review any information related to the concern's eligibility requirements. SBA may also conduct site visits.
( c ) It is the responsibility of program participants to ensure the information provided to SBA is kept up to date and is accurate. SBA considers all required information and documents material to a concern's eligibility and assumes that all information and documentation submitted are up to date and accurate unless SBA has information that indicates otherwise.
[85 FR 27664, May 11, 2020]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, David R. Callen, hereby certify that the March 31, 2009 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed by Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (the “Company”), which contains the Company’s financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ David R. Callen | Vice President, Finance |   |
|---------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| (David R. Callen)   | & Treasurer         |   |
|                |                    |   |
|                |                    |   |
| May 11, 2009   |                    |   |

 

1
#### Edith M. Brewer, Respondent, v. Town of Starkey, Yates County, Appellant.

Memorandum: In this action under article 15 of the Real Property Law for a determination of a claim to real estate, plaintiff claims that defendant waived its right to a jury trial by asking equitable relief in its affirmative defense by way of an injunction enjoining the plaintiff from interfering with the public highway, title to which is in question. We are not in accord with such contention. The facts set forth in the affirmative defense show no need for affirmative relief in order to afford complete protection to the defendant. Sections 466 and 467 of the Civil Practice Act relating to compulsory references are not applicable to the facts herein. The right to a jury trial was improperly denied *(United States Fidelity & Guar. Co.*v. *Goetz,*285 N. Y. 74). All concur. (The order refers the action to an official referee to hear, try and determine.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCum, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ.
### §6514. Orientation seminars, etc., for new Senators, Senate officials, or members of staffs of Senators or Senate officials; payment of expenses

Effective July 1, 1979, there is authorized an expense allowance for the Office of the Secretary of the Senate and the Office of Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate which shall not exceed $30,000 each fiscal year for each such office. Payments made under this section shall be reimbursements only for actual expenses (including meals and food-related expenses) incurred in the course of conducting orientation seminars for Senators, Senate officials, or members of the staffs of Senators or Senate officials and other similar meetings, in the Capitol Building or the Senate Office Buildings. Such payments shall be made upon certification and documentation of such expenses by the Secretary and Sergeant at Arms, respectively, and shall be made out of the contingent fund of the Senate upon vouchers signed by the Secretary and the Sergeant at Arms, respectively. Amounts received as reimbursement of such expenses shall not be reported as income, and the expenses so reimbursed shall not be allowed as a deduction, under title 26.

(Pub. L. 96–38, title I, §107(a), July 25, 1979, 93 Stat. 112; Pub. L. 99–88, title I, §193, Aug. 15, 1985, 99 Stat. 349; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095; Pub. L. 100–202, §101(i) [title I, §6], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–290, 1329–294; Pub. L. 102–392, title I, §3, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1706; Pub. L. 108–83, title I, §4, Sept. 30, 2003, 117 Stat. 1013; Pub. L. 110–161, div. H, title I, §6(a), Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2222.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 69a of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1979.

#### Amendments

2007—Pub. L. 110–161 substituted "$30,000" for "$25,000" in first sentence.

2003—Pub. L. 108–83 substituted "$25,000" for "$10,000" in first sentence.

1992—Pub. L. 102–392 substituted "$10,000" for "$4,000".

1987—Pub. L. 100–202 substituted "$4,000" for "$2,000".

1986—Pub. L. 99–514 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954", which for purposes of codification was translated as "title 26" thus requiring no change in text.

1985—Pub. L. 99–88 substituted "Senators, Senate officials, or members of the staffs of Senators or Senate officials" for "Senators and members of their staffs,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2007 Amendment

Pub. L. 110–161, div. H, title I, §6(b), Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2222, provided that: "The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2008 and each fiscal year thereafter."

#### Effective Date of 1987 Amendment

Pub. L. 100–202, §101(i) [title I, §6], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–290, 1329–294, provided that the amendment made by Pub. L. 100–202 is effective in the case of fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1986.
### §382. Notice of contest

#### (a) Filing of notice

Whoever, having been a candidate for election in the last preceding election and claiming a right to such office, intends to contest the election of a Member of the House of Representatives, shall, within thirty days after the result of such election shall have been declared by the officer or Board of Canvassers authorized by law to declare such result, file with the Clerk and serve upon the contestee written notice of his intention to contest such election.

#### (b) Contents and form of notice

Such notice shall state with particularity the grounds upon which contestant contests the election and shall state that an answer thereto must be served upon contestant under section 383 of this title within thirty days after service of such notice. Such notice shall be signed by contestant and verified by his oath or affirmation.

#### (c) Service of notice; proof of service

Service of the notice of contest upon contestee shall be made as follows:

(1) by delivering a copy to him personally;

(2) by leaving a copy at his dwelling house or usual place of abode with a person of discretion not less than sixteen years of age then residing therein;

(3) by leaving a copy at his principal office or place of business with some person then in charge thereof;

(4) by delivering a copy to an agent authorized by appointment to receive service of such notice;

(5) by mailing a copy by registered or certified mail addressed to contestee at his residence or principal office or place of business. Service by mail is complete upon mailing; or

(6) the verified return by the person so serving such notice, setting forth the time and manner of such service shall be proof of same, and the return post office receipt shall be proof of the service of said notice mailed by registered or certified mail as aforesaid. Proof of service shall be made to the Clerk promptly and in any event within the time during which the contestee must answer the notice of contest. Failure to make proof of service does not affect the validity of the service.

(Pub. L. 91–138, §3, Dec. 5, 1969, 83 Stat. 284; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §211(3), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1744.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–186, §211(3)(A), struck out "to the House of Representatives" after "for election".

Subsec. (c)(4), (5). Pub. L. 104–186, §211(3)(B), struck out "or" at end of par. (4) and inserted "or" at end of par. (5).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to any general or special election for Representative in, or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress of the United States occurring after Dec. 5, 1969, see section 19 of Pub. L. 91–138, set out as a note under section 381 of this title.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00378-CR

EX PARTE JOSE J. LOPEZ

From the 85th District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10-01439-CRF-85-A

ORDER O N R E H E A R I N G

Appellant’s motion for rehearing to reinstate appeal is granted. The Court’s 

memorandum opinion and judgment, dated January 15, 2015, are withdrawn, and this 

appeal is reinstated.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Order issued and filed February 12, 2015
#### § 132.21 Regulations applicable.

In addition to the regulations applicable to all mail importations (see part 145 of this chapter), the regulations in this subpart shall apply to mail importations of absolute quota merchandise.
460 P.2d 72

#### Art FRAZIER and Dale Stoner, Petitioners, v. The Honorable Edwin L. SWOPE, District Judge in and for the County of Bernalillo, Respondent.

No. 8901.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Oct. 8, 1969.

MOISE, COMPTON, TACKETT and WATSON, Justices, concurring; NOBLE, Chief Justice, being absent and not participating;

Ordered that the alternative writ of mandamus heretofore issued herein on August 28, 1969, be and the same is hereby made permanent.
§ 115.67 Approval certificate. The holder of the approval certificate shall, before using the vehicle for the carriage of goods under the cover of a TIR Carnet, fill in as may be required on the approval certificate: ( a ) The registration number given to the vehicle (item No. 1); or
( b ) In the case of a vehicle not subject to registration, particulars of his name and business address (item No. 8). (See Annex 4 of the Convention for model of certificate of approval.)