alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 145.51 Articles prohibited by section 305, Tariff Act of 1930. ( a ) *Types of articles.* Various articles, as described in section 305, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1305), and in part 12 of this chapter, are prohibited from importation. This prohibition includes the following types of articles: ( 1 ) Obscene matter;
( 2 ) Articles for causing unlawful abortion (see § 145.52 for the treatment of literature pertaining to such articles);
( 3 ) Matter advocating treason or insurrection against the United States or forcible resistance to any law of the United States;
( 4 ) Matter containing any threat to take the life of or inflict bodily harm upon any person in the United States; and
( 5 ) Lottery matter, except any lottery ticket, printed paper that may be used as a lottery ticket, or advertisement of any lottery, that is printed in Canada for use in connection with a lottery conducted in the United States.
( b ) *Disposition of articles.* Mail found to contain lottery matter shall be disposed of by the Postal Service under the postal laws and regulations. Mail found to contain any of the other prohibited articles described in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4) of this section shall be given appropriate treatment by Customs under the Customs laws and regulations (see § 12.40 of this chapter).
[T.D. 73-135, 38 FR 13369, May 21, 1973, as amended by T.D. 92-80, 57 FR 37702, Aug. 20, 1992]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-95 July 31, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC, RG&E TO DISCUSS APPARENT SECURITY VIOLATION AT R.E. GINNA

PLANT

An apparent violation of Nuclear Regulatory Commission

requirements relating to security at the R.E. Ginna nuclear power

plant will be the subject of a meeting between the agency’s staff

and Rochester Gas & Electric (RG&E) Corporation officials on

Tuesday, August 5. RG&E operates the plant, which is located in

Ontario, N.Y.

The predecisional enforcement conference will begin at 1

p.m. in the Public Meeting Room at the NRC Region I office in

King of Prussia, Pa. It will be open to the public for

observation.

Based on the results of an inspection conducted at the

plant in May, NRC staff determined there was one apparent

violation. It involves the failure to adequately protect the

facility against a land vehicle seeking unauthorized access to

vital plant areas.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference

does not mean that the NRC has determined a violation has

occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the

purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity

to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its

proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this

conference. That decision will be made by NRC officials at a

later time.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING RECEIVER RYAN K. STUMPHAUZER’S 

SECOND APPLICATION FOR ALLOWANCE AND PAYMENT OF 

PROFESSIONALS’ FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES 

FOR OCTOBER 1, 2020 – DECEMBER 31, 2020

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Receiver Ryan K. Stumphauzer’s Second 

Application for Allowance and Payment of Professionals’ Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses 

for October 1, 2020 – December 31, 2020 [ECF No. 491] (“Application”), filed on February 16, 

2021. The Court has reviewed the Application and is otherwise fully advised. 

This is a complex receivership involving the operation of a merchant cash advance business 

with a current receivable balance of over $400 million, and a group of investors that are seeking, 

collectively, more than $300 million dollars from the company. The Application and records 

submitted by the Receiver reflect that the Receiver and his professional team have reasonably and 

diligently discharged their duties. The Receiver’s tasks in this case have included obtaining 

access to and reviewing records, issuing subpoenas, responding to investor inquiries, investigating 

potential claims against third parties, overseeing the day-to-day operations of Par Funding through 

an operations consultant, assuming responsibilities over multiple commercial and residential 

properties with the assistance of a real estate management company, communicating with 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 492 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/20/2021 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

merchants to resolve disputes regarding account balances, responding to issues related to pending 

litigation involving the receivership entities, communicating with the Defendants and responding 

to discovery requests, and drafting status reports for the Court. In performing these tasks, among 

others, the Receiver and his professional team have provided a significant benefit to the 

receivership estate, investors, and creditors at rates that the Court finds reasonable. Accordingly, 

it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Application [ECF 491] is GRANTED as 

follows:

Professional Fees $2,228,194.00

Expenses $122,059.39

TOTAL $2,350,253.39

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 19th day of February, 2021.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 492 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/20/2021 Page 2 of 2
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-164 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of

12


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-164 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of

12


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-164 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 3 of

12


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-164 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 4 of

12


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-164 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 5 of

12


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-164 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 6 of

12


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-164 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 7 of

12


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-164 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 8 of

12


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-164 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 9 of

12


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-164 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 10 of

12


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-164 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 11 of

12


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-164 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 12 of

12
#### §§ 206.254-206.339 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Plessdore Realty Corp., Appellant. Nicholas M. Fasano et al., Respondents.

Upon the petition of the landlord, in a proceeding under the Business Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.), order determining the emergency rent of store premises occupied by respondent Fasano, insofar as appeal is taken, and order denying appellant’s motion to amend the order of reference, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Although a close question of fact was presented, it may not be held that the official referee’s finding is against the weight of the credible evidence. Under the procedure adopted by the parties there was no necessity for further findings. They elected to have the reasonable rental value of the premises determined as of June 1, 1944 — not the present day reasonable rent which might have been sought under section 4. A finding in the nature of a general verdict is, therefore, sufficient. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *post,*p. 868.]
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 119

**Question 119:** Is it permissible under 10 CFR Part 20 for a licensee to have a controlled area that is controlled for purposes of radiation protection but that is not a restricted area?

**Answer:** No. By definition, in Part 20, a "restricted area means an area, access to which is limited by the licensee for the purpose of protecting individuals against undue risks from exposure to radiation and radioactive materials." As stated in the answer to Question 26 (a) under the heading "Controlled Area": ". . . an area that satisfies both the definition of a restricted area and the definition of a controlled area is considered to be a restricted area for purposes of compliance with Part 20."

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1003)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017
### §113. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 113 was editorially reclassified as section 4109 of this title.
§ 418.6 Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Indian Reservation. Nothing in this part affects: ( a ) The authority of the Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe to use water on the Tribe's reservation which was delivered to the Reservation in accordance with this part; or
( b ) The Secretary's trust responsibility with respect to the Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe.
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 1 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 2 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 3 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 4 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 5 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 6 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 7 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 8 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 9 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 10 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 11 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 12 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 13 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 14 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 15 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 16 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 17 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 18 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 19 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 20 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 21 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 22 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 23 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 24 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 25 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1527 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 26 of 26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0              10,091,518
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0              16,133,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                (542,337)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0              29,106,595
<PP&E>                                               0              35,139,030
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0              (7,117,736)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0              94,861,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0              11,415,905
<BONDS>                                              0              37,116,171
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                     649
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                   9,884
<OTHER-SE>                                           0              41,706,843
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0              94,861,860
<SALES>                                     12,532,676              23,042,652
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,532,676              23,042,652
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,432,362              17,976,607
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (150,455)               (224,333)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               173,778                 275,519
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,012,750               1,404,206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,064,241               3,610,653
<INCOME-TAX>                                   701,842               1,227,622
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,362,399               2,383,031
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,362,399               2,383,031
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13                    0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12                    0.21
        

</TABLE>
#### J. Sklar Manufacturing Co., Petitioner, Appellant; Charles Fay, as President of Amalgamated Machine, Instrument & Metal Local No. 475 of United Electrical, Radio *&*Machine Workers of America, C.I.O., Respondent.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!

!!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!

!! !!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

96°W

96°W

94°W

94°W

92°W

92°W

90°W

90°W

88°W

88°W

86°W

86°W

84°W

84°W

82°W

82°W

80°W

80°W

22°N 22°N

24°N 24°N

26°N 26°N

28°N 28°N

30°N 30°N

32°N 32°N

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!

!!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!

!! !!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

96°W

96°W

94°W

94°W

92°W

92°W

90°W

90°W

88°W

88°W

86°W

86°W

84°W

84°W

82°W

82°W

80°W

80°W

22°N 22°N

24°N 24°N

26°N 26°N

28°N 28°N

30°N 30°N

32°N 32°N

The maritime boundaries and limits shown hereon,

as well as the divisions between planning areas,

are for initial planning purposes only and do not

necessarily reflect the full extent of U.S. sovereign

rights under international and domestic law.

±

TX

LA

MS AL GA

FL

FEDERAL OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF (OCS) ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES - GULF OF MEXICO REGION

New Administrative Boundaries

U.S. 200 NM Limit

Boundary Turning Points

GULF STATE OFFSHORE ADMINISTRATIVE

BOUNDARIES (PRELIMINARY)

March, 2009

Projection Geographic

North American Datum 1927

The Administrative boundaries shown on this

map have been computed with the Supreme

Court fixed baselines for Texas - Alabama and

the latest National Baseline for Florida (rounded

to 8 decimal places of a degree). The

precise coordinates are pending final review.

LEGEND
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 23

- 13241

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus ERIC GILLESPIE, a.k.a. E,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 3:21

- cr

- 00029

- CAR

- CHW

- 4 USCA11 Case: 23-13241 Document: 35-1 Date Filed: 04/04/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 23

- 13241

____________________
Before J ORDAN , G RANT , and L AGOA , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: The government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1345, 1350

– 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sente nce appeal waiver s are enforceable if made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Boyd , 975 F.3d 1185, 1192 (11th Cir. 2020) ( “ touchstone ” for assessing whether a sentence appeal waiver was made knowingly and voluntarily is whether it was clearly con veyed to the defendant that he was giving up his right to appeal under most circumstances )

. USCA11 Case: 23-13241 Document: 35-1 Date Filed: 04/04/2024 Page: 2 of 2
### §1437a. Training and education programs of employing offices

#### (a) Requiring offices to develop and implement programs

Each employing office shall develop and implement a program to train and educate covered employees of the office in the rights and protections provided under this chapter, including the procedures available under subchapter IV to consider alleged violations of this chapter.

#### (b) Report to committees

#### (1) In general

Not later than 45 days after the beginning of each Congress (beginning with the One Hundred Seventeenth Congress), each employing office shall submit a report to the Committee on House Administration of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate on the implementation of the program required under subsection (a).

#### (2) Special rule for first report

Not later than 180 days after December 21, 2018, each employing office shall submit the report described in paragraph (1) to the Committees described in such paragraph.

#### (c) Exception for offices of Congress

This section does not apply to an employing office of the House of Representatives or an employing office of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 104–1, title V, §509, as added Pub. L. 115–397, title III, §306(a)(2), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5324.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–1, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 3, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1301 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 509 of Pub. L. 104–1 was renumbered section 511 and is classified to section 1438 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon expiration of the 180-day period beginning on Dec. 21, 2018, with provisions for effect on pending proceedings, see section 401 of Pub. L. 115–397, set out as an Effective Date of 2018 Amendment note under section 1301 of this title.
### §4538. Reimbursement of residential telecommunications expenses for House Members, officers, and employees

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, official resources may be used during a fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 1999), in accordance with regulations of the Committee on House Oversight, to reimburse a Member, officer, or employee of the House of Representatives for the ordinary and necessary expenses related to the official use of telecommunications lines in the residence of the Member, officer, or employee.

(b) The Committee on House Oversight shall promulgate such regulations as are necessary to implement this section.

(Pub. L. 105–275, title I, §109, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2439.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 127b of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriations Act, 1999, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1999.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on House Oversight of House of Representatives changed to Committee on House Administration of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Jan. 6, 1999.
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________ Project No.: 0172.06.005.001 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1 _ of __1

_

Project Name: Annual Review/304m

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call Date: 03-12-09 Time: 9 a.m.

Company Name: Loudoun, TN Utilities Contact Name: Dave Birkholtz Phone No.: 865-458-2091 (W) or 865-740-6323 (C)

Name: Eleanor Ku Codding

GENERAL SUBJECT : Carbon Disulfide Discharges



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I called Mr. Birkholtz to discuss the Viskase Corporat ion facility in Loudoun, TN:

Viskase Corp. – Loudon, TN (37774-VSKSC-EASTL)

• Viskase’s carbon disulfide discharges account for 86 % o f Plastics Category TWPE for 2007.

• ERG contacted the regional pre-treatment coordinator for RY 2005:

o ERG received monitoring data from pre-treatment coordinator

.

o One of the two samples were below the detection limit in 2005.

o ERG determined that carbon disulfide load should be reduced from 97,000 lb to 17 lb for 2005 TRI data (2.72 lb after POTW treatment).

o Facility may have been calculating carbon disulfide releases without monitoring data collected by

Loudon Utilities.

TWPE

Chemical 2002 2003 2004 2005 2007
Carbon disulfide 34,498 35,842 40,322 8 45,699



### In 2008, Mr. Birkholz had provided sampling data showing that th e majority of the carbon disulfide readings

from Viskase were below detection limits. He stated th at the measurements have been similar since 2008, and he will e-mail ERG the more recent sampling data. Mr. Birkholz collects his samples where the Viskase pipe enters his POTW (the Viskase facility is adjacent to his treatment plant).
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, FL 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:20-CV-22603-GOODMAN [CONSENT CASE]

ERIC CHAVEZ, ET AL.,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GRILL ENTERPRISES, LLC AND 

RUBEN SIERRA, 

Defendants.

_______________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Defendants, Grill Enterprises, LLC, and Ruben Sierra, notify the Court that the parties 

have settled their dispute and are in the process of negotiating and executing the written Settlement

Agreement.

Dated this 4th day of August 2023.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq. (174742)

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Defendants

Case 1:20-cv-22603-JG Document 198 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2023 Page 1 of 1