alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PAGE | 1 of 2

LAW OFFICES OF JIBRAEL S. HINDI, PLLC

110 SE 6th Street, 17th Floor | Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 | Phone (954) 907-1136 | Fax (855) 529-9540 

www.JibraelLaw.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 1:20-CV-22665-DPG

FLORIDA FAIR HOUSING 

ALLIANCE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PALM BAY GRAND, LLC d/b/a PALM 

BAY GRAND, 

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

NOTICE OF PENDING SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff FLORIDA FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, INC., by and through undersigned 

counsel, hereby submits this Notice of Pending Settlement and states the parties have reached a 

settlement with regard to this case and are presently drafting, finalizing, and executing the formal 

settlement documents. Upon full execution of the same, the parties will file the appropriate 

dismissal documents with the Court.

Dated: September 14, 2020

Respectfully Submitted,

 /s/ Jibrael S. Hindi .

JIBRAEL S. HINDI, ESQ.

Florida Bar No.: 118259

E-mail: jibrael@jibraellaw.com

THOMAS J. PATTI, ESQ.

Florida Bar No.: 118377

E-mail: tom@jibraellaw.com

The Law Offices of Jibrael S. Hindi

110 SE 6th Street, Suite 1744

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Phone: 954-907-1136

Fax: 855-529-9540

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 1:20-cv-22665-DPG Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2020 Page 1 of 2
PAGE | 2 of 2

LAW OFFICES OF JIBRAEL S. HINDI, PLLC

110 SE 6th Street, 17th Floor | Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 | Phone (954) 907-1136 | Fax (855) 529-9540 

www.JibraelLaw.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 14, 2020, the forgoing was electronically via 

the Court’s CM/ECF system on all counsel of record. 

 /s/ Jibrael S. Hindi .

JIBRAEL S. HINDI, ESQ.

Florida Bar No.: 118259

Case 1:20-cv-22665-DPG Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2020 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I W. Kerry Jackson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  September 8, 2004 | By:  /s/ W. Kerry JacksonW. Kerry Jackson
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anyone interested in obtaining a roster of members, minutes of the meeting, or other relevant information should write or contact Ms. Elaine G. Cohen, M.S., R.N., Executive Secretary, National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice, Parklawn Building, Room 9-35, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, telephone (301) 443-1405. 

Dated: October 14, 2004. 

Tina M. Cheatham, 

Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination. 

[FR Doc. 04-23627 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
No. 13,134.

#### Jouflos et al *v.*Pitchford et al.

(14 P. [2d] 1097)

Decided September 12, 1932.

Mr. E. G-. Vahatta, for plaintiffs in error.

No appearance for defendants in error.

*En Bam.*

Mr. Chief Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

The district court decreed an apportionment and division of a certain public range in Moffat county, Colorado, partly for the use of cattle and partly for sheep, pursuant to the provisions of chapter 125, Session Laws 1929. Later some of the sheepmen broug’ht supplementary proceedings against other sheepmen under section 6 of the same act, to establish that certain territory theretofore *285adjudged to be exclusive sheep range was overstocked; that the excessive use was permanently destroying the vegetation, and will do so; that the territory is capable of supporting only 70,000 head; that petitioners are entitled to priority of use, and for an injunction. Evidence was taken and the court found and decreed for the petitioners. Jouflos and other respondents against whom the injunction was obtained assign error and ask for a supersedeas.

The evidence is not preserved by bill of exceptions and we must therefore assume that it is sufficient to support the decree.

Plaintiffs in error challenge the constitutionality of the above act of the Legislature upon grounds similar to those presented in No. 12,881, *Allen v. Bailey,*91 Colo. 260, 14 P. (2d) 1087, but upon the authority of that case the judgment must be affirmed.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-148 November 14, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC, BOSTON EDISON TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT PILGRIM

A predecisional enforcement conference will be held between

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff and Boston Edison Company

officials on Friday, November 21, to discuss apparent violations of

agency requirements at the utility’s Pilgrim nuclear power plant. The

infractions pertain to design and engineering issues at the facility,

which is located in Plymouth, Mass., and owned and operated by Boston

Edison.

The meeting will begin at 10 a.m. in the Public Meeting Room at

the NRC Region 1 office in King of Prussia, Pa. It will be open to

the public for observation.

Among the apparent violations to be discussed are: an

unreviewed safety question and several instances in which procedures

were changed without appropriate written safety evaluations; design

control issues and inconsistencies between safety analyses and

operating procedures; inadequate corrective actions regarding

significant conditions adverse to quality; and failure to report the

operation of the plant in unanalyzed conditions outside the facility’s

design basis, or operational blueprint.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference

does not mean that the NRC has determined a violation has occurred or

that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to

provide the licensee with an opportunity to point out any errors that

may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable the

licensee to outline its proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this

conference. That decision will be made by NRC officials at a later

time.

#
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

No. III-00-68 December 19, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $11,000 FINE AGAINST A MINNESOTA ENGINEERING

CONSULTING COMPANY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed an $11,000 fine against Stork/Twin

City Testing for deliberately failing to have two individuals present during radiography at a temporary

job site. Stork/Twin City Testing is an engineering consulting company that is based in St. Paul,

Minnesota.

The company’s radiation safety officer between June 27, 1998, and December 30, 1999,

allowed radiographic operations to occur at a temporary job site with only one individual present.

However, the radiation safety officer knew there should be two individuals present when such activity

was taking place at a location that had not been approved by the NRC as a permanent radiographic

installation. There is no indication that the actions resulted in radiological exposures in excess of

regulatory limits.

The NRC increased the fine from $5,500 to $11,000 because the violation was willful, had

been identified by an NRC inspector, resulted in financial gain, and lasted about one-and-a-half years.

The company has until January 11, 2001, to pay the fine or protest it. If the fine is protested

and subsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the company may request a hearing.

###
2008 National Emissions Inventory for T100 non-ICAO Regulated Aircraft

Aircraft TypeAnalysis YearLTO Fuel (KG) CO (KG)THC (KG) ATR42-2 2008 74 9,766 182 1 BEECH1900-C 2008192,543 16,652,016 1,629,549546,623 BEECH200 2008 2,628 167,521 7,147 1,589 BEECH99 2008 673 47,043 680 48 CASA212-2 2008 9,342 744,258 9,454 871 DHC6-1 2008 302 22,073 218 15 DHC8-1 2008183,04424,024,472 449,368 1,281 DHC8-2 200859,458 9,660,985 108,608 499 DHC8-3 200832,585 5,364,223 58,189 278 DO328-1 2008 2,018 309,651 3,470 18 EMB120 2008165,62121,077,646 362,668 1,147 F27 2008 1,507 349,493 37,746 9,571 G21G 2008 876 79,560 3,123 5,168 HS748-1 2008 124 23,043 2,968 752 J31 2008 85 4,788 152 14 SA227 2008 3,626 233,871 6,954 664 SAAB340-A 2008 4,238 417,333 0 2,474 SAAB340-B 2008246,29824,091,908 284,969146,695 SC7-3-1 2008 242 16,756 614 845 SD330 2008 626 59,686 1,643 284 BEECH18 200813,686 2,049,078 619,403 87,852 BEECH90 2008 1,090 83,431 2,108 145 BELL206 2008 1,722 34,423 2,162 435 BN2A-III 2008 9,824 402,165 353,712 10,202 CNA208 2008236,34211,152,944 194,407 19,500 CNA550 2008 96 15,478 720 287 CNA650 2008 353 57,963 1,337 295 FAL10 2008 797 103,344 3,356 1,211 FAL900 2008 23 5,132 128 29 PA31 200850,489 1,805,273 1,620,582 36,431 PA31T 2008 1,728 155,540 1,114 74 PC12 2008 4,706 504,499 19,195 6,018 S76 2008 5,159 473,493 14,234 14,845

1,231,925120,198,856 5,800,159896,161 TotalNMHC (KG)VOC (KG)TOG (KG)NOX (KG)SOX (KG)PM-10 (KG)PM-25 (KG) 1 1 1 69 13 0 0 632,025628,729632,025 53,58621,514 0 0 1,838 1,828 1,838 629 216 0 0 55 55 55 286 61 0 0 1,007 1,002 1,007 5,751 962 0 0 17 17 17 143 29 0 0 1,481 1,473 1,481 167,48131,040 0 0 577 574 577 80,75212,482 0 0 322 320 322 45,139 6,931 0 0 20 20 20 2,565 400 0 0 1,327 1,320 1,327 154,68627,232 0 0 11,066 11,009 11,066 740 452 0 0 5,976 5,945 5,976 678 103 0 0 870 865 870 20 30 0 0 17 17 17 28 6 0 0 768 764 768 1,547 302 0 0 2,861 2,846 2,861 2,036 539 0 0 169,613168,729169,613 120,68031,127 0 0 978 972 978 88 22 0 0 328 326 328 311 77 0 0 76,644 73,331 86,069 9,509 2,647 0 0 167 166 167 448 108 0 0 503 501 503 104 44 0 0 8,900 8,516 9,995 455 520 0 0 22,546 22,429 22,546 75,58514,410 0 0 332 330 332 86 20 (a) (a) 341 339 341 504 75 0 0 1,400 1,393 1,400 595 134 0 0 33 33 33 40 7 0 0 31,783 30,409 35,691 1,865 2,332 0 0 85 85 85 1,110 201 0 0 6,958 6,922 6,958 3,058 652 0 0 17,165 17,075 17,165 2,391 612 0 0

998,004988,3391,012,432 732,963155,297 0 0
§ 12.43 Proof of admissibility. ( a ) If an importer of any article detained under § 12.42(e) or (g) desires to contend that the article was not mined, produced, or manufactured in any part with the use of a class of labor specified in section 307, Tariff Act of 1930, he shall submit to the port director or Commissioner of CBP within 3 months after the date the article was imported a certificate of origin, or its electronic equivalent, in the form set forth below, signed by the foreign seller or owner of the article. If the article was mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in a country other than that from which it was exported to the United States, an additional certificate, or its electronic equivalent, in such form and signed by the last owner or seller in such other country, substituting the facts of transportation from such other country for the statements with respect to shipment from the country of exportation, shall be so submitted. Certificate of Origin I, ________________, foreign seller or owner of the merchandise hereinafter described, certify that such merchandise, consisting of ________________ (Quantity) of ________________ (Description) in ____________________ (Number and kind of packages) bearing the following marks and numbers ____________ was mined, produced, or manufactured by ________________ (Name) at or near ________________, and was laden on board ____________________ (Carrier to the United States) at ________________ (Place of lading) (Place of final departure from country of exportation) which departed from on ____________; (Date); and that ____________________ (Class of labor specified in finding) was not employed in any stage of the mining, production, or manufacture of the merchandise or of any component thereof. Dated ____________ (Signature)
( b ) The importer shall also submit to the port director or Commissioner of CBP within such 3-month period a statement, or its electronic equivalent, of the ultimate consignee of the merchandise, showing in detail that he had made every reasonable effort to determine the source of the merchandise and of every component thereof and to ascertain the character of labor used in the production of the merchandise and each of its components, the full results of his investigation, and his belief with respect to the use of the class of labor specified in the finding in any stage of the production of the merchandise or of any of its components.
( c ) If the certificate or certificates and statements specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, or its electronic equivalent, are submitted within the time prescribed and the Commissioner finds that the merchandise is admissible, the port director concerned will be advised to that effect, whereupon he shall release the merchandise upon compliance with the usual entry requirements.
[28 FR 14710, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61285, Oct. 13, 2015; CBP Dec. 17-04, 82 FR 26584, June 8, 2017]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, Brian J. Recatto, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services
Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: August 26, 2010



/s/    BRIAN J.
RECATTOBrian J. Recatto
President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2


                           GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.
                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greg Manning Auctions,
Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2003, I, Larry Crawford, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   1. this Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with
   the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
   Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended September
   30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
   and results of operations of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc.


Dated:   November 11, 2003
                                    /s/ Larry Crawford
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                    Larry Crawford, Executive Vice President
                                    and Chief Financial Officer
#### Henry Christian OLSEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-6301.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 29, 2002.

Henry Christian Olsen, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*385PER CURIAM.

Henry Christian Olsen appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Olsen v. Angelone,*No. CA-01-310-7 (W.D.Va. Jan. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
### §3292. Performance accountability system

Programs and activities authorized in this subchapter are subject to the performance accountability provisions described in section 3141 of this title.

(Pub. L. 113–128, title II, §212, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1614.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 657 

To modify the presumption of service connection for veterans who were 

exposed to herbicide agents while serving in the Armed Forces in Thailand during the Vietnam era, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2021 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself, Mr. TESTER, Mr. WYDEN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. 

WARREN, Mr. PORTMAN, Ms. HASSAN, and Mr. BRAUN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To modify the presumption of service connection for veterans 

who were exposed to herbicide agents while serving in 

the Armed Forces in Thailand during the Vietnam era, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 657 IS

1 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE 

2 CONNECTION FOR VETERANS WHO WERE EX3 POSED TO HERBICIDE AGENTS WHILE SERV4 ING IN THE ARMED FORCES IN THAILAND 

5 DURING THE VIETNAM ERA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

7 shall ensure that if the Secretary creates a presumption 

8 of service connection between the occurrence of a disease 

9 and exposure to a herbicide agent while serving in the 

10 Armed Forces during the covered period at a military base 

11 in Thailand, such presumption also applies to exposure to 

12 a herbicide agent while serving in the Armed Forces dur13 ing the covered period at any military base located in 

14 Thailand without regard to where on the base the veteran 

15 was located or what military job specialty the veteran per16 formed. 

17 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

18 (1) COVERED PERIOD.—The term ‘‘covered pe19 riod’’ means the period beginning on January 9, 

20 1962, and ending on June 30, 1976. 

21 (2) HERBICIDE AGENT.—The term ‘‘herbicide 

22 agent’’ has the meaning given such term in section 

23 1116(a) of title 38, United States Code. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 657 IS

1 (3) VETERAN.—The term ‘‘veteran’’ has the 

2 meaning given such term in section 101 of title 38, 

3 United States Code. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### James F. Mister, Administrator of John Dowling, Deceased, Respondent, v. Thomas Corrigan, Appellant.

May 4, 1885.

Case Adjudged. — Cause submitted by agreement of parties, and leave to appellant to file brief and statement within ten days ; neither brief nor statement filed within said time, nor was there any assignment of errors. *Held:*that the law absolutely requires a statement and brief, and they cannot be dispensed with even by *agreement.*— Dike v. *Frank,*52 Mo. 551; *Snyder*v. *Hopkins,*39 Mo. 413.

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court, Hon. Turner A. Gill, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

John C. Tarsney, for the appellant.

Dunlap & Freeman, Milton Moore, and James F. Mister, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Ellison, J.

When this cause was submitted, by agreement of the parties and consent of the court, the appellant was given ten days in which to file his brief and statement.

Though the ten days have long since expired, there is as yet no brief or statement in behalf of appellant. It is likewise discovered, on examination, there is no assign*511ment oí errors. The law absolutely requires a statement and brief, and they cannot be dispensed with even by *agreement.*— Dike v. *Frank,*52 Mo. 551; *Snyder v. Hopkins,*39 Mo. 418. The judgment below is affirmed.

The other judges concur.