alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1





Ener1,
      Inc.


500
      West
      Cypress Creek Road-Suite 100


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309





May
      15,
      2007





Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549





Re:
      Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350





Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1,
      Inc.,
      for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission, I, Dr. Peter Novak, Chief Executive Officer of Ener1, Inc., hereby
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1)
            such
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended
                March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and2)
            the
                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
                Ener1,
                Inc., for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                Ener1, Inc.





/s/
                Dr. Peter NovakDr.
                Peter Novak
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer and
              Duly
                Authorized Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
      retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.





This
      certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to Ener1, Inc. `s
      quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
      to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
      reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
      except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
      filing.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23340]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel Pediatric Pharmacology Research 
Units Coordinating Center.
    Date: November 5, 2004.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Hameed Khan, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6902, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e15161f10163e131f17125010171650191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93f8fbf2fdfbd3fef2faffbdfdfafbbdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: October 12, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-23340 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-28 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Monday, April 19, 1999)

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MEETING AT HATCH

Meeting Is Open To Observation By The Public

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a meeting with the operators of the

Hatch nuclear power plant, located near Baxley, Georgia, at 10:30 a.m. on Thursday, April 22,

to discuss results of the agency’s latest Plant Performance Review for the facility. Results of

the review are contained in NRC news release 99-21, issued on April 2.

The meeting will be held in the plant’s maintenance training building and is open to

observation by members of the public. NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to

answer questions from interested observers and meet with state and local officials who attend.

#
#### § 295.4 Organization of this part 295.

This part contains six subparts. Subpart A provides an overview of the CGFAA process. Subpart B describes the procedures for bringing a claim. Subpart C explains what compensation is available. Subpart D discusses the claims evaluation process. Subpart E explains the dispute resolution process. Subpart F contains a glossary in which various terms used in the rule are defined.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2742

DEAN W. SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RAVEN HOCKING COAL CORPORATION, an Ohio corporation; WAMPUM HARDWARE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation; MACK ENERGY COMPANY, an

Ohio corporation; EASTERN KENTUCKY EXPLOSIVES,

a Kentucky corporation,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-738-3)

Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 6, 1998

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dean W. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Randall Lee Trautwein, LAMP,

O'DELL, BARTRAM, ENTSMINGER, LEVY & TRAUTWEIN, P.L.L.C., Huntington, West Virginia; John Tyler Dinsmore, FLAHERTY, SENSABAUGH &

BONASSO, Charleston, West Virginia; Barry Michael Taylor, JENKINS

FENSTERMAKER, P.L.L.C., Huntington, West Virginia; Edward Martin

Kowal, Jr., CAMPBELL, WOODS, BAGLEY, EMERSON, MCNEER & HERNDON,

Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appellant's requests to reverse the decision of the Supreme Court of

West Virginia and to remand the action to the Circuit Court of

Mason County, West Virginia. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's report

and recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Raven

Hocking Coal Corp., No. CA-97-738-3 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 5, 1997).

Additionally, we deny Appellees' motion to dismiss for lack of

jurisdiction as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
### §104e. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 104e was editorially reclassified as section 4712 of this title.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4990 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to increase the mileage of the 

Appalachian Development Highway System to provide for improvements 

to and expansion of Corridor K in North Carolina, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 

Mr. TILLIS (for himself and Mr. BURR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to increase the 

mileage of the Appalachian Development Highway System to provide for improvements to and expansion of 

Corridor K in North Carolina, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APPALACHIAN DEVELOPMENT HIGHWAY SYS4 TEM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 14501(a) of title 40, 

6 United States Code, is amended, in the second sentence, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4990 IS

1 by striking ‘‘three thousand and ninety miles’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘3,105 miles’’. 

3 (b) PURPOSE.—The increase in mileage to the Appa4 lachian Development Highway System made by the 

5 amendment made by subsection (a) shall be for improve6 ments to and expansion of Corridor K in North Carolina. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-53 May 12, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

LIMERICK RATED "SUPERIOR" IN THREE AREAS,

"GOOD" IN FOURTH AREA OF LATEST NRC ASSESSMENT

Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, received performance

ratings of "superior" in the areas of plant operations, maintenance

and plant support and "good" in the area of engineering in the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission's latest Systematic Assessment of Licensee

Performance (SALP) of the facility.

The SALP report was sent Friday (May 9) to PECO Energy Company,

which operates the plant in Limerick, Pa. It evaluates the plant's

performance from April 2, 1995, through March 29, 1997.

NRC staff will meet with PECO officials at the facility at 10

a.m. on May 27 to discuss the report. The session will be open for

public observation.

SALP reports rate licensee performance in four functional areas -

- plant operations, maintenance, engineering and plant support -- and

assign ratings of Category 1 (superior), 2 (good) or 3 (acceptable).

Limerick had received "superior" ratings in all four categories in its

previous SALP.

In a letter to PECO, NRC Region I Administrator Hubert J.

Miller said, "the overall performance of Limerick Generating

Station remained excellent."

Mr. Miller said, "The areas of plant Operations and

Maintenance were rated Category 1 as a result of effective

programs and procedures, excellent personnel performance, strong

management oversight and support, and very good planning and work

control. Additionally, equipment work backlogs were well managed

and material condition of the plant was good overall."

On plant support, he said, "While there were some problems

in fire protection, strengths were noted in radiation protection,

emergency planning and security."

"While strengths were noted in design, analysis and

modifications, earlier engineering intervention could have

prevented equipment problems that challenged the plant and

resulted in a number of plant trips and forced shutdowns.

Management recognized this performance weakness and initiated

remedial actions, said Mr. Miller."

#
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22993]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group, Function, Integration, and 
Rehabilitation Sciences Subcommittee.
    Date: November 1-2, 2004.
    Time: 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Select Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Anne Krey, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health 
and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6908, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1f7e742b2e705f71767731787069"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c2a3a9f6f3ad82acabaaeca5adb4">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 6, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22993 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §766. Definition of covered school

In this subchapter, the term "covered school" means an elementary school or secondary school (as such terms are defined in section 7801 of title 20) or an institution of higher education.

(Pub. L. 93–112, title II, §206, as added Pub. L. 113–128, title IV, §437, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1671; amended Pub. L. 114–95, title IX, §9215(mmm)(2), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2188.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 770, Pub. L. 93–112, title III, §301, formerly §300, Sept. 26, 1973, 87 Stat. 377; Pub. L. 95–602, title I, §122(c)(1), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2987; Pub. L. 99–506, title I, §103(d)(2)(C), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1810; Pub. L. 100–630, title II, §204(a), Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3308; renumbered §301 and amended Pub. L. 102–569, title I, §102(p)(15), title III, §301(a), (b)(3), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4358, 4410, 4411, contained congressional declaration of purpose, prior to the general amendment of subchapter III of this chapter by Pub. L. 105–220.

#### Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–95 made technical amendment to reference in original act which appears in text as reference to section 7801 of title 20.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2015 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–95 effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as a note under section 6301 of Title 20, Education.
§ 108.2001 When and how SSBICs may apply for Operational Assistance grants. ( a ) *Notice of Funds Availability (“NOFA”).* SBA will publish a NOFA in the Federal Register, advising SSBICs of the availability of funds for Operational Assistance grants to SSBICs. This NOFA will be the same NOFA described in § 108.300(a), or will be published simultaneously with that NOFA. An SSBIC may submit an application for an Operational Assistance grant only during the time period specified for such purpose in the NOFA.
( b ) *Application form.* An SSBIC must apply for an Operational Assistance grant using the application packet provided by SBA. Upon receipt of an application, SBA may request clarifying or technical information on the materials submitted as part of the application.
[67 FR 68503, Nov. 12, 2002]
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 217 ) IV-C-18

4 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:21:03 AM Sheet 217 of 232

## f"% 

# w
% P«J ^ ^ P. 2 

### A-27-I I

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y

WASHINGTON , D.C . 20460 

## NO V 2 2 199 1 Mr . Roland Robinso n Robinson' s R.F.D . 2 , Bo x 2 9 Alburg , V T 0544 0 Dea r Mr . Robinson : 

### ?, « 

# u JA N I R 

### 199 2 \[ 5 OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N

Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r Octobe r 3 , 199 1 lette r t o EPA Administrato r WilliamK . Reill yregarding implementatio n o f vehicl e onboar d refueling vapo r recoverysystems . W e appreciat e you r interes t i n thi s rulemaking . EPAi s proceeding wit hth e rulemaking proces s fo r onboar d control s a s require d b yth e Clea n Ai r Ac t Amendment s o f 1990 . A s par t o f thi s process , Congres s directe d EPAt o consul t wit h th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n (DOT ) regarding onboar d system safety . Thi s consultatio n i s wel l underway . Th e Nationa l HighwayTraffi c Safet yAdministratio n (NHTSA) , whic hi s par t o f th e DOT , release d a stud yo f onboar d system safet yi n Jul y 1991 . W e ar e reviewing thi s stud yan d hav e place d a copyi n th e publi c docke t fo r thi s rulemaking . W e als o hel d a hearing o n Septembe r 26t han

d 27t ht o solici t comment s fro mth e publi c o n thi s issue . W e ar e i n th e proces s o f making th e fina l determinatio n o n ho wt o procee d wit hth e rul e base d o n DOT' S conclusion s regarding safet yrisk s o f onboar d system s an d o n the record develope d during th e commen t period . Thank yo u agai n fo r you r concer n i n thi s matter . You r lette r wil l b e include d i n th e publi c docket . Pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t m e i f yo u requir e an yadditiona l information . Sincerel yyours , 

### ORIGINA L SIGNE D B Y DONAL D E . ZINGE R Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s
cc : Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1 SDSB:Barba:Connell:256 5 Plymout hRd.:X515:11/13/91:ID#9988 W Las t Reviewe d b

yCharle s Gray:ll/21/91:Contro l No . UNCT-91-089 0 Reviewe d b

yDZinger:BJR:X7647:AR-455:ll/21/91:Wan g No . 2642 T

Printed on Recycled

Paper
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-112 July 14, 2000

NRC INVITES PUBLIC TO SUBMIT NOMINATIONS FOR

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is seeking qualified candidates for

appointment to two vacancies on its Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS).

The ACRS was established by Congress to provide the NRC with independent expert advice on

matters related to licensing and the safety of existing and proposed nuclear power plants. The

Committee’s work currently emphasizes safety issues associated with the operation of 103 commercial

nuclear power plants in the United States; the pursuit of a risk-informed, and performance-based

regulatory approach; review of license renewal applications; digital instrumentation and control

systems; and technical issues related to standard plant designs.

The ACRS membership is drawn from a variety of engineering and scientific disciplines needed

to conduct the broadly based review for these facilities, as well as proposed standards and criteria and

related research activities. At this time, the Commission is specifically seeking to fill two vacancies

with expertise in structural mechanics/materials engineering and metallurgy applicable to nuclear

power systems, and the application of risk methods related to nuclear safety issues. Candidates are

selected to provide a balanced technical base consistent with the requirements of the Federal Advisory

Committee Act.

Because conflict-of-interest regulations restrict the participation of members actively involved

in the regulated aspects of the nuclear industry, the degree and nature of any such involvement will be

weighed. Each qualified candidate’s financial interests must be reconciled with applicable Federal and

NRC rules and regulations prior to final appointment. This might require divestiture of securities

issued by nuclear industry entities, or discontinuance of industry-funded research contracts or grants.

A resumé describing the educational and professional background of the candidate, including

any special accomplishments, professional references, current address and telephone number should be

provided. Criteria used to evaluate candidates include education and experience, demonstrated skills in

nuclear safety matters, and the ability to solve problems. Candidates must be citizens of the United

States. All candidates will receive careful consideration. An indication of the candidate’s ability and

willingness to devote the time required (approximately 60-100 days per year) should also be provided.

Applications will be accepted until September 29, 2000.
Copies of resumés of nominees should be sent to the Office of Human Resources, ATTN:

Robin Avent, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555-0001.

##
#### The People of the State of New York v. Daniel Sinnott.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Exhibit 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Shoe Carnival,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 2, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, W. Kerry Jackson,
Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:
     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ W. Kerry Jackson
--------------------
Chief Financial Officer
December 12, 2002