## P. 1



# OAR Box 

# 1415 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



# Document

Number: 

# 20 ) IV-H- 1
Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/15/20089:38:26

AM Sheet 20of 130

## P. 2



# *



# MEMORANDU M

TO : Reinforce dPlasti c Composite s NESHA PDocke t FROM : KeithBarnett

EPA/OAQPS/ESD/MIC G DATE : January 3 , 200 2 SUBJECT : Briefin g forth e Small Busines s Administratio nandOffice o f Managemen t

andBudge t onplanne dchange s t o th e propose dReinforce dPlasti c Composite s NESHAP

. LOCATION : Briefin g wa s conducte db y teleconferenc e ot f Pf^ y ^' J <*® ATTENDEES : Mr
. Bryo nAllen Mr
. KeithBarnett Mr
. Austi nPere z PURPOS E Office o f Managemen t

andBudge t

(OMB ) U.S

. Environmental Protectio nAgenc y Small Busines s Administratio n(SBA )

Th e purpos e o f

th e briefin g was t o updat e SB AandOM B onplanne dchange s t o th e propose dReinforce dPlasti c Composite s ENESHAP

. Th e informatio nprovide di s attache dt o thi s cover sheet

.

## P. 3



# / Keit h Barnet

t 05/16/200 2 11:0 6 A M To : Bryon_P._Allen@omb.eop.gov , austin.perez@sba.gov , Penny Lassiter/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA cc : To m Kelly/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Subject : Briefin g Material s Fo rReinforce d Plasti cComposite s 

# Th e conference cal l t o discus s changes t o th e Reinforce d Plasti cComposite s NESHA P i s set u p fo r3:30 o n Ma y21

. Th e call-i n numbe ri s 919-541-4332

. I hav e attache d th e material s I wil l discus s durin g th e briefing

.

OMB-SBABriefin.q.wr

. Cost Effectivenes s Apri l 24-2002-Summ ; Proposal-Draft Promulgatio n Floo rCompar i
CC-C Ltables.x l


# Keit h W

. Barnet

t US/EP AOAQPS , ESD/MIC G C504-05 Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2771 1 919-541-5605 barnett.keith@epa.gov



# 7 -

## P. 4



# \ 

# BRIEFIN GO NREINFORCE D PLASTIC S COMPOSITE S MAC T

Propose d Rule : Th e rul e w e propose drequire dfacilitie s inth e following process/produc t grouping s t o g o above

the-floo r ofth e facilit

y emitte dover

100 tp y o f

HA P(25 0 tp y if

asmall business) : Ope nMoldin g Centrifugal Castin g Continuou s laminatio n Continuou s Castin g Pultrusio n SM C Manufacturin g BMC/Mixin g Othe r facilitie s wer e no t

require dt o g o beyon dth e floor. Thes e facilitie s wer e projecte dt o b e abl e t o meet

MAC Tusin g pollutio npreventio n(lo w HA Pmaterials , andnon-atomize dspra y application ) Thi s proposal hada

nestimate demissio nreductio no f 14,50 0 TP Yfor

existin g facilities

. Th e overal l cos t

effectivenes s ofth e propose drul e was $2,10 0 per to nandth e incremental cos t effectivenes s wa s $1,50 0 pe r to nfor existin g facilitie s W e di dnot

g o above-the-floo r

for smaller facilitie s becaus e th e economi c impact s woul db e significant

. Planne d Majo rChange s fo rFina l Rul e

• Convert

t o us e o f unifiedemission s factors

. Thi s eliminate s havin g facilitie s dea l wit htw o set s o f equations

. On e t o determin e emission s andon e t o determin e complianc e wit h MACT

. Modif y floor level s o f contro l a s aresul t

o f comment s t o th e propose drul e (se e tables)

. Existin g facilitie s shoul dstill b e abl e t o mee t thes e level s withpollutio npreventio ncontro l techniques

. Limi t th e above-the-floo r

requirement s t o centrifugal casting , continuou s lamination , continuou s casting

. Change s inou r cos t algorithm s andth e floor

hav e resulte di

nane w incremental cos t

effectivenes s o f

wel l ove r $500 0 per

to nfor all process/produc t grouping s excep t

thes e three

. (Se e tables ) Where w e g o abov e th e floor , set th e threshol da s 100 tp y for bothlarg e andsmall businesses , rathe r

than100 tp y for

larg e businesse s an d25 0 tp y for small

. Ther e woul db e n o additional existin g small businesse s impacte db y settin g on e threshol drathe r the ntwo
. (Se e tabl e o f

centrifugal castin g an dcontinuou s lamination/castin g facilities ) Thi s change s th e emissio nreductio nt o approximatel y 8,30 0 tp y compare dt o 12,50 0 if w e kep t 

# 1

## P. 5 

# i
the above-the-floo

r optionwas unchange

dfromthe proposedrule

. However, basedo nthe cos t impacts we calculated , we decidedto not go above-the-floo

r except fo r centrifuga l casting , continuou s lamination , an

dcontinuou s casting

. Thes e three processe s produc e hig hconcentration emissio nstreams , an

dar e mor e cost-effective t o control

. I nthe cas e of

continuou s laminatio

n an dcontinuou s casting , the floo r leve l o f control requiredadd-oncontrols

.



# 4

### Summar yo fRegulator yOptio n Cos t Effectivenes s fo rth e Reinforce d Plasti c Composite s Sourc e Categor y

Existin g Source s -199 7 NOTE : Ad d Dat a fo rfacilitie s adde d t o th e databas e - - number s liste d i n tabl e t o th e righ t Cos t Effectivenes s Apri l 24-2002-Summary.xl s 

## 12/31/200 2



# U" ) Subcategor y Ope n Moldin g Proces s Manua l Resi n Applicatio n

Mechanica l Resi n Applicatio n

Filamen t Windin g Ge l Coa t Applicatio n

Total s fo rOpe n Moldin g Subcategor y Close d Moldin g Compression/Injectio n Moldin g Resi n Transfe rMoldin g (RTM ) Total s fo rClose d Moldin g Subcategor y Centrifuga l Castin g Centrifuga l Castin g Total s fo rCentrifuga l Castin g Subcategor y Continuou s Lamination/Castin g Polyme rCastin g Pultrusio n SM C Manufacturin g Cleanin g Operation s BMC/Mixin g Operation s Storag e o fHA P Containin g Mafl s Continuou s Lamination/Castin g Polyme rCastin g Pultrusio n SM C Manufacturin g Cleanin g Operation s BMC/Mixin g Operation s Storag e o fHA P Containin g Mafl s Total s fo rReinforce d Plasti cComposite s Sourc e Categor y Process/Produc t Groupin g Corrosion-Resistan t No n Corrosion-Resistan t Toolin g / Mol d Manufacturin g Corrosion-Resistan t No n Corrosion-Resistan t (Unfilled ) No n Corrosion-Resistan t (Filled ) Toolin g / Mol d Manufacturin g Corrosion-Resistan t No n Corrosion-Resistan t Pigmente d Productio n Clea rProductio n Toolin g / Mol d Manufacturin g Compression/Injectio n Moldin g Resi n Transfe rMoldin g (RTM )
Corrosion-Resistan t No n Corrosion-Resistan t
No t Applicabl e No t Applicabl e No t Applicabl e No t Applicabl e No t Applicabl e No t Applicabl e No t Applicabl e 

# I MAC TFloo r(Actual ) Tota l Reductio n (tpy ) 29. 6 61. 3 0. 8 474. 7 4291. 4 0. 0 48. 4 21. 2 0. 5 894. 7 74. 9 19. 2 5916. 7 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 3 12. 9 13. 2 358. 2 0. 0 127. 8 0. 0 807. 1 164. 2 0. 0 7387. 1 Annua l

Cos t (J/yr. ) $1,681,68 3 $722,49 2 $111,01 7 $1,465,34 7 $6,460,32 0 $ 0 $204,75 2 $862,77 6 $8,87 0 $5,695,41 7 $406,22 4 $698,36 7 $18,317,26 6 $55,85 2 $9,71 9 $65,57 1 $41,56 7 $43,40 1 $84,96 8 $600,76 1 $44,95 3 $312,74 6 $12,91 6 $367,32 2 $489,29 5 $324,09 2 $20,619,89 0 Reg

. Optio n w / Siz e Limi t (Actual ) Averag e Tota l Cos t Reductio n Effectivenes s (Srton ) (tpy ) $56,77 2 $11,78 5 $131,74 0 $3,08 7 $1,50 5 N/ A $4,23 1 $40,77 2 $17,52 0 $6,36 6 $5,42 5 $36,35 5 $3,09 6 N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A $3,35 7 $6,44 5 $1,67 7 N/ A $2,44 8 N/ A $45 5 $2,98 0 N/ A $2,79 1 29. 6

170. 3 20. 0 500. 4 6216. 7 0. 0 181. 7 21. 2 134. 2 2435. 0 192. 6 59. 0 9960. 6 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 3 748. 2 748. 5 576. 5 0. 0 131. 1 0. 0 807. 1 252. 2 0. 0 12476. 1 Annua l

Cos t (S/yr. ) $1,681,68 3 $1,745,13 0 $569,62 4 $1,902,80 6 $26,901,53 2

$ 0 $1,368,29 0 $862,77 6 $4,170,64 1 $12,378,93 6 $1,519,62 2 $960,28 5 $54,061,32 4 $55,85 2 $9,71 9 $65,57 1 $41,56 7 $358,04 2 $399,61 0 $1,161,82 9 $44,95 3 $589,11 7 $12,91 6 $367,68 5 $1,548,36 2 $324,45 5 $58,575,82 2 Averag e

Cos t (S/ton ) $56,77 2 $10,24 4 $28,54 0 $3,80 2 $4,32 7 N/ A $7,53 0 $40,77 2 $31,07 9 $5,08 4 $7,88 8 $16,28 8 $5,42 7 N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A

•$47 9 $53 4 $2,01 5 N/ A $4,49 3 N/ A $45 6 $6,14 0 N/ A $4,69 5 Regulator yOptio n 1 (Actual )

Tota l Reductio n (tpy ) 170. 3 445. 4 47. 4 761. 6 7603. 5 0. 0 334. 4 319. 8 152. 0 3432. 7 597. 1 109. 7 13973. 9 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 16. 5 881. 2 897. 7 678. 0 0. 0 258. 0 282. 5 807. 1 408. 2 0. 0 17305. 4 Annua l

Cos t (S/yr ) $6,220,61 8 $8,798,42 4 $3,090,52 0 $15,714,91 2 $72,315,78 1

$ 0 $6,600,45 9 $11,058,51 5 $4,974,21 5 $30,315,84 8 $13,381,94 1 $2,910,61 0 $175,381,84 4 $55,85 2 $9,71 9 $65,57 1 $278,77 7 $881,72 2 $1,160,49 9 $1,625,10 9 $44,95 3 $18,170,67 7 $5,312,11 2 $371,99 4 $13,618,27 6 $328,76 4 $216,079,79 8 Averag e

Cos t (S/ton ) $36,52 5 $19,75 2 $65,23 2 $20,63 4 $9,51 1 N/ A $19,73 8 $34,57 9 $32,71 5 $8,83 2 $22,41 3 $26,53 5 $12,55 1 N/ A N/ A N/ A $16,89 6 $1,00 1 $1,29 3 $2,39 7 N/ A $70,42 6 $18,80 1 $46 1 $33,36 0 N/ A $12,48 6
Not e 1 : Al l dollar s ar e 199 8 calenda ryea rdollars

.

### Summar yo fRegulator yOptio n Cos t Effectivenes s fo rth e Reinforce d Plasti c Composite s

Existin g Source s -199 7 NOTE : Ad d Dat a fo rfacilitie s adde d t o th e databas e - number s liste d i n tabl e t o th e righ t Cos t Effectivenes s Apri l 24-2002-Summary.xl s 

## 12/31/200 2

Subcategor y Ope n Moldin g Proces s Manua l Resi n Applicatio n

Mechanica l Resi n Applicatio n

Filamen t Windin g Ge l Coa t Applicatio n Process/Produc t Groupin g Corrosion-Resistan t No n Corrosion-Resistan t Toolin g / Mol d Manufacturin g Corrosion-Resistan t No n Corrosion-Resistan t (Unfilled ) No n Corrosion-Resistan t (Filled ) Toolin g / Mol d Manufacturin g Corrosion-Resistan t No n Corrosion-Resistan t Pigmente d Productio n Clea rProductio n Toolin g / Mol d Manufacturin g Total s fo rOpe n Moldin g Subcategor y Close d Moldin g Compression/Injectio n Moldin g Resi n Transfe rMoldin g (RTM ) Compression/Injectio n Moldin g Resi n Transfe rMoldin g (RTM ) Total s fo rClose d Moldin g Subcategor y Centrifuga l Castin g Centrifuga l Castin g Corrosion-Resistan t No n Corrosion-Resistan t Total s fo rCentrifuga l Castin g Subcategor y Continuou s Lamination/Castin g Polyme rCastin g Pultrusio n SM C Manufacturin g Cleanin g Operation s BMC/Mixin g Operation s Storag e o fHA P Containin g Mafl s Continuou s Lamination/Castin g Polyme rCastin g Pultrusio n SM C Manufacturin g Cleanin g Operation s BMC/Mixin g Operation s Storag e o fHA P Containin g Mafl s No t Applicabl e No t Applicabl e No t Applicabl e No t Applicabl e No t Applicabl e No t Applicabl e No t Applicabl e Total s fo rReinforced Plasti c Composite s Sourc e Categor y Reg

. Optio n w / Siz e Limi t (Incremental ) Tota l Reductio n (tpy) 0. 0 109. 0 19. 1 25. 8 1925. 3 0. 0 133. 3 0. 0 133. 7 1540. 2 117. 8 39. 7 4043. 9 0. 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 735. 3 735. 3 218. 3 0. 0 3. 4 0. 0 0. 0 88. 0 0. 0 5089. 0 Annual

Cos t (S/yr. ) $ 0 $1,022,63 7 $458,60 7 $437,46 0 $20,441,21 1

$ 0 $1,163,53 7 $ 0 $4,161,77 1 $6,683,51 8 $1,113,39 8 $261,91 8 $35,744,05 8

$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $314,64 1 $314,64 1 $561,06 8 $ 0 $276,37 1 $ 0 $36 3 $1,059,06 7 $36 3 $37,955,93 2 Averag e

Cos t ($/ton ) N/

A $9,37 8 $23,99 1 $16,98 6 $10,61 7 N/ A $8,72 7 N/ A $31,13 1 $4,33 9 $9,45 5 $6,58 9 $8,83 9 N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A $42 8 $42 8 $2,57 0 N/ A $82,28 9 N/ A N/ A $12,03 2 N/ A $7,45 8 Regulator yOptio n 1 (Incremental )

Tota l Reductio n (tpy ) 140. 7 384. 1 46. 5 286. 9 3312. 1 0. 0 286. 0 298. 6 151. 5 2538. 0 S22.2 90. 5 8057. 2 0. 0 0. 0 0 16. 2 868. 3 884. 5 319. 8 0. 0 130. 3 282. 5 0. 0 244. 1 0. 0 9918. 3 Annua l

Cos t (S/yr. ) $4,538,93 5 $8,075,93 2 $2,979,50 3 $14,249,56 6 $65,855,46 1

$ 0 $6,395,70 7 $10,195,73 9 $4,965,34 5 $24,620,43 1 $12,975,71 7 $2,212,24 3 $157,064,57 8

$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $237,21 0 $838,32 1 $1,075,53 1 $1,024,34 8

$ 0 $17,857,93 2 $5,299,19 6 $4,67 1 $13,128,98 1 $4,67 1 $195,459,90 8 Averag e Cos t (S/ton ) $32,26 2 $21,02 4 $64,02 8 $49,66 5 $19,88 3 N/ A $22,36 2 $34,14 1 $32,76 6 $9,70 1 $24,84 9 $24,45 1 $19,49 4 N/ A N/ A N/ A $14,60 2 $96 6 $1,21 6 $3,20 3 N/ A $137,09 8 $18,75 6 N/ A $53,79 6 N/ A $19,70 7
Not e 1 : Al l dollar s ar e 199 8 calenda ryea rdollars

.

## Summar yo f Cos t Effectivenes s fo rRecommende d Fina l Rul e fo rReinforce d Plasti cComposite s Sourc e Categ o

Existin g Source s



# -\ l Proces s Ope n Moldin g Close d Moldin g Centrifuga l Castin g Continuou s Lamination/Castin g

, Polyme rCastin g Pultrusio n SM C Manufacturin g

Cleanin g Operation s BMC/Mixin g Operation s Storag e o fHA P Containin g Mat'l s [Total s fo rSourc e Categor y Averag e impart s
tota l Reductio n toy*
5916. 7
0. 0
748. 5
576. 5
0. 0
127. 8
0. 0
807. 1
164. 2
0. 0
8340. 8 Annua l

Cos t (S/y M $18,317,26 6 $65,57 1 $399,61 0 $1,161,82 9 $44,95 3 $312,74 6 $12,91 6 $367,32 2 $489,29 5 $324,09 2 $21,495,60 0 cos t

Effectivenes s (Stout) $3,09 6 N/ A $53 4 $2,01 5 N/ A $2,44 8 N/ A $45 5 $2,98 0 N/ A incrementa l Impact s

Recommende d Rul e Compare d t o Floo r tota f Reductio n toy)
0. 0
0. 0
735. 3
218. 3
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0 $2,577 | 953. 6 Annua l Cos t <$/y*, > $ 0 $ 0 $314,64 1 $561,06 8 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $875,71 0 Cos t

Effectivenes s {S/ton *
N A

N A $42 8 $2,57 0
N A
N A
N A
N A
N A
N A $918 1
Not e 1 : Al l dollars ar e 199 8 calenda ryea rdollars

.

### Centrifuga l Castin g - C R DRAF T 12/31/200 2 CC-C L tables.xl s

Ran k 1 2 Corrosio n - Resistan t Centrifuga l Castin g (updated ) Importan t Notes : Th e averag e emissio n factor s use d i n thi s sprea d sheet to calculat e emission s shoul d not b e use d t o determin e o restimate actua l emission s at a specifi cfacility

. Afacility' s specifi cemission s show n i n thi s sprea d shee t ma ynot represen t th e facility' s actua l emission s an d shoul d therefore not b e used

. | Thi s databas e onl ycontain s facilitie s fo rwhic h th e Administrato rha s infonnation

. Othe rfacilitie s that shoul d b e par t o fthi s databas e ma

yexist

.

Plan t Nam e Fibercast Co

. Rave n industries

. Inc

. (Siou xFalls )

Projecte d Tota) (includin g assume d values) : Average : Filler/Resi n Ratio : Reinforcemen t to Resi n + Fille rRatio : (.eqen d Facilitie s tha t compris e MACTfloo r Existin g Sourc e MACTFloo r Assumed

values - no data provided Verifie d i n Teleco n Sit e Visi t Data Footnotes : Centifuga l Castin g Machine s 1 9 8 2 7 1 4 0.0 0 0.7 2 Resi n

(tpy t 37 2 4 6 417. 7 208. 9 Weighte d

Averag e % HA P i n neat resi n Dius ' 47. 0 49. 0

48. 0 FiDer

(tPV>° 1 0 1. 2 0. 6 Reinforce

.

(tor t 269. 1 32. 9 302. 0 151. 0 Scra p

(tpv) 38. 5 4. 7 43. 3 21. 6 (Exist TM Sourc e

Pre-MACT Emission s (tov) 4. 9 12. 5 17. 4 8. 7 Post-MACT

Emission s (tDV ) 4. 9 12. 2 17. 1 8. 6

a = Th e HA P percentage s are i n term s ofweigh t percen t an d the yar e base d o n th e HA P conten t ofth e neat resi n plu s an yHA P that i s adde d t o th e resi n a t th e facility(fillers not included)

. b = Fine rquantitie s fo rfadDtie s lha t indicate d fille rus e bu t di d not quantif yth e amoun t were determine d byusin g th e averag e finer/resi n rati o fro m fadDtie s wit h know n fille rquantities

. c= Poin t value s are expresse d i n pound s o fHA P pe rto n ofneat resi n plus

. I I lll l 1 Curren t Emission s (lbs/ton) c 2 6 54 7 N/ A N/ A Othe r Reductio n Technloue s Centr

. castin g 95 % control , filamen t wind , n o contro l

Non e



# ^

T l

### Centrifuga l Castin g - No n C R DRAF T 12/31/200 2 CC-C L tables.xl s



# -£> Ran k

1 2 3 4 5 6 Noncorrosio n - Resistan t Centrifuga l Castin g (updated ) Importan t Notes : Th e averag e emissio n factor s use d i n thi s sprea d shee t t o calculat e emission s shoul d no t b e use d t o determin e o restimat e actua l emission s at a specifi cfacility

. Afacility' s specifi cemission s show n i n thi s sprea d shee t ma yno t represen t th e facility' s actua l emission s an d shoul d therefor e no t b e used

. Thi s databas e onl ycontain s facilitie s fo rwhic h th e Administrato rha s information

. Othe rfacilitie s tha t shoul d b e par t o fthi s databas e ma

yexist

.

Plan t Nam e Dixie-Pacifi cManufacturin g Co

. Henderson , Blac k

& Green , Inc

. Sherma n Pole s Alte cIndustries , Inc

. (Midwes t Oper. ) Structura l Nort h Americ a Rave n Industries , Inc

. (Siou xFalls )

Projecte d Tota l (includin g assume d values) : Averag e Filler/Resi n Ratio : Reinforcemen t t o Resi n + Fille rRatio :
Legen d Facilitie s tha t compris e MAC Tfloo r Existin g Sourc e MACTFloo r Assume d value s - n o dat a provide d Verifie d i n Teleco n Footnotes : Centifuga l Castin g Machine s 3 1 1 0 1 9 1 4 1 8 8 3 1 4 0.0 3 0.8 5 Resi n

(tpv ) 129 8 39 3 248 7 23 3 2 1 4 6 4478. 5 746. 4 Weighte d

Averag e % HA P I n neat resi n plus * 35. 0 35. 5 37. 5 44. 5 45. 2 49. 0

41. 1 Fille r

(tPV ) ° 4 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 54. 1 9. 0 Reinforce

.

(tpv ) 1136. 9 344. 2 2112. 1 308. 5 8. 3 38. 8 3948. 8 658. 1 Scra p

(tpv ) 148. 6 45. 0 276. 0 32. 5 1. 8 5. 1 508. 9 84. 8 Existln q

Pre-MAC T Emission s (tpv ) 253. 5 77. 8 520. 5 57. 8 5. 4 12. 5 927. 6 154. 6 Sourc e

Post-MAC T Emission s (tpv ) 253. 5 77. 8 520. 5 48. 8 4. 5 9. 6 914. 6 152. 4

a « Th e HA P percentage s ar e i n term s ofweigh t percen t an d the yare base d o n th e HA P conten t ofth e nea t resi n plu s an yHA P tha t i s adde d t o th e resi n a t th e facility(filler s no t included)

. b = Fille rquantitie s fo rfacilitie s tha t indicate d fille rus e bu t di d no t quantifyth e amoun t wer e determine d b yusin g th e averag e filler/resi n ratio fro m facilitie s wit h know n fille rquantities

. c= Poin t value s ar e expresse d i n pound s ofHA P pe rto n ofnea t resi n plus

. | | lll l 1 Pre-MAC T Emission s (Ibs/tonl c 39 1 39 6 41 9 49 6 50 4 54 7 Othe r Reductio n Technique s Non e

### Continuou s Lamination/Continuou s Castin g DRAF T 

## 12/31/200 2 CC-C Ltables.xl s

Ran k 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 Continuou s Laminatio n / Continuou s Castin g (updated ] Importan t Notes : Th e emissio n estimate s use d i n thi s sprea d shee t shoul d no t b e use d t o determin e actua l emission s a t a specifi cfacility

. Afacility' s specifi cemission s show n i n thi s sprea d shee t ma yno t represen t th e facility' s actua l emission s an d shoul d therefor e no t b e used

. Thi s databas e onl ycontain s facilitie s fo rwhic h th e Administrato rha s information

. Othe rfacilitie s tha t shoul d b e part ofthi s databas e ar e likel yt o exist

.

Plan t Nam e Endur o Fiberglas s (formerl yW

. R

. Grace ) Cran e Kemlit e (Jonesbor o - formerl yB P Chemicals ) Internationa l Pape r(Nevamar ) W.H

. Brad yU.S.A

. Inc

. (Camero n Ave. ) Kalwal l Corp

. Tomkin s - LASC O Pane l Product s (KY ) Resolit e Sequentia , Inc

. (Gran d Junction ) Cran e Kemlit e (Joliet ) Glastee l Industria l Laminate s

Projecte d Tota l (includin g assume d values) : Averag e Filler/Resi n Ratio : Leaen d Facilitie s tha t compris e MAC Tfloo r Existin g Sourc e MAC TFloo r Assume d value s •n o dat a provide d Verifie d i n Teleco n Base d o n Permi t Informatio n Sit e Visi t Dat a Base d o n Paten t Informatio n Resi n ftPV ) 1235. 2 6250. 0 1872. 1 232, 5 3510. 0 13203. 2 1781. 3 12644. 9 16830. 0 1104. 0

58663. 1 5866. 3 #REF ! %HAP a

nea t resi n olu s 35. 5 38. 6 37. 8 33. 0 40. 5 42. 5 43. 2 43. 8 44. 0 51. 5

41. 0 

### Fille r°

(tpy ) #REF ! #REF l 3266. 2 0. 0 817. 8 3379. 6 311. 5 2803. 3 12436. 2 #REF I

#REF ! #REF I Se e rati o cal c belo w Reinforce

. (tpy ) 1095. 5 3498. 0 0. 0 50. 8 1278. 4 4260. 0 742. 1 5246. 3 9160. 6 0. 0
25,331. 7 2533. 2 Scra p

(tpv ) #REF ! #REF ! 532. 6 30. 7 595. 7 2216, 3 301. 3 2195. 9 4011, 0 #REF I

#REF ! #REF I Existin a Sourc e

Pre-MAC T Contro l Facto r 0.174 0 0.224 0 0.415 0 1.000 0 1.000 0 1.000 0 1.000 0 1.000 0 1.000 0 1.000 0 Post-MAC T

Contro l Facto r 0.174 0 0.224 0 0.415 0 0.415 0 0.492 9 0.564 7 0.415 0 0.415 0 1.000 0 0.415 0 Existin q Sourc e

Pre-MAC T Emission s (Controlled ) (tpy ) 3.8 2 21.6 2 12.7 4 36.0 6 56.2 6 191.2 3 42.6 7 282.4 9 23.6 7 60.0 5

730.6 1 73.0 6 Post-MAC T

Emission s (Controlled ) (tpv ) 3.8 2 21.6 2 12.7 4 14.9 6 27.7 3 107.9 9 17.7 1 117.2 3 23.6 7 24.9 2

372.4 0 37.2 4

a = Th e HA P percentage s ar e i n term s o fweigh t percen t an d the yar e base d o n th e HA P conten t o fth e nea t resi n plu s an yHA P tha t i s adde d t o th e resi n a t th e facilit y(filler s no t included)

. b = Fille rquantitie s fo rfacilitie s tha t indicate d fille rus e bu t di d no t quantif yth e amoun t wer e determine d b yusin g th e averag e filler/resi n rati o fro m facilitie s wit h know n fille rquantities

. Pre-MAC T Emission s (Uncontrolled ) (tpv ) 21.9 7 96.5 0 30.7 1 36.0 6 56.2 6 191.2 3 42.6 7 282.4 9 23.6 7 60.0 5

841.6 1 84.1 6

Th e filler/resi n rati o show n i s base d onl yo n facilitie s tha t conduc t continuou s lamination

. Fille rinformatio n fro m Internationa l Paper , a continuou s castin g facility , wa s no t used

. | Reductio n Technique s Therma l Oxidize r(83 % Overal l Control ) Therma l Oxidize r(78 % Overal l Control ) Condenser/Carbo n filter s (58.5 % Overal l Control ) Numbe r o fline s 1 2 2 1 1 3 1 4 3 1



# ^

## Compariso n o fMAC TFloor s fo rOpe n Moldin g - Propose d Rul e an d Fina l Rul e

Proces s Grou p Manua l Corrosio n Resistan t Manua l Noncorrosio n Resistan t Manua l Toolin g Mechanica l Noncorrosio n Resistan t Unfille d Mechanica l Noncorrosio n Resistan t Fille d Mechanica l Corrosio n Resistan t Mechanica l Toolin g
Filamen t Windin g - Corrosio n Resistan t Filamen t Windin g - Noncorrosio n Resistan t Ge l Coa t - Pigmente d Production-Whit e Ge l Coa t - Pigmente d Production-Non-Whit e Ge l Coa t - Clea rProductio n Ge l Coa t - Toolin g Propose d Rul e Floo r 12 3 8 7 12 2 8 6 12 6 15 9 25 4

17 1 18 8 26 7 37 7 52 2 39 8 Propose d Rul e

Maximu m Resi n HA P conten t (weigh t percent ) 40.0 0 33.6 0 39.9 0 3 8 nonatomize d 42. 8 nonatomize d 48. 3 nonatomize d 4 3 atomize d o r 55. 1 nonatomize d 42.0 0 45.0 0 30.0 0 37.0 0 44.0 0 38.0 0 Draf t Floo rfo r

Promulgate d Rul e 12 3 8 7 15 7 8 7 8 7 11 2 25 4

17 1 18 8 26 7 37 7 52 2 43 7 Draf t Promulgatio n

Maximu m Resi n HA P conten t (weigh t percent )

40.0 0 33.6 0 45.9 0 38. 4 nonatomize d 38. 4 nonatomize d 46. 2 nonatomize d 4 3 atomize d o r 91. 4 nonatomize d 42.0 0 45.0 0 30.0 0 37.0 0 44.0 0 40.0 0 Percen t

Chang e i n Allowabl e HA P 0.0 0 0.0 0

+ 6 +0. 4 -4. 4 -2. 1 Resi n HA P i s basicall y unlimite d fo rnonatomize d applicatio n 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
r 

## 0.0 0

+ 2

Al l floo rchange s resul t i n a mor e lenien t floo rexcep t fo rMechanica l Noncorrosio n Resistan t Fille d an d Mechanica l Corrosio n Resistant

. | W e believ e tha t facilitie s coul d stil l mee t th e floo rfo r Mechanica l Noncorrosio n Resistan t filled withou t add-o n controls , thoug h som e averagin g ma yb e required

.