alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-99 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, June 24, 1998)

NRC ORDER TO SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. CONFIRMS FIRE BARRIER

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AT HATCH 1 AND 2 NUCLEAR PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a confirmatory order to the Southern

Nuclear Operating Company confirming its commitment to complete Thermo-Lag fire barrier

corrective actions at its Edwin I. Hatch nuclear power plant Units 1 and 2 by the end of its next

refueling outage scheduled to begin this fall. The plants are located in Appling County,

Georgia.

In a letter to Southern Company officials, Sam Collins, Director of the NRC’s Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation, said the order was issued because of concern “that some

licensees may not be making adequate progress toward resolving the plant-specific issues, and

that some implementation schedules may either be too tenuous or too protracted.” The Hatch

plants are among them.

Thermo-Lag is a fire barrier material manufactured and supplied by Thermal Science,

Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, and has been used to provide fire resistance to wiring and

equipment at nuclear plants. The NRC has been concerned that Thermo-Lag 330-1 fire barrier

material installed by some of its licensees may not provide the intended level of fire protection

and that licensees thus may not be meeting regulatory requirements. Between 1992 and 1994,

the NRC staff issued letters to all nuclear utilities asking licensees to submit plans and

schedules for resolving the issue. All licensees with Thermo-Lag fire barriers have

implemented around-the-clock “fire watches,” using workers to patrol vital plant areas on a

regular basis to watch for signs of fire until corrective actions have been completed.

In his letter, Collins noted that NRC has been meeting with licensees to review their

progress in completing implementation of their fire barrier programs, but has been concerned

about slow progress on resolution of the issue at certain plants.
-2-

The Southern Nuclear Operating Company was one of the licensees with which NRC

has periodically held meetings. At these meetings, the NRC reviewed the company’s schedule

for Thermo-Lag corrective actions and concluded they are reasonable. The company formally

agreed June 2 to the terms of the confirmatory order.

About 20 other plants have received or are expected to receive similar orders in the

coming months.

##
§ 333.62 Compulsory process. ( a ) If a person refuses to permit a duly authorized representative of FEMA to have access to any premises or source of information necessary to the administration or enforcement of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, this part, or official actions, FEMA may seek compulsory process. Compulsory process means the institution of appropriate legal action, including *ex parte* application for an inspection warrant or its equivalent, in any forum of appropriate jurisdiction.
( b ) Compulsory process may be sought in advance of an audit, investigation, or other inquiry, if, in the judgment of the Administrator, in consultation with the FEMA Chief Counsel, there is reason to believe that a person will refuse to permit an audit, investigation, or other inquiry, or that other circumstances exist which make such process desirable or necessary.
§ 132.18 License for certain worsted wool fabric subject to tariff-rate quota. ( a ) *Requirement.* For worsted wool fabric that is entered under HTSUS subheading 9902.51.11 or 9902.51.12, the importer must possess a valid license, or a written authorization from the licensee, pursuant to regulations of the U.S. Department of Commerce (15 CFR 335.5), in order to claim the in-quota rate of duty on the worsted wool fabric at the time it is entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption. The importer must record the distinct and unique 9-character number for the license covering the worsted wool fabric on the entry summary or warehouse withdrawal for consumption (Customs Form 7501, column 34), or its electronic equivalent (see paragraph (c)(1) of this section).
( b ) *Importer certification.* By entering the worsted wool fabric under HTSUS subheading 9902.51.11 or 9902.51.12, the importer thus certifies that the worsted wool fabric is suitable for use in making suits, suit-type jackets, or trousers, as required under these subheadings.
( c ) *Validity of license* — ( 1 ) *License number.* To be valid, the license, or written authorization issued under the license and including its unique control number, must meet the requirements of 15 CFR 335.5, and with respect to the requirement in 15 CFR 335.5(a) that the license have a unique control number, the license must have a distinct and unique identifying number consisting of 9 characters comprised of the following three elements: ( i ) The first character must be a “W”;
( ii ) The second and third characters must consist of the last 2 digits of the calendar year for which the license is issued and during which it is in effect; and
( iii ) The final 6 characters represent the distinct and unique identifier assigned to the license by the Department of Commerce.
( 2 ) *Use of license.* A license covering worsted wool fabric that is entered under HTSUS subheading 9902.51.11 or 9902.51.12 is in effect, and may be used to obtain the applicable in-quota rate of duty for fabric that is entered or withdrawn for consumption, only during the specific calendar year (January 1—December 31, inclusive) for which the license is issued (see 15 CFR 335.2 and 335.5(b) and (d)).
( d ) *Retention and production of license or authorization to Customs.* The license and any written authorization from the licensee to the importer are subject to the recordkeeping requirements of part 163 of this chapter (19 CFR part 163). Specifically, the license and any written authorization must be retained for a period of 5 years in accordance with § 163.4(a) of this chapter, and must be made available to Customs upon request in accordance with § 163.6(a) of this chapter.
[T.D. 01-35, 66 FR 21666, May 1, 2001]
( PROFESSIONAL ) 

User Manual [v12) 

2015.06 
Appendix 

Specifications 

Aircraft 

• eig (B : ery & 

P opeiiE!fs lr.cludec:f) 1280g 

ax. Ascer1 Speed 5 s 

ax. Desce • Speed 

ax. Speeo 

ax. A:g :A : de 

ax. Rg : T 

empe J e 

G:lS ~ode 

G' bal 

Ceo: a eRcr e 

VISio Positioning 

Veloc. y =Gnge 

Ali ude ge 

A ge 

E . O"lf'AB 

Camera 

Se SOf 

les 

so 

:e Speed 

ax. S e 

S P o:cg p y ~ odes 

Supoorled SO Card T pes 

1deo ~ecao 

ax. B: ·eOf 

So age 

oeo 

3 s 

16 s (A I mode o 1 d) 

6000m 

A o m :ely23mi tes 

O"C o IIO"C 

GPSIGLO ASS 

c - oc:J> to + 30° 

< 8 mJs (2 above g o.Jno) 

30cm-300cm 

a e ed Sl. ces 

So"l}'EXMQq 123" E eel •e xes 12.4 

-o 94° 2{)nm(35mm or : eqJ a en ) f/2 8 

1 0-3200(video) 00- OOO(p o:o) 

8s- /8000s 

40COx3000 

Sng'es o: 

Bu s shoo:i g: 517 ' ames 

Au o ExfJOSl. •e B· eke g (AEB) 315 

B c e:ed ' ames a 0. 7EV Bias 

T' e-lapse 

c oSD 

ax ca city 64GB. Class 10o lJ-fS-1 a· ng eq •eo 

U 0 : 409Gx2 GOp 211/25 38110x2160p24!25/30 

= 0 1920x 080p 211/25130/118150100 

-10 1280x720 211/2513 49/5~60 

60 l ops 

Suppo· File Form :s ::lt.o o: 

1 eo: :;)II 

Ooe·a O"C o IIO"C 

2':11 llJl AI 

)> 

53 
GPS S.g"'al St ong • .... ·Blinking G ee"' 

lax ao1l.S 

GPS Slg"'al Weak 

ight u tiS 

hg 

tne 

·ngvellow 

Flig Limits 

No-Fly Zones 

(4) 

p. 

OJI Ptlotapp A aal Stat lndicato 

one. 

DJI otapp Ai aaft Status Indicator 

• at : Heig h II 

( ct:oo. G. 

, s in Ready 10 Ay (non-GPS) mode. it ' ly back 

S iC!OO .ton S ar<: S ICIOO AI ! d Zo CS. ; c/' 

ty LOC".es. a ''ar m.essag will appea: 

2:115 OJI 41 
'Tl 

Flight 

Once pr pr~rati:lO is~ • · is recorrmended I you use 1 smut or in DJt Piot 

10 hone your f and practice flyin fely. Ensure e carried ellA in n open 

a•ea 

Flight Environment Requirements 

Flight Limits and No-Fly Zones 

• nvnF AA .oe 

"0 20 SQJI AJ 

e metal sln.d ures m;ry ect the accuracy ot the on-

. a dboo• 

o• eloctro 9 :• . •t'Ct.Jdl 9 base st.a!Jons 

o t 'acto s c as a d S1ty a a 

9. 685 feet (&XX> m ers) above 
1640 

fee 

1 

Restricted Area 

42 2'J 5 DJI 

Airport 

-------------------------

p <oac CS Yilt I 0.6 

pp. 
Camera and Gimbal 

Camera Profile 

Camera Micro·SD Card Slot 

0 O'l. 

Camera Data Port 

T O'l lt'e ru to'l'l 3 Pro essJO '31 a d co oct a cabl o tne Came• a Da:a PCf. o do-1 load 

tos at'd .coos :o yo-.~ comp.. .e . 

~ -

3 
Remote Controller 

Remote Controller Profile 

Using the Remote Controller 

uming the Remote Controller On and Oft 

Ctwging e Remote Controller 

ect-argeable ba ! y al as a 

LEOs 01' ' { 01'1 paool. olbw 

once. T Ball ~ LEOs viii 

ng 

C r e the,, ·contrOller usi the included oharget. R er to the igt.l'e oo next pa e belalvlof more 

do 

:1'015 llJ1 AJ 23 

0 

(!) 

-
#### § 118.1 Definition.

A centralized examination station (CES) is a privately operated facility, not in the charge of a Customs officer, at which merchandise is made available to Customs officers for physical examination. A CES may be established in any port or any portion of a port, or any other area under the jurisdiction of a port director. To present outbound cargo for inspection at a CES at a port other than the shipment's designated port of exit, either proof of the shipper's consent to the inspection must be furnished or a complete set of transportation documents must accompany the shipment to evidence that exportation of the goods is imminent and that the goods are committed to export, thereby, making them subject to Customs examination.

[T.D. 93-6, 58 FR 5604, Jan. 22, 1993, as amended by T.D. 98-29, 63 FR 16684, Apr. 6, 1998]
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 593 

To restrict the imposition by the Secretary of Homeland Security of fines, 

penalties, duties, or tariffs applicable only to coastwise voyages, or prohibit otherwise qualified non-United States citizens from serving as crew, 

on specified vessels transporting passengers between the State of Washington and the State of Alaska, to address a Canadian cruise ship 

ban and the extraordinary impacts of the COVID–19 pandemic on Alaskan communities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 4, 2021 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself and Mr. SULLIVAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To restrict the imposition by the Secretary of Homeland 

Security of fines, penalties, duties, or tariffs applicable 

only to coastwise voyages, or prohibit otherwise qualified 

non-United States citizens from serving as crew, on specified vessels transporting passengers between the State 

of Washington and the State of Alaska, to address a 

Canadian cruise ship ban and the extraordinary impacts 

of the COVID–19 pandemic on Alaskan communities, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 593 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alaska Tourism Recov3 ery Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. VOYAGE DEEMED TO BE FOREIGN. 

5 (a) CRITERIA.—A roundtrip voyage transporting pas6 sengers between a port or place in the State of Alaska 

7 and a port or place in the State of Washington is deemed 

8 a foreign voyage for purposes of the law of the United 

9 States, if the voyage— 

10 (1) is made by a passenger vessel to which sec11 tions 3507 and 3508 of title 46, United State Code, 

12 apply; and 

13 (2) occurs during the period described in sub14 section (b). 

15 (b) DURATION OF APPLICABILITY.—A voyage 

16 deemed to be a foreign voyage under subsection (a) is a 

17 voyage which begins not later than any date prior to Feb18 ruary 28, 2022, on which the Government of Canada or 

19 its political subdivisions, or any port or province in Can20 ada, prohibits a passenger vessel to which sections 3507 

21 and 3508 of title 46, United State Code, apply from enter22 ing, berthing, or docking in Canadian waters of the Pacific 

23 Coast due to the COVID–19 pandemic. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
## HMF S 55 0	Air	Frame

Configuration: Hexacopter

Take	Off	Weight: 2.65 lbs

- 5.28 lbs

Diagonal	Width: 24.25 "

Motors: 6 x	DJI 2212 980 kv

ESC: DJI	15A	Opto

Landing	Gear: Retractable

Arms: High Strength Performance Engineered	Plastics

Propellers: 1038 Ca rbon	Fiber

Plug	Types: XT150	Flight	Battery,	XT60	Electronics

Flight	Control	System

DJI Naza	V2 ,IOSD	Mini	on	screen	display,	DJI	GPS	Puck.	LED	battery	low	V

warning/Satellite	indicator.

GPS	Waypoint	&	Mapping	system.

DJI	Datalink.	Provides	real	time	GPS coordinates	and	tracking	to	pilot	by	way	of	map.

RC	Controllers:

1	Fu t ab a	14	Sg	control ler ,	binded	for Pilot or	Camera	Operator

.

1	Futa ba	T8J	controller,	binded	for Pilot	or Camera	Operator.

A/V

Immersio nRC Uno5800 5.8Hz	A/V R x

Batteries

Turnigy 3 s 6 ,00 0

- 1 0 ,000 mAh	Lipo	25c

- 5 0c

Gimbal

Zenmuse H3

- 3d

Onboard	Equipment:

Gopro Hero	3+ Black

DJI	PC Ground	Station

ImmersionRC	600mW	5.8Hz	A/V	Tx

## Dji	S 90 0 Air	Frame

Configuration: Hexacopter

Take	Off	Weight: 10.36lbs

- 18.07lbs

Diagonal	Width: 38.375"

Mot ors: 6x	DJI	4114	400kv

ESC: 40A	Integrated

Landing	Gear: Retractable

Arms: Carbon	Fiber	Booms,	Foldable

Propellers: 1552	High	Performance,	Foldable

Plug	Types: XT150	Flight	Battery,	XT60	Electronics

Flight	Control	System

DJI	A2,IOSD	Mini	on	screen	d isplay,	DJI	GPS	Puck.	LED	battery	low	V	warning/Satellite

indicator.

GPS	Waypoint	&	Mapping	system.

DJI	Datalink.	Provides	real	time	GPS	coordinates	and	tracking	to	pilot	by	way	of	map.

RC	Controllers:

1	Futaba	14	Sg	control ler ,	binded	for	Pilot.

1	Futaba T8J	controller,	binded	for	Camera	Operator.	Communicates	R x

- T x via	DJI

Lightbridge	2.4GHZ	T x

.

Batteries

Turnigy	6s	8,000

- 16,000	mAh	Lipo	25c

- 50c

Gimbal

Zenmuse Z15

- GH3

Onboard Equipment:

Panasonic	DMC

- GH3KBODY	/ Olympus M.ZUIKO Digital ED 12mm f/2.0 Lens

Go pro	Hero	3+	Black

DJI	PC Ground	Station

DJI	Lightbridge	2.4GHz	(Camera	Operator	View)

## Dji T600 Inpsire Air	Frame

Configuration: Quad copter

Take	Off	Weight: 6. 47 lbs

Dimensions : 17.24 " x 17.76 ” x	11.85 ”

Motors: 4 x	DJI 3510 7 00kv

ESC: Integrated

Landing	Gear: Tilting

Arms: Carbon	Fiber	Booms, Tilting

Propellers: 1 345 High	Performance

Plug	Types: NA

Flight	Control	System

Internal	flight	control	system

GPS	Waypoint	&	Mapping	system.

DJI	Pilot	App

RC	Controllers:

1 Dji	C1 controller,	binded	for	Pilot. Communicates	Rx

- Tx	via	DJI	Lightbrigde Technology

1 Dji	C1 controller, binded	for	Camera	Operator.	Communicates	Rx

- Tx	via	DJI	Lightbridge

Technology

.

Batteries

Intelligent 6s 4,5 00

- 5,700	mAh	Lipo

Gimbal

Zenmuse X3

Onboard	Equipment:

DJI	X3

- FC350	Camera

Internal	vision	positioning	system	for	indoor	flight
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

      Certification Of Chief Executive Officer And Chief Financial Officer
               Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350 adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Alan D. Feldman, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:

     (i)  The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
          December 28, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
          amended; and
     (ii) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Midas, Inc.

/s/ Alan D. Feldman
-------------------
Alan D. Feldman
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Midas, Inc. and will be retained by Midas, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

I, William M. Guzik, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.(S) 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:

     (i)  The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
          December 28, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
          amended; and
     (ii) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Midas, Inc.

 /s/  William M. Guzik
----------------------
William M. Guzik
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Midas, Inc. and will be retained by Midas, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 122.4 English language required.

A translation in the English language shall be attached to the original and each copy of any form or document written or printed in a foreign language.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 05-12]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/OPS-ADMIN, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 05-12 with attached transmittal, policy justification, Sensitivity of Technology, and Section 620C(d).

Dated: October 8, 2004.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 61214)          ( print page 61215)          ( print page 61216)          ( print page 61217)          ( print page 61218)          ( print page 61219)          ( print page 61220)          ( print page 61221)          ( print page 61222)          ( print page 61223)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 04-23119 Filed 10-14-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 229

**Question 229:** Will the radiographers have to wipe test the sealed source upon receipt (10 CFR 20.1906 (b) (1)) even if the manufacturer has performed a recent leak test on the source?

**Answer:** The requirements of 20.1906 refer to the external surface of package, not the source itself; the requirement to wipe test a source is usually a license condition. If the source is not a gas or not in special form, the licensee is required to monitor the labeled package (White I, Yellow II or III) for contamination regardless of whether a leak test has been performed. If the source is in special form as defined in 10 CFR 71.4, the external surface of the package does not need to be monitored for contamination.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1906, 71.4)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 24, 2017
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20968 Conference Calendar

LOUIS HARVEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KATHY MAXEY; VELMA MONCADA; JOHN JETER, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CV-4196

-------------------- June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Louis Harvey, Texas prisoner # 653560, appeals from the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We review the dismissal of a prisoner's complaint as frivolous for abuse of discretion. See Berry v. Brady , 192 F.3d 504, 507 (5th Cir. 1999).No. 01-20968 -2- Harvey argues that during a hearing conducted pursuant to Spears v. McCotter , 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985), the district court denied him the appointment of counsel and entertained unsworn testimony from defense witnesses. We decline to review Harvey's appointment of counsel claim due to inadequate briefing. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). When conducting a Spears hearing, a district court must ensure that all evidence is authentic and reliable, and witnesses should be sworn. See Wilson v. Barrientos , 926 F.2d 480, 483 (5th Cir. 1991). The record before us is unclear as to whether the defense witnesses gave unsworn testimony or, as defendants claim, were sworn in at the beginning of the day's proceedings. Nevertheless, we conclude that Harvey's medical records support the district court's finding that the defendants were not deliberately indifferent and that any error was harmless. See Norton v. Dimazana , 122 F.3d 286, 292-93 (5th Cir. 1997); Banuelos v. McFarland , 41 F.3d 232, 234 (5th Cir. 1995); Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994). Harvey argues in his reply brief that the district court failed to give him an opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses at the Spears hearing. Because we do not consider claims raised for the first time in a reply brief, we do not address this issue. See United States v. Prince , 868 F.2d 1379, 1386 (5th Cir. 1989). AFFIRMED. ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS ARE DENIED.