alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>P067]


Territory of U.S. Virgin Islands

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration for 
Public Assistance on October 7, 2004 the U.S. Small Business 
Administration is activating its disaster loan program only for private 
non-profit organizations that provide essential services of a 
governmental nature. I find that the islands of St. Croix, St. John, 
and St. Thomas in the Territory of U.S. Virgin Islands constitute a 
disaster area due to damages caused by Tropical Storm Jeanne occurring 
on September 14-17, 2004. Applications for loans for physical damage as 
a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on 
December 6, 2004 at the address listed below or other locally announced 
locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 1 Office, 
360 Rainbow Blvd., South, 3rd Floor, Niagara Falls, NY 14303.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available               2.900.
   Elsewhere:................................................
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere:..     4.875.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is P06708.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59008.)

    Dated: October 13, 2004.
Cheri L. Cannon,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-23402 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 20-CIV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants,

REQUEST TO BE REMOVED FROM SERVICE LIST AS COUNSEL FOR 

BROADWAY ADVANCE, LLC

Fred A. Schwartz respectfully requests that this Court issue an Order 

removing from the electronic service list Fred A. Schwartz (“Schwartz”), who 

appeared in these proceedings to clarify a freeze order as counsel for Broadway 

Advance, LLC (“Broadway ”). In support thereof, the undersigned states as follows:

1. Schwartz appeared in this matter requesting a clarification as to whether funds 

held for his client, Broadway Advance, LLC (“Broadway”) by Actum 

Processing, was subject to freeze orders issued by the Court.

2. Predicated on an Order of the Court, Broadway and the Receiver exchanged 

certain documents. With the gracious cooperation of the counsel for the 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 392 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2020 Page 1 of 3
2

Receiver, it was jointly recommended to the Court that the funds were not 

subject to the freeze order.

3. Pursuant to a subsequent Order by the Court Actum has released the previous 

restrained funds.

4. Although Schwartz appreciates seeing how quickly the Court rules on 

Motions, often late at night, his assistant has complained about receiving five 

or more docket entries each day when our client no longer has an interest in 

this matter.

WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that the Court order the clerk to 

remove Schwartz from electronic the service list.

Respectfully submitted,

Shahady & Wurtenberger, P.A. 

By: /s/ Fred A. Schwartz

Fred A. Schwartz, Esq.

Bar # 360538

fschwartz@swlawyers.law

200 East Palmetto Park Rd. 

Suite 103

Boca Raton, FL 33432

(561) 910-3064

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 392 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2020 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November 16, 2020 I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Southern District of Florida.

/s/ Fred A. Schwartz

Fred A. Schwartz

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 392 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2020 Page 3 of 3
§ 12.104e Seizure and forfeiture. ( a ) Whenever any designated archaeological or ethnological material is imported into the U.S. in violation of 19 U.S.C. 2606, and the importer states in writing that he will not attempt to secure the certificate, documentation, or evidence, or the electronic equivalent, required by § 12.104c, or such certificate, documentation, or evidence, or the electronic equivalent, is not presented to the port director before the expiration of the time provided in § 12.104d, the material shall be seized and summarily forfeited to the U.S. in accordance with part 162 of this chapter. ( 1 ) Any designated archaeological or ethnological material which is forfeited to the U.S. shall, in accordance with the provisions of Title III of Pub. L. 97-446, 19 U.S.C. 2609(b): ( i ) First be offered for return to the State Party;
( ii ) If not returned to the State Party be returned to a claimant with respect to whom the designated material was forfeited if that claimant establishes— ( A ) Valid title to the material;
( B ) That the claimant is a bona fide purchaser for value of the material; or
( iii ) If not returned to the State Party under paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section or to a claimant under paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, be disposed of in the manner prescribed by law for articles forfeited for violation of the customs laws. No return of material may be made under paragraph (a)(1) (i) or (ii) of this section unless the State Party or claimant, as the case may be, bears the expenses incurred incident to the return and delivery, and complies with such other requirements relating to the return as the Secretary shall prescribe.
( b ) Whenever any stolen article of cultural property is imported into the U.S. in violation of 19 U.S.C. 2607, such cultural property shall be seized and forfeited to the U.S. in accordance with part 162 of this chapter. ( 1 ) Any stolen article of cultural property which is forfeited to the U.S. shall, in accordance with the provisions of Title III of Pub. L. 97-446, 2609(c): ( i ) First be offered for return to the State Party in whose territory is situated the institution referred to in 19 U.S.C. 2607 and shall be returned if that State Party bears the expenses incident to such return and delivery and complies with such other requirements relating to the return as the Secretary prescribes; or
( ii ) If not returned to such State Party, be disposed of in the manner prescribed by law for articles forfeited for violation of the customs laws.
[T.D. 86-52, 51 FR 6907, Feb. 27, 1986, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61285, Oct. 13, 2015]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStatistical correlation analysis for comparing vibration data from test and analysisA theory was developed to compare vibration modes obtained by NASTRAN analysis with those obtained experimentally. Because many more analytical modes can be obtained than experimental modes, the analytical set was treated as expansion functions for putting both sources in comparative form. The dimensional symmetry was developed for three general cases: nonsymmetric whole model compared with a nonsymmetric whole structural test, symmetric analytical portion compared with a symmetric experimental portion, and analytical symmetric portion with a whole experimental test. The theory was coded and a statistical correlation program was installed as a utility. The theory is established with small classical structures.Document ID19860015547Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsButler, T. G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Strang, R. F.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Purves, L. R.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Hershfeld, D. J.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1986Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberREPT-84B0561NASA-TM-86081NAS 1.15:86081Accession Number86N25018Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860015547.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
VIVENDI UNIVERSAL PUBLISHING

November 14, 2002


Mr. Gabriel Nassar, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Star E Media Corporation
27171 Burbank
Foothill Ranch, California  92610

Dear Mr. Nassar

This letter will confirm that as of this date and since November 1, 2002, STAR E
MEDIAL  CORPORATION,  a  Nevada  corporation  located at 27171 Burbank, Foothill
Ranch, California, is the sole and exclusive licensed entity for distribution of
the Knowledge Adventure educational products listed below, localized into Arabic
language.  The terms and conditions of Knowledge Adventure's license are subject
to  and  governed  by  the  terms  of  a  license agreement, entered into by the
parties.

1)     Jump Start Toddler
2)     Jump Start Preschool
3)     Jump Start Pre-K
4)     Jump Start Kindergarten
5)     Jump Start 1st Grade
6)     Jump Start 2nd Grade
7)     Jump Start 3rd Grade

Knowledge  Adventure,  Inc.  is  a  wholly-owned subsidiary of Vivendi Universal
Games,  and  owner  of  the  proprietary  products listed above. Accordingly, no
person,  company,  corporation  or  legal  entity  is  authorized  to duplicate,
localize and/or distribute any versions of the products listed above without the
prior  express permission of STAR E MEDIA CORPORATION for as long as our license
remains  in  effect.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Hubert Larenaudie
Hubert Larenaudie
Sr. VP & Director Asia Pacific


STATE OF CALIFORNIA      )
                         )    ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES    )

     On  the  12th  day  of  December 2002, before me, K. Wineke, Notary Public,
personally  appeared  Hubert Larenaudie, personally known to me to be the person
whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he
executed  the  same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the
instrument  the  person,  or  the  entity upon behalf of which the person acted,
executed  this  agreement.

                              WITNESS my hand and official seal

                              /s/ K. Wineke
                              ---------------------------------
### §300. Establishment of positions; payment from applicable accounts

The committee may authorize the establishment of additional positions of the kind to which this chapter applies, on a permanent basis or on a temporary basis of not to exceed six months' duration, whenever, in the judgment of the committee, such action is warranted in the interests of the orderly and efficient operation of the House of Representatives. The compensation of each such position may be paid out of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives until otherwise provided by law. An additional position of the kind to which this chapter applies shall not be established without authorization of the committee.

(Pub. L. 88–652, §11, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1083; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §209(3), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1743.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 88–652, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1079, known as the House Employees Position Classification Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 291 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "applicable accounts" for "contingent fund".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1965, see section 17 of Pub. L. 88–652, set out as a note under section 291 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.217 Verification and justification of claim for preferential treatment. ( a ) *Verification by CBP.* A claim for preferential treatment made under § 10.215, including any statements or other information contained on a Certificate of Origin submitted to CBP under § 10.216, will be subject to whatever verification the Center director deems necessary. In the event that the Center director for any reason is prevented from verifying the claim, the Center director may deny the claim for preferential treatment. A verification of a claim for preferential treatment may involve, but need not be limited to, a review of: ( 1 ) All records required to be made, kept, and made available to CBP by the importer or any other person under part 163 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Documentation and other information regarding the country of origin of an article and its constituent materials, including, but not limited to, production records, information relating to the place of production, the number and identification of the types of machinery used in production, and the number of workers employed in production; and
( 3 ) Evidence to document the use of U.S. materials in the production of the article in question, such as purchase orders, invoices, bills of lading and other shipping documents, and customs import and clearance documents.
( b ) *Importer requirements.* In order to make a claim for preferential treatment under § 10.215, the importer: ( 1 ) Must have records that explain how the importer came to the conclusion that the textile or apparel article qualifies for preferential treatment. Those records must include documents that support a claim that the article in question qualifies for preferential treatment because it is specifically described in one of the provisions under § 10.213(a). If the importer is claiming that the article incorporates fabric or yarn that originated or was wholly formed in the United States, the importer must have records that identify the U.S. producer of the fabric or yarn. A properly completed Certificate of Origin in the form set forth in § 10.214(b) is a record that would serve these purposes;
( 2 ) Must establish and implement internal controls which provide for the periodic review of the accuracy of the Certificate of Origin or other records referred to in paragraph (b)(1) of this section;
( 3 ) Must have shipping papers that show how the article moved from the beneficiary country to the United States. If the imported article was shipped through a country other than a beneficiary country and the invoices and other documents from the beneficiary country do not show the United States as the final destination, the importer also must have documentation that demonstrates that the conditions set forth in § 10.213(d)(3)(i) through (iii) were met; and
( 4 ) Must be prepared to explain, upon request from CBP, how the records and internal controls referred to in paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section justify the importer's claim for preferential treatment.
### PART I—SPORTING GOODS

Sec.
4161.
Imposition of tax.
4162.
Definitions; treatment of certain resales.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title X, §1015(d), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1019, added item 4162.
EXHIBIT 99.1

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity asan officer of Warwick Community Bancorp, Inc. (the "Registrant") that the Annual Report of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of theRegistrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant for such period.

| Date:   March 31, 2003 | /s/ Fred G. KowalFred G.KowalChairman and Chief Executive Officer                     |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:   March 31, 2003 | /s/ Arthur W. BudichArthur W. BudichSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
1

Brunner, Christine

From: Sargeant, Kathryn

Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 7:19 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad

Cc: Margo_schwab@omb.eop.gov

Subject: EPA Response to round 2 EO 12866 Comments on Tier 3 draft final rule (RIN 2060-AQ86)

Attachments: EPA_Response_EO12866_Comments on EPA_Tier 3 draft final rule - OMB2_2_14_

2014.docx

Chad, our response to the “round 2” comments are attached. 

The “round 2” comments are located in sections I.C, II, and VIII. We have responded to the “OMB2” comment bubbles 

within those comment bubbles. We created new comment bubbles to respond to the text edits. (As a result, the 

numbering of the comment bubbles has changed from your original document.) 

This document contains our responses only to the “round 2” comments. The one exception is our response to the 

comment bubble in section XII.A (labeled A33 in the first round of comments; it is now A84). That response was still 

pending in EPA’s 2/17 document that responded to the first round of comments. 

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

Jim asked me to send this directly to Margo, but I’m only guessing at her address. Will you please forward? Thanks so 

much. 

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 11:49 AM 

To: Sargeant, Kathryn 

Cc: Sutton, Tia; Yanca, Catherine 

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Comments on Tier 3 draft final rule (RIN 2060-AQ86) - round 2 

Kathryn, 

 Attached are additional EO 12866 comments on the Tier 3 draft final rule (RIN 2060-AQ86). The second round of 

comments were inserted in the document that I forwarded on Thursday (2/13) so this document has all comments that 

we’ve submitted to date on the preamble (not counting the summary comment document). The new comments can be 

identified with (1) comment bubbles starting with OMB2 and (2) comments found in section VIII (pages 434-451). 

Regards, 

Chad 

From: Whiteman, Chad 

Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 1:45 AM 

To: Sargeant, Kathryn (sargeant.kathryn@epa.gov) 

Subject: EO 12866 Comments on Tier 3 draft final rule (RIN 2060-AQ86) 

Kathryn, 

 Attached are some of the EO 12866 comments on the Tier 3 draft final rule (RIN 2060-AQ86). 

Regards, 

Chad
### §437b. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–187, title I, §105(1), Jan. 8, 1980, 93 Stat. 1354

Section, Pub. L. 92–225, title III, §308, formerly §309, as added Pub. L. 93–443, title II, §208(a), Oct. 15, 1974, 88 Stat. 1280; renumbered §308 and amended Pub. L. 94–283, title I, §§105, 106, 115(i), May 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 481, 496, set forth provisions respecting designation, etc., of campaign depositories.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 8, 1980, see section 301(a) of Pub. L. 96–187, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 30101 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John K. Henry, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Duane Reade Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended June 26, 2004;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation;

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  | August 5, 2004       |
|--------|----------------------|
|   |                 |   |
| By:    | /s/ John K. Henry    |   | Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |  John  K. Henry | (Principal Accounting  Officer) |
|        |                      |  |  |

 

----