alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12

FIRST REPUBLIC PREFERRED CAPITAL CORPORATION

(A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Merrill Lynch
Bank & Trust Co., FSB)

STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF

RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|                                                  |  |                    |        |                  |   |                  |  |   |       
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ------ | ---------------- | - | ---------------- |  | - | ------
|                                                  |  | For the Year Ended
|($ in thousands)                                  |  | December 26,2008   |        | December 28,2007 |   | December 31,2006
|I.       Earnings:                                |  |                    |        |                  |   |                  |  |   |       
|Net income                                        |  | $                  | 15,881 |                  | $ | 19,410           |  | $ | 18,456
|Fixed charges excluding preferred stock dividends |  |                    |       |                  |   |                 |  |   |      
|                                                  |  |                    |        |                  |   |                  |  |   |       
|Earnings before fixed charges                     |  | $                  | 15,881 |                  | $ | 19,410           |  | $ | 18,456
|                                                  |  |                    |        |                  |   |                  |  |   |       
|II.     Fixed charges:                            |  |                    |        |                  |   |                  |  |   |       
|Preferred stock dividends                         |  | $                  | 10,125 |                  | $ | 13,540           |  | $ | 14,252
|                                                  |  |                    |        |                  |   |                  |  |   |       
|III.    Ratios of earnings to fixed charges       |  |                    | 1.57x  |                  |   | 1.43x            |  |   | 1.30x 
|                                                  |  |                    |        |                  |   |                  |  |   |
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Andres Bustillo, M.D., Plaintiff,

v.

Twin City Fire Insurance Company, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-23133-Civ-Scola

Order of Dismissal

The Plaintiff has dismissed this case without prejudice consistent with

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (Not. of Dismissal, ECF No. 14.)

The Court directs the Clerk to close this case. All pending motions are denied 

as moot.

Done and ordered at Miami, Florida on September 2, 2020.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-23133-RNS Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/03/2020 Page 1 of 1
S. 5329 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two 

An Act 

To amend the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act to improve the 

program, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. BILL EMERSON GOOD SAMARITAN FOOD DONATION ACT. 

The Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act (42 

U.S.C. 1791) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (b)— 

(A) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘or is charged a 

good Samaritan reduced price’’ before the period at the 

end; 

(B) by redesignating paragraphs (6) through (10) as 

paragraphs (7) through (11), respectively; 

(C) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following: 

‘‘(6) GOOD SAMARITAN REDUCED PRICE.—The term ‘good 

Samaritan reduced price’ means, with respect to the price of 

an apparently wholesome food or apparently fit grocery product, 

a price that is an amount not greater than the cost of handling, 

administering, harvesting, processing, packaging, transporting, 

and distributing the apparently wholesome food or apparently 

fit grocery product.’’; and 

(D) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(12) QUALIFIED DIRECT DONOR.—The term ‘qualified direct 

donor’ means a retail grocer, wholesaler, agricultural producer, 

agricultural processor, agricultural distributor, restaurant, 

caterer, school food authority, or institution of higher education 

(as defined in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 

1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002)).’’; and 

(2) in subsection (c)— 

(A) in paragraphs (1) and (2), by inserting ‘‘at zero 

cost or at a good Samaritan reduced price’’ after ‘‘needy 

individuals’’ each place it appears; 

(B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); 

(C) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following: 
S. 5329—2 

‘‘(3) DIRECT DONATIONS TO NEEDY INDIVIDUALS.—A qualified 

direct donor shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability 

arising from the nature, age, packaging, or condition of apparently wholesome food or an apparently fit grocery product that 

the qualified direct donor donates in good faith to a needy 

individual at zero cost.’’; and 

(D) in paragraph (4) (as so redesignated), by striking 

‘‘and (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘, (2), and (3)’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Harry Davis v. Max Stitch.

Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 666.]
§ 302.1 Purpose. ( a ) The regulations in this part prescribe the requirements applicable to the Emergency Management Assistance (EMA) program for Federal financial contributions to the States, and through the States to their political subdivisions, for up to one half of the necessary and essential State and local civil defense personnel and administrative expenses, under section 205 of the Federal Civil Defense Act of 1950, as amended, and set forth the conditions under which such contributions will be made.
( b ) The intent of this program is to increase civil defense operational capability at the State and local levels of government by providing Federal financial assistance so that personnel and other resources can be made available for essential planning and other administrative functions and activities required in order to accomplish this objective.
-cr-06219-WDF Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2000 P
-cr-06219-WDF Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2000 P
-cr-06219-WDF Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2000 P
#### § 108.2007 Grant award to SSBICs.

An SSBIC selected for an Operational Assistance grant award will receive a grant award only if, by a date established by SBA, it increases its Regulatory Capital in the specific amount set forth in its application, pursuant to § 108.2004(a), and raises matching resources for the grant in the amount required by § 108.2030(d)(2).

[67 FR 68503, Nov. 12, 2002]
### §3201. Operations

#### (a) Operating plan

The provisions of the contract between the Secretary and an entity selected to operate a Job Corps center shall, at a minimum, serve as an operating plan for the Job Corps center.

#### (b) Additional information

The Secretary may require the operator, in order to remain eligible to operate the Job Corps center, to submit such additional information as the Secretary may require, which shall be considered part of the operating plan.

#### (c) Availability

The Secretary shall make the operating plan described in subsections (a) and (b), excluding any proprietary information, available to the public.

(Pub. L. 113–128, title I, §151, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1549.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-3544

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Calvin James Ferguson

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul

____________

 Submitted: May 30, 2013

Filed: May 31, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Calvin Ferguson appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. 1

§ 3582(c)(2) sentence-reduction motion based on Amendment 750 to the United

The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the

1

District of Minnesota.
States Sentencing Guidelines. We find no error in the district court’s finding that

Ferguson was not entitled to a reduction because he was responsible for more than

2.8 kilograms of crack cocaine, and thus the amendment did not lower his applicable

sentencing range. See United States v. Anderson, 707 F.3d 973, 975 (8th Cir. 2013)

(per curiam) (district court may make new factual findings under § 3582(c)(2) if they

are supported by record and consistent with original sentencing determination); cf.

United States v. Fetlow, 21 F.3d 243, 250 (8th Cir. 1994) (sentencing court may

consider evidence introduced at trial of codefendant if that evidence is relevant to

disputed issue atsentencing and sentencing judge presided over codefendant’s trial).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is

granted.

______________________________

-2-
#### Annie Hennessy, as Administratrix, Appellant, v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. , Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; Laughlin, J., dissented.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         779,534
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,241,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 10,801,245
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,571,276
<PP&E>                                      17,296,923
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,718,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,056,517
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,936
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,270,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,718,210
<SALES>                                     16,690,216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,690,216
<CGS>                                       14,020,278
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,020,278
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,908,623
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             222,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                553,152
<INCOME-TAX>                                   220,844
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            332,308
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   332,308
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
### §437f. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 437f was editorially reclassified as section 30108 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
### §2919. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–128, title V, §511(a), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1705

Section, Pub. L. 105–220, title I, §174, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1037; Pub. L. 107–210, div. A, title II, §203(c), Aug. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 969; Pub. L. 111–5, div. B, title I, §1899K(b), Feb. 17, 2009, 123 Stat. 435, related to authorization of appropriations for fiscal years 1999 through 2003.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3101 of this title.
#### § 61.9 Establishment of chargeable rates.

(a) Under section 1308 of the Act, we are establishing annual chargeable rates for each $100 of flood insurance coverage as follows for Pre-FIRM, A zone properties, Pre-FIRM, V-zone properties, and emergency program properties.

| Type of structure | A zone1 rates per year per $100 coverage on: | | | | V zone2 rates per year per $100 coverage on: | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| structure | | | Contents | Structure | | | Contents |
| RCBAP3 | | All other | RCBAP3 | | All other |
| High rise | Low rise | High rise | Low rise |
| 1. Residential: | | | | | | | | |
| No Basement or Enclosure | .85 | .70 | .76 | .96 | 1.08 | .93 | .99 | 1.23 |
| With Basement or Enclosure | .90 | .75 | .81 | .96 | 1.15 | 1.00 | 1.06 | 1.23 |
| 2. All other including hotels and motels with normal occupancy of less than 6 months duration: | | | | | | | | |
| No Basement or Enclosure | N/A | N/A | .83 | 1.62 | N/A | N/A | 1.10 | 2.14 |
| With Basement or Enclosure | N/A | N/A | .88 | 1.62 | N/A | N/A | 1.16 | 2.14 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 1 A zones are zones A1-A30, AE, AO, AH, and unnumbered A zones. | | | | | | | | |
| 2 V zones are zones V1-V30, VE, and unnumbered V zones. | | | | | | | | |
| 3 Residential Condominium Building Association Policies (RCBAP) are distinguished between High Rise (those structures that have 3 or more floors and 5 or more units) and Low Rise (those structures that have either less than 3 floors or less than 5 units). | | | | | | | | |

(b) We will charge rates for contents in pre-FIRM buildings according to the use of the building.

(c) A-zone rates for buildings without basements or enclosures apply uniformly to all buildings throughout emergency program communities.

(d) Properties that meet the definition of Severe Repetitive Loss properties as defined in [§ 79.2(g) of this subchapter](/on/2024-09-09/title-44/section-79.2#p-79.2(g)), and who refuse an offer of mitigation pursuant to [§ 79.7 of this subchapter](/on/2024-09-09/title-44/section-79.7) are not eligible for the rates identified in [paragraphs (a)](/on/2024-09-09/title-44/section-61.9#p-61.9(a)) through [(c)](/on/2024-09-09/title-44/section-61.9#p-61.9(c)) of this section.

(e) Properties leased from the Federal Government and located either on the river-facing side of a dike, levee, or other riverine flood control structure, or seaward of any seawall or other coastal flood control structure are not eligible for the rates identified in [paragraphs (a)](/on/2024-09-09/title-44/section-61.9#p-61.9(a)) through [(c)](/on/2024-09-09/title-44/section-61.9#p-61.9(c)) of this section.

[[64 FR 13116](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/64-FR-13116), Mar. 17, 1999, as amended at [67 FR 8905](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/67-FR-8905), Feb. 27, 2002; [68 FR 15668](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/68-FR-15668), Apr. 1, 2003; [72 FR 61737](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/72-FR-61737), Oct. 31, 2007]
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 84

**Question 84:**Can a female worker legally declare pregnancy if she does not yet have documented medical proof?

**Answer:** Yes. The revised Part 20 does not require awoman to have "documented medical proof" of pregnancy before declaring pregnancy.

(References: 10 CFR 20.1003, 10 CFR 20.1208).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, December 13, 2017
Exhibit
32(a)





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, OF THE


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rocky Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mike
Brooks, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Mike BrooksMike
      Brooks, Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerAugust
      3, 2010
#### Frederick G. Quern, Appellant, v. George F. Haggerty, Respondent.

Action on a bond. The action was commenced in September, 1944. The defendant appeared in the action by counsel but did not answer and judgment by default was entered on Hovember 3, 1944, and a copy of the judgment, with notice of entry, was served on the attorneys appearing for the defendant. In Hovember, 1947, defendant moved to set aside and vacate the judgment and for permission to serve an answer, on the ground that he did not learn until January, 1947, that the judgment had been entered by default. The motion was granted and plaintiff appeals. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs. The record discloses no reason for granting the motion and no adequate excuse for failure to make the motion until three years after the entry of the judgment. The granting of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. Lewis, P. J;, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur. [See 274 App. Div. 816.]
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-96-75 December 24, 1996

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $5,000 FINE AGAINST CLEVELAND CLINIC

FOR VIOLATIONS OF NRC SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $5,000 fine

against Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, for deliberately failing

to provide required radiation safety training for its employees and for

failing to conduct an annual audit of the radiation safety program.

NRC is taking this action based on the findings of NRC's Office of

Investigations (OI) and NRC inspectors. The investigation was conducted in May

of this year based on information obtained during an NRC inspection in March.

Inspectors and investigators found that while both the Cleveland

Clinic's former Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) and Radioisotope and Radiation

Safety Committee (RRSC) knew that NRC required annual training of the clinic's

radiation workers, such training had not been performed since 1993.

Additionally, the RSO and clinic management knew that a radiation safety

program audit was required annually, but did not perform an audit in 1995.

"These violations occurred because the resources available to the

(clinic's) Director of Quality Management and the former RSO were not

adequate, and the available resources were used to manage more pressing safety

significant issues in your licensed program," said NRC Regional Administrator

A. Bill Beach in his letter informing Cleveland Clinic Foundation of the

proposed fine. "After the RSO brought the non-compliances and the resource

issue to the attention of the RRSC, the violations continued with the

knowledge of the full RRSC. Deliberate violations are of concern because the

NRC's regulatory programs are based on licensees and their employees acting

with integrity."

In response to NRC inspection findings, Cleveland Clinic in April

conducted training sessions for its radiation workers and in July hired an

independent contractor to perform the radiation safety program audit.

The March inspection also identified a violation involving securing

radioactive materials from improper access. Due to extensive corrective

actions taken by the clinic, no fine was proposed.

Cleveland Clinic has until January 19 to pay the fine or to protest it.

If the fine is protested and subsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the

company may request a hearing.

####
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsGraphics applications utilizing parallel processingThe results are presented of research conducted to develop a parallel graphic application algorithm to depict the numerical solution of the 1-D wave equation, the vibrating string. The research was conducted on a Flexible Flex/32 multiprocessor and a Sequent Balance 21000 multiprocessor. The wave equation is implemented using the finite difference method. The synchronization issues that arose from the parallel implementation and the strategies used to alleviate the effects of the synchronization overhead are discussed.Document ID19900017218Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsRice, John R.*(Purdue Univ. West Lafayette, IN, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 23, 1990Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186719NASA-CR-186719Accession Number90N26534Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-789Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017218.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024