### 79660 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 251 / Tuesday, December 31, 2013 / Notices

suggested methods for complying with the requirements in 9 CFR parts 55 and
81.

During the October 2012 U.S. Animal Health Association meeting, a resolution was passed asking APHIS to work with cervid industry stakeholders to revise the CWD Program Standards. Accordingly, we convened a group of State, laboratory, and industry representatives to receive their input on potential revisions. The group met from November 2012 to June 2013 to completely review the CWD Program Standards. The revised draft, which is based on those discussions, is intended to provide more detailed guidance to States and herd owners who are seeking to participate in the Federal CWD herd certification program. As we believe the collaborative process has been helpful in revising the CWD Program Standards, we plan to work with State, laboratory, and industry representatives to review the standards at least once a year.

The new draft of the CWD Program Standards can be viewed at the CWD Web site, http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ animal

_health/animal

_ diseases/cwd/

, or on Regulations.gov (see the
**ADDRESSES** section earlier in this document for instructions on how to access Regulations.gov).

We welcome public comment on this notice and the proposed revisions to the CWD Program Standards. After considering all comments, if no substantive changes to the CWD Program Standards are deemed necessary by the APHIS Administrator, the revised CWD Program Standards will be adopted as final 30 days after the close of the comment period for this notice. If substantive changes are deemed necessary, we will publish an additional document in the Federal Register to discuss them; otherwise, the final version of the revised CWD Program Standards will be announced and made available on the CWD Web site.

Done in Washington, DC, this 20th day of December 2013. Kevin Shea, Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–31143 Filed 12–30–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–34–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE** 

**Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service** 
**[Docket No. APHIS–2013–0047]**
**Enhancing Agricultural Coexistence; Extension of Comment Period** 

**ACTION :**  Notice; extension of comment period.

**SUMMARY :**  We are extending the comment period for a request for information soliciting comments on ways to foster communication and collaboration among those involved in diverse agricultural production systems in order to further agricultural coexistence. This action will allow interested persons additional time to prepare and submit comments.

**DATES :**  The comment period for the notice published on November 4, 2013 (78 FR 65960) is extended. We will consider all comments that we receive on or before March 4, 2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments by either of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov/ #!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2013-0047-
0001.

• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to Docket No. APHIS–2013–0047, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.

Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may be viewed at http:// www.regulations.gov/ #!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2013-0047 or in our reading room, which is located in Room 1141 of the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call (202) 799–7039 before coming.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Ms. Meghan Klingel, Acting Advisor for State and Stakeholder Relations, Office of the Deputy Administrator, LPA, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 51, Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 851– 4055, email: meghan.k.klingel@ aphis.usda.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On November 4, 2013, we published in the Federal Register (78 FR 65960–65962, Docket No. APHIS–2013–0047) a notice seeking comment on how the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) can best foster communication and collaboration among those involved in diverse agricultural systems on the topic of coexistence as well as how USDA can best communicate and collaborate with those entities.

Comments on the notice were required to be received on or before January 3, 2014. We are extending the comment period on Docket No. APHIS– 2013–0047 for an additional 60 days. This action will allow interested persons additional time to prepare and submit comments.

Done in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of December 2013. Kevin Shea, Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–31192 Filed 12–30–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–34–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE**

**Food and Nutrition Service**

**Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;**  **Comment Request—Child Nutrition Database** 

**AGENCY :**  Food and Nutrition Service, USDA.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment on this proposed information collection. This is an extension, without change, of a currently approved collection. This collection is the voluntary submission of data including nutrient data from the food service industry to update and expand the Child Nutrition Database in support of the Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act.

**DATES :**  Written comments on this notice must be received by March 3, 2014 to be assured of consideration.

**ADDRESSES :**  Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological