alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fw Vinyl Institute Estimate of Direct Economic Impact of Proposed PVC MACT Rule

From: Richard Krock <rkrock@vinylinfo.org>

To: Jodi Howard/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Penny Lassiter/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Pete r Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Allen Blakey <ablakey@vinylinfo.org>, "Richard M. Doyle" <ddoyle@vinylinfo.org>

Date: 10/27/2011 03:22 PM

Subject: Vinyl Institute Estimate of Direct Econ omic Impact of Proposed PVC MACT Rule

Dear Ms. Howard,

The attached document delineates a recently completed est imate of direct costs that was referred to in part in our August 2, 2011 comme nts as further consideration for EPA’s economic impact on the PVC Industry from the PVC MACT rule as proposed. This is being submitted t o further clarify the Agency’s understanding of the fuller impacts o n the resin producers and their downstream customer base if the rule i s promulgated as proposed.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or additional information regarding this estimate. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this important information to EPA.

Sincerely,

Richard Krock

Richard Krock Technical Director

The Vinyl Institute 1737 King Street Suite 390 Page 1Fw Vinyl Institute Estimate of Direct Economic Impact of Proposed PVC MACT Rule

Alexandria, VA 22314 Direct: 571.970.3392 Mobile: 571.216.4474 Fax: 571.970.3271 Email: rkrock@vinylinfo.org http://www.vinylinfo.org http://www.vinylindesign.com(See attached file: VI PVC MACT Dirct Economic Impact Estimate for EPA 10-27-11.pdf)

Page 2
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.819 Goods eligible for tariff preference claims. The following goods are eligible for a TPL claim filed under § 10.818 of this subpart (subject to the quantitative limitations set forth in U.S. Note 13, Subchapter XIV, Chapter 99, HTSUS): ( a ) Cotton or man-made fiber fabric goods provided for in Chapters 52, 54, 55, 58, and 60 of the HTSUS that are wholly formed in the territory of Bahrain from yarn produced or obtained outside the territory of Bahrain or the United States;
( b ) Cotton or man-made fiber fabric goods provided for in subheadings 5801.21, 5801.22, 5801.23, 5801.24, 5801.25, 5801.26, 5801.31, 5801.32, 5801.33, 5801.34, 5801.35, 5801.36, 5802.11, 5802.19, 5802.20, 5802.30, 5803.10, 5803.90.30, 5804.10.10, 5804.21, 5804.29.10, 5804.30, 5805.00.30, 5805.00.40, 5806.10.10, 5806.10.24, 5806.10.28, 5806.20, 5806.31, 5806.32, 5807.10.05, 5807.10.20, 5807.90.05, 5807.90.20, 5808.10.40, 5808.10.70, 5808.90, 5809.00, 5810.10, 5810.91, 5810.92, 5811.00.20, 5811.00.30, 6001.10, 6001.21, 6001.22, 6001.91, 6001.92, 6002.40, 6002.90, 6003.20, 6003.30, 6003.40, 6004.10, 6004.90, 6005.21, 6005.22, 6005.23, 6005.24, 6005.31, 6005.32, 6005.33, 6005.34, 6005.41, 6005.42, 6005.43, 6005.44, 6006.21, 6006.22, 6006.23, 6006.24, 6006.31, 6006.32, 6006.33, 6006.34, 6006.41, 6006.42, 6006.43, and 6006.44 of the HTSUS that are wholly formed in the territory of Bahrain from yarn spun in the territory of Bahrain or the United States from fiber produced or obtained outside the territory of Bahrain or the United States;
( c ) Cotton or man-made fiber apparel goods provided for in Chapters 61 or 62 of the HTSUS that are cut or knit to shape, or both, and sewn or otherwise assembled in the territory of Bahrain from fabric or yarn produced or obtained outside the territory of Bahrain or the United States; and
( d ) Cotton or man-made fiber made-up goods provided for in Chapter 63 of the HTSUS that are cut or knit to shape, or both, and sewn or otherwise assembled in the territory of Bahrain from fabric wholly formed in Bahrain or the United States from yarn produced or obtained outside the territory of Bahrain or the United States.
#### § 296.37 Confidentiality of information.

Confidential information submitted by individual claimants is protected from disclosure to the extent permitted by the Privacy Act. These protections are described in the Privacy Act Notice provided with the Notice of Loss. Other claimants should consult with FEMA concerning the availability of confidentiality protection under exemptions to the Freedom of Information Act and other applicable laws before submitting confidential, proprietary or trade secret information.
#### § 111.79 Employment of broker who has lost license.

Five years after the revocation or cancellation “with prejudice” of a license, the ex-broker may petition the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade for authorization to assist, or accept employment with, a broker. The petition will not be approved unless the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade is satisfied that the petitioner has refrained from all activities described in § 111.42 and that the petitioner's conduct has been exemplary during the period of disability. The appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade will also give consideration to the gravity of the misconduct which gave rise to the petitioner's disability. In any case in which the misconduct led to pecuniary loss to the Government or to any person, the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade will also take into account whether the petitioner has made restitution of that loss.

[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63321, Oct. 18, 2022]
### [§1465. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(a)(156), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1789]

Section, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 360, defined withholding agent.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1976, see section 1901(d) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as an Effective Date of 1976 Amendment note under section 2 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.910 Borrower contributions. ( a ) The Borrower must contribute to the Project cash (or property acceptable to SBA obtained with the cash) or land (that is part of the Project Property), in an amount equal to the following percentage of the Project cost, excluding administrative costs: ( 1 ) At least 15 percent, if the Borrower (or Operating Company if the Borrower is an Eligible Passive Company) has operated for two years or less;
( 2 ) At least 15 percent, if the Project involves the acquisition, construction, conversion, or expansion of a limited or single purpose building or structure;
( 3 ) At least 20 percent, if the Project involves conditions described in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section; or
( 4 ) At least 10 percent, in all other circumstances.
( b ) The source of the contribution may be a CDC or any other source except an SBA business loan program (see § 120.913 for SBIC exception).
[64 FR 2118, Jan. 13, 1999]
#### § 6.50 Submission of requests to amend records.

An individual who desires to amend any record containing personal information about the individual should direct a written request to the system manager specified in the pertinent Federal Register notice concerning FEMA's systems of records. A current FEMA employee who desires to amend personnel records should submit a written request to the Director, Human Capital Division, Washington, DC 20472. Each request should include evidence of and justification for the need to amend the pertinent record. Each request should bear the legend “Privacy Act—Request to Amend Record” prominently marked on both the face of the request letter and the envelope.
Exhibit 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 20-CV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.

Defendants.

______________________________________/

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING RECEIVER, RYAN K. STUMPHAUZER’S 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE, AND FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED 

PAGE LIMITATION ON, MOTION TO ESTABLISH AND APPROVE: (1) PROOF 

OF CLAIM FORM; (2) CLAIMS BAR DATE AND NOTICE PROCEDURES;

AND (3) PROCEDURE TO ADMINISTER AND DETERMINE CLAIMS

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Receiver, Ryan K. Stumphauzer’s 

(“Receiver”) Motion for Extension of Time to File, and for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation on, 

Motion to Establish and Approve: (1) Proof of Claim Form; (2) Claims Bar Date and Notice 

Procedures; and (3) Procedure to Administer and Determine Claims (the “Motion”) [ECF No. 

_____].

Having reviewed the Motion and being otherwise duly advised, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED. The deadline for the 

Receiver to file the Motion to Establish and Approve: (1) Proof of Claim Form; (2) Claims Bar 

Date and Notice Procedures; and (3) Procedure to Administer and Determine Claims is extended 

to Wednesday, December 21, 2022. Further, the Receiver is authorized to file a 25-page Motion 

to Establish and Approve: (1) Proof of Claim Form; (2) Claims Bar Date and Notice Procedures;

and (3) Procedure to Administer and Determine Claims. 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1463-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/16/2022 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this _____ day of December, 2022.

________________________________

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: Counsel of record

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1463-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/16/2022 Page 2 of 2
### §1411. Effect of failure to issue regulations

In any proceeding under section 1405, 1406, 1407, or 1408 of this title, except a proceeding to enforce section 1351 of this title with respect to offices listed under section 1351(e)(2) of this title, if the Board has not issued a regulation on a matter for which this chapter requires a regulation to be issued, the hearing officer, Board, or court, as the case may be, shall apply, to the extent necessary and appropriate, the most relevant substantive executive agency regulation promulgated to implement the statutory provision at issue in the proceeding.

(Pub. L. 104–1, title IV, §411, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 37.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–1, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 3, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1301 of this title and Tables.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.618 Issuance of negative origin determinations. If, as a result of an origin verification initiated under this subpart, CBP determines that a claim for preferential tariff treatment made under § 10.583(b) of this subpart should be denied, it will issue a determination in writing or via an authorized electronic data interchange system to the importer that sets forth the following: ( a ) A description of the good that was the subject of the verification together with the identifying numbers and dates of the import documents pertaining to the good;
( b ) A statement setting forth the findings of fact made in connection with the verification and upon which the determination is based; and
( c ) With specific reference to the rules applicable to originating goods as set forth in General Note 29, HTSUS, and in §§ 10.593 through 10.605 of this subpart, the legal basis for the determination.
### Cannot redisplay /tmp/21066165-0--70677.pdf, it has already been shown once.
#### John A. Connolly, Appellant, v. William Church Osborn, Respondent.

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
NO. 07-10-0057-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D AUGUST 16, 2010

RUSSELL WADE HANEY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________________________ FROM THE 46TH DISTRICT CO URT OF WILBARGER COUNTY; NO. 11,333; HONORABLE DA N MIKE BIRD, PRESIDING

Memorandum Opinion

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Russell Wade Haney appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance (cocaine) in an amount of less than one gram. In doing so, he claims the evidence is factually insufficient to sustain the conviction. We overrule the issue and affirm the judgment. We review appellant’s chall enge under the standar d espoused in Watson v. State, 204 S.W.3d 404 (Tex. Crim. A pp. 2006) and its progeny. And, in doing so, we note that appellant does not attempt to disp ute the evidence that he rode his bicycle into2 an alley known for its drug sale s, met with someone therein, hurriedly rode out of the alley, extended his left hand from the bike an d opened it when told to stop by the police,

and informed various of the officers that he had bought “two rocks” and dropped “two rocks.” Also undisputed by appe llant is the evidence illustra ting that the officers found

two “rocks” of cocaine at the locale whereat appellant was seen opening his hand. This data is not too weak to enable a rational jury to deduce, beyond reasonable doubt, that appellant possessed the cocaine found by the police. Nor would such a deduction be manifestly unjust. As for appellant’s insinuati on that the State failed to prove that he knew the “rocks” were cocaine, we do recall a time when it was rather fashionable to buy and possess items of geologic creati on. But, owning or possessing igneous, sedimentary, or like creations was not unlawful, as fa r as we know. So, one can only wonder why appellant would buy “rocks” in an alley and abandon them when confronted by the police if he did not know them to be cont raband. Indeed, the ac t of abandonment itself

could be characterized as an inst ance of consciousness of guilt. See Davis v. State, 862 S.W.2d 817, 819 (Tex. App.–Beaumont 1993, no pet.) (describing the concept). And, we find nothing wrong with a jury so interpreting the circumstances. Accordingly, the j udgment is affirmed.

Brian Quinn Chief Justice Do not publish.
### [§§2324, 2325. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–584, §7, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1918]

Section 2324, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 970, related to power of court to restrain or suspend operation of orders of Interstate Commerce Commission pending final hearing and determination of action.

Section 2325, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 970, related to requirement of a three judge district court to hear and determine interlocutory or permanent injunctions restraining enforcement, operation or execution of orders of Interstate Commerce Commission.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to actions commenced on or before last day of first month beginning after Jan. 2, 1975, and actions to enjoin or suspend orders of Interstate Commerce Commission which are pending when this repeal becomes effective shall not be affected thereby, but shall proceed to final disposition under the law existing on the date they were commenced, see section 10 of Pub. L. 93–584, set out as an Effective Date of 1975 Amendment note under section 2321 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 141

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 141.103 Amount to be deposited.

Estimated duties shall be deposited in an amount to sufficiently cover the prospective duties on each item being entered or withdrawn.

[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17447, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 99-64, 64 FR 43266, Aug. 10, 1999]
#### § 354.1 Purpose.

This part establishes the methodology for FEMA to assess and collect user fees from Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensees of commercial nuclear power plants to recover at least 100 percent of the amounts that we anticipate to obligate for our Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program as authorized under Title III, Public Law 105-276, 112 Stat. 2461, 2502. Public Law 105-276 established in the Treasury a Radiological Emergency Preparedness Fund, to be available under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2011 et. seq.), and under Executive Order 12657 (3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 611), for offsite radiological emergency planning, preparedness, and response. Beginning in fiscal year 1999 and thereafter, the Administrator of FEMA must publish fees to be assessed and collected, applicable to persons subject to FEMA's radiological emergency preparedness regulations. The methodology for assessment and collection of fees must be fair and equitable and must reflect the full amount of costs of providing radiological emergency planning, preparedness, response and associated services. Our assessment of fees include our costs for use of agency resources for classes of regulated persons and our administrative costs to collect the fees. Licensees deposit fees by electronic transfer into the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Fund in the U.S. Treasury as offsetting collections.
### §1931. Additional compensation for employees with specialty assignments and proficiencies

#### (a) Establishment of positions

The Chief of the Capitol Police may establish and determine, from time to time, positions in salary classes of employees of the Capitol Police to be designated as employees with specialty assignments or proficiencies, based on the experience, education, training, or other appropriate factors required to carry out the duties of such employees.

#### (b) Additional compensation

In addition to the regularly scheduled rate of basic pay, each employee holding a position designated under this section shall receive an amount determined by the Chief, except that—

(1) such amount may not exceed 25 percent of the employee's annual rate of basic pay; and

(2) such amount may not be paid in a calendar year to the extent that, when added to the total basic pay paid or payable to such employee for service performed in the year, such amount would cause the total to exceed the annual rate of basic pay payable for level II of the Executive Schedule, as of the end of such year.

#### (c) Manner of payment

The additional compensation authorized by this subsection shall be paid to an employee in a manner determined by the Chief or his designee except when the employee ceases to be assigned to the specialty assignment or ceases to maintain the required proficiency. The loss of such additional compensation shall not constitute an adverse action for any purpose.

#### (d) Determination not appealable or reviewable

Any determination under section 1 (a) shall not be appealable or reviewable in any manner.

(Pub. L. 108–7, div. H, title I, §1011, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 360.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Level II of the Executive Schedule, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is set out in section 5313 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Codification

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2003, which is div. H of Pub. L. 108–7.

1 So in original. Probably should be "subsection".
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23523]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--NAHB Research Center, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), NAHB Research Center, Inc. 
(``NAHB'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: NAHB Research 
Center, Inc., Upper Marlboro, MD. The nature and scope of NAHB's 
standards development activities are: To develop and publish consensus 
standards--including products, construction materials and systems, 
technology, and methodologies that facilitate commerce--in response to 
needs for performance and prescriptive standards for use in single-
family and multi-family housing.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23523 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```
### AGENDA

TFI meeting with EPA to discuss RTR for Phosphoric Acid and Phosphate Fertilizer

NESHAPs

September 11 , 2014

1:00pm Introductions

1:10pm Hydrogen Fluoride Testing Results, retaining Total Fluoride as the surrogate

1:30pm Addressing Startup and Shutdown

1:50pm Work Practice Standards for Phosphogypsum Stacks and Ponds

2:10pm Schedule for Rule Completion

2:20pm Other Business

2: 35 pm Next Steps

### Attendees:

Last First Company

Grussing Jeff Agrium

Burton Scott Hunton & Williams

Foster Wade TFI

O'Hare Andy TFI

Leason Chris Gallagher &

Kennedy

Reesman Chelly Simplot

Jellerson David Mosaic

Smith Ross PCS

George Judith PCS

Taylor Randy URS

Wehlan Chuck Jones Day

Koogler John Koogler & Assoc
#### § 360.5 General provisions for State Cooperative Agreement.

The legal funding instrument for the State Assistance Program for Training and Education FEMA is the State Cooperative Agreement. All States will be required to comply with FEMA General Provisions for the State Cooperative Agreement. The General Provisions for the State Cooperative Agreement will be provided to the States as part of the Request for Application package. The General Provisions will become part of the Cooperative Agreement.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-7   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 1 of 1
### §2131. National Statuary Hall

Suitable structures and railings shall be erected in the old hall of Representatives for the reception and protection of statuary, and the same shall be under the supervision and direction of the Architect of the Capitol. And the President is authorized to invite all the States to provide and furnish statues, in marble or bronze, not exceeding two in number for each State, of deceased persons who have been citizens thereof, and illustrious for their historic renown or for distinguished civic or military services, such as each State may deem to be worthy of this national commemoration; and when so furnished, the same shall be placed in the old hall of the House of Representatives, in the Capitol of the United States, which is set apart, or so much thereof as may be necessary, as a national statuary hall for the purpose herein indicated.

(R.S. §1814; Aug. 15, 1876, ch. 287, 19 Stat. 147.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 187 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

R.S. §1814 derived from act July 2, 1864, ch. 210, §2, 13 Stat. 347.

Section 2 of act July 2, 1864, gave the supervision and direction of the National Statuary Hall to the Commissioner of Public Buildings.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Change of name of Architect of the Capitol, functions abolished, transferred, etc., by prior acts, see Prior Provisions and Change of Name notes set out under former section 1801 of this title.
### §109. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 109 was editorially reclassified as section 4104 of this title.