alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.1**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Werner Wenning, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Bayer AG; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company andhave:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the company, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by theannual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: May 24, 2004
/s/WERNERWENNING
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.54 Gobelin and other hand-woven tapestries.

Pursuant to subheading 5805.00.10, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, Gobelin tapestries produced in the Manufacture Nationale des Gobelins factories at Paris and Beauvais under the direction and control of the French Government, and other hand-woven tapestries, shall be accorded free entry if of a kind fit only for use as wall hangings, and valued over $215 per square meter.

[28 FR 14663, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 87-75, 52 FR 20066, May 29, 1987; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51250, Dec. 21, 1988]
----

----

I Mededelingen

Commissie

----

Wisselkoersen van de euro (1)

12 januari 2006

(2006/C 8/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Bron: door de Europese Centrale Bank gepubliceerde referentiekoers.

----

----

Informatieprocedure — Technische regels

(2006/C 8/02)

(Voor de EER relevante tekst)

Richtlijn 98/34/EG van het Europees Parlement en de Raad van 22 juni 1998 betreffende een informatieprocedure op het gebied van normen en technische voorschriften en regels betreffende de diensten van de informatiemaatschappij (PB L 204 van 21.7.1998, blz. 37; PB L 217 van 5.8.1998, blz. 20).

Door de Commissie ontvangen kennisgevingen van nationale voorstellen van technische regels

De Commissie vestigt de aandacht op het arrest „CIA Security” van 30 april 1996 in zaak C-194/94 (Jur. 1996, blz. I-2201), waarin het Hof van Justitie een interpretatie van de artikelen 8 en 9 van Richtlijn 98/34/EG (voorheen 83/189/EEG) geeft die inhoudt dat derden zich erop kunnen beroepen bij de nationale rechter; deze dient de toepassing van een niet overeenkomstig de richtlijn aangemeld nationaal technisch voorschrift te weigeren.

Met dit arrest wordt de mededeling van de Commissie van 1 oktober 1986 (PB C 245 van 1.10.1986, blz. 4) bevestigd.

Het feit dat niet aan de verplichting tot kennisgeving is voldaan, impliceert dus dat de desbetreffende technische voorschriften niet kunnen worden toegepast jegens derden.

Voor meer informatie over de notificatieprocedure kan contact worden opgenomen met:

Zie ook de website http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/tris/

Voor eventuele inlichtingen over deze kennisgevingen kunt u terecht bij de nationale diensten waarvan de lijst hieronder is gepubliceerd:

LIJST VAN DE NATIONALE INSTANTIES DIE BELAST ZIJN MET HET BEHEER VAN RICHTLIJN 98/34/EG

BELGIË

TSJECHISCHE REPUBLIEK

DENEMARKEN

DUITSLAND

ESTLAND

GRIEKENLAND

SPANJE

FRANKRIJK

IERLAND

ITALIË

CYPRUS

LETLAND

LITOUWEN

LUXEMBURG

HONGARIJE

MALTA

NEDERLAND

OOSTENRIJK

POLEN

PORTUGAL

SLOVENIË

SLOWAKIJE

FINLAND

ZWEDEN

VERENIGD KONINKRIJK

Toezichthoudende Autoriteit van de EVA

TURKIJE

----

(1)  Jaar — registratienummer — kennisgevende lidstaat.

(2)  Periode tijdens dewelke een ontwerp niet mag worden goedgekeurd.

(3)  Geen standstill-termijn omdat de Commissie de motivering inzake de urgentie heeft aanvaard.

(4)  Geen standstill-termijn, want het betreft hier technische specificaties of andere eisen of regels betreffende diensten die vergezeld gaan van fiscale of financiële maatregelen in de zin van artikel 1, punt 11, tweede alinea, derde streepje, van Richtlijn 98/34/EG.

(5)  Informatieprocedure stopgezet.

----

----

Mededeling van de Commissie in het kader van de uitvoering van Richtlijn 98/79/EG

(2006/C 8/03)

(Voor de EER relevante tekst)

(Bekendmaking van titels en referentienummers van geharmoniseerde normen in het kader van de richtlijn)

----
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE       INTERIORBUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT       Alaska Campbell Tract trail map Return to Campbell Tract recreation       homepage.
#### § 360.1 Purpose.

The Emergency Management Training Program is designed to enhance the States' emergency management training program to increase State capabilities and those of local governments in this field, as well as to give States the opportunity to develop new capabilities and techniques. The Program is an ongoing intergovernmental endeavor which combines financial and human resources to fill the unique training needs of local government, State emergency staffs and State agencies, as well as the general public. States will have the opportunity to develop, implement and evaluate various approaches to accomplish FEMA emergency objectives as well as goals and objectives of their own. The intended result is an enhanced capability to protect lives and property through planning, mitigation, operational skill, and rapid response in case of disaster or attack on this country.
EXHIBIT 10.3

British Columbia

Ministry of Employment and Investment

Energy and Minerals Division

Mineral Titles Branch

Mineral Tenure Act

Section 57 and 58

BILL OF SALE ABSOLUTE

INDICATE TYPE OF TITLE:Mineral

MINING DIVISION:Slocan

SELLER:

I, Clive de Larrabeiti, of South Lodge, Pax Hill Park, Lindfield, West Sussex, U.K., RH16 2QY

PURCHASER:

Mayfair Mining & Minerals, Inc. of South Lodge, Pax Hill Park, Lindfield, West Sussex, U.K., RH16 2QY

For and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) paid to me, do hereby sell the interest as specified below in the following minerals titles:

	
Claim Name or Lease Type
	
Tenure Number
	
Percentage of Title Being Sold

	
Silver Stone 1
	
301217
	
100%

	
Silver Stone 2
	
301218
	
100%

	
Silver Stone 3
	
301225
	
100%

	
Silver Stone 4
	
301226
	
100%

	
Silver Stone 5
	
301227
	
100%

	
Silver Stone 6
	
301228
	
100%




I declare that I have good title to these tenures and every right to sell the same, in witness whereof, I have today signed my legal name.

October 9, 2002 

	
/s/ "Clive de Larrabeiti"
	
/s/ B.M. de Larrabeiti

	
Clive de Larrabeiti
	
Witness
§ 12.125 Notice of exportation. Whenever the Administrator directs the port director to refuse entry under § 12.123 and the importer exports the non-complying shipment within the 30 day period of notice of refusal of entry or within 90 days of demand for redelivery, the importer must submit notice of the exportation either in writing to the port director or electronically to ACE or any other CBP-authorized EDI system. The importer must include the following information in the notice of exportation: ( a ) The name and address of the exporter or his agent;
( b ) A description of the covered commodity exported;
( c ) The destination (country);
( d ) The port of arrival at the destination;
( e ) The carrier;
( f ) The date of exportation; and
( g ) The bill of lading or the air way bill number.
[T.D. 83-158, 48 FR 34739, Aug. 1, 1983, as amended by CBP Dec. 16-28, 81 FR 94986, Dec. 27, 2016]
No: 23-075 November 16, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Makes Available Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal Application

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has made available an application from Pacific Gas 

& Electric to renew the operating licenses for Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, in 

Avila Beach, California. 

PG&E filed on Nov. 7 an application seeking to renew the licenses for an additional 

20 years of operation. Diablo Canyon’s pressurized-water reactors, about 12 miles southwest of 

San Luis Obispo, are currently licensed to operate through Nov. 2, 2024, for Unit 1 and through 

Aug. 26, 2025, for Unit 2. 

The NRC staff is reviewing the application to determine if it is sufficiently complete to 

begin the agency’s extensive safety and environmental reviews. If the application is determined 

to be complete, the staff will docket it and publish a notice of opportunity to request an 

adjudicatory hearing before the NRC’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board. The reactors’ 

licenses will then remain valid, under an exemption from agency regulations, until the agency’s 

review is complete.

Information about the license renewal process is available on the NRC website. A copy 

of the Diablo Canyon license renewal application will be available at the San Luis Obispo 

Library, 995 Palm St. in San Luis Obispo.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-92 August 3, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT INDIAN POINT 2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has selected Jennifer G. England as

the new resident inspector at the Indian Point 2 nuclear plant in Buchanan, NY. She

joins Senior Resident Inspector Robert Temps and resident inspector Scott Schwind at

the site.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors.

They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections,

monitoring major work projects and interfacing with plant workers and the public.

Mrs. England joined the NRC’s Region I office in 1997 as a reactor engineer in

the Division of Reactor Projects.

Before joining the agency, Mrs. England worked for Lockheed Martin at Knolls

Atomic Power Laboratory in Schenectady, NY, as a thermal hydraulic engineer and a

nuclear plant engineer for the S8G naval nuclear prototype and reactor safeguards

systems. Mrs. England has a Bachelor of Science degree in chemical engineering from

Rutgers University. She lives with her husband and son in Northvale, NJ.

The Indian Point 2 resident inspectors can be reached at 914/739-9360.

#
### §168. Constitution of the United States; preparation and publication of revised edition; annotations; supplements; decennial editions and supplements

The Librarian of Congress shall have prepared—

(1) a hardbound revised edition of the Constitution of the United States of America—Analysis and Interpretation, published as Senate Document Numbered 39, Eighty-eighth Congress (referred to hereinafter as the "Constitution Annotated"), which shall contain annotations of decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States through the end of the October 1971 term of the Supreme Court, construing provisions of the Constitution;

(2) upon the completion of each of the October 1973, October 1975, October 1977, and October 1979 terms of the Supreme Court, a cumulative pocket-part supplement to the hardbound revised edition of the Constitution Annotated prepared pursuant to clause (1), which shall contain cumulative annotations of all such decisions rendered by the Supreme Court after the end of the October 1971 term;

(3) upon the completion of the October 1981 term of the Supreme Court, and upon the completion of each tenth October term of the Supreme Court thereafter, a hardbound decennial revised edition of the Constitution Annotated, which shall contain annotations of all decisions theretofore rendered by the Supreme Court construing provisions of the Constitution; and

(4) upon the completion of the October 1983 term of the Supreme Court, and upon the completion of each subsequent October term of the Supreme Court beginning in an odd-numbered year (the final digit of which is not a 1), a cumulative pocket-part supplement to the most recent hardbound decennial revised edition of the Constitution Annotated, which shall contain cumulative annotations of all such decisions rendered by the Supreme Court which were not included in that hardbound decennial revised edition of the Constitution Annotated.

(Pub. L. 91–589, §1, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1586.)
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-0 7 -00 005 -CV
P hili p Ro be r t T e r r ane lla , A ppe lla nt

v . Chaoyueh Kent , Appellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- F M- 06- 0027 60 , HO NORAB LE SUZ ANNE COVINGTO N , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Appellant Phili p Robert Terr anella a nd appellee Chaoy

ueh Ke nt have f

iled an agree d motion to dismiss the appeal. The parties have agree d that costs are to be paid by the par ty incurring same. We grant the motion and dismiss the appea l. Tex. R . App. P. 42.1.

W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and He nson Dismissed on Ag ree d Motion Filed: May

3, 2007
#### CSK AUTO, INC., Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee, v. DAVEL COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation; Telaleasing Enterprises, Inc., an Illinois corporation, Defendants-counter-claimants—Appellants.

No. 00-17348.

D.C. No. CV-00-00624-EHC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 14, 2002.

Decided May 17, 2002.

*552Before HAWKINS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,* Judge.

*

 The Honorable Jane A. Restani, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Relying on plain language, the district court properly determined that the choice of law and forum selection clause in the parties’ agreement that it would be governed by “the laws of the State of Arizona, and its courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any matters arising out of this Agreement” did not permit a diversity action brought in the courts of the United States sitting in Arizona. The remand to state court was, therefore, entirely appropriate.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilberto VASQUEZ-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-50734.

D.C. No. CR-00-02034-JNK.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 24, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gilberto Vasquez-Lopez appeals the 15-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Vasquez-Lopez contends that 21 U.S.C. § 841 is facially unconstitutional under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). This argument is foreclosed by *United States v. Buckland,*289 F.3d 558, 2002 WL 857751 (9th Cir. May 7, 2002) (en banc). Vasquez-Lopez also contends that under *Apprendi,*the government is required to prove drug type and quantity beyond a reasonable doubt. We recently rejected this argument in *United States v. Carranza,*289 F.3d 634, -, at *7, 2002 WL 841175 (9th Cir. May 3, 2002) (holding that *Apprendi*does not change the “long established rule” that the government need only show that the defendant knew he imported or possessed some controlled substance).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[No. 6997.

Decided January 9, 1908.]

#### Christina McLean, *Respondent,*v. Lesette E. Lester *et al., Appellants.*
      *1*

Taxation — Foreclosure • — • Summons — Suittciency. Upon, the foreclosure of a tax certificate, a summons by publication which fails to state the year of the date of the first publication is too indefinite and uncertain to authorize a judgment of default.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered February 9, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the *214court without a jury, in an action to vacate a tax judgment.

Affirmed.

*William C. Keith,*for appellants.

*Ira A. Campbell,*for respondent.

Reported in 93 Pac. 208.

Mount, J.

This action was brought by the respondent to set aside a judgment foreclosing a delinquent tax certificate and also a tax deed based thereon. Upon a trial a judgment was entered as prayed for in the complaint. The defendants appeal..

It is necessary to notice but one of the questions presented, because upon that question alone the judgment appealed from must be affirmed. It appears that, in the proceedings to foreclose the delinquent tax certificate, service was attempted to be made upon the defendants by publication. No other service was made. The summons as published in that case notified the defendants “to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication, to wit, within sixty days after the 23d day of December, in the above named court, and defend this action or pay the amount due, together with costs, and in case of your failure so to do the plaintiff will apply for a judgment foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against the real property above described. G. W. Tracie, plaintiff. Daniel Lamson, attorney for plaintiff. Room 9 Roxwell Block, City. First publication December 23, — 7t.” Upon this summons a judgment of default was entered, and the lot in question sold. The summons did not state the year when the defendants in that action were required to appear. Under repeated rulings of this court this summons was too indefinite and uncertain to base a judgment of default upon. *Owen v. Owen,*41 Wash. 642, 84 Pac. 606, and cases there cited.

Appellants argue that the date of the newspaper and the fact that the certificate of delinquency was issued in the year Í904, are sufficient to make the summons definite. The date *215of the newspaper is no part of the summons, nor does the fact that the certificate of delinquency was issued in the year 1904 necessarily show that the case was brought in that year. The summons itself should state the time within which the defendants were required to appear. It did not do so, and was therefore insufficient.

The judgment appealed from must therefore be affirmed.

Hadley, C. J., Fullerton, and Crow, JJ., concur.

Dunbar and Root, JJ., took no part..
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,359.05

 2,358.78

 2,358.48

 2,358.15

 2,357.80

 2,357.43

 2,357.12

 2,356.87

 2,356.63

 2,356.28

 2,355.95

 2,355.66

 2,355.39

 2,355.11

 2,354.90

 2,354.61

 2,354.36

 2,354.20

 2,353.96

 2,353.77

 2,353.55

 2,353.32

 2,353.09

 2,352.84

 2,352.56

 2,352.29

 2,351.97

 2,351.66

 2,351.30

 2,351.00

 2,350.57

 2,272.3

 2,268.1

 2,263.4

 2,258.3

 2,252.9

 2,247.2

 2,242.4

 2,238.6

 2,234.9

 2,229.5

 2,224.4

 2,219.9

 2,215.8

 2,211.5

 2,208.3

 2,203.8

 2,200.0

 2,197.6

 2,193.9

 2,191.0

 2,187.7

 2,184.2

 2,180.7

 2,176.9

 2,172.6

 2,168.5

 2,163.6

 2,159.0

 2,153.5

 2,149.0

 2,142.5

STORAGE

-4.8

-4.2

-4.7

-5.1

-5.4

-5.7

-4.8

-3.9

-3.7

-5.4

-5.1

-4.5

-4.1

-4.3

-3.2

-4.4

-3.8

-2.4

-3.7

-2.9

-3.4

-3.5

-3.5

-3.8

-4.3

-4.1

-4.9

-4.7

-5.4

-4.5

-6.5

CHANGE

1,994

2,051

1,847

1,578

1,281

1,104

1,376

1,509

1,680

1,232

1,092

877

1,256

1,069

1,158

1,086

1,121

1,019

745

1,091

787

927

1,155

687

933

746

587

309

-188

50

-55

INFLOW

 3,873

 3,833

 3,655

 3,598

 3,709

 3,860

 3,668

 3,358

 3,416

 3,827

 3,491

 2,977

 3,210

 3,095

 2,631

 3,177

 2,922

 2,113

 2,450

 2,385

 2,325

 2,663

 2,774

 2,455

 2,920

 2,679

 2,867

 2,518

 2,389

 2,178

 3,080

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 402

 184

 414

 414

 167

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 43

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 151

 146

 123

 146

 136

 127

 123

 95

 127

 122

 118

 144

 135

 140

 149

 144

 126

 139

 144

 166

 152

 31

 148

 148

 156

 134

 169

 156

 169

 160

 133

C.F.S.

 .33

 .32

 .27

 .32

 .30

 .28

 .27

 .21

 .28

 .27

 .26

 .32

 .30

 .31

 .33

 .32

 .28

 .31

 .32

 .37

 .34

 .07

 .33

 .33

 .35

 .30

 .38

 .35

 .38

 .36

 .30

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2006 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 19, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -134.7 32,104 94,096 0 1,624 4,257 9.46 .00

ACRE-FEET -134,700 63,678 186,639 0 3,221 8,444

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 186,639

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 3,221

 189,860

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2006 .00

 2,277.1

Table 4

(1) (1)
#### In the Matter of Ocean Beach Ferry Corporation et al., Respondents, against Incorporated Village of Ocean Beach, Suffolk County, et al., Appellants.

In our opinion the decision of the Court of Appeals in *Matter of Ocean Beach Ferry Corp.*v. *Incorporated Vil. of Ocean Beach*(298 N. Y. 30) is not determinative of the question here presented. Holán, P.. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 782.]