alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
/ 

SERVED: DECEMBER 17, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MAGORIEN HONING & HYDRAULICS 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

FDMS FAA-2012-0908 

ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

The Order to Show Cause of November 28, 2012 ("OSC") is hereby VACATED. 

Respondent Magorien Honing & Hydraulics ("Respondent") has filed pleadings dated November 

8 and 28, 2012, warranting this outcome. · 

Richard 

e~Qc.~ C. Goodwin · A 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

I 3 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0001 

Neel Viradia, General Manager 

Magorien Honing & Hydraulics, Respondent 

1212 South Vail Avenue 

Montebello, CA 90640 

TEL: 323-723-1151 

FAJ<: 323-888-1154 

Email: www.magorien.com 

Doug Griffith, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Office of Doug Griffith 

633 W. 5th St., SE 2800 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

TEL: 213-223-2092 

FAJ<: 213-814-4530 

Email: doug@douggriffithlaw.com 

ONE COPY 

Michael F. McKinley, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office ofthe.ChiefCounsel 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-7100 

FAJ<: 202-267-5106 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Staff Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0908 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WlOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
#### § 353.5 Average cost per FEMA professional staff-hour.

Fees for FEMA services rendered will be calculated based upon the costs for such services using a professional staff rate per hour equivalent to the sum of the average cost to the agency of maintaining a professional staff member performing site-specific services related to the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program, including salary, benefits, administrative support, travel and overhead. This rate will be charged when FEMA performs such services as: Development of exercise objectives and scenarios, pre-exercise logistics, exercise conduct and participation, evaluation, meetings and reports; review and approval of Plan revisions that are utility-requested or exercise inadequacy related; remedial exercise, medical drill or any other exercise or drill upon which a license is predicated, with regard to preparation, review, conduct, participation, evaluation, meetings and reports; the issuance of interim findings pursuant to the FEMA/NRC Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) (App. A of this part); review of utility plan submissions through the NRC under the MOU; utility certification submission review under 44 CFR part 352 and follow-on activities; site-specific adjudicatory proceedings and any other site-specific legal costs and technical assistance that is utility requested or exercise inadequacy related. The professional staff rate for FY 91 is $39.00 per hour. The referenced FEMA/NRC MOU is provided in this rule as appendix A. The professional staff rate for the REP Program and related legal services will be revised on a fiscal year basis using the most current fiscal data available and the revised hourly rate will be published as a notice in the Federal Register for each fiscal year if the rate increases or decreases.
Exhibit 4.38


 


Termination Agreement


 


Party A:  Beijing Ambow Shida Education
Technology Co., Ltd.


 


Party B: Beijing Ambow Chuangying Education
and Technology Co., Ltd.


 


Party A and Party B
has mutually agreed on the termination, and reached the following agreement:


 


		1.	The “Technology Service Agreement” (hereinafter refer to as “Agreement”)
was signed by both parties on June 29, 2017. Both parties agreed to terminate the abovementioned Agreement from June 14, 2020,
not to execute, and not to pursue all the responsibilities and consequences arising from the Agreement.



 


		2.	This agreement takes into effect after being signed and
sealed by both parties.



 


		3.	The agreement shall be made in three copies with the same legal effect, in which Party A shall
hold two copies and Party B shall hold one copy respectively.



 


Party A (Seal):


 


Representative (Signature):


 


June 14, 2020


 


 


Party B (Seal):


 


Representative (Signature):


 


June 14, 2020
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-48 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, March 6, 1996)

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $50,000 FINE AGAINST DUKE POWER COMPANY

FOR ALLEGED VIOLATION OF REQUIREMENTS AT OCONEE NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $50,000 civil penalty against

Duke Power Company for alleged violation of NRC safety requirements at the Oconee nuclear

power plant near Seneca, South Carolina.

NRC officials said the fine was being proposed because the company failed to provide

adequate procedures to control fuel assembly movement in the spent fuel pool, resulting in an

irradiated fuel assembly being left withdrawn from its storage location in the pool during a

period from December 14, 1995 through January 8, 1996. The NRC said that, although the

assembly remained shielded under water, it could have become uncovered during certain

accident conditions requiring the use of water from the spent fuel pool.

In a letter to the company dated March 5, 1996, Stewart D. Ebneter, administrator of the

NRC's Region II office in Atlanta, said the agency is concerned that the control of fuel assembly

movements continues to be a problem at Oconee. He said the NRC issued two procedural

violations involving fuel movement at Oconee in August of 1994, one of which resulted in a

$15,000 civil penalty and that the agency is concerned with repetitive violations in this area.

Ebneter said credit was warranted for the company's corrective actions which included an

in-depth evaluation of the event, procedural upgrades, management changes and

improvements in training.

The company has 30 days from receipt of the Notice of Violation to either pay the civil

penalty or to protest its imposition.

####
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1572-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2023 Page 1 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1572-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2023 Page 2 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1572-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2023 Page 3 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1572-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2023 Page 4 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1572-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2023 Page 5 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1572-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2023 Page 6 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1572-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2023 Page 7 of 7
### §288f. Immunity proceedings

When directed to do so pursuant to section 288b(d) of this title, the Counsel shall serve as the duly authorized representative of the Senate or a committee or subcommittee of the Senate in requesting a United States district court to issue an order granting immunity pursuant to section 6005 of title 18.

(Pub. L. 95–521, title VII, §707, Oct. 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 1880.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 3, 1979, see section 717 of Pub. L. 95–521, set out as a note under section 288 of this title.
### §629. Criminal penalties

Whoever shall forcibly resist, oppose, impede, intimidate or interfere with a duly authorized representative of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission while it is engaged in the performance of duties under this chapter shall be punished by a fine of not more than $500 or by imprisonment for not more than one year, or by both: Provided, however, That no person shall be imprisoned under this section except when there has been a prior conviction hereunder.

(Pub. L. 90–202, §10, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 605; 1978 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §2, eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 43 F.R. 19807, 92 Stat. 3781.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Equal Employment Opportunity Commission" and "it" substituted in text for "Secretary", meaning Secretary of Labor, and "he", respectively, pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1978, §2, 43 F.R. 19807, 92 Stat. 3781, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, which transferred all functions vested by this section in Secretary of Labor to Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, effective Jan. 1, 1979, as provided by section 1–101 of Ex. Ord. No. 12106, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1053.
#### § 302.8 Waiver of “single” State agency requirements.

Section 205 of the Act requires that plans for civil defense of the United States be administered or supervised by a single State agency (50 U.S.C. App. 2286). Notwithstanding such law, section 204 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4214) provides authority for the Administrator as head of the grantor agency, upon the State's request, to waive the single State agency requirement and to approve other State administrative structure or arrangements, upon adequate showing that the requirement prevents the establishment of the most effective and efficient organizational arrangements within the State government. First, however, the Administrator must have found that the objectives of the Act (50 U.S.C. app. 2251 *et seq.*) will not be endangered by the use of such other State structure or arrangements. Attachment D of OMB Circular A-102 requires that such requests be given expeditious handling by the grantor agency and that, whenever possible, an affirmative response be made.

[48 FR 44211 Sept. 28, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 12521, Apr. 11, 1986]
### §1106. Expenditures and audit of trust fund

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to pay to the Center from the interest and earnings of the fund, and moneys credited to the fund pursuant to section 1108(a) of this title, such sums as the Board determines are necessary and appropriate to enable the Center to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

#### (b) Audit by GAO

The activities of the Center under this chapter may be audited by the Government Accountability Office under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the Comptroller General of the United States. Representatives of the Government Accountability Office shall have access to all books, accounts, records, reports, and files and all other papers, things, or property belonging to or in use by the Center, pertaining to such activities and necessary to facilitate the audit.

(Pub. L. 100–458, title I, §117, Oct. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2175; Pub. L. 101–520, title III, §313(b), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2282; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office" in two places.

1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–520 amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: "The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to pay to the Center from the interest and earnings of the fund such sums as the Board determines are necessary and appropriate to enable the Center to carry out the provisions of this chapter."
### §1922. Unified payroll administration

Payroll administration for the Capitol Police and civilian support personnel of the Capitol Police shall be carried out on a unified basis by a single disbursing authority. The Capitol Police Board, with the approval of the Committee on House Oversight of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate, acting jointly, shall, by contract or otherwise, provide for such unified payroll administration.

(July 31, 1946, ch. 707, §9C, as added Pub. L. 102–397, title I, §102, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1950; amended Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §221(12), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1750.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 207a of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "House Oversight" for "House Administration".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on House Oversight of House of Representatives changed to Committee on House Administration of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Jan. 6, 1999.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 102–397, title I, §104, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1950, as amended by Pub. L. 102–392, title III, §321, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1726, provided that: "The unified payroll administration under the amendment made by section 102 [enacting this section] shall apply with respect to pay periods beginning after September 30, 1993."

[Pub. L. 102–392, title III, §321, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1726, provided that the amendment made by that section to section 104 of Pub. L. 102–397, set out above, is effective Oct. 6, 1992.]
### §1221. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–1, title V, §504(a)(2), Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 41

Section, Pub. L. 102–166, title III, §322, Nov. 21, 1991, 105 Stat. 1098, related to severability.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

Pub. L. 104–1, title V, §504(a)(2), Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 41, provided in part that section 1221 of this title is repealed, except as provided in section 1435 of this title.
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual
Report on Form 20-F of Formula  Systems  (1985) Ltd.  (the  "Company")  for the period
ending  December 31, 2004 (the "Report"),  I, Naamit Salomon,  Principal  Financial
 Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Report fully complies with
the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information  contained in the
Report fairly presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and results
of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written
 statement  required  by Section 906 has been  provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

Date: June 30, 2005

|/s/ Naamit Salomon
Naamit Salomon
Vice President, Finance(Principal Financial Officer)
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.594 Originating goods. Except as otherwise provided in this subpart and General Note 29(m), HTSUS, a good imported into the customs territory of the United States will be considered an originating good under the CAFTA-DR only if: ( a ) The good is wholly obtained or produced entirely in the territory of one or more of the Parties;
( b ) The good is produced entirely in the territory of one or more of the Parties and: ( 1 ) Each non-originating material used in the production of the good undergoes an applicable change in tariff classification specified in General Note 29(n), HTSUS, and the good satisfies all other applicable requirements of General Note 29, HTSUS; or
( 2 ) The good otherwise satisfies any applicable regional value content or other requirements specified in General Note 29(n), HTSUS, and satisfies all other applicable requirements of General Note 29, HTSUS; or
( c ) The good is produced entirely in the territory of one or more of the Parties exclusively from originating materials.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-212 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, November 25, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has

scheduled a meeting of its subcommitee on thermal-hydraulic phenomena on December 16-17

in Rockville, Maryland.

The subcommittee will meet at 8:30 a.m. on both days in Room T-2B3 of the NRC’s Two

White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. The subcommittee will discuss the

application of the Westinghouse Electric Company’s WCOBRA/TRAC best-estimate, largebreak, loss-of-coolant-accident code to nuclear power plants with upper head plenum injections;

the NRC thermal hydraulic code review action plan; and the status of the NRC thermalhydraulic research program.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for public comment, will be

described in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

###
### §441e. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 441e was editorially reclassified as section 30121 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-96 August 1, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF ASSIGNS NEW SALEM RESIDENT INSPECTOR

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia,

Pa., have selected Ho K. Nieh, Jr, as the new resident inspector

at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station in Lower Alloways Creek,

NJ. He joins Senior Resident Inspector Michele Evans and

Resident Inspectors Jeff Laughlin and Ray Lorson at Salem.

Mr. Nieh joined the NRC in April of this year as a reactor

engineer in the Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa. Prior to

joining the agency, he worked at the Knolls Atomic Power

Laboratory (KAPL) in Ballston Spa, NY. He completed the U.S

Navy’s nuclear training program and was a nuclear plant engineer

at a naval nuclear prototype plant for KAPL. His duties included

operations, testing, maintenance, and training.

Mr. Nieh is a graduate of the Maritime College of the State

University of New York, where he earned a Bachelor’s of

Engineering degree (with honors) in marine engineering.

Mr. Nieh and his wife live in West Chester, Pa.

The NRC resident inspectors at Salem can be reached at

609/935-5151.

#
### §124. Direct shipment of wine

#### (a) Conditions for transporting certain wine

During any period in which the Federal Aviation Administration has in effect restrictions on airline passengers to ensure safety, the direct shipment of wine shall be permitted from States where wine is purchased from a winery, to another State or the District of Columbia, if—

(1) the wine was purchased while the purchaser was physically present at the winery;

(2) the purchaser of the wine provided the winery verification of legal age to purchase alcohol;

(3) the shipping container in which the wine is shipped is marked to require an adult's signature upon delivery;

(4) the wine is for personal use only and not for resale; and

(5) the purchaser could have carried the wine lawfully into the State or the District of Columbia to which the wine is shipped.

#### (b) Violations

If any person fails to meet any of the conditions under subsection (a), the attorney general of any State may bring a civil action under the same terms as those set out in section 122a of this title.

#### (c) Report

Not later than 2 years after November 2, 2002, and at 2-year intervals thereafter, the Attorney General of the United States, in consultation with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, shall prepare and submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report on the implementation of this section.

(Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, §11022, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1829.)
#### § 111.58 Content of statement of charges.

Any statement of charges referred to in this subpart must give a plain and concise, but not necessarily detailed, description of the facts claimed to constitute grounds for suspension or revocation of the license or permit. The statement of charges also must specify the sanction being proposed (that is, suspension of the license or permit or revocation of the license or permit), but if a suspension is proposed the charges need not state a specific period of time for which suspension is proposed. A statement of charges which fairly informs the broker of the charges against him so that he is able to prepare his response will be deemed sufficient. Different means by which a purpose might have been accomplished, or different intents with which acts might have been done, so as to constitute grounds for suspension or revocation of the license may be alleged in the alternative under a single count in the statement of charges.
# Den Europæiske Unions C 285A/17.

| | ISSN 1725-2393 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 285A |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 48. årgang17. november 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2393

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 285A

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

48. årgang17. november 2005

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Oplysninger |
| | Det Europæiske Personaleudvælgelseskontor (EPSO) |
| 2005/C 285A/2 | Reserveliste — Almindelig udvælgelsesprøve EPSO/AST/1/04 — Kontorister (C*1) | 3 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

III   Oplysninger

Det Europæiske Personaleudvælgelseskontor (EPSO)

2005/C 285A/2

Reserveliste — Almindelig udvælgelsesprøve EPSO/AST/1/04 — Kontorister (C*1)

3

---

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

III Oplysninger

Det Europæiske Personaleudvælgelseskontor (EPSO)

| 17.11.2005 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CA 285/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2005

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CA 285/3

---

RESERVELISTE (1)

ALMINDELIG UDVÆLGELSESPRØVE EPSO/AST/1/04

KONTORISTER (C*1)

(2005/C 285 A/01)

Konferenceteknikere

ASCHBERGER Andreas

BARQUILLA GONZÁLEZ Luis Enrique

BUSQUETS PÉREZ Luis Carlos

CAMPAROLAS SAMPIETRO Jorge

DELVAUX Eddy

DEMANET Vincent

DI TRANI Domenico

FALKOWSKI Reinhold Bruno

HERTOGS Roel

HEURCKMANS Edgard

KANKAANPAEAE Matti

KLEWAIS Johan

KOLLING Andreas

LAUDES Herman

MARTÍNEZ VÁZQUEZ Alberto

MIGACZ Michel

MUNTANE GREGORI Neus

PIRSON Louis

SERRY Luc

VAN CAUTER Jozef

VAN DE CALSEYDE Arnaud

VYNCKE Pieter

Listen over egnede ansøgere er gyldig indtil den 31. december 2006. Gyldigheden kan forlænges.

---

(1)  Hvis en egnet ansøger udtrykkeligt anmoder om det, vil hans/hendes navn ikke blive offentliggjort.

---