alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Freeport-McMoRan Sulpher Inc. financial statements at December 31, 1997
and for the 12 months then ended, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements. The earnings per share (EPS) data
shown below was prepared in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard No. 128,"Earnings Per Share," and basic and diluted EPS have been
entered in place of primary and fully diluted, respectively.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001046204
<NAME> FREEPORT-MCMORAN SULPHER INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          21,293
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     34,421
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,435
<PP&E>                                         841,222
<DEPRECIATION>                                 731,389
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 273,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,831
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           103
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,294
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   273,033
<SALES>                                        211,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               211,945
<CGS>                                          644,311
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  644,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (439,316)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (65,105)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (374,199)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (374,199)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (36.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (36.16)
        

</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-076 April 27, 2000

NRC TO DISCUSS APPARENT USEC VIOLATIONS

AT PRE-DECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE ON MAY 3

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff and officials of the United States Enrichment

Corporation will meet on Wednesday, May 3, to discuss apparent violations of agency regulations

identified during NRC’s review of the corporation’s 1999 annual update to its certificate

documentation for the Paducah and Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plants.

USEC is a private corporation that enriches uranium for use as fuel in commercial nuclear

power plants.

The pre-decisional enforcement conference, which will be open to the public for observation,

will be held from 9 a.m. until noon in Room O3B 4 of the NRC’s One White Flint North building at

11555 Rockville Pike in Rockville, Maryland. NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to

answer questions from observers who attend.

Specifically, the NRC has identified apparent violations in USEC’s implementation of its

program for making changes at the two facilities. Certain changes should have been approved by NRC

before USEC’s implementation of them.

The decision to hold a pre-decisional enforcement conference does not mean that the NRC has

determined a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather,

the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide USEC

with an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC review; and to enable

USEC to outline its proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will made at this conference. That decision will be

made by NRC officials at a later time.

###
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William A. Collins, Appellant, v. Rhinelander Waldo, as Police Commissioner, etc., Respondent.

Writ dismissed and proceedings affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBellows flow-induced vibrationsThe bellows flow excitation mechanism and results of comprehensive test program are summarized. The analytical model for predicting bellows flow induced stress is refined. The model includes the effects of an upstream elbow, arbitrary geometry, and multiple piles. A refined computer code for predicting flow induced stress is described which allows life prediction if a material S-N diagram is available.Document ID19840014844Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsTygielski, P. J.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Smyly, H. M.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Gerlach, C. R.*(Gerlach Products, Inc.)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1983Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-82556CDDF:80-5NAS 1.15:82556Accession Number84N22912Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840014844.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****Annual report fy...**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc:ID 1.27:T 48/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000636512
 
November 1, 2017
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
September 30, 2004, of Synagro Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert C. Boucher, Jr., certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company and that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



                                     /s/ Robert C. Boucher, Jr.
                                     -----------------------------------
                                     Robert C. Boucher, Jr.
                                     March 21, 2005
950 L'Enfant Plaza, SW

Washington, DC 20024

----- Forwarded by Barbara Adams/AWA/FAA on 07/22/2013 10:10 AM -----

From: Darrin Greubel <darrin.greubel@expressjet.com>

AIR-230, Airworthiness Certification Branch

To: Barbara Adams/AWA/FAA@FAA, 

Cc: Gregory Wooley <Gregory.Wooley@expressjet.com>, Scott Hall <scott.hall@expressjet.com>, 

Charles Tutt <charles.tutt@expressjet.com>, James Barbour <james.barbour@expressjet.com>, 

Robert Burke/AWA/FAA@FAA

Date: 07/20/2013 09:34 PM

Subject: Exemption

Barbara,

It was great talking to you at the AABI conference last week. Thank you for explaining the new rule

making to everyone and I appreciate the time you spent answering my additional questions. Please

accept this email as notification to withdraw the petition for exemption be ExpressJet regarding the

logging  of simulator time in part 121 operations towards the ATP Certificate. The new rule making

addresses this issue and we very much appreciate it.

Best Regards,

Darrin G.

Darrin Greubel | Manager - Line Operations | ExpressJet Airlines Inc. | 990 Toffie Terrace | Atlanta, Ga 

30354 | O 404.856.1723 | C 404.502.7509 | Please note that my email address has changed to 

darrin.greubel@expressjet.com. Visit www.expressjet.com to learn about the new ExpressJet! 

NOTICE: This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC §§2510-2521, is 

confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, 

dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have received 

the message in error, then delete it.
May 24, 2012



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LUCAS RURIC COE , Appellant

NO. 14

- 10

- 00929

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , that the appellant pay all costs expended in this

app eal, and that this decision be certified below for observance.
Editorial Note on Part 142
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 142.28 Withdrawal or entry summary not required for prohibited merchandise. ( a ) *Exportation or destruction of prohibited merchandise.* If merchandise released under a special permit for immediate delivery later is found to be prohibited, an authorized CBP official shall demand its recall in accordance with § 141.113 of this chapter (applicable to the recall of merchandise released from Customs custody), and withdrawal or entry summary documentation and the deposit of estimated duties, if any, shall not be required provided: ( 1 ) The merchandise is exported or destroyed under Customs supervision within the time limit for entry specified in § 142.23, or
( 2 ) An entry for exportation or for transportation and exportation filed using an in-bond application pursuant to part 18 of this chapter, or an application to destroy the merchandise, is made within the specified time limit, and the exportation or destruction is accomplished promptly.
( b ) *Procedures for exportation or destruction.* The exportation or destruction of prohibited merchandise required by paragraph (a) of this section shall be under the same procedures as exportation or destruction of prohibited merchandise covered by a consumption entry with remission or refund of duties. See §§ 158.41 and 158.45(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Notation on exportation entry.* An entry for exportation or for transportation and exportation of prohibited merchandise for which no entry summary for consumption has been filed shall be stamped or imprinted conspicuously with the legend:
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17447, July 2, 1973, as amended by CBP Dec 17-13, 82 FR 45406, Sept. 28, 2017]
§ 132.15 Export certificate for beef subject to tariff-rate quota. ( a ) *Requirement.* In order to claim the in-quota tariff rate of duty on beef, defined in 15 CFR 2012.2(a), that is the product of a participating country, defined in 15 CFR 2012.2(e), the importer must possess a valid export certificate at the time that such beef is entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption. The importer must record the unique identifying number of the export certificate for the beef on the entry summary or warehouse withdrawal for consumption (Customs Form 7501, Column 34), or its electronic equivalent.
( b ) *Validity of certificate.* The export certificate, to be valid, must meet the requirements of 15 CFR 2012.3(b), and with respect to the requirement of 15 CFR 2012.3(b)(3) that the certificate be distinct and uniquely identifiable, the certificate must have a distinct and unique identifying number composed of three elements set forth in the following order: ( 1 ) The last digit of the year for which the export certificate is in effect;
( 2 ) The 2-digit ISO country of origin code from Annex B of the HTSUS which identifies the participating country (see § 142.42(d) of this chapter); and
( 3 ) Any 6-digit number issued by the participating country with respect to the export certificate.
( c ) *Retention and submission of certificate to Customs* — ( 1 ) *Retention.* The export certificate must be retained by the importer for a period of at least 5 years from the date of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption (see § 163.4(a) of this chapter).
( 2 ) *Submission to Customs.* The importer shall submit a copy of the export certificate to Customs upon request.
[T.D. 95-58, 60 FR 39109, Aug. 1, 1995, as amended by T.D. 99-87, 64 FR 67483, Dec. 2, 1999; T.D. 00-7, 65 FR 5431, Feb. 4, 2000]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           8,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,691
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,898
<PP&E>                                         544,807
<DEPRECIATION>                                 146,856
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 610,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,849
<BONDS>                                        502,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,984
<COMMON>                                        77,851
<OTHER-SE>                                         119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   610,688
<SALES>                                          5,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,800
<CGS>                                            1,072
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,936
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (3)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,939
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,939
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the consolidated financial statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
<F2>Represents basic and diluted net loss per unit allocated to limited partners.
</FN>


</TABLE>
### §1436. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–57, title III, §313, Sept. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 428

Section, Pub. L. 104–1, title V, §507, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 43; Pub. L. 105–275, title I, §12, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2436, related to use of frequent flyer miles.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

61 Forsyth Street SW

Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-09 February 2, 2000

CONTACT: Kenneth M. Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC Inspection Team at Hatch Plant

to Brief Southern Nuclear Officials Friday

Meeting will Be Open to Public Observation

A team of Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspectors, dispatched to Southern Nuclear

Operating Company’s Hatch nuclear power plant, located near Baxley in southern Georgia, this past

weekend to review a January 26 automatic shutdown, will brief company officials on their preliminary

findings at 10:00 a.m. Friday, February 4 at the plant site. The briefing will be open to observation by

the public and the media and NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to answer observers’

questions.

Unit 1 automatically shut down when a valve in one of the two main lines carrying water to the

reactor closed, and some of the equipment did not operate as expected. The NRC inspection team,

called an Augmented Inspection Team or AIT, is reviewing equipment performance, operator actions

and company response to the event .

The NRC team will issue a written report which will be available to the public in several

weeks.

#####
#### Margaret Hall, Respondent, v. Moore Realty Company, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.

Judgment modified by reducing the amount adjudged to be due to the plaintiff by the sum of $408, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Order to be settled on notice. Present— Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### Ethel Faber, Appellant, v. Louis Faber, Respondent.

No opinion. Appeal from order setting case for trial dismissed, without costs, as academic. Present— Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-44 April 28, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH NU AND PUBLIC ON MILLSTONE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with the

Northeast Utilities on Wednesday afternoon, April 30, to discuss

NU's operational readiness to restart Millstone Station, in

Waterford, Ct. The meeting, which is open to the public for

observation, will be held at 1 p.m. in the Millstone Simulator

and Training Facility at the site.

The NRC staff also will meet with the public to discuss the

status of NRC activities at Millstone Station. The staff also

will accept comments on Sargent and Lundy's audit plans for the

Independent Corrective Action Verification Program at Units 1 and

3. Copies of the plans are available at the Waterford Public

Library. The meeting, which begins at 7 p.m., will be held in

the Waterford Town Hall, at 15 Rope Ferry Road.

#
EXHIBIT 10.3

CONSENT, AGREEMENT AND AFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY

Each of the undersigned Guarantors hereby consents to the terms of the foregoing Amendment and agrees that the terms of the Amendment shall not affect in any way its obligations and liabilities under any Loan Document
(as such Loan Documents are amended or otherwise expressly modified by the Amendment), all of which obligations and liabilities shall remain in full force and effect and each of which is hereby reaffirmed (as amended or otherwise expressly modified
by the Amendment). The Guarantors hereby confirm that the security interests and Liens granted pursuant to the Loan Documents continue to secure the Obligations including the Local Credit Facility Obligations and that such security interests and
Liens remain in full force and effect.



ALLTRISTA PLASTICS LLC AMERICAN HOUSEHOLD,
INC. AUSTRALIAN COLEMAN, INC. BICYCLE HOLDING, INC.
BRK BRANDS, INC. CC OUTLET, INC. COLEMAN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC COLEMAN WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
EARTH PRODUCTS INC. FIRST ALERT, INC. FISHING SPIRIT, INC. HEARTHMARK, LLC HOLMES MOTOR CORPORATION JARDEN ACQUISITION I, LLC JARDEN ZINC PRODUCTS, LLC JT SPORTS LLC K2 INC. K-2 CORPORATION K2 LICENSED PRODUCTS, INC. K2 MERCHANDISING, INC. K2 PROPERTIES, INC. KANSAS ACQUISITION CORP. L.A. SERVICES, INC. LASER ACQUISITION CORP. LEHIGH CONSUMER PRODUCTS LLC LOEW-CORNELL, LLC MARKER VOLKL USA, INC. MARMOT MOUNTAIN, LLC MIKEN SPORTS, LLC NIPPON COLEMAN, INC. OUTDOOR TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION PENN FISHING TACKLE MFG. CO. PINE MOUNTAIN LLC PURE FISHING, INC. QUOIN, LLC RAWLINGS SPORTING GOODS COMPANY, INC. SEA STRIKER, INC. SHAKESPEARE COMPANY, LLC SHAKESPEARE CONDUCTIVE FIBERS, LLC SI II, INC. SITCA CORPORATION SUNBEAM AMERICAS HOLDINGS, LLC SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC.




---

THE COLEMAN COMPANY, INC. THE UNITED STATES PLAYING CARD COMPANY USPC HOLDING, INC.By:

/s/ John E. CappsName:

John E. CappsTitle:

Vice President


[SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDMENT
NO. 9 CONSENT]
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00121

- CR

T IMOTHY D EAN M C A LISTER

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Criminal

Court No. 2

of Tarr ant County (1488130)

January 10, 2019

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the tria l

court is affirmed.

S ECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
### §110. Review by court of appeals of issuance or denial of temporary injunctions; record

Whenever any court of the United States shall issue or deny any temporary injunction in a case involving or growing out of a labor dispute, the court shall, upon the request of any party to the proceedings and on his filing the usual bond for costs, forthwith certify as in ordinary cases the record of the case to the court of appeals for its review. Upon the filing of such record in the court of appeals, the appeal shall be heard and the temporary injunctive order affirmed, modified, or set aside expeditiously 1

(Mar. 23, 1932, ch. 90, §10, 47 Stat. 72; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §32(a), 62 Stat. 991; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §127, 63 Stat. 107; Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §402(30), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3359.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–620 substituted "expeditiously" for "with the greatest possible expedition, giving the proceedings precedence over all other matters except older matters of the same character."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, as amended by act May 24, 1949, substituted "court of appeals" for "circuit court of appeals".

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as a note under section 1657 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a period.