alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Summary Financial Data Schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from Balance Sheet,  Statement of Cash Flows, Statement of Operations
and Notes thereto incorporated in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-KSB and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              27
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  260,349
<ALLOWANCES>                                   139,687
<INVENTORY>                                     66,551
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               466,614
<PP&E>                                         145,211
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,837)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 589,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          429,173
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,445
<OTHER-SE>                                     169,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   598,988
<SALES>                                      1,519,336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,519,336
<CGS>                                          437,258
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  437,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,259,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,785
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (181,315)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (181,315)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)



</TABLE>
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-154 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, September 1, 1998)

26TH ANNUAL WATER REACTOR SAFETY INFORMATION MEETING TO BE HELD

OCTOBER 26-28 IN BETHESDA, MD.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s 26th Water Reactor Safety Information Meeting,

featuring presentations and discussions on a number of leading technical topics, will be held

October 26-28 at the Bethesda, Md., Marriott Hotel.

Participants will include representatives from the NRC, U.S. government laboratories,

private contractors, universities, electric industry groups, reactor vendors, and a number of

foreign agencies.

Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson will deliver the keynote address at 8:30 a.m. on Monday,

October 26, at the opening plenary session. Commissioner Nils J. Diaz will speak at

lunchtime. A panel discussion on Tuesday morning will focus on the future of research. The

luncheon speaker that day will be Carlos Vitanza, of the Organization for Economic

Cooperation and Development, who will discuss the Halden Reactor Project.

During the three-day meeting, presentations will be made in 11 technical areas --

pressure vessels; severe accidents and fission product behavior; nuclear materials issues and

health effects; materials integrity; structural performance; digital instrumentation and control;

the Halden Program; probabilistic risk assessment methods and applications; thermalhydraulics; plant aging; and high burn-up fuel.

Those wishing to attend are asked to register with the meeting coordinator, Susan

Monteleone of Brookhaven National Laboratory, Building 130, Upton, N.Y., 11973-5000. The

telephone number is (516) 344-7235. Her e-mail address is SMONTELE@BNL.GOV.

Additional information on this meeting can be found on the web at

www.nrc.gov/RES/WRSM/wrsm.html.

#
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.310 Election to average for motor vehicles. ( a ) *Election.* In determining whether a motor vehicle is originating for purposes of the preferences under the Agreement or a Canadian article under the Automotive Products Trade Act of 1965 (APTA), a manufacturer may elect to average, over its 12-month financial year, its calculation of the value-content requirement for vehicles of the same class or sister vehicles which are assembled in the same plant as provided for in the Agreement. A manufacturer must declare its election to average before the importation of any vehicles produced within the identified 12-month period. The election to average is subject to the conditions and requirements set forth in §§ 10.310 and 10.311.
( b ) *Effect of election.* An election to average shall be binding at the time of the first entry of vehicles for which the election has been made and shall remain binding for the plant for the entire period covered by the election. If a manufacturer's annual report, required by § 10.311, does not verify the claim that the vehicles are originating goods under the Agreement or Canadian articles under APTA, or if a manufacturer otherwise fails to comply with the reporting requirements, entries of the vehicles identified in the averaging declaration will be subject to liquidation in accordance with the rate of duty which would otherwise apply.
( c ) *Election in lieu of certificate of origin.* In lieu of the Exporter's Certificate of Origin required in § 10.307(c), an importer of vehicles covered by an election to average under this section may have its claim for preference based on a copy of the declaration of election.
[T.D. 89-3, 53 FR 51766, Dec. 23, 1988, as amended by T.D. 92-8, 57 FR 2455, Jan. 22, 1992]
Supreme Court of the United States

Office of the Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

October 3, 2022

Clerk

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh 

Circuit

56 Forsyth Street, N.W.

Atlanta, GA 30303

Re: Mordechai Korf, et al.

v. United States

No. 21-1364

(Your No. 20-14223-AA)

Dear Clerk:

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Sincerely,

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

(202) 479-3011

USCA11 Case: 20-14223 Date Filed: 10/03/2022 Page: 1 of 1 

20-mj-03278-JJO-1

JE Oct 3, 2022 MIAMI

Case 1:20-mj-03278-JJO Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2022 Page 1 of 1
#### Robert B. Hirsch and Another, Respondents, v. S. Hyman Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.600 Definitions. ( a ) *Certificate* is the document the FTA issues representing either a beneficial fractional undivided interest in a Pool (Pool Certificate), or a fractional undivided interest in some or all of the guaranteed portion of an individual 7(a) guaranteed loan (Individual Certificate).
( b ) *Current* means that no repayment from a Borrower to a Lender is over 29 days late measured from the due date of the payment on the records of the FTA's central registry (Pools) or the entity servicing the loan (individual guaranteed portion).
( c ) *Dollar-Weighted Average Net Rate* of a Pool is calculated by multiplying the interest rate of each loan in the Pool by the ratio of that loan's current outstanding guaranteed principal to the current outstanding guaranteed principal of all loans in the Pool, and adding the sum of the resulting products. The Dollar-Weighted Average Net Rate of a Pool will fluctuate over the life of the Pool as loan defaults, prepayments and normal loan repayments occur.
( d ) *FTA* is the SBA's fiscal and transfer agent.
( e ) *Note Rate* is the interest rate on the Borrower's note.
( f ) *Net Rate* is the interest rate on an individual guaranteed portion of a loan in a Pool.
( g ) *Pool* is an aggregation of SBA guaranteed portions of loans made by Lenders.
( h ) *Pool Assembler* is a financial institution that: ( 1 ) Organizes and packages a Pool by acquiring the SBA guaranteed portions of loans from Lenders;
( 2 ) Resells fractional interests in the Pool to Registered Holders; and
( 3 ) Directs the FTA to issue Certificates.
( i ) *Pool Rate* is the interest rate on a Pool Certificate.
( j ) *Registered Holder* is the Certificate owner listed in FTA's records.
( k ) *SBA's Secondary Market Program Guide* is an issuance from SBA which describes the characteristics of Secondary Market transactions.
( l ) *Weighted Average Coupon (WAC) Pool* is a Pool where the interest rate payable to the investor is equal to the Dollar-Weighted Average Net Rate of the Pool.
[61 FR 3235, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 67102, Nov. 13, 2008; 76 FR 63546, Oct. 12, 2011]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

ORDER DENYING J. BRIAN FERGUSON’S 

MOTION TO INTERVENE AND LIFT THE LITIGATION INJUNCTION 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Movant J. Brian Ferguson’s Motion to 

Intervene and Lift the Litigation Injunction (“Motion”), [ECF No. 1687], filed on August 30, 2023. 

The Court has reviewed the Motion and the Receiver’s Response, [ECF No. 1696], which 

acknowledges that the parties have agreed to the relief provided for in this Order. Accordingly, it 

is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida this 11th day of September, 2023.

________________________________

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1699 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/12/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RY. CO., a Corporation, Respondent, v. TRIPP, as County Treasurer of Yankton County, South Dakota, Appellant.

(197 N. W. 785.)

(File No. 5375.

Opinion filed March 18, 1924.)

Appeal and Error — Briefs—Court Rules — Judgment Affirmed Where Appeal Abandoned by Default in Filing Briefs.

Where no brief was filed by- appellant within the time for filing appellant’s brief, and no other action of any kind was taken in prosecuting appeal or complying with the Supreme Court rules, the appeal will be deemed abandoned, and the judgment appealed from will he affirmed.

*275Appeal from Circuit Court, Yankton County; Hon. R. B. Tripp, Judge.

*H. A. Doyle,*.'State’s Attorney, of Yankton, for Appellant.

*Ed L. Grantham*and *H. 0. Hepperle,*both of Aberdeen, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

A certified copy of a notice of appeal from an order overruling a demurrer, admission of service, and stipulation that appellant in taking said appeal was acting solely ill her capacity as county treasurer, and therefore need give no undertaking, was filed in this court on April n, 1923. Notice to the clerk of this court that the record on appeal was settled April 17, 1923, was filed here April 21, 1923. The original notice of appeal and stipulation, -copies of which are mentioned above, were filed in this court on May 7, 1923. No briefs or other papers of any kind have been filed with this court. The appellant having failed to comply with rules 5, 6, 7, and 13 of this court within the time therein prescribed, or at all, the appeal is deemed abandoned, and the order of the lower court is affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 197 N. W. 785. See, Headnote, Appeal and Error, 3 C. J. Sec. 1607, 4 C. J. Sec. 2437.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-94 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, June 18, 1998)

NRC ORDER TO THE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CONFIRMS AGREEMENT

TO COMPLETE FIRE BARRIER CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AT SEQUOYAH 1 AND 2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a confirmatory order to the

Tennessee Valley Authority confirming its commitment to complete Thermo-Lag fire

barrier corrective actions at its Sequoyah nuclear power plant Units 1 and 2 by June 30,

1999. The plant is located near Chattanooga, Tennessee.

In a letter to TVA officials, Sam Collins, Director of the NRC’s Office of Nuclear

Reactor Regulation, said the order was issued because of concern “that some

licensees may not be making adequate progress toward resolving the plant-specific

issues, and that some implementation schedules may either be too tenuous or too

protracted.” The Sequoyah plants are among them.

Thermo-Lag is a fire barrier material manufactured and supplied by Thermal

Science, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, and has been used to provide fire resistance to

wiring and equipment at nuclear plants. The NRC has been concerned that ThermoLag 330-1 fire barrier material installed by some of its licensees may not provide the

intended level of fire protection and that licensees thus may not be meeting regulatory

requirements. Between 1992 and 1994, the NRC staff issued letters to all nuclear

utilities asking licensees to submit plans and schedules for resolving the issue. All

licensees with Thermo-Lag fire barriers have implemented around-the-clock “fire

watches,” using workers to patrol vital plant areas on a regular basis to watch for signs

of fire until corrective actions have been completed.

In his letter to TVA officials, Collins noted that NRC has been meeting with

licensees to review their progress in completing implementation of their fire barrier

programs, but has been concerned about slow progress on resolution of the issue at

certain plants.

TVA was one of the licensees with which NRC has periodically held meetings.

At these meetings, the NRC reviewed TVA’s schedule for Thermo-Lag corrective

actions and concluded they are reasonable. The company formally agreed May 13 to
the terms of the confirmatory order.

About 20 other plants have gotten or are expected to receive similar orders in the

coming months.

##
#### § 208.61 Payment of claims.

DHS will reimburse all allowable costs for which a Sponsoring Agency requests reimbursement within 30 days after DHS determines that reimbursement is allowable, in whole or in part, at any stage of the reimbursement and appeal processes identified in this subpart.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-01 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, January 4, 1999)

NOTE TO EDITORS: ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING DATE AND TOPIC CHANGED

The date and subject of a Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on

Reactor Safeguards subcommittee meeting has been changed.

The meeting of the subcommittee on reliability and probabilistic risk assessment has

been changed from January 21 to January 25. It will be held at 1:00 p.m. in Room T-2B3 of the

NRC's Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. The subcommittee will discuss

the use of frequency-consequence curves (a tool for analyzing risks) in risk-informed decision

making. The subcommittee will not review proposed options to make 10 CFR 50.59 riskinformed, as previously announced.

All other aspects of the meeting remain the same as described in a Federal Register

notice published on December 23.

#
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.2025 Transit and transshipment. ( a ) *General.* A good that has undergone production necessary to qualify as an originating good under § 10.2014 will not be considered an originating good if, subsequent to that production, the good: ( 1 ) Undergoes further production or any other operation outside the territories of the Parties, other than unloading, reloading, or any other operation necessary to preserve the good in good condition or to transport the good to the territory of a Party; or
( 2 ) Does not remain under the control of customs authorities in the territory of a non-Party.
( b ) *Documentary evidence.* An importer making a claim that a good is originating may be required to demonstrate, to CBP's satisfaction, that the conditions and requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section were met. An importer may demonstrate compliance with this section by submitting documentary evidence. Such evidence may include, but is not limited to, bills of lading, airway bills, packing lists, commercial invoices, receiving and inventory records, and customs entry and exit documents.
Exhibit 4.431

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182309 dated April 06, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Telematic services

 

This License is granted to

 

Limited Liability Company

 

MTS Media

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1197746576060

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7707434100

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

apt 6,  12 bldg 3, Petrovskiy brd, Moscow, 127051

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until April 06, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 06, 2020 No. 145-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ A.A.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF COMMUNICATIONS,
   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119364
§ 204.23 Processing a request for a fire management assistance declaration. ( a ) In processing a State's request for a fire management assistance declaration, the Regional Administrator, in coordination with the Principal Advisor, will verify the information submitted in the State's request.
( b ) The Principal Advisor, at the request of the Regional Administrator, is responsible for providing FEMA a technical assessment of the fire or fire complex for which the State is requesting a fire management assistance declaration. The Principal Advisor may consult with State agencies, usually emergency management or forestry, as well as the Incident Commander, in order to provide FEMA with an accurate assessment.
[75 FR 50715, Aug. 17, 2010]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Live Ventures Incorporated (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jon Isaac, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|By: | /s/ Jon Isaac                         | 
|--- | ------------------------------------- | 
|    | Jon Isaac                             | 
|    | President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|    | (Principal Executive Officer)         | 
|    | January
18, 2018                      | 





A signed original of this certification
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

101 Marietta Street, N.W.

Suite 2900

Atlanta, GA 30323

No: II-97-22 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark (404) 331-5503 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)

 Roger Hannah (404) 331-7878

NRC STAFF RELEASES EVALUATION OF OPERATIONS AT ROBINSON

Plant Improves Assessment In Two Functional Areas

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a Systematic Assessment

of Licensee Performance (SALP) report for Carolina Power & Light Company's

Robinson nuclear power plant, located near Hartsville, South Carolina, which

indicates Category 1 (superior) performance in the functional areas of Plant

Operations and Plant Support and sustains previous Category 2 (good) ratings in

Maintenance and Engineering.

 The assessment covered a period of operations from June 18, 1995 through

February 8, 1997.

 NRC officials said improvements in performance were observed in all areas,

with superior performance in Plant Operations characterized by good management

oversight and continued emphasis on high standards. Safety performance in

radiological controls and emergency planning contributed to a "superior"

assessment in the area of Plant Support.

 The NRC's regional administrator in Atlanta, Luis A. Reyes, said there were

significant improvements site-wide in safety assessment and quality verification,

with a strong commitment to effective self-assessments in all functional areas

evaluated.

 NRC officials will meet with company management at the Robinson site on

March 25 at 1:00 p.m. to discuss details of the evaluation. The meeting is open

to observation by the public and the press. NRC officials will be available at

its conclusion to answer questions from interested observers.

#