{00394359.DOC;2}

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-CV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.

Defendants.

______________________________________/

DANIEL SCARAMELLINO, ONE NINE COUNTRY DRIVE, LLC, AND MICHELLE

SCARAMELLINO’S UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO RECEIVER’S EXPEDITED MOTION TO 

EXPAND RECEIVERSHIP [ECF NO. 1180]

Interested Parties, Daniel Scaramellino, 19 Country Drive, LLC, and Michelle 

Scaramellino (collectively, “Responding Parties”), through their undersigned counsel, hereby 

jointly file this unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Receiver, Ryan K. 

Stumphauzer’s Expedited Motion to Expand the Receivership to Include 19 Country Drive, 

Morristown, NJ 07960 [ECF No. 1180] (the “Expedited Motion”), and state as follows:

1. Pursuant to the Court’s original order (Doc. No. 1182), the Responding Parties

were to file their response to the Expedited Motion on March 24, 2022. 

2. On about March 24, 2022, The Receiver and the Responding Parties had reached 

an agreement in principle to an escrow procedure regarding the proceeds of the sale of the New 

Jersey Property, with the intent of providing the parties a 30-day opportunity to attempt reach a 

settlement regarding the Motion to Expedite. The Respondents worked for hours on attempting 

to reach the agreement, however, due to information learned by Receiver’s counsel at about 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1243 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2022 Page 1 of 4
{00394359.DOC;2} 2

11:45 p.m. or so on March 24, 2022, Receiver’s counsel indicated that the Receiver needs to 

discuss the issues further and determine how to proceed. Thus, the Responding Parties filed their 

First Motion for Extension to File their Response (the “Motion for Extension”) (Doc. No. 1193).

3. On April 1, 2022, the Responding Parties filed their Second Unopposed Motion 

for Extension, seeking 7 additional days to file their response (Doc. No. 1204) (the “Second 

Motion for Extension”), to which the Court granted on April 1, 2022 (Doc. No. 1205).

4. On April 8, 2022, the Receiver and the Responding Parties reached a partial 

agreement allowing for the sale of the Property, but with funds to be held in escrow pending 

resolution of the remaining Motion to Expand Receivership and/or a global settlement. The 

parties filed their Joint Motion to Amend/Correct the original Order and seeking extension of 

time to respond to the Motion to Expand (Doc. No. 1208) (the “Joint Motion to Modify”).

5. On April 9, 2022, the Court entered its Order Granting the Joint Motion to Modify 

(Doc. No. 1209). 

6. On May 10, 2022, the Court entered an order Granting the Joint Expedited

Motion (doc 1228) for a 7-day extension of time to respond to the Motion to Expand (doc. 1229), 

which currently sets the deadline for the Responding Parties to file their responses to May 16, 

2022. 

7. In the past 7 days, now that the sale of the Property has been completed, Mr. 

Scaramellino has also been gathering information needed to further settlement discussions. 

Additional time is needed to obtain additional information related to the viability of a global

settlement between Mr. Scaramellino and the Receiver related to the underlying breach of 

contract claims pending. Ms. Scaramellino has also provided a substantial settlement offer to 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1243 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2022 Page 2 of 4
{00394359.DOC;2} 3

which the Receiver should be given adequate time to analyze and discuss follow up information 

regarding the same.

8. As a result, the Responding Parties require a 15-day extension of their response 

deadline. This will provide time to see whether the agreement in principle can be reached or to 

otherwise finalize their response. 

9. In view of the circumstances and continued developments and steps toward 

settlement, the Receiver has no objection to the foregoing 15-day extension. 

10. If a global settlement cannot be reached with the Receiver, and as will be set out 

in more detail in their responses, the Responding Parties continue to oppose the Expedited 

Motion on numerous grounds, including due process and jurisdiction, among others, and would 

request an evidentiary hearing and a right to full discovery. This Motion is with full reservation 

of all rights and arguments and is not a submission to jurisdiction. 

WHEREFORE, the Responding Parties, respectfully request that this Court enter an order 

extending the deadline for the Responding Parties to file a response for fifteen (15) additional 

days, through and including, May 31, 2022, and for such other relief as the Court deems just.

Dated: May 16, 2022

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James D. Silver

James D. Silver, Florida Bar No.: 373702

KELLEY KRONENBERG, P.A.

10360 West State Road 84

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33324

Telephone: 954-370-9970

jsilver@kelleykronenberg.com

raldama@kelleykronenberg.com

Counsel for 19 Country Drive, LLC and 

Michelle Scaramellino

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1243 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2022 Page 3 of 4
{00394359.DOC;2} 4

and

/s/ Katie Brinson Hinton 

KATIE BRINSON HINTON, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 0022367

Jennis Morse Etlinger

606 E. Madison Street

Tampa, FL 33602

Telephone: (813) 229-2800

khinton@jennislaw.com

ecf@jennislaw.com

Attorney for Daniel Scaramellino

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 16, 2022, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

was filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. 

/s/Katie Brinson Hinton

Katie Brinson Hinton

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1243 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2022 Page 4 of 4