alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas W. PLEASANTS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6300.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 23, 2002.

Douglas W. Pleasants, Appellant Pro Se. Janice McKenzie Cole, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Douglas W. Pleasants seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Pleasants’ motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Pleasants,*Nos. CR-96-21; CA-00-637-5-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2001); *see also United States v. Sanders,*247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-74 June 24, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

NRC RESCHEDULES PUBLIC MEETING ON MILLSTONE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Special Projects

Office has rescheduled a meeting with the public for July 7 to

discuss the status of Millstone Station. The meeting had

originally been scheduled for June 30.

The meeting, at the Waterford Town Hall, will be held from

7 p.m. to 11 p.m.

#
#### § 11.1 General collection standards.

The general standards and procedures governing the collection, compromise, termination and referral to the Department of Justice of claims for money and property that are prescribed in the regulations issued jointly by the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Justice pursuant to the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966 (4 CFR part 101 *et seq.*), apply to the administrative claim collection activities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-123 September 17, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC COMMISSIONER DIAZ POSTPONES SALEM/HOPE CREEK PRESS BRIEFING

Commissioner Nils J. Diaz of the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission has postponed his upcoming visit to the Salem and Hope

Creek nuclear power plants and press briefing. Both had been

scheduled for Thursday, September 18.

Dr. Diaz is suffering from bronchitis that prevents him from

travelling. He will reschedule his tour of the Hancocks Bridge,

N.J., facilities and press conference at a later date.

#
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-165 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 4


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-165 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of 4


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-165 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 3 of 4


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-165 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32



                                  CERTIFICATION

     By signing below, each of the undersigned  hereby certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that, to his knowledge,  (i) this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly  period ended  December 31, 2004  ("Report")  fully  complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii)
the  information  contained  in this Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FFW Corporation.

     Signed this 11th day of February, 2005.

                                              FFW CORPORATION
                                              Registrant


Date:    February 11, 2005                    By:   /s/ Roger K. Cromer
     ----------------------                      -------------------------------
                                                 Roger K. Cromer
                                                 President and Chief
                                                        Executive Officer


Date:    February 11, 2005                    By:   /s/ Timothy A. Sheppard
     ----------------------                      -------------------------------
                                                 Timothy A. Sheppard
                                                 Treasurer and Chief
                                                        Accounting Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to FFW  Corporation  and  will  be  retained  by FFW  Corporation  and
forwarded to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-258

December 6, 1999

NRC SCHEDULES THIRD MEETING TO OBTAIN PUBLIC VIEWS ON

REVISION OF NUCLEAR FUEL FACILITY INSPECTION PROGRAM

The NRC will meet on December 15 in Rockville, Maryland, to obtain suggestions for

revising the agency’s safety inspection program for nuclear fuel cycle and uranium enrichment

facilities.

This meeting is the third of several to be held over the next two years to factor public

comments into the revised fuel facility safety inspection program. At last month’s meeting, the

NRC staff presented its rationale for establishing certain indicators to assess a facility’s safety

performance. The December meeting seeks public comments on the possible use of those

performance indicators.

The initiative to revise the safety inspection and oversight program for fuel facilities

reflects the agency’s desire to apply more objective and safety-significant criteria in assessing

the performance of all its licensees, as well as the need to effectively regulate with a smaller

staff and budget. This initiative will employ lessons learned from the revised commercial

nuclear reactor inspection and oversight program, which is undergoing a pilot test program.

The nuclear fuel cycle begins with the milling of uranium ore to produce uranium

concentrate called “yellowcake.” The yellowcake is converted into uranium hexafluoride gas at

a special facility and loaded into cylinders. The cylinders are sent to a gaseous diffusion plant,

where uranium is enriched for use as reactor fuel. The enriched uranium is then converted into

oxide powder, fabricated into fuel pellets, loaded into fuel rods, and bundled into assemblies at

a fuel fabrication facility. Bundled assemblies are then transported to nuclear power plants,

non-power reactor facilities, and naval propulsion reactors for use as fuel.

The NRC currently inspects these fuel facilities several times a year in a variety of

technical areas, such as chemical process, fire, nuclear criticality, radiation safety, and

safeguards. The goals of the new initiative are to focus inspections on activities where the

potential safety risks are greatest, obtain more objective indicators of safety performance,

increase public confidence in the NRC, and optimize regulatory effectiveness and efficiency.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in the Regency Conference Room

of the Doubletree Hotel at 1750 Rockville Pike from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Parking is limited;

however, the hotel is located adjacent to the Twinbrook Station on the Metro’s Red Line. Those

who seek background information on this initiative may obtain transcripts of last month’s

meeting on the website at www.nrc.gov/NMSS/FCSS/revised/fcindex.html
Interested persons can also access SECY 99-188, “Evaluation and Proposed Revision

of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Safety Inspection Program,” from the agency’s website, at

www.nrc.gov/NRC/COMMISSION/SECYS/index.html or from the Public Document Room,

telephone 202-634-3273.

###
### Part A—State Delivery of Services
§ 114.31 Restrictions. ( a ) *Mail importations.* Carnets shall not be accepted for importations by mail.
( b ) *Temporary importations.* Merchandise not entitled to temporary importation under bond shall not be imported under cover of an A.T.A. or TECRO/AIT carnet.
( c ) *Transportation in bond.* Except as provided in § 18.43 of this chapter, merchandise not entitled to transportation in bond shall not be transported under cover of a TIR carnet.
[T.D. 71-70, 36 FR 4491, Mar. 6, 1971, as amended by T.D. 85-180, 50 FR 42517, Oct. 21, 1985; T.D. 98-10, 63 FR 4168, Jan. 28, 1998]
<page>                                          EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter World
Currency Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter
Davis, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:  /s/Walter Davis

Name:   Walter Davis
Title:  President

Date:   May 15, 2006
Exhibit
32.2




CFO
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350*







In
connection with the Annual Report of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10--K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Carter Peters,
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
officer)of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.




/s/ Carter
Peters




Carter
Peters


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)





March 31,
2009





* A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Searched for **http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/UserFiles/works/pdfs/ri9560.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/UserFiles/works/pdfs/ri9560.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### § 500.209 Funding for the Program.

The Act provides funding for the costs incurred by the Government as a result of granting Guarantees under the Program. While pursuing the goals of the Act, it is the intent of the Board to minimize the cost of the Program to the Government. The Board will estimate the risk posed by the guaranteed loans to the funds appropriated for the costs of the Guarantees under the Program and operate the Program accordingly.
BOCA RESEARCH, INC.

                   EXHIBIT 11 - CALCULATION OF SHARES USED IN
                        DETERMINING NET INCOME PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)

                               September 30, 1998
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Three Months Ended           Nine Months Ended
                                                                  September 30, 1998           September 30, 1998
                                                                  ------------------           ------------------
<S>                                                               <C>                          <C>
Shares outstanding at January 1, 1998 .........................        8,725,079                    8,725,079
Shares issued January 1, 1998 in connection with
  the 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan .......................           16,578                       16,578
Shares issued July 1, 1998 in connection with
  the 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan .......................           14,830                        4,943
                                                                       ---------                    ---------
Weighted average shares outstanding ...........................        8,756,487                    8,746,600
                                                                       =========                    =========


                               September 30, 1997

                                                                  Three Months Ended           Nine Months Ended
                                                                  September 30, 1997           September 30, 1997
                                                                  ------------------           ------------------
Shares outstanding at January 1, 1997 .........................        8,678,883                    8,768,883
Shares issued January 1, 1997 in
  connection with the 1992 Employee
  Stock Purchase Plan .........................................           12,178                       12,178
Shares issued in connection with a
  non-qualified stock option plan .............................           22,167                       20,747
Shares issued July 1, 1997 in connection with
  the 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan .......................           11,851                        3,950
                                                                       ---------                    ---------
Weighted average shares outstanding ...........................        8,725,079                    8,715,758
                                                                       =========                    =========
</TABLE>

                                       1
§ 6.30 Form of requests. ( a ) An individual who seeks access to his or her record or to any information pertaining to the individual which is contained in a system of records should notify the system manager at the address indicated in the Federal Register notice describing the pertinent system. The notice should bear the legend “Privacy Act Request” both on the request letter and on the envelope. It will help in the processing of a request if the request letter contains the complete name and identifying number of the system as published in the Federal Register; the full name and address of the subject individual; a brief description of the nature, time, place, and circumstances of the individual's association with FEMA; and any other information which the individual believes would help the system manager to determine whether the information about the individual is included in the system of records. The system manager shall answer or acknowledge the request within 10 workdays of its receipt by FEMA.
( b ) The system manager, at his discretion, may accept oral requests for access subject to verification of identity.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.873 Originating goods. ( a ) *General.* A good will be considered an originating good under the OFTA when imported directly from the territory of a Party into the territory of the other Party only if: ( 1 ) The good is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of one or both of the Parties;
( 2 ) The good is a new or different article of commerce, as defined in § 10.872(i) of this subpart, that has been grown, produced, or manufactured in the territory of one or both of the Parties, is provided for in a heading or subheading of the HTSUS that is not covered by the product-specific rules set forth in General Note 31(h), HTSUS, and meets the value-content requirement specified in paragraph (b) of this section; or
( 3 ) The good is provided for in a heading or subheading of the HTSUS covered by the product-specific rules set forth in General Note 31(h), HTSUS, and: ( i ) ( A ) Each of the non-originating materials used in the production of the good undergoes an applicable change in tariff classification specified in General Note 31(h), HTSUS, as a result of production occurring entirely in the territory of one or both of the Parties; or
( B ) The good otherwise satisfies the requirements specified in General Note 31(h), HTSUS; and
( ii ) The good meets any other requirements specified in General Note 31, HTSUS.
( b ) *Value-content requirement.* A good described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section will be considered an originating good under the OFTA only if the sum of the value of materials produced in one or both of the Parties, plus the direct costs of processing operations performed in one or both of the Parties, is not less than 35 percent of the appraised value of the good at the time the good is entered into the territory of the United States.
( c ) *Combining, packaging, and diluting operations.* For purposes of this subpart, a good will not be considered a new or different article of commerce by virtue of having undergone simple combining or packaging operations, or mere dilution with water or another substance that does not materially alter the characteristics of the good. The principles and examples set forth in § 10.195(a)(2) of this part will apply equally for purposes of this paragraph.
Order filed September 27, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00621

- CV

____________ IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF GARY GOS INE AND EMMA MAE GOSINE

On Appeal from the 306th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15

- FD

- 2502



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed August 8, 2016. To date, the filing fee of $20 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedur e from paying costs has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P

. 5

. Therefore, the court issues the following order.
Appellant is ordered to pay th e filing fee in the amount of $20 5.00 to the c lerk
of this court on or before October 12, 2016. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be
dismissed.

PER CURIAM
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 134554 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134554 COA: 267338 Emmet CC: 05-002399-FH BRADFORD CARL ROSS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 14, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2007

Clerk
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.621 SBA guarantee of an Individual Certificate. ( a ) *Extent of SBA guarantee.* With respect to Individual Certificates, SBA guarantees to purchase from the Registered Holder the guaranteed portion of the loan for an amount equal to the unpaid principal and accrued interest due as of the date of SBA's purchase, less deductions for applicable fees. Unlike the SBA guarantee with respect to pooled loans, SBA does not guarantee timely payment on Individual Certificates.
( b ) *What triggers the SBA guarantee.* SBA's guarantee to the Registered Holder may be called upon when: ( 1 ) The Borrower remains in uncured default for 60 days on payments of principal or interest due on the note;
( 2 ) The Lender fails to send to the FTA on a timely basis payments it received from the Borrower; or
( 3 ) The FTA fails to send to the Registered Holder on a timely basis any payments it has received from the Lender.
( c ) *Full faith and credit.* SBA's guarantee to the Registered Holder is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with Spectrum Group International, Inc.'s (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:June 25, 2012/s/ Paul SothName:Paul SothTitle:Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 67.4 Proposed flood elevation determination. The Federal Insurance Administrator shall propose flood elevation determinations in the following manner: ( a ) Publication of the proposed flood elevation determination for comment in the Federal Register;
( b ) Notification by certified mail, return receipt requested, of the proposed flood elevation determination to the CEO; and
( c ) Publication of the proposed flood elevation determination in a prominent local newspaper at least twice during the ten day period immediately following the notification of the CEO.
[41 FR 46989, Oct. 26, 1976. Redesignated at 44 FR 31177, May 31, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 44553, Sept. 29, 1983; 49 FR 4751, Feb. 8, 1984] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For references to FR pages showing lists of flood elevation determinations, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*