alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-8 January 23, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC PROPOSES $55,000 FOR VIOLATIONS AT NINE MILE POINT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has cited Niagara Mohawk Power

Corporation for four violations of NRC requirements at the Nine Mile Point Nuclear

Station in Oswego, New York. The staff has proposed a $55,000 fine.

During inspections conducted between August and October, NRC inspectors

reviewed the circumstances surrounding four shipments of radioactive waste. Based

on those inspection findings, and information provided by Niagara Mohawk during a

December predecisional enforcement conference, the NRC staff has determined four

violations of NRC requirements occurred.

The violations include: the shipment of two core shroud samples that caused

radiation levels in the transportation vehicle's occupied space to exceed federal limits;

the incorrect shipment of a liner of low-level radioactive waste; two shipments, in 1995

and 1997, of radioactive material to a facility not licensed to receive the material;

While the actual safety consequences of these violations was low, NRC Region I

Administrator Hubert Miller said, “These violations indicate a lack of adequate oversight

of the radioactive materials handling and transportation program.” Miller also said the

fact that the three violations happened within a two-month period “indicates a potential

for greater safety significance.”

The NRC also recognized that the company took prompt and comprehensive

corrective actions to prevent recurrence.

Niagara Mohawk has 30 days to pay the fine or request in writing that all or part

be withdrawn.

#
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

101 Marietta St., Suite 2900, Atlanta, GA 30323

No. II-96-46 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Thursday, May 16, 1996)

Roger Hannah 404-331-7878

NRC STAFF TO HOLD ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE IN ATLANTA TO DISCUSS

FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT CONCERNS WITH SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY

Meeting Will Be Open To Observation By The Public

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will hold a

Predecisional Enforcement Conference in Atlanta at 1:00 p.m. on

Wednesday, May 22 to discuss NRC concerns related to the

technical specifications for the steam generators at Southern

Nuclear Operating Company’s Farley plant near Columbia, Alabama.

The meeting will be in the NRC offices at 101 Marietta

Street, N.W., Suite 2900.

NRC officials have regulatory concerns with an apparent

violation involving Farley plant employees not following their

technical specifications in checking steam generator tubes where

they go through a large metal plate that provides stability for

the tubes. The steam generators at the plant are the point where

primary water from the reactor heats secondary water surrounding

the tubes into steam.

The predecisional enforcement conference is open to

observation by the public under an NRC policy initiated in 1992

which opens every fourth such meeting to public scrutiny. The

meeting is between the NRC and the licensee, but NRC officials

are available at its conclusion to answer questions from

interested observers.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean

the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that

enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety

significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out

any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report;

and to enable the company to outline its proposed corrective

actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated

enforcement action, such as a civil penalty, will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials
at a later time.

Recorded information on upcoming open enforcement

conferences also will be available by calling 1-800-952-9674.

####
### §32. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 32 was editorially reclassified as section 6111 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.707 What conditions apply to loans by Intermediaries to Microloan borrowers? ( a ) *General.* Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (a), an Intermediary may only make Microloans to small businesses eligible to receive financial assistance under this part. A borrower may also use Microloan proceeds to establish a nonprofit childcare business. An Intermediary may not make Microloans to businesses with an Associate who is currently incarcerated, serving a sentence of imprisonment imposed upon adjudication of guilty, or to childcare businesses with an Associate who is currently on probation or parole for an offense against children. Proceeds from Microloans may be used only for working capital and acquisition of materials, supplies, furniture, fixtures, and equipment. SBA does not review Microloans for creditworthiness.
( b ) *Amount and maturity.* Generally, Intermediaries should not make a Microloan of more than $10,000 to any borrower. An Intermediary may not make a Microloan of more than $20,000 unless the borrower demonstrates that it is unable to obtain credit elsewhere at comparable interest rates and that it has good prospects for success. An Intermediary may not make a Microloan of more than $50,000, and no borrower may owe an Intermediary more than $50,000 at any one time. Each Microloan must be repaid within seven years.
( c ) *Interest rate.* The maximum interest rate that can be charged a Microloan borrower is: ( 1 ) On loans of more than $10,000, the interest rate charged on the SBA loan to the Intermediary, plus 7.75 percentage points; and
( 2 ) On loans of $10,000 or less, the interest rate charged on the SBA loan to the Intermediary, plus 8.5 percentage points.
[61 FR 3235, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 66 FR 47073, Sept. 11, 2001; 66 FR 47878, Sept. 14, 2001; 76 FR 63547, Oct. 12, 2011; 80 FR 34046, June 15, 2015; 85 FR 7651, Feb. 10, 2020; 85 FR 80588, Dec. 14, 2020; 87 FR 38909, June 30, 2022; 89 FR 34101, Apr. 30, 2024]
### §43b–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 43b–2 was editorially reclassified as section 5343 of this title.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-190 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, October 22, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received three reports from its Advisory

Committee on Reactor Safeguards following the Committee’s meetings September 2-4, and

September 30-October 2. The reports, in the form of letters, provide comments on the Nuclear

Energy Institute’s petition for rulemaking to amend paragraph (a) of 10 CFR 50.54, conditions

of licenses; the risk-informed pilot application for hydrogen monitoring at Arkansas Nuclear

One, Units 1 and 2; and the proposed priority rankings of generic safety issues.

Copies of the reports are available through the NRC’s Office of Public Affairs, the NRC’s

Internet homepage (http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW) and the Public Document Room in

Washington, D.C.

###
#### § 12.10 Regulations and orders of the Department of Agriculture.

The importation into the United States of plants and plant products is subject to regulations and orders of the Department of Agriculture restricting or prohibiting the importation of such plants and plant products. Customs officers and employees shall perform such functions as are necessary or proper on their part to carry out such regulations and orders of the Department of Agriculture and the provisions of law under which they are made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,626,572
<SECURITIES>                                15,651,416
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,770,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,978,082
<PP&E>                                     151,524,096
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,076,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             223,308,927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       45,799,756
<BONDS>                                    202,750,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 14,161,180
<COMMON>                                       237,758
<OTHER-SE>                                (43,336,971)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               223,308,927
<SALES>                                      1,193,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,892,185
<CGS>                                          875,994
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,265,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            82,800,141
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,463,736
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (112,460,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (112,460,182)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                             (112,460,182)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.87)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1

                                CONVERSION NOTICE

                  The undersigned, GNB Bank Panama S.A. pursuant to the
provisions of the Loan Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2002 entered into
among GNB Bank Panama S.A. (the "Lender"), Phone1, Inc., Phone1Globalwide, Inc.
("Global") and Globaltron Communications Corporation (the "Loan Agreement"),
hereby exercises its right to convert the Note and the Loan (as such terms are
defined in the Loan Agreement) and hereby surrenders a principal amount of the
Note and the Loan equal to $10,000,000, entitling the undersigned to receive
25,000,000 shares of the common stock of Global, par value .001 per share, and
requests that the certificates for such shares be issued in the name of GNB Bank
Panama S.A. and delivered to Lender as indicated by it to the transfer agent.

Dated:       December 19, 2002             GNB Bank Panama S.A.
             -----------------


                                           By:  /s/ Camilo Verastegui
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Name:  Camilo Verastegui
                                                Title: General Manager
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.609 Transshipment of non-originating cotton or man-made fiber apparel goods. ( a ) *General.* A good will not be considered eligible for preferential tariff treatment under an applicable TPL by reason of having undergone production that would enable the good to qualify for preferential tariff treatment if subsequent to that production the good: ( 1 ) Undergoes production or any other operation outside the territories of the Parties, other than unloading, reloading, or any other operation necessary to preserve the good in good condition or to transport the good to the territory of a Party; or
( 2 ) Does not remain under the control of customs authorities in the territory of a non-Party.
( b ) *Documentary evidence.* An importer making a claim for preferential tariff treatment under an applicable TPL may be required to demonstrate, to CBP's satisfaction, that the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section were met. An importer may demonstrate compliance with these requirements by submitting documentary evidence. Such evidence may include, but is not limited to, bills of lading, airway bills, packing lists, commercial invoices, receiving and inventory records, and customs entry and exit documents.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-98-19 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Monday, March 9, 1998)

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT VOGTLE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have announced the

assignment of John Zeiler as the new Senior Resident Inspector at the Vogtle Electric

Generating Plant near Waynesboro, Georgia.

Before being assigned to Vogtle, Zeiler worked as a resident inspector for two

years at Carolina Power & Light's H. B. Robinson nuclear power plant located near

Hartsville, South Carolina and for five years as a resident inspector at Duke Energy's

Catawba nuclear power plant near York, South Carolina. He joined the NRC in April

1987 as a reactor engineer in the NRC’s region office in Atlanta. Zeiler received a B.S.

degree in Nuclear Engineering and a Mechanical Engineering degree from North

Carolina State Univeristy in Raleigh, North Carolina.

Zeiler joins NRC Resident Inspectors Malcolm Widmann and Kathleen

O'Donohue at the Vogtle plant. The NRC inspectors at Vogtle can be reached at (706)-

554-9901.

#
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5291 

To delay the implementation of the modifications of exceptions for reporting 

of third party network transactions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 15, 2022 

Mrs. CAPITO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To delay the implementation of the modifications of 

exceptions for reporting of third party network transactions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DELAY IN MODIFICATION OF EXCEPTIONS FOR 

4 REPORTING OF THIRD PARTY NETWORK 

5 TRANSACTIONS. 

6 Section 9674(c)(1) of the American Rescue Plan of 

7 2021 is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2021’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘December 31, 2022’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.910 Dismissal. The Judge must dismiss the Size Standard Petition if: ( a ) The Size Standard Petition does not, on its face, allege specific facts that if proven to be true, warrant remand of the size standard;
( b ) The Petitioner is not adversely affected by the final rule revising, modifying, or establishing a size standard;
( c ) The Size Standard Petition is untimely or premature pursuant to § 134.903 or is not otherwise filed in accordance with the requirements in subparts A and B of this part; or
( d ) The matter has been decided or is the subject of adjudication before a court of competent jurisdiction over such matters.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division

Air Protection Branch

4244 International Parkway • Suite 120 • Atlanta • Georgia 30354

404/363-7000 • Fax: 404/363-7100

Judson H. Turner, Director

January 20, 2015

M E M O R A N D U M

To: Judson H. Turner, Director

Environmental Protection Division

From: Keith Bentley, Chief

Air Protection Branch

Subject: Responses to Comments Received Regarding Georgia’s Proposed SIP 

revision for the 15-county Atlanta nonattainment area emissions inventory for 

the 2008 8-Hour ozone NAAQS.

Section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires a current and comprehensive 

inventory of actual emissions for all sources of ozone precursors to be included in a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). To address this requirement, the Georgia Environmental 

Protection Division (GA EPD) prepared a 2011 annual and summer day emissions 

inventory for nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and carbon 

monoxide (CO) for the 15 counties in Atlanta (Bartow, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, 

DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Newton, Paulding, and 

Rockdale) that were designated “Marginal” nonattainment for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone 

NAAQS (75 ppb).

On November 7, 2014, the Air Protection Branch issued a public notice requesting 

comments on the proposed revision to Georgia’s SIP. The revision was described in the 

notice as follows: “The proposed State Implementation Plan revision includes the addition 

of the 15-county Atlanta Nonattainment Area Emissions Inventory for the 2008 8-Hour 

Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) as required by §182(a)(1) of the 

Clean Air Act. Additionally, Georgia EPD certifies that the existing Permit Program and 

Emissions Statements satisfy the requirements of §182(a)(2)(C) and §182(a)(3)(B), 

respectively.”. No oral comments were received during the public hearing held on 

December 9, 2014. Written comments were received from U.S. EPA and GreenLaw on 

behalf of The Sierra Club. The comments received and EPD’s responses are attached.

KB:EM

Attachment: Responses to U.S. EPA and GreenLaw Comments
[EXHIBIT 31.1]

          CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Paul Kravitz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Med Gen, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-
14) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
   ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
   including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
   others within those entities, particularly during the period in
   which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
   disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days
   prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
   "Evaluation Date"); and

c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
   about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
   procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation
     of internal controls which could adversely affect the
     registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
     financial data and have identified for the registrants
     auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
     management or other employees who have a significant role in
     the registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the
date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: January 20, 2006

By: /s/Paul Kravitz
   ----------------------------
   Paul Kravitz
   Chief Executive Officer
### §2065. Reimbursement of Senate day care center employees

#### (a) Cost of training classes, conferences, and related expenses

Notwithstanding section 1345 of title 31, the Secretary of the Senate may reimburse any individual employed by the Senate day care center for the cost of training classes and conferences in connection with the provision of child care services and for travel, transportation, and subsistence expenses incurred in connection with the training classes and conferences.

#### (b) Documentation

The Senate day care center shall certify and provide appropriate documentation to the Secretary of the Senate with respect to any reimbursement under this section. Reimbursements under this section shall be made from the appropriations account "MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS" within the contingent fund of the Senate on vouchers approved by the Secretary of the Senate.

#### (c) Regulations and limitations

Reimbursements under this section shall be subject to the regulations and limitations prescribed by the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate for travel and related expenses for which payment is authorized to be made from the contingent fund of the Senate.

#### (d) Effective date

This section shall be effective on and after October 1, 1996.

(Pub. L. 104–197, title I, §6, Sept. 16, 1996, 110 Stat. 2397.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 214e of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.3028 Issuance of negative origin determinations. If, as a result of an origin verification initiated under this subpart, CBP determines that a claim for preferential tariff treatment under this subpart should be denied, it will issue a determination in writing or via an authorized electronic data interchange system to the importer that sets forth the following: ( a ) A description of the good that was the subject of the verification together with the identifying numbers and dates of the import documents pertaining to the good;
( b ) A statement setting forth the findings of fact made in connection with the verification and upon which the determination is based; and
( c ) With specific reference to the rules applicable to originating goods as set forth in General Note 34, HTSUS, and in §§ 10.3013 through 10.3025, the legal basis for the determination.
MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting

From: Martha Keating

To: Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2008

- 0699

Date: August 6 , 2015

On Ju ly 24, 2015, representatives of EPA attended a meeting with Earthjustice

. The meeting was

held by videoconference. Attendees discussed the ozone National Ambient Air Q uality Standards

rulemaking. Earthjustice provided materials and they are attached

.

The following is a list of attendees and their affiliation:

Name Affiliation

Leslie Fields Sierra Club

Stephanie Maddin Earthjustice

Hilary Shelton NAACP

Dr. Yolanda White National Medical Association

Janet McCabe EPA/Office of Air and Radiation (OAR)

Deborah Jordan EPA/OAR

Mike Koerber EPA/Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

(OAQPS)

Erika Sa sser EPA/OAQPS

Karen Wesson EPA/OAQPS

# Copyrighted page(s) removed. Copyrighted

material is not available in Regulations.gov since

it may not be reproduced without consent of the

copyright holder.

Removed pages can be viewed at the USEPA

Docket Center, Public Reading Room.

Address: 1301 Constitution Ave, NW

Room 3334

Washington, DC 20004

Telephone: 202-566-1744

Email: docket-customerservice@epa.gov