alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.1021 Goods classifiable as goods put up in sets. Notwithstanding the specific rules set forth in General Note 33, HTSUS, goods classifiable as goods put up in sets for retail sale as provided for in General Rule of Interpretation 3, HTSUS, will not be considered to be originating goods unless: ( a ) Each of the goods in the set is an originating good; or
( b ) The total value of the non-originating goods in the set does not exceed: ( 1 ) In the case of textile or apparel goods, 10 percent of the adjusted value of the set; or
( 2 ) In the case of a good other than a textile or apparel good, 15 percent of the adjusted value of the set.
#### STATE ex rel BARON, Respondent, v. POPLEAU, Appellant.

(190 N. W. 881.)

(File No. 5151.

Opinion filed December 12, 1922.)

Appeal and Error — Briefs—Where No Briefs or Other Papers Piled, Appeal Deemed Abandoned.

Where the time as extended for filing briefs had elapsed, and no briefs, stipulations', or other papers had been filed, the appeal will be deemed abandoned, and the judgment and order appealed from will be affirmed.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Day County; Hon. B. A. War-ton, Judge.

Action 'by thie State, on the relation of Cora Baron, against Clemens Popleau. Judgment for relator, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*Waddell & Dougherty,*and *Lewis W. Bicknell,*all of Webster, for Appellant.

*Woodworth & Coomes,*of Webster, for Respondent. •

PER CURIAM.

On Majr 22, 1922, notice of appeal was filed in this court in the above-entitled action. By stipulation filed the time for serving and filing appellant’s brief was extended to August 16, 1922. Since that date no briefs; stipulations, or other papers have been filed by appellant.

Appellant being in default, the appeal will be deemed abandoned and the judgment andi order appealed from will be affirmed.

Note — Reported in 190 N. W. 881. See: American Key-Numbered Digest, Appeal and Error, Key-No. 773 (4), 3 C. J. See. 1607.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 212]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ212.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 725]]

Public Law 110-212
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
5815 McLeod Street in Lula, Georgia, as the ``Private Johnathon Millican 
        Lula Post <<NOTE: May 7, 2008 -  [H.R. 3532]>> Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PRIVATE JOHNATHON MILLICAN LULA POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5815 McLeod Street in Lula, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Private Johnathon Millican Lula Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Private 
Johnathon Millican Lula Post Office''.

    Approved May 7, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3532:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Feb. 12, considered and passed House.
            Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 32.01
                                                                 -------------


                                 CERTIFICATION

     I, Gary D. Halbert, the President of ProFutures, Inc., as general partner
of ProFutures Long/Short Growth Fund, L.P., certify that (i) the Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004 of ProFutures Long/Short Growth Fund, L.P.
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ProFutures
Long/Short Growth Fund, L.P.



                 PROFUTURES LONG/SHORT GROWTH FUND, L.P.

                 By: ProFutures, Inc., general partner



                 By:  /s/ Gary D. Halbert

                    ---------------------------------
                    Gary D. Halbert
                    President
                    March 30, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHANICE POWELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 423 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of December, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
No: II-23-006 April 6, 2023 

Contact: Dave Gasperson 404-997-4417 

NRC to Hold Virtual Public Meeting to Discuss

Hatch Nuclear Power Plant Safety Performance

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss the 2022 safety performance of the 

Edwin I. Hatch nuclear power plant during a virtual public meeting scheduled for April 11. The 

two-unit Hatch plant is located in southeastern Georgia and operated by Southern Nuclear 

Operating Co. 

The online meeting will begin at 4 p.m., Eastern time, via Microsoft Teams. The NRC staff

members responsible for inspecting the plant, including the resident inspectors based at the site, will 

give a short presentation followed by a question-and-answer session.

Members of the public without access to the web can listen to the meeting via telephone by 

calling (301) 576-2978, passcode 535403670#. Telephone participants will need to press *6 to 

unmute their phones to ask the NRC staff questions during that part of the meeting. 

The agency determined that the Hatch plant operated safely during 2022, and all inspection 

findings and performance indicators had very low safety significance. As a result, the plant remains 

under the NRC’s normal level of oversight. 

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow, or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or 

performance indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC 

oversight. 

NRC resident inspectors and other inspection specialists from the NRC Region II office in 

Atlanta perform inspections at the Hatch plant.

The annual assessment letter for the Hatch plant, including upcoming inspection plans, is 

available on the NRC website. Current performance information for Unit 1 and Unit 2 is available 

and updated quarterly.
#### § 111.93 Petition for relief from monetary penalty.

A broker or other person who receives a notice issued under § 111.92(b) may file a petition for relief from the monetary penalty in accordance with the procedures set forth in part 171 of this chapter.

[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by T.D. 00-57, 65 FR 53575, Sept. 5, 2000]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-137 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, September 17,

1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a

meeting on October 9 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will

begin at 8:30 a.m. in Room T-2B3, of the NRC's Two White Flint

North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. The Subcommittee on

Reactor Fuels, Onsite Fuel Storage, and Decommissioning will

discuss the basis of the NRC proposed fuel failure criterion for

high burnup conditions, and the behavior and adequacy of NRC fuel

codes under accident conditions. It also will hear the views of

the Electric Power Research Institute.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, will be described in a Notice of Meeting

published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

#
§ 122.136 Outgoing stores list. ( a ) *Preparation.* Two copies of a serially numbered outgoing stores list shall be prepared by the airline for all liquor and tobacco withdrawn from bonded or non-tax-paid stock and added to liquor kits. The outgoing stores list shall show the total number of bottles for each type liquor, the brand, and the size of each bottle.
( b ) *Use of copies.* The two copies of the outgoing stores list shall be used as follows: ( 1 ) One copy shall be placed and kept in the outgoing kits until the aircraft leaves the U.S.; and
( 2 ) One copy must be filed either with the outgoing cargo manifest (for aircraft required to clear) or with Customs before departing, as provided in § 122.133(c).
In both cases, the third copy of the inward stores list shall be filed with the outgoing stores list. (See § 122.133(c)).
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CERTIFIED PRIORITY RESTORATION 

a/a/o CHERYL COAKLEY,

Appellant,

v.

UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-245

[August 18, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Edward A. Garrison, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

502019CC000003XXXXMB and 502019AP000194CAXXMB.

Kristin E. Marrero and Karla Lockwood of The Mineo Salcedo Law Firm, 

P.A., Davie, for appellant.

Thomas A. Valdez and Vilma Martinez of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & 

Boyer, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

KUNTZ, J.

Certified Priority Restoration (CPR), an assignee of the insured, Cheryl 

Coakley, appeals the county court’s order granting final summary 

judgment to the insurer, Universal Insurance Company of North America. 

CPR raises one issue on appeal. CPR argues the county court erred 

when it granted summary judgment to the insurer based on the insurer’s 

accord and satisfaction affirmative defense. We addressed this argument 

in a case involving the same parties, and same insured, in an opinion also 

issued today. See Certified Prop. Restoration a/a/o Coakley v. Universal 

Ins. Co. of N. Am., Case. No. 4D21-374 (Fla. 4th DCA Aug. 18, 2021).

In the related opinion, we concluded that the insurer failed to establish 

accord and satisfaction. But we affirmed because the insurer argued a 

second affirmative defense that supported summary judgment. As in that

case, here, the insurer based its motion for summary judgment on two 

affirmative defenses. First, a defense that the insurer paid the total 
2

amount due. Second, a defense that summary judgment was required 

based on statutory accord and satisfaction. While the motions in the 

county court were similar, in this appeal, the insurer relies solely on the 

accord and satisfaction defense. As such, we must reverse. Our reversal 

is without prejudice to the insurer’s right to move for summary judgment 

on the defense that it paid the maximum amount due under the policy. 

We express no opinion on the merits of any such motion.

The county court’s summary judgment is reversed for further 

proceedings. 

Reversed and remanded.

DAMOORGIAN and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### Part A—Organization and Personnel
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 110–745 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 5811) TO AMEND 

TITLE 44, UNITED STATES CODE, TO REQUIRE PRESERVATION OF CERTAIN ELECTRONIC RECORDS BY FEDERAL AGENCIES, TO REQUIRE A 

CERTIFICATION AND REPORTS RELATING TO PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS, 

AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

JULY 8, 2008.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. WELCH, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1318] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1318, by a non-record vote, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5811, the ‘‘Electronic Message Preservation Act,’’ under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform. 

The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 

the bill except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The 

resolution provides that the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform shall be considered as adopted and the bill, as 

amended, shall be considered as read. The resolution waives all 

points of order against provisions of the bill. This waiver does not 

affect the point of order available under clause 9 of rule XXI (regarding earmark disclosure). 

The resolution provides one motion to recommit with or without 

instructions. Finally, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration until a 

time designated by the Speaker. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the rule waives all points of order against the bill and 

its consideration (except for those arising under clause 9 or 10 of 

rule XXI), the Committee is not aware of any specific points of 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with REPORTS
2 

order. The waivers of all points of order against the bill and 

against its consideration are prophylactic. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with REPORTS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 566 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 566

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 42 Main Street in Slatersville, Rhode Island, as the ``Specialist 
                   Matthew R. Turcotte Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 2021

  Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Whitehouse) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 42 Main Street in Slatersville, Rhode Island, as the ``Specialist 
                   Matthew R. Turcotte Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST MATTHEW R. TURCOTTE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 42 Main Street in Slatersville, Rhode Island, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Specialist Matthew R. Turcotte Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Matthew R. Turcotte Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
DECLARATI N OF ROBERT L. FLEETWOOD

I, the undersigned, Robert L. Fle

1. Mynane isRobertL. Fleet

knowledge ofthe matters set forth he

2. Together with my wife,

twood, PurSuant tO 28 U.S.C. § 1746, declare that:

OOd, I am over twenty-One yearS Of age, and I have personal

董

弓

ela A. Fleetwood, I own a company ca11ed Fleetwood

Services, LLC (血e ``Company”), Whic坤is Iocated in Dallas, Texas.

3. In January 2017, Complet Business Solutions Group (“CBSG’’) made a loan to the

any time prior to approving the Loan.

9. CBSG did notperfom apany time prior to approving the Loan.

10. CBSG did not request a de

Or at any Other time prior to approvmg

ll. CBSGdidnotassignme or

I declare under penalty of perjur

Ex。。ut。d 。n July _急2020, in Dallas

rsonal interview of me during the underuriting process or at

t schedule for the Company during the underwriting process

the Loans.

he Company a liaison.

that the foregoing is true and correct.

obert L. Fleetwood

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 29-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.550 Verification and justification of claim for preferential treatment. ( a ) *Verification.* A claim for preferential treatment made under § 10.510(a) of this subpart, including any statements or other information submitted to CBP in support of the claim, will be subject to such verification as the Center director deems necessary. In the event that the Center director is provided with insufficient information to verify or substantiate the claim, the Center director may deny the claim for preferential treatment. A verification of a claim for preferential tariff treatment may be conducted by means of one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Requests for information from the importer;
( 2 ) Written requests for information to the exporter or producer;
( 3 ) Requests for the importer to arrange for the exporter or producer to provide information directly to CBP;
( 4 ) Visits to the premises of the exporter or producer in Singapore, in accordance with procedures that the Parties adopt pertaining to verification; and
( 5 ) Such other procedures as the Parties may agree.
( b ) *Applicable accounting principles.* When conducting a verification of origin to which Generally Accepted Accounting Principles may be relevant, CBP will apply and accept the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles applicable in the country of production.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 1, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark L. Lemond, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  June 8, 2004 | By:  /s/ Mark L. LemondMark L. Lemond
President and
Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------





---
Exhibit 13.2



TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, C.C. Wei, President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (the Company), hereby certifies, to
his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  April 14, 2014



By:

/s/ C.C. WeiName:

C.C. WeiTitle:

President and Co-Chief Executive Officer




The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

WINVIEW IP HOLDINGS LLC, 

Appellant

v.

DRAFTKINGS INC., 

Appellee

______________________

2024-1653

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022-

01351.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 24-1653 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 06/28/2024
2 WINVIEW IP HOLDINGS LLC V. DRAFTKINGS INC.

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

June 28, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 28, 2024

Case: 24-1653 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 06/28/2024
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 18A/25 g

| | ISSN 1725-2466 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 18A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 49o anno25 gennaio 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2466

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 18A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

49o anno25 gennaio 2006

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Informazioni |
| | Autorità europea per la sicurezza alimentare |
| 2006/C 018A/1 | Invito a manifestare interesse a partecipare al comitato scientifico o ai gruppi di esperti scientifici dell’Autorità europea per la sicurezza alimentare (Il termine per manifestare il proprio interesse è stato prorogato al 17 febbraio 2006) | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

III   Informazioni

Autorità europea per la sicurezza alimentare

2006/C 018A/1

Invito a manifestare interesse a partecipare al comitato scientifico o ai gruppi di esperti scientifici dell’Autorità europea per la sicurezza alimentare (Il termine per manifestare il proprio interesse è stato prorogato al 17 febbraio 2006)

1

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

III Informazioni

Autorità europea per la sicurezza alimentare

| 25.1.2006 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 18/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2006

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 18/1

---

INVITO A MANIFESTARE INTERESSE A PARTECIPARE AL COMITATO SCIENTIFICO O AI GRUPPI DI ESPERTI SCIENTIFICI DELL’AUTORITÀ EUROPEA PER LA SICUREZZA ALIMENTARE

(Il termine per manifestare il proprio interesse è stato prorogato al 17 febbraio 2006)

(2006/C 18 A/01)

Conformemente alle informazioni pubblicate nella
  Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea C  289 A del 22 novembre 2005, pag. 6, il termine per l’invio degli atti di candidatura è il 7 gennaio 2006. Tuttavia, dati i problemi persistenti riguardo alla trasmissione degli atti di candidatura per via elettronica, in particolare durante l’ultima settimana del periodo utile, il termine per manifestare il proprio interesse è stato prorogato a venerdì 17 febbraio 2006.

Il presente invito è rivolto a esperti scientifici che desiderino essere considerati ai fini di una loro partecipazione in veste di membri del comitato scientifico o di uno dei gruppi di esperti scientifici dell’Autorità europea per la sicurezza alimentare, istituita in virtù del regolamento (CE) n. 178/2002 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 28 gennaio 2002, che stabilisce i principi e i requisiti generali della legislazione alimentare, istituisce l’Autorità europea per la sicurezza alimentare (EFSA) e fissa procedure nel campo della sicurezza alimentare. La sede permanente dell’Autorità è a Parma, Italia.

---