alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

Walnut Creek Field Office

1450 Maria Lane, Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5378

CONTACT: Mark Hammond FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

Office: (510) 975-0254 Oct. 4, 1996

Home: (415) 674-1024 RIV 96-55

Pager: (800) 916-4952

e-mail: mfh2@nrc.gov

NRC REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR TO DISCUSS

DIABLO CANYON AT NEWS CONFERENCE

L. Joe Callan, Regional Administrator of the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission's Region IV, will hold a news conference at

11 a.m. Thursday, Oct. 10, at the Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

Community Center at 6588 Ontario Road in San Luis Obispo.

Mr. Callan will discuss a Systematic Assessment of Licensee

Performance (SALP) report issued on Sept. 13 on the Diablo Canyon

Nuclear Power Plant, which is operated by PG&E, and other matters

of regulatory concern. The SALP report examines performance at

the two-reactor facility at Avila Beach over a two-year period.

The news conference will follow a meeting at which NRC and

PG&E officials will discuss the SALP report. That meeting, also

at the Community Center, will begin at 9 a.m. It will be open to

the public for observation; NRC officials will be available later

for questions.

#
### §4522. Deductions for withdrawal

When any Member or Delegate withdraws from his seat and does not return before the adjournment of Congress, he shall, in addition to the sum deducted for each day, forfeit a sum equal to the amount which would have been allowed by law for his mileage in returning home; and such sum shall be deducted from his compensation, unless the withdrawal is with the leave of the Senate or House of Representatives respectively.

(R.S. §41.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 40 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

R.S. §41 derived from Res. July 17, 1862, No. 68, §2, 12 Stat. 628.
Exhibit
      32.1





Ener1,
      Inc.


500
      West
      Cypress Creek Road-Suite 100


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309





August
        8,
        2006





Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549





Re:
      Certification Of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350





Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
      connection with the accompanying Amendment No. 4 to Quarterly Report on
      Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Ronald Stewart, Interim Chief
      Executive Officer of Ener1, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1)
            such
                Amendment No. 4 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc.,
                for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the
                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                Act of
                1934; and








2)
            the
                information contained in such Amendment No. 4 to  Quarterly
                Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended September
                30,
                2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                and results of operations of Ener1,
                Inc.








/s/
                Ronald Stewart
              
              Ronald
                Stewart
              Interim
                Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer and
              Duly
                Authorized Officer)











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
      retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.





This
      certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to Ener1, Inc.`s
      quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
      to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
      reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
      except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
      filing.
### **CHAPTER 12—CONTESTED ELECTIONS**

Sec.
381.
Definitions.
382.
Notice of contest.
383.
Response of contestee.
384.
Service and filing of papers other than notice of contest.
385.
Default of contestee.
386.
Deposition.
387.
Notice of depositions.
388.
Subpena for attendance at deposition.
389.
Officer and witness fees.
390.
Penalty for failure to appear, testify, or produce documents.
391.
Certification and filing of depositions.
392.
Record.
393.
Filing of pleadings, motions, depositions, appendixes, briefs, and other papers.
394.
Computation of time.
395.
Death of contestant.
396.
Allowance of party's expenses.
§ 352.21 Participating Federal agencies. ( a ) FEMA may call upon any Federal agency to participate in planning for the use of Federal facilities and resources in the licensee offsite emergency response plan.
( b ) FEMA may call upon the following agencies, and others as needed, to provide Federal technical assistance and Federal facilities and resources: ( 1 ) Department of Commerce;
( 2 ) Department of Defense;
( 3 ) Department of Energy;
( 4 ) Department of Health and Human Services;
( 5 ) Department of Housing and Urban Development;
( 6 ) Department of the Interior;
( 7 ) Department of Transportation;
( 8 ) Environmental Protection Agency;
( 9 ) Federal Communications Commission;
( 10 ) General Services Administration;
( 11 ) National Communications System;
( 12 ) Nuclear Regulatory Commission;
( 13 ) United States Department of Agriculture; and
( 14 ) Department of Veterans Affairs.
( c ) FEMA is the Federal agency primarily responsible for coordinating Federal assistance. FEMA may enter into Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) and other instruments with Federal agencies to provide technical assistance and to arrange for the commitment and utilization of Federal facilities and resources as necessary. FEMA also may use a MOU to delegate to another Federal agency, with the consent of that agency, any of the functions and duties assigned to FEMA. Following review and approval by OMB, FEMA will publish such documents in the Federal Register.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-131 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Friday, September 12,

1997)

NRC CONSIDERS APPLYING FEDERAL WRONGDOING

GUIDELINES TO AGREEMENT STATES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment

on a proposal to require Agreement States, as part of their

commitment to have a compatible regulatory program to protect

public health and safety, to establish requirements that address

deliberate misconduct of licensees similar to those of NRC.

Issues which would be addressed in misconduct requirements

include concerns such as wrongdoing by Agreement State licensees.

The proposal was prompted by a situation involving allegations of

secret cash payments by the former president of Envirocare of

Utah, a low-level radioactive waste facility, to the former

director of the Utah Bureau of Radiation.

Agreement States are states which have entered into

agreements with the NRC to assume regulatory authority over

certain radioactive materials. NRC periodically reviews Agreement

State programs to insure they are adequate to protect public

health and safety, and compatible with NRC regulations.

Agreement States are currently not required to have special

standards of conduct for their employees beyond those already

existing under state law in order for their program to be found

adequate and compatible by the NRC. Although NRC at present does

not systematically review any Agreement State codes of conduct

which might exist, the agency will refer to appropriate state

authorities any information it receives suggesting a particular

integrity concern could affect radiation safety.

The new proposal would require the states, as part of their

agreement, to adopt deliberate misconduct requirements similar to

those of NRC, and would enable the NRC to review those

requirements in order to find the state's program compatible.

Copies of the proposal are available at the NRC's Public

Document Room, 2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20037, or
from Spiros Droggitis, 301-415-2367. Comments may be submitted

to Mr. Droggitis at the Office of State Programs, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555.

###
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.551 Issuance of negative origin determinations. If, as a result of an origin verification initiated under § 10.550 of this subpart, CBP denies a claim for preferential treatment made under § 10.510(a) of this subpart, it will issue a determination in writing or via an authorized electronic data interchange system to the importer that sets forth the following: ( a ) A description of the good that was the subject of the verification together with the identifying numbers and dates of the import documents pertaining to the good;
( b ) A statement setting forth the findings of fact made in connection with the verification and upon which the determination is based; and
( c ) With specific reference to the rules applicable to originating goods as set forth in General Note 25, HTSUS, and in §§ 10.530 through 10.543 of this subpart, the legal basis for the determination.
#### § 206.31 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to describe the process leading to a Presidential declaration of a major disaster or an emergency and the actions triggered by such a declaration.
§ 70.7 Notice of Letter of Map Amendment. ( a ) The Federal Insurance Administrator, shall not publish a notice in the Federal Register that the FIRM for a particular community has been amended by letter determination pursuant to this part unless such amendment includes alteration or change of base flood elevations established pursuant to part 67. Where no change of base flood elevations has occurred, the Letter of Map Amendment provided under §§ 70.5 and 70.6 serves to inform the parties affected.
( b ) [Reserved]
Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For a list of communities issued under this section and not carried in the CFR see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids Section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 566 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.566

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   42 Main Street in Slatersville, Rhode Island, as the ``Specialist 
                   Matthew R. Turcotte Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SPECIALIST MATTHEW R. TURCOTTE POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 42 Main Street in Slatersville, Rhode Island, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Specialist Matthew R. Turcotte Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Matthew R. Turcotte Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Margaret P. Havery, Appellant, v. Alfred Wagstaff, as Executor, etc., Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Sunburst Acquisitions III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the
period ending August 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Michael R. Quinn, Principal Financial Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Michael R. Quinn



Michael R. Quinn,

 Principal Financial Officer and Director

May 24, 2004
# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 09-3071 September Term, 2014 1: 05-c r-003 67-RMC-1 Filed O n: Feb ruary 6, 20 15 United Sta tes o f

Am erica, App ellee
v . Jaron Brice, a lso kno w n a s Jay Bird, also known as Da ddy, also known as B ird, also known as Ja y ,

App ellant
BEFORE: Kavana ugh, Circuit Ju dge; W illiams a nd Sen telle, Sen ior Circuit

Judges O R D E R It is ORDERED , on the cou rt’s ow n m otion , th at t he majority op inion and op inion concu rring in th e jud gmen t reissue d o n May 16, 20 14, be repla ced w ith th e a me nde d opin ions issu ed here in th is dat e. T he Clerk is directed to issue a n a me nde d jud gmen t.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Jenn ifer M. Clark Depu ty Cl erk
EXHIBIT 32

Securities
and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eastern American Natural Gas Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a
separate disclosure document.

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.,
Trustee, Trustee for Eastern American Natural Gas
TrustBy:

/s/ MIKE ULRICHVice PresidentThe Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.


Date:
May 7, 2012

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6024
GREGORY MARSHALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SEWALL S MITH, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM, SR., Commissioner; JAMES PEGUES, Major; M. MORGAN, Lieutenant; MAJOR MIDDLETON; FREDERICK JONES, Officer, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-839-B) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 28, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Audrey J. S. Carrion, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Marshall v. Smith , No. CA-94-839-B (D. Md. Nov. 21, 1995).We deny the motion for oral argument and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Date: 

### I /1 

# s /()__ 0 

### 1



# ~ Meeting: 

# Not<..thue..n SIULt,Ct._


# ~ {) 

# fYlcdu-lJ Rule(s) Discussed: Written Materials? Yes/No Name Organization Phone N u rn ber 

# J

**~tt-"** 

### J)vY1 ft:.Lp:? tJS./t{i)AfV 

### ji)v.J.///<? 

### J
**v''"'~c? ~vvt**  **!~Jr./ e-o~**  . (;. '/7)v ;,t? **·r~~l?** )2-'7o **~sl.../.** 2.



# ~~u} " 

# /Zo c f\ 11 f;'-p roe '\ 

### <:9 4 

### c-/ - (_o h.

**~** 

## i-r>rrc.... (_ 0\., 

### "'+ ,/ 2o f 

## 'i ") <( 2. 7 7 0 

## Urt-fcilt, **8erJ/7~-jf-** / 

### 5.36 <J/3 -936.2.- Ct:./( 

### NJ40mo

**~30 .9.';J-if.~q360**  )( /Ol.. 

# SCIY21 

# Lo h 

### q 

## rn 

## i r 

### e- **!V~/J ~fi1**  

### D 530 

### - ..17'1-9:360 "'!06 

## (eM\


# p~ 

# f-fA
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 98-29 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Victor Dricks Thursday, July 9, 1998)

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (888)625-1086

E-MAIL: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM

TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATION AT WNP-2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a

predecisional enforcement conference July 13 with officials of

the Washington Public Power Supply System, the operators of the

WNP-2 nuclear power plant near Richland, Washington, to discuss

an apparent violation of NRC requirements.

The conference will begin at 10:45 a.m. at NRC’s Region IV

office in Arlington, Texas. The meeting will be open to public

observation; NRC officials will be available afterwards for

questions.

The apparent violation was identified during an NRC special

inspection conducted February 9-12, involving personnel from

Region IV, the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation from NRC

headquarters in Rockville, Maryland, and the Oak Ridge National

Laboratory in Tennessee

The alleged violation involves the adequacy of methods used

in calculating the behavior of fuel under some operating

conditions. As a result, under some scenarios that could have

arisen between 1991 and 1997, some fuel in the reactor core could

have overheated, reducing the safety margin necessary to prevent

fuel damage. These conditions did not arise, however.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference

does not mean that NRC has made a final determination that

violations did occur or that enforcement action, such as a

monetary fine, will be taken. The purpose of the meeting is to

discuss the apparent violations, their causes and safety

significance, and to provide Public Power Supply officials with

an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in

the NRC inspection report and present corrective actions that

have been taken.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated
enforcement action will be made at this conference. Those

decisions will be made by senior NRC officials at a later date.

##
§ 133.13 Documents and fee to accompany application. ( a ) *Documents.* The application shall be accompanied by a statement of the owner, partners, or principal corporate officer, and by statements by at least two other persons not associated with or related to the applicant but having actual knowledge of the facts, stating that to his best knowledge and belief: ( 1 ) The applicant has used the trade name in connection with the class or kind of merchandise described in the application for at least 6 months;
( 2 ) The trade name is not identical or confusingly similar to any other trade name or registered trademark used in connection with such class or kind of merchandise; and
( 3 ) The applicant has the sole and exclusive right to the use of such trade name in connection with the merchandise of that class or kind.
( b ) *Fee.* The application shall be accompanied by a fee of $190 for each trade name to be recorded. A check or money order shall be made payable to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
[T.D. 72-266, 37 FR 20678, Oct. 3, 1972, as amended by T.D. 75-160, 40 FR 28791, July 9, 1975]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,982,291
<SECURITIES>                                 9,950,774
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,685,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                   274,885
<INVENTORY>                                  4,490,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,311,736
<PP&E>                                      18,761,730
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,024,598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,183,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,471,442
<BONDS>                                      7,993,160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       255,453
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,450,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,183,428
<SALES>                                      8,882,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,882,933
<CGS>                                        7,433,279
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,904,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (91,677)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,904
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             321,727
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,689,915)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,689,915)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,689,915)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)


</TABLE>