alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.601 Retail packaging materials and containers.

(a) *Effect on tariff shift rule.* Packaging materials and containers in which a good is packaged for retail sale, if classified with the good for which preferential tariff treatment under the CAFTA-DR is claimed, will be disregarded in determining whether all non-originating materials used in the production of the good undergo the applicable change in tariff classification set out in General Note 29(n), HTSUS.

(b) *Effect on regional value content calculation.* If the good is subject to a regional value content requirement, the value of such packaging materials and containers will be taken into account as originating or non-originating materials, as the case may be, in calculating the regional value content of the good.

# Example 1.

Guatemalan Producer A of good C imports 100 non-originating blister packages to be used as retail packaging for good C. As provided in § 10.596(a)(1) of this subpart, the value of the blister packages is their adjusted value, which in this case is $10. Good C has a regional value content requirement. The United States importer of good C decides to use the build-down method, RVC = ((AV-VNM)/AV) × 100 (*see* § 10.595(b) of this subpart), in determining whether good C satisfies the regional value content requirement. In applying this method, the non-originating blister packages are taken into account as non-originating. As such, their $10 adjusted value is included in the VNM, value of non-originating materials, of good C.

# Example 2.

Same facts as in Example 1, except that the blister packages are originating. In this case, the adjusted value of the originating blister packages would *not* be included as part of the VNM of good C under the build-down method. However, if the U.S. importer had used the build-up method, RVC = (VOM/AV) × 100 (*see* § 10.595(c) of this subpart), the adjusted value of the blister packaging would be included as part of the VOM, value of originating material.
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 693 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for the 

halt in pension payments for Members of Congress sentenced for certain offenses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 693 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Congressionally 

3 Obligated Recurring Revenue Used as Pensions To Incar4 cerated Officials Now Act’’ or the ‘‘No CORRUPTION 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FORFEITURE OF PENSION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8332(o) of title 5, United 

8 States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4), (5), and 

10 (6) as paragraphs (5), (6), and (7), respectively; 

11 (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol12 lowing: 

13 ‘‘(4)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), an individual 

14 convicted of an offense described in paragraph (2) shall 

15 not be eligible to receive any payment of an annuity pursu16 ant to the retirement system under this subchapter or 

17 chapter 84, except that this sentence applies only to such 

18 payments based on service rendered as a Member (irre19 spective of when rendered). 

20 ‘‘(B) If the conviction of an individual described in 

21 subparagraph (A) is overturned on appeal by a court of 

22 competent jurisdiction, the individual shall receive pay23 ments that the individual would have received but for the 

24 application of subparagraph (A). 

25 ‘‘(C) This paragraph applies only to a conviction that 

26 occurs after the date of enactment of the No Congression-
3 

†S 693 ES

1 ally Obligated Recurring Revenue Used as Pensions To 

2 Incarcerated Officials Now Act.’’; 

3 (3) in paragraph (5)(B)(i), as so redesignated, 

4 by striking ‘‘paragraph (5)’’ and inserting ‘‘para5 graph (6)’’; and 

6 (4) in paragraph (6), as so redesignated, by 

7 striking ‘‘paragraph (4)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘para8 graph (5)(B)’’. 

9 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

10 Section 719(e)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is 

11 amended by striking ‘‘section 8332(o)(5)’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘section 8332(o)(6)’’. 

Passed the Senate December 8, 2021. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 693 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide 

other purposes. Congress sentenced for certain offenses, and for for the halt in pension payments for Members of
Exhibit 31.1

SHOE CARNIVAL, INC.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

|I, Mark L. Lemond, certify
    that:
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|1.                                  
|                                    
|2.                                  
|                                    
|3.                                  
|                                    
|4.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|5.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    

|Date: | September 11,
      2008 | By:/s/ Mark L. Lemond         | 
|----- | ------------------------ | ----------------------------- | 
|      |                          | Mark L.
      Lemond          | 
|      |                          | President
      and           | 
|      |                          | Chief Executive
      Officer | 

---
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-16 February 26, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC BANS FORMER TEMPLE UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGIST FROM

NRC LICENSED ACTIVITIES FOR ONE YEAR

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has banned the former

assistant chief nuclear medicine technologist at Temple

University Hospital in Philadelphia from taking part in NRClicensed activities for a year.

The action against Gary Isakoff stems from an NRC

investigation which found that, in September 1996, Mr. Isakoff

deliberately falsified a weekly survey for removable

contamination in the hospital’s “hot lab,” where radioactive

materials are used. In addition, investigators learned, he asked

a subordinate to falsely claim that she had conducted the

required surveys. The NRC also found that Mr. Isakoff repeatedly

willfully failed to record, or inaccurately recorded, information

about the calibration of doses to patients on dose-dispensing

forms.

In the order banning Mr. Isakoff, Malcolm R. Knapp, NRC

Deputy Executive Director for Regulatory Effectiveness, said, the

former hospital employee’s actions ”have raised serious doubts as

to whether he can be relied upon to comply with NRC requirements

and to sumbit and maintain complete and accurate information and

records.”

The order restricts Mr. Isakoff’s involvement in licensed

activities for one year, and requires that for one year

thereafter he provide notice to the NRC of any offers of

employment involving NRC-licensed activities.

NRC cited Temple University Hospital in February 1998 for a

violation caused by Mr. Isakoff’s failure to conduct the weekly

survey and his falsification of a survey record. The hospital

holds an NRC license authorizing the use of radioactive material

for medical use and research and development.

Mr. Isakoff may request a hearing on the action within 20

days.

#
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23641]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13.
    Bureau: International Trade Administration.
    Title: BISNIS FinanceLink.
    Agency Form Number: ITA-4145P.
    OMB Number: 0625-0231.
    Type of Request: Regular Submission.
    Burden: 8.
    Number of Respondents: 50.
    Avg. Hours Per Response: 10 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: The International Trade Administration's Business 
Information Service for the Newly Independent States offers business 
intelligence and counseling to U.S. companies seeking to export or 
invest in the countries of the Former Soviet Union. One of the 
essential components of BISNIS's services is assisting companies in 
locating suitable financing for exports. Often, official sources, such 
as the Export-Import Bank of the United States, cannot handle all 
requests for a variety of reasons. FinanceLink is an internet-based 
service to facilitate contact between exporters and financing agencies. 
Exporters fill out a form giving relevant details about the desired 
transaction and submit it via Internet to BISNIS; BISNIS will, in turn, 
distribute the information collected to potential financing agencies. 
The intention is to provide a service that benefits both exporters and 
financing agencies.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profits.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit, 
voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-7340.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, 
Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and Constitution, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230. E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#74103c0d1a111f34101b175a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="65012d1c0b000e25010a064b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent via e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#efab8e99868bb0bd809c9b848a9daf80828dc18a809fc1888099"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a0e2b3c232e151825393e212f380a252728642f253a642d253c">[email protected]</span></a> or 
fax (202) 395-7285, within 30 days of publication of this Federal 
Register notice.

    Dated: October 18, 2004.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-23641 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-FP-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-200 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, November 4, 1998)

NRC STATEMENT ON NUCLEAR PLANT OPERATIONAL SAFEGUARDS PROGRAM

In response to a number of press queries, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

today issued the following statement about the status of its Operational Safeguards

Response Evaluations program:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has not diminished its security

requirements at commercial nuclear power plants around the country. Published

reports asserting the NRC has eliminated the only program for testing the ability of

nuclear power plants to repel terrorists are misleading. Such assertions fail to account

for continuing NRC inspections and required compliance verification programs

conducted by the licensees to assure the continued effectiveness of security measures.

The program in question, the Operational Safeguards Response Evaluations

(OSRE), along with a predecessor program, over a period of more than 10 years has

tested security arrangements at all of the 100-plus commercial nuclear power plants in

the United States. Useful insights on weaknesses were uncovered and addressed as a

result of these NRC initiatives.

Nonetheless, the NRC has recently undertaken a review of the appropriate role

of performance testing in validating security at commercial nuclear power plants within

the overall context of assuring an adequate level of protection. The results of the

analysis are currently being assessed, and the agency will make appropriate

adjustments to the existing security program, as warranted.

###
122 STAT. 728 PUBLIC LAW 110–215—MAY 7, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3936: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Feb. 28, considered and passed House. 

Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–215 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 116 Helen 

Highway in Cleveland, Georgia, as the ‘‘Sgt. Jason Harkins Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SGT. JASON HARKINS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 116 Helen Highway in Cleveland, Georgia, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Sgt. Jason Harkins Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sgt. Jason Harkins Post Office Building’’. 

Approved May 7, 2008. 

May 7, 2008 

[H.R. 3936] 


jbridges on POFP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-106 July 7, 2000

NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON ISSUES; PLANS RULEMAKING FOR

PACKAGING AND TRANSPORTING RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on issues to be considered in

revising its regulations on the packaging and transportation of radioactive material.

The NRC’s current transportation regulations are based, in part, on those developed by the

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), a worldwide standards-setting organization. The IAEA

periodically revises its transportation standards to reflect scientific and technical advances. The NRC

periodically updates its own regulations to be compatible with those of IAEA.

Some of the issues to be discussed during the rulemaking process are administrative, while

others include technical issues such as: testing requirements for integrity of packages used to transport

radioactive material, package design requirements for aircraft transport, thresholds at which materials

must be transported under hazardous material requirements, and double-containment requirements for

plutonium shipments. These issues will be described in greater detail in a Federal Register notice to be

published shortly.

To obtain widespread input on these issues, the NRC has scheduled three public meetings to be

held around the country. The dates and locations for the meetings are:

ˇ August 10 in Rockville, Maryland, in the auditorium of the agency’s Two White Flint North

building, 11545 Rockville Pike, from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m;

ˇ September 20 in Atlanta, Georgia, at the J.W. Marriott Hotel, 3300 Lenox Road Northeast,

from 6:00 until 10:00 p.m;

ˇ September 26 in Oakland, California, at the Oakland Federal Building, Edward R. Roybal

Auditorium and Conference Center, at 1301 Clay Street, from 6:00 until 10:00 p.m.

Additionally, comments may be electronically submitted on the agency’s web site, at

http://ruleforum.llnl.gov or submitted by mail to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC, 20555, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications staff.
Staff plans to incorporate public comments and submit a proposed rule to the Commission next

March.

##
EXHIBIT 32.1



                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diasense, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Keith R. Keeling, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  February 14, 2006



/s/ Keith R. Keeling

Keith R. Keeling
Chief Executive Officer
10/4/21, 12:04 PM Dame Michael 

Chock Koine 

Chuck Bradley 

Oh I know , but I debunked it all on my page already. 

Jan 30, 2020, 9:59 AM 

Dame Michael 

The other question is if was so quick to say all that to aaron, who else has he sent that too 

Jan 30, 2020, 9:58 AM 

Dame Michael 

Anything to get rid of shay 

Jan 30, 2020, 9:22 AM 

Dame Michael 

Jan 30, 2020, 9:22 AM 

Chuck Bradley 

Cool, the big ones like areas, uspsa etc are ones he can hurt. If he pops up let me know. Appreciate 

all you're help. 

Jan 30, 2020, 9:19 AM 

Dame Michael 

I haven't seen him in any of the fb groups I'm in 

Jan 30, 2020, 9:18 AM 

Dame Michael 

Troll chat is dead 

Jan 30, 2020, 9:17 AM 

file:///C:/Users/HaganW/Desktop/Documents from C. Bradley/akaithumb/F /FBMESSENGER/facebook-chuckdvdmessageshnbox/damemichael... 12/276 

SCI 000913 CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-141 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Friday, November 12, 2004.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04-23569  Filed 10-18-04; 11:51 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
New Source Review (NSR) 

Program Basics

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

(OAQPS)

RTP, NC
Tribal Air Quality 

Management Process

Implement Control Strategies

-Title V and other Permits

•Surveillance and 

•Enforcement

Evaluate Air Quality

•Emissions Inventory Data

•Ambient Air Monitoring Data

Choose Control Strategies

-Voluntary programs

-Some strategies may be 

regulatory

Determine Necessary

Emissions Reductions

•Modeling

Set Air Quality Goals
What are the benefits of the 

NSR program?

 A key tool for enabling nonattainment 

areas to reach attainment and for 

maintaining the National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS)

 Protects/Preserves clean air in national 

parks and wilderness areas, as well as 

other attainment areas
What are the requirements of 

the NSR program?

 New or modified sources get permits prior to 

construction

 Sources install state-of-the-art control 

technology

 Sources/agencies make sure air quality

impacts from the source will be acceptable
Where does NSR fit into the 

process?

 Part of a TIP or a FIP

 Tool to provide source specific 

requirements on new or modified 

sources

 Allows for Economic growth and 

improvements or protection of air quality 
6

What are the components of the 

NSR program?

New Source Review

(NSR)

Program

Major NSR

in attainment

areas (PSD)

Major NSR

in nonattainment

areas (NA NSR)

Minor NSR

in all areas
7

PSD Permit Requirements

 Main requirements:

• Install Best Available Control Technology (BACT)

• Perform air quality analysis to assess impacts on air 

quality

• Perform class I area analysis to assess impacts on

national parks and wilderness areas 

• Perform additional impacts analysis

• Allow for opportunities for public involvement
8

NA NSR Permit Requirements

 Main requirements:

• Install Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER) 

technologies

• Obtain emission offsets

• Perform alternative sites analysis

• Show statewide facility compliance w/air regulations

• Allow for opportunities for public involvement
9

Minor NSR Permit Requirements

 CAA is silent on specific requirements

• Minimal requirements found on 40CFR 51.160-51.164

 New sources and modifications cannot violate 

NAAQS or FIP/SIP/TIP control strategies, nor 

interfere with attainment or maintenance of the 

NAAQS

 State program requirements vary greatly
Contacts

Laura McKelvey

Phone: 919-541-5497

mckelvey.laura@epa.gov

Raj Rao

Phone: 919-541-5344

rao.raj@epa.gov

Jessica Montañez

Phone: 919-541-3407

montanez.jessica@epa.gov