alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with Spectrum Group International, Inc.'s (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:June 25, 2012/s/ Paul SothName:Paul SothTitle:Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### §677. Separability

If any provision of this chapter, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this chapter, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 91–596, §32, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1619.)
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                               44,983,450
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     38,977,975
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       38,977,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   340,391
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                           38,637,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         38,977,975
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     (4,021,022)
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      1,418,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (5,439,311)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (5,439,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                         (5,439,311)
<EPS-BASIC>                              (304.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (304.83)


</TABLE>
### §§60g, 60g–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–510, title IV, §477(a)(1), (2), Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1195

Section 60g, acts Dec. 20, 1944, ch. 617, §1, 58 Stat. 831; June 23, 1949, ch. 238, §4, 63 Stat. 265, related to clerk hire for Members and Resident Commissioner, rearrangements or changes in salaries and number of employees, maximum and minimum salaries, prohibition against increase in aggregate amount of salaries, required compensation rate to be in multiples of five, and certification of rearrangements or changes of salary schedules.

Section 60g–1, acts July 2, 1954, ch. 455, title I, 68 Stat. 401; Aug. 5, 1955, ch. 568, §11(a), 69 Stat. 509; Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 938, §1(a), 70 Stat. 990; Aug. 10, 1961, Pub. L. 87–130, §103, 75 Stat. 334; July 27, 1965, Pub. L. 89–90, §103, 79 Stat. 81; Aug. 27, 1966, Pub. L. 89– 545, §103, 80 Stat. 369, related to increase in basic rates for clerk hire for House Members and Resident Commissioner, including the case of a constituency having a population of five hundred thousand or more, limited basic rate to $7,500 per annum and to one person at any one time.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective immediately prior to noon on Jan. 3, 1971, see section 601(1) of Pub. L. 91–510, set out as an Effective Date of 1970 Amendment note under section 4301 of this title.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-37 April 10, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Special Projects Office

for Millstone will meet with officials of Northeast Utilities on

Thursday, April 17, to discuss NU's schedule for restarting the

Millstone units. The meeting, which is open to the public for

observation, will begin at 12:30 in the Leland F. Sillin, Jr.

Nuclear Training Center, at the Millstone site.

#
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 20-80049-WPD 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

LEONARD SHEMTOB and 

STRONG SUPPLEMENTS, LLC, 

 Defendants. 

 / 

Notice of Appearance 

Please enter the appearance of Stephen J. Gripkey as counsel for the United States 

in the above-entitled case. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 ARIANA FAJARDO ORSHAN 

 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 

 GUSTAV W. EYLER 

DIRECTOR 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

CONSUMER PROTECTION BRANCH 

 /s/ Stephen J. Gripkey 

STEPHEN J. GRIPKEY 

Court ID A5502620 

Trial Attorney 

Consumer Protection Branch 

U.S. Department of Justice 

P.O. Box 386 

Washington, D.C. 20044-0386 

(202) 307-0048 

stephen.gripkey@usdoj.gov 

Case 9:20-cr-80049-WPD Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/03/2020 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on September 3, 2020, I caused a copy of the foregoing document to 

be filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court by way of the CM/ECF system. Notice of this 

filing will be sent to all counsel of record by operation of CM/ECF system. Parties may access 

this filing through the CM/ECF system. 

/s/ Stephen J. Gripkey 

Stephen J. Gripkey 

 Trial Attorney 

 U.S. Department of Justice 

Case 9:20-cr-80049-WPD Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/03/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §60–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 60–2 was editorially reclassified as section 4724 of this title.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-120 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, July 15, 1998)

NRC ORDER TO FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CONFIRMS FIRE BARRIER

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AT ST. LUCIE UNIT 1

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a confirmatory order to Florida

Power & Light Company confirming its commitment to complete Thermo-Lag fire

barrier corrective actions at its St. Lucie nuclear power plant Unit 1 by the end of its

1999 refueling outage. The plant is located near Ft. Pierce, Florida.

Sam Collins, Director of the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, said

the order was issued because of concern “that some licensees may not be making

adequate progress toward resolving the plant-specific issues, and that some

implementation schedules may either be too tenuous or too protracted.”

Thermo-Lag is a fire barrier material manufactured and supplied by Thermal

Science, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, and has been used to provide fire resistance to

wiring and equipment at nuclear plants. The NRC has been concerned that ThermoLag 330-1 fire barrier material installed by some of its licensees may not provide the

intended level of fire protection and that licensees thus may not be meeting regulatory

requirements. Between 1992 and 1994, the NRC staff issued letters to all nuclear

utilities asking licensees to submit plans and schedules for resolving the issue. All

licensees with Thermo-Lag fire barriers have implemented around-the-clock “fire

watches,” using workers to patrol vital plant areas on a regular basis to watch for signs

of fire until corrective actions have been completed.

In a letter to Florida Power officials, Collins noted that NRC has met with

licensees to review their progress in completing implementation of their fire barrier

programs, but remains concerned about slow progress on resolution of the issue.

Florida Power & Light Co. was one of the licensees with which NRC has

periodically held meetings. At these meetings, the NRC reviewed Florida Power & Light

Co.’s schedule for Thermo-Lag corrective actions and concluded they are reasonable.
-2-

The company formally agreed June 3 to the terms of the confirmatory order. ThermoLag corrective actions are complete for Unit 2 and about 65 percent complete for Unit 1.

About 20 other plants have received or will soon receive similar orders in the

coming months.

##

Additional information on Thermo-Lag fire barriers can be be found on the NRC

Homepage at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/gmo/tip/tip9826.htm
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 10, 2022

NO. 03-21-00270-CV

Scott Ogle, Appellant

v.

Damon C. O’Gan, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on May 26, 2021. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Appellant shall pay all costs 

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-023 March 2, 2001

NRC RECEIVES CONSTRUCTION APPLICATION FOR PROPOSED

MIXED OXIDE FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received an application to construct a mixed oxide

(MOX) fuel fabrication facility on the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site near Aiken, South

Carolina. The agency will conduct an initial review of the application to ensure it is complete, and if

so, will begin a more detailed technical review in about a month.

The Department of Energy plans to construct a MOX fuel plant through a contract with the

consortium of Duke Engineering & Services, COGEMA Inc., and Stone & Webster (known as DCS).

If NRC grants the license, DCS could build and operate a MOX facility that would convert surplus

weapons-grade plutonium oxide, supplied by the Department of Energy, into fuel for use in

commercial nuclear reactors. The plutonium in the fuel would be used in a once-through process, to

render it essentially inaccessible and unattractive for weapons use. Commercial nuclear power plants

in the United States currently use uranium as fuel; the mixed oxide fuel would be a combination of

uranium and plutonium.

A separate announcement will describe the process for the environmental review and a

schedule for public meetings, which will be held to allow interested members of the community to

provide information and comments to assist the agency in its environmental evaluation.

An opportunity for a hearing will be announced in a Federal Register notice following NRC’s

acceptance review of the application.

A copy of the application will be available on the agency’s web site, at

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/NMSS/MOX/index.html and through ADAMS, the Agencywide Documents

Access and Management System.

###
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# IE Position - Unduly Restricted Access of Female NRC Inspectors to Radiation Areas

## HPPOS-055 PDR-9111210231

See the memorandum from J. H. Sniezek to B. H. Grier (and others) dated October 2, 1980.

It is an IE position that states each female NRC inspector has to read and be familiar with Regulatory Guide (RG) 8.13. Therefore, licensees shall not restrict access of an NRC inspector because of requirements considered to be imposed by 10 CFR 19.12 regarding instructions to workers on prenatal exposure.

During NRC onsite inspections, several licensees imposed additional restrictions on the access of female NRC inspectors to radiation areas. These restrictions appeared to be honest attempts on the part of the licensees to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 19.12 and the guidance of RG 8.13, "Instructions Concerning Prenatal Radiation Exposure." It is not believed that the licensees were attempting to impede or hinder the inspection effort but rather were being overly cautious in their interpretation of the requirements.

RG 8.13 sets forth information to be presented by NRC licensees to female employees and to their supervisors and coworkers. This information is part of the instruction that should be provided pursuant to 10 CFR 19.12. The intent of RG 8.13 is not only to assure that employees are aware of the risk associated with radiation exposure of an embryo or fetus but also to permit women to make an informed decision when considering employment in situations involving their potential exposure to radiation. The dose limits in 10 CFR 20 do not differentiate between females and males. Licensees should not interpret the requirements of 10 CFR 19.12 and the guidance of RG 8.13 as imposing any additional radiation dose limits or restrictions on females.

Each female NRC inspector has to read and be familiar with RG 8.13. Therefore, licensees shall not restrict the access of an NRC inspector to any part of a facility because of requirements that are considered to be imposed by 10 CFR 19.12 as related to instructions of workers on the risks of prenatal radiation exposure.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 19.12, Regulatory Guide 8.13, Regulatory Guide 8.36

**Subject codes:** 8.11, 12.9, 12.18

**Applicability:** All

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, October 13, 2017
§ 132.11a Time of presentation. ( a ) *General rule.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the time of presentation of an entry/entry summary for quota purposes shall be the time of delivery in proper form of: ( 1 ) An entry summary for consumption, or its electronic equivalent, which serves as both the entry and the entry summary, with estimated duties attached; or
( 2 ) An entry summary for consumption, or its electronic equivalent, which shall serve as both the entry and the entry summary without estimated duties attached, if the entry/entry summary information and a valid scheduled statement date have been successfully received by Customs via the Automated Broker Interface (see § 132.1(d)(2); payment must be subsequently made by the statement processing method as set forth in § 24.25 of this chapter); or
( 3 ) A withdrawal for consumption with estimated duties attached.
( b ) *Before arrival of merchandise.* The entry summary for consumption, without estimated duties attached, may be submitted for preliminary review before the merchandise arrives within the limits of the port where entry is to be made. In that case, the time of presentation of the entry summary for consumption shall be the time estimated duties are deposited after the importing carrier arrives within the port limits.
( c ) *Failure to use statement processing method.* If presentation is chosen to be made pursuant to § 132.11a(a)(2) and payment is not made as required through the statement processing method, the Center director may require filing of an entry summary for consumption with estimated duties attached as described in § 132.11(a)(1) for future filings.
[T.D. 79-221, 44 FR 46814, Aug. 9, 1979, as amended by T.D. 89-104, 54 FR 50498, Dec. 7, 1989; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61287, Oct. 13, 2015; CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93017, Dec. 20, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93018, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 134.34 Certain repacked articles. ( a ) *Exception for repacked articles.* An exception under § 134.32(d) may be authorized in the discretion of the Center director for imported articles which are to be repacked after release from Customs custody under the following conditions: ( 1 ) The containers in which the articles are repacked will indicate the origin of the articles to an ultimate purchaser in the United States.
( 2 ) The importer arranges for supervision of the marking of the containers by Customs officers at the importer's expense or secures such verification, as may be necessary, by certification and the submission of a sample or otherwise, of the marking prior to the liquidation of the entry.
( b ) *Liquidation of entries.* The liquidation of such entries may be deferred for a period of not more than 60 days from the date that a request for repacking is granted. Extensions of the 60-day deferral period may be granted by the Center director in his discretion upon written application by the importer.
[T.D. 84-127, 49 FR 22795, June 1, 1984]
#### The Lafayette Trust Company, Plaintiff, *v.*James Beggs, Defendant.

*Banking*— *delinquent bank*— *Superintendent of Banks in possession*— *completing contract for sale bf land.*

Submission of controversy on agreed statement of facts, under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Per Curiam:

The parties concede that if it appeared that plaintiff was an insolvent bank, a judgment in its favor would be justified. *(Northern*
      *960
      *Bank of New York*v. Drury, 152 App. Div. 64.) The statement that since November 30, 1908, the Superintendent of Banks has been in possession of the property, business and assets of the plaintiff, and is now in possession of the same “for the purpose of liquidating its affairs, in accordance with section 19 of the Banking Law of the State of New York,” would justify an inference of insolvency. But in any event the reasoning of the *Drury*case is equally applicable to an insolvent and a delinquent corporation. Unless the deed tendered by the Superintendent of Banks in behalf of plaintiff would convey to defendant a good title, free from the lien of the judgments referred to in the submission of this controversy, it would be difficult to give full force and effect to that provision of the Banking Law authorizing him, upon obtaining an order of approval of the Supreme Court, to sell all the real property of such corporation on such terms as the court may direct. (Laws of 1892, chap. 689, § 18, as amd. by Laws of 1908, chap. 143; Laws of 1909, chap. 10, § 19, as amd. by Laws of 1910, chap. 452.)* There should be judgment for plaintiff directing that defendant perform his contract of purchase, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Judgment for plaintiff directing that defendant perform his contract of purchase, without costs.

See Gen. Laws, chap. 37; Consol Laws, chap. 2.—[Rep.
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.841 Applicability.

Title V of Public Law 109-432, entitled the Haitian Hemispheric Opportunity through Partnership Encouragement Act of 2006 (HOPE I Act), amended the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (the CBERA, 19 U.S.C. 2701-2707) by adding a new section 213A (19 U.S.C. 2703A) to authorize the President to extend additional trade benefits to Haiti. part I, Subtitle D, Title XV of Public Law 110-234, entitled the Haitian Hemispheric Opportunity through Partnership Encouragement Act of 2008 (HOPE II Act) amended certain provisions within section 213A. Section 213A of the CBERA provides for the duty-free treatment of certain apparel articles and certain wiring sets from Haiti. The provisions of this subpart set forth the legal requirements and procedures that apply for purposes of obtaining duty-free treatment pursuant to CBERA section 213A.

[CBP Dec. 08-24, 73 FR 56725, Sept. 30, 2008]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-167 October 23, 2000

ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE ON PLANT SYSTEMS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, ON OCTOBER 31

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)

has scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on plant systems on October 31 in Rockville, Maryland.

The subcommittee will discuss safety evaluation reports regarding digital and instrumentation and

control applications at nuclear power plants.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s

Two White Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, beginning at 8:30 a.m.

For additional information contact Amarjit Singh, at 301-415-6899. ACRS meeting notices,

transcripts and letters are available on the internet, at http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW/ .

###
### **CHAPTER 43—CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL

Sec.
4301.
Committee staffs.
4302.
Maximum annual rate of compensation of Chief of Staff of Joint Committee on Taxation.
4303.
Preparation and contents of statement of appropriations.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

4311.
Approval of employment and compensation of committee employees by House standing committees.
4312.
Regulations governing availability of appropriations for House committee employees.
4313.
Adjustment of House of Representatives allowances by Committee on House Oversight.
4314.
Limitation on allowance authority of Committee on House Oversight.
4315.
Overtime pay for FBI employees detailed to House Committee on Appropriations.
4316.
Allowances for compensation of interns in House committee offices.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—SENATE

4331.
Computation of compensation for stenographic assistance of committees payable from Senate contingent fund.
4332.
Assistance to Senators with committee memberships by employees in office of Senator.
4333.
Expenses of committees payable from Senate contingent fund.
4334.
Availability of funds for franked mail expenses.
4335.
Employment of civilian employees of executive branch of Government by Senate Committee on Appropriations; restoration to former position.
4336.
Discretionary authority of Senate Committee on Appropriations.
4337.
Transfer of funds by Chairman of Senate Committee on Appropriations.
4338.
Designation by Senator who is Chairman or Vice Chairman of Senate Select Committee on Ethics of employee in office of that Senator to perform part-time service for Committee; amount reimbursable; procedure applicable.