UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 2:20-CV-14216-ROSENBERG/MAYNARD

I-O-T-L, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

STARR SURPLUS LINES 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Defendant.

________________________/ 

ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE, 

CALENDAR CALL, AND TRIAL DATE, ORDER OF 

REQUIREMENTS, AND ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

This Court enters the following Order to apprise the parties of the trial date in this case and 

to establish certain pretrial procedures. Many of the procedures delineated in this Order are unique 

to the undersigned and, as a result, the parties should carefully review this Order. This Order does 

not contain pretrial deadlines. This Order sets forth all pretrial procedures. A second, separate 

order will establish all pretrial deadlines. It is the Court’s intention that this Order, together with 

the order setting pretrial deadlines, will provide the parties with all of the information they need to 

litigate before this Court. This Order is organized as follows: 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 1 of 19
Page 2 of 19 

1. TRIAL, CALENDAR CALL, AND STATUS CONFERENCE, page 3.

2. SERVICE, page 3. 

3. REFERRAL OF CERTAIN PRETRIAL MOTIONS, page 4.

4. PRETRIAL DEADLINES, page 4.

5. EXTENSIONS OF PRETRIAL DEADLINES, page 5. 

6. JURY TRIALS, page 6.

7. BENCH TRIALS, page 8.

8. EXHIBIT AND WITNESS LISTS, page 8.

9. TRIAL PLAN, STATUS CONFERENCE, AND PRETRIAL RULINGS, page 9.

10. HEARINGS, page 12.

11. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, page 12.

12. MOTIONS IN LIMINE, page 15.

13. MOTIONS TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, page 15.

14. DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND EXHIBIT OBJECTIONS, page 16.

15. PRETRIAL STIPULATION, page 18.

16. COMPUTERS AND OTHER EQUIPMENT, page 18.

17. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ORDER, page 19.

18. SETTLEMENT, page 19.

19. COMMUNICATIONS WITH CHAMBERS, page 19. 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 2 of 19
Page 3 of 19 

 The parties shall comply with the undersigned’s rules as follows:

1. TRIAL, CALENDAR CALL, AND STATUS CONFERENCE 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the above-captioned cause is hereby set for Trial before 

the Honorable Robin L. Rosenberg, United States District Judge, at the United States District Court 

at 101 South U.S. Highway 1, Fourth Floor, Courtroom 4008, Fort Pierce, Florida, during the 

four-week trial period commencing June 7, 2021, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the case 

may be called. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Calendar Call will be held on June 

2, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. and a Status Conference will be held on May 5, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel 

(or a pro se party) may appear at the Calendar Call or Status Conference via telephone but must 

file a notice of telephonic appearance at least one (1) day prior to the Status Conference or Calendar 

Call.1 The notice must include a certification that (1) counsel will not use a speakerphone to 

conduct the call and (2) counsel will conduct the call in a quiet environment without excessive 

background noise. Instructions for appearing via telephone are as follows: 

1. Please call five (5) minutes prior to the Status Conference or Calendar Call. 

2. The toll-free number is: 1 (877) 873-8018. 

3. The access code is: 9890482.

4. The security code is: 4008. 

Unless the parties are notified otherwise, the telephonic instructions listed above will apply to all 

telephonic appearances in this case. 

2. SERVICE 

Unless service is waived, proof of service must be made to the Court by filing the server’s 

affidavit immediately upon receipt. If a Defendant waives service, notice of the same shall be filed 

immediately. 

 

1

 Calendar Call and the pre-trial Status Conference will be held at the address and location specified above. In the 

event the Court’s schedule requires the parties to appear at another location, the Court will notify the parties by order. 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 3 of 19
Page 4 of 19 

3. REFERRAL OF CERTAIN PRETRIAL MOTIONS 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(A) and the Magistrate Judge Rules of the Local Rules 

of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned cause is referred to United States 

Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard for appropriate disposition of all pro hac vice motions, 

motions to substitute counsel, and pretrial motions related to discovery. 

The undersigned also refers to Judge Maynard the authority to permit an amendment to a 

pleading. If any party accepts the opportunity to amend a pleading from Judge Maynard, the 

undersigned will deem any pending motion to dismiss (or motion to strike) the pleading as moot. 

4. PRETRIAL DEADLINES 

Within two weeks of (1) the date upon which any one defendant appears in this action or 

(2) the rendition of this Order, whichever is later, the parties are directed to prepare and file a joint 

scheduling report (and e-mail a proposed order) as required by Local Rule 16.1. The joint 

scheduling report shall include all information required by Local Rule 16.1(b)(2) and (b)(3). The 

Court anticipates the following pretrial deadlines barring unusual circumstances: 

 Deadline to select a mediator and to schedule a time, date, and place for 

mediation within 30 days of the scheduling order. 

 Deadline to amend pleadings and join parties within 60 days of the 

scheduling order. 

 Completion of all discovery 120 days prior to trial. 

 Deadline for dispositive pretrial motions and Daubert motions (which 

include motions to strike experts) 90 days prior to trial. 

 Completion of mediation 60 days prior to trial. 

The parties should address their joint scheduling report and their proposed pretrial 

deadlines to the Court’s anticipated deadlines outlined above. The parties are encouraged to 

explain their proposed deadlines to the extent such deadlines conflict with the Court’s anticipated 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 4 of 19
Page 5 of 19 

deadlines outlined above. In the event the parties determine that the Court’s trial date should either 

be extended or shortened based upon the expedited, standard, or complex case management tracks 

described in Local Rule 16.1(a), the parties should explain the basis for so concluding, together 

with any affidavits in support of a continuance that may be necessary under Local Rule 7.6. 

Finally, the parties’ proposed order should be a Microsoft Word document utilizing the format in 

the Court’s sample scheduling order on the undersigned’s webpage at: 

http://www.flsd.uscourts.gov / content / judge-robin-l-rosenberg. In the event the parties do not 

file a joint scheduling report by the deadline established by this Order, the Court will unilaterally 

determine the pretrial deadlines in this case, however, the Court’s determination will not relieve 

the parties from their obligation to conduct a Rule 26(f) conference. 

5. EXTENSIONS OF PRETRIAL DEADLINES 

Provided that all parties are in agreement, any pretrial deadline(s) prior to the deadline for 

the filing of dispositive motions may be modified without Court order by filing a joint notice 

indicating the new pretrial deadline(s) reached by agreement. A motion need not be filed. 

However, if the parties elect to modify deadlines2 by agreement, the parties should not anticipate 

that the Court will modify other deadlines as a result of any possible prejudice to the parties. By 

way of example, if the parties extend the deadline for discovery, the parties should not anticipate 

that the Court will modify the deadline for dispositive motions. Furthermore, the parties are hereby 

on notice that if the parties extend the deadline for discovery, the Court will deem the parties to 

have waived any argument under Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that a party 

cannot move for or defend against summary judgment because of the extension of the discovery 

deadline. Only when the parties seek and are unable to agree on a modification of a pretrial 

 

2

 The parties’ modification of the deadline for discovery will not extend the time for any party to file a motion to 

compel. The deadline for discovery motion practice will be governed by the discovery deadline entered by the Court. 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 5 of 19
Page 6 of 19 

deadline or seek an extension of the deadline for dispositive motions or any deadline following the 

deadline for dispositive motions, should the parties file a motion with the Court. The parties may 

not utilize this procedure to extend the deadline to answer a pleading or to respond to a motion. If 

any party fails to follow the procedures in this order, the Court may deny the motion without 

prejudice. 

The parties are cautioned that the Court will not grant continuances of the dispositive 

motion deadline or trial date lightly. Any motion requesting either of these forms of relief should 

contain detailed information in support of the motion, including the amount, timing, and type of 

discovery that was undertaken in the case. The Court’s strong adherence to the dispositive deadline 

is for the parties’ benefit. Because of the amount of time necessary for a dispositive motion to 

ripen and because of the significant amount of time the Court needs in order to properly evaluate 

and consider dispositive motions, the dispositive deadline must be set several months before trial. 

In the event the dispositive deadline is extended, an order granting dispositive relief may come too 

late to save the parties from unnecessary pretrial preparation costs and expenses. Finally, in the 

event the Court declines to extend any deadline, the parties have the option of consenting to 

magistrate judge jurisdiction which affords the parties greater flexibility with pretrial deadlines 

and a trial date.

6. JURY TRIALS 

In addition to filing their proposed jury instructions and verdict form with the Clerk (the 

date for filing the proposed jury instructions is set forth in the pretrial scheduling order), the parties 

shall also submit A SINGLE JOINT SET of proposed jury instructions and verdict form in Word 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 6 of 19
Page 7 of 19 

format directly to Rosenberg@flsd.uscourts.gov.3 To the extent these instructions are based 

upon the Eleventh Circuit pattern jury instructions, counsel shall indicate the appropriate 

Eleventh Circuit pattern jury instruction upon which their instruction is modeled. All other 

instructions shall include citations to relevant supporting case law. 

The Court wishes to impress upon the parties how important it is for the parties to devote 

serious consideration to their proposed jury instructions. The Court’s review of proposed jury 

instructions is both time and labor intensive. When a party alters a legal position on a jury 

instruction at trial (as compared to the party’s original position in the proposed instructions), much 

of the Court’s pre-trial preparation is wasted. Relatedly, when a party raises an argument for the 

first time at trial on jury instructions, the ability of both the Court and the parties to research the 

new position is hampered by the time constraints of a trial day and the need to respect the time 

commitment of the jury. Thus, the parties should confer and reach an agreement on as many jury 

instructions as possible because, through such an agreement, both the parties and the Court can 

focus their respective valuable time on the central issues in dispute that cannot be resolved 

through reasonable conferral. 

The parties need not agree on the proposed language of each instruction or question on the 

verdict form. Where the parties do agree on a proposed instruction or question, that instruction or 

question shall be set forth in Times New Roman 14 point typeface. Instructions and questions 

proposed only by the plaintiff(s) to which the defendant(s) object shall be italicized. Instructions 

and questions proposed only by defendant(s) to which plaintiff(s) object shall be bold-faced. If a 

party’s objection to an instruction is that the obstruction should not be given, the objecting party 

 

3

 The joint set of proposed jury instructions should include both preliminary jury instructions (from the appropriate 

Eleventh Circuit pattern instructions) as well as final jury instructions. Proposed voir dire questions and verdict forms 

should be e-mailed in Word format to this e-mail address as well. 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 7 of 19
Page 8 of 19 

must still either (i) submit proposed wording for the instruction or (ii) state that there is no 

objection to the wording of the instruction, subject to the party’s preserved objection. Each jury 

instruction shall be typed on a separate page and, except for Eleventh Circuit pattern instructions 

clearly identified as such, must be supported by citations to authority. In preparing the requested 

jury instructions, the parties shall use as a guide the pattern jury instructions for civil cases 

approved by the Eleventh Circuit, including the directions to counsel contained therein. 

If a Defendant does not intend to pursue an affirmative defense at trial, or if a pled 

affirmative defense is not a valid affirmative defense under the law, the Defendant should not 

propose an instruction on that defense and should instead inform the Court of the same. Defenses 

such as “failure to state a claim” and “failure to prove the elements of a cause of action” are not 

affirmative defenses. 

When the parties file proposed jury instructions, the parties shall also file a joint statement 

of the case. The statement of the case should be brief and should contain no argument. The 

purpose of the joint statement of the case is merely to convey enough information to a prospective 

juror for that juror to ascertain whether he or she has previous knowledge of the case. 

7. BENCH TRIALS 

An additional copy of all proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (the date 

for filing the proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law is set forth in the pretrial 

scheduling order) shall be sent in Word format to the chambers e-mail account listed above. 

Proposed Conclusions of Law must be supported by citations to authority. 

8. EXHIBIT AND WITNESS LISTS 

In any proceeding where evidence will be introduced, counsel shall submit to the Court a typed list 

of proposed witnesses and/or exhibits. The date for filing the proposed witnesses and/or exhibit 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 8 of 19
Page 9 of 19 

lists for trial is one week prior to Calendar Call. All exhibits shall be pre-labeled in accordance 

with the proposed exhibit list, and only numerical sequences are permitted—alphabetical 

designations shall not be used. Exhibit labels must include the case number, the exhibit number, 

and the party offering the exhibit. A typewritten exhibit list setting forth the number, or letter, and 

description of each exhibit must be submitted prior to trial. Any composite exhibits should be 

listed separately, i.e. 1A, 1B, 1C, etc. The parties shall submit said exhibit list on AO Form 187, 

which is available from the Clerk’s office and at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. 

At trial, the parties shall deliver to the Court a USB flash drive that contains digital copies of the 

exhibits. The parties must also comply with Local Rule 5.3. 

9. TRIAL PLAN, STATUS CONFERENCE, AND PRETRIAL RULINGS 

At the Status Conference, the Court will require all parties to estimate the total number of 

witnesses each party intends to call at trial and to estimate the total amount of time requested for 

trial. The Court will utilize this estimate in the event multiple cases proceed to trial during the 

relevant trial period. The parties’ estimate is not intended to be binding on the parties—it is merely 

a preliminary scheduling tool for the Court. 

As Calendar Call draws near, the Court will require a more detailed estimate of the time 

needed for trial. The parties shall file a joint trial plan one week prior to Calendar Call. The joint 

trial plan shall set forth the following information: (1) the anticipated length of time required for 

each party’s opening statement; (2) the witnesses each party intends to call at trial, listed in the 

order in which these witnesses will be called;4

 (3) a brief description of each witness (e.g., the 

identity of the witness and the relationship of the witness to any parties in the case); (4) whether 

 

4

 If adjustments become necessary during trial, the Court will not require the parties to call their witnesses in the order 

in which they are listed in the joint trial plan, as long as sufficient advance notice of the adjustments is provided to the 

Court and opposing counsel. However, the Court expects very little deviation from the joint trial plan in all other 

respects. 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 9 of 19
Page 10 of 19 

the witness is an expert and, if so, the area of expertise of the witness; (5) whether each witness 

will testify live, by video deposition, or by reading of deposition testimony; (6) the anticipated 

length of time required for direct examination, cross examination, and redirect examination of each 

witness; (7) the anticipated length of time required for each party’s closing argument; (8) any 

additional matters that may affect the course of trial; and (9) an accurate summation of the 

total time allocated in the trial plan.

5

 

The Court prefers the trial plan to be submitted using the following format: 

 Prior to filing the joint trial plan, the parties shall meet and confer regarding the matters 

outlined therein. The parties shall certify in the joint trial plan that they have complied with this 

requirement. No witness should appear on the trial plan who was not disclosed in the Pretrial 

Stipulation. 

 At the same time that the parties file their joint trial plan, the parties shall also file a Notice 

of Remaining Issues that Require Adjudication. This Notice shall inform the Court of areas in 

which a ruling is required including: (1) jury instructions, (2) verdict forms, (3) exhibits, (4) 

 

5

 The parties need not include an estimation of time for jury selection. 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 10 of 19
Page 11 of 19 

deposition designations, and (5) other evidentiary objections. The parties shall inform the Court 

of the general category or nature of the disputes and provide a brief summary of the factual and/or 

legal support for the parties’ respective positions. At Calendar Call, the Court will discuss the 

volume of remaining issues with the parties. In the event the number of remaining issues is small, 

the Court will endeavor to handle these matters at Calendar Call. In the event the number of 

remaining issues is moderate or large, the Court will endeavor to set time before trial commences 

for argument and rulings on as many of the remaining issues as possible. In the event the Court is 

unable to address all issues prior to trial, the Court may utilize the first day of trial, either before 

or after jury selection, to render pre-trial rulings. The Court’s objective in utilizing this procedure 

is two-fold. First, the Court seeks to utilize the jury’s service as efficiently as possible with 

minimal, if any, evidentiary objections at trial. Second, the Court seeks to finalize the jury 

instructions and verdict form early because, in the Court’s experience, counsel’s time during trial 

is best spent on the trial itself without distraction on the legal issues and argument that commonly 

arise in the finalization of jury instructions. Of course, the Court recognizes that the finalization 

of jury instructions cannot be accomplished until all of the evidence has been presented. 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 11 of 19
Page 12 of 19 

10. HEARINGS 

The Court will review sua sponte any motions (other than those referred to the Magistrate 

Judge) and determine which motions are appropriate for a hearing. Counsel is allowed to appear 

in person or via telephone, unless the Court instructs otherwise. In order to appear via telephone, 

counsel must file a notice of telephonic appearance, as set forth in the instructions in this Order, at 

least one (1) day prior to the hearing. The Court will endeavor to give the parties as much notice 

of the scheduled hearing as possible, but, at times, notice may be within a week of the hearing. 

The Court’s sua sponte setting of hearings on motions does not preclude the parties from 

requesting oral argument, as appropriate, on filed motions. Finally, counsel should keep in mind 

the need to provide courtroom experience to the next generation of practitioners and, as a result, 

the Court will particularly welcome any lawyer with four or fewer years of experience to argue 

any of the motions set for a hearing. 

11. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND STATEMENTS OF 

MATERIAL FACTS 

Local Rule 56.1(a) requires a motion for summary judgment (and opposition thereto) to be 

accompanied by a statement of material facts. Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(a)(2), this statement of 

material facts must be supported by specific references to pleadings, depositions, answers to 

interrogatories, admissions, and affidavits on file with the court. In the event a respondent fails to 

controvert a movant’s supported material facts in an opposing statement of material facts, the 

movant’s material facts will be deemed admitted. Local Rule 56.1(b). In the interest of judicial 

economy, in the interest of proper and careful consideration of each party’s statement of material 

facts, and in the interest of determining matters on summary judgment on the merits, the Court 

hereby orders the parties to file any statement of material facts as follows: 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 12 of 19
Page 13 of 19 

A statement of material facts shall be a separate filing from a motion for summary judgment 

or a response to a motion for summary judgment. 

Each material fact in the statement that requires evidentiary support shall be supported by 

a specific citation. This specific citation shall reference pages (and line numbers, if necessary) of 

exhibits. When a material fact requires evidentiary support, a general citation to an exhibit, 

without a page number or pincite, is not permitted. 

Each cited exhibit must be an attachment to the statement of material facts. By way of 

example, a statement of material facts may be filed in CM/ECF6 with attachments as follows: 

All citations in the statement of material facts must cite to the attached exhibits. For 

example, a citation could be to “Exhibit A, ¶ 2” or (for a deposition) “Exhibit C, p. 12 line 15” or 

 

6

 The Court recognizes that pro se parties do not have control over how their filings appear in CM/ECF. Nonetheless, 

a pro se litigant’s paper filing must comply with the requirements of this Order. 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 13 of 19
Page 14 of 19 

“Exhibit C, 12:15”.7 Hypothetical unacceptable citations include the following: “Exhibit B” or 

“Smith Affidavit”. Similarly, a party should not cite to “Smith Affidavit, pgs. 223-24” and should 

instead cite to “Exhibit E, Smith Affidavit, pgs. 223-24”. 

A respondent’s statement of material facts must specifically respond to each statement in 

the movant’s statement of material facts. By way of example, if a movant’s statement of material 

facts reads as follows: 

MOVANT’S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS 

1. Blackacre is owned by Movant. Exhibit B, ¶ 2. 

2. Blackacre is currently under contract for sale. Exhibit C, pgs. 2-4. 

A respondent’s statement of material facts must clearly respond to each of the foregoing: 

RESPONDENT’S STATEMENT OF DISPUTED FACTS 

IN OPPOSITION TO MOVANT’S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL 

FACTS AND STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FACTS 

IN OPPOSITION TO MOVANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Paragraph 1: Undisputed 

Paragraph 2: Disputed. The contract for sale was never executed. Exhibit A, ¶ 5. 

As shown above, the first word in each response must be “disputed” or “undisputed.” If a 

statement is disputed, the evidentiary citations supporting that dispute must be limited to evidence 

specific to the dispute. Additional facts that do not directly refute the disputed fact should be 

included in the respondent’s own statement of (additional) material facts. 

 

7

 The citations in this section are not intended to correspond directly to the example image of a filing in CM/ECF. 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 14 of 19
Page 15 of 19 

 In the event a party fails to comply with the requirements delineated in this section, the 

Court may strike the deficient statement of material facts and require immediate compliance, grant 

an opposing party relief, or enter any other sanction that the Court deems appropriate. 

12. MOTIONS IN LIMINE 

Each party is limited to filing one motion in limine that contains no more than three requests 

for relief. This limitation includes Daubert challenges to expert witnesses. Any party may move 

for a modification of this limitation at least one week in advance of the deadline for filing motions 

in limine and must provide a detailed basis to support the requested relief. Motions in limine that 

request for the Court to order the opposing party to comply with the Federal Rules of Evidence are 

improper and may be denied immediately. 

13. MOTIONS TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

Motions to strike are generally disfavored as courts consider them “a drastic remedy to be 

resorted to only when required for the purposes of justice” that should only be granted when 

allegations “have no possible relation to the controversy.” Augustus v. Bd. of Pub. Instruction, 

306 F.2d 862, 868 (5th Cir. 1962). This Court disfavors motions to strike affirmative defenses. 

However, the Court will not permit a defendant to raise an affirmative defense that is not, in fact, 

an affirmative defense (such as the affirmative defense of “failure to state a claim”) at any stage 

of the litigation, including upon the filing of a motion for summary judgment and at trial. When 

counsel files such affirmative defenses, it reflects a lack of due diligence in the crafting of the 

answer and the affirmative defenses. The Court will construe improper affirmative defenses as 

denials. See Ramnarine v. CP RE Holdco 2009-1, LLC, No. 12-61716, 2013 WL 1788503, at *4 

(S.D. Fla. Apr. 26, 2013) (“The proper remedy when a party mistakenly labels a denial as an 

affirmative defense is not to strike the claim but instead to treat it as a specific denial.”). 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 15 of 19
Page 16 of 19 

Nonetheless, the Court does not prohibit any party from filing a motion to strike affirmative 

defenses. In the event a party elects to file a motion to strike affirmative defenses, however, the 

party must certify in the opening paragraph of the motion that the party has read and considered 

this section in the Court’s Order and has considered the case law cited herein. 

14. DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBITS 

In the experience of this Court, only a small fraction of deposition designations are utilized 

at trial. Juxtaposed to the small amount of deposition designation testimony utilized at trial is the 

large amount of time and expense that deposition designations entail: the proponent must study a 

deposition to designate relevant testimony, the opposing party must prepare objections to 

designated testimony, the proponent must thereafter respond to the opposing party’s objections, 

the parties must confer on all objections, the Court must hear argument on unresolved, contested 

objections, and the Court must, in many cases, review extensive portions of deposition transcripts. 

The Court’s review of deposition transcripts is complicated by the fact that the Court is often 

without the benefit—unlike the parties—of the context of the entire scope of evidence that will be 

introduced at trial. The foregoing impacts the amount of time the parties have to prepare for the 

trial and the amount of time that jurors may spend hearing evidence on a given trial day. In 

summary, the foregoing affects the Court’s and the parties’ obligations under Rule 1 of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 1 requires that the Federal Rules be “construed, administered, and 

employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of 

every action and proceeding.” In accordance with its obligations under Rule 1, the Court orders 

the following. 

First, the parties are ordered to provide the Court with a deposition designation notebook. 

This notebook must be delivered to Chambers one week prior to Calendar Call. Second, the 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 16 of 19
Page 17 of 19 

notebook (or notebooks) must contain the full deposition transcript for each designated witness. 

Third, the designated (or counter-designated) testimony for each witness must be highlighted and 

easy to locate and identify. Fourth, objections to the designated testimony must be supplemented 

with an appendix that contains detailed legal argument explaining the objections, together with a 

response from the opposing party. Fifth and finally, an objection to designated testimony may 

only be raised after a full, reasonable conferral between the parties on the issue in dispute as more 

fully set forth below. 

Deposition designation objections must be accompanied by a certification, by the party 

objecting, that: (i) the parties have conferred on the objection, (ii) the objection is raised in good 

faith, (iii) the objection raises an issue that the parties, working together as professionals, cannot 

resolve without court intervention, and (iv) the expenditure of judicial labor is the only avenue by 

which the dispute may be resolved. The Court will carefully consider all of the objections brought 

to its attention. In the event the Court concludes that a designating party or counsel, or an objecting 

party or counsel, has failed “to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every 

action and proceeding,” the Court may consider sanctions, as appropriate. Similarly, if the Court 

concludes that objections to designations must be ruled upon contemporaneously with the reading 

of designated testimony8

 at trial because of a party or counsel’s failure to comply with this Order, 

the Court may consider sanctions, as appropriate. 

Finally, the requirements in the preceding paragraph apply to the parties’ objections to 

exhibits. The parties are expected to fully and reasonably confer on every objection to an exhibit. 

In the event the Court determines that objections to exhibits are objections that could have been 

 

8

 Such a ruling may mean that a transcript of a video deposition must be read in lieu of presentation of the video 

recording. 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 17 of 19
Page 18 of 19 

resolved through a full, reasonable, and professional conferral, the Court may consider sanctions, 

as appropriate. 

15. PRETRIAL STIPULATION 

The Joint Pretrial Stipulation shall conform to S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1(e). The Court will not 

accept unilateral pretrial stipulations, and will strike sua sponte any such submissions. Should any 

of the parties fail to cooperate in preparing the Joint Pretrial Stipulation, all parties shall file (by 

the date the pretrial stipulation was due) a certification with the Court stating the circumstances. 

Upon receipt of such certifications, the Court may issue an order requiring the non-cooperating 

party or parties to show cause why such party or parties, or their respective attorneys, should not 

be sanctioned for the failure to comply with the Court’s order. The pretrial disclosures and 

objections required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) should be served, but not filed with the Clerk’s 

Office, as the same information is required to be attached to the parties’ Joint Pretrial Stipulation. 

The filing of a motion to continue trial shall not stay the requirement for the filing of a Pretrial 

Stipulation. 

The Pretrial Stipulation must contain a list of the exhibits each side intends to offer at trial 

and a list of each witness who will testify at trial. If an exhibit does not appear on the exhibit list, 

that exhibit may not be offered at trial absent good cause and no prejudice to the other side. If a 

witness does not appear on the witness list, that witness may not testify at trial absent good cause 

and no prejudice to the other side. 

16. COMPUTERS AND OTHER EQUIPMENT

Counsel desiring to utilize laptop computers or other electronic equipment in the courtroom 

shall file a motion and submit a proposed order granting such use one week prior to the 

commencement of trial. The motion and proposed order should describe with specificity (1) the 

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 18 of 19
Page 19 of 19 

equipment, (2) the make and model of the equipment, and (3) the identity of the person who will 

bring the proposed equipment. A sample order permitting electronic equipment into the courtroom 

is available for viewing on the Court’s website at: http://www.flsd.uscourts.gov / content / judgerobin-l-rosenberg. Counsel shall contact the courtroom deputy at least one week prior to trial to 

discuss any special equipment (video monitor, etc.) that may require special arrangements. 

17. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ORDER 

Intentional or repeated non-compliance with any provision of this Order may subject the 

non-complying party or counsel to appropriate sanctions. It is the duty of all counsel to enforce 

the timetable set forth herein in order to ensure an expeditious resolution of this cause. 

18. SETTLEMENT 

If the case is settled, counsel shall so inform the Court within two court-days of settlement 

by submitting an appropriate notice of settlement, stipulation for dismissal, or motion for 

dismissal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). See Local Rule 16.4. The parties 

shall attend all hearings and abide by all time requirements unless and until an order of dismissal 

is filed. 

19. COMMUNICATION WITH CHAMBERS 

Rules regarding communication with Chambers are available for viewing at 

http://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/content/judge-robin-l-rosenberg. 

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, West Palm Beach, Florida, this 13th day of July, 

2020. 

 _______________________________ 

Copies furnished to: ROBIN L. ROSENBERG 

Counsel of record UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:20-cv-14216-RLR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 19 of 19