alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

ALRAY SUMPTER, SR., 

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, 

Respondent.

__________________________ 

2013-3062

__________________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in case no. AT0752120711-I-1.

__________________________ 

ON MOTION

__________________________ 

O R D E R

The Department of the Treasury moves to recaption to 

name the Merit Systems Protection Board as respondent, 

and for a 21-day extension of time for the Board to file its 

response brief. 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The 

employing agency is designated as the respondent when 

Case: 13-3062 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 03/21/2013
ALRAY SUMPTER, SR. V. MSPB 2

the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, 

the Board dismissed Sumpter’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this 

petition for review.

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motions are granted. The revised official caption 

is reflected above. The Board should calculate its brief 

due date from the date of filing of this order.

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly

 Clerk

s21 

Case: 13-3062 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 03/21/2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                 837,290
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0              12,443,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0              (1,342,462)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0              14,263,080
<PP&E>                                               0              38,663,314
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0             (14,479,178)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0              67,842,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0              40,235,634
<BONDS>                                              0              11,675,036
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0               5,414,923
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                  11,716
<OTHER-SE>                                           0               7,752,024
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0              67,842,369
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,042,574              22,044,252
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,274,595              21,859,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (27,441)                (18,212)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                48,054                 102,566
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,048,552               2,059,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,356,068)             (1,996,034)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   126,506                 (91,082)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,482,574)             (1,904,952)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,482,574)             (1,904,952)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.13)                  (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.12)                  (0.15)


</TABLE>
### §179q. Seal of National Film Registry

#### (a) Use of seal

#### (1) Prohibition on distribution and exhibition

No person shall knowingly distribute or exhibit to the public a version of a film or any copy in any format of a film which bears the seal described in section 179m(a)(3) of this title if such film—

(A) is not included in the National Film Registry; or

(B) is included in the National Film Registry, but such film or film copy has not been approved for use of the seal by the Librarian pursuant to section 179m(a)(1)(D) of this title.

#### (2) Prohibition on promotion

No person shall knowingly use the seal described in section 179m(a)(3) of this title to promote any version of a film in any format other than a Registry version.

#### (b) Effective date of seal

The use of the seal described in section 179m(a)(3) of this title shall be effective for each film after the Librarian publishes in the Federal Register, in accordance with section 179m(a)(2) of this title, the name of that film as selected for inclusion in the National Film Registry.

(Pub. L. 104–285, title I, §107, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3381; Pub. L. 109–9, title III, §302(d), Apr. 27, 2005, 119 Stat. 225.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 109–9, §302(d)(1), inserted "in any format" after "or any copy" in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 109–9, §302(d)(2), substituted "in any format" for "or film copy".
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFingerprinting of MaterialsRecent issues emerging in our fiscal and ecological environments have promulgated that federal agencies shall promote activities which respond to the improvement of both. In response to these developments, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has undertaken an innovative approach to improve the control of materials used in all NASA manufacturing activities. In concert with this goal, NASA is requiring that its contractors and their sub-contractors perform a more intensive consolidation of technologies that can provide an accounting of materials, which includes in-coming materials, materials in process, end-products and waste materials. The purpose of this handbook is to provide guidelines to NASA and its contractor personnel for the planning and implementation of chemical fingerprinting programs and to illustrate the chemical and statistical fundamentals needed for successful use of chemical fingerprinting.Document ID19930006727Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsWorkman, Gary L*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 30, 1992Subject CategoryEnvironment PollutionReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-184482NAS 1.26:184482Accession Number93N15916Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-38609Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930006727.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle19930006728WorkFingerprinting of Materials: Technical Supplementvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.860 Required objectives.

A Project must achieve at least one of the economic development objectives set forth in § 120.861 or § 120.862.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-61229-RAR

JOEL ALIDES RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

SONIA QUINONES, in her official capacity 

as Chief of the Hallandale Police Department, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/ 

ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT

AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES1

The parties are directed to prepare and file a joint scheduling report, as required by Local 

Rule 16.1, by November 16, 2020. In addition, by November 16, 2020, the parties, including 

governmental parties, must file Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure 

Statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or 

corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, 

conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. 

Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, 

correct, and update the Certificates.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida this 14th day of September, 2020.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

 The parties must not include Judge Ruiz as an interested party unless he has an interest in the litigation.

Case 0:20-cv-61229-RAR Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2020 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2004N-0049]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

      ( print page 60885)    

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Control of Communicable Diseases; Restrictions on African Rodents, Prairie Dogs, and Certain Other Animals” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

JonnaLynn P. Capezzuto, Office of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of July 9, 2004 (69 FR 41501), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0519.  The approval expires on September 30, 2007.   A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets*.                

Dated: October 5, 2004.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-22899 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-26 June 22, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC TO DISCUSS

NEW REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS FOR DIABLO CANYON

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting Thursday, June 29, in San

Luis Obispo, Calif., to discuss the new reactor oversight process for Diablo Canyon, a nuclear power

plant operated by Pacific Gas & Electric.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. at the Embassy Suites Hotel, 333 Madonna Rd., San Luis

Obispo. Anyone who would like to learn more about the new oversight process or ask questions of

NRC officials is invited to attend.

The new program was implemented nationwide in early April after a six-month pilot test

conducted at 13 nuclear power plants at nine sites from May to November 1999. It uses more

objective, timely, and safety-significant criteria in assessing performance, while seeking to more

effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. It also takes into account improvements in the

performance of the nuclear industry over the past twenty years.

Under the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based

personnel are supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators.

These performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant performance, including the

viability of redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection, and security.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s internet website every three months, along with semi-annual updates to each plant's inspection

plans. Current performance information for River Bend can be found at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/DIAB1/diab1_chart.html

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/DIAB2/diab2_chart.html

A plain language summary of the new inspection and assessment program is available from the

NRC Office of Public Affairs or on the website at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

##
#### § 63.1 Purpose of part.

The purpose of this part is to implement section 1306(c) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended (the Act). Section 544 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1987 (Pub. L. 100-242) amended the Act by adding subsection (c) to section 1306 of the Act. Under this amendment, effective February 5, 1988, section 1306(c) of the Act provides for benefit payments under the Standard Flood Insurance Policy (SFIP) for demolition or relocation of a structure insured under the Act that is located along the shore of a lake or other body of water and that is certified by an appropriate State or local land use authority to be subject to imminent collapse or subsidence as a result of erosion or undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding anticipated cyclical levels. This part establishes criteria by which States can obtain the approval of the Federal Insurance Administrator to make these certifications and sets forth the procedures and data requirements to be used by those States in making these certifications. This part also contains provisions regarding other aspects of section 1306(c) of the Act. For example, there are provisions regarding section 1306(c)(6)(B) of the Act (which provides for condemnation in lieu of certification), including clarification as to the form of condemnation issued under a State or local law that is required.
EXHIBIT 32

Securities
and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eastern American Natural Gas Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., Trustee, Trustee for Eastern American Natural Gas TrustBy:

/s/ MIKE ULRICH Vice President
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.Date: November 9, 2009


---



QuickLinks
#### Smith G. Willcox v. The Erie Railroad Company.

Motion granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      OF THE


PRINCIPAL
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Peter
      J. Bergmann, the Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer of YP Corp.,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of YP Corp. on Form
      10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of YP Corp.





Date:
                November 30, 2005
            */s/ Peter J.
              Bergmann*Peter J. BergmannChief Executive Officer





I,
      W.
      Chris Broquist, the Chief Financial Officer of YP Corp., certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of YP Corp. on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal
      year ended September 30, 2001 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of YP
      Corp.




Date:
                  November 30, 2005
              */s/ W. Chris
                Broquist*W. Chris BroquistChief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.510 Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon importation. ( a ) *Claim.* An importer may make a claim for SFTA preferential tariff treatment, including an exemption from the merchandise processing fee, based on the importer's knowledge or information in the importer's possession that the good qualifies as an originating good. For goods that qualify as originating goods under the Integrated Sourcing Initiative (*see* subdivisions (b)(ii) and (m) of General Note 25, HTSUS, and § 10.532 of this subpart), the claim is made by including on the entry summary, or equivalent documentation, the tariff item 9999.00.84, HTSUS, or by the method specified for equivalent reporting via an authorized electronic data interchange system. For all other qualifying goods, the claim is made by including on the entry summary, or equivalent documentation, the letters “SG” as a prefix to the subheading of the HTSUS under which each qualifying good is classified, or by the method specified for equivalent reporting via an authorized electronic data interchange system.
( b ) *Corrected claim.* If, after making the claim required under paragraph (a) of this section, the importer becomes aware that the claim is invalid, the importer must promptly correct the claim and pay any duties that may be due. The importer must submit a statement either in writing or via an authorized electronic data interchange system to the CBP office where the original claim was filed specifying the correction (*see* §§ 10.561 and 10.562 of this subpart).
Exhibit 99.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

The undersigned, the trustee (the "Trustee") in respect of the Trust
Certificates (TRUCs) Series 2001-3, hereby certifies to Bear Stearns Depositor
Inc. as follows:

1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 8-K
filed by U.S. Bank Trust National Association, solely as Trustee for the Trust
Certificates (TRUCs) Series 2001-3 Trust and any distribution reports filed in
respect of the Trust during the 2003 calendar year;

2. The information in those reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, no misleading as of the last day of the period covered by
the annual report;

3. The distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the
depositor by the Trustee under the trust agreement for inclusion in these
reports is included in such reports; and

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee under
the trust agreement and except as disclosed in these reports, the Trustee has
fulfilled its obligations under the trust agreement.

                                  U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL
                                  ASSOCIATION



                                  By: /s/ Beverly A. Freeney For Adam K. Berman
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Title:  Assistant Vice President
                                      Date:   March  24, 2004


                                       7
#### Curtis Lee COOLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Denise NAU, Laramie County Judge, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-8006.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

May 21, 2002.

*792ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Pro se plaintiff Curtis Cooley appeals the dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit against Laramie County Judge Denise Nau. Mr. Cooley alleged that Judge Nau mistakenly found that he had violated the conditions of his probation, and wrongfully confined him to a mental institution. Mr. Cooley sought $43 million in damages. The district court dismissed the complaint as barred by absolute judicial immunity. This appeal followed.

Judges are entitled to absolute immunity from civil liability for judicial acts, “unless committed in the clear absence of all jurisdiction.” *Whitesel v. Sengenberger,*222 F.3d 861, 867 (10th Cir.2000). A judge does not act in the clear absence of all jurisdiction even if she acted in error, maliciously, or in excess of her authority. *Id.*Having reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that Judge Nau did not act in the clear absence of all jurisdiction. We therefore AFFIRM the ruling of the district court.

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.