alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-188 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Tuesday, December 24,

1996)

NOTE TO EDITORS -- ACRS MEETING

Two subcommittees of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) will hold a joint

technical meeting January 9, in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will begin at 1:00

p.m. in Room 2B1 of the NRC's Two White Flint North Building at

11545 Rockville Pike. The subcommittees on Material and

Metallurgy and Severe Accidents will hold discussions with NRC

staff regarding the November 20 ACRS letter to the NRC Executive

Director for Operations on the proposed steam generator integrity

rule and an associated regulatory guide, as well as related

matters.

Other aspects of the meeting, including the opportunity for

public comment, are described in a Notice of Meeting to be

published in the December 26 edition of the Federal Register.

####
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.3 Pilot programs.

The Administrator of SBA may from time to time suspend, modify, or waive rules for a limited period of time to test new programs or ideas. The Administrator shall publish a document in the Federal Register explaining the reasons for these actions.
### §2. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 8, 1911, ch. 5, §§1, 2, 37 Stat. 13, 14, fixed composition of House of Representatives at 435 Members, to be apportioned to the States therein enumerated. For provisions dealing with reapportionment of Representatives and manner of election, etc., see sections 2a and 2b of this title.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-98-55 November 25, 1998

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION TO MEET NOV. 30 IN MARYLAND

ON STATUS OF COOK NUCLEAR PLANT REPAIRS AND IMPROVEMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet November 30 with

representatives of American Electric Power Company to discuss the status of repair

and improvement activities at the D. C. Cook Nuclear Power Station. The two-reactor

plant is located near Bridgman, Michigan.

The Commission meeting will be at 2 p.m. EST (1 p.m. CST) at the NRC

Headquarters, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

News media representatives may also view the meeting by video conference at

the NRC’s Region III Office, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois.

American Electric Power shut down both D. C. Cook units in September of last

year after an NRC design inspection raised

questions about how past plant modifications had been controlled and reviewed.

Additional problems were also found in the utility’s inspection and maintenance

of an important safety system, the ice

condenser system, and with the control of debris and other foreign material in the

reactor containment that might affect plant safety systems. (The ice condenser system

is designed to prevent excessive pressure that might damage the reactor containment

during a possible accident.)

The units have remained shut down while the utility performed extensive reviews

and modifications of the plant. Inspections and repairs of the ice condensers are still

under way.

The plant will not resume operation until deficiencies are corrected. Further NRC

inspections will be conducted to assure

that problems are corrected and that the facility is ready for restart.

#####
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-77 August 18, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC INSPECTION TEAM TO PRESENT PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

ON CIRCUIT BREAKER FAILURE AT CLINTON NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet Wednesday,

August 20, with representatives of Illinois Power Company to

discuss the preliminary findings of the NRC Augmented Inspection

Team's review of a circuit breaker failure at the Clinton Nuclear

Power Plant.

The meeting will be at 10 a.m. in the Energy and

Environmental Center at the Clinton plant on Illinois Route 54,

east of Clinton, Illinois. It will be open to public

observation.

The circuit breaker failure occurred on August 5 as the

utility was changing from one pump to another in the plant's

shutdown cooling system. During the changing of pumps, the

circuit breaker should have opened to shut off power to one of

the pumps. The 4,160 volt circuit breaker, however, failed to

open when it received the 'open' signal from plant operators.

The utility was preparing to start up the plant after a

lengthy outage when the circuit breaker failed. The plant has

remained shut down.

The Augmented Inspection Team (AIT) included electrical

specialists and other inspectors from the NRC's regional office

in Lisle, Illinois, and from its headquarters in Rockville,

Maryland.

The team will issue a written report in three to four weeks.

It will be available to the public.

#####
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-107 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Tuesday, July 22, 1997)

NRC CONSIDERS APPLICATION FOR SPENT FUEL STORAGE FACILITY

ON SKULL VALLEY GOSHUTE INDIAN RESERVATION IN UTAH

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is considering an

application from Private Fuel Storage Limited Liability Company

(PFS) for a license to store spent fuel from nuclear reactors in

a facility on the Skull Valley Goshute Indian Reservation in

Skull Valley, Utah, about 85 miles southwest of Salt Lake City.

The NRC will offer an opportunity for a hearing to persons

whose interests may be affected.

If granted, the license will authorize PFS to store spent

fuel in dry storage cask systems in an independent spent fuel

storage installation that the applicant proposes to construct and

operate on the reservation. Under NRC regulations, the term of

the license would be 20 years. NRC's review of the application

will include the development of an environmental impact

statement.

NRC will publish in the Federal Register soon a "Notice of

Consideration of Issuance of a Materials License for the Storage

of Spent Fuel and Notice of Opportunity for a Hearing." The

notice will include procedures that should be followed by persons

who wish to file a petition with the NRC for a hearing or a

petition to participate as a party in the hearing, if one is

held. The notice will also specify the date by which petitions

must be filed.

###
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Alfredo CASTRO-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41712.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Edward F. Garza, Corpus Christi, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Alfredo Castro-Gonzales (Castro) was convicted of illegal reentry following deportation. He argues on appeal that, in light of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), the district court erred by sentencing him under mandatory Sentencing Guidelines. He also argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

*331We review Castro’s first argument for plain error. *See United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 43, 163 L.Ed.2d 76 (2005). The district court’s application of the guidelines in their mandatory form constituted error that is plain. *See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d 728, 733 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 267, 163 L.Ed.2d 240 (2005). Castro concedes that he cannot meet the third prong of plain-error analysis, as a review of the record gives no indication that the judge would have sentenced him any differently had he known the guidelines were only advisory. *See Mares,*402 F.3d at 522. Castro also concedes that this court has rejected his argument that the application of mandatory guidelines is a structural error or is presumptively prejudicial. *See United States v. Malveaux,*411 F.3d 558, 560 n. 9 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 194, 163 L.Ed.2d 209 (2005). He nevertheless raises these arguments to preserve them for further review.

Castro’s constitutional challenge to § 1326(b) is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Castro contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert, denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Castro properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier ORTIZ-AROZENA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40666.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Javier Ortiz-Arozena appeals his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien present in the United States after deportation. The district court sentenced Ortiz to sixty-two months of imprisonment to be followed by a three-year term of supervised release. He challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Ortiz’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Ortiz contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains *359binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Ortiz properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (458)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          69,416
<DEPRECIATION>                                (36,734)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         20,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,558
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,569
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,889
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,391
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    69
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 727
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    857
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                857
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       857
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-77 July 2, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will have a press availability on

Thursday, July 9, to answer questions concerning renewal of the Calvert Cliffs nuclear

power plant’s operating license. The plant is located in Lusby, Md., and operated by

Baltimore Gas and Electric (BGE) Company.

Agency staff will meet with interested reporters at 12:30 p.m. at the Holiday Inn

Select in Solomons, Md., in the Grove Point Room.

The NRC staff has scheduled two public environmental scoping meetings for that

same day at the same location on BGE’s application to renew its license for the tworeactor facility. The first session will begin at 2 p.m. and continue until 5 p.m.; the

second will get under way at 7 p.m. and continue until 10 p.m.

Members of the public are invited to attend either meeting and comment on any

environmental issues the NRC should consider in its review of the proposed license

renewal.

Calvert Cliffs is the first U.S. commercial nuclear power plant to apply for an

extension of its NRC operating license.

#
#### Harry Rogers, Respondent, v. Isidor Goldberger, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 823.]
Memorandum To: Docket ID Number EPA - HQ - OAR - 2010 - 0505 for Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New and Modified Sources Re: EPA call with States on the September 18, 2015 , proposed oil and gas

actions Message: O n Sept. 18, EPA published in the Federal Register a suite of actions related to oil and gas emissions . The p urpose of this call is for EPA to answer questions states may have about the draft rules and draft CTG. Specifically, EPA wanted to circle back with the original group of states and California districts who self - nominated to speak with us this past spring. O thers from the National Oil and Gas Emission Inventory Committee were also invited. States Attended:

- New York

- Pennsylvania

- North Carolina

- Michigan

- Louisiana

- Oklahoma

- Kansas

- Colorado

- North Dakota

- California ARB

- Ventura Co.

- Santa Barbara Co.

- San Luis Obispo Co.

- Lia Parisien, ECOS

- Theresa Pella, CENSARA EPA Attended:

- David Cozz ie , OAQPS

- Alison Davis , OAQPS

- Bruce Moore , OAQPS

- Amy Hambrick , OAQPS

- Lisa Thompson , OAQPS

- Ravi Srivastava , OAQPS

- Cheryl Vetter , OAQPS

- Chris Stoneman, OAQPS

- Andrea Barbery, OCIR
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations as filed
as part of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           NOV-7-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                FEB-6-1999
<CASH>                                           7,895
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,234
<ALLOWANCES>                                       222
<INVENTORY>                                     85,829
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,577
<PP&E>                                          86,602
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,610
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 197,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,691
<BONDS>                                         45,872
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   197,776
<SALES>                                         51,228
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,865
<CGS>                                           36,857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (50)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,887)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,887)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.019)
        

</TABLE>
### §440. Civil action for enforcement by Secretary; jurisdiction

Whenever it shall appear that any person has violated or is about to violate any of the provisions of this subchapter, the Secretary may bring a civil action for such relief (including injunctions) as may be appropriate. Any such action may be brought in the district court of the United States where the violation occurred or, at the option of the parties, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

(Pub. L. 86–257, title II, §210, Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 530.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.80 Remission of duty; withdrawal; bond.

Imported salt in bond may be used in curing fish taken by vessels licensed to engage in the fisheries, and in curing fish in the shores of the navigable waters of the U.S., whether such fish are taken by licensed or unlicensed vessels, and upon proof that the sale has been used for either of such purposes, the duties on the same shall be remitted. (Section 313(e), Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1313(e)). Imported salt entered for warehouse may be withdrawn under bond for use in curing fish. Upon proof that the salt has been so used, the duties thereon shall be remitted. In no case shall the quantity of salt withdrawn exceed the reasonable requirements of the case. Withdrawal shall be made on Customs Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent. Each withdrawal shall contain the statement prescribed for withdrawals in § 144.32 of this chapter. When the withdrawal is made by a person other than the importer of record, a bond on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter for the production of proof of proper use shall be filed. Upon acceptance of the bond, a withdrawal permit shall be issued on Customs Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent.

[T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51251, Dec. 21, 1988, as amended by T.D. 95-81, 60 FR 52295, Oct. 6, 1995; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61284, Oct. 13, 2015]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsModeling the dissipation rate in rotating turbulent flowsA variety of modifications to the modeled dissipation rate transport equation that have been proposed during the past two decades to account for rotational strains are examined. The models are subjected to two crucial test cases: the decay of isotropic turbulence in a rotating frame and homogeneous shear flow in a rotating frame. It is demonstrated that these modifications do not yield substantially improved predictions for these two test cases and in many instances give rise to unphysical behavior. An alternative proposal, based on the use of the tensor dissipation rate, is made for the development of improved models.Document ID19910006993Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSpeziale, Charles G.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Raj, Rishi*(City Coll. of the City Univ. of New York NY., United States)*Gatski, Thomas B.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberICASE-90-88NASA-CR-187485NAS 1.26:187485AD-A232079Accession Number91N16306Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18605Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910006993.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 115.26 Eligibility.

Any manufacturer of containers to be manufactured in a type series from standard design and specifications so that each container has identical characteristics, may apply for approval by design type.
### pd-0832-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/31/2015 10:31:32 AM Accepted 12/31/2015 2:17:59 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK