alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.1019 Fungible goods and materials. ( a ) *General.* A person claiming that a fungible good or material is an originating good may base the claim either on the physical segregation of each fungible good or material or by using an inventory management method with respect to the fungible good or material. For purposes of this section, the term “*inventory management method*” means: ( 1 ) Averaging;
( 2 ) “Last-in, first-out;”
( 3 ) “First-in, first-out;” or
( 4 ) Any other method that is recognized in the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles of the Party in which the production is performed or otherwise accepted by that country.
( b ) *Duration of use.* A person selecting an inventory management method under paragraph (a) of this section for a particular fungible good or material must continue to use that method for that fungible good or material throughout the fiscal year of that person.
### §121b–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 121b–1 was editorially reclassified as section 6634 of this title.
§ 300.3 Financial assistance. ( a ) The Regional Administrator may provide to States upon written request by the State Governor or an authorized representative, an annual improvement grant up to $50,000, but not to exceed 50 percent of eligible costs, except where separate legislation requires or permits a waiver of the State's matching share, e.g., with respect to “insular areas”, as that term is defined at 48 U.S.C. 1469a(d). The nonFederal share in all cases may exceed the Federal share.
( b ) The improvement grant shall be product-oriented; that is, it must produce something measurable in a way that determines specific results, to substantiate compliance with the grant workplan objectives and to evidence contribution to the State's disaster capability. The following list, *which is neither exhaustive nor ranked in priority order,* offers examples of eligible products under the Disaster Preparedness Improvement Grant Program: ( 1 ) Evaluations of natural hazards and development of the programs and actions required to mitigate such hazards;
( 2 ) Hazard mitigation activities, including development of predisaster natural hazard mitigation plans, policies, programs and strategies for State-level multi-hazard mitigation;
( 3 ) Updates to State disaster assistance plans, including plans for the Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program, Public Assistance Program, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, Disaster Application Center operations, damage assessment, etc.;
( 4 ) Handbooks to implement State disaster assistance program activities;
( 5 ) Exercise materials (EXPLAN, scenario, injects, etc.) to test and exercise procedures for State efforts in disaster response, including provision of individual and public assistance;
( 6 ) Standard operating procedures for individual State agencies to execute disaster responsibilities for IFG, crisis counseling, mass care or other functional responsibilities;
( 7 ) Training for State employees in their responsibilities under the State's disaster assistance plan;
( 8 ) Report of formal analysis of State enabling legislation and other authorities to ensure efficient processing by the State of applications by governmental entities and individuals for Federal disaster relief;
( 9 ) An inventory of updated inventory of State/local critical facilities (including State/local emergency operations centers) and their proximity to identified hazard areas;
( 10 ) A tracking system of critical actions (identified in postdisaster critiques) to be executed by State or local governments to improve disaster assistance capabilities or reduce vulnerability to natural hazards.
( 11 ) Plans or procedures for dealing with disasters not receiving supplementary Federal assistance;
( 12 ) Damage assessment plans or procedures;
( 13 ) Procedures for search and rescue operations; and,
( 14 ) Disaster accounting procedures.
( c ) The State shall provide quarterly financial and performance reports to the Regional Administrator. Reporting shall be by program quarter unless otherwise agreed to by the Regional Administrator.
[54 FR 2129, Jan. 19, 1989]
§ 102.23 Origin and Manufacturer Identification. ( a ) *Textile or apparel product manufacturer identification.* All commercial importations of textile or apparel products must identify on CBP Form 3461, or its electronic equivalent, (Entry/Immediate Delivery) and CBP Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent, (Entry Summary), and in all electronic data transmissions that require identification of the manufacturer, the manufacturer of such products through a manufacturer identification code (MID) constructed from the name and address of the entity performing the origin-conferring operations pursuant to § 102.21 or § 102.22 of this part, as applicable. The code must be accurately constructed using the methodology set forth in the appendix to this part, including the use of the two-letter International Organization for Standardization (ISO) code for the country of origin of such products. When a single entry is filed for products of more than one manufacturer, the products of each manufacturer must be separately identified. Importers must be able to demonstrate to CBP their use of reasonable care in determining the manufacturer. If an entry filed for such merchandise fails to include the MID properly constructed from the name and address of the manufacturer, the Center director may reject the entry or take other appropriate action. For purposes of this paragraph, “textile or apparel products” means goods classifiable in Section XI, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), and goods classifiable in any 10-digit HTSUS number outside of Section XI with a three-digit textile category number assigned to the specific subheading.
( b ) *Incomplete or insufficient information.* If the Center director is unable to determine the country of origin of a textile or apparel product, the importer must submit additional information as requested by the Center director. Release of the product from CBP custody will be denied until a determination of the country of origin is made based upon the information provided or the best information available.
( c ) *Date of exportation.* For quota, visa or export license requirements, and statistical purposes, the date of exportation for textile or apparel products listed in § 102.21(b)(5) will be the date the vessel or carrier leaves the last port in the country of origin, as determined by application of § 102.21 or § 102.22, as applicable. Contingency of diversion in another foreign territory or country will not change the date of exportation for quota, visa or export license requirements or for statistical purposes.
[CBP Dec. 05-32, 70 FR 58013, Oct. 5, 2005, as amended at CBP Dec. 11-09, 76 FR 14584, Mar. 17, 2011; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61286, Oct. 13, 2015; CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93017, Dec. 20, 2016]
Exhibit
32.1





Ener1,
Inc.


1540
Broadway, Suite 25C


New York,
New York 10036





August 6,
2009





Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, NE


Washington,
DC 20549





Re:
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350





Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ener1, Inc.,
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, I, Charles Gassenheimer, Chief Executive Officer of Ener1, Inc.,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended June
      30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





2)
            the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ener1,
      Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Ener1, Inc.





/s/
      Charles GassenheimerCharles
      Gassenheimer
                    Chief
      Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
                    (Principal
      Executive Officer and
                    Duly
      Authorized
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





This
certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to Ener1, Inc.’s
quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
filing.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_______ _______ __________ No. ACM S32399

_______ _______ __________ UNITED STATES Appellee

v . Jo h nath a n R

. WILLIAMS Senior Airman (E

- 4) , U.S . Air Force, Appellant

_______ _______ __________ Appeal from the United S tates Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 5 July 2017

_______ _______ __________ Military Judge: L. Martin Powell

. Approved sentence: Bad

- conduct discharge , confinement for five months, and reduction to E

- 1 . Sentence adjudged 11 March 2016 by SpCM convened at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana

. For Appellant: Major Jarett Merk , USAF. For Appellee: Gerald R. Bruce , Esquire

. Before DREW , J. BROWN , and HARDING , Appellate Military Jud ges
.

_______ _______ __________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

_______ _______ __________

PE R CURIAM : The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, an d no error materially prejudicial to Appellant ’ s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c).United States v. Williams , No. ACM S32399

2 Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

KURT J. BRUBAKER Clerk of the Court
OFFICE OF 

Jimmy Harris 

Madison County Mayor 

Mr. Scott Faulk 

Essential Air Service Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. Faulk: 

December 23, 2014 

100 East Main, Suite 302 

Jackson, Tennessee 38301 

Phone: 731-423-6020 

Fax: 731-988-3820 

As you are aware, our past EAS carriers have not been able to increase our 

passenger count to an acceptable level for our airport. There have been various 

issues with these carriers leading to this problem but, I believe, the overriding 

factors with these carriers have been the routes (Memphis & Nashville), their dismal 

customer service and their lack of promotion in our community. We now have a 

carrier bidding on this service, Air Choice One, who brings a successful track record 

of service to other EAS communities and a proposed route to St. Louis. I think Air 

Choice One will bring better service to our community. After meetings and 

discussions with many business and industrial leaders in Jackson with Air Choice 

One, we are convinced they can build a successful airline service for our community. 

The Jackson-Madison County Airport Authority has indorsed the selection of Air 

Choice One to provide service for Jackson, Madison County, Tennessee. I join in 

their decision and hope you will consider our community's endorsement in making 

your decision. 

Should you wish to discuss this issue, please give me a call.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-98-61 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Thursday, October 15, 1998)

NRC RATES TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT "SUPERIOR"

IN ALL FOUR AREAS OF LATEST ASSESSMENT REPORT

The Turkey Point nuclear power plant, operated by Florida Power & Light Company near

Homestead, Florida, has received performance ratings of "superior" in all four areas of the

Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s latest Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance

(SALP) report for the facility

The report, dated October 1, evaluates the plant's performance from August 18, 1996

through August 22 of this year.

NRC and FP&L officials will discuss the report during a meeting set for 1:30 p.m. Thursday,

October 22, at the Turkey Point site. The meeting is open for public observation, and

NRC officials will be available afterwards to speak with reporters, state and local officials,

and members of the public.

The NRC SALP process rates licensees in four functional areas — plant operations,

maintenance, engineering, and plant support — and assigns ratings of Category 1, 2 or 3,

depending on whether performance in those areas was superior, good or adequate.

The report on Turkey Point gives the plant a Category 1 rating in plant operations,

maintenance, engineering and plant support, indicating "superior" performance. The

ratings in the plant’s two previous SALP reports were also Category 1 in all four areas.

In his cover letter to the report, NRC Regional Administrator Luis Reyes said “contributors

to this performance were your conservative decisions relative to the probability of risk in

the plant’s operation, self-assessment and quality assurance processes” which were “

effective in identifying and resolving problems,” and “ effective use of lessons learned to

prevent repetitive problems.”

This SALP report for Turkey Point will be the final one for that plant under the NRC

assessment program which has been in effect for many years. The Commission last

month approved suspension of the SALP process until completion of a review of the

agency’s nuclear power plant performance assessment system. The Commission is

seeking public comments on techniques that might be used in developing a new

assessment method.

###
EDITORS: A copy of the full SALP report is available from this office. SALP reports are also

available on the NRC's Internet web site (www.nrc.gov/OPA).
:;y^"ORtAIiON 

- ^ ! . O ! ^ 

SERVED APRIL 8, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATS ^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASfflNGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYDIVE KENTUCKY LLC, 

Respondent. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09CEOOO4 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMS NO. FAA-2009-1047 

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S ORDER 

CHANGING DATE OF HEARING 

Owing to a scheduling conflict, it has become necessary to change the 

date of the hearing by one day. The hearing will be held on June 8, 2010 

rather than the June 9, 2010 date set forth in my order of March 9, 2010. 

If this change creates any visible inconvenience to either party, please 

notify me as soon as possible. 

The location of the hearing remains Louisville, Kentucky. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP09CE0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building -Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Allen K. Gailor, Respondent's Counsel 

The Gailor Law Office, PLLC 

100 Professional Arts Building 

730 West Market Street 

Louisville, Kentucky 40202 

TEL: 502-584-7217 

FAX: 502-584-4848 

Taneesha D. Marshall, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New^ Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following 

address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
### Geologic studies in the Basin and Range-Colorado Plateau transition in southeastern Nevada, southwestern Utah, and northwestern Arizona, 1995

By: Florian MaldonadoL. David Nealey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b2153

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Chapter F Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Chapter F Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Chapter G Plate 1**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-127 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, July 28, 1998)

NRC ORDER TO TU ELECTRIC CONFIRMS FIRE BARRIER CORRECTIVE

ACTIONS AT COMANCHE PEAK UNIT 1

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a confirmatory order to TU

Electric confirming its commitment to complete Thermo-Lag fire barrier corrective

actions by December 31 at its Comanche Peak Unit 1 nuclear power plant in Somervell

County, Texas.

Sam Collins, Director of the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, said

the order was issued because of concern “that some licensees may not be making

adequate progress toward resolving the plant-specific issues, and that some

implementation schedules may either be too tenuous or too protracted.”

Thermo-Lag is a fire barrier material manufactured and supplied by Thermal

Science, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, and has been used to provide fire resistance to

wiring and equipment at nuclear plants. The NRC has been concerned that ThermoLag 330-1 fire barrier material installed by some of its licensees may not provide the

intended level of fire protection and that licensees thus may not be meeting regulatory

requirements. Between 1992 and 1994, the NRC staff issued letters to all nuclear

utilities asking licensees to submit plans and schedules for resolving the issue. All

licensees with Thermo-Lag fire barriers have implemented around-the-clock “fire

watches,” using workers to patrol vital plant areas on a regular basis to watch for signs

of fire until corrective actions have been completed.

In a letter to TU Electric officials, Collins noted that NRC has met with licensees

to review their progress in completing implementation of their fire barrier programs, but

remains concerned about slow progress on resolution of the issue.

TU Electric was one of the licensees with which NRC has periodically held

meetings. At these meetings, the NRC reviewed the company’s schedule for ThermoLag corrective actions and concluded they are reasonable. The company formally

agreed June 2 to the terms of the confirmatory order. Thermo-Lag corrective actions at

Comanche Peak are complete at Unit 2 ; most of the work is complete at Unit 1.
-2-

About 20 other plants have received or will soon receive similar orders in the

coming months.

##

Additional information on Thermo-Lag fire barriers can be found on the NRC

Internet web page at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/gmo/tip/tip9826.htm
### §1452. Penalty for failure to provide notice

Any person who fails, without reasonable cause, to provide a notice required under this subtitle or any implementing regulations shall be liable to the corporation in an amount up to $100 for each day for which such failure continues. The corporation may bring a civil action against any such person in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia or in any district court of the United States within the jurisdiction of which the plan assets are located, the plan is administered, or a defendant resides or does business, and process may be served in any district where a defendant resides, does business, or may be found.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title IV, §4302, as added Pub. L. 96–364, title I, §104(2), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1263.)