alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
steam

_ record - Re: FW: Steam Electric Power In formation Request - E xtension Request

Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your exte nsion request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for JT Deely (P lant ID:04017) and OW Sommers (Plant ID:03141) was received. Extension requests will be ev aluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date. Verification of delivery status of questionnaire package for JK Pruce was forwarded to the steam electric helpline. You should hear back from them soon with tracking information.

Sincerely, From: <Alicea.Jezebele @ epamail.epa. gov> To: "Tieken, Gregg R." <GRTieken@CPSEnergy.com>
Date: 7/15/2010 7:08 AM
Sub j ect: Re: FW: Steam Electric Power Information Request - Extension Request Pa g e 1 of 2

8/17/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3EB403D

...
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-162 October 19, 2000

NRC SEEKS TOPICS FOR 13th ANNUAL REGULATORY INFORMATION

CONFERENCE MARCH 12-14

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking suggestions for topics to discuss at the next

Regulatory Information Conference (RIC) to be held March 12-14 at the Capital Hilton Hotel in

Washington, D.C.

Suggestions for conference topics can be submitted electronically through November 15 at the

RIC web site: http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/REACTOR/RIC/RICREG/index.html

The RIC web site contains a list of topics respondents can consider to assist the NRC's

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation in planning the conference agenda, as well as space for

comments and other suggestions. The final program agenda will be posted to the web site after

January 7, and will feature on-line registration for the conference.

For additional information or questions, contact Sharon Bell at (301) 415-1217 or via e-mail:

sab1@nrc.gov

###
Exhibit 32.2



LASER MORTGAGE MANAGEMENT, INC.



Section 1350 Certification



In connection with the periodic report of LASER Mortgage Management, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Charles R. Howe, II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                     |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 29, 2004 |  | /s/ Charles R. Howe, II                              
|                     |  | Charles R. Howe, II                                  
|                     |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### § 12.12 Release under bond.

Plants or plant products which require fumigation, disinfection, sterilization, or other treatment as a condition of entry may be released to the permittee for treatment at a plant approved by the Department of Agriculture upon the giving of a bond on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter to insure that the merchandise is treated under the supervision and to the satisfaction of an inspector of the Department of Agriculture or returned to Customs custody when demanded by the port director.

[28 FR 14710, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41167, Oct. 19, 1984]
§ 111.76 Reopening the case. ( a ) *Grounds for reopening.* Provided that no appeal is filed in accordance with § 111.75, a person whose license or permit has been suspended or revoked, or against whom a monetary penalty has been assessed in lieu of suspension or revocation, may make application to the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, to reopen the case and have the order of suspension or revocation or monetary penalty assessment set aside or modified on the ground that new evidence has been discovered or on the ground that important evidence is now available which could not be produced at the original hearing by the exercise of due diligence. The application must set forth the precise character of the evidence to be relied upon and must state the reasons why the applicant was unable to produce it when the original charges were heard.
( b ) *Procedure.* The appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, will forward the application, together with a recommendation for action thereon, to the Executive Assistant Commissioner. The Executive Assistant Commissioner may grant or deny the application to reopen the case and may order the taking of additional testimony before the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade. The appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, will notify the applicant of the decision by the Executive Assistant Commissioner. If the Executive Assistant Commissioner grants the application and orders a hearing, the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, will set a time and place for the hearing and give due written notice of the hearing to the applicant. The procedures governing the new hearing and recommended decision of the hearing officer will be the same as those governing the original proceeding. The original order of the Executive Assistant Commissioner will remain in effect pending conclusion of the new proceedings and issuance of a new order under § 111.77.
[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63320, Oct. 18, 2022]
§ 302.16 Accountability. ( a ) *General.* Each Recipient must submit reports to EDA at intervals and in the manner that EDA shall require, except that EDA shall not require any report to be submitted more than ten years after the date of closeout of the Investment Assistance.
( b ) *Data on Project effectiveness.* Each report must contain a data-specific evaluation of the effectiveness of the Investment Assistance provided in fulfilling the Project's purpose (including alleviation of economic distress and meeting Project goals) and in meeting the objectives of PWEDA. Data used by a Recipient in preparing reports shall be accurate and verifiable as determined by EDA, and from independent sources (whenever possible). EDA will use this data and report to fulfill its performance measurement reporting requirements under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, as amended (Pub. L. 103-62) and to monitor internal, Investment, and Project performance through an internal performance measurement system.
( c ) *Reporting Project service benefits.* To enable EDA to determine the economic development effect of a Project that provides service benefits, EDA may require the Recipient to submit a Project service map and information from which to determine whether services are provided to all segments of the Region being assisted.
( d ) *Consequences for failure to undertake good faith efforts.* ( 1 ) The Recipient must undertake good faith efforts to fulfill the purpose of the Project as set out in the terms of the Investment Assistance and must report regularly on Project goals. In the event that EDA determines that the Recipient is failing to make good faith efforts to meet these goals, or otherwise is failing to meets its obligations under the Investment Assistance, EDA shall take necessary actions to protect EDA's interest in the Project, including the following: ( i ) Discontinue disbursement of funds pending correction;
( ii ) Suspend the Investment Assistance;
( iii ) Terminate the Investment Assistance;
( iv ) Require reimbursement of the EDA share of the Project; or
( v ) Institute formal Government-wide debarment and suspension proceedings against the Recipient.
( 2 ) Before making a determination under this subsection, EDA shall provide the Recipient with reasonable notice and opportunity to respond. A determination under this subsection is final and cannot be appealed.
[79 FR 76129, Dec. 19, 2014]
### §43d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 43d was editorially reclassified as section 6311 of this title.
### §2104. Publication of list of works of art, historical objects, and exhibits

The Commission shall, from time to time, but at least once every ten years, publish as a Senate document a list of all works of art, historical objects, and exhibits currently within the Senate wing of the Capitol and the Senate Office Buildings, together with their description, location, and with such notes as may be pertinent to their history.

(Pub. L. 100–696, title IX, §901(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4610.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 188b–3 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

Section is based on section 4 of Senate Resolution No. 382, Ninetieth Congress, Oct. 1, 1968, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 100–696.
#### In the Matter of Motor Club of America, Appellant, against Thomas J. Curran, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Santry, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1083.]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except in the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-11111

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CORNELIUS JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:97-CR-30-A-1

- - - - - - - - - -

August 31, 1998

Before WISDOM, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cornelius Jackson appeals his jury-verdict conviction for

two counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base

and one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine. 

Jackson argues that the district court erroneously admitted

evidence of extrinsic acts and that it erroneously denied his

motion for leave to file a motion for a new trial.

A district court’s determination of the relevance and

admissibility of evidence is reviewed for abuse of discretion. 

United States v. Scott, 48 F.3d 1389, 1396 (5th Cir. 1995). The 
No. 97-11111 

-2-

admissibility of extrinsic evidence is governed by FED. R. EVID.

404(b). We apply a two-pronged test to determine the

admissibility of evidence under FED. R. EVID. 404(b). “First, the

evidence must be relevant to an issue other than the defendant's

character. Second, the evidence must have probative value that

is not substantially outweighed by undue prejudice.” United

States v. Misher, 99 F.3d 664, 670 (5th Cir. 1996), citing United

States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), 

cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 73 (1997). The extrinsic-act evidence

offered in this case involved Jackson's possession of a large sum

of money while traveling through the Dallas/Fort Worth Airport. 

The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting this

evidence to show intent. See Scott, 48 F.3d at 1396. Further,

any potential undue prejudice was eliminated by the court's

instructions. See United States v. Bailey, 111 F.3d 1229, 1234

(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 327 (1997).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying

Jackson's motion for leave to file a motion for a new trial. 

Jackson’s motion was filed more than seven days after the jury's

verdict and was based on the ineffective assistance of counsel

allegedly caused by a conflict of interest. "[R]aising an

ineffectiveness claim through the mechanism of a new trial motion

based on newly discovered evidence is wholly impermissible." 

United States v. Medina, 118 F.3d 371, 373 (5th Cir. 1997). See

FED. R. CRIM. P. 33.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.606 Filing of claim for tariff preference level. Apparel goods of a Party described in § 10.607 of this subpart that do not qualify as originating goods under § 10.594 of this subpart may nevertheless be entitled to preferential tariff treatment under the CAFTA-DR under an applicable tariff preference level (TPL). To make a TPL claim, the importer must include on the entry summary, or equivalent documentation, the applicable subheading in Chapter 98 or 99 of the HTSUS immediately above the applicable subheading in Chapter 61 or 62 of the HTSUS under which each non-originating apparel good is classified. The applicable Chapter 98 and 99 subheadings are: ( a ) Subheading 9822.05.11 or 9822.05.13 for goods described in § 10.607(a);
( b ) Subheading 9915.61.01 for goods described in § 10.607(b) and (c);
( c ) Subheading 9915.62.05 for goods described in § 10.607(d);
( d ) Subheading 9915.62.15 for goods described in § 10.607(e); and
( e ) Subheading 9915.61.03 or 9915.61.04 for goods described in § 10.607(f);
[CBP Dec. 10-26, 75 FR 50699, Aug. 17, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE UNAUDITED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EASTERN AMERICAN
NATURAL GAS TRUST AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,858
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,233,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,235,688
<PP&E>                                      93,162,180
<DEPRECIATION>                              32,989,193 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,408,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,235,688
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  60,172,987
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                62,408,674 
<SALES>                                      7,742,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,742,352
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  887,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               349,007
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (5,513)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,349,634
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,511,160
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                838,474
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,349,634
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.24
        

</TABLE>
### §1533. Small government agency plan

#### (a) Effects on small governments

Before establishing any regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments, agencies shall have developed a plan under which the agency shall—

(1) provide notice of the requirements to potentially affected small governments, if any;

(2) enable officials of affected small governments to provide meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory proposals containing significant Federal intergovernmental mandates; and

(3) inform, educate, and advise small governments on compliance with the requirements.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to each agency to carry out the provisions of this section and for no other purpose, such sums as are necessary.

(Pub. L. 104–4, title II, §203, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 65.)
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Region II

101 Marietta Street, Suite 2900

Atlanta, GA 30323

No: II-96-87 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Tuesday, October 22, 1996)

Roger Hannah 404-331-7878

NRC STAFF ISSUES ORDER MODIFYING PHYSICIAN'S RADIOACTIVE

MATERIALS LICENSE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued an order

modifying the NRC license held by Dr. Jose L. Fernandez, a

physician in Puerto Rico, for failure to comply with agency

requirements. The order is effective immediately.

Dr. Fernandez held an NRC license authorizing him to use

NRC-licensed materials (strontium-90 eye applicator) to treat eye

conditions at facilities in San Juan and Mayaguez, Puerto Rico.

That license expired in February of this year and NRC regulations

allow him to possess but not use the licensed material until his

license is officially terminated by the NRC.

NRC inspections determined the licensee used a strontium-90

eye aplicator with an incorrect calibration of dose rate. As a

result, there were a number of medical misadministrations. Since

February of this year, Dr. Fernandez has repeatedly failed to

review records to identify affected patients and notify the

patients of this fact.

The order requires Dr. Fernandez to hire an independent

consultant (with NRC approval) to review patient radiation dose

records, to submit a final report to the NRC, to notify all

individuals who received misadministrations, and to safely store

the radioactive sources and transfer them to an authorized

recipient within 90 days.

In the order, Hugh L. Thompson, Deputy Executive Director

for Nuclear Materials Safety, Safeguards, and Operations Support,

said, "I have concluded that the Licensee has failed to comply

with a number of significant NRC requirements and that the

actions [in the order] are required to protect the public health

and safety."

Dr. Fernandez has 20 days to respond to the order or to

request a hearing. Such a request will not stay the immediate

effectiveness of this order.

#
§ 80.3 Definitions. ( a ) Except as noted in this part, the definitions applicable to the funding program apply to implementation of this part. In addition, for purposes of this part:
( b ) *Applicant* means a State or Indian Tribal government applying to FEMA for a Federal award that will be accountable for the use of funds. Once funds have been awarded, the applicant becomes the recipient and may also be a pass-through entity.
( c ) *Federal award* means the Federal financial assistance that a recipient or subrecipient receives directly from FEMA or indirectly from a pass-through entity. The terms “award” and “grant” may also be used to describe a “Federal award” under this part.
( d ) *Market Value* means the price that the seller is willing to accept and a buyer is willing to pay on the open market and in an arm's length transaction.
( e ) *National of the United States* means a person within the meaning of the term as defined in the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22).
( f ) *Pass-through entity* means a recipient that provides a subaward to a subrecipient.
( g ) *Purchase offer* is the initial value assigned to the property, which is later adjusted by applicable additions and deductions, resulting in a final offer amount to a property owner.
( h ) *Qualified alien* means a person within the meaning of the term as defined at 8 U.S.C. 1641.
( i ) *Qualified conservation organization* means a qualified organization with a conservation purpose pursuant to 26 CFR 1.170A-14 and applicable implementing regulations, that is such an organization at the time it acquires the property interest and that was such an organization at the time of the major disaster declaration, or for at least 2 years prior to the opening of the grant application period.
( j ) *Recipient* means the State or Tribal government that receives a Federal award directly from FEMA. A recipient may also be a pass-through entity. The term recipient does not include subrecipients.
( k ) *Subapplicant* means the entity that submits an application for FEMA mitigation assistance to the State or Indian Tribal applicant/recipient. With respect to open space acquisition projects under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), this term has the same meaning as given to the term “applicant” in part 206, subpart N of this chapter. Upon grant award, the subapplicant is referred to as the subrecipient.
( l ) *Subaward* means an award provided by a pass-through entity to a subrecipient, for the subrecipient to carry out part of a Federal award received by the pass-through entity.
( m ) *Subrecipient* means the State agency, community or Indian Tribal government or other legal entity to which a subaward is awarded and which is accountable to the recipient for the use of the funds provided.
( n ) *Administrator* means the head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or his/her designated representative.
( o ) *Regional Administrator* means the head of a Federal Emergency Management Agency regional office, or his/her designated representative.
[86 FR 50670, Sept. 10, 2021]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10046

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

VIRGIL LANE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:09-CR-50-1

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Virgil Lane presents

arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Whaley, 577 F.3d

254, 258-61 (5th Cir. 2009), in which this court rejected constitutional challenges

to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act. The Government’s motion

for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 22, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-10046 Document: 00511150238 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
#### § 133.11 Trade names eligible for recordation.

The name or trade style used for at least 6 months to identify a manufacturer or trader may be recorded with the United States Customs Service. Words or designs used as trademarks, whether or not registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office shall not be accepted for recordation as a trade name. Generally, the complete business name will be recorded unless convincing proof establishes that only a part of the complete name is customarily used.

[T.D. 72-266, 37 FR 20678, Oct. 3, 1972, as amended by T.D. 91-77, 56 FR 46115, Sept. 10, 1991]
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph D. McGoldrick, as State Rent Administrator, Respondent, against Christopher West et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 857.]
### §48. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 48 was editorially reclassified as section 5307 of this title.