alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7633

HUGH MAURICE ALLEN WADE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-1448-H) Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 27, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hugh Maurice Allen Wade, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant AttorneyGeneral, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Hugh Maurice Allen Wade seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Wade v. State of Maryland , No. CA-98-1448-H (D. Md. Oct. 26, 1998). We grant Wade’s motion to enlarge, explicate and amend his informal brief. We deny his motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,054,603
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,000,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,079,062
<PP&E>                                         279,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,305,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,544
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       229,791
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,020,597
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,305,932
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,019
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,432,792
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,392,773)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### §§ 204.55-204.60 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      36,253,772
<SECURITIES>                                    64,504
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,380,802
<ALLOWANCES>                                   185,575
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,243,647
<PP&E>                                      13,801,947
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,243,273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,841,871 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,842,630
<BONDS>                                      5,011,235
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,500,004
<COMMON>                                        15,221
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,472,781
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,841,871
<SALES>                                      5,621,635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,621,635
<CGS>                                        4,945,920
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,945,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (112,999)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             242,529
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                107,332
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            107,332
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   107,332
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.45)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s / Michael J. RossMichael J. Ross
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
 42
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             130
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,516,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,518,491
<PP&E>                                         279,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,731,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,383
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       229,801
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,428,595
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,731,779
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,304
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,372,232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,325,928)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-47   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 1 of 6

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-47   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 2 of 6

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-47   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 3 of 6

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-47   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 4 of 6

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-47   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 5 of 6

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-47   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 6 of 6

- Vlieger Shay PDF 711
- Vlieger Shay PDF 712
- Vlieger Shay PDF 713-16
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-100 November 20, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE

WITH MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ON APPARENT VIOLATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet

November 21 with representatives of the Michigan Department of

Transportation, Lansing, Michigan, for a predecisional

enforcement conference on apparent radiation safety violations.

The meeting will start at 10:00 a.m. in the Third Floor

Conference Room of the NRC Region III Office, 801 Warrenville

Road, Lisle, Illinois. It is open to public observation. NRC

officials will be available at its conclusion to answer questions

from the news media and other interested observers.

The discussion will focus on two incidents in September and

October in which the agency apparently failed to maintain control

of two nuclear gauges. Portable gauges containing small amounts

of radioactive material are used by the agency to measure the

moisture, density, and asphalt content of construction materials

at temporary job sites.

In the first incident, an operator in Warren, Michigan,

forgetting that he had placed the gauge in front of his vehicle,

ran into it. The second incident occurred in Wayne, Michigan.

After conducting a test with a nuclear gauge, an operator went to

his vehicle to prepare equipment for testing. While he was about

15 feet from the gauge, a piece of heavy equipment (a grader) ran

over it.

In both cases, only the outer portions of the gauges were

damaged. The radioactive sources remained intact. Therefore,

neither incident resulted in radiation exposures to the operators

or the public.

Another apparent violation that will be discussed is the

failure by the agency’s radiation safety officer to present, as

required, findings of an annual audit to management. This

violation was identified by an NRC inspector in October.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean

the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that
enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety

significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out

any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report;

and to enable the company to outline its proposed corrective

actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated

enforcement action, such as a fine, will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later date.

####
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.:1:20-22738-CV-UNGARO

OYDUMIS ABREU

on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALPINE TOWING, INC., a Florida Profit Corporation and 

LARRY J. SARAVIA, Individually

Defendant(s)

________________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff, OYDUMIS ABREU by and through his undersigned counsel, and in agreement with 

Defendants, ALPINE TOWING INC., and LARRY J. SARAVIA hereby provides notice that the 

parties have reached a settlement of all claims in this case. The parties are in the process of 

finalizing the agreement and preparing the dismissal documents, which will be filed with the Court 

upon completion.

Dated: August 27, 2020

 PEREGONZA THE ATTORNEYS, PLLC

1414 NW 107th Ave, 

Suite 302

Doral, FL 33172

Tel. (786) 650-0202

Fax. (786) 650-0200

By: /s/Nathaly Saavedra

Nathaly Saavedra, Esq. 

Fla. Bar No. 118315

Email: nathaly@peregonza.com

Case 1:20-cv-22738-UU Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2020 Page 1 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August 27, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached Service 

List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by 

CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized 

to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

/s/Nathaly Saavedra

Nathaly Saavedra, Esq. 

Case 1:20-cv-22738-UU Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2020 Page 2 of 3
SERVICE LIST

Nathaly Saavedra, Esq. 

Fla. Bar No. 118315

Email: nathaly@peregonza.com

PEREGONZA THE ATTORNEYS, PLLC

1414 NW 107th Ave, 

Suite 302

Doral, FL 33172

Tel. (786) 650-0202

Fax. (786) 650-0200

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dino G. Galardi 

Fla. Bar No. 628220 

Email: dgalardi@fowler-white.com 

Lindsay M. Massillon 

Fla. Bar No. 92098 

Email: lmassillon@fowler-white.com 

FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A. 

Brickell Arch, Fourteenth Floor 

1395 Brickell Avenue 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 789-9200 

Facsimile: (305) 789-9201

Attorneys for Defendants

Method Service: CM/ECF Notice 

Case 1:20-cv-22738-UU Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2020 Page 3 of 3
§ 122.176 Removal from ACSPP. ( a ) *Grounds for removal from ACSSPP.* The Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, may revoke or supend the privilege of operating as a member of the ACSPP if: ( 1 ) Acceptance into the program was gained through fraud or the misstatement of a material fact;
( 2 ) The carrier refuses or neglects to obey any proper order of a Customs officer or any Customs order, rule, or regulation relative to its cooperation within the program;
( 3 ) An officer of the carrier or corporation which has been accepted into the program is convicted of a felony or misdemeanor involving theft, smuggling, or other theft-connected crime which was committed in his or her official capacity as an officer of the carrier, or is convicted of any Customs-related crime;
( 4 ) The carrier fails to retain merchandise which has been designated for examination;
( 5 ) The carrier does not provide secure facilities or properly safeguard merchandise within its area of control; or
( 6 ) The carrier fails to observe any of the procedures which it had set forth in the SOP which served as the basis for the carrier's acceptance into the program; and
( 7 ) The carrier has been notified in writing that it has been found in noncompliance with a provision of the program and has failed to correct such noncompliance after having been given a reasonable opportunity to correct such noncompliance.
( b ) *Notice and appeal.* The Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, shall suspend or remove participants from the ACSPP by serving notice of the proposed action upon the carrier in writing. The notice shall be in the form of a statement specifically setting forth the grounds for suspension or removal and shall provide the carrier with notice that it may file a written notice of appeal from suspension or revocation within 10 days following receipt of the notice of revocation or suspension. The notice of appeal shall be filed in duplicate to the office of the Assistant Commissioner, Field Operations, and shall set forth response of the carrier to the statement of the Assistant Commissioner.
( c ) *Notice of decision.* The Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, shall notify the participating carrier in writing of the decision concerning continued participation in the program.
( d ) *Use of uniform criteria.* When making any determination regarding a carrier's participation or continuation in the ACSPP, the Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, shall employ a uniform standard of performance and evaluation.
[T.D. 91-25, 56 FR 12347, Mar. 25, 1991, as amended by T.D. 91-77, 56 FR 46115, Sept. 10, 1991; T.D. 99-27, 64 FR 13675, Mar. 22, 1999]
BF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0026

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

THOMAS WOJTOWICZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including January 2, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 21 2023

11/21/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0026
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
JUNE 30, 1996 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,090
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                       735
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,087
<PP&E>                                         108,440
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,274
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           719
<OTHER-SE>                                      97,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,382
<SALES>                                        108,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,445
<CGS>                                           76,930
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   99,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   738
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (256)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,677
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,198
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,479
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,479
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
§ 112.11 Carriers which may be authorized. ( a ) *From port to port in the United States.* The port director may authorize the following types of carriers to receive merchandise for transportation in bond from one port to another in the United States upon compliance with the provisions of this subpart: ( 1 ) Common carriers.
( 2 ) Contract carriers.
( 3 ) Freight forwarders.
( 4 ) Private carriers, if: ( i ) The merchandise (including containerized merchandise) to be transported is the property of the private carrier; and
( ii ) The private carrier files a bond on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.63 of this chapter,
( b ) *Between ports in Canada or Mexico through the United States.* Canadian and Mexican motor vehicle common carriers may be authorized to transport merchandise under bond between ports in Canada or Mexico through the United States (see part 123 of this chapter), upon compliance with the provisions of this subpart.
[T.D. 73-140, 38 FR 13551, May 23, 1973, as amended by T.D. 81-243, 46 FR 45602, Sept. 14, 1981; T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984]
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(a)

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the references made to our firm under the caption "Financial
Statements" and to the use of our reports as follows: our report dated March 29,
2002 (except for footnote 7, as to which the date is December 20, 2002), with
respect to the financial statements of Separate Account VA-1 of The American
Franklin Life Insurance Company ("American Franklin"); our report dated February
1, 2002 (except for footnote 14, as to which the date is December 20, 2002),
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of American General Life
Insurance Company ("AGL"); our report dated May 3, 2002 (except for footnote 15,
as to which the date is December 20, 2002), with respect to the statutory-basis
financial statements of All American Life Insurance Company; our report dated
February 5, 2002 (except for footnote 12, as to which the date is December 20,
2002), with respect to the financial statements of American Franklin; and our
report dated February 5, 2002 (except for footnote 14, as to which the date is
December 20, 2002), with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The
Franklin Life Insurance Company; all included in the Form N-4 Registration
Statement Amendment No. 10 under the Investment Company Act of 1940
(Registration No. 811-07781), and also under the Securities Act of 1933, to be
filed by the Registrant, AGL Separate Account VA-1, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 31, 2002.


                                                     /s/  ERNST & YOUNG, LLP
                                                     -------------------------
Houston, Texas
December 30, 2002
###### Editorial Note on Part 141

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 141.104 Computation of duties.

In computing estimated duties, fractional parts of dollars and quantities shall be rounded off in accordance with § 159.3 of this chapter.

[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17447, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 99-64, 64 FR 43266, Aug. 10, 1999]