alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Gooding, Frederic

From: Beardsley, Michelle

Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 10:19 AM

To: Hensley, Jerry R (CHFS DPH DPHPS)

Cc: AgreementStateRegs Resource

Subject: Revised Kentucky State Regulation Status Sheet

Attachments: Kentucky revised SRS.docx

Good morning Jerry, please see the revised Kentucky State Regulation Status sheet attached. This was 

revised to add clarifying notes regarding Kentucky’s adoption of NRC regulations by reference for certain 

RATS IDs that were included in our review of the final regulations Kentucky submitted in February 

2019. These revisions were for clarification purposes only. Let me know if you note any errors or 

mischaracterizations. 

Thanks, 

Michelle 

Michelle Beardsley, Health Physicist 

State Regulation Review Coordinator 

State Agreement and Liaison Programs Branch

Division of Materials Safety, Security, State, and Tribal Programs 

Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

301‐415‐0275 

michelle.beardsley@nrc.gov
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Torrance JONES, a/k/a Tube, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-8026.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 19, 2002.

Decided May 29, 2002.

Torrance Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

*383Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Torrance Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. Jones,*Nos. CR-96-79-BO; CA-00-728-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2001). We deny Jones’ suggestion that this Court should stay its ruling in this case pending the outcome of certain state proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 5B

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 208-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2022 Page 1 of 2
Resolución 

Primero: Se dispone la nacionalización mediante expropiación forzosa y, en 

consecuencia, se adjudican a favor del Estado Cubano en pleno dominio todos las bienes 

y empresas ubicadas en el territorio nacional y los derechos y acciones emergentes de 

la explotación de los mismos, cualquiera que sean el título y modo de su disfrute, que 

pertenecen a las siguientes personas naturales o jurídicas: 

. . . . 

96. Ramón Rodriguez e Hijos, S. en C. 

 . . . . 

Segundo: La Administración y dirección de las empresas que por la presente 

Resolución se adjudican al Estado Cubano, se asigna a los organismos que actualmente 

tiene a su cargo dichas empresas, los que podrán designar para cada una de ellas los 

administradores que elijan sin perjuicio de las facultades de la Junta Central de 

Planificación. 

Tercero: Se autoriza expresamente a los organismos a que se refiere el Apartado 

anterior para que, mediante las oportunas Resoluciones, extiendan la racionalización 

que por esta Resolución se dispone a cuantos bienes, empresas, derechos y acciones 

resulten vinculados o afines a los nacionalizados, cualquiera que sea el modo, forma 

y título de la vinculación o afinidad. 

Cuarto: Se declaran como causas de utilidad pública y de interés social y nacional, 

así como de la necesidad de la expropiación, las expuestas en ellas. Por Cuantos de la 

presente Resolución. 

Quinto: De conformidad con lo dispuesto en el Artículo 7 de la Ley 890 de 1960, los 

medios y formas de pago que correspondan a las personas naturales o jurídicas 

afectadas por las expropiaciones que se disponen en esta Resolución, serán reguladas 

mediante una Ley. 

Y para su publicación en la GACETA OFICIAL de la República, en cumplimiento 

de lo expresamente ordenado por el Cmdte. Raúl Castro Rus, Vicepresidente de la 

Junta Central de Plantificación, se expide la presente certificación en La Habana, a 

cinco de julio de mil novecientos sesenta y uno. 

Regino G. Boti 

Ministro de Economia 

Secretario Técnieo 

Junta Central de Planification 

S -5365 

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 208-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2022 Page 2 of 2
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-98-57 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Tuesday, September 29, 1998)

NRC OFFICIAL TO HOLD NEWS CONFERENCE IN ATLANTA ON OCTOBER 5

TO BRIEF AREA REPORTERS ON AGENCY’S REGULATORY FUNCTIONS

Briefing To Include A Sample Power Reactor Fuel Assembly, Equipment Used In

Medicine and Commerce, And A Tour Of The NRC’s Atlanta Incident Response Center.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s top official in the southeast, Luis A. Reyes, will

brief Atlanta area reporters from 1 until 2 p.m. at the Sam Nunn Federal Center in

Atlanta on Monday, October 5 on regulatory safety functions performed across the

southeast by personnel from the agency’s Atlanta regional office.

The briefing will include an overview of safety functions carried out by NRC inspectors

in the southeast at 18 commercial power plant sites containing 33 nuclear power

reactors, four nuclear fuel fabrication plants and numerous users of licensed radioactive

material in medicine and commerce. Demonstration equipment from the NRC’s

Technical Training Center at Chattanooga will include a sample reactor fuel bundle, a

radiography camera used in commercial construction, a soil moisture density gauge

used by construction and highway personnel, and a technetium generator used to

produce the radioactive isotope for medical purposes.

Reyes, administrator of the NRC’s Region II office in Atlanta, will explain the program

under which states such as Georgia enter into agreements with the NRC which provide

for the state to license and inspect users of radioactive material used in commerce and

medicine. He will also take reporters through the agency’s incident response center

where inspectors monitor problem events at commercial reactors related to operating

events or natural disasters such as hurricanes and floods.

The news conference is being held as part of an NRC program to make senior officials

available to meet with news media representatives on a periodic basis to provide

briefings on subjects of current interest. Reyes will be available following the briefing to

answer questions from reporters who attend.

#
EDITORS & ASSIGNMENT EDITORS: Still and Video cameras will be allowed into the

NRC offices in the federal building at 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. for the news conference.

Please call (404) 562-4412 by Friday, October 2 if you or one of your reporters plans to

attend. Attendees should bring press credentials and will be assisted by NRC

personnel at the front entrance to the building.
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.3022 Retail packaging materials and containers.

(a) *Effect on tariff shift rule.* Packaging materials and containers in which a good is packaged for retail sale, if classified with the good for which preferential tariff treatment under the CTPA is claimed, will be disregarded in determining whether all non-originating materials used in the production of the good undergo the applicable change in tariff classification set out in General Note 34, HTSUS.

(b) *Effect on regional value content calculation.* If the good is subject to a regional value content requirement, the value of such packaging materials and containers will be taken into account as originating or non-originating materials, as the case may be, in calculating the regional value content of the good.

# Example 1.

Colombian Producer A of good C imports 100 non-originating blister packages to be used as retail packaging for good C. As provided in § 10.3016(a)(1), the value of the blister packages is their adjusted value, which in this case is $10. Good C has a regional value content requirement. The United States importer of good C decides to use the build-down method, RVC = ((AV − VNM)/AV) × 100 (*see* § 10.3015(b)), in determining whether good C satisfies the regional value content requirement. In applying this method, the non-originating blister packages are taken into account as non-originating. As such, their $10 adjusted value is included in the VNM, value of non-originating materials, of good C.

# Example 2.

Same facts as in Example 1, except that the blister packages are originating. In this case, the adjusted value of the originating blister packages would *not* be included as part of the VNM of good C under the build-down method. However, if the U.S. importer had used the build-up method, RVC = (VOM/AV) × 100 (*see* § 10.3015(c)), the adjusted value of the blister packaging would be included as part of the VOM, value of originating materials.
### §46b. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §203(16), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1727

Section, acts July 2, 1954, ch. 455, title I, 68 Stat. 402; July 12, 1960, Pub. L. 86–628, 74 Stat. 452; H. Res. No. 533, Eighty-eighth Congress, Oct. 2, 1963, enacted into permanent law by act Aug. 20, 1964, Pub. L. 88–454, §103, 78 Stat. 550; H. Res. No. 1029, Eighty-ninth Congress, Oct. 5, 1966; H. Res. No. 112, Ninetieth Congress, Mar. 8, 1967, enacted into permanent law by act May 29, 1967, Pub. L. 90–21, title I, 81 Stat. 38, related to stationery allowance for House Members.

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior acts:

Aug. 1, 1953, ch. 304, title I, 67 Stat. 324.

July 9, 1952, ch. 598, 66 Stat. 469.

Oct. 11, 1951, ch. 486, 65 Stat. 394.

Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, Ch. II, 64 Stat. 600.

June 22, 1949, ch. 235, 63 Stat. 221.

June 14, 1948, ch. 467, 62 Stat. 428.

July 17, 1947, ch. 262, 61 Stat. 366.

June 16, 1939, ch. 208, 53 Stat. 830.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

November 12, 2003

 

Via EDGAR

Securities and ExchangeCommission

Judiciary Plaza

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

 
| Re: |   | Certification  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|-----|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Eastern American Natural Gas Trust (the “Trust”) on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of theTrust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust at the dates andfor the period presented.

 

The above certification isfurnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separatedisclosure document.

 

 
|   | The Bank of  New York,                          |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   | Trustee for  Eastern American Natural Gas Trust |
|   |                                            |
|   |                                            |
|   | By:                                             |  /s/  Mauro Palladino |   |
|   |                                            | Vice  President |
|   |                                            | The Bank of  New York |
|        |                                                 |  |  |  |

 

----
AT&T LTE 9:19 AM 71% 

Team Doodie Project... Q 

From Notifications 

Bret Walley 

0 Admin • 1 min • 

n11•1 I an, 

00 

CP ra 

Tx 

.. • 

Fix your fucked up 

guns 

Sue shooters 

connection for selling 

you the barrels cause 

kkm called your 

bullshit 

es• 

tab 

• 

SCI 001406 CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-145 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
### Rule 206. Admission by Bar Examination Score Transfer

Applicants may apply for admission to the bar of the courts of this Commonwealth using a
Uniform Bar Examination (UBE) score earned in another jurisdiction provided that the applicant

meets the requirements below.

(a) Score Requirements.

1. The UBE score must meet or exceed that established by the Court as the
minimum passing score for applicants sitting for the bar exam at the time of the UBE

that resulted in the score the applicant [ files an ] seeks to transfer [ application for

admission under this rule ] ; and

2. No more than 30 months have passed from the first day of the UBE that resulted
in the score the applicant seeks to transfer.

***
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2002 Page 1 of 1
### §1322b. Aggregate limit on benefits guaranteed; criteria applicable

(a) Notwithstanding sections 1322 and 1322a of this title, no person shall receive from the corporation pursuant to a guarantee by the corporation of basic benefits with respect to a participant under all multiemployer and single employer plans an amount, or amounts, with an actuarial value which exceeds the actuarial value of a monthly benefit in the form of a life annuity commencing at age 65 equal to the amount determined under section 1322(b)(3)(B) of this title as of the date of the last plan termination.

(b) For purposes of this section—

(1) the receipt of benefits under a multiemployer plan receiving financial assistance from the corporation shall be considered the receipt of amounts from the corporation pursuant to a guarantee by the corporation of basic benefits except to the extent provided in regulations prescribed by the corporation, and

(2) the date on which a multiemployer plan, whether or not terminated, begins receiving financial assistance from the corporation shall be considered a date of plan termination.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title IV, §4022B, as added Pub. L. 96–364, title I, §102, Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1215.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Sept. 26, 1980, except as specifically provided, see section 1461(e) of this title.
§ 80.11 Project eligibility. ( a ) *Voluntary participation.* Eligible acquisition projects are those where the property owner participates voluntarily, and the recipient/subrecipient will not use its eminent domain authority to acquire the property for the open space purposes should negotiations fail.
( b ) *Acquisition of improved properties.* Eligible properties are those with at-risk structures on the property, including those that are damaged or destroyed due to an event. In some cases, undeveloped, at-risk land adjacent to an eligible property with existing structures may be eligible.
( c ) *Subdivision restrictions.* The land may not be subdivided prior to acquisition except for portions outside the identified hazard area, such as the Special Flood Hazard Area or any risk zone identified by FEMA.
( d ) *Subapplicant property interest.* To be eligible, the subapplicant must acquire or retain fee title (full property interest), except for encumbrances FEMA determines are compatible with open space uses, as part of the project implementation. A pass through of funds from an eligible entity to an ineligible entity must not occur.
( e ) *Hazardous materials.* Eligible properties include only those that are not contaminated with hazardous materials, except for incidental demolition and household hazardous waste.
( f ) *Open space restrictions.* Property acquired or from which a structure is removed must be dedicated to and maintained as open space in perpetuity consistent with this part.
[72 FR 61743, Oct. 31, 2007, as amended at 74 FR 47481, Sept. 16, 2009; 86 FR 50671, Sept. 10, 2021]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23569]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, November 12, 2004.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-23569 Filed 10-18-04; 11:51 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-111 July 12, 2000

NOTE TO EDITORS: DATE, LOCATION CHANGED FOR NRC CHAIRMAN

RICHARD A. MESERVE’S PRESS AVAILABILITY IN LAS VEGAS

Dr. Richard A. Meserve, Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, will be

available to speak to the news media at 4:00 p.m. Thursday at the Yucca Mountain Science Center,

4101 Meadows Lane, Las Vegas.

The previously announced date, time and location were Friday at 1:00 p.m. at the McCarran

International Airport. The change was made because of the unavailability of a previously scheduled

room at McCarran.

At the press availability, Dr. Meserve will answer questions from interested news media on

topics affecting Yucca Mountain and the NRC’s role and activities regarding the site.

###
§ 143.37 Retention of records. ( a ) *Record maintenance requirements.* All records received or generated by a broker or importer must be maintained in accordance with part 163 of this chapter.
( b ) *Termination of broker's responsibility.* If the broker is discharged by the importer, he shall retain the documentation for those deliveries, entries or entry summaries filed by him prior to such discharge. Documentation in possession of a broker at the time of permanent termination of the brokerage business shall be accounted for pursuant to § 111.30(e) of this chapter.
[T.D. 90-92, 55 FR 49886, Dec. 3, 1990, as amended by T.D. 98-56, 63 FR 32945, June 16, 1998]
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04360A201
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SIGHT
RESOURCE CORPORATION'S BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AS REPORTED ON FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,359
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,708
<ALLOWANCES>                                       483
<INVENTORY>                                      4,365
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,538
<PP&E>                                          10,163
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,656
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,865
<SALES>                                         13,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,580
<CGS>                                            4,752
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     22
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 13
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        13
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
#### § 111.56 Review of report on the investigation of complaints.

The processing Center will review the report on the investigation of complaints, or if there is no report on the investigation of complaints, other documentary evidence, to determine if there is sufficient basis to recommend that charges be preferred against the broker. The processing Center will then submit the recommendation with supporting reasons to the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, for final determination together with a proposed statement of charges when recommending that charges be preferred.

[CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63319, Oct. 18, 2022]
### §60j–3. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–276, §101(e), Oct. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 1189

Section, Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §109, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 773; Pub. L. 96–304, title I, §107(c), July 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 890, provided for merit compensation for employees rated as outstanding and exceptional by Secretary of Senate and Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper, respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Section 101 of S. 2939, 97th Congress, 2d Session, as reported Sept. 22, 1982, and incorporated by reference in section 101(e) of Pub. L. 97–276, to be effective as if enacted into law, provided that the repeal is effective Oct. 1, 1982.

#### Reports Covering Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 1982

Section 101 of S. 2939, 97th Congress, 2d Session, as reported Sept. 22, 1982, and incorporated by reference in section 101(e) of Pub. L. 97–276, to be effective as if enacted into law, provided in part that the reports required by subsec. (e) of this section with respect to the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1982, be filed notwithstanding the repeal. Subsec. (e) of this section had required that within thirty days following the end of each fiscal year, the Secretary of the Senate and the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper file reports with the Senate Committee on Appropriations detailing the use and implementation of the authority contained in this section and that such reports include the names of all employees receiving merit compensation under authority of this section at the end of the fiscal year, the positions occupied by them and the date when each such employee first began to receive merit compensation.
### §441h. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 441h was editorially reclassified as section 30124 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.