alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-16 February 18, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC SENDS AUGMENTED INSPECTION TEAM TO INDIAN POINT 2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is dispatching an augmented inspection team to follow

up on the steam generator tube leak at the Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant that led to an “Alert”

declaration Tuesday night.

Consolidated Edison Company of New York workers manually shut down the reactor in

Buchanan, N.Y., at 7:29 p.m. Tuesday following indications of a steam generator tube leak in one of

the plant’s four steam generators. The steam generators are components that transfer heat from the

reactor systems to the power-generating portion of a nuclear power plant. Plant safety systems

performed as designed during the shutdown.

The NRC’s multi-disciplinary team will focus principally on Consolidated Edison’s response

to the steam generator tube leak. In addition, it will gather information regarding the utility’s actions

to meet steam generator inspection and maintenance commitments. Once the team has completed its

review, its findings will be reported at an exit meeting which will be open to the public.

The cause and nature of the steam generator tube failure will be the subject of a separate NRC

review.

NRC closely monitored the event from Tuesday night through the exit from the Alert

declaration at 6:50 p.m. on Wednesday. The agency’s inspectors at the site followed events, and safety

specialists monitored conditions from incident response centers in the Philadelphia-area Region I

Office and NRC Headquarters in Rockville, Md., throughout the Alert period.

#
§ 113.43 Extension of time period. ( a ) *Application received within time period.* If a document referred to in § 113.42 is not produced within 120 days from the date of the transaction in connection with which the bond was given, the port director or an appropriate CBP officer, in his or her discretion, and upon written application of the importer, may extend the period for one further period not to exceed 60 days.
( b ) *Late application.* No application for the extension of the period of any bond given to assure the production of a missing document will be allowed by the port director if the application is received later than 60 days after the expiration of the period of the bond, and any extension will not be allowed by the port director for a period of more than 60 days from the date of expiration of the period.
( c ) *Acceptance of a free-entry or reduced-duty document prior to liquidation.* When a bond is given for the production of any free-entry or reduced-duty document and a satisfactory document is produced prior to liquidation of the entry or within the period during which a valid reliquidation may be completed, provided the failure to file was not due to willful negligence or fraudulent intent, it will be accepted as satisfying the requirement that it be filed in connection with the entry, and the bond charge for its production will be cancelled.
[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984, as amended by T.D. 85-167, 50 FR 40363, Oct. 3, 1985; CBP Dec. 15-15, 80 FR 70167, Nov. 13, 2015]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-101 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Tuesday, July 1, 1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A meeting of a subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission's Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)

scheduled for July 21-22 in Rockville, Maryland, has been

postponed due to the unavailability of documents.

Notice of the meeting of the Subcommittee on Thermal

Hydraulic Phenomena had been published in the June 23 edition of

the Federal Register. Rescheduling of the meeting will be

announced in a future Federal Register notice.

#
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6031

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

TRINI MCDANIEL, a/k/a John Paul Morris, a/k/a Brother-inLaw, a/k/a Bro-Law, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief 

District Judge. (3:96-cr-00041-JRS-7) 

Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 18, 2009 

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Trini McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Trini McDaniel appeals a district court order denying 

his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) 

(2006). The district court found McDaniel was not eligible for 

a reduction because he was responsible for more than 4.5 

kilograms of crack cocaine. We affirm. 

We find the district did not abuse its discretion 

denying McDaniel’s motion for a sentence reduction. United 

States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating 

standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
§ 12.124 Time limitations and extensions. ( a ) *Time limitations.* The importer of a shipment of a covered commodity which has been detained under § 12.122 must bring the shipment into compliance with TSCA or export the shipment from the customs territory of the United States within 90 days after notice of detention or 30 days of demand for redelivery, whichever comes first.
( b ) *Time extensions.* The port director, upon notification by the Administrator, may grant an extension of not more than 30 days if, due to delays caused by the Environmental Protection Agency or the CBP: ( 1 ) The importer is unable, for good cause shown, to bring a shipment into compliance with the Act within the required time period; or
( 2 ) The importer is unable to export the shipment from the customs territory of the United States within the required time period.
[T.D. 83-158, 48 FR 34739, Aug. 1, 1983, as amended by CBP Dec. 16-28, 81 FR 94986, Dec. 27, 2016]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-265

December 22, 1999

LICENSING BOARD TO HEAR ORAL ARGUMENTS

ON SHEARON HARRIS SPENT FUEL POOLS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will hear oral

arguments on January 21 regarding a December 1998 request by Carolina Power & Light, owner

of the Shearon Harris plant, that the NRC amend its operating license to place two unused spent

fuel pools in service. The plant is located near Raleigh, North Carolina.

The Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, petitioned to intervene.

A three-member NRC Licensing Board granted the Commissioners’ petition and is in the process

of conducting a hearing on the merits of the case.

The Atomic Safety & Licensing Board is composed of independent judges who conduct

formal hearings on licensing actions involving facilities that produce or use nuclear materials.

Individuals whose interests may be affected by such licensing actions may participate in hearings

before the Licensing Board.

At the hearing, the Licensing Board will hear oral arguments from Carolina Power &

Light, the Orange County Board of Commissioners, and the NRC staff, as to whether there are

disputed issues of fact or law that require resolution in an evidentiary hearing.

Hearings were also held earlier this month in Raleigh and Chapel Hill, North Carolina,

where members of the public who are not parties to the proceeding made oral limited appearance

statements describing their concerns with the utility’s request.

This hearing was previously scheduled for January 4.

The hearing will begin at 9:30 a.m. in Room T-3B45 of the agency’s Two White Flint

North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike in Rockville, Maryland, and will be open for public

observation.

###
Exhibit 2

(Total Compensation and Expenses Requested)

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1153-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2022 Page 1 of 2
Professional Firm Category Hours Fees Expenses Total Billed

Stumphauzer Foslid Sloman Ross &

Kolaya, PLLC Attorneys 1,021.2 $334,232.50 $10,108.51 $344,341.01

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick &

Raspanti, LLP Attorneys 1,294.9 $442,062.00 $58,296.57 $500,358.57

Development Specialists, Inc. Operations Consultant 1,471.1 $623,999.75 $32,133.73 $656,133.48

Lawgical Insight, LLC eDiscovery Specialist 47.3 $12,606.25 $0.00 $12,606.25

HD Investigative Group, LLC Investigations Firm 65.0 $14,625.00 $0.00 $14,625.00

6,557.8 $1,427,525.50 $100,538.81 $1,528,064.31

Total Compensation and Expenses Requested

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1153-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2022 Page 2 of 2
|   | 1) | such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended                June                30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | the                  information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of                  Ener1,                  Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, fairly presents, in                  all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                  of                  Ener1, Inc. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                                                                                                      |                                 |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|         |                                                                                                                                                      |
|    |                                                                                                                                                 |                            |
|         |                                                                                                                                                 | /s/ Ronald              Stewart |
|         |                                                                                                                                                           |
|         | Ronald                StewartChief                Executive Officer(Principal                Executive Officer andDuly                Authorized Officer) |
24 www.soldiersmagazine.com

Afghanistan

During Operation Viper, a soldier from the 82nd

Airborne Division’s Company B, 2nd Battalion,

504th Infantry Regiment, climbs into a small

hole to search for suspected Taliban and weapon caches at a compound in Afghanistan’s Bahgram Valley.

— Photo by SPC Preston Cheeks

24 www.soldiersmagazine.com

The Army in Action Worldwide

On Point
Soldiers•June2003 25
26 www.soldiersmagazine.com

On Point

Philippines:

A U.S. Army special forces soldier

conducts security-assistance

training for members of the Philippines armed forces in support of

Operation Enduring Freedom. The

training is designed to assist and

advise Philippine forces in order to

refine their counter-terrorism capabilities.

— Photo by PH1 Edward G. Martens,

USN

;
Soldiers•June2003 27

Kosovo

Soldiers from the 1st Inf. Div.’s 2nd Battalion, 63rd Armor,

patrol the border between Kosovo and Macedonia in support of Operation Joint Guardian II.

— Photo by SGT April Johnson

Korea

During Exercise Foal

Eagle 2nd Infantry Division soldiers inside an

M1A1 Abrams tank

scan the area for “enemy” forces during a

tank battle scenario at

Camp Red Cloud’s Twin

Bridges training area.

— Photo by Sgt. Efren

Lopez, USAF

;

;

;
###### Editorial Note on Part 121

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 121 appear at 72 FR 50039 and 50040, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 121.803 Are formal size determinations binding on parties?

Size determinations by authorized SBA officials are formal actions, based upon a specific patent application pursuant to the rules of the Patent and Trademark Office, Department of Commerce, and are binding upon the parties. Other SBA opinions provided to patent applicants or others are only advisory, and are not binding or appealable.
§ 206.39 Notification. ( a ) The Governor will be promptly notified by the Administrator or his/her designee of a declaration by the President that an emergency or a major disaster exists. FEMA also will notify other Federal agencies and other interested parties.
( b ) The Governor will be promptly notified by the Administrator or his/her designee of a determination that the Governor's request does not justify the use of the authorities of the Stafford Act.
( c ) Following a major disaster or emergency declaration, the Regional Administrator or the Assistant Administrator for the Disaster Assistance Directorate will promptly notify the Governor of the designations of assistance and areas eligible for such assistance.
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.883 Eligible administrative costs for 504 loans. The following administrative costs are not part of Project costs, but may be paid with the proceeds of the 504 loan and the Debenture (see § 120.971): ( a ) SBA guarantee fee;
( b ) Funding fee (to cover the cost of a public issuance of securities and the Trustee);
( c ) CDC processing fee;
( d ) Borrower's out-of-pocket costs associated with 504 loan and Debenture closing other than legal fees (for example, certifications and the copying costs associated with them, overnight delivery, postage, and messenger services) but not to include fees and costs described in § 120.882;
( e ) CDC Closing Fee (see § 120.971(a)(2)) up to a maximum of $10,000; and
( f ) Underwriters' fee.
[64 FR 2118, Jan. 13, 1999, as amended at 68 FR 57987, Oct. 7, 2003; 88 FR 70586, Oct. 12, 2023]
§ 115.29 Plan review. ( a ) A manufacturer or owner who wants containers to be approved by design type must submit the plans and specifications for the container to the Certifying Authority.
( b ) The Certifying Authority examining the plans and specifications submitted in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section shall: ( 1 ) Approve the plans and specifications in accordance with the requirements of § 115.30 and arrange to inspect a container in accordance with § 115.31; or
( 2 ) Advise the applicant of any necessary changes to be made for compliance with the requirements of § 115.30.
( c ) If changes in the design of the container are made during production but after approval of the plans and specifications by the Certifying Authority and furnish it with “as-built” drawings of the container so that the plans can be reviewed and one or more containers inspected during the production stage to confirm that they continue to comply with the requirements of § 115.30.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of
Jefferson Savings Bancorp, Inc. at and for the three months ended
March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.  Dollar amounts (other than per share
data) is in thousands.

<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                     7,252
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     10,630
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           10,470
<TRADING-ASSETS>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                231,978
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       0
<LOANS>                                    978,103
<ALLOWANCE>                                7,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1,296,929
<DEPOSITS>                                 1,077,949
<SHORT-TERM>                               95,821
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        16,859
<LONG-TERM>                                0
<COMMON>                                   50
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                 106,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             1,296,929
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            19,039
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          3,183
<INTEREST-OTHER>                           490
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           22,712
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         12,407
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         13,790
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      8,922
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              306
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                         0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            5,056
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            4,243
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               2,621
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                             3.14
<LOANS-NON>                                2,270
<LOANS-PAST>                               0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                           178
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                            1,346
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           6,529
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              7
<RECOVERIES>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          7,983
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       7,983
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    2,874
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23515]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--American Association of Motor Vehicle 
Administrators

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Association of 
Motor Vehicle Administrators (``AAMVA'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: American 
Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators, Arlington, VA. The nature 
and scope of AAMVA's standards development activities are: common 
names, abbreviations, definitions, uses, sources, synonyms and 
representations of data elements transmitted and communicated by state 
and local traffic records systems. AAMVA is also responsible for 
specifications of contents and layouts for machine readable 
technologies such as smart cards, magnetic strips, 1D bar codes, 2D bar 
codes, in particular PDF 417 on state motor vehicle administration 
documentation such as titles, registrations, identification cards and 
driver licenses.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23515 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 321.4 Achieving production readiness. ( a ) In order to achieve a capability for maximum production of “urgent” items during the initial phase of war, the following readiness measures shall be taken where advisable for facilities producing such items: ( 1 ) Establishment of emergency production schedules.
( 2 ) Development of a production capability which would function under widespread disruption and damage imposed by enemy attack, including, where necessary: ( i ) Maintenance of an increased inventory of finished components and related production supplies at assembly plants, or arrangements for alternative supply lines where increased inventories are not feasible.
( ii ) A capability to carry on urgent production without dependence on additional personnel, external sources of power, fuel, and water, or on long-distance communications; with spare replacements for highly vulnerable or unreliable parts of production equipment.
( iii ) Protection of production facilities from enemy sabotage through adequate physical security measures.
( iv ) Protection of personnel from widespread radiological fallout through provisions for decontamination and shelter.
### §3274. Rule of construction regarding postsecondary transition and concurrent enrollment activities

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to prohibit or discourage the use of funds provided under this subchapter for adult education and literacy activities that help eligible individuals transition to postsecondary education and training or employment, or for concurrent enrollment activities.

(Pub. L. 113–128, title II, §205, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1612.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.308 Records retention. ( a ) *Importer.* The importer of record shall retain the exporter's certificate of origin required by § 10.307(d) for a period of 5 years and it must be made available upon request by the appropriate Customs official.
( b ) *Exporter.* Any person who exports, or who knowlingly causes to be exported, any merchandise to Canada shall make, keep, and render for examination and inspection, such records (including certifications of origin or copies thereof), which pertain to such exportation for a period of 5 years from the date of exportation. In the event that the appropriate Customs official requests submission of the records, they shall be submitted directly to the requesting official.