Ony x Environmenta l Service s 

Sauget , I L 

Performanc e Tes t Result s fo r th e 

Fixe d Heart h an d Rotar y Kil n 

Incinerator s - Ma y 200 4 ^ 

ENSR Corporation 

July 2004 

Document Number 10002-011-400 
\lNTERAIAnONAL 

CONTENTS 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 

1.1 Program Summary 1-1 

2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS . 2-1 

2.1 Introduction 2-1 

2.2 Stack Emission Results for PCDDs/PCDFs 2-1 

2.3 Stack Emission results for Target Metals 2-1 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 3-1 

3.1 Sampling Procedures 3-1 

3.1.1 Velocity, Moisture and Fixed Gas Determinations 3-1 

3.1.2 PCDD/PCDF Sampling 3-1 

3.1.3 Metals Sampling 3-1 

3.2 Analytical Procedures 3-1 

3.2.1 PCDD/PCDF Analyses 3-1 

3.2.2 Metals Analyses 3-2 

3.3 Process Operating Conditions 3-2 

4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE 4-1 

4.1 Introduction 4-1 

4.1.1 Pre-Sampling Activities 4-1 

4.1.2 Equipment Calibration 4-1 

4.1.3 Glassware Preparation 4-2 

4.2 Chain of Custody 4-3 

4.3 Analytical QA/QC 4-3 

4.3.1 Analysis for PCDDs/PCDFs 4-3 

4.3.2 Analysis for Metals 4-3 

J:\Air_Tox\ProjectFiles\Onyx\Onyx2004\May i July, 2004 

2004\0504 Final Report.doc 
INTERNATIONAL 

LIST OF TABLES 

Table 2-1 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 2 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results - 2-2 

Table 2-2 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 2 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results - 2-3 

Table 2-3 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 2 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results - 2^1 

Table 2-4 ONYX Rotary Kiln Unit 2 Mercury Emission Results 2-5 

Table 2-5 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 4 Mercury Emission Results 2-6 

J:\Air_Tox\ProjectHles\Onyx\Onyx2004\May ii July. 2004 

2004\0504 Final Report.doc 
lAirERMAr/ON/IL. 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 

1.1 Program Summary 

ENS R International was retained by Onyx Environmental Services, Sauget, Illinois to conduct 

stack gas emission sampling during the week of May 3, 2004 on two incinerators at the facility. 

The purpose of this Performance Test was to validate the performance level of the incinerator against 

the requirements in 40 CF R Part 63, Subpart EEE. To this end, the specific objectives of this 

Performance Test were to: 

• Demonstrate that the mercury, dioxins and furans emissions from the Fixed Hearth and 

mercury emissions from the Rotary Kiln meet the HWC MACT emission limits while treating 

hazardous waste. 

• Collect monitoring data, to be used in conjunction with previous test data, in order to set 

operating limits on key incinerator system parameters that will ensure that the incinerator 

operates within the HWC MACT emission limits while treating hazardous waste. 

The Performance Test included feeding certain types of wastes and materials into each incinerator, 

sampling and analyzing these feedstreams, monitoring certain process parameters while conducting 

emissions testing. 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2004\May 

2004\0504 Final Report.doc 

1-1 July, 2004 
EreJI . 

| INTERNATIONAL 

2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

2.1 Introduction 

This section summarizes the test program results. Appendix A presents copies of ENSR's field data 

sheets. Emission data is summarized in this section and feed and process operating data are included 

in Appendix B. 

2.2 Stack Emission Results for PCDDs/PCDFs 

Stack emissions from Unit 2 were tested for PCDDs/PCDFs via Method 0023A. This required 

separate analysis of the front-half and back-half sample train fractions. Program samples were 

submitted to Alta Analytical Laboratories in El Dorado Hills, C A for all analysis of all target parameters. 

The second run on Unit 2 was voided due to a CO spike and a fourth sampling run was conducted. 

The PCDD/PCDF emissions for Unit 2 (average emissions for runs 1, 3 and 4 were 0.054 ng/m3@ 7% 

02 ) are below the HWC MACT emission standard of 0.4 ng/m3 @ 7% 02 . A summary of the 

PCDD/PCDF emission results on a TEQ basis for Unit 2 are included in Tables 2-1. 

2.3 Stack Emission results for Target Metals 

Stack emissions from both Unit 2 and Unit 4 were tested for metals in accordance with Method 29. 

During the second sampling run on Unit 4, the unit experienced an AWFCO. ENSR sampled through 

duration of the AWFCO. As a result of sampling while the unit was not burning waste, the sampling 

run was voided and a fourth sampling run was conducted. The second run on Unit 2 was voided due 

to a CO spike and a fourth sampling run was conducted. A summary of the mercury emissions for Unit 

2 and Unit 4 are included in tables 2-3 and 2-4. Mercury results indicate that: 

• The mercury emissions for Unit 2 (average for runs 1, 3 and 4 were 13.5 pg/m3 @ 7% 02 ) were 

below the new HWC MACT emission standard of 130 pg/m3 @ 7% 02 ; 

• The mercury emissions for Unit 4 (average for runs 1, 3 and 4 were 17 .9 pg/m3 @ 7% 02 ) were 

below the new HWC MACT emission standard of 130 pg/m3 @ 7% 02 . 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2004\May 

2004\0504 Final Reportdoc 

2-1 July, 2004 
E M S 

/A/TERNA TIONAL 

Table 2-1 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 2 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results -

T OTA L TEQ's 

Run No. Run 1 Run 3 Run 4 

Date. 05-May-04 06-May-04 06-May-04 

Start Time 09:35 10:10 14:15 

Stop Time 12:38 13:30 17:23 

Units 

Sample Volume dscf 125.482 126.931 128.302 

Sample Volume m

3 3.55 3.59 3.63 

Moisture Content % v/v 43.0 44.7 43.4 

02 Concentration % v/v (dry) 10.40 10.50 10.50 

C 02 Concentration % v/v (dry) 4.50 4.20 4.30 

Isokinetics % 102 105 102 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,747 5,564 5,776 

PCDD / PCDF P9 ng/m3 

pg ng/m3 

pg ng/m3 

Parameters TEF (a) TEQ TEQ TEQ 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 1.00 5.16 1.5E-03 (6.47) O.OE+00 5.33 1.5E-03 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.50 34.2 4.8E-03 33.5 4.7E-03 20.3 2.8E-03 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.10 31.7 8.9E-04 27.8 7.7E-04 19.7 5.4E-04 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.10 87.2 2.5E-03 62.5 1.7E-03 44.3 1.2E-03 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.10 46.4 1.3E-03 56.6 1.6E-03 35.7 9.8E-04 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.01 437.6 1.2E-03 287 8.0E-04 166.0 4.6E-04 

OCDD 0.001 368.6 1.0E-04 222.2 6.2E-05 135.1 3.7E-05 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.10 50.0 1.4E-03 64.3 1.8E-03 45.6 1.3E-03 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.05 72.7 1.OE-03 68.3 9.5E-04 41.8 5.8E-04 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.50 153.0 2.2E-02 166.0 2.3E-02 88.0 1.2E-02 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.10 116.0 3.3E-03 85.8 2.4E-03 48.2 1.3E-03 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.10 85.5 2.4E-03 63.3 1.8E-03 36.4 1.OE-03 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.10 226.0 6.4E-03 151.0 4.2E-03 71.1 2.0E-03 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.10 52.1 1.5E-03 32.0 8.9E-04 18.5 5.1 E-04 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.01 220.0 6.2E-04 131.0 3.6E-04 64.4 1.8E-04 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.01 69.6 2.0E-04 21.6 6.0E-05 (14.4) 0.0E+00 

OCDF 0.001 120.6 3.4E-05 45.9 1.3E-05 31.4 8.6E-06 

TOTAL TEQs (ng/m3) 0.051 0.045 0.026 

TOTAL TEQs (ng/m3 @ 7 % 02 ) = 0.067 0.060 0.035 

TOTAL TEQs (g/s) = 1.4E-10 1.2E-10 7.2E-11 

(a) U.S.EPA (1989) Toxic Equivalency Factor 

Note: "Non-detect" values are shown in parentheses and treated as zero in the calculation 

of concentration on a TEQ basis. 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2004\May 

2004\0504 Final Reportdoc 

2-2 July, 2004 
ENSR . 

Table 2-2 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 2 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results -

Front Half Fraction Totals 

Run No. Run 1 Run 3 Run 4 

Date 05-May-O4 06-May-04 06-Mav-04 

Start Time 09:35 10:10 14:15 

Stop Time 12:38 13:30 17:23 

Sample Volume 

uniis 

dscf 125.482 126.931 128.302 

Sample Volume m

3 3.55 3.59 3.63 

Moisture Content % v/v 43.0 44.7 43.4 

02 Concentration % v/v (dry) 10.40 10.50 10.50 

C 02 Concentration % v/v (dry) 4.50 4.20 4.30 

Isokinetics % 102 105 102 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,747 5,564 5,776 

PCDD/PCDF 

Parameters TEF (a) 

P9 ng/m3 

TEQ 

pg ng/m3 

TEQ 

pg ng/m3 

TEQ 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 1.00 (2.28) O.0E+O0 (1.89) 0.0E+00 (3.21) O.OE+00 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.50 (3.85) O.0E+O0 (5.07) 0.0E+00 (5.06) O.OE+00 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.10 ..(2.74). O.OE+00 (4.92) O.OE+OO (3.61) O.OE+00 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.10 ..(2,53). 0.0E+00 (4.55) O.OE+00 (3.33) O.OE+00 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.10 (2.59) 0.0E+00 (4.65) O.OE+00 (3.40) O.OE+00 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.01 4.63 1.3E-05 3.82 1.1 E-05 (8.38) O.OE+00 

OCDD 0.001 19.6 5.5E-06 16.2 4.5E-06 21.1 5.8E-06 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.10 (3.11) 0.0E+00 (3.67) O.OE+OO 6.46 1.8E-04 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.05 (3.75) 0.0E+00 (4.07) O.OE+OO (2.85) O.OE+00 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.50 (3.46) 0.0E+00 (3.75) O.OE+OO {2.62) O.OE+00 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.10 .(2,77). O.OE+00 (2.65) O.OE+00 (341) O.OE+00 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.10 .(2- 5

9). O.OE+00 (2.39) O.OE+00 (3.08) O.OE+00 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.10 (2.98) 0.0E+00 (2.85) O.OE+00 (1.74) O.OE+00 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.10 _.(?.-2TL 0.0E+00 (3.13). O.OE+00 (1.90) O.OE+00 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.01 (

4

.-73). O.OE+00 (6.55) O.OE+00 7.34 2.0E-05 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.01 .&P7.L 0.0E+00 (2.78) O.OE+00 (2.71) O.OE+OO 

OCDF 0.001 (18.8) 0.0E+00 15.3 4.3E-06 16.3 4.5E-06 

TOTAL TEQs (ng/m3) = 1.9E-05 1.9E-05 2.1 E-04 

TOTAL TEQs (ng/m3 @ 7 % 02 ) 2.4E-05 2.6E-05 2.8E-04 

TOTAL TEQs (g/s) 5.0E-14 5.1 E-14 5.7E-13 

(a) U.S.EPA (1989) Toxic Equivalency Factor 

Note: "Non-detect" values are shown in parentheses and treated as zero in the calculation 

of concentration on a TEQ basis. 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\0nyx\0nyx 2004\May 

20O4\0504 Final Report doc 

2-3 July, 2004 
BUSK . 

/AITERUAT/OAIAL 

Table 2-3 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 2 PCDD/PCDF Emission ResultsBack Half Fraction Totals 

Run No. 

Date 

Run 1 

05-May-04 

flQ.OC 

Run 3 

06-May-04 

-irvm 

Run 4 

06-May-04 

14-1^ 

Start Time 

Stop Time 

uy.oo 

12:38 

IU. 1 u 

13:30 17:23 

Units 

Sample Volume dscf 125.482 126.931 128.302 

Sample Volume m

3 3.55 3.59 3.63 

Moisture Content % v/v 43.0 44.7 43.4 

0 2 Concentration % v/v (dry) 10.40 10.50 10.50 

C 0 2 Concentration % v/v (dry) 4.50 4.20 4.30 

Isokinetics % 102 105 102 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,747 5,564 5,776 

PCDD/PCDF 

Parameters TEF (a) 

pg ng/m3 

TEQ 

pg ng/m3 

TEQ 

pg ng/m3 

TEQ 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 1.00 5.16 1.5E-03 (4.58) O.OE+00 5.33 1.5E-03 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.50 34.2 4.8E-03 33.5 4.7E-03 20.3 2.8E-03 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.10 31.7 8.9E-04 27.8 7.7E-04 19.7 5.4E-04 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.10 87.2 2.5E-03 62.5 1.7E-03 44.3 1.2E-03 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.10 46.4 1.3E-03 56.6 1.6E-03 35.7 9.8E-04 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.01 433 1.2E-03 283 7.9E-04 166 4.6E-04 

OCDD 0.001 349 9.8E-05 206 5.7E-05 114 3.1 E-05 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.10 50.0 1.4E-03 64.3 1.8E-03 39.1 1.1 E-03 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.05 72.7 1.OE-03 68.3 9.5E-04 41.8 5.8E-04 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.50 153 2.2E-02 166 2.3E-02 88.0 1.2E-02 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.10 116 3.3E-03 85.8 2.4E-03 48.2 1.3E-03 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.10 85.5 2.4E-03 63.3 1.8E-03 36.4 1 .OE-03 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.10 226 6.4E-03 151 4.2E-03 71.1 2.0E-03 

i,2j,7,8\9^HxCDF 0.10 52.1 1.5E-03 32.0 8.9E-04 18.5 5.1 E-04 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.01 220 6.2E-04 131 3.6E-04 57.1 1.6E-04 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.01 69.6 2.0E-04 21.6 6.0E-05 (11,7).. O.OE+00 

OCDF 

TOTAI TF.Os inolm 

0.001 

n 

120^ 3.4E-05 

0.051 

30.6 8.5E-06 

0.045 

15.1 4.2E-06 

0.026 

TOTAL TEQs (ng/m3 @ 7 % 02 ) = 

TOTAL TEQs (g/s) 

0.067 

1.4E-10 

0.060 

1.2E-10 

0.035 

7.1 E-11 

(a) U.S.EPA (1989) Toxic Equivalency Factor 

Note: "Non-detect" values are shown in parentheses and treated as zero in the calculation 

of concentration on a TEQ basis. 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\0nyx\Onyx 20D4\May 

2004\0504 Final Reportdoc 

2-4 July. 2004 
ENkR. 

INTERNA T/OMAL 

Table 2-4 ONYX Roia^4€Sn Unit 2 Mercury Emission Results 

Run No. Run 1 Run 3 Run 4 

Date 05-May-04 06-May-04 06-May-04 

Start Time Units 9:35 10:10 14:15 

Stop Time 12:11 13:00 16:53 AVGS 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.55 29.55 29.52 

Volume Metered dcf 80.781 90.379 92.516 87.892 

Sample Volume dscf 74.587 82.730 83.260 80.192 

Moisture % v/v 44.5 45.6 44.4 44.8 

Oz at Stack %dry 10.40 10.50 10.50 10.47 

Avg. Stack Temp. 

op 364 370 371 368 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,112 5,565 5,709 5,462 

Isokinetics % 100 102 100 101 

Mercurv (He) — VM 

Quantity Collected ug 25.3 23.8 19.6 22.9 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 15.8 13.5 11.1 13.5 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 2.29E-04 2.12E-04 1.78E-04 2.06E-04 

g/sec 2.89E-05 2.67E-05 2.24E-05 2.60E-05 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2004\May 

2004\0504 Final Reportdoc 

2-5 July. 2004 
EPKB. 

INTERNA TIONAL 

Table 2-5 0N¥X-FixW1Hearth Incinerator Unit 4 Mercury Emission Results 

Run No. Run 1 Run 3 Run 4 

Date 5/4/2004 5/4/2004 5/4/2004 

Start Time Units 8:45 12:32 14:48 

Stop Time 10:46 14:33 16:49 AVGS 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.45 29.45 29.45 

Volume Metered dcf 81.633 79.633 78.466 79.911 

Sample Volume dscf 78.146 74.416 73.498 75.353 

Moisture % v/v 42.0 41.7 42.9 42.2 

O z at Stack %dry 12.90 12.80 12.80 12.83 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 384 392 393 390 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 17,708 17,788 17,828 17,775 

Isokinetics % 106 100 99 102 

Mercury (He) — VM 

Quantity Collected M9 8.4 22.2 35.5 22.1 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 Mg/m3 6.6 18.0 29.1 17.9 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 2.53E-04 7.03 E-04 1.14E-03 6.98E-04 

g/sec 3.19E-05 8.86E-05 1.43E-04 8.80E-05 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2004\May 

2004\0504 Final Report.doc 

2-6 July, 2004 
3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 

3.1 Sampling Procedures 

Several different sampling and monitoring techniques were used to provide the required data to meet 

the goals of this test program. Three runs were conducted on Unit 2 and Unit 4 at one operating 

condition established by Onyx. The sampling activities described below were conducted during all 

runs. All field activities were documented in accordance with EPA accepted procedures and copies of 

all field notes and data sheets are included in Appendix A of this report 

3.1.1 Velocity, Moisture and Fixed Gas Determinations 

Gas stream velocity and temperature were determined in conjunction with each manual sampling 

method. A type "S" pitot tube connected to an inclined water manometer was used to determine 

velocity head of the flue gas at each duct traverse point as specified in EPA Reference Method 2. The 

temperature profile of the flue gas at each traverse point was obtained by taking readings with a 

thermocouple and pyrometer concurrent with the velocity head measurements. Moisture content was 

determined as specified in EPA Method 4. Samples for the determination of the fixed gas composition 

were collected using an integrated bag technique as detailed in EPA Reference Method 3. 

3.1.2 PCDD/PCDF Sampling 

Sampling for dioxins and furans was completed in accordance with EPA Method 23A (40 CFR 60, 

Appendix A). Three isokinetic sampling runs were conducted on Unit 2. Each sampling run was 3 

hours in duration covering 12 sampling points at 15 minutes per point 

3.1.3 Metals Sampling 

A modified EPA Multiple Metals Train (EPA Method 29,40 CFR 60 Appendix A) was utilized during the 

testing program for the collection of mercury. The sampling train consisted of a glass button hook 

nozzle, a glass liner, a filter housing and a series of four glass impingers that contained 250 ml of 

acidified potassium permanganate. Run times were 120 minutes in duration and involved isokinetic 

sampling at 12 sampling points (6 points per traverse, 10 minutes per point). 

J:\Air_Tox\Project FBes\Onyx\Onyx 2004\May 

2004\0504 Final Report.doc 

3-1 July, 2004 
E M S 

\/A/r£RNATIOMAL 

3.2 Analytical Procedures 

3.2.1 PCDD/PCDF Analyses 

PCDD/PCDF analyses were performed by Alta Analytical Laboratory, Inc. in El Dorado Hills, CA. 

Sample fractions were extracted, concentrated and analyzed by EPA Method 8290 (High Resolution 

Gas Chromatograph / High Resolution Mass Spectrophotometer (HRGC/HRMS)). The train fractions 

recovered for analysis of PCDDs/PCDFs include the front half rinse, the particulate filter, the back half 

rinse and the XAD resin trap. The analytical results for each sample fraction were combined into a 

single analytical result for each run. 

3.2.2 Metals Analyses 

Results for mercury from the Method 0060 sampling trains were reported by Severn Trent Laboratories 

in West Sacramento, CA. In addition, ENSR performed blank-correction on the data for field blank 

reagent contamination to the maximum extent allowed by Method 0060/29. Mercury was analyzed via 

Method 7470A by Graphite Fumace/Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. 

3.3 Process Operating Conditions 

Throughout the field program, detailed process information was collected continuously by the facility's 

process control computers and data acquisition system (DAS). Process data including minimum, 

maximum and average values for key process variables recorded during each test condition. In 

general, target-operating conditions specified in the trial bum plan were achieved. 

J:\Air_Tox\Project FJes\Onyx\Onyx 2004\May 

2O04\05O4 Final Report.doc 

3-2 July, 2004 
4.0 QUALITY ASSURANC E 

4.1 Introduction 

This section presents the results of all QA/QC measures implemented during the field sampling 

program and all phases of subsequent analysis. Data generated for the program are judged to be 

valid as overall accuracy and precision results are consistent with general objectives. Analytical 

QA/QC data are presented to support all sample results used for determining compliance with 

perfonnance criteria or emission standards. Throughout the overall program, all sampling was 

performed using sampling protocols described herein and approved by USEPA and the Illinois 

Environmental Protection Agency. 

4.1.1 Pre-Sampling Activities 

Pre-sampling activities included equipment calibration, sample media preparation, cleaning of sample 

train glassware, preparation of computer-generated sample labels and other miscellaneous tasks. 

Each of these activities are described or referenced in the following subsections. Other pre-sampling 

activities included such details as team meetings, equipment packing and shipment, equipment setup, 

and finalization of all details leading up to the coordinated initiation ofthe sampling program. 

4.1.2 Equipment Calibration 

A most important aspect of pre-sampling preparations was the inspection and calibration of all 

equipment used for the field effort. Equipment was inspected for proper operation and durability prior 

to calibration. Calibration of equipment was conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in 

the EPA document entitled "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems; 

Volume III—Stationary Source Specific Methods" (EPA-600/4-77-027b). Equipment calibration was 

performed in accordance with EPA guidelines and/or manufacturer's recommendations. Examples of 

field equipment used and typical calibration requirements follows: 

• PROB E NOZZLE S (QA Handbook Section 3.4.2, pg. 19) - measurements of the nozzle ID (to 

the nearest 0.001-in.) along three different diameters with a micrometer. Difference 

between the high and low values should not exceed 0.004 in. Post-test checks - inspect 

for damage. 

• PITOT TUBE S (QA Handbook Section 3.1.2, pp. 1-13) - measured for appropriate spacing 

and dimensions or calibrate in a wind tunnel. Rejection criteria given on the calibration 

sheet. Post-test checks - inspect for damage. 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2004\May 

2004\0504 Final Report.doc 

4-1 July, 2004 
| /NrERNAriOAlAL 

• T HERMOCOUPLE S (QA Handbook Section 3.4.2, pp. 15-18) - verity against a mercury-inglass thermometer at two or more points including the anticipated measurement range. 

Acceptance limits - impinger ±2°F; DGM ±5.4°F; stack ±1.5 percent of stack temperature. 

• DRY GA S METER S (QA Handbook Section 3.4.2, pp. 1-12) - calibrate against a wet test 

meter. Acceptance criteria - pretest Yi = Y ± 0.2; post test Y = ± 0.05 Yi. 

• FIELD BAROMETER S (QA Handbook Section 3.4.2, pp. 18-19) - compare against a mercuryin-glass barometer or use Airport Station BP and correct for elevation. Acceptance criteria 

- ± 0.02 in. Hg; post-test checks - same. 

4.1.3 Glassware Preparation 

Sample train glassware and sample containers required specialized pre-cleaning to avoid 

contamination ofthe sample from the collection container or devices. Cleaning/storage procedures for 

sample train glassware are summarized below. Note that all bottle caps are fitted with Teflon liners, 

which were cleaned in the same manner as the bottles themselves. Sample containers used for waste 

feed streams are purchased pre-cleaned and sealed to specified EPA protocols. 

• EPA METHO D 0010 / 0023A GLASSWAR E AN D CONTAINER S (PCDDs/PCDFs) - washed with 

soap and water, rinsed three times with deionized (DI) water, baked at 400°C for 2-hours, 

rinsed three times with pesticide grade methylene chloride, rinsed three times with pesticide 

grade toluene and air dry. 

• EPA METHO D 29 / 0060 GLASSWAR E AN D CONTAINER S (METALS ) - washed with soap and 

water, rinsed with hot tap water and rinsed three times with reagent water. The glassware 

was soaked in a 10% nitric acid solution for a minimum of 4-hours, rinsed three times with 

reagent water, rinsed a final time with acetone and air-dried. All glassware openings where 

contamination can occur are covered with Parafilm until the sampling train was assembled 

prior to sampling. 

4.1.3.1 Sampling Media Preparation 

All reagents were checked in accordance with ENSR's existing QC Program to minimize the probability 

of using contaminated solvents. This included the use of the proper grade reagents/solvents as 

specified in the test method, selection of reagents from the same lot and collection and analysis of the 

appropriate blanks. Sampling media was procured and prepared in accordance with the appropriate 

test methods as described below: 

• XAD resin used in the Method 0023A train was purchased new and packed in specially designed 

sorbent traps. All glass cleaning and sorbent packing procedures followed the protocols specified 

in EPA Method 0023A. 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 20O4\May 

2004\0504 Final Reportdoc 

4-2 July, 2004 
• Quartz filters used in the Method 29 / 0060 sampling train were purchased from Pallflex Products 

Co. who pre-screen filters for metals content. 

4.2 Chain of Custody 

Chain-of-custody procedures were followed for all samples as follows: 

• Each isokinetic train was set-up and recovered in a clean area adjacent to the incinerators. 

• Samples were collected, sealed and labeled accordingly. 

• Samples were packed in bubble wrap or other absorbent material and placed in sample 

coolers or appropriate DOT shipping packages (dangerous goods items). 

• Associated chain-of-custody's were placed in each shipping container. 

• All samples were subsequently shipped via Priority Overnight FedEx service to the designated 

laboratory. 

4.3 Analytical QA/QC 

Data Quality Indicators (DQI's) were utilized throughout the program to assess the validity of analytical 

data. This section provides a review of these indicators and the subsequent impact on the analytical 

data. 

4.3.1 Analysis for PCDDs/PCDFs 

Evaluation of the validity of the PCDD/PCDF data resultant from the analysis of the Method 23A 

sampling train samples was based on four sets of DQIs. These were: 

• Recoveries of intemal, pre-spike surrogates and alternate recovery standards added to the 

samples prior to sampling; 

- Results of analysis of Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) for the 17 PCDD/PCDF isomers listed in 

EPA Method 23; 

• Results of analyses of field and method blank samples for PCDD/PCDFs. 

These results are included with the Alta Analytical Data Report included in Appendix D. On the basis 

of these QC results, no sample analyses were rejected and all the data were determined to be valid. 

4.3.2 Analysis for Metals 

Evaluation of the validity of metals data resulting from the analysis of the Method 29 sampling train 

samples was based on the following two sets of DQI's: 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2004\May 

2004\0504 Final Report doc 

4-3 July, 2004 
E*Ht 

\//iT£Flt/AT/OAIAL 

• Recoveries of internal, pre-spike and alternate recovery standards added to the samples prior 

to sampling. Recoveries of these standards are included with other analytical data in 

Appendix D. 

• Results of analyses of field and method blank samples for metals. These results are included 

in Appendix D. 

On the basis of these QC results, no sample analyses were rejected and all the data were determined 

to be valid. Completeness was therefore determined to be 100% for all metals results from all 

samples. 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2004\May 

2004V0504 Final Reportdoc 

4-4 July, 2004 
APPENDIX A 

FIELD DATA SHEETS 

J:\Ar_T0K\Project Files\OnyxV0nyx 2004\May 2O04VApperK& Covera.doc 

July 2004 
PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVER Y DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train: Recovered by: 

Run No. Ut9- ~

 ggt e

 • [Run No. &f Date: S~ 

XAD Module No. \XAD Module No.: 

Filter No., Filter No.: 3 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

iff -

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

f (ffi 

J H 

/av /so 

DIFF DIFF: 

Totals Totals 

Initial 

Weight 

(9) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) DIFF: 

Initial 

Weight 

(9) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) DIFF: 
Method 0023A Sampling Parameters 

Unit 2 

Run No. U2-R1 Run 3 Run 4 

Date 05-May-04 06-May-04 06-May-04 

Start Time Units 9:35 10:10 14:15 

Stop Time 12:38 11:43 17:23 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.429 0.429 0.429 0.429 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.45 29.55 29.55 29.52 

Net Sampling Time min. 176.7 180.0 180.0 178.9 

Volume Metered dcf 133.770 135.720 138.897 136.129 

Avg. DGM Temp. °F 81.2 84.9 91.8 85.9 

Avg Delta H in H2 0 1.78 1.74 1.80 1.77 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1305 0.1281 0.1324 0.1303 

DGM Calibration Factor — 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 125.541 126.931 128.302 126.925 

Total Water Collected mL 1960.9 2178.1 2083.1 2074.0 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 92.456 102.697 98.218 97.791 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 42.4 44.7 43.4 43.5 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 101.5 101.2 101.2 101.3 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M — 0.5759 0.5528 0.5664 0.5650 

C 0 2 at Stack %dry 4.50 4.20 4.30 4.33 

0 2 at Stack %dry 10.40 10.50 10.50 10.47 

CO + N2 %dry 85.10 85.30 85.20 85.20 

Diy Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.14 29.09 29.11 29.11 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.41 24.13 24.29 24.28 

Excess Air at Stack % 86.2 87.4 87.6 . 87.0 

Stack Diameter inches C"39.0 }) 39.0 / 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. :ir94 ^ 1194:6' 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in H 2 0 r

0.30 "~~ 0731 —0315 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.47 29.57 29.57 29.54 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 363.3 377.8 377.7 372.9 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P — 0.4171 0.4172 0.4240 0.4194 

SDE Average — 11.966 12.077 12.273 12.105 

Pitot Coefficient — 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,922^ 1,948 1,973 1,948 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 15,948 16,161 16,369 16,159 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 10,075 10,067 10,198 10,113 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,802 5,564 5,776 5,71* 

Isokinetics % 101 105 102 103 

Meter Box No. — 80754 80754 80754 — 

Delta H @ in. Hg 1.9151 1.9151 1.9151 — 

Field QAYqc — 0.969 0.966 0.966 0.967 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 0.4% 0.7% 0.8% 0.6% 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2CKM\May 2004\[U2 M 0O23A isojdsJDATA 
Method 29 Metals Sampling Parameters 

UNIT 4 

Run No. Run 1 Run 3 Run 4 

Date 5/4/2004 5/4/2004 5/4/2004 

Start Time Units 845 1232 1448 

Stop Time 1046 1433 1649 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.283 0.283 0.283 0.283 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.45 29.45 29.45 29.45 

Net Sampling Time min. 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 

Volume Metered dcf 81.633 79.633 78.466 79.911 

Avg. DGM Temp. op 70.2 83.0 81.7 78.3 

Avg Delta H in H2 0 1.50 1.39 1.38 1.42 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1099 0.1020 0.1011 0.1044 

DGM Calibration Factor -- 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 78.146 74.416 73.498 75.353 

Total Water Collected mL 1198.5 1129.3 1118.1 1148.6 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 56.509 53.246 52.718 54.158 

Moisture (measured) %v/v 42.0 41.7 41.8 41.8 

Moisture (@ saturation) %vA/ 101.7 101.7 101.7 101.7 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%h — 0.5803 0.5829 0.5823 0.5819 

C 02 at Stack %dry 4.60 4.00 4.30 4.30 

02 at Stack %dry 12.90 12.80 12.80 12.83 

CO + N 2 %dry 82.50 83.20 82.90 82.87 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.25 29.15 29.20 29.20 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.53 24.50 24.52 24.52 

Excess Air at Stack % 145.3 139.7 140.9 141.9 

Stack Diameter inches V. 48.0> 48.0 48.0 48.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1809.6 1809.6 1809.6 1809.6 

Static Pressure in H2 0 -0.44 -0.46 -0.44 -0.45 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.42 29.42 29.42 29.42 

Avg. Stack Temp. op 384.0 392.1 393.1 389.7 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P 

-

0.8471 0.8507 0.8687 0.8555 

SDE Average ~ 24.609 24.833 25.372 24.938 

Pitot Coefficient — 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 3,948 3,986 4,071 4,001 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 49,608 50,089 51,154 50,284 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 30,513 30,516 31,129 30,719 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 17,708 17,788 18,127 17,874 

Isokinetics % 10® ' 100 ' 97 " 101 \ 

Meter Box No. — 80754 80754 80754 --

Delta H @ in HjO 1.9151 1.9151 1.9151 — 

Field QA Yqc — 0.9782 0.9794 0.9875 0.9817 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 0.53% 0.66% 1.49% 0.90% 

J:\Air_TOK\Projsct Rles\On)nAOnys 2004\May 2004\[U4 M28 Iso.xIsJDATA 
ORSAT ANALYSIS (EPA METHOD 3) 

PLANT: On^a 

DATE: JT 

SOURCE: 

SAMPLE TYPE 

OPERATOR: 

PRE-LEAK CHECK: 

POST-LEAK CHECK: 

NOTE: • 

<i/aid Leak Check: Liquid level must not fall 

^beiow bottom of capillary tubing in 4 minutes 

and meniscus must not change by more than 

0.2 mL in 4 minutes. 

NOTES / DATA CRITERIA -

C 0 2 : When greater than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.3% or less. 

When less than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less. 

Oz : When greater than or equal to 15%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less. 

When less than 15%, difference between readings shall be 0.3% or less. 

Run#^H- ft. 1 Reading A Reading B Reading C 

GAS Actual Net Actual Net Actual Net Avg. 

co2 

Oz 13-0 17,4-

Run* UH -rt ^-Reading A Reading B Reading C 

GAS Actual Net Actual Net Actual Net Avg. 

c o2 tf-.o 

o2 />.sRun # UM (If Reading A Reading B Reading C Avg. 

GAS Actual Net Actual Net Actual Net Net 

Avg. 

Net 

C 02 f . v + f V-3 

02 17.0 f 7.0 

Run # Reading A Reading B Reading C 

GAS Actual Net Actual Net Actual Net Avg. 

co2 

o2 

Run # VAR- R1 Reading A Reading B Reading C 

GAS Actual Net Actual Net Actual Net Avg. 

co2 %< t-< ^< y . r 

Oa ISCO /©•<" IS~° jo- y 

Run* U>- &3 Reading A Reading B Reading C Avg. 

GAS Actual Net Actual Net Actual Net Net 

Avg. 

Net 

co2 f r \ r Hz 7-

o2 i i i 10$ 

Run* U> - <l>f Reading A Reading B Reading C 

GAS Actual Net Actual Net Actual Net Avg. 

co2 1.3 

o2 /Y.t /t>. ^ If.7 /». r 

Run* Reading A Reading B Reading C 

GAS Actual Net Actual Net Actual Net Avg. 

C 02 

o2 

Run* Reading A Reading B Reading C 

GAS Actual Net Actual Net Actual Net Avg. 

c o2 

o2 

Run* Reading A Reading B Reading C 

GAS Actual Net Actual Net Actual Net Avg. 

C 02 

o2 
ENSR . 

PRELIMINARY SAMPL E TRAIN RECOVERY DATA SHEE T 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train: Recovered by: Ji ^ r\of-r\% 

Run No. U3i-^ i Date: f-S~-of Run No. U 9 — Date : S~S~°T 

XAD Module No.: XAD Module No.: 

1 Filter No. : Q^^^l^- Filter No.: <?(A«M-4-1_ 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

1 

XO 

^~ 

1 

2 /oa 2 /(TO 

J/J . 

3 / o 0 

f 

3 / o D 

/ o -

4 0 4 O r 

5 5 

6 6 V r 

7 7 

DIFF : DIFF: 

Totals Totals 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF : 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) DIFF: 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

\ ^ 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Net H2 0 

Gain, mL 

Net H2 0 

Gain, mL 
lil . E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPLIN G - FIEL B BAT A SHEE T 

::-:tMPif«sEHVoL>s;::j Orsat 

Sampling Train M 21 Barometric Pressure J*). JTy* //* LEAK CHECKS In "Hg :-:»irr.:':-:- •:FINAL:-:-:-:' 3UNSE :co2: •:-:o2:-

Run Number RUL/I H Static Pressure (4/-) o.?a ' INITIAL VAC /<f in. CFM 0,OC^L <<t> io/st (O.f Client MY* Probe/Pitot Number jj.K-H'ti MID VAC. 

- — in. CFM , 

(O.f 

Facility Location Sou Pitot Cc*fflclent FINAL VAC 7 in. CFM 0. ddcl 

ft? /O.S Source Filter Box No. + • + - o & ft? /O.S 

Dote Meter Boz No. 86CfX INIT. PITOT FINAL PITOT 

Operato 76. < r li^^is Chinee Coefficient 00 Q . 0,f 7J FILTE R DAT A 76. < 

Stack Dia.-in. 2<J"' Delta H@ •y,mm&;-:- ^ • ^ /o.) Start Time Nozzle Size/No. 

Stop Time XT75 //-<?% XAD Thermocouple ID: Jl JjA :.:.:.:.:.SlWCAfiEi>::::-:-Final Purge Rate 

Imp Outlet TC ID: Mo Final PH . 

wtocrrv iiiiiiii^fiE^iiiii TEMPERATURE REAilNGS,

 0 F jiilliwHijpiiiiil 

TOI1VC TIMS BEAK Msswvtut,; warn iiiYioljiji^j; OOMMEJSTS 

beuaELintfi! MODIftE iiiiiiiiiii; iijiiiiist^riiiiii jiiiii&i;itti:i;i; 

1 O o./<> / . 9 J6? s§/ /A 9J. ?d 

a./st J.O /v\7.o 36,9 ~JSJ S7 ?0 

3 Jo o. /9 j. / •ifa. 7 ,?70 JS*/ S7? 9^ ^ o 

9 Zo O.JG J.J /SV, l B R7J JSL I " SV / O 1 

3~ Q.J.O JZ.J- /C>7. O I C 7 /o3 f.sO &> A. 2- /PJ". c> j<rs 1 S9 s*Y 

l GO a. /.V Jk/l ~ 7 9c 

A 70 o./7 /.? M>.J JJ? JS7y ¥7 ft S*» 0 / 7 /.9 /97, V 2S</ 2M >^r 

y 76 a./? JJ £93 sy 

r so<? 0./7 / . ? 2/3. 3 ?7<^ JS~9~ JSC JoC 97 r.o 

4* / . 9 /LJ 

- 3 

> 

ri'i'i-i'i-i'i'i*:*:' 
m a 

Sampling Train yC/J^ 

Run Number 

Client 

FacUity Location 

Source 

Dais 

Operator 

Stack Dia,-in. 

Start Time 

Stop Time 

E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPLIN G - FIEL D DAT A SHEE T 

(rail 4. 

Barometric Pressure 

Static Pressure (+0 0. 3V " " 

Probe/Pitot Number Atf-V'/lf 

Pitot Coefficient Q. 

Filler Ba No. A/jf-J 

Meter Box No. 

LEAK CHECKS in "Hg 

INITIAL VAC /5 " In. CFM Q, CO 2 

MID VAC In. CFM — 

FINAL VAC, d in. CFM gj. QC?/ 

BflT. PITOT, FINAL PITOT i 

/tvo /Joe, 

/Son 

Orifice Coemdent OOP. 9J~7 ? 

Delta H@ "^.'oSiS"? 

Nozzle Size/No. £>. ylZfr 

XAD Thermocouple D3: 

FILTER DATA 

_L 

: FINAL::' 

:S1UCA6BL 

iAMPU 

PQIW 

CMJC K 

TIMS iiliijjii^lji^jiiiiiil JttBtCTVQL, 

SttaH.lhtfc 

VOIEJUMEft? 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, °F MJMJP 

VACtrt)M 

in.Hg 

COMMENTS 

iAMPU 

PQIW 

CMJC K 

TIMS iiliijjii^lji^jiiiiiil JttBtCTVQL, 

SttaH.lhtfc 

VOIEJUMEft? liiisrtA&i&i MODULE 

MJMJP 

VACtrt)M 

in.Hg 

COMMENTS 

iAMPU 

PQIW 

CMJC K 

TIMS iiliijjii^lji^jiiiiiil JttBtCTVQL, 

SttaH.lhtfc 

VOIEJUMEft? liiisrtA&i&i MODULE lilijipiJ^:;;!: 

MJMJP 

VACtrt)M 

in.Hg 

COMMENTS 

/ O./C /.? W./7L 2</<r £V 77 

a n / . 9 SJ. 3 AYS Z5J </2 %2 77 

J O O.JU S2.7 47 37 79 j~ro 

V 0.19 2.C - ,?<p? AT/ 1° 3/ 

o.2& 2.2 71. 7 22*} CTY k yj? 

& o./7 /.? "ki. <c 372 2Y2 SIP y . r SLT 

1 &.JC A ? p.o/nsr £.<// 2Vf 6,2- <T7 

a 7* /.<* Jf£9 .1 C JSD i*6 9 7 j~,o 

y 3* i>./¥ 37a JYY Jff 

77> <s.lo J.2 /// . y 37J 2V3 2£S~ n 7(9 

r /£>& a.J*> J*. 2 2/Y JT3 j£T 1/ Co 

,/& a. 19 2o /J7. C, JS"/ 097 SL 9/ 

/.1</V9.<r — p. — —.. 

3UNSE 

3xn 

Orsat 

:co2: •:-:o2-:-

4> 

Final Purge Rale 
E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPLIN G - FIEL D DAT A SHEE T 

Sampling Train 

Run Number 

Client 

Facility Location 

Source 

Date __ _ 

Operator 

Barometric Pressure 

'*M— 

Stack Dia.-in. 

Start Tin* ~ y^/f r 

Static Pressure 

Probe/Pitot Number MC-V-S 

Pitot Coefficient d.l?/ 

Filter Box No. 2 

Meter Box No. yo&/.2 

LEAK CHECKS in "Hg 

INITIAL VA C /'J"* " 

MID VA C 

FINAL VA C (Q 

CFM 

CFM 

C FM 0,Qe>i 

StopTtae /sy / 

OrinaCoetncient (Y) <3.9^T^7~ 

Delta H @ 

Noole Size/No. Q, YJ7 

XAD Thermocouple D3; 

Imp Outlet TCP): 

iNrr-prroT FINAL PITOT 

FILTER DAT A 

:FMAL V 

SILlCAfiEL: 

3UNSE 

Orsat 

:co2:- •::o2-:-

Final Purge Rale 

Final PH 

SAWSLS 

;;;|a^;ttii|iin:*c:i:; OtlJaH.ln ft* 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, °F 

jijy&StiijM;;! 

liiHijiiiirSsiiii:; 

COMMENTS 

SAWSLS 

;;;|a^;ttii|iin:*c:i:; OtlJaH.ln ft* MODULE 

jijy&StiijM;;! 

liiHijiiiirSsiiii:; 

COMMENTS 

SAWSLS 

;;;|a^;ttii|iin:*c:i:; OtlJaH.ln ft* MODULE iiiiiiPifiiiii iiiiiiburi^i: 

jijy&StiijM;;! 

liiHijiiiirSsiiii:; 

COMMENTS 

./ <3 /. £ 22? 7X2. LJ 9. c"r 

/ o J.7 9cS. L> 27t> 2</s JS/ ft? 2LT JT!<b 

J J O rt./T /. 7 </72. 6 37/ JTJ j S~/ P t~.sf & / 7 /.9 979-. * 37/ J ?9 j r / / S9 99 

r Y 6 <%.IV /./> 7*7. V 373 JL90 29/ SJ % 27 So 

X* 0.i4 99V. J 37/ 2Y* 2YJ SY fr: S~,c> 

i (2> 0 / 9 3£>Sf 2Vt> *<rr 60 <?? 

70 O./S / 7 SCOB.2 ZGLY 293 J9<} yc 8r ss~ /.w/^FA^-F Z&UA Co 

j 6 . iJ /o/s: i 3<o7 239 SbSI 6,7 9/ 22 S'£> 

a , it* /.? 3i*r 39? •2<T2 SJ V* S.S~ 

0.>7 A 9 /ca<g. t 36,9 296 S7 2V 

/ " &./C 352 Go ?? 6 o 

/ 6 9J . 7J9 

-= 
E m . E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPLIN G - FIEL D DAT A SHEE T 

: xiMPWC pivot's;:-: 1 Orsat 

Sampling Train X4 Barometric Pressure r/' f S LEAK CHECKS in "Hg XINIT.-XV •IFINALXX - •3UNSE :C<H: •:-:o2-:-

Run Number $ u r t j Static Pressure (-hg 0,27! INITIAL VA C /£ " In. CFM 

Client 

Probe/Pitot Number JJK- ¥ - /? MID VA C ia CFM soo 

Faculty Location H . Pitot Coefficient FINAL VA C / in. CF M O.OO i 

Source Filter Box No. HR' + V 

Date S/rJs Y Meter Box No. INIT. PITOT * S FINAL PITOT 

Operator Zrr/tS. Orifice CoetOcient oo o.^sy f FILTER DATA 

Stack Dia.-in. V Delta H @ 2.09X7 •y-wmttL--'-: TARE::-: 

Start Time (yiss" JI// Nozzle Size/No. 

Stop Tune XAD Thermocouple ID: W/ f : X SILIC »SEi>:-:-:-:-:- Final Purge Rale " 

Imp Outlet TC ID: CZ- ? Final PH .. 

i SAMPLE VSPtOOTY PRlftC t <J*$IW]EEft TEMPERATURE READINGS, °F PUMP 

THU S &EAB >rtT?»VctL, VOMJME- ORGANIC j:j:i:|:utiiz1*Kte*|i|:|:i VACUUM. COMMENTS 

IWtaPite** JWtaB,ilnrt ft? fftOBE OVEN MOflDLE IN iu. Hg 

I d> O./V /.< V 277. 8(39 2YS" /*7 7/ 7..S 

JO /(*' 3i?y.v 2/«2 2"T/ <JY 7? 70 y. a 

? JL£5 0.4 2 3<77. / 3<*2 -ZTt? YS 77 7/ y .o 

Y ? o / . £ 3io3 JV7 8. 73. y . o 

sT o. /s ~ / 7 9<W. i ?(W JSS a y T * ~ 

y . j r 

6> / / 3«W JSd y r~ 7S~ 3.S 

I „(Cf2lC J.7 ? ^ 2TS «?» 

J 7£> O. / 7 912? 2VC */ BP 

<k£> 0./ 7 /.? KO.2 JNY 

Y 9* o . / r 1.1 9X7. 7 /<^ r 24/ r j i , S.u 

r © • j ~ J.7 9VY. 7 <vfe 7 2V/ J-/ S.Q 

Cf JS* J.O ?<V, f AYY JK~<£> SY fo s:s~ 

$mJt— 

r 

... 
Unit 2 

PT 

RUN l AVGSMETAL S RUN 3 AVGS - METALS RUN 4 AVGS - MET; i LS 

PT Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

a1 0.14 0.3742 71 69 1.54 361 0.16 0.4000 78 77 1.80 364 0.16 0.4000 92 90 1.80 368 

a2 0.15 0.3873 73 70 1.60 362 0.17 0.4123 82 77 1.90 365 0.18 0.4243 96 90 2.00 369 

a3 0.12 0.3464 77 71 1.30 362 0.16 0.4000 87 79 1.80 367 0.19 0.4359 99 92 2.10 370 

a4 0.15 0.3873 81 73 1.60 363 0.18 0.4243 90 81 2.00 369 0.20 0.4472 101 93 2.20 372 

a5 0.15 0.3873 84 75 1.70 364 0.20 0.4472 93 83 2.20 372 0.20 0.4472 103 94 2.20 373 

a6 0.10 0.3162 86 75 1.10 364 0.17 0.4123 95 85 1.90 372 0.20 0.4472 104 95 2.20 374 

b1 0.15 0.3873 83 81 1.70 366 0.16 0.4000 88 87 1.80 368 0.16 0.4000 96 95 1.80 368 

b2 0.17 0.4123 86 81 1.90 365 0.17 0.4123 92 87 1.90 369 0.17 0.4123 99 95 1.90 369 

b3 0.17 0.4123 89 82 1.90 364 0.18 0.4243 95 88 2.00 370 0.17 0.4123 102 95 1.90 370 

b4 0.15 0.3873 92 83 1.70 365 0.20 0.4472 98 89 2.20 372 0.19 0.4359 104 96 2.10 371 

bS 0.15 0.3873 94 85 1.70 367 0.20 0.4472 100 91 2.20 374 0.17 0.4123 106 97 1.90 374 

b6 0.14 0.3742 96 87 1.60 366 0.18 0.4243 100 91 2.00 375 0.17 0.4123 107 98 1.90 375 

AVG 0.15 0.3799 81.0 1.61 364 0.18 0.4209 88.0 1.98 370 0.18 0.4239 97.5 2.00 371 
Method 29 Metals Sampling Parameters 

UNIT 2 

Run No. Run 1 Run 3 Run 4 

Date 05/05/04 05/06/04 05/06/04 

Start Time Units 9:35 10:10 14:15 

Stop Time 12:11 13:00 16:53 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.429 0.429 0.429 0.429 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.45 29.55 29.55 29.52 

Net Sampling Time min. 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 

Volume Metered dcf 80.781 90.379 92.516 87.892 

Avg. DGM Temp. °F 81.0 88.0 97.5 88.8 

Avg Delta H in HaO 1.61 1.98 2.00 1.86 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1185 0.1452 0.1471 0.1369 

DGM Calibration Factor — 0.9573 0.9573 0.9573 0.9573 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 74.587 82.730 83.260 80.192 

Total Water Collected mL 1270.7 1469.8 1407.4 1382.6 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 59.914 69.301 66.359 65.191 

Moisture (measured) %vA/ 44.5 45.6 44.4 44.8 

Moisture (@ saturation) % vA/ 101.5 101.2 101.2 101.3 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%f> — 0.5545 0.5442 0.5565 0.5517 

C 02 at Stack %dry 4.50 4.20 4.30 4.33 

02 at Stack %dry 10.40 10.50 10.50 10.47 

CO + N 2 %dry 85.10 85.30 85.20 85.20 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.14 29.09 29.11 29.11 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.18 24.04 24.18 24.13 

Excess Air at Stack % 86.2 87.4 87.6 87.0 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in HzO 0.28 0.34 0.30 0.31 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.47 29.58 29.57 29.54 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 364.1 369.8 371.1 368.3 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P ~ 0.3799 0.4209 0.4239 0.4083 

SDE Average 10.907 12.126 12.221 11.751 

Pitot Coefficient 

-

0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,761 1,960 1,969 1,897 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 14,608 16.258 16,337 15,734 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 9,219 10,226 10,258 9,901 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,112 5,565 5,709 5,462 

Isokinetics % 100 102 100 101 

Meter Box No. — 80612 80612 80612 — 

Delta H @ in H2 0 2.0957 2.0957 2.0957 — 

Field QA Yqc — 0.9929 0.9874 0.9787 0.9863 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 3.72% 3.15% 2.24% 3.03% 

J:\Air_Tox\Projsct Files\Ony)AOnyx 2004\May 2004\fU2 M29 Iso.xIsJDATA 
ENSR . 

/A/r£/JA/A r/O/VAL 

PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVER Y DATA SHEE T 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train : ^ Recovered by : 

Sun No. U^"" ^ Date: ^7//» / J?IWI /Vo. Da/e : 

XAD Module No.: X4D Module No. : 

Filter No. : Q,K^6~<-X"U Filter No. : 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

1 5* fs- j 

) 1 

2 1 b o f 6 2 

3 / o o / i f 3 

4 0 f 4 

• 

5 5 

6 6 

7 7 

DIFF: DIFF: 

Totals Totals 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF: 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF: 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger • , f *• j, t " 

Net H2 0 

Gain, mL \v\&. \ 

Net H2 0 

Gain, mL 
ENS ? 

PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVER Y DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train. 

RunNo. mH- & \ Date: c h U j Run No. U 7

 - <*~JfD ate: 

XAD Module No., K 

\XAD Module No. 

Filter No.: //V Filter No. 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

fe 

5~° 

3*H 

29 

7 

j o o 

| (TP 

0G 

9-^ 

DIFF DIFF: 

Totals Totals 

Initial 

Weight 

(9) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF: 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

v*5 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger \<v 3 

Net H2 0 

Gain, mL 

s ^ 6 Net H2 0 

Gain, mL 
E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPLIN G - FIEL D DAT A SHEE T 

: XMPIN C EK voL's;:-: Orsat 1 

Sampling Train jmx 9 Barometric Pressure LEA K CHECKS in "Hg xwrx.:-::- •/HNAL:-:-:-:- •SiNSE :co2: •::o2:| 

Run Number RUA 9 Static Pressure JW-) INITIAL VAC. / f la- CFM OjOc Q 1 

Client Probe/Pitot Number JJ r- f-JK MID VA C in. CFM — 

Facility Location S&u, Pilot Coefficient o.U FINAL VA C _ ? ln. CFM d>'OOI 

Source ti<J0 FUlcrBoxNo. + + 0 

Date fey Meter Box No. %t>7£t INIT. PITOT «•' FINAL PITOT j^C— 

Operator 

Orifice Coefficient (Y) O.'ilj'Q FILTER DAT A 

Stack Dia.-ln. vf g V Delia H @ s.9/JTi v:«JMjttJty: 1 

Start Time /99ff Nozzle Size/No. 0.J43 (iuc2i- Stop Time is** XAD Thermocouple ID: X/J A :::::siucAfiEL:::-:: - Final Purge Rale 

Imp Ouuet TC ID: 2/Y.S Final FH 

iiiif^iyi^ii^iiiii;i TEMPERATURE READINGS, °F ;;iii|iii^j:jii 

iiiiiiiiiiiii; |||^jiiigiiiii B B S iij:i*«lii^-i;;:iii:i GASiMBtEB ;:iij^Jj3(ii)i^;! OOMMEJSfrS 

BeitaPitos** SeitaK.liifH liililiiiilSiililiiiilHH;!! ;i;iSSAiCHi!l MODULE iiliiifiiiliii o u r iiiijiiiiiiftliiiiii 

i O.K2. 979.269 3%7 2<2 JT» JaCo 79 77 

X Ji J.J. Jwi.a 392 299 29? 1 S/ %<r 79 

.) J-6 j.sT 392 26>a 199 SCJ, 79 .?, a 

v 10 / V 393 Ji9 SI 9f.T 7X 

r 90 <3.7rt A3 /<?<?/. <r J9& jsr a&Q .CC 8L 79 2.,r 

6, .ip J.J •«*<S7 . ? 29.<T 2t<*a .CP §7 2.Q 

I 0,79 Ay /a/3.9J2 39 V 2o/ JbSJ. <£» / V7 

9o o.7Y J:? /OAo. V 392 262 291 (/> f S"/ 

3 o.'ka /. *r JeJ*.. 9 J f 0 2 2</J ,T7 79 

H fo o.?7 J.V 2V? SLYQ .*rj- 7 y 

. r /<?<? 39 7 2YC 2J.7 , r v %2 

& no J&VYe.S 2Yr*T 2^7") 

/ 

* 
E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPLIN G - FIEL D DAT A SHEE T 

:-xiMPiNOfcK VOL'S;:-: Orsat 

Sampling Train j Barometric Pressure / " 7"^ LEAK CHECKS in "Hg xwrr.:-:-.'- vFINAL:-:-:-:- BINSE- C02: •:-:o2-> 

Run Number J SlaUc Pressure (+/-) INITIAL VA C V< -

in. CFM Q.CXt¥ lf.0 Client Probe/Pitot Number MH) VAC. — In. CFM — SO® lf.0 

Facility Location < « Pilot Coemdent FINAL VAC. In. CFM O'00< IMr t lf.0 Source FUter Bois No. + + <£> L lf.0 

Dale SfyM Meter Box No. INIT. PITOT ~ * FINAL PITOT t^-^ if f> \>¥ 

Operator Orifice Coefficient (V) /5 923b FILTER DAT A 

if f> \>¥ 

Stack Dia. • in.

 v yjf/r Delta H @ /.->/<•/ •XNtiMflii*:-: :::>f!Apj6:::-: 

if f> \>¥ 

Start Time Nozzle Size/No. Qui Ax 

Stop Time r>l A llll. 'Y5\ XAD Thermocouple ID: JJJS\ :::::sn.lCAfiEL::::: - Final Purge Rate r>l A 

Imp Outlet TCID: tr-j. 229.3 Final PH d pr 

iiii^jjEjijiiii TEMPERATURE READINGS, °F PUM? 

1 iPQIRt T-IM& ¥QjqUM& QURANIC PAS METES VACUUM OoMMEJirtS 

BeltaPiiEsM BetoB£,lnw<! ft* i STACK. num OVEN MODULE IMPINGER IN Di.Hg 

/ 6 /. 3%S 299 2s?f sS/sl S7 77 

2 /O G. 7f r /, to/. 9 3S9 29O 26,0 \ S7 7R 

3 2& (3.92 / 7 90W.L MX J99 SK K% 7 9 2.o 

9 0 . 7 f /. 9/L.I A9I 2V? SK ll fl. 2. o 

y YO CS7J A . ? ?Al 29i 9o 22 J?.o 

c St> n S9 Li 929, 7 39C 2SW J9r LQ $7 92 

I (oo /. 9 9.?,r 7 / k c 387 JT? 26 o S-7 sry 79 /.s~ P„rr On 

7£> /..r 39 i 29S S7 71 AS 

3 X<5 /. s~~ *1S~I 3K9Ha ss~ 79 s, r~ 

9 9 o 0.7 7 AY 29,<r 2X3 JSla ki ?o 

f A / 2r/ xsy 79 AS6> //£> 299 8S 7% 

Stop S2& 

V 
WM5® 

E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPLIN G - FIEL D DAT A SHEE T 

Sampling Train 

Run Number 

Client 

•£/29 Barometric Pressure 

Facility Location 

Source 

Dat e

 _— 

Operator 

Stack Dia. - in. 

Start Time 

JL 

StaticPressure(+/•) — Q , 

Probe/Pitot Number ,jU/~- </*A. 

Pitot Coefficient Q 

Filter Box No. 

Meter Box No. 

LEAK CHECKS in "Hg 

INITIAL VA C JjT in. 

MID VAC. in. 

FINAL VA C in. 

CFM 

CFM 

CFM 

MX-9 

INIT. PITOT FINAL PITOT 

J,a3 /io v 

Delia H @ /.9/<T/ •XfWAtBEftX /X-TXttE:-:-: 

Nozzle Size/No. <>^JjT 

XAD Thermocouple ID: ^ / 

ttSPIjWJEK VOL'S; 

DOT.-: 

xSh 

SL. 

: FINAL:-: MNS E 

Imp Outlet TC ID: JT-J. 7 Final PH 

PQIWC . 

CLOCK 

H E W 

DtltaP,ta*e/ 

PRIFK * 

Mfct&tvGt, 

DeadBLUnW 

<JA$WJ*B; TEMPERATUR E READINGS , ° F 

Ih. Kg 

PQIWC . ' t^MMEjSftS: 

CLOCK 

H E W 

DtltaP,ta*e/ 

PRIFK * 

Mfct&tvGt, 

DeadBLUnW 

YOLHWfeSTACK MlGSE OVEN 

OKSANid 

MODULE ::iMPiN6RR: Ih. Kg 

PQIWC . ' t^MMEjSftS: 

CLOCK 

H E W 

DtltaP,ta*e/ 

PRIFK * 

Mfct&tvGt, 

DeadBLUnW 

YOLHWfeSTACK MlGSE OVEN 

OKSANid 

MODULE ::iMPiN6RR: iijillJSHilj iiiiiifiifll;!;:; Ih. Kg 

' t^MMEjSftS: 

) o 2SJT a>y (t? 6 f 2. o T 

J JSV JS7 97 77 Z ? 

s3 ft. 7 7 2o>a 99 <TQ 7 J 2 c 

V a to y. 7 3*i2 26S J7<»S s/ 1 ?v 3 o T 

s~ V A SJo 2QU 2f9 . r r \ 2*7 7 £ 

6 JZ> o . t w AST 211 2c*H S7 j ?F TJ V o 

/ o , 7 / 1 39"!/ 2SJ 26' 7#- Yo 

Jt y& 0 . 7 V jsy 2S3 1' Y.& 

J SO 

y 5 A 

-JL. 

//O 

SAf> 

~h 

\ ) 

1 It) \ / ( 7 \ V 

/ / -

Orsat | 

:C02: •:-:o2-:| 

1 

1 
Sampling Train ,^J < f 

Run Number / 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

llSJIWIWWm*:::! 

Static Pressure m ~ g.y y Z 

t -9- A 

Slack Dia.. In. ° <fg' 

LEAK CHECKS in "Hg 

INITIAL VA C X C in. CFM O-O/ Q 

MH) VAC. In. CFM 

|18*riiiatMI»'ai.TriitTOBi;»ici.-<at| 

PTM* 1' VA C 3 tn- CFM G.ab9 

+ + 

INIT. PiTOTfe^fa^TCNALPITOT 

FILTER DATA 

XAD 

PQIffT MEtttVOt , 

BeltaH.inw! 

*JA$WTE R 

VOfiJME 

ft* 

TEMPERATUR E READINGS , ° F 

in Hg 

COMMIT S PQIffT MEtttVOt , 

BeltaH.inw! 

*JA$WTE R 

VOfiJME 

ft* :|iiST^GKiif MOB E 0VS3M MODULE :;lMPiNGEIti 

GA§ 

in Hg 

COMMIT S PQIffT MEtttVOt , 

BeltaH.inw! 

*JA$WTE R 

VOfiJME 

ft* :|iiST^GKiif MOB E 0VS3M MODULE :;lMPiNGEIti IN • OUT in Hg 

COMMIT S 

o isv JSX 6 0 St sv /. <y 

^2 So a.Lj / 3 Z7Y 29G \ Y2 6,2 2.(s 

J O a 77 / 6 77d. 9 3&0 JSC* 29? YY ?/ t*Y J,S~ 

a. 77 2f«$ K? \ y r 73 as J.S" 

*Z / - ? 7*r ; o 2c a 7</9 st? ?3 LS~ s° j 

a.IS / . 6> 79J . .2 J.<ri 2tt ? y L7 J.S 

/ o.v r 799JY 3 37^5- 2SZ. 2&o o>2 7Y toff J.o 

J ! J.S 3 r ? <&&>( 2y3 ss~ 77 ?o 

_ J I *© Q.77 /.&• *//« / 297 2S& X-3 S O 72 J.S 

— 9 » /.ff s/ir. 7 3f6> 3Sh 29S ST 79 7 / J . O 

o r O.R T /.7 M t V . 2 2SS~ as/ S7 7sr T t o ,?.<3 

//£> J. 7 *.?.?.. r 3h 2&Y JS* €ae> 7 ? 7i T o 

£*J /(tu» i 

/ 

,—. 

± 5 * 

Orsat 

•:«»:- •:-:02-:-

IS.6 

4> I4.-V 

ft*1' 

[Final Purge Rate ^ \ ^ 

mmmmm mm MM 
Unit 4 

PT 

RUN 1 AVGS - METALS RUN 3 AVGS - METALS RUN 4 AVGS - METALS 

PT Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

a1 0.45 0.6708 58 58 0.92 350 0.76 0.8718 82 77 1.60 385 0.82 0.9055 79 77 1.50 387 

a2 0.62 0.7874 66 62 1.30 374 0.76 0.8718 86 78 1.60 389 0.88 0.9381 85 79 1.60 392 

a3 0.77 0.8775 71 64 1.60 386 0.82 0.9055 88 79 1.70 391 0.82 0.9055 86 79 1.50 392 

a4 0.77 0.8775 73 65 1.60 389 0.78 0.8832 91 81 1.60 395 0.75 0.8660 85 78 1.40 393 

a5 0.83 0.9110 73 65 1.70 384 0.71 0.8426 90 82 1.30 397 0.70 0.8367 86 79 1.30 396 

a6 0.78 0.8832 74 67 1.60 385 0.59 0.7681 89 82 1.10 396 0.59 0.7681 87 80 1.10 395 

b1 0.45 0.6708 74 68 0.92 375 0.77 0.8775 84 79 1.40 387 0.78 0.8832 87 80 1.40 394 

b2 0.73 0.8544 77 70 1.50 387 0.85 0.9220 85 79 1.50 391 0.74 0.8602 88 81 1.30 392 

b3 0.77 0.8775 80 72 1.60 395 0.85 0.9220 85 79 1.50 390 0.82 0.9055 86 79 1.50 390 

iA 0.86 0.9274 79 71 1.80 396 0.77 0.8775 88 80 1.40 395 0.79 0.8888 86 78 1.40 393 

b5 0.85 0.9220 76 70 1.70 394 0.61 0.7810 86 79 1.10 396 0.74 0.8602 82 76 1.30 397 

b6 0.82 0.9055 79 71 1.70 393 0-47 0.6856 85 78 0.85 393 0.65 0.8062 82 76 1.20 396 

AVG 0.73 0.8471 70.2 1.50 384 0.73 0.8507 83.0 1.39 392 0.76I 0.8687 81.7 1.38 393 
Unit 2 

PT 

RUNl/ LVGS-PCD] Ds/PCDFs RUN 3 AVGS - PCDDs/PCDFs RUN 4 AVGS - PCDDs/PCDFs 

PT DP SQRT 

DP 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

DH STACK 

TEMP 

DP SQRT 

DP 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

DH STACK 

TEMP 

DP SQRT 

DP 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

DH STACK 

TEMP 

a1 0.19 0.4359 54 53 1.90 342 0.18 0.4243 75 74 1.80 375 0.18 0.4243 66 85 1.80 377 

a2 0.18 0.4243 65 55 1.80 356 0.17 0.4123 82 75 1.70 375 0.19 0.4359 92 86 1.80 379 

a3 0.18 0.4243 70 60 1.80 357 0.18 0.4243 86 77 1.80 377 0.19 0.4359 94 88 1.90 379 

a4 0.18 0.4243 75 64 1.80 357 0.18 0.4243 88 81 1.80 377 0.15 0.3873 95 89 1.50 378 

as 0.19 0.4359 79 68 1.90 357 0.18 0.4243 89 80 1.80 378 0.19 0.4359 96 90 1.90 378 

a6 0.17 0.4123 82 71 1.70 358 0.17 0.4123 90 81 1.70 378 0.17 0.4123 96 89 1.70 376 

b1 0.17 0.4123 94 86 1.70 357 0.16 0.4000 84 82 1.60 377 0.18 0.4243 94 89 1.80 377 

b2 0.16 0.4000 99 89 1.60 373 0.18 0.4243 90 83 1.80 379 0.18 0.4243 95 89 1.80 376 

b3 0.17 0.4123 101 91 1.80 374 0.18 0.4243 93 84 1.80 380 0.19 0.4359 97 90 1.90 377 

b4 0.16 0.4000 103 93 1.70 375 0.16 0.4000 94 86 1.60 380 0.18 0.4243 96 91 1.80 379 

b5 0.19 0.4359 104 95 2.00 376 0.17 0.4123 95 86 1.70 379 0.17 0.4123 98 91 1.70 379 

be 0.15 0.3873 103 95 1.60 377 0.18 0.4243 95 87 1.80 379 0.19 0.4359 96 90 1.90 377 

AVG 0.17 0.4171 81.2 1.78 363 0.17 0.4172 84.9 1.74 378 0.18 0.4240 91.8 1.8 378 
Sampling Train 

— ± — 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

LEA K CHECKS In "Hg 

INITIAL VA C \ U in. CFM 

M m VAC. 

C?,©*1 FINAL VA C 

Filler Box No. j-jfe** ? + 

Meier Box No. X>9Si DOT. F1TOT 

Orifice Coefficient 00 © / 

Delia H « 

CFM 

cm.&-oo-5 

FINAL FITOT • 

CfcOCK 

&BAP 

Bellafttei t*i c 

s — 

XAD Thermocouple ID: * 

Imp Outlet TC ID: UVt 3 

_ FILTER DATA 

MPiNfiEK VOL'S;:: 

•:DJTT.:-

TT 

: FINAL:- RINSE 

S I 

002: •: :o2 :-

STACK 

TEMPERATURE READINGS. "F 

WlGBE OVEN 

ORGANIC 

MODULE JMFWSKit IN 

GASMETES : : 

OUT 

PIMP 

VACUUM 

Final PH 

• 6L 

10% $1. CO IZ 

<o. i e 3 Z 

i - 52: 

3i3 _ 

J>2_ 4 £ 9Z. 

1 2. 

2^7 ZHO 2 4 & *T<« SST 

iL2L 3 3 _ aa 

JC?S~ ^ 

yam 

OA QA 

gil° l 

£>l5 " 

z 3 

E E 
Train HZ5/\ 

Facility Location 

a s 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

:in"H 

Start Time 

LEAK CHECKS In "He 

INITIAL VA C \<h in- CFM &t**t1 

ilBiriiiaCTIga'.TfflBBWE 

MD)VAC._ 

FINAL VA C 

fa- CFMQ.dfl l 

in. CFM 

INIT. PITOT FINAL PTTOT 

FILTER DAT A 

mssmmmasm 

a^aggajaj 

••• • 

too 

mm IFtaalPurgel 

lalPH 

Orsat 

COX •:-:o2-:-

mm REA© MKT^Vpt, 

BellaH.iIh* n ! 

IS 

2fc 

38c 

L 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, °F 

^ 5 3 mi 

mm 

QBJtjASIC; 

ISL 

:

tMfW6ESE 

3 E 

•121 

ilffiffiS^iijili.i 

3L 

O U T 

PVM? 

VACtWM. 

to.Hg 

96/ 

ft 

^5L 

^ 3 -

f r 

I I -

90 

t ? 1£L 

32_ 

-30 . 

jaL. •Q.I k .AS. HE s : I S 

WL 

i$5T 

m i 

5t5 

3 s: 
Sampling Train 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

(+/-) 

Start Time 

Stop Time 

i No. 

xNo. 

LEAK CHECKS in 

INITIAL VAC 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC 

CFM Q-oc g 

CFM <g -QO ^ 

-U 

Delta H @ JLBiSC 

mrr.prror FINAL PITOT 

SL 

XAD 

Imp Outlet TCBJ: 

FILTER DATA 

rn-:-

22 

: FINAL:-: 

1EL 

Final PH 

3UNSE 

Orsat 

:co2:-

,a .r 

/*•» ' 

Rate ' 

FOIST 

CtOc K 

TIMS 

YStOtjlTV 

SEAT? MtfJtwvrjL, 

SefcaB,in*<: 

SA$toi*& -

VOWiMEft? 

1^ 

STACK 

3S£ 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, 

ORGANIC: • 

fSSGBg 

m 

MODGLE 

as: 

ZMP1NSBK 

COMMENTS 

32J 

t 

7-51-

2ZSL 1ST S3 V 8 

hr 

3 r f asp 

Oft . 

O . f T5V 

_2o 75X 2 2 * SC. 

7B^ ZHO as 

7 W 

t 

7J50 •S3. 

3fL 5S~ 

~8b 

tjs\^ ^ 
Train 

Eun Number 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING • FIELD DATA SHEET 

(+/-) 

QuoLEAK CHECKS in ^Hg 

INITIAL VA C 

MD) VAC. 

FINAL VAC 

in. CFM 0^2-_ 

CFMO-oafe. 

Stack Dia.-in. 

J2 

1 ^ - to- CFM&.<*>^f 

DWT. PITOT FINAL PITOT 

FILTER DATA 

Delia H @ 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Imp Outlet TC ID: 

3 > > 

!«so 

SST 

Orsat 

:oo2: ::o2v 

/o-r 

/o.r 

Y-1 

I. PH 

POINT. 

i r 

CLOC K 

B M W 

BE 

BeiiaS, In** 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, "F 

" mam " 

mem 

1

7*t 

MODULE IMPINGER 

"ES T 

GAS ME T tH 

S 

PUMP 

VACtWM COMMENTS 

so "3T 8ft 

± 

7 ^ W o " 3 2 6 3 £ 3T 

E E 3 1 2 £ l A T 

3 ? ? Zt*o S aa. 

7 5 s" 

ft 

£32J_ zaa. 

T 3 L 

gap 

S E ba± - ^ 2 to 5 l _ 
/MTEfUVA r/O/VA L 

PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train : U - * V Recovered by : \J\ r*-\ j^-i.« r^.f2 l S 

Run No. Q^-j ^ \ Date: ^ t

 5*- ° f 

XAD Module No.: \XAD Module No. 

Filter No. Filter No.: fit/fic 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

/CT D 

(Oh 

•t, if 37 

6 

DIFF 

Totals Totals 

Initial 

Weight 

(9) 

Final 

Weight 

(9) DIFF 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Net H 2 0 

Gain, mL 

Net H2 0 

Gain, mL 
PRELIMINARY SAMPLE TRAIN RECOVERY DATA SHEET 

FOR MOISTURE DETERMINATION 

Sample Train : - <at>3^ Recovered by: <J"Ir-v A'W/'lJ 

Run No. (I 3, Date; Run No. l\X~KL/ Date: tf. i , 0/ 

XAD Module No. : f 7S"7 XAD Module No.: J f 

Filter No.: QuoJr Filter No.: <Q^«v K 

Impinger 

No. 

Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

Impinger 

No. 

^ Initial 

Volume 

(mL) 

Final 

Volume 

(mL) 

L V 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL) 

1 0 1 £> 

2 j <3T> 2 loo 

3 3 

4 O 4 

6 

5 5 

6 6 

7 7 

DIFF: DIFF: 

Totals Totals 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF : 

Initial 

Weight 

(g) 

Final 

Weight 

(g) DIFF: 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

33 

Silica 

Gel 

Impinger 

Net H2 0 

Gain, mL 

— Net H2 0 

Gain, mL 

— 
APPENDIX B 

PROCESS FEED AND OPERATING CONDITIONS 

J:\AJr_Tox\Praject Fites\OtiyrfOny» 20O4\May 2004\Appa«lix Coventdoc 

July 2004 
y' Onyx Environmental Services, Sauget, IL 

unit 2 Process Operating Data - May 2004 Test Program 

Operating Parameter R1 R3 R4 Average 

Pumpable Waste (Ib/hr) 3051 3131 2827 3003 

Non-pumpable Waste (Ib/hr) 1098 1327 1109 1178 

Total Waste (Ib/hr) 4149 4458 3936 4181 

Stackflow (acfm) 15110 15811 15949 15623 

PCC Temp (deg F) 1739 1706 1691 1712 

SCC Temp (deg F) 1846 1840 1835 1840 

B.H. Inlet Temp (deg F) 421 420 420 420 

Mercury (Ib/hr) 0.00047 0.00170 0.00067 0.00095 

Chlorine (Ib/hr) 262 247 242 250 

Ash (Ib/hr) 2295 2529 2060 2295 
Onyx Environmental Services, Sauget, IL 

Unit 4 Process Operating Data - May 2004 Test Program 

Operating Parameter R1 R3 R4 Average 

Pumpable Waste (Ib/hr) 3286 3298 3291 3292 

Non-pumpable Waste (Ib/hr) 10887 11026 9247 10387 

Total Waste (Ib/hr) 14173 14324 12538 13678 

Stackflow (acfm) 40472 39779 39934 40062 

PCC Temp (deg F) 1512 1481 1495 1496 

SCC Temp (deg F) 1937 1892 1894 1908 

B.H. Inlet Temp (deg F) 419 419 420 419 

Mercury (Ib/hr) 0.0115 0.0131 0.0102 0.0116 

Chlorine (Ib/hr) 152 164 159 158 

Ash (Ib/hr) 10130 10438 10063 10210 

Carbon (Ib/hr) 6 6 6 6 
Onyx Environmental Services, Sauget, IL 

Unit 2, Run 1 Waste Feed Data - May 2004 Test Program 

Unit #2 

Run#1 

Date: 05/05/04 

Test Time: 09:35 to 12:38 

Chlorine Ash Mercury 

PPM Feedrate Loading Loading Loading 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

PCC High Btu 4860 0.5 53 0.46 847 4.24 448.91 0.000390 

PCC Low Btu 1660 0.88 44 0.02 1799 15.83 791.56 0.000036 

PCC Sp Fdr 850 0.5 8.7 0.02 387 1.94 33.67 0.000008 

(Chlorine Spike) 2310 85.5 33 0.021 119 101.75 39.27 0.000002 

PCC Solid Charges 500 0.5 98 0.032 866 4.33 848.68 0.000028 

HCE (Chlorine Spike) 2510 89.9 89 0.02 149 133.95 132.61 0.000003 

CaCI2 (Chlorine Spike) 500 56.9 0 0.00 0.00 0.000000 

Totals 262.03 2294.70 0.000467 
Onyx Environmental Services, Sauget, IL 

Unit 2, Run 3 Waste Feed Data - May 2004 Test Program 

Unit #2 

Run #3 

Date: 05/06/04 

Test Time: 10:10 to 13:30 

Chlorine Ash Mercury 

PPM Feedrate Loading Loading Loading 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury (lb/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

PCC High Btu 5140 0.5 52 1.8 845 4.23 439.40 0.001521 

PCC Low Btu 500 0.5 58 0.06 1775 8.88 1029.50 0.000107 

PCC Sp Fdr 880 0.5 2.6 0.02 465 2.33 12.09 0.000009 

(Chlorine Spike) 3080 85.5 33 0.032 122 104.31 40.26 0.000004 

PCC Solid Charges 500 0.5 98 0.069 853 4.27 835.94 0.000059 

HCE (Chlorine Spike) 3100 89.9 91 0.02 63 56.64 57.33 0.000001 

CaCI2 (Chlorine Spike) 500 56.9 98 0.02 117 66.57 114.66 0.000002 

Totals 247.21 2529.18 0.001703 
Onyx Environmental Services, Sauget, IL 

Unit 2, Run 4 Waste Feed Data - May 2004 Test Program 

Unit #2 

Run #4 

Date: 05/06/04 

Test Time: 14:15 to 17:23 

Chlorine Ash Mercury 

PPM Feedrate Loading Loading Loading 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury (lb/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

PCC High Btu 5190 0.5 51 0.77 778 3.89 396.78 0.000599 

PCC Low Btu 700 0.5 40 0.02 1614 8.07 645.60 0.000032 

PCC Sp Fdr 610 0.5 2 0.02 348 1.74 6.96 0.000007 

(Chlorine Spike) 3480 85.5 33 0.025 119 101.75 39.27 0.000003 

PCC Solid Charges 500 0.5 97 0.035 827 4.14 802.19 0.000029 

HCE (Chlorine Spike) 2770 89.9 92 0.02 63 56.64 57.96 0.000001 

CaCI2 (Chlorine Spike) 500 56.9 97 0.02 115 65.44 111.55 0.000002 

Totals 241.65 2060.31 0.000674 
Onyx Environmental Services, Sauget, IL 

Unit 4, Run 1 Waste Feed Data - May 2004 Test Program 

Unit #4 

Run#1 

Date: 05/04/04 

Test Time-08:45 to 10:46 

Chlorine Ash Mercury 

PPM Feedrate Loading Loading Loading 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

PCC High Btu 4570 0.5 53 0.02 1015 5.08 537.95 0.000020 

PCC Low Btu 1920 0.5 55 1.3 1458 7.29 801.90 0.001895 

PCC Chlorine Spike (X-10) 2680 85.5 2 0.02 107 91.49 2.14 0.000002 

PCC Solid Charges 500 0.5 85 0.19 1560 7.80 1326.00 0.000296 

(Mercury Spike) 500 0.5 2 4900 1.84 0.01 0.04 0.009016 

PCC Bulk Solids 500 0.5 98 0.039 7604 38.02 7451.92 0.000297 

SCC High Btu 10330 0.5 2 0.02 516 2.58 10.32 0.000010 

Totals 12,262 152.26 10130.27 0.011537 
Onyx Environmental Services, Sauget, IL 

Unit 4, Run 3 Waste Feed Data - May 2004 Test Program 

Unit #4 

Run # 3 

Date: 05/04/04 

Test Time: 12:32 to 14:33 

Chlorine Ash Mercury 

PPM Feedrate Loading Loading Loading 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

PCC High Btu 5850 0.5 52 0.12 1061 5.31 551.72 0.000127 

PCC Low Btu 2060 0.5 54 0.18 1500 7.50 810.00 0.000270 

PCC Chlorine Spike (X-10) 3355 85.5 36 0.02 119 101.75 42.84 0.000002 

PCC Solid Charges 500 0.5 98 0.025 1536 7.68 1505.28 0.000038 

(Mercury Spike) 500 0.5 2 5500 1.81 0.01 0.04 0.009955 

PCC Bulk Solids 500 0.5 98 0.35 7669 38.35 7515.62 0.002684 

SCC High Btu 17830 0.5 2 0.02 610 3.05 12.20 0.000012 

Totals 12,497 163.63 10437.70 0.013089 

"V 
Onyx Environmental Services, Sauget, IL 

Unit 4, Run 4 Waste Feed Data - May 2004 Test Program 

Unit #4 

Run #4 

Date: 05/04/04 

Test Time: 14:48 to 16:49 

Chlorine Ash Mercury 

PPM Feedrate Loading Loading Loading 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

PCC High Btu 3490 0.5 58 0.32 1060 5.30 614.80 0.000339 

PCC Low Btu 500 0.5 57 0.13 1501 7.51 855.57 0.000195 

PCC Chlorine Spike (X-10) 4030 85.5 26 0.034 116 99.18 30.16 0.000004 

PCC Solid Charges 500 0.5 98 0.03 1568 7.84 1536.64 0.000047 

(Mercury Spike) 500 0.5 2 4900 1.84 0.01 0.04 0.009016 

PCC Bulk Solids 500 0.5 98 0.087 7152 35.76 7008.96 0.000622 

SCC High Btu 15250 0.5 2.8 0.02 606 3.03 16.97 0.000012 

Totals 12,005 158.62 10063.13 0.010236 

>