alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-52 June 4, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois,

have announced the assignment of Jeffrey Clark as the agency's

Resident Inspector at the Perry Nuclear Power Station in Perry,

Ohio.

Clark joined the NRC in March of this year under the

agency's Resident Development Program. Most recently, he had

been an engineering project manger for Baltimore Gas and Electric

Company. He is a Licensed Professional Engineer. He also served

on submarines in the nuclear power program of the U.S. Navy. He

received a bachelor's degree in technology and management from

the University of Maryland and a bachelor's degree in nuclear

engineering technology from Thomas Edison State College. He also

has a master's degree in environmental engineering from Johns

Hopkins University. Clark and his wife and two children plan to

reside near the Perry plant in Lake County.

Clark joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Don Kosloff at

Perry. They can be reached at 216/259-3610.

####
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: For additional information, see related documents published at 47 FR 57369, Dec. 23, 1982; 48 FR 17101, Apr. 21, 1983; and 48 FR 29096, June 24, 1983.

§ 4.1 What is the purpose of these regulations? ( a ) The regulations in this part implement Executive Order 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,” issued July 14, 1982 and amended on April 8, 1983. These regulations also implement applicable provisions of section 401 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968 and section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966.
( b ) These regulations are intended to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened Federalism by relying on state processes and on State, areawide, regional and local coordination for review of proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development.
( c ) These regulations are intended to aid the internal management of FEMA, and are not intended to create any right or benefit enforceable at law by a party against FEMA or its officers.
#### § 122.29 Arrival fee and overtime services.

Private aircraft may be subject to the payment of an arrival fee for services provided as set forth in § 24.22 of this chapter. For the procedures to be followed in requesting overtime services in connection with the arrival of private aircraft, see § 24.16 of this chapter.

[T.D. 93-85, 58 FR 54286, Oct. 21, 1993]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-146 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, July 13, 1999)

PILOT PROGRAM EVALUATION PANEL

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Program Plant Evaluation Panel will hold its first

meeting on July 28 in Rockville, Maryland.

The NRC established the panel to independently evaluate and review its new inspection,

assessment and enforcement processes now being phased in during a several-month pilot

program at nine nuclear power plants throughout the country. It will meet periodically to review

data being supplied by NRC licensees on plant performance, as well as the results of NRC's

baseline inspection, assessment and enforcement activities.

The July 28 meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in conference room T-2B1

of the agency’s Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike.

Here is the complete meeting agenda:

9:00 - 9:30 a.m. -- Introduction and opening remarks, discussion of release of

information to the public, noticing requirements and public participation.

9:30 - 11:00 a.m. -- Discussion of conduct of panel and rules of operation, location and

frequency of meetings, formation of subcommittees, distribution of transcripts and other

information, approach to report generation and use of facilities.

11:00 a.m. - noon -- Staff presentation of how pilot data are being collected and

analyzed.

1:00 - 2:00 p.m. -- Presentation by the Nuclear Energy Institute -- the nuclear industry's

policy organization -- on industry evaluation efforts and what would be available to the panel.

2:00 - 3:00 p.m. -- Panel discussion on need for any additional data or analyses.

3:00 - 4:00 p.m. -- Discussion and public presentations, future invited speakers, public’s

oral presentations.

Transcripts of the Pilot Program Evaluation Panel’s meetings and reports will be

available through the NRC’s Public Document Room. Meeting transcripts also will be placed on

the NRC’s homepage when a special web site for the panel is created.
Formal procedures for the conduct of the panel meeting will be developed at the July 28

meeting. Pending their adoption, oral or written views may be presented by members of the

public, including members of the nuclear industry, at this first session.

Those seeking information on opportunities to present oral statements or on schedule

changes, should contact Frank Gillespie at (301) 415-1004, or Mohan Thadani at (301) 415-

1476.

The panel includes NRC staff from headquarters and regional offices and a

representative of NEI, as well as representatives from participating licensees, the Union of

Concerned Scientists, and the Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety.

At the end of the pilot program, which began May 30, the panel will prepare a written

report containing the consensus view of the panel, along with any dissenting views. The NRC

staff will use the report to consider whether any changes to the new oversight program would

be advisable before it is fully implemented next year.

##
#### § 111.26 Interference with examination of records.

Except in accordance with the provisions of part 163 of this chapter, a broker must not refuse access to, conceal, remove, or destroy the whole or any part of any record relating to his transactions as a broker which is being sought, or which the broker has reasonable grounds to believe may be sought, by the Department of Homeland Security or any representative of the Department of Homeland Security, nor may he otherwise interfere, or attempt to interfere, with any proper and lawful efforts to procure or reproduce information contained in those records.
#### § 7.910 What is the purpose of the Age Discrimination Act of 1975?

The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (the “Act”), as amended, is designed to prohibit discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance. The Act also permits federally-assisted programs or activities, and recipients of Federal funds, to continue to use certain age distinctions and factors other than age which meet the requirements of the Act and this regulation.

[55 FR 23078, June 6, 1990, as amended at 68 FR 51380, Aug. 26, 2003]
Dear Mr. Hagl er :

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA−2015− 3281 )

. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to

proce ed without this manual and remove closed

- set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

- proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 12/7/15 . I f we do not receive the
information

, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

- 4549

.

Sincerely,

/s/
Michael J. Cameron Program Analyst
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Michael B. Wheeler, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31,2007 of Tufco Technologies, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: February 14, 2008         /s/ Michael B. Wheeler   Michael B. Wheeler   Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
§ 122.184 Change of identification; change in circumstances of employee; additional employer responsibilities. ( a ) *Change of identification.* The Customs access seal may be removed from the employee by the port director where, for security reasons, a change in the nature of the identification card or other medium on which it appears is necessary.
( b ) *Change in circumstances of employee.* If, after issuance of a Customs access seal to an employee, any circumstance arises (for example, an arrest or conviction for a disqualifying offense) that constitutes a ground for denial of access to the Customs security area under § 122.183(a) or for revocation or suspension of access to the Customs security area and surrender of the Customs access seal under § 122.187(a), the employee must within 24 hours advise the port director in writing of that change in circumstance. In the case of an arrest or prosecution for a disqualifying offense listed in § 122.183(a)(4), the employee also must within 5 calendar days advise the port director in writing of the final disposition of that arrest or prosecution. In addition, if an airport operator or an aircraft operator suspends an employee's unescorted access authority to a Security Identification Display Area pursuant to regulations promulgated by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration or other appropriate government agency and the employee also has an approved Customs access seal, the employee must within 24 hours advise the port director in writing of the fact of, and basis for, the suspension.
( c ) *Additional employer responsibilities.* If an employer becomes aware of any change in the circumstances of its employee as described in paragraph (b) of this section, the employer must immediately advise the port director of that fact even though the employee may have separately reported that fact to the port director under paragraph (b) of this section. In addition, each employer must submit to the port director during the first month of each calendar quarter a report setting forth a current list of all its employees who have an approved Customs access seal. The quarterly report must list separately all additions to, and deletions from, the previous quarterly report. Moreover, each employer must take appropriate steps to ensure that an employee uses an approved Customs access seal only in connection with activities relating to his employment.
[T.D. 02-40, 67 FR 48986, July 29, 2002; 67 FR 51928, Aug. 9, 2002]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40882

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY MORALES, also known as

Johnny Anthony Morales,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-97-CR-75-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 10, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Johnny Morales, whose real name is Enrique Sifuentes-Garcia,

appeals his sentence following conviction for possession with

intent to distribute marijuana. He argues that his use of an

alias until just prior to sentencing was not a sufficient basis

for application of the sentencing enhancement pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1. Morales’ conduct falls within the range of

conduct to which that enhancement may be applied. See United

States v. McDonald, 964 F.2d 390, 392-93 (5th Cir. 1992). The 
No. 97-40882

-2-

district court’s factual findings regarding his use of an alias

are not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Cisneros, 112

F.3d 1272, 1279 (5th Cir. 1997). 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S Biomedical Corp. (Formerly United
Textiles & Toys Corp.) (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned, being, Ilan Arbel, President of the Company, and
Aileen Goode, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectfully, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Ilan Arbel                                         /s/ Aileen Goode
------------------------                               -----------------------
Ilan Arbel                                             Aileen Goode
President                                              Chief Financial Officer
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-204 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, November 9, 1998)

NRC PREHEARING CONFERENCE SCHEDULED

FOR YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION

An Atomic Safety and Licensing Board has scheduled a prehearing conference

December 16 in Greenfield, Massachusetts, in a licensing proceeding concerning the

decommissioning of Yankee Atomic Electric Company’s nuclear power station near Rowe,

Massachusetts. The Yankee facility permanently ceased operation in 1991.

The conference, which is open to the public, will begin at 9:00 a.m. at the Grand Jury

Room (top floor) of the Franklin County Courthouse, 425 Main Street, Greenfield, MA. If

necessary, the proceeding will continue on Thursday and Friday, December 17 and 18,

beginning at 9:00 a.m. each day, at the same location.

Licensing boards frequently schedule a prehearing conference of the parties in a

proceeding to consider whether a public hearing should be granted. At the forthcoming

conference, the board will consider the admissibility of contentions raised by the New England

Coalition on Nuclear Pollution, Inc. and the Citizens Awareness Network, which requested a

hearing on the unfinished portion of work to be completed under the Yankee decommissioning

plan. The conference will also consider petitions, if any, from interested states or governmental

organizations and to the extent necessary, will consider discovery and future schedules for

various aspects of the proceeding.

Written statements and requests for oral statements, should be submitted to the Office

of the Secretary, Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20555. Documents relating to this application are on file at the Local Public

Document Room, located at the Greenfield Community College, 1 College Drive, Greenfield,

MA 01301, as well as at the Commission’s Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120

L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037.

Members of the Licensing Board are the following Administrative Judges from the

NRC’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel: Charles Bechhoefer, Chairman; Dr. Thomas

S. Elleman and Thomas D. Murphy.

##
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

N0. 98-03 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, January 9, 1998)

NRC LICENSING BOARD TO HOLD PREHEARING CONFERENCE

ON PROPOSED SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL STORAGE FACILITY IN UTAH

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board has

scheduled a prehearing conference beginning January 27 in Salt Lake City on the

application of Private Fuel Storage Limited Liability Company (PFS) to possess and

store spent nuclear reactor fuel in a facility located on the Skull Valley Goshute Indian

Reservation in Skull Valley, Utah, about 85 miles southwest of Salt Lake City.

The prehearing conference, which is open to the public for observation, will begin

at 10:00 a.m. MST in the Moot Courtroom of the University of Utah College of Law, 332

South 1400 East, Salt Lake City. It will continue, until completed, at the same location,

subsequently beginning each day at 9:00 a.m., for several days if needed.

The NRC received petitions for a hearing or to be made a party to any hearing

that is held from the following: the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians; Ohngo

Gaudadeh Devia; Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation and David Pete;

Castle Rock Land and Livestock, L.C., Skull Valley Company, LTD., and Ensign

Ranches of Utah, L.C.; and the State of Utah.

During the prehearing conference, the Licensing Board will hear arguments on

whether petitioners who are seeking a hearing have formal legal standing to be heard

and whether the contentions various petitioners have submitted are admissible. In

ruling on the petitions, the Licensing Board will consider the nature of each petitioner’s

right under the Atomic Energy Act to be made a party to the proceeding; the nature and

extent of the petitioner’s property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and the

possible effect of any order that may be entered in the proceeding on the petitioner’s

interest.

If any of the petitioners subsequently is found to have standing and to have

submitted one or more litigable contentions, the Board will conduct a hearing on those

contentions at a later time. If a hearing is held, the Board will provide an opportunity for

members of the public to submit written comments or, if appropriate, to make brief oral

presentations (known as “oral limited appearance statements”) on the issues.
Licensing Board members are G. Paul Bollwerk, III, Chairman; Dr. Jerry R.

Kline; and Dr. Peter S. Lam.

###

(NOTE TO EDITORS: The use of tape recorders and cameras in the prehearing

conference room is permitted, as long as their physical installation and presence does

not interfere with the proceeding, subject to the following conditions: cameras must

remain stationary in a designated area, no additional lighting is permitted, and no

additional microphones will be permitted outside the designated camera area.)
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-145 November 7, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci, (610)337-5330 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

STATUS OF IMPROVEMENTS TO CALVERT CLIFFS RADIATION SAFETY

PROGRAM

WILL BE THE SUBJECT OF NOVEMBER 13 MEETING BETWEEN NRC, BG&E

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff and officials of the

Baltimore Gas & Electric Company will meet on Thursday,

November 13, to review the status of improvements to the

Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant’s radiation safety

program. BG&E owns and operates the two-reactor facility.

The meeting will begin at 1 p.m. at the plant, located

at 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway, Lusby, Md. It will be open

to the public for observation.

In August, the NRC proposed a $176,000 fine against BG&E

for three violations of agency requirements stemming from

inadequate control of diving activities in the Unit 2 spent

fuel pool at Calvert Cliffs. In addition, the NRC cited, but

did not propose a fine, for 10 other violations involving

other inadequate radiological controls.

In response to the violations, BG&E committed to making

improvements in the plant’s radiation safety program,

including tighter controls over the use of divers.

#
ig°
42°30'
ALBANIA
relief map

42°

41°30'
41°

40°30"

[Legend

© Capital of Albania
@® Districts Capitals

Rivers

Digital Elevation Model

im High : 2751
—_ Low : 0
~

a) 10 20 40

ig°

19°30"

60
Kilometers

19°30’
2

20°30" 21°

42°30' 4

420 af

41°30' 4

419 4

40°30" 4

ise?

“=}USAID | ALBANIA

Produced by GIS Unit, March 2007

20°30' 21°
n n