alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 10.35**

 

Directors who are not employees of Midas, Inc. or any of its affiliated companies (the “Company”) receive anannual retainer of $25,000, plus $1,000 for each meeting of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) and each Board Committee meeting attended by such director. The Chairperson of each Board Committee is paid an additional$5,000 annual retainer. In addition, each non-employee director is granted an Annual Director Restricted Stock Award pursuant to the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan. Each Annual Director Restricted Stock Award consists of 1,000 restricted sharesof the Company’s Common Stock. These restricted shares become exercisable in equal annual installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant. In the event of a Change in Control, as defined in the Company’s StockIncentive Plan, each restricted share will vest and, in certain cases, will be settled in cash by Midas. 

 

In addition to the fees described above, Robert R. Schoeberl, as compensation for his services as Midas’ non-executive Chairman of the Board,receives an annual supplemental director fee in the amount of $25,000 per year.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-96-53 September 12, 1996

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO CONDUCT SPECIAL TEAM INSPECTION

OF SEPT. 6 SHUTDOWN AT CLINTON POWER STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is conducting a special

team inspection at the Clinton Power Station to review the

circumstances surrounding a reactor shutdown on September 6

because of a leaking pump in the reactor cooling system.

The plant, which is located near Clinton, Illinois, is

operated by Illinois Power Company.

An additional NRC team inspection will begin shortly to

review control room activities at the plant.

In the September 6 shutdown, the cooling water leakage was

through the seals on a recirculation pump. The leaking water was

collected in a drain system in the reactor containment, and there

was no release of radioactivity to the environment.

The recirculation pump -- one of two such pumps -- increases

the flow of water through the reactor and increases the reactor's

thermal efficiency.

The current NRC inspection is focusing on the decisions and

actions of reactor operators as they monitored the increasing

leakage through the pump seal and attempted to control it. Some

of the steps taken by the operators may not have been covered by

existing plant procedures.

NRC license requirements provide that the plant be shut down

if the leakage exceeds 5 gallons per minute and cannot be reduced

within 4 hours. The reactor operators attempted to reduce the

leakage by closing various valves. The leakage remained above

the limit, and the plant was subsequently shut down.

The four-person special inspection team is expected to

complete its onsite review Friday. It will issue a written

report in several weeks. The report will be publicly available.

####
§ 306.6 Application requirements. ( a ) EDA will provide Investment Assistance under this subpart for the period of time required to complete the Project's scope of work, as specifically outlined in the applicable FFO.
( b ) For a Project of significant Regional or national scope, EDA may waive the requirement set forth in § 301.2(b) of this chapter that the non-profit organization act in cooperation with officials of a political subdivision of a State.
( c ) The Investment Rate for Investments under this subpart shall be determined in accordance with § 301.4(b)(4) of this chapter.
( d ) At least 80 percent of EDA funding must be allocated to direct costs of program delivery.
[71 FR 56675, Sept. 27, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 76132, Dec. 19, 2014]
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

DOUGLAS MAX BOLDT, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 23-0368 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Yavapai County

No. P1300CR20010395

The Honorable Debra R. Phelan, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Yavapai County Attorney’s Office, Prescott

By Jason Nunez

Counsel for Respondent

Douglas Max Boldt, Florence

Petitioner

FILED 2-6-2024
STATE v. BOLDT

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Andrew M. Jacobs, Judge Jennifer M. Perkins, and Judge 

David D. Weinzweig delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Douglas Boldt seeks review of the superior court’s 

order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to 

Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is Boldt’s tenth petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s burden 

to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App.

2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find the petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. 

¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
### **CHAPTER 19—CONGRESSIONAL AWARD PROGRAM**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—CONGRESSIONAL AWARD PROGRAM

Sec.
801.
Establishment, etc., of Congressional Award Board.
802.
Program.
803.
Board organization.
804.
Administration.
805.
Regional award directors of program; appointment criteria.
806.
Powers, functions, and limitations.
807.
Audits.
808.
Termination.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—CONGRESSIONAL RECOGNITION FOR EXCELLENCE IN ARTS EDUCATION

811 to 817c. Omitted.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-01 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Tuesday, January 5, 1999)

NRC RECEIVES REQUEST FROM CP&L FOR USE OF ADDITIONAL HARRIS

PLANT SPENT FUEL POOLS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received a request from Carolina Power & Light

Company (CP&L) to double the amount of spent nuclear fuel pool storage capacity at the

Shearon Harris nuclear power plant, 21 miles southwest of Raleigh, N.C.

The plant was originally designed for four units, but only one was completed. However,

the plant’s fuel handling building has four spent fuel pools, as originally planned. The

current Harris license authorizes CP&L to use two of those pools for spent fuel from the

Harris plant and from the company’s other two nuclear plants, Brunswick, near Southport,

N.C., and H.B. Robinson, near Hartsville, S.C.

CP&L is seeking authorization for the use of the remaining two spent fuel pools through

an amendment to the Harris license. The NRC staff will carefully review the company’s

application, including analyses of changes to the cooling systems for the additional pools,

before acting on the request. Interested parties have 30 days after the notice of the

application is published in the Federal Register to petition the NRC for a hearing on the

license amendment.

#
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 364/2004 of 25 February 2004 as regards the extension of its scope to include aid for research and development

(2006/C 3/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----
§ 113.68 Wool and fur products labeling acts and fiber products identification act bond conditions. A bond to comply with wool and fur products labeling acts and fiber products identification act must contain the conditions listed in this section and must be a single transaction bond. Wool and Fur Products Labeling Acts and Fiber Products Identification Act ( a ) If the principal obtains release from CBP custody of any wool or fur product (hereafter “merchandise”) that is subject to the provisions of the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939, the Fur Products Labeling Act, or the Fiber Products Identification Act, the principal guarantees that the merchandise complies with every provision of those Acts, as applicable.
( b ) If any of the released merchandise does not comply with each applicable provision of the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939, the Fur Products Labeling Act, or the Fiber Products Identification Act, the obligors (principal or surety, jointly and severally) agree to pay liquidated damages equal to two times the value of the merchandise involved in the default and duty thereon. It is understood and agreed that the amount to be collected under this condition will be based upon the quantity and value of the merchandise as determined by CBP. Value as used in these provisions means value as determined under 19 U.S.C. 1401a.
[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984, as amended by T.D. 88-72, 53 FR 45902, Nov. 15, 1988; CBP Dec. 15-15, 80 FR 70169, Nov. 13, 2015]
### §1652. State laws as rules of decision

The laws of the several states, except where the Constitution or treaties of the United States or Acts of Congress otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in civil actions in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 944.)

#### Historical Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §725 (R.S. §721).

"Civil actions" was substituted for "trials at common law" to clarify the meaning of the Rules of Decision Act in the light of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Such Act has been held to apply to suits in equity.

Changes were made in phraseology.
### §25a. Delegate to House of Representatives from District of Columbia

(a) The people of the District of Columbia shall be represented in the House of Representatives by a Delegate, to be known as the "Delegate to the House of Representatives from the District of Columbia", who shall be elected by the voters of the District of Columbia in accordance with the District of Columbia Election Act. The Delegate shall have a seat in the House of Representatives, with the right of debate, but not of voting, shall have all the privileges granted a Representative by section 6 of Article I of the Constitution, and shall be subject to the same restrictions and regulations as are imposed by law or rules on Representatives. The Delegate shall be elected to serve during each Congress.

(b) No individual may hold the office of Delegate to the House of Representatives from the District of Columbia unless on the date of his election—

(1) he is a qualified elector (as that term is defined in section 2(2) of the District of Columbia Election Act) of the District of Columbia;

(2) he is at least twenty-five years of age;

(3) he holds no other paid public office; and

(4) he has resided in the District of Columbia continuously since the beginning of the three-year period ending on such date.

He shall forfeit his office upon failure to maintain the qualifications required by this subsection.

(Pub. L. 91–405, title II, §202, Sept. 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 848.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The District of Columbia Election Act, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b)(1), is act Aug. 12, 1955, ch. 862, 69 Stat. 699, which is not classified to the Code.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 91–405, title II, §206(b), Sept. 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 855, provided that: "This title and the amendments made by this title [enacting this section and section 25b of this title and amending section 2106 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, sections 4342, 6954, and 9342 of Title 10, Armed Forces, sections 201, 203, 204, 591, 594, and 595 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 10307 of Title 52, Voting and Elections] shall take effect on the date of its enactment [Sept. 22, 1970]."
#### § 6.8 Subpoena and other legal demands.

Access to records in systems of records by subpoena or other legal process shall be in accordance with the provisions of part 5 of this chapter.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify that
the foregoing Annual Report of Claimsnet.com inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period
ending December 31, 2004 (the Report):  (1)
    Fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    Fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
condition and consolidated result of operations of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Report. /s/ Don Crosbie Don Crosbie
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 16, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to this Report pursuant to Item 601(b)
(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, Unites States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed
as part of this Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 60
### §331. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 331 was editorially reclassified as section 4533 of this title.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-134 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-91673 of PNV Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-8 of our report dated September
25, 2000 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
paragraph relating to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern),
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PNV Inc. for the year ended
June 30, 2000.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Certified Public Accountants

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
September 27, 2000
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 97-39 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson July 10, 1997

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

E-MAIL: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC, OPPD TO MEET FOR DISCUSSION OF APPARENT VIOLATIONS

AT FORT CALHOUN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold two predecisional

enforcement conferences in July with officials of Omaha Public Power District, the

operator of Fort Calhoun Station, a nuclear power plant near Fort Calhoun, Nebraska.

The first conference will be held on Monday, July 14 beginning at 1 p.m. The

second will take place one week later on Monday, July 21 beginning at

10:30 a.m. Both meetings will be held in NRC Region IV offices in Arlington, Texas.

The meetings will be open to public observation; NRC officials will be available

afterwards for questions.

The apparent violations to be discussed in the July 14 conference were identified

during inspections held between April 14 and May 2 of this year, and involve six

instances where fire protection program requirements appear not to have been met.

The apparent violations include diesel generator control circuits that were not

protected from fire, an inadequate alternate shutdown procedure in case of fire in a

cable spreading room, an inadequate water curtain to prevent fire from spreading

between fire protection areas, an inadequate reactor coolant pump motor lube oil

collection system, inadequate control of fire pump operations, and a training

requirement for fire brigade members that was not performed.

The July 21 conference will address an apparent violation identified during an

inspection conducted between April 23 and June 10 of this year following the rupture of

a large steam line and subsequent plant shutdown. Inspectors determined that there

were apparent shortcomings in the program to monitor the condition of large steam

piping. These shortcomings contributed to the failure to detect erosion and wear,

leading to the pipe rupture. The large steam leak caused a plant transient that

presented a significant challenge to the plant operators and posed a major personnel

hazard.
The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean

that NRC has made a final determination that violations did occur or that enforcement

action, such as a monetary fine, will be taken. The purpose is to discuss the apparent

violations, their causes and safety significance, and to provide OPPD officials an

opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection

report and present corrective actions that have been taken.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action

will be made at this conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later time.

###
§ 73.2 Definitions. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, the definitions set forth in part 59 of this subchapter are applicable to this part.
( b ) For the purpose of this part a *duly constituted State or local zoning authority or other authorized public body* means an official or body authorized under State or local law to declare a structure to be in violation of a law, regulation or ordinance.
( c ) For the purpose of this part, *State or local laws, regulations or ordinances intended to discourage or restrict development or occupancy of flood-prone areas* are measures such as those defined as *Flood plain management regulations* in § 59.1 of this subchapter. Such measures are referred to in this part as State or local flood plain management regulations.
### §130a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 130a was editorially reclassified as section 4504 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.919 Fungible goods and materials. ( a ) *General.* A person claiming that a fungible good or material is an originating good may base the claim either on the physical segregation of the fungible good or material or by using an inventory management method with respect to the fungible good or material. For purposes of this section, the term “inventory management method” means: ( 1 ) Averaging;
( 2 ) “Last-in, first-out;”
( 3 ) “First-in, first-out;” or
( 4 ) Any other method that is recognized in the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles of the Party in which the production is performed or otherwise accepted by that country.
( b ) *Duration of use.* A person selecting an inventory management method under paragraph (a) of this section for a particular fungible good or material must continue to use that method for that fungible good or material throughout the fiscal year of that person.
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.1208 Response to an appeal petition. ( a ) *Who may respond.* SBA may respond to an appeal as determined in its discretion, but SBA is not required to respond. If SBA elects not to respond, such election shall not be interpreted as an admission or waiver of any allegation of law or fact. In addition, after review of the appeal petition, OHA may request SBA to respond for good cause shown by OHA. Only SBA may respond. If filed, the response should set forth the relevant facts and legal arguments to the issues presented on appeal.
( b ) *Time limit.* If an SBA response is filed, it must be filed within 45 calendar days after issuance of the Notice and Order.
( c ) *Close of record.* The record will close 45 calendar days from the issuance of the Notice and Order, unless the Judge decides otherwise. Generally, filings after the close of record will not be considered.
( d ) *Service.* If a response is filed, the SBA must file its response with OHA, and serve a copy of the response upon the appellant or its attorney, as applicable by utilizing the OHA Case Portal.
( e ) *Reply to response.* Generally, a reply to a response is not permitted unless the Judge directs otherwise. *See* § 134.206(e). However, upon motion (*see* § 134.211), and under terms needed to avoid prejudice to any non-moving party, the Judge may permit the filing and service of a supplemental pleading after review of SBA's response and/or the administrative record. The proposed supplemental pleading must be filed and served with the motion utilizing the OHA Case Portal.
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.104 Temporary importation entries for United States Government agencies.

The entry of articles brought into the United States temporarily by an agency or office of the United States Government and claimed to be exempt from duty under Chapter 98, Subchapter XIII, Heading 9813, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), shall be made on Customs Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent. No bond shall be required if the agency or office files a stipulation in the form set forth in § 141.102(d) of this chapter. In those cases in which the provisions of Chapter 98, Subchapter XIII, HTSUS (19 U.S.C. 1202), are not met, however, the Center director will proceed as if a bond had been filed to cover the particular importation. Articles temporarily imported by a Government agency or office under this section are entitled to immediate delivery under the procedures set forth in § 10.101.

[T.D. 77-23, 42 FR 2311, Jan. 11, 1977, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51251, Dec. 21, 1988; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61284, Oct. 13, 2015]
| **Recommended Viewing**

  Our partnership shares the exciting discoveries and knowledge from NASA Sun-EarthConnection missions and research programs with educators, students, andthe general public.  The Sun-Earth Connection Education Forum (SECEF) partnership brings together the richexpertise of scientists, educators, and museums to develop innovativeproducts and programs.
Our goal is to increase science literacy and focus attention on theactive Sun and its effects on Earth.Responsible NASA official: Jim ThiemanWebmaster: Lori Ann PersichittiContacts: The Forum Page
NASA Privacy Statement |   NASA IT Security Warning Banner |  Web Site Accessibility Statement |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|