alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 0:20-cv-61241-RUIZ

APRIL HICKS,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF FILING EXCERPTS OF PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION 

REGARDING HER PREVIOUS TESTIMONY OF THE ACCIDENT

Defendant, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United 

States Attorney, and in accordance with the Court’s directive on January 24, 2022, during the trial 

in liability on this matter, hereby files excerpts from the deposition of Plaintiff, April Hicks, 

regarding her prior version of how the subject accident occurred. 

Dated: January 25, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 

By: Mary Beth Ricke 

Monica L. Haddad 

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Florida Bar No. 99426

Email: Monica.Haddad@usdoj.gov

U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Florida

500 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Telephone: (561) 209-1004

Mary Beth Ricke 

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Florida Bar No. 107213 

Case 0:20-cv-61241-RAR Document 90 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/25/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

E-mail: Mary.Ricke@usdoj.gov

500 East Broward Blvd., Suite 700 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 

Telephone: (954) 660-5137 

Counsel for Defendant, United States of America

Case 0:20-cv-61241-RAR Document 90 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/25/2022 Page 2 of 2
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-99-09 March 23, 1999

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO MEET MARCH 25 WITH ILLINOIS POWER CO. OFFICIALS

ON RESTART ACTIVITIES AT CLINTON NUCLEAR PLANT

** Regional Administrator to Hold News Briefing at 12:15 p.m. **

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

Illinois Power Company officials on Thursday (March 25) to

discuss activities leading to the restart of the Clinton Nuclear

Power Station. The plant is located near Clinton, Illinois.

NRC Regional Administrator James Dyer will meet news media

representatives at 12:15 p.m., prior to the meeting, to discuss

the NRC's monitoring of ongoing work at the plant.

The meeting and news briefing will be in the utility's

Energy and Environmental Center on Illinois Highway 54 east of

Clinton, Illinois. The meeting will begin at 1 p.m.

The meeting is open to public observation. NRC staff

members will be available following the meeting for questions and

comments from the public and news media.

This is the second of three meetings planned between the NRC

staff and utility officials to discuss the resumption of

operation at the Clinton plant, which has been shut down since

September 1996. One meeting was held March 18, and the next

meeting will be scheduled for next month.

James Dyer became Region III Regional Administrator in

February. He previously was Deputy Regional Administrator in the

NRC's Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. He has been with the

NRC since 1983.

#####
### §782. Compensation of National Council members

#### (a) Rate

Members of the National Council shall be entitled to receive compensation at a rate equal to the rate of pay for level 4 of the Senior Executive Service Schedule under section 5382 of title 5, including travel time, for each day they are engaged in the performance of their duties as members of the National Council.

#### (b) Full-time officers or employees of United States

Members of the National Council who are full-time officers or employees of the United States shall receive no additional pay on account of their service on the National Council except for compensation for travel expenses as provided under subsection (c) of this section.

#### (c) Travel expenses

While away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services for the National Council, members of the National Council shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, in the same manner as persons employed intermittently in the Government service are allowed expenses under section 5703 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 93–112, title IV, §402, as added Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, §407, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1200.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 782, Pub. L. 93–112, title IV, §402, as added Pub. L. 95–602, title I, §117, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2978; amended Pub. L. 100–630, title II, §205(d), Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3310; Pub. L. 102–569, title IV, §403, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4423, related to compensation of National Council members, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 105–220.

Another prior section 782, Pub. L. 93–112, title IV, §402, Sept. 26, 1973, 87 Stat. 387, authorized the Secretary to obtain information from Federal agencies, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 95–602, §117.
#### § 113.0 Scope.

This part sets forth the general requirements applicable to bonds. It contains the general authority and powers of the Commissioner of CBP in requiring bonds, bond approval and execution, bond conditions, general and special bond requirements, the requirements which must be met to be either a principal or a surety, the requirements concerning the production of documents, the authority and manner of assessing liquidated damages and requirements for cancelling the bond or charges against a bond.

[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-15, 80 FR 70162, Nov. 13, 2015]
|   | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Trust Certificates (TRUCs), Series 2001-2 Trust; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the trust agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and the trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                                   |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Anthony J. Horan                                                              |   |
|   |   | Name: Anthony J. Horan                                                            |   |
|   |   | Title:   Chief Executive Officer/President, Bear Stearns Depositor Inc. |   |
|   |   | Date:   March  18, 2015                                       |   |

----
#### § 6.72 Effective date of new system of records or alteration of an existing system of records.

Systems of records proposed to be established or altered in accordance with the provisions of this subpart shall be effective no sooner than 30 calendar days from the publication of the notice required by § 6.71.
----

CALL FOR PROPOSALS — DG INFSO — MEDIA 14/2005

MEDIA PLUS

Support for the transnational distribution of European films and audiovisual works on video (VHS and DVD)

(2005/C 329/12)

1.   Objectives and description

This call for proposals is based on Council Decision 2000/821/EC on the implementation of a programme encouraging the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works (Media Plus — Development, distribution and promotion 2001 — 2006), adopted by the Council on 20 December 2000 and published in the Official Journal of the European Communities on 17 January 2001 (OJ L 13, pages 34-43). The proposition to prolong the MEDIA Program until 31 December 2006 was approved by the Council of Ministers on 26 April 2004.

In the distribution sector, the objective of the programme is to strengthen the distribution sector for European works on video intended for private use, by encouraging publishers to invest in digital technology and the promotion of non-domestic European works.

2.   Eligible applicants

This notice is intended for European video and DVD publishers whose activities contribute to the attainment of the above objectives, in particular to publishers of works on video for private use.

Applicants must be established in one of the following countries:

3.   Budget and duration of projects

The potential fund available to each publisher is determined on the basis of the market performance by the publisher in the reference years (2004-2005). Under any circumstances the fund allocated to one company may not exceed EUR 150 000.

The financial assistance from the Commission per project will amount to a minimum of EUR 1 000 but may in no case exceed 50 % of the total eligible costs of the presented reinvestment project.

The maximum duration of the projects is 6 months.

4.   Deadline for submission of applications

Applications must be submitted to the Commission by no later than 15 April 2006.

5.   Full details

The full text of the call for proposals, together with the application forms, can be found at the following Internet address:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/avpolicy/media/distr_en.html.

Applications must comply with all the terms of the guidelines and be submitted on the forms provided.

----
July 30, 2012 

Mr. Kevin Adams 

Industry Economist 

US Department of Transportation 

Dear Mr. Adams: 

2811A L;\J'rport Blvd. South 

Meridian, MS 39307 

p. 601.482.0364 f. 601.482.5899 

!_YWW.m~ridianairport.com 

www .meridianaviation.aero 

First I want to thank Silver Airways for revising the proposed flight schedule to Meridian under their EAS 

proposal. This schedule will meet the needs of the majority of our passengers. I have discussed this 

revision with the Airport Authority and Mayor and feel this will provide the best air service Meridian can 

hope for in the current environment. 

Thank you for your help through this process. 

Sincerely, 

~ / >~ u-£~/ur_____ / 

Tom Williams 

President 

Aircraft Maintenance & Parts
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-86 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, June 17, 1996)

WEBER RECEIVES 'EXEMPLARY ACHIEVEMENT' AWARD

Michael F. Weber, a branch chief at the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, has received the 1996 William A. Jump Award for

Exemplary Achievement in Public Administration, given annually

for outstanding performance in the Federal service.

He was selected for this year's award by the William A. Jump

Memorial Foundation in recognition of his sustained, high caliber

managerial performance in the regulation of low-level radioactive

waste and decommissioning of nuclear facilities. The Jump Award

was established in 1950 to recognize exemplary service by younger

staff members of Federal agencies.

The presentation was made at the recent annual awards

ceremony at the Department of Agriculture in Washington.

Mr. Weber has been chief of the NRC Low-Level Waste and

Decommissioning Projects Branch, Division of Waste Management,

since March 1995. A graduate of Pennsylvania State University,

he joined NRC in 1982 as a hydrogeologist, and was a technical

assistant to the NRC Chairman from 1989 to 1991. He received

NRC's Meritorious Service Award for Scientific Excellence in

1993.

#
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.883 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, Ronald D. Mogel, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services
Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: August 26, 2010



/s/    RONALD D.
MOGELRonald D. Mogel
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
### §§52, 53. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–607, ch. V, §506(k)(7), formerly §506(h)(7), Oct. 31, 1972, 86 Stat. 1508, redesignated §506(i)(7), Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §108(a), Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 773, redesignated §506(j)(7), Pub. L. 96–304, title I, §101, July 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 889, redesignated §506(k)(7), Pub. L. 97–276, §101(e), Oct. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 1189

Section 52, Pub. L. 92–184, ch. IV, Dec. 15, 1971, 85 Stat. 634, provided for office space for Senators in their home states. See section 6314 of this title.

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriations acts:

June 27, 1956, ch. 453, 70 Stat. 359, as amended Pub. L. 89–211, §1(b), Sept. 29, 1965, 79 Stat. 857.

Aug. 5, 1955, ch. 568, 69 Stat. 504.

July 2, 1954, ch. 455, title I, 68 Stat. 399.

Aug. 1, 1953, ch. 304, title I, 67 Stat. 321.

July 9, 1952, ch. 598, 66 Stat. 466.

Oct. 11, 1951, ch. 485, 65 Stat. 391.

Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, Ch. II, 64 Stat. 597.

June 22, 1949, ch. 235, 63 Stat. 219.

June 14, 1948, ch. 467, 62 Stat. 425.

Section 53, Pub. L. 92–184, ch. IV, Dec. 15, 1971, 85 Stat. 634, provided for payment of office expenses of Senators in their home states. See section 6314 of this title.

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriations acts:

June 27, 1956, ch. 453, 70 Stat. 359, as amended Pub. L. 89–90, July 27, 1965, 79 Stat. 269; Pub. L. 91–145, Dec. 12, 1969, 83 Stat. 343.

Aug. 5, 1955, ch. 568, 69 Stat. 504.

July 2, 1954, ch. 455, title I, 68 Stat. 399.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 92–607, ch. V, §506(k), formerly §506(h), Oct. 31, 1972, 86 Stat. 1507, redesignated §506(i) by Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §108(a), Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 773, redesignated §506(j) by Pub. L. 96–304, title I, §101, July 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 889, and redesignated §506(k) by Pub. L. 97–276, §101(e), Oct. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 1189, provided that the repeal is effective Jan. 1, 1973.
#### Marjorie S. York, as Administratrix of the Estate of Harold Sampson, Deceased, Respondent, v. New York State Electric & Gas Corporation et al., Appellants.

Same decision and like cause of action as in companion ease of *Young*v. *New York State Electric & Gas Corp. (ante,*p. 939, decided herewith.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Larkin, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 4.1.13    
  



	PREFERRED STOCK

NUMBER	 	PREFERRED STOCK

SHARES








  


INCORPORATED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 


STRATUS
SERVICES GROUP, INC. 


50,000
SHARES SERIES H PREFERRED STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 


This
Certifies that 


is
the owner of 


FULLY
PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE CAPITAL STOCK 


OF
THE ABOVE NAMED CORPORATION 


transferable
on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed this        day of
                    A.D. 20    


[STRATUS
SERVICES GROUP, INC. Corporate Seal] 



	/s/ MICHAEL A. MALTZMAN

TREASURER	 	/s/ JOSEPH J.RAYMOND

CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER







 
 

EXPLANATION OF ABBREVIATIONS    
  


        The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as if they were written out in full according to
applicable laws or regulations. Abbreviations, in addition to those appearing below, may be used. 



	JT TEN—as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common	 	TEN ENT—as tenants by the entireties
	

TEN COM—as tenants in common Custodian	
 	

UNIF GIFT MIN ACT—Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
	

 	
 	

CUST—Custodian for
	

 	
 	

UNIF TRANS MIN ACT—Uniform Transfers to Minors Act





FOR
VALUE RECEIVED,                        hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 



	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE	 	 
	

	
 	

 
	

	
 	

 





                                        
                                          
                                       Shares
represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 


                                        
                                          
                                      
Attorney to transfer the said shares on the books to the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 


Dated:                        20    



                            In
the presence of 


                                  X
                                        



                                  X
                                        



CERTIFICATE 


FOR 


SHARES 


OF 


ISSUED
TO 




DATED












QuickLinks


EXHIBIT 4.1.13

EXPLANATION OF ABBREVIATIONS
#### Allen C. Abbott v. P. N. Campbell.

Filed June 3, 1903.

No. 12,867.

1. Verification. A verification of a pleading need not be in the exact words of the statute; it is sufficient if the substance of the statutory requirements is fairly set forth.

2. --. The word “instrument” imports a writing. Hence a verification by an attorney, in an action upon an instrument for the payment of money only, is not defective because it fails to state expressly that the instrument sued on is in writing.

Error to the district court for Loup county: John R. Thompson, District Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Alphonso M. Bobbins,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. 8. Moon*and *Elliott J. Clements3 contra.*

Pound, C.

While we may suspect that the real object of the petition in error is time, its professed purpose is to challenge the sufficiency of the verification of the plaintiff’s peti*372tion; the trial court, having refused to strike such petition from the files, rendered judgment upon defendant’s failure to plead thereto. The petition is verified by an attorney, who sets forth, among other things, that the action is founded “upon a contract for the payment of money only, and such instrument is in my possession.” This verification is objected to because it does not state that the action is founded upon a “written instrument for the payment of money only” as required by section 120 of the code. We see no merit in the objection. A verification of a pleading need not be in the exact words of the statute. It is sufficient if the substance of the statutory requirements is fairly set forth. If there’could be any doubt as to this, sections 1 and 145 of the code should suffice to obviate it. The verification in the case at bar expressly states that the contract for payment of money only, upon which suit is brought, is an “instrument.” But the word “instrument” imports a writing. *Hoag v. Howard,*55 Cal. 564; 16 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law (2d ed.), 824. Hence the verification is not defective because it fails to state expressly that the instrument sued on is written.

We recommend that the judgment be affirmed.

Duffie and Kirkpatrick, CC., concur.

By the Court: For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Felix Back, as Assignee, Judgment-Creditor-Appellant, against Clara E. Wagemann, Judgment-Debtor-Respondent.

Order appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the respondent. The denial of the motion to punish for contempt was proper. (See *Matter of Gill*v. *Schwarts,*273 App. Div. 606; *Bergman*v. *Buechler,*249 App. Div. 553; *Compton & Co.*v. *Williams,*248 App.-Div. 545.) With respect to that part of the order directing a reference as to the matters involved on the cross motion we feel that the facts and circumstances under which the appellant procured an assignment of the judgment should be fully developed. We do not pass upon the merits and express no opinion as to the propriety of the relief sought on the cross motion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.