alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-73 June 25, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH NU, PUBLIC ON MILLSTONE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of Northeast Utilities on Tuesday afternoon, July 1, at

1 p.m. in the Leland F. Sillin Training Center, at the Millstone

site in Waterford, Ct. This is the latest in a series of

periodic meetings to discuss schedules and progress toward

recovery of the Millstone units. Topics will include the status

of restart activities, the ICAVP, and the employee concerns

program. This meeting is open to the public for observation

only.

At 7 p.m, that evening, the NRC staff will update the public

on the status of the Millstone recovery efforts. NRC staff will

present an overview of findings from the most recent NRC

inspection report. NU representatives also will be available to

respond to plant specific issues. The evening meeting will be

held in the Senior Citizen’s Meeting Room at the Municipal

Complex on Route 85 in Waterford.

#
### §169. Positions in Library of Congress exempt from citizenship requirement

From and after October 1, 1983, not to exceed fifteen positions in the Library of Congress may be exempt from the provisions of appropriation Acts concerning the employment of aliens during the current fiscal year, but the Librarian shall not make any appointment to any such position until he has ascertained that he cannot secure for such appointments a person in any of the categories specified in such provisions who possesses the special qualifications for the particular position and also otherwise meets the general requirements for employment in the Library of Congress.

(Pub. L. 98–51, title II, §202, July 14, 1983, 97 Stat. 276.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Oct. 2, 1982, Pub. L. 97–276, §101(e) [S. 2939, title II, §202], 96 Stat. 1189.

Oct. 1, 1981, Pub. L. 97–51, §101(c) [H.R. 4120, title II, §202], 95 Stat. 959.

Dec. 16, 1980, Pub. L. 96–536, §101(c) [H.R. 7593, title II, §202], 94 Stat. 3167.

Oct. 12, 1979, Pub. L. 96–86, §101(c) [H.R. 4390, title II, §202], 93 Stat. 657.

Sept. 30, 1978, Pub. L. 95–391, title II, §202, 92 Stat. 785.

Aug. 5, 1977, Pub. L. 95–94, title II, §202, 91 Stat. 677.

Oct. 1, 1976, Pub. L. 94–440, title VIII, §802, 90 Stat. 1457.

July 25, 1975, Pub. L. 94–59, title VII, §702, 89 Stat. 294.

Aug. 13, 1974, Pub. L. 93–371, 88 Stat. 441.

Nov. 1, 1973, Pub. L. 93–145, 87 Stat. 547.

July 10, 1972, Pub. L. 92–342, 86 Stat. 446.

July 9, 1971, Pub. L. 92–51, 85 Stat. 141.

Aug. 18, 1970, Pub. L. 91–382, 84 Stat. 823.

Dec. 12, 1969, Pub. L. 91–145, 83 Stat. 357.

July 23, 1968, Pub. L. 90–417, 82 Stat. 411.

July 28, 1967, Pub. L. 90–57, 81 Stat. 140.

Aug. 27, 1966, Pub. L. 89–545, 80 Stat. 368.

July 27, 1965, Pub. L. 89–90, 79 Stat. 280.

Aug. 20, 1964, Pub. L. 88–454, 78 Stat. 548.

Dec. 30, 1963, Pub. L. 88–248, 77 Stat. 816.

Oct. 2, 1962, Pub. L. 87–730, 76 Stat. 692.

Aug. 10, 1961, Pub. L. 87–130, 75 Stat. 333.

July 12, 1960, Pub. L. 86–628, 74 Stat. 459.

Aug. 21, 1959, Pub. L. 86–176, 73 Stat. 411.

July 31, 1958, Pub. L. 85–570, 72 Stat. 452.

July 1, 1957, Pub. L. 85–75, 71 Stat. 255.

June 27, 1956, ch. 453, 70 Stat. 368.

Aug. 5, 1955, ch. 568, 69 Stat. 518.

July 2, 1954, ch. 455, 68 Stat. 408.

Aug. 1, 1953, ch. 304, 67 Stat. 330.

July 9, 1952, ch. 598, 66 Stat. 476.

Oct. 11, 1951, ch. 485, 65 Stat. 400.

Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, Ch. II, 64 Stat. 606.

June 22, 1949, ch. 235, 63 Stat. 228.

June 14, 1948, ch. 467, 62 Stat. 434.

July 17, 1947, ch. 262, 61 Stat. 374.

July 1, 1946, ch. 530, 60 Stat. 405.

June 13, 1945, ch. 189, 59 Stat. 256.

June 26, 1944, ch. 277, 58 Stat. 351.

June 28, 1943, ch. 173, 57 Stat. 236.
§ 351.21 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ( a ) Assess NRC nuclear facility (e.g., commercial power plants, fuel processing centers and research reactors) licensee emergency plans for adequacy to protect the health and safety of the public.
( b ) Verify that nuclear facility licensee emergency plans can be adequately implemented (e.g., adequacy and maintenance of equipment, procedures, training, resources, staffing levels and qualifications).
( c ) Review FEMA's findings and determinations of State and local radiological emergency plans for areas surrounding NRC licensed nuclear facilities.
( d ) Take into account the overall state of emergency preparedness in making decisions to issue operating licenses or shut down licensed operating reactors, including the integration of assessments of emergency preparedness onsite by the NRC and offsite by FEMA.
( e ) Where not already established, determine, in cooperation with other Federal agencies, the appropriate planning bases for NRC licensed nuclear facilities including distances, times and radiological characteristics.
( f ) Assist FEMA in developing and promulgating guidance to State and local governments for the preparation of radiological emergency plans.
( g ) Participate with FEMA in assisting State and local governments in developing their radiological emergency plans, evaluating exercises to test plans and evaluating the plans and preparedness.
( h ) Assist FEMA and DOT in the preparation and promulgation of guidance to State and local governments for their use in developing the transportation portions of radiological emergency plans.
( i ) Provide representation to and support for the FRPCC and the RACs.
( j ) Assist FEMA in the development, implementation and maintenance of public information and education programs.
( k ) Assist FEMA with other Federal agencies in the development of representative scenarios from which nuclear facility operators and State and local governments may select for use in testing and exercising radiological emergency plans.
( l ) Assist FEMA in the development of guidance for State and local governments on emergency instrumentation systems for radiation detection and measurement.
( m ) Assist FEMA with the development, implementation and presentation to the extent that resources permit of training programs for Federal, State and local radiological emergency preparedness personnel.
( n ) Assist FEMA in providing guidance and assistance to State and local governments concerning the storage and distribution of radioprotective substances and prophylactic use of drugs (e.g., potassium iodide) to reduce the radiation dose to specific organs as a result of radiological emergencies.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-40457, 333-40459, 333-40461, 333-40333
and 333-43622) of Hypercom Corporation of our report dated July 20, 1999
relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to
Stockholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated July 20, 1999
relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

                                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 26, 2001
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-26 March 12, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC, CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY TO DISCUSS

APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT INDIAN POINT 2 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of the Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant on Friday,

March 14, to discuss apparent violations of agency requirements

at the Buchanan, N.Y., facility. The predecisional enforcement

conference will begin at 9:30 a.m. in the public meeting room at

NRC Region I offices, in King of Prussia, Pa. The session will

be open to the public for observation only. Consolidated Edison

Company (ConEd) operates the plant.

The apparent violations involve two instances in which

protection features were not provided so that one train, or

system, necessary to achieve safe shutdown would be free of

damage in the event of a fire. In addition, the NRC staff found

several instances in which ConEd's response to adverse quality

conditions was insufficient. Specifically, the utility failed to

take adequate measures to determine the cause of each condition

and to launch corrective action to avoid repetition.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference

does not mean the NRC has determined a violation has occurred or

that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety

significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out

any errors that may have been made in NRC inspection reports; and

to enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective

actions.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later time.

#
Promissory Note


$ 54,658.28                                                  September 30, 2002
-----------                                                  ------------------


         On the date  listed  above,  for value  received  Prime  Resource,  LLC
(hereinafter  referred  to as  Borrower)  hereby  promise to pay to the order of
Prime Resource,  LLC (hereinafter  referred to as Holder), at 22 East 100 South,
Suite 400, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 the sum of Fifty Four Thousand Six Hundred
Fifty Eight  Dollars and Twenty Eight Cents  ($54,658.28),  with interest at the
rate of four point  eight six  percent  (4.86%),  in lawful  money of the United
States of America, payable on demand with thirty days written notice.

         In the event of  default,  Borrower(s)  agrees  that the entire  unpaid
balance  hereof  shall  become,  at the  election  of Holder and with  Notice to
Borrower,  accelerated and immediately due and payable; (b) agrees to pay Holder
all lawful collection costs and legal expenses,  including reasonable attorney's
fees,  and (c) agrees that any  payments  from  whatever  source  shall first be
applied to Holder's  collection costs and legal expenses,  second to late charge
fees,  third to interest,  and fourth to principal,  at the option of the Holder
hereof.  Waiver of any default shall not  constitute a waiver of any  subsequent
default.

         Any  payment  not  received  by Holder  within ten (10) days of its due
date,  shall include an eighteen  Percent (18%) late charge fee per month on the
balance due.

         The  maker  and  endorser  of  this  Note   expressly   waives  demand,
preentation for payment,  notice of nonpayment and protest, and suit against the
Maker;  and also  agrees  that  this  Note may be  extended  in whole or in part
without his consent at or after maturity.




/s/ Andrew Limpert
-------------------------------
    Andrew Limpert
122 STAT. 726 PUBLIC LAW 110–213—MAY 7, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3720: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Jan. 22, considered and passed House. 

Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–213 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 424 Clay 

Avenue in Waco, Texas, as the ‘‘Army PFC Juan Alonso Covarrubias Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ARMY PFC JUAN ALONSO COVARRUBIAS POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 424 Clay Avenue in Waco, Texas, shall be known 

and designated as the ‘‘Army PFC Juan Alonso Covarrubias Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Army PFC Juan Alonso Covarrubias Post Office Building’’. 

Approved May 7, 2008. 

May 7, 2008 

[H.R. 3720] 


jbridges on POFP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS
Motion Denied and Order filed June 3 , 2021
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 21
- 00282
- CV

____________ IN RE BASIM MOUSILLI , Relator
On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020
- 496 35



### ORDER
O n May 21, 202 1 , relator Basim Mou silli filed a petition fo r writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appell ate Procedure. S e e T ex . R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A) , 52

. 7 ( a ). To be a “certified or sworn copy,” in accordance with Rule 52, the document must be certified by the trial court clerk or attached to either a properly prepared affidavit or an unsworn declaration per Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 132.001.By this ord er, the court gives relator notice that the petition will be

dismissed unless an a mended petition is filed wi thin ten days of the date of this order t hat addresse s the record issues discussed in In re Kh ol aif , Nos. 1 4

- 20

- 00731

- CV & 14

- 20

- 00732

- CV, 2020 WL 7013339 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 25, 2020, order) and Texas Rules of Appellate Proced ure 5 2.3(k)(1)(A) and 52.7(a). Id; s ee also Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).
Relator also file d a motion for temporary relief p ur suant to Rule 29.3. See T ex. R. App. P. 29.3

. This is not an appeal from an interlocutory order. Id

. Accordingly , the motion is denied without prejudic e to filing a proper motion

.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Bourliot, Poissant and Wilson.
### §5371. Annual budget list

The Secretary shall list, in the annual budget request submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, any funds proposed to be included in funding agreements authorized under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 93–638, title IV, §411, as added Pub. L. 116–180, title I, §101(e), Oct. 21, 2020, 134 Stat. 876.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 5364 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 116–180.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135730 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135730 COA: 272403 Wayne CC: 06-001978-01 GREGORY AUGUSTA POWELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e October 30, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY
, J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the issues raised by new counsel in the defendant ’s motion for reconsideration in that court.

p0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 25, 2008

Clerk
#### Isabelle C. de la Bouillerie v. Anne M. C. de Vienne et al.

Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1052.]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-141 October 23, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC REGARDING MILLSTONE RECOVERY EFFORTS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with the

public on Wednesday, October 29, in Waterford, Conn., to provide

an update on recovery efforts at the Millstone nuclear power

plant. Millstone, located in Waterford, is owned and operated by

Northeast Utilities.

The meeting, the latest in a series of periodic sessions

aimed at keeping the public informed of activities at Millstone,

will begin at 7 p.m. in Waterford Town Hall, at 15 Rope Ferry

Road.

Public comments will be accepted at the meeting.

#
### §179o. Responsibilities and powers of Board

#### (a) In general

The Board shall review nominations of films submitted to it for inclusion in the National Film Registry and consult with the Librarian, as provided in section 179m of this title, with respect to the inclusion of such films in the Registry and the preservation of these and other films that are culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant.

#### (b) Nomination of films

The Board shall consider, for inclusion in the National Film Registry, nominations submitted by the general public as well as representatives of the film industry, such as the guilds and societies representing actors, directors, screenwriters, cinematographers, and other creative artists, producers, and film critics, archives and other film preservation organizations, and representatives of academic institutions with film study programs. The Board shall nominate not more than 25 films each year for inclusion in the Registry.

#### (c) Powers

#### (1) In general

The Board may, for the purpose of carrying out its duties, hold such hearings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such evidence, as the Librarian and the Board consider appropriate.

#### (2) Service on Foundation

Two sitting members of the Board shall be appointed by the Librarian, and shall serve, as Board members of the National Film Preservation Foundation, in accordance with section 151703 of title 36.

(Pub. L. 104–285, title I, §105, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3380.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Section 151703 of title 36" substituted in subsec. (c)(2) for "section 203", meaning section 203 of the National Film Preservation Act of 1996, on authority of Pub. L. 105–225, §5(b), Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1499, the first section of which enacted Title 36, Patriotic and National Observances, Ceremonies, and Organizations.
§ 351.26 The United States Department of Agriculture. ( a ) Assist FEMA in developing and promulgating guidance to State and local governments for the preparation of radiological emergency plans.
( b ) Participate with FEMA in assisting State and local governments in developing their radiological emergency plans, evaluating exercises to test plans and reviewing and evaluating the plans and preparedness.
( c ) Assist State and local governments in preparing to implement protective actions in food ingestion pathway emergency planning zones around fixed nuclear facilities.
( d ) Develop, in coordination with FEMA, the HHS and other Federal agencies, guidance for assisting State and local governments in the production, processing and distribution of food resources under radiological emergency conditions.
( e ) Assist FEMA with the development, implementation and presentation to the extent that resources permit of training programs of Federal, State and local radiological emergency personnel.
( f ) Provide representation to and support for the FRPCC and the RACs.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 00-60416

Summary Calendar

Civil Docket #1:98-CV-191-B-D

_______________________

SHERMAN HALL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICK HAYES; TOMMY WALLACE; CURTIS AUSTIN; THE CITY OF COLUMBUS,

MISSISSIPPI, POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

_________________________________________________________________

May 9, 2001

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:*

Appellant Hall challenges the dismissal without prejudice

of his § 1983 claim against Columbus, Mississippi police officer

Rick Hayes. On appeal, Hall has briefed and argued only the merits

of his claim that Hayes repeatedly arrested and maliciously
2

prosecuted him in order to coerce him to become an informant.

Since the merits were never decided, we cannot rule on his claim.

Hall has not briefed the correctness of the district

court’s dismissal, which occurred because Hall did not show up for

trial, having failed to deposit money to cover costs of his

transportation from prison to attend trial. Nor has Hall briefed

whether the court abused its discretion in denying his motion for

relief from judgment. These issues are waived. Hainze v.

Richards, 207 F.3d 795, 798 (5th Cir. 2000).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF HUSSMANN INTERNATIONAL, INC.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

         Name                                           Place of Incorporation
         ----                                           -----------------------
         <S>                                                   <C>
         Hussmann Corporation                                 Missouri
            Krack Corporation                                 Illinois
            Hussmann International Sales Corporation          Barbados
            Luoyang Hussmann Refrigeration Co. Ltd.*          China
            Refrigeracion Frio Lux S.A.I.                     Chile
            Hussmann Del Peru, S.A.                           Peru
            Chesley Industries, Inc.                          Michigan
            Design & Build Construction, Inc.                 California
            Hussmann Tempcool Holdings PTE Limited*           Singapore
         Whitman Netherlands B.V.                             Netherlands
            Hussmann Mexico Ltda.                             Mexico
            American Refrigeration Products Ltda.             Mexico
            Industrias Frigorificas, S.A. de C.V.             Mexico
            Hussmann Immobiliaria, S.A. de C.V.               Mexico
            Gilmart S.A. de C.V.                              Mexico
            Industrias Gilvert S.A. de C.V.                   Mexico
            Hussmann Refrigeration International B.V.         Netherlands
               Fast Frio do Brasil Ltda.*                     Brazil
               Hussmann Canada Holdings, Ltd.                 Canada
                 Hussmann Canada, Inc.                        Canada
               Hussmann Holdings, Ltd.                        England
                 Hussmann (Europe) Ltd.                       England
                   Hussmann Refrigeration (Hungary) KFT*      Hungary
</TABLE>



     * Each of the above subsidiaries is 100% owned or controlled except as
follows:  Hussmann Tempcool Holdings PTE Limited (50%), Hussmann Fast Frio do
Brasil Ltda. (70%), Hussmann  Refrigeration (Hungary) KFT (60%) and Luoyang
Hussmann Refrigeration Co., Ltd. (55%).