alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 122.79 Shipments to U.S. possessions. ( a ) *Other than Puerto Rico.* An air cargo manifest must be filed for aircraft transporting cargo between the United States and U.S. possessions. Electronic Export Information (EEI) is not required for shipments from the United States or Puerto Rico to the U.S. possessions, except to the U.S. Virgin Islands or from a U.S. possession and destined to the United States, Puerto Rico, or another U.S. possession.
( b ) *Puerto Rico.* When an aircraft carries merchandise on a direct flight from the United States to Puerto Rico, any required air cargo manifest or EEI filing citations, exclusions, and/or exemption legends, must be filed with the appropriate port director Puerto Rico.
[CBP Dec. 17-06, 82 FR 32239, July 13, 2017]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-27 June 26, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH DIABLO CANYON OFFICIALS

TO DISCUSS INSPECTION OF ELECTRICAL FIRE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet June 29 with officials from the

Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant to discuss findings from its special inspection of events

surrounding the May 15 electrical fire and automatic plant shutdown.

The meeting will be held at the PG&E Community Center, 6588 Ontario Rd., San Luis Obispo,

Calif., beginning at 2 p.m. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be

available afterward for questions.

On May 15 an electrical fault led to a fire in a Unit 1 electrical bus. Because certain electrically

powered equipment lost power, the plant’s main generator shut down, followed by the automatic

shutdown of the Unit 1 reactor. There were no injuries from the fire. An NRC special inspection team

was assigned to review the events on May 18.

##
CERTIFICATION OF CEO
               PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Anthony Paterra as CEO of Diasense, Inc., (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
       the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report)
       fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
       or 78o(d); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly
       presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
       and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Anthony Paterra
                                        Anthony Paterra, CEO

                                        January 7, 2005
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Daniel B. Leary, Deceased. Mabel O. Leary et al., Appellants; Adelle H. Land, Respondent.

Decree and order affirmed, with costs.

Memorandum: Insofar as the appeal brings up for review the order of the Surrogate, even had the witness been compelled to answer, in our judgment it would not have changed the result. All concur. (The decree admits a will to probate after trial of issues of fact before Munson, J., and a jury. The order denies contestants’ motion to strike out objections to questions propounded to proponent on an examination before trial and to direct her to answer or claim her privilege.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22922]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-190-04-1610-DS]


Notice of Extension of Comment Period for the Draft Resource 
Management Plan Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement for 
the Clear Creek Management Area

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of extension of comment period for the Draft Resource 
Management Plan Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement 
(Draft RMP/Draft EIS) for the Clear Creek Management Area, Hollister 
Field Office, California.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces an extension of 
the comment period on the Draft RMP/Draft EIS for the Clear Creek 
Management Area. The Original Notice of Availability issued July 19, 
2004 (69FR43011) provided for a comment period to end on October 15, 
2004. BLM is extending the comment period to November 15, 2004 to allow 
agencies and the public additional time to provide comments on the 
Draft RMP/Draft EIS.

DATES: Comments on the Draft RMP/Draft EIS must be received no later 
than November 15, 2004 at the address listed below.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to CCMA RMP Team, Bureau of 
Land Management, Hollister Field Office, 20 Hamilton Court, Hollister, 
CA 95023. Comments may also be sent by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d79bb2a4bbae8884babea3bf97b4b6f9b5bbbaf9b0b8a1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f537a6c7366404c72766b775f7c7e317d737231787069">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George E. Hill, Assistant Field 
Manager, at the above address, telephone number (831) 630-5036, or e-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cf88aaa0bda8aa9087a6a3a38facaee1ada3a2e1a8a0b9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5215373d2035370d1a3b3e3e1231337c303e3f7c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 6, 2004.
Robert E. Beehler,
Field Office Manager, Hollister Field Office.
[FR Doc. 04-22922 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 4 0 0 3 1 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. C A R L O S G O N Z A L E Z

- M I R E L E S , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 7 : 0 9

- C R

- 1 2 5 2

- 1

B e f o r e S M I T H , D E N N I S , a n d C L E M E N T , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t C a r l o s G o n z a l e z M i r e l e s h a s m o v e d f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f

o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. G o n z a l e z - M i r e l e s h a s n o t f i l e d a

r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o

n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o

w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n ,
a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 26 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40031 Document: 00511274669 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010
§ 307.19 RLF loan portfolio Sales and Securitizations. EDA may take such actions as appropriate to enable an RLF Recipient to sell or securitize RLF loans, except that EDA may not issue a Federal guaranty covering any issued Security. With prior approval from EDA, an RLF Recipient may enter into a Sale or a Securitization of all or a portion of its RLF loan portfolio, provided: ( a ) An RLF Recipient must use all proceeds from any Sale or Securitization (net of reasonable transaction costs) to make additional RLF loans;
( b ) No Security collateralized by RLF loans and other RLF property and offered in a secondary market transaction pursuant to a Securitization shall be treated as an Exempt Security for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (15 U.S.C. 77a *et seq.*), or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.*) (the “*Exchange Act*”), unless exempted by a rule or regulation issued by the Commission; and
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (b), no provision of this section supersedes or otherwise affects the application of the “securities laws” (as such term is defined in section 3(a)(47) of the Exchange Act) or the rules, regulations or orders issued by the Commission or a self-regulatory organization under the Commission.
[71 FR 56675, Sept. 27, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 76135, Dec. 19, 2014]
#### § 5003.3 [Reserved]
### §58a–3. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 58a–3 was editorially reclassified as section 6623 of this title.
§ 112.7 Illustrative applications. ( a ) *Employment.* The discrimination prohibited by § 112.4 includes but is not limited to any action (taken directly or through contractual or other arrangements) which subjects an individual to discrimination on the ground of race, color or national origin in any employment practice, including recruitment or recruitment advertising, employment, layoff or termination, upgrading, demotion, or transfer, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and use of facilities.
( b ) *Financial assistance.* The discrimination prohibited by § 112.5 includes but is not limited to the failure or refusal, because of the race, color, or national origin of a person, to extend a loan or equity financing to him or to any business concern of which he is an owner or employee; or, in the case of financing which has actually been extended, the failure or refusal, because of the race, color, or national origin of the borrower or of an owner or employee of the borrower, to accord the borrower fair treatment and the customary courtesies regarding such matters as default, grace periods and the like.
( c ) *Accommodations or services.* The discrimination prohibited by § 112.6 includes but is not limited to the failure or refusal, because of the race, color, or national origin of a person, to accept him on a nonsegregated basis as a patient, student, visitor, guest, member, customer, passenger or patron.
( d ) *Affirmative action.* ( 1 ) In some situations even though past discriminatory practices have been abandoned, the consequences of such practices continue to impede the full availability of equal opportunity. If the efforts required of the applicant or recipient under § 112.3(b)(3) to provide information as to the availability of equal opportunity, and the rights of individuals under this regulation, have failed to overcome these consequences, it will become necessary for such applicant or recipient to take additional steps to make equal opportunity fully available to racial and nationality groups previously subjected to discrimination.
( 2 ) Even though an applicant or recipient has never used discriminatory policies, the opportunities in the business it operates may not in fact be equally available to some racial or nationality groups. In such circumstances a recipient may properly give special consideration to race, color, or national origin to make opportunity more widely available to such groups.
[30 FR 298, Jan. 9, 1965, as amended at 38 FR 17934, July 5, 1973]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-11 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, January 22, 1999)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste has

scheduled a meeting February 23-25 in Rockville, Maryland.

Topics to be discussed include the Department of Energy’s viability assessment on

Yucca Mountain, waste research, the high-level waste repository design, and a meeting with the

Nuclear Energy Institute -- an industry organization.

Those wishing to make oral statements should notify the Chief of the Nuclear Waste

Branch, Richard Major, (301-415-7366) in advance. Other aspects of the meeting, including an

opportunity for public comment, will be described in a forthcoming edition of the Federal

Register.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the NRC’s Two

White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. It will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day and

continue until 6:00 p.m. on February 23-24, and until 4:00 p.m. on February 25.

###
### §288m. Contingent fund

The expenses of the Office shall be paid from the contingent fund of the Senate in accordance with section 6503 of this title, and upon vouchers approved by the Counsel.

(Pub. L. 95–521, title VII, §716, Oct. 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 1885.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 3, 1979, see section 717 of Pub. L. 95–521, set out as a note under section 288 of this title.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 1:20-cv-2387-DPG

LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC, et al., 

Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR 

PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for 

Justin L. Ormand, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of 

Electronic Filing, pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer Review, and 

Discipline of Attorneys in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and 

Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having considered the motion 

and all other relevant factors, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

The Motion is GRANTED and Justin L. Ormand, may appear and participate in this action 

on behalf of Defendant Imperial Brands PLC. The Clerk shall provide electronic notification of 

all electronic filings to Justin L. Ormand, at Justin.Ormand@AllenOvery.com.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Miami-Dade County, Florida, this 

day of 2020.

HONORABLE DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 13-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2020 Page 1 of 1
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

No: II-97-70

Contact: Ken Clark (404) 562-4416

(Tuesday, September 23, 1997)

Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417

NRC STAFF TO HOLD CONFERENCE WITH DUKE POWER COMPANY TO

DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT McGUIRE NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a

predecisional enforcement conference with Duke Power Company on

Wednesday, October 1, to discuss apparent violations of NRC

regulations involving ice condenser doors at the McGuire nuclear

power plant near Huntersville, North Carolina.

The apparent violations involve the company’s failure to

ensure that ice condenser inlet doors on Unit 2 would be able to

open if needed and a failure to perform adequate corrective actions

based on industry experience and operational events at McGuire.

The ice condenser is a passive accident mitigation system

containing about two and one-half million pounds of borated ice.

If an accident were to occur, the ice condenser system would

condense steam and lower pressure in the plant’s containment

structure. The ice is located behind a number of doors designed to

open when the pressure in containment reaches a certain level above

the pressure inside in the ice condenser area.

In July, McGuire plant employees determined that 10 of the 48

ice condenser inlet doors in lower containment were incapable of

opening with less force than specified in the plant’s technical

specifications and may not have opened in an accident situation.

The meeting will be held in the NRC Atlanta office, located at

61 Forsyth Street, Room 24T20, at 10:00 a. m. It will be open to

observation by the public.

NRC officials said the decision to hold a predecisional

enforcement conference does not mean that a determination has been

made that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will

be taken.
The purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes,

and safety significance; to provide the licensee with an

opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in NRC

inspection reports; and to enable the company to outline its

proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated

enforcement action, such as a civil penalty, will be made at the

conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a

later time.

#
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-61562-CIV-ALTMAN/Hunt

GARNETTE VASSOR,

Plaintiff,

v.

HARKHAM SHIPPING, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

ORDER OF REFERRAL

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the parties’ jointly filed Consent to U.S. 

Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction [ECF No. 37]. The parties have noted their consent to proceed 

before United States Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt for all further matters in this case. The 

Court, being fully advised, hereby

ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that this case is REFERRED to United States Magistrate 

Judge Patrick M. Hunt to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of judgment in accordance 

with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. All papers filed in this matter 

shall bear the caption CASE NO. 20-61562-CIV-HUNT.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 24th day of November 2020.

 

 _________________________________

 ROY K. ALTMAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-61562-PMH Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/25/2020 Page 1 of 1
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-01-020 May 21, 2001

CONTACT: Breck Henderson 

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC CHAIRMAN TO HOLD NEWS BRIEFING

FOLLOWING VISIT TO ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE

Dr. Richard Meserve, chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, will visit Arkansas

Nuclear One on Thursday, May 24. Chairman Meserve will tour the plant and meet with Entergy

Operations, Inc. managers and staff. He will also meet with NRC resident inspectors responsible for

the day-to-day inspection of the plant.

Chairman Meserve will meet with interested news media representatives at 1:00 p.m. in room

246 at the Reeves E. Ritchie Training Center at the ANO plant site to discuss his visit and answer any

questions reporters may have about NRC oversight of the plant.

Dr. Meserve was sworn in as chairman of the NRC on October 29, 1999. Prior to that, he was

a partner in the Washington, D.C., law firm of Covington & Burling, having joined the firm in 1981.

From 1977 to 1981, he served on the White House staff as legal counsel to the President's Science and

Technology Advisor. He also served as chairman or a member of several National Academy of

Sciences committees.

For a more detailed version of Dr. Meserveís biography, visit the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRC/WHATIS/meserve.vitae.html .

# # #
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-187 December 27, 2000

NRC EXTENDS DATE FOR BWX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. TO SUBMIT

DECOMMISSIONING PLAN FOR PARKS TOWNSHIP DISPOSAL AREA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has extended until next June 4, the due date for BWX

Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) to submit a decommissioning plan for its Shallow Land Disposal Area in

Parks Township, Pennsylvania.

The agency granted the extension, from December 6, to provide time for BWXT, a nuclear

materials licensee, and the Army Corps of Engineers to coordinate on remediation activities, as well as

to ensure the coordination of new responsibilities and duties between the NRC, the Corps and BWXT.

By recent Congressional mandate, the Corps is to determine the appropriate response under the

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act to address contamination at

the Pennsylvania site. Congress has appropriated $5 million for the Corps to perform these activities

next year as part of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2001.

The NRC plans to hold a public information meeting near the site next spring to discuss

coordination between the agency, BWXT and the Corps relating to contamination and

decommissioning issues.

The Shallow Land Disposal Area is located in Armstrong County, about 23 miles east-northeast

of Pittsburgh. The disposal area was used by a former owner, Nuclear Materials and Equipment

Corporation, to dispose of both radioactively contaminated wastes (primarily uranium and thorium)

and non-radioactive wastes in accordance with NRC regulations in effect at the time.

###
§ 111.21 Record of transactions. ( a ) Each broker must keep current in a correct, orderly, and itemized manner records of account reflecting all his financial transactions as a broker. He must keep and maintain on file copies of all his correspondence and other records relating to his customs business.
( b ) Each broker must provide notification to the CBP Office of Information Technology Security Operations Center (CBP SOC) of any known breach of electronic or physical records relating to the broker's customs business. Notification must be electronically provided (*cbpsoc@cbp.dhs.gov*) within 72 hours of the discovery of the breach, including any known compromised importer identification numbers (*see* 19 CFR 24.5). Within ten (10) business days of the notification, a broker must electronically provide an updated list of any additional known compromised importer identification numbers. To the extent that additional information is subsequently discovered, the broker must electronically provide that information within 72 hours of discovery. Brokers may also call CBP SOC at a telephone number posted on CBP.gov with questions as to the reporting of the breach, if any guidance is needed.
( c ) Each broker must comply with the provisions of this part and part 163 of this chapter when maintaining records that reflect on his transactions as a broker.
( d ) Each broker must designate a knowledgeable employee as the party responsible for brokerage-wide recordkeeping requirements. Each broker must maintain accurate and current point of contact information in a CBP-authorized electronic data interchange (EDI) system. If a CBP-authorized EDI system is not available, then the information must be provided in writing to the processing Center.
[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63315, Oct. 18, 2022]
#### § 122.115 Labeling of cargo.

A warning label, as required by § 18.4(e) of this chapter, shall be attached to all transit air cargo not directly exported from the port of arrival before the cargo leaves the port of arrival.