alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2373]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Review of Conference Grants (R13s).
    Date: March 18, 2004.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIEHS/National Institutes of Health, Building 4401, East 
Campus, 79 T.W. Alexander Drive, EC-3446, Research Triangle Park, NC 
27709, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: RoseAnne M McGee, Associate Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Office of Program 
Operations, Division of Extramural Research and Training, Nat. Inst. 
of Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-30, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27709, 919/541-0752.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Devlelopment 
in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to 
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research 
and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 28, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-2373 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### §31c. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–51, §139(b)(2), Oct. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 967

Section, acts July 9, 1952, ch. 598, 66 Stat. 467; Aug. 1, 1953, ch. 304, title I, 67 Stat. 322, provided that, for taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1953, the place of residence of a Member of Congress (including any Delegate and Resident Commissioner) within the State, congressional district, Territory, or possession which he represented in Congress would be considered his home for the purposes of tax provisions making deductible certain living expenses away from home, but that amounts expended by such Member within each taxable year for living expenses could not be deducted for income tax purposes in excess of $3,000.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1980, see section 139(b)(3) of Pub. L. 97–51, as amended, set out as an Effective Date of 1981 Amendment note under section 162 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 10, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-100

Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-26176 SP, 20-66 AP

________________

Norma W. Ewing,

Appellant,

vs.

Avansa Auto Sales Corp.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria D. 

Ortiz, Judge.

Law Offices of Shaun M. Zaciewski, P.A., and Shaun M. Zaciewski, 

for appellant.

No appearance, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, HENDON, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 

1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979).
§ 122.43 General declaration. ( a ) *When required.* A general declaration, Customs Form 7507, shall be filed for all aircraft required to enter under § 122.41 (Aircraft required to enter).
( b ) *Exception.* Aircraft arriving directly from Canada on a flight beginning in Canada and ending in the U.S. need not file a general declaration to enter. Instead, an air cargo manifest (see § 122.48) may be filed in place of the general declaration, regardless of whether cargo is on board. The air cargo manifest shall state the following: I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this manifest contains an exact and true account of all cargo on board this aircraft. Signature (Aircraft Commander or Agent)
( c ) *Form.* The general declaration shall be on Customs Form 7507 or on a privately printed form prepared under § 122.5. The form shall contain all required information, unless the information is given in some other manner under subpart E of this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,334
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     51,706
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,115
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,141
<LOANS>                                        121,180
<ALLOWANCE>                                        828
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 196,770
<DEPOSITS>                                     152,399
<SHORT-TERM>                                    18,242
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,116
<LONG-TERM>                                        430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           288
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 196,770
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,064
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,931
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   173
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,168
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,287
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 605
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,276
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      261
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 335
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,616
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,854
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.16
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,538
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   907
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      358
<RECOVERIES>                                        18
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  827
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            827


</TABLE>
### §6321. Lien for taxes

If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same after demand, the amount (including any interest, additional amount, addition to tax, or assessable penalty, together with any costs that may accrue in addition thereto) shall be a lien in favor of the United States upon all property and rights to property, whether real or personal, belonging to such person.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 779.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 89–719, §1(a), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1125, provided that: "This Act [enacting sections 3505, 7425, 7426, and 7810 of this title, amending sections 545, 6322 to 6325, 6331, 6332, 6334, 6335, 6337 to 6339, 6342, 6343, 6502, 6503, 6532, 7402, 7403, 7421, 7424, 7505, 7506, and 7809 of this title, sections 1346, 1402, and 2410 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, and section 270a of former Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, redesignating section 7425 as 7427 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 6323 and 7424 of this title, and under section 1346 of Title 28] may be cited as the 'Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966'."
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00295-CR

BYRON JACK RICKARD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 30th District Court

of Wichita County (61,604-A)

November 30, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mike Wallach___________________

 Justice Mike Wallach
1995 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

6-30-1995

United States v Edmonds

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 93-1890

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"United States v Edmonds" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 104.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/104
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

_______________ 

NO. 93-1890 

_______________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

THEODORE EDMONDS, 

 Appellant 

_______________ 

Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, 

 GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, 

 ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE, SAROKIN, and GARTH298, Circuit

 Judges. 

O R D E R

 A majority of the active judges having voted for 

rehearing in banc in the above appeal, it is 

 O R D E R E D that the Clerk of this Court vacate the 

panel's opinion and judgment entered April 18, 1995 insofar as it 

relates to No. 93-1890 and list the above case for rehearing in 

banc at the convenience of the court. 

 By the Court, 

 \s\ Dolores K. Sloviter

 Chief Judge 

Dated: June 29, l995 

 

298as to panel rehearing only.
§ 68.7 Conduct of hearings. ( a ) The Judge shall be responsible for the fair and expeditious conduct of proceedings.
( b ) The Federal Insurance Administrator shall be represented by the Chief Counsel or his/her designee.
( c ) One administrative hearing shall be held for any one community unless the Federal Insurance Administrator for good cause shown grants a separate hearing or hearings.
( d ) The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the community or his/her designee shall represent all appellants from that community; *Provided,* That any appellant may petition the board to allow such appellant to make an appearance on his/her own behalf. Such a petition shall be granted only upon a showing of good cause.
( e ) Hearings shall be open to the public.
( f ) A verbatim transcript will be made of the hearing. An appellant may order copies of the transcribed verbatim record directly from the reporter and will be responsible for payments.
[47 FR 23449, May 29, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 33879, Aug. 27, 1984]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-00-27 June 13, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF CONCLUDES D. C. COOK IMPROVEMENTS

SUFFICIENT FOR STARTUP OF UNIT 2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has determined that the performance improvements

and plant modifications at the D. C. Cook Nuclear Power Station are sufficient for Unit 2 at the plant

to resume operations. The two-reactor facility, operated by American Electric Power Co., is at

Bridgman, Michigan.

The utility is completing its final preparations for restart. NRC inspectors will be monitoring

the Unit 2 startup on a round-the-clock basis until the plant is operating routinely.

Both units at the plant were shut down in September 1997 as a result of NRC inspection

findings which questioned the capabilities of key plant emergency systems to meet their design

requirements. Since then, the utility has completed major reviews of plant safety systems and

corrected problems which were identified.

Work is continuing on Unit 1 at D. C. Cook, and the utility expects it to be ready to resume

operation later this year.

Since the September 1997 shutdown, numerous inspections have been performed by the NRC

resident inspectors and by inspectors based in the regional offices and NRC headquarters in Rockville,

Maryland. These inspections have focused on the improvements being made at the plant and on the

readiness of plant safety systems and the plant staff to resume operation.

An NRC Restart Oversight Panel, composed of managers and staff members from the regional

and headquarters offices, will continue to monitor the performance of Unit 2 as it resumes operations

and the utility’s ongoing work to prepare Unit 1 for restart. This panel will continue to hold periodic

meetings, open to the public, to review the status of activities at the plant.

The letter from NRC Regional Administrator James Dyer to American Electric Power Co. on

the NRC’s restart determination has been posted on the NRC’s web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports

# #
#### § 115.18 Decision of Commissioner of Customs final.

The decision of the Commissioner on any matter appealed to him is final.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-114 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, July 8, 1998)

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ATLANTA JULY 29

Two subcommittees of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on

Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) have scheduled a joint meeting on July 29 at the agency’s regional

office in Atlanta.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held at the Atlanta Federal Center, 61

Forsyth Street, S.W., Suite 23 T85, Atlanta, Georgia.

The Subcommittees on Plant Operations and on Fire Protection will meet at 8:30 a.m.

to discuss the region’s activities including significant safety events, on-line maintenance, the

plant performance review program, results of the pilot fire protection functional inspection, and

other fire protection issues.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for public comment, will be

described in a Notice of Meeting published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

#
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 579 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.579

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty one

                                 An Act

 
 To make a technical correction to the ALS Disability Insurance Access 
                              Act of 2019.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RETROACTIVE ACCESS TO SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY BENEFITS 
INDIVIDUALS WITH AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS (ALS).
    (a) In General.--Section 2(b) of the ALS Disability Insurance 
Access Act of 2019 (Public Law 116-250) is amended by striking 
``applications for disability insurance benefits filed after the date 
of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``applications for disability 
insurance benefits approved after the date that is 5 months before the 
date of enactment of this Act''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the ALS Disability Insurance 
Access Act of 2019 (Public Law 116-250).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.473 Issuance of negative origin determinations. If CBP determines, as a result of an origin verification initiated under this subpart, that the good which is the subject of the verification does not qualify as an originating good, it will issue a determination in writing or via an authorized electronic data interchange system to the importer that sets forth the following: ( a ) A description of the good that was the subject of the verification together with the identifying numbers and dates of the export and import documents pertaining to the good;
( b ) A statement setting forth the findings of fact made in connection with the verification and upon which the determination is based;
( c ) With specific reference to the rules applicable to originating goods as set forth in General Note 26, HTSUS, and in §§ 10.450 through 10.463 of this subpart, the legal basis for the determination; and
( d ) A notice of intent to deny preferential tariff treatment on the good which is the subject of the determination.
[CBP Dec. 05-07, 70 FR 10873, Mar. 7, 2005, as amended by CBP Dec. 06-39, 71 FR 76134, Dec. 20, 2006]
### §6633. Media support services

#### (a) Definitions

In this section, the terms "national committee" and "political party" have the meaning given such terms in section 30101 of title 52.

#### (b) In general

The official duties of employees of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate under the Senate Daily Press Gallery, the Senate Periodical Press Gallery, the Senate Press Photographers Gallery, and the Senate Radio and Television Correspondents Gallery may include providing media support services with respect to the presidential nominating conventions of the national committees of political parties.

#### (c) Approval of Sergeant at Arms

The terms and conditions under which employees perform official duties under subsection (b) shall be subject to the approval of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.

#### (d) Effective date

This section shall apply to fiscal year 2008 and each fiscal year thereafter.

(Pub. L. 110–161, div. H, title I, §7, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2222.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 61f–13 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2008, which is div. H of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008.
### §1822. Wages, supplies, and other working arrangements

#### (a) Payment of wages

Each farm labor contractor, agricultural employer, and agricultural association which employs any migrant agricultural worker shall pay the wages owed to such worker when due.

#### (b) Purchase of goods or services by worker

No farm labor contractor, agricultural employer, or agricultural association shall require any migrant agricultural worker to purchase any goods or services solely from such farm labor contractor, agricultural employer, or agricultural association.

#### (c) Violation of terms of working arrangement

No farm labor contractor, agricultural employer, or agricultural association shall, without justification, violate the terms of any working arrangement made by that contractor, employer, or association with any migrant agricultural worker.

(Pub. L. 97–470, title II, §202, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2591.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days from Jan. 14, 1983, see section 524 of Pub. L. 97–470, set out as a note under section 1801 of this title.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-10074-JLK

RHIANNA KOCKA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BREEZY BUDDHA CAFÉ, LLC, et al.,

Defendants. 

 / 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER APPROVING

SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Approve FLSA

Settlement Agreement and Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (D.E. #17) filed

August 26, 2020, in the above-styled case. Accordingly, after a careful review of the

record and pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED as follows:

1. That the parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Parties’ Settlement and

Dismissing Case with Prejudice (D.E. #17) be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED.

2. The above-styled case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court

retains jurisdiction of this matter for the enforcement of the terms and conditions of

settlement.

3. All unresolved pending motions in this case are hereby DENIED as moot.

4. The Pretrial Conference previously set for November 5, 2021 and the

Case 4:20-cv-10074-JLK Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Trial previously set for January 31, 2022 are hereby CANCELED.

5. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case. 

DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at the James Lawrence King Federal Justice 

Building and United States Courthouse, Miami, Florida, this 27 day of August, 2020. th

 

JAMES LAWRENCE KING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: All Counsel of Record

Case 4:20-cv-10074-JLK Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2020 Page 2 of 2
SCWC-14-0000985

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

STATE OF HAWAI#I, 

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

PATRICK W. DEGUAIR, JR., 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-14-0000985; CR. NO. 09-1-0336)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Patrick W. Deguair,

Jr.’s application for writ of certiorari filed on October 26,

2017, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 21, 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-14-0000985

21-DEC-2017

08:25 AM
#### § 146.61 Constructive transfer to Customs territory.

The port director shall accept receipt of any entry in proper form provided under this subpart, and the merchandise described therein will be considered to have been constructively transferred to Customs territory at that time, even though the merchandise remains physically in the zone. If the entry is thereafter rejected or cancelled, the merchandise will be considered at that time to be constructively transferred back into the zone in its previous zone status.