alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the 12 months ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles N.Martin, Jr., Chairman of the Board  and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                        of the Exchange Act; and

            (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Charles N. Martin, Jr.                      Charles N. Martin, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerSeptember 23, 2003
§ 127.36 Claim for surplus proceeds of sale. ( a ) *Filing of claim.* Claims for the surplus proceeds of the sale of unclaimed or abandoned merchandise shall be filed with the port director at whose direction the merchandise was sold. The following shall be used in filing a claim: ( 1 ) *Unclaimed merchandise.* Claims for surplus proceeds of the sale of unclaimed merchandise which has become abandoned and sold under section 491 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1491), shall be supported by the original bill of lading. If only part of a shipment is involved, either a photostatic or certified copy of the original bill of lading may be submitted in lieu of the original bill of lading.
( 2 ) *Involuntarily abandoned merchandise* — ( i ) *Warehouse goods deemed abandoned.* Claims for surplus proceeds of sale of warehouse goods deemed involuntarily abandoned sold under section 559 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1559), shall be established by reference to the warehouse entry, or, if the right to withdraw the merchandise from warehouse has been transferred, by reference to the documents by which the transfer was made.
( ii ) *Trade fair articles deemed abandoned.* Claims for surplus proceeds of sale of trade fair articles deemed involuntarily (mandatorily) abandoned under section 4 of the Trade Fair Act of 1959 (19 U.S.C. 1753(c)), shall be supported by the original bill of lading. If only part of a shipment is involved, either a photostatic copy or certified copy of the original bill of lading may be submitted in lieu of the original bill of lading. (See § 147.47 of this chapter.)
( b ) *Payment of claim.* If a claim of the owner or consignee of unclaimed or abandoned merchandise for the surplus proceeds of sale is properly established as provided in this section, such proceeds of sale shall be paid to him pursuant to section 493 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1493).
( c ) *Doubtful claims.* Any doubtful claims for the proceeds of sale along with all pertinent documents and information available to the port director shall be forwarded to the Commissioner of Customs for instructions or for referral to the General Accounting Office for direct settlement.
#### Arnon L. Squiers, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for Jacob A. Ondrak, Plaintiff, v. Hattie Scheuer and Others, Defendants. In the Matter of the Application of Hattie Scheuer and Others, Appellants, for Directions to John E. Connelly, as Receiver, etc., Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ,
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2005, of Synagro Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
C. Boucher, Jr., certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company and that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

      /s/ Robert C. Boucher, Jr.
      ----------------------------
      Robert C. Boucher, Jr.
      May 5, 2005

                                       34
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.35 Models of women's wearing apparel. ( a ) Models of women's wearing apparel admitted under subheading 9813.00.10, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), shall not be removed from the importer's establishment for reproducing, copying, painting, sketching, or for any other use by others, nor be used in the importer's establishment for such purposes except by the importer or his employees.
( b ) Invoices covering models of women's wearing apparel entered under subheading 9813.00.10 or 9813.00.25, HTSUS shall state the kind and color of the principal material from which the apparel is made, and shall contain a description of the lining and the trimming, stating whether composed of fur, lace, embroidery, or other material. Invoices shall also contain a statement as to how the trimming is applied, that is, whether on the cuffs, collar, sleeves, or elsewhere, and the total value of each completed garment or article.
[28 FR 14663, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 87-75, 52 FR 20066, May 29, 1987; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51248, Dec. 21, 1988]
ˇ ̨ ̋ ̧ ̊ ̇ ̆ ̄ ̧ ̃ ̧ ̊ˆ ̆ıÙÛÚ ̊ ̃Ò ̆ð ̊ÔÙÚ ̃ ̧ÓÒÌ ̆ÏÓÎÎ ̋ˆˆ ̋Ó ̨

 ̋Û ̊ ̆Ó ̆ÙÚ ̋Û ̆ ̃ ̋Òˆ ̆ð ̊Ô ̋Ó ̨ ̆

 ̆ÚÚ ̊ ̨ ̇ ̃Ú ̊ ̆ðÓ ̃ ̇ ̆ ̆ ̋ ̨Ô ̆Ó ̆ÒÙˆˆ ̋ ̃ ̆ ̆

 ̃ ̆ ̆

 ̨ ̧ ̊Ò ̨ ̊ ̧ ̆ ̆ ̇ˆ  ̨ÒÛÔÓ ̆ÓÒ ̆ ̨ ̃ˆ  ̨ÒÛÔÓ

  ̃ ̨Ù ̃ÒÌ ̆ ̆

ÏÓ ̨ ̧ ̃Û ̧   ̋ ̃ ̨ ̊ ̆ ̄ÛÒ ̊ ̨Û ̋ ̆ ð ̆    ̆ð ̄

ı ̊ ̋Ú ̆ ̆ ̄ ̊ ̊ ̃ ̨ ̆ ̆

ıðÏ ̆ ̄Ï  ˇ ̄ ̆  ̆ ı ̄ ̆ı ̆  ̆Ïð ̆ðı ̆ı ̄

Ó ̆Î ̊ ̊ ̧ ̋ ̨Ôˆ ̆ ̧Ó ̆ ̇ ̋ˆÛÙˆˆ ̆ ̃ ̃Ò ̊ ̨ ̧ ̆ ̋ÓÚ ̃ ̧ ̋Ó ̨ˆ ̆Ó ̆ıÙÛÚ ̊ ̃Ò ̆ð ̊ÔÙÚ ̃ ̧ÓÒÌ ̆ÏÓÎÎ ̋ˆˆ ̋Ó ̨ ̆ÒÙÚ ̊ˆ ̆ ̃ ̧ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆ Ó ̊ ̆ÏÒ ̊ ̊

 ̨ÙÛÚ ̊ ̃Ò ̆Ó ̊Ò ̆Ú ̃ ̨ ̧ ̆ ̃ ̊ ̆ ̊ ̊ ̨ ̆ˆÛ ̊ ̇ÙÚ ̊ ̇ ̆ÓÒ ̆  ̊ ̇ ̨ ̊ˆ ̇ ̃Ì ̆ ̃ ̨Ù ̃ÒÌ ̆ ̆ ̆ Ó ̊ ̆ÏÒ ̊ ̊ ̆ÚÓÛ ̃ ̧ ̊ ̇ ̆ ̋ ̨ ̆  ̃ ̨ÛÓÛˆ ̆Ò ̋ ̇Ô ̊

ı ̆ ̋ˆ ̆Ó ̊Ò ̃ ̧ ̊ ̇ ̆Ì ̆ÙÚ ̋Û ̆ ̄ ̊Ò ̋Û ̊ ̆Ú ̊Û ̧Ò ̋Û ̆ ̆ ̃ˆ ̆ ̄ ̆ÏÓÎ ̃ ̨Ì

 ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆

 ̊ ̆ ̋Òˆ ̧ ̆Ó ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆Ò ̊ ̇ ̊Û ̋ˆ ̋Ó ̨ ̃Ú ̆ ̊ ̨ÓÒÛ ̊Î ̊ ̨ ̧ ̆ÛÓ ̨ ̊Ò ̊ ̨Û ̊ˆ ̆ ̋ÚÚ ̆ ̊Ô ̋ ̨ ̆ ̃ ̧ ̆ ̆ ̃ Î ̆ ̋ ̨ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆  ̋ ̋ˆ ̋Ó ̨ ̆Ó ̆ıÙÛÚ ̊ ̃Ò

  ̃ ̧ ̊Ò ̋ ̃Úˆ ̆ ̄ ̃ ̊ ̧Ì ̆ÛÓ ̨ ̊Ò ̊ ̨Û ̊ ̆ÒÓÓÎ ̆ ̃ ̧ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆ıðÏ ̆ð ̊Ô ̋Ó ̨ ̆ ̆Ó ̋Û ̊ ̆ ̋ ̨ ̆ ̋ ̨Ô ̆Ó ̆ÒÙˆˆ ̋ ̃ ̆ ̃  ̆ ̆ıðÏ ̆ˆ ̧ ̃ ̆ ̃ ̨ ̇ ̆ ̄

Ó ̋Û ̋ ̃Úˆ ̆ ̋ÚÚ ̆ ̇ ̋ˆÛÙˆˆ ̆ ̃ ̨ ̆ ̃ ̃Ò ̊ ̨ ̧ ̆ ̋ÓÚ ̃ ̧ ̋Ó ̨ ̆Ú ̃ˆ ̧ ̆ıÓ ̊Î ̊Ò ̆ ̆ ̋ ̨ÓÚ ̋ ̨Ô ̆ ̃ ̆ ̃ ̋ÚÙÒ ̊ ̆ ̧Ó ̆ÓÚÚÓ ̆ÒÓÛ ̊ ̇ÙÒ ̊ˆ ̆ ̃ˆˆÓÛ ̋ ̃ ̧ ̊ ̇

 ̋ ̧ ̆ÛÓ ̨ ̧ÒÓÚ ̆ÒÓ ̇ ̆ÎÓ ̊Î ̊ ̨ ̧ˆ ̆ ̇ÙÒ ̋ ̨Ô ̆ ̃ ̆ˆÙ ̧ ̇Ó ̨ ̆Î ̃ÒÔ ̋ ̨ ̆ ̇ ̊ÎÓ ̨ˆ ̧Ò ̃ ̧ ̋Ó ̨ ̆ ̆ ̊ ̆ ̇ ̊ÎÓ ̨ˆ ̧Ò ̃ ̧ ̋Ó ̨ ̆ ̃ˆ ̆ ̇ ̊ˆ ̋Ô ̨ ̊ ̇ ̆ ̧Ó ̆ ̧ ̊ˆ ̧

 ̊ ̧ ̊Ò ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆Ú ̃ ̨ ̧ ̆ÛÓÙÚ ̇ ̆ˆÙÛÛ ̊ˆˆÙÚÚÌ ̆ˆÙ ̧ ̆ ̇Ó ̨ ̆ ̊ ̊ ̨ ̆ ̧ÓÙÔ ̆ ̃ ̆Û ̊Ò ̧ ̃ ̋ ̨ ̆ ̨ÙÎ ̊Ò ̆Ó ̆ÛÓ ̨ ̧ÒÓÚ ̆ÒÓ ̇ˆ ̆ÛÓÙÚ ̇ ̆ ̨Ó ̧ ̆ ̊

 ̋ ̨ˆ ̊Ò ̧ ̊ ̇

 ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆

 ̧ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆ˆ ̊ÛÓ ̨ ̇ ̆Ò ̊ ̇ ̊Û ̋ˆ ̋Ó ̨ ̃Ú ̆ÛÓ ̨ ̊Ò ̊ ̨Û ̊ ̆ˆÛ ̊ ̇ÙÚ ̊ ̇ ̆ ̧Ó ̆ ̊Ô ̋ ̨ ̆ ̃ ̧ ̆ ̆Î ̆ ̋ ̨ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆ˆ ̃Î ̊ ̆ÚÓÛ ̃ ̧ ̋Ó ̨ ̆ıðÏ ̆ˆ ̧ ̃ ̆ ̃ ̨ ̇

 ̄ ̆Ó ̋Û ̋ ̃Úˆ ̆ ̋ÚÚ ̆ ̇ ̋ˆÛÙˆˆ ̆ ̧Ó ̆ ̃ ̃Ò ̊ ̨ ̧ ̆ ̋ÓÚ ̃ ̧ ̋Ó ̨ˆ ̆Ò ̊Ú ̃ ̧ ̋ ̨Ô ̆ ̧Ó ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆ıðÏˆ ̆Î ̃ ̋ ̨ ̧ ̊ ̨ ̃ ̨Û ̊ ̆ÒÙÚ ̊ ̆ ̆ ̊ ̆ÒÙÚ ̊ ̆Ò ̊Ù ̋Ò ̊ˆ

Ú ̃ ̨ ̧ ̆Ó ̊Ò ̃ ̧ÓÒˆ ̆ ̧Ó ̆ÎÓ ̨ ̋ ̧ÓÒ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆ ̊ ̊Û ̧ ̋ ̊ ̨ ̊ˆˆ ̆Ó ̆Î ̃ ̋ ̨ ̧ ̊ ̨ ̃ ̨Û ̊ ̆ ̃Û ̧ ̋ ̋ ̧ ̋ ̊ˆ ̆ÓÒ ̆ˆ ̃ ̊ ̧Ìˆ ̋Ô ̨ ̋ ̋Û ̃ ̨ ̧ ̆ ̊Ù ̋Î ̊ ̨ ̧ ̆ ̋ ̨ ̆ÓÒ ̇ ̊Ò ̆ ̧Ó

Î ̋ ̨ ̋Î ̋ ̊ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆Ú ̋ ̊Ú ̋ÓÓ ̇ ̆Ó ̆ ̃ ̋ÚÙÒ ̊ ̆ ̃ ̨ ̇ ̆Ó ̆ ̊ ̊ ̨ ̧ˆ ̆Û ̃Ùˆ ̊ ̇ ̆Ì ̆ ̋ ̨ˆÙ ̋Û ̋ ̊ ̨ ̧ ̆Î ̃ ̋ ̨ ̧ ̊ ̨ ̃ ̨Û ̊

 ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆

Ó ̧ ̆Î ̊ ̊ ̧ ̋ ̨Ôˆ ̆ ̋ÚÚ ̆ ̊ ̆Ó ̊ ̨ ̆ ̧Ó ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆ÙÚ ̋Û ̆ÓÒ ̆Óˆ ̊Ò ̃ ̧ ̋Ó ̨

 ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆

 ̊ ̆ ̇ ̊Û ̋ˆ ̋Ó ̨ ̆ ̧Ó ̆ÓÚ ̇ ̆ ̃ ̆Ò ̊ ̇ ̊Û ̋ˆ ̋Ó ̨ ̃Ú ̆ ̊ ̨ÓÒÛ ̊Î ̊ ̨ ̧ ̆ÛÓ ̨ ̊Ò ̊ ̨Û ̊ ̆ ̇Ó ̊ˆ ̆ ̨Ó ̧ ̆Î ̊ ̃ ̨ ̆ ̧ ̃ ̧ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆ıðÏ ̆ ̃ˆ ̆ ̇ ̊ ̧ ̊ÒÎ ̋ ̨ ̊ ̇

 ̃ ̆ ̋ÓÚ ̃ ̧ ̋Ó ̨ ̆ ̃ˆ ̆ÓÛÛÙÒÒ ̊ ̇ ̆ÓÒ ̆ ̧ ̃ ̧ ̆ ̊ ̨ÓÒÛ ̊Î ̊ ̨ ̧ ̆ ̃Û ̧ ̋Ó ̨ ̆ ̋ÚÚ ̆ ̊ ̆ ̧ ̃ ̊ ̨ ̆ ̆ð ̃ ̧ ̊Ò ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆ÙÒÓˆ ̊ ̆ ̋ˆ ̆ ̧Ó ̆ ̇ ̋ˆÛÙˆˆ ̆ ̃ ̃Ò ̊ ̨ ̧

 ̋ÓÚ ̃ ̧ ̋Ó ̨ˆ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̋Ò ̆Û ̃Ùˆ ̊ˆ ̆ ̃ ̨ ̇ ̆ˆ ̃ ̊ ̧Ì ̆ˆ ̋Ô ̨ ̋ ̋Û ̃ ̨Û ̊ ̆ ̧Ó ̆ÒÓ ̋ ̇ ̊ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆Ú ̋Û ̊ ̨ˆ ̊ ̊ ̆ ̋ ̧ ̆ ̃ ̨ ̆ÓÓÒ ̧Ù ̨ ̋ ̧Ì ̆ ̧Ó ̆Ó ̋ ̨ ̧ ̆ÓÙ ̧ ̆ ̃ ̨Ì ̆ ̊ÒÒÓÒˆ

 ̧ ̃ ̧ ̆Î ̃Ì ̆ ̃ ̊ ̆ ̊ ̊ ̨ ̆Î ̃ ̇ ̊ ̆ ̋ ̨ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆ıðÏ ̆ ̋ ̨ˆ ̊Û ̧ ̋Ó ̨ ̆Ò ̊ÓÒ ̧ ̆ ̃ ̨ ̇ ̆ ̧Ó ̆ ̊ ̨ ̃Ú ̊ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆Ú ̋Û ̊ ̨ˆ ̊ ̊ ̆ ̧Ó ̆ÓÙ ̧Ú ̋ ̨ ̊ ̆ ̋ ̧ˆ ̆ÒÓÓˆ ̊ ̇

ÛÓÒÒ ̊Û ̧ ̋ ̊ ̆ ̃Û ̧ ̋Ó ̨

 ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆ ̆

ıÓ ̆ ̇ ̊Û ̋ˆ ̋Ó ̨ˆ ̆Ó ̨ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆ ̃ ̃Ò ̊ ̨ ̧ ̆ ̋ÓÚ ̃ ̧ ̋Ó ̨ˆ ̆ ̋ÚÚ ̆ ̊ ̆Î ̃ ̇ ̊ ̆ ̃ ̧ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆Î ̊ ̊ ̧ ̋ ̨Ôˆ ̆ ̆ ̊Ì ̆ ̋ÚÚ ̆ ̊ ̆Î ̃ ̇ ̊ ̆Ú ̃ ̧ ̊Ò ̆Ì ̆ıðÏ

Ó ̋Û ̋ ̃Úˆ
### §147. Repealed. Oct. 25, 1951, ch. 562, §1(l), 65 Stat. 638

Section, act June 6, 1900, ch. 791, §1, 31 Stat. 642, related to bound volumes from files of House of Representatives. See sections 2103 and 2114 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.
§ 11.72 Time limitations. ( a ) A claim under this part may be allowed only if it is in writing, specifies a sum certain and is received in the Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472: ( 1 ) Within 2 years after it accrues;
( 2 ) or if it cannot be filed within the time limits of paragraph (a)(1) of this section because it accrues in time of war or in time of armed conflict in which any armed force of the United States is engaged or if such a war or armed conflict intervenes within 2 years after the claim accrues, when the claimant shows good cause, the claim may be filed within 2 years after the cause ceases to exist but not more than 2 years after termination of the war or armed conflict.
( b ) For purposes of this subpart, a claim accrues at the time of the accident or incident causing the loss or damage, or at such time as the loss or damage should have been discovered by the claimant by the exercise of due diligence.
### §31b–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 31b–2 was editorially reclassified as former section 5126 of this title.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-074 June 25, 2001

NRC APPROVES TRANSFER OF OPERATING LICENSES

FOR NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved the transfer of the operating licenses for the

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, to Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC, a

subsidiary of Constellation Nuclear, LLC.

Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. had been the licensed operator and sole owner of

Unit 1, and a co-owner of Unit 2, located near Oswego, New York, since the two units began operation

-- Unit 1 in December 1969 and Unit 2 in March of 1988. Other co-owners of the facilityís Unit 2

included New York State Electric & Gas Corp., Rochester Gas & Electric Co., Central Hudson Gas &

Electric, Corp., and Long Island Lighting Co. (LILCO). LILCO will continue to retain a minority

ownership interest in Unit 2.

On February 1, Constellation, on behalf of Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC, submitted an

application to the NRC requesting approval for the license transfer. The key issues considered by the

NRC technical staff included adequacy of decommissioning funding, insurance and Constellationís

technical and financial qualifications.

The Commission published a notice on the transfer request and an opportunity for a hearing in

the Federal Register on April 2. No comments or requests for a hearing were received. 

###
### §1104. Purposes and authority of Center

#### (a) Purposes of Center

The purposes of the Center shall be—

(1) to increase awareness of the importance of public service, to foster among the youth of the United States greater recognition and understanding of the role of public service in the development of the United States, and to promote public service as a career choice;

(2) to provide training and development opportunities for State and local elected government officials and employees of State and local governments in order to assist such officials and employees to become more effective and more efficient in performing their public duties and develop their potential for accepting increased public service opportunities; and

(3) to provide training and development opportunities for those employees of Members of the Congress who perform key roles in helping Members of Congress serve the people of the United States.

#### (b) Authority of Center

The Center is authorized, consistent with this chapter, to develop such programs, activities, and services as it considers appropriate to carry out the purpose of this chapter. Such authority shall include the following:

(1) The development and implementation of educational programs for secondary and post-secondary schools and colleges designed—

(A) to improve the attitude of students toward public service;

(B) to encourage students to consider public service as a career goal;

(C) to create a better understanding of the important role that people in public service have played in the growth and development of the United States; and

(D) to foster a sense of civic responsibility among the youth of the United States.

(2) The development and implementation of programs designed—

(A) to enhance skills and abilities of public service employees and elected officials at the State and local levels of government;

(B) to make such officials more productive and effective in the performance of their duties; and

(C) to help prepare such employees and officials to assume greater responsibilities in the field of public service.

(3) The development and implementation of congressional staff training programs designed to equip congressional staff personnel to perform their duties more effectively and efficiently.

(4) The development and implementation of media and telecommunications production capabilities to assist the Center in expanding the reach of its programs throughout the United States.

(5) The establishment of library and research facilities for the collection and compilation of research materials for use in carrying out the programs of the Center.

#### (c) Program priorities

The Board of Trustees shall determine the priority of the programs to be carried out under this chapter and the amount of funds to be allocated for such programs.

(Pub. L. 100–458, title I, §115, Oct. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2173.)
#### Locomobile Company v. Edwin Nichols.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
## NO. 12

- 19

- 00382

- CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:
DAVID ALLEN RUSSELL,

RELATOR §
§
§ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM David Allen Russell, acting pro se, filed this original proceeding in which he asks this Court to direct the Anderson County District Clerk, Teresia C. Coker, to transmit and send a file stamped copy of his two complaints. However, this Court’s mandamus authority is limited to (1) a judge of a district, statuto ry county, statutory probate county, or county court in the court of appeals district; (2) a judge of a district court who is acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 52 in the court of appeals district; ( 3) an associate judge of a district or county court appointed by a judge under Chapter 201, Family Code, in the court of appeals district for the judge who appointed the associate judge; or (4) a situation
in which a writ of mandamus is necessary to protec t the Court’s jurisdiction. T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.221(a)
, (b) (West Supp. 20 18 ). The district clerk is not a judge, and Relator does not
assert that a writ of mandamus directed to the district clerk is necessary to protect this Court’s jurisdiction. Consequently, because we do not have jurisdicti on to consider the merits of Relator’s
mandamus petition, the petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. See In re Eaton , No. 12

– 15

– 00118

– CR, 2016 WL 6876502, at *1 (Tex. App.

– Tyler, Nov. 22, 2016, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Opinion delivered December 4, 2019. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. (PUBLISH)

## COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT

DECEMBER 4 , 2019

NO. 12

- 19

- 00382

- CV

DAVID ALLEN RUSSELL, Relator V.

TERESIA C. COKER , Respondent

O RIGINAL P ROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by David Allen Russell; who is the relator in appellate cause number 12

- 19

- 00382

- CV . Said petition for
writ of mandamus having been filed herein on November 20, 2019, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that it lacks jurisdiction, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of ma ndamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
#### CHE PING LIN, aka Yi Ping Lin, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 00-70614.

INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 **.

Decided May 24, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, WARDLAW, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 John Ashcroft is substituted for Janet Reno as Attorney General pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Yi Ping Lin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

Because the BIA conducted a de novo review of the record and affirmed the IJ’s adverse credibility finding, we review the BIA’s decision. *Molino-Morales v. INS,*237 F.3d 1048, 1050 (9th Cir.2001). We review credibility findings for substantial evidence, and must uphold the BIA’s findings unless the evidence compels a con*618trary result. *Singh-Kaur v. INS,*183 F.3d 1147, 1149-50 (9th Cir.1999).

The BIA provided specific, cogent reasons for its findings, specifically noting that Lin’s testimony was vague and implausible. Hart*ooni v. INS,*21 F.3d 336, 342 (9th Cir.1994). Thus, BIA’s adverse credibility determination and its conclusion that Lin is ineligible for asylum are supported by substantial evidence. *See Singh-Kaur,*183 F.3d at 1151-53.

In failing to qualify for asylum, Lin necessarily failed to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Ghaly v. INS,*58 F.3d 1425, 1429 (9th Cir.1995).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 4.473

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 185276 dated February 16, 2021

 

For Rendering

 

Data transmission services for voice

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until February 16, 2026.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated November 13, 2020 No. 495-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   O.А. Terlyakov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 122312
### GRAND PORTAGE BAND OF CHIPPEWA **ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT** PO Box 428, Grand Portage, MN 55605

January , 2011

Morris Beaton Regional Storm Water Coordinator US EPA

– Region 5 77 W. Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604

Subject: 401 Certification for the Proposed National Pollutant Discharge Elimin ation Sy stem General Permit for Pesticide Applications

Dear Mr. Beaton : Pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Grand Portage Water Quality Ordinance, the Grand Portage Environmental Resourc es Board ("Board") has the authorit y to "issue water quality certification(s) for discharges that may result in any

violation of the Band’s Water Quality Standards or Applicable Federal Standards or that may adversel y impact the quality and quantity

of Wat ers of the Reservation. Water quality certification is required to provide a reasonable assurance that the proposed activity will not violate the Band’s Water Quality

Standards or any

Applicable Federal Standards." To that end, the Board may deny a certi fication, grant a certification, grant a certification with conditions, or waive the authorit y. In accordance with its responsibilities and authority under the Grand Portage Water Quality Ordinance, the Board has evaluated water quality certification f

or the EPA General Permit for Pesticide Applications . The Board has determined that certain conditions are necessary

to protect (a) the public health and welfare of the Band, its members, and others living on its Reservation, and (b) the present and futur e use of Reservation waters for public and private water supplies, propagation of fish and aquatic life and wildlife, domestic and recreational purposes and agricultural, cultural, religious, commercial, industrial and other legitimate uses.Accordingl y, the Tribal Council adopted a resolution granting a conditional Section 401

certification of the General Permit for Pesticide Applications . The Tribal Council was acting as the Water Resources Board for the Tribe under Section 2.01(D) of the Tribe’s Water R esources Ordinance. The resolution is attached to this letter. This letter confirms that, in accordance with the Resolution the Tribe is granting the 401 certification for the General Permit for Pesticide Applications with conditions. The conditions, which are provided in the Public Notice that is attached to this certification, are full y incorporated into this certification. Those conditions are made under authority in the Grand Portage Water Quality Ordinance.
Resolution No. 1

- 11 was adopted on J anuary 13th , 2010 , after the Board provided public notice and an opportunity for a public hearing. There was no request for public hearing and no comments were received. T herefore , there are no responses to comments included in this certification.

S incerel y,

Margaret Watkins Grand Portage Environmental Department