alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          57,950
<SECURITIES>                                    28,785
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,414
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               283,176
<PP&E>                                         103,445
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 376,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,355
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           627
<OTHER-SE>                                     276,764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   376,178
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,592
<CGS>                                          125,174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  168,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (13,543)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,049
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,850)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,275)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,275)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.2011 Filing procedures. ( a ) *Place of filing.* A post-importation claim for a refund must be filed with CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically. The post-importation claim may be filed by paper or by the method specified for equivalent reporting via an authorized electronic data interchange system.
( b ) *Contents of claim.* A post-importation claim for a refund must be filed by presentation of the following: ( 1 ) A written or electronic declaration or statement stating that the good was an originating good at the time of importation and setting forth the number and date of the entry or entries covering the good;
( 2 ) A copy of a written or electronic certification prepared in accordance with § 10.2004 if a certification forms the basis for the claim, or other information demonstrating that the good qualifies for preferential tariff treatment;
( 3 ) A written statement indicating whether the importer of the good provided a copy of the entry summary or equivalent documentation to any other person. If such documentation was so provided, the statement must identify each recipient by name, CBP identification number, and address and must specify the date on which the documentation was provided; and
( 4 ) A written statement indicating whether any person has filed a protest relating to the good under any provision of law; and if any such protest has been filed, the statement must identify the protest by number and date.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 159 (Friday, October 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22674]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1554-DR]


Georgia; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia (FEMA-1554-DR), dated September 18, 2004, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 29, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 18, 2004:

    Heard and Wilkes Counties for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-22674 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                                  Midas, Inc.
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                            As of December 29, 2001
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Percent of Stock
                                                                                  Owned or
                                                                   Place of     Controlled by
         Name                                                   Incorporation   the Registrant
   ----------------------------------------                     --------------  --------------
<S>                                                             <C>            <C>
   Midas, Inc. (Registrant)                                     Delaware            100%
   Midas International Corporation                              Delaware            100%
   Midas Illinois, Inc.                                         Illinois            100%
   Midas Realty Corporation                                     Delaware            100%
   Midas Properties                                             New York            100%
   Muffler Corporation of America                               Illinois            100%
   Dealers Wholesale Inc.                                       Delaware            100%
   Huth Inc.                                                    Delaware            100%
   International Parts Corporation                              Delaware            100%
   Parts Warehouse Inc.                                         Delaware            100%
   Midas International Corporation (Wyo)                        Wyoming             100%
   Insurance Services Management, Inc.                          Delaware            100%
   Progressive Automotive Systems, Inc.                         Delaware            100%
   Cosmic Holdings LLC                                          Delaware            100%
   Midas FSC, Inc.                                              Barbados            100%
   MDS Automotive Holdings B.V.                                 Netherlands         100%
   Midas Automotive International B.V.                          Netherlands         100%
   Midas Canada Holdings, Ltd                                   Canada              100%
   Midas Canada, Inc.                                           Canada              100%
   Midas Realty Corporation of Canada, Inc.                     Canada              100%
</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA new implementation of the programming system for structural synthesis (PROSSS-2)This new implementation of the PROgramming System for Structural Synthesis (PROSSS-2) combines a general-purpose finite element computer program for structural analysis, a state-of-the-art optimization program, and several user-supplied, problem-dependent computer programs. The results are flexibility of the optimization procedure, organization, and versatility of the formulation of constraints and design variables. The analysis-optimization process results in a minimized objective function, typically the mass. The analysis and optimization programs are executed repeatedly by looping through the system until the process is stopped by a user-defined termination criterion. However, some of the analysis, such as model definition, need only be one time and the results are saved for future use. The user must write some small, simple FORTRAN programs to interface between the analysis and optimization programs. One of these programs, the front processor, converts the design variables output from the optimizer into the suitable format for input into the analyzer. Another, the end processor, retrieves the behavior variables and, optionally, their gradients from the analysis program and evaluates the objective function and constraints and optionally their gradients. These quantities are output in a format suitable for input into the optimizer. These user-supplied programs are problem-dependent because they depend primarily upon which finite elements are being used in the model. PROSSS-2 differs from the original PROSSS in that the optimizer and front and end processors have been integrated into the finite element computer program. This was done to reduce the complexity and increase portability of the system, and to take advantage of the data handling features found in the finite element program.Document ID19870008897Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsRogers, James L., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1984Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-86326NAS 1.15:86326Accession Number87N18330Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-33-53-12Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870008897.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §195a. Restriction on payment of witness fees or travel and subsistence expenses to persons subpenaed by Congressional committees

No part of any appropriation disbursed by the Secretary of the Senate shall be available on and after July 12, 1960, for the payment to any person, at the time of the service upon him of a subpena requiring his attendance at any inquiry or hearing conducted by any committee of the Congress or of the Senate or any subcommittee of any such committee, of any witness fee or any sum of money as an advance payment of any travel or subsistence expense which may be incurred by such person in responding to that subpena.

(Pub. L. 86–628, July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 449.)
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-132 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 5
 	




Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-132 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of 5
 	




Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-132 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 3 of 5
 	




Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-132 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 4 of 5
 	




Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-132 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 5 of 5
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-43 July 3, 2000

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING NEAR OCONEE PLANT

ON CHANGES IN REACTOR OVERSIGHT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for Tuesday, July 11 to

discuss the new reactor oversight process which began at Duke Energy’s Oconee nuclear power plant,

near Seneca, South Carolina, in April.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. EDT in the Six Mile Town Hall on Main Street in Six Mile,

South Carolina, and members of the public will have the opportunity to ask questions during the

meeting.

The new oversight process uses more objective, timely, and safety-significant criteria in

assessing performance, while seeking to more effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. Under

the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based personnel are

supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators. These

performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant operations, including the viability of

redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection, and security measures.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC's web site every three months. The safety significance of each inspection finding or performance

indicator is characterized by a color -- green, white, yellow, or red.

The NRC response to the inspection findings and performance indicators will be based on the

assessment. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow, or red assessments

receive increasing NRC involvement. Multiple red findings could result in a plant shutdown.

A plain language summary of the reactor oversight process is available from the NRC Office of

Public Affairs or on the web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

###
§ 122.23 Certain aircraft arriving from areas south of the U.S. ( a ) *Application.* ( 1 ) This section sets forth particular requirements for certain aircraft arriving from south of the United States. This section is applicable to all aircraft except: ( i ) Public aircraft;
( ii ) Those aircraft operated on a regularly published schedule, pursuant to a certificate of public convenience and necessity or foreign aircraft permit issued by the Department of Transportation, authorizing interstate, overseas air transportation; and
( iii ) Those aircraft with a seating capacity of more than 30 passenges or a maximum payload capacity of more than 7,500 pounds which are engaged in air transportation for compensation or hire on demand. (See 49 U.S.C. App. 1372 and 14 CFR part 298).
( 2 ) The term “place” as used in this section means anywhere outside of the inner boundary of the Atlantic (Coastal) Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) south of 30 degrees north latitude, anywhere outside of the inner boundary of the Gulf of Mexico (Coastal) ADIZ, or anywhere outside of the inner boundary of the Pacific (Coastal) ADIZ south of 33 degrees north latitude.
( b ) *Notice of arrival.* All aircraft to which this section applies arriving in the Continental United States via the U.S./Mexican border or the Pacific Coast from a foreign place in the Western Hemisphere south of 33 degrees north latitude, or from the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coasts from a place in the Western Hemisphere south of 30 degrees north latitude, from any place in Mexico, from the U.S. Virgin Islands, or [notwithstanding the definition of “United States” in § 122.1(l)] from Puerto Rico, must furnish a notice of intended arrival. Private aircraft must transmit an advance notice of arrival as set forth in § 122.22 of this part. Other than private aircraft, all aircraft to which this section applies must communicate to CBP notice of arrival at least one hour before crossing the U.S. coastline. Such notice must be communicated to CBP by telephone, radio, other method or the Federal Aviation Administration in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Contents of notice.* The advance notice of arrival shall include the following: ( 1 ) Aircraft registration number;
( 2 ) Name of aircraft commander;
( 3 ) Number of U.S. citizen passengers;
( 4 ) Number of alien passengers;
( 5 ) Place of last departure;
( 6 ) Estimated time and location of crossing U.S. border/coastline;
( 7 ) Estimated time of arrival;
( 8 ) Name of intended U.S. airport of first landing, as listed in § 122.24, unless an exemption has been granted under § 122.25, or the aircraft has not landed in foreign territory or is arriving directly from Puerto Rico, or the aircraft was inspected by Customs officers in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
[T.D. 88-12, 53 FR 9292, Mar. 22, 1988, as amended by CBP Dec. 08-43, 73 FR 68312, Nov. 18, 2008]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 10 

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 

Seattle, WA 98101-3140 

OFFICE OF 

AIR, WASTE AND TOXICS 

March 10,2014 

Ms. Barbara Trost 

Air and Water Quality Division 

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 

555 Cordova Street 

Anchorage, AK 99501-2617 

Dear Ms. Trost: 

EPA has evaluated the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation's (ADEC's) 2013 

Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan (Plan), which describes Alaska's ambient air 

monitoring network for 2013-14. 

In the Plan, ADEC requested that the State or Local Air Monitoring Site (SLAMS) carbon 

monoxide (CO) monitor at the Fairbanks Old Post Office (OPO) site be discontinued because 

oflow CO values recorded at that location as compared to the NAAQS. ADEC requested 

that the current CO monitor at the Fairbanks National Core (NCore) site serve as a substitute. 

In the Plan, ADEC provided a correlation analysis, and a frequency distribution m,alysis of 

the CO values at the NCore and OPO sites to support its request. 

In a telephone conversation with you on October 31, 2013, EPA requested that the OPO CO 

monitor remain in place for another year or two to better detennine the correlation between 

the OPO site and the NCore site. You agreed to leave the OPO CO monitor in place for at 

least another monitoring season and to revisit this issue in the 2014 Alaska network plan. 

Therefore, EPA will take no further action on this request at this time. 

With this letter, EPA is approving the 2013 Plan because it contains the necessary 

information about the network's existing and proposed sites, as specified at 40 C.F.R. § 

58.10(b). 

If you have any questions about our approval of the 2013 Annual Monitoring Network Plan, 

please contact Keith Rose at (206) 553-1949. 

cc: Chris Hall, OEA 

Keith Rose, OA WT 

Claudia Vaupel, OA WT 

~6\_-rn \A- j v,, 

Debra M. Suz~ki, ~]g'~. ~ Air Planning Unit 

-
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

No. III-00-53 September 29, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC WORKSHOP OCTOBER 5 ON HANDLING

OF DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINTS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a workshop October 5 in Lisle, Illinois, to

review the agency’s handling of complaints by nuclear industry workers who allege their employer

discriminated against them after they raised safety concerns.

The Lisle workshop will begin at 7 p.m. in the NRC’s Region III office’s third floor conference

room, 801 Warrenville Road. It will be the fourth in a series of public workshops NRC staff members

are holding throughout the country to help evaluate agency policies and develop recommendations to

enhance public protection.

The NRC has formed a Discrimination Task Group to review the way the agency handles

discrimination complaints filed by nuclear industry workers and recommend possible changes to the

agency’s regulations, enforcement policy or other guidelines. The Task Group also will consider

issues raised in a rulemaking petition filed by the Union of Concerned Scientists last October. The

petition asks the Commission to require that nuclear plant operators provide training for their

management on implementing employee protection regulations.

Draft recommendations from the Task Group will be published about the middle of next year

for public comment.

The workshop will not be transcribed, but summaries will be available from the NRC Public

Document Room at (202) 634-3273. The group’s charter and other pertinent documents related to its

activities will be posted periodically at: http://www.nrc.gov/OE on the agency’s web site. Additional

information about upcoming meetings can be obtained by calling Barry Westreich at (301) 415-3456 or

via e-mail: BCW@nrc.gov.

#####
§ 111.64 Service of notice of hearing and other papers. ( a ) *Notice of hearing.* After service of the notice and statement of charges, the processing Center will serve upon the broker and his attorney if known, by one of the methods set forth in § 111.63 or by ordinary mail, a written notice of the time and place of the hearing. The hearing will be scheduled to take place within 30 calendar days after service of the notice of hearing.
( b ) *Other papers.* Other papers relating to the hearing may be served by one of the methods set forth in § 111.63 or by ordinary mail or upon the broker's attorney.
[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63320, Oct. 18, 2022]
§ 114.11 Approval. ( a ) *Documents to be furnished.* Before an association may be approved to serve as issuing association or guaranteeing association in the United States with respect to carnets authorized under a Customs Convention or Agreement to which the United States has acceded, such association shall furnish the Commissioner a written undertaking, in a form satisfactory to the Commissioner, to perform the functions and fulfill the obligations specified in the Convention or Agreement under which carnets are to be issued or guaranteed. Evidence of affiliation with an appropriate international organization shall also be required if affiliation with such an organization is required by the Convention or Agreement under which carnets are to be issued or guaranteed.
( b ) *Publication of notice of approval.* Notice of the approval of an issuing association or a guaranteeing association with respect to a Customs Convention or Agreement to which the United States has acceded will be published in the Federal Register by the Commissioner.
[T.D. 70-134, 35 FR 9261, June 13, 1970, as amended by T.D. 71-70, 36 FR 4490, Mar. 6, 1971; T.D. 98-10, 63 FR 4168, Jan. 28, 1998]
National Park Service 

U.S. Department of the Interior 

Wrangell-St. Elias National Park & Preserve 

Chisana Airstrip (CZN) 

Location: Chisana (CZN). Located 97 nautical miles east of the Gulkana airport, in the historic mining settlement of Chisana. 

N62.065789, W142.042072 

Description: 

CTAP 122.9 

1600 foot gravel airstrip 

Elevation 3318 feet 

Public tie-downs are available. Two other private, but active airstrips are in the vicinity. Please respect private property in the area.
#### Marguerite H. McFarlane et al., as Executors of Clement J. Heaton, Deceased, Plaintiffs, v. Elk Garage Co., Inc., et al., Defendants, Chester Noyes, Defendant-Respondent, and Gotham Garage Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part. Settle order on notice.