alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §795g. Purpose

It is the purpose of this subchapter to authorize allotments, in addition to grants for vocational rehabilitation services under subchapter I, to assist States in developing collaborative programs with appropriate entities to provide supported employment services for individuals with the most significant disabilities, including youth with the most significant disabilities, to enable such individuals to achieve an employment outcome of supported employment in competitive integrated employment.

(Pub. L. 93–112, title VI, §602, formerly §621, as added Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, §409, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1214; amended Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title VIII, §402(b)(12)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–414; renumbered §602 and amended Pub. L. 113–128, title IV, §461(3), (4), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1679.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in section 795j of this title prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 105–220.

A prior section 795g, Pub. L. 93–112, title VI, §621, as added Pub. L. 95–602, title II, §201, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2993; amended Pub. L. 98–221, title I, §§162, 163, Feb. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 29, 30; Pub. L. 99–506, title I, §103(d)(2)(B), (C), title VII, §703(a)(1)–(3), (b)–(d), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1810, 1831, 1832; Pub. L. 100–630, title II, §207(b), Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3313; Pub. L. 102–569, title VI, §611, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4434, related to Projects With Industry, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 105–220.

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–128, §461(4), substituted "this subchapter" for "this part" and "individuals with the most significant disabilities, including youth with the most significant disabilities, to enable such individuals to achieve an employment outcome of supported employment in competitive integrated employment." for "individuals with the most significant disabilities to enable such individuals to achieve the employment outcome of supported employment."

1998—Pub. L. 105–277 made technical amendment to section designation and catchline in original.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-32 July 27, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC TO DISCUSS

NEW REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS FOR SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting Thursday, August 3, in

San Clemente, Calif., to discuss the new reactor oversight process for San Onofre Nuclear Generating

Station, a nuclear power plant operated by Southern California Edison Company.

The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. at the San Clemente Community Center, Multi-Purpose

Room, 100 N. Calle Seville, San Clemente. Anyone who would like to learn more about the new

oversight process or ask questions of NRC officials is invited to attend.

The new program was implemented nationwide in early April after a six-month pilot test

conducted at 13 nuclear power plants at nine sites from May to November 1999. It uses more

objective, timely, and safety-significant criteria in assessing performance, while seeking to more

effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. It also takes into account improvements in the

performance of the nuclear industry over the past twenty years.

Under the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based

personnel are supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators.

These performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant performance, including the

viability of redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection, and security.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s internet website every three months, along with semi-annual updates to each plant's inspection

plans. Current performance information for SONGS Units 2 and 3 can be found at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SANO2/sano2_chart.html

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SANO3/sano3_chart.html

A plain language summary of the new inspection and assessment program is available from the

NRC Office of Public Affairs or on the website at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

###
§ 130.310 Area of service. ( a ) The AA/SBDC will designate, in the cooperative agreement, the geographic area of service of each recipient organization. Generally, no more than one recipient organization may be located in a state. ( 1 ) The AA/SBDC may determine that making awards to multiple recipient organizations in a state is necessary to more effectively implement the Program and provide services to all interested small businesses.
( 2 ) Once the Administration has entered into a cooperative agreement, a subsequent decision to change the recipient organization's area of service will be considered a non-renewal or termination. This decision will be subject to the procedures outlined in § 130.700.
( b ) The recipient organization must locate its Lead Center and SBDC service centers in the designated area of service to ensure that services are readily accessible to all small businesses within the designated area of service.
( c ) Any applicant commencing after January 1, 1992, must ensure that any new SBDC service centers established within its area of service, to the extent practicable, are primarily housed within institutions of higher education or a WBC operating pursuant to section 29 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656) as stated in section 21(a)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648(a)(1)).
( d ) The allocation of resources, including site locations of the Lead Center and the SBDC service centers, will be reviewed for adequacy of coverage by SBA as part of the application review process for each budget period.
[88 FR 76642, Nov. 7, 2023]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-68 October 4, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING ON

CHANGES IN REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROGRAM AT INDIAN POINT PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for Wednesday, October

11, in Cortlandt Manor, N.Y., to discuss the agency’s new reactor oversight process. Indian Point

Units 2 &3, two of the nation’s 103 operating commercial nuclear power plants, are located in

Buchanan, N.Y.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m., at the Cortlandt Town Hall, 1 Heady Street. Members of the

public will have the opportunity to ask questions about the new program of NRC staff during and after

the meeting.

The new oversight process, which began at Indian Point in April, uses more objective, timely

and safety-significant criteria in assessing performance while seeking to more effectively and

efficiently regulate the industry. Under the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and

regional office-based personnel are supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called

performance indicators. These performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant

operations, including the viability of redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation

protection and security measures.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s web site every three months. The safety significance of each inspection finding or performance

indicator is characterized by a color -- green, white, yellow or red.

The NRC response to the inspection finding and performance indicators will be based on the

significance of the items. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow or red

assessments receive increasing NRC involvement. Multiple red findings could result in a plant

shutdown.

A plain language summary of the reactor oversight process is available from the NRC Office of

Public Affairs or on the web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm . Detailed information regarding

the reactor oversight process is available at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html .

###
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-29   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 1 of 2

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-29   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 22, 2019 a0319

Order 

Clerk

March 22, 2019

156445

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156445

COA: 332081

Wayne CC: 15-005481-FH

JOEL EUSEVIO DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

By order of May 4, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the July 13, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decisions in People v 

Davis (Docket No. 156406) and People v Price (Docket No. 156180). 

On order of the Court, we VACATE that part of our May 4, 2018 order that held 

this application in abeyance for People v Price (Docket No. 156180). People v Davis

(Docket No. 156406) having been decided on March 22, 2019, ___ Mich ___ (2019), the 

application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO: 20-23287-CV-GAYLES/OTAZO-REYES

LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

IMPERIAL BRANDS, et al., 

Defendants. 

______________________________________/ 

ORDER ON STATUS CONFERENCE

THIS CAUSE came before the Court for Telephonic Status Conference held on September 

27, 2021. In accordance with the undersigned’s rulings at the Status Conference, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery [D.E. 

97] is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiffs shall have 60 days from the date of this Order to conduct 

jurisdictional discovery. This deadline will be strictly enforced. It is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendants WPP PLC, 

Young & Rubicam LLC, and BCW LLC’s (collectively, “WPP Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss 

[D.E. 93] 10 days after the close of jurisdictional discovery. The undersigned will set this and 

other pending Motions to Dismiss for Zoom hearing by separate order. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 27th day of September, 

2021. 

____________________________________ 

ALICIA M. OTAZO-REYES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

cc: United States District Judge Darrin P. Gayles

Counsel of Record 

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 133 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2021 Page 1 of 1
#### John J. Fitzgibbon, Respondent, v. Laura D. Stork, Defendant, and William A. Stork, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
§ 127.41 Government title to unclaimed and abandoned merchandise. ( a ) *Vesting of title in Government.* At the end of the 6-month period noted in § 127.11 of this part, at which time merchandise having thus remained in Customs custody is considered as unclaimed and abandoned, the port director, with the concurrence of the Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, may, in lieu of sale of the merchandise as provided in subpart C of this part, provide notice to all known interested parties under paragraph (b) of this section that the title to such merchandise will be considered as vesting in the United States, free and clear of any liens or encumbrances, as of the 30th day after the date of the notice unless, before the 30th day, the merchandise is entered or withdrawn for consumption and all duties, taxes, fees, transfer and storage charges, and any other expenses that may have accrued on the merchandise are paid.
( b ) *Notice to known interested parties.* Notice that the title to unclaimed and abandoned merchandise will vest in the United States, as described in paragraph (a) of this section, will be sent to the following parties on Customs Form (CF) 5251, appropriately modified, or other similar Customs document as designated by the port director or an electronic equivalent as authorized by Customs: ( 1 ) Importer, if known;
( 2 ) Consignee, if name and address can be ascertained;
( 3 ) Shipper, or the shipper's representative or agent, if merchandise is consigned to order or the consignee cannot be ascertained; and
( 4 ) Any other known interested parties.
( c ) *Appraisement of merchandise.* Before title to unclaimed and abandoned merchandise is vested in the United States, the merchandise will be appraised in accordance with section 402, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1401a).
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 579 

AN ACT 

To make a technical correction to the ALS Disability 

Insurance Access Act of 2019. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 579 ES

1 SECTION 1. RETROACTIVE ACCESS TO SOCIAL SECURITY 

2 DISABILITY BENEFITS INDIVIDUALS WITH 

3 AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS (ALS). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2(b) of the ALS Dis5 ability Insurance Access Act of 2019 (Public Law 116– 

6 250) is amended by striking ‘‘applications for disability 

7 insurance benefits filed after the date of enactment of this 

8 Act’’ and inserting ‘‘applications for disability insurance 

9 benefits approved after the date that is 5 months before 

10 the date of enactment of this Act’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 this section shall take effect as if included in the enact13 ment of the ALS Disability Insurance Access Act of 2019 

14 (Public Law 116–250). 

Passed the Senate March 3, 2021. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 579 

AN ACT 

To make a technical correction to the ALS 

Disability Insurance Access Act of 2019.
<PAGE>

DEARBORN BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q (continued)

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and accompanies the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") of
Dearborn Bancorp, Inc. (the "Issuer").

         I, Michael J. Ross, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Issuer, certify that:

         (i)      The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.



Dated: August 10, 2003

                                                /s/  Michael J. Ross
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                                    Michael J. Ross
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer,
                                                   Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-98-67 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Monday, December 21, 1998)

NRC STAFF SETS ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE WITH FP&L

TO DISCUSS ST. LUCIE FIRE PROTECTION COMPLIANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a predecisional enforcement

conference in Atlanta on Thursday, January 7, to discuss with Florida Power & Light Company

officials apparent violations of NRC fire protection requirements at the St. Lucie nuclear power

plant, located on Hutchinson Island near Ft. Pierce, Florida.

The meeting will be held from 1:00 to 3:00 p.m. at the NRC’s Region II office, located in

the Atlanta Federal Center at 61 Forsyth Street on the 24th floor. It is open to observation by

interested members of the public and news media representatives. NRC officials will be

available at its conclusion to answer questions from interested observers.

NRC officials said the agency will discuss with company representatives four apparent

violations involving deficiencies in the plant’s fire protection program, identified in connection

with an NRC Fire Protection Functional Inspection at the plant which NRC inspectors

conducted earlier this year.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that a

determination has been made that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be

taken. The purpose is to discuss the apparent violations, their causes and safety significance;

to provide the licensee with an opportunity to point out errors that may have been made in NRC

inspection reports; and to enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a

civil penalty, will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at

a later time.

#
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eduardo SANCHEZ-GALVAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-51181.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Eduardo Sanchez-Galvan raises ar*349guments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *349published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.748 Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in Australia. ( a ) *General.* This section sets forth the rules which apply for purposes of obtaining duty-free treatment on goods returned after repair or alteration in Australia as provided for in subheadings 9802.00.40 and 9802.00.50, HTSUS. Goods returned after having been repaired or altered in Australia, whether or not pursuant to a warranty, are eligible for duty-free treatment, provided that the requirements of this section are met. For purposes of this section, “repairs or alterations” means restoration, addition, renovation, re-dyeing, cleaning, re-sterilizing, or other treatment which does not destroy the essential characteristics of, or create a new or commercially different good from, the good exported from the United States. The term “repair or alternation” does not include an operation or process that transforms an unfinished good into a finished good.
( b ) *Goods not eligible for duty-free treatment after repair or alteration.* The duty-free treatment referred to in paragraph (a) of this section will not apply to goods which, in their condition as exported from the United States to Australia, are incomplete for their intended use and for which the processing operation performed in Australia constitutes an operation that is performed as a matter of course in the preparation or manufacture of finished goods.
( c ) *Documentation.* The provisions of § 10.8(a) through (c) of this part, relating to the documentary requirements for goods entered under subheading 9802.00.40 or 9802.00.50, HTSUS, will apply in connection with the entry of goods which are returned from Australia after having been exported for repairs or alterations and which are claimed to be duty free.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [NM-952-05-1420-BJ]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The plats of survey described below are scheduled to be officially filed in the New Mexico State  Office, Bureau of Land Management, Santa Fe, New Mexico,  thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this publication.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Indian Meridian, Oklahoma

The Plat representing the dependent resurvey and survey in Township 10 North, Range 26 East, of the Arkansas River and Historic Riverbed, accepted September 28, 2004, for Group 61 Oklahoma.

If a protest against a survey, as shown on any of the above plats is received prior to the date of official filing, the filing will be stayed pending consideration of the protest. A plat will not be officially filed until the day after all protests have been dismissed and become final or appeals from the dismissal affirmed.

A person or party who wishes to protest against any of these surveys must file a written protest with the New Mexico State Director, Bureau of Land Management, stating that they wish to protest.

A statement of reasons for a protest may be filed with the notice of protest to the State Director, or the statement of reasons must be filed with the State Director within thirty (30) days after the protest is filed.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

These plats will be available for inspection in the New Mexico State Office, Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502-0115. Copies may be obtained from this office upon payment of $1.10 per sheet.

Dated: October 7, 2004.

Jay Innes,

Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor for New Mexico.

[FR Doc. 04-23364 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M