alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-24 June 7, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC TO DISCUSS

NEW REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS FOR COMANCHE PEAK

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting Tuesday, June 13, in

Glen Rose, Texas, to discuss the new reactor oversight process for Comanche Peak, a nuclear power

plant operated by TXU Electric.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. at the Glen Rose Expo Center, 202 Bo Gibbs Dr., in Glen

Rose. Anyone who would like to learn more about the new oversight process or ask questions of NRC

officials is invited to attend.

The new program was implemented nationwide in early April after a six-month pilot test

conducted at 13 nuclear power plants at nine sites from May to November 1999. It uses more

objective, timely, and safety-significant criteria in assessing performance, while seeking to more

effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. It also takes into account improvements in the

performance of the nuclear industry over the past twenty years.

Under the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based

personnel are supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators.

These performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant performance, including the

viability of redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection, and security.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s internet website every three months, along with semi-annual updates to each plant's inspection

plans. Current performance information for Comanche Peak can be found at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CP1/cp1_chart.html

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CP2/cp2_chart.html

A plain language summary of the new inspection and assessment program is available from the

NRC Office of Public Affairs or on the website at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

###
-cr-06219-WDF Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/03/2001 P
-cr-06219-WDF Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/03/2001 P
-cr-06219-WDF Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/03/2001 P
-cr-06219-WDF Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/03/2001 P
-cr-06219-WDF Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/03/2001 P
-cr-06219-WDF Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/03/2001 P
### §163. Right to strike preserved

Nothing in this subchapter, except as specifically provided for herein, shall be construed so as either to interfere with or impede or diminish in any way the right to strike, or to affect the limitations or qualifications on that right.

(July 5, 1935, ch. 372, §13, 49 Stat. 457; June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title I, §101, 61 Stat. 151.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1947—Act June 23, 1947, amended section so as to provide that except as specifically provided for in this subchapter nothing shall interfere with or diminish the right to strike and that nothing was to be construed to affect the limitations or qualifications on the right to strike, thus recognizing that the right to strike is not an unlimited and unqualified right.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1947 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by act June 23, 1947, see section 104 of act June 23, 1947, set out as a note under section 151 of this title.
### §5345. Annotated United States Code for Members of House of Representatives to be paid for from Members' Representational Allowance

#### (a) In general

The Clerk of the House of Representatives shall, at the request of a Member of the House of Representatives, furnish to the Member, for official use only, one set of a privately published annotated version of the United States Code, including supplements and pocket parts. The furnishing of a set of the United States Code under this section shall be in lieu of any distribution under section 212 of title 1 and shall be paid for from the Members' Representational Allowance.

#### (b) "Member of the House of Representatives" defined

As used in this section, the term "Member of the House of Representatives" means a Representative in, or a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress.

#### (c) Regulations

The Committee on House Oversight of the House of Representatives shall have authority to prescribe regulations to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 104–186, title I, §107, Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1723.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 54 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is comprised of section 107 of Pub. L. 104–186. Subsec. (d) of section 107 of Pub. L. 104–186 repealed former section 54 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on House Oversight of House of Representatives changed to Committee on House Administration of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Jan. 6, 1999.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—CAPITOL GUIDE SERVICE AND OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL ACCESSIBILITY SERVICES
Order entered July 23, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 14

- 00853

- CV

CRAIG S. PITTMAN AND KELLY KONCAK PITTMAN , Appellant

V.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MOR TGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial Dist rict Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 14

- 00396



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant s ’ motion for extension of time to file their notice of appeal.

The Court GRANTS the motion. Appellants’ June 30, 2014 notice of appeal shall be treate d as

timely filed for jurisdictional purposes.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>
Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2015 6:23 PM
To: Vasu, Amy
Cc: Szabo, Aaron; Culligan, Kevin; Harvey, Reid; Tsirigotis, Peter Subject: RE: Revised CPP final rule package and RIA

Thanks all,

Please have the final CLEAN versions of the rule document and RIA uploaded to ROCIS in the appropriate places.

Please upload the rule under “primary documents” and RIA under “supplementary documents.”

Thanks very much.

Nathan

From: Vasu, Amy
Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2015 5:58 PM
To: Frey, Nathan J.
Cc: Szabo, Aaron; Culligan, Kevin; Harvey, Reid; Tsirigotis, Peter Subject: Revised CPP final rule package and RIA

Nathan,

Attached are the revised Clean Power Plan final rule package and the RIA and spreadsheets for the CPP final rule. Clean and RLSO versions of the final rule and RIA are attached.

Thank you.

Amy

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Amy B. Vasu U.S. EPA / OAQPS Sector Policies and Programs Division email: vasu.amy@epa.gov phone: 919.541.0107
### Part C—Workforce Investment Activities Providers
#### § 9260.0-1 Purpose.

This part establishes a single regulatory section in title 43 where the law enforcement provisions of all the various public land use regulations can be found.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
 Dated: November 10, 2005/s / Jeffrey L. KarafaJeffrey L. KarafaTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer,Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
U.S. Department of the Interior  U.S. Geological Survey

| Version       1.0                          |
|---------------------------------------------|
| U.S. GEOLOGICAL       SURVEY BULLETIN 2136 |

Kinematics of the Short Hill Fault—Late   Paleozoic  Contractional Reactivation of an Early Paleozoic  Extensional Fault, Blue Ridge-South Mountain  Anticlinorium, Northern Virginia and Southern Maryland

By Scott Southworth

*Geology, kinematics, and tectonic   setting of  a Paleozoic fault of complex history*

----

MAIN PAGE
BACK OF TITLE PAGE
CONTENTS

----
### §4506. Death gratuity payments as gifts

Any death gratuity payment at any time specifically appropriated by any Act of Congress or at any time made out of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives or the contingent fund of the Senate shall be held to have been a gift.

(June 5, 1952, ch. 369, Ch. I, 66 Stat. 101; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §203(6), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1725.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified identically to sections 38b and 125a of this title. Section 38b was omitted from the Code and section 125a was editorially reclassified and renumbered as this section.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "applicable accounts of the House of Representatives or the contingent fund" for "contingent fund of the House of Representatives or".
IZ.51Z I , Z:DL 1-'1V1 LJEIMO IVIICHael aria 1 1111 IVIelSUSII 

I have a complete thread between Shay and John the says otherwise 

Jul 25, 2020, 10:13 PM 

Dame Michael 

Complaint says that's a lie 

Jul 25, 2020, 10:13 PM 

Chuck Bradley 

The one he quit using 3 years ago just got to expensive.7the same one Shay says was cheaper and 

switched to. But like offered to look at any barrel and replace it. Fact is Shay modified it to failure 

and why he wouldn't return any 

Jul 25, 2.020, 10:12 PM 

Dame Michael 

The Joy's of ISO cert 

Jul 25, 2020, 10:11 PM 

Dame Michael 

6061 is 6061 

Jul 2.5, 2020, 10:11 PM 

Dame Michael 

We build fixtures with stuff from multiple vendors 

Jul 2.5, 2020, 10:10 PM 

Dame Michael 

If its the same grade who cares 

Jul 25, 2020, 10:10 PM 

Chuck Bradley 

Luke hasn't hid the fact he used 2 different manufactures 416r stainless 

Jul 25, 2020, 10:09 PM 

file:///a/Users/HaganW/Desktop/amessage_1.111m1 63/211 

SCI 000716 CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-142 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 2
IZOIZ I , 2:DZ ry utlneviceeao 1 1111 vanUoI 

Odd that he was able to pinpoint the exact steel that was switched out to in the time between the 

two complaints 

Jul 25, 2020, 10:08 PM 

Chuck Bradley 

Talking about 2 different steels , he told me it was all 416r from different companies and that they 

hadn't used the bq5 for over 3 years 

Jul 25, 2020, 10:06 PM 

Dame Michael 

What text? 

Jul 25, 2020, 10:05 PM 

Chuck Bradley 

I was a little shocked by that text from Luke myself 

Jul 25, 2020, 10:04 PM 

Dame Michael 

The finish steel that he mentions in the new complaint, how did he come up with that? 

Jul 25, 2020, 9:57 PM 

Dame Michael 

Since shay paraded his military benefit build Luke should point out his military contracts 

Jul 25, 2020, 9:54 PM 

Dame Michael 

Let's hope fed court seems this for the BS it is and tells them to kick rocks 

Jul 25, 2020, 9:53 PM 

Chuck Bradley 

I dint think fiato can handle this as a moonlighted , wouldn't be surprised if he didn't back out now 

file:///ClUsers/HaganW/Desktop/amessage_thtml 64/211 

SCI 000717 CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-142 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 111.32 False information.

A broker must not file or procure or assist in the filing of any claim, or of any document, affidavit, or other papers, known by such broker to be false. In addition, a broker must not give, or solicit or procure the giving of, any information or testimony that the broker knew or should have known was false or misleading in any matter pending before the Department of Homeland Security or to any representative of the Department of Homeland Security. A broker also must document and report to CBP when the broker separates from or cancels representation of a client as a result of determining the client is intentionally attempting to use the broker to defraud the U.S. Government or commit any criminal act against the U.S. Government. The report to CBP must include the client name, date of separation or cancellation, and reason for the separation or cancellation.

[CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63318, Oct. 18, 2022]
§ 148.17 Declaration on arrival incidental to further foreign travel. ( a ) *Declaration on incidental arrival.* A resident who enters the United States merely as an incident of foreign travel and who will continue his foreign travel before finally returning to the United States from a continuous trip must declare, but need not clear through CBP, any articles he has acquired or had repaired or altered while abroad. The incidental character of the arrival must be made known to the CBP officer.
( b ) *Treatment of articles on incidental arrival.* In order that a resident may claim the $800 or $1,600 exemption upon his final arrival in the United States from a continuous trip, articles accompanying him at the time of an incidental arrival may be exported directly from CBP custody or after transportation in bond, or the articles may be left in CBP custody if the resident upon his final return is to arrive at the CBP facility where the articles are deposited.
( c ) *Failure to advise of incidental character of arrival.* If the traveler fails to advise the CBP officer of the incidental character of his arrival, or for other reason declares any articles for allowance of the $800 or $1,600 exemption, such declaration will mark the beginning of the respective period or periods during which a further exemption cannot be granted.
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 86-118, 51 FR 22516, June 20, 1986; T.D. 97-75, 62 FR 46441, Sept. 3, 1997; CBP Dec. 09-37, 74 FR 48854, Sept. 25, 2009]
### §5122. Personal services in office of Speaker; payments

There shall be paid from the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives until otherwise provided by law, for personal services in the office of the Speaker of the House, an additional basic sum of $10,000 per annum.

(Pub. L. 87–730, §103, Oct. 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 693; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(14), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1732.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 74–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is based on House Resolution No. 487, Eighty-seventh Congress, Jan. 10, 1962, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 87–730.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "applicable accounts of the House of Representatives" for "contingent fund of the House".
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-049-CR

SHANE CODY HICKSON	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

						----------

	We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). 								 													

						PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: July 9, 2009
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-129 September 26, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF WITHDRAWS PROPOSED FINE AGAINST

VA MEDICAL CENTER IN PHILADELPHIA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has withdrawn a fine

proposed September 18, 1996, against the Department of Veterans

Affairs Medical Center in Philadelphia for an alleged violation

of NRC requirements.

An $8,000 civil penalty was proposed based on a finding by

the Department of Labor that the Radiation Safety Officer was

discriminated against after she raised safety concerns to the

NRC.

In its response to the NRC, VA-Philadelphia admitted the

violation, but requested that the NRC reconsider the

determination that a supervisor’s censure of the radiation safety

officer constituted a violation warrranting a civil penalty.

In support of that request, the VA said the supervisor

chastised the employee, not just for telephoning the NRC, but for

failing to notify him of certain information of which she was

aware. The VA also contended that the chastisement was an

isolated occurrence, that other employees were not “chilled” by

this event from raising safety concerns, and that the violation

did not involve a high potential for impact on the public.

After reviewing the VA response, the NRC staff conducted an

investigation which did not substantiate that the radiation

safety officer had suffered continued discrimination because of

her contact with the NRC in November 1995. NRC also has

determined that the chastisement of the employee did not

substantially affect conditions of her employment, that she

received an apology from the VA, and that she remains the

radiation safety officer. The agency has further been advised

that the VA has met terms and conditions of remedies outlined by

the Labor Department when it issued its finding.

After considering all available information, the NRC has now

concluded that the civil penalty should be withdrawn.
In the letter to the VA Medical Center, James Lieberman,

Director of the NRC’s Office of Enforcement, said “We note that

recent NRC inspections have found problems that collectively

indicate communication issues and poor working relationships may

exist at your facility. The NRC continues to be concerned that

these problems could adversely impact radiological safety at your

facility. The NRC is presently reviewing the results of these

inspections and will continue to closely monitor activities

conducted under your license.”

#
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING

56 Forsyth Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

David J. Smith

Clerk of Court 

November 10, 2021

For rules and forms visit

www.ca11.uscourts.gov

Clerk - Southern District of Florida

U.S. District Court 

400 N MIAMI AVE

MIAMI, FL 33128-1810

Appeal Number: 21-12374-JJ

Case Style: Bianca Digennaro v. Michael Malgrat, et al

District Court Docket No: 4:20-cv-10094-KMM

The enclosed copy of the Clerk's Entry of Dismissal pursuant to appellant's motion to dismiss is 

issued as the mandate of this court. See 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a). 

Sincerely,

DAVID J. SMITH, Clerk of Court

Reply to: Tiffany A. Tucker, JJ/lt

Phone #: (404)335-6193

Enclosure(s)

DIS-3 Letter and Entry of Dismissal Vol

USCA11 Case: 21-12374 Date Filed: 11/10/2021 Page: 1 of 2

AP Nov 10, 2021 MIAMI

Case 4:20-cv-10094-KMM Document 82 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/15/2021 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

______________

No. 21-12374-JJ

______________ 

BIANCA DIGENNARO, 

as the legal guardian of HMM, a minor,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL L. MALGRAT, 

KENNETH J.W. WAITE, 

FRED C. SIMS, 

CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA,

 Defendants - Appellees,

ASHLEY N. HENRIQUEZ, et al.,

 Defendants.

__________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

__________________________________________

ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to Appellant Bianca Digennaro's motion for voluntary 

dismissal, FRAP Rule 42 and 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a), the above referenced appeal was duly 

entered dismissed on this date, effective November 10, 2021. 

DAVID J. SMITH

Clerk of Court of the United States Court

of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

by: Tiffany A. Tucker, JJ, Deputy Clerk

FOR THE COURT - BY DIRECTION 

USCA11 Case: 21-12374 Date Filed: 11/10/2021 Page: 2 of 2

Case 4:20-cv-10094-KMM Document 82 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/15/2021 Page 2 of 2
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-056 May 9, 2001

NRC’S OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL SCHEDULES CONFERENCE MAY 21

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Office of the Inspector General will hold its annual

Information and Planning Conference on May 21. The theme for this year’s conference is “NRC’s New

Regulatory Approach and How Effective Communication is Key.”

Following welcoming remarks by Inspector General Hubert T. Bell, NRC Chairman Richard A.

Meserve will deliver the keynote address discussing the importance of open and clear communication.

Next will be two discussion panels to address effective communication as it relates to the NRC’s

reactors program and the nuclear materials program. Representatives from public interest groups, the

States, and the NRC will participate on the panels and respond to questions from the audience as time

allows.

The OIG independently and objectively conducts audits and investigations to help improve the

efficiency and effectiveness of NRC’s programs and operations and strives to prevent and detect agency

fraud, waste, and abuse. Information and insights from the conference will help the OIG plan its

activities for the coming year to effect positive change in the agency.

The conference, which is open to the public, will be held from 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon in the

Commissioner’s Conference Room at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. It will be telecasted

to NRC’s four regional offices where interested members of the public are invited to listen. The

regional offices are located in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania; Atlanta, Georgia; Lisle, Illinois; and

Arlington, Texas.

For further information, contact Cheryl Montgomery-White at 301-415-8058 or Russ

Irish at (301) 415-5972. A detailed agenda along with a list of participants is available at:

www.nrc.gov/NRC/PUBLIC/PMNS/oig1.pdf on NRC’s web site.

###
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-81275-CV-MIDDLEBROOKS/Brannon

NELSON FERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

DIAMONDS BY RAYMOND LEE, LLC,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

 

ORDER CLOSING CASE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Dismissal 

with Prejudice (“Stipulation”) (DE 22), filed on January 20, 2021. The Court congratulates the 

Parties on their amicable resolution of this matter and notes that pursuant to Anago Franchising, 

Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012), the Parties’ Stipulation is self-executing and no 

order of the Court is required to dismiss this action. Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that 

(1) The above-styled action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

(2) The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this CASE and DENY all pending motions AS 

MOOT.

SIGNED in Chambers in West Palm Beach, Florida, this 27th day of January, 2021.

Donald M. Middlebrooks

United States District Judge

Copies to: Counsel of Record

Case 9:20-cv-81275-DMM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/27/2021 Page 1 of 1