alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInfrared horizon sensor modeling for attitude determination and control: Analysis and mission experienceThe work performed by the Attitude Determination and Control Section at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Goddard Space Flight Center in analyzing and evaluating the performance of infrared horizon sensors is presented. The results of studies performed during the 1960s are reviewed; several models for generating the Earth's infrared radiance profiles are presented; and the Horizon Radiance Modeling Utility, the software used to model the horizon sensor optics and electronics processing to computer radiance-dependent attitude errors, is briefly discussed. Also provided is mission experience from 12 spaceflight missions spanning the period from 1973 to 1984 and using a variety of horizon sensing hardware. Recommendations are presented for future directions for the infrared horizon sensing technology.Document ID19850010706Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPhenneger, M. C.*(Computer Sciences Corp. Silver Spring, Md., United States)*Singhal, S. P.*(Computer Sciences Corp. Silver Spring, Md., United States)*Lee, T. H.*(Computer Sciences Corporation Silver Spring, Md., United States)*Stengle, T. H.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1985Subject CategorySpacecraft InstrumentationReport/Patent NumberREPT-85B0147NASA-TM-86181NAS 1.15:86181Accession Number85N19016Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850010706.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does
hereby certify that the foregoing Annual Report of CLAIMSNET.COM INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the
"Report"):

     (1) Fully complies with the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) Fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
         result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Don Crosbie

Don Crosbie
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 26, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32

Securities
and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eastern American Natural Gas Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a
separate disclosure document.

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.,
Trustee, Trustee for Eastern American Natural Gas TrustBy:

/s/ MIKE ULRICH Vice PresidentThe Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.


Date:
May 5, 2011

---



QuickLinks
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-136 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Wednesday, October 9,

1996)

NRC NAMES DR. GEORGE M. HORNBERGER

TO ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has appointed Dr. George

M. Hornberger, a professor at the University of Virginia, to the

Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW).

Dr. Hornberger is the Ernest H. Ern Professor of

Environmental Sciences at the University of Virginia, whose

faculty he joined in 1970. He has served as a visiting professor

at Stanford and the U.S. Geological Survey. Dr. Hornberger

received his bachelors and masters degrees from Drexel University

and his doctorate from Stanford.

A member of the Geological Society of America and the

American Geophysical Union, Dr. Hornberger won the Robert E.

Horton Award (Hydrology Section) from the American Geophysical

Union in 1993.

The purpose of the ACNW is to provide advice to NRC on

nuclear waste

disposal facilities.

Other ACNW members are:

Dr. B. John Garrick, Chairman of the Board, PLG, Inc., Newport

Beach, CA;

Dr. William J. Hinze, Professor, Department of Earth and

Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN;

Dr. Paul W. Pomeroy, Research Seismologist and President, Rondout

Associates, Port Ewen, NY.

#
### §§29b, 29c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 29b, based on section 204 of House Resolution No. 988, Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 8, 1974, which was enacted into permanent law, effective Jan. 2, 1975, by Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777, established a Commission on Information and Facilities in House of Representatives to be composed of nine members of the House appointed by Speaker, required Speaker to appoint an Advisory Council to assist Commission in carrying out its functions, required Commission to conduct study of informational problems, facilities and space, and House legislative counsel requirements, provided for the scope of study of informational problems, and required Commission to make an annual progress report to Speaker, to complete study of House legislative counsel requirements by Jan. 1, 1976, and to submit a final report by Jan. 2, 1977.

Section 29c, based on clause 10, rule I, of the Rules of the House of Representatives as in effect before July 17, 1984, relating to the Office for the Bicentennial for the House of Representatives, established by House Resolution No. 621, Ninety-seventh Congress, Dec. 17, 1982, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 98–367, title I, §102, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 479, established in House of Representatives an Office for the Bicentennial of the House of Representatives to coordinate planning of commemoration of two-hundredth anniversary of House of Representatives and to be staffed by a professional historian appointed by Speaker without regard to political affiliation and solely on basis of fitness to perform duties of the position and to serve at pleasure of Speaker, and provided that the Office cease to exist not later than Sept. 30, 1989, unless otherwise provided by law or resolution. Office of the Historian of the House of Representatives was established by clause 10, rule I, of the Rules of the House of Representatives, as added on Jan. 3, 1989 (H. Res. 5, 101st Congress).
EXHIBIT 32

Securities
and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eastern American Natural Gas Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a
separate disclosure document.

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.,
Trustee, Trustee for Eastern American Natural Gas
TrustBy:

/s/ MIKE ULRICH Vice PresidentThe Bank of New York Mellon Trust
Company, N.A.


Date:
August 6, 2010

---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of National Drug Control Policy

# AGENCY:

Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP).

# ACTION:

Notice of appointments.

# SUMMARY:

The following persons have been appointed to the ONDCP Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board: Ms. Michele Marx, Mr. Joseph Keefe, Ms. Christine Morden and Mr. Robert Denniston.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

Please direct any questions to Linda V. Priebe, Assistant General Counsel, (202) 395-6622, Office of National Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC 20503.

Linda V. Priebe,

Assistant General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 04-23255 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3180-02-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 137080 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137080 

 COA: 276080 

Ottawa CC: 06-029985-FH 

RONALD ALBERT VANDEBERG,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 26, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.302 Eligibility criteria in general. Subject to the more specific explanations of the criteria in §§ 10.303 and 10.305 of this part, goods classifiable under an HTSUS heading or subheading for which the symbol “CA” appears in the “special” column are eligible for a preference if: ( a ) *Originating goods.* The goods originate in Canada or the United States, or both, and
( b ) *Direct shipment required.* Except as provided in § 10.306(b), are directly shipped to the United States from Canada.
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.861 Scope.

This subpart implements the duty preference and related customs provisions applicable to imported goods under the United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement (the OFTA) signed on January 19, 2006, and under the United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (the Act; 120 Stat. 1191). Except as otherwise specified in this subpart, the procedures and other requirements set forth in this subpart are in addition to the customs procedures and requirements of general application contained elsewhere in this chapter. Additional provisions implementing certain aspects of the OFTA and the Act are contained in Parts 24, 162, and 163 of this chapter.
#### Betty Moorehead, as Administratrix of the Estate of Frank Moorehead, Deceased, Appellant, v. City of New York, Defendant, and American Ice Company, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS FILED
AS PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000895519
<NAME>                          CHIC BY H I S INC
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000       
                                                                 
<S>                             <C>                              
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-2-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-3-1997      
<CASH>                                           49,632        
<SECURITIES>                                          0        
<RECEIVABLES>                                    29,411        
<ALLOWANCES>                                        191        
<INVENTORY>                                      80,077        
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                164,158        
<PP&E>                                           97,409        
<DEPRECIATION>                                   28,198        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  235,869        
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           100,872        
<BONDS>                                          28,950        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0       
<PREFERRED>                                           0        
<COMMON>                                             98        
<OTHER-SE>                                       87,986        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    235,869        
<SALES>                                         122,473        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                157,854        
<CGS>                                            99,965        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    38,779        
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     91        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2,689        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  16,330        
<INCOME-TAX>                                      7,654        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               8,676        
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0        
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (330)                 
<CHANGES>                                             0        
<NET-INCOME>                                      8,346        
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.86        
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.86        
                                                         

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-CV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v. 

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP,

INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al., 

Defendants.

/

JOINT NOTICE OF APPEAL

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 3 and 4, 

Defendants Lisa McElhone and Joseph LaForte, Individually and as Beneficiaries Of The LME 2017 

Trust, hereby jointly appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit from the 

Paperless Order Denying their Motion to Modify the Preliminary Injunction (ECF 1566). 

Dated: July 14, 2023. 

KAPLAN ZEENA LLP

Attorneys for Defendant Lisa McElhone 

2 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 3050 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 530-0800 

Facsimile: (305) 530-0801 

 

By: /s/ James M. Kaplan 

JAMES M. KAPLAN 

Florida Bar No.: 921040 

james.kaplan@kaplanzeena.com 

elizabeth.salom@kaplanzeena.com

service@kaplanzeena.com 

NOAH E. SNYDER

Florida Bar No.: 107415 

noah.snyder@kaplanzeena.com 

maria.escobales@kaplanzeena.com

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1640 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2023 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

KOPELOWITZ OSTROW FERGUSON 

WEISELBERG GILBERT

Attorneys for Appellant Joseph W. LaForte 

One W. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 500 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Tel: (954) 525-4100 

By: /s/ David L. Ferguson 

DAVID L. FERGUSON

Florida Bar Number: 0981737 

Ferguson@kolawyers.com 

SETH D. HAIMOVITCH

Florida Bar Number: 0085939 

Haimovitch@kolawyers.com 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 14th day of July, 2023, I electronically filed the forgoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is 

being served this day on counsel of record via transmissions of Notices of Electronic Filing generated 

by CM/ECF. 

By: /s/ James M. Kaplan 

 JAMES M. KAPLAN 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1640 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 127.4 General order period defined.

The general order period is that period of time during which general order merchandise, as defined in § 127.1, is not subject to sale. The general order period expires 6 months from the date of importation.

[T.D. 79-221, 44 FR 46814, Aug. 9, 1979, as amended by T.D. 98-74, 63 FR 51290, Sept. 25, 1998]
#### Franklin Savings Bank in the City of New York, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [179 Misc. 774.]
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93018, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 134.0 Scope.

This part sets forth regulations implementing the country of origin marking requirements and exceptions of section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), together with certain marking provisions of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202). The consequences and procedures to be followed when articles are not legally marked are set forth in this part. The consequences and procedures to be followed when articles are falsely marked are set forth in § 11.13 of this chapter. Special marking and labeling requirements are covered elsewhere. Provisions regarding the review and appeal rights of exporters and producers resulting from adverse North American Free Trade Agreement marking decisions are contained in subpart J of part 181 of this chapter.

[T.D. 81-290, 46 FR 58070, Nov. 30, 1981, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51255, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 94-1, 58 FR 69471, Dec. 30, 1993]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-117 October 26, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of Northeast Utilities tomorrow to discuss plans,

schedules and progress toward recovery of Millstone Unit 2.

The meeting, which begins at 1:00 p.m., will be held in the

Leland F. Sillin Training Center at the Millstone site. It is

open to the public for observation.

#
§ 80.13 Application information. ( a ) An application for acquisition of property for the purpose of open space must include: ( 1 ) A photograph that represents the appearance of each property site at the time of application;
( 2 ) Assurances that the subapplicant will implement the project grant award in compliance with subparts C and D of this part;
( 3 ) The deed restriction language, which must be consistent with the FEMA model deed restriction that the local government will record with the property deeds. Any variation from the model deed restriction language can only be made with prior approval from FEMA's Office of Chief Counsel;
( 4 ) The documentation of voluntary interest signed by each property owner, which must include that the subapplicant has informed them in writing that it will not use its eminent domain authority for the open space purpose; and
( 5 ) Assurance that the subject property is not part of an intended, planned, or designated project area for which the land is to be acquired by a certain date, and that local and State governments have no intention to use the property for any public or private facility in the future inconsistent with this part;
( 6 ) If the subapplicant is offering pre-event value: the property owner's certification that the property owner is a National of the United States or qualified alien; and
( 7 ) Other information as determined by the Administrator.
( b ) *Consultation regarding other ongoing Federal activities.* ( 1 ) The subapplicant must demonstrate that it has consulted with the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) regarding the subject land's potential future use for the construction of a levee system. The subapplicant must also demonstrate that it has, and will, reject any future consideration of such use if it accepts FEMA assistance to convert the property to permanent open space.
( 2 ) The subapplicant must demonstrate that it has coordinated with its State Department of Transportation to ensure that no future, planned modifications, improvements, or enhancements to Federal aid systems are under consideration that will affect the subject property.
( c ) *Restriction on alternate properties.* Changes to the properties in an approved mitigation project will be considered by FEMA but not approved automatically. The subapplicant must identify the alternate properties in the project application and each alternate property must meet eligibility requirements in order to be considered.
[72 FR 61743, Oct. 31, 2007, as amended at 74 FR 47481, Sept. 16, 2009; 86 FR 50671, Sept. 10, 2021]
#### In the Matter of the Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Harry Segal et al., Copartners Trading as Ambassador Frame Company, to Abraham Meltzer, Respondent. Murray R. Paris, Appellant.

Ho opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.