alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2





Ener1,
      Inc.


500
      West
      Cypress Creek Road-Suite 100


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309






May
      15,
      2007





Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549





Re:
      Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350





Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1,
      Inc.,
      for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission, I, Ajit Habbu, Chief Financial Officer of Ener1, Inc., hereby
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1)
            such
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended
                March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and2)
            the
                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
                Ener1,
                Inc., for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                Ener1, Inc.





/s/
                Ajit HabbuAjit
                Habbu
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              (Duly
                Authorized Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized
                Officer)







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
      retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.





This
      certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to Ener1, Inc.’s
      quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
      to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
      reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
      except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
      filing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7479
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PRESTON WEST, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR97-175) Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 5, 2003 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Preston West, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Preston West appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of an order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. West , No. CR-97-175 (D. Md. July 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32

Securities
and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eastern American Natural Gas Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a
separate disclosure document.

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust
Company, N.A., Trustee, Trustee for Eastern American Natural Gas TrustBy:

/s/ MIKE ULRICH Vice PresidentThe Bank of New York Mellon Trust
Company, N.A.


Date:
August 7, 2009

---



QuickLinks
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-43 June 16, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING NEAR VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR PLANT

ON CHANGES IN REACTOR OVERSIGHT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for Thursday, June 22,

in Vernon, Vt., to discuss the agency’s new reactor oversight process. The process was initiated in

April at the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant and other commercial nuclear power plants

nationwide.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. at the Vernon Elementary School, on Governor Hunt Road.

Members of the public will have the opportunity to ask questions of NRC staff during and after the

meeting.

The new oversight process uses more objective, timely and safety-significant criteria in

assessing performance while seeking to more effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. Under

the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based personnel are

supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators. These

performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant operations, including the viability of

redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection and security measures.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s web site every three months. The safety significance of each inspection finding or performance

indicator is characterized by a color -- green, white, yellow or red.

The NRC response to the inspection finding and performance indicators will be based on the

significance of the items. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow or red

assessments receive increasing NRC involvement. Multiple red findings could result in a plant

shutdown.

A plain language summary of the reactor oversight process is available from the NRC Office

of Public Affairs or on the web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm

Detailed information regarding the reactor oversight process is available on the web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html
#
#### In the Matter of the Application of Emil Seerup for Admission to Practice as an Attorney. (From the State of Illinois.)

Present— Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
§ 145.11 Declarations of value and invoices. ( a ) *Customs declaration.* A clear and complete Customs declaration on the form provided by the foreign post office, giving a full and accurate description of the contents and value of the merchandise, shall be securely attached to at least one mail article of each shipment, including shipments of special classes of merchandise treated in subpart D of this part. Although a Customs declaration is required to be attached to only one mail article of each shipment, examination and release of the merchandise will be expedited if such a declaration is attached to each individual mail article.
( b ) *Invoice or statement of commercial value.* Each shipment of merchandise shall have an invoice or bill of sale (or, in the case of merchandise not purchased or consigned for sale, a statement of the fair retail value in the country of shipment), giving an accurate description and the purchase price of the merchandise, securely attached to the outside of the mail article or enclosed therein. If the shipment consists of more than one mail article, a copy of the invoice should accompany each mail article, or else the invoice shall accompany the mail article bearing the declaration, and that mail article shall be marked “Invoice enclosed.”
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) *Shipments without declaration and invoice.* Shipment of merchandise which are not accompanied by a Customs declaration and invoice in accordance with paragraphs (a) through (b) of this section may be subject to seizure and forfeiture in accordance with § 145.4.
[T.D. 73-135, 38 FR 13369, May 21, 1973, as amended by T.D. 76-103, 41 FR 14731, Apr. 7, 1976; T.D. 78-102, 43 FR 14454, Apr. 6, 1978; T.D. 85-39, 50 FR 9612, Mar. 11, 1985]
#### § 113.45 Charge for production of a missing document made against a continuous bond.

When a continuous bond secures the production of a missing document and the bond is breached by the principal's failure to timely produce that document, the claim for liquidated damages must be in an amount equal to the amount of the single transaction bond that would have been taken had the transaction been covered by a single transaction bond.

[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-15, 80 FR 70167, Nov. 13, 2015]
### Engineering geology applied to the design and operation of underground coal mines

By: C. Richard Dunrud

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b2147

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-002 January 12, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO BEGIN INSPECTION AT IP2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will begin a previously-scheduled inspection

Tuesday (January 16) at the Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant. The plant, in Buchanan, NY, is

operated by Consolidated Edison Company of New York.

Consolidated Edison Company was notified of the agency’s intent to conduct this inspection in

an October 11 letter (available at www.nrc.gov/OPA/gmo/nrarcv/00-071i.html). In that letter, NRC

Region I Administrator Hubert J. Miller said " several cornerstones in the NRC regulatory framework

are degraded at the IP2 facility."

The NRC’s revised inspection program includes three parts: baseline inspections conducted at

each of the nation’s 103 operating nuclear plants, special inspections, and supplemental inspections

performed as a result of performance issues. The intent of this supplemental inspection is to provide

the agency with supplemental information regarding licensee performance to determine the breadth

and depth of safety, organizational and programmatic issues. The results of this inspection will aid the

NRC in deciding whether additional regulatory actions are necessary to assure public health and safety.

The 13-member team will spend three weeks at Indian Point 2 collecting information. A

meeting to discuss the findings with the public will be scheduled several weeks after the conclusion of

the on-site portion of the inspection.

#
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.624 Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in a Party. ( a ) *General.* This section sets forth the rules which apply for purposes of obtaining duty-free treatment on goods returned after repair or alteration in a Party as provided for in subheadings 9802.00.40 and 9802.00.50, HTSUS. Goods returned after having been repaired or altered in a Party, whether or not pursuant to a warranty, are eligible for duty-free treatment, provided that the requirements of this section are met. For purposes of this section, “repairs or alterations” means restoration, addition, renovation, re-dyeing, cleaning, re-sterilizing, or other treatment that does not destroy the essential characteristics of, or create a new or commercially different good from, the good exported from the United States.
( b ) *Goods not eligible for duty-free treatment after repair or alteration.* The duty-free treatment referred to in paragraph (a) of this section will not apply to goods which, in their condition as exported from the United States to a Party, are incomplete for their intended use and for which the processing operation performed in the Party constitutes an operation that is performed as a matter of course in the preparation or manufacture of finished goods.
( c ) *Documentation.* The provisions of paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of § 10.8 of this part, relating to the documentary requirements for goods entered under subheading 9802.00.40 or 9802.00.50, HTSUS, will apply in connection with the entry of goods which are returned from a Party after having been exported for repairs or alterations and which are claimed to be duty free.
### §142i. United States Capitol Preservation Commission; provision of financial management services and support by Library of Congress

Effective June 15, 1989, the Library of Congress shall provide financial management services and support to the United States Capitol Preservation Commission as may be required and mutually agreed to by the Librarian of Congress and the Cochairmen of the United States Capitol Preservation Commission.

(Pub. L. 101–45, title I, June 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 107.)
§ 72.6 Unfavorable response. ( a ) Requests for CLOMAs, CLOMRs, or CLOMR-Fs may be denied or the determinations may contain specific comments, concerns, or conditions regarding proposed projects or designs and their impacts on flood hazards in a community. Requesters are not entitled to any refund of fees paid if the determinations contain such comments, concerns, or conditions, or if the requests are denied. Requesters are not entitled to any refund of fees paid if the requesters are unable to provide the appropriate scientific or technical documentation or to obtain required authorizations, permits, financing, etc., for which requesters seek the CLOMAs, CLOMRs, or CLOMR-Fs.
( b ) Requests for LOMRs, LOMR-Fs, or PMRs may be denied or the revisions to the FIRM, FBFM, or both, may not be in the manner or to the extent desired by the requesters. Requesters are not entitled to any refund of fees paid if the revision requests are denied or if the LOMRs, LOMR-Fs, or PMRs do not revise the map specifically as requested.
[62 FR 5738, Feb. 6, 1997]
S. 7 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two 

An Act 

To make a technical amendment to the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, 

and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VAWA Technical Amendment 

Act of 2022’’. 

SEC. 2. GRANTS TO COMBAT VIOLENT CRIMES. 

(a) AMENDMENT.—Section 2001(d) of title I of the Omnibus 

Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10441(d)) 

is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘or Native 

Hawaiian’’ after ‘‘Indian’’; 

(B) in subparagarph (B), by inserting ‘‘or Native 

Hawaiian’’ after ‘‘Indian’’; 

(C) in subparagraph (C)— 

(i) by inserting ‘‘or Native Hawaiian communities’’ 

after ‘‘tribal communities’’; and 

(ii) by inserting ‘‘or Native Hawaiian’’ after 

‘‘Indian’’; and 

(D) in subparagraph (D)— 

(i) by inserting ‘‘or Native Hawaiian communities’’ 

after ‘‘Indian tribes’’; and 

(ii) by inserting ‘‘or Native Hawaiian’’ after 

‘‘against Indian’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) in subparagraph (A)(iii), by inserting ‘‘or Native 

Hawaiian communities’’ after ‘‘Indian tribes’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘or Native 

Hawaiian communities’’ after ‘‘Indian tribes’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(6) NATIVE HAWAIIAN DEFINED.—In this subsection, the 

term ‘Native Hawaiian’ has the meaning given that term in 

section 801 of the Native American Housing Assistance and 

Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4221).’’. 

(b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

40002(a)(42) of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (34 U.S.C. 

12291(a)(42)) is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (A)— 
S. 7—2 

(A) by inserting ‘‘, Native Hawaiian organizations, or 

the Native Hawaiian community’’ after ‘‘Indian service providers’’; 

(B) by inserting ‘‘, organizations, or communities’’ after 

‘‘member providers’’; and 

(C) by inserting ‘‘or Native Hawaiian’’ after ‘‘designed 

to assist Indian’’; and 

(2) in subparagraph (B)— 

(A) in clause (i), by inserting ‘‘, organizations, or 

communities’’ after ‘‘member service providers’’; and 

(B) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘or Native Hawaiian 

communities’’ after ‘‘tribal communities’’. 

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

This Act shall become effective one day after enactment. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case No. 1:20-cv-23235-RNS

LEZER CORP.

a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

NOBLE PARTNERS LLC,

a Maine limited liability company, d/b/a

NOBLE MEDICAL SUPPLY;

SEAN GRADY, an individual,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CLERK’S DEFAULT AGAINST

DEFENDANT, NOBLE PARTNERS LLC d/b/a NOBLE MEDICAL SUPPLY

Plaintiff, LEZER CORP., a Delaware corporation (“Plaintiff” or “Lezer”), by and 

through its undersigned attorneys, hereby files this Motion for Entry of Clerk’s Default 

against Defendant, NOBLE PARTNERS LLC d/b/a NOBLE MEDICAL SUPPLY

(“Defendant” or “Noble”), and in support thereof states as follows:

1. Plaintiff filed the instant action on August 4, 2020 [D.E. 1], as amended on 

August 13, 2020 [D.E. 8].

2. On September 19, 2020, Plaintiff obtained service of process on Defendant 

[D.E. 14].

Case 1:20-cv-23235-RNS Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2020 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

3. To date, Defendant has not filed an answer or any type of responsive pleading

or otherwise with the Court despite being required to do so pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 12. The 

time has passed for Defendant to comply.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests the Clerk of Court enter a Clerk’s 

Default against Defendant, NOBLE PARTNERS LLC d/b/a NOBLE MEDICAL SUPPLY, 

for its failure to timely file an answer or responsive pleading in this action.

Dated: October 14, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

READ LAW PLLC

Co-Counsel to Plaintiff

25 SE 2nd Avenue, Eighth Floor

Miami, Florida 33131

Phone: (305) 209-2131

asr@alexisreadlaw.com

By: /s/ Alexis S. Read

Alexis S. Read, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 98084

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 14, 2020, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing was served via e-mail to those parties required to receive e-mail service pursuant to 

Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.516, and/or by U.S. Mail to all parties on the CM/ECF Service List:

Sean Grady

12 Wellstone Drive

Portland, ME 04013

Noble Partners LLC 

d/b/a Noble Medical Supply

Attn: Sean Grady, President

12 Wellstone Drive

Portland, ME 04013

By: /s/ Alexis S. Read

Alexis S. Read, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 98084

Case 1:20-cv-23235-RNS Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §5539. Commissions and charges for public telephone or telecommunications services; deposit of receipts

#### (a) Authority of Chief Administrative Officer to receive commissions for providing public telephone service in House occupied areas

Effective October 1, 1988, the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives is authorized to receive commissions for providing public telephone service in space occupied by the United States House of Representatives.

#### (b) Deposit of receipts; availability for expenditure

Receipts from the commissions and charges set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be deposited in the United States Treasury for credit to the appropriation for "Salaries and Expenses of the United States House of Representatives", and shall be available for expenditure upon the approval of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

(Pub. L. 100–458, title III, §306, Oct. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2182; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(64), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1739; Pub. L. 108–447, div. G, title I, §102(d), Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3174.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 117f of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1989.

#### Amendments

2004—Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 108–447 redesignated subsec. (c) as (b), substituted "subsection (a)" for "subsections (a) and (b)", and struck out heading and text of former subsec. (b). Text read as follows: "The Chief Administrative Officer is authorized to receive for deposit, amounts charged to any legislative branch entity, including the Congressional Budget Office and the Architect of the Capitol, for the provision of telephone or telecommunications services, except that no amount charged to the Members' Representational Allowance shall be deposited in accordance with this section."

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–186, §204(64)(A), substituted "Chief Administrative Officer" for "Clerk".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–186, §204(64)(B), substituted "Chief Administrative Officer" for "Clerk", struck out "but not limited to Legislative Service Organizations," after "entity, including", and substituted ", except that no amount charged to the Members' Representational Allowance" for ": Provided, That no amounts charged to the official expense allowances of Members of the House".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2004 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 108–447 applicable with respect to fiscal year 2005 and each succeeding fiscal year, see section 5538(f) of this title.
### §678. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this chapter for each fiscal year such sums as the Congress shall deem necessary.

(Pub. L. 91–596, §33, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1620.)