alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.49 Articles for exhibition; requirements on entry. ( a ) There shall be filed in connection with the entry of works of art and other articles claimed to be free of duty under Chapter 98, Subchapter XII, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), a declaration, or its electronic equivalent, by a qualified officer of the institution in sufficient detail to demonstrate entitlement to entry as claimed, and a bond on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter. Claim for free entry under Chapter 98, Subchapter XII may be made for articles of the character described therein which have been previously entered under any other provision of law and the entry amended accordingly upon compliance with the requirements of this section, provided the articles have not been released from Customs custody.
( b ) The Center director may require a copy of the charter or other evidence of the character of the institution for which the articles are imported, and may also require the production of the original of any order given by such society or institution to any importing agent or dealer for such articles. The society or institution shall file, within 6 months after the date of filing the entry, any document or proof demanded by the Center director in connection with the entry.
( c ) Articles entered under subheading 9812.00.20, HTSUS, may be transferred from one institution to another upon an application in writing in the case of each transfer describing the articles and stating the name of the institution to which transfer is to be made, provided the sureties to the bond assent in writing under seal or a new bond is filed. No entry or withdrawal shall be required for such a transfer.
( d ) If any of the articles accorded free entry under Chapter 98, Subchapter XII shall be sold, offered or exposed for sale, transferred, or used in any manner contrary to the provisions of the regulations in this part, within 5 years after the date of entry under such part, the amount of the duties shall be collected immediately by the CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically and deposited as duties. If the articles are exported or destroyed under Customs supervision within such 5-year period, the liability under the bond shall be treated as terminated.
[28 FR 14663, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41166, Oct. 19, 1984; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51249, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 92-85, 57 FR 40605, Sept. 4, 1992; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61284, Oct. 13, 2015]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****Annual report fy...**
 
2003 | 2005
 
SuDoc:ID 1.27:C 44/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000636537
 
October 31, 2017
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-179 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, October 6, 1998)

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING ON REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting

Friday, November 13 in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss proposed

regulations that would modify nuclear power plant reporting

requirements.

The meeting will be in the auditorium of NRC’s headquarters at Two

White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:15 p.m.

Following introductory remarks and a discussion by the NRC staff of

contemplated changes to the regulations, the meeting will be open for

public comments, beginning about 10:00 a.m.

Current NRC regulations specify the types of events and issues

that power reactor licensees must report to NRC and the time limits for

reporting. The objectives of the rulemaking now under way are to better

align the reporting requirements with NRC needs; reduce licensees’

reporting burden, where consistent with NRC needs; and clarify the

requirements. For example, the time limit for reporting could be

adjusted, based on the safety significance of the event or issue and the

need for immediate NRC action. NRC published an advance notice of

proposed rulemaking on this subject in the July 23 edition of the

Federal Register and held a public meeting on this issue August 21 in

Rockville.

Persons who wish to speak at the meeting should contact Dennis P.

Allison, NRC Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data,

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, telephone: 301/415-6835, e-mail:

dpa@nrc.gov ; or Bennett M. Brady at the same address, telephone:

301/415-6363, e-mail: bb1@nrc.gov. Registration will be available at

the meeting for a limited number of additional speakers.

###
### **CHAPTER 14—AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT**

Sec.
621.
Congressional statement of findings and purpose.
622.
Education and research program; recommendation to Congress.
623.
Prohibition of age discrimination.
624.
Study by Secretary of Labor; reports to President and Congress; scope of study; implementation of study; transmittal date of reports.
625.
Administration.
626.
Recordkeeping, investigation, and enforcement.
627.
Notices to be posted.
628.
Rules and regulations; exemptions.
629.
Criminal penalties.
630.
Definitions.
631.
Age limits.
632.
Omitted.
633.
Federal-State relationship.
633a.
Nondiscrimination on account of age in Federal Government employment.
634.
Authorization of appropriations.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-128 September 25, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC, GPU NUCLEAR TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT OYSTER CREEK

Officials from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and GPU

Nuclear Inc. will meet on Tuesday, September 30, to discuss five

apparent violations of agency requirements at the Oyster Creek

nuclear power plant. Oyster Creek is located in Lacey Township,

N.J.

Among the apparent infractions are three design control

issues, the control of material in emergency service water pumps

and inadequate corrective actions regarding personnel errors.

The NRC identified the problems during an inspection at the plant

that was completed on August 24.

The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. in the public meeting

room at the NRC Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa. It will

be open to the public for observation.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement

conference does not mean that the NRC has determined a violation

has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather,

the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity

to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its

proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at

this conference. That decision will be made by NRC officials at

a later time.

#
-90 -85 -80 -75 -70

35 40 45



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 07/03 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 03 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Doug Longhini, Plaintiff,

v.

17070 Collins Avenue Shopping 

Center, Ltd. and others, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-61359-Civ-Scola

Order Approving And Entering Consent Decree

And Dismissing Action With Prejudice

This matter is before the Court upon the parties’ Joint Motion for Approval 

and Entry of Consent Decree and to Dismiss Action with Prejudice. The Court, 

having reviewed the Joint Motion and the Consent Decree attached to the Joint 

Motion as Exhibit “A,” and being advised fully in the premises, hereby orders as 

follows:

1. The Court finds the Consent Decree to be fundamentally fair, 

adequate and reasonable to improve and provide access for persons with 

disabilities at the property at issue, and to otherwise meet the purposes of Title 

III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181, et seq.

2. The Joint Motion for Approval and Entry of Consent Decree and to 

Dismiss Action with Prejudice is granted. (ECF No. 95.)

3. The Court approves and adopts the Consent Decree, and pursuant 

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54, the Consent Decree is hereby entered and this action is 

dismissed with prejudice.

4. The Court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the Consent Decree and 

to monitor and enforce compliance with the terms of the Consent Decree to the 

extent necessary.

5. Each party shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs except as 

detailed in the Consent Decree. 

6. The Court directs the Clerk to close this case. All pending motions, 

if any, are denied as moot.

Case 0:20-cv-61359-RNS Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

Done and ordered in Miami, Florida, on March 29, 2021.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 0:20-cv-61359-RNS Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2021 Page 2 of 2
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

No. III-00-41 July 17, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING JULY 19 IN REGIONAL OFFICE

TO DISCUSS QUAD CITIES EQUIPMENT FAILURE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Commonwealth Edison Co. officials

on July 19 to discuss a failure in one of the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Plant’s backup cooling systems

that occurred during testing earlier this year. The plant is located in Cordova, Illinois.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will begin at 1:30 p.m. CDT in the NRC’s Region III

office, 801 Warrenville Road, in Lisle, Illinois. The meeting will cover the significance of the

equipment failure and the utility’s response to the problem.

During testing on January 19, a valve in the plant’s safe shutdown make-up system failed to

operate properly. The system’s function is to provide cooling water to the reactor in the event the

plant’s other emergency reactor cooling systems are disabled by fire or other problems.

# #
Joe Martens

Commissioner 

### New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Division of Environmental Remediation

Office of the Director

, 12th Floor

625 Broadway, Albany, New York 12233

- 7011

Phone: ( 518 ) 402

- 9706 • Fax: ( 518 ) 402

- 9020

Website: www.dec.ny.gov

Mr. Walter Mugdan

Director

Emergency & Remedial Response Division

United States Environmental Protection Agency

290 Broadway, 19 th Fl., E38

New York, New York 10007

- 1866

RE: Proposed Deletion from the National Priorit y Listing

Pasley Solvents and Chemicals, Inc. Site

, G a rden City (V), Nassau

County

, Site No. 1 30016

Dear Mr. Mugd a n:

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (Department) has

received the recommendation by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)

, d ated July 29, 2011 , to remove the Pasley Solvents and Chemicals, Inc. Superfund s ite from the

National Priority List

. During this deletion process, in accordance with Section 300.425(e) of the

National Contingency Plan, the USEPA must “consult with the state on proposed deletions from

the NPL.”

T he USEPA Final Close out Report documents that the remedial ac tions selected for the

site, which were documented in the Record of Decision (ROD) and ROD Amendment, were

implemented by the USEPA, t he Department, and other potentially responsible parties at the site

in accordance with the se decision documents.

With t his understanding, we concur with the proposed deletion of the Pasley Solvents and

Chemicals, Inc. Superfund site from the National Priority List

.

Sincerely,

Dale A. Desnoyers

Director

Division of Environmental Remediation

e c : D. Garbarini, USEPA ( garbarini.doug@epa.gov )

S. Henry , USEPA ( henry.sherrel@epa.gov )

P. Mannino

, USEPA ( mannino.pietro@epa.gov )

R. Schick

J

. Harrington

K. Maloney
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

101 Marietta St., Suite 2900, Atlanta, GA 30323

Tel. 404-331-5503 or 7878

No. II-96-55 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Friday, June 14, 1996)

Roger Hannah 404-331-7878

NRC OFFICIAL TO HOLD NEWS CONFERENCE IN MIAMI ON JUNE 18

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission official will hold a special news conference in Miami on

Tuesday, June 18, to discuss the agency's regulatory responsibilities at commercial nuclear power

plants in Florida and the United States.

Luis A. Reyes, Deputy Administrator of the NRC's Region II office in Atlanta, will brief

reporters at 10:00 a.m. (EDT) in Room 220 of the Claude Pepper Federal Building, 51 S.W.

First Avenue, Miami, on current regulatory issues at the Turkey Point plant near Homestead,

the St. Lucie plant near Ft. Pierce, and the Crystal River plant at Crystal River, about 50 miles

west of Ocala.

Reyes will also discuss the status of the University of Florida research reactor at Gainesville,

transportation and storage of spent fuel, NRC's regulatory agreement with the State of Florida,

and NRC preparations for emergency response in the event of accidents or hurricanes.

NRC regional officials hold these news conferences on a quarterly basis to discuss events at

regulated nuclear facilities and answer reporters’ questions on these subjects.

Mr. Reyes speaks fluent Spanish and will be available to discuss matters of interest to Spanish

language reporters who attend.

####
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.712 Verification of claim for preferential tariff treatment.

A claim for preferential tariff treatment made under § 10.703 of this subpart, including any statements or other information submitted to CBP in support of the claim, will be subject to such verification as the Center director deems necessary. In the event that the Center director for any reason is prevented from verifying the claim, or is provided with insufficient information to verify or substantiate the claim, the Center director may deny the claim for preferential tariff treatment.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7778

PHILIP HARRY MARSHNER, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus JON P. GALLEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00254-RDB) Submitted: April 4, 2007 Decided: April 17, 2007 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Philip Harry Marshner, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Philip Harry Marshner, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as untimely. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Marshner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
§ 315.10 Appeals, final determinations, and termination of certification. ( a ) Any petitioner may appeal in writing to EDA from a denial of certification, provided that EDA receives the appeal by personal delivery or by registered mail within 60 calendar days from the date of notice of denial under § 315.7(g). The appeal must state the grounds on which the appeal is based, including a concise statement of the supporting facts and applicable law. The decision of EDA on the appeal shall be the final determination within the Department. In the absence of an appeal by the petitioner under this paragraph (a), the determination under § 315.7(g) shall be final.
( b ) A Firm, its representative, or any other interested domestic party aggrieved by a final determination under paragraph (a) of this section may, within 60 calendar days after notice of such determination, begin a civil action in the United States Court of International Trade for review of such determination, in accordance with section 284 of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C. 2395).
( c ) Whenever EDA determines that a Certified Firm no longer requires Adjustment Assistance or for other good cause, EDA will terminate the certification and promptly publish notice of such termination in the Federal Register. The termination will take effect on the date specified in the published notice. EDA shall immediately notify the petitioner and shall state the reasons for any termination.
**EXHIBIT
      32**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of Megola Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
      for the year ending July 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel Gardner, Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
      statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company. and
      will be retained by the Company. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.







Joel
      Gardner





Chief
      Executive Officer


Chief
      Financial Officer




March
      10,
      2007


-33-
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.721 Scope.

This subpart implements the duty preference and related customs provisions applicable to imported goods under the United States-Australia Free Trade Agreement (the AFTA) signed on May 18, 2004, and under the United States-Australia Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (“the Act”), Pub. L. 108-286, 118 Stat. 919 (19 U.S.C. 3805 note). Except as otherwise specified in this subpart, the procedures and other requirements set forth in this subpart are in addition to the customs procedures and requirements of general application contained elsewhere in this chapter. Additional provisions implementing certain aspects of the AFTA and the Act are contained in parts 24, 162, and 163 of this chapter.
**Exhibit
32.2**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Equipment Growth & Income Fund
VII (the “Partnership”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
and of the Partnership, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the
Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
 
 
 
 /s/
Richard K Brock
 Richard K
Brock
 Chief
Financial Officer of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 (Principal
Financial Officer)
 November
11, 2005