alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING

56 Forsyth Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

David J. Smith

Clerk of Court 

June 28, 2024

For rules and forms visit

www.ca11.uscourts.gov

Clerk - Southern District of Florida 

U.S. District Court 

400 N MIAMI AVE

MIAMI, FL 33128-1810 

Appeal Number: 24-10054-AA 

Case Style: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Capital Source 2000, Inc. 

District Court Docket No: 9:20-cv-81205-RAR

The enclosed copy of the Clerk's Order of Dismissal pursuant to appellant's motion to dismiss is 

issued as the mandate of this court. See 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a). 

Any pending motions are now rendered moot in light of the attached order. 

Clerk's Office Phone Numbers 

General Information: 404-335-6100 Attorney Admissions: 404-335-6122 

Case Administration: 404-335-6135 Capital Cases: 404-335-6200 

CM/ECF Help Desk: 404-335-6125 Cases Set for Oral Argument: 404-335-6141 

Enclosure(s) 

DIS-3 Letter and Entry of Dismissal Vol

 

USCA11 Case: 24-10054 Document: 28 Date Filed: 06/28/2024 Page: 1 of 2 

JG Jun 28, 2024 MIAMI

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1980 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/28/2024 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

______________

No. 24-10054-AA

______________ 

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC., 

d.b.a. Par Funding, et al., 

 Defendants,

CAPITAL SOURCE 2000, INC., 

 Interested Party - Appellant,

__________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

__________________________________________

ORDER: Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant Capital Source 2000, Inc. is 

GRANTED by clerk. Pursuant to FRAP 42 and 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a), the above referenced 

appeal was duly entered dismissed on this date. 

Effective June 28, 2024. 

DAVID J. SMITH

Clerk of Court of the United States Court

of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

FOR THE COURT - BY DIRECTION 

USCA11 Case: 24-10054 Document: 28 Date Filed: 06/28/2024 Page: 2 of 2

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1980 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/28/2024 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on [Part 141](/current/title-19/part-141?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, [81 FR 93019](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/81-FR-93019), Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 141.32 Form for power of attorney.

Customs Form 5291 may be used for giving power of attorney to transact Customs business. If a Customs power of attorney is not on a Customs Form 5291, it shall be either a general power of attorney with unlimited authority or a limited power of attorney as explicit in its terms and executed in the same manner as a Customs Form 5291. The following is an example of an acceptable general power of attorney with unlimited authority:

### KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(Name of principal)

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ ,

(State legal designation, such as corporation, individual, etc.) residing at \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ and doing business under the laws of the State of \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_, hereby appoints

(Name, legal designation, and address)

as a true and lawful agent and attorney of the principal named above with full power and authority to do and perform every lawful act and thing the said agent and attorney may deem requisite and necessary to be done for and on behalf of the said principal without limitation of any kind as fully as said principal could do if present and acting, and hereby ratify and confirm all that said agent and attorney shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of these presents until and including \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_, (date) or until notice of revocation in writing is duly given before that date.

Date \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_, 19\_\_\_\_;.

(Principal's signature)
### §285. Establishment

There is established in the House of Representatives an office to be known as the Office of the Law Revision Counsel, referred to hereinafter in this chapter as the "Office".

(Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, §101, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on section 205(a) of House Resolution No. 988, Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 8, 1974, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–554.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777, provided that the enactment of House Resolution No. 988, Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 8, 1974, into permanent law is effective on Jan. 2, 1975. This chapter is derived from enactment into permanent law of section 205 of House Resolution No. 988.
#### § 12.118 Toxic Substances Control Act.

The Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”) (15 U.S.C. 2601 *et seq.*) governs the importation into the customs territory of the United States of a chemical substance in bulk form or as part of a mixture, and articles containing a chemical substance or mixture. Such importations are also governed by these regulations which are issued under the authority of section 13(b) of TSCA (15 U.S.C. 2612(b)).

[CBP Dec. 16-28, 81 FR 94985, Dec. 27, 2016]
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 20-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 1 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 20-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 2 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 20-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 3 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 20-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 4 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 20-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 5 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 20-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 6 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 20-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 7 of 7
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-111 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

TRUST TITLE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________ 

2015-5004

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:11-cv-00745-CFL, Judge Charles F. 

Lettow. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DONALD C. HOLMES, JR., Donald C. Holmes and Associates, P.A., Greensboro, MD, argued for plaintiffappellant. 

ERIC LAUFGRABEN, Commercial Litigation Branch, 

Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also 

represented by JOYCE R. BRANDA, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN,

JR., BRYANT G. SNEE; TODD P. MAIBERGER, United States 
 

Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and 

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
#### § 4130.6-4 Special grazing permits or leases.

Special grazing permits or leases authorizing grazing use by privately owned or controlled indigenous animals may be issued at the discretion of the authorized officer. This use shall be consistent with multiple-use objectives. These permits or leases shall be issued for a term deemed appropriate by the authorized officer not to exceed 10 years.

[43 FR 29067, July 5, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 41711, Sept. 21, 1982. Redesignated at 60 FR 9965, Feb. 22, 1995]
From: Carlson, Sara [Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com]

Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 12:07 PM

To: Land, Eva

Subject: FW: Tenkay 6D

Hey Eva,

Here is the information I got from Camfil. Hopefully I should have an answer about the ASPA dust

collectors later today.

Thanks,

Sara

From: Mabrey, Jim [ mailto:Jim.Mabrey@camfil.com ]

Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 10:50 AM

To: Carlson, Sara

Subject: RE: Tenkay 6D



### See below:

Jim Mabrey / Technical Support

Appli cations Manager, Camfil APC

3505 South Airport Road

Jonesboro, AR 72401

Phone: 870

- 910

- 7131

Mobile: 870

- 219

- 7516

Email: mabreyj@farrapc.com

Fax: 870

- 933

- 8381

Web address: www.camfilapc.com

Follow: Twitter

Connect: Facebook

Watch: YouTube

Learn: Blog

Please consider the environment before printing this e

- mailFrom: Carlson, Sara [mailto:Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com]

Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 10:19 AM

To: Mabrey, Jim

Subject: Tenkay 6D

I just spoke with you on the phone about the Tenkay 6D dust collector and here were the two questions:

1 )The necessary constant minimum air supply pressure reading : 90

– 105 psi (Volume based upon 0.9

SCFM per pulse.)

2) The designated maximum pressure drop when the system pulses : none specified.

Thank you for your help!

Sara Carlson

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

EHS Representative II, Gulf of Mexico

Sara.Carlson@an adarko.com

832

- 636

- 1273 (office)

832

- 506

- 0888 (cell)

Click here for Anadarko’s Electronic Mail Disclaimer
Exhibit 32.1



LASER MORTGAGE MANAGEMENT, INC.



Section 1350 Certification



In connection with the periodic report of LASER Mortgage Management, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William J. Michaelcheck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                     |  |                                               
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Date: March 29, 2004 |  | /s/ William J. Michaelcheck                   
|                     |  | William J. Michaelcheck                       
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director
Order entered June 2, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01148-CV

GREENWOOD MOTOR LINES, INC. D/B/A R+L CARRIERS, ET AL., Appellants

V.

BOBBIE BUSH, Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-16041-M

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ May 29, 2015 unopposed motion for leave to file a consolidated 

reply brief exceeding the word limit. Appellants’ consolidated reply brief was timely filed on 

June 1, 2015.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
452 P.2d 468

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Otto THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 8674.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

March 31, 1969.

Harold N. Olive, Carlsbad, for appellant.

Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., James V. Noble, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellee.

OPINION

TACKETT, Justice.

Otto Thompson, appellant, was tried before a jury on March 20, 1952, along with Terrell David Watson, and found guilty of first degree murder. They were sentenced to life imprisonment in the New Mexico State Penitentiary. On January 8, 1968, Thompson filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court of Eddy County, alleging that his constitutional rights had been violated. That petition was denied on January 11, 1968, on the ground that the claims of petitioner were not sustained, but were contrary to the record in the case. The trial judge’s order in the habeas corpus case carefully and in detail disposed of appellant’s claims.

On January 26, 1968, Thompson filed a motion to vacate judgment and sentence, pursuant to Rule 93 (§ 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp., 1967 Pocket Supp.), alleging substantially the same grounds as contained in the habeas corpus petition.

On February 9, 1968, the trial court entered an order denying the motion, making the following pertinent findings of fact:

> “On January 8, 1968, Thompson filed in this Court an application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. On January 11, 1968, an Order was entered denying the application. The Order entered is on file herein.

> “On January 26, 1968, Thompson filed herein a Motion to Vacate the Judgment and sentence. The Motion is based upon substantially the same grounds set forth in the application for a Writ.”

The trial court concluded that it was not required by law to entertain successive motions under such circumstances. Rule 93, supra.

Since the findings of fact are not specifically attacked, they are conclusive on appeal. Supreme Court Rule 15(6) (§ 21-2-1(15) (6), N.M.S.A, 1953 Comp.); State v. Simien, 78 N.M. 709, 437 P.2d 708 (1968); Morris v. Merchant, 77 N.M. 411, 423 P.2d 606 (1967); Hindi v. Smith, 73 *135N.M. 335, 388 P.2d 60 (1963); Hutchison v. Boney, 72 N.M. 194, 382 P.2d 525 (1963); Hinkle v. Schmider, 70 N.M. 349, 373 P.2d 918 (1962); Swallows v. Sierra, 68 N.M. 338, 362 P.2d 391 (1961); Latta v. Harvey, 67 N.M. 72, 352 P.2d 649 (1960); and cases cited therein. We agree that the trial court is not required by law to entertain successive motions. Therefore, the decision of the trial court is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

NOBLE, C. J., and CARMODY, J., concur.
# Euroopan unionin C 254A/14.

| | ISSN 1725-2490 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 254A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 48. vuosikerta14. lokakuuta 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2490

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 254A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

48. vuosikerta14. lokakuuta 2005

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Tiedotteita |
| | Neuvosto |
| 2005/C 254A/1 | Ilmoitus avoinna olevasta toimesta: Tilannepäivystäjien/viestittäjien päällikkö – Tilannepäivystäjä/viestittäjä — Viitenumero: Neuvosto/B/023 ja Neuvosto/B/024 | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

III   Tiedotteita

Neuvosto

2005/C 254A/1

Ilmoitus avoinna olevasta toimesta: Tilannepäivystäjien/viestittäjien päällikkö – Tilannepäivystäjä/viestittäjä — Viitenumero: Neuvosto/B/023 ja Neuvosto/B/024

1

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

III Tiedotteita

Neuvosto

| 14.10.2005 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 254/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2005

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 254/1

---

ILMOITUS AVOINNA OLEVASTA TOIMESTA

TILANNEPÄIVYSTÄJIEN — VIESTITTÄJIEN PÄÄLLIKKÖ

TILANNEPÄIVYSTÄJÄ — VIESTITTÄJÄ

Viitenumero: Neuvosto/B/023 ja Neuvosto/B/024

(2005/C 254 A/01)

Euroopan unionin neuvoston pääsihteeristössä on täytettävänä väliaikaisesti

| — | yksi B*-ura-alueen virka, palkkaluokka 7 (AST7) — Neuvosto/B/023 |
| --- | --- |

—

yksi B*-ura-alueen virka, palkkaluokka 7 (AST7) — Neuvosto/B/023

| — | kahdeksan B*-ura-alueen virkaa, palkkaluokka 5 (AST5) — Neuvosto/B/024 |
| --- | --- |

—

kahdeksan B*-ura-alueen virkaa, palkkaluokka 5 (AST5) — Neuvosto/B/024

Euroopan unionin tilannekeskuksessa (SITCEN) Brysselissä. SITCEN seuraa ja arvioi kansainvälisiä tapahtumia kokovuorokautisesti painopistealueenaan riskialueet, terrorismi sekä joukkotuhoaseiden leviäminen ja toimii EU:n korkeana edustajana toimivan pääsihteerin, erityisedustajien ja EU:n muiden korkeiden virkamiesten tukena sekä avustaa EU:n sotilaallisissa operaatioissa tai siviilikriisinhallintaoperaatioissa.

Lisätietoja saa valinta- ja palvelukseenottoyksiköstä joko sähköpostitse osoitteesta:

service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int

tai yksikön verkkosivun kautta osoitteesta:

http://ue.eu.int/concours

Hakuaika päättyy 10.11.2005 (kyseisen päivän postileima riittää).

---
### §4122. Deposit of fees for services by Office of Attending Physician; availability of amounts deposited

(a) There is established a subaccount in the appropriation account for salaries and expenses of the House of Representatives for the deposit of fees received from Members and officers of the House of Representatives for services provided to such Members and officers by the Office of the Attending Physician. The amounts so deposited shall be available, subject to appropriation, for the operations of the Office of the Attending Physician.

(b) This section shall take effect at the beginning of the first month after October 1992.

(Pub. L. 102–392, title I, §104, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1710.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 117h of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriations Act, 1993, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1993.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-81248-Civ-MIDDLEBROOKS/Brannon

NELSON FERNANDEZ, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES

STORES, INC., a foreign for-profit

corporation,

Defendant.

________________________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ, by and through his undersigned Counsel, hereby 

provides notice that the parties have reached a settlement and will be executing necessary 

paperwork resolving all claims and matters in the case. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request 

that the Court stay all further proceedings to allow the parties to finalize the settlement agreement

and file a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice.

DATED: August 18, 2020.

Respectfully submitted, 

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO

Counsel for Plaintiff DURAN, P.A.

8751 W. Broward Blvd., Suite 303 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

Plantation, FL 33324 4640 N.W. 7th Street

T. 954/362-3800 Miami, FL 33126-2309

954/362-3779 (Facsimile) T. 305/266-9780 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com 305/269-8311 (Facsimile)

Email: pduran@pelayoduran.com

By____s/ Roderick V. Hannah __ By ___s/ Pelayo M. Duran ______

RODERICK V. HANNAH PELAYO M. DURAN

Fla. Bar No. 435384 Fla. Bar No. 0146595 

Case 9:20-cv-81248-DMM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2020 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
      32.1





Ener1,
      Inc.


500
      West
      Cypress Creek Road-Suite 100


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309





March
      24,
      2006





Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549





Re:
      Certification Of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350





Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
      connection with the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form
      10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Ronald Stewart, Chief Executive Officer
      of Ener1, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            such
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended
                March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and








2)
            the
                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
                Ener1,
                Inc., for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                Ener1, Inc.








/s/
                Ronald Stewart
              
              Ronald
                Stewart
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer and
              Duly
                Authorized Officer)











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
      retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.





This
      certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to Ener1, Inc. `s
      quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
      to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
      reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
      except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
      filing.
### §117h. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 117h was editorially reclassified as section 4122 of this title.
§ 102.13 De Minimis. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, foreign materials that do not undergo the applicable change in tariff classification set out in § 102.20 or satisfy the other applicable requirements of that section when incorporated into a good shall be disregarded in determining the country of origin of the good if the value of those materials is no more than 7 percent of the value of the good or 10 percent of the value of a good of Chapter 22, Harmonized System.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to a foreign material incorporated in a good provided for in Chapter 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15, 17, or 20 of the Harmonized System.
( c ) Foreign components or materials that do not undergo the applicable change in tariff classification set out in § 102.21 or satisfy the other applicable requirements of that section when incorporated into a textile or apparel product covered by that section shall be disregarded in determining the country of origin of the good if the total weight of those components or materials is not more than 7 percent of the total weight of the good.
[T.D. 96-48, 61 FR 28956, June 6, 1996]