alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCHow We Regulate

# Enforcement

The Office of Enforcement promotes the NRC's mission by leading in the development and oversight of policies and programs for enforcement, allegations, and safety culture and supporting their implementation.

See the following for more information on enforcement:
            - Issued Significant Enforcement Actions
            - Enforcement Authority and Regulations
            - Enforcement Policy
            - Enforcement Program Overview
            - Enforcement Process Diagram
            - Upcoming Conferences
            - Enforcement Guidance
            - Sanctions for Discrimination Against Employees Who Raise Safety Concerns
            - Alternative Dispute Resolution
            - Safety Culture
            - Public Involvement in the Enforcement Process
            - Contact Us About Enforcement

You can report or request NRC action on nuclear health and safety concerns in several ways:
            - Report a safety concern  related to nuclear activities regulated by the NRC.
            - Report fraud, waste, or abuse  by NRC employees or contractors.
            - Petition the NRC to take specific enforcement action  against a licensee or any other person subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission for potential health and safety concerns.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 07, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Rulemaking
          - Guidance Development
          - Generic Communications Program
          - Standards Development
          - Licensing
          - Certification
          - Inspection
          - Assessment of Performance for Operating Facilities
          - Enforcement
          - Investigations
          - Allegations
          - Events Assessment
          - Generic Issues
          - Research
          - Risk Assessment
          - Performance Assessment for Waste Disposal and Decommissioning
          - Advisory Activities
          - CRGR Reviews
          - Adjudications (Hearings)
          - NMSS Center of Expertise

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Key Topics

            - Safety Culture
            - Allegations

#### Related Information

            - Significant Enforcement Actions
            - Notices of Enforcement Discretion
            - Office of Enforcement Annual Reports
            - History of Enforcement Policy
            - Security Orders

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 07, 2020
#### SHE MEI LIN, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT,* Respondent.

No. 00-71132.

INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 **.

Decided May 24, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 Attorney General John Ashcroft is the proper respondent under the permanent rules of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.

**

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

She Mei Lin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of *641Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal of the immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the United Nations Convention Against Torture (the “Convention”). The permanent rules of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 apply, see *Castro-Espinosa v. Ashcroft,*257 F.3d 1130, 1131 n. 1 (9th Cir.2001) (order), and we deny the petition.

We review credibility findings of the BIA for substantial evidence and we uphold the adverse credibility finding unless the evidence compels a contrary result. *Chebchoub v. INS,*257 F.3d 1038, 1042, 1043 (9th Cir.2001). Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility finding because She Mei Lin presented contradictory evidence regarding his wife whom he claims was forcibly sterilized. For example, She Mei Lin produced a marriage certificate that lists his wife’s name as Ya Mei Wang and birth date as December 10, 1967. The sterilization certificate, however, is in the name of Xiao Qin Wang, whose birth date is May 10, 1964, and who lives at a different address from She Mei Lin.

Because She Mei Lin failed to adequately explain the discrepancies, and the identity of his wife goes to the “heart of [his] asylum claim,” the denial of asylum was appropriate. *See id.*at 1043 (alteration in original). It follows that She Mei Lin did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See de Leon-Barrios v. INS,*116 F.3d 391, 394 (9th Cir. 1997).

We decline to review the BIA’s denial of She Mei Lin’s application for relief under the Convention because he does not challenge that ruling on appeal. *See Miller v. Fairchild Indus., Inc.,*797 F.2d 727, 738 (9th Cir.1986).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 xhiS disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.784 Verification and justification of claim for preferential treatment. ( a ) *Verification.* A claim for preferential treatment made under § 10.763 of this subpart, including any declaration or other information submitted to CBP in support of the claim, will be subject to such verification as the Center director deems necessary. In the event that the Center director is provided with insufficient information to verify or substantiate the claim, the Center director may deny the claim for preferential treatment.
( b ) *Applicable accounting principles.* When conducting a verification of origin to which Generally Accepted Accounting Principles may be relevant, CBP will apply and accept the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles applicable in the country of production.
§ 12.104a Importations prohibited. ( a ) No article of cultural property documented as appertaining to the inventory of a museum or religious or secular public monument or similar institution in any State Party which was stolen from such museum, monument, or institution after April 12, 1983, or after the date of entry into force of the Convention for the State Party, whichever date is later, may be imported into the U.S.
( b ) No archaeological or ethnological material designated pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2604 and listed in § 12.104g, that is exported (whether or not such exportation is to the U.S.) from the State Party after the designation of such material under 19 U.S.C. 2604 may be imported into the U.S. unless the State Party issues a certificate or other documentation which certifies that such exportation was not in violation of the laws of the State Party.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON, D.C.

SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY

July 13, 2017

The President
The White House
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President:

I am pleased to provide you the annual reporting required by Executive Order 13019, Supporting
Families: Collecting Delinquent Child Support Obligations, dated September 28, 1996,
concerning the implementation by agencies of the Executive Order and the provisions of the
Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA) applicable to delinquent child support
obligations.

The Department of the Treasury (Treasury) has been intercepting Federal tax refund payments to
collect delinquent child support debts since 1982, The DCIA extended Treasury’s authority to
collect these debts by permitting the offset of certain Federal non-tax payments, such as
payments to Federal contractors.

Since the issuance of Executive Order 13019 in 1996, Treasury, through its Treasury Offset
Program (TOP) and in collaboration with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS),
has collected more than $35 billion in past-due child support obligations by offsetting eligible
Federal tax and nontax payments to delinquent child support obligors. In fiscal year 2016, TOP
facilitated the collection of $1.87 billion in child support debts for states, territories, and families.

Treasury remains strongly committed to its successful partnership with HHS and the states to
maximize the collection of delinquent child support obligations through the interception of
Federal payments. We will continue to support the important goal of carrying out the provisions
of the DCIA and Executive Order 13019.

Sincerely,

SFr To Mucho

Steven T. Mnuchin

cc: The Honorable Thomas E. Price, M.D.
#### CHESTER BOWLES, Administrator, Office of Price Administration, et al., Movants, v. MRS. JOE GRIFFITH, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 8, 1945.

Fritz Krueger, District Attorney, O. P. A. and Joseph S. Freeland for movants.

R. L. Myre opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; Judgment affirmed.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-96-58 September 20, 1996

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH ILLINOIS POWER OFFICIALS

TO DISCUSS SEPT. 5 SHUTDOWN OF CLINTON NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet Monday

(September 23) with Illinois Power Company officials to discuss

the utility's response to the September 5 shutdown of the Clinton

Nuclear Power Station. The facility is near Clinton, Illinois.

The meeting will be at 9 a.m. in the Third Floor Conference

Room, NRC Region III Office, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle,

Illinois. It is open to public observation.

The Clinton plant was shut down because of leakage from a

seal on a reactor circulation pump. The NRC is conducting a

special team inspection to review the circumstances surrounding

the shutdown. A second team inspection is underway to evaluate

plant operations more broadly.

The meeting will discuss the utility's evaluation of the

events associated with the shutdown, including its staff's

compliance with operating procedures. The utility's corrective

actions will also be covered.

#####

Nuclear Regulatory Commission news announcements are issued by

fax and by internet e-mail. If you wish to receive Region III

news releases by e-mail, send a message to opa3@nrc.gov. To

receive news announcements issued by NRC Headquarters and all NRC

regional offices by e-mail, send an e-mail message to

listproc@nrc.gov with the message: subscribe pr-opa followed by

your name. A weekly printed summary of news releases is

available by writing Office of Public Affairs, Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington DC 20555.

News releases are also available on the NRC's internet web site

at the address: <http://www.nrc.gov/OPA>.

A listing of NRC staff meetings with licensees and other

organization which are open to the public is available through a

computer online system (1-800/952-9676), the Fedworld online

system (1-800/303-9672), and the NRC's web site

<http://www.nrc.gov>. A recorded listing of meetings may be
heard by calling 1-800/952-9674.
Case 1:20-cv-22583-UU Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:20-cv-22583-UU Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 2 of 15
Case 1:20-cv-22583-UU Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 3 of 15
Case 1:20-cv-22583-UU Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 4 of 15
Case 1:20-cv-22583-UU Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 5 of 15
Case 1:20-cv-22583-UU Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 6 of 15
Case 1:20-cv-22583-UU Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 7 of 15
Case 1:20-cv-22583-UU Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 8 of 15
Case 1:20-cv-22583-UU Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 9 of 15
Case 1:20-cv-22583-UU Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 10 of 15
Case 1:20-cv-22583-UU Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 11 of 15
Case 1:20-cv-22583-UU Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 12 of 15
Case 1:20-cv-22583-UU Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 13 of 15
Case 1:20-cv-22583-UU Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 14 of 15
Case 1:20-cv-22583-UU Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 15 of 15
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-238

November 5, 1999

NRC AND UTAH CHOOSE PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS AS TRUSTEE

FOR ATLAS URANIUM MILL TAILINGS PILE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, with concurrence from the State of Utah, has

chosen PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PWC), a professional services organization, as the

trustee to continue cleanup of the Atlas company’s uranium mill tailings site in Moab, Utah.

The NRC will regulate PWC’s public health and safety activities during the remediation of the

mill tailings site.

The mill tailings pile resulted from operations of a uranium mill at the Moab site from

1956 until 1984. The facility had been owned by Atlas since 1962. Uranium is no longer

processed at the site, and the mill has been dismantled except for one building.

Under the terms of the trust agreement, the license for the site will be transferred from

Atlas to PWC. PWC will then be responsible for ongoing remediation, using funds and other

assets in the trust which were obtained as part of a settlement agreement and reorganization

resulting from a bankruptcy petition filed by the Atlas Company. The trust is expected to contain

approximately $7-8 million, including cash, assets and payments due from the Department of

Energy for reclamation work already completed.

NRC in May approved Atlas’ reclamation plan to decommission the site, which involves

re-grading the tailings to enhance drainage off the pile and installing an earth and rock cover

system over the pile. The cover system is intended to minimize radon escape, infiltration of rain

water into the tailings, and erosion caused by surface runoff from rain or flooding of the

Colorado River.

NRC issued a draft environmental impact statement on the site in January 1996 and

held public meetings in April 1994, February 1996, and September 1998 to discuss the Atlas

company’s proposal. A final environmental impact statement was issued in March.

The trust agreement calls for the NRC to select a trustee with the concurrence of the

State of Utah. NRC originally, in September, selected Dames & Moore as trustee, with the

concurrence of Utah. However, Dames & Moore’s decision in October not to accept the

trusteeship necessitated this second selection of a trustee.

###
Exhibit 10.1


 


TERMINATION AGREEMENT


 


THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT
(this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of March 31, 2021 (the “Effective Date”), by and
among American Physicians LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Sponsor”), and Edoc Acquisition Corp., a
Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Company”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the
Sponsor entered into that certain Administrative Support Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2020 (the “Administrative Support
Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the parties hereto
desire to, effective immediately as of the date first written above, terminate the Administrative Services Agreement as more specifically
provided herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties
hereto, in consideration of the covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


 


1.       Termination.
The parties hereto hereby acknowledge and agree that, effective as of the Effective Date, the Administrative Services Agreement and all
obligations of the Company and the Sponsor pursuant thereto will be terminated in all respects.


 


2.       Release
and Waiver. Effective as of the Effective Date, each of the parties hereto mutually release and discharge each other from all claims
or demands under or in connection with the Administrative Support Agreement. Sponsor hereby waives its right to receive any fees pursuant
to such agreement that may have been payable from November 9, 2020 to the date hereof.


 


3.       Further
Assurances. Each of the parties hereto hereby further covenants and agrees to execute and deliver all further documents and agreements
and take all further action that may be reasonably necessary or desirable in order to enforce and effectively implement the terms and
conditions of this Agreement.


 


4.       Successors
and Assigns. This Agreement is intended to bind, inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective
successors and assigns.


 


5.       Counterparts;
Governing Law. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts (including by means of facsimile or other electronic transmission),
each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument. This Agreement shall be governed
by the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to conflict of laws provisions.


 


6.       Headings.
The headings of the sections, paragraphs and subsections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect the
interpretation hereof.


 


*    *    *    *    *


 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
hereto have duly executed and delivered this Agreement effective as of the Effective Date.


 


	 	EDOC ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Kevin Chen
	 	Name:  	Kevin Chen
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	AMERICAN PHYSICIANS LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Xiaoping Becky Zhang
	 	Name:	Xiaoping Becky Zhang
	 	Title:	Managing Member



 


[Signature Page to
Administrative Support Agreement Termination]
Exhibit 31.1 

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**pursuant to Section 302 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, David B. Kaysen, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of DiametricsMedical, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:September 4, 2003
### [§103A. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–514, title XIII, §1301(j)(1), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2657]

Section, added Pub. L. 96–499, title XI, §1102(a), Dec. 5, 1980, 94 Stat. 2660; amended Pub. L. 96–595, §5(a), (b), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3467; Pub. L. 97–248, title II, §220(a)–(e), title III, §310(c)(3), (4), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 475, 476, 599; Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title I, §42(a)(2), title VI, §§611(a)–(c), 612(b), 624(b)(1), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 556, 901–903, 911, 924; Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1861, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2883, related to mortgage subsidy bonds. See section 143 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to bonds issued after Aug. 15, 1986, except as otherwise provided, see sections 1311 to 1318 of Pub. L. 99–514, set out as an Effective Date; Transitional Rules note under section 141 of this title.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No 99-173 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, August 10, 1999)

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste has

scheduled a technical meeting September 14-15 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in conference room T-2B3 of the

agency’s Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike.

The Committee will use this time to: prepare for sessions on risk communications with

stakeholders this fall in Las Vegas, Nevada; discuss the results of the Arthur Andersen review

of the agency’s waste management activities; and receive progress reports from NRC staff on

the decommissioning standard review plan and the status of dose models, and the waste

management research program plan.

The meetings will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day.

Those wishing to make oral statements should notify Dr. Richard Savio, 301-415-7363,

in advance. Other aspects of the meeting, including opportunities for public comment, will be

described in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register. ACNW meeting notices, transcripts

and letter reports are available on the internet, at http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

###
Case 2:20-mj-00047-SMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/02/2020 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:20-mj-00047-SMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/02/2020 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:20-mj-00047-SMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/02/2020 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:20-mj-00047-SMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/02/2020 Page 4 of 6
1st

Case 2:20-mj-00047-SMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/02/2020 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:20-mj-00047-SMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/02/2020 Page 6 of 6