alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFramework for a space shuttle main engine health monitoring systemA framework developed for a health management system (HMS) which is directed at improving the safety of operation of the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) is summarized. An emphasis was placed on near term technology through requirements to use existing SSME instrumentation and to demonstrate the HMS during SSME ground tests within five years. The HMS framework was developed through an analysis of SSME failure modes, fault detection algorithms, sensor technologies, and hardware architectures. A key feature of the HMS framework design is that a clear path from the ground test system to a flight HMS was maintained. Fault detection techniques based on time series, nonlinear regression, and clustering algorithms were developed and demonstrated on data from SSME ground test failures. The fault detection algorithms exhibited 100 percent detection of faults, had an extremely low false alarm rate, and were robust to sensor loss. These algorithms were incorporated into a hierarchical decision making strategy for overall assessment of SSME health. A preliminary design for a hardware architecture capable of supporting real time operation of the HMS functions was developed. Utilizing modular, commercial off-the-shelf components produced a reliable low cost design with the flexibility to incorporate advances in algorithm and sensor technology as they become available.Document ID19900012493Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHawman, Michael W.*(United Technologies Research Center East Hartford, CT., United States)*Galinaitis, William S.*(United Technologies Research Center East Hartford, CT., United States)*Tulpule, Sharayu*(United Technologies Research Center East Hartford, CT., United States)*Mattedi, Anita K.*(United Technologies Research Center East Hartford, CT., United States)*Kamenetz, Jeffrey*(United Technologies Corp. Windsor Locks, CT., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1990Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:185224UTRC-R90-997978NASA-CR-185224Accession Number90N21809Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 553-13-00CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-25626Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900012493.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 5.84 Production of documents in private litigation. ( a ) The production of records held by FEMA in response to a subpoena duces tecum or other demand issued pursuant to private litigation, whether or not served in accordance with the provisions of § 5.83 of this subpart, is prohibited absent authorization by the Chief Counsel.
( b ) Whenever an official or employee of FEMA, including any Regional Administrator, receives a subpoena or other demand for the production of Agency documents or material, he or she shall immediately notify and provide a copy of the demand to the Chief Counsel.
( c ) The Chief Counsel, after consultation with other appropriate officials as deemed necessary, shall promptly determine whether to disclose the material or documents identified in the subpoena or other demand. Generally, authorization to furnish the requested material or documents shall not be withheld unless their disclosure is prohibited by relevant law or for other compelling reasons.
( d ) Whenever a subpoena or demand commanding the production of any record is served upon any Agency employee other than as provided in § 5.83 of this subpart, or the response to a demand is required before the receipt of instructions from the Chief Counsel, such employee shall appear in response thereto, respectfully decline to produce the record(s) on the ground that it is prohibited by this section and state that the demand has been referred for the prompt consideration of the Chief Counsel.
( e ) Where the release of documents in response to a subpoena duces tecum is authorized by the Chief Counsel, the official having custody of the requested records will furnish, upon the request of the party seeking disclosure, authenticated copies of the documents. No official or employee of FEMA shall respond in strict compliance with the terms of a subpoena duces tecum unless specifically authorized by the Chief Counsel.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 20-CV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER GRANTING RECEIVER’S TWELFTH APPLICATION FOR ALLOWANCE 

AND PAYMENT OF PROFESSIONALS’ FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF

EXPENSES FOR APRIL 1, 2023 – JUNE 30, 2023

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Receiver Ryan K. Stumphauzer’s Twelfth

Application for Allowance and Payment of Professionals’ Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses 

for April 1, 2023 – June 30, 2023 [ECF No. 1663] (“Application”), filed on August 15, 2023. The 

Court has carefully reviewed the Application and is otherwise fully advised.

This is a complex receivership involving the operation of a merchant cash advance business

with a receivable balance, as of the date the Receivership was established, of over $400 million, 

and a group of investors that are seeking, collectively, more than $300 million dollars from the 

company. The Receiver and his professional team are managing numerous operational issues 

involving more than 1,300 merchants that are parties to merchant cash advance agreements with 

Par Funding. The Application and records submitted by the Receiver reflect that the Receiver and 

his professional team have reasonably and diligently discharged their duties. 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1667 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2023 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

The Receiver’s tasks in this case have included negotiating with Par Funding’s merchants

in an effort to reach settlements of MCA account balances; employing consultants to oversee and

manage Par Funding; pursuing various claims against non-parties that may generate additional

income to the Receivership Estate; assuming responsibilities over various residential and

commercial properties; responding to issues and document requests related to pending litigation

and investigations involving the Receivership Entities; communicating with the Defendants and

responding to discovery requests; and drafting status reports for the Court.

In performing these tasks, among others, the Receiver and his professional team have

provided a significant benefit to the Receivership Estate, investors, and creditors at rates that the

Court finds reasonable. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Application [ECF No. 1663] is GRANTED as

follows:

Professional Fees: $ 1,108,002.75

Expenses: $ 65,522.03

TOTAL: $ 1,173,524.78

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 16th day of August, 2023. 

__________________________________

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copies to: Counsel of Record

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1667 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2023 Page 2 of 2
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-147 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, October 3, 1997)

NRC STAFF PROPOSES ISSUANCE OF OPERATING LICENSE TO THE U.S. AIR FORCE

FOR AN EXISTING NUCLEAR RESEARCH REACTOR AT MCCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is considering issuing an operating

license to the U.S. Air Force for an existing research reactor at McClellan Air Force Base in

Sacramento, Calif.

The facility is presently operating under the authority of the Department of Defense and

is being used for research. The new license would authorize the Air Force to operate the

reactor as a research tool under the authority of the NRC at power levels not to exceed 2.3

megawatts thermal, its current capacity. The Air Force is seeking an NRC license as part of an

effort to expand its use of private industry in conducting research on its behalf.

Prior to issuance of the license, the facility will be inspected by NRC staff to determine

whether it has been constructed in accordance with the application submitted by the Air Force. .

Any member of the public whose interest may be affected and who wishes to participate in the

hearing process must file a written request for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene by

October 31.

Interested persons should consult a copy of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations

Chapter 2.714 for an explanation of the hearing and intervention process. A copy of the

applicable regulation is available at the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), 2120 L Street,

NW, Washington, D.C., or by calling the PDR at (202) 634-3273.

A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must be filed with the

Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555-

0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, or may be delivered to the PDR. A copy

of the petition should also be sent to the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555-0001, and to Col. Robert Gibson, SMALC/JA, 5219 Arnold Avenue, McClellan AFB, Sacramento, CA 95652-1085, attorney for the

licensee.

##
### **CHAPTER 22A—CONGRESSIONAL OFFICE FOR INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP**

Sec.
1151.
Congressional Office for International Leadership.
### §28e. Distribution of Precedents by Joint Committee on Printing of surplus sets;  additional printing, etc., of sets under authority of Joint Committee

(a) Any set of the Precedents printed and bound pursuant to subsection (a) of section 28b of this title, not needed to carry out the distributions required by sections 28b to 28e of this title, shall be distributed under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing.

(b) The Joint Committee on Printing may from time to time authorize and direct that additional sets of the Precedents, be printed, bound, and distributed in such manner as the Joint Committee determines will best carry out the purposes of sections 28b to 28e of this title.

(Pub. L. 94–551, §4, Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2538.)
### §§252 to 256. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–225, title IV, §405, Feb. 7, 1972, 86 Stat. 20

Sections 252 to 255, act Feb. 28, 1925, ch. 368, title III, §§314–317, 43 Stat. 1074, provided for general penalties for violations, expenses of election contests, no effect on State laws, and partial invalidity.

Section 256, act Feb. 28, 1925, ch. 368, title III, §301, 43 Stat. 1070, provided for citation of act Feb. 28, 1925, as the "Federal Corrupt Practices Act".

Such former provisions are covered generally by chapter 301 (§30101 et seq.) of Title 52, Voting and Elections.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 60 days after Feb. 7, 1972, see section 408 of Pub. L. 92–225, set out as an Effective Date note under section 30101 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

DRAGAN JANICIJEVIC, on his own 

behalf and on behalf of all other similarly 

situated crewmembers working aboard 

BAHAMAS PARADISE CRUISE 

LINE vessels,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR, LTD., 

PARADISE CRUISE LINE 

OPERATOR LTD. INC. a/k/a PARADISE 

CRUISE LINE OPERATOR LTD. d/b/a 

BAHAMAS PARADISE CRUISE LINE, 

BPCL MANAGEMENT, LLC d/b/a 

BAHAMAS PARADISE CRUISE LINE, LLC,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO 

DEFENDANT BCPL MANAGEMENT, LLC

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Notice of Partial Voluntary Dismissal Without 

Prejudice Only as to Defendant BCPL Management, LLC. ECF No. [14] (“Notice”). The Court 

has carefully reviewed the Notice and the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Notice, ECF No. [14] is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. Defendant BPCL Management, LLC is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

3. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs;

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on September 8, 2020.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2020 Page 2 of 2
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-104 July 5, 2000

NRC ISSUES LICENSE FOR SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION

AT CLOSED RANCHO SECO NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a license to the Sacramento Municipal Utility

District (SMUD) to store spent fuel from its Rancho Seco nuclear generating station in an independent

spent fuel storage installation at the plant site near Herald, California.

The plant permanently shut down in 1989 after 14 years of commercial operation.

The spent fuel, which is presently stored in a water pool at the site, will be placed in dry casks

on concrete storage pads. The pads will be surrounded by both a security fence and a perimeter fence.

NRC will conduct an inspection prior to and during fuel loading.

The facility will provide storage for up to 228.8 metric tons of uranium contained in

493 fuel assemblies. Up to 24 assemblies can be loaded into each cask. SMUD plans to use a modified

NUHOMS-24P model cask, designed by Transnuclear West, Inc. The license permits

storage for an initial term of 20 years, with the possibility of renewal.

The dry casks will provide the capacity to store all spent fuel generated by Rancho Seco during

its operating life.

Following receipt of a dry cask storage application filed by SMUD, NRC published a notice in

the Federal Register offering an opportunity for a public hearing. No requests for a hearing were

received.

Before issuing the license, the NRC staff conducted an environmental assessment, which found

no significant impact, and a safety review, which found that no radioactive materials would be released

from the casks under any credible accident conditions. Copies of the license are available for review at

the NRC Public Document Room located at 2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20555 and from

the NRC Office of Public Affairs.

##
### §2026. Senate Staff Health and Fitness Facility Revolving Fund

#### (a) Establishment

There is established in the Treasury of the United States a revolving fund to be known as the Senate Staff Health and Fitness Facility Revolving Fund ("the revolving fund").

#### (b) Deposit of receipts

The Architect of the Capitol shall deposit in the revolving fund—

(1) any amounts received as dues or other assessments for use of the Senate Staff Health and Fitness Facility, and

(2) any amounts received from the operation of the Senate waste recycling program.

#### (c) Availability of funds

Subject to the approval of the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, amounts in the revolving fund shall be available to the Architect of the Capitol, without fiscal year limitation, for payment of costs of the Senate Staff Health and Fitness Facility.

#### (d) Withdrawal of excess amounts

The Architect of the Capitol shall withdraw from the revolving fund and deposit in the Treasury of the United States as miscellaneous receipts all moneys in the revolving fund that the Architect determines are in excess of the current and reasonably foreseeable needs of the Senate Staff Health and Fitness Facility.

#### (e) Regulations

The Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate shall promulgate regulations pertaining to the operation and use of the Senate Staff Health and Fitness Facility.

(Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(2) [title I, §4], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–96; Pub. L. 108–7, div. H, title I, §1207, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 375.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 121f of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriations Act, 2001, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2001.

#### Amendments

2003—Subsecs. (a), (b)(1). Pub. L. 108–7, §1207(1), (2), inserted "Staff" after "Senate".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–7, §1207(3), inserted "Staff" after "costs of the Senate".

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 108–7, §1207(4), inserted "Staff" after "Senate".

Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 108–7, §1207(5), added subsec. (e) and struck out former subsec. (e) which read as follows: "Subject to the approval of the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate, the Architect of the Capitol may issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this section."
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-11 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Thursday, April 1, 1999)

NRC FINDS PERFORMANCE ‘ACCEPTABLE’

AT BRUNSWICK IN LATEST REVIEW

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance

remains acceptable with a decline in operation performance in the NRC’s latest plant

performance review at the Brunswick nuclear power plant, operated by Carolina Power

& Light Company near Southport, North Carolina.

In a letter to CP&L, NRC official Brian Bonser said while overall performance

was acceptable, “a decline in routine operation performance was noted.” Bonser

mentioned recent problems in “procedure usage, adherence, quality, technical content

and plant configuration control.”

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region

II Office of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power

plant in the nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of

plant performance and provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are being used as an interim measure to monitor

nuclear power plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after

suspending the Systematic Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a

new assessment program is developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every

12 to 24 months.

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will

provide quarterly performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators

and on inspection findings. This program will be tested at eight sites beginning in June

and will be extended to all plants next January. A full description of the new program is

available on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

#
§ 12.41 Prohibited films. ( a ) Importers of films, shall certify on Customs Form 3291 that the imported films contain no obscene or immoral matter, nor any matter advocating or urging treason or insurrection against the United States or forcible resistance to any law of the United States, nor any threat to take the life or inflict bodily harm upon any person in the United States. When imported films are claimed to be free of duty as American goods returned, this certification may be made on Customs Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent, in the space designated “Remarks” in lieu of on Form 3291.
( b ) Films exposed abroad by a foreign concern or individual shall be previewed by a qualified employee of the Customs Service before release. In case such films are imported as undeveloped negatives exposed abroad, the approximate number of feet shall be ascertained by weighing before they are allowed to be developed and printed and such film shall be previewed by a qualified employee of the Customs Service after having been developed and printed.
( c ) Any objectionable film shall be detained pending instructions from Headquarters, U.S. Customs Service or a decision of the court as to its final disposition.
[28 FR 14710, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61285, Oct. 13, 2015]
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.3

                                FIRST AMENDMENT

This First Amendment is entered and made as of October 6, 2000 (the
"Amendment") as an amendment to the Agreement dated as of July 29, 1994 by and
between US Airways, Inc. ("US Airways") (previously US Air, Inc.) and MESA
AIRLINES, INC., d/b/a/FLORIDAGULF AIRLINES ("Contractor") (the "Agreement").

                                  WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, US Airways and Contractor have entered into the Agreement; and

WHEREAS, US Airways and Contractor desire to amend certain provisions of the
Agreement;

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
hereinafter set forth and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is acknowledged, US Airways and Contractor hereby agree as
follows:

1. Section 9.01(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting that
provision in its entirety and substituting the following language in lieu
thereof:

     "(a) This Agreement will become effective on the date first written above
     and will continue in effect thereafter through July 29, 2005, unless it is
     terminated at an earlier date pursuant to one or more of the provisions of
     this Article 9."

2. Except as amended hereby, the Service Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by
their duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above
written.

MESA AIRLINES, INC.                       US AIRWAYS, INC.



/s/ Jonathan Ornstein                     /s/ Thomas M. Hanley    10/16/00
-----------------------------------       ----------------------------------
By: Jonathan Ornstein                     By: Thomas M. Hanley
Title: Chairman                           Title: Vice President
                                                 US Airway Express