alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3251. State legislative authority

#### (a) Authority of State legislature

Nothing in this subchapter shall be interpreted to preclude the enactment of State legislation providing for the implementation, consistent with the provisions of this subchapter, of the activities assisted under this subchapter. Any funds received by a State under this subchapter shall be subject to appropriation by the State legislature, consistent with the terms and conditions required under this subchapter.

#### (b) Interstate compacts and cooperative agreements

In the event that compliance with provisions of this subchapter would be enhanced by compacts and cooperative agreements between States, the consent of Congress is given to States to enter into such compacts and agreements to facilitate such compliance, subject to the approval of the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 113–128, title I, §191, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1603.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
### §§61i to 61j–1. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61i, Pub. L. 86–30, title I, May 20, 1959, 73 Stat. 48, which was from the Second Supplemental Appropriation Act, 1959, authorized Senate Majority and Minority Leaders to fix, effective May 1, 1959, basic salaries of research assistants authorized by S. Res. 158, agreed to Dec. 9, 1941, at not to exceed $8,820 per annum. See section 6131 of this title.

Section 61j, Pub. L. 93–371, §4, Aug. 13, 1974, 88 Stat. 429; Pub. L. 94–59, title I, §105, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 275; Pub. L. 116–94, div. E, title II, §212(a)(3)(A), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2775, set a maximum annual rate of compensation of $37,000 for administrative assistants in offices of Senate Majority and Minority Whips. Positions established by Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1970, for Offices of Senate Majority and Minority Whips, which Act, Pub. L. 91–145, Dec. 12, 1969, 83 Stat. 339, classified to former section 61j of this title, authorized the respective whips to appoint an administrative assistant, were abolished, see title I of Pub. L. 95–26, set out in part as a note under former section 61h–1 of this title. See, also, section 6134 of this title.

A prior section 61j, Pub. L. 91–145, Dec. 12, 1969, 83 Stat. 339, authorized Senate Majority and Minority Whips to each appoint and fix compensation of an administrative assistant and an executive secretary.

Section 61j–1, Pub. L. 94–59, title I, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 270, authorized Senate Majority and Minority Whips, effective July 1, 1975, each to appoint and fix compensation of a legislative assistant. The positions established by Pub. L. 94–59 for the Offices of Majority and Minority Whips were abolished effective Apr. 1, 1977, by Pub. L. 95–26, title I, May 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 80, set out as a note under section 61h–1 of this title. See, also, section 6134 of this title.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-00-44 August 8, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC ENVIRONMENTAL TEAM, MOBILE LABORATORY

TO VISIT ILLINOIS ARMY SITE AUG. 15-16

** Open for Public Visits on Tuesday, August 15 **

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission environmental monitoring team and its mobile laboratory

will be at the Savanna Army Depot near Savanna, Illinois, on August 15 and 16 to verify that low level

radioactive contamination at the site has been successfully removed.

The mobile laboratory will be open to visitors from 4:30 to 6 p.m. on Tuesday, August 15, and

the team members will be available to answer questions on the NRC’s inspection and environmental

monitoring program.

A small area on the site was contaminated with monazite sand, which contains thorium, a

naturally occurring radioactive material. The monazite sand, which had been stored at the site, was

sold to a private company, licensed by the Atomic Energy Commission, in the mid-1970's. The

contamination apparently occurred during the removal of the monazite material.

The monazite contamination was found by the Army during a survey of the Army Depot site in

1999. The Army has now completed removal of the contaminated material, and the NRC team will

perform radiation surveys and collect environmental samples to verify the effectiveness of the clean up.

The mobile laboratory will be parked adjacent to the Welcome Center at the main gate, which

is on the depot access road off of Illinois Highway 84, north of Savanna, IL

#####
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 743 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 743

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to remove the prohibition 
        on States and territories against lowering their taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2021

  Mr. Crapo (for himself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Portman, Mr. 
   Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Daines, Mr. Young, Mr. 
  Risch, and Mr. Thune) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to remove the prohibition 
        on States and territories against lowering their taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Fiscal Flexibility Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION OF USE OF CORONAVIRUS STATE FISCAL 
              RECOVERY FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 602(c) of the Social 
Security Act, as added by section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act 
of 2021, is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Further restriction on use of funds.--No State or 
        territory may use funds made available under this section for 
        deposit into any pension fund.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 602 of such Act is further 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)(2)(A), by striking ``, including, in 
        the case of a State or a territory, all modifications to the 
        State's or territory's tax revenue sources during the covered 
        period'';
            (2) in subsection (e), by striking ``such subsection,'' and 
        all that follows through the period and inserting ``such 
        subsection.''; and
            (3) in subsection (g)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (1); and
                    (B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (7) as 
                paragraphs (1) through (6), respectively.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the American Rescue Plan Act 
of 2021.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 206.67 Requirement when limitation is exceeded.

Whenever the limitation described in § 206.66 is exceeded, the Administrator must report to the Congress on the nature and extent of continuing emergency assistance requirements and shall propose additional legislation if necessary.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-33 April 4, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE WITH MIDWEST IMAGING

DIAGNOSTIC, INC. ON APPARENT VIOLATIONS OF NRC SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet April 10 with

representatives of Midwest Imaging Diagnostic, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, for a

predecisional enforcement conference on apparent radiation safety program

violations.

The meeting will start at 1:00 p.m. in the Third Floor Conference Room

of the NRC Region III Office, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois. It will

be open to public observation.

An NRC inspection in February determined that the clinic treated four

patients for hyperthyroidism using therapeutic quantities of sodium iodide

iodine-131. While the clinic's medical director is authorized by the NRC on

another license to perform this treatment, the clinic's NRC license only

allows diagnostic procedures to be conducted.

Radioisotopes are used in diagnostic procedures to provide x-ray type

images of tissues and organs or as tracers to assist the physician in the

diagnosis of a disease. Therapeutic treatment involves different procedures

in that the radioisotopes are administered to treat a diagnosed disease.

The NRC inspector also noted that the clinic did not, as required, have

a written quality management program which details policies and procedures for

the use of iodine-131.

Since the inspection, the clinic has applied to the NRC for a license

amendment to allow the use of iodine-131 for therapeutic purposes. In the

meantime, it has stopped conducting therapeutic treatments.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean the NRC has

determined that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be

taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes

and safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out

any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable

the company to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decisions on apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement

action, such as a fine, will be made at this conference. Those decisions will

be made by senior NRC officials at a later date.

####
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August
1, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Mark L. Lemond, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.
|  

|Date: September 10,
      2009 | By:/s/ Mark L.
      Lemond
|------------------------------ | ---------------------------
|                               | Mark L. Lemond             
|                               | President and              
|                               | Chief Executive Officer    

---
### §1103. Establishment of John C. Stennis Center for Public Service Training and Development

#### (a) Establishment

There is established in the legislative branch of the Government a center to be known as the "John C. Stennis Center for Public Service Training and Development".

#### (b) Board of Trustees

The Center shall be subject to the supervision and direction of a Board of Trustees. The Board shall be composed of seven members, as follows:

(1) Two members to be appointed by the majority leader of the Senate.

(2) One member to be appointed by the minority leader of the Senate.

(3) Two members to be appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives.

(4) One member to be appointed by the minority leader of the House of Representatives.

(5) The Executive Director of the Center, who shall serve as an ex officio member of the Board.

#### (c) Term of office

The term of office of each member of the Board appointed under paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4) of subsection (b) shall be six years, except that—

(1) the members first appointed under paragraphs (1) and (2) shall serve, as designated by the majority leader of the Senate, one for a term of two years, one for a term of four years, and one for a term of six years;

(2) the members first appointed under paragraphs (3) and (4) shall serve, as designated by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, one for a term of two years, one for a term of four years, and one for a term of six years; and

(3) a member appointed to fill a vacancy shall serve for the remainder of the term for which his predecessor was appointed and shall be appointed in the same manner as the original appointment for that vacancy was made.

#### (d) Travel and subsistence pay

Members of the Board (other than the Executive Director) shall serve without pay, but shall be entitled to reimbursement for travel, subsistence, and other necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their duties.

#### (e) Location of Center

The Center shall be located at or near Starkville, Mississippi, the location of Mississippi State University.

(Pub. L. 100–458, title I, §114, Oct. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2173.)
O RDER

– 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
No. DA 19

- 0558

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. MICHAEL ANDREW BUCK,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant

- Appellant in this matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of the
date of this Order. The response must be served upon all counsel of record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and Appellate Counsel’s Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give notice of this Order by mail to all counsel fo reco rd and to Defendant

- Appellant
at his last known address.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 14 2020

07/14/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0558
J. 

P.2d 344 (1995); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 

(1990) (where no statute or court rule provides for appeal, no right to 

appeal exists). Therefore we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

Douglas 

J. 

cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge 

Daniel Owens 

Carl E. G. Arnold 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2
466 P.2d 100

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James F. TURNBOW, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 8850.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

March 9, 1970.

Marvin Baggett, Jr., Farmington, for appellant.

*255James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Justin Reid, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellee.

OPINION

ANGEL, District Judge.

Defendant pleaded guilty in 1964 to second-degree murder and was sentenced to imprisonment of not less than three years nor more than life. He subsequently filed a petition under Rule 93 (§ 21-1-1 (93), N.M.S.A.1953 [Supp.1969]). From a denial of that petition defendant appeals, contending that he should have been sentenced to a fixed, determined number of years. We do not agree.

At the time of the offense, the applicable statutory penalty for second-degree murder was imprisonment “for any period of time not less than three years.” Section 40-24-10, N.M.S.A.1953. This statute provides for a minimum but not a maximum sentence. The Indeterminate Sentence Act (now repealed) further provided, in part, in § 41-17-1, N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp. 1961):

> *sentence*shall sentence the person for the term as prescribed by law for the particular crime of which he was convicted. The term of imprisonment of any person so convicted shall not exceed the maximum nor be less than the minimum term fixed by law. * * * ”

The precise question presented here was considered by the court in State v. Maestas, 63 N.M. 67, 313 P.2d 337 (1957), which was reconsidered and a similar sentence upheld in Torres v. State, 80 N.M. 511, 458 P.2d 586 (1969); see also State v. Sisneros, 81 N.M. 194, 464 P.2d 924 (Court of Appeals, filed January 23, 1970). They determined that in the absence of a maximum penalty set by the legislature the maximum limit for second-degree murder “as prescribed by law” is life imprisonment. Thus the court’s sentence in the present case was the proper imposition of both a minimum and maximum penalty as prescribed by law.

Can it be said that since the legislature did not provide for a maximum sentence Under § 40-24 — 10, supra, for the sentencing court to do so is an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power? We think not.

It is well established that the fixing of penalties is exclusively a legislative function. McCutcheon v. Cox, 71 N.M. 274, 377 P.2d 683 (1962). This case holds that in prescribing a minimum penalty, but not a maximum penalty, the legislature by implication authorized a penalty in excess of the minimum. Since a maximum penalty was authorized by implication, there can be no unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. State v. Sisneros, supra; Jones v. Cox, 73 N.M. 450, 389 P.2d 214 (1964); Starkey v. Cox, 73 N.M. 434, 389 P.2d 203 (1964); State v. Frederick, 74 N.M. 42, 390 P.2d 281 (1964).

Other points raised on appeal are disposed of by what has been stated. The order denying relief is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

COMPTON and WATSON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit A

Statement of Claim

Plaintiff Antonio Ricardo Vilarino

Weeks1

Average

Weekly 

Hours

Worked1

Hourly

Rate1

Average

Weekly

Amount

Paid1

Total

Unpaid

Overtime

Wages1

Total

Liquidated

Damages1

12/7/18 - 5/12/20 74.71 75 20.00 $ 1,008.62 $ 62,863.38 $ 62,863.38 $ 

$ 62,863.38 62,863.38 $ 

Total Unpaid Overtime Wages1 = 62,863.38 $ 

Total Liquidated Damages1 = 62,863.38 $ 

Total1 = 125,726.76 $ 

Period1

Unpaid Overtime Wages

1 Numbers are averages, estimates, and/or approximates. Numbers may change as information is uncovered

through the discovery process.

Case 0:20-cv-61405-WPD Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 1 of 1
### §4105. Purchase of paper, envelopes, etc., for stationery rooms of Senate and House

Paper, envelopes, and blank books required by the stationery rooms of the Senate and House of Representatives for sale to Senators and Members for official use may be purchased from the Director of the Government Publishing Office at actual cost thereof and payment therefor shall be made before delivery.

(June 5, 1920, ch. 253, §1, 41 Stat. 1036; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(d), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 110 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Stationery room of House of Representatives redesignated Office Supply Service.

"Director of the Government Publishing Office" substituted for "Public Printer" in text on authority of section 1301(d) of Pub. L. 113–235, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Conveyor Equipment Manufacturers Association (“CEMA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Conveyor Equipment Manufacturers Association, Naples, FL. The nature and scope of CEMA's standards development activities are: voluntary industry and ANSI standards, written for the mutual benefit of manufacturer, user, and distributor, associated with the proper identification, engineering, and application of conveyors and auxiliary equipment used in the material handling sector of the economy.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-23533 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2004, of Synagro Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Paul Withrow, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company and that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                    /s/ J. Paul Withrow
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    J. Paul Withrow
                                    November 5, 2004