alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-19 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, January 30, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a

meeting on February 18 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will

begin at 8:30 a.m. in Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, Md. The Subcommittee on Thermal-Hydraulic and Severe

Accident Phenomena will review elements of the NRC Office of

Nuclear Regulatory Research programs pertaining to thermalhydraulics. Some portions of the meeting may be closed.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, will be described in a Notice of Meeting

published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.3001 Scope.

This subpart implements the duty preference and related customs provisions applicable to imported and exported goods under the United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement (the CTPA) signed on November 22, 2006, and under the United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act (the “Act”), Public Law 112-42, 125 Stat. 462 (19 U.S.C. 3805 note). Except as otherwise specified in this subpart, the procedures and other requirements set forth in this subpart are in addition to the customs procedures and requirements of general application contained elsewhere in this chapter. Additional provisions implementing certain aspects of the CTPA and the Act are contained in Parts 24, 162, and 163 of this chapter.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5266 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5266

To reauthorize the program for infant and early childhood mental health 
                promotion, intervention, and treatment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 15, 2022

Mr. Kaine (for himself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the program for infant and early childhood mental health 
                promotion, intervention, and treatment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Investing in Infant and Early 
Childhood Mental Health Act''.

SEC. 2. INFANT AND EARLY CHILDHOOD MENTAL HEALTH PROMOTION, 
              INTERVENTION, AND TREATMENT.

    Section 399Z-2 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 280h-6) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g);
            (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
    ``(f) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary may, directly or by 
awarding grants or contracts to public and private nonprofit entities, 
provide training and technical assistance to eligible entities 
described in (d).''; and
            (3) in subsection (g), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``$20,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2018 through 
        2022'' and inserting ``$50,000,000 for the period of fiscal 
        years 2023 through 2027''.
                                 <all>
```
01/21/201 0 14:0 1 FAX 2024935142 FAA •> DMS @l001/004 

U FLYING SERVICE 

January 4, 2010 RECEIVED 

JAN t \ m 

HEARfNG DOCKET 

Fedei-?il Aviation Adminislration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wasliiiiglon, DC . 2U5f-)l 

ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur WriyhL Building - Suite 2WIOO0 

Tn the Matter oTCentral Flying Service, Inc. 

Doekol No. CP 

I-AA CIR No. 2009SWI lOOn 

Dear Sir or Madam: ' ' ' ^ 

Enclosed are the original and one copy of the Answer in the abovc-rclerenecd 

proceeding. 

We request that the 1 Icaring be held in Little Rock, Arkan.'jay. Further, we request 

thai the Hearing; not be scheduled to occur in the month of March 2010. 

Sincerely, 

CENTRAL FLYING SHRVICH. INC. 

(U^Ji iMiLiUU^ 

Richard N. Ilolbert 

Prc.«,idenl 

1501 Bond Street • Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 • 501-375-3245 • Fax 501-375-7274 
01/21/2010 14:01 FAX 2024935142 FAA DMS @l002/004 

In the Matter of: 

Cenlral Flying Service, inc. FAA Case No. 2009SW110011 

Docket No. 

ANSWER 

The Respondent tiles its Answer and .slates the following: 

Section 11. 

Paragraph I 

Paragraph 2 

Paragraph 3 

i'ai-agraph 4 

Paragraph 5 

Paragraph 6 

Paragraph 7 

Paragraph 8 

Paragraph 9 

Paragraph 10 

Paragraph 11 

Paragraph 1. 

Paragraph 2. 

Admitted 

Admitted 

Admitted 

Admitted 

Admitted 

Admitted 

Admitted 

Admitted 

Admitted 

- Admitted 

Admitted 

Denied 

Denied 

Section 111. 

Respondent respectfully asserts that FAA personnel improperly failed to accept a 

Voluntary [)isclo.sure proffered by Central personnel. I'urther, Respondent a.sserts ihat 

FAA personnel failed to follow guidance contained in FAA Order 2150.3B in assessing 

the Civil Penalty. 

'£AR/AiG DOCKET 
01/21/2010 14:02 FAX 2024935142 FAA ^ DMS g!003/004 

Reiipondent rcspeeifully requesLs that the Administraiive Law Judge enter an 

order ihat Respondent, Central Flying Service, Inc., is relieved of any civil penalty in this 

matter. 

Submitted this 4^'' day or.Ianuary, 2010. 

By: 

Richard N. Holbert 

President 

Central Flying Service, Inc. 

1501 Bond Avenue 

Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 

Telephone: 501-975-9308 

Fax: 501-375-7274 

Richard.holbeit@central.aero 
01/21/201 0 14:0 2 FAX 202493514 2 FAA •>• DMS 0004/00 4 

CF-RTIFICATL OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that an oiiginal and a copy of the foregoing Answer have been mailed 

this date by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to: 

Federal Aviation Adminislration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

And a copy of the Answer has been mailed by the same means to: 

Stellamaris Williams, Esq. 

Safely Enforcement Branch 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Southwest Region 

2601 Meachamlilvd 

For: Worth, Texas 76193-0007 

4-^jlLJl hi^AJdt^.. ^ 

Richard N. Holbert 

President 

Central Flying Service, Inc. 

1501 Bond Avenue 

Little Roek, Arkansas 72202
§ 118.23 Appeal to the Assistant Commissioner; procedure; status of CES operations. ( a ) *Appeal to the Assistant Commissioner.* Appeal of a port director's decision under § 118.21(a) or (b) must be filed with the Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, within 10 calendar days of receipt of the written notice of the adverse action. The appeal shall be filed in duplicate and shall set forth the CES operator's or entity's responses to the grounds specified by the port director in his written notice letter for the adverse action initiated. The Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, or his designee, shall render a written decision to the CES operator or entity, stating the reasons for the decision, by letter mailed within 30 working days following receipt of the appeal, unless the period for decision is extended with due notification to the CES operator or entity.
( b ) *Status of CES operations during appeal.* During this appeal period, an immediate suspension of a CES operator's or entity's selection and written agreement pursuant to § 118.21(a) of this part shall remain in effect. A proposed revocation of a CES operator's or entity's selection and cancellation of the written agreement pursuant to § 118.21(b)(1) through (5) of this part shall not take effect unless the appeal process under this paragraph has been concluded with a decision adverse to the operator.
( c ) *Effect of suspension or revocation.* Once a suspension or revocation action takes effect, the CES operator must cease CES operations. However, when CES operations are suspended or revoked and cancelled by Customs, it is the CES operator's responsibility to ensure that merchandise already at the CES is properly consigned to another location for inspection, as directed by the importer and approved by the port director.
[T.D. 96-57, 61 FR 39071, July 26, 1996]
000001/01390344_1 - 1 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT

OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-CV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP,

INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S OMNIBUS MOTION FOR FINAL JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Defendants, Joseph LaForte, Lisa 

McElhone and Joseph Cole Barleta’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response 

to Plaintiff’s Omnibus Motion for Final Judgment [D.E. 1214].

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED.

The deadline for the Defendants to file their Response to the Plaintiff’s Motion is July 1, 2022.

DONE AND ORDERED Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this ____ day of __________________, 2022.

____________________________________

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: Counsel of Record

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1220-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2022 Page 1 of 1
### §§2871, 2872. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–128, title V, §511(a), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1705

Section 2871, Pub. L. 105–220, title I, §136, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 999, established a performance accountability system. See section 3141 of this title.

Section 2872, Pub. L. 105–220, title I, §137, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1006, authorized appropriations for fiscal years 1999 through 2003.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3101 of this title.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

Walnut Creek Field Office

1450 Maria Lane, Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5378

CONTACT: Mark Hammond FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

Office: (510) 975-0254 RIV-9627

Home: (415) 674-1024

Pager: (800) 916-4952

NRC PROPOSES TO FINE COOPER $50,000

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has informed

Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) that it proposes to fine

the company $50,000 for a violation of NRC requirements at the

Cooper Nuclear Station in Brownville, Neb.

NPPD has 30 days to respond to the citation. During that

time it may pay the civil penalty or protest it. If a protest is

denied, the company may ask for a hearing.

This enforcement action results from an inspection by the

senior NRC resident inspector in November 1995 and a follow-on

NRC inspection conducted in February that found that main steam

tunnel blowout panels had been improperly modified. These panels

are designed to relieve pressure in the steam tunnel in the event

of a main steam line break and ensure that external forces on

primary containment are limited to protect the integrity of

primary containment.

The blowout panels were modified in June 1985 when

fiberglass was applied to prevent secondary containment leakage.

However, until identified by the NRC, no evaluation had been

performed to determine whether this modification constituted an

unreviewed safety question. Extensive analysis performed after

the modification was found shows that steam tunnel pressure could

have exceeded the licensed safety limit of 15 pounds per square

inch during a postulated main steam line break, without damaging

containment integrity.

In a letter to NPPD officials, L. Joe Callan, administrator

for NRC Region IV, said, "Although Cooper's analysis indicated

that the potential consequences of the conditions were minimal,

the significance of this violation is based on the fact that NPPD

operated Cooper in an unanalyzed condition from approximately

July 1985 until November 1995."

The violation has been classified at Severity Level III in

the NRC's four-level classification system. Severity Level I is

the most serious violation. The base civil penalty for a

Severity Level III violation is $50,000.
Cooper has undertaken corrective action that includes

removing the fiberglass and restoring the design function of the

panels, improving the description of the panels in the updated

safety analysis report, inspecting other blowout panels,

beginning a review of a random sample of past maintenance work

for unreviewed safety questions and unauthorized modifications,

and beginning the development of a high energy line break design

criteria document.

####
---

> Occupational Health and Safety (Commonwealth Employment) Act 1991 (Cwth)
> 
> 
> This report is provided in accordance with section 74 of the Australian Occupational Health and Safety (Commonwealth Employment) Act 1991 (Cwth) (OHS Act).
> 
> 
> Telstra believes that all workplace disease and injury is preventable and is committed to providing a safe workplace, one that is free from injury or disease.  To assist in achieving these aims, we have developed and implemented our own Telstra Care health and safety management system based on the Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 4804:2001 Occupational health and safety management systems - general guidelines on principles, systems and supporting techniques.
> 
> 
> This system focuses on leadership in safety, together with measurable accountabilities, through all levels of management.  It is underpinned by targeted training and a rigorous schedule of OHS Audits.  Since its inception in 1997, additional tools, resources and training courses have enhanced the Telstra Health and Safety Management System ensuring Telstra has continually improved safety at work.
> 
> 
> In the past year we have focussed on:
> 
> ensuring hazards are managed consistently across the Telstra business units so that a high standard of safety is achieved by all;further enhancement of our contractor management processes to ensure that contractors, their employees and sub-contractors can carry out their work safely; anddevelopment of health and safety information for Telstra employees working overseas.As a result of widespread prevention activities, Telstra's lost-time injuries reduced by 26% compared with the previous year and the lost-time injury frequency rate reduced from  7.4 to 6.7 (excludes Network Design and Construction Limited).
> 
> 
> For the 2002 fiscal year, in accordance with section 74 of the OHS Act, the following notices of accidents and dangerous occurrences were recorded:
> 
> 
> Incidents
> 
> Fatality
>     Serious personal injury
>     Prescribedincapacity
>     Dangerousoccurrence0
>     56
>     15
>     289
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Notices and directions
> 
> Type
>     NumberProvisional improvement notices (section 29)
>     0Directions not to disturb workplace (section 45)
>     0Prohibition notices issued by investigators (section 46)
>     0Improvement notices issued (section 47)
>     0

---

| |  | 
| |  |
HomeAbout NRCEmergency Preparedness & ResponseAbout Emergency  PreparednessEmergency Planning Zones

# Typical 10-Mile Plume Exposure Pathway EPZ Map

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, July 08, 2021
# Az Európai Unió C 297A/2005

| | ISSN 1725-518X |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 297A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 48. évfolyam2005. november 29. |

ISSN 1725-518X

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 297A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

48. évfolyam2005. november 29.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Közlemények |
| | Bizottság |
| 2005/C 297A/1 | Pályázati kiírás elnöki állás betöltésére a Közösségi Növényfajta-hivatalnál (A*14-es besorolás) (Személyzeti szabályzat 29. cikk (2) bekezdés) — COM/2005/10015 | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

III   Közlemények

Bizottság

2005/C 297A/1

Pályázati kiírás elnöki állás betöltésére a Közösségi Növényfajta-hivatalnál (A*14-es besorolás) (Személyzeti szabályzat 29. cikk (2) bekezdés) — COM/2005/10015

1

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

III Közlemények

Bizottság

| 29.11.2005 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 297/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2005

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 297/1

---

PÁLYÁZATI KIÍRÁS ELNÖKI ÁLLÁS BETÖLTÉSÉRE A KÖZÖSSÉGI NÖVÉNYFAJTA-HIVATALNÁL

(A*14-es besorolás)

(Személyzeti szabályzat 29. cikk (2) bekezdés)

COM/2005/10015

(2005/C 297 A/01)

A Közösségi Növényfajta-hivatal pályázatot ír ki az elnöki állás betöltésére.

A pályázónak az Európai Unió valamely tagállamának állampolgárságával kell rendelkeznie.

Az elnököt a Tanács nevezi ki a Bizottság által a Hivatal igazgatótanácsa véleményének kikérését követően javasolt jelöltek jegyzéke alapján. A fizetés és az alkalmazási feltételek azonosak a személyzeti szabályzatban a Közösségek A*14 besorolású tisztviselői számára meghatározott előírásokkal. A Közösségi Növényfajta-hivatal és a Bizottság esélyegyenlőségi politikát alkalmaz.

Munkaköri leírás, pályázati űrlapok és a pályázatok benyújtásához szükséges útmutató a következő címen tölthetők le az internetről:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

vagy

http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm

A pályázatok beérkezésének határideje 2005. december 31. (a részeleteket lásd a pályázati útmutatóban).

---
### §2105. Procedures in addition to other rights of employees

The rights and remedies provided to employees by this chapter are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other contractual or statutory rights and remedies of the employees, and are not intended to alter or affect such rights and remedies, except that the period of notification required by this chapter shall run concurrently with any period of notification required by contract or by any other statute.

(Pub. L. 100–379, §6, Aug. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 894.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 6 months after Aug. 4, 1988, see section 11 of Pub. L. 100–379, set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.
Fracture Design and Stimulation – Monitoring

Well Construction & Operations technical workshop 

In support of the EPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study

March 10-11, 2011,

Mike Eberhard, P.E.

Technical Manager

Halliburton Energy Services

Denver, CO 

303.899.4719
© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 2

Agenda

 Well Construction

 Before the 

Treatment

 Well Site Rig-up

 Monitoring the 

Treatment

 After the Frac

July ,1947 - Stanolind Oil and Gas 1st Job: Klepper No. 1
© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 3

Well Construction

 Protect shallow formations

 Protect producing formations

 Withstand treating pressures
© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 4

Before the Treatment

 Treating rate and pressure

 Equipment and materials
© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 5

Well Site Rig-up

 Safety meetings
© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 6

Well Site Rig-up

 Safety meetings

 High pressure and low pressure

 Pressure testing

 Protection systems tested

 Flowmeter calibration

 Data acquisition computers
© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 7

Simplified Location Schematic

Dens

PO

WH

High pressure pumps

Pre gel blender

Liquid additive tanks

Proppant storage

Proppant blender

Dens

PO

Flowmeter

Stop valve

Pressure transducer

Kick-out

Densometer

Pop-off

High pressure

Low pressure

Treatment 

Monitoring Van

1 2 3

4

5

6

7

1 – Annulus pressure gauge

2 – Surface treating pressure gauge

3 – Downhole densometer

4 – Slurry flow meter

5 – Clean flow meter

6 – Gel flow meter

7 – Liquid additive flow meters

Dens

PO

WH

High pressure pumps

Pre gel blender

Liquid additive tanks

Proppant storage

Proppant blender

Dens

PO

Flowmeter

Stop valve

Pressure transducer

Kick-out

Densometer

Pop-off

High pressure

Low pressure

Treatment 

Monitoring Van

1 2 3

4

5

6

7

1 – Annulus pressure gauge

2 – Surface treating pressure gauge

3 – Downhole densometer

4 – Slurry flow meter

5 – Clean flow meter

6 – Gel flow meter

7 – Liquid additive flow meters

Water 

Tanks
© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 8

Monitoring Equipment
© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 9

Blender Photos
© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 10

Pressure Control and QC
© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 11

Monitoring the Treatment

 Rate is brought up slowly

 Several people involved

 Treatment parameters

 Rate, pressure, density

 Material parameters

WHTP  BHTP Ppipe  Pperf  Phyd
© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 12

Treatment Chart
© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 13

Additives Chart
© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 14

Additional Real-time Information
© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 15

After the Frac

 Safety meeting

 Post treatment inventory

 Post treatment report
© 2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 16

Questions

 Well Construction

 Before the Treatment

 Well Site Rig-up

 Monitoring the 

Treatment

 After the Frac
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No.1 to the
annual report of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2013,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guy Bernstein, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date:  December 31, 2014 | /s/ Guy Bernstein      
|------------------------ | -----------------------
|                         | Guy Bernstein          
|                         | Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tufco Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 14, 2005
    /s/ Michael B. WheelerMichael B. WheelerVice President and Chief Financial Officer 19