alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-52 July 21, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC PROPOSES $5,500 FINE FOR PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER

FOR VIOLATION INVOLVING TREATMENT OF WHISTLEBLOWER

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $5,500 fine against the U.S. Department

of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, for a violation of agency requirements involving the

treatment of a worker who raised safety concerns. The action is based on the findings of the U.S. Merit

Systems Protection Board, which ruled that the center discriminated against the research nurse because

of her activities.

Between April 1997 and May 1998, the employee was subjected to a hostile work environment

for engaging in whistleblowing, a federally protected activity, the NRC determined. Specifically, the

NRC found that the nurse, who no longer works at the facility, was isolated by her supervisor and

experienced significant negative changes to her working conditions after she raised issues regarding

the adequacy of consent forms signed by participants in a research study. Among the changes were

threats of dismissal, exclusion from work discussions and unfounded accusations of criminal activity.

The worker approached the U.S. Food and Drug Administration with her concerns in April

1997 and the NRC in June 1997.

The case was also considered by the Merit Systems Protection Board, which issued its decision

on April 16, 1999. While the board did not find discrimination had occurred with respect to most of

the specific incidents raised by the nurse, it did conclude that discrimination occurred when the

individual was subjected to intolerable working conditions and when she was terminated prior to the

expiration of her term employment.

VA officials are required to respond to the Notice of Violation within 30 days.

#
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-135 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, October 9, 1996)

NOTE TO EDITORS -- ACRS MEETING

Two subcommittees of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) have scheduled a

joint technical meeting on October 22, in Rockville

to discuss steam generator tube integrity issues.

The meeting of the ACRS subcommittees on Materials and

Metallurgy and on Severe Accidents, is open to the public. It

will begin at 8:30 a.m. in Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike.

Other aspects of the meeting, including the opportunity for

public comment, are described in a Notice of Meeting published in

the October 9 edition of the Federal Register.

#
Exhibit A

Case 1:20-cv-22508-JEM Document 29-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2020 Page 1 of 2
From:

To: 

Subject:

Date: 

Attachments:

Fausto Sanchez

"I all[en Iuck"· Paralegal I uck

RE: DEMAND FORPAYMENT/ Payment Past-Due from UNIR / Mater ialBreach by UNIR/ MarconiInternational 

University ("MIU" or the "University") / Our Client: Laura Ricci ("Laura Ricci"or "Ms .Ricci")/

Friday, June 19, 2020 4:25:00 PM

imaae004.Dna, 

image005.Dng. 

image006.png. 

imaae007.Dna.

2020-06-18 Complaint Final Unredacted.Ddf

2020 -06 -1 8 Exhibit A to Comolaint.Pdf

2020-06 -18 Exhibit B to Comolaint.odf 

2020-06-18 Exhibit C to Comolaint.odf 

imaae003.Dna,

Lauren :

Attached is an unredacted version of the Complaint and exhibits.

I'd previously asked if your client will agree to waive confidentiality and file these unredacted 

versions publicly. Given the position taken in your letter, it appeared Ms. Ricci intendedon making 

these matters public, anyway. But, so that there is no confusion, please state Ms. Ricci's position on 

this. Thank you.

Regards,

Fausto Sanchez 

Prutner

SANC HEZ 

FISC HER 

LEVINE, LLP

120 0 B1icke ll A ve nue , S te. 75 0

M iami , Florida 33131

Tel: (305) 925-9947

Email: faanchez@stl-Jawcom

Web s ite : www.sfl-law.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Tilis message and any attachments are intended only for the addressee and may contain 

info1mation that is privileged and confidential. If you have received this message in error, please do not read, use, copy, distribute, 

or disclose the contents of the message and any attachments. Instead, please delete the message and any attachments and notify

the senderimmediately. TI1ank you .

From: Lauren Luck <lau ren@lau renluck.com>

Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 2:23 PM

To: Fausto Sanchez <fsanchez@s fl -law.com >; Paralegal Luck <paralegal@laurenluck .com>

Subject: RE: DEM AN D FORPAYMENT / Payment Past-Due from UNIR / M a t er i a l Breach by UNIR /

M arco ni Int ern ational University ("MIU" or the "Universit y") / Our Client: Laura Ricci ("Laura Ricci" or 

"Ms. Ricci") /

That' s correct.

From: Fausto Sanchez <fsanchez@sfl- law.com >

Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 2:22 PM

Case 1:20-cv-22508-JEM Document 29-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2020 Page 2 of 2
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-250

November 26, 1999

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

(ACRS) has scheduled a meeting December 2-4 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in Conference Room T-2B3 of the

agency’s Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. The daily agenda is as

follows:

Thursday, December 2

8:30 - 8:45 a.m. -- Opening remarks by the ACRS Chairman.

8:45 - 10:15 a.m. -- Proposed final amendment to 10 CFR 50.55a on the elimination of the

120-month in-service inspection and in-service testing programs update requirement.

10:30 a.m. - Noon -- Discussion of “Low-Power and Shutdown Operations Risk Insights” report.

1:00 - 2:30 p.m. -- Discussion of license renewal application for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Plant and

the associated safety evaluation report.

2:30 - 2:45 p.m. -- Break.

2:45 - 3:15 p.m. -- Future ACRS activities.

3:15 - 3:30 p.m. -- Reconciliation of ACRS comments and recommendations.

3:30 - 4:00 p.m. -- Planning and procedures subcommittee report.

4:00 - 7:00 p.m. -- Discussion of proposed ACRS reports.

Friday, December 3

8:30 - 8:35 a.m. -- Opening remarks by the ACRS Chairman.

8:35 - 10:00 a.m. -- Proposed resolution of generic safety issues 190 and 166.

10:15 - 11:45 a.m. -- Discussion of “A Technique for Human Event Analysis (ATHEANA).”

11:45 - Noon -- Subcommittee report.

1:30 - 2:00 p.m. -- NRC Safety Research Program Report to the Commission.

2:00 - 2:30 p.m. -- Election of officers for Calendar Year-2000.

2:30 - 3:30 p.m. -- Break and preparation of draft ACRS reports.

3:30 - 7:00 p.m. -- Discussion of proposed ACRS reports.

Saturday, December 4

8:30 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. -- Discussion of proposed ACRS reports.

2:00 - 2:30 p.m. -- Miscellaneous.
Although meetings of the ACRS are open, they are not part of the agency’s normal

hearing process. The ACRS, an advisory committee group to the Commission, conducts

independent, highly technical reviews of safety considerations related to nuclear facilities.

While anyone may attend the meeting, the committee will consider only oral or written

statements arranged in advance and limited to specific matters described in a Notice of Meeting

published in the Federal Register. ACRS meeting agendas, transcripts, and letter reports are

available on the internet, at http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW

Those seeking information on opportunities to present oral statements or on schedule

changes should contact Sam Duraiswamy, at 301-415-7364.

###
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

Walnut Creek Field Office

1450 Maria Lane, Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5378

RIV-4597

CONTACT: Mark Hammond

August 1, 1997

Office: (510) 975-0254 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Home:

(415) 674-1024 Pager: (800)

916-4952 Email:

mfh2@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES ON-SITE REPRESENTATIVE

FOR HANFORD TANK WASTE REMEDIATION PROJECT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has assigned a full-time representative to the

Hanford Site outside Richland, Wash., where the Department of Energy (DOE) is developing a

program for immobilizing highly radioactive waste currently contained in underground tanks.

Dr. Walter J. Pasciak, a 24-year NRC veteran, began his duties in late July at Hanford,

first established in World War II and once used for the production of plutonium for nuclear

weapons. Dr. Pasciak is a member of a Hanford Tank Waste Remediation System Section that

NRC created last year within its Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards.

The NRC assigned an on-site representative to Hanford as part of its work with an

independent regulatory unit that DOE created at its Richland Operations Office for the tank

waste project. During the current first phase of a program to privatize the Hanford tank clean-up

work, NRC is assisting the DOE regulatory unit in patterning its oversight of contractors in a

manner consistent with the NRC’s regulatory approach.

An important goal of this first phase is to develop an effective regulatory program that

could be put into effect in the second phase, about 2005. A final decision may be made then for

the NRC to assume regulatory oversight of the DOE contactor selected for the Tank Waste

Remediation System clean-up work.

The NRC is now working to increase its knowledge and understanding of the site tank

farms, their associated hazards and potential remediation processes. NRC and DOE

interactions during this initial phase are governed by a memorandum of understanding signed in

January.

Dr. Pasciak spent the last 15 years at NRC Region I in King of Prussia, Pa., where he

was a branch chief in the Division of Reactor Projects and a section chief in radiological

assessment. Earlier, he served at NRC headquarters in environmental and radiological

assessment posts. He holds a Ph.D. in environmental engineering from Johns Hopkins

University in Baltimore, Md., and a master’s degree in nuclear engineering from Catholic

University of America in Washington, D.C.
Hanford has 177 underground tanks that contain 55 million gallons of waste. Sixtyseven of the tanks are known or suspected to have leaked into the ground.

###
#### § 5.83 Authority to accept service of subpoenas.

In all legal proceedings between private litigants, a subpoena duces tecum or subpoena ad testificandum or other demand by a court or other authority for the production of records held by FEMA Regional offices or for the oral or written testimony of FEMA Regional employees should be addressed to the appropriate Regional Administrator listed in § 5.26. For all other records or testimony, the subpoena should be addressed to the Chief Counsel, FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472 Washington, DC 20472. No other official or employee of FEMA is authorized to accept service of subpoenas on behalf of the Agency.
### §4104. American goods to be preferred in purchases for Senate and House

The Secretary of the Senate and the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives shall, in disbursing the public moneys for the use of the two Houses, respectively, purchase only articles the growth and manufacture of the United States, provided the articles required can be procured of such growth and manufacture upon as good terms as to quality and price as are demanded for like articles of foreign growth and manufacture.

(R.S. §69; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(57), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1738.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 109 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

R.S. §69 derived from act June 17, 1844, ch. 105, §1, 5 Stat. 681.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "Chief Administrative Officer" for "Clerk".
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132997 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman, Justices v SC: 132997 COA: 274952 Hillsdale CC: 06-301069-FH AARON ROMAINE HEARN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 16, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented shou ld be reviewed by this Court.

s0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
#### § 206.4 State emergency plans.

The State shall set forth in its emergency plan all responsibilities and actions specified in the Stafford Act and these regulations that are required of the State and its political subdivisions to prepare for and respond to major disasters and emergencies and to facilitate the delivery of Federal disaster assistance. Although not mandatory, prior to the adoption of the final plan, the State is encouraged to circulate the plan to local governments for review and comment.

[55 FR 2288, Jan. 23, 1990, 55 FR 5458, Feb. 15, 1990]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-046 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, March 21, 1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Safety Research Committee will hold its next

meeting on April 3-4 in Rockville, Maryland.

The committee provides advice to the Director of the NRC's

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. The meeting, which is

open to the public, will begin at 9:00 a.m. each day in Room 10A1

of the NRC's Two White Flint North building at 11545 Rockville

Pike. Discussions will include technical reports from several

subcommittees of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safety with

senior NRC staff.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, are described in a Notice of Meeting published in

the March 21 edition of the Federal Register.

#
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORBUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENTAlaska                                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Delta WSR Map                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| Print Page                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| Map Disclaimer:  Map is for planning purposes only and may not be to scale.                                                                                                                                                                                   |   |
| Last updated: 06-09-2016                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |        |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| USA.GOV                | 	   No Fear Act                | 	   DOI                | 	   Disclaimer                | 	   About BLM                | 	   Notices                | 	   Social Media Policy |
| Privacy Policy                | 	   FOIA                | 	   Kids Policy                | 	   Contact Us                | 	   Accessibility                | 	   Site Map                | 	   Home   |
### §483. Application of other laws; existing rights and remedies; exclusiveness of remedy for challenging election

No labor organization shall be required by law to conduct elections of officers with greater frequency or in a different form or manner than is required by its own constitution or bylaws, except as otherwise provided by this subchapter. Existing rights and remedies to enforce the constitution and bylaws of a labor organization with respect to elections prior to the conduct thereof shall not be affected by the provisions of this subchapter. The remedy provided by this subchapter for challenging an election already conducted shall be exclusive.

(Pub. L. 86–257, title IV, §403, Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 534.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable ninety days after Sept. 14, 1959, in the case of certain labor organizations, see section 404 of Pub. L. 86–257, set out as a note under section 481 of this title.
### §177. Poet Laureate Consultant in Poetry

#### (a) Recognition

The Congress recognizes that the Consultant in Poetry to the Library of Congress has for some time occupied a position of prominence in the life of the Nation, has spoken effectively for literary causes, and has occasionally performed duties and functions sometimes associated with the position of poet laureate in other nations and societies. Individuals are appointed to the position of Consultant in Poetry by the Librarian of Congress for one- or two-year terms solely on the basis of literary merit, and are compensated from endowment funds administered by the Library of Congress Trust Fund Board. The Congress further recognizes this position is equivalent to that of Poet Laureate of the United States.

#### (b) Position established

(1) There is established in the Library of Congress the position of Poet Laureate Consultant in Poetry. The Poet Laureate Consultant in Poetry shall be appointed by the Librarian of Congress pursuant to the same procedures of appointment as established on December 20, 1985, for the Consultant in Poetry to the Library of Congress.

(2) Each department and office of the Federal Government is encouraged to make use of the services of the Poet Laureate Consultant in Poetry for ceremonial and other occasions of celebration under such procedures as the Librarian of Congress shall approve designed to assure that participation under this paragraph does not impair the continuation of the work of the individual chosen to fill the position of Poet Laureate Consultant in Poetry.

#### (c) Poetry program

(1) The Chairperson of the National Endowment for the Arts, with the advice of the National Council on the Arts, shall annually sponsor a program at which the Poet Laureate Consultant in Poetry will present a major work or the work of other distinguished poets.

(2) There are authorized to be appropriated to the National Endowment for the Arts $10,000 for the fiscal year 1987 and for each succeeding fiscal year ending prior to October 1, 1990, for the purpose of carrying out this subsection.

(Pub. L. 99–194, title VI, §601, Dec. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 1347.)
### §190f. General appropriation bills

#### (a) Repealed. Pub. L. 91–510, title I, §108(d), Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1149

#### (b) Standard appropriation classification schedule

The Committees on Appropriations of the two Houses 1 are authorized and directed, acting jointly, to develop a standard appropriation classification schedule which will clearly define in concise and uniform accounts the subtotals of appropriations asked for by agencies in the executive branch of the Government. That part of the printed hearings containing each such agency's request for appropriations shall be preceded by such a schedule.

#### (c) Nonconsideration if a provision reappropriates unexpended balances

No general appropriation bill or amendment thereto shall be received or considered in either House 1 if it contains a provision reappropriating unexpended balances of appropriations; except that this provision shall not apply to appropriations in continuation of appropriations for public works on which work has commenced.

(Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title I, §139(a), (b), (c), 60 Stat. 833; Pub. L. 91–510, title I, §108(d), Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1149.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section constitutes subsections (a) to (c) of section 139 of act Aug. 2, 1946. Subsection (d) of section 139, which required the two Houses of Congress to make a study of existing permanent appropriations with a view to limiting the number thereof and to recommending what permanent appropriations should be discontinued, and of the disposition of funds resulting from the sale of Government property or services by all departments and agencies in the executive branch of the Government with a view to recommending a uniform system of control with respect to those funds, was omitted from the Code as being of a temporary character.

#### Amendments

1970—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 91–510 repealed prohibition against consideration of any general appropriation bill in either House unless prior to such consideration printed committee hearings and reports on the bill have been available for at least three calendar days for the Members of the House considering the bill, which was incorporated in section 190a(f) of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–510 effective immediately prior to noon on Jan. 3, 1971, see section 601(1) of Pub. L. 91–510, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 2, 1947, see section 142 of act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title I, 60 Stat. 834.

#### Partial Repeal

Section 2(a), S. Res. 274, Ninety-sixth Congress, Nov. 14, 1979, provided in part that this section, insofar as it relates to the Senate, is repealed. See Standing Rules of the Senate.

1 See Partial Repeal note below.
### §3908. Definitions

For purposes of applying this chapter, the terms "employing office" and "covered employee" have the meanings given those terms in section 401 of title 3.

(Added Pub. L. 104–331, §3(c), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4071.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1997, see section 3(d) of Pub. L. 104–331, set out as a note under section 1296 of this title.
December 15, 2010 

Modeling files generated by AECOM for APS to estimate visibility improvement from APS’s 

proposed alternative to BART for Four Corners Power Plant were submitted to EPA on a CD. 

These modeling files are too large and numerous to post on our website and are not in an 

acceptable format to post at www.regulations.gov. These files are available upon request. 

Please send an email r9air_fcppbart@epa.gov or call Anita Lee at 415-972-3958. 

Thank you.