alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 30-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 1 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 30-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 2 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 30-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 3 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 30-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 4 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 30-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 5 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 30-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 6 of 7
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 30-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 7 of 7
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the annual report of China Digital Communication Group (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wu
Jiangcheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
      April 15, 2009
                
                /s/
      Wu JiangchengWu
      JiangchengChief
      Financial Officer
#### § 147.660 Recipient.

*Recipient* means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, unit of government (except a Federal agency) or legal entity, however organized, that receives an award directly from a Federal agency.
#### Umar M. ABDULLAH, also known as Otha Townsend, Appellant, v. Sheryl Ramstad HVASS, Commissioner of Corrections; Eric Skon, Assistant Commissioner of Corrections; David Crist, Warden of Stillwater Correctional Facility; Regina Stepney, Head Casemanager for Stillwater Facility; Wayne King, Medical Technical; Haef, Lieutenant Officer for Stillwater Facility; John Doe, (9) (unknown) Correctional Officers, Appellees.

No. 01-3009.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 3, 2002.

Filed May 6, 2002.

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Umar M. Abdullah appeals the district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) of Abdullah’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm the district court. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-16 February 13, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC, OPERATOR OF FITZPATRICK PLANT TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of the New York Power Authority on Thursday, February

19, to discuss apparent violations of agency requirements

involving a reactor system at the James A. FitzPatrick nuclear

power plant. The authority owns and operates the Scriba, N.Y.,

plant.

The predecisional enforcement conference will begin at 10

a.m. in the Public Meeting Room at the NRC Region 1 office in

King of Prussia, Pa. It will be open to the public for

observation.

Two apparent violations were identified by an NRC

inspection and pertain to the design of the traversing incore

probe system, which is used to calibrate reactor power monitors.

They involve the introduction of an unresolved safety question

because prior NRC review and approval was required, but not

obtained, before the system was installed. This change resulted

in the possibility that associated containment isolation valves

would not remain shut under all conditions.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement

conference does not mean that the NRC has determined a violation

has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather,

the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity

to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its

proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this

conference. That decision will be made by NRC officials at a

later time.
2

#
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-98-32 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Wednesday, April 22, 1998)

NRC STAFF ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ORDER MODIFYING RADIOACTIVE

MATERIAL LICENSE OF A PHYSICIAN IN PUERTO RICO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a confirmatory order to Dr.

José M. Colón Vaquer of Manati, Puerto Rico which modifies the license to discontinue

authorization for use of a Strontium-90 eye applicator and requires that the source be kept

in locked, safe storage. Dr. Colón Vaquer had notified the NRC in a March 6 letter that he

had ceased use of the source and had placed it in safe, secure storage.

Strontium-90 is a licensed, radioactive material the physician is authorized by the

NRC to possess for use in the medical treatment of superficial eye conditions.

NRC officials said the order was issued because agency inspections at the

physician’s facilities resulted in numerous violations of NRC requirements, involving two

misadministrations to patients and use of licensed material during a period when the

physician’s license to possess and use the material was expired.

The order confirms actions the physician has agreed to take pending further

possible regulatory action and resolution of the NRC concerns.

#
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43127

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

DANIEL EPPS WILLIAMS

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 315

Filed: January 8, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bingham County. Hon. Darren B. Simpson , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and consecutive unified terms of twenty

- five years, with minimum periods of confinement of nine years , for two counts of sexual abuse of a child under the age of sixteen

, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

____________________________ ____________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Daniel Epps Williams pled guilty to two counts of sexual abuse of a child under the age

of sixteen. I.C. § 18

- 1506(1)(b)

. In exchange for his guilty pleas, additional charges were

dismissed. The district court sentenced Williams to consecutive unified terms of twenty

- five

years, with minimum periods of confinement of nine years

. Williams appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and2

need not b e repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district co urt abused its discretion.

Therefore, Williams ’s judgment of conviction and sentence s are affirmed.
### §288b. Requirements for authorizing representation activity

#### (a) Direction of Joint Leadership Group or Senate resolution

The Counsel shall defend the Senate or a committee, subcommittee, Member, officer, or employee of the Senate under section 288c of this title only when directed to do so by two-thirds of the Members of the Joint Leadership Group or by the adoption of a resolution by the Senate.

#### (b) Civil action to enforce subpena

The Counsel shall bring a civil action to enforce a subpena of the Senate or a committee or subcommittee of the Senate under section 288d of this title only when directed to do so by the adoption of a resolution by the Senate.

#### (c) Intervention or appearance

The Counsel shall intervene or appear as amicus curiae under section 288e of this title only when directed to do so by a resolution adopted by the Senate when such intervention or appearance is to be made in the name of the Senate or in the name of an officer, committee, subcommittee, or chairman of a committee or subcommittee of the Senate.

#### (d) Immunity proceedings

The Counsel shall serve as the duly authorized representative in obtaining an order granting immunity under section 288f of this title of—

(1) the Senate when directed to do so by an affirmative vote of a majority of the Members present of the Senate; or

(2) a committee or subcommittee of the Senate when directed to do so by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members of the full committee.

#### (e) Resolution recommendations

The Office shall make no recommendation with respect to the consideration of a resolution under this section.

(Pub. L. 95–521, title VII, §703, Oct. 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 1877.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 3, 1979, see section 717 of Pub. L. 95–521, set out as a note under section 288 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 115
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 115 appear at 72 FR 50038, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 115.36 Indemnity settlements. ( a ) An indemnity settlement occurs when a defaulted Principal and its Surety agree upon an amount, less than the actual loss under the bond, which will satisfy the Principal's indebtedness to the Surety. Sureties must not agree to any indemnity settlement proposal or enter into any such agreement without SBA's concurrence.
( b ) Any settlement proposal submitted for SBA's consideration must include current financial information, including financial statements, tax returns, and credit reports, together with the Surety's written recommendations. It should also indicate whether the Principal is interested in further bonding.
( c ) The Surety must pay SBA its *pro rata* share of the settlement amount within 45 days of receipt. Prior to closing the file on a Principal, the Surety must certify that SBA has received its *pro rata* share of all indemnity recovery.
[61 FR 3271, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 79 FR 2087, Jan. 13, 2014; 81 FR 23566, Apr. 22, 2016]
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Irving Trust Company, as Trustee under the Will of Charles W. Turner, Deceased, Respondent. Irving Spieler, Appellant; Pierrepont E. Twitchell, as Administrator of the Estate of Charles W. Turner, Jr., Deceased, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [179 Misc. 217.]
SNAP application - Unilever/Ben&Jerry's 

Monica Shimamura to: Gosselin, Pete 02/20/2009 05:15 PM

Cc: "Gerrard, Alan", "Shakalis, Andrew" <Andrew.Shakalis@unilever.com>, Margaret

Sheppard, Julius Banks, Karen Thundiyil

Follow Up: Normal Priority. 

Hi Pete, Alan, and Andrew,

Its been awhile since we last spoke and I was hoping that we could arrange a conference call sometime

next week (or the week after) to provide an update on where we are with your application. What day

would work for Unilever/Ben and Jerry's? How does next Tuesday (2/24) or Thursday (2/26) look for you

guys?

On another note, I was wondering if you were able to get a shipment of R290? We had postponed our ice

cream cabinet outing since at the time Unilever/ Ben and Jerry's didn't have R290 to show us how a

recovery and recharge of the cabinets would be conducted. If you do have the shipment we would be

interested in trying to set up a field trip again.

Cheers,

Monica

Monica Shimamura

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Stratospheric Protection Division

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW (6205J)

Washington DC 20460

(tel) 202.343.9337

(fax) 202.343.2362

Address for hand delivery (UPS/Fed Ex/etc):

1310 L St. NW, 10th Floor (1027N)

Washington DC 20005

.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o> .· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o> ,.· ́ ̄`·. ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o>

 ̧.· ́ ̄`·..· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o> .· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o>.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o>

.· ́ ̄`·.><((((o> ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o>.· ́ ̄`·.><((((o> ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧><((((o>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 8, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Consumer Specialty Products Association Inc. (“CSPA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Consumer Specialty Products Association Inc., Washington, DC. The nature and scope of CSPA's standards development activities are: consumer-specialty product safety; product description, size and rating; product evaluation test procedures; definitions of terms; labeling and other product information; and recommended levels of performance, among others.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-23512 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.705 Importer obligations. ( a ) *General.* An importer who makes a claim for preferential tariff treatment under § 10.703 of this subpart: ( 1 ) Will be deemed to have certified that the good is eligible for preferential tariff treatment under the US-JFTA:
( 2 ) Is responsible for the truthfulness of the information and data contained in the declaration provided for in § 10.704 of this subpart;
( 3 ) Is responsible for submitting any supporting documents requested by CBP and for the truthfulness of the information contained in those documents. CBP will allow for the direct submission by the exporter or producer of business confidential or other sensitive information, including cost and sourcing information.
( b ) *Information provided by exporter or producer.* The fact that the importer has made a claim for preferential tariff treatment or prepared a declaration based on information provided by an exporter or producer will not relieve the importer of the responsibility referred to in paragraph (a) of this section.
§ 206.433 State responsibilities. ( a ) *Recipient.* The State will be the recipient to which funds are awarded and will be accountable for the use of those funds. There may be subrecipients within the State government.
( b ) *Priorities.* The State will determine priorities for funding. This determination must be made in conformance with § 206.435.
( c ) *Hazard Mitigation Officer.* The State must appoint a Hazard Mitigation Officer who serves as the responsible individual for all matters related to the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
( d ) *Administrative plan.* The State must have an approved administrative plan for the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program in conformance with § 206.437.
[55 FR 35537, Aug. 30, 1990, as amended at 72 FR 61750, Oct. 31, 2007; 86 FR 50677, Sept. 10, 2021]
### §4509. Longevity compensation not applicable to individuals paid by Secretary of Senate; savings provision

Section 4507 of this title on or after October 1, 1983 shall not apply to any individual whose pay is disbursed by the Secretary of the Senate; except that, any individual who prior to such date was entitled to longevity compensation under such section on the basis of service performed prior to such date shall continue to be entitled to such compensation, but no individual shall accrue any longevity compensation on the basis of service performed on or after such date.

(Pub. L. 98–51, title I, §107, July 14, 1983, 97 Stat. 267.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 60j–4 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriation Act, 1984, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1984.
### Summary of Analy tical Results 662 - July

2012

**Sample ID** 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB **Date** 7/2/12 7/9/12 7/16/12 7/23/12 7/30/12 **Top (ft)** 0 0 0 0 0 **Total (T)/ Bottom (ft)**  0 0 0 0 0 **An aly**  **te units** **Diss. (D) Duplicate #**  1 1 1 1 1 PFOA ug/L T 3.38 1.75 1.91 1.42 1.58

ug/L = micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb) ND = not detected (shown as <LOD) NQ = not quantifiable (shown as <LOQ) ND<LOD<NQ<LOQ LOD = limit of detection = 0.0723 ug/L LOQ = limit of quantification = 0.100 ug/L

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 7/23/12. Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample collected on 7/23/12 represents the average of lab duplicate results.

The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid ug/L = micrograms per Liter

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 09000064810fb235.xls:Sheet1 8/30/2012 10:02 AM
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.3008 Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment. ( a ) *General.* If the importer fails to comply with any requirement under this subpart, including submission of a complete certification prepared in accordance with § 10.3004 of this subpart, when requested, the Center director may deny preferential tariff treatment to the imported good.
( b ) *Failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment.* Where the requirements for preferential tariff treatment set forth elsewhere in this subpart are met, the Center director nevertheless may deny preferential tariff treatment to an originating good if the good is shipped through or transshipped in a country other than a Party to the CTPA, and the importer of the good does not provide, at the request of the Center director, evidence demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Center director that the conditions set forth in § 10.3025(a) were met.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-101 August 7, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH NORTHEAST UTILITIES, PUBLIC ON MILLSTONE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of Northeast Utilities on Tuesday, August 12, for the

latest in a series of periodic meetings to discuss plans,

schedules and progress toward restart of the Millstone Units in

Waterford, Ct. Topics include: the status of restart activities,

the Independent Corrective Action Verification Program and the

employee concerns program.

The meeting, which is open to the public for observation,

will begin at 1 p.m., in the Leland F. Sillin Training Center at

the Millstone site.

That evening, the NRC staff will meet with the public to

provide an update on the status of the Millstone recovery

efforts. Little Harbor Consultants, which is overseeing the

employee concerns program at Millstone, will be available to

answer questions from the public.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. in the Waterford Town Hall.

#
Searched for **http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/UserFiles/works/pdfs/ri9657.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/UserFiles/works/pdfs/ri9657.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### Lily Masterson, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. F. A. O. Schwarz Company, Appellant, and Redell, Thompson & Demov, Inc., Impleaded Defendant, Respondent.

No opinion. Present—Glose, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.