alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Ener1, Inc.500 West Cypress Creek
Road-Suite 100 Ft. Lauderdale,
Florida, 33309

November 15, 2004

Securities and Exchange
Commission450  5th Street, NWWashington, DC 20549

Re: Certification Of
Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the
quarter ended September 30, 2004, I, Randall Paulfus, Chief Financial Officer of Ener1,
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1) | such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2004,
           fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of            1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2) | the
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the
quarter ended September 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Ener1, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | BY: /S/ Randall Paulfus
Randall PaulfusChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and AccountingOfficer and Duly Authorized
Officer)
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc.
and will be retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

In accordance with Item 601 of
Regulation S-K, this certification is being furnished as
Exhibit 32.2 to Ener1, Inc.s quarterly report and shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section,
nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of
1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
filing.
:;y^"ORtAIiO N

- ^ ! . O ! ^ 

### SERVE D APRI L8 , 201 0 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATS ^



### OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASfflNGTON , D.C . I N TH EMATTE RO F SKYDIV EKENTUCKY LLC , Respondent. FA A DOCKE T NO . CP09CEOOO 4 (Civi l Penalty Proceeding ) DM S NO . FAA-2009-104 7 ADMINISTRATIV ELA WJUDGE' S ORDE R CHANGIN GDAT EO FHEARIN G Owin g t o aschedulin g conflict , i t ha s becom e necessar y t o chang e th e dat e o f th e hearin g b y on e day . Th e hearin g wil l b e hel do n Jun e 8 , 201 0 rathe r tha n th e Jun e 9 , 201 0 dat e se t fort hi n m y orde r o f Marc h9 , 2010 . I f thi s chang e create s an y visibl e inconvenienc e t o eithe r party , pleas e notif y m e a s soo n a s possible . Th e locatio n o f

th e hearin g remain s Louisville , Kentucky . I T I S S O ORDERED .

Isaa c D . Benki n Administrativ e La w Judg eFA A Docke t No . CP09CE000 4 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g -Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y Alle n K . Gailor , Respondent' s Counse l Th e Gailo r

Law Office , PLL C 100 Professional Art s Buildin g 73 0 Wes t Marke t Stree t Louisville , Kentucky 4020 2 TEL : 502-584-721 7 FAX : 502-584-484 8 Taneesh aD . Marshall , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , Southern Regio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 2063 6 Atlant aGA 3032 0 TEL : 404-305-520 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D . Benkin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New ^ Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorne y 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Federa

l Aviation Administration , 600 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 , Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DANIELLE ANN LOZANO,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-14-00208-CR

Appeal from the

291st District Court

of Dallas, Texas 

(TC# F-0934252-U)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief 

until February 17, 2015. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Nanette Hendrickson, the Appellant’s Attorney, 

prepare the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before February 17, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of January, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
Wyoming Sulfate Contribution to Badlands

Worst

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total

BADL1 2002 plan02c36k PS4 23 WY 0.0844044 0.0002478 0.0056609 0.0012652 0.0106739 0.1022522

Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Worst) to Sulfate at Badlands = 0.1 divided by 1.8, or 6%

Best

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total

BADL1 2002 plan02c36k PS4 23 WY 0.1041739 8.26E-05 0.0079478 5.22E-05 0.0095087 0.1217652

Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Best) to Sulfate at Badlands = 0.12 divided by 0.6, or 20%
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-139 September 14, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE REVISES AGENDA

FOR MEETING IN LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, SEPTEMBER 19 - 20

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) has

revised the agenda for its meeting on September 19 - 20 in Las Vegas, Nevada, to discuss issues

relating to a proposed high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in Ballroom C of the Crowne Plaza

Hotel, at 4255 South Paradise Road, starting at 8 a.m. each day.

On the opening day, the committee will consider proposed topics for consideration by the full

committee and working groups, meet with the NRC staff to discuss progress on key technical issues,

and then hear comments from stakeholders. Among the groups that have indicated their intent to

provide comments are the State of Nevada, local counties, Native American tribes and the Nevada

Nuclear Waste Task Force. The committee also will discuss issues for its 2001 Action Plan, in

addition to miscellaneous items.

The agenda for September 20 remains unchanged. The committee will discuss progress at the

Yucca Mountain site with Department of Energy (DOE) officials, as well as the DOE Site

Recommendation report and total system performance assessment. It also will hear from federal and

state officials, along with members of the academic community. The committee will finalize topics

and presentations for its next public meeting with the Commission, tentatively scheduled for October

17.

Those who wish to make oral or written statements, or seek additional information on the

meeting or changes to the agenda should contact Howard Larson, at 301-415-6805.

A detailed agenda and other aspects of the meeting will be described in an upcoming edition of

the Federal Register. ACNW meeting notices, transcripts and letters are available, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW/ on the internet.

###
CERTIFICATION OF CEO
               PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diasense, Inc., (the "Company"),
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony Paterra,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
       presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
       and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Anthony Paterra
                                        Anthony Paterra, CEO

                                        May 13, 2005
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-160 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, October 27, 1997)

NRC TO HOLD CONFERENCE WITH WESTINGHOUSE

TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT SOUTH CAROLINA FACILITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of

Westinghouse Electric Corporation Wednesday for a predecisional enforcement

conference on apparent violations of NRC regulations at the company’s Commercial

Nuclear Fuel Division facility in Columbia, South Carolina. The facility makes fuel rods

for commercial nuclear power plants.

The meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. in Room T-08A1 of the NRC’s Two White

Flint North Building, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. It is open to

observation by the public.

The seven apparent violations to be discussed involve controls to prevent an

inadvertent criticality, or nuclear chain reaction, at the facility. They were identified as a

result of an NRC criticality safety inspection on August 25 to 29. The inspection was

conducted to review Westinghouse’s root cause analysis and implementation of

corrective actions following a June 23 loss of volume control for a hopper that holds

uranium powder before it is processed to make ceramic fuel pellets. The inspection

also reviewed Westinghouse’s actions associated with an August 25 loss of volume

control for moisture dropout tanks connected with the fuel manufacturing process.

The apparent violations include inadequate investigations of the June 23 and

August 25 events, including failure to identify root causes and take timely corrective

actions; failure to conduct adequate criticality safety evaluations for the hopper and

moisture dropout tanks; failure to verify that installed safety controls match design

documents; failure to update criticality safety evaluations to ensure that all

assumptions, including credible upset conditions, are justified, documented and

independently reviewed; failure to control and maintain criticality safety records; failure

to make required timely notifications to the NRC operations center in connection with

the June 23 and August 25 events; and failure to develop nuclear criticality safety

procedures to implement NRC regulations and license conditions.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean the NRC has
determined that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken.

Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety

significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out any errors that may

have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable the company to outline its

proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action,

such as a fine, will be made at this conference. Those decisions will be made by senior

NRC officials at a later date.

###
§ 19.225 Educational institutions eligible to submit transition plans. ( a ) *Application.* This section applies to each educational institution to which §§ 19.300 through 19.310 apply that: ( 1 ) Admitted students of only one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1972; or
( 2 ) Admitted students of only one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1965, but thereafter admitted, as regular students, students of the sex not admitted prior to June 23, 1965.
( b ) *Provision for transition plans.* An educational institution to which this section applies shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 19.300 through 19.310.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7778

PHILIP HARRY MARSHNER, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JON P. GALLEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE

OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.

(1:06-cv-00254-RDB)

Submitted: April 4, 2007 Decided: April 17, 2007

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Philip Harry Marshner, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Philip Harry Marshner, Jr. seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as

untimely. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Marshner has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-81162-CV-SMITH

HOWARD COHAN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

FIRST COAST ENERGY, L.L.P., 

a Florida Limited Liability Partnership,

d/b/a Shell

Defendant(s).

____________________________________/

ORDER APPROVING AND ENTERING CONSENT DECREE

AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

This matter is before the Court upon the Joint Motion for Approval and Entry of Consent 

Decree and to Dismiss Action with Prejudice [DE 27]. The Court has reviewed the Joint Motion 

and the Consent Decree attached to the Joint Motion as Exhibit “A,” and the record. Upon 

consideration, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Court finds the Consent Decree to be fair, adequate and reasonable to improve 

and provide access for persons with disabilities at the property at issue, and to otherwise meet the 

purposes of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181, et seq.

2. The Joint Motion for Approval and Entry of Consent Decree and to Dismiss Action 

with Prejudice [DE 27] is GRANTED.

3. The Court APPROVES and ADOPTS the Consent Decree, and pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54, the Consent Decree is ENTERED and this action is 

Case 9:20-cv-81162-RS Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/28/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

4. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the Consent Decree until April 4, 

2022.

5. Each party shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs except as detailed in the 

Consent Decree. 

6. To the extent not otherwise disposed of herein, all pending motions are hereby 

DENIED as moot, and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this action.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 28th day of May, 2021.

Copies furnished to:

All counsel of record

Case 9:20-cv-81162-RS Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/28/2021 Page 2 of 2
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 99-28 June 28, 1999

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

OFFICE: 817-860-8128

PAGER: 888-876-2331

E-Mail: bwh@nrc.gov

RUSSELL L. BYWATER, JR. ASSIGNED

SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT ARKANSAS NUCLEAR

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has assigned Russell L. Bywater, Jr. as

senior resident inspector for Arkansas Nuclear One, a two-reactor nuclear power plant near

Russellville, Arkansas. Mr. Bywater assumed his duties on June 1.

Mr. Bywater graduated from Nebraska Wesleyan University in 1987 with a B.S. degree

in physics and mathematics, and from Iowa State University with an M.S. in nuclear engineering

in 1989. He conducted research in nuclear engineering at the University of Tennessee, Iowa

State University, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Argonne National Laboratory prior to

joining the NRC in 1990.

With the NRC, Mr. Bywater has served as a reactor engineer, a licensing project

manager, reactor inspector, and for 4 1⁄2 years as resident inspector at Prairie Island Nuclear

Generating Station in Red Wing, Minnesota. His most recent assignment has been as a reactor

inspector in NRC’s Region IV offices in Arlington, Texas. He is a licensed professional engineer

in the state of Minnesota.

Mr. Bywater will reside in Russellville with his wife, Yvonne.

###
No: 24-001 January 8, 2024 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Seeks Input, Offers Hearing Opportunity on North Anna 

Subsequent License Renewal Draft Environmental Impact Statement 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on its draft site-specific 

environmental impact statement – called an EIS – for the proposed second renewal of the

licenses for the North Anna nuclear power plant in Virginia. The NRC is also providing an 

opportunity for the public to request a hearing based on new information in the draft EIS. 

The agency’s draft EIS examined the supplemental environmental report submitted by

Virginia Electric and Power Company (Dominion). The staff’s preliminary conclusion is there 

are no adverse environmental impacts that would preclude the renewal of North Anna’s 

operating licenses for another 20 years. 

Dominion is seeking a second, or subsequent, licensing term to extend the plant’s 

operations from 60 to 80 years. The licenses for the North Anna reactors, located 40 miles 

northwest of Richmond, Virginia, currently will expire in April 2038 for Unit 1, and in August 

2040 for Unit 2. 

The draft EIS is open for comments through Feb. 22. Interested parties have until 

March 8 to request a hearing; details on how to file a request are included in the Federal Register

notice published today. 

The NRC staff will hold two public meetings on the draft EIS, a webinar on Jan. 30 and 

an in-person meeting near the plant site. Details on the meetings will be published in the near 

future.

Written comments can be submitted by email at NorthAnnaEnvironmental@nrc.gov, or 

electronically at regulations.gov, using Docket ID “NRC-2020-0234.” Comments can also be 

submitted by mail to Office of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Program Management, 

Announcements and Editing Staff. 

A copy of Dominion’s subsequent license renewal environmental report supplement is 

available for public review at the Louisa County Library, 881 Davis Highway in Mineral, 

Virginia. Information about the North Anna subsequent license renewal review is available on 

the NRC website.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-041 April 25, 2000

NOTE TO EDITORS: ACRS MEETING RESCHEDULED

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has

rescheduled a Rockville, Maryland, meeting of its subcommittee on thermal-hydraulic phenomena.

The meeting will now be held on March 15, in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North

building at 11545 Rockville Pike, beginning at 8:30 a.m.

All other information regarding the meeting, which was previously scheduled for two days,

March 14 - 15, remains unchanged from the previous announcement. For further information,

interested individuals should contact Paul Boehnert, at 301-415-8065.

####
### SUBCHAPTER V—CAPITOL-FLOWN FLAGS FOR FAMILIES OF FALLEN HEROES
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

John Wesley Carter, Appellant

No. 06-18-00124-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 159th District Court of 

Angelina County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2017-

0242). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, John Wesley Carter, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 7, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A1091. JOHNSON v. RYALL.

Upon consideration of the Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw Appeal in the

above styled case, pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 41 (g), it is ordered that the

motion is hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon

receipt of this order.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

September 30, 2024

09/30/2024