alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 1:20-cv-23178-WPD Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/31/2020 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:20-cv-23178-WPD Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/31/2020 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.882 Goods eligible for tariff preference claims.

Cotton or man-made fiber apparel goods provided for in Chapters 61 or 62 of the HTSUS that are cut or knit to shape, or both, and sewn or otherwise assembled in the territory of Oman from fabric or yarn produced or obtained outside the territory of Oman or the United States are eligible for a TPL claim filed under § 10.881 of this subpart (subject to the quantitative limitations set forth in U.S. Note 13, Subchapter XVI, Chapter 99, HTSUS).
### §5541. Fees for internal delivery in House of Representatives of nonpostage mail from outside sources

Effective with respect to fiscal years beginning with fiscal year 1995, in the case of mail from outside sources presented to the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives (other than mail through the Postal Service and mail with postage otherwise paid) for internal delivery in the House of Representatives, the Chief Administrative Officer is authorized to collect fees equal to the applicable postage. Amounts received by the Chief Administrative Officer as fees under the preceding sentence shall be deposited in the Treasury for credit to the account of the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer.

(Pub. L. 104–53, title I, §101, Nov. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 520; Pub. L. 110–161, div. H, title I, §103(a), Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2225.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 117j of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriations Act, 1996, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1996.

#### Amendments

2007—Pub. L. 110–161 substituted "deposited in the Treasury for credit to the account of the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer" for "deposited in the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2007 Amendment

Pub. L. 110–161, div. H, title I, §103(b), Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2225, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2008 and each succeeding fiscal year."
#### § 115.52 Approval.

The Certifying Authority shall issue a certificate of approval, valid for 2 years, to each road vehicle that complies with the applicable requirements in § 115.51.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1361

IRVIN SEBREE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

R. DEAN KENDERDINE, Director, Maryland State Retirement

Pension System,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.

(1:07-cv-01674-BEL)

Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: September 26, 2008

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Irvin Sebree, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Marshall Sullivan, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
1

The record indicates the Appellee’s last name is spelled

“Kenderdine,” which is how we have spelled the name on the caption.

2

Sebree does not challenge the district court’s dismissal

without prejudice of his state law claims. Accordingly, we will

not review the court’s decision in this regard. See 4th Cir. R.

34(b).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Irvin Sebree appeals the district court order granting

the Appellee’s motion to dismiss and dismissing his civil rights

case. We have reviewed the record and affirm for the reasons cited

by the district court. Sebree v. Kenderine, No. 1:07-cv-01674-BEL

(D. Md. Mar. 19, 2008).1

 We affirm the district court order.2 We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

 AFFIRMED
#### Hassan Abdirahman MAHUMUD, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Respondent.

No. 01-70191.

I & NS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 6, 2002.

Decided May 14, 2002.

Before RYMER, McKEOWN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Hassan Abdirahman Mahumud, a citizen of Somalia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of Mahumud’s requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We grant Mahumud’s petition for review and reverse the BIA’s denial of Mahumud’s request for asylum.

The BIA’s ruling that Mahumud did not demonstrate reasonable fear he would be persecuted because of his membership in a minority clan is not supported by substantial evidence. *See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d *38 (1992).*Among other evidence, Mahumud in his testimony, deemed credible by the BIA, made clear that several family members in multiple incidents were persecuted, attacked and killed because of tribal membership and not merely based on general civil strife. Based on our review of the record, including Mahumud’s credible testimony and the relevant State Department reports, “a reasonable factfinder would have to conclude that the requisite fear of persecution existed” and Mahumud is eligible for asylum. *See id.*

In addition to establishing his eligibility for a discretionary grant of asylum, Mahumud’s credible testimony establishes that it is more likely than not that he will be persecuted on account of his membership in a minority clan if he returns to Somalia. As such, he must also be granted withholding of removal. *Chen v. INS,*266 F.3d 1094, 1099, 1103 (9th Cir.2001).

We grant Mahumud’s petition for review and reverse the BIA’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal.1

PETITION GRANTED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Because we grant the petition and reverse on these grounds, we need not reach the merits of Mahumud’s other arguments on appeal.

RYMER, Circuit Judge,

dissenting.

Because I read the record differently, I do not believe that a reasonable factfinder would be compelled to conclude that the *504attacks on Mahumud’s family were on account of sub-clan tribal membership.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-110 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, July 2, 1998)

NRC ISSUES LICENSE FOR SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION

AT NORTH ANNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a license to Virginia Electric and

Power Company to store spent fuel from its North Anna nuclear power plant in an

independent spent fuel storage installation at the plant site near Mineral, Virginia.

The spent fuel, which is presently stored in a water pool at the site, will be placed

in dry casks on concrete storage pads. The pads will be surrounded by both a security

fence and a perimeter fence.

The facility will provide storage for up to 839.04 metric tons of uranium contained

in approximately 1824 fuel assemblies. Up to 32 assemblies can be loaded into each

cask. Virginia Power plans to use the model TN-32 cask, designed by Transnuclear,

Inc. The license permits storage for an initial term of 20 years, with the possibility of

renewal.

The dry casks, in combination with the existing fuel pool, will provide the capacity

to store all spent fuel expected to be generated by North Anna Units 1 and 2 during

their currently licensed operating lives, ending on April 1, 2018, and August 21, 2020,

respectively.

Virginia Power filed its application for the license in May 1995. NRC published a

notice announcing receipt of the application on July 6, 1995, and offered an opportunity

for a public hearing. No requests for a hearing were received.

Before issuing the license, the NRC staff conducted an environmental

assessment , which found no significant impact, and a safety review, which found that

no radioactive materials would be released from the casks under any credible accident

conditions. Copies of the environmental assessment, safety evaluation report and

other related documents are available for review at the NRC’s Local Public Document

Room located in the Alderman Library, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia,

22903-2498, and at the NRC Public Document Room located at 2120 L Street, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20555.

###
Exhibit 99.2
                                                                    ------------

                  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In  connection  with the  annual  report  of  MedSolutions,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2002,  as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  Sam
Hicks, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



                                                     /s/  SAM HICKS
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Sam Hicks
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     Date:  April 15, 2003
No: III-23-020 August 4, 2023 

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662 

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663 

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at Clinton Nuclear Power Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Jeffery T. Steward as the 

new NRC senior resident inspector at the Clinton nuclear power plant in Clinton, 

Illinois. The plant is operated by Constellation Energy Company. 

Steward joined the NRC in 2016 as a reactor engineer in NRC’s Region III 

office. Most recently, Steward was a senior resident inspector at the Browns Ferry 

Nuclear Plant. He also has served as acting senior resident inspector at the Nine Mile 

Point Nuclear Station and resident inspector at the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant.

“Jeffery came to the NRC with a wealth of experience. His extensive 

knowledge and expertise in the nuclear field, coupled with his ability to carry out the 

agency’s safety mission, make him a great addition to the resident inspector office at Clinton,” said Region 

III Administrator Jack Giessner.

Prior to joining the agency, Steward was an energy industry analyst at the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission and an NRC-licensed operator and certified license training instructor at the Perry nuclear plant 

in Ohio. 

He began his career as a nuclear-trained submarine electrical operator in the U.S. Navy and 

continued to serve as a reservist in various units and assignments until 2009, retiring with 31 years of service. 

Steward earned a bachelor’s degree in nuclear engineering technology from Thomas Edison State 

University and a master’s degree in management from Troy University. 

Steward joins resident inspector Arsalan Muneeruddin at Clinton. Each commercial nuclear power 

plant site in the United States has at least two resident inspectors who monitor day-to-day operations at the 

plant. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring significant 

projects, and interacting with plant workers and the public.
### SUBCHAPTER II—EMPLOYEES, EXPENSES, AND ALLOWANCES
Second Department,

April, 1915.

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James H. Johnson, Relator, *v.*Maurice E. Connolly, as President of the Borough of Queens, City of New York, Respondent.

*Civil service —receiving political contributions — public officer—duty toward subordinates—removal*— *certiorari.*

• Certiorari issued out of the Supreme Court and attested on the 18th day of December, 1912, to review respóndenos determination, as borough president, in removing relator from thfe position of chief engineer of the bureau of sewers.

Putnam, J.:

The uncontradicted testimony showed that relator’s conduct in receiving political contributions in the bureau of sewers was against the Civil Service Law (§ 26),* and violated the corresponding provisions of the Penal Law (§ 774). Although the relator did not solicit contributions, and gave no intimation that failure to pay might affect the employee’s future position, the law is against payments, even unsought, if made and taken in a State or municipal office, especially if paid to an official superior. The influence of such position is not less effective if *920silently exerted. The limits by these statutes to contributions asked, or payments made within the building or room of the city or State, are presumably due to what were deemed the reasonable and constitutional freedom of citizens when in private Ufe. The Legislature of New York, following various Federal statutes, aimed to cheek a political abuse in taking party tribute from officers when within their office surroundings. In such official relations the call and pressure to pay for political purposes are felt without express demand or any open threats. Our statutes, therefore, would keep such contributions purely voluntary, as from citizens in private life, which character they cannot have if paid over at official desks in city bureaus. The determination of the president of the borough of Queens, removing the relator is, therefore, confirmed and the writ dismissed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred. Determination confirmed and writ dismissed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements.

*

 Consol. Laws, chap. 7 (Laws of 1909. chap. 15), § 26.—[Rep.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.825 Issuance of negative origin determinations. If, as a result of an origin verification initiated under this subpart, CBP determines that a claim for preferential tariff treatment made under § 10.803 of this subpart should be denied, it will issue a determination in writing or via an authorized electronic data interchange system to the importer that sets forth the following: ( a ) A description of the good that was the subject of the verification together with the identifying numbers and dates of the export and import documents pertaining to the good;
( b ) A statement setting forth the findings of fact made in connection with the verification and upon which the determination is based; and
( c ) With specific reference to the rules applicable to originating goods as set forth in General Note 30, HTSUS, and in §§ 10.809 through 10.817 of this subpart, the legal basis for the determination.
#### § 123.12 Are books and records required?

You must retain complete records of all transactions financed with your SBA loan proceeds, including copies of all contracts and receipts, for a period of 3 years after you receive your final disbursement of loan proceeds. If you have a physical disaster business or economic injury loan, you must also maintain current and accurate books of account, including financial and operating statements, insurance policies, and tax returns. You must retain applicable books and records for 3 years after your loan matures including any extensions, or from the date when your loan is paid in full, whichever occurs first. You must make available to SBA or other authorized government personnel upon request all such books and records for inspection, audit, and reproduction during normal business hours and you must also permit SBA and any participating financial institution to inspect and appraise your assets. (OMB Approval No. 3245-0110.)
Exhibit
32(b)





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rocky Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
E. McDonald, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ James E. McDonaldJames
      E. McDonald, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      OfficerOctober
      28, 2010
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-14 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### Harold Goldberg, Respondent, v. Sol Greenbaum, Appellant.

Present —Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
```

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

Ener1, Inc.
550 West Cypress Creek Road, Suite 120
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309

November 14, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

Re: Certification Of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, I, Kevin P.
Fitzgerald, Chief Executive Officer of Ener1, Inc., hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the
quarter ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Ener1, Inc.

 By:   /s/Kevin P. Fitzgerald
         Kevin P. Fitzgerald Chief Executive Officer (Principal
         Executive Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc.
and will be retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

In accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-B, this certification is
being "furnished" as Exhibit 32.1 to Ener1, Inc.'s quarterly report and
shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange
Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
```