alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This certification accompanies this periodic report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Warwick Community Bancorp, Inc.
(the "Registrant") that the Annual Report of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and the results of operations as of the dates and for the
periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.

|Date:   March 15, 2004 | /s/ Fred G. KowalFred G.
Kowal

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                   
|---------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:   March 15, 2004 | /s/ Arthur W. BudichArthur W. Budich

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.589 Certification for goods exported to a Party. ( a ) *Submission of certification to CBP.* Any person who completes and issues a certification for a good exported from the United States to a Party must provide a copy of the certification (or such other medium or format approved by the Party's customs authority for that purpose) to CBP upon request.
( b ) *Notification of errors in certification.* Any person who completes and issues a certification for a good exported from the United States to a Party and who has reason to believe that the certification contains or is based on incorrect information must promptly notify every person to whom the certification was provided of any change that could affect the accuracy or validity of the certification. Notification of an incorrect certification must also be given either in writing or via an authorized electronic data interchange system to CBP specifying the correction (*see* §§ 10.622 and 10.623 of this subpart).
( c ) *Maintenance of records* — ( 1 ) *General.* Any person who completes and issues a certification for a good exported from the United States to a Party must maintain, for a period of at least five years after the date the certification was signed, all records and supporting documents relating to the origin of a good for which the certification was issued, including the certification or copies thereof and records and documents associated with: ( i ) The purchase, cost, and value of, and payment for, the good;
( ii ) The purchase, cost, and value of, and payment for, all materials, including indirect materials, used in the production of the good; and
( iii ) The production of the good in the form in which the good was exported.
( 2 ) *Method of maintenance.* The records referred to in paragraph (c) of this section must be maintained as provided in § 163.5 of this chapter.
( 3 ) *Availability of records.* For purposes of determining compliance with the provisions of this part, the records required to be maintained under this section must be stored and made available for examination and inspection by the Center director or other appropriate CBP officer in the same manner as provided in part 163 of this chapter.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00005-CV

Philip Robert Terranella, Appellant

v.

Chaoyueh Kent, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-06-002760, HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Philip Robert Terranella and appellee Chaoyueh Kent have filed an agreed

motion to dismiss the appeal. The parties have agreed that costs are to be paid by the party incurring

same. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.

 

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Henson

Dismissed on Agreed Motion

Filed: May 3, 2007
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-091 June 14, 2000

NRC RESEARCH EMPLOYEES

RECOGNIZED FOR OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING EXPERTISE

Four Office of Regulatory Research employees at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

have won awards in recognition of their significant technical expertise and career accomplishments.

Two of the employees, Dr. James Costello of the Engineering Research Applications Branch

and Dr. Joe Muscara of the Materials Engineering Branch, recently were presented with “Best

Technical Paper Awards” at the Eighth International Conference On Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-8)

in Baltimore, Md.

The industry group cited Dr. Costello for his technical paper, “Predictability of Steel

Containment Response Near Failure.” Dr. Muscara was honored for his work on the effects of light

water coolant environments on fatigue crack initiation in piping and pressure vessel steels. The

conference was sponsored by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, the Japan Society of

Mechanical Engineers and the Societe Francaise de’Energie Nucleaire.

In addition, Dr. Harold Ornstein of the agency’s Regulatory Effectiveness Assessment and

Human Factors Branch received the City College of New York Engineering School Alumni

Association’s annual “Career Achievement Award.” The honor is presented to a graduate of the school

“whose career and achievements are a source of pride to Alma Mater and to his/her fellow alumni.”

Dr. Ornstein, who accepted the award at a recent ceremony in New York City, has been employed by

the NRC for 25 years.

Also, Steven Arndt of the Safety Margins and Systems Analysis Branch was named a Fellow of

The Ohio Academy of Science, a honor bestowed upon individuals who have made extensive,

productive, scientific, technological or educational contributions to society.

“We are delighted and proud of the major contributions of our colleagues,” said Ashok

Thadani, Director of the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. “We welcome the welldeserved recognition of their hard work, technical expertise and career accomplishments by these

prestigious outside organizations, and share in the celebration of their efforts.”

###
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-105 December 3, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT AT KEWAUNEE PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois,

have announced the assignment of Julio Lara as the agency’s

Senior Resident Inspector at the Kewaunee nuclear power plant in

Kewaunee, Wisconsin.

Lara joined the NRC in 1988 as a reactor engineer at the

Region I Office in Pennsylvania. In 1991, he transferred to

Region II in Georgia to become a resident inspector at the Watts

Bar plant in Tennessee. Most recently, he had been a resident

inspector at the Monticello plant in Minnesota. He received a

bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from the University

of Houston. He is a licensed professional engineer. Lara and

his wife and daughter reside in the Green Bay, Wisconsin, area.

Lara can be reached at 920-388-3156.

#
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-167 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, September 15, 1998)

NRC DIRECTS EXPEDITED ACTION BY LICENSING BOARD

CONSIDERING HEARING ON OCONEE LICENSE RENEWAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has directed its Atomic Safety and

Licensing Board Panel to adopt an expedited schedule for considering a request for a

hearing on the proposed license renewal of the Oconee nuclear power plant 30 miles

west of Greenville, S.C.

If a hearing is granted, the Commission has ordered that the Licensing Board set

a schedule for conducting it so that a Commission decision can be issued in about two

and a half years. This is the second such case-specific order the Commission has

issued under its new policy statement on licensing proceedings. The first, issued

August 19, concerned a license renewal hearing request for the Calvert Cliffs plant in

Maryland.

In its order today, the Commission also has called for the Licensing Board to

decide within 90 days whether a petition for hearing on the Oconee license renewal

now pending will be granted. It sets milestones that provide for an abbreviated

discovery schedule, and for shorter response times for filings and for pleadings than

has been the case heretofore. The Licensing Board must notify the Commission in

writing if any single milestone could be missed by more than 30 days, explaining why,

and outlining measures being taken to get the proceeding back on schedule.

The Commission believes the schedule it has directed is achievable under

current NRC rules of practice, the provisions of its order, and the NRC staff’s schedule

for reviewing the application. At the same time, the Commission order says: “We do not

expect the Licensing Board to sacrifice fairness and sound decision-making to expedite

any hearing granted on this application.”

The milestones set out in today’s Commission order are to be followed in ruling

on the petition for a hearing already filed in the Oconee case.

Duke Energy Co. filed its application on July 6 for a 20-year extension of the

operating licenses for Oconee Units 1, 2 and 3. The application is now under review by

the NRC staff.
###

EDITORS: The text of the Commission order will be posted on the NRC Internet web

page at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports/renewal.htm
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 24, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants ; Docket Id: OAR

– 2013
- 0602 FROM: Region 7 , EPA SUBJECT: July 3 1, 2014 , Meeting Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing

Power Plants
**SUMMARY** Karl Brooks and Michael Jay of EPA gave a summary presentation on July 31 , 2014 , during the Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry Annual Environmental and Energy Conference
. The majority of the presentation centered on highlighting the four major building blocks in the Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2 , 2014
. **ATTENDEES** EPA Region 7: Karl Brooks Michael Jay Othe r Attendees included members of Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry

- attendee list not available.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 77

**Question 77:** Representatives of the nuclear power industry are concerned that the additional terms provided in the revised rule to describe the "real estate" in and around commercial power plants seems to be overlapping. This could lead to confusion. Access to these various areas may also affect the category to which individuals working within these areas are assigned. At nuclear power plants, either the "protected area" or "radiation controlled area" may serve as the "restricted area." Although workers granted unescorted access entering the "protected area" may not be directly monitored for radiation exposure, they must be considered as "occupationally exposed." At least minimal "radiation worker" training is required for these workers consistent with the regulations. "Controlled areas" would typically extend to the "site boundary" or "owner controlled area." Does the NRC staff have any comments on this matter?

**Answer:** Each licensee should carefully document how the licensees local "area" terms correspond to the area terms in 10 CFR Part 20 (restricted, controlled, and unrestricted areas). Under both old and revised Part 20, anyone who enters a restricted area is subject to the occupational dose limits and must receive appropriate instructions in accordance with 10 CFR 19.12. Workers can also be occupationally exposed (and, therefore, subject to the occupational dose limits) in controlled and unrestricted areas (i.e., areas outside restricted areas) depending (in accordance with the definition of "occupational dose") on the nature of the work they are doing and regardless of the area they are in outside a "restricted area."

(References: 10 CFR 20.1003, 10 CFR 20.1201).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, December 13, 2017
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-27 May 30, 2000

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETINGS IN ALABAMA JUNE 8 ON CHANGES IN

REACTOR OVERSIGHT AND LATEST ASSESSMENT OF FARLEY PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled two public meetings for Thursday, June 8

-- one on the latest performance review results for Southern Nuclear Operating Company’s Farley

Nuclear Plant in Alabama, and the other meeting on the NRC's reactor oversight process.

The first meeting will be held at 2 p.m. CDT at the Farley plant visitors center auditorium on

Highway 95 near Columbia, Alabama. NRC staff members will discuss Farley’s latest plant

performance review results, and will be available after the meeting to answer any questions from media

or members of the public.

The Plant Performance Reviews are used to evaluate safety performance information and

identify any changes in plant performance so the NRC can allocate inspection resources appropriately.

The text of each PPR letter, including the one on Farley, is available from the NRC Office of Public

Affairs and has been posted on the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

Current performance information for the two units at Farley is available on the NRC web site

at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/FAR1/far1_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/FAR2/far2_chart.html.

The second meeting will begin at 7 p.m. CDT in the Houston County Administration Building

in Dothan. NRC officials will describe the new oversight process which began at the Farley plant in

April. Members of the public will have the opportunity to ask questions during the meeting.

The new oversight process uses more objective, timely, and safety-significant criteria in

assessing performance, while seeking to more effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. Under

the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based personnel are

supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators. These

performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant operations, including the viability of

redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection, and security measures.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC's web site every three months. The safety significance of each inspection finding or performance

indicator is characterized by a color -- green, white, yellow, or red.
The NRC response to the inspection findings and performance indicators will be based on the

significance of the items. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow, or red

assessments receive increasing NRC involvement. Multiple red findings could result in a plant

shutdown.

A plain language summary of the reactor oversight process is available from the NRC Office of

Public Affairs or on the web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

##
Technical Contacts
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No.: 9:20-CV-81205 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, 

 INC. d/b/a/ PAR FUNDING, 

LISA MCELHONE, et al., 

Defendants, and 

L.M.E. 2017 FAMILY TRUST, 

Relief Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

DEFENDANT LISA MCELHONE’S AND RELIEF DEFENDANT L.M.E. 2017 FAMILY 

TRUST’S NOTICE OF JOINDER IN DEFENDANT DEAN VAGNOZZI’S BRIEF ON 

CURRENT SCOPE OF RECEIVERSHIP AND ASSET FREEZE ISSUES (D.E. 82) 

Defendant Lisa McElhone and Relief Defendant L.M.E. 2017 Family Trust, by and 

through undersigned counsel, file this Notice of Joinder in Defendant Dean Vagnozzi’s Brief on 

Current Scope of Receivership and Asset Freeze Issues (D.E. 82) as the same general factual, 

statutory, and legal arguments presented in said Brief apply to them. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Law Offices of Alan S. Futerfas 

Attorneys for Lisa McElhone 

565 Fifth Avenue, 7th Floor 

New York, New York 10017 

(212) 684-8400 

asfuterfas@futerfaslaw.com

By: /s/Alan S. Futerfas 

 ALAN S. FUTERFAS 

GRAYROBINSON, P.A. 

Attorneys for L.M.E. 2017 Family Trust 

333 S.E. 2d Avenue, Suite 3200 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone #: (305) 416-6880 

Facsimile #: (305) 416-6887 

joel.hirschhorn@gray-robinson.com

By: s/Joel Hirschhorn 

 JOEL HIRSCHHORN 

 Florida Bar #104573 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 91 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2020 Page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that, on August 4, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of electronic filing 

to all counsel of record. 

s/Joel Hirschhorn 

JOEL HIRSCHHORN 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 91 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2020 Page 2 of 2
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-84 July 14, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

RADIOACTIVE SOURCE RECOVERED AT DELAWARE JOB SITE

A radioactive source that had been lost at a construction

site in Claymont, De., has been found. The source is now in a

shielded container, and will be sent to the manufacturer for

disposal.

Ambric Engineering notified the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission on Friday, July 11, that a piece of the source rod

from a portable moisture-density gauge had apparently broken off

during work at the Ballymeade development on Delaware state route

92 on June 25. Following that work, Ambric Engineering sent the

gauge to its manufacturer for maintenance. On July 10, the

manufacturer notified Ambric that the source rod was missing from

the gauge.

The NRC staff will continue to review licensee actions

concerning the loss of the sealed source.

#
#### §§ 206.49-206.60 [Reserved]
Schedule / Annexe

    Members of the board of directors / Membres du conseil d’administration

    

    

    	 	 	
            Resident Canadian

            Résident Canadien

             

             

          
	
            Deborah Close

          	
            2030 29th Avenue Southwest, Calgary AB

            T2T 1N3, Canada

             

              

          	
            Yes / Oui

          
	
            Edward J. Ryan

          	
            375 Crestview Drive Fort, Washington PA

            19034, United States

             

              

          	
            No / Non

          
	
            Dennis R. Maple

          	
            801 Forest Lane, Malvern PA

            19355, United States

             

              

          	
            No / Non

          
	
            Christian E. Muntwyler

          	
            Schlyffistrasse 17, Baech 8806

            Switzerland

             

              

          	
            No / Non

          
	
            Eric Demirian

          	
            336 Spadina Road, Suite 301, Toronto ON

            M5R 2V8, Canada

             

              

          	
            Yes / Oui

          
	
            Jane O'Hagan

          	
            2123 30th Avenue Southwest, Calgary AB

            T2T 1R6, Canada

             

              

          	
            Yes / Oui

          
	
            John J. Walker

          	
            459 Mystic Court, Wyckoff, Bergen County

            NJ

            07481, United States

             

              

          	
            No / Non

          
	
            Deepak Chopra

          	
            65 Truman Road, Toronto ON

            M2L 2L7, Canada

          	
            Yes / Oui
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO. 20-cv-10089-JLK 

JOHN GARVEY, an individual, and all

others similarly situated pursuant to 

29 U.S.C. §216(b),

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,

Defendant. 

___________________________________/

FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE, comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary

Dismissal without Prejudice (D.E. #6) filed August 21, 2020 in the above styled case. 

Accordingly, after a careful review of the record and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

41(a)(1)(A)(i), it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED as follows:

1. The above-styled case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

2. All unresolved pending motions in this case are hereby DENIED as moot.

3. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case. 

Case 4:20-cv-10089-JLK Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2020 Page 1 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at the James Lawrence King Federal Justice 

Building and United States Courthouse, Miami, Florida, this 24 day of August, 2020. th

 

JAMES LAWRENCE KING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: All Counsel of Record

Case 4:20-cv-10089-JLK Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §125. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 125 was editorially reclassified as section 4553 of this title.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JANINE RHODES,

Appellant,

v.

DANIEL C. RHODES,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3220

[November 21, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Andrea Gundersen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-6772 

FMCE (41).

Michelle R. Walsh of the Law Offices of Michelle Walsh, P.A., Miami, 

for appellant.

Mark A. Levy, Kenneth A. Gordon, and Brent V. Trapana of Brinkley 

Morgan, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.