alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01560**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 01560\01560_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 01560\01560_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 01560\01560_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 01560\01560_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01560\01560_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01560\01560_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 01560\Certification Statement_01560.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01560\Supporting Documentation\01560_A5-2 Aerial Map- Plant ID No. 1560_CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01560\Supporting Documentation\01560_A5-3 Water Balance Plant ID No.1560_CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01560\Supporting Documentation\01560_EPA Letter Request_EPA Plant ID No 1560.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 4.1





 


Share
Certificate


 





	Number of certificate

                                              
	 	Number
of shares
	 	 	 






 


Chanson International Holding


 


COMPANY
NUMBER [NUMBER]


 


This is to certify that [Name] of
[Address] is the registered holder of [Number] Class A ordinary shares of [Value] each being [partly paid to the extent of [amount in
words][amount in numerals] per share]]/[fully paid][and numbered [number]] in the above-named company, subject to the memorandum and articles
of association of the company.


 





[Transfer date]


 





	 	 	 
	Director	 	Director/ Secretary
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Helen Swartz, Plaintiff,

v.

Swamiji Management Incorporated, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-22895-Civ-Scola

Order of Dismissal

The parties have dismissed this case with prejudice in accordance with

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Joint Stip. for Dismissal with 

Prejudice, ECF No. 15). The Court directs the Clerk to close this case. All 

pending motions, if any, are denied as moot. 

Done and ordered in Miami, Florida, on September 17, 2020.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-22895-RNS Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2020 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.17

                              KEY TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                         PROFIT SHARING AND 401(k) PLAN
                                2001 RESTATEMENT

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 3

     Pursuant to Section 10.2 of the Key Technology, Inc. Profit Sharing and
401(k) Plan, 2001 Restatement (the "Plan"), the sponsoring employer hereby
adopts the following amendment:

          1. Vesting Schedule. Section 5.3.1 of the Plan is amended by adding
     the following paragraph after the second full paragraph and vesting
     schedule:

          "This paragraph shall apply to Participants who complete an Hour of
          Service under the Plan in a Plan Year beginning after December 31,
          2001. In the event that such a Participant's employment terminates for
          any reason other than retirement, death or disability the percentage
          of the Participant's Employer Account which shall be vested and
          nonforfeitable shall be determined according to the following
          schedule:

               Years of Service             Vested Percentage

                  Less than 2                       0%
                       2                           25%
                       3                           50%
                       4                           75%
                       5                          100%

          2. This Amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 2002. Except as
     amended, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

                                                     KEY TECHNOLOGY, INC.


                                                     By:  /s/  Thomas C. Madsen
                                                         ----------------------
                                                     Date Signed: 7/3/02
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-159 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, September 8, 1998)

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET OCTOBER 20-22 IN AMARGOSA VALLEY AND LAS VEGAS, NEVADA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste

(ACNW) will meet in Amargosa Valley and Las Vegas, Nevada, October 20-22 to

discuss self-assessment and the proposed Yucca Mountain repository.

The first meeting will be held at the Longstreet Inn, Conference Room Colorado

#2, Stateline 373, Amargosa Valley. The second and third day sessions will be held at

Bally’s, Conference Room Las Vegas #1, 3645 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Las Vegas.

The meetings will begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 6:00 p.m. each day. All are open to the

public.

On the first day of the meeting, the committee will conduct a self-evaluation of

its performance, and examine steps to improve its operational efficiency. The second

and third days will be devoted to topics such as the site characterization of Yucca

Mountain for the proposed repository of high-level waste, the status of the Department

of Energy’s viability assessment including design options, total systems performance

assessment, cost estimates and schedule, and review of the NRC’s format and content

guide for reactor license termination.

The committee will also discuss reports on a variety of other technical issues,

and hear comments from the public, representatives from state and local governments,

and tribal nations about their concerns regarding nuclear waste disposal.

Further information regarding topics to be discussed, the chairman’s ruling on

requests for an opportunity to present oral statements and the time allotted for them,

can be obtained by contacting Richard K. Major, Chief, Nuclear Waste Branch, at (301)

415-7366.

Although meetings of the ACNW are open, they are not part of the NRC’s public

hearing process. The ACNW was established in 1988 to advise the Commission on all

aspects of nuclear waste management. While anyone may attend the sessions, the

committee will consider only oral or written statements, arranged in advance and limited

to specific matters set forth in a Notice of Meeting to be published in an upcoming issue

of the Federal Register. ACNW meeting notices, transcripts, and letter reports are
available for downloading or reviewing on the internet at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

#

(NOTE TO EDITORS: The use of self-contained tape recorders in the meeting room is

permitted during open portions of the meeting when a transcript is being kept. The use

of still, motion picture and television cameras - the physical installation and presence of

which will not interfere with the course of the meeting - will be permitted both before and

after the meeting, during any recess, and, at the discretion of the committee chairman,

while the meeting is in session.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING RECEIVER’S FOURTH APPLICATION FOR ALLOWANCE 

AND PAYMENT OF PROFESSIONALS’ FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF 

EXPENSES FOR APRIL 1, 2021 – JULY 31, 2021

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Receiver Ryan K. Stumphauzer’s Fourth

Application for Allowance and Payment of Professionals’ Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses 

for April 1, 2021 – July 31, 2021 [ECF No. 699] (“Application”), filed on August 16, 2021. The 

Court has reviewed the Application and is otherwise fully advised. 

This is a complex receivership involving the operation of a merchant cash advance business 

with a current receivable balance of over $400 million, and a group of investors that are seeking, 

collectively, more than $300 million dollars from the company. The Receiver and his

professional team are managing numerous operational issues involving more than 1,300 merchants 

that are parties to merchant cash advance agreements with Par Funding. The Application and 

records submitted by the Receiver reflect that the Receiver and his professional team have

reasonably and diligently discharged their duties. 

The Receiver’s tasks in this case have included negotiating with Par Funding’s merchants 

in an effort to reach settlements of MCA account balances; employing consultants to oversee and 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 734 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2021 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

manage Par Funding; pursuing various claims against non-parties that may generate additional 

income to the Receivership Estate; assuming responsibilities over various residential and 

commercial properties; responding to issues and document requests related to pending litigation 

and investigations involving the Receivership Entities; communicating with the Defendants and 

responding to discovery requests; and drafting status reports for the Court.

In performing these tasks, among others, the Receiver and his professional team have 

provided a significant benefit to the Receivership Estate, investors, and creditors at rates that the 

Court finds reasonable. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Application [ECF No. 699] is GRANTED as 

follows:

Professional Fees: $2,398,898.00

Expenses: $87,219.96

TOTAL: $2,486,117.96

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 26th day of August, 2021.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 734 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2021 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

HOWARD COHAN,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO.: 0:20-cv-61439-DMM

vs.

PANDA EXPRESS, INC.

d/b/a PANDA EXPRESS

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff, HOWARD COHAN and his 

undersigned counsel hereby give notice that the above captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, 

with prejudice against Defendant, PANDA EXPRESS, INC., d/b/a PANDA EXPRESS.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August 19, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day upon the following email:

Michael Lickerman

Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. 

1683 Walnut Grove Avenue

Rosemead, CA 91770

T. 312.953.1967

Michael.Lickerman@PandaRG.com

Attorney for Defendant

By: /s/ Gregory S. Sconzo

Gregory S. Sconzo, Esq. 

Florida Bar No.: 0105553

Sconzo Law Office, P.A.

3825 PGA Boulevard, Suite 207

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410

Telephone: (561) 729-0940

Facsimile: (561) 491-9459

Service Email: sconzolaw@gmail.com

Email: greg@sconzolawoffice.com 

Case 0:20-cv-61439-WPD Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/19/2020 Page 1 of 1
Environmental Quality Council Public Hearing 

October 5, 2012--Public Notice 

Newspaper Date of Publication 

Casper Star Tribune August 1 and 2, 2012 

Gillette News Record August 2, 2012 

Cody Enterprise August 1, 2012 

Wyoming Tribune-Eagle August 2, 2012 

Rock Springs Daily Rocket Miner August 1, 2012
§ 115.15 Reports by road vehicle or container manufacturer. Each manufacturer shall forward to the appropriate Certifying Authority, quarterly or when otherwise requested by that Authority: ( a ) The registration number or other identifying information on road vehicles, or serial numbers assigned to containers manufactured under a certificate of approval by design type; and
( b ) An attestation that each road vehicle or container to which a serial number was assigned was manufactured in full compliance with the certificate of approval by design type.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 810 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 810

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the list of diseases 
associated with exposure to certain herbicide agents for which there is 
  a presumption of service connection for veterans who served in the 
  Republic of Vietnam to include hypertension, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 17 (legislative day, March 16), 2021

 Mr. Tester (for himself, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Brown, Mr. Durbin, Ms. Cortez 
 Masto, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Casey, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Manchin, 
Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Coons, Mrs. Murray, Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. Hirono, Ms. 
 Smith, and Mr. Booker) introduced the following bill; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the list of diseases 
associated with exposure to certain herbicide agents for which there is 
  a presumption of service connection for veterans who served in the 
  Republic of Vietnam to include hypertension, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Care for Vietnam Veterans Act 
of 2021''.

SEC. 2. ADDITION OF ADDITIONAL DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH EXPOSURE TO 
              CERTAIN HERBICIDE AGENTS FOR WHICH THERE IS A PRESUMPTION 
              OF SERVICE CONNECTION FOR VETERANS WHO SERVED IN THE 
              REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM.

    Section 1116(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, as amended by 
section 9109 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116-283), is further 
amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
            ``(L) Hypertension.
            ``(M) Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined 
        significance.''.
                                 <all>
```
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-87 July 21, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC SCHEDULES MEETING ON INDIAN POINT 3 APPARENT VIOLATIONS

Three apparent violations of Nuclear Regulatory

Commission requirements at the Indian Point 3 nuclear power

plant will be discussed by agency staff and representatives of

the facility’s operator on Friday, July 24. Located in

Buchanan, N.Y., the plant is owned and operated by the New York

Power Authority.

The meeting, known as a predecisional enforcement

conference, is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. in the Public

Meeting Room at the NRC Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa.

It will be open to the public for observation.

NRC inspectors identified the infractions during a

special safety inspection conducted rom May 28 through June 12

at the plant. That inspection was performed as a follow-up to

the May 28 loss of normal power to one of the electrical

systems used to support safety-related plant equipment.

The apparent violations include: inadequate design

control of a modification to the emergency diesel generator

system during Indian Point 3's last refueling outage; failure

to address a degraded valve that supplies cooling to reactor

coolant pump components; and failure to assess the safety

implications of the degraded valve.

While the NRC has decided to hold a predecisional

enforcement conference, it does not mean the agency has

determined a violation has occurred or that enforcement action

will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent

violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide

the licensee with an opportunity to point out any errors that

may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable

the licensee to outline its proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made

at this conference. That decision will be made by NRC

officials at a later time.

#
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-10 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Thursday, April 1, 1999)

NRC FINDS PERFORMANCE ‘ACCEPTABLE’

AT HARRIS IN LATEST REVIEW

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance

remains acceptable in the NRC’s latest plant performance review at the Harris nuclear

power plant, operated by Carolina Power & Light Company southwest of Raleigh, North

Carolina.

In a letter to CP&L, NRC official Brian Bonser said overall performance was

acceptable and “the plant continued to be operated in a safe manner.” However,

Bonser said “problem identification and corrective action activities were not always

effective.”

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region

II Office of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power

plant in the nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of

plant performance and provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are being used as an interim measure to monitor

nuclear power plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after

suspending the Systematic Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a

new assessment program is developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every

12 to 24 months.

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will

provide quarterly performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators

and on inspection findings. This program will be tested at eight sites, including the

Harris plant, beginning in June and will be extended to all plants next January. A full

description of the new program is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

#
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Region II

101 Marietta Street, N.W.

Suite 2900

Atlanta, GA 30323

No: II-96-72 For

Immediate Release

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Monday,

August 26, 1996)

Telephone: (404) 331-5503/7878

NOTE TO EDITORS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled two

meetings this weekin Florida with mangers at two of the state's

nuclear power plants. These meetings are open to observation by

the public. NRC officials will be available to answer questions

from interested observers at each meeting's conclusion.

The meetings are scheduled as follows:

CRYSTAL RIVER

NRC officials will meet with managers of the Crystal River

nuclear power plant at 12:00 noon on Wednesday, August 28 in

Conference Room 101 in the plant's Nuclear Administration Building.

The meeting is to discuss Florida Power Corporation's corrective

action program at the Crystal River nuclear plant. The discussions

will address operator performance, regulatory sensitivity,

engineering performance, management oversight and involvement,

configuration management, and methods of determining the root

causes of problems.

ST. LUCIE

NRC officials will meet with managers of the St. Lucie nuclear

power plant at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, August 29 in Room 123 at the

plant's Training Building. The meeting is being held to discuss

St. Lucie's current plant status, equipment events and upgrades,

the status of the plant's Final Safety Analysis review project,

corrective action program improvements, and its steam generator

project status.

Reporters and photographers are welcome to attend, along with

members of the public, for purposes of observation. NRC officials

will meet with reporters when the meetings conclude to answer

questions related to the discussions.
#### STATE, Respondent, v. WAGEMANN, Appellant.

(183 N. W. 112.)

(File No. 4859.

Opinion filed June 2, 1921.)

New Trial — Rape—Newly Discovered Evidence, Non-cumulative, Non-diligence Re, Denial Affidavits, Motion Denied, Non-abnse of Discretion.

Where, in a prosecution for rape, new trial was sought 'on ground of newly discovered evidence, supporting affidavits tending to show defendant was not at the home of complaining witness on date in question; there 'being no showing of diligence in procuring such testimony on the trial, and such evidence being cumulative and being directly denied in denial affidavits properly admitted, concerning alleged newly discovered evidence; held, no abuse of discretion in denying motion.

Polley, P. J., not sitting.

The Defendant, John Wagemann, was convicted of the crime of rape, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

*Van Slyke & Agor,*and *C. S.*Acker, for Appellant.

*Byron S. Payne,*Attorney General, *Edwin R. Winans,*Assistant Attorney General, and *A. L. Bartlett,*-State’s Attorney, for Respondent.

Appellant submitted that: Proposed new evidence should be deemed true, and cited: McClellan’s Estate, 21 S. D. 209.

Respondent cited, to same point: State v. Southmayd, 37 S. D. 37s, 158 N. W. 404.

MoC'O'Y, J.

From a judgment of conviction of the crime of statutory rape and an order denying a new trial, the defendant appeals.

[1] The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict is not questioned. Motion for new trial, on the ground of newly discovered evidence, was made based on affidavits tending to show that appellant was not at the home of complaining witness on September 20, 1919, the date when said offense was testified by the complaining witness as having been committed. No diligence to procure such testimony on the trial is shown. The alleged newlly discovered evidence is cumulative and is directly denied. The affidavits in denial of the statements contained in the moving affidavits, relating to the alleged newly discovered evidence, were properly admitted. State v. Southmayd, 37 S. D. 375, 158 N. W. *187404. There was no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in overruling the motion for new trial.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

PO'LLEY, P. J., not sitting.
### §4331. Computation of compensation for stenographic assistance of committees payable from Senate contingent fund

Compensation for stenographic assistance of committees paid out of the items under "Contingent Expenses of the Senate" on and after June 27, 1956 shall be computed at such rates and in accordance with such regulations as may be prescribed by the Committee on Rules and Administration, notwithstanding, and without regard to any other provision of law.

(June 27, 1956, ch. 453, 70 Stat. 360.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 68c of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.