alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPhotoelectrochemical fabrication of spectroscopic diffraction gratings, phase 2This program was directed toward the production of Echelle diffraction gratings by a light-driven, electrochemical etching technique (photoelectrochemical etching). Etching is carried out in single crystal materials, and the differential rate of etching of the different crystallographic planes used to define the groove profiles. Etching of V-groove profiles was first discovered by us during the first phase of this project, which was initially conceived as a general exploration of photoelectrochemical etching techniques for grating fabrication. This highly controllable V-groove etching process was considered to be of high significance for producing low pitch Echelles, and provided the basis for a more extensive Phase 2 investigation.Document ID19930006503Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsRauh, R. David*(EIC, Inc. Norwood, MA, United States)*Carrabba, Michael M.*(EIC, Inc. Norwood, MA, United States)*Li, Jianguo*(EIC, Inc. Norwood, MA, United States)*Cartland, Robert F.*(EIC, Inc. Norwood, MA, United States)*Hachey, John P.*(EIC, Inc. Norwood, MA, United States)*Mathew, Sam*(EIC, Inc. Norwood, MA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1990Subject CategoryOpticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:190875NASA-CR-190875Accession Number93N15692Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: SBIR-08.01-9450CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS5-30086Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930006503.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Federal outer continental shelf (OCS)administrative boundaries, Gulf of Mexico region [electronic resource]
 
2010 | 2009 | 2006
 
SuDoc Number:I 72.12/4:M 57/2
Item Number:0671-A-04 (online)
CGP System Number:000616172
 
 
September 15, 2017**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 CASE NO: 4-20-cv-10069-JLK / Becerra

GERARDO FERNANDEZ and 

KORNPHAT HILDEBRANT,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THAI ISLAND RESTAURANT, LLC, a 

Florida limited liability company, and PHEN

P. FUTTERMAN,

Defendants.

____________________________________________/

NOTICE OF DISCOVERY TELEPHONIC HEARING BEFORE UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JACQUELINE BECERRA

The Plaintiffs notify the parties that United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra 

will hold a hearing on the Court’s discovery calendar for December 15, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. 

Specifically, the Plaintiff is requesting the Court address the following discovery issues:

a. Deficiencies in Defendant, Thai Island Restaurant, LLC’s Response to First Set of 

Interrogatories (the Interrogatories and Responses thereto are attached as Exhibit A and 

Exhibit B). Specifically, the Plaintiff seeks to compel better responses to Interrogatory 

#’s 2, 4, 5, and 7.

b. Deficiencies in Defendant, Thai Island Restaurant, LLC’s Response to Plaintiff’s First 

Request for Production. The Request for Production is attached as Exhibit C and Thai 

Island Restaurant, LLC’s Response to Request for Production is attached as Exhibit D.

Specifically, the Plaintiff seeks to compel RFP #’s 1, 2, 26 and 27.

The Parties should attend the hearing telephonically by calling 1-866-390-1828; the 

access code number is 2046890 followed by the # sign.

Case 4:20-cv-10069-JLK Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/04/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted,

s/. Peter Bober, Esq.

FBN: 0122955

Peter@boberlaw.com

BOBER & BOBER, P.A. 

2699 Stirling Road, Suite A-304

Hollywood, FL 33312

Tel: (954) 922-2298 

Fax: (954) 922-5455

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF GOOD FAITH

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) and Local Rule 7.1A(3)(a), counsel for Plaintiffs certifies 

that he in good faith contacted opposing counsel by email and telephone to address the 

Defendants’ discovery responses. The Plaintiff contacted Defendants promptly about the 

discovery issues on the same day responses were served (October 1, 2020). The Plaintiff spent 

numerous weeks attempting obtain supplemental discovery, however, deficiencies continued

remain. The Defendants, ultimately, agreed to supplement their discovery responses by 

November 11, 2020. On November 11, 2020, Thai Island finally supplemented its 

interrogatories, but it did not supplement its response to Request for Production. Because 

deficiencies still remained in the responses to interrogatories and request for production, on 

November 14, 2020, the Plaintiff contacted Chambers and the Defendants insofar as coordinating 

dates for a discovery hearing.

s/. Peter Bober

Fla. Bar. No. 0122955

Case 4:20-cv-10069-JLK Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/04/2020 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 79 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 79

To eliminate the disparity in sentencing for cocaine offenses, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 2021

Mr. Booker (for himself and Mr. Durbin) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To eliminate the disparity in sentencing for cocaine offenses, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eliminating a Quantifiably Unjust 
Application of the Law Act'' or the ``EQUAL Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF INCREASED PENALTIES FOR COCAINE OFFENSES WHERE 
              THE COCAINE INVOLVED IS COCAINE BASE.

    (a) Controlled Substances Act.--The following provisions of the 
Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) are repealed:
            (1) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(A) (21 U.S.C. 
        841(b)(1)(A)).
            (2) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(B) (21 U.S.C. 
        841(b)(1)(B)).
    (b) Controlled Substances Import and Export Act.--The following 
provisions of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 
U.S.C. 951 et seq.) are repealed:
            (1) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(1) (21 U.S.C. 
        960(b)(1)).
            (2) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(2) (21 U.S.C. 
        960(b)(2)).
    (c) Applicability to Pending and Past Cases.--
            (1) Pending cases.--This section, and the amendments made 
        by this section, shall apply to any sentence imposed after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, regardless of when the offense 
        was committed.
            (2) Past cases.--In the case of a defendant who, before the 
        date of enactment of this Act, was convicted or sentenced for a 
        Federal offense involving cocaine base, the sentencing court 
        may, on motion of the defendant, the Bureau of Prisons, the 
        attorney for the Government, or on its own motion, impose a 
        reduced sentence after considering the factors set forth in 
        section 3553(a) of title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
## NUMBER 13 - 14 - 00651 - C V COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN R E STATE FARM LLOYDS

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## ORDER
Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Per Curiam Order
Relator , State Farm Lloyds, f iled a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause

on November 10, 2014 , through which it contends that the trial court has abused its discretion in ordering relator to produce electronically stored infor mation

. See, e.g., T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 196.4; In re Weekley Homes, L.P. , 295 S.W.3d 309, 322 (Tex. 2009) (orig. proceeding). Relator has further filed a motion for stay pending mandamus through which
it seeks to stay the trial court’s order requiring the pro duction of electronically stored information pending resolution of this original proceeding.2

The Court, having exa mined and fully considered the motion for stay pending mandamus, is of the opinion that said motion should be granted. The motion for stay
pe nding mandamus is hereby GRANTED, and the trial court’s October 17, 2014 “Order Adopting Recommendation No. 4 (SF) of Special Master Regarding Case Management Order No. 3” and all trial court proceedings pertaining to the discovery of electronically stored information are ordered STAYED pending further order of this Court, or until th e case is finally decided. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”). The Court requests tha t the real parties in interest , the plaintiffs in this mult idistrict litigation proceeding, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought , file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. IT IS SO ORDERED. PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 13th day of November , 201 4

.
§ 133.4 Effective date, term, and cancellation of trademark recordation and renewals. ( a ) *Effective date.* Recordation of trademark and protection thereunder shall be effective on the date an application for recordation is approved, as shown on the recordation notice issued by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection instructing U.S. Customs and Border Protection Officers as to the terms and conditions of import protection appropriate.
( b ) *Term.* The recordation or renewal of an existing recordation of a trademark shall remain in force concurrently with the 20-year current registration period or last renewal thereof in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
( c ) *Cancellation of recordation.* Recordation of a trademark with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall be canceled if the trademark registration is finally canceled or revoked.
[T.D. 72-266, 37 FR 20678, Oct. 3, 1972, as amended by T.D. 91-77, 56 FR 46115, Sept. 10, 1991]
#### § 296.20 Prerequisite to compensation.

In order to receive compensation under the Act, a claimant must be an Injured Person who suffered an injury as a result of the Hermit's Peak/Calf Canyon Fire and sustained damages.
Exhibit
      23








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








The
      Board
      of Directors


YP
      Corp.:





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
      YP
      Corp., f/k/a YP.Net, Inc., on Form S-8 (File No. 333-107721) filed as of August
      7, 2003, of our report dated June 12, 2000, on the consolidated balance sheet
      of
      YP Corp. as of September 30, 1999 and the related consolidated statements of
      operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for
      each of the years in the two-year period ended September 30, 1999, which report
      appears in YP Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No.
      1).





/s/
      Epstein, Weber & Conover P.L.C.




Scottsdale,
        Arizona
 November
        30, 2005
### §1844. Savings provisions

The provisions of sections 1841 to 1846 of this title shall not be construed to—

(1) limit or otherwise affect any authority for the making of any appointment to, or for fixing or adjusting the pay for, the position of any employee described in subparagraph (1) or subparagraph (2) of section 1841 of this title;

(2) affect the continuity of employment of, or reduce the pay of, any employee holding any position referred to in subparagraph (1) of this section; or

(3) modify, change, supersede, or otherwise affect the provisions of sections 5504 and 6101(a)(5) of title 5, insofar as such sections relate to the Office of the Architect of the Capitol.

(Pub. L. 91–510, title IV, §484, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1197.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 166b–1d of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective immediately prior to noon on Jan. 3, 1971, see section 601(1) of Pub. L. 91–510, set out as an Effective Date of 1970 Amendment note under section 4301 of this title.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 0:20-cv-61557-WPD

ANTHONY JEROME WALKER, MERISIER MODELET,

TERRY BROWN-MONDESIR,

JOHN MICHAEL MUNRO, JENNIE 

TOMASELLO SKULA, MARIE DEPAROLESA

DAWN CHARLTON, MARJORIE CONNOR,

Plaintiffs,

vs. 

GRAMPA’S REAL ESTATE INC. d/b/a GRAMPA’S

BAKERY & RESTAURANT, and CAROL GRAMPA,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Verified Motion for Supplemental Fees 

Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) [DE 162] (the “Motion”), and the August 16, 2022 Report and 

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss [DE 174] (the “Report”). The Court 

notes that no objections to the Report [DE 174] have been filed, and the time for filing such 

objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings 

in the Report [DE 174] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte 

v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. 

Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). 

 Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the 

Report [DE 174] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees 

with the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning and conclusions. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report [DE 174] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 

Case 0:20-cv-61557-WPD Document 184 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2022 Page 1 of 2
2. Plaintiffs’ Motion [DE 162] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; 

and

3. Plaintiffs are entitled to attorney’s fees in the amount of $21,600.00, plus interest.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, 

this 31st day August, 2022.

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-61557-WPD Document 184 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2022 Page 2 of 2
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-57 October 2, 2000

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC OFFICIAL TO HOLD NEWS CONFERENCE IN SAN JUAN TO DISCUSS RESULTS

OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING OF VIEQUES ISLAND COMMUNITIES

The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s top official in the Southeastern United States will

hold a news conference in San Juan at 2:00 p.m. this Wednesday (October 4) at the Hampton Inn in

Isla Verde to discuss the final results of an environmental sampling program aimed at detection of

radioactive material at Vieques Island’s military areas and the communities of Isabel Segunda and

Esperanza.

Luis A. Reyes, administrator of the NRC’s Region II office in Atlanta, will also explain how

the agency is continuing its regulatory oversight function as navy personnel work to remove

radioactive depleted uranium rounds inadvertently fired at the island during a past military exercise.

Mr. Reyes, a native of Puerto Rico, will conduct the news conference in both Spanish and

English and copies of the NRC report (in English only) will be available to reporters.

Electronic media personnel are requested to arrive at least 10 minutes prior to the 2:00 news

conference in order to set up necessary equipment.

Mr. Reyes will be available following the news conference for individual interviews by

interested reporters who attend.

#
#### Frank Smith, Appellant, v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corporation, Respondent.

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows:Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93018, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 134.31 Requirements of other agencies.

Nothing in this subpart shall be construed as excepting any article (or its container) from the particular requirements of marking provided for in any other provision of any law, such as those of the Federal Trade Commission, Food and Drug Administration, and other agencies.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-98-01 January 2, 1998

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE ON APPARENT

VIOLATIONS OF NRC REQUIREMENTS AT QUAD CITIES STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet January 9

with representatives of Commonwealth Edison Company for a

predecisional enforcement conference on apparent testing

violations at the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station. The

facility is in Cordova, Illinois.

The meeting will start at 9:30 a.m. in the Third Floor

Conference Room of the NRC Region III Office, 801 Warrenville

Road, Lisle, Illinois. It is open to public observation. NRC

officials will be available at its conclusion to answer questions

from the news media and other interested observers.

The discussion will focus on Commonwealth Edison’s apparent

failure to perform a required leakage test of the reactor vessel

and certain piping systems before starting up Quad Cities Unit 2

in June of last year. The utility did not perform the test until

seven days later.

During an inspection in November and December, NRC

inspectors found several instances where the utility inadequately

implemented or missed other examinations or leakage tests.

Inspectors also noted that the utility did not perform an

adequate safety review of starting up the unit prior to

completing the test.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean

the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that

enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety

significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out

any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report;

and to enable the company to outline its proposed corrective

actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated

enforcement action, such as a fine, will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later date.
####
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Region II

101 Marietta Street, N.W.

Suite 2900

Atlanta, GA 30323

No: II-97-24 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark (404) 331-5503 (Thursday, March

13, 1997)

Roger Hannah (404) 331-7878

NRC STAFF TO MEET MARCH 21 WITH CRYSTAL RIVER MANAGEMENT

NRC Official Will Hold Press Conference Following Meeting

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with Florida

Power Corporation management in Crystal River, Florida, on Friday,

March 21, to discuss issues related to the company's recovery

efforts at the Crystal River nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be open to observation by interested members

of the public and the press.

NRC regional administrator Luis A. Reyes will hold a press

conference immediately following the management meeting to discuss

with news media representatives NRC regulatory issues related to

Crystal River. He will also be available to answer questions on

other nuclear issues of mutual interest.

Both the MANAGEMENT MEETING and PRESS CONFERENCE will be held

in Room 137 at the PLANT TRAINING CENTER, located at 8200 W.

VENABLE STREET in CRYSTAL RIVER. The management meeting is

scheduled from 12:00 noon until 2:30 p.m. with the news conference

immediately following.

#

EDITORS: This meeting location is away from the Crystal River

energy complex north of town. It is in the company's training

center, located on West Venable Street, just off U.S. Highway 19,

south of town. Turn onto Venable at the Crystal River airport and

proceed approximately 1/2 mile to the training center.