alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 96-35 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson May 29, 1996

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

NRC TO MEET WITH ENTERGY

TO DISCUSS AUGMENTED INSPECTION TEAM FINDINGS

The meeting is open for public observation.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting

with officials of Entergy Operations, Inc. Friday, May 31, to

discuss conclusions of the Augmented Inspection Team sent to the

plant last week. The meeting, which will be open for public

observation, will take place at 11 a.m. in Reeves E. Ritchie

Training Center Auditorium at Arkansas Nuclear One, near

Russellville, Arkansas.

The Augmented Inspection Team was sent to Arkansas Nuclear

One, Unit 1, following an electronics failure in the feedwater

system which lead to an unplanned plant shutdown. The shutdown

was complicated when main steam safety relief valves opened and

one of the valves failed to shut as designed. This lead to one

steam generator boiling dry.

There were no injuries or plant damage and repairs have been

completed. Unit 1 returned to full power operation late last

week. NRC officials will be prepared to answer questions from

the public or press after the meeting concludes.

####
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-23130-CIV-ALTONAGA/Goodman

JOSE CAMINAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

COL 323 CORP., et al.,

Defendants.

____________________/

ORDER 

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Approval of 

FLSA Settlement and to Dismiss the Case with Prejudice [ECF No. 26], filed October 26, 2020. 

The Court has carefully reviewed the Motion, the file, and applicable law. Being fully advised, it 

is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Approval of FLSA 

Settlement and to Dismiss the Case with Prejudice [ECF No. 26] is GRANTED. The Court retains

jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties’ Settlement Agreement (see Mot. 6–17) and to award 

attorney’s fees and costs in connection with such enforcement. The case is DISMISSED with 

prejudice. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 27th day of October, 2020.

CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-23130-CMA Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2020 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

ORDER ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON RECEIVER’S MOTION 

TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION TO (1) APPROVE PROPOSED PLAN OF 

DISTRIBUTION AND (2) AUTHORIZE FIRST INTERIM DISTRIBUTION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Receiver’s Motion to Supplement Motion 

to (1) Approve Proposed Plan of Distribution and (2) Authorize First Interim Distribution, filed on

September 23, 2024, [ECF No. 2047] (“Motion to Supplement”). In the Motion to Supplement, 

the Receiver details five amendments he wishes to incorporate into his Motion to (1) Approve 

Proposed Plan of Distribution and (2) Authorize First Interim Distribution, [ECF No. 2014] 

(“Distribution Motion”). The Court having carefully reviewed the Motion to Supplement and the 

record in this matter, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Any claimants whose claims are impacted by the Motion to Supplement are 

permitted to file a response to the Motion to Supplement of no more than ten (10) pages on or 

before October 7, 2024.

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 2048 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/24/2024 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

2. The Receiver shall file a reply to each response, or each category of response if 

applicable, on or before October 14, 2024.

3. The Court will consider the proposed amendments detailed in the Motion to 

Supplement in conjunction with, and incorporate its rulings as part of, the Court’s forthcoming

Order on the Distribution Motion.

4. The previous proposed order submission deadline of September 30, 2024, as set out 

in [ECF No. 2026], is hereby extended. The Receiver, and all parties contesting the Receiver’s 

Distribution Motion and Motion to Supplement, shall submit proposed orders to 

ruiz@flsd.uscourts.gov in Word format on or before October 18, 2024.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 24th day of September, 2024.

_________________________________

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: Counsel of record

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 2048 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/24/2024 Page 2 of 2
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 35 63

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ G ua da lup e E spi nosa G ar ci a; G ua da lu pe Esp ejel Esp in os a; Ju an Jo se Esp ejel Espi nosa
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Peti ti on er

s

v.
Mat th ew G. Whi ta ke r, Acti ng Att orne y Gene ral of t he Uni te d S ta te s
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Resp on de nt

__ __ __ __ __ __ Pet it io n fo r Rev ie w of a n Ord er o f th e Bo ard of I m

m ig rat io n Ap pe al s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Nov em

be r 29 , 20 18 Fi le d: Decem

be r 7, 2 01 8 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BENTON, BOW MAN, an d ERI CKSON, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Gua da lu pe Esp in os a Garci a, in di vi du al ly an d on be ha lf of he r two m in or ch il dr e n , a l l na ti ve s an d ci ti zen s of Mex ic o, pe ti ti on s fo r rev ie w of an or de r of th e Bo ard of Im

m ig rat io n App eal s up ho ld i n g a n im m ig rat io n jud ge ’s de ni al of wit hh ol di ng of r em ov al an d re li ef u nd er t he Co nv en ti on Agai ns t To rtu re (C AT).Upo n rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at su bs ta nt ia l ev id en ce su pp or ts th e de ni al of

wit hh ol di ng of rem ov al be cau se Esp in os a Garci a di d no t sh ow a cl ear pr ob ab il it y th at he r li fe or free do m wou ld be th reat en ed on acco un t o f m em be rs hi p in a pa rti cu la r
so ci al gro up , or an y ot he r pr ot ect ed gr ou nd sh ou ld sh e be ret ur ne d to Mex ic o. See 8 U.S.C. § 12 31 (b )(3 )(A) (li st in g pr ot ect ed gr ou nd s) ; De Cas tro -Gu ti erre z v. Hol de r, 71 3 F.3 d 37 5, 37 9 (8 th Ci r. 20 13 ) (d is cu ss in g st an da rd of rev ie w). W e al so co nc lu de th at su bs ta nt ia l ev id en ce su pp or ts th e de ni al of Esp in os a Garci a’s CAT cl ai m

. See Ngu re v. Ash cro ft, 36 7 F.3 d 97 5, 99 2 (8 th Ci r. 20 04 ) (in di vi du al se ek in g CAT pr ot ect io n m

us t de m on st rat e it is m or e li ke ly th an no t he wou ld be to rtu red if ret ur ne d to ho m e co un try).

The jud gm en t i s af

fir m ed . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
### §728. Expenditure of certain amounts

#### (a) Expenditure

Amounts described in subsection (b) may not be expended by a State for any purpose other than carrying out programs for which the State receives financial assistance under this subchapter, under subchapter VI, or under subchapter VII.

#### (b) Amounts

The amounts referred to in subsection (a) are amounts provided to a State under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) as reimbursement for the expenditure of payments received by the State from allotments under section 730 of this title.

(Pub. L. 93–112, title I, §108, as added Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, §404, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1160; amended Pub. L. 113–128, title IV, §417(b), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1655.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Social Security Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620, which is classified generally to chapter 7 (§301 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1305 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 728, Pub. L. 93–112, title I, §108, as added Pub. L. 102–569, title I, §129(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4389, related to expenditure of certain amounts, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 105–220.

#### Amendments

2014—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–128 substituted "under subchapter VI" for "under part B of subchapter VI".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions of Terms in Pub. L. 113–128

Except as otherwise provided, definitions in section 3 of Pub. L. 113–128, which is classified to section 3102 of this title, apply to this section.
#### § 133.15 Term of CBP trade name recordation.

Protection for a recorded trade name shall remain in force as long as the trade name is used. The recordation shall be canceled upon request of the recordant or upon evidence of disuse. From time to time, the IPR & Restricted Merchandise Branch may request the trade name owner to advise whether the name is still in use. The failure of a trade name owner to respond to such a request shall be regarded as evidence of disuse.

[T.D. 72-266, 37 FR 20678, Oct. 3, 1972, as amended by T.D. 91-77, 56 FR 46115, Sept. 10, 1991]
#### In the Matter of Jacob L. Diamond, an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner.

First Department,

October 2, 1951.

*Frank E. Gordon*for petitioner.

*Joseph L. Greenberg*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Respondent admits that he improperly commingled funds of a client with his own funds. However, all money has now been properly accounted for by respondent who has been frank in his statements to the G-rievance Committee of the Bar Association. The facts not being in dispute, there is no need of a reference of this matter. The court is of opinion that, in view of mitigating circumstances, a censure will be sufficient punishment.

The respondent should be censured.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Bespondent censured.
18°30" fle

Poverty Level
be P
?

ALBANIA

Percentage of the poor: 18.5%
Depth of poverty: 4%
Severity of poverty: 1.3%

Coastal Area

T
41°30!

o
o
a
+

Percentage of the poor’: 16.2%
Depth of poverty: 3.2%
Severity of poverty: 1%

Central Area

Percentage of the poor: 21.2%
Depth of poverty: 5%
Severity of poverty: 1.8%

Mountain Area

* Percentage of the poor: 25.6%
Depth of poverty: 5.1%
Severity of poverty: 1.5%

Le : .
o
cf

30 15 0 30 Kilometers
I eee
re?

40°

ALBANIA

Produced by GIS Unit, March 2007

fem,
(USAID

FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

Source: World Bank Report, 2005
* The population whose real per capita monthly consumption is below USD 50

a99 19°30!
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.305 The appeal petition. ( a ) *Form.* There is no required format for an appeal petition. However, it must include the following information: ( 1 ) In a size appeal, a copy of the size determination being appealed;
( 2 ) The solicitation or contract number, and the name, address, and telephone number of the contracting officer;
( 3 ) A full and specific statement as to why the size determination or NAICS code designation is alleged to be in error, together with argument supporting such allegations; and
( 4 ) The name, address, telephone number, facsimile number, and signature of the appellant or its attorney.
( b ) *Service of size determination appeals.* The appellant must serve the appeal petition upon each of the following: ( 1 ) The SBA official who issued the size determination;
( 2 ) The contracting officer responsible for the procurement affected by a size determination;
( 3 ) The business concern whose size status is at issue;
( 4 ) All persons who filed protests; and
( 5 ) SBA's Office of General Counsel, Associate General Counsel for Procurement Law, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, facsimile (202) 205-6873, or e-mail at *OPLService@sba.gov .*
( c ) *Service of NAICS appeals.* The appellant must serve: ( 1 ) The contracting officer who made the NAICS code designation; and
( 2 ) SBA's Office of General Counsel, Associate General Counsel for Procurement Law, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, facsimile (202) 205-6873, or e-mail at *OPLService@sba.gov .*
( d ) *Certificate of service.* The appellant must attach to the appeal petition a signed certificate of service meeting the requirements of § 134.204(d).
( e ) *Dismissal.* An appeal petition which does not contain all of the information required in paragraph (a) of this section may be dismissed, with or without prejudice, by the Judge at his or her own initiative, or upon motion of a respondent.
[61 FR 2683, Jan. 29, 1996, as amended at 65 FR 57542, Sept. 25, 2000; 67 FR 47250, July 18, 2002; 69 FR 29208, May 21, 2004; 75 FR 47442, Aug. 6, 2010]
#### § 206.220 General.

This subpart provides policies and procedures for determinations of eligibility of applicants for public assistance, eligibility of work, and eligibility of costs for assistance under sections 402, 403, 406, 407, 418, 419, 421(d), 502, and 503 of the Stafford Act. Assistance under this subpart must also conform to requirements of 44 CFR part 201, Mitigation Planning, 44 CFR part 206, subparts G—Public Assistance Project Administration, I—Public Assistance Insurance Requirements, J—Coastal Barrier Resources Act, and M—Minimum Standards, 44 CFR part 9—Floodplain Management, and other applicable environmental and historic preservation laws, regulations, Executive Orders, and agency policy.

[81 FR 56533, Aug. 22, 2016]
### §132a. Appropriations for increase of general library

The unexpended balance of any sums appropriated by Congress for the increase of the general library, together with such sums as may hereafter be appropriated to the same purpose, shall be laid out under the direction of the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.

(R.S. §82; Feb. 7, 1902, No. 5, 32 Stat. 735; Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title II, §223, 60 Stat. 838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §82 derived from acts Apr. 24, 1800, ch. 37, §5, 2 Stat. 56, and Jan. 26, 1802, ch. 2, §6, 2 Stat. 129.

#### Amendments

1946—Act Aug. 2, 1946, changed composition of Joint Committee. See section 132b of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1946 Amendment

Amendment by act Aug. 2, 1946, effective Jan. 3, 1947, see section 245 of that act, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-12 February 8, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC COMMISSIONERS DICUS AND MERRIFIELD TO VISIT MILLSTONE

ON FEBRUARY 12

Commissioner Greta Joy Dicus and Commissioner Jeffrey S. Merrifield of the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission will visit the Millstone nuclear power station in Waterford, Conn., this

Friday, February 12. The Commissioners will be available to meet with the media after their

tour.

They will answer questions about the recovery efforts at Millstone 2, the operation of

Millstone 3, the agency’s oversight of that work and other nuclear-related topics.

The press availability will begin at 4:00 at the Leland F. Sillin Training Center at the

Millstone site.

During their visit, the Commissioners will tour the facility and meet with NRC staff

members and plant management. They will also meet with representatives of several public

interest groups.

Commissioner Dicus served her first term as NRC Commissioner from February 15,

1996 until June 30, 1998. Following her confirmation by the U.S. Senate, she was sworn in for

her second term on October 27, 1998. She is a radiation biologist by profession.

Commissioner Merrifield was sworn in as Commissioner on October 23, 1998. He had

previously served for several years as a senior counsel and legislative assistant to two U.S.

Senators, and as a Washington, D.C. attorney, specializing in environmental and regulatory

affairs.

#

EDITORS: A biographical sketch of the Commissioners is available upon request.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations as filed
as part of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           NOV-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,480
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                       222
<INVENTORY>                                     71,753
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,149
<PP&E>                                         101,427
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 196,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,259
<BONDS>                                         27,026
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,041
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   196,056
<SALES>                                         64,245
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,842
<CGS>                                           47,680
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     -
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    43
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,372
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,932
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,516
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,516
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-98-18 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Monday, March 9, 1998)

NRC OFFICIAL TO HOLD NEWS CONFERENCE NEAR

ST. LUCIE NUCLEAR PLANT

The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s top official in the Southeast will hold

a news conference in Jensen Beach near Florida Power & Light’s St. Lucie nuclear

power plant on Tuesday, March 17. Luis Reyes, Regional Administrator of the agency’s

southeastern office in Atlanta, will brief reporters and answer questions at 1:30 p.m. in

the Pelican Room at the Courtyard by Marriott, 10978 South Ocean Drive in Jensen

Beach.

He will provide comments on current issues and performance at the St. Lucie

plant, NRC participation in a St. Lucie plant emergency exercise March 18, cooperation

with the State of Florida, and the NRC’s inspection program at other NRC-licensed

facilities in the state.

Florida has five NRC-licensed commercial nuclear power reactors at three

locations. Florida Power & Light operates the two reactors at the St. Lucie plant as well

as two reactors at the Turkey Point plant near Homestead south of Miami. Florida

Power Corporation operates one reactor at the Crystal River plant near Crystal River on

the west coast of Florida. In addition, the University of Florida operates a small,

licensed non-power research and training reactor on its Gainesville campus.

Licenses to possess and use other radioactive materials in Florida, such as

those issued to hospitals, research facilities and construction companies, are issued by

the state under an agreement with the NRC under which the State of Florida has

agreed to require and inspect against safety requirements compatible with those

imposed by the NRC on such users in non-agreement states.

The news conference is being held as part of an NRC program to make senior

officials available to meet with news media representatives on a periodic basis to

provide briefings on subjects of current interest and answer questions from reporters

who attend.

#
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-97-80 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Monday, November

17,1997)

NRC CHAIRMAN TO VISIT ST. LUCIE NUCLEAR PLANT

Will Meet With Press On Monday, November 17 At 4:00 P.M.

EDITORS: PLEASE NOTE CHANGE IN PRESS CONFERENCE LOCATION

The Chairman of the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Dr.

Shirley Ann Jackson, will be at Florida Power & Light Company’s St.

Lucie nuclear power plant on Hutchinson Island near Ft. Pierce on

Monday, November 17 and will be available at 4:00 p.m. to meet with

interested news media representatives to answer questions related to

the visit.

MEDIA REPRESENTATIVES SHOULD COME TO GATE C AND PROCEED TO THE

SECURITY BUILDING WHERE THE PLANT IS ENTERED. YOU WILL BE DIRECTED TO

THE LOCATION OF THE ROOM WHERE CHAIRMAN JACKSON WILL BE AVAILABLE TO

DISCUSS TODAY’S VISIT.

Dr. Jackson will meet at St. Lucie with the NRC’s resident

inspectors, hold discussions with FP&L officials on current

improvement initiatives at the plant, and take a working tour of the

facility, including areas where replacement of the Unit 1 steam

generators is currently under way.

Chairman Jackson is a theoretical physicist who became an NRC

commissioner on May 2, 1995 and was named Chairman two months later on

July 1. She earned a Bachelor of Science degree in physics in 1968

and a Ph.D. in theoretical elementary particle physics in 1973, both

from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She conducted

research in theoretical physics, solid state and quantum physics, and

optical physics for a number of years at AT&T Bell Laboratories and

was a Professor of Physics at Rutgers University when appointed to the

NRC.

Dr. Jackson is the first African-American woman to receive a

doctorate from MIT, the first African-American to become an NRC

commissioner and the first woman and first African-American to serve

as NRC Chairman.

#