alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23527]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National SPA and Pool Institute

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the National Spa and Poll 
Institute (``NSPI'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the name and principal place of business of the standards 
development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards 
development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: National Spa 
and Pool Institute, Alexandria, VA. The nature and scope of NSPI's 
standards development activities are: to provide recommended minimum 
guidelines to builders, manufactures, installers and pool operators for 
the design, equipment, operation and installation of new construction 
and renovation of pools and spas.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23527 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-04 March 3, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD WORKSHOP ON ITS NEW REACTOR

INSPECTION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a workshop March 14-16 at the Wyndham

Arlington Hotel, Arlington, Texas, to discuss its revised reactor oversight program with industry

representatives in preparation for the program’s nationwide implementation in early April.

Since June of last year, 13 reactors at 9 sites throughout the U.S. have participated in a sixmonth pilot oversight program. From Region IV, these included Fort Calhoun Station and Cooper

Nuclear Station in Nebraska. NRC staff members have been assessing and modifying the new

inspection program before its nationwide expansion. The three-day workshop in Arlington will give

industry representatives at the non-pilot plants in the NRC’s Region IV an opportunity to become

familiar with the new program. The workshop also is open to the public.

Registration will be held from 8 to 10 a.m. on the first day of the workshop, March 14, at the

Arlington Wyndham, 1500 Convention Center Dr. The workshop will run from 10 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.

on March 14, from 8 a.m. to 4:45 p.m. on March 15 and from 8 a.m. until 4:15 p.m. on March 16. It

will feature presentations from NRC regional and headquarters staff with the first day focusing on a

program overview and performance indicators, which are measurements of a plant’s performance. The

second day will focus on the baseline inspection program, supplemental inspections, and the

significance determination process, which will be used by the agency to gauge the safety importance of

events and issues. The final day will focus again on the significance determination process, and

presenters also will discuss enforcement and the assessment process under the new program.

The revised reactor oversight program takes into account improvements in the nuclear industry

and the agency’s need to regulate the industry effectively with existing resources and staff. Under the

new program, the NRC will apply more objective and timely criteria in assessing a plant’s

performance, while focusing agency resources on areas that have the greatest impact on safe plant

operation.

Information about the revised reactor oversight process and the pilot program is available on

the Internet at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html.

####
### §1241. Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries

The Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of the Treasury shall, not later than the last day of the first calendar month beginning after September 2, 1974, establish a Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries (hereinafter in this part referred to as the "Joint Board").

(Pub. L. 93–406, title III, §3041, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 1002.)
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-020 February 28, 2001

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS SUBCOMMITTEES

TO HOLD MEETINGS IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, ON MARCH 15 AND 16

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has

scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on thermal-hydraulic phenomena on March 15, as well as a

joint session of its subcommittees on materials and metallurgy, thermal-hydraulic phenomena, and

reliability and probabilistic risk assessment, on March 16.

Both meetings will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at

11545 Rockville Pike. The subcommittee meeting on March 15, most of which will be open to the

public, will begin at 1:00 p.m. The joint subcommittee session on March 16, which will be entirely

open to the public, will start at 8:30 a.m.

The subcommittee on thermal-hydraulic phenomena will review the Westinghouse Electric

Corporation’s proposed approach in addressing thermal-hydraulic issues pertaining to its AP 1000

passive plant design. The joint subcommittees will discuss the status of risk-informed revisions to the

technical requirements of Section 50.46 of Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations, which deals

with the emergency core cooling systems in nuclear power reactors.

For additional information on the thermal-hydraulic phenomena subcommittee meeting, contact

Paul Boehnert, at 301-415-8065. Further information or schedule changes to the joint subcommittee

session can be obtained by contacting Michael Markley, at 301-415-6885. ACRS meeting notices,

transcripts and letters are available on the internet, at http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW/ .

###
### §35. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 35 was editorially reclassified as section 5302 of this title.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

Breck Henderson (Phone: 817-860-8128, E-Mail: bwh@nrc.gov)

RIV: 99-38

November 23, 1999

NRC TO HOLD “ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION” AT PUBLIC MEETING

DECEMBER 1 IN OMAHA ON NEW REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROGRAM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with invited community leaders,

industry representatives and members of public interest groups for a “roundtable” discussion of

the agency’s new reactor oversight process for Ft. Calhoun Station during a public meeting on

Wednesday, December 1.

The meeting will be at 7 p.m. at the Wyndam Garden Hotel, 11515 Miracle Hills Dr.,

Omaha, Nebraska. The roundtable discussion portion of the meeting will be open to public

observation. Members of the general public will have an opportunity to present their views to

NRC officials afterward.

Ft. Calhoun Station, a nuclear power plant operated by Omaha Public Power District, is

one of 13 plants at nine sites participating in a pilot program that began June 1 to test and

adjust the new oversight process. A public meeting is planned for each plant site. Following a

several month trial to verify the new program and determine if revisions are needed, the

process is expected to be implemented next year at all 103 commercial nuclear power reactors.

The NRC is seeking input from the public on its new reactor oversight process,

including the inspection and assessment programs to maintain safety, improve public

confidence, increase efficiency and effectiveness and reduce unnecessary regulatory burden.

The changes reflect, in part, improvements in nuclear power plant safety performance over the

past 20 years. Plants that perform well generally will have less regulatory oversight than plants

that have problems.

The pilot plant sites are: (1) Salem 1 and 2, near Wilmington, Delaware, operated by

Public Service Electric & Gas; (2) Hope Creek near Wilmington, Delaware, operated by Public

Service Electric & Gas; (3) Fitzpatrick, near Oswego, New York, operated by the Power

Authority of the State of New York; (4) Shearon Harris, near Raleigh, North Carolina, operated

by Carolina Power & Light Co.; (5) Sequoyah 1 and 2, near Chattanooga, Tennessee, operated

by the Tennessee Valley Authority; (6) Prairie Island 1 and 2, near Minneapolis, Minnesota,

operated by Northern States Power Co.; (7) Quad Cities 1 and 2, near Moline, Illinois, operated
by Commonwealth Edison Co.; (8) Ft. Calhoun, near Omaha, Nebraska, operated by the

Omaha Public Power District; and (9) Cooper, near Nebraska City, Nebraska, operated by the

Nebraska Public Power District.

Information on the new oversight program, including a list of questions that will be

discussed at the roundtable meeting, is available on the NRC website at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html.

##
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM HUSSMANN INTERNATIONAL'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              35
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      295
<ALLOWANCES>                                         4
<INVENTORY>                                        139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   485
<PP&E>                                             368
<DEPRECIATION>                                     168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              234
<BONDS>                                            295
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       816
<SALES>                                          1,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,315
<CGS>                                            1,035
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  23
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     95
<INCOME-TAX>                                        34
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 60
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        60
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.18<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.16
<FN>
<F1> For purposes of this exhibit, primary means basic.


</TABLE>
June 7, 2013

Mr. Kenneth S. Gray Director of Operations Executive Fliteway s, Inc. One Clark Drive Ronkonkoma, NY 11779
Dear Mr. Gray : This is in response to yo ur February 4 , 2013 letter (public docket No. FAA

- 20 11

- 0098 ) petitioning the Federal Aviati on Administration on behalf of Executive Fliteway s , Inc. (Executive Fliteway s) for an exemption from § 1 35 .225 ( f ) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) . That exemption, if granted, would allow Executive Fliteway s to make instrument flight rules ( IFR) takeoffs from foreign and military airports when the visibility is less than 1 statute mile or make an instrument approach when the visibility is less than 1⁄2 mile

. On January

11, 2012, the FAA amended 14 CFR § 135.225(f) relating to takeoff, approach , and landing minimums (77 FR 1629). A copy of this rule change is enclosed for your information. Because the relief you seek is now covered under the current rule, we will take no further action on y our petition. Sincerely , /s/ Id a M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. CRISTIAN RAZO SICAIROS, a/k/a Cristian Sicairos Razo, Defendant - Appellant. No. 14-1460 (D.C. No. 1:14-CR -00076-JLK-4) (D. Colo.)

________________ _________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before HOLMES , MATHESON , and PHILLIPS , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ Defendant-Appellant Cristian Razo Sicairos pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. He appeals his sentence. At the sentencing hearing, the district court (1) calculated his United States Senten cing Guidelines range as 188 to 235 months; (2) varied downward the equivale nt of two offense levels; and (3) sentenced him to 188 months.

* After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not ma terially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctr ines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive valu e consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### May 1, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court- 2 - ROA, Vol. III at 26-30. The court failed to calculate the post-variance Guidelines range (which would have been 1 51 to 188 months) or expl ain the sentence imposed. Id . It then entered a written judgment indicating the se ntence was below the Guidelines range. See ROA, Vol. I at 79, 80. Defense counsel did not object to the fore going; our review is therefore for plain error. United States v. Gantt , 679 F.3d 1240, 12 46 (10th Cir. 2012). Mr. Sicairos argues, and the Government ag rees, that the sentence is procedurally

unreasonable under Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38 (2007), and constitutes plain error. We agree. Exercising jurisd iction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), we vacate Mr. Sicairos’s sentence and remand for resentencing. 1

ENTERED FOR THE COURT,

Scott M. Matheson, Jr. Circuit Judge

1 At the sentencing hearing, the court and counsel for both sides seemed to understand that a prospective amendment to the United States Sentencing Guideline (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2D1.1 would have reduced th e defendant’s base offense level by two, and recognized the amendmen t would not be effective un til November 1, 2014, the next month. ROA, Vol. III at 23-24, 27. We note that the Probation Office determined Mr. Sicairos was responsible fo r 11.59 kilograms of “ice.” ROA, Vol. II at 10. This amount would appear to resu lt in the same base offense level—38—both before and after the 2014 ame ndment to U.S.S.G. § 2D.1.1.
§ 206.13 Standards and reviews. ( a ) The Administrator shall establish program standards and assess the efficiency and effectiveness of programs administered under the Stafford Act by conducting annual reviews of the activities of Federal agencies and State and local governments involved in major disaster or emergency response efforts.
( b ) In carrying out this provision, the Administrator may direct Federal agencies to submit reports relating to their disaster assistance activities. The Administrator may request similar reports from the States relating to these activities on the part of State and local governments. Additionally, the Administrator may conduct independent investigations, studies, and evaluations as necessary to complete the reviews.
[55 FR 2288, Jan. 23, 1990; 55 FR 5458, Feb. 15, 1990]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-148 October 3, 2000

NRC TO SURVEY INDIVIDUALS

WHO RAISE SAFETY CONCERNS TO THE AGENCY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission plans to survey nuclear industry workers and others who

raise safety concerns to the NRC to evaluate how well the agency responds to their safety concerns.

The NRC began a one-year pilot program October 1, to assess the effectiveness of its allegation

program for receiving, investigating and responding to concerns. The pilot is part of an ongoing effort

by NRC to improve its regulatory effectiveness.

As of October 1, those who report safety concerns to the NRC will be given a one-page

questionnaire along with a letter that informs them of the results of NRC’s review of the allegation.

The questionnaire asks individuals to evaluate how they were treated by NRC staff, the timeliness of

telephone contacts or letters with NRC employees, the timeliness of the resolution of their concerns,

the adequacy of NRC’s explanations for its actions, whether the agency adequately protected their

identities if it was requested, and whether they would use the program again.

The agency's procedures for handling safety concerns are described in various parts of Title 10

of the Code of Federal Regulations, the NRC enforcement policy, other agency guidelines and at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/PUBLIC/ALLEGATION/index.html on the NRC’s web site. The overall

objective of the employee protection regulations is to promote an atmosphere where employees feel

comfortable raising safety concerns or engaging in other protected activity without fear of reprisal.

###
#### § 12.5 Shipment to other ports.

When imported merchandise, the subject of § 12.1, is shipped to another port for reconditioning or exportation, such shipment must be made in the same manner as shipments in bond in accordance with the requirements of part 18 of this chapter.

[CBP Dec. 17-13, 82 FR 45394, Sept. 28, 2017]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-27 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, February 13, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a

meeting on March 2 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will

begin at noon in Room T-2B1, of the NRC's One White Flint North

Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. The Subcommittee on Planning

and Procedures will discuss proposed ACRS activities and the

qualification of candidates for appointment to ACRS.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, will be described in a Notice of Meeting

published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

#
#### Pauline M. HORVATH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon R. ENGLAND,* Secretary of the Navy; et al., Defendants-Appellees. Pauline M. HORVATH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon R. ENGLAND,** Secretary of the Navy; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-16278, 01-15671.

D.C. No. CV-98-04562-MHP.

D.C. No. CV-98-04604-MHP.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 ***.

Decided May 24, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, WARDLAW, and W. FLETCHER Circuit Judges.

*

 Gordon R. England is substituted for his predecessor as Secretary of the Navy. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 Gordon R. England is substituted for her predecessor as Secretary of the Navy. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

***

 yjjg panei unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P, 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ****

Pauline M. Horvath appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgments for defendants in two actions alleging Horvath’s former employer, the Navy, conspired with the Office of Personnel Management and the Department of Labor to delay or deprive Horvath of workers’ compensation and disability retirement benefits and to retaliate against her for filing various equal employment opportunity complaints. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s summary judgment, *Burrell v. Star Nursery, Inc.,*170 F.3d 951, 954 (9th Cir. 1999), and we affirm.

*621The district court properly granted summary judgment in both cases because Horvath did not raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether any of the alleged wrongdoing constituted adverse employment actions under Title VII or the Rehabilitation Act. *See Brooks v. City of San Mateo,*229 F.Sd 917, 928-80 (9th Cir.2000).

The district court properly denied Horvath’s motion for recusal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 144, because Horvath’s motion relied exclusively on Judge Patel’s performance while presiding over this case. *See United States v. Studley,*788 F.2d 934, 939 (9th Cir.1986).

Horvath’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

****

 yijjg disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
---

---

# Exhibit 15.3

[Levy Cohen and Co. Letterhead]

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS

# OF

# Magic Software
Enterprises (UK) Limited

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-156686) of
our report dated January 21, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of Magic Software Enterprises (UK) Limited included in this annual report on Form 20-F of
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2008.

|/s/ Levy Cohen and Co.
LEVY COHEN AND CO.
Registered Auditors |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

April 24, 2009



---

---