alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.823 Effect of non-compliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment of non-originating fabric or apparel goods. ( a ) *General.* If an importer of a good for which a TPL claim is made fails to comply with any applicable requirement under this subpart, the Center director may deny preferential tariff treatment to the imported good.
( b ) *Failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment.* Where the requirements for preferential tariff treatment set forth elsewhere in this subpart are met, the Center director nevertheless may deny preferential tariff treatment to a good for which a TPL claim is made if the good is shipped through or transshipped in a country other than a Party, and the importer of the good does not provide, at the request of the Center director, evidence demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Center director that the requirements set forth in § 10.822 of this subpart were met.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JAMES B. QUILLIAMS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2762 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed February 2, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Chris Helinger, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
§ 111.36 Relations with unlicensed persons. ( a ) *Employment by unlicensed person other than importer.* When a broker is employed for the transaction of customs business by an unlicensed person who is not the actual importer, the broker must transmit to the actual importer either a copy of his bill for services rendered or a copy of the entry, unless the merchandise was purchased on a delivered duty-paid basis or unless the importer has in writing waived transmittal of the copy of the entry or bill for services rendered.
( b ) *Service to others not to benefit unlicensed person.* Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (c) of this section, a broker must not enter into any agreement with an unlicensed person to transact customs business for others in such manner that the fees or other benefits resulting from the services rendered for others inure to the benefit of the unlicensed person.
( c ) *Relations with a freight forwarder.* A broker may compensate a freight forwarder for referring brokerage business, subject to the following conditions: ( 1 ) The importer or other party in interest is notified in advance by the forwarder or broker of the name of the broker selected by the forwarder for the handling of his Customs transactions;
( 2 ) The broker transmits directly to the importer or other party in interest: ( i ) A true copy of his brokerage charges if the fees and charges are to be collected by or through the forwarder, unless this requirement is waived in writing by the importer or other party in interest; or
( ii ) A statement of his brokerage charges and an itemized list of any charges to be collected for the account of the freight forwarder if the fees and charges are to be collected by or through the broker;
( 3 ) The broker must execute a customs power of attorney directly with the importer of record or drawback claimant, and not via a freight forwarder or other third party, to transact customs business for that importer of record or drawback claimant. No part of the agreement of compensation between the broker and the forwarder, nor any action taken pursuant to the agreement, can forbid or prevent direct communication between the importer of record, drawback claimant, or other party in interest and the broker; and
( 4 ) In making the agreement and in all actions taken pursuant to the agreement, the broker remains subject to all other provisions of this part.
[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63318, Oct. 18, 2022]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:20-cv-23161-DPG

ROBIN VELEZ

Plaintiff,

vs.

NEOCIS, INC., a Foreign Corporation,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

The Plaintiff, ROBIN VELEZ, by and through her undersigned counsel, and in agreement with 

Defendant, NEOCIS INC.., hereby provides notice that the parties have reached a settlement of all 

claims in this case. The parties are in the process of finalizing the agreement and preparing the 

dismissal documents, which will be filed with the Court upon completion.

Dated: June 16, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

/s/Nathaly Saavedra

Nathaly Saavedra, Esq. 

Fla. Bar No. 118315

PEREGONZA THE ATTORNEYS, PLLC

1414 NW 107th Ave, Suite 302

Doral, FL 33172

Tel. (786) 650-0202

Fax. (786) 650-0200

Email: nathaly@peregonza.com

 

Case 1:20-cv-23161-DPG Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2021 Page 1 of 3
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 16, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being 

served this day on all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List in the manner 

specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some 

other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive 

electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

/s/Nathaly Saavedra, Esq

NATHALY SAAVEDRA, ESQ.

Case 1:20-cv-23161-DPG Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2021 Page 2 of 3
3

SERVICE LIST

Nathaly Saavedra, Esq. 

Fla. Bar No. 118315

Email: nathaly@peregonza.com

PEREGONZA THE ATTORNEYS, PLLC

1414 NW 107th Ave, 

Suite 302

Doral, FL 33172

Tel. (786) 650-0202

Fax. (786) 650-0200

Attorney for Plaintiff

Email: cmanzano@leoncosgrove.com

Counsel for Defendant

Method of Service: CM/ECF Notice

John R. Byrne, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 0126294

LEÓN COSGROVE, LLP

255 Alhambra Circle, 8th Floor

Miami, Florida 33134

Email: jbyrne@leoncosgrove.com

Case 1:20-cv-23161-DPG Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2021 Page 3 of 3
#### Leslie Frank, Respondent, v. May S. Jaffa et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.
### §4723. Annual report by Select Committee on Ethics

The Select Committee on Ethics of the Senate shall issue an annual report due no later than January 31, describing the following:

(1) The number of alleged violations of Senate rules received from any source, including the number raised by a Senator or staff of the committee.

(2) A list of the number of alleged violations that were dismissed—

(A) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in which, even if the allegations in the complaint are true, no violation of Senate rules would exist; or

(B) because they failed to provide sufficient facts as to any material violation of the Senate rules beyond mere allegation or assertion.

(3) The number of alleged violations in which the committee staff conducted a preliminary inquiry.

(4) The number of alleged violations that resulted in an adjudicatory review.

(5) The number of alleged violations that the committee dismissed for lack of substantial merit.

(6) The number of private letters of admonition or public letters of admonition issued.

(7) The number of matters resulting in a disciplinary sanction.

(8) Any other information deemed by the committee to be appropriate to describe its activities in the preceding year.

(Pub. L. 110–81, title V, §554, Sept. 14, 2007, 121 Stat. 773.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 72a–1i of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### §608. Lump-sum payments to enhance staff recruitment and to reward exceptional performance

(a) The Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall have the authority to make lump-sum payments to enhance staff recruitment and to reward exceptional performance by an employee or a group of employees.

(b) Subsection (a) shall apply with respect to fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1999.

(Pub. L. 106–57, title I, §106, Sept. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 418.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Congressional Operations Appropriations Act, 2000, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2000, and not as part of title II of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 which comprises this chapter.
#### Mary Donohue, Respondent, v. The County of Essex and Another, Defendants, Impleaded with John Anderson and Another, etc., Copartners, etc., Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. So opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### § 111.70 Additional submissions.

Upon receipt of the record, the Executive Assistant Commissioner will afford the parties a reasonable opportunity to make any additional submissions that are permitted under 5 U.S.C. 557(c) or otherwise required by the circumstances of the case.

[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63320, Oct. 18, 2022]
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.1026 Verification and justification of claim for preferential tariff treatment. ( a ) *Verification.* A claim for preferential tariff treatment made under § 10.1003(b) or § 10.1011 of this subpart, including any statements or other information submitted to CBP in support of the claim, will be subject to such verification as the Center director deems necessary. In the event that the Center director is provided with insufficient information to verify or substantiate the claim, the Center director finds a pattern of conduct, indicating that an importer, exporter, or producer has provided false or unsupported declarations or certifications, or the exporter or producer fails to consent to a verification visit, the Center director may deny the claim for preferential treatment. A verification of a claim for preferential tariff treatment under UKFTA for goods imported into the United States may be conducted by means of one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Written requests for information from the importer, exporter, or producer;
( 2 ) Written questionnaires to the importer, exporter, or producer;
( 3 ) Visits to the premises of the exporter or producer in the territory of Korea, to review the records of the type referred to in § 10.1009(c)(1) of this subpart or to observe the facilities used in the production of the good, in accordance with the framework that the Parties develop for conducting verifications; and
( 4 ) Such other procedures to which the Parties may agree.
( b ) *Applicable accounting principles.* When conducting a verification of origin to which Generally Accepted Accounting Principles may be relevant, CBP will apply and accept the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles applicable in the country of production.
#### §§ 208.53-208.59 [Reserved]
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-52 August 8, 2000

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING NEAR HATCH PLANT

ON CHANGES IN REACTOR OVERSIGHT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for August 23 to discuss

the new reactor oversight process which began at Southern Nuclear Operating Company’s Hatch

nuclear power plant, near Vidalia, Georgia, in April.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. EDT at the Southeastern Technical Institute’s Tattnall

Auditorium, Vidalia, GA, and members of the public will have the opportunity to ask questions during

the meeting.

The new oversight process uses more objective, timely, and safety-significant criteria in

assessing performance, while seeking to more effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. Under

the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based personnel are

supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators. These

performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant operations, including the viability of

redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection, and security measures.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC's web site every three months. The safety significance of each inspection finding or performance

indicator is characterized by a color -- green, white, yellow, or red.

The NRC response to the inspection findings and performance indicators will be based on the

significance of the items. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow, or red

assessments receive increasing NRC involvement. Multiple red findings could result in a plant

shutdown.

A plain language summary of the reactor oversight process is available from the NRC Office of

Public Affairs or on the web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm .

###
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Friday, November 5, 2004.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04-23568 Filed 10-18-04; 11:51 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR   Document 1197   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/29/2022   Page 1 of 2

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR   Document 1197   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/29/2022   Page 2 of 2
#### Adolf Mandel, Respondent, v. David Hopkins and William Hopkins, as Executors, etc., Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mo opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Haynes International l- Exhibit 10.11



Exhibit 10.11









	
Haynes

International,

Inc.
	
Haynes International, Inc.

1020 West Park Ave. 

P.O. Box 9013 

Kokomo, IN 46903-9013 
	
Jean C. Neel

Vice President-Corporate Affairs 

Phone: 765/456-6489

Fax: 765/456-6155 

e-mail:  jneel@haynesintl.com 

	










December 21, 2001







Mr. Calvin S. McKay

590 Academy Woods Dr.

Lake Forest, IL 60045



Dear Mr. McKay:



We are pleased to offer you
the position of Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer with Haynes
International, Inc. You will be reporting to Francis Petro, President &
Chief Executive Officer, and your annual salary will be $225,000. 


Included in this offer are
four (4) weeks of vacation upon hire. You will receive a signing bonus of
$100,000 (less applicable taxes) at the end of two years of employment. You will
be eligible for our Profit Sharing and Savings Plan (401k), hospitalization
plan, life insurance long-term disability and optional benefit plans (some
waiting periods do apply). 


A copy of the Moving and
Relocation Policy is attached. Haynes International will provide a car (Buick
LaSabre or equivalent). Moving and relocation benefits and the car will be
grossed up for taxes where allowable by law. In addition to the aforementioned
benefits you will be eligible for the Executive Compensation Plan, Stock Plan
(40,000 shares), and Management Incentive Plan (target is 45% of base salary). 



The Executive Compensation Plan consists of:



                
         •     Life insurance

                
         •     Deferred income plan

                
         •     Long term disability plan



The only contingency to
this offer is you must pass a physical/drug screen. We understand the
confidentiality factor during your decision period and will not schedule your
physical/drug screen until receiving your acceptance of this offer. 


It is further agreed that
should Haynes International, Inc. terminate your employment at their discretion,
Haynes would continue to compensate you for one year from the date of
termination. Compensation would be based on upon your salary at the time of
termination. 


We are eagerly awaiting
confirmation in writing that you accept this offer. This letter should not be
considered an employment contract and does not modify the employment-at-will
status. If you have any questions, please call me at (765) 456-6489. 


	
	
Sincerely,





/ss/   Jean C. Neel





	
I Accept:



/ss/ Calvin S. McKay 01/10/02
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Joseph H. Rossi, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Alliance Bancorp of New England,
    Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
    a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
    the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
    registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
       disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
       to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
       its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
       entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
       prepared;

    b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
       procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
       effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
       the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
       over financial reporting that occurred during registrant's most recent
       fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
       materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
       reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
    most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
    registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
    directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
       operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
       reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
       process, summarize and report financial information; and

    b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
       employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
       control over financial reporting.


Date: March 23, 2004       /s/ Joseph H. Rossi
                           -------------------
                           Joseph H. Rossi
                           President/Chief Executive Officer
122 STAT. 738 PUBLIC LAW 110–225—MAY 7, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5472 (S. 2534): 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Apr. 9, considered and passed House. 

Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–225 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2650 Dr. 

Martin Luther King Jr. Street, Indianapolis, Indiana, as the ‘‘Julia M. Carson 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JULIA M. CARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 2650 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Street, Indianapolis, Indiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Julia M. 

Carson Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Julia M. Carson Post Office Building’’. 

Approved May 7, 2008. 

May 7, 2008 

[H.R. 5472] 


jbridges on POFP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-33 August 8, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

ENTERGY COMMITS TO IMPROVE SECURITY

AT WATERFORD 3 NUCLEAR PLANT

NRC Issues Confirmatory Order

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has confirmed commitments made by Entergy

Operations, Inc., operators of the Waterford 3 nuclear power plant near Taft, Louisiana, to resolve

weaknesses in the physical security program at the plant. The NRC issued a confirmatory order on

August 4 that gives the company until November 30 to meet those commitments.

This action comes following an NRC inspection in March during table-top and realistic, forceon-force security exercises at Waterford 3. The inspection identified a number of weaknesses in the

plant’s security plan. Entergy security managers implemented interim compensatory measures

immediately after the exercise, which provided for adequate protection of the plant in the near term.

Since March, in a series of meetings and written communications, Entergy has committed to

make permanent improvements in the physical security program. In addition, Entergy will demonstrate

its ability to protect the plant in another force-on-force exercise within 90 days of completing

provisions in the confirmatory order.

###