alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4534. Obsolete references in existing law to basic pay rates

In any case in which—

(1) the rate of pay of any employee or position, or class of employees or positions, the pay for whom or for which is disbursed by the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives, or any maximum or minimum rate with respect to any such employee, position, or class, is referred to in or provided by statute or House resolution; and

(2) the rate so referred to or provided is a basic rate with respect to which additional pay is provided by law;

such statutory provision or resolution shall be deemed to refer, in lieu of such basic rate, to the per annum gross rate which an employee receiving such basic rate immediately prior to the effective date of this section would receive, without regard to such statutory provision or resolution, under section 334 1 of this title on and after such date.

(Pub. L. 91–510, title IV, §475, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1195; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §210(4), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1743.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 334 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §210(3)(A), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1743.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 335 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1996—Par. (1). Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "Chief Administrative Officer" for "Clerk".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective immediately prior to noon on Jan. 3, 1971, see section 601(1) of Pub. L. 91–510, set out as an Effective Date of 1970 Amendment note under section 4301 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### § 111.18 Reapplication for license.

An applicant who has been denied a license may reapply at any time by complying with the provisions of § 111.12 and addressing how deficiencies have been remedied.

[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63315, Oct. 18, 2022]
`

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-088 May 25, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND ON JUNE 13-15

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste has scheduled a

meeting on June 13-15 in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss, among other things, proposed Yucca

Mountain high-level waste repository issues.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s

Two White Flint North Building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, starting at 8:30 a.m. each day.

On the opening day of the meeting, the committee will review the latest draft version of the

Low-Level Waste Branch Technical Position on the performance assessment methodology for lowlevel waste sites, and discuss the West Valley Demonstration Project decommissioning plan. It will

begin preparation for the next public meeting with the Commission, where potential topics include:

NRC’s proposed rule on disposal of high-level radioactive waste in a proposed geological repository at

Yucca Mountain, Nevada; recent committee advice on the control of solid material from nuclear

facilities; highlights of the committee’s recent European trip; the agency’s defense-in-depth

philosophy; and the ACNW’s 2000 Action Plan.

On June 14, the day’s agenda will include representatives of the Department of Energy

presenting the status of the design for the proposed high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain and

discussions on the status of the NRC’s low-level radioactive waste program.

The third day’s schedule will feature a discussion with the NRC’s Director of the Division of

Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, and consideration of two draft

regulatory guides, DG-1067, “Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors,” and DG-1071, “Standard

Format and Content for Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities.”

Those who seek additional information or schedule updates about this meeting should contact

Richard Major, at 301-415-7366.

Other aspects of the meeting are described in the May 24 edition of the Federal Register.

ACNW meeting notices, transcripts and letters are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

###
Exhibit 99.2


                           GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.
                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greg Manning Auctions,
Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2002, I, Larry Crawford, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   this Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies
          with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended
          September 30, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of Greg Manning
          Auctions, Inc.


Dated:      November 6, 2002

                                    /s/ Larry Crawford
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Larry Crawford, Executive Vice President
                                    and Chief Financial Officer
§ 12.11 Requirements for entry and release. ( a ) The importer or his representative shall submit to the director of the port of first arrival, for each entry of plants or plant products requiring a plant quarantine permit, a notice of arrival, or its electronic equivalent, for any type of entry except rewarehouse and informal mail entries. Such notice shall be on a form, or its electronic equivalent, provided for the purpose by the Department of Agriculture. The director of the port of arrival shall compare the notice of arrival, or its electronic equivalent, which he receives from the importer or his representative with the shipping documents, certify its agreement therewith, and transmit it, together with any accompanying certificates or other documents pertaining to the sanitary status of the shipment, to the Department of Agriculture. The merchandise may not be moved, stored, or otherwise disposed of until the notice of arrival, or its electronic equivalent, has been submitted and release for the intended purpose has been authorized by an inspector of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs.
( b ) Where plant or plant products are shipped from the port of first arrival to another port or place for inspection or other treatment by a representative of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs and all CBP requirements for the release of the merchandise have been met, the merchandise must be forwarded as an in-bond shipment pursuant to part 18 of this chapter to the representative of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs at the place at which the inspection or other treatment is to take place. No further release by the port director will be required.
[28 FR 14710, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 78-99, 43 FR 13060, Mar. 29, 1978; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61285, Oct. 13, 2015; CBP Dec. 17-13, 82 FR 45394, Sept. 28, 2017]
#### § 4.1260 Scope.

These regulations contain the procedures for seeking temporary relief in section 525 review proceedings under the act. The special procedures for seeking temporary relief from an order of cessation are set forth in § 4.1266. Procedures for seeking temporary relief from alleged discrimina- tory acts are covered in § 4.1203.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-110 August 1, 2000

NRC PROPOSES TO AMEND REGULATIONS TO ALLOW USE OF SIMULATORS

TO FULFILL PORTION OF TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR

NUCLEAR PLANT OPERATORS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing to amend its regulations to allow applicants

for nuclear power plant operator licenses to use simulators, rather than the controls of actual nuclear

plants, in fulfilling a portion of their training requirements. The proposed rule also eliminates the

requirement for licensees to submit simulator performance test results to the NRC.

The proposed changes would maintain the integrity of the operator training process by ensuring

simulators replicate actual plants, and by implementing NRC reviews to ensure those simulators

provide for effective training and performance assessment of operator license applicants. The changes

also would eliminate outdated requirements for licensee certification of simulation facilities, and

eliminate routine submittals to the NRC of simulator performance test reports which have limited value

to the agency. The proposed revisions would also allow licensees to revise their simulator performance

testing programs to be compatible with updated industry standards.

Eligibility for a reactor operator license calls for a rigorous combination of education, training

and experience. To fulfill their experience requirements, candidates for an operator license must

perform five significant reactor control manipulations at an actual plant which affect the power level of

the reactor. Permitting operator candidates to fulfill some of their experience requirements on plantspecific simulators would enhance their qualifications in an environment more conducive to

individualized instruction, and would reduce unnecessary regulatory burden to licensees from

interrupting actual plant operations.

NRC requires that computerized control room simulators meet strict requirements and create

training conditions in an environment comparable to those of the actual plant control room. Realistic

scenarios are developed and used for training, which mirror situations that could actually occur under

certain plant conditions.

Written comments on the proposed amendments must be received by September 18.

Comments should be addressed to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

20555. Attn: Docketing and Service Branch. Comments also may be submitted via the NRC’s

electronic rulemaking web site, at http://www.nrc.gov

by selecting “rulemaking” from the toolbar and then “rulemaking forum.”
###
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 20-61543-CIV-ALTMAN 

HOWARD COHAN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMMERCIAL FOODS, INC,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/ 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with 

Prejudice [ECF No. 11]. Being fully advised, the Court hereby 

 ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. Each 

party shall bear its own fees and costs, except as otherwise agreed to. 

 DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida this 23rd day of September 2020. 

 _________________________________ 

 ROY K. ALTMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record 

Case 0:20-cv-61543-RKA Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2020 Page 1 of 1
MICHAE L F

. BENNE T COLORAD O

COMMITTEES : AGRICULTURE , NUTRITION , AN D FORESTR Y

BANKING , HOUSING , AN D URBA N AFFAIR S HEALTH , EDUCATION , L^BOR , AN D PENSION S SPECIA L COMMITTE E O N AGIN G 

# lanite d State s Senat e WASHINGTON , D C 20510-060 9 WASHINGTON

. DC : 45 8 RUSSEL L SENAT E OFFIC E ButLDiN G WASHINGTON , D C 2051 0 (202)224^585 2 COLORADO : 230 0 1 5T M STREE T SUIT E 45 0 DENVER , C O 8020 2 (303)455-760 0 http://www.bennet.senate.go v
Augus t 1,201 1 Aloh aLe y Associat e Director U.S
. Departmen

t of Transportatio n Smal l Communit

y Program , W86-31 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 C D

C O
RE : For t Collins-Lovelan d Municipa l Airport' s Applicatio n (DUN S #0764814070000 ) fo r aSma U Community Ai r

Servic e Developmen t

Pilo t Progra mGran t

(CFD A DOT-OST-2011-0119 ) Dea r Ms
. Ley : I a mplease d to suppor

t a n applicatio n recently submitted b y th e For t Collins-Lovelan d Municipa l Airpor t fo r th e Smal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Developmen

t Pilo t Progra mGrant
. If

approved , fundin

g wil l suppor t th e developmen

t of a n ai r servic e strategi c pla

n which wil l b e use d t o increas e awarenes s o f airpor t initiatives , suppor

t incumben t carriers , provid

e ne w jobs , an d improv e th e region' s acces s t o th e ai r transportatio n network
. The For t Collins-Loveland Municipa l Airpor t i s one o f 1 4 certified commercia

l servic e airport s i

n th e stat e of Colorado an

d i t serve s approximately 35,00 0 passenger s eac h year . Recen

t addition s o

f destination s suc

h a s the Mes aAirpor

t hav e elevate d th e need fo

r acomprehensiv e pla

n to introduc e othe

r potentia l servic e routes . Gran

t funds will suppor

t the critica l plannin g an

d developmen

t of th e genera

l aviation , corporate , an

d ai r carrie r community
. The For t Collins-Loveland Municipa l Airpor t ha s served resident s an

d businesse s well i

n Norther n Colorado
. Th

e For t Collin s Chambe

r o f Commerce , Th

e Loveland Chambe

r o f Commerc e an

d the Norther n Colorad o Economi c Developmen

t Corporation ar

e amon g severa l communit

y group s voicin g their suppor t fo r thi s gran t application
. A s th e deman

d grow s fo r regiona l transportatio n b

y flight , th e strategi c developmen

t o f long-rang e goal s an

d objective s will ensur

e tha t the airpor t continue s to b e a successfiil economi c generator . I encourag e yo

u to give th e gran

t applicatio n submitted b

y th e For t Collins-Loveland Municipa l Airpor t ever y appropriat

e consideratio n consisten

t wit h al l applicabl e law s an

d regulations
. Than

k yo u fo r you r attention , an

d pleas e notif

y m y offic e o f fund s awarded
. Sincerely ,
Michae l F
. Benne t United State s Senato

r

PRINTE D O N RECYCLE D PAPE R
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.531 Originating goods. Except as provided in § 10.543 of this subpart, a good imported into the customs territory of the United States will be considered an originating good under the SFTA only if: ( a ) The good is wholly obtained or produced entirely in the territory of one or both of the Parties;
( b ) The good is transformed in one or both of the Parties so that: ( 1 ) Each non-originating material undergoes an applicable change in tariff classification specified in General Note 25(o), HTSUS, as a result of production occurring entirely in the territory of one or both of the Parties; and
( 2 ) The good otherwise satisfies any applicable regional value content or other requirements specified in General Note 25(o), HTSUS; or
( c ) The good, in its condition as imported into the United States, is enumerated as an Integrated Sourcing Initiative good in General Note 25(m), HTSUS, and is imported from the territory of Singapore.
§ 7.920 Rules against discrimination. The rules stated in this section are limited by the exceptions contained in §§ 7.921 and 7.922 of these regulations. ( a ) *General rule:* No person in the United States shall, on the basis of age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
( b ) *Specific rules:* A recipient may not, in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, directly or through contractual licensing, or other arrangements, use age distinctions or take any other actions which have the effect, on the basis of age, of: ( 1 ) Excluding individuals from, denying them the benefits of, subjecting them to discrimination under, a program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance; or
( 2 ) Denying or limiting individuals in their opportunity to participate in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. The specific forms of age discrimination listed in paragraph (b) of this section do not necessarily constitute a complete list.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-123 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 2


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-123 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of 2
June 10, 2015
Elevated Cinematics LLC 623 Grecken Green Peachtree City GA 30269 PH: (770) 377-7469 United States Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration, Docket Operations 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington DC 20590 

## Application to Amend Section 333 Exemption No. 11749 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0872

By letter dated June 5, 2015, an exemption was granted to Elevated Cinematics LLC for relief under Section 333 of Public Law 112-95. Elevated Cinematics LLC hereby requests that this exemption be amended to include the following additional sUAS aircraft: - DJI Phantom 3 - DJI S900 - DJI S1000 There has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting Exemption No. 11749. Please let me know if there is any further information required in support of this petition. Regards,
Blaine Nathan Miller Owner, Elevated Cinematics LLC
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I W. Kerry Jackson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company. |

 

| Date: September 7, 2006 | By:    | /s/ W. Kerry Jackson         |
|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                         |   |                              |
|                         |   | W. Kerry Jackson             |
|                         |   | Executive Vice President and |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer      |
§ 133.52 Disposition of forfeited merchandise. ( a ) *Trademark (other than counterfeit) or trade name violations.* Articles forfeited for violation of the trademark laws, other than articles bearing a counterfeit trademark, shall be disposed of in accordance with the procedures applicable to forfeitures for violation of the Customs laws, after the removal or obliteration of the name, mark, or trademark by reason of which the articles were seized.
( b ) *Copyright violations.* Articles forfeited for violation of the copyright laws shall be destroyed except as provided in §§ 133.42(g) and 133.47(g).
( c ) *Articles bearing a counterfeit trademark.* Merchandise forfeited for violation of the trademark laws shall be destroyed, unless it is determined that the merchandise is not unsafe or a hazard to health and the Commissioner of Customs or his designee has the written consent of the U.S. trademark owner, in which case the Commissioner of Customs or his designee may dispose of the merchandise, after obliteration of the trademark, where feasible, by: ( 1 ) Delivery to any Federal, State, or local government agency that, in the opinion of the Commissioner or his designee, has established a need for the merchandise; or
( 2 ) Gift to any charitable institution that, in the opinion of the Commissioner or his designee, has established a need for the merchandise; or
( 3 ) Sale at public auction, if more than 90 days has passed since the forfeiture and Customs has determined that no need for the merchandise has been established under paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this section.
[T.D. 79-159, 44 FR 31969, June 4, 1969, as amended by T.D. 94-90, 59 FR 55997, Nov. 10, 1994; T.D. 97-91, 62 FR 61232, Nov. 17, 1997; CBP Dec. 24-03, 89 FR 52378, June 24, 2024]
### §524. Effect on State laws

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to impair or diminish the authority of any State to enact and enforce general criminal laws with respect to robbery, bribery, extortion, embezzlement, grand larceny, burglary, arson, violation of narcotics laws, murder, rape, assault with intent to kill, or assault which inflicts grievous bodily injury, or conspiracy to commit any of such crimes.

(Pub. L. 86–257, title VI, §604, Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 540.)
### §676. Power to revoke

#### (a) General rule

The grantor shall be treated as the owner of any portion of a trust, whether or not he is treated as such owner under any other provision of this part, where at any time the power to revest in the grantor title to such portion is exercisable by the grantor or a non-adverse party, or both.

#### (b) Power affecting beneficial enjoyment only after occurrence of event

Subsection (a) shall not apply to a power the exercise of which can only affect the beneficial enjoyment of the income for a period commencing after the occurrence of an event such that a grantor would not be treated as the owner under section 673 if the power were a reversionary interest. But the grantor may be treated as the owner after the occurrence of such event unless the power is relinquished.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 230; Pub. L. 99–514, title XIV, §1402(b)(2), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2712.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted "occurrence of event" for "expiration of 10-year period" in heading and in text substituted "the occurrence of an event" for "the expiration of a period" and "the occurrence of such event" for "the expiration of such period".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–514 applicable with respect to transfers in trust made after Mar. 1, 1986, except for transfers pursuant to a certain binding property settlement agreement, see section 1402(c) of Pub. L. 99–514, set out as a note under section 673 of this title.