alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-089 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Wednesday, June 4, 1997)

NRC STAFF SAFETY EVALUATION OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PLAN FOR

TRITIUM

PRODUCTION INDICATES LICENSE AMENDMENT TO BE REQUIRED

Commercial light-water reactors that want to produce tritium

for the

U.S. Department of Energy will need to submit a license

ammendment request to

the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for review and approval prior

to undertaking

such action.

The United States has not produced tritium, a radioactive

gas used as

a trigger for the fusion stage of nuclear weapons, since 1988,

when DOE's

production facility at Savannah River closed. Current,

short-term tritium

needs are being met by recycling tritium from dismantled U.S.

nuclear weapons,

but resumption of tritium production will be essential for

maintaining the

U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile and the U.S. nuclear deterrent.

DOE proposes to produce tritium in commercial light-water

reactors,

either by purchasing a reactor for its use that would require a

NRC license,

or by contracting with private industry at an existing

NRC-licensed facility.

In February, the Tennessee Valley Authority announced that

it planned to

use its Watts Bar nuclear power plant near Spring City,

Tennessee, to test a

concept for tritium production devised by DOE, which is also

expected to

invite other commercial light-water reactors to participate in

its program.
Under the terms of a Joint DOE/NRC memorandum of

Understanding of May

22, 1996, NRC is providing review and consultation services to

assist DOE in

assessing and resolving technical and licensing issues associated

with the

tritium production program. Earlier this year, DOE submitted a

report to the

NRC that the staff reviewed to determine whether the use of a

commercial

light-water reactor to irradiate a limited number of

tritium-producing

absorber rods raises issues requiring NRC review and approval.

As a result of its review of the DOE report, the NRC staff

has

determined that further study is required regarding the

consequences of off-site radiological releases during some

accident scenarios. These consequences

are not believed to be significant. Also, the staff has

determined that there

are plant specific issues that must be addressed by TVA and any

other NRC

licensee wishing to participate in the DOE program by submitting

a license

ammendment request to the NRC. Watts Bar currently has a license

ammendment

request before the Commission and the NRC will meet with TVA

officials today

to discuss this.

#
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-34 April 13, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC ISSUES LATEST ASSESSMENT OF PERFORMANCE AT FITZPATRICK

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance remains

acceptable at the James A. FitzPatrick nuclear power plant, in Scriba, N.Y. The plant is

operated by the New York Power Authority (NYPA).

In a letter to NYPA outlining the results of the NRC’s plant performance review, NRC

Region I official Richard V. Crlenjak said: “Overall, performance at FitzPatrick was acceptable,

but declined somewhat during this assessment period, as reflected by increased plant

challenges caused by equipment problems and lapses in operator performance during some

events and infrequent evolutions.”

Crlenjak also said routine operations were generally conducted well. He noted that

the fall 1998 outage was “generally successful with respect to refueling and modification

activities and in addressing material condition problems. Thus operational performance

improved following the outage.” He said work processes, maintenance activities and

engineering support for the plant were effective overall, but continued management attention is

needed to address challenges in these areas.

FitzPatrick is a voluntary pilot plant for the NRC’s new assessment process, which is

still under development and will affect inspections beginning in June. Prior to that, NRC will

carry out the normal inspection program and has scheduled two additional inspections at the

initiative of the Region I office. An Operational Safety Team Inspection is planned for next

month. The second initiative inspection will focus on external occupational exposure controls.

The text of the plant performance review (PPR) letter is available from the NRC

Region I Office of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power plant

in the nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of plant

performance and provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

PPRs are an interim measure the NRC is utilizing to monitor nuclear power plant

safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after suspending the Systematic

Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a new oversight and assessment

program is developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every 12 to 24 months.
The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will provide

quarterly performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators and on inspection

findings. This program will be tested at eight sites beginning in June and will be extended to all

plants next January. A full description of the new program is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

#
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIgnition and combustion characteristics of metallized propellantsShakedown and calibration of the experimental apparatus designed to study secondary atomization and ignition characteristics of aluminum slurry propellants was begun and nears completion. The burner was tested over an array of equivalence ratios and oxygen mass fractions to determine the permissible range of operating conditions. A burner flow control system was designed and fabricated which permits independent control of flame stoichiometry and oxidant O2 concentrations. The Sun slurry formulation was selected as the base for initial testing. Laser beam waists at the focal volume of the single particle sizing system were determined to be 396 microns for the Ar-ion and 81 microns for the He-Ne laser. Size calibrations using pinholes were completed and compared to Mie theory for light scattering from particles. A vibrating office droplet generator was used to test the single particle sizing system dynamically by producing a water droplet laden gas flow. The data acquisition and analysis programming was completed and testing is in progress. From initial results, the particle sizing, atomization and ignition detection systems appear to be performing as expected.Document ID19900017595Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsTurns, S. R.*(Pennsylvania State Univ. University Park, PA, United States)*Mueller, D. C.*(Pennsylvania State Univ. University Park, PA, United States)*Scott, M. J.*(Pennsylvania State Univ. University Park, PA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Subject CategoryInorganic And Physical ChemistryReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186870NAS 1.26:186870Accession Number90N26911Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-1044Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017595.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-7827-7] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency. 

# ACTION:

Notice of settlement. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Under section 122(h) (1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has entered into an Agreement for Recovery of Past Cost (Agreement) at the Forty-Third Street Bay Drum Superfund Site (Site) located in Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida, with twenty-nine (29) parties. EPA will consider public comments on the Agreement until November 15, 2004. EPA may withdraw from or modify the Agreement should such comments disclose facts or considerations which indicate the Agreement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. Copies of the Agreement are available from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Waste Management Division, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8887,                         *Batchelor.Paula@EPA.GOV*.                     

Written comment may be submitted to Ms. Batchelor at the above address within 30 days of the date of publication. 

Dated: September 24, 2004. 

Rosalind H. Brown, 

Chief, Superfund Information & Management Branch, Waste Management Division. 

[FR Doc. 04-23034 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61672-61673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Reissuances

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary license have been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as 
amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) 
and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of 
Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR 515.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   License no.                            Name/address                   Date reissued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
003966F.........................................  Amerasa Rapid Transit USA    September 21, 2004.
                                                   Inc., 2490-M Arnold
                                                   Industrial Way, Concord,
                                                   CA 94520.
009867N.........................................  ZHarro Schumacher dba        September 23, 2004.
                                                   Schumacher Cargo Lines,
                                                   15501 Texaco Avenue,
                                                   Paramount, CA 90723.

[[Page 61673]]

 
004395F.........................................  Superior Link International  September 27, 2004.
                                                   Inc., 380 S. Lemon Avenue,
                                                   Suite B1-G, Walnut, CA
                                                   91789.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 04-23487 Filed 10-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### Michael Di Menna, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Impleaded with Cooper & Evans Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1885

JOSEPH JOHNSON; JOHN C. POTEAT; LYNETTE EVERETT; MARSHALL E. GWYNN; ERIKA BANNISTER; LAMONT D. JACKSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Catherine C. Blake , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv
- 03768

- CCB )

Submitted : August 31, 2020 Decided: September 17, 2020

Before KING, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Andrew J

. Toland III, TOLAND LAW, LLC, Sparks, Maryland; James M

. Ray, II, RAY LEGAL GROUP, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellants. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General , Eric S

. Hartwig, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Bal timore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Johnson, John C. Poteat, Lynette Everett, Lamont D. Jackson, Marshall E. Gwynn, and Erika Bannister appeal the district court’s order granting the Maryland Transit
Administration’s motion to dismiss their claims brought under the Fair Labor Standard s Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201

- 219, on sovereign immunity grounds. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Johnson v. Md. Transit Admin. , No. 1:18

- cv
- 03768

- CCB (D. Md. filed July 19, 2019 & entered July 22, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

CONTACT: Mark Hammond Oct.

17, 1996

Office: (510) 975-0254 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

Home: (415) 674-1024

RIV-96-56

Pager: (800) 916-4952

NRC, SUPPLY SYSTEM OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT WNP-2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold two

predecisional enforcement conferences next week with officials of

the Washington Public Power Supply System to discuss apparent

violations associated with the restart of the WNP-2 nuclear power

plant in June and July.

The conferences will be at 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. on Tuesday,

Oct. 22, at the NRC Region IV office in Arlington, Texas. The

Supply System operates the WNP-2 plant near Richland, Wash. The

meetings will be open to the public for observation; NRC

officials will be available later for questions.

At 9 a.m., the parties will discuss five apparent violations

found by an NRC inspection of activities associated with the

restart of the plant in June after a refueling outage. The

apparent violations include failures to test certain equipment as

required, a failure to have procedures in place to ensure that

certain equipment is tested and changing reactor operating modes

by increasing reactor power while a required safety system was

declared inoperable.

At 1 p.m., the parties will discuss three apparent

violations found by a second NRC inspection conducted of plant

restart activities during June and July. The apparent violations

concern failures to follow command-and-control procedures as the

reactor was nearing criticality, and failures to establish

adequate procedures to direct those activities. (A criticality is

a self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction).

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference

does not mean that NRC has made a final determination that

violations did occur or that enforcement action, such as a

monetary fine, will be taken. The purpose is to discuss the
apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to

provide the Supply System an opportunity to challenge or correct

portions of NRC inspection reports; and for the licensee to

outline its corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any enforcement

action will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be

made later by senior NRC officials.

-30-
#### The L. N. Gross Company, Respondent, v. Aachen and Munich Fire Insurance Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### §30. Term of service of Members of Congress as trustees or directors of corporations or institutions appropriated for

In all cases where Members of Congress or Senators are appointed to represent Congress on any board of trustees or board of directors of any corporation or institution to which Congress makes any appropriation, the term of said Members or Senators, as such trustee or director, shall continue until the expiration of two months after the first meeting of the Congress chosen next after their appointment.

(Mar. 3, 1893, ch. 199, §1, 27 Stat. 553.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 722 of Title 31 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §1, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-147 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, July 13, 1999)

NOTE TO EDITORS: LICENSING BOARD RULING IN SHEARON HARRIS CASE

An NRC Atomic Safety and Licensing Board has granted a request by Orange

County, North Carolina, for a hearing on an application by Carolina Power & Light Co.

to double the spent fuel storage capacity at the Shearon Harris nuclear power plant in

North Carolina. The text of the Licensing Board’s order has been posted on the NRC

Internet web page at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports/lbp9925.htm.

###
§ 115.32 Approval plates. The manufacturer shall affix, in a clearly visible place on or near one of the doors or other main openings of each container manufactured to the approved design, a metal approval plate measuring at least 20 by 10 centimeters (7.8 by 3.9 inches). The following shall be embossed on or stamped into the surface of the approval plate: ( a ) “Approved for transport under Customs seal.”
( b ) “USA/(number of the certificate of approval)/(last two digits of year of approval).” (e.g. “USA/1600/84” means “United States of America certificate of approval number 1600, issued in 1984).” A two digit alpha suffix may be added to the certificate of approval number to identify the Certifying Authority, e.g., USA/1600-AB/85, USA/1600-IB/85.
( c ) Identification of the type of container and of the number of the container in the type series.
( d ) The serial number assigned to the container by the manufacturer (manufacturer's number).
#### Morton Milman, Respondent, v. Dorothy Denniston, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order denying her motion to cancel a *lis pendens*and granting plaintiff’s cross motion to amend the judgment entered September 3, 1946, by adding thereto a decretal paragraph adjudging that the complaint be dismissed. Order modified on the law and the facts by adding thereto an ordering paragraph that the amendment of the judgment of September 3, 1946, made by the order appealed from, be *nunc pro tune*as of the time of the entry of the original judgment. As so modified, the order is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondent. The modification is necessary in order to enable this court to resettle its order of affirmance entered February 24, 1947 (271 App. Div. 988), so as to recite that the order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and the amended judgment entered pursuant thereto dismissing the complaint, are affirmed. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Cars-well, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur. [190 Misc. 210.]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Mr. Richard W. Corey, Executive Officer CaliforniaAir Resources Board Post Office Box 

### 2815 Sacrarnentq, CalJifornia95812 Dear REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

## APR 192016

On March 11, 2016, CARB submittedrevisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We havereviewed thematerials submitted with the following documents and found that they fulfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V. APCD/AQMD Rule # Title Butte County 300 Open Burning. Prohibitions and Exemptions Placer County 250 Stationary Gas Turbines Sacramento

. 442 Architectural Coatings Metropolitan Ventura County 26.13 New Source Review-Prevention ofSignificantDeterioration This addresses all therevisions in this submittal. In the coming months we will review the complete revisions for actionpursuantto Clean AirAct section 110(k). Questions regarding our completeness review shouldbe directed to Arnold Lazarus at (415) 972-3024.

cc: Mr. James Wagoner, AirPollution Control Officer Butte County Air Quality Management District Mr. Erik White AirPollution Control Officer Placer County AirPollution Control District S74.
.4pRo’

Sincerely, Director, Air Division

P,,i,tedon 100’ Posteo,zsigi,,erRL’vchd Pr,p’,: Pn,ces ChIo,j,,’ F,-e’.Mr. Larry Green Air Pollution Control Officer Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District Mr. Michael Villegas Air Pollution Control Officer Ventura County Air Pollution Control District Ms. Karen Magiano, Chief Air Quality Planning and Science Division California Air Resources Board
-cr-06219-WDF Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2001 P
-cr-06219-WDF Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2001 P