alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §439. Violations and penalties

#### (a) Willful violations of provisions of subchapter

Any person who willfully violates this subchapter shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

#### (b) False statements or representations of fact with knowledge of falsehood

Any person who makes a false statement or representation of a material fact, knowing it to be false, or who knowingly fails to disclose a material fact, in any document, report, or other information required under the provisions of this subchapter shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

#### (c) False entry in or willful concealment, etc., of books and records

Any person who willfully makes a false entry in or willfully conceals, withholds, or destroys any books, records, reports, or statements required to be kept by any provision of this subchapter shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

#### (d) Personal responsibility of individuals required to sign reports

Each individual required to sign reports under sections 431 and 433 of this title shall be personally responsible for the filing of such reports and for any statement contained therein which he knows to be false.

(Pub. L. 86–257, title II, §209, Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 529.)
August 8, 2016

Mr. Terry Raber

Terry L Raber - TLR Industries

9080 County Road 245

Holmesville, OH 44633-9720

Re: FAA–2016–3622

Dear Mr. Raber:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst
### §1259. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces; certiorari

Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces may be reviewed by the Supreme Court by writ of certiorari in the following cases:

(1) Cases reviewed by the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces under section 867(a)(1) of title 10.

(2) Cases certified to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces by the Judge Advocate General under section 867(a)(2) of title 10.

(3) Cases in which the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces granted a petition for review under section 867(a)(3) of title 10.

(4) Cases, other than those described in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of this subsection, in which the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces granted relief.

(Added Pub. L. 98–209, §10(a)(1), Dec. 6, 1983, 97 Stat. 1405; amended Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XIII, §1304(b)(3), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1577; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title IX, §924(d)(1)(C), (2)(A), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2832; Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title V, §533(a)(1), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 261.)

#### Amendment of Paragraphs (3) and (4)

Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title V, §533(a)(1), (b), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 261 provided that, effective on the date that is one year after Dec. 22, 2023, and applicable with respect to any action of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in granting or refusing to grant a petition for review submitted to such Court for the first time on or after Dec. 22, 2023, with certain provisos, paragraphs (3) and (4) of this section are amended by inserting "or refused to grant" after "granted". See 2023 Amendment note below.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2023—Pars. (3), (4). Pub. L. 118–31 inserted "or refused to grant" after "granted".

1994—Pub. L. 103–337 substituted "Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces" for "Court of Military Appeals" in section catchline and wherever appearing in text.

1989—Pub. L. 101–189 substituted "section 867(a)(1)" for "section 867(b)(1)" in par. (1), "section 867(a)(2)" for "section 867(b)(2)" in par. (2), and "section 867(a)(3)" for "section 867(b)(3)" in par. (3).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2023 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 118–31(a) effective on the date that is one year after Dec. 22, 2023, and applicable with respect to any action of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in granting or refusing to grant a petition for review submitted to such Court for the first time on or after Dec. 22, 2023, with provisions relating to inapplicability to pending decisions and finality of decisions before effective date, see section 533(b) of Pub. L. 118–31, set out as a note under section 867a of Title 10, Armed Forces.

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the eighth calendar month beginning after Dec. 6, 1983, see section 12(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–209, set out as an Effective Date of 1983 Amendment note under section 801 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
### §628. Rules and regulations; exemptions

In accordance with the provisions of subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission may issue such rules and regulations as it may consider necessary or appropriate for carrying out this chapter, and may establish such reasonable exemptions to and from any or all provisions of this chapter as it may find necessary and proper in the public interest.

(Pub. L. 90–202, §9, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 605; 1978 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §2, eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 43 F.R. 19807, 92 Stat. 3781.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Equal Employment Opportunity Commission" and "it" substituted in text for "Secretary of Labor" and "he", respectively, pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1978, §2, 43 F.R. 19807, 92 Stat. 3781, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, which transferred all functions vested by this section in Secretary of Labor to Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, effective Jan. 1, 1979, as provided by section 1–101 of Ex. Ord. No. 12106, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1053.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 98-05 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson January 16, 1998

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

E-MAIL: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC, ENTERGY TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

AT WATERFORD 3 NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a predecisional enforcement

conference Friday, January 23, with officials of Entergy Operations Inc., which operates

the Waterford 3 nuclear power plant near Taft, Louisiana, to discuss apparent violations

of NRC requirements.

The conference will begin at 10:30 a.m. at NRC Region IV offices in Arlington,

Texas. The meeting will be open to public observation; NRC officials will be available

afterward for questions.

The apparent violations were identified during an inspection conducted

November 17 through December 5, 1997, and involve mis-operation of a safety-related

cooling system, the auxiliary component cooling water system. Operators allowed both

trains of the system to be inoperable at the same time and failed to detect and correct

the problem for more than seven hours.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean

that NRC has made a final determination that violations did occur or that enforcement

action, such as a monetary fine, will be taken. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss

the apparent violations, their causes and safety significance, and to provide Entergy

officials with an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the

NRC inspection report and present corrective actions that have been taken.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action

will be made at this conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later time.

###
### §1363. Jurors' employment rights

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action brought for the protection of jurors' employment under section 1875 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 95–572, §6(b)(1), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2457.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1363 was renumbered section 1366 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 95–572, §7, Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2457, provided that:

"(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the amendments made by this Act [enacting this section and section 1875, renumbering section 1363, relating to construction of references to laws of the United States or Acts of Congress, as section 1364, and amending sections 1863, 1865, 1866, 1869, and 1871 of this title] shall apply with respect to any grand or petit juror summoned for service or actually serving on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 2, 1978].

"(b) The amendment made by section 5 of this Act [amending section 1871 of this title] shall apply with respect to any grand or petit juror serving on or after the sixtieth day following the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 2, 1978]."
June 24, 2015

Mr. Drew Smith

P.O. Box 141 Baraboo, WI 53913

Dear Mr. Smith:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 8, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2187), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
98°W
1

96°W
1

94°wW
fl

92°;W
1

90°wW

88°w

86°W
1

32°N-4J [-32°N
30°N-J [-30°N
28°N- _ [-28°N
Bey .
d Wiceteen Sul ea Mexice) Central Gulf of Mexico Eastern Gulf of Mexico
anning Area Planning Area Planning Area
26°N- [-26°N
GULF OF MEXICO NAD 27 FEDERAL
OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF (OCS)
ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES
24°N- LEGEND The Maritime boundaries and limits shown above, b24°N
as well as the division between planning areas,
Planning Area Boundaries are for initial planning purposes only and do not
necessarily reflect the full extent of U.S. sovereign
Offshore Administrative Boundaries rights under international and domestic law.
U.S. 200 NM Limit N
wen BOEM Toon
Projection Geographic me a - soo em
North A Datum 1927 , _ aN
jorth American Datum nuary, MEXICO’ %
T T T T T T T
98°W 96°W 94°W 92°W 90°w 88°W 86°W
### Subtitle B—Joint Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Employee Stock Ownership Plan Task Force; Studies
Exhibit 15.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTRERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-156686) of our report dated March 18, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. included in this annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010.





Tel- Aviv, Israel
/s/ Kost, Forer, Gabbay & KasiererMarch 18, 2011
KOST, FORER, GABBAY & KASIERERA Member of Ernst & Young Global
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998), PART 39.001(1) CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY SCHEDULE OF AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

Page 1 of 1 

### AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airwort hiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.001(1) of CASR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that th e delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability secti on: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time me ntioned in the compliance section. GippsAero GA200 Series Aeroplanes


### AD/GA200/1 Wing Strut Bolt 17/2012

Applicability: All GA200 and GA200C aircraft, all serial numbers.
Requirement: Carry out the requirements of GippsAero service bulletin SB-GA200-2012-08 Issue 1, dated 22 August 2012 or later approved revision.
Compliance: Carry out the requireme nts of the service bu lletin within 10 flight hours and thereafter every 100 flight hours.

This Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on 24 August 2012.
Background: As a result of a reported case of failu re of the strut bolt thr ough the main spar on a GA200C aircraft, GippsAero has issued a mandatory service bulletin to alert operators and maintenance or ganisations and to provide inspection and rectification actions. This Airworthiness Directive makes this inspection and rectification action mandatory. Failure to complete the acti ons required by this service bulletin may result in wing strut bolt failure, re sulting in wing stru ctural failure.

Remarks: Due to the nature of the unsafe c ondition, a formal consu ltation process was not possible prior to this AD being published. As such interested parties are invited to comment on this AD before 24 September 2012. Enquiries/Feedback regarding this AD s hould be referred to the AD Cell, email airworthiness.dire ctives@casa.gov.au

Rick Leeds Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority 23 August 2012
#### § 6.34 Appeal of denial of access within FEMA.

A requestor denied access in whole or in part, to records pertaining to that individual, exclusive of those records for which the system manager is the Administrator, may file an administrative appeal of that denial. Appeals of denied access will be processed in the same manner as processing for appeals from a denial of a request to amend a record set out in § 6.55, regardless whether the denial being appealed is made at headquarters or by a regional official.
§ 333.31 General procedures. Before FEMA uses its allocations authority to address a supply problem within its resource jurisdiction, it will develop a plan that includes: ( a ) A copy of the written determination that the program or programs that would be supported by the allocation action are necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense;
( b ) A detailed description of the situation to include any unusual events or circumstances that have created the requirement for an allocation action;
( c ) A statement of the specific objective(s) of the allocation action;
( d ) A list of the materials, services, or facilities to be allocated;
( e ) A list or description of the sources of the materials, services, or facilities that will be subject to the allocation action;
( f ) A detailed description of the provisions that will be included in the allocation orders, including the type(s) of allocation orders, the percentages or quantity of capacity or output to be allocated for each purpose, and the duration of the allocation action (*e.g.,* anticipated start and end dates);
( g ) An evaluation of the impact of the proposed allocation action on the civilian market; and
( h ) Proposed actions, if any, to mitigate disruptions to civilian market operations.
MP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0257

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RICHARD LEE TOME, 

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 45-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including February 1, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

James Jeremiah Shea

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 10 2020

12/10/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0257
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  /s/      Hector      Ponte                                                                           |
| Hector      Ponte                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| Chief      Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| April      14, 2009                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.303 Originating goods. ( a ) *General.* For purposes of eligibility for a preference under the Agreement, goods may be regarded as originating goods if: ( 1 ) *Wholly of Canadian or United States origin.* The goods are wholly obtained or produced in the Territory of Canada or the United States, or both, as set forth in General Note 3(c), HTSUS;
( 2 ) *Transformed with a change in classification.* The goods have been transformed by a processing which results in a change in classification and, if required, a sufficient value-content, as set forth in General Note 3(c), HTSUS; or
( 3 ) *Transformed without a change in classification.* An assembly of goods, other than goods of chapters 61 to 63 of the HTSUS, which does not result in a change in classification because the goods were imported in an unassembled or disassembled form and classified as the goods, unassembled or disassembled, pursuant to General Rule of Interpretation 2(a), HTSUS, or because the tariff subheading for the goods provides for both the goods themselves and their parts, shall nonetheless be treated as originating goods if: ( i ) The value of originating materials and the direct cost of assembling in Canada or the United States, or both, as defined in § 10.305 constitute not less than 50 percent of the value of the goods when exported to the United States;
( ii ) The assembled goods are not subsequently processed or further assembled in a third country; and
( iii ) The goods satisfy the requirement in § 10.306.
( b ) *Originating materials.* For purposes of this section and § 10.305, the term “materials” means goods, other than those included as part of the direct cost of processing or assembling, used or consumed in the production of other goods, and the term “orginating” when used with reference to such materials means that the materials satisfy one of the criteria for originating goods set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Change in classification.* For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the expression “change in classification” means a change of classification within the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (Harmonized System) as published and amended from time to time by the Customs Cooperation Council.
( d ) *Articles of feather.* The goods are eligible to be treated as originating in Canada pursuant to General Note 3(c)(vii)(R)(12)(ee), HTSUS.
[T.D. 92-8, 57 FR 2453, Jan. 22, 1992]
#### § 7.923 Burden of proof for exceptions.

The burden of proving that an age distinction or other action falls within the exceptions outlined in §§ 7.921 and 7.922 is on the recipient of Federal financial assistance.