alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-24 March 2, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER AGREES TO IMPROVE

HANDLING OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has obtained agreement

from Washington Hospital Center to take numerous steps to improve

deficiencies found in the hospital’s program for handling,

controlling, storing and disposing of radioactive waste at its

Washington, D.C. facility.

This commitment is documented in an NRC confirmatory

action letter issued today, based on the results of an inspection

conducted February 24-26. An NRC inspector found that wastes

from many different areas within the facilities were not

adequately surveyed, identified, packaged, labelled, secured,

segregated, stored and disposed of, causing a loss of control

over radioactive material. One finding was that radioactive

waste was burned in the facility’s incinerator in early January

of this year, even though Washington Hospital Center does not

have an NRC license to incinerate radioactive materials. The

inspector also discovered that, in February 1996, contaminated

material was inadvertently given to a non-radioactive waste

hauler.

The NRC inspector noted that, because of the lack of

adequate controls, radioactive waste was often mixed with other

waste and taken to the incinerator facility. If the waste set

off incinerator radiation monitors, unqualified or untrained

workers responded, often attempting to identify the cause of the

radiation alarm by sorting through the waste bags and boxes by

hand.

Officials have agreed that the hospital will immediately

initiate corrective action by ensuring that proper radiological

surveys are conducted by trained and qualified staff. The

hospital also has made a commitment to ensure that procedures are

strictly implemented to ensure proper handling of radioactive

wastes.

Issuance of a confirmatory action letter does not preclude

the issuance of an order formalizing the commitments, nor does it
2

preclude NRC from taking enforcement action of violations of NRC

requirements that may have occurred.

#
### §2023. Control, care, and supervision of Senate Office Building

On and after June 8, 1942, the Senate Office Building, and the employment of all services (other than for the United States Capitol Police) necessary for its protection, care, and occupancy, together with all other items that may be appropriated for by the Congress for such purposes, shall be under the control and supervision of the Architect of the Capitol, subject to the approval of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration as to matters of general policy; and the Architect of the Capitol shall submit annually to the Congress estimates in detail for all services (other than for the United States Capitol Police) and for all other expenses in connection with said office building and necessary for its protection, care, and occupancy.

(June 8, 1942, ch. 396, 56 Stat. 343; Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title I, §102, title II, §224, 60 Stat. 814, 838; Pub. L. 111–145, §6(c)(2), Mar. 4, 2010, 124 Stat. 54.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 174c of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–145 substituted "other than for the United States Capitol Police" for "other than for officers and privates of the Capitol Police" in two places.

1946—Act Aug. 2, 1946, substituted "Committee on Rules and Administration" for "Committee on Rules".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1946 Amendment

Act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title I, §142, 60 Stat. 834, provided that section 102 of that act shall take effect on Jan. 2, 1947, and section 245 of title II of that act, 60 Stat. 839, provided that section 224 thereof shall "take effect on the day on which the Eightieth Congress convenes". The Eightieth Congress convened on Jan. 3, 1947.
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.18 Valuation of assembled articles.

As in the case of the appraisement of any other import merchandise (see subpart C of part 152 of this chapter), the full value of assembled articles imported under subheading 9802.00.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) (19 U.S.C. 1202), is determined in accordance with 19 CFR 152.100 *et seq.*

[T.D. 87-89, 52 FR 24445, July 1, 1987, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51248, Dec. 21, 1988]
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.82 [Reserved]
§ 103.34 Sanctions for improper actions by CBP officers or employees. ( a ) The improper disclosure of the confidential information contained in CBP documents, or the disclosure of information relative to the business of one importer or exporter that is acquired by a CBP officer or employee in an official capacity to any person not authorized by law or regulations to receive this information is a ground for dismissal from CBP, suspension, or other disciplinary action, and if done for a valuable consideration subjects that person to criminal prosecution.
( b ) Under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(F), the Special Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, has authority, upon the issuance of a written finding by a court that a CBP officer or employee who was primarily responsible for withholding a record may have acted arbitrarily or capriciously, to initiate a proceeding to determine whether disciplinary action is warranted against that officer or employee. Such proceedings are governed by Merit Systems Protection Board regulations found at part 1201 of Title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
[T.D. 81-168, 46 FR 32565, June 24, 1981. Redesignated by T.D. 96-36, 61 FR 19838, May 3, 1996, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-16, 80 FR 71693, Nov. 17, 2015]
### SERVE D JANUAR

Y 13 , 201 1 :'EFy\RTMENTO P U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N MNSPORTATIO N"

OFFIC EO FHEARING S '/\t \OPERATION S WASHINGTON , D C 

### ^'^ l JA N i M , P h 3 ? IN TH EMATTERO F SMIT H CABL ESYSTEMS , INC , FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP009AL001 2 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No
. FAA-2009-097 6 

### NOTIC EO FHEARIN GDATE S NOTIC EI S HEREB Y GIVE N that testimon y an devidenc e wil l b e hear dan dconsidere d TELEPHONICALL Y o n Februar y 8 , 2011
. Th e Hearin g wil l commenc e at 1:0 0 p.m . Alask aTim e an dcontinu e unti l concluded
. Th e partie s ar e t o coordinat e thei r schedule s an dth e logistic s o f th e telephoni c hearin g withPatrici aMatthews , Lega l Assistan t (202 ) 366-5121
. S O ORDERED
. 

# £-A ^

C-CLA ^ Richar dC
. Goodwi n U.S
. Administrativ e Law Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CP09AL001 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Ronal dG
. Smith , Presiden t Smit hCabl e Systems , Inc
. Throug hCounse l Bren t R
. Cole , Responden t

'5 Counse l Marsto n & Cole , PC
. 82 1 N Street , Suit e 20 8 Anchorage , A K

99501-213 6 TEL : 907-277-800 1 FAX : 907-277-800 2 Glenn H
. Brown , Complainant' s Counse l Senio r Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , AAL- 7 Alaskan Regio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 22 2 Wes t 7 * Avenue , #1 4 Anchorage , A K

99513-758 7 TEL : 907-271-527 1 FAX : 907-271-280 0 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r

202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202- 3 66-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration

, 60 0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Raymond Earl Freeman, * From the 70th District

 Court of Ector County,

 Trial Court No. A-31,685.

Vs. No. 11-14-00181-CR * July 24, 2014

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
### §5. Bulletin as to labor conditions

The Commissioner of Labor Statistics is authorized to prepare and publish a bulletin of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, as to the condition of labor in this and other countries, condensations of State and foreign labor reports, facts as to conditions of employment, and such other facts as may be deemed of value to the industrial interests of the country.

(Mar. 2, 1895, ch. 177, §1, 28 Stat. 805; Mar. 18, 1904, ch. 716, 33 Stat. 136; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §3, 37 Stat. 737.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Provision of act Mar. 2, 1895, as to printing of the bulletin for distribution is covered by section 1324 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.

Act Mar. 18, 1904, changed name of Department of Labor to Bureau of Labor.

Act Mar. 4, 1913, authorized substitution of "Commissioner of Labor Statistics" and "Bureau of Labor Statistics" for "Commissioner of Labor" and "Bureau of Labor", respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Statistics of Cities

Commissioner authorized to compile, as part of bulletin of Department, an abstract of main features of official statistics of cities having over 30,000 population, by a provision of act July 1, 1898, ch. 546, §1, 30 Stat. 648.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of Labor, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Labor, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 6 of 1950, §§1, 2, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-91 August 3, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC STAFF ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR TO SUSQUEHANNA

Alan J. Blamey has been selected as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s new

resident inspector at the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station in Berwick, Pa. He joins

Senior Resident Inspector Ken Jenison and Resident Inspector John Richmond at the

dual-reactor site.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors.

They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections,

monitoring major work projects and interfacing with plant workers and the public.

Mr. Blamey joined the NRC in September 1997 as a reactor engineer in the Region I Division of

Reactor Projects in King of Prussia, Pa. He was assigned to Susquehanna on July 5.

Prior to joining the NRC, Mr. Blamey worked for 13 years at Commonwealth Edison’s Quad

Cities Nuclear Power Station. He held various positions in the engineering and operations departments

and was a licensed senior reactor operator.

Mr. Blamey received a Bachelor of Science degree in nuclear engineering from The

Pennsylvania State University. He was recognized by the Philadelphia Federal Executive Board as

federal employee “Rookie of the Year 1998". Mr. Blamey and his wife live in Drums, Pa.

The Susquehanna resident inspectors can be reached at 717/542-2134.

#
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

September 14, 2010 

via email and regulations.gov 

Esta Rosenberg 

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc. for an exemption 

 under 49 U.S.C. § 40109 (Memphis-Mexico City) 

 Docket DOT-OST-2010-0230 

 

Dear Ms. Rosenberg: 

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above 

referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, Delta urges that 

the application be granted as soon as possible. 

 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

cc: Brian Hedberg, DOT 

 Linda Lundell, DOT 

info@airlineinfo.com
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-148 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, October 22, 1996)

NOTE TO EDITORS -- ACRS MEETING

Two subcommittess of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) have scheduled a

joint technical meeting October 30 - November 1, in Rockville,

Maryland, to discuss risked-based analysis of reactor operating

experience.

The meeting of the ACRS subcommittees on Probabalistic Risk

Assessment and Plant Operations, is open to the public. It will

begin at 8:30 a.m. each day in Room T-2B3 of Two White Flint

North, 11545 Rockville Pike.

Other aspects of the meeting, including the opportunity for

public comment, are described in a Notice of Meeting published in

the October 17 edition of the Federal Register.

#
§ 46.240 Establishing time limits for the NEPA process. ( a ) For each proposed action, on a case-by-case basis, bureaus shall: ( 1 ) Set time limits from the start to the finish of the NEPA analysis and documentation, consistent with the requirements of 40 CFR 1501.8 and other legal obligations, including statutory and regulatory timeframes;
( 2 ) Consult with cooperating agencies in setting time limits; and
( 3 ) Encourage cooperating agencies to meet established time frames.
( b ) Time limits should reflect the availability of Department and bureau personnel and funds. Efficiency of the NEPA process is dependent on the management capabilities of the lead bureau, which must assemble an interdisciplinary team and/or qualified staff appropriate to the type of project to be analyzed to ensure timely completion of NEPA documents.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-22427-COOKE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

vs.

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 

900 BISCAYNE BLVD UNIT #6107,

MIAMI, FLORIDA 33132

Defendants In Rem.

/

UNITED STATES= NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

Undersigned counsel hereby files this Notice of Reassignment as counsel of record for the 

United States of America in this cause. The prior counsel for the United States, AUSA Adrienne 

Rosen, is no longer counsel of record for the United States in this matter. 

Respectfully submitted,

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ

ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: s/ Marx P. Calderón 

Marx P. Calderón

Assistant United States Attorney

Court ID No. A5502700 

99 N.E. 4th Street, 7th Floor

Miami FL, 33132-2111

Telephone: (305) 961-9036

E-mail: Marx.Calderon@usdoj.gov

Case 1:20-cv-22427-MGC Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2021 Page 1 of 1
[No. 7119.

Decided February 13, 1908.]

#### Spokane Falls *&*Northern Railway Company, *Respondent, v.*Stevens County *et al., Appellants.**3*

Appeal from- a judgment of the superior court for Stevens county, Sullivan, J., entered September 23,1907.

Affirmed.

*The Attorney General, J. A. Rochford,*and *John P. Judson,*for appellants.

*M. J. Gordon*and *A. J. Laughon,*for respondent.

3

Reported in 93 Pac. 927.

*700Per Curiam.

The complaint in this case is in all material respects similar to the complaint considered by this court in *Great Northern R. Co. v. Snohomish County, ante*p. 478, 93 Pac. 924. There the demurrer to the complaint was sustained, while in this case the demurrer was overruled. In that case the plaintiffs' stood on their complaint, while in this case the defendants stood on their demurrer. For the reasons stated in the opinion just filed, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.
§ 204.41 Applicant eligibility. ( a ) The following entities are eligible to apply through a State recipient for a subgrant under an approved fire management assistance grant: ( 1 ) State agencies;
( 2 ) Local governments; and
( 3 ) Indian tribal governments.
( b ) Entities that are not eligible to apply for a subgrant as identified in (a), such as privately owned entities and volunteer firefighting organizations, may be reimbursed through a contract or compact with an eligible applicant for eligible costs associated with the fire or fire complex.
( c ) Eligibility is contingent upon a finding that the Incident Commander or comparable State official requested the applying entity's resources.
( d ) The activities performed must be the legal responsibility of the applying entity, required as the result of the declared fire, and located within the designated area.
[66 FR 57347, Nov. 14, 2001, as amended at 82 FR 42, Jan. 3, 2017]
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Don Crosbie, certify that:1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Claimsnet.com inc.;2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3) Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other consolidatedfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects theconsolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small businessissuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for Claimsnet.com inc. and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure control andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.5) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sindependent registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: February 16, 2006   /s/ Don Crosbie   Don Crosbie  President and Chief Executive Officer
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-57 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
### §143d. Funds available for workers compensation payments

#### (a) In general

Available balances of expired Library of Congress appropriations shall be available to the Library of Congress to make the deposit to the credit of the Employees' Compensation Fund required by subsection 8147(b) of title 5.

#### (b) Effective date

This section shall apply with respect to appropriations for fiscal year 2012 and each fiscal year thereafter.

(Pub. L. 112–74, div. G, title I, §1303, Dec. 23, 2011, 125 Stat. 1131.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2012, which is div. G of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.2023 Packing materials and containers for shipment. ( a ) *Effect on tariff shift rule.* Packing materials and containers for shipment, as defined in § 10.2013(o), are to be disregarded in determining whether the non-originating materials used in the production of the good undergo an applicable change in tariff classification set out in General Note 35, HTSUS. Accordingly, such materials and containers are not required to undergo the applicable change in tariff classification even if they are non-originating.
( b ) *Effect on regional value content calculation.* Packing materials and containers for shipment, as defined in § 10.2013(o), are to be disregarded in determining the regional value content of a good imported into the United States. Accordingly, in applying the build-down, build-up, or net cost method for determining the regional value content of a good imported into the United States, the value of such packing materials and containers for shipment (whether originating or non-originating) is disregarded and not included in AV, adjusted value, VNM, value of non-originating materials, VOM, value of originating materials, or NC, net cost of a good.
*Example.* Panamanian producer A produces good C. Producer A ships good C to the United States in a shipping container that it purchased from Company B in Panama. The shipping container is originating. The value of the shipping container determined under § 10.2016(a)(2) is $3. Good C is subject to a regional value content requirement. The transaction value of good C is $100, which includes the $3 shipping container. The U.S. importer decides to use the build-up method, RVC= (VOM/AV) × 100 (*see* § 10.2015(c))), in determining whether good C satisfies the regional value content requirement. In determining the AV, adjusted value, of good C imported into the U.S., paragraph (b) of this section and the definition of AV require a $3 deduction for the value of the shipping container. Therefore, the AV is $97 ($100−$3). In addition, the value of the shipping container is disregarded and not included in the VOM, value of originating materials.