alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1740. Copies of consular papers

Copies of all official documents and papers in the office of any consul or vice consul of the United States, and of all official entries in the books or records of any such office, authenticated by the consul or vice consul, shall be admissible equally with the originals.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 947.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §677 (R.S. §896; Apr. 5, 1906, ch. 1366, §3, 34 Stat. 100).

Words "authenticated by the consul or vice consul" were substituted for "certified under the hand and seal of such officer", for clarity. Words "in the courts of the United States", were omitted after "admissible". Such papers should be so admitted in all courts consistently with sections 1738 and 1739 of this title.

See also Rule 44 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Changes were made in phraseology.
#### § 112.4 Discrimination in employment.

Small business concerns and development companies which apply for or receive any financial assistance of the kind described in § 112.2(a) (1) and (2), including concerns which are identifiable beneficiaries of loans made under § 112.2(a)(2), may not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in their employment practices. Such assistance is deemed to have as a primary objective the providing of employment. Where a primary objective of the Federal financial assistance is not to provide employment, but discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in the employment practices of the recipient or other persons subject to the regulation tends, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, to exclude individuals from participation in, to deny them the benefits of, or to subject them to discrimination under any program to which this regulation applies, the provisions of § 112.7(a) shall apply to the employment practices of the recipient or other persons subject to the regulation, to the extent necessary to assure equality of opportunity and nondiscriminatory treatment.

[38 FR 17934, July 5, 1973]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-018 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, Februry 3, 1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS: BUDGET BRIEFING

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will conduct a briefing

for reporters on its Fiscal Year 1998 budget at 4 p.m. Thursday

(Feb. 6) in the Press Room (1F22) on the ground floor of the One

White Flint North building at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,

Maryland. This building is near the Washington Metro Red Line's

White Flint station.

###
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-07 March 28, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC, KERR ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER

TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a predecisional enforcement conference on

Friday with officials of the Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Center in Ada, Oklahoma, to

discuss five apparent violations of NRC requirements.

The conference will begin at 10:30 a.m. at the NRC Region IV office in Arlington, Texas. The

meeting will be open to public observation; NRC officials will be available afterward for questions.

The first two apparent violations involve poor security and material control practices.

Specifically, inspectors found that control of and access to two sealed sources was not maintained as

required, and improper storage of a source resulted in a radiation dose rate in an unrestricted area that

exceeded the applicable limit.

The other three apparent violations involve poor radioactive material use and possession

practices. The Center was found to have sealed sources that had been removed from portable gauges,

which is not permitted by its NRC license. No one at the Center was exposed to radiation in excess of

federal limits as a result of these practices.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that NRC has made

a determination that violations did occur or that enforcement action will be taken. The purpose of the

meeting is to discuss the apparent violations, their causes and safety significance, and to provide Kerr

Research Center officials with an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the

NRC inspection report and present corrective actions that have been taken or planned.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action will be made at

this conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials at a later date.

###
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Enforcement of License Conditions in Material Licenses

## HPPOS-059 PDR-9111210240

See the memorandum from J. A. Axelrad to H. E. Book dated June 30, 1983. Regions should follow the policy that licensees be cited for not meeting their license conditions even if the conditions are more restrictive than the minimally acceptable practices specified in regulatory guides.

In a memorandum dated December 23, 1982, Region V staff were informed that licensees should not be cited for commitments in their license applications that are more restrictive than the minimally acceptable guidance in regulatory guides, provided the licensee is complying with that guidance. This policy was questioned by NMSS in a March 14, 1983 memorandum that stated licensees should be cited for not meeting the commitments made in applications even if they are more restrictive than the minimally acceptable practices specified in regulatory guides.

Further, licensees who desire relief from commitments made in their applications should apply for license amendments. In their memorandum dated June 30,1983, IE stated that they agreed with NMSS and commitments made by licensees in applications and incorporated as license conditions should be enforced, provided that meeting the commitments would not lead to unsafe conditions. Regulatory guides can not and should not alter commitments made in license applications that are subsequently incorporated into the license. If a licensee wants relief from a license commitment, an amendment to the license should be requested.

**Regulatory references:** License Conditions

**Subject codes:** 12.7

**Applicability:** All

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, October 13, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter World Currency Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      21,987,453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,288<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,906,928<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,906,928<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,030,439<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,327,251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                703,188
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            703,188
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   703,188
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $69,764 and due from
DWR of $6,524.
<F2)In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized loss on open contracts of $156,813.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $347,673, accrued
management fee of $54,684, and accrued administrative expenses of
$33,479.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $434,576, net
change in unrealized of $944,627 and interest income of $651,236.
</FN>


</TABLE>
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-60 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, April 17, 1996)

NRC RELEASES ALCOA SITE IN OHIO FOR UNRESTRICTED USE

FOLLOWING CLEANUP OF RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has released an Aluminum

Company of America (ALCOA) facility near Cleveland, Ohio, for

unrestricted use, following cleanup of radioactive contamination

to safe levels.

ALCOA and related companies used radioactive thorium at the

site from 1900 to 1961. There is little information on the

quantity and form of thorium used prior to 1954. From 1954 to

1961, thorium was used in the production of magnesium-thorium

alloys. The facility operated under an Atomic Energy Commission

license from 1954 to 1961, when the license expired.

Before license expiration, ALCOA transferred excess thorium

back to Dow Chemical Company, the thorium supplier. In 1981

ALCOA certified that all licensed material had been disposed of.

However, surveys performed at ALCOA from 1989 to 1992 showed

remaining thorium contamination in several locations. In

addition, depleted uranium from Chemetron Corporation, an

adjoining facility, was found on the site.

ALCOA began decommissioning the site in 1991, with Chemetron

performing cleanup activities for the depleted uranium. Based on

the companies’ remedial actions, NRC staff review of ALCOA and

Chemetron radiological survey reports, and confirmatory surveys

by NRC and its contractor (Oak Ridge Institute for Science and

Education), the NRC concluded that decommissioning has been

satisfactorily completed and that further remediation is not

required.

The NRC has removed the ALCOA site from its Site

Decommissioning Management Plan, which identifies about 50 sites

throughout the United States that are contaminated with

radioactive materials and warrant special attention.

#
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsObservation model and parameter partials for the JPL geodetic (GPS) modeling software 'GPSOMC'The physical models employed in GPSOMC, the modeling module of the GIPSY software system developed at JPL for analysis of geodetic Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) measurements are described. Details of the various contributions to range and phase observables are given, as well as the partial derivatives of the observed quantities with respect to model parameters. A glossary of parameters is provided to enable persons doing data analysis to identify quantities with their counterparts in the computer programs. The present version is the second revision of the original document which it supersedes. The modeling is expanded to provide the option of using Cartesian station coordinates; parameters for the time rates of change of universal time and polar motion are also introduced.Document ID19900018458Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSovers, O. J.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 15, 1990Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186972NAS 1.26:186972JPL-PUBL-87-21-REV-2Accession Number90N27774Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS7-918Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900018458.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 208.46 Title to equipment.

Title to equipment purchased by a Sponsoring Agency with funds provided under a DHS Response Cooperative Agreement vests in the Sponsoring Agency, provided that DHS reserves the right to transfer title to the Federal Government or a third party that DHS may name, under 2 CFR 200.313(e)(3), when a Sponsoring Agency indicates or demonstrates that it cannot fulfill its obligations under the Memorandum of Agreement.

[79 FR 76087, Dec. 19, 2014]
### §§2851 to 2854. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–128, title V, §511(a), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1705

Section 2851, Pub. L. 105–220, title I, §126, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 971, authorized allotments for workforce investment activities for eligible youth. See section 3161 of this title.

Section 2852, Pub. L. 105–220, title I, §127, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 971, related to State allotments. See section 3162 of this title.

Section 2853, Pub. L. 105–220, title I, §128, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 976, related to allocation within States of funds under this subchapter. See section 3163 of this title.

Section 2854, Pub. L. 105–220, title I, §129, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 978, related to use of funds for youth activities. See section 3164 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3101 of this title.
§ 142.14 What happens once an answer is filed? ( a ) When the reviewing official receives an answer, he must file concurrently, the complaint and the answer with the ALJ, along with a designation of an SBA representative.
( b ) When the ALJ receives the complaint and the answer, the ALJ will promptly serve a notice of oral hearing upon the defendant and the representative for SBA, in the same manner as the complaint, service of which is described in § 142.11. The notice of oral hearing must be served within six years of the date on which the claim or statement is made.
( c ) The notice must include: ( 1 ) The tentative time, place and nature of the hearing;
( 2 ) The legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held;
( 3 ) The matters of fact and law to be asserted;
( 4 ) A description of the procedures for the conduct of the hearing;
( 5 ) The name, address, and telephone number of the defendant's representative and the representative for SBA; and
( 6 ) Such other matters as the ALJ deems appropriate.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

Case No. 20-cv-22967-BLOOM

OPTIMUS MSO II INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SIMPLY HEALTHCARE PLANS, INC., 

Defendant. 

___________________________________________/

PLAINTIFF OPTIMUS MSO II INC.’S CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS 

AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Plaintiff, OPTIMUS MSO II INC. (“Plaintiff”), by and through undersigned counsel, 

hereby files its Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement, and 

states as follows:

1) Optimus MSO II, Inc., (“Optimus” or “Plaintiff”) is a Florida corporation.

2) The following is a list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, and/or 

corporations that may have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including 

subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal 

entities related to the parties. 

a) Optimus MSO II Inc. (Plaintiff);

b) Hirzel Dreyfuss & Dempsey, PLLC. (Counsel for Plaintiff);

c) Leon F. Hirzel (Counsel for Plaintiff);

d) Patrick G. Dempsey (Counsel for Plaintiff);

e) Alec Hayes (Counsel for Plaintiff);

f) Simply Healthcare Plans, Inc. (Defendant);

Case 1:20-cv-22967-BB Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

g) Amerigroup Corporation (Parent of Defendant);

h) ATH Holding Company, LLC (Parent of Defendant);

i)Anthem, Inc. (Parent of Defendant);

j) Hogan Lovells US LLP (Counsel for Defendant);

k) Craig H. Smith (Counsel for Defendant);

l) James L. VanLandingham (Counsel for Defendant).

Dated: August 27, 2020. Respectfully submitted,

HIRZEL DREYFUSS & DEMPSEY PLLC

Counsel for Plaintiff

2333 Brickell Ave, Suite A-1 

Miami, Florida 33129-2497

Telephone: (305) 615-1617

Facsimile: (305) 615-1585

By: /s/ Patrick G. Dempsey

 LEON F. HIRZEL

Florida Bar No. 085966

hirzel@hddlawfirm.com

PATRICK G. DEMPSEY

Florida Bar No. 27676

dempsey@hddlawfirm.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August 27, 2020, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. Copies of the 

foregoing document will be served upon interested counsel via transmissions of Notices of 

Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.

By: /s/ Patrick G. Dempsey

PATRICK DEMPSEY

Case 1:20-cv-22967-BB Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2020 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 4.1


 


 


DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES


REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


 


As of December 31, 2020, iAnthus Capital Holdings,
Inc. (“the Company”) had one class of security registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the “Exchange Act”), its common shares, no par value (the “Common Shares”).


 


Description of Common Shares


 


The following description of the Company’s
Common Shares is a summary and does not purport to be complete. It is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference
to the Articles of iAnthus Capital Holdings, Inc. (the “Articles”), which is incorporated by reference as an exhibit
to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of which this Exhibit 4.1 is a part. The Company encourages you to read its Articles
and the applicable provisions of the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) for additional information.


 


Authorized Capital Shares


 


The Company’s authorized capital shares
consists of an unlimited number of Common Shares without par value. As of December 31, 2020, there were 171,718,192 Common Shares
were issued and outstanding.


  


Voting Rights


 


Each Common Share carries the right to attend
and vote at all general meetings of shareholders.


  


Dividend Rights


Holders of the Company’s Common
Shares are entitled to dividends, if any, as and when declared by the Company’s Board of Directors and to one vote per Common
Share at meetings of shareholders.


Liquidation Rights


 


Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up
of the Company, the holders of the Common Shares may share, on a pro rata basis, the remaining assets of the Company as are distributable
to holders of the Common Shares of the Company.


 


Redemption, Call, Assessment, Cancellation,
Surrender, Pre-Emptive and Conversion Rights


 


The Company may, subject to certain exceptions,
purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any of its Common Shares at the price and upon the terms determined by the Company’s
Board of Directors. The Company’s Common Shares are not subject to call or assessment rights, rights regarding purchase for
cancellation or surrender, or any pre-emptive or conversion rights.


 


Transfer Agent and Registrar


 


The Company’s transfer agent and registrar
is Computershare Investor Services Inc. whose address is 100 University Avenue, 8th Floor, Toronto, ON M5J 2Y1.


 


Listing


 


The Company’s Common Shares are listed
on the Canadian Securities Exchange under the symbol “IAN” and quoted on the OTC Pink Tier of the OTC Markets Group,
Inc. under the symbol “ITHUF.”


 


 


 


-1-
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.421 Which Lenders may securitize?

All SBA participating Lenders may securitize subject to SBA's approval.
### Part D—Labor-Management Relations
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-96-59 September 23, 1996

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE WITH TOLEDO EDISON CO.

ON APPARENT FIRE PROTECTION VIOLATIONS AT DAVIS-BESSE PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet Thursday

(September 26) with representatives of Toledo Edison Co. for a

predecisional enforcement conference on apparent fire protection

violations at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station. The

facility is near Port Clinton, Ohio.

The meeting will be at 10 a.m. in the Third Floor Conference

Room of the NRC Region III Office, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle,

Illinois. The meeting is open to public observation.

Two apparent fire protection violations will be discussed at

the meeting. One involves the failure to take adequate

corrective action to avoid potential damage to certain motoroperated valves as a result of electrical shorts which could

occur during a fire in the plant's control room.

The second involves the failure of the utility to replace or

take other compensatory measures for inadequate radiant energy

shields for electrical cables in the reactor containment.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean

the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that

enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety

significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out

any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report;

and to enable the company to outline its proposed corrective

actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated

enforcement action, such as a fine, will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later time.

#####
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John Krohn, Appellant, v. The Warden and Keeper of City Prison, Brooklyn, and Another. Respondents.

Order affirmed on the authority of *People*v. *Charles Schweinler Press*(214 N. Y. 395), decided by the Court of Appeals March 26, 1915. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.