alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been revoked 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. 1718) and 
the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean 
Transportation Intermediaries, effective on the corresponding date 
shown below:

License Number: 004447F.
Name: Bestway Shipping, Inc.
Address: 269 E. Redondo Beach Blvd., Gardena, CA 90248.
Date Revoked: October 3, 2004.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

License Number: 004263F.
Name: Distribution Transportation Sevices Company.
Address: 827 West Terra Lane, P.O. Box 526, O'Fallon, MO 63366.
Date Revoked: September 20, 2004.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

License Number: 015742N.
Name: JB Han Company, Inc. dba Joinus Freight System.
Address: 550 E. Carson Plaza Drive, Suite 217, Carson, CA 90746.
Date Revoked: October 4, 2004.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

License Number: 002388F.
Name: Ram's Cargo Brokers, Inc.
Address: 3900 NW 79th Avenue, Suite 534, Miami, FL 33166.
Date Revoked: October 1, 2004.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

License Number: 016956F.
Name: Worldwide Group, Inc. dba World Trans Line.
Address: 14928 S. Figueroa Street, Gardena, CA 90248.
Date Revoked: October 1, 2004.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 04-23475 Filed 10-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-97-66 September 15, 1997 Contact: Ken Clark (404) 562-

4416 Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417

NRC OFFICIALS TO MEET WITH FP&L MANAGERS IN ATLANTA TO DISCUSS ST.

LUCIE

PLANT PERFORMANCE, STEAM GENERATOR REPLACEMENT AND EMPLOYEE

CONCERNS PROGRAM

Officials from the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Florida Power & Light

Company are scheduled to meet at the NRC office in Atlanta at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday,

September 23, to discuss the status of company efforts to improve performance at the St. Lucie

nuclear power plant, the schedule for replacement of the plant's Unit 1 steam generators and the

plant’s employee concerns program.

The meeting will be held in room 24T25 in the NRC offices at the Atlanta Federal

Center, located at 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. and is open to observation by interested members of

the public. NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to answer questions from interested

observers.

The meeting is part of a series of bi-monthly meetings between the NRC and FP&L to

discuss the status of plant performance improvement initiatives and other issues of current

interest at St. Lucie.

#
### §2502. Outreach to employers and labor unions

#### (a) In general

With funds available to the Secretary of Labor to carry out the operations of the Department of Labor in fiscal year 1994 and subsequent fiscal years, the Secretary shall carry out an outreach program to inform employers of technical assistance available under section 2503(a) of this title to assist employers to prepare the workplace to employ women in apprenticeable occupations and other nontraditional occupations.

(1) Under such program the Secretary shall provide outreach to employers through, but not limited to, the private industry councils in each service delivery area.

(2) The Secretary shall provide outreach to labor unions through, but not limited to, the building trade councils, joint apprenticeable occupations councils, and individual labor unions.

#### (b) Priority

The Secretary shall give priority to providing outreach to employers located in areas that have nontraditional employment and training programs specifically targeted to women.

(Pub. L. 102–530, §3, Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3466.)
1 Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 4:28 PM

To: 'FlyingMonkey2@hotmail.c om'; 'Flashnine@msn.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - Flying Monkey Aerial Videography

Dear Mr. Bennett:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2015

‐ 1392). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

* Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e.

‐ fixed

‐ wing,rotorcraft, lighter

‐ than

‐ air) for the

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This

information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

.

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information

described above by 7/1/2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying

you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDigital frequency synthesizer for radar astronomyThe digital frequency synthesizer (DFS) is an integral part of the programmable local oscillator (PLO) which is being developed for the NASA's Deep Space Network (DSN) and radar astronomy. Here, the theory of operation and the design of the DFS are discussed, and the design parameters in application for the Goldstone Solar System Radar (GSSR) are specified. The spectral purity of the DFS is evaluated by analytically evaluating the output spectrum of the DFS. A novel architecture is proposed for the design of the DFS with a frequency resolution of 1/2(exp 48) of the clock frequency (0.35 mu Hz at 100 MHz), a phase resolution of 0.0056 degrees (16 bits), and a frequency spur attenuation of -96 dBc.Document ID19910006638Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSadr, R.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Satorius, E.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Robinett, L.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Olson, E.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 15, 1990Subject CategoryAstronomyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:187814NASA-CR-187814JPL-PUBL-90-32Accession Number91N15951Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS7-918Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910006638.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §179u. Definitions

As used in sections 179l to 179w of this title—

(1) the term "Librarian" means the Librarian of Congress;

(2) the term "Board" means the National Film Preservation Board;

(3) the term "film" means a "motion picture" as defined in section 101 of title 17, except that such term does not include any work not originally fixed on film stock, such as a work fixed on videotape or laser disk;

(4) the term "publication" means "publication" as defined in section 101 of title 17; and

(5) the term "Registry version" means, with respect to a film, the version of a film first published, or as complete a version as bona fide preservation and restoration activities by the Librarian, an archivist other than the Librarian, or the copyright owner can compile in those cases where the original material has been irretrievably lost.

(Pub. L. 104–285, title I, §111, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3382.)
EXHIBIT 31.2

SHOE CARNIVAL, INC.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



|I, W. Kerry Jackson, certify that:
|----------------------------------
|                                  
|1.                                
|                                  
|2.                                
|                                  
|3.                                
|                                  
|4.                                
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|5.                                
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  

|Date: | September 13, 2007 | By:/s/ W. Kerry Jackson      | 
|----- | ------------------ | ---------------------------- | 
|      |                    | W. Kerry Jackson             | 
|      |                    | Executive Vice President and | 
|      |                    | Chief Financial Officer      | 



---
**Exhibit** **31.1**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
 Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, James
A. Coyne, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PLM Equipment Growth &
Income Fund VII (the Registrant).
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
 
 4.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 
 a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  disclosed
in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 5.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.
 
 
 
 
 Date: May
10, 2004  By:  /s/
James A. Coyne
 James A.
Coyne
 President
§ 0.1 Customs revenue function regulations issued under the authority of the Departments of the Treasury and Homeland Security. ( a ) *Regulations requiring signatures of Treasury and Homeland Security.* ( 1 ) By Treasury Department Order No. 100-16, set forth in the appendix to this part, the Secretary of the Treasury has delegated to the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to prescribe all CBP regulations relating to customs revenue functions, except that the Secretary of the Treasury retains the sole authority to approve such CBP regulations concerning subject matters listed in paragraph 1(a)(i) of the order. Regulations for which the Secretary of the Treasury retains the sole authority to approve will be signed by the Secretary of Homeland Security (or his or her DHS delegate), and by the Secretary of the Treasury (or his or her Treasury delegate) to indicate approval.
( 2 ) When a regulation described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section is published in the Federal Register, the preamble of the document accompanying the regulation will clearly indicate that it is being issued in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) *Regulations with respect to which the Department of Homeland Security is authorized to sign for the Department of the Treasury.* ( 1 ) By Treasury Department Order No. 100-16, set forth in the appendix to this part, the Secretary of the Treasury delegated to the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to prescribe and approve regulations relating to customs revenue functions on behalf of the Secretary of the Treasury when the subject matter of the regulations is not listed in paragraph 1(a)(i) of the order. Such regulations are the official regulations of both Departments notwithstanding that they are not signed by an official of the Department of the Treasury. These regulations will be signed by the Secretary of Homeland Security (or his or her DHS delegate).
( 2 ) When a regulation described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section is published in the Federal Register, the preamble of the document accompanying the regulation will clearly indicate that it is being issued in accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( c ) *Sole signature by Secretary of the Treasury.* ( 1 ) Pursuant to Treasury Department Order No. 100-16, set forth in the appendix to this part, the Secretary of the Treasury reserves the right to promulgate regulations related to the customs revenue functions. Such regulations are signed by the Secretary of the Treasury (or his or her delegate) after consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security (or his or her delegate), and are the official regulations of both Departments.
( 2 ) When a regulation described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section is published in the Federal Register, the preamble of the document accompanying the regulation will clearly indicate that the regulation is being issued in accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
[CBP Dec. 03-24, 68 FR 51869, Aug. 28, 2003, as amended at CBP Dec. 08-25, 73 FR 40724, July 16, 2008]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

I-00-02 January 7, 2000

NRC COMPLETES AGENCY ACTION ON LETTERS OF REPRIMAND

ISSUED TO MILLSTONE MANAGERS IN EMPLOYEE DISCRIMINATION CASE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has completed its administrative review of a

notice of violation and four letters of reprimand issued in April to five Northeast Nuclear Energy

Company managers for discrimination against three employees who raised safety concerns in the

1993-to-1995 time frame at the Millstone nuclear power plant in Waterford, Conn.

As a result of that review, the notice of violation and three letters of reprimand remain

as issued; one letter of reprimand has been withdrawn.

The NRC took this action after reviewing responses of the five managers. That review

determined that one of the individuals provided new and significant information not previously

available which indicated he was not responsible for the discriminatory action. The letters and

the names of all four recipients of the letters of reprimand have been withheld from public

disclosure while the review was under way.

Copies of the three letters that were issued, the notice of violation, and the responses to

them are available from the NRC Public Document Room and the Office of Public Affairs.

##

EDITORS: NRC issued a press release April 6 about the initial action in this case.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-8   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 1 of 2

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-8   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 2 of 2
### §2133. Acceptance and supervision of works of fine arts

The Joint Committee on the Library, whenever, in their judgment, it is expedient, are authorized to accept any work of the fine arts, on behalf of Congress, which may be offered, and to assign the same such place in the Capitol as they may deem suitable, and shall have the supervision of all works of art that may be placed in the Capitol.

(R.S. §1831.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 188 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

R.S. §1831 derived from act June 10, 1872, ch. 415, §1, 17 Stat. 362.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Works of Art Accepted or Removed

The following provisions relate to works of art accepted or removed by the Joint Committee on the Library:

Pub. L. 117–326, Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4452.—Replacement of bust of Roger Brooke Taney with bust of Thurgood Marshall.

Pub. L. 117–111, Apr. 13, 2022, 136 Stat. 1166.—Statues of Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Pub. L. 112–174, Sept. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1311.—Statue of Frederick Douglass.

Pub. L. 109–427, Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 2912.—Bust of Sojourner Truth.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          35,945
<SECURITIES>                                    20,031
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,181
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               215,292
<PP&E>                                          61,387
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,291
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 262,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,692
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              561
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     173,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   262,001
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,486
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  113,787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (469)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   574
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  45
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,123
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,049
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,074
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,074
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
#### § 70.9 Review of proposed projects.

An individual who proposes to build one or more structures on a portion of property that may be included inadvertently in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) may request FEMA's comments on whether the proposed structure(s), if built as proposed, will be in the SFHA. FEMA's comments will be issued in the form of a letter, termed a Conditional Letter of Map Amendment. The data required to support such requests are the same as those required for final Letters of Map Amendment in accordance with § 70.3, except as-built certification is not required and the requests shall be accompanied by the appropriate payment, in accordance with 44 CFR part 72. All such requests for CLOMAs shall be submitted to the FEMA Regional Office servicing the community's geographic area or to the FEMA Headquarters Office in Washington, DC.

[62 FR 5736, Feb. 6, 1997]
OFFICE OF 

### Jimmy Harris Madison County Mayor

Mr. Scott Faulk Essential Air Service Division DepartmentofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590

Dear Mr. Faulk: December 23, 2014 100 East Main, Suite 302 Jackson, Tennessee 38301

Phone: 731-423-6020

Fax: 731-988-3820

As you are aware, ourpast EAS carriers have not been able to increase our passenger countto an acceptable level for our airport. Therehave beenvarious issues with these carriersleadingto this problem but, I believe, the overriding factors with these carriers have beenthe routes (Memphis & Nashville), their dismal customer service and their lack ofpromotion in our community. We now have a carrier bidding on this service, Air Choice One, who brings a successful track record ofservice to other EAS communities and a proposed route to St. Louis. I thinkAir Choice One will bring better service to our community. After meetings and discussions with many business and industrial leaders in Jackson with Air Choice One, we are convinced theycan build

## a successful airline service for our community.
The Jackson-Madison CountyAirportAuthority has indorsed the selection ofAir Choice One to provide service for Jackson, Madison County, Tennessee. Ijoin in their decision and hope you will consider our community's endorsementin making your decision.
Should you wish to discuss this issue, please give me a call.