alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-22 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Friday, April 2, 1999)

NRC FINDS PERFORMANCE ‘ACCEPTABLE’

AT VOGTLE IN LATEST REVIEW

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance remains

acceptable in the NRC’s latest plant performance review at the Vogtle nuclear power plant,

operated by Southern Nuclear Operating Company near Waynesboro, Georgia.

In a letter to Southern Nuclear, NRC official Pierce Skinner said performance was

acceptable and “both units operated well, although there was a noticeable increase in the number

of equipment and personnel induced transients.” Skinner noted that there was also a decline in

security performance “in the area of escort control and security evaluations for work in the owner

controlled area.”

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region II Office

of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power plant in the

nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of plant performance and

provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are being used as an interim measure to monitor nuclear power

plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after suspending the Systematic

Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a new assessment program is

developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every 12 to 24 months.

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will provide quarterly

performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators and on inspection findings.

This program will be tested at eight sites beginning in June and will be extended to all plants next

January. A full description of the new program is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

#
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Notifications and Reports to Individuals

## HPPOS-215 PDR-9111220012

See the memorandum from J. D. Buchanan to J. E. Wigginton dated June 21, 1988. 

Worker requests for occupational exposure reports from licensees need not be in writing. Region III requested NRR guidance concerning a difference of opinion between a worker and the worker's former employer on whether a request pursuant to 10 CFR 19.13 (c) must be written. 10 CFR 19.13 subsections (b), (c), and (e) all require a licensee to respond to certain requests from a worker. However, 10 CFR 19.13 does not specify that these requests be in writing, and therefore, it is apparently not required.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 19.13

**Subject codes:** 2.2, 2.3

**Applicability:** All

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 17, 2017
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-031 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, February 26,

1997)

NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON STRATEGIES TO HELP ITS

LICENSEES ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SAFETY-CONSCIOUS WORK

ENVIRONMENT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment

on several strategies it is considering for assuring that its

licensees establish and maintain a safety-conscious work

environment.

The Commission is evaluating the development of a

standardized approach that would:

1) Require licensees to establish and maintain a safetyconscious work environment with clearly defined attributes.

2) Establish certain indicators that may be monitored and

that, when considered collectively, may provide evidence of an

emerging adverse trend.

3) Outline specific remedial actions that the Commission may

require when it determines that a particular licensee has failed

to establish or maintain a safety-conscious work environment.

NRC now has a policy statement, "Freedom of Employees in the

Nuclear Industry to Raise Safety Concerns Without Fear of

Retaliation." Published last May, it was based on modified

recommendations of a team that reviewed the agency's program for

handling allegations of safety problems. But experience at the

Millstone nuclear power plant site in Waterford, Connecticut, as

well as at other regulated facilities suggests that additional

regulatory actions may be warranted when there is evidence that

the licensee may not be maintaining a safety-conscious work

environment.

Before proceeding further, the NRC is seeking comments and

suggestions on the various strategies being considered. Comments

should be mailed to: David Meyer, Chief, Rules Review and

Directives Branch, Division of Freedom of Information and
Publication Services, office of Administration, Mail Stop: T6D59,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555,

Written comments may also be hand-delivered to 11545 Rockville

Pike, Rockville, Maryland, between 7:45 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on

Federal workdays.

Comments may also be submitted electronically through the

NRC Electronic Bulletin Board on FedWorld. The request for

public comment has been published in the February 26 edition of

the Federal Register and has been posted on the NRC Homepage

under the Office of Enforcement (www.nrc.gov/oe/). Any proposed

rule developed as a result of comments received and deliberations

by NRC staff will be published in the Federal Register for public

comment before adoption in final form.

#
### §526. Applicability of administrative procedure provisions

The provisions of subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7, of title 5 shall be applicable to the issuance, amendment, or rescission of any rules or regulations, or any adjudication authorized or required pursuant to the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 86–257, title VI, §606, Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 540.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7, of title 5" substituted in text for "the Administrative Procedure Act" on authority of Pub. L. 89–554, §7(b), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 631, the first section of which enacted Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §2705. Identification and dissemination of best practices

#### (a) In general

#### (1) Information

The Secretary, in cooperation and after consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, shall assist workers, worker organizations, and employers in successfully adopting advanced workplace technologies, and advanced workplace practices by identifying, collecting, and disseminating information on best workplace practices and workplace assessment tools, including—

(A) methods, techniques, and successful models of labor-management cooperation and of worker and worker organization participation in the development, evaluation, selection, and implementation of new and advanced workplace technologies, and advanced workplace practices;

(B) methods, techniques, and successful models for the design and implementation of new and advanced workplace practices;

(C) methods, techniques, and successful models for the design and implementation of advanced forms of work organization; and

(D) methods, techniques, and successful models for the assessment of worker skills and training needs relating to the effective development, evaluation, selection, and implementation of advanced workplace technologies, and advanced workplace practices.

#### (2) Contents

Such information on best workplace practices shall include—

(A) summaries and analyses of best practice cases;

(B) criteria for assessment of current workplace practices; and

(C) information on the best available education and training materials and services relating to the development, implementation, and operation of systems utilizing new and advanced workplace technologies, and advanced workplace practices.

#### (b) Distribution

The information and materials developed under this section shall be distributed through an appropriate entity designated by the Secretary of Commerce to the Regional Centers for the Transfer of Manufacturing Technology, to the Manufacturing Outreach Center, to other technology training entities, and directly to others as determined appropriate by the Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of Commerce.

(Pub. L. 103–382, title V, §546, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4055.)
### §1827. Support and maintenance during emergencies

(a) During an emergency involving the safety of human life or the protection of property, as determined or declared by the Capitol Police Board, the Architect of the Capitol—

(1) may accept contributions of comfort and other incidental items and services to support employees of the Office of the Architect of the Capitol while such employees are on duty in response to the emergency; and

(2) may incur obligations and make expenditures out of available appropriations for meals, refreshments, and other support and maintenance for the Office of the Architect of the Capitol if, in the judgment of the Architect, such obligations and expenditures are necessary to respond to the emergency.

(b) This section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2010 and each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 111–68, div. A, title I, §1305, Oct. 1, 2009, 123 Stat. 2035.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2010, which is div. A of Pub. L. 111–68.
<page>                                    EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter World
Currency Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin
Perry, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:  /s/Kevin Perry

Name:	   Kevin Perry
Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date:	May 15, 2006
First Department,

October, 1943.

(October 1, 1943.)

#### Harriett C. Diffley, Respondent, *v.*George F. Diffley, Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

The parties had been married twenty-seven years when this action was instituted; during the times in question they continuously had their joint family residence and home together in the same apartment in a two-family house; defendant has been paying the plaintiff $45 weekly; the case is on the calendar and will shortly be reached for trial, and defendant doubtless will not refuse to provide reasonable support of his wife and child until the trial. On ^,11 the facts and circumstances disclosed we conclude that the order appealed from should be reversed without costs and the motion for alimony and counsel fees denied on condition that defendant consents that the case be tried when reached in its regular order without any unreasonable delay.

Present-—Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Untermyer, J., dissents and votes to modify by reducing the alimony to $35 per week and counsel fee to $350.

Order reversed, without costs, and the motion for alimony and counsel fee denied on condition that defendant consents that the case be tried when reached in its regular order without any unreasonable delay.
No: II-23-019 May 18, 2023 

Contact: Dave Gasperson, 404-997-4417 

NRC Schedules Public Meeting to Discuss

VC Summer Nuclear Power Plant Performance

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a hybrid public meeting May 25 to 

discuss the 2022 safety performance of the Virgil C. Summer nuclear power plant. The plant, which 

is located in Jenkinsville, South Carolina, is operated by Dominion Energy. 

The meeting will be held from 5:30-6:30 p.m. Eastern time at the McCrorey-Liston School 

of Technology, 1978 State Hwy 215 in Blair, South Carolina. The public can also access the 

meeting via Microsoft Teams or by phone. The telephone conference number is 301-576-2978, 

passcode 397871015#. NRC staff responsible for plant inspections, including the resident inspectors 

based full-time at the site, will be available to answer questions at the meeting. 

The NRC concluded that VC Summer operated safely in 2022. However, the plant has been 

under increased NRC oversight since January 2022 for a finding related to an inoperable emergency 

diesel generator. During a March 2023 inspection, the NRC confirmed that the plant corrected that 

issue. The plant remains under increased NRC oversight for an unrelated September 2022 securityrelated issue. The NRC has scheduled an additional inspection in June 2023 to independently verify 

that the plant has taken sufficient corrective actions to address the second problem.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, equal

with the safety significance of the issues involved. If an inspection finding or performance indicator 

has more than a very low safety significance, the NRC increases its oversight.

The annual assessment letter for the VC Summer plant, including upcoming inspection 

plans, is available on the NRC website. Current performance information for the site is available on 

the NRC website and updated quarterly.
ARTHUR COLLIN CHERRY , Appellant,

v. KATHERINE HIETT VIKER , Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D 16

- 689

_____________________________/ Opinion filed September 6 , 2016. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Robert Wheeler , Judge

. M. Stephen Stanfield, Gainesville , for Appellant.
Emilian “ I an” Bucataru, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CUR IAM. In this appeal of a non

- final order awarding temporary attorney’ s fees and suit money to Appellee in a child support and custody case , Appellant contends that the trial court’s order is not supported by competent, substantial evidence. We
agree to th e extent that the trial court’s findings regarding the parties’ financial2 resources a re not supported by the evidence because only argument of counsel

– and no evidence

– was presented at the hearing below

. Thus, the court could not have properly determine d the need of the party seeking fees or the ability of the other party to pay. See Giovanini v. Giovanini , 89 So. 3d 280, 282 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (“An award of attorney’s fees pursuant to section 61.16 must be based on the need of the party seeking the fee s and the ability of the other party to pay the fees.”). Accordingly , we reverse and remand for a new hearing. See Baker v. Baker , 35 So. 3d 76, 77

- 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (reversing and remanding an award of temporary fees where party seeking fee award fail ed to produce evidence to support the award because “a temporary award does not create vested rights”)

. By this disposition, we expressly decline to reach the issue of whether the record supports the amounts of suit money and attorney’s fees awarded by the trial court

. REVERSED AND REMANDED.
LEWIS , WETHERELL , and RAY , J J

. , CONCUR.
#### § 6.57 Judicial review.

Within 2 years of receipt of a final administrative determination as provided in § 6.34 or § 6.55, a requestor may seek judicial review of that determination. A civil action must be filed in the Federal District Court in which the requestor resides or has his or her principal place of business or in which the agency records are situated, or in the District of Columbia.
-cr-06219-WDF Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2000 P
Exhibit 32.2


                               ESCALA GROUP, INC.
                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Escala Group, Inc. for
the period ended September 30, 2005, I, Larry Crawford, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of Escala Group, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.    this Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended September
      30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Escala Group, Inc.


Dated:   November 8, 2005
                                    /s/ Larry Crawford
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Larry Crawford, Executive Vice President
                                    and Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.591 Filing procedures. ( a ) *Place of filing.* A post-importation claim for a refund must be filed with CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically.
( b ) *Contents of claim.* A post-importation claim for a refund must be filed by presentation of the following: ( 1 ) A written declaration stating that the good qualified as an originating good at the time of importation and setting forth the number and date of the entry or entries covering the good;
( 2 ) A copy of a certification prepared in accordance with § 10.584 of this subpart if a certification forms the basis for the claim, or other information demonstrating that the good qualifies for preferential tariff treatment;
( 3 ) A written statement indicating whether the importer of the good provided a copy of the entry summary or equivalent documentation to any other person. If such documentation was so provided, the statement must identify each recipient by name, CBP identification number, and address and must specify the date on which the documentation was provided; and
( 4 ) A written statement indicating whether or not any person has filed a protest relating to the good under any provision of law; and if any such protest has been filed, the statement must identify the protest by number and date.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5266 

To reauthorize the program for infant and early childhood mental health 

promotion, intervention, and treatment. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 15, 2022 

Mr. KAINE (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the program for infant and early childhood 

mental health promotion, intervention, and treatment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Investing in Infant 

5 and Early Childhood Mental Health Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INFANT AND EARLY CHILDHOOD MENTAL HEALTH 

7 PROMOTION, INTERVENTION, AND TREAT8 MENT. 

9 Section 399Z–2 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

10 U.S.C. 280h–6) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5266 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as sub2 section (g); 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(f) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.—The Secretary may, 

6 directly or by awarding grants or contracts to public and 

7 private nonprofit entities, provide training and technical 

8 assistance to eligible entities described in (d).’’; and 

9 (3) in subsection (g), as so redesignated, by 

10 striking ‘‘$20,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 

11 2018 through 2022’’ and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000 for 

12 the period of fiscal years 2023 through 2027’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.920 Accessories, spare parts, or tools. ( a ) *General.* Accessories, spare parts, or tools that are delivered with a good and that form part of the good's standard accessories, spare parts, or tools will be treated as originating goods if the good is an originating good, and will be disregarded in determining whether all the non-originating materials used in the production of the good undergo an applicable change in tariff classification specified in General Note 32(n), HTSUS, provided that: ( 1 ) The accessories, spare parts, or tools are classified with, and not invoiced separately from, the good, regardless of whether they are specified or separately identified in the invoice for the good; and
( 2 ) The quantities and value of the accessories, spare parts, or tools are customary for the good.
( b ) *Regional value content.* If the good is subject to a regional value content requirement, the value of the accessories, spare parts, or tools is taken into account as originating or non-originating materials, as the case may be, in calculating the regional value content of the good under § 10.915 of this subpart.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-99-06 January 26, 1999

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC RESCHEDULES MEETING FOR FEBRUARY 5 TO DISCUSS FINDINGS

OF INSPECTION INTO DEC. 9 FIRE AT PORTSMOUTH URANIUM PLANT

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspection team will meet

February 5 with U. S. Enrichment Corporation officials in

Piketon, Ohio, to discuss the preliminary findings of its review

of a December 9 fire at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant.

The meeting, previously scheduled for January 8, had been

postponed because of severe weather.

The plant, which processes uranium for use as fuel for

nuclear power plants, is located at Piketon, Ohio.

The meeting will be at 12 noon in the Piketon Research and

Extension Center, Ohio State University, 1864 Skyville Road,

Piketon. It is open to public observation. NRC Deputy Regional

Administrator James Caldwell and other NRC staff members will be

available after the meeting to answer questions from the news

media and members of the public.

The fire occurred in the portion of the plant which removes

extraneous gases from the processing system. It appeared to

result from the overheating of metal components which ignited the

uranium hexafluoride in the processing system.

The plant fire brigade extinguished the fire. There were

minor injuries to two plant workers and two fire fighters.

Environmental surveys showed no evidence of a release of uranium

outside the immediate area of the process building.

The NRC team, called an Augmented Inspection Team, will

issue a written report in early February. The team's findings

were summarized in a Preliminary Notification issued on January

13. This summary is available on the NRC's internet web site at:

<http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/pn/pn39858b.htm> and from the NRC Region

III Office of Public Affairs.

The written report will be also posted on the NRC web site

at: <http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports>.
#####