alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. June Gail McKEEHAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-30624.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

Rene I. Salomon, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Middle District of Louisiana, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Rebecca L. Hudsmith, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

June Gail McKeehan, New Orleans, LA, Pro Se.

*328Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent June Gail McKeehan has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). McKeehan has not filed a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. We decline to address any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, without prejudice to McKeehan’s right to assert such claims in a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. *See United States v. Brewster,*137 F.3d 853, 859 (5th Cir.1998). Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
SCI 001710

CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-149 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The invention listed below is assigned to the United States Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and is available for licensing by the Department of the Navy. Patent application 10/943,648: Integrated Radar Optical Surveillance and Sighting System, a protection system integrating subsystems which may be controlled by non-proprietary, open architecture software, which, in turn, may accommodate the commonly known “plug and play” capability. The system can incorporate a variety of lethal (or less-than-lethal) weapon payloads as well as a variety of sensors and detectors; thereby providing the user with an integrated system solution capable of providing an enhanced situational awareness capability. 

# ADDRESSES:

Requests for copies of the invention cited should be directed to the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code 054, Bldg 1, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Brian Bailey, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code 054, Bldg 1, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001, telephone (812) 

                        854-2378. To download an application for license, see:                         *www.crane.navy.mil/​newscommunity/​techtrans_​CranePatents.asp.*

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404) 

Dated: October 8, 2004. 

J.H. Wagshul, 

Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-23409 Filed 10-19-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
#### Louis Kalman, Respondent, v. Mollie B. Kalman, Appellant.

*716In our opinion the determination in favor of respondent was contrary to the weight of the evidence. Further, the admission of evidence that upon the trial of the divorce action, the court had remarked that the testimony of appellant and her witnesses had been “ given with the intent of deceiving the Court ” and that their testimony was “ rejected as untrue and not worthy of belief ”, was not conducive to a fair and impartial appraisal of appellant’s testimony upon the present trial. Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Carswell, Acting P. J., and Johnston, J., dissent and vote to affirm on the authority of *Tiedemann*v. *Tiedemann*(201 App. Div. 614, affd. 236 N. Y. 534) and *Boyd*v. *Boyd*(252 N. Y. 422). [See *post,*p. 770.]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


              CAMBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS (MASSACHUSETTS), INC.
             STATEMENTS REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                      Three Months Ended September 30,    Nine Months Ended September 30,
                                      --------------------------------    -------------------------------
                                          1996                1995           1996             1995
                                      ------------       -------------    ------------     --------------
<S>                                   <C>                 <C>              <C>             <C>
 
Net income                              $ 5,241              $ 3,138         $14,042             $ 9,070
                                        =======              =======         =======             =======
 
Pro forma net income                    $ 5,241              $ 3,031         $14,042             $ 8,855
                                        =======              =======         =======             =======
 
 
Weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding               45,880               43,899          45,537              43,623
 
Dilutive effect of common
 equivalent shares of stock
 options and warrants                     7,978                6,639           7,247               6,267
                                        -------              -------         -------             -------
 
Weighted average number of
 common and common
 equivalent shares outstanding            53,858              50,538          52,784              49,890
                                         =======             =======         =======             =======
 
Net income per share (1)                 $   .10             $   .06         $   .27             $   .18
                                         =======             =======         =======             =======
 
Pro forma net income per share (1)       $   .10             $   .06         $   .27             $   .18
                                         =======             =======         =======             =======
 
</TABLE>
    (1)  Primary and fully diluted income per share are the same for each
         periods presented.

                                      24
Exhibit
      32.1





Ener1,
      Inc.


500
      West
      Cypress Creek Road-Suite 100


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309





May
      24,
      2006





Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549





Re:
      Certification Of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350





Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
      connection with the accompanying Amendment No. 3 to Quarterly Report on Form
      10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Ronald Stewart, Chief Executive
      Officer of Ener1, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1)
            such
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended
                September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and








2)
            the
                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
                Ener1,
                Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents,
                in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                Ener1, Inc.








/s/
                Ronald Stewart
              
              Ronald
                Stewart
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer and
              Duly
                Authorized Officer)











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
      retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.





This
      certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to Ener1, Inc.`s
      quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
      to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
      reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
      except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
      filing.
### SUBCHAPTER II—STATEWIDE AND LOCAL WORKFORCE INVESTMENT SYSTEMS
§ 204.63 Allowable costs. 2 CFR part 200, subpart E—Cost Principles establishes general policies for determining allowable costs. ( a ) FEMA will reimburse direct costs for the administration of a fire management assistance grant under 2 CFR part 200.
( b ) FEMA will reimburse indirect costs for the administration of a fire management assistance grant in compliance with the recipient's approved indirect cost rate under 2 CFR part 200.
( c ) Management costs as defined in 44 CFR part 207 do not apply to this section.
[79 FR 76085, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 82 FR 42, Jan. 3, 2017]
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-91 October 22, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $50,000 FINE AGAINST NORTHERN STATES POWER

FOR EQUIPMENT TESTING VIOLATIONS AT PRAIRIE ISLAND PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $50,000 fine against

Northern States Power Company for violations of NRC requirements in the testing of

equipment at the Prairie Island Nuclear Power Station. The two-unit plant is located at

Red Wing, Minnesota.

An NRC inspection in April through June found inadequacies in the testing of the

auxiliary feedwater system at the plant. This system is a backup source of cooling

water for the steam generators at the plant and would be needed under certain accident

conditions.

The NRC inspectors determined that testing procedures would permit an

auxiliary feedwater pump to be considered operable even if it did not meet its minimum

design requirements. The utility staff had never compared the testing criteria, which

met industry standards, with the actual minimum system design requirements for the

pump.

A second violation found by the inspectors involved the plant staff's failure to

correct the auxiliary feedwater system design documents when discrepancies in system

flow requirements were found in 1992.

The safety significance of the violations was low, because the auxiliary feedwater

system always met the minimum design requirements.

The plant staff had found a similar problem in 1991 with the testing criteria for

another plant safety system and that problem was corrected.

"The engineering staff did not take prompt correct action [at that time] to identify

that this problem also existed in the auxiliary feedwater system testing program," said

NRC Regional Administrator A. Bill Beach in notifying the utility of the fine.

"If the plant staff had implemented broader corrective action, it is likely this

[auxiliary feedwater] violation would not have occurred," he added.

Northern States Power has until November 17 to pay the fine or to protest it. If
the fine is protested and subsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the utility may request

a hearing.
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: For additional information, see related documents published at 47 FR 57369, Dec. 23, 1982; 48 FR 17101, Apr. 21, 1983; and 48 FR 29096, June 24, 1983.

§ 4.8 How does the Administrator provide an opportunity to comment on proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development? ( a ) Except in unusual circumstances, the Administrator gives state processes or directly affected State, areawide, regional and local officials and entities at least 60 days from the date established by the Administrator to comment on proposed direct Federal development or Federal financial assistance.
( b ) This section also applies to comments in cases in which the review, coordination, and communication with FEMA have been delegated.
( c ) Applicants for programs and activities subject to section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Act shall allow areawide agencies a 60-day opportunity for review and comment.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-96 August 18, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC STAFF NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT BEAVER VALLEY

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of

Prussia, Pa., have selected Geoffrey A. Wertz as the new

resident inspector at the Beaver Valley nuclear power plant in

Shippingport, Pa. He joins Senior Resident Inspector David

Kern and Resident Inspector Glenn Dentel.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two

NRC resident inspectors. They serve as the agency’s eyes and

ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major

work projects and interfacing with plant workers and the

public.

Mr. Wertz joined the NRC in January as a reactor

engineer in the Region I Division of Reactor Projects. Prior

to joining the agency, he worked for 14 years at Carolina Power

& Light Company’s Brunswick plant. During that time, he held

various management positions in the engineering and maintenance

organizations.

Mr. Wertz earned a master’s degree in business

administration from the University of North Carolina at

Wilmington, a master’s degree in nuclear engineering from the

University of Virginia and a bachelor’s degree in physics from

the College of William and Mary. He is a registered

professional engineer in the State of North Carolina.

Mr. Wertz, his wife and three children live in Beaver,

Pa.

The resident inspectors at Beaver Valley can be

reached at (724) 643-2000.

#
Exhibit 10.3


 


SHIFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 


2020 OMNIBUS EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN


 


AMENDMENT TO RSU AGREEMENT


 


THIS
AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is made to that certain RSU Agreement dated February 2, 2021, between Shift Technologies,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Tobias Russell (“Grantee”) (the “RSU
Agreement). This Amendment is effective April 5, 2021 (the “Amendment Effective Date”). All capitalized terms used
herein that are not otherwise defined have the same meaning given to them in the Plan or the RSU Agreement, as applicable.


 


As of the Amendment Effective
Date, the parties to the RSU Agreement, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, agree to the
following changes to the RSU Agreement. This Amendment rescinds and cancels 1,044,272 RSUs as set forth below.


 


 1. Section 1 is amended to replace “3,044,272” with “2,000,000.”




 


2. Section
2 is amended to replace “2,283,204” with “1,238,932.”


 


3.  283,204
unvested Time RSUs granted pursuant to Section 2(a)(i)(a) are rescinded and cancelled, such that the 1,238,932 aggregate Time RSUs granted
pursuant to such Section 2(a)(i)(a) (as amended) shall vest or have vested, as applicable, in accordance with the following schedule:


 


	190,267	 	Jan. 12, 2021
	190,267	 	Apr. 12, 2021
	190,267	 	Jul. 12, 2021
	190,267	 	Oct. 12, 2021
	190,267	 	Jan. 12, 2022
	190,267	 	Apr. 12, 2022
	97,330	 	Jul. 31, 2022


 


4. The
entire 761,068 Time RSU grant pursuant to Section 2(a)(i)(b) is rescinded and cancelled.


 


5. The
remainder of the RSU Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


[SIGNATURE LINES ON NEXT PAGE]


 




     


     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officer to execute this Amendment, and the Grantee has placed his
or her signature hereon, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.


 


SHIFT TECHNOLOGIES,
INC. 


 


	By:	/s/ George Arison	 
	 	Signature	 
	 	 	 
	Name:	George Arison	 
	 	 	 
	Title:	Co-Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 
	Date:	April 5, 2021	 


 


I hereby agree to the
terms of this Amendment. I further agree that all of the decisions and interpretations of the Company with respect thereto shall be final
and binding.


 


 


	GRANTEE:	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Tobias Russell	 
	 	Signature	 
	 	 	 
	Name:	Tobias Russell	 
	 	Print Name
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001046183
<NAME>                        Union Community Bancorp
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         32
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         6,159
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         8,026
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           8,175
<LOANS>                                        91,262
<ALLOWANCE>                                    362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,162
<DEPOSITS>                                     64,846
<SHORT-TERM>                                   297
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            992
<LONG-TERM>                                    1,496
<COMMON>                                       28,193
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 108,162
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                6,932
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              514
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               659
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               8,105
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             3,364
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,415
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          4,690
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  110
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,069
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     3,069
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,974
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .70
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.40
<LOANS-NON>                                    349
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                491
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               252
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  0
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              362
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           362
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        67
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417

No.: II-97-47 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Tuesday, June 24, 1997)

Roger Hannah 404-331-7878

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT NORTH ANNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have announced the

assignment of Michael Morgan as the agency's Senior Resident Inspector at the

North Anna nuclear power plant, located near Mineral, Virginia.

Before joining the NRC, Morgan was an operator instructor with Consumers

Power in Michigan and a simulator instructor with Westinghouse in Illinois.

Morgan joined the NRC in 1986 as an operator examiner in the NRC’s Region II

office in Atlanta. He has also served a resident inspector at the Farley and

Browns Ferry nuclear plants, both in Alabama. He received a Bachelor's degree in

physical sciences from the University of the State of New York in Albany. He also

received degrees in reactor technology and biological science from Joliet Junior

College in Joliet, Illinois and Ferris State College in Big Rapids, Michigan.

Morgan joins NRC Resident Inspector Russell Gibbs. The NRC inspectors at

the North Anna plant can be reached at 540-894-5421.