alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 19.535 Effect of state or local law or other requirements. ( a ) *Prohibitory requirements.* The obligation to comply with §§ 19.500 through 19.550 is not obviated or alleviated by the existence of any State or local law or other requirement that imposes prohibitions or limits upon employment of members of one sex that are not imposed upon members of the other sex.
( b ) *Benefits.* A recipient that provides any compensation, service, or benefit to members of one sex pursuant to a State or local law or other requirement shall provide the same compensation, service, or benefit to members of the other sex.
#### § 130.500 Funding.

See 2 CFR 200.305.

[88 FR 76647, Nov. 7, 2023]
Exhibit 10.1


 





LETTER AGREEMENT


 


April 1, 2021


 


Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc.


6300 Lamar Avenue


Overland Park, Kansas 66202


Attention: General Counsel


   Associate General Counsel


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


Reference is hereby made to
that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 2, 2020 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Macquarie
Management Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), Merry Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a
wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and (solely
for purposes of Section 9.15 therein) Macquarie Financial Holdings Pty Ltd, an Australian proprietary company formed under the
laws of the Commonwealth of Australia. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings given to them in
the Merger Agreement.


 


In accordance with Section
2.2 of the Merger Agreement, Parent and the Company hereby agree that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Merger
Agreement, the Closing will take place at 10:00 a.m. on the later of (a) the third (3rd) Business Day following the satisfaction
or waiver of the conditions set forth in Article VII of the Merger Agreement (other than those conditions that by their nature cannot
be satisfied until the Closing, but subject to the satisfaction or, to the extent permitted by Law, waiver thereof at the Closing), and
(b) April 30, 2021.


 


[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]


 






    1 


     


    

 











If the above correctly reflects
your understanding and agreement with respect to the foregoing matters, please so confirm by signing the enclosed copy of this Letter
Agreement in the space provided below.


 


Yours faithfully,


 


	MACQUARIE MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, INC.	 
	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Shawn K. Lytle	 
	 	Name: Shawn K. Lytle	 
	 	Title: President	 




 


Acknowledged and agreed as of the date first above
written:


 


	WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.	 
	 	 
	By:  	 /s/ Philip J. Sanders	 
	 	Name: Philip J. Sanders	 
		Title: Chief Executive Officer	 




 


[Signature page to Letter Agreement]
-cr-06219-WDF Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/03/2001 P
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.887 Verification and justification of claim for preferential treatment. ( a ) *Verification.* A claim for preferential treatment made under § 10.863 or § 10.870 of this subpart, including any declaration or other information submitted to CBP in support of the claim, will be subject to such verification as the Center director deems necessary. In the event that the Center director is provided with insufficient information to verify or substantiate the claim, the Center director may deny the claim for preferential treatment.
( b ) *Applicable accounting principles.* When conducting a verification of origin to which Generally Accepted Accounting Principles may be relevant, CBP will apply and accept the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles applicable in the country of production.
U.S. 200 NM Limit

82°W

82°W

80°W

80°W

78°W

78°W

76°W

76°W

74°W

74°W

72°W

72°W

70°W

70°W

68°W

68°W

66°W

66°W

24°N 24°N

26°N 26°N

28°N 28°N

30°N 30°N

32°N 32°N

34°N 34°N

36°N 36°N

38°N 38°N

40°N 40°N

42°N 42°N

44°N 44°N

46°N 46°N

U.S. 200 NM Limit

82°W

82°W

80°W

80°W

78°W

78°W

76°W

76°W

74°W

74°W

72°W

72°W

70°W

70°W

68°W

68°W

66°W

66°W

24°N 24°N

26°N 26°N

28°N 28°N

30°N 30°N

32°N 32°N

34°N 34°N

36°N 36°N

38°N 38°N

40°N 40°N

42°N 42°N

44°N 44°N

46°N 46°N

Note:

The Maritime boundaries and limits shown above

are for initial planning purposes only and do not

prejudice or affect United States jurisdiction in

any way.

ME

VT

NH

NY

MA

PA

NJ

CT RI

DE

MD

WV

VA

NC

SC

GA

FL

New Administrative Boundaries

U.S. 200 NM Limit

Boundary Turning Points

ATLANTIC STATE OFFSHORE ADMINISTRATIVE

BOUNDARIES (PRELIMINARY)

LEGEND

December, 2005

Projection Geographic

North American Datum 1983

0 50 100 150 200 Statute Miles

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Kilometers

STATE OFFSHORE ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES

ATLANTIC REGION

The Administrative boundaries shown

on this map have been computed with

the latest National Baseline, except for

Georgia which is still in the process of

being re-computed. All coordinate values

are pending final review. The Administrative

boundaries have been clipped at each

end by the Submerged Lands Act (SLA)

boundary and the U.S. 200 NM Limit,

and will ambulate with them.
§ 333.50 General provisions. ( a ) FEMA may, from time-to-time, take specific official actions to implement or enforce the provisions of this part.
( b ) Some of these official actions (rating authorizations and letters and memoranda of understanding) are discussed in this subpart. Official actions that pertain to compliance (administrative subpoenas, demands for information, and inspection authorizations) are discussed in § 333.61(c). Directives are discussed in § 333.52.
§ 111.12 Application for license. ( a ) *Submission of application and fee.* An application for a broker's license must be timely submitted to the processing Center after the applicant attains a passing grade on the examination. The application must be executed on CBP Form 3124. The application must be accompanied by the application fee prescribed in § 111.96(a) and one copy of the appropriate attachment required by the application form (Articles of Agreement or an affidavit signed by all partners, Articles of Agreement of the association, or the Articles of Incorporation). If the applicant proposes to operate under a trade or fictitious name in one or more States, evidence of the applicant's authority to use the name in each of those States must accompany the application. The application, application fee and any additional documentation as required above may be submitted to a CBP-authorized electronic data interchange (EDI) system. If a CBP-authorized EDI system is not available, then the information must be submitted in writing to the processing Center. An application for an individual license must be submitted within the 3-year period after the applicant took and passed the examination referred to in §§ 111.11(a)(4) and 111.13. The processing Center may require an individual applicant to provide a copy of the notification that the applicant passed the examination (*see* § 111.13(e)) and will require the applicant to submit fingerprints at the time of the interview. The processing Center may reject an application as improperly filed if the application is incomplete or, if on its face, the application demonstrates that one or more of the basic requirements set forth in § 111.11 has not been met at the time of filing; in either case the application and fee will be returned to the filer without further action.
( b ) *Withdrawal of application.* An applicant for a broker's license may withdraw the application at any time prior to issuance of the license by providing written notice of the withdrawal to the processing Center or through a CBP-authorized EDI system, if available. However, withdrawal of the application does not entitle the applicant to a refund of the application fee set forth in § 111.96(a).
[CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63313, Oct. 18, 2022]
#### § 59.3 Emergency program.

The 1968 Act required a risk study to be undertaken for each community before it could become eligible for the sale of flood insurance. Since this requirement resulted in a delay in providing insurance, the Congress, in section 408 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91-152, December 24, 1969), established an Emergency Flood Insurance Program as a new section 1336 of the National Flood Insurance Act (42 U.S.C. 4056) to permit the early sale of insurance in flood-prone communities. The emergency program does not affect the requirement that a community must adopt adequate flood plain management regulations pursuant to part 60 of this subchapter but permits insurance to be sold before a study is conducted to determine risk premium rates for the community. The program still requires upon the effective date of a FIRM the charging of risk premium rates for all new construction and substantial improvements and for higher limits of coverage for existing structures.

[43 FR 7140, Feb. 17, 1978. Redesignated at 44 FR 31177, May 31, 1979, and amended at 48 FR 44543, Sept. 29, 1983]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2004)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 5480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2348]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Part 52

[FAR Case 2002-024 Correction]
RIN 9000-AJ80


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Electronic Representations and 
Certifications; Correction

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense 
Acquisition Regulations Council are issuing a correction to the 
proposed rule issued as FAR case 2002-024, Electronic Representations 
and Certifications, to correct an amendatory instruction.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Laurie Duarte at (202) 501-4755, 
General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat, Washington, DC 
20405.

Correction

    In the proposed rule document appearing at 69 FR 4012, January 27, 
2004, on page 4015, first column, amendatory instruction 9 is corrected 
to read as follows: ``Amend section 52.212-3 by revising the date of 
the provision; adding an introductory paragraph; and adding paragraph 
(j) to read as follows:''

    Dated: January 29, 2004.
Ralph De Stefano,
Acting Director, Acquisition Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 04-2348 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.1034 Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in Korea. ( a ) *General.* This section sets forth the rules which apply for purposes of obtaining duty-free treatment on goods returned after repair or alteration in Korea as provided for in subheadings 9802.00.40 and 9802.00.50, HTSUS. Goods returned after having been repaired or altered in Korea, regardless of whether the repair or alteration could be performed in the United States or has increased the value of the good and regardless of their origin, are eligible for duty-free treatment, provided that the requirements of this section are met. For purposes of this section, “repairs or alterations” means restoration, addition, renovation, re-dyeing, cleaning, re-sterilizing, or other treatment that does not destroy the essential characteristics of, or create a new or commercially different good from, the good exported from the United States.
( b ) *Goods not eligible for duty-free treatment after repair or alteration.* The duty-free treatment referred to in paragraph (a) of this section will not apply to goods which, in their condition as exported from the United States to Korea, are incomplete for their intended use and for which the processing operation performed in Korea constitutes an operation that is performed as a matter of course in the preparation or manufacture of finished goods.
( c ) *Documentation.* The provisions of § 10.8(a), (b), and (c) of this part, relating to the documentary requirements for goods entered under subheading 9802.00.40 or 9802.00.50, HTSUS, will apply in connection with the entry of goods which are returned from Korea after having been exported for repairs or alterations and which are claimed to be duty free.
Exhibit 23
                               PUGH & COMPANY, P.C.
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
  WILL J. PUGH, CPA
  RONNIE G. CATE, CPA     HOME FEDERAL PLAZA - SUITE 200             MEMBERS
  C. LARRY ELMORE, CPA     315 NORTH CEDAR BLUFF ROAD
  W. JAMES PUGH, JR., CPA  KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE 37923      AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF
  DANIEL C. FRANKLIN, CPA        ___________        CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
  P. RICK HINCHEY, CPA
  JAMES H. JONES, CPA           P.O. BOX 31409              TENNESSEE SOCIETY OF
  LISA W. HILL, CPA        KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE     CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
  SUSAN R. FOARD, CPA             37930-1409
                            865-769-0660 800-332-7021
                            TELECOPIER 865-769-1660

-
                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
United Tennessee Bankshares, Inc.
Newport, Tennessee

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statement  (No.
333-41571 and 333-82803) on Form S-8 of United Tennessee Bankshares, Inc. of our
report  dated  March  13,  2003,  relating  to the  consolidated  statements  of
financial  condition of United Tennessee  Bankshares,  Inc. and subsidiary as of
December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related  consolidated  statements of income,
comprehensive  income,  changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the  three-year  period ended  December  31, 2002,  which report
appears  in the  December  31,  2002  annual  report  on Form  10-KSB  of United
Tennessee Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiary.


                                            /s/ Pugh & Company, P.C.

                                            Certified Public Accountants
                                            Knoxville, Tennessee
                                            March 25, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.726 Supporting statement not required. ( a ) *General.* Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an importer will not be required to submit a supporting statement under § 10.724 for: ( 1 ) A non-commercial importation of a good; or
( 2 ) A commercial importation for which the value of the originating goods does not exceed U.S. $2,500.
( b ) *Exception.* If the port director determines that an importation described in paragraph (a) of this section may reasonably be considered to have been carried out or planned for the purpose of evading compliance with the rules and procedures governing claims for preference under the AFTA, the port director will notify the importer that for that importation the importer must submit to CBP a supporting statement. The importer must submit such a statement within 30 days from the date of the notice. Failure to timely submit the supporting statement will result in denial of the claim for preferential tariff treatment.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.827 Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in Bahrain. ( a ) *General.* This section sets forth the rules that apply for purposes of obtaining duty-free treatment on goods returned after repair or alteration in Bahrain as provided for in subheadings 9802.00.40 and 9802.00.50, HTSUS. Goods returned after having been repaired or altered in Bahrain, whether or not pursuant to a warranty, are eligible for duty-free treatment, provided that the requirements of this section are met. For purposes of this section, “repairs or alterations” means restoration, addition, renovation, re-dyeing, cleaning, re-sterilizing, or other treatment which does not destroy the essential characteristics of, or create a new or commercially different good from, the good exported from the United States.
( b ) *Goods not eligible for treatment.* The duty-free treatment referred to in paragraph (a) of this section will not apply to goods which, in their condition as exported from the United States to Bahrain, are incomplete for their intended use and for which the processing operation performed in Bahrain constitutes an operation that is performed as a matter of course in the preparation or manufacture of finished goods.
( c ) *Documentation.* The provisions of paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of § 10.8 of this part, relating to the documentary requirements for goods entered under subheading 9802.00.40 or 9802.00.50, HTSUS, will apply in connection with the entry of goods which are returned from Bahrain after having been exported for repairs or alterations and which are claimed to be duty free.
§ 113.4 Bonds and carnets. ( a ) *Bonds.* All bonds required to be given under the customs laws or CBP regulations will be known as CBP bonds.
( b ) *Carnets.* A carnet is an international customs document which serves simultaneously as a customs entry document and as a customs bond. Therefore, carnets, provided for in part 114 of this chapter, are ordinarily acceptable without posting further security under the customs laws or CBP regulations requiring bonds.
[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-15, 80 FR 70163, Nov. 13, 2015]
### §1803. Delegation of authority

The Architect of the Capitol may delegate the duties and authorities of the Architect to officers and employees of the Office of the Architect of the Capitol, as the Architect determines appropriate.

(Aug. 5, 1955, ch. 568, 69 Stat. 515; Pub. L. 108–7, div. H, title I, §1205, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 375; Pub. L. 116–260, div. O, title VII, §701(a), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2154.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 163b of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1956.

#### Amendments

2020—Pub. L. 116–260 substituted "delegate the duties and authorities of the Architect to officers and employees of the Office of the Architect of the Capitol, as the Architect determines appropriate" for "delegate to the assistants of the Architect such authority of the Architect as the Architect may determine proper, except those authorities, duties, and responsibilities specifically assigned to the Deputy Architect of the Capitol by the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2003".

2003—Pub. L. 108–7 substituted "Architect of the Capitol may delegate to the assistants of the Architect such authority of the Architect as the Architect may determine proper, except those authorities, duties, and responsibilities specifically assigned to the Deputy Architect of the Capitol by the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2003" for "Architect of the Capitol is authorized on and after August 5, 1955, to delegate to the Assistant Architect and other assistants such authority of the Architect as he may deem proper".
**Exhibit** **31.1**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
 Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, James
A. Coyne, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PLM Equipment Growth &
Income Fund VII (the
Registrant).
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly
report.
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
 
 4.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 
 a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  disclosed
in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 5.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.
 
 
 
 
 Date:
November 11, 2005  By:  /s/
James A. Coyne
 James A.
Coyne
 President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI-DADE DIVISION 

--------------------------------------------------------------------- x

Case No. 20-cv-22957 

(RNS/EGT)

SCANZ TECHNOLOGIES, INC. fka EQUITYFEED 

CORPORATION, a Canadian (Quebec) Corporation,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JEWMON ENTERPRISES, LLC, et al., 

 Defendants. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: 

:

--------------------------------------------------------------------- x

DECLARATION OF STEVEN R. CAMPBELL IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 

I, Steven R. Campbell, declare as follows: 

1. I am a Partner at Alston & Bird LLP, counsel for Defendants JewMon Enterprises, LLC, 

Millionaire Media, LLC, Millionaire Publishing, LLC, and Timothy Sykes in the abovecaptioned matter. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in New York, Georgia, and 

Tennessee and am admitted pro hac vice in the above-captioned matter. This Declaration 

is made upon personal knowledge and is in support of Defendants’ Reply Memorandum of 

Law in Further Support of Their Motion for Sanctions. 

2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 18 is a composite of certain Slack messages produced to 

Defendants in the above-captioned matter by non-party Josh Andrews on June 22, 2021. 

Passwords and Mr. Andrews’ phone number have been redacted by Defendants. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: June 29, 2021 /s/ Steven R. Campbell 

 Steven R. Campbell 

Case 1:20-cv-22957-RNS Document 168 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/29/2021 Page 1 of 1