alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SWEPI/Carson i] Los Angeles

County
ARCO/Carson ll Orange
Long Beach
TEXACOMWilmington ll 9 ¥ County
pes
SAGISSO :
ea White vy Seal Beach
San Pedro IS eS
San Pedro Freemen”\
Bay
Huntington

arek

State 186 Beach

Waters / 3095

Boundary

300 |301 \

306

San Pedro
Bay
OCS Operations

HES 131/03
### §3302. Insolvency

(a) In General.—Except as provided in subsection (c), a debtor is insolvent if the sum of the debtor's debts is greater than all of the debtor's assets at a fair valuation.

(b) Presumption.—A debtor who is generally not paying debts as they become due is presumed to be insolvent.

(c) Calculation.—A partnership is insolvent under subsection (a) if the sum of the partnership's debts is greater than the aggregate, at a fair valuation, of—

(1) all of the partnership's assets; and

(2) the sum of the excess of the value of each general partner's non-partnership assets over the partner's non-partnership debts.

(d) Assets.—For purposes of this section, assets do not include property that is transferred, concealed, or removed with intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors or that has been transferred in a manner making the transfer voidable under this subchapter.

(e) Debts.—For purposes of this section, debts do not include an obligation to the extent such obligation is secured by a valid lien on property of the debtor not included as an asset.

(Added Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVI, §3611, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4961.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Nov. 29, 1990, and applicable with respect to certain actions for debts owed the United States pending in court on that effective date, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101–647, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.
EXHIBIT 10



EXHIBIT 10.2



Clive de Larrabeiti

South Lodge, Pax Hill Park

Lindfield, West Sussex

U.K., RH16 2QY

Mayfair Mining & Minerals, Inc.

South Lodge, Pax Hill Park

Lindfield, West Sussex

U.K., RH16 2QY

I, Clive de Larrabeiti, hold in trust for Mayfair Mining & Minerals, Inc. a 100% undivided interest in six mineral claims, namely Silver Stone 1 (Tenure Number 301217), Silver Stone 2 (Tenure Number 301218), Silver Stone 3 (Tenure Number 301225), Silver Stone 4 (Tenure Number 301226), Silver Stone 5 (Tenure Number 301227) and Silver Stone 6 (Tenure Number 301228), located in the Slocan Mining District of British Columbia.

I will deliver full title on demand to Mayfair Mining & Minerals, Inc. for as long as the claims are in good standing with the Province of British Columbia.

/s/ "Clive de Larrabeiti"

Clive de Larrabeiti
#### Irving K. Baxter, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Motion No. 1284.)

—Motion for reargument denied; motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 839.]
§ 102.18 Rules of interpretation. ( a ) When General Rule of Interpretation (GRI) 2(a) is referred to in § 102.20 as an exception to an allowed change in tariff classification, this means that such change will not be acceptable for purposes of that section if the change results from the assembly of parts into an incomplete or unfinished good which is classifiable in the same manner as a complete or finished good pursuant to GRI 2(a).
( b ) ( 1 ) For purposes of identifying the material that imparts the essential character to a good under § 102.11, the only materials that shall be taken into consideration are those domestic or foreign materials that are classified in a tariff provision from which a change in tariff classification is not allowed under the § 102.20 specific rule or other requirements applicable to the good. For purposes of this paragraph (b)(1): ( i ) The materials to be considered must be classified in a tariff provision from which a change in tariff classification is not allowed under the specific rule or other requirements applicable to the good under consideration. For example, in the case of a good classified in HTSUS subheading 8607.11 (the rule for which specifies a change to subheading 8607.11 from any other subheading, except from subheading 8607.12, and except from subheading 8607.19 when that change is pursuant to GRI 2(a)), the only materials that may be considered for purposes of identifying the materials that impart the essential character to the good are those that are classified in subheadings 8607.11, 8607.12 and, if the tariff shift is pursuant to GRI 2(a), 8607.19;
( ii ) Materials that may be considered include materials produced by the producer of the good and incorporated in the good. For example, if a producer of a good purchases raw materials and converts those raw materials into a component that is incorporated in the good, that component is a material that may be considered for purposes of identifying the materials that impart the essential character to the good, provided that the component is classified in a tariff provision from which a change in tariff classification is not allowed under the specific rule or other requirements applicable to the good; and
( iii ) If there is only one material that is classified in a tariff provision from which a change in tariff classification is not allowed under the § 102.20 specific rule or other requirements applicable to the good, then that material will represent the single material that imparts the essential character to the good under § 102.11.
( 2 ) For purposes of determining which one of two or more materials described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section imparts the essential character to a good under § 102.11, various factors may be examined depending upon the type of good involved. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following: ( i ) The nature of each material, such as its bulk, quantity, weight or value; and
( ii ) The role of each material in relation to the use of the good.
[T.D. 96-48, 61 FR 28957, June 6, 1996]
#### § 11.79 Attorney's fees.

No more than 10 per centum of the amount paid in settlement of each individual claim submitted and settled under this subpart shall be paid or delivered to or received by any agent or attorney on account of services rendered in connection with that claim. A person violating this section shall be fined not more than $1,000.

[45 FR 15930, Mar. 12, 1980, as amended at 74 FR 15337, Apr. 3, 2009]
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.223 Subsidy recoupment fee payable to SBA by Borrower. ( a ) The subsidy recoupment fee is payable to SBA when: ( 1 ) Loan has a maturity of 15 years or more.
( 2 ) Borrower makes a voluntary prepayment (or several prepayments in the aggregate) during any one of the first three successive 12 month periods following the first disbursement of the loan. Prepayment is defined as a payment of principal in excess of the amount due according to the amortization schedule.
( 3 ) The prepayment (or several prepayments in the aggregate) is more than 25 percent of the highest outstanding principal balance of the loan in any one of the first three successive 12 month periods following the first disbursement.
( b ) When all the conditions above exist, the following subsidy recoupment fees apply: ( 1 ) If the prepayment is made during the first 12 month period after first disbursement, the charge is 5 percent of the total amount of all prepayments made during such period;
( 2 ) If the prepayment is made during the second 12 month period after first disbursement, the charge is 3 percent of the total amount of all prepayments made during that period; and
( 3 ) If the prepayment is made during the third 12 month period after first disbursement, the charge is 1 percent of the total amount of all prepayments made during that period.
[68 FR 51680, Aug. 28, 2003]
§ 3836.23 How do I petition for deferment of assessment work? In order to apply for deferment— ( a ) You must submit a petition with the BLM State Office that includes: ( 1 ) The names of the claims;
( 2 ) The BLM serial numbers assigned to the claims;
( 3 ) The starting date of the one-year period of the requested deferment; and
( 4 ) A statement that you plan to file a small miner waiver form by September 1st.
( b ) If you are submitting the petition because BLM or another party has denied you a right-of-way, you must also describe— ( 1 ) The ownership and nature of the land, including topography, vegetation, surface water, and existing roads, over which you were seeking a right-of-way to reach your claims;
( 2 ) The land over which you are seeking a right-of-way by legal subdivision if the land is surveyed;
( 3 ) Why present use of the right-of-way is denied or prevented;
( 4 ) The steps you have taken to acquire the right to cross the lands; and
( 5 ) Whether any other right-of-way is available and if so, why it is not feasible to use that right-of-way.
( c ) If you are submitting the petition because of other legal impediments to your access to the claim, you must describe the legal impediments and submit copies of any documents you have that evidence the legal impediments.
( d ) You must record in the local recording office a notice that you are petitioning BLM for a deferment of assessment work.
( e ) You must attach a copy of the notice required by paragraph (d) of this section to the petition you submit to BLM.
( f ) At least one of the claimants of each of the mining claims for which you request a deferment must sign: ( 1 ) The petition you submit to BLM; and
( 2 ) The original notice you record with the local recording office.
( g ) You must pay a processing fee with each petition. (See the table of service charges and fees in § 3830.21 of this chapter.)
[68 FR 61077, Oct. 24, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 58879, Oct. 7, 2005]
ex10-62





 







Exhibit 10.62


 



AMENDMENT TO THE



IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC. 2020 OMNIBUS EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN


 


The
ImageWare Systems, Inc., 2020 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the
“2020 Plan”) is hereby amended,
effective as of the date of adoption of this Amendment by the Board
of Directors of ImageWare Systems, Inc. (the “Company”):


 




1.

Section 4.1 of the
2020 Plan is amended in its entirety:






 


4.1         Authorized
Number of Shares


 


Subject
to adjustment under Section 14, the total number of shares of
Common Stock authorized to be awarded under the Plan shall not
exceed 145.0 million.  In addition, shares of Common Stock
authorized and/or underlying any outstanding award granted under
the Predecessor Plans that, following the Effective Date, expires,
or is terminated, surrendered or forfeited for any reason without
issuance of such shares shall be available for the grant of new
Awards under this Plan.  As provided in Section 1, no new
awards shall be granted under the Predecessor Plans following the
Effective Date.  Shares issued under the Plan may consist in
whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares, treasury
shares, or shares purchased on the open market or otherwise, all as
determined by the Company from time to time.


 


* *
*


 


Except
as amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the Plan shall
otherwise continue in full force and effect.


 


	
 

	

ImageWare
Systems, Inc.


	
 

	
 


	
 

	

By:

	

 /s/ Kristin
Taylor             


	
 

	

Name:

	

 Kristin
Taylor


	
 

	

Title:

	

 President
and Chief Executive Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1721** 
CHONG SU YI, People of Similar Situations , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. GOLDEN CORRAL , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Theodore D. Chuang , District Judge. ( 8:16

- cv - 01151

- TDC )

Submitted : December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE , Circuit Judge s.

Affirmed as modified by un published per curiam opinion
. Chong Su Yi, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Chong Su Yi appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012)
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we modify the district court’s order to show that the dismissal is without prejudice and affirm as modified for the reasons stated by the district court
. Yi v. Golden Co r ral , No. 8:16

- cv - 01151

- TDC (D. Md. May 31, 2016) ; see also Nagy v. FMC
Butner , 37 6 F.3d 252, 258 (4th Cir. 2004) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

61 Forsyth Street SW

Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-13 February 18, 2000

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC COMMISSIONER TO VISIT BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PLANT

ON FEBRUARY 25

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission member, Jeffrey S. Merrifield, will visit Carolina Power &

Light Company’s Brunswick nuclear power plant at Southport, North Carolina, on Friday,

February 25, to tour the facility and discuss its operation with CP&L officials.

Commissioner Merrifield will be available to meet with interested news media representatives at

2:30 p.m. (EST) in the auditorium of the plant’s Technical Training Center.

Commissioner Merrifield was sworn in as a member of the NRC on October 23, 1998. Prior to

assuming that post, he served for several years as senior counsel and legislative assistant to two United

States Senators and as a Washington, D. C. attorney, specializing in environmental and regulatory

issues.

A native of Antrim, N.H., he majored in political science and history at Tufts University where he

received his Bachelor of Arts Degree, magna cum laude, in 1985. He received his Doctor of

Jurisprudence degree from Georgetown University Law Center in 1992. He is a member of the bar of

both New Hampshire and the District of Columbia.

#
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.215 Interlocutory appeals. ( a ) *General.* A motion for leave to take an interlocutory appeal from a Judge's ruling will not be entertained in those proceedings in which OHA issues final decisions. In all other cases, an interlocutory appeal will be permitted only if, upon motion by a party, or upon the Judge's own initiative, the Judge certifies that his or her ruling raises a question which is immediately appealable. Interlocutory appeals will be decided by the AA/OHA or a designee.
( b ) *Motion for certification.* A party must file and serve a motion for certification no later than 20 days after issuance of the ruling to which the motion applies. A denial of the motion does not preclude objections to the ruling in any subsequent request for review of an initial decision.
( c ) *Basis for certification.* The Judge will certify a ruling for interlocutory appeal only if he or she determines that: ( 1 ) The ruling involves an important question of law or policy about which there is substantial ground for a difference of opinion; and
( 2 ) An interlocutory appeal will materially expedite resolution of the case, or denial of an interlocutory appeal would cause undue hardship to a party.
( d ) *Stay of proceedings.* A stay while an interlocutory appeal is pending will be at the discretion of the Judge.
[61 FR 2683, Jan. 29, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 47249, July 18, 2002]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

 CASE NO. 20-61151-CIV-ALTMAN/Hunt 

GERSIA INNOCENT-CAMPBELL and 

ALVE CAMPBELL, 

 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

UNITED AUTO CREDIT 

CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

_______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with 

Prejudice [ECF No. 13]. Being fully advised, the Court hereby 

 ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. Each 

party shall bear its own fees and costs, except as otherwise agreed to. 

 DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida this 4th day of August 2020. 

 _________________________________ 

 ROY K. ALTMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record 

Case 0:20-cv-61151-RKA Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 590 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 590

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To establish limitations regarding Confucius Institutes, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Concerns Over Nations Funding 
University Campus Institutes in the United States Act'' or the 
``CONFUCIUS Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS ON CONFUCIUS INSTITUTES.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Confucius Institute'' 
means a cultural institute directly or indirectly funded by the 
Government of the People's Republic of China.
    (b) Restrictions on Confucius Institutes.--An institution of higher 
education or other postsecondary educational institution (referred to 
in this section as an ``institution'') shall not be eligible to receive 
Federal funds from the Department of Education (except funds under 
title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.) 
or other Department of Education funds that are provided directly to 
students) unless the institution ensures that any contract or agreement 
between the institution and a Confucius Institute includes clear 
provisions that--
            (1) protect academic freedom at the institution;
            (2) prohibit the application of any foreign law on any 
        campus of the institution; and
            (3) grant full managerial authority of the Confucius 
        Institute to the institution, including full control over what 
        is being taught, the activities carried out, the research 
        grants that are made, and who is employed at the Confucius 
        Institute.

            Passed the Senate March 4, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 590

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To establish limitations regarding Confucius Institutes, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-34 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Monday, June 14, 1999)

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MEETING AT CATAWBA

Meeting Is Open To Observation By The Public

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a meeting with the operators of the

Catawba nuclear power plant, located near Rock Hill, South Carolina, at 10:30 a.m. on Friday,

June 18, to discuss results of the agency’s latest Plant Performance Review for the facility.

Results of the review are contained in NRC news release 99-25, issued on April 5.

The meeting will be held in Room 153 A/B of the plant’s administration building and is open

to observation by members of the public. NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to

answer questions from interested observers and meet with state and local officials who attend.

#
#### § 7.4 Further application of this regulation.

This regulation applies to any program for which Federal financial assistance is authorized under a law administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. It applies to money paid, property transferred, or other Federal financial assistance extended after the effective date of the regulation pursuant to an application approved prior to such effective date. This regulation does not apply to (a) any Federal financial assistance by way of insurance or guaranty contracts, (b) money paid, property transferred, or other assistance extended before the effective date of this regulation, (c) any assistance to any individual who is the ultimate beneficiary, or (d) any employment practice, under such program, of any employer, employment agency, or labor organization.

(Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, E.O. 12127 and E.O. 12148)

[30 FR 321, Jan. 9, 1965. Redesignated at 45 FR 44575, July 1, 1980, as amended at 48 FR 44543, Sept. 29, 1983; 68 FR 51379, Aug. 26, 2003]
# Surface-Water, Water-Quality, and Ground-Water Assessment of the Municipio   of Mayagüez, Puerto Rico, 1999-2002

By Jesús Rodríguez-Martínez, Luis Santiago-Rivera,   Senén Guzmán-Ríos, Fernando Gómez-Gómez,   and Mario L. Oliveras-Feliciano

 

In cooperation with the
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComment on high resolution simulations of cosmic strings. 1: Network evoloutionComments are made on recent claims (Albrecht and Turok, 1989) regarding simulations of cosmic string evolution. Specially, it was claimed that results were dominated by a numerical artifact which rounds out kinks on a scale of the order of the correlation length on the network. This claim was based on an approximate analysis of an interpolation equation which is solved herein. The typical rounding scale is actually less than one fifth of the correlation length, and comparable with other numerical cutoffs. Results confirm previous estimates of numerical uncertainties, and show that the approximations poorly represent the real solutions to the interpolation equation.Document ID19900017418Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsTurok, Neil*(Princeton Univ. NJ., United States)*Albrecht, Andreas*(Fermi National Accelerator Lab. Batavia, IL., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1990Subject CategoryAstrophysicsReport/Patent NumberFERMILAB-PUB-90/53-ANAS 1.26:186606NASA-CR-186606Accession Number90N26734Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-1340CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF PHY-80-19754Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017418.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### The People of the State of New York v. Michael Vito.

Motion granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.