alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2024-07-02T14:35:36-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
**Acid Deposition Analysis H**  **2 SO4**  **(g/m 2** **/yr) SO**  **2**

**(g/m 2** **/yr) NO**  **x**

**(g/m 2** **/yr) S** 

**(g/m 2** **/yr) N** 

**(g/m 2** **/yr) Maximum**  0.071 0.049 0.012 0.048 0.0037 **Average within 10 km Radius** 0.0037 0.0069 0.0014 0.0047 0.00043 **Average within Study Area** 0.0015 0.0025 0.00051 0.0017 0.00016 * Assumes each mole of S results in 2 H +eqquivilents and each mole of N, HCl and HF result in 1 H +equivalent

**H 2**  **SO 4**  **SO 2**  **NO x**  **HCl HF**  8.13 355 183 0.239 0.829

Annual Precipitation 21.8 cmyr 218 liter/m2 Baseline Average PH 5.5 Basline Hydronium ions 3.16E-06 H+/liter Zero buffering calculations: Max Incremental H+ eq/liter 2.17E-05 Resultant Hydrogen Ions 2.49E-05 Resultant pH Ave 10 km Incremental H+ eq/liter 8.34E-06 Resultant Hydrogen Ions 1.15E-05 Resultant pH Ave Area H+ eq/liter 7.41E-06 Resultant Hydrogen Ions 1.06E-05 Resultant pH **Emissions Rates (g/sec) HCl** 

**(g/m2/yr) HF (g/m2/yr)**  **H +** **(equivalents/m 2** **/yr)*** 0.0075 0.026 0.0047 0.00058 0.0020 0.0018 0.00027 0.00094 0.0016 equivalent

Resultant pH 4.60 Delta pH -0.90 Resultant pH 4.94 Delta pH -0.56 Resultant pH 4.98 Delta pH -0.52
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

                    By notice dated October 7, 2003, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 29, 2003 (68 FR 61700), ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals, 238 Main South Street, Assonet, Massachusetts 02702, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of Phenylacetone (8501), a basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule II.                

The firm plans to import Phenylacetone to manufacture amphetamine.

                    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in title 21, United States Code, section 823(a) and determined that the registration of ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals to import the listed controlled substances is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals on a regular basis to ensure that the company's continued                           ( print page 5583)                        registration is consistent with the public interest. This investigation included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with State and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to section 1008(a) of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act and in accordance with Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, section 1301.34, the above firm is granted registration as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed.                

Dated: December 24, 2003.

Laura M. Nagel,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 04-2340  Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
### [§180. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title VI, §654(b)(1)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–165]

Section, added Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §903(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4517, related to military retirement pay for retired judges.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1999, see section 1 [[div. A], title VI, §654(c)] of Pub. L. 106–398, set out as an Effective Date of 2000 Amendment note under section 371 of this title.
#### Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Ruth N. Heinze and Others.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
1

EATON & WOLK PL

2665 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE · SUITE 609 · MIAMI · FL 33133 · (305) 249-1640

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

WILLIAM G. WOLK, ESQ.’S AND EATON & WOLK, PL’S MOTION TO 

WITHDRAW AS LOCAL COUNSEL

Movants WILLIAM G. WOLK, ESQ. and EATON & WOLK, PL move this Court to enter 

an order permitting them to withdraw as local counsel for Defendant DEAN VAGNOZZI and 

BOCHETTO & LENTZ, P.C. In support, Movants state as follows:

1. Undersigned counsel appeared in this matter as local counsel for Bochetto & Lentz, 

P.C., which had filed a Motion to Lift Stay of Litigation to permit Dean Vagnozzi to pursue a legal 

malpractice claim in his individual capacity against Eckert Seamans. 

2. On September 8, 2022, the Court lifted that stay. [D.E. 1398].

3. As a result, undersigned counsel’s work in this case has ended.

WHEREFORE, Movants WILLIAM G. WOLK, ESQ. and EATON & WOLK, PL 

respectfully move the Court for an order permitting them to withdraw as local counsel.

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1428 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/18/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

EATON & WOLK PL

2665 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE · SUITE 609 · MIAMI · FL 33133 · (305) 249-1640

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing document was electronically filed on October 

18, 2022 with the CM/ECF filing portal, which will send a notice of electronic filing to all counsel 

of record. 

Respectfully submitted, 

EATON & WOLK, PL

Local Counsel for Bochetto & Lentz, P.C.

2665 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 609

Miami, Florida 33133

Telephone: 305-249-1640

Email: wwolk@eatonwolk.com

mcomas@eatonwolk.com

By: s/William G. Wolk

WILLIAM G. WOLK

FBN: 103527

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1428 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/18/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### Herman Brill v. Louis Abramowitz.

Motion granted. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
First Department,

June, 1914.

#### Boris Kuloschik, Respondent, v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corporation, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 5th day of May, 1914, granting a motion for a preference.

Per Curiam:

There was nothing presented to the court below that justified the preference of this case over other cases on the calendar awaiting trial. The order appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. Present— Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
### §3201. Judgment liens

(a) Creation.—A judgment in a civil action shall create a lien on all real property of a judgment debtor on filing a certified copy of the abstract of the judgment in the manner in which a notice of tax lien would be filed under paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 6323(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. A lien created under this paragraph is for the amount necessary to satisfy the judgment, including costs and interest.

(b) Priority of Lien.—A lien created under subsection (a) shall have priority over any other lien or encumbrance which is perfected later in time.

(c) Duration of Lien; Renewal.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), a lien created under subsection (a) is effective, unless satisfied, for a period of 20 years.

(2) Such lien may be renewed for one additional period of 20 years upon filing a notice of renewal in the same manner as the judgment is filed and shall relate back to the date the judgment is filed if—

(A) the notice of renewal is filed before the expiration of the 20-year period to prevent the expiration of the lien; and

(B) the court approves the renewal of such lien under this paragraph.

(d) Release of Judgment Lien.—A judgment lien shall be released on the filing of a satisfaction of judgment or release of lien in the same manner as the judgment is filed to obtain the lien.

(e) Effect of Lien on Eligibility for Federal Grants, Loans or Programs.—A debtor who has a judgment lien against the debtor's property for a debt to the United States shall not be eligible to receive any grant or loan which is made, insured, guaranteed, or financed directly or indirectly by the United States or to receive funds directly from the Federal Government in any program, except funds to which the debtor is entitled as beneficiary, until the judgment is paid in full or otherwise satisfied. The agency of the United States that is responsible for such grants and loans may promulgate regulations to allow for waiver of this restriction on eligibility for such grants, loans, and funds.

(f) Sale of Property Subject to Judgment Lien.—(1) On proper application to a court, the court may order the United States to sell, in accordance with sections 2001 and 2002, any real property subject to a judgment lien in effect under this section.

(2) This subsection shall not preclude the United States from using an execution sale pursuant to section 3203(g) to sell real property subject to a judgment lien.

(Added Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVI, §3611, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4948.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 6323(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in subsec. (a), is classified to section 6323(f) of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Nov. 29, 1990, and applicable with respect to certain actions for debts owed the United States pending in court on that effective date, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101–647, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-24 April 7, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC, WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER TO DISCUSS OWNERSHIP CHANGE

Nuclear materials licensing issues related to a change in the control and ownership of

Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C., will be discussed by Nuclear Regulatory Commission

staff and representatives of the medical facility on Wednesday, April 12.

The meeting is scheduled to begin 1 p.m. in the Public Meeting Room at the NRC’s Region I

office in King of Prussia, Pa. It will be open to the public.

MedStar Health, the operator of the hospital, announced in February that it had reached a

partnership agreement with Georgetown University Medical Center. Under the transaction, which is

expected to be finalized by July 1, there will be a sharing of services offered by the organizations.

The NRC staff is interested in how the agreement would affect those nuclear medicine

services it regulates.

##
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.610 Form and terms of Certificates. ( a ) *General form and content.* Each Certificate must be registered with the FTA. SBA must approve the terms of the Certificate.
( b ) *Face amount of Pool Certificate.* The face amount of a Pool Certificate cannot be less than a minimum amount as specified in the Program Guide, and the dollar amount of Certificates must be in increments which SBA will specify in the Program Guide (except for one Certificate in each Pool). SBA may change these requirements based upon an analysis of market conditions and program experience, and will publish any such change in the Federal Register.
( c ) *Basis of payment for Pool Certificates.* Principal installments and interest payments are based on the unpaid principal balance of the portion of the Pool represented by a Pool Certificate. All prepayments on loans in the Pool must be passed through to the appropriate Registered Holders with the regularly scheduled payments to such Holders.
( d ) *Basis of payment for Individual Certificates.* Principal installments and interest payments are based on the unpaid principal balance of the SBA guaranteed portion of the loan supporting an Individual Certificate. The Certificate must provide for a pass through to the Registered Holder of payments which the FTA receives from a Lender or any entity servicing the loan, less applicable fees.
( e ) *Interest rate on Pool Certificate.* The interest rate on a Pool Certificate will be either the lowest Net Rate of any individual guaranteed portion of a loan in the Pool or the Dollar-Weighted Average Net Rate of the Pool.
[61 FR 3235, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 67102, Nov. 13, 2008]
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

101 Marietta St., Suite 2900, Atlanta, GA 30323

Tel. 404-331-5503 or 7878

No.: II-96-75 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Tuesday, September 10, 1996)

Roger Hannah 404-331-7878

SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT RATED GOOD

IN ALL FOUR AREAS OF NRC ASSESSMENT REPORT

The Sequoyah nuclear power plant received performance ratings of good in plant operations,

maintenance, engineering and plant support in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's latest

systematic assessment of licensee performance (SALP) of the facility.

The SALP report was sent September 6 to the Tennesee Valley Authority, which operates

the facility near Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee. It evaluates the plant's performance from January 8, 1995,

through July 27 of this year.

NRC and TVA officials will discuss the report during a meeting set for 1:00 p.m.

Wednesday, September 18, at the Sequoyah site. The meeting will be open for public observation.

NRC officials will be available after the meeting to speak with reporters, state and local officials,

and members of the public.

NRC systematic assessment reports rate licensees in four functional areas— plant operations,

maintenance, engineering, and plant support — and assign ratings of Category 1, 2 or 3 depending

on whether their performance in those areas was superior, good or adequate. The report on Sequoyah

gives the plant a Category 2 rating in plant operations, maintenance, engineering and plant support,

indicating “good” performance. In the previous SALP report in February 1995, the plant also

received 2's in all four areas.

In his cover letter to the report, NRC Regional Administrator Stewart Ebneter said “overall

performance of the Sequoyah plant was assessed as good.” He mentioned an excessive number of

reactor trips early in the assessment period with an improving trend toward the end of the period.

Ebneter said improvement was noted in shutdown operations and personnel error reduction,

but “weak areas were found in root cause evaluation and controls for infrequently performed

evolutions.” He said maintenance performance continued to be good although challenges also

remain in that area.

In the letter, Ebneter highlighted good engineering performance in design controls, backlog

reduction and hardware modifications, but said there was weaker performance in corrective actions

and support of operations and maintenance.

In the plant support area, Ebneter said performance was good, particularlyin radiological and

effluent controls and security. However, he said “weaknesses were found in emergency planning

maintenance while resolution of long term fire protection issues continued to be slow.”
###

EDITORS: A copy of the full SALP report is available from this office. SALP reports are also

available on the NRC's internet web site (http://www.nrc.gov/OPA) and by e-mail subscription. To

receive SALP reports by e-mail as they are issued, send an e-mail to listproc@nrc.gov with the

following message: subscribe salp yourfirstname yourlastname.
§ 206.437 State administrative plan. ( a ) *General.* The State must develop a plan for the administration of the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
( b ) *Minimum criteria.* At a minimum, the State administrative plan must include the items listed below: ( 1 ) Designation of the State agency will have responsibility for program administration;
( 2 ) Identification of the State Hazard Mitigation Officer responsible for all matters related to the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
( 3 ) Determination of staffing requirements and sources of staff necessary for administration of the program;
( 4 ) Establishment of procedures to: ( i ) Identify and notify potential applicants (subrecipients) of the availability of the program;
( ii ) Ensure that potential applicants are provided information on the application process, program eligibility and key deadlines;
( iii ) Determine applicant eligibility;
( iv ) Conduct environmental and floodplain management reviews;
( v ) Establish priorities for selection of mitigation projects;
( vi ) Process requests for advances of funds and reimbursement;
( vii ) Monitor and evaluate the progress and completion of the selected projects;
( viii ) Review and approve cost overruns;
( ix ) Process appeals;
( x ) Provide technical assistance as required to subrecipient(s);
( xi ) Comply with the administrative and audit requirements of 2 CFR parts 200 and 3002 and 44 CFR part 206.
( xii ) Provide quarterly progress reports to the Regional Administrator on approved projects.
( xiii ) Determine the percentage or amount of pass-through funds for management costs provided under 44 CFR part 207 that the recipient will make available to subrecipients, and the basis, criteria, or formula for determining the subrecipient percentage or amount.
( c ) *Format.* The administrative plan is intended to be a brief but substantive plan documenting the State's process for the administration of the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program and management of the section 404 funds. This administrative plan should become a part of the State's overall emergency response or operations plan as a separate annex or chapter.
( d ) *Approval.* The State must submit the administrative plan to the Regional Administrator for approval. Following each major disaster declaration, the State must prepare any updates, amendments, or plan revisions required to meet current policy guidance or changes in the administration of the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. Funds will not be awarded until the State Administrative Plan is approved by the FEMA Regional Administrator.
[55 FR 35537, Aug. 30, 1990, as amended at 55 FR 52172, Dec. 20, 1990; 72 FR 57875, Oct. 11, 2007; 74 FR 15352, Apr. 3, 2009; 79 FR 76086, Dec. 19, 2014; 86 FR 50678, Sept. 10, 2021]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration's Audit and Financial Management Advisory Committee (AFMAC) will be hosting its second meeting to discuss such matters that may be presented by members, and staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration, or others present. The meeting will begin on Monday, November 8, 2004, starting at 9 a.m. until noon. The meeting will be held at the U.S. Small Business Administration Headquarters, located at 409 3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, in the Chief Financial Officer's Conference Room, 6th Floor.

                    Anyone wishing to attend must contact Thomas Dumaresq in writing or by fax. Thomas Dumaresq, Chief Financial Officer , 409 3rd Street SW., Washington DC 20416, phone (202) 205-6506, fax: (202) 205-6869, e-mail:                     *thomas.dumaresq@sba.gov.*

Matthew K. Becker,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-23403 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### §5365. Segregation of operations

The Secretary may require by regulations such segregation of operations within the premises, by partitions or otherwise, as may be necessary to prevent jeopardy to the revenue, to prevent confusion between untaxpaid wine operations and such other operations as are authorized in this subchapter, to prevent substitution with respect to the several methods of producing effervescent wines, and to prevent the commingling of standard wines with other than standard wines.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1381; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(a)(47), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 287.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5365, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 665, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1979—Pub. L. 96–39 authorized segregation of operations to prevent the commingling of standard wines with other than standard wines.

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1979 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–39 effective Jan. 1, 1980, see section 810 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.
### §49c–5. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 8, 1947, ch. 210, title I, 61 Stat. 263, which related to a joint budget, was from the Department of Labor Appropriation Act, 1948, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts. Similar provisions were contained in act July 26, 1946, ch. 672, title I, §101, 60 Stat. 686.