alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Lost Link Procedures
If the DJI Inspire 1 loses communication with the ground control station (GCS) the UAS will stop and hover at 100 feet, for a period no longer than two minutes, after which the UAS will fly a pre-determined flight plan at 100 ft programed by the pilot to ensure a safe return to the home location

. During this time the pilot is to verify power, and connections on the GCS in an attempt to re-establish a link with the UAS. For our operations, Onslow County PIC’s will primarily use the return to home unless in an open area where safety of flight would dictate immediate landing

. In the case of a lost link from PIC and UAS, local ATC will be notified the last know height, location, and direction of the UAS. PIC will send, via email, the flight log for that flight from the UAS control system to the local ATC.
### §528. Criminal contempt

No person shall be punished for any criminal contempt allegedly committed outside the immediate presence of the court in connection with any civil action prosecuted by the Secretary or any other person in any court of the United States under the provisions of this chapter unless the facts constituting such criminal contempt are established by the verdict of the jury in a proceeding in the district court of the United States, which jury shall be chosen and empaneled in the manner prescribed by the law governing trial juries in criminal prosecutions in the district courts of the United States.

(Pub. L. 86–257, title VI, §608, Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 541.)
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 24, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1668 Lower Tribunal No. 18-17443 CC

________________ 

### Claudia E. Lewis, etc. , Appellant,
vs. 

### Great Northern Insurance Company, etc. ,

Appellee. An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Myriam Lehr, Judge. The Burton Firm, P.A., and Marc A. Burton and Richard J. Burton, for appellant. Kennedys Law and Kristen D. Perkins and Jordan H. Lewis, for appellee. Before LINDSEY, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24981]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Institute of Museum and Library Services

Sunshine Act Meeting of the National Museum and Library Services 
Board

AGENCY: Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), NFAH.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Museum and Library Services Board, which advises 
the Director of the Institute of Museum and Library Services on general 
policies with respect to the duties, powers, and authority of the 
Institute relating to museum, library and information services, will 
meet on November 13, 2014.

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, November 13, 2014, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. 
EST.

PLACE: The meeting will be held at the Institute of Museum and Library 
Services, 1800 M Street NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036. 
Telephone: (202) 653-4798.

STATUS: Part of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed pursuant to subsections (c)(4) and (c)(9) of 
section 552b of Title 5, United States Code because the Board will 
consider information that may disclose: Trade secrets and commercial or 
financial information obtained from a person and privileged or 
confidential; and information the premature disclosure of which would 
be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed 
agency action.

AGENDA: Thirtieth Meeting of the National Museum and Library Service 
Board Meeting:

I. Welcome
II. Director's Report
III. Financial Update
IV. Legislative Update
V. Office of Museum Services Update and Board Program (Museums United: 
Building Capacity in the Field)
VI. Break
VII. Office of Library Services Update and Board Program (Rising to the 
Challenge: Re-Envisioning Public Libraries, A Report from the Aspen 
Institute)
VIII. Office of Communication and Government Affairs Update
IX. Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation Update (Open to the 
Public)
X. Executive Session (Closed to the Public)

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Maas, Program Specialist, 
Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1800 M Street NW., 9th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20036. Telephone: (202) 653-4676. Please provide advance 
notice of any special needs or accommodations.

    Dated: October 16, 2014.
Nancy E. Weiss,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-24981 Filed 10-16-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7036-01-P
```
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-31 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Tuesday, May 25, 1999)

NRC TEAM FINDS DUKE ‘SCOPING AND SCREENING’ PROCESS

APPROPRIATE FOR OCONEE LICENSE RENEWAL; MEETING SCHEDULED

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspection team has concluded that Duke Energy

Corporation has properly set out the scope of key plant systems, structures and components

and is correctly implementing the methodology for screening them as described in its

application for renewal of the operating licenses for the three-unit Oconee nuclear power

station.

The inspection also determined that the references and documentation supporting the

information in that application are in auditable and retrievable forms.

These findings are described in a report on the first license renewal inspection

performed at the Oconee facility, located near Seneca, SC. The NRC staff will discuss the

results of that inspection at a public meeting Wednesday afternoon, May 26. The plant is the

second in the country to seek operating license renewal

The meeting will be held from 1:00 until approximately 2:00 p.m. in the plant auditorium

located just off Highway 183 about one mile east of the intersection with Highway 130. At the

conclusion of the NRC staff’s presentation, Regional Administrator Luis Reyes will discuss the

license renewal process and schedule for the Oconee plant and be available to answer any

questions from interested media representatives

This inspection, which is the first of three reviews, was completed during the week of

April 26. This "scoping and screening" inspection was conducted to verify that the company's

license renewal program is implemented consistent with the company's license renewal

application and pertinent regulations. Subsequent inspections will verify that programs are in

place to manage the material condition of the systems, structures and components.

The full inspection report is posted on the NRC's web page at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports/renewal.htm

#
### §3301. State administration

Each eligible agency shall be responsible for the State or outlying area administration of activities under this subchapter, including—

(1) the development, implementation, and monitoring of the relevant components of the unified State plan in section 3112 of this title or the combined State plan in section 3113 of this title;

(2) consultation with other appropriate agencies, groups, and individuals that are involved in, or interested in, the development and implementation of activities assisted under this subchapter; and

(3) coordination and nonduplication with other Federal and State education, training, corrections, public housing, and social service programs.

(Pub. L. 113–128, title II, §221, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1614.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
Exhibit 23.3





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of China Digital Communication Group (File No. 333-162701) of our report dated April 9, 2010 with respect to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of New Energy Systems Group (Formerly known as China Digital Communication Group) as of December 31, 2009 and for the year then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of New Energy Systems Group for the year ended December 31, 2009.







/s/ Goldman Kurland and Mohidin LLPGoldman Kurland and Mohidin LLPEncino, CaliforniaAugust 19, 2011
- 000CoverSelfPrint
- 00IntroMapSelfPrint
- 01TentCitySelfPrint
- 02ShowdownSelfPrint
- 03RawhideGraveSelfPrint
- 04TantrapurSelfPrint
- 05CaballeroSelfPrint
- 06TallTSelfPrint
- 07GungaDinBridgeSelfPrint
- 08HowTheWestSelfPrint
- 09HellBentSelfPrint
- 10RawhideStageSelfPrint
- 11BackCoverSelfPrint
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Nathanial Erwin Ferrell, Appellant

No. 06-19-00255-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 71st District Court of 

Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 17-

0329X). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess 

and Justice Stevens, participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Nathanial Erwin Ferrell, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 1, 2020

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 30, 2012

y0123 

# Order

January 30, 2012

143022

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143022 COA: 298628 BOBIE LANELL GEORGE, Wayne CC: 94-012633-FC Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 18, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-84 September 11, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $2,750 FINE AGAINST ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC.

FOR RADIATION SAFETY VIOLATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a

$2,750 fine against Anheuser-Busch, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri,

for improperly dismantling and disposing of two nuclear gauges.

The company uses industrial gauges with a sealed radiation

source containing americium-241 for level measurement and for

detecting whether bottles are present inside packages.

In April, Anheuser-Busch began demolition work on a portion

of a conveyer system which had been inactive for approximately 12

years. Attached to the inactive conveyer were two gauges that

were used to ensure that empty packages no longer contained

bottles. Company personnel, thinking the radioactive sources

were no longer in the gauges, dismantled them and sent them to a

scrap metal facility.

When Anheuser-Busch realized what had happened, it surveyed

some scrap metal facilities and scrap metal on its plant site.

Both gauge housings and one of the two americium-241 sources were

found at the scrap metal facility. The source was intact within

its stainless steel housing. Surveys of two smelting facilities

where the scrap metal would be sent found no abnormal radiation

levels or contamination.

The missing source was not located during the searches.

Based on its assessment of possible scenarios, the company

believes the source was most likely compacted with the scrap

metal or melted with other scrap metal at a smelting facility.

(If the americium-241 source were compacted with other scrap

metal, the source housing and other material surrounding it would

most likely shield the radiation sufficiently to keep any

radiation dose to the public below regulatory limits. If the

source were melted with scrap metal, the americium-241 would most

likely be dispersed in the molten metal and would not represent a

significant safety hazard.)

NRC inspectors in May and June performed confirmatory

surveys at Anheuser-Busch and the local scrap metal facility.
NRC inspectors noted that the gauges were removed from the

conveyor by individuals not authorized to do so, despite

manufacturer’s labels warning that the devices are to be

dismantled only by NRC-licensed individuals. The company also

transferred the gauges to the scrap metal facility, a nonlicensed company, which is another violation of NRC regulations.

The company has until October 2 to pay the fine or to

protest it. If the fine is protested and subsequently imposed by

the NRC staff, the company may request a hearing.

####
### §126–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 126–2 was editorially reclassified as section 6543 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 124
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 124 appear at 72 FR 50040, Aug. 30, 2007, and 76 FR 8253, Feb. 11, 2011.

§ 124.1002 Reviews and protests of SDB status. ( a ) SBA may initiate the review of SDB status on any firm that has represented itself to be an SDB on a prime contract (for goaling purposes or otherwise) or subcontract to a federal prime contract whenever SBA receives credible information calling into question the SDB status of the firm.
( b ) Requests for an SBA review of SDB status may be forwarded to the Small Business Administration, Associate Administrator for Business Development (AA/BD), 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416.
( c ) The contracting officer or the SBA may protest the SDB status of a proposed subcontractor or subcontract awardee. Other interested parties may submit information to the contracting officer or the SBA in an effort to persuade the contracting officer or the SBA to initiate a protest. Such protests, in order to be considered timely, must be submitted to the SBA prior to completion of performance by the intended subcontractor. ( 1 ) SBA will request relevant information from the protested concern pertaining to: ( i ) the social and economic disadvantage of the individual(s) claiming to own and control the protested concern;
( ii ) the ownership and control of the protested concern; and
( iii ) the size of the protested concern.
( 2 ) The concern whose disadvantaged status is under consideration has the burden of establishing that it qualifies as an SDB.
( 3 ) Where SBA requests specific information and the concern does not submit it, SBA may draw adverse inferences against the concern.
( 4 ) SBA will base its SDB determination upon the record, including reasonable inferences from the record, and will state in writing the basis for its findings and conclusions.
( d ) Where SBA determines that a subcontractor does not qualify as an SDB, the prime contractor must not include subcontracts to that subcontractor as subcontracts to an SDB in its subcontracting reports, starting from the time that the protest was decided.
[88 FR 26209, Apr. 27, 2023]
114 STAT. 1288 PUBLIC LAW 106–322—OCT. 19, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3454:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Sept. 6, considered and passed House.

Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–322

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the United States post office located at 451 College Street in Macon,

Georgia, as the ‘‘Henry McNeal Turner Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States post office located at 451 College Street

in Macon, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Henry

McNeal Turner Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Henry

McNeal Turner Post Office’’.

Approved October 19, 2000.

Oct. 19, 2000

[H.R. 3454]
### §625. Administration

The Secretary shall have the power—

#### (a) Delegation of functions; appointment of personnel; technical assistance

to make delegations, to appoint such agents and employees, and to pay for technical assistance on a fee for service basis, as he deems necessary to assist him in the performance of his functions under this chapter;

#### (b) Cooperation with other agencies, employers, labor organizations, and employment agencies

to cooperate with regional, State, local, and other agencies, and to cooperate with and furnish technical assistance to employers, labor organizations, and employment agencies to aid in effectuating the purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 90–202, §6, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 604.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions relating to age discrimination administration and enforcement vested by this section in Secretary of Labor or Civil Service Commission transferred to Equal Employment Opportunity Commission by Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1978, §2, 43 F.R. 19807, 92 Stat. 3781, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, effective Jan. 1, 1979, as provided by section 1–101 of Ex. Ord. No. 12106, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1053.
#### WEDERATH, Appellant, v. GIGG, County Superintendent, Respondent.

(197 N. W. 786.)

(File No. 5231.

Opinion filed March 18,1924.)

1. Appeal and Error — Briefs—Court Rules — Appeal Deemed Abandoned, Where Appellant Failed to Complete Bis Settled Record or File Briefs.

Where five stipulations extending the time for appellant to file and serve his briefs have been filed in the Supreme Court from time to time, and appellant has failed to file his briefs or to complete his settled record, his appeal will be deemed abandoned, and judgment will be affirmed..

2. Appeal and Error — Settled Record — Court Rules — Rule Held Not to Extend Time for Filing Briefs Indefinitely or Beyond Time Actually Necessary to Settle Record.

Supreme Court rule No. 5, providing that, if the settled record has not at the time of notice of appeal been completed, appellant shall, within '30 days, after completion of the settled record, serve and file his briefs does not extend the time indefinitely, or at all beyond the time actually necessary to settle a record by prompt and vigorous action.

*273Appeal from Circuit Court, Lyman County; Hon. N.- D. Burch, Judge.

Action by Frank C. Wederath against W. C. Gigg, as County Superintendent of Schools of Lyman County. Judgment for defendant, and palintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

*Prank C. Wederath,*of Presho, and *M. Q.*Sharpe, of Kennebec, for Appellant.

*Brown & BrovM,*of Chamberlain, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM,

[i, 2] Notice of appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of Lyman county, entered July 7, 1922, was filed in this court’ September 14, 1922. Undertaking on appeal 'was filed here on October 26, 1922. Five stipulations extending the time in which appellant might serve and file his brief have been filed in this court from time to time. The last stiuplation extended the time of January 2, 1923, and was filed1 in this court December itth, 1922. No settled record or notice of the completion of such settled record appears in any of the papers of this case.

Rule five of this court provides as follows:

> “In all civil cases the appellant shall, within thirty days after notice of appeal, unless the settled record has not at the time of notice of appeal, been completed, and, in the latter case, within thirty days after completion of the settled record,” etc.

The last two clauses above quoted were not intended to extend the time for serving and filing briefs indefinitely or at all beyond’ the time actually necessary to settle a record by prompt and vigorous action. We therefore hold that, the appellant having called to complete his settled record or to comply with rules 5, 6, 7,, and 13 of this court, this appeal is deemed abandoned, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 197 N. W. 786. See, Headnote, (1) American Key-Numbered Digest, Appeal and error, Key-No. 773(4), 3 0. J. Sec. 1607, 4 C. J.' Sec. 2437; (2) Appeal and error, Key-No. 765, 3 C. J. Sec. 1603.
No: 23-065 October 11, 2023 

CONTACT: Ivonne Couret, 301-415-8200 

NRC to Hold the 2023 Workshop on Advanced Manufacturing Technologies

for Nuclear Applications; Registration Open Online

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold the 2023 Workshop on Advanced 

Manufacturing Technologies for Nuclear Applications on Oct. 24 - 26 as a hybrid meeting. 

The workshop, hosted by the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, includes 

such topics as implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies in nuclear and nonnuclear applications; qualification and certification; ongoing research; and latest developments in 

applicable codes and standards. 

The workshop will run daily from 8 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time at NRC headquarters in the 

Two White Flint North Auditorium, 11555 Rockville Pike, North Bethesda, Maryland, and 

online via Teams. Attendees who plan to participate in person should register online before 

Oct. 17. The meeting contacts are Eric Focht and Mekonen Bayssie.