alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61865-61866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23509]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ASTM International

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ASTM International 
(``ASTM'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of

[[Page 61866]]

business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: ASTM 
International, West Conshohocken, PA. The nature and scope of ASTM's 
standards development activities are: ASTM International's 
Interlaboratory Crosscheck Programs provide participating laboratories 
with a statistical quality assurance (SQA) tool, enabling them to 
compare their performance in the use of ASTM methods against other 
laboratories worldwide. ASTM Committee D02 on Petroleum Products and 
Lubricants sponsors the programs and more than 600 published standards.
    For additional information, please contact Thomas B. O'Brien, Jr., 
General Counsel, at the above address, telephone <greek-i> (610) 832-
9597, e-mail address <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bbcfd4d9c9d2ded5fbdac8cfd695d4c9dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aadec5c8d8c3cfc4eacbd9dec784c5d8cd">[email protected]</span></a>.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23509 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 63.13 Purpose of subpart.

The purpose of this subpart is to establish criteria under the provisions of section 1306(c) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, by which States can obtain approval from the Federal Insurance Administrator to certify that structures are subject to imminent collapse or subsidence as a result of erosion or undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding anticipated cyclical levels. The subpart also sets forth the procedures and data requirements to be utilized by those States in certifying structures as subject to imminent collapse. The State certification procedure represents an option to the use of the procedure whereby a structure is condemned by a State or local authority as a prerequisite to consideration for imminent collapse insurance benefits.
### §796j. "Older individual who is blind" defined

For purposes of this part, the term "older individual who is blind" means an individual age 55 or older whose significant visual impairment makes competitive employment extremely difficult to attain but for whom independent living goals are feasible.

(Pub. L. 93–112, title VII, §751, as added Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, §410, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1237.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 796j, Pub. L. 93–112, title VII, §751, as added Pub. L. 102–569, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4464, defined "older individual who is blind", prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 105–220.
### §174. Co-equal obligations of employees, their representatives, and management to minimize labor disputes

(a) 1 In order to prevent or minimize interruptions of the free flow of commerce growing out of labor disputes, employers and employees and their representatives, in any industry affecting commerce, shall—

(1) exert every reasonable effort to make and maintain agreements concerning rates of pay, hours, and working conditions, including provision for adequate notice of any proposed change in the terms of such agreements;

(2) whenever a dispute arises over the terms or application of a collective-bargaining agreement and a conference is requested by a party or prospective party thereto, arrange promptly for such a conference to be held and endeavor in such conference to settle such dispute expeditiously; and

(3) in case such dispute is not settled by conference, participate fully and promptly in such meetings as may be undertaken by the Service under this chapter for the purpose of aiding in a settlement of the dispute.

(June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title II, §204, 61 Stat. 154.)

1 So in original. No subsec. (b) has been enacted.
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

101 Marietta St., Suite 2900, Atlanta, GA 30323

Tel. 404-331-5503 or 7878

No.: II-97-16 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Friday, February 7, 1997)

Roger Hannah 404-331-7878

NRC SCHEDULES MEETING WITH FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION

TO DISCUSS CRYSTAL RIVER PLANT RESTART

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting with

Florida Power Corporation officials at the Crystal River plant site on

Wednesday, February 12 at 12 noon to discuss items related to the restart of

the plant.

In September 1996, FPC voluntarily shut the Crystal River plant down when

the company identified several potential unreviewed safety questions. In

addition, the NRC staff had observed significant performance concerns at the

plant during the past two years.

The NRC staff subsequently established a restart panel to review a number

of issues before the plant returns to operation. That panel is composed of NRC

technical staff members from the NRC Region II office in Atlanta and from the

agency's headquarters in Rockville, Maryland, and is chaired by Region II

Division of Reactor Safety Director Johns Jaudon.

The NRC staff has asked FPC to come to the February 12 meeting prepared

to discuss the history of any modifications to safety systems, the company’s

progress on determining how current plant conditions compare to the plant's

design basis, and the measurements used to assess the effectiveness of FPC's

corrective action program with the results observed so far.

The meeting will be held in the Site Administration Building and is open

to observation by members of the public.

#
#### § 500.214 OMB control number. [Reserved]
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Don Crosbie, certify that:
1)  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Claimsnet.com inc.; 2)  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3)  Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other consolidatedfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects theconsolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4)  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for Claimsnet.com inc. and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure control and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.
5)  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s independentregistered public accounting firm and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 16, 2005
/s/ Don Crosbie
Don Crosbie
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

101 Marietta St., Suite 2900, Atlanta, GA 30323

No. II-96-39 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Monday, April 8, 1996)

Roger Hannah 404-331-7878

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have

announced the assignment of Mr. Joseph Brady as the agency's

Senior Resident Inspector at the Harris nuclear power plant,

located near Raleigh, North Carolina.

He succeeds Mr. Stephen Elrod, who has retired from the NRC.

Since 1986, Mr. Brady has held NRC assignments as a Project

Engineer and Inspector in the NRC's Region II office in Atlanta,

and most recently, as a Reactor Engineer in the Region II

Division of Reactor Safety. Before joining the NRC, he was an

engineer for the Brunswick Corporation and Chevron USA, and an

officer in the U.S. Navy. He received a Bachelor's degree in

Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University.

Mr. Brady assumed his official duties at the Harris plant on

March 18, 1996, joining NRC Resident Inspector Darrell Roberts.

####
#### Snowden E. Lea, Respondent, v. Sarah A. Lea, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ. [180 Misc. 719.]
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.251 Applicability.

Title XXXI of Public Law 107-210 (116 Stat. 933), entitled the Andean Trade Promotion and Drug Eradication Act (ATPDEA), amended sections 202, 203, 204, and 208 of the Andean Trade Preference Act (the ATPA, 19 U.S.C. 3201-3206) to authorize the President to extend additional trade benefits to ATPA beneficiary countries that have been designated as ATPDEA beneficiary countries. Sections 204(b)(1) and (b)(4) of the ATPA (19 U.S.C. 3203(b)(1) and (b)(4)) provide for the preferential treatment of certain non-textile articles that were not entitled to duty-free treatment under the ATPA prior to enactment of the ATPDEA. The provisions of §§ 10.251-10.257 of this part set forth the legal requirements and procedures that apply for purposes of obtaining preferential treatment pursuant to ATPA sections 204(b)(1) and (b)(4).
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61016-61017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23193]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

* * * * *

Date and Time: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC

Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items to be Discussed: 

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.
* * * * *

Date and Time: Thursday, October 21, 2004 at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (Ninth floor).

[[Page 61017]]


Status: This meeting will be opened to the public.

Items to be Discussed: 

Correction and Approval of Minutes.
Advisory Opinion 2004-34: The Libertarian Party of Virginia by Kevin 
McKenna, Treasurer.
Advisory Opinion 2004-37: Representative Maxine Waters by counsel, 
Joseph M. Birkenstock.
Explanation and Justification for Political Committee Rulemaking.
Candidate Debates--Notice of Disposition of Petition for Rulemaking.
Routine Administrative Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Biersack, Acting Press 
Officer, Telephone (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-23193 Filed 10-12-04; 3:16 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Secretary of Natural Resources 

www.deq. virginia.gov 

SEP 1 7 2015 

Diana Esher, Director 

Air Protection Division (3APOO) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

Director 

(804) 698-4020 

1-800-592-5482 

Reference: Definition of Volatile 

Organic Compound 

(Revision E 14) 

Dear Ms. Esher: 

Pursuant to the requirements of§ 110 of the Clean Air Act, we are officially requesting 

approval of a revision to the Commonwealth of Virginia State Implementation Plan approved 

and submitted under the authority of§ 10.1-1185 of the Code ofVirginia and in accordance with 

the requirements of 40 CFR Part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of 

Implementation Plans). 

This revision amends the definition of volatile organic compound (VOC) to add 2-amino2-methyl-1-propanol (also known as AMP) to the list of substances that are not considered to be 

VOCs in order to be consistent with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) definition 

as amended on March 27,2014 (79 FR 17037). The regulation amendments were adopted by the 

State Air Pollution Control Board on September 5, 2014 under the authority of§ 10.1-1308 of 

the Code ofVirginia. 

Enclosed are the following: 

1. A true copy of the official regulation (Revision E 14) which was published in the 

Virginia Register of Regulations on June 15, 2015 after being duly adopted by the State Air 
procedures. 

3. Public participation record. 

If you have any questions or need additional information, please let us know. 

DKP\kgs 

TEMPLATES\SIP-REG\REGOO 

SIP\NONATTN PLANS\2015\El4-SIP.DOC 

Enclosures 

David K. Paylor
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1885

JOSEPH JOHNSON; JOHN C. POTEAT; LYNETTE EVERETT; MARSHALL E. 

GWYNN; ERIKA BANNISTER; LAMONT D. JACKSON, Individually and on 

Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:18-cv-03768-CCB)

Submitted: August 31, 2020 Decided: September 17, 2020

Before KING, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew J. Toland III, TOLAND LAW, LLC, Sparks, Maryland; James M. Ray, II, RAY 

LEGAL GROUP, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellants. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney 

General, Eric S. Hartwig, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY 

GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Johnson, John C. Poteat, Lynette Everett, Lamont D. Jackson, Marshall E. 

Gwynn, and Erika Bannister appeal the district court’s order granting the Maryland Transit 

Administration’s motion to dismiss their claims brought under the Fair Labor Standards 

Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, on sovereign immunity grounds. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Johnson v. Md. Transit Admin., No. 1:18-cv-03768-CCB (D. Md. filed July 19, 

2019 & entered July 22, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40750

Summary Calendar

SHEET METAL WORKERS’ INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO.

337; J.C. HART, III

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

TYLER, CITY OF TEXAS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the

Eastern District of Texas

(6:96-CV-350)

April 17, 1997

Before JOHNSON, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Sheet Metal Workers’ International Association (union) and

J.C. Hart, III appeal a judgment entered in favor of the City of

Tyler, Texas, after a bench trial. The district court’s findings

of fact were not clearly erroneous. See Seal v. Knorpp, 957 F.2d

1230, 1234 (5th Cir. 1992). Furthermore, the district court did

not err in concluding that the City’s no smoking ordinance is not

preempted by the National Labor Relations Act. See Metropolitan
2

Life Ins. Co. v. Massachusetts, 471 U.S. 724, 753-55 (1985). The

district court also did not err in concluding that the ordinance

does not violate the Contracts Clause or the Due Process Clause of

the United States Constitution. See Keystone Bitmus Coal Ass’n v.

DeBenedictis, 480 U.S. 470, 502-03 (1987); Energy Reserves Group,

Inc. v. Kansas Power and Light Co., 459 U.S. 400, 411-12 (1983);

Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus, 438 U.S. 234, 241-42

(1978); FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of Austin, 93 F.3d 167,

175 (5th Cir. 1996).

 

 AFFIRMED.
Continental Shelf Slope Rise 

Privately Owned

State Owned

Privately Owned

State Owned

AL, AK, CA, CT, FL,GA, MD, MS, NJ, NY,NC, OR, RI, SC, WA

{

Private

State

DE, MA, ME,NH, VA

{ TX

{

MHHW MHW

MLLW

Chart Datum

3 nmi

Exception3 leaguesfor TX &FL W. coast

+3 nmi

“8(g)

zone”

Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ

State Submerged Lands Federal Submerged Lands

Territorial Sea Contiguous Zone

12 nmi

24 nmi

200 nmi

Foot of

Slope 1 naut

6076.103 

or 

(Except 

HI

LA

Washup Line

Highest

Winter Tide

Privately Owned

State Owned
EXHIBIT 32.1

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skynet Telematics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB, for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Tomas George Wilmot, President of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Tomas George Wilmot
------------------------
    Tomas George Wilmot
    President

April 30, 2007


<PAGE>
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 17 L Corrective Action
FEDERAL REOUIREMENT FEDERAL ReM**ClTATl~** ANAlOGOUS STATE CIT A T10N IN SCOPE PART 264 • STANDARDS FOR THE OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILlTlES SUBPART F • RELEASES FROM SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS APPLICABILITY solid waste mana emant unit 

### WAC 173-303-645(1)(a)(i CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS solid waste 

### WAC 173-303-646 'X manaaement unit 264.101la\ X soeclfled In oermlt 264.101lb\ 

### WAC 173-303-646(2)(() X 

## **
PART 270 - PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS 

# i.e-_ SUBPART F - SPECIAL FORMS OF PERMITS PERMITS BY RULE UIC permits Issued 270.60lbH3\ 

### WAC 173-303-802(3) after 11/8184 

### X NPDES permits Issued**270.60~(3)** 

### WAC 173**~303-802(4)(c)(viii)** after 11/8184 

### Mil**~(d)** 

### X



## ** ?tate requirements for corrective action at non-SWMUs are considered broade ln scope. See Attorney Generalis statement for detailed**disc~ssion. ~-** 



# e· July 

### 15. 1985 • Page 

### 19 of 

### 27
§ 305.9 Project phasing and Investment disbursement. ( a ) EDA may authorize in advance the award of construction contracts in phases, provided the Recipient submits a request that includes each of the following: ( 1 ) Valid reasons justifying why the Project must be phased;
( 2 ) Description of the specific elements to be completed in each phase;
( 3 ) Detailed construction cost estimates for each phase;
( 4 ) Time schedules for completing all phases of the Project;
( 5 ) Certification that the Recipient can and will fund any overrun(s); and
( 6 ) Certification that the Recipient is capable of paying incurred costs prior to the first disbursement of EDA funds.
( b ) EDA will begin disbursement of funds after receipt of evidence sufficient to EDA of compliance with all Investment award conditions. EDA may approve the disbursement of funds prior to the tender of all construction contracts if the Recipient can demonstrate to EDA's satisfaction that a severe financial hardship will result without such approval.
### §7011. Registration—persons paying a special tax

#### (a) Requirement

Every person engaged in any trade or business on which a special tax is imposed by law shall register with the Secretary his name or style, place of residence, trade or business, and the place where such trade or business is to be carried on. In case of a firm or company, the names of the several persons constituting the same, and the places of residence, shall be so registered.

#### (b) Registration in case of death or change of location

Any person exempted under the provisions of section 4905 from the payment of a special tax, shall register with the Secretary in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 845; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.
### Part B—Basic Vocational Rehabilitation Services