alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[106th Congress Public Law 322]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ322.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1288]]

Public Law 106-322
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the United States post office located at 451 College Street 
          in Macon, Georgia, as the ``Henry McNeal Turner Post 
            Office''. <<NOTE: Oct. 19, 2000 -  [H.R. 3454]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States post office located at 451 College Street in 
Macon, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the ``Henry McNeal 
Turner Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Henry McNeal Turner Post 
Office''.

    Approved October 19, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3454:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Sept. 6, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
### Part B—Compensation
Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for 

the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category 

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0598

DCN: SGE01184.A03 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-61455-CIV-SMITH

GUERLINE EDOUARD,

Plaintiff,

v.

TRI-STATE ADJUSTMENTS INC.,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

This matter is before the Court on the Notice of Pending Settlement [DE 5] filed on August 

24, 2020, which indicates the parties have settled this case. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that:

1) the parties shall file appropriate dismissal papers with the Court no later than

September 30, 2020. 

2) All pending motions not otherwise ruled on are DENIED AS MOOT.

3) This case is CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 31st day of August 2020.

Case 0:20-cv-61455-RS Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2020 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.222 Oral hearing. ( a ) *Availability.* A party may obtain an oral hearing only if: ( 1 ) It is required by regulation; or
( 2 ) Following the motion of a party, or at his or her own initiative, the Judge orders an oral hearing upon concluding that there is a genuine dispute as to a material fact that cannot be resolved except by the taking of testimony and the confrontation of witnesses.
( b ) *Place and time.* The place and time of oral hearings is within the discretion of the Judge, who shall give due regard to the necessity and convenience of the parties, their attorneys, and witnesses. The Judge may direct that an oral hearing be conducted by telephone.
( c ) *Public access.* Unless otherwise ordered by the Judge, all oral hearings are public.
( d ) *Payment of subpoenaed witnesses.* A party who obtains a witness's presence at an oral hearing by subpoena must pay to that witness the fees and mileage costs to which the witness would be entitled in Federal court.
( e ) *Recording.* Oral hearings will be recorded verbatim. A transcript of a recording may be purchased by a party, at its own expense, from the recording service.
[61 FR 2683, Jan. 29, 1996, as amended at 63 FR 35766, June 30, 1998; 70 FR 17587, Apr. 7, 2005; 75 FR 47442, Aug. 6, 2010]
§ 130.480 Program income. ( a ) Program income and interest earned on program income, may only be used for authorized purposes, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.307 and the cooperative agreement, such as to expand the quantity or quality of services, resources or outreach provided by the SBDC network.
( b ) Program income may not be reported or used as a matching resource. Unused program income must be carried over to the subsequent budget period by the SBDC network; however, the aggregate amount of network program income cannot exceed 25 percent of the total SBDC budget (Federal and matching expenditures).
( c ) Program income exceeding 25 percent of the total approved SBDC budget must be expended by the SBDC network prior to the end of the budget/project period in which the excess occurs.
( d ) The Lead Center must report the consolidated program income sources and uses as an attachment to the financial status report for the SBDC network during the budget period. The SBDC must provide a narrative describing how program income was used to further program objectives.
[88 FR 76647, Nov. 7, 2023]
### [§2202. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1902(a)(8), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1805]

Section, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 401; June 25, 1959, Pub. L. 86–70, §22(a), 73 Stat. 146; July 12, 1960, Pub. L. 86–624, §18(b), 74 Stat. 416, related to the presumption that missionaries duly commissioned and serving under boards of foreign missions are residents of the State or the District of Columbia wherein they resided at the time of their commission and departure for service.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to estates of decedents dying after Oct. 4, 1976, see section 1902(c)(1) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as an Effective Date of 1976 Amendment note under section 2012 of this title.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-197 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
PUBLIC LAW 108–473—DEC. 21, 2004 118 STAT. 3897

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4968:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Oct. 6, considered and passed House.

Dec. 7, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–473

108th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 25 McHenry

Street in Rosine, Kentucky, as the ‘‘Bill Monroe Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

25 McHenry Street in Rosine, Kentucky, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Bill Monroe Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Bill Monroe

Post Office’’.

Approved December 21, 2004.

Dec. 21, 2004

[H.R. 4968]
MICHAEL F. BENNET 

COLORADO 

COMMITTEES: 

AGRICULTURE, NUTRITION, AND FORESTRY 

BANKING, HOUSING, AND 

URBAN AFFAIRS 

HEALTH, EDUCATION, L^BOR, 

AND PENSIONS 

SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING 

lanited States Senate 

WASHINGTON, DC 20510-0609 

WASHINGTON. DC: 

458 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE ButLDiNG 

WASHINGTON, DC 20510 

(202)224^5852 

COLORADO: 

2300 1 5TM STREET 

SUITE 450 

DENVER, CO 80202 

(303)455-7600 

http://www.bennet.senate.gov 

August 1,2011 

Aloha Ley 

Associate Director 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Small Community Program, W86-310 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

CD 

C O 

RE: Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport's Application (DUNS #0764814070000) for a SmaU 

Community Air Service Development Pilot Program Grant (CFDA DOT-OST-2011-0119) 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

I am pleased to support an application recently submitted by the Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport 

for the Small Community Air Service Development Pilot Program Grant. If approved, funding will 

support the development of an air service strategic plan which will be used to increase awareness of 

airport initiatives, support incumbent carriers, provide new jobs, and improve the region's access to the 

air transportation network. 

The Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport is one of 14 certified commercial service airports in the 

state of Colorado and it serves approximately 35,000 passengers each year. Recent additions of 

destinations such as the Mesa Airport have elevated the need for a comprehensive plan to introduce other 

potential service routes. Grant funds will support the critical planning and development of the general 

aviation, corporate, and air carrier community. 

The Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport has served residents and businesses well in Northern 

Colorado. The Fort Collins Chamber of Commerce, The Loveland Chamber of Commerce and the 

Northern Colorado Economic Development Corporation are among several community groups voicing 

their support for this grant application. As the demand grows for regional transportation by flight, the 

strategic development of long-range goals and objectives will ensure that the airport continues to be a 

successfiil economic generator. 

I encourage you to give the grant application submitted by the Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport 

every appropriate consideration consistent with all applicable laws and regulations. Thank you for your 

attention, and please notify my office of funds awarded. 

Sincerely, 

Michael F. Bennet 

United States Senator 

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
#### TROY LAUNDRY MACHINERY CO., LTD., Respondent, v. SCHULSTAD et al., Appellants.

(201 N. W. 158.)

(File No. 5588.

Opinion filed December 2, 1924.)

Appeal from 'Circuit Court, Brown County.

*Max Stokes,*of Aberdeen, for Respondent.

*Leo M. Fitzpatrick,*of Aberdeen, for Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order.' The notice of appeal in this action was' served and filed in Brown county about November 9, 1923. Nlo record has been settled, and no other paper's, excepting an affidavit of service, have been filed.

Appellant having failed to- comply with rules. 5, 6, 7, and 13 of this court, relating to appeals, this appeal is deemed abandoned and the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
---

---

Exhibit 15.8

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-156686) of
our report dated February 25, 2009, with respect to the financial statements of Magic
(Onyx) Magyarorszag Szoftverhaz Kft., included in this annual report on Form 20-F of
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2008.

24-04-2009

| |  | /s/ Maria Negyessy
Maria NegyessyReg. Auditor 003784
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
### [§792. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §121(b), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 34]

Section, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 923; July 28, 1953, ch. 253, §4(a), 67 Stat. 226; Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1263, §41, 68 Stat. 1240; Aug. 14, 1964, Pub. L. 88–426, title IV, §403(h), 78 Stat. 434; Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–681, §3, 80 Stat. 959; Dec. 16, 1967, Pub. L. 90–206, title II, §213(e), 81 Stat. 635; Aug. 9, 1975, Pub. L. 94–82, title II, §205(b)(7), 89 Stat. 423; July 20, 1977, Pub. L. 95–69, §3, 91 Stat. 274, provided for appointment by Court of Claims and compensation of sixteen commissioners.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as an Effective Date of 1982 Amendment note under section 171 of this title.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-215 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, December 2, 1998)

NRC WITHDRAWS PROPOSED CHANGE ON REPORTING

REQUIREMENTS FOR RISK-SIGNIFICANT REACTOR SYSTEMS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is withdrawing a notice of proposed rulemaking

that solicited comments on proposed amendments to its regulations that would have required

the operators of commercial nuclear power plants to provide NRC with reliability and availability

information for selected risk-significant equipment.

The proposed rule, published for public comment in the Federal Register on February

12, 1996, would also have required licensees for commercial nuclear power plants to maintain

this data on site and make it available to the NRC for inspection.

The Commission has decided instead to accept industry’s proposed alternative to

voluntarily provide reliability and availability information about risk-significant systems and

equipment. This approach enabled NRC to obtain the information needed to make estimates

of the reliability of key plant components sooner than would have been possible if it pursued an

amendment to its regulations, which could have taken years.

##
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: July 28, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: John Bradfield, EPA

SUBJECT: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 Meeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the American Forest & Paper Association on May 5, 2015 

to discuss biogenic fuels and the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The 

Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

Meeting Materials attached

ATTENDEES for all or a portion of the meeting

US EPA

Kelly Rimer

Marc Houyoux

Madeleine Strum

Ted Palma

Robin Dunkins

Jim Hertz

Barrett Parker

Anna Wood

Richard Wayland

Ray Merrill

Kim Garnett

George Bridgers

Stef Johnson

Bob Schell

Jason DeWees

Nick Swanson

Juan Santiago

Peter Tsirigotis

Kelley Spence

John Bradfield

AF&PA Members

Roberto Artiga Kaptone Kraft Paper Co

Jim Balik Resolute

Corey Brandt RockTenn

Robert Crawford NCASI

Mike Curtis Georgia-Pacific

Phil Ferguson LP
Rich Garber Packaging Corporation of America

Sarah Hedrick Verso

Dave Heinold AECOM

Gary Heroux Composite Panel Association

Tim Hunt AF&PA-AWC

Ashok Jain NCASI

Rob Kaufmann Koch

Amy Marshall AECOM

Paul Noe AF&PA-AWC

Brittany Robinson International Paper

Furqan Shaikh Graphic Packaging

Jeff Shumaker International Paper

Bryan Smalley Southeastern Lumber Manufacturers Assn.

Russell Strader Boise Cascade Co.

Jim Taylor MWV

Linda Tsang AF&PA-AWC

Vipin Varma NCASI

Kathy Wiedeman Glatfelter

Steve Woock Weyerhaeuser

Ryan Gesser Georgia-Pacific

Lisa Bauer Lotto Green Bay Packaging

Annabeth Reitter Domtar
AF&PA-AWC-EPA Air Issue Discussions Agenda

(May 5, 2015)

EPA offices - 109 T W Alexander Drive C261, Durham, NC 27705

Some drivers license are deemed unacceptable ID for Federal buildings, so bring a 

passport instead if on list: http://www.dhs.gov/real-id-enforcement-brief.

Room: C114 (downstairs down corridor from cafeteria)

Conference line: 1-866-299-7945; 4632588#

9:15 AM Subpart MM RTR (AF&PA only; Spence, Bradfield, Dunkins, Hirtz)

• Rulemaking update

• Review AF&PA preliminary risk analysis

• QA/QC of model input data by NCASI/companies

• NATA update

• Next Steps

10:30 AM NAAQS Permitting (Wayland, Wood, Santiago, et al)

• Update on Appendix W

• Fugitive improvements – wood handling and detection issues

• Test method improvements – blank correction guidance, bias 

measurement, wet sources

• Ambient air

• Other rulemaking updates (if time): MERPS, SIL/SERs/transport

• Next steps – set future calls

Noon to 1:15 PM Lunch in EPA Cafeteria

1:15 to 2:30 PM Boiler MACT (Eddinger, Fruh)

• Reconsideration update

• Discuss key issues

• Next Steps

2:45 to 3:45 PM Biogenics rulemakings (Santiago, Tsirigotis)

• Clean Power Plan and Biomass Accounting Framework

• PSD Biogenic proposal

• Interim PSD permitting plan
3:45 to 4:45 PM PCWP MACT/RTR (AWC only, Bradfield, Spence, Dunkins)

• EPA ICR update

• Review NCASI survey and results – utility to EPA data gathering

• Next steps – data sharing and work practices
#### § 361.1 Purpose.

This part prescribes the policies to be followed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and States in the administration of FEMA's earthquake hazards reduction assistance program, and establishes the criteria for cost-sharing.
### §1308. Annual report by the corporation

(a) As soon as practicable after the close of each fiscal year the corporation shall transmit to the President and the Congress a report relative to the conduct of its business under this subchapter for that fiscal year. The report shall include financial statements setting forth the finances of the corporation at the end of such fiscal year and the result of its operations (including the source and application of its funds) for the fiscal year and shall include an actuarial evaluation of the expected operations and status of the funds established under section 1305 of this title for the next five years (including a detailed statement of the actuarial assumptions and methods used in making such evaluation).

(b) The report under subsection (a) shall include—

(1) a summary of the Pension Insurance Modeling System microsimulation model, including the specific simulation parameters, specific initial values, temporal parameters, and policy parameters used to calculate the financial statements for the corporation;

(2) a comparison of—

(A) the average return on investments earned with respect to assets invested by the corporation for the year to which the report relates; and

(B) an amount equal to 60 percent of the average return on investment for such year in the Standard & Poor's 500 Index, plus 40 percent of the average return on investment for such year in the Lehman Aggregate Bond Index (or in a similar fixed income index); and

(3) a statement regarding the deficit or surplus for such year that the corporation would have had if the corporation had earned the return described in paragraph (2)(B) with respect to assets invested by the corporation.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title IV, §4008, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 1014; Pub. L. 109–280, title IV, §412, Aug. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 936.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–280 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).
(iv) during any period of 12 months, individuals who at the beginning of such periodconstituted the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board), together with any new directorswhose election by the Board or whose nomination for election by the stockholders of theCompany was approved by a vote of a majority of the directors of the Company (then still inoffice) who were either directors at the beginning of such period or whose election ornomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute amajority of the Board, then in office;provided, however, that such transaction also constitutes a change in control event withinthe meaning of Section 409A.The term Permitted Holders as used above shall mean any of (i) Blackstone or its affiliates,(ii) an employee benefit plan (or trust forming a part thereof) maintained by (A) theCompany or (B) any corporation or other person or entity of which a majority of its votingpower of its voting equity securities or equity interest is owned, directly or indirectly,by the Company, and (iii) VHS Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or any ofits subsidiaries. The term Blackstone as used above shall mean each of of Blackstone FCHCapital Partners IV L.P., Blackstone Health Commitment Partners L.P., Blackstone CapitalPartners IV-A L.P., Blackstone Family Investment Partnership IV-A L.P., Blackstone HealthCommitment Partners-A L.P., Blackstone FCH Capital Partners IV-B L.P., and Blackstone FCHCapital Partners IV-A L.P., and their respective Affiliates.”3. Amendment to Section 11(e)(i). Section 11(e)(i) of the EA shall be amended byadding the following phrase to the end of the paragraph as follows:“; for greater certainty, the pro-rata portion of the Executive’s current year annual bonuswill be determined following the end of the applicable measurement period and will be paidat the same as annual bonuses are otherwise paid to the Company’s senior executives.”4. Amendment to Section 11(g). Section 11(g) of the EA shall be amended by adding thefollowing sentence to the end of Section 11(g):“Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of Section 409A, the right to a series ofinstallment payments under this Agreement shall be treated as a right to a series ofseparate payments and, in addition, any payment that is otherwise exempt from theapplication of Section 409A shall not be included in the calculation of DeferredCompensation Separation Benefits.”5. Ratification. All other provisions of the EA remain unchanged and are herebyratified by the Company and the Executive.
 
2

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its dulyauthorized officer and the Executive has executed this Amendment, each as of the day and year firstset forth above.         **Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.**           By: /s/ Ronald P. Soltman             Name: Ronald P. Soltman
§ 45.59 What are the requirements for post-hearing briefs? ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Each party may file a post-hearing brief within 15 days after the close of the hearing.
( 2 ) A party may file a reply brief only if requested by the ALJ. The deadline for filing a reply brief, if any, will be set by the ALJ.
( 3 ) The ALJ may limit the length of the briefs to be filed under this section.
( b ) *Content.* ( 1 ) An initial brief must include: ( i ) A concise statement of the case;
( ii ) A separate section containing proposed findings regarding the issues of material fact, with supporting citations to the hearing record;
( iii ) Arguments in support of the party's position; and
( iv ) Any other matter required by the ALJ.
( 2 ) A reply brief, if requested by the ALJ, must be limited to any issues identified by the ALJ.
( c ) *Form.* ( 1 ) An exhibit admitted in evidence or marked for identification in the record may not be reproduced in the brief. ( i ) Such an exhibit may be reproduced, within reasonable limits, in an appendix to the brief.
( ii ) Any pertinent analysis of an exhibit may be included in a brief.
( 2 ) If a brief exceeds 20 pages, it must contain: ( i ) A table of contents and of points made, with page references; and
( ii ) An alphabetical list of citations to legal authority, with page references.
### §118a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 118a was editorially reclassified as section 5504 of this title.
### §3306. Remedies of the United States

(a) In General.—In an action or proceeding under this subchapter for relief against a transfer or obligation, the United States, subject to section 3307 and to applicable principles of equity and in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, may obtain—

(1) avoidance of the transfer or obligation to the extent necessary to satisfy the debt to the United States;

(2) a remedy under this chapter against the asset transferred or other property of the transferee; or

(3) any other relief the circumstances may require.

(b) Limitation.—A claim for relief with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under this subchapter is extinguished unless action is brought—

(1) under section 3304(b)(1)(A) within 6 years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred or, if later, within 2 years after the transfer or obligation was or could reasonably have been discovered by the claimant;

(2) under subsection (a)(1) or (b)(1)(B) of section 3304 within 6 years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred; or

(3) under section 3304(a)(2) within 2 years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred.

(Added Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVI, §3611, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4963.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (a), are set out in the Appendix to this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Nov. 29, 1990, and applicable with respect to certain actions for debts owed the United States pending in court on that effective date, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101–647, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.