alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 115

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 115 appear at 72 FR 50038, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 115.11 Applying to participate in the Surety Bond Guarantee Program.

Sureties interested in participating as Prior Approval Sureties or PSB Sureties should apply in writing to the D/SG at 409 3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416. OSG will determine the eligibility of the applicant considering its standards and procedures for underwriting, administration, claims and recovery. Each applicant must be a corporation listed by the U.S. Treasury as eligible to issue bonds in connection with Federal procurement contracts. At a minimum, each applicant must have salaried staff that is employed directly (not an agent or other individual or entity under contract with the applicant) to oversee its underwriting function and perform all claims and recovery functions other than specialized services the costs of which may be reimbursable under 13 CFR 115.16(e)(1). Final settlement authority for claims and recovery must be vested only in the applicant's salaried claims staff. The applicant must continue to comply with SBA's standards and procedures for underwriting, administration, claims, recovery, and staffing requirements while participating in SBA's Surety Bond Guarantee Programs.

[61 FR 3271, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 81 FR 23565, Apr. 22, 2016]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

No. 99-85

October 1, 1999

NRC APPROVES TRANSFER OF DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.’S PARTIAL OWNERSHIP

IN BEAVER VALLEY AND PERRY NUCLEAR PLANTS TO FIRSTENERGY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved the

transfer of Duquesne Light Co.’s partial ownership and operating

authority for the Beaver Valley nuclear power plant to

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co. The NRC has also approved the

transfer of Duquesne Light’s partial ownership of the Perry

nuclear power plant to FirstEnergy Nuclear.

Beaver Valley is located in Shippingport, Pa., while Perry

is in Perry, Ohio.

In May, Duquesne Light and FirstEnergy, based in Akron,

Ohio, jointly submitted an application to the NRC requesting

approval for the transfers. An asset transfer agreement between

the two companies calls for FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating

Company, a subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp., to assume operating

authority for Beaver Valley. Under the proposal, Pennsylvania

Power Co. will take control of Duquesne Light’s 47.5-percent

ownership in Beaver Valley Unit 1 and its 13.74-percent ownership

in Beaver Valley Unit 2. Also under the proposal, Cleveland

Electric Illuminating Co. will take control of Duquesne Light’s

13.74-percent ownership of the Perry plant.

As a result of the asset transfer, FirstEnergy Corp.

subsidiaries will have 100-percent ownership of both Beaver

Valley and Perry.

Local 29 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical

Workers, which represents unionized employees at Beaver Valley,

filed a petition to intervene in the license transfer approval

process in June. On July 23, the Commission denied the union

local’s petition, but it referred Local 29's comments to NRC

staff for consideration during review of the application.

Subsequently, on September 15, Local 29 filed a petition

asking for a waiver of the time limits to submit comments on the

application. The Commission on September 24 granted a waiver of

the time limits and referred the union local’s comments to the
NRC staff for consideration.

Following a review of all the information before it, the

NRC determined that FirstEnergy is qualified to hold the licenses

and that the license transfers are consistent with agency

regulations.

FirstEnergy also operates the Davis-Besse nuclear power

plant in Ohio.

#
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-193 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, October 26, 1998)

NRC PLANT STATUS REPORT TO CHANGE FORMAT

As part of its effort to address the Year 2000 problem, the computer software

that generates the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s daily event and plant status

reports is being modified. The content will not be changed.

Most users who access these reports through the NRC’s Internet Homepage will

notice only minor formatting changes when the transition occurs October 28. Anyone

who experiences difficulty accessing these reports during the transition can call the

Office of Public Affairs at (301) 415-8200 or send an e-mail to: opa@nrc.gov for

assistance.

##
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of New Energy Systems Group, (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jufeng Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
  (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 28, 2011





/s/ Jufeng ChenJufeng Chen

Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Vim Electric Co., Inc., Appellant-Respondent. Retail & Wholesale Employees Union, Local 830, Respondent-Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lewis] P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 870.]
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-42 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.871 Leasing part of Project Property to another business. ( a ) The costs of interior finishing of space to be leased out to another business are not eligible Project costs.
( b ) Third-party loan proceeds used to renovate the leased space do not count towards the 504 first mortgage requirement or the Borrower's contribution.
#### Thomas H. West and Others v. Southern Railway Company and Others.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Opinion per curiam. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-066

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, April 30, 1997)

NRC PROPOSES TO ALLOW MORE LICENSEES

TO USE SELF-GUARANTEE FOR DECOMMISSIONING FUNDING

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is considering amending

its regulations to allow additional licensees who meet stringent

financial criteria to self-guarantee adequate funds for

decommissioning.

Since 1993, NRC regulations have permitted financially

strong for-profit corporate licensees (other than electric

utilities) with bond ratings of A or better to make use of a

procedure called "self-guarantee" to ensure that adequate funds

will be available for decommissioning.

Other methods--available to all licensees--include a surety

bond or letter of credit, prepayment, insurance, or external

sinking fund.

Under a self-guarantee, the licensee gives the Commission a

written commitment that the licensee will fund and carry out the

required decommissioning activities. Licensees who use this

option must pass an annual financial test and report promptly to

the NRC any deterioration in financial condition.

The proposed amendments could extend the option of using

self-guarantee to non-profit licensees, such as universities and

hospitals, and to for-profit licensees who do not issue bonds.

They would have to meet the following financial criteria:

--For colleges and universities, either (1) a bond rating of

A or better; or (2) for institutions that do not issue bonds, an

unrestricted endowment of at least $50 million or at least 30

times the estimated decommissioning costs, whichever is greater.

--For hospitals, either (1) a bond rating of A or better; or

(2) for hospitals that do not issue bonds, satisfaction of four

tests specified in the regulations for liquidity, net revenue,

leverage and size.

--For industrial corporations that do not issue bonds,
satisfaction of the following ratio tests: cash flow divided by

total liabilities would have to be greater than 0.15; total

liabilities divided by net worth would have to be less than 1.5;

and net worth would have to be greater than $10 million or at

least 10 times the estimated decommissioning costs, whichever is

greater.

The NRC estimates that 25 to 30 college and university

licensees, 10 to 14 hospitals, and two to four non-bond-issuing

industrial companies might qualify for self-guarantee.

Further details on the proposed rule are contained in a

Federal Register notice issued on April 30.

Interested persons are invited to submit comments by July 29

(90 days after the Federal Register notice). Written comments

should be addressed to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Attention: Rulemakings and

Adjudications Staff. Comments may also be submitted

electronically, as described in the Federal Register notice.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

KEY WEST DIVISION

CASE NO. 20-10057-CIV-KING/REID

HAROLD GLENN REECE, 

Plaintiff,

v.

MONROE COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the September 21, 2020 Report and 

Recommendation (“R&R”) (DE 14) of Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Plaintiff’s objections 

were due by October 5, 2020; none were filed. 

The R&R recommends dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) 

for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with Court Orders and that all pending motions

be denied as moot.

Upon consideration of the record and the R&R, the Court finds that Magistrate Judge 

Reid’s well-reasoned R&R accurately states the law of the case. Therefore, it is ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED and DECREED that: 

1. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid’s Report and Recommendation (DE 14) be, and the 

same is, hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of this Court; 

2. Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 

3. All pending motions are hereby DENIED AS MOOT; and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this case.

Case 4:20-cv-10057-JLK Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at the James Lawrence King Federal Justice 

Building and United States Courthouse, Miami, Florida, this 27th day of October, 2020.

______________________________

JAMES LAWRENCE KING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc:

All counsel of record

Case 4:20-cv-10057-JLK Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2020 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.768 Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment. ( a ) *General.* If the importer fails to comply with any requirement under this subpart, including submission of a complete declaration under § 10.764 of this subpart, when requested, the Center director may deny preferential tariff treatment to the imported good.
( b ) *Failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment.* Where the requirements for preferential tariff treatment set forth elsewhere in this subpart are met, the Center director nevertheless may deny preferential treatment to a good if the good is shipped through or transshipped in the territory of a country other than a Party, and the importer of the good does not provide, at the request of the Center director, evidence demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Center director that the good was imported directly from the territory of a Party into the territory of the other Party (*see* § 10.777 of this subpart).
Status Description (N/A) Not Available 129

‐ 28685 Not Available ABANDONED Abandoned ABANDONED LOCATION Abandoned Location ABANDONED, DRY HOLE Abandoned, Dry Hole AC Active ACTIVE Active ACTIVE GAS PROD Active Gas Production ACTIVE GAS STORAGE Active Gas Storage ACTIVE INJ Active Gas Storage APPLICATION Application APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DRILL Application for Permit to Drill AR Application Received to Drill/Plug/Convert AX P & A ‐ Approved BRINE WELL Brine Well CA Cancelled CANCEL Cancel CANCELED Canceled CANCELED, DRY HOLE Canceled, Dry Hole CANCELED, EXPIRED Canceled, Expired CANCELLED Cancelled CM Coalbed Methane CN Unknown CNF Unknown CO Unknown COMPLETED Completed COMPLETED ISSUED Completed Issued COMPLETED SERVICE Completed Service COMPLETED, GAS Completed, Gas COMPLETED, SERVICE Completed, Service CONSTRUCTION Construction CONVERTED Converted DC Drilling Completed DD Unknown DG Drilling in Progress DH Dry Hole DORMAN T Dormant DRILLED ABANDONED Drilled Abandoned DRILLED, SERVICE Drilled, Service DRILLING Drilling DRILLING ACTIVE Drilling Active DRILLING SUSPENDED Drilling Suspended DRL Drilling DRY Dry DRY HOLE Dry Hole EVALUATING Evaluating EX Expired Permit EXPIRED Expired EXPIRED PERMIT Expired PermitStatus Description FLOWING Flowing GAS LIFT Gas Lift GAS WELL Gas Well GAS WELL

‐ PA Gas Well

‐ Pa IN Inactive INACTIVE Inactive INCOMPLETE APPLICATION, WITHDR Incomplete Application, Withdr INJ Injection ISSUED Issued JA Junked and Abandoned MI Pending Mit MW Monitor Well ND New Drill NEW DRILL New Drill NL Unknown NO REPORT Denied or Cancelled NOT DRILLED Not Drilled NOTICE OF INTENT TO ABANDON Notice of Intent to Abandon NR No Report NTC TO ABAND Notice of Intent to Abandon OIL WELL Oil Well OIL WELL

‐ PA Oil Well

‐ Pa OR Orphaned ORND Unknown OTHER Other P & A Plugged and Abandoned P&A Plugged and Abandoned PA Plugged and Abandoned PB Unknown PBNM Unknown PENDING Pending PERMIT Permit PERMIT ISSUED Permit Issued PERMIT TO DRILL Permit Issued PERMITTED Permitted PI Permit Issued PLUGGED Plugged PLUGGED & ABANDONED Plugged and Abandoned PLUGGING/PLU Plugging/Plu PLUNGER LIF T Plugging/Plu PM Plugged Back Multilateral PR Pumping Rods PRODUCING Producing PW Permitted Well RC Recompleted Into New Formation RE Refunded Fee RECLASSIFIED TO ANOTHER TYPE OF ENTITY Reclassified to Another Type of Entity RELEASED Released RINAC UnknownStatus Description RMW Unknown SHUT IN Shut In SHUT

‐ IN Shut In SI Shut In SPUDDED Spudded SUBSEQUENT RPT OF ABANDONMENT Subsequent Report of Abandonment SUSP Suspended SUSPENDED Suspended SUSPENDED OPERATIONS Suspended SUSPENDED, GAS Suspended, Gas TA Temporarily Abandoned TES T Test TP Terminated Permit TR Transferred Permit UL Transferred Permit UM Transferred Permit UN Unknown UNKNOWN Unknown UNREPORTED S Unreported S UNREPORTED STATUS Unreported Status USED AS WATER Used as Water VA Unknown VENTING Venting VO Unknown VP Voided Permit WAITING Waiting WAITING ON APPROVAL Waiting on Approval WC Waiting Completion WELL SPUDDED Well Spudded WORKED OVER TO ANOTHER ZONE Worked Over to Another Zone WS Water Shut In WSW Water Supply Well
#### § 8224.0-1 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to provide procedures for the management and use of the public lands in the Fossil Forest of New Mexico.
No: 24-012 February 13, 2024 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Seeks Input, Offers Hearing Opportunity on Oconee Station

Subsequent License Renewal Draft Environmental Impact Statement

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on its draft site-specific 

environmental impact statement – called an EIS – for Duke Energy Carolinas’ application 

proposing a second renewal of the licenses for the Oconee Nuclear Station in Seneca, South 

Carolina. 

Duke is seeking a second, or subsequent, renewal of the plant’s licenses from 60 to 80 

years. The licenses for the three Oconee reactors currently expire in February 2033 for Unit 1, 

October 2033 for Unit 2, and July 2034 for Unit 3. 

The staff’s preliminary conclusion in the EIS is there are no adverse environmental 

impacts that would preclude the renewal of Oconee Station’s operating licenses for another 

20 years. The draft EIS is open for comments for 45 days after publication of a Federal Register 

notice, anticipated Feb. 16. 

The NRC staff will hold two public meetings on the draft EIS. The first meeting will be 

held Feb. 21 from 7-9 p.m. Eastern time at the Clemson University Conference Center, 

230 Madren Center Drive in Clemson, South Carolina. The staff will also hold an open house 

from 6-7 p.m. Eastern time for informal discussions with the public. The second meeting will be 

a webinar from 1-3 p.m. Eastern time on Feb. 27. At both meetings, the staff will discuss the 

environmental review process and accept comments on the draft EIS. 

Written comments can be submitted by email to OconeeEnvironmental@nrc.gov, or 

electronically at regulations.gov, using Docket ID “NRC-2021-0146.” Comments also can be 

submitted by U.S. Mail to Office of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Program Management, 

Announcements and Editing Staff. 

The NRC is also providing an opportunity to request an adjudicatory hearing on new 

information presented in the draft EIS. Interested parties have 60 days from today’s Federal 

Register notice to file a hearing request. 

A copy of Duke Energy’s subsequent license renewal environmental report supplement 

will be available for public review at the Seneca Branch of the Oconee County Public Library, 

300 E. South 2nd Street in Seneca, South Carolina. Information about the Oconee subsequent 

license renewal review is available on the NRC website.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-118 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, August 12, 1997)

NRC PROVIDES COMMENTS TO FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ON ITS DRAFT

OPINION

ON CLEANUP PLAN FOR UTAH URANIUM MILL TAILINGS SITE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has notified the U.S. Fish

and Wildlife Service that it has major concerns with the

scientific basis for the Service's draft biological opinion on

the proposed reclamation plan for the Atlas Corporation's uranium

mill tailings site in Moab, Utah.

Atlas, an NRC licensee, proposes to stabilize its mill

tailings on site. The NRC has not yet made a final determination

on whether the Atlas plan is acceptable.

The Fish and Wildlife Service's draft opinion states that

the Atlas Corporation's proposed action of reclaiming the mill

tailings at their present location would jeopardize the continued

existence of four endangered fish species in the Colorado River.

In addition, the Fish and Wildlife Service's draft document says

that relocation of the tailings to an alternate site outside the

Colorado River floodplain is the only reasonable and prudent

alternative to the proposed action.

In a letter transmitting NRC's comments on the draft, Carl

Paperiello, Director of the NRC Office of Nuclear Material Safety

and Safeguards, said the conclusions reached in the draft opinion

are not fully supported by the material presented in the draft

document. "In several instances," he wrote, "the draft

Biological Opinion does not consider the scientific analysis and

basis for findings documented by NRC in its supporting documents,

or assumes the NRC findings to be incorrect, without providing a

technical basis to refute those findings." He also wrote, "In at

least once instance, scientific findings by two other Federal

agencies, in addition to NRC, appear not to have been

considered."

The NRC will base its decision on whether to approve Atlas

Corporation's proposal for on-site reclamation on the results of

two NRC staff evaluations: a technical evaluation report and a

final environmental impact statement. The technical evaluation

report, issued in March, found that the company's plan to
stabilize the tailings in place was technically acceptable and

meets applicable federal standards. A draft environmental impact

statement was issued for public comment in January 1996. It

reached a preliminary conclusion that permanent disposal of

tailings on site was acceptable with respect to environmental

costs and benefits.

The Fish and Wildlife Service's biological opinion, when

issued in final form, will be the last piece of information that

NRC needs to complete its final environmental impact statement.

NRC will make its final decision on the Atlas proposal once that

statement is published.

A copy of the NRC's comments on the Fish and Wildlife draft

opinion will be available at the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L

Street, NW, Washington, DC 20555, and via an NRC web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports.

###
### §607. Practice of law prohibited

An officer or employee of the Administrative Office shall not engage directly or indirectly in the practice of law in any court of the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 915.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §445 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §303, as added Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 501, §1, 53 Stat. 1223).

This section contains the last paragraph of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §445. The remainder of said section is incorporated in sections 602 and 603 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JULY 11, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 11-11419

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cv-20963-MGC

MICHAEL RAMJEAWAN,

RITIE B. RAMJEAWAN,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(July 11, 2012)

Before EDMONDSON, MARTIN and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Plaintiffs MichaelRamjeawan and RitieB.Ramjeawan sued theDefendant

Bank of America, N.A. for negligence and civil theft. The case was tried to a jury,
which found in favor of the Ramjeawans on the negligence counts and awarded

compensatory damages in the amount of $528,531.01 and punitive damages in the

amount of $150,000.00. The jury found in favor of the Bank on the civil theft claim.

TheBank appeals, challenging the district court's denial ofthe Bank's post-trial

Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) motion for judgment as a matter of law, which alleged that the

Ramjeawans failed to present sufficient evidence to support the award of punitive

damages. We have considered the briefs of the parties and conclude that the district

court did not err in denying this motion.

The Bank also contends that the district court erred in denying the Bank's

requestfor attorney's fees because the civil theft claimwas withoutsubstantial factual

or legal support. We conclude that the denial of this motion did not constitute an

abuse of discretion.

AFFIRMED.

2
#### Alvah Armstrong, Respondent, v. Guy M. Hulin, Appellant.

(Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ. (Decided March 10, 1949; order entered March 10, 1949.)