alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT  21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
HYPERCOM CORPORATION

List of Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    NAME OF ENTITY                                                   JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION
<S>                                                                  <C>
    Hypercom (Arizona), Inc.                                         Arizona
    Hypercom U.S.A., Inc.                                            Delaware
    Hypercom Transaction Network, Inc.                               Arizona
    Golden Eagle Leasing, Inc.                                       Arizona
    Hypercom Horizon, Inc.                                           Missouri
    ePicNetz, Inc.                                                   Nevada
    Hypercom Manufacturing Resources, Inc.                           Arizona
    Hypercom Latino America, Inc.                                    Arizona
    Hypercom Canada Ltd.                                             Canada
    Hypercom de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                                 Mexico
    Hypercom de Chile, S.A.                                          Chile
    Netset Chile, S.A.                                               Chile
    Hypercom de Argentina                                            Argentina
    Hypercom de Venezuela                                            Venezuela
    Hypercom do Brasil Industria e Comercio Limitada                 Brazil
    Hypercom do Brasil Comercial Limitada                            Brazil
    Netset SP Tecnologia e Servicos em Teleinformatica Limitada      Brazil
    Schalter Eletronica Limitada                                     Brazil
    Aquarius Tecnologia e Informatica Limitada                       Brazil
    Hypercom Europe Limited, Inc.                                    Arizona
    Hypercom Gmbh                                                    Germany
    Hypercom France S.A.R.L.                                         France
    Hypercom Financial Terminals AB                                  Sweden
    Hypercom Hungary KFT                                             Hungary
    Hypercom Australia Pty., Ltd.                                    Australia
    Hypercom Net Transactions, Pty., Ltd.                            Australia
    Hypercom FSC, Inc.                                               Barbados
    Hypercom Far East Ltd.                                           Hong Kong
    Hypercom Asia Ltd.                                               Hong Kong
    Hypercom Network Systems Ltd.                                    Hong Kong
    Hypercom Asia (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.                              Singapore
    Hypercom (Thailand) Co., Ltd.                                    Thailand
    Hypercom Korea, Ltd.                                             Korea
    Hypercom Philippines                                             Philippines
    Hypercom Electronic Manufacturing (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.            China
    Hypercom China Co. Ltd.                                          Hong Kong
</TABLE>
'p

c, r. r/tsiAjL/f UfSt- Ca//Y//3

/Joo fr/*f &<T3~

To"* Ai>yt/ /bLOsr/t/COts-Jc. COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEA18

TfaAf Causer #£ de,+**,As^/Ayx*A FEB 24 2015

P.O&o* &3°S C^i^L S?*r»Xs Ab8sAcosta,C!ark

MOTION DENIED

DATE: 2?'^& foi\ &*/>j*tr/L fr/tU*f /&ir~S*+~r9«S BY: fY\

PGtytfA. £/*• ^v«* P"f<TM *~* ^^f •**=> **"L P^^

Ustfa tJa+r'oL ^0* ^TiCJ/L i<7fA>os^4*^SL &/CAx+ AYk^
/Ut//Lg 6/?/&/>£-LCf^r &&c^<?&**^. /2^/k. &3.J23J

Co-Use/- /^c /UL\///UcJ <9-*~0 Co^ss04c<L<?^ya+-*r « <3*s

S'upfeo+fe>£ &-p/>ltJ>s*h>^r Us',// s4&c«j ^r/L A/Aosm^

/Woho/<s u^t'fA &su<Lv /As Su/J/P&i-F''

en
4fr6*- ~{J//L pu/^J ce*siT 6rtf oL^r/4k^ J4&/-.//.

o&c^u/uLc/ /as pu&Y C&t^-r, sh^a 4&t, j4&s/i- /uaj<?a<£

\a£./r!r? STrt-ffccS S97*-*& £vte//£rKsC/L fi/CA-JP/CASffa?/ /fy/>kC4><sr

T,rV^cS/^^^ ^ ^^ c//^M^ J^ACPesr^S M»i/ £ok £isLu*fX-#' o^ &H -l¥~ t?//^ of

4/fiuCat /fe*^^C^S,y^

P-0. Bo*. fr20& G*P't*L Sfijj/Q^ (2 00 F**f- 6jrr

r> <r/ P/LO— S^C

ky/4 r/Qa/L£

/testsf DisTa^cS /lA^rUy

(0)
No: 23-008 February 7, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Issues Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

for SHINE Medical Technologies Operating License

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff have completed the final supplemental 

Environmental Impact Statement on SHINE Medical Technology, LLC’s, application for a 

license to operate a medical isotope production facility in Janesville, Wisconsin. The NRC staff 

has weighed the facility’s environmental, economic, technical and other benefits against 

environmental and other impacts, and recommends that, unless safety issues mandate otherwise, 

the license should be issued. 

The agency will consider both the EIS and the Final Safety Evaluation Report for the 

SHINE application in deciding whether to issue the license. 

SHINE filed the application on July 17, 2019, seeking the license to operate the facility, 

currently under construction in Janesville. The facility would create molybdenum-99, which 

subsequently produces technetium-99m, an isotope used in over 30 different diagnostic medical 

imaging procedures. Information on the operating license review, with proprietary details

removed, is available on the NRC website.
§ 142.8 What happens if program fraud is suspected? ( a ) If the investigating official concludes that an action under this part is warranted, the investigating official submits a report containing the findings and conclusions of the investigation to a reviewing official. The reviewing official is the General Counsel or his designee. If the reviewing official determines that the report provides adequate evidence that a person submitted a false claim or statement, the reviewing official transmits to the Attorney General written notice of an intention to refer the matter for adjudication, with a request for approval of such referral. This notice will include the reviewing official's statements concerning: ( 1 ) The reasons for the referral;
( 2 ) The claims or statements upon which liability would be based;
( 3 ) The evidence that supports liability;
( 4 ) An estimate of the amount of money or the value of property, services, or other benefits requested or demanded in the false claim or statement;
( 5 ) Any exculpatory or mitigating circumstances that may relate to the claims or statements known by the reviewing official or the investigating official; and
( 6 ) The likelihood of collecting the proposed penalties and assessments.
( b ) If at any time, the Attorney General or designee requests in writing that this administrative process be stayed, the Administrator must stay the process immediately. The Administrator may order the process resumed only upon receipt of the written authorization of the Attorney General.
#### Stephen K. Fox, as Surviving Partner, etc., Appellant, v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (TAP) will be discussing issues on IRS Customer Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, March 1, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Judi Nicholas at 1-888-912-1227, or 206-220-6096.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Monday, March 1, 2004 from 8 a.m. Pacific Time to 9 a.m. Pacific Time via a telephone conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or write to Judi Nicholas, TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174.

The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

Dated: January 30, 2004.

Bernard Coston,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 04-2302 Filed 2-3-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 126
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 126.402 When will SBA conduct program examinations? ( a ) SBA may conduct a program examination at any time after the concern submits its application, during the processing of the application, and at any time while the concern is a certified HUBZone small business concern.
( b ) SBA will conduct program examinations periodically as part of the recertification process set forth in § 126.500.
( c ) Upon receipt of specific and credible information alleging that a certified HUBZone small business concern no longer meets the eligibility requirements for continued program eligibility, SBA will examine the concern's eligibility for continued participation in the program.
[84 FR 65245, Nov. 26, 2019]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-252

November 30, 1999

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY SAFETY REVIEW

TEAM TO VISIT NORTH ANNA NUCLEAR PLANT

At the invitation of the United States, a nuclear safety team from the International

Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna, Austria, will visit the North Anna Nuclear Station near

Louisa, Virginia, from January 24 through February 10 to review operational safety practices.

The visit of an IAEA Operational Safety Review Team (OSART) will be the fourth to visit

a commercial nuclear power plant in the United States. Such an IAEA team also has visited the

Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant in Maryland, in August of 1987, the Byron nuclear power plant

in Illinois, in May of 1989, and the Grand Gulf facility in Mississippi, in August of 1992.

The purpose of the OSART program, established by the IAEA in 1982, is to assist

Member States in enhancing the operational safety of nuclear power plants and to promote the

continuous development of operational safety within all Member States by the dissemination of

information on good practices.

The 11-member team will include nuclear experts from the IAEA staff and from France,

the United Kingdom, Japan, Sweden, Germany, Belgium, Slovenia and the Slovak Republic. In

addition, observers from Russia, Mexico and Switzerland will accompany the team.

The visit will provide team members with an opportunity to exchange safety ideas and

experiences with their counterparts at the North Anna plant. The team’s review will cover eight

operating areas: management; training and qualification of control room staff, maintenance

and radiation protection personnel; operating performance and procedures; maintenance

programs; technical support programs; radiation protection; plant chemistry; and emergency

planning and preparedness.

The team will subsequently produce a report identifying good practices, as well as

suggesting possible safety improvements. The report will be provided to the operator of North

Anna, Virginia Electric & Power Company, and the U.S. government.

Such OSART inspections are conducted around the world on a regular basis.

###
May 2, 2008

Mr. James Goldstene Executive Officer California Air Resources Board 1001 "I" Street P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95812

Dear Mr. James Goldstene:

Enclosed is the State Impl ementation Plan (SIP) Package for the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Cont rol District (District) 2008 PM2.5 Plan . The District Governing Board adopted the 2008 PM2.5 Plan at a public hearing held on April 30, 2008. We request that the California Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit this plan and the appropriate documentation to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a SIP revision.

Included in this SIP Package ar e the following attachments: 1. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 2. The 2008 PM2.5 Plan 3. Evidence of Public Hearing 4. Governing Board Resolution Adopting the 2008 PM2.5 Plan 5. Public Comments 6. Additional Materials (Governing B oard Report, Initial Study for CEQA)

If you have any questions regarding this plan, please contact Donald Hunsaker by email at Donald.Hunsaker@valleyair.org or at (559) 230-5800. The District thanks you and your staff for your assistance.

Sincerely,

Scott Nester Director of Planning

Attachments

cc: S. Zulawnick
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DANIEL C. KOSCHER
, Appellant,

v.

MARCIE KOSCHER
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2090

[ November 27, 2019 ]

Appeal and cross

- appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Andrea Gundersen , Judge; L.T. Case

No. FMCE 13

- 001703

.

Michael L. Lundy and Kim A. Hamill of Older, Lundy & Alvarez, Attorneys at Law, Tampa, for appellant.

Terrence P. O'Connor of Morgan. Carratt & O'Connor , P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 312.7 Eligible project activities. ( a ) Activities eligible for a RIS Program grant include: ( 1 ) Feasibility studies;
( 2 ) Planning activities;
( 3 ) Technical assistance;
( 4 ) Developing or strengthening communication and collaboration between and among participants of a regional innovation cluster;
( 5 ) Attracting additional participants to a regional innovation cluster;
( 6 ) Facilitating market development of products and services of a regional innovation cluster, including through demonstration, deployment, technology transfer, and commercialization activities;
( 7 ) Developing relationships between a regional innovation cluster and entities or clusters in other regions;
( 8 ) Interacting with the public and State and local governments to meet the goals of the regional innovation cluster;
( 9 ) Purchase of equipment and equipment-related modifications or renovations of a facility, but only to the extent that such equipment and any related modifications or renovations are used to support another eligible activity as described in this section (the recipient may be required to secure and record the Federal interest in the equipment); and
( 10 ) Any other activity determined appropriate by the Assistant Secretary and consistent with section 27(b) of Stevenson-Wydler.
( b ) An ineligible activity includes, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) Use of Federal funds or matching share for equity investments;
( 2 ) Acquisition or improvement of real property;
( 3 ) Construction except to the extent provided in paragraph (a)(9) of this section; and
( 4 ) Lending programs, such as a direct loan program or capitalizing a revolving loan fund.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            1379
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           1362
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             1379
<EQUITIES>                                       176
<MORTGAGE>                                         0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  1568
<CASH>                                            47
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                 9
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                            58
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  2578
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 1322
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              381
<POLICY-OTHER>                                     3
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                              7
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                       715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    2578
<PREMIUMS>                                       626
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                               64
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                14
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     1
<BENEFITS>                                       461
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      123
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                              45
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   77
<INCOME-TAX>                                      16
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               62
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                      62
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      2
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      2
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  1292
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              487
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                               (26)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               253
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 202
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 1322
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                           24
        


</TABLE>
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-1/November%202012/P-11-0060/p110060.eng.txt[12/6/2012 8:47:11 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0060 Focus Ready Draft 11/22/2010 ENGINEER: Macek \ EV PV (kg/yr):file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-1/November%202012/P-11-0060/p110060.eng.txt[12/6/2012 8:47:11 AM] Consumer Use: No SAT (concerns) (11/16/2010): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Ecotox Related Cases: Analogs: Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P3B1T1 PMN - P1B1T1; Hyd Pdt - P3B1T1 Health: 1 Not Required Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 61 ppb.) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: NR NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-1/November%202012/P-11-0060/p110060.eng.txt[12/6/2012 8:47:11 AM] assessed in this IRER (none required, per SAT). POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: No Pollution Prevention information provided by the submitter. EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0060

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation:file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-1/November%202012/P-11-0060/p110060.eng.txt[12/6/2012 8:47:11 AM] Dermal: Exposures not required, per SAT.

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0060

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium. Water or Incineration or Landfill Output 1: 4.0E-1 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 10 sites or 10.0E+2 kg/yr Output 2: 2.0E+0 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 10 sites or 5.0E+3 kg/yr

Water or Incineration or Landfill High End: 6.2E+0 kg/site-day over 24 days/yr from 10 sites or 1.5E+3 kg/yrfile:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-1/November%202012/P-11-0060/p110060.eng.txt[12/6/2012 8:47:11 AM] RELEASE TOTAL 6.5E+3 kg/yr - all sites
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:
§ 60.1 Purpose of subpart. ( a ) The Act provides that flood insurance shall not be sold or renewed under the program within a community, unless the community has adopted adequate flood plain management regulations consistent with Federal criteria. Responsibility for establishing such criteria is delegated to the Federal Insurance Administrator.
( b ) This subpart sets forth the criteria developed in accordance with the Act by which the Federal Insurance Administrator will determine the adequacy of a community's flood plain management regulations. These regulations must be legally-enforceable, applied uniformly throughout the community to all privately and publicly owned land within flood-prone, mudslide (i.e., mudflow) or flood-related erosion areas, and the community must provide that the regulations take precedence over any less restrictive conflicting local laws, ordinances or codes. Except as otherwise provided in § 60.6, the adequacy of such regulations shall be determined on the basis of the standards set forth in § 60.3 for flood-prone areas, § 60.4 for mudslide areas and § 60.5 for flood-related erosion areas.
( c ) Nothing in this subpart shall be construed as modifying or replacing the general requirement that all eligible communities must take into account flood, mudslide (i.e., mudflow) and flood-related erosion hazards, to the extent that they are known, in all official actions relating to land management and use.
( d ) The criteria set forth in this subpart are minimum standards for the adoption of flood plain management regulations by flood-prone, mudslide (i.e., mudflow)-prone and flood-related erosion-prone communities. Any community may exceed the minimum criteria under this part by adopting more comprehensive flood plain management regulations utilizing the standards such as contained in subpart C of this part. In some instances, community officials may have access to information or knowledge of conditions that require, particularly for human safety, higher standards than the minimum criteria set forth in subpart A of this part. Therefore, any flood plain management regulations adopted by a State or a community which are more restrictive than the criteria set forth in this part are encouraged and shall take precedence.
[41 FR 46975, Oct. 26, 1976. Redesignated at 44 FR 31177, May 31, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 44552, Sept. 29, 1983; 49 FR 4751, Feb. 8, 1984]