alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

 

No. 09-2667

CAROLINE DELIA,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.,

Defendant, Appellee,

VERIZON INFORMATION SERVICES INC.; VERIZON SUPERPAGES;

IDEARC MEDIA CORP.; VERIZON DIRECTORIES SERVICES - EAST INC.,

n/k/a Idearc Media Services - East Inc.; MALVERN SMALLWOOD;

Defendants.

 

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on August 24, 2011 is amended

as follows:

On the coversheet replace " Thomas H. Winter" with "Thomas H. 

Wintner"
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

December 11, 2001 Session

MARY HENRY, et al. V. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY

CONSULTANTS, P.C., et al.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County

No. 1-185-98 Hon. Dale C. Workman, Judge

FILED FEBRUARY 8, 2002

No. E2001-01246-COA-R3-CV 

CONCURRING OPINION

The expert witness whose testimony was excluded because we found he was not

competent to testify pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. §29-26-115, and case law interpreting the statute,

nevertheless is a specialist in his field of medical practice and competent to treat patients. A review

of the case law dealing with the mentioned statute, reveals tortured analyses in determining whether

the physician is competent to testify as an expert witness.

As Judge Goddard’s Opinion notes, this witness testified there is a national standard

of care for training purposes in the medical schools, and he was of the further opinion that health

care provided by medical specialists “does not vary from community to community”.

In my view, the General Assembly should revise Tenn. Code Ann. §29-26-115, and

bring it in compliance with how physicians are being trained and how health care is being

administered to patients in this State.

_________________________

HERSCHEL PICKENS FRANKS, J.
### §130b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 130b was editorially reclassified as section 4503 of this title.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-154 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, October 16, 1997)

NRC TO HOLD NOVEMBER WORKSHOP TO DISCUSS DRAFT DOCUMENTS

ON RISK-INFORMED PIPING INSPECTION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a workshop

November 19-20 in Bethesda, Maryland, to obtain public comment on

two draft documents concerning an alternative method for

periodically inspecting piping in operating nuclear power plants.

Workshop sessions will begin at 8 a.m. daily at the Bethesda

Marriott Hotel, 5151 Pooks Hill Road.

Documents to be discussed at the workshop are a draft

regulatory guide and a draft standard review plan for the use of

licensees who want to utilize "risk-informed" inspections of

nuclear power plant piping. With this approach, licensees would

give priority to inspecting piping segments with a relatively

higher safety significance.

Those who intend to participate in the workshop are asked to

give advance notification in writing to the workshop contractor,

Kesselman-Jones, 8912 James Ave. NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico

87111. Kesselman-Jones also may be contacted by phone (505/271-

0003); by fax (505/271-0482); or by electronic mail

(kessjones@aol.com).

Free single copies of both the draft regulatory guide and

standard review plan may be obtained by writing to the Printing,

Graphics and Distribution Branch, U.S Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001 or by faxing a letter to

301/415-5272. Copies are also available for inspection and

copying for a fee at the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street

N.W. (Lower Level), Washington, DC 20555-0001. Electronic copies

are accessible on the NRC's interactive rulemaking web site

through the NRC Internet home page (http://www.nrc.gov).

Members of the public also may comment in writing. Comments

are due by January 13 of next year. Written comments should be

mailed to: Rules and Directives Branch, Office of

Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,

DC 20555-0001.
###
Editorial Note on Part 124
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 124 appear at 72 FR 50040, Aug. 30, 2007, and 76 FR 8253, Feb. 11, 2011.

§ 124.511 How is fair market price determined for an 8(a) contract? ( a ) The procuring activity determines what constitutes a “fair market price” for an 8(a) contract. ( 1 ) The procuring activity must derive the estimate of a current fair market price for a new requirement, or a requirement that does not have a satisfactory procurement history, from a price or cost analysis. This analysis may take into account prevailing market conditions, commercial prices for similar products or services, or data obtained from any other agency. The analysis must also consider any cost or pricing data that is timely submitted by SBA.
( 2 ) The procuring activity must base the estimate of a current fair market price for a requirement that has a satisfactory procurement history on recent award prices adjusted to ensure comparability. Adjustments will take into account differences in quantities, performance, times, plans, specifications, transportation costs, packaging and packing costs, labor and material costs, overhead costs, and any other additional costs which may be appropriate.
( b ) Upon the request of SBA, a procuring activity will provide to SBA a written statement detailing the method it has used to estimate the current fair market price for the 8(a) requirement. This statement must be submitted within 10 working days of SBA's request. The procuring activity must identify the information, studies, analyses, and other data it used in making its estimate.
( c ) The procuring activity's estimate of fair market price and any supporting data may not be disclosed by SBA to any Participant or potential contractor.
( d ) The concern selected to perform an 8(a) contract may request SBA to protest the procuring activity's estimate of current fair market price to the Secretary of the Department or head of the agency in accordance with § 124.505.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-190 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 4
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-190 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of 4
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-190 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 3 of 4
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-190 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 4 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 20-cv-81205-RAR 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

 

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC, 

et al., 

Defendants. 

________________________________________________/ 

PLAINTIFF SECURITY AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S NOTICE 

REGARDING RECEIVER, RYAN K. STUMPHAUZER’S THIRTIETH MOTION TO LIFT 

LITIGATION INJUNCTION AS TO CERTAIN GARNISHMENT PROCEEDINGS 

 On February 1, 2024, the Receiver filed a Thirtieth Motion to Lift Litigation Injunction as to 

Certain Garnishment Proceedings [ECF No. 1795]. As noted in the Certificate of Conferral, the 

Receiver did not confer with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to filing the Motion. 

 In the Motion, the Receiver seeks “to lift the litigation injunction provided for in that Order for 

certain garnishment matters currently pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, 

Pennsylvania to be opened for the limited purpose to authorize the Receiver, in his direction, to dissolve 

current writs of garnishment, to mark judgments satisfied, and/or to reopen confessed judgments.” 

(emphasis added). 

 Litigation concluded in this case in November 2022 against all parties litigating the 

Commission’s claims against them. The Receiver will be consenting to the Final Judgment on behalf 

of the receivership entities, and claims were submitted by investors last year. Thus, the receivership 

should be winding down so that distributions can be made. The Receiver’s Motion seeks leave to 

reopen confessed judgments, which indicates potential additional litigation or collections efforts by the 

Receiver. The Commission would like to confer with the Receiver about what, if any, litigation would 

occur if the Motion is granted, the expenditure of additional funds for legal and other fees and the 

amount the Receiver anticipates collecting (a cost-benefit analysis on the use of investor funds in the 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1796 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 1 of 2
1

Receivership), and the extent to which such matters could prolong the receivership and the distribution 

to investors. 

 The Commission learned about the relief sought in the Motion upon reading it after it was filed. 

Accordingly, the Commission intends to confer with the Receiver’s counsel and will then file either a 

notice that we have no objection to the relief sought or a response to the Motion. 

For all future Motions filed by the Receiver, the Receiver’s counsel should confer with 

undersigned counsel for the Commission prior to filing. 

 February 2, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

s/Amie Riggle Berlin 

Amie Riggle Berlin, Esq. 

Senior Trial Counsel 

Florida Bar No. 630020 

Direct Dial: (305) 982-6322 

Direct email: berlina@sec.gov 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Securities And Exchange Commission 

 801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1950 

 Miami, Florida 33131 

 Telephone: (305) 982-6300 

 Facsimile: (305) 536-4154 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1796 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-75344), Form S-8(No. 333-97435), Form S-8 (No. 333-108373), Form S-8 (No. 333-124465),and Form S-8 (No. 333-124466) of MedicalCV, Inc. of our reportdated July 8, 2005 relating to the financial statements which appears inthis Form 10-KSB.

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota         |
| July 21, 2005             |

 

----
Second Amendment



  
 Exhibit 10.80 
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 GALEY
& LORD RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN (401(k)) 
  
 WHEREAS, Galey & Lord, Inc. (the “Company”)
maintains The Galey & Lord Retirement Savings Plan (401(k)), most recently amended and restated as of January 1, 2000 (the “Plan”). 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE,
the Plan is amended as follows: 
  
 I.    Section 3.2(a) of the Plan is amended
in its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 (a)    At any time during the Plan
Year, the Administrative Committee may limit the percentage of Compensation that may be contributed for the benefit of Highly Compensated Employees. If the percentage of Compensation that may be contributed for the benefit of one or more Highly
Compensated Employees is limited in accordance with this subsection for the Plan Year, the limit applied to each such Highly Compensated Employee shall be deemed to be the “employer-provided limit”, as provided in Section 1.414(v)-1(b)(ii)
of the proposed regulations issued by the Department of Treasury on October 21, 2001 and reported at 66 FR 53555, and 
  
 II.    Unless otherwise provided, this Second Amendment is effective as of January 1, 2002. 
  
 III.    Unless otherwise amended herein, the provisions of the Plan are hereby ratified and confirmed. 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT IS EXECUTED this 10th day of October, 2002. 
  
 
	 GALEY & LORD, INC.
 
	  
	 By:
 	 	 /s/    LEONARD F. FERRO
§ 330.2 Policies. ( a ) The authority of subsection 101(c) of the Act to require the allocation of, or priority performance under contracts or orders relating to, supplies of materials and equipment to maximize domestic energy supplies shall be limited to those exceptional circumstances when it is found that: ( 1 ) Such supplies of material and equipment are scarce, critical, and essential; and
( 2 ) The maintenance or furtherance of exploration, production, refining, transportation, or conservation of energy supplies, or the construction and maintenance of energy facilities, cannot reasonably be accomplished without exercising this authority.
( b ) The authority contained in subsection 101(c) shall not be used to require priority performance under contracts or orders relating to, or the allocation of, any supplies of materials and equipment except for programs or projects to maximize domestic energy supplies as specifically determined by the Secretary of Energy, after coordination with the Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
( c ) The allocation of, or priority performance under contracts or orders relating to, supplies of materials and equipment in support of authorized programs or projects shall be so undertaken as to ensure that: ( 1 ) Supplies of the specified materials and equipment are available to the extent practicable on time and in proper quantity to authorized programs or projects.
( 2 ) The demands of these authorized programs or projects are distributed among suppliers on a fair and equitable basis.
( 3 ) Allotments of supplies of materials and equipment are not made in excess of actual current requirements of these authorized programs or projects.
( 4 ) Fulfillment of the needs of these authorized programs and projects are achieved in such manner and to such degree as to minimize hardship in the market place.
( d ) The authority of subsection 101(c) of the Act will not be used to control the general distribution of any supplies of material and equipment in the civilian market, as that phrase is used in subsection 101(b) of the Act, except after Presidential approval as required by subsection 7(d) of Executive Order 11912.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.101 Immediate delivery. ( a ) *Shipments entitled to immediate delivery.* Shipments consigned to or for the account of any agency or office of the United States Government, or to an officer or official of any such agency in his official capacity, shall be regarded for purposes of these regulations as shipments the immediate delivery of which is necessary within the purview of section 448(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1448(b)).
( b ) *Immediate delivery applications.* The shipments described in the preceding paragraph may be released upon the filing of immediate delivery applications on Customs Form 3461, or its electronic equivalent, as set forth in subpart A of part 142 of this chapter. Such applications may be limited to particular shipments or may cover all shipments imported by the Government agency making the application. They may be approved for specific periods of time or for indefinite periods of time, provided in either case they are supported by carrier's certificates and stipulations as provided for in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Carrier's certificates and stipulations.* Before the release of a shipment under an immediate delivery permit, evidence of the right of the applicant to make entry for the articles shall be furnished the port director in accordance with the provisions of §§ 141.11 and 141.12 of this chapter.
( d ) *Bond.* No bond shall be required in support of an immediate delivery application provided for in this section if a stipulation in the form as set forth below is filed with the port director in connection with the application: I, ________, ________ (Title), a duly authorized representative of the

(Name of United States Government department or agency) stipulate and agree on behalf of such department or agency that all applicable provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and the regulations thereunder, and all other laws and regulations, relating to the release and entry of merchandise will be observed and complied with in all respects. (Signature)
( e ) *Timely entries required.* If proper entries for consumption for importations released under these regulations are not filed within a reasonable time, appropriate steps shall be taken to insure the prompt filing of such entries.
[T.D. 77-23, 42 FR 2310, Jan. 11, 1977, as amended by T.D. 87-75, 52 FR 20067, May 29, 1987; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61284, Oct. 13, 2015]
§ 206.16 Audit and investigations. ( a ) Subject to the provisions of chapter 75 of title 31, United States Code, and 2 CFR parts 200 and 3002, relating to requirements for single audits, the Administrator, the Assistant Administrator for the Disaster Operations Directorate, or the Regional Administrator shall conduct audits and investigations as necessary to assure compliance with the Stafford Act, and in connection therewith may question such persons as may be necessary to carry out such audits and investigations.
( b ) For purposes of audits and investigations under this section, FEMA or State auditors, the Governor's Authorized Representative, the Administrator, the Regional Administrator, the Assistant Administrator for the Disaster Assistance Directorate, the DHS Inspector General, and the Comptroller General of the United States, or their duly authorized representatives, may inspect any books, documents, papers, and records of any person relating to any activity undertaken or funded under the Stafford Act.
[55 FR 2288, Jan. 23, 1990, as amended at 74 FR 15346, Apr. 3, 2009; 79 FR 76085, Dec. 19, 2014]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsElectrical conductivity of rocks at high pressures and temperaturesThe results of studies of the electrical conductivity in the most widely distributed types of igneous rocks, at temperatures of up to 1200 C, at atmospheric pressure, and also at temperatures of up to 700 C and at pressures of up to 20,000 kg/sq cm are described. The figures of electrical conductivity, of activaation energy and of the preexponential coefficient are presented and the dependence of these parameters on the petrochemical parameters of the rocks are reviewed. The possible electrical conductivities for the depository, granite and basalt layers of the Earth's crust and of the upper mantle are presented, as well as the electrical conductivity distribution to the depth of 200 to 240 km for different geological structures.Document ID19860014589Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeBookAuthorsParkhomenko, E. I.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Bondarenko, A. T.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1986Subject CategoryGeophysicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:77687NASA-TM-77687Accession Number86N24060Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-4005Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860014589.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 4874] 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459),Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 (68 FR 19875), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Iraq and China: Ceramics and Innovation,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owners. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, from on or about December 4, 2004, to on or about April 24, 2005, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State (telephone: (202) 619-6981). The address is Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: October 12, 2004. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 04-23589 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
#### § 305.11 Contract awards; early construction start.

EDA must determine that the award of all contracts necessary for design and construction of the Project facilities is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Investment award in order for the costs to be eligible for EDA reimbursement. Pending this determination, the Recipient may issue a notice permitting construction under the contract to commence. If construction commences prior to EDA's determination, the Recipient proceeds at its own risk until EDA review and concurrence. The EDA regional office will advise the Recipient of the requirements necessary to obtain EDA's determination.
### §1842. Conversion of existing pay rates

The Architect of the Capitol shall convert, as of the effective date of this section, to a single per annum gross rate, the rate of pay of each employee described in subparagraph (1) or subparagraph (2) of section 1841 of this title, whose pay immediately prior to such effective date was fixed at a basic rate with respect to which additional pay was payable by law.

(Pub. L. 91–510, title IV, §482, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1196.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The effective date of this section, referred to in text, means immediately prior to noon on Jan. 3, 1971. See section 601(1) of Pub. L. 91–510, set out as an Effective Date of 1970 Amendment note under section 4301 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 166b–1b of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.