alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.923 Policies on subordination. ( a ) Financing provided by the seller of Project Property must be subordinate to the 504 loan. SBA may waive the subordination requirement if the property is classified as “other real estate owned” by a national bank or other Federally regulated lender and SBA considers the property to be of sufficient value to support the 504 loan.
( b ) A Borrower is eligible for a 504 loan even if part of the Project financing is tax-exempt. SBA's lien position must not be subordinate to loans made from the proceeds of the tax-exempt obligation.
( c ) The Borrower must not prepay any Project financing subordinate to the 504 loan without SBA's prior written consent.
[61 FR 3235, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 68 FR 57988, Oct. 7, 2003]
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-97-81 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Thursday, November 20, 1997)

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE

TO DISCUSS ROBINSON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ISSUES WITH CP&L

Meeting In Atlanta On November 25 Will Be Open To Public For Observation

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a predecisional

enforcement conference with officials of Carolina Power & Light Company in

Atlanta from 2:00 to 4:00 p.m. on November 25 to discuss apparent violations of

NRC requirements related to the inoperability of one of two emergency diesel

generators at the H. B. Robinson nuclear power plant, located near Hartsville,

South Carolina.

NRC officials said two apparent violations were associated with the fact

that an NRC resident inspector on August 20 identified that one of the plant’s

emergency diesel generators was inoperable because a breaker control switch was

mispositioned.

No accident occurred, but NRC officials said mispositioning of the emergency

diesel generator breaker switch would have complicated the plant’s ability to

respond to certain postulated emergencies.

The meeting will be held in the NRC’s regional office located on the 24th

floor of the Atlanta Federal Center at 61 Forsyth Street, S. W. The meeting is

between the NRC and CP&L but is open to public observation, and NRC officials

will be available at its conclusion to answer questions from interested

observers.

NRC officials said the decision to hold a predecisional enforcement

conference does not mean that a determination has been made that a violation has

occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. The purpose of the conference

is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; the

provide the licensee an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been

made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable the company to outline its

proposed corrective actions. No decision on the apparent violations or any

contemplated enforcement action, such as a civil penalty, will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made later by senior NRC officials.
#

EDITORS: Recorded information on all upcoming NRC predecisional enforcement

conferences may be obtained by ling 1-800-952-9674. A copy of the inspection

report upon which this predecisional conference is based is available by request

at the above mail, E-mail , telephone or fax address.

#
§ 6.20 Conditions of disclosure. No employee of FEMA shall disclose any record to any person or to another agency without the express written consent of the subject individual unless the disclosure is: ( a ) To officers or employees of FEMA who have a need for the information in the official performance of their duties;
( b ) Required by the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552.
( c ) For a routine use as published in the notices in the Federal Register;
( d ) To the Bureau of the Census for use pursuant to title 13, United States Code;
( e ) To a recipient who has provided FEMA with advance adequate written assurance that the record will be used solely as a statistical research or reporting record subject to the following: The record shall be transferred in a form that is not individually identifiable. The written statement should include as a minimum ( 1 ) a statement of the purpose for requesting the records; and
( 2 ) certification that the records will be used only for statistical purposes. These written statements should be maintained as accounting records. In addition to deleting personal identifying information from records released for statistical purposes, the system manager shall ensure that the identity of the individual cannot reasonably be deduced by combining various statistical records;
( f ) To the National Archives of the United States as a record which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation by the United States Government, or for evaluation by the Administrator of The National Archives and Records Administration or his designee to determine whether the record has such value;
( g ) To another agency or instrumentality of any governmental jurisdiction within or under the control of the United States for civil or criminal law enforcement activity, if the activity is authorized by law, and if the head of the agency or instrumentality or his designated representative has made a written request to the Administrator specifying the particular portion desired and the law enforcement activity for which the record is sought;
( h ) To a person showing compelling circumstances affecting the health and safety of an individual to whom the record pertains. (Upon such disclosure, a notification must be sent to the last known address of the subject individual.)
( i ) To either House of Congress or to a subcommittee or committee (joint or of either House, to the extent that the subject matter falls within their jurisdiction;
( j ) To the Comptroller General or any duly authorized representatives of the Comptroller General in the course of the performance of the duties of the Government Accountability Office; or
( k ) Pursuant to the order of a court of competent jurisdiction.
( l ) To consumer reporting agencies as defined in the Fair Credit Reporting Act (35 U.S.C. 1681a(f) or the Debt Collection Act of 1982 (31 U.S.C. 3711(d)(4)).
[44 FR 50293, Aug. 27, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 44543, Sept. 29, 1983; 50 FR 40006, Oct. 1, 1985]
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 453 Unemployed Number in thousands 65 years and over 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU03000097Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Unemployment Lev el - 65 yrs. & over

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:09:58 PM)
Editorial Note on Part 126
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 126.101 Which government departments or agencies are affected directly by the HUBZone program? ( a ) The HUBZone Program applies to all federal departments or agencies that employ one or more contracting officers.
( b ) The HUBZone program does not apply to contracts awarded by state and local governments. However, state and local governments may use the List of certified HUBZone small business concerns to identify certified HUBZone small business concerns for similar programs authorized under state or local law.
[63 FR 31908, June 11, 1998, as amended at 66 FR 4645, Jan. 18, 2001; 69 FR 29420, May 24, 2004; 84 FR 65239, Nov. 26, 2019]
§ 500.207 Application evaluation. ( a ) *Eligibility screening.* Applications will be reviewed to determine whether the Lender and Borrower are eligible, the information required under § 500.205(b) is complete, and the proposed loan complies with applicable statutes and regulations. The Board can at any time reject an application that does not meet these requirements.
( b ) *Evaluation criteria.* Applications that are determined to be eligible pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section shall be subject to a substantive review, on a competitive basis, by the Board based upon the following evaluation factors, in order of importance: ( 1 ) The ability of the Borrower to repay the loan by the date specified in the Loan Document, which shall be no later than December 31, 2010;
( 2 ) The adequacy of the proposed provisions to protect the Government, including sufficiency of Security, the priority of the lien position in the Security, and the percentage of Guarantee requested; and
( 3 ) Adequacy of the underwriting analysis performed by the Lender in preparing the application and the ability of the Lender to administer the loan in full compliance with the requisite standard of care set forth in § 500.211(b).
( c ) *Decisions by the Board.* Upon completion of the evaluation of the application and as soon as possible after the due date, the Board will approve or deny all eligible applications timely received under this Program. The Board shall notify all Applicants in writing of the approval or denial of the Guarantee applications as soon as possible. Approvals for loan Guarantees shall be conditioned upon compliance with § 500.208.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4321

_____________________________

T.M., Mother of A.M. and S.M.,

Minor Children,

Appellant,

v.

GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM,

and DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN 

AND FAMILIES,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County.

Michael S. Sharrit, Judge.

March 29, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and LEWIS and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

T.M., pro se, Appellant.

Ward L. Metzger, Department of Children and Families, 

Jacksonville; Thomasina F. Moore and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb of 

Florida Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee; Jamie 

B. Moses of Holland & Knight LLP, Orlando, for Appellees.
### §1511. Cost of regulations

#### (a) Sense of Congress

It is the sense of the Congress that Federal agencies should review and evaluate planned regulations to ensure that the cost estimates provided by the Congressional Budget Office will be carefully considered as regulations are promulgated.

#### (b) Statement of cost

At the request of a committee chairman or ranking minority member, the Director shall, to the extent practicable, prepare a comparison between—

(1) an estimate by the relevant agency, prepared under section 1532 of this title, of the costs of regulations implementing an Act containing a Federal mandate; and

(2) the cost estimate prepared by the Congressional Budget Office for such Act when it was enacted by the Congress.

#### (c) Cooperation of Office of Management and Budget

At the request of the Director of the Congressional Budget Office, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall provide data and cost estimates for regulations implementing an Act containing a Federal mandate covered by part B of title IV of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 [2 U.S.C. 658 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 104–4, title I, §103, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 62.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, referred to in subsec. (c), is Pub. L. 93–344, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 297. Part B of title IV of the Act is classified generally to part B (§658 et seq.) of subchapter II of chapter 17A of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 621 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 104–4, title I, §110, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 64, provided that: "This title [enacting this subchapter and sections 658 to 658g of this title and amending sections 602, 632, and 653 of this title] shall take effect on January 1, 1996 or on the date 90 days after appropriations are made available as authorized under section 109 [2 U.S.C. 1516], whichever is earlier and shall apply to legislation considered on and after such date."
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 635 

To reauthorize The Last Green Valley National Heritage Corridor and the 

Upper Housatonic Valley National Heritage Area, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2021 

Mr. MURPHY (for himself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Mr. MARKEY) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize The Last Green Valley National Heritage 

Corridor and the Upper Housatonic Valley National Heritage Area, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘The Last Green Valley 

5 National Heritage Corridor and the Upper Housatonic 

6 Valley National Heritage Area Reauthorization Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 635 IS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE LAST GREEN VALLEY 

2 NATIONAL HERITAGE CORRIDOR AND THE 

3 UPPER HOUSATONIC VALLEY NATIONAL HER4 ITAGE AREA. 

5 (a) LAST GREEN VALLEY NATIONAL HERITAGE

6 CORRIDOR.— 

7 (1) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 106(b) of the 

8 Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National 

9 Heritage Corridor Act of 1994 (54 U.S.C. 320101 

10 note; Public Law 103–449; 108 Stat. 4755; 113 

11 Stat. 1728; 123 Stat. 1291; 128 Stat. 3802) is 

12 amended by striking ‘‘2021’’ and inserting ‘‘2036’’. 

13 (2) REPEAL OF TOTAL FUNDING CAP.—Section 

14 109(a) of the Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Val15 ley National Heritage Corridor Act of 1994 (54 

16 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 103–449; 108 Stat. 

17 4756; 113 Stat. 1729; 123 Stat. 1292) is amended 

18 by striking the second sentence. 

19 (b) UPPER HOUSATONIC VALLEY NATIONAL HERIT20 AGE AREA.— 

21 (1) REPEAL OF TOTAL FUNDING CAP.—Section 

22 280A(a) of the Upper Housatonic Valley National 

23 Heritage Area Act (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public 

24 Law 109–338; 120 Stat. 1819) is amended by strik25 ing the second sentence. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 635 IS

1 (2) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 280B of the 

2 Upper Housatonic Valley National Heritage Area 

3 Act (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 109–338; 

4 120 Stat. 1819) is amended by striking ‘‘15 years’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘30 years’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.3



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Paperweight Development Corp. (the
Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                               |  |                                        
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|                      |  | PAPERWEIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORP.
|Dated: March 24, 2005 |  |                               |  |                                        
|                      |  | /s/ Douglas P. Buth          
|                      |  | Name:                         |  | Douglas P. Buth                        
|                      |  | Title:                        |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive
|                      |  |                               |  | Officer                                



This certification accompanies this
Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



3
#### § 295.36 Confidentiality of information.

Confidential information submitted by individual Claimants is protected from disclosure to the extent permitted by the Privacy Act. These protections are described in the Privacy Act Notice provided with the Notice of Loss. Other Claimants should consult with FEMA concerning the availability of confidentiality protection under exemptions to the Freedom of Information Act and other applicable laws before submitting confidential, proprietary or trade secret information.
### §1340. Internal revenue; customs duties

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress providing for internal revenue, or revenue from imports or tonnage except matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 932; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §501(21), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1742.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(5) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 5, 36 Stat. 1092; Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 488, §1, 45 Stat. 1475).

Words "Customs Court" were substituted for "Court of Customs and Patent Appeals." Section 41(5) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., is based on the Judicial Code of 1911. At that time the only court, other than the district courts, having jurisdiction of customs cases, was the Court of Customs Appeals which became the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in 1929. The Customs Court was created in 1926 as a court of original jurisdiction over customs cases. (See reviser's note preceding section 251 of this title.)

Words "any civil action" were substituted for "all cases" in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–417 redesignated the Customs Court as the Court of International Trade.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980, and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Jay Miranda

, * From the 104th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 20545B

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 207

- CR * August 30, 2019

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Stretcher , J. , and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has considered Jay Miranda’s motion to dismiss his appeal and

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
§ 63.11 Requirement for a commitment before October 1, 1989. The requirement in section 1306(c)(7) of the Act that a commitment be made on or before September 30, 1989 as a necessary condition to making any payments after September 30, 1989, is met if before October 1, 1989, ( a ) There is either a condemnation in accordance with § 63.2 of this part or a certification in accordance with subpart B of this part, and
( b ) A policyholder's notice of claim for benefits under section 1306(c) of the Act is received by the insurer.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.83 Bond; cancellation; extension. ( a ) If it shall appear to the satisfaction of the Center director holding the bond referred to in § 10.80, that the entire quantity of salt covered by the bond has been duly accounted for, either by having been used in curing fish or by the payment of duty, the Center director may cancel the charges against the bond. The Center director may require additional evidence in corroboration of the proof of use produced.
( b ) On application of the person making the withdrawal, the period of the bond may be extended 1 year so as to allow the salt to be used during the time of extension in curing fish with the same privileges as if used during the original period.
[28 FR 14663, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 87-75, 52 FR 20067, May 29, 1987]
### §8. Unemployment data relating to Americans of Spanish origin or descent

The Department of Labor, in cooperation with the Department of Commerce, shall develop methods for improving and expanding the collection, analysis, and publication of unemployment data relating to Americans of Spanish origin or descent.

(Pub. L. 94–311, §1, June 16, 1976, 90 Stat. 688.)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInteraction of acoustic waves generated by coupled plateWhen two substructures are coupled, the acoustic field generated by the motion of each of the substructures will interact with the motion of the other substructure. This would be the case of a structure enclosing an acoustic cavity. A technique to model the interaction of the generated sound fields from the two components of a coupled structure, and the influence of this interaction on the vibration of the structural components is presented. Using a mobility power flow approach, each element of the substructure is treated independently both when developing the structural response and when determining the acoustic field generated by this component. The presence of the other substructural components is introduced by assuming these components to be rigid baffles. The excitation of one of the substructures is assumed to be by an incident acoustic wave which is dependent of the motion of the substructure. The sound field generated by the motion of the substructure is included in the solution of the response.Document ID19900018148Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCuschieri, J. M.*(Florida Atlantic Univ. Boca Raton, FL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186873NAS 1.26:186873Accession Number90N27464Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-1077Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900018148.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024