alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.11






 Exhibit 10.11 

EXECUTION VERSION 
 TERMINATION
AGREEMENT 
 This TERMINATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered as of [●], 2021, by and between Agilon Health
Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a CD&R Vector Topco, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Primary Provider Management Co., Inc., a California corporation (“Opco”) and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (“CD&R Manager”). 
 WHEREAS, the parties hereto are party to a Consulting
Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2016 (the “Consulting Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to terminate
the Consulting Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and agreements set forth herein and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

Section 1. Termination of Consulting Agreement. Notwithstanding any provision of the Consulting Agreement to the contrary
(including any provisions that purport to survive the termination thereof), effective as of the date hereof, the Consulting Agreement is hereby terminated without any obligation surviving such termination. Each party hereto hereby waives any notice,
consent or other requirement in connection with such termination of the Consulting Agreement. As a matter of precaution each party hereto waives, effective as of the date hereof, any claims it may have against the other party under the Consulting
Agreement. 
 Section 2. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York, without regard to
the principles of conflicts of law thereof. 
 Section 3. Binding on Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure
to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 
 Section 4. Counterparts. This Agreement may
be executed in counterparts (including via facsimile or scanned pages), each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

[Signature page follows] 













 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first above
written. 
  

					
	CLAYTON, DUBILIER & RICE, LLC
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Name:	 	Theresa A. Gore
		 	Title:	 	Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
	
	AGILON HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Name:	 	Kenneth Bellendir
		 	Title:	 	Vice President and Secretary
	
	PRIMARY PROVIDER MANAGEMENT CO., INC.
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Name:	 	Kenneth Bellendir
		 	Title:	 	Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary


 [Signature Page to Termination Agreement (for CD&R Consulting Agreement)]
### §3131. Funding of State and local boards

#### (a) State boards

In funding a State board under this part, a State—

(1) shall use funds available as described in section 3164(b)(3) or 3174(a)(3)(B) of this title; and

(2) may use non-Federal funds available to the State that the State determines are appropriate and available for that use.

#### (b) Local boards

In funding a local board under this part, the chief elected official and local board for the local area—

(1) shall use funds available as described in section 3163(b)(4) of this title; and

(2) may use non-Federal funds available to the local area that the chief elected official and local board determine are appropriate and available for that use.

(Pub. L. 113–128, title I, §111, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1471.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
### §1164. Applicable premium

For purposes of this part—

#### (1) In general

The term "applicable premium" means, with respect to any period of continuation coverage of qualified beneficiaries, the cost to the plan for such period of the coverage for similarly situated beneficiaries with respect to whom a qualifying event has not occurred (without regard to whether such cost is paid by the employer or employee).

#### (2) Special rule for self-insured plans

To the extent that a plan is a self-insured plan—

#### (A) In general

Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the applicable premium for any period of continuation coverage of qualified beneficiaries shall be equal to a reasonable estimate of the cost of providing coverage for such period for similarly situated beneficiaries which—

(i) is determined on an actuarial basis, and

(ii) takes into account such factors as the Secretary may prescribe in regulations.

#### (B) Determination on basis of past cost

If an administrator elects to have this subparagraph apply, the applicable premium for any period of continuation coverage of qualified beneficiaries shall be equal to—

(i) the cost to the plan for similarly situated beneficiaries for the same period occurring during the preceding determination period under paragraph (3), adjusted by

(ii) the percentage increase or decrease in the implicit price deflator of the gross national product (calculated by the Department of Commerce and published in the Survey of Current Business) for the 12-month period ending on the last day of the sixth month of such preceding determination period.

#### (C) Subparagraph (B) not to apply where significant change

An administrator may not elect to have subparagraph (B) apply in any case in which there is any significant difference, between the determination period and the preceding determination period, in coverage under, or in employees covered by, the plan. The determination under the preceding sentence for any determination period shall be made at the same time as the determination under paragraph (3).

#### (3) Determination period

The determination of any applicable premium shall be made for a period of 12 months and shall be made before the beginning of such period.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §604, as added Pub. L. 99–272, title X, §10002(a), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 229.)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50444 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE JESUS GONZALEZ-ARREOLA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-2212-ALL-DB

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Jesus Gonzalez-Arreola concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### The William H. Geer Company, Respondent, v. J. W. Matthews & Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER I—CONGRESSIONAL AWARD PROGRAM
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40105 Summary Calendar

MIGUEL ANGEL MADRIGAL , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. GARY CURRIE; OLIVER J. BELL; BRAD LIVINGSTON; BRYAN COLLIER , Defendant s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:13

- CV

- 321

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Miguel Angel Madrigal, Texas prisoner # 580267, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for damages and injunctive relief against several employees of the Texas Dep artment of Criminal Justice wherein he alleged that they failed to protect him from an assault during which he was seriously injured by his
cellmate. He also alleged that his property was lost or stolen. Madrigal consented to proceed before the magistrat e judge, who held a hearing pursuant

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 19, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40105 Document: 00512775193 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/19/2014No. 14

- 40105

to Spears v. McCotter , 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985). The magistrate judge dismissed the complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Our review is de novo. See Black v. Warren , 134 F.3d 732, 733

- 34 (5th Cir. 1998). Although this court construes the briefs of pro se litigants liberally, an appellant’s brief must contain an argument on the issues that are raised so
that th is court may know what action of the district court is complained of. Al

Ra’id v. Ingle , 69 F.3d 28, 31 (5th Cir. 1995). Conclusory statements of the type found in Madrigal’s brief are insufficient, even for a pro se appellant. See Brinkmann v. Dallas C nty Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2 d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as frivolous. 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2; Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219

- 20 (5th Cir. 1983). Th is dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) , and Madr igal is warned that if he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g) ; Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387

- 88 (5th Cir. 1996). APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

2 Case: 14-40105 Document: 00512775193 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/19/2014
#### Peter J. Malley, Respondent, v. John F. Arthur, Appellant.

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

Consent of Independent Auditors 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-51116, 33-39557, 33-39556, 333-17843) pertaining to the Kaiser SteelResources, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, the Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Officer Bonus Program, the Amended, Restated and Substituted Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Stock Plan, and the Kaiser Ventures Inc. 1995 Stock Plan, as amended,respectively, of Kaiser Ventures LLC of our report dated February 12, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Kaiser Ventures LLC and Subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2003. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Ernst & Young LLP 

 

March 25, 2004
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

DEBORAH ENGLE Case No: 1:20-CV-22556-MGC 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ROYAL BAHAMIAN ASSOCIATION, INC. 

a Florida corporation; RENOVATIONS 

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Florida 

limited liability Company; PATRICIA 

GILLILAND, an individual, 

Defendants. 

__________________________________________/ 

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

The Parties, Plaintiff Deborah Engle, and Defendants, Royal Bahamian Association, 

Inc., Renovations Property Management, LLC, and Patricia Gilliland, hereby advise the 

Court that they have reached an agreement to settle Plaintiff’s claims in the instant case 

pending execution of a Settlement Agreement. The Parties will file a Stipulation dismissing 

this Action with prejudice once the Settlement Agreement is executed, which they reasonably 

expect to do no later than 45 days from the date of this Notice. Accordingly, the Parties, 

respectfully request that the Court vacate all currently set dates and deadlines. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Respectfully submitted this 5th day of October 2021. 

/s/Gregory M. Ochalek, J.D. 

Gregory M. Ochalek, Esq., 

19553 NW 2nd Avenue, 

Suite 217 

Miami, FL 33169 

Phone: 305.329.4590 

Fax: 305.329.4591 

ochaleklaw@gmail.com

Counsel for Plaintiff Deborah Engle 

/s/Maritza Gomez___ 

Maritza Gomez, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 21663 

mgomez@kdvlaw.com

Cristina Hernandez-Villar, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 102305 

cvillar@kdvlaw.com

KAUFMAN DOLOWICH & VOLUCK, LLP 

One Financial Plaza 

100 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 1500 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 

Telephone: (954) 302-2360 

Fax: (888) 464-7982 

Case 1:20-cv-22556-MGC Document 151 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2021 Page 1 of 2
2 

Counsel for Defendant Royal Bahamian 

Association Inc. 

/s/Edward S. Polk 

Edward S. Polk, Esq., 

Florida Bar No.: 239860 

edward.polk@csklegal.com

Haley N. Kornfield, Esq., 

Florida Bar No.: 111580 

haley.kornfield@csklegal.com

COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. 

Cole, Scott & Kissane Building 

9150 South Dadeland Blvd., Suite 1400 

Miami, Florida 33256 

Telephone (305) 350-5338 

Facsimile (305) 373-2294 

Counsel for Defendants Renovations Property 

Management and Patricia Gilliland 

Case 1:20-cv-22556-MGC Document 151 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2021 Page 2 of 2
### §1029. Forms

#### (a) Information required on forms

Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the Secretary may require that any information required under this subchapter to be submitted to him, including but not limited to the information required to be filed by the administrator pursuant to section 1023(b)(3) and (c) of this title, must be submitted on such forms as he may prescribe.

#### (b) Information not required on forms

The financial statement and opinion required to be prepared by an independent qualified public accountant pursuant to section 1023(a)(3)(A) of this title, the actuarial statement required to be prepared by an enrolled actuary pursuant to section 1023(a)(4)(A) of this title and the summary plan description required by section 1022(a) of this title shall not be required to be submitted on forms.

#### (c) Format and content of summary plan description, annual report, etc., required to be furnished to plan participants and beneficiaries

The Secretary may prescribe the format and content of the summary plan description, the summary of the annual report described in section 1024(b)(3) of this title and any other report, statements or documents (other than the bargaining agreement, trust agreement, contract, or other instrument under which the plan is established or operated), which are required to be furnished or made available to plan participants and beneficiaries receiving benefits under the plan.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §109, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 850.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Regulations

Secretary authorized, effective Sept. 2, 1974, to promulgate regulations wherever provisions of this subchapter call for the promulgation of regulations, see section 1031 of this title.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-22775-CIV-ALTONAGA/Goodman

VICTOR ARIZA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

FRC BALANCE, LLC

Defendant.

_____________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, VICTOR ARIZA ("Plaintiff"), pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby voluntary dismisses with prejudice Defendant, FRC BALANCE, 

LLC, as to all claims in this action.

Dated: October 1, 2020

Respectfully submitted,

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO

Counsel for Plaintiff DURAN, P.A.

4800 North Hiatus Road Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

Sunrise, Fl 33351-7919 4640 N.W. 7th Street

T. 954/362-3800 Miami, FL 33126-2309

954/362-3779 (Facsimile) T. 305/266-9780 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com 305/269-8311 (Facsimile)

Email: duranandassociates@gmail.com 

By____s/ Roderick V. Hannah __ By ___s/ Pelayo M. Duran ______

RODERICK V. HANNAH PELAYO M. DURAN

Fla. Bar No. 435384 Fla. Bar No. 0146595

Case 1:20-cv-22775-CMA Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020 Page 1 of 1
```

[110th Congress Public Law 222]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ222.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 735]]

Public Law 110-222
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 201 West Greenway Street in Derby, Kansas, as the ``Sergeant Jamie O. 
  Maugans Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: May 7, 2008 -  [H.R. 5135]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SERGEANT JAMIE O. MAUGANS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 201 West Greenway Street in Derby, Kansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant Jamie O. Maugans Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Jamie O. Maugans Post Office Building''.

    Approved May 7, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5135 (S. 2675):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Feb. 12, considered and passed House.
            Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,515,244
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,131,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  7,971,461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,946,046
<PP&E>                                      16,813,948
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,972,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,246,901
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,986
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,272,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                58,972,633
<SALES>                                     56,275,511
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            56,275,511
<CGS>                                       47,007,109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,007,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,186,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             851,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,257,406
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,207,143
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,050,263
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,050,263
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46


</TABLE>
#### Saul J. Baron v. Andrew Albright, Jr., Impleaded, etc.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-98-24 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Thursday, March 26, 1998)

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $5,500 FINE AGAINST KENTUCKY

ENGINEERING AND TESTING FIRM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $5,500 civil penalty

against Ground Engineering and Testing Service, Inc. of Louisville, Kentucky for

violations of NRC requirements related to the use of radioactive material in areas under

NRC jurisdiction without an NRC license.

Ground Engineering and Testing Service is authorized under a license issued by

Kentucky to use portable moisture/density gauges at temporary job sites. Kentucky is

an NRC agreement state, meaning it regulates radioactive material use at most

locations within its borders through an agreement with the NRC. However, an NRC

inspection found that in 1997 the company had conducted activities at Fort Knox in

Kentucky, a federal facility under NRC jurisdiction, and in West Virginia and Indiana,

two states where radioactive material users are regulated by the NRC. The company

was required to obtain an NRC license for the work at Fort Knox and in the other two

states and did not do so.

The base civil penalty for this violation is $2,750, but in this case it was doubled

because the violation was identified by the Commonwealth of Kentucky and the NRC,

and because the company continued to use the gauges for six days after being notified

by the NRC of the failure to obtain the license.

At a previous meeting with the NRC, the company indicated it intended to file the

necessary documents to obtain a proper NRC license before using radioactive material

in an area of NRC jurisdiction.

The company has 30 days from receipt of the Notice of Violation to either pay

the fine or protest its imposition.

#
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-67 June 17, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

PLEASE NOTE CORRECTION TO LOCATION OF SECOND MEETING

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold two

meetings with Northeast Utilities (NU) on Thursday, June 19.

At the first meeting, which begins at 9:00 a.m., the two

will discuss the system boundaries for the selected systems for

the Millstone Unit 3 Independent Corrective Action Verification

Program. This meeting will be held at the Millstone Simulator

and Training Facility at the Millstone site in Waterford, Ct.

The NRC staff and NU will discuss NU’s final corrective

plans, actions, and schedules for resolution of Thermo Lag fire

barrier issues at Millstone Unit 2. The meeting will be held at

1:00 p.m. at NRC Headquarters in Rockville, Md.

Both meetings are open to the public for observation only.

#
#### § 15.1 Applicability.

The rules and regulations in this part apply to all persons entering, while on, or leaving all the property known as the Mt. Weather Emergency Operations Center (Mt. Weather) located at 19844 Blue Ridge Mountain Road, Bluemont, Virginia 20135, and all the property known as the National Emergency Training Center (NETC), located on 16825 South Seton Avenue in Emmitsburg, Maryland, which the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) owns, operates and controls.