alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq*. (“the Act”), ASTM International—Intellectual Property Policy (“ASTM-IPP”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

                    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: ASTM International—Intellectual Property Policy, west Conshohocken, PA. The nature and scope of ASTM-IPP's standards development activities are: ASTM International develops standrds in over 130 areas covering subjects including consumer products, medical services and devices, electronics, metals, paints, plastics, textiles, petroleum, construction, energy and the environment. ASTM International, as part of its standards development activities, has promulgated and adopted an Intellectual Property Policy as described in the Act (publicly available at                     *http://www.astm.org/​Itpolicy.pdf*.                 

                    For additional information, please contact: Thomas B. O'Brien, Jr., General Counsel, ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA, telephone no. (610) 832-9597, e-mail address                     *tobrien@astm.org*.                 

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. 

[FR Doc. 04-23535  Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-149 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, August 20, 1998)

NRC CLOSES SPECIAL PROJECTS OFFICE OVERSEEING MILLSTONE REACTORS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has closed the Special Projects Office

(SPO) within the headquarters Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation that has been

overseeing the Millstone nuclear power plants operated by Northeast Utilities

Now that Millstone Unit 3 has restarted after a 27-month shutdown, the

inspection functions that had been performed by the special projects office since

October 1996 will return to more normal oversight by the NRC’s Region I Office in King

of Prussia, Pennsylvania.

Officials at NRC headquarters in Rockville, Maryland, will continue to oversee

licensing and technical reviews, including oversight of the Millstone independent

corrective action verification program, as well as the licensee’s employee concerns

program and safety conscious work environment programs, probably until Unit 2 is

restarted.

The NRC has previously used special projects offices to oversee regulatory

activities at the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant in Texas and all of the Tennessee

Valley Authority’s nuclear plants in the 1980s.

##
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) releases a portion of the NRC’s 

Scenario Authoring, Characterization and Debriefing Application (SACADA) database available 

to the public. SACADA collects the licensed operator performance information in simulator 

training and experiments collected. The released data are in the SACADA database until March 

2019.

This information in this release includes five Excel files, each contains the performance 

statistics and corresponding contexts of a macrocognitive function. The five macrocognitive 

functions are: detecting-alarms, reading meters’ indications, diagnosing the situation, deciding 

the situation response paths, and implementing actions. The context is characterized by a set 

of performance influencing factors. In the Excel files, each row represents a context. The last 

two columns are the performance statistics, which includes the number of unsatisfactory 

performance and the number of trials. The quantification unit in SACADA is the Training 

Objective Element (TOE). The following show two malfunctions and their corresponding TOEs:

Standby Transformer Trouble:

• Respond to the main control room alarm ABC

• Dispatch operator to the local panel to check the alarm

• Prepare to transfer loads from the standby transformer

• Make appropriate notification 

Emergency Diesel Generator Sequencing Failure during a Small Loss of Coolant Accident

(SLOCA)

• Identify the emergency diesel generator X failed to load

• Manually start the emergency cooling water Pump per available train or manually Trip 

Diesel Generator prior to any of the following occurring:

o Diesel Generator trip

o Exiting emergency operating procedure – 0 during a loss of coolant accident, 

main steamline break, or steam generator tube rupture

• Reduce steam generator pilot operated relief valve (SG PORV) or Steam Dump set point 

to XYZ psig within 45 minutes of initiation of a SLOCA.

• Declares ALERT per the corresponding emergency action level instruction, due to a loss 

(or potential loss if subcooling is maintained) of the reactor system barrier.

• ESTABLISH charging flow per the procedure addendum ABC.

The SACADA data taxonomy is described in “Chang, Y.J., et al., The SACADA Database for 

Human Reliability and Human Performance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 

2014(125): p. 117-133.” Questions? Please contact Y. James Chang at 

James.Chang@nrc.gov.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



 
 

Exhibit 10(f)    
  


 
 

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO    
    
    HAGGAR CORP.    
    
    1992 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN    
    



          1.      Introduction. The Haggar Corp. 1992 Long Term Incentive Plan (as
amended, the "1992 Plan") was
initially approved and adopted by the stockholders of Haggar Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on November 13, 1992. A First Amendment to Haggar Corp. 1992 Long Term Incentive Plan
was approved and adopted by the stockholders of the Company on February 24, 1994. A Second Amendment to Haggar Corp. 1992 Long Term Incentive Plan was approved and adopted by the stockholders
of the Company on February 5, 1995. A Third Amendment to Haggar Corp. 1992 Long Term Incentive Plan was approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on February 10,
1999. Pursuant to Section 17, the 1992 Plan is hereby further amended as set forth herein. 


          2.      Increase in Available Shares. For the purpose of increasing the maximum number of shares of the
Common Stock of the Company available for issuance under the 1992 Plan by 350,000 shares, Paragraph 5 of the 1992 Plan is amended by substituting the number "1,750,000" for the number
"1,400,000" in each place where the latter number occurs in said Paragraph 5. 


          3.      Effect on Other Provisions. Except as expressly amended hereby, the 1992 Plan shall remain in
full force and effect as originally adopted and previously amended. 


          4.      Adoption by Board. The foregoing amendments to the 1992 Plan were adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Company on November 2, 1999. 


1









QuickLinks



Exhibit 10(f)


FOURTH AMENDMENT TO HAGGAR CORP. 1992 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
#### C. Elaine KIRKWOOD, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 06-3020.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 6, 2006.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.1310 Who can file a response to an appeal petition and when must such a response be filed? ( a ) *Who may respond.* Although not required, any person served with an appeal petition may file and serve a response supporting or opposing the appeal if he or she wishes to do so. The response should present arguments related to the issues presented on appeal.
( b ) *Time limits.* If a person decides to file a response, the response must be filed within fifteen (15) business days after service of the appeal petition.
( c ) *Service.* The respondent must serve its response upon the appellant and upon each of the persons identified in the certificate of service attached to the appeal petition pursuant to § 134.1305.
( d ) *Reply to a response.* No reply to a response will be permitted unless the Judge directs otherwise.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-12 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Thursday, April 1, 1999)

NRC FINDS PERFORMANCE ‘ACCEPTABLE’

AT ROBINSON IN LATEST REVIEW

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance

remains acceptable in the NRC’s latest plant performance review at the Robinson

nuclear power plant, operated by Carolina Power & Light Company near Hartsville,

South Carolina.

In a letter to CP&L, NRC official Brian Bonser said overall performance was

acceptable and “the plant continued to be operated in a safe manner.” Bonser noted

that “nuclear safety continued to be emphasized by plant management and was an

integral part of the decision-making process.”

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region

II Office of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power

plant in the nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of

plant performance and provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are being used as an interim measure to monitor

nuclear power plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after

suspending the Systematic Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a

new assessment program is developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every

12 to 24 months.

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will

provide quarterly performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators

and on inspection findings. This program will be tested at eight sites beginning in June

and will be extended to all plants next January. A full description of the new program is

available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

#
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 99-30 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson August 22, 1999

OFFICE: 817-860-8128

NRC MONITORS HURRICANE BRET

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is monitoring storm preparations at South

Texas Project, a twin reactor site near Bay City, Texas, as Hurricane Bret approaches the Texas

Gulf coast.

NRC Region IV has staffed its Incident Response Center in Arlington, Texas, and sent an

additional inspector to STP to join the three resident inspectors already on duty at the site.

While the worst of the storm is not expected to hit the reactor site at this hour, safety

procedures require the plant to begin shutting down should winds be projected to reach 73 miles

per hour. Other preparations such as securing loose equipment and making sure adequate

supplies and personnel are available have already been completed by STP Nuclear Operating

Company, the plant’s operator.

Safe operation of the plant remains the responsibility of the STP Nuclear Operating

Company. The NRC’s role is to monitor events for compliance with safety procedures and

advise the operator if necessary.

###
EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-51116, 33-39557, 33-39566, 333-17843) pertaining to the Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, the Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Officer Bonus Program, the Amended,
Restated and Substituted Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Stock Plan, and the Kaiser Ventures Inc. 1995 Stock Plan, as amended, respectively, of our report dated March 21, 2007 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule
of Kaiser Ventures LLC and Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                  
|------------------
|                  
|/s/ Moss Adams LLP
|                  
|Irvine, California
|August 6, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 20-cv-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC.

d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al. 

Defendants, 

and 

THE LME 2017 FAMILY TRUST, a/k/a

LME 2017 FAMILY TRUST,

Relief Defendant.

______________________________________________/

DEFENDANT, MICHAEL C. FURMAN’S NOTICE OF APPEAL

Defendant, Michael C. Furman (“Mr. Furman”) files this Notice of Appeal of the Final 

Judgment [ECF No. 1103], and Order Denying Mr. Furman’s Motion for a New Trial [ECF No. 

1271]. 

Respectfully submitted, 

MILLENNIAL LAW, INC.

Attorneys for Michael C. Furman

501 E. Las Olas Blvd Ste 200/308

Fort Lauderdale Fl 33301

Phone: 954-271-2719

By: s/ Zachary P. Hyman

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1317 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

Zachary P. Hyman

Florida Bar No. 98581

zach@millenniallaw.com

jessica@millenniallaw.com

assistant@millenniallaw.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 18th day of July, 2022, the foregoing was filed using 

the Court’s CM/ECF Filing system which will transmit Notices of Electronic Filing generated by 

CM/ECF to all counsel of record. 

By: s/ Zachary P. Hyman

Zachary P. Hyman

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1317 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2022 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 97-34 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson June 11, 1997

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

DIXON-HERRITY ASSUMES SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR POST

AT GRAND GULF NUCLEAR PLANT

Jennifer Dixon-Herrity has assumed the post of senior resident inspector for the U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission at the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station near Port Gibson, Miss. She will

report for duty on June 16.

Prior to this assignment, Ms. Dixon-Herrity served as a resident inspector at the Wolf Creek

nuclear plant near Burlington, Kansas, since 1994, and at the Waterford 3 nuclear plant near

Taft, Louisiana, from 1992 to 1994. She joined the NRC as a reactor engineer in 1990.

Ms. Dixon-Herrity earned a B.S. in Marine Engineering from the U.S. Merchant Marine

Academy in Kings Point, N.Y., in 1985, and worked as a marine engineer before joining the

NRC. She attended high school in Montville, Conn., and her family resides in Uncasville, Conn.

Ms. Dixon-Herrity will live in the area near Grand Gulf with her husband, Thomas, and their

children, Patrick, 5, and Shannon, 3.
:i

j l 1 

# I I 

# l 

# l l l 

## l i I I i I ! U.S. Department Assistant Secretary of Transportation Office ofthe Secretary ofTransportation

Ms. Connie Ware President/CEO Marshall, Texas Chamber ofCommerce 208 E. Burleson Marshall, TX 75670 Dear Ms. Ware: 

## AUG 26 2013 .-_i L :·: 1200 New Jersey Avenue. SE

· ·__; Washington. DC 20590

Thank you for your letter, addressed to Secretary Foxx, supporting the proposal submitted by the Shreveport Airport Authority for a grant under the U.S. Department ofTransportation's Small Community Air Service Development Program. Secretary Foxx has asked that I respond to you on his behalf. The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of40 grant awards each year, although no more than four awards may be to communities in the same State. In order to provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types ofprojects that can be funded. On June 24, the Department issued an order requesting that communities interested in receiving a grant this year file their applications by July 26. As these grant requests are pending before the Department, I cannot comment on the merits ofany particular propo,sal. I assure you that the Department will give full and fair consideration to all proposals that have been properly 

### filed. As is our standard practice, I am placing a copy ofyour letter and this response in Docket DOT-OST-2013-0120 as a contact outside the record ofthis matter. I appreciate your interest in this program. Sincerely yours,

Susan 

### L. Kurland Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International AffairsJuly 17, 2013 The HonorableAnthony FolOC Secretary,

### u.s. DepartmentofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAve., SE Washington, D.C. 20590 Dear**Secret;~r)f** Foxx, We are wtiting in supportofanyand all consideration you areableto give the Shreveport Airport;Authority regarding expanded airline service through a new route to the Midwest and/orAtlantic region. The Shreveport Regional Airport is an**esse~tial** cog in transportation in our part ofthe country, and creation of a routeto many ofthe Midwest or Atlantic airports would assist in thegrowing economy ofEastTexas, Shreveport and Northern Louisiana and Arkansas aswell. Marshall relies heavily on the Shreveport Regional Airportfor access to other parts ofthe country and to foreign areas, and the growth of routes and access would benefit us gteatly. We are in hopes thatyou will lookfavorably on the expanded routes in the current requests and in the future aswell.

Thank you foryour consideration. Sincerely, 

### ConnieWare President/CEO Marshall, Texas Chamber ofCommerce

208 E. Burleson Marshall, Texas 75670 903·935·7868 FAX903·935-9982 cware@gower.net

30
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.805 Importer obligations. ( a ) *General.* An importer who makes a claim for preferential tariff treatment under § 10.803 of this subpart: ( 1 ) Will be deemed to have certified that the good is eligible for preferential tariff treatment under the BFTA:
( 2 ) Is responsible for the truthfulness of the information and data contained in the declaration provided for in § 10.804 of this subpart; and
( 3 ) Is responsible for submitting any supporting documents requested by CBP and for the truthfulness of the information contained in those documents. CBP will allow for the direct submission by the exporter or producer of business confidential or other sensitive information, including cost and sourcing information.
( b ) *Information provided by exporter or producer.* The fact that the importer has made a claim for preferential tariff treatment or prepared a declaration based on information provided by an exporter or producer will not relieve the importer of the responsibility referred to in paragraph (a) of this section.
§ 123.20 How long do I have to request an increase in the amount of a physical disaster loan or an economic injury loan? ( a ) You should request a loan increase as soon as possible after you discover the need for the increase, but not later than two years after SBA approved your physical disaster or economic injury loan. After two years, the SBA Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance (AA/DA) may waive this limitation after finding extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances.
( b ) For physical disaster loan increases requested under § 123.18(b) as a result of malfeasance, the request must be received not later than two years after the date of final disbursement.
[63 FR 15073, Mar. 30, 1998, as amended at 81 FR 67903, Oct. 3, 2016]
(37310.

#### The People *ex rel.*Illinois Commerce Commission, Appellant, *vs.*Gerald J. Galvin, d/b/a Jerry’s Bus Service, Appellee.

*Opinion filed November 30, 1962.*

William G. Clark, Attorney General, of Springfield, (Edward V. Hanrahan, Special Assistant Attorney General, of counsel,) for appellant.

Robert J. O’Rourke and Donald A. Carr, of Chicago, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Schaefer

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an action by the People, on the relation of the Illinois Commerce Commission, to enjoin Gerald J. Galvin, doing business as “Jerry’s Bus Service,” from operating a bus service for the transportation, for hire, of high school students to and from six high schools in Cook County, without having received authority to do so from the Illinois Commerce Commission. The facts were not disputed, and the question for determination is whether under the Public Utilities Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1961, chap, 1112/3, par. 10.3) the defendant is a public utility, and is therefore required to secure a certificate of convenience and necessity.

*342The trial court denied the commission’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. The Commission has appealed directly to this court on the grounds that the revenue is involved and that the State of Illinois has a direct interest. The parties have not suggested how this case could involve the revenue, and we have been unable to discover any theory upon which it could be said to be involved. Nor is the fact that the action was prosecuted in the name of the People, on the relation of the Commission, sufficient to give us jurisdiction upon direct appeal. As we said in *Illinois Bell Telephone Co.*v. *Commerce Com.*302 Ill. 468, 470: “The State is interested in a suit only when it has a direct and substantial interest in the outcome. *(Hodge*v. *People,*96 Ill. 423; *People*v. *Continental Beneficial Ass’n,*280 id. 113.) The interest must not be a mere nominal'interest but must be an interest of the character of a monetary interest. *(McGrath*v. *People,*100 Ill. 464; *Hitchcock*v. *Greene,*252 id 519; *State Board of Agriculture*v. *Brady,*266 id. 592.)” Unlike *Public Utilities Com. ex rel. Macon County Telephone Co.*v. *Bethany Mutual Telephone Ass’n,*270 Ill. 183, the present case does not arise under section 69 of the Public Utilities Act which authorizes direct appeals to this court from judgments entered by the circuit or superior court “in review of rules, regulations, orders or decisions of the Commission.” Ill. Rev. Stat. 1961, chap. *111%,*par. 73.

The cause is therefore transferred to the Appellate Court for the First District.

, *Cause transferred.*