alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1814. Transfer or assignment; expiration; renewal

#### (a) Transfer or assignment prohibited

A certificate of registration may not be transferred or assigned.

#### (b) Expiration; renewals

(1) Unless earlier suspended or revoked, a certificate shall expire twelve months from the date of issuance, except that (A) certificates issued under this chapter during the period beginning December 1, 1982, and ending November 30, 1983, may be issued for a period of up to twenty-four months for the purpose of an orderly transition to registration under this chapter, (B) a certificate may be temporarily extended by the filing of an application with the Secretary at least thirty days prior to its expiration date, and (C) the Secretary may renew a certificate for additional twelve-month periods or for periods in excess of twelve months but not in excess of twenty-four months.

(2) Eligibility for renewals for periods of more than twelve months shall be limited to farm labor contractors who have not been cited for a violation of this chapter, or any regulation under this chapter, or the Farm Labor Contractor Registration Act of 1963 [7 U.S.C. 2041 et seq.], or any regulation under such Act, during the preceding five years.

(Pub. L. 97–470, title I, §104, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2589.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Farm Labor Contractor Registration Act of 1963, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is Pub. L. 88–582, Sept. 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 920, which was classified generally to chapter 52 (§2041 et seq.) of Title 7, Agriculture, and was repealed by Pub. L. 97–470, title V, §523, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2600. See section 1801 et seq. of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days from Jan. 14, 1983, see section 524 of Pub. L. 97–470, set out as a note under section 1801 of this title.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-30758

Summary Calendar

ROBAE AUSTIN,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, 

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:14-CV-276

Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robae Austin, Louisiana prisoner # 366497, appeals the district court’s 

denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, challenging his conviction for second 

degree murder. In reviewing the denial of § 2254 relief, this court reviews 

issues of law de novo and findings of fact for clear error, applying the same 

deference to the state court’s decision as the district court under the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-30758 Document: 00514607228 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2018
No. 17-30758

2

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). Ortiz v. 

Quarterman, 504 F.3d 492, 496 (5th Cir. 2007). 

On appeal, Austin asserts that his right to an impartial jury was violated 

because the jury foreperson failed to respond honestly to a voir dire question 

inquiring whether anyone had a friend who had been a victim of a crime. After 

the verdict, Austin discovered that the juror had two friends who had been 

murdered, and Austin filed a motion for new trial raising the issue. At a 

hearing on the motion, Austin requested that the foreperson and another juror 

be allowed to testify. The trial court did not allow the witnesses to testify and 

denied the motion. 

In order to obtain a new trial due to a juror’s alleged failure to completely 

and truthfully answer the questions posed to her during voir dire, the 

defendant must demonstrate that the complained of juror failed to provide an 

honest answer to a material question and that a truthful response would have 

provided a valid basis to challenge the juror for cause. Hatten v. Quarterman, 

570 F.3d 595, 600 (5th Cir. 2009); McDonough Power Equip., Inc. v. Greenwood, 

464 U.S. 548, 556 (1984). The district court determined that the foreperson 

was a fair and impartial juror based on her voir dire responses. Thus, even if 

the foreperson should have been allowed to testify at the hearing as Austin 

asserts, he has failed to satisfy the foregoing standard as he has not shown a 

valid basis to challenge her for cause due to her friendship with two murder 

victims. See, e.g., State v. Mitchell, 7 So. 3d 720, 730-32 (La. Ct. App. 2009); 

State v. Robinson, 11 So. 3d 613, 622 (La. Ct. App. 2009); McDonough, 464 U.S. 

at 556. Austin has not demonstrated that there was no reasonable basis for 

the state court to deny relief on his claims. See Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 

86, 98-99 (2011); § 2254(d). 

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 17-30758 Document: 00514607228 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2018
### §2009. Assignment of rooms to Commissioner from Puerto Rico

In the matter of the assignment of rooms under sections 2004 to 2011 of this title, Delegates in Congress and the Commissioner from Puerto Rico shall be treated the same as Representatives.

(May 28, 1908, No. 30, 35 Stat. 579; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158; Proc. No. 2695, eff. July 4, 1946, 11 F.R. 7517, 60 Stat. 1352.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 182 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

Words "and the Philippine Islands" after "Puerto Rico" were omitted pursuant to 1946 Proc. No. 2695, eff. July 4, 1946, 11 F.R. 7517, 60 Stat. 1352, which granted independence to the Philippine Islands on July 4, 1946, under the authority of act Mar. 24, 1934, ch. 84, §10, 48 Stat. 463, as amended, which is classified to section 1394 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Puerto Rico" substituted in text for "Porto Rico" pursuant to act May 17, 1932, which is classified to section 731a of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

#### Commissioner From Puerto Rico as Resident Commissioner

Section 2106 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, provides that the term "Members of Congress" shall include the "Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico."
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-106 September 16, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled the following upcoming

meetings on Millstone Station:

* On Tuesday, September 22, the NRC staff will meet with officials of Northeast

Utilities to discuss the results of the NRC evaluation of the Millstone Employee

Concerns Program and Safety-Conscious Work Environment.

The meeting, which is open to the public for observation, will begin at 11:00 a.m.

in the Leland F. Sillin Training Center at the Millstone site.

* On Tuesday, October 6, the NRC staff and NU officials will meet to discuss the

results of the NRC’s Independent Corrective Action Verification Program Tier 1

and Tier 2 inspections at Millstone 2.

The meeting begins at 1:00 p.m. in the Millstone Training Center. It is open to

the public for observation.

* Later that evening, the NRC staff will meet with the public to provide an update

on the status of the Millstone Unit 2 recovery efforts and NRC internal

realignment, which dissolved the Special Projects Office for Millstone.

The meeting begins at 7:00 p.m. in the Waterford Town Hall on Rope Ferry

Road.

#
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 20-CV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER GRANTING RECEIVER’S FOURTEENTH APPLICATION FOR 

ALLOWANCE AND PAYMENT OF PROFESSIONALS’ FEES AND 

REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES FOR OCTOBER 1, 2023 – DECEMBER 31, 2023

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Receiver Ryan K. Stumphauzer’s Fourteenth

Application for Allowance and Payment of Professionals’ Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses 

for October 1, 2023 – December 31, 2023 (“Application”), [ECF No. 1809], filed on February 21, 

2024. The Court has reviewed the Application and is otherwise fully advised.

This is a complex receivership involving the operation of a merchant cash advance business

with a receivable balance, as of the date the Receivership was established, of over $400 million, 

and a group of investors that are seeking, collectively, more than $300 million from the company. 

The Receiver and his professional team are managing numerous operational issues involving more 

than 1,300 merchants that are parties to merchant cash advance agreements with Par Funding. The 

Application and records submitted by the Receiver reflect that the Receiver and his professional 

team have reasonably and diligently discharged their duties. 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1811 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2024 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

The Receiver’s tasks in this case have included negotiating with Par Funding’s merchants

in an effort to reach settlements of MCA account balances; employing consultants to oversee and

manage Par Funding; pursuing various claims against non-parties that may generate additional

income to the Receivership Estate; assuming responsibilities over various residential and

commercial properties; responding to issues and document requests related to pending litigation

and investigations involving the Receivership Entities; communicating with the Defendants and

responding to discovery requests; establishing and administering a claims process; and drafting 

status reports for the Court.

In performing these tasks, among others, the Receiver and his professional team have

provided a significant benefit to the Receivership Estate, investors, and creditors at rates that the

Court finds reasonable. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Application, [ECF No. 1809], is GRANTED as

follows:

Professional Fees: $ 752,263.25

Expenses: $ 16,873.42

TOTAL: $ 769,136.67

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 21st day of February, 2024.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1811 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2024 Page 2 of 2
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLangley Mach 4 Scramjet Test FacilityAn engine test facility was constructed at the NASA Langley Research Center in support of a supersonic combustion ramjet (scramjet) technology development program. Hydrogen combustion in air with oxygen replenishment provides simulated air at Mach 4 flight velocity, pressure, and true total temperature for an altitude range from 57,000 to 86,000 feet. A facility nozzle with a 13 in square exit produces a Mach 3.5 free jet flow for engine propulsion tests. The facility is described and calibration results are presented which demonstrate the suitability of the test flow for conducting scramjet engine research.Document ID19850008574Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsEarl H Andrews Jr.*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Marvin G Torrence*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Griffin Y Anderson*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*G Burton Northam*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Ernest A Mackley*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1985Subject CategoryResearch And Support Facilities (Air)Report/Patent NumberL-15827NAS 1.15:86277NASA-TM-86277Accession Number85N16883Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-43-83Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850008574.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §1973. Support and maintenance expenditures during emergency duty

At any time on or after November 12, 2001, the Capitol Police Board may incur obligations and make expenditures out of available appropriations for meals, refreshments and other support and maintenance for the Capitol Police when, in the judgment of the Capitol Police Board, such obligations and expenditures are necessary to respond to emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property.

(Pub. L. 107–68, title I, §124, Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 576.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 206e of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****Annual report, fy...**
 
2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc:ID 1.27:IN 2/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000635270
 
October 31, 2017
### §144. Copies of Statutes at Large

Ten of the copies of the Statutes at Large, published by Little, Brown & Co., which were deposited in the Library prior to February 5, 1859, shall be retained by the Librarian for the use of the justices of the Supreme Court, during the terms of court.

(R.S. §96.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §96 derived from act Feb. 5, 1859, ch. 22, §11, 11 Stat. 381.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-171 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 3
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-171 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of 3
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-171 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 3 of 3
### SUBCHAPTER II—CONGRESSIONAL CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED RESCISSIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND DEFERRALS OF BUDGET AUTHORITY
Exhibit A

Case 1:20-cv-23101-BB Document 23-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:20-cv-23101-BB Document 23-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:20-cv-23101-BB Document 23-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:20-cv-23101-BB Document 23-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:20-cv-23101-BB Document 23-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:20-cv-23101-BB Document 23-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:20-cv-23101-BB Document 23-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:20-cv-23101-BB Document 23-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 8 of 8
### §130–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 130–2 was editorially reclassified as section 5582 of this title.
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Michael B. Wheeler, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 ofTufco Technologies, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006   /s/Michael B. Wheeler Michael B. Wheeler  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,869
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,759,444
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,762,313
<PP&E>                                      93,162,180
<DEPRECIATION>                              44,182,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,742,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,762,313
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,979,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,742,109
<SALES>                                      7,883,492
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,883,492
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  900,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               398,143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (7318)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,591,901
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,591,901
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,591,901
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.113
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.113


</TABLE>
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-87 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 7
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-87 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of 7
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-87 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 3 of 7
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-87 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 4 of 7
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-87 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 5 of 7
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-87 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 6 of 7
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-87 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 7 of 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          30,985
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  131,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,208
<PP&E>                                          73,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,908
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,949,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,720
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,696
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,853,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,949,589
<SALES>                                        133,618
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               208,419
<CGS>                                          154,852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  154,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,259)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,826
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,626
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 68,650
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   106,276
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .107
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .107
        

</TABLE>