alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDynamic and control assessment of the Space Station Freedom payload pointing systemAn analysis of the proposed Space Station Freedom Payload Pointing System (PPS) was performed to assess its dynamic payload pointing capability in the dynamic environment of the Space Station Freedom (SSF). In addition, the stability and control the the SSF was examined to verify the capability of its control devices to accommodate the impact of PPS operations. An analysis of the PPS ability to provide continuous, accurate pointing was performed and compared to the program requirements specified in the 1988 Program Definition and Requirement Document (PDRD). Results indicated that the PPS was not able to perform within the program requirements during the worst case scenario of a shuttle hard docking maneuver to the port side SSF docking adapter. The PPS maintained marginal pointing accuracy during crew treadmill activity. The Space Station attitude control system easily accommodated all PPS operations simulated. The PPS caused a negligible impact on the SSF's control environment.Document ID19910011912Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsShannon, David T., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1991Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:101667NASA-TM-101667Accession Number91N21225Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 476-14-06-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910011912.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
KEITH MATHIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5248

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 1, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Robert Groeb, Judge.

Stephen N. Bernstein, Gainesville, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
Mr.	Davide	Calda

2725	South	Lockwood	Ridge	Rd

Sarasota	34239	Florida

Petition	under	Section	333	of	the	FAA	Modernization	Act	of	2012	(FRMA)	for	

waiver	of	Airworthiness	Certificate

Petitioner	plans	on	operating	an Unmanned	Aircraft,	more	specifically	a	DJI Phantom	3	

Professional,	for	the	following	purposes:

1. To	take	videos	or	photographs	of	homes,	commercial	buildings,	land	or	lots for	sale	to	

be	used	in	marketing said	properties.

2. To	Take	video	for	Documentary,	Wedding,	Corporate.

3. To	Take	video	for	inspection	of	buildings, normally	roof	and	gutters,	for owners.

4. To	inspect	bridges,	roads	and	railroads	for	maintenance	purposes	or	such	purposes	

requested	by	owners	which may	be	government	entities.

5. Aircraft	may	be	used	at	times	by	the	owner	for	recreational	purposes	for	which	the	air	

certificate	is	not	required.

Operation	of	the	unmanned	aircraft	will:

1. Be	by	petitioner,	a	person	over	17	years	in	age who	is	trained	in	the	operation	of	the	

identified	aircraft.	

2. Be	at	altitudes	not	to	exceed	500	feet above	the	ground.

3. Remain	in	visual	line	of	sight	of	the	operator.

4. Be	flown	close	enough	to	the	operator	for	the	operator	to	be	able	to	see	the	aircraft	

with	vision	unaided	by	any	device	other	than	corrective	lenses.

5. Be	flown	only	when	the	visibility	is	3	or	more	miles	from the	operator.	

6. Give	due	consideration	for	the	safety	of	persons	and	property	in	the	area	of	operation

and	the	aircraft	will	not	be	flown	over	persons	not	involved	in	the	operation.

7. Not	be	flown	dangerously	or	recklessly.

8. Be	flown	only	between	sunrise	to	sunset

9. Yield	right-of-way	to	other	aircraft	whether	manned	or	unmanned.

10. Not	be	operated	at	a	speed	over	35	mph,	the	maximum	speed	of	the	aircraft..

11. Be	operated only outside a	5 miles	radius	of	any	airport.
12. Only	be	undertaken	after	a	preflight	inspection	as	set	forth	in	Manufacturer’s Safety	

Guidelines	and	Disclaimer attached.

The	DJI	Phantom	3	Professional	weighs	less	than 3	pounds,	and	has	a	top	speed	of	35	mph.	

It	calculates speed,	altitude	and	GPS	information	which	is	displayed	on	the	operator’s	

consol.	It	also	has	a	“go	home”	capability	which	will	return	it	to	the	GPS	location	the	flight	

started	from	on	command	or	when	battery	voltage	decreases	beyond	a	certain	value.

Manufacturer	certifies	that	the	aircraft	and	its	controls	comply	with	part	15	of	FCC Rules	in	

Safety	Guidelines	and	Disclaimer attached.	

Petitioner	seeks	an	exemption	of	the	Airworthiness	Certificate	under	the	authority	granted	to

the	Secretary by	Section 333.
Exhibit
23.2















CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







The Board
of Directors and Stockholders


Waccamaw
Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiary


Whiteville,
North Carolina








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-107299, 333-126235, and 333-153327) on Form S-8 of Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc.
and Subsidiary (the “Company”) of our report dated March 31, 2009, with respect
to the 2008 consolidated financial statements, which report appears in the
Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our report on the consolidated
financial statements refers to the Company’s adoption of the provisions of
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation
and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements.








Greenville,
North Carolina


April 15,
2010
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-41 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, March 24, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a

meeting April 16 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will

begin at 8:30 a.m. in Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, Md. The Subcommittee on Reliability and Probabilistic

Risk Assessment will continue its review of matters related to

elevation of core damage frequency to a fundamental goal, and

possible revision of the Commission’s Safety Goal Policy

Statement. Some portions of the meeting may be closed.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, will be described in a Notice of Meeting

published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

#
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.231 Applicability.

Title II of Public Law 106-200 (114 Stat. 251), entitled the United States-Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act (CBTPA), amended section 213(b) of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (the CBERA, 19 U.S.C. 2701-2707) to authorize the President to extend additional trade benefits to countries that have been designated as beneficiary countries under the CBERA. Section 213(b)(3) of the CBERA (19 U.S.C. 2703(b)(3)) provides for special preferential tariff treatment of certain non-textile articles that are otherwise excluded from duty-free treatment under the CBERA. The provisions of §§ 10.231-10.237 of this part set forth the legal requirements and procedures that apply for purposes of obtaining preferential tariff treatment pursuant to CBERA section 213(b)(3).

[T.D. 00-68, 65 FR 59663, Oct. 5, 2000; 65 FR 67263, Nov. 9, 2000]
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.2026 Verification and justification of claim for preferential tariff treatment. ( a ) *Verification.* A claim for preferential tariff treatment made under § 10.2003(b) or § 10.2011, including any statements or other information submitted to CBP in support of the claim, will be subject to such verification as the Center director deems necessary. In the event that the Center director is provided with insufficient information to verify or substantiate the claim, or the Center director finds a pattern of conduct, indicating that an importer, exporter, or producer has provided false or unsupported declarations or certifications, or the exporter or producer fails to consent to a verification visit, the Center director may deny the claim for preferential treatment. A verification of a claim for preferential tariff treatment under PANTPA for goods imported into the United States may be conducted by means of one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Written requests for information from the importer, exporter, or producer;
( 2 ) Written questionnaires to the importer, exporter, or producer;
( 3 ) Visits to the premises of the exporter or producer in the territory of Panama, to review the records of the type referred to in § 10.2009(c)(1) or to observe the facilities used in the production of the good, in accordance with the framework that the Parties develop for conducting verifications; and
( 4 ) Such other procedures to which the Parties may agree.
( b ) *Applicable accounting principles.* When conducting a verification of origin to which Generally Accepted Accounting Principles may be relevant, CBP will apply and accept the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles applicable in the country of production.
Exhibit 99.1


                           GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.
                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greg Manning Auctions,
Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2002, I, Greg Manning, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc., hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     1.   this Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies
          with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended
          December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of Greg Manning
          Auctions, Inc.


Dated:  February 6, 2003

                                          /s/ Greg Manning
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Greg Manning, President and Chief
                                          Executive Officer
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-071 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, May 9, 1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a

meeting June 3 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will begin at 8:30

a.m. in Room 2B3 of the NRC's Two White Flint North building at

11545 Rockville Pike. The Subcommittee on Human Factors will

discuss the draft of the NRC Human Performance Program Plan and

related matters. Some portions of the meeting may be closed to

the public to discuss organizational and personnel matters.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, are described in a Notice of Meeting published in

the May 9 edition of the Federal Register.

#
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****Annual report**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc:ID 1.27:B 22/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000635138
 
October 31, 2017
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-149 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Tuesday, October 7,

1997)

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET OCTOBER 21-23 IN POTOMAC AND ROCKVILLE, MD

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on

Nuclear Waste (ACNW) will hold its 95th technical meeting

October 21-23 in Potomac and Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will begin at 8:30

a.m. each day. The October 21 session will be held at the

William F. Bolger Center For Leadership Development, 9600

Newbridge Drive, Potomac. The October 22 and 23 sessions will be

held in Room T-2B3, One White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike,

Rockville.

Although meetings of the ACNW are open, they are not part of

the NRC's public hearing process. The ACNW was established in

1988 to advise the Commission on all aspects of nuclear waste

management. While anyone may attend the meeting, the committee

will consider only oral or written statements that are arranged

in advance and limited to specific matters set forth in a Notice

of Meeting to be published in an upcoming issue of the Federal

Register.

During the retreat October 21, ACNW members will discuss

their mission, planned accomplishments, priorities, and work

processes for fiscal years 1998-1999. At the October 22 and 23

sessions, the committee will meet with the NRC’s Director of

Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and

Safeguards (NMSS), to discuss technical assistance developments

at the Yucca Mountain project. It also will review research

being conducted on nuclear waste disposal by NRC staff; prepare

for its forthcoming meeting with the Commission; and discuss

proposed reports, topics for future consideration and

miscellaneous matters.

Further information regarding topics to be discussed,

whether the meeting has been canceled or rescheduled, the

Chairman’s ruling on requests for an opportunity to present oral
statements and the time allotted for them can be obtained by

contacting Richard K. Major, Chief, Nuclear Waste Branch at (301)

415-7366. ACNW also maintains an Internet site on the NRC

Homepage (http//www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW).

#

(NOTE TO EDITORS: The use of self-contained tape recorders

in the meeting room is permitted during open portions of the

meeting when a transcript is being kept. The use of still,

motion picture and television cameras - the physical installation

and presence of which will not interfere with the course of the

meeting - will be permitted both before and after the meeting,

during any recess, and, at the discretion of the committee

chairman, while the meeting is in session.)

##
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.344 Unique requirements of the EWCP. ( a ) An applicant must submit cash flow projections to support the need for the loan and the ability to repay. After the loan is made, the loan recipient must submit continual progress reports.
( b ) SBA does not limit the amount of extraordinary servicing fees, as referenced in § 120.221(b), under the EWCP.
( c ) SBA does not prescribe the interest rates for the EWCP, but will monitor these rates for reasonableness.
[61 FR 3235, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 85 FR 7648, Feb. 10, 2020; 85 FR 80588, Dec. 14, 2020]
[LOGO]
                                    NuTech
                                     Digital, Inc

                                  June 18, 2004

Mr. Joseph Giarmo
c/o NuTech Digital, Inc.
7900 Gloria Avneue
Van Nuys, California 91406

Dear Joe:

      The Board of Directors of NuTech Digital, Inc. (the "Company") has
approved a grant to you of an incentive stock option covering 300,000 shares of
restricted common stock as a performance incentive. The market value of the
Company's common stock today is $0.35. These options are intended to be
incentive options in accordance with section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code.
The term of the option will be ten years, to April 14, 2014, after which time it
will not be exercisable. The Company will seek shareholder approval of the
option at its next annual meeting of shareholders. The Company will register the
option on an S-8 Registration Statement. You may not transfer this option other
than by Will or the laws of descent and distribution. During your lifetime, this
option will be exercisable only by you. The option will be exercisable by you
immediately as to 150,000 shares, in recognition of your work on the concert
given by Russell Jones and, as to the remaining 150,000 shares, when and if the
Company meets the following milestones:

      (1) Your right to purchase 50,000 shares will vest if the Company earns
$2,000,000 in revenues during any calendar quarter of the 2004 fiscal year;

      (2) Your right to purchase 50,000 shares will vest if the Company earns at
least $5,000,000 in revenues during the 2004 fiscal year; and

      (3) Your right to purchase 50,000 shares will be issued to you upon the
successful production by the Company of no less than two major music concerts
during the 2004 fiscal year. A major music concert for this purpose shall be
defined as a concert whose production budget is no less than $250,000.

      The Board of Directors is confident in your ability to successfully meet
these performance objectives. If you agree to this proposal, please countersign
this letter at the space indicated below.


<PAGE>

Mr. Joseph Giarmo
June 18, 2004
Page 2

                                       Very truly yours,

                                       NuTECH DIGITAL, INC.

                                       By: /s/ Lee Kasper
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Lee Kasper, President

June 18, 2004

         I have read the above letter and agree to its terms.


                                       /s/ Joseph Giarmo
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Joseph Giarmo
### §121c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 121c was editorially reclassified as section 6635 of this title.
#### Walter L. Rothschild v. Jerome Park Realty Corp.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for reargument denied, with $10 costs-. Present — -Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 272 App. Div. 1044.]
#### Wonderland Amusement Company, Appellant, v. Frederick F. Proctor, Jr., Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### §114. Separability

If any provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the remaining provisions of this chapter and the application of such provisions to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Mar. 23, 1932, ch. 90, §14, 47 Stat. 73.)
### §§111, 112. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section 111, act Mar. 23, 1932, ch. 90, §11, 47 Stat. 72, related to contempts, speedy and public trial, and jury. See section 3692 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

Section 112, act Mar. 23, 1932, ch. 90, §12, 47 Stat. 73, related to contempts and demand for retirement of sitting judge. See rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, set out in the Appendix to Title 18.
----

----

I Informacje

Komisja

----

Kursy walutowe euro (1)

30 stycznia 2006

(2006/C 23/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Źródło: referencyjny kurs wymiany walut opublikowany przez ECB.

----

----

Informacje przekazane przez Państwa Członkowskie, dotyczące pomocy państwa przyznanej na mocy rozporządzenia Komisji (WE) nr 70/2001 z dnia 12 stycznia 2001 r. w sprawie zastosowania art. 87 i 88 Traktatu WE w odniesieniu do pomocy państwa dla małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw

(2006/C 23/02)

(Tekst o znaczeniu dla EOG)

----

----

Uprzednie zgłoszenie koncentracji

(Sprawa nr COMP/M.4108 — T-Systems/Gedas)

(2006/C 23/03)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

----

(1)Dz.U. L 24 z 29.1.2004, str. 1.

----

----

Uprzednie zgłoszenie koncentracji

(Sprawa nr COMP/M.4111 — Goldman Sachs/Daiwa/SMBC/Sanyo)

Sprawa kwalifikująca się do rozpatrzenia w ramach procedury uproszczonej

(2006/C 23/04)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

----

(1)Dz.U. L 24 z 29.1.2004, str. 1.

(2)Dz.U. C 56 z 5.3.2005, str. 32

----
### §1397. Application of part in case of certain pre-1980 withdrawals; adjustment of covered plan

(a) For the purpose of determining the amount of unfunded vested benefits allocable to an employer for a partial or complete withdrawal from a plan which occurs after September 25, 1980, and for the purpose of determining whether there has been a partial withdrawal after such date, the amount of contributions, and the number of contribution base units, of such employer properly allocable—

(1) to work performed under a collective bargaining agreement for which there was a permanent cessation of the obligation to contribute before September 26, 1980, or

(2) to work performed at a facility at which all covered operations permanently ceased before September 26, 1980, or for which there was a permanent cessation of the obligation to contribute before that date,

shall not be taken into account.

(b) A plan may, in a manner not inconsistent with regulations, which shall be prescribed by the corporation, adjust the amount of unfunded vested benefits allocable to other employers under a plan maintained by an employer described in subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 93–406, title IV, §4217, as added Pub. L. 96–364, title I, §104(2), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1235; amended Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title V, §558(b)(1)(A), (B), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 899.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–369, §558(b)(1)(A), (B), substituted "September 25, 1980" for "April 28, 1980" in provisions preceding par. (1) and "September 26, 1980" for "April 29, 1980" in pars. (1) and (2).
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. (Historicalpurposes)
**Title: Annualreport, fy...**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc:ID 1.27:IN 2/2/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000635267
 
October 31, 2017