alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Martha L. HARDWICK, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent.

No. 02-3125.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 1, 2002.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
### §112f. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 112f was editorially reclassified as section 5509 of this title.
#### § 6302.11 How may I use wilderness areas?

Unless otherwise provided by BLM, the Wilderness Act, or the Act of Congress designating the area as wilderness, all wilderness areas will be open to uses consistent with the preservation of their wilderness character and their future use and enjoyment as wilderness. In subpart 6304 you will find provisions implementing the special provisions of the Wilderness Act that allow specific uses of wilderness areas. In § 6302.20 you will find a list of acts that are explicitly prohibited within wilderness areas.
STATE OF MAINE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

JOHN ELIAS BALDACCI DAVID P LITTELL 

GOVERNOR 

September 11, 2009 

David Conroy, Chief 

Air Programs Branch 

U.S . EPA Region I 

1 Congress St., Suite 1100 

Boston, Ma. 02114-2023 

Enclosed please find for your approval and inclusion into Maine's State Implementation 

Plan (SIP), Chapter 131, Cutback Asphalt and Emulsified Asphalt. 

A public hearing was held on June 18, 2009 in accordance with federal and state 

administrative requirements . Public notice of the hearing was published in the Kennebec 

Journal on May 16, 2009 and in newspapers statewide on May 27, 2009. On August 20, 

2009, the Board of Environmental Protection adopted Chapter 131 . 

The following administrative materials are enclosed : 

1 . Memorandum to the Board of Environmental Protection requesting a public hearing 

dated April 16, 2009; 

2 . Copy of the public notice that appeared in the Kennebec Journal on May 16, 2009; 

3 . Memorandum to the Board of Environmental Protection requesting adoption of the 

rule, dated August 20, 2009; 

4. Chapter 131 Cutback Asphalt and Emulsified Asphalt as adopted by the Board of 

Environmental Protection on August 20, 2009 with an effective date of September 15, 

2009 ; 

COMMISSIONER 

AUGUSTA 

17 STATE HOUSE STATION BANGOR PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE 

AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0017 106 HOGAN ROAD 312 CANCO ROAD 1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK 

(207) 287-7688 FAX: (207) 287-7826 BANGOR, MAINE 04401 PORTLAND, MAINE 04103 PRESQUE ISLE, MAINE 04769-2094 

RAY BLDG., HOSPITAL ST . (207) 941-4570 FAX: (207) 941-4584 (207) 822-6300 FAX: (207) 822-6303 (207) 764-0477 FAX: (207) 760-3143 

we6 ene: HHw.maine .Rov d, p printed on recvcled paper 
5 . Summary of comments and the Department's response; 

6 . MAPA I form for Chapter 131 which provides certification by the Commissioner that 

the hearing was held on June 18, 2009, the Board of Environmental Protection 

lawfully adopted this rule on August 20, 2009 and certification that the Attorney 

General approved the rule as to form and legality ; and 

7. The June 18, 2009 public hearing transcript . 

Should you have any questions, please contact Carolyn Wheeler at (207) 287-2437 . 

Sincerely, 

ames P. Brooks 

Director 

Bureau of Air Quality 

Enclosures 

cc: Anne Arnold 

Carolyn Wheeler w/o encl 

SIP file
### §219a. Severability

If any provision of this subchapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this subchapter and this chapter and of the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Aug. 29, 1935, ch. 814, title II, §209, as added Pub. L. 100–690, title VIII, §8001(a)(3), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4521.)
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.218 Judges. ( a ) *Assignment.* The AA/OHA will assign all cases subject to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551 *et seq.,* to an Administrative Law Judge. The AA/OHA will assign all other cases before OHA to either an Administrative Law Judge or an Administrative Judge, or, if the AA/OHA is a duly licensed attorney, to himself or herself.
( b ) *Authority.* Except as otherwise limited by this part, or by statute or other regulation, a Judge has the authority to take all appropriate action to ensure the efficient, prompt, and fair determination of a case, including, but not limited to, the authority to administer oaths and affirmations and to subpoena and examine witnesses.
( c ) *Recusal.* Upon the motion of a party, or upon the Judge's own initiative, a Judge will promptly recuse himself or herself from further participation in a case whenever disqualification is appropriate due to conflict of interest, bias, or some other significant reason. A denial of a motion for recusal may be appealed within 5 days to the AA/OHA, or to the Administrative Law Judge if the AA/OHA is the Judge, but that appeal will not stay proceedings in the case.
[61 FR 2683, Jan. 29, 1996, as amended at 75 FR 47441, Aug. 6, 2010]
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/02/2010 10:35 PM
-----
|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
  |"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>                                                                                            
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA                                                                                                               
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Cc:        |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
  |RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA                                                                                                            
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
  |08/02/2010 03:51 PM                                                                                                                         
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Additional Interagency Comments on RICE Rule                                                                                                
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|





Hi Melanie,
Attached are additional interagency comments on the RICE rule.  Please let me 
know if you have any questions and whether we need a call to discuss these 
comments.


Furthermore, could you send over the following materials:
      -          Emissions Factors Data and Information
      -          Guidance on Excluded Facilities from Inventory


Regards,
Cortney

 (See attached file:
InteragencyWorkingCommentsonEPA_RICE_SI_EO12866Review_08022010.pdf)
### §3004. Service of process; enforcement; notice

(a) Manner of Service.—A complaint, notice, writ, or other process required to be served in an action or proceeding under this chapter shall be served in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure unless otherwise provided in this chapter.

(b) Nationwide Enforcement.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2)—

(A) any writ, order, judgment, or other process, including a summons and complaint, filed under this chapter may be served in any State; and

(B) such writ, order, or judgment may be enforced by the court issuing the writ, order, or process, regardless of where the person is served with the writ, order, or process.

(2) If the debtor so requests, within 20 days after receiving the notice described in section 3101(d) or 3202(b), the action or proceeding in which the writ, order, or judgment was issued shall be transferred to the district court for the district in which the debtor resides.

(c) Notice and Other Process.—At such time as counsel for the United States considers appropriate, but not later than the time a prejudgment or postjudgment remedy is put into effect under this chapter, counsel for the United States shall exercise reasonable diligence to serve on the debtor and any person who the United States believes, after exercising due diligence, has possession, custody, or control of the property, a copy of the application for such remedy, the order granting such remedy, and the notice required by section 3101(d) or 3202(b).

(Added Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVI, §3611, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4936.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (a), are set out in the Appendix to this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Nov. 29, 1990, and applicable with respect to certain actions for debts owed the United States pending in court on that effective date, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101–647, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING THE RECEIVER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO LIFT 

LITIGATION INJUNCTION TO PERMIT THE RECEIVER TO VOLUNTARILY 

RELEASE PAR FUNDING’S SUBORDINATE SECURITY INTEREST ALLOWING

FOR SALE OF 12405 EAST BRANDT ROAD, LOCKEFORD, CALIFORNIA

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Receiver’s Unopposed Motion to Lift 

Litigation Injunction to Permit the Receiver to Voluntarily Release Par Funding’s Subordinate 

Security Interest Allowing for the Sale of 12405 East Brandt Road, Lockeford, California [ECF 

No. 321] (“Motion”), filed on October 14, 2020. In the Motion, the Receiver seeks to modify the 

Court’s Amended Order Appointing Receiver dated August 13, 2020 [ECF No. 141], so as to lift 

the litigation injunction provided for in that Order to permit the Receiver, in his discretion, to take 

steps necessary to voluntarily release Par Funding’s subordinate security interest allowing for the 

sale of 12405 East Brandt Road, Lockeford, California. 

The Receiver has made a sufficient and proper showing in support of the relief requested. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Receiver’s Unopposed Motion to Lift Litigation 

Injunction to Permit the Receiver to Voluntarily Release Par Funding’s Subordinate Security 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 327 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/15/2020 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Interest Allowing for the Sale of 12405 East Brandt Road, Lockeford, California [ECF No. 321] 

is GRANTED as follows:

1. The litigation injunction set forth in the Court’s Amended Order Appointing 

Receiver dated August 13, 2020 [ECF No. 141] is hereby lifted to authorize the Receiver, in his 

discretion, to take steps necessary to voluntarily release Par Funding’s subordinate security interest 

allowing for the sale of 12405 East Brandt Road, Lockeford, California.

2. On the close of escrow, the net proceeds of sale remaining after liens, 

encumbrances, and cost of sale, as authorized above, have been paid, shall be placed into an interest 

bearing segregated account to be held jointly in the names of Ryan K. Stumphauzer, as Receiver 

and The Dennis Wood ROBS 401(k) retirement plan, at an authorized facility. The net proceeds 

may be released only on further order of this Court or by a mutual written agreement, signed by 

Ryan K. Stumphauzer, as Receiver and Dennis Wood as the administrator of the Dennis Wood 

ROBS 401(k) retirement plan.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 15th day of October, 2020.

_________________________________

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: Counsel of record

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 327 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/15/2020 Page 2 of 2
```

[110th Congress Public Law 220]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ220.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 733]]

Public Law 110-220
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 10799 West Alameda Avenue in Lakewood, Colorado, as the ``Felix Sparks 
      Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: May 7, 2008 -  [H.R. 4240]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FELIX SPARKS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 10799 West Alameda Avenue in Lakewood, Colorado, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Felix Sparks Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Felix 
Sparks Post Office Building''.

    Approved May 7, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4240 (S. 2673):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Jan. 28, considered and passed House.
            Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Order filed June 30, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00840-CR

____________

MICHAEL JEROME CLARK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 177th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1366492

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 

34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's exhibit # 20.

The clerk of the 177th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court the 

original of State's exhibit # 20, on or before July 7, 2016. The Clerk of this court is directed to 

receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for 

their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State's exhibit # 

20, to the clerk of the 177th District Court.

PER CURIAM
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.761 Scope.

This subpart implements the duty preference and related customs provisions applicable to imported goods under the United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement (the MFTA) signed on June 15, 2004, and under the United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (the Act; 118 Stat. 1103). Except as otherwise specified in this subpart, the procedures and other requirements set forth in this subpart are in addition to the customs procedures and requirements of general application contained elsewhere in this chapter. Additional provisions implementing certain aspects of the MFTA and the Act are contained in Parts 102, 162, and 163 of this chapter.

[CBP Dec. 07-51, 72 FR 35651, June 29, 2007, as amended at CBP Dec. 08-29, 73 FR 45354, Aug. 5, 2008]
### §2008. Record of assignment of rooms

The Architect of the Capitol shall keep a record of the assignment of rooms made, exchanges which may be made, requests for vacant rooms which may be filed, and the assignment thereof, which record shall be open for the inspection of Representatives or Representatives-elect of the House.

(May 28, 1908, No. 30, 35 Stat. 579; Mar. 3, 1921, ch. 124, 41 Stat. 1291.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 181 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Change of name of Architect of the Capitol, functions abolished, transferred, etc., by prior acts, see Prior Provisions and Change of Name notes set out under former section 1801 of this title.
DATE:

RECORD OF EX PARTE CONTACT

AD DOCKET NUMBER: 2cZ6 - IViW - Z /Z -A [)

FAA EMPLOYEE CONTACTED (name, routing symbol): / ~jj '!Jz Cfy'1./XlP}

ANM- //0

DATEANDTIMEOFCONTACT: / 77?v.scJC!j ,JeW"'- ~, Z.DIO

TYPE OF CONTACT (phone call, formal or informal meeting, etc.): ..L!::%r?Cb /

NAMES OF A~LI'ERSON~~VOLYEDIN CO~T'IINCLUD1~G TITLES AND AFFILlc\T10N:

ant/ h11C),conp I II'c<nf> S!c<I"'J ,4'I')""G'5

--Y;;;;kl ?hc»t;J.5a ()/ rAA ( lI-iV.M- / j b

TOPIC(S) DISCUSSED (Be specific):

1

;(!""iltP5! -A-/' du/,4oc-h'ov d ciri'i-1,v;"IPtIl- <5t{bm' Ikd Jet

1Ja.1/'r,/ hi'1CJ:ar11jJF t:'cmm"v,i \\ dCih-f,a,/;) c. d <-lite re-/p'1.!-rcn...

rPjtt'frf2fr1HrIs 41'e//te 7~'5 /r/Y'e/~e,~;;//

COMMITMENTS MADE BY FAA/DOT PERSONNEL:

,

772?M7is .-,? .J!<eye~/2fe / / -/4,u-k.. ~ Om -I:z1A!.J al:nd- </./''''-

~Czn7C! ell;!'Y/ I Ac~ /'dL5S,'x!jt"'tl ': 1'<"3,P''''<X:: ",,~.-/;y.- {JIif An .

w"f"r < ff WI? INwe nw,i -10- -,e;;¥",r- e,{,/.I'&<";o'l 1'tU,/;/ /e-l-)"h'(

1"'J1,<z-U F

Were any documents discussed? ( ) YES (attach copies or reference) (0'No

PREPARED~2~

---;72'''Y 77"')'7'51"1.)

THIS FORM IS TO BE PLACED IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET

FOR THE SUBJECT RULEMAKING ACTION.
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.6 Shooks and staves; claim for duty exemption.

An importer, seeking an exemption from duty on account of boxes or barrels made from American shooks or staves, must make such a claim on Customs Form 4455, or its electronic equivalent, at the time of filing the entry. Upon receipt, from the director of the port of exportation of the shooks and staves, of corroboration that the records of exportation do not conflict materially with such a claim, the exemption may be allowed. If the claim for an exemption is disallowed in full or in part, the importer may file a request within 15 days of the date of the port director's notice to him of any disallowance, for referral of the question to the Commissioner of Customs for review.

[T.D. 87-75, 52 FR 20066, May 29, 1987, as amended by T.D. 98-52, 63 FR 29954, June 2, 1998; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61284, Oct. 13, 2015]
#### Parkwest Realty Corp., Appellant, v. James R. Kenny, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division, denied, with $10 costs. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.133 Conditions required to be met. When the tariff classification of any article is controlled by its actual use in the United States, three conditions must be met in order to qualify for free entry or a lower rate of duty unless the language of the particular subheading of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States applicable to the merchandise specifies other conditions. The conditions are that: ( a ) Such use is intended at the time of importation.
( b ) The article is so used.
( c ) Proof of use is furnished within 3 years after the date the article is entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption.
[T.D. 71-139, 36 FR 10726, June 2, 1971, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51252, Dec. 21, 1988]
### §122. South Dakota

South Dakota constitutes one judicial district comprising four divisions.

(1) The Northern Division comprises the counties of Brown, Campbell, Clark, Codington, Corson, Day, Deuel, Edmonds, Grant, Hamlin, McPherson, Marshall, Roberts, Spink, and Walworth.

Court for the Northern Division shall be held at Aberdeen.

(2) The Southern Division comprises the counties of Aurora, Beadle, Bon Homme, Brookings, Brule, Charles Mix, Clay, Davison, Douglas, Hanson, Hutchinson, Kingsbury, Lake, Lincoln, McCook, Miner, Minnehaha, Moody, Sanborn, Turner, Union, and Yankton.

Court for the Southern Division shall be held at Sioux Falls.

(3) The central division comprises the counties of Buffalo, Dewey, Faulk, Gregory, Haakon, Hand, Hughes, Hyde, Jerauld, Jones, Lyman, Mellette, Potter, Stanley, Sully, Todd, Tripp, and Ziebach.

Court for the Central Division shall be held at Pierre.

(4) The Western Division comprises the counties of Bennett, Butte, Custer, Fall River, Harding, Jackson, Lawrence, Meade, Pennington, Perkins, and Shannon.

Court for the Western Division shall be held at Deadwood and Rapid City.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 889; Pub. L. 89–638, Oct. 10, 1966, 80 Stat. 883; Pub. L. 92–376, Aug. 10, 1972, 86 Stat. 529; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §324(b), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5120.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §187 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §106, 36 Stat. 1123; June 11, 1932, ch. 242, 47 Stat. 300).

A provision relating to maintenance of offices by the clerk was omitted as covered by sections 452 and 751 of this title.

Provisions that the Northern Division included Lake Traverse Indian Reservation and that part of Standing Rock Indian Reservation lying in South Dakota; that the Southern Division included the Yorkton Indian Reservation; that the Central Division included the Cheyenne River, Lower Brule, and Crow Creek Indian Reservations; and that the Western Division included Rosebud and Pine Ridge Indian Reservations, were all omitted as surplusage. (See Reviser's Note under section 114 of this title.)

Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Par. (3). Pub. L. 101–650, §324(b)(1), struck out "Jackson," after "Hyde,".

Par. (4). Pub. L. 101–650, §324(b)(2), inserted "Jackson," after "Harding," and substituted "and Shannon" for "Shannon, Washabaugh, and Washington".

1972—Par. (2). Pub. L. 92–376, §1(a), removed Gregory County from the Southern Division.

Par. (3). Pub. L. 92–376, §1(b), added Gregory, Mellette, Todd, and Tripp counties to the Central Division and removed Armstrong county from the Central Division.

Par. (4). Pub. L. 92–376, §1(c), removed Mellette, Todd, and Tripp counties from the Western Division.

1966—Pub. L. 89–638 provided for holding court at Rapid City.
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

ESTATE OF KATHL EEN B URKE, DECEASED. § § § § § § No. 08-10-00209- CV

Appea l from the Probate Court No. 1 of B exar County , Texas (TC# 2008-PC-1547)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION Pending befor e the Court is Appellant’s motion for voluntary dismiss al of this a ppeal. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 42.1(a) (1). The motion is g rante d, and this appea l is dismiss ed. Costs of appea l are assessed a g ainst Appellant. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 42.1(d).

GUADA L UPE RI VERA, J ustice Aug ust 31, 2011 Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ
.
### §117. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 117 was editorially reclassified as section 6516 of this title.