alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UTAH

=~ €6LORADO

vf fcPhee Reservoir |
ANASAZL Tetra

HERITAGE CENTER 27
el datnd J.*5)

|Hovenweep}
National
Monument

~e St,

<a

iter)

pe

ee
—*

iN [=== Ute Mountain Ute Reservation Ute Mountain Ute
6 [1 Private Lands North Reservation

Sa
#### Henry Blankfort, Respondent, v. Benjamin Fechter, Appellant.

Order reversed and motion granted upon condition that defendant within ten days pay a trial fee and give an undertaking in the sum of $3,000 to pay any judgment that may be obtained; the cause to be restored to the short cause calendar. Ho opinion. Order to be settled on notice. Present— Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Sanitized

ECOSAR Version 1.11 Results Page

SMILES : [ ]

CHEM : [ ]

CAS Num: [ ]

ChemID1:

MOL FOR: [ ]

MOL WT : [ ]

Log Kow: 3.292 ( EPISuite Kowwin v1.68 Estimate)

Log Kow: (User Entered)

Log Kow: (PhysProp DB exp value

- for comparison only)

Melt Pt: (User Entered for Wat Sol estimate)

Melt Pt: (deg C, PhysProp DB exp value for Wat Sol estim ate)

Wat Sol: 67.73 (mg/L, EPISuite WSKowwin v1.43 Estimate)

Wat Sol: (User Entered)

Wat Sol: (PhysProp DB exp value)

--------------------------------------

Values used to Generate ECOSAR Profile

--------------------------------- -----

Log Kow: 3.292 (EPISuite Kowwin v1.68 Estimate)

Wat Sol: 67.73 (mg/L, EPISuite WSKowwin v1.43 Estimate)

------------------------------------------------

Available Measured Data from ECOSAR Training Set

-------------------------------------- ----------

No Data Available

--------------------------------------

ECOSAR v1.1 Class

- specific Estimations

--------------------------------------

Neutral Organics

Predicted

ECOSAR Class Organism Duration End Pt mg/L (ppm)

================= ============= ============= =========== ==========

Neutral Organics : Fish 96

- hr LC50 11.362

Neutral Organics : Dap hnid 48

- hr LC50 7.268

Neutral Organics : Green Alga e 96

- hr EC50 8.865

Neutral Organics : Fish ChV 1.278

Neutral Organics : Daphnid ChV 0.988

Neutral Organics : Green Algae ChV 3.028

Neutral Organics : Fish (SW) 96

- hr LC50 14.415Neutral Organics : Mysid 96

- hr LC50 4.466

Neutral Organics : Fish (SW) ChV 3.443

Neutral Organics : Mysid (SW) ChV 0.263

Neutral Organics : Earthworm 14

- day LC50 255.278 *

Note: * = asteri sk designates: Chemical may not be soluble enough to measure this predicted effect. If

the effect level exceeds the water solubility by 10X, typically no effects at saturation (NES) are

reported.

------------------------------

Class Specific Log Kow Cut

- Offs

------------------------------

If the log Kow of the chemical is greater than the endpoint specific cut

- offs presented below, then no

effects at saturation are expected for those endpoints.

Neutral Organics:

----------------

Maximum LogKow: 5.0 (Fis h 96

- hr LC50; Daphnid LC50, Mysid LC50)

Maximum LogKow: 6.0 (Earthworm LC50)

Maximum LogKow: 6.4 (Green Algae EC50)

Maximum LogKow: 8.0 (ChV)
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.523 What is the “earliest uncured payment default”?

The earliest uncured payment default is the date of the earliest failure by a Borrower to pay a regular installment of principal and/or interest when due. Payments made by the Borrower before a Lender makes its request to SBA to purchase are applied to the earliest uncured payment default. If the installment is paid in full, the earliest uncured payment default date will advance to the next unpaid installment date. If a Borrower makes any payment after the Lender makes its request to SBA to purchase, the earliest uncured payment default date does not change because the Lender has already exercised its right to request purchase.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of TEXAS EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY (Company), a
Delaware corporation, acting in its capacity as general partner of TE Products
Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership, does hereby constitute and appoint
WILLIAM L. THACKER, CHARLES H. LEONARD AND JAMES C. RUTH, and each of them, his
true and lawful attorney and agent to do any and all acts and things, and 
execute any and all instruments which, with the advise and consent of Counsel,
said attorney and agent may deem necessary or advisable to enable the Company to
comply with the Securities Act of 1934, as Amended, and any rules regulations,
and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including
specifically, but without limitation thereof, to sign his name as a director
and/or officer of the Company to the Form 10-K Report for TE Prodcuts Pipeline
Company, Limited Parternship for the year ended December 31, 1998, and to any
instrument or document filed as a part of, or in accordance with, said Form 10-K
or Amendment thereto; and the undersigned to hereby ratify and confirm all that
said attorney and agent shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have subscribed these presents this
25th day of March, 1999.


/s/ William L. Thacker                 /s/ Fred J. Fowler
-----------------------------------    ------------------------------------
William L. Thacker                     Fred J. Fowler



/s/ Ruth G. Shaw                       /s/ Jim W. Mogg
-----------------------------------    ------------------------------------
Ruth G. Shaw                           Jim W. Mogg



/s/ Richard J. Osborne                 /s/ Derrill Cody
-----------------------------------    ------------------------------------
Richard J. Osborne                     Derrill Cody



/s/ Milton Carroll                     /s/ Carl D. Clay
-----------------------------------    ------------------------------------
Milton Carroll                         Carl D. Clay



/s/ John P. DesBarres                  /s/ Charles H. Leonard
-----------------------------------    ------------------------------------
John P. Desbarres                      Charles H. Leonard
                                       Senior Vice President,
                                       CFO & Treasurer
No. 89-6506.

#### Whitaker *v.*Superior Court of California, County of Alameda (Pascarella, Real Party in Interest).

Ct. App. Cal, 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 99-33 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson September 13, 1999

OFFICE: 817-860-8128

JEFFREY CLARK ASSIGNED AS NRC

SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT COOPER

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has assigned Jeffrey Clark to be Senior Resident Inspector at

the Cooper Nuclear Station near Brownville, Nebraska. Mr. Clark assumed his post on September 12.

Mr. Clark is a graduate of Thomas Edison State College in Trenton, New Jersey, where he earned a

bachelor of science degree in Nuclear Engineering Technology. He also earned a bachelor of science degree in

Technology & Management from the University of Maryland, and a master’s degree in Environmental

Engineering from Johns Hopkins University.

Mr. Clark served in the U.S. Navy submarine service for nine years, and held supervisory and project

management positions with a commercial utility company for fourteen years before joining the NRC. At NRC,

Mr. Clark was the resident inspector at Perry, a nuclear power plant near Cleveland, Ohio, for two and one-half

years prior to being assigned to Cooper.

Mr. Clark will reside in Nebraska City with his wife Beth and two children.

###
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby Forrester SPOONE, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6365.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Bobby Forrester Spoone, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, SC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Bobby Forrester Spoone, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Spoone,*Nos. CR-98-178; CA-00-3378-6-13BG (D.S.C. Jan. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and *368legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-98-36 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)

NRC STAFF SCHEDULES MANAGEMENT MEETINGS AT OCONEE

Meetings Open To Observation By Public and Press

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled two management meetings

with Duke Energy officials at the Oconee nuclear power plant on Friday, May 15 to

discuss issues of mutual regulatory concern. The meetings are open to observation by

the public and the press.

Both meetings will be held at the plant site in the Oconee Office Building (Building

8007) in Room 316. The first, from 8:30 a.m. until 11:30 a.m., will be held to discuss

issues related to an NRC Management Oversight Group and recommendations as to its

actions in monitoring performance improvements at Oconee. The second, from 12:30

p.m. until 2:30 p.m., will be held to provide NRC management with an update by plant

officials on the Oconee Recovery Plan which is being implemented to improve the

reliability of plant systems and equipment.

NRC representatives will be available at the conclusion of each meeting to answer

questions from interested observers.

#
David W eaver

2920 Piccadilly Circus St. Pearland, TX 77581 704 - 654 - 0364
### §§797 to 797b. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, §411, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1241

Section 797, Pub. L. 93–112, title VIII, §801, as added Pub. L. 102–569, title VIII, §801(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4469, authorized appropriations.

Section 797a, Pub. L. 93–112, title VIII, §802, as added Pub. L. 102–569, title VIII, §801(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4469, authorized grants for various demonstration projects.

Section 797b, Pub. L. 93–112, title VIII, §803, as added Pub. L. 102–569, title VIII, §801(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4478, authorized grants for training projects.
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.1110 New evidence.

Except for good cause shown, evidence beyond the case file will not be admitted.
EXHIBIT 32.1: CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
   1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      In connection with the accompanying Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Magna-Lab, Inc. for the quarter ended May 31, 2007, the undersigned hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

      (1)   such Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31,
            2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
            of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in such Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
            for the quarter ended May 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
            Magna-Lab, Inc.


July 12, 2007                     /s/ Lawrence A. Minkoff
                                  -----------------------
                                  Name: Lawrence A. Minkoff
                                  Title: President (principal executive officer)
AGENDA

TFI meeting with EPA to discuss RTR for Phosphoric Acid and Phosphate Fertilizer 

NESHAPs

September 11, 2014

1:00pm Introductions

1:10pm Hydrogen Fluoride Testing Results, retaining Total Fluoride as the surrogate

1:30pm Addressing Startup and Shutdown 

1:50pm Work Practice Standards for Phosphogypsum Stacks and Ponds 

2:10pm Schedule for Rule Completion 

2:20pm Other Business 

2:35pm Next Steps
Attendees:

Last First Company

Grussing Jeff Agrium

Burton Scott Hunton & Williams

Foster Wade TFI

O'Hare Andy TFI

Leason Chris

Gallagher & 

Kennedy 

Reesman Chelly Simplot

Jellerson David Mosaic

Smith Ross PCS

George Judith PCS

Taylor Randy URS

Wehlan Chuck Jones Day

Koogler John Koogler & Assoc
§ 19.430 Financial assistance. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, in providing financial assistance to any of its students, a recipient shall not: ( 1 ) On the basis of sex, provide different amounts or types of such assistance, limit eligibility for such assistance that is of any particular type or source, apply different criteria, or otherwise discriminate;
( 2 ) Through solicitation, listing, approval, provision of facilities, or other services, assist any foundation, trust, agency, organization, or person that provides assistance to any of such recipient's students in a manner that discriminates on the basis of sex; or
( 3 ) Apply any rule or assist in application of any rule concerning eligibility for such assistance that treats persons of one sex differently from persons of the other sex with regard to marital or parental status.
( b ) *Financial aid established by certain legal instruments.* ( 1 ) A recipient may administer or assist in the administration of scholarships, fellowships, or other forms of financial assistance established pursuant to domestic or foreign wills, trusts, bequests, or similar legal instruments or by acts of a foreign government that require that awards be made to members of a particular sex specified therein; *Provided,* that the overall effect of the award of such sex-restricted scholarships, fellowships, and other forms of financial assistance does not discriminate on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) To ensure nondiscriminatory awards of assistance as required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, recipients shall develop and use procedures under which: ( i ) Students are selected for award of financial assistance on the basis of nondiscriminatory criteria and not on the basis of availability of funds restricted to members of a particular sex;
( ii ) An appropriate sex-restricted scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance is allocated to each student selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section; and
( iii ) No student is denied the award for which he or she was selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section because of the absence of a scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance designated for a member of that student's sex.
( c ) *Athletic scholarships.* ( 1 ) To the extent that a recipient awards athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid, it must provide reasonable opportunities for such awards for members of each sex in proportion to the number of students of each sex participating in interscholastic or intercollegiate athletics.
( 2 ) A recipient may provide separate athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid for members of each sex as part of separate athletic teams for members of each sex to the extent consistent with this paragraph (c) and § 19.450.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OFTR.A.NSPORTAT!ON 

FEDERAL A VJA TION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

RECEIVED 

FEB 1 1 2013 

HEARING DOCKET 

In the Matter of Central Virginia Aviation, Inc. Respondent 

Docket No. FAA-2012-1263 

Case No. 2012EA210024 

Administrative Law· Judge LE. Sullivan 

JOINTLY PROPOSED SCHEDULING/DISCOVERY PLAN 

The Agency and Central Virginia Aviation, Inc. (Respondent) hereby propose the following 

schedule/discovery plan: 

l. May 1, 2013- deadline for filing initial discovery requests. 

2. July l, 2013 - final deadline for tiling discovery, including motions to compel, 

follow-up discovery requests and depositions. 

3. .September 3, 2013 - deadline tor !11ing of dispositive motions. 

4. October 3, 2013- dct1dline for response to dispositive motions. 

5. October 18, 2013 - deadline for reply (to respond to dispositive motion). 

6. November 18, 2013- exchange of exhibit and witness lists. 
7. December 3, 2013 or thereabouts- Hearing in Richmond, VA 

Respectfully submitted, 

Allred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By: 

Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

l Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 1 1434 

TEL:7 18 553-3258 

FAX: 718 995-5699 

Date: 1 ( '2.. '\ ( (3 

Concu[:~~".._",,, 6~~ David Gates, - ; . 0 

Katherine G. Gray, Esq. 

Counsel for Respondent 

Cowan Gates 

1930 Huguenot Road 

P.O. Box 35655 

Richmond, VA 2323 5 

TEL: 804-320-9100 

FAX: 804-320-2950 

Date: :z.j 'j l3 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Jointly Proposed Scheduling/Discovery Plan has been 

sent via ftrst class mail and facsimile addressed as follows: 

David Gates, Esq. 

Katherine G. Gray, Esq. 

Counsel for Respondent 

Cowan Gates 

1930 Huguenot Road 

P.O. Box 35655 

Riclunond, VA 23235 

TEL: 804-320-9100 

FAX: 804-320-2950 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Te1efax: (202)366-7536 

I hereby certifY that the foregoing Jointly Proposed Scheduling/Discovery Plan has been 

sent via first class mail addressed as follows: 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Room 2014 

Date:. ______ _ FEB - 5 2013 

<I' I ~~ ~ r--7---· t::', 

C/ · Hooks 

Paralegal Specialist 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office ofRegional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434
### Part E—Adult and Dislocated Worker Employment and Training Activities
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-4 January 13, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC SETS PUBLIC MEETING ON INDIAN POINT 1 DECOMMISSIONING PLANS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a meeting on

Wednesday, January 20, to discuss Consolidated Edison Co.’s

decommissioning plans for the permanently shut-down Indian Point

1 nuclear power plant in Buchanan, N.Y.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled

to begin at 7 p.m. at the New York State Armory building, 955

Washington St., Peekskill, N.Y.

NRC staff will make a presentation on agency oversight of

the decommissioning process, while Consolidated Edison

representatives will discuss the facility’s status and

decommissioning program. In addition, there will be an

opportunity for members of the public to ask questions and make

comments relating to the plant’s decommissioning.

Indian Point 1, which was first licensed by the federal

government to operate in 1962, ceased operations on October 31,

1974. Since January 1976, all of the spent fuel from the reactor

has remained in an on-site storage pool. The spent fuel is

expected to remain on site until a federal repository for the

permanent storage of spent fuel is available.

NRC approved Indian Point 1 decommissioning plans in

February 1996. Those plans call for the utility to maintain the

reactor in long-term safe storage (SAFSTOR) until the adjoining

Indian Point 2 reactor, also owned by Consolidated Edison, is

permanently shut down. Both units will be dismantled

concurrently.

Under NRC regulations, the company has 60 years to complete

decommissioning and terminate its license. The regulations also

require the company to periodically update its plans for

decommissioning. Before any significant dismantlement of Indian

Point 1 can occur, Consolidated Edison will be required to inform

the NRC and public of its plans and provide a schedule.

#
#### § 3271.11 Who may apply for a permit to build a utilization facility?

The lessee, the facility operator, or the unit operator may apply to build a utilization facility.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-27   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 1 of 1
#### Francis S. Howell, appellee, v. Jeremiah K. Ross et al., appellants.

Filed May 6, 1903.

No. 12,783.

Judgment: Collateral Attack. The district court being vested with jurisdiction of actions to quiet title, a judgment rendered byvit in such an action is exempt from collateral attack, even though the petition upon which it is based fails to show that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief demanded.

Appeal from the district court for Washington county: Jacob Fawcett, District-Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Clark C. McNish*and *John W. Graham,*for appellants.

*Frank 8. Sowell*and *Albert W. Jeferis, contra.*

Sullivan, C. J.

This action was brought by Howell against Ross and others to foreclose a real estate mortgage. From a decree in favor of the plaintiff, McManigal, who was made a defendant on the theory that he was in possession of the mortgagéd. premises as a tenant of the mortgagor, has'removed the case to this court by appeal. The only question necessary to be decided is the effect of a former judgment rendered by the district court in a suit brought by Ross *2against .McManigal in 1896. The issues tried and determined in that suit were, it is conceded, precisely identical with the issues presented by the answer which McManigal filed in this case. It is conceded, too, that the judgment rendered was in favor of Ross, and that it has been reviewed by this court and affirmed. But it is contended that, the action having been brought to quiet title by one out of possession against one in possession, the court had no authority to entertain it or to pronounce a valid judgment. There is not the least merit in this contention. The question of jurisdiction having been raised and litigated in the district and in this court the decision would be binding upon the parties even if it were wrong. *Dryden v. Parrotte,*61 Neb. 339.

Whether McManigal paid taxes upon the land from 1896 to 1900 is altogether immaterial. The fact is relevant to no issue presented by the pleadings.

The judgment is

Affirmed.
#### Isaac Fragner, Respondent, v. Harry Fischel, Appellant.

Motion granted, without costs, on condition that within ten days the appellant deposit to the credit of this action the sum of $13,500. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ. Order to be settled before the presiding justice.