alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with  the Annual  Report  of Sunburst Acquisitions  III,  Inc. (the "Company") on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  period   ending   August 31,  2005  (the  "Report"), I, Scott MacCaughern, Principal Executive Officer of the   Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.







Date: December 9, 2005



/S/ Scott MacCaughern

Scott MacCaughern (Principal Executive Officer and Director)
----

REPORT

on the annual accounts of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2004 together with the Agency's replies

(2005/C 332/01)

CONTENTS

Tables 1 to 4

The Agency's replies

INTRODUCTION

THE COURT'S OPINION

Reliability of the accountsThe Agency's accounts for the financial year ended 31 December 2004 are, in all material respects, reliable.Legality and regularity of the underlying transactionsThe transactions underlying the Agency's annual accounts, taken as a whole, are legal and regular.The observations which follow do not call the Court's opinion into question.

OBSERVATIONS

This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 5 October 2005.

For the Court of Auditors

Hubert WEBER

President

----

(1)OJ L 240, 7.9.2002, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(3)  These accounts were drawn up on 23 August 2005 and received by the Court on 19 September 2005.

(4)  This loss was due to carry-overs of appropriations that were not covered by the budgetary revenue received.

(5)  Article 16(2) of the Agency's financial regulation.

----

Table 1

European Aviation Safety Agency (Cologne)

Table 2

European Aviation Safety Agency — Implementation of the budget for the financial year 2004

Table 3

European Aviation Safety Agency — Revenue and expenditure account for the financial years 2004 and 2003 (1)

Table 4

European Aviation Safety Agency — Balance sheet as at 31 December 2004 and 31 December 2003 (2)

----

(1)  The data for the financial year 2003 have been restated to make them comparable, following the transition to accruals-based accounting.

Source: Agency data — This table summarises the data supplied by the Agency in its annual accounts.

(2)  The data for the financial year 2003 have been restated to make them comparable, following the transition to accruals-based accounting.

Source: Agency data — This table summarises the data supplied by the Agency in its annual accounts.

----

THE AGENCY'S REPLIES

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has det ermined t hat this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60174 (Summary Calendar)

HAWK WINDWALKER,
Pl aintiff-Appellant,

versus

MARGARET M. RICHARDSON, Commissioner of the I.R.S.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

(3:95CV156-D)

October 22, 1996 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ha wk Windwalker appeals to this court the district court’s order dismissing his p ro se

complaint against Margaret M. Richardson in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Internal

Revenue Service for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Federal2

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Having reviewed the pertinent parts of the record and appellate

briefs and finding no actionable claim, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00591-CV

In the Interest of C.N.L. and C.T.F., Children

On Appeal from the

267th District Court of De Witt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 22-11-25,863

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The Court orders the 

judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. No costs are assessed due to appellant’s 

inability to pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 25, 2024
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-197 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, October 30, 1998)

NRC ISSUES CERTIFICATE TO GENERAL ATOMICS

FOR TRANSPORTATION CASK FOR SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a certificate of compliance to General

Atomics of San Diego, California, for a shipping cask to carry spent fuel from nuclear reactors.

Known as the GA-4 Legal Weight Truck Spent Fuel Shipping Cask, it is designed to

transport a variety of pressurized-water-reactor fuel types. The GA-4 can transport up to four

irradiated spent fuel assemblies, each holding from 176 to 208 fuel rods from 128 to 145 inches

long.

The cask, constructed primarily of stainless steel, is about 188 inches long and 40

inches in diameter. The maximum weight of the cask, with contents, is 27 1⁄2 tons. Since it is a

legal-weight truck cask, under regulations of the Department of Transportation, it can travel on

any highway in the United States.

Issuance of the certificate of compliance constitutes authority for the GA-4 to be used by

nuclear reactor licensees to ship spent fuel, as long as the shipment follows other applicable

regulations of the NRC and of the Department of Transportation.

###
### §1390. Nonapplicability of withdrawal liability for certain temporary contribution obligation periods; exception

(a) An employer who withdraws from a plan in complete or partial withdrawal is not liable to the plan if the employer—

(1) first had an obligation to contribute to the plan after September 26, 1980,

(2) had an obligation to contribute to the plan for no more than the lesser of—

(A) 6 consecutive plan years preceding the date on which the employer withdraws, or

(B) the number of years required for vesting under the plan,

(3) was required to make contributions to the plan for each such plan year in an amount equal to less than 2 percent of the sum of all employer contributions made to the plan for each such year, and

(4) has never avoided withdrawal liability because of the application of this section with respect to the plan.

(b) Subsection (a) shall apply to an employer with respect to a plan only if—

(1) the plan is amended to provide that subsection (a) applies;

(2) the plan provides, or is amended to provide, that the reduction under section 411(a)(3)(E) of title 26 applies with respect to the employees of the employer; and

(3) the ratio of the assets of the plan for the plan year preceding the first plan year for which the employer was required to contribute to the plan to the benefit payments made during that plan year was at least 8 to 1.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title IV, §4210, as added Pub. L. 96–364, title I, §104(2), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1226; amended Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7891(a)(1), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2445; Pub. L. 109–280, title II, §204(c)(1), Aug. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 887.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (b)(1) to (4). Pub. L. 109–280 redesignated pars. (2) to (4) as (1) to (3), respectively, and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: "the plan is not a plan which primarily covers employees in the building and construction industry;".

1989—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 101–239 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954", which for purposes of codification was translated as "title 26" thus requiring no change in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2006 Amendment

Pub. L. 109–280, title II, §204(c)(3), Aug. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 887, provided that: "The amendments made by this subsection [amending this section and section 1391 of this title] shall apply with respect to plan withdrawals occurring on or after January 1, 2007."

#### Effective Date of 1989 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–239 effective, except as otherwise provided, as if included in the provision of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99–514, to which such amendment relates, see section 7891(f) of Pub. L. 101–239, set out as a note under section 1002 of this title.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-41709 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee

v. JOSE LUIS MORALES-FRANCO Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-02-CR-740-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Luis Morales-Franco pled guilty to a charge of being found unlawfully present in the United States after having been deported following convicted for a felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). He appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court lacked a proper basis for determining that his underlying conviction was a drug trafficking offense for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). However, the abstract ofNo. 02-41709 -2- judgment relied upon by the district court reflected that Morales-Franco was convicted of selling marijuana. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the preponderance of the evidence supported the assessment of the sentencing enhancement.
See United States v. Herrera-Solorzano , 114 F.3d 48, 50 (5th Cir. 1997). As Morales-Franco concedes, his second argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). In the absence of any convincing argument, the sentence imposed by the district court is AFFIRMED.
PUBLIC LAW 109–30—JULY 12, 2005 119 STAT. 373

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1460:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Apr. 6, considered and passed House.

June 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–30

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6200 Rolling

Road in Springfield, Virginia, as the ‘‘Captain Mark Stubenhofer Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

6200 Rolling Road in Springfield, Virginia, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Captain Mark Stubenhofer Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain

Mark Stubenhofer Post Office Building’’.

Approved July 12, 2005.

July 12, 2005

[H.R. 1460]
### I4l 00 2 03/17/2008 08:50 FAX 

## Avenal Power Center, LLC 500 Dallas Street, Level 31 Houston, TX 77002

February 15,2008 

### Mr. Gerardo Rios**Chie1~** Permits Office USEPA Region IX 

### 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105


### Subject: Avenal. Energy Project Application for a Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration 

### Pennit Dear Mr. Rios: Enclosedplease find an Application for a Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration 

### (PSD) Pennit for the proposed Avenal Energy Project, tiled. by Avenal Power Center, LLC, to be located between the San Luis Canal (California Aqueduct) andthe Avenal CutoffRoad) six miles 

### northeast ofthe 

### City of

### Avenal in Kings County, 

### CA. This AFC 

### is being filed 

### with the Ca,1ifomia Energy Commission on February 19, 2008. The portions of

### the AFe materials that are relevant to the 

### PSD pennitting process, as well. as air quality modeling data on compact disc, are enclosed for your review. The Project consists 

### oftwo General 

### Electric 7FA gas turbines 

### with heatrecovery steam generators (HRSGs) and duct burners, one steam turbine, one auxiliary boiler, one emergency standby generator engine, and one emergency standby flre water pump engine. 

### All ofthe equipment will be fired on natural gas exclusively withthe exception ofthe emergency standby fire water pwnp engine, which will be fueled with ultra-low sulfur (15 ppmw) Diesel fuel. The turbines and HRSGs 

### will be equipped with 

### dry low-NOx burners, 

### selective catalytic**reduction~** and oxidation catalysts to minimize emissions. Ifyou have 

### any questions regarding this application, please contactthe applicant's representative Jim Rexroad at 

### 713·275·6147 or Eric Walther at 

### Siena Research**(916-444~6666).**

# ~Il}; Stuart Zisman Avenal Power Center, LLC enclosure
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-5   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      OF THE


PRINCIPAL
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Peter
      J. Bergmann, the Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer of YP Corp.,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of YP Corp. on Form
      10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of YP Corp.





Date:
                November 30, 2005
            */s/
              Peter J. Bergmann*Peter
              J. BergmannChief
              Executive Officer




I,
      W.
      Chris Broquist, the Chief Financial Officer of YP Corp., certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of YP Corp. on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal
      year ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of YP
      Corp.





Date:
                  November 30, 2005
              */s/
                W. Chris Broquist*W.
                Chris BroquistChief
                  Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-1 (333-150746) of Etelos, Inc. of our report dated March 17,2010 relating to the financial statements which appear in this annual report onForm 10-K.

 

 
|                       | /s/  STONEFIELD JOSEPHSON, INC.  |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                       | Stonefield  Josephson, Inc. |
|                       |                             |
|                       |                             |
| San  Francisco, California |                             |
| March 17,  2010       |                             |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection  with this annual  report on Form 10-KSB of United  Tennessee
Bankshares,  Inc.,  I,  Chris  H.  Triplett,   Controller  of  United  Tennessee
Bankshares,  Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in this report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of United Tennessee Bankshares, Inc.



Date:  March 29, 2004                 /s/ Chris H. Triplett
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Chris H. Triplett
                                      Controller
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateGeneric IssuesHow to Propose a New Generic Issue

# Contact a Generic Issues Program Representative

Contact a Generic Issues Program representative if you have any questions.

If you need to report a safety concern, please do not use this page. Instead, please see Report a Safety or Security Concern.

Would you like to remain anonymous?:*

YesNo

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, May 08, 2020
SCAD-18-0000796

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner,

vs.

WILLIAM H. WHITEHEAD, III,

Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(ODC 18-O-007)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR RECIPROCAL DISCIPLINE

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the reply filed by Respondent

William H. Whitehead III to this court’s November 7, 2018 notice

and order of contemplated reciprocal discipline, pursuant to Rule

2.15(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i

(RSCH), and the record in this matter, it clearly appears that

the conduct established therein does not warrant discipline in

this jurisdiction. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition from the Office

of Disciplinary Counsel for the imposition of reciprocal

discipline is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 6, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCAD-18-0000796

06-FEB-2019

01:42 PM
§ 206.116 Recovery of funds. ( a ) The applicant must agree to repay to FEMA (when funds are provided by FEMA) and/or the State (when funds are provided by the State) from insurance proceeds or recoveries from any other source an amount equivalent to the value of the assistance provided. In no event must the amount repaid to FEMA and/or the State exceed the amount that the applicant recovers from insurance or any other source.
( b ) An applicant must return funds to FEMA and/or the State (when funds are provided by the State) when FEMA and/or the State determines that the assistance was provided erroneously, that the applicant spent the funds inappropriately, or that the applicant obtained the assistance through fraudulent means.
[67 FR 61452, Sept. 30, 2002; 67 FR 62896, Oct. 9, 2002]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134437 (61) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

KENT A. MCNEIL, FRANKLIN E. FISHER, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, ROGER GRIFFIN, SCOTT WAY, and JEFF Justices LEGATO, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 134437 

 COA: 272410 

Charlevoix CC: 05-088120-CZ 

CHARLEVOIX COUNTY and NORTHWEST
 MICHIGAN COMMUNITY HEALTH 

AGENCY,
 Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of May 2, 2008, the Court directed the parties to file supplemental briefs 

no later than 28 days after the date of its order. On order of the Court, the defendant 

Northwest Michigan Community Health Agency’s motion to extend time to file 

supplemental brief by 28 days is GRANTED. 

s0616 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 23, 2008 

 Clerk
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 44

**Question 44:** During 1993, the licensee performed a prospective dose evaluation, and decided not to measure internal dose. In 1994, the licensee again evaluates the internal dose and finds that the threshold for monitoring is exceeded and begins monitoring. Nothing in the facility (engineering controls or productivity levels) has changed. The licensee accounts for the internal dose contribution when calculating TEDE for 1994. Must the licensee go back and adjust TEDE for 1993?

**Answer:** Yes, the licensee must go back and adjust the TEDE for 1993, based on the best available data. The information included in the question indicates that the 1993 prospective evaluation was in error and that internal dose should have been measured; therefore, this error needs to be corrected.

 (Reference: 10 CFR 20.1502)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
### §1556. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Advisory Commission to carry out section 1551 of this title and section 1552 of this title, $500,000 for each of fiscal years 1995 and 1996.

(Pub. L. 104–4, title III, §306, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 70.)
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateResearch

# Nuclear Materials Safety Research

## Probabilistic Risk Analysis

The NRC's 1995 Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Policy Statement states that "the use of PRA technology should be increased in all regulatory matters to the extent supported by the state-of-the-art in PRA methods and data..." NRC's PRA research program contributes to the implementation of this policy, in that it applies current methods and data to the resolution of reactor safety issues facing the staff, as well as develops and demonstrates new state-of-the-art PRA methods.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 7, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Nuclear Reactor Safety Research
          - Nuclear Materials Safety Research
          - Radioactive Waste Safety Research
          - Fire Research Program
          - Accident Sequence Precursor (ASP) Program
          - The Radiation Protection Computer Code Analysis and Maintenance Program (RAMP)
          - The Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)
          - Digital Instrumentation and Controls (I&C) Research
          - State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA)
          - Computer Codes
          - Obtaining the Codes
          - Navigating Space Nuclear Safety: The Role of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
          - Analysis of Cancer Risk in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 7, 2020