alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 3 6 7 9 10 14 11 12

PLNTNAMEPLNTCODEGENCODESTATUS PRIMEMOVER ENERGY_SOURCE_1 NAMEPLATESUMMCAP

79_1 Aurora Energy LLC Chena 79 1 RP ST SUB 6.3 6.25

3753_1 West Charleston3753 1 RP HY WAT 0.7 0.7

3753_IC4 West Charleston3753 IC4 RP IC DFO 1.4 0.9

634_ST1 P L Bartow 634 ST1 RP ST RFO 127.5 121

634_ST2 P L Bartow 634 ST2 RP ST RFO 127.5 199

634_ST3 P L Bartow 634 ST3 RP ST RFO 239.3 204

389_3 El Centro 389 3 RP ST NG 129 121

6189_1 Rocky Mountain Hy6189dro1 RP PS WAT 83 62

6189_2 Rocky Mountain Hy6189dro2 RP PS WAT 83 62

6189_3 Rocky Mountain Hy6189dro3 RP PS WAT 83 62

54532_2WHShenango Neville Island Coke W 54532 2WH orks RP ST OG 5 4.65

688_2 Arvah B Hopkins 688 2 RP ST NG 259.2 -88

3443_5 Victoria 3443 5 RP ST NG 180 172
13 26 27

WINTCAP CURRENT_YEAR NEWPRIMEMOVER

6.25 2007 #N/A

0.7 2009 #N/A

0.9 2007 #N/A

125 2009 #N/A

124 2009 #N/A

215 2009 #N/A

129 2010 #N/A

62 2008 #N/A

62 2009 #N/A

62 2007 #N/A

4.7 2007 #N/A

-88 2008 #N/A

172 2008 3443
PCGenY06

1 2 3 4 5

UTILNAME PLNTNAME STATE UTILCODE

79_1 Aurora Energy LLC Aurora Energy LLC Chena AK 986

3753_1 Barton Village, Inc West Charleston VT 1299

3753_IC4 Barton Village, Inc West Charleston VT 1299

634_ST1 Progress Energy Florida Inc P L Bartow FL 6455

634_ST2 Progress Energy Florida Inc P L Bartow FL 6455

634_ST3 Progress Energy Florida Inc P L Bartow FL 6455

389_3 Imperial Irrigation District El Centro CA 9216

6189_1 Oglethorpe Power Corporation Rocky Mountain Hydro GA 13994

6189_2 Oglethorpe Power Corporation Rocky Mountain Hydro GA 13994

6189_3 Oglethorpe Power Corporation Rocky Mountain Hydro GA 13994

54532_2WHShenango Inc Shenango Neville Island Coke Works PA 17062

688_2 City of Tallahassee Arvah B Hopkins FL 18445

3443_5 NuCoastal Power Corporation Victoria TX 54907

Page 1
PCGenY06

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

PLNTCODEGENCODEOWNER STATUS PRIMEMOVER NAMEPLATESUMMCAPWINTCAP ENERGY_SOURCE_1

79 1 S RP ST 6.3 6.25 6.25 SUB

3753 1 S RP HY 0.7 0.7 0.7 WAT

3753 IC4 S RP IC 1.4 0.9 0.9 DFO

634 ST1 S RP ST 127.5 121 125 RFO

634 ST2 S RP ST 127.5 199 124 RFO

634 ST3 S RP ST 239.3 204 215 RFO

389 3 S RP ST 129 121 129 NG

6189 1 J RP PS 83 62 62 WAT

6189 2 J RP PS 83 62 62 WAT

6189 3 J RP PS 83 62 62 WAT

54532 2WH S RP ST 5 4.65 4.7 OG

688 2 S RP ST 259.2 -88 -88 NG

3443 5 S RP ST 180 172 172 NG

Page 2
PCGenY06

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

OPERATION_TRANSPORTATION_1A ENERGY_SOURCE_2 OPERATION_TRANSPORTATION_2A ENERGY_SOURCE_3 ENERGY_SOURCE_4 ENERGY_SOURCE_5 ENERGY_SOURCE_6 UNIT_CODEFFECTIVE_MONTH

RR F302 6

WA 4

TK 1

WA 6

WA 6

WA 6

PL 3

WA 5

WA 5

WA 5

PL DFO PL NG 1

PL DFO TK 5

PL 4

Page 3
PCGenY06

24 25 26 27 28 29

EFFECTIVE_YEAR CURRENT_MONTH CURRENT_YEAR NEWPRIMEMOVER

2007 6 2007 2007

2009 4 2009 2009

2007 1 2007 2007

2009 6 2009 2009

2009 6 2009 2009

2009 6 2009 2009

2010 3 2010 2010

2008 5 2008 2008

2009 5 2009 2009

2007 5 2007 2007

2007 10 2007 2007

2008 5 2008 2008

2008 4 2008 2008

Page 4
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-107

December 30, 1999

NRC TO HOLD "ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION" AT PUBLIC MEETING

IN OSWEGO, N.Y., ON NEW REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROGRAM

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with invited community leaders,

industry representatives and members of public interest groups on Thursday, January 6, 2000, for

a "roundtable" discussion of the agency’s new reactor oversight process. A pilot program for the

new process is currently in use at the James A. FitzPatick nuclear power plant, located in Scriba,

N.Y.

The meeting will be held from 7 to 9 p.m. at the Econo Lodge Hotel, 70 East First

Street, in Oswego, N.Y. The roundtable discussion portion of the meeting will be open for

public observation. Members of the public will have an opportunity to present their views to

NRC officials afterward.

The FitzPatrick plant, operated by the New York Power Authority, is one of 13 plants

at nine sites nationwide participating in the pilot program, which began June 1 to allow for

testing and adjustments to the new oversight process. A public meeting is planned for each site.

Following a trial period lasting several months, to determine if revisions are needed, the process

is expected to be extended next year to all 103 U.S. commercial nuclear power reactors.

The NRC is seeking input from the public on the new process, which is designed to

maintain safety, improve public confidence, increase efficiency and effectiveness, and reduce

unnecessary regulatory burden. The changes reflect, in part, improvements in nuclear power

plant safety performance over the past 20 years. Plants that perform well generally will have less

regulatory oversight than plants that have problems.

In addition to FitzPatrick, the pilot plant sites are: (1) Salem 1 and 2, in Hancocks

Bridge, N.J, operated by Public Service Electric & Gas (PSE&G) Co.; (2) Hope Creek,

Hancocks Bridge, N.J., also operated by PSE&G; (3) Shearon Harris, near Raleigh, N.C.,

operated by Carolina Power & Light Co.; (4) Sequoyah 1 and 2, near Chattanooga, Tenn.,

operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority; (5) Prairie Island 1 and 2, near Minneapolis, Minn.,

operated by Northern States Power Co.; (6) Quad Cities 1 and 2, near Moline, Ill., operated by

Commonwealth Edison Co.; (7) Ft. Calhoun, near Omaha, Neb., operated by the Omaha Public

Power District; and (8) Cooper, near Nebraska City, Neb., operated by the Nebraska Public

Power District.
Information on the new oversight program, including a list of questions that will be

discussed at the roundtable meeting, is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html.

#
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-150 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, July 15, 1999)

NRC HOSTED TABLETOP EXERCISE IN PREPARATION FOR Y2K

As part of preparations for the “Year 2000", the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

conducted a tabletop exercise and training yesterday with Federal, State, and local

organizations, and a nuclear utility to share information and understand how contingency plans

would be used in response to a potential Year 2000 computer problem at a nuclear power plant

after midnight on December 31.

Chairman Greta Joy Dicus indicated, in her opening remarks at the exercise, that the

NRC and the nuclear industry have been pursuing a comprehensive program for dealing with

potential Y2K problems at nuclear power plants and other nuclear facilities. The full text of her

speech is available on NRC’s website at www.nrc.gov/OPA/ .

About 50 participants representing NRC, Baltimore Gas and Electric -- licensee for

Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant located near Lusby, Md.,--the Federal Emergency

Management Agency, the National Communications System (organization), the State of

Maryland, Calvert County, and St. Mary’s County, discussed a number of scenarios involving

loss of communication among the various players, loss of offsite power to the nuclear power

plant site, and the loss of power to NRC’s Emergency Operations Center in Rockville, Md.

Under each scenario, participants explained their roles and the procedures that would be

followed should a Y2K problem occur during the December 31 - January 1 transition period.

The exercise served to share information among the various organizations to assure all

response efforts are coordinated and communicated effectively to protect public health and

safety in the event of a Y2K-initiated event at a nuclear power plant. It also served to refine

NRC’s Y2K Contingency Plan implementing procedures and prepare for a full-scale Y2K

exercise to be conducted October 15.

All 103 operating nuclear power plants have reported their safety systems are Y2K

ready. Sixty-eight of them have indicated that all of their systems --safety and non-safety-- are

Y2K ready. The remaining 35 plants reported having to complete work on a few non-safety

computer systems or devices to be fully Y2K ready.

The “Year 2000" or “Y2K” problem refers to a computers’ potential inability to recognize

dates beginning with January 1, 2000, and beyond. It arises from computer programs that use

two-digit numbers to represent a calendar year (such as “98" for 1998). For example, computer

systems could read “00" as 1900, rather than 2000, potentially causing computer systems to

malfunction. “Y2K ready” means that functions provided by computer systems will be carried

out successfully with the coming of the Year 2000.
A synopsis of the tabletop exercise will be available shortly on the NRC’s Y2K website

at: www.nrc.gov/NRC/NEWS/year2000.html. The NRC’s Y2K Contingency Plan is currently

available at this website.

#
§ 312.6 Materials and facilities. FEMA also contributes to the development and support of emergency management in the States and their political subdivisions, and to the development, operation, and maintenance of specific programs, through providing certain materials and facilities. The following may be used for natural disaster purposes provided that such usage is consistent with, contributes to, and does not detract from attack-related civil defense preparedness: ( a ) Materials provided and maintained through contributions under the Act.
( b ) Technical information, guidance through which technical assistance is provided, and training courses, may contain examples, illustrations, discussion, suggested applications and uses of material.
( c ) Equipment loaned under provisions of the Contributions Project Loan Program.
( d ) Facilities, such as Emergency Operating Centers, provided and maintained through contributions under the Act.
( e ) Equipment loaned or granted to the States for civil defense purposes (e.g., radiological instruments, shelter supplies).
|                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Assessing the Soviet Threat: The Early Cold War Years |
|                                                  | **Foreword**
 **Preface**
Woodrow J. Kuhns -- Editor**Chronology**
 **Documents**
 **About the Editor**
Publications Page | CSI Homepage |
#### Riviera Realty Company, Respondent, *v.*Illinois Surety Company, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, made at Special Term and entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 3d day of May, 1915, directing the defendant to file and serve a bill of particulars.

Per Curiam

: The order appealed from should be modified by requiring the defendant to furnish a bill of particulars as specified in the 3d clause of the order to show cause, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.907 Filing and service.

The provisions of § 134.204 apply to the filing and service of all pleadings and other submissions permitted under this subpart unless otherwise indicated in this subpart.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 1796

_____________________________
L LOYD D. S HANNON J R , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. John Jay Gontarek , Judge

. September 18, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
M AKAR , O STERHAUS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Lloyd D. Shannon Jr
, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-61 May 22, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission meeting to discuss a

safety assessment of the Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant has

been rescheduled. Initially planned for Wednesday, May 27, the

meeting will now take place on Thursday, June 4, at 1 p.m.

The session will be held in the Energy Education Center

at the plant, located in Buchanan, N.Y. It will be open to the

public for observation.

In response to NRC concerns, Indian Point 2's operator,

Consolidated Edison of New York Company, conducted an Independent

Safety Assessment in April, with the results submitted to the NRC

earlier this month. The review was designed to provide a better

understanding of problems and weaknesses affecting the facility.

The plant, which shut down in October because of

electrical circuit breaker problems, remains out of service.

#
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-72 August 5, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC AUGMENTED INSPECTION TEAM TO REVIEW

CIRCUIT BREAKER FAILURE AT CLINTON NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a

special inspection at the Clinton Nuclear Power Station following

the failure of a circuit breaker early Tuesday (August 5) during

a change of cooling system pumps. The plant, which is operated

by Illinois Power Company, is near Clinton, Illinois.

The utility was preparing to start the Clinton plant up

following a shutdown which began September 5, 1996. The circuit

breaker failure will delay the startup.

About 4 a.m. on Tuesday the utility was changing from one

pump to another in the plant's shutdown cooling system. During

the changing of pumps, a circuit breaker should have opened to

shut off power to one of the pumps. The 4,160 volt circuit

breaker, however, failed to open when it received the 'open'

signal from plant operators.

The cause of the circuit breaker failure is not known. A

similar circuit breaker failed to open on July 22. The utility

attributed that failure to a malfunction of the actuating springs

that open the circuit breaker.

The inspection will begin Wednesday. The Augmented

Inspection Team (AIT) will include electrical specialists and

other inspectors from the NRC's regional office in Lisle,

Illinois, and from its headquarters in Rockville, Maryland.

The AIT will present its preliminary findings to the utility

in a meeting, open to public observation. The time and place of

the meeting will be announced later. The team will subsequently

issue a written report which will be available to the public.

#####
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Angel Lopez

*Joseph G. Bruckmann,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*James M. Bernardi,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 12, 1986

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 5 Conn. App. 599, is denied.
### §2619. Notice

#### (a) In general

Each employer shall post and keep posted, in conspicuous places on the premises of the employer where notices to employees and applicants for employment are customarily posted, a notice, to be prepared or approved by the Secretary, setting forth excerpts from, or summaries of, the pertinent provisions of this subchapter and information pertaining to the filing of a charge.

#### (b) Penalty

Any employer that willfully violates this section may be assessed a civil money penalty not to exceed $100 for each separate offense.

(Pub. L. 103–3, title I, §109, Feb. 5, 1993, 107 Stat. 19.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 6 months after Feb. 5, 1993, except that, in the case of collective bargaining agreements in effect on that effective date, section applicable on the earlier of (1) the date of termination of such agreement, or (2) the date that occurs 12 months after Feb. 5, 1993, see section 405(b) of Pub. L. 103–3, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.137 Records of use. ( a ) *Maintenance by importer.* The importer shall maintain accurate and detailed records showing the use or other disposition of the imported merchandise. The burden shall be on the importer to keep records so that the claim of actual use can be readily established.
( b ) *Retention of records.* The importer shall retain records of use or disposition for a period of 3 years from the date of liquidation of the entry.
( c ) *Examination of records.* The rec- ords required to be kept by paragraph (a) of this section shall be available at all times for examination and inspection by an authorized Customs officer.
[T.D. 71-139, 36 FR 10726, June 2, 1971]
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.1009 Certification for goods exported to Korea. ( a ) *Submission of certification to CBP.* Any person who completes and issues a certification for a good exported from the United States to Korea must provide a copy of the certification (written or electronic) to CBP upon request.
( b ) *Notification of errors in certification.* Any person who completes and issues a certification for a good exported from the United States to Korea and who has reason to believe that the certification contains or is based on incorrect information must promptly notify every person to whom the certification was provided of any change that could affect the accuracy or validity of the certification. Notification of an incorrect certification must also be given either in writing or via an authorized electronic data interchange system to CBP specifying the correction (*see* §§ 10.1032 and 10.1033 of this subpart).
( c ) *Maintenance of records* — ( 1 ) *General.* Any person who completes and issues a certification for a good exported from the United States to Korea must maintain, for a period of at least five years after the date the certification was issued, all records and supporting documents relating to the origin of a good for which the certification was issued, including the certification or copies thereof and records and documents associated with: ( i ) The purchase, cost, and value of, and payment for, the good;
( ii ) The purchase, cost, and value of, and payment for, all materials, including indirect materials, used in the production of the good; and
( iii ) The production of the good in the form in which the good was exported.
( 2 ) *Method of maintenance.* The records referred to in paragraph (c)(1) of this section must be maintained as provided in § 163.5 of this chapter.
( 3 ) *Availability of records.* For purposes of determining compliance with the provisions of this part, the records required to be maintained under this section must be stored and made available for examination and inspection by the Center director or other appropriate CBP officer in the same manner as provided in part 163 of this chapter.
[77 FR 15948, Mar. 19, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 32358, May 30, 2013]
### §186. Library of Congress orders under task and delivery order contracts

#### (a) Contract modifications

An order issued under a task order contract or a delivery order contract (as such terms are defined in section 4101 of title 41) entered into by the Librarian of Congress may not increase the scope, period, or maximum value of the contract under which the order is issued. The scope, period, or maximum value of the contract may be increased only by modification of the contract.

#### (b) Omitted

#### (c) Protests

#### (1) Protest not authorized

A protest to an order described in subsection (a) filed pursuant to the procedures in subchapter V of chapter 35 of title 31 is not authorized unless such protest—

(A) is an objection on the basis that the order is in violation of subsection (a); or

(B) concerns an order valued in excess of $10,000,000.

#### (2) Jurisdiction over protests

Notwithstanding section 3556 of title 31, the Comptroller General shall have exclusive jurisdiction of a protest authorized under paragraph (1)(B).

#### (d) Effective date

This section and the amendment made by this section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2022 and each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 117–103, div. I, title I, §142, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 519.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 142 of div. I of Pub. L. 117–103. Subsec. (b) of section 142 of div. I of Pub. L. 117–103 amended section 6102 of Title 41, Public Contracts.
### §2635. Powers

#### (a) Meetings

The Commission shall first meet not later than 30 days after the date on which all members are appointed, and the Commission shall meet thereafter on the call of the chairperson or a majority of the members.

#### (b) Hearings and sessions

The Commission may hold such hearings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such evidence as the Commission considers appropriate. The Commission may administer oaths or affirmations to witnesses appearing before it.

#### (c) Access to information

The Commission may secure directly from any Federal agency information necessary to enable it to carry out this subchapter, if the information may be disclosed under section 552 of title 5. Subject to the previous sentence, on the request of the chairperson or vice chairperson of the Commission, the head of such agency shall furnish such information to the Commission.

#### (d) Use of facilities and services

Upon the request of the Commission, the head of any Federal agency may make available to the Commission any of the facilities and services of such agency.

#### (e) Personnel from other agencies

On the request of the Commission, the head of any Federal agency may detail any of the personnel of such agency to serve as an Executive Director of the Commission or assist the Commission in carrying out the duties of the Commission. Any detail shall not interrupt or otherwise affect the civil service status or privileges of the Federal employee.

#### (f) Voluntary service

Notwithstanding section 1342 of title 31, the chairperson of the Commission may accept for the Commission voluntary services provided by a member of the Commission.

(Pub. L. 103–3, title III, §305, Feb. 5, 1993, 107 Stat. 25.)