alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued May 28, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00092-CV

NO. 01-14-00097-CV

NO. 01-14-00098-CV

———————————

IN THE INTEREST OF D.S., D.S.M. AKA D.M., D.R.K., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 2012-44551, 2012-03840J, 2010-78722

1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

1 Appellate cause number 01-14-00092-CV; trial court cause number 2012-44551.

Appellate cause number 01-14-00097-CV; trial court cause number 2012-03840J.

Appellate cause number 01-14-00098-CV; trial court cause number 2010-78722.
2

Appellant, Ebonee Shantrell Miles, appeals the trial court’s final orders

terminating her parental rights to the three minor children, D.S., D.S.M. aka D.M., 

and D.R.K. Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, along 

with an Anders brief, asserting that the appeals are without merit and that there are 

no arguable grounds for reversal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 

1396 (1967). We affirm the trial court’s judgments and grant counsel’s motion to 

withdraw.

The procedures set forth in Anders are applicable to an appeal from a trial 

court’s order terminating parental rights when, as here, the appellant’s appointed 

appellate counsel concludes that there are no non-frivolous issues to assert on 

appeal. See In re D.D., 279 S.W.3d 849, 849–50 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, pet. 

denied); In re D.E.S., 135 S.W.3d 326, 329 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 

2004, no pet.); In re K.D., 127 S.W.3d 66, 67 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 

2003, no pet.). 

Counsel has filed an Anders brief in which he concludes that, after a 

thorough review of the record, appellant’s appeals of the termination of her

parental rights are frivolous and without merit. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S.

Ct. at 1400; In re D.E.S., 135 S.W.3d at 327, 330; In re K.D., 127 S.W.3d at 67. 

Counsel has certified that he delivered a copy of the brief to appellant and has 
3

informed appellant of her right to examine the appellate records and to file a 

response. See In re K.D., 127 S.W.3d at 67. Appellant has not filed a response.

We have independently reviewed the entire record in each appeal and 

counsel’s Anders brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; In re 

D.E.S., 135 S.W.3d at 330; In re K.D., 127 S.W.3d at 67. We agree with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeals are frivolous and without merit.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgments of the trial court and grant counsel’s 

motion to withdraw.

2

 Attorney Tristan H. Longino must immediately send the 

notice required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5(c) and file a copy of the 

notice with the Clerk of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(c).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.

 

2 Appointed counsel still has a duty to inform appellant of the result of these appeals

and notify appellant that she may, on her own, pursue petitions for review in the 

Supreme Court of Texas. See In re K.D., 127 S.W.3d 66, 68 n.3 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.).
#### § 136.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 136.150, no qualified individual with handicaps shall, because the Agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with handicaps, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the Agency.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-17   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 1 of 2

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-17   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 2 of 2
### SUBCHAPTER III—SEASONAL AGRICULTURAL WORKER PROTECTIONS
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-211 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, November 24, 1998)

NEW NRC RULE SETS UP STREAMLINED PROCESS

FOR HEARINGS IN LICENSE TRANSFER CASES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has amended its regulations to set up a

streamlined process for conducting hearings on requests for license transfers for either

nuclear power plants or nuclear materials.

The new rule is effective upon its publication in the Federal Register, expected

shortly. Its adoption is part of a broader effort to improve the effectiveness of NRC

programs and procedures. Last year, the NRC handled more than 20 reactor related

license transfer cases, as compared with an average of two or three annually in earlier

years. The Commission believes this rule amendment will lead to more efficient

handling of any hearings that are conducted on license transfer requests brought on by

the deregulation of the electric industry.

Under the new regulation, hearings on license transfer applications will use

informal proceedings rather than procedures resembling a courtroom trial.

This informal approach is similar to the one used for hearings on NRC import

and export permit applications. The Commission believes informal hearings are

especially appropriate because license transfers normally do not involve the kind of

complex technical issues that historically have been dealt with in formal proceedings

before a multi-discipline licensing board.

Other highlights of the new rule:

ˇ Hearings are to be conducted so that, for routine license transfer cases,

final Commission action on a requested transfer can be expected six to

eight months after an application has been filed.

ˇ The full Commission, or one or more commissioners, may preside at a

hearing, or an appointed presiding officer may do so.
ˇ Questions will be asked only by the presiding officer. There will be no

cross-examination, but parties may submit recommended questions to the

presiding officer.

ˇ All parties will have the opportunity to present oral testimony.

ˇ There will be no discovery process by which the parties seek information

from each other, but a hearing docket must be available in the NRC Public

Document Room containing all relevant documents and correspondence.

ˇ The criteria for granting hearing requests are unchanged. But, as an

alternative to filing an intervention petition, interested persons may submit

written comments on a proposed license transfer, which the Commission

will consider.

The NRC published a proposed rule on this subject for comment in September.

It developed the final rule after analyzing 16 comments received, virtually all of which

were favorable.

###
NRC Chronology Identificatio n FR Notic e (State Due Date) RATS IdP5.9/(NRC Chronology )TjETBT21TT0 1 Tf01.0008 Tc 0.0080.4w 9 0 0 8 9 168.ina726 0997fTm(Id)TjETBT/TT413.0157 9 0 0 8 9 168l (F)NRC Chronology NRC Chronology TS 4Tj
ET
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
9 T
BT
/TT0 1 BT
41 Tf
0.0002 Tc 00 Tr 9 0 0 9 396 0.Rev726 0997fTm
(Id)Tj
ET
BT
/TT009.2107r 9 0 0 9 39i726 0997fTm
(Id)Tj
ET
BT
/TT411.7329 0 0 9 205.51w726 0997fTm
(Id)Tj
ET
BT
/TT42624809 0 0 9 205.59/(NRC Chronology )Tj
ET
BT1/TT0 1 Tf08 Tf
0.0002 Tc 00 Tr 0 0 9 168.4Y, NNRC Chronology NRC Chronology
### §82. Arizona

Arizona constitutes one judicial district.

Court shall be held at Flagstaff, Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, Tucson, and Yuma.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 874; Pub. L. 116–40, §1, Aug. 9, 2019, 133 Stat. 1063.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §143 (June 20, 1910, ch. 310, §31, 36 Stat. 576; Oct. 3, 1913, ch. 17, §§1, 2, 38 Stat. 203).

A provision for transfer of causes, civil or criminal, from one place for holding court to another was omitted. Such provision, as to civil cases, is covered by section 1404 of this title, and, as to criminal cases, is rendered unnecessary because of inherent power of the court and Rules 18–20 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, relating to venue.

A provision for making an interlocutory order at any place designated for holding court was omitted as unnecessary in view of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 77(b).

A provision requiring the clerk to keep his office at the State capital was omitted as covered by section 751 of this title.

Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–40 substituted "Flagstaff, Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, Tucson, and Yuma" for "Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, and Tucson".
#### In the Matter of Arbitration between Cadillac Textiles Incorporated, Respondent, and Edward Shill et al., Copartners Doing Business under the *761Name of Shill Bros., Appellants.

No opinion. In affirming we assume that delivery of the merchandise and payment therefor will be concurrent. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### PART I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.
5841.
Registration of firearms.
5842.
Identification of firearms.
5843.
Records and returns.
5844.
Importation.
5845.
Definitions.
5846.
Other laws applicable.
5847.
Effect on other laws.
5848.
Restrictive use of information.
5849.
Citation of chapter.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–141, div. U, title IV, §401(a)(251), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1196, substituted "Effect on other laws" for "Effect on other law" in item 5847.
Biomass Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov Content Last Updated: 04/02/2008 Search Help More Search Options
Printable Version 

# Biochemical Conversion This area focuses on the research, development and demonstration of biological processes that convert biomass to biofuels, chemicals, and power.

z 

### Biochemical processes also complement thermochemical conversion by providing residual materials

for further processing.

z 

### Biochemical conversion will advance in the future by enhancing fuel yields in integrated biorefineries

which combine conversion types with heat and power efficiencies to produce fuel and products. Lignocellulose (mainly lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose), is the primary component of plant residues, woody materials and grasses. The cell walls or these plant matters are comprised of long chains of sugars (carbohydrates), which can be converted to biofuels. Biochemical conversion breaks down the cell wall through the introduction of enzymes or acid in order to extract the sugars which are then converted to biofuels using microorganisms. Due to the complex structure of the cell wall it is more difficult to break down into sugars, making this material more expensive to convert to biofuels. A key to developing cost-competitive cellulosic biofuels is reducing the processing and capital cost and improving the efficiency of separating and converting cellulosic biomass into fermentable sugars. Current R&D focuses on high-yield feedstocks, more efficient enzymes, and more robust microorganisms to advance biochemical conversion processes.

Printable Version Site Map EERE Information Center Programs and Offices



### Quick Links
z z z z

z z Biomass FAQs

Program Overview Program Research Financial Opportunities Publications Contact Us 

# Page 1 of 1 Biomass Program: Biochemical Conversion

7/16/2010 http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/biochemical_conversion.html
Secure Mailbox ? HELP

VIEW MESSAGE

SUBJECT: 2014 Clark County Air Quality Annual Monitoring Network Plan 

FROM: Hameed@ClarkCountyNV.gov

TO: blumenfeld.jared@epa.gov

CC:

wiker@ClarkCountyNV.gov , Kurpius.Meredith@epa.gov , Hoag.Katherine@epa.gov , 

plate.mathew@epa.gov , FELIX.ELFEGO@EPA.GOV , ford.roy@epa.gov , 

Wallenmeyer@ClarkCountyNV.gov , Nowinski@ClarkCountyNV.gov , 

DEYO@ClarkCountyNV.gov , Hameed@ClarkCountyNV.gov , 

Sherrie.Rogge@clarkcountynv.gov

SENT: Tue 03 Jun 2014 13:37:22 PDT

EXPIRES: Thu 11 Sep 2014 13:37:22 PDT

Reply Reply to All 

Dear Mr. Blumenfeld, 

In accordance with 40 CFR 58.10, Clark County submits the attached annual monitoring 

network plan. Should you have any questions, please contact Phillip Wiker, Monitoring 

Manager at (702) 455-1603. 

Sincerely, 

Yousaf Hameed

Air Quality Monitoring Supervisor

Clark County 

Department of Air Quality 

4701 W. Russell Rd. Suite 200 

Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 

Direct: (702) 455-1664 

Email: Hameed@ClarkCountyNV.gov<mailto:Hameed@ClarkCountyNV.gov>

ATTACHMENT FILENAME TYPE SIZE

messageBody.htm Hypertext Markup 

Language File 

3.79 KB 

Clark County Air Quality Annual 

Network Plan.pdf

Adobe Acrobat 

Document 51.05 MB 

All Save Checked Files 

This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This confidentiality is not 

waived or lost if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/received in error. Any unauthorized use, 

alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this email is prohibited. It may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality if it relates to 

health service matters. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this email in error, you are asked to immediately notify 

the sender by telephone or by return email. You should also delete this email and destroy any hard copies produced. 

If you have any questions about this delivery please contact the Clark County IT Service Desk at ithds@ClarkCountyNV.gov or 702.455.3282. 

Secure Mailbox - View Message Page 1 of 1

https://ccentmail1m.co.clark.nv.us/messenger/def/tw_purl/NonUserPurl.do?x=d-6071931-c... 6/3/2014
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Michael B. Wheeler, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Tufco Technologies, Inc.,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tufco Technologies, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 14, 2005   /s/  Michael B. Wheeler    Michael B. Wheeler  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
17
§ 150.5 Joint Public Safety Awards Board. ( a ) A Joint Public Safety Awards Board (Joint Board) is hereby established to fulfill the responsibilities of the Administrator of FEMA and the Attorney General by administering the process of nomination for the President's Award and by participating in the selection process with the Executive Office of the President. The Joint Board shall consist of ten representatives who are Federal employees and are of appropriate rank (at or equivalent to grades GM-14 or above). Five persons shall be named by and represent the Administrator of FEMA, and five persons shall be named by and represent the Attorney General. The representatives serving on the Joint Board shall select one of their number to act as the chairperson.
( b ) Representatives on the Joint Board shall serve in addition to their regular duties and without additional compensation. Consistent with the requirements of this part, the members of the Joint Board shall establish the procedures by which the selections for the President's Award shall be made to assure the timely presentation of these awards.
( c ) A National Emergency Training Center employee shall act as Executive Secretary of the Joint Board. The Executive Secretary shall perform such functions as are appropriate to the Board's responsibilities, including the receipt of all nominations and the communication of nomination information, for the purpose of receiving comments thereon, from members of the public safety community pursuant to § 150.5(e). The Executive Secretary shall be appointed by the Associate Director, Training and Fire Programs of FEMA.
( d ) The Joint Board shall review the nominations for the President's Award and shall recommend to the Administrator , FEMA, and the Attorney General by February 1 of each year, those nominees determined by it to merit consideration for the President's Award together with reasons therefor. The Administrator and the Attorney General shall then recommend to the President those nominees determined by them to merit the President's Award, together with the reasons therefor. Recommendations for 1983 shall be submitted on or before March 29, 1985.
( e ) The Joint Board may request that persons representing a cross-section of the national public safety community comment upon nominations made to the Board for the President's Award. Both the request for comments and the comments themselves shall be made in writing.
[49 FR 39845, Oct. 11, 1984, as amended at 50 FR 3350, Jan. 24, 1985]
#### Edith B. Gallagher, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of Frank Pagliaro, Jr., and Another, Infants, v. Frank J. Pagliaro.

Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 278 App. Div. 898.]
#### § 327.1 Purpose.

This part establishes policy on the use by private industry of Government-owned industrial plant equipment. This policy is necessary to maintain a highly effective and immediately available reserve of such equipment for the emergency preparedness programs of the U.S. Government.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 593 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 593

  To restrict the imposition by the Secretary of Homeland Security of 
   fines, penalties, duties, or tariffs applicable only to coastwise 
  voyages, or prohibit otherwise qualified non-United States citizens 
  from serving as crew, on specified vessels transporting passengers 
 between the State of Washington and the State of Alaska, to address a 
Canadian cruise ship ban and the extraordinary impacts of the COVID-19 
        pandemic on Alaskan communities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 4, 2021

 Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Sullivan) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To restrict the imposition by the Secretary of Homeland Security of 
   fines, penalties, duties, or tariffs applicable only to coastwise 
  voyages, or prohibit otherwise qualified non-United States citizens 
  from serving as crew, on specified vessels transporting passengers 
 between the State of Washington and the State of Alaska, to address a 
Canadian cruise ship ban and the extraordinary impacts of the COVID-19 
        pandemic on Alaskan communities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alaska Tourism Recovery Act''.

SEC. 2. VOYAGE DEEMED TO BE FOREIGN.

    (a) Criteria.--A roundtrip voyage transporting passengers between a 
port or place in the State of Alaska and a port or place in the State 
of Washington is deemed a foreign voyage for purposes of the law of the 
United States, if the voyage--
            (1) is made by a passenger vessel to which sections 3507 
        and 3508 of title 46, United State Code, apply; and
            (2) occurs during the period described in subsection (b).
    (b) Duration of Applicability.--A voyage deemed to be a foreign 
voyage under subsection (a) is a voyage which begins not later than any 
date prior to February 28, 2022, on which the Government of Canada or 
its political subdivisions, or any port or province in Canada, 
prohibits a passenger vessel to which sections 3507 and 3508 of title 
46, United State Code, apply from entering, berthing, or docking in 
Canadian waters of the Pacific Coast due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
                                 <all>
```
### **CHAPTER 17B—IMPOUNDMENT CONTROL**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.
681.
Disclaimer.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—CONGRESSIONAL CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED RESCISSIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND DEFERRALS OF BUDGET AUTHORITY

682.
Definitions.
683.
Rescission of budget authority.
684.
Proposed deferrals of budget authority.
685.
Transmission of messages; publication.
686.
Reports by Comptroller General.
687.
Suits by Comptroller General.
688.
Procedure in House of Representatives and Senate.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—LINE ITEM VETO

691 to 692. Omitted.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-63 June 25, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT CLINTON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois, have

announced the assignment of Troy Pruett as the agency's Senior

Resident Inspector at the Clinton nuclear power plant, located

near Clinton, Illinois.

Pruett joined the NRC in 1992 as a health physics materials

inspector at the Region V Office in California. Most recently,

he had been a resident inspector at the Waterford plant in

Louisiana. Prior to joining the NRC, he worked for

Indiana/Michigan Power Company as an instructor at the D.C. Cook

nuclear plant in Michigan. Also, for eight years he was an

engineering laboratory technician and a machinist for the U.S.

Navy. He received a Bachelor of Science in Human Resources

Management from the New School For Social Research. Pruett and

his wife, son, and daughter plan to reside in Bloomington,

Illinois.

Pruett joins NRC Resident Inspector Karla Stoedter at Clinton.

They can be reached at 217/935-9521.

####