alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23327]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1558-DR]


West Virginia; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-1558-DR), dated September 20, 
2004, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective October 8, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of West Virginia is hereby amended to include the 
following area among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President 
in his declaration of September 20, 2004:

    Boone County for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-23327 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-10464

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jazavian Palmer, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:20-CR-151-3

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jazavian Palmer has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Palmer has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 10, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-10464 Document: 00516088510 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/10/2021
No. 21-10464

2

relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Palmer’s 

response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2.

Case: 21-10464 Document: 00516088510 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/10/2021
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diametrics Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Bruce Comer III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ W. Bruce Comer IIIW. Bruce Comer IIIChief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2006


A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23514]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Association of Records Managers and 
Administrators

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Association of Records 
Managers and Administrators (``ARMA International'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Association 
of Records Managers and Administrators, Lenexa, KS. The nature and 
scope of ARMA International's standards development activities are: 
standards and best practices for the implementation of policies, 
systems and procedures that manage recorded information in a variety of 
formats throughout the life cycle. These standards promote efficiency 
and cost savings by reducing wasted effort, ensuring consistency of 
procedures over time and reducing risk exposure.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23514 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```
Dismiss and Opinion Filed October 16, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-23-00580-CV

VARUGHESE P. JOHN D/B/A/ AMERICAN HOMEBUILDERS OF 

TEXAS, Appellant

V.

JAYANTHA K. NANAYAKKARA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-05041

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Goldstein, Garcia, and Miskel

Opinion by Justice Miskel

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the 

motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

230580f.p05

/Emily Miskel/

EMILY MISKEL

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

VARUGHESE P. JOHN D/B/A/ 

AMERICAN HOMEBUILDERS OF 

TEXAS, Appellant

No. 05-23-00580-CV V.

JAYANTHA K. NANAYAKKARA, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-05041.

Opinion delivered by Justice Miskel. 

Justices Goldstein and Garcia 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee JAYANTHA K. NANAYAKKARA recover 

his costs of this appeal from appellant VARUGHESE P. JOHN D/B/A/ AMERICAN 

HOMEBUILDERS OF TEXAS.

Judgment entered this 16th day of October, 2023.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        1498
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       1442
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         1498
<EQUITIES>                                   178
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              1691
<CASH>                                        43
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                            13
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                        58
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2602
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             1231
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          395
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          5
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2602
<PREMIUMS>                                   635
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                           75
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            27
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 5
<BENEFITS>                                   488
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  123
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                          54
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               77
<INCOME-TAX>                                  15
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           62
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  62
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               1.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                               1.77
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              1239
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                          526
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            (38)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                           273
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             224
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             1231
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        1
        





</TABLE>
**Record of Ex Parte Contacts**

Docket No. 

### FAA - 2012 - 0102 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2012 - NM - 004 - AD **With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?**  (Yo u might need to submit a separate record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “ **Ex Parte Contacts** .”) ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE

Other/Additional Information:
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 115

**Question 115:**The words, "e.g., containment or ventilation," have been added to 10 CFR 20.1701. Does this mean that increased emphasis is being placed on glove bags to do valve replacements, repacks, etc. at nuclear power plants?

**Answer:** No. These words were added simply to provide examples of "process or other engineering controls." 

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1701)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017
#### Marco Antonio JIMENEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-16878.

D.C. No. CV-98-01945-EHC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Marco Antonio' Jimenez appeals the district court’s order striking the “First Amended Complaint” he submitted seven months after entry of judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, *see Maljack Prods., Inc. v. GoodTimes Home Video Corp.,*81 F.3d 881, 888 (9th Cir.1996), and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed August 1, 2001.

*667Jimenez’s remaining contentions are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 97-64 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson October 27, 1997

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

E-MAIL: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC,TU ELECTRIC TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

AT COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a

predecisional enforcement conference Friday, October 31, with

officials of TU Electric, operators of the Comanche Peak nuclear

power plant near Glen Rose, Texas, to discuss four apparent

violations of NRC requirements.

The conference will begin at 8:30 a.m. at NRC Region IV

offices in Arlington, Texas. The meeting will be open to public

observation; NRC officials will be available afterward for

questions.

The apparent violations arose from changes made by TU

Electric to the emergency plan for Comanche Peak. Changes in the

emergency plan were reviewed by the NRC during an inspection

September 22-25 of this year. The inspectors identified four

areas in which the new plan apparently did not meet NRC

requirements. These were: the failure to describe the emergency

response organization, the failure to describe the emergency

response organization training program, reduction of on-shift

staffing and timely augmentation capabilities, and the failure to

list local officials who would make decisions on evacuation,

sheltering, or other protective actions in the area 10-50 miles

from the plant in the event of an accident.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference

does not mean that NRC has made a final determination that

violations did occur or that enforcement action, such as a

monetary fine, will be taken. The purpose of the meeting is to

discuss the apparent violations, their causes and safety

significance, and to provide TU Electric officials with an

opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in

the NRC inspection report and present corrective actions that

have been taken.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated
enforcement action will be made at this conference. Those

decisions will be made by senior NRC officials at a later time.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23510]



[[Page 61867]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Caterpillar Inc.: Consortium To Develop 
Positioning System for Machine Information System

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 12, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Caterpillar Inc.: 
Consortium to Develop Positioning System for Machine Information System 
(``CAT'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and 
objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: Caterpillar Inc., Mossville, IL; and Applanix 
Corporation, Richmond Hill, Ontario, CANADA. The general areas of CAT's 
planned activities are to investigate methods to compensate for 
satellite shading that cause Caterpillar's information-based products 
such as CAES to cease giving useful positioning data. The activities of 
this Consortium will be partially funded by an award from the 
Department of Energy/National Energy Technology Laboratory.

Dorothy F. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23510 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### §1515. Exercise of rulemaking powers

The provisions of sections 658 to 658g and 1514 of this title are enacted by Congress—

(1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the Senate and the House of Representatives, respectively, and as such they shall be considered as part of the rules of such House, respectively, and such rules shall supersede other rules only to the extent that they are inconsistent therewith; and

(2) with full recognition of the constitutional right of either House to change such rules (so far as relating to such House) at any time, in the same manner, and to the same extent as in the case of any other rule of each House.

(Pub. L. 104–4, title I, §108, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 63.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, or on the date 90 days after appropriations are made available as authorized under section 1516 of this title, whichever is earlier, and applicable to legislation considered on and after such date, see section 110 of Pub. L. 104–4, set out as a note under section 1511 of this title.
### §130c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 130c was editorially reclassified as section 4593 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 199 (Friday, October 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23175]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Addition to procurement list.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List a product to be 
furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 14, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3259.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sheryl D. Kennerly, (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 18, 2004, the Committee for Purchase 
From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notice (69 FR 
34121) of proposed additions to the Procurement List. After 
consideration of the material presented to it concerning capability of 
qualified nonprofit agencies to provide the product and impact of the 
addition on the current or most recent contractors, the Committee has 
determined that the product listed below is suitable for procurement by 
the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 46-48c and 41 CFR 51-2.4.

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification

    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the product to the 
Government.
    2. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the product to the Government.
    3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the product proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.

End of Certification

    Accordingly, the following product is added to the Procurement 
List:

Product:

Product/NSN: One Step Tub & Shower Cleaner, M.R. 584.
NPA: Winston-Salem Industries for the Blind, Winston-Salem, North 
Carolina.
Contract Activity: Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA), Fort Lee, 
Virginia.

    This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the 
effective date of this addition or options that may be exercised under 
those contracts.

Patrick Rowe,
Deputy Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 04-23175 Filed 10-14-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
#### Laura Meehan et al., Respondents, v. Harry Engel et al., Defendants, and Emanuel Stern, Defendant-Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 451

**Question 451:** May the codes "ND" (not detectable), "NR" (not required), and "NC" (not calculated) be used more generally in the radiation dose data blocks on the NRC Forms 4 and 5 than is implied by the instructions on the forms? The purpose in asking this question is to clarify the guidance for filling out the forms provided in the regulatory position and in the instructions on the reverse side of the NRC Forms 4 and 5. The Form 5 instructions appear to limit the use of the "NR" and "NC" codes to the committed effective dose equivalent (CEDE) and the committed dose equivalent (CDE), "ND" is not referenced in the Form 5 instructions, and the NRC Form 4 instructions do not appear to refer to any of these codes. We believe that the references to the codes in the guidance and instructions on the forms are as examples for emphasis, and that the intent of the guidance is that "NR" and "ND" are appropriate for use, as applicable, in any of the dose blocks, and are not specifically limited for use by the manner in which referenced or described in the guidance. However, we do note that "NC" may only be applicable to the CDE (e.g., if the CEDE were less than 1 rem).

**Answer:** Yes. As indicated in the second paragraph of regulatory position 1.1 of the guide, "NR" should be entered in the blocks on Forms 4 and 5 to indicate the areas for which monitoring was not required and "ND" should be entered on these forms to indicate "where monitoring was provided but not measurable [detectable]". As indicated in regulatory position 2.2 of the guide, the use of "NC" is appropriate only for items 16 and 18 on NRC Forms 4 and 5 for cases in which the CEDE does not exceed 1 rem and there are no overexposures in any dose category within the monitoring year.

(References: Regulatory Guide 8.7, Rev. 1; 10 CFR 20.2104, 10 CFR 20.2106)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-134 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, September 16, 1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a

meeting on October 1 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will

begin at 10:30 a.m. in Room T-2B1, of the NRC's Two White Flint

North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. The Subcommittee on

Planning and Procedures will discuss proposed ACRS activities and

the qualifications of candidates for appointment to ACRS. Some

portions of the meeting dealing with internal personnel rules and

practices of ACRS, may be closed to public attendance.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, will be described in a Notice of Meeting

published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

#
### SUBCHAPTER II—JURISDICTION, ADMINISTRATION, ENFORCEMENT; JOINT PENSION TASK FORCE, ETC.
### §111a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 111a was editorially reclassified as section 6625 of this title.