alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsGaAs monolithic RF modules for SARSAT distress beaconsMonolithic GaAs UHF components for use in SARSAT Emergency Distress beacons are under development by Microwave Monolithics, Inc., Simi Valley, CA. The components include a bi-phase modulator, driver amplifier, and a 5 watt power amplifier.Document ID19910011871Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsCauley, Michael A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1991Subject CategorySpace Communications, Spacecraft Communications, Command And TrackingReport/Patent NumberE-6107NAS 1.15:104338NASA-TM-104338Meeting InformationMeeting: International Symposium on Optical Engineering and Photonics in Aerospace SensingLocation: Orlando, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: April 1, 1991End Date: April 5, 1991Sponsors:Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation EngineersAccession Number91N21184Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 342-02-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910011871.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-14 February 16, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The NRC staff will meet with Northeast Utilities officials on Wednesday, February 17, to

discuss the results of the NRC’s corrective action inspection at Millstone Unit 2.

The meeting, which begins at 1 p.m., will be held at the Leland F. Sillin Training Center

at the Millstone site. The meeting is open to public observation.

The objective of the inspection, known as the 40500 inspection, is to evaluate the

effectiveness of licensee controls in identifying, resolving and preventing issues that degrade

the quality of plant operations or safety.

#
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22972]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 
1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, 
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 9, 2004 and September 2, 2004, the 
National Science Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register 
of a permit application received. Permits were issued on October 5, 
2004 to:
    Scott Borg--Permit No. 2005-011.
    Bruce C. Sidell--Permit No. 2005-015.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-22972 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. (Historicalpurposes)
**Title:****Annual report FY...**
 
2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc:D 1.27:AF 3/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000635177
 
October 31, 2017
-cr-06219-WDF Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2000 P
-cr-06219-WDF Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2000 P
-cr-06219-WDF Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2000 P
-cr-06219-WDF Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2000 P
-cr-06219-WDF Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2000 P
§ 206.12 Use and coordination of relief organizations. ( a ) In providing relief and assistance under the Stafford Act, the FCO or Regional Administrator may utilize, with their consent, the personnel and facilities of the American National Red Cross, the Salvation Army, the Mennonite Disaster Service, and other voluntary organizations in the distribution of medicine, food, supplies, or other items, and in the restoration, rehabilitation, or reconstruction of community services and essential facilities, whenever the FCO or Regional Administrator finds that such utilization is necessary.
( b ) The Administrator is authorized to enter into agreements with the American Red Cross, The Salvation Army, the Mennonite Disaster Service, and other voluntary organizations engaged in providing relief during and after a major disaster or emergency. Any agreement shall include provisions assuring that use of Federal facilities, supplies, and services will be in compliance with § 206.11, Nondiscrimination in Disaster Assistance, and § 206.191, Duplication of Benefits, of these regulations and such other regulations as the Administrator may issue. The FCO may coordinate the disaster relief activities of the voluntary organizations which agree to operate under his/her direction.
( c ) Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to limit or in any way affect the responsibilities of the American National Red Cross as stated in Public Law 58-4.
### §1905a. Reimbursement for salaries paid for service at Federal Law Enforcement Training Center

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Chief of the Capitol Police is authorized to receive moneys from the Department of the Treasury as reimbursements for salaries paid by the Capitol Police in connection with certain officers and members of the United States Capitol Police serving as instructors at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. Moneys so received shall be deposited in the Treasury of the United States as miscellaneous receipts.

(Pub. L. 95–26, title I, §111, May 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 87; Pub. L. 108–7, div. H, title I, §1018(h)(3), Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 369.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 64–3 of this title.

Section is from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1977.

#### Amendments

2003—Pub. L. 108–7 substituted "Chief of the Capitol Police" for "Secretary of the Senate" and "the Capitol Police" for "the United States Senate".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2003 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 108–7 effective Feb. 20, 2003, and applicable to fiscal year 2003 and each fiscal year thereafter, see section 1907(i) of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center of the Department of the Treasury to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 203(4), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
Contacts. With whom outside the FAA hasthis proposal beendiscussed? Organization Person Contacted Date Response ,,"ational Business Aircrafl Assoeiation Eli Cotti 

# 1/4/ 01 

# - Regional Airline Association Dave Lotter~r 

# /1/6/01 - I Aircraft Owners &Pilots Associ<ltion Robert Hackman 

# db/o4 I ATA Craig Fabian 

# !1/iJriL -
§ 6.53 Denial of requests to amend records. ( a ) If the system manager determines that an amendment of a record is improper or that the record should be amended in a manner other than that requested by an individual, he shall refer the request to amend and his determinations and recommendations to the appropriate official listed in § 6.33(b) through normal supervisory channels.
( b ) If the official listed in § 6.33, after reviewing the request to amend a record, determines to amend the record in accordance with the request, said official promptly shall return the request to the system manager with instructions to make the requested amendments in accordance with § 6.52.
( c ) If the appropriate official listed in § 6.33, after reviewing the request to amend a record, determines not to amend the record in accordance with the request, the requestor shall be promptly advised in writing of the determination. The refusal letter ( 1 ) shall state the reasons for the denial of the request to amend;
( 2 ) shall include proposed alternative amendments, if appropriate;
( 3 ) shall state the requestor's right to appeal the denial of the request to amend; and
( 4 ) shall state the procedures for appealing and the name and title of the official to whom the appeal is to be addressed.
( d ) The appropriate official listed in § 6.33 shall furnish the Privacy Appeals Officer a copy of each initial denial of a request to amend a record.
[44 FR 50293, Aug. 27, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 17152, Mar. 18, 1980]
### **CHAPTER 21—CIVIC ACHIEVEMENT AWARD PROGRAM IN HONOR OF OFFICE OF SPEAKER OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES**
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 97-28 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson April 14, 1997

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

NRC, NPPD TO MEET FOR DISCUSSION ON

POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS AT COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a predecisional enforcement

conference on Tuesday, April 15, with officials of Nebraska Public Power District, the operator of

Cooper Nuclear Station, a nuclear power plant near Brownville, Nebraska. The parties will

discuss two apparent violations of NRC requirements.

The conference will begin at 10:30 a.m. at NRC Region IV offices in Arlington, Texas. The

meeting will be open to public observation; NRC officials will be available afterwards for

questions.

The apparent violations were identified during inspections conducted December 1 to

January 11, and October 7 to February 19 of this year. The first apparent violation is for failing on

three occasions to adequately evaluate the safety of changes to the plant's equipment

configuration as described in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR). The UFSAR

describes all the plant's safety systems and NRC regulations require an evaluation anytime

changes are made that affect these systems.

The second apparent violation, identified in the second inspection, arises from failure to

update the UFSAR after changes to safety equipment were made.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that NRC

has made a final determination that violations did occur or that enforcement action, such as a

monetary fine, will be taken. The purpose is to discuss the apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance, and to provide NPPD officials an opportunity to point out any errors that may

have been made in the NRC inspection report and present corrective actions that have been

taken.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a

civil penalty, will be made at this conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC

officials at a later time.
#### § 400.213 Termination of obligations.

The Board shall have such rights to terminate the Guarantee as are set forth in the Guarantee.

[65 FR 70294, Nov. 22, 2000]
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.234 Certificate of Origin. A Certificate of Origin as specified in § 10.236 must be employed to certify that an article described in § 10.233(a)(1) through (5) being exported from a CBTPA beneficiary country to the United States qualifies for the preferential tariff treatment referred to in § 10.231. The Certificate of Origin must be prepared by the exporter in the CBTPA beneficiary country. Where the CBTPA beneficiary country exporter is not the producer of the article, that exporter may complete and sign a Certificate of Origin on the basis of: ( a ) Its reasonable reliance on the producer's written representation that the article qualifies for preferential tariff treatment; or
( b ) A completed and signed Certificate of Origin for the article voluntarily provided to the exporter by the producer.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.787 Goods re-entered after repair or alteration in Morocco. ( a ) *General.* This section sets forth the rules that apply for purposes of obtaining duty-free treatment on goods returned after repair or alteration in Morocco as provided for in subheadings 9802.00.40 and 9802.00.50, HTSUS. Goods returned after having been repaired or altered in Morocco, whether or not pursuant to a warranty, are eligible for duty-free treatment, provided that the requirements of this section are met. For purposes of this section, “repairs or alterations” means restoration, addition, renovation, re-dyeing, cleaning, re-sterilizing, or other treatment which does not destroy the essential characteristics of, or create a new or commercially different good from, the good exported from the United States.
( b ) *Goods not eligible for treatment.* The duty-free treatment referred to in paragraph (a) of this section will not apply to goods which, in their condition as exported from the United States to Morocco, are incomplete for their intended use and for which the processing operation performed in Morocco constitutes an operation that is performed as a matter of course in the preparation or manufacture of finished goods.
( c ) *Documentation.* The provisions of § 10.8(a), (b), and (c) of this part, relating to the documentary requirements for goods entered under subheading 9802.00.40 or 9802.00.50, HTSUS, will apply in connection with the entry of goods which are returned from Morocco after having been exported for repairs or alterations and which are claimed to be duty free.
[CBP Dec. 07-51, 72 FR 35651, June 29, 2007. Redesignated at CBP Dec. 08-29, 73 FR 45354, Aug. 5, 2008]
### [§1293. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–189, §3, Aug. 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 417]

Section, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 929; Mar. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–3, §14(b), 73 Stat. 10, provided for appeal from supreme court of Puerto Rico to court of appeals for first circuit. See section 1258 of this title.

A subsequent section 1293, added Pub. L. 95–598, title II, §236(a), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2667, which related to bankruptcy appeals, did not become effective pursuant to section 402(b) of Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.
### §1398. Withdrawal not to occur because of change in business form or suspension of contributions during labor dispute

Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, an employer shall not be considered to have withdrawn from a plan solely because—

(1) an employer ceases to exist by reason of—

(A) a change in corporate structure described in section 1369(b) of this title, or

(B) a change to an unincorporated form of business enterprise,

if the change causes no interruption in employer contributions or obligations to contribute under the plan, or

(2) an employer suspends contributions under the plan during a labor dispute involving its employees.

For purposes of this part, a successor or parent corporation or other entity resulting from any such change shall be considered the original employer.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title IV, §4218, as added Pub. L. 96–364, title I, §104(2), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1236; amended Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1879(u)(4), as added Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7862(b)(1)(C), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2432; Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7893(f), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2447.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1989—Par. (1)(A). Pub. L. 101–239, §7893(f), made identical amendment to that of Pub. L. 99–514, §1879(u)(4), as added by Pub. L. 101–239, §7862(b)(1)(C), see below.

Pub. L. 101–239, §7862(b)(1)(C), added Pub. L. 99–514, §1879(u)(4), see 1986 Amendment note below.

1986—Par. (1)(A). Pub. L. 99–514, §1879(u)(4), as added by Pub. L. 101–239, §7862(b)(1)(C), substituted "section 1369(b) of this title" for "section 1362(d) of this title".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1989 Amendment

Amendment by section 7862(b)(1)(C) of Pub. L. 101–239 effective as if included in the provision of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99–514, to which such amendment relates, see section 7863 of Pub. L. 101–239, set out as a note under section 106 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

Amendment by section 7893(f) of Pub. L. 101–239 effective as if included in the provision of the Single-Employer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99–272, title XI, to which such amendment relates, see section 7893(h) of Pub. L. 101–239, set out as a note under section 1002 of this title.

#### Plan Amendments Not Required Until January 1, 1989

For provisions directing that if any amendments made by subtitle A or subtitle C of title XI [§§1101–1147 and 1171–1177] or title XVIII [§§1800–1899A] of Pub. L. 99–514 require an amendment to any plan, such plan amendment shall not be required to be made before the first plan year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 1989, see section 1140 of Pub. L. 99–514, as amended, set out as a note under section 401 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Exhibit 10.8


 








FIRST AMENDED POST - CLOSfNG AGREEMENT THIS FIRST AMENDED POST - CLOSING AGREEMENT is entered into December 20,  2020 and  effective I8 th  day  of  June,  2019,  by  and  between Mid  Penn  Bank  in  its  own  right  and  as  Secured  Creditor  on  behalf  of  Yuengling Ice  Cream  Corp  (the "Seller/Bank"),  YIC  Acquisitions  Corp., a Nevada business corporation, (the "Purchaser") and David Yuengling and Robert C.  Bohorad (the "Guarantors"). WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a Secured Creditor Asset Sale and Purchase Agreement and a PA UCC Article 9 Default, Foreclosure and Private Sale Agreement dated June 18 , 2019 (collectively "Agreement of Sale") ; and WHEREAS, Purchaser was to transfer $ 50 , 000 . 00 to account # 19046960 at Mid Penn Bank, as security pursuant to the Agreement of Sale and the Security Agreement of even date hereof ; and WHEREAS, the  as of closing the $50,000.00 was not available; and WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed the $ 50 , 000 . 00 is not and shall not be a condition of closing and can be delivered any time up to March 31 , 2021 . NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the forgoing and of the mutual covenants, promises and agreements herein contained, and other valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows : 1. Recitals. The  above Recitals  are  incorporated  into  this Post - Closing  Agreement by  reference  as if fully set forth. 2. Agreement of Parties. $50,000.00. a. Purchaser  agrees  to  fund  the $50,000.00 to account # 19046960 at Mid Penn Bank on or before March 31 , 2021 . Should Purchaser fail to fund said account within the time set forth, Seller shall have the option to call the Loan, as defined in the Assumption Agreement, in default and exercise its rights thereunder . c . On or before March 31 , 2021 Purchaser shall pay to Bank all costs and attorney's fees incurred by the Bank in this transaction . As of July 27 , 2020 the attorney fees and costs incurred are $ 8 , 700 . 00 . 3. Entire Agreement . This First Amended Post - Closing Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Parties related to the matters contained and the terms of this First Amended Post - Closing Agreement are contractual and not merely a recital . 4. Pennsylvania Law . This Post - Closing Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania .
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.777 Imported directly. ( a ) *General.* To qualify as an originating good under the MFTA, a good must be imported directly from the territory of a Party into the territory of the other Party. For purposes of this subpart, the words “imported directly” mean: ( 1 ) Direct shipment from the territory of a Party into the territory of the other Party without passing through the territory of a non-Party; or
( 2 ) If the shipment passed through the territory of a non-Party, the good, upon arrival in the territory of a Party, will be considered to be “imported directly” only if the good did not undergo production, manufacturing, or any other operation outside the territories of the Parties, other than unloading, reloading, or any other operation necessary to preserve the good in good condition or to transport the good to the territory of a Party. Operations that may be performed outside the territories of the Parties include inspection, removal of dust that accumulates during shipment, ventilation, spreading out or drying, chilling, replacing salt, sulfur dioxide, or aqueous solutions, replacing damaged packing materials and containers, and removal of units of the good that are spoiled or damaged and present a danger to the remaining units of the good, or to transport the good to the territory of a Party.
( b ) *Documentary evidence.* An importer making a claim for preferential tariff treatment under the MFTA for an originating good may be required to demonstrate, to CBP's satisfaction, that the good was “imported directly” from the territory of a Party into the territory of the other Party, as that term is defined in paragraph (a) of this section. An importer may demonstrate compliance with this section by submitting documentary evidence. Such evidence may include, but is not limited to, bills of lading, airway bills, packing lists, commercial invoices, receiving and inventory records, and customs entry and exit documents.
### §1714. Protection against discrimination based on geographic location

The court may not approve a proposed settlement that provides for the payment of greater sums to some class members than to others solely on the basis that the class members to whom the greater sums are to be paid are located in closer geographic proximity to the court.

(Added Pub. L. 109–2, §3(a), Feb. 18, 2005, 119 Stat. 7.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to any civil action commenced on or after Feb. 18, 2005, see section 9 of Pub. L. 109–2, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 1332 of this title.