alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ^„, .. . .. _ . _ ^ 

m AUG 2 3 P 2: 2M OFFICE OF HEARINGS V^ ^ '::: L^ C Tl / 5 - f 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

: AiKLl? 2010 

In the Matter of Cenogenics Corporation HEAR^^'G DOCKET 

2009EA700392 , ^ , 

Judge Not Assigned |C^lO eRC^Oli'T |ffP^,,5_o/0 -675<-

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby notifies the United States 

Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, and the Respondent, pursuant to 14 

C.F.R. §13.204(b),that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the following 

attorney: 

Jeanine C, Gotimer 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718 553-3272 

Facsimile: 718 995-5699 

All communications, notices, pleadings or documents are respectfully requested to be 

forwarded as follows: 

Jeanine C. Gotimer 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 
Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718 553-3272 

Facsimile: 718 995-5699 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfired R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By: A f V >A^^ i ^.vou. Dated:_^:MJLli A 

JcMiine C. Gotimer 

Attorney 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this day copies of the foregoing Notice of Appearance were placed 

in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested 

addressed as follows: 

Michael Katz, President 

Cenogenics Corp. 

100 Route 520, Drawer 308 

Morganville,NJ 07751 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014 

AUG ] ] 20)0 ^ P 

Marianna Perero 

Paralegal Specialist 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# TIME AND DATE:

9:30 a.m., Tuesday, October 26, 2004.

# PLACE:

NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594.

# STATUS:

The one item is open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

7439B, Aircraft Accident Report—In-Flight Separation of Vertical Stabilizer, American Airlines Flight 587, Airbus Industrie A300-605R, N14053, Belle Harbor, New York, November 12, 2001.

# NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:

Telephone: (202) 314-6100.

Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Ms. Carolyn Dargan at (202) 314-63-05 by Friday, October 22, 2004.

                        The public may view the meeting via a live or archived Webcast by accessing a link under “News & Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *http://www.ntsb.gov.*

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

Dated: October 15, 2004.

Vicky D'Onofrio,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-23494 Filed 10-15-04; 3:07 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
July 30, 2012

Mr. Kevin Adams Industry Economist US Department ofTransportation Dear Mr. Adams: 2811A 

## L;\J'rport Blvd. 

### South Meridian, MS 39307 

### p. 601.482.0364 f. 601.482.5899**!_YWW.m~ridianairport.com** 

### www.meridianaviation.aero

First I want to thank Silver Airways for revising the proposed flight schedule to Meridian under their EAS proposal. This schedule will meet the needs of the majority of our passengers. I have discussed this revision with the Airport Authority and Mayor and feel this will provide the best air service Meridian can hope for in the current environment. Thank you for your help through this process. Sincerely,**~** 

## /**>~ u-£~/ur_____** 

# / Tom Williams President

Aircraft Maintenance & Parts
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-22607-CIV-ALTMAN/Goodman

EDUARDO FLORES, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GATEWAY AIRPORT CONCESSIONS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

On August 26, 2020, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Approve Settlement [ECF No. 18]

(the “Motion”). On September 10, 2020, U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman issued a Report 

and Recommendation [ECF No. 23] (the “R&R”), recommending that this Court (1) “find that the 

parties’ settlement agreement is fair and reasonable,” (2) “approve the settlement,” and (3) 

“dismiss this action with prejudice.” See R&R at 3 (emphasis omitted). In his R&R, Judge 

Goodman also warned the parties that they “shall have two calendar days from the date of this 

report to file written objections.” Id. (emphasis omitted). No party has objected, and the time to do 

so has passed. 

When a magistrate judge’s “disposition” has been properly objected to, district courts must 

review that disposition de novo. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). But when no party has timely objected, 

“the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to 

accept the recommendation.” FED. R. CIV. P. 72 advisory committee’s notes (citation omitted).

Although Rule 72 itself is silent on the standard of review, the Supreme Court has acknowledged 

that Congress’s intent was to require de novo review only when objections have been properly 

filed—and not when neither party objects. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“It does 

Case 1:20-cv-22607-RKA Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate [judge]’s factual 

or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those 

findings.”). In any event, the “[f]ailure to object to the magistrate [judge]’s factual findings after 

notice precludes a later attack on these findings.” Lewis v. Smith, 855 F.2d 736, 738 (11th Cir. 

1988) (citing Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 410 (5th Cir. 1982)). 

The Court has reviewed the R&R, the Complaint, the record, and the applicable law and 

finds no clear error in the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby 

ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows:

1. The R&R [ECF No. 23] is ADOPTED.

2. The Motion [ECF No. 18] is GRANTED.

3. The Settlement Agreement [ECF No. 18-1] is APPROVED.

4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and 

fees, except as otherwise agreed.

5. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. Any pending deadlines and hearings 

are TERMINATED.

6. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 29th day of September 2020.

 _________________________________

 ROY K. ALTMAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record 

Case 1:20-cv-22607-RKA Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2020 Page 2 of 2
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-47 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Tuesday, September 14, 1999)

NRC MONITORS HURRICANE FLOYD

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is monitoring storm preparations at

several nuclear plants in the southeast as Hurricane Floyd approaches the Atlantic

coast.

NRC Region II has staffed its Incident Response Center in Atlanta and is currently

assessing whether additional inspectors may be sent to join resident inspectors

already assigned to the sites.

The current projected path of the storm takes it to the northwest, with the center of

the storm possibly making landfall along the Georgia or South Carolina coast. In

general, safety procedures require nuclear plants to begin shutting down should

winds be projected to reach 73 miles per hour. Other preparations include securing

loose equipment and making sure adequate supplies and personnel are available.

The plants that may be directly affected by Hurricane Floyd include St Lucie in

Florida, Hatch in Georgia, Robinson in South Carolina and Brunswick in North

Carolina, but due to the unpredictable nature of hurricanes, other plants farther

inland are also tracking the storm and preparing for possible weather-related

problems.

The safe operation of nuclear plants during any event, including hurricanes, remains

the responsibility of the company licensed to operate the plant. The NRC's role is

to monitor events for compliance with safety procedures and advise the operator if

necessary.

###
EX-10.2





 Exhibit 10.2 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT 

This First Amendment to the Shareholder Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of April 5, 2021 by and
between Corning Incorporated, a New York corporation (the “Company”), and Samsung Display Co., Ltd., a company organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the “Shareholder”). Capitalized terms used but not
defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement (as defined below). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Shareholder are
parties to that certain Shareholder Agreement, dated as of October 22, 2013 (the “Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to
Section 8.6 of the Agreement, the Agreement may be amended in a writing signed by the Company and the Shareholder; and 
 WHEREAS, the
Company and the Shareholder desire to amend the Agreement as set forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the
parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	 Amendment to the Agreement. The definition of “Ownership Cap” set forth in
Section 1.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 


 “Ownership
Cap” means a Total Ownership Percentage of fifteen percent (15%). 
  

	2.	 Miscellaneous. 



(a)    Modification; Full Force and Effect. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement and the
terms thereof remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 
 (b)    Miscellaneous Terms. Sections 8.1 through
8.13 of the Agreement shall apply to this Amendment mutatis mutandis as if set forth herein. 
 [Signature Page Follows] 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Amendment to be signed by their
respective duly authorized officers as of the date first written above. 
  

					
	CORNING INCORPORATED
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Lawrence D. McRae

		 	Name:	 	Lawrence D. McRae
		 	Title:	 	Vice Chairman & Corporate Development Officer


 [Signature Page to First Amendment to Shareholder Agreement] 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Amendment to be signed by their
respective duly authorized officers as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Joo Sun Choi

	Name:	 	Joo Sun Choi
	Title:	 	Corporate President, CEO


 [Signature Page to First Amendment to Shareholder Agreement]
#### § 6.52 Approval of requests to amend records.

If the system manager determines that amendment of a record is proper in accordance with the request to amend, he or she promptly shall make the necessary corrections to the record and shall send a copy of the corrected record to the individual. Where an accounting of disclosure has been maintained, the system manager shall advise all previous recipients of the record of the fact that a correction has been made and the substance of the correction. Where practicable, the system manager shall advise the Privacy Appeals Officer that a request to amend has been approved.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule conttains summary financial information extracted from
Dean Witter World Currency Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      17,895,674
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,720<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,148,428<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,148,428<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (661,986)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               403,182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,065,168)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,065,168)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,065,168)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $72,664 and Due from
DWR of $22,056.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $158,034.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $597,532, accrued
management fees of $45,315, and accrued administrative expenses
of $22,349.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $(883,339), net
change in unrealized of $8,109 and interest income of $213,244.
</FN>


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eastern American Natural GasTrust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee ofthe Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theTrust at the dates and for the period presented.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as partof the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

 
|   | The Bank of New York,                          |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|   | Trustee for Eastern American Natural Gas Trust |
|   |                                           |
|   | By:                                            | /s/ Patrick Tadie |   |
|   |                                           | Vice President |
|   |                                           | The Bank of New York |
|        |                                                |  |  |  |

 

----
### SUBCHAPTER IV—LIABILITIES OF AND RESTRICTIONS ON LABOR AND MANAGEMENT
### §§1001 to 1004. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–483, Oct. 31, 1990, 104 Stat. 1166

Section 1001, Pub. L. 100–158, §1, Nov. 9, 1987, 101 Stat. 896, related to support for Civic Achievement Award Program in Honor of Office of Speaker of House of Representatives.

Section 1002, Pub. L. 100–158, §2, Nov. 9, 1987, 101 Stat. 897; Pub. L. 101–118, §§2, 3, Oct. 17, 1989, 103 Stat. 698, related to a description of Civic Achievement Award Program conducted by Close Up Foundation, categories of awards, a national committee to advise Close Up Foundation, and participation by libraries.

Section 1003, Pub. L. 100–158, §3, Nov. 9, 1987, 101 Stat. 897, related to audit and reporting requirements of Comptroller General and Close Up Foundation with regard to Civic Achievement Award Program.

Section 1004, Pub. L. 100–158, §4, Nov. 9, 1987, 101 Stat. 898; Pub. L. 101–118, §1, Oct. 17, 1989, 103 Stat. 698, related to authorization of appropriations to carry out Civic Achievement Award Program.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Preamble

Preamble to Pub. L. 100–158 was repealed by Pub. L. 101–483, Oct. 31, 1990, 104 Stat. 1166.
Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the 12 months ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Phillip W. Roe, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofthe Company, certify, for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

            (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                        of the Exchange Act; and

            (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Phillip W. Roe                                 Phillip W. RoeExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerSeptember 23, 2008
-----Original Message-----

From: Sanne Unger [mailto:sanne.majorca@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, March 09, 2020 4:07 PM

To: Daniel Johnson, Secretary; David Schwartz; Laureen Weaver

Cc: B. Fletcher, VP Fair Housing Center of the Greater Palm Beaches

Subject: Reasonable Accommodation Request

Mr. Schwartz, Ms. Weaver, Mr. Johnson,

My husband Steven has a physical disability that limits his mobility, and he is therefore unable to attend 

monthly HOA board meetings and has limited access to the community mailboxes. I am requesting a 

reasonable accommodation be made for him.

Please e-mail either a recording of the board meetings, or a transcript of the monthly board meeting 

minutes to sama59@gmail.com immediately after the meetings occur. Please e-mail all community 

announcements, agendas, notifications, surveys, homeowner correspondence, and any other 

community-related mailings to sama59@gmail.com. 

Kindly respond to my request within seven (7) business days. Thank you for your time and consideration, 

I look forward to receiving your response.

Sanne Unger

5205 Majorca Club Drive

Exhibit A 

Case 9:20-cv-81175-AHS Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 1 of 1
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-64 June 9, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH BG&E TO DISCUSS

APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BG&E) on

Thursday, June 12, to discuss apparent violations at its Calvert

Cliffs nuclear power plant in Lusby, Md. The predecisional

enforcement conference, which begins at 10 a.m., will be held in

the NRC's Regional Office, 475 Allendale Road in King of Prussia,

Pa.

The apparent violations involve a series of problems that

occurred as fuel was being handled during the most recent

refueling outage at the plant, including the poor material

condition of the handling equipment, failure to use engineering

drawings during troubleshooting, failure to follow procedures and

operating equipment contrary to the plant's license requirements.

Also to be discussed is BG&E's failure to control diving

activities in the Unit 2 spent fuel pool. On April 3, the

failure led to a diver moving from a comprehensively surveyed

area at the south end of the pool to unsurveyed areas at the

north end. Consequently, the diver sustained an unplanned

exposure, though no exposure in excess of regulatory limits is

believed to have occurred.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference

does not mean that the NRC has determined a violation has

occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the

purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to

point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its

proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this

conference. That decision will be made by NRC officials at a

later time.

#
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 20-61365-CIV-SINGHAL

AMIR PREISLER,

Plaintiff,

v.

REGIONS BANK,

Defendant.

__________________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 

with Prejudice (DE [18]). The Court having reviewed the notice and being otherwise fully 

advised in the premises, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this cause shall stand DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case and DENY AS MOOT

any pending motions.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 17th day of

February 2021.

Copies furnished to counsel of record via CM/ECF

Case 0:20-cv-61365-AHS Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/17/2021 Page 1 of 1