# Qu a Re p Red H i O‘ahu ,
Latitu d Longi t

DOH F DOH R

Decem b



## Depar t Naval 400 M a JBPH H

Envir o Contr a 

# a rterl p ort- O

i ll Bulk F

, Hawai‘i

d e: 21°2 2 t ude: 15 7

F acility I D R elease I D

b er 2011



## t ment of t F acilitie s a rshall R o H HI 968 6

o nmental a ct Num b 

# y Gr o O uts i

uel Stor a

2 ’15”N 7 °53’33” W

D No. 9-1 0

D No. 99 0

t he Nav y s Engine e

o ad 6 0-3139

Technic a b er N627 4 

# o un d i de ( N

a ge Facili

W

0 2271 0 51, 0100

y e ring Co m

a l Servic e 4 2-08-D-1 

# d wat e

N on- T

ty, Joint

11, 0200 2

m mand, H

e s 930, CT O 

# e r M o

T unn

Base Pe a

2 8

H awai‘i

O HC21 

# o nito r el) W

a rl Harb o 

# r ing W ells r-Hicka m ,

# Qu a Re p Red H i O‘ahu ,
Latitu d Longi t

DOH F DOH R

Decem b

Prepare



## Depar t Naval 400 M a JBPH H

Prepare 

## Envir o 650 Iw Honol u Prepare 

## Envir o Contr a 

# a rterl p ort- O

i ll Bulk F

, Hawai‘i

d e: 21°2 2 t ude: 15 7

F acility I D R elease I D

b er 2011

d for:



## t ment of F acilitie s a rshall R o H HI 968 6

d by:


## o net, Inc.

ilei Road u lu, HI 9 6
d under:


## o nmental a ct Num b 

# y Gr o O uts i

uel Stor a

2 ’15”N 7 °53’33” W

D No. 9-1 0

D No. 99 0

Navy s Engine e

o ad 6 0-3139

, Suite 2 0 6 817-531 8

Technic a b er N627 4 

# o un d i de ( N

a ge Facili

W

0 2271 0 51, 0100

e ring Co m

0 4 8

a l Servic e 4 2-08-D-1 

# d wat e

N on- T

ty, Joint

11, 0200 2

m mand, H

e s 930, CT O 

# e r M o

T unn

Base Pe a

2 8

H awai‘i

O HC21 

# o nito r el) W

a rl Harb o 

# r ing W ells r-Hicka m ,Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Table of Contents December 2011



### i 

# Table of Contents

List of Acronyms .............................................................................................................. ............. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. ........... v Section 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ ........ 1-1 1.1 Project Objective ............................................................................................................. . 1-1 1.2 Background .................................................................................................................... .. 1-1 1.2.1 Site Description ....................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Facility Information ................................................................................................ 1-2 1.2.3 UST Information ..................................................................................................... 1-5 1.2.4 Regulatory Updates ................................................................................................. 1-5 1.3 Previous Reports .............................................................................................................. 1-6 Section 2 Monitoring Activities ............................................................................................... ... 2-1 2.1 Groundwater Gauging ...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Groundwater Sampling .................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Monitoring Well Purging ........................................................................................ 2-1 2.2.2 Groundwater Sample Collection ............................................................................. 2-1 2.2.3 Sample Management and Shipment ........................................................................ 2-2 2.3 Analytical Program .......................................................................................................... 2 -2 2.4 Field Quality Control Samples......................................................................................... 2-2 2.5 Laboratory Quality Control Samples ............................................................................... 2-2 2.6 Equipment Decontamination ........................................................................................... 2-3 2.7 Investigation-Derived Waste Management ...................................................................... 2-3 Section 3 Groundwater Analytical Results ................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Summary of Groundwater An alytical Results ................................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 Data Quality Control Results .................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Groundwater Contaminant Trend .................................................................................... 3-2 Section 4 Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations ....................................................... 4-1 4.1 Summary ....................................................................................................................... ... 4-1 4.2 Conclusions ................................................................................................................... ... 4-1 4.3 Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 4- 2 Section 5 References .......................................................................................................... ......... 5-1
Tables Table 1-1: Outside Monitoring Well Information ...................................................................... 1-5 Table 3-1: Analytical Results for Quarterl y Groundwater Monitori ng-Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells, October 2011 .................................................................................................. 3-3 Table 3-2: Field QC Results-O utside Wells, October 2011 ....................................................... 3-5 Table 3-3: Histori cal and Current Groundwater Sample Analytical Results, August 2009 through October 2011 ................................................................................................ 3-7Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Table of Contents December 2011



### ii Figures Figure 1-1: Groundwater Monito ring Well Location Map ......................................................... 1-3 Appendices Appendix A: DOH Correspondence Appendix B: Field Notebook Appendix C: Groundwater Sampling Logs Appendix D: Laboratory Anal ytical Results, October 2011Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i List of Acronyms December 2011



### iii 

# List of Acronyms

μ g/L micrograms per liter % percent amsl above mean sea level bTOC below top of casing COPC chemical of potential concern CTO Contract Task Order DL detection limit or method detection limit (MDL) DLNR Department of Land and Natural Resources DOH State of Hawai‘i Department of Health DON Department of the Navy DRO diesel range organics EAL Environmental Action Level EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPH extractable petroleum hydrocarbon F-76 marine diesel fuel FLC Fleet Logistics Center GRO gasoline range organics HAR Hawai‘i Administrative Rules IDW investigation-derived waste J Estimated result. Indicates that the compound was identified but the concentration was above the DL and below the LOQ. JP Jet Propellant LOD limit of detection LOQ limit of quantitation or reporting limit (RL) MADEP Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection MS matrix spike MSD matrix spike duplicate NA not available NAVFAC Naval Facilities Engineering Command NAVSUP 

### United States Naval Supply Systems Command ND not detected PAHs polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons pH hydrogen activity PHWS Pearl Harbor Water System PPE personal protective equipment Q data qualifier QC quality control RHSF Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility RPD relative percent difference TEC The Environmental Company, Inc. TOC top of casing TPH total petroleum hydrocarbons U Indicates the compound or analyte was analyzed for but not detected. The result is reported as ND. U.S. United States USGS United States Geological Survey UST underground storage tank VOC volatile organic compound VPH volatile petroleum hydrocarbonQuarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i List of Acronyms December 2011



### iv This page is intentionally left blank.Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Executive Summary December 2011



### v 

# Executive Summary
There are 18 active and two inactive, 12.5 million gallon capacity, field-constructed underground storage tanks (USTs) located at the Red Hill Bu lk Fuel Storage Facility (RHSF). Previous environmental site investigations indicated a release had occurred and contaminated the groundwater underlying the RHSF. The United States (U.S.) Navy implemented a groundwater monitoring program, which includes collecting quarterly groundwater samples fr om U.S. Navy Well 2254-01 (RHMW2254-01) and four groundwater monitoring wells (RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW 03, and RHMW05) installed in the RHSF lower access tunnel. The U.S. Navy Well 2254-01 is located approximately 3,000 feet downgradient from the RHSF and provides approximately 24 percen t (%) of the potable water to the Pearl Harbor Water System (PHWS) . The groundwater samples are analyzed for petroleum constituents and compared against St ate of Hawai‘i Departme nt of Health (DOH) Drinking Water Environmental Ac tion Levels (EALs) (DOH, 2009). In response to increasing concentrations of ch emicals of potential concern (COPCs) in the groundwater monitoring wells w ithin the facility (specifically RHMW02) during 2008, plans were made to conduct four quarterly monitoring events starting in August 2009 and ending in April 2010 at the following outside ( non-tunnel) monitoring well locations:

 RHMW04;

 Oily Waste Disposal Facility Monitoring Well 01 (OWDFMW01); and

 H ā lawa Deep Well 2253-03 (HDMW2253-03). The four consecutive quarterly m onitoring events indicated all CO PC concentrations were below the EALs for samples collected at monitori ng well RHMW04. In Janua ry 2010 concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) diesel ra nge organics (DRO) were above the EALs at OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03. As a result, quarterly monitoring was discontinued at RHMW04 and continued at the two remaining outside monitoring wells. This groundwater monitoring report presents the an alytical results for samples co llected on October 26, 2011 at the two outside monitoring wells (OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03). Laboratory analytical results i ndicate that all COPC concentr ations during the October 2011 monitoring event were below the EALs. Dissolved lead was detected at a concentration of 0.9 micrograms per liter ( μ g/L) in monitoring well HDMW 2253-03 and at an estimated concentration of 0.19 μ g/L in monitoring well OWDFMW01. Benzene was detected at an estimated concentration of 0.92 μ g/L in monitoring well HDMW2253-03. All other COPCs were not detected at or above the limits of detection (LODs) a nd limits of quantitation (LOQs). All LODs and LOQs were generall y below the EALs for COPCs where EALs were available. In the case where an EAL for a specific COPC is le ss than the LOQ, it is generally acceptable to consider the LOQ in place of the EAL (DOH, 2009) . The results of this groundwater monitoring event indicate significant concentrations of COPCs detected within the facility are not impacting these two outside monitoring wells.Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Executive Summary December 2011



### vi Collective concentrations of aliphatic and arom atic hydrocarbons were analyzed this monitoring event utilizing Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) extractable petroleum hydrocarbon (EPH) and volatile pe troleum hydrocarbon (VPH) methods to more accurately determine if the TPH-DRO detected is petroleum based or non-petroleum based (DOH, 2010, Appendix A). The subsequent three consecutive quarterly m onitoring events will not include MADEP EP H and VPH analyses. MADEP EPH analytical results for TPH-DRO typical ly have the majority of the hydrocarbons in the C 10 

### -C 20 

### range. Current analytical results have the majority of the hydrocarbons toward the higher carbon range (C 19 

### -C 36 

### ) which indicate that the detected hydrocarbons are most likely from non-petroleum sources. Only C 19 

### -C 36 

### aliphatic hydrocarbons were detected at a concentration of 226 μ g/L in monitoring well HDMW2253-03 and at an estimated concentration of 41.0 μ g/L in monitoring well OWDFMW01. All COPC concentrations have been below the EALs for five and seven consecutive quarterly monitoring even ts for samples collected at monitoring wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03, respectively. Reduced frequency of sampling from quarterly to annual groundwater monitoring of both monitoring wells is recommended.Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 1 Introduction December 2011



### 1-1 

# Section 1 Introduction
This report presents the results of the Oct ober 2011 quarterly groundwater monitoring event at the two outside monitoring wells (OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03) at the RHSF, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam (JBPHH), O‘ahu, Hawai‘i (F igure 1-1). The groundwater monitoring was performed by Environet for the Department of the Navy (DON), Naval Fa cilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Hawai‘i un der Environmental Technical Services, Contract Number N62742-08-D-1930, Contract Task Order (CTO) HC21. This groundwater monitoring event is consider ed supplemental to the quarterly groundwater monitoring program conducted with in the tunnels of the RHSF. This supplemental groundwater monitoring was conducted in response to increas ing concentrations of COPCs in a groundwater monitoring well within the RH SF, specifically RHMW02, during the October 2008 groundwater monitoring event. The field activities perf ormed for the October 2011 quarterly groundwater monitoring event were conducted in accordance with the procedures described in the Work Plan, Long-Term Monitoring, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i (Environet, 2010). 

# 1.1 Project Objective
The groundwater monitoring was performed to ev aluate the presence of COPCs in groundwater surrounding the RHSF. The groundwater monitori ng was conducted to ensure the DON remains in compliance with DOH UST re lease response requirements as described in Hawai‘i Administrative Rules (HAR) 11-281 S ubchapter 7, Release Response Action. 

# 1.2 Background
The U.S. Navy implemented a groundwater m onitoring program, which includes collecting quarterly groundwater samples from U.S. Navy Well 2254-01 (RHMW2254-01) and four groundwater monitoring wells (RHMW01, RH MW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05) installed in the RHSF lower access tunnel. The U.S. Navy We ll 2254-01 is located approximately 3,000 feet downgradient from the RHSF and provides appr oximately 24% of the potable water to the PHWS. The groundwater samples are analyzed fo r petroleum constituents and compared against DOH Drinking Water EALs (DOH, 2009). In response to increasing con centrations of COPCs in the gr oundwater monitori ng wells within the facility (specifical ly RHMW02) during 2008, plans were made to conduct four quarterly monitoring events starting in August 2009 and ending in April 2010 at the following outside (non-tunnel) monitoring well locations:

 RHMW04;

 Oily Waste Disposal Facility Monitoring Well 01 (OWDFMW01); and

 H ā lawa Deep Well 2253-03 (HDMW2253-03).Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 1 Introduction December 2011



### 1-2 The four consecutive quarterly m onitoring events indicated all CO PC concentrations were below the EALs for samples collected at monitori ng well RHMW04. In Janua ry 2010 concentrations of TPH-DRO were above the EALs at OWDF MW01 and HDMW2253-03. As a result, quarterly monitoring was discontinued at RHMW04 and continued at the two remaining outside monitoring wells. This groundwater monitoring repor t presents the analytic al results for samples collected on October 26, 2011 at the two outside monitoring wells (OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03). The following sec tions provide a description of the site and information on the RHSF and USTs.


## 1.2.1 Site Description The RHSF is located on the island of O‘ahu, Hawa i‘i, approximately 2.5 miles northeast of Pearl Harbor in H ā lawa Heights (Figure 1-1). Land adjacent to the north of the RHSF is occupied by the H ā lawa Correctional Facility and private busine sses. Land to the s outh and west of the facility includes the Coast Guard Reservation and other residential neighborhoods. Moanalua Valley is located east of the facility (Environet, 2010). The Navy Public Works Department operates a pot able water infiltratio n tunnel approximately 1,550 feet hydraulically downgrad ient from the RHSF (Environet, 2010). The U.S. Navy Well 2254-01 is located approximately 3,000 feet dow ngradient (west) of the RHSF and provides approximately 24% of the potable water to the PHWS, which serves approximately 52,200 military consumers (The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC), 2008).


## 1.2.2 Facility Information The RHSF consists of 18 active and two inactive USTs operated by the United States Naval Supply Systems Command (NAVSUP) Fleet Logistics Center (FLC ) Pearl Harbor. Each UST has a capacity of 12.5 million gallons. The RHSF is located approximately 100 feet above the basal aquifer (Dawson Group, Inc., 2006). In 2002, the U.S. Navy installed a groundwater monitoring well (RHMW01) into the basal aquifer, directly down-gradient from the RHSF, within the lower access tunnel. Groundwater samples from this well indicated that petroleum from the RHSF has migrated to the basal aquifer (AMEC Earth and Environmental, Inc., 2002) . In 2005, the U.S. Navy began quarterly monitoring of the aquifer to prot ect their down-gradient drinking water resource associated with the U.S. Navy Well 2254-01. By September 2005, the U.S. Navy had insta lled two more groundwater monitoring wells (RHMW02 and RHMW03) within the RHSF US T system, a groundwater monitoring well (RHMW04) north of the RHSF (adjacent to th e U.S. Navy Firing Range), and a groundwater monitoring well within the U.S. Navy Well 2254-01 infiltration gallery (RHMW2254-01). Since 2005, RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW2254-01 ha ve been sampled quarterly for TPH-DRO, TPH-gasoline range organics (GRO), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and dissolved lead. Due to increasing concentrations of COPCs at the groundwater monitoring wells within the RHSF (specifically RHMW02) during 2008, response measures were warranted. In April 2009, another groundwater monitoring well (RHMW05) was installed within th e lower access tunnel@ A @ A @ A @ A @ A @ A @ A @ A

@ ? @ ? @ ? @ ?

@ ? @ ? @ ? @ ?

@ ? @ ? @ ? @ ?

@ ? @ ? @ ? @ ?

@ ? @ ? ! (

O W D F M W 0 1 R H M W 2 2 5 4
- 0 1
R H M W 0 5 R H M W 0 1 R H M W 0 2 R H M W 0 3 H D M W 2 2 5 3
- 0 3

S V M P 0 2 S V M P 0 3

S V M P 0 4 S V M P 0 6 S V M P 0 8 S V M P 1 0 S V M P 1 2 S V M P 1 4 S V M P 1 6 S V M P 1 8 S V M P 2 0 S V M P 0 5 S V M P 0 7 S V M P 0 9 S V M P 1 1 S V M P 1 3 S V M P 1 5 S V M P 1 7 H ā l a w a I n d u s t r i a l P a r k H ā l a w a C o r r e c t i o n a l F a c i l i t y

H ā l a w a S t r e a m R H M W 0 4

U

. S

. N a v y W e l l 2 2 5 4
- 0 1

H ā l a w a S h a f t B o a r d o f W a t e r S u p p l y P u m p S t a t i o n ( 2 3 5 4
- 0 1 )

C o a s t G u a r d R e s e r v a t i o n M o a n a l u a V i l l a g e N a v y F i r i n g R a n g e @ ? S o i l V a p o r M o n i t o r i n g P o i n t s @ A G r o u n d w a t e r M o n i t o r i n g W e l l s ! ( B o a r d o f W a t e r S u p p l y P u m p S t a t i o n H a l a w a C o r r e c t i o n a l F a c i l i t y R e d H i l l N a v a l R e s e r v a t i o n H ā l a w a S t r e a m

1 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 5 0 0 F e e t F i g u r e 1
- 1 G r o u n d w a t e r M o n i t o r i n g W e l l L o c a t i o n M a p L E G E N D



#  ̄ U S G S , 2 0 0 5 S O U R C E

P e a r l H a r b o r
Q u a r t e r l y G r o u n d w a t e r M o n i t o r i n g R e p o r t , R e d H i l l B u l k F u e l S t o r a g e F a c i l i t y , J B P H H , O ' a h u , H a w a i ' iQuarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 1 Introduction December 2011



### 1-4 This page is intentionally left blank.Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 1 Introduction December 2011



### 1-5 between RHMW01 and RHMW2254-01. It was insta lled to identify the extent of contaminant migration in groundwater before it reach es the infiltration gallery at RHMW2254-01. Additionally, plans were made to sample thre e monitoring wells surr ounding and outside of RHSF: RHMW04, OWDFMW01, and HDMW2253-03 (F igure 1-1 and Table 1-1). RHMW04 was installed to evaluate gr oundwater within the basal aqui fer upgradient from RHSF. OWDFMW01 (originally known as MW08) was inst alled into the basal aquifer in 1998 for a Phase II Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study for the Red Hill Oily Waste Disposal Facility (Earth Tech, Inc., 2000). It is located geographi cally down-gradient of the USTs and U.S. Navy Well 2254-01. HDMW2253-03 is controlled by th e State of Hawai‘i Commission on Water Resource Management. HDMW2253-03 is locat ed between the RHSF and the municipal drinking water supply well whic h is operated by the City and County of Honolulu Board of Water Supply (H ā lawa Shaft Pumping Stati on 2354-01) (Figure 1-1).

Table 1-1: Outside Moni toring Well Information Groundwater Monitoring Well bTOC Elevation (feet amsl) Depth to Water (feet bTOC) Total Depth of Well (feet) RHMW04 313.03 --- 320 OWDFMW01 138.94 120.00 142.8 HDMW2253-03 225 207. 73* 1,575 Notes: *Depth to water provided by the Department of La nd and Natural Resources (DLNR) on October 26, 2011. --- Depth to water was not gauged at RHMW04 on October, 26 2011 because it is no longer a part of the sampling program. amsl - above mean sea level bTOC - below top of casing 

## 1.2.3 UST Information The USTs were constructed in th e early 1940s. The tanks were c onstructed of steel and currently contain Jet Propellant (JP)-5 fuel, JP-8, and marine diesel fuel (F -76). Previously, several tanks stored Navy Special Fuel Oil, Navy Distillate, av iation gasoline, and motor gasoline. Each tank measures approximately 245 feet in height and 100 feet in diameter. The upper domes of the tanks lie at depths varying between approxima tely 100 feet and 200 feet below the existing ground surface (TEC, 2006).


## 1.2.4 Regulatory Updates During the summer and fall of 2008, DOH updated their EALs, which resulted in significant changes to the action levels associated with me thylnaphthalenes. The drinking water toxicity EAL for these compounds was 240 μg/L. This c oncentration presumed that methylnaphthalenes were non-carcinogenic. Evidence th at they are human carcinogens has now been accepted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As a result, DOH adopted more rigorous EALs of 4.7 μg/L for 1-methylnaphthalene and 24 μg/L for 2-methylnaphthalene, corresponding to a residential tap water scenario, and a one in a million cancer risk (DOH, 2009). Also, the drinking water EAL for naphthalene was increa sed from 6.2 μg/L to 17 μg/L (DOH, 2009). Finally, the DOH Drinking Water EAL for TPH-DRO was increased from 100 μg/L to 210 μg/L, although the DOH Groundwater Gross Contamina tion EAL for TPH-DRO remains 100 μg/L.Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 1 Introduction December 2011



### 1-6 

# 1.3 Previous Reports
The following groundwater monitoring reports were previously submitted to the DOH for the groundwater monitoring we lls within the RHSF:
1. Groundwater Sampling Report, First Quarter 2005 (submitted April 2005); 2. Groundwater Sampling Report, Second Quarter 2005 (submitted August 2005); 3. Groundwater Sampling Report, Third Quarter 2005 (submitted November 2005); 4. Groundwater Sampling Report, Fourth Quarter 2005 (submitted February 2006); 5. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2006 (submitted September 2006); 6. Groundwater Monitoring Results, December 2006 (submitted January 2007); 7. Groundwater Monitoring Results, March 2007 (submitted May 2007); 8. Groundwater Monitoring Results, June 2007 (submitted August 2007); 9. Groundwater Monitoring Results, September 2007 (submitted October 2007); 10. Groundwater Monitoring Results, January 2008 (submitted March 2008); 11. Groundwater Monitoring Results, April 2008 (submitted May 2008); 12. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2008 (submitted October 2008); 13. Groundwater Monitoring Results, October and December 2008 (submitted February 2009); 14. Groundwater Monitoring Results, February 2009 (submitted May 2009); 15. Groundwater Monitoring Results, May 2009 (submitted July 2009); 16. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2009 (submitted September 2009); 17. Groundwater Monitoring Results, Oc tober 2009 (submitted December 2009); 18. Groundwater Monitoring Results, January, February, and March 2010 (submitted April 2010); 19. Groundwater Monitoring Results, April 2010 (submitted May 2010); 20. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2010 (submitted August 2010); 21. Groundwater Monitoring Results, Oc tober 2010 (submitted December 2010); 22. Groundwater Monitoring Results, January 2011 (submitted March 2011); 23. Groundwater Monitoring Results, April 2011 (submitted June 2011); and 24. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2011 (submitted September 2011). The following groundwater monitoring reports were previously submitted to the DOH for the groundwater monitoring wells outside the RHSF:
1. Groundwater Monitoring Results, August 2009 (submitted September 2009);Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 1 Introduction December 2011



### 1-7 2. Groundwater Monitoring Results, Oc tober 2009 (submitted December 2009); 3. Groundwater Monitoring Results, January 2010 (submitted April 2010); 4. Groundwater Monitoring Results, April 2010 (submitted May 2010); 5. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2010 (submitted August 2010); 6. Groundwater Monitoring Results, Oc tober 2010 (submitted December 2010); 7. Groundwater Monitoring Results, January 2011 (submitted March 2011); 8. Groundwater Monitoring Results, April 2011 (submitted June 2011); and 9. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2011 (submitted September 2011).Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 1 Introduction December 2011



### 1-8 This page is intentionally left blank.Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 2 Monitoring Activities December 2011



### 2-1 

# Section 2 Monitoring Activities
Groundwater monitoring was conducted on October 26, 2011 in accordance with the site specific Work Plan (Environet, 2010). Field activities were documente d in the field notebook (Appendix B). 

# 2.1 Groundwater Gauging
Groundwater gauging measurements were collected at the two monitoring wells (OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03) prior to purging and sample co llection. A Solinst water level meter was used to measure the depth to groundwater to the nearest 0.01 foot within monitoring well OWDFMW01, according to the procedures described in Procedure I-C-3, Monitoring Well Sampling (DON, 2007). The depth to groundwater for monitoring well HDMW2253-03 was measured by a Department of Land and Natura l Resources (DLNR) employee prior to well purging (Table 1-1). 

# 2.2 Groundwater Sampling Groundwater samples were collected from the tw o monitoring wells according to the procedures described in Procedure I-C-3, Monitoring Well Sampling (DON, 2007).


## 2.2.1 Monitoring Well Purging Due to the well construction characteristics of OWDFMW01 and HDMW 2253-03 (large casing diameter of approximately 12 inches from the top of casing (TOC) to approximately 50 feet below the groundwater surface then the well is open [not cased] from approximately 250 feet below TOC (bTOC) to 1,575 feet bTOC), three we ll casing volumes were not purged prior to sampling. Instead, water was purged using dispos able bailers until three or more successive water quality parameter measurements ha d stabilized within 10%. A Horiba ® 

### U-22 multi-parameter water quality meter was used to measure hydrogen activity (pH), temperature, specific conductivity, dissolved oxy gen, turbidity, and oxidation reducti on potential. At least six readings were recorded on Groundwater Sampling Log data sheets (Appendix C).


## 2.2.2 Groundwater Sample Collection Groundwater samples were collected from OWDFMW01 using four-inch and two-inch disposable bailers and were collected directly into laboratory provided, specially cleaned sample containers already containing the ap propriate preservatives (i.e., nitr ic acid for dissolved lead or hydrochloric acid for aliphatic and aromatic hydro carbon analyses). The dissolved lead samples were filtered in the field at OWDFMW01 and placed in polyethylene bottles containing the appropriate preservative. Groundwater samples were collected from HDMW2253-03 using a four-inch double stop disposable bailer collected directly into laborator y provided, specially clean ed sample containers containing the appropriate preservatives. Due to the well construction characteristics of HDMW2253-03, a grab sample was collected at a depth below the solid casing (which extends about 50 feet below the water table) and within the open-holed portion of the well. DissolvedQuarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 2 Monitoring Activities December 2011



### 2-2 lead samples collected from HDMW2253-03 require d laboratory filtrati on due to the doublestop bailer required to collect the sample.


## 2.2.3 Sample Management and Shipment Each sample container sent to the laboratory was assigned a project-sp ecific chain of custody identification number and a descriptive identification number. The sample identifiers provided specific data unique to each sample and were entered into the field notebook. The samples were labeled according to the procedures described in Procedure III-E, Record Keeping, Sample Labeling, and Chain-of-Custody (DON, 2007). Following sample collection and labeling, the sa mple containers were packaged with bubble wrap and placed into individual ZipLoc  

### bags, then immediately into insulated coolers with ice for preservation. The samples were shipped via FedEx to the laboratory on the same day of collection. The samples were managed unde r standard chain of custody protocol and documentation from collection to delivery to th e laboratory. Sample handling, storage, and transport were performed according to the re quirements described in Procedure III-F, Sample Handling, Storage, and Shipping (DON, 2007). 

# 2.3 Analytical Program During the October 2011 groundwater monitoring event, two sets of primary groundwater samples, one set of duplicate groundwater samp les, and one set of quality control (QC) groundwater samples were submitted to APPL, Inc. located in Clovis, California. Groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs and TP H-GRO by EPA Method 826 0B, TPH-DRO by EPA Method 8015B, PAHs by EPA Method 8270D SIM, dissolved lead by EPA Method 6020, and collective aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons by MADEP EPH and VPH methods. The results of the laboratory analyses are pres ented and discussed in Section 3. 

# 2.4 Field Quality Control Samples Field QC procedures were followed to ensure viab ility and integrity of sample analytical data. Field duplicates were collected according to th e procedures described in Procedure III-B, Field QC Samples (Water, Soil) (DON, 2007) and the Work Plan (E nvironet, 2010). Field duplicate samples were collected at a minimum of 10% of primary samples and analyzed for the same contaminants. Field rinsate samples were not required since disposable bailers were used. 

# 2.5 Laboratory Quality Control Samples Laboratory QC samples were analyzed as part of the standard laboratory QC protocols as presented in the Work Plan (Environet, 2010). Laboratory QC for the groundwater monitoring event consisted of matrix spike (MS)/matrix spik e duplicate (MSD) samples for organic analysis. Laboratory QC samples were collected and analyzed according to the procedures described in Procedure III-A Laboratory QC Samples (Water, Soil) (DON, 2007). Laboratory QC MS/MSD samples are an aliquot (i.e., a subset) of the fiel d sample; they are not separate samples, but a special designation of an existing sample. Labor atory QC MS/MSD samples were analyzed for the same constituents as the standard samples. At a minimum, one MS/MSD sample pair was required per 20 samples, including duplicates.Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 2 Monitoring Activities December 2011



### 2-3 

# 2.6 Equipment Decontamination Decontamination of monitoring equipment was pe rformed to ensure data quality, to prevent cross contamination, and to prevent the potential introduction of contamin ants into previously un-impacted areas. Decontamination of monito ring equipment (i.e., Solinst water level meter and Horiba ® 

### U-22 water quality meter) was conducted between monitoring locations according to the procedures described in Procedure I-F, Equipment Decontamination (DON, 2007). Decontamination water generated at monitori ng well OWDFMW01 was disposed of in the RHSF’s lower tunnel oil/ water separator sump. 

# 2.7 Investigation-Derived Waste Management Investigation-derived waste (IDW) was managed in accordance with the procedures described in Procedure I-A-6, IDW Management (DON, 2007). The various poten tial waste streams included the following:

 personal protective equipment (PPE) including: nitrile gloves, etc.;

 liquids including: equipment rins e water and purged groundwater; and

 disposable sampling equipment and supplie s, including: bailers , poly sheeting, etc. Equipment rinse water and purge water from OWDFMW01 was disposed of in the RHSF’s lower tunnel oil/water separa tor sump. Purge water from monitoring well HDMW2253-03 was disposed of in the surrounding grass (as direct ed by DLNR) since it was of drinking water quality. Spent PPE and non-contaminated sample jars and bottles (acid free) were disposed of on a daily basis as solid waste.Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 2 Monitoring Activities December 2011



### 2-4 This page is intentionally left blank.Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 3 Groundwater Analytical Results December 2011



### 3-1 

# Section 3 Groundwater Analytical Results

This section provides a summary of analytical results for groundwater samples collected from the two outside monitoring wells on October 26, 2011. Complete analytical laboratory reports are provided in Appendix D (on CD-ROM). 

# 3.1 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results

OWDFMW01 Dissolved lead was detected in OWDFMW01 at an estimated concentration of 0.19 μ g/L which is below both the Drinking Water EAL (15 μ g/L) and the Gross Contamination EAL (5,000 μ g/) (Table 3-1, Table 3-2).
All other COPCs were not detected at or above the LODs and LOQs in OWDFMW01. All LODs and LOQs were generally below the EALs. In the case where an EAL for a specific COPC is less than the LOQ, it is generally accept able to consider the LOQ in place of the EAL (DOH, 2009). Aliphatic hydrocarbons (C 19 

### -C 36 

### ) by MADEP EPH method and aliphatic hydrocarbons (C 9 

### -C 12 

### ) by MADEP VPH method were detected at estimated concentrations of 41.0 μ g/L and 13.8 μ g/L, respectively (Table 3-1, Table 3-2).
HDMW2253-03 Dissolved lead was detected in monitoring well HDMW2253- 03 at a concentration of 0.9 μ g/L which is below both the Drinking Water EAL (15 μ g/L) and the Gross Contamination EAL (5,000 μ g/L) (Table 3-1). Benzene was detected in monitoring well HDMW2253-03 at an estimated concentration of 0.92 μ g/L which is below both the Drinking Water EAL (5 μ g/L) and the Gross Contamination EAL (170 μ g/L).All other COPCs were no t detected at or above the LODs and LOQs in HDMW2253-03. All LODs and LOQs were generally below the EALs. In the case where an EAL for a specific COPC is le ss than the LOQ, it is generally acceptable to consider the LOQ in place of the EAL (DOH, 2009). Aliphatic hydrocarbons (C 19 

### -C 36 

### ) by MADEP EPH method were det ected at a concentration of 226 μ g/L (Table 3-1, Table 3-2).


## 3.1.1 Data Quality Control Results The laboratory quality control results were all within the control limits. The relative percent difference (RPD) of field duplicates for all analytes were within th e 50% criteria. The trip blank that accompanied the outside well samples did not contain detectable levels of any COPCs. The data quality control results indica te that the data obtained for this monitoring event are suitable for their intended use (Table 3-2).Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 3 Groundwater Analytical Results December 2011



### 3-2 

# 3.2 Groundwater Contaminant Trend
Concentrations of PAHs and VOCs were previ ously not detected above the EALs during the August 2009, October 2009, January 2010, April 2010, July 2010, October 2010, January 2011, April 2011, and July 2011 groundwater monitoring events. These constituents were also not detected above the EALs during this Oc tober 2011 groundwater monitoring event.
TPH-DRO concentrations in OWDFMW01 have significantly decreased from January 2010 (1,490 μ g/L) to April 2010 (288 μ g/L) and to non-detect in October 2010, January 2011, April 2011, July 2011, and October 2011 (Table 3-1 and Ta ble 3-3). The concen trations of TPH-DRO at this monitoring well have decreased to non -detect for five consec utive monitoring events (Table 3-3). TPH-DRO concentratio ns at this well are decreasing.
The concentrations of TPH-DRO at HDMW2253- 03 have decreased to non-detect for seven consecutive groundwater monitori ng events (Table 3-3).
The October 2010 detection of acetone at an es timated concentration below the DOH Drinking Water EAL was the first at monitoring well OWDF MW01. Acetone was also detected at an estimated concentration in the tr ip blank sample. This suggested that acetone was introduced to the samples during transport to and from the labo ratory, and is not repres entative of groundwater at OWDFMW01. This conclusion was confirme d in the January 2011, April 2011, July 2011, and October 2011 monitoring events as acetone was not detected in any of the samples collected.
The October 2010 detections of lead at conc entrations below the DOH Drinking Water EAL were the first at these two monitoring we lls (OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03). Lead was not detected in any of the samples in the Janu ary 2011 monitoring event or during April 2011. Estimated concentrations of lead below the DOH Drinking Water EAL were detected at both wells during the July 2011 monitoring event. The October 2011 detections of lead at concentrations below the DOH Drinking Water EA L were the third at these two monitoring wells (OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03). Lead was detected at a concentration below the DOH Drinking Water EAL in monitoring well HDMW2253-03, and at an estimated concentration below the DOH Drinking Water EAL in monitoring well OWDFMW01 in this October 2011 monitoring event. The January 2011 detection of benzene at an es timated concentration be low the DOH Drinking Water EAL in OWDFMW01 was the first at this m onitoring well. Benzene was detected at an estimated concentration in the duplicate samp le collected from OWDFMW01 in April 2011, however it was not detected in the July 2011 or the October 2011 monitoring event. The April 2011 detections of xylenes and tolu ene in OWDFMW01 and be nzene in monitoring well HDMW2253-03 at estimated concentrations below the DOH Drinking Water EALs were the first at these monitoring wells. Xylenes, to luene and benzene were non-detect in July 2011. Xylenes and toluene were non-detect, but benzene was detected at an estimated concentration below the DOH Drinking Water EAL in monito ring well HDMW2253-03 in the October 2011 monitoring event (Table 3-1).Table 3-1: Analytical Results for Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring-Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells, October 2011

Result Q LOQ LOD DL Result Q LOQ LOD DL
C11-C22 Aromatics - - ND U 101 42.5 ND U 101 42.5 C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons - - 41.0 J 101 31.6 226 101 31.6 C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons - - ND U 101 22.0 ND U 101 22.0 C5-C8 Aliphatic - - ND U 30.0 3.31 ND U 30.0 3.31 C9-C10 Aromatic - - ND U 10.0 1.24 ND U 10.0 1.24 C9-C12 Aliphatic - - 13.8 J 20.0 3.20 ND U 20.0 3.20 EPA 8015B (Petroleum) TPH-DRO 210 100 ND U 150 80.8 40.4 ND U 150 80.8 40.4 EPA 8260B (Petroleum) TPH-GRO 100 100 ND U 20.0 12.12 6.06 ND U 20.0 12.12 6.06 Acenaphthene 370 20 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 Acenaphthylene 240 2000 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 Anthracene 1800 22 ND U 0.2 0.10 0.05 ND U 0.2 0.10 0.05 Benzo(a)anthracene 0.092 4.7 ND U 0.2 b 0.14 0.07 ND U 0.2 b 0.14 0.07 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1500 0.13 ND U 0.2 b 0.16 0.08 ND U 0.2 b 0.16 0.08 Benzo(a)pyrene 0.2 0.81 ND U 0.2 0.14 0.07 ND U 0.2 0.14 0.07 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.092 0.75 ND U 0.2 b 0.12 0.06 ND U 0.2 b 0.12 0.06 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.92 0.4 ND U 0.2 0.14 0.07 ND U 0.2 0.14 0.07 Chrysene 9.2 1 ND U 0.2 0.10 0.05 ND U 0.2 0.10 0.05 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.0092 0.52 ND U 0.2 b 0.10 0.05 ND U 0.2 b 0.10 0.05 Fluoranthene 1500 130 ND U 0.2 0.16 0.08 ND U 0.2 0.16 0.08 Fluorene 240 950 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.092 0.095 ND U 0.2 b 0.14 0.07 ND U 0.2 b 0.14 0.07 1,-Methylnaphthalene 4.7 10 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 2,-Methylnaphthalene 24 10 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 Naphthalene 17 21 ND U 0.2 0.10 0.05 ND U 0.2 0.10 0.05 Phenanthrene 240 410 ND U 0.2 0.14 0.07 ND U 0.2 0.14 0.07 Pyrene 180 68 ND U 0.2 0.16 0.08 ND U 0.2 0.16 0.08 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 970 ND U 1.0 0.28 0.14 ND U 1.0 0.28 0.14 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 50,000 ND U 1.0 0.40 0.20 ND U 1.0 0.40 0.20 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.4 50,000 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 1,1-Dichloroethylene (1,1-Dichloroethene) 7 1,500 ND U 1.0 0.60 0.30 ND U 1.0 0.60 0.30 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.6 50,000 ND U 2.0 b 0.78 0.39 ND U 2.0 b 0.78 0.39 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70 3,000 ND U 1.0 0.42 0.21 ND U 1.0 0.42 0.21 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.04 10 ND U 2.0 b 1.52 0.76 ND U 2.0 b 1.52 0.76 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.0065 50,000 ND U 1.0 b 0.40 0.20 ND U 1.0 b 0.40 0.20 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 600 10 ND U 1.0 0.34 0.17 ND U 1.0 0.34 0.17 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.15 7,000 ND U 1.0 b 0.28 0.14 ND U 1.0 b 0.28 0.14 1,2-Dichloropropane 5 10 ND U 1.0 0.34 0.17 ND U 1.0 0.34 0.17 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 180 50,000 ND U 1.0 0.22 0.11 ND U 1.0 0.22 0.11 1,3-Dichloropropene (total of cis/trans) 0.43 50,000 ND U 1.0 0.36 0.18 ND U 1.0 0.36 0.18 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 75 5 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 Acetone 22,000 20,000 ND U 10.0 1.90 0.95 ND U 10.0 1.90 0.95 Benzene 5 170 ND U 1.0 0.32 0.16 0.92 J 1.0 0.32 0.16 Bromodichloromethane 0.22 50,000 ND U 1.0 b 0.28 0.14 ND U 1.0 b 0.28 0.14 Bromoform 100 510 ND U 1.0 0.28 0.14 ND U 1.0 0.28 0.14 Bromomethane 8.7 50,000 ND U 2.0 0.48 0.24 ND U 2.0 0.48 0.24 Carbon Tetrachloride 5 520 ND U 1.0 0.20 0.10 ND U 1.0 0.20 0.10 Chlorobenzene 100 50 ND U 1.0 0.42 0.21 ND U 1.0 0.42 0.21 Chloroethane 8,600 16 ND U 1.0 0.42 0.21 ND U 1.0 0.42 0.21 Chloroform 70 2,400 ND U 1.0 0.14 0.07 ND U 1.0 0.14 0.07 Chloromethane 1.8 50,000 ND U 1.0 0.62 0.31 ND U 1.0 0.62 0.31cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene (cis1,2-Dichloroethene) 70 50,000 ND U 1.0 0.32 0.16 ND U 1.0 0.32 0.16
Dibromochloromethane (Chlorodibromomethane) 0.16 50,000 ND U 1.0 b 0.38 0.19 ND U 1.0 b 0.38 0.19 Ethylbenzene 700 30 ND U 1.0 0.46 0.23 ND U 1.0 0.46 0.23 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.86 6 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 7,100 8,400 ND U 10.0 1.20 0.60 ND U 10.0 1.20 0.60 Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-Methyl-2-pentanone) 2,000 1,300 ND U 10.0 3.80 1.90 ND U 10.0 3.80 1.90 Methyl tert-butyl Ether 12 5 ND U 1.0 0.52 0.26 ND U 1.0 0.52 0.26 Methylene chloride 4.8 9,100 ND U 5.0 0.70 0.35 ND U 5.0 0.70 0.35 Styrene 100 10 ND U 1.0 0.50 0.25 ND U 1.0 0.50 0.25 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- 0.52 50,000 ND U 1.0 0.26 0.13 ND U 1.0 0.26 0.13 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 0.067 500 ND U 1.0 b 0.20 0.10 ND U 1.0 b 0.20 0.10 Tetrachloroethylene (Tetrachloroethene) 5 170 ND U 1.0 0.48 0.24 ND U 1.0 0.48 0.24 Toluene 1,000 40 ND U 1.0 0.34 0.17 ND U 1.0 0.34 0.17 trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene (trans-1,2-Dichloroethene) 100 260 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 Trichloroethylene (Trichloroethene) 5 310 ND U 1.0 0.32 0.16 ND U 1.0 0.32 0.16 Vinyl chloride 2 3,400 ND U 1.0 0.46 0.23 ND U 1.0 0.46 0.23 Xylenes 10,000 20 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 EPA 6020 Lead 15 5,000 0.19 J 0.5 0.22 0.11 0.9 0.5 0.22 0.11 Notes:

DRO - diesel range organics GRO - gasoline range organics

LOD - limit of detection LOQ - limit of quantitation or reporting limit (RL) ND - not detected PAHs - polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Q - data qualifier TPH - total petroleum hydrocarbons
VOC - volatile organic compound LODs will be included in the final report. Bold - Result exceeds one or both DOH EALs. HDMW2253-03 (ES055) OWDFMW01

EPA 8270D SIM (PAHs) Method Chemical DOH Drinking Water EALs for Human Toxicity a DOH Groundwater Gross Contamination EALs a

J - Estimated result. Indicates that the compound was identified but the concentration was above the DL and below the LOQ.

U - Indicates the compound or analyte was analyzed for but not detected. The result is reported as ND. Environmental Hazards at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater 2008, updated March 2009). (ES053)

EPA 8260B (VOCs)

a DOH EALs (DOH, 2009): Table D-1b. Groundwater Action Levels (Groundwater is a current or potential drinking water resource; sur face water body is not located within 150 meters of release site.)
b In the case where an EAL for a specific chemical is less than the LOQ for a commercial laboratory, it is generally acceptable t o consider the LOQ in place of the action level (DOH, Evaluation of

DL - detection limit or method detection limit (MDL) All units are in micrograms per liter (μg/L). MADEP EPH

MADEP VPH

- Chemical does not have DOH EALs.Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 3 Groundwater Analytical Results December 2011



### 3-4 This page is intentionally left blank.Table 3-2: Field QC Results-Outside Wells, October 2011

Q LOQ LOD DL Q LOQ LOD DL Q LOQ LOD DL

C11-C22 Aromatics - - ND U 101 42.5 ND U 101 42.5 0 -- -- -- -- C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons - - 41.0 J 101 31.6 66.0 J 101 31.6 47 -- -- -- -- C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons - - ND U 101 22.0 ND U 101 22.0 0 -- -- -- -- C5-C8 Aliphati c - - ND U 30.0 3.31 ND U 30.0 3.31 0 -- -- -- -- C9-C10 Aromatic - - ND U 10.0 1.24 ND U 10.0 1.24 0 -- -- -- -- C9-C12 Aliphati c 13.8 J 20.0 3.20 ND U 20.0 3.20 0 -- -- -- -- EPA 8015B (Petroleum) TPH-DRO 210 100 ND U 150 80.8 40.4 ND U 150 80.8 40.4 0 -- -- -- -- -- EPA 8260B (Petroleum) TPH-GRO 100 100 ND U 20.0 12.12 6.06 ND U 20.0 12.12 6.06 0 ND U 20.0 12.12 6.06 Acenaphthene 370 20 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 0 -- -- -- -- -- Acenaphthylene 240 2000 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 0 -- -- -- -- -- Anthracene 1800 22 ND U 0.2 0.10 0.05 ND U 0.2 0.10 0.05 0 -- -- -- -- -- Benzo(a)anthracene 0.092 4.7 ND U 0.2 b 0.14 0.07 ND U 0.2 b 0.14 0.07 0 -- -- -- -- -- Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1500 0.13 ND U 0.2 b 0.16 0.08 ND U 0.2 b 0.16 0.08 0 -- -- -- -- -- Benzo(a)pyrene 0.2 0.81 ND U 0.2 0.14 0.07 ND U 0.2 0.14 0.07 0 -- -- -- -- -- Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.092 0.75 ND U 0.2 b 0.12 0.06 ND U 0.2 b 0.12 0.06 0 -- -- -- -- -- Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.92 0.4 ND U 0.2 0.14 0.07 ND U 0.2 0.14 0.07 0 -- -- -- -- -- Chrysene 9.2 1 ND U 0.2 0.10 0.05 ND U 0.2 0.10 0.05 0 -- -- -- -- -- Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.0092 0.52 ND U 0.2 b 0.10 0.05 ND U 0.2 b 0.10 0.05 0 -- -- -- -- -- Fluoranthene 1500 130 ND U 0.2 0.16 0.08 ND U 0.2 0.16 0.08 0 -- -- -- -- -- Fluorene 240 950 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 0 -- -- -- -- -- Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.092 0.095 ND U 0.2 b 0.14 0.07 ND U 0.2 b 0.14 0.07 0 -- -- -- -- -- 1,-Methylnaphthalene 4.7 10 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 0 -- -- -- -- -- 2,-Methylnaphthalene 24 10 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 ND U 0.2 0.12 0.06 0 -- -- -- -- -- Naphthalene 17 21 ND U 0.2 0.10 0.05 ND U 0.2 0.10 0.05 0 -- -- -- -- -- Phenanthrene 240 410 ND U 0.2 0.14 0.07 ND U 0.2 0.14 0.07 0 -- -- -- -- -- Pyrene 180 68 ND U 0.2 0.16 0.08 ND U 0.2 0.16 0.08 0 -- -- -- -- -- 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 970 ND U 1.0 0.28 0.14 ND U 1.0 0.28 0.14 0 ND U 1.0 0.28 0.14 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 50,000 ND U 1.0 0.40 0.20 ND U 1.0 0.40 0.20 0 ND U 1.0 0.40 0.20 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.4 50,000 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 0 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 1,1-Dichloroethylene (1,1-Dichloroethene) 7 1,500 ND U 1.0 0.60 0.30 ND U 1.0 0.60 0.30 0 ND U 1.0 0.60 0.30 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.6 50,000 ND U 2.0 b 0.78 0.39 ND U 2.0 b 0.78 0.39 0 ND U 2.0 b 0.78 0.39 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70 3,000 ND U 1.0 0.42 0.21 ND U 1.0 0.42 0.21 0 ND U 1.0 0.42 0.21 1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane 0.04 10 ND U 2.0 b 1.52 0.76 ND U 2.0 b 1.52 0.76 0 ND U 2.0 b 1.52 0.76 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.0065 50,000 ND U 1.0 b 0.40 0.20 ND U 1.0 b 0.40 0.20 0 ND U 1.0 b 0.40 0.20 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 600 10 ND U 1.0 0.34 0.17 ND U 1.0 0.34 0.17 0 ND U 1.0 0.34 0.17 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.15 7,000 ND U 1.0 b 0.28 0.14 ND U 1.0 b 0.28 0.14 0 ND U 1.0 b 0.28 0.14 1,2-Dichloropropane 5 10 ND U 1.0 0.34 0.17 ND U 1.0 0.34 0.17 0 ND U 1.0 0.34 0.17 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 180 50,000 ND U 1.0 0.22 0.11 ND U 1.0 0.22 0.11 0 ND U 1.0 0.22 0.11 1,3-Dichloropropene (total of cis/trans) 0.43 50,000 ND U 1.0 0.36 0.18 ND U 1.0 0.36 0.18 0 ND U 1.0 0.36 0.18 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 75 5 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 0 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 Acetone 22,000 20,000 ND U 10.0 1.90 0.95 ND U 10.0 1.90 0.95 0 ND U 10.0 1.90 0.95 Benzene 5 170 ND U 1.0 0.32 0.16 ND U 1.0 0.32 0.16 0 ND U 1.0 0.32 0.16 Bromodichloromethane 0.22 50,000 ND U 1.0 b 0.28 0.14 ND U 1.0 b 0.28 0.14 0 ND U 1.0 b 0.28 0.14 Bromoform 100 510 ND U 1.0 0.28 0.14 ND U 1.0 0.28 0.14 0 ND U 1.0 0.28 0.14 Bromomethane 8.7 50,000 ND U 2.0 0.48 0.24 ND U 2.0 0.48 0.24 0 ND U 2.0 0.48 0.24 Carbon Tetrachlorid e 5 520 ND U 1.0 0.20 0.10 ND U 1.0 0.20 0.10 0 ND U 1.0 0.20 0.10 Chlorobenzene 100 50 ND U 1.0 0.42 0.21 ND U 1.0 0.42 0.21 0 ND U 1.0 0.42 0.21 Chloroethan e 8,600 16 ND U 1.0 0.42 0.21 ND U 1.0 0.42 0.21 0 ND U 1.0 0.42 0.21 Chlorofor m 70 2,400 ND U 1.0 0.14 0.07 ND U 1.0 0.14 0.07 0 ND U 1.0 0.14 0.07 Chloromethane 1.8 50,000 ND U 1.0 0.62 0.31 ND U 1.0 0.62 0.31 0 ND U 1.0 0.62 0.31cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene (cis1,2-Dichloroethene) 70 50,000 ND U 1.0 0.32 0.16 ND U 1.0 0.32 0.16 0 ND U 1.0 0.32 0.16 Dibromochloromethane (Chlorodibromomethane) 0.16 50,000 ND U 1.0 b 0.38 0.19 ND U 1.0 b 0.38 0.19 0 ND U 1.0 b 0.38 0.19 Ethylbenzen e 700 30 ND U 1.0 0.46 0.23 ND U 1.0 0.46 0.23 0 ND U 1.0 0.46 0.23 Hexachlorobutadien e 0.86 6 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 0 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 7,100 8,400 ND U 10.0 1.20 0.60 ND U 10.0 1.20 0.60 0 ND U 10.0 1.20 0.60 Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-Methyl-2-pentanone) 2,000 1,300 ND U 10.0 3.80 1.90 ND U 10.0 3.80 1.90 0 ND U 10.0 3.80 1.90 Methyl tert-butyl Ethe r 12 5 ND U 1.0 0.52 0.26 ND U 1.0 0.52 0.26 0 ND U 1.0 0.52 0.26 Methylene chlorid e 4.8 9,100 ND U 5.0 0.70 0.35 ND U 5.0 0.70 0.35 0 ND U 5.0 0.70 0.35 Styrene 100 10 ND U 1.0 0.50 0.25 ND U 1.0 0.50 0.25 0 ND U 1.0 0.50 0.25 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- 0.52 50,000 ND U 1.0 0.26 0.13 ND U 1.0 0.26 0.13 0 ND U 1.0 0.26 0.13 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 0.067 500 ND U 1.0 b 0.20 0.10 ND U 1.0 b 0.20 0.10 0 ND U 1.0 b 0.20 0.10 Tetrachloroethylene (Tetrachloroethene) 5 170 ND U 1.0 0.48 0.24 ND U 1.0 0.48 0.24 0 ND U 1.0 0.48 0.24 Toluen e 1,000 40 ND U 1.0 0.34 0.17 ND U 1.0 0.34 0.17 0 ND U 1.0 0.34 0.17 trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene (trans-1,2-Dichloroethene) 100 260 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 0 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 Trichloroethylene (Trichloroethene) 5 310 ND U 1.0 0.32 0.16 ND U 1.0 0.32 0.16 0 ND U 1.0 0.32 0.16 Vinyl chlorid e 2 3,400 ND U 1.0 0.46 0.23 ND U 1.0 0.46 0.23 0 ND U 1.0 0.46 0.23 Xylene s 10,000 20 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 0 ND U 1.0 0.38 0.19 EPA 6020 Lead 15 5000 0.19 J 0.5 0.22 0.11 ND U 0.5 0.22 0.11 0 -- -- -- -- Notes:

dup - duplicate GRO - gasoline range organics

LOD - limit of detection LOQ - limit of quantitation or reporting limit (RL) PAHs - polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Q - data qualifier RPD - relative percent difference TPH - total petroleum hydrocarbons
VOC - volatile organic compound -- not analyzed - Chemical does not have DOH EALs. LODs will be included in the final report Bold - Result exceeds one or both DOH EALs. ES054 OWDFMW01 dup

EPA 8270D SIM (PAHs)

EPA 8260B (VOCs) ES056 DOH Groundwater Gross Contamination EALs a Method Chemical DOH Drinking Water EALs for Human Toxicity a

MADEP EPH

MADEP VPH

-- Result RPD Duplicate

(%)

U - Indicates the compound or analyte was analyzed for but not detected. The result is reported as ND. a DOH EALs (DOH, 2009): Table D-1b. Groundwater Action Levels (Groundwater is a current or potential drinking water resource; sur face water body is not located within 150 meters of release site).
b In the case where an EAL for a specific chemical is less than the LOQ for a commercial laboratory, it is generally acceptable t o consider the LOQ in place of the action level (DOH, Evaluation of Environmental Hazards at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater 2008, updated March 2009).

J - Estimated result. Indicates that the compound was identified but the concentration was above the DL and below the LOQ. DRO - diesel range organics DL - detection limit or method detection limit (MDL) All units are in micrograms per liter (μg/L)

. OWDFMW01 ES055

Result Result Trip Blank (10/26/2011)Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 3 Groundwater Analytical Results December 2011



### 3-6 This page is intentionally left blank.Table 3-3: Historical and Current Groundwater Sample Analytical Results, August 2009 through October 2011Result Q LOQ LOD DL Result Q LOQ LOD DL Result Q LOQ LOD DL Result Q LOQ LOD DLAugust 2009 ND U 457 NA 171 ND U 100 NA 30 -- -- -- NA -- -- -- -- NA --October 2009 ND U 444 NA 167 ND U 100 NA 30 ND U 494 NA 185 ND U 100 NA 30January 20101490440 NA 165 ND U 100 NA 30322J 460 NA 172 ND U 100 NA 30April 2010288J 471 NA 176 ND U 100 NA 30 ND U 471 NA 176 ND U 100 NA 30July 2010 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ND U 426 -- 160 ND U 100 -- 30October 2010 ND U 150 80.8 40.4 ND U 20.0 12.1 6.06 ND U 150 80.8 40.4 ND U 20.0 12.1 6.06January 2011 ND U 150 80.8 40.4 ND U 20.0 12.1 6.06 ND U 150 80.8 40.4 ND U 20.0 12.1 6.06April 2011 ND U 150 80.8 40.4 ND U 20.0 12.1 6.06 ND U 150 80.8 40.4 ND U 20.0 12.1 6.06July 2011 ND U 150 80.8 40.4 ND U 20.0 12.1 6.06 ND U 150 80.8 40.4 ND U 20.0 12.1 6.06October 2011 ND U 150 80.8 40.4 ND U 20.0 12.1 6.06 ND U 150 80.8 40.4 ND U 20.0 12.1 6.06Notes:DOH Drinking Water EALs for Human Toxicitya:TPH-DRO = 210 μg/L; TPH-GRO = 100 μg/LDOH Groundwater Gross Contamination EALsa: TPH-DRO = 100 μg/L; TPH-GRO = 100 μg/LaDOH EALs (DOH, 2009): Table D-1b. Groundwater Action Levels (Groundwater is a current or potential drinking water resource; surface water bodyTPH-DRO TPH-GROOWDFMW01 HDMW2253-03TPH-DRO TPH-GROBold - Result exceeds one or both DOH EALs.-- The monitoring well was not sampled.is not located within 150 meters of release site.)All units are in micrograms per liter (μg/L)U - Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. The result is reported as ND.ND - not detectedQ - data qualifierJ - Estimated result. Indicates that the compound was identified but the concentration was above the DL and below the LOQ.DL - detection limit or method detection limit (MDL)LOQ - limit of quantitation or reporting limit (RL)LOD - limit of detectionNA - not availableQuarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 3 Groundwater Analytical Results December 2011



### 3-8 This page is intentionally left blank.Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 4 Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations December 2011



### 4-1 

# Section 4 Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations
4.1 Summary
Dissolved lead was detected at a concentration of 0.9 μ g/L in monitoring well HDMW2253-03 and at an estimated concentration of 0.19 μ g/L in monitoring well OWDFMW01 during this groundwater monitoring event. These dissol ved lead concentrations are below the DOH Drinking Water EAL (15 μ g/L) and the DOH Gross Contamination EAL (5,000 μ g/L). Benzene was detected at an estimated concentration of 0.92 μ g/L in monitoring well HDMW2253-03 below the DOH Drinking Water EAL (5 μ g/L) and the DOH Gross Contamination EAL (170 μ g/L). No other COPCs were detected in monitoring wells HDMW 2253-03 and OWDFMW01 during the October 2011 monitoring event. Aliphatic hydrocarbons (C 19 

### -C 36 

### ) were detected at a concentration of 226 μ g/L in monitoring well HDMW2253-03 and at an estim ated concentration of 41.0 μ g/L at monitoring well OWDFMW01 during this groundwater monito ring event. Aliphatic hydrocarbons (C 9 

### -C 12 

### ) were detected at an estimated concentration (13.8 μ g/L) in monitoring well OWDFMW01. 

# 4.2 Conclusions Concentrations of PAHs and VOCs were previ ously not detected above the EALs during the August 2009, October 2009, January 2010, April 2010, July 2010, October 2010, January 2011, April 2011, and July 2011 ground water monitoring events. P AHs and VOCs were also not detected above the EALs during this monitoring ev ent. An estimated co ncentration of benzene was detected during this monitoring event. The data continue to suggest that TPH-DRO was the only COPC present in any notable quantity for the site; however, it has been non-detect for at least the past five monitoring events. TPH-DRO concentrations in OWDFMW01 signi ficantly decreased from January 2010 (1,490 μ g/L) to April 2010 (288 μ g/L), and were not detected in the subsequent five monitoring events (Table 3-1 and Table 3-3). The concentratio ns of TPH-DRO at HDM W2253-03 have decreased to non-detectable levels for the previous seve n consecutive quarterly monitoring events. The data suggest that TPH-DRO concentrations are attenuating naturally at the two outside wells.
The October 2010 detection of acetone at an es timated concentration below the DOH Drinking Water EAL was the first at monitoring well OWDF MW01. Acetone was also detected at an estimated concentration in the trip blank sample in October 2010. Acetone was not detected in the subsequent four monitoring events. This st rongly suggests that acetone was introduced to the samples during transport to and from the laborat ory. The October 2010 detection of acetone is not representative of groundwater at OWDFMW01.
The October 2010 detections of lead at conc entrations below the DOH Drinking Water EAL were the first at these two monitoring we lls (OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03). Lead was not detected in any samples during the January 201 1 monitoring event or during the April 2011Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 4 Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations December 2011



### 4-2 monitoring event. Lead was detected at esti mated concentrations below the DOH Drinking Water EAL at both monitoring we lls during the July 2011 monitoring event. Lead was detected in monitoring well HDMW2253-03 at a concentr ation below the DOH Drinking Water EAL and in monitoring well OWDFMW01 at an estima ted concentration below the DOH Drinking Water EAL during this October 2011 monitoring event. The January 2011 detection of benzene at an es timated concentration be low the DOH Drinking Water EAL in monitoring well OWDFMW01 was the first at this monitoring well. Benzene was again detected only in the duplicate sample fr om OWDFMW01 at an es timated concentration below the DOH Drinking Water EAL during the Apri l 2011 monitoring event. Benzene was not detected in monitoring well OWDFMW01 in the July 2011 monitoring event and during this October 2011 monitoring event. The April 2011 detections of xylenes and toluene in OWDFMW01 and benzene in HDMW2253-03 at estimated concentrations below the DOH Drinking Water EALs were the first at these monitoring wells. Xylenes, toluene and benzene were non-det ect in both monitoring wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03 in the July 2011 monitoring event. Benzene was detected at an estimated concentration be low the DOH Drinking Water EAL in HDMW2253-03 during this October 201 1 monitoring event. MADEP EPH analytical results for TPH-DRO typical ly have the majority of the hydrocarbons in the C 10 

### -C 20 

### range. Current analytical results have the majority of the hydrocarbons toward the higher carbon range (C 19 

### -C 36 

### ) which indicate that the detected hydrocarbons are most likely from non-petroleum sources. 

# 4.3 Recommendations
All COPC concentrations have been below the EALs for five and seven consecutive quarterly monitoring events for sample s collected at monitoring wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03, respectively. Reduced frequency of sampling from quarterly to annua l groundwater monitoring of both monitoring wells is recommended.Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 5 References December 2011



### 5-1 

# Section 5 References

AMEC Earth and Enviro nmental, Inc., 2002. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Investigation Report, Prepared for NAVFAC Pacific . August. Dawson Group, Inc., 2006. Fourth Quarter 2005 Groundwater Sampling Report, Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Hawa ii. February. DOH, 2009. Evaluation of Environmental Hazards at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater . Updated March 2009. DON, 2007. Project Procedures Manual, U.S. Navy Environmental Rest oration Program, NAVFAC Pacific . February. Earth Tech, Inc, 2000. Remedial Investigation Phase II, Volu me I, Technical Report, Red Hill Oily Waste Disposal Faci lity, Halawa, Oahu, Hawaii . September. Environet, 2010. Work Plan, Long-Term Monitoring, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i . September. Hawai‘i Administrative Rules, Ti tle 11, Chapter 281, Subchapter 7. TEC, 2006. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Fi nal - Addendum Planning Documents, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii . May. _____, 2008. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Fi nal Groundwater Protection Plan, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii . January 2008 revised in December 2009. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) , 2005. Aerial Image. http ://hawaii.wr.usgs.gov/index.html.Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, JBPHH, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i Section 5 References December 2011



### 5-2 This page is intentionally left blank.

# Appendix A DOH Correspondence

# Appendix B Field Notebook

# Appendix C Groundwater Sampling LogsWELL ID: LOCATION: PROJECT NO:

INITIAL WATER LEVEL: DATE: TIME:

TOTAL DEPTH OF WELL: PERSONNEL INVOLVED:

LENGTH OF SATURATED ZONE: WEATHER CONDITIONS:

VOLUME OF WATER TO BE REMOVED: METHOD OF REMOVAL:

WATER LEVEL AFTER PURGING: PUMPING RATE:

WELL PURGE DATA: TIME VOLUME REMOVED pH COND (S/m) TURBIDITY ( NTU ) DO (mg/l) TEMP ( o C) SALINITY ( % ) REDOX (ORP) ( mV ) 1423 3 L 11.13 3.10 30.0 7.99 26.06 1.6 -59 1426 6 L 11.20 3.16 28.8 5.63 24.79 1.6 -61 1436 9 L 11.19 3.16 37.0 5.08 24.63 1.6 -49 1439 12 L 11.19 3.20 28.1 4.95 24.18 1.7 -49 1441 14L 11.16 3.20 37.5 6.61 24.00 1.7 -45

SAMPLE RETRIEVAL METHOD: APPEARANCE OF SAMPLE: COLOR none SAMPLE ID: TURBIDITY none SAMPLE COLLECTION TIME: SEDIMENT none SAMPLED BY: OTHER none

COMMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS: PID = 0.3 ppm Collected Duplicate ES056

LABORATORY ANALYSIS PARAMETERS AND PRESERVATIVES: TPH-GRO (EPA 8260B) & VOCs (EPA 8260B) with no preservative

TPH-DRO (EPA8015B) & PAHs (EPA 8270C SIM) with no preservative, and dissolved lead (EPA 6020) with nitric acid preservative, MA DEP (VPH and EPH) with hydrocloric acid preservative NUMBER AND TYPES OF SAMPLE CONTAINERS FILLED:

DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES: SAMPLES DELIVERED TO: TRANSPORTERS: SAMPLE DELIVERY DATE: SAMPLE DELIVERY TIME:

CAPACITY OF CASING (GALLONS/LINEAR FOOT) 2"-0.16; 4"-0.65; 6"-1.47; 8"-2.61; 10"-4.08; 12"-5.87 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG
OWDFMW01 Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 1022-024

120.12 feet bTOC 10/26/2011 1407

142.8 feet bTOC SF, SK 22.68 feet Sunny w/ wind

N/A 4" bailer

10/27/2011 1400 122.60 feet bTOC N/A

4" bailer, 2" bailer

ES055
1445 SF, SK

Primary: (7) - 40 mL VOAs, (5) - 1 L amber bottle, (1) - 500 mL polyethylene bottle, Duplicate: (7) - 40 mL VOAs, (5) - 1 L amber bottle, (1) - 500 mL polyethylene bottle, and MS/MSD: (21) - mL VOAs, (15) - 1 L amber bottle, (3) - 500 mL polyethylene bottle

Alconox, triple rinse with distilled water APPL, Inc. JTWELL ID: LOCATION: PROJECT NO:

INITIAL WATER LEVEL: DATE: TIME:

TOTAL DEPTH OF WELL: PERSONNEL INVOLVED:

LENGTH OF SATURATED ZONE: WEATHER CONDITIONS:

VOLUME OF WATER TO BE REMOVED: METHOD OF REMOVAL:

WATER LEVEL AFTER PURGING: PUMPING RATE:

WELL PURGE DATA: TIME VOLUME REMOVED pH COND ( mS/cm ) TURBIDITY ( NTU ) DO (mg/l) TEMP ( o C) SALINITY (pp t ) REDOX (ORP) ( mV ) 1015 3 L 6.21 0.411 36.9 10.40 24.81 0.2 -28 1020 7 L 6.96 0.444 44.1 1.77 23.34 0.2 -29 1027 11 L 6.95 0.439 42.2 3.29 22.77 0.2 -151 1034 15 L 6.92 0.435 55.4 4.00 22.62 0.2 -158

SAMPLE RETRIEVAL METHOD: APPEARANCE OF SAMPLE: COLOR Gray SAMPLE ID: TURBIDITY None SAMPLE COLLECTION TIME: SEDIMENT Lots of suspended sediment SAMPLED BY: OTHER None

COMMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS: PID = 0.0 ppm

LABORATORY ANALYSIS PARAMETERS AND PRESERVATIVES: TPH-GRO (EPA 8260B) & VOCs (EPA 8260B) with no preservative

TPH-DRO (EPA8015B) & PAHs (EPA 8270C SIM) with no preservative, and dissolved lead (EPA 6020) with nitric acid preservative, M ADEP (VPH and EPH) with hydrocloric acid

NUMBER AND TYPES OF SAMPLE CONTAINERS FILLED:

DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES: SAMPLES DELIVERED TO: TRANSPORTERS: SAMPLE DELIVERY DATE: SAMPLE DELIVERY TIME:

CAPACITY OF CASING (GALLONS/LINEAR FOOT) 2"-0.16; 4"-0.65; 6"-1.47; 8"-2.61; 10"-4.08; 12"-5.87 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG
HDMW2253-03 Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 1022-024

20 7.73 feet bTOC 10/26/2011 0957
1,575 feet bTOC SF, SK

N/A Sunny

N/A 4" bailer

10/27/2011 1400 N/A N/A

4" bailer

ES053
1043 SF, SK

(7) - 40 mL VOAs, (5) - 1 L amber bottle, (1) - 500 mL polyethylene bottle

Alconox, triple rinse with distilled water APPL, Inc. JT

# Appendix D Laboratory Analytical Results, October 2011 (on CD-ROM)