alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
119 STAT. 344 PUBLIC LAW 109–19—JULY 1, 2005

Public Law 109–19

109th Congress

An Act

To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant program

through September 30, 2005, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TANF Extension Act of 2005’’.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY

FAMILIES BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2005.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Activities authorized by part A of title IV

of the Social Security Act, and by sections 510, 1108(b), and 1925

of such Act, shall continue through September 30, 2005, in the

manner authorized for fiscal year 2004, notwithstanding section

1902(e)(1)(A) of such Act, and out of any money in the Treasury

of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby

appropriated such sums as may be necessary for such purpose.

Grants and payments may be made pursuant to this authority

through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005 at the level provided

for such activities through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004.

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 403(a)(3)(H)(ii) of the

Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(3)(H)(ii)) is amended by

striking ‘‘June 30’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30’’.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL RANDOM SAMPLE STUDY OF

CHILD WELFARE AND CHILD WELFARE WAIVER

AUTHORITY THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2005.

Activities authorized by sections 429A and 1130(a) of the Social

Security Act shall continue through September 30, 2005, in the

manner authorized for fiscal year 2004, and out of any money

in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated,

there are hereby appropriated such sums as may be necessary

for such purpose. Grants and payments may be made pursuant

to this authority through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005

42 USC 1305

note.

TANF Extension

Act of 2005.

July 1, 2005

[H.R. 3021]

PUBLIC LAW 109–19—JULY 1, 2005 119 STAT. 345

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3021:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

June 29, considered and passed House.

June 30, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

at the level provided for such activities through the fourth quarter

of fiscal year 2004.

Approved July 1, 2005.
#### Salvatore Puma, Appellant, v. Southern Pacific Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131157 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131157 

 COA: 258740 

Calhoun CC: 01-000081-FC 

LARRY TERRILL CAVER, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 21, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0918 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 26, 2006 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-4901-N-02]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

January 9, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark Johnston, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: December 30, 2003.

John D. Garrity,

Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.

[FR Doc. 04-234 Filed 1-8-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
US EPWERD Washington DC 

Mining Facilities in Region 8 States - 

INDIVIDUAL AND GENERAL PERMITS 

, Is , Climax Molybdenum Company ( cgaooo230 . , , . " <,,,, % .>, ,.,,, as, , >,, .,,$ . . , 106'l , . . I 

COO000248 . ,. > Climax Molybdenum ,, Company . .. 1061 . , , ,,, , % .,,"-"w,m---.F.-- . .. .. . 

' .C~0000591 ,, . , Resurrection . . - . . , . Mining . Cornpacy . . , , , , . Io3l . . . .- *,, .. %. a-ua >%>, % 

- , COO001244 . - Cotter Corpora$? , , ..... . , ,, 1094 ,,,,.., ,$ ,,.,.., -.m,...,---,* "yv . -. . - . 

,COO022750 a .*, >s ,,.,., ,,, , Homestake Mining Co of ,> California ">. n1094 , .. \ v,..L.-.-v, ,w.wwvv, %- , v ... 

' COO024562 ,Cripple , Creek ,, %, and Victor Gold Mining Co ,1041 ." ,, .~.vms,,-.~. 

' COO02701 4 Leach'!1'? ??P??!on % +, , .% . . , % 

- , COO032751 >, % %, , $,% , *, Calais Resources Inc , !MI , A . La..u *,., . , .I 

! 

COO035394 US EnergyICrested Corp 1031 . .. 4s > . . . 

COO036251 . $, ,, , Cotter Corporation 1094 ... --.,.- ,. 

COO037206 . . I Walker ,,,,>$, Rhby *, , Mining ~ ,, , Company Inc 1041 - % ." . ,- ,a,,w , , 

Lon'don Mine LLC , ' nC0!?038334, , ,, ,.,. >, ., . . , . . . .. .. , .> , ,, 1041 ,--_ ._.._ .--" , . . 

' COOW1467 ,, ,., , , , ,,, C!imax,,M~l~.bc!e?~'? Co.mpa?~ . . . ... - . . .. . !TI.. . .%- ..- -_.,,._,.v.s-,.,,., ,, ,., ,,,, ,,,, 

COO041 548 .. > ,* , . US Department of EnerpyISM Stoller Corp 1094 , \ \ .. ,.". ,,,,",., , , ,.< , 

COO043168 I Hunter Gold Mining Inc ,,.,, ,,, ,,,,,, >...,. .,,,%,, ,,.,,,.$ <"<,,.. ,,,, $, , ,, ,. ,,, >, , , " ., . 1041 . . . ,.* < . .. .. -.%*,.A"* "".M".,%< .. . 8, % * 

COO043648 

\,,. %>...$,, ,. ' Cripple Creek and Victor Gold Mining Company 1941. , , ,--, , . , A , , , a, <,,<,\, > , 

coo043753 , ., ,'savage Mi!,i%,.i?~! Oi!Campany !F , , 1021 , ,., ., -,5,-v.,,,. .,w , , , 

COO045209 

.. . . Prairie Center Metropolitan District 1 > . 1041 , , , % $,. ,,,- ,,.,, ,... .w... wk..s, , a> *,% , 

COO046540 Cripple Creek and Victor Gold Mining Co ,., , , , ... % ,< ,. , ,. . . ,*' . -.-". -- -. . - .,." . . , 

COOOdS?31~, , , , . ~ee* WF?? a?d wmrnwrp , 1099 , , , . .,*,. ,- ,.,v.., .. -, % ,. . , , ,, , 

' COO047562 Energy Fuels Resources COQ , . log4.. . ,.-, -..-.---. . .% . . . . ' 

COG6001 81 New Fields Inc 1061 , ,,.,,. 

COG600703 . > The Turquoise Co 1041 . ,. ,.. . 

, COG600769 

>.>%a .%. Boulder Cnty Park and Open Space Dept 1941 ... .\I _* . ._ -.. 

MT0000 191 MONTANA RESOURCES 1021 , tl,,l.l,,%,l. 5 ,,">l 

MT0024716 ,, , STILLWATER . . MINING C0,MPANY . . 1021 , ,,-. .- ......%. < < 

STILLWATER . . MINING CO. (E.B.P.) > -, , , , <
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23301]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 12, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. Palmetto Heritage Bancshares, Inc., Pawleys Island, South 
Carolina; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of 
the voting shares of Palmetto Heritage Bank & Trust, Pawleys Island, 
South Carolina, an organizing bank.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Patrick Wilder, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Rural Bancshares of Wisconsin, Inc., Fennimore, Wisconsin; to 
become a bank holding company by acquiring 80 percent of the voting 
shares of LSB Holding Company, Livingston, Wisconsin, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Livingston State Bank, Livingston, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 13, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-23301 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```
#### § 206.7 Implementation of assistance from other Federal agencies.

All directives, known as mission assignments, to other Federal agencies shall be in writing, or shall be confirmed in writing if made orally, and shall identify the specific task to be performed and the requirements or criteria to be followed. If the Federal agency is to be reimbursed, the letter will also contain a dollar amount which is not to be exceeded in accomplishing the task without prior approval of the issuing official.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 19, 2015 106859 

________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

NEW YORK,

Respondent,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NICHOLAS C. PANDORI,

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: October 19, 2015

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Rose, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________

Linda A. Berkowitz, Saratoga Springs, for appellant.

M. Elizabeth Coreno, Special Prosecutor, Saratoga Springs,

for respondent.

__________

Rose, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga

County (Scarano, J.), rendered May 13, 2014, convicting defendant

upon his plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the

third degree.

Defendant waived indictment, pleaded guilty to a superior

court information charging him with grand larceny in the third

degree and waived his right to appeal. County Court thereafter

sentenced him to five years of probation. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Initially, we reject defendant's contention

that his waiver of the right to appeal was invalid. Both County

Court and the written waiver informed him of the separate and

distinct nature of the right to appeal, and County Court
-2- 106859 

confirmed that defendant had discussed the waiver with counsel

and understood its ramifications. Therefore, we conclude that

defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the

right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see People v

Fligger, 117 AD3d 1343, 1344 [2014], lv denied 23 NY3d 1061

[2014]; People v Chavis, 117 AD3d 1193, 1193-1194 [2014]). 

Although defendant's remaining claim – that his plea was not

voluntarily entered due to the ineffective assistance of counsel

– survives his appeal waiver, it is unpreserved for our review as

the record does not reflect that he made an appropriate

postallocution motion (see People v Smith, 119 AD3d 1088, 1089

[2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 1089 [2014]; People v Livziey, 117 AD3d

1341, 1342 [2014]). To the extent that his claim addresses

matters outside the record, they are more properly the subject of

a CPL article 440 motion (see People v Stroman, 107 AD3d 1023,

1025 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1046 [2013]; People v Planty, 85

AD3d 1317, 1318 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 820 [2011]).

McCarthy, J.P., Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 15.5








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-156686) of our report dated April 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Magic Software Enterprises Ltd., included in this annual report of on Form 20-F of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2009.




Tel- Aviv, Israel
/s/ Kost, Forer, Gabbay & KaisererApril 27, 2010
KOST, FORER, GABBAY & KAISERERA Member of Ernst & Young Global
R-III 99-45

October 22, 1999

NRC ISSUES ORDER BARRING KEWAUNEE SECURITY TRAINING MANAGER

FROM TAKING PART IN NRC-LICENSED ACTIVITIES FOR THREE YEARS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued an order

barring a contract security training manager at the Kewaunee

nuclear power plant from taking part in NRC-licensed activities

for three years. In addition, the manager will be required to

notify the agency of any participation in NRC-licensed work for

three years after the prohibition period ends.

The action stems from an investigation by the NRC Office

of Investigations (OI) at the Kewaunee facility, which is located

in Kewaunee, Wis., and operated by Wisconsin Public Service Corp.

On October 14, 1998, Wisconsin Power reported to the NRC that it

had received information indicating the NRC-required annual testfiring of shotguns used by the plant security force had not been

performed. (The NRC requires the annual test-firing of all onsite firearms, as well as the documentation of those results.)

NRC investigators, during a review conducted from

December 21, 1998, to June 21, subsequently determined that 11

shotguns were not tested in 1997 and nine in 1998. Further,

NRC’s OI found that the security training manager, who is

employed by the Wackenhut Corp., deliberately falsified the

records for those tests and provided false information to the

plant’s security director during Wisconsin Power’s own

investigation of the matter.

The NRC noted that Wisconsin Power has taken several

steps to prevent a recurrence, including reviewing other work

performed by the individual, taking disciplinary action against

the individual and revising procedures to require additional

oversight and verification of the annual testing of all firearms.

However, because the company, as the plant’s licensed

operator, is responsible for the actions of all workers at the

site, the NRC is issuing a Notice of Violation to Wisconsin

Power.

The manager has 20 days to request a hearing on the

order.
#
**EXHIBIT32**

**Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Eastern American Natural Gas Trust (the “Trust”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of theTrust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Trust at the dates and for the periods presented.

The abovecertification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q oras a separate disclosure document.
|        | The Bank of New  York Trust Company, N.A., Trustee, |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Trustee for  Eastern American Natural Gas Trust     |
|   |                                                |
|   |                                                |
|        | By:                                                 | /s/ | Mike Ulrich |   |
|   |                                                | Vice President |
|   |                                                | The Bank of New  York Trust Company, N.A., Trustee |

 

Date:  November 8, 2006

1

----
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  /s/ Norman Bracht                                                     |
| Norman Bracht                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| May 24, 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.131 Circumstances in which applicable.

The provisions of §§ 10.131 through 10.139 are applicable in those circumstances in which the rate of duty applicable to merchandise is dependent upon actual use, unless there is a specific provision in this part which governs the treatment of the merchandise. However, specific marking or certification requirements, such as those for bolting cloths in section 10.58, may be applicable to merchandise subject to the provisions of sections 10.131-10.139.

[T.D. 71-139, 36 FR 10726, June 2, 1971, as amended by T.D. 86-118, 51 FR 22515, June 20, 1986]
#### § 209.9 Appeals.

The State may appeal any decision that we make regarding projects submitted for funding in the Supplemental Property Acquisition and Elevation Assistance program. The State must submit the appeal in writing to the Regional Administrator and must include documentation that justifies the request for reconsideration. The appeal must specify the monetary figure in dispute and the provisions in Federal law, regulation, or policy with which the appellant believes the initial action was inconsistent. The applicant must appeal within 60 days of the applicant's receipt of our funding decision. The State must forward any appeal from an applicant or subgrantee with a written recommendation to the Regional Administrator within 60 days of receipt. Within 90 days following the receipt of an appeal, the Regional Administrator will notify the State in writing as to the new decision or the need for more information.
Transport Airplane Directorate

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W.

Renton, Washington 98057-3356

July 28, 2016

Due to a lack of response to a letter sent to AeroMedical on June 23, 2016, this docket is 

closed until further action on the part of the petitioner.
2

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Doug Ostgaard, 425-227-2253, doug.ostgaard@faa.gov.

Sincerely,

Franklin Tiangsing

Manager, Airframe and Cabin Safety Branch

Transport Standards Staff

Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service
§ 109.510 Reviews. ( a ) *General.* SBA may conduct reviews and monitoring of ILP Intermediaries, including ILP Intermediaries' self-assessments. SBA may also perform reviews of ILP Intermediaries as needed, as determined by SBA in its discretion.
( b ) *Corrective actions.* SBA may require an ILP Intermediary to take corrective actions to address findings from reviews. Failure to take required corrective actions may constitute an event of default, as described in § 109.520(c).
( c ) *Confidentiality of reports.* Review reports and other SBA prepared review related documents are subject to the confidentiality requirements of § 120.1060.
[82 FR 39501, Aug. 21, 2017]