alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-61229-RAR

JOEL ALCIDES RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

SONIA QUIÑONES, in her official capacity 

as Chief of the Hallandale Police Department, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 

[ECF No. 38] (“Notice”), filed on December 21, 2020. The Court having reviewed the Notice, the

record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The 

Clerk is instructed to mark this case CLOSED, and any pending motions are DENIED AS 

MOOT. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 22nd day of December, 2020.

 

_________________________________

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-61229-RAR Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2020 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-cv-61241-RUIZ

APRIL HICKS, 

Plaintiff,

v.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT TYRONE EUGENE HILTON’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT [D.E. 16]

Plaintiff, APRIL HICKS (“Plaintiff’), by and through undersigned counsel files this Response 

to Defendant Tyrone Eugene Hilton’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint [D.E. 16], and 

states as follows:

1. The United States of America (“USA”) admits in its original Answer [D.E. 15] to 

the Complaint that “Tyrone Eugene Hilton . . . was acting in the scope of his federal employment 

at the time of the [crash] on June 24, 2018.” See [D.E. 15 p. 2 ¶ 5]. 

2. After admitting that Tyrone Eugene Hilton was in the course and scope of his 

employment at the time of the crash, the parties agreed in writing on a First Amended Complaint 

[D.E. 17] rendering the Motion to Dismiss [D.E. 16] as moot.

Continued on Next Page

Case 0:20-cv-61241-RAR Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/26/2021 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that the Court deny the Motion to Dismiss [D.E. 16] 

as moot.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 26, 2021

By: s/Matthew Sean Tucker

Matthew Sean Tucker

Florida Bar No. 90047

Tucker Law

200 SE 6TH Street, Suite 405

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: (954) 204-0444

Facsimile: (954) 358-4946

Matt@TuckerUp.com

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 26, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF and that service was perfected on all counsel of record 

and interested parties through this system.

By: s/Matthew Sean Tucker

Service List:

Monica L. Haddad Forbes

Assistant United States Attorney

Florida Bar No. 99426

Email: Monica.Forbes@usdoj.gov

U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Florida

500 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Telephone: (561) 209-1004

Attorney for Defendant United States of America

Case 0:20-cv-61241-RAR Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/26/2021 Page 2 of 2
§ 108.2006 Evaluation and selection of SSBICs. SBA will evaluate and select an SSBIC for an Operational Assistance grant award under the NMVC program solely at SBA's discretion, based on SBA's review of the SSBIC's application materials, interviews or site visits with the SSBIC (if any), and information in SBA's records relating to the SSBIC's regulatory compliance status and track record as an SSBIC. SBA's evaluation and selection process is intended to ensure that SSBIC requests are evaluated on a competitive basis and in a fair and consistent manner. SBA will evaluate and select SSBICs for an Operational Assistance grant award by considering the following criteria: ( a ) The strength of the SSBIC's application, including the strength of its proposal to provide Operational Assistance to Smaller Enterprises in which it intends to invest;
( b ) The SSBIC's regulatory compliance status and past track record in being able to accomplish program goals through its investment activity;
( c ) The likelihood that and the time frame within which the SSBIC will be able to raise the Regulatory Capital it intends to raise and obtain the matching resources described in § 108.2005(b) and (g);
( d ) The need for Low-Income Investments in the LI Areas in which the SSBIC intends to invest;
( e ) The SSBIC's demonstrated understanding of the markets in the LI Areas in which it intends to invest;
( f ) The extent to which the activities proposed by the SSBIC will promote economic development and the creation of wealth and job opportunities in the LI Areas in which it intends to invest and among individuals living in LI Areas;
( g ) The likelihood that the SSBIC will fulfill the goals described in its application and meet the objectives of the NMVC program; and
( h ) The strength of the SSBIC's application compared to applications submitted by other SSBICs and by Applicants intending to invest in the same or proximate LI Areas.
[67 FR 68503, Nov. 12, 2002]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****FY ... annual report**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc:ID 1.27:T 15/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000636119
 
October 31, 2017
### **CHAPTER 1—ELECTION OF SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES**

Sec.
1.
Time for election of Senators.
1a.
Election to be certified by governor.
1b.
Countersignature of certificate of election.
2.
Omitted.
2a.
Reapportionment of Representatives; time and manner; existing decennial census figures as basis; statement by President; duty of clerk.
2b.
Number of Representatives from each State in 78th and subsequent Congresses.
2c.
Number of Congressional Districts; number of Representatives from each District.
3, 4.
Omitted.
5.
Nominations for Representatives at large.
6.
Reduction of representation.
7.
Time of election.
8.
Vacancies.
9.
Voting for Representatives.
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

3 February 2006

(2006/C 29/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-263 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, December 15, 1999)

NRC CERTIFIES WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY’S

AP600 REACTOR DESIGN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has amended its regulations to certify the

AP600 standard plant design developed by Westinghouse Electric Company. The certification

is the third issued under the agency’s new licensing process for standard design certification

and is valid for 15 years.

The AP600 design is for a nuclear power plant that is capable of producing

600 megawatts of electricity. The plant, which can be assembled from modular components,

features enhanced safety systems that rely on gravity and pressure differentials to safely shut

down the reactor or mitigate the effects of an accident. It is designed for a 60-year operating

life.

With the certification, a utility that wishes to build and operate a new nuclear power plant

can choose to use the design and reference it in a license application. Safety issues within the

scope of the certified design are not subject to litigation, although site-specific environmental

impacts associated with building and operating the plant at a particular location are.

Applicants for a license can make plant-specific changes to portions of the AP600

standard design by following the procedures set out in the design certification rule. The

applicant is required to maintain records of all such changes.

In the fall of 1998, the agency issued a final design approval for the Westinghouse

AP600 plant, completing the staff’s technical review of the application for design certification

received in 1992. This step permitted the staff to begin the administrative, or rulemaking,

phase.

No application for a license using the AP600 standard design has been filed with the

agency.

This rule will become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.

The public had been invited to submit comments on the proposed design certification

rule, the AP600 design control document submitted by Westinghouse that was incorporated

into the agency rule, and the environmental assessment of the AP600 design. Interested
parties also had the opportunity to request an informal hearing. No requests for hearings were

received and the submitted comment was of a general nature.

For additional information on the design’s certification, contact Jerry N. Wilson,

at 301-415-3145, or e-mail: jnw@nrc.gov.

###
##### 



Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

To the Partners of
TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
on Form S-3 (No. 333-110207) of TEPPCO
Partners, L.P. of our report dated February 12, 2004, related to the
consolidated financial statements of TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited
Partnership, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003 filed on February 27, 2004.



| | KPMG LLP
| | --------

Houston,
Texas
February 27, 2004
From: Torr, Graham [mailto:GrahamT@havilandusa.com] 

Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:40 PM

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: RE: ST reduction Agents / PFOS etc.

The old PFOS products generally sold for approx. the same price ..(give or take)...but they lasted much 

longer in solution. Typically 2-4 times as long (approx.).

All products are used based on their ability to maintain surface tension and their withstand breakdown 

in what is essentially a hostile environment (CrVI) rather than usage through amp hours.

GT 

From: Hancy, Cindy Wang [mailto:chancy@rti.org] 

Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:17 PM

To: Torr, Graham

Subject: RE: ST reduction Agents / PFOS etc.

Graham, 

Thanks again for sending this information. I have just a few more questions. I know it is difficult to figure 

out an estimate of cost per unit of production (e.g. dollar per amp hour) but if you have any estimate of 

this it would be great. Also, did Haviland at any point sell PFOS based wetting agents? If so, is there any 

way I could get that pricing even if it is out of date? Have a wonderful weekend. 

Thanks, 

Cindy Wang Hancy

RTI International

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541-6623

Fax: (919) 316-3420

From: Torr, Graham [mailto:GrahamT@havilandusa.com] 

Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 1:14 PM

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: RE: ST reduction Agents / PFOS etc.

Cindy,

We currently don’t offer any truly “PFOS” material. The Chrome Mist Eliminator II is a C6 product which 

means that it is less stable (and therefore more desirable from a health / environmental 

standpoint)....and the ne CRV1 Is a C4 material.

That being said, the Mist Eliminator II runs at about $100.00 / gal and the CRV1 (once approved by the 

EPA) will be available for approx. $130.00 / gal.

Samples of both currently available for testing.

Regards,

1
From: Hancy, Cindy Wang [mailto:chancy@rti.org] 

Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 12:15 PM

To: Torr, Graham

Subject: RE: ST reduction Agents / PFOS etc.

Graham, 

Thanks so much for sending this. What we are essentially trying to do is compare costs between PFOS 

and non-PFOS based mist eliminators. We are looking for the cost of the HPC Chrome Mist Eliminator II 

and any PFOS based mist eliminator Haviland sells in terms of dollars/amp hour or whatever unit you 

may have available. Is there any way you could send me this information?

Thanks, 

Cindy Wang Hancy

RTI International

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541-6623

Fax: (919) 316-3420

From: Torr, Graham [mailto:GrahamT@havilandusa.com] 

Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 11:58 AM

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: ST reduction Agents / PFOS etc.

Hi Cindy,

I have attached the TDS for our “C6” material but also an introduction to our new “C4” material (as is 

explained). We are very excited about this product and are happy to make material available to you for 

testing etc.

Thank you for your interest.

2

4
5
6
Licenced Device (GL) reporting requirements of 10 CFR 32.52 (a) and (b). Our review and 

comments are in response to the State’s request for Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 

evaluation of the license conditions that incorporated the amendment identified on the States 

Regulation Status Data Sheet (SRS). These license conditions were reviewed by comparison 

to the equivalent NRC rules in 10 CFR 32.52 and the requirements of the one amendment 

identified in the enclosed SRS. We discussed our review of the regulations with Joe Klinger on 

March 8, 2004. 

As a result of our review, we have no comments, however we would like to ensure that it is 

understood that the remaining portion of the GL Rule was due for Agreement State adoption on 

February 16, 2004. Please note t
GL)
Exhibit 99.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Duane Reade Inc. (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



|Dated: May 12, 2003 |  |  | /s/ANTHONY J. CUTIAnthony J. Cuti Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|------------------- |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Duane Reade Inc. and will be retained by Duane Reade Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Duane Reade Inc. (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



|Dated: May 12, 2003 |  |  | /s/JOHN K. HENRYJohn K. Henry Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|------------------- |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Duane Reade Inc. and will be retained by Duane Reade Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-202 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, September 21, 1999)

NRC ISSUES FINAL REVISIONS TO REGULATIONS

ON RESPIRATORY PROTECTION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending its regulations governing the

use of respiratory protection equipment and other controls to restrict internal exposure to

radioactive material.

The revised rules provide greater assurance that workers’ radiation exposures will be

maintained as low as is reasonably achievable, and approve for licensee use advances in

respiratory protection equipment and procedures. The new rules are more performancebased, more flexible and easier to implement. The NRC believes the new rules will save

licensees a total of about $1.5 million per year, with no reduction in worker health and safety.

When the Commission’s overall radiation protection regulations were significantly

revised in 1991, the rules for respiratory protection were not similarly revised because the

American National Standards Institute (ANSI) was working on a consensus standard in this

area. This standard, ANSI Z88.2-1992, “American National Standard Practice for Respiratory

Protection,” is now available and is essentially the technical basis for this rule. The

Commission’s rule is consistent with the general mandate of the Technology Transfer and

Advancement Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-113) to encourage Federal agencies to use

consensus standards. The new rules are also consistent with new respiratory protection

regulations published recently by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

The changes emphasize the use of process or engineering controls, decontamination of

work areas, access controls, and other procedures instead of the use of respiratory protection

devices, which tend to increase external radiation doses and worker stress.

The rules also recognize new respiratory protection devices that have been proven

effective, discourage the use of other devices that are now considered less effective based on

field tests, and revise requirements for respiratory protection procedures such as testing to

evaluate the fit of a respirator on a particular individual.
2

The rules also revise the “assigned protection factors” -- expected workplace levels of

respiratory protection that would be provided to properly fitted and trained users by using

properly functioning respirators--to be consistent with ANSI evaluations.

Further details of the final rules are contained in a Federal Register notice to be

published shortly.

#
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 566 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 42 Main Street in Slatersville, Rhode Island, 

as the ‘‘Specialist Matthew R. Turcotte Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 566 ES

1 SECTION 1. SPECIALIST MATTHEW R. TURCOTTE POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 42 Main Street in Slatersville, 

5 Rhode Island, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Spe6 cialist Matthew R. Turcotte Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Specialist Matthew 

11 R. Turcotte Post Office’’. 

Passed the Senate July 27, 2021. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 566 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostMatthew R. Turcotte Post Office’’. Slatersville, Rhode Island, as the ‘‘Specialist al Service located at 42 Main Street in
United States District Court 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA-MIAMI DIVISION 

ERIK CHAVEZ, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

GRILL ENTERPRISES, LLC, and 

RUBEN SIERRA, 

 Defendants. 

DEFENDANTS TRIAL WITNESS LIST 

CASE NO.: 1:20-CV-22603-GOODMAN 

[CONSENT CASE]

 PRESIDING JUDGE

HONORABLE 

JONATHAN GOODMAN

PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY 

Anthony F. Sanchez, Esq. 

DEFENDANTS’ ATTORNEYS 

Brian H. Pollock, Esq. 

Todd W. Shulby, Esq.

 TRIAL DATE(S) 

January 30, 2023 

 

 COURT REPORTER COURTROOM DEPUTY

PLF. NO DEF. NO. LIVE/TRANS TO BE CALLED BY WITNESSES 

 1 LIVE Plaintiff/Defendant Plaintiff, Erik Chavez 

 2 LIVE Plaintiff/Defendant Plaintiff, Leonel Diaz 

 3 LIVE Defendant Defendant, Ruben Sierra 

 4 LIVE Defendant Yeison Gonzalez 

 5 LIVE Defendant Cyndia Sanchez 

 6 LIVE Defendant Idelfonso Moreno 

 7 LIVE Defendant Jennifer Taksier 

 8 LIVE Defendant Mariana Pinto 

 9 LIVE Defendant Vanessa Carillo 

 10 LIVE Defendant Denysse Carillo 

 11 LIVE Defendant Cesar Pacheco 

12 LIVE Defendant Jaime Diaz 

13 LIVE Defendant Jose Romero 

14 LIVE Defendant Aliro J. Bazan 

15 LIVE Defendant Fabian Gonzalez 

16 LIVE Defendant Joao Nunes 

17 LIVE Defendant Rafael Reyes 

18 LIVE Defendant Augosto Proenza 

19 LIVE Defendant Manuel Mejias 

20 LIVE Defendant Manuel Mejias 

Case 1:20-cv-22603-JG Document 144-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/24/2023 Page 1 of 2
21 LIVE Defendant Gerardo Fernandez 

22 LIVE Defendant Miguel Nava 

23 LIVE Plaintiff All witnesses listed by Plaintiff 

24 LIVE Defendant All witnesses necessary for impeachment 

and/or rebuttal 

Defendants reserve the right to supplement this Trial Witness List. 

 Dated this 24th day of April 2023. 

s/ Todd W. Shulby, Esq. 

Todd W. Shulby, Esq. (068365) 

tshulby@shulbylaw.com 

llangford@shulbylaw.com 

TODD W. SHULBY, P.A. 

1792 Bell Tower Lane 

Weston, Florida 33326 

Tel.: 954-530-2236 

Counsel for Defendants 

 and 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq. 

Brian H. Pollock, Esq. (174742) 

brian@fairlawattorney.com 

FAIRLAW FIRM 

135 San Lorenzo Avenue 

Suite 770 

Coral Gables, FL 33146 

Tel: (305) 230-4884 

Co-Counsel for Defendants 

Case 1:20-cv-22603-JG Document 144-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/24/2023 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 55 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 55

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 
                        for Members of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2021

     Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself, Mr. Hawley, and Mr. Braun) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
        Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 
                        for Members of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF 
              CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 4501) is repealed.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--Section 601(a)(1) of such 
Act is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a)(1)'' and inserting ``(a)'';
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as 
        paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; and
            (3) by striking ``as adjusted by paragraph (2) of this 
        subsection'' and inserting ``adjusted as provided by law''.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section and the amendments made by this 
section shall take effect on the date on which the 118th Congress 
convenes.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear at 68 FR 51349, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 117.10 Review procedures. ( a ) SBA shall from time to time review the practices of recipients to determine whether they are complying with this part. As part of a compliance review or complaint investigation, SBA may require a recipient employing 15 or more full-time employees to complete a written self-evaluation, in a manner specified by the Agency, of any age distinction imposed in its program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
( b ) If a compliance review or pre-award review indicates a violation of the Act or these regulations, SBA will attempt to achieve voluntary compliance with the Act. If voluntary compliance with the recipient cannot be achieved, such recipient will be subject to the enforcement procedure contained in § 117.15 of these regulations. A refusal to permit an on-site compliance review during normal working hours may constitute noncompliance with this part.