alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23389]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Advisory Circular 23-23, Standardization Guide for Integrated 
Cockpits in Part 23 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of issuance of advisory circular.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the issuance of Advisory Circular (AC) 
23-23, Standardization Guide for Integrated Cockpits in Part 23 
Airplanes. The AC acknowledges the General Aviation Manufacturers 
Association (GAMA) Publication <greek-i>12, ``Recommended Practices and 
Guidelines for an Integrated Flightdeck/Cockpit in a 14 CFR Part 23 (or 
equivalent) Certificated Airplane,'' as an acceptable means for showing 
compliance with applicable requirements for electronic displays in part 
23 airplanes. The AC acknowledges a publication that was developed 
using a public process; therefore, we are issuing the AC in a final 
form.

DATES: The Manager of the Small Airplane Directorate issued Advisory 
Circular 23-23 on September 30, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Lowell Foster, Standards Office, 
ACE-111, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone 816-329-
4125.
    How to Obtain Copies: A paper copy of AC 23-23 may be obtained by 
writing to the U. S. Department of Transportation, Subsequent 
Distribution Office, DOT Warehouse, SVC-121.23, Ardmore East Business 
Center, 3341Q 75th Ave., Landover, MD 20785, telephone 301-322-5377, or 
by faxing your request to the warehouse at 301-386-5394. The AC will 
also be available on the Internet at http://www.airweb.faa.gov/AC.
    A copy of the GAMA Publication <greek-i>12 is available from GAMA. 
Their Web site is http://www.gama.aero. A combined industry and FAA 
team developed the GAMA publication.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on September 30, 2004.
Dorenda D. Baker,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 04-23389 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 7 -00 283 -CV

F r e ddie Le e Wa lke r , A ppe lla nt

v. Brad Livi ngston et al. , Appellees

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- GN-07- 0005 56 , HO NORAB LE ORLI NDA NARAN JO , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Ap pe lla nt F re dd ie L e e Wal ke r a

pp e a ls f ro m th e tr ia l c ou rt ’s or de r g ra nti ng a pp e lle e s’ mot ion to t ra ns fe r v e nu e fr om T ra

vis to B ra zor ia

County . B ut t

his Court is w ith ou t ju ri sd ic tio n to consider an i nterlocutory

appea l of an orde r transf

err ing ve nue. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Re m. Code Ann. §§ 15.064(a ) (West 2002) (“The court shall dete rmine venue questions from the plea dings a nd aff idavits. No interlocutory

appea l sha ll lie f

rom the dete rmination.”), 51.014 ( West S upp. 2006); Tex. R. C iv. P. 87(6) (re g arding trial court’ s venue determination, “[ t] here shall be no interloc utory
a pp e a l f ro m su c h d e te rm inatio n. ” ); se e als o Ame ric an Ho me Pr od s. Cor p. v . Clar k , 38 S.W .3d 92, 96 (T e x. 2 0 0 0 ) ( “ N e it

h e r th e c o u r t o f a

p p e a ls n o r th is Co u r t c a n r e v ie w th e p r o p r ie ty o f th e trial court’s ve nue dec ision.”). Acc ording ly , we dismiss the appea l for wa nt of jurisdiction.2 J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Jul y

18, 2007
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 24, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1668

Lower Tribunal No. 18-17443 CC

________________

Claudia E. Lewis, etc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Great Northern Insurance Company, etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Myriam 

Lehr, Judge.

The Burton Firm, P.A., and Marc A. Burton and Richard J. Burton, for 

appellant.

Kennedys Law and Kristen D. Perkins and Jordan H. Lewis, for 

appellee.

Before LINDSEY, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### §3202. Standards of conduct

#### (a) Provision and enforcement

The Secretary shall provide, and directors of Job Corps centers shall stringently enforce, standards of conduct within the centers. Such standards of conduct shall include provisions forbidding the actions described in subsection (b)(2)(A).

#### (b) Disciplinary measures

#### (1) In general

To promote the proper behavioral standards in the Job Corps, the directors of Job Corps centers shall have the authority to take appropriate disciplinary measures against enrollees if such a director determines that an enrollee has committed a violation of the standards of conduct. The director shall dismiss the enrollee from the Job Corps if the director determines that the retention of the enrollee in the Job Corps will jeopardize the enforcement of such standards, threaten the safety of staff, students, or the local community, or diminish the opportunities of other enrollees.

#### (2) Zero tolerance policy and drug testing

#### (A) Guidelines

The Secretary shall adopt guidelines establishing a zero tolerance policy for an act of violence, for use, sale, or possession of a controlled substance, for abuse of alcohol, or for other illegal or disruptive activity.

#### (B) Drug testing

The Secretary shall require drug testing of all enrollees for controlled substances in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Secretary under section 3195(a) of this title.

#### (C) Definitions

In this paragraph:

#### (i) Controlled substance

The term "controlled substance" has the meaning given the term in section 802 of title 21.

#### (ii) Zero tolerance policy

The term "zero tolerance policy" means a policy under which an enrollee shall be automatically dismissed from the Job Corps after a determination by the director that the enrollee has carried out an action described in subparagraph (A).

#### (c) Appeal

A disciplinary measure taken by a director under this section shall be subject to expeditious appeal in accordance with procedures established by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 113–128, title I, §152, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1549.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark L. Lemond, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company. |

| Date:  December 7, 2006 | By:    | /s/ Mark L. Lemond                    |
|-----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                              |   |                                       |
|                              |   | Mark L. Lemond                        |
|                              |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
#### § 73.1 Purpose of part.

This part implements section 1316 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6266

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHN HENRY CONNER, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 21-6267

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHN HENRY CONNER, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Senior District Judge. (7:10-cr-00040-GEC-1; 7:20-cv-81458-

GEC-PMS; 7:11-cr-00036-GEC-1; 7:20-cv-81459-GEC-PMS)

Submitted: August 24, 2021 Decided: August 27, 2021
2

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Henry Conner, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kari Kristina Munro, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, John Henry Conner, Jr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Whiteside v. United 

States, 775 F.3d 180, 182-83 (4th Cir. 2014) (en banc) (explaining that § 2255 motions are 

subject to one-year statute of limitations, running from latest of four commencement dates 

enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Conner has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
§ 12.13 Unclaimed shipments. ( a ) If plants or plant products enterable into the United States under the rules and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Agriculture are unclaimed, they may be sold subject to the provisions of subparts C and D of part 127 of this chapter to any person to whom a permit has been issued who can comply with the requirements of the regulations governing the material involved.
( b ) Unclaimed plants and plant products not complying with the requirements mentioned in this section shall be destroyed, by burning or otherwise, under Customs supervision.
[28 FR 14710, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 74-114, 39 FR 12091, Apr. 3, 1974]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-150 FOR IMMDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, August 21, 1998)

NRC TO HOLD WORKSHOP ON IMPROVING ASSESSMENT

OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PERFORMANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a four-day

workshop Sept.28-Oct. 1 in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan

area to discuss ways for improving the agency’s process for

assessing the performance of licensed nuclear power plants.

Sessions will be held at the Bethesda Marriott Hotel, 5151

Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 20814. They will begin at 8 a.m.

daily, ending at 5 p.m. the first three days, and at 2 p.m. on

the final day.

The workshop, which will be open to the public, is

structured so that high level policy issues will be covered

during the first two days, with more detailed process development

discussions scheduled on the last two. The agenda is so designed

to encourage participation during the first two days by senior

executives who might be unable to attend the entire program.

NRC has scheduled this workshop as part of a larger effort

to develop more efficient ways for assessing the performance of

nuclear power plant licensees. The agency recently asked for

public comments on areas for improving the assessment process.

These topics were grouped into four major issues involved in the

program-ˇregulatory oversight approach, the attributes of an

integrated assessment process, the use of risk-informed

assessment guidance, and the use of performance indicators.

NRC staff will use information gathered from the forthcoming

workshop and from the public comment process to develop a final

proposal to be presented to the Commission by early January.

Those interested in attending the workshop are asked to preregister at least three weeks in advance. In addition to their

names, addresses and affiliation, those pre-registering are asked

to specify breakout sessions of interest.
-2-

Participants who wish to pre-register by electronic mail may

do so by contacting Timothy Frye at TJF@NRC.GOV, or David

Gamberoni at DLG2@NRC.GOV. Pre-registration information also may

be sent by fax to 301/415-3707, or by regular mail to U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Timothy J. Frye, Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Mail Stop O-5H4, Washington, DC

20555-0001.

A block of rooms will be available at the Bethesda Marriott

until Sept. 9. They should be reserved by contacting the hotel

at 301/897-9400. The block room rate is $126 per night,

including tax. Reservations will be accepted on a spaceavailable basis after Sept. 9.

The tentative workshop agenda is posted on the NRC Internet

web page at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/changes.htm.

###
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-201 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 2
		

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-201 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of 2
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-179 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Friday, December 6,

1996)

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION CERTIFIES TWO

STANDARDIZED REACTOR DESIGNS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved rules that

will certify two evolutionary reactor designs, the ASEA Brown

Boveri-Combustion Engineering System 80+ and General Electric

Nuclear Energy's Advanced Boiling Water Reactor.

In an affirmation vote today, the Commission appproved with

some changes proposed regulations submitted by the staff earlier

this year. The NRC staff will now prepare rules which are

expected to be published in the Federal Register early next year.

In the past, reactor designs were generally approved by the

NRC's Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation as part of the

licensing process for a specific plant rather than by rulemaking.

The new process gives industry an option to seek approval by

rulemaking for a generic reactor design.

Use of a standardized reactor design would permit a utility

to apply for a combined license in place of the historical twostep process involving separate proceedings at both the

construction permit and operating license stages.

The Advanced Boiling Reactor and the System 80+ designs are

for nuclear power facilities which would be capable of producing

about 1300 megawatts of electricity, slightly more power than the

largest reactors in use by industry today.

Designs for the two plants were received by the NRC in 1987

and NRC staff completed its technical review in 1994, issuing

Final Design Approvals. On April 7, 1995, NRC published two

proposed rules for certification of the U.S. Advanced Boiling

Water Reactor and the System 80+ designs, and the environmental

assessments for each design. NRC invited public comment on the

proposed rules and environmental assessments, and provided an

opportunity to request an informal hearing before an Atomic

Safety & Licensing Board.
In addition, NRC conducted a series of public meetings for

the purpose of clarifying the provisions of the rules and

affording the public opportunity for comments. The official

comment period ended August 7, 1995 and NRC did not receive any

requests for an informal hearing or comments on the environmental

assessments.
### [§962. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 663]

Section, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 927, related to traveling expenses and subsistence for officers and employees of the courts of the United States and of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-048 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Monday, March 24,

1997)

NRC RELEASES MASSACHUSETTS SITE FOR UNRESTRICTED USE

FOLLOWING CLEANUP OF RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is releasing a Texas

Instruments, Inc. facility in Attleboro, Massachusetts, for

unrestricted use following cleanup of radioactive contamination

to levels that meet NRC release criteria.

The facility still conducts metallurgical production

activities, but no longer uses radioactive material in its

operations.

Metals and Controls, Inc., began operations using

radioactive materials at the site in 1952. In 1959, the company

merged with Texas Instruments. From 1952 through 1965 it

fabricated uranium fuel elements for the U.S. Naval Reactors

Program, the U.S. Air Force, U.S. government-funded research, and

a few commercial customers. Later, from 1965 through 1981, it

made fuel for the high flux isotope reactor at Oak Ridge National

Laboratory and other government-owned research reactors. It also

used depleted uranium and processed natural uranium at the

facility for research and development. Some materials

contaminated with low levels of radioactivity had been disposed

of in an on-site burial.

The company began cleaning up uranium contamination in 1981,

after operational activities ceased. NRC conducted periodic

inspections of the remediation activities. Based on radiological

surveys conducted by the licensee, NRC review of those surveys

and a confirmatory survey conducted in February 1997 by NRC staff

(accompanied and assisted by a representative from the

Commonwealth of Massachusetts), NRC concluded that

decommissioning has now been satisfactorily completed at the

Attleboro site.

The NRC is terminating Texas Instruments' license and is

removing the site from its Site Decommissioning Management Plan,

which identifies about 50 sites throughout the United States that

are contaminated with radioactive materials and warrant special

attention.
#
#### § 128.407 May SBA appeal a contracting officer's decision not to make a procurement available for award as a SDVOSB contract?

The SBA Administrator may appeal a contracting officer's decision not to make a particular requirement available for award as an SDVOSB sole source or a SDVOSB set-aside contract at or above the simplified acquisition threshold.
§ 63.6 Reimbursable relocation costs. In addition to the coverage described in § 63.5 of this part, relocation costs for which benefits are payable under section 1306(c) of the Act include the costs of: ( a ) Removing the structure from the site,
( b ) Site cleanup,
( c ) Debris removal,
( d ) Moving the structure to a new site, and
( e ) At the new site, a new foundation and related grading, including elevating the structure as required by local flood plain management ordinances, and sewer, septic, electric, gas, telephone, and water connections at the building.
§ 114.3 Carnets. ( a ) *Use.* A carnet issued in conformity with the provisions of a Convention or Agreement identified in § 114.2 and with the regulations in this part shall serve as an entry document within the scope contemplated by the applicable Convention or Agreement and as a bond for the performance of acts in compliance with the provisions of such Convention or Agreement and the Customs statutes and regulations which are involved. Such carnet shall: ( 1 ) Show the period for which it is valid,
( 2 ) Be fully completed in accordance with the provisions of the Convention or Agreement which provides for its issuance, and
( 3 ) Include an English translation whenever the goods covered by a carnet are described in another language.
( b ) *Area of validity.* Carnets are valid in the customs territory of the United States which includes only the States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
[T.D. 71-70, 36 FR 4490, Mar. 6, 1971, as amended by T.D. 98-10, 63 FR 4168, Jan. 28, 1998]
§ 63.16 Review of State application by the Federal Insurance Administrator. ( a ) The Federal Insurance Administrator may return the application for eligibility upon finding it incomplete or upon finding that additional information is required in order to make a determination as to the adequacy of the coastal zone management program and erosion rate data base.
( b ) Upon determining that the State's program and/or data base does not meet the criteria set forth in § 63.14, the Federal Insurance Administrator shall in writing reject the application for eligibility and indicate in what respects the State program and/or data base fails to comply with the criteria.
( c ) Upon determining that the State program and data base meets the criteria set forth in § 63.14, the Federal Insurance Administrator shall approve the State as eligible to certify structures subject to imminent collapse. Such approval, however, is in all cases provisional. The Federal Insurance Administrator shall review the State program and data base for continued compliance with the criteria set forth in this part and may request updated documentation for the purpose of such review. If the program and/or data base is found to be inadequate and is not corrected within ninety days from the date that such inadequacies were identified, the Federal Insurance Administrator may revoke his approval.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

97-144 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(October 1,

1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A meeting of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory

Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) subcommittee scheduled for

October 9 in Rockville, Maryland, has been postponed due to the

unavailability of documents.

The meeting of the Subcommittee on Reactor Fuels, Onsite

Fuel Storage, and Decommissioning will be rescheduled at a date

to be announced in a future Federal Register notice.

#
### §389. Officer and witness fees

(a) Each judge, clerk of court, or other officer who issues any subpena or takes a deposition and each person who serves any subpena or other paper herein authorized shall be entitled to receive from the party at whose instance the service shall have been performed such fees as are allowed for similar services in the district courts of the United States.

(b) Witnesses whose depositions are taken shall be entitled to receive from the party at whose instance the witness appeared the same fees and travel allowance paid to witnesses subpenaed to appear before the House of Representatives or its committees.

(Pub. L. 91–138, §10, Dec. 5, 1969, 83 Stat. 288.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to any general or special election for Representative in, or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress of the United States occurring after Dec. 5, 1969, see section 19 of Pub. L. 91–138, set out as a note under section 381 of this title.