alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-71 June 17, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC PROPOSES $55,000 FINE AGAINST GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION

FOR VIOLATIONS INVOLVING EMERGENCY SYSTEM AT OYSTER CREEK PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a

$55,000 civil penalty against the operator of the Oyster Creek

nuclear power plant for two violations of agency requirements

relating to an emergency safety system. GPU Nuclear

Corporation owns and operates the boiling-water reactor in

Lacey Township, N.J.

At issue is the operability of the facility’s

automatic depressurization system (ADS), which would be needed

to reduce pressure in the reactor under certain accident

conditions so that emergency coolant could be injected. (Both

temperature and pressure inside reactors and their associated

systems are at elevated levels when the units are operating.)

The violations were found during an NRC engineering

team inspection conducted at the plant between Feb. 23 and

April 2. A predecisional enforcement conference regarding the

infractions was held on May 29 at the NRC Region I office in

King of Prussia, Pa.

Specifically, the NRC determined that GPU Nuclear

failed to ensure -- through design control measures -- that

there was adequate voltage for the depressurization system’s

electromatic relief valves to function during a postulated

small-break, loss-of-coolant accident, concurrent with a loss

of offsite power and the failure of an emergency diesel

generator. As a result, only two of the five valves would have

been operational and capable of depressurizing the reactor

under that accident scenario, reducing the plant’s safety

margins.

In addition, the NRC found that the voltage

requirement in the equipment qualification documentation for

the five valves’ solenoids, or actuators, was not

representative of the actual application as installed. No

analysis was performed to validate the established

qualification voltage.
2

NRC Region I Administrator Hubert J. Miller, in a

letter to GPU Nuclear informing it of the enforcement action,

said the violations represent a “significant NRC concern

because three of the five (electromatic relief valves) are

required to be operable for ADS to accomplish its design basis

function of depressurizing the reactor during a small-break

loss-of-coolant accident to allow for the low-pressure safety

emergency core cooling systems to inject water into the reactor

vessel.”

The utility has 30 days to pay the fine or request in

writing that all or part it be withdrawn.

#
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.1017 Accumulation. ( a ) Originating goods or materials from the territory of one Party, incorporated into a good in the territory of the other Party will be considered to originate in the territory of that other Party.
( b ) A good that is produced in the territory of one or both of the Parties by one or more producers is an originating good if the good satisfies the requirements of § 10.1014 of this subpart and all other applicable requirements of General Note 33, HTSUS.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II

101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900

Atlanta, GA 30323

No. II-96-79 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark (404) 331-5503 (Monday, September

16,1996)

NRC OFFICIAL TO HOLD NEWS CONFERENCE IN RALEIGH ON SEPTEMBER 20

The top Nuclear Regulatory Commission official in the

southeast will hold a special news conference in Raleigh on Friday,

September 20, to discuss the agency's regulatory responsibilities

at commercial nuclear facilities in North Carolina and the United

States.

Stewart D. Ebneter, Administrator of the NRC's Region II

office in Atlanta, will brief reporters at 11:00 a.m. (EDT) in

Governor's Room One at the Radisson Hotel, 421 S. Salisbury Street,

on current regulatory issues at the Harris nuclear power plant near

Raleigh, the Brunswick plant near Southport and the McGuire plant

near Charlotte. He will also address Hurricane Fran effects and

responses at both the Brunswick and Harris plants, as well as

overall NRC preparations for emergency response in the event of

hurricanes, accidents or other events.

Ebneter will discuss the status of the North Carolina State

University research reactor in Raleigh, transportation and storage

of spent fuel, NRC's regulatory agreement with the State of North

Carolina and the status of and NRC responsibilities relating to

low-level radioactive waste in North Carolina and the southeast.

NRC regional officials hold these news conferences on a

quarterly basis to discuss events at regulated facilities and

answer reporters' questions on these subjects.

####
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:20-cv-22468-KMW

DOUG LONGHINI, 

Plaintiff,

v.

BISCAYNER SOUTH, LLC and 

YNTO FOOD CORP.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff, DOUG LONGHINI, and Defendants, BISCAYNER SOUTH, LLC and YNTO 

FOOD CORP., hereby advise the Court that the parties have reached an agreement in principle to 

settle the instant case pending execution of a Settlement Agreement. The parties will file a 

Stipulation dismissing this Action with prejudice once the settlement agreement is executed, which 

they reasonably expect to do no later than 45 days from the date of this Notice. Accordingly, the 

Parties, respectfully request that the Court vacate all currently set dates and deadlines.

Respectfully submitted this 27th, day of August, 2020.

/s/ Anthony J. Perez

ANTHONY J. PEREZ

Florida Bar No.: 535451

GARCIA-MENOCAL & PEREZ, P.L.

4937 S.W. 74th Court, Unit #3

Miami, FL 33155

Telephone: (305) 553- 3464

Facsímile: (305) 553-3031

Primary Email: ajperezlaw@gmail.com;

aquezada@lawgmp.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Robert T. Slatoff

ROBERT T. SLATOFF

Florida Bar No.: 816116

FRANK WEINBERG & BLACK, P.L.

1875 N.W. Corporate Boulevard, Ste 100

Boca Raton, FL 33431

Telephone: (561) 989-0700

Primary Email: rslatoff@fwblaw.net

Counsel for Defendant, YNTO Food Corp.

/s/ Jorge L. Fors

JORGE L. FORS

Case 1:20-cv-22468-KMW Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Florida Bar No.: 347647

FORS | ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1108 Ponce de Leon Blvd.

Coral Gables, FL 33134

Telephone: (305) 448-5977

Primary Email: jfors@forslegal.com

Counsel for Defendant, Biscayner South

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court 

by using the CM/ECF system. I further certify a copy of the foregoing was sent by CM/ECF to 

all counsel of record on this 27th, day of August, 2020.

Respectfully submitted,

 GARCIA-MENOCAL & PEREZ, P.L.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

4937 S.W. 74th Court, No. 3

Miami, FL 33155

Telephone: (305) 553-3464

Facsimile: (305) 553-3031

Primary E-Mail: ajperez@lawgmp.com

 Secondary E-Mail: aquezada@lawgmp.com;

bvirues@lawgmp.com

crodriguez@lawgmp.com.

By: /s/ Anthony J. Perez____ 

 ANTHONY J. PEREZ

 Florida Bar No.: 535451

 

Case 1:20-cv-22468-KMW Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### § 295.14 Assignments.

Assignment of claims and the right to receive compensation for claims under the CGFAA is prohibited and will not be recognized by FEMA.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.12 Definitions. As used in §§ 10.11 through 10.24, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: ( a ) *American-made.* The term “American-made” is used to refer to a product of the United States as defined in paragraph (e) of this section.
( b ) *Assembly.* “Assembly” means the fitting or joining together of fabricated components.
( c ) *Exemption.* “Exemption” means the deduction of the cost or value of products of the United States which were assembled abroad in accordance with the requirements of subheading 9802.00.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202), from the full value of the assembled article.
( d ) *Fabricated component.* “Fabricated component” means a manufactured article ready for assembly in the condition as exported except for operations incidental to the assembly.
( e ) *Product of the United States.* A “product of the United States” is an article manufactured within the Customs territory of the United States and may consist wholly of United States components or materials, of United States and foreign components or materials, or wholly of foreign components or materials. If the article consists wholly or partially of foreign components or materials, the manufacturing process must be such that the foreign components or materials have been substantially transformed into a new and different article, or have been merged into a new and different article.
[T.D. 75-230, 40 FR 43021, Sept. 18, 1975, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51247, Dec. 21, 1988]
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-96-39 July 10, 1996

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 708/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 708/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC AUGMENTED INSPECTION TEAM TO PRESENT FINDINGS

AT LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Augmented Inspection Team

will meet Wednesday (July 17) with Commonwealth Edison Company

officials to discuss findings of its recent inspection at the

LaSalle nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be at 1 p.m. in the Brookfield Township

Hall on Grand Ridge Road west of Highway 170 and one mile east of

the LaSalle plant, and will be open for public observation.

After the meeting there will be an opportunity for questions from

reporters and for comments and questions from members of the

public.

NRC dispatched the special team to the plant on July 1 to

review the circumstances of a polymer foam material getting into

the intake tunnel which supplies cooling water for both safety

and non-safety related equipment cooling systems.

The six-person inspection team is headed by Roger Lanksbury,

a Branch Chief from the NRC's Region III Office.

When Commonwealth Edison notified NRC of the incident, it

had learned that foreign material in this cooling water system

resulted from repair of cracks in the concrete of the service

water intake building.

The utility shut down both LaSalle units on June 28 because

of the potential that the material could restrict water flow to

safety system equipment.

Commonwealth Edison has since cleaned the tunnel and tested

the affected cooling water systems, and now considers the systems

to be operable.

The team will issue a written report in several weeks.

####
PUBLIC LAW 110–212—MAY 7, 2008 122 STAT. 725 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3532: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Feb. 12, considered and passed House. 

Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–212 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5815 McLeod 

Street in Lula, Georgia, as the ‘‘Private Johnathon Millican Lula Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. PRIVATE JOHNATHON MILLICAN LULA POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 5815 McLeod Street in Lula, Georgia, shall be 

known and designated as the ‘‘Private Johnathon Millican Lula 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Private Johnathon Millican Lula Post Office’’. 

Approved May 7, 2008. 

May 7, 2008 

[H.R. 3532] 


jbridges on POFP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2227

PAUL A. MITCHELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY; WAYNE 

COMMUNITY COLLEGE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,

Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00584-D)

Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul A. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Johnston, EMPLOYMENT 

SECURITY COMMISSION OF NORTH CAROLINA; Joshua Mark Krasner, 

JACKSON LEWIS PC, Cary, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Paul A. Mitchell appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Title VI and Title 

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and denying his request for

a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court.*

 Mitchell v. N.C. Div. of Emp’t Sec., No. 5:14-cv-00584-D 

(E.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 2014). We deny as moot Mitchell’s motion to 

expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

 * To the extent that Mitchell appeals the denial of his 

request for a temporary restraining order, such denials are 

generally not appealable. See Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc., 538 

F.2d 1026, 1029–30 (4th Cir. 1976). We therefore dismiss the 

appeal insofar as he is appealing the denial of a temporary 

restraining order.
No: IV-23-012 December 14, 2023 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128 

NRC to Hold Virtual Meeting Dec. 21 to Seek Public Comments 

on Draft Environmental Report for Comanche Peak License Renewal

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a virtual meeting from 2-4 p.m. Central time 

on Dec. 21 to gather comments on the draft supplemental environmental impact statement for 

renewing the operating licenses of the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant for an additional 20 

years. Comanche Peak Unit 1’s operating license expires Feb. 8, 2030, and Unit 2’s on Feb. 2, 

2033. 

Participants can join by Microsoft Teams or by teleconference at 301-576-2978, passcode 

588791843#. The agency is scheduling this additional meeting due to technical difficulties during a 

Dec. 7 virtual meeting. 

The NRC’s review of the license renewal application consists of a safety review and an 

environmental review. The draft report is part of the NRC’s environmental review and is available 

on the NRC’s website. The final environmental report is anticipated to be issued in spring 2024. 

In addition to providing oral comments at the meeting, members of the public also can 

submit comments three other ways: Online at regulations.gov, under Docket ID NRC-2022-0183; 

email to Tam.Tran@nrc.gov; or by U.S. Mail to Office of Administration, Mail Stop TWFN-7-

A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. 

The deadline for submitting comments is Dec. 26.
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 17-1319V 

 Filed: June 15, 2018 

UNPUBLISHED 

RICHARD BRANDELL, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES, 

 Respondent. 

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; 

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) 

   

Jenifer Marie Placzek, Placzek Winget & Placzek, Springfield, MO, for petitioner. 

Kathryn Ann Robinette, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On September 25, 2017, Richard Brandell (“petitioner”) filed a petition for 

compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 

§300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered GuillainBarre syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on 

October 27, 2014. Petition at 1, 4. The case was assigned to the Special Processing 

Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 

On June 15, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes 

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report 

at 1. Specifically, respondent concludes “that petitioner’s alleged injury meets the 

requirement of the Vaccine Injury table for GBS following the seasonal influenza 

                                                            

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
2

vaccination... Petitioner had the onset of GBS within three to forty-two days of receiving 

the flu vaccine, the diagnosis is not in dispute, and no other cause for his GBS have 

been identified.” Id. at 6. Respondent further agrees that “petitioner’s records show 

that he suffered sequela of his injury for more than six months after vaccination.” Id.

 In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
§ 61.7 Risk premium rate determinations. ( a ) Pursuant to section 1307 of the Act, the Federal Insurance Administrator is authorized to undertake studies and investigations to enable him/her to estimate the risk premium rates necessary to provide flood insurance in accordance with accepted actuarial principles, including applicable operating costs and allowances. Such rates are also referred to in this subchapter as “actuarial rates.”
( b ) The Federal Insurance Administrator is also authorized to prescribe by regulation the rates which can reasonably be charged to insureds in order to encourage them to purchase the flood insurance made available under the Program. Such rates are referred to in this subchapter as “chargeable rates.” For areas having special flood, mudslide (i.e., mudflow), and flood-related erosion hazards, chargeable rates are usually lower than actuarial rates.
From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov> 

Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2015 6:23 PM 

To: Vasu, Amy 

Cc: Szabo, Aaron; Culligan, Kevin; Harvey, Reid; Tsirigotis, Peter 

Subject: RE: Revised CPP final rule package and RIA 

Thanks all, 

Please have the final CLEAN versions of the rule document and RIA uploaded to ROCIS in the 

appropriate places. 

 

Please upload the rule under “primary documents” and RIA under “supplementary documents.” 

 

Thanks very much. 

Nathan 

 

From: Vasu, Amy 

Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2015 5:58 PM 

To: Frey, Nathan J. 

Cc: Szabo, Aaron; Culligan, Kevin; Harvey, Reid; Tsirigotis, Peter 

Subject: Revised CPP final rule package and RIA 

Nathan, 

Attached are the revised Clean Power Plan final rule package and the RIA and spreadsheets for 

the CPP final rule. Clean and RLSO versions of the final rule and RIA are attached. 

Thank you. 

Amy 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

Amy B. Vasu 

U.S. EPA / OAQPS 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

email: vasu.amy@epa.gov 

phone: 919.541.0107
#### Ernest Reich, Respondent, v. Griswold Manufacturing Company, Appellant.

Ho opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03672

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 03672\03672_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03672\03672_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 03672\03672_Follow-Up Questions_01.21.2011.xlsx Draft Questions for Follow Up

03672\03672_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03672\03672_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03672\03672_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03672\03672_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03672\03672_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03672\03672_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03672\Certification Statement Plant ID 03672.pdf Plant certification statement

x 03672\Supplemental Documents\03672_KU-BR - WB-1 Water Balance Block Diagram - 1011r7.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03672\Supplemental Documents\03672_KU-EWBrown A5-2 - Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03672\Supplemental Documents\KU-BR - D-1 Wastewater Treatment Block Diagram - 1011r7.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03672\Supplemental Documents\KU-BR - Unit 1-2 Bottom Ash System - 1011.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03672\Supplemental Documents\KU-BR - Unit 1-2 Fly Ash System - 1011.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03672\Supplemental Documents\KU-BR - Unit 3 Bottom Ash System - 1011.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03672\Supplemental Documents\KU-BR - Unit 3 Fly Ash System - 1011.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03672\Supplemental Documents\KU-EWBrown - Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### § 106.403 Who has authority to approve and sign a Non-Fee Based Record?

The appropriate Responsible Program Official, after consultation with the designated legal counsel, has authority to approve and sign each Non-Fee Based Record.