alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 6103.1.1 Management for Land Health. ( a ) To facilitate ecosystem resilience, authorized officers should use watershed condition assessments (*see* § 6103.2), and land health evaluations and causal factor determinations to support decision-making. Such action promotes efficiency, supports environmental analysis, and streamlines decision-making.
( b ) To facilitate ecosystem resilience, authorized officers must manage all program areas to progress toward achieving land health standards. ( 1 ) Authorized officers must apply approved land health standards, as revised from rangeland health standards previously established under subpart 4180 of this chapter (fundamentals of rangeland health), across all ecosystems managed by the BLM.
( 2 ) Programs that authorize and manage uses or implement management actions on public land will develop management guidelines, which are best management practices designed to facilitate progress toward achievement and maintenance of land health standards. ( i ) Authorized officers may develop or adopt additional management guidelines to address local ecosystems and management practices.
( ii ) Programs and authorized officers will review management guidelines for sufficiency and make necessary revisions at least every 10 years in conjunction with the review of land health standards described in this subpart.
( c ) Land use plans must identify the allocations and actions anticipated to achieve desired land health outcomes, including actions to maintain or restore land health in accordance with the land health standards. These actions include, but are not limited to, prioritizing development in degraded areas as well as prioritizing and implementing restoration actions (*see* § 6102.3).
( d ) Land use plans shall identify statutory, regulatory, and other requirements that may prevent achievement of land health standards. ( 1 ) Best management practices and mitigation measures to minimize effects to land health resulting from these requirements should be identified and required where practicable.
( 2 ) Environmental effects analysis, consistent with NEPA requirements, for proposed management actions must consider effects to relevant land health standards.
**EXHIBIT32.0**

 

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eastern American Natural GasTrust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee ofthe Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Trust at the dates and for the period presented.

 

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as partof the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

 

 
|   | The Bank of New York,                          |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|   | Trustee for Eastern American Natural Gas Trust |
|   |                                           |
|   |                                           |
|   | By:                                            | /s/ Patrick Tadie |   |
|   |                                           | Vice President |
|   |                                           | The Bank of New York |
|        |                                                |  |  |  |

 

----
### **CHAPTER 8—FEDERAL CORRUPT PRACTICES**
###### Editorial Note on Part 121

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 121 appear at 72 FR 50039 and 50040, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 121.412 What are the size procedures for partial small business set-asides?

A firm is required to meet size standard requirements only for the small business set-aside portion of a procurement, and is not required to qualify as a small business for the unrestricted portion.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 3,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Mark L. Lemond, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
  Company.

|Date: | June 11,
      2008 | By:/s/ Mark L. Lemond         | 
|----- | ------------------- | ----------------------------- | 
|      |                     | Mark L.
      Lemond          | 
|      |                     | President
      and           | 
|      |                     | Chief Executive
      Officer | 

---
Exhibit 4.418

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182090 dated June 30, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Data transmission services, except for data transmission services for the purpose of voice transmission

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until June 30, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 06, 2020 No. 145-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ A.A.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here
    	
 
    
	
Official seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS
    	
 
    
	
COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
    	
 
    
	
IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF COMMUNICATIONS,
    	
 
    
	
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119148
### §2251. Stay of State court proceedings

(a) In General.—

(1) Pending matters.—A justice or judge of the United States before whom a habeas corpus proceeding is pending, may, before final judgment or after final judgment of discharge, or pending appeal, stay any proceeding against the person detained in any State court or by or under the authority of any State for any matter involved in the habeas corpus proceeding.

(2) Matter not pending.—For purposes of this section, a habeas corpus proceeding is not pending until the application is filed.

(3) Application for appointment of counsel.—If a State prisoner sentenced to death applies for appointment of counsel pursuant to section 3599(a)(2) of title 18 in a court that would have jurisdiction to entertain a habeas corpus application regarding that sentence, that court may stay execution of the sentence of death, but such stay shall terminate not later than 90 days after counsel is appointed or the application for appointment of counsel is withdrawn or denied.

(b) No Further Proceedings.—After the granting of such a stay, any such proceeding in any State court or by or under the authority of any State shall be void. If no stay is granted, any such proceeding shall be as valid as if no habeas corpus proceedings or appeal were pending.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 966; Pub. L. 109–177, title V, §507(f), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 251.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §465 (R.S. §766; Mar. 3, 1893, ch. 226, 27 Stat. 751; Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, §8(c), 43 Stat. 940; June 19, 1934, ch. 673, 48 Stat. 1177).

Provisions relating to proceedings pending in 1934 were deleted as obsolete.

A provision requiring an appeal to be taken within 3 months was omitted as covered by sections 2101 and 2107 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–177 designated first par. of existing provisions as subsec. (a)(1) and inserted headings, added pars. (2) and (3), and designated second par. of existing provisions as subsec. (b) and inserted heading.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2006 Amendment

Pub. L. 109–177, title V, §507(d), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 251, provided that:

"(1) In general.—This section [enacting section 2265 of this title, amending this section and sections 2261 and 2266 of this title, and repealing former section 2265 of this title] and the amendments made by this section shall apply to cases pending on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Mar. 9, 2006].

"(2) Time limits.—In a case pending on the date of enactment of this Act, if the amendments made by this section establish a time limit for taking certain action, the period of which began on the date of an event that occurred prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the period of such time limit shall instead begin on the date of enactment of this Act."
### **CHAPTER 17A—CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET AND FISCAL OPERATIONS**

Sec.
621.
Congressional declaration of purpose.
622.
Definitions.
623.
Continuing study of additional budget reform proposals.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET PROCESS

631.
Timetable.
632.
Annual adoption of concurrent resolution on the budget.
633.
Committee allocations.
634.
Concurrent resolution on the budget must be adopted before budget-related legislation is considered.
635.
Permissible revisions of concurrent resolutions on the budget.
636.
Provisions relating to consideration of concurrent resolutions on the budget.
637.
Legislation dealing with Congressional budget must be handled by Budget Committees.
638.
House Committee action on all appropriation bills to be completed by June 10.
639.
Reports, summaries, and projections of Congressional budget actions.
640.
House approval of regular appropriation bills.
641.
Reconciliation.
642.
Budget-related legislation must be within appropriate levels.
643.
Determinations and points of order.
644.
Extraneous matter in reconciliation legislation.
645.
Adjustments.
645a.
Effect of adoption of special order of business in House of Representatives.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—FISCAL PROCEDURES

#### Part A—General Provisions

651.
Budget-related legislation not subject to appropriations.
652.
Repealed.
653.
Analysis by Congressional Budget Office.
654.
Study by Government Accountability Office of forms of Federal financial commitment not reviewed annually by Congress.
655.
Off-budget agencies, programs, and activities.
656.
Member User Group.

#### Part B—Federal Mandates

658.
Definitions.
658a.
Exclusions.
658b.
Duties of Congressional committees.
658c.
Duties of Director; statements on bills and joint resolutions other than appropriations bills and joint resolutions.
658d.
Legislation subject to point of order.
658e.
Provisions relating to House of Representatives.
658f.
Requests to Congressional Budget Office from Senators.
658g.
Clarification of application.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—CREDIT REFORM

661.
Purposes.
661a.
Definitions.
661b.
OMB and CBO analysis, coordination, and review.
661c.
Budgetary treatment.
661d.
Authorizations.
661e.
Treatment of deposit insurance and agencies and other insurance programs.
661f.
Effect on other laws.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—BUDGET AGREEMENT ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS

665 to 665e. Repealed.
Rules in.txt

Subject: GBUAPCD Rules 216,405, 307,502

Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:01:18 -0700

From: Shirley Ono <sanono89@yahoo.com>

To: "Dave Brown, ARB" <dabrown@arb.ca.gov>

CC: Duane Ono <duaneono@yahoo.com>

Dave,

Attached is the District's rule revision package for Rules 216, 405, 307 &

502 as it relates to SB700. Please note that the District has two (2) rules

numbered 216 and that the July 7, 2005, revision was made on the one that

was adopted on 10/15/79. Please let me know if you need anything else.

Shirley Ono

Great Basin Unified APCD

157 Short Street

Bishop, CA 93514

(760) 872-8211

(760) 872-6109 Fax

 Name: Rules

 

216.405.307.502.Board

Rpt.Final.070705.pdf

 Type: Portable 

Document

 Rules 216.405.307.502.Board Rpt.Final.070705.pdf Format

(application/pdf)

 Encoding: base64

 Download Status: Not downloaded 

with

 message

 Name: ARB.evalform (Rule

 216,405,307,502).pdf

 Type: Portable Document

 ARB.evalform (Rule 216,405,307,502).pdf Format

 (application/pdf)

 Encoding: base64

 Download Status: Not downloaded with

 message

 Name: Public

 Comment.Minutes.Item

 10.pdf

 Type: Portable Document

 Public Comment.Minutes.Item 10.pdf Format

 (application/pdf)

 Encoding: base64

 Download Status: Not downloaded with

 message

 Name: Board Order &

 Resolution.pdf

 Board Order & Resolution.pdf Type: Portable Document Format

 (application/pdf)

 Encoding: base64

 Download Status: Not downloaded with message

 Name: Proof of Publication.pdf

Page 1
Rules in.txt

 Type: Portable Document Format

 Proof of Publication.pdf (application/pdf)

 Encoding: base64

 Download Status: Not downloaded with message

 Name: Rule 216 &

 405.Redlline.070705.doc

 Type: Microsoft Word Document

 Rule 216 & 405.Redlline.070705.doc (application/msword)

 Encoding: base64

 Download Status: Not downloaded with

 message

 Name: Rule 502.Adopted 070705.doc

 Type: Microsoft Word Document

 Rule 502.Adopted 070705.doc (application/msword)

 Encoding: base64

 Download Status: Not downloaded with message

 Name: Rule 405.Final.Revised

 070705.doc

 Type: Microsoft Word

 Rule 405.Final.Revised 070705.doc Document

 (application/msword)

 Encoding: base64

 Download Status: Not downloaded with

 message

 Name: Rule 307.Adopted 070705.doc

 Type: Microsoft Word Document

 Rule 307.Adopted 070705.doc (application/msword)

 Encoding: base64

 Download Status: Not downloaded with message

 Name: Rule 216.Final.Revised

 070705.doc

 Type: Microsoft Word

 Rule 216.Final.Revised 070705.doc Document

 (application/msword)

 Encoding: base64

 Download Status: Not downloaded with

 message

 Name: 

ARB.Rule.SIP

 

Completeness

Checklist (Rule

216,405,307,502).pdf

 ARB.Rule.SIP Completeness Checklist (Rule 216,405,307,502).pdf Type: 

Portable Document

Format

(application/pdf)

 Encoding: 

base64

 Download Status: 

Not downloaded with

 

message

Page 2
#### In the Matter of The Commissioner of Public Works (Bridge over the Harlem River).

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements, on authority of *Matter of Commissioner of Public Works*(135 App. Div. 561). Present — McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
ex_236740.htm


Exhibit 10.11


 


SUMMARY OF CONSULTING AGREEMENT


 


On Feb 15, 2021 (the “Effective Date”), BioCardia, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a consulting agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with Dr. Eric Duckers, former Chief Medical Officer of the Company. Dr. Duckers resigned as Chief Medical Officer of the Company, effective as of February 15th, 2021. 


 


Pursuant to the terms of the Consulting Agreement, Dr. Duckers will serve as an advisor to the executive steering committee of the CardiAMP Heart Failure clinical study on an as-needed and ongoing basis and will be paid $400 per hour.  


 


Either Dr. Duckers or the Company may terminate the Consulting Agreement at any time and for any reason upon thirty days advance written notice. Upon such termination, Dr. Duckers will be paid for services actually rendered and will not be entitled to any additional compensation.  


 


Dr. Ducker’s outstanding equity awards ceased vesting as of the Effective Date, and he will be able to exercise any outstanding equity awards for a period of ninety (90) days following the Effective Date.
### §1903. Audit; monitoring and evaluation

(a) The books and accounts of the Center shall be audited annually by an independent auditor in the manner prescribed by the Secretary and a report on each such audit shall be submitted by the auditor to the Secretary within 15 days following the completion of the audit and acceptance of the audit by the Center.

(b)(1) The Secretary shall establish procedures for monitoring, on a regular basis, the services performed and the training conducted by the Center.

(2) The Secretary shall, in addition to the regular monitoring required under paragraph (1), conduct an evaluation of the operation of the Center at the end of each fiscal year. A written report of such evaluation shall be submitted to the President, the Clerk of the House of Representatives, and the Secretary of the Senate within one hundred and eighty days after the end of the fiscal year for which such evaluation was conducted. The first such report shall be submitted for fiscal year 1983.

(Pub. L. 98–221, title II, §204, Feb. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 33; Pub. L. 102–569, title IX, §903, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4482.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–569 substituted "within 15 days following the completion of the audit and acceptance of the audit by the Center" for "at such time as the Secretary shall prescribe".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of provisions in subsec. (b)(2) of this section relating to submitting a written report to the Clerk of the House of Representatives and the Secretary of the Senate, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 81 of House Document No. 103–7.
### §1513. Impact on local governments

#### (a) Findings

The Senate finds that—

(1) the Congress should be concerned about shifting costs from Federal to State and local authorities and should be equally concerned about the growing tendency of States to shift costs to local governments;

(2) cost shifting from States to local governments has, in many instances, forced local governments to raise property taxes or curtail sometimes essential services; and

(3) increases in local property taxes and cuts in essential services threaten the ability of many citizens to attain and maintain the American dream of owning a home in a safe, secure community.

#### (b) Sense of Senate

It is the sense of the Senate that—

(1) the Federal Government should not shift certain costs to the State, and States should end the practice of shifting costs to local governments, which forces many local governments to increase property taxes;

(2) States should end the imposition, in the absence of full consideration by their legislatures, of State issued mandates on local governments without adequate State funding, in a manner that may displace other essential government priorities; and

(3) one primary objective of this chapter and other efforts to change the relationship among Federal, State, and local governments should be to reduce taxes and spending at all levels and to end the practice of shifting costs from one level of government to another with little or no benefit to taxpayers.

(Pub. L. 104–4, title I, §106, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 63.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b)(3), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–4, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 48, known as the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1501 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, or on the date 90 days after appropriations are made available as authorized under section 1516 of this title, whichever is earlier, and applicable to legislation considered on and after such date, see section 110 of Pub. L. 104–4, set out as a note under section 1511 of this title.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 00-006

January 5, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, JANUARY 13-14

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW)

will meet on January 13-14, in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss the proposed Yucca Mountain

high-level waste repository, among other things.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in Conference Room T-2B3 of the

agency’s Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike.

On Thursday, January 13, the meeting will start at 5 p.m. and include the preparation of

committee letters on the Department of Energy’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the

proposed repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada, the rubblization ( or demolition and burying

of foundation parts of former nuclear facilities) decommissioning option, and the NRC’s

proposed high-level waste regulation.

The following day’s agenda will begin at noon with continued letter writing and could

include ACNW planning and procedures.

Although ACNW meetings are open, they are not part of the agency’s normal hearing

process. The ACNW is an advisory group established by the NRC in 1988 to provide the agency

with independent technical review and advice on the disposal of nuclear waste.

While anyone may attend, the committee will consider only oral or written statements

arranged in advance and limited to specific matters described in a Notice of Meeting published in

an upcoming edition of the Federal Register. A detailed ACNW meeting agenda, transcripts and

letter reports are available on the internet, at http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW

Those seeking additional information on opportunities to present oral statements or on

final schedule changes, should contact Richard Major, at 301-415-7366.

###