alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.1540 Types of formal enforcement actions—Intermediaries participating in the Microloan Program. Upon a determination that any ground set out in § 120.1425 exists, the D/OCRM may undertake, in his/her discretion (and with the involvement of the LOC as appropriate and consistent with its assigned responsibilities), one or more of the following formal enforcement actions against an Intermediary, and is not restricted from delegating as appropriate: ( a ) S*uspension.* SBA may suspend an Intermediary's authority to participate in the Microloan Program, which may include, but is not limited to, the authority to make, service, liquidate, and/or litigate SBA microloans, and the imposition of a freeze on the Intermediary's MRF and LLRF accounts.
( b ) *Immediate suspension.* SBA may suspend, effective immediately, an Intermediary's authority to participate in the Microloan Program, which may include, but is not limited to, the authority to make, service, liquidate, and/or litigate SBA microloans, and the imposition of an immediate freeze on the Intermediary's MRF and LLRF accounts. Section 120.1425(c)(6) sets forth the grounds for SBA Microloan Program immediate suspension of an Intermediary.
( c ) *Revocation.* SBA may revoke an Intermediary's authority to participate in the Microloan Program which may include, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) Removal from the program;
( 2 ) Liquidation of the Intermediary's MRF and LLRF accounts by SBA, and application of the liquidated funds to any outstanding balance owed to SBA;
( 3 ) Payment of outstanding debt to SBA by the Intermediary;
( 4 ) Forfeiture or repayment of any unused grant funds by the Intermediary;
( 5 ) Debarment of the organization from receipt of Federal funds until loan and grant repayments are met; and
( 6 ) Surrender of possession of Intermediary's SBA microloan portfolio to SBA, with the microloan portfolio and all associated rights transferred on a permanent basis to SBA, in accordance with SBA's rights as a secured creditor.
( d ) *Other actions.* Such other actions available under law.
[85 FR 14783, Mar. 16, 2020]
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.1010 SBA access to SBA Lender and Intermediary files.

An SBA Lender and Intermediary must allow SBA's authorized representatives, including representatives authorized by the SBA Inspector General, during normal business hours, access to its files to review, inspect, and copy all records and documents, relating to SBA guaranteed loans or as requested for SBA oversight.

[73 FR 75519, Dec. 11, 2008, as amended at 85 FR 14781, Mar. 16, 2020]
§ 4.338 Submission by administrative law judge of proposed findings, conclusions and recommended decision. ( a ) When an evidentiary hearing pursuant to § 4.337(a) of this part is concluded, the administrative law judge shall recommend findings of fact and conclusions of law, stating the reasons for such recommendations. A copy of the recommended decision shall be sent to each party to the proceeding, the Bureau official involved, and the Board. Simultaneously, the entire record of the proceedings, including the transcript of the hearing before the administrative law judge, shall be forwarded to the Board.
( b ) The administrative law judge shall advise the parties at the conclusion of the recommended decision of their right to file exceptions or other comments regarding the recommended decision with the Board in accordance with § 4.339 of this part.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

I, Alan D. Feldman, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the quarter ended January 1, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Midas, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/  Alan D. Feldman                           
|Alan D. Feldman                                
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:    March 17, 2011                        

I, William M. Guzik, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the quarter ended January 1, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Midas, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/  William M. Guzik                                                                        
|William M. Guzik Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Date:    March 17, 2011
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-69 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, April 8, 1999)

NRC DELETES REPORTING REQUIREMENT

ON LOADING OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is amending its regulations to eliminate what has

been determined to be an unnecessary reporting requirement related to the loading of

commercial nuclear power plant spent fuel into independent storage installations.

The regulations previously required licensees to submit a report summarizing the

results of preoperational testing 30 days before loading. The purpose of this requirement was

to give the NRC sufficient time to inspect a licensee’s preparations for a new facility and, if

necessary, to require changes or other actions before the spent fuel loading took place. The

regulations did not require NRC approval of the 30-day report.

However, experience has shown that the NRC does not need such a report because

NRC staff representatives are on site during the preoperational testing and evaluate it as it

occurs. Agency inspectors review licensees’ normal, abnormal and emergency operating

procedures and observe their implementation during preoperational testing. The agency has

determined, therefore, that neither a preoperational test report nor a 30-day hold period is

required in order to complete its inspection activities.

###
### [§669. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–455, title VII, §701(d)(1), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1578]

Section, acts Oct. 16, 1962, Pub. L. 87–834, §7(e), 76 Stat. 986; Dec. 30, 1969, Pub. L. 91–172, title III, §331(a), 83 Stat. 596, related to the treatment of capital gain deemed distributed in preceding years.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to distributions made in taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1975, see section 701(h) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as an Effective Date of 1976 Amendment note under section 667 of this title.
S. 579 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty one 

An Act 

To make a technical correction to the ALS Disability Insurance Access Act of 

2019. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. RETROACTIVE ACCESS TO SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY 

BENEFITS INDIVIDUALS WITH AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL 

SCLEROSIS (ALS). 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2(b) of the ALS Disability Insurance 

Access Act of 2019 (Public Law 116–250) is amended by striking 

‘‘applications for disability insurance benefits filed after the date 

of enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘applications for disability 

insurance benefits approved after the date that is 5 months before 

the date of enactment of this Act’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by this section 

shall take effect as if included in the enactment of the ALS Disability Insurance Access Act of 2019 (Public Law 116–250). 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-61282-SMITH/VALLE

RIGOBERTO SERRANO, and 

other similarly situated individuals,

Plaintiff,

v.

TWIN STONE DESIGNS AND 

INSTALLATION, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN FLSA CASE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon United States District Judge Rodney Smith’s Order 

referring the case to the undersigned for an early settlement conference. See (ECF No. 7). 

Accordingly, a settlement conference will be held on Tuesday, November 17, 2020 at

10:00 a.m. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the conference will be conducted remotely by video 

or telephone conferencing. The day before the conference, the Court will advise the parties of the 

selected method to conduct the proceedings. ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE 

ATTORNEYS MUST PARTICIPATE WITH FULL AUTHORITY TO SETTLE THIS 

ACTION. All attendees should allocate a minimum of three hours for the conference.

By Monday, November 9, 2020, each party shall: (i) file a certificate of compliance 

confirming that all documents supporting the claims and defenses, including time sheets, pay stubs, 

etc., have been exchanged and reviewed; and (ii) email (not file) a Confidential Settlement 

Conference Statement to Judge Valle at valle@flsd.uscourts.gov. Each Statement shall not exceed 

five (5) double-spaced pages. Plaintiff’s Confidential Settlement Statement must also specify 

Case 0:20-cv-61282-AOV Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

counsel’s hours, billing rate(s), total attorney’s fees, and costs incurred through the date of the 

submission, including billing records to support the fees and costs incurred.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on September 25,

2020.

__________________________________

ALICIA O. VALLE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

cc: U.S. District Judge Rodney Smith

All Counsel of Record

Case 0:20-cv-61282-AOV Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 2 of 2
1

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-123 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, September 17, 1996)

NRC CONSIDERS APPLICATION FOR OFF-SITE

SPENT FUEL STORAGE LICENSE FOR MINNESOTA NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is reviewing an

application from Northern States Power Company (NSP) for a

license to store nuclear power plant spent fuel in a facility

that NSP proposes to construct and operate in Goodhue County,

Minnesota. The agency is offering an opportunity for a public

hearing on the license application.

The proposed facility would store uranium fuel that has been

irradiated in the process of producing electricity at the Prairie

Island Nuclear Power Plant in nearby Welch, Minnesota.

The NRC previously licensed NSP to store up to 48 dry casks

containing spent fuel on-site at the Prairie Island plant.

However, a Minnesota law requires NSP to develop an off-site

facility for fuel storage.

The NRC will review NSP’s application to determine whether

storage of the spent fuel in the proposed off-site independent

spent fuel storage installation in Florence Township of Goodhue

County will provide reasonable protection of public health and

safety and the common defense and security. In the course of

this review, the agency will prepare an environmental impact

statement.

Any person whose interest may be affected by this proceeding

and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding may

file a written request for a hearing and a petition to intervene.

The petition should explain in detail how the petitioner’s

interest would be affected and identify the specific aspects on

which the petitioner wishes to intervene. NSP may also file a

request for a hearing.

Specific requirements for petitioning are described in a

Federal Register notice published on September 17. The request

must be filed by October 17 (30 days after the Federal Register

notice) with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Attention: Docketing
2

and Services Branch. Further details on filing requirements and

options are contained in the Federal Register notice.

If timely requests are received, an NRC Atomic Safety and

Licensing Board will be designated to rule on them and to conduct

a hearing, if one is held.

Copies of the application for a license and related

materials are available for review in a temporary local public

document room that has been recently established in the Red Wing

Public Library, 225 East Avenue, Red Wing, Minnesota. In

addition, the same documents are available for review and copying

at the existing local public document room for the Prairie Island

nuclear power plant located at the Minneapolis Public Library,

Technology and Science Department, 300 Nicollet Mall,

Minneapolis, and at the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street,

N.W., Washington, D.C.

###
CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the
dates and periods covered by the Report.
  /s/ Kathy R. Wehmeir-DavisMay 6, 2009
    Kathy R. Wehmeir-DavisPrincipal Accounting Officer
#### William H. HARVEY, a/k/a Jameel Ali, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-6059.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 23, 2002.

William H. Harvey, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

William H. Harvey seeks to appeal the distinct court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 *&*Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Harvey v. Angelone,*No. CA-01-943-AM (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 10, 2001; entered Dec. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 23 -- CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  to  the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8, File Number  333-68837,  of our report dated February 19,
1999, on the consolidated  financial  statements of Union Community  Bancorp and
subsidiary,  Crawfordsville,  Indiana, which report is incorporated by reference
in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Union  Community  Bancorp and  subsidiary,
Crawfordsville, Indiana.



/s/ Olive LLP


Indianapolis, Indiana
March 30, 1999
Granular Bayluscide Treatments

• TFM is used in lotic conditions – pumps used to 

deliver lampricide to flowing water that carries 

“bank” downstream

• Granular Bayluscide is used in lentic areas –

lampricide sprayed over infested area, sinks to 

bottom, and dissolves

• Larvae infest some lentic areas during periods of 

high discharge (lentics associated with streams)

• Largest lentic areas are interconnecting waterways

(St. Marys, St. Clair rivers)

1
Assessment of Lentic Areas

• Lentic areas are assessed with 500 m2 plots or 

deep water electrofisher

• Larvae collected with scap nets for one hour

• Provides larval size structure and distribution

• Habitat defined with dredge or RoxAnn TM

• Habitat maps help define larval distribution

2
Depth of granular Bayluscide 

Treatments

• Most lentic treatments occur along or over 

drop-offs ranging from 2-30 feet

• Treatments are commonly conducted in the 

St. Marys River at depths ranging up to 60 feet

• Use of granular Bayluscide is thought to be 

ineffective at depths greater than 90 feet

3
Preliminary Data

• Delineate area with GPS coordinates

– (buoys or computer program)

• Survey area for non-targets

• Survey area for weeds and obstructions

• Measure DO and temperature

4
Treatment of Lentic Areas

5

• Fill hopper with granular Bayluscide

• Apply with spreader or sprayer

• Survey area for non-targets and larvae 
0

4 4

6

3

11 12

17

2

0

1

8

2

4

11

9

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Number of lentic areas treated 

by country 

US

Canada
14

16

10

4 4

9

4

9

6

9

6

3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0-5 5.01-10 10.01-20 20.01-30 30.01-40 40

Number of granular Bayluscide lentic treatments by area (acres)

US

Canada

5

13

20

41

76

52

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0-5 5.01-10 10.01-20 20.01-20 30.01-40 40-256

Number of granular Bayluscide treatments in St. Marys River by 

area (acres); 2003-2011

Acre range
HomeAbout NRCCareer OpportunitiesWorking at NRCNRC Ethics

# Other Ethics Sites

For further information regarding ethical conduct, you may wish to explore one of the following web sites.

The following links to non-NRC servers and websites are provided solely as a reference for the convenience of users. NRC cannot guarantee the authenticity of documents or the validity of information obtained at these non-NRC websites. See our Site Disclaimer for more information.

## Federal Government Sites

        - Office of Government Ethics
        - Office of Special Counsel (Hatch Act)
        - Department of Justice- Office of Legal Counsel

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, February 15, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Summaries of Major Ethics Rules
          - Laws, Regulations and Policies
          - Ethics Forms
          - Ethics Program Reviews
          - List of Prohibited Securities
          - Other Ethics Sites

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, February 15, 2022
#### Max Chasen, Appellant, v. Astoria Light, Heat and Power Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., not voting.
**EXHIBIT
32.2**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**
 **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Insightful
Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the undersigned, Richard
Barber, Chief Financial Officer of Insightful Corporation, does hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 3)
    such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 4)
    the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Insightful
      Corporation.
 
 
 Date:
    May
      10, 2005
    
    By:
    /s/
      Richard P. BarberRichard
      P. BarberChief
      Financial Officer
      (Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
§ 142.6 What does the phrase “know or have reason to know” mean? A person knows or has reason to know (that a claim or statement is false) if the person: ( a ) Has actual knowledge that the claim or statement is false, fictitious, or fraudulent; or
( b ) Acts in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the claim or statement; or
( c ) Acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the claim or statement.