alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.916 Effects of OHA's decision. ( a ) If OHA grants a Size Standard Petition of a modified or revised size standard, SBA will take appropriate action to rescind that size standard and to restore the one that was in effect before the one challenged in the Size Standard Petition. The restored size standard will remain in effect until SBA issues a new size standard. The OHA decision does not affect the validity of a concern's size representation made under the challenged size standard prior to the effective date of the SBA action rescinding that challenged size standard. Such a concern remains eligible for award as a small business, and the procuring agency may count the award towards its small business goals. If the procuring agency amends the solicitation and requires new self-certifications, those self-certifications will be based on the size standard in effect on the day those self-certifications are made. If the size standard in question was newly established, the challenged size standard remains in effect while SBA conducts its further analysis on remand.
( b ) If OHA denies a Size Standard Petition, the size standard remains as published in the Code of Federal Regulations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                          30,393
<SECURITIES>                                   817,689
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,571
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               874,070
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 874,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          746,514
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       282,942
<OTHER-SE>                                    (155,385)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   874,070
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,343
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,384
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             154,757
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (80,272)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (80,272)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (80,272)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (4.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.16)
        


</TABLE>
§ 63.12 Setback and community flood plain management requirements. ( a ) Where benefits have been paid under section 1306(c) of the Act, the setback requirements in section 1306(c)(5) of the Act, which if not met result in a prohibition against subsequently providing flood insurance or assistance under the Disaster Relief Act of 1974, shall apply: ( 1 ) To the structure involved wherever it is located, and
( 2 ) To any other structure subsequently constructed on or moved to the parcel of land on which the structure involved was located when the claim under section 1306(c) of the Act arose.
( b ) In addition, any structures relocated under section 1306 of the Act must comply with the flood plain management criteria set forth in § 60.3 of this chapter.
### §124. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 124 was editorially reclassified as section 5606 of this title.
#### § 3921.20 Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act.

Before the BLM will offer a tract for competitive lease sale under subpart 3924, the BLM must prepare a NEPA analysis of the proposed lease area under 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508 either separately or in conjunction with a land use planning action.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Louis LeCalsey, III, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tufco Technologies, Inc., certifythat:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tufco Technologies, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 14, 2005   /s/ Louis LeCalsey, III    Louis LeCalsey, III  President and Chief Executive Officer  
16
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.1032 Corrected certification by U.S. exporters or producers.

Civil or administrative penalties provided for under 19 U.S.C. 1592 will not be imposed on an exporter or producer in the United States who promptly and voluntarily provides written notification pursuant to § 10.1009(b) with respect to the making of an incorrect certification.
§ 11.9 Special marking on certain articles. ( a ) No movement, case, or dial provided for in Chapter 91, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), shall be released for consumption until marked in exact compliance with the requirements of additional U.S. Note 4, Chapter 91. If any article so required to be marked is found not to be marked to indicate the country of origin, the 10 percent marking duty shall be assessed, unless such marking is accomplished or the merchandise is exported or destroyed under Customs supervision prior to the liquidation of the entry, in accordance with the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 1304(f).
( b ) The name of the manufacturer or purchaser which must appear on articles provided for Chapter 91, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), and specified in Additional U.S. Note 4, Chapter 91, may be either the actual name of the manufacturer or purchaser or a duly registered trade name under which such manufacturer or purchaser carries on his business. A trade-mark shall not be accepted as meeting any such special marking requirement unless it includes the full name of the manufacturer or purchaser. The term “Purchaser” as used in this paragraph means the purchaser in the United States by whom or for whose account the articles are imported.
[28 FR 14701, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51253, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 90-51, 55 FR 28190, July 10, 1990; T.D. 97-82, 62 FR 51770, Oct. 3, 1997; 62 FR 55512, Oct. 27, 1997]
§ 1.4 Public rulemaking docket. ( a ) FEMA maintains a public docket for each rulemaking after it is published in the Federal Register and until the rulemaking is closed and archived at the National Archives and Records Administration. The public docket includes every document published in the Federal Register in conjunction with a rulemaking. It also includes regulatory assessments and analyses, written comments from the public addressed to the merits of a proposed rule, comments from the public received in response to notices, or to withdrawals or terminations of a proposed rulemaking, requests for a public meeting, requests for extension of time, petitions for rulemaking, grants or denials of petitions or requests, and transcripts or minutes of informal hearings. The public rulemaking docket is maintained by the Regulatory Affairs Division, Office of Chief Counsel.
( b ) After FEMA establishes a public rulemaking docket, any person may examine docketed material during established business hours by prearrangement with the Regulatory Affairs Division, Office of Chief Counsel, FEMA, 500 C St. SW, Washington, DC 20472, and may obtain a copy of any docketed material (except for copyrighted material). FEMA also maintains a copy of each public docket electronically, with the exception of copyrighted material, on *www.regulations.gov .* To access the docket on *www.regulations.gov ,* search for the docket ID associated with the rulemaking.
( c ) The docket for flood hazard elevation rules issued by the National Flood Insurance Program are partially maintained at the locality that is the subject of the rule. FEMA includes in the preamble of each flood hazard elevation rule the repository address for supporting material.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-205 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, November 10, 1998)

STATUS OF NRC OSRE PROGRAM

After a series of internal briefings and discussions, Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson of the

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) today directed the NRC staff to reinstate its program

for Operational Safeguards Response Evaluations (OSREs) at nuclear power plants, effective

immediately. The initial focus of the program will be to complete OSREs at the 11 facilities that

have not received this evaluation to date. The Chairman stated, further that:

 The purpose of NRC oversight in this area is to test the actual efficacy of licensee

programs relative to NRC regulatory requirements;

 In parallel with continuing the OSRE program, the NRC would accelerate an ongoing

study to determine the proper level of performance testing appropriate to ensure that

nuclear power plants can withstand the design basis threat, as defined in NRC security

requirements;

 The NRC staff also would initiate an evaluation of the adequacy of existing NRC

regulations in this area; and

 Results of these studies, as well as the results from past and future OSREs, would be

incorporated into the new NRC risk-informed baseline inspection program currently

under development.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-61380-CIV-SMITH

KIBAKA LANDU,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

GOD’S VIP SENIOR

HAVEN, LTD., et al.,

Defendants. 

 /

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

AND DISMISSING CASE

This matter is before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 

to District Judge [DE 44], in which she recommends approving the settlement agreement between 

Plaintiff and God’s Senior Haven, Ltd, et al and dismissing the case against God’s Senior Haven, 

Ltd, et al with prejudice. No objections have been filed. Having reviewed, de novo, the Report of 

Magistrate Judge and the record, and given that there are no objections, it is

ORDERED that:

1) The Report and Recommendation to District Judge [DE 43] is AFFIRMED and 

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this Court’s Order.

2) The Joint Motion for Approval of Parties’ Settlement Agreement and Dismissal 

with Prejudice [DE 43] is GRANTED. The Settlement Agreement is approved. 

3) All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

4) Defendants God’s Senior Haven, Ltd, et al are DISMISSED with prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 27th day of January 2022.

cc: Counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-61380-RS Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/27/2022 Page 1 of 1
### §49l–1. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to enable the Secretary to provide funds through reimburseable 1 agreements with the States to operate statistical programs which are essential for development of estimates of the gross national product and other national statistical series, including those related to employment and unemployment.

(June 6, 1933, ch. 49, §14, as added Pub. L. 97–300, title VI, §601(h), formerly title V, §501(h), Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1397; renumbered title VI, §601(h), Pub. L. 100–628, title VII, §712(a)(1), (2), Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3248.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1983, but with Secretary authorized to use funds appropriated for fiscal 1983 to plan for orderly implementation of section, see section 181(i) of Pub. L. 97–300, which was formerly classified to section 1591(i) of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be "reimbursable".
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-136 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, September 17, 1997)

NRC WEB SITE GETS FACE LIFT; NEW FEATURES ADDED

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's internet web site has been given a face lift and

new features and resources have been added.

The NRC's home page is at <http://www.nrc.gov>.

The home page has a new graphical look that loads quickly and provides links to the

principal interest areas on the NRC web site.

New navigational aids help users move around the web site. An Excite search engine

allows searching the entire site and selected information areas. Also a listing provides site

contents and a "what's new" link shows new features.

A Reference Library has been added to provide access to significant NRC documents

and reference materials. The full text of NRC regulations -- Title 10 of the Code of Federal

Regulations -- is now in this reference library. The regulations will be updated periodically as

changes are made.

Other Reference Library documents for viewing on the web site or for downloading

include:

** NRC Information Digest, 1997 edition, with extensive background information and data on

NRC regulatory activities, nuclear power plants, use of radioactive materials, and

radioactive waste storage and disposal.

** General audience brochures on radioactive waste and use of radioactive materials

** Technical NRC documents on such topics as dry cask storage of spent fuel; equipment

testing at nuclear power plants; and portable gauges containing radiation sources.

** Transcripts of Commission meetings from 1991 to date.

Another addition to the web site is a School Programs page which features information

of use to teachers and students. This includes availability of a new video about the NRC.

The NRC web site continues to offer current information on NRC regulatory activities in

the safe use of radioactive materials, including nuclear power plants, nuclear medicine

program, industrial and commercial uses, and waste disposal. These information categories,

updated frequently, include:

** NRC news releases and speeches
** Nuclear power plant status, events reported by NRC licensees, and NRC daily staff reports.

** Enforcement actions

** Weekly information report from the staff to the Commission

** NRC Commission, Advisory Committee, and staff meetings open to the public

** Preliminary notifications (staff reports of item of NRC interest)

** Selected regulatory documents and reports

** Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance reports -- issued every 18-24 months on

the NRC's review of the performance of each operating nuclear power station.

The NRC staff welcomes suggestions and comments on the NRC web pages.

Comments can be sent by e-mail to nrcweb@nrc.gov or opa@nrc.gov.

#
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 19, 2017

a0516

Order 

Clerk

May 19, 2017

153531 & (121)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153531

COA: 320227

Wayne CC: 12-008886-FH

DAVID BENJAMIN DUNN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to add issue is GRANTED. The application for 

leave to appeal the February 23, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, 

and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be 

reviewed by this Court. The denial is without prejudice to the defendant’s right to file a 

motion for relief from judgment pursuant to MCR Subchapter 6.500 that may include the 

issue whether the prosecution presented sufficient evidence to support the charge of 

conspiracy to commit perjury. MCL 750.157a and MCL 750.422.

WILDER, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 00-010

January 13, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, FEBRUARY 2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

(ACRS) has scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on planning and procedures on

February 2 in Rockville, Maryland.

The subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related matters.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B1 of the

agency’s Two White Flint North Building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, from 1:00 p.m. until the

conclusion of business. A portion of the meeting will be closed to discuss organizational and

other matters.

Those who seek additional information on the meeting or schedule changes should

contact John Larkins, at 301-415-7360.

Other aspects of the meeting will be described in an upcoming edition of the Federal

Register. ACRS meeting notices, transcripts and letter reports are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

###
### part 2—participation and vesting
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-73 April 24, 2000

Nuclear Regulatory Commission to Discuss Staff Recommendation to Renew

Oconee Nuclear Station Licenses

On May 2, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will discuss the staff's recommendation to

renew the operating licenses for the three-unit Oconee Nuclear Station for an additional 20 years. The

meeting, which is open to public observation, will be held at 9:30 a.m. in the Commissioners'

Conference Room at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

Duke Energy Corporation submitted an application to the NRC in July 1998 to renew the

licenses for Oconee Nuclear Station Units 1, 2 and 3 for another 20 years after the current licenses

expire on February 6, 2013, for Unit 1; October 6, 2013, for Unit 2: and July 19, 2014, for Unit 3. The

three Oconee nuclear power plants are located near Seneca, South Carolina.

The NRC reviewed the license renewal application in accordance with Parts 51 and 54 of Title

10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The NRC's environmental review, under Part

51, is described in a site specific supplement to the NRC's "Generic Environmental Impact

Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants, Regarding the Oconee Nuclear Station, Final

Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 2) .” In this Final Environmental Impact Statement issued last

December, the staff concluded there are no impacts that would preclude renewal of the licenses for

environmental reasons.

In the "Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Oconee Nuclear Station,

Units 1, 2 and 3," (NUREG-1723) issued in March, the staff concluded that there are no safety

concerns that would preclude renewal of the licenses because the licensee had demonstrated the

capability to manage the effects of plant aging.

Several inspections of the plant also were conducted to verify information submitted by the

licensee. On March 13, the NRC's Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards -- an independent

body of technical experts that advises the Commission -- issued its recommendation to the

Commission that the operating licenses for Oconee be renewed. That recommendation is contained in

the ACRS "Report on the Safety Aspects of the License Renewal Application for Oconee Nuclear

Station, Units 1, 2 and 3."

Copies of these documents and others relating to the license renewal application will be

available at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports/renewal.htm on the NRC's web site. A copy of
the staff's recommendation on the renewal of the Oconee licenses also will be available in

the NRC Public Document Room at 2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20555; telephone

(202) 634-3273 and will be posted at the same web site.

###