alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1606. Penalties

#### (a) Civil penalty

Whoever knowingly fails to—

(1) remedy a defective filing within 60 days after notice of such a defect by the Secretary of the Senate or the Clerk of the House of Representatives; or

(2) comply with any other provision of this chapter;

shall, upon proof of such knowing violation by a preponderance of the evidence, be subject to a civil fine of not more than $200,000, depending on the extent and gravity of the violation.

#### (b) Criminal penalty

Whoever knowingly and corruptly fails to comply with any provision of this chapter shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years or fined under title 18, or both.

(Pub. L. 104–65, §7, Dec. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 699; Pub. L. 110–81, title II, §211(a), Sept. 14, 2007, 121 Stat. 749.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act" meaning Pub. L. 104–65, Dec. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 691, known as the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2007—Pub. L. 110–81 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, substituted "$200,000" for "$50,000" in concluding provisions, and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2007 Amendment

Pub. L. 110–81, title II, §211(b), Sept. 14, 2007, 121 Stat. 749, provided that: "The amendments made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to any violation committed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 14, 2007]."

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, see section 24 of Pub. L. 104–65, set out as a note under section 1601 of this title.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Erwin Wagner, as President of Fur Merchants Employees Union, Local No. 64, International Fur & Leather Workers Union, C.I.O., Respondent, and Morris Kopit, Doing Business as M. Kopit Company, Appellant.

Order unanimously modified in the exercise of discretion by striking out the allowance for costs and disbursements and as so modified affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements of this appeal to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
114 STAT. 1286 PUBLIC LAW 106–320—OCT. 19, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2938 (S. 2804):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

June 20, considered and passed House.

Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–320

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 424 South

Michigan Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the ‘‘John Brademas Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

424 South Michigan Street in South Bend, Indiana, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘John Brademas Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John Brademas

Post Office’’.

Approved October 19, 2000.

Oct. 19, 2000

[H.R. 2938]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-98-42 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Monday, June 1, 1998)

NRC SCHEDULES MEETING WITH FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT

TO DISCUSS RECENT PERFORMANCE OF ST. LUCIE PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting with Florida

Power & Light officials to discuss the status of recent St. Lucie nuclear plant performance.

The meeting will be Wednesday, June 10, at 10:00 a.m. in the St. Lucie Training Center,

Room 123. The training center can be reached through gate B at the plant site located off

Highway A1A on Hutchinson Island.

Reporters and photographers are welcome to attend, along with members of the public,

for purposes of observation. NRC officials will be available to meet with reporters at the

conclusion of the meeting to answer questions related to the discussion.

###
```

[House Report 109-181]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

109th Congress                                            Rept. 109-181
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     Part 2

======================================================================

 
                         527 REFORM ACT OF 2005

                                _______
                                

 September 22, 2005.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on 
            the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

  Mr. Ney, from the Committee on House Administration, submitted the 
                               following

                          SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

                        [To accompany H.R. 513]

  On July 22, 2005, the Committee on House Administration filed 
House Report 109-181, Part 1, relating to H.R. 513, the ``527 
Reform Act of 2005''. In the report, erroneous language appears 
under the heading ``Committee Record Votes'' as it relates to 
the manner in which the bill was reported by the Committee. 
This supplemental report contains the correct language, as well 
as a correction to the heading for the portion of the report on 
the views of the minority.
  Strike the paragraph describing the second recorded vote and 
the accompanying table (page 12). In the next paragraph, strike 
``The Committee then voted to favorably report H.R. 513, as 
amended. The vote to report favorably was approved by a 
recorded vote (5-3).'' and insert ``The Committee then voted to 
report H.R. 513, as amended, to the House without 
recommendation by a recorded vote (5-3).''.
  At the beginning of the portion of the report on minority 
views (page 53), strike ``MINORITY VIEWS'' and insert 
``MINORITY VIEWS OF RANKING MEMBER JUANITA MILLENDER-MCDONALD, 
REPRESENTATIVE ROBERT A. BRADY, AND REPRESENTATIVE ZOE 
LOFGREN''.

                                  

```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1996 (Unaudited) and the Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the six months ended December 31, 1996 (Unaudited)
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                     
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          4,795,375
<SECURITIES>                                    5,950,680
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,989,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                       61,500
<INVENTORY>                                        74,334
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13,880,250
<PP&E>                                          1,918,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                    703,405
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 23,159,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,848,923
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           95,221
<OTHER-SE>                                     17,570,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   23,159,140
<SALES>                                        18,509,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,203,801
<CGS>                                          11,726,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,726,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                5,080,635
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  3,485
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,904,437
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,113,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,791,437
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,791,437
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.18
                                                                      


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.2032 Corrected certification by U.S. exporters or producers.

Civil or administrative penalties provided for under 19 U.S.C. 1592 will not be imposed on an exporter or producer in the United States who promptly and voluntarily provides written notification pursuant to § 10.2009(b) with respect to the making of an incorrect certification.
No. 89-6479.

#### Suttles, Administratrix of the Estate of Suttles *v.*City of Chattanooga et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### §465. Report to Congress

The Secretary shall submit to the Congress at the expiration of three years from September 14, 1959, a report upon the operation of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 86–257, title III, §305, Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 532.)
#### §§ 136.131-136.139 [Reserved]
### §163. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 423, §7, 43 Stat. 1108, which required the Library of Congress Trust Fund Board to submit an annual report to Congress on moneys or securities received and held and operations, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, page 10 of House Document No. 103–7.
### §1919. Dismissal for lack of jurisdiction

Whenever any action or suit is dismissed in any district court, the Court of International Trade, or the Court of Federal Claims for want of jurisdiction, such court may order the payment of just costs.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 955; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §510, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1743; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §908(a), (b)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4519.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §80 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §37, 36 Stat. 1098).

Words "dismissed for want of jurisdiction" were substituted for "it shall appear to the satisfaction of the said district court, at any time after such suit has been brought or removed thereto, that such suit does not really and substantially involve a dispute or controversy properly within the jurisdiction of said district court". The substituted language is sufficient. (See reviser's note under section 1359 of this title.) The provisions of section 80 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to dismissal for improper or collusive joinder in removal proceedings, are incorporated in section 1359 of this title. Other provisions of section 80 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., appear in section 1447 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "Dismissal" for "District courts; dismissal" in section catchline and inserted reference to Court of Federal Claims in text.

1980—Pub. L. 96–417 included dismissals in Court of International Trade for want of jurisdiction.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 applicable with respect to civil actions commenced on or after Nov. 1, 1980, see section 701(b)(1)(E) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-20-00366-CV

Ana GUERRA and Miguel Guerra,

Appellants

v.

Copernicus GUERRA, Eric Stubbs and Monica Guerra,

Appellees

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-17589

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellants Ana Guerra and Miguel Guerra. 

SIGNED March 9, 2022.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
### §1110. Appropriations

There is appropriated to the fund the sum of $7,500,000 to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 100–458, title I, §121, Oct. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2176.)
DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO

N FEDERA L AVIATIO

N ADMINISTRATIO

N ^„ , .. . . . _. _ ^ mAU G 2 3 P 2 : 2

M OFFICE O

F HEARINGS V ^ ^ ':: : L ^ C T l /

5

- f WASHINGTON , D.C

.



### : AiKLl ? 201 0 I n th e Matte

r o f Cenogenic s Corporation 

### HEAR^^' G DOCKE T 2009EA70039 2 , ^ , Judg e Not Assigned|C^l O eRC^Oli' T |ffP^,,5_o/ 0 -675<

-
NOTICE O

FAPPEARANC

E Complainant , Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , hereby notifie s th e UnitedState s Departmen

t o f Transportation , Offic

e o f Hearings , an

dthe Respondent , pursuan t t o 1 4 C.F.R

. §13.204(b),tha

t it shall b e represente di

n th e above-state dactio n b y th e followin

g attorney : Jeanin e C , Gotime r Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Office o f Regiona l Counse l 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N

Y 1143 4 Telephone : 71 8 553-327 2 Facsimile : 71 8 995-569 9 Al l communications , notices , pleading s o r documents ar

e respectfull

y requestedt

o b e forwardeda s follows :

Jeanin e C

. Gotime

r Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Office o f Regiona l Counse l 1 Aviation Plaz aJamaica , N Y 1143 4 Telephone : 71 8 553-327 2 Facsimile : 71 8 995-569 9 Respectfull y submitted , AlfiredR

. Johnson , Jr

. Regiona l Counse l

By : A f

V >A^^ i ^.vou

. Dated:_^:MJLli A JcMiine C

. Gotime r Attorne y CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t o n thi s da

y copie s o f

th e foregoin g Notic e o f

Appearanc e wer e place d i n th e Unite dState s mail , postag e prepaid

. Certifie dMai l - Return Receip t Requeste d addresse da s follows : Michae l Katz , Presiden t Cenogenic s Corp

. 10 0 Rout e 520 , Drawe r

30 8 Morganville,N J 0775 1 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (Origina l an don e copy ) 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W

. Washington , D.C

. 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Roo m201 4 AU G ] ] 20) 0 ^ P Mariann aPerer o Paralega l Specialis t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o f Regiona l Counse l 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4
### §162. Offenses and penalties

Any person who shall willfully resist, prevent, impede, or interfere with any member of the Board or any of its agents or agencies in the performance of duties pursuant to this subchapter shall be punished by a fine of not more than $5,000 or by imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.

(July 5, 1935, ch. 372, §12, 49 Stat. 456; June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title I, §101, 61 Stat. 151.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1947—Act June 23, 1947, reenacted section without change.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1947 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by act June 23, 1947, see section 104 of act June 23, 1947, set out as a note under section 151 of this title.
### Part C—American Indian Vocational Rehabilitation Services
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Patrick L. BARK, Appellant.

No. 01-3783.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 20, 2002.

Decided May 29, 2002.

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On appeal from the district court’s * revocation of Patrick L. Bark’s supervised release and imposition of an additional term of imprisonment, Bark’s counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although Bark was granted permission to file a supplemental brief, he has not done so.

Having reviewed counsel’s *Anders*brief, we reject counsel’s argument that the district court abused its discretion by imposing imprisonment in excess of the Chapter 7 Sentencing Guidelines range and by not considering the severity of Bark’s medical condition. (Bark testified he needed double knee replacements and had been unable to have the surgery in prison.) The Chapter 7 ranges are merely advisory, *see United States v. Holmes,*283 F.3d 966, 968 (8th Cir.2002), and the district court-which was fully apprised of Barks’s medical condition-was not required to impose a lesser sentence on that basis. Indeed, the district court considered the Chapter 7 policy statements and believed the Guidelines range was inadequate to promote respect for the law, afford adequate deterrents to criminal conduct, and protect the public from further crimes.

Having reviewed the record independently, we find no other nonfrivolous issues for appeal. *See Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We thus affirm the district court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

A true copy.

*

 The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
§ 6.85 Reproduction fees. ( a ) *Duplication costs.* ( 1 ) For copies of documents reproduced on a standard office copying machine in sizes up to 81 ⁄ 2 × 14 inches, the charge will be $.15 per page.
( 2 ) The fee for reproducing copies of records over 81 ⁄ 2 × 14 inches or whose physical characteristics do not permit reproduction by routine electrostatic copying shall be the direct cost of reproducing the records through Government or commercial sources. If FEMA estimates that the allowable duplication charges are likely to exceed $25, it shall notify the requester of the estimated amount of fees, unless the requester has indicated in advance his/her willingness to pay fees as high as those anticipated. Such a notice shall offer a requester the opportunity to confer with agency personnel with the objective of reformulating the request to meet his/her needs at a lower cost.
( 3 ) For other methods of reproduction or duplication, FEMA shall charge the actual direct costs of producing the document(s). If FEMA estimates that the allowable duplication charges are likely to exceed $25, it shall notify the requester of the estimated amount of fees, unless the requester has indicated in advance his/her willingness to pay fees as high as those anticipated. Such a notice shall offer a requester the opportunity to confer with agency personnel with the objective of reformulating the request to meet his/her needs at a lower cost.
( b ) Interest may be charge to those requesters who fail to pay fees charged. FEMA may begin assessing interest charges on the amount billed starting on the 31st day following the day on which the billing was sent. Interest will be at the rate prescribed in section 3717 of title 31 U.S.C.
[52 FR 13679, Apr. 24, 1987]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-186 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, October 14, 1998)

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor

Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a technical meeting November 4-7 in Rockville,

Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in conference room 2B3 of

the NRC’s Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike.

Here is the complete meeting agenda:

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4

1:00 to 1:15 p.m. -- Opening remarks by the ACRS Chairman

1:15 to 3:15 p.m. -- Proposed rule on the use of revised source term at operating

plant/pilot application of revised source term at the Perry nuclear plant;

3:30 to 5:00 p.m. -- Assessment of pressurized water reactor primary systems leaks;

5:15 to 7:00 p.m. -- Preparation of ACRS reports;

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5

8:30 to 8:35 a.m. -- Opening remarks by the ACRS Chairman;

8:35 to 10:00 a.m. -- Options to revise the enforcement policy;

10:15 to 11:45 a.m. -- NRC staff’s evaluation of the Westinghouse Owners Group

topical report on risk-informed in-service inspection of piping;

12:45 p.m. to 3:15 p.m. -- Discussion of items for meeting with the Commission;

3:30 to 7:00 p.m. -- Preparation of ACRS reports;
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 6

8:30 to 8:35 a.m. -- Opening remarks by the ACRS Chairman;

8:35 to 10:00 a.m. -- Inspection procedures for graded quality assurance;

10:15 to 11:45 a.m. -- Salem nuclear plant units 1 and 2 (issues related to the shutdown

and resolution of issues prior to restart);

12:45 p.m. to 1:45 p.m. -- Report of the Planning and Procedures Subcommittee;

1:45 to 2:30 p.m. -- Future ACRS activities;

2:45 to 3:00 p.m. -- Reconciliation of ACRS comments and recommendations;

3:00 to 7:00 p.m. -- Preparation of ACRS reports.

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 7

8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. -- Preparation of ACRS reports;

3:00 to 3:30 p.m. -- Miscellaneous

Although meetings of the ACRS are open, they are not part of the NRC’s public

hearing process. The ACRS, an advisory group to the Commission, conducts

independent, highly technical reviews of safety considerations related to nuclear

facilities. While anyone may attend, the committee will consider only oral or written

statements arranged in advance and limited to specific matters set forth in a Notice of

Meeting published in an upcoming edition of the Federal Register.

The meeting may include closed sessions, if required, to discuss proprietary or

personnel information.

###
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000399

27-JUL-2016

08:00 AM
Placeholder: confidential business information item

CBI Memo from IC F International on 10 -25 -2013 For more information please contact David Donaldson by phone at 202 - 343 - 9086 or b y email at donaldson.david@epa.gov .