alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### General Services Administration

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - 48 CFR Part 52 
          - [FAR Case 2002-024 Correction] 
          - RIN 9000-AJ80 

# AGENCIES:

Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 

# ACTION:

Correction. 

# SUMMARY:

The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council are issuing a correction to the proposed rule issued as FAR case 2002-024, Electronic Representations and Certifications, to correct an amendatory instruction. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Laurie Duarte at (202) 501-4755, General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat, Washington, DC 20405. 

## Correction 

In the proposed rule document appearing at 69 FR 4012, January 27, 2004, on page 4015, first column, amendatory instruction 9 is corrected to read as follows: “Amend section 52.212-3 by revising the date of the provision; adding an introductory paragraph; and adding paragraph (j) to read as follows:” 

Dated: January 29, 2004. 

Ralph De Stefano, 

Acting Director, Acquisition Policy Division. 

[FR Doc. 04-2348 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
§ 9.6 Decision-making process. ( a ) *Purpose.* This section sets out the floodplain management and wetlands protection decision-making process to be followed by the Agency in applying the Orders to its actions. The numbering of Steps 1 through 8 does not require that the steps be followed sequentially. As information is gathered through the decision-making process, and as additional information is needed, reevaluation of lower numbered steps may be necessary.
( b ) *Decision-making process.* Except as otherwise provided in § 9.5 regarding categories of partial or total exclusion when proposing an action, the Agency shall apply the 8-step decision-making process. FEMA shall: ( 1 ) *Step 1.* Determine whether the proposed action is located in a floodplain and/or a wetland as established by § 9.7; and whether it has the potential to affect or be affected by a floodplain or wetland (see § 9.7);
( 2 ) *Step 2.* Notify the public at the earliest possible time of the intent to carry out an action in a floodplain or wetland, and involve the affected and interested public in the decision-making process (see § 9.8);
( 3 ) *Step 3.* Identify and evaluate practicable alternatives to locating the proposed action in a floodplain or wetland (including alternative sites, actions, natural features, nature-based approaches, and the “no action” option) (see § 9.9). If a practicable alternative exists outside the floodplain or wetland FEMA must locate the action at the alternative site.
( 4 ) *Step 4.* Identify the potential direct and indirect impacts associated with the occupancy or modification of floodplains and wetlands and the potential direct and indirect support of floodplain and wetland development that could result from the proposed action (see § 9.10);
( 5 ) *Step 5.* Minimize the potential adverse impacts to or within floodplains and wetlands and minimize support of floodplain and wetland development identified under Step 4. Restore and preserve the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains, and preserve and enhance the natural and beneficial values served by wetlands. Integrate nature-based approaches where appropriate (see § 9.11);
( 6 ) *Step 6.* Reevaluate the proposed action to determine first, if it is still practicable in light of its exposure to flood hazards, the extent to which it will aggravate hazards to others, and its potential to disrupt floodplain and wetland values; and second, if alternatives preliminarily rejected at Step 3 are practicable in light of the information gained in Steps 4 and 5. FEMA shall not act in a floodplain or wetland unless it is the only practicable location (*see* § 9.9);
( 7 ) *Step 7.* Prepare and provide the public with a finding and public explanation of any final decision that the floodplain or wetland is the only practicable alternative (see § 9.12); and
( 8 ) *Step 8.* Review the implementation and post-implementation phases of the proposed action to ensure that the requirements stated in § 9.11 are fully implemented. Oversight responsibility shall be integrated into existing processes.
[89 FR 57041, July 11, 2024]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-113 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, August 5, 1997)

NRC TERMINATES LICENSE FOR

DECOMMISSIONED FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has terminated the

operating license of the decommissioned Fort St. Vrain Nuclear

Generating Station near Platteville, Colorado, and released the

site for unrestricted use, as requested by the licensee, Public

Service Company of Colorado.

The nuclear power plant, located 35 miles north of Denver,

received its operating license in 1973. It was a hightemperature, gas-cooled reactor, capable of producing 330

megawatts of electricity.

Public Service Company notified NRC in 1988 that it had

decided to halt Fort St. Vrain operations early because of high

operating costs and the plant’s frequent shutdowns. The company

closed the reactor permanently the following year. The NRC staff

in 1992 authorized decommissioning in accordance with the

utility’s plan. Decommissioning was completed last year.

NRC conducted 24 inspections while decommissioning was under

way at Fort St. Vrain. During the most recent ones, conducted

from February 1996 through January of this year, NRC reviewed the

licensee's final radiation survey results and performed

confirmatory surveys of its own.

NRC also published a notice offering an opportunity for a

hearing on the decommissioning project, but received no requests.

Neither were any comments or requests for a hearing received

during a public meeting held last December 3 in the plant

vicinity to discuss the termination of the license.

Based on the decommissioning activities conducted by the

licensee, NRC's review of the company's final radiation survey

report, and NRC inspections and confirmatory surveys, the agency

has concluded that the site and facility are suitable to be

released for unrestricted use.

Spent nuclear fuel from the Fort St. Vrain plant is stored

in an NRC-licensed independent spent fuel storage installation

located nearby.
###
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard 

          - [USCG-2004-19205] 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice of appointments. 

# SUMMARY:

The Coast Guard is providing notice of the appointment of 11 individuals to serve on its Performance Review Board. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ronald Kogut, Chief, Office of Civilian Personnel, (202) 267-0921. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Under 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the Coast Guard is required to publish the names of individuals appointed to serve on the Coast Guard Performance Review Board (CGPRB). The following 11 persons have been selected to serve on the CGPRB: 

Rear Admiral K.T. Venuto, Assistant Commandant for Human Resources, United States Coast Guard; 

Rear Admiral D.G. Gabel, Assistant Commandant for Acquisition, United States Coast Guard; 

Rear Admiral L.L. Hereth, Director of Port Security, United States Coast Guard; 

Rear Admiral R.D. Sirois, Assistant Commandant for Operations, United States Coast Guard; 

Rear Admiral J.C. Van Sice, Director of Reserve and Training, United States Coast Guard; 

Rear Admiral D.W. Kunkel, Director of Operations Capability, United States Coast Guard; 

Rear Admiral J.W. Underwood, Director of Operations Policy, United States Coast Guard; 

Rear Admiral E.M. Brown, Assistant Commandant for Systems, United States Coast Guard; 

Mr. John Matticks, Senior Planning Advisor, Federal Emergency Management Agency; 

Ms. Sheila Lumsden, Deputy Assistant Director for Human Resources and Training, U.S. Secret Service; and 

Mr. Sam Russ, Executive Director for Tactical Communications, U.S. Customs and Border Protection. 

Dated: October 15, 2004. 

Ronald Kogut, 

Chief, Office of Civilian Personnel. 

[FR Doc. 04-23565 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
No: II-23-021 June 16, 2023 

Contact: Dave Gasperson, 404-997-4417 

NRC Authorizes American Centrifuge Plant to Begin

High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium Demonstration Project

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has authorized American Centrifuge Operating LLC to

start up high-assay low-enriched uranium enrichment operations at the American Centrifuge Plant 

in Piketon, Ohio. This is the first step in demonstrating the production of HALEU for advanced 

fuels for the next generation of nuclear reactors.

The authorization allows the facility to enrich limited quantities of uranium in the form of 

uranium hexafluoride. The plant will need additional NRC inspections and authorization before 

further increasing the production of HALEU.

The ACP is currently the only facility licensed by the NRC to produce HALEU in the 

United States. 

“This authorization ensures the American Centrifuge Plant adheres to the NRC’s safety and 

regulatory guidelines," said NRC Region II Administrator Laura A. Dudes. “Authorizing the 

demonstration project moves the country closer to developing HALEU-based fuels for advanced 

reactors.”

The NRC's authorization was issued following operational readiness inspections of the 16-

centrifuge cascade, which were conducted to confirm that the facility had been constructed and will 

be operated safely and securely. Details of the inspections and the final authorization letter are 

available on the NRC website.
### §88. District of Columbia

The District of Columbia constitutes one judicial district.

Court shall be held at Washington.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 875.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

This section expressly makes the District of Columbia a judicial district of the United States.

Section 41 of this title also makes the District of Columbia a judicial circuit of the United States.

Section 11–305 of the District of Columbia Code, 1940 ed., provides that the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia shall possess the same powers and exercise the same jurisdiction as the district courts of the United States, and shall be deemed a court of the United States.

It is consonant with the ruling of the Supreme Court in O'Donoghue v. United States, 1933, 53 S.Ct. 740, 289 U.S. 516, 77 L.Ed. 1356, that the (then called) Supreme Court and Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia are constitutional courts of the United States, ordained and established under article III of the Constitution, Congress enacted that the Court of Appeals "shall hereafter be known as the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia" (Act of June 7, 1934, 48 Stat. 926); and also changed the name of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia to "district court of the United States for the District of Columbia" (Act of June 25, 1936, 49 Stat. 1921). In Federal Trade Commission v. Klesner, 1927, 47 S.Ct. 557, 274 U.S. 145, 71 L.Ed. 972, the Supreme Court ruled: "* * * The parallelism between the Supreme Court of the District [of Columbia] and the Court of Appeals of the District [of Columbia], on the one hand, and the district courts of the United States and the circuit courts of appeals, on the other, in the consideration and disposition of cases involving what among the States would be regarded as within Federal jurisdiction, is complete." See also to the same effect Clairborne-Annapolis Ferry Company v. United States, 1932, 52 S.Ct. 440, 285 U.S. 382, 76 L.Ed. 808.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-185 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, October 13, 1998)

NRC ORDER TO STP NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. CONFIRMS FIRE

BARRIER CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AT SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT, UNITS 1 AND 2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a confirmatory order to the STP

Nuclear Operating Company confirming its commitment to complete Thermo-Lag fire

barrier corrective actions at its South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2, by December 31.

The plant is located in Matagorda County, Texas.

In a letter to STP officials, Sam Collins, Director of the NRC’s Office of Nuclear

Reactor Regulation, said the order was issued because of concern “that some

licensees may not be making adequate progress toward resolving the plant-specific

issues, and that some implementation schedules may either be too tenuous or too

protracted.” The South Texas Project is among them.

Thermo-Lag is a fire barrier material manufactured and supplied by Thermal

Science, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, and has been used to provide fire resistance to

wiring and equipment at nuclear plants. The NRC has been concerned that ThermoLag 330-1 fire barrier material installed by some of its licensees may not provide the

intended level of fire protection and that licensees thus may not be meeting regulatory

requirements. Between 1992 and 1994, the NRC staff issued letters to all nuclear

utilities asking licensees to submit plans and schedules for resolving the issue. All

licensees with Thermo-Lag fire barriers have implemented around-the-clock “fire

watches,” using workers to patrol vital plant areas on a regular basis to watch for signs

of fire until corrective actions have been completed.

In his letter, Collins noted that NRC has been meeting with licensees to review

their progress in completing implementation of their fire barrier programs, but has been

concerned about slow progress on resolution of the issue at certain plants.

The STP Nuclear Operating Company is one of the licensees with which NRC

has held discussions. The NRC has reviewed the company’s schedule for Thermo-Lag

corrective actions and concluded they are reasonable. The company has formally

agreed to the terms of the confirmatory order. At South Texas, 88 percent of ThermoLag corrective actions have been completed at Unit 1, and 99 percent of the work at

Unit 2.
About 20 other plants have received similar orders.

##

Additional information on Thermo-Lag fire barriers can be be found on the NRC

Homepage at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/gmo/tip/tip9826.htm

##
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION OF THE
 PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Michael Edelhart., the Chief Executive Officer of LiveDeal, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of LiveDeal, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LiveDeal, Inc.
 
 Date: December 29, 2008
/s/ Michael EdelhartMichael EdelhartChief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 I, Gary L. Perschbacher, the Chief Financial Officer of LiveDeal, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of LiveDeal, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LiveDeal, Inc.
 
 Date: December 29, 2008
/s/ Gary L. PerschbacherGary L. PerschbacherChief Financial Officer
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

Walnut Creek Field Office

1450 Maria Lane, Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5378

Region IV 98-02 January 8, 1998

Mark Hammond 510-975-0254

NRC CHAIRMAN JACKSON AND INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR REGULATORS

SCHEDULE NEWS CONFERENCE IN LAS VEGAS

Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson, Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, will hold a news conference next week in Las Vegas, Nevada, during

a meeting of top officials of nuclear regulatory agencies in Canada, France,

Germany, Japan, Spain, Sweden, Britain, and the United States.

The news conference will be at 6 p.m. Monday, January 12, at the U.S.

Department of Energy’s Yucca Mountain Science Center, 4101 Meadows Lane, Las

Vegas. Chairman Jackson will make some brief introductory remarks and will

be available for questions along with the other international regulators.

The news conference will take place at the conclusion of a five-day

meeting of the International Nuclear Regulators Association (INRA). INRA

members are scheduled to spend January 12 touring Yucca Mountain, the site

northwest of Las Vegas being considered by the Department of Energy (DOE) as a

permanent repository for the spent fuel generated in U.S. commercial nuclear

reactors. NRC is the licensing agency for the repository, monitoring DOE’s

studies at Yucca Mountain.

Before touring Yucca Mountain, the INRA will convene at the NRC’s Region

IV Field office in Walnut Creek, California, and tour the DOE’s Lawrence

Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, California.

The five-day international meeting will continue discussions, from the

INRA’s inaugural meeting last May in Paris, on national trends in electric

generation and their effect on nuclear safety. It will also focus on how

national regulatory approaches impact nuclear safety and the identification of

key elements in nuclear safety regulation worldwide.

The INRA was created in May 1997 in an effort to enhance international

cooperation and communications and thereby improve nuclear safety and the

regulation of nuclear reactors and materials worldwide. Dr. Jackson is the

INRA Chairman.

The INRA meets twice a year. Besides Dr. Jackson, INRA members are:

Canada: Dr. Agnes Bishop, President and Chief Executive Officer,

Atomic Energy Control Board.

France: Andre-Claude Lacoste, Director, Directorate for the Safety

of Nuclear Installations.

Germany: Gerald Hennenhofer, Director-General for Nuclear Safety,

Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety

Japan: Yasumasa Togo, Chairman, Nuclear Safety Commission

Tomihiro Taniguchi, Deputy Director-General, Ministry of

International Trade and Industry
Spain: Dr. Juan Manuel Kindelan, President, Council for Nuclear

Safety

Sweden: Lars Hogberg, Director-General, Nuclear Power Inspectorate

Britain: Dr. Sam A. Harbison, Director and Chief Inspector, Nuclear

Installations Inspectorate, Health and Safety Executive
### SUBCHAPTER VI—INTERPARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS
EXHIBIT 12.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Naamit Salomon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the annual report on Form 20-F of
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: December 19, 2005

            /s/ Naamit Salomon
            ------------------
            Naamit Salomon
            Vice President, Finance
            (Principal Financial Officer)