alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,824
<SECURITIES>                                     3,435
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                        91
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,950
<PP&E>                                           3,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,579
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,222
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,579
<SALES>                                          8,478
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,774
<CGS>                                            5,355
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,877
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    727
<INCOME-TAX>                                       261
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                466
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       466
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

Walnut Creek Field Office, Region IV

1450 Maria Lane Walnut Creek California 94596

CONTACT: Mark Hammond

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

March 14, 1997

RIV-1897

Office: (510) 975-0254

Pager: (800) 916-4952

Breck Henderson

Office: (817) 860-8128

Pager: (817) 451-1302 (0655477)

NRC CHAIRMAN SHIRLEY ANN JACKSON

TO HOLD NEWS CONFERENCE IN RICHLAND

Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson, Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, will hold a news

conference on Thursday, March 20, at the Richland Federal Building, 825 Jadwin Ave. in Richland, Wash.

Dr. Jackson will speak with reporters at the end of a four-day trip to the Tri-Cities. She will visit the

WNP-2 commercial nuclear plant, the Department of Energy's Hanford site, Siemens Power Corp. and U.S.

Ecology. The NRC is becoming increasingly involved in certain DOE activities, including plans for

immobilization of high-level wastes at Hanford.

The news conference will begin at 3 p.m. in Room 147 of the Federal Building.

Dr. Jackson was sworn in as a Commissioner in May 1995 and became Chairman on July 1 of that year.

She has toured a number of nuclear power plants and NRC-licensed materials facilites in the U.S, as well as a

number of foreign nuclear facilities. A copy of her biography accompanies this announcement.
### §582. Assistant United States trustees

(a) The Attorney General may appoint one or more assistant United States trustees in any region when the public interest so requires.

(b) Each assistant United States trustee is subject to removal by the Attorney General.

(Added Pub. L. 95–598, title II, §224(a), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2663; amended Pub. L. 99–554, title I, §111(d), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3091.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 408(c) of Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, which provided for the repeal of this section and the deletion of any references to United States Trustees in this title at a prospective date, was repealed by section 307(b) of Pub. L. 99–554. See note set out preceding section 581 of this title.

#### Amendments

1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–554, §111(d)(1), substituted "region" for "district".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–554, §111(d)(2), struck out "for cause" after "removal".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–554 effective 30 days after Oct. 27, 1986, see section 302(a) of Pub. L. 99–554, set out as a note under section 581 of this title.

#### Appointment of United States Trustees by Attorney General

For sense of Congress concerning consideration of estate administrators under title 11 by the Attorney General for appointment under this section as U.S. trustee and assistant U.S. trustee, see section 309 of Pub. L. 99–554, set out as a note under section 581 of this title.
§ 130.810 SBA review authority. ( a ) *Site visits.* The AA/SBDC and designees will coordinate with, and provide written advance notice to, the SBDC Lead Center Director when conducting periodic programmatic visits to the recipient organization, Lead Center, SBDC service center organizations, and other service locations. ( 1 ) The programmatic reviews will incorporate District Office oversight which will include conducting yearly reviews.
( 2 ) Site visits may be incorporated into oversight and monitoring activities of the SBA program office or the SBA District Office.
( b ) *SBA examinations.* The SBA designees shall perform a biennial programmatic and financial examination of each SBDC network. The purpose of these visits is to verify compliance with the cooperative agreement, analyze, assess, and evaluate performance management regarding its SBDC activities, and if necessary, make recommendations for improved service delivery. See 15 U.S.C. 648(k)(1).
( c ) *Accreditation program.* ( 1 ) When extending or renewing a cooperative agreement of an SBDC, SBA shall consider the results of the examinations and accreditation reviews. See 15 U.S.C. 648(k)(3)(A). ( i ) The Small Business Act provides that the Administration may provide financial support, by contract or otherwise, to the association for the purpose of developing a SBDCs accreditation program. See 15 U.S.C. 648(k)(2).
( ii ) SBDC networks must be reviewed for accreditation purposes and receive accreditation periodically, as negotiated between the AA/SBDC and the accreditation committee of the recognized association.
( iii ) If an SBDC does not receive accreditation, the SBA may initiate the non-renewal or termination procedure pursuant to § 130.700.
( iv ) The statue at 15 U.S.C. 648(k)(3)(B) states the SBA may not renew or extend any cooperative agreement with a SBDC unless the center has been approved under the accreditation program conducted pursuant to this section, except that the AA/SBDC may waive such accreditation requirement, at their discretion, upon a showing that the center is making a good faith effort to obtain accreditation.
( 2 ) The AA/SBDC and/or designee will participate in the deliberations of the accreditation committee.
( d ) *Audits.* The examinations by the SBA will not serve as a substitute for audits required of Federal recipients under the Single Audit Act of 1984 (31 U.S.C. 7501) or applicable OMB guidelines (see 2 CFR part 200, subpart F) nor will such internal review substitute for investigations conducted by the SBA Office of Inspector General under the authority of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-452, 92 Stat. 1101) as amended (see § 130.830).
[88 FR 76650, Nov. 7, 2023]
###### Editorial Note on Part 124

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 124 appear at 72 FR 50040, Aug. 30, 2007, and 76 FR 8253, Feb. 11, 2011.

#### § 124.1 What is the purpose of the 8(a) Business Development program?

Sections 8(a) and 7(j) of the Small Business Act authorize a Minority Small Business and Capital Ownership Development program (designated the 8(a) Business Development or “8(a) BD” program for purposes of the regulations in this part). The purpose of the 8(a) BD program is to assist eligible small disadvantaged business concerns compete in the American economy through business development.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-126 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Thursday, August 28,

1997)

NRC ISSUES TWO POLICIES

ON AGREEMENT STATE PROGRAM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued two policy

statements governing its Agreement State program. One policy

describes the general roles and responsibilities of the NRC and

the Agreement States. The other provides guidance on how the NRC

determines adequacy and compatibility of Agreement State

programs.

Agreement States, now 30 in number, are states which have

entered into agreements with NRC to assume regulatory authority

over certain radioactive materials. They must establish programs

which NRC has found to be adequate to protect the public health

and safety as well as compatible with NRC's own requirements.

The policy describing NRC-Agreement State general roles and

responsibilities was published in draft form for comment in the

Federal Register in August 1994.

The policy-setting guidance on adequacy and compatibility

contains five elements deemed essential to a state's program to

ensure the adequate protection of public health and safety. They

are: implementing state legislation and regulations; licensing;

inspection and enforcement; staffing and personnel

qualifications; and response to events and allegations. States

will be periodically evaluated to assure that the combination of

these elements provides an equivalent or greater level of public

health and safety protection than NRC programs.

This policy also clarifies the definitions of key terms used

in agreement state reviews. "Adequacy" refers to an agreement

state's protection of public health and safety within its own

state. "Compatibility" refers to the possible effects of an

agreement state's actions on regulation of materials nationwide.

Under the new policy, states may design their own regulatory

program, so long as basic requirements for adequacy and

compatibility are met. In this way, the policy aims to achieve a

balance between a state's desire for flexibility in shaping
regulations to fit local conditions, while maintaining a coherent

and orderly regulatory pattern across the country.

A public workshop was held in November 1994 to discuss the

second policy. A joint NRC/Agreement State working group was

convened a year later to develop implementing procedures.

The new policy guidelines will be used during NRC's reviews

of Agreement States' programs to assess their adequacy and

compatibility. Such reviews take place about every four years.

The two new policies will be published shortly in the

Federal Register.

###
#### Joseph B. Greenhut et al. v. Realty Associates Securities Corporation.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
§ 131.520 Audits, examinations, and investigations. ( a ) *General audits.* The SBA may conduct WBC audits. ( 1 ) Audits of a recipient organization will be conducted pursuant to the Single Audit Act of 1984 (if applicable) and applicable Office of Management and Budget circulars.
( 2 ) The SBA's Office of Inspector General (OIG) or its agents may inspect, audit, investigate, or otherwise review the WBC as the Inspector General deems appropriate.
( b ) *Financial examinations.* The WBC will have periodic financial examinations conducted by either the SBA or an independent contracted firm. WBCs, in accordance with the program announcement and the cooperative agreement, must comply with all requirements set forth for such purposes. ( 1 ) Applicant organizations proposing to enter the WBC program for the first time shall be subject to a post-award examination or sufficiency review conducted by or coordinated with the SBA or its designee. As part of the financial examination, the financial examiner will verify the adequacy of the accounting system, the suitability of proposed costs, and the nature and sources of proposed matching funds.
( 2 ) Examinations by the SBA will not serve as a substitute for audits required of Federal recipients under the Single Audit Act of 1984, 31 U.S.C. Chapter 75 or applicable Office of Management and Budget guidelines (see 2 CFR part 200), nor will such internal reviews serve as a substitute for audits to be conducted by the SBA's Office of the Inspector General under authority of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended.
( c ) *Investigations.* The SBA may conduct investigations to determine whether any person or entity has engaged in acts or practices constituting a violation of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 656; any rule, order, or regulation; or any other applicable Federal law.
#### § 3933.60 Effective date.

An assignment or sublease takes effect, so far as the United States is concerned, on the first day of the month following the BLM's final approval, or if the assignee requests it in advance, the first day of the month of the approval.
p130378.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0378

Focus Ready Draft 4/22/2013

ENGINEER: Jon \ REC

PV (kg/yr): 10,200 Import Only

SUBMITTER: 

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: Wear chemcial safety gloves. // Wear full face

shield with goggles underneath. // Wear impervious

clothing: full rubber suit (rain gear), rubber or plastic

boots, slicker suit.

Respirator: Wear appropriate respirator when ventilation

is inadequate.

Health Effects: Inhalation: Hamful if inhaled and may

cause delayed lung injury. Can cause severe eye, skin,

and respiratory tract burns. Risk of serious damage to

lungs. May cause nose, throat, and lung irritation.

Inhalation of aerosol may cause irritation to the upper

respiratory tract. // Eyes: Corneal edema may give rise

to a perception of "blue haze" or "fog" around lights.

Exposed individuals may see rings around bright lights

(temporary effect). Product vapor can cause glaucopsia

(corneal edema) when absorbed into the tissue of the eye

from the atmosphere. Causes eye burns. May cause

blindness. // Skin: Casues skin burns. // Ingestion: If

ingested, severe burns of the mouth and throat, as well

as a danger of perforation of the esophagus and the

stomach.

TLV/PEL:

None established.

CRSS (04/15/2013):

Page 1
p130378.eng

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (04/16/2013):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox: Analog: .

Migration to groundwater: Anion moderate; Cation moderate

PBT rating: P2B1T2 Anion: P1B1T2; Cation: P2B1T2

Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 24.00 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

No Pollution Prevention information provided by the

submitter.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0378

Use: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 1

unknown site(s)

Days/yr: 300

 

Page 2
p130378.eng

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Water or Incineration or Landfill

High End: 6.2E+0 kg/site-day over 49 days/yr from 1 site

or 3.1E+2 kg/yr

 

Water or Incineration or Landfill

Conservative: 3.4E-1 kg/site-day over 300 days/yr from 1

site

or 1.0E+2 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL

4.1E+2 kg/yr - all sites

 

Page 3
#### May Giasi, Appellant, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Respondent.

Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Tayloi; and Lewis, JJ.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-97-83 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Tuesday, November 25, 1997)

NRC STAFF SETS PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE

TO DISCUSS SURRY NUCLEAR PLANT CONCERNS WITH VIRGINIA POWER

Meeting In Atlanta On December 4 Is Open To Public Observation

The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a predecisional

enforcement conference in Atlanta on December 4 to discuss with Virginia Power

Company officials regulatory concerns associated with fire protection equipment at the

Surry nuclear power plant near Surry, Virginia.

Company personnel identified the fact that the control room complex, and safety

related vital electrical shutdown panels located away from the control room, were not

fully protected so that, in the event of a fire, one train of systems necessary to achieve

and maintain a reactor shutdown from either the control room or remote emergency

control stations would be free of fire damage. NRC inspectors noted that the company

apparently failed to report these discrepancies to the NRC and failed to correct them in

a timely manner.

The inspection report described the general conduct of work at Surry during the

period of inspection as being characterized by safety-conscious operations, sound

engineering and maintenance practices and careful radiological work controls but

noted the apparent inadequate compliance with fire protection requirements.

The predecisional conference will be held at 10:30 a.m. at the NRC’s Atlanta

regional office, located on the 24th floor of the Atlanta Federal Center at 61 Forsyth

Street, S.W. The meeting is between the NRC and Virginia Power, but members of the

public are welcome to attend, and NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to

answer questions from interested observers.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that a

determination has been made that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action

will be taken. The purpose of the conference is to discuss apparent violations, their

causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point our any

errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable the
company to outline its proposed corrective actions. No decision on the apparent

violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a civil penalty, will be made

at the conference. Those decisions will be made later by senior NRC officials.

#

EDITORS: Recorded information on all upcoming NRC predecisional enforcement

conferences may be obtained by dialing 1-800-952-9674. A copy of the inspection report

upon which this predecisional conference is based is available by request at the above

mail, E-mail, telephone or fax address.
#### Jessie M. Wager v. Maurice Cohen.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 625 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the enrollment fee 

requirement for TRICARE Select for members of the Armed Forces 

who retired before January 1, 2018. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2021 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the 

enrollment fee requirement for TRICARE Select for 

members of the Armed Forces who retired before January 1, 2018. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TRICARE Select Res5 toration Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 625 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF ENROLLMENT FEE REQUIREMENT 

2 FOR TRICARE SELECT FOR CERTAIN RE3 TIRED MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 1075 of 

5 title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as fol6 lows: 

7 ‘‘(e) EXCEPTIONS TO CERTAIN COST-SHARING

8 AMOUNTS FOR CERTAIN RETIRED BENEFICIARIES.—(1) 

9 Notwithstanding subsection (d)— 

10 ‘‘(A) the annual enrollment fee for TRICARE 

11 Select for beneficiaries who are former members of 

12 the uniformed services who retired before January 1, 

13 2018, shall be $0; and 

14 ‘‘(B) subject to paragraph (2), the annual en15 rollment fee for TRICARE Select for beneficiaries 

16 described in subsection (c)(2)(B) in the retired cat17 egory who are not described in subparagraph (A) 

18 shall be $150 for an individual and $300 for a fam19 ily. 

20 ‘‘(2) The modified enrollment fee established under 

21 paragraph (1)(B) for beneficiaries described in subsection 

22 (c)(2)(B) in the retired category shall not apply with re23 spect to the following beneficiaries: 

24 ‘‘(A) Retired members and the family members 

25 of such members covered by paragraph (1) of section 

26 1086(c) of this title by reason of being retired under 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 625 IS

1 chapter 61 of this title or being a dependent of such 

2 a member. 

3 ‘‘(B) Survivors covered by paragraph (2) of 

4 such section 1086(c).’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 subsection (a) shall apply to annual enrollment fees under 

7 TRICARE Select under section 1075 of title 10, United 

8 States Code, for coverage under TRICARE Select after 

9 December 31, 2021. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,208
<SECURITIES>                                    13,224
<RECEIVABLES>                                       65
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,546
<PP&E>                                           6,570
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,748)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,766
<BONDS>                                            493
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           16,566
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        97,441
<OTHER-SE>                                   (102,310)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,085
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,136
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,193)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)
        

</TABLE>