alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-20 March 6, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC CHAIRMAN RICHARD A. MESERVE TO HOLD NEWS BRIEFING FOLLOWING

VISIT TO CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ON MARCH 10

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Richard A. Meserve will visit the Calvert Cliffs

nuclear power plant on Friday, March 10. Dr. Meserve will tour the site and meet with plant officials.

He will hold a press availability at the close of his plant visit.

The plant, located in Lusby, Md., is operated by Baltimore Gas and Electric Company.

The media briefing will begin at 4 p.m. in the plant’s Visitors Center, located off Highway 2

and 4, 10 miles south of Prince Frederick in Calvert County, Md.

Dr. Meserve was sworn in as Chairman of the NRC on October 29. A brief biography can be

found on the NRC’s web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRC/WHATIS/meserve.vitae.html

#
#### § 8365.2 Developed recreation sites and areas.

The rules governing conduct and use of a developed recreation site or area shall be posted at a conspicuous location near the entrance to the site or area.
[EXHIBIT 31.2]




           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Jack Chien, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of Med
Gen, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-
14) for the registrant and have:

a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
     including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
     by others within those entities, particularly during the
     period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
     controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
     the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation
     Date"); and

c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
     based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation
     of internal controls which could adversely affect the
     registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
     financial data and have identified for the registrants
     auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
     or other employees who have a significant role in the
     registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  January 20, 2006

By:  /s/Jack Chien
   ------------------------------------
   Jack Chien /Chief Financial Officer,
   and Principal Accounting Officer
#### Town of Windsor *v.*George R. Macri et al.

*George R. Maori,*pro se, and *Julia S. Maori,*pro se, in support of the petition.

*John A. Wall,*in opposition.

Decided April 29, 1986

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is denied.
----

**TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED**

**Chief Financial Officer Certification**

I, David Moffatt (Chief Financial Officer), certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Telstra Corporation Limited;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

Date:	   30   September 2002

Name: David MoffattTitle: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32(a)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, OF THE


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rocky Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mike Brooks, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Mike Brooks


Mike Brooks, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


April 29, 2011
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 48 (Thursday, March 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 12996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2015-04017]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0971; FRL-9923-72-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and 
Approval; Comment Request; National Volatile Organic Compound Emission 
Standards for Architectural Coatings (Renewal)

Correction

    In notice document 2015-04017 appearing on pages 10480-10481 in the 
issue of February 26, 2015 make the following correction:
    On page 10481, in the first column, under the DATES heading, in the 
second line, ``March 9, 2015'' should read ``March 30, 2015''.

[FR Doc. C1-2015-04017 Filed 3-11-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.1202 Commencement of appeals of final SBA loan review decisions. ( a ) An appeal petition must be filed with OHA within 30 calendar days after the appellant's receipt of the final SBA loan review decision. To file and manage an appeal of a final SBA loan review decision with OHA, refer to the OHA Case Portal at *https://appeals.sba.gov .* An appellant is required to use the OHA Case Portal to file and manage their appeal.
( b ) Appellant must provide their lender with a copy of the timely appeal petition upon filing in order for the lender to extend the deferment period of the PPP loan until a final decision is issued under § 134.1211.
( c ) ( 1 ) Do not count the day the time period begins, but do count the last day of the time period.
( 2 ) If the last day is Saturday, Sunday, or a Federal holiday, the time period ends on the next business day. *Example:* On a Thursday, a borrower receives a final SBA loan review decision. The time period begins on Thursday, so the first day to count is Friday. Because the 30th calendar day after receipt of the decision is a Saturday, the appeal deadline extends to the next business day, which is Monday.
( 3 ) ( i ) A Judge may modify any time period or deadline, except: ( A ) The time period governing commencement of a case (*i.e.,* when the appeal petition may be filed); and
( B ) A time period established by statute.
( ii ) A party may move for an extension of time pursuant to § 134.211.
( d ) A timely appeal by a PPP borrower of a final SBA loan review decision extends the deferment period of the PPP loan until a final decision is issued under § 134.1211.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0307

_________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

JOSHUA ARNOLD BACON,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

 and

EMILY ANN BACON,

 Respondent and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the 

transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Troy Kelley is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 25, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve the 

transcripts requested on appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the District Court and the court 

reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 28 2022

07/28/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0307
Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the 12 months ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Phillip W. Roe, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofthe Company, certify, for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

            (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                        of the Exchange Act; and

            (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Phillip W. Roe                                 Phillip W. RoeExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerSeptember 2, 2009
### §142j. John C. Stennis Center for Public Service Training and Development; disbursement of funds, computation and disbursement of basic pay, and provision of financial management services and support by Library of Congress; payment for services

From and after October 1, 1988, the Library of Congress is authorized to—

(1) disburse funds appropriated for the John C. Stennis Center for Public Service Training and Development;

(2) compute and disburse the basic pay for all personnel of the John C. Stennis Center for Public Service Training and Development;

(3) provide financial management services and support to the John C. Stennis Center for Public Service Training and Development, in the same manner as provided with respect to the Office of Technology Assessment under section 142f of this title; and

(4) collect from the funds appropriated for the John C. Stennis Center for Public Service Training and Development the full costs of providing the services specified in (1), (2), and (3) above, as provided under an agreement for services ordered under 31 U.S.C. 1535 and 1536.

(Pub. L. 101–163, title II, §205, Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1060.)
### §790. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–569, title V, §502(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4424

Section, Pub. L. 93–112, title V, §500, Sept. 26, 1973, 87 Stat. 390, related to effects on existing law, references in other provisions, availability of unexpended appropriations, savings provision, and extension of appropriations.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Commercial Bookbinding Company et al., Appellants, and White House, Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-061 April 26, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND ON APRIL 28

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has

scheduled a joint meeting of its subcommittees on plant operations and on reliability and probabilistic

risk assessment on April 28 in Rockville, Maryland.

The subcommittees will discuss staff and industry initiatives related to risk-informed technical

specifications.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s

Two White Flint North Building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, starting at 8:30 a.m.

Those who seek additional information on the meeting or schedule changes should contact

Michael Markley, at 301-415-6885.

Other aspects of the meeting are described in the April 5 edition of the Federal Register. ACRS

meeting notices, transcripts and letter reports are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

###
#### Louis Gluckstern, Respondent, v. Philip R. Gluckstern, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part. Settle order on notice.
###### Editorial Note on Part 126

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 126.502 Is there a limit to the length of time a concern may be a certified HUBZone small business concern?

There is no limit to the length of time a concern may remain designated as a certified HUBZone small business concern in DSBS (or successor system) so long as it continues to comply with the provisions of §§ 126.200, 126.500, and 126.501.

[84 FR 65246, Nov. 26, 2019]
### [§333. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–514, title VI, §631(e)(3), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2273]

Section, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 103; Feb. 26, 1964, Pub. L. 88–272, title II, §225(g), 78 Stat. 89; Oct. 4, 1976, Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §§1901(a)(44), 1906(b)(13)(A), 1951(b)(6)(A), 90 Stat. 1772, 1834, 1838, related to election as to recognition of gain in certain liquidations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to any distribution in complete liquidation, and any sale or exchange, made by a corporation after July 31, 1986, unless such corporation is completely liquidated before Jan. 1, 1987, any transaction described in section 338 of this title for which the acquisition date occurs after Dec. 31, 1986, and any distribution, not in complete liquidation, made after Dec. 31, 1986, with exceptions and special and transitional rules, see section 633 of Pub. L. 99–514, set out as an Effective Date note under section 336 of this title.
#### § 301.5 Matching share requirements.

The required Matching Share of a Project's eligible costs may consist of cash or In-Kind Contributions. In addition, the Eligible Applicant must provide documentation to EDA demonstrating that the Matching Share is committed to the Project, will be available as needed and is not or will not be conditioned or encumbered in any way that would preclude its use consistent with the requirements of the Investment Assistance. EDA shall determine at its sole discretion whether the Matching Share documentation adequately addresses the requirements of this section.

[82 FR 57053, Dec. 1, 2017]
460 P.2d 808

#### CENTRAL MINING COMPANY, Inc., a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Edith P. COZART, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

No. 8836.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Nov. 3, 1969.

*734Henry J. Hughes, Sante Fc, for appellant.

Paul “Pablo” Marshall, David Eldon Douglas, Socorro, for appellee.

OPINION

TACKETT, Justice.

This action was commenced in the District Court of Rio Arriba County, New Mexico, by complaint filed on May 17, 1956, to quiet title to certain mining claims. The case was tried to the court without a jury. Final judgment was entered on September 20, 1968, in favor of plaintiff for all of Tracts 2, 3, 6 and 7, and for an undivided one-half interest in Tracts 1, 4 and 5. Plaintiff appeals.

Supreme Court Rule 5(5) (§ 21-2-1(5) (5), N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp.), provided:

> "Appeals, as provided by law, shall be allowed upon written application to and the *order of the district court*in which the judgment is rendered.” (Emphasis added)

The above rule was amended effective March 15, 1961, to allow the filing of a notice of appeal, thereby dispensing with the court order as to all cases commenced after that date.

Under appellate practice prior to the 1961 amendment, timely entry of an order allowing an appeal was jurisdictional. Chavez v. Village of Cimarron, 65 N.M. 141, 333 P.2d 882 (1958); Scott v. Newsom, 74 N.M. 399, 394 P.2d 253 (1964).

The important and controlling date in this case is May 17, 1956. Appellant only filed a notice of appeal and did not obtain an order of the district court allowing the appeal, Because the rule in existence on the date of the filing of the complaint in the instant case was not complied with, this court has no jurisdiction in the matter. Scott v. Newsom, supra.

The appeal is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

MOISE and COMPTON, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John W. Smolak, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Hypercom Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
     have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
     being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date:  March 15, 2004                               By: /s/ John W. Smolak
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    John W. Smolak
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.2017 Accumulation. ( a ) Originating materials from the territory of a Party that are used in the production of a good in the territory of another Party will be considered to originate in the territory of that other Party.
( b ) A good that is produced in the territory of one or both of the Parties by one or more producers is an originating good if the good satisfies the requirements of § 10.2014 and all other applicable requirements of General Note 35, HTSUS.