alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-46 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, April 2, 1998)

NRC AND UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

AT THE FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff and representatives of the University of Michigan

will meet April 22, to discuss apparent violations of agency reporting requirements at the Ford

Nuclear Reactor at the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor.

Scheduled to begin at 1:00 p.m. in Room O1-F5 of One White Flint North, 11555

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, the predecisional enforcement conference will be open to

the public for observation.

Two apparent violations were identified during an inspection conducted by NRC staff

February 23-27. One was a failure by operators to perform an adequate review before

replacing a cooling pump. The other was the operators’ failure to submit the required report to

NRC when it was discovered that the technical specifications of the reactor’s license needed to

be amended after the pump replacement. The university uses the Ford reactor for teaching

programs, and for various research and irradiation services.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that the

NRC has determined a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather,

the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide

the licensee with an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this conference. That decision

will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

##
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                        NOVACARE EMPLOYEE SERVICES, INC.
                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


Do-All Services, Inc.
Employee Benefits Management, Inc.
Employers' Risk Management, Inc.
NCES ES, Inc.
NCES Finance, Inc.
NCES Holdings, Inc.
NCES Licensing, Inc.
NCES of New Mexico, Inc.
NovaCare Administrative Employee Services of New York, Inc.
NovaCare Administrative Employee Services, Inc.
NovaCare Employee Services Club Staff, Inc.
NovaCare Employee Services Easy Staff, Inc.
NovaCare Employee Services Northeast, Inc.
NovaCare Employee Services Resource One, Inc.
NovaCare Employee Services TPI, Inc.
NovaCare Employee Services West, Inc.
NovaCare Employee Services of America, Inc.
NovaCare Employee Services of Boston, Inc.
NovaCare Employee Services of New York, Inc.
NovaCare Employee Services of Orlando, Inc.
Paralign Staffing Technologies, Inc.
Pay America, Inc.
Professional Employer Systems, Inc.
Professional Insurance Planners of Florida, Inc.
Staff Leasing, Inc.
#### Pietro Tringali, Respondent, *v.*Jack B. Kaffee et al., Copartners Doing Business as Rojay Blouse & Sportswear Co., et al., Appellants.

First Department,

December 22, 1947.

*110*Bernard I. Kamen*of counsel *(Sol S. Ostertag*with him on the brief; *Kamen & Ostertag,*attorneys), for appellants.

*Bernhardt M. Meisels*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff seeks to recover overtime compensation, liquidated damages and reasonable attorney’s fees pursuant to the provisions of the Pair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 *et seq.).*Before an employee may recover under the overtime provisions of the act, he must establish, among other things, that during a given work week he actually devoted in excess of forty hours of compensable working time to the business of his employer. *(Walling*v. *Sun Pub. Co.,*47 F. Supp. 180, affd. *sub nom. Sun Pub. Co.*v. *Walling,*140 F. 2d 445, certiorari denied 322 U. S. 728; *Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. R. Co.*v. *Muscoda Local,*321 U. S. 590.)

The complaint in this case merely alleges that “ defendants employed the plaintiff for work weeks in excess of forty hours While plaintiff may have been engaged to work more than forty hours per week it does not follow that he actually did work in excess of forty hours during any work week. Unless he actually did so he would not be entitled to the overtime compensation or other benefits provided by the law. The order appealed from should therefore be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants and the motion to dismiss the complaint granted, with leave to the respondent to serve an amended complaint within ten days after service of a copy of the order to be entered herein, on payment of said costs.

Peck, P. J., Gleítnoe, Cohk, Vast Vooehis and Shleetag, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants and the motion to dismiss the complaint granted, with leave to the plaintiff-respondent to serve an amended complaint within ten days after service of the order with notice of entry, on payment of said costs.
### §1185h. Maintenance of price comparison tool

A group health plan or a health insurance issuer offering group health insurance coverage shall offer price comparison guidance by telephone and make available on the Internet website of the plan or issuer a price comparison tool that (to the extent practicable) allows an individual enrolled under such plan or coverage, with respect to such plan year, such geographic region, and participating providers with respect to such plan or coverage, to compare the amount of cost-sharing that the individual would be responsible for paying under such plan or coverage with respect to the furnishing of a specific item or service by any such provider.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §719, as added Pub. L. 116–260, div. BB, title I, §114(c)(1), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2874.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to plan years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2022, see section 114(d) of div. BB of Pub. L. 116–260, set out as a note under section 9819 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 638 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to include a payment and performance 

security requirement for certain infrastructure financing, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2021 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN (for himself and Mr. ROUNDS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to include a payment 

and performance security requirement for certain infrastructure financing, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting Infrastruc5 ture by Protecting Our Subcontractors and Taxpayers 

6 Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 638 IS

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TIFIA ELIGIBILITY 

2 AND PROJECT SELECTION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 602(c) of title 23, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(3) PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE SECU7 RITY.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall 

9 ensure that the design and construction of a 

10 project carried out with assistance under the 

11 TIFIA program shall have appropriate payment 

12 and performance security, regardless of whether 

13 the obligor is a State, local government, agency 

14 or instrumentality of a State or local govern15 ment, public authority, or private party. 

16 ‘‘(B) WRITTEN DETERMINATION.—If pay17 ment and performance security is required to be 

18 furnished by applicable statute or regulation, 

19 the Secretary may accept such payment and 

20 performance security requirements applicable to 

21 the obligor if the Secretary has made a written 

22 determination that the Federal interest with re23 spect to Federal funds and other project risk 

24 related to design and construction is adequately 

25 protected. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 638 IS

1 ‘‘(C) NO DETERMINATION OR APPLICABLE

2 REQUIREMENTS.—If a determination under this 

3 paragraph has not been made or there are no 

4 payment and performance security requirements 

5 applicable to the obligor, the security under sec6 tion 3131(b) of title 40 shall be required.’’. 

7 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by this 

8 Act shall apply with respect to any contract entered into 

9 on or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 124

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 124 appear at 72 FR 50040, Aug. 30, 2007, and 76 FR 8253, Feb. 11, 2011.

#### § 124.401 Which SBA field office services a Participant?

The SBA district office which serves the geographical territory where a Participant's principal place of business is located normally will service the concern during its participation in the 8(a) BD program.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00283-CV

Freddie Lee Walker, Appellant

v.

Brad Livingston et al., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-07-000556, HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Freddie Lee Walker appeals from the trial court’s order granting appellees’

motion to transfer venue from Travis to Brazoria County. But this Court is without jurisdiction to

consider an interlocutory appeal of an order transferring venue. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code

Ann. §§ 15.064(a) (West 2002) (“The court shall determine venue questions from the pleadings and

affidavits. No interlocutory appeal shall lie from the determination.”), 51.014 (West Supp. 2006);

Tex. R. Civ. P. 87(6) (regarding trial court’s venue determination, “[t]here shall be no interlocutory

appeal from such determination.”); see also American Home Prods. Corp. v. Clark, 38 S.W.3d 92,

96 (Tex. 2000) (“Neither the court of appeals nor this Court can review the propriety of the trial

court’s venue decision.”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
2

 

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: July 18, 2007
### §140. Employees; fitness

All persons employed in and about said Library of Congress under the Librarian shall be appointed solely with reference to their fitness for their particular duties.

(Feb. 19, 1897, ch. 265, §1, 29 Stat. 545; June 29, 1922, ch. 251, §1, 42 Stat. 715.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Act June 29, 1922, §1, cited as a credit to this section, which transferred duties of the Superintendent of the Library Building and Grounds to the Architect of the Capitol and the Librarian of Congress and provided for appointment of employees, was amended generally by Pub. L. 108–7, div. H, title I, §1208(a), Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 375, and no longer relates to this subject matter.
#### § 4.1375 Time for initial decision.

The administrative law judge shall issue an initial decision within 30 days of the date the record of the hearing is closed, or, if no hearing is held, within 30 days of the deadline for filing responses under § 4.1372(b).
#### Berger Manufacturing Company v. Moses Reis, Impleaded, etc.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Exhibit 11

                      CITIZENS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                        
                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                        
                  For the Periods Ended June 30, 1997 and 1996
                      (in millions, except per share data)
                                        
                                    (Unaudited)            (Unaudited)
                                   Quarter Ended        Six Months Ended
                                      June 30,              June 30,
                                 ----------------       ----------------
                                   1997      1996         1997      1996
                                 ----------------       ----------------
Primary:                                                                
                                                                        
  Average shares outstanding       35.3      35.6         35.3      35.7
                                                                        
  Net effect of dilutive                                                
   stock options based on the            
   treasury stock method using
   average market price               -         -            -         -
                                 ----------------       ----------------
                       TOTALS      35.3      35.6         35.3      35.7
                                 ================       ================
  Net income available to        
   shareholders                  $ 16.6    $ 12.1       $ 45.0    $ 34.6
                                 ================       ================  
                                                                      
  Per share amount               $ 0.47    $ 0.34       $ 1.27    $ 0.97
                                                                        
                                                                        
                                                                        
Fully diluted:                                                          
                                                                        
  Average shares outstanding       35.3      35.6         35.3      35.7
                                                                        
  Net effect of dilutive                                                
   stock options based on the           
   treasury stock method using
   average market price               -         -            -         -
                                 ----------------       ----------------
                       TOTALS      35.3      35.6         35.3      35.7
                                 ================       ================ 
  Net income available to        
   shareholders                  $ 16.6    $ 12.1       $ 45.0    $ 34.6
                                 ================       ================ 
                                                                       
  Per share amount               $ 0.47    $ 0.34       $ 1.27    $ 0.97
### §362. Other provisions and rules not affected

Except as expressly provided in this chapter, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to affect any other provision of this title, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, or the Federal Rules of Evidence.

(Added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, §11042(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1854.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and the Federal Rules of Evidence, referred to in text, are set out in the Appendix to this title.

The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, referred to in text, are set out in the Appendix to Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
Exhibit 13.2

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED

Certification

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, C.C. Wei, President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                   
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 13, 2015 |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                   
|                     |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ C.C. Wei                                                      
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Name:  C.C. Wei
Title:    President and Co-Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 6.1 Purpose and scope of part.

This part sets forth policies and procedures concerning the collection, use and dissemination of records maintained by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) which are subject to the provision of 5 U.S.C. 552a, popularly known as the “Privacy Act of 1974” (hereinafter referred to as the Act). These policies and procedures govern only those records as defined in § 6.2. Policies and procedures governing the disclosure and availability of records in general are in part 5 of this chapter. This part also covers: (a) Procedures for notification to individuals of a FEMA system of records pertaining to them; (b) guidance to individuals in obtaining information, including inspections of, and disagreement with, the content of records; (c) accounting of disclosure; (d) special requirements for medical records; and (e) fees.
### §4. Duties of Commissioner in general

It shall be the duty of the Commissioner of Labor Statistics to ascertain the effect of the customs laws, and the effect thereon of the state of the currency, in the United States, on the agricultural industry, especially as to its effect on mortgage indebtedness of farmers. He shall also establish a system of reports by which, at intervals of not less than two years, he can report the general condition, so far as production is concerned, of the leading industries of the country. He is also specially charged to investigate the causes of, and facts relating to, all controversies and disputes between employers and employees as they may occur, and which may tend to interfere with the welfare of the people of the different States. He shall also obtain such information upon the various subjects committed to him as he may deem desirable from different foreign nations, and what, if any, convict-made goods are imported into this country, and if so from whence.

(June 13, 1888, ch. 389, §7, 25 Stat. 183; Aug. 23, 1912, ch. 350, §1, 37 Stat. 407; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §3, 37 Stat. 737; May 29, 1928, ch. 901, §1(110), (111), 45 Stat. 994.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from act June 13, 1888. Act June 13, 1888, also contained other provisions relating to duties of former Commissioner of Labor to ascertain cost of producing, in leading countries, articles dutiable in United States, comparative cost of living, etc., which have been omitted from this section because of act Aug. 23, 1912, transferring those duties to Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce.

Act Aug. 23, 1912, transferred the duty of former Commissioner of Labor to ascertain the cost of producing, in leading countries, articles dutiable in the United States, the profits of the manufacturers and producers of such articles, the comparative cost of such articles, comparative cost of living in such countries, what articles are controlled by trusts and the effect they have on prices and production, to the Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce. Text of said act is set out as section 172 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.

Act Mar. 4, 1913, authorized the substitution of "Commissioner of Labor Statistics" for "Commissioner of Labor".

#### Amendments

1928—Act May 29, 1928, repealed provisions requiring reports to Congress on investigations required by this section, and is authority for omission of "and report as to" after "ascertain" in first sentence and "and report thereon to Congress" at end of third sentence relating to information from foreign nations, and convict made goods.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of Labor, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Labor, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 6 of 1950, §§1, 2, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### SUBCHAPTER III—CAPITOL VISITOR CENTER REVOLVING FUND
§ 333.10 Authority. ( a ) The priorities and allocations authorities of the President under Title I of the Act that have been delegated to the Secretary of Homeland Security have been redelegated to the Administrator. These rules are issued pursuant to Title I of the Act, and implementing authorities, including such authorities as are contained in subchapter III of chapter 55 of title 50, United States Code (50 U.S.C. 4554, 4555, 4556, and 4560), which have been delegated to FEMA.
( b ) *Delegations by FEMA.* FEMA may authorize Delegate Agencies to assign priority ratings to orders under these regulations as authorized.
( c ) *Jurisdictional limitations.* Unless delegated by the President to DHS or FEMA, the provisions of this part are not applicable to the following resource categories, as defined in Executive Order 13603, a successor executive order, or implementing regulations issued thereunder: ( 1 ) Food resources, food resource facilities, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer (Resource department with jurisdiction—Department of Agriculture);
( 2 ) Energy supplies (Resources agency with jurisdiction—Department of Energy);
( 3 ) All forms of civil transportation (Resource department with jurisdiction—Department of Transportation);
( 4 ) Health resources (Resource department with jurisdiction—Department of Health and Human Services), except that pursuant to Executive Order 13911, the provisions of this part are applicable to health and medical resources needed to respond to the spread of COVID-19;
( 5 ) Water resources (Resource department with jurisdiction—Department of Defense); and
( 6 ) All other materials, services, and facilities, including construction materials (“industrial resources”) (Resource department with jurisdiction—Department of Commerce).
#### Carol MARDEUSZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-16662.

D.C. No. CV-00-002407-PJH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, RYMER and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, we deny Mardeusz’s request for oral argument.

MEMORANDUM **

Carol Mardeusz appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in her action for injunctive relief under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12102. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review entry of summary judgment de novo, *Playboy Enter. v. Welles,*279 F.3d 796, 800 (9th Cir.2002), and we dismiss the appeal as moot.

The relief sought by Mardeusz, an injunction forcing the state court to implement her proposed ADA accommodations during her criminal trial, became moot once her criminal trial ended. *See Bernhardt v. County of Los Angeles,*279 F.3d 862, 871 (9th Cir.2002) (“Where the activities sought to be enjoined already have occurred, and the appellate courts cannot undo what has already been done, the action is moot, and must be dismissed.”).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.