alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 123.202 How much can my business borrow with a physical disaster business loan? ( a ) Disaster business loans, including both physical disaster and economic injury loans to the same borrower, together with its affiliates, cannot exceed the lesser of the uncompensated physical loss and economic injury or $2 million. Physical disaster loans may include amounts to meet current building code requirements. If your business is a major source of employment, SBA may waive the $2 million limitation. A major source of employment is a business concern that has one or more locations in the disaster area, on or after the date of the disaster, which: ( 1 ) Employed 10 percent or more of the entire work force within the commuting area of a geographically identifiable community (no larger than a county), provided that the commuting area does not extend more than 50 miles from such community; or
( 2 ) Employed 5 percent of the work force in an industry within the disaster area and, if the concern is a non-manufacturing concern, employed no less than 50 employees in the disaster area, or if the concern is a manufacturing concern, employed no less than 150 employees in the disaster area; or
( 3 ) Employed no less than 250 employees within the disaster area.
( b ) SBA will consider waiving the $2 million loan limit for a major source of employment only if: ( 1 ) Your damaged location or locations are out of business or in imminent danger of going out of business as a result of the disaster, and a loan in excess of $2 million is necessary to reopen or keep open the damaged locations in order to avoid substantial unemployment in the disaster area; and
( 2 ) You have used all reasonably available funds from your business, its affiliates and its principal owners (20% or greater ownership interest) and all available credit elsewhere (as described in § 123.104) to alleviate your physical damage and economic injury.
( c ) Physical disaster business borrowers may request refinancing of liens on both damaged real property and machinery and equipment. Such amount shall be reduced to the extent such lien or encumbrance is satisfied by insurance or otherwise. Your business property must be totally destroyed or substantially damaged, which means: ( 1 ) 40 percent or more of the aggregate value (lesser of market value or replacement cost at the time of the disaster) of the damaged real property (including land) and damaged machinery and equipment; or
( 2 ) 50 percent or more of the aggregate value (lesser of market value or replacement cost at the time of the disaster) of the damaged real property (excluding land) and damaged machinery and equipment.
( d ) The SBA Administrator may increase the $2 million loan limit for disaster business physical and economic injury loans under an individual disaster declaration based on appropriate economic indicators for the region(s) in which the disaster occurred. SBA will publish the increased loan amount in the Federal Register.
[61 FR 3304, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 63 FR 46644, Sept. 2, 1998; 75 FR 14332, Mar. 25, 2010; 88 FR 39341, June 16, 2023]
§ 64.5 Relationship of rates to zone designations. ( a ) In order to expedite a community's qualification for flood insurance under the emergency program, the Administrator may authorize the sale of such insurance without designating any Zones A, M, or E within a community, provided the community has previously adopted flood plain management regulations meeting the requirements of § 60.3(a), § 60.4(a) or § 60.5(a) of this subchapter. When the Administrator has obtained sufficient technical information to delineate Zones A, M, or E, he/she shall delineate the tentative boundaries on a FHBM.
( b ) Upon the effective date of the FIRM, flood insurance will continue to be available throughout the entire community at chargeable rates (i.e., subsidized) for first layer coverage of existing structures, but will be only available at risk premium rates for all new construction and substantial improvements. Upon the effective date of a FIRM, second layer coverage is available only at risk premium rates for all structures.
( c ) Detailed insurance information may be obtained from the servicing companies. See part 62 of this subchapter.
[41 FR 46986, Oct. 26, 1976. Redesignated at 44 FR 31177, May 31, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 44552, Sept. 29, 1983; 49 FR 4751, Feb. 8, 1984]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,246
<SECURITIES>                                    10,827
<RECEIVABLES>                                       14
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,435
<PP&E>                                           6,813
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,216)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,672
<BONDS>                                            359
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     16,664
<COMMON>                                       106,667
<OTHER-SE>                                   (112,209)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,681
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,886
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (64)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,583)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.55)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 295.35 Access to records.

For purpose of audit and investigation, a Claimant will grant the FEMA DHS Office of the Inspector General and the Comptroller General of the United States access to any property that is the subject of a claim and to any and all books, documents, papers, and records maintained by a Claimant or under the Claimant's control pertaining or relevant to the claim.
§ 6.33 Denials of access. ( a ) A system manager may deny an individual access to that individual's record only upon the grounds that FEMA has published the rules in the Federal Register exempting the pertinent system of records from the access requirement. These exempt systems of records are described in subpart G of this part.
( b ) Upon receipt of a request for access to a record which the system manager believes is contained within an exempt system of records he or she shall forward the request to the appropriate official listed below or to his or her delegate through normal supervisory channels. ( 1 ) Deputy Administrators.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( 3 ) Federal Insurance Administrator.
( 4 ) Assistant Administrators.
( 5 ) United States Fire Administrator.
( 6 ) Chief of Staff.
( 7 ) Office Directors.
( 8 ) Chief Counsel.
( 9 ) [Reserved]
( 10 ) Chief Financial Officer.
( 11 ) Regional Administrators.
( c ) In the event that the system manager serves in one of the positions listed in paragraph (b) of this section, he or she shall retain the responsibility for denying or granting the request.
( d ) The appropriate official listed in paragraph (b) of this section shall, in consultation with the Office of Chief Counsel and such other officials as deemed appropriate, determine if the request record is contained within an exempt system of records and: ( 1 ) If the record is not contained within an exempt system of records, the above official shall notify the system manager to grant the request in accordance with § 6.32, or
( 2 ) If the record is contained within an exempt system said official shall; ( i ) Notify the requestor that the request is denied, including a statement justifying the denial and advising the requestor of a right to judicial review of that decision as provided in § 6.57, or
( ii ) Notify the system manager to make record available to the requestor in accordance with § 6.31, notwithstanding the record's inclusion within an exempt system.
( e ) The appropriate official listed in paragraph (b) of this section shall provide the Privacy Appeals Office with a copy of any denial of a requested access.
[44 FR 50293, Aug. 27, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 44543, Sept. 29, 1983; 50 FR 40006, Oct. 1, 1985; 51 FR 34604, Sept. 30, 1986; 74 FR 15334, Apr. 3, 2009]
###### Editorial Note on Part 121

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 121 appear at 72 FR 50039 and 50040, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 121.1102 Are NAICS code designations subject to appeal?

A NAICS code designation made by a procuring activity contracting officer may be appealed to OHA. The procedures governing OHA appeals are set forth in part 134 of this chapter. The OHA appeal is an administrative remedy that must be exhausted before judicial review of a NAICS code designation may be sought in a court.

[67 FR 47245, July 18, 2002]
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-129 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-052 March 27, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, ON APRIL 5-7

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

(ACRS) has scheduled a meeting on April 5 - 7 in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss, among other items,

last year’s partial loss of power at Indian Point Unit 2 in New York.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s

Two White Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, starting at 8:30 a.m. each day.

On the opening day of the meeting, the committee will discuss a proposed final report of a

technical study on spent fuel pool accident risk for decommissioning plants, a proposed white paper on

the development of risk-based performance indicators and a revised version of the human performance

program.

On April 6, the day’s agenda will include review of special studies for risk-based analysis of the

reactor operating experience, an NRC team’s findings and recommendations regarding the reactor

shutdown and partial loss of AC power at Indian Point Unit 2 in New York last August, and the reports

of the materials and metallurgy, and thermal-hydraulic phenomena ACRS subcommittees.

The following day’s schedule will feature the continuation of proposed ACRS reports and

miscellaneous activities.

Those who seek additional information or schedule updates about this meeting should contact

Sam Duraiswamy, at 301-415-7364.

Other aspects of the meeting are described in an upcoming Federal Register notice. ACRS

meeting notices, transcripts and letters are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW .

###
#### § 68.8 Scope of review.

Review at administrative hearings shall be limited to: An examination of any information presented by each appellant within the 90 day appeal period indicating that elevations proposed by the Federal Insurance Administrator are scientifically or technically incorrect; the FIRM; the flood insurance study; its backup data and the references used in development of the flood insurance study; and responses by FEMA to the issues raised by the appellant(s).

[47 FR 23449, May 29, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 33879, Aug. 27, 1984]
§ 80.21 Closeout requirements. Upon closeout of the grant, the subrecipient, through the recipient, must provide FEMA, with the following: ( a ) A copy of the deed recorded for each property, demonstrating that each property approved in the original application was mitigated and that the deed restrictions recorded are consistent with the FEMA model deed restriction language to meet the requirements of this part;
( b ) A photo of each property site after project completion;
( c ) The latitude-longitude coordinates of each property site;
( d ) Identification of each property as a repetitive loss structure, if applicable; and
( e ) Other information as determined by the Administrator.
[73 FR 61743, Oct. 31, 2007, as amended at 86 FR 50672, Sept. 10, 2021]
### §2920. Transferred

Section, Pub. L. 101–649, title VIII, §801, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 5087, which related to educational assistance and training, was transferred to section 3293 of this title.
#### § 9260.0-7 Penalties.

Any person violating any provision of part 9260 of this title shall be subject to the specific penalties as noted under this part.
§ 204.64 Reporting and audit requirements ( a ) *Reporting.* Within 90-days of the Performance Period expiration date, the State will submit a final Financial Status Report, which reports all costs incurred within the incident period and all administrative costs incurred within the performance period; and
( b ) *Audit.* ( 1 ) Audits will be performed, for both the recipient and the subrecipients, under 2 CFR 200.500-200.520.
( 2 ) FEMA may elect to conduct a program-specific Federal audit on the Fire Management Assistance Grant or a subgrant.
[66 FR 57347, Nov. 14, 2001, as amended at 79 FR 63546, Oct. 24, 2014; 79 FR 76085, Dec. 19, 2014; 82 FR 42, Jan. 3, 2017]
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

61 Forsyth Street, S. W.

Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

e-mail kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-97-57 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark (404) 562-4416 (Monday, July

21, 1997)

Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE

WITH FP&L ON JULY 24 IN ATLANTA TO DISCUSS ST. LUCIE CONCERNS

Meeting Is Open To Public Observation

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a

predecisional enforcement conference with Florida Power & Light

Company officials in Atlanta on Thursday, July 24 to discuss

apparent violations regarding deficiencies related to construction

of the Unit 2 emergency core cooling system sump at the St. Lucie

nuclear power plant near Ft. Pierce, Florida.

The conference will begin at 10:00 a.m. in Suite 24T20 of the

NRC Region II office, located on the 24th floor of the Atlanta

Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street.

An NRC inspection at St. Lucie, completed on June 27,

identified three apparent violations regarding Unit 2 emergency

core cooling system sump enclosure screens. These screens are

designed to prevent debris from entering and clogging the system

during a postulated loss of cooling water accident.

The inspection indicated that the sump appears not to have

been built according to design drawings; that the condition was not

identified by the company despite several opportunities to do so,

and that the plant's updated Final Safety Analysis Report may have

been incorrect with respect to this system.

NRC officials said the decision to hold the conference does

not mean that a determination has been made that a violation has

occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. The purpose of

the meeting is to discuss the apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance, and to provide the company with an opportunity

to point out a errors in NRC inspection reports and to outline

proposed corrective actions. No decisions on possible NRC

enforcement action will be made at the conference.

The meeting is between officials of the NRC and FP&L and is

open to observation by the public. NRC officials will be available

at its conclusion to answer questions from interested observers.

#
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-208 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, May 10, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on

Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a technical meeting

December 3-5 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in

conference room T-2B3 of the NRC’s Two White Flint North Building

at 11545 Rockville Pike.

Here is the complete meeting schedule:

THURSDAY, DECEMBER 3

8:30 - 8:45 a.m. -- Opening remarks by the ACRS Chairman;

8:45 - 10:30 a.m. -- NEI whole plant study and options to make 10

CFR part 50 risk-informed;

10:45 - 12:15 p.m. -- Proposed options to make 10 CFR 50.59 riskinformed;

1:15 - 4:15 p.m. -- Integrated review of assessment processes and

improvements to the senior management meeting process;

4:30 - 7:00 p.m. -- Preparation of ACRS reports.

FRIDAY, DECEMBER 4

8:30 - 8:35 a.m. -- Opening remarks by the ACRS Chairman;

8:35 - 9:00 a.m. -- Plant license renewal subcommittee report;

9:00 - 9:45 a.m. -- Report of the planning and procedures

subcommittee;
9:45 - 10:30 a.m. -- Future ACRS activities;

10:45 - 11:00 a.m. -- Reconciliation of ACRS comments and

recommendations;

11:00 - 11:30 a.m. -- Election of officers for calendar year

1999;

1:15 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. -- Potential items for meeting with the NRC

Commissioners;

2:30 - 7:00 p.m. -- Preparation of ACRS reports.

SATURDAY, DECEMBER 5

8:30 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. -- Preparation of ACRS reports;

2:00 - 2:30 p.m. -- Miscellaneous

Although meetings of the ACRS are open, they are not part of

the agency’s public hearing process. The ACRS, an advisory group

to the Commission, conducts independent, highly technical reviews

of safety considerations related to nuclear facilities. While

anyone may attend, the committee will consider only oral or

written statements arranged in advance and limited to specific

matters set forth in a Notice of Meeting published in an upcoming

edition of the Federal Register.

The meeting may include closed sessions, if required, to

discuss proprietary or personnel information.

###
### [§2103. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–352, §5(c), June 27, 1988, 102 Stat. 663]

Section, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 962; Sept. 19, 1962, Pub. L. 87–669, §1, 76 Stat. 556, provided that appeal from State court or from a United States court of appeals improvidently taken be regarded as petition for writ of certiorari.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective ninety days after June 27, 1988, except that such repeal not to apply to cases pending in Supreme Court on such effective date or affect right to review or manner of reviewing judgment or decree of court which was entered into before such effective date, see section 7 of Pub. L. 100–352, set out as a note under section 1254 of this title.
- Inspector General Semiannual Report to Congress, April 1, 2017 - September 30, 2017
Memorandum
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Purpose and Requirements of the Office of Inspector General Semiannual Report
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-051 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, March 26,

1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on

the Medical Uses of Isotopes has scheduled a technical meeting

April 10 and 11 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will begin at 8:30

a.m. April 10, and 8:00 a.m. on April 11, in Room 2B3 of the

NRC's Two White Flint North building at 11545 Rockville Pike.

Topics to be discussed will include the Commission's Staff

Requirements Memo on "Materials/Medical Oversight;" the NRC's

Medical Policy Statement of 1979; criteria and racking of medical

procedures by risk; regulatory use of industry standards;

misadministrations; the advisory committee process; and status

reports on proposed rulemaking and guidance documents.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, are described in a Notice of Meeting published in

the March 26 edition of the Federal Register.

#
#### James J. Abrams, Respondent, v. Rubel Corporation, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
## Subtitle F—Procedure and Administration

Chapter
Sec. 1
61.
Information and returns
6001

62.
Time and place for paying tax
6151
63.
Assessment
6201
64.
Collection
6301
65.
Abatements, credits, and refunds
6401
66.
Limitations
6501
67.
Interest
6601
68.
Additions to the tax, additional amounts, and assessable penalties
6651
69.
General provisions relating to stamps
6801
70.
Jeopardy, receiverships, etc.
6851
71.
Transferees and fiduciaries
6901
72.
Licensing and registration
7001
73.
Bonds
7101
74.
Closing agreements and compromises
7121
75.
Crimes, other offenses, and forfeitures
7201
76.
Judicial proceedings
7401
77.
Miscellaneous provisions
7501
78.
Discovery of liability and enforcement of title
7601
79.
Definitions
7701
80.
General Rules
7801

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–589, §6(g)(3)(E), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3410, substituted "Jeopardy, receiverships, etc." for "Jeopardy, bankruptcy and receiverships" in item for chapter 70.

1  Section numbers editorially supplied.
§ 323.1 Purpose. This part: ( a ) States the policy of the Federal Government on use of resources in the period immediately following a nuclear attack on the United States;
( b ) Provides general guidance for Federal, State, and local government officials on activities to be accorded priority in the use of postattack resources; and
( c ) Lists those items essential to national survival in the immediate postattack period.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 1000 1500 2000 1000 18 12 06 00 06/21 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
#### § 206.43 Emergency support teams.

The Federal Coordinating Officer may activate emergency support teams, composed of Federal program and support personnel, to be deployed into an area affected by a major disaster or emergency. These emergency support teams assist the FCO in carrying out his/her responsibilities under the Stafford Act and these regulations. Any Federal agency can be directed to detail personnel within the agency's administrative jurisdiction to temporary duty with the FCO. Each detail shall be without loss of seniority, pay, or other employee status.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00411

- CR

DAMIAN RAMIREZ CAVAZOS

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No

. 6 of Hidalgo County , Texas

Trial Cause No. CR

- 08

- 4212

- F

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consider ed this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. February 6, 2014.