alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ORLANDO DIVISION

IN RE: PROCEDURES FOR Case No. 6:20-mc-5-Orl-LRH

DISCOVERY MOTIONS

STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS

In an effort “to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination” of any action in 

which this Order is filed, Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED as follows:

(1) If a discovery dispute arises, the parties must confer in person or via telephone in 

a good faith effort to resolve the dispute before seeking court intervention. See Local Rule 3.01(g). 

(2) If the parties are unable to resolve the discovery dispute, a party may seek court 

intervention, but must do so by filing a Short-Form Discovery Motion in compliance with this 

Order. Neither the Motion nor any response thereto shall exceed 500 words, exclusive of 

caption, signature block, and certifications.

(3) The Movant must attach to the Motion the discovery request and discovery 

response (if applicable) but need not otherwise comply with Local Rule 3.04(a).

(4) If time-sensitive, the Motion must be filed and captioned as “expedited.”

(5) Any party opposing the Motion shall file a response no later than five days 

after the Motion is filed (see Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)); a failure to file a timely response will result 

in the Motion being deemed unopposed. 

(6) To resolve the dispute, the Court may: decide the dispute on the basis of the Motion 

and any response, set a hearing, or order further briefing.

(7) In the Motion or response, a party may request additional briefing, but such a 

request must accompany, and not replace, the substantive argument.

(8) The parties must continue to confer concerning the dispute and must promptly 

notify the Court if they resolve the Motion in whole or in part.

(9) If a hearing is set, the parties shall file a joint notice two days before the 

hearing certifying ongoing conferral and stating which issues, if any, have been resolved.

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2020 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

The Court expects all parties to act courteously and professionally in the resolution of their 

discovery disputes. The Court may impose appropriate sanctions upon a finding of failure to 

comply with this Order or upon a finding of other discovery misconduct.

DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on January 6, 2020.

 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2020 Page 2 of 2
### SUBCHAPTER VI—STATE HUMAN RESOURCE INVESTMENT COUNCIL
### §§122b to 122g. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(67), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1740

Section 122b, based on H. Res. No. 687, §1, Ninety-fifth Congress, Sept. 20, 1977, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §111, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 777, related to leasing of office space in home districts of House Members.

Section 122c, based on H. Res. No. 687, §2, Ninety-fifth Congress, Sept. 20, 1977, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §111, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 777, related to determination of annual amount which could be disbursed on behalf of each Member under former sections 122b to 122g of this title.

Section 122d, based on H. Res. No. 687, §3, Ninety-fifth Congress, Sept. 20, 1977, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §111, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 777, related to authorization by Committee on House Administration of disbursements under former sections 122b to 122g of this title.

Section 122e, based on H. Res. No. 687, §4, Ninety-fifth Congress, Sept. 20, 1977, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §111, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 777, related to furnishing office equipment, carpeting, and draperies.

Section 122f, based on H. Res. No. 687, §5, Ninety-fifth Congress, Sept. 20, 1977, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §111, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 777, authorized Committee on House Administration to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out former sections 122b to 122g of this title.

Section 122g, based on H. Res. No. 687, §7, Ninety-fifth Congress, Sept. 20, 1977, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §111, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 777, defined terms for purposes of former sections 122b to 122g of this title.
#### § 123.7 Are there restrictions on how disaster loans can be used?

You must use disaster loans to restore or replace your primary home (including a mobile home used as a primary residence) and your personal or business property as nearly as possible to their condition before the disaster occurred, and within certain limits, to protect damaged or destroyed real property from possible future disasters.

[61 FR 3304, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 88 FR 39340, June 16, 2023]
### §829a. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–300, title I, §184(a)(2), Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1358

Section, Pub. L. 95–524, §5(b), Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 2019, related to development of methods to ascertain energy development and conservation employment impact data, and the presentation of best available data to the Secretary of Energy, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and committees of Congress.
### §1862b. Transfer of amounts appropriated for Architect of the Capitol under House Office Buildings

(a) During fiscal year 2019 and each succeeding fiscal year, amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for the Architect of the Capitol under the heading "House Office Buildings" may be transferred to the House of Representatives and merged with and made available under the heading "Allowances and Expenses", subject to the approval of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

(b) The period of availability of any amounts transferred to the House of Representatives under this section shall be the same period of availability applicable to such amounts as appropriated for the Architect of the Capitol.

(c) The aggregate amount transferred under this section in any fiscal year may not exceed $30,000,000.

(Pub. L. 116–6, div. H, title II, §204, Feb. 15, 2019, 133 Stat. 476.)
- 1 - Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

September 14, 2010

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc. for an exemption under 49 U.S.C. § 40109 (Memphis-Mexico City)

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0230

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, Delta urges that the application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Brian Hedberg, DOT Linda Lundell, DOT
info@airlineinfo.com
No: IV-24-004 January 22, 2024 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128 

NRC to Hold a Regulatory Conference with International Isotopes 

on Jan. 30 to Discuss Two Proposed Violations

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a regulatory conference on Jan. 30 with 

officials from International Isotopes of Idaho Falls, Idaho, to discuss the safety significance of two 

proposed violations. 

The proposed violations, identified in a December 2023 inspection report, involve 

importing, receiving and transferring radioactive material without appropriate authorization in NRC 

licenses. The company uses radioactive materials in the manufacture of devices for medical and 

industrial applications.

The meeting will be held at the NRC’s Region IV office at 1600 East Lamar Blvd., 

Arlington, Texas, beginning at 8 a.m. Central time. The meeting notice has information detailing

how the public can participate in the meeting by phone or online. 

Members of the public will have an opportunity to ask questions of the NRC staff or make 

comments about the issues discussed following the business portion of the meeting; however, the 

NRC staff is not soliciting comments pertaining to regulatory decisions. 

During the enforcement conference, company representatives will have the opportunity to 

provide their perspective or additional information, including any actions planned or completed to 

prevent recurrence of the issues, before the agency makes its final enforcement decision. 

No decisions on the final safety significance or any potential NRC actions regarding the 

proposed violations will be made at the meeting.
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417

No: II-97-42 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark (404) 562-4416 (Friday, June 6, 1997)

Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417

NRC SCHEDULES DESIGN INSPECTION EXIT MEETING AT ROBINSON PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public exit

meeting at Carolina Power & Light’s Robinson nuclear power plant to

discuss the results of a special NRC design inspection at the plant. That

meeting will be Thursday, June 12 at 1:30 p.m. in the Information Center

at the plant.

The design inspection began in mid-April and concluded May 23. The

inspection was led by Ed Kleeh from the NRC’s headquarters office in

Rockville, Maryland and included other inspectors working under contract

to the NRC. Similar inspections have been and will be performed over the

next two years at other plants.

The design inspections focus on reviews of the plants' original

design and configuration, and conformance with the licensees' safety

analysis report. Each inspection team is made up of engineers from NRC

and design specialists from either Stone & Webster or Sargent & Lundy,

architect/engineering firms with which NRC has contracted.

The NRC planned these inspections after recent findings that

licensees at the Millstone plant in Connecticut and at other facilities

routinely performed full-core offloads during refueling outages without

performing the necessary safety evaluation. It also was discovered that

other facilities' actual as-built configuration or operations were

inconsistent with the design basis information described in their

licenses. Special care is taken to avoid having inspections performed by

representatives of the architectural/engineering firm which originally

designed a power plant.

During the Robinson inspection, no issues were identified that would

raise an immediate operability question. A written report on the

inspection is expected in July.

###
#### § 118.2 Establishment of a CES.

When a port director makes a preliminary determination that a new CES should be established, or when the term of an existing CES is about to expire and the port director believes that the need for a CES still exists, he will announce, by written notice posted at the customhouse and by any other written methods he may consider appropriate (such as normal port information distribution channels, trade bulletins or local newspapers), that applications to operate a CES are being accepted. This notice will include the general criteria together with any local criteria that applicants must meet (see § 118.11 of this part), and will invite the public to submit any relevant written comments on whether a new CES should be established or on whether there is still a need for a CES. Applications will be accepted only in response to the port notice and must be received within 60 calendar days from the date of the notice. Public comments must be received within 30 calendar days from the date of the notice.
### §626. Compensation of the Director and Deputy Director

The compensation of the Director of the Federal Judicial Center shall be the same as that of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, and his appointment and salary shall not be subject to the provisions of title 5, United States Code, governing appointments in competitive service, or the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title, relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates: Provided, however, That any Director who is a justice or judge of the United States in active or retired status shall serve without additional compensation. The compensation of the Deputy Director of the Federal Judicial Center shall be the same as that of the Deputy Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts.

(Added Pub. L. 90–219, title I, §101, Dec. 20, 1967, 81 Stat. 666; amended Pub. L. 100–702, title III, §304(b)(1), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4648.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The General Schedule, referred to in text, is set out under section 5332 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–702 inserted "and Deputy Director" in section catchline and inserted at end of text "The compensation of the Deputy Director of the Federal Judicial Center shall be the same as that of the Deputy Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Pub. L. 100–702, title III, §304(c), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4648, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (b) [amending this section] shall be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 1988."
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-78 July 6, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

DUKE ENGINEERING & SERVICES TO BRIEF NRC STAFF ON REGION I WORK

Representatives of Duke Engineering & Services will

brief Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I staff on Thursday,

July 9, regarding work the firm is performing in the region. NRC

Region I encompasses the Northeastern United States.

The meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. in the Executive

Conference Room at the Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa.

It will be open to the public for observation.

Last year, Duke Engineering & Services acquired the

Nuclear Services Division of the Bolton, Mass.-based Yankee

Atomic Electric Company. As a result of that deal, Duke provides

engineering services to a number of nuclear power plants

previously served by Yankee Atomic’s Nuclear Services Division,

including the Vermont Yankee facility in Vernon, Vt., and the

permanently shutdown Yankee Rowe facility in Rowe, Mass.

Duke Engineering & Services is a subsidiary of Duke

Energy Corp., a global energy company headquartered in Charlotte,

N.C.

#
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-22995-WILLIAMS

SILVA HARAPETI,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CBS TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., et al., 

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis’s 

Report and Recommendation (“the Report”) (DE 106) on Plaintiff Silva Harapeti’s (“Plaintiff”) 

Renewed Motion to Extend Discovery and Dispositive Motion Deadlines (“Motion”). (DE 97.) The 

Report recommends that the Court denies Plaintiff’s Motion. No objections to the Report have 

been filed. Upon an independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable case law, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. The conclusions in the Report (DE 106) are AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Discovery and Dispositive Motion Deadlines (DE 97) is 

DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida on this 6th day of December, 2021.

Case 1:20-cv-22995-KMW Document 126 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2021 Page 1 of 1
No: II-23-007 April 6, 2023 

Contact: Dave Gasperson 404-997-4417 

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss

Safety Performance of BWXT Nuclear Fuel Facility

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for April 11 to discuss 

its two-year safety performance review of the BWXT Nuclear Operations Group Inc. nuclear fuel 

facility in Lynchburg, Virginia. 

The event is scheduled to run from 5-6:30 p.m., at the Concord Volunteer Fire Department, 

12573 Richmond Hwy in Concord, Virginia. NRC employees responsible for inspecting the BWXT 

fuel facility will be available at the open house to answer questions and provide additional 

information. 

The open house format allows more interaction with the NRC staff and facilitates one-onone and small group discussions. It also gives flexibility to nearby residents and others who wish to 

attend. Posters covering the agency’s inspections and the review of the facility’s operations will be 

available.

The NRC assessed performance at the BWXT facility from Jan. 1, 2021, through Dec. 31, 

2022, in safety operations, safeguards, radiological controls, facility support, and other areas. 

Overall, the NRC staff review found that BWXT continued to conduct its activities safely and met 

NRC requirements for protecting workers, nearby residents and the environment. 

The NRC plans to conduct the core inspection program for nuclear fuel facilities of this type 

during the current review period, which ends Dec. 31, 2024. 

A copy of the NRC letter to the company about the performance is available on the NRC 

website.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-54 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, March 16, 1999)

NRC SEEKS COMMENT ON PERFORMANCE-BASED

REGULATORY OVERSIGHT REPORT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking comment on a report, published by the

Office of Research, which describes a process for “performance-based” regulation of nuclear

power plants.

Performance-based oversight uses objective data to monitor several key areas

important to safety. These areas include, among others, certain initiating events which could

lead to more serious problems; the integrity of barriers to contain radioactivity; and emergency

preparedness.

This type of regulation also seeks to focus on the most important safety issues, and less

on prescriptive regulations, which are sometimes subjective. The goal is to increase the

efficiency and effectiveness of the plant oversight process.

The newly issued report is entitled “Elements of an Approach to Performance-Based

Regulatory Oversight, (NUREG/CR-5392).” Its purpose is to promote a better understanding of

how such a regulatory approach would work. It builds on a proposal advanced NRC some time

ago by the Nuclear Energy Institute, an industry group, and uses actual examples of plant

problems.

Those who wish to comment on the report may do so within 60 days. The report is

located on an NRC-sponsored website, at http://techconf.llnl.gov. The website is an electronic

technical conference and provides specific instructions on how to participate. Printed copies

may be ordered by telephoning the Government Printing Office at 202/512-1800. Comments

are requested on developing criteria for identifying candidate regulatory activities which could

be made more performance-based, including those that may not be amenable to risk

assessments.

NRC will use comments received on the report in its ongoing program to structure a

more results-oriented regulatory program based on both plant performance and risk

assessment factors.

###
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

101 Marietta St., Suite 2900, Atlanta, GA 30323

Tel. 404-331-5503 or 7878

No.: II-96-70 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Wednesday, August 21, 1996)

Roger Hannah 404-331-7878

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have announced the assignment of

Mel Shannon as the agency's Senior Resident Inspector at the Sequoyah nuclear power plant,

located near Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee. He succeeds Bill Holland, the Senior Resident Inspector

at the Sequoyah plant since 1991.

Shannon served in the U.S. Navy and held several positions with nuclear utilities before

joining the NRC in 1986. From 1986 to 1988, Shannon was a reactor inspector in the Region II

office in Atlanta and was a resident inspector at the Shearon Harris nuclear plant in North

Carolina from 1988 to 1993. Most recently, Shannon was an operations engineer in the NRC’s

Washington headquarters. He received a Bachelor's degree from New Hampshire College.

Shannon officially became the Senior Resident Inspector at the Sequoyah plant on August

18, joining NRC Resident Inspectors Doug Starkey and Deborah Seymour. The NRC inspectors

at the Sequoyah plant can be reached at 423-842-8001.

###
#### Long Island Tinsmith Supply Corporation, Appellant, v. Michael Janicki, Respondent.

No opinion. Present— Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell,,,Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-09 May 2, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC TO DISCUSS

NEW REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROGRAM FOR WATERFORD 3

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting Tuesday, May 9 in

Hahnville, Louisiana, to discuss the revised reactor oversight program for Waterford 3, a nuclear

power plant near Taft, Louisiana, operated by Entergy Operations, Inc.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. in the St. Charles Parish Courthouse Council Chambers,

15045 River Road, Hahnville. Anyone who would like to learn more about the new oversight process

or ask questions of NRC officials is invited to attend.

The new program was implemented nationwide in early April after a six-month pilot test

conducted at 13 nuclear power plants at nine sites from May to November 1999. It uses more

objective, timely, and safety-significant criteria in assessing performance, while seeking to more

effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. It also takes into account improvements in the

performance of the nuclear industry over the past twenty years.

Under the new program, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based

personnel are supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators.

These performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant performance, including the

viability of redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection, and security.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s internet website every three months, along with semi-annual updates to each plant's inspection

plans. Current performance information for Waterford can be found at

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WAT3/wat3_chart.html .

A plain language summary of the new inspection and assessment program is available from the

NRC Office of Public Affairs or on the website at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm .

###