# Appendix F.1 Point Source Emissions Inventory Documentation

## Point Source Documentation i The Hickory And Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC PM2.5 Appendix F.1 North Carolina Attainment Demonstration August 21, 2009 

# (This page intentionally left blank)

## Point Source Documentation ii The Hickory And Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC PM2.5 Appendix F.1 North Carolina Attainment Demonstration August 21, 2009 

# TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... ....... 1

2. 2002 POINT SOURCE INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT ........................................................ 1 2.1 Development of 2002 Actual Point Source Inventory .................................................... 2 2.1.1 Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule .................................................................... 2 2.1.2 Initial Data Evaluation ................................................................................................ 3 2.1.3 PM Augmentation ....................................................................................................... 4 2.1.4 EGU Analysis ............................................................................................................ . 7 2.1.5 Emission Inventory QA Review ................................................................................. 8 2.1.6 Summary of the 2002 Actual Inventory...................................................................... 9 2.2 Development of Typical Year EGU Inventory ............................................................... 9
3. 2009 POINT SOURCE EMISSIONS INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT ................................ 11 3.1 EGU Emission Projections ........................................................................................... 11 3.1.1 Chronology of the Development of EGU Projections .............................................. 12 3.1.2 VISTAS/MRPO IPM runs for EGU sources ............................................................ 14 3.1.3 Post-Processing of IPM Parsed Files ........................................................................ 15 3.1.4 Eliminating Double Counting of EGU Units ............................................................ 17 3.1.5 Quality Assurance steps ............................................................................................ 18 3.1.6 S/L Adjustments to IPM Modeling Results .............................................................. 19 3.1.7 Summary of 2009 EGU Poin t Source Inventory ...................................................... 20 3.2 Non-EGU Emission Projections ................................................................................... 24 3.2.1 Growth assumptions for non-EGU sources .............................................................. 25 3.2.2 Control Programs applied to non-EGU sources........................................................ 26 3.2.3 Quality Assurance steps ............................................................................................ 28 3.2.4 Summary of 2009 non-EGU Point Source Inventory ............................................... 29

LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1.3-1. Comparison of North Carolina PM Emissions: CERR versus the 2002 VISTAS Point Source Inventory ........................................................................................................ ... 6

Table 2.1.6-1 2002 Actual Point Source Inventory for North Carolina ......................................... 9

Table 2.2-1 NO x 

# Emissions Comparison for EGUs ..................................................................... 10

Table 3.1.6-1 NCDAQ Adjustments to IPM Re sults for the 2009 EGU Inventory. ................... 20

## Point Source Documentation iii The Hickory And Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC PM2.5 Appendix F.1 North Carolina Attainment Demonstration August 21, 2009 

# Table 3.1.7-1 EGU Point Source SO 2 

# Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009 ....................... 21

Table 3.1.7-2 EGU Point Source NOx Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009. ..................... 21

Table 3.1.7-3 EGU Point Source VOC Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009. .................... 22

Table 3.1.7-4 EGU Point Source PM 10 

# -PRI Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009 ............. 22

Table 3.1.7-5 EGU Point Source PM 2.5 

# -PRI Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009 ............ 23

Table 3.1.7-6 EGU Point Source NH 3 

# Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009 ...................... 23

Table 3.2.2-1 Non-EGU Point Source Control Programs Included in 2009 Inventory. .............. 26

Table 3.2.4-1 Non-EGU Point Source SO 2 

# Emission Comparison for 2009 and 2009 ............... 30

Table 3.2.4-2 Non-EGU Point Source NO x 

# Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009 .............. 30

Table 3.2.4-3 Non-EGU Point Source VOC Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009 ............. 31

Table 3.2.4-4 Non-EGU Point Source PM 10 

# -PRI Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009 ..... 31

Table 3.2.4-5 Non-EGU Point Source PM25- PRI Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009 .... 32

Table 3.2.4-6 Non-EGU Point Source NH 3 

# Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009 ............... 32

# 1. INTRODUCTION

The attainment modeling for Hickory and Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, North Carolina PM2.5 non-attainment areas was performed in conjunction with the regional haze modeling being done by the Southeast Regional Pl anning Organization, Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (V ISTAS) and the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone modeling being done by th e Association of Southeastern Integrated Planning (ASIP). VISTAS and ASIP are run by the ten southeast states (Alabama, Florid a, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia a nd West Virginia). Since the regional haze and PM2.5 modeling uses annual simu lations and includes an intermediate year that is the attainment year required for Hickory and Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point areas, the North Carolina Division of Air Quality (NCDAQ) decided to use the this modeling for its attainment demonstration.

VISTAS/ASIP developed emission estimates for all pollutants of concern for regional haze, fine particulate matter and ozone. The emissions invent ory discussions relevant to PM2.5 formation will be discussed in this document.



# 2. 2002 POINT SOURCE INVE NTORY DEVELOPMENT

This section details the development of the 2002 base year inventory for point sources. There were two major components to the development of the point source sector of the inventory. The first component was the incorporation of data s ubmitted by State and Local (S/L) agencies to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U SEPA) as part of the Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR) requirements. Work on incorporating the CERR data into the revised base year involved: 1) obtaini ng the data from the USEPA or th e S/L agencies, 2) evaluating the emissions and pollutants reported in the CERR submittals, 3) augmenting CERR data with annual emission estimates for primary coarse particulate matter (PM 10 

# -PRI) and PM 2.5 

# -PRI; 4) evaluating the emissions from electric gene rating units, 5) completing quality assurance reviews for each component of the point source inventory, and 6) updating the database with corrections or new information from S/L agencies based on their review of the 2002 inventory. The processes used to perform the emission inve ntory development are described in the first portion of this section.

The second component was the development of a “typical” year inventory for electric generating units (EGUs). The VISTAS/ASIP states determ ined that a typical year EGU inventory was necessary to smooth out any anomalies in emissions from the EGU sector due to meteorology,

# economic, and outage factors in 2002. This is consistent with the USEPA’s guidance for SIP modeling. The typical year EGU inventory is intended to repr esent the five-year (2000-2004) period that will be used for the attainment de monstration for the PM2.5 and ozone SIPs, and to determine the regional haze reasonable progress goals . The second part of this section discusses the development of the typi cal year EGU inventory.

A list of sources located in Hickory and Greensb oro-Winston Salem-High Point areas, as well as the annual emissions can be found in Appendix E.

2.1 Development of 2002 Actual Point Source Inventory

VISTAS/ASIP contracted with MACTEC to develop the 2002 emission inventory. NCDAQ submitted the most updated statewide emission invent ory to the contractor with the exception of the emissions from the three local programs. For the three local programs, Forsyth, Mecklenburg, and Buncombe Counties, the CERR submittal from the USEPA was used. Once all of the files were obtained, MACTEC ran th e files through the USEPA’s National Emissions Inventory (NEI) Input Format (NIF ) Basic Format and Content checking tool to ensure that the files were submitted in standard NIF format and that there were no referential integrity issues with those files.

The primary task in preparing the 2002 base year inventory was the incorp oration of corrections and new information as submitted by the S/L agencies based on their review of the previous draft versions of the inventory. The following s ubsections document the data sources for the inventory, the checks made on the CERR submittals, the evaluation of EGU emissions, and other quality assurance/quality cont rol (QA/QC) checks. The final subsection summarizes the 2002 NOx and VOC inventory by s ector (EGU and non-EGU).

Throughout the development of the point source emissions inventory, the NCDAQ completed detailed reviews of the inventories prepared by the VISTAS/ASIP contractor and provided comments and data corrections when needed.

2.1.1 Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule The CERR was published in the Federal Regi ster on Monday, June 10, 2002 (FR Volume 67, Number 111, pp 39602 - 39616). This brief summary is provided as a quick introduction to the CERR and covers the major items in the rule.

# The purpose of the CERR is to simplify reporting, offer options for data collection and exchange, and unify reporting dates for various categories of criteria pollutant emission inventories. The rule applies to S/L agencies. Previous reporting requirements ha ve, at times, forced reporting agencies into inefficient collecting and reporting activities. This rule consolidates the emission inventory reporting requirements found in va rious parts of the Clean Air Act (CAA). Consolidation of reporting requirements will enable S/L agencies to better explain to program managers and the public the necessity for a consistent inventory program, increases the efficiency of the emission i nventory program, and provide more consistent and uniform data.

States are required to prepare a comprehensive st atewide inventory every th ree years. The first inventory was for the year 2002 and was due J une 1, 2004. This CERR inventory was used for the VISTAS/ASIP 2002 base year.

2.1.2 Initial Data Evaluation

MACTEC conducted an initial review of the 2002 point source CERR data. The following evaluations were completed to identify potenti al data quality issues associated with the CERR data:

• 

# Compared the number of sites in the CERR su bmittal to the number of sites in the VISTAS draft 2002 inventory; the number of sites in the CERR submittal was less than in the VISTAS draft 2002 inventory, since th e CERR data was limited to major sources, while the VISTAS draft 2002 inventory containe d data for both major and minor sources; verified with S/L contacts that minor s ources not included in the CERR point source inventory were included in th e CERR area source inventory.

• 

# Checked for correct pollutant codes and corrected to make them NIF-compliant.

• 

# Checked for types of particulate matter (PM) codes reported (i.e., PM-FIL, PM-CON, PM-PRI, PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, PM25-FIL); corrected codes with obvious errors (i.e., changed PMPRI to PM-PRI). The PM augmentation process for filling in missing PM pollutants is disc ussed later in Section 2.1.3.

• 

# Converted all emission values that were not in tons to tons to a llow for preparation of emission summaries using consistent units.

• 

# Checked start and end dates in the NIF file s to confirm consistency with the 2002 base
year.

## • 

# Compared annual and daily emissions when daily emissions were reported; in some cases, the daily value was non-zer o (but very small) but the annual value was zero. This was generally the result of rounding in an S/L agency’s submittal.

• 

# Compared ammonia (NH 3 

# ) emissions as reported in the CERR submittals and the 2002 Toxics Release Inventory; worked with S/L agencies to resolve any outstanding discrepancies.

• 

# Compared sulfur dioxide (SO 2 

# ) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions for EGUs to the USEPA’s Clean Air Markets Division (CAM D) continuous emission monitoring (CEM) database to identify any outstanding discre pancies. A full discussion of the EGU emissions analysis is disc ussed later in Section 2.1.4.

• 

# Prepared State-level emission summaries by pollutant for both the EGU and non-EGU sectors to allow S/L agencies to compar e emissions as repo rted in the 1999 NEI Version 2, the VISTAS draft 2002 i nventory, and the CERR submittals.

• 

# Prepared facility-level emissi on summaries by pollutant to al low S/L agencies to review facility level emissions for reasonableness and accuracy.

MACTEC communicated the results of these analyses through email/telephone exchanges with the S/L point source contacts as well as through Excel summary spreadsheets. The VISTAS S/L agencies submitted corrections a nd updates as necessary to resolve any QA/QC issues from these checks.

2.1.3 PM Augmentation Particulate matter emissions can be reporte d in many different forms, as follows:

PM Category Description

PM-PRI Primary PM (include s filterable and condensable)

PM-CON Primary PM, condensable por tion only (all less than 1 micron)

PM-FIL Primary PM, filterable portion only

PM 10 

# -PRI Primary PM 10 

# (includes filterable and condensable)

# PM 10 

# -FIL Primary PM 10 

# , filterable portion only

PM 2.5 

# -PRI Primary PM 2.5 

# (includes filterable and condensable)

PM 2.5 

# -FIL Primary PM 2.5 

# , filterable portion only

North Carolina reports PM-PRI, PM 10 

# -PRI

, 

# and PM 2.5 

# –PRI in the CERR. From any one of these pollutants, the USEPA has developed augmen tation procedures to estimate PM10-PRI, PM 10 

# -FIL, PM 2.5 

# -PRI, PM 2.5 

# -FIL, and PM-CON. If not in cluded in a S/L inventory, PM 10 

# -PRI and PM 2.5 

# -PRI were calculated by adding PM 10 

# -FIL and PM-CON or PM 2.5 

# -FIL and PM-CON, respectively.

The procedures for augmenting point source PM emissions are documented in detail in the USEPA’s document Documentation for the Final 1999 Natio nal Emissions Inventory {Version 3} for Criteria Air Pollutants and Ammonia – Point Sources , January 31, 2004. (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/ 1999inventory.html). Briefl y, the PM data augmentation procedure includes the following five steps:

• 

# Step 1: Prepare S/L/Tribal PM and PM 10 

# Emissions for Input to the PM Calculator

• 

# Step 2: Develop and Apply Sour ce-Specific Conversion Factors

• 

# Step 3: Prepare Factor s from PM Calculator

• 

# Step 4: Develop and Apply Algorithms to Esti mate Emissions from S/L/Tribal Inventory Data

• 

# Step 5: Review Results and Update the NEI with Emission Estimates and Control Information.

Please refer to the USEPA documentation for a co mplete description of the PM augmentation procedures.

Table 2.1.3-1 compares the original PM emission estimates from the North Carolina CERR submittals and the revised 2002 VISTAS emissi ons estimates calculated using the above methodology. This table is intended to show that MACTEC took whatever State/Local provided in the way of PM and filled in gaps to add in PM-CON where emissions were missing in order to calculate PM 10 

# -PRI and PM 2.5 

# -PRI for all processes to get a complete set of particulate data.

# MACTEC did not compare any other pollutants besides PM, since for other pollutants CERR emissions equal VISTAS emissions

Table 2.1.3-1. Comparison of North Carolin a PM Emissions: CERR versus the 2002 VISTAS Point Source Inventory
Database PM-PRI PM-FIL PM-CON PM10-PRI PM10-FIL PM2.5-PRI PM2.5-FIL

CERR 48,110 0 0 36,222 0 24,159 0

VISTAS 48,114 41,407 6,708 36,992 30,284 27,512 21,113

Note 1: CERR refers to data as submitted by S/L agencies; VISTAS refers to data calculated by MACTEC using the PM augmentation methodologies described in this document.

Note 2: The emission values in the VISTAS emission rows above differ slightly from the final values in the inventory. This is due to several corrections and updates to the 2002 inventory submitted by S/L agencies after the PM augmentation was performed as discussed in Section 2.1.3.



# After the PM augmentation process was perfor med, MACTEC executed a series of checks to identify potential inconsistencies in th e PM inventory. These checks included:

• PM-PRI less than PM 10 

# -PRI, PM 2.5 

# -PRI, PM 10 

# -FIL, PM 2.5 

# -FIL, or PM-CON;

• PM-FIL less than PM 10 

# -FIL or PM 2.5 

# -FIL;

• PM 10 

# -PRI less than PM 2.5 

# -PRI, PM 10 

# -FIL, PM 2.5 

# -FIL or PM-CON;

• PM 10 

# -FIL less than PM 2.5 

# -FIL;

• PM25-PRI less than PM 2.5 

# -FIL or PM-CON;

• The sum of PM 10 

# -FIL and PM-CON not equal to PM 10 

# -PRI; and

• The sum of PM 2.5 

# -FIL and PM-CON not equal to PM 2.5 

# -PRI.

MACTEC asked S/L agencies to review this information and provide corrections where the inconsistencies were significant.

Note that for the inventory, only the PM 10 

# -PRI and PM 2.5 

# -PRI emission estimates were retained since they are the only two PM sp ecies that are included in the air quality modeling. Other PM species were removed from the inventory to facilitate emissions modeling.

# 2.1.4 EGU Analysis MACTEC made a comparison of the annual sulfur dioxide (SO2) and NO x 

# emissions for EGUs as reported in the S/L agencies CERR submittals and the data from the USEPA’s Clean Air Markets Division (CAMD) continuous emission monitoring (CEM) database to identify any outstanding discrepancies. Faci lities report hourly CEM data to the USEPA for units that are subject to CEM reporting requirements of the NOx SIP Call rule and Title IV of the CAA. The USEPA sums the hourly CEM emissions to the annual level, and MACTEC compared these annual CEM emissions to those in the S/L inve ntories. The 2002 CEM inventory containing NOx and SO2 emissions and heat input data we re downloaded from the USEPA CAMD web site ( www.epa.gov/airmarkets ). The data were provided by quarter and emission unit.

The first step in the EGU analysis involved prep aring a crosswalk file to match facilities and units in the CAMD inventory to facilities and units in the S/L invent ories. In the CAMD inventory, the Office of Regulat ory Information Systems (ORIS) identification (ID) code identifies unique facilities and the unit ID identifies unique boilers and internal combustion engines (i.e., turbines and reci procating engines). In the North Carolina point source emissions inventories, the State and county code (FIPS code) and State facili ty ID together identify unique facilities and the emission unit ID identifies unique boilers or inte rnal combustion engines. In most cases, there is a one-to- one correspondence between the CA MD identifiers and the S/L identifiers. However, in some of the S/L inve ntories, the emissions for multiple emission units are summed and reported under one emission unit ID. MACTEC created an Excel spreadsheet that contained an initial crosswalk with the OR IS ID and unit ID in the CEM inventory matched to the State and county FIPS, State facility ID, and emission unit ID in the emissions inventories. The initial crosswalk contained both the annual emissions summed from the CAMD database, as well as, the S/L emission estimate. The matching at the facility level was nearly complete. In some cases, however, S/L agencies or stakeholders’ assistance was needed to match some of the CEM units to emission units in the S/L inventories.

The second step in the EGU analysis was to pr epare an Excel spreadsheet that compared the annual emissions from the hourly CAMD inventor y to the annual emissions reported in the S/L inventory. The facility-level comparison of CEM to emission inventory NOx and SO2 emissions found that for most facilities, the annual emissi ons from the S/L inventory equaled the CAMD CEM emissions. Minor differences could be explai ned because the facility in the S/L inventory contained additional small or emergency units th at were not included in the CAMD database.

The final step in the EGU analysis was to compare the SO2 and NOx emissions for select Southern Company units in the VISTAS/ASIP region. Southern Company is a super-regional

# company that owns EGUs in four VISTAS/ASI P States – Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and Mississippi – and participates in VISTAS as an industry stakeholder. Southern Company independently provided emissi on estimates for 2002 as part of the development of the preliminary VISTAS 2002 inventory. Emission estimates were reviewed by the States and incorporated into the States CERR submittal. There were no major inconsistencies between the Southern Company data, the CAMD data, and the S/L CERR data.

The minor inconsistencies found included small differences in emission estimates (<2 percent difference), exclusion/inclusion of small gas-fired units in the different databases, and grouping of emission units in S/L CERR submittals wher e CAMD listed each unit individually. MACTEC compared SO 2 

# and NO x 

# emissions on a unit-by-unit basis and did not find any major inconsistencies.

2.1.5 Emission Inventory QA Review Throughout the inventory developm ent process, QA steps were pe rformed to ensure that no double counting of emissions occurred, and to en sure that a full and complete inventory was developed for VISTAS. QA was an important co mponent to the inventory development process and MACTEC performed the following QA steps on the point source compone nt of the VISTAS revised 2002 base year inventory:

1. Facility level emission summaries were pr epared and evaluated to ensure that emissions were consistent and th at there were no missing sources.

2. State-level EGU and non-E GU comparisons (by pollutant ) were developed between the 2002 base year inventory, the draft VISTAS 2002 inventory, and the 1999 NEI Version 2 inventory.

3. Data product summaries and raw NIF 3.0 data files were provided to the VISTAS Emission Inventory Technical Advisor and to the Point Source, EGU, and non-EGU Special Interest Work Group representative s for review and comment. Changes based on these comments were reviewed and approve d by the S/L point source contact prior to implementing the changes in the files.

Version numbering was used for all inventory files developed. The version numbering process used a decimal system to track major and minor changes.

# 2.1.6 Summary of the 2002 Actual Inventory

Tables 2.1.6-1 summarize the final 2002 actual ba se year inventory for North Carolina. All values are in tons per year. The EGU emissions include the emissions from all processes with a Source Classification Code (SCC) of either 1-01 -xxx-xx (External Combustion Boilers – Electric Generation) or 2-01-xxx-xx (Inte rnal Combustion Engines – Elect ric Generation). Emissions for all other SCCs are included in the non-EGU column.

Table 2.1.6-1 2002 Actual Point Source Inventory for North Carolina

State All Point Sources EGUs Non-EGUs

SO2 522,113 477,990 44,123

NOx 196,782 151,854 44,928

VOC 62,170 988 61,182

CO 64,461 13,885 50,576

PM 10 

# -PRI 36,592 22,754 13,838

PM 2.5 

# -PRI 26,998 16,498 10,500

NH 3 

# 1,234 54 1,180

2.2 Development of Typical Year EGU Inventory
VISTAS/ASIP developed a typical year 2002 emi ssion inventory for EGUs to avoid anomalies in emissions due to variability in meteor ology, economic, and outage factors in 2002. The typical year inventory re presents the five year (2000-2004) period, which are the years used to calculate the average design value.

Data from the USEPA’s CAMD were used to develop normalization factors for producing a 2002 typical year inventory for EGUs. The VIST AS/ASIP contractor used the ratio of the 2000-2004 average heat input and the 2002 actual heat input to normalize the 2002 actual emissions. MACTEC obtained data from the US EPA CAMD for utilities regulated by the Acid Rain program. Annual data for the period 2000 to 2004 were obtained from the CAMD web site. The parameters available were the SO2 and NOx emission rates, heat i nput, and operating hours.

# MACTEC used the actual 2002 heat input and the average heat i nput for the 5-year period from 2000-2004 as the normalization factor, as follows:

Normalization Factor: 2000-2004 aver age heat input 2002 actual heat input

If the unit did not operate for all five years, then the 2000-2004 average he at input was calculated for the one or two years in which the unit did operate. The annual actual emissions were multiplied by the normalization factor to determine the typical emissions for 2002, as follows:

Typical Emissions = 2002 actual emissions x Normalization Factor

After applying the normalization factor, some adjustments were needed for special circumstances. For example, a unit may not have operated in 2002 and thus have zero emissions. If the unit had been permanently retired prior to 2002, then MACTEC used zero emissions for the typical year. If the unit ha d not been permanently retired and would normally operate in a typical year, then MACTEC used the 2001 (or 2000) heat input and emission rate to calculate the typical year emissions.

The final step was to replace the 2002 actual emi ssions with the 2002 typical year data described above. MACTEC provided the raw data and resu lts of the typical ye ar calculations in a spreadsheet for S/L agency to review and commen t. Any comments made were incorporated into the typical 2002 inventory.

Table 2.2-1 summarizes emissions by State and pollutant for the actual 2002 EGU inventory and the typical year EGU inventory. For the entire VISTAS region, actual 2002 NOx emissions were about 0.1 percent lower than the typical year emissions. North Carolina’s actual 2002 NOx emissions were 2.0 percent higher th an the typical year emissions.

Table 2.2-1 2002 NO x 

# Emissions Comparison for EGUs
NO x 

## Emissions (tons/year)

State Actual 2002 Typical 2002 Percentage Difference

AL 161,038 154,704 3.9

FL 257,677 282,507 -9.6

GA 147,517 148,126 -0.4

## KY 198,817 201,928 -1.6

MS 43,135 40,433 6.3

NC 151,854 148,812 2.0

SC 88,241 88,528 -0.3

TN 157,307 152,137 3.3

VA 86,886 85,081 2.1

WV 230,977 222,437 3.7



# 3. 2009 POINT SOURCE EMISSION S INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT

Different approaches were used for different sectors of the point s ource inventory. For the EGUs, VISTAS/ASIP relied primarily on the Integrated Planning Model ® 

# (IPM) to project future generation, as well as, to calculate the impact of future emission control programs. The IPM results were adjusted based on S/L agency knowle dge of planned emission controls at specific EGUs. For non-EGUs, VISTAS/ASIP used recently updated growth and cont rol data consistent with the data used in the USEPA’s Clean Air In terstate Rule (CAIR) analyses, and supplemented these data with available S/L agency input a nd updated fuel use forecast data for the United States Department of Energy.

For both sectors, VISTAS/ASIP ge nerated 2009 inventory with cont rol scenarios that account for post-2002 emission reductions from promulgated a nd proposed federal, St ate, local, and sitespecific control programs as of July 1, 2004. S ection 3.1 discusses the E GU projection inventory development, while Section 3.2 discusses the non-EGU projection inve ntory development.

3.1 EGU Emission Projections
The following subsections discuss the aspects of the development of the EGU projections.

• A chronology of the EGU development pr ocess used by MACTEC and discuss key decisions in selecting the final methods for performing the emissions projections.

• The development of the final set of IPM r uns that are included in the VISTAS/ASIP 2009 inventory.

• The process of transforming the IPM parsed files into NIF format.

# • The process for ensuring that units accounted for in IPM were not double-counted in the non-EGU inventory.

• The QA/QC checks that were made to ensure that the IPM results were properly incorporated into the VISTAS/ASIP inventory.

• The changes to the IPM results that S/L agencies requested be included in the VISTAS/ASIP inventory based on new inform ation that was not accounted for in the IPM runs.

• Summary of 2002 and 2009 EGU emissi ons by state for NOx and VOC

3.1.1 Chronology of the Development of EGU Projections Initially, VISTAS/ASIP considered three opti ons for developing the 2009 projection inventory for EGUs:

• 

# Option 1 – Use the results of IPM modeling conducted in support of the proposed CAIR base and control case analyses as the starting point and refine the projections with readily available inputs from stakeholders; thes e IPM runs were conducted for 2010, which VISTAS would use to represen t projected emissions in 2009.

• 

# Option 2 – Use the VISTAS/ASIP 2002 typical year as the starting point, apply growth factors from the Energy Information Administra tion, and refine future emission rates with stakeholder input regarding utilization rates, capacity, retirements, and new unit information.

• 

# Option 3 – Use the results of a new round of IPM modeling sponsored by VISTAS and the Midwest Regional Planning Organization (MRPO). These runs incorporated VISTAS specific unit and regul ation modified parameters, an d generate results for 2009 explicitly.

An additional consideration for each of the three options was the inclusion of emission projections developed by the S outhern Company specifically for their units. Southern Company is a super-regional company that owns EGUs in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and Mississippi and participates in VISTAS as an industry stakeh older. Southern Company used their energy budget forecast to project net generation and heat input for every existing and future Southern Company EGU for the year 2009. Further documentation of how Southern Company generated the 2009 inventory for their units can be found in Developing Southern Company Emissions and Flue Gas

# Characteristics for VISTAS Regional Haze Modeling (April 2005, presented at 14 th 

# International Emission Inventory Conference)

.
Each of these three options and the Southern Company projections were discussed in a series of conference calls with the VISTAS EGU Special Interest Work Group (SIWG) during the fall of 2004. During a conference call on December 6, 2004, the VISTAS EGU SIWG approved the use of the latest VISTAS/MRPO sponsored IPM runs (Option 3) to represent 2009 EGU forecasts of emissions the future year cases.

The Option 3 IPM modeling resulted from a jo int agreement by VISTAS and MRPO to work together to develop future year utility emissions based on IPM modeling. The decision to use IPM modeling was based in part on a study of utility forecast methods by E.H. Pechan and Associates, Inc. (Pechan) for MRPO, which recommended IPM as a viable methodology (see Electricity Generating Unit {EGU} Grow th Modeling Method Task 2 Evaluation , February 11, 2004). Although the USEPA used IPM recently to support their rulemaking for the CAIR, VISTAS stakeholders felt that ce rtain model inputs needed to be improved. Thus, VISTAS and MRPO decided to hire contra ctors to conduct new IPM modeli ng and to post-process the IPM results. Southern Company projections in 2009 were roughly comparable with IPM.

In August 2004, VISTAS/ASIP contracted with ICF to run IPM to provide utility forecasts for 2009 under two future scenarios – Base Case and CAIR Case. The Base Case represents the current operation of the power system under cu rrently known laws and regulations, including those that come into force in the study horizon. The CAIR Case is the Base Case with the proposed CAIR rule superimposed. The run resu lts were parsed at the unit level for 2009. The IPM output files were delivered by ICF in Nove mber, and the post-processed data files were delivered by Pechan in December 2004. Only the CAIR case was used in the final 2009 modeling.

On March 10, 2005, the USEPA issued the fina l CAIR. VISTAS and MRPO, in conjunction with other RPOs, conducted another round of IPM modeling, which reflected changes to control assumptions based on the final CAIR as well as additional changes to model inputs based on S/L agency and stakeholder comments. Severa l conference calls were conducted in the spring/summer of 2005 to discuss and provide co mments on IPM assumptions related to six main topics: power system operation, generating res ources, emission control technologies, set-up parameters and rule, financial assumptions, and fuel assumptions.

For the summer 2006 set of IPM runs, ICF genera ted two different parsed files. One file includes all fuel burning units (fossil, biomass, landfill gas), as well as, non-fuel burning units

# (hydro, wind, etc.). The second file contains just the fossil- fuel burning units (e.g., emissions from biomass and landfill gas are omitted). Th e RPOs decided to use the fossil-only file for modeling to be consistent with the USEPA, since the USEPA used the fossil only results for CAIR analyses. For the 10 VISTAS states, non- fossil fuels accounted for only 0.13 percent of the NOx emissions and 0.04 percent of th e SO2 emissions in the 2009 IPM runs

VISTAS/ASIP asked S/L agencies to review th e results of the summer 2006 set of IPM runs, which were incorporated into the VISTAS i nventory. The NCDAQ primarily reviewed and commented on the IPM results with respect to IPM decisions on NOx post-combustion controls and SO2 scrubbers.

3.1.2 VISTAS/MRPO IPM runs for EGU sources The following summary of the VISTAS/MRPO IPM ® 

# modeling is based on ICF’s documentation Future Year Electricity Generating Sector Emission Inventory Development Using the IPM ® 

# in Support of Fine Particulate Mass and Visibility Modeling in the VISTAS and Midwest RPO Regions , April 2005. The ICF documentation is to be used as an extension to EPA's proposed CAIR mode ling runs documented in Documentation Supplement for EPA Modeling Applications (V.2.1.6) Using the IPM , EPA 430/R-03-007, July 2003.

IPM provides “forecasts of least-cost capacity expansion, el ectricity dispatch, and emission control strategies for meeting energy demand and environmental, transmission, dispatch, and reliability constraints.” The underlying database in this modeling is USEPA’s National Electric Energy Data System (NEEDS) released with th e CAIR Notice of Data Availability (NODA). The NEEDS database contains the existing a nd planned/committed unit data in the USEPA modeling applications of IPM. NEEDS includes basic geographic, operating, air emissions, and other data on these generating uni ts. VISTAS States and stake holders provided changes for:

• NO x 

# post-combustion cont rol on existing units

• SO 2 

# scrubbers on existing units

• SO 2 

# emission limitations

• PM controls on existing units

• Summer net dependable capacity

• Heat rate for existing units

• SO 2 

# and NO x 

# control plans based on State ru les or enforcement settlements

# The years 2009 and 2018 were explicitly modeled in this set of runs.

3.1.3 Post-Processing of IPM Parsed Files The following summary of the VISTAS/MRPO IPM modeling is based on Pechan’s documentation LADCO IPM Model Parsed File Post -Processing Methodology and File Preparation , February 8, 2005. The essence of the IPM model post-processing methodology is to take an initial IPM model output file and transform it into air quality model input files. ICF via VISTAS/MRPO provided an in itial spreadsheet file contai ning unit-level records of both (1) “existing” units and (2) committe d or new generic aggregates.

All records have unit and fuel type data; existing, retrofit (for SO2 and NOx), and separate NOxcontrol information; annual SO2 and NOx emissions and heat input; summer season (MaySeptember) NOx and heat input; July day NOx a nd heat input; coal heat input by coal type; nameplate capacity (MW), and State FIPS code. Existing units also ha ve county FIPS code, a unique plant identifier (ORISPL) and unit ID (a lso called boiler ID) (BLR ID); generic units do not have these data. The processing includes esti mating various types of emissions and adding in control efficiencies, stack paramete rs, latitude-longitude coordinate s, and State identifiers (plant ID, point ID, stack ID, process ID). Additionally, the generic units are sited in a county and given appropriate IDs. This processing is described in more detail below.

The data are prepared by transforming the generi c aggregates into units similar to the existing units in terms of the available da ta. The generic aggregates are split into smaller generic units based on their unit types and cap acity, are provided a dummy OR IS unique plant and boiler ID, and are given a county FIPS code based on an al gorithm that sites each generic by assigning a sister plant that is in a county based on its a ttainment/nonattainment stat us. Within a State, plants (in county then ORIS plant code order) in attainment counties are used first as sister sites to generic units, followed by plants in PM2.5 nonattainment counties, followed by plants in 8-hour ozone nonattainment counties. Note th at no LADCO or VISTAS States provided blackout counties that would not be considered when siting generics, so this process is identical to the one used for the USEPA IPM post-processing.

SCCs were assigned for all units ; unit/fuel/firing/bottom type data were used for existing units’ assignments, while only unit and fuel type were used for generic units’ assignments. Latitudelongitude coordinates were assi gned, first using the USEPA-provide d data files, secondly using the September 17, 2004 Pechan in-house latitude -longitude file, and lastly using county centroids. These data were only used when th e data were not provide d in the 2002 NIF files. Stack parameters were attached, first using the USEPA-provided data files, secondly using a

# March 9, 2004 Pechan in-house stac k parameter file based on prev ious EIA-767 data, and lastly using an USEPA June 2003 SCC-based default stack parameter file. These data were only used when the data were not provided in the 2002 NIF files.

Additional data were required for estimating VOC, CO, filterable primary PM 10 

# and PM2.5, PM condensable, and NH 3 

# emissions for all units. Thus, ash and sulfur contents were assigned by first using 2002 EIA-767 values for existing units or SCC-based defaults; filterable PM10 and PM2.5 efficiencies were obtai ned from the 2002 EGU NEI that were based on 2002 EIA-767 control data and the PM Calculat or program (a default of 99.2 percent is used for coal units if necessary); fuel use was back calculated from th e given heat input and a default SCC-based heat content; and emission factors were obtained from an USEPA-approved October 7, 2004 Pechan emission factor file based on AP-42 emission factors. Note that this update d file is not the one used for estimating emissions for previous USEP A post-processed IPM files. Emissions for 28 temporal-pollutant combinations were estimate d since there are seven pollutants (VOC, CO, primary PM 10 

# and PM 2.5 

# , NH 3 

# , SO 2 

# and NO x 

# ) and four temporal periods (annual, summer season, winter season, July day).

The next step was to match the IPM unit ID s with the identifiers in VISTAS/ASIP 2002 inventory. A crosswalk file was used to obtain FIPS State and c ounty, plant ID (within State and county), and point ID. If the FIPS State and c ounty, plant ID and point ID are in the 2002 VISTAS NIF tables, then the process ID and stac k ID are obtained from the NIF; otherwise, defaults, described above, were used.

Pechan provided the post-processe d files in NIF 3.0 format. Two sets of tables were developed: “NIF files” for IPM units that have a crosswalk match and ar e in the 2002 VISTAS inventory, and “NoNIF files” for IPM units that are not in the 2002 VISTAS inventory (which includes existing units with or without a crossw alk match as well as generic units).

For the 2009 projections, VISTAS/ASI P states reviewed the PM and NH 3 

# emissions from EGUs as provided by Pechan and identifi ed significantly higher emissions in 2009 than in 2002. It was determined that Pechan used a set of PM and NH 3 

# emission factors that are “the most recent USEPA approved uncontrolled emission factors” for estimating 2009 emissions. These factors are most likely not the same emission factors us ed by States for estimating these emissions in 2002 for EGUs in the VISTAS/ASIP region. Thus , the emission increase from 2002 to 2009 was simply an artifact of the change in emission fact or, not anything to do with changes in activity or control technology application. Also, VISTAS/ASIP states identif ied an inconsistent use of SCCs for determining emission factors between the base and future years. The resolution of the PM and NH 3 

# problem is fully documented in EGU Emission Factors and Emission Factor

# Assignment, memorandum from Greg Stella to VIST AS State Point Source Contacts and VISTAS EGU Special Interest Workgroup, June 13, 2005 (attached in Appendix P). The first step was the adjustment of the 2002 base year emissions inventory. Us ing the latest “USEPAapproved” uncontrolled emission factors by SCC, Alpine Geophysics utilized CERR or VISTAS/ASIP reported annual heat input, fuel throughput, heat, ash and sulfur content to estimate annual uncontrolled emissions for units identified as output by IPM. This step was conducted for non-CEM pollutants (CO, VOC, PM, and NH 3 

# ) only. For PM emissions, the condensable component of emissions was calcu lated and added to the resulting PM primary estimations. The resulting emissions were then adjusted by any control efficiency factors reported in the CERR or VISTAS data collectio n effort. The second adjustment was to the future year inventories. Alpi ne Geophysics updated the SCCs in the future year inventory to assign the same base year SCC. Using the same methods as described for the 2002 revisions, those non-IPM generated pollutants were estimated using IPM predicted fuel characteristics and base year 2002 SCC assignments.

3.1.4 Eliminating Double Counting of EGU Units The following procedures were used to avoi d double counting of EGU emissions in the 2009 point source inventory. The 2002 VISTAS point source emission i nventory contai ns both EGUs and non-EGUs. Since this file contains bot h EGUs and non-EGU point sources, and EGU emissions are projected using the IPM, it was ne cessary to split the 2002 poi nt source file into two components. The first component contains those emission units acco unted for in the IPM forecasts. The second component contains all ot her point sources not accounted for in IPM.

As described in the previous section, Pechan developed 2009 NIF files for EGUs from the IPM parsed files. All IPM matched units were initially removed from the 2009 Point source inventory to create the non-EGU inventor y (which was projected to 2009 using the non-EGU growth and control factors described in Section 3.2.1). This was done on a unit-by-unit basis based on a cross-reference table that matches IPM emission unit identifiers (ORISPL plant code and BLRID emission unit code) to VISTAS NIF emission uni t identifiers (FIPSST state code, FIPSCNTY county code, State Plant ID, State Point ID). When there was a match between the IPM ORISPL/BLRID and the VISTAS emission unit ID, the unit was assigned to the EGU inventory; all other emission units were assi gned to the non-EGU inventory.

If an emission unit was contained in the NIF f iles created by Pechan fr om the IPM output, the corresponding unit was removed from the in itial 2009 Point source inventory. The NIF 2009 EGU files from the IPM parsed files were then merged with the non-EGU 2009 files to create the 2009 Point source files.

# Next, MACTEC prepared several ad-hoc QA/QC queries to verify that there was no doublecounting of emissions in the EGU and non-EGU inventories:

• MACTEC reviewed the IPM parsed files to identify EGUs accounted for in IPM. MACTEC compared this list of emission uni ts to the non-EGU inve ntory derived from the VISTAS cross-reference table to verify that units accounted for in IPM were not double-counted in the non-E GU inventory. As a result of this comparison, MACTEC made a few adjustments in the cross-reference table to add emission units for four plants to ensure these units accounted for in IPM were moved to the EGU inventory.

• MACTEC reviewed the non-EGU inventory to identify remaining emission units with a Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code of “4911 Electrical Serv ices” or SCC of “1- 01-xxx-xx External Combustion Bo iler, Electric Generation”.

• MACTEC compared the list of sources meeting these selection criteria to the IPM parsed file to ensure that these units were not double-counted.

MACTEC asked S/L agencies to review the 2009 Point source inventory to verify whether there was any double counting of EGU emissions.

3.1.5 Quality Assurance steps Quality assurance was an important component to the inventory development process and MACTEC performed the following QA steps on th e EGU component of the VISTAS revised 2009 EGU inventory:

1. Provided parsed files (i.e., Excel spreadsheets that provide un it-level results derived from the model plant projections obtained by the IP M) to the VISTAS EGU SIWG for review and comment.

2. Provided facility level emission summarie s for 2009 for both the base case and CAIR case to the VISTAS EGU SIWG to ensure that emissions were consis tent and that there were no missing sources.

3. Compared State-level emissions from the IP M parsed files with the post-processed NIF files to verify that the post-processed NIF files were consistent with the IPM parsed file results.

# VISTAS requested S/L review of these files – th e changes specified by North Carolina as a result of this review are documented in the following subsection.

3.1.6 S/L Adjustments to IPM Modeling Results After the S/L agency review of the final set of IPM runs, S/L agencies specified a number of changes to the IPM results to better reflect current information on when and where future controls would occur. These changes to the IP M results primarily invol ved S/L agency addition or subtraction of future emission controls based on the best available data from state rules, enforcement agreements, compliance plans, permits, and discussions/commitments from individual companies.

For example,Duke Energy and Progress Energy ha ve updated their plans for complying with North Carolina’s Clean Smokestack Act. The em issions outlined in the North Carolina’s Clean Smokestacks Act compliance plans varied substantially from the IPM results. As a result, NCDAQ requested that the IPM emission projections for 2009 be adjusted to correspond with the compliance plans submitted in 2006 from the Duke Energy and Progress Energy.

Some S/L agencies specified changes to the c ontrols assigned by IPM to reflect their best estimates of emission controls. The VISTAS /ASIP contractors used a scrubber control efficiency of 90 percent when adding or re moving SO2 scrubber controls, used a control efficiency of 90 percent when adding or removi ng NOx SCR controls at coal-fired plants, 80 percent when adding or removing NOx SCR contro ls at gas-fired plants, and 35 percent when adding or removing NOx SNCR controls. The speci fic changes from NCDAQ to the IPM results are also summarized in Table 3.1.6-1.

S/L agencies provided informati on and/or comment on changes in stack parameters from the 2002 inventory for the 2009 inventory. Changes to stack parameters were also made in cases where new controls are scheduled to be installed. In cases wher e an emission unit projected to have a SO 2 

# scrubber in 2009, some states were able to provide revised stack parameters for some units based on design features fo r the new control system. Othe r units projected to install scrubbers by 2009 are not far enough along in the design process to ha ve specific design details. For those units, the VISTAS EGU SIWG made th e following assumptions: 1) the scrubber is a wet scrubber; 2) keep the current stack height the same; 3) keep the current flow rate the same, and 4) change the stack exit temp erature to 169 degrees F (this is the virtual temperature derived from a wet temperature of 130 degrees F). VIST AS determined that exit temperature (wet) of 130 degrees F +/- 5 degrees F is representativ e of different size units and wet scrubber technology.

# Table 3.1.6-1 NCDAQ Adjustments to IP M Results for the 2009 EGU Inventory.

Plant Name and ID Unit Nature of Update/Correction

G G Allen (2718)
Belews Creek (8042)1
Buck (2720)
Cliffside (2721)
Dan River (2723)
Marshall (2727)
Riverbend (2732) All Replaced all IPM 2009 resu lts with emission projections from Duke Power’s NC Clean Smokestacks Act Compliance Plan for 2006.

Asheville (2706)
Cape Fear (2708)
Lee (2709)
Mayo (6250)
Roxboro (2712)
Sutton (2713)
Weatherspoon (2716) All Replaced all IPM 2009 resu lts with emission projections from Progress Energy’s NC Clean Smokestacks Act Compliance Plan for 2006.

Dwayne Collier Battle Cogeneration Facility

ORISID=10384 GEN1

GEN2 Dwayne Collier Battle is a duplicate entry. This is Cogentrixof Rocky Mount (37-065-3706500146, stacks G-26 and G27). Duplicate entries were removed from the 2009 inventory.
Kannapolis Energy Partners

ORISID=10626 GEN2

GEN3 Kannapolis Energy emissions are being used as credits for another facility. IPM emissions from this facility (37-025- ORIS10626) were removed from the EGU inventory for 2009. Emissions from Kannapolis Energy (37-025- 3702500113) were carried forward in the 2009 inventory.



# 3.1.7 Summary of 2009 EGU Point Source Inventory Tables 3.1.7-1 and 3.1.7-6 summarize the 2002 base year inventory and 2009 projection inventory for the EGU source sector. The 2009 i nventory include the adjustments to the IPM results specified by the S/L agencies in the previous section.

# Table 3.1.7-1 EGU Point Source SO 2 

# Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009

State 2002 VISTAS 2009 IPM Based with S/L Adjustments
AL 447,828 378,052

FL 453,631 186,055

GA 514,952 417,449

KY 484,057 290,193

MS 67,429 76,579

NC 477,990 242,286

SC 206,399 124,608

TN 334,151 255,410

VA 241,204 225,653

WV 516,084 277,489

Total 3,743,725 2,473,774



# Table 3.1.7-2 EGU Point Source NOx Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009.

State 2002 VISTAS 2009 IPM Based with S/L Adjustments

AL 161,038 82,305

FL 257,677 86,165

GA 147,517 98,497

KY 198,817 92,021

MS 43,135 36,011

NC 151,854 66,522

SC 88,241 46,915

TN 157,307 66,405

VA 86,886 66,219

WV 230,977 86,328

Total 1,523,449 727,388

# Table 3.1.7-3 EGU Point Source VOC Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009.

State 2002 VISTAS 2009 IPM Based with S/L Adjustments

AL 2,295 2,473

FL 2,524 1,910

GA 1,244 2,314

KY 1,487 1,369

MS 648 404

NC 988 954

SC 470 660

TN 926 932

VA 754 778

WV 1,180 1,361

Total 12,516 13,155



# Table 3.1.7-4 EGU Point Source PM 10 

# -PRI Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009

State 2002 VISTAS 2009 IPM Based with S/L Adjustments

AL 7,646 6,969

FL 21,387 9,007

GA 11,224 17,891

KY 4,701 6,463

MS 1,633 4,957

NC 22,754 22,152

SC 21,400 19,395

TN 14,640 15,608

VA 3,960 5,508

WV 4,573 5,657

Total 113,918 113,607

# Table 3.1.7-5 EGU Point Source PM 2.5 

# -PRI Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009

State 2002 VISTAS 2009 IPM Based with S/L Adjustments

AL 4,113 3,921

FL 15,643 5,910

GA 4,939 10,907

KY 2,802 4,279

MS 1,138 4,777

NC 16,498 15,949

SC 17,154 16,042

TN 12,166 13,092

VA 2,606 4,067

WV 2,210 2,940

Total 79,269 81,884



# Table 3.1.7-6 EGU Point Source NH 3 

# Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009

State 2002 VISTAS 2009 IPM Based with S/L Adjustments

AL 317 359

FL 234 1,631

GA 83 686

KY 326 400

MS 190 333

NC 54 445

SC 142 343

TN 204 227

VA 127 694

WV 121 330

Total 1,798 5,448 

# Note: Emission summaries above are base d on SCC’s 1-01-xxx-xx and 2-01-xxx-xx-xx

# 3.2 Non-EGU Emission Projections
The general approach for assembling future year data was to use recently updated growth and control data consistent with the data used in the USEPA’s CAIR analyses , supplement these data with available stakeholder input, and provide the results for stakeholder review to ensure credibility. The VISTAS/ASIP contractor us ed the 2002 VISTAS/ASIP base year inventory, based on the 2002 CERR submittals as the startin g point for the non-EGU projection inventory. The 2002 VISTAS/ASIP point source emission inve ntory contains both EGUs and non-EGUs. Since this file contains both EGUs and nonEGU point sources, and EGU emissions are projected using the IPM, it was necessary to split the 2002 point source file in to two components. The first component contains those emission units accoun ted for in the IPM forecasts. The second component contains all other point sources notaccounted for in IPM and constitutes the nonEGU emissions inventory.

MACTEC performed the following activities to apply growth a nd control factors to the 2002 non-EGU emissions inventory to genera te the 2009 projection inventory:

• 

# Obtained, reviewed, and applied the most current growth factors developed by EPA, based on forecasts from an updated Regi onal Economic Models, Inc. (REMI) model (version 5.5) and the latest Annual Energy Outlook published by the Department of Energy (DOE);

• 

# Obtained, reviewed, and applied any State-sp ecific or sector-specific growth factors submitted by stakeholders;

• 

# Obtained and incorporated information regard ing sources that have shut down after 2002 and set the emissions to zero in the projection inventories;

• 

# Obtained, reviewed, and app lied control assumptions;

• 

# Provided data files in NIF3.0 format and emission summaries in EXCEL format for review and comment; and

• 

# Updated the database with corrections or ne w information from S/L agencies based on their review of the 2009 inventory.

The following sections discu ss each of these steps.

# 3.2.1 Growth assumptions for non-EGU sources The growth factor data used in developing th e emission inventory were consistent with the USEPA’s analyses for the CAIR rulemaking. Thes e growth factors are fu lly documented in the reports entitled Development of Growth Factors for Future Year Modeling Inventories (dated April 30, 2004) and CAIR Emission Inventory Overview (dated July 23, 2004). Three sources of data were used in developing the growth factors for the 2009 emissions inventory:

• 

# State-specific growth rates from the Re gional Economic Model, Inc. (REMI) Policy Insight ® 

# model, version 5.5 (being used in the development of the EGAS Version 5.0). The REMI socioeconomic data (output by indus try sector, population, farm sector value added, and gasoline and oil expenditures) ar e available by 4-digit SIC code at the State level.

• 

# Energy consumption data from the DOE’s Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) Annual Energy Outlook 2004, w ith Projections through 2025 for use in generating growth factors for non-EGU fuel combustion sources. These data include regional or national fuel-use forecast data that were ma pped to specific SCCs for the non-EGU fuel use sectors (e.g., commercial coal, industria l natural gas). Growth factors for the residential natural gas combustion category, fo r example, are based on residential natural gas consumption forecasts that are reported at the Census division level. These Census divisions represent a group of States (e.g., the South Atla ntic division includes eight southeastern States and the District of Columbia). Alt hough one would expect different growth rates in each of these States due to unique demographic and socioeconomic trends, all States within each divi sion received the same growth rate.

• 

# Specific changes for sectors (e.g., plastics, synthetic rubber, carbon black, cement manufacturing, primary metals, fabricated me tals, motor vehicles and equipment) where the REMI-based rates were unrealistic or hi ghly uncertain. Growth projections for these sectors were based on industry group forecas ts, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) projections and Bureau of Ec onomic Analysis (BEA) histor ical growth from 1987-2002.

In addition to the growth data described above, VISTAS received two sets of growth projections from stakeholders. The American Forest a nd Paper Association (A F&PA) supplied growth projections for the pulp and paper sector, wh ich were applied to SIC 26xx Paper and Allied Products, for growth from 2002 to 2009. The AF&PA projection factor (1.067) is for the United States industry and apply to all States equally. The number come from the 15-year forecast for world pulp and recovered paper prepared by Res ource Information Systems Inc. (RISI). The

# VISTAS/ASIP contractor used th e above AF&PA growth factors by SIC instead of the factors obtained from the USEPA’s CAIR anal ysis for the 2009 emission inventory.

NCDAQ considered recent projections for three key sectors in North Carolina where declining production was anticipated – SIC 22xx Textile M ill Products, 23xx Apparel and Other Fabrics, and 25xx Furniture and Fixtures. For the 2009 inventory, NCDAQ decided to use a growth factor of 1.0 for these SIC codes. Although NC DAQ has data that shows a steady decline in these industries in North Carolina, NCDAQ want ed to maintain the emission levels at 2002 levels so the future emission reduction credits were available in the event that they are needed for nonattainment areas.

For the 2009 inventory, the VISTAS/ASIP contractor made one additional change to the growth factors. The AEO2004 data was replaced with th e more recent AEO2006 forecasts (released in February 2006) to reflect changes in the ener gy market and to improve the emissions growth factors produced. The VISTAS/ASIP cont ractor obtained the corresponding AEO2006 projection tables from DOE’s web site. VISTAS developed tables comparing the growth factors based on AEO2004 and AEO2006 and these compar ison tables were reviewed by the S/L agencies. Based on this review , the VISTAS/ASIP states decide d to use the AEO2006 growth factors for fuel burning SCCs.

VISTAS used the USEPA’s EGAS model a nd updated the correspond ing AEO2006 projection tables to create growth factors by SCC. VI STAS applied the updated growth factors to 2002 actual emissions and replaced the 2009 emissions in NIF EM tables for the affected SCCs.

3.2.2 Control Programs applied to non-EGU sources VISTAS developed two control scenarios: on- the-books (OTB) controls and on-the-way (OTW) controls. The OTB control scenario accounts for post-2002 emission reductions from recently promulgated federal, State, local, and site-spe cific control programs. Th e OTW control scenario accounts for proposed (but not final) control programs that are reas onably anticipated to result in post-2002 emission reductions. The methodologies us ed to account for the emission reductions associated with these emission control progr ams are discussed in the following sections.

Table 3.2.2-1 Non-EGU Point Source Control Programs Included in 2009 Inventory. On-the-Books (Cut-off of July 1, 2004 for Base 1 adoption)

• Atlanta / Northern Kentucky / Birmingham 1-hr SIPs

## • Industrial Boiler/Process Heater/RICE MACT

• NO x 

## RACT in 1-hr NAA SIPs

• NO x 

## SIP Call (Phase I- except where States have adopted II already e.g. NC)

• RFP 3 percent Plans where in place for one hour plans

• VOC 2-, 4-, 7-, and 10-year MACT Standards

• Combustion Turbine MACT

On-the-Way

• NO x 

## SIP Call (Phase II – remaining States & IC engines)



# 3.2.2.1 OTB - NOx SIP Call (Phase I) Phase I of the NOx SIP call applies to certain large non-EGUs, in cluding large industrial boilers and turbines, and cement kilns. States in the VISTAS region affected by the NOx SIP call have developed rules for the contro l of NOx emissions that have been approved by the USEPA. VISTAS reviewed the available State rules and guidance documents to de termine the affected sources and ozone season allowances. VISTAS also obtained and reviewed information in the EPA’s CAMD NOx Allowance Tracking System – Allowances Held Report. Since these controls are to be in effect by the year 2007, VISTAS capped the emissions for NOx SIP call affected sources at 2007 levels and carried forw ard the capped levels for the 2009 future year inventory.

3.2.2.2 OTB - Industrial Boiler/Process Heater MACT The USEPA anticipates reductions in PM and SO 2 as a result of the I ndustrial Boiler/Process Heater MACT standard. The methods used to acc ount for these reductions are the same as those used for the CAIR analysis. Reductions were in cluded for existing units firing solid fuel (coal, wood, waste, biomass), which had a design capac ity greater than 10 mmBtu/hr. The USEPA prepared a list of SCCs for solid fuel industria l, commercial/ institutional boilers and process heaters. The VISTAS/ASIP contra ctor identified boilers greater than 10 mmBtu/hr using either the boiler capacity from the VISTAS 2002 invent ory, or if the boiler capacity was missing, a default capacity based on a methodology de veloped by the USEPA for assigning default capacities based on SCC code. The applied MACT control efficiencies were 4 percent for SO2 and 40 for percent for PM10 and PM2.5.

# 3.2.2.3 OTB - 2, 4, 7, and 10-year MACT Standards
Maximum achievable control technology (MACT) requirement s were also applied, as documented in the report entitled Control Packet Development and Data Sources, dated July 14, 2004. The point source MACTs and associated em ission reductions were designed from Federal Register (FR) notices and discussions with the USEPA’s Emission Standards Division (ESD) staff. VISTAS did not apply reductions for MACT standards with an initial compliance date of 2001 or earlier, assuming that the effects of thes e controls are already accounted for in the 2002 inventories supplied by the States . Emission reductions were applied only for MACT standards with an initial compliance da te of 2002 or greater.

3.2.2.4 OTB Combustion Turbine MACT The projection inventory does not include the NOx co-benefit effects of the MACT regulations for Gas Turbines or stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines, which the USEPA estimates to be small compared to the overall inventory.

3.2.2.5 OTW - NOx SIP Call (Phase II)
The final Phase II NOx SIP call rule was fi nalized on April 21, 2004. States had until April 21, 2005, to submit SIPs meeting the Phase II NOx budget requirements. The Phase II rule applies to large IC engines, which are primar ily used in pipeline transmission service at compressor stations. VISTAS identified affect ed units using the same methodology as was used by the USEPA in the proposed Phase II rule (i.e ., a large IC engine is one that emitted, on average, more than 1 ton per day during 2002). The final rule reflects a control level of 82 percent for natural gas-fired IC engines and 90 per cent for diesel or dual fuel categories. North Carolina provided more specific information on the anticipated controls at the compressor stations. This information was used in the 2009 inventory instead of the default approach used by the USEPA in the pr oposed Phase II rule.

3.2.2.6 Clean Air Interstate Rule CAIR does not require or assume additional emission reductions from non-EGU boilers and turbines.

3.2.3 Quality Assurance steps Final QA checks were run on the revised projecti on inventory data set to ensure that all corrections provided by the S/L agencies and stake holders were correctly incorporated into the

# S/L inventories and that there we re no remaining QA issues that could be addressed during the duration of the project. After exporting the inventory to ASCII text files in NIF 3.0, the USEPA QA program was run on the ASCII files and the QA output was reviewed to verify that all QA issues that could be a ddressed were resolved.

Throughout the inventory developm ent process, quality assuran ce steps were performed to ensure that no double counting of emissions occurred, and to ensu re that a full and complete inventory was developed for North Carolina. Quality assurance was an important component to the inventory development process and MACT EC performed the following QA steps on the point source component of the VISTAS inventory:

1. Facility level emission summaries were pr epared and evaluated to ensure that emissions were consistent and reasonable . The summaries included base year 2002 emissions, 2009 projected emissions acc ounting only for growth, 2009 projected emissions accounting for both growth and emission reductions from CAA controls.

2. State-level non-EGU comparisons (by polluta nt) were developed for the base year 2002 emissions, 2009 projected emissions acco unting only for growth, 2009 projected emissions accounting for both growth and emission reductions from CAA controls.

3. Data product summaries and raw NIF 3.0 data files were provided to the VISTAS Emission Inventory Technical Advisor and to the Point Source, EGU, and non-EGU Special Interest Work Group representati ves for review and comment. Changes based on these comments were reviewed and approved by North Carolina point source contact prior to implementing the changes in the files.

4. Version numbering was used for all i nventory files developed. The version numbering process used a decimal system to track major and minor changes.

3.2.4 Summary of 2009 non-EGU Point Source Inventory

Tables 3.2.4-1 and 3.2.4-6 summarize the 2009 non- EGU point source inventory for NOx and VOC emissions.

# Table 3.2.4-1 Non-EGU Point Source SO 2 

# Emission Comparison for 2009 and 2009

State 2002 2009

AL 96,481 101,246

FL 65,090 65,511

GA 53,778 53,987

KY 34,029 36,418

MS 35,960 25,564

NC 44,123 42,536

SC 53,518 48,324

TN 79,604 70,678

VA 63,903 62,560

WV 54,070 55,973

Total 580,556 562,797



# Table 3.2.4-2 Non-EGU Point Source NO x 

# Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009

State 2002 2009

AL 83,310 69,409

FL 45,156 46,020

GA 49,251 50,353

KY 38,392 37,758

MS 61,526 56,397

NC 44,928 34,767

SC 42,153 40,019

TN 64,344 57,883

VA 60,415 51,046

WV 46,612 38,031

Total 536,087 481,683

# Table 3.2.4-3 Non-EGU Point Source VOC Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009

State 2002 2009

AL 47,037 46,644

FL 38,471 36,880

GA 33,709 34,116

KY 44,834 47,785

MS 43,204 37,747

NC 61,182 61,925

SC 38,458 35,665

TN 84,328 74,089

VA 43,152 43,726

WV 14,595 13,810

Total 448,970 432,387



# Table 3.2.4-4 Non-EGU Point Source PM 10 

# -PRI Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009

State 2002 2009

AL 25,240 25,421

FL 35,857 39,872

GA 21,610 23,103

KY 16,626 17,174

MS 19,472 19,245

NC 13,838 13,910

SC 14,142 13,370

TN 35,174 34,833

VA 13,252 13,048

WV 17,503 17,090

Total 212,714 217,066

# Table 3.2.4-5 Non-EGU Point Source PM25-PRI Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009

State 2002 2009

AL 19,178 19,230

FL 30,504 33,946

GA 17,462 18,982

KY 11,372 11,686

MS 9,906 9,199

NC 10,500 10,458

SC 10,245 9,390

TN 27,807 27,577

VA 10,165 9,988

WV 13,313 12,769

Total 160,452 163,225



# Table 3.2.4-6 Non-EGU Point Source NH 3 

# Emission Comparison for 2002 and 2009

State 2002 2009

AL 1,883 2,132

FL 1,423 1,544

GA 3,613 3,963

KY 674 760

MS 1,169 668

NC 1,180 1,285

SC 1,411 1,578

TN 1,613 1,841

VA 3,104 3,049

WV 332 341

Total 16,402 17,161

# Appendix F.2

Area and Nonroad Mobile Sources Emissions Inventory Documentation

## Area & Nonroad Mobile Sources Documentation i The Hickory And Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC PM2.5 Appendix F.2 North Carolina Attainment Demonstration August 21, 2009 

# (This page intentionally left blank)

## Area & Nonroad Mobile Sources Documentation ii The Hickory And Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC PM2.5 Appendix F.2 North Carolina Attainment Demonstration August 21, 2009 

# TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE ............................................................................................... 1

2. OVERALL METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................. 2

2.1 SOURCE CATEGORY IDENTIFICATION ...................................................................... 2
2.2 AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATION APPROACH .............................................. 2
2.3 NONROAD MOBILE SOURCE EMI SSION ESTIMATION APPROACH ..................... 4

3. NORTH CAROLINA-DEV ELOPED 2002 AREA SOURCE INVENTORY ......................... 6

3.1 GASOLINE DISTRIBUTION ........................................................................................... 6

3.1.1 Gasoline Dispensing Facilities ........................................................................................ 6 3.1.2 Aircraft Refueling ..................................................................................................... ...... 9
3.2 STATIONARY SOURCE SOLVENT EVAPORATION ................................................ 10

3.2.1 Dry Cleaning ........................................................................................................... ...... 10 3.2.2 Graphic Arts/Printing .................................................................................................. .. 11 3.2.3 Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing ................................................................................. 11 3.2.4 Auto Body Refinishing ................................................................................................. 13 3.2.5 Architectural Coatings ................................................................................................. . 14 3.2.6 Traffic Markings ....................................................................................................... .... 14 3.2.7 Industrial Surface Coating ............................................................................................ 15 3.2.8 Asphalt Paving ......................................................................................................... ..... 17 3.2.9 Roofing Operations ..................................................................................................... .. 18 3.2.10 Pesticide Application ................................................................................................. . 19 3.2.11 Commercial/Consumer Solvent Use ........................................................................... 24
3.3 BIOPROCESS EMISSION SOURCES ............................................................................ 25

3.3.1 Bakeries................................................................................................................ ......... 25
3.4 OTHER MAN MADE AREA SOURCES ........................................................................ 25

3.4.1 Structure Fires ........................................................................................................ ....... 26 3.4.2 Charbroiling ........................................................................................................... ....... 26 3.4.3 Open Burning – Municipal Solid Waste and Yard Trimmings .................................... 27 3.4.4 Small Stationary S ource Fossil Fuel Use ...................................................................... 28 3.4.5 Vehicle Fires .......................................................................................................... ....... 38 3.4.6 Agricultural Burning ................................................................................................... .. 39 3.4.7 On Site Incineration ................................................................................................... ... 40

## Area & Nonroad Mobile Sources Documentation iii The Hickory And Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC PM2.5 Appendix F.2 North Carolina Attainment Demonstration August 21, 2009 

# 4. VISTAS DEVELOPED 2002 AREA SOURCE INVENTORY ............................................. 43 4.1 Ammonia from Agricultural Sources ................................................................................ 43 4.2 Paved and Unpaved Road Emissions ................................................................................. 43 4.3 Vehicle Refueling (Stage II) emissions ............................................................................. 44
4.4 Portable Fuel Containers ................................................................................................. ... 44 4.5 Fires Including Forest Fires ............................................................................................. .. 45 4.6 Application of Transportable Fracti on Adjustment Factors for Modeling ........................ 49

5. 2009 AREA SOURCE EMISSION INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT ................................... 50 5.1 Projection of Stationary Area Sources ................................................................................ 50 5.2 Projection of Agricultural Area Sources ............................................................................ 51 5.3 Projection of Forest Fires Area Sources ............................................................................ 51

6. VISTAS DEVELOPED 2002 NONROAD MOBILE SOURCE INVENTORY..................... 54

6.1 NONROAD Model Sources .............................................................................................. 54 6.2 Aircraft Engines ......................................................................................................... ........ 55
6.3 Railroad Locomotives ..................................................................................................... ... 56 6.4 Commercial Marine Vessel (CMV) ................................................................................... 57

7. 2009 NONROAD MOBILE SOURCE EMI SSION INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT .......... 61 7.1 Projection of NONROAD Mobile Sources ........................................................................ 61 7.2 Projection of Non-NONR OAD Model Sources ................................................................. 61

8. QUALITY ASSURANCE OF EMISSIONS INVENTORY ................................................... 66

8.1 2002 Area and Nonroad Mobile ........................................................................................ 66
8.2 2009 Area and Nonroad Mobile ........................................................................................ 67

9. ADDITIONAL DATA ............................................................................................................ .. 68

9.1 SIC TO NAICS CROSSWALK ........................................................................................ 69
9.2 FRACTION OF NAICS CODE EM PLOYMENT USED TO CREATE SIC EMPLOYMENT .................................................................................................................... . 117

## Area & Nonroad Mobile Sources Documentation iv The Hickory And Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC PM2.5 Appendix F.2 North Carolina Attainment Demonstration August 21, 2009 

# LIST OF TABLES

Table 3.1.1-1 Factors Used For Calculating Emission Factor ....................................................... 7
Table 3.1.1-2 Emission Factors Fo r Gasoline Dispensing .............................................................. 8 Table 3.2.3-1 Emission Factors Cleaning & Degreasing ............................................................. 12 Table 3.2.7-1 Per Capita Emission Fact ors For Industrial Surface Coating ................................ 16 Table 3.2.7-2 Per Employee Emission Factors for Industrial Surface Coating ........................... 16 Table 3.2.10-1 Agriculture Pesticides Application Rates ............................................................ 21 Table 3.2.10-2 Emission Factors by Crop Type .......................................................................... 23
Table 3.2.11-1 Misc. Non-I ndustrial Consumer-Commerc ial Emission Factors ........................ 24
Table 3.4.4-1 Fuel Use in North Carolina 2002 ........................................................................... 29
Table 3.4.4-2 Combustion Emission Factors ............................................................................... 30
Table 3.4.4.4-1 Emission Factors fo r Liquefied Petroleum Gas .................................................. 36
Table 3.4.7-1 Yield of Pollutant Values fo r Uncontrolled Refuse Combustors .......................... 41
Table 4.5-1 2002 North Carolina Actual and Typical Fire Emissions ........................................ 48 Table 4.5-2 2002 Fire Emissions Data (Typical ) Omitted From Modeling in Tons Per Year (TPY) ......................................................................................................................... ........... 49 Table 6.3-1 2002 National Rail Transportation En ergy Use by Fuel Type (Trillion BTU) ........ 57
Table 7.2-1 Estimated Emission Reducti on Impacts based on T-4 Rule ................................. 65
Table 7.2-2 Estimated Emission Reduction Impacts Relative to VISTAS 2002 Base Year Values ................................................................................................................... ........ 65

## Area & Nonroad Mobile Sources Documentation v The Hickory And Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC PM2.5 Appendix F.2 North Carolina Attainment Demonstration August 21, 2009 

# List of Acronyms

Acronym Definition AEO Annual Energy Outlook ATADS Air Traffic Activity Data System BTS Bureau of Transportation Statistics BTU British Thermal Units CAIR Clean Air Interstate Rule CERR Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule CMU Carnegie Mellon University CMV Commercial Marine Vessel CNG Compressed Natural Gas EDMS Emissions and Dispersion Modeling System EF Emission Factor EGAS 5.0 Economic Growth Analysis System version 5.0 EIA Energy Information Administration EIIP Emissions Inventory Improvement Program FAA Federal Aviation Administration GF Growth Factor HDD Heavy Duty Diesel IAQTR Interstate Air Quality Transport Rule LPG Liquid Petroleum Gas LTO Landing and Takeoff MSW Municipal Solid Waste NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAICS North American Indus try Classification System NCDAQ North Carolina Division of Air Quality NCDFR North Carolina Divisi on of Forest Resources NCDOT North Carolina Department of Transportation NCSU North Carolina State University NEI National Emissions Inventory NG Natural Gas NIF National Emissions I nventory Input Format NOx Nitrogen Oxides NWR National Wildlife Refuge OTAQ Office of Transpor tation and Air Quality PFC Portable Fuel Container PM Particulate Matter

## Area & Nonroad Mobile Sources Documentation vi The Hickory And Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC PM2.5 Appendix F.2 North Carolina Attainment Demonstration August 21, 2009 

# QA Quality Assurance RIA Regulatory Impact Analysis SCC Source Classification Code SI Spark-Ignition SIC Standard Industrial Classification SIWG Special Interest Workgroup T4 Tier 4 USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency USFA U.S. Fire Administration USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USFS U.S. Forest Service VISTAS Visibility Improve ment State & Tribal Association of the Southeast VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

## Area & Nonroad Mobile Sources Documentation vii The Hickory And Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC PM2.5 Appendix F.2 North Carolina Attainment Demonstration August 21, 2009 

# (This page intentionally left blank)

# 1. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE

The attainment modeling for the Davidson-Guilf ord-Catawba Counties, North Carolina Annual PM2.5 nonattainment area (referre d to as the PM2.5 nonattainment area) was performed by the Association of Southeastern Integrated Pla nning (ASIP) and done in conjunction with the regional haze modeling being done by the Southeas t Regional Planning Or ganization, Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS) and the ozone modeling being done by the ASIP. VISTAS and ASIP ar e run by the ten Southeast states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Ca rolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia). Since the regional haze modeling uses annual simulations and includes an intermediate year that is th e attainment year required for the PM2.5 nonattainment area, the North Carolina Division of Air Quality (NCDAQ) d ecided to use this modeling for its attainment demonstration.

A portion of the emissions inventory was de veloped by the NCDAQ and the VISTAS/ASIP contractors developed a portion. In all cases, a statewide emissi ons inventory was developed for modeling purposes and the emission estimates were calculated in tons per year. Sections 3 documents the portion of the 2002 base year area source annual emission s inventory that was developed by the NCDAQ. Section 4 documen ts the area source developed by VISTAS/ASIP and Section 5 addresses the development of the 2009 area source emissions inventory. Section 6 and 7 document the nonroad mobile source emissions inventory for 2002 and 2009, respectively.

A summary of the area source and nonroad mob ile source annual PM2.5 emissions, by source category, can be found in Appendix E.

# 2. OVERALL METHODOLOGY

2.1 SOURCE CATEGORY IDENTIFICATION

The area source categories were identified from U. S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA’s) guidance docu ment EPA-450/4-91-016, Procedures for the Preparation of Emission Inventories of Carbon Monoxide and Precursors of Ozone, Vol. 1 , from this point on this document will be referred to as the Procedures document; USEPA guidance document EPA454/R-05-001, Emissions Inventory Guidance for Impl ementation of Ozone and Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standar ds (NAAQS) and Regional Haze Regulation ; the Emissions Inventory Improvement Program (E IIP) Technical Reports, Volume 3, Area Sources as of December 2002 (the most curre nt version at the time of the inventory development), from this point on this document will be referred to as EIIP Tech Report ; and a report entitled, Documentation of the Base G 2002 Base Ye ar, 2009 and 2018, Emission Inventories for VISTAS and written by the VISTAS contr actor company, MACTEC, Inc.

Nonroad mobile sources were identified fr om the USEPA’s guidance document EPA-450/4-91- 016, Procedures for the Preparation of Emissi ons Inventories for Carbon Monoxide and Precursors of Ozone (Procedures document); and USEPA guidance document EPA-454/R-05- 001, Emissions Inventory Guidance for Implemen tation of Ozone and Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and Regional Haze Regulation . Nonroad mobile source emissions are estimated by the me thodologies suggested in the USEPA document, EPA-454/R-05-001, Emissions Inventory Gui dance for Implementation of Ozone and Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and Regi onal Haze Regulations ; EPA450/4-81-026d (Revised) Procedures for Emission Inventory Preparation, Volume IV; Mobile Sources (Mobile Source Procedures); and from the USEPA’s nonroad mobile model NONROAD2005c released March 21, 2006.

2.2 AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATION APPROACH

Area source emissions are estimated by multiplying an emission factor by some known indicator of collective activity for each source category with in the inventory area. An indicator is any parameter associated with the activity level of a source that can be co rrelated with the air pollutant emissions from that source, such as production, number of em ployees, or population.

In general, one of the following emissions estima tion approaches is used to calculate the area source emissions: per capita emission factors, employment-related emissi on factors, commodity

# consumption-related emission factor s, and level of activity based em ission factors. The emission factors used were obtained from the EIIP Tech Reports , the Procedures document or the USEPA’s AP

- 

# 42 Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Fifth Edition , referred to as AP-42

.
There are several methods for estimating the activ ity level for a specific area source category. These are: treating area sources as point sources , surveying local activity levels, apportioning national or statewide activity to tals to local inventory areas, using population or employment data. All of these methods were us ed to estimate area source emissions

Certain emission categories were adjusted for such things as season or rule effectiveness and rule penetration. These are discussed in the particular source categories descriptions.

For certain categories, there can be overlap between the point source emissions and the area source emissions calculated with emission factor s. The 2002 point source emissions in these categories were identified so that they could be subtracted where appropriate.

There are a number of categories where emission s were calculated with emission factors based on employment. These emission factors were developed by the USEPA when employment reports were organized by Standard Indus trial Classification (SIC) code. Since 1997 employment statistics are organized by the No rth American Industry Classification System (NAICS). For the solvent cleaning industries, th e SIC codes do not direct ly correspond to single NAICS code. Sometimes several partial NAICS empl oyment values will relate to a SIC code. A crosswalk was used to determine what per centage of a NAICS employment value would correspond to the SIC codes. The tables from the US Census showing the NAICS-SIC crosswalk are reproduced in Section 8 – Add itional Data. It should be noted that the crosswalk is based on national totals and is no t specific to any particul ar state. In Section 8.2, the employment fraction of the NAICS codes used to create the SI C code employment data is tabulated.

The employment numbers were obtained from th e on-line 2002 County Business Patterns for the various NAICS codes at the count y level for North Carolina. In addition to having employment values (or employment ranges due to confiden tiality rules) by NAICS, the County Business Patterns breaks down the number of facilities by employment cat egories. The employment categories are 1 – 4, 5 – 9, 10 – 19, 20 – 49, 50 – 99, 100 – 249, 250 – 499, 500 – 999, >1000 employees. To account for point sources, it was assumed that facilities with 100 employees or greater were point sources and were not considered in the calculations.

# When a NAICS category gave a number of employees and there were no establishments with 100 employees or greater, then the value was use d. However, in most cases the County Business Patterns gave a range of total em ployees in the county instead of the actual number. When this occurred, facility sizes were considered a nd the mid-range of employees was assumed, in accordance with the EIIP Tech. Report . For example, if a NAICS category for a county had a range of employment of 100-249 with two establis hments with 1 – 4 employees, one with 20-49 employees, and one with 100-249 employees. Assumi ng 3 to be the mid-range of 1 –4 and 35 to be the mid-range of 20-49, the employment used for the area source calculation was estimated

as:

(2 x 3) + (1 x 35) = 41 employees

The larger establishment was assumed to be a poi nt source and not taken into consideration for the area source calculation.

If a total number of employees was provided a nd there were establishments with 100 employees or greater, then the mid-range of the smaller facilities were used as described above. The estimated employment was compared to the valu e given to ensure that remainder would account for the large establishment. In cases where the remainder would not be enough employment to account for the larger establishment, the ar ea source employment was adjusted down. For example, if a NAICS category had 250 empl oyees with one establishment with 20 – 49 employees (mid-range 35), two establishments with 50 – 99 employees (mid-range 75), and one establishment with 100 – 249 employees. The empl oyment estimated for the area source and the remainder employment was estimated as:

(1 x 35) + (2 x 75) = 185 employees 250 – 185 = 65 employees

The remainder of 65 employees is not enough to account for an establishment of 100 – 249 employees. Therefore, the area source employment was adjusted down by 35 so that there were 100 employees remaining to account for the large establishment.

2.3 NONROAD MOBILE SOURCE EMIS SION ESTIMATION APPROACH

Non-highway mobile sources, some times referred to as off-road mobile, are those sources that can move but do not use the highway system. Off -road mobile sources are further divided into non-road mobile, railroad locomotives, aircraft e ngines, and commercial marine vessels (CMV).

# The estimation of emissions from mobile sources, like area sources, involves multiplying an activity level by an emission factor.

The majority of the off-road mobile emissions were estimated by using the USEPA’s off-road mobile model NONROAD2005c. Direct emissions are generated with this model. For aircraft engine emissions, the Federal Aviation Admi nistration (FAA) Emissions and Dispersion Modeling System (EDMS) model was used. Airc raft operations were inputted into the model and the model predicts the engine emissions ba sed on average landing and take-off practices for the aircraft type. For railroad locomotive em issions, emission factors were obtained from the Mobile Source Procedures document and the activity level was obtained from the various railroad companies.

# 3. NORTH CAROLINA-DE VELOPED 2002 AREA SOURCE INVENTORY

Area sources represent a collection of many small, unidentified points of air pollution emissions within a specified geographical area, emitting less than the minimum level prescribed for point sources. Because these sources are too sma ll and/or too numerous to be surveyed and characterized individually, all ar ea source activities are collectively estimated. The county is the geographic area for which emissions from area s ources are compiled, primarily because counties are the smallest areas for which data used for estimating emissions is readily available. Emissions are calculated on an annual basis in tons per year.

3.1 GASOLINE DISTRIBUTION

The area source emissions attributed to this ca tegory are associated with various operations related to gasoline and aircraft fuel handling a nd distribution. Since tank farms and bulk plants are specifically addressed in the point source i nventory, the area source category is limited to fuel handling, storage, and distri bution operations associated with the service stations and in the refueling of aircrafts.

3.1.1 Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Since service stations are so numerous, they are collectively considered as an area source. The area source emissions that are derived for this subsection involve determining the estimated emissions that occur at each of the following operations: 1) lo sses during storage tank filling, 2) storage tank breathing and working losses, 3) spillage and 4) truck transit losses. The emissions from vehicle refueling are captured in the mobile source inventory in the emission factors produced by the USEPA’s MOBILE6.2 model and therefore are not estimated as part of the area source inventory.

As part of the air toxics program , Stage I controls for gasoline di spensing facilities were adopted by the State, effective May 1990 with final comp liance by January 1, 1994. Stage I is the vapor recovery technology on the underground storage tanks and reduces the emissions during the tank filling operations at service stations.

The North Carolina Department of Agriculture, St andards Division is responsible for going to all gasoline dispensing facilities and testing the fuels to ensure that they meet the quality standards of the State. The NCDAQ has worked out an agreement with the Standards Division to also

# check for Stage I controls. A notice is sent to the NCDAQ for every facility checked by the Standards Division verifying if a facility has properly maintained control equipment. If a facility is not found to be properly main taining the control equipment, then the NCDAQ sends a notice of violation informing the facility that the cont rols are required and give s the facility time to correct the violation before fine s are assessed. From this information the rule effectiveness and rule penetration can be estimated. The rule eff ectiveness is the percentage of facilities with proper equipment maintenance and use and represents the actual degree of source compliance. Rule penetration is the percentage of facilitie s covered by the rule a nd thus require Stage I equipment. Control efficiency is the expected percent reduction from prope r application of this control technology.

The volatile organic compound (VOC) emission f actor for underground storage tank filling was calculated by using an equation from AP-42 , in Section 5.2, Transportation And Marketing Of Petroleum Liquids on page 5.2-4 (equation).

EF = 12.46 [SPM ] x [1-(RE x CE x RP)] [ T ]

where EF = emission factor in pounds of VOC per 1000 gallons S = Saturation factor P = True vapor pressure (i n pounds per square inch area) M = Molecular weight of vapors (lb/lb-mole) T = Temperature of bulk liquid ( o 

# Rankin) RE = Rule Effectiveness CE = Control Efficiency RP = Rule Penetration

The saturation factor was obtained from AP-42 , Table 5.2-1 and the true vapor pressure and molecular weight of vapors were obtained from AP-42 , Table 7.1-2. For the temperature an average of the June, July and August average monthly temperature for 2002 was used. A worst case temperature estimate was used year r ound in calculating annual emissions. These temperatures were obtained from the North Caro lina Climatological Data , a publication of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. All of the f actors used to calculate the emission factor for Stage I, i.e. balanced submerged filling, are listed in Table 3.1.1-1.

Table 3.1.1-1 Factors Used For Calculating Emission Factor
S P M T

1 6.49 67 537.6 o 

# R (77.6 o 

# F)

# EF = 12.46 ⎡ 1 x 6.49 x 67 ⎤ x [1 – ( .97 x .95 x .99)] ⎣ 537.6 ⎦ = 0.884 lb VOC/1000 gal. Gasoline

The emission factors for tank truck transit, breath ing losses and spillage were obtained from the EIIP Tech Report , Chapter 11 Gasoline Marketing, Table 11.3-1 and are listed below in Table 3.1.1-2. The tank truck trans it emission factor includes the emission rate for an empty tank plus a full tank and was adjusted by a fact or of 1.25 as recommended by the EIIP Tech Report , pg. 11.5-3.

Table 3.1.1-2 Emission Factor s For Gasoline Dispensing Underground Storage Tank Filling Tank Truck Transit Breathing Losses Spillage

0.884 lb/1000gal 0.000075 lb/gal 0.001 lb/gal 0.00068 lb/gal

The activity data needed to calcu late the emissions is number of gallons of fuel sold in each county per year. This was obtained from a repor t from the North Carolin a Petroleum Marketers Association. A weighting factor was devi sed by producing the su m of county population (1000’s), county registered vehicles (1000’s), and county moto r fuel outlets. The factors were summed for the 100 counties and a fractional part of the whole found for each county. This fraction was multiplied by the state total gallons of gasoline and diesel sold in 2002 to get an estimate of gallons of fuel per county.

According to the EIIP Tech Report, the activity days per week fo r truck transit and underground storage tank filling are 6 and 7 days per week and for spillage and breathing losses, respectively.

Note that diesel fuel used is combined with gasoline for the sake of simplification. This will result in some overestimation of VOC emissions because the volatility of gasoline is higher than diesel fuel.

Annual VOC emissions for underground storage tank filling, tank truck tran sit, breathing losses and spillage were calculated a nd SMOKE modeling was later used to allocate annual emissions to a daily level. Underg round storage tank annual VOC emissions for each county were calculated using the following equation.

# EM = FC x (1/1000) x EF x (1 ton/2000 lbs.)
where EM = annual county VOC emissions in tons per year FC = county fuel consumption of gasoline and diesel in gallons EF = emission factor in pounds of VOC per 1000 gallons

Tank truck transit, breathing losses, and spilla ge annual VOC emissions for each county were calculated individually, us ing the following equation.

EM = FC x EF x (1 ton/2000 lbs.)
where EM = annual county VOC emissions in tons per year for tank truck transit, breathing losses, or spillage FC = county fuel consumption of gasoline and diesel in gallons EF = emission factor in pounds of VOC pe r gallon for tank truck transit, breathing losses, or spillage

3.1.2 Aircraft Refueling Like vehicle refueling, aircraft refueling results in VOC emissions from displacement of the vapor-laden air in the aircraft’s fuel tank. This source category is generally estimated only for large commercial airports. There are a few small commuter and general av iation airports in the State; however, the amount of emissions from these is typically negligible.

The emissions from aircraft refueling were dete rmined by using the number of gallons of fuel supplied to the airports and multiplying it by th e appropriate emission factor. The businesses that supply the fuel to the airports were cont acted to determine the amount and type of fuel supplied to each airport during 2002. The info rmation obtained was for the two fuel types supplied, Jet A Kerosene and Aviation Gasoline.

The emission factors used are 11.38 lb VOC/100 0 gallons of aviation gasoline and 0.065 lb VOC/1000 gallons of Jet A kerosene . Airport refueling occurs on a daily basis, therefore the activity days per week are 7.

The annual emissions for the base year were calculated using equation 3.1.2-1.

EM i 

# = Thousand Gallons/year x EF i 

# ___ (2000 lbs/ton) 3.1.2-1

# where EM i 

# = emissions for source category (i) EF i 

# = emission factor for source category (i)

3.2 STATIONARY SOURCE SOLVENT EVAPORATION

There are eleven subcategories th at involve stationary source solvent evaporative emissions. They include: dry cleaning, gra phic arts, solvent clean ing, automotive refinishing, architectural coatings, traffic markings, i ndustrial surface coating, asphalt paving, roofing operations, pesticide application, and consum er/commercial solvent use. Th e methodology used to calculate the emissions from these sources are desc ribed in detail in each subsection.

3.2.1 Dry Cleaning The VOC emissions from dry cleaning vary with th e type of process and the solvent used. For the most part, dry cleaners (coin-operated a nd conventional commerci al) are small business entities. As a result of their size, dry cleani ng emissions are typically not captured as point sources. However, dry cleaning operations can be a significant emission source for VOC emissions, when take n collectively.

The emissions from dry cleaners are estimated by multiplying the number of employees at dry cleaners by a national per-employee emission fact or, 1800 lbs. of VOC/employee/year, found in the EIIP Tech. Report . The guidance also stated that th e number of employees can be found in the County Business Patterns for SIC code 7215 (coin-operated) and 7216 (commercial). In 1997, the SIC code system was replaced with the NAICS. Thus, the number of employees was obtained for NAICS codes 812310 (coin-operate d) and 812320 (commercial). The NAICS employment numbers were previously processe d to exclude any facili ties with 100 or more employees, which were deemed to be point sour ces. According to the SIC to NAICS crosswalk, 80% of employment for NAICS 812320 represents the number of employees for commercial dry cleaners (SIC 7216).

As reported in the EIIP Tech. Report , the activity days per week is 6 days. The emissions for 2002 were calculated using equation 3.2.1-1.

EM = Employees x EF (2000 lb/tons) 3.2.1-1

# where EM = emissions for source category in tons/year EF = emission factor for source cat egory, 1800 lbs. VOC/employee/yr

3.2.2 Graphic Arts/Printing Graphic arts include operations that are involved in printing of newspapers, magazines, books, and other printed materials, which can be di vided into several subsets based upon printing technology. Over the last decade ink-jet and offs et lithography have emerged as the dominant technologies. The use of oils as ink solven ts and the reduction of alcohols in the fountain solution and in the cleanup solutions have resulted in notable reductions in emissions for offset lithography. Ink-jet printi ng results in essentiall y no VOC emissions.

A number of establishments that generate emissi ons in this source category are in-house graphic arts operations at plants that ar e in non-printing industr ies. Therefore, an employee per SIC code emission factor is not very reliable. The per- capita emission factor of 1.3 lbs VOC/person/year provided by the EIIP Tech. Report was used to calculate the VOC emissions. This emission factor estimates the emissions from facilities less than 100 t ons VOC/year. It assumes that facilities greater than 100 tons VOC/year will be in the point source in ventory. The population used to calculate the base year emissions was obtained from the North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management (OSBM).

According to the Procedures document, Table 5.8-1, the activity days per week is 5. The annual emissions for the base year were calculated using equation 3.2.2-1.

EM = ((EF)*(Population 2002 

# )*(1 ton/2000 lb)) 3.2.2-1

where EM = emissions for source categor y for county (a) in tons/yr EF = emission factor for source category, 1.3 lbs VOC/person/yr

3.2.3 Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing Solvent cleaning operations are in tegral to many businesses and i ndustries, and are conducted for the purpose of removing grease, oils, waxes, carb on deposits, etc. from metals, plastic, or glass surfaces. Solvent cleaning is usually performed prior to painting, plating, inspection, repair, assembly, etc. The solvents used in the cleani ng operations can be either in a liquid or vapor phase. Generally, these solvents have high vapor pressures and therefore emit VOC emissions.

# There are two basic types of so lvent cleaning techniques, cold cleaning and vapor cleaning. Cold cleaning machines use solvents in the liqui d phase to clean and remove foreign material such as oils and grease from the surface of ma terials. These machines are batch loaded, and cleaning operations include spraying/flushing solv ent or parts agitation, wipe cleaning, brushing, and immersion.

The vapor cleaning technique can be further divided into open top degreasing and in-line cleaning. The open top degreasing machines are ta nks designed to generate and contain solvent vapor. The tank is equipped with a heating system that boils the liquid solvent. As the solvent boils, dense solvent vapors rise and displace the air in the ta nk. Coolant is circulated in condensing coils on the top of the tank to crea te a controlled vapor zone within the tank. Condensing solvent vapors dissolve the contaminants on the surface of the workload and flush both the dissolved and undissolved c ontaminants from the workload.

In-line cleaning machines employ automated load ing on a continuous basis. These machines are often custom made for large-scale operations. A continuous or multiple-batch loading system greatly reduces or even eliminates the manual pa rts handling associated w ith batch cleaning. Inline cleaning machines are enclosed to prevent solvent losses; however, entry and exit openings cannot be sealed.

The VOC emissions for this category are estimat ed by using the per employee factors (from the EIIP Tech. Report , Chapter 6, Table 6.5-2) listed in Table 3.2.3-1 below:

Table 3.2.3-1 Emission Factors Cleaning & Degreasing Source Category Lbs. VOC/employee/yr Electronic and Other Elec: Open Top Degreasing 29 Miscellaneous Manufacturing: Open Top Degreasing 9.8 Miscellaneous Manufactur ing: Cold Cleaning 24 Auto Repair Services: Cold Cleaning 270

Employment data was derived from the 2002 C ounty Business Patterns provided by the U. S. Census Bureau. For each of these categories, em ployment in a number of SIC groups is needed. These employment numbers were generated fr om the NAICS employment numbers for each county and summed as needed. See SIC Code s from NAICS Codes for Employment Based Categories in Section 8.1 for the full listing of NAICS and SIC for each source category. Fractional employee numbers are a result of the NAICS to SIC conversion process.

# The annual emissions for the base year were calculated using equation 3.2.3-1.

EM = (Employment 2002 

# ) x EF (2000 lb/tons) 3.2.3-1

where EM = emissions for source category, tons per year EF = emission factor for source category

3.2.4 Auto Body Refinishing Auto body refinishing operations consist of: ve hicle preparation, primer application, topcoat application, and spray equipment cleaning. Th ese operations result in significant VOC emissions. The solvent is typically 100% vol atile and can constitute up to 6.5 pounds of VOC per gallon of cleaner or paint.

The EIIP methodology for estimating emissions from this source category recommends apportioning a national VOC emission estimate to the county level by the number of employees reported for NAISC code 811121. The national es timate of 79,429.59 tons of VOC per year was based on 1997 data. In order to estimate the emissions for 2002, the 199 7 national VOC estimate provided by the EIIP Tech. Report was divided by the 1997 national employment data to create a per employee emission factor.

This emission factor was used with the 2002 employment data to estimate emissions from auto body refinishing. The employment data was obtai ned from the 2002 County Business Patterns.

According to the EIIP Tech. Report the activity days per week is 5 days. The emissions for 2002 were calculated us ing equation 3.2.4-1.

EM = Employees x EF 3.2.4-1

where EM = emissions for source category EF = emission factor for source cat egory, 0.387 tons VOC/employee/yr

# 3.2.5 Architectural Coatings This category includes the appli cation of paint, primer, varnis h or lacquer to architectural surfaces, and the use of solvents as thinners and for cleanup.

The VOC emissions for this source category we re estimated by multiplying county population data by a usage factor for either water or solvent ba sed coatings, and an emissions factor for either water or solvent based coatings. This met hod entails gathering nation al architectural paint usage from the County Business industrial report MA325F and genera ting per capita usage factors. It is important to be able to differentiate between the water based usage from the solvent based usage since the emission factor for solven t based paints is over 5 times higher than the factor for water based paints.

Emissions Factor: Water based = 0.74 lb VOC/gallon; Solvent Based= 3.87 lb VOC/gallon

VOC a 

# = (POP a 

# *UF b 

# *EF b 

# )/(2000lbs/ton) -- tons/year

Where: VOC a 

# = VOC emissions for county (a) POP a 

# = Population for county (a) EF b 

# = Emission factor for paint type (b) UF b 

# = Usage factor for paint type (b)
The usage factor is found by divi ding the national total architectu ral surface coating quantities for either solvent or water-based coatings by the U.S. population for that year. For 2002, the usage factor for each paint type is estimated below:

UF solvent: (127,703,000 gallons of solven t based) / (287,973,924) = 0.443 gal./person UF water : (589,527,000 gallons of water based) / (287,973,924) = 2.047 gal./person

3.2.6 Traffic Markings The paint used in traffic markings operations (t he painting of center lines , shoulders, etc.) emits VOC emissions during the drying process. The exte nt of emissions is largely a function of the paint being solvent or water based. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) utilizes three general ty pes of paint, which can be classifi ed as water based paint, epoxy paint containing organic solvents, and th ermoplastic paint. The use of thermoplastic paint results in negligible VOC emissions and therefore is not included in the em issions inventory.

# Although the NCDOT utilizes both water and solvent based paints , there is uncertainty with respect to what percentage of the paint used is organic solvent based. To avoid under estimating the emissions from this source category, it is assumed that all paint, excluding thermoplastic, is organic solvent-based.

The NCDOT reported that 854,215 gallons of paint we re used statewide in 2002. The gallons of paint by county were apportioned by number of la ne miles in the county divided by the state total (equation 3.2.6-1) and the estimated gallons use d. The emission factor was obtained from the EIIP Tech. Report , Table-14.4-1, which gave the emission fact or as a function of gallons of paint (3.64 lb VOC/gal.). The solvent-based emissi on factor was chosen because all paint was assumed to be organic solvent-based as described above.

Gallons Paint County 

# = (Gallons Paint State 

# ) x (# Paved Lane Miles) County 

# 3.2.6-1 (# Paved Lane Miles) State



# The emissions for 2002 were cal culated using equation 3.2.6-2.

EM = Gallons Paint x EF 3.2.6-2 (2000 lb/ton)

where EM = emissions for source category EF = emission factor for source category

3.2.7 Industrial Surface Coating Surface coating operations involve applying a thin layer of coati ng (e.g. paint, lacquer, enamel, varnish, etc.) to the surface of an object for decorative or pr otective purposes. The coating products, which are solvent based, emit VOC emissions as the result of solvent evaporation during the drying or curing process.

Ideally, the VOC emissions from industrial surface coating activities should be captured as point sources. From a practical standpoint, this is no t always accomplished. For example, three of the industrial surface coating subcategories, name ly other product coatings, high-performance maintenance, and other special purpose coatings , only utilized per capita emission factors and have no NAICS associated with them. The em ission factors, obtaine d from the EIIP Tech. Report , Table 8.5-2, for these surface coating subcategories are liste d in the Table 3.2.7-1 below.

# Table 3.2.7-1 Per Capita Emission Fa ctors For Industrial Surface Coating
Subcategory Per Capita Factor (lb/yr/person) Other product coatings High-performance maintenance. Other special purpose coatings 0.6 0.8 0.8

The emissions for the remaining industrial surface coating subcategories were estimated using per employee emission factors. These emission factors were obtained from the EIIP Tech. Report , Table 8.5-1 and are list ed below in Table 3.2.7-2.

Table 3.2.7-2 Per Employee Emission Fa ctors for Industrial Surface Coating
Subcategory Per Employee Factor (lb VOC/employee/yr) Furniture & Fixtures 944 Metal Containers 6,029 Automobile (new) 794 Machinery & Equipment 77 Appliances 463 Other Transportation Equipment 35 Sheet, strip & Coil 2,877 Factory Finished Wood 131 Electrical Insulation 290 Marine Coatings 308

The EIIP Tech. Report also listed SIC codes for these industrial surface coating subcategories. As stated earlier, the SIC codes were replaced in 1997 with NAICS. The employment data was estimated using the method previously outlined in Subsection 3.2.1.

According to the EIIP Tech. Report the activity days per week is 5 days. The annual emissions for population and employment based emission f actors were calculated using equations 3.2.7-1 and 3.2.7-2, respectively.

EM = Population x EF 3.2.7-1 (2000 lb/ton)

# EM = Employees x EF 3.2.7-2 (2000 lb/ton)

where EM = emissions for source category EF = emission factor for source category

3.2.8 Asphalt Paving Two types of asphalt paving are used for road pa ving and repair; emulsified asphalt and cutback asphalt. Emulsified asphalt is a type of liquefied road surfacing material made from a blend of water with an emulsifier. Cutback asphalt is a ty pe of liquefied road surface that is prepared by blending or "cutting back" asphalt cement with various kinds of petroleum distillates. VOC emissions occur as the asphalt cures.

Cutback asphalt emissions are included in the asph alt paving category. Since the assembly of the final VISTAS 2002 inventory, it was found that the NCDOT specification for asphalt in 2002 was hot mix and emulsified asphalt with hot mi x but not cutback asphalt. Surrounding states have precluded the use of cu t back by statutory provision s; which has driven asphalt manufactures to discontinue cutback production throughout the region. The absence of the use of cutback has resulted in substantial reductions in emissions from asphalt paving operations in North Carolina. Cutback asphalt emissions are included in the 2002 invent ory, and 5.23 tons of VOC per year were emitted in 2002 in the PM2.5 nonattainment area. The 5.23 tons of VOC per year represents a relatively sma ll amount and does not significantl y affect the accuracy of the inventory.

Hot-mix is composed of high molecular weight organics with minimal vapor pressures; consequently, VOC emissions are negligible. Th e use of emulsified as phalt does result in VOC emissions; but the emissions are significantly less th an cutback. New formulations of emulsified asphalt, such as cationic, continue to result in reduced emissions. The use of emulsified asphalt is primarily for tack coating, which is a surface preparation for the hot-mix layer. The tonnage of hot-mix asphalt is accounted for by the NCDOT districts and not on a c ounty basis. District tonnage was allocated on a county basis by apporti oning county paved mileage as reported in the NCDOT 2000 Highway Summary Report. However, the amount of emulsified asphalt used is not tracked by the NCDOT in any useable way. As a consequence, the NCDOT provided the following methodology to pred ict emulsified usage:

Square Yd. of hot-mix = (Tons of Hot-mix) x (2000 lbs./Ton) 3.2.8-1

# (220 lbs/ Square Yd. of Hot-mix)

Gallons of Emulsified asphalt = (Sq. Yd. of hot-mix) x (0.08 gal./Sq. Yd. of hot-mix) 

# 3.2.8-2

The VOC emissions were calculat ed using the emissions factor for emulsified asphalt (9.2 lb VOC/barrel) and the number of gallons of emulsi fied asphalt per barrel (42 gal./barrel) from Table 17.5-2 of the EIIP Tech. Report

.
The emissions for the base year were calculated using equation 3.2.8-3.

EM = (gallons Emulsified Asphalt) x EF (42 gal/barrel) x (2000 lb/tons) 3.2.8-3

where EM = emissions for source category EF = emission factor for source category

3.2.9 Roofing Operations This category covers the installation and repair of asphalt roofs on commercial and industrial buildings. This category include s only hot-applied asphalt roofing, for which the only significant emissions source is the kettle used to heat the asphalt. The am ount of asphalt roofing activity is estimated by summing the number of felt, cap, and flashing squares used in North Carolina during the year 2002. This information wa s ascertained from the Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing Association. The amount of aspha lt used is given by the equation 3.2.9-1, which uses the default value of 20 lbs. of aspha lt / square found in the EIIP Tech. Report . The emissions by county, shown in equation 3.2.9-2, we re apportioned by roofing establishments in the county divided by the state to tal, using the number of esta blishments from NAISC code 23561 from the 2000 County Business Patterns. The 2000 County Business Patterns was the latest available data at the tim e of the inventory development.

Asphalt (Ton/yr) = (# squares) x (20 lbs. of asphalt/square) 3.2.9-1 (2000 lbs./ton)

Asphalt County 

# = (Tons Asphalt State 

# ) x (# Roofing Establishments) County 

# 3.2.9-2 (# Roofing Establishments) State

# Asphalt roofing activities are assumed to have uniform operations throughout the year with a 5- day work week per the EIIP Tech. Report . Additionally, the EIIP Tech. Report reported the emissions factor as 6.2 lbs. VOC/ton asphalt for roofing operations.

The emissions for the base year invent ory were calculated using equation 3.2.9-3.

EM = (tons Asphalt) x EF (2000 lb/tons) 3.2.9-3

where EM = emissions for source category EF = emission factor for source category

3.2.10 Pesticide Application Pesticides broadly include any substance used to kill or retard the growth of insects, rodents, fungi, weeds, or microorganisms. Formulations of organic pesticides are commonly made by combining synthetic materials with various petr oleum products. The petroleum products, or inert ingredients, act as a carrier of the active component and usuall y evaporate into the atmosphere.

Agricultural Pesticides

Agricultural pesticides are a pplied in various manners, which directly affect the possible emissions associated with the application, regard less of the amount of solvent contained in the pesticide. There are basically three types of pe sticide/herbicide application methods. One is the "incorporated" type, in which th e product is applied and immediatel y incorporated into the soil. It is expected that little if any evaporation of solvent o ccur in this type of application. The next type, "pre-emergence", is where the product is put on the ground immediat ely after the crop is planted. This provides a protectiv e layer. Some evaporation of solvent would be expected with this type of application. The largest emissions would occur from "over the top" application of pesticides. These pesticides are sprayed directly on the foliage to kill weeds or insects. This application would provide an opportunity for a great deal of solv ent to evaporate.

The overall pesticide usage associated with ag ricultural crop production continues to slowly decrease in North Carolina driven by conservativ e pest management practices and the cost of pesticides as reported by the Nort h Carolina Cooperative Extension office. The large majority of pesticide usage is confined to the production of tobacco and cotton crops. Because of the small crop size and high cash value, significant t obacco acreage is found in North Carolina.

# The planted crop acreage from the North Carolina Agricultural Statistic Division and crop profile reports prepared by the North Carolina Cooperati ve Extension office, and other university extension services, for the US De partment of Agriculture Pest Ma nagement Center were used to estimate agricultural pesticide usage. Crop acreage from the North Carolina Agricultural Statistic Division was obtained from http: //www.ncagr.com/stats/. Crop profile reports conducted by NCSU are based on surveys; where pa rticipation is reported to be as high as 90 percent for the more important cash crops. Crop profile reports for grains and soybeans do not exist for North Carolina, therefore data for thes e crops were obtained from other state profiles and from discussions with representatives of th e North Carolina Cooperative Extension office.

The individual crop profiles outline the current agri cultural pesticide practices, i.e. the pesticide agents (insecticides, herbicides, fungicides), th e percentage of acres treated, and the pounds of active ingredient pesticide applied per acre. The crop profiles often report the application of the active ingredient (pounds of active ingredient per acre) as a ra nge of values. For the worst case scenario, the highest reported va lue was used. The number of app lications of a single pesticide was usually one per year for all pesticides. The few exceptions to one application are more than accounted for by the conservative practice of usi ng the highest value of application rate.

The pounds of active ingredients for each crop were calculated by using equation 3.2.10-1 and an example calculation for soybeans follows. Table 3.2.10-1 presents the pestic ides associated with a particular crop, the % of treated acres, and the lbs. of active pesticide ingredient per year.

(lbs. AI/acre) CROP 

# = ∑ (% acres treated) x (lb AI/acre) PESTICIDE 

# 3.2.10-1

where AI = active ingredient.

For soybeans, the pounds of activ e ingredients for the crop is:

Pesticide % Acres Treated Lb AI/acre Paraquat 20 0.47 Glyphosate 10 4 Sulfusate 5 4 Carbaryl 10 1.5

(lbs. AI/acre) SOYBEAN 

# =(0.20 x 0.47) + (0.10 x 4) + (0.05 x 4) + (0.10 x 1.5) =0.844 lbs. AI/acre for soybeans

# Table 3.2.10-1 Agriculture Pesticides Application Rates
Crop/Agent % Acres Treated Lbs. active ingredient/Acre 

## Crop/Agent % Acres Treated Lbs. active ingredient/Acre 

## Soybeans Corn Silage Paraquat 20 0.47 Terbufos 35 1 Glyphosate 10 4 Chloropyrifus 10 1 Sulfusate 5 4 Phorate 10 1 Carbaryl 10 1.5 Ethoprop 5 1 Cotton Carbofuran 5 1 Tribufos 100 0.75 M Parathion 50 0.75 Aldicarb 91 0.75 Thiocarb 90 0.6 Prourgite 0.45 0.73 Methomyl 50 0.45 Dicofol 0.55 1.6 Corn Grain Dicrotophos 0.45 0.2 Terbufos 35 1 Acephate 2.1 0.5 Chloropyrifus 10 1 M-Parathion 1 0.5 Phorate 10 1 L-cyhalothrin 99 0.145 Ethoprop 5 1 Thiocarb 40 0.75 Carbofuran 5 1 Aldicarb 50 0.725 M Parathion 50 0.75 Tobacco Thiocarb 90 0.6 Acephate 70 1.5 Methomyl 50 0.45 Spinosad 13 0.05 Oats Methomyl 11 0.45 M Parathion 5 0.5 Endosulfan 7 1 Wheat Imidacoloprid 62 0.03 M Parathion 5 0.5 Chloropicrin 41 79.8 Sweet Potatoes Dichloropropene 35 89.5 Napropamide 50 1.5 Clomazone 75 1 Clomazone 25 0.87 Metalaxyl 49 0.76 Fluazifop 20 0.17 Barley Carbaryl 25 0.67 M Parathion 0.8 0.5 Peanuts Irish Potatoes Chlorpyrifus 60 1 Phorate 3 40 1.20 Disulfoton 90 0.75 Glyphosate 6 5 Esfenvalerate 25 0.03 Metolachor 8 2 Folicur 1 51 0.51 Metribuzin 55 0.5 Vernolate 45 2.5 Sorghum Dichloropropene 0.16 80 MethyParathion 1 0.75 Chlorpyrifus 1 1 Carbaryl 1 2

# The emission factors for each crop were calculated utilizing information from the EIIP Tech. Report , p 9.5-4, which relates active ingredients to VOC emissions. According to the EIIP Tech. Report , for every pound of active ingredient there are 2.45 pounds of VOC, of this 90% is evaporated. The emission factors for each crop we re calculated using Equation 3.2.10-2, with an example calculation for soybean following.

EF CROP 

# = (lb AI CROP 

# /acre) x (2.45 lb. VOC/l b. of AI) x (0.90) 3.2.10-2

Where EF CROP 

# = Emission factor in lbs. VOC/ active ingredient for each crop AI CROP 

# = Active ingredient for each crop

For soybeans the emission factor is: Lbs. AI/acre for soybean = 0.844 lbs. AI/acre

EF SOYBEAN 

# = (0.844 lb active ingredient/acre) x (2.45 lb VOC/active ingredient) x (0.90) = 1.861 lbs. VOC/acre

An exception to the above calculation was for th e usage of the pesticides: chloropicrin and 1,3 dichloropropene. These fumigants are widely us ed for treating tobacco beds for nematodes and constitute a major portion of the pesticide invent ory. They have a moderate vapor pressure of 18.3 and 34 millimeters of mercury (at 77 ° F), respectively, and their formulation is approximately 96% to 98% of th e active ingredient. In light of these properties, the VOC emissions are assumed to be equal to the a pplication per acre, wh ich are 79 pounds/acre for chloropicrin and 89.5 pounds/acre for 1,3 dichlo ropropene. Table 3.2.10-2 list the pounds of active ingredients per acre and the calc ulated emission factor for each crop.

# Table 3.2.10-2 Emission Fa ctors by Crop Type
Crop Lbs. Active Ingredients/acre Lbs. VOC/Acre Soybeans 0.844 1.861 Cotton 2.267 4.999 Barley 0.004 0.009 Corn – Silage 1.79 3.947 Corn – Grain 1.79 3.947 Wheat 0.025 0.055 Oats 0.025 0.055 Sweet Potato 1.169 2.578 Tobacco - Non-fumigant 2.317 5.109 - Fumigant 64.043 64.043 Total Tobacco 69.152 Peanuts - Non-fumigant 2.9175 6.433 - Fumigant 0.128 0.282 Total Peanuts 6.715 Irish Potatoes 1.9350 4.267 Sorghum 0.0375 0.083

The emissions for 2002 were cal culated using equation 3.2.10-3.

EM a 

# = ( ∑ (CROP) a 

# x EF CROP 

# ) (2000 lb/tons) 3.2.10-3

where EM a 

# = emissions for source category in county (a) CROP = acres of specific crop in county (a) EF CROP 

# = emission factor for specific crop

Nonagricultural Pesticide

Nonagricultural pesticide applicat ions are considered as part of the commercial/consumer solvent use emission factor and no longer a separate sub category. Please refer to the next section.

# 3.2.11 Commercial/Consumer Solvent Use This category includes only non-industrial solven ts that are used in commercial or consumer applications. The solvent containing products co nsist of a diverse group ing, e.g. personal care products, household products, automotive aftermarket products , adhesives and sealants, pesticides, some coatings, and other commercia l and consumer products that may emit VOC emissions.

There are seven categories. They are named and their emission factors listed in Table 3.2.11-1 below.

Table 3.2.11-1 Misc. Non-Industrial Co nsumer-Commercial Em ission Factors Subcategory lb VOC/yr/person. lb NH 3 

# /yr/person. All Coatings and Related Products 0.95 - All FIFRA Related Products 1.78 - Miscellaneous Products (Not Otherwise Covered) 0.07 -

Personal Care Products 2.32 - Household Products 0.079 0.031 Automotive Aftermarket Products 1.36 - Adhesives and Sealants 0.57 -

VOC emissions for this category is estimated by using nationally based per capita emissions factors. The county population values are used to estimate the emissions from this source category.

According to the EIIP Tech. Report , emissions from this source category occur 365 days per year. The emissions for the base year i nventory were calculate d using equation 3.2.11-1.

EM = (Population 2002 

# ) x EF (2000 lb/tons) 3.2.11-1

where EM = emissions for source category, tons per year EF = emission factor for source category

# 3.3 BIOPROCESS EMISSION SOURCES

Bioprocess emission sources include those sour ces whose emissions result from biological processes (e.g., fermentations). Source categor ies include bakeries, br eweries, wineries and distilleries.

3.3.1 Bakeries Ethanol, a VOC, is a by-product of fermentati on of bread dough. The ethanol emissions from large commercial bakeries are accounted for as point sources; however, ethanol emissions occur from grocery store bakery departments and sma ll business bakeries not accounted for under the point source inventory.

The EIIP Tech. Report prescribes accounting for these emissions by the use of a per capita consumption factor of 70 pounds of bread per pe rson per year and an emission factor of 0.5 pounds of VOC per 1000 pounds of baked bread. The county populations obtained from the North Carolina Office of State Budget and Manage ment were used to estimate the emissions from this source category.

According to the EIIP Tech. Report , emissions from this source category occur 365 days per year. The emissions for the base year i nventory were calculate d using equation 3.3.1-1.

EM = (Population) b 

# x CF x EF (2000 lb/tons) 3.3.1-1

where EM = emissions for source category Population b 

# = Population in base year CF = Consumption factor , 70 lb bread/person/year EF = emission factor for source categ ory, 0.5 lb VOC/1000 lb bread baked

3.4 OTHER MAN MADE AREA SOURCES

Other man made area sources include forest fi res, slash burning and prescribed burning, agricultural burning, st ructure fires, and orchard heaters. The methodology used to calculate the emissions from these sources are descri bed in detail in each subsection.

# 3.4.1 Structure Fires Burning fires can produce short term emissions of organic compounds and nitrogen oxides (NOx). The U.S. Fire Administration (USFA ) of the Department of Homeland Security maintains statistics on the number of fires per county. The numb er of fires per county for 2002 was derived from 2001 and 2002 population statistics and 2001 USFA fire st atistics. The USFA fire statistics were obtained fr om the USFA website at http:/ /www.usfa.fema.gov/safety/. As 2002 fire statistics were not available, a fires per person factor for 2001 was calculated and found to be equal to 0.00184 fires/person. The 2001 count y population values were obtained from the North Carolina State Demographi cs website at http://demog.sta te.nc.us/. The 2001 population values were the latest data available. The 0.00184 fires per person was applied to the 2002 population for each county to determine the number of fires in each county for 2002.

The emission factors and fuel loading factor s were obtained from the EIIP Tech. Report
, Table 18.4-1 and Table 18.4-2, respectively. The emission factors are 11 pounds of VOC per ton burned, 1.4 pounds of NOx per ton burned, 10.8 pounds of PM 10 

# per ton burned, and 10.8 pou/pnds PM 2.5 

# per tons burned. The loading factor is 1.15 tons of material bu rned per structural fire.

According to the EIIP Tech. Report , emissions from this source category occur 365 days per
year.

The emissions for the base year 2002 invent ory were calculated using Equation 3.4.1-1.

EM P 

# = (2002 County population) x (FPP) x (CF) x (EF P 

# ) (2000 lb/tons) 3.4.1-1

where EM P 

# = emissions for structure fires for pollutant (P) FPP = fires per person in 2001, 0.00184 fires/person CF = Conversion factor, 1.15 tons burned/structure fire EF P 

# = emission factor for pollutant (P)

3.4.2 Charbroiling The commercial charbroiling of ground beef emits VOC emissions. According to the methodology in the EIIP Tech. Report , county Health Departments s hould be able to provide the number of restaurants in a count y as well as the percentage of those restaurants that charbroil meat. The NCDAQ was able to as certain the number of restaura nts in each county in 2002 from the North Carolina Division of Environmental Se rvices, Inspection, Statistics, and Fee Branch.

# To determine the percentage of charbroiling re staurants, the county Health Departments of several counties were surveyed.

According to the EIIP Tech. Report , the average throughput of meat per restaurant with a charbroiler is 1160 pounds per week and the em issions factor is 3.94 pounds of VOC per 1000 pounds of meat. Emissions from this s ource category occur 365 days per year.

The emissions for the base year inventor y were calculated using Equations 3.4.2-1.

EM a 

# = (# Restaurants) x (% Ch arbroiling) x (CF) x (EF) (2000 lb/tons) x (1 yr/52 wks) 3.4.2-1

where EM a 

# = emissions for source categor y in county (a), tons/yr CF = conversion factor, 1160 lb meat charbroiled/week EF = emission factor, lbs. pollut ant/1000 lb meat charbroiled

3.4.3 Open Burning – Municipal Solid Waste and Yard Trimmings

This subsection describes the combined emission inventory methodology for source classification code (SCC) 2610030000 Residentia l Open Burning – Household and SCC 2610000100 Open Burning – Yard Trimmings. Open burning is treated as a means of waste disposal in rural areas. Mate rials burned generally include agricultural refuse, landscaping refuse, or scrap wood. Local authorities could not provide assistance with estimating the tons of refuse burned or the amount burned. According to local authorities, burn ing permits are issued year round without requiring a notation for the amount burned.

It was assumed that all municipal solid waste (MSW) and yard trimmings, were burned in the open for solid waste generated outside the munici pal corporate limits. According to the EIIP Tech. Report , Table 16.5-1, it is estimated that 3.77 pounds of MSW is genera ted per person per day and 0.64 pounds of yard trimmings are generated per person per day. Since it is illegal to burn within the corporate limits, the rural population was estimated by using the same percentage of rural population in each county as what wa s reported in the 2000 census. The 2000 total and rural populations for each county were obtained fr om the North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management, State Data Center. The 2000 to tal and rural populations was the latest data available.

VOC, NOx, CO, SO 2 

# , and NH 3 

# emission factors for open burni ng of MSW were obtained from EIIP Tech. Report , Table 16.4-1, Open Burning of Municipa l Refuse. The emission factors are

# 6.676 pounds VOC per ton MSW burned, 6 pounds NOx per ton MSW burned, 1 pounds SO 2 

# per ton MSW burned, and 6.0 E-07 pounds NH 3 

# per ton MSW burned.

The VOC emission factor for open burning of yard trimmings was obtained from EIIP Chapter 16, Table 16.4-7. The factor is 28 pounds VOC per ton yard trimmings. Th e rural percent of the populations for the statewide counties were obt ained from the 2000 census data. Since burning permits are issued year round, the activity days per year was 365. These values were used to calculate the tons per year emissions for the ba se year. The emissions from the burning of MSW for the base year 2002 inventory were calculate d using equation 3.4.3-1. The emissions from the burning of yard trimmings for the base year 2002 inventory were calculated using equation 3.4.3-2.

EM P,MSW 

# = (Rural Population in 2002) x (CF MSW 

# ) x (EF P 

# ) x (365 days/yr) (2000 lb/tons) 3.4.3-1

EM P,YT 

# = (Rural Population in 2002) x (CF YT 

# ) x (EF P 

# ) x (365 days/yr) (2000 lb/tons) 3.4.3-2

where EM P,MSW 

# = emissions from burning MSW for pollutant (P) EM P,YT 

# = emissions from burning yard trimmings for pollutant (P) CF MSW 

# = conversion factor, 3.77 lb MSW/person/day = 0.001885 ton MSW/person/day CF YT 

# = conversion factor, 0.64 lb yard trimmings/person/day = 0.00032 ton yard trimmings/person/day EF P 

# = emission factor for pollutant (P)

3.4.4 Small Stationary Source Fossil Fuel Use In general, fossil fuels are burned for space and ho t water heating. This source category covers VOC, NO x 

# , SO 2 

# , PM 10 

# , PM 2.5 

# , and NH 3 

# emissions from natural gas (NG) and liquid petroleum gas (LPG), oil, coal, and wood combustion in th e residential, commercia l/institutional (called commercial), and industrial sectors.

The “demand for energy” for these fuel types is know n as fuel usage. Fuel usage data for North Carolina was taken from NC Energy Outlook 2003 by Global Insight, Inc for the base year 2002. The following table shows the data used.

# Table 3.4.4-1 Fuel Use in North Carolina 2002 Fuel Units Residential Commercial Industrial NG 10 6 

# ft 3 

# 64,014 40,580 95,718 LPG gallons 282,775,596 47,960,199 198,606,965 Oil gallons 215,804,019 113,088,933 343,414,390 Coal tons 46,872 85,735 0 Wood tons 1,625,111 164,327 8,583,778

Emission factors used are shown in Table 3.4.4-2 below.

# Table 3.4.4-2 Combustion Emission FactorsNH32000.00121.80.4900.0080.030.0863.200.0080.030.086PM2.57.60.009060.0014013.807.60.0009750.0027624.759885.477.60.001250.003969464.759885.47PM107.60.0090606.234.67.60.009060.0044912.95756.487.60.0011250.0057628812.95756.48SO20.60.0000540.0042631.620.40.60.00005130.00461638.760.375480.60.00005130.004627538.760.37548NOx940.0140.0189.12.6167.50.01450.03715.83.304224163.330.020.03914.93.304224VOC5.50.00030.0007130.07229.05.50.000350.0007350.070.2553264.960.000350.000240.070.255326Unitslb/106ft3Lb/galLb/galLb/tonLb/tonlb/106ft3Lb/galLb/galLb/tonLb/tonlb/106ft3Lb/galLb/galLb/tonLb/tonFuelNGLPGOilCoalWoodNGLPGOilCoalWoodNGLPGOilCoalWoodSectorResidentialResidentialResidentialResidentialResidentialCommercialCommercialCommercialCommercialCommercialIndustrialIndustrialIndustrialIndustrialIndustrial

# 3.4.4.1 Fuel Oil Combustion Fuel oil consumption covers the use of kerosene, di stillate oil and residual oil. Distillate oil includes fuel oil grades 1, 2, and 4; residual oil includes fuel grades 5 and 6. In most areas, residual oil is not used by residential sources. Ke rosene and distillate oils are primarily used for space heating in domestic and small commercial build ings, while residual oils are used primarily for industrial and large commercial applications. It was assumed that residential fuel oils are normally used only for heating and therefore, no residential fuel oil emissions were calculated for summer months.

The base year statewide annual fuel oil de mand for energy, obtained from the NC Energy Outlook 2003 , was converted British Thermal Units (BTU s) to gallons of fuel used for each heating classification (i.e ., residential, commercial, and indust rial). The conversion factors used were obtained from the NC Energy Outlook 2003 and are 135,000 BTU per gallon of kerosene, 138,690 BTU per gallon of distillate oil, a nd 149,690 BTU per gallon of residual oil.

Once converted to gallons of fuel, the statewid e fuel use was then apportioned to the county level. This was accomplished by multiplying the num ber of gallons of fuel used in the state by the fraction of housing units heated by fuel oils in the county compared to that of the whole state (see the equation below).

# gal. fuel for County X = (# gal. fuel oil for State) x (# housing units heated by fuel oil in County X) (# housing units heated by fuel oil in State)



# The fraction of housing units was used to distribu te the fuel on a county le vel for the residential heating classifications. The numbe r of housing units heated by fuel oils was obtained from the 2000 Census.

Commercial and industrial fuel usage was apportioned according to the number of business establishments in the State and counties. The numbers were take n from 1997 (last year of SIC based statistics) County Business Patterns . Establishments with SICs from 50 xx through 99 xx were summed. Industrial sources were calcula ted in a manner similar to commercial sources burning oil or coal.

Emission factors were obtained from AP-42, Tabl e 1.3-1 and from AP-42, Table 1.3-3. Fuel oil combustion emission factors are listed in Table 3.4.4-2, as shown above.

# According to the Procedures document, Table 5.8-1, the activity days per week is 7 for residential heating and 6 for commercial and industrial heat ing. These values were used to calculate the emissions in tons per year for the base year.

Point source emissions with SCC 1-03-004-xx a nd 1-03-005-xx identifie d commercial residual oil and distillate oil emissions , respectively; while source emissions with SCC 1-02-004-xx and 1-02-005-xx identified industrial residual and di stillate oil emissions, respectively. The point source emissions in tons per year were subtracted from the area source emissions.

3.4.4.2 Coal Combustion There are three types of coal used for space heating: anthracite, bituminous and lignite. According to AP-42, anthracite, or hard coal, is mined almost exclusively in Pennsylvania and is consumed in Pennsylvania and in states that are within easy shipping distance. In addition, lignite coal is mined in North Dakota and Texas a nd is consumed near where it mined. Since the incidence of anthracite and lignite coal burning is low in North Carolina, the emissions from coal combustion were calculated utilizing only th e emission factors for bituminous coal.

It was assumed that residential coal is nor mally used only for heating and therefore, no residential coal emissions were calculated for summer months.

The base year statewide annual coal demand for energy, obtained from the NC Energy Outlook 2003 , were converted from BTU to tons of coal used for each heating classification (i.e., residential, commercial, and industrial). The conversion factor used was 21,100,000 BTU per ton of coal.

Once converted to tons of coal, the statewide coal use was then apportioned to the county level. This was calculated by multiplying the number of tons of coal used in the state by the fraction of housing units heated by coal in the county, compared to that of the whole state (see the equation below).

# ton of coal for County X = (# ton of coal for State) x (# housing units heated by coal in County X) (# housing units heated by coal in State)



# The fraction of housing units was used to distribu te the coal on a county level for both heating classifications. The number of housing units he ated by coal was obtained from the Federal Bureau of the Census and the 2003 NC State Energy Plan (http://www.doa.state.nc.us/doa/energy).

# There were several emission factors for b ituminous coal combustion listed in AP-42, Table 1.1-3. For the purpose of estimating the em issions from coal combustion, the equipment listed in AP-42, Table 1.1-3 were grouped in to industrial, commercial/institutional and residential type equipment. The emission factor s were averaged for each type and the averaged emission factors were used to calculate the emissions. Table 3.4.4-2 shown above lists the averaged emission factors used in the calculati ons. It should be noted that fluidized bed combustors (FBC) were not included in the averaged emission factors because FBC does not constitute a significant percentage of the total boiler population, according to AP-42, Section 1.1. The Procedures document, Table 5.8-1, lists the activity days per week as 7 for residential heating and 6 for commercial a nd industrial heating. Point source emissions with SCC 1-03- 002-xxidentified commercial coal combustion emissions. The point source annual emissions in tons per year were subtracted from the area source emissions.

Residential Coal Combustion Emissions:

Pollutant emitted by = (# tons/year Coal) x EF coal combustion (2000 pounds/ton)

Commercial Coal Combustion Emissions:

Pollutant emitted by = (# tons/year Coal) x EF coal combustion (2000 pounds/ton)

Industrial Coal Combustion Emissions:

There is no industrial coal combustion in the area source inventory becaus e it is included in the point source emissions inventory.

3.4.4.3 Natural Gas Combustion Currently in the United States, natural gas is one of the major types of fuels used for heating. It is mainly used for industrial process stream and heat production, comme rcial and residential space heating and for electric power generati on. Although natural gas is a relatively clean burning fuel, some emissions can result from its combustion.

The base year statewide annual demand for natu ral gas energy, obtained from the NC Energy Outlook 2003 , was converted from BTU to 10 6 

# cubic feet of natural gas used for each heating classification (i.e., residential, commercial, an d industrial). The conve rsion factor used was 1,000 BTU per cubic foot of natural gas.

# Once converted to cubic feet of natural gas, the statewide natural gas use was then apportioned to the county level. This was calculated by multiplying the number of cubic feet of natural gas used in the state by the fraction of housing units heated by natural gas in the county, in comparison to the state (see the equation below).

# ft 3 

## nat gas for County X = (# ft 3 

## nat gas for State) x (# housing units heated by nat gas in County X) (# housing units heated by nat gas in State)



# The fraction of housing units was used to distri bute the natural gas usage on a county level for each heating classification. The number of housi ng units heated by natural gas was obtained from the 2000 Census.

The North Carolina Utilities Commission provide d data from the U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration giving monthl y usage of natural gas by residential and commercial customers in North Carolina for 2002.

There were several emission factors listed for indu strial and commercial natural gas boilers in AP-42, Table 1.4-1. For the purpose of estimati ng the emissions from natural gas combustion, an average of the emission factors were us ed. Table 3.4.4-2 shown above lists averaged emission factors used in the calculat ions. According to the Procedures document, Table 5.8-1, the activity days per week is 7 for residential heating and 6 for commercial and industrial heating. These values were used to calculate the annual emissions in tons per year for the base
year.

Point source emissions with SCC 1-03-006-xxx and 1-02-006-xxx, identified commercial and industrial natural gas co mbustion emissions, respectively. Wh ere point source emissions were indicated, these were deducted from the 2002 annual emission estimates.

Residential Natural Gas Combustion Emissions :

Pollutant emitted by = (# ft 3 

# /year natural gas) x EF Nat. gas combustion (2000 pounds/ton)

Commercial Natural Ga s Combustion Emissions:

Pollutant emitted by = (# ft 3 

# /year natural gas) x EF Nat. gas combustion (2000 pounds/ton)

Industrial Natural Gas Combustion Emissions:

# Pollutant emitted by = (# ft 3 

# /year natural gas) x EF Nat. gas combustion (2000 pounds/ton)

3.4.4.4 Liquefied Petroleum Gas Combustion Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) consists of pr opane, propylene, butane, and butylenes. The largest market for LPG is the domestic/commerc ial market, followed by the chemical industry and agricultural markets. LPG is also used as a stand-by fuel for facilities that have natural gas service contracts that can be in terrupted. The form of LPG used primarily for domestic heating is propane. Liquefied petroleum gas is consid ered a clean fuel because it does not produce visible emissions. However, ga seous pollutants such as VOC, NO x 

# , SO 2 

# , PM 10 

# , and PM 2.5 

# do

occur.

The base year statewide annual LPG demand fo r energy, obtained from the NC Energy Outlook 2003 , was converted from BTU to 10 3 

# gallons of LPG used for each heating classification (i.e., residential, commercial, and industrial). The conversion fa ctor was 95,475 BTU per gallon of LPG.

Once converted to gallons of LPG, the statew ide LPG use was then apportioned to the county level. This was accomplished by multiplying the num ber of gallons of LPG used in the state by the fraction of housing units heated by LPG in th e county compared to th at of the whole state (see the equation below).

# gal LPG for County X = (# gal LPG for State) x (# housing units heated by LPG in County X) (# housing units heated by LPG in State)



# The fraction of housing units was used to dist ribute the LPG usage on a county level for each heating classification. The number of housing un its heated by LPG was obtained from the 2000 Census.

The North Carolina Utilities Commission provide d data from the U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration giving monthly usage of LPG by residential and commercial customers in North Carolina for 2002.

The emission factors listed in AP-42, Table 1.5-1 were averaged for industrial and commercial sources. There is no residential LPG emission factor listed in AP-42. Since the form of LPG used primarily for domestic heating is propane , the commercial propane emission factor was used for residential LPG combustion. The emission factors listed in AP-42, as well as the

# average emission factors used for estimating the emissions from LPG combustion are listed in Table 3.4.4.4-1. Accordi ng to the Procedures document, Table 5.8-1, the activity days per week is 7 for residential heating and 6 for commercial and industrial heating. Point source emissions with SCC 1-03-010-xxx and 1-02-010-xxx, identi fied commercial and industrial LPG combustion emissions, respectively. Where point source emissions were indicated, these were deducted from the 2002 annual emission estimate.

Residential LPG Emissions:

Pollutant emitted by = (# gal/year LPG) x EF 

# LPG combustion (2000 pounds/ton)

Commercial LPG Co mbustion Emissions:

Pollutant emitted by = (# gal/year LPG) x EF LPG combustion (2000 pounds/ton)



# Industrial LPG Combustion Emissions:

Pollutant emitted by = (# gal/year LPG) x EF LPG combustion (2000 pounds/ton)



# Table 3.4.4.4-1 Emission Factors for Liquefied Petroleum Gas
Application/Fuel Type Emission Factors (lb /gallon)
Industrial Commercial Residential
Butane 0.0036 0.0021 - Propane 0.0032 0.0019 0.0019 Averaged CO Emission Factor 0.0034 0.002 0.002 Butane 0.021 0.015 0.015 Propane 0.019 0.014 0.014 Averaged NOx Emission Factor 0.02 0.0145 0.014 Butane 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 Propane 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 Averaged VOC Emission Factor 0.00035 0.00035 0.0003 Butane - - - Propane - - - Averaged SO 2 

# Emission Factor 0.0000513 0.0000513 0.000054 Butane - - -

# Propane - - - Averaged PM 10 

# Emission Factor 0.001125 0.00906 0.00906 Butane - - - Propane - - - Averaged PM 2.5 

# Emission Factor 0.001125 0.00906 0.00906

3.4.4.5 Wood Combustion

The use of wood as a source of heat occurs in the residential and industrial sectors. It was assumed that residential wood is normally used only for heating and therefore, no residential wood emissions were calculated for summer mont hs. The burning of wood waste in boilers is mostly confined to those industr ies where the wood is available as a byproduct. Most often this is in the lumber, furniture and plywood industries. These types of industries are included in the point source inventory, therefore, no area source emissions will be calculated for industrial wood combustion. Wood stoves, commonly used in reside nces as space heaters, are used both as the primary source of heat and as a suppleme nt to conventional heating systems.

The base year statewide annual wood demand for energy, obtained from the NC Energy Outlook 2003 , was converted from BTU to tons of wood used for reside ntial heating. The conversion factor was 4,500 BTU per pound of wood, which is the mid-point of the range (4,000 to 5,000 BTU per pound of wood) given in AP-42, Section 1.6.

Once converted to tons of wood, the statewid e wood use was then apportioned to the county level. This was accomplished by multiplying the num ber of tons of wood use in the state by the fraction of housing units heated by wood in the c ounty compared to that of the whole state (see the equation below).

# tons Wood for County X = (# ton Wood for State) x (# housing units heated by Wood in County X) (# housing units heated by Wood in State)



# The fraction of housing units was used to distribute the wood usage on a county level. The number of housing units heated by wood was obtained from the 2000 Census.

Table 3.4.4-2 shown above lists emission factors used in the calculations. The residential wood combustion emission factors were obtained from the Table 2.4-1 of the EIIP Tech. Report
, Volume III, Chapter II. According to the Procedures document, Table 5.8-1, the activity days per week is 7 for re sidential heating.

# Wood Combustion Emissions:

Pollutant emitted by = (# ton/year Wood) x EF Wood combustion (2000 pounds/ton)



# 3.4.4.6 Small Electric Utility Boilers This source subcategory has been treated as a point source since the information was available for each facility. Refer to the point source cate gory discussion in Appendix F.1 for further details.

3.4.5 Vehicle Fires

Vehicle fire emissions within the State demonstration area are estimated by considering the estimated number vehicles burned in the State, th e amount of material burned (the fuel loading) in a vehicle fire, and the emission factors for th e open burning of automobile components. The assumptions for amount of material burned and the emission factors were based on the USEPA’s AP-42 , Section 2.5 Open Burning.

The estimated number of vehicle fires was determ ined by apportioning a nati onal fire statistic to a county level. The USFA of the Department of Homeland Security maintains national-level fire statistics. The number of fires nationwide in 2002 was 1,734,500 and was available from the USFA website at http://www.usfa .fema.gov/statistics/national/. Th e percentage of vehicle fires was applied to the national-level total number of fires. The number of national-level vehicle fires was then apportioned to a state-level. Th e ratio of North Carolina vehicle miles traveled (VMT) to U.S. VMT (92,894,000,000 VMT / 2,855,756,000,000 VMT) was applied to the number of national-level vehicle fires to obtain the number of North Carolina vehicle fires. The VMT statistics were obtained from the U.S. De partment of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration website at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs02/vm2.htm. The number of state-level vehicle fires was then apportioned to a county level based on paved mile per county in 2002. Paved mile per county data was obtained from the NCDOT. Using the above method, 2002 vehicle fire emissions were calculated.

The amount of vehicle material burned (the fuel loading) in a vehicl e fire was estimated by assuming that an average vehicle has 500 pounds of components (0.25 tons ) that can burn in a fire, based on a 3,700 pounds average vehicle weight (CARB, 1995).

# The emission factors were obtained from Table 2.5-1, Emission Factors for Open Burning of Municipal Refuse, of the USEPA’s AP-42 , Section 2.5 Open Burning. The emission factors are 32 pounds of VOC per ton burned and 4 pounds of NOx per ton burned.

The emissions for the base inventory were calculated using equation 3.4.5-1.

EM P 

# = (# of Vehicle Fires pe r year) x (CF) x (EF P 

# ) (2000 lb/tons) 3.4.5-1

where EM P 

# = annual emissions for structur e fires for pollutant (P) CF = Conversion factor, 0.25 tons burned/vehicle fire EF P 

# = emission factor for pollutant (P)

3.4.6 Agricultural Burning This source subcategory covers bur ning practices used to clear a nd/or prepare land for planting. These operations include stubble burning, burning of agricultural crop residues, and the burning of stand field crops as part of harvesting (e .g., sugar cane). According to the North Carolina Department of Agriculture, when soybeans are double cropped with wheat , the wheat stubble is usually burned back after harves t about one fourth of the time. According to Dr. J. Dunphy, a soybean specialist at North Ca rolina State Universit y, the acres of soybean double cropped with wheat in North Carolina is approx imately equal to the acres of wheat planted. Therefore, one fourth of the acreage of wheat planted in 2002 was used to calculate the emissions from agricultural burning practic es in North Carolina.

The fuel loading factor and the yield of VO C for burning wheat stubble was obtained from AP-42 , Table 2.5.5. The fuel loading factor is 1.9 t ons of fuel consumed per acre burned. The yield of pollutant was dependent upon whether the field was head-fire burned or back-fire burned. The percentage of each burning type used was not available, therefore, the assumption was made that each type was used 50 percent of the time. The yield of VOC used, 11 pounds of VOC per ton of fuel consumed, is an average of the two types of burning. To calculate the emission factor for VOC emissions, the fuel loading factor is multiplied by the yield of pollutant.

EF VOC 

# = (1.9 tons/acre) (11 lb VOC/ton burned) = 20.9 lb VOC/acre burned

# The annual emissions were calculated using the number of acres burned and the per acre emission factor. According to the North Carolina Department of Agriculture, field burning occurs only during June and July.

The number of acres of wheat planted was obtained from the North Carolina Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Statis tics Division. The emissions fo r the 2002 base year inventory were calculated us ing equation 3.4.6-1.

EM = (1⁄4 x (wheat acreage)) x EF (2000 lb/ton) 3.4.6-1

where EM = emissions for source category for VOC EF = emission factor for VOC

3.4.7 On Site Incineration

On-site incineration is the confin ed burning of waste leaves, landscap e refuse and other refuse or rubbish. In North Carolina, comm ercial/institutional and industrial incinerators are required to have an Air Quality Permit in order to operate . Therefore, all indus trial incinerators are identified in the point source inventory. There may be small commercial/institutional incinerators that have not been identified in the point source inventory and as a result emissions were calculated for commercial on-site incinerators.

No data was available to determine the amount of waste burned in on- site incinerators. Therefore, the amount of solid waste burned was es timated with the fuel loading factor (L) given in Table 4.6-1 of the Procedures document. The commercial fuel loading factor is 23 tons of refuse/1,000 population/year. The yield for comm ercial incineration was obtained from several sources. The yield of NOx, SO 2 

# , PM 10 

# , PM 2.5 

# (P) was obtained from AP-42 , Table 2.1-12 and are listed in Table 2.1.4.7-1. Th e yield value used of NOx, SO 2 

# , PM 10 

# , and PM 2.5 

# was the average of the yield values listed in AP-42 . The yield of VOC is 8.556 lb/ton of refuse and was obtained from EIIP Technical Report , Open Burning, Table 16.4-1. The yield of NH 3 

# is 1.19 lb/ton of refuse and was obtained from EIIP Area Source Methods Document, “Estimating Emissions from Anthropogenic Nonagricultural Sources”.

# Table 3.4.7-1 Yield of Pollutant Values for Uncontrolled Refuse Combustors

Pollutant Multiple Chamber Combustor Yield Value Single Chamber Combustor Yield Value Average Yield Value (lb Pollutant/ton refuse burned) (lb Pollutant/ton refuse burned) (lb Pollutant/ton refuse burned) (lb Pollutant/ton refuse burned)

NOx 3 2 2.5

CO 10 20 15

SO 2 

# 2.5 2.5 2.5

PM 10 

# 7 15 11

PM 2.5 

# 7 15 11

To calculate the per capita polluta nt emission factor (EF) for on-si te commercial incinerators, the fuel loading factor was multiplied by the yiel d of the pollutant, as shown in the following equation.

EF P 

## = L COMMERCIAL 

## x P INCINERATION



# = (23 tons of refuse/1000 population/year) x (2.5 lb NOx/ton of refuse burned)

= 57.5 lb NOx/1000 population/year



# The emissions from commercial on-site incine ration for the base year 2002 inventory were calculated using equation 3.4.7-1.

EM P 

# = (Rural Population in 2002) x (EF P 

# ) (2000 lb/tons) 3.4.7-1

where EM P 

# = emissions from on-site incine ration for pollutant (P) in tons/year EF P 

# = emission factor for pollutant (P)

The population was obtained from the 2000 census data. The 2000 census data was the latest data available. According to the Procedures document, on-site incineration occurs uniformly year round and operates 7 days per week. Point source emissions with SCC 5-xx-xxx-xx

# identified waste incineration emissions. The point source emissions in tons per year were subtracted from the area source emissions.

# 4. VISTAS DEVELOPED 2002 AREA SOURCE INVENTORY

Section 4.0 details the portion of the 2002 base y ear area source inventory, which was developed for VISTAS/ASIP by the VISTAS contractor, MA CTEC, Inc. This information was obtained from the report entitled Documentation of the Base G 2002 Base Year, 2009, and 2018, Emission Inventories for VISTAS prepared for VISTAS by MACTEC, Inc. This report is included in Appendix P.

Several major components of the area source sect or of the inventory, which were developed by VISTAS, are discussed in Sections 4.1 through 4.5. Ammonia emissions from livestock and fertilizer sources are discussed in Section 4.1. PM 2.5 

# and PM 10 

# emissions from paved and unpaved roads are discussed in Section 4.2. Stag e II emissions are discussed in Section 4.3 and were removed from the area source inventory and in cluded in the mobile sect or of the inventory. Also, emissions from portable fuel containers were added and are discussed in Section 4.4. Section 4.5 describes the development of the fi res emissions inventory and distinguishes the difference between an actual versus typi cal inventory with regards to fires.

The following Sections are based on excerpt s, with some editing, taken from a document entitled, Documentation of the Base G 2002 Base Year, 2009 and 2018 Emission Inventories for VISTAS and prepared by MACTEC, Inc.

4.1 Ammonia from Agricultural Sources

VISTAS used version 3.6 of the Ca rnegie Mellon University (CMU) NH 3 

# model ( http://www.cmu.edu/ammonia/ ) to calculate NH 3 

# emission estimates for livestock and fertilizers. Results from this model were us ed for all VISTAS States. The CMU model version 3.6 was used in large part because it had been ju st recently been updated to include the latest (2002) Census of Agriculture animal population statistics.

For the ammonia inventory, VISTAS removed all wildlife and human perspiration emissions due to uncertainty of inaccurate emission factors. Th us all emissions from these two categories were deleted in the 2002 inventory.

4.2 Paved and Unpaved Road Emissions

VISTAS used the most recent PM emission estimates developed by EPA as part of the NEI development effort (Roy Huntley, U.S. EP A, email communication, 8/30/2004). EPA had

# developed and used an improved methodology fo r estimating paved road emissions for 2002. MACTEC obtained those emissions in March 2004 in NIF format from the EPA FTP site.

PM 2.5 

# emissions from several fugitive dust sour ces were also updated for the 2002 inventory. The Western Regional Air Part nership (WRAP) and U.S. EP A had been investigating overestimation of the PM 2.5 

# / PM 10 

# ratio in several fugitive dus t. Based on data received from U.S. EPA, VISTAS decided to revise the PM 2.5 

# emissions from construction, paved roads and unpaved road sources. PM 2.5 

# emissions in the emission inve ntory, which was developed by EPA were multiplied by 0.67, 0.6, and 0.67 for construction, paved roads and unpaved roads respectively to produce the values found in 2002 inventory. No changes were made to PM 10 

# , only to PM 2.5 

# .

4.3 Vehicle Refueling (Stage II) emissions

For the 2002 inventory, the VISTAS/ASIP States all agreed to remove the Stage II refueling emissions from the area source inventory and include them in the non-road a nd on-road sectors.

4.4 Portable Fuel Containers

Portable fuel containers (PFCs), SCC 2501060300, covers emissi ons from residential and commercial sector portable gaso line containers. Permeation, diur nal, transport, spillage, and vapor displacement emissions are typically accounted for in this category. Spillage from refueling operations and vapor displacement emissions were not included in the inventory to avoid double counting refueli ng in the non-road sector.

MACTEC found that the USEPA had prepared a national inventory of emissions by State for portable fuel containers. Data on emissions from this sour ce prepared by the USEPA were presented in the report, Estimating Emissions Associated with Portable Fuel Containers (PFCs), Draft Report , Office of Transportation and Air Qu ality, USEPA, Report # EPA420-D-06-003, February 2006.

The 2002 county-level emission estimates were obtained through an allocation method based on fuel usage. Initially, 2005 emission estimat es, except those from vapor displacement and spillage from refueling operations , were obtained from the USEP A’s report and assumed to be equal to 2002 values. Permeation, diurnal, and transport emission estimates were summed and allocated to the county-level, based on the fuel usage information obtained from the NONROAD2005 model. The SCCs that use contai ners for refueling were acquired from the

# spillage file of the NONROAD model. Then the fuel usages by county from the NONROAD 2005 runs prepared for VISTAS/ASIP were summ ed for those SCCs by county. The county level fuel use was then divided by the State total fuel use for the same SCCs to determine the fraction of total State fuel usage and that fraction was us ed to allocate the State-level emissions to the county.

4.5 Fires Including Forest Fires

The fires source category includes wildfire, prescribed burning, and land clearing fires. These fires can be intermittent in nature, but many of th ese can produce large quantities of air pollutant emissions. Wildfires in certain rural areas can produce large, short-te rm organic emissions. Prescribed burning is used a as a forest mana gement practice to establ ish favorable seedbeds, remove competing underbrush, accelerate nutrient cycling, control tree pests and contribute other ecological benefits. Agricultural burning covers agricultural burning prac tices used to clear and/or prepare land for planting. In land clearing fires, waste from logging operations is often burned under controlled conditions to reduce the potential fire haza rds in forests and to remove brush that can serve as a hos t for destructive insects.

The total wildfire acreage burned was obtained fr om the NCDFR for each county in the State. These numbers however are replaced with the 200 2 “typical” year for the purpose of modeling. Fire emissions are not easily grown or projec ted. Thus, the replacement was done so that the fires represented in the area source inventory ar e considered typical and do not reflect an abnormally low or high year as fa r as fires. The typical year forest fire inventories were developed by MACTEC, Inc. with input from state and federal forest resource staff. The typical year covered wildfire, prescribed burning, ag ricultural fires and land clearing fires. The development of the typical year inventory is described below.

State level ratios of acres over a longer-term record (three or more years) developed for each fire type relative to 2002. The 2002 acreage was then scaled up or down based on these ratios to develop a typical year in ventory. VISTAS Fire Special Inte rest Work Group based the ratio on county-level data for States that supplied long-term fire -by-fire acreage data rather than Statelevel ratios. Where States did not supply long-term fire-by-fire acreage data, MACTEC reverted to using State-level ratios. With one broad ex ception (wildfires) this method was implemented for all fires. MACTEC solicited long term fire -by-fire acreage data by fire type from each VISTAS State. A minimum of three or more year s of data were used to develop the ratios. Those data were then used to develop a rati o for each county based on the number of acres burned in each county for each fire type relative to 2002.

# If VISTAS had long term county prescribed fire data from a State, a county acreage ratio, described below, was developed.

acreageRx levelcounty actual 2002 acresRx levelcounty average termLong

= Ratio

This ratio was then multiplied times the actual 2002 acreage to get a typical value (basically the long term average county level acres). Wherever possible this calculation was performed on a fire-by-fire basis. The acreage cal culated using the ratio was then used with the fuel loading and emission factor values to calculate emissions.

There were three exceptions to this method.

Exception 1: Use of State Ratios for Wildfires
Wildfires estimates were developed using State ratios rather than count y ratios because some counties were showing unrealistic ratios, which were created by very short term data records or missing data. In addition, exceptionally large and small fires were removed from the database. VISTAS also removed all fires less than 0.1 acres from the dataset.

Exception 2: Correction for Blackened Acres on Forest Service Lands
Acres, submitted by the U.S. Forest Service (U SFS) for wildfires and prescribed fires on USFS lands, represented perimeter acres rather than “b lackened” acres. Therefore, for prescribed fires greater than 100 acres in size, th e acreage was adjusted to be 80 percent of the initial reported value. For prescribed fires of 100 acres or less, the acreage values were maintained as reported. All reported acreage values for wildfires were adju sted to be 66 percent of their values, as initially reported.

Exception 3: Missing/Non-reported data

When VISTAS did not receive data from a VISTAS State for a particular fire type, a composite average for the entire VISTAS region was used to determine the typical value for that type fire. This technique was applied to all fire types when data was missing.

For wildfires and prescribed burning, ratios were also developed for “northern” and “southern” tier States within the VISTAS region and those ratios were applied to each State with missing data depending upon whether they were considered a “northern” or “southern” tier State.

# Development of “southern” and “nor thern” tier data was an attempt to account for a change from a predominantly pine/evergreen ecosystem (southe rn) to a pine/deciduous ecosystem (northern).

Table 4.5-1 below presents a comparison in tons per year of the 2002 actual fire emissions and the 2002 typical fire emissions for NO x 

# , VOC, SO 2 

# , PM 10 

# , PM 2.5 

# and NH 3 

# for wildfires, and prescribed burning in North Carolina.

The typical wildfire and prescribed burni ng emissions for Catawba, Davidson, and Guilford counties for 2002 are found in Appendix E, Table 9. Note that there were no prescribed burning emissions in Catawba and Guilford counties.

The emissions shown in Table 4.5-2 below we re inadvertently omitted from modeling by the VISTAS contractors. This was al so true for the same source categ ories in other counties. There were not sufficient funds to perform new modeli ng. However, these emissions, compared to total emissions, are believed to be too small to ma ke any noticeable difference in the results.

# Table 4.5-1 2002 North Carolina Actu al and Typical Fire EmissionsActual Fire Emissions (TPY)NH395.1448.00Typical Fire Emissions (TPY)157.69157.87PM2.51825.841035.003002.502977.75PM102126.611210.003504.443472.12SO2124.8967.00206.78207.66VOC1005.04619.191692.571678.59NOx458.18282.28763.72763.89Fire TypeWildfiresPrescribedBurningWildfiresPrescribedBurning

# Table 4.5-2 2002 Fire Emissions Data (Typical) Omitted From Modeling in Tons Per Year (TPY)

County SCC SCC Description VOC NOX SO2 PM 10 

# PM 2.5 

# NH 3


# Catawba 2610000500 Open Burning of Land Clearing Debris 

# 159.87 68.91 234.29 234.29

Catawba 2801500262 Agricultural Burning, Wheat Backfire Burning 

# 10.58 16.83 16.83

Hickory Total TPY 170.45 68.91 0.00 251.12 251.12 0.00

Davidson 2610000500 Open Burning of Land Clearing Debris 

# 94.90 40.90 139.08 139.08

Davidson 2801500262 Agricultural Burning, Wheat Backfire Burning 

# 4.53 7.21 7.21

Guilford 2610000500 Open Burning of Land Clearing Debris 

# 428.43 184.67 627.87 627.87

Guilford 2801500262 Agricultural Burning, Wheat Backfire Burning 

# 16.37 26.05 26.05

Triad Total TPY 544.24 225.57 0.00 800.21 800.21 0.00

4.6 Application of Transportable Frac tion Adjustment Factors for Modeling

For modeling purposes only, VISTAS applied a tran sportable fraction adjustment factor to paved and unpaved road emissions; residential, i ndustrial/commercial/institutional, and road construction emissions; mining and quarrying emi ssions; crop tilling emissions; and beef cattle finishing emissions. The applicable SCC’s are 2294000000, 2296000000, 2311010000, 2311020000, 2311030000, 2325000000, 2801000003, and 2805001000 respectively For additional information about transportabl e fraction factors, see the paper titled Methodology to Estimate the Transportable Fracti on (TF) of Fugitive Dust Em issions for Regional and Urban Scale Air Quality Analysis in Appendix P.

# 5. 2009 AREA SOURCE EMISSION INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT

This Section describes the methodology used to develop the 2009 area source inventory. Separate methods for projecting emissions were used for non-agricultural (stationary area), agricultural area sources and forest fire area sources. The agricultural area sources method is for ammonia emissions, as ammonia contributes to the formation of regional haze and fine particulate matter.

The following Sections are based on excerpt s, with some editing, taken from a document entitled, Documentation of the Base G 2002 Base Year, 2009 and 2018 Emission Inventories for VISTAS and prepared by MACTEC, Inc.

5.1 Projection of Stationary Area Sources

VISTAS 2002 base year inventor y emissions were used as a starting point for calculating 2009 emissions. MACTEC, Inc. first back calculate d uncontrolled emissions from the 2002 base year inventory. Growth and control f actors were then applied based on controls initially identified for the Clean Air Interstate Rule (C AIR) and growth factor s identified for the CA IR projections. In some cases, Economic Growth Analysis System version 5.0 (EGAS 5.0) growth factors were used if no growth factor was available from the CAIR grow th factor files.

The 2009 growth factors were obtained from the USEPA growth factors and indirectly from 2010 and 2015 CAIR growth factors. Using a 2001 base year, interpolation of 2010 and 2015 CAIR growth factors yielded 2009 growth fact ors. MACTEC used the TREND function of Microsoft Excel for interpolation. Interpolated growth factors we re calculated at the State and SCC level.

In a few cases, additional growth factors had to be added for sources that had not initially been included in a draft 2002 inventory. These growth factors were obt ained from EGAS 5.0. Finally updates to growth factors from EGAS 5.0 were made for fuel fired emission sources. The updated growth factors reflected the most recent data from the Department of Energy’s Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). These data were used to reflect changes in energy efficiency resulting from new or updated fu el firing technologies.

North Carolina provided 2009 updated emission files us ed to update the emissions for each year for several source categories. Ho wever not all sources in the i nventory were included in these North Carolina updates. As a consequence, the final 2009 inventory for North Carolina included

# emissions updated using the North Carolina supplie d files and emissions developed using growth and control factors as outlined above.

5.2 Projection of Agricultural Area Sources

MACTEC used the version 3.1 2002 base year in ventory data (which was based on the CMU ammonia model version 3.6). MAC TEC obtained State specific growt h, if available. Otherwise, growth factors were used, which were devel oped from the USEPA Interstate Air Quality Transport Rule (IAQTR)/Ammonia i nventory. Growth factors for se veral agricultural livestock categories were developed by the USEPA, as part of the NEI.

In addition, ammonia growth factors for a few cate gories (mainly feedlots) were assigned to be the same as growth factors for PM emissions from the NEI projections. This assignment was made because the CMU model showed emissions from these categories but the NEI projections did not show ammonia emissions but did show PM emissions. No growth factors were found for horse and pony emissions. These emissions were held consta nt at 2002 levels.

No controls were identified by North Carolina; thus, all projected emissions for agricultural area sources represent simple growth with no controls.

Wild animal and human perspiration emissions were removed from the 2009 inventory because of considerable uncertainty in the accuracy of emission factors. All swine emissions for North Carolina were maintained at 2002 levels for the 2009 inventory to capture a moratorium on swine production in that State.

5.3 Projection of Forest Fires Area Sources

Several Federal agencies indicated that they had plans for increased prescribed fire burning in future years and that the “typi cal” fire inventory would likely not adequately capture those increases. Thus, MACTEC acquired the data nece ssary to provide 2009 specific projections for the prescribed fire component of the fire inventory.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) submitted annual acreage data by National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) and by county with esti mates of acres burned per day for each NWR. USFS provided fire-by-fire acreage estimates based on mapping projected burning acreage to current 2002 modeling days. However, USFWS did not submit data for VISTAS original base year preparation process, thus there was no known USFWS data in the 2002 actual or typical

# inventories. MACTEC therefor e developed a method that could use the county-level data submitted by USFWS.

Several VISTAS/ASIP States run a prescribed fire-permitting program. To avoid double counting, only State data and not USFWS or USFS data was used in those States for the 2002 actual inventory.

The method used by MACTEC to include the USFS data applied a county level data approach for USFS data where a State had a prescribed fire permitting program and a fire-by-fire replacement for USFS data in States without permit programs. MACTEC used a county level approach for all of the USFWS data. The approach used for each data set is discussed below.

For USFWS data, 2002 annual county acres burned was subtracted from the USFWS projected acreage. A 0.8 factor was applied to the differen ce to account for blackened acres instead of the total perimeter acres that were reported. The revised total additional USFWS acreage was then added to the total county “typical” acreage to determine future acreage burned for 2009.

MACTEC then allocated the increased acreage to current modeling days. The average daily acres burned data provided by USFWS pe r NWR/county was used to a llocate the acreage to the correct number of days required to burn all of the acres. Guidance supplied by USFWS indicated that up to three times the average daily acres bu rned could potentially be allocated to any one day.

For the USFS fire-by-fire acreage estimates, MA CTEC summed the USFS data at a county-level for States that had permit programs, then added the sum to the typical acreage and allocated the acres to current modeling days. For States that do not have a State prescribed fire permit program, MACTEC simply replaced the current fire- by-fire records in the database with fire-byfire records from the USFS and recalculated em issions based on fuel model and fuel loading. VISTAS also applied the same 0.8 correction fo r blackened acres applied to all USFS supplied acreage as the supplied values represented perimeter acres.

An additional problem with developing year-specific prescribed fire projections was how to adequately capture the temporal profile for thos e fires. In the 2002 actua l fire inventory, fires occur on same days as state/FLM records. In the 2002 “typical” year i nventory, fire acreage increased or decreased from acreag e on the same fire days as we re in the 2002 actual inventory, since the acres were simply increased for each day based on a multiplier used to convert from actual to typical.

# When prescribed fires acreage was added to a fu ture year, MACTEC added acreage to individual fire days proportional to the annual increase (if acreage on a day is 10 percent of annual, add 10 percent of projected incr ease to that same day).

# 6. VISTAS DEVELOPED 2002 NONROAD MOBILE SOURCE INVENTORY

Development of emission estimates for nonroad m obile sources is documented in the MACTEC, Inc. document titled Documentation of the Base G 2002 Base Year, 2009 and 2018, Emission Inventories for VISTAS

.

Nonroad mobile sources are thos e sources that can move but do not use the highway system. Examples include lawn mowers, agricultural equipment, construction equipment, aircraft engines, railroad locomotives, powerboats, and commer cial marine (ships). All but the aircraft engine, railroad locomotive emissions and commerc ial marine activity were estimated using the USEPA’s off-road mobile model NONROAD200 5c, which was released March 21, 2006. Direct emissions are generated w ith this model. This version incorporates all the USEPA final nonroad mobile engine emission standards, incl uding the recreational and large spark-ignition engines rules that were published in the Fede ral Register in November 2002. Although this model is considered to be a final model, an updated version is planned that may incorporate revised inputs for the small spark-ignition (SI) (< 19 kW) and recreational marine SI categories in conjunction with additional promulgate d nonroad mobile engine standards.

Nonroad mobile sources calculated through the NONROAD model are discussed in Section 6.1. Aircraft, railroad and commercia l marine emissions are discussed in Sections 6.2 through 6.4.

6.1 NONROAD Model Sources

The nonroad mobile source category includes a dive rse collection of equipment such as lawn mowers, chain saws, tractors, all terrain vehicles , fork lifts and constr uction equipment. The USEPA NONROAD2005c model ge nerates emissions directly and includes more than 80 different types of equipment. To facilitate analysis and reporting, the USEPA grouped the equipment types into ten equipment categories. These include:

Agricultural equipment Lawn and garden equipment Airport ground support equipment Logging equipment Commercial equipment Railroad maintenance equipment Construction equipment Recreational marine equipment Industrial equipment Recreational equipment

# Additionally, the emissions are broken out by five different engine type s. These include: 2-stroke and 4-stroke spark engi nes, diesel engines, liquid pe troleum gas (LPG) and compressed natural gas (CNG) fueled engines.

One of the default input files was edited to reflect North Carolina specific information. In the “SEASON.DAT” file, the region representative of North Carolina was changed from MidAtlantic to Southeast. This wa s done after an evaluation of the meteorological data in the two files and comparing it to that of Charlotte. Default data was us ed for the remaining input files used in the NONROAD model.

6.2 Aircraft Engines

Aircraft engines, like other engines, emit pollu tants whenever the engines are in operation. However, the only emissions that are of con cern for this inventory are the portion of the operation that occurs below the mixing layer. Th is is because the emissions tend to disperse whenever the aircraft is above the mixing laye r and therefore has litt le or no effect on ground level ozone.

The aircraft operations of interest are termed the landing and takeoff (LTO) cycle. The cycle begins when the aircraft approaches the airpor t, descending below the mixing layer, lands and taxis to the gate. It continues as the aircraft idles at the gate and then taxis back out to the runway for the subsequent takeoff and climbout as it heads back to cruising altitudes, above the mixing layer.

Aircraft can be categorized by use into four classifications: commercial, air taxis, general aviation and military. Commercial aircraft includ e those used for scheduled service transporting passengers and/or freight. Air taxis, or commuter ai rcraft, also fly sche duled service carrying passengers and/or freight but usua lly are smaller aircraft and oper ate on a more limited basis than commercial carriers. General aviation include all other non-military aircraft used for recreational flying, personal transportation, and various other activities. Milita ry aircraft cover a wide range of sizes, uses and operating missions. The military aircraft are treated as a separate classification since the LTO operations reported at the air ports group all military aircraft together.

Emission factors are available for the many aircraft and engine combinations that exist. Factors for each aircraft exist for four operating modes in the LTO cycle. Emissions are calculated by obtaining data for the number of LTO cycles of the various aircraft at each airport in question, multiplying by the appropriate factors, and summi ng the results for the ye ar under consideration.

# Development of the 2002 aircraft emissions are described in the MACTEC document titled Documentation of the Base G 2002 Base Year, 2009 and 2018 Emission Inventories for VISTAS

. This document refers back to a document titled “Development of the VISTAS Draft 2002 Mobile Source Emission Inventory (February 2004 Version)” prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. Both of these documents are included in Appendix P.

The starting point for development of aircraft emissions estimates is the 1999 National Emission Inventory (1999 NEI) prepared by the USEPA. These emissions were grown to appropriate values for 2002 and 2009 using growth factors developed by the USEPA for the CAIR. Along the way there was input by the vari ous States including North Carolin a to arrive at more accurate emission estimates.

6.3 Railroad Locomotives

Railroads are categorized by size (Class I, Clas s 2) and passenger service (Amtrak and North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Ra il Division). Class I ra ilroads are long haul operations, consisting of Norfolk Southern Corporation and CSX Corporation in North Carolina. Class II and Class III railroads ar e short lines, serving localized markets. Passenger service is provided by Amtrak and the NCDOT Rail Division in North Carolina. These entities lease trackage from Class I railroads.

Development of railroad emissions is described in the MACTEC document titled Documentation of the Base G 2002 Base Year, 2009 and 2018 Emission Inventories for VISTAS . The VISTAS/ASIP railroad emission estimates star ted with 1999 emission estimates developed for the USEPA’s 1999 NEI Version 2 as base year estimates for the VISTAS region. Additional information is provided in “Development of the VISTAS Draft 2002 Mobile Source Emission Inventory (February 2004 Version)” prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc.

Projected emissions for 2002 were developed in two steps as de scribed below. For 1999 to 2001, State-level rail fuel consumption was obtaine d from the Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration’s (EIA’s) Fuel Oil and Kerosene Sales. For 2001 to 2002, VISTAS applied national growth factors developed fr om fuel consumption projections in EIA’s Annual Energy Outlook. A growth factor of 1.4 was used for locomotives and applied to 1999 emissions to first develop 2001 emissions. Table 6.3-1 list s the growth factors used to generate 2002 emissions.

# Table 6.3-1 2002 National Rail Transportation Energy Use by Fuel Type (Trillion BTU)
2001 2002 Growth Factor (GF) Intercity Rail (Electric) 10.17 10.40 1.0226
Intercity Rail (Diesel) 16.60 16.88 1.0169 Transit Rail (Electric) 46.36 47.40 1.0224 Intercity/Transit Rail Average (SCC 2285002008) 1.0206 Commuter Rail (Electric) 16.13 16.49 1.0223
Commuter Rail (Diesel) 26.31 26.76 1.0171
Commuter Rail Average (SCC 2285002009) 1.0197 Freight Rail (Distillate) (SCCs 2285002000, 2285002005, 2285002006, 2285002007, 2285002010) 512.81 492.32 0.9600

Source: Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2003: Table 34. Transportation Sector Energy Use by Fuel Type Within a Mode



# 6.4 Commercial Marine Vessel (CMV)

The following description of development of co mmercial marine emission estimates is based on excerpts, with some editing, taken from the MACTEC document titled Documentation of the Base G 2002 Base Year, 2009 and 2018 Emission Inventories for VISTAS and a document titled “Development of the VISTAS Draft 2002 Mobi le Source Emission Inventory (February 2004 Version)” prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc

An initial 2002 base year emissions inventory for commercial marine vessels (CMV) was prepared for VISTAS in early 2004. The methods and data used to develop the inventory are presented in a February 9, 2004 report “ Development of the VISTAS Draft 2002 Mobile Source Emission Inventory (February 2004 Version) ” prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. Revisions to the initial 2002 emissions inventory (prepared by Pechan) were implemented to ensure that the latest State and local data were incorporated. For CMV, North Carolina provided no revised data.

For 2002 commercial marine vessels (CMVs), Pech an used 1999 emission estimates developed

# for the USEPA’s 1999 NEI Version 2 as base year estimates for the VISTAS region. Pechan then improved the spatial dist ribution of CMV emission estima tes for the VISTAS region.

Ideally, CMV emission estimates would be develope d using local activity da ta that account for vessel type, engine type and m ode of operation (cruise, mane uvering, and hotelling). Creating this type of “bottom-up” emission inventory requir es a large amount of effo rt. Therefore, Pechan utilized port-specific emission estimates develope d for the 1999 NEI, distributed using a revised allocation methodology, which incorporates inform ation on the number of port facilities in each county.

The 2002 VISTAS commercial marine inventory is based on the USEPA’s 1999 NEI Version 2.0, projected to 2002 using appropriate growth f actors. The 1999 NEI estimated emissions for these categories accordi ng to the following SCCs:

SCC Descriptor 1 Descriptor 3 Descriptor 6 Descriptor 8 2280002100 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Port emissions 2280002200 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Underway emissions 2280003100 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Residual Port emissions 2280003200 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Residual Underway emissions



# For the 1999 NEI, commercial marine diesel emissions were deve loped by obtaining 2000 emission estimates for all pollutants except SO 2 

# from the USEPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ) marine diesel regulatory background documentation ( Draft Regulatory Impact Analysis - Control of Emissions from Compression-Ignition Marine Engines ). To estimate emissions for 1999, 2000 estimates were b ackcast using growth f actors obtained from the draft Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) cited above. Steam-powered residual CMV emission estimates were developed by obtaining fuel usage data from OTAQ and applying fuelbased emission factors. A simila r method was used for diesel SO 2 

# emissions. National diesel usage was estimated assuming a sulfur conten t of 0.25 percent and USEPA emission factors.

In apportioning, distillate and resi dual fuels are considered separa tely. National diesel emissions were disaggregated into port and underway emi ssions estimates based on the assumption that 75 percent of distillate fuel is c onsumed within the port, while the remaining fuel is consumed while underway, consistent with USEPA guidance. Na tional residual emissions were disaggregated into port and underway emissions estimates base d on the assumption that 25 percent of residual fuel is consumed within the port, while th e remaining fuel is consumed while underway.

# To allocate to counties, port emissions were assigned to the 150 largest U.S. ports based on activity obtained from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Th e percentage of total traffic for each port was calculated by dividing the port-level traffic by the total traffic. Emissions for each port were then assigned to a single county.

Underway emissions are assigned to counties based on a county’s shipping lane traffic. The Bureau of Transportati on Statistics’ (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Databases-1999 contains data on the thousand tons per mile tr aveled for each shipping lane link in the United States (BTS-CD26). Where navi gable rivers form a county or State boundary, the shipping lane traffic is proportioned to individu al counties based on the length of shoreline that is shared. For example, if two counties share a navigable rive r, and both counties have the same length of shoreline, the shipping traffic is split evenly be tween the two counties. Shipping lanes that are not within counties, for example in the o cean, are associated to States based on BTS assignments. These waterway weights are then evenly distributed among the counties within these States that have navigable waterways. All shipping activity is summed at the county-level and compared with national shipping activity to determine what portion of activity can be attributed to individual countie s. These proportions were used in disaggregating the national CMV emission estimates to the county level.

States that share borders with non-VISTAS States along the Missi ssippi and Ohio Rivers have expressed concern about the representativeness of port emission estimates at a county-level. Revising the county-level emissions estimates w ould allow more accurate modeling of emissions in the VISTAS states.

For underway emissions, Pechan believes that th e allocation procedure results in a reasonable distribution of county-level emi ssions. However, the methodol ogy to allocate port emissions results in all the emissions bei ng assigned to a single county.

Port areas encompass multiple States and coun ties and in some cases, multiple waterways. Therefore, the emissions allocation process must incorporate all counties in the vicinity of the port where activity is occurring. This is especial ly true for inland rive rs where activity takes place on both riverbanks and for ten river miles or more outside the port city. The revised methodology allocates port emissions based on a surrogate for port-rela ted activity in each county, rather than using a singl e county to define the port.

The report, Waterborne Commer ce of the United States, Calendar Year 1999, hereafter referred to as Waterborne Commerce, presents the car go tonnage and number of vessel trips in major waterways of the United States. The report defi nes port areas, which USACE uses to develop

# the Top 150 Ports in the United States by amount of cargo tonnage. As discussed previously, the 1999 NEI allocates all the port emissions to thes e 150 ports based on the cargo tonnage handled by the port. Pechan uses this a llocation of emissions to each port area as the starting point of its revised allocation process. Morehead City Harb or and the Port of Wilmington are the two main ports in North Carolina.

The next step was to develop a list of counties th at make up the port area. Port area definitions were obtained from Waterborne Commerce . The port area definition for Morehead City Harbor port was “Morehead City Harbor, NC”. The por t area definition for Wilmington City port was “Both banks of the Cape Fear River extending fr om a point about 18 miles below the foot of Castle St. in Wilmington to a poi nt about 2 miles above the Railroad Bridge at Navassa, and both banks of Northeast (Cape Fear) River from its mouth to a po int about 1.67 miles above the Hilton Railroad Bridge”. Using the port defi nitions by river mile, P echan established which counties are included in each port ar ea. The Port of Wilmington is included in the counties of Hanover and New Brunswick. The Morehead City Harbor is included in Carteret county.

The next step in allocating emissions is to deve lop a surrogate for the amount of CMV activity in each county of the port area. Pechan assumed th at the activity of vessels in each county is related to the number of port f acilities operating in a given county. Port facilities include terminals, piers, wharves, and docks that are involved in all types of commercial activity and support services. Pechan obtaine d the number of port facilities in each county from USACE reports, The Port Series Reports . The USACE periodically su rveys the commercial marine industry to obtain information on po rt facilities and publishe s it in The Port Series Reports. The reports give the name, location, operations, and describe the physical and inter-modal characteristics of the facilities. The data include s the location of the facility by river mile, State, and county.

For each port area, Pechan calculated the ratio be tween the number of port facilities in each county to the total number of facilities in all coun ties that make up the port area. This ratio was used to allocate emissions for each port area to the county-level. The ratio for Morehead City Harbor was 1.0 in Carteret count y and the ratios for the Port of Wilmington were 0.8974 in New Hanover county and 0.1026 in Brunswick county. Pechan was directed to perform the reallocation for all VISTAS ports.

There are no commercial marine emissi ons in the Hickory or Triad areas.

# 7. 2009 NONROAD MOBILE SO URCE EMISSION INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT

The subsections that follow describe the project ion process used to develop 2009 nonroad mobile source projection estimates for sources f ound in the NONROAD model and those sources estimated outside of the model (locomotives, airplanes, and commercial marine vessels).

7.1 Projection of NONROAD Mobile Sources

NONROAD model input files were prepared base d on the 2002 base year inventory input files with appropriate updates for the pr ojection years. Other specific updates for the projection years for NONROAD model sources consist of:

1. Revise the emission inventory year in the model (as well as various output file naming commands) to be reflective of the projection year.

2. Revise the fuel sulfur content for ga soline and diesel powered equipment.

3. Implement a limited number of local cont rol program changes (national control program changes are handled internally with in the NONROAD model, so explicit input file changes are not required).

All equipment population growth an d fleet turnover impacts are ha ndled internally within the NONROAD model, so that explicit i nput file changes are not required.

The final NONROAD2005c that was used for inve ntory development is capable of handling separate diesel fuel sulfur inputs for land- based and marine-based nonroad mobile source equipment in a single model execution. The followi ng diesel fuel sulfur values were used: Diesel S (ppm) 2002 2009 Land-Based 2500 348 Marine-Based 2638 408

7.2 Projection of Non-NONROAD Model Sources

Using the 2002 base year emissions inventory fo r aircraft, locomotives, and CMV prepared as described earlier in this document, correspondin g emission projections fo r 2009 were developed. The following description is largely ta ken from the MACTEC document titled Documentation of

# the Base G 2002 Base Year, 2009 and 2018 Emission Inventories for VISTAS . Briefly, the methodology relies on growth and control factors de veloped from inventories used in support of recent USEPA rulemakings, and consists of the following steps:

(a) Begin with the 2002 base year emission estimates for aircraft, locomotive, and CMV.

(b) Detailed inventory data (both before and after controls) for these same emission sources for 1996, 2010, 2015, and 2020 were obtained fr om the USEPA's CAIR Technical Support Document. Using these data, combined growth and control factors for the period 2002-2009 were estimated using straight line interpolation betw een 1996 and 2010 (for 2009). This is done at the State-coun ty-SCC-pollutant level of detail.

(c) The USEPA growth and control data are matched against the 2002 VISTAS base year data using State-county-SCC-pollutant as the match key. Ideally, there would be a one-to-one match and the process would end at this point. Unfortunately, actual match results were not always ideal, so additi onal matching criteria were required. For subsequent reference, this init ial (highest resolution) matchi ng criterion is denoted as the “CAIR-Primary” criterion.

(d) A second matching criterion is applied that utilizes a simila r, but higher-level SCC (lower resolution) matching approach. For exam ple, SCC 2275020000 (commercial aircraft) in the 2002 base year inventory data would be matched with SCC 2275000000 (all aircraft) in the CAIR data. This criteri on is applied to records in the 2002 base year emissions file that are not matched using the “CAIR-Primary” criterion, and is also performed at the State-county-SCC-pollutant level of detail. For subsequent reference, this is denoted as the “CAIR-Secondary” criterion. At the end of this process, a number of unmatched records continued to remain, so a thir d level matching criterion was required.

(e) In the third matching step, the most freque ntly used SCC in the USEPA CAIR files for each of the aircraft, locomotive, and commercia l marine sectors is averaged at the State level to produce a “default” State and pollutant -specific growth and control factor for the sector. The resulting factor is used as a “default” grow th factor for all unmatched county-SCC-pollutant level data in each State. In effect, St ate-specific growth data are applied to county level data for which an explicit match between the VISTAS 2002 base year data and the USEPA CAIR data could not be developed. The default growth and control SCCs are 2275020000 (commercial ai rcraft) for the aircraft sector, 2280002000 (commercial marine diesel total) for the CMV sector, and 2285002000 (railroad

# equipment diesel total) for the locomotive s ector. Matches made usi ng this criterion are denoted as “CAIR-Tertiary” matches.

(f) According to USEPA documentation, the CA IR baseline emissions include the impacts of the (then proposed) Tier 4 (T4) nonroad mobile diesel rulemaking, which implements a low sulfur fuel requirement that affect s both future CMV and locomotive emissions. However, the impacts of this rule were origin ally intended to be excluded from the initial VISTAS 2018 forecast, which was to include on ly “on-the-books” controls. (The T4 rule was finalized subsequent to the developmen t of the preliminary 2018 inventory in March of 2004.) Given its final st atus, T4 impacts have now been moved into the “on the books” inventory for nonroad mobile source eq uipment. In addition, since there are no other proposed rules affecti ng the nonroad mobile sour ce sector between 2002 and 2018, there is no difference between the 2018 “on the books” and 2018 “on the way” inventories for the sector; so that only a single forecast inventory (for each evaluation year) was developed. Nevertheless, since the algorithms developed to produce the VISTAS forecasts were developed when th ere was a distinction between the “on the books” and “on the way” inventories, the dis tinct algorithms used to produce the two inventories have been maintained even though th e conceptual distincti ons have been lost. This approach was taken for two reasons. Fi rst, it allowed the pr eviously developed algorithms to be utilized without change. S econd, it allowed for separate treatment of the T4 emissions impact which was important as those impacts have changed between the proposed and final T4 rules. Thus, previous USEPA inventories that include the proposed T4 impacts would not be accurate. Therefore, the procedural discussion continues to reflect the distinctions between non-T4 and T4 emissions, as these di stinctions continue to be intrinsically important to the forecasti ng process. Therefore, a second set of USEPA CAIR files that excluded the Tier 4 diesel impacts was obtained and the same matching exercise described above in steps (b) th rough (e) was performed using these “No T4” files. It is important to note that the matc hing exercise described in steps (b) through (e) cannot simply be replaced because the “No T4” files obtained from the USEPA include only those SCCs specifically affected by the T4 rule (i.e., diesel CMV and locomotives). So in effect, the matching exercise was a ugmented (rather than replaced) with an additional three criteria anal ogous to those described in st eps (c) through (e), and these are denoted as the “No T4-Primary,” “No T4 -Secondary,” and “No T4 -Tertiary” criteria. Because they exclude the impacts of the pr oposed T4 rule, matches using the “No T4” criteria supersede matches made using the ba sic CAIR criteria (as described in steps (c) through (e) above).

# (g) The CAIR matching criteria were overridden for any record for which States provided local growth data. Only North Carolina pr ovided these forecasts, as North Carolina has provided specific growth factors for airport emissions in four counties. Because the provided data were based on forecasted changes in landings and takeoffs at major North Carolina airports, the factor s were applied only to commercial (SCC 2275020000) and air taxi (SCC 2275060000) emissions. Emissions for ecasts for military and general aviation aircraft operations, as well as all aircraft operations in counties other than the four identified in the North Carolina growth factor submission, continued to utilize the growth factors developed according to steps (b) thr ough (f) above. The locally generated growth factor (2002 to 2009) applie d in Guilford County was 0.97.

(h) Using this approach, each State-county-SCC-pollutant was assigned a combined growth and control factor using the USEPA CAIR forecast or lo cally provided data. The 22,838 data records for aircraft, locomotives, and CM V in the 2002 base year emissions file were assigned growth factors in accordance with the following breakdown:

48 records matched State-provided growth factors, 4,179 records matched using the CAIR-Primary criterion, 240 records matched using the CAIR-Secondary criterion, 7,463 records matched using the CAIR-Tertiary criterion, 720 records matched using the No T4-Primary criterion, 3,858 records matched using the No T4-Secondary criterion, and 6,330 records matched using th e No T4-Tertiary criterion.

(i) Finally, the impacts of the T4 rule as adopted were applied to the grown “non T4” emission estimates. The actual T4 emission st andards do not affect aircraft, locomotive, or CMV directly, but associated diesel fuel sulfur requirements do affect locomotives and CMV. Lower fuel sulfur content affects both SO 2 

# and PM emissions. Expected fuel sulfur content was obtained for 2009 from th e USEPA technical support document for the final T4 rule ( Final Regulatory Analysis: Control of Emissions from Nonroad Diesel Engines , EPA420-R-04-007, May 2004). According to that document, the average diesel fuel sulfur content for locomotives and CM V is expected to be 408 parts per million by weight (ppmW) in 2009. This compares to expected non-T4 fuel sulfur levels of 2599 ppmW in 2009. Table 7.2-1 uses calculate d emissions estimates for base and T4 control scenarios to estimate emission reduction impacts.

# Table 7.2-1 Estimated Emission Reduc tion Impacts based on T-4 Rule

2009 CMV SO 2 

## = Non-T4 SO 2 

## × 0.1569 Locomotive SO 2 

## = Non-T4 SO 2 

## × 0.1569 CMV PM = Non-T4 PM × 0.8962 Locomotive PM = Non-T4 PM × 0.8117 

# However, since the diesel fuel sulfur c ontent assumed for the 2002 VISTAS base year inventory, upon which the 2009 inventory was based, is 2500 ppmW, a small adjustment to the emission reduction multiplier calculated from the T4 rule is appropriate since they are measured relative to modestly differ ent sulfur contents (2599 ppmW for 2009). Correcting for these modest differences produces the emission reduction impact estimates relative to forecasts based on the VIST AS 2002 inventory shown in Table 7.2-2.

Table 7.2-2 Estimated Emission Reduction Impacts Relative to VISTAS 2002 Base Year Values

2009 CMV SO 2 

## = Non-T4 SO 2 

## × 0.1632 Locomotive SO 2 

## = Non-T4 SO 2 

## × 0.1632 CMV PM = Non-T4 PM × 0.9004 Locomotive PM = Non-T4 PM × 0.8187



# These factors were applied directly to the non-T4 emission forecasts to produce the final VISTAS 2009 emissions i nventories for aircraft, locomotive, and CMV.

During the development of the preliminary 2018 VI STAS inventory in Ma rch 2004, this process yielded reasonable results and exhibited no partic ular systematic concerns. However, when the 2009 Base F inventory was developed, significant concerns related to SO 2 

# and PM were encountered. Essentially, what was revealed by the Base F 2009 forecast was a series of apparent inconsistencies in the CAIR 2010 and 2015 emissi on inventories (as compared to the 1996 and 2020 CAIR inventories) that were masked during the construction of the “longer-term” 2018 inventory.

For the most part, the issue seems to be centered on SO 2 

# and PM records, which are those records primarily affected by the T4 rule. But, as noted above, there does not seem to be any pattern of consistency that would indicate that eith er inclusion or exclusion of T4 rule impacts is the underlying cause. Moreover, where they occu r, the observed growth extremes generally affect both SO 2 

# and PM equally, while one would expect PM effects to be buffered if the T4 rule

# was the underlying cause, since changes in diesel fu el sulfur content will only affect a fraction of PM (i.e., sulfate), while directly reducing SO 2 

# .
While forecast inventories for aircraft, lo comotives, and CMV were developed for 2009 and 2018 using both growth methods, it was ultimately decided to utilize the 1996-2020 growth basis since it provided more reasonable growth rates for 2009.



# 8. QUALITY ASSURANCE OF EMISSIONS INVENTORY

8.1 2002 Area and Nonroad Mobile

Many emission estimation methods are based on AP -42 factors located on the USEPA website at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/, factors given in the Procedures document, and factors given in the documents of the Emission Inventor y Improvement Program website located at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/ . Sources of error would primarily be associated with multiplier values, data entry errors, and the accuracy of formulas.

For the portion of the 2002 inventory developed by North Carolina, specific quality assurance (QA) procedures were followed. Under the dir ection of the Quality Assurance Coordinator, emission sources whose contribution were either at the high or low end of the range of estimates were scrutinized more closely to ensure that th e emission estimates were estimated correctly. In addition, the raw data used in the calculations were verified to make sure transference to the spreadsheets was accomplished accurately. Furthe rmore, the formulas used to calculate the emissions were reviewed and checked for corr ectness. Random independent checks of the calculations were also performed to en sure the accuracy of the inventory.

For the portion of the 2002 inventory devel oped by VISTAS and MACTEC, specific QA procedures were followed. These proce dures are outlined in the document titled Documentation of the Base G 2002 Base Year, 2009, and 2018, Emission Inventories for VISTAS prepared for VISTAS by MACTEC, Inc. Throughout the inventor y development process, quality assurance steps were performed to ensure that no double co unting of emissions occurre d, and to ensure that a full and complete inventory was developed fo r VISTAS. Quality assurance was an important component to the inventory development process and MACTEC performed the following QA steps on the area source compone nt of the 2002 inventory:

1. All CERR and NIF format State supplied data submittals were run through the USEPA’s Format and Content checking software.

# 2. SCC level emission summaries were prepared and evaluated to ensure that emissions were consistent and that th ere were no missing sources.

3. Fields were either added or used within each NIF data table to track the sources of data for each emission record.

4. Data product summaries were provided to both the VISTAS Emission Inventory Technical Advisor and to Area Source and Fi res SIWG representatives for review and comment. Changes based on these comments were implemented in the files.

5. Version numbering was used for all i nventory files developed. The version numbering process used a decimal system to track major and minor changes. For example, a major change would result in a version going from 1.0 to 2.0. A minor change would cause a version number to go from 1.0 to 1.1. Minor changes resulting from largely editorial changes would result in a change from 1.00 to 1.01.

6. All final NIF files were checked using the USEPA Format and Content checking software and summary information by State and pollutant were prepared comparing the previous versions of the inventory to the latest.
For the fires inventory, data related to fuel loading and fuel consumption was reviewed and approved by the VISTAS Fire SIWG to ensure that values used for each type of fire and each individual fire were appropriate. Members of the VISTAS Fire SIWG included representatives from most State Divisions of Forestry (or equiva lent) as well as U.S. Forest Service and National Park Service personnel.

In addition, for the nonroad portion of the invent ory prepared by VISTAS, tier comparisons (by pollutant) were developed between the revised 2002 base year inventory and the initial base year inventory.

8.2 2009 Area and Nonroad Mobile

For the portion of the 2009 inventory developed by North Carolina, specific QA procedures were followed. Under the direction of the Quality Assurance Coordinator, emission sources whose contribution were either at the high or low end of the range of estimates were scrutinized more closely to ensure that the emission estimates were estimated correctly. In addition, the raw data used in the calculations were verified to ma ke sure transference to the spreadsheets was accomplished accurately. Furthermore, the formulas used to calculate the daily emissions were

# reviewed and checked for correctness. Random i ndependent checks of the calculations were also performed to ensure the accuracy of the inventory.

For the portion of the 2009 inventory developed by VISTAS and MACTEC, Inc., specific QA procedures were followed. These procedur es are outlined in the document titled Documentation of the Base G 2002 Base Year, 2009, and 2018, Emission Inventories for VISTAS prepared for VISTAS by MACTEC, Inc. Throughout the invent ory development process, quality assurance steps were performed to ensure that no double co unting of emissions occu rred, to ensure that a full and complete inventory was developed for VISTAS, and to make sure that projection calculations were working correctly. Quality a ssurance was an important component to the inventory development process and MACTEC performed the following QA steps on the area source and the nonroad mobile source components of the 2009 inventory:

1. All final files were run through EPA’s Format and Content checking software.

2. SCC level emission summaries were prepared and evaluated to ensure that emissions were consistent and that th ere were no missing sources.

3. Tier comparisons (by pollutant) were developed between the 2002 base year inventory and the 2009 projection inventor y. In addition, total VISTAS pollutant summaries were prepared to compare total emissions by pollutant between earlier and later versions of the inventory.

4. Data product summaries were provided to both the VISTAS Emission Inventory Technical Advisor and to the SIWG repr esentatives for review and comment. Changes based on these comments we re implemented in the files.

5. Version numbering was used for all i nventory files developed. The version numbering process used a decimal system to track major and minor changes. For example, a major change would result in a version going from 1.0 to 2.0. A minor change would cause a version number to go from 1.0 to 1.1. Minor changes resulting from largely editorial changes would result in a change from 1.00 to 1.01.



# 9. ADDITIONAL DATA

# 9.1 SIC TO NAICS CROSSWALK

# 9.2 FRACTION OF NAICS CODE EM PLOYMENT USED TO CREATE SIC EMPLOYMENT

SIC NAICS SIC Employees 1997 NAICS Employees ‘1997 Employee Fraction NAICS description

Factory Finished Wood Surface Coating



# 2426 321918 10521 38100 0.276 Other millwork (including flooring) 

# 2426 337215 6310 75382 0.084 Showcase, partition, shelving, & locker mfg 

# 2426 321912 17109 39763 0.430 Cut stock, resawing lumber, & planing 

# 2429 321113 304 119760 0.003 Sawmills 

# 2429 321920 684 51134 0.013 Wood container & pallet mfg 

# 2429 321999 355 43839 0.008 All other miscellaneous wood product mfg 

# 2431 321911 64771 64771 1.000 Wood window & door mfg 

# 2431 321918 27488 38100 0.721 Other millwork (including flooring) 

# 2434 337110 79579 99257 0.802 Wood kitchen cabinet & counter top mfg 

# 2435 321211 22151 22151 1.000 Hardwood veneer & plywood mfg 

# 2436 321212 28843 28843 1.000 Softwood veneer & plywood mfg 

# 2439 321912 0 39763 0.000 Cut stock, resawing lumber, & planing 

# 2439 321214 32522 32522 1.000 Truss mfg 

# 2439 321113 0 119760 0.000 Sawmills 

# 2439 321213 5372 5372 1.000 Engineered wood member (except truss) mfg 

# 2441 321920 4885 51134 0.096 Wood container & pallet mfg 

# 2448 321920 38994 51134 0.763 Wood container & pallet mfg 

# 2449 321920 5701 51134 0.111 Wood container & pallet mfg 

# 2451 321991 68269 68269 1.000 Manufactured home (mobile home) mfg 

# 2452 321992 22965 22965 1.000 Prefabricated wood building mfg 

# 2493 321219 25269 25269 1.000 Reconstituted wood product mfg 

# 2499 339999 13740 74137 0.185 All other miscellaneous mfg 

# 2499 332321 0 74944 0.000 Metal window & door mfg 

# 2499 321920 870 51134 0.017 Wood container & pallet mfg 

# 2499 321912 549 39763 0.014 Cut stock, resawing lumber, & planing 

# 2499 321999 41844 43839 0.954 All other miscellaneous wood product mfg Furniture & Fixtures Surface Coating and Part of Miscellaneous Degreasing



# 2511 337122 123368 128248 0.962 Nonupholstered wood household furniture mfg 

# 2512 337121 85258 90009 0.947 Upholstered household furniture mfg 

# 2514 337124 22835 22835 1.000 Metal household furniture mfg 

# 2515 337121 1601 90009 0.018 Upholstered household furniture mfg

# SIC NAICS SIC Employees 1997 NAICS Employees ‘1997 Employee Fraction NAICS description



# 2515 337910 23072 23072 1.000 Mattress mfg 

# 2517 337129 4273 4273 1.000 Wood television, radio, & sewing machine cabinet mfg 

# 2519 337125 4708 4708 1.000 Household furniture (except wood & metal) mfg 

# 2521 337211 30641 30641 1.000 Wood office furniture mfg 

# 2522 337214 44222 44222 1.000 Office furniture (except wood) mfg 

# 2531 336360 20784 45600 0.456 Motor vehicle seating & interior trim mfg 

# 2531 337127 15254 38218 0.399 Institutional furniture mfg 

# 2531 339942 941 7990 0.118 Lead pencil & art good mfg 

# 2541 337110 9785 99257 0.099 Wood kitchen cabinet & counter top mfg 

# 2541 337212 24363 24363 1.000 Custom architectural woodwork & millwork mfg 

# 2541 337215 23305 75382 0.309 Showcase, partition, shelving, & locker mfg 

# 2542 337215 44472 75382 0.590 Showcase, partition, shelving, & locker mfg 

# 2591 337920 19617 19617 1.000 Blind & shade mfg 

# 2599 337127 22448 38218 0.587 Institutional furniture mfg 

# 2599 339113 2925 85315 0.034 Surgical appliance & supplies mfg Part of Misc. Degreasing



# 3312 324199 1731 3671 0.472 All other petroleum & coal products mfg 

# 3312 331111 144074 146514 0.983 Iron & steel mills 

# 3313 331112 3724 3724 1.000 Electrometallurgical ferroalloy product mfg 

# 3313 331492 311 11610 0.027 Other nonferrous metal secondary smelting, refining, & alloying 

# 3315 331222 23489 23489 1.000 Steel wire drawing 

# 3315 332618 2265 46174 0.049 Other fabricated wire product mfg 

# 3316 331221 14362 14362 1.000 Cold-rolled steel shape mfg 

# 3317 331210 27723 27723 1.000 Iron & steel pipes & tubes mfg from purchased steel 

# 3321 331511 83570 86198 0.970 Iron foundries 

# 3322 331511 2628 86198 0.030 Iron foundries 

# 3324 331512 22673 22673 1.000 Steel investment foundries 

# 3325 331513 23982 23982 1.000 Steel foundries (except investment) 

# 3331 331411 7360 7360 1.000 Primary smelting & refining of copper 

# 3334 331312 15763 15763 1.000 Primary aluminum production 

# 3339 331419 10132 10132 1.000 Other nonferrous metal primary smelting & refining

# SIC NAICS SIC Employees 1997 NAICS Employees ‘1997 Employee Fraction NAICS description



# 3341 331423 1768 2333 0.758 Secondary smelting, refining, & alloying of copper



# 3341 331492 5485 11610 0.472 Other nonferrous metal secondary smelting, refining, & alloying 

# 3341 331314 6226 6714 0.927 Secondary smelting & alloying of aluminum 

# 3351 331421 21150 21150 1.000 Copper rolling, drawing, & extruding 

# 3353 331315 25111 25111 1.000 Aluminum sheet, plate, & foil mfg 

# 3353 332996 0 29364 0.000 Fabricated pipe & pipe fitting mfg 

# 3354 331316 30357 30357 1.000 Aluminum extruded product mfg 

# 3355 331319 2657 4306 0.617 Other aluminum rolling & drawing 

# 3356 331491 17237 25872 0.666 Other nonferrous metal rolling, drawing, & extruding Part of Misc. Degreasing and Part of Electrical Insulation Surface Coating



# 3357 331319 1649 4306 0.383 Other aluminum rolling & drawing 

# 3357 331422 4692 4692 1.000 Copper wire (except mechanical) drawing 

# 3357 331491 8635 25872 0.334 Other nonferrous metal rolling, drawing, & extruding 

# 3357 335921 8589 8589 1.000 Fiber optic cable mfg 

# 3357 335929 46267 46267 1.000 Other communication & energy wire mfg Part of Misc. Degreasing



# 3363 331521 27717 27717 1.000 Aluminum die-casting foundries 

# 3364 331522 17243 17243 1.000 Nonferrous (except aluminum) die-casting foundries 

# 3365 331524 34098 34098 1.000 Aluminum foundries (except die-casting) 

# 3366 331525 8909 8909 1.000 Copper foundries (except die-casting) 

# 3369 331528 6529 6529 1.000 Other nonferrous foundries (except diecasting) 

# 3398 332811 22674 22674 1.000 Metal heat treating 

# 3399 331111 2440 146514 0.017 Iron & steel mills 

# 3399 331314 488 6714 0.073 Secondary smelting & alloying of aluminum 

# 3399 331423 565 2333 0.242 Secondary smelting, refining, & alloying of copper 

# 3399 331492 5814 11610 0.501 Other nonferrous metal secondary smelting, refining, & alloying 

# 3399 332618 2088 46174 0.045 Other fabricated wire product mfg Part of Misc. Degreasing and Me tal Containers Surface Coating



# 3411 332431 27316 27316 1.000 Metal can mfg

# SIC NAICS SIC Employees 1997 NAICS Employees ‘1997 Employee Fraction NAICS description



# 3412 332439 6318 14922 0.423 Other metal container mfg Part of Misc. Degreasing



# 3421 332211 11129 11230 0.991 Cutlery & flatware (except precious) mfg 

# 3423 332212 42947 50388 0.852 Hand & edge tool mfg 

# 3425 332213 9149 9149 1.000 Saw blade & handsaw mfg 

# 3429 332439 4135 14922 0.277 Other metal container mfg 

# 3429 332510 70884 74285 0.954 Hardware mfg 

# 3429 332919 750 18739 0.040 Other metal valve & pipe fitting mfg 

# 3431 332998 9994 9994 1.000 Enameled iron & metal sanitary ware mfg 

# 3432 332913 16202 16202 1.000 Plumbing fixture fitting & trim mfg 

# 3432 332999 474 79070 0.006 All other miscellaneous fabricated metal product mfg 

# 3433 333414 22495 24666 0.912 Heating equipment (except warm air furnaces) mfg 

# 3441 332312 84704 93433 0.907 Fabricated structural metal mfg 

# 3442 332321 72970 74944 0.974 Metal window & door mfg 

# 3443 333415 339 119795 0.003 AC & warm air heating & commercial/industrial refrig equip mfg 

# 3443 332420 33704 33704 1.000 Metal tank (heavy gauge) mfg 

# 3443 332313 25453 25453 1.000 Plate work mfg 

# 3443 332410 27542 27542 1.000 Power boiler & heat exchanger mfg 

# 3444 332322 129826 129826 1.000 Sheet metal work mfg 

# 3444 332439 2074 14922 0.139 Other metal container mfg 

# 3446 332323 30960 34391 0.900 Ornamental & architectural metal work mfg 

# 3448 332311 25946 25946 1.000 Prefabricated metal building & component mfg 

# 3449 332114 15219 15219 1.000 Custom roll forming 

# 3449 332312 8729 93433 0.093 Fabricated structural metal mfg 

# 3449 332321 1974 74944 0.026 Metal window & door mfg 

# 3449 332323 349 34391 0.010 Ornamental & architectural metal work mfg 

# 3451 332721 80404 80404 1.000 Precision turned product mfg 

# 3452 332722 52995 52995 1.000 Bolt, nut, screw, rivet, & washer mfg 

# 3462 332111 26432 26432 1.000 Iron & steel forging 

# 3463 332112 9129 9129 1.000 Nonferrous forging 

# 3465 336370 126905 126905 1.000 Motor vehicle metal stamping 

# 3466 332115 4682 4682 1.000 Crown & closure mfg 

# 3469 332116 93086 93086 1.000 Metal stamping

# SIC NAICS SIC Employees 1997 NAICS Employees ‘1997 Employee Fraction NAICS description



# 3469 332214 7724 7724 1.000 Kitchen utensil, pot, & pan mfg 

# 3471 332813 74640 74640 1.000 Electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, & coloring

Part of Misc. Degreasing and Sheet, Strip & Coil Surface Coating



# 3479 332812 55904 55904 1.000 Metal coating/engraving (exc jewelry/silverware)/allied services 

# 3479 339911 79 34773 0.002 Jewelry (except costume) mfg 

# 3479 339912 103 6459 0.016 Silverware & plated ware mfg 

# 3479 339914 29 14573 0.002 Costume jewelry & novelty mfg Part of Misc. Degreasing



# 3482 332992 6863 6863 1.000 Small arms ammunition mfg 

# 3483 332993 9427 9427 1.000 Ammunition (except small arms) mfg 

# 3484 332994 9907 9907 1.000 Small arms mfg 

# 3489 332995 12285 12285 1.000 Other ordnance & accessories mfg 

# 3491 332911 53459 53459 1.000 Industrial valve mfg 

# 3492 332912 37132 37132 1.000 Fluid power valve & hose fitting mfg 

# 3493 332611 5381 5381 1.000 Spring (heavy gauge) mfg 

# 3494 332919 17652 18739 0.942 Other metal valve & pipe fitting mfg 

# 3494 332999 564 79070 0.007 All other miscellaneous fabricated metal product mfg 

# 3495 332612 18798 18798 1.000 Spring (light gauge) mfg 

# 3495 334518 175 6333 0.028 Watch, clock, & part mfg 

# 3496 332618 41821 46174 0.906 Other fabricated wire product mfg 

# 3497 332999 5648 79070 0.071 All other miscellaneous fabricated metal product mfg 

# 3497 322225 4967 4967 1.000 Laminated aluminum foil mfg for flexible packaging uses 

# 3498 332996 29364 29364 1.000 Fabricated pipe & pipe fitting mfg 

# 3499 332439 2331 14922 0.156 Other metal container mfg 

# 3499 332510 3401 74285 0.046 Hardware mfg 

# 3499 332919 375 18739 0.020 Other metal valve & pipe fitting mfg 

# 3499 332999 63736 79070 0.806 All other miscellaneous fabricated metal product mfg 

# 3499 337215 1295 75382 0.017 Showcase, partition, shelving, & locker mfg 

# 3499 339914 568 14573 0.039 Costume jewelry & novelty mfg

# SIC NAICS SIC Employees 1997 NAICS Employees ‘1997 Employee Fraction NAICS description



# 3499 332117 10760 10760 1.000 Powder metallurgy part mfg Part of Misc. Degreasing and Machinery & Equipment Surface Coating



# 3511 333611 19529 19529 1.000 Turbine & turbine generator set unit mfg 

# 3519 333618 56338 56348 1.000 Other engine equipment mfg 

# 3519 336399 896 174465 0.005 All other motor vehicle parts mfg 

# 3523 332212 60 50388 0.001 Hand & edge tool mfg 

# 3523 333922 320 39599 0.008 Conveyor & conveying equipment mfg 

# 3523 333111 66370 66370 1.000 Farm machinery & equipment mfg 

# 3523 332323 3082 34391 0.090 Ornamental & architectural metal work mfg 

# 3524 332212 60 50388 0.001 Hand & edge tool mfg 

# 3524 333112 28617 28617 1.000 Lawn & garden tractor & home lawn & garden equipment mfg 

# 3531 333120 74965 74965 1.000 Construction machinery mfg 

# 3531 333923 10263 18014 0.570 Overhead traveling crane, hoist, & monorail system mfg 

# 3531 336510 2379 34012 0.070 Railroad rolling stock mfg 

# 3532 333131 13547 13547 1.000 Mining machinery & equipment mfg 

# 3533 333132 29451 29451 1.000 Oil & gas field machinery & equipment mfg 

# 3534 333921 9442 9442 1.000 Elevator & moving stairway mfg 

# 3535 333922 39279 39599 0.992 Conveyor & conveying equipment mfg 

# 3536 333923 7751 18014 0.430 Overhead traveling crane, hoist, & monorail system mfg 

# 3537 333924 25953 25953 1.000 Industrial truck, tractor, trailer, & stacker machinery mfg 

# 3537 332439 64 14922 0.004 Other metal container mfg 

# 3537 332999 240 79070 0.003 All other miscellaneous fabricated metal product mfg 

# 3541 333512 28849 29371 0.982 Machine tool (metal cutting types) mfg 

# 3542 333513 14185 14185 1.000 Machine tool (metal forming types) mfg 

# 3543 332997 7959 7959 1.000 Industrial pattern mfg 

# 3544 333511 48657 48657 1.000 Industrial mold mfg 

# 3544 333514 80113 80113 1.000 Special die & tool, die set, jig, & fixture mfg 

# 3545 332212 6379 50388 0.127 Hand & edge tool mfg 

# 3545 333515 47925 47925 1.000 Cutting tool & machine tool accessory mfg 

# 3546 333991 16816 16816 1.000 Power-driven handtool mfg 

# 3547 333516 4149 4149 1.000 Rolling mill machinery & equipment mfg 

# 3548 335311 0 26638 0.000 Power, distribution, & specialty transformer

# SIC NAICS SIC Employees 1997 NAICS Employees ‘1997 Employee Fraction NAICS description

mfg 

# 3548 333992 22434 22505 0.997 Welding & soldering equipment mfg 

# 3549 333518 19023 19023 1.000 Other metalworking machinery mfg 

# 3552 333292 13600 13600 1.000 Textile machinery mfg 

# 3553 333210 9117 9117 1.000 Sawmill & woodworking machinery mfg 

# 3554 333291 18594 18594 1.000 Paper industry machinery mfg 

# 3555 333293 17500 21000 0.833 Printing machinery & equipment mfg 

# 3556 333294 19026 19026 1.000 Food product machinery mfg 

# 3559 333319 2890 56910 0.051 Other commercial & service industry machinery mfg 

# 3559 333220 18574 18574 1.000 Plastics & rubber industry machinery mfg 

# 3559 333295 40087 40087 1.000 Semiconductor machinery mfg 

# 3559 333298 53046 53106 0.999 All other industrial machinery mfg 

# 3561 333911 36552 36552 1.000 Pump & pumping equipment mfg 

# 3562 332991 36991 36991 1.000 Ball & roller bearing mfg 

# 3563 333912 24821 24821 1.000 Air & gas compressor mfg 

# 3564 333411 16183 16183 1.000 Air purification equipment mfg 

# 3564 333412 13723 13723 1.000 Industrial & commercial fan & blower mfg 

# 3565 333993 31581 31581 1.000 Packaging machinery mfg 

# 3566 333612 16231 16231 1.000 Speed changer, industrial high-speed drive, & gear mfg 

# 3567 333994 17585 17585 1.000 Industrial process furnace & oven mfg 

# 3568 333613 21604 21604 1.000 Mechanical power transmission equipment mfg 

# 3569 333999 50088 61151 0.819 All other miscellaneous general-purpose machinery mfg 

# 3571 334111 100115 100115 1.000 Electronic computer mfg 

# 3572 334112 42364 42364 1.000 Computer storage device mfg 

# 3575 334113 5764 5764 1.000 Computer terminal mfg 

# 3577 334119 87253 93970 0.929 Other computer peripheral equipment mfg 

# 3578 333313 966 14831 0.065 Office machinery mfg 

# 3578 334119 6717 93970 0.071 Other computer peripheral equipment mfg 

# 3579 333313 13865 14831 0.935 Office machinery mfg 

# 3579 334518 750 6333 0.118 Watch, clock, & part mfg 

# 3579 339942 1234 7990 0.154 Lead pencil & art good mfg 

# 3581 333311 8178 8178 1.000 Automatic vending machine mfg 

# 3582 333312 4523 4523 1.000 Commercial laundry, drycleaning, & pressing

# SIC NAICS SIC Employees 1997 NAICS Employees ‘1997 Employee Fraction NAICS description

machine mfg 

# 3585 333415 119456 119795 0.997 AC & warm air heating & commercial/industrial refrig equip mfg 

# 3585 336391 21522 21522 1.000 Motor vehicle air-conditioning mfg 

# 3586 333913 6824 6824 1.000 Measuring & dispensing pump mfg 

# 3589 333319 44172 56910 0.776 Other commercial & service industry machinery mfg 

# 3592 336311 17518 17518 1.000 Carburetor, piston, piston ring, & valve mfg 

# 3593 333995 23062 23062 1.000 Fluid power cylinder & actuator mfg 

# 3594 333996 15482 15482 1.000 Fluid power pump & motor mfg 

# 3596 333997 4871 4871 1.000 Scale & balance (except laboratory) mfg 

# 3599 332710 290951 290951 1.000 Machine shops 

# 3599 332999 4199 79070 0.053 All other miscellaneous fabricated metal product mfg 

# 3599 333319 1335 56910 0.023 Other commercial & service industry machinery mfg 

# 3599 333999 11063 61151 0.181 All other miscellaneous general-purpose machinery mfg Part of Misc. & Electronic Degreasing and Part of Electrical Insulation Surface Coating



# 3612 335311 26638 26638 1.000 Power, distribution, & specialty transformer mfg Part of Misc. & Electronic Degreasing



# 3613 335313 41291 41291 1.000 Switchgear & switchboard apparatus mfg 

# 3621 335312 71112 74666 0.952 Motor & generator mfg 

# 3624 335991 10887 10887 1.000 Carbon & graphite product mfg 

# 3625 335314 68365 68365 1.000 Relay & industrial control mfg 

# 3629 335999 18682 44754 0.417 All other miscellaneous electrical equipment & component mfg Part of Misc. & Electronic Degreasing and Appliance Surface Coating



# 3631 335221 17543 17543 1.000 Household cooking appliance mfg 

# 3632 335222 24597 24597 1.000 Household refrigerator & home freezer mfg 

# 3633 335224 14801 14801 1.000 Household laundry equipment mfg 

# 3634 333414 2171 24666 0.088 Heating equipment (except warm air furnaces) mfg 

# 3634 335211 17058 17058 1.000 Electric housewares & household fan mfg 

# 3635 335212 10537 10537 1.000 Household vacuum cleaner mfg 

# 3639 333298 60 53106 0.001 All other industrial machinery mfg 

# 3639 335212 0 10537 0.000 Household vacuum cleaner mfg

# SIC NAICS SIC Employees 1997 NAICS Employees ‘1997 Employee Fraction NAICS description



# 3639 335228 13309 13309 1.000 Other major household appliance mfg Part of Misc. & Electronic Degreasing



# 3641 335110 15903 15903 1.000 Electric lamp bulb & part mfg 

# 3643 335931 44907 44907 1.000 Current-carrying wiring device mfg 

# 3644 335932 23540 23540 1.000 Noncurrent-carrying wiring device mfg 

# 3645 335121 16395 17685 0.927 Residential electric lighting fixture mfg 

# 3646 335122 23090 23090 1.000 Commercial/industrial/institutional electric lighting fixture mfg 

# 3647 336321 16506 16506 1.000 Vehicular lighting equipment mfg 

# 3648 335129 18274 18282 1.000 Other lighting equipment mfg 

# 3651 334310 31727 31727 1.000 Audio & video equipment mfg 

# 3652 334612 16598 25554 0.650 Prerecorded CD (except software), tape, & record reproducing 

# 3661 334210 104262 104262 1.000 Telephone apparatus mfg 

# 3661 334416 63 19431 0.003 Electronic coil, transformer, & other inductor mfg 

# 3661 334418 6083 111054 0.055 Printed circuit assembly (electronic assembly) mfg 

# 3663 334220 148156 164461 0.901 Radio & TV broadcasting & wireless communications equipment mfg 

# 3669 334290 25187 25187 1.000 Other communications equipment mfg 

# 3671 334411 21976 21976 1.000 Electron tube mfg 

# 3672 334412 76702 76702 1.000 Bare printed circuit board mfg 

# 3674 334413 199497 199497 1.000 Semiconductor & related device mfg 

# 3675 334414 18882 18882 1.000 Electronic capacitor mfg 

# 3676 334415 11964 11964 1.000 Electronic resistor mfg 

# 3677 334416 19178 19431 0.987 Electronic coil, transformer, & other inductor mfg 

# 3678 334417 37232 37232 1.000 Electronic connector mfg 

# 3679 336322 12786 95491 0.134 Other motor vehicle electrical & electronic equipment mfg 

# 3679 334220 16305 164461 0.099 Radio & TV broadcasting & wireless communications equipment mfg 

# 3679 334418 104971 111054 0.945 Printed circuit assembly (electronic assembly) mfg 

# 3679 334419 92200 92200 1.000 Other electronic component mfg 

# 3691 335911 23288 23288 1.000 Storage battery mfg 

# 3692 335912 8917 8917 1.000 Primary battery mfg

# SIC NAICS SIC Employees 1997 NAICS Employees ‘1997 Employee Fraction NAICS description



# 3694 336322 52216 95491 0.547 Other motor vehicle electrical & electronic equipment mfg 

# 3695 334613 21345 21345 1.000 Magnetic & optical recording media mfg 

# 3699 333992 71 22505 0.003 Welding & soldering equipment mfg 

# 3699 335999 26072 44754 0.583 All other miscellaneous electrical equipment & component mfg 

# 3699 335129 8 18282 0.000 Other lighting equipment mfg 

# 3699 334519 29 33933 0.001 Other measuring & controlling device mfg 

# 3699 334516 159 38359 0.004 Analytical laboratory instrument mfg 

# 3699 334119 0 93970 0.000 Other computer peripheral equipment mfg 

# 3699 334510 542 54385 0.010 Electromedical & electrotherapeutic apparatus mfg 

# 3699 339114 0 18072 0.000 Dental equipment & supplies mfg 

# 3699 333512 522 29371 0.018 Machine tool (metal cutting types) mfg 

# 3699 333319 8513 56910 0.150 Other commercial & service industry machinery mfg 

# 3699 333315 0 24707 0.000 Photographic & photocopying equipment mfg 

# 3699 333314 56 20857 0.003 Optical instrument & lens mfg 

# 3699 333293 175 21000 0.008 Printing machinery & equipment mfg 

# 3699 333292 0 13600 0.000 Textile machinery mfg 

# 3699 332212 424 50388 0.008 Hand & edge tool mfg 

# 3699 334511 604 188161 0.003 Search, detection, navigation, & guidance instrument mfg 

# 3699 333618 10 56348 0.000 Other engine equipment mfg Part of Misc. Degreasing and New Automobile Surface Coating



# 3711 336992 375 5788 0.065 Military armored vehicle, tank, & tank component mfg 

# 3711 336111 114060 114060 1.000 Automobile mfg 

# 3711 336112 94033 94033 1.000 Light truck & utility vehicle mfg 

# 3711 336120 28214 28214 1.000 Heavy duty truck mfg 

# 3711 336211 404 43384 0.009 Motor vehicle body mfg Part of Misc. Degreasing and Part of Ot her Transportation Equipment Surface Coating 

# 3713 336211 41779 43384 0.963 Motor vehicle body mfg 

# 3714 336312 81368 81368 1.000 Gasoline engine & engine parts mfg 

# 3714 336322 30489 95491 0.319 Other motor vehicle electrical & electronic equipment mfg 

# 3714 336330 48944 48944 1.000 Motor vehicle steering & suspension component (except spring) mfg

# SIC NAICS SIC Employees 1997 NAICS Employees ‘1997 Employee Fraction NAICS description



# 3714 336340 43132 43132 1.000 Motor vehicle brake system mfg 

# 3714 336350 111954 111954 1.000 Motor vehicle transmission & power train parts mfg 

# 3714 336399 173569 174465 0.995 All other motor vehicle parts mfg 

# 3714 336211 1201 43384 0.028 Motor vehicle body mfg 

# 3715 336212 30678 30678 1.000 Truck trailer mfg 

# 3716 336213 18086 18086 1.000 Motor home mfg 

# 3721 336411 200961 200961 1.000 Aircraft mfg 

# 3724 336412 82557 82557 1.000 Aircraft engine & engine parts mfg 

# 3728 332912 0 37132 0.000 Fluid power valve & hose fitting mfg 

# 3728 336413 127729 127729 1.000 Other aircraft part & auxiliary equipment mfg 

# 3728 333995 0 23062 0.000 Fluid power cylinder & actuator mfg 

# 3728 333996 0 15482 0.000 Fluid power pump & motor mfg Part of Misc. Degreasing and Marine Surface Coating



# 3731 336611 97385 97385 1.000 Ship building & repairing 

# 3732 336612 41422 41422 1.000 Boat building 

# 3732 811490 9454 65213 0.145 Other personal & household goods repair & maintenance Part of Misc. Degreasing and Part of Othe r Transportation Equipment Surface Coating



# 3743 333911 0 36552 0.000 Pump & pumping equipment mfg 

# 3743 336510 31633 34012 0.930 Railroad rolling stock mfg 

# 3751 336991 17158 17218 0.997 Motorcycle, bicycle, & parts mfg 

# 3761 336414 52158 52158 1.000 Guided missile & space vehicle mfg 

# 3764 336415 18540 18540 1.000 Guided missile & space vehicle propulsion unit & parts mfg 

# 3769 336419 6110 6110 1.000 Other guided missile & space vehicle parts & auxiliary equip mfg 

# 3792 336214 20112 33352 0.603 Travel trailer & camper mfg 

# 3795 336992 5415 5788 0.936 Military armored vehicle, tank, & tank component mfg 

# 3799 336214 13240 33352 0.397 Travel trailer & camper mfg 

# 3799 336999 19466 19466 1.000 All other transportation equipment mfg 

# 3799 332212 60 50388 0.001 Hand & edge tool mfg Part of Misc. Degreasing



# 3812 334511 187557 188161 0.997 Search, detection, navigation, & guidance instrument mfg 

# 3821 339111 18253 18253 1.000 Laboratory apparatus & furniture mfg

# SIC NAICS SIC Employees 1997 NAICS Employees ‘1997 Employee Fraction NAICS description



# 3822 334512 21450 21450 1.000 Automatic environmental control mfg 

# 3823 334513 49196 49196 1.000 Industrial process control instrument mfg 

# 3824 334514 17390 17390 1.000 Totalizing fluid meter & counting device mfg 

# 3825 334416 190 19431 0.010 Electronic coil, transformer, & other inductor mfg 

# 3825 334515 63332 63332 1.000 Electricity measuring & testing instrument mfg 

# 3826 334516 38200 38359 0.996 Analytical laboratory instrument mfg 

# 3827 333314 20801 20857 0.997 Optical instrument & lens mfg 

# 3829 339112 521 107819 0.005 Surgical & medical instrument mfg 

# 3829 334519 33904 33933 0.999 Other measuring & controlling device mfg 

# 3841 339112 107298 107819 0.995 Surgical & medical instrument mfg 

# 3842 322121 375 120176 0.003 Paper (except newsprint) mills 

# 3842 322291 2236 21791 0.103 Sanitary paper product mfg 

# 3842 334510 6722 54385 0.124 Electromedical & electrotherapeutic apparatus mfg 

# 3842 339113 82390 85315 0.966 Surgical appliance & supplies mfg 

# 3843 339114 18072 18072 1.000 Dental equipment & supplies mfg 

# 3844 334517 14276 14276 1.000 Irradiation apparatus mfg 

# 3845 334510 47121 54385 0.866 Electromedical & electrotherapeutic apparatus mfg 

# 3851 339115 26366 26366 1.000 Ophthalmic goods mfg 

# 3861 325992 38935 38935 1.000 Photographic film, paper, plate, & chemical mfg 

# 3861 333315 24707 24707 1.000 Photographic & photocopying equipment mfg 

# 3873 334518 5646 6333 0.892 Watch, clock, & part mfg 

# 3911 339911 34694 34773 0.998 Jewelry (except costume) mfg 

# 3914 332211 101 11230 0.009 Cutlery & flatware (except precious) mfg 

# 3914 339912 6356 6459 0.984 Silverware & plated ware mfg 

# 3915 339913 5396 5396 1.000 Jewelers' material & lapidary work mfg 

# 3931 339992 13411 13411 1.000 Musical instrument mfg 

# 3942 339931 3393 3393 1.000 Doll & stuffed toy mfg 

# 3944 336991 60 17218 0.003 Motorcycle, bicycle, & parts mfg 

# 3944 339932 29622 29622 1.000 Game, toy, & children's vehicle mfg 

# 3949 339920 69664 69664 1.000 Sporting & athletic goods mfg 

# 3951 339941 8394 8394 1.000 Pen & mechanical pencil mfg 

# 3952 339942 5815 7990 0.728 Lead pencil & art good mfg

# SIC NAICS SIC Employees 1997 NAICS Employees ‘1997 Employee Fraction NAICS description



# 3952 337127 187 38218 0.005 Institutional furniture mfg 

# 3952 325998 0 35915 0.000 All other miscellaneous chemical product & preparation mfg 

# 3953 339943 7831 7831 1.000 Marking device mfg 

# 3955 339944 5923 5923 1.000 Carbon paper & inked ribbon mfg 

# 3961 339914 13976 14573 0.959 Costume jewelry & novelty mfg 

# 3965 339993 7500 7842 0.956 Fastener, button, needle, & pin mfg 

# 3991 339994 13882 16826 0.825 Broom, brush, & mop mfg 

# 3993 339950 82956 82956 1.000 Sign mfg 

# 3995 339995 6962 6962 1.000 Burial casket mfg 

# 3996 326192 5614 6070 0.925 Resilient floor covering mfg 

# 3999 323119 0 33016 0.000 Other commercial printing 

# 3999 337127 329 38218 0.009 Institutional furniture mfg 

# 3999 335121 1216 17685 0.069 Residential electric lighting fixture mfg



# 3999 332999 3231 79070 0.041 All other miscellaneous fabricated metal product mfg 

# 3999 332212 750 50388 0.015 Hand & edge tool mfg 

# 3999 326199 3141 526382 0.006 All other plastics product mfg 

# 3999 325998 572 35915 0.016 All other miscellaneous chemical product & preparation mfg 

# 3999 314999 2167 64480 0.034 All other miscellaneous textile product mills 

# 3999 323113 0 72221 0.000 Commercial screen printing 

# 3999 339999 60397 74137 0.815 All other miscellaneous mfg 

# 3999 316110 329 15317 0.021 Leather & hide tanning & finishing 

# 3999 321999 0 43839 0.000 All other miscellaneous wood product mfg 

# 3999 322299 0 24302 0.000 All other converted paper product mfg 

# 3999 323110 0 415117 0.000 Commercial lithographic printing 

# 3999 323111 0 23260 0.000 Commercial gravure printing 

# 3999 323112 0 30588 0.000 Commercial flexographic printing Part of Misc. Open Top Degreasing & Auto Repair Cold Cleaning



# 4173 488490 220 7480 0.029 Other support activities for road transportation 

# 4231 488490 120 7480 0.016 Other support activities for road transportation 

# 5511 441110 1046243 1046243 1.000 New car dealers 

# 5521 441120 92752 92752 1.000 Used car dealers 

# 5541 447190 69640 308105 0.226 Other gasoline stations

# SIC NAICS SIC Employees 1997 NAICS Employees ‘1997 Employee Fraction NAICS description



# 5541 447110 432935 613957 0.705 Gasoline stations with convenience stores 

# 5541 447190 238465 308105 0.774 Other gasoline stations 

# 5551 441222 35134 35134 1.000 Boat dealers 

# 5561 441210 29463 29463 1.000 Recreational vehicle dealers 

# 7532 811121 192853 205172 0.940 Automotive body, paint, & interior repair & maintenance 

# 7532 811121 6507 205172 0.032 Automotive body, paint, & interior repair & maintenance 

# 7532 811121 5812 205172 0.028 Automotive body, paint, & interior repair & maintenance 

# 7533 811112 23015 23015 1.000 Automotive exhaust system repair 

# 7534 811198 2991 14780 0.202 All other automotive repair & maintenance 

# 7534 326212 7939 7939 1.000 Tire retreading 

# 7536 811122 29187 29187 1.000 Automotive glass replacement shops 

# 7537 811113 29442 29442 1.000 Automotive transmission repair 

# 7538 811111 290634 290634 1.000 General automotive repair



# 7539 811118 3954 42234 0.094 Other automotive mechanical & electrical repair & maintenance 

# 7539 811118 4802 42234 0.114 Other automotive mechanical & electrical repair & maintenance 

# 7539 811118 18216 42234 0.431 Other automotive mechanical & electrical repair & maintenance 

# 7539 811118 6890 42234 0.163 Other automotive mechanical & electrical repair & maintenance 

# 7539 811118 8372 42234 0.198 Other automotive mechanical & electrical repair & maintenance Dry Cleaning



# 7215 812310 53023 53023 1.000 Dry cleaning, coin operated 

# 7216 812320 166208 203777 0.816 Dry cleaning, commercial

# Appendix F.3 On-Road Mobile Source Emissions Inventory Documentation

## On-Road Mobile Sources Documentation i The Hickory And Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC PM2.5 Appendix F.3 North Carolina Attainment Demonstration August 21, 2009 

# (This page intentionally left blank)

## On-Road Mobile Sources Documentation ii The Hickory And Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC PM2.5 Appendix F.3 North Carolina Attainment Demonstration August 21, 2009 

# TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... ........1 2. MOBILE6.2 INPUT ASSUMPTIONS FOR EMISSIONS MODELING ..................................2 2.1 Speed Assumptions ...................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Vehicle Age Distribution ............................................................................................. 3 2.3 Vehicle Mix Assumptions............................................................................................ 4 2.3.1 North Carolina Statewide Vehicle Mix Development .................................. 4 2.4 Temperature, Relative Humidity and Barometric Pressure Assumptions ................. 10 2.5 Vehicle Inspection and Mainte nance Program Assumptions .................................... 10 2.6 Reid Vapor Pressure Assumptions............................................................................. 11 2.7 Vehicle Miles Traveled Assumptions ........................................................................ 11 2.8 Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content Assumptions ................................................................... 12 3. QUALITY ASSURANCE MEASURES ...................................................................................12 4. MOBILE6.2 INPUTS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS BUDGETS ............................13 4.1 Speed Assumptions .................................................................................................... 14 4.2 Vehicle Age Distribution ........................................................................................... 15 4.3 Development of Vehicle Mix..................................................................................... 15 4.4 Temperature Assumptions ......................................................................................... 17 4.5 Vehicle Inspection and Mainte nance Program Assumptions .................................... 18 4.6 Reid Vapor Pressure Assumptions............................................................................. 19 4.7 Vehicle Miles Traveled Assumptions ........................................................................ 19 4.8 Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content Assumptions ................................................................... 20
5. MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS BUDGETS FOR CONFORMITY ....................................20 5.1 Transportation Conformity ........................................................................................ 20
5.2 Pollutants to be Considered ....................................................................................... 21 5.2.1 Precursor Pollutants NOx, VOC and Ammonia ......................................... 22
5.2.2 Reentrained Road Dust ............................................................................... 22
5.2.3 Precursor Pollutant SO 2 

# .............................................................................. 23 5.3 Highway Mobile Source Direct PM 2.5 

# Emssions ....................................................... 25 5.3.1 Insignificance of Primary PM 2.5 

# Emissions ................................................ 26
5.3.2 PM 25 

# and NOx Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets ..................................... 30
6. MOBILE6.2 DATA USED IN SETTING MVEBs ..................................................................32 6.1 MOBILE6.2 Input Files for PM2.5 and NOx ............................................................ 32 6.1.1 Input Files for PM2.5 .................................................................................. 32 6.1.1.1 Catawba County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Input File for PM2.5 ...................... 32

## On-Road Mobile Sources Documentation iii The Hickory And Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC PM2.5 Appendix F.3 North Carolina Attainment Demonstration August 21, 2009 

# 6.1.1.2 Davidson County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Input File for PM2.5 ..................... 37 6.1.1.3 Guilford County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Input File for PM2.5 ....................... 43 6.1.2 2009 MOBILE6.2 Input Files for NOx....................................................... 46 6.1.2.1 Catawba County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Input Files for NOx ........................ 46 6.1.2.2 Davidson County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Input Files for NOx ...................... 84 6.1.2.3 Guilford County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Input File for Nox ........................ 133 6.2 MOBILE6.2 Output Files ........................................................................................ 160 6.2.1 2009 Mobile6.2 Output Files for PM2.5 ................................................... 160 6.2.1.1 Catawba County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Output File for PM2.5 .................. 160 6.2.1.2 Davidson County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Output File for PM2.5 ................ 173 6.2.1.3 Guilford County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Output Files for PM2.5 ................ 190 6.2.2 2009 MOBILE6.2 Output Files for NOx .................................................. 198 6.2.2.1 Catawba County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Output Files for NOx ................... 198 6.2.2.2 Davidson County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Output Files for NOx .................. 272 6.2.2.3 Guilford County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Output Files for NOx ................... 370
6.3 2009 State Vehicle Mix ........................................................................................... 421
6.3.1 2009 State Vehicle Mix for PM2.5 using 2006 count data ....................... 421 6.3.2 2009 State Vehicle Mix for NOx using 2007 count data .......................... 421 6.4 2005 Vehicle Age Distribution Files used for PM2.5.............................................. 422 6.4.1 2005 Triad Vehicle Age Distribution File Used for Guilford County ...... 422 6.4.2 2005 NC Vehicle Age Distribution Fi le Used for Catawba and Davidson Counties used for PM2.5..................................................................................... 425 6.5 2007 Vehicle Age Distribution Files used for NOx ................................................. 426 6.5.1 2007 Triad Vehicle Age Distributi on File Used for Guilford County NOx ............................................................................................................................. 4 26 6.5.2 2007 Triad Vehicle Age Distribution File Used for Catawba and Davidson Counties NOx...................................................................................................... 428

## On-Road Mobile Sources Documentation iv The Hickory And Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC PM2.5 Appendix F.3 North Carolina Attainment Demonstration August 21, 2009 

# LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.3.1-1 1999-2001 Percent Vehicles by FHWA Vehicle Class by Functional Classification................................................................................................................. ...................5 Table 2.3.1-2. Calculation of New 2000 Stat ewide Rural Interstate Vehicle Mix ........................ 8 Table 2.3.1-3. Calculation of 2009 NC Statew ide Rural Interstate Vehicle Mix ......................... 10 Table 4.1-1. 2009 Daily Speeds Used to Calculate the MVEBs .................................................. 14 Table 4.3-1. 2006 Percent Vehicles by FHWA Vehi cle Class by Functional Classification ....... 16 Table 4.4-1. 2002 Catawba C ounty Temperatures ....................................................................... 17 Table 4.4-2. 2002 Davidson and Guilfor d Counties Temperatures .............................................. 17 Table 4.5. 2009 County-level I/M Fractions ................................................................................. 18 Table 4.6. Quarterly RVP Used to Calculate NOx MVEBs ......................................................... 19 Table 4.7-1. 2009 Daily VMT Used to Calculate the MVEBs ..................................................... 20 Table 5.3.2-1. County Level PM 2.5 

# Highway Mobile Emissions for 2009 ................................... 30 Table 5.3.2-2. County Level NO X 

# Highway Mobile Emissions for 2009 .................................... 31 Table 5.3.2-3. County Level PM 25 

# MVEBs for 2009 ................................................................... 31 Table 5.3.2-4. County Level NOx MVEBs for 2009 .................................................................... 31

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 5.3.1-1. Hickory Area 2009 Primary PM 2.5 

# Emissions ..................................................... 26 Figure 5.3.1-2. Triad Area 2009 Primary PM 2.5 

# Emissions ......................................................... 26 Figure 5.3.1-3. Catawba County Hourly PM 25 

# Emissions ............................................................ 28 Figure 5.3.1-4. Davidson County Hourly PM 25 

# Emissions .......................................................... 28 Figure 5.3.1-5. Guilford County Hourly PM 25 

# Emissions ............................................................ 29

## On-Road Mobile Sources Documentation v The Hickory And Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC PM2.5 Appendix F.3 North Carolina Attainment Demonstration August 21, 2009 

# (This page intentionally left blank)

# 1. INTRODUCTION
The attainment modeling for the Hickory (Cat awba County) and the Triad (Davidson and Guilford Counties) fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 

# ) nonattainment areas were performed in conjunction with the regional haze modeling be ing done by the Southeast Regional Planning Organization, Visibility Improveme nt State and Tribal Associati on of the Southeast (VISTAS) and the fine particulate matter and particul ate modeling being done by the Association of Southeastern Integrated Planning (ASIP). VISTAS and ASIP are run by the ten southeast states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississipp i, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia). The North Caro lina Division of Air Qua lity (NCDAQ) decided to use this modeling for its attainment demonstra tion since the modeling uses annual simulations and includes the intermedia te year 2009, which is the attainment year for PM 2.5 

# .

On-road mobile sources are those vehicles that travel on the highways and the roadways. Onroad mobile sources emissions comprise a small percentage of the total particulate for all of North Carolina. Particulate emissions from mo tor vehicles only occur while the vehicle is moving or idling. These emissions are direct tailpipe (both gas and diesel), sulfate, tire wear, and brake wear. Only direct partic ulate emissions processes will be estimated in order to properly reflect the total particulate emissions from this source category. In its simplest terms, emissions from on-road mobile sources are calculated by multip lying an activity level, in this case daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as provided by th e North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and Metropolitan Planning Organi zation (MPOs), by an emission factor.

The US Environmental Protection Agency (USE PA) developed the MOBILE model to estimate emission factors based on information on the way ve hicles are driven in a particular area. The newest version of the MOBILE model, MO BILE6.2, was used. In 2004, MOBILE6.2 was incorporated into SMOKEv2.1, which was used in the VISTAS/ASIP modeling. Key inputs for MOBILE6.2 include information on the age of vehi cles on the roads, the average speed of those vehicles, what types of roads those vehicles are traveling on, any control t echnologies in place in an area that reduce emissions for motor vehi cles (e.g., emissions inspection programs), and ambient temperature and humidity.

MOBILE6.2 particulate outputs cont ain both primary particulates (soot from tailpipes, tire, and brake wear) and secondary (particulate precursors). Seconda ry particulate matter is formed by chemical reactions of gas-phase precursors in the atmosphere (FR Vol.70, No. 210, p65992). The specific primary outputs are GASPM, i.e. particles directly emitted from all gasoline vehicles, OCARBON (organic carbon) and ECARB ON (elemental carbon) from diesel engines, (sulfate) SO 4 

# from both fuels, and tire a nd brake dust from all vehicles.

# A very important component of the on-road mob ile emissions estimation process is interagency consultation. The transportation partners involved in this Stat e Implementation Plan (SIP) and development of the motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) included: USEPA, NCDOT, Federal Highway Administrati on (FHWA), Greater Hickory (MPO), Unifour Rural Planning Organization (RPO), Piedmont Triad RPO, Greensboro MPO, High Point MPO, and the Burlington-Graham MPO. Specifi cally, the NCDOT and the MPOs were consulted on input data such as speeds and VMT derived from the travel demand model (TDM).

The documentation for the on-road mobile sour ces is broken out into two components:

1) how the inventory was developed for the par ticulate matter emissions modeling used for the attainment demonstration and,

2) how the motor vehicle emissions budgets were developed for the three North Carolina counties that comprise the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment areas.



# 2. MOBILE6.2 INPUT ASSUMPTI ONS FOR EMISSIONS MODELING

The MOBILE6.2 module of SMOKE was used to develop the 2009 on-ro ad mobile source emissions estimates for fine particulate matte r. The MOBILE6.2 parameters, vehicle fleet descriptions, and VMT estimates were combined w ith gridded, episode-specific temperature data to calculate the gridded, temporalized emissi on estimates. Of note, whereas the on-network emissions estimates are spatially allocated ba sed on link location and s ubsequently summed to the grid cell level, the off-network emissions estimates are spatially allocated based on a combination of the FHWA Version 2.0 highw ay networks and population. For the VISTAS/ASIP 36/12 km modeling, no link base d data was used. The MOBILE6.2 emission factors are based on episode-specific temperatur es predicted by the meteorological model. Furthermore, the MOBILE6.2 emission factor model accounts for the following:

• Daily minimum/maximum or 24 hourly temperatures;

• Facility speeds;

• Locale-specific inspection/maintenance (I/M) control programs, if any;

• VMT, fleet turnover, and changes in fuel composition and Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP).

# 2.1 Speed Assumptions

Emissions from motor vehicles vary with the ma nner in which the vehicle is operated. Vehicles traveling at 65 miles per hour (mph) emit a very different mix and concen trations of pollutants than the car that is idling at a stoplight. In orde r to estimate emissions from vehicles for a typical day, NCDOT and the MPOs provided speed s for their respect ive counties.

The speeds for several urban counties covered by the MPOs were generated from their latest travel demand models (TDMs) at the time emissions modeling began. NCDOT recommended using Wake County off-peak speeds for all remain ing counties in North Carolina not covered by TDMs.

Interstates are modeled as “non-ramp” instead of “freeways” because both speed and VMT for ramps are included in the functional classification fo r the major facility it is connected to in the TDM. This is consistent with the USEPA guidance.

2.2 Vehicle Age Distribution

The vehicle age distribution is based on annual registration da ta for North Carolina and is provided by NCDOT. For this analysis the ag e distribution was generated based on 2005 data, representing the latest qualit y assured information available. The NCDOT provided vehicle count data for each vehicle classification fr om years 1974 and prior through 2005. Vehicles greater than 25 years old were combined and included as the 25 th 

# model year. The vehicle count information is provided for nine vehicle types; light duty gas vehicles (LDGV), light duty diesel vehicles (LDDV), light duty gas trucks 1 (LDGT1), light duty gas trucks 2 (LDGT2), light duty diesel trucks 1 (LDDT1), light duty diesel tr ucks 2 (LDDT2), heavy dut y gas vehicles (HDGV), heavy duty diesel vehicles ( HDDV) and motorcycles (MC). L DDT1 and LDDT2 are combined and labeled as light duty diesel trucks (LDDT). This vehicle distribution convention corresponds to the old MOBILE5 format and does not corr elate to the USEPA MOBILE6.2 model vehicle types. In order to convert the data provide d by the NCDOT into the MOBILE6.2 model format, the NCDAQ used a utility developed by the US EPA that disaggregates the 8 MOBILE5 model vehicle types into the 16 MOBILE6.2 vehicle types. The count data provided by the NCDOT is converted into fractions by dividing each count per vehicle type per year by the total number of vehicles in that classification fo r all years. For example, the nu mber of 2005 light duty vehicles divided by the total number of light duty vehicles for all years. The fractions are arranged into MOBILE5 format for conversion to the 16 ve hicle types required by the MOBILE6.2 model using the USEPA conversion utility.

# 2.3 Vehicle Mix Assumptions

2.3.1 North Carolina Statewide Vehicle Mix Development The vehicle mix refers to the percentage of di fferent vehicle types on each of the 12 FHWA road types. These road types are listed below in Ta ble 2.3.1-1. It is critical when estimating mobile emissions in an area to use data that accurately reflects the vehicle t ypes traveling on each of these different road types.

# The NCDAQ created a statewid e mix based on the methodology outlined in the August 2004 USEPA guidance document EPA420-R-04-013 , Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6.2 for Emission Inventory Preparation

. Below is the methodology us ed to convert the 13 Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) vehicl e types count data reported to FHWA to generate a state specific vehicle mix.

The North Carolina HPMS data that was used to generate the statewide vehicle mix was based on 1999 through 2001 data counts. This was the late st available statewide count information at the time of the emissions modeling. Table 2.3.1-1 s hows the percent of vehi cles per vehicle type for each of the 12 road classes.

Disaggregating State Specific Information

The Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE 6.2 for Emission Inventory Preparation , Section 4.1.5, illustrates how to map the HPMS statewide ve hicle data to general vehicle categories. This mapping is outlined below:

HPMS Category General Category Motorcycle Motorcycle (MC) Passenger Car Passenger Car (LDV) Other 2-Axel, 4-Tire Vehicles Light Truck (LDT)

Buses Bus (HDB)

All Other Trucks: Single unit, 2-axel, 6-tire Single unit, 3-axel Single unit, 4 or more axel Single trailer, 4 or fewer axel Single trailer, 5-axel Single trailer, 6 or more axel Multi-trailer, 5 or fewer axel Multi-trailer, 6-axel Multi-trailer, 7 or more axel Heavy Duty Truck (HDV)



# The HPMS data in Table 2.3.1-1 was grouped into these five general categories for each road type. In order to expand the five general cat egories to the 16 vehicle types used in MOBILE6.2,

# the national average VMT fractions by each vehi cle class were used. The 2000 fractions were used since the state specific data is fro m 1999 through 2001. The national average data was obtained from Table 4.1.2 in Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6.2 for Emission Inventory Preparation . An example for rural inters tates is illustrated below:

From Table 2.3.1-1 above:
Passenger Cars = 56.93% 5 axel Trailer = 19.23% Pickup Trucks = 10.80% 6 axel Trailer = 0.48% Buses = 1.06% 5 axel Multi Trailer = 0.73% 2 axel Trucks = 2.50% 6 axel Multi Trailer = 0.24% 3 axel Trucks = 1.56% 7 axel Multi Trailer = 0.11% 4 axel Trucks = 1.09% Motorcycles = 0.49% 4 axel Trailer = 4.79%

Therefore, the five general categories are: Motorcycles = 0.49% Light Duty Vehicles = 56.93% Light Duty Trucks = 10.80% Heavy Duty Buses = 1.06% Heavy Duty Vehicles = 30.73%

From Table 4.1.2 in Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6.2 for Emission Inventory Preparation , the 2000 national average vehicle mix for light duty trucks, buses and heavy duty trucks are:

Light Duty Trucks Heavy Duty Trucks LDT1 = 0.0655 LDT2 = 0.2179 LDT3 = 0.0672 LDT4 = 0.0309 Total = 0.3815

Buses HDV2B = 0.0380 HDV3 = 0.0038 HDV4 = 0.0029 HDV5 = 0.0022 HDV6 = 0.0082 HDV7 = 0.0098 HDV8A = 0.0108 HDV8B = 0.0386 Total = 0.1143 HDBS = 0.0019 HDBT = 0.0009 Total = 0.0028

# Using the methodology described in Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6.2 for Emission Inventory Preparation , Section 4.1.5, the 2000 North Carolin a statewide mix was developed. The basic formula for developing the mix is shown below,

Vehicle Type = (2000 M6.2 fraction for vehicle) X (99-01 State total for group)

. (2000 M6.2 total for subcategory)



# Table 2.3.1-2 displays the calculation for each vehi cle type for the 2000 rural interstate vehicle mix.

Table 2.3.1-2. Calculation of New 2000 Stat ewide Rural Interstate Vehicle Mix Vehicle

Type Calculation New 2000 Mix LDV = LDV = 0.5693 MC = MC = 0.0049
Light Duty Trucks LDT1 = 0.0655 x (0.1080/0.3815) = 0.0185 LDT2 = 0.2179 x (0.1080/0.3815) = 0.0617 LDT3 = 0.0672 x (0.1080/0.3815) = 0.0190 LDT4 = 0.0309 x (0.1080/0.3815) = 0.0087 Total Light Duty Vehicles 0.6822

Heavy Duty Vehicles HDV2B = 0.0380 x (0.3073/0.1143) = 0.1022 HDV3 = 0.0038 x (0.3073/0.1143) = 0.0102 HDV4 = 0.0029 x (0.3073/0.1143) = 0.0078 HDV5 = 0.0022 x (0.3073/0.1143) = 0.0059 HDV6 = 0.0082 x (0.3073/0.1143) = 0.0220 HDV7 = 0.0098 x (0.3073/0.1143) = 0.0263 HDV8A = 0.0108 x (0.3073/0.1143) = 0.0290 HDV8B = 0.0386 x (0.3073/0.1143) = 0.1038

Buses HDBS = 0.0019 x (0.0106/0.0028) = 0.0072 HDBT = 0.0009 x (0.0106/0.0028) = 0.0034 Total Heavy Duty Vehicles 0.3178

# 2009 Statewide Vehicle Mix Once the 2000 vehicle mix was generated, the ot her years were created using the methodology described in Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6.2 for Emission Inventory Preparation
, Section 4.1.4. This method grouped light duty ve hicles(light duty trucks and motorcycles) together and heavy duty vehicles (heavy duty buses and heavy duty trucks) together. The combined percentages for these groupings are listed below.

Light Duty Vehicles = 68.22% Heavy Duty Vehicles = 31.78%

The MOBILE6.2 vehicle mix fractions for the year being developed were obtained from Table 4.1.2 in Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE 6.2 for Emission Inventory Preparation . The MOBILE6.2 vehicle fractions for 2009 are listed below.

Light Duty Vehicles Heavy Duty Vehicles

The North Carolina 2009 vehicle mix was norma lized to the MOBILE6.2 fractions using the following formula:

Vehicle Type = (2009 M6 fraction for vehicle) X (2000 State total for group) (2009 M6 total for group)



# Table 2.3.1-3 below displays the calculations used to generate the 2009 North Carolina vehicle mix for rural interstate. HDV2B = 0.0389 HDV3 = 0.0038 HDV4 = 0.0032 HDV5 = 0.0024 HDV6 = 0.0087 HDV7 = 0.0103 HDV8A = 0.0112 HDV8B = 0.0398 HDBS = 0.0020 HDBT = 0.0010
Total = 0.1213 LDV = 0.3669 LDT1 = 0.0869 LDT2 = 0.2894 LDT3 = 0.0892 LDT4 = 0.0410 MC = 0.0054
Total = 0.8788

# Table 2.3.1-3. Calculation of 2009 NC Statew ide Rural Interstate Vehicle Mix Vehicle

Type Calculation 2009 State Mix

Light Duty Vehicles LDV = 0.3669 x (0.6822/0.8788) = 0.2848 LDT1 = 0.0869 x (0.6822/0.8788) = 0.0675 LDT2 = 0.2894 x (0.6822/0.8788) = 0.2247 LDT3 = 0.0892 x (0.6822/0.8788) = 0.0692 LDT4 = 0.0410 x (0.6822/0.8788) = 0.0318 MC = 0.0054 x (0.6822/0.8788) 0.0042

Heavy Duty Vehicles HDV2B = 0.0389 x (0.3178/0.1213) = 0.1019 HDV3 = 0.0038 x (0.3178/0.1213) = 0.0100 HDV4 = 0.0032 x (0.3178/0.1213) = 0.0084
HDV5 = 0.0024 x (0.3178/0.1213) = 0.0063 HDV6 = 0.0087 x (0.3178/0.1213) = 0.0228
HDV7 = 0.0103 x (0.3178/0.1213) = 0.0270 HDV8A = 0.0112 x (0.3178/0.1213) = 0.0293 HDV8B = 0.0398 x (0.3178/0.1213) = 0.1043 HDBS = 0.0020 x (0.3178/0.1213) = 0.0052
HDBT = 0.0010 x (0.3178/0.1213) = 0.0026

2.4 Temperature, Relative Humidity and Barometric Pressure Assumptions

Although, MOBILE6.2 PM 2.5 

# emission factors used by SMOKE are not significantly influenced by temperature and humidity, the other pollutants that are needed for one atmosphere modeling, such as nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds, are influenced by temperature and humidity. Therefore, the most desirable approach is to model on-road mobile emissions using gridded, temporalized data from the meteorol ogical model. The VISTAS on-road mobile inventories were developed using this approach.

2.5 Vehicle Inspection and Main tenance Program Assumptions

In the early 1990’s, North Carolina adopted emissi ons inspection requirements for vehicles in 9 urban counties. This program tested emissions at idle for 1975 and newer gasoline powered light duty vehicles. This “idle test” was assumed to have a compliance rate of 95 percent and covered

# Gaston, Mecklenburg, Union, Cabarrus, Forsyth, Guilf ord, Orange, Durham and Wake Counties. In addition, the insp ection stations are required to administer an anti-tampering check to ensure that emissions control equipment installed origin ally are on the vehicle and that the equipment has not been altered.

In 2002, North Carolina implemented a new vehicle emissions inspection program referred to as onboard diagnostics (OBD-II). This program covers all light duty gasoline powered vehicles that are model year 1996 and newer. The program was initially implemented in the 9 counties that originally had the “idle test” and was expanded to include a total of 48 counties between July 2002 and January 2006. Because the OBD-II progr am did not begin until midway through 2002, the 2002 annual on-road mobile inventory to support VI STAS/ASIP modeling was developed with the “idle test” only in the 9 counties listed above in addition to th e anti-tampering in all counties. By 2009 the OBD-II program will be fully implemented resulting in all three nonattainment counties, Catawba, Davidson, and Guilford, to be subject to the OBD-II I/M program. In addition, the inspection stations are required to administer an anti-tampering check to ensure that emissions control equipment on a ny vehicle 35 model years old and newer has not been altered.

2.6 Reid Vapor Pressure Assumptions

The RVP is a measure of gasoline’s volatility. An RVP of 7.8 pounds per square inch (psi) is required during May through September in the form er 1-hour ozone nonattainment areas, which includes Guilford and Davidson Counties. The rema inder of North Carolina is required to have an RVP of 9.0 psi, used in Catawba County, dur ing May through September. For the months of October, November, February, March and April, the RVP is 13.5 psi. The RVP in January and December is 15.0 psi.

2.7 Vehicle Miles Traveled Assumptions

In order to calculate emissions from on-road mo bile sources, emission factors are developed as discussed throughout this document. The emissi on factors are then multiplied by an activity level, which for on-road mobile sources is VMT.

For most counties in North Carolina, th e 2002 VMT was derived from the 2002 Highway Performance Maintenance System (HPMS) da ta provided by NCDOT and the 2009 was grown based on a linear interpolation of the most recent 10 years (1995-2004) of HPMS data. Similar to the speed data explained above, VMT from se veral urban counties TDMs were used instead of

# HPMS VMT. Where travel demand model data wa s available, it was the recommendation of the North Carolina transportation partners to use it instead of the HPMS data.

In situations where certain North Carolina coun ties are partially covered by a travel demand model, and the North Carolina tran sportation partners anticipate fu ture versions of the travel models to cover the entire c ounty, an adjusted HPMS VMT number was used. This upward adjustment (30%) of the countywide HPMS VMT data is based on an analysis by NCDAQ that shows that travel demand model VMT can be as much as 30% higher than the HPMS VMT.

2.8 Diesel Fuel Sulfu r Content Assumptions

The diesel fuel sulfur content is required in MOBILE6.2 to generate PM 2.5 

# emission factors because the amount of sulfur in di esel fuel directly correlates to sulfate particulate emissions. For the emissions modeling, the diesel sulfur content is 500 parts per million (ppm) in 2002 and 43 ppm in 2009. The same diesel sulfur content is used for all of the nonattainment counties. These values come from Section 5.5 in Tec hnical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6.2 for Emission Inventory Preparation . Office of Transportation an d Air Quality (OTAQ) was contacted prior to this submi ssion to verify that there wa s no update to this guidance.



# 3. QUALITY ASSURANCE MEASURES
The Quality Assurance (QA) of the data is one of the most important steps in performing an air quality modeling study. Because emissions inve ntory development is tedious, time consuming and involves complex manipulati on of many different types of large data sets, errors are frequently made and, if rigorous QA measures are not in place, these errors may remain undetected. For the on-road mobile source catego ry, QA can be broken into two components: 1) input files/data, and 2) SM OKE outputs/summaries. On-r oad mobile input data QA is summarized below. SMOKE output QA is summarized in Appendix H.1 of this document for all source categories.

On-road mobile input data was collected from the NCDOT and specific MPOs throughout North Carolina. The NCDAQ checked the speed informa tion for reasonableness against previous sets of speeds for that specific ar ea. Additionally, the following da ta elements are checked for accuracy in the input files prior to use in the modeling: pollutants, fuel RVP, I/M program settings, anti-tampering program settings, calendar year, evalua tion month. All input files are printed and checked by hand against a “key” with the original source of the information. This QA step is always performed by a person other th an the one who generated the files. If any discrepancies are found, they are marked on the hard copy supplied by to the person who

# generated the input files for corre ction. Vehicle age distribution is another input referenced in the actual MOBILE6.2 input file. This file is checked against the original spreadsheet from which it is generated. Again, if any discrepancies are found, they are noted and returned to the person responsible for generating those files. VMT and vehicle mix (also referred to as VMT mix) are additional data elements that are check ed after they are formatted for SMOKE. This file is checked against the original source of the VMT and VMT mix data.



# 4. MOBILE6.2 INPUTS FOR MO TOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS BUDGETS
The purpose of transportation conformity is to ensure that Federal transportation actions occurring in a nonattainment areas does not hi nder the area from main taining the annual PM 2.5 

# standard. This means that the level of emissi ons estimated by the NCDOT or the MPOs for the Transportation Implementation Plan and Long Ra nge Transportation Plan must not exceed the motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) as defi ned in this attainment demonstration SIP.

The sections below describe the MOBILE6.2 input assumptions used to calculate the MVEBs. The MOBILE6.2 input files and outp ut files used in the develo pment of the on-road mobile source emissions for the attainment demonstration are compiled in Section 6.

MOBILE6.2 is insensitive to temperatures, RV P, and inspection and maintenance commands when calculating PM 2.5 

# emission factors

. 

# The NCDAQ has decided to model a typical summer day for the MVEBs and multiply the resu lting emissions by 365 to get annual PM 2.5 

# emissions.

In our coordinated planning phase for the PM 2.5 SI P, all of the partners came forward with their individual planning data/assumptions to be used in the developmen t of the SIP. These data were the most current data at that time and in cluded road types, speeds, VMT, I&M data, meteorological data, etc. These data were to be used in Mobile6.2 by NCDAQ to obtain emission factors and to set budgets if required.

Since the SIP submittal deadline in April 2008, th e vehicle age distribution has a 2007 update that is now available. 2007 accident data has become available to update the I/M fraction for 2009. Additionally, 2007 counts used for the vehicle-mix have become available. The NCDAQ consulted with partners as to the use of the ne w data, which does not significantly change from that used in the SIP modeling.

The NCDAQ used quarterly NOx emission estimates based on the relative data pertinent to each quarter. Mobile6.2 is limited to two months, Ja nuary and July 2002. The first quarter was designated 1 for January. The second and third quar ters will be designated 7 for July. The forth

# quarter was designated as 1 for January of th e following year as recommended by the USEPA guidance document Technical Guidance on th e Use of MOBILE6.2 for Emission Inventory Preparation (USEPA, August 2004). Meteorological data is from the Triad Regional Airport for Davidson and Guilford counties. Data for Catawba County is from the Hickory ai rport. Averages are determined for RVP for each quarter per county. I&M fraction is calcul ated from annual accident data used as a surrogate for the percentage of cars on the road in each county during the year with and without I&M. Our most current accident data was from 2007.

4.1 Speed Assumptions

The MOBILE6.2 command “AVEAGE SPEED” was used to enter the daily speeds. This command requires the average speed on a given roadway scenario.

In order to estimate emissions from vehicles for a typical day, NCDOT and the MPOs provided speeds for their respective counties. The speeds were generated fr om their latest travel demand model. The speeds provided are based on a daily average.

Updated speed data was available at the tim e the MVEBs were developed. Although this updated data may be different from what was modeled in the attainment demonstration, the differences were not significant and will not result in different attainment test results.

Table 4.1-1 below provides a summary of the upda ted speeds used for the development of the MVEBs. The column headings in Table 4.1-1 re present the 12 FHWA road types used in the modeling and are listed below. The 12 FHWA road types are:

RI Rural Interstate UI Urban Interstate RPA Rural Other Principle Arterial UF Urban Freeway & Expressway RMA Rural Minor Arterial UPA Urban Other Principal Arterial RMjC Rural Major Collector UMiA Urban Minor Arterial RMiC Rural Minor Collector UC Urban Collector RL Rural Local UL Urban Local

Table 4.1-1. 2009 Daily Speeds Used to Calculate the MVEBs
County RI RPA RMA RMjC RMiC RL UI UF UPA UMiA UC UL
Catawba TDM 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 57 27 29 33 29 Catawba Non-TDM 66 47 44 43 42 42 63 56 29 32 31 31

## Davidson TDM 68 60 44 44 48 46 66 52 40 40 37 43 Davidson Non-TDM 65 44 43 43 42 42 62 56 28 32 31 32 Guilford TDM 59 57 45 47 46 44 60 54 40 38 38 37


# 4.2 Vehicle Age Distribution

The vehicle age distribution used in developing the MVEBs is not th e same as what was used in the VISTAS/ASIP modeling. The NCDOT supplie d updated vehicle age distribution based on 2005 vehicle count data on May 1, 2007, after th e emissions modeling was completed. The vehicle age distribution used in the emissions modeling was base d on 2004 vehicle count data. A MOBILE6.2 run was performed to determine if there is any difference between the two data sets. There was minimal difference in the emi ssion factors, therefore, the NCDAQ utilized the 2005 vehicle age distribution to establish the MV EBs for PM2.5 because it was the most up-todate data available at the time of PM2.5 emission modeling.

For NOx budgets developed in fall 2008, NCDAQ calculated a vehicle ag e distribution based on the most current 2007 count data supplied by NCDOT in June 2008. This newer age distribution was not seen to vary much from the 2005 distribution.

4.3 Development of Vehicle Mix

The vehicle mix used to proj ect the MVEBs for PM2.5 is developed from 2006 vehicle counts data provided by the NCDOT Division of Mo tor Vehicles on May 1, 2007. The MVEBs are calculated using the updated vehicle mix since it is the most up-to-dat e data available and sensitivity runs performed using MOBILE6.2 show very little difference between the vehicle mix used in the emissions modeling, which is based on 1999-2001 vehicle count data, and the updated data provided for 2006.

The same methodology used to derive the vehicl e mix as described in Section 2.3 was employed to derive the vehicle mix based on the 2006 vehicl e count data. The updated vehicle counts data can be found in Table 4.3-1.

For NOx budgets developed in fall 2008, NCDAQ calculated a vehicle mix based on 2007 count data supplied by NCDOT in June 2008. This newe r age distribution was not seen to vary much from the 2006 count data.Table 4.3-1. 2006 Percent Vehicles by FHWA Vehicle Class by Functional Classification

# 4.4 Temperature Assumptions

Since the PM 2.5 

# emission factors are not sensitive to temperature, the MOBILE6.2 command “MIN MAX TEMPERATURES” was used to enter temperatures to estimate mobile source emissions for particulate matter. For the nonatt ainment area, the NCDAQ used the 2002 annual minimum/maximum temperature profile from the Triad Airport Meteorological Station for Guilford and Davidson Counties. The Hickory Ai rport 2002 data was used for Catawba County.

Table 4.4-1. 2002 Catawba County Temperatures Annual average MIN/MAX Temperatures 49 o 

# F 70 o 

# F

Table 4.4-2. 2002 Davidson and Guilford Counties Temperatures Annual average MIN/MAX Temperatures 50 o 

# F 70 o 

# F

NOx emission factors are sensitive to temperatur e and relative humidity. Hourly average for temperature and relative humidity were calculated for each of the four quarters. Meteorological data is from the Hickory Air port for Catawba County. Data fo r Davidson and Guilford counties is from the Triad Regional airport.

Temperatures Catawba County First Q 37.8 36.8 37.2 40.6 44.1 47.8 50.3 52.6 53.8 54.7 54.8 54.0 51.5 49.3 47.8 46.4 44.8 44.1 42.8 41.5 40.5 40.2 39.6 38.6 Second Q 58.3 60.5 63.7 67.1 69.6 72.3 73.7 75.6 75.8 76.6 76.6 75.7 74.3 72.0 69.6 67.6 65.7 64.5 63.8 62.2 61.2 60.4 59.4 58.5 Third Q 66.8 67.9 70.5 73.7 76.6 78.7 80.9 81.2 82.1 82.5 82.3 81.3 79.9 77.8 73.6 73.1 71.8 71.1 70.3 69.6 69.0 68.0 67.5 66.9 Fourth Q 43.3 43.3 43.5 46.3 49.2 51.6 53.5 54.7 55.6 56.0 54.0 55.8 51.7 50.5 49.1 47.8 47.3 46.2 45.7 45.7 44.9 44.6 44.0 43.7 Davidson County & Guilford County First Q 37.5 37.1 37.9 41.5 44.8 47.5 49.7 51.4 52.7 53.6 53.6 52.4 50.3 48.2 46.3 45.0 43.9 42.9 42.3 41.3 40.4 39.7 39.1 38.1 Second Q 58.6 61.1 64.5 67.6 70.1 72.8 74.6 75.7 76.5 77.1 76.8 75.9 74.2 71.6 69.2 67.5 65.8 64.7 63.7 62.2 61.2 60.2 59.3 58.5 Third Q 68.2 69.7 72.3 75.0 77.5 79.6 81.2 82.2 83.0 83.1 82.6 81.6 79.9 77.2 74.7 73.3 72.2 72.3 71.2 70.8 70.1 69.4 68.7 68.3 Fourth Q 44.1 44.0 44.7 47.5 50.0 52.2 53.8 55.0 55.6 55.9 55.2 53.7 51.5 50.6 48.7 48.3 47.7 47.4 46.3 46.0 45.6 45.2 44.9 44.5

# Relative Humidity Catawba County First Q 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5 Second Q 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4 Third Q 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2
Fourth Q 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4 Davidson County & Guilford County First Q 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4 Second Q 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7 Third Q 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6 Fourth Q 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

4.5 Vehicle Inspection and Mainte nance Program Assumptions

The ODB-II program is administered in all of the counties in the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment area. All counties in North Carolina have a vehicle safety inspection program. In spection stations are required to administer an anti-tampering check to ensure that emissions control equipment on any vehicle, less than 35 model year s old, has not been altered. PM 2.5 

# sensitivity runs demonstrate that the inspection and maintenance program does not have an effect on direct PM 2.5 

# emission factors. Therefore, for purposes of the PM2.5 MVEBs, the I/M program was assumed to be 100% penetration.

NOx emission factors were determined for 2009 for both I/M and non I/M fractions using 2007 accident data supplied be NCDOT in August 2008. The table below shows the calculated I/M fractions used to set the NOx MVEBs.

Table 4.5. 2009 County-level I/M Fractions
County 2009 I/M Fraction

Catawba 91%
Davidson 94%
Guilford 94%

# 4.6 Reid Vapor Pressure Assumptions

Per North Carolina’s Rules in Section 15A NCAC 2D.1300 the RVP is required to be 7.8 psi June through September in areas that were nona ttainment for the 1-hour ozone standard, which includes Davidson and Guilford Coun ties. Catawba County follows the rest of State RVP of 9.0 psi for the summer. RVP was determined to have no effect on PM 2.5 

# emission factors. For the development of the PM2.5 MVEBs, a typical su mmer day is modeled using an RVP of 7.8 psi for Guilford and Davidson Counties and 9.0 psi for Catawba County.

For NOx MVEBs quarterly average RVPs per c ounty were calculated. Table 4.6 lists the RVP for each county used for the Mobile6 r uns to calculate NOx emission factors.

Table 4.6. Quarterly RVP Used to Calculate NOx MVEBs
County Q1 - Jan, Feb, Mar Q2 – Apr, May, June Q3- July, Aug, Sept Q4 – Oct, Nov, Dec Catawba 14.0 10.5 9.0 14.0 Davidson 14.0 10.1 7.8 14.0 Guilford 14.0 10.1 7.8 14.0



# 4.7 Vehicle Miles Traveled Assumptions

In order to calculate emissions from on-road mo bile sources, emission factors are developed as discussed throughout this document. The emissi on factors are then multiplied by an activity level, which for on-road mobile sources is daily VMT.

The daily VMT for the nonattainment area was provided by NCDOT. Table 4.7-1 lists the VMT used in the MVEBs calculations.

# Table 4.7-1. 2009 Daily VMT Used to Calculate the MVEBs
Road Type Catawba TDM Catawba non-TDM Davidson TDM Davidson non-TDM Guilford TDM Urban Interstate 1,068,778 165,606 333,251 371,816 4,925,953 Freeways 318,096 39,019 676,186 199,204 2,341,290 Other Prin. Arterial 762,827 167,088 448,118 372,564 2,405,901 Minor Arterial 1,132,744 152,147 293,172 298,549 2,698,219 Collector 261,444 26,271 192,524 57,169 1,143,015 Local 514,186 123,328 242,868 131,653 1,884,921 Rural Interstate 0 56,490 306,105 443,207 992,132 Other Prin. Arterial 0 75,274 249,163 287,385 587,329 Minor Arterial 0 73,290 269,215 301,987 198,365 Major Collector 0 56,815 172,846 427,935 688,901 Minor Collector 0 90,945 156,314 215,492 289,515 Local 0 68,347 301,453 157,910 440,324 Total VMT 4,058,075 1,094,620 3,641,215 3,264,870 18,595,865



# 4.8 Diesel Fuel Sulfu r Content Assumptions

The diesel fuel sulfur content is required in MOBILE6.2 to generate PM 2.5 

# emission factors because the amount of sulfur in di esel fuel directly correlates to sulfate particulate emissions. For the MVEBs calculation, the diesel fuel sulfur content is 43 parts per million (ppm) for all of the nonattainment counties. This is the same value used in the 2009 emissions modeling.



# 5. MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSION S BUDGETS FOR CONFORMITY

5.1 Transportation Conformity

The purpose of transportation conformity is to ensure that Federal transportation actions occurring in a nonattainment areas does not hinder the area from attaining and/or maintaining the annual PM 2.5 

# standard. This means that the level of emissions estimated by the NCDOT or the MPOs for the Transportation Implementation Plan and Long Range Transportation Plan must not exceed the MVEBs as defined in this attainment demonstration SIP.

The NCDAQ consults with the transportation partne rs as one of the requirements in developing the attainment demonstration SIP and setting MVEBs. The NCDAQ sent out a request for comments on setting the geographic extent of the MV EBs to all of the tran sportation partners. A copy of the letter and responses from the transpor tation partners can be found in Appendix B. In

# the letter, NCDAQ expressed its preference for setting county level budgets and some of the reasons why NCDAQ believed county level budg ets were appropriate. Additionally, the NCDAQ consulted the partners for the data used in the developm ent of the MVEBs, as well as the data used in the VISTAS/ASIP modeling. Th e consultation plan can also be found Appendix B along with the responses from the transportation partners.

With respect to the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment areas, the NCDAQ received comments from the Greensboro MPO regarding the ge ographic extent of the MVEBs. The Greensboro MPO agreed with the NCDAQ that MVEBs should be set at the county level. Copies of the letters received can be found in Appendix B. Therefore, if MVEB s are established, they will be set at the county level.

5.2 Pollutants to be Considered

40 CFR 93.119(f)(7) through (10) id entifies the pollutants for PM 2.5 

# for which regional emissions analysis needs to be performed for transportatio n conformity purposes. These parts of the rule are listed below:

§119(f)(7) – PM 2.5 

# in PM 2.5 

# areas; §119(f)(8) – Reentrained road dust in PM 2.5 

# areas only if the EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] Regional Administrator or the director of the State air agency has made a finding that emissions from r eentrained road dust within the area are a significant contributor to the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment problem and has so notified the MPO and DOT [Department of Transportation]; §119(f)(9) – NOX [nitrogen oxides] in PM 2.5 

# areas, unless the EPA Regional Administrator and the director of the St ate air agency have made a finding that emissions of NOX from with in the area are not a signi ficant contributor to the
PM 2.5 

# nonattainment problem and has so notified the MPO and DOT; and §119(f)(10) – VOC [volatile organic compounds], SO2 [sulfur dioxide] and/or ammonia
in PM 2.5 

# areas if the EPA Regional Administrator or the director of the State air agency has made a finding that any of such precursor emissions from within the area are a significant contributor to the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment problem and has so notified the MPO and DOT.

Only primary, or direct, PM 2.5 

# tailpipe emissions must be considered for transportation conformity regional emissions analysis. The othe r precursor pollutants and reentrained road dust

# only need to be considered if th e State air agency and/or the US EPA has deemed the pollutant as a significant contributor to the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment problem. The fo llowing sections discuss the significance of the precursor pollutants and reentrained road dust to the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment problem.

5.2.1 Precursor Pollutants NOx, VOC and Ammonia

The PM 2.5 

# precursor NO x 

# is presumed to be a significant contributor to the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment problem by the USEPA. The NCDAQ has determined that NOx is a relatively minor contributor to the PM 2.5 

# concentrations in North Carolina. Howe ver, the NCDAQ is not asserting that NOx is an insignificant precursor for the 1997 or 2006 revisions of the PM 2.5 

# standard. Therefore, the NCDAQ will establishe county level MVEBs for NOx for all three PM 2.5 

# nonattainment counties.

For the purpose of this attainment demonstr ation, VOC and ammonia are presumed to be insignificant contributors to the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment problem by the USEPA. The NCDAQ agrees with the USEPA that both VOC and ammo nia are insignificant contributors to the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment problem in North Carolina. The discussion of the insignificance of these precursors is presented in Apendix O. Since th ese precursors have been deemed insignificant, no MVEBs are being established for VOC or ammonia.

5.2.2 Reentrained Road Dust The majority of the roads in North Carolina are paved so there is minimum road dust due to the paved roads. The factor to calcu late reentrained road dust on pave d roads is very small. What dust is generated, has been shown in the literature, Methodology to Estimate the Transportable Fraction (TF) of Fugitive Dust Emissions fo r Regional and Urban Scale Air Quality Analyses, US EPA, August 3, 2005 , to be inconsequential.

This fact is affirmed by the sm all crustal component in the PM 2.5 

# speciated data which measures only 3% at Hickory monitoring site (Catawba County) in 20 02 and only 2% at Lexington monitoring site (Davidson County) in 2004 (see Figure 5.2.2-1 below).

# Figure 5.2.2-1. Speciated Data for the Hickory area (left) and the Triad area (right)

Since the reentrained road dust is no t a significant contributor to the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment problem, the NCDAQ will not be establishing MVEBs for this source category. An affirmative insignificance finding from the USEPA only relieves the transportation partne rs from a regional emissions analysis for reentrained road dust emi ssions for these areas and does not relieve them of the other transportation confor mity requirements. The trans portation partners will need to note the reentrained road dust insignificance finding (if found adequa te and approved by the USEPA) in future conformity determinations.

5.2.3 Precursor Pollutant SO 2


# The PM 2.5 

# precursor SO 2 

# could not be deemed insignificant to the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment problem. However, the NCDAQ has determined that SO 2 

# emitted by the mobile source sector is insignificant. The USEPA in its Federal Register notice for PM 2.5 

# does not address the mobile sector in its listing of significan t emissions. North Carolina agrees with the following statements addressing SO 2 

# from on-road mobile emissions as published in the May 6, 2005 Federal Register, 70 FR 24283: Hickory AIRS Code 370350004 POC 5 (ROUTINE) Date(s): 1/2/2002 - 12/4/2002 Average Concentration (μg/m3)

Nitrate

6%

Sulfate 30%

Ammonium 10% Organic carbon 32% Elemental carbon 4% Crustal component 3% Other 15% (NC) - Lexington AIRS Code 370570002 POC 5 (ROUTINE) Date(s): 1/16/2004 - 2/9/2005 Average Concentration (μg/m3)

Nitrate

7%

Sulfat e 29%

Ammonium 10% Organic carbon 28% Elemental carbon 4% Crustal component 2% Other 20%

# “While speciated air quality dat a show that sulfate is a relatively signific ant component (e.g., ranging from nine to 40 percent) of PM 2.5 

# mass in all regions of the country, emissions inventory data and projections show that on-road emissions of SOx constitute a ‘‘de minimis’’ (i.e., extremely small) portion of total SOx em issions. Emissions inventory data for 1999 for the 372 potential PM 2.5 

# nonattainment counties for PM 2.5 

# (based on 1999–2001 air quality data) show that on-road s ources were responsible for only two percent of total SOx emissions.

Furthermore, EPA has already adopted tw o regulations that will greatly reduce emissions of SOx from on-road sources by the ti me such regulations are both in full effect in 2009. First, in 2004 the low sulfur gasoline program began to be phased in and will be fully effective in 2007 (February 10, 2000, 65 FR 6697). This regulation will reduce the sulfur content of gasoline by approximately 90 percent when fully effective. Second, in 2006 the low sulfur diesel program will begin to be phased in and will be fully effective by 2009 (January 18, 2001, 66 FR 5001). This regulation will reduce the sulfur content of diesel fuel by approximately 97 percent nationally when fully effective.

Projections of on-r oad emissions of SO 2 

# in 2020 indicate that on-road sources will be responsible for less than one percent of the total SO 2 

# emissions in 2020 in the 372 potential PM 2.5 

# nonattainment counties (based on 1999– 2001 air quality data). These projections confirm that the implementation of the fuel regulations discussed above will ensure that as a general matter of SO 2 

# emissions from on-road sources remain at insignificant levels in all areas.”

Although sulfate is a signif icant component to the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment problem in North Carolina, the majority of the SO2 emissions in 2009 come from the stationary point source sector (see Figure 5.2.3-1). The mobile source sector on ly contributes one half of one percent (0.05 %) of the 2009 statewide SO 2 

# emissions. This is consistent with what the USEPA stated above.

Figure 5.2.3-1. North Carolina’s 2009 Statewide SO 2 

# Emissions Nonroad

0.6%
Area 2.1%
Mobile 0.5% Point 96.7%

# Since the mobile source SO 2 

# contribution is insignificant, the NCDAQ is not establishing MVEBs for this precursor. An affirmative insignificance finding from the USEPA only relieves the transportation partners from a regional emissions analysis for SO 2 

# emissions for these areas and does not relieve them of the other transportation conformity requirements. The transportation partners will need to note the SO 2 

# insignificance finding (if found adequate and approved by the USEPA) in futu re conformity determinations.

5.3 Highway Mobile Source Direct PM 2.5 

# Emssions

The mobile source pollutants to be addressed fo r transportation conformity purposes are direct
PM 2.5 

# emissions for the Triad and NOx for both Hi ckory and the Triad. 40 CFR 93.109(k) in the Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments fo r the new 8-hour ozone and fine particulate matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards ( NAAQSs) addresses areas with insignificant motor vehicle emissions as follows,

“Notwithstanding the other paragraphs in this section, an area is not required to satisfy a regional emissions analys is for §93.118 and/or §93.119 for a given pollutant/precursor and NAAQS, if EPA finds through the adequacy or approval process that a SIP demonstrates that regional motor vehicle emissions are an insignificant contributor to the air quality problem for that pollutant/precursor and NAAQS. The SIP would have to demonstrate that it would be unreasonable to expect that such an area would experience enough motor vehicle emissions growth in that pollutant/precursor for a NAAQS violation to occur.”

The rule suggests that such a finding would be based on a number of factors, including the percentage of motor vehicle emi ssions in the context of the tota l SIP inventory, the current state of air quality as determined by monitoring data for that NAAQS, the absence of SIP motor vehicle control measures, and historical trends and future projections of the growth of motor vehicle emissions. Although there is an inspection and maintenance program in the nonattainment areas, this control measure does not control primary PM 2.5 

# , but rather is in place to reduce the ozone precursors.

The NCDAQ believes strongly that the primary PM 2.5 

# emissions from mobile sources do not contribute significantly to the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment problem. However, USEPA has indicated they will not approve a SIP that does not set MVEBs for primary PM 2.5 

# for the Triad. Therefore, the NCDAQ will establishe county level MVEBs for primary PM 2.5 

# for the Triad. The sections that follow discuss the insi gnificance of PM2.5 emissions.

# 5.3.1 Insignificance of Primary PM 2.5 

# Emissions The NCDAQ has examined the sources of PM 2.5 

# emissions and their contribution to PM 2.5 

# formation in the nonattainment counties. This was accomplished using the 2009 emissions inventories developed for the VISTAS/ASIP modeling. Figure 5.3.1-1 and 5.3.1-2 provides the percent contributions from point , area, nonroad mobile and on-road mobile source sectors for the Hickory and Triad nonattainm ent areas, respectively.

Figure 5.3.1-1. Hickory Area 2009 Primary PM 2.5 

# Emissions

Figure 5.3.1-2. Triad Area 2009 Primary PM 2.5 

# Emissions 1.59%

68.70% 1.49%

28.22%

Mobile
Point
Area
Nonroad



### 4.76% 10.37%

78.19% 6.68%

Mobile
Point
Area
Nonroad

# The 2009 on-road mobile PM 2.5 

# emissions contributed only 1.6% of the total PM 2.5 

# emissions for the Hickory area. In the Triad area, the 2009 mobile PM 2.5 

# emissions were 4.8% of the total
PM 2.5 

# emissions. Therefore, in both areas it is demonstrated, in th e opinion of NCDAQ, that the
PM 2.5 

# emissions compared to the total PM 2.5 

# emissions are insignificant. However, USEPA has indicated that they only agree with the insi gnificance finding for on -road direct PM2.5 for Hickory. It should be note d that the mobile source PM 2.5 

# emissions slightly decrease from 2002 to 2009 despite an increase in VMT. The Hickory PM 2.5 

# emissions go from 100 tons/year in 2002 to 75 tons/year in 2009 and the Triad area goe s from 319 tons/year to 245 tons/year. Meanwhile, we see an increase in VMT in th e Hickory area from 4,444,280 miles/day in 2002 to 5,081,590 miles/day in 2009. For the Triad, th e VMT grows from 15,000,150 miles/day in 2002 to 16,399,220 miles/day in 2009. Furthe r justification for the case insignificance of direct PM2.5 emission follows.

The NCDAQ performed sensitivit y modeling using 2008 emissions m odeling in order to address the challenge of Section 93.109( k) in the Transportation C onformity Rule Amendments, “The SIP would have to demonstrate that it would be unreasonable to expect enough motor vehicle emissions growth in that pollutant/precursor for a NAAQ S violation to occur”. The modeling system used was the same as the VISTAS/ASI P modeling and consisted of three components: 1) the Penn State University/National Center fo r Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model (MM5 version 3.6.1+), 2) the Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions Modeling System (SMOKE version 2.1), and 3) the Commun ity Multiscale Air Quality (CM AQ version 4.4) model. Model configurations, input data, and modeling methods are consistent with those suggested by the USEPA in Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Anal yses in Attainment Demonstrations for the 8-hour Ozone NAAQS

.
The primary PM 2.5 

# emissions from on-road mobile sources were doubled in Catawba, Davidson and Guilford Counties, therefore, simulating a doubling of the VMT during a 7-day summer time simulation. The results of the em issions sensitivities showed such similar results that looking at just the difference between two air quality mode l simulations, one with base case emissions and another with reduced emissions inputs, showed no change. To show what the differences were between the two runs, line graphs of the hourly emissions for the time period modeled for all three counties are displayed in Figures 5.3.1-3 through 5.3.1-5 below

. The sensitivity modeling design value (DV) increased by 0.04 μ g/m 3 

# in Catawba County. In the Triad nonattainment area, the sensitivity modeling DV increased by 0.05 μ g/m 3 

# and 0.07 μ g/m 3 

# in Davidson and Guilford Counties, respectively. In bot h nonattainment areas, the modeling DV increased by less than one-tenth μ g/m 3 

# . These differences are barely visi ble as seen in the figures below.

# Figure 5.3.1-3. Catawba County Hourly PM 25 

# Emissions

Figure 5.3.1-4. Davidson County Hourly PM 25 

# Emissions Davidson County Hourly PM2.5 2008 baseline (blue) vs. 2008 with 100% On-road Mobile PM2.5 primary increase (red)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 351815222936435057647178859299106113120127134141148155162169

hourug/m3 2008 100% mb PM2.5 primary increase 2008-baseline Catawba County Hourly PM2.5 2008 baseline (blue) vs. 2008 with 100% On-road Mobile PM2.5 primary increase (red)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2917131925313743495561677379859197103109115121127133139145151157163

hourug/m3 2008 100% mb PM2.5 increase 2008-baseline

# Figure 5.3.1-5. Guilford County Hourly PM 25 

# Emissions

Based on the information discussed above, the NC DAQ steadfastly believes that the on-road mobile PM 2.5 

# emissions are insignificant contributors to the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment problem. Emission estimates indicate that the on-road mobile PM 2.5 

# emissions are a small percentage of the total PM 2.5 

# emissions in the nonattainment areas. On-road mobile PM 2.5 

# emissions are projected to decrease into the future notw ithstanding VMT increases. Air quality modeling sensitivities show that do ubling the mobile source PM 2.5 

# emissions has very little effect on the future design values. Furthermore, both nonatt ainment areas are modeled to be well below the annual PM 2.5 

# NAAQS by 2009 as discussed in the atta inment demonstration SIP narrative and the NCDAQ considers it unreasona ble to expect that the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment areas will experience enough motor vehicle PM 2.5 

# emissions growth for a future PM 2.5 

# violation to occur due to mobile sources.

Due to above analysis and agreement from EPA, budgets for direct PM2.5 will not be set for the Hickory nonattainment area. An affirmativ e insignificance finding from the USEPA only relieves the transportation partners fro m a regional emissions analysis for PM 2.5 

# emissions for this area and does not relieve them of the othe r transportation conformity requirements. The transportation partners will need to note the PM 2.5 

# insignificance finding (if found adequate and approved by the USEPA) in futu re conformity determinations. Guilford County Hourly PM2.5 2008 baseline (blue) vs. 2008 with 100% On-road Mobile PM2.5 primary increase (red)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 361815222936435057647178859299106113120127134141148155162169

hourug/m3 2008 100% mb PM2.5 primary increase 2008-baseline

# 5.3.2 PM 25 

# and NOx Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets As part of the consultation process on se tting MVEBs, the NCDAQ sent out a request for comment on setting the geographic extent of the MV EBs to all of the tran sportation partners. A copy of the letter can be found in Appendix B. In the letter, the NCDAQ expressed its preference for setting county le vel budgets and some of the reasons why the NCDAQ believed county level budgets were appropriate. With respect to the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment areas, the NCDAQ received comments from the Greensboro MP O regarding the geographic extent of the MVEBs. The Greensboro MPO agreed with th e NCDAQ that MVEBs should be set at the county level. Copies of the lette rs received that relate to the PM 2.5 

# nonattainment areas can be found in Appendix B. Therefore MVEB s will be set at the county level.

MVEBs will be set for the attainment year 2009. By the time the MVEBs are found adequate or approved by the USEPA, the next transportation conformity regional emissions analysis should be for years 2009 and beyond. Therefore, MVEBs w ill not be set for the baseline year 2002.

Although the emissions are usually expressed in term s of tons, the MVEBs w ill be set in terms of kilograms (kg). The reason for this asserti on is because the MOBILE model generates the emissions factors in grams per mile. In past conf ormity exercises, there have been some issues with conversion to tons, as well as concerns with how th e MVEBs were rounded. Setting MVEBs in kilograms will avoid these issues in future conformity determinations.

Tables 5.3.2-1 and 5.3.2-2 below display the Triad highway mobile PM 2.5 

# and the Triad and Hickory highway mobile NO X 

# emissions expressed in tons per year and the corresponding kilograms per year values for 2009. These two tabl es are for reference purposes only and are not the tables presenting the 2009 MVEB s, which is discussed next.

Table 5.3.2-1. County Level PM 2.5 

# Highway Mobile Emissions for 2009
County MVEB (Tons/year) MVEB (Kilograms/year) Davidson 78.4 71,152 Guilford 181.1 164,286

# Table 5.3.2-2. County Level NO X 

# Highway Mobile Emissions for 2009
County MVEB (Tons/year) MVEB (Kilograms/year) Catawba 3183.4 2,887,955 Davidson 4780.2 4,336,567 Guilford 11,034.9 10,010,856

The NCDAQ will set MVEBs, for transportation conformity purposes, as county budgets for 2009. Tables 5.3.2-3 and 5.3.2-4 below present the Triad PM 2.5 

# and the Triad and Hickory NOx MVEBs in kilograms per year, by county. Upon the USEPA’s affirmative adequacy finding for these county level sub-area MVEBs, these MVEB s will become the applicable MVEBs for each county.

Table 5.3.2-3. County Level PM 25 

# MVEBs for 2009
County MVEB (Kg/year) Davidson 71,152 Guilford 164,286

Table 5.3.2-4. County Level NOx MVEBs for 2009
County MVEB (Kg/year) Catawba 2,887,955 Davidson 4,336,567 Guilford 10,010,856

# 6. MOBILE6.2 DATA US ED IN SETTING MVEBs

6.1 MOBILE6.2 Input Files for PM2.5 and NOx

6.1.1 Input Files for PM2.5 6.1.1.1 Catawba County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Input File for PM2.5

POLLUTANTS : PARTICULATES : SPREADSHEET : Catawba County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 9.0

REG DIST : ncage05.prn

MIN/MAX TEMP : 50.0 70.0

> OBDII

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2004 2050 1 TRC OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 5.0 5.0

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2004 2050 1 TRC EVAP OBD I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 5.0 5.0

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3442 0.0815 0.2714 0.0836 0.0384 0.0564 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0149 0.0162 0.0577 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3699 0.0876 0.2918 0.0899 0.0413 0.0366 0.0036 0.0030 0.0023 0.0082 0.0097 0.0105 0.0374 0.0019 0.0009 0.0054AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 27 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3930 0.0931 0.3100 0.0956 0.0439 0.0188 0.0018 0.0015 0.0012 0.0042 0.0050 0.0054 0.0192 0.0010 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3967 0.0939 0.3127 0.0964 0.0443 0.0161 0.0016 0.0013 0.0010 0.0036 0.0043 0.0046 0.0165 0.0008 0.0004 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 33 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3872 0.0917 0.3054 0.0941 0.0433 0.0233 0.0023 0.0019 0.0014 0.0052 0.0062 0.0067 0.0238 0.0012 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3030 0.0718 0.2389 0.0736 0.0339 0.0880 0.0086 0.0072 0.0054 0.0197 0.0233 0.0253 0.0900 0.0045 0.0023 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3591 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0458 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3668 0.0869 0.2894 0.0892 0.0410 0.0389 0.0038 0.0032 0.0024 0.0087 0.0103 0.0112 0.0398 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3827 0.0906 0.3018 0.0930 0.0428 0.0267 0.0026 0.0022 0.0017 0.0060 0.0071 0.0077 0.0274 0.0014 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS :0.3821 0.0905 0.3014 0.0929 0.0427 0.0272 0.0027 0.0022 0.0017 0.0061 0.0072 0.0078 0.0278 0.0014 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3805 0.0901 0.3001 0.0925 0.0425 0.0284 0.0028 0.0023 0.0018 0.0064 0.0075 0.0082 0.0291 0.0015 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3442 0.0815 0.2714 0.0836 0.0384 0.0564 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0149 0.0162 0.0577 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 63 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3699 0.0876 0.2918 0.0899 0.0413 0.0366 0.0036 0.0030 0.0023 0.0082 0.0097 0.0105 0.0374 0.0019 0.0009 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-QCALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3930 0.0931 0.3100 0.0956 0.0439 0.0188 0.0018 0.0015 0.0012 0.0042 0.0050 0.0054 0.0192 0.0010 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3967 0.0939 0.3127 0.0964 0.0443 0.0161 0.0016 0.0013 0.0010 0.0036 0.0043 0.0046 0.0165 0.0008 0.0004 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.0

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3872 0.0917 0.3054 0.0941 0.0433 0.0233 0.0023 0.0019 0.0014 0.0052 0.0062 0.0067 0.0238 0.0012 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

END OF RUN :

# 6.1.1.2 Davidson County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Input File for PM2.5

POLLUTANTS : PARTICULATES : SPREADSHEET : Davidson County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 7.8

MIN/MAX TEMP : 49.0 70.0

REG DIST : NCage05.prn

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2004 2050 1 TRC OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 5.0 5.0

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2004 2050 1 TRC EVAP OBD I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 5.0 5.0

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22121111 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3030 0.0718 0.2389 0.0736 0.0339 0.0880 0.0086 0.0072 0.0054 0.0197 0.0233 0.0253 0.0900 0.0045 0.0023 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 68 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3591 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0458 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3668 0.0869 0.2894 0.0892 0.0410 0.0389 0.0038 0.0032 0.0024 0.0087 0.0103 0.0112 0.0398 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

********** SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3827 0.0906 0.3018 0.0930 0.0428 0.0267 0.0026 0.0022 0.0017 0.0060 0.0071 0.0077 0.0274 0.0014 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3821 0.0905 0.3014 0.0929 0.0427 0.0272 0.0027 0.0022 0.0017 0.0061 0.0072 0.0078 0.0278 0.0014 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 48 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3805 0.0901 0.3001 0.0925 0.0425 0.0284 0.0028 0.0023 0.0018 0.0064 0.0075 0.0082 0.0291 0.0015 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3442 0.0815 0.2714 0.0836 0.0384 0.0564 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0149 0.0162 0.0577 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3699 0.0876 0.2918 0.0899 0.0413 0.0366 0.0036 0.0030 0.0023 0.0082 0.0097 0.0105 0.0374 0.0019 0.0009 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 52 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3930 0.0931 0.3100 0.0956 0.0439 0.0188 0.0018 0.0015 0.0012 0.0042 0.0050 0.0054 0.0192 0.0010 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3967 0.0939 0.3127 0.0964 0.0443 0.0161 0.0016 0.0013 0.0010 0.0036 0.0043 0.0046 0.0165 0.0008 0.0004 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3872 0.0917 0.3054 0.0941 0.0433 0.0233 0.0023 0.0019 0.0014 0.0052 0.0062 0.0067 0.0238 0.0012 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ********

SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate - Non Modeled CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3030 0.0718 0.2389 0.0736 0.0339 0.0880 0.0086 0.0072 0.0054 0.0197 0.0233 0.0253 0.0900 0.0045 0.0023 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 65 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial - Non Modeled CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3591 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0458 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial - Non Modeled CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3668 0.0869 0.2894 0.0892 0.0410 0.0389 0.0038 0.0032 0.0024 0.0087 0.0103 0.0112 0.0398 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

********** SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector - Non Modeled CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3827 0.0906 0.3018 0.0930 0.0428 0.0267 0.0026 0.0022 0.0017 0.0060 0.0071 0.0077 0.0274 0.0014 0.0007 0.0056AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector - Non Modeled CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3821 0.0905 0.3014 0.0929 0.0427 0.0272 0.0027 0.0022 0.0017 0.0061 0.0072 0.0078 0.0278 0.0014 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local - Non Modeled CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3805 0.0901 0.3001 0.0925 0.0425 0.0284 0.0028 0.0023 0.0018 0.0064 0.0075 0.0082 0.0291 0.0015 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate - Non Modeled CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3442 0.0815 0.2714 0.0836 0.0384 0.0564 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0149 0.0162 0.0577 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 62 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway - Non Modeled CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3699 0.0876 0.2918 0.0899 0.0413 0.0366 0.0036 0.0030 0.0023 0.0082 0.0097 0.0105 0.0374 0.0019 0.0009 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial - Non Modeled CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSVPARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 28 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial - Non Modeled CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3930 0.0931 0.3100 0.0956 0.0439 0.0188 0.0018 0.0015 0.0012 0.0042 0.0050 0.0054 0.0192 0.0010 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector - Non Modeled CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3967 0.0939 0.3127 0.0964 0.0443 0.0161 0.0016 0.0013 0.0010 0.0036 0.0043 0.0046 0.0165 0.0008 0.0004 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local - Non Modeled CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3872 0.0917 0.3054 0.0941 0.0433 0.0233 0.0023 0.0019 0.0014 0.0052 0.0062 0.0067 0.0238 0.0012 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

END OF RUN :

# 6.1.1.3 Guilford County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Input File for PM2.5

POLLUTANTS : PARTICULATES : SPREADSHEET : Guilford County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 7.8

MIN/MAX TEMP : 49.0 70.0

REG DIST : trdage05.prn

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2003 2050 1 TRC OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 5.0 5.0

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2003 2050 1 TRC EVAP OBD I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 5.0 5.0

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22121111 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3030 0.0718 0.2389 0.0736 0.0339 0.0880 0.0086 0.0072 0.0054 0.0197 0.0233 0.0253 0.0900 0.0045 0.0023 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 59 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3591 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0458 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3668 0.0869 0.2894 0.0892 0.0410 0.0389 0.0038 0.0032 0.0024 0.0087 0.0103 0.0112 0.0398 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 45 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3827 0.0906 0.3018 0.0930 0.0428 0.0267 0.0026 0.0022 0.0017 0.0060 0.0071 0.0077 0.0274 0.0014 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3821 0.0905 0.3014 0.0929 0.0427 0.0272 0.0027 0.0022 0.0017 0.0061 0.0072 0.0078 0.0278 0.0014 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3805 0.0901 0.3001 0.0925 0.0425 0.0284 0.0028 0.0023 0.0018 0.0064 0.0075 0.0082 0.0291 0.0015 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3442 0.0815 0.2714 0.0836 0.0384 0.0564 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0149 0.0162 0.0577 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3699 0.0876 0.2918 0.0899 0.0413 0.0366 0.0036 0.0030 0.0023 0.0082 0.0097 0.0105 0.0374 0.0019 0.0009 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 54 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3930 0.0931 0.3100 0.0956 0.0439 0.0188 0.0018 0.0015 0.0012 0.0042 0.0050 0.0054 0.0192 0.0010 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50 DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3967 0.0939 0.3127 0.0964 0.0443 0.0161 0.0016 0.0013 0.0010 0.0036 0.0043 0.0046 0.0165 0.0008 0.0004 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local - TDM CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV PARTICLE SIZE : 2.50DIESEL SULFUR : 43.00

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3872 0.0917 0.3054 0.0941 0.0433 0.0233 0.0023 0.0019 0.0014 0.0052 0.0062 0.0067 0.0238 0.0012 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

END OF RUN :



# 6.1.2 2009 MOBILE6.2 Input Files for NOx 6.1.2.1 Catawba County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Input Files for NOx

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Catawba County 2009 IM,TDM/Rural, PM SIP Winter Q1 > Updated with new vehicle-mix and vehicle-age Sept '08

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Catawba County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 14

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 37.8 36.8 37.2 40.6 44.1 47.8 50.3 52.6 53.8 54.7 54.8 54.0 51.5 49.3 47.8 46.4 44.8 44.1 42.8 41.5 40.5 40.2 39.6 38.6

> OBDII

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2004 2050 1 TRC OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 5.0 5.0

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2004 2050 1 TRC EVAP OBD I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 5.0 5.0

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ********SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 27 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 33 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speedsVMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5 BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 63 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.650.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Catawba County 2009 Non IM,TDM/Rural, PM SIP Winter Q1 > Updated with new vehicle-mix and vehicle-age Sept '08

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Catawba County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 14

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 37.8 36.8 37.2 40.6 44.1 47.8 50.3 52.6 53.8 54.7 54.8 54.0 51.5 49.3 47.8 46.4 44.8 44.1 42.8 41.5 40.5 40.2 39.6 38.6

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 27 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 33 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5 BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 63 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speedsVMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.2 76.0 76.1 70.5 63.2 59.5 54.6 53.1 51.6 47.5 47.4 48.6 50.1 55.4 57.8 58.6 61.9 64.5 67.0 68.1 70.5 70.1 72.0 73.5

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE** :

> Catawba County 2009 IM,TDM/Rural, PM SIP Spring Q2 > Updated with new vehicle-mix and vehicle-age Sept '08

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Catawba County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 10.5

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 58.3 60.5 63.7 67.1 69.6 72.3 73.7 75.6 75.8 76.6 76.6 75.7 74.3 72.0 69.6 67.6 65.7 64.5 63.8 62.2 61.2 60.4 59.4 58.5

> OBDII

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2004 2050 1 TRC OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 95.0I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 5.0 5.0

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2004 2050 1 TRC EVAP OBD I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 5.0 5.0

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051 AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 27 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 33 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 63 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ********SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Catawba County 2009 NON IM,TDM/Rural, PM SIP Spring Q2 > Updated with new vehicle-mix and vehicle-age Sept '08

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Catawba County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 10.5

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 58.3 60.5 63.7 67.1 69.6 72.3 73.7 75.6 75.8 76.6 76.6 75.7 74.3 72.0 69.6 67.6 65.7 64.5 63.8 62.2 61.2 60.4 59.4 58.5

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051 AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ********SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 27 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 33 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speedsVMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 63 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.3 82.7 74.8 66.5 60.0 55.2 52.3 49.1 48.5 47.6 48.3 49.2 51.0 55.6 60.5 64.7 68.4 71.9 74.7 76.4 79.5 81.8 83.4 84.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Catawba County 2009 IM,TDM/Rural, PM SIP Spring Q3 > Updated with new vehicle-mix and vehicle-age Sept '08

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Catawba County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 9.0

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 66.8 67.9 70.5 73.7 76.6 78.7 80.9 81.2 82.1 82.5 82.3 81.3 79.9 77.8 73.6 73.1 71.8 71.1 70.3 69.6 69.0 68.0 67.5 66.9

> OBDII

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2004 2050 1 TRC OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 5.0 5.0

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2004 2050 1 TRC EVAP OBD I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 5.0 5.0

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051 AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 27 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 33 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q3CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 63 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2 BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Catawba County 2009 NON IM,TDM/Rural, PM SIP Spring Q3 > Updated with new vehicle-mix and vehicle-age Sept '08POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Catawba County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 9.0

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 66.8 67.9 70.5 73.7 76.6 78.7 80.9 81.2 82.1 82.5 82.3 81.3 79.9 77.8 73.6 73.1 71.8 71.1 70.3 69.6 69.0 68.0 67.5 66.9

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051 AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 27 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speedsVMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 33 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 63 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 87.9 85.2 80.3 73.1 67.6 63.0 58.3 58.5 56.6 56.6 56.5 58.6 60.3 63.3 73.1 74.3 78.8 81.0 82.0 83.6 84.7 86.8 87.2 88.2

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Catawba County 2009 IM,TDM/Rural, PM SIP Fall Q4 > Updated with new vehicle-mix and vehicle-age Sept '08

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Catawba County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 14

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 43.3 43.3 43.5 46.3 49.2 51.6 53.5 54.7 55.6 56.0 54.0 55.8 51.7 50.5 49.1 47.8 47.3 46.2 45.7 45.7 44.9 44.6 44.0 43.7

> OBDII

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2004 2050 1 TRC OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 5.0 5.0

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2004 2050 1 TRC EVAP OBD I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 5.0 5.0

ANTI-TAMP PROG :91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 27 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ********SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 33 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4 BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS :0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 63 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Catawba County 2009 Non IM,TDM/Rural, PM SIP Fall Q4 > Updated with new vehicle-mix and vehicle-age Sept '08

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Catawba County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 14

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 43.3 43.3 43.5 46.3 49.2 51.6 53.5 54.7 55.6 56.0 54.0 55.8 51.7 50.5 49.1 47.8 47.3 46.2 45.7 45.7 44.9 44.6 44.0 43.7

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS :0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 27 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 33 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.267.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4 BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 63 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ********SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 29 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.7 86.0 85.4 79.8 73.6 67.7 63.8 61.5 59.4 57.9 58.8 62.2 67.1 70.6 73.1 74.2 76.9 80.8 81.7 82.3 83.4 84.4 84.9 85.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

# 6.1.2.2 Davidson County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Input Files for NOx

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE** :

> Davidson County 2009 I&M PM SIP Winter(Q1) > 2007 Veh Age Dist.

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Davidson County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 14

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 37.5 37.1 37.9 41.5 44.8 47.5 49.7 51.4 52.7 53.6 53.6 52.4 50.3 48.2 46.3 45.0 43.9 42.9 42.3 41.3 40.4 39.7 39.1 38.1

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2004 2050 1 TRC OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 5.0 5.0

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2004 2050 1 TRC EVAP OBD I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 5.0 5.0

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 68 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q1CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 48 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 52 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS :0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 65 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 62 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 28 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Davidson County 2009 NON I&M PM SIP Winter(Q1) > 2007 Veh Age Dist.

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Davidson County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 14

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 37.5 37.1 37.9 41.5 44.8 47.5 49.7 51.4 52.7 53.6 53.6 52.4 50.3 48.2 46.3 45.0 43.9 42.9 42.3 41.3 40.4 39.7 39.1 38.1

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 68 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 48 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 52 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q1CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 65 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speedsVMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 62 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 28 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE** :

> Davidson County 2009 I&M PM SIP Spring(Q2) > 2007 Veh Age Dist.

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Davidson County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 10.1

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 58.6 61.1 64.5 67.6 70.1 72.8 74.6 75.7 76.5 77.1 76.8 75.9 74.2 71.6 69.2 67.5 65.8 64.7 63.7 62.2 61.2 60.2 59.3 58.5

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2004 2050 1 TRC OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 5.0 5.0

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2004 2050 1 TRC EVAP OBD I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 5.0 5.0

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 68 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054 AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 48 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 52 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q2CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 65 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural local mix and speedsVMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 62 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 28 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059 AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Davidson County 2009 NON I&M PM SIP Spring(Q2) > 2007 Veh Age Dist.

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Davidson County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 10.1

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 58.6 61.1 64.5 67.6 70.1 72.8 74.6 75.7 76.5 77.1 76.8 75.9 74.2 71.6 69.2 67.5 65.8 64.7 63.7 62.2 61.2 60.2 59.3 58.5

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.00720.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 68 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054 AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 48 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 52 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 65 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ********SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 62 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 28 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speedsVMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059 AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Davidson County 2009 I&M PM SIP Summer(Q3) > 2007 Veh Age Dist.

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Davidson County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 7.8

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 68.2 69.7 72.3 75.0 77.5 79.6 81.2 82.2 83.0 83.1 82.6 81.6 79.9 77.2 74.7 73.3 72.2 72.3 71.2 70.8 70.1 69.4 68.7 68.3

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2004 2050 1 TRC OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 5.0 5.0

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2004 2050 1 TRC EVAP OBD I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2050I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 5.0 5.0

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 68 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 48 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051 AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 52 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate RuralCALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 65 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 62 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.00544

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS :0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 28 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Davidson County 2009 NON I&M PM SIP Summer(Q3) > 2007 Veh Age Dist.

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Davidson County RUN DATA :***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 7.8

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 68.2 69.7 72.3 75.0 77.5 79.6 81.2 82.2 83.0 83.1 82.6 81.6 79.9 77.2 74.7 73.3 72.2 72.3 71.2 70.8 70.1 69.4 68.7 68.3

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 68 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 48 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051 AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 52 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.563.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 65 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector RuralCALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 62 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 28 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Davidson County Year+1 - 2010 I&M PM SIP Fall(Q4) > 2007 Veh Age Dist.POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Davidson County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 14.0

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 44.1 44.0 44.7 47.5 50.0 52.2 53.8 55.0 55.6 55.9 55.2 53.7 51.5 50.6 48.7 48.3 47.7 47.4 46.3 46.0 45.6 45.2 44.9 44.5

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2004 2050 1 TRC OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 5.0 5.0

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2004 2050 1 TRC EVAP OBD I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 5.0 5.0

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 68 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 48 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054 AVERAGE SPEED : 52 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 65 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector RuralCALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 62 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 28 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS :0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Davidson County Year+1 - 2010 NON I&M PM SIP Fall(Q4) > 2007 Veh Age Dist.

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Davidson County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 14.0

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 44.1 44.0 44.7 47.5 50.0 52.2 53.8 55.0 55.6 55.9 55.2 53.7 51.5 50.6 48.7 48.3 47.7 47.4 46.3 46.0 45.6 45.2 44.9 44.5

REG DIST : ncage07.prn

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 68 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor arterial mix and speedsVMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 48 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051AVERAGE SPEED : 66 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054 AVERAGE SPEED : 52 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.370.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 65 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 43 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 42 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 62 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway RuralCALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 56 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 28 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 31 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local Rural CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 32 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :



# 6.1.2.3 Guilford County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Input File for Nox

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Guilford County 2009 I&M PM SIP Winter(Q1) > Guiage07 Veh Age Dist.

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Guilford County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 14.0

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 37.5 37.1 37.9 41.5 44.8 47.5 49.7 51.4 52.7 53.6 53.6 52.4 50.3 48.2 46.3 45.0 43.9 42.9 42.3 41.3 40.4 39.7 39.1 38.1

REG DIST : guiage07.prn

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2003 2050 1 TRC OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 5.0 5.0

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2003 2050 1 TRC EVAP OBD I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 5.0 5.0

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 59 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 45 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 54 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speedsVMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Guilford County 2009 Non-IM PM SIP Winter(Q1) > Guiage07 Veh Age Dist.

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Guilford County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 14.0

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 37.5 37.1 37.9 41.5 44.8 47.5 49.7 51.4 52.7 53.6 53.6 52.4 50.3 48.2 46.3 45.0 43.9 42.9 42.3 41.3 40.4 39.7 39.1 38.1

REG DIST : guiage07.prn

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q1CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 59 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 45 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q1CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 54 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q1 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 74.5 75.1 74.9 67.8 59.9 55.7 52.1 49.5 47.7 46.6 45.8 48.0 51.9 56.6 58.6 61.2 63.4 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 68.8 70.3 72.4

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Guilford County 2009 I&M PM SIP Spring(Q2)> Guiage07 Veh Age Dist.

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Guilford County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 10.1

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 58.6 61.1 64.5 67.6 70.1 72.8 74.6 75.7 76.5 77.1 76.8 75.9 74.2 71.6 69.2 67.5 65.8 64.7 63.7 62.2 61.2 60.2 59.3 58.5

REG DIST : guiage07.prn

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2003 2050 1 TRC OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 5.0 5.0

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2003 2050 1 TRC EVAP OBD I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 5.0 5.0

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 59 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speedsVMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 45 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 54 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Guilford County 2009 Non-IM PM SIP Spring(Q2) > Guiage07 Veh Age Dist.

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Guilford County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 10.1

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 58.6 61.1 64.5 67.6 70.1 72.8 74.6 75.7 76.5 77.1 76.8 75.9 74.2 71.6 69.2 67.5 65.8 64.7 63.7 62.2 61.2 60.2 59.3 58.5

REG DIST : guiage07.prn

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 59 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 45 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.549.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 54 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q2 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 82.0 79.1 71.1 63.6 58.4 53.0 49.5 46.8 45.3 44.3 45.4 46.5 49.5 54.7 59.4 62.9 66.8 69.6 70.3 72.7 75.5 77.9 80.4 81.7

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Guilford County 2009 I&M PM SIP Summer(Q3) > Guiage07 Veh Age Dist.

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Guilford County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 7.8

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 68.2 69.7 72.3 75.0 77.5 79.6 81.2 82.2 83.0 83.1 82.6 81.6 79.9 77.2 74.7 73.3 72.2 72.3 71.2 70.8 70.1 69.4 68.7 68.3

REG DIST : guiage07.prn

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2003 2050 1 TRC OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 5.0 5.0

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2003 2050 1 TRC EVAP OBD I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 5.0 5.0

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 59 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 45 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q3CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 54 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ********SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Guilford County 2009 Non-IM PM SIP Summer(Q3) > Guiage07 Veh Age Dist.

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Guilford County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 7.8

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 68.2 69.7 72.3 75.0 77.5 79.6 81.2 82.2 83.0 83.1 82.6 81.6 79.9 77.2 74.7 73.3 72.2 72.3 71.2 70.8 70.1 69.4 68.7 68.3

REG DIST : guiage07.prn

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222 ************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 59 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 45 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.563.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 54 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q3 CALENDAR YEAR : 2009 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 86.8 84.8 79.3 73.9 68.3 64.3 60.7 59.3 57.6 56.8 57.6 59.5 63.2 69.1 73.6 76.4 77.6 78.6 80.1 81.4 82.3 83.5 84.9 86.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Guilford County IM PMSIP (Run Yr + 1) 2010 Fall(Q4) > guiage07 Veh Age Dist.

POLLUTANTS : NOX SPREADSHEET : Guilford County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 14.0

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 44.1 44.0 44.7 47.5 50.0 52.2 53.8 55.0 55.6 55.9 55.2 53.7 51.5 50.6 48.7 48.3 47.7 47.4 46.3 46.0 45.6 45.2 44.9 44.5

REG DIST : guiage07.prn

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2003 2050 1 TRC OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 5.0 5.0

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2003 2050 1 TRC EVAP OBD I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2050 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 10.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 95.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 5.0 5.0

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 59 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 45 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 54 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN :

**MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :**

> Guilford County Non-IM PM SIP (Run Yr + 1) 2010 Fall(Q4) > guiage07 Veh Age Dist.

POLLUTANTS : NOXSPREADSHEET : Guilford County RUN DATA : ***************** RUN SECTION ********** FUEL RVP : 14.0

HOURLY TEMPERATURES: 44.1 44.0 44.7 47.5 50.0 52.2 53.8 55.0 55.6 55.9 55.2 53.7 51.5 50.6 48.7 48.3 47.7 47.4 46.3 46.0 45.6 45.2 44.9 44.5

REG DIST : guiage07.prn

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 91 75 50 22222 22222222 2 11 095. 22212222

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural interstate TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045

AVERAGE SPEED : 59 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural principle arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural other principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053

AVERAGE SPEED : 57 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 45 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural major collector TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural major collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057

AVERAGE SPEED : 47 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural minor collector TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural minor collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 46 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Rural local TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Rural local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

AVERAGE SPEED : 44 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban interstate TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban interstate mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051

AVERAGE SPEED : 60 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban freeway TDM Q4CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban freeway mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054

AVERAGE SPEED : 54 Non-Ramp 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban principle arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban principle arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 40 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban minor arterial TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban minor arterial mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ******** SCENARIO RECORD : Urban collector TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban collector mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059

AVERAGE SPEED : 38 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30

************ SCENARIO SECTION ********SCENARIO RECORD : Urban local TDM Q4 CALENDAR YEAR : 2010 EVALUATION MONTH : 1

> Urban local mix and speeds

VMT FRACTIONS : 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056

AVERAGE SPEED : 37 Arterial 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 85.1 84.6 84.1 79.4 73.9 69.0 64.8 62.9 62.0 61.6 63.0 66.3 70.8 74.4 76.1 78.0 78.6 80.5 80.7 81.2 82.1 82.3 82.7 83.6

BAROMETRIC PRES : 30 END OF RUN : 

# 6.2 MOBILE6.2 Output Files

6.2.1 2009 Mobile6.2 Output Files for PM2.5 6.2.1.1 Catawba County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Output File for PM2.5

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: CAT09P.IN (file 1, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM- Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3439 0.3529 0.1202 0.0519 0.0003 0.0018 0.1239 0.0051 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0054 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0143 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0073 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0007 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1759 0.0143 0.0278 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0026Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1878 0.0206 0.0357 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0124 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0882

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3695 0.3794 0.1293 0.0337 0.0004 0.0019 0.0804 0.0054 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0049 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0093 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0048 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1758 0.0143 0.0196 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0024 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1876 0.0206 0.0273 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0110 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0924

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM- Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0037 0.0040 0.0042 0.0041 0.0411 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0046 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0066 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0034 SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0006 0.0005 0.0013 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0041 0.0046 0.0047 0.0046 0.0424 0.0743 0.0675 0.1758 0.0143 0.0153 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0121 0.0120 0.0499 0.0817 0.0748 0.1876 0.0206 0.0229 SO2: 0.0068 0.0087 0.0114 0.0094 0.0168 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0102 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0947

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM- Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3926 0.4031 0.1375 0.0173 0.0004 0.0020 0.0413 0.0058 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0037 0.0040 0.0042 0.0041 0.0411 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0045 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1148 ------ 0.0048 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0588 ------ 0.0025 SO4: 0.0003 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0014 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0041 0.0046 0.0047 0.0046 0.0425 0.0743 0.0675 0.1762 0.0143 0.0124 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0022Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0121 0.0119 0.0500 0.0817 0.0748 0.1881 0.0206 0.0199 SO2: 0.0068 0.0087 0.0114 0.0094 0.0168 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0097 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0962

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM- Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3963 0.4066 0.1387 0.0148 0.0004 0.0021 0.0354 0.0058 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0044 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1145 ------ 0.0041 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0585 ------ 0.0022 SO4: 0.0003 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0046 0.0047 0.0046 0.0425 0.0743 0.0675 0.1756 0.0143 0.0112 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0022 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0121 0.0119 0.0500 0.0817 0.0748 0.1874 0.0206 0.0187 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0168 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0095 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0968

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3868 0.3971 0.1354 0.0214 0.0004 0.0020 0.0512 0.0057 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0037 0.0040 0.0042 0.0041 0.0411 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0046 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0059 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0031 SO4: 0.0003 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0014 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0041 0.0046 0.0047 0.0046 0.0425 0.0743 0.0675 0.1759 0.0143 0.0142 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0022 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0121 0.0119 0.0500 0.0817 0.0748 0.1877 0.0206 0.0217 SO2: 0.0068 0.0087 0.0114 0.0094 0.0168 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0100 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0952

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural-Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3027 0.3107 0.1060 0.0810 0.0003 0.0016 0.1933 0.0045 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0062 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0222 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0114 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0009 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1759 0.0143 0.0408 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0029Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1877 0.0206 0.0490 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0147 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0816

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0985 0.0053 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0051 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1145 ------ 0.0114 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0059 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1758 0.0143 0.0230 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0024 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1876 0.0206 0.0308 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0116 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0907

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3664 0.3763 0.1283 0.0358 0.0004 0.0019 0.0855 0.0054 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0050 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0099 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0051 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1759 0.0143 0.0206 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0024 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1877 0.0206 0.0283 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0112 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0919

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3823 0.3924 0.1338 0.0246 0.0004 0.0020 0.0589 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0047 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1147 ------ 0.0068 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0587 ------ 0.0035 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1760 0.0143 0.0156 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1878 0.0206 0.0232 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0103 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0945

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3817 0.3919 0.1336 0.0251 0.0004 0.0020 0.0597 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0047 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0069 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0036 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1758 0.0143 0.0158 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1876 0.0206 0.0234 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0103 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0944

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3801 0.3902 0.1331 0.0262 0.0004 0.0020 0.0625 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0047 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1147 ------ 0.0072 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0587 ------ 0.0038 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1760 0.0143 0.0163 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1878 0.0206 0.0239 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0104 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0942

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3439 0.3529 0.1202 0.0519 0.0003 0.0018 0.1239 0.0051 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0054 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0143 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0073 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0007 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1759 0.0143 0.0278 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0026Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1878 0.0206 0.0357 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0124 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0882

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural-Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3695 0.3794 0.1293 0.0337 0.0004 0.0019 0.0804 0.0054 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0049 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0093 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0048 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1758 0.0143 0.0196 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0024 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1876 0.0206 0.0273 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0110 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0924

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural- Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0037 0.0040 0.0042 0.0041 0.0411 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0046 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0066 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0034 SO4: 0.0003 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0014 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0041 0.0046 0.0047 0.0046 0.0425 0.0743 0.0675 0.1758 0.0143 0.0153 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0121 0.0119 0.0500 0.0817 0.0748 0.1876 0.0206 0.0229 SO2: 0.0068 0.0087 0.0114 0.0094 0.0168 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0102 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0947

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural-Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3926 0.4031 0.1375 0.0173 0.0004 0.0020 0.0413 0.0058 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0411 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0045 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1148 ------ 0.0048 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0588 ------ 0.0025 SO4: 0.0003 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0046 0.0047 0.0046 0.0425 0.0743 0.0675 0.1762 0.0143 0.0123 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0022Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0121 0.0119 0.0500 0.0817 0.0748 0.1881 0.0206 0.0199 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0168 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0097 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0962

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3963 0.4066 0.1387 0.0148 0.0004 0.0021 0.0354 0.0058 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0037 0.0040 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0044 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1145 ------ 0.0041 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0585 ------ 0.0022 SO4: 0.0003 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0014 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0041 0.0046 0.0047 0.0046 0.0425 0.0743 0.0675 0.1756 0.0143 0.0112 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0022 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0121 0.0119 0.0500 0.0817 0.0748 0.1874 0.0206 0.0187 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0114 0.0094 0.0168 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0095 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0968

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3868 0.3971 0.1354 0.0214 0.0004 0.0020 0.0512 0.0057 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0037 0.0040 0.0042 0.0041 0.0411 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0046 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0059 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0031 SO4: 0.0003 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0014 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0041 0.0046 0.0047 0.0046 0.0425 0.0743 0.0675 0.1759 0.0143 0.0142 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0022 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0121 0.0119 0.0500 0.0817 0.0748 0.1877 0.0206 0.0217 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0114 0.0094 0.0168 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0100 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0952

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

# 6.2.1.2 Davidson County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Output File for PM2.5

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: DV09P.IN (file 1, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3027 0.3107 0.1060 0.0810 0.0003 0.0016 0.1933 0.0045 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0062 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0222 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0114 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0009 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1759 0.0143 0.0408 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0029 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1877 0.0206 0.0490 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0147 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0816

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0985 0.0053 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0051 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1145 ------ 0.0114 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0059 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1758 0.0143 0.0230 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0024 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1876 0.0206 0.0308 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0116 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0907

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3664 0.3763 0.1283 0.0358 0.0004 0.0019 0.0855 0.0054 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0050 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0099 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0051 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1759 0.0143 0.0206 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0024Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1877 0.0206 0.0283 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0112 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0919

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3823 0.3924 0.1338 0.0246 0.0004 0.0020 0.0589 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0047 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1147 ------ 0.0068 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0587 ------ 0.0035 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1760 0.0143 0.0156 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1878 0.0206 0.0232 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0103 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0945

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3817 0.3919 0.1336 0.0251 0.0004 0.0020 0.0597 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0047 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0069 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0036 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1758 0.0143 0.0158 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1876 0.0206 0.0234 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0103 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0944

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3801 0.3902 0.1331 0.0262 0.0004 0.0020 0.0625 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0047 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1147 ------ 0.0072 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0587 ------ 0.0038 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1760 0.0143 0.0163 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1878 0.0206 0.0239 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0104 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0942

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3439 0.3529 0.1202 0.0519 0.0003 0.0018 0.1239 0.0051 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0054 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0143 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0073 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0007 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1759 0.0143 0.0278 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0026 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1878 0.0206 0.0357 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0124 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0882

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3695 0.3794 0.1293 0.0337 0.0004 0.0019 0.0804 0.0054 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0049 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0093 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0048 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1758 0.0143 0.0196 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0024 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1876 0.0206 0.0273 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0110 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0924

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0047 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0066 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0034 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1758 0.0143 0.0153 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1876 0.0206 0.0228 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0102 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0947

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3926 0.4031 0.1375 0.0173 0.0004 0.0020 0.0413 0.0058 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0045 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1148 ------ 0.0048 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0588 ------ 0.0025 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1762 0.0143 0.0123 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0022 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1881 0.0206 0.0198 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0097 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0962

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3963 0.4066 0.1387 0.0148 0.0004 0.0021 0.0354 0.0058 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0044 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1145 ------ 0.0041 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0585 ------ 0.0022 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1756 0.0143 0.0112 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0022 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1874 0.0206 0.0187 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0095 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0968

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3868 0.3971 0.1354 0.0214 0.0004 0.0020 0.0512 0.0057 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0046 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0059 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0031 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1759 0.0143 0.0142 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0022Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1877 0.0206 0.0217 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0100 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0952

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate - Non Modeled * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3027 0.3107 0.1060 0.0810 0.0003 0.0016 0.1933 0.0045 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0062 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0222 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0114 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0009 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1759 0.0143 0.0408 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0029 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1877 0.0206 0.0490 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0147 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0816

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial - Non Modeled * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0985 0.0053 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0051 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1145 ------ 0.0114 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0059 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1758 0.0143 0.0230 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0024 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1876 0.0206 0.0308 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0116 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0907

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial - Non Modeled * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3664 0.3763 0.1283 0.0358 0.0004 0.0019 0.0855 0.0054 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0050 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0099 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0051 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1759 0.0143 0.0206 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0024Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1877 0.0206 0.0283 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0112 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0919

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector - Non Modeled * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3823 0.3924 0.1338 0.0246 0.0004 0.0020 0.0589 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0047 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1147 ------ 0.0068 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0587 ------ 0.0035 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1760 0.0143 0.0156 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1878 0.0206 0.0232 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0103 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0945

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector - Non Modeled * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3817 0.3919 0.1336 0.0251 0.0004 0.0020 0.0597 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0047 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0069 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0036 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1758 0.0143 0.0158 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1876 0.0206 0.0234 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0103 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0944

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local - Non Modeled * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3801 0.3902 0.1331 0.0262 0.0004 0.0020 0.0625 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0047 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1147 ------ 0.0072 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0587 ------ 0.0038 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1760 0.0143 0.0163 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1878 0.0206 0.0239 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0104 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0942

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate - Non Modeled * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 19. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3439 0.3529 0.1202 0.0519 0.0003 0.0018 0.1239 0.0051 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0054 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0143 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0073 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0007 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1759 0.0143 0.0278 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0026 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1878 0.0206 0.0357 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0124 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0882

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway - Non Modeled * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 20. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3695 0.3794 0.1293 0.0337 0.0004 0.0019 0.0804 0.0054 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0049 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0093 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0048 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0047 0.0046 0.0426 0.0743 0.0675 0.1758 0.0143 0.0196 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0024 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0120 0.0119 0.0501 0.0817 0.0748 0.1876 0.0206 0.0273 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0167 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0110 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0924

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial - Non Modeled * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 21. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0037 0.0040 0.0042 0.0041 0.0411 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0046 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0066 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0034 SO4: 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0014 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0041 0.0046 0.0047 0.0046 0.0425 0.0743 0.0675 0.1758 0.0143 0.0153 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0121 0.0120 0.0500 0.0817 0.0748 0.1876 0.0206 0.0229 SO2: 0.0068 0.0087 0.0114 0.0094 0.0168 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0102 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0947

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial - Non Modeled * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 22. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3926 0.4031 0.1375 0.0173 0.0004 0.0020 0.0413 0.0058 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0411 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0045 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1148 ------ 0.0048 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0588 ------ 0.0025 SO4: 0.0003 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0046 0.0047 0.0046 0.0425 0.0743 0.0675 0.1762 0.0143 0.0123 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0022 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0121 0.0119 0.0500 0.0817 0.0748 0.1881 0.0206 0.0199 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0168 0.0086 0.0160 0.0380 0.0033 0.0097 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0962

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector - Non Modeled * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 23. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3963 0.4066 0.1387 0.0148 0.0004 0.0021 0.0354 0.0058 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0037 0.0040 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0044 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1145 ------ 0.0041 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0585 ------ 0.0022 SO4: 0.0003 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0014 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0041 0.0046 0.0047 0.0046 0.0425 0.0743 0.0675 0.1756 0.0143 0.0112 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0022 Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0121 0.0119 0.0500 0.0817 0.0748 0.1874 0.0206 0.0187 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0114 0.0094 0.0168 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0095 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0968

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local - Non Modeled * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 24. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3868 0.3971 0.1354 0.0214 0.0004 0.0020 0.0512 0.0057 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0041 0.0042 0.0041 0.0410 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0046 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0576 0.0273 0.1146 ------ 0.0059 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0163 0.0393 0.0586 ------ 0.0031 SO4: 0.0003 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0015 0.0004 0.0008 0.0027 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0046 0.0047 0.0046 0.0425 0.0743 0.0675 0.1759 0.0143 0.0142 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0022Total PM: 0.0114 0.0119 0.0121 0.0119 0.0500 0.0817 0.0748 0.1877 0.0206 0.0217 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0094 0.0168 0.0086 0.0160 0.0379 0.0033 0.0100 NH3: 0.1017 0.1005 0.1000 0.1004 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0952

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

# 6.2.1.3 Guilford County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Output Files for PM2.5

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: GU09P.IN (file 1, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3027 0.3107 0.1059 0.0802 0.0003 0.0016 0.1941 0.0045 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0358 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0057 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0524 0.0235 0.0881 ------ 0.0172 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0148 0.0338 0.0452 ------ 0.0088 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0017 0.0004 0.0008 0.0026 0.0001 0.0009 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0044 0.0045 0.0374 0.0676 0.0581 0.1360 0.0143 0.0327 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0029 Total PM: 0.0113 0.0118 0.0117 0.0118 0.0449 0.0750 0.0654 0.1478 0.0206 0.0409 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0095 0.0166 0.0085 0.0160 0.0378 0.0033 0.0147 NH3: 0.1017 0.1006 0.1008 0.1006 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0816

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3588 0.3684 0.1255 0.0409 0.0003 0.0019 0.0989 0.0053 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0358 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0049 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0524 0.0235 0.0881 ------ 0.0088 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0148 0.0338 0.0453 ------ 0.0045 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0017 0.0004 0.0008 0.0026 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0044 0.0045 0.0375 0.0676 0.0581 0.1360 0.0143 0.0188 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0024 Total PM: 0.0113 0.0118 0.0117 0.0118 0.0449 0.0750 0.0654 0.1478 0.0206 0.0266 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0095 0.0166 0.0085 0.0160 0.0378 0.0033 0.0116 NH3: 0.1017 0.1006 0.1008 0.1006 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0908

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3664 0.3763 0.1283 0.0355 0.0004 0.0019 0.0858 0.0054 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0358 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0048 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0524 0.0235 0.0881 ------ 0.0076 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0148 0.0338 0.0452 ------ 0.0040 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0017 0.0004 0.0008 0.0026 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0044 0.0045 0.0375 0.0676 0.0581 0.1360 0.0143 0.0169 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0024Total PM: 0.0113 0.0118 0.0117 0.0118 0.0449 0.0750 0.0654 0.1478 0.0206 0.0247 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0095 0.0166 0.0085 0.0160 0.0378 0.0033 0.0112 NH3: 0.1017 0.1006 0.1008 0.1006 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0920

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3823 0.3924 0.1338 0.0244 0.0004 0.0020 0.0591 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0358 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0045 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0524 0.0235 0.0882 ------ 0.0053 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0148 0.0338 0.0453 ------ 0.0028 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0017 0.0004 0.0008 0.0026 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0044 0.0045 0.0375 0.0676 0.0581 0.1361 0.0143 0.0131 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023 Total PM: 0.0113 0.0118 0.0117 0.0118 0.0449 0.0750 0.0654 0.1479 0.0206 0.0207 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0095 0.0166 0.0085 0.0160 0.0378 0.0033 0.0103 NH3: 0.1017 0.1006 0.1008 0.1006 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0946

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3817 0.3919 0.1336 0.0248 0.0004 0.0020 0.0600 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0358 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0045 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0524 0.0235 0.0881 ------ 0.0054 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0148 0.0338 0.0452 ------ 0.0028 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0017 0.0004 0.0008 0.0026 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0044 0.0045 0.0374 0.0676 0.0581 0.1360 0.0143 0.0132 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023 Total PM: 0.0113 0.0118 0.0117 0.0118 0.0449 0.0750 0.0654 0.1478 0.0206 0.0208 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0095 0.0166 0.0085 0.0160 0.0378 0.0033 0.0103 NH3: 0.1017 0.1006 0.1008 0.1006 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0945

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3801 0.3902 0.1330 0.0259 0.0004 0.0020 0.0628 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0358 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0045 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0524 0.0235 0.0882 ------ 0.0056 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0148 0.0338 0.0453 ------ 0.0029 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0017 0.0004 0.0008 0.0026 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0044 0.0045 0.0375 0.0676 0.0581 0.1361 0.0143 0.0136 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023Total PM: 0.0113 0.0118 0.0117 0.0118 0.0450 0.0750 0.0654 0.1479 0.0206 0.0212 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0095 0.0166 0.0085 0.0160 0.0378 0.0033 0.0104 NH3: 0.1017 0.1006 0.1008 0.1006 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0943

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3439 0.3529 0.1202 0.0514 0.0003 0.0018 0.1244 0.0051 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0358 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0051 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0524 0.0235 0.0882 ------ 0.0110 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0148 0.0338 0.0453 ------ 0.0057 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0017 0.0004 0.0008 0.0026 0.0001 0.0007 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0044 0.0045 0.0375 0.0676 0.0581 0.1361 0.0143 0.0226 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0026 Total PM: 0.0113 0.0118 0.0117 0.0118 0.0449 0.0750 0.0654 0.1479 0.0206 0.0304 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0095 0.0166 0.0085 0.0160 0.0378 0.0033 0.0124 NH3: 0.1017 0.1006 0.1008 0.1006 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0883

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3695 0.3794 0.1293 0.0334 0.0004 0.0019 0.0807 0.0054 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0358 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0047 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0524 0.0235 0.0881 ------ 0.0072 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0148 0.0338 0.0452 ------ 0.0037 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0017 0.0004 0.0008 0.0026 0.0001 0.0006 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0044 0.0045 0.0375 0.0676 0.0581 0.1360 0.0143 0.0162 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0024 Total PM: 0.0113 0.0118 0.0117 0.0118 0.0449 0.0750 0.0654 0.1478 0.0206 0.0239 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0095 0.0166 0.0085 0.0160 0.0378 0.0033 0.0110 NH3: 0.1017 0.1006 0.1008 0.1006 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0925

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0237 0.0004 0.0020 0.0573 0.0056 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0358 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0045 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0524 0.0235 0.0882 ------ 0.0051 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0148 0.0338 0.0452 ------ 0.0027 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0017 0.0004 0.0008 0.0026 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0044 0.0045 0.0374 0.0676 0.0581 0.1360 0.0143 0.0128 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0023Total PM: 0.0113 0.0118 0.0117 0.0118 0.0449 0.0750 0.0654 0.1478 0.0206 0.0204 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0095 0.0166 0.0085 0.0160 0.0378 0.0033 0.0102 NH3: 0.1017 0.1006 0.1008 0.1006 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0948

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3926 0.4031 0.1375 0.0171 0.0004 0.0021 0.0415 0.0058 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0358 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0043 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0524 0.0235 0.0883 ------ 0.0037 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0148 0.0338 0.0454 ------ 0.0020 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0017 0.0004 0.0008 0.0026 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0044 0.0045 0.0375 0.0676 0.0581 0.1363 0.0143 0.0105 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0022 Total PM: 0.0113 0.0118 0.0117 0.0118 0.0450 0.0750 0.0654 0.1481 0.0206 0.0180 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0095 0.0166 0.0085 0.0160 0.0378 0.0033 0.0097 NH3: 0.1017 0.1006 0.1008 0.1006 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0963

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3963 0.4066 0.1387 0.0147 0.0004 0.0021 0.0355 0.0058 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0358 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0043 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0524 0.0235 0.0881 ------ 0.0032 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0148 0.0338 0.0451 ------ 0.0017 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0017 0.0004 0.0008 0.0026 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0044 0.0045 0.0374 0.0676 0.0581 0.1358 0.0143 0.0096 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0022 Total PM: 0.0113 0.0118 0.0117 0.0118 0.0449 0.0750 0.0654 0.1476 0.0206 0.0171 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0095 0.0166 0.0085 0.0160 0.0378 0.0033 0.0095 NH3: 0.1017 0.1006 0.1008 0.1006 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0969

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local - TDM * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Gasoline Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm Diesel Fuel Sulfur Content: 43. ppm Particle Size Cutoff: 2.50 Microns Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3868 0.3971 0.1354 0.0212 0.0004 0.0020 0.0514 0.0057 1.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Lead: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0000 0.0000 GASPM: 0.0038 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0358 ------ ------ --- --- 0.0142 0.0044 ECARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0524 0.0235 0.0881 ------ 0.0046 OCARBON: ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 0.0148 0.0338 0.0453 ------ 0.0024 SO4: 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0017 0.0004 0.0008 0.0026 0.0001 0.0005 Total Exhaust PM: 0.0040 0.0045 0.0044 0.0045 0.0375 0.0676 0.0581 0.1360 0.0143 0.0119 Brake: 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 0.0053 Tire: 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0022 0.0020 0.0020 0.0065 0.0010 0.0022Total PM: 0.0113 0.0118 0.0117 0.0118 0.0449 0.0750 0.0654 0.1478 0.0206 0.0195 SO2: 0.0068 0.0088 0.0115 0.0095 0.0166 0.0085 0.0160 0.0378 0.0033 0.0100 NH3: 0.1017 0.1006 0.1008 0.1006 0.0451 0.0068 0.0068 0.0270 0.0113 0.0954

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------



# 6.2.2 2009 MOBILE6.2 Output Files for NOx 6.2.2.1 Catawba County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Output Files for NOx

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: CAT091.IN (file 1, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM- Q 1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0521 0.0003 0.0018 0.1241 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.780 1.328 1.410 1.349 3.678 0.889 1.160 11.477 2.37 2.536

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg)Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.771 1.315 1.397 1.336 3.610 0.812 1.059 10.547 2.25 1.991

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM- Q 1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.732 1.265 1.354 1.288 2.892 0.578 0.751 6.892 1.67 1.434

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM- Q 1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%)Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.722 1.250 1.337 1.272 2.940 0.568 0.739 6.774 1.70 1.298

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM- Q 1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.711 1.234 1.319 1.255 3.036 0.561 0.729 6.693 1.76 1.246

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%)Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.722 1.250 1.337 1.272 2.938 0.568 0.739 6.780 1.70 1.417

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate mix and speeds Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0806 0.0003 0.0016 0.1918 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.796 1.350 1.432 1.371 3.798 1.083 1.414 13.806 2.57 3.783

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F)Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.740 1.272 1.355 1.293 3.370 0.633 0.823 8.381 1.90 1.881

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.731 1.260 1.343 1.281 3.297 0.601 0.782 7.170 1.85 1.671

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: LowMinimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.728 1.256 1.339 1.277 3.275 0.595 0.773 7.094 1.85 1.423

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0569 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.725 1.252 1.336 1.273 3.250 0.588 0.764 7.015 1.84 1.439

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan.Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0327 0.0004 0.0019 0.0777 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.725 1.252 1.336 1.273 3.250 0.588 0.764 7.008 1.84 1.582

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0521 0.0003 0.0018 0.1241 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.790 1.341 1.424 1.362 3.752 1.009 1.317 12.923 2.49 2.731

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.768 1.310 1.392 1.331 3.585 0.785 1.023 10.216 2.21 1.959

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.722 1.250 1.337 1.272 2.938 0.568 0.739 6.779 1.70 1.417

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.713 1.237 1.323 1.258 3.013 0.562 0.730 6.698 1.74 1.286

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.716 1.240 1.326 1.262 2.987 0.563 0.732 6.717 1.73 1.252

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 18.* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.716 1.240 1.326 1.262 2.985 0.563 0.732 6.716 1.73 1.407

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: CAT091N.IN (file 2, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM- Q 1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0521 0.0003 0.0018 0.1241 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):Composite NOX : 0.898 1.495 1.580 1.517 3.678 0.889 1.160 11.477 2.37 2.656

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.888 1.482 1.567 1.503 3.610 0.812 1.059 10.547 2.25 2.119

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM- Q 1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial mix and speeds Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.849 1.435 1.530 1.459 2.892 0.578 0.751 6.892 1.67 1.569

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM- Q 1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.838 1.418 1.512 1.442 2.940 0.568 0.739 6.774 1.70 1.436

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM- Q 1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.825 1.399 1.492 1.423 3.036 0.561 0.729 6.693 1.76 1.383

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.838 1.418 1.512 1.442 2.938 0.568 0.739 6.780 1.70 1.551

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0806 0.0003 0.0016 0.1918 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.915 1.519 1.604 1.540 3.798 1.083 1.414 13.806 2.57 3.890

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.855 1.438 1.525 1.460 3.370 0.633 0.823 8.381 1.90 2.005

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All VehGVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.845 1.425 1.514 1.448 3.297 0.601 0.782 7.170 1.85 1.797

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.842 1.421 1.510 1.444 3.275 0.595 0.773 7.094 1.85 1.555

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0569 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.839 1.417 1.506 1.440 3.250 0.588 0.764 7.015 1.84 1.571

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0327 0.0004 0.0019 0.0777 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.839 1.417 1.506 1.440 3.250 0.588 0.764 7.008 1.84 1.710

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0521 0.0003 0.0018 0.1241 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.909 1.510 1.595 1.531 3.752 1.009 1.317 12.923 2.49 2.851

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.885 1.477 1.562 1.499 3.585 0.785 1.023 10.216 2.21 2.086

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: NoATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.838 1.418 1.512 1.442 2.938 0.568 0.739 6.779 1.70 1.550

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.827 1.403 1.495 1.426 3.013 0.562 0.730 6.698 1.74 1.422

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: NoEvap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.830 1.406 1.499 1.430 2.987 0.563 0.732 6.717 1.73 1.389

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 36.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 54.8 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.4 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 76.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.830 1.406 1.499 1.430 2.985 0.563 0.732 6.716 1.73 1.539

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: CAT092.IN (file 1, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM- Q 2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F)Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.614 1.025 1.059 1.034 3.111 0.854 1.084 10.542 1.82 2.182

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.607 1.015 1.049 1.024 3.053 0.780 0.990 9.683 1.73 1.678

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM- Q 2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F)Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.586 0.978 1.018 0.988 2.446 0.555 0.702 6.350 1.28 1.176

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM- Q 2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.577 0.966 1.004 0.975 2.486 0.546 0.691 6.242 1.31 1.050

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM- Q 2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: LowMinimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.565 0.952 0.989 0.961 2.568 0.539 0.682 6.166 1.35 1.001

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.577 0.966 1.004 0.975 2.485 0.546 0.691 6.247 1.31 1.161

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: JulyAltitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.625 1.043 1.076 1.051 3.212 1.039 1.321 12.694 1.97 3.335

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.584 0.981 1.017 0.990 2.851 0.608 0.770 7.682 1.46 1.583

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.577 0.972 1.007 0.981 2.789 0.578 0.732 6.607 1.42 1.394

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.575 0.969 1.004 0.978 2.771 0.571 0.724 6.537 1.42 1.162

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.573 0.965 1.001 0.975 2.749 0.565 0.715 6.464 1.41 1.177

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0004 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.573 0.965 1.001 0.974 2.749 0.565 0.715 6.457 1.41 1.312

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.621 1.036 1.070 1.045 3.174 0.969 1.231 11.878 1.91 2.360

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.604 1.012 1.046 1.020 3.032 0.754 0.956 9.377 1.70 1.649

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #* Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.577 0.966 1.004 0.975 2.485 0.546 0.691 6.246 1.31 1.161

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.567 0.954 0.992 0.964 2.548 0.540 0.683 6.171 1.34 1.038

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.570 0.957 0.995 0.967 2.527 0.541 0.685 6.189 1.33 1.006

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.570 0.957 0.995 0.967 2.525 0.541 0.685 6.188 1.33 1.152

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: CAT092N.IN (file 4, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.705 1.173 1.188 1.177 3.111 0.854 1.084 10.542 1.82 2.282

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.698 1.163 1.178 1.166 3.053 0.780 0.990 9.683 1.73 1.784

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM-Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.679 1.127 1.150 1.133 2.446 0.555 0.702 6.350 1.28 1.288

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.668 1.113 1.135 1.119 2.486 0.546 0.691 6.242 1.31 1.163

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.655 1.097 1.119 1.103 2.568 0.539 0.682 6.166 1.35 1.114

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.668 1.113 1.135 1.119 2.485 0.546 0.691 6.247 1.31 1.272

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.718 1.192 1.206 1.196 3.212 1.039 1.321 12.694 1.97 3.424

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All VehGVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.674 1.127 1.145 1.132 2.851 0.608 0.770 7.682 1.46 1.686

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.668 1.117 1.136 1.122 2.789 0.578 0.732 6.607 1.42 1.498

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.665 1.114 1.133 1.119 2.771 0.571 0.724 6.537 1.42 1.271

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.663 1.111 1.130 1.115 2.749 0.565 0.715 6.464 1.41 1.286

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0004 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.663 1.111 1.130 1.115 2.749 0.565 0.715 6.457 1.41 1.417

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.713 1.185 1.199 1.189 3.174 0.969 1.231 11.878 1.91 2.460

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: YesReformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.696 1.159 1.174 1.163 3.032 0.754 0.956 9.377 1.70 1.754

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.668 1.113 1.135 1.118 2.485 0.546 0.691 6.246 1.31 1.271

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 16. Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: YesReformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.658 1.100 1.122 1.106 2.548 0.540 0.683 6.171 1.34 1.150

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.660 1.103 1.125 1.109 2.527 0.541 0.685 6.189 1.33 1.120

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 76.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 47.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.3 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.5 psi Weathered RVP: 10.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: NoATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.660 1.103 1.125 1.109 2.525 0.541 0.685 6.188 1.33 1.262

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: CAT093.IN (file 1, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.560 0.921 0.952 0.929 3.216 0.854 1.084 10.542 1.57 2.119

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg)Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.554 0.912 0.943 0.920 3.156 0.780 0.990 9.683 1.49 1.609

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.547 0.882 0.918 0.891 2.529 0.555 0.702 6.350 1.11 1.111

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%)Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.537 0.869 0.905 0.879 2.570 0.546 0.691 6.242 1.13 0.981

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.523 0.855 0.891 0.864 2.655 0.539 0.682 6.166 1.16 0.931

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%)Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.537 0.869 0.905 0.879 2.569 0.546 0.691 6.247 1.13 1.096

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.570 0.937 0.968 0.945 3.320 1.039 1.321 12.694 1.70 3.282

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F)Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.536 0.882 0.914 0.890 2.947 0.608 0.770 7.682 1.26 1.519

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.531 0.873 0.906 0.881 2.882 0.578 0.732 6.607 1.23 1.329

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F)Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.529 0.870 0.903 0.878 2.864 0.571 0.724 6.537 1.22 1.092

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.527 0.867 0.901 0.876 2.841 0.565 0.715 6.464 1.22 1.109

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: JulyAltitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0004 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.527 0.867 0.900 0.876 2.842 0.565 0.715 6.457 1.22 1.246

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.566 0.931 0.962 0.939 3.281 0.969 1.231 11.878 1.65 2.295

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.552 0.909 0.940 0.917 3.134 0.754 0.956 9.377 1.46 1.580

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.537 0.869 0.905 0.879 2.569 0.546 0.691 6.246 1.13 1.095

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 16.* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.526 0.858 0.893 0.867 2.634 0.540 0.683 6.171 1.16 0.969

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.529 0.861 0.896 0.870 2.612 0.541 0.685 6.189 1.15 0.937

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q3* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.529 0.861 0.896 0.870 2.610 0.541 0.685 6.188 1.15 1.086

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: CAT093N.IN (file 1, run 1). * *************************************************************************** * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):Composite NOX : 0.643 1.054 1.069 1.058 3.216 0.854 1.084 10.542 1.57 2.208

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q2 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.637 1.044 1.060 1.048 3.156 0.780 0.990 9.683 1.49 1.704

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.632 1.016 1.038 1.021 2.529 0.555 0.702 6.350 1.11 1.212

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.621 1.002 1.023 1.007 2.570 0.546 0.691 6.242 1.13 1.085

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.606 0.986 1.007 0.992 2.655 0.539 0.682 6.166 1.16 1.034

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.621 1.002 1.023 1.007 2.569 0.546 0.691 6.247 1.13 1.196

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.653 1.071 1.085 1.074 3.320 1.039 1.321 12.694 1.70 3.361

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.618 1.013 1.030 1.017 2.947 0.608 0.770 7.682 1.26 1.612

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.612 1.003 1.022 1.008 2.882 0.578 0.732 6.607 1.23 1.423

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.611 1.000 1.019 1.005 2.864 0.571 0.724 6.537 1.22 1.191

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All VehGVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.609 0.998 1.016 1.002 2.841 0.565 0.715 6.464 1.22 1.207

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0004 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.609 0.998 1.016 1.002 2.842 0.565 0.715 6.457 1.22 1.341

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.649 1.064 1.079 1.068 3.281 0.969 1.231 11.878 1.65 2.385

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.635 1.041 1.056 1.045 3.134 0.754 0.956 9.377 1.46 1.675

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: YesReformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.621 1.002 1.023 1.007 2.569 0.546 0.691 6.246 1.13 1.195

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.609 0.989 1.010 0.995 2.634 0.540 0.683 6.171 1.16 1.071

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: NoATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.612 0.992 1.013 0.998 2.612 0.541 0.685 6.189 1.15 1.040

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q3 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.8 (F) Maximum Temperature: 82.5 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.5 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 88.2 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.8 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.612 0.992 1.013 0.998 2.610 0.541 0.685 6.188 1.15 1.186

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: CAT094.IN (file 7, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM- Q 4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psiWeathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.669 1.179 1.261 1.200 3.275 0.658 1.023 10.274 2.26 2.257

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3670 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0003 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.660 1.167 1.250 1.188 3.214 0.601 0.934 9.429 2.14 1.767

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM- Q 4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg)Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0003 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.625 1.123 1.211 1.145 2.575 0.426 0.662 6.184 1.59 1.269

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM- Q 4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0020 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.617 1.109 1.196 1.131 2.617 0.420 0.651 6.078 1.62 1.147

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM- Q 4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%)Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.607 1.094 1.180 1.116 2.703 0.414 0.643 6.004 1.68 1.101

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0003 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.617 1.109 1.196 1.131 2.616 0.420 0.651 6.083 1.62 1.254

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%)Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.683 1.199 1.281 1.220 3.381 0.802 1.247 12.389 2.45 3.380

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0003 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.633 1.129 1.212 1.150 3.001 0.467 0.726 7.462 1.81 1.666

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F)Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3653 0.3750 0.1279 0.0366 0.0003 0.0019 0.0876 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.625 1.118 1.201 1.139 2.935 0.444 0.690 6.438 1.77 1.483

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3856 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0003 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.622 1.114 1.198 1.136 2.916 0.439 0.682 6.369 1.76 1.260

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F)Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0003 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.619 1.111 1.195 1.132 2.894 0.434 0.674 6.296 1.75 1.274

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3710 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0003 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.619 1.111 1.195 1.132 2.894 0.434 0.674 6.290 1.75 1.403

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: LowMinimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.678 1.191 1.274 1.212 3.341 0.747 1.162 11.587 2.37 2.434

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3670 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0003 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.658 1.163 1.245 1.184 3.192 0.580 0.902 9.129 2.10 1.738

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan.Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0003 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.617 1.109 1.196 1.131 2.616 0.420 0.651 6.082 1.62 1.254

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0020 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.609 1.097 1.183 1.119 2.682 0.415 0.644 6.009 1.66 1.136

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.611 1.100 1.186 1.122 2.659 0.416 0.645 6.026 1.65 1.105

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0003 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.611 1.100 1.186 1.122 2.658 0.416 0.645 6.025 1.65 1.245

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: CAT094N.IN (file 8, run 1). **************************************************************************** * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-TDM- Q 4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0521 0.0003 0.0018 0.1241 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.858 1.426 1.509 1.447 3.639 0.889 1.160 11.477 2.26 2.607

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-TDM-Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.849 1.413 1.496 1.434 3.571 0.812 1.059 10.547 2.14 2.068-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-TDM- Q 4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0003 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.745 1.297 1.386 1.320 2.575 0.426 0.662 6.184 1.59 1.407

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-TDM- Q 4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0020 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):Composite NOX : 0.735 1.281 1.370 1.304 2.617 0.420 0.651 6.078 1.62 1.288

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-TDM- Q 4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.724 1.265 1.352 1.287 2.703 0.414 0.643 6.004 1.68 1.241

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-TDM-Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0003 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.735 1.281 1.370 1.304 2.616 0.420 0.651 6.083 1.62 1.391

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.805 1.374 1.453 1.394 3.381 0.802 1.247 12.389 2.45 3.490

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0003 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.751 1.300 1.382 1.321 3.001 0.467 0.726 7.462 1.81 1.793

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3653 0.3750 0.1279 0.0366 0.0003 0.0019 0.0876 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.742 1.288 1.372 1.310 2.935 0.444 0.690 6.438 1.77 1.612

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------VMT Distribution: 0.3856 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0003 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.740 1.285 1.368 1.306 2.916 0.439 0.682 6.369 1.76 1.395

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0003 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.737 1.281 1.365 1.302 2.894 0.434 0.674 6.296 1.75 1.409

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3710 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0003 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.737 1.281 1.365 1.302 2.894 0.434 0.674 6.290 1.75 1.534

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.800 1.365 1.445 1.386 3.341 0.747 1.162 11.587 2.37 2.558

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway mix and speeds Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3670 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0003 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.778 1.336 1.416 1.356 3.192 0.580 0.902 9.129 2.10 1.869

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial-Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0003 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.735 1.281 1.370 1.304 2.616 0.420 0.651 6.082 1.62 1.390

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0020 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.726 1.268 1.355 1.290 2.682 0.415 0.644 6.009 1.66 1.275

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector- Catawba County-Rural- Q 4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.728 1.271 1.359 1.293 2.659 0.416 0.645 6.026 1.65 1.246

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local- Catawba County-Rural-Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 43.3 (F) Maximum Temperature: 56.0 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 57.9 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: YesReformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0003 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.728 1.271 1.359 1.293 2.658 0.416 0.645 6.025 1.65 1.380

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- 

# 6.2.2.2 Davidson County 2009 MOBI LE6.2 Output Files for NOx

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: DV091.IN (file 1, run 1). * *************************************************************************** * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0806 0.0003 0.0016 0.1918 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.802 1.359 1.442 1.380 3.810 1.083 1.414 13.806 2.59 3.789

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%)Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.785 1.337 1.420 1.358 3.691 0.889 1.160 11.474 2.39 2.251

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.736 1.269 1.353 1.290 3.308 0.601 0.782 7.170 1.87 1.678

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%)Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.736 1.269 1.352 1.290 3.309 0.601 0.782 7.173 1.87 1.438

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0569 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.748 1.285 1.368 1.306 3.404 0.644 0.838 7.696 1.94 1.508

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F)Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0327 0.0004 0.0019 0.0777 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.742 1.277 1.360 1.298 3.356 0.620 0.807 7.399 1.90 1.635

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 7. Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0521 0.0003 0.0018 0.1241 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.802 1.359 1.442 1.380 3.810 1.083 1.414 13.813 2.59 2.857

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F)Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.760 1.302 1.385 1.323 3.502 0.705 0.917 9.247 2.06 1.866

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.723 1.252 1.337 1.273 3.209 0.573 0.745 6.838 1.84 1.428

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F)Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.723 1.252 1.337 1.273 3.210 0.573 0.745 6.834 1.84 1.307

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.717 1.244 1.329 1.265 3.142 0.565 0.735 6.745 1.81 1.258

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: LowMinimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.733 1.265 1.349 1.286 3.284 0.595 0.773 7.101 1.86 1.456

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate Rural * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0806 0.0003 0.0016 0.1918 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.802 1.359 1.442 1.380 3.810 1.083 1.414 13.806 2.59 3.789

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial Rural * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan.Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.736 1.269 1.352 1.290 3.309 0.601 0.782 8.004 1.87 1.838

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial Rural * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.733 1.265 1.349 1.286 3.285 0.595 0.773 7.091 1.86 1.667

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector Rural * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.733 1.265 1.349 1.286 3.286 0.595 0.773 7.094 1.86 1.430

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector Rural * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0569 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.730 1.261 1.345 1.282 3.261 0.588 0.764 7.015 1.85 1.446

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local Rural * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0327 0.0004 0.0019 0.0777 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.730 1.261 1.345 1.282 3.261 0.588 0.764 7.008 1.85 1.589

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate Rural * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 19. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0521 0.0003 0.0018 0.1241 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.792 1.346 1.429 1.367 3.741 0.970 1.266 12.457 2.47 2.675

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway Rural * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 20.* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.773 1.319 1.402 1.340 3.597 0.785 1.023 10.216 2.23 1.966

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial Rural * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 21. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.732 1.267 1.355 1.289 2.926 0.573 0.745 6.833 1.70 1.432

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial Rural* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 22. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.718 1.246 1.332 1.268 3.023 0.562 0.730 6.698 1.76 1.293

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector Rural * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 23. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.720 1.249 1.335 1.271 2.997 0.563 0.732 6.717 1.74 1.259

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #* Urban local Rural * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 24. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.718 1.246 1.332 1.268 3.021 0.562 0.730 6.704 1.76 1.411

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: DV091N.IN (file 2, run 1). * *************************************************************************** * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0806 0.0003 0.0016 0.1918 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):Composite NOX : 0.921 1.529 1.614 1.551 3.810 1.083 1.414 13.806 2.59 3.897

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.904 1.506 1.591 1.527 3.691 0.889 1.160 11.474 2.39 2.377

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.851 1.435 1.524 1.458 3.308 0.601 0.782 7.170 1.87 1.804

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.851 1.435 1.524 1.458 3.309 0.601 0.782 7.173 1.87 1.571

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0569 0.0056 1.0000-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.864 1.452 1.539 1.474 3.404 0.644 0.838 7.696 1.94 1.641

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0327 0.0004 0.0019 0.0777 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.857 1.443 1.532 1.466 3.356 0.620 0.807 7.399 1.90 1.764

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0521 0.0003 0.0018 0.1241 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.921 1.529 1.614 1.551 3.810 1.083 1.414 13.813 2.59 2.979

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.877 1.469 1.555 1.491 3.502 0.705 0.917 9.247 2.06 1.994

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.838 1.418 1.509 1.441 3.209 0.573 0.745 6.838 1.84 1.561

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.838 1.418 1.509 1.441 3.210 0.573 0.745 6.834 1.84 1.443

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All VehGVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.831 1.410 1.501 1.433 3.142 0.565 0.735 6.745 1.81 1.395

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.848 1.431 1.521 1.454 3.284 0.595 0.773 7.101 1.86 1.589

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate Rural * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0806 0.0003 0.0016 0.1918 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.921 1.529 1.614 1.551 3.810 1.083 1.414 13.806 2.59 3.897

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial Rural * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.851 1.435 1.524 1.458 3.309 0.601 0.782 8.004 1.87 1.962

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial Rural * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.848 1.431 1.521 1.454 3.285 0.595 0.773 7.091 1.86 1.794

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector Rural * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.848 1.431 1.520 1.454 3.286 0.595 0.773 7.094 1.86 1.563

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector Rural * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: NoATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0569 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.845 1.427 1.517 1.450 3.261 0.588 0.764 7.015 1.85 1.578

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local Rural * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0327 0.0004 0.0019 0.0777 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.845 1.427 1.517 1.450 3.261 0.588 0.764 7.008 1.85 1.717

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate Rural * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 19. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: NoEvap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0521 0.0003 0.0018 0.1241 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.911 1.515 1.601 1.537 3.741 0.970 1.266 12.457 2.47 2.796

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway Rural * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 20. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.890 1.487 1.573 1.509 3.597 0.785 1.023 10.216 2.23 2.094

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial Rural * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 21. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppmExhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.849 1.436 1.531 1.460 2.926 0.573 0.745 6.833 1.70 1.567

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial Rural * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 22. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.833 1.413 1.506 1.436 3.023 0.562 0.730 6.698 1.76 1.430

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector Rural * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 23. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppmExhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.835 1.416 1.510 1.440 2.997 0.563 0.732 6.717 1.74 1.397

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local Rural * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 24. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.833 1.413 1.506 1.436 3.021 0.562 0.730 6.704 1.76 1.544

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: DV092.IN (file 3, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F)Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.627 1.046 1.079 1.055 3.243 1.039 1.321 12.694 1.98 3.340

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.615 1.028 1.062 1.037 3.141 0.854 1.084 10.539 1.83 1.914

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: LowMinimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.579 0.975 1.011 0.984 2.815 0.578 0.732 6.607 1.43 1.397

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector mix and speeds Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.579 0.975 1.011 0.984 2.816 0.578 0.732 6.610 1.43 1.171

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.588 0.988 1.023 0.997 2.897 0.619 0.784 7.093 1.49 1.235

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0004 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.584 0.981 1.017 0.990 2.856 0.596 0.755 6.819 1.45 1.356

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.627 1.046 1.079 1.054 3.243 1.039 1.321 12.700 1.98 2.473

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.597 1.001 1.036 1.010 2.980 0.677 0.858 8.482 1.58 1.562

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 9.* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.571 0.962 0.998 0.971 2.731 0.551 0.697 6.301 1.41 1.166

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.571 0.962 0.998 0.971 2.732 0.551 0.697 6.296 1.41 1.051

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q2* File 3, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.566 0.955 0.992 0.965 2.674 0.543 0.687 6.214 1.39 1.007

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.577 0.972 1.008 0.981 2.794 0.571 0.724 6.543 1.43 1.190

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #* Rural interstate Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.627 1.046 1.079 1.055 3.243 1.039 1.321 12.694 1.98 3.340

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.579 0.975 1.011 0.984 2.815 0.578 0.732 7.334 1.43 1.542

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.577 0.972 1.008 0.981 2.795 0.571 0.724 6.534 1.43 1.388

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.577 0.972 1.008 0.981 2.797 0.571 0.724 6.537 1.43 1.165

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.575 0.969 1.005 0.978 2.775 0.565 0.715 6.464 1.42 1.181

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0004 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.575 0.969 1.005 0.978 2.775 0.565 0.715 6.457 1.42 1.315-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 19. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.620 1.036 1.069 1.044 3.183 0.932 1.184 11.447 1.89 2.306

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 20. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):Composite NOX : 0.606 1.015 1.049 1.023 3.061 0.754 0.956 9.377 1.71 1.652

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 21. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.583 0.975 1.014 0.985 2.490 0.550 0.697 6.296 1.30 1.171

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 22. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.569 0.958 0.995 0.967 2.572 0.540 0.683 6.171 1.35 1.041

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 23. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.572 0.960 0.998 0.970 2.551 0.541 0.685 6.189 1.34 1.009

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 24. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.569 0.958 0.996 0.967 2.571 0.540 0.683 6.176 1.35 1.153

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: DV092.IN (file 3, run 1). * *************************************************************************** * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.627 1.046 1.079 1.055 3.243 1.039 1.321 12.694 1.98 3.340

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.615 1.028 1.062 1.037 3.141 0.854 1.084 10.539 1.83 1.914

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.579 0.975 1.011 0.984 2.815 0.578 0.732 6.607 1.43 1.397

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: YesReformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.579 0.975 1.011 0.984 2.816 0.578 0.732 6.610 1.43 1.171

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.588 0.988 1.023 0.997 2.897 0.619 0.784 7.093 1.49 1.235

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: YesATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0004 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.584 0.981 1.017 0.990 2.856 0.596 0.755 6.819 1.45 1.356

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.627 1.046 1.079 1.054 3.243 1.039 1.321 12.700 1.98 2.473

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppmExhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.597 1.001 1.036 1.010 2.980 0.677 0.858 8.482 1.58 1.562

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.571 0.962 0.998 0.971 2.731 0.551 0.697 6.301 1.41 1.166

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppmExhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.571 0.962 0.998 0.971 2.732 0.551 0.697 6.296 1.41 1.051

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.566 0.955 0.992 0.965 2.674 0.543 0.687 6.214 1.39 1.007

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psiFuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.577 0.972 1.008 0.981 2.794 0.571 0.724 6.543 1.43 1.190

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.627 1.046 1.079 1.055 3.243 1.039 1.321 12.694 1.98 3.340

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psiWeathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.579 0.975 1.011 0.984 2.815 0.578 0.732 7.334 1.43 1.542

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.577 0.972 1.008 0.981 2.795 0.571 0.724 6.534 1.43 1.388

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg)Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.577 0.972 1.008 0.981 2.797 0.571 0.724 6.537 1.43 1.165

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.575 0.969 1.005 0.978 2.775 0.565 0.715 6.464 1.42 1.181

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%)Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0004 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.575 0.969 1.005 0.978 2.775 0.565 0.715 6.457 1.42 1.315

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 19. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.620 1.036 1.069 1.044 3.183 0.932 1.184 11.447 1.89 2.306

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 20. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%)Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.606 1.015 1.049 1.023 3.061 0.754 0.956 9.377 1.71 1.652

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 21. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.583 0.975 1.014 0.985 2.490 0.550 0.697 6.296 1.30 1.171

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 22. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F)Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.569 0.958 0.995 0.967 2.572 0.540 0.683 6.171 1.35 1.041

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 23. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.572 0.960 0.998 0.970 2.551 0.541 0.685 6.189 1.34 1.009

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local Rural * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 24. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F)Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.569 0.958 0.996 0.967 2.571 0.540 0.683 6.176 1.35 1.153

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: DV093.IN (file 5, run 1). * *************************************************************************** * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.559 0.918 0.947 0.925 3.365 1.039 1.321 12.694 1.66 3.273

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q3* File 5, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.549 0.902 0.932 0.910 3.259 0.854 1.084 10.539 1.53 1.831

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.521 0.855 0.887 0.863 2.921 0.578 0.732 6.607 1.20 1.318

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #* Rural major collector TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.521 0.855 0.887 0.863 2.923 0.578 0.732 6.610 1.20 1.086

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.528 0.866 0.898 0.874 3.007 0.619 0.784 7.093 1.25 1.148

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0004 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.524 0.860 0.892 0.869 2.964 0.596 0.755 6.819 1.22 1.274

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.559 0.918 0.947 0.925 3.365 1.039 1.321 12.700 1.66 2.393

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.535 0.878 0.909 0.886 3.093 0.677 0.858 8.482 1.33 1.480

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.514 0.843 0.876 0.851 2.834 0.551 0.697 6.301 1.18 1.082-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.514 0.843 0.876 0.851 2.835 0.551 0.697 6.296 1.18 0.965

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):Composite NOX : 0.511 0.837 0.871 0.846 2.775 0.543 0.687 6.214 1.17 0.920

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.519 0.852 0.885 0.860 2.900 0.571 0.724 6.543 1.20 1.105

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate Rural * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.559 0.918 0.947 0.925 3.365 1.039 1.321 12.694 1.66 3.273

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial Rural * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.521 0.855 0.887 0.863 2.922 0.578 0.732 7.334 1.20 1.465

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial Rural * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.519 0.852 0.885 0.860 2.901 0.571 0.724 6.534 1.20 1.309

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector Rural * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.519 0.852 0.884 0.860 2.902 0.571 0.724 6.537 1.20 1.079

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector Rural * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.518 0.849 0.882 0.857 2.880 0.565 0.715 6.464 1.19 1.096

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local Rural * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0004 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.518 0.849 0.882 0.857 2.880 0.565 0.715 6.457 1.19 1.234

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate Rural * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 19. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.553 0.909 0.939 0.916 3.304 0.932 1.184 11.447 1.59 2.228

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway Rural * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 20. Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.542 0.890 0.921 0.898 3.177 0.754 0.956 9.377 1.43 1.568

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial Rural * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 21. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.533 0.858 0.893 0.867 2.584 0.550 0.697 6.296 1.09 1.091

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial Rural * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 22. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.517 0.841 0.875 0.849 2.670 0.540 0.683 6.171 1.13 0.957

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector Rural * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 23. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All VehGVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.520 0.843 0.878 0.852 2.647 0.541 0.685 6.189 1.12 0.924

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local Rural * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 24. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.517 0.841 0.875 0.849 2.668 0.540 0.683 6.176 1.13 1.071

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: DV093N.IN (file 6, run 1). * *************************************************************************** * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: NoEvap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.640 1.048 1.062 1.052 3.365 1.039 1.321 12.694 1.66 3.351

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.630 1.032 1.047 1.036 3.259 0.854 1.084 10.539 1.53 1.922

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppmExhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.601 0.982 1.000 0.987 2.921 0.578 0.732 6.607 1.20 1.410

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.601 0.982 1.000 0.987 2.923 0.578 0.732 6.610 1.20 1.183

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppmExhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.608 0.994 1.011 0.999 3.007 0.619 0.784 7.093 1.25 1.245

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0004 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.605 0.988 1.006 0.993 2.964 0.596 0.755 6.819 1.22 1.367

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psiFuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.640 1.048 1.062 1.052 3.365 1.039 1.321 12.700 1.66 2.481

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.615 1.007 1.022 1.011 3.093 0.677 0.858 8.482 1.33 1.572

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psiWeathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.594 0.970 0.989 0.975 2.834 0.551 0.697 6.301 1.18 1.178

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.594 0.971 0.989 0.975 2.835 0.551 0.697 6.296 1.18 1.064

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg)Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.592 0.965 0.985 0.970 2.775 0.543 0.687 6.214 1.17 1.020

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.600 0.980 0.998 0.984 2.900 0.571 0.724 6.543 1.20 1.201

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate Rural * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%)Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.640 1.048 1.062 1.052 3.365 1.039 1.321 12.694 1.66 3.351

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial Rural * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3586 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0004 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.601 0.982 1.000 0.987 2.922 0.578 0.732 7.334 1.20 1.555

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial Rural * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%)Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0367 0.0004 0.0019 0.0875 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.600 0.980 0.998 0.984 2.901 0.571 0.724 6.534 1.20 1.400

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector Rural * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0004 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.600 0.980 0.998 0.984 2.902 0.571 0.724 6.537 1.20 1.176

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector Rural * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F)Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0004 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.598 0.977 0.995 0.981 2.880 0.565 0.715 6.464 1.19 1.192

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local Rural * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0004 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.598 0.977 0.995 0.981 2.880 0.565 0.715 6.457 1.19 1.328

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate Rural * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 19. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F)Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.634 1.039 1.053 1.042 3.304 0.932 1.184 11.447 1.59 2.315

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway Rural * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 20. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0004 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.623 1.019 1.034 1.023 3.177 0.754 0.956 9.377 1.43 1.660

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial Rural * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 21. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: LowMinimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0004 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.616 0.988 1.009 0.993 2.584 0.550 0.697 6.296 1.09 1.189

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial Rural * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 22. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0021 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.598 0.969 0.989 0.974 2.670 0.540 0.683 6.171 1.13 1.057

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector Rural * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 23. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: JulyAltitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.602 0.972 0.993 0.977 2.647 0.541 0.685 6.189 1.12 1.025

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local Rural * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 24. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.598 0.969 0.989 0.974 2.668 0.540 0.683 6.176 1.13 1.168

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: DV094.IN (file 7, run 1). * **************************************************************************** # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.679 1.191 1.273 1.212 3.377 0.802 1.247 12.389 2.43 3.376

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0003 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.665 1.171 1.253 1.192 3.271 0.658 1.023 10.271 2.24 1.989

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3653 0.3750 0.1279 0.0366 0.0003 0.0019 0.0876 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.621 1.111 1.194 1.132 2.932 0.444 0.690 6.438 1.75 1.478

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3856 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0003 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.621 1.111 1.193 1.132 2.933 0.444 0.690 6.441 1.75 1.261-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0003 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.631 1.125 1.208 1.146 3.017 0.476 0.740 6.915 1.82 1.325

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3710 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0003 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):Composite NOX : 0.626 1.118 1.200 1.139 2.974 0.458 0.712 6.645 1.78 1.439

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.679 1.191 1.273 1.212 3.377 0.802 1.247 12.395 2.43 2.537

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3670 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0003 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.642 1.140 1.222 1.161 3.104 0.521 0.809 8.248 1.94 1.642

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0003 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.610 1.096 1.179 1.117 2.844 0.423 0.657 6.136 1.73 1.253

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0020 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.610 1.096 1.179 1.117 2.846 0.423 0.657 6.132 1.73 1.143

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.604 1.088 1.172 1.110 2.785 0.417 0.648 6.051 1.71 1.099

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0003 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.618 1.107 1.190 1.128 2.911 0.439 0.682 6.374 1.75 1.278

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate Rural * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.679 1.191 1.273 1.212 3.377 0.802 1.247 12.389 2.43 3.376

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial Rural * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0003 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.621 1.111 1.193 1.132 2.932 0.444 0.690 7.120 1.75 1.616

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial Rural * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3653 0.3750 0.1279 0.0366 0.0003 0.0019 0.0876 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.618 1.107 1.190 1.128 2.912 0.439 0.682 6.366 1.75 1.468

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector Rural * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All VehGVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3856 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0003 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.618 1.107 1.190 1.128 2.913 0.439 0.682 6.369 1.75 1.254

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector Rural * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0003 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.616 1.103 1.187 1.125 2.890 0.434 0.674 6.296 1.74 1.268

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local Rural * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3710 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0003 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.616 1.103 1.187 1.125 2.890 0.434 0.674 6.290 1.74 1.398

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate Rural * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 19. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.671 1.180 1.262 1.200 3.315 0.718 1.117 11.164 2.32 2.371

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway Rural * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 20. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3670 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0003 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.653 1.156 1.237 1.176 3.188 0.580 0.902 9.129 2.09 1.732

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial Rural * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 21. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0003 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.617 1.108 1.195 1.130 2.593 0.423 0.657 6.131 1.60 1.255

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial Rural * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 22. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: YesReformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0020 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.605 1.090 1.175 1.111 2.679 0.415 0.644 6.009 1.65 1.130

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector Rural * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 23. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.607 1.092 1.178 1.114 2.656 0.416 0.645 6.026 1.64 1.100

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local Rural * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 24. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: YesATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0003 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.605 1.090 1.175 1.111 2.678 0.415 0.644 6.014 1.65 1.237

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: DV094N.IN (file 8, run 1). * *************************************************************************** * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.801 1.365 1.444 1.385 3.377 0.802 1.247 12.389 2.43 3.485

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg)Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0003 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.785 1.344 1.423 1.364 3.271 0.658 1.023 10.271 2.24 2.117

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3653 0.3750 0.1279 0.0366 0.0003 0.0019 0.0876 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.738 1.280 1.363 1.301 2.932 0.444 0.690 6.438 1.75 1.606

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%)Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3856 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0003 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.738 1.280 1.363 1.301 2.933 0.444 0.690 6.441 1.75 1.396

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0003 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.749 1.295 1.377 1.316 3.017 0.476 0.740 6.915 1.82 1.460

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%)Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3710 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0003 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.743 1.287 1.370 1.308 2.974 0.458 0.712 6.645 1.78 1.570

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.801 1.365 1.444 1.385 3.377 0.802 1.247 12.395 2.43 2.660

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F)Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3670 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0003 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.761 1.311 1.391 1.331 3.104 0.521 0.809 8.248 1.94 1.771

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0003 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.726 1.265 1.349 1.286 2.844 0.423 0.657 6.136 1.73 1.386

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F)Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0020 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.726 1.265 1.349 1.286 2.846 0.423 0.657 6.132 1.73 1.281

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.720 1.257 1.342 1.279 2.785 0.417 0.648 6.051 1.71 1.237

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: LowMinimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0003 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.735 1.276 1.360 1.298 2.911 0.439 0.682 6.374 1.75 1.412

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate Rural * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 13. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0804 0.0003 0.0016 0.1920 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.801 1.365 1.444 1.385 3.377 0.802 1.247 12.389 2.43 3.485

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial Rural * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 14. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan.Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1256 0.0413 0.0003 0.0019 0.0986 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.738 1.280 1.363 1.301 2.932 0.444 0.690 7.120 1.75 1.741

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial Rural * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 15. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3653 0.3750 0.1279 0.0366 0.0003 0.0019 0.0876 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.735 1.276 1.360 1.298 2.912 0.439 0.682 6.366 1.75 1.596

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector Rural * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 16. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3856 0.3957 0.1349 0.0224 0.0003 0.0020 0.0534 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.735 1.276 1.360 1.298 2.913 0.439 0.682 6.369 1.75 1.389

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector Rural * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 17. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3936 0.1342 0.0238 0.0003 0.0020 0.0570 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.732 1.273 1.356 1.294 2.890 0.434 0.674 6.296 1.74 1.403

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local Rural * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 18. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3710 0.3810 0.1299 0.0326 0.0003 0.0019 0.0778 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.732 1.273 1.356 1.294 2.890 0.434 0.674 6.290 1.74 1.527

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate Rural * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 19. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0520 0.0003 0.0018 0.1242 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.792 1.353 1.432 1.373 3.315 0.718 1.117 11.164 2.32 2.494

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway Rural * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 20.* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3670 0.3769 0.1286 0.0354 0.0003 0.0019 0.0845 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.773 1.327 1.407 1.347 3.188 0.580 0.902 9.129 2.09 1.862

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial Rural * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 21. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3935 0.1342 0.0239 0.0003 0.0020 0.0571 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.735 1.280 1.369 1.303 2.593 0.423 0.657 6.131 1.60 1.392

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial Rural* File 8, Run 1, Scenario 22. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0163 0.0004 0.0020 0.0390 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.721 1.260 1.346 1.282 2.679 0.415 0.644 6.009 1.65 1.268

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector Rural * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 23. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1392 0.0139 0.0004 0.0021 0.0333 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.723 1.263 1.350 1.285 2.656 0.416 0.645 6.026 1.64 1.239

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #* Urban local Rural * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 24. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3933 0.1341 0.0240 0.0003 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.721 1.260 1.346 1.282 2.678 0.415 0.644 6.014 1.65 1.371

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------
P:\Planning\ATTAINMT\MOBILE\PM SIP\NOx\DAVGUINOx 

# 6.2.2.3 Guilford County 2009 MOBILE6.2 Output Files for NOx

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: GU091.IN (file 1, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0797 0.0003 0.0016 0.1927 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.734 1.298 1.225 1.280 3.001 0.785 0.982 9.546 2.35 2.849

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1255 0.0409 0.0003 0.0019 0.0990 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.728 1.290 1.216 1.271 2.963 0.738 0.922 8.999 2.27 1.915

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0363 0.0004 0.0019 0.0879 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.691 1.238 1.170 1.221 2.724 0.552 0.688 6.229 1.88 1.525

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0222 0.0004 0.0020 0.0536 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.698 1.247 1.177 1.229 2.767 0.574 0.716 6.496 1.92 1.344

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All VehGVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0236 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.694 1.243 1.174 1.225 2.746 0.563 0.702 6.371 1.90 1.354

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0323 0.0004 0.0020 0.0781 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.689 1.235 1.166 1.217 2.707 0.546 0.681 6.163 1.87 1.458

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0515 0.0003 0.0018 0.1247 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.737 1.302 1.228 1.284 3.019 0.808 1.010 9.812 2.39 2.254

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0350 0.0004 0.0019 0.0849 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.719 1.276 1.204 1.258 2.904 0.672 0.839 8.233 2.15 1.713

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0237 0.0004 0.0020 0.0573 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.676 1.218 1.151 1.201 2.626 0.520 0.648 5.873 1.85 1.304

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0161 0.0004 0.0021 0.0392 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.672 1.213 1.147 1.196 2.590 0.516 0.642 5.815 1.83 1.195

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: YesReformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1391 0.0138 0.0004 0.0021 0.0334 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.672 1.213 1.147 1.196 2.590 0.516 0.642 5.821 1.83 1.164

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q1 * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0238 0.0004 0.0020 0.0574 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.670 1.210 1.144 1.193 2.570 0.513 0.639 5.790 1.82 1.291

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: GU091N.IN (file 2, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg)Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0797 0.0003 0.0016 0.1927 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.853 1.469 1.393 1.450 3.001 0.785 0.982 9.546 2.35 2.955

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1255 0.0409 0.0003 0.0019 0.0990 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.846 1.460 1.384 1.441 2.963 0.738 0.922 8.999 2.27 2.041

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial mix and speeds Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%)Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3652 0.3750 0.1279 0.0363 0.0004 0.0019 0.0879 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.807 1.407 1.338 1.389 2.724 0.552 0.688 6.229 1.88 1.651

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0222 0.0004 0.0020 0.0536 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.813 1.416 1.345 1.398 2.767 0.574 0.716 6.496 1.92 1.478

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F)Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0236 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.810 1.411 1.342 1.394 2.746 0.563 0.702 6.371 1.90 1.488

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0323 0.0004 0.0020 0.0781 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.804 1.403 1.335 1.386 2.707 0.546 0.681 6.163 1.87 1.587

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F)Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0515 0.0003 0.0018 0.1247 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.856 1.473 1.397 1.454 3.019 0.808 1.010 9.812 2.39 2.375

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway mix and speeds Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0350 0.0004 0.0019 0.0849 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.836 1.446 1.372 1.427 2.904 0.672 0.839 8.233 2.15 1.842

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan.Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0237 0.0004 0.0020 0.0573 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.791 1.386 1.320 1.370 2.626 0.520 0.648 5.873 1.85 1.437

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0161 0.0004 0.0021 0.0392 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.787 1.381 1.316 1.364 2.590 0.516 0.642 5.815 1.83 1.332

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1391 0.0138 0.0004 0.0021 0.0334 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.787 1.381 1.316 1.364 2.590 0.516 0.642 5.821 1.83 1.302

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q1 * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 37.1 (F) Maximum Temperature: 53.6 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 45.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 75.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0238 0.0004 0.0020 0.0574 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.784 1.378 1.313 1.362 2.570 0.513 0.639 5.790 1.82 1.424

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: GU092.IN (file 3, run 1). ****************************************************************************

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0795 0.0003 0.0016 0.1929 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.572 0.996 0.913 0.975 2.440 0.746 0.911 8.580 1.81 2.440

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1255 0.0408 0.0003 0.0019 0.0991 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.567 0.989 0.907 0.968 2.409 0.701 0.855 8.085 1.75 1.592-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3653 0.3750 0.1279 0.0362 0.0003 0.0019 0.0880 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.541 0.949 0.871 0.929 2.215 0.525 0.638 5.626 1.44 1.249

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0221 0.0004 0.0020 0.0537 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):Composite NOX : 0.545 0.956 0.877 0.936 2.250 0.546 0.665 5.867 1.48 1.081

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0236 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.543 0.952 0.874 0.932 2.233 0.536 0.652 5.754 1.46 1.092

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0322 0.0004 0.0020 0.0782 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.539 0.946 0.868 0.926 2.201 0.519 0.632 5.566 1.44 1.188

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0514 0.0003 0.0018 0.1248 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.574 0.999 0.916 0.978 2.455 0.768 0.937 8.821 1.84 1.898

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0349 0.0004 0.0019 0.0850 0.0054 1.0000-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.560 0.979 0.898 0.958 2.361 0.639 0.778 7.391 1.65 1.411

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0236 0.0004 0.0020 0.0574 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.530 0.933 0.857 0.914 2.135 0.495 0.602 5.303 1.42 1.049

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0161 0.0004 0.0021 0.0392 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.527 0.929 0.853 0.910 2.106 0.490 0.596 5.251 1.41 0.951

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1391 0.0137 0.0004 0.0021 0.0335 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.527 0.929 0.853 0.910 2.106 0.490 0.596 5.256 1.41 0.922

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q2 * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0237 0.0004 0.0020 0.0575 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.526 0.927 0.851 0.907 2.090 0.488 0.593 5.228 1.40 1.040

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: GU092N.IN (file 4, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0795 0.0003 0.0016 0.1929 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.663 1.145 1.038 1.118 2.440 0.746 0.911 8.580 1.81 2.527

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: NoEvap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1255 0.0408 0.0003 0.0019 0.0991 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.658 1.138 1.032 1.111 2.409 0.701 0.855 8.085 1.75 1.695

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3653 0.3750 0.1279 0.0362 0.0003 0.0019 0.0880 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.630 1.096 0.995 1.070 2.215 0.525 0.638 5.626 1.44 1.353

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector TDM Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppmExhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0221 0.0004 0.0020 0.0537 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.635 1.103 1.001 1.077 2.250 0.546 0.665 5.867 1.48 1.191

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0236 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.633 1.100 0.998 1.074 2.233 0.536 0.652 5.754 1.46 1.201

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local TDM Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psiFuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0322 0.0004 0.0020 0.0782 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.628 1.093 0.993 1.068 2.201 0.519 0.632 5.566 1.44 1.294

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0514 0.0003 0.0018 0.1248 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.665 1.149 1.041 1.121 2.455 0.768 0.937 8.821 1.84 1.997

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg)Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0349 0.0004 0.0019 0.0850 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.651 1.127 1.022 1.100 2.361 0.639 0.778 7.391 1.65 1.516

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0236 0.0004 0.0020 0.0574 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.619 1.080 0.981 1.055 2.135 0.495 0.602 5.303 1.42 1.158

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%)Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0161 0.0004 0.0021 0.0392 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.616 1.076 0.978 1.051 2.106 0.490 0.596 5.251 1.41 1.062

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1391 0.0137 0.0004 0.0021 0.0335 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.616 1.075 0.978 1.051 2.106 0.490 0.596 5.256 1.41 1.034

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q2 * File 4, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 58.5 (F) Maximum Temperature: 77.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 44.3 (%)Maximum Rel. Hum.: 82.0 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 10.1 psi Weathered RVP: 10.1 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0237 0.0004 0.0020 0.0575 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.615 1.073 0.976 1.049 2.090 0.488 0.593 5.228 1.40 1.148

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: GU093.IN (file 5, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0795 0.0003 0.0016 0.1929 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.511 0.874 0.802 0.856 2.533 0.746 0.911 8.580 1.52 2.377

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 2.* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1255 0.0408 0.0003 0.0019 0.0991 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.508 0.868 0.796 0.850 2.500 0.701 0.855 8.085 1.46 1.515

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3653 0.3750 0.1279 0.0362 0.0003 0.0019 0.0880 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.486 0.832 0.765 0.815 2.299 0.525 0.638 5.626 1.21 1.174

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector TDM Q3* File 5, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0221 0.0004 0.0020 0.0537 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.490 0.838 0.770 0.821 2.335 0.546 0.665 5.867 1.24 1.000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0236 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.488 0.835 0.767 0.818 2.317 0.536 0.652 5.754 1.23 1.011

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #* Rural local TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0322 0.0004 0.0020 0.0782 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.485 0.830 0.762 0.813 2.284 0.519 0.632 5.566 1.21 1.112

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0514 0.0003 0.0018 0.1248 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.513 0.877 0.804 0.858 2.548 0.768 0.937 8.821 1.54 1.824

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0349 0.0004 0.0019 0.0850 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.502 0.859 0.788 0.841 2.450 0.639 0.778 7.391 1.39 1.332

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0236 0.0004 0.0020 0.0574 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi):Composite NOX : 0.478 0.818 0.752 0.801 2.216 0.495 0.602 5.303 1.19 0.971

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0161 0.0004 0.0021 0.0392 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.476 0.814 0.749 0.798 2.186 0.490 0.596 5.251 1.18 0.870

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q3 * File 5, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1391 0.0137 0.0004 0.0021 0.0335 0.0059 1.0000-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.476 0.814 0.749 0.798 2.186 0.490 0.596 5.256 1.18 0.840

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q3 Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0237 0.0004 0.0020 0.0575 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.475 0.813 0.748 0.796 2.169 0.488 0.593 5.228 1.17 0.962

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: GU093N.IN (file 6, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All VehGVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0795 0.0003 0.0016 0.1929 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.591 1.005 0.912 0.981 2.533 0.746 0.911 8.580 1.52 2.454

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1255 0.0408 0.0003 0.0019 0.0991 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.587 0.998 0.907 0.975 2.500 0.701 0.855 8.085 1.46 1.605

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3653 0.3750 0.1279 0.0362 0.0003 0.0019 0.0880 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.566 0.961 0.874 0.939 2.299 0.525 0.638 5.626 1.21 1.265

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3855 0.3957 0.1349 0.0221 0.0004 0.0020 0.0537 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.570 0.967 0.879 0.945 2.335 0.546 0.665 5.867 1.24 1.096

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3936 0.1342 0.0236 0.0004 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.568 0.964 0.877 0.942 2.317 0.536 0.652 5.754 1.23 1.107

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3709 0.3810 0.1299 0.0322 0.0004 0.0020 0.0782 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.564 0.959 0.872 0.937 2.284 0.519 0.632 5.566 1.21 1.205

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: YesReformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0514 0.0003 0.0018 0.1248 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.593 1.008 0.915 0.984 2.548 0.768 0.937 8.821 1.54 1.911

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3669 0.3769 0.1286 0.0349 0.0004 0.0019 0.0850 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.582 0.989 0.898 0.966 2.450 0.639 0.778 7.391 1.39 1.424

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: NoATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3833 0.3935 0.1342 0.0236 0.0004 0.0020 0.0574 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.558 0.947 0.862 0.925 2.216 0.495 0.602 5.303 1.19 1.067

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0161 0.0004 0.0021 0.0392 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.556 0.943 0.859 0.922 2.186 0.490 0.596 5.251 1.18 0.968

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: NoEvap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1391 0.0137 0.0004 0.0021 0.0335 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.556 0.943 0.859 0.922 2.186 0.490 0.596 5.256 1.18 0.939

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q3 * File 6, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2009 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 68.2 (F) Maximum Temperature: 83.1 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 56.8 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 86.8 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 7.7 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3933 0.1341 0.0237 0.0004 0.0020 0.0575 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.555 0.941 0.857 0.920 2.169 0.488 0.593 5.228 1.17 1.058

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

*************************************************************************** * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: GU094.IN (file 7, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%)Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0796 0.0003 0.0016 0.1928 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.618 1.132 1.064 1.115 2.606 0.590 0.859 8.393 2.21 2.491

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1255 0.0408 0.0003 0.0019 0.0991 0.0053 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.613 1.124 1.057 1.107 2.573 0.554 0.807 7.903 2.14 1.668

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F)Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3653 0.3750 0.1279 0.0363 0.0003 0.0019 0.0879 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.580 1.079 1.016 1.063 2.366 0.414 0.602 5.491 1.77 1.326

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3856 0.3957 0.1349 0.0221 0.0003 0.0020 0.0537 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.586 1.087 1.023 1.070 2.403 0.431 0.627 5.731 1.81 1.166

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F)Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3936 0.1342 0.0236 0.0003 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.583 1.083 1.020 1.067 2.384 0.423 0.615 5.618 1.79 1.176

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3710 0.3810 0.1299 0.0323 0.0003 0.0020 0.0781 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.578 1.076 1.013 1.060 2.350 0.410 0.595 5.432 1.76 1.267

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: LowMinimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0514 0.0003 0.0018 0.1248 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.621 1.136 1.068 1.118 2.622 0.607 0.884 8.632 2.25 1.967

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3670 0.3769 0.1286 0.0350 0.0003 0.0019 0.0849 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.604 1.113 1.046 1.096 2.521 0.505 0.734 7.215 2.02 1.489

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3935 0.1342 0.0237 0.0003 0.0020 0.0573 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.567 1.061 1.000 1.045 2.280 0.390 0.567 5.172 1.73 1.131

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0161 0.0004 0.0021 0.0392 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.563 1.056 0.996 1.041 2.250 0.387 0.562 5.120 1.72 1.035

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1391 0.0137 0.0004 0.0021 0.0335 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.563 1.056 0.996 1.041 2.249 0.387 0.562 5.125 1.72 1.007

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q4 * File 7, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3933 0.1341 0.0237 0.0003 0.0020 0.0575 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.561 1.053 0.994 1.038 2.232 0.385 0.559 5.097 1.71 1.120

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

**************************************************************************** MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: GU094N.IN (file 8, run 1). * ***************************************************************************

* Reading Registration Distributions from the following external * data file: GUIAGE07.PRN

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural interstate TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3036 0.3115 0.1061 0.0796 0.0003 0.0016 0.1928 0.0045 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.738 1.305 1.229 1.285 2.606 0.590 0.859 8.393 2.21 2.598

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural principle arterial TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3587 0.3684 0.1255 0.0408 0.0003 0.0019 0.0991 0.0053 1.0000-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.732 1.296 1.221 1.277 2.573 0.554 0.807 7.903 2.14 1.794

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor arterial TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 3. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3653 0.3750 0.1279 0.0363 0.0003 0.0019 0.0879 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.697 1.249 1.180 1.231 2.366 0.414 0.602 5.491 1.77 1.453

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 4. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural major collector mix and speeds Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------VMT Distribution: 0.3856 0.3957 0.1349 0.0221 0.0003 0.0020 0.0537 0.0057 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.703 1.257 1.186 1.239 2.403 0.431 0.627 5.731 1.81 1.301

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural minor collector TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 5. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3936 0.1342 0.0236 0.0003 0.0020 0.0572 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.700 1.253 1.183 1.235 2.384 0.423 0.615 5.618 1.79 1.309

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Rural local TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 6. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3710 0.3810 0.1299 0.0323 0.0003 0.0020 0.0781 0.0055 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.694 1.246 1.177 1.228 2.350 0.410 0.595 5.432 1.76 1.396

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban interstate TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 7. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3436 0.3528 0.1202 0.0514 0.0003 0.0018 0.1248 0.0051 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.740 1.309 1.232 1.289 2.622 0.607 0.884 8.632 2.25 2.089

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban freeway TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 8. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All VehGVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3670 0.3769 0.1286 0.0350 0.0003 0.0019 0.0849 0.0054 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.723 1.284 1.210 1.265 2.521 0.505 0.734 7.215 2.02 1.618

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban principle arterial TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 9. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3834 0.3935 0.1342 0.0237 0.0003 0.0020 0.0573 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.683 1.230 1.164 1.213 2.280 0.390 0.567 5.172 1.73 1.263

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban minor arterial TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 10. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: NoVehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3939 0.4046 0.1380 0.0161 0.0004 0.0021 0.0392 0.0058 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.679 1.225 1.160 1.209 2.250 0.387 0.562 5.120 1.72 1.171

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban collector TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 11. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3973 0.4080 0.1391 0.0137 0.0004 0.0021 0.0335 0.0059 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.679 1.225 1.160 1.209 2.249 0.387 0.562 5.125 1.72 1.145

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Urban local TDM Q4 * File 8, Run 1, Scenario 12. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Calendar Year: 2010 Month: Jan. Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 44.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 55.9 (F) Minimum Rel. Hum.: 61.6 (%) Maximum Rel. Hum.: 85.1 (%) Barometric Pressure: 30.00 (inches Hg) Nominal Fuel RVP: 14.0 psi Weathered RVP: 14.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: YesReformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---

--- ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3835 0.3933 0.1341 0.0237 0.0003 0.0020 0.0575 0.0056 1.0000

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite NOX : 0.677 1.223 1.157 1.206 2.232 0.385 0.559 5.097 1.71 1.252

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------

# 6.3 2009 State Vehicle Mix

6.3.1 2009 State Vehicle Mix for PM2.5 using 2006 count data

Rural 2009 State Vehicle Mix

LDV LDT1 LDT2 LDT3 LDT4 HDV2B HDV3 HDV4 HDV5 HDV6 HDV7 HDV8a HDV8b HDBS HDBT MC Interstate 0.3030 0.0718 0.2389 0.0736 0.0339 0.0880 0.0086 0.0072 0.0054 0.0197 0.0233 0.0253 0.0900 0.0045 0.0023 0.0045 Princ. Art. 0.3591 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0458 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053 Minor Art. 0.3668 0.0869 0.2894 0.0892 0.0410 0.0389 0.0038 0.0032 0.0024 0.0087 0.0103 0.0112 0.0398 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054 Major Collector 0.3827 0.0906 0.3018 0.0930 0.0428 0.0267 0.0026 0.0022 0.0017 0.0060 0.0071 0.0077 0.0274 0.0014 0.0007 0.0056 Minor Collector 0.3821 0.0905 0.3014 0.0929 0.0427 0.0272 0.0027 0.0022 0.0017 0.0061 0.0072 0.0078 0.0278 0.0014 0.0007 0.0056 Local 0.3805 0.0901 0.3001 0.0925 0.0425 0.0284 0.0028 0.0023 0.0018 0.0064 0.0075 0.0082 0.0291 0.0015 0.0007 0.0056

Urban LDV LDT1 LDT2 LDT3 LDT4 HDV2B HDV3 HDV4 HDV5 HDV6 HDV7 HDV8a HDV8b HDBS HDBT MC Interstate 0.3442 0.0815 0.2714 0.0836 0.0384 0.0564 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0149 0.0162 0.0577 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051 Freeway 0.3699 0.0876 0.2918 0.0899 0.0413 0.0366 0.0036 0.0030 0.0023 0.0082 0.0097 0.0105 0.0374 0.0019 0.0009 0.0054 Princ. Art. 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056 Minor Art 0.3930 0.0931 0.3100 0.0956 0.0439 0.0188 0.0018 0.0015 0.0012 0.0042 0.0050 0.0054 0.0192 0.0010 0.0005 0.0058 Coll 0.3967 0.0939 0.3127 0.0964 0.0443 0.0161 0.0016 0.0013 0.0010 0.0036 0.0043 0.0046 0.0165 0.0008 0.0004 0.0058 Local 0.3872 0.0917 0.3054 0.0941 0.0433 0.0233 0.0023 0.0019 0.0014 0.0052 0.0062 0.0067 0.0238 0.0012 0.0006 0.0057



# 6.3.2 2009 State Vehicle Mix fo r NOx using 2007 count data

Rural 2009 State Vehicle Mix LDV LDT1 LDT2 LDT3 LDT4 HDV2B HDV3 HDV4 HDV5 HDV6 HDV7 HDV8a HDV8b HDBS HDBT MC Interstate 0.3039 0.0719 0.2396 0.0738 0.0339 0.0874 0.0085 0.0072 0.0054 0.0195 0.0231 0.0252 0.0894 0.0045 0.0022 0.0045 Princ. Art. 0.3590 0.0851 0.2833 0.0873 0.0401 0.0448 0.0044 0.0037 0.0028 0.0100 0.0119 0.0129 0.0459 0.0023 0.0012 0.0053 Minor Art. 0.3656 0.0866 0.2884 0.0889 0.0409 0.0398 0.0039 0.0033 0.0025 0.0089 0.0105 0.0115 0.0408 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054Major Collector 0.3859 0.0914 0.3043 0.0938 0.0431 0.0243 0.0024 0.0020 0.0015 0.0054 0.0064 0.0070 0.0249 0.0013 0.0006 0.0057 Minor Collector 0.3838 0.0909 0.3027 0.0933 0.0429 0.0259 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0265 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056 Local 0.3713 0.0880 0.2930 0.0903 0.0415 0.0354 0.0035 0.0029 0.0022 0.0079 0.0094 0.0102 0.0362 0.0018 0.0009 0.0055

Urban LDV LDT1 LDT2 LDT3 LDT4 HDV2B HDV3 HDV4 HDV5 HDV6 HDV7 HDV8a HDV8b HDBS HDBT MC Interstate 0.3439 0.0815 0.2713 0.0836 0.0384 0.0565 0.0055 0.0046 0.0035 0.0126 0.0150 0.0163 0.0578 0.0029 0.0015 0.0051 Freeway 0.3673 0.0870 0.2899 0.0894 0.0411 0.0384 0.0037 0.0032 0.0024 0.0086 0.0102 0.0111 0.0393 0.0020 0.0010 0.0054 Princ. Art. 0.3837 0.0909 0.3026 0.0933 0.0429 0.0260 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0266 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056 Minor Art 0.3943 0.0934 0.3112 0.0959 0.0441 0.0177 0.0017 0.0015 0.0011 0.0040 0.0047 0.0051 0.0181 0.0009 0.0005 0.0058 Coll 0.3977 0.0942 0.3138 0.0967 0.0445 0.0151 0.0015 0.0012 0.0009 0.0034 0.0040 0.0044 0.0155 0.0008 0.0004 0.0059 Local 0.3838 0.0908 0.3025 0.0932 0.0429 0.0261 0.0025 0.0021 0.0016 0.0058 0.0069 0.0075 0.0267 0.0013 0.0007 0.0056 

# 6.4 2005 Vehicle Age Distribution Files used for PM2.5

6.4.1 2005 Triad Vehicle Age Distributio n File Used for Guilford County

*Convert MOBILE5 Registration Fractions to MOBILE6-Based Registration Fractions * *Calendar Year: 2005.000User-Input * *MOBILE5b Reg Fractions * 0.071 0.067 0.067 0.069 0.069 0.076 0.073 0.066 0.062 0.055 * 0.059 0.046 0.040 0.032 0.026 0.023 0.020 0.016 0.012 0.009 * 0.007 0.005 0.003 0.001 0.024 * 0.041 0.052 0.054 0.052 0.055 0.061 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.048 * 0.053 0.055 0.037 0.032 0.027 0.024 0.031 0.030 0.024 0.024 * 0.017 0.014 0.008 0.006 0.081 * 0.091 0.081 0.078 0.052 0.062 0.070 0.079 0.062 0.060 0.044 * 0.052 0.042 0.029 0.019 0.017 0.018 0.019 0.020 0.013 0.013 * 0.011 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.053 * 0.083 0.079 0.068 0.048 0.069 0.086 0.068 0.045 0.053 0.036 * 0.043 0.029 0.020 0.016 0.012 0.018 0.023 0.021 0.017 0.020 * 0.014 0.009 0.007 0.007 0.109 * 0.075 0.047 0.056 0.061 0.062 0.060 0.054 0.034 0.030 0.024 * 0.034 0.016 0.023 0.019 0.026 0.016 0.014 0.009 0.041 0.033 * 0.059 0.046 0.052 0.036 0.072 * 0.063 0.080 0.082 0.060 0.083 0.071 0.088 0.025 0.064 0.049 * 0.053 0.032 0.030 0.023 0.015 0.021 0.020 0.013 0.019 0.018 * 0.017 0.020 0.013 0.019 0.023 * 0.114 0.090 0.059 0.056 0.082 0.102 0.100 0.047 0.055 0.045 * 0.049 0.033 0.023 0.018 0.018 0.021 0.022 0.016 0.015 0.011 * 0.008 0.006 0.002 0.002 0.008 * 0.098 0.088 0.105 0.092 0.081 0.073 0.058 0.043 0.038 0.039 * 0.030 0.026 0.023 0.015 0.012 0.010 0.010 0.008 0.012 0.017 * 0.017 0.012 0.011 0.016 0.069 * * * MOBILE6 Vehicle Classes: * 1 LDV Light-Duty Vehicles (Passenger Cars)* 2 LDT1 Light-Duty Trucks 1 (0-6,000 lbs. GVWR, 0-3750 lbs. LVW) * 3 LDT2 Light Duty Trucks 2 (0-6,000 lbs. GVWR, 3751-5750 lbs. LVW) * 4 LDT3 Light Duty Trucks 3 (6,001-8500 lbs. GVWR, 0-3750 lbs. LVW) * 5 LDT4 Light Duty Trucks 4 (6,001-8500 lbs. GVWR, 3751-5750 lbs. LVW) * 6 HDV2B Class 2b Heavy Duty Vehicles (8501-10,000 lbs. GVWR) * 7 HDV3 Class 3 Heavy Duty Vehicles (10,001-14,000 lbs. GVWR) * 8 HDV4 Class 4 Heavy Duty Vehicles (14,001-16,000 lbs. GVWR) * 9 HDV5 Class 5 Heavy Duty Vehicles (16,001-19,500 lbs. GVWR) * 10 HDV6 Class 6 Heavy Duty Vehicles (19,501-26,000 lbs. GVWR) * 11 HDV7 Class 7 Heavy Duty Vehicles (26,001-33,000 lbs. GVWR) * 12 HDV8A Class 8a Heavy Duty Vehicles (33,001-60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 13 HDV8B Class 8b Heavy Duty Vehicles (>60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 14 HDBS School Busses * 15 HDBT Transit and Urban Busses * 16 MC Motorcycles (All) * REG DIST * RESULTING MOBILE6-BASED REGISTRATION FRACTIONS * *MOBILE6 REGISTRATION FRACTIONS BY VEHICLE CLASS AND AGE * LDV M5 LDGV 1 0.071 0.067 0.067 0.069 0.069 0.076 0.073 0.066 0.062 0.055 0.059 0.046 0.040 0.032 0.026 0.023 0.020 0.016 0.012 0.009 0.007 0.005 0.003 0.001 0.024 * LDT1 M5 LDGT1 2 0.041 0.052 0.054 0.052 0.055 0.061 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.048 0.053 0.055 0.037 0.032 0.027 0.024 0.031 0.030 0.024 0.024 0.017 0.014 0.008 0.006 0.081 * LDT2 M5 LDGT1 3 0.041 0.052 0.054 0.052 0.055 0.061 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.048 0.053 0.055 0.037 0.032 0.027 0.024 0.031 0.030 0.024 0.024 0.017 0.014 0.008 0.006 0.081 * LDT3 M5 LDGT2 4 0.091 0.081 0.078 0.052 0.062 0.070 0.079 0.062 0.060 0.044 0.052 0.042 0.029 0.019 0.017 0.018 0.019 0.020 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.053 * LDT4 M5 LDGT2 5 0.091 0.081 0.078 0.052 0.062 0.070 0.079 0.062 0.060 0.044 0.052 0.042 0.029 0.019 0.017 0.018 0.019 0.020 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.053 * HDV2B M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 6 0.098 0.084 0.063 0.052 0.076 0.094 0.084 0.046 0.054 0.040 0.046 0.031 0.022 0.017 0.015 0.019 0.022 0.018 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.008 0.005 0.005 0.059 * HDV3 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 7 0.098 0.084 0.063 0.052 0.076 0.094 0.084 0.046 0.054 0.040 0.046 0.031 0.022 0.017 0.015 0.019 0.022 0.018 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.008 0.005 0.005 0.059 * HDV4 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 8 0.098 0.084 0.063 0.052 0.076 0.094 0.084 0.046 0.054 0.040 0.046 0.031 0.022 0.017 0.015 0.019 0.022 0.018 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.008 0.005 0.005 0.059 * HDV5 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 9 0.098 0.084 0.063 0.052 0.076 0.094 0.084 0.046 0.054 0.040 0.046 0.031 0.022 0.017 0.015 0.019 0.022 0.018 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.008 0.005 0.005 0.059 * HDV6 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 10 0.098 0.084 0.063 0.052 0.076 0.094 0.084 0.046 0.054 0.040 0.046 0.031 0.022 0.017 0.015 0.019 0.022 0.018 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.008 0.005 0.005 0.059 * HDV7 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 11 0.098 0.084 0.063 0.052 0.076 0.094 0.084 0.046 0.054 0.040 0.046 0.031 0.022 0.017 0.015 0.019 0.022 0.018 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.008 0.005 0.005 0.059 * HDV8a M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 12 0.098 0.084 0.063 0.052 0.076 0.094 0.084 0.046 0.054 0.040 0.046 0.031 0.022 0.017 0.015 0.019 0.022 0.018 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.008 0.005 0.005 0.059 * HDV8b M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 13 0.098 0.084 0.063 0.052 0.076 0.094 0.084 0.046 0.054 0.040 0.046 0.031 0.022 0.017 0.015 0.019 0.022 0.018 0.016 0.0150.011 0.008 0.005 0.005 0.059 * HDBS M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 14 0.098 0.084 0.063 0.052 0.076 0.094 0.084 0.046 0.054 0.040 0.046 0.031 0.022 0.017 0.015 0.019 0.022 0.018 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.008 0.005 0.005 0.059 * HDBT M5 HDDVs 15 0.114 0.090 0.059 0.056 0.082 0.102 0.100 0.047 0.055 0.045 0.049 0.033 0.023 0.018 0.018 0.021 0.022 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.008 0.006 0.002 0.002 0.008 * Motorcycles M5 MC 16 0.098 0.088 0.105 0.092 0.081 0.073 0.058 0.043 0.038 0.039 0.030 0.026 0.023 0.015 0.012 0.010 0.010 0.008 0.012 0.017 0.017 0.012 0.011 0.016 0.069

# 6.4.2 2005 NC Vehicle Age Distribution File Used for Catawba and Davidson Counties used for PM2.5

*Convert MOBILE5 Registration Fractions to MOBILE6-Based Registration Fractions * *Calendar Year: 2005.000User-Input * *MOBILE5b Reg Fractions * 0.061 0.064 0.063 0.065 0.064 0.072 0.069 0.063 0.061 0.056 * 0.061 0.049 0.043 0.035 0.029 0.025 0.023 0.019 0.015 0.011 * 0.009 0.006 0.004 0.002 0.030 * 0.040 0.050 0.047 0.047 0.052 0.058 0.056 0.055 0.057 0.047 * 0.051 0.054 0.039 0.032 0.029 0.028 0.034 0.033 0.028 0.028 * 0.021 0.018 0.012 0.007 0.078 * 0.071 0.079 0.060 0.049 0.053 0.061 0.059 0.047 0.053 0.041 * 0.050 0.040 0.030 0.023 0.021 0.025 0.031 0.028 0.019 0.021 * 0.018 0.014 0.009 0.006 0.090 * 0.046 0.048 0.045 0.039 0.048 0.053 0.050 0.033 0.041 0.036 * 0.047 0.034 0.025 0.022 0.020 0.024 0.031 0.029 0.023 0.027 * 0.023 0.018 0.013 0.011 0.215 * 0.092 0.065 0.068 0.071 0.063 0.065 0.047 0.034 0.027 0.031 * 0.029 0.021 0.018 0.015 0.024 0.016 0.015 0.012 0.030 0.053 * 0.047 0.039 0.034 0.027 0.056 * 0.084 0.087 0.090 0.077 0.084 0.069 0.087 0.022 0.070 0.042 * 0.037 0.029 0.024 0.018 0.016 0.018 0.018 0.013 0.013 0.019 * 0.016 0.019 0.012 0.020 0.016 * 0.093 0.074 0.064 0.051 0.071 0.087 0.089 0.051 0.063 0.044 * 0.051 0.037 0.027 0.019 0.020 0.027 0.026 0.025 0.021 0.014 * 0.013 0.009 0.004 0.004 0.016 * 0.122 0.092 0.104 0.087 0.076 0.066 0.056 0.042 0.038 0.037 * 0.028 0.024 0.019 0.013 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.011 0.018 * 0.016 0.013 0.013 0.015 0.070 * * * MOBILE6 Vehicle Classes: * 1 LDV Light-Duty Vehicles (Passenger Cars) * 2 LDT1 Light-Duty Trucks 1 (0-6,000 lbs. GVWR, 0-3750 lbs. LVW) * 3 LDT2 Light Duty Trucks 2 (0-6,000 lbs. GVWR, 3751-5750 lbs. LVW) * 4 LDT3 Light Duty Trucks 3 (6,001-8500 lbs. GVWR, 0-3750 lbs. LVW) * 5 LDT4 Light Duty Trucks 4 (6,001-8500 lbs. GVWR, 3751-5750 lbs. LVW) * 6 HDV2B Class 2b Heavy Duty Vehicles (8501-10,000 lbs. GVWR) * 7 HDV3 Class 3 Heavy Duty Vehicles (10,001-14,000 lbs. GVWR) * 8 HDV4 Class 4 Heavy Duty Vehicles (14,001-16,000 lbs. GVWR) * 9 HDV5 Class 5 Heavy Duty Vehicles (16,001-19,500 lbs. GVWR) * 10 HDV6 Class 6 Heavy Duty Vehicles (19,501-26,000 lbs. GVWR) * 11 HDV7 Class 7 Heavy Duty Vehicles (26,001-33,000 lbs. GVWR) * 12 HDV8A Class 8a Heavy Duty Vehicles (33,001-60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 13 HDV8B Class 8b Heavy Duty Vehicles (>60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 14 HDBS School Busses * 15 HDBT Transit and Urban Busses * 16 MC Motorcycles (All) * REG DIST * RESULTING MOBILE6-BASED REGISTRATION FRACTIONS * *MOBILE6 REGISTRATION FRACTIONS BY VEHICLE CLASS AND AGE * LDV M5 LDGV 1 0.061 0.064 0.063 0.065 0.064 0.072 0.069 0.063 0.061 0.056 0.061 0.049 0.043 0.035 0.029 0.025 0.023 0.019 0.015 0.011 0.009 0.006 0.004 0.002 0.030 * LDT1 M5 LDGT1 2 0.040 0.050 0.047 0.047 0.052 0.058 0.056 0.055 0.057 0.047 0.051 0.054 0.039 0.032 0.029 0.028 0.034 0.033 0.028 0.028 0.021 0.018 0.012 0.007 0.078 * LDT2 M5 LDGT1 3 0.040 0.050 0.047 0.047 0.052 0.058 0.056 0.055 0.057 0.047 0.051 0.054 0.039 0.032 0.029 0.028 0.034 0.033 0.028 0.028 0.021 0.018 0.012 0.007 0.078 * LDT3 M5 LDGT2 4 0.071 0.079 0.060 0.049 0.053 0.061 0.059 0.047 0.053 0.0410.050 0.040 0.030 0.023 0.021 0.025 0.031 0.028 0.019 0.021 0.018 0.014 0.009 0.006 0.090 * LDT4 M5 LDGT2 5 0.071 0.079 0.060 0.049 0.053 0.061 0.059 0.047 0.053 0.041 0.050 0.040 0.030 0.023 0.021 0.025 0.031 0.028 0.019 0.021 0.018 0.014 0.009 0.006 0.090 * HDV2B M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 6 0.069 0.061 0.054 0.045 0.060 0.069 0.069 0.042 0.052 0.040 0.049 0.036 0.026 0.021 0.020 0.026 0.028 0.027 0.022 0.021 0.018 0.014 0.008 0.007 0.116 * HDV3 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 7 0.069 0.061 0.054 0.045 0.060 0.069 0.069 0.042 0.052 0.040 0.049 0.036 0.026 0.021 0.020 0.026 0.028 0.027 0.022 0.021 0.018 0.014 0.008 0.007 0.116 * HDV4 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 8 0.069 0.061 0.054 0.045 0.060 0.069 0.069 0.042 0.052 0.040 0.049 0.036 0.026 0.021 0.020 0.026 0.028 0.027 0.022 0.021 0.018 0.014 0.008 0.007 0.116 * HDV5 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 9 0.069 0.061 0.054 0.045 0.060 0.069 0.069 0.042 0.052 0.040 0.049 0.036 0.026 0.021 0.020 0.026 0.028 0.027 0.022 0.021 0.018 0.014 0.008 0.007 0.116 * HDV6 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 10 0.069 0.061 0.054 0.045 0.060 0.069 0.069 0.042 0.052 0.040 0.049 0.036 0.026 0.021 0.020 0.026 0.028 0.027 0.022 0.021 0.018 0.014 0.008 0.007 0.116 * HDV7 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 11 0.069 0.061 0.054 0.045 0.060 0.069 0.069 0.042 0.052 0.040 0.049 0.036 0.026 0.021 0.020 0.026 0.028 0.027 0.022 0.021 0.018 0.014 0.008 0.007 0.116 * HDV8a M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 12 0.069 0.061 0.054 0.045 0.060 0.069 0.069 0.042 0.052 0.040 0.049 0.036 0.026 0.021 0.020 0.026 0.028 0.027 0.022 0.021 0.018 0.014 0.008 0.007 0.116 * HDV8b M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 13 0.069 0.061 0.054 0.045 0.060 0.069 0.069 0.042 0.052 0.040 0.049 0.036 0.026 0.021 0.020 0.026 0.028 0.027 0.022 0.021 0.018 0.014 0.008 0.007 0.116 * HDBS M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 14 0.069 0.061 0.054 0.045 0.060 0.069 0.069 0.042 0.052 0.040 0.049 0.036 0.026 0.021 0.020 0.026 0.028 0.027 0.022 0.021 0.018 0.014 0.008 0.007 0.116 * HDBT M5 HDDVs 15 0.093 0.074 0.064 0.051 0.071 0.087 0.089 0.051 0.063 0.044 0.051 0.037 0.027 0.019 0.020 0.027 0.026 0.025 0.021 0.014 0.013 0.009 0.004 0.004 0.016 * Motorcycles M5 MC 16 0.122 0.092 0.104 0.087 0.076 0.066 0.056 0.042 0.038 0.037 0.028 0.024 0.019 0.013 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.011 0.018 0.016 0.013 0.013 0.015 0.070



# 6.5 2007 Vehicle Age Distribution Files used for NOx

6.5.1 2007 Triad Vehicle Age Distribution File Used for Guilford County NOx

*Convert MOBILE5 Registration Fractions to MOBILE6-Based Registration Fractions * *Calendar Year: 2007.000User-Input * *MOBILE5b Reg Fractions * 0.068 0.059 0.066 0.067 0.068 0.068 0.065 0.072 0.067 0.059 * 0.052 0.046 0.047 0.036 0.031 0.024 0.019 0.017 0.014 0.011 * 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.022 * 0.040 0.039 0.040 0.052 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.058 0.056 0.057 * 0.054 0.044 0.047 0.050 0.033 0.028 0.024 0.021 0.026 0.025 * 0.021 0.021 0.015 0.012 0.082 * 0.094 0.095 0.087 0.082 0.066 0.055 0.049 0.062 0.072 0.050* 0.045 0.032 0.036 0.028 0.018 0.012 0.013 0.012 0.013 0.010 * 0.007 0.010 0.007 0.006 0.035 * 0.083 0.104 0.092 0.074 0.059 0.043 0.057 0.072 0.052 0.039 * 0.044 0.027 0.030 0.020 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.012 0.016 0.014 * 0.014 0.016 0.010 0.005 0.081 * 0.033 0.090 0.067 0.039 0.044 0.058 0.072 0.058 0.041 0.032 * 0.028 0.022 0.033 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.024 0.016 0.009 0.010 * 0.036 0.030 0.048 0.036 0.127 * 0.030 0.064 0.056 0.075 0.097 0.062 0.086 0.067 0.077 0.024 * 0.058 0.046 0.044 0.029 0.028 0.017 0.012 0.019 0.014 0.011 * 0.010 0.017 0.008 0.012 0.039 * 0.125 0.104 0.098 0.085 0.053 0.043 0.062 0.077 0.074 0.031 * 0.041 0.027 0.036 0.025 0.016 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.017 0.013 * 0.011 0.007 0.004 0.003 0.007 * 0.090 0.099 0.086 0.072 0.088 0.075 0.069 0.059 0.048 0.034 * 0.030 0.028 0.021 0.023 0.019 0.012 0.007 0.009 0.007 0.007 * 0.009 0.015 0.011 0.009 0.075 * * * MOBILE6 Vehicle Classes: * 1 LDV Light-Duty Vehicles (Passenger Cars) * 2 LDT1 Light-Duty Trucks 1 (0-6,000 lbs. GVWR, 0-3750 lbs. LVW) * 3 LDT2 Light Duty Trucks 2 (0-6,000 lbs. GVWR, 3751-5750 lbs. LVW) * 4 LDT3 Light Duty Trucks 3 (6,001-8500 lbs. GVWR, 0-3750 lbs. LVW) * 5 LDT4 Light Duty Trucks 4 (6,001-8500 lbs. GVWR, 3751-5750 lbs. LVW) * 6 HDV2B Class 2b Heavy Duty Vehicles (8501-10,000 lbs. GVWR) * 7 HDV3 Class 3 Heavy Duty Vehicles (10,001-14,000 lbs. GVWR) * 8 HDV4 Class 4 Heavy Duty Vehicles (14,001-16,000 lbs. GVWR) * 9 HDV5 Class 5 Heavy Duty Vehicles (16,001-19,500 lbs. GVWR) * 10 HDV6 Class 6 Heavy Duty Vehicles (19,501-26,000 lbs. GVWR) * 11 HDV7 Class 7 Heavy Duty Vehicles (26,001-33,000 lbs. GVWR) * 12 HDV8A Class 8a Heavy Duty Vehicles (33,001-60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 13 HDV8B Class 8b Heavy Duty Vehicles (>60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 14 HDBS School Busses * 15 HDBT Transit and Urban Busses * 16 MC Motorcycles (All) * REG DIST * RESULTING MOBILE6-BASED REGISTRATION FRACTIONS * *MOBILE6 REGISTRATION FRACTIONS BY VEHICLE CLASS AND AGE * LDV M5 LDGV 1 0.068 0.059 0.066 0.067 0.068 0.068 0.065 0.072 0.067 0.059 0.052 0.046 0.047 0.036 0.031 0.024 0.019 0.017 0.014 0.011 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.022 * LDT1 M5 LDGT1 2 0.040 0.039 0.040 0.052 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.058 0.056 0.057 0.054 0.044 0.047 0.050 0.033 0.028 0.024 0.021 0.026 0.025 0.021 0.021 0.015 0.012 0.082 * LDT2 M5 LDGT1 3 0.040 0.039 0.040 0.052 0.051 0.052 0.053 0.058 0.056 0.057 0.054 0.044 0.047 0.050 0.033 0.028 0.024 0.021 0.026 0.025 0.021 0.021 0.015 0.012 0.082 * LDT3 M5 LDGT2 4 0.094 0.095 0.087 0.082 0.066 0.055 0.049 0.062 0.072 0.050 0.045 0.032 0.036 0.028 0.018 0.012 0.013 0.012 0.013 0.010 0.007 0.010 0.007 0.006 0.035 * LDT4 M5 LDGT2 5 0.094 0.095 0.087 0.082 0.066 0.055 0.049 0.062 0.072 0.050 0.045 0.032 0.036 0.028 0.018 0.012 0.013 0.012 0.013 0.010 0.007 0.010 0.007 0.006 0.035 * HDV2B M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 6 0.104 0.104 0.095 0.080 0.056 0.043 0.059 0.075 0.063 0.035 0.042 0.027 0.033 0.023 0.015 0.012 0.011 0.013 0.017 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.007 0.004 0.044 * HDV3 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 7 0.104 0.104 0.095 0.080 0.056 0.043 0.059 0.075 0.063 0.035 0.042 0.027 0.033 0.023 0.015 0.012 0.011 0.013 0.017 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.007 0.004 0.044 * HDV4 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 8 0.104 0.104 0.095 0.080 0.056 0.043 0.059 0.075 0.063 0.0350.042 0.027 0.033 0.023 0.015 0.012 0.011 0.013 0.017 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.007 0.004 0.044 * HDV5 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 9 0.104 0.104 0.095 0.080 0.056 0.043 0.059 0.075 0.063 0.035 0.042 0.027 0.033 0.023 0.015 0.012 0.011 0.013 0.017 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.007 0.004 0.044 * HDV6 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 10 0.104 0.104 0.095 0.080 0.056 0.043 0.059 0.075 0.063 0.035 0.042 0.027 0.033 0.023 0.015 0.012 0.011 0.013 0.017 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.007 0.004 0.044 * HDV7 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 11 0.104 0.104 0.095 0.080 0.056 0.043 0.059 0.075 0.063 0.035 0.042 0.027 0.033 0.023 0.015 0.012 0.011 0.013 0.017 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.007 0.004 0.044 * HDV8a M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 12 0.104 0.104 0.095 0.080 0.056 0.043 0.059 0.075 0.063 0.035 0.042 0.027 0.033 0.023 0.015 0.012 0.011 0.013 0.017 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.007 0.004 0.044 * HDV8b M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 13 0.104 0.104 0.095 0.080 0.056 0.043 0.059 0.075 0.063 0.035 0.042 0.027 0.033 0.023 0.015 0.012 0.011 0.013 0.017 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.007 0.004 0.044 * HDBS M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 14 0.104 0.104 0.095 0.080 0.056 0.043 0.059 0.075 0.063 0.035 0.042 0.027 0.033 0.023 0.015 0.012 0.011 0.013 0.017 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.007 0.004 0.044 * HDBT M5 HDDVs 15 0.125 0.104 0.098 0.085 0.053 0.043 0.062 0.077 0.074 0.031 0.041 0.027 0.036 0.025 0.016 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.017 0.013 0.011 0.007 0.004 0.003 0.007 * Motorcycles M5 MC 16 0.090 0.099 0.086 0.072 0.088 0.075 0.069 0.059 0.048 0.034 0.030 0.028 0.021 0.023 0.019 0.012 0.007 0.009 0.007 0.007 0.009 0.015 0.011 0.009 0.075



# 6.5.2 2007 Triad Vehicle Age Distribution File Used for Catawba and Davidson Counties NOx

*Convert MOBILE5 Registration Fractions to MOBILE6-Based Registration Fractions * *Calendar Year: 2007.000User-Input * *MOBILE5b Reg Fractions * 0.057 0.060 0.066 0.065 0.064 0.064 0.062 0.069 0.064 0.057 * 0.053 0.046 0.050 0.039 0.033 0.026 0.021 0.018 0.016 0.012 * 0.010 0.007 0.006 0.004 0.030 * 0.036 0.039 0.041 0.051 0.047 0.048 0.051 0.057 0.055 0.053 * 0.054 0.043 0.047 0.050 0.036 0.028 0.025 0.025 0.030 0.028 * 0.024 0.023 0.017 0.015 0.078 * 0.074 0.075 0.069 0.071 0.056 0.045 0.050 0.057 0.054 0.042 * 0.047 0.035 0.043 0.033 0.024 0.018 0.016 0.019 0.024 0.020 * 0.014 0.016 0.012 0.010 0.074 * 0.045 0.056 0.049 0.051 0.047 0.039 0.049 0.052 0.047 0.033 * 0.040 0.032 0.041 0.030 0.022 0.019 0.017 0.021 0.026 0.025 * 0.019 0.022 0.018 0.015 0.184 * 0.039 0.103 0.081 0.057 0.061 0.064 0.057 0.059 0.043 0.031 * 0.023 0.028 0.025 0.017 0.017 0.014 0.019 0.015 0.012 0.011 * 0.025 0.039 0.039 0.031 0.091 * 0.049 0.085 0.069 0.078 0.079 0.067 0.076 0.061 0.078 0.020 * 0.061 0.040 0.033 0.027 0.021 0.014 0.013 0.016 0.014 0.010 * 0.010 0.015 0.013 0.014 0.036 * 0.083 0.087 0.077 0.066 0.057 0.047 0.065 0.075 0.076 0.042 * 0.052 0.036 0.039 0.028 0.021 0.014 0.016 0.022 0.020 0.019 * 0.015 0.010 0.009 0.007 0.016 * 0.102 0.107 0.094 0.073 0.084 0.070 0.061 0.053 0.045 0.034 * 0.030 0.029 0.022 0.019 0.016 0.010 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 * 0.009 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.076* * * MOBILE6 Vehicle Classes: * 1 LDV Light-Duty Vehicles (Passenger Cars) * 2 LDT1 Light-Duty Trucks 1 (0-6,000 lbs. GVWR, 0-3750 lbs. LVW) * 3 LDT2 Light Duty Trucks 2 (0-6,000 lbs. GVWR, 3751-5750 lbs. LVW) * 4 LDT3 Light Duty Trucks 3 (6,001-8500 lbs. GVWR, 0-3750 lbs. LVW) * 5 LDT4 Light Duty Trucks 4 (6,001-8500 lbs. GVWR, 3751-5750 lbs. LVW) * 6 HDV2B Class 2b Heavy Duty Vehicles (8501-10,000 lbs. GVWR) * 7 HDV3 Class 3 Heavy Duty Vehicles (10,001-14,000 lbs. GVWR) * 8 HDV4 Class 4 Heavy Duty Vehicles (14,001-16,000 lbs. GVWR) * 9 HDV5 Class 5 Heavy Duty Vehicles (16,001-19,500 lbs. GVWR) * 10 HDV6 Class 6 Heavy Duty Vehicles (19,501-26,000 lbs. GVWR) * 11 HDV7 Class 7 Heavy Duty Vehicles (26,001-33,000 lbs. GVWR) * 12 HDV8A Class 8a Heavy Duty Vehicles (33,001-60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 13 HDV8B Class 8b Heavy Duty Vehicles (>60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 14 HDBS School Busses * 15 HDBT Transit and Urban Busses * 16 MC Motorcycles (All) * REG DIST * RESULTING MOBILE6-BASED REGISTRATION FRACTIONS * *MOBILE6 REGISTRATION FRACTIONS BY VEHICLE CLASS AND AGE * LDV M5 LDGV 1 0.057 0.060 0.066 0.065 0.064 0.064 0.062 0.069 0.064 0.057 0.053 0.046 0.050 0.039 0.033 0.026 0.021 0.018 0.016 0.012 0.010 0.007 0.006 0.004 0.030 * LDT1 M5 LDGT1 2 0.036 0.039 0.041 0.051 0.047 0.048 0.051 0.057 0.055 0.053 0.054 0.043 0.047 0.050 0.036 0.028 0.025 0.025 0.030 0.028 0.024 0.023 0.017 0.015 0.078 * LDT2 M5 LDGT1 3 0.036 0.039 0.041 0.051 0.047 0.048 0.051 0.057 0.055 0.053 0.054 0.043 0.047 0.050 0.036 0.028 0.025 0.025 0.030 0.028 0.024 0.023 0.017 0.015 0.078 * LDT3 M5 LDGT2 4 0.074 0.075 0.069 0.071 0.056 0.045 0.050 0.057 0.054 0.042 0.047 0.035 0.043 0.033 0.024 0.018 0.016 0.019 0.024 0.020 0.014 0.016 0.012 0.010 0.074 * LDT4 M5 LDGT2 5 0.074 0.075 0.069 0.071 0.056 0.045 0.050 0.057 0.054 0.042 0.047 0.035 0.043 0.033 0.024 0.018 0.016 0.019 0.024 0.020 0.014 0.016 0.012 0.010 0.074 * HDV2B M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 6 0.064 0.072 0.063 0.059 0.052 0.043 0.057 0.064 0.062 0.037 0.046 0.034 0.040 0.029 0.021 0.017 0.016 0.021 0.023 0.022 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.011 0.099 * HDV3 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 7 0.064 0.072 0.063 0.059 0.052 0.043 0.057 0.064 0.062 0.037 0.046 0.034 0.040 0.029 0.021 0.017 0.016 0.021 0.023 0.022 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.011 0.099 * HDV4 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 8 0.064 0.072 0.063 0.059 0.052 0.043 0.057 0.064 0.062 0.037 0.046 0.034 0.040 0.029 0.021 0.017 0.016 0.021 0.023 0.022 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.011 0.099 * HDV5 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 9 0.064 0.072 0.063 0.059 0.052 0.043 0.057 0.064 0.062 0.037 0.046 0.034 0.040 0.029 0.021 0.017 0.016 0.021 0.023 0.022 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.011 0.099 * HDV6 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 10 0.064 0.072 0.063 0.059 0.052 0.043 0.057 0.064 0.062 0.037 0.046 0.034 0.040 0.029 0.021 0.017 0.016 0.021 0.023 0.022 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.011 0.099 * HDV7 M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 11 0.064 0.072 0.063 0.059 0.052 0.043 0.057 0.064 0.062 0.037 0.046 0.034 0.040 0.029 0.021 0.017 0.016 0.021 0.023 0.022 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.011 0.099 * HDV8a M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 12 0.064 0.072 0.063 0.059 0.052 0.043 0.057 0.064 0.062 0.037 0.046 0.034 0.040 0.029 0.021 0.017 0.016 0.021 0.023 0.0220.017 0.016 0.014 0.011 0.099 * HDV8b M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 13 0.064 0.072 0.063 0.059 0.052 0.043 0.057 0.064 0.062 0.037 0.046 0.034 0.040 0.029 0.021 0.017 0.016 0.021 0.023 0.022 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.011 0.099 * HDBS M5 HDVs (Combined HDGV and HDDV) 14 0.064 0.072 0.063 0.059 0.052 0.043 0.057 0.064 0.062 0.037 0.046 0.034 0.040 0.029 0.021 0.017 0.016 0.021 0.023 0.022 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.011 0.099 * HDBT M5 HDDVs 15 0.083 0.087 0.077 0.066 0.057 0.047 0.065 0.075 0.076 0.042 0.052 0.036 0.039 0.028 0.021 0.014 0.016 0.022 0.020 0.019 0.015 0.010 0.009 0.007 0.016 * Motorcycles M5 MC 16 0.102 0.107 0.094 0.073 0.084 0.070 0.061 0.053 0.045 0.034 0.030 0.029 0.022 0.019 0.016 0.010 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.076