alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §179r. Remedies

#### (a) Jurisdiction

The several district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction, for cause shown, to prevent and restrain violations of section 179q(a) of this title.

#### (b) Relief

#### (1) Removal of seal

Except as provided in paragraph (2), relief for violation of section 179q(a) of this title shall be limited to the removal of the seal of the National Film Registry from the film involved in the violation.

#### (2) Fine and injunctive relief

In the case of a pattern or practice of the willful violation of section 179q(a) of this title, the United States district courts may order a civil fine of not more than $10,000 and appropriate injunctive relief.

(Pub. L. 104–285, title I, §108, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3381.)
#### Cortland Lounge, Inc., Appellant, v. Louis Cohen, Individually and as Receiver of Cortland Bayshore Corporation, Respondent, and Louisiana Construction Corp., Intervener, Respondent.

Order permitting intervention of the Louisiana Construction Corporation, amending title to the action and permitting the intervening party to serve its answer, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to intervener-respondent. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Nolan and Sneed, JJ., concur; Wenzel, J., not voting.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
November 3, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I W. Kerry Jackson, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.
|  

|Date: December 13, 2007 |  | By: /s/ W. Kerry Jackson           | 
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- | 
|                        |  | W. Kerry
      Jackson             | 
|                        |  | Executive Vice
      President and | 
|                        |  | Chief Financial
      Officer      | 

---
#### § 207.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to implement section 324 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act), 42 U.S.C. 5165b.
#### § 19.100 Purpose and effective date.

The purpose of these Title IX regulations is to effectuate Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (except sections 904 and 906 of those Amendments) (20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682, 1683, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688), which is designed to eliminate (with certain exceptions) discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, whether or not such program or activity is offered or sponsored by an educational institution as defined in these Title IX regulations. The effective date of these Title IX regulations shall be September 29, 2000.
§ 7.940 Compliance reviews. ( a ) FEMA may conduct compliance reviews and preaward reviews or use other similar procedures that will permit it to investigate and correct violations of the Act and this regulation. FEMA may conduct these reviews even in the absence of a complaint against a recipient. The reviews may be as comprehensive as necessary to determine whether a violation of the Act and this regulation has occurred.
( b ) If a compliance review or preaward review indicates a violation of the Act or this regulation, FEMA will attempt to achieve voluntary compliance with the Act. If voluntary compliance cannot be achieved, FEMA will arrange for enforcement as described in § 7.945.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-98-1 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah

(Tuesday, January 6, 1998)

NRC CONFERENCE SCHEDULED WITH TVA

ON RADIATION EXPOSURE AT WATTS BAR

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a predecisional enforcement

conference with officials of the Tennessee Valley Authority in Atlanta on January 13 to

discuss apparent violations of NRC procedural requirements at the Watts Bar nuclear

power plant which resulted in an unplanned radiation exposure to the fingers of a worker

during refueling operations last September 20.

The meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m. (EST) in the main conference room on the 29th

floor of the NRC Region II office, located in the Atlanta Federal Center at 61 Forsyth Street.

The conference is open to observation by the public and the press.

The NRC said the worker noted four small, foreign objects resembling kitchen garbage

bag ties lying on the reactor vessel flange on September 20 while working in the area while

the unit was defueled. The worker placed the material in a plastic bag without having an

appropriate radiation survey conducted and removed the bag from the reactor cavity area.

NRC officials said calculations indicated that the worker’s thumb and forefinger were

exposed to 3.645 rem, which is about seven percent of the 50-rem regulatory limit for

exposure of an extremity for workers in commercial nuclear power plants. The individual

is not expected to experience adverse health effects from the event.

The NRC staff is concerned that, although the worker’s hand was not overexposed,

multiple instances of failure to follow procedures created a potential for a more serious

event. The NRC will discuss with TVA apparent violations involving (1) failure to prepare

and provide an adequate radiation work permit and pre-job briefing; (2) failure to conduct

an adequate shift turnover, resulting in failure to use the latest radiological dose rates,

radiological contamination levels, and airborne radioactivity levels from surveys of the work

area and (3) failure to follow procedural requirements which cautioned workers that all

debris was to be treated as highly radioactive until determined otherwise.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that a

determination has been made that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will

be taken. The purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes, and safety

significance, to provide the licensee with an opportunity to point out errors that may have

been made in NRC inspection reports; and to enable the company to outline its proposed
corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violation or any contemplated enforcement action, such

as a civil penalty, will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC

officials at a later time.

#
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harry Kane, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or vld@nrc.gov

I-96-57 August 23, 1996

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Victor Dricks

NRC STAFF PROPOSES TO FINE VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORP.

$50,000 FOR ALLEGED VIOLATION OF NRC REQUIREMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a

$50,000 fine against Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation for

an alleged violation of NRC requirements at its Vermont Yankee

Nuclear Power Station in Vernon, Vermont.

The NRC staff conducted a special inspection June 3-14 to

look into the circumstances surrounding Vermont Yankee's discovery

in April that it had failed to analyze possible failure modes of

emergency core cooling system equipment and the effect on the

system's performance. Specifically, in its analysis of loss-ofcoolant accidents, Vermont Yankee did not consider all possible

scenarios and how they would affect the equipment necessary to

recover from the accident.

In a letter to Vermont Yankee, NRC Region I Administrator

Hubert Miller said the NRC is concerned that the condition existed

for 22 years without being identified during previous analyses

even though there was prior opportunity to do so. But Miller also

recognized and commended the utility's project team that found the

vulnerability.

The NRC staff also recognized Vermont Yankee's corrective

actions as prompt and comprehensive. Since the NRC gave Vermont

Yankee credit for both identifying and correcting the problem, a

civil penalty would not normally be issued in accordance with the

NRC's enforcement policy. However, the NRC staff decided that the

$50,000 civil penalty was appropriate because of the length of

time the condition existed and because the licensee had prior

opportunities to find the non-complying conditions.

Vermont Yankee has 30 days either to pay the proposed fine or

to request in writing that part or all of it be withdrawn.

#
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-97-87 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark (404) 562-4416 (Friday, December 12, 1997)

Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417

NRC STAFF PLANS PERFORMANCE REVIEW MEETING

AT FRAMATOME FACILITY IN LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA

Meeting Is Open to Public Observation

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a meeting with officials of Framatome Cogema

Fuels in Lynchburg, Virginia at 9:00 a.m. on Friday, December 19 at the company’s Lynchburg

Manufacturing Facility on Mount Athos Road to discuss the plant’s regulatory performance.

NRC officials will discuss a Licensee Performance Review in which the agency evaluated

performance in the areas of safety operations, safeguards, radiological controls, facility support and

licensing activities for a period from July 1, 1995 through September 28, 1997. The review is a periodic

assessment of fuel facilities licensed by the NRC and is used to form a basis for establishing the NRC‘s

inspection program at the facility for the next year as well as providing the company feedback on how the

NRC views its performance.

The NRC identified no program strengths and found areas needing improvement in all parts of the

review.

In a letter to Framatome Cogema, NRC Regional Administrator Luis Reyes said ”the review

indicates that your performance needs improvement in awareness of license conditions and procedures to

support those conditions, the implementation of fundamental controls and attention to detail to assure

adherence to regulatory requirements and the licensed safety basis for your facility.” In addition, Reyes’

letter identified as key challenges the communication of management expectations.

Based on the review, the NRC has decided to maintain its current level of inspection effort except

in the areas of management controls and material control and accountability where the inspection effort will

be increased. The NRC has also decided to place emphasis on the company’s actions to improve

evaluations of environmental sample results.

The meeting is open to interested members of the public and the media for observation, and NRC

officials will be available at the conclusion of the meeting to answer any questions.

###

EDITORS: Copies of the cover letter and summary outline of the NRC licensee performance review

of Framatome Cogema Fuels are available from this office.
AO 399 (01/09) Waiver of the Service of Summons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Southern District of Florida

Joe Alcides Rodriguez

Plaintiff

v.

Sonia Quinones, Chief of Police and Matthew Casey

Defendant

Civil Action No. 0:20-cv-61229-RAR

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Eduardo A. Maura

(Name of the plaintiff's attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

Ihave received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint,

two copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court's

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objection absence of a summons or of service.

Ialso understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file d serve an nswer or a motion under Rule 12 within

60 days from 09/09/2020 , the date when t I- ' request wa ent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the

United States). If I fail to do so, a default judgment will be ent ed against m r the entity I represent.

Date: 09/09/2020

Officer Matthew Casey

Printed name of party waiving service of summons

Signature of the ttornev or unrepresented party

Printed name

Qt-ts5 L. Quonst

C

Address

- ail Aaddre 41

1.1) 3-010c.)

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a summons

and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff located in

the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure.

"Good cause" does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant's property.

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of

a summons or of service.

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the plaintiff

and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been served.

Case 0:20-cv-61229-RAR Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2020 Page 1 of 1
### SUBCHAPTER III—NATIONAL RECORDING PRESERVATION BOARD
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-027 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, February 18, 1997)

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET MARCH 20-21 IN ROCKVILLE, MD

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on

Nuclear Waste (ACNW) has scheduled a technical meeting March 20-

21 in Rockville, Md.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will begin at 8:30

a.m. each day in Room T-2B3 in the NRC's Two White Flint North

Building, 11545 Rockville Pike.

Although meetings of the ACNW are open, they are not part of

the NRC's public hearing process. The ACNW was established in

1988 to advise the Commission on all aspects of nuclear waste

management. While anyone may attend the meeting, the committee

will consider only oral or written statements, arranged in

advance and limited to specific matters set forth in a Notice of

Meeting published in the February 18 edition of the Federal

Register.

Among the topics to be discussed during the meeting are the

defense-in-depth philosophy and the current status of the

Biosphere Validation Study. Directors of the Division of Waste

Management and the Spent Fuel Projects Office also will discuss

priorities for their respective divisions. The committee will

also prepare for its April meeting with the Commission, and will

discuss proposed reports, topics for future consideration and

miscellaneous matters.

(ACNW schedules are subject to change. Anyone planning to

attend should confirm the schedule the day before the meeting by

calling (301) 415-5024. ACNW meting notices, meeting

transcripts, and letter reports are now available on FedWorld

from the "NRC MAIN MENU." Direct Dial Access number to FedWorld

is (800) 303-9672, the local direct number is (703) 321-3339.
#

(NOTE TO EDITORS: The use of self-contained tape recorders

in the meeting room is permitted during open portions of the

meeting when a transcript is being kept. The use of still,

motion picture and television cameras - the physical installation

and presence of which will not interfere with the course of the

meeting - will be permitted both before and after the meeting,

during any recess, and, at the discretion of the committee

chairman, while the meeting is in session.)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 9:20-cv-80484

LAURA LOOMER,

Plaintiff,

v.

FACEBOOK, INC.,

Defendant.

/

SUPPLEMENT TO AMENDED COMPLAINT AND REQUEST TO IMMEDIATELY 

REMAND TO FORIDA STATE COURT

Plaintiff Laura Loomer by and through counsel respectfully requests this Court to 

immediately remand the above captioned case to Fifteenth Judicial Circuit for Palm Beach 

County as there is no diversity jurisdiction and unlike case the case styled Loomer v. Facebook, 

9:19-cv-80893, is not subject to transfer to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of 

California. Plaintiff intends to move for voluntary dismissal of case number 9:19-cv-80893

transferred today to the Northern District of California and will proceed only before the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit for Palm Beach County. Litigation in the Northern District of Califonria is cost 

prohibitive and inconvenient for her and her witnesses. Moreover, the damage which was 

inflicted upon her is centered in South Florida, where she resides and is currently running for a 

congressional seat in the U.S. House of Representatives.

The case transferred today to the Northern District of California is going on a year since 

it was filed. Plaintiff Loomer thus reasonably and for good cause requests expedited treatment

and a minute order on her remand motion in the above-captioned Florida state case to further 

timely adjudication of her claims, particularly given the nearly year old passage of time.

Case 9:20-cv-80484-RS Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2020 Page 1 of 3
2

Dated: April 13, 2020 Respectfully Submitted,

s/ Larry Klayman_______

Larry Klayman, Esq.

KLAYMAN LAW GROUP P.A. 

7050 W. Palmetto Park Rd.

Boca Raton FL 33433

Tel: (561) 558-5536

Email: leklayman@gmail.com

Case 9:20-cv-80484-RS Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2020 Page 2 of 3
1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was filed 

electronically and served through the court’s ECF system to all counsel of record or parties on 

April 13, 2020

/s/ Larry Klayman

Larry Klayman, Esq.

Case 9:20-cv-80484-RS Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2020 Page 3 of 3
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


War of 1812





Contact Us
  Lake Ontario
 Sort By:RelevanceRecently UpdatedTitle
 Show1040 per page
   war of 1812 lake ontario
 Last updated: September 2, 2014
 Tools Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
#### § 105.204 Assistance to SBA employees or members of their household.

Without the prior written approval of the Standards of Conduct Committee, no SBA Assistance, other than Disaster loans under subparagraphs (1) and (2) of section 7(b) of the Small Business Act, shall be furnished to a person when the sole proprietor, partner, officer, director or significant stockholder of the person is an SBA employee or a household member.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-187 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, September 2, 1999)

NRC TO MEET WITH NEI TO DISCUSS NUCLEAR INDUSTRY’S

Y2K ACTIVITIES

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of the

Nuclear Energy Institute on Friday, September 10, in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss the

status of Year 2000 (Y2K) readiness at nuclear power plants. Discussions will focus on

industry activities to maintain Y2K readiness, share information among power plants,

and report any changes in readiness to the NRC.

The meeting will be held at 9:00 a.m. in room O-8B4 at NRC’s headquarters

located at 11555 Rockville Pike. It will be open to public observation.

“Y2K” refers to a computer’s potential inability to recognize dates beginning with

January 1, 2000, and beyond. It arises from computer programs that use two-digit

numbers to represent a calendar year (such as “98" for 1998). For example, a

computer system could read “00" as 1900, rather than 2000, potentially causing the

computer system to malfunction.

#
### §154. Unlawful intrusion, or violation of rules and regulations

All persons who shall unlawfully intrude upon said reserve, or who shall without permission appropriate any object therein or commit unauthorized injury or waste in any form whatever upon the lands or other public property therein, or who shall violate any of the rules and regulations prescribed hereunder, shall, upon conviction, be fined in a sum not more than $1,000, or be imprisoned for a period not more than twelve months, or shall suffer both fine and imprisonment, in the discretion of the court.

(Mar. 22, 1906, ch. 1127, §4, 34 Stat. 83.)
#### § 111.15 Issuance of license.

If the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, finds that the applicant is qualified and has paid all applicable fees prescribed in § 111.96(a), the Executive Assistant Commissioner will issue a license. A license for an individual who is a member of a partnership, or an officer of an association or corporation will be issued in the name of the individual licensee and not in his or her capacity as a member or officer of the organization with which he or she is connected. The license will be forwarded to the processing Center, which will deliver it to the licensee.

[CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63314, Oct. 18, 2022]
### **[CHAPTER 50—OMITTED]**

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Chapter 50, consisting of sections 771 to 775, which was added by Pub. L. 95–598, title II, §233(a), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2665, and which related to bankruptcy courts, did not become effective pursuant to section 402(b) of Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.
ex465





 
EXHIBIT 4.65






	


Extension of Debenture Maturity Date


 


	

TO


 

	

Intellipharmaceutics
International Inc. (the “Company”)


 


	

RE:


 

	

Debenture
dated November 15, 2019, with an original face amount of US$250,000
issued by the Company to Dr. Isa Odidi and Dr. Amina Odidi (the
“Debenture”) and
the Maturity Date (as defined in the Debenture) of such
Debenture


 







 

 


The
undersigned hereby agree that the Maturity Date of the Debenture
(currently May 15, 2020) is extended to June 12, 2020.

 


DATED
as of May 15, 2020.

 




	
/s/ Isa
Odidi


	
 /s/ Amina
Odidi



	
Isa Odidi


	
 Amina Odidi