alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.781 Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment of non-originating fabric or apparel goods. ( a ) *Effect of noncompliance.* If an importer of a good for which a TPL claim is made fails to comply with any applicable requirement under this subpart, the Center director may deny preferential tariff treatment to the imported good.
( b ) *Failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment.* Where the requirements for preferential tariff treatment set forth elsewhere in this subpart are met, the Center director nevertheless may deny preferential tariff treatment to a good for which a TPL claim is made if the good is shipped through or transshipped in a country other than a Party, and the importer of the good does not provide, at the request of the Center director, evidence demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Center director that the requirements set forth in § 10.780 of this subpart were met.
§ 5.88 Testimony in litigation in which the United States is a party. ( a ) Whenever, in any legal proceeding in which the United States is a party, the attorney in charge of presenting the case for the United States requests it, the Chief Counsel shall arrange for an employee of the Agency to testify as a witness for the United States.
( b ) The attendance and testimony of named employees of the Agency may not be required in any legal proceeding by the judge or other presiding officer, by subpoena or otherwise. However, the judge or other presiding officer may, upon a showing of exceptional circumstances (such as a case in which a particular named FEMA employee has direct personal knowledge of a material fact not known to the witness made available by the Agency) require the attendance and testimony of named FEMA personnel.
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                                  Midas, Inc.
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                            As of December 28, 2002
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Percent of Stock
                                                                                  Owned or
                                                                   Place of     Controlled by
         Name                                                   Incorporation   the Registrant
   ----------------------------------------                     --------------  --------------
<S>                                                             <C>            <C>
   Midas, Inc. (Registrant)                                     Delaware            100%
   Midas International Corporation                              Delaware            100%
   Midas Illinois, Inc.                                         Illinois            100%
   Midas Realty Corporation                                     Delaware            100%
   Midas Properties                                             New York            100%
   Muffler Corporation of America                               Illinois            100%
   Dealers Wholesale Inc.                                       Delaware            100%
   Huth Inc.                                                    Delaware            100%
   International Parts Corporation                              Delaware            100%
   Parts Warehouse Inc.                                         Delaware            100%
   Midas International Corporation (Wyo)                        Wyoming             100%
   Insurance Services Management, Inc.                          Delaware            100%
   Progressive Automotive Systems, Inc.                         Delaware            100%
   Cosmic Holdings LLC                                          Delaware            100%
   MDS Automotive Holdings B.V.                                 Netherlands         100%
   Midas Automotive International B.V.                          Netherlands         100%
   Midas Canada Holdings, Ltd                                   Canada              100%
   Midas Canada, Inc.                                           Canada              100%
   Midas Realty Corporation of Canada, Inc.                     Canada              100%
   APWI Canada, Inc.
</TABLE>
### §285c. Law Revision Counsel

The management, supervision, and administration of the Office are vested in the Law Revision Counsel, who shall be appointed by the Speaker without regard to political affiliation and solely on the basis of fitness to perform the duties of the position. Any person so appointed shall serve at the pleasure of the Speaker.

(Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, §101, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on section 205(d) of House Resolution No. 988, Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 8, 1974, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–554.
### §1851. Gratuities for survivors of deceased employees

Until otherwise provided by law, there is authorized to be paid out of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives, on vouchers signed by the chairman of the Committee on House Oversight, a gratuity to the widow, widower, or heirs-at-law, of each deceased employee under the jurisdiction of the Architect of the Capitol who was assigned to duty in the House of Representatives at the time of his death. The payment of each such gratuity shall be in accordance with uniform rules and regulations adopted by the Committee on House Oversight except that no such gratuity shall be in excess of that payable to the widow, widower, or heirs-at-law of any deceased employee under the jurisdiction of the Architect of the Capitol having a comparable length of service, who was assigned to similar duties in the Senate at the time of his death.

(Pub. L. 88–454, §103, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 550; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §221(1), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1748.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 166b–4 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

Section is based on House Resolution No. 291, June 18, 1963, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 88–454.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "applicable accounts" for "contingent fund" and substituted "House Oversight" for "House Administration" in two places.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on House Oversight of House of Representatives changed to Committee on House Administration of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Jan. 6, 1999.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.852 [Reserved]
### §785. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subchapter $3,186,000 for fiscal year 2015, $3,432,000 for fiscal year 2016, $3,503,000 for fiscal year 2017, $3,581,000 for fiscal year 2018, $3,665,000 for fiscal year 2019, and $3,743,000 for fiscal year 2020.

(Pub. L. 93–112, title IV, §405, as added Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, §407, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1202; amended Pub. L. 113–128, title IV, §453, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1675.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 785, Pub. L. 93–112, title IV, §405, as added Pub. L. 95–602, title I, §117, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2979; amended Pub. L. 99–506, title V, §504, Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1829; Pub. L. 102–52, §5, June 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 262; Pub. L. 102–569, title IV, §406, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4423, authorized appropriations, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 105–220.

Another prior section 785, Pub. L. 93–112, title IV, §405, Sept. 26, 1973, 87 Stat. 388; Pub. L. 93–516, title I, §§109, 111(m), Dec. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1619, 1621; Pub. L. 93–651, title I, §§109, 111(m), Nov. 21, 1974, 89 Stat. 2–4, 2–6; Pub. L. 94–230, §§9, 11(b)(12), Mar. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 212, 213, specified certain responsibilities of the Secretary, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 95–602, §117.

Prior sections 786 and 787 were repealed by Pub. L. 95–602, title I, §117, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2977.

Section 786, Pub. L. 93–112, title IV, §406, Sept. 26, 1973, 87 Stat. 389; S. Res. 4, Feb. 4, 1977, provided that the Secretary conduct a study on the role of sheltered workshops in the rehabilitation and employment of handicapped individuals and report the results of this study to Congress within twenty-four months after Sept. 26, 1973.

Section 787, Pub. L. 93–112, title IV, §407, Sept. 26, 1973, 87 Stat. 389, provided that the Secretary conduct a study on allotment of funds among the States for grants for basic vocational rehabilitation and report the results of this study to Congress not later than June 30, 1974.

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–128 substituted "$3,186,000 for fiscal year 2015, $3,432,000 for fiscal year 2016, $3,503,000 for fiscal year 2017, $3,581,000 for fiscal year 2018, $3,665,000 for fiscal year 2019, and $3,743,000 for fiscal year 2020." for "such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 1999 through 2003."
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23538]



[[Page 61872]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers

    Notice is hereby given that, ,on September 20, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Society of Cable 
Telecommunications Engineers (``SCTE'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Society of 
Cable Telecommunications Engineers, Exton, PA. The nature and scope of 
SCTE's standards development activities are: the development of 
standards, specifications, and technical reports in the field of cable 
telecommunications. Standardization topics include, but are not limited 
to, definitions and terminology; methods of measurement and test; 
products; systems, technology rating structures; thermal limits and 
applications guides; recommended practices; materials; and safety.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23538 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 62.6 Brokers and agents writing NFIP policies through the NFIP Direct Servicing Agent.

(a) A broker or agent selling policies of flood insurance placed with the NFIP at the offices of its servicing agent must be duly licensed by the state insurance regulatory authority in the state in which the property is located.

(b) The earned commission which will be paid to any property or casualty insurance agent or broker, with respect to each policy or renewal the agent duly procures on behalf of the insured, in connection with policies of flood insurance placed with the NFIP at the offices of its servicing agent, but not with respect to policies of flood insurance issued pursuant to subpart C of this part, will not be less than $10 and is computed as follows:

(1) In the case of a new or renewal policy, the following commissions shall apply based on the total premiums paid for the policy term:

| Premium amount | Commissions (percent) |
| --- | --- |
| First $2,000 of Premium | 15 |
| Excess of $2,000 | 5 |

(2) In the case of mid-term increases in amounts of insurance added by endorsements, the following commissions shall apply based on the total premiums paid for the increased amounts of insurance:

| Premium amount | Commissions (percent) |
| --- | --- |
| First $2,000 of Premium | 15 |
| Excess of $2,000 | 5 |

(c) Any refunds of premiums authorized under this subchapter shall not affect a previously earned commission; and no agent shall be required to return that earned commission, unless the refund is made to establish a common policy term anniversary date with other insurance providing coverage against loss by other perils in which case a return of commission will be required by the agent on a pro rata basis. In such cases, the policy shall be immediately rewritten for a new term with the same amount(s) of coverage and with premium calculated at the then current rate and, as to return premium, returned, pro rata, to the insured based on the former policy's premium rate.

[46 FR 13515, Feb. 23, 1981, as amended at 53 FR 15221, Apr. 28, 1988; 57 FR 19541, May 7, 1992; 86 FR 10029, Feb. 18, 2021]
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.30c [Reserved]
### HCFC-22 baseline allowances for the 2012-1014 control period Joel French to: Drusilla Hufford 11/18/2011 06:41 PM Cc: David Donaldson, Luke Hall-Jordan, "Jesse Combs" History: This message has been replied to and forwarded.



### Ms. Hufford,

Coolgas, Inc. respectfully submits the attached letter and information and analysis contained therein for consideration by the EPA in developing its HCFC

‐ 22 baseline allowances for the 2012

‐ 1014 control period.

Sincerely,

Joel French General Counsel 30045 FM 2978 Magnolia, Texas 77354 Direct: 281.259.1521 Cell: 281.799.7425 FAX: 281.766.1901 Toll Free: 800.366.1356 Joel.French@coolgas.com

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that your access is unauthorized, and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message including any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

11-18-11 Coolgas, Inc.--EPA HCFC baseline allocation reduction recommendation.doc.pd f
#### § 111.77 Notice of vacated or modified order.

If, pursuant to § 111.76 or for any other reason, the Executive Assistant Commissioner issues an order vacating or modifying an earlier order under § 111.74 suspending or revoking a broker's license or permit, or assessing a monetary penalty, the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, will notify the broker in writing and will publish a notice of the new order in the Federal Register.

[CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63320, Oct. 18, 2022]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-27 April 14, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE AT VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of the Vermont Yankee

nuclear power plant next Wednesday to discuss the results of the agency’s latest Plant Performance

Review for the facility. The plant, which is located in Vernon, Vt., is operated by Vermont Yankee

Nuclear Power Corporation.

Issuance of the reviews was announced in NRC news release 00-059 on April 5. The Plant

Performance Review letter can be found on the agency’s web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr/.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, will be held at 2 p.m. at the

Governor Hunt House, 546 Governor Hunt Road, Vernon. At its conclusion, NRC staff will be

available to answer questions from interested observers and to meet with state and local officials.

#
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateAdjudications (Hearings)

# 10 CFR Part 2: Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings and Issuance of Orders

On this page:
        - Overview
        - Part 2 Rulemakings

## Overview

10 CFR Part 2 sets forth the NRC's procedures governing the conduct of proceedings involving
        -  Granting, suspending, revoking, amending, or taking other action with respect to any license, construction permit, or application to transfer a license 
        -  Issuing orders and demands for information to persons subject to the Commission's jurisdiction, including licensees and persons not licensed by the Commission 
        -  Imposing civil penalties under section 234 of the Act 
        -  Public rulemaking 

## Part 2 Rulemakings

The Commission periodically revises Part 2 through rulemaking. For the convenience of the public, a list of Part 2 rulemakings significantly affecting the provisions governing hearing procedures since 2004 are listed below.
        - 2012 Amendments to Adjudicatory Process Rules (08/03/12)
        - Model Milestones for NRC Adjudicatory Proceedings (4/20/05)
        - Corrections to January 14, 2004 Final Rule (5/11/04)
        - Final Rule Adding New Subparts C, N, and O (1/14/04)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 23, 2021
MARC LLUS 

s H A L E c 0 A L I T I 0 NTM 

July 23, 2014 /'-, =· 

.< /~ 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Foxx: 

I respectfully submit this letter in reaction to DOT Order 2014-6-6 that ruled on the future status of EAS 

subsidies for thirteen communities and outlined the petition process for acquiring a waiver. On behalf of 

the Marcellus Shale Coalition (MSC), I fully recommend and support DOT granting a waiver to the 

communities of Bradford, PA and Franklin/Oil City, PA giving them the opportunity to obtain a new air 

carrier and rebuild community enplanements while continuing to receive vital air service in the interim. 

Founded in 2008, the MSC is a trade association representing over 275 member companies engaged in 

the production, transportation and supply chain support for this growing segment of our regional 

economy. The MSC and our member companies are focused on the safe and state of the art 

development and transportation of the Marcellus natural gas and natural gas liquids. The MSC is also 

focused upon public education and engagement. 

Many large energy sector corporations, as well as countless Marcellus Shale industry support 

businesses, have established supply chain and related business activities in the Marcellus Shale footprint 

of the aforementioned airports. In addition, regional and global headquarters in the Pittsburgh region 

have been established as part of this growth. Industry professionals, seeking the advantages that direct 

air service would offer, could significantly contribute to enplanements by traveling to/from field offices. 

Pittsburgh International Airport's (PIT) daily nonstop flights to other cities with a large energy sector 

presence like Houston and Dallas could also be utilized by Marcellus Shale firms. A multiyear study 

organized by PIT, the Pennsylvania Air Service Committee and other stakeholders and conducted by an 

independent consulting firm to determine the feasibility of intrastate air service, termed "PIT 

Connector", was recently published. During the survey section of the study, overwhelming support was 

received from EAS communities highlighting preference for air service in these area's to PIT. 

The necessity of air service for individuals and businesses in these communities has never been at a 

more critical time. The MSC believes in the viability of air service to our industry and as such; proposals 

containing a more favorable destination and appropriate aircraft designed to boost enplanements will 

justify issuance of a waiver to both Bradford and Franklin. 

;,-~7;Jf)."';(___, (Jy.(J 

David J. Spigelmyer 

President 

24 Summit Park • 2na Fl • 152751 p 706.5160 IF 2.706.5170
HomeAbout NRCFire ProtectionRelated Information

# Fire Protection Regulations in 10 CFR Part 50

Regulations issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) are found in Chapter I of Title 10, "Energy," of the *Code of Federal Regulations* (CFR). Chapter I is divided into Parts 1 through 199. Among these, all NRC licensees are required to implement the regulations in 10 CFR Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," to protect the public, occupational workers, and the environment from fire-related risks. In particular, the following sections of 10 CFR Part 50 are most relevant to fire protection for licensed facilities and materials:

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 10 CFR Part 50
          - Guidelines for FP in NPPs
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Procedures
          - Administrative Letters
          - Bulletins
          - Circulars
          - Generic Letters
          - Information Notices
          - Regulatory Issue Summaries
          - Regulatory Guides
          - Commission (SECY) Papers
          - Generic Issues
          - Staff-Prepared NUREGs
          - Contractor-Prepared NUREGs
          - Conference Proceedings
          - Brochures
          - FAQs About Fire Protection

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-66 June 9, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Special Projects Office

staff will meet with officials of Northeast Utilities and Parsons

Power Group on Friday, June 12, to discuss the Independent

Corrective Action Verification Program at Millstone 2 in

Waterford, Ct.

The meeting is scheduled for 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., at the

Leland F. Sillin Training Center at the Millstone site. The

agenda includes an update on the status of the ICAVP, the exit

meeting for the Tier 3 inspection, and a technical discussion on

Parsons’ discrepancy report on setpoints for instrument controls.

The Tier 3 inspection involved an assessment of NU’s current

design control processes, a review of the adequacy of past design

changes and a review of NU corrective actions outside the scope

of the ICAVP-selected systems.

#