alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-8 January 28, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPUN) on Friday, January 31,

to discuss the results of the NRC's recent safety system functional

inspection at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1, in

Middletown, Pa.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will begin at

11 a.m. in the Training Center Auditorium at the TMI site.

#
### §3199. Counseling and job placement

#### (a) Assessment and counseling

The Secretary shall arrange for assessment and counseling for each enrollee at regular intervals to measure progress in the academic and career and technical education and training programs carried out through the Job Corps.

#### (b) Placement

The Secretary shall arrange for assessment and counseling for enrollees prior to their scheduled graduations to determine their capabilities and, based on their capabilities, shall place the enrollees in employment leading to economic self-sufficiency for which the enrollees are trained or assist the enrollees in participating in further activities described in this part. In arranging for the placement of graduates in jobs, the Secretary shall utilize the one-stop delivery system to the maximum extent practicable.

#### (c) Status and progress

The Secretary shall determine the status and progress of enrollees scheduled for graduation and make every effort to assure that their needs for further activities described in this part are met.

#### (d) Services to former enrollees

The Secretary may provide such services as the Secretary determines to be appropriate under this part to former enrollees.

(Pub. L. 113–128, title I, §149, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1548.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 19—JOB TRAINING PARTNERSHIP**
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417

No: II-97-49 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts:Ken Clark (404) 562-4416 (Tuesday, June 24, 1997)

Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417

NRC STAFF PLANS PERFORMANCE REVIEW

AT B & W FACILITIES IN LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA

Meeting Is Open to Public Observation

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a meeting with officials

of the Babcock & Wilcox Naval Nuclear Fuel Division in Lynchburg, Virginia, at

9:00 a.m. (EDT) on Tuesday, July 1, to discuss the plant’s performance. The

meeting will be held at the Babcock & Wilcox Group Headquarters, Route 726, Mt.

Athos Road in Lynchburg.

NRC officials will discuss withB&Wa review performed by the agency in

which performance was evaluated in the areas of safety operations, safeguards,

radiological controls and facility support for a period from July 1, 1994 through

September 30, 1996.

The NRC review concludes that the plant staff's performance was focused on

safety in all areas. The review indicates that performance in radiological

controls and security was excellent and performance was good in other areas.

In a letter to B & W on May 16, NRC Regional Administrator Luis Reyes wrote

that "you significantly improved in imlementing followup action to correct

deficiencies identified during your self-assessments and audits." However, Reyes

noted that the facility faces challenges in maintenance of equipment and

operations in the uranium recovery area.

The review is used to form a basis for establishing the NRC's inspection

program at the facility for the next year as well as providing the company

feedback on how the NRC views its performance.

The meeting is open to interested members of the public and the media for

observation and NRC officials will be available at the conclusion of the meeting

to answer any questions.

###
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-53 June 5, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF PLANS DISCUSSION OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE

AT ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC. FUEL PLANT IN METROPOLIS, ILLINOIS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a meeting

with officials of the AlliedSignal, Inc., commercial nuclear fuel

facility in Metropolis, Illinois, on Thursday, June 12, to

discuss the plant's performance.

The meeting will start at 2 p.m. (CDT) in the Council Room

of the Metropolis City Hall, 106 West Fifth Street in Metropolis.

It is open for public observation.

NRC officials will discuss with AlliedSignal a Licensee

Performance Review performed by the agency in which performance

in safety operations, radiological controls, and facility support

was reviewed for a period from January 1, 1995, through January

10 of this year.

The NRC review concludes that "overall performance was

focused on safety" but weaknesses were noted in the areas of

waste management, preventive maintenance, procedural adherence

and adequacy, and knowledge of license requirements.

####

(Note: A copy of the full report may be obtained from the Region

III Office of Public Affairs at the telephone numbers or e-mail

address above or from the NRC internet site at

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports.)
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07370

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 07370\07370_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07370\07370_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

07370\07370_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07370\07370_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07370\07370_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07370\07370_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

07370\Certification Statement_07370.pdf Plant certification statement

x 07370\Supporting Documentation\07370_FEIS.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07370\Supporting Documentation\07370_Oyster Creek Water Balance Diagram.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07370\Supporting Documentation\07370_SEIS appendices.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07370\Supporting Documentation\07370_SEIS text.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 98-45 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson December 22, 1998

OFFICE: 817-860-8128

PAGER: 888-876-2331

E-Mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC PROPOSES TO FINE ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY $55,000

FOR VIOLATIONS AT PALO VERDE NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a civil penalty of $55,000

against Arizona Public Service Co. for failing to promptly detect and correct improperly installed

check valves in the emergency core cooling system at its Palo Verde Nuclear Generating

Station, a three-reactor plant about 50 miles west of Phoenix, AZ.

The emergency core cooling system is designed to pump cooling water into the nuclear

core during an accident in which the normal flow of water is lost. Check valves allow the flow of

water in only one direction, and the improperly installed check valves were leaking excessively

in the direction from which flow should have been blocked. Palo Verde operators failed to

detect the improperly assembled check valves for approximately six years in Unit 1, five years

in Unit 2 and one and one-half years in Unit 3 despite opportunities to have done so.

The NRC staff classified the violations as a single Severity Level III problem, which

carries a base civil penalty of $55,000. The NRC uses a four-level scale to rate the severity of

violations, with Severity Level I being the most serious.

The NRC considers the potential safety consequences from this violation to warrant a

Level III citation and civil penalty because emergency cooling water flow to the nuclear core

during some accident conditions would have been reduced below that specified in the plant’s

final safety analysis. This condition would only have occurred if one of the emergency core

cooling system pumps failed to start when needed during a loss of coolant accident.

Palo Verde operators have re-assembled the check valves, tested the system for

reverse leakage and restored the emergency core cooling system to proper operation since the

problem was detected in April of this year. An NRC inspection was conducted from May

through July, and a predecisional enforcement conference was held on September 14.

Arizona Public Service Co. has 30 days to respond in writing to the NRC’s Notice of

Violation. The response must document specific actions taken to prevent recurrence of the

violations. During this time the company may pay the fine or file a protest.

###
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 97-36 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson June 18, 1997

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

CALLAWAY NUCLEAR PLANT RATED ‘SUPERIOR’ IN THREE AREAS

‘GOOD’ IN FOURTH IN NRC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Callaway Nuclear Plant, near Fulton, Missouri, received performance ratings of

“Superior” in maintenance, engineering and plant support, and “good” in plant operations in the

Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s latest systematic assessment of licensee performance (SALP)

for the facility.

The SALP report was sent Friday, June 13, to Union Electric Co., which operates the

plant. The report evaluates the plant’s performance from April 30, 1995, through May 10 of this

year.

NRC staff and Callaway officials will discuss the report during a meeting set for 2 p.m.

Wednesday, July 2, at the Callaway Emergency Operations Facility and Visitors Center. The

meeting is open for public observation. NRC officials will be available afterwards to speak with

reporters, state and local officials, and members of the public.

NRC systematic assessment reports rate licensed nuclear reactor operators in four

functional areas -- plant operations, maintenance, engineering, and plant support -- and assigns

ratings of Category 1, 2, or 3 depending on whether their performance in those areas was

superior, good or acceptable. Callaway was given the following scores on the current SALP and

previous SALP in April 1995:

Functional areas & ratings

Current Previous

Plant Operations 2 1

Maintenance 1 1

Engineering 1 1

Plant Support 1 1
In his cover letter to the report, NRC Regional Administrator Ellis W. Merschoff noted

that in the Maintenance, Engineering and Plant Support areas Callaway continued to display a

superior safety focus. Especially noteworthy were inter-departmental communications and the

material condition of safety-related plant systems, structures and components. In the Operations

area, good safety focus was highlighted by excellent performance during transient operations and

the skills of the individual operators.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 655 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 655

To amend the Natural Gas Act to provide that the United States district 
courts shall not have jurisdiction to condemn property in which a State 
              holds any interest, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 2021

Mr. Merkley (for himself and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Natural Gas Act to provide that the United States district 
courts shall not have jurisdiction to condemn property in which a State 
              holds any interest, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ending Natural Gas Companies' 
Seizure of Land for Export Profits Act''.

SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS OVER CERTAIN 
              EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS.

    Section 7(h) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717f(h)) is 
amended--
            (1) in the second sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``situated: Provided, That the'' 
                and inserting the following: ``situated.
            ``(3) Jurisdiction of united states district courts.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The''; and
                    (B) by striking ``The practice'' and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(2) Practice and procedure.--The practice'';
            (2) in the first sentence, by striking ``(h) When any 
        holder'' and inserting the following:
    ``(h) Eminent Domain.--
            ``(1) In general.--When any holder''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) State property.--The United States district 
                courts shall not have jurisdiction to condemn property 
                in which a State owns any interest.''.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF EMINENT DOMAIN FOR EXPORTS.

    Section 7(h) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717f(h)) (as amended 
by section 2) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Limitation on use of eminent domain for exports.--A 
        holder of a certificate of public convenience and necessity may 
        not exercise the right of eminent domain under this subsection 
        if the project covered by the certificate is a project to be 
        constructed substantially for the purpose of transporting 
        natural gas to an LNG terminal or to other pipelines for export 
        from the United States to a foreign country.''.
                                 <all>
```
No: 23-045 July 24, 2023

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Makes Available “Hermes 2” Construction Permit Application

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received a construction permit application from 

Kairos Power, LLC, which requests permission to build “Hermes 2,” a two-unit version of its test 

reactor. The application for a site next to the company’s existing project in Oak Ridge, 

Tennessee, is now available for public inspection on the NRC website. 

Kairos filed the application on July 14, providing a preliminary safety analysis report for 

the two-unit facility. Each 35-megawatt reactor is the same size as the original test reactor the 

NRC is currently reviewing. Each reactor also would use molten salt to cool its core, and they 

would share a power generation system. The company will have to submit a separate application 

for an operating license in the future.

The NRC staff is reviewing the application to determine if it is complete and acceptable 

for processing. If the application is determined to be sufficient, the staff will docket it and start a 

detailed technical review. The NRC will then publish a notice of opportunity to request an 

adjudicatory hearing on the application before the NRC’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board.

Information about Kairos’ Hermes reactor design is available on the NRC website.
§ 333.11 Priority ratings. ( a ) *Levels of priority.* ( 1 ) There are two levels of priority established by Federal Priorities and Allocations System regulations, identified by the rating symbols “DO” and “DX.”
( 2 ) All DO rated orders have equal priority with each other and take preference over unrated orders. All DX rated orders have equal priority with each other and take preference over DO rated orders and unrated orders. (For resolution of conflicts among rated orders of equal priority, see § 333.14(c)).
( 3 ) In addition, a Directive issued by FEMA regarding priority treatment for a given item takes preference over any DX rated order, DO rated order, or unrated order, as stipulated in the Directive. (For a full discussion of Directives, see § 333.52).
( b ) *Program identification symbols.* Program identification symbols indicate which approved program is being supported by a rated order. Program identification symbols, in themselves, do not connote any priority.
( c ) *Priority ratings.* A priority rating consists of the rating symbol—DO or DX—and the program identification symbol.
§ 19.510 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment and hiring.* A recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and hiring of employees. Where a recipient has been found to be presently discriminating on the basis of sex in the recruitment or hiring of employees, or has been found to have so discriminated in the past, the recipient shall recruit members of the sex so discriminated against so as to overcome the effects of such past or present discrimination.
( b ) *Recruitment patterns.* A recipient shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at entities that furnish as applicants only or predominantly members of one sex if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 19.500 through 19.550.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-21 March 9, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC MARCH 14 TO DISCUSS

IP2 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE FAILURE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with the public on Tuesday evening, March 14,

to discuss the steam generator tube failure at Indian Point 2 on February 15. The plant, operated by

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, is located in Buchanan, N.Y.

The meeting will be held at the New York State Armory, 955 Washington Street, in Peekskill,

N.Y. It begins at 7:00 p.m. The NRC staff will begin the meeting with a short presentation and then

respond to questions from the audience.

Consolidated Edison workers manually shut down the plant at 7:29 p.m. on February 15

following indications of a steam generator tube failure in one of the plant’s four steam generators.

The steam generators are components that transfer heat from the reactor systems to the powergenerating portion of a nuclear power plant. Plant safety systems performed as designed during the

shutdown.

In response, the NRC sent an Augmented Inspection Team (AIT) to the site to look into the

event and its causes. Once the AIT has finished evaluating the data it has collected, a separate meeting

with Consolidated Edison will be held to discuss the team’s findings. That meeting will be open to the

public for observation.

The cause and nature of the steam generator tube failure is the subject of a separate NRC

review. That work is on-going.

#
### §2343. Venue

The venue of a proceeding under this chapter is in the judicial circuit in which the petitioner resides or has its principal office, or in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(e), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 622.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 1033. | Dec. 29, 1950, ch. 1189, §3, 64 Stat. 1130. |

Statutes at Large

The section is reorganized for clarity and conciseness. The word "is" is substituted for "shall be". The word "petitioner" is substituted for "party or any of the parties filing the petition for review" in view of the definition of "petitioner" in section 2341 of this title.
# Jurnalul Oficial C 270I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 270I |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 6317 august 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 270I

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 6317 august 2020

---

| Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informări |
| | INFORMĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE |
| | Comisia Europeană |
| 2020/C 270 I/01 | Declarația Comisiei referitoare la Directiva (UE) 2019/1937 a Parlamentului European și a Consiliului privind protecția persoanelor care raportează încălcări ale dreptului Uniunii | 1 |

Cuprins

Pagina

IV   Informări

INFORMĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE

Comisia Europeană

2020/C 270 I/01

Declarația Comisiei referitoare la Directiva (UE) 2019/1937 a Parlamentului European și a Consiliului privind protecția persoanelor care raportează încălcări ale dreptului Uniunii

1

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

IV Informări

INFORMĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE

Comisia Europeană

| 17.8.2020 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | CI 270/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2020

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

CI 270/1

---

Declarația Comisiei referitoare la Directiva (UE) 2019/1937 a Parlamentului European și a Consiliului privind protecția persoanelor care raportează încălcări ale dreptului Uniunii

(2020/C 270 I/01)

În momentul revizuirii care urmează să fie realizată în conformitate cu articolul 27 din Directiva (UE) 2019/1937 a Parlamentului European și a Consiliului din 23 octombrie 2019 privind protecția persoanelor care raportează încălcări ale dreptului Uniunii (1), Comisia va lua în considerare posibilitatea de a propune extinderea domeniului său de aplicare la anumite acte bazate pe articolele 153 și 157 din TFUE, după consultarea partenerilor sociali, dacă este cazul, în conformitate cu articolul 154 din TFUE.

---

(1)  JO L 305, 26.11.2019, p. 17.

---
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-18 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, February 1, 1999)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of

Isotopes has scheduled meetings of two of its subcommittees in Rockville, Maryland. The

diagnostic subcommittee will meet on February 23-24, followed by a meeting of the therapeutic

subcommittee on February 25-26.

At both meetings, members will discuss comments received on the proposed revision to

NRC’s rule on the medical use of byproduct material (Part 35), published for comment last

August.

The meetings, which are open to the public, will be held in Room O-4B6 of the agency’s

One White Flint North building at 11555 Rockville Pike. Each meeting will begin at 8:00 a.m.

and continue until 5:00 p.m. the first day, and until noon on the second day.

Those wishing to provide a written statement should notify Mary Louise Roe, at 301-

415-7809. Other aspects of the meeting, including opportunities for questions, will be

described in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

###