alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 61.5 Deductibles. FEMA must provide policyholders with deductible options in various amounts, up to and including $10,000, subject to the following minimum deductible amounts: ( a ) The minimum deductible for policies covering pre-FIRM buildings charged less than full-risk rates with building coverage amounts less than or equal to $100,000 is $1,500.
( b ) The minimum deductible for policies covering pre-FIRM buildings charged less than full-risk rates with building coverage amounts greater than $100,000 is $2,000.
( c ) The minimum deductible for policies covering post-FIRM buildings and pre-FIRM buildings charged full risk rates, with building coverage amounts equal to or less than $100,000 is $1,000.
( d ) The minimum deductible for policies covering post-FIRM buildings and pre-FIRM buildings charged full risk rates, with building coverage amounts greater than $100,000 is $1,250.
[85 FR 43958, July 20, 2020]
[EXHIBIT 31.2]

          CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Jack Chien, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of Med Gen,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the
registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  December 29, 2007

By:  /s/Jack Chien
   ------------------------------------
   Jack Chien, Chief Financial Officer,
   and Principal Accounting Officer
§ 3502.29 If I am a guardian or trustee for a trust holding on behalf of a beneficiary, what information must I give BLM in my qualifications statement? Send us: ( a ) A signed statement setting forth: ( 1 ) The beneficiary's citizenship;
( 2 ) Your citizenship;
( 3 ) The grantor's citizenship, if the trust is revocable; and
( 4 ) That the acreage holdings of the beneficiary, the guardian or trustee, or the grantor, if the trust is revocable, cumulatively do not exceed the acreage limitations in § 3503.37 of this part; and
( b ) A copy of the court order or other document authorizing or creating the trust or guardianship.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Garth S. Bailey, the Chief Executive Officer, and Chief
Financial Officer of Aero Marine Engine, Inc. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.     The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June
30, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 14th
day of October, 2003.


                                  By:  /s/ Garth S. Bailey
                                  --------------------------------
                                           Garth S. Bailey,
                                           Chief Executive Officer, and
                                           Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Aero Marine Engine, Inc. and will be retained by Aero Marine
Engine, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

<PAGE>
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-13   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 1 of 1
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Nai (“Jack”) Wang and Wang Investment Houston Partnership v. Jose

Gonzalez, All American Demolition, LLC, and Nelson Equipment,

Ltd.

Appellate case number: 01

- 11

- 00434

- CV

Trial court case number: 2009

- 26214

Trial court: 295th District Court, Harris County, Texas

On January 29, 2013, Appellees Jose Gonzalez and All American Demolition, LLC filed

a m otion for rehearing. It is ordered that responses of Appellants Nai (“Jack”) Wang and Wang

Investment Houston Partnership and Appellee Nelson Equipment, Ltd., if any, are due Monday,

February 11, 2013

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 31, 2013
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Philip Gay,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Grill Concepts, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Grill
Concepts, Inc.



By:

/s/ Philip GayName:

Philip GayTitle:

CEO and Principal Executive OfficerNovember 9, 2007
### Part A—Workforce Investment
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-22 February 28, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 4

ON APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT CLINTON NUCLEAR POWER STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet March 4

with officials of Illinois Power Company for an predecisional

enforcement conference on recent inspection findings at the

Clinton Nuclear Power Station. The station is located near

Clinton, Illinois.

The meeting, which is open to public observation, will be at

10 a.m. March 4 in the Third Floor Conference Room, NRC Region

III Office, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL.

Among the issues to be considered are deficiencies in the

testing of check valves in the plant’s feedwater system; an

improper time delay setting in a circuit breaker for a diesel

generator in the plant’s emergency core cooling system;

inadequate testing procedures for the plant’s emergency diesel

generators; and failure to perform required safety evaluations

for changes in spent fuel pool cooling procedures and for

instances when equipment did not meet original design criteria.

A decision is pending on apparent violations associated with

the September 5 shutdown of the plant. The issues to be

discussed in the predecisional enforcement conference on March 4

are a separate enforcement action.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean

the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that

enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety

significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out

any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report;

and to enable the company to outline its proposed corrective

actions.

No decisions on the apparent violations or any contemplated

enforcement action, such as a fine, will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later date.
####

Nuclear Regulatory Commission news announcements are issued by fax and by

internet e-mail. If you wish to receive Region III news releases by e-mail,

send a message to opa3@nrc.gov. To receive news announcements issued by NRC

Headquarters and all NRC regional offices by e-mail, send an e-mail message to

listproc@nrc.gov with the message: subscribe pr-opa followed by your name. A

weekly printed summary of news releases is available by writing Office of

Public Affairs, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555.

News releases are also available on the NRC's internet web site at the

address: <http://www.nrc.gov/OPA>.

A listing of NRC staff meetings with licensees and other organization which

are open to the public is available through a computer online system (1-

800/952-9676), the Fedworld online system (1-800/303-9672), and the NRC's web

site <http://www.nrc.gov>. A recorded listing of meetings may be heard by

calling 1-800/952-9674.
### [§1057. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–34, title XI, §1131(c)(2), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 980]

Section, added Pub. L. 94–455, title X, §1015(c), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1618, related to election to treat transfer to foreign trust, etc., as taxable exchange.

A prior section 1057 was renumbered section 1062 of this title.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tufco Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Date: May 14, 2004
    
    /s/ Louis LeCalsey, IIILouis LeCalsey, III
President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 304.5 Audits and records. ( a ) *Audits.* FEMA will maintain adequate auditing, accounting and review procedures as outlined in FEMA guidance material and 2 CFR parts 200 and 3002.
( b ) *Records.* Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other records pertinent to a consolidated grant shall be retained for a period of three years from submission of final billing and shall be available to the Administrator, FEMA, and the Comptroller General of the United States, all as prescribed in FEMA guidance material and in accordance with 2 CFR parts 200 and 3002.
[79 FR 76088, Dec. 19, 2014]
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear at 68 FR 51349, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 117.19 Effect on other regulations. ( a ) All regulations, orders or like directions heretofore issued by SBA which impose requirements designed to prohibit any discrimination against individuals on the grounds of age and which authorize the suspension or termination of or refusal to grant or to continue financial assistance to any applicant for or recipient of such assistance for failure to comply with such requirements, are hereby superseded to the extent that such discrimination is prohibited by this part, except that nothing in this part shall be deemed to relieve any person of any obligation assumed or imposed under any such superseded regulation, order, instruction, or like direction prior to the effective date of this part. Nothing in this part, however, shall be deemed to supersede any of the following (including future amendments thereof): ( 1 ) Executive Order 11246, as amended, and regulations issued thereunder;
( 2 ) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended;
( 3 ) The Equal Credit Opportunity Act, as amended and Regulation B of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, (12 CFR part 202);
( 4 ) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
( 5 ) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968;
( 6 ) Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972;
( 7 ) Section 633(b) of the Small Business Act;
( 8 ) Part 113 of title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations (13 CFR part 113); or
( 9 ) Any other statute, order, regulation or instruction, insofar as such order, regulations, or instruction prohibits discrimination on the grounds of age in any program or activity or situation to which this part is inapplicable on any other ground.
#### Peggy C. Brainard, Appellant, v. Frank S. Brainard, Jr., Respondent.

*759Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 97-37 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson June 20, 1997

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

ENVIROCARE AGREES TO ACTIONS

REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH NRC REGULATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission sent a Confirmatory Action Letter June 12 to Envirocare of Utah,

Inc. which outlines actions the company has agreed to take to promptly dispose of an excessive amount of

uranium-235 that inspectors learned was held at the disposal facility near Clive, Utah.

NRC inspectors learned June 10 that more than 2,400 grams of uranium-235 had been held in

temporary storage at the facility. The inspection was conducted in response to findings of an inspection

conducted by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality. Conditions of the State of Utah license under

which Envirocare is permitted to dispose of mildly radioactive waste material allow only 350 grams of “special

nuclear material,” which includes uranium-235, to be held at the site without being placed in a permanent

disposal cell. Possession and processing of more than 350 grams of special nuclear material before burial in

a disposal cell would require an NRC license.

The uranium-235 that Envirocare is holding is dispersed in contaminated soil and other waste material

it has received from government and industrial cleanup projects.

NRC, the State, and Envirocare officials agree that the material present at the site poses no health or safety

risk based on the quantity of uranium-235. The uranium-235 is dispersed throughout tons of dirt and debris

where it poses no threat of a nuclear chain reaction. Once the debris is dumped into the licensed, permanent

disposal cells it is no longer subject to the 350-gram limit.

Envirocare agreed to submit a plan on June 16 to the NRC outlining how it will either remove the

material from the facility or place it in a licensed disposal cell. Envirocare’s plan also was required to ensure

that future deliveries of waste materials will not result in possession of special nuclear material in excess of the

maximum allowed by its license. The company submitted its plan on schedule, and officials state that they

intend to comply with the actions described in the letter. The NRC and Envirocare discussed actions proposed

by Envirocare for future deliveries of special nuclear material during a public meeting on June 19.

The State has issued a separate enforcement action in response to its investigation of this issue for

violation of the state license.

-30-
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

SCANZ TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JEWMON ENTERPRISES, LLC, et al.,

 

 Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-22957-SCOLA/TORRES

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO 

STAY CERTAIN DEADLINES AND TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER

Plaintiff Scanz Technologies, Inc. (“Scanz” or “Plaintiff”), by and through the undersigned 

counsel, hereby respectfully gives notice of striking Docket Entry 140, which was inadvertently 

filed. Plaintiff will promptly file its response to Motion to Stay.

Dated: June 16, 2021 Respectfully Submitted,

SQUIRE LAW GROUP, P.A.

305 W. Atlantic Ave, Suite 5

Delray Beach, FL 33444

Phone: 888.788.8816

Fax: 786.577.0425

dlage@squirelawgroup.com

By: /s/Gustavo D. Lage

Gustavo D. Lage

Florida Bar No. 972551

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SCANZ TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case 1:20-cv-22957-RNS Document 141 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on June 16, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of 

the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the Electronic 

Service List for this Case.

Dated: June 16, 2021 s/Gustavo D. Lage

Gustavo D. Lage

Case 1:20-cv-22957-RNS Document 141 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2021 Page 2 of 2
### [Subpart I—Repealed]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Association of Records Managers and Administrators (“ARMA International”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Association of Records Managers and Administrators, Lenexa, KS. The nature and scope of ARMA International's standards development activities are: standards and best practices for the implementation of policies, systems and procedures that manage recorded information in a variety of formats throughout the life cycle. These standards promote efficiency and cost savings by reducing wasted effort, ensuring consistency of procedures over time and reducing risk exposure.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-23514 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Docket No. FAA-2013-0624
# Combine-AlarmsPSFs
#### Felix TORRES Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-16145.

D.C. No. CV 01-1574-SYI.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Felix Torres, Jr. appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal without leave to amend of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Americans with Disabilities Act action alleging the California Supreme Court and California State Bar discriminated against him on the basis of race and disability during attorney disciplinary proceedings. We review de novo dismissal for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). *Barren v. Harrington,*152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

Despite Torres’s attempt to plead his action on behalf of all disabled attorneys *650and attorneys of color, he is in effect challenging the result of his individual disciplinary hearing as he did in his previous federal action dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. *See Worldwide Church of God v. McNair,*805 F.2d 888, 891-92 (9th Cir.1986) (pursuant to the *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine, federal district courts lack jurisdiction to review constitutional claims that are inextricably intertwined with a state court decision denying an application for bar admission); *Costantini v. Trans World Airlines,*681 F.2d 1199, 1201-02 (9th Cir.1982). For this reason, Torres’s action was properly dismissed without leave to amend because its defect is incurable. *See Cato v. United States,*70 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th Cir.1995).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.