alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 618 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 618

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify and extend the 
 deduction for charitable contributions for individuals not itemizing 
                              deductions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2021

Mr. Lankford (for himself, Mr. Coons, Mr. Lee, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Scott 
 of South Carolina, Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. Collins, and Ms. Cortez Masto) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify and extend the 
 deduction for charitable contributions for individuals not itemizing 
                              deductions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Universal Giving Pandemic Response 
and Recovery Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR CHARITABLE 
              CONTRIBUTIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS NOT ITEMIZING DEDUCTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (p) of section 170 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
    ``(p) Special Rule for Taxpayers Who Do Not Elect To Itemize 
Deductions.--In the case of a taxable year beginning in 2021 or 2022, 
the deduction under this subsection for the taxable year shall be equal 
to so much of the deduction determined under this section (without 
regard to this subsection) for such taxable year as does not exceed an 
amount equal to \1/3\ of the amount of the standard deduction with 
respect to such individual for such taxable year. This subsection shall 
apply only in the case of an individual who does not elect to itemize 
deductions for the taxable year.''.
    (b) Elimination of Penalty.--
            (1) In general.--Section 6662(b) of the Internal Revenue 
        Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph (9).
            (2) Increased penalty.--Section 6662 of such Code is 
        amended by striking subsection (l).
            (3) Conforming amendment.--Section 6751(b)(2)(A) of such 
        Code is amended by striking ``6655, or 6662 (but only with 
        respect to an addition to tax by reason of subsection (b)(9) 
        thereof)'' and inserting ``or 6655''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
§ 333.16 Changes or cancellations of priority ratings and rated orders. ( a ) The priority rating on a rated order may be changed or cancelled by: ( 1 ) An official action of FEMA; or
( 2 ) Written electronic notification from the person who placed the rated order (including a Delegate Agency).
( b ) If an unrated order is amended so as to make it a rated order, or a DO rating is changed to a DX rating, the supplier must give the appropriate preferential treatment to the order as of the date the change is received by the supplier.
( c ) An amendment to a rated order that significantly alters a supplier's original production or delivery schedule shall constitute a new rated order as of the date of its receipt. The supplier must accept or reject the amended order according to the provisions of § 333.13.
( d ) The following amendments do not constitute a new rated order: A change in shipping destination; A reduction in the total amount of the order; an increase in the total amount of the order which has negligible impact upon deliveries; a minor variation in size or design (prior to the start of production); or a change which is agreed upon between the supplier and the customer.
( e ) A person must cancel any rated orders that the person (or a predecessor in interest) has placed with suppliers or cancel the priority ratings on those orders if the person no longer needs the items in those orders to fill a rated order.
( f ) A person adding a rating to an unrated order, or changing or cancelling a priority rating must promptly provide written electronic notification to all suppliers to whom the order was sent of the addition, change, or cancellation.
#### Nancy O. de Marigny, Respondent-Appellant, v. Alfred F. de Marigny, Appellant-Respondent.

Peek, P. J., Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur in this memorandum; Dore and Cohn, JJ., vote to affirm. [193 Misc. 189, 250.] [See *post,*p. 822.]
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice 134437 (61) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. KENT A. MCNEIL, FRANKLIN E. FISHER, Stephen J. Markman, ROGER GRIFFIN, SCO TT WAY, and JEFF Justices LEGATO, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 134437 COA: 272410 Charlevoix CC: 05-088120-CZ CHARLEVOIX COUNTY and NORTHWEST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY HEALTH AGENCY, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of May 2, 2008, the Court directed the parties to file supplemental briefs no later than 28 days after the date of its order. On order of th e Court, the defendant Northwest Michigan Community Health Agency’s motion to extend tim e to file supplemental brief by 28 days is GRANTED.

s0616 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 23, 2008

Clerk
"/

q®

q®

K K

K K

K K K K

K K

K K

K K K K K

KK

K K

K K

K KK K K K

K K

K K

K K

K K

K K

K K

K

K K

K

K

K K

KK

K K

K K

K K

K K

q®

q®

K K

K

# March 2006

# March 2006

Feb 2006

#

May 2006

#

May 2006

# April 2006 # April 2006

#

May 2006

#

April 2006#

March 2006

#

March 2006

#

April 2006

#

#

May 2006

#

KK

HIRAT

FARAH

HILMAND

GHOR

NIMROZ

KANDAHAR

BADAKHSHAN

URUZGAN GHAZNI

BALKH

FARYAB

ZABUL

BADGHIS

PAKTIKA

BAGHLAN

SARI PUL

BAMYAN

TAKHAR

JAWZJAN

PARWAN

WARDAK

SAMANGAN

KUNDUZ

NURISTAN

PAKTYA

KUNAR

KABUL

NANGARHAR

KHOST

LOGAR

LAGHMAN

!. !.KAPISA

!.

!.

!. !.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!. !.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!. !.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

RAMP's Cold Storage Chain for Afghanistan

"/q®K

K

K

K

K

K

K K

K

K

#

March 2006 KABUL

!.

November 2005, RAMP GIS Unit 0 65 130 260 390 520

Kilometers ±

Refrigerated Transportation

Air Transportation

q®

8

Airport

Cold Storage Facility

(Precise Location Unknown)

8

8

8

Installed & Working

Identified & to be Installed

To be Determined

Legend

!. Provincial Centers

Main Roads

Secondary Roads

Provincial Boundaries

"/ Capital

# Proposed Installation Deadline
### part 4—fiduciary responsibility
No. 12,806.

#### Grisard, Treasurer *v.*Roselawn Cemetery Association.

(19 P. [2d] 766)

Decided February 27, 1933.

*290Mr. Thomas R. Hoeemire, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. M. G. Saunders, Mr. Edward P. Chambers, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Burke

delivered tlie opinion of the court.

Plaintiee in error is hereinafter referred to as the treasurer and defendant in error as the association.

. The association, claiming its property was exempt, brought this suit to enjoin the treasurer from selling it for taxes. A demurrer to the complaint for want of facts, jurisdiction, and necessary parties, was overruled. The treasurer answered, denying the claimed exemption and alleging- that the association had a plain, speedy and adequate remedy at law. The cause was tried to the court, which found generally for the association and entered judgment accordingly. To review that judgment this writ is prosecuted. Two questions are presented by the record: (1) Is the association’s property exempt? (2) If so, has it a remedy by injunction?

1. “* * * cemeteries not used or held for private or corporate profit, shall be exempt from taxation unless otherwise provided by general law.” Art. X, §5, Colo. Const., C. L. 1921, p. 59. It has not been so “otherwise provided.”

“The following’ classes of property shall be exempt from general taxation to wit: * * * Fifth. Cemeteries not held or conducted for private or corporate profit.” C. L. 1921, p. 1840, §7198. “All the property of such corporation, used or owned for such purpose, and all lots owned by the members thereof, shall be exempt from taxation, assessment, lien, attachment and from levy and sale upon execution, except for the purchase price thereof.” C. L. 1921, p. 792, §2435.

The association was incorporated as an organiza*291tion “not for profit.” Whether it was such in fact was an issue on the trial. The most that can be said to the contrary is that the evidence on the subject was conflicting. Under a well established rule the trial court’s finding in favor of the association is conclusive.

2. No serious contention is here made that necessary parties, were omitted. The real question raised by the demurrer, and argued here, is the remedy. It is insisted that the association was obliged to protest to the assessor, appeal to the county commissioners, and thence to the tax commission. The cases cited to support that position involved fraudulent and excessive assessments, hence need not be here discussed. Where property specifically exempt, under' Constitution and statute, is involved, and relief is sought from clouded titles and continuing assessments, equity may be invoked. In such cases the generally recognized rule supports resort to injunction. 1 High on Injunction (4th Ed.), p. 504, §530; *Fargo v. Hart,*193 U. S. 490, 24 Sup. Ct. 498, 48 L. Ed. 761. Such is the holding in this jurisdiction. *Colo. F. & L. S. Co. v. Beerbohm,*43 Colo. 464, 479, 96 Pac. 443; *Shaw v. Bond,*64 Colo. 366, 372, 171 Pac. 1142.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Moore not participating.
### [§§921 to 927. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–519, §2, Nov. 15, 2000, 114 Stat. 2423]

Section 921, added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title VIII, §801(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 985, provided for exclusion from gross income of exempt foreign trade income.

A prior section 921, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 290; Oct. 4, 1976, Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(a)(116), 90 Stat. 1784, defined Western Hemisphere trade corporation, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–455, title X, §1052(b), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1648, effective with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1979.

Section 922, added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title VIII, §801(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 986, defined FSC's.

A prior section 922, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 291; Dec. 10, 1971, Pub. L. 92–178, title V, §502(c), 85 Stat. 550; Oct. 4, 1976, Pub. L. 94–455, title X, §1052(a), (c)(1), 90 Stat. 1647, 1648; Nov. 6, 1978, Pub. L. 95–600, title III, §301(b)(15), 92 Stat. 2822, related to a special deduction for a Western Hemisphere trade corporation, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–455, title X, §1052(b), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1648, effective with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1979.

Section 923, added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title VIII, §801(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 986; amended Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1876(b)(3), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2898, related to exempt foreign trade income.

Section 924, added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title VIII, §801(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 987; amended Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1876(e)(2), (l), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2899, 2901, related to foreign trading gross receipts.

Section 925, added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title VIII, §801(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 990, related to transfer pricing rules.

Section 926, added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title VIII, §801(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 991, related to distributions to shareholders.

Section 927, added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title VIII, §801(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 991; amended Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1876(a)(1), (e)(1), (f)(1), (p)(5), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2897, 2899, 2902; Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1012(bb)(8)(A), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3536; Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11704(a)(10), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–518; Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13239(a), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 509; Pub. L. 105–34, title XI, §1171(a), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 987, related to other definitions and special rules.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to transactions after Sept. 30, 2000, with special rules relating to existing foreign sales corporations, see section 5 of Pub. L. 106–519, set out as an Effective Date of 2000 Amendments note under section 56 of this title.
<page>                                               EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey D. Hahn, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation ("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant,
certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

	  a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

  b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

  c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and



<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.




Date:  November 14, 2003    /s/ Jeffrey D. Hahn
                                Jeffrey D. Hahn
                                Chief Financial Officer,
                                Demeter Management Corporation,
                                general partner of the registrant
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.583 Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon importation. ( a ) *Basis of claim.* An importer may make a claim for CAFTA-DR preferential tariff treatment, including an exemption from the merchandise processing fee, based on: ( 1 ) A certification, as specified in § 10.584 of this subpart, that is prepared by the importer, exporter, or producer of the good; or
( 2 ) The importer's knowledge that the good qualifies as an originating good, including reasonable reliance on information in the importer's possession that the good is an originating good.
( b ) *Making a claim.* The claim is made by including on the entry summary, or equivalent documentation, the letter “P” or “P + ” as a prefix to the subheading of the HTSUS under which each qualifying good is classified, or by the method specified for equivalent reporting via an authorized electronic data interchange system.
( c ) *Corrected claim.* If, after making the claim specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the importer has reason to believe that the claim is based on inaccurate information or is otherwise invalid, the importer must, within 30 calendar days after the date of discovery of the error, correct the claim and pay any duties that may be due. The importer must submit a statement either in writing or via an authorized electronic data interchange system to the CBP office where the original claim was filed specifying the correction (*see* §§ 10.621 and 10.623 of this subpart).
[CBP Dec. 08-22, 73 FR 33678, June 13, 2008, as amended by CBP Dec. 10-26, 75 FR 50699, Aug. 17, 2010]
### §1143. Research, studies, and reports

#### (a) Authorization to undertake research and surveys

(1) The Secretary is authorized to undertake research and surveys and in connection therewith to collect, compile, analyze and publish data, information, and statistics relating to employee benefit plans, including retirement, deferred compensation, and welfare plans, and types of plans not subject to this chapter.

(2) The Secretary is authorized and directed to undertake research studies relating to pension plans, including but not limited to (A) the effects of this subchapter upon the provisions and costs of pension plans, (B) the role of private pensions in meeting the economic security needs of the Nation, and (C) the operation of private pension plans including types and levels of benefits, degree of reciprocity or portability, and financial and actuarial characteristics and practices, and methods of encouraging the growth of the private pension system.

(3) The Secretary may, as he deems appropriate or necessary, undertake other studies relating to employee benefit plans, the matters regulated by this subchapter, and the enforcement procedures provided for under this subchapter.

(4) The research, surveys, studies, and publications referred to in this subsection may be conducted directly, or indirectly through grant or contract arrangements.

#### (b) Omitted

#### (c) Cooperation with Congress

The Secretary is authorized and directed to cooperate with the Congress and its appropriate committees, subcommittees, and staff in supplying data and any other information, and personnel and services, required by the Congress in any study, examination, or report by the Congress relating to pension benefit plans established or maintained by States or their political subdivisions.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §513, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 896.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 93–406, known as the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Titles I, III, and IV of such Act are classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1001 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Subsec. (b) of this section, which required the Secretary to submit annually a report to Congress on the administration of this subchapter, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, page 123 of House Document No. 103–7.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Regulations

Secretary authorized, effective Sept. 2, 1974, to promulgate regulations wherever provisions of this subchapter call for the promulgation of regulations, see section 1031 of this title.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03672**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 03672\03672_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03672\03672_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 03672\03672_Follow-Up Questions_01.21.2011.xlsx Draft Questions for Follow Up

03672\03672_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03672\03672_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03672\03672_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03672\03672_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03672\03672_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03672\03672_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03672\Certification Statement Plant ID 03672.pdf Plant certification statement x 03672\Supplemental Documents\03672_KU-BR - WB-1 Water Balance Block Diagram - 1011r7.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03672\Supplemental Documents\03672_KU-EWBrown A5-2 - Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03672\Supplemental Documents\KU-BR - D-1 Wastewater Treatment Block Diagram - 1011r7.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03672\Supplemental Documents\KU-BR - Unit 1-2 Bottom Ash System - 1011.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03672\Supplemental Documents\KU-BR - Unit 1-2 Fly Ash System - 1011.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03672\Supplemental Documents\KU-BR - Unit 3 Bottom Ash System - 1011.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03672\Supplemental Documents\KU-BR - Unit 3 Fly Ash System - 1011.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03672\Supplemental Documents\KU-EWBrown - Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### Andrew J. Brown v. Orvill Thompson.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.