alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §871. Clerk, chief deputy clerk, assistant clerk, deputies, assistants, and other employees

The Court of International Trade may appoint a clerk, a chief deputy clerk, an assistant clerk, deputy clerks, and such deputies, assistants, and other employees as may be necessary for the effective dispatch of the business of the court, who shall be subject to removal by the court.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 925; Pub. L. 86–243, §1, Sept. 9, 1959, 73 Stat. 474; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §501(17), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1742.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 6 of title 19, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Customs Duties (May 4, 1923, ch. 251, §2, 42 Stat. 1453; Jan. 13, 1925, ch. 76, 43 Stat. 748; May 28, 1926, ch. 411, §1, 44 Stat. 669; June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §§518, 649, 46 Stat. 737, 762).

Section is based on the last two sentences of section 6 of title 19, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which provided for appointment by the Attorney General in conformity with the civil service laws. This and other administrative powers of the Department of Justice with respect to the courts were transferred to the Administrative Office of the United States Courts by section 446 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which is section 604 of this title. The revised section vests the power of appointment in the chief judge to conform with section 253 of this title and rules 5 and 22 of the Rules of the Customs Court adopted May 29, 1936.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–417 redesignated the Customs Court as the Court of International Trade.

1959—Pub. L. 86–243 included chief deputy clerk and assistant clerk in section catchline, transferred the appointing authority from the chief judge to the Customs Court, provided for appointment of a chief deputy clerk, an assistant clerk and deputy clerks and for power of removal and deleted reference to the civil service laws with respect to appointments.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980, and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.

#### Savings Provision

Pub. L. 86–243, §4, Sept. 9, 1959, 73 Stat. 474, provided that: "Nothing contained in the amendments made by this Act [enacting section 873 and amending this section and sections 253, 550, and 872 of this title] shall be construed to deprive any person serving on the date of enactment of this Act [Sept. 9, 1959] as an officer or employee of the Customs Court of any rights, privileges, or civil service status, if any, to which such person is entitled under the laws of the United States or regulations thereunder."
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-48 May 8, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC, CONNECTICUT COMPANY TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATION

INVOLVING WATCHES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

representatives of Cartier Inc. on Thursday, May 15, to discuss

an apparent violation of agency requirements at the company's

Shelton, Conn., manufacturing facility. The predecisional

enforcement conference will begin at 1 p.m. in the Division of

Nuclear Materials Safety conference room at NRC Region 1 offices

in King of Prussia, Pa.

The meeting will be open to the public for observation

only.

The apparent violation concerns the distribution of more

than 16,000 wristwatches containing small amounts of tritium, a

radioactive material, without an NRC license. The watches pose

no hazard to the public or their owners. Small amounts of

tritium are safely used in many timepieces, but the NRC requires

distributors to obtain a license from the agency to use the

material.

A decision by the NRC to hold a predecisional enforcement

conference does not mean the agency has determined a violation

has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather,

the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity

to point out any errors that may have been made in NRC inspection

reports; and to enable the licensee to outline its proposed

corrective actions.

No decisions on the apparent violation will be made at

this conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC

officials at a later time.

#
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Jesus Gonzalez, Plaintiff,

v.

Caribbean Investment America LLC, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-22639-Civ-Scola

Order Administratively Closing Case upon Notice of Settlement

The parties have notified the Court that they have settled this matter.

(ECF No. 8.) By August 31, 2020, the Plaintiff must file a notice of dismissal, 

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), or a stipulation of 

dismissal, under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The Court will administratively close this 

case in the meantime.

If the Plaintiff files a stipulation of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 

the parties wish to have this Court retain jurisdiction to enforce any settlement 

agreement, the stipulation of dismissal must include the following sentence:

“The effectiveness of this stipulation of dismissal is conditioned upon the 

Court’s entry of an order retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the 

parties’ settlement agreement.” This sentence is necessary because a 

stipulation of dismissal is otherwise self-executing and deprives the Court of 

jurisdiction to do anything further. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 

677 F.3d 1272, 1280 (11th Cir. 2012).

The Court directs the Clerk to close this case. Any party may move to 

reopen the action if there is a problem in reaching a final settlement 

agreement. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

Done and ordered at Miami, Florida, on July 30, 2020.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-22639-RNS Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/31/2020 Page 1 of 1
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-034 February 28, 2000

NRC SEEKING PUBLIC COMMENT ON DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on its draft FiscalYear 2000-

2005 Strategic Plan which provides a blueprint for the agency to plan, implement, and monitor work

needed to achieve its goals.

The draft plan, which has not yet been approved by the five-member Commission, describes

the agency’s strategic goals, performance goals, and strategies for achieving NRC’s mission. It is

organized into four strategic arenas: 1) Nuclear Reactor Safety; 2) Nuclear Materials Safety; 3) Nuclear

Waste Safety; and 4) International Nuclear Safety Support. To help accomplish agency goals, NRC

has established overarching corporate management strategies which are also described in the draft plan.

A summary is provided in Volume 1 with more details, required by the Government Performance and

Results Act, provided in Volume 2.

Embodied in the plan is the agency’s understanding that decisions must be based first and

foremost on their contributions to public health and safety. In addition, the NRC must also consider

the effect of its decisions on the public it protects, on the industries it regulates, and on the

effectiveness and efficiency of internal NRC operations.

The NRC issued its first Strategic Plan in September 1997 and is required to update it every

three years. The current plan is based more on performance and the outcomes the agency intends to

achieve. It addresses concerns and comments raised in Congressional hearings as well as in meetings

with members of the public and stakeholders who would be most affected by NRC decisions. Also, it

captures recent regulatory reforms and their outcomes in the long term.

Additional details will be available in an upcoming edition of the Federal Register. The draft

strategic plan and a forum for submitting comments electronically will be available at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/planning.html on NRC’s web site.

All written comments should be submitted by April 7, 2000, to Daryl Kade at the U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop: T-9D25, Washington, D.C., 20555-0001.

###
### §167. Short title of subchapter

This subchapter may be cited as the "National Labor Relations Act".

(July 5, 1935, ch. 372, §17, as added June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title I, §101, 61 Stat. 152.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For effective date of amendment by act June 23, 1947, see section 104 of act June 23, 1947, set out as a note under section 151 of this title.
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 9:20 AM

To: 'ebrown@lifedrone.co'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Request for additional information: LifeDrone, LLC (FAA-2015-1368)

June 16, 2015 

Dear Mr. Brown: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-1368). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including 

payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s). 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by June 30, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
# Power Reactor

&"Arial,Bold"Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Power Reactors Fee Class	

&D		Page &P of &N

# Spent Fuel Storage&Reactor Dec.

&"Arial,Bold"Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning Fee Class	

&D		Page &P of &N

# NPUF

&"Arial,Bold"Mission Direct Budgeted Resources forNon-Power Production or Utilization Facilities Fee Class&"Arial,Regular" 	

&D		Page &P of &N

# Fuel Facility

&"Arial,Bold"Mission Direct Budgeted Resources forFuel Facilities Fee Class &"Arial,Regular"	

&D		Page &P of &N

# Materials

&"Arial,Bold"Mission Direct Budgeted Resources for Materials Fee Class	

&D		Page &P of &N

# Transportation

&"Arial,Bold"Mission Direct Budgeted Resources for Transportation Fee Class	

&D		Page &P of &N

# Rare

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources for Rare Earth Fee Class	

# Uranium Recovery

&"Arial,Bold"Mission Direct Budgeted Resources forUranium Recovery Fee Class	

&D		Page &P of &N

# Import-Export

&"Arial,Bold"Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated toImport-Export Fee Class	

&D		Page &P of &N

# Generic LLW

&"Arial,Bold"Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated toGeneric Low Level Waste Surcharge Category	

&D		Page &P of &N

# Corp

Agency Support (Corporate Support and the IG): Budgeted Resources for Professional Hourly Rate Calculation	

# Program

Mission Program Indirect Budgeted Resources for Professional Hourly Rate Calculation
### §507A. Assistant Attorney General for National Security

(a) Of the Assistant Attorneys General appointed under section 506, one shall serve, upon the designation of the President, as the Assistant Attorney General for National Security.

(b) The Assistant Attorney General for National Security shall—

(1) serve as the head of the National Security Division of the Department of Justice under section 509A of this title;

(2) serve as primary liaison to the Director of National Intelligence for the Department of Justice; and

(3) perform such other duties as the Attorney General may prescribe.

(Added Pub. L. 109–177, title V, §506(a)(1), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 247.)
458 P.2d 231

#### LONE MOUNTAIN CATTLE CO., Inc., Glen A. Lloyd, Marian M. Lloyd, Petitioners, v. The Honorable William R. HENDLEY, District Judge of the First Judicial District Sitting by Designation, Respondent.

No. 8898.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Aug. 14, 1969.

. Ordered that petition for alternative writ •of prohibition and mandamus be and the same is hereby denied.
(October 29, 1943.)

#### George C. Gilsey, Appellant, v. Ernest Francis, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
### §169. Employees with religious convictions; payment of dues and fees

Any employee who is a member of and adheres to established and traditional tenets or teachings of a bona fide religion, body, or sect which has historically held conscientious objections to joining or financially supporting labor organizations shall not be required to join or financially support any labor organization as a condition of employment; except that such employee may be required in a contract between such employees' employer and a labor organization in lieu of periodic dues and initiation fees, to pay sums equal to such dues and initiation fees to a nonreligious, nonlabor organization charitable fund exempt from taxation under section 501(c)(3) of title 26, chosen by such employee from a list of at least three such funds, designated in such contract or if the contract fails to designate such funds, then to any such fund chosen by the employee. If such employee who holds conscientious objections pursuant to this section requests the labor organization to use the grievance-arbitration procedure on the employee's behalf, the labor organization is authorized to charge the employee for the reasonable cost of using such procedure.

(July 5, 1935, ch. 372, §19, as added Pub. L. 93–360, §3, July 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 397; amended Pub. L. 96–593, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3452.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–593 inserted reference to nonlabor organization and provisions respecting charges to employee for use of grievance-arbitration procedure, and struck out applicability of provisions to employees of health care institutions only.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 93–360, §4, July 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 397, provided that: "The amendments made by this Act [enacting this section and section 183 of this title and amending sections 152 and 158 of this title] shall become effective on the thirtieth day after its date of enactment [July 26, 1974]."
#### Edgar A. Reincke, Respondent, v. The Texas Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
No: 23-009 February 14, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Announces Additional Public Meeting, New Comment Deadline

for Environmental Review of Comanche Peak License Renewal Application

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold an additional public meeting Feb. 23 to 

discuss the environmental review process for an application to renew the operating licenses of 

the Comanche Peak Nuclear Generating Station near Glen Rose, Texas.

Comanche Peak Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, are pressurized-water 

reactors located approximately 40 miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. Unit 1 is currently 

licensed to operate through Feb. 8, 2030, and Unit 2 through Feb. 2, 2033. 

The operator, Vistra Operations Company, submitted the application Oct. 3 to extend the 

licenses for an additional 20 years. The NRC staff has determined the application contains 

sufficient information for the agency to formally docket the application and begin its safety and 

environmental reviews. Docketing the application does not preclude requesting additional 

information as the reviews proceed, and it does not indicate whether the NRC will renew the 

license.

NRC staff members will conduct a public meeting Feb. 23 from 7-9 p.m. Central time at 

the Somervell County Expo Center, 202 Bo Gibbs Blvd., W Hwy 67 in Glen Rose. The staff will 

describe the environmental review process and accept comments from the public regarding the 

potential scope of that review. An open house will be held from 6-7 p.m. Central time for 

informal discussions. 

The scoping meeting, as outlined in a Federal Register notice to be published soon, is one 

method for filing comments on the environmental review before the March 13 deadline. 

Comments can also be submitted via regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC-2022-0183, via 

email to ComanchePeakEIS@nrc.gov , or via U.S. Mail to Office of Administration, Mail Stop 

TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. 

The Comanche Peak license renewal application is available on the NRC website, and at 

the Somervell County Library, 108 Allen Dr. in Glen Rose; and the Hood County Library, 222 N 

Travis St. in Granbury, Texas.
#### Mart Perry, Respondent, v. Hart’s Food Stores, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order reversed on the law and facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, on the ground that in denying the motion the Special Term abused its discretion. All concur. (The order denies a motion by defendants for dismissal of plaintiff's complaint for laches in an action for damages for malicious prosecution and false arrest.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1056.]
Exhibit A 

Case 1:20-cv-21839-RAR Document 15-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2020 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:20-cv-21839-RAR Document 15-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2020 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:20-cv-21839-RAR Document 15-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2020 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:20-cv-21839-RAR Document 15-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2020 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:20-cv-21839-RAR Document 15-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2020 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:20-cv-21839-RAR Document 15-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2020 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:20-cv-21839-RAR Document 15-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2020 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:20-cv-21839-RAR Document 15-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2020 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:20-cv-21839-RAR Document 15-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2020 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:20-cv-21839-RAR Document 15-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2020 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:20-cv-21839-RAR Document 15-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2020 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:20-cv-21839-RAR Document 15-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2020 Page 12 of 12
### §3012. Joinder of additional defendant

The United States or the debtor may join as an additional defendant in an action or proceeding under this chapter any person reasonably believed to owe money (including money owed on account of a requirement to provide goods or services pursuant to a loan or loan guarantee extended under Federal law) to the debtor arising out of the transaction or occurrence giving rise to a debt.

(Added Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVI, §3611, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4938.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Nov. 29, 1990, and applicable with respect to certain actions for debts owed the United States pending in court on that effective date, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101–647, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                   3,406,291
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            7,075,116
<ALLOWANCES>                             1,044,000
<INVENTORY>                                 88,417
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        11,244,653
<PP&E>                                   8,879,755
<DEPRECIATION>                           7,332,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          13,329,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    8,696,533
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   106,956
<OTHER-SE>                               2,145,115
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            13,329,515
<SALES>                                 16,210,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        22,979,628
<CGS>                                    4,893,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            4,893,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        15,941,280
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          60,355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          2,270,919
<INCOME-TAX>                                50,673
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      2,220,246
<DISCONTINUED>                          (9,850,623)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (7,630,377)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.740)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.690)


</TABLE>
#### Isaac Saltz, Respondent, v. Surface Transportation Corporation of New York, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.