alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Training Grant Applications Subcommittee Meeting.                    

*Date:*                         November 8, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn Select Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kishena C. Wadhwani, PhD, MPH, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, 9000 Rockville Pike, MSC 7510, 6100 Building, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-7510, (301) 496-1485,                         *wadhwank@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 12, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-23342  Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### Part E—General
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-02T04:03:34-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### Harry W. Lauter, Respondent, v. Harold Litton Company, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Raymond A. Donovan, Appellant, against Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association of the City of New York et al., Respondents.

*709Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1049.]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-10 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, January 21, 1999)

NRC REQUESTS INFORMATION FROM NUCLEAR POWER PLANT LICENSEES

ABOUT OVERALL YEAR 2000 READINESS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has requested all utilities operating nuclear power

plants to inform NRC of steps they are taking to ensure their power plants will be able to

function after January 1, 2000, to maintain stability of the national electric power grid.

The request for information is broader in scope than previous requests for information.

The new request includes systems necessary for continued plant operation which are not

covered by the terms and conditions of the plant’s license and NRC regulations. Consequently,

this information does not require submittal under oath or affirmation. Utilities have a choice

whether they report by July 1 on their plants’ Y2K readiness for systems within their license and

NRC regulations or all those systems required for continued operation.

The “Year 2000" or Y2K problem refers to computers’ potential inability to recognize

dates beginning with January 1, 2000, and beyond. It is caused by computer programs that use

two-digit numbers to represent a calendar year (such as “98" for 1998). If the problem is not

corrected, vulnerable computer systems will read “00" as 1900, rather than 2000, possibly

causing some systems or equipment to malfunction.

Earlier this year, NRC notified all utilities to provide detailed information on steps they

are taking to deal with the Year 2000 computer problem in order to ensure that key computer

systems will continue to function properly after January 1, 2000. Since that time, however,

increased public awareness and government attention to the Year 2000 problem have resulted

in concern over not only public health and safety of nuclear power plants, but also over their

ability to continue to provide power.

In September, the NRC started conducting Year 2000 audits at 12 nuclear power plants.

These audits, which will be completed by the end of this month, evaluate the effectiveness of

measures licensees are taking to identify and correct Y2K problems at their facilities. Audit

results will be used to determine if NRC needs to take further regulatory action and will be

made available on the NRC web page as they are issued. Results of the first six audits have

been posted.

The text of the letter sent to all utilities operating nuclear power plants will be posted on

the NRC Internet web page at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/NEWS/year2000. This site has

additional information relating to steps NRC is taking to deal with the Year 2000 problem.
##
#### Paul Timen, Respondent, v. James A. McCreery & Company, a Domestic Corporation, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2417

JOHN PAUL TURNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District 

Judge. (7:10-cv-00555-sgw-mfu)

Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: March 9, 2011

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing this action petitioning for a writ of coram nobis. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Turner v. Virginia, No. 7:10-cv-00555-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va. 

Dec. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 41.140 Dissemination of policy. ( a ) *Notification of policy.* ( 1 ) Each recipient shall implement specific and continuing steps to notify applicants for admission and employment, students and parents of elementary and secondary school students, employees, sources of referral of applicants for admission and employment, and all unions or professional organizations holding collective bargaining or professional agreements with the recipient, that it does not discriminate on the basis of sex in the educational programs or activities that it operates, and that it is required by Title IX and these Title IX regulations not to discriminate in such a manner. Such notification shall contain such information, and be made in such manner, as the designated agency official finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by Title IX and these Title IX regulations, but shall state at least that the requirement not to discriminate in education programs or activities extends to employment therein, and to admission thereto unless §§ 41.300 through 41.310 do not apply to the recipient, and that inquiries concerning the application of Title IX and these Title IX regulations to such recipient may be referred to the employee designated pursuant to § 41.135, or to the designated agency official.
( 2 ) Each recipient shall make the initial notification required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section within 90 days of September 29, 2000 or of the date these Title IX regulations first apply to such recipient, whichever comes later, which notification shall include publication in: ( i ) Newspapers and magazines operated by such recipient or by student, alumnae, or alumni groups for or in connection with such recipient; and
( ii ) Memoranda or other written communications distributed to every student and employee of such recipient.
( b ) *Publications.* ( 1 ) Each recipient shall prominently include a statement of the policy described in paragraph (a) of this section in each announcement, bulletin, catalog, or application form that it makes available to any person of a type, described in paragraph (a) of this section, or which is otherwise used in connection with the recruitment of students or employees.
( 2 ) A recipient shall not use or distribute a publication of the type described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section that suggests, by text or illustration, that such recipient treats applicants, students, or employees differently on the basis of sex except as such treatment is permitted by these Title IX regulations.
( c ) *Distribution.* Each recipient shall distribute without discrimination on the basis of sex each publication described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, and shall apprise each of its admission and employment recruitment representatives of the policy of nondiscrimination described in paragraph (a) of this section, and shall require such representatives to adhere to such policy.
### §104d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 104d was editorially reclassified as section 4702 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—FEDERALLY ADMINISTERED PROGRAMS
§ 142.21 How will the hearing be conducted and who has the burden of proof? ( a ) The ALJ conducts a hearing in order to determine whether a defendant is liable for a civil penalty, assessment, or both and, if so, the appropriate amount of the civil penalty and/or assessment. The hearing will be recorded and transcribed, and the transcript of testimony, exhibits admitted at the hearing, and all papers and requests filed in the proceeding constitute the record for a decision by the ALJ.
( b ) SBA must prove a defendant's liability and any aggravating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( c ) A defendant must prove any affirmative defenses and any mitigating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( d ) The hearing will be open to the public unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ for good cause shown.
§ 6.51 Review of requests to amend records. ( a ) The system manager shall acknowledge the receipt of a request to amend a record within 10 workdays. If possible, the acknowledgment shall include the system manager's determination either to amend the record or to deny the request to amend as provided in § 6.53.
( b ) When reviewing a record in response to a request to amend, the system manager shall assess the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness of the existing record in light of the proposed amendment and shall determine whether the request for the amendment is justified. With respect to a request to delete information, the system manager also shall review the request and the existing record to determine whether the information is relevant and necessary to accomplish an agency purpose required to be accomplished by statute or Executive Order.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6613

JULIAN E. ROCHESTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the

State of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-98-146-2-21AJ)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julian E. Rochester, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Rochester v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-98-146-2-

21AJ (D.S.C. Apr. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process. The motions for preparation of a transcript at government

expense and for correction of facts in PLRA are denied.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.66 Articles exported for temporary exhibition and returned; horses exported for horse racing and returned; procedure on entry. ( a ) In connection with the entry of articles, including livestock or other animals, exported for temporary exhibition and returned and claimed to be exempt from duty under subheading 9801.00.50 or 9801.00.60, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), there shall be filed: ( 1 ) A certificate of exportation on Customs Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent;
( 2 ) A declaration of the importer on Customs Form 4455, or its electronic equivalent, for articles of either domestic or foreign origin; and
( 3 ) In the case of animals of foreign origin taken abroad for exhibition in connection with a circus or menagerie, a copy of an inventory of these animals filed prior to their leaving the country with the director of the port of their departure.
( b ) If it is shown to be impracticable to produce the certificate of exportation required under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the port director may accept other satisfactory evidence of exportation, or may take a bond on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter to secure the production of such certificate or other evidence.
( c ) Articles claimed to be exempt from duty under subheading 9801.00.50 or 9801.00.60, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) (19 U.S.C. 1202), may be returned free of duty without formal entry and without regard to the requirements of paragraph (a) or (b) of this section if: ( 1 ) Prior to the exportation of such articles, an application on Customs Form 4455, or its electronic equivalent, (accompanied by an appropriate inventory, when required by law or by the port director) is filed with a declaration thereon that: ( i ) Any right to drawback of Customs duties with respect to that shipment was waived;
( ii ) Any internal revenue tax due has been paid and no refund thereof will be sought; and
( iii ) The merchandise was identified, registered, and exported in accordance with the regulations set forth in §§ 10.8(e), (g), (h), and (i), governing the exportation of articles sent abroad for repairs, and
( 2 ) Upon return, a duplicate Customs Form 4455, or its electronic equivalent, (with accompanying inventory where one was required) is filed.
[28 FR 14663, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 74-242, 39 FR 33794, Sept. 20, 1974; T.D. 75-235, 40 FR 44319, Sept. 26, 1975; T.D. 78-153, 43 FR 23709, June 1, 1978; T.D. 82-224, 47 FR 53727, Nov. 29, 1982; T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41166, Oct. 19, 1984; T.D. 87-75, 52 FR 20066, May 29, 1987; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51250, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 94-1, 58 FR 69470, Dec. 30, 1993; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61284, Oct. 13, 2015]
### **Subchapter F—Special Provisions Applicable to Manufacturers Tax**

Sec.
4216.
Definition of price.
4217.
Leases.
4218.
Use by manufacturer or importer considered sale.
4219.
Application of tax in case of sales by other than manufacturer or importer.
[4220 to 4225. Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1958**—Pub. L. 85–859, title I, §§117(d), 119(b)(3), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1281, 1286, substituted "Leases" for "Lease considered sale" in item 4217, and struck out items 4220 to 4225.

**1956**—Act June 29, 1956, ch. 462, title II, §207(b), 70 Stat. 392, added item 4226 and redesignated former item 4226 as 4227.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                          7,613
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,736
<CGS>                                           16,112
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                66,512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,497
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,242
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,153
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,089
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,089
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 4700.0-2 Objectives.

The objectives of these regulations are management of wild horses and burros as an integral part of the natural system of the public lands under the principle of multiple use; protection of wild horses and burros from unauthorized capture, branding, harassment or death; and humane care and treatment of wild horses and burros.
#### In the Matter of Henry C. Valentine.

Application granted. Present— Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 321.2 Selection of the mobilization base. ( a ) The Department of Defense shall select, for its mobilization base, facilities which produce or are capable of producing critically important military items or components (military class A components used entirely in the production, maintenance, or repair of military items) which meet one of the following: ( 1 ) Those items which would be so urgent to the defense of this country that utmost effort must be exerted to produce them even in case of general war involving severe damage to the facilities necessary to produce these items and the components thereof.
( 2 ) Those items essential to survival and retaliation, maintenance of health, or combat efficiency required to support peripheral war and which meet one or more of the following criteria: ( i ) Items requiring a long lead-time or long manufacturing cycle.
( ii ) Items currently not in production or which are required in quantities far in excess of peacetime production.
( iii ) Items requiring the conversion of an industry or a number of plants within an industry.
( iv ) Items requiring materials or manufacturing processes essentially different from those in current use.
( v ) Items for which industry does not have production experience. Paragraph (a)(2) of this section is inclusive of the Department of Defense Preferential Planning List of End Items.
( b ) In selecting facilities for the Department of Defense mobilization base, consideration shall be given to their vulnerability to nuclear attack, with particular attention to the possibility of ( 1 ) minimizing vulnerability of facilities producing “urgent” items under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, including the need for dispersal, protective construction, and special security measures to safeguard against sabotage of clandestine attack, and
( 2 ) reducing concentration of uncommon critical production facilities so that a productive segment of each critical industry would be likely to survive a nuclear attack.
( c ) The Department of Energy and the Maritime Administration, in cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, shall determine the items and facilities which meet the above criteria for their respective programs for maintaining the mobilization base.
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2
                               THIRD AMENDMENT TO

              STERICYCLE, INC. 2000 NONSTATUTORY STOCK OPTION PLAN



         The Stericycle, Inc. 2000 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (the "Plan")
is amended as follows pursuant to the authority of the Board of Directors of
Stericycle, Inc. under Paragraph 10.2 of the Plan:

         1.     PARAGRAPH 4.1

         Paragraph 4.1 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

                4.1   MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES

                      The maximum total number of shares of Common Stock for
                which Options may be granted under this Plan is 1,750,000 shares
                (subject to adjustment as provided in Paragraph 10.1).

         2.     EFFECTIVE DATE

         This Amendment shall be effective as of February 5, 2002.