alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In  connection  with the  annual  report  of  MedSolutions,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2004,  as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),
Matthew  H.  Fleeger,  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,  hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,
         in all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of
         operations of the Company.



                                            /s/  MATTHEW H. FLEEGER
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Matthew H. Fleeger
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Date:  April 15, 2005
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-18 February 21, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE WITH CERAC, INC. ON

ON APPARENT VIOLATIONS OF NRC SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet February 26 with

representatives of CERAC, Inc., Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for a predecisional

enforcement conference on apparent radiation safety program violations.

The meeting will be at 1:00 p.m. in the Third Floor Conference Room of

the NRC Region III Office, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois. The meeting

is open to public observation.

The meeting will focus on the company's overall failure to properly

implement its radiation safety program and conduct proper safety evaluations.

The company operates a thorium reprocessing and uranium repackaging facility

in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

The company discharges water containing low levels of naturally

occurring radioactive material to the sanitary sewer system as permitted under

strict NRC limits. An NRC inspection conducted last December through January

found that the company for two years did not determine, as required, the

concentration and solubility of radioactive material discharged into the sewer

system. In response to NRC's inspection findings, the company has stopped

discharging the water until the required analysis is completed.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean the NRC has

determined that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be

taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes

and safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out

any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable

the company to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decisions on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement

action, such as a fine, will be made at this conference. Those decisions will

be made by senior NRC officials at a later date.

####
**Exhibit 32.2**

STATEMENTOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Paul R. Kimmel, certifythat:

1.  The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the yearended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) of MediCor Ltd. (the “Company”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

Date:September 28, 2006
|        | /s/ Paul R. Kimmel      |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Paul R. Kimmel          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the
Annual Report of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2014,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guy Bernstein, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  June 30, 2015 | /s/ Guy Bernstein      
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | Guy Bernstein          
|                     | Chief Executive Officer
DATE DRONE INFORMATION

COMMENTS 

### REFERENCE KEY CR CALIBRATION REQUIRED HZ HAZARD PP PEOPLE AND PROPERTY AT AIR TRAFFIC MI MECHANICAL ISSUE TI TECHNICAL ISSUE PIC PILOT IN COMMAND FLIGHT INFORMATION IN OUT TOTAL OPERATIONAL ISSUES REMARKS & COMMENTS PILOT TIME FLIGHT CONDITIONS FLIGHT NO.

TOTAL HOURS THIS PAGE TOTAL FORWARDED TOTAL TO DATEI CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING ENTRIES ARE TRUE AND CORRECT:BY: _____________________________ DATE: _______________________________________ 

## HOEGGER COMMUNICATIONS PILOT LOG

Date: 5.15.2015 Revision: Original
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-98-63 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Monday, November 30, 1998)

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have announced the

assignment of Charles Patterson as the new Senior Resident Inspector at the Turkey

Point Nuclear Plant in Homestead, Florida.

Before being assigned to Turkey Point, Patterson worked as the senior resident

inspector for four and a half years at Carolina Power and Light’s Brunswick Nuclear

Station in Southport, North Carolina. Before his Brunswick assignment, he spent the

first 10 years of his NRC career as a resident inspector at the Browns Ferry nuclear

plant in Alabama, project engineer in the Atlanta regional office, and returned to Browns

Ferry as the restart coordinator/senior resident inspector. Patterson joined the NRC in

1983 after 11 years experience with Alabama Power at the Farley Nuclear Plant,

Westinghouse - Bettis at the Naval Reactors Facility and U. S. Navy nuclear submarine

program. He has a B.S. Degree in Engineering from Idaho State University and a

Masters Degree in Administrative Science from the University of Alabama in Huntsville.

He is a Professional Engineer in the State of Alabama.

Patterson joins NRC Resident Inspector Rogerio Reyes, and Site Secretary

Laura Orr at the Turkey Point plant. The NRC inspectors at Turkey Point can be

reached at 305-245-7669.

###
§ 208.7 Enforcement. ( a ) *Remedies for noncompliance.* In accordance with the provisions of 2 CFR 200.338, 200.341, and 200.342, if a Sponsoring Agency, Participating Agency, Affiliated Personnel or other System Member materially fails to comply with a term of a Cooperative Agreement, Memorandum of Agreement, System directive or other Program Directive, the Assistant Administrator may take one or more of the actions provided in 2 CFR 200.338(a)-(f). Any such enforcement action taken by the Assistant Administrator will be subject to the hearings, appeals, and effects of suspension and termination provisions of 2 CFR 200.341 and 200.342.
( b ) The enforcement remedies identified in this section, including suspension and termination, do not preclude a Sponsoring Agency, Participating Agency, Affiliated Personnel or other System Member from being subject to “Debarment and Suspension” under E.O. 12549, as amended, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.338(d).
( c ) *Other authority for sanctions.* Nothing in this section limits or precludes the application of other authority to impose civil or criminal sanctions, including 42 U.S.C. 5156.
[70 FR 9194, Feb. 24, 2005, as amended at 79 FR 76087, Dec. 19, 2014]
|   | 1. | I      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K      containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods      included in the year covered by this annual report, of Trust Certificates      (TRUCs), Series 2001-2 Trust; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based      on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does      not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a      material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the      circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of      the last day of the period covered by this annual  report; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | Based      on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be      provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing,      or similar, agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these      reports; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | I      am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and      the trustee under the trust agreement and based upon my knowledge and the      annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as      disclosed in the reports, the depositor and the trustee have each      fulfilled its obligations under thatagreement. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:  /s/ Craig Overlander        Name:   Craig      OverlanderTitle:   Chief      Executive Officer/President,Bear      Stearns Depositor Inc.Date:     March      28, 2008 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
### SUBCHAPTER IV—POLICY COMMITTEES AND CONFERENCES
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.453 Treatment of textile and apparel sets.

Notwithstanding the specific rules specified in General Note 26(n), HTSUS, textile and apparel goods classifiable as goods put up in sets for retail sale as provided for in General Rule of Interpretation 3, HTSUS, will not be regarded as originating goods unless each of the goods in the set is an originating good or the non-originating goods in the set do not exceed 10 percent of the adjusted value of the set.
§ 70.3 Right to submit technical information. ( a ) Any owner or lessee of property (applicant) who believes his property has been inadvertently included in a designated A, AO, A1-30, AE, AH, A99, AR, AR/A1-30, AR/AE, AR/AO, AR/AH, AR/A, VO, V1-30, VE, and V Zones on a FHBM or a FIRM, may submit scientific or technical information to the Federal Insurance Administrator for the Federal Insurance Administrator's review.
( b ) Scientific and technical information for the purpose of this part may include, but is not limited to the following: ( 1 ) An actual copy of the recorded plat map bearing the seal of the appropriate recordation official (e.g. County Clerk, or Recorder of Deeds) indicating the official recordation and proper citation (Deed or Plat Book Volume and Page Numbers), or an equivalent identification where annotation of the deed or plat book is not the practice.
( 2 ) A topographical map showing ( i ) ground elevation contours in relation to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NVGD) of 1929,
( ii ) the total area of the property in question,
( iii ) the location of the structure or structures located on the property in question,
( iv ) the elevation of the lowest adjacent grade to a structure or structures and
( v ) an indication of the curvilinear line which represents the area subject to inundation by a base flood. The curvilinear line should be based upon information provided by any appropriate authoritative source, such as a Federal Agency, the appropriate state agency (e.g. Department of Water Resources), a County Water Control District, a County or City Engineer, a Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study, or a determination by a Registered Professional Engineer;
( 3 ) A copy of the FHBM or FIRM indicating the location of the property in question;
( 4 ) A certification by a Registered Professional Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor that the lowest grade adjacent to the structure is above the base flood elevation.
[41 FR 46991, Oct. 26, 1976. Redesignated at 44 FR 31177, May 31, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 44544 and 44553, Sept. 29, 1983; 49 FR 4751, Feb. 8, 1984; 50 FR 36028, Sept. 4, 1985; 51 FR 30317, Aug. 25, 1986; 53 FR 16280, May 6, 1988; 59 FR 53601, Oct. 25, 1994; 62 FR 55719, Oct. 27, 1997]
§ 9.18 Responsibilities. ( a ) *Regional Administrators' responsibilities.* Regional Administrators shall, for all actions falling within their respective jurisdictions: ( 1 ) Implement the requirements of the Orders and this part. Under §§ 9.2 and 9.6 through 9.13 and 9.15 where a direction is given to the Agency, it is the responsibility of the Regional Administrator.
( 2 ) Consult with the Chief Counsel regarding any question of interpretation concerning this regulation or the Orders.
( b ) The Heads of the Offices, Directorates and Administrations of FEMA shall: ( 1 ) Implement the requirements of the Orders and this regulation. When a decision of a Regional Administrator relating to disaster assistance is appealed, FEMA Resilience may make determinations under this part on behalf of the Agency.
( 2 ) Prepare and submit to the Office of Chief Counsel reports to the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with section 2(b) of Executive Order 11988, as amended, and section 3 of Executive Order 11990. If a proposed action is to be located in a floodplain or wetland, any requests to the Office of Management and Budget for new authorizations or appropriations shall be accompanied by a report indicating whether the proposed action is in accord with the Orders and these regulations.
[45 FR 59526, Sept. 9, 1980, as amended at 49 FR 33879, Aug. 27, 1984; 74 FR 15336, Apr. 3, 2009; 89 FR 57046, July 11, 2024]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-cv-81091-SINGHAL/Matthewman

NELSON FERNANDEZ, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

BOSE CORPORATION, 

a foreign for-profit corporation,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ, by and through his undersigned Counsel, hereby 

provides notice that the parties have reached a settlement and will be executing necessary 

paperwork resolving all claims and matters in the case. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request 

that the Court stay all further proceedings to allow the parties to finalize the settlement agreement

and file a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice.

DATED: August 20, 2020.

Respectfully submitted, 

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO

Counsel for Plaintiff DURAN, P.A.

8751 W. Broward Blvd., Suite 303 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

Plantation, FL 33324 4640 N.W. 7th Street

T. 954/362-3800 Miami, FL 33126-2309

954/362-3779 (Facsimile) T. 305/266-9780 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com 305/269-8311 (Facsimile)

Email: pduran@pelayoduran.com

By____s/ Roderick V. Hannah __ By ___s/ Pelayo M. Duran ______

RODERICK V. HANNAH PELAYO M. DURAN

Fla. Bar No. 435384 Fla. Bar No. 0146595 

Case 9:20-cv-81091-AHS Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/20/2020 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diametrics Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for
the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Bruce Comer III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ W. Bruce Comer IIIW. Bruce Comer III Chief Executive Officer December 28, 2006


A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITEDSTATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 April 16, 2008 James Goldstene, Executive Officer CaliforniaAir Resources Board 1001 I Street Sacramento, CA 95812
RE: Adequacy Status of Coachella Valley 8-hour Ozone Early Progress Plan Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets
Dear Mr. Goldstene:
Wehave found adequate for transportation conformity purposes the motor vehicle emissionsbudgets (MVEBs) in the Coachella Valley 8-hour Ozone Early Progress Plan (February 2008). As a result of our adequacy findings,the Southern California Association of Governments and the U.S. Department of Transportation must use these budgets in future conformity analyses once the finding becomes effective.
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) submitted the draft Coachella Valley 8-hour Ozone Early Progress Plan to EPA for parallel processing on February 6, 2008 as a revision to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The plan identifies regional MVEBs for the nonattinment area for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) for the year 201 2. We announced receipt of the plan on EPA's website on February 14,2008, and requested public comment by March 17,2008. We did not receive any comments on the budgets and plan during that comment period. CARB formally adopted the plan without amendment on February 28,2008, and submitted the final version to EPA on March 24, 2008.
This letter transmits our decision that the motor vehicle emissions budgets contained in the Coachella Valley 8-hour Ozone Early Progress Plan are adequate for transportation conformity decisions. The plan identifies regional motor vehicle emission budgets in the table below:



### I The plan uses a comparable Stateterm, reactive organic gases (ROC). 

### 1 Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets 

# I Budget Year

We have detailed our adequacy findings in the enclosure. Consistent with the 2004 final amendments to the Transportation Conformity Rule (69 FR 4004) these 8-hour VOC1(tons per day) NOx (tonsper day)We have detailed our adequacy findingsin the enclosure. Consistent with the 2004 final amendmentsto the Transportation Conformity Rule (69 FR 4004) these 8-hour motor vehicle emissionsbudgets replace the existing 1-hour'ozonemotor vehicle emission budgets fromthe 2004 Attainment Plan. A copy of this letter and its enclosures will soonbe posted on the Internet at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/trmsconadequacy.htm. We will also announce the adequacy findingsin the Federal Register. The findingswill become effective 15 days after the Federal Register announcement. If you have any questions regardingthese adequacy findings, please contact Matt Haber at (415) 947-4154 or Rebecca Rosen at (415) 947-4152.

Deborah ~ordh Director,Air Division Enclosure

cc: Hasan Ikhrata, SCAG Jonathan Nadler, SCAG Jean Mazur, FHWA
458 P.2d 606

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry Bob MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 336.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Aug. 29, 1969.

William J. Heck, Hobbs, for appellant.

James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, Ethan K. Stevens, Asst. Átty. Gen., for appellee.

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Defendant was charged in two counts with burglary and forgery. Section 40A-16-3 and 40A-16-9, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 6). Pie waived preliminary hearing, and when arraigned before the District Court he pleaded guilty. He did not have counsel at these proceedings. He moved for post-conviction relief under § 21-1-1 (93), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Supp. 1967). His motion claims that at the time of the pro*532ceedings he was an indigent, that the District Court failed to provide him with counsel and that he did not intelligently waive counsel. The trial court denied the motion without a hearing. Defendant’s appeal raises the same issues presented in the motion.

Both the Justice of the Peace and the District Court advised defendant that, if indigent, counsel would be appointed to represent him. Defendant affirmatively waived counsel in both courts. The District Court questioned defendant extensively as to his understanding of the charges, the penalties if convicted, his various rights including the right to counsel, to a jury trial and to an appeal if found guilty. The court made sure that defendant’s waiver of counsel was valid and predicated upon a meaningful decision of the accused. The record shows that defendant intelligently waived counsel. State v. Sexton, *78*N.M. 694, 437 P.2d 155 (Ct.App.1968).

Further, opposed to the affirmative showing in the record of a valid and intelligent waiver, defendant advances no basis for his claim that his waiver was not made intelligently and competently. State v. Sexton, supra.

The order denying relief is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

SPIESS, C. J., and OMAN, J., concur.