alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                    This  schedule   contains  summary   financial   information
                    extracted from the Balance  Sheet,  Statements of Operations
                    and  Statements  of  Cash  Flows,  and is  qualified  in its
                    entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000895464
<NAME>                        Magna-Lab Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                       1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.000
<CASH>                                           248,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 248,000
<PP&E>                                            17,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   792,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   265,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            684,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          20,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      (439,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     265,000
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    303,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (290,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (290,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (290,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Omar GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-10247.

D.C. No. CR-01-00110-EHC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002.

Decided May 24, 2002.

*628Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Omar Garcia-Rodriguez appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Garica-Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating there are no arguable issues for review and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record. Garcia-Rodriguez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

As part of the plea agreement, Garcia-Rodriguez waived the right to appeal his sentence and conviction. Having independently reviewed the record, we are satisfied that the plea agreement, including the waiver of the right to appeal, was entered knowingly and voluntarily. *United States v. Aguilar-Muniz,*156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998). We therefore enforce the waiver, grant the motion to withdraw, and dismiss the appeal.

DISMISSED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 24, 2009

d0217 

# Order

February 24, 2009

137804

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137804 COA: 287617 Wayne CC: 07-012277-01-FC KENT DOUGLAS WELLS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 8, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY , J., not participating. Justice Ha thaway recuses herself and will not participate in this case as sh e was the presiding trial court judge. See MCR 2.003(B).
### §1609. Identification of clients and covered officials

#### (a) Oral lobbying contacts

Any person or entity that makes an oral lobbying contact with a covered legislative branch official or a covered executive branch official shall, on the request of the official at the time of the lobbying contact—

(1) state whether the person or entity is registered under this chapter and identify the client on whose behalf the lobbying contact is made; and

(2) state whether such client is a foreign entity and identify any foreign entity required to be disclosed under section 1603(b)(4) of this title that has a direct interest in the outcome of the lobbying activity.

#### (b) Written lobbying contacts

Any person or entity registered under this chapter that makes a written lobbying contact (including an electronic communication) with a covered legislative branch official or a covered executive branch official shall—

(1) if the client on whose behalf the lobbying contact was made is a foreign entity, identify such client, state that the client is considered a foreign entity under this chapter, and state whether the person making the lobbying contact is registered on behalf of that client under section 1603 of this title; and

(2) identify any other foreign entity identified pursuant to section 1603(b)(4) of this title that has a direct interest in the outcome of the lobbying activity.

#### (c) Identification as covered official

Upon request by a person or entity making a lobbying contact, the individual who is contacted or the office employing that individual shall indicate whether or not the individual is a covered legislative branch official or a covered executive branch official.

(Pub. L. 104–65, §14, Dec. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 702.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a)(1) and (b), was in the original "this Act" meaning Pub. L. 104–65, Dec. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 691, known as the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, see section 24 of Pub. L. 104–65, set out as a note under section 1601 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 115

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 115 appear at 72 FR 50038, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 115.64 Timeliness requirement.

There must be no Execution or approval of a bond by a PSB Surety after commencement of work under a Contract unless the Surety obtains written approval from the D/SG. To apply for such approval, the Surety must submit a completed “Surety Bond Guarantee Agreement Addendum” (SBA Form 991), together with the evidence and certifications described in § 115.19(f)(1)(ii). For purposes of this section, work has commenced under a Contract when a Principal takes any action related to the contract or bond that would have exposed its Surety to liability under applicable law had a bond been Executed (or approved, if the Surety is legally bound by such approval) at the time.

[61 FR 3271, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 87 FR 48084, Aug. 8, 2022]
HomeAbout NRCGrant OpportunitiesGrant Awards

# Grant Awards - 2019

        - FY19 Faculty Development Grant Awards
        - FY19 Fellowship Grant Awards
        - FY19 Scholarship Grant Awards
        - FY19 Trade School and Community College Scholarship Grant Awards

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 20, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024 FOA Awards
          - 2023 FOA Awards
          - 2022 FOA Awards
          - 2021 FOA Awards
          - 2020 FOA Awards
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2009
          - 2010
          - 2011
          - 2012
          - 2013
          - 2014
          - 2015
          - Success Stories

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 20, 2020
§ 206.435 Project identification and selection criteria. ( a ) *Identification.* It is the State's responsibility to identify and select eligible hazard mitigation projects. All funded projects must be consistent with the State Mitigation Plan. Hazard Mitigation projects will be identified and prioritized through the State, Indian tribal, and local planning process.
( b ) *Selection.* The State will establish procedures and priorities for the selection of mitigation measures. At a minimum, the criteria must be consistent with the criteria stated in § 206.434(c) and include: ( 1 ) Measures that best fit within an overall plan for development and/or hazard mitigation in the community, disaster area, or State;
( 2 ) Measures that, if not taken, will have a severe detrimental impact on the applicant, such as potential loss of life, loss of essential services, damage to critical facilities, or economic hardship on the community;
( 3 ) Measures that have the greatest potential impact on reducing future disaster losses;
( c ) *Other considerations.* In addition to the selection criteria noted above, consideration should be given to measures that are designed to accomplish multiple objectives including damage reduction, environmental enhancement, and economic recovery, when appropriate.
[55 FR 35537, Aug. 30, 1990, as amended at 66 FR 8853, Feb. 26, 2002; 68 FR 63738, Nov. 10, 2003; 86 FR 50678, Sept. 10, 2021]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-136 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, August 3, 1998)

NRC SCHEDULES MEETINGS ON URANIUM, THORIUM

IN TEXAS, NEW MEXICO, WYOMING, COLORADO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold public meetings this month in

Austin, Texas; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Casper, Wyoming; and Denver, Colorado, to

discuss improving the regulatory framework used to license and regulate uranium and

thorium extraction facilities, mill tailings and associated activities.

NRC and industry experience in using and implementing the current regulations,

particularly in the last few years, has led the NRC staff to undertake a review of the

existing requirements to determine ways of implementing a more consistent and

effective program.

The Austin meeting will be August 24 at the Homer Thornberry Judicial Building,

903 San Jacinto, Room 116. The Albuquerque meeting is set for August 25 at the

Federal Building, 517 Gold Street, S.W., Room 4031. The Casper meeting will be held

August 26 at the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, Basco Building, 777

West 1st Street. The Denver meeting will be August 27 at the Federal Office Building,

1961 Stout Street, Conference Room 1083.

All meetings will begin at 9:00 a.m.

The NRC has scheduled the four meetings to obtain early public comment on

how best to revise its current regulatory framework for licensing of uranium and thorium

extraction. Among the items to be discussed is a paper by the National Mining

Association, called “Recommendations for a Coordinated Approach to Regulating the

Uranium Recovery Industry.” Copies of that document are available for review or

purchase at the NRC Public Document Room, Washington, D.C. 20555, telephone:

202/634-3273. The NRC also intends to use the meetings to seek information on what

environmental issues the agency should consider in the environmental assessment or

environmental impact statement that will be issued in association with any rulemaking

that could be undertaken.

The NRC staff will make a short presentation at each meeting to provide

background on the purpose and issues identified to date. However, the primary

purpose of the meetings is to obtain public comment. Persons who wish to speak are
asked to register by August 21 with Anne E. Ramirez, Uranium Recovery Branch, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, telephone: 301/415-6631,

e-mail: aeg@nrc.gov.

Further information is available from Myron H. Fliegel, also of the NRC’s

Uranium Recovery Branch, telephone: 301/415-6629, e-mail: mhf1@nrc.gov.

###
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-78 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, May 20, 1998)

NRC ORDER TO PECO ENERGY COMPANY

CONFIRMS AGREEMENT TO COMPLETE FIRE BARRIER CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a confirmatory order to the PECO

Energy Company confirming the utility’s commitment to complete Thermo-Lag fire barrier

corrective actions at its Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, by Spring 1999. The plant

is located about 20 miles northwest of Philadelphia, Pa.

In a letter to PECO officials, Sam Collins, Director of the NRC’s Office of Nuclear

Reactor Regulation, said the order was issued because of concern “that some licensees may

not be making adequate progress toward resolving the plant-specific issues, and that some

implementation schedules may either be too tenuous or too protracted.” Limerick is one of the

plants that have completion action scheduled beyond 1997.

Thermo-Lag is a fire barrier material manufactured and supplied by Thermal Science,

Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, and has been used to provide fire-resistance to wiring and

equipment at nuclear plants. The NRC staff has been concerned that Thermo-Lag 330-1 fire

barrier systems installed by some of its licensees may not provide the intended level of fire

protection and that licensees using them may not be meeting regulatory requirements.

Between 1992 and 1994, the NRC staff issued letters to all nuclear utilities asking licensees to

submit plans and schedules for resolving the issue. All licensees with Thermo-Lag fire barriers

have implemented around-the-clock “fire watches,” using workers to patrol vital plant areas on

a regular basis to watch for signs of fire until corrective actions are completed.

In his letter to PECO officials, Collins noted that NRC staff have been meeting with

licensees to review their progress in completing implementation of their fire barrier programs,

but have been concerned with slow progress on resolution of the issue at certain plants.

PECO was one of the licensees with which NRC staff has periodically held meetings. At

these meetings, the NRC staff reviewed PECO’s schedule for Thermo-Lag corrective actions--

submitted to the NRC in 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1997--and concluded they are

reasonable. the company formally agreed on April 27 to the terms of the confirmatory order.

Other utilities are expected to receive similar orders in the coming months.

##
**EXHIBIT32**

**Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted**

**pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Eastern American Natural Gas Trust (the “Trust”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not inits individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Trust at the dates and for the periods presented.

The abovecertification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q oras a separate disclosure document.
|                 | The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.,  Trustee, |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Trustee for Eastern American Natural Gas Trust      |
|                 |                                                |
|                 |                                                |
|                 | By:                                                 | /s/ Mike Ulrich |   |
|                 | Vice President                                      |
|                 | The Bank of New  York Trust Company, N.A.,          |
|                 | Trustee                                             |
|                 |                                                |
|                 |                                                |
| Date: August 9, 2007 |                                                |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. No. 106-393) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Davy Crockett National Forest Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) meeting will meet on November 4, 2004.

# DATES:

The Davy Crockett National Forest RAC meeting will be held on November 4, 2004.

# ADDRESSES:

The Davy Crockett National Forest RAC meeting will be held at the Davy Crockett Ranger Station located on State Highway 7, approximately one-quarter mile west of FM 227 in Houston County, Texas. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 9 p.m. A public comment period will be at 8:45 p.m. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Raoul Gagne, District Ranger, Davy Crockett National Forest, Rt. 1, Box 55 FS, Kennard, Texas 75847: Telephone: 936-655-2299 or e-mail at:                         *rgagne@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Davy Crockett National Forest RAC proposes projects and funding to the Secretary of Agriculture under section 203 of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act of 2000. The purpose of the November 4, 2004 meeting is to review and approve project proposals to submit to the Forest Supervisor for National Forests and Grasslands in Texas. These meetings are open to the public. The public may present written comments to the RAC. Each formal RAC meeting will also have time, as identified above, allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. 

Dated: October 7, 2004.

Raoul W. Gagne,

Designated Federal Officer, Davy Crockett National Forest RAC.

[FR Doc. 04-23019  Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-147 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, October 21, 1996)

NOTE TO EDITORS -- ACRS MEETING

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a

meeting November 5, in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss the

qualification of candidates for appointment to the ACRS.

The meeting of the ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and

Procedures, will be held from 12:00 noon to 1:30 p.m in Room T2B1, Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike. The meeting

will be open to public observation with the exception of a

portion that may be closed to discuss organizational and

personnel matters.

Other aspects of the meeting, including the opportunity for

public comment, are described in a Notice of Meeting published in

the October 21 edition of the Federal Register.

#
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

I-99-104

December 16, 1999

NRC SENDS INSPECTOR TO NEW JERSEY IN RESPONSE TO BROKEN EXIT SIGN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has dispatched an inspector to Robbinsville, N.J.,

in response to the discovery of a broken exit sign containing radioactive tritium. The material

does not pose any immediate health hazard to workers at the office or members of public.

At about 11 a.m. today, Sovereign Consulting Inc. reported it was in possession of the

broken sign at its Robbinsville office. It had been transported there by an employee from a site in

Whippany, N.J., where Sovereign is overseeing the demolition of several buildings owned by

Rowe International Inc. Once at the office, it was determined that at least one of the tubes inside

the sign that contains tritium used for illumination purposes was broken.

The NRC inspector was performing wipe surveys for any radioactive contamination in

the area where the sign was stored and other areas, if necessary. The Whippany site will also be

inspected in the near future.

About 30 other tritium exit signs were also retrieved from the demolition site, but they

have been found to be intact.

Tritium exit signs are licensed by the NRC under a general license. Owners are required

under terms of the license either to return them to the manufacturer or dispose of them by

approved means at the end of their use.

#