alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-97-51 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Tuesday, July

1, 1997)

Contacts:Ken Clark (404) 562-4416

Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PLANT RATED "SUPERIOR" IN TWO AREAS,

"GOOD" IN TWO OTHER AREAS OF NRC ASSESSMENT REPORT

The Brunswick nuclear power plant received performance

ratings of "superior" in two areas and "good" in the two other

areas of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s latest systematic

assessment of licensee performance (SALP) of the facility.

The SALP report was sent June 27 to Carolina Power & Light

Company, which operates the facility near Southport, North

Carolina. It evaluates the plant's performance from May 14, 1995

through May 24 of this year.

NRC and CP&L officials will discuss the report during a

meeting set for 1:00 p.m. Friday, July 11, at the Brunswick site.

The meeting will be open for public observation. NRC officials

will be available after the meeting to speak with reporters,

state and local officials, and members of the public.

The NRC SALP process rates licensees in four functional

areas ˇ plant operations, maintenance, engineering, and plant

support ˇ and assigns ratings of Category 1, 2 or 3 depending on

whether their performance in those areas was superior, good or

adequate.

The report on Brunswick gives the plant a Category 1 rating

in plant operations and maintenance indicating "superior"

performance, and a Category 2 rating in engineering and plant

support, indicating "good" performance. The ratings in the

plant’s previous SALP report, issued in June 1995, were Category

1's in all four areas assessed.

In his cover letter to the report, NRC Regional

Administrator Luis Reyes said performance in plant operations was

"characterized by good management oversight through control of

daily plant activities and clear management expectations." He
said maintenance performance was superior with "record-setting

plant availability, well managed outages and low maintenance

backlogs."

In explaining the decline in engineering, Reyes pointed to

problems in the modifications area and the Environmental

Qualification program. In the plant support area, Reyes said

performance exhibited a suprior level of safety in radioactive

waste and emergency planning, but the area declined due to

deficiencies in the control of collective radiation dose, the

control of radioactive contamination and security.

Overall, Reyes said management made conservative operating

decisions, but safety assessment and quality verification

performance was mixed. He also noted that while self assessments

often identified issues, "corrective action remained a problem."

###

EDITORS: A copy of the full SALP report is available from this office. SALP

reports are also available on the NRC's Internet web site

(www.nrc.gov/OPA) and by e-mail subscription. To receive SALP

reports by e-mail as they are issued, send an e-mail to listproc@nrc.gov

with the following message: subscribe salp yourfirstname yourlastname.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-040 March 17, 2000

NRC AMENDS REGULATIONS TO ADD NAC INTERNATIONAL

MULTI-PURPOSE CANISTER DESIGN TO APPROVED LIST

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is amending its regulations to add the NAC MultiPurpose Canister (NAC-MPC) cask system to the list of approved cask designs that utilities may use --

under a general license and without site-specific approval -- to store spent fuel safely at their nuclear

power plants.

Any nuclear power reactor licensee may use an NRC-approved cask design to store spent fuel if

they notify the NRC in advance, store the fuel under certain conditions, and meet requirements of the

general license. These requirements ensure that the reactor site characteristics and potential siteboundary radiation doses are within the scope of the cask’s safety analysis report and the reactor

license.

The NAC-MPC cask system certificate contains conditions for use that are similar to other

NRC-approved casks. However, the certificate for each cask design may differ

in some specific areas, such as operating procedures, training and spent fuel specifications.

The NAC-MPC cask system is designed to be used as a dual purpose storage and transportation

cask. It was certified for transport of spent fuel last March.

The NRC staff issued a Safety Evaluation Report which finds that use of the cask will provide

adequate protection of public health and safety. Slight modifications to the rule were made based on

comments received after the staff’s August 23 proposal to add the NAC-MPC cask system to the list of

approved casks.

The rule will become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, expected

shortly.

###
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
### Part C—Summer Youth Program
### Subtitle B—Coverage
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-047 March 17, 2000

RELOCATION OF NRC TECHNICAL TRAINING CENTER DEFERRED

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is deferring its recent decision to relocate its Technical

Training Center from Chattanooga, Tennessee, to a location in close proximity to the NRC

headquarters in Rockville, Maryland, pending completion of a General Accounting Office (GAO) study

on the merits of the move.

The Commission had decided to relocate the facility in order to improve the agency’s training

program. The move would enable experts at headquarters to work more closely with trainers to ensure

that the NRC training program meets the demands of the NRC’s new regulatory reform efforts.

However, in light of Congressional concerns, the Commission has decided to delay

implementation until the GAO has had an opportunity to conduct an independent study. The

Commission has directed the NRC staff to take no further action to implement the relocation of the

Chattanooga facility until the GAO has issued its report and the Commission has had an opportunity to

review any GAO recommendations.

Under the plan approved by the Commission on February 24, the Technical Training Center

would have remained in Chattanooga until at least March 2003, although a portion of the Center’s 26

staff members would have been relocated in Maryland by September 2001.

###
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7198

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMAL MITCHELL, a/k/a Boo,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00025-TSE-1)

Submitted: January 17, 2020 Decided: January 30, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamal Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying Mitchell’s motions to 

amend his forfeiture order, to return real property, and to vacate a stipulation and settlement 

agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 

1:02-cr-00025-TSE-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 6, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
- Skip to Primary Navigation
    - Skip to Main Content
    - Skip to Footer

        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   

      -  Water & Power          - Dams
        - Powerplants
        - Projects
        - Agrimet/Hydromet
        - Water Operations 
      -  Resources & Research          - Programs
        - Technical Service Center
        - Research & Development
        - Reclamation Manual
        - Environmental Resources/Reports
        - Library 
      -  About Us          - Mission
        - Fact Sheet
        - Commissioner
        - Addresses/Contacts
        - Organizational Chart
        - Leadership Bios
        - Employment
        - Contact 
      -  Recreation & Public Use          - Find Recreation
        - Recreation.gov
        - Public Use 
      -  News & Multimedia          - News Releases
        - News Stories
        - Speeches
        - Congressional Testimony
        - Fact Sheets
        - Photos
        - Multimedia
        - Social Media 

# California-Great Basin

Welcome to the Bureau of Reclamation California-Great Basin

            - Reclamation
            - California-Great Basin
            - CVP
            - Ratesetting
            - CVP Annual Ratebooks & Schedules
            - CVP Ratebooks - Irrigation, 2014     

Region 10              - Region 10 Home
              - About Us
              - Area Offices
              - Central Valley Project (CVP)                  - About the CVP
                - Water Info Links
                - Ratesetting
                - Projects/Activities
                - Consultation on the Coordinated Long-Term Operation                         of the CVP and SWP
                - Laws/Regs/Links
                - Financial Information 
                - Long-Term Water Transfer Program
                - Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) 
              - Programs & Activities
              - Projects & Facilities
              - Doing Business with Reclamation
              - Public Affairs
              - Employment
              - Recreation
              - Site Index
              - Contact Us

## CVP Ratebooks - Irrigation, 2014

*Note:  Documents in Portable Document Format (PDF) require Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher to view, download Adobe Acrobat Reader*

*Last Updated: 7/15/20*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

          - Contact Us
          - Site Index
          - Accessibility
          - Disclaimer
          - DOI
          - FOIA
          - No Fear Act
          - Notices
          - Privacy Policy
          - Quality of Information
          - Recreation.gov
          - USA.gov
No: I-23-011 September 8, 2023 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC to Conduct Predecisional Enforcement Conference 

with Virginia Firm to Discuss Apparent Violations

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of a Dulles, Virginia, 

company Sept. 14 to discuss apparent violations associated with radiological controls required 

during nuclear medicine packaging operations and a related worker overexposure. The controls 

deficiencies and overexposure took place at Sofie Co.’s Kansas City, Missouri, site, which is a 

facility within the NRC’s jurisdiction.

The in-person meeting will take place from 1-3 p.m. at the NRC’s Region I Office, located 

at 475 Allendale Road in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. It will be open to the public. The public 

can also participate via a toll-free teleconference line. 

During the predecisional enforcement conference, company representatives will be able to 

elaborate on what happened and provide additional information regarding the event and related 

issues. They will also be able to address other programmatic concerns identified during NRC 

inspections, prior to the agency making its final enforcement decision. In addition, company 

representatives will discuss corrective actions, both taken and planned, to address the issues and 

prevent a recurrence. 

The NRC identified three apparent violations. One stems from a failure by the company to 

ensure that one of its employees did not exceed an NRC annual occupational radiation dose limit. 

The overexposure occurred while the nuclear pharmacy technician was packaging doses of a 

radioactive drug at the Kansas City site for shipment to other licensed facilities. In addition, the 

NRC determined that Sofie did not ensure that a different employee was wearing proper radiation 

monitoring equipment while handling radiopharmaceuticals, nor restrict access to an area with 

certain radiation levels at the Sofie site in Morgantown, West Virginia. 

Sofie notified the NRC that it has taken corrective actions to address the issues identified. 

Among other things, the company took measures to ensure the individual, who was not harmed, did 

not receive additional exposure to radiation. 

NRC staff will issue a final decision, which will be publicly available, after considering all 

relevant information.
#### § 7.922 Exceptions to the rules against age discrimination: Reasonable factors other than age.

A recipient is permitted to take an action otherwise prohibited by § 7.920 which is based on a factor other than age, even though that action may have a disproportionate effect on persons of different ages only if the factor bears a direct and substantial relationship to the normal operation of the program or activity or to the achievement of a statutory objective.
§ 71.5 Violations. ( a ) Any flood insurance policy which has been issued where the terms of this section have not been complied with or is otherwise inconsistent with the provisions of this section, is void *ab initio* and without effect.
( b ) Any false statements or false representations of any kind made in connection with the requirements of this part may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S. Code section 1001.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 440

**Question 440:** In order to terminate a declaration of pregnancy, i.e., due to termination of the pregnancy or otherwise, must the female worker inform the licensee or employer in writing?

**Answer:** No. There is no requirement in the regulation specifying how to terminate a declaration. However, since the declaration of pregnancy is required to be in writing, it would be a good practice to terminate the declaration in the same manner.

 (References: 10 CFR 20.1208, 10 CFR 20.1003)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Hypercom Corporation on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-40457, 333-40459, 333-40461
and 333-40333) of our reports dated July 20, 1999, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Hypercom
Corporation as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and for the years ended June 30, 1999,
1998 and 1997, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                          PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
September 20, 1999
**Exhibit 4.6****Summary of Employment Arrangements****between Bayer Aktiengesellschaft****and Klaus Kühn**Term: K. Kühn was appointed member of the Board of Management of the Company by theSupervisory Board effective May 1, 2002. The term will expire on April 30, 2007.Compensation: The aggregate remuneration of K. Kühn for 2005 is comprised of the followingelements:Base  salary: EUR 412,236. K. Kühn also received remuneration in kind and other paymentstotaling EUR 35,266 and consisting mainly of amounts such as the value assigned for taxationpurposes to the use of a company car.Fixed supplement: EUR 170,647Variable bonus: EUR 843,713 (determined by attainment of the group EBITDA target)Stock-based compensation: The current entitlement for 2005 — along with compensationarising from previous years’ programs, parts of which are not yet earned was EUR 285,748.     Retirement: K. Kühn is entitled to receive pension up from the age of 60. The yearlypension entitlement is based on at least 30% of the sum of the last yearly base salary and fixedsupplement. This percentage increases over time depending on years of service as a Board member anddetermines the final target pension level which is capped at 80%. Upon expiration of the currentterm the level of 80% will be reached. These amounts are in addition to any amounts received as aresult of his participation in Bayer’s Employee Pension Plan (See Item 6).
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

 

 To: George Faison/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

 Date: 11/22/2011 06:05 PM 

 

 Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Boilers MACT Rule 

 

Hi, 

Attached is the handout from the meeting today. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Boilers MACT Rule 

When: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 5:00 PM-5:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern 

Time (US & Canada). 

Where: Room 10103 NEOB 

This meeting was requested by Lisa Jaeger, Bracewell & Giuliani on 

behalf of CIBO.(See attached file: 

2060-AR13_2011_11_22_CIBO_Handout.pdf)
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****Carl D. Perkins Vocational andTechnical Education Act of 1998 [electronic resource] : report to Congress onstate performance year**
 
2000 | 2001 | 2002| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007
 
SuDoc:ED 1.2:V 85/9/
Item Number:0455-B-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000792462
 
October 25, 2017
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.202 Definitions. The following definitions apply for purposes of §§ 10.201 through 10.207: ( a ) *Beneficiary country.* Except as otherwise provided in § 10.206(b), the term “beneficiary country” refers to any country or successor political entity with respect to which there is in effect a proclamation by the President designating such country or successor political entity as a beneficiary country in accordance with section 203 of the ATPA (19 U.S.C. 3202).
( b ) *Eligible articles.* The term “eligible” when used with reference to an article means merchandise which is imported directly from a beneficiary country as provided in § 10.204, which meets the country of origin criteria set forth in § 10.205 and the value-content requirement set forth in § 10.206, and which, if the requirements of § 10.207 are met, is therefore entitled to duty-free treatment under the ATPA. However, the following merchandise shall not be considered eligible articles entitled to duty-free treatment under the ATPA: ( 1 ) Textiles and apparel articles which were not eligible articles for purposes of the ATPA on January 1, 1994, as the ATPA was in effect on that date, except as otherwise provided in §§ 10.241 through 10.248;
( 2 ) Rum and tafia classified in subheading 2208.40, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States;
( 3 ) Sugars, syrups, and sugar-containing products subject to over-quota duty rates under applicable tariff-rate quotas; or
( 4 ) Tuna prepared or preserved in any manner in airtight containers, except as otherwise provided in §§ 10.251 through 10.257.
( c ) *Entered.* The term “entered” means entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, in the customs territory of the United States.
( d ) *Wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of a beneficiary country.* The expression “wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of a beneficiary country” has the same meaning as that set forth in § 10.191(b)(3) of this part.
[T.D. 98-76, 63 FR 51292, Sept. 25, 1998, as amended by T.D. 03-16, 68 FR 14486, Mar. 25, 2003; 68 FR 67338, Dec. 1, 2003]
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the amendment no. 1 to the annual report of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Guy Bernstein,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|(1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
          applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  December 29 , 2008 |  | /s/ Guy Bernstein

Guy BernsteinChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
#### Myrtle Hawley, Appellant, v. Home Savings Bank of White Plains et al., Defendants, and Scarsdale National Bank and Trust Company, Respondent.

Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
#### § 353.1 Purpose.

This part sets out fees charged for site-specific radiological emergency planning and preparedness services rendered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, as authorized by 31 U.S.C. 9701.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5255 

To streamline the budget process at the Department of Defense. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2022 

Ms. WARREN (for herself, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. LEE, and Mr. KING) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To streamline the budget process at the Department of 

Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Streamline Pentagon 

5 Budgeting Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RELATED 

7 TO UNFUNDED PRIORITIES. 

8 Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, is amend9 ed— 

10 (1) by repealing section 222a; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5255 IS

1 (2) by repealing section 222b; and 

2 (3) in the table of sections at the beginning of 

3 the chapter, by striking the items relating to sec4 tions 222a and 222b. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS