alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 96-49 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson August 22, 1996

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

ARKANSAS PLANTS RATED "SUPERIOR" IN THREE AREAS

"GOOD" IN ONE IN LATEST NRC ASSESSMENT

The Arkansas Nuclear One nuclear power plant has received performance

ratings of "superior" in plant operations, engineering and plant support,

and "good" in maintenance in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's latest

systematic assessment of licensee performance (SALP).

The SALP report was sent Aug. 2 to Entergy Operations, Inc., operator

of the twin reactor facility situated near Russellville, Arkansas. It

evaluates plant safety performance from January 8, 1995, through July 6,

1996.

NRC and Entergy officials will discuss the report during a meeting set

for 11 a.m. August 29 in the Reeves E. Ritchie Training Facility in

Russellville. The meeting will be open for public observation. NRC

officials will be available afterwards to speak with reporters, state and

local officials, and members of the public.

NRC systematic assessment reports rate licensees in four functional

areas--plant operations, maintenance, engineering, and plant support--and

assigns ratings of Category 1, 2, or 3 corresponding to superior, good or

adequate safety performance. The ANO report rates the plant "Category 1"

in plant operations, engineering and plant support, indicating superior

performance. It rates maintenance as "Category 2" indicating good safety

performance.

In his cover letter to the report, NRC Regional Administrator L. Joe

Callan said continued strong performance by licensed operators was

noteworthy in the operations area. He also attributed improvements in the

plant's engineering activities to strong self assessments and more thorough

design control and operations support work.

-more-
-2-

Discussing the plant's rating decline in maintenance since the

previous report, Mr. Callan said:

"Although performance in the maintenance area remained strong, several

significant performance exceptions posed the potential for common-mode

failures at the facility and impacted safety-system performance. Taken

together, these exceptions were considered sufficient to warrant a decline

in category rating."

But he said that overall performance in the plant support area

remained superior with continued progress apparent in reducing occupational

radiation exposures.

In conclusion, Mr. Callan wrote, "The self-assessments conducted by

quality, line and corporate organizations improved and played a significant

role in the overall strong performance at the ANO facility."

-30-

Editors: A copy of the full SALP report is available from this office

on request. It also will be available in electronic format on the NRC

Office of Public Affairs Internet home page at http://www.nrc.gov/OPA.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-98-55 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Friday, August 28, 1998)

NRC RATES SUMMER NUCLEAR PLANT "SUPERIOR"

IN ALL FOUR AREAS OF LATEST ASSESSMENT REPORT

The Summer nuclear power plant received performance ratings of "superior" in all four

areas of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s latest systematic assessment of licensee

performance (SALP) of the facility.

The SALP report was issued August 26 to South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, which

operates the facility near Jenkinsville, South Carolina. It evaluates the plant's performance

from October 27, 1996 through July 25 of this year.

NRC and SCE&G officials will discuss the report during a meeting set for 1:00 p.m. Friday,

September 11, at the Summer site. The meeting will be open for public observation, and

NRC officials will be available after the meeting to speak with reporters, state and local

officials, and members of the public.

The NRC SALP process rates licensees in four functional areas — plant operations,

maintenance, engineering, and plant support — and assigns ratings of Category 1, 2 or 3

depending on whether their performance in those areas was superior, good or adequate.

The report on Summer gives the plant a Category 1 rating in plant operations,

maintenance, engineering and plant support indicating "superior" performance. The ratings

in the plant’s previous SALP report, issued in December 1996, were Category 1's in plant

operations, maintenance and engineering and Category 2 in plant support.

In his cover letter to the report, NRC Regional Administrator Luis Reyes said the “high level

of performance resulted from the strong focus and teamwork of all those associated with

the operation of the facility.” He said senior managers set high standards, were actively

involved and made conservative decisions during the assessment period.

Reyes also noted that challenges identified during the previous SALP period in the plant

support area were addressed and there were improvements in the control of contaminated

material and in the emergency management program.

As result of the Summer plant’s superior performance, the next SALP period will be 24

months and the plant will receive a reduced level of NRC inspection.

###
EDITORS: A copy of the full SALP report is available from this office. SALP reports are

also available on the NRC's Internet web site (www.nrc.gov/OPA) and by e-mail

subscription. To receive SALP reports by e-mail as they are issued, send an e-mail to

listproc@nrc.gov with the following message: subscribe salp yourfirstname yourlastname.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-35 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, March 12, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on

Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a meeting March 31 and April 1 in

Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will begin at 8:30 a.m.

each day in Room T-2B3, of the NRC's One White Flint North Building at 11545

Rockville Pike. The Subcommittee on Advanced Reactor Designs will hear

presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff and

Westinghouse Electric Corp. on the AP600 standard safety analysis report and the draft

final safety evaluation report chapters 2,9,10,12,13 and 15. Some portions of the

meeting dealing with proprietary information may be closed.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for public comment, will

be described in a Notice of Meeting published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal

Register.

#
§ 70.6 Distribution of Letter of Map Amendment. ( a ) A copy of the Letter of Map Amendment shall be sent to the applicant who submitted scientific or technical data to the Federal Insurance Administrator.
( b ) A copy of the Letter of Map Amendment shall be sent to the local map repository with instructions that it be attached to the map which the Letter of Map Amendment is amending.
( c ) A copy of the Letter of Map Amendment shall be sent to the map repository in the state with instructions that it be attached to the map which it is amending.
( d ) A copy of the Letter of Map Amendment will be sent to any community or governmental unit that requests such Letter of Map Amendment.
( e ) [Reserved]
( f ) A copy of the Letter of Map Amendment will be maintained by the Agency in its community case file.
[41 FR 46991, Oct. 26, 1976. Redesignated at 44 FR 31177, May 31, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 44544 and 44553, Sept. 29, 1983; 49 FR 4751, Feb. 8, 1984]
§ 109.320 ILP Loan purposes. ( a ) ILP Loan funds must only be used to provide direct loans to Eligible Small Business Concerns for working capital, real estate, or the acquisition of materials, supplies, furniture, fixtures, or equipment.
( b ) ILP Loan funds must not be used for any other purpose, including maintenance of loan loss reserves or payment of administrative costs or expenses of the ILP Intermediary.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


March 25, 2002



Management Report on Internal Control Over Servicing of Securitized Automobile
Financing Receivables

Management of the Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. is responsible for establishing
and maintaining effective internal control over servicing of securitized
automobile financing receivables, which is designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the proper servicing of securitized automobile financing
receivables. The internal control system contains self-monitoring mechanisms,
and actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

There are inherent limitations in any internal control, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls.
Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to servicing of securitized automobile financing
receivables. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of
internal control may vary over time.

Management of the Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. assessed its internal control
over servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables as of December
31, 2001 in relation to criteria for effective internal control established in
"Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management
believes that, as of December 31, 2001, the Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
maintained effective internal control over servicing of securitized automobile
financing receivables.


                                                  /s/ Jeffrey S. Browning
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Jeffrey S. Browning
                                                  Vice President
                                                  Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-46 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, March 9, 1999)

NRC CONSIDERING REQUEST BY OHIO

TO BE AN ‘AGREEMENT STATE’

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is considering a request that Ohio assume part of

NRC’s regulatory authority over certain nuclear materials. If the request is accepted, Ohio will

become the 31st state to sign such an agreement with NRC.

Under the agreement, NRC would transfer to Ohio the responsibility for licensing,

rulemaking, inspection and enforcement concerning the use of (1) radioactive materials

produced as byproducts during operation of certain nuclear reactors; (2) uranium and thorium

source materials; and (3) small quantities of fissionable materials.

The agreement also would allow the state to regulate the land disposal of radioactive

waste and to conduct safety evaluations of sealed radioactive sources and devices for medical

and industrial use.

By law, NRC retains jurisdiction over regulation of nuclear reactors and other major

nuclear facilities. It also continues to regulate Federal agencies which use certain nuclear

materials and companies which distribute such materials (as in smoke detectors) to members

of the public.

If the agreement is approved, about 550 NRC licenses, most of them for medical and

industrial uses, would be transferred to Ohio’s jurisdiction.

Before entering into the agreement, NRC must determine that the State’s radiation

control program is adequate to protect public health and safety, and is compatible with the

agency’s own program for regulating the radioactive materials covered in the agreement.

The proposed agreement, along with an assessment of the Ohio proposed regulatory

program, will be published for public comment shortly in the Federal Register and will be

published once each week for the three weeks afterwards. Comments should be sent to David

L. Meyer, Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch, Division of Freedom of Information and

Publications Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555-0001.

###
Exhibit
32.1




CEO
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350*







In
connection with the Annual Report of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10--K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shaun A. Burke,
Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer)of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.




/s/ Shaun A.
Burke




Shaun A.
Burke


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)




March 31,
2009




* A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-78 September 13, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC SELECTS NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT INDIAN POINT 3

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia,

Pa., have selected Peter D. Drysdale as the new Senior Resident

Inspector at the Indian Point 3 nuclear power plant in Buchanan,

N.Y. He succeeds David Lew, who was reassigned to the Regional

Office.

Mr. Drysdale began his NRC career as a reactor engineer in

the Operational Programs Section of the Region I Division of

Reactor Safety (DRS). He was promoted to a senior reactor

engineer in the Performance Programs Section of DRS, and later

worked in the Systems Section in DRS. Most recently, he was the

Senior Resident Inspector at the Ginna nuclear power plant in

Ontario, N.Y.

Prior to joining the NRC, Mr. Drysdale worked as a

refueling engineer at the Mare Island Naval Shipyard in Vallejo,

Calif.; as a project engineer and refueling engineer at the naval

prototype sites operated by the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory in

Windsor, Conn., and West Milton, N.Y.; and as a test engineer at

the Mare Island and Bremerton (Washington) Naval Shipyards. He

served in the Strategic Air Command of the United States Air

Force and was stationed at Vandenberg Air Force Base in

California.

Mr. Drysdale earned a bachelor of science degree in nuclear

engineering from the University of California.

He joins resident inspector Laura Dudes at Indian Point 3.

They can be reached at 914/739-8565.

#
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-13 February 10, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT JERSEY CITY MEDICAL CENTER

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of Jersey City Medical Center

on Tuesday, February 15, to discuss several apparent violations of agency requirements at the Jersey

City, N.J., facility. The apparent violations involve the handling of radioactive materials.

The Predecisional Enforcement Conference, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to

begin at 1 p.m. in the Public Meeting Room of the NRC Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa. NRC

staff will remain after the meeting to answer questions from interested members of the public.

Based on an inspection conducted on January 5 at the medical center, the NRC staff has

identified three apparent violations that are being considered for escalated enforcement. They are: 1.)

failure to follow package receipt procedures; 2.) failure to secure licensed radioactive materials from

unauthorized access; and 3.) failure to provide adequate training to individuals involved in the receipt

and use of licensed radioactive materials.

The decision to hold a pre-decisional enforcement conference does not mean that the NRC has

determined that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose

is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee an

opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to

enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this conference. Those decisions will

be made by senior NRC officials at a later time.

#
Exhibit 32.1
           Broadcast International, Inc. & Subsidiaries
             Certification Of Chief Executive Officer
    Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
          Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Broadcast International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Rodney Tiede, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)  The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
           13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
           all material respects, the financial condition and results of
           operations of the Company.

Date: May 16, 2005

/s/ Rodney Tiede
----------------------------
Rodney Tiede
Chief Executive Officer
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-98-22 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Tuesday, March 24, 1998)

NRC STAFF SETS ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE WITH FPC

TO DISCUSS REGULATORY CONCERNS AT CRYSTAL RIVER

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a predecisional

enforcement conference with Florida Power Corporation in Atlanta on April 2 to discuss

regulatory concerns associated with the Crystal River Nuclear Plant’s emergency

operating procedures.

During an NRC inspection in January, an apparent violation was noted involving

safety evaluations for procedure changes and a change to the plant’s Updated Final

Safety Analysis Report. In changing procedures for equipment which would be used to

cool the plant in certain post-accident situations, the plant staff failed to identify that the

changes could potentially increase the consequences of the accident. During at least

two periods since the plant began operation, there were no procedures which allowed

the plant operators to use a crossover line between two low pressure injection lines to

mitigate the effects of certain accidents. In addition, the plant staff had identified

design limitations related to the crossover but failed to take appropriate and timely

corrective actions.

The conference will be held at 10:30 a.m. in the NRC Region II office in Atlanta,

located on the 24th floor of the Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, S. W. The

meeting is open to observation by members of the public, and NRC officials will be

available at its conclusion to answer questions from interested observers.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean

that a determination has been made that a violation has occurred or that enforcement

action will be taken. The purpose is to discuss the apparent violations, their causes

and safety significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity to point out errors

that may have been made in NRC inspection reports; and to enable the licensee to

outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action,

such as a civil penalty, will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made

by NRC officials at a later time.

#
#### § 400.106 *Ex parte* communications.

Oral or written communication, not on the public record, between any member of the Board and any party or parties interested in any matter pending before the Board concerning the substance of that matter is prohibited.

[66 FR 53079, Oct. 19, 2001]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

 CASE NO.: 20-cv-81205-RAR 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, 

 INC. d/b/a/ PAR FUNDING, et al., 

____________________________________________/ 

PLAINTIFF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S NOTICE OF FILING 

EVIDENCE REFERENCED AND READ DURING THE AUGUST 3, 2020 

HEARING ON DEFENDANT DEAN VAGNOZZI’S 

“EXPEDITED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AS TO DEPOSITION” 

 

 Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission hereby files the correspondence referenced 

during the August 3, 2020 hearing on Defendant Dean Vagnozzi’s “Expedited Motion for 

Protective Order as to Deposition,” reflecting that undersigned counsel offered to take the 

deposition on Tuesday, August 4 or Wednesday, August 5, 2020. [Exhibit A]. 

August 3, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

 By: s/ Amie Riggle Berlin 

 Amie Riggle Berlin 

 Senior Trial Counsel 

 Florida Bar No. 630020 

 Direct Dial: (305) 982-6322 

 Email: berlina@sec.gov 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

 COMMISSION 

 801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1800 

 Miami, Florida 33131 

 Telephone: (305) 982-6300 

 Facsimile: (305) 536-4154 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 67 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/03/2020 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served this 3rd day 

of August 2020 via email and cm-ecf on all defense counsel in this case. 

 s/ Amie Riggle Berlin 

 Amie Riggle Berlin 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 67 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/03/2020 Page 2 of 2