alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Waldemar Eitingon, as Trustee, etc., Appellant, v. Williamsburgh City Fire Insurance Company, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
June 15, 2011

Mr. James Wayne Flight Department Safety Officer Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation One Hornet Way XE6D50/D2 El Segundo, CA 90245-2804

Dear Mr. Wayne:

This is in response to your April 26, 2011 letter (public docket No. FAA-2011-0447) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation (Northrop) for an exemption from § 61.57(b) and (e)(3)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would exempt Northrop company pilots from night currency requirements in its single-pilot type certificated

Beechcraft 1900D aircraft.

On May 18, 2011, the FAA contacted Northrop to gain further clarification regarding its petition. The FAA confirmed that Northrop holds a part 135 operating certificate (Certificate No. NOZA). Additionally, Northrop confirmed that company crewmembers are qualified and current under the part 135 certificate, and company policies are in accordance with Part 135 regulations. Section 61.57(e)(2) states, “This section does not apply to a pilot in command who is employed by an air carrier certificated under part 121 or 135 and is engaged in a flight operation under part 91, 121, or 135 for that air carrier if the pilot is in compliance with §§121.437 and 121.439, or §§135.243 and 135.247 of this chapter, as appropriate.” Therefore, relief from § 61.47(b) is not required.2 Furthermore, since the BE-1900D is not type certificated for more than one pilot crewmember per Type Certificate Datasheet A24CE, relief from § 61.57(e)(3)(ii) is not required. As a result, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division
### §351. Complaints; judge defined

(a) Filing of Complaint by Any Person.—Any person alleging that a judge has engaged in conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts, or alleging that such judge is unable to discharge all the duties of office by reason of mental or physical disability, may file with the clerk of the court of appeals for the circuit a written complaint containing a brief statement of the facts constituting such conduct.

(b) Identifying Complaint by Chief Judge.—In the interests of the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts and on the basis of information available to the chief judge of the circuit, the chief judge may, by written order stating reasons therefor, identify a complaint for purposes of this chapter and thereby dispense with filing of a written complaint.

(c) Transmittal of Complaint.—Upon receipt of a complaint filed under subsection (a), the clerk shall promptly transmit the complaint to the chief judge of the circuit, or, if the conduct complained of is that of the chief judge, to that circuit judge in regular active service next senior in date of commission (hereafter, for purposes of this chapter only, included in the term "chief judge"). The clerk shall simultaneously transmit a copy of the complaint to the judge whose conduct is the subject of the complaint. The clerk shall also transmit a copy of any complaint identified under subsection (b) to the judge whose conduct is the subject of the complaint.

(d) Definitions.—In this chapter—

(1) the term "judge" means a circuit judge, district judge, bankruptcy judge, or magistrate judge; and

(2) the term "complainant" means the person filing a complaint under subsection (a) of this section.

(Added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, §11042(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1848.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Severability

Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, §11044, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1856, provided that: "If any provision of this subtitle [subtitle C (§§11041–11044) of title I of div. C of Pub. L. 107–273, enacting this chapter, amending sections 331, 332, 372, 375, and 604 of this title, and section 7253 of Title 38, Veterans' Benefits, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 1 of this title], an amendment made by this subtitle, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this subtitle, the amendments made by this subtitle, and the application of the provisions of such to any person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby."
§ 63.14 Criteria for State qualification to perform imminent collapse certifications. In order to qualify under this subpart, the State must be administering a coastal zone management program which includes the following components, as a minimum: ( a ) A state-wide requirement that prohibits new construction and the relocation of structures seaward of an adopted erosion setback. Such setback must be based in whole or in part on some multiple of the local mean annual erosion (recession) rate; and
( b ) An established, complete and functional data base of mean annual erosion rates for all reaches of coastal shorelines subject to erosion in the State, which is used as the basis to enforce these setback requirements.
### §535. Investigation of crimes involving Government officers and employees; limitations

(a) The Attorney General and the Federal Bureau of Investigation may investigate any violation of Federal criminal law involving Government officers and employees—

(1) notwithstanding any other provision of law; and

(2) without limiting the authority to investigate any matter which is conferred on them or on a department or agency of the Government.

(b) Any information, allegation, matter, or complaint witnessed, discovered, or received in a department or agency of the executive branch of the Government relating to violations of Federal criminal law involving Government officers and employees shall be expeditiously reported to the Attorney General by the head of the department or agency, or the witness, discoverer, or recipient, as appropriate, unless—

(1) the responsibility to perform an investigation with respect thereto is specifically assigned otherwise by another provision of law; or

(2) as to any department or agency of the Government, the Attorney General directs otherwise with respect to a specified class of information, allegation, or complaint.

(c) This section does not limit—

(1) the authority of the military departments to investigate persons or offenses over which the armed forces have jurisdiction under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (chapter 47 of title 10); or

(2) the primary authority of the Postmaster General to investigate postal offenses.

(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(c), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 616; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. A, title II, §206, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1779.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 311a. | Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1143, §1, 68 Stat. 998. |

Statutes at Large

The section is reorganized for clarity and continuity.

In subsection (a), the word "may" is substituted for "shall have authority". The word "is" is substituted for "may have been or may hereafter be".

In subsection (c), the words "This section does not limit" are substituted for "that the provisions of this section shall not limit, in any way". The words "(chapter 47 of title 10)" are added after "Uniform Code of Military Justice" to reflect the codification of that Code in title 10, United States Code.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–273 substituted "Federal criminal law" for "title 18" in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–273, in introductory provisions, substituted "matter, or complaint witnessed, discovered, or" for "or complaint" and "Federal criminal law" for "title 18" and inserted "or the witness, discoverer, or recipient, as appropriate," after "agency,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Office of Postmaster General of Post Office Department abolished and all functions, powers, and duties of Postmaster General transferred to United States Postal Service by Pub. L. 91–375, §4(a), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 773, set out as a note under section 201 of Title 39, Postal Service.
#### In re ALFA-PET, INC.

No. 01-1365, 90/005,076.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 13, 2002.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, RADER and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.2030 General.

Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, all criminal, civil, or administrative penalties which may be imposed on U.S. importers, exporters, and producers for violations of the customs and related laws and regulations will also apply to U.S. importers, exporters, and producers for violations of the laws and regulations relating to the PANTPA.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Geno Mantani, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
No: I-24-003 February 22, 2024 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC Names New Resident Inspector

at the Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Alex Nugent as the 

resident inspector at the Beaver Valley nuclear power plant in Shippingport, 

Pennsylvania. He joins Senior Resident Inspector Neil Day at the two-unit site, 

which is operated by Energy Harbor.

“Alex has the technical knowledge and experience to immediately 

contribute to the NRC’s oversight at Beaver Valley,” said NRC Region I 

Administrator Ray Lorson. “We welcome him as part of the NRC inspection team 

at the site.”

Nugent joined the NRC in April 2023 at the agency’s Region I Office in King of Prussia, 

Pennsylvania. He began his career with the agency as a project engineer in the Division of 

Operating Reactors. He previously worked as a nuclear engineer at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard. 

He earned a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Delaware.

Each operating U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident 

inspectors who serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, 

monitoring safety-significant projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident 

inspectors can serve at a reactor site for up to seven years.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 99-02 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson January 6, 1999

OFFICE: 817-860-8128

PAGER: 888-876-2331

E-Mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC PROPOSES TO FINE ENTERGY $55,000

FOR VIOLATION AT RIVER BEND NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $55,000 civil penalty

against Entergy Operations, Inc., which operates the River Bend Station, a nuclear power plant

near St. Francisville, La. The proposed fine is the culmination of a case in which the plant’s

Superintendent of Radiation Control deliberately gave the NRC incomplete and inaccurate

information concerning a violation of radiation protection requirements for plant workers.

The specific circumstances of the violation are as follows:

ˇ On October 10, 1997, an NRC inspector observed a minor infraction of radiation work

permit requirements as a contract worker reached into a marked radiation area to check

for contamination without proper protective clothing. No one was contaminated or

injured during the incident.

ˇ On October 15, 1997, in asserting to the NRC Senior Resident Inspection that the

reported activity did not violate procedures, the superintendent presented incomplete

and inaccurate information, which is also a violation of NRC requirements.

ˇ An investigation by NRC’s Office of Investigations concluded that the superintendent

knew the information was inaccurate at the time he presented it to the senior resident

inspector. Predecisional enforcement conferences on the issue were held with Entergy

officials on June 26, 1998, and with the Superintendent on February 27, 1998.

NRC Regional Administrator Ellis Merschoff said in a letter to River Bend Station Vice

President Randall K. Edington, “The NRC must be able to rely on licensee managers providing

complete and accurate information on matters involving compliance with requirements. A willful

violation of [NRC regulations] involving a licensee manager can result in a Severity

Level I violation . . . In consideration of the relatively low safety significance of the underlying

issue . . . and in consideration of the individual’s position within the company, the violation has

been classified at Severity Level III.”

The NRC employs a four-level scale to rate the severity of violations, with Level I being

the most serious.

The NRC also has issued a Severity Level III Notice of Violation, with no civil penalty, to

the Superintendent of Radiation Control. In his letter to the superintendent Mr. Merschoff said,

“The integrity of licensee managers is a matter that the NRC views as particularly important.”
Entergy has 30 days to respond in writing to the NRC’s Notice of Violation. The

response must document specific actions to prevent recurrence of the violation. During this

time the company may pay the fine or file a protest.

###
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-219 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, December 8, 1998)

NRC MAKES AVAILABLE STAFF DRAFT

YEAR 2000 CONTINGENCY PLAN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is making available a draft “Contingency Plan for

the Year 2000 Issue in the Nuclear Industry.”

The NRC is working with its licensees to ensure that their potential Year 2000 (Y2K)

issues have been identified and corrected and that the agency’s own computer-based systems

will continue to function properly during the transition from 1999 into 2000.

Nuclear power plant licensees indicate no significant Year 2000 problems with computer

systems required for safe operation or shutdown of plants, since most are controlled by analog

equipment that does not use computers. However, other non-safety computer systems used in

such areas as control room displays, radiation monitoring and security functions may have

potential problems. For this reason, the NRC is developing a contingency plan for ensuring that

public health and safety and the environment will continue to be protected, even if unforeseen

Y2K problems occur.

The draft plan, built around a reasonably conservative planning scenario, would

establish NRC expectations for staff coordination with external stakeholders and staff actions to

be taken beginning December 31, 1999.

The plan was developed by an NRC task force made up of seven agency employees

and chaired by Joseph G. Giitter, Office for Evaluation and Analysis of Operational Data. The

Commission is currently reviewing the draft.

A copy of the draft contingency plan is available for review in the NRC Public Document

Room, 2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20555, and electronically on the NRC’s Internet

web page at http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/Y2K/Y2KCP.html. A copy may also be ordered from

Joseph G. Giitter, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office for Evaluation and Analysis of

Operational Data, Washington, D.C. 20555; telephone: 301/415-7485.

###
### §§830 to 837. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–300, title I, §184(a)(1), Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1357

Section 830, Pub. L. 93–203, title I, §128, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1947, authorized the Secretary to accept and utilize services and property in the furtherance of the purposes of this chapter.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former section 987 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 831, Pub. L. 93–203, title I, §129, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1947, provided the Secretary with additional authorization to utilize various services and facilities of Federal, State, and local agencies and public and private organizations in the performance of functions under this chapter.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former section 988 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 832, Pub. L. 93–203, title I, §130, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1948, related to interstate agreements to facilitate compliance with the provisions of this chapter.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former section 989 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 833, Pub. L. 93–203, title I, §131, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1948, prohibited financial assistance for programs under this chapter involving political activities.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former section 990 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 834, Pub. L. 93–203, title I, §132, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1948, related to prohibition of, and sanctions against, discrimination under this chapter.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former section 991 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 835, Pub. L. 93–203, title I, §133, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1949, related to records, audits, and investigations of recipients of funds under this chapter.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former section 992 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 836, Pub. L. 93–203, title I, §134, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1949, related to bonding of those who handle funds or other financial assistance received under this chapter.

Section 837, Pub. L. 93–203, title I, §135, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1950, related to establishment of an Office of Management Assistance, the assignment of accountants, management specialists, and other professionals to such office, and reimbursement for services of such office.
### §§21 to 25. Repealed. July 22, 1932, ch. 524, 47 Stat. 741

Section 21, act June 29, 1886, ch. 567, §1, 24 Stat. 86, defined a National Trade Union for purposes of this chapter.

Section 22, act June 29, 1886, ch. 567, §2, 24 Stat. 86, related to rights of a National Trade Union upon incorporation in the office of the recorder of the District of Columbia.

Section 23, act June 29, 1886, ch. 567, §3, 24 Stat. 86, related to power of an incorporated National Trade Union to establish and amend its own constitution, rules, and by-laws.

Section 24, act June 29, 1886, ch. 567, §4, 24 Stat. 86, related to power of an incorporated National Trade Union to establish and grant powers to its own officers.

Section 25, act June 29, 1886, ch. 567, §5, 24 Stat. 86, related to establishment of a headquarters of a National Trade Union in District of Columbia.
[Exhibit 32.1]

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Med Gen, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Jack Chien,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

    (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
             13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
             all material respects, the financial condition and result of
             operations of the Company.





                                /s/ Jack Chien
                                -----------------------
                                Jack Chien,
                                Chief Financial Officer



May 23, 2005



<PAGE>
458 P.2d 859

#### Kathleen E. BROCK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Winnie HARKINS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 8910.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Sept. 17, 1969.

Ordered that application for writ of certioari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 300, 80 N.M. 596, 458 P.2d 848, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
No: I-24-005 April 1, 2024 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC Names New Resident Inspector at Millstone Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Dominic 

Antonangeli as the new resident inspector at Millstone Station in 

Waterford, Connecticut. He joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Justin 

Fuller and Resident Inspector Earl Bousquet at the two-unit site operated 

by Dominion Nuclear. 

“Dominic’s training and education make him a good fit at 

Millstone,” said NRC Region I Administrator Ray Lorson. “I’m confident 

this talented team of inspectors will ensure the plant continues to operate 

safely and in accordance with our regulations.” 

Antonangeli joined the NRC in 2019 as a health physics inspector in our Region IV Office 

in Arlington, Texas. In addition to completing health physics and radiation protection inspections at 

nuclear power plants, he has also completed a rigorous inspector qualification program and was the 

acting resident inspector at the Comanche Peak nuclear plant in Texas.

He graduated from the University of Massachusetts Lowell with a bachelor’s degree in 

physics and a master’s in radiological sciences and protection. While at UMass, he was an NRClicensed reactor operator and senior reactor operator on the university’s research and test reactor. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as 

the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects 

and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can serve up to seven years at 

a reactor site.
§ 19.215 Membership practices of certain organizations. ( a ) *Social fraternities and sororities.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to the membership practices of social fraternities and sororities that are exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. 501(a), the active membership of which consists primarily of students in attendance at institutions of higher education.
( b ) *YMCA, YWCA, Girl Scouts, Boy Scouts, and Camp Fire Girls.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to the membership practices of the Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA), the Young Women's Christian Association (YWCA), the Girl Scouts, the Boy Scouts, and Camp Fire Girls.
( c ) *Voluntary youth service organizations.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to the membership practices of a voluntary youth service organization that is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. 501(a), and the membership of which has been traditionally limited to members of one sex and principally to persons of less than nineteen years of age.
Case 0:20-cv-61386-UU   Document 16-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/16/2020   Page 1 of 1