alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStudy of several factors affecting crew escape trajectories from the Space Shuttle Orbiter at low-subsonic speedsFactors affecting the bailout characteristics from the space shuttle orbiter at low-subsonic speeds were investigated. In the 12-foot low-speed tunnel and the 4 by 7-meter tunnel with 0.03-scale models. The effect of crew-model exit velocity, body position, and body weight were studied with egress from the main side hatch with the orbiter upright and from the upper cabin hatch with the orbiter inverted. Crew model drag and flow field measurements around the orbiter were estimated. The high-angle-of-attack trim characteristics of the orbiter was determined by force tests in an attempt to improve bailout conditions. A computer simulation was made to evaluate the maneuver necessary to attain the high-angle-of-attack trim.Document ID19850010698Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsScallion, W. I.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Spencer, B., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Ware, G. M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Phillips, W. P.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Powell, R. W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Young, J. C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Gentry, G. L., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Applin, Z. T.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1985Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberL-15839NAS 1.15:86303NASA-TM-86303Accession Number85N19008Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-51-13-07Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850010698.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
November 1, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark L. Lemond, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

|Date:December 11, 2008 | By:/s/ Mark L.
      Lemond
|---------------------- | ---------------------------
|                       | Mark L. Lemond             
|                       | President and              
|                       | Chief Executive Officer    

---
§ 206.66 Limitation on expenditures. Total assistance provided in any given emergency declaration may not exceed $5,000,000, except when it is determined by the Administrator that: ( a ) Continued emergency assistance is immediately required;
( b ) There is a continuing and immediate risk to lives, property, public health and safety; and
( c ) Necessary assistance will not otherwise be provided on a timely basis.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________

)

SCOTT J. BRODIE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 10-0544 (PLF)

)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH )

AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., )

) 

Defendants. )

__________________________________________)

ORDER

For the reasons given in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that [2] plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED;

and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint report proposing an

expedited schedule for the filing of the administrative record and the briefing of dispositive

motions on or before June 11, 2010.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/________________________

 PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Court

DATE: June 4, 2010
Exhibit 10.29
  
 Agreement Date of Grant Company Participant
 R E C I T A L S
 Plan
 RSUs
  Grant of the RSUs
 Vesting/Form and Timing of Issuance or Transfer
 Scheduled Vesting Date
  Liquidity Event Vesting
Date




---



##### 



Vesting Date provided
      provided




---



##### 



No Right to Continued Employment
 No Rights of a Shareholder
 Certificates




---



##### 



Transferability
 Withholding
 Securities Laws
 Notices
 Choice of Law THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICTS OF LAWS
 RSUs and Shares Subject to Plan and Stockholders Agreement
 Signature in Counterparts




---



##### 



VANGUARD HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.By:Agreed and acknowledged asof the date first above written:
### §3008. Proceedings before United States magistrate judges

A district court of the United States may assign its duties in proceedings under this chapter to a United States magistrate judge to the extent not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVI, §3611, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4937; amended Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States magistrate judges" substituted for "United States magistrates" in catchline and "United States magistrate judge" substituted for "United States magistrate" in text pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Nov. 29, 1990, and applicable with respect to certain actions for debts owed the United States pending in court on that effective date, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101–647, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.
SUBSIDIARIES OF EXCEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.



The following is a list of the Company's subsidiaries as of March 23, 1998:



Name of Subsidiary                     State of Incorporation
------------------                     ----------------------

Excel Communications, Inc.                   Delaware
ExcelCom, Inc.                               Delaware
First Excel, FSB                             Federal Savings Bank
Excel Telephone, Inc.                        Delaware
Excel Management Service, Inc.               Delaware
Excel Communications Marketing, Inc.         Delaware
Excel Products, Inc.                         Delaware
Excel Fulfillment Services, Inc.             Delaware
Excel Teleservices, Inc.                     Delaware
Excel Switch Facility, Inc.                  Delaware
Excel Telecommunications Inc.                Texas
Excel Telecommunications Inc. of Virginia    Virginia


Telco Communcations Group, Inc.              Virginia
Telco Holdings, Inc.                         Delaware
Prime Business Communications, Inc.          Delaware
Telco Network Services, Inc.                 Nevada
Telco Billing, Inc.                          Delaware
Long Distance Wholesale Club, Inc.           Delaware
Telco Switch Acquisition Inc.                Nevada
Telco Switch Corp.                           Delaware
Network Control Services, Inc.               Delaware
Telco Voice Network Inc.                     Nevada
Telco Switch Limited Partnership             Nevada Limited Partnership
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or vld@nrc.gov

I-96-29

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Victor Dricks May 7, 1996

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE

WITH NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a predecisional

enforcement conference Friday (May 10) with Niagara Mohawk Power

Corp. (NMPC) to discuss its handling of the termination of an

engineer at the Nine Mile Point Unit 2 facility near Oswego, N.Y.

The meeting follows a recommended decision on March 15 by a

U.S. Department of Labor Administrative Law Judge in favor of a

former independent safety engineering group engineer. The

engineer, claiming he was the subject of unlawful discrimination,

filed a Department of Labor complaint after NMPC terminated his

employment in February 1994. The engineer alleged that his

termination was in retaliation for his bringing safety-related

concerns to the attention of the company's senior management.

NRC regulations prohibit discrimination of individuals who raise

safety concerns.

The decision to hold a pre-decisional enforcement conference

does not mean that the NRC has determined that a violation has

occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the

purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; and to enable the licensee to outline its

proposed corrective actions. No decision on the apparent

violations will be made at this conference. Those decisions will

be made by senior NRC officials at a later time.

The meeting, which is open to public observation, will be

held at 1 p.m. at the NRC Region I Office in King of Prussia, Pa.

***
§ 295.34 Reopening a claim. ( a ) The Director of OCGFC may reopen a claim if requested to do so by the Claimant, notwithstanding the submission of the Release and Certification Form, for the limited purpose of considering issues raised by the request to reopen if: ( 1 ) The Claimant desires mitigation compensation and the request to reopen is filed not later than August 28, 2003 in accordance with § 295.21(d) or (h); or
( 2 ) The Claimant closed the sale of real property not later than August 28, 2002 and wishes to present a claim for reduction in the value of the real property under § 295.21(e) and the request to reopen is filed not later than August 28, 2002; or
( 3 ) The Claimant has incurred Replacement Costs under § 295.21(d) in excess of those previously awarded and is not prohibited by the terms of an agreement pertaining to home replacement with OCGFC from requesting that the case be reopened; or
( 4 ) The Director of OCGFC otherwise determines that Claimant has demonstrated good cause.
( b ) The Director of OCGFC may establish a deadline by which requests to reopen under paragraphs (a)(3) or (4) of this section must be submitted. The deadline will be published as a notice in the Federal Register and broadly disseminated throughout the communities, pueblos and Indian reservations in Los Alamos, Rio Arriba, Sandoval, and Santa Fe Counties.
#### § 208.38 Reimbursement for re-supply and logistics costs incurred during Activation.

With the exception of emergency procurement authorized in the Activation Order, and replacement of consumable items provided for in § 208.43(a)(2) of this subpart, DHS will not reimburse costs incurred for re-supply and logistical support during Activation. Re-supply and logistical support of Task Forces needed during Activation are the responsibility of the Joint Management Team.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-171 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, November 27, 1996

NOTE TO EDITORS: NRC CHAIRMAN TO ANNOUNCE MAJOR REORGANIZATION

NRC Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson will announce a major

reorganization of the agency Monday (Dec. 2).

She will address the staff on closed-circuit television at

1:30 p.m. (EST), and will conduct a press conference immediately

thereafter in the auditorium of the Two White Flint Building at

11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md.

Reporters who wish to cover the announcement and press

conference are asked to notify the NRC Office of Public Affairs

in advance and to be at the auditorium no later than 1:20 p. m.

Special seating will be set aside for news organizations. News

crews needing to make parking arrangements are also asked to call

in advance.

NRC's offices are at the intersection of Rockville Pike and

Marinelli Road near the White Flint station of the Washington

Metro Red Line.

###
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-40 April 14, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC STAFF ISSUES LATEST ASSESSMENT OF PERFORMANCE AT GINNA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance remains

acceptable in the NRC’s latest plant performance review at the Ginna Nuclear Power Plant near

Rochester, N.Y. The plant is operated by Rochester Gas & Electric Company (RG&E).

The review assesses performance at Ginna from April 1998 through January 1999.

In a letter to RG&E summarizing the results, NRC Region I official G. Scott Barber said,

Ginna “has had an excellent operational run,” operating at near full rated power for 421 days.

Mr. Barber said the plant was operated with a “safety-conscious and conservative

approach to the execution of plant activities to minimize operational and personnel risk.” Mr.

Barber also said plant material condition was good and operators responded well to the few

equipment problems that did occur.

He said engineering performance improved and plant modifications were “generally well

developed and implemented.” Followup evaluations (root cause evaluations) were not thorough

in a few cases of events involving interdepartmental communications issues. Plant support

activities, such as radiological controls, security and emergency planning were effective.

In addition to the normal inspection program, an operational safeguards response

evaluation will also be conducted. This inspection is part of a national program to assess

security at all commercial reactor sites.

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region I Office

of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power plant in

the nation. These reviews, called plant performance reviews (PPRs), give the agency staff an

integrated assessment of plant performance and provide a basis for planning inspection

activities.

Plant performance reviews are an interim measure NRC is utilizing to monitor nuclear

power plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after suspending the

Systematic Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a new oversight and

assessment program is developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every 12 to 24

months.
The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will provide

quarterly performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators and on inspection

findings. This program will be tested at eight sites beginning in June and will be extended to all

plants next January. A full description of the new program is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

#
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                     109,137
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,508
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,940
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           216,634
<PP&E>                                     169,148
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,263,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       43,668
<BONDS>                                    700,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (12,031)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,263,734
<SALES>                                     12,677
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           197,329
<CGS>                                       23,710
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              152,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (19)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          77,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (34,681)
<INCOME-TAX>                                12,831
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (21,850)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (25,344)
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (47,194)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        7,421,000
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 4,103,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  1,725,000
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             10,667,000
<PP&E>                                        3,102,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                2,100,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               12,626,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         6,766,000
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        116,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    5,244,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 12,626,000
<SALES>                                       4,173,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              4,173,000
<CGS>                                         2,836,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 2,836,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              2,190,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (5,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (411,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (411,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (411,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.04)




</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 8, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), NSF International (“NSF”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: NSF International, Ann Arbor, MI. The nature and scope of NSF's standards development activities are: public health safety and environmental standards including, but not limited to: food additives and contaminants (chemical and microbiological), commercial and household food service equipment (powered, preparation, storage, and service products), food processing equipment; water quality and treatment, drinking water additives, drinking water treatment systems, commercial bottled water, home treatment devices, beverage treatment technologies; plumbing products, plastic pipe; recreational water standards, swimming pool, spa, and hot tubs and related equipment; waste water treatment systems (small, commercial, and home treatment systems and technologies), biosolids quality and treatment, waste water additives; air quality, product emissions and filtration equipment; and related management system standards.

Additional information concerning NSF may be obtained from Jane Wilson, Manager, Standards, NSF International at (734) 827-6835.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-23508  Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M