Order 2011-9-8

Served: September 14, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 14th day of September, 2011

Application of

 JET-A LLC

For a certificate of public convenience and necessity 

under 49 U.S.C. § 41102 to engage in interstate charter 

air transportation of persons, property, and mail

Dockets DOT-OST-2010-0120

 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

PROPOSING ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE

Summary

By this order, we tentatively conclude that Jet-A, LLC (“Jet-A”), is a citizen of the United States

and is fit, willing, and able to provide interstate charter air transportation of persons, property, 

and mail, and should be issued a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing such 

operations, subject to conditions.

Background

Section 41102 of Title 49 of the United States Code (“the Transportation Code”) directs us to 

determine that applicants for certificate authority to provide interstate charter air transportation 

of persons, property and mail are “fit, willing, and able” to perform such transportation and to 

ensure that all operations relating to this authority conform to the provisions of the 

Transportation Code and the regulations and requirements of the Department. In making fitness 

findings, the Department uses a three-part test that reconciles the Airline Deregulation Act’s 

liberal entry policy with Congress’ concern for operational safety and consumer protection. The 

three areas of inquiry that must be addressed in order to determine a company’s fitness are 

whether the applicant (1) will have the managerial skills and technical ability to conduct the 

proposed operations, (2) will have access to resources sufficient to commence operations without 

posing an undue risk to consumers, and (3) will comply with the Transportation Code and 

regulations imposed by Federal and State agencies. We must also find that the applicant is a 

U.S. citizen.

On May 6, 2010, Jet-A filed an application in Docket DOT-OST-2010-0120, requesting a 

certificate issued under 49 U.S.C. 41102 authorizing it to provide interstate charter air 

transportation of persons, property, and mail. Jet-A accompanied its application with
2

information required by section 204.3 of our regulations for an examination of its fitness to hold 

such authority.1

We have received no answers to the application and no special issues regarding the applicant 

have come to our attention. Under these circumstances, we propose to decide the issue of 

Jet-A’s fitness on the basis of the written record. As discussed below, we tentatively conclude 

that Jet-A is a U.S. citizen and is fit, willing, and able to operate its proposed air service, subject 

to conditions. However, we will give interested persons an opportunity to show cause why we 

should not adopt as final these tentative findings and conclusions.

FITNESS

The Applicant

Jet-A, based in Allentown, Pennsylvania, was formed under the laws of the State of New Jersey 

on June 14, 2007, as a limited liability company. The company is owned by Dr. Robert J. Hariri

(50 percent) and Shearson International Corporation (50 percent).

2

 Jet-A currently holds a Part 

135 Air Carrier Certificate issued from the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) and is 

registered as an on-demand air taxi operator under Part 298 of our rules (14 CFR Part 298). The 

air carrier currently operates one Canadair CL-600 Challenger aircraft and, if certificated, intends 

to add one large B-737-200 aircraft configured with 30 seats to its fleet for use in charter

operations.3

Managerial Competence 

Jet A’s management and key technical personnel consist of the following individuals. Each has

certified they hold U.S. citizenship.

Robert J. Hariri President and Founding Partner

Ronald A. Boros Vice President, Managing Director, Director of Operations

Jeffrey D. Barnes Director of Maintenance

Albert Murrer IV Chief Pilot

Gerald E. Sykes Chief Inspector

Dr. Robert J. Hariri, the air carrier’s President and Founding Partner, is the Chief Executive 

Officer (“CEO”) of Celgene Cellular Therapeutics (2005-present), where he also served as its 

President (2002-2005). Prior to that, he was the Founder, Chairman, and Chief Science Officer

 

1

Jet-A filed additional information supplementing its applications on September 15, 2010, and April 5, June 14, 

and July 5, 2011.

2

Shearson International Corp. is a California “S” corporation solely owned by Mr. Ronald A. Boros, Director of 

Operations and Co-Founder of Jet-A. 

3 As an air taxi operator, Jet-A’s operations are limited to the use of small aircraft (i.e., aircraft originally 

designed to have a maximum passenger capacity of 60 seats or less and a maximum payload capacity of 18,000 

pounds or less). Operations using large aircraft (i.e., aircraft originally designed to have a maximum passenger 

capacity of more than 60 seats or a maximum payload capacity of more than 18,000 pound) require certificate 

authority.
3

(“CSO”) at Anthrogenesis Corporation/Lifebank, Inc. (1998-2002), the Co-Founder, Vice 

Chairman, and CSO at Neurodynamics, Inc. (1987-1994), and an Advisor with Forest 

Laboratories, Inc. (1992-1995). Dr. Hariri is also a Captain and General Surgeon with the New 

York Army Guard and is a licensed Commercial Pilot.

Mr. Ronald A. Boros, an Airline Transport Pilot, has served as Jet-A’s Vice President and 

Director of Operations since 2007. Prior to founding Jet-A, he was employed by several 

different companies where he held various aviation related positions, including Chief Pilot, 

President, and CEO of Shearson Aviation (1999-2007); First Officer with Alaska Airlines

(November 2000-April 2002); and Flight Officer with Air Canada (December 1997-May 1999). 

Additionally, he has been an Airline Captain with Bombardier/Canadair (May 1996-December 

1997), JMI Aviation (March 1993-May 1996), and Commodore Computer (July 1989-March 

1993). Mr. Boros is also the Owner and Managing Member of Eagle’s Ridge Ranch, a 120-acre 

avocado and citrus farm (June 2003-present) and Founder, Director, and Trustee of The 

Wellbeck Foundation (October 2004-present).

Mr. Jeffery D. Barnes has been Jet-A’s Director of Maintenance since August 2010. He holds a 

Commercial Pilot License and an Airframe and Powerplant certificate. Prior to joining Jet-A, 

Mr. Barnes was employed as Director of Maintenance and a B737-400 First Officer for CSC 

Transport (January 2005-August 2010). He was also employed as a Flight Engineer and 

Aviation Maintenance Technician with Business Aerotech (December 1996-December 2004),

and was a Maintenance Systems Lead with B.F. Goodrich Aerospace (August 1993-December 

1996). Mr. Barnes also served in the United States Air Force as a RC-135 Crew Chief and 

Weapons System Controller (June 1980-October 1992).

Mr. Albert Murrer IV is Jet-A’s Chief Pilot, a position he has held since December 2008. A 

certified Airline Transport Pilot, he was employed as an Airline Captain with Quest Diagnostic 

(April 1999-April 2010) and General Aviation Flying Service, Inc. (July 2008-April 2010). He 

also was employed by Virgin America as a First Officer (January 2008-July 2008), with Omni 

Air International as an Airline Captain (March 2005-January 2008) and with Atlantic Southeast 

Airlines as a First Officer (August 2001-March 2005). Mr. Murrer is type rated on DC-10, 

Airbus 320, and Challenger 600 aircraft. 

Mr. Gerald E. Sykes has been Jet-A’s Chief Inspector since December 2008. A licensed 

Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic, Mr. Sykes has held various aviation maintenance positions,

including Heavy Structure Technician for Total Aircraft Services (August 2009-January 2010), 

Maintenance Crew Chief for New World Jet/Jet Aviation Business Jets (April 2006-July 2008), 

Maintenance Supervisor for Jet Aviation (October 2005-March 2006), Aircraft Mechanic for 

Bombardier Aerospace (January 1997-September 2005), Assistant Aircraft Mechanic for New 

England Aero Services, Inc. (September 1995-February 1999), and Aeronautical Repairman in 

the U.S. Air Force Reserve (July 1991-February 1997). Mr. Sykes also served as an aviation 

structural mechanic with the U.S. Navy (July 1985-July 1989). He is also the President of Sykes 

Company (August 2008-present).

In view of the experience and background of the applicant’s key personnel, we tentatively 

conclude that Jet-A has demonstrated that it has key management and technical personnel who 

have the managerial skills and technical ability to support its proposed operations. Additionally, 
4

the FAA has advised us that Jet-A’s key technical personnel have been approved by that agency 

to hold their positions,

4

the air carrier has conducted its current operations satisfactorily, and it 

has no objection to the Department’s approval of Jet-A’s application for certificate authority.

Operating Plan and Financial Position

As previously noted, Jet-A currently provides on-demand charter air transportation with one 

Canadair Challenger aircraft operated under Part 135 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

(“FAR”s) and Part 298 of our regulations. The applicant states that it has identified a demand for 

charter services using executive configured large aircraft, similar to the service it currently 

provides with its smaller jet aircraft, and has entered into a lease agreement with IDM Corporate 

Aviation Service, LLC (“IDM”),

5

for the use of an executive class Boeing 737-200 configured 

with 30 seats. Under the lease agreement, IDM will prepay, monthly, the fixed costs associated 

with the aircraft and pay an administration fee to Jet-A for managing the aircraft. In turn, Jet-A

will perform all management functions associated with maintaining and operating the aircraft 

and will share revenues with IDM that it receives from third-party charters.

Historical financial statements submitted in support of Jet-A’s fitness show that for the calendar 

year ending 2008, Jet-A earned net income of $103,476 on approximately $1.48 million in 

operating revenues; for the calendar year ending 2009, Jet-A earned net income of $97,881 on 

approximately $801,391 in operating revenues; and for the calendar year ending 2010, the air 

carrier recorded a loss of $81,762 on operating revenues of $732,048 due to a decrease in charter 

sales. However, for the 6 months ended June 2011, Jet-A earned net income of $79,058 on

operating revenues of $636,087. Jet-A’s most recent balance sheet indicates that as of June 28, 

2011, it had current assets of $1.40 million and current liabilities of $79,577, giving the company 

a positive working capital balance of $1.32 million.

 

To meet the Department’s financial fitness criteria, an applicant should have access to financial 

resources sufficient to cover its pre-operating expenses and the expenses that are reasonably

projected to be incurred during three months of “normal” operations.6 Jet-A provided the

Department with a financial forecast for its first year of operations with its Boeing 737-200 and

projects that its total operating expense for its first year of charter operations with this aircraft 

will be approximately $4.49 million. 

Given the nature of the air carrier’s operations, we find the applicant’s forecast to be reasonable

and estimate that Jet-A will need access to $1.12 million7in funding to meet our financial fitness 

 

4 Before authorizing an air carrier to conduct air transportation operations, the FAA evaluates the qualifications 

of persons holding certain positions with respect to the minimum qualifications for those positions as prescribed in 

the Federal Aviation Regulations. The FAA’s evaluation of these key personnel provides an added practical and inperson test of their skills and technical ability. 

5

Jet-A states that IDM is a Texas limited liability corporation.

6

Because projected expenses during the first several months of air transportation services frequently do not 

include all costs that will be incurred during a “normal” period of operations, it is our practice to base our threemonth test on an average of one-quarter of the first year’s operating cost forecast. 

7

The $1.12 million noted here is one-quarter of the applicant’s forecast of approximately $4.49 million in first

year expenses.
5

test. In support of its ability to meet our financial fitness requirements, the air carrier provided 

third-party verification from its Morgan Stanley Smith Barney account dated June 27, 2011,

confirming that it has maintained account deposits in excess of the amount required by the 

Department.

In light of the above, we tentatively conclude that Jet-A will have access to sufficient financial 

resources to commence the operations it proposes without posing an undue risk to consumers or 

their funds.8

Compliance Disposition

The applicant states that there are no other actions or outstanding judgments against it, its 

owners, or its key personnel nor have there been any charges of unfair, deceptive or anticompetitive business practices, or of fraud, felony or antitrust violations brought against any of 

these parties in the past ten years. The applicant also states that there are no pending 

investigations, enforcement actions, or formal complaints filed by the Department against it, its 

key personnel, or persons having a substantial interest in it with respect to compliance with the 

Transportation Code or the Department’s regulations.

A review of our records and other information available to us has uncovered no information 

which would reflect negatively on the applicant or any of its key personnel. In addition, 

according to the FAA, the air carrier has conducted its operations satisfactorily and the agency 

knows of no reason why the air carrier should not be granted the authority it is seeking. 

Moreover, the applicant notes that neither it nor any of its key personnel have been involved in 

an accident or incident in the year preceding its application or at any time in the past which 

remains under investigation by the FAA, the NTSB, or the company itself.

In light of these circumstances, we tentatively find that Jet-A has the proper regard for the laws 

and regulations governing its services to ensure that its aircraft and personnel conform to 

applicable safety standards and that acceptable consumer relations practices will be followed.

CITIZENSHIP

Section 41102 of the Transportation Code requires that authority to engage in air transportation 

be held only by citizens of the United States as defined in 49 U.S.C. § 40102(a)(15). That 

section also requires that the president and two-thirds of the Board of Directors and other 

managing officers be U.S. citizens, that at least 75 percent of the voting interest be owned by 

U.S. citizens, and that the air carrier must be under the actual control of U.S. citizens.

As noted earlier, Jet-A is organized under the laws of the state of New Jersey, as a limited 

liability company. Dr. Robert J. Hariri, its President, is a U.S. citizen and owns 50 percent of the 

air carrier, with Shearson International Corporation owning the remaining 50 percent. 

Mr. Ronald Boros, a U.S. citizen, owns 100 percent of Shearson International Corporation. In 

 

8 As is our practice, prior to making any authority awarded to Jet-A effective, we will require the company to 

demonstrate that it continues to have access to the financial resources needed to meet our financial test. 
6

addition, Jet-A has submitted an affidavit attesting that it is a U.S. citizen. Finally, there is no 

other information before us that would lead us to conclude that Jet-A is not controlled by U.S. 

citizens.

In light of the foregoing, we tentatively find that Jet-A is owned and actually controlled by U.S. 

citizens, consistent with 49 U.S.C. § 40102(a)(15) and is fit, willing, and able to provide the 

proposed scheduled passenger operations, subject to conditions.

OBJECTIONS

We will give interested persons 14 days following the service date of this order to show cause 

why the tentative findings and conclusions set forth here should not be made final; answers to 

objections will be due within 7 days thereafter. We expect such persons to direct their 

objections, if any, to the applications and points at issue and to support such objections with 

detailed economic analyses. If an oral evidentiary hearing or discovery procedures are 

requested, the objector should state in detail why such a hearing or discovery is considered 

necessary, and what material issues of decisional fact the objector would expect to establish 

through a hearing or discovery that cannot be established in written pleadings. The objector 

should consider whether discovery procedures alone would be sufficient to resolve material 

issues of decisional fact. If so, the type of procedure should be specified (See Part 302, Rules 19 

and 20); if not, the reasons why not should be explained. We will not entertain general, vague, 

or unsupported objections. If no substantive objections are filed, we will issue an order that will 

make final our tentative findings and conclusions with respect to Jet-A’s fitness and certification.

EFFECTIVE CERTIFICATE CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS

If Jet-A is found fit and issued the certificate it seeks, its authority will not become effective until 

the air carrier has fulfilled all of the requirements for effectiveness as set forth in the terms and 

conditions attached to its certificate. Among other things, this includes (1) our receipt of 

evidence of Jet-A’s authority from the FAA authorizing such operations, (2) evidence of liability 

insurance coverage that meets the requirements of section 205.5(b) of our rules, (3) a statement 

of changes it may have undergone since its fitness was examined, and (4) evidence that Jet-A

continues to have adequate financial resources available to it.

We also wish to remind Jet-A of the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 41110(e). Specifically, that 

section requires that, once an air carrier is found fit initially, it must remain fit in order to hold its 

authority. To be assured that certificated air carriers continue to be fit after effective authority 

has been issued to them, we require that they supply information describing any subsequent 

substantial changes they may undergo in areas affecting fitness. Therefore, if Jet-A is issued 

effective certificate authority and subsequently proposes substantial changes in its ownership, 

management, or operations, it must first comply with the requirements of section 204.5 of our 

rules.9 

 

9 The air carrier may contact our Air Carrier Fitness Division to report proposed substantial changes in its 

operations, ownership, or management, and to determine what additional information, if any, will be required under 

section 204.5. In addition, by notice dated July 21, 1998, the Department requested air carriers to provide a 30-day 

advance notification of any proposed change in ownership, restructuring, or recapitalization. If the air carrier fails to 

(--footnote continued on next page--)
7

Moreover, as discussed in the FITNESS section of this order, our tentative finding of fitness for 

Jet-A is based on the operating plans described in its application, namely, performing passenger 

charter air transportation with one large aircraft.10 Were the applicant to propose to expand its 

operations to include additional large aircraft, our fitness findings might no longer apply. 

Therefore, should Jet-A desire to operate additional large aircraft, it must first provide the 

Department with at least 45-days advance notice of such plans and provide updated information 

establishing its fitness for such expansion. The compliance of the company with this 

requirement is essential if we are to carry out our responsibilities under section 41110(e).11

Finally, if Jet-A is granted effective authority, it would be required to submit a detailed progress 

report, within 45 days following the end of the first year of certificated flight operations, to the 

Air Carrier Fitness Division. The submission of a first year progress report is conditioned upon 

all newly certificated air carriers and was adopted as policy by the Department to aid in 

monitoring the fitness of new air carriers. The report should include a description of the air 

carrier’s current operations (number and type of aircraft, principle markets served, total number 

of full-time employees), a summary of how its operations have changed during the year, a 

discussion of any changes it anticipates from its current operations during its second year, 

current financial statements,12 and a listing of current senior management and key technical 

personnel. The air carrier should also be prepared to meet with staff members of the Fitness 

Division to discuss its current and future operations.

ACCORDINGLY,

1. We direct all interested persons to show cause why we should not issue an order making 

final our tentative findings and conclusions stated above and award a certificate to Jet-A, LLC, 

authorizing it to engage in interstate charter air transportation of persons, property and mail using 

one large aircraft, subject to the attached specimen Terms, Conditions, and Limitations.

2. We direct that should Jet-A, LLC want to operate more than one large aircraft, it must 

first provide the Department with at least 45 days’ notice and demonstrate its fitness for such 

operations.

 

file this updated information or if the information fails to demonstrate that the air carrier will continue to be fit upon 

implementation of the substantial change, the Department may take such action as is appropriate, including 

enforcement action or steps to modify, suspend, or revoke the air carrier's certificate authority.

10 This limitation does not apply to the air carrier’s small aircraft operations and, as a result, Jet-A remains free to 

conduct charter operations with as many small aircraft as it desires.

11 We also remind Jet-A about the requirements of section 204.7 of our rules. This section provides, among other 

things, that (1) the certificate authority granted to a company shall be revoked if the company does not commence 

actual flying operations under that authority within one year of the date of the Department's determination of its 

fitness; (2) if the company commences operations for which it was found fit and subsequently ceases such 

operations, it may not resume operations unless its fitness has been redetermined; and (3) if the company does not 

resume operations within one year of its cessation, its authority shall be revoked for dormancy.

12 These financial statements should include a balance sheet as of the end of the company’s first full year of 

certificated flight operations and a 12-month income statement ending that same date.
8

3. We direct any interested persons having objections to the issuance of the order making 

final any of the proposed findings, conclusions, or the certificate awards set forth here to file 

such objections with the Department of Transportation Dockets, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E., 

West Building Ground Floor, Rm. W12-140, Washington, D.C. 20590, in Docket DOT-OST2010-0120 and serve them upon all persons listed in Attachment A no later than 14 days after the 

service date of this order; answers to objections shall be filed no later than 7 days thereafter.

4. If timely and properly supported objections are filed, we will accord full consideration to the 

matters or issues raised by the objections before we take further action.13

5. In the event that no objections are filed, we will consider all further procedural steps to be 

waived and we will enter orders making final our tentative findings and conclusions.

6. We will serve a copy of this order on the persons listed in Attachment A.

7. We will publish a notice of this order in the Federal Register.

By:

SUSAN L. KURLAND

Assistant Secretary

for Aviation and International Affairs

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.gov

 

13 Since we have provided for the filing of objections to this order, we will not entertain petitions for 

reconsideration.
Attachment

Specimen

Terms, Conditions, and Limitations

JET-A, LLC

is authorized to engage in interstate charter air transportation of persons, property and mail 

between any point in any State, territory, or possession of the United States or the District of 

Columbia, and any other point in any of those entities.

This authority is subject to the following provisions:

(1) The authority to operate under this certificate will not become effective until six 

(business) days after the Department has received the following documents; provided, however, 

that the Department may stay the effectiveness of this authority at any time prior to that date:

(a) A copy of the holder's Air Carrier Certificate and Operations Specifications 

authorizing such operations from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

(b) A certificate of insurance on OST Form 6410 evidencing liability insurance 

coverage meeting the requirements of 14 CFR 205.5(b) for all of its aircraft.

(c) A statement of any changes the holder has undergone in its ownership, key 

personnel, operating plans, financial posture, or compliance history, since the date of the 

Show Cause Order in this case.

(d) A revised list of pre-operating expenses already paid and those remaining to be 

paid, as well as independent verification that the holder has available to it funds 

sufficient to cover any remaining pre-operating expenses and to provide a working 

capital reserve equal to the operating costs that would be incurred in three months of 

operations.

(2) Pending receipt of effective authority, the holder may not accept payment of any kind 

(i.e., cash, check, or credit card), issue tickets for the operations proposed under this certificate, 

or enter into contracts with charter operators, and any advertisement by the holder must 

prominently state: "This service is subject to receipt of government operating authority." 

(3) The holder shall at all times conduct its operations in accordance with the regulations 

prescribed by the Department of Transportation for the services authorized by this certificate, 

and with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and limitations as the Department of 

Transportation may prescribe in the public interest.

(4) The holder's authority under this certificate is effective only to the extent that such 

operations are also authorized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and comply with 
2

all U.S. Government requirements concerning security, including, but not limited to 49 CFR Part 

1544.



(5) The holder shall at all times remain a "Citizen of the United States" as required by 49 

U.S.C. 40102(a)(15).

(6) The holder shall maintain in effect liability insurance coverage as required under 14 

CFR Part 205. Failure to maintain such insurance coverage will render a certificate ineffective, 

and this or other failure to comply with the provisions of Subtitle VII of Title 49 of the United 

States Code or the Department's regulations shall be sufficient grounds to revoke this certificate.

(7) The holder is not authorized to engage in air transportation operations between points 

within the State of Alaska.

(8) Should the holder propose any substantial change in its ownership, management, or 

operations (as defined in 14 CFR 204.2(l)), it must first comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 

204.5.

(9) In the event that the holder does not commence actual flying operations under this 

certificate within one year of the date of the Department's determination of its fitness, its 

authority shall be revoked for dormancy, unless the holder is conducting operations under 

another type of certificate authority. Further, in the event that the holder commences operations 

for which it was found "fit, willing, and able" and subsequently ceases all such operations, its 

authority under all certificates held shall be suspended under the terms of 14 CFR 204.7 and the 

holder may neither recommence nor advertise such operations unless its fitness to do so has 

been redetermined by the Department. Moreover, if the holder does not resume operations 

within one year of its cessation, its authority shall be revoked for dormancy.

 



To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning security, the holder shall, 

before commencing any new service (including charter flights) to or from a foreign airport, contact its Principal 

Security Inspector (PSI) to advise the PSI of its plans and to find out whether the Transportation Security 

Administration has determined that security is adequate to allow such airport(s) to be served.
Attachment A

SERVICE LIST FOR JET-A, LLC

MICHAEL ORIGEL

AIRLINE CERT LLC

3812 SEPULVEDA BLVD SUITE 410

TORRANCE CA 90505

ROBERT FERENCE

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

ALLENTOWN FSDO

961 MARCON BLVD

SUITE 111

ALLENTOWN PA 18109

WILLIAM J WEBER

CERTIFICATION SECTION MANAGER

FAA AFS-900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE, SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

BERNARD STANKUS RTS-42

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

PETER LYNCH AGC-300

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR 

ENFORCEMENT

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591

ANNE SUISSA, RTS-42

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

RONALD BOROS

MANAGING DIRECTOR

JET A LLC

600 HAYDEN CIRCLE

ALLENTOWN PA 18109