T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). RA/ Res ea r ch 07- 70499 NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OSE ANG EL SANCHEZ S UA RE Z; M A RI A D EL PI LA R CA M A CH O SO LI S, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 70499 A ge nc yN os . A 075- 481- 916

A 075- 481- 917 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B e f o r e : G O O D W I N , W A L L A C E , an dF I S H E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . J os e A nge l S anc he z S uar e z and M ar i aD e l P i l arC a m a c ho S ol i s , hus band and w i f e and na t i ve s and c i t i z e ns of M e xi c o, pe t i t i on pr o s e f orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng thei r m ot i on t o reopen 

# FI LED JAN 11 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

r e mo v a l p r o c e e d i n g s . To th e e x t e n tw e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n i ti s g o v e rn e db y8 U . S. C. § 1252. W e r e vi e w f

orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n, I tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 889, 894 ( 9th C i r . 2003) and de novo c l a i m s of c o n s titu tio n a l v io la tio n s , Co lm e n a rv . I NS , 2 1 0 F .3 d9 6 7 , 9 7 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) . W e d e n yin p art an dd is m is s in p art th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to r e ope n a s unt i m e l ybe c aus e the m ot i on w a s f i l e d m or e than one y e ara f t e rthe B I A ’s f in a l o r d e ro f

r e m o v a l. See 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 2 ) . C ontr aryt o the pe t i t i one r s ’ c ont e nt i on, C ongr e s s di d notvi ol a t e the c o n s titu tio n w h e n it r e p e a le ds u s p e n s io n o f d e p o rta tio n , an dr e p la c e dit w ith cancel l at i on of re m ov alas the avai l abl e f orm of re l i ef

for a l i ens w ho w er e pl ac ed in r e m o v a l p r o c e e d in g s o n o ra f te rA p r il 1 , 1 9 9 7 . Se e V a s q u ez - Za v a la v . A s h c r o ft , 3 2 4 F .3 d1 1 0 5 , 1 1 0 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) ; H e rn a n dez -Mez q u ita v . A s h c r o ft , 293 F . 3d 11 61 , 11 63 -65 (9th C i r. 20 02 ). P e t i t i one r s ’ e qua l pr ot e c t i on c ha l l e nge t o the N i c ar a guan A dj us tm e ntand C e n tr a l A m e r ic an R e lie f A c t ( “N A C A R A ” ) is f

o r e c lo s e db yo u rd e c is io n in J im e n ez -A n g e les v . A s h c r o ft , 2 9 1 F .3 d5 9 4 , 6 0 2 -0 3 (9 th C ir. 2 0 0 2 ) ( “C o n g re ss ’s deci si on t o aff

ord m ore f

avorabl e tre atm entt o cert ai n al i ens ‘ st em s f rom a r at i on al d ip lo m a tic d e c is io n to e n c o u r a g e s u c h a lie n s to r e m a in in th e U n ite dS ta te s ’” ) .RA/ Res ea r ch 07- 70499 3 P e titio n e r s ’ du e p r o c e s s c h a lle n g e to N A C A R A a ls o f a ils . See H

ern a n dezMez q u ita v . A s h c r o

ft , 2 9 3 F . 3 d1 1 6 1 , 1 1 6 5 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 2 ) (rej ect i n g a du e p ro cess chal l enge because pet i t i on erfa i l ed t o d em on strat e thathe w as depri ved o f a qu al i fy i ng l i berty i nt er es t ). W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w the B I A ’ s Jul y22, 2005, or de rdi s m i s s i ng p e titio n e r s d ir e c t ap p e a l f r o m an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g th e ir appl i c a t i on f

orc anc e l l a t i on of

r e m ova l be c aus e thi s pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w i s not tim e lya s to th a t o r d e r . Se e S i n gh v . I NS , 3 1 5 F .3 d1 1 8 6 , 1 1 8 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . F u rth e r , w e la c kju r is d ic tio n to r e v ie w th e B I A ’s d e c is io n n o t to e x e r c is e its s u as p o n te au th o r ityto r e o p e n . Se e Eki m i a n v . I NS , 30 3 F . 3d 11 53 , 11 59 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 2 ) .P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.