alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §715. Review of applications

Applications for grants in excess of $100,000 in the aggregate authorized to be funded under this chapter, other than grants primarily for the purpose of conducting dissemination or conferences, shall be reviewed by panels of experts which shall include a majority of non-Federal members. Non-Federal members may be provided travel, per diem, and consultant fees not to exceed the daily equivalent of the rate of pay for level 4 of the Senior Executive Service Schedule under section 5382 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 93–112, §18, formerly §16, as added Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, §403, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1114; renumbered §18, Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title VIII, §402(a)(1)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–412.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in section 717 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220.

A prior section 715, Pub. L. 93–112, §16, as added Pub. L. 95–602, title I, §122(a)(10), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2987; amended Pub. L. 99–506, title I, §107, Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1812; Pub. L. 102–569, title I, §108(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4363, related to transfer of funds, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, §403, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1093. See section 713 of this title.

A prior section 18 of Pub. L. 93–112 was renumbered section 20 and is classified to section 717 of this title.

Another prior section 18 of Pub. L. 93–112 was classified to section 717 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT PmRCE DIVISION 

CASE NO.: 20-cv-14219-RLR 0 

FELIPE BALTAZA R. and other 

similarly situated indi viduals. 

Plaintill. 

vs. 

B. GREEN & MORE LANDSCA PIN G, INC. 

and BILLY M. LOPEZ. individually. 

Defendant(s). 

MEDIATOR'S REPORT 

Daniel T. Peld, Esq., the unLkrsigncd Certified Med iator. reports to this 

Honorabl e Court as fo llows: 

The Mediation was held vi rtual ly on Scptembct· 8, 2020 ({j)_ 10:00 A.M. 

_L AN AGREEMENT WAS REACHED. 

__ The Agreemen t is attached with consent of the parties. 

NO AGREEMENT WAS REACHED: IMPASSE. 

The parties wish to continue settiement negotiations and may reconvene 

lor a continuation of the l'vlediation. Noti ce of the contin uation sha ll be 

provided to the parties and lilecl with the Court. 11· no Notice of an 

agreement is tiled with the Court on or belore _ /_/_ then this 

matter shaii be deemed at an impasse. 

Other:---- - - ------ - - - ----------

Case 2:20-cv-14219-RLR Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2020 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

I, Alan D. Feldman, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Midas, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Alan D. Feldman

Alan D. Feldman

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 17, 2012

I, William M. Guzik,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Midas, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ William M. Guzik

William M. Guzik

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 17,
2012
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.737 Fungible goods and materials. ( a ) *General.* A person claiming that a fungible good or material is an originating good may base the claim either on the physical segregation of the fungible good or material or by using an inventory management method with respect to the fungible good or material. For purposes of this section, the term “inventory management method” means: ( 1 ) Averaging;
( 2 ) “Last-in, first-out;”
( 3 ) “First-in, first-out;” or
( 4 ) Any other method that is recognized in the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles of the Party in which the production is performed or otherwise accepted by that country.
( b ) *Duration of use.* A person selecting an inventory management method under paragraph (a) of this section for a particular fungible good or material must continue to use that method for that fungible good or material throughout the fiscal year of that person.
#### § 4.1390 Scope.

Sections 4.1391 through 4.1394 set forth the procedures for obtaining review of an OSM determination under 30 CFR 761.16 that a person does or does not have valid existing rights.

[67 FR 61512, Oct. 1, 2002]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 2283

_____________________________
T HOMAS M C N EIL ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

— Original Jurisdiction

.

September 22, 2021

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. See E nglish v. McCrary , 348 So. 2d 293, 296

– 97 (Fla. 1977) (explaining that prohibition “ is preventive and not corrective
, ” the purpose of whi c h “ is to prevent the doing of something, not to compel the undoing of something already done ”); Sparkman v. McClure , 498 So. 2d 892, 895 (Fla. 1986) (explaining that prohibition “ cannot be utilized to revoke an order already entered ” and that it “ will not lie where the proceedings below have already been completed ”).

R AY , J AY , and T ANENBAUM , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Thomas McNeil, pro se
, Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
### §1868. Semiannual compilation and report of expenditures

(1) Commencing with the semiannual period beginning January 1, 1965 and for each semiannual period thereafter, the Architect of the Capitol shall compile and, not later than sixty days following the close of the semiannual period, submit to the Senate and the House of Representatives a report of all expenditures made from monies appropriated to the Architect of the Capitol, based on payrolls and other vouchers transmitted during such period to the Treasury Department for disbursement, such report to include (1) the name, title, and gross salary payment to each employee; (2) a list of government contributions to retirement, health, insurance, and other similar funds; and (3) name of payee, brief description of service rendered or items furnished under contract, purchase order or other agreement. Such report shall be printed as a Senate document.

(2) The report by the Architect of the Capitol under paragraph (1) for the semiannual period beginning on January 1, 1976, shall include the period beginning on July 1, 1976, and ending on September 30, 1976, and such semiannual period shall be treated as closing on September 30, 1976. Thereafter, the report by the Architect of the Capitol under paragraph (1) shall be for the semiannual periods beginning on October 1 and ending on March 31 and beginning on April 1 and ending on September 30 of each year.

(Pub. L. 88–454, §105(b), Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 551; Pub. L. 94–303, title I, §118(c), June 1, 1976, 90 Stat. 616.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 162b of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–303 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of provisions in par. (1) of this section relating to the requirement that the Architect of the Capitol submit a semiannual report to the Senate and the House of Representatives, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 1 of House Document No. 103–7.
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4094 — INEOS/BP Dormagen)

(2006/C 25/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-57 June 11, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR POWER STATION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois, have

announced the assignment of Paul Krohn as the agency's Resident

Inspector at the Prairie Island Nuclear Power Station in Red

Wing, Minnesota.

Krohn joined the NRC as a reactor engineer at the Region III

Office in October of last year. Prior to joining the NRC, he

worked for Lockheed Martin Inc. as a nondestructive testing

development engineer at Knolls Atomic Nuclear Power Laboratory in

New York. He also was a shift supervisor and nuclear plant

engineer for General Electric at a U.S. Naval Nuclear Submarine

Prototype Power Plant. He is a Licensed Professional Engineer.

He received a bachelor's degree in marine engineering from the

State University of New York Maritime College and a master's

degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Michigan.

Krohn and his wife, son and daughter plan to reside near the

Prairie Island station in Red Wing.

Krohn joins NRC Senior Resident Steve Ray and Resident Inspector

Russ Bywater at Prairie Island. They can be reached at 612/388-

8209.

####
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.820 Certificate of eligibility.

Upon request, an importer claiming preferential tariff treatment on a non-originating cotton or man-made fiber good specified in § 10.819 of this subpart must submit to CBP a certificate of eligibility. The certificate of eligibility must be completed and signed by an authorized official of the Government of Bahrain and must be in the possession of the importer at the time the preferential tariff treatment is claimed.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Become a B.A.R.K. Ranger at Pu'ukohola Heiau National Historic Site

Puʻukoholā Heiau National Historic Site
#### Louise Wiegand, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order denying plaintiff’s motion, pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, for an order correcting, supplying and disregarding certain defects in a notice of claim served upon respondent, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Nolan, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.306 Direct shipment to the United States. Goods shall be considered as directly shipped to the United States from Canada for the purpose of eligibility for preferences under the Agreement only under the following circumstances: ( a ) *Through shipment.* The goods have been shipped directly from Canada to the United States without passage through the territory of any third country; or
( b ) *Shipment through a third country.* The goods were shipped through the territory of a third country but: ( 1 ) The goods did not enter the commerce of any third country;
( 2 ) The goods did not undergo any operation other than unloading, reloading, or any operation necessary to transport them to the United States or to preserve them in good condition; and
( 3 ) All shipping and export documents show the United States as the final destination.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM S32399

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Johnathan R. WILLIAMS

Senior Airman (E-4), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 5 July 2017

________________________

Military Judge: L. Martin Powell.

Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for five months, and 

reduction to E-1. Sentence adjudged 11 March 2016 by SpCM convened at 

Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana. 

For Appellant: Major Jarett Merk, USAF.

For Appellee: Gerald R. Bruce, Esquire.

Before DREW, J. BROWN, and HARDING, Appellate Military Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as 

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 

59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). 
United States v. Williams, No. ACM S32399

2

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

KURT J. BRUBAKER

Clerk of the Court
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-25 April 10, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC, BEAVER VALLEY OPERATOR TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of FirstEnergy Nuclear

Operating Company on Thursday, April 13, to discuss apparent violations of agency requirements

relating to pump problems at the Beaver Valley nuclear power plant. FirstEnergy operates the plant,

which is located in Shippingport, Pa.

The predecisional enforcement conference will begin at 1 p.m. in the Division of Reactor

Projects conference room at the NRC Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa.

The apparent violations pertain to pump failures in February at Beaver Valley Unit 1 and a

water hammer event in November at Unit 2.

With regard to the pump failures, Unit 1 has three pumps it uses to draw water from the Ohio

River. That water is used for the cooling of non-radioactive, safety-related components in the plant. In

early February, two of the pumps at that unit failed to start after a change made to the flow of water

around the pumps’ seals caused the expansion of pump internals. Both of the affected pumps were in

standby mode at the time and the third pump was successfully operating.

In an apparent violation at Unit 2, a plant operator on November 21 found that the discharge

expansion joint for the "B" service water pump had become deformed, possibly as the result of a water

hammer, or pressure pulse, event in the system. (At Unit 2, the system used to pump water from the

river for the cooling of safety-related, non-radioactive components is known as the service water

system. Like Unit 1, Unit 2 utilizes three pumps for its system.) Plant engineers subsequently

determined that the pump had been relied on to serve as one of two required operable service water

pumps from November 15-21. Further, they concluded that since November 9 the degraded expansion

joint may not have been capable of withstanding a pump restart.

Although the NRC began using its revised reactor oversight program at all U.S. commercial

nuclear plants on April 2, these apparent violations -- because they were identified during inspections

that occurred prior to that change -- are being addressed under the previous program.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that the NRC has
2

determined a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee with an

opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to

enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this conference. That decision will be

made by NRC officials at a later time.

#
### SUBCHAPTER III—CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
No: 23-067 October 26, 2023 

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Approves Changes to Indian Point Energy Center

Emergency Planning Requirements

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has granted Holtec Decommissioning 

International’s request to revise the emergency preparedness plan for the Indian Point Energy 

Center in Buchanan, New York, to reflect the plant’s decommissioning status.

The approved exemptions were needed for Holtec to establish and maintain an adequate 

level of radiological emergency preparedness during decommissioning. These exemptions are 

consistent with NRC actions at other decommissioning plants. Once Holtec implements the 

changes, state and local governments may rely on a comprehensive emergency management plan 

approach (“all hazards”) for offsite emergency response, should an event occur at Indian Point. A 

10-mile emergency planning zone is no longer required. Holtec must continue to maintain an 

onsite emergency plan and response capabilities at Indian Point, including the continued 

notification of state government officials in the event of an emergency declaration. 

After a nuclear power plant has permanently ceased operations and removed fuel from 

the reactor vessel, the risk of an offsite radiological release is significantly lower, and the types 

of possible accidents significantly fewer, than at an operating reactor. The NRC staff evaluated 

and confirmed analyses in Holtec’s request and considered comments from the Federal 

Emergency Management Agency. Based on the NRC staff’s evaluation and recommendation, the 

Commission approved the exemptions on Oct. 24. The exemptions and associated license 

amendments reflecting the changes will be issued in the next few weeks.

Indian Point Energy Center has three pressurized-water reactors, located along the 

Hudson River, about 24 miles north of New York City. Unit 1 shut down in 1974, while Units 2 

and 3 ceased operations in 2020 and 2021, respectively. All of the plant’s fuel has been removed 

from the spent fuel pools and placed in dry storage on the site.
### §796a. Definitions

As used in this part:

#### (1) Administrator

The term "Administrator" means the Administrator of the Administration for Community Living of the Department of Health and Human Services.

#### (2) Center for independent living

The term "center for independent living" means a consumer-controlled, community-based, cross-disability, nonresidential private nonprofit agency for individuals with significant disabilities (regardless of age or income) that—

(A) is designed and operated within a local community by individuals with disabilities; and

(B) provides an array of independent living services, including, at a minimum, independent living core services as defined in section 705(17) of this title.

#### (3) Consumer control

The term "consumer control" means, with respect to a center for independent living, that the center vests power and authority in individuals with disabilities, in terms of the management, staffing, decisionmaking, operation, and provisions of services, of the center.

(Pub. L. 93–112, title VII, §702, as added Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, §410, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1218; amended Pub. L. 113–128, title IV, §473, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1685.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 796a, Pub. L. 93–112, title VII, §702, as added Pub. L. 102–569, title VII, §701(2), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4443, defined terms "center for independent living" and "consumer control", prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 105–220.

Another prior section 796a, Pub. L. 93–112, title VII, §702, as added Pub. L. 95–602, title III, §301, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2995; amended Pub. L. 99–506, title I, §103(d)(2)(A), (C), title VIII, §801, title X, §§1001(g)(1), 1002(h), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1810, 1837, 1843, 1844; Pub. L. 100–630, title II, §208(a), Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3314, provided eligibility requirements and definition of "comprehensive services for independent living", prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–569, §701(1).

#### Amendments

2014—Par. (1). Pub. L. 113–128, §473(4), added par. (1). Former par. (1) redesignated (2).

Pub. L. 113–128, §473(1)(A), inserted "for individuals with significant disabilities (regardless of age or income)" before "that—" in introductory provisions.

Par. (1)(B). Pub. L. 113–128, §473(1)(B), inserted ", including, at a minimum, independent living core services as defined in section 705(17) of this title" before period at end.

Par. (2). Pub. L. 113–128, §473(3), redesignated par. (1) as (2). Former par. (2) redesignated (3).

Pub. L. 113–128, §473(2), inserted ", in terms of the management, staffing, decisionmaking, operation, and provisions of services, of the center" before period at end.

Par. (3). Pub. L. 113–128, §473(3), redesignated par. (2) as (3).
§ 333.63 Notification of failure to comply. ( a ) At the conclusion of an audit, investigation, or other inquiry, or at any other time, FEMA may inform the person in writing where compliance with the requirements of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action were not met.
( b ) In cases where FEMA determines that a person, either willingly or inadvertently, has failed to comply with the provisions of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action, the person may be informed in writing of the particulars involved and the corrective action to be taken. Failure to take corrective action may then be construed as a willful violation of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action.