alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUMMARY OF TREASURY OFFSET PROGRAM CHILD 

SUPPORT COLLECTION ACTIVITY

Financial Management Service (FMS) offsets federal tax refund payments and certain nontax payments to collect past due child support obligations under its Treasury Offset Program 

(TOP). In fiscal year 2005, total TOP collections for delinquent child support obligations 

from both tax and non-tax payments were $1.58 billion, $90 million more than the 

$1.49 billion collected in fiscal year 2004. The amount collected by offset since the 

publication of the Executive Order in September 1996 through fiscal year 2005 totals 

$12.7 billion. 

Collections from non-tax payments for fiscal year 2005 totaled $3.5 million, slightly more 

than the $2.6 million collected in fiscal year 2004. 

$1.64 $1.47 $1.52 $1.49 $1.58

$0.0

$0.2

$0.4

$0.6

$0.8

$1.0

$1.2

$1.4

$1.6

$1.8

$2.0

Dollars in Billions

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Fiscal Year

CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTIONS THROUGH 

THE TREASURY OFFSET PROGRAM
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Watching Wildlife





Contact Us
  Observe the World Around You  National parks offer a unique experience for watching wildlife. Animals in parks are wild—visitors have the amazing opportunity to view animals as they live and interact with each other in their natural homes. But with that privilege comes responsibility. Visitors are responsible for their own safety and for the safety of the animals, too. Simply put, leave animals alone—no touching, no feeding, no harassing. Just remember to keep your distance, and enjoy your experience watching wildlife.
 Embed Embed Video
 
 Close Copy
 Visit our keyboard shortcuts docs for details Duration:40.916 seconds A short video about the unique experience national parks provide for watching wildlife while reminding visitors to always keep a safe distance.
 mountain goatWatching Wildlife 101 Check out these pro tips from National Park Service employees.
 a young woman watches a marmot from a distance7 Ways to Safely Watch Wildlife Recreate Responsibly! The safety of wildlife, and you, depends on everyone using good judgment and following these simple guidelines.
 Elementary student bird watching with binocularsBring This, Not That What to bring to enhance your experience and what items you should leave at home
 Last updated: March 10, 2022
 Seasonal Sightings
 Protect Animals
 What We Do
 Webcams
 Tools Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
#### § 401.3 Reports.

Persons subject to this order shall submit such reports to the Assistant Secretary for Domestic and International Business as he shall require, subject to the terms of the Federal Reports Act.
#### Alexander A. Forman, Jr., Appellant, v. Thomas Malloy, Respondent.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on account of the failure to prove the judgment roll in the *Birdsall*v. *Baird*foreclosure proceedings, as a foundation for the referee’s deed. As to plaintiff and third persons, the recitals in a deed by the referee in foreclosure cannot establish the judicial proceedings, so that without the judgment roll the referee’s deed was unsupported, and did not pass the Baird title. *(Townshend*v. Wesson, 4 Duer, 343; *Platt*v. Picton, 3 Robt. 64; 3 Phillips Ev. [ed. of 1868] *614.) Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         485,206
<SECURITIES>                                19,666,496
<RECEIVABLES>                                  371,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,300
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,537,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          363,665
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,173,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,537,609
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               407,945
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                351,210
<INCOME-TAX>                                   351,210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            351,210
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   351,210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Order entered December j , 2012 

In The 

Court of appeal; 

liftb 313ilitritt of Texao at 3113affao 

No. 05-12-01522-CR 

EX PARTE KEITH D. ROANE 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 003-86164-04 

ORDER 

On November 14, 2012, the Court ordered the Collin County Clerk to file the clerk's 

record containing the documents related to appellant's application for writ of habeas corpus, 

including the trial court's written order ruling on appellant's application and the trial court's 

certification of appellant's right to appeal. The clerk's record filed on November 30, 2012 does 

not contain either the trial court's written order or the certification of appellant's right to appeal. 

The docket sheet notation showing the judge's ruling does not satisfy the requirement of a 

written order. 

Accordingly, we ORDER the Collin County Clerk to file, within the Collin County Clerk 

to file, within SEVEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk's record containing 

the trial court's written order ruling on appellant's application for writ of habeas corpus and the 

trial court's certification of appellant's right to appeal. 
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

following: 

• Honorable Lance Baxter, Presiding Judge, County Court at Law No. 3; 

• Collin County Clerk; and 

• Collin County District Attorney's Office. 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to Keith D. 

Roane, 809 Lake Place, Azle, Texas 76020. 

*4-4114— LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-105 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, July 25, 1996)

NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON DRAFT REPORT REGARDING CLEANUP

OF SHIELDALLOY SITE IN CAMBRIDGE, OHIO

The NRC has published for public comment a draft

environmental impact statement on the proposed decommissioning of

the Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation's facility in

Cambridge, Ohio.

The plant currently manufactures ferrovanadium, an alloy

used in high-grade steel. Shieldalloy has a license to possess

radioactive source material (thorium, uranium, and radioactive

decay products) left on site when Shieldalloy acquired the

property in 1987. This material is not used in the company's

current manufacturing process.

Interested persons may submit written comments on the report

to the Chief, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects

Branch, Mail Stop T7F-27, Division of Waste Management, Office of

Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001. Comments should be

submitted by October 31. NRC plans to hold a public meeting

this fall in the Cambridge area to hear views on the draft impact

statement, the time and place to be announced later.

The previous owner, Foote Mineral Company, processed

columbium ore from the early 1950s until 1973. These operations

generated slightly radioactive slag in the form of a glass-like

rock. Since that time, no NRC-licensed material has been

processed at the Cambridge facility. The slag is NRC-regulated

material, but the agency does not believe it threatens the safety

of nearby residents.

Shieldalloy has been cleaning up the site since its

purchase, and has consolidated the slag into two piles: the west

pile, containing about 548,000 tons, and the east pile, with

about 58,000 tons. The larger west pile has already been covered

with clay, sand, and other materials. The company proposes to

cover both slag piles, revegetate the area, institute long-term

surveillance, and permanently restrict future use of the site.
The report, entitled "Draft Environmental Impact Statement;

Decommissioning of the Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation,

Cambridge, Ohio Facility," (NUREG-1543), describes the various

decommissioning options available and weighs their effects on

public health, safety and the environment. After the comment

period, a final environmental impact statement will be prepared

which will guide the NRC in reaching a decision on the cleanup

plan.

Interested persons may obtain free single copies of the

draft environmental impact statement by writing the NRC

Publications Section, Attention: Superintendent of Documents,

U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 37082, Washington, DC

20013-7082, or by calling 202-512-1800. A copy of the report is

also available in the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street,

NW, Washington, DC.

More information on the document is available in a notice

published in the July 25 edition of the Federal Register.

####
Case 1:13-cv-00713-RJL Docum ent18 Filed 10/09/13 Page1Of2

U NITED STATES D ISTRICT CO URT

DISTRICT O F CO LUM BIA

l

FILED BY / D.C.

JdL C8 2222

ANGELAE.NOBLE

cLERKU.s.DlST.c7:

s.D.OFFI.A.-MIAMI

Petitioller

CivilA ctionN o.l:l3-cv-713-RLW

REPUBLIC OF TH E CON GO ,

Respondent.

A M ENDED ORD ER A ND JUD GM ENT

Upon consideration of PetitionerCommissions ImportExport S.A.(çtpetitioner''l's

Petition to Confirm ArbitralAward (Dkt.No. l) and Motion forDefaultJudgmentand

Confirmation ofArbitralAward(Dkt.No.12),

subm issionstiledinsupportthereof,itishereby:

along with the M em orandum and evidentialy

O RDERED that the Petitioner's M otion for D efault Judgm ent and Confinnation of

ArbitralAwardisGRANTED;itis

FURTH ER O RD ER ED thatthe fsnalarbitralaw ard isstled on January 2l,2013,by the

International Cham ber of Com m erce, lntelmational Coul4 of Arbitration, in the m atter

denom inated Com missions lmport Export Ac/p?,/p/p'c

No.16257/EC/ND/M CP,is hereby CONFIRM ED,pursuantto

(rtp/?jlt7,

the FederalArbitration Act,

Case 1:20-cv-22802 Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/08/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case1:13-cv-00713-RJL Docum ent18 Filed 10/09/13 Page 2Of2

FURTHER ORDERED thatjudgmentishcrcby entered in favorofPetitionerand

against Respondent, Republic of the Congo,

US$855,000.Theseamotlntsretlectthesum totalofthet-ollowing:

* theaw arded sum off 222,749,598.82,.

* intereston theawarded sum atarateofl0% ,l-unningfrom December31,

2003, com pounded annually on D ecember 31, through the date of this

Judgm ent,O ctober9,20l3,foratotalinterestaw ard off 342,478,136.90*,

f 1,956,425 forreim bul-sem entofapol-tion ofClaim ant'slegalexpensesin

thearbitrationproceedings;and

US$ 855,000,representing a pol-tion of the lntem ationalChamberof Commerce

arbitrationcosts.

the am ounts of: f 567,184,160.72 and

Itis FUR TH ER O RD ERED thatthe Courthereby CO NFIRM S the aw ard ofpostawardinterestinfavorofPetitioner,and,pursuantto28U.S.C.j1961,ENTERSjudgmentfor

post-judgmentinterestatthestatutoryrate,from thedateofthisJudgmentuntilthedateoffu11

paym ent.

SO O RDERED .

Date: October9,2013

. l. DigitalysignedbyJudge

-'N

.aw ., RobertL.Wilkins

SJ':'j.:..- DN:cnc,ludgeRobertL. k''.'....':> WilkinsO=U.S.DistrictCourt

-''

' ou=chambersofHonorable

RobertL.Wilkins,

, email=RW@dc.uscourt.gov,

. cztjs

* tl,/.)u' '. . Date:2O13.10.0919:38:22

* -04'00d

Hon.RobcrtL. ilkins

Judge,U.S.DistrictCourtforthe

D istrictofColum bia

ECF

DOCUM ENT

Iherebyattzstandcertifythatthisis4printedcopyofa

documentwhlch*.selectronicaly fled withthe United

State:Distrld and Bankruptcy Courtsforthe OistrttQf

CDoiumbia. 4O 2ol

ateFded:

GELA D.CAE ,CLERK

By: &

Case 1:20-cv-22802 Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/08/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §1110. Exculpatory provisions; insurance

(a) Except as provided in sections 1105(b)(1) and 1105(d) of this title, any provision in an agreement or instrument which purports to relieve a fiduciary from responsibility or liability for any responsibility, obligation, or duty under this part shall be void as against public policy.

(b) Nothing in this subpart 1 shall preclude—

(1) a plan from purchasing insurance for its fiduciaries or for itself to cover liability or losses occurring by reason of the act or omission of a fiduciary, if such insurance permits recourse by the insurer against the fiduciary in the case of a breach of a fiduciary obligation by such fiduciary;

(2) a fiduciary from purchasing insurance to cover liability under this part from and for his own account; or

(3) an employer or an employee organization from purchasing insurance to cover potential liability of one or more persons who serve in a fiduciary capacity with regard to an employee benefit plan.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §410, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 886.)

1 So in original. This part does not contain subparts.
#### Albert E. McKenzie, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Graves-Quinn Corporation, v. Irving Trust Company.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Daniel Hunter, the Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of FinMetal Mining Ltd., and Kenneth Phillippe, the Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of FinMetal Mining Ltd., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of FinMetal Mining Ltd., for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of FinMetal Mining Ltd.



| | "Daniel Hunter"
By:       Daniel Hunter
Title:     Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and Chairman of Board of Directors
Date:   April 15, 2008
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | "Kenneth Phillippe"Kenneth PhillippeSecretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  April 15, 2008                         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FinMetal Mining Ltd. and will be retained by FinMetal Mining Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
# Eiropas Savienības C 27A/2006

| | ISSN 1725-5201 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 27A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 49. sējums2006. gada 3. februāris |

ISSN 1725-5201

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 27A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

49. sējums2006. gada 3. februāris

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Paziņojumi |
| | Eiropas Zāļu novērtēšanas aģentūra |
| 2006/C 027A/1 | Pieņemšana darbā Eiropas Zāļu novērtēšanas aģentūrā (Londonā) | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

III   Paziņojumi

Eiropas Zāļu novērtēšanas aģentūra

2006/C 027A/1

Pieņemšana darbā Eiropas Zāļu novērtēšanas aģentūrā (Londonā)

1

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

III Paziņojumi

Eiropas Zāļu novērtēšanas aģentūra

| 3.2.2006 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 27/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2006

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 27/1

---

PIEŅEMŠANA DARBĀ EIROPAS ZĀĻU NOVĒRTĒŠANAS AĢENTŪRĀ (LONDONĀ)

(2006/C 27 A/01)

Aģentūra atbild par medikamentu izmantošanu cilvēku ārstēšanā un veterinārijā, to novērtēšanas un pārraudzības koordinēšanu Eiropas Savienībā (skatīt Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 726/2004, kas publicēta 2004. gada 30. aprīļa Eiropas Savienības Oficiālajā Vēstnesī L 136, 1. lpp.). EMEA ir dibināta 1995. gada janvārī. Tai ir cieši kontakti ar Eiropas Komisiju, 25 ES dalībvalstīm, EEZ-EBTA valstīm un daudzām citām grupām valsts un privātajā sektorā.

Sīkāka informācija par EMEA un tās darbību ir atrodama internetā – mūsu adrese ir http://www.emea.eu.int

Eiropas Zāļu novērtēšanas aģentūra organizē atlases procedūras, lai veidotu rezerves sarakstu uz šādām vietām:

EMEA/A/222: Vecākais medicīniskais ierēdnis

(
  Senior Medical Officer (A*12))

Izvēlētie kandidāti tiek iekļauti rezerves sarakstā, un atkarībā no budžeta stāvokļa tiem var piedāvāt atjaunojamu līgumu uz pieciem gadiem saskaņā ar citu Eiropas Kopienas darbinieku nodarbinātības nosacījumiem (
  Eiropas Kopienu Oficiālais Vēstnesis L  56, 1968. gada 4. marts).

Darba vieta ir Londona.

Kandidātiem ir jābūt Eiropas Kopienu dalībvalstu vai Islandes, Norvēģijas vai Lihtenšteinas pilsoņiem, ar nosacījumu, ka viņiem ir visas pilsoņu tiesības.

Pilna informācija par darba apstākļiem, amata apraksts un vajadzīgā pieteikuma veidlapa iegūstama, lejupielādējot no EMEA tīmekļa vietnes http://www.emea.eu.int/htms/general/admin/recruit/recruitnew.htm.
  Pieteikuma veidlapa ir jāparaksta, uz tās jānorāda datums un, pievienojot visus apliecinošos dokumentus, tā jānosūta līdz
  2006. gada 17. martam
  (pasta zīmogs) uz šo adresi:

  EMEA – Head of Personnel, 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London E14 4HB, United Kingdom (Tālr.: (44-207) 418 84 00; fakss: (44-207) 418 84 16).

Turpmāk Oficiālais Vēstnesis vairs netiks automātiski izsūtīts saskaņā ar abonentu sarakstiem. Ja Jūs vēlaties saņemt informāciju par publikācijām, Jums jāreģistrējas adresē http://www.emea.eu.int “Online Mailing Service”.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7576

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

IESHA NICOLE ARMSTRONG,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:16-cr-00601-TDC-1)

Submitted: December 17, 2021 Decided: December 29, 2021

Before KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curium opinion.

Iesha Nicole Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Iesha Nicole Armstrong appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion for 

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step 

Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239, and denying her 

second motion for compassionate release, which the court construed as a motion for 

reconsideration. We review the denial of a motion for compassionate release for abuse 

of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 

383 (2021). Upon review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion 

in denying Armstrong’s motions based on its consideration of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) 

factors. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 187 (4th Cir. 2021). Accordingly, we

deny Armstrong’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s orders. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
### §1697. Service in multiparty, multiforum actions

When the jurisdiction of the district court is based in whole or in part upon section 1369 of this title, process, other than subpoenas, may be served at any place within the United States, or anywhere outside the United States if otherwise permitted by law.

(Added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, §11020(b)(4)(A)(i), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1828.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to a civil action if the accident giving rise to the cause of action occurred on or after the 90th day after Nov. 2, 2002, see section 11020(c) of Pub. L. 107–273, set out as a note under section 1369 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the 12 months ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Charles N. Martin, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

            (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                        of the Exchange Act; and

            (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Charles N. Martin, Jr.                      Charles N. Martin, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerSeptember 2, 2009