alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-248

November 18, 1999

NRC ISSUES NOTICE TO FUEL FACILITIES TO ENSURE CONTROLS EXIST

TO PREVENT CRITICALITY ACCIDENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a notice to its fuel facility licensees,

reminding them of controls they must have in place to avoid a nuclear criticality accident similar

to that which occurred at the Tokaimura plant in Japan on September 30.

The NRC has a robust regulatory program at its fuel facilities, which includes ongoing

inspection and licensing activities with highly trained and experienced professional staff. The

agency believes that the accident in Japan reinforces the need for such stringent requirements,

and provides an opportunity for an in-depth safety review of the plants in this country.

In the notice, licensees are encouraged to review their programs to assure that:

ˇ Controls are in place to avoid the possible commingling of high- and low- enriched

uranium;

ˇ Operators have received proper training and retraining with regard to criticality safety

rules and postings;

ˇ Operations are conducted in strict accordance with approved procedures;

ˇ New processes and restart of processes that have been shut down for an extended

period are covered by current safety assessments;

ˇ Emergency planning has been conducted, and both on- and offsite personnel are familiar

with criticality safety aspects of the facility;

ˇ Management provides appropriate oversight of high risk operations, to ensure plant

safety programs are effectively implemented.

Preliminary indications are that the accident in Japan was caused when operators placed

too much uranium into a vessel that was not specifically designed to prevent a criticality (chain

reaction). This resulted in the exposure of three operators to extremely high levels of radiation,

contamination of certain areas of the plant and the environment, and exposure to radiation of

emergency workers and some members of the public.
Japan has begun an investigation into the accident, and NRC will formally review the

results to determine whether safety findings there are applicable to fuel cycle plants in the United

States.

The NRC also plans to review the results of an industry-led initiative to assess U.S.

criticality programs.

The notice does not require any action or response; however, the NRC expects that the

owners of each fuel facility will review the notice to ensure that the proper procedures and

requirements necessary to maintain safety at their plants are being implemented.

###
#### Benjamin Feinberg, Respondent, v. Waldorf Ice Cream Corporation, Appellant.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johns *ton*and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.225 Filing of claim for preferential treatment. ( a ) *Declaration.* In connection with a claim for preferential treatment for a textile or apparel article described in § 10.223, the importer must make a written declaration that the article qualifies for that treatment. The inclusion on the entry summary, or equivalent documentation, of the subheading within Chapter 98 of the HTSUS under which the article is classified will constitute the written declaration. Except in any of the circumstances described in § 10.226(d)(1), the declaration required under this paragraph must be based on a Certificate of Origin that has been completed and properly executed in accordance with § 10.224 and that covers the article being imported.
( b ) *Corrected declaration.* If, after making the declaration required under paragraph (a) of this section, the importer has reason to believe that a Certificate of Origin on which a declaration was based contains information that is not correct, the importer must within 30 calendar days after the date of discovery of the error make a corrected declaration and pay any duties that may be due. A corrected declaration will be effected by submission of a letter or other written statement to the Customs port where the declaration was originally filed.
[T.D. 00-68, 65 FR 59658, Oct. 5, 2000; 65 FR 67263, Nov. 9, 2000, as amended by T.D. 03-12, 68 FR 13835, Mar. 21, 2003]
#### Bank of New York and Fifth Avenue Bank, as Committee of the Property of Blanche Bonaparte, Appellant, v. Union Mutual Life Insurance Company, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *posts*p. 822.]
### SUBCHAPTER II—EXTENSION OF RIGHTS AND PROTECTIONS
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****Guide to health insurance forpeople with Medicare.**
 
1998 | 2000
 
SuDoc:HE 22.8:H 34 | HE 22.8/17:
Item Number:0512-A-03
CGP systemNumber:000327989
 
October 25, 2017
#### § 102.0 Scope.

With the exception of §§ 102.21 through 102.25, this part sets forth rules for determining the country of origin of imported goods for the purposes specified in paragraph 1 of Annex 311 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”). Under NAFTA, these specific purposes are: country of origin marking; determining the rate of duty and staging category applicable to originating textile and apparel products as set out in Section 2 (Tariff Elimination) of Annex 300-B (Textile and Apparel Goods); and determining the rate of duty and staging category applicable to an originating good as set out in Annex 302.2 (Tariff Elimination). The rules set forth in §§ 102.1 through 102.18 and 102.20 also determine the country of origin for marking purposes of imported goods under the Agreement Between the United States of America, the United Mexican States, and Canada (USMCA). The rules set forth in §§ 102.1 through 102.21 of this part will also apply for purposes of determining whether an imported good is a new or different article of commerce under § 10.769 of the United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement regulations and § 10.809 of the United States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement regulations. The rules for determining the country of origin of textile and apparel products set forth in § 102.21 apply for the foregoing purposes and for the other purposes stated in that section. Section 102.22 sets forth rules for determining whether textile and apparel products are considered products of Israel for purposes of the customs laws and the administration of quantitative limitations. Sections 102.23 through 102.25 set forth certain procedural requirements relating to the importation of textile and apparel products.

[CBP Dec. 05-32; 70 FR 58013, Oct. 5, 2005, as amended by CBP Dec. 07-81, 72 FR 58522, Oct. 16, 2007; CBP Dec. 08-29, 73 FR 45354, Aug. 5, 2008; CBP Dec. 21-10, 86 FR 35581, July 6, 2021]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-73 September 2, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC SENDS INSPECTION TEAM TO INDIAN POINT 2 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has dispatched a fourperson team of inspectors from its Region I office in King of

Prussia, Pa., to the Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant to look

into the causes of and plant response to a reactor trip with

complications that occurred on Tuesday and led to the declaration

of an Unusual Event.

Known as an Augmented Inspection Team (AIT), it will be

charged with learning the facts surrounding the event.

All of the AIT members should arrive at the Buchanan,

N.Y., plant by sometime today. The team’s findings will be

available and made public about 30 days after completion of its

on-site reviews.

At 2:30 p.m. on Tuesday, Indian Point 2 experienced a

trip, or an automatic shutdown, after the receipt of a spurious

signal in a reactor protection system. A few minutes after the

trip, the plant’s three emergency diesel generators, which

provide power in the event of the loss of off-site power,

automatically activated after they received a signal indicating

that insufficient voltage was available to some plant safety

systems.

However, one of the emergency diesel generators failed to

load properly and that led to the eventual draindown of a battery

that serves as a backup power source. In turn, the plant lost a

number of its control room annunciators, or alarm panels. In

response, plant operators declared an Unusual Event -- the lowest

of four levels of emergency classification -- at about 9:55 p.m.

The annunciators were restored at about 1:30 a.m. on Wednesday.

The reactor was stabilized and remains in hot shutdown.

#
No: 23-029 April 14, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC to Regulate Fusion Energy Systems

Based on Existing Nuclear Materials Licensing

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has directed the staff to create a regulatory 

framework for fusion energy systems, building on the agency’s existing process for licensing the 

use of byproduct materials.

“Dozens of companies are developing pilot-scale commercial fusion designs, and while 

the technology’s precise future in the United States is uncertain, the agency should provide as 

much regulatory certainty as possible given what we know today,” said NRC Chair Christopher 

T. Hanson. “Licensing near-term fusion energy systems under a byproduct material framework 

will protect public health and safety with a technology-neutral, scalable regulatory approach.” 

NRC staff will begin a limited revision to materials licensing regulations, including 

consideration of whether the revision should create a new rule category specifically for fusion 

energy systems. The Commission also directed the staff to take several related actions, including 

expanding materials license guidance to cover fusion systems nationwide. 

Fusion systems would generate electricity from the energy released when hydrogen 

atoms are combined to form helium; current nuclear reactors use the splitting, or fission, of 

uranium atoms. The staff had earlier determined fusion systems fall outside of the requirements 

to be regulated as nuclear reactors.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-79 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, May 21, 1998)

COMMISSION CONCURS WITH STAFF ON THREE MILLSTONE RESTART ISSUES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has concurred with the NRC staff, subject

to conditions, that Northeast Utilities has made appropriate improvements on three

issues key to possible restart of the Millstone Unit 3 nuclear power plant near

Waterford, Conn.

The Commission is not authorizing the restart of Millstone Unit 3 at this time. It

will not consider such action before another public briefing on June 2 at NRC

headquarters in Rockville, Md.

The issues on which the Commission has concurred that adequate progress has

been demonstrated are: (1) the employee concerns program and a safety conscious

work environment; (2) management of backlog items; and (3) oversight and quality

assurance.

In a memorandum to the staff concerning these matters, subject of an all-day

public briefing on May 1, the Commission listed these conditions to its concurrence:

ˇ Little Harbor Consultants will continue its third-party oversight of the

employee concerns program and safety conscious work environment until

the Commission decides the oversight is no longer necessary.

ˇ The NRC staff will monitor Northeast Utilities’ commitments to reducing

the work backlog through a special team inspection to be conducted

before the end of the next Millstone Unit 3 refueling outage, as well as

through quarterly reviews.

ˇ The team inspection also will assess the ongoing effectiveness of the

utility’s oversight and quality assurance programs.

The Commission has further asked that--before the next scheduled briefing on

Millstone June 2--the staff provide any significant new information that may arise about

these three issues. Additionally, it has requested an updated assessment of issues
associated with a Northeast Utilities document that used the term “isolate cynics” in

discussing management strategies.

In future briefings about the other two Millstone units, the Commission has

directed that the staff include information about the employee concerns program and

safety-conscious work environment, plus the need for continued third-party oversight.

###

EDITORS: A copy of the Commission’s staff requirements memorandum concerning

these matters is available on the NRC Internet web page at:

http:\\www.nrc.gov\OPA\reports\.
(July 7, 1943.)

#### J. H. Holding Co., Inc., v. M. Josephine Wooten.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-146 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, October 3, 1997)

NRC TRANSFERS RESPONSIBILITY FOR

NEW MEXICO URANIUM MILL TAILINGS DISPOSAL SITE TO DOE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has granted the request of Atlantic Richfield

Company (ARCO) to terminate its license for a uranium mill site near Grants, New Mexico, and

has placed the site under the custody and long-term care of the Department of Energy, which is

now the licensee for the site.

The tailings represent a long-term potential health hazard to public health and safety

because they contain radium, which generates radon gas. Therefore the NRC requires that the

tailings be stabilized and covered with a clay barrier that prevents release of the gas.

The ARCO mill began operation in 1953 and operated until 1982. During that period,

approximately 24 million tons of uranium mill tailings were produced as a byproduct of the

uranium milling.

The Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 requires cleanup of soil

contamination, long-term stabilization and control of tailings, and cleanup of groundwater at

uranium mill sites. Before terminating the ARCO license, the NRC verified that the Bluewater

site had been cleaned up in accordance with applicable standards and that stabilization of the

tailings was in accordance with regulations and a previously approved design. The NRC also

reviewed DOE’s plan for long-term care of the site and concluded that the plan satisfied the

requirements of the Act.

The ARCO mill site is the second commercially operated uranium mill to be cleaned up

satisfactorily in conformance with NRC requirements. ARCO transferred $635,165 to DOE to

cover the costs of annual inspections to ensure that the site is maintained.

Any person whose interest may be affected by the licensing action may file a request for

a hearing. The request should be filed within 30 days after the publication of a Federal Register

notice on this subject, which is expected shortly. Procedures for filing the request will be

described in the Federal Register notice.

###
# Attachment M:

Endorser Annual Assessment Form

## Endorser Annual Assessment Form

Instructions

In the text boxes below, en ter narrative description s of the endorser activities undertaken in the past calendar year

(e.g., distributed 500 WasteWise Fact Sheets at a major trade association conference; gave five WasteWise

presentations to a total of 75 local business leaders; etc.). In addition, identify goals for th e current year (e.g., conduct

WasteWise forum for at least 25 local businesses ; provide recognition ceremony for local businesses that join

WasteWise, etc.). When possible, please make every attempt to quantify your actions and goals

. CLICK “SAVE” TO

RETAIN YOUR ENTRIES

.

Examples or Endorser A ctivities

U se of the WasteWise l ogo on company website

Distribute WasteWise p ublications

Give WasteWise presentations at c onferences and meetings

Provide r ecognition for WasteWise p artners

Provide t echnical a ssistance to c urrent/ p rospective WasteWise p artners or endorsers

Recruiting organizations to become WasteWise partners or endorsers

From:

To:

Endorser Activities Conducted

Please provide a narrative description of your Endorser Activities

Number of Organizations Reached:

Goals for Next Reporting Year

Save Month Day Year

Month Day Year
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I W. Kerry Jackson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                         
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company.

|Date:  September 8, 2005 | By: | /s/ W. Kerry Jackson                                                       
|------------------------ | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |     |                                                                            
|                         |     | W. Kerry Jackson    Executive Vice President and    Chief Financial Officer
SERVED JUNE 22, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

BUSH AIR CARGO , INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPlOALOOOl 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNo. FAA-2010-0311 

NOTICE OF HEARING DATES 

Paragraph #2 of the Procedural Order is amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following procedural 

schedule: 

... On or before October 1, 2010, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, but 

not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production requests 

and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute they shall submit 

the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner... 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered on 

October 19 and 20,2010, at the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska, 222 W. T'" 

Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska 99513.^ 

Hearings will corrunence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each day. The parties should 

vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00 p.m. each day. Settled cases will not be removed from 

the docket until the Judge receives the proper pleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by 

fax, express mail, courier or postal service. 

SO ORDERED. 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

•-•o,, , 

The court does not anticipate scheduling this case prior to 1 August 2010. 

The parties are advised to check with the Clerk's office to confirm the exact courtroom on the day of the hearing. 
FAA Docket No. CPlOALOOOl 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000^ 

ONE COPY 

Brent M. Tieman, President 

Bush Air Cargo, Inc., Respondent 

P.O. Box 93144 

Anchorage, AK 99509-3144 

TEL: 907-277-7657 

FAX: 907-274-1725 

Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AAL-7 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 West 7* Avenue, Box 14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5269 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202- 366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' ' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
### §1385. Expenses

#### (a) Authorization of appropriations

Beginning in fiscal year 1995, and for each fiscal year thereafter, there are authorized to be appropriated for the expenses of the Office such sums as may be necessary to carry out the functions of the Office. Until sums are first appropriated pursuant to the preceding sentence, but for a period not exceeding 12 months following January 23, 1995—

(1) one-half of the expenses of the Office shall be paid from funds appropriated for allowances and expenses of the House of Representatives, and

(2) one-half of the expenses of the Office shall be paid from funds appropriated for allowances and expenses of the Senate,

upon vouchers approved by the Executive Director, except that a voucher shall not be required for the disbursement of salaries of employees who are paid at an annual rate. The Clerk of the House of Representatives and the Secretary of the Senate are authorized to make arrangements for the division of expenses under this subsection, including arrangements for one House of Congress to reimburse the other House of Congress.

#### (b) Financial and administrative services

The Executive Director may place orders and enter into agreements for goods and services with the head of any agency, or major organizational unit within an agency, in the legislative or executive branch of the United States in the same manner and to the same extent as agencies are authorized under sections 1535 and 1536 of title 31 to place orders and enter into agreements.

#### (c) Witness fees and allowances

Except for covered employees, witnesses before a hearing officer or the Board in any proceeding under this chapter other than rulemaking shall be paid the same fee and mileage allowances as are paid subpoenaed witnesses in the courts of the United States. Covered employees who are summoned, or are assigned by their employer, to testify in their official capacity or to produce official records in any proceeding under this chapter shall be entitled to travel expenses under subchapter I and section 5751 of chapter 57 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 104–1, title III, §305, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 31.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–1, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 3, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1301 of this title and Tables.