alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1222. Duties

(a) The Joint Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Employee Stock Ownership Plan Task Force shall, within 24 months after September 2, 1974, make a full study and review of—

(1) the effect of the requirements of section 411 of title 26 and of section 1053 of this title to determine the extent of discrimination, if any, among employees in various age groups resulting from the application of such requirements;

(2) means of providing for the portability of pension rights among different pension plans;

(3) the appropriate treatment under subchapter III of this chapter (relating to termination insurance) of plans established and maintained by small employers;

(4) the broadening of stock ownership, particularly with regard to employee stock ownership plans (as defined in section 4975(e)(7) of title 26 and section 1107(d)(6) of this title) and all other alternative methods for broadening stock ownership to the American labor force and others;

(5) the effects and desirability of the Federal preemption of State and local law with respect to matters relating to pension and similar plans; and

(6) such other matter as any of the committees referred to in section 1221 of this title may refer to it.

(b) The Joint Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Employee Stock Ownership Plan Task Force shall report the results of its study and review to each of the committees referred to in section 1221 of this title.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title III, §3022, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 999; Pub. L. 94–455, title VIII, §803(i)(1), (2)(A)(iii), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1590, 1591; Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7891(a)(1), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2445.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1989—Subsec. (a)(1), (4). Pub. L. 101–239 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954", which for purposes of codification was translated as "title 26" thus requiring no change in text.

1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–455, §803(i)(1), (2)(A)(iii), substituted "Joint Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Employee Stock Ownership Plan Task Force" for "Joint Pension Task Force" in provision preceding par. (1), redesignated pars. (4) and (5) as (5) and (6), respectively, and added par. (4).

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–455, §803(i)(2)(A)(iii), substituted "Joint Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Employee Stock Ownership Plan Task Force" for "Joint Pension Task Force".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1989 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–239 effective, except as otherwise provided, as if included in the provision of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99–514, to which such amendment relates, see section 7891(f) of Pub. L. 101–239, set out as a note under section 1002 of this title.
#### Samuel B. Weingrad, Respondent, v. Jacob Gerstein, Appellant.

Action to recover on a cheek. Order denying defendant’s motion for a change of venue from Nassau County to New York County, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
#### Minnie Scanlon, Appellant, v. Andrew Kruatkowski and Werra Kruatkowski, Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the case contains no exception which authorizes us to review the action of the trial court in granting the motion dismissing the complaint. *(Collier*v. Collins, 172 N. Y. 99.) Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
#### § 108.1930 Effect of changes in this part 108 on transactions previously consummated.

The legality of a transaction covered by the regulations in this part is governed by the regulations in this part in effect at the time the transaction was consummated, regardless of later changes. Nothing in this part bars SBA enforcement action with respect to any transaction consummated in violation of provisions applicable at the time, but no longer in effect.
Exhibit 10.41

The named executive officers of Midas, Inc. (the Company) are at will employees to the extent that they do not have written employment agreements with the Company. The annual base salaries of
the named executive officers are set annually by the Companys Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of its Compensation Committee. For 2009, the annual base salaries of the Companys named executive officers are as follows:



|                                                         |  |   |        
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | -------
|Alan D. Feldman (President and CEO):                     |  | $ | 725,000
|                                                         | 
|William M. Guzik (SVP and CFO):                          |  | $ | 295,000
|                                                         | 
|Frederick W. Dow, Jr. (SVP and Chief Marketing Officer): |  | $ | 257,500
|                                                         | 
|Alvin K. Marr (SVP, General Counsel and Secretary):      |  | $ | 225,000
|                                                         | 
|John A. Warzecha (SVP, Franchise Business Development):  |  | $ | 150,000

In addition, in 2009, each of these executive officers is entitled to participate in the
Companys Stock Incentive Plan and the 2009 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan.

All other terms of the named executive officers
respective employment with the Company are set annually by mutual agreement of the Board of Directors and such executives.
#### Berta Murphy et al., Appellants, v. Long Island Railroad Company, Respondent.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
#### § 5.89 Waiver.

The Chief Counsel may grant, in writing, a waiver of any policy or procedure prescribed by this subpart, where waiver is considered necessary to promote a significant interest of the Agency or for other good cause. In granting such waiver, the Chief Counsel shall attach to the waiver such reasonable conditions and limitations as are deemed appropriate in order that a response in strict compliance with the terms of a subpoena duces tecum or the providing of testimony will not interfere with the duties of the employee and will otherwise conform to the policies of this part. The Administrator may, in his or her discretion, review any decision to authorize a waiver of any policy or procedure prescribed by this subpart.
**Exhibit23.1**

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-81440 on FormS-3 and in Registration Statement No. 333-75336 on Form S-8 of ApexMortgage Capital, Inc. of our report dated March 6, 2003 (March 13, 2003 as toNote 13), which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph relating to the change in method of accounting forderivative financial instruments, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Apex Mortgage Capital, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Los Angeles, CaliforniaMarch 27, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
EDF transmission and storage paper 

Sent from my iPhone 

Begin forwarded message: 

From: "Zimmerle,Dan" <Dan.Zimmerle@colostate.edu> 

Date: July 21, 2015 at 8:13:32 AM EDT 

To: "Weitz, Melissa" <Weitz.Melissa@epa.gov>, "James Bradbury 

(James.Bradbury@Hq.Doe.Gov)" <James.Bradbury@Hq.Doe.Gov> 

Subject: FW: Your ACS manuscript acs.est.5b01669 has been made open access

For your reference, here is a link to the paper.  If you can forward within your teams, I would appreciate

it.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

Daniel Zimmerle

970‐581‐9945 (cell)

dan.zimmerle@colostate.edu

Scheduling: Contact Jacqueline Vance at Jacqueline.Vance@colostate.edu

Senior Researcher & Director, Electric Power System Laboratory

Personal Page:                      http://energy.colostate.edu/p/dan‐zimmerle.html

Smart Village Microgrids:  http://energy.colostate.edu/p/svm

Energy Institute:                  http://energy.colostate.edu/

From: support@services.acs.org [mailto:support@services.acs.org]  

Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 8:01 AM

To: Zimmerle,Dan

Cc: dzimmerle@comcast.net

Subject: Your ACS manuscript acs.est.5b01669 has been made open access

 

Dear Prof. Daniel Zimmerle, 

Your published article 

Methane Emissions from the Natural Gas Transmission and Storage System in the United States 

was purchased into open access and is now openly available to all readers under the terms of the 

AuthorChoice license. 

If you have questions regarding this purchase, please reach out to support@services.acs.org. 

Thank you for publishing with ACS. 

Best regards, 

Darla Henderson, Ph.D. 

Asst. Director, Open Access Programs 

American Chemical Society
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-83024 andNo. 333-115771) and Form S-8 (No. 333-53552, No. 333-108178 and No. 333-118010) of Tripath Technology Inc. of our report dated November 23, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements and our report datedNovember 23, 2005 except as to the fourth, seventh and ninth paragraphs of Note 8, which are as of December 15, 2005, relating to internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K/A. 

 

/s/    STONEFIELDJOSEPHSON INC. 

 

San Francisco, CA 

December 15, 2005
#### Patricia Atkinson, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, William Atkinson, et al., Respondents, v. Eastern Cab Co., Inc., Appellant.

Present— Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARIO E.G. HERNANDEZ,

Appellant,

v.

CITY OF EL PASO,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00291

- CV

Appeal from

327th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2012

- DTX04029)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is a motion filed by Appellant, Mario E. G. Hernandez

, to

dismiss the appeal pursuant to T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a)(1) because the dispute between the parties

has been resolved . We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal . Costs of th e appeal are taxed

against Appellant

. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1 (d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax

costs against the appellant

. ”).

February 4, 2015

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
#### § 142.19 How are issues brought to the attention of the ALJ?

All applications to the ALJ for an order or ruling are made by motion, stating the relief sought, the authority relied upon, and the facts alleged. Procedures for filing motions under this section are governed by § 134.211 of this chapter.
#### § 334.7 Reporting.

The Administrator of FEMA shall provide the President with periodic assessments of the Federal departments and agencies capabilities to respond to national security emergencies and periodic reports to the National Security Council on the implementation of the national security emergency preparedness policy. Pursuant to section 201(15) of Executive Order 12656, departments and agencies, as appropriate, shall consult and coordinate with the Administrator of FEMA to ensure that their activities and plans are consistent with current National Security Council guidelines and policies. An evaluation of the Federal departments and agencies participation in the graduated mobilization response program may be included in these reports.
#### Stephen Alvino, Appellant, v. Lorraine Fibre Mills, Inc., et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.347 Use of proceeds.

The Borrower may use loan proceeds to acquire, construct, renovate, modernize, improve, or expand facilities and equipment to be used in the United States to produce goods or services involved in international trade, and to develop and penetrate foreign markets. The Borrower may also use proceeds in the refinancing of existing indebtedness that is not structured with reasonable terms and conditions, including any debt that qualifies for refinancing under 7(a) Loan Program Requirements, and to provide working capital.

[61 FR 3235, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 76 FR 63546, Oct. 12, 2011]
### SUBCHAPTER I—GRANTS TO STATES
### §110. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 110 was editorially reclassified as section 4105 of this title.
### §557a. Mine Safety and Health Administration

There is established in the Department of Labor a Mine Safety and Health Administration to be headed by an Assistant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety and Health appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Secretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Mine Safety and Health, shall have authority to appoint, subject to the civil service laws, such officers and employees as he may deem necessary for the administration of this Act, and to prescribe powers, duties, and responsibilities of all officers and employees engaged in the administration of this Act. The Secretary is authorized and directed, except as specifically provided otherwise to carry out his functions under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 [30 U.S.C. 801 et seq.] through the Mine Safety and Health Administration.

(Pub. L. 95–164, title III, §302(a), Nov. 9, 1977, 91 Stat. 1319.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, means Pub. L. 95–164, Nov. 9, 1977, 91 Stat. 1290, known as the Federal Mine Safety and Health Amendments Act of 1977, which enacted this section, sections 822 to 825 and 961 of Title 30, Mineral Lands and Mining, amended sections 5314 and 5315 of Title 5, and sections 801 to 804, 811 to 821, 842, 861, 878, 951 to 955, 958 and 959 of Title 30, repealed sections 721 to 740 of Title 30 and section 1456a of Title 43, Public Lands, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 801 and 954 of Title 30 and section 11 of former Title 31, Money and Finance. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1977 Amendment note set out under section 801 of Title 30 and Tables.

The Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 91–173, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 742, which is classified principally to chapter 22 (§801 et seq.) of Title 30. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 801 of Title 30 and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 120 days after Nov. 9, 1977, see section 307 of Pub. L. 95–164, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 801 of Title 30, Mineral Lands and Mining.
First Department,

May, 1948.

(May 3, 1948.)

#### In the Matter of the Accounting of United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee under the Will of Henry L. Slade, Deceased, Appellant. Jacob Markowitz, Special Guardian for Jarvis J. Slade and Others, Respondents.

Decree, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
#### § 142.41 How does SBA protect the rights of defendants?

These procedures separate the functions of the investigating official, reviewing official, and the ALJ, each of whom report to a separate organizational authority in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3801. Except for purposes of settlement, or as a witness or a representative in public proceedings, no investigating official, reviewing official, or SBA employee or agent who helps investigate, prepare, or present a case may (in such case, or a factually related case) participate in the initial decision or the review of the initial decision by the Administrator. This separation of functions and organization is designed to assure the independence and impartiality of each government official during every stage of the proceeding. The representative for SBA may be employed in the offices of either the investigating official or the reviewing official.
### §1258. Supreme Court of Puerto Rico; certiorari

Final judgments or decrees rendered by the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico may be reviewed by the Supreme Court by writ of certiorari where the validity of a treaty or statute of the United States is drawn in question or where the validity of a statute of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is drawn in question on the ground of its being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, or where any title, right, privilege, or immunity is specially set up or claimed under the Constitution or the treaties or statutes of, or any commission held or authority exercised under, the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 87–189, §1, Aug. 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 417; amended Pub. L. 100–352, §4, June 27, 1988, 102 Stat. 662.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–352 struck out "appeal;" before "certiorari" in section catchline and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Final judgments or decrees rendered by the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico may be reviewed by the Supreme Court as follows:

"(1) By appeal, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of the United States and the decision is against its validity.

"(2) By appeal, where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico on the ground of its being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, and the decision is in favor of its validity.

"(3) By writ of certiorari, where the validity of a treaty or statute of the United States is drawn in question or where the validity of a statute of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is drawn in question on the ground of its being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, or where any title, right, privilege, or immunity is specially set up or claimed under the Constitution, treaties, or statutes of, or commission held or authority exercised under, the United States."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–352 effective ninety days after June 27, 1988, except that such amendment not to apply to cases pending in Supreme Court on such effective date or affect right to review or manner of reviewing judgment or decree of court which was entered before such effective date, see section 7 of Pub. L. 100–352, set out as a note under section 1254 of this title.
§ 1.6 Ex parte communications. ( a ) All oral or written communications from outside the Federal Executive branch of significant information and argument respecting the merits of a rulemaking document, received after publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking, by FEMA or its offices and divisions or their personnel participating in the decision, must be summarized in writing and placed promptly in the public docket. This applies until the agency publishes a final regulatory action such as a withdrawal of the notice of proposed rulemaking or a final rule.
( b ) FEMA may conclude that restrictions on ex parte communications are necessitated at other times by considerations of fairness or for other reasons.
( c ) This section does not apply to Tribal consultations.
469 P.2d 152

#### STATE of New Mexico, ex rel. FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC., Relator, v. PROPERTY APPRAISAL DEPARTMENT, State of New Mexico, and Haskel B. Smith, Director, Respondents.

No. 9048.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

May 21, 1970.

TACKETT, Acting Chief Justice, and WATSON, SISK and McKENNA, Justices concurring.

COMPTON, Chief Justice,

not participating.

Ordered that the alternative writ of Mandamus heretofore issued herein on May 4, 1970, be and the same is hereby quashed as having been improvidently issued.
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 
 **18
        U.S.C. §1350,**
 
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Diametrics Medical, Inc. (the “Company”)
        on Form 10-QSB/A Amendment No. 3 for the quarter ended September 30, 2006
        as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        “Report”), I, W. Bruce Comer III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/
                      W. Bruce Comer IIIW.
                      Bruce Comer III
                  Chief
                      Executive Officer
                  June
                    11,
                    2007
 A
        signed
        original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-95 August 14, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC, UTILITY TO DISCUSS MILLSTONE UNITS AT TWO MEETINGS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Millstone Special

Projects Office will hold two meetings next week regarding

recovery efforts at the Millstone nuclear power plant in

Waterford, Conn. Northeast Utilities operates the facility.

On Monday, August 17, NRC staff and NU representatives

will discuss the Independent Corrective Action Verification

Program for Unit 2. That meeting will begin at 1 p.m. in

training facility at the plant and will be open to the public for

observation.

On Tuesday, August 18, NRC staff and NU representatives

will review plans, schedules and progress toward the recovery of

Millstone Units 2 and 3. (NU recently announced that the third

reactor at the site, Unit 1, was being permanently shut down.)

Topics will include the schedule and a status report of restart

activities for Unit 2, as well as backlog management, performance

indicators and the power ascension performance assessment for

Unit 3. That session will get under way at 1 p.m. in the

training center and also will be open to the public for

observation.

ˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇˇ ̨