alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.64

**AMENDMENT NO. 1TOEMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

            This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment’) dated as of May 5, 2009, is made by and between Vanguard Health Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Kent H.Wallace (the “Executive”).

            **WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive executed a certain Employment Agreement  dated as of November 15, 2007 ( the “EA”),  to secure the services of President andChief Operating Officer; and

            **WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive wish the Executive’s base salary set forth in Section 6(a) of the EA to be increased to $685,000, effective as of April 1, 2009.

            **NOW, THEREFORE**, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that the EA is amended as follows:

            1.         Defined Terms.  Except for those terms defined above, the definitions of capitalized terms used in this Amendment are as provided inthe EA.

            2.**        **Amendment to Section 6(a).  Section 6(a) of the EA entitled “Base Salary” is hereby  deleted and replaced withthe following new Section 6(a):

                        “(a)  *Base Salary.*  Effective April 1, 2009, the Executive’s base salary hereunder                        shall be $685,000 per year, payable semi-monthly. Commencing July 1, 2010, the                        Board shall review such base salary at least annually and make such adjustments from                        time to time as it may deem advisable, but the base salary shall not at any time be                        reduced from the base salary in effect from time to time.”

            3.         Ratification.  All other provisions of the EA remain unchanged and are hereby  ratified  by the Company and theExecutive.

1

----

                        **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by  its duly authorized officer and theExecutive has executed this Amendment, each as of the day and year first set forth above.

                                                                       **Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.**

                                                                       By:/s/ Ronald P. Soltman                                                                                                                    Ronald P. Soltman                                                                                   Executive Vice President

                                                                       **Executive**:

****

**                                                                       **/s/ Kent H.Wallace                                                                                                                Kent H. Wallace

2
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.15 Fabricated components not subject to the exemption. Fabricated components which are not products of the United States are excluded from the exemption. In addition, the exemption is not applicable to any component exported from the Customs territory of the United States: ( a ) From continuous Customs custody with remission, abatement, or refund of duty;
( b ) With benefit of drawback;
( c ) To comply with any law of the United States or regulation of any Federal agency requiring exportation; or
( d ) After manufacture or production in the United States under subheading 9813.00.05, HTSUS (19 U.S.C. 1202).
Example. Partially completed components of an electric motor are imported in several separate shipments and are entered under a temporary importation bond to be manufactured into finished motors under the provisions of subheading 9813.00.05, HTSUS (19 U.S.C. 1202). The components are completed and assembled into finished electric motors. The finished motors are exported and are assembled abroad into electric fans which are subsequently imported into the United States. Irrespective of the fact that the assembly of the motors might involve such a substantial change that the motor could be considered a product of the United States, no exemption may be given for the value of the electric motors, since they were exported after manufacture or production in the United States under the provision of subheading 9813.00.05, HTSUS (19 U.S.C. 1202).
[T.D. 75-230, 40 FR 43023, Sept. 18, 1975, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51247, Dec. 21, 1988]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-032

February 26, 1997

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has responded to a letter

from the Environmental Protection Agency concerning a regulation

that the NRC is developing on radiological criteria for

decommissioning. The text of the NRC letter is enclosed.
February 21, 1997

The Honorable Carol M. Browner

Administrator

Environmental Protection Agency

Washington, D.C. 20460

Dear Administrator Browner:

I am writing in response to your letter of February 7, 1997 in

which you expressed concern over positions that NRC may be taking

regarding groundwater remediation and cleanup levels in its final

rule on radiological criteria for decommissioning. In

particular, you indicated concern over the possibility that NRC

would increase the 15 mrem/yr dose criterion for license

termination as contained in NRC's proposed rule to up to 30

mrem/yr, and that NRC might delete the separate groundwater

requirements of the proposed rule.

To begin, the Commission believes that the nation deserves a

uniform approach to radiation regulation which protects people

from significant hazard regardless of the source, whether it is

Atomic Energy Act materials, naturally occurring materials, or

other materials, and which focuses regulatory resources on the

most significant hazards. Further, below an upper safety limit,

cost-benefit considerations must apply in site specific

implementation of the radiation protection standards.

The NRC staff is currently engaged in preparing a final rule for

Commission consideration. The Commission wants to assure you

that it will give careful consideration to EPA's views in

reviewing the NRC staff's recommendations for finalizing the

rule, particularly in the matters cited in your February 7

letter. Nonetheless, as you are aware, the NRC staff has

previously briefed the OMB, and I have previously written to

Sally Katzen of OMB, providing the Commission's preliminary view

that the separate groundwater protection requirement may be

deleted, and that the appropriate dose criterion is in the range

between 15 and 30 mrem/yr. Consequently, there is a possibility

that in the final rule, when promulgated, the NRC approach may

differ from what EPA is recommending. However, the Commission

believes that its position on these matters will be consistent

with the above principles, as well as with the proposed Federal

Radiation Protection guidance.
option. contemplated in our 1992 MOU, I am pre

legislation is needed to achieve risk 

EPA-NRC interface issues. In the e

useful, I would be pleased to mee

approach to risk harmonization. 

occurred without progress on r

thorough exchange of views a

rulemaking for some time, a

continuous dialogue on th

and NRC staffs. As you 

I also appreciate the 

rule. take this into co

National Priori

would reconsid

recommendati

We appreci

appropr

guida

enc

vi

Shirley Ann Jackson /s/ Shirley Ann Jackson Sincerely,
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5192 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5192

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
             on the credit for biomass stoves and boilers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 6, 2022

   Mr. King introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
             on the credit for biomass stoves and boilers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED LIMITATION FOR BIOMASS STOVES AND BOILERS UNDER 
              ENERGY EFFICIENT HOME IMPROVEMENT CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 25C(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``shall not, in the aggregate, exceed'' and 
        all that follows and inserting the following: ``shall not 
        exceed--
                    ``(A) with respect to amounts paid or incurred, in 
                the aggregate, for property described in clauses (i) 
                and (ii) of subsection (d)(2)(A), $2,000, and
                    ``(B) with respect to amounts paid or incurred, in 
                the aggregate, for property described in subsection 
                (d)(2)(B), $8,000.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after December 31, 2022.
                                 <all>
```
### [§5063. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–44, title V, §501(e), June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 150]

Section, Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1336; Pub. L. 86–75, §3(b)(1), June 30, 1959, 73 Stat. 157; Pub. L. 86–564, title II, §202(b)(1), June 30, 1960, 74 Stat. 290; Pub. L. 87–72, §3(b)(1), June 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 193; Pub. L. 87–508, §3(b)(1), June 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 114; Pub. L. 88–52, §3(b)(1)(A), June 29, 1963, 77 Stat. 72; Pub. L. 88–348, §2(b)(1)(A), June 30, 1964, 78 Stat. 237, made provision for floor stocks refunds on distilled spirits, wines, cordials, and beer and set out limitations on the eligibility for such refunds or credits.

A prior section 5063, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 615, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising section 5063, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable on and after July 1, 1965, see section 701(d) of Pub. L. 89–44, set out as an Effective Date of 1965 Amendment note under section 5701 of this title.
#### Matthew T. Goldsborough, Jr., Respondent, v. Richard F. Goldsborough, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Hotchkiss, J., not sitting.
#### § 152.8 Application submission and deadline.

In each year that this program is authorized and receives an appropriation, we will announce the grants availability via Notice of Funds Availability. That Notice will contain all pertinent information concerning the eligible funding activities, funding priorities, funding levels, application period, timelines, and deadlines.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.3011 Filing procedures. ( a ) *Place of filing.* A post-importation claim for a refund must be filed with CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically. The post-importation claim may be filed by paper or by the method specified for equivalent reporting via an authorized electronic data interchange system.
( b ) *Contents of claim.* A post-importation claim for a refund must be filed by presentation of the following: ( 1 ) A written or electronic declaration or statement stating that the good was an originating good at the time of importation and setting forth the number and date of the entry or entries covering the good;
( 2 ) A copy of a written or electronic certification prepared in accordance with § 10.3004 if a certification forms the basis for the claim, or other information demonstrating that the good qualifies for preferential tariff treatment;
( 3 ) A written statement indicating whether the importer of the good provided a copy of the entry summary or equivalent documentation to any other person. If such documentation was so provided, the statement must identify each recipient by name, CBP identification number, and address and must specify the date on which the documentation was provided; and
( 4 ) A written statement indicating whether any person has filed a protest relating to the good under any provision of law; and if any such protest has been filed, the statement must identify the protest by number and date.
[77 FR 59069, Sept. 26, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 60193, Oct. 1, 2013]
§ 115.2 Application. ( a ) Certification of containers and road vehicles for international transport under Customs seal is voluntary. This chapter does not require certification of containers and road vehicles.
( b ) The Customs Convention on the International Transport of Goods Under Cover of TIR Carnets (TIR Convention), January 15, 1959 (20 UST 184, TIAS 6633), requires that the approval of road vehicles be made by competent authorities of the country in which the owner or carrier is a resident or is established, and that containers should be either similarly approved, or approved by the competent authority of the country where it is first used for transport under Customs seal. The Customs Convention on Containers, May 18, 1956 (20 UST 301, TIAS 6634), requires that the approval of containers be made by competent authorities of the country in which the owner is a resident or is established or by those of the country where the container is used for the first time for transport under Customs seal. The TIR Convention, 1975, generally provides that a road vehicle, for which approval at a stage after manufacture is desired, shall be approved by the competent authority where the vehicle owner or operator is established or located, or where the vehicle is registered. Such approval under the TIR Convention, 1975, or, for containers, the Customs Convention on Containers, 1972, may be accomplished by the competent authority of the country in which the owner or operator is able to produce the conveyance. The 1975 TIR Convention and the Customs Convention on Containers, 1972, also provide that the Certifying Authority of the country of manufacture, if that country is a contracting party to the Convention, may approve a series of road vehicles or containers presented for design type approval. The procedures for applying for certification are contained in §§ 115.28, 115.38, 115.49, and 115.63 of this part.
### §153. Control of library of House of Representatives

The library of the House of Representatives shall be under the control and direction of the Librarian of Congress, who shall provide all needful books of reference therefor. The librarian, two assistant librarians, and assistant in the library, shall be appointed by the Clerk of the House, with the approval of the Speaker of the House of Representatives. No removals shall be made from the said positions except for cause reported to and approved by the Committee on Rules.

(Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 830, §1, 31 Stat. 964.)
### Part D—Youth Activities
§ 305.4 Projects for design and engineering work. In the case of Public Works Investment Assistance awarded solely for design and engineering work, the following additional application requirements and terms shall apply: ( a ) EDA may determine that a separate Investment for design and engineering is warranted due to the technical complexity or environmental sensitivity of the construction Project;
( b ) The purpose of the Investment may be limited to the development and production of all documents required for the construction of the proposed construction Project in a format and in sufficient quantity to permit advertisement and award of a construction contract soon after securing construction financing for the Project;
( c ) EDA will not disburse any portion of the Investment Assistance until it receives and certifies compliance with the Investment award of all design and engineering contracts; and
( d ) EDA's funding of the Project for design and engineering work does not in any way commit EDA to fund construction of the Project.
Editorial Note on Part 115
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 115 appear at 72 FR 50038, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 115.67 Changes in Contract or bond amount. ( a ) *Increases.* The PSB Surety must process Contract or bond amount increases within its allotment in the same manner as initial guaranteed bond issuances (see § 115.65(c)(1)). The Surety must present checks for additional fees due from the Principal and the Surety on any increases aggregating 25% of the original Contract or bond amount or $500,000, whichever is less, and attach such payments to the respective monthly bordereau. If the additional Principal's fee or Surety's fee is less than $250, such fee is not due until all unpaid increases in such fee aggregate at least $250.
( b ) *Decreases.* If the Contract or bond amount is decreased, SBA will refund to the Principal a proportionate amount of the guarantee fee, and adjust SBA's Premium share accordingly in the ordinary course of business. No refund or adjustment will be made until the amounts to be refunded or rebated, respectively, aggregate at least $250.
[61 FR 3271, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 79 FR 2087, Jan. 13, 2014; 82 FR 39502, Aug. 21, 2017; 87 FR 48084, Aug. 8, 2022]
```

[108th Congress Public Law 491]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ491.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 3973]]

Public Law 108-491
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of the United 
  States for fiscal year 2005. <<NOTE: Dec. 23, 2004 -  [H.R. 5363]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 28 USC 461 note.>> AUTHORIZATION OF SALARY 
            ADJUSTMENTS FOR FEDERAL JUSTICES AND JUDGES.

    Pursuant to section 140 of Public Law 97-92, Justices and judges of 
the United States are authorized during fiscal year 2005 to receive a 
salary adjustment in accordance with section 461 of title 28, United 
States Code.

    Approved December 23, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5363:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Nov. 17, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 8, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
### §1367. Recovery of liability for plan termination

The corporation is authorized to make arrangements with contributing sponsors and members of their controlled groups who are or may become liable under section 1362, 1363, or 1364 of this title for payment of their liability, including arrangements for deferred payment of amounts of liability to the corporation accruing as of the termination date on such terms and for such periods as the corporation deems equitable and appropriate.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title IV, §4067, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 1032; Pub. L. 99–272, title XI, §11016(a)(6)(A), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 271; Pub. L. 100–203, title IX, §9313(b)(6), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–366; Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7893(g)(3), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2448.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1989—Pub. L. 101–239 amended directory language of Pub. L. 99–272, §11016(a)(6)(A)(ii), see 1986 Amendment note below.

1987—Pub. L. 100–203 inserted "or may become" after "who are".

1986—Pub. L. 99–272, §11016(a)(6)(A)(i), (iii), substituted "of liability" for "of employer liability" in section catchline and inserted "of amounts of liability to the corporation accruing as of the termination date" in text.

Pub. L. 99–272, §11016(a)(6)(A)(ii), as amended by Pub. L. 101–239, substituted "contributing sponsors and members of their controlled groups" for "employers".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1989 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–239 effective as if included in the provision of the Single-Employer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99–272, title XI, to which such amendment relates, see section 7893(h) of Pub. L. 101–239, set out as a note under section 1002 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1987 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–203 applicable with respect to plan terminations under section 1341 of this title with respect to which notices of intent to terminate are provided under section 1341(a)(2) of this title after Dec. 17, 1987, see section 9313(c) of Pub. L. 100–203, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–272 effective Jan. 1, 1986, with certain exceptions, see section 11019 of Pub. L. 99–272, set out as a note under section 1341 of this title.
GEORGE W. CLARK,

Appellant,

v.

SOUTHERN LAND CONCEPTS, 

INC., WILLIAM R. WARD AS 

THE OWNER, PRESIDENT, 

SURVEYOR, AND THE 

REGISTERED AGENT FOR THE 

CORPORATION,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2538

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 3, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge.

George W. Clark, pro se, Appellant.

Edmund W. Holt, Pensacola, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
### §1952. Payments from Fund for families of Detective Gibson and Private First Class Chestnut and certain other United States Capitol Police employees

#### (a) In general

Except to the extent used or reserved for use under subsection (b) and subject to the regulations issued under section 1954 of this title, amounts in the Fund shall be paid to the families of Detective John Michael Gibson and Private First Class Jacob Joseph Chestnut of the United States Capitol Police as follows:

(1) Fifty percent of such amounts shall be paid to the widow and children of Detective Gibson.

(2) Fifty percent of such amounts shall be paid to the widow and children of Private First Class Chestnut.

#### (b) Payments for employees killed in the line of duty or sustaining serious line-of-duty injuries

In addition to the amounts paid under subsection (a), and in accordance with the regulations issued under section 1954(b) of this title, amounts in the Fund may be paid to—

(1) families of employees of the United States Capitol Police who were killed in the line of duty; or

(2) employees of the United States Capitol Police who have sustained serious line-of-duty injuries.

(Pub. L. 105–223, §2, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1250; Pub. L. 115–45, §2(a), Aug. 4, 2017, 131 Stat. 956.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 207c–1 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

#### Amendments

2017—Pub. L. 115–45 inserted "and certain other United States Capitol Police employees" at end of section catchline, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, substituted "Except to the extent used or reserved for use under subsection (b) and subject to the regulations" for "Subject to the regulations", and added subsec. (b).