alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 352.1 Definitions. As used in this part, the following terms and concepts are defined: ( a ) *Deputy Administrator* means the Deputy Administrator, National Preparedness Directorate, FEMA or designee.
( b ) *Administrator* means the Administrator, FEMA or designee.
( c ) *EPZ* means Emergency Planning Zone.
( d ) *FEMA* means the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
( e ) *NRC* means the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
( f ) *Regional Administrator* means the Regional Administrator of FEMA or designee.
( g ) *Local government* means boroughs, cities, counties, municipalities, parishes, towns, townships or other local jurisdictions within the plume and ingestion exposure pathway EPZs that have specific roles in emergency planning and preparedness.
( h ) *Decline or fail* means a situation where State or local governments do not participate in preparing offsite emergency plans or have significant planning or preparedness inadequacies and have not demonstrated the commitment or capabilities to correct those inadequacies in a timely manner so as to satisfy NRC licensing requirements.
( i ) *Governor* means the Governor of a State or his/her designee.
( j ) *Certification* means the written justification by a licensee of the need for Federal compensatory assistance. This certification is required to activate the Federal assistance under this part.
( k ) *Responsible local official* means the highest elected official of an appropriate local government.
( l ) *Technical assistance* means services provided by FEMA and other Federal agencies to facilitate offsite radiological emergency planning and preparedness such as: Provision of support for the preparation off site radiological emergency response plans and procedures; FEMA coordination of services from other Federal agencies; provision and interpretation of Federal guidance; provision of Federal and contract personnel to offer advice and recommendations for specific aspects of preparedness such as alert and notification and emergency public information.
( m ) *Federal facilities and resources* means personnel, property (land, buildings, vehicles, equipment), and operational capabilities controlled by the Federal government related to establishing and maintaining radiological emergency response preparedness.
( n ) *Licensee* means the utility which has applied for or has received a license from the NRC to operate a commercial nuclear power plant.
( o ) *Reimbursement* means the payment to FEMA/Federal agencies, jointly or severally, by a licensee and State and local governments for assistance and services provided in processing certifications and implementing Federal compensatory assistance under this part 352.
( p ) *Host FEMA Regional Office* means the FEMA Regional Office that has primary jurisdiction by virtue of the nuclear power plant being located within its geographic boundaries.
( q ) *Command and control* means making and issuing protective action decisions and directing offsite emergency response resources, agencies, and activities.
#### § 70.1 Purpose of part.

The purpose of this part is to provide an administrative procedure whereby the Federal Insurance Administrator will review the scientific or technical submissions of an owner or lessee of property who believes his property has been inadvertently included in designated A, AO, A1-30, AE, AH, A99, AR, AR/A1-30, AR/AE, AR/AO, AR/AH, AR/A, VO, V1-30, VE, and V Zones, as a result of the transposition of the curvilinear line to either street or to other readily identifiable features. The necessity for this part is due in part to the technical difficulty of accurately delineating the curvilinear line on either an FHBM or FIRM. These procedures shall not apply when there has been any alteration of topography since the effective date of the first NFIP map (i.e., FHBM or FIRM) showing the property within an area of special flood hazard. Appeals in such circumstances are subject to the provisions of part 65 of this subchapter.

[62 FR 55718, Oct. 27, 1997]
§ 361.7 General eligible expenditures. ( a ) Expenditures must be for activities described in the statement of work mutually agreed to by FEMA and the State during the annual negotiation process, or for activities that the State agrees to perform as a result of subsequent modifications to that statement of work. These activities shall be consistent with the definition of eligible activities in § 361.2.
( b ) The following is a list of eligible expenditures. When items do not appear on the list they will be considered on a case-by-case basis for policy determinations, based on criteria set forth in § 361.5. All costs must be reasonable, and consistent with OMB Circular A-87. ( 1 ) Direct and indirect salaries or wages (including overtime) of employees hired specifically for carrying out earthquake hazards reduction activities are eligible when engaged in the performance of eligible work.
( 2 ) Reasonable costs for work performed by private contractors on eligible projects contracted for by the State.
( 3 ) Travel costs and per diem costs of State employees not to exceed the actual subsistence expense basis for the permanent or temporary activity, as determined by the State's cost principles governing travel.
( 4 ) Non-expendable personal property, office supplies, and supplies for workshops; exhibits.
( 5 ) A maximum of $8,000 or 10 percent of the total project allocation, whichever is less, may be expended for personal computer equipment in the first year of program funding. A full-time earthquake staff person must be employed and the equipment must be dedicated entirely to the earthquake project.
( 6 ) Meetings and conferences, when the primary purpose is dissemination of information relating to the earthquake hazards reduction project.
( 7 ) Training which directly benefits the conduct of earthquake hazards reduction activities.
#### Joe Gould, Respondent, v. Michael S. Jacobs, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
§ 333.35 Mandatory acceptance of an allocation order. ( a ) Except as otherwise specified in this section, a person must accept and comply with every allocation order received.
( b ) A person must not discriminate against an allocation order in any manner such as by charging higher prices for materials, services, or facilities covered by the order or by imposing terms and conditions for contracts and orders involving allocated materials, services, or facilities that differ from the person's terms and conditions for contracts and orders for the materials, services, or facilities prior to receiving the allocation order.
( c ) If a person is unable to comply fully with the required action(s) specified in an allocation order, the person must notify FEMA immediately, explain the extent to which compliance is possible, and give the reasons why full compliance is not possible. If notification is given verbally, written, electronic confirmation must be provided within 24 hours. Such notification does not release the person from complying with the order to the fullest extent possible, until the person is notified by FEMA that the order has been changed or cancelled.
§ 67.5 Right of appeal. ( a ) Any owner or lessee of real property, within a community where a proposed flood elevation determination has been made pursuant to section 1363 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, who believes his property rights to be adversely affected by the Federal Insurance Administrator's proposed determination, may file a written appeal of such determination with the CEO, or such agency as he shall publicly designate, within ninety days of the second newspaper publication of the Federal Insurance Administrator's proposed determination.
( b ) [Reserved]
[41 FR 46989, Oct. 26, 1976. Redesignated at 44 FR 31177, May 31, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 44553, Sept. 29, 1983; 49 FR 4751, Feb. 8, 1984]
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allegro Biodiesel Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, W. Bruce Comer III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ W. Bruce Comer IIIW. Bruce Comer IIIChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)August 12, 2009





A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 72.4 Submittal/payment procedures and FEMA response. ( a ) The initial fee shall be submitted with a request for FEMA review and processing of CLOMRs, LOMRs, and PMRs based on structural measures on alluvial fans; the appropriate flat user fee shall be submitted with all other requests for FEMA review and processing.
( b ) FEMA must receive initial or flat user fees before it will begin any review. The fee is non-refundable once FEMA begins its review.
( c ) Following completion of FEMA's review for any CLOMR, LOMR, or PMR based on structural measures on alluvial fans, FEMA shall invoice the requester at the established hourly rate for any actual costs exceeding the initial fee incurred for review and processing. FEMA shall not issue a determination letter or revised map panel(s) until it receives the invoiced amount.
( d ) For all map revision requests, FEMA shall bear the cost of reprinting and distributing the revised FIRM panel(s), FBFM panel(s), or combination.
( e ) The entity that applies to FEMA through the local community for review is responsible for the cost of the review. The local community incurs no financial obligation under the reimbursement procedures of this part when another party sends the application to FEMA.
( f ) Requesters shall submit payments by check or money order or by credit card. Checks or money orders, in U.S. funds, shall be made payable to the National Flood Insurance Program.
( g ) For CLOMA, CLOMR-F, LOMA, and LOMR-F requests, FEMA shall: ( 1 ) Notify the requester and community within 30 days as to the adequacy of the submittal, and
( 2 ) Provide to the requester and the community, within 60 days of receipt of adequate information and fee, a determination letter or other written comment in response to the request.
( h ) For CLOMR, LOMR, and PMR requests, FEMA shall: ( 1 ) Notify the requester and community within 60 days as to the adequacy of the submittal; and
( 2 ) Provide to the requester and the community, within 90 days of receipt of adequate information and fee, a CLOMR, a LOMR, other written comment in response to the request, or preliminary copies of the revised FIRM panels, FBFM panels, and/or affected portions of the FIS report for review and comment.
[62 FR 5737, Feb. 6, 1997]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-116 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, July 9, 1998)

CHAIRMAN TO BE INDUCTED INTO NATIONAL WOMEN’S HALL OF FAME

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson will be inducted

into the National Women’s Hall of Fame along with 20 other distinguished American

women at a ceremony in Seneca Falls, N.Y. on Saturday. Among others to be

honored will be Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, poet Maya Angelou, and

astronaut Shannon Lucid. The ceremony commemorates the 150th anniversary of the

first Women’s Rights Convention.

The Chairman was selected based on her significant contributions to science, to

the progress and freedom of women and minorities, and the enduring value of her

achievements in business, education, and government..

Dr. Jackson was appointed Chairman of the NRC by President Bill Clinton July 1,

1995 and is the principal executive officer and official spokesman for the agency. The

NRC, an independent Federal agency of about 3,000 employees, is responsible for the

protection of public health and safety in the commercial uses of nuclear materials,

including the production of nuclear energy.

A native of Washington, D.C., Dr. Jackson has achieved a number of firsts in her

career. She is the first African-American woman to receive a doctorate from the

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); she is the first African-American to serve

on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; and she is both the first woman and the first

African-American to serve as the Chairman of the NRC.

Chairman Jackson earned a Bachelor of Science degree in physics and a Ph.D.

in theoretical elementary particle physics, both from MIT. She holds five honorary

doctoral degrees from other distinguished universities and colleges. Highlights of her

career include conducting research in theoretical physics at AT&T Bell Laboratories in

Murray Hill, New Jersey, Professor of Physics at Rutgers University in Piscataway, N.J.,

and serving on the boards of directors of several notable businesses in New Jersey,

including a subsidiary organization of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, and as

a Life Member of the M.I.T. Corporation (Board of Trustees) since 1992.
|                                                                              |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Advanced Search
 
**Agent Destruction Status***Click Graph for Details* | Tooele Publications  |
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.1720 SBA's right to review Pool Loan documents.

In the event that SBA purchases a Loan Interest in Seller's Pool Loan, Seller must provide to SBA copies of the Pool Loan collateral documents, Pool Loan underwriting documents, and any other documents SBA may require in writing within 15 calendar days of a written request from SBA (which SBA will review in connection with its efforts to determine if Seller is obligated to reimburse SBA pursuant to this subpart). A Seller's failure to provide the requested documentation may constitute a material failure to comply with the Program Rules and Regulations and may lead to an action for recovery under § 120.1719. SBA will also evaluate a Seller's continued participation in the Program and may restrict further sales under the Program until SBA determines that the Seller has provided sufficient documentation.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲
▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****Annual report FY...**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2005
 
SuDoc:ID 1.27:B 92/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000637870
 
October 31, 2017
### SUBCHAPTER IV—MAJORITY AND MINORITY SECRETARIES, CONFERENCES, AND POLICY COMMITTEES
### §127a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 127a was editorially reclassified as section 5342 of this title.
Exhibit 23








**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**














The Board of Directors


YP Corp.:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of YP Corp., f/k/a YP.Net, Inc., on Form S-8 (File No. 333-107721) filed as of August 7, 2003, of our report dated December 9, 2004, on the consolidated balance sheet of YP Corp. as of September 30, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended September 30, 2004, which report appears in YP Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.





/s/ Epstein, Weber & Conover P.L.C.





Scottsdale, Arizona


December 9, 2004


|
|
|
|

|
|
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7576

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. IESHA NICOLE ARMSTRONG , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. ( 8:16

- cr - 00601

- TDC

- 1 )

Submitted : December 17, 2021 Decided: December 29, 2021

Before KING and DIAZ , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curium opinion

.
Iesha Nicole Armstrong , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Iesha Nicole Armstrong appeals the district court ’s orders denying her motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239 , and denying her second motion for compassionate release, which t he court construed as a motion for reconsideration. We review the denial of a motion for compassionate release for abuse
of discretion

. United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) , cert. denied , 142 S. Ct.
383 (2021)

. Upon review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Armstrong’s motions based on its consideration of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)
factors. See United States v. High , 997 F.3d 181, 187 (4th Cir. 2021). Accordingly, we deny Armstrong’s motion for a ppointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order s
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7198

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JAMAL MITCHELL, a/k/a Boo , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. ( 1:02

- cr
- 00025

- TSE

- 1 )

Submitted : January 17, 2020 Decided: January 30, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jamal Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying Mitchell’s motions to amend his forfeiture order, to return real property, and to vacate a stipulation and settlement agreement . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mitchell , No.
1:02

- cr
- 00025

- TSE

- 1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 6, 2019) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
§ 107.835 Exceptions to minimum duration/term of Financing. You may make a Short-term Financing for a term less than one year if the Financing is: ( a ) An interim Financing in contemplation of long-term Financing. The contemplated long-term Financing must be in an amount at least equal to the short-term Financing, and must be made by you alone or in participation with other investors; or
( b ) For protection of your prior investment(s); or
( c ) For the purpose of Financing a change of ownership under § 107.750. The total amount of such Financings may not exceed 20 percent of your Loans and Investments (at cost) at the end of any fiscal year; or
( d ) For the purpose of aiding a Small Business in performing a contract awarded under a Federal, State, or local government set-aside program for “minority” or “disadvantaged” contractors.
[61 FR 3189, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 52646, Sept. 30, 1999; 69 FR 8098, Feb. 23, 2004]
#### Frank Duke v. American Museum of Natural History.

Motion granted. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### Aubrey v. Oak.

Oct. 23, 1945.

*670R. J. Wade for appellant.

R. L. Hardin and William G. Reed for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Rees

Affirming.

On July 3, 1945, Ora Oak filed with, the clerk of the Carroll county court his notification and declaration for the Democratic nomination for the office of magistrate in the Second Magisterial District of Carroll county. No other candidate filed nomination papers within,the time required by law, and on July 7, 1945, the county clerk issued to Oak a certificate of nomination. On July 15th Arthur Aubrey, a citizen and resident of Carroll county and a legal voter in Magisterial District No. 2, brought an action against Ora Oak and C. S. Griffith, the county clerk, in which he asked that the clerk of the Carroll county court be enjoined from causing the name of Ora Oak to be printed on the official ballots in the regular. November, 1945, election. He alleged in his petition that the notification and declaration filed by Oak on July 3, 1945, was void because it failed to contain all the necessary matter set out in KRS 119.050. Oak had filed a supplemental notification and declaration on July 9, 1945, in which he set out the omitted matter, but it is unnecessary to determine whether or not he had the right at that time to amend the nominating papers filed on July 3rd. On August 14,1945, the defendant moved the. court to. dismiss the petition, and the motion was sustained and the petition was dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff had no right to maintain the action.

In Hettel v. Furste, 260 Ky. 844, 86 S. W. 2d 1018, a resident and voter of a magisterial district sought to enjoin the county clerk from causing the name of Edward R. Manson to be printed on the official ballots in the regular November, 1935, election as the Democratic candidate for the office of magistrate in the district on the ground that Manson’s notification and declaration for the nomination was void because one of the two electors who signed the accompanying affidavit had not been sworn by any officer authorized to administer an oath. It was held the plaintiff had no right to maintain the action. In Davis v. Stahl, 287 Ky. 629, 154 S. W. 2d 736, the court held that a citizen and voter could not contest *671the nomination of a candidate for a county or city office at a primary election on the ground that he had violated the Corrupt Practice Act, KRS 123.010 et seq. Cf. Dietz v. Zimmer, 231 Ky. 546, 549, 21 S. W. 2d 999.

On the authority of the foregoing cases and Little v. Bogie, 300 Ky. 668, 190 S. W. 2d 26, the judgment is affirmed.