alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 200 (Monday, October 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23227]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Special Medical Advisory Group; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Special Medical 
Advisory Group will meet on November 12, 2004. The meeting will be held 
in Room 830, at VA Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC, from 9 a.m. until 3 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Group is to advise the Secretary and Under 
Secretary for Health on the care and treatment of disabled veterans, 
and other matters pertinent to the Veterans Health Administration 
(VHA). The agenda for the meeting will include discussions on 
electronic health records, research, recruitment and compensation of 
health care professionals, special programs, care coordination and VA's 
Care Model.
    Any member of the public wishing to attend should contact Juanita 
Leslie, Office of Administrative Operations (10B2), Veterans Health 
Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs at (202) 273-5882. No 
time will be set aside at this meeting for receiving oral presentations 
from the public. Statements, in written form, may be submitted to 
Juanita Leslie before the meeting or within 10 days after the meeting.

    Dated: October 12, 2004.

    By Direction of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-23227 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
§ 334.2 Policy. ( a ) As established in Executive Order 12656, the policy of the United States is to have sufficient emergency response capabilities at all levels of government to meet essential defense and civilian needs during any national security emergency. Accordingly, each Federal department and agency shall prepare its national security emergency preparedness plans and programs to respond adequately and in a timely manner to all national security emergencies.
( b ) As part of emergency response, the GMR system should be incorporated in each department's and agency's emergency preparedness plans and programs to provide appropriate and effective response options for consideration in reacting to ambiguous and specific warnings.
( c ) Departments and agencies will be provided early warning information developed by the intelligence community and policy statements of the President.
( d ) Emergency resource preparedness planning is essential to ensure that the nation is adequately prepared to respond to potential national emergencies. Such emergency resource preparedness planning requires an exchange of information and planning factors among the various departments and agencies responsible for different resource preparedness actitivities.
( e ) To carry out their emergency planning activities, civilian departments and agencies require the Department of Defense's (DOD) assessment of potential military demands that would be made on the economy in a full range of possible national security emergencies. Similarly, DOD planning should be conducted using planning regimes consistent with the policies and plans of the civilian resource departments and agencies.
( f ) Under section 104(c) of Executive Order 12656, FEMA is responsible for coordinating the implementation of national emergency preparedness policy with Federal departments and agencies and with state and local governments and, therefore, is responsible for developing a system of planning procedures for integrating the emergency preparedness actions of federal, state and local governments.
( g ) Federal departments and agencies shall design their preparedness measures to permit a rapid and effective transition from routine to emergency operations, and to make effective use of the period following initial indication of a probable national security emergency. This will include: ( 1 ) Development of a system of emergency actions that defines alternatives, processes, and issues to be considered during various stages of national security emergencies; and
( 2 ) Identification of actions that could be taken at the Federal and local levels of government in the early stages of a national security emergency or pending national security emergency to mitigate the impact of or reduce significantly the leadtime associated with full emergency action implementation.
#### § 333.84 Severability.

FEMA intends the various provisions of this part to be severable from each other to the extent practicable, such that if a court of competent jurisdiction were to vacate or enjoin any one provision, the other provisions are intended to remain in effect unless they are dependent upon the vacated or enjoined provision.
March 23 , 2015

Mr. Jeremy Mayhew

15 Sara Drive

Temple, NH 03084

Dear Mr. Mayhew :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your December 2 9 , 2014 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

20 14

- 110 7 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent

does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days bef ore the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 26 7

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### Rock Island Butter Company v. James Rowland.

Motion denied, with

ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### Ivar Arndt, Appellant, v. Nicholas T. Risenberger, Respondent.

Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ.
#### Armstrong v. Commonwealth.

June 22, 1945.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Duncan *&*Duncan and J. A. Flowers for movant.

Mdon S. Dummit, Attorney General, and H. K. Spear, Assistant Attorney General, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed.
#### Crete Mills v. Fred Colin, Impleaded with Others.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
§ 3903.54 Waiver, suspension, or reduction of rental or payments in lieu of production, or reduction of royalty, or waiver of royalty in the first 5 years of the lease. ( a ) In order to encourage the maximum economic recovery (MER) of the leased mineral(s), and in the interest of conservation, whenever the BLM determines it is necessary to promote development or finds that leases cannot be successfully operated under the lease terms, the BLM may waive, suspend, or reduce the rental or payment in lieu of production, reduce the rate of royalty, or in the first 5 years of the lease, waive the royalty.
( b ) Applications for waivers, suspension or reduction of rentals or payment in lieu of production, reduction in royalty, or waiver of royalty for the first 5 years of the lease must contain the serial number of the lease, the name of the record title holder, the operator or sub-lessee, a description of the lands by legal subdivision, and the following information: ( 1 ) The location of each oil shale mine or operation, and include: ( i ) A map showing the extent of the mining or development operations;
( ii ) A tabulated statement of the minerals mined and subject to royalty for each month covering a period of not less than 12 months immediately preceding the date of filing of the application; and
( iii ) The average production per day mined for each month, and complete information as to why the minimum production was not attained;
( 2 ) Each application must contain: ( i ) A detailed statement of expenses and costs of operating the entire lease;
( ii ) The income from the sale of any leased products;
( iii ) All facts showing whether the mines can be successfully operated under the royalty or rental fixed in the lease; and
( iv ) Where the application is for a reduction in royalty, information as to whether royalties or payments out of production are paid to anyone other than the United States, the amounts so paid, and efforts made to reduce those payments;
( 3 ) Any overriding royalties cannot be greater in aggregate than one-half the royalties paid to the United States.
( c ) Contact the proper BLM office for detailed information on submitting copies of these applications electronically.
#### § 206.341 Policy.

It shall be the policy of FEMA to achieve the goals of CBRA in carrying out disaster relief on units of the Coastal Barrier Resources System. It is FEMA's intent that such actions be consistent with the purpose of CBRA to minimize the loss of human life, the wasteful expenditure of Federal revenues, and the damage to fish, wildlife and other natural resources associated with coastal barriers along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts and to consider the means and measures by which the long-term conservation of these fish, wildlife, and other natural resources may be achieved under the Stafford Act.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________
No. 96-40655

____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MOSES ROGERS,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

( 9-95-CR-26-1 )

__________________________________________

February 18, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM * :
Moses Rogers appeals his sentence after being convicted on a
guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute cocaine. He
challenges his base offense level; the two-level increase for
possession of a firearm and the two-level increase for reckless

endangerment; and the denial of a three-level dec rease for
acceptance of responsibility.The district court did not clearly err either in calculating

Rogers’ base offense level by includi ng all drug quantities

comprising his relevan t conduct, U nited States v. Vital
, 68 F.3d

114, 118, 120 (5th cir. 1995), or in finding that Rogers’
possession of a firearm was relevant conduct. U nited States v.

Paulk , 917 F.2d 879, 884 (5th Cir. 1990). And, the court did not

commit reve rsible error by finding that Rogers’ reckless

endangerment was part of the same course of conduct as the offense

of conviction. S ee Vital 68 F.3d at 120. Finally, it did not err

in denying Ro gers a decrease for acceptance of responsibility,
because Rogers continued to engage in the same course of criminal
conduct and he contested his involvement in offenses constituting

relevant conduct. See Un ited States v. Smith , 13 F.3d 860, 866

(5th Cir.), cert. denied , 114 S.Ct. 2151 (1994).

Accordingly, Rogers’ sentence is

AFFIRMED

.
§ 123.303 How can my business spend my economic injury disaster loan? ( a ) You can only use the loan proceeds for working capital necessary to carry your concern until resumption of normal operations and for expenditures necessary to alleviate the specific economic injury, but not to exceed that which the business could have provided had the injury not occurred. COVID EIDL loan proceeds also may be used to make debt payments including monthly payments, payment of deferred interest, and pre-payments on any business debts, except pre-payments are not permitted on any loans owned by a Federal agency (including SBA) or a Small Business Investment Company licensed under the Small Business Investment Act.
( b ) Loan proceeds may not be used to: ( 1 ) Refinance indebtedness which you incurred prior to the disaster event;
( 2 ) Except for COVID EIDL loan proceeds, make payments on loans owned by a Federal agency (including SBA) or a Small Business Investment Company licensed under the Small Business Investment Act;
( 3 ) Pay, directly or indirectly, any obligations resulting from a federal, state or local tax penalty as a result of negligence or fraud, or any non-tax criminal fine, civil fine, or penalty for non-compliance with a law, regulation, or order of a federal, state, regional, or local agency or similar matter;
( 4 ) Repair physical damage; or
( 5 ) Pay dividends or other disbursements to owners, partners, officers or stockholders, except for reasonable remuneration directly related to their performance of services for the business.
[61 FR 3304, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 86 FR 50219, Sept. 8, 2021]
### §1495. Damages for unjust conviction and imprisonment; claim against United States

The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim for damages by any person unjustly convicted of an offense against the United States and imprisoned.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 941; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §133(c)(1), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 729 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Crimes and Criminal Procedure (May 24, 1938, ch. 266, §§1–4, 52 Stat. 438).

Only the jurisdictional provision of section 729 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., appears in this section. The remainder is incorporated in section 2513 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "United States Claims Court" for "Court of Claims".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.
§ 400.202 Loan amount. ( a ) The aggregate amount of loan principal guaranteed under this Program to a single Qualified Steel Company may not exceed $ 250 million.
( b ) Of the aggregate amount of loans authorized to be guaranteed and outstanding at any one time, not more than $30 million shall be loans to iron ore companies.
### §7517. Furnishing on request of statement explaining estate or gift valuation

#### (a) General rule

If the Secretary makes a determination or a proposed determination of the value of an item of property for purposes of the tax imposed under chapter 11, 12, or 13, he shall furnish, on the written request of the executor, donor, or the person required to make the return of the tax imposed by chapter 13 (as the case may be), to such executor, donor, or person a written statement containing the material required by subsection (b). Such statement shall be furnished not later than 45 days after the later of the date of such request or the date of such determination or proposed determination.

#### (b) Contents of statement

A statement required to be furnished under subsection (a) with respect to the value of an item of property shall—

(1) explain the basis on which the valuation was determined or proposed,

(2) set forth any computation used in arriving at such value, and

(3) contain a copy of any expert appraisal made by or for the Secretary.

#### (c) Effect of statement

Except to the extent otherwise provided by law, the value determined or proposed by the Secretary with respect to which a statement is furnished under this section, and the method used in arriving at such value, shall not be binding on the Secretary.

(Added Pub. L. 94–455, title XX, §2008(a)(1), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1891.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 94–455, title XX, §2008(d)(1), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1892, as amended by Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095, provided that: "The amendments made by subsection (a) [enacting this section and amending sections 2031 and 2512 of this title]—

"(A) insofar as they relate to the tax imposed under chapter 11 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [formerly I.R.C. 1954, section 2001 et seq. of this title], shall apply to the estates of decedents dying after December 31, 1976, and

"(B) insofar as they relate to the tax imposed under chapter 12 of such Code [section 2501 et seq. of this title], shall apply to gifts made after December 31, 1976."
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-81 July 11, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

ClARIFICATION: PLEASE NOTE LAST PARAGRAPH REGARDING WHERE TO CALL

RADIOACTIVE SOURCE BELIEVED LEFT AT DELAWARE JOB SITE

Ambric Engineering, Incorporated, of Philadelphia has told

the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that the radioactive source

from a portable gauge apparently was left at a job site in

Claymont, De., on June 25.

The company was using the moisture-density gauge at the

Bally Mead development on Delaware state route 92 on June 25.

Following that work, Ambric Engineering sent the gauge to its

manufacturer for maintenance. On July 10, the manufacturer

notified Ambric that the source rod was missing from the gauge.

The source, which is a small, less than half-inch, steel capsule,

was 6 millicuries of cesium-137. It’s believed the source broke

off at the job site.

Ambric has hired a contractor to perform surveys to locate

the missing sealed source. To date, these efforts have not been

successful in locating the source rod. An NRC inspector was sent

to the site on July 10 to review licensee actions and to follow

up on the loss of the source.

It is possible that the source rod may have broken off at

the job site and been picked up by a member of the public. Any

attempt to tamper with the radioactive source would subject a

person to radiation exposure. Handling the source would carry a

risk of radiation injury.

Anyone seeing the source should leave it alone and report

its location to the NRC Operations Center at (301) 816-5100. The

Operations Center will accept collect calls regarding this

matter.

#
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-47 April 29, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC STAFF PROPOSES FINE AGAINST WASHINGTON, D.C. HOSPITAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a

$2,750 fine against Washington Hospital Center for six

violations of NRC requirements. The violations, which

collectively represent a breakdown in control of licensed

activities, were found during a February inspection of the

Washington, D.C., facility.

NRC inspectors found that radioactive waste was often

mixed with other waste and then taken to the hospital’s

incinerator, which was not licensed for disposing of

radioactive materials. When the incinerator’s process

radiation detector alarmed, indicating the presence of

radioactive material, the untrained workers often attempted

to determine the cause of the alarm by sorting through the

waste, creating the potential for personal contamination.

The NRC staff has cited the hospital for six

violations: the disposal of radioactive material by

incineration; the failure to perform adequate surveys to

identify the type and activity of the material after the

process radiation detector alarmed; failure to train

personnel who were handling radioactive waste; failure by

workers to wear gloves when handling radioactive waste; and

two violations related to the failure to maintain

appropriate security and control of radioactive waste.

In a letter to the hospital, NRC Region I Administrator

Hubert J. Miller said, “These violations demonstrate that a

significant weakness existed with respect to attention to,

and control of, radioactive material waste activities at

Washington Hospital Center.”

He noted that a confirmatory action letter was issued
in March, documenting the hospital’s commitments to correct

the identified deficiencies and take appropriate action to

prevent recurrence. Mr. Miller added that hospital

officials have stopped incinerating radioactive waste and

have taken other corrective actions, including hiring a

consultant to evaluate conditions at the facility,

increasing the radiation safety staff and retraining the

staff.

The hospital has 30 days to pay the proposed fine or to

request in writing that all or part of it be withdrawn.

#