alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2





Ener1,
      Inc.


500
      West
      Cypress Creek Road, Suite 100


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309




November
      14, 2007





Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549





Re:
      Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350





Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1,
      Inc.,
      for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission, I, Gerard Herlihy, Chief Financial Officer of Ener1, Inc.,
      hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            such
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended
                September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
                78o(d));
                and





2)
            the
                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
                Ener1,
                Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, fairly presents,
                in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                Ener1, Inc.




/s/
                Gerard HerlihyGerard
                Herlihy
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              (Duly
                Authorized Principal Financial and
              Accounting
                Officer and Duly Authorized
                Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
      retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.





This
      certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to Ener1, Inc.’s
      quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
      to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
      reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
      except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
      filing.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00240-CV

In re Lisa Laser USA, Inc. and Lisa Laser Products, OHG.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

We grant the real party in interest’s motion to strike, and we deny the petition for writ

of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3, 52.7, 52.8(a). The stay order issued April 30, 2009,

is lifted.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Patterson and Henson

Filed: May 15, 2009
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear at 68 FR 51349, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 117.18 Judicial review. ( a ) The complainant may file a civil action following the exhaustion of administrative remedies under the Act. Administrative remedies are exhausted if: ( 1 ) 180 days have elapsed since the complainant filed the complaint and the Agency has made no finding with regard to the complaint; or
( 2 ) The Agency has issued a finding in favor of the recipient.
( b ) If the Agency fails to make a finding within 180 days or issues a finding in favor of the recipient, the Agency shall: ( 1 ) Advise the complainant of this fact;
( 2 ) Advise the complainant of the right to file a civil action for injunctive relief; and
( 3 ) Inform the complainant: ( i ) That the complainant may bring a civil action only in a United States district court for the district in which the recipient is found or transacts business;
( ii ) That a complainant prevailing in a civil action has the right to be awarded the costs of the action, including reasonable attorney's fees, but that the complainant must demand these costs in the complaint;
( iii ) That before commencing the action the complainant shall give 30 days notice by registered mail to the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, the Attorney General of the United States and the recipient;
( iv ) That the notice must state: The alleged violation of the Act; the relief requested; the court in which the complainant is bringing the action; and whether or not attorney's fees are demanded in the event the complainant prevails; and
( v ) That the complainant may not bring an action if the same alleged violation of the Act by the same recipient is the subject of a pending action in any court of the United States.
Date: Subject:



### From: To: August 2, 2012 Information onnon-PFOS Fume Suppressants inMinnesota Chromium Electroplating Facilities Project Team Docket The purpose ofthis memorandum is to summarize the dataregarding non-perfluorooctyl sulfonates (PFOS) fume suppressants received from the industry association, the State of Minnesota, and facilities in Minnesota. 

### I. Background The state ofMinnesotarequired chromium electroplating facilities that used a PFOS fume suppressant to switch to a non-PFOS based fume suppressant in2008. A summary ofthe questions, the plants contacted, and the responses are included inTable 1. Table 2 is a list of surface tension readings at a facility. Table 3 is a list ofsurface tensionreadings at a facility along with the amount ofnon-PFOS fume suppressant added to the tank.
Amtrak Clip #2 (Transfer Table Manual Deploy-Retract)(5 MB)

The video clip of about 50 seconds shows three individuals using a hand crank to easily deploy 

and retract a transfer table inside a test facility. The transfer table is part of a mockup rail 

platform and deploys about three feet to bridge the gap between the platform and a simulation 

rail car. The video clip was used during Amtrak’s educational presentation on the Gap 

Mitigation-Elimination Program. The presentation was made on April 10, 2014, during the third 

meeting of the Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee. The clip has no audible part.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23013]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: International Trade Commission.

TIME AND DATE: October 18, 2004 at 11 a.m.

PLACE:  Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Agenda for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-776-779 (Review) (Certain Preserved Mushrooms 
From Chile, China, India, and Indonesia)--briefing and vote. (The 
Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and 
Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before 
October 28, 2004.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: (1) Document No. GC-04-114 
concerning proposed rulemaking and changes in Agency procedures.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: October 7, 2004.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-23013 Filed 10-8-04; 11:10 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### § 295.1 Purpose.

This part implements the Cerro Grande Fire Assistance Act (CGFAA), Public Law 106-246, 114 Stat. 584, which requires that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) establish a process to evaluate, process and pay claims injuries and property damage resulting from the Cerro Grande Fire.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Willbros Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
F. Curran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael F. Curran
---------------------------

Michael F. Curran
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002
The IMO proposal notes that it may be appropriate to have a more demanding target for 

new ship designs and that individual annual fatality risks should be: 

g. Below 1E-4 for crew, and 

h. Below 1E-5 for passengers and public ashore. 

Note that the IMO criteria are for individual annual fatality risks, whereas the Standard 

sets limits for cumulative probability of impact with debris capable of causing a ship accident. 

Since only a fraction of the impacts capable of causing a ship accident are expected to produce 

a fatality, the 1E-5 probability of impact criterion standard appears to be conservative relative to 

the IMO criteria. 

The standard criteria for protecting ships are consistent with criteria used by six of the 

national ranges as shown in Table 5-27. Note that the standard criterion for hazard ship areas 

limits the cumulative probability of impact of debris capable of causing a ship accident. The 

Eastern and Western Ranges have used the same approach and numerical values to define hazard 

areas for non-mission ships. Other ranges, such as the Reagan Test Site, have set lower 

probability of impact limits for individual ships instead. The standard criteria allow mission 

essential and critical operations ships to be exposed to a probability of impact that is ten times 

higher than the general public, consistent with the rationale provided in Section 5.3.4. 

TABLE 5-27. SHIP RISK CRITERIA OF NATIONAL RANGES 

Range Criteria for Mission 

Essential Ships 

Criteria for Non-Mission 

Essential Ships 

Eastern Range 1E-5* 1E-5* 

Eglin AFB 2 - 3 sigma hazard area cleared for all ships 

Reagan Test Site 1E-6 1E-6 

NAWC - Point Mugu 1E-5 1E-6 

PMRF  Barking 

S d

1E-5 1E-6 

Wallops Flight 

FFFFF ili

1E-5 1E-5 

Western Range 1E-5* 1E-5* 

Commonality Criteria 1E-4* 1E-5*

* Risk expressed in terms of cumulative probability of impact 

5-51
§ 206.253 Insurance requirements for facilities damaged by disasters other than flood. ( a ) Prior to approval of a Federal grant for the restoration of a facility and its contents which were damaged by a disaster other than flood, the recipient shall notify the Regional Administrator of any entitlement to insurance settlement or recovery for such facility and its contents. The Regional Administrator shall reduce the eligible costs by the actual amount of insurance proceeds relating to the eligible costs.
( b ) ( 1 ) Assistance under section 406 of the Stafford Act will be approved only on the condition that the recipient obtain and maintain such types and amounts of insurance as are reasonable and necessary to protect against future loss to such property from the types of hazard which caused the major disaster. The extent of insurance to be required will be based on the eligible damage that was incurred to the damaged facility as a result of the major disaster. The Regional Administrator shall not require greater types and extent of insurance than are certified as reasonable by the State Insurance Commissioner.
( 2 ) Due to the high cost of insurance, some applicants may request to insure the damaged facilities under a blanket insurance policy covering all their facilities, an insurance pool arrangement, or some combination of these options. Such an arrangement may be accepted for other than flood damages. However, if the same facility is damaged in a similar future disaster, eligible costs will be reduced by the amount of eligible damage sustained on the previous disaster.
( c ) The Regional Administrator shall notify the recipient of the type and amount of insurance required. The recipient may request that the State Insurance Commissioner review the type and extent of insurance required to protect against future loss to a disaster-damaged facility, the Regional Administrator shall not require greater types and extent of insurance than are certified as reasonable by the State Insurance Commissioner.
( d ) The requirements of section 311 of the Stafford Act are waived when eligible costs for an insurable facility do not exceed $5,000. The Regional Administrator may establish a higher waiver amount based on hazard mitigation initiatives which reduce the risk of future damages by a disaster similar to the one which resulted in the major disaster declaration which is the basis for the application for disaster assistance.
( e ) The recipient shall provide assurances that the required insurance coverage will be maintained for the anticipated life of the restorative work or the insured facility, whichever is the lesser.
( f ) No assistance shall be provided under section 406 of the Stafford Act for any facility for which assistance was provided as a result of a previous major disaster unless all insurance required by FEMA as a condition of the previous assistance has been obtained and maintained.
[56 FR 64560, Dec. 11, 1991, as amended at 82 FR 44, Jan. 3, 2017]
§ 59.4 References. ( a ) The following are statutory references for the National Flood Insurance Program, under which these regulations are issued: ( 1 ) National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (title XIII of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968), Pub. L. 90-448, approved August 1, 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 *et seq.*
( 2 ) Housing and Urban Development Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91-152, approved December 24, 1969).
( 3 ) Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 980), Public Law 93-234, approved December 31, 1973.
( 4 ) Section 816 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (87 Stat. 975), Public Law 93-383, approved August 22, 1974.
( 5 ) Public Law 5-128 (effective October 12, 1977).
( 6 ) The above statutes are included in 42 U.S.C. 4001 *et seq.*
( b ) The following are references relevant to the National Flood Insurance Program: ( 1 ) Executive Order 11988 (Floodplain Management, dated May 24, 1977 (42 FR 26951, May 25, 1977)).
( 2 ) The Flood Control Act of 1960 (Pub. L. 86-645).
( 3 ) Title II, section 314 of title III and section 406 of title IV of the Disaster Relief Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-288).
( 4 ) Coastal Zone Management Act (Pub. L. 92-583), as amended Public Law 94-370.
( 5 ) Water Resources Planning Act (Pub. L. 89-90), as amended Public Law 94-112 (October 16, 1975).
( 6 ) Title I, National Environmental Policy Act (Pub. L. 91-190).
( 7 ) Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (Pub. L. 89-578), and subsequent amendments thereto.
( 8 ) Water Resources Council, Principals and Standards for Planning, Water and Related Land Resources (38 FR 24778-24869, September 10, 1973).
( 9 ) Executive Order 11593 (Protection and Enchancement of the Cultural Environment), dated May 13, 1971 (36 FR 8921, May 15, 1971).
( 10 ) 89th Cong., 2nd Session, H.D. 465.
( 11 ) Required land use element for comprehensive planning assistance under section 701 of the Housing Act of 1954, as amended by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (24 CFR 600.72).
( 12 ) Executive Order 11990 (Protection of Wetlands, dated May 24, 1977 (42 FR 26951, May 25, 1977)).
( 13 ) Water Resources Council (Guidance for Floodplain Management) (42 FR 52590, September 30, 1977).
( 14 ) Unified National Program for Floodplain Management of the United States Water Resources Council, July 1976.
( c ) The following reference guidelines represent the views of the Federal Insurance Administration with respect to the mandatory purchase of flood insurance under section 102 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973: Mandatory Purchase of Flood Insurance Guidelines (54 FR 29666-29695, July 13, 1989).
[41 FR 46968, Oct. 26, 1976, as amended at 43 FR 7140, Feb. 17, 1978. Redesignated at 44 FR 31177, May 31, 1979, and amended at 57 FR 19540, May 7, 1992]
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

$1.7B

 BUDGET

OPERATIONAL

PROGRAMS

PLANT 

HEALTH

ANIMAL 

HEALTH

WILDLIFE 

DAMAGE 

MANAGEMENT

ANIMAL 

WELFARE

GLOBAL 

TRADE

BIOTECHNOLOGY

25+

agricultural 

sectors with 

diverse needs 

to serve

21.6M 

jobs depending

on U.S. agriculture 

and related 

industries 

$137B 

in U.S. agricultural

exports for the 

global food supply

900M

acres of U.S. 

farmland to 

protect

177M

 head of livestock 

to protect from 

predators and 

foreign animal

diseases

1M+

animals to inspect for

humane care and use 

under the Animal 

Welfare Act and the 

Horse Protection Act

Because HEALTHY and PROFITABLE American agriculture 

means FEEDING and CLOTHING the WORLD.

AT FIELD 

LOCATIONS

AT DC/MD

HEADQUARTERS

COUNTRIES STATES TERRITORIES

50 4 87% 13% 35

6 WHO

WE ARE

OUR

FOCUS

WHERE

WE SERVE

WHAT

DRIVES US

7LABS AND

RESEARCH 

HUBS

8,470

EMPLOYEES

1 MISSION

To protect the health and value 

of America’s agricultural 

and natural resources

WHY?

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Program Aid No. 2260-A • Issued March 2020
§ 15.7 Disturbances. At both Mt. Weather and NETC we prohibit any unwarranted loitering, disorderly conduct, or other conduct at Mt. Weather and NETC that: ( a ) Creates loud or unusual noise or a nuisance;
( b ) Unreasonably obstructs the usual use of classrooms, dormitory rooms, entrances, foyers, lobbies, corridors, offices, elevators, stairways, roadways or parking lots;
( c ) Otherwise impedes or disrupts the performance of official duties by government employees or government contractors;
( d ) Interferes with the delivery of educational or other programs; or
( e ) Prevents persons from obtaining in a timely manner the administrative services provided at both facilities.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the
period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr., President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1. The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of the Report, nor is it deemed to be filed for any purpose whatsoever.

Date: May 8, 2009



/s/ Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.President and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1.9 Petitions for reconsideration.

Petitions for reconsideration of a final rule will not be considered. Such petitions, if filed, will be treated as petitions for rulemaking in accordance with § 1.8.
§ 208.1 Purpose and scope of this part. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part is to prescribe policies and procedures pertaining to the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) National Urban Search and Rescue Response System.
( b ) *Scope.* This part applies to Sponsoring Agencies and other participants in the National Urban Search and Rescue Response System that have executed agreements governed by this part. Part 206 of this chapter does not apply to activities undertaken under this part, except as provided in §§ 208.5 and 208.10 of this part. This part does not apply to reimbursement under part 206, subpart H, of this chapter.
[No. 6837.

Decided January 6, 1908.]

#### North Pacific Lumber Company, Respondent, v. John D. Carroll *et al., Appellants.**1*

Sales — Actions—Evidence—Sufficiency. In an action to. recover a balance due for lumber sold and delivered, findings for the plaintiff are sufficiently supported by evidence of a conversation with one of the defendants in which he admitted that the lumber was received and the account correct.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered November 24, 1906, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on contract.

Affirmed.

*W. E. Crews*and *Wheeler*& *Skeel,*for appellants.

*W. C. Bristol*and *Hastings & Stedman,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 93 Pac. 212.

Per Curiam.

The respondent brought this action in the court below to recover a balance alleged to be due for lumber sold and delivered to the appellants. The answer admitted the contract, but denied that the lumber had been delivered as alleged. Upon a trial the court found that the lumber had been delivered by the respondent to the appellants, and used by them to the amount of $2,416.27, upon which there was paid $500, leaving a balance of $1,915.25. Judgment was entered for that amount. The defendants appeal.

The only claim made upon this appeal is that there is no evidence to sustain the finding that the lumber was delivered *164to appellants as alleged. The record shows that the president of the respondent company had a talk with one of the appellants after the lumber had been delivered and after an account had been rendered therefor, and that the said appellant admitted in this conversation that the lumber had been received and the account was correct and would be paid, and that subsequently $500 was paid. There was other evidence, but this was enough to base the finding upon, especially since there was no evidence offered by appellants and no effort made to contradict these statements.

The judgment must therefore be affirmed.
§ 309.2 Redistributions under part 307. ( a ) A Recipient of Investment Assistance under part 307 of this chapter may directly expend such Investment Assistance or, with prior EDA approval, may redistribute such Investment Assistance in the form of: ( 1 ) A subgrant to another Eligible Recipient, generally referred to a Subrecipient, that qualifies for Investment Assistance under part 307 of this chapter; or
( 2 ) Pursuant to part 307, subpart B, a loan or other appropriate assistance to non-profit and private for-profit entities.
( b ) All redistributions of Investment Assistance made pursuant to this section shall be subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to the Recipient under the original Investment Assistance award and must satisfy the requirements of PWEDA and of this chapter. EDA may require the Eligible Recipient under the original Investment Award to agree to special award conditions and the Subrecipient to provide appropriate certifications to ensure the Subrecipient's compliance with legal requirements.
[71 FR 56675, Sept. 27, 2006, as amended at 82 FR 57059, Dec. 1, 2017]