alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Approval expires: 04/2012

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGE NCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460


### FELLOWSHIP FACILITIES AND COMMITMENT STATEMENT Form Approved

OMB No. 2030-0020

INSTRUCTIONS

Applicant must complete Items 1 through 5 and then forward form to sponsor for his completion. T he sponsor should complete the

remainder of the form and forward it in the enclosed self-add ressed envelope. Applicant must affix necessary postage.

TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 1. Applicant’s Name 2. Department

3. School, College, or other Major Division 4. Institution

5. Type of Fellowship

Agency Special Full Time Part Time

TO BE COMPLETED BY SPONSOR This certifies that if a fellowship, as checked below, is awarded adequate facilities and supervision will be provided. 6. Applicant is a degree candidate

Yes No 7. Candidate would normally be expected to complete Requirements for a _______________ degree by (month and year): _________________

8. ALLOWANCES (See 40 CFR 46.110)

Annual Tuition Costs (Per credit hour, if applicable)

Fees Per Year 9. TITLE AND FULL-INSTITUTIONAL ADDRESS OF APPROPRIATE

FINANCIAL OFFICIAL TO WHOM CHECK SHOULD BE MAILED 10. DOES PROPOSED

FELLOWSHIP INVOLVE

WORK WITH HUMAN

SUBJECTS OR

EXPERIMENTAL

ANIMALS?

Yes No

11. COMMENTS OF SPONSOR a. Summarize your plans for applicant’s training including informa tion which will assist in the evaluation of applicant. This proposed training and facilities available to him. Include projection of course schedule providing course number, title, and credit hou rs to be taken. (Use continuation pages if necessary).

b. If you are the program director of an EPA Training Grant, state what relationship this fellowship (If awarded will have to t hat program. (Use continuati on page if necessary).

12. Sponsor’s Signature 13. Typed Name 14. Area Code/Tel. No 15. Date

TO BE COMPLETED BY INDIVIDUAL AUTHOR IZED TO COMMIT THE INSTITUTION 16. Signature 17. Typed Name 18. Area Code/Tel No. 19. Date

EPA Form 5770-3 (Rev 04/2012 ) PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy
of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address.
Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the annual report of MedSolutions,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-KSB  for the  year  ended  December  31,  2006,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Matthew H.
Fleeger, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



                                         /s/  MATTHEW H. FLEEGER
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Matthew H. Fleeger
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         Date:  April 16, 2007
No: I-23-003 May 1, 2023 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC Initiates Special Inspection 

at Calvert Cliffs Unit 1 Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a Special Inspection at the Calvert Cliffs 

Unit 1 nuclear power plant to review issues associated with an emergency diesel generator at the 

facility. The twin-engine generator malfunctioned during recent testing and was the subject of an 

NRC enforcement action last year.

A three-member team arrived at the Lusby, Maryland, plant on May 1 to begin the 

inspection. The team will be supplemented by the NRC resident inspectors assigned to Calvert 

Cliffs, who have been following plant owner Constellation Energy’s actions on-site since the 

mechanical failure of the generator on April 24. 

The NRC inspection team will gather key information regarding the problems involving the 

generator and will seek to better understand plant operators’ response. The team will document its 

findings in an inspection report to be issued within 45 days following the conclusion of the review. 

“Because of redundant systems, this event did not directly impact plant safety,” NRC 

Region I Administrator Raymond Lorson said. “Nevertheless, our team has been tasked with 

learning more about why this problem occurred and what steps the company is taking to ensure it 

does not happen again.” 

Operators have determined that the plant’s other emergency diesel generators are unlikely to 

have similar problems, but NRC inspectors are reviewing that assessment as part of this review. 

Emergency diesel generators are considered a key safety component at nuclear power plants. 

In the event off-site power becomes unavailable, plants use the emergency diesel generators and 

battery systems to operate safety systems until it is restored.

Last September, the NRC finalized a “white,” or of low to moderate safety significance, 

inspection finding for Calvert Cliffs based on a problem involving the same emergency diesel 

generator. In that case, operators failed to prevent the introduction of foreign material into the 

generator, resulting in its automatic shutdown and failure during routine testing.
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 September 2005 — Fernández Gómez v Commission

(Case T-272/03) (1)

(Staff cases - Temporary agent - Article 2(a) of the CEOS - Admissibility - Confirmatory act - Limitation of the duration of the contract - Possibility of renewal - Anti-overlap rule - Period worked as a national expert on secondment - Discretionary power of the Commission)

(2005/C 257/17)

Language of the case: French

Parties:

Applicant(s): Maria Dolores Fernández Gómez (Brussels, Belgium) (represented initially by J. Iturriagagoitia Bassas and K. Delvolvé and then by J. Iturriagagoitia Bassas, lawyers)

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by J. Curral, H. Tserepa-Lacombe and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and then J. Curral and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, as agents)

Application for:

(i) annulment of the decision of the Authority Responsible for Concluding Contracts of Employment of 12 May 2003 rejecting the request for renewal of the applicant's temporary agent contract and (ii) an order that the Commission pay the sum of EUR 101 328,60, together with default interest, as compensation for the damage suffered

Operative part of the judgment:

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 251, 18.10.2003.

----
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 437

**Question 437:** The rule provides for disregarding certain radionuclides in a mixture of radionuclides in air if three conditions are met. The conditions are:
> 
a. The licensee uses the total activity of the mixture in demonstrating compliance with occupational dose limits and monitoring requirements;

b. The concentration of any radionuclide disregarded is less than 10% of its derived air concentration (DAC); and

c. The sum of the percentages for all radionuclides disregarded in the mixture does not exceed 30%. As used in this provision, what is the intent of the phrase "total activity of the mixture" and how is it to be applied? Please provide an example that illustrates how this provision may be properly used.

**Answer:** See the answer to Question 121 under the heading 10 CFR 20.1204. That answer states that the term "total activity" in 10 CFR 20.1204 refers to "gross activity" measurements that are correlated with other measurements of individual radionuclides; an example of the use of this provision is provided in that answer.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1204)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-cv-22746-AMC

CARLOS FERNANDEZ et al.

Plaintiff,

vs.

CHECK ALT ERAS INC.

and SHAI STERN

Defendants

_______________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

The parties hereby advises this Court that settlement has been reached at

mediation in this matter.

Behren Law Firm

1930 N. Commerce Parkway-Suite 4

Weston, FL 33326

(954) 636-3802 - phone

(772) 252-3365 - fax

scott@behrenlaw.com

By:/Scott M. Behren/

Scott M. Behren 

Fla Bar No. 987786

Case 1:20-cv-22746-AMC Document 75 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2021 Page 1 of 1
#### Leonora McLaughlin, Suing on Behalf of Herself and of All Other Cred*921itors of the McLaughlin Real Estate Company, etc., Respondent, v. The McLaughlin Real Estate Company and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Others.

(Appeal No. 1.)

— Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Burr, J., dissented.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-181 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Tuesday, December 10, 1996)

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET JANUARY 28-30 IN ROCKVILLE, MD

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on

Nuclear Waste (ACNW) has scheduled a technical meeting January

28-30 in Rockville, Md.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will begin at 8:30

a.m. each day in Room T-2B3 in the NRC's Two White Flint North

Building, 11545 Rockville Pike.

Although meetings of the ACNW are open, they are not part of

the NRC's public hearing process. The ACNW was established in

1988 to advise the Commission on all aspects of nuclear waste

management. While anyone may attend the meeting, the committee

will consider only oral or written statements, arranged in

advance and limited to specific matters set forth in a Notice of

Meeting published in the December 10 edition of the Federal

Register.

Among the topics to be discussed during the meeting are the

status of NRC staff key technical issue efforts relating to highlevel waste, progress on the Yucca Mountain Project, and the

committee's defense-in-depth philosophy. The committee will also

prepare for its February 1997 meeting with the Commission, and

will discuss proposed reports, topics for future consideration

and miscellaneous matters.

(ACNW schedules are subject to change. Anyone planning to

attend should confirm the schedule the day before the meeting by

calling (301) 415-5024.

#

(NOTE TO EDITORS: The use of self-contained tape recorders

in the meeting room is permitted during open portions of the

meeting when a transcript is being kept. The use of still,

motion picture and television cameras - the physical installation

and presence of which will not interfere with the course of the
meeting - will be permitted both before and after the meeting,

during any recess, and, at the discretion of the committee

chairman, while the meeting is in session.)
#### William M. SMITH, Plaintiff, Enervest Operating LLC; Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, Steadfast Insurance Co., Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GAUBERT OIL CO. INC., Third Party Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-30800.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 13, 2006.

Susan A. Daigle, Wendell R. Verret, Charles Edward Schaub, Daigle, Scofield & Rivera, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellani/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant.

Nelson W. Wagar, III, Jason Paul Foote, Chopin Wagar Richard & Kutcher, Metairie, LA, for Third Party DefendantAppellee.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

After study of the briefs and argument of the parties, we are convinced that the district court did not err in rejecting the application of maritime law and applying Louisiana law in the interpretation of the relevant contract. We reach this conclusion because it is clear, and indeed undisputed, that the Master Service Contract is not a maritime contract. Even when the instant purchase order is considered with that contract, we are fully convinced that the delivery of the oil by barge was incidental to the sale of the oil. *See Lucky-Goldstar, Int’l (America) Inc. v. Phibro Energy Int’l, Ltd.,*958 F.2d 58, 59-60 (5th Cir.1992). To the extent that maritime services were performed under the contract, those services were neither predominant nor separable from the non-maritime obligation. *Id.*Consequently, maritime law does not apply to the contract. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
0-cr-06218-NCR Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2000 Pa
0-cr-06218-NCR Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2000 Pa
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2
                                       TO
                         NON-NEGOTIABLE PROMISSORY NOTE

         This Amendment No. 2 to the Non-Negotiable Promissory Note (this
"Amendment") is executed as of September 9, 2002, by The MacReport.Net, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, (the "Maker") and Sherman Winski (the "Payee") to amend
the Non-Negotiable Promissory Note dated January 14, 2002 among those parties
(the "Note").

         The Maker and the Payee desire to amend the Note and further agree as
follows:

1. Capitalized Terms. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, all
capitalized terms used in this Amendment have meanings ascribed to them in the
Note and those definitions are incorporated by reference into this Note.

2. The first sentence of the Note shall be deleted and the following sentence
shall be substituted therefor:

"For value received, the undersigned, The MacReport.Net, ("MacReport"), a
Delaware corporation, (the "Maker") hereby promises to pay to the order of
Sherman Winski (the "Payee") the principal sum of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars
($200,000) which shall be on January 13, 2003 days from the date hereof (the
"Final Maturity Date"), together with accrued interest thereon at the rate set
forth in Section 2 below.

3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original as against the party whose signature
appears thereon, and all of which shall together constitute one and the same
instrument. This Amendment shall become binding when one or more counterparts
hereof, individually or taken together, shall bear the signatures of all the
parties reflected hereon as the signatories.

4. Third Parties. Except as specifically set forth or referred to herein,
nothing herein express of implied is intended or shall be construed to confer
upon or give to any person other than the parties hereto and their permitted
successors or assigns, any claims, rights, remedies under or by reason of this
Amendment.

5. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of New York applicable to agreements made and to be
performed entirely within such State and the federal laws of the United States
of America, without regard to the conflict of laws rules thereof.


               [THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK]

<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of
the date set forth above.

                                     THE MACREPORT.NET, INC.


                                     By:              /s/
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Name:  V. William Lucchetti, Jr.
                                        Title: President



                                                      /s/
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                     Sherman Winski
No: 23-053 August 29, 2023 

CONTACT: Ivonne Couret, 301-415-8200 

NRC to Hold Hybrid Meeting on Nuclear Industry Codes and Standards

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold the 2023 Standards Forum on Sept. 13 as a 

hybrid meeting. This is the 7th annual forum to facilitate discussion on the nuclear industry’s 

needs and priorities relating to codes and standards. 

There will be opportunities to discuss areas where the NRC and standards development 

organizations can collaborate to accelerate the development of codes and standards and 

streamline the agency’s review and endorsement of these codes and standards in its regulations 

and regulatory guides.

The forum, hosted by the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, includes topics 

on codes and standards for advanced reactor technologies, international initiatives, risk-informed 

and performance-based standards, and development of standards for artificial intelligence 

systems. 

The conference will run from 10:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Eastern time at NRC headquarters in 

the Two White Flint North Auditorium, 11555 Rockville Pike, North Bethesda, Maryland, and 

virtually for those who cannot attend in person. 

Stakeholders who plan to participate should register online before Sept. 4. The meeting contact is 

Robert Roche-Rivera at robert.roche-rivera@nrc.gov.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Special Medical Advisory Group will meet on November 12, 2004. The meeting will be held in Room 830, at VA Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, from 9 a.m. until 3 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Group is to advise the Secretary and Under Secretary for Health on the care and treatment of disabled veterans, and other matters pertinent to the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The agenda for the meeting will include discussions on electronic health records, research, recruitment and compensation of health care professionals, special programs, care coordination and VA's Care Model.

Any member of the public wishing to attend should contact Juanita Leslie, Office of Administrative Operations (10B2), Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs at (202) 273-5882. No time will be set aside at this meeting for receiving oral presentations from the public. Statements, in written form, may be submitted to Juanita Leslie before the meeting or within 10 days after the meeting.

Dated: October 12, 2004.

By Direction of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-23227  Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-cv-81081-MIDDLEBROOKS

NELSON FERNANDEZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

FIREBIRDS INTERNATIONAL, LLC,

Defendant.

________________________________________/

ORDER CLOSING CASE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With

Prejudice filed by Plaintiff Nelson Fernandez on August 12, 2020. (DE 8). Plaintiff seeks to 

dismiss this case with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a 

plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss an action by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party 

serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

Defendant has served neither. Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1) This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

2) The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE THIS CASE and DENY all pending motions AS 

MOOT. 

SIGNED in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida, this 13th day of August, 2020. 

________________________________

DONALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 9:20-cv-81081-DMM Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.909 Standard of review.

The standard of review for deciding a Size Standard Petition is whether the process employed by the Administrator to revise, modify, or establish the size standard was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with the law. OHA will not adjudicate arguments that a different size standard should have been selected. The Petitioner bears the burden of proof.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ARAMARK Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. Frederick Sutherland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    L. FREDERICK SUTHERLANDL. Frederick Sutherland