UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:20-cv-22918-KMM

CHARLTON EDWARD LACHASE,

Plaintiff,

v.

FORMER WARDEN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the case. On July 14, 

2020, pro se Plaintiff Charlton Edward LaChase (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. (“Compl.”) (ECF No. 1). The Court referred the matter to the Honorable Lisette 

M. Reid, United States Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation 

recommending that the case be DISMISSED. (“R&R”) (ECF No. 29). Plaintiff did not file 

objections, and the time to do so has passed. The matter is now ripe for review. As set forth 

below, the Court ADOPTS the R&R.1

The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 

recommendations made by the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). 

At the time the Compliant was filed, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis 

(“IFP”) which was granted. See (ECF Nos. 10, 13). However, upon release from incarceration, 

the Order granting Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP was vacated, and Plaintiff was ordered to 

either pay the full filing fee or complete and file a non-prisoner application to proceed without 

1

 The Court adopts the R&R with the following alteration: on page two, line twenty-two, the 

citation should read, in relevant part, “429 F. Supp. 3d 1315, 1324–25 (S.D. Fla. 2019).” 

Case 1:20-cv-22918-KMM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/25/2021 Page 1 of 2
2 

payment of fees with appropriate documentation on or before November 30, 2020. (ECF No. 28). 

Plaintiff was cautioned that “failure to either pay the Clerk’s filing fee or timely complete and file 

the required IFP application may result in a report recommending dismissal of this case.” Id. at 4. 

Plaintiff was also ordered to file an Amended Complaint on or before November 30, 2020. (ECF 

No. 27). Plaintiff was cautioned that “failure to file the amended complaint on time will probably 

result in dismissal of this case.” Id. at 7. 

As set forth in the R&R, Magistrate Judge Reid recommends that Plaintiff’s Complaint be 

dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the Court’s 

Orders. R&R at 2. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Reid finds that (1) Plaintiff has not filed an 

amended complaint; (2) Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or filed a non-prisoner application to 

proceed without payment of fees; and (3) Plaintiff has not taken any other action in this case. Id. 

Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Reid recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice. 

Id. at 3. This Court agrees. 

UPON CONSIDERATION of the Complaint, the R&R, the pertinent portions of the 

record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND 

ADJUDGED that Magistrate Judge Reid’s R&R (ECF No. 29) is ADOPTED and Plaintiff’s 

Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to CLOSE this case. 

All pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this ____ day of January, 2021. 

K. MICHAEL MOORE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

c: All counsel of record 

23rd

Case 1:20-cv-22918-KMM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/25/2021 Page 2 of 2