alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5062 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase access to mental 

health programs for physicians. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 

Mr. DAINES (for himself and Ms. STABENOW) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase 

access to mental health programs for physicians. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Our Physicians 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMS FOR PHY7 SICIANS. 

8 Section 1877(e) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 1395nn(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following 

10 new paragraph: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5062 IS

1 ‘‘(9) MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM FOR PHYSI2 CIANS.—The provision by an entity of an evidence3 based or evidence-informed program for physicians 

4 for the primary purpose of preventing suicide and 

5 improving mental health and resiliency and for 

6 training such physicians in appropriate strategies to 

7 promote their mental health, if such program— 

8 ‘‘(A) is in a policy set out in writing and 

9 approved in advance of the operation of the 

10 program by the governing body of the entity; 

11 ‘‘(B) is offered to all physicians on the 

12 bona fide medical staff of the entity or in the 

13 local community or service area of the entity; 

14 ‘‘(C) is offered to all such physicians on 

15 the same terms and conditions regardless of the 

16 volume or value of referrals or other business 

17 generated by the physician for the entity; and 

18 ‘‘(D) meets any other requirements as the 

19 Secretary may impose by regulation as needed 

20 to protect against program or patient abuse.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Ernest Bedini, Appellant, v. Gligor Christo, Respondent.

Order modified by permitting the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within twenty days after service of a copy of the order with notice of entry thereof, upon payment of $10 costs, and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We conclude that, broadly construed, the complaint discloses a cause of action for specific performance of a written agreement of August 21, 1946, to which the Statute of Frauds does not apply. The plaintiff has unnecessarily pleaded a contract partly oral and partly written when, in truth, he has, what appears to be, a complete written contract for the purchase and sale of the property. We determine, therefore, that although this complaint may have been properly dismissed, plaintiff should be permitted to serve an amended pleading, upon the payment of $10 costs. All concur. (The order grants defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in an action to declare the amount of the purchase price to be paid for certain property and to compel specific performance of a contract of purchase on the basis of said amount.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, MeCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ. [189 Misc. 377.]
§ 147.650 Grant. *Grant* means an award of financial assistance that, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6304, is used to enter into a relationship— ( a ) The principal purpose of which is to transfer a thing of value to the recipient to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by a law of the United States, rather than to acquire property or services for the Federal Government's direct benefit or use; and
( b ) In which substantial involvement is not expected between the Federal agency and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the award.
Exhibit 32.2

                  Certification of the Chief Accounting Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In  connection  with the  annual  report  of  MedSolutions,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2004,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  J.
Steven Evans, the Chief  Accounting  Officer of the Company,  hereby  certifies,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,
         in all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of
         operations of the Company.



                              /s/  J. STEVEN EVANS
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             J. Steven Evans
                             Vice President/Finance and Chief Accounting Officer
                             Date:  April 15, 2005
§ 315.4 TAAC selection and operation. ( a ) EDA solicits applications from organizations interested in operating a TAAC through Notice of Funding Opportunity announcements laying out selection and award criteria. The following entities are eligible to apply: ( 1 ) Universities or affiliated organizations;
( 2 ) States or local governments; or
( 3 ) Non-profit organizations.
( b ) Entities selected to operate the TAACs are awarded cooperative agreements and work closely with EDA and import-impacted firms. TAAC cooperative agreements are subject to all Federal laws and to Federal, Department, and EDA policies, regulations, and procedures applicable to Federal financial assistance awards, including 2 CFR part 200.
Unied States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-176 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, August 13, 1999)

NRC PROPOSES ELIMINATING NON-COMBUSTIBILITY REQUIREMENT

FOR FIRE BARRIER PENETRATION SEALS AT NUCLEAR PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing to amend its regulations to eliminate

a requirement that nuclear power plant fire barrier penetration seal material be noncombustible, because the requirement is not believed to contribute significantly to safety. Other

minor changes also have been proposed.

As part of the NRC’s defense-in-depth philosophy for protecting nuclear power plants

through the use of multiple safety barriers, the plants are divided into separate fire areas by firerated structural barriers designed to contain a fire and prevent its spread to other areas.

Special fire barriers consisting of silicone foam are used to seal openings between fire barriers.

The seals provide reasonable assurance that a fire will be confined to the area in which it starts

and are designed to stop a fire long enough for it to be extinguished and for safety systems to

activate.

Testing has shown that if fire barrier penetration seals are properly designed, tested,

configured, installed, inspected and maintained, they are capable of preventing the spread of

fire for several hours thus performing their intended safety function. Therefore, the NRC’s

technical staff and Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards - an independent body of

technical experts that provides guidance to the Commission - agreed that the requirement in

Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Appendix R, be amended to eliminate the

non-combustibility requirement for the seals.

Details of the proposed rule changes will be published in an upcoming edition of the

Federal Register. The proposed rule will be posted to the NRC’s homepage at:

http://ruleforum.llnl.gov Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the

proposed rule within 75 days of its publication in the Federal Register. Comments should be

sent to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001,

Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. Comments may also be submitted

electronically via the NRC’s interactive rulemaking web site at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov.

##
###### Editorial Note on Part 115

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 115 appear at 72 FR 50038, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 115.66 Fees.

The PSB Surety must pay SBA a certain percentage of the Premium it charges on Final Bonds. The PSB Surety must also remit to SBA the Principal's payment for its guarantee fee, equal to a certain percentage of the Contract amount. The fee percentages are determined by SBA and are published in Notices in the Federal Register from time to time. Each fee is rounded to the nearest dollar. The Surety must remit SBA's Premium share and the Principal's guarantee fee with the bordereau listing the related Final Bond, as required in the PSB Agreement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from  VisionGlobal  Corporation and Subsidiaries June 30, 1999
                  financial  statements  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
                  reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                              0000894535
<NAME>                                             VisionGlobal Corpoation
<CURRENCY>                                         U.S.

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1999


<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.00

<CASH>                                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    0
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               223,506
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            17,302
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (240,808)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        0
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    0
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    702,727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (702,727)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (702,727)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (702,727)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (.04)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     EPS reflects retroactive effect of a 1-for-4 reverse stock split
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000895041
<NAME>                        ma#2fazv
<MULTIPLIER>                       1

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                             533,257
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      500,427
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        462,432
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   2,390,945
<PP&E>                             13,381,807
<DEPRECIATION>                     5,081,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     11,589,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              4,776,309
<BONDS>                            2,317,579
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        2
<COMMON>                           160
<OTHER-SE>                         4,238,823
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       11,589,019
<SALES>                            19,619,154
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   19,855,465
<CGS>                              5,430,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      5,430,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   13,813,993
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 207,114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    404,261
<INCOME-TAX>                       4,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                372,072
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       347,072
<EPS-BASIC>                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .09




</TABLE>
#### § 4.1169 Failure to state a claim.

Upon proper motion or after the issuance of an order to show cause by the administrative law judge, an administrative law judge may dismiss at any time an application for review which fails to state a claim upon which administrative relief may be granted.
### §608. Seal

The Director shall use a seal approved by the Supreme Court. Judicial notice shall be taken of such seal.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 915.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §444 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §302, as added Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 501, §1, 53 Stat. 1223).

This section contains a part of section 444 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. The remainder of said section 444 is incorporated in sections 601, 603 and 606 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Vietnam War
### §1497. Oyster growers' damages from dredging operations

The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim for damages to oyster growers on private or leased lands or bottoms arising from dredging operations or use of other machinery and equipment in making river and harbor improvements authorized by Act of Congress.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 941; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §133(c), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §250a (Aug. 30, 1935, ch. 831, §13, 49 Stat. 1049; July 13, 1943, ch. 231, 57 Stat. 553).

The proviso at the end of section 250a of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., is incorporated in section 2501 of this title.

Words "river and harbor improvements" were substituted for "such improvements", in view of Dixon v. U.S., 103 Ct. Cl. 160, holding that words, "such improvements" were not limited to the specific improvements listed in the 1935 act, but applied to any river and harbor improvements.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "growers' " for "growers," in section catchline, and "United States Claims Court" for "Court of Claims" in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.
### §2108. Proof of amount in controversy

Where the power of any court of appeals to review a case depends upon the amount or value in controversy, such amount or value, if not otherwise satisfactorily disclosed upon the record, may be shown and ascertained by the oath of a party to the case or by other competent evidence.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 963.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §231 (Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, §9, 43 Stat. 941).

Words "or in the Supreme Court" were omitted. Section 7 of the 1925 act containing such words related to review by the Supreme Court of the United States of decisions of the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands and designated a certain jurisdictional amount. Such section 7 has now become obsolete, in view of the recognition of the independence of the Philippines, title 48 U.S.C., 1940 ed., §1240, Territories and Insular Possessions, and there is no other case wherein the power of the Supreme Court to review depends on the amount or value in controversy.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 16 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00845

- CR

FREDRICK LOYCE BOOTY , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1309652

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a guilty plea to attempted sexual assault . In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to deferred adjudication probation for five years. The State subsequently filed a motion to adjudicate guilt in which it alleged appellant failed to abide by certain conditions of probation. Appellant entered a plea of true to the State’s motion in exchange for a recommendation that his punishment should be set at2 confinement for seven years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department
of Criminal Justice. The trial court adjudicated appellant’s guilt and sentenced him in accordance with the plea bargain agreement. Appellant fi led a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s r ight to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The re cord supports
th e trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and McCally

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 9:20-cv-80993-WPD

TIMOTHY O’BRYAN

Plaintiff,

vs. 

JOE TAYLOR RESTORATION, INC., a Florida

Corporation, AARON GETTY, individually, 

KAREN RADEWICZ, individually, and

GLENDA GALARZA, individually, 

Defendants.

 /

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 11

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendants’, Joe Taylor Restoration, Inc., Aaron 

Getty, Karen Radewicz, and Glenda Galarza, motion for sanctions pursuant to Rule 11, and the 

Court having reviewed the motion and the file in this cause, and being otherwise fully advised in 

the premises, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants’ motion for sanctions pursuant to Rule 

11 is GRANTED. ______________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this ______ day of _____________, 

2020. 

___________________________________

WILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: Counsel of Record

Case 9:20-cv-80993-WPD Document 15-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22997]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 522b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Initial Review Group, Neurological Sciences and Disorders 
B.
    Date: October 14-15, 2004.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Grant Hyatt San Francisco, 345 Stockton Street, San 
Francisco, CA 94108.
    Contact Person: W. Earnest Lyons, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, 
Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-4056.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Initial Review Group, Neurological Sciences and Disorders 
K.
    Date: October 19-20, 2004.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Westin St. Francis, 335 Powell Street, San Francisco, CA 
94102.
    Contact Person: Katherine M. Woodbury, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, 
Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 5, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22997 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M