alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-CV-22326-MOORE/LOUIS

JULIO RAMIREZ, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendant. 

__________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Counsel’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for 

Plaintiff (ECF No. 29). This Motion was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate 

Judge by the Honorable Chief Judge, K. Michael Moore (ECF No. 30). Upon consideration of the 

briefing and the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, the Motion is DENIED.

Florida Bar Rule 4-1.16 allows an attorney to withdraw from representing a client in certain 

circumstances, including where “withdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect 

on the interests of the client . . . or other good cause for withdrawal exists.” R. Regulating Fla. Bar 

4-1.16(b). However, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Local 

Rule 11.1(D)(3) makes clear that “[n]o attorney shall withdraw the attorney’s appearance in any 

action or proceeding except by leave of court after notice served on the attorney’s client and 

opposing counsel.” Moreover, Rule 4-1.16(c) of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar provides 

that “[w]hen ordered to do so by a tribunal, a lawyer shall continue representation notwithstanding 

good cause for terminating the representation.” See Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Anodyne, 

Case 1:20-cv-22326-KMM Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/29/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Inc., 365 F. Supp.2d 1232, 1238 (S.D. Fla. 2005) (concluding that trial court had the authority to 

deny motion to withdraw and require attorney's continued representation under Rule 4-1.16(c)). 

Here, Plaintiff’s counsel has failed to show that good cause exists for withdrawing as 

counsel; the Motion merely states “irreconcilable differences have arisen.” Nor has Plaintiff’s 

counsel shown that his client would not be prejudiced by his withdrawal. The Motion was filed 

within ten days of the deadline to complete discovery, and mediation is set for the following week. 

The Motion is thus DENIED. 

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 29th day of December, 2020. 

HON. LAUREN LOUIS 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-22326-KMM Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/29/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### § 428.1 Purpose of this part.

This part addresses Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (RRA) forms requirements for certain farm operators and the eligibility of formerly excess land that is operated by a farm operator who was the landowner of that land when it was excess.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.827 Other services a CDC may provide to small businesses.

A CDC may provide a small business with assistance unrelated to the 504 loan program as long as the CDC does not make such assistance a condition of the CDC accepting from that small business an application for a 504 loan. An example of other services a CDC may provide is assisting a small business in applying for a 7(a) loan (as described in § 120.2). A CDC is subject to part 103 of this chapter when providing such assistance.

[68 FR 57981, Oct. 7, 2003]
Opinion issued February 21, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas

NO. 01-13-00027-CR ____________

SONYA AMADOR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 184th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1269270

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Sonya Amador pleaded guilty to the felony offense of murder. 

The trial court found appellant guilty, and in accordance with the terms of 

appellant’s plea agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to confinement for 

life in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 

Appellant has filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.
2

In a plea-bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial 

court’s permission to appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be 

dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has 

not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. 

The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea-bargain case and that the 

appellant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record 

supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss 

this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A 

court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who 

plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited 

appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss all

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Sharp, and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
### **CHAPTER 51—UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS**

Sec.
791.
Clerk.
[792, 793.
Repealed.]
794.
Law clerks and secretaries.
795.
Bailiffs and messengers.
796.
Reporting of court proceedings.
797.
Recall of retired judges.
798.
Places of holding court; appointment of special masters.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1992**—Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516, substituted "UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS" for "UNITED STATES CLAIMS COURT" as chapter heading.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §416(b), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3364, added item 798.

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §121(b), (c)(2), (d)(2), (f)(2), (g)(2), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 34–36, substituted "UNITED STATES CLAIMS COURT" for "COURT OF CLAIMS" as chapter heading and, in analysis of sections in the chapter, struck out item 792 "Commissioners" substituted "Law clerks and secretaries" for "Stenographers and clerical employees" in item 794, substituted "Bailiffs and messengers" for "Bailiff and messenger" in item 795, and substituted "judges" for "commissioners" in item 797.

**1972**—Pub. L. 92–375, §1, Aug. 10, 1972, 86 Stat. 529, added item 797.

**1970**—Pub. L. 91–272, §15(b), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 298, added item 796.

**1954**—Act Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1263, §40, 68 Stat. 1240, struck out item 793 "Reporter-commissioners; stenographers".
#### Lottie Partner, et al., v. Howard S. Palmer et al., as trustees of the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, et al.,

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1051.]
#### Long Island Lighting Company, Respondent, v. Village of Old Brookville et al., Appellants.

Defendants appeal from a judgment declaring that the zoning ordinance of defendant village is ineffective to prevent plaintiff from erecting an electric transmission line, and dismissing defendants’ counterclaim, which sought to restrain, as a public nuisance, the erection of a transmission line above ground. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ. [See *post,*p. 910.]
City of Thibodaux

Concept of Operation

UAS will be utilized for assistants with video productions for public awareness and educational videos 

posted on the city of Thibodaux’s website. We will also use UAS in a assisting with video productions for 

training purposes.

Videos will include operations of city services, city projects and other informative information for the 

citizens of Thibodaux. UAS will be used when there is a need to show a higher elevation point of view 

used in such video productions.

UAS will be flown within the city limits of Thibodaux and no higher than 200 feet.

Guy Fanguy

985 448-5859

IT Director

1233 Canal Bvld.

City of Thibodaux, Louisiana
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5291 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5291

  To delay the implementation of the modifications of exceptions for 
             reporting of third party network transactions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 15, 2022

  Mrs. Capito introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To delay the implementation of the modifications of exceptions for 
             reporting of third party network transactions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DELAY IN MODIFICATION OF EXCEPTIONS FOR REPORTING OF THIRD 
              PARTY NETWORK TRANSACTIONS.

    Section 9674(c)(1) of the American Rescue Plan of 2021 is amended 
by striking ``December 31, 2021'' and inserting ``December 31, 2022''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of TransAlta Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brett Gellner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 
| 1.     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange   Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all   materials respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the   Company.       |

 

 

 
| /s/   Brett Gellner            |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Brett   Gellner                |   |
| Chief   Financial Officer      |   |
|                           |   |
| Dated:   August 25, 2011. |   |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diametrics Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, W. Glen Winchell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

 

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
§ 150.4 Nomination and selection criteria. ( a ) Nominations for the President's Award or the Distinguished Public Safety Service Award shall be made on the basis of, and in conformity with, the following uniform criteria. ( 1 ) *President's Award.* Documentation accompanying the nomination for this Award must indicate not only that the nominee unquestionably meets the standards established for the Distinguished Public Safety Service Award (see paragraph (a)(2) of this section), but also deserves greater public recognition because he/she has demonstrated unique qualities of courage, imagination or ability, which have resulted in outstanding contributions to the public safety.
( 2 ) *Distinguished Public Safety Service Award.* Nomination for this award shall clearly show that the public safety officer's qualifying service or act is marked by courage, imagination or ability or has resulted in a significant contribution to the public safety accomplished through an originality of effort which far exceeds the expected quality of performance of the normal duties assigned to the nominee.
( b ) A nomination shall specify whether it is being submitted for the President's Award or the Distinguished Public Safety Award.
[49 FR 39845, Oct. 11, 1984, as amended at 74 FR 15344, Apr. 3, 2009]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial infomration extracted from
     Micro-Economics, Inc. March 31, 2000 financial statements and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894552
<NAME>                        MICRO-ECONOMICS, INC.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000

<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                              (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .00



</TABLE>
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-240

November 8, 1999

NRC CONFIRMS THAT ALL NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

ARE FULLY Y2K-READY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received notification by all 103 operating

nuclear power plants that they have completed remediation efforts to be fully “Y2K-ready”–that

is, all plant systems involved with safety, power generation, and plant support are now prepared

to roll over into the Year 2000 without computer problems.

Safety-related systems at all 103 plants have been Y2K-ready since July 1. At that time,

sixty-eight of the plants were declared fully Y2K-ready while 35 had remaining work on nonsafety systems (those systems involved with power generation and plant support). During the

past four months, NRC has confirmed satisfactory completion of the remaining work that has

resulted in all plants now being fully Y2K- ready.

Based on our review of responses from the nuclear power industry concerning Y2K

readiness, our independent inspection efforts at all 103 plants, and our ongoing regulatory

oversight activities, we conclude that the Y2K problem will not adversely affect the continued

safe operation of U.S. nuclear power plants, and should contribute to grid stability during the

transition period.

Detailed information on NRC’s Y2K activities are available on the web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRC/NEWS/year2000.html.

The “Year 2000" or “Y2K” problem refers to a computer’s potential inability to recognize

dates beginning with January 1, 2000, and beyond. It arises from computer programs that use

two-digit numbers to represent a calendar year (such as “98" for 1998). For example, a

computer system could read “00" as 1900, rather than 2000, potentially causing a computer

system to malfunction. “Y2K-ready” means that the function provided by a computer will be

carried out successfully with the coming of the Year 2000.

#
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# Previously Announced Date and Time:

Tuesday, January 27, 2004. Meeting closed to the public. This meeting was cancelled.

# Date and Time:

Thursday, February 5, 2004, 2 p.m.

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

# Status:

This meeting will be open to the public.

The following item has been added to the agenda:

Final Rules on Extension of the Administrative Fines Program.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert W. Biersack, Acting Press Officer Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04-2311  Filed 1-30-04; 2:43 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Order entered November 14, 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 01144

- CV

GREAT HANS

, LLC, Appellant

V.

LIBERTY BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE CO., Appellee

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 14

- 12254



### O RDER

On the Court’s own motion, we REMOVE this appeal from submission on November

27, 2018. The appeal will be resubmitted in the first quarter of 2019.

/s / DAVID L. BRIDGES

PRESIDING JUSTICE
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-241

November 9, 1999

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste

(ACNW) will meet on November 17-19 in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss the proposed Yucca

Mountain high-level waste repository, among other topics.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in conference room T-2B3

of the agency’s Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike.

On Wednesday, November 17, the agenda will include opening remarks by the

ACNW Chairman, the committee staff briefing the ACNW on issues to be considered at this

and future meetings, and a review of generic codes used to predict radionuclide transport in the

geosphere.

The following day’s agenda will include NRC staff discussion of its review of the

Department of Energy’s Yucca Mountain Draft Environmental Impact Statement, and proposed

rule 10 CFR Part 63, “Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in a Proposed Geologic

Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada,” including public comments. Other topics to be

discussed are rubblization, which is the demolition and burying of building foundation parts of

former nuclear facilities, the Yucca Mountain review plan, and the staff drafting of planned

reports on a White Paper regarding the site’s near-field chemistry. Finally, the day’s agenda

includes discussion of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards’ risk-informed,

performance-based approach, the Yucca Mountain high-level waste regulation and the draft

environmental impact statement by the Department of Energy.

On Friday, November 19, topics include a discussion with members of the NRC’s Office

of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards to coordinate program priorities and other items of

interest, and the preparation of ACNW reports.

Although ACNW meetings are open, they are not part of the agency’s normal hearing

process. The ACNW is an advisory group established by the NRC in 1988 to provide the

agency with independent technical review and advice on the disposal of nuclear waste.

While anyone may attend, the committee will consider only oral or written statements

arranged in advance and limited to specific matters described in a Notice of Meeting published

in an upcoming edition of the Federal Register. A detailed ACNW meeting agenda, transcripts

and letter reports are available on the internet, at http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW
Those seeking additional information on opportunities to present oral statements or on

final schedule changes, should contact Richard Major, at 301- 415- 7366.

###
### HPV2 PMDA CASRN 89-32-7 Time Extension Request fro ACC Consortium Paul Campanella to: Gulledge, Bill 09/27/2012 02:32 PM

Cc: John Schaeffer



## Dear Mr. Gulledge, Based on our extensive discussion with you regarding the testing of this compound that include, inter alia , problems encountered in bid acquisition and evaluation time for a large amount of data, laboratory availability and scheduling and report preparation and review time, the EPA is willing to extend the due date for submittal of the final reports to the requested time of December 28, 2013. Please notify us of any changes to the schedule that would enable you to submit the data at an earlier

time for our review.

.

HPV 2 CASRN 89-32-7 EPA Agreement to ACC Extenson request for data submittal.pd f 89-32-7 Agreement Extenson request submittal.pd



## Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D. Chemical Information and Testing Branch

Chemical Control Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C.

202-564-8091