alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**







**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF
      2002**





I,
      Lee
      Kasper, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of NuTech
      Digital, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2006
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of NuTech Digital, Inc.





**NUTECH
      DIGITAL, INC.**





DATED:
      April 6,
      2007 By:
      /s/ Lee Kasper


Lee
      Kasper


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Accounting Officer)
### **CHAPTER 44—ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION**

Sec.
651.
Authorization of alternative dispute resolution.
652.
Jurisdiction.
653.
Neutrals.
654.
Arbitration.
655.
Arbitrators.
656.
Subpoenas.
657.
Arbitration award and judgment.
658.
Compensation of arbitrators and neutrals.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1998**—Pub. L. 105–315, §12(b)(1), (2), Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2998, substituted "ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION" for "ARBITRATION" in chapter heading and amended analysis generally, substituting items 651 to 658 for former items 651 "Authorization of arbitration", 652 "Jurisdiction", 653 "Powers of arbitrator; arbitration hearing", 654 "Arbitration award and judgment", 655 "Trial de novo", 656 "Certification of arbitrators", 657 "Compensation of arbitrators", and 658 "District courts that may authorize arbitration".
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5196 

To authorize the location of a monument on the National Mall to commemorate and honor the women’s suffrage movement and the passage of 

the 19th Amendment to the Constitution, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2022 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, and Mr. BENNET) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the location of a monument on the National 

Mall to commemorate and honor the women’s suffrage 

movement and the passage of the 19th Amendment to 

the Constitution, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women’s Suffrage Na5 tional Monument Location Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5196 IS

1 SEC. 2. WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE NATIONAL MONUMENT. 

2 (a) SITE.—Notwithstanding section 8908(c) of title 

3 40, United States Code, the Women’s Suffrage National 

4 Monument shall be located within the Reserve. 

5 (b) APPLICABILITY OF COMMEMORATIVE WORKS

6 ACT.—Except as provided in subsection (a), chapter 89 

7 of title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the 

8 ‘‘Commemorative Works Act’’), shall apply to the Wom9 en’s Suffrage National Monument. 

10 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

11 (1) WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE NATIONAL MONU12 MENT.—The term ‘‘Women’s Suffrage National 

13 Monument’’ means the commemorative work author14 ized to be established under Public Law 116–217 

15 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note). 

16 (2) RESERVE.—The term ‘‘Reserve’’ has the 

17 meaning given such term in section 8902(a)(3) of 

18 title 40, United States Code. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
§ 3216.17 Where must I file estate transfers, corporate mergers, and name changes? ( a ) If you have posted a bond for any Federal lease, you must file estate transfers, corporate mergers, and name changes in the BLM State Office that maintains your bond.
( b ) If you have not posted a bond, you must file estate transfers, corporate mergers, and name changes in the State Office having jurisdiction over the lease.
#### Raenore Novelties, Inc., Respondent, v. Alfred W. Case et al., Doing Business as Plak-Kloz Company, Appellants. Raenore Novelties, Inc., Respondent, v. Superb Stitching Co., Inc., Appellant. Raenore Novelties, Inc., Respondent, v. Ideal Fastener Corporation, Appellant. Raenore Novelties, Inc., Respondent, v. Bert Mechur et al., Doing Business as Invisible Fastener Company, Appellants. Raenore Novelties, Inc., Respondent, v. Seal-Plac, Inc., Appellant. Raenore Novelties, Inc., Respondent, v. Rena Bernstein et al., Doing Business as “Plaquette-Ease*”*Products, Appellants. Raenore Novelties, Inc., Respondent, v. Rite Style Trimming, Inc., Appellant. Raenore Novelties, Inc., Respondent, v. Stuartab, *962Inc., Appellant. Raenore Novelties, Inc., Respondent, v. Lo-Bell Novelty Incorporated, Appellant. Raenore Novelties, Inc., Respondent, v. Ace Placket Company, Inc., Appellant. Raenore Novelties, Inc., Respondent, v. Samuel H. Geffner et al., Doing Business as Vogue Placket Company, Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
<page>

						  EXHIBIT 31.01

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being
prepared;














<page>
b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)		All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and

b)		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.





Date:  May 17, 2004           /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman
	                            Jeffrey A. Rothman
                                 President,
                                 Demeter Management Corporation,
                                 general partner of the registrant
### [§§2601 to 2604. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §140, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 44]

Section 2601, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 979; June 2, 1970, Pub. L. 91–271, title I, §103, 84 Stat. 275; Oct. 10, 1980, Pub. L. 96–417, title IV, §403(a)–(d), title V, §501(27), (28), 94 Stat. 1740–1742, provided for appeals to the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals from final judgments or orders of the Court of International Trade and for the procedures to be followed in such appeals. See section 1295(a)(5) of this title.

Section 2602, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 980; Oct. 14, 1966, Pub. L. 89–651, §8(c)(3), 80 Stat. 902; June 2, 1970, Pub. L. 91–271, title I, §104, 84 Stat. 276; Oct. 10, 1980, Pub. L. 96–417, title IV, §403(e)(1), 94 Stat. 1741, provided for the precedence of enumerated civil actions in the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. See section 1296 of this title.

Section 2603, added Pub. L. 96–417, title IV, §404(a), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1741, provided that, except as provided in section 2639 or 2641(b) of this title or in the rules prescribed by the court, the Federal Rules of Evidence would apply in the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in any appeal from the Court of International Trade.

Section 2604, added Pub. L. 96–417, title IV, §405(a), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1741, authorized the chief judge of the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals to summon annually the judges of the court to a judicial conference for the purpose of considering the business of the court and improvements in the administration of justice of the court.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as an Effective Date of 1982 Amendment note under section 171 of this title.
20-3050-AORCase 1:20-mj-03050-AOR   Document 11   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2020   Page 1 of 3

Case 1:20-mj-03050-AOR   Document 11   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2020   Page 2 of 3

Case 1:20-mj-03050-AOR   Document 11   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2020   Page 3 of 3
### §2003. Marshal's incapacity after levy on or sale of realty

Whenever a United States marshal dies, is removed from office, or the term of his commission expires, after levying on realty or any interest therein under a writ of execution issued by a court of the United States, and before sale or other final disposition thereof, like process shall issue to the succeeding marshal and the same proceedings shall be had as if such contingency had not occurred.

Whenever any such contingency arises after a marshal has sold any realty or interest therein and before a deed is executed, the court may, on application by the purchaser, or the plaintiff in whose action the sale was made, setting forth the facts of the case and the reason why the title was not perfected by such marshal, order the succeeding marshal to perfect the title and execute a deed to the purchaser, upon payment of the purchase money and unpaid costs.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 959; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §101, 63 Stat. 104.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### 1948 Act

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §850 (R.S. §994).

Word "realty" was substituted for "lands, tenements, or hereditaments" in two places, the two terms being synonymous. (See Black's Law Dictionary, 3d Ed., p. 1969.)

Word "action" was substituted for "suit", in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, prescribing but one form of action.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### 1949 Act

This section corrects a typographical error in section 2003 of title 28, U.S.C.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1949—Act May 24, 1949, corrected spelling of "realty" in first par.
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.611 What should I include in my application for an award?

(a) Your application must be in the form of a written petition which is served and filed in accordance with § 134.204. It must contain the following information:

(1) A statement that OHA has jurisdiction over the case pursuant to § 134.102(g);

(2) Identification of the administrative proceeding for which you are seeking an award;

(3) A statement that you have prevailed, and a list of each issue in which you claim the position of SBA was not substantially justified;

(4) Your status as an individual, owner of an unincorporated business, partnership, corporation, association, organization, or unit of local government;

(5) Your net worth and number of employees as of the date the administrative proceeding was initiated, or a statement that one or both of these eligibility requirements do not apply to you;

(6) The amount of fees and expenses you are seeking, along with the invoice or billing statement from each service provider;

(7) A description of any affiliates (as that term is defined in § 134.608), or a statement that no affiliates exist;

(8) A statement that the application and any attached statements and exhibits are true and complete to the best of your knowledge and that you understand a false statement on these documents is a felony punishable by fine and imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. 1001; and

(9)

(i) Your name and address;

(ii) Your signature, or the signature of either a responsible official or your attorney; and

(iii) The address and telephone number of the person who signs the application.

(b) You should follow this chart to determine which further documents must be included with your application:

| Party | Required documents |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Individual, owner of unincorporated business, partnership, corporation, association, organization, or unit of local government | (1) Net worth exhibit. |
| (2) Organization qualified as tax-exempt under 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) | (2) Copy of a ruling by the Internal Revenue Service that you qualify as a 501(c)(3) organization or |
| | Statement that you were listed in the current edition of IRS Bulletin 78 as of the date the administrative proceeding was initiated. |
| (3) Tax-exempt religious organization not required to obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service on its exempt status | (3) Description of your organization and the basis for your belief you are exempt. |
| (4) Cooperative association as defined in 12 U.S.C. 1141j(a) | (4) Copy of your charter or articles of incorporation, and |
| | Copy of your bylaws. |

[61 FR 2683, Jan. 29, 1996. Redesignated at 63 FR 35766, June 30, 1998, and 70 FR 8927, Feb. 24, 2005, as amended at 75 FR 47443, Aug. 6, 2010]
#### FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, to the Use of SECRETARY OF BANKING, Receiver of Integrity Trust Company, to the Use of Butcher *&*Sherrerd, and Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company, Trustee, v. Harry J. ALKER, Jr., and Mamie DuBan, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Alfred A. DuBan, Deceased. BUTCHER & SHERRERD and Fidelity. Philadelphia Trust Company, Trustee, Petitioners, v. Honorable George A. WELSH and the Other Judges of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Harry J. Alker, Jr., and Mamie DuBan, Individually and Executrix of the Estate of Alfred A. DuBan, Deceased.

Nos. 8805, 10948.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued June 6, 1955.

Decided June 14, 1955.

*263Harry J. Alker, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., pro se, A. D. Bruce, Francis E. Walter, for defendant-petitioner.

Richard C. Bull, Thomas Raeburn White, Howard H. Rapp, Thomas B. K. Ringe, Philadelphia, Pa., for Butcher & Sherrerd and Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co., Trustee.

Before MARIS, GOODRICH, Mc-LAUGHLIN, KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court in this case was affirmed by this court on November 7, 1945, 151 F.2d 907. Since that time defendant Alker has made repeated efforts in the district court, in this court and in the Supreme Court to obtain relief from that judgment by way of a new trial. This court is now again presented by Alker with a motion for an order granting leave to the district court to reconsider his motion for a new trial. We are constrained at this time to grant the leave requested even though we have denied similar applications in the past. We do so because we have now reached the conclusion that Alker should have an opportunity to convince the district court, if he can, that he is entitled under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., to relief from the judgment entered against him by that court. In reaching this conclusion we make it clear that we intimate no opinion upon the merits of Alker’s motion for a new trial or even whether the district court is empowered to grant it under Rule 60 (b). We merely desire to open the way for the district court to decide those questions, which it will do in the exercise of its own responsibility and discretion. We will, of course, also vacate the writs of prohibition and mandamus heretofore directed to the district court at our No. 10,948, 206 F.2d 259.

It will be so ordered.
Exhibit 32

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Angelo Tullo, the CEO of YP.Net, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report of YP.Net, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of YP.Net, Inc.

Date: December 30, 2003        /s/ Angelo Tullo
                              -----------------------
                               Angelo Tullo
                               Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


     I, David Iannini, the CEO of YP.Net, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report of YP.Net, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of YP.Net, Inc.

Date: December 30, 2003       /s/ David Iannini
                              -----------------------
                              David Iannini
                              Chief Financial Officer



<PAGE>
#### § 302.1 Environment.

EDA will undertake environmental reviews of Projects in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (Pub. L. 91-190; 42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.,* as implemented under 40 CFR chapter V) (“*NEPA*”), and all applicable Federal environmental statutes, regulations, and Executive Orders. These authorities include the implementing regulations of NEPA requiring EDA to provide public notice of the availability of Project-specific environmental documents, such as environmental impact statements, environmental assessments, findings of no significant impact, and records of decision, to the affected or interested public, as specified in 40 CFR 1506.6(b). Depending on the Project's location, environmental information concerning specific Projects may be obtained from the individual serving as the Environmental Officer in the appropriate EDA regional office listed in the applicable FFO.

[79 FR 76128, Dec. 19, 2014]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.

# Time and Date:

8 a.m. to 4 p.m., November 9, 2004.

# Place: 

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Board of Regents Conference Room (D3001) 4301 Jones Bride Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-4799.

# Status:

Open—under “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)).

# Matters To Be Considered:

 

8 a.m. Meeting—Board of Regents

(1) Approval of Minutes—August 3, 2004

                    (2) Faculty Matters                          ( print page 60843)    

(3) Departmental Reports

(4) Financial Report

(5) Report—Interim President, USUHS

(6) Report—Dean, School of Medicine

(7) Report—Dean, Graduate School of Nursing

(8) Approval of Degrees—School of Medicine, Graduate School of Nursing

(9) Comments—Chairman, Board of Regents

(10) New Business

# Contact Person for More Information:

 Dr. Barry Wolcott, Executive Secretary, Board of Regents, (301) 295-3681.

Dated: October 7, 2004.

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 04-23111  Filed 10-8-04; 3:30 pm]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M