alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE, Respondent, v. GRAVDAHL, Appellant.

(190 N. W. 555.)

(File No. 5010.

Opinion filed November 18, 1922.)

Intoxicating Liquors — Information—Omission of Purchaser’s Name Does Not Make Information Insufficient to State Offense.

The fact that an information for selling liquor did not name the persons sold to, but merely alleged the sale to “other persons,” does not render it demurrable.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Roberts County; Hon. Eranic Anderson, Judge.

Oscar Gravdahl was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor's,, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

*61
      *Howard Babcock,*of Sisseton, for Appellant.

*Byron S. Payne,*Attorney General, and *E. D. Roberts,*Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

PORREY, J.

Defendant was convicted on an information which charges that on a certain specified date he sold and furnished intoxicating liquors to “other persons,” without naming any person in particular. Defendant demurred to. the information on the ground that it does not set out the name of the person or persons to whom the intoxicating liquor was sold. This demurrer was overruled, and such ruling is assigned as error.

It is the contention of appellant that the information does not inform him oí the particular offense against which he must defend; that under this information he might be tried for more than one offense or on any one of several offenses. The questions presented by appellant on this appeal are precisely the same as the questions presented in the case of State v. Blair, 186 N. W. 961, recently decided by this court. And upon the authority of that case the judgment and order appealed from in this case are affirmed.

ANDERSON, J., not sitting.

Note — Reported in 190 N. W. 555. See American Key-Numbered Digest, Intoxicating Liquors, Key-No. 219, 23 Cyc. 232, 233, 15 R. C. L. 387.

Authorities discussing the question as to whether indictment or information for unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors must state name of person to whom, sale is made, are collected in note in 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 581.
Part II Section A Item 1d
§ 123.508 How can you use Military Reservist EIDL funds? Your small business can use Military Reservist EIDL to: ( a ) Meet obligations as they mature,
( b ) Pay ordinary and necessary operating expenses, or
( c ) Enable the business to market, produce or provide products or services ordinarily marketed, produced, or provided by the business, which cannot be done as a result of the essential employee's military call-up.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5132 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5132

 To correct the boundary of the Chaco Culture National Historical Park 
          in the State of New Mexico, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2022

 Mr. Heinrich introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To correct the boundary of the Chaco Culture National Historical Park 
          in the State of New Mexico, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pueblo Pintado Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. CHACO CULTURE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK BOUNDARY CORRECTION.

    (a) In General.--The boundary of the Chaco Culture National 
Historical Park in the State of New Mexico is revised to reflect the 
boundary identified as ``Adjusted Boundary'' on the map entitled 
``Chaco Culture National Historical Park Proposed Boundary 
Correction'', numbered 310/126,526B, and dated November 19, 2018 
(referred to in this section as the ``map'').
    (b) Transfers of Administrative Jurisdiction.--Subject to the 
consent of the Navajo Nation--
            (1) administrative jurisdiction over the surface estate of 
        the land removed from the Chaco Culture National Historical 
        Park under subsection (a), as depicted on the map, is 
        transferred from the National Park Service to the Bureau of 
        Indian Affairs, to be held in trust by the United States for 
        the benefit of the Navajo Nation; and
            (2) administrative jurisdiction over the surface estate of 
        the land added to the Chaco Culture National Historical Park 
        under subsection (a), as depicted on the map, is transferred 
        from the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Bureau of Land 
        Management to the National Park Service.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

Case Number: 20-22394-CIV-MORENO

EMILIO PINERO, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

STASIO, INC. and KONIG RESTAURANTS 

INTERNATIONAL, L.C., agent of PIZZA 

HUT,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER

DENYING ALL PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Joint Stipulation of Dismissal (D.E. 15), filed 

on October 1, 2020. 

THE COURT has considered the notice and the pertinent portions of the record, and is 

otherwise fully advised in the premises. It is

ADJUDGED that this Cause is DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party bearing its 

own fees and costs. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The Court reserves jurisdiction for six months 

to enforce the terms of the settlement. Further, all pending motions are DENIED as MOOT with 

leave to renew if appropriate. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 2nd of October 2020.

______________________________________

FEDERICO A. MORENO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-22394-FAM Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/02/2020 Page 1 of 1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMode-medium instability and its correction with a Gaussian reflectivity mirrorA high power CO2 laser beam is known to deteriorate after a few microseconds due to a mode-medium instability (MMI) which results from an intensity dependent heating rate related to the vibrational-to-translational decay of the upper and lower CO2 lasing levels. An iterative numerical technique is developed to model the time evolution of the beam as it is affected by the MMI. The technique is used to study the MMI in an unstable CO2 resonator with a hard-edge output mirror for different parameters like the Fresnel number and the gas density. The results show that the mode of the hard edge unstable resonator deteriorates because of the diffraction ripples in the mode. A Gaussian-reflectivity mirror was used to correct the MMI. This mirror produces a smoother intensity profile which significantly reduces the effects of the MMI. Quantitative results on peak density variation and beam quality are presented.Document ID19900016357Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsWebster, K. L.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL., United States)*Sung, C. C.*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategoryOpticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:3023NASA-TP-3023Accession Number90N25673Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016357.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 1997 (Unaudited) and the Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the nine months ended March 31, 1997 (Unaudited) and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               3,229,735
<SECURITIES>                                         5,013,880
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2,487,143
<ALLOWANCES>                                            61,500
<INVENTORY>                                            169,538
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    12,004,396
<PP&E>                                               2,086,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                         785,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      23,768,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,782,968
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                95,262
<OTHER-SE>                                          18,340,282
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        23,768,515
<SALES>                                             27,125,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    28,132,676
<CGS>                                               17,202,073
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       17,202,073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     7,511,081
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       3,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      4,137,185
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,590,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  2,547,185
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,547,185
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.26
                                                


</TABLE>
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-43 May 6, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT POINT BEACH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois, have

announced the assignment of Patrick Louden as the agency's

Resident Inspector at the Point Beach Nuclear Power Station,

located near Two Rivers, Wisconsin.

Louden joined the NRC in 1990 as a radiation specialist in the

agency's Region II Office in Atlanta, Georgia. He later worked

as a senior radiation specialist in the NRC's Region III Office

in Lisle, Illinois. Prior to joining the NRC, he worked for the

Naval Technical Intelligence Center as a technical intelligence

analyst. He received a Bachelor of Science in Physics from

Indiana State University. Louden and his wife and daughter live

in Two Rivers, Wisconsin.

Louden joins NRC Senior Resident Tony McMurtray and Resident

Inspector Chuck Keller at Point Beach. They can be reached at

414/755-2307.

#
#### §§ 16.141-16.148 [Reserved]
1

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

No. 123,130

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

STATE OF KANSAS,

Appellee,

v.

LARRY D. STEVENSON SR.,

Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appeal from Sedgwick District Court; ERIC WILLIAMS, judge. Opinion filed June 11, 2021.

Appeal dismissed.

Submitted by the parties for summary disposition under K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 21-6820(g) and (h).

Before MALONE, P.J., POWELL and WARNER,JJ.

PER CURIAM: Larry D. Stevenson Sr. appeals his sentence following his 

conviction of one count of violating the Kansas Offender Registration Act (KORA). We 

granted Stevenson's motion for summary disposition under Kansas Supreme Court Rule 

7.041A (2021 Kan. S. Ct. R. 48). The State has responded and asks us to dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

On June 3, 2020, Stevenson pled guilty to one count of violating KORA by failing 

to report for registration as required. Under the plea agreement, both parties 

recommended that the district court grant Stevenson's motion for a durational departure 

and impose a 34-month prison sentence. At the sentencing hearing on July 15, 2020, the 
2

district court approved the plea agreement and granted Stevenson's motion for a departure 

sentence of 34-months' imprisonment with 24-months' postrelease supervision.

Even though Stevenson received the exact sentence that he asked the district court 

to impose, his public defender filed a notice of appeal and the district court dutifully 

appointed the appellate defender's office to handle the appeal. In the motion for summary 

disposition, Stevenson argues that "the district court erred in sentencing him." But he 

concedes that this court lacks jurisdiction to review a plea-negotiated sentence that the 

district court approved on the record. The State's response points out the same thing.

Both parties are correct. Under K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 21-6820(c)(2), appellate courts 

shall not review any sentence resulting from an agreement between the State and the 

defendant which the sentencing court approves on the record. And even though K.S.A. 

2020 Supp. 21-6820(a) provides that a departure sentence is subject to appeal by either 

party, K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 21-6820(c)(2) is a more specific provision than K.S.A. 2020 

Supp. 21-6820(a). See State v. Cooper, 54 Kan. App. 2d 25, 28, 394 P.3d 1194 (2017). 

Thus, we lack jurisdiction to review Stevenson's plea-negotiated sentence even though

the sentence results from a departure.

Appeal dismissed.
#### § 11.13 Investigations.

FEMA may investigate, or may request any other Federal agency to investigate, a claim filed under this part.
REV20220513

1 of 2

TODAY’S DATE: _____________

NRC FACILITIES COVID-19 SCREENING

Accessible version available at https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/covid-19/index.html

PLEASE READ EACH

QUESTION CAREFULLY

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ANSWER THAT APPLIES

TO YOU AND FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS 

BASED ON YOUR RESPONSE

1. Have you experienced any of the symptoms

in the list below in the past 48 hours?

• fever or chills

• New or unexplained onset of cough,

shortness of breath, or difficulty

breathing

• New or unexplained loss of taste or

smell

• New or unexplained muscle aches

If you are experiencing symptoms you should not 

access an NRC or licensee facility until you are 

able to get tested. 

YES

Proceed to 

Question 2 

Access to NRC

Facilities

NOT APPROVED

NO

2. Are you isolating or quarantining because

you tested positive for COVID-19 and it has

not been more than 5 full days since your

positive test, and if you had symptoms you

are not fever-free for 24 hours (without the

use of fever-reducing medication) and your

symptoms are not improving?

YES

Access to NRC

Facilities

NOT APPROVED

NO

Proceed to

Question 3

STOP 

STOP

Individuals with symptoms that can be common with other 

medical conditions and not specifically COVID-19 should 

follow care instructions from their healthcare provider. 

Individuals may enter the building if you reasonably believe 

the symptoms are unrelated to COVID-19. 

If you tested positive do not access a NRC or license facility for 5 full days and, if you had symptoms, 

you must be fever-free for 24 hours (without the use of fever-reducing medication) and your 

symptoms are improving. Wear a well-fitted mask for 10 full days.

If you had symptoms and were tested, is your test result 

negative, you have gone 24 hours with no fever without the 

use of fever reducing medication, or you reasonably believe 

the symptoms are unrelated to COVID-19?
REV202120513

2 of 2

3. Were you exposed to someone who

 has tested positive for COVID-19? ?

YES NO

Access to 

NRC Facilities 

Approved

Please contact COVID19.Resource@nrc.gov for questions related to this form.

You should get tested, even if you don't develop 

symptoms, at least 5 days after you were exposed to 

someone who has tested positive for COVID-19. 

Watch for symptoms until 10 days after you were last 

exposed to someone with COVID-19.

If you develop symptoms, refrain from accessing a 

NRC or licensee facility and follow the precautions in 

the next row.

Access to 

NRC Facilities 

Approved
### SUBCHAPTER I—PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RIGHTS
### §1106. Prohibited transactions

#### (a) Transactions between plan and party in interest

Except as provided in section 1108 of this title:

(1) A fiduciary with respect to a plan shall not cause the plan to engage in a transaction, if he knows or should know that such transaction constitutes a direct or indirect—

(A) sale or exchange, or leasing, of any property between the plan and a party in interest;

(B) lending of money or other extension of credit between the plan and a party in interest;

(C) furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between the plan and a party in interest;

(D) transfer to, or use by or for the benefit of a party in interest, of any assets of the plan; or

(E) acquisition, on behalf of the plan, of any employer security or employer real property in violation of section 1107(a) of this title.

(2) No fiduciary who has authority or discretion to control or manage the assets of a plan shall permit the plan to hold any employer security or employer real property if he knows or should know that holding such security or real property violates section 1107(a) of this title.

#### (b) Transactions between plan and fiduciary

A fiduciary with respect to a plan shall not—

(1) deal with the assets of the plan in his own interest or for his own account,

(2) in his individual or in any other capacity act in any transaction involving the plan on behalf of a party (or represent a party) whose interests are adverse to the interests of the plan or the interests of its participants or beneficiaries, or

(3) receive any consideration for his own personal account from any party dealing with such plan in connection with a transaction involving the assets of the plan.

#### (c) Transfer of real or personal property to plan by party in interest

A transfer of real or personal property by a party in interest to a plan shall be treated as a sale or exchange if the property is subject to a mortgage or similar lien which the plan assumes or if it is subject to a mortgage or similar lien which a party-in-interest placed on the property within the 10-year period ending on the date of the transfer.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §406, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 879.)
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MALIK HAMID ZAMAN,

Appellant,

v.

MARGIT MA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2169

[October 7, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Howard K. Coates, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502019CA003465.

Malik Hamid Zaman, Palm Beach Gardens, pro se.

No brief filed on behalf of appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 10.28


 


 


 


October 29, 2018


 


Dear Jiawei (Jerry) Wang,


 


Thank you for voluntarily offering to adjust your
annual salary during this difficult time for the Company. This letter is to inform you that effective as of October 16, 2018, your new
base salary will be $61,734.40.00 and such adjustment will be reflected in the payroll on October 31, 2018.


 


Sincerely,


 


Hong Liu


Global CAO/EVP and GC


 


	 	 






I have read and accepted the terms and conditions stated in this letter.


 


Signature:


 


Name: Jiawei (Jerry) Wang


Title: VP, Global Capital Markets


Date:
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

101 Marietta Street, N. W.

Suite 2900

Atlanta, GA 30323

No: 96-63 FOR

IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Tuesday,

July 23, 1996)

Telephone: (404) 331-5503\7878

NRC CHAIRMAN TO VISIT DUKE POWER NUCLEAR PLANTS

Press Conference Scheduled On Thursday, July 25

At 4:30 p.m. at Catawba Nuclear Power Plant

The Chairman of the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Dr.

Shirley Ann Jackson, will visit Duke Power company's Catawba and

McGuire nuclear power plants this week and will be available to

meet with news media representatives on Thursday, July 25 at

Catawba at 4:30 p.m. in Room 153 of the plant administration

building.

Her schedule calls for visits to Catawba on July 25 and to

McGuire on July 26. She will tour the facilities with the NRC

resident inspectors and Duke managers and hold discussions with

company representatives related to operations at the two plants.

She will be available to meet with news media representatives

following her tour of Catawba, located near Rock Hill, South

Carolina, about 20 miles south of Charlotte.

Dr. Jackson, a theoretical physicist, became an NRC

commissioner on May 2, 1995 and was named Chairman two months later

on July 1. She earned a Bachelor of Science Degree in physics in

1968 and a Ph.D. in the field of theoretical elementary particle

physics in 1973, both from the Massachusetts Institute of

Technology. She conducted research in theoretical physics, solid

state and quantum physics, and optical physics for a number of

years at AT&T Bell Laboratories and was a Professor of Physics at

Rutgers University when appointed to the NRC.

She is the first African-American woman to receive a doctorate

from MIT, the first African-American to become an NRC Commissioner

and the first woman and the first African-American to serve as NRC

Chairman.

####
#### § 9212.0-2 Objective.

The objective of this subpart is to prevent wildfires on the public lands.
Exhibit 32.3





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ener1, Inc., a Florida corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Robert R. Kamischke, Chief Accounting Officer and Vice President of Finance of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Robert R. KamischkeRobert R. KamischkeChief Accounting Officer and Vice President of Finance(Duly Authorized Principal Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)





May 10, 2011





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]