alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, W. Glen Winchell, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Diametrics
Medical, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: June 13, 2005 /s/ W. Glen WinchellSignatureName: W. Glen Winchell
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
|   | (1) | such Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in such Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Magna-Lab, Inc. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|             |   |                                                           |   |
|------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| January 12, 2011 |   | /s/ Kenneth C. Riscica                                         |   |
|             |   | Name: Kenneth C. Riscica                                       |   |
|             |   | Title: Treasurer & Secretary (principal financial officer) |   |
```

[110th Congress Public Law 210]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ210.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 723]]

Public Law 110-210
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
20 Sussex Street in Port Jervis, New York, as the ``E. Arthur Gray Post 
         Office <<NOTE: May 7, 2008 -  [H.R. 3196]>> Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. E. ARTHUR GRAY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 20 Sussex Street in Port Jervis, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``E. Arthur Gray Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``E. Arthur 
Gray Post Office Building''.

    Approved May 7, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3196:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Mar. 10, considered and passed House.
            Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 0:20-cv-61241-RUIZ

APRIL HICKS,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

THIS MATTER came before the Court on January 24, 25, and 26, 2022, for a bench trial. 

After careful review and consideration of all of the facts and evidence presented during the trial, 

it is hereby,

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court adopts the findings of fact and conclusions 

of law pertaining to liability announced on the record on January 26, 2022, at the conclusion of 

the bench trial, and rules in favor of the Defendant, United States of America. The Court defers 

entering a final judgment until the Parties notify the Court whether a trial on damages relating to 

Defendant’s Counterclaim is necessary.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida on January 31, 2022.

_________________________________

PAUL C. HUCK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies provided to: Counsel of Record

Case 0:20-cv-61241-RAR Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2022 Page 1 of 1
----

Infringement procedure 2003/4497 — Civitavecchia

(2005/C 314/05)

Further to the supplementary reasoned opinion which the Commission sent Italy in pursuance of the abovementioned procedure, in which the Commission found that, by not measuring correctly ambient concentrations of PM10 particles in the area of Civitavecchia and consequently failing to inform the public of these concentrations regularly, Italy had failed to fulfil its obligations under Directives 96/62/EC on ambient air quality assessment and management (1) and 1999/30/EC relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air (2), the Italian authorities have informed the Commission that, since 3 April 2005, an air-quality monitoring station has been operating in Civitavecchia (via Palmiro Togliatti) capable of measuring PM10 concentrations and the relevant information is available on the Agenzia Regionale Protezione Ambientale del Lazio (Lazio Region Environmental Protection Agency — Arpalazio) website http://www.arpalazio.it/aria/centraline/dettaglio_provincia.php.

Therefore, in light of the foregoing, the Commission's departments take the view that the Italian Republic has complied with the abovementioned supplementary reasoned opinion and that infringement proceedings 2003/4497 should be closed. They will therefore propose that the Commission should close the procedure.

Any new information submitted to the Commission which might lead it to reconsider its decision to close the case must be communicated within a month of the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union. In the absence of any such new information, the Commission will close the procedure.

This does not preclude that, should the Commission come into possession, even after the procedure is closed, of new facts justifying the opening of a new procedure regarding the same subject-matter, the case would be reopened and proceedings initiated once again.

----

(1)OJ L 296, 21.11.1996, p. 55-63.

(2)OJ L 163, 29.6.1999, p. 41-60.

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Daniel Hunter, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and a director of FinMetal Mining Ltd., and Kenneth Phillippe, the Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of FinMetal Mining Ltd., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of FinMetal Mining Ltd., for the year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of FinMetal Mining Ltd.

Date:     April 16 2007.



| | /s/ "Daniel Hunter"_____________________________________Daniel HunterChairman, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and a director
Date:  April 16, 2007.         
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ "Kenneth Phillippe"_____________________________________Kenneth PhillippeSecretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  April 16, 2007.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to FinMetal Mining Ltd. and will be retained by FinMetal Mining Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
#### § 9264.3 Grazing administration—Alaska; reindeer. [Reserved]
#### § 151.23 Penalties.

Claimant's officials or others who provide information or documentation under this part are subject to, among other laws, the criminal penalties of Title 18 of the United States Code, sections 287 and 1001, which punish the submission of false, fictitious or fraudulent claims and the making of false, fictitious or fraudulent statements and which provide for a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both. For such a violation, the person is likewise subject to the civil penalties set out in 31 U.S.C. 3729 and 3730.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Datums, ellipsoids, grids, and grid reference systems [electronic resource].**** 
SuDoc:D 5.308:98020782
ItemNumber: 0379-A-13 (online)
CGPsystem Number:000487239
 
Part A
Part B
Part C
Part D
 **
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0 3 30 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. BRADLEY MEFFORD ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 29 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 24 2021

08/24/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0330
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-6 January 27, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT MAINE YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia (PA) have

announced the assignment of Richard Rasmussen as the agency's Resident

Inspector at the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station in Wiscassett, Maine. He

succeeds Bill Olsen, who has been reassigned to the Seabrook plant in New

Hampshire.

Mr. Rasmussen began his career as a test engineer/chief test engineer at

the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard in Hawaii. Prior to joining the NRC in 1993,

he worked as a system test engineer at Northrop Corporation in Palmdale,

California. At the NRC, Mr. Rasmussen has worked as a reactor engineer, and

as a resident inspector at Indian Point Unit 3 in Buchanan, NY. Mr. Rasmussen

received a Bachelors of Science degree in mechanical engineering from

California State University at Fresno.

Mr. Rasmussen joins the Senior Resident Inspector, Jimi Yerokun, at

Maine Yankee. They can be reached at 207/882-7519.

#
Exhibit 10.2


 


SHIFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 


2020 OMNIBUS EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN


 


AMENDMENT TO RSU AGREEMENT


 


THIS
AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is made to that certain RSU Agreement dated February 2, 2021, between Shift Technologies,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and George Arison (“Grantee”) (the “RSU
Agreement). This Amendment is effective April 5, 2021 (the “Amendment Effective Date”). All capitalized terms used
herein that are not otherwise defined have the same meaning given to them in the Plan or the RSU Agreement, as applicable.


 


As of the Amendment Effective
Date, the parties to the RSU Agreement, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, agree to the
following changes to the RSU Agreement. This Amendment rescinds and cancels 1,044,272 RSUs as set forth below.


 


		1.	Section 1 is amended to replace “3,044,272” with “2,000,000.”



 


		2.	Section 2 is amended to replace “2,283,204” with “1,238,932.”



 


		3.	283,204 unvested Time RSUs granted pursuant to Section 2(a)(i)(a)
are rescinded and cancelled, such that the 1,238,932 aggregate Time RSUs granted pursuant to such Section 2(a)(i)(a) (as amended) shall
vest or have vested, as applicable, in accordance with the following schedule:



 


	
    190,267
	 	Jan. 12, 2021
	190,267	 	Apr. 12, 2021
	190,267	 	Jul. 12, 2021
	190,267	 	Oct. 12, 2021
	190,267	 	Jan. 12, 2022
	190,267	 	Apr. 12, 2022
	97,330	 	Jul. 31, 2022


 


		4.	The entire 761,068 Time RSU grant pursuant to Section 2(a)(i)(b)
is rescinded and cancelled.



 


		5.	The remainder of the RSU Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



 


[SIGNATURE LINES ON NEXT PAGE]


 




     


     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officer to execute this Amendment, and the Grantee has placed his
or her signature hereon, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.


 


SHIFT TECHNOLOGIES,
INC. 


 





	By:	/s/ Tobias Russell	 
	 	Signature	 
	 	 	 
	Name:	Tobias Russell	 
	 	 
	Title:  	Co-Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 
	Date:  	April 5, 2021	 


 


I hereby agree to the
terms of this Amendment. I further agree that all of the decisions and interpretations of the Company with respect thereto shall be final
and binding.


 


	GRANTEE:	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ George Arison	 
	 	Signature	
	 	 	 
	Name:	 George Arison	 
	 	Print Name
Juneau

Salmon Season days/year Season 91

Average Salmon Season Waste pounds/day AveSalSeasonWaste 106,400

Tote volume gal/tote Gtote 275

Tote capacity pounds/tote Ptote 2117.5

Tote cost $/tote Dtote 111

Bag capacity pounds/bag Pbag 2000

Bag cost Dbag 15.24

Salmon oil density pounds/gal Odensity 7.7

Salmon meal density pounds/cf Mdensity 37.02

Salmon oil yield pounds/pounds Oyield 0.02

Salmon meal yield pounds/pounds Myield 0.2

Totes for oil totes/1000 pound raw waste Toilpackaging 0.01

Oil packaging costs $/oil tote per 1000 pound raw waste Doilpackaging 1.05

Bags for meal bags/1000 pound raw waste Bmealpackaging 0.10

$/bag per 1000 lb raw waste Dmealpackaging 1.52

total packaging cost $/1000 lb raw waste Dpackaging 2.57

Item Unit Name Value
Petersburg

169,128

density from aqua calc.com

density from aqua calc.com

The supersacks go for $15.24 and the spacekraft totes got for $125 each retail (but he qu

The sizing chart is by cubic ft. Each supersack can hold 85 cubic ft. I think the ton per sac
t for $125 each retail (but he quoted us $111).

 cubic ft. I think the ton per sack was what we had estimated for costing purposes.
### **CHAPTER 173—ATTACHMENT IN POSTAL SUITS**

Sec.
2710.
Right of attachment.
2711.
Application for warrant.
2712.
Issue of warrant.
2713.
Trial of ownership of property.
2714.
Investment of proceeds of attached property.
2715.
Publication.
2716.
Personal notice.
2717.
Discharge.
2718.
Interest on balances due department.
#### Blackman *et al. v.*Garrett *et al.,*trustees, *et al.*

Fish, C. J.

Where a bill of exceptions complains of the refusal of an interlocutory injunction, and it appears therefrom that certain documentary and vital evidence was introduced upon the hearing, and such *227evidence is neither incorporated in the bill nor referred to therein and attached thereto as an exhibit properly authenticated, and no brief of the evidence has been approved and filed so as to become a part of the record, but such documentary evidence is merely specified by the excepting party as a part of the record to be sent up to this court by the clerk of the trial court, the judgment will be affirmed, as without such evidence this court can not determine the question whether-the judge erred in refusing the injunction; and the same, not being a part of the record in the case, can not be specified and sent up to this court as such. *Askew*v. *Hogansville Cotton Oil Co.,*126 *Ga.*807 (55 S. E. 921) ; *Edmondson*v. *Edmondson,*128 *Ga.*53 (57 S. E. 308) ; *Roberts*v. *City of Cairo,*133 *Ga.*642 (66 S. E. 938), and cases cited.

October 11, 1910.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Edwards. Haralson superior court. December 11, 1909.

*M. J.*Head, for plaintiffs.

*Griffith & Matthews,*for defendants.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Keith Salazar, Assessment Manager

Preliminary Materials for 

the IRIS Assessment of 

Ethyl tert-butyl ether 

(ETBE)

Office of Research and Development

National Center for Environmental Assessment, Integrated Risk Information System December 12, 2013
1

General Information

• ETBE is a colorless liquid with a strong odor similar to gasoline, 

varnish or ether. 

• Possible application of ETBE as an oxygenate for gasoline. 

Exposure

• May occur through interaction with gasoline containing ETBE.

• General population could be exposed to vapors while refueling 

automobiles or by drinking contaminated groundwater.

Assessment History

• 2009- External peer review identifies additional JPEC studies.
2
3

Preliminary Materials for the IRIS Assessment of ETBE:

• Draft literature search strategy

• Draft literature search results

• Preliminary evidence tables

• Preliminary exposure-response arrays 

*These materials are available online at: 

http://www.epa.gov/iris/publicmeeting/iris_bimonthly-dec2013/mtg_docs.htm
4

Literature Search Strategy

•The literature search identified 

more than 700 studies for ETBE.

• 90 references are being 

considered for the assessment 

after an initial screen for 

relevance.

Data Extraction to Evidence 

Tables

• 33 references directly informing 

hazard identification are 

described in evidence tables.

33 studies in 

evidence tables
5

Features of the ETBE Database

Chronic Subchronic

Two-Gen 

Repro/Dev

MOA

Information PBPK

Oral    

Inhalation    

• Human data on exposures to ETBE consist of a human TK study
6

Endpoints with Data for 

Evaluating Hazard

• Kidney Effects

• Liver Effects

• Reproductive and Developmental 

Effects

• Cancer

• Other Systemic Effects

• Genotoxic Effects

Scientific Considerations

• PBPK modeling

– Metabolized to tert-butanol & 

acetaldehyde

• Kidney MOA

– Alpha2u-globulin-associatednephropathy 

– Chronic progressive nephropathy 

(CPN)

• Liver MOA

– PPAR

– PXR/CAR

– ALDH2
7

EPA welcomes all comments, such as:

• Clarity and transparency of materials

• Additional approach for identifying studies

• Selection of studies for data extraction

• Study quality considerations

• Additional studies that may inform the assessment
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-22160-Civ-COOKE/DAMIAN

PAUL JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MIDNIGHT EXPRESS POWER 

BOATS, INC.,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS MATTER is before me on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the

Honorable Melissa Damian, U.S. Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 102), regarding Defendant 

Midnight Express Power Boats Inc.’s application for bill of costs (ECF No. 97) and 

supporting memorandum (ECF No. 100). In her R&R, Judge Damian recommends that I 

grant in part and deny in part the application (ECF No. 102 at 6). The parties have not filed 

objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has passed. I have reviewed the application for 

bill of costs, Judge Damian’s R&R, the record, and the relevant legal authorities. Having 

done so, I find Judge Damian’s R&R to be clear, cogent, and compelling. 

Accordingly, Judge Damian’s R&R is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as the Order of 

this Court. It is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the application for bill of costs

is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as set forth in the R&R. Defendant is 

therefore awarded $1,473.00 in taxable costs.

DONE and ORDERED in chambers, at Miami, Florida, this 21st day of June 2022.

Case 1:20-cv-22160-MGC Document 104 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/21/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

Copies furnished to:

Melissa Damian, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Counsel of record 

Case 1:20-cv-22160-MGC Document 104 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/21/2022 Page 2 of 2