### Name: John M. McManus

Title: Vice President, Environmental Service Company: Amercian Electric Power Sign Date: 6/30/2010 Name: Scott W. Banach Title: Director Project Engineering Company: Platt Environmental Services, Inc. Sign Date: 6/25/2010 Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date 

## Amos 3 Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 1 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010 Facility Information:

John E. Amos

P.O. Box 4000

Winfield W25177
Contact:Paul Jackson

Phone: 614-716-3278

Fax: 614-716-1252
Email: pmjackson@aep.com Testing Company:
Platt Environmental Services, Inc 1520 Kensington Road

Suite 204

Oak Brook IL60523
Contact:Scott Banach

Phone:630-521-9400

Fax: 630-521-9494
Email: sbanach@plattenv.com

Air Permit Number:
R30-07900006-2005 Permitted Source ID/Name:
Unit 3 Unit 3
Permitted Maximum Process Rate:
N/A Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:
N/A Target Process Test Rate
N/A

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram: Unit 3 is a bituminous coal fired unit rated at 11,936 mmBTU/hr equipped with an SCR, FGD, and precipitator.

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates. Industry/SCC/NAIS221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information: AFS #: FRS #:

SCC / Description10100202 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal - Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Bituminous Coal)

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width
Stack 510.12 1020 4081 4 0 24 0 0

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test Runs Test Run

Duration Sample

Points Comments Location Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 0 Stack Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 0 Stack O2 Method 3A O2 3 0 Stack Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 0 Stack



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 2 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 3 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010 Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary



### Location Stack - Method 26A Average
Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Test Date 5/12/2010 5/12/2010 5/13/2010

Run Start Time 7:50:00 AM1:50:00 PM 9:10:00 AM

Run Finish Time 11:13:00 AM5:08:00 PM12:29:00 PM
Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 121.567 121.496 126.476 123.180
Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 14.20 14.15 14.55 14.300 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 14.17 13.98 14.99 14.380
Carbon Dioxide, % 12.2 11.9 12.1 12.067 Oxygen, % 7.3 7.2 6.9 7.133 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 126.25 125.75 128.46 126.820 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3,228,114.83,253,287.2 3,335,184.13,272,195.36 7
Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 4,335,372.44,355,810.2 4,498,875.04,396,685.86 7 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.3 99.4 101.0 100.233
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Location Stack - Method 3A CO2 Average
Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 5/12/2010 5/12/2010 5/12/2010

Run Start Time 7:53:00 AM 9:53:00 AM 1:50:00 PM

Run Finish Time 9:52:00 AM 11:13:00 AM 3:49:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 12.2 12.2 11.9 12.100 Oxygen, % 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.267 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3227072 3227072 32545323,236,225.33 3
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000
Moisture, % 14.2 14.2 14 14.133 Fuel Type Coal - Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 4 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2 Average
Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 5/12/2010 5/12/2010 5/12/2010

Run Start Time 7:53:00 AM 9:53:00 AM 1:50:00 PM

Run Finish Time 9:52:00 AM 11:13:00 AM 3:49:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 12.2 12.2 11.9 12.100 Oxygen, % 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.267 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3227072 3227072 32545323,236,225.33 3
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000
Moisture, % 14.2 14.2 14 14.133 Fuel Type Coal - Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 5 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010 Emissions Summary

Process Run Data 

### Location: Stack - Method 26A Compound: Hydrogen Chloride Average RunNumber M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3 Mass_mg 1.2 0.94 1.4 1.180 lb/mmBtuO2 3.27E-04 2.54E-04 3.56E-04 0.000


### Compound: Hydrogen Fluoride Average RunNumber M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3 Mass_mg 0.31 0.26 0.31 0.293 lb/mmBtuO2 8.45E-05 7.04E-05 7.89E-05 0.000



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 6 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010
Process Run Data



### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value
1 Bituminous Coal Burned 734 kilo pound/ hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 750



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 7 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010

1 Gross Load 962 MW The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1300



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 8 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010

1 Steam Temperature 999 F The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1000



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 9 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010

1 Steam Pressure 2482 psig The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 2500



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 10 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010

1 Opacity 3.5 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 10



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 11 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010

2 Bituminous Coal Burned 734 kilo pound/ hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 750



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 12 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010

2 Gross Load 962 MW The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1300



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 13 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010

2 Steam Temperature 999 F The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1000



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 14 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010

2 Steam Pressure 2482 psig The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 2500



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 15 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010

2 Opacity 3.5 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 10



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 16 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010
3 Bituminous Coal Burned 963 kilo pound/ hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 750



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 17 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010
3 Gross Load 1242 MW The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1300



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 18 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010
3 Steam Temperature 1005 F The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1000



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 19 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010
3 Steam Pressure 3262 psig The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 2500



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 20 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data 3 Opacity 7.97 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 10



### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value
1 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 3.5 % 10



### 2 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 3.5 % 10

3 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 3.5 % 10



### 1 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION) 0.04 lb/mmBTU 0.04

2 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION) 0.04 lb/mmBTU 0.04

3 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION) 0.04 lb/mmBTU 0.04



### 1 SCRUBBER 22 ppm 23

2 SCRUBBER 22 ppm 23

3 SCRUBBER 22 ppm 23



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 21 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 22 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010
Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail



### Location Stack - Method 26A Average Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3
Test Date 5/12/2010 5/12/2010 5/13/2010 Run Start Time 7:50:00 AM 1:50:00 PM 9:10:00 AM Run Finish Time 11:13:00 AM 5:08:00 PM12:29:00 PM Net Traversing Points 28 28 28 Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.233 0.233 0.233 0.233 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.995 0.995 0.995 0.995 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.85 28.85 28.97 28.890 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.55 1.57 1.67 1.597 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 134.347 133.830 138.928 135.702 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 102.04 100.23 101.13 101.133 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 121.567 121.496 126.476 123.180 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 427.4 425.5 457.7 436.867 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 20.12 20.03 21.54 20.563 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 14.20 14.15 14.55 14.300 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 14.17 13.98 14.99 14.380 Dry Mole Fraction 0.8583 0.8602 0.8545 0.858 Carbon Dioxide, % 12.2 11.9 12.1 12.067 Oxygen, % 7.3 7.2 6.9 7.133 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.5 80.9 81 80.800 Fuel Factor 1.11 1.15 1.16 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.24 30.19 30.21 30.213 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.51 28.52 28.43 28.487 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.4 -0.4 -0.5 -0.433 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.82 28.82 28.93 28.857 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 126.25 125.75 128.46 126.820 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.7043222778 828580.711918079

9460350.756323509

525023 0.724

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 50.91 51.15 52.83 51.630 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 1,419.293 1,419.293 1,419.293 1,419.293 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3,228,114.8 3,253,287.2 3,335,184.13,272,195.3 67 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 4,335,372.4 4,355,810.2 4,498,875.04,396,685.8 67 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.3 99.4 101.0 100.233 Percent Excess Air, % 52.3 50.9 47.6 50.267 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000 Round Duct Diameter, inches 510.12 510.12 510.12 Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0 Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0
Fw 10640 10640 1064010,640.000
Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 23 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2 Average Run Number 1 2 3
Test Date 5/12/2010 5/12/2010 5/12/2010 Run Start Time 7:53:00 AM9:53:00 AM 1:50:00 PM Run Finish Time 9:52:00 AM11:13:00 AM 3:49:00 PM Carbon Dioxide, % 12.2 12.2 11.9 12.100 Oxygen, % 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.267 Fuel Factor 1.11 1.11 1.15 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3227072 3227072 32545323,236,225.3 33 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000 Moisture, % 14.2 14.2 14 14.133 Analyzer Make ServoMex ServoMex ServoMex Analyzer Model 01440D1 01440D1 01440D114,400.000 Analyzer Serial Number 3790 3790 3790 3,790.000 Operating Range 20 20 20 20.000 Operating Units % % % No. Readings/Avg. 119 80 119 106.000 Calibration Set 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID CC266906- CO2 CC266906-

CO2 CC266906-

CO2 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.030 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID CC287521- CO2 CC287521-

CO2 CC287521-

CO2 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 9.86 9.88 9.88 9.873 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias 0 0.1 0.1 0.067 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID CC266906- CO2 CC266906-

CO2 CC266906-

CO2 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response -0.03 -0.03 0.01 -0.017 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0.2 0.067 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0 0 0.2 0.067 Calibration Post High Cylinder ID CC287521- CO2 CC287521-

CO2 CC287521-

CO2 Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 9.88 9.88 9.91 9.890 Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias 0.1 0.1 0.25 0.150 Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.1 0 0.15 0.083 Cavg 12.1 12.2 11.8 12.033 Cavg Units %vd %vd %vd Cgas 12.0479 12.135 11.7242 11.969 Cgas Units %vd %vd %vd Fuel Type Coal - Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous
Fw 10640 10640 1064010,640.000
Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000 Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000 Cgasw Units



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 24 of 24

### Amos 3

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2 Average Run Number 1 2 3
Test Date 5/12/2010 5/12/2010 5/12/2010 Run Start Time 7:53:00 AM9:53:00 AM 1:50:00 PM Run Finish Time 9:52:00 AM11:13:00 AM 3:49:00 PM Carbon Dioxide, % 12.2 12.2 11.9 12.100 Oxygen, % 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.267 Fuel Factor 1.11 1.11 1.15 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3227072 3227072 32545323,236,225.3 33 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000 Moisture, % 14.2 14.2 14 14.133 Analyzer Make ServoMex ServoMex ServoMex Analyzer Model 01440D1 01440D1 01440D114,400.000 Analyzer Serial Number 3790 3790 3790 3,790.000 Operating Range 25 25 25 25.000 Operating Units % % % No. Readings/Avg. 119 80 119 106.000 Calibration Set 1 1 1 1.000 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID CC287521-O2 CC287521- O2 CC287521-

O2 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response -0.03 -0.05 -0.05 -0.043 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 -0.08 -0.08 -0.053 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID CC266906-O2 CC266906- O2 CC266906-

O2 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 12.42 12.62 12.62 12.553 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias 0 0.8 0.8 0.533 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID CC287521-O2 CC287521- O2 CC287521-

O2 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response -0.05 -0.05 0 -0.033 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias -0.08 -0.08 0.12 -0.013 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0.08 0 0.2 0.093 Calibration Post High Cylinder ID CC266906-O2 CC266906- O2 CC266906-

O2 Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 12.62 12.62 12.5 12.580 Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias 0.8 0.8 0.32 0.640 Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.8 0 0.48 0.427 Cavg 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.267 Cavg Units %vd %vd %vd Cgas 7.2699 7.2166 7.1418 7.209 Cgas Units %vd %vd %vd Fuel Type Coal - Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous Coal -

Bituminous
Fw 10640 10640 1064010,640.000
Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000 Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000 Cgasw Units



### Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 25 of 24