alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 361.4 Matching contributions. ( a ) All State assistance will be cost shared after the first year of funding. States which received a grant before October 1, 1990, which included the 50 percent non-Federal contribution to the State program, will continue to match the Federal funds on a 50 percent cash match basis.
( b ) States which did not receive a grant before October 1, 1990, will assume cost sharing on a phased-in basis over a period of four years with the full cost sharing requirements being implemented in the fourth year. The sequence is as follows: ( 1 ) For the first fiscal year, cost sharing will be voluntary. FEMA will provide State assistance without requiring a State match. Those States that are able to cost-share are encouraged to do so (on either a cash or in-kind basis).
( 2 ) For the second fiscal year, the minimum acceptable non-Federal contribution is 25 percent of the total project cost, which may be satisfied through an in-kind contribution. Those States that are able to cost-share on a cash-contribution basis are encouraged to do so.
( 3 ) For the third fiscal year, the minimum acceptable non-Federal contribution is 35 percent of the total project cost, which may be satisfied through an in-kind contribution. Those States that are able to cost-share on a cash-contribution basis are encouraged to do so.
( 4 ) For the fourth and subsequent fiscal years, full cost sharing will be implemented, requiring a minimum of a 50 percent non-Federal contribution to a State program, with this share required to be cash. In-kind matching will no longer be acceptable. Thus, every dollar FEMA provides to a State must be matched by one dollar from the State. States that can contribute an amount greater than that required by the match are permitted and encouraged to do so. However, State assistance will not exceed the established target allocation.
( c ) The State contribution need not be applied at the exact time of the obligation of the Federal funds. However, the State full matching share must be obligated by the end of the project period for which the State assistance has been made available for obligation under an approved program or budget.
( d ) In the event a State interrupts its participation in this program, if it later elects to participate again, the nature and amount of that State's cost sharing shall be determined by the regulations then in effect, taking into account the number of years in which the State previously participated.
Editorial Note on Part 126
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 126.300 How may a concern be certified as a HUBZone small business concern? ( a ) A concern must apply to SBA for HUBZone certification. SBA will consider the information provided by the concern in order to determine whether the concern qualifies.
( b ) SBA, at its discretion, may rely solely upon the information submitted, may request additional information, may conduct independent research, or may verify the information before making an eligibility determination.
( c ) If SBA determines that a concern meets the eligibility requirements of a HUBZone small business concern, it will notify the concern and designate the concern as a certified HUBZone small business concern in DSBS (or successor system).
[84 FR 65243, Nov. 26, 2019]
Exhibit 31.1

Certifications







I, Stephen G. Snyder, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F/A of TransAlta Corporation;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.







Dated:  October 20, 2005





/s/ S.G. Snyder



Stephen G. Snyder

President and Chief Executive Officer
No: 24-006 January 19, 2024 

CONTACT: Ivonne Couret, 301-415-8200 

NRC’s 36th Annual Regulatory Information Conference to 

Focus on Adapting to a Changing Landscape

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has opened registration for the agency’s 

36th annual Regulatory Information Conference, to be held March 12-14 in North Bethesda, 

Maryland, and online. Several thousand conferees from the United States and around the world 

are expected to attend this three-day hybrid event. 

This year’s conference will focus on adapting to a changing landscape, starting with an 

address from Chair Christopher T. Hanson, during which he will share his observations and 

priorities for the agency. 

On March 12, Chair Hanson will host a conversation with Lydie Evrard, Deputy Director 

General and Head of the Department of Nuclear Safety and Security at the International Atomic 

Energy Agency. 

“The RIC is the most significant and well-attended NRC event of the year. It gives 

attendees the opportunity to learn about the NRC's important safety and security mission and to 

share perspectives from inside and outside the agency and from around the world," said Hanson. 

Additional program highlights include plenary sessions with NRC Commissioners David 

A. Wright, Annie Caputo, and Bradley R. Crowell. The RIC plenary sessions will also include 

remarks by Ray Furstenau, the NRC acting executive director for operations; Andrea Veil, 

director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation; and John Tappert, acting director of the 

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. 

The conference, which is free to the public, is jointly hosted by the NRC’s offices of 

Nuclear Reactor Regulation and Nuclear Regulatory Research. Registration is required to attend. 

The full conference program and registration information is available on the NRC’s RIC website. 

Follow the NRC social media platforms and look for #NRCRIC2024.
[Exhibit 32.2]

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Med Gen, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report'), I, Paul B. Kravitz, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements
              of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
              presents, in all material respects, the financial
              condition and result of operations of the Company.


January 20, 2006

                                /s/ Jack Chien
                                -----------------------
                                Jack Chien,
                                Chief Financial Officer
§ 334.3 Background. ( a ) The GMR system is designed to take into account the need to mobilize the Nation's resources in response to a wide range of crisis or emergency situations. GMR is a flexible decision making process of preparedness and response actions which are appropriate to warning indicators or an event. Thus, GMR allows the government, as a whole, to take small or large, often reversible, steps to increase its national security emergency preparedness posture.
( b ) Crises, especially those resulting in major military activities, always have some political or economic context. As the risks of military action increase, nations undertake more extensive preparations over a longer period of time to increase their military power. Such preparations by potential adversaries shape the nature and gravity of the threat as well as its likelihood and timing of occurrence. These measures permit the development of reliable indicators of threat at an early time in the evolution of a crisis. Depending on the nature of the situation or event and the nation involved, these early warning indicators may emanate from the political, socio-economic and/or industrial sectors.
( c ) The GMR system enables the nation to approach mobilization planning and actions as part of the deterrent response capability and to use it to reduce the probability of conflict. Alternatively, if deterrence should fail, the GMR system would enable the nation to undertake a series of phased actions intended to increase its ability to meet defense and essential civilian requirements. The GMR system integrates the potential strength of the national economy into U.S. national security strategy.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 20

- 00530

- CV

Abelardo G. GONZALEZ

, Appellant

v.

Isidro R. ALANIZ and Pedro Morales,

Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Court

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CVK001190D1

Honorable Jose A. Lopez , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED.

No costs of appeal are taxed in this case because appellant is indigent

.

SIGNED March 23, 2022.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Norris Wessells, Deceased, Respondent, against Lockport Cotton Batting Company et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Santry, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 873.]
§ 146.605 Inspector General report. ( a ) The Inspector General, or other official as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, of each agency shall prepare and submit to Congress each year, commencing with submission of the President's Budget in 1991, an evaluation of the compliance of that agency with, and the effectiveness of, the requirements herein. The evaluation may include any recommended changes that may be necessary to strengthen or improve the requirements.
( b ) In the case of an agency that does not have an Inspector General, the agency official comparable to an Inspector General shall prepare and submit the annual report, or, if there is no such comparable official, the head of the agency shall prepare and submit the annual report.
( c ) The annual report shall be submitted at the same time the agency submits its annual budget justifications to Congress.
( d ) The annual report shall include the following: All alleged violations relating to the agency's covered Federal actions during the year covered by the report, the actions taken by the head of the agency in the year covered by the report with respect to those alleged violations and alleged violations in previous years, and the amounts of civil penalties imposed by the agency in the year covered by the report.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-61295-CIV-ALTMAN

JOSEPH AMODIO, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

CAVALRY INVESTMENT, LLC and

CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The Court hereby ORDERS the parties to show cause by July 24, 2020 why the 

following cases should not be consolidated: Amodio v. Cavalry Investment, LLC et al., 20-cv61295-RKA; and Titus v. Cavalry SPV I, LLC et al., 20-cv-61298-WPD. In the absence of a 

timely response, the Court may enter an Order consolidating the two cases without further notice.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 22nd day of July 2020.

 _________________________________

 ROY K. ALTMAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-61295-RKA Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2020 Page 1 of 1
### SUBCHAPTER II—RESEARCH AND TRAINING

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Title II of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, comprising this subchapter, was originally enacted by Pub. L. 93–112, title II, Sept. 26, 1973, 87 Stat. 374, and amended by Pub. L. 93–516, Dec. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1617; Pub. L. 93–651, Nov. 21, 1974, 89 Stat. 2–3; Pub. L. 94–230, Mar. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 211; Pub. L. 95–602, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2955; Pub. L. 96–88, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 668; Pub. L. 98–221, Feb. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 17; Pub. L. 99–506, Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1807; Pub. L. 100–630, Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3289; Pub. L. 102–52, June 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 260; Pub. L. 102–54, June 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 267; Pub. L. 102–569, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4344; Pub. L. 103–73, Aug. 11, 1993, 107 Stat. 718; Pub. L. 103–218, Mar. 9, 1994, 108 Stat. 50; Pub. L. 103–382, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3518. Title II is shown herein, however, as having been added by Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, §405, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1167, without reference to those intervening amendments because of the extensive revision of title II by Pub. L. 105–220.
### [§2256. Omitted]

#### Codification

Section, added Pub. L. 95–598, title II, §250(a), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2672, did not become effective pursuant to section 402(b) of Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy. Section read as follows:

#### §2256. Habeas corpus from bankruptcy courts

A bankruptcy court may issue a writ of habeas corpus—

(1) when appropriate to bring a person before the court—

(A) for examination;

(B) to testify; or

(C) to perform a duty imposed on such person under this title; or

(2) ordering the release of a debtor in a case under title 11 in custody under the judgment of a Federal or State court if—

(A) such debtor was arrested or imprisoned on process in any civil action;

(B) such process was issued for the collection of a debt—

(i) dischargeable under title 11; or

(ii) that is or will be provided for in a plan under chapter 11 or 13 of title 11; and

(C) before the issuance of such writ, notice and a hearing have been afforded the adverse party of such debtor in custody to contest the issuance of such writ.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2256, added Pub. L. 95–144, §3, Oct. 28, 1977, 91 Stat. 1220, related to jurisdiction of proceedings relating to transferred offenders, prior to transfer to section 3244 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, by Pub. L. 95–598, title III, §314(j), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2677.
### §455. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 455 was editorially reclassified as section 5345 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the Secretary/Administration on Aging; Performance 
Review Board Members

    Title 5, U.S.C. Section 4314(c)(4) of the Civil Service Reform Act 
of 1978, Public Law 95-454, requires that the appointment of 
Performance Review Board Members be published in the Federal Register.
    The following persons will serve on the Performance Review Boards 
or Panels, which oversee the evaluation of performance appraisals of 
Senior Executive Service members of the Department of Health and Human 
Services, Office of the Secretary/Administration on Aging: Evelyn 
White, Chair; David Cade; Robinsue Frohboese; George Strader; Edwin L. 
Walker; Ann Marie Lynch; John Jarman.

    Dated: October 12, 2004.
Evelyn White,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management.
[FR Doc. 04-23415 Filed 10-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5150-04-M
#### Revelone, Inc., Appellant, v. Arlind Realty Corporation et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for examination before trial unanimously reversed with printing disbursements to the appellant and motion granted as to items 1, 2, 4 (omitting the words “oral and”), 5 (omitting the words “knowledge of”), 6 (omitting the words “facts and circumstances of the composition”) and directing production of books and other papers for. use in accordance with the provisions of section 296 of the Civil Practice Act. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ, [See *post,*p. 958.]
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted), Dr. Adya S. Tripathi, Chief Executive Officer of TripathTechnology Inc. (the “Company”), and David P. Eichler, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

**1. **TheCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, asamended, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the “***Annual Report***”),fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

**2.**** **The information contained in the Annual Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

**In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 2nd day of April, 2003.

 

 
|   | /s/ Adya S. Tripathi                                             |                                                                   | /s/ David P. Eichler |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Adya S. Tripathi, Ph. D.  President and  Chief Executive Officer | David P. Eichler  Vice President, Finance and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-117 September 9, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT SALEM

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia,

Pa., have selected Jeff Laughlin as the new resident inspector at

Salem Nuclear Generating Station in Lower Alloways Creek

Township, N.J. He joins Senior Resident Inspector Michele Evans

and Resident Inspectors Ho Nieh and Ray Lorson at the Salem site.

Mr. Laughlin joined the NRC staff in August of 1991 as an

emergency preparedness specialist in the Region I Office. He

also has completed a rotational assignment as a resident

inspector at the Hope Creek nuclear plant.

Prior to joining the agency, Mr. Laughlin worked as an area

representative for The Navigators, a Christian Missionary

Organization, first at the U.S. Air Force Academy and then at

Randolph Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas. He was a

submarine officer in the United States Navy from June 1973

through March 1980.

Mr. Laughlin earned a Bachelor of Science degree in

electrical engineering from the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis,

Md., and a Master of Arts degree in international relations from

Saint Mary’s University in San Antonio, Texas.

Mr. Laughlin, his wife and four children live in

Downingtown, Pa.

The Salem resident inspectors can be reached at 609/935-

5151.

#
Exhibit 32



SIGNATURES



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350



In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 10-KSB) of Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. (the Company), we, James G. Graham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David A. Godwin, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge;



(a) the Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b) the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-KSB.



|    |  |                                       |  |  |  |       |  |               
|--- |  | ------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----- |  | --------------
|By: |  | /s/James G. Graham                    |  |  |  | Date: |  | March 24, 2004
|    |  | James G. Graham                       |  |  |  |       |  |               
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  |       |  |               
|    |  |                                       |  | 
|By: |  | /s/David A. Godwin                    |  |  |  | Date: |  | March 24, 2004
|    |  | David A. Godwin                       |  |  |  |       |  |               
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer               |  |  |  |       |  |
#### § 3214.16 Is there a special bond form I must use?

You must use a BLM-approved bond form (Form 3000-4, or Form 3000-4a, June 1988 or later editions) for corporate surety bonds and personal bonds.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-702 Rev. 0, 4/2012



### Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 10/3/2012 Sample Number:124155-001 Date Collected:09/24/2012 08:00 Date Received:9/26/2012 

### CPS Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL mg/L Bromide, Br 43.5 5 KLG EPA 300.1 1 10/03/2012 14:00 ug/L Selenium, Se 394 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 10/01/2012 15:02 mg/L Chloride, Cl 3750 20 KLG EPA 300.1 5 10/03/2012 13:33 mg/L Fluoride, F 60.3 1 KLG EPA 300.1 0.2 10/03/2012 14:00 

### Sample Number:124155-002 Date Collected:09/26/2012 08:00 Date Received:9/26/2012 

## CPS Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL mg/L Bromide, Br 35.8 5 KLG EPA 300.1 1 10/03/2012 14:39 ug/L Selenium, Se 381 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 10/01/2012 15:07 mg/L Chloride, Cl 3270 20 KLG EPA 300.1 5 10/03/2012 14:18 mg/L Fluoride, F 55.5 1 KLG EPA 300.1 0.2 10/03/2012 14:39

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 124155 Page 1 of 1