alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCSafety Culture

# Safety Conscious Work Environment

The Commission's policy statement, "Freedom of Employees in the Nuclear Industry to Raise Safety Concerns Without Fear of Retaliation," (61 FR 24336; May 14, 1996) describes a safety conscious work environment (SCWE) as a work environment where employees are encouraged to raise safety concerns and where concerns are promptly reviewed, given the proper priority based on their potential safety significance, and appropriately resolved with timely feedback to the originator of the concerns and to other employees as appropriate. SCWE is described as an attribute of safety culture in SECY-04-0111,"Recommended Staff Actions Regarding Agency Guidance in the Areas of Safety Conscious Work Environment and Safety Culture," August 30, 2004. Fostering an environment for raising concerns continues to be an important attribute of a positive nuclear safety culture, and was included as one of the traits of a positive safety culture in the NRC's Safety Culture Policy Statement (76 FR 34773; June 14, 2011).

Regulatory Issue Summary 2005-18 contains guidance for licensees, applicants for a license, holders of certificates of compliance, and their contractors on establishing and maintaining a safety conscious work environment.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, January 06, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Safety Culture Policy Statement
          - Safety Culture and Nuclear Reactors
          - Safety Culture and Nuclear Materials
          - Safety Culture and Nuclear Security
          - Information for Agreement States
          - Safety Conscious Work Environment
          - Outreach and Education Materials
          - Public Meetings and Presentations
          - Contact Us

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Related Information

            - NRC's Allegations Program
            - Safety Conscious Work Environment Policy Guidance
            - NRC Allegation Guidance Memorandum 2012-001, "Chilling Effect Letters"
            - Regulatory Issue Summary 2005-18

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, January 06, 2023
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 17 L

Corrective Action

FEDERAL REOUIREMENT FEDERALReM ClTATl~

ANAlOGOUS

STATE CITAT10N IN SCOPE

PART 264 • STANDARDS FOR THE OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE

TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILlTlES

SUBPART F • RELEASES FROM SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS

APPLICABILITY

solid waste

mana emant unit WAC 173-303-645(1)(a)(i

CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS

solid waste

manaaement unit WAC 173-303-646 'X 264.101la\ X

soeclfled In oermlt 264.101lb\ WAC 173-303-646(2)(() X

**

PART 270 - PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS

i.e-_ SUBPART F - SPECIAL FORMS OF PERMITS

PERMITS BY RULE

UIC permits Issued

270.60lbH3\ WAC 173-303-802(3) after 11/8184 X

NPDES permits Issued 270.60~(3) WAC 173~303-802(4)(c)(viii) after 11/8184 Mil ~(d) X

** ?tate requirements for corrective action at non-SWMUs are considered broade

ln scope. See Attorney Generalis statement for detailed disc~ssion. ~-

e· July 15. 1985 • Page 19 of 27
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CARNIVAL CORPORATION,

a Panamanian corporation,

 Plaintiff,

v.

DECURTIS LLC, a Delaware limited liability 

corporation, and DECURTIS 

CORPORATION,

a Florida corporation,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:20-cv-22945-RNS

DECLARATION OF JASON P. STEARNS IN SUPPORT OF DECURTIS LLC’S

AND DECURTIS CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 287 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 1 of 3
1

I, Jason P. Stearns , declare and state as follows:

1. I am an attorney admitted to practice in the State of Florida as counsel on behalf

of DeCurtis LLC and DeCurtis Corporation (together, “DeCurtis”) in this action. I submit this 

Declaration in support of DeCurtis’s Motion for Summary Judgment. I have personal knowledge 

of the facts stated below, and if called upon to testify to those facts, I could and would 

competently do so. 

2. Attached hereto as Exhibit AU is a true and correct copy of the 2021 Lok8 

Purchase and License Agreement (CARNIVAL00765736). 

I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this 25th day of April 2022 in Tampa, Florida. 

/s/ Jason P. Stearns 

Jason P. Stearns

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 287 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 2 of 3
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 25, 2022, I filed the foregoing Declaration of Jason P. 

Stearns in Support of DeCurtis LLC’s and DeCurtis Corporation’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment via CM/ECF which will serve all attorneys of record. 

By: /s/ Jason P. Stearns 

One of their attorneys

5973255

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 287 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter World Currency Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by
references to such financial instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      31,457,573
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,479,594<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,479,594<F2>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,199,764<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               990,877
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,208,887
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,208,887
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,208,887
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
loss on open contracts of $88,023.
<F2>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $465,560, accrued brokerage
commissions of $11,880, accrued management fees of $76,963, accrued
administrative expenses of $40,536, accrued transaction fees and costs
of $705 and accrued incentive fees of $489,472.
<F3>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $7,226,184, net
change in unrealized of ($1,330,691) and interest income of $304,271.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of ARAMARK Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 27, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Joseph Neubauer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    JOSEPH
NEUBAUERJoseph Neubauer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

JAMES DOWNING BRADY :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2544 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

Board File No. C 1

- 18

- 844

(Supreme Court of New Jersey, D

- 3 3 September Term 2017)

Attorney Registration No. 33415

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4 th day of January , 201 9

, having failed to respond to a Notice

and Order directing him to provide reasons against the imposition of reciprocal

discipline, J ames Downing Brady is suspended for three months from the practice of

law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. He shall compl y with all the provisions of

Pa.R.D.E. 217.
First Department,

July, 1943.

(July 2, 1943.)

#### Dominick J. Mecca, Jr., an Infant, by Marguerite P. Mecca, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

Defendant’s affidavit showed that on the date of the insured’s death the policy sued upon had lapsed for nonpayment of premiums. Affidavits submitted by plaintiff in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment failed to set forth any facts controverting this claim of defendant. Under the circumstances defendant’s motion for summary judgment should have been granted.

The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.
### Subtitle A—Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-22 March 7, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC NAMES DAVID P. BEAULIEU SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT MILLSTONE 2

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia,

Pa., have announced the promotion of David P. Beaulieu to the

NRC's Senior Resident Inspector at Millstone Station, Unit 2, in

Waterford, Conn. Mr. Beaulieu has been a Resident Inspector at

Millstone Unit 2 since July 1994.

Mr. Beaulieu joined the NRC as a reactor engineer in 1990.

From 1991 through 1994 he was a Resident Inspector at the Three

Mile Island nuclear plant in Middletown, Pa. Prior to joining

the agency, Mr. Beaulieu worked as a shift test engineer at the

Norfolk Naval Shipyard in Norfolk, Va. He received a Bachelors

of Science in marine engineering from the Maine Maritime Academy.

Mr. Beaulieu and his wife live in Salem, Conn.

Mr. Beaulieu and the other Resident Inspectors at Millstone

Station can be reached at 860/447-3170.

#
§ 429.33 What are the consequences for using Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies without authorization? ( a ) Reclamation may seek to collect the following: ( 1 ) All administrative costs incurred by Reclamation in resolving the unauthorized use;
( 2 ) All costs of removing structures, materials, improvements, or any other real or personal property;
( 3 ) All costs of rehabilitation of the land, facilities, or waterbodies as required by Reclamation.
( 4 ) The use fee that would have applied had your use been authorized from the date your unauthorized use began;
( 5 ) Interest accrued on the use fee from the date your unauthorized use began as specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section; and
( 6 ) The interest charge rate shall be the greater of either the rate prescribed quarterly in the Federal Register by the Department of the Treasury for application to overdue payments or the interest rate of 0.5 percent per month. The interest charge rate will be determined as of the due date and remain fixed for the duration of the delinquent period.
( b ) As an unauthorized user, you will receive a written notice in which Reclamation will outline the steps you need to perform to cease your unauthorized use.
( c ) If appropriate, you will receive a final determination letter detailing the applicable costs and fees, as set forth under paragraph (a) of this section, which must be paid to Reclamation for your unauthorized use. Payment must be made within 30 days of receipt of this letter unless Reclamation extends this deadline in writing. Failure to make timely payment may result in administrative or legal action being taken against you.
( d ) Reclamation may determine that issuing a use authorization to you for an existing unauthorized use is not appropriate; and may deny future use applications by you because of this behavior. As noted at § 429.15, use authorizations are always issued at Reclamation's discretion.
( e ) If, however, your unauthorized use is deemed by Reclamation to be an unintentional mistake, consideration may be given to issuing a use authorization provided that you qualify and meet the criteria at § 429.14; and, in addition to the normal costs, you agree to pay the following: ( 1 ) The use fee that would have been owed from the date your unauthorized use began; and
( 2 ) Interest accrued on the use fee from the date your unauthorized use began as specified in paragraph (f)(1) of this section.
( f ) Under no circumstances will your unauthorized use or payment of monies to the United States in association with an unauthorized use either: ( 1 ) Create any legal interest or color of title against the United States; or
( 2 ) Establish any right or preference to continue the unauthorized use.
( g ) Under part 423 of this chapter, unauthorized use of Reclamation land, facilities, or waterbodies is a trespass against the United States. You may be subject to legal action including criminal prosecution as specified under § 423.71.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Douglas P. Buth, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Appleton Papers Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Appleton Papers Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 24, 2005



|           |  |                              
|---------- |  | -----------------------------
|Signature: |  | /S/ DOUGLAS P. BUTH          
|           |  | Douglas P. Buth              
|           |  | Chairman, President and Chief
|           |  | Executive Officer
Exhibit
31.1
 
 Certification
of Chief Executive Officer
 pursuant
to Section 302 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
 
 I, W.
Bruce Comer III, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allegro Biodiesel
Corporation;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
    /s/
      W. Bruce Comer IIIName:
      W. Bruce Comer IIITitle:
      Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal
                Financial
      and Accounting Officer)
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 13 October 2005

in Case C-458/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht, Autonome Sektion für die Provinz Bozen, Parking Brixen GmbH v Gemeinde Brixen, Stadtwerke Brixen AG (1)

(Public procurement - Procedures for the award of public contracts - Service concession - Management of public pay car parks)

(2005/C 296/07)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-458/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Verwaltungsgericht, Autonome Sektion für die Provinz Bozen (Italy), made by decision of 23 July 2003, received at the Court on 30 October 2003, in the proceedings between Parking Brixen GmbH and Gemeinde Brixen and Stadtwerke Brixen AG — the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, K. Schiemann, K. Lenaerts, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur) and E. Juhász, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 13 October 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

----

(1)OJ C 7 of 10.01.2004.

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Guadalupe CANO-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40925.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Guadalupe Cano-Rodriguez (Cano) appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after a previous deportation. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We need not decide the applicability of the plea-agreement waivers in this case because the issue that Cano raises is foreclosed.

Cano’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Cano contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Cano properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.