alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: II-23-018 May 16, 2023

Contact: Dave Gasperson, 404-997-4417

NRC Schedules Public Meeting to Discuss 

Farley Nuclear Power Plant Performance

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting May 23 to discuss the 

2022 safety performance of the Joseph M. Farley nuclear power plant. The two-unit plant is located 

near Dothan, Alabama, and operated by Southern Nuclear Operating Co.

The meeting will be held from 6-7 p.m. Central time at the DoubleTree Hotel, 2740 Ross 

Clark Circle in Dothan. NRC staff responsible for plant inspections, including the resident 

inspectors based full-time at the site, will be available to answer questions at the meeting. 

The NRC concluded that Farley operated safely in 2022. However, in September 2022, the 

NRC launched a special inspection at the plant to review a security-related issue. During that 

inspection, the NRC identified a security-related finding that increased NRC oversight at the plant 

since October 2022.

The NRC will schedule an additional inspection to independently verify that the plant has 

taken sufficient corrective actions to address the problem.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. If an inspection finding or 

performance indicator has more than a very low safety significance, the NRC increases its 

oversight.

The annual assessment letter for the Farley plant, including upcoming inspection plans, is 

available on the NRC website. Current performance information for the site is available on the NRC 

website and updated quarterly.
### **CHAPTER 40A—BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES**

Sec.
599A.
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
599B.
Personnel management demonstration project  1

1  So in original. Does not conform to section catchline.
No: 23-032 June 14, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC to Hold Virtual Town Hall on Vendor Oversight June 21

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is hosting an online town hall meeting on 

vendor oversight on June 21. 

The meeting, from 1-4 p.m. Eastern time on Microsoft Teams, is open to the public. 

Those interested in participating must register through the town hall webpage. The town hall’s 

aim is to foster dialogue among a broad variety of stakeholders, including members of the public, 

licensees, applicants, industry organizations, and vendors of safety-related parts, materials, and 

services.

The town hall’s topics will include the process for reporting product defects, the sampling 

of commercial-grade items considered for use in nuclear reactors, and the future of electric 

cabling qualification. Most of the meeting will be reserved for participants to ask questions to 

NRC staff on vendor oversight-related issues. For more information, please contact 

Ayo Ayegbusi by email at Odunayo.Ayegbusi@nrc.gov or by phone at (301) 415-8107.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Technical Assistance Request, Interpretation of the 10 CFR 30.13 Exemption

## HPPOS-275 PDR-9306140057

See the memorandum from J. E. Glenn to J. A. Grobe dated February 27, 1992.

This memo responds to a technical assistance request concerning an inquiry on interpretation of the 10 CFR 30.13 exemption by Stan A. Huber Consultants, Inc. (see enclosed letter dated January 29, 1992). The description of proposed operations which includes load consolidation, packaging, surveying, and/or manifesting requires a specific license in accordance with 10 CFR 30.32 and many require an environmental assessment if operations are not categorically exempt in accordance with 10 CFR 51.22 (c) (14) (xii). The exemption in 10 CFR 30.13 applies only to common and contract carriers, freight forwarders, warehousemen, and the U.S. Postal Service to the extent that they transport or store byproduct material in the regular course of carriage for another or storage incident thereto.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 30.13, 10 CFR 30.32, 10 CFR 51.22

**Subject codes:** 11.1, 12.17

**Applicability:** Byproduct material

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 30, 2017
§ 307.3 Use of Economic Adjustment Assistance Investments. Economic Adjustment Assistance Investments may be used to develop a CEDS to alleviate long-term economic deterioration or a sudden and severe economic dislocation (a *“Strategy Grant”*), or to fund a Project implementing such a CEDS (an *“Implementation Grant”*). ( a ) Strategy Grants support developing, updating or refining a CEDS.
( b ) Implementation Grants support the execution of activities identified in a CEDS. Specific activities may be funded as separate Investments or as multiple elements of a single Investment. Examples of Implementation Grant activities include: ( 1 ) Infrastructure (as defined in § 301.11 of this chapter) improvements, such as site acquisition, site preparation, construction, rehabilitation and equipping of facilities;
( 2 ) Provision of business or infrastructure financing through the capitalization of Recipient-administered Revolving Loan Funds (“*RLFs”*), which may include loans and interest rate buy-downs to facilitate business lending activities;
( 3 ) Market or industry research and analysis;
( 4 ) Technical assistance, including organizational development such as business networking, restructuring or improving the delivery of business services, or feasibility studies;
( 5 ) Public services;
( 6 ) Training; and
( 7 ) Other activities justified by the CEDS that satisfy applicable statutory and regulatory requirements.
[71 FR 56675, Sept. 27, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 76132, Dec. 19, 2014]
Exhibit 4.474

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 185833 dated April 03, 2021

 

For Rendering

 

Data transmission services, except for data transmission services for the purpose of voice transmission

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until April 03, 2026.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated December 09, 2020 No. 531-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   O.А. Terlyakov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 122840
#### Grace Phillips v. Andrew Phillips.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-92

November 2, 1999

NRC ASSIGNS NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT GINNA NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia,

Pa., have selected Ho K. Nieh, Jr., as the new senior resident

inspector at the Robert E. Ginna Nuclear Plant near Rochester,

N.Y.

He succeeds Peter Drysdale, who was reassigned as the senior

resident inspector at Indian Point 3, in Buchanan, N.Y.

Most recently, Mr. Nieh was a resident inspector at Salem

Nuclear Generating Station in Hancock’s Bridge, New Jersey. He

joined the NRC in April 1997 as a reactor engineer in the Region

I office. Prior to joining the agency, he worked at the Knolls

Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL) in Ballston Spa, NY. He completed

the U.S. Navy's nuclear training program and was a nuclear plant

engineer at a naval nuclear prototype plant for KAPL.

Mr. Nieh is a graduate of the Maritime College of the State

University of New York, where he earned a Bachelor's of

Engineering degree (with honors) in marine engineering.

Mr. Nieh will be joined at Ginna by Christopher Welch. The

NRC resident inspectors at Ginna can be reached at 315/524-6935.

#
#### Ludwig Scheidig, Respondent, v. Frank Weber, Appellant.

Judgment and order of the County Court of Queens county affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
§ 45.40 What are the requirements for prehearing conferences? ( a ) *Initial prehearing conference.* The ALJ will conduct an initial prehearing conference with the parties at the time specified in the notice under § 45.30, on or about the 20th day after the effective date stated in the referral notice under § 45.26(c)(4), 7 CFR 1.626(c)(4), or 50 CFR 221.26(c)(4). ( 1 ) The initial prehearing conference will be used: ( i ) To identify, narrow, and clarify the disputed issues of material fact and exclude issues that do not qualify for review as factual, material, and disputed;
( ii ) To consider the parties' motions for discovery under § 45.41 and to set a deadline for the completion of discovery;
( iii ) To discuss the evidence on which each party intends to rely at the hearing;
( iv ) To set deadlines for submission of written testimony under § 45.52 and exchange of exhibits to be offered as evidence under § 45.54; and
( v ) To set the date, time, and place of the hearing.
( 2 ) The initial prehearing conference may also be used: ( i ) To discuss limiting and grouping witnesses to avoid duplication;
( ii ) To discuss stipulations of fact and of the content and authenticity of documents;
( iii ) To consider requests that the ALJ take official notice of public records or other matters;
( iv ) To discuss the submission of written testimony, briefs, or other documents in electronic form; and
( v ) To consider any other matters that may aid in the disposition of the case.
( b ) *Other conferences.* The ALJ may in his or her discretion direct the parties to attend one or more other prehearing conferences, if consistent with the need to complete the hearing process within 90 days. Any party may by motion request a conference.
( c ) *Notice.* The ALJ must give the parties reasonable notice of the time and place of any conference. A conference will ordinarily be held by telephone, unless the ALJ orders otherwise.
( d ) *Preparation.* ( 1 ) Each party's representative must be fully prepared to discuss all issues pertinent to that party that are properly before the conference, both procedural and substantive. The representative must be authorized to commit the party that he or she represents respecting those issues.
( 2 ) Before the date set for the initial prehearing conference, the parties' representatives must make a good faith effort: ( i ) To meet in person, by telephone, or by other appropriate means; and
( ii ) To reach agreement on discovery and the schedule of remaining steps in the hearing process.
( e ) *Failure to attend.* Unless the ALJ orders otherwise, a party that fails to attend or participate in a conference, after being served with reasonable notice of its time and place, waives all objections to any agreements reached in the conference and to any consequent orders or rulings.
( f ) *Scope.* During a conference, the ALJ may dispose of any procedural matters related to the case.
( g ) *Order.* Within 2 days after the conclusion of each conference, the ALJ must issue an order that recites any agreements reached at the conference and any rulings made by the ALJ during or as a result of the conference.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23336]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Core (P30) and Infrastructure (R24) Grant Applications.
    Date: November 10, 2004.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Anne E Schaffner, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye 
Institute, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, MSC 9300, Bethesda, MD 
20892-9300, (301) 451-2020, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 12, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-23336 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
### §§91, 92. Repealed. Aug. 27, 1935, ch. 740, title I, §1, 49 Stat. 872

Section 91, acts Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 473, §1, 45 Stat. 1446; Jan. 15, 1931, ch. 29, 46 Stat. 1036, set forth maximum penalties that could be imposed in a criminal prosecution for illegal manufacture, sale, transportation, importation, or exportation of intoxicating liquor, as defined in section 4 of this title.

Section 92, act Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 473, §2, 45 Stat. 1446, provided that section 91 of this title did not operate to repeal or eliminate any minimum penalty provided by this title for first or subsequent offense.
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

101 Marietta St., Suite 2900, Atlanta, GA 30323

Tel. 404-331-5503 or 7878

No: II-97-10 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark (404) 331-5503 (Thursday, January 16, 1997)

Roger Hannah (404) 331-7878

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE

TO DISCUSS CRYSTAL RIVER ENGINEERING CONCERNS WITH

FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a

predecisional enforcement conference with Florida Power Corporation

on January 24 to discuss apparent violations at the Crystal River

nuclear power plant related to the company's engineering program.

The NRC staff is considering 11 apparent violations for

escalated enforcement action. They were identified in two

separate inspection reports. In a letter sent to FPC with the

second inspection report, Johns Jaudon, director of the NRC

Region II Division of Reactor Safety, said the apparent

violations "indicate that a broad spectrum of problems existed

affecting multiple areas of your Engineering program." The areas

include NRC-required evaluations of certain equipment or system

changes within the plant, design control, corrective action

implementation and procedures.

The enforcement conference will be held in Atlanta at 10:00

a.m. in the NRC's regional office, located at 101 Marietta

Street, N.W., Suite 2900. The meeting is open to observation by

the public and the media, and NRC officials will be available at

its conclusion to answer questions from interested observers.

NRC officials said the decision to hold an enforcement

conference does not mean that a determination has been made that

a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be

taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent violations,

their causes, and safety significance; to provide the licensee an

opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in

the NRC inspection report; and to enable the company to outline

its proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated

enforcement action, such as a civil penalty, will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later time.

Recorded information on upcoming enforcement conferences is

also available by calling 1-800-952-9674.
#### § 4710.3-2 Wild horse and burro ranges.

Herd management areas may also be designated as wild horse or burro ranges to be managed principally, but not necessarily exclusively, for wild horse or burro herds.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCarbon stars with oxygen-rich circumstellar materialThe IUE satellite was used to search for companions to two carbon-rich stars with oxygen-rich circumstellar envelopes, EU And and V778 Cyg. Depending upon the amount of interstellar extinction and distances (probably between 1 and 2 kpc from the Sun) to these two stars, upper limits were placed between approx. 1.5 and 6 solar mass to the mass of any main sequence companions. For the 'near' distance of 1 kpc, it seems unlikely that there are white dwarf companions because the detection would be expected of ultraviolet emission from accretion of red giant wind material onto the white dwarf. A new model is proposed to explain the oxygen-rich envelopes. If these stars have a high nitrogen abundance, the carbon that is in excess of the oxygen may be carried in the circumstellar envelopes in HCN rather than C2H2 which is a likely key seed molecule for the formation of carbon grains. Consequently, carbon particles may not form; instead, oxygen-rich silicate dust may nucleate from the SiO present in the outflow.Document ID19920011972Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsJura, Michael*(California Univ. Los Angeles, CA, United States)*Hawkins, I.*(California Univ. Berkeley., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 16, 1991Subject CategoryAstrophysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-190161NAS 1.26:190161Accession Number92N21215Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-1406CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS5-30180Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920011972.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 123.2 What are disaster loans and disaster declarations?

SBA offers low interest, fixed rate loans to disaster victims, enabling them to repair or replace property damaged or destroyed in declared disasters. It also offers such loans to affected small businesses to help them recover from economic injury caused by such disasters. SBA also offers interim guaranteed disaster loans, in participation with financial institutions, to affected small businesses (“IDAP loans”). Disaster declarations are official notices recognizing that specific geographic areas have been damaged by floods and other acts of nature, riots, civil disorders, or industrial accidents such as oil spills. These disasters are sudden events which cause severe physical damage, and do not include slower physical occurrences such as shoreline erosion or gradual land settling. However, *for purposes of economic injury disaster loans only,* they do include droughts and below average water levels in the Great Lakes or on any body of water in the United States that supports commerce by small businesses. Sudden events that cause substantial economic injury may be disasters even if they do not cause physical damage to a victim's property. Past examples include ocean conditions causing significant displacement (major ocean currents) or closure (toxic algae blooms) of customary fishing waters, as well as contamination of food or other products for human consumption from unforeseeable and unintended events beyond the control of the victims.

[61 FR 3304, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 71 FR 75409, Dec. 15, 2007; 75 FR 60597, Oct. 1, 2010; 81 FR 67903, Oct. 3, 2016]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-179 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, August 19, 1999)

NRC’S RESPONSE TO EPA’S ISSUANCE OF

DRAFT DOSE STANDARD FOR YUCCA MOUNTAIN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has been proceeding on a rulemaking that

involves radiation standards for a possible high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain,

Nevada, which are different from those advocated today by the Environmental Protection

Agency.

Given the extended time it takes to complete a rulemaking, the NRC is proceeding with

a regulation (Part 63 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations), which it issued for public

comment in February. The agency’s next step is to consider the comments received.

The Commission believes its proposed radiation dose limit of 25 millirems a year will

fully protect public health and safety and is consistent with recommendations of the National

Academy of Sciences and other national and international advisory bodies. The 25-millirem

limit proposed by the NRC may be compared to the Commission’s overall annual public dose

limit of 100 millirems which is consistent with national and international advisory body

recommendations. The Commission also has stated that there is no health and safety reason

for a separate groundwater protection requirement.

By contrast, EPA proposes a 15-millirem limit and a separate groundwater standard.

The NRC will file detailed comments on EPA’s proposed rule during the comment period,

explaining why it believes the NRC standards are fully protective.

By law, the NRC is required to amend its high-level waste rule to conform to a final rule

when it is promulgated by EPA. However, the NRC would be concerned with any provision in

the proposed standard that appeared intended to tell NRC how to implement the standard. The

NRC’s position is that Congress gave NRC the legal responsibility to implement the EPA

standard and that matters pertaining to implementation should be left to NRC.

Although the NRC’s proposed 25-millirem standard is not consistent with EPA’s

proposal, the NRC plans to proceed with its development of a final regulation in Part 63,

because (1) the Commission believes that they are fully protective; (2) the recently issued EPA
standard is not final; and (3) because the law requires NRC to complete its regulation within

one year of issuance of the EPA standard, which is a comparatively short time for NRC to

complete a rulemaking. By proceeding with finalization of Part 63, the NRC will have a simpler

task later, if EPA completes its rulemaking, because it expects to amend only the EPAstandard-related sections of Part 63 should they be different from those proposed by NRC.

If NRC issues a final Part 63 before the proposed EPA standard is finalized, and the

NRC regulation is inconsistent with the EPA regulation, NRC will modify Part 63, as required by

law.

###