alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 1278

SHANNON R. HAMILTON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:22

- ct

- 03101

- D )

Submitted : August 2 4 , 2023 Decided: August 25, 2023

Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Shannon R. Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1278 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Shannon R. Hamilton appeals the distric t court’s order dismissing without prejudice Hamilton’s complaint for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671

- 2680 . We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordin gly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Hamilton v.
United States , No. 5:22

- ct

- 03101

- D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 28, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and arg ument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1278 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 378

**Question 378:** If a worker formerly monitored at the licensee's facility as a "declared pregnant woman," requests that her exposure records be forwarded to her current employer, should related embryo / fetus dose records also be forwarded if not specifically requested?

**Answer:** No. Regulatory Guide 8.7, Rev. 1, includes the following statement in Section 3.2. "Licensees should be sensitive to the issue of personal privacy with regard to embryo / fetus dose. If requested by a monitored woman, a letter report may be provided to document prior embryo / fetus dose." Otherwise, the embryo / fetus dose records should not be provided.

(Reference: 10 CFR 19.13, 10 CFR 20.1208).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 24, 2017
#### § 108.700 Compliance with size standards in part 121 of this chapter as a condition of Assistance.

You are permitted to provide financial assistance and management services only to a Small Business. To determine whether an applicant meets the size standards for a Small Business, you may use either the financial size standards in § 121.301(c)(1) of this chapter or the industry standard covering the industry in which the applicant is primarily engaged, as set forth in § 121.301(c)(2) of this chapter.
### §3013. Modification or protective order; supervision of enforcement

The court may at any time on its own initiative or the motion of any interested person, and after such notice as it may require, make an order denying, limiting, conditioning, regulating, extending, or modifying the use of any enforcement procedure under this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVI, §3611, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4938.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Nov. 29, 1990, and applicable with respect to certain actions for debts owed the United States pending in court on that effective date, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101–647, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.
No: 23-064 October 4, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC to Hold Public Meetings on

Preliminary Regulatory Development for Fusion Systems

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold three virtual public meetings in 

October and November to seek public input on preliminary proposed rule language, draft 

guidance, and certain specific topics for the regulation of fusion energy systems.

The meetings will be held online Oct. 11 from 1-3 p.m., Nov. 1 from 1-4 p.m., and 

Nov. 9 from 1-4 p.m., all Eastern time. Specific details about the meetings, including how to join 

by webinar or phone, can be found in the NRC’s public meeting notices. The preliminary 

proposed rule language is available online. 

The Commission directed the staff earlier this year to develop regulations for licensing 

fusion energy systems by amending the existing byproduct material requirements in 10 Code of 

Federal Regulation Part 30. The regulations will take into account the fusion energy systems that 

have already been licensed and are being regulated by the states as well as developments in 

fusion technology. The staff also was directed to develop licensing guidance in a new, dedicated 

volume of the NUREG-1556 series. 

The staff’s goal is to have a proposed rule ready for Commission consideration in early 

2025. The meetings are a continuation of public outreach that will extend throughout the 

rulemaking process. 

Documents related to this rulemaking can be found on www.regulations.gov under 

Docket ID NRC-2023-0071.
#### John Festino, Appellant, v. Cushing Stone Company, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffeman, Deyo, Santry and Bergan, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 16, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), American Water Works Association (“AWWA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: American Water Works Association, Denver, Co. The nature and scope of AWWA's standards development activities are: To develop, adopt, and publish voluntary consensus standards that set out the minimum requirements of products or processes used in the water profession. AWWA standards address, where appropriate, procedures of design; characteristics of materials, substances, products, equipment, systems or services; processes of manufacturing, assembly, transporting, storage or installation; techniques of analysis; testing and inspection methods and requirements; parameters of use; and such other elements essential to provide adequate reliability, life and usage in the water profession. AWWA's voluntary consensus standards are developed by AWWA members and other interested parties.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-22888 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### §1749. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 97–399, §10, Dec. 31, 1982, 96 Stat. 2016, which described certain consequences in the event the Settlement Agreement ever became invalidated, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### Peter W. Sothman and Fritz P. Mansbendel, Appellants, v. William G. Rockefeller, Defendant, Impleaded with The Standard Gas Power Corporation and Henry M. Ward, Respondents.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 20-22694-CIV:-WILLIAMS (SEITZ) 

ROBERTO PAGUAGA, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

PINNACLE ONE PRICE DRY CLEANING 

OF DA VIE, LLC d/b/a PINNACLE 

CLEANERS, a Florida Limited Liability 

Company and ERIC DRAUDT, individually, 

and GALINA DRAUDT, individually, 

Defendants. 

I ---------------' 

FINAL JUDGMENT 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and the jury verdict rendered in this action on July 30, 

2021, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

Final Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff ROBERTO PAGUAGA as to the Count 

One, the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq., ("FLSA") overtime claim, and 

Plaintiff shall recover from Defendants PINNACLE ONE PRICE DRY CLEANING OF 

DA VIE, LLC d/b/a PINNACLE CLEANERS, ERIC DRAUDT and GALINA DRAUDT, the 

amount of $3 318. 7 5 in overtime pay, and an equal amount in liquidated damages, for a total 

award of $6637.50, plus applicable interest, and costs. On Count Two, the FLSA retaliation 

claim, Plaintiff will recover nothing as the jury found for Defendants. 

DONE and ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this "d-;.ay of February, 2022. 

~~, PATRIIA A SITZ ., 4 

UNITED STA TES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 

cc: Counsel of record 

Case 1:20-cv-22694-KMW Document 122 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/04/2022 Page 1 of 1
HomeAbout NRCFire ProtectionRelated Information

# Generic Issues Related to Fire Protection

Through its assessment of plant operation, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has identified certain issues, involving public health and safety, the common defense and security, or the environment, which could affect multiple entities under NRC jurisdiction. We document and track the resolution of these generic issues (GIs) through our Generic Issues Program (GIP), as required by Congress under Section 210 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (Public Law 95-209). Under the GIP, NRC staff may take actions in five distinct stages, including Identification, Acceptance Review, Screening, Safety / Risk Assessment, and Regulatory Assessment. In addition, the NRC staff tracks and reports the generic issue status and resolution to Congress and the public. In each case, the resolution of these issues may involve new or revised rules, new or revised guidance, or revised interpretation of rules or guidance that affect nuclear power plant licensees, nuclear material certificate holders, or holders of other regulatory approvals.

The following table lists (in chronological order) the generic issues that the NRC has addressed in areas related to fire protection for licensed facilities and materials. A collection of Recent Generic Issues is available through the NRC Library. For related information, see Generic Issues Program.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, August 20, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 10 CFR Part 50
          - Guidelines for FP in NPPs
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Procedures
          - Administrative Letters
          - Bulletins
          - Circulars
          - Generic Letters
          - Information Notices
          - Regulatory Issue Summaries
          - Regulatory Guides
          - Commission (SECY) Papers
          - Generic Issues
          - Staff-Prepared NUREGs
          - Contractor-Prepared NUREGs
          - Conference Proceedings
          - Brochures
          - FAQs About Fire Protection

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, August 20, 2021
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Dale E. Parker, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Appleton Papers Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Appleton Papers Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



March 24, 2005



|           |  |                                           
|---------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Signature: |  | /S/ DALE E. PARKER                        
|           |  | Dale E. Parker                            
|           |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
----

**Exhibit      32**

**Certification      pursuant to**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as      adopted pursuant to**

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1. | the                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March                22, 2007 | /s/                Thomas R. Butkus                  |   |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date                          | Chairman                of the Board and Chief       |   |
|                          | Executive                Officer                     |   |
|                          |                                                 |   |
|                          |                                                 |   |
| March                22, 2007 | /s/                Lyn G. Rupich                     |   |
| Date                          | President                and Chief Operating Officer |   |
|                          |                                                 |   |
|                          |                                                 |   |
| March                22, 2007 | /s/                Pamela N. Favero                  |   |
| Date                          | Chief                Financial Officer               |   |

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn initial investigation into methods of computing transonic aerodynamic sensitivity coefficientsContinuing studies associated with the development of the quasi-analytical (QA) sensitivity method for three dimensional transonic flow about wings are presented. Furthermore, initial results using the quasi-analytical approach were obtained and compared to those computed using the finite difference (FD) approach. The basic goals achieved were: (1) carrying out various debugging operations pertaining to the quasi-analytical method; (2) addition of section design variables to the sensitivity equation in the form of multiple right hand sides; (3) reconfiguring the analysis/sensitivity package in order to facilitate the execution of analysis/FD/QA test cases; and (4) enhancing the display of output data to allow careful examination of the results and to permit various comparisons of sensitivity derivatives obtained using the FC/QA methods to be conducted easily and quickly. In addition to discussing the above goals, the results of executing subcritical and supercritical test cases are presented.Document ID19910017816Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCarlson, Leland A.*(Texas A&M Univ. College Station, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1991Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-188644TAMRF-5802-91-02NAS 1.26:188644Accession Number91N27130Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-793Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910017816.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §1731. Handwriting

The admitted or proved handwriting of any person shall be admissible, for purposes of comparison, to determine genuineness of other handwriting attributed to such person.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 945.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §638 (Feb. 26, 1913, ch. 79, 37 Stat. 683).

Words "as a basis for comparison by witnesses, or by the jury, court, or officer conducting such proceeding", were omitted as superfluous.

Changes were made in phraseology.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,099
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (286)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         104,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                (48,601)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         23,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,344
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,285
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,415
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    35
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,185
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,185
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,185
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57


</TABLE>