7590 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices 

reconsideration of the Department of 

Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the 

application is denied. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 26th day of 

January, 2011. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–2966 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–72,740] 

Bruss North America Russell Springs, 

Kentucky; Notice of Revised 

Determination on Reconsideration 

Following the issuance of a 

determination applicable to workers and 

former workers of Bruss North America, 

Russell Springs, Kentucky (subject 

firm), regarding their application for 

Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA), the 

Department received new information 

relevant to the case. The initial 

determination was issued on May 28, 

2010. The Department’s Notice of 

Determination was published in the 

Federal Register on June 16, 2010 (75 

FR 34175). The subject workers are 

engaged in employment related to the 

production of automobile parts and 

component parts. The worker group 

does not include any on-site leased 

workers. 

New information obtained during a 

recent investigation for the subject firm 

revealed that there was a mistake of 

facts which were previously considered 

in the immediate case. Upon review, the 

Department has determined that the 

workers and former workers of Bruss 

North America, Russell Springs, 

Kentucky, who are engaged in 

employment related to the production of 

automobile parts and component parts, 

meet the criteria as Suppliers for 

secondary worker certification. 

Criterion I has been met because a 

significant number or proportion of the 

workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened with separation. 

Criterion II has been met because 

workers of Bruss North America, Russell 

Springs, Kentucky produced and sold 

automobile parts and component parts 

for a firm that employed a worker group 

eligible to apply for TAA and the 

component parts are related to the 

article that was the basis for the TAA 

certification. 

Criterion III has been met because the 

loss of business by Bruss North 

America, Russell Springs, Kentucky 

with the aforementioned firm, with 

respect to automobile parts and 

components sold to the firm, 

contributed importantly to worker 

separations at Bruss North America, 

Russell Springs, Kentucky. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the additional 

facts obtained on reconsideration, I 

determine that workers of the subject 

firm, who are engaged in employment 

related to the supply of automobile parts 

and components, meet the worker group 

certification criteria under Section 

222(c) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(c). In 

accordance with Section 223 of the Act, 

19 U.S.C. 2273, I make the following 

certification: 

‘‘All workers of Bruss North America, 

Russell Springs, Kentucky, who became 

totally or partially separated from 

employment on or after October 31, 2008, 

through two years from the date of this 

revised certification, and all workers in the 

group threatened with total or partial 

separation from employment on date of 

certification through two years from the date 

of certification, are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 

Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 

amended.’’ 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of 

February, 2011. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–2967 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 

Copyright Royalty Board 

[Docket No. 2008–2 CRB CD 2000–2003 

(Phase II)] 

Distribution of 2000, 2001, 2002, and 

2003 Cable Royalty Funds 

AGENCY: Copyright Royalty Board, 

Library of Congress. 

ACTION: Notice announcing 

commencement of Phase II proceeding 

with request for Petitions to Participate. 

SUMMARY: The Copyright Royalty Judges 

are announcing the commencement of a 

proceeding to determine the Phase II 

distribution of 2000, 2001, 2002, and 

2003 royalties collected under the cable 

statutory license. The Judges are also 

announcing the date by which a party 

who wishes to participate in this 

distribution proceeding must file its 

Petition to Participate and the 

accompanying $150 filing fee, if 

applicable. 

DATES: Petitions to Participate and the 

filing fee are due on or before March 14, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: An original, five copies, and 

an electronic copy in Portable 

Document Format (PDF) on a CD of the 

Petition to Participate, along with the 

$150 filing fee, may be delivered to the 

Copyright Royalty Board by either mail 

or hand delivery. Petitions to Participate 

and the $150 filing fee may not be 

delivered by an overnight delivery 

service other than the U.S. Postal 

Service Express Mail. If by mail 

(including overnight delivery), Petitions 

to Participate, along with the $150 filing 

fee, must be addressed to: Copyright 

Royalty Board, P.O. Box 70977, 

Washington, DC 20024–0977. If hand 

delivered by a private party, Petitions to 

Participate, along with the $150 filing 

fee, must be brought to the Library of 

Congress, James Madison Memorial 

Building, LM–401, 101 Independence 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20559– 

6000. If delivered by a commercial 

courier, Petitions to Participate, along 

with the $150 filing fee, if applicable, 

must be delivered to the Congressional 

Courier Acceptance Site, located at 2nd 

and D Street, NE., Washington, DC. The 

envelope must be addressed to: 

Copyright Royalty Board, Library of 

Congress, James Madison Memorial 

Building, LM–403, 101 Independence 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20559– 

6000. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

LaKeshia Brent, CRB Program 

Specialist, by telephone at (202) 707– 

7658, or e-mail at crb@loc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Each year, semiannually, cable 

systems must submit royalty payments 

to the Copyright Office as required by 

the cable statutory license for the 

privilege of retransmitting over-the-air 

television and radio broadcast signals. 

17 U.S.C. 111. These royalties are then 

distributed to copyright owners whose 

works were included in such 

retransmissions and who timely filed a 

claim for royalties. Distribution of the 

royalties for each calendar year are 

determined by the Copyright Royalty 

Judges (‘‘Judges’’) in two phases. At 

Phase I, the royalties are divided among 

the representatives of the major 

categories of copyrightable content 

(movies, sports programming, music, 

etc.) requesting the distribution. At 

Phase II, the royalties are divided among 

the various copyright owners within 

each category. 

The Judges published their final 

determination regarding the Phase I 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices 7591 

1 IPG filed an untimely response to the Motion on 

January 27, 2011. See 37 CFR 350.4(f) (oppositions 

to motions shall be filed within five business days 

of the filing of the motion). 

2The Copyright Royalty Judges Program 

Technical Corrections Act, Public Law 109–303, 

changed the amount from $10,000 to $1,000. 

distribution of the 2000–2003 cable 

royalties on May 12, 2010. 75 FR 26798. 

Thus, this Notice announcing the 

commencement of a proceeding under 

17 U.S.C. 803(b)(1) for distribution of 

cable royalties collected for 2000, 2001, 

2002, and 2003 is confined to Phase II. 

Commencement of Phase II Proceeding 

Consistent with 17 U.S.C. 804(b)(8), 

the Copyright Royalty Judges determine 

that a Phase II controversy exists as to 

the distribution of the 2000, 2001, 2002, 

and 2003 cable royalties. We reach this 

determination based on a Motion to 

Initiate Phase II Proceedings by the Joint 

Sports, Program Suppliers, and 

Devotional Claimants, three Phase I 

claimant groups, filed with the Judges 

on January 14, 2011. The Motion states 

that ‘‘[n]o pending controversies exist 

with respect to Phase I. However, 

controversies continue to exist with 

regard to Phase II in the devotional, 

sports, and syndicated programming 

categories. For example, one party, 

Independent Producers Group (‘IPG’), 

claims that it represents copyright 

owners with [unresolved] Phase II 

claims in each of these categories.’’ 

Motion at 1. The Motion further states 

that ‘‘[t]he Phase I Parties are also aware 

of other ongoing Phase II controversies, 

including ongoing Phase II controversies 

in the syndicated programming category 

between the MPAA-represented 

Program Suppliers and the NABrepresented Program Suppliers as to the 

2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003 royalty 

years, and between the MPAArepresented Program Suppliers and 

Home Shopping Network (‘HSN’) for the 

2002 and 2003 royalty years.’’ Motion at 

2. The Motion requests that the Judges 

commence a Phase II proceeding to 

resolve all outstanding Phase II 

controversies.1 In light of the 

outstanding Phase II controversies with 

respect to cable royalties for 2000, 2001, 

2002, and 2003, the Motion is granted. 

Petitions To Participate 

Petitions to Participate must be filed 

in accordance with 37 CFR 351.1(b)(2). 

Petitions to Participate submitted by 

interested parties whose claims do not 

exceed $1,000 must contain a statement 

that the party will not seek a 

distribution of more than $1,000.2 No 

filing fee is required for these parties. A 

party whose claim(s) exceed $1,000 

must submit a filing fee of $150 with its 

Petition to Participate or the Petition 

will be rejected. The filing fee must be 

paid by check or money order payable 

to the ‘‘Copyright Royalty Board.’’ If a 

check is returned for insufficient funds, 

the corresponding Petition to Participate 

will be dismissed. In accordance with 

37 CFR 350.2 (Representation), all 

parties, other than individuals, must be 

represented by an attorney. 

Further procedural matters, including 

scheduling, will be addressed after 

Petitions to Participate have been 

received. 

Dated: February 3, 2011. 

James Scott Sledge, 

Chief Copyright Royalty Judge. 

[FR Doc. 2011–2940 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1410–72–P 

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS 

ADMINISTRATION 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request 

AGENCY: National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: NARA is giving public notice 

that the agency has submitted to OMB 

for approval the information collections 

described in this notice. The public is 

invited to comment on the proposed 

information collections pursuant to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted to OMB at the address below 

on or before March 14, 2011 to be 

assured of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Mr. 

Nicholas A. Fraser, Desk Officer for 

NARA, Office of Management and 

Budget, New Executive Office Building, 

Washington, DC 20503; fax: 202–395– 

5167; or electronically mailed to 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

copies of the proposed information 

collections and supporting statements 

should be directed to Tamee Fechhelm 

at telephone number 301–713–1694 or 

fax number 301–713–7409. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(Pub. L. 104–13), NARA invites the 

general public and other Federal 

agencies to comment on proposed 

information collections. NARA 

published a notice of proposed 

collection for these information 

collections on November 24, 2010 (75 

FR 71743 and 71744). No comments 

were received. NARA has submitted the 

described information collections to 

OMB for approval. In response to this 

notice, comments and suggestions 

should address one or more of the 

following points: (a) Whether the 

proposed information collections are 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the functions of NARA; (b) the accuracy 

of NARA’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed information collections; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including the use of 

information technology; and (e) whether 

small businesses are affected by these 

collections. In this notice, NARA is 

soliciting comments concerning the 

following information collections: 

Title: Standard A-File. 

OMB number: 3095–00XX. 

Agency form numbers: NATF Form 

AFILE1. 

Type of review: Regular. 

Affected public: Individuals or 

households. 

Estimated number of respondents: 

480. 

Estimated time per response: 10 

minutes. 

Frequency of response: On occasion. 

Estimated total annual burden hours: 

80. 

Abstract: Submission of requests on a 

form is necessary to handle in a timely 

fashion the volume of requests received 

for these records and the need to obtain 

specific information from the researcher 

to search for the records sought. The 

records, called Alien Files, or A-Files, 

contain all records of any active case of 

an alien not yet naturalized as they 

passed through the United States 

immigration and inspection process. 

You can also use Order Online! (http:// 

www.archives.gov/research_room/

obtain_copies/military_and_

genealogy_order_forms.html) to 

complete the forms and order the 

copies. 

Dated: February 2, 2011. 

Charles K. Piercy, 

Acting Assistant Archivist for Information 

Services. 

[FR Doc. 2011–3045 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7515–01–P 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection, 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: National Science Foundation. 

ACTION: Notice. 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES