alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §102. Public policy in labor matters declared

In the interpretation of this chapter and in determining the jurisdiction and authority of the courts of the United States, as such jurisdiction and authority are defined and limited in this chapter, the public policy of the United States is declared as follows:

Whereas under prevailing economic conditions, developed with the aid of governmental authority for owners of property to organize in the corporate and other forms of ownership association, the individual unorganized worker is commonly helpless to exercise actual liberty of contract and to protect his freedom of labor, and thereby to obtain acceptable terms and conditions of employment, wherefore, though he should be free to decline to associate with his fellows, it is necessary that he have full freedom of association, self-organization, and designation of representatives of his own choosing, to negotiate the terms and conditions of his employment, and that he shall be free from the interference, restraint, or coercion of employers of labor, or their agents, in the designation of such representatives or in self-organization or in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection; therefore, the following definitions of, and limitations upon, the jurisdiction and authority of the courts of the United States are enacted.

(Mar. 23, 1932, ch. 90, §2, 47 Stat. 70.)
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of TransAlta Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dawn L. Farrell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
|    /s/   Dawn L. Farrell |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Dawn L. Farrell                         |   |
| President and Chief   Executive Officer |   |
|                                    |   |
| Dated:   February 18, 2016         |   |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
-cr-06216-LSS Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2000 P
Exhibit 32

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I,  Peter  J. Bergmann, the Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer of
YP  Corp.,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of YP
Corp. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 fully complies
with  the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934  and  that  information  contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
fairly  presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations  of  YP  Corp.

Date: September 23, 2004   /s/ Peter J. Bergmann
                           ------------------------
                           Peter J. Bergmann
                           Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


     I,  W.  Chris  Broquist,  the Chief Financial Officer of YP Corp., certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002, that the Annual Report of YP Corp. on Form 10-KSB
for  the  fiscal  year  ended  September  30,  2003  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and  that  information  contained  in  such  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly
presents  in  all  material  respects  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations  of  YP  Corp.

Date: September 23, 2004   /s/ W. Chris Broquist
                           ------------------------
                           W. Chris Broquist
                           Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-44 May 7, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE ON APPARENT VIOLATIONS OF NRC

FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS AT BRAIDWOOD PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet May 14 with

representatives of Commonwealth Edison Co. for a predecisional enforcement

conference on apparent violations of NRC fire protection requirements at the

Braidwood Nuclear Power Station. The plant is at Braidwood, Illinois.

The meeting will be at 1 p.m. in the Third Floor Conference Room of the

NRC Region III Office, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois. It will be open

to public observation.

The enforcement conference will review apparent fire protection

violations at the Braidwood Station. The violations were initially identified

by the utility in mid-1996. They included roll-up doors which did not meet

the specified three-hour rating as fire doors and several instances of

inadequate separation of electrical cables in parallel portions of safety

systems.

These violations were covered in an NRC fire protection inspection which

was conducted from October 3 of last year through January 30.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean the NRC has

determined that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be

taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes

and safety significance; to provide the utility an opportunity to point out

any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable

the company to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decisions on apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement

action, such as a fine, will be made at this conference. Those decisions will

be made by senior NRC officials at a later date.

####
#### Jacob Thull v. Harry Allen.

Filed December 7, 1904.

No. 13,660.

Evidence examined, and *held*sufficient to sustain the judgment of the district court.

Error to the district court for Cedar county: Guy T. Graves, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Millard & Snider,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. Ready, contra.*

Oldham, C.

This was an action in forcible entry and detainer. Plaintiff had judgment of restitution in the court below, and defendant brings error to this court.

The first question called to our attention in the brief of plaintiff in error is that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the judgment. It appears from the testimony in the bill of exceptions that defendant had leased the premises in dispute, in writing, for a period of one year from the first day of April, 1901, with the privilege of remaining another year if the premises were not sold. It appears that defendant had availed himself of this privilege and remained on the premises until the first day of April, 1903. On the 15th day of April plaintiff served notice, in writing, on defendant to surrender possession of the premises. This notice is offered in evidence, as well as the lease, and it was admitted in open court that plaintiff was the owner of the premises, and that defendant was in possession at and after the beginning of the suit. We think this evidence sufficient to sustain the judgment of the trial court. The presumption that defendant was holding by permission of the landlord after the expiration of the lease was fully overcome by the proof of the service of the notice to quit on the defendant. The evidence *761showed that plaintiff prosecuted his suit diligently after the service of the notice, and there was nothing to indicate an acquiescence in defendant’s wrongfully holding over.

It is further contended in the brief of plaintiff in error that the judgment of the district court is contrary to law, because the evidence shows that plaintiff had waived the breach of the lease by commencing a suit against the defendant for rent after instituting his suit of unlawful detainer. It appears from the record that the defendant in the court below laid the foundation to introduce the record of a subsequent suit for rent instituted by plaintiff against the defendant in the county court of Cedar county, but, after laying the foundation for this proof, the defendant neglected to offer the record of this proceeding, and counsel for plaintiff and defendant now dispute as to whether the suit for rent in the county court was for rent that accrued before or after the forfeiture. Without the record we are unable to determine this contention. These are the only two objections we have been asked to examine, and we therefore recommend that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

Ames and Letton, CC., concur.

By the Court:

For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.17


SEPARATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT




Company MAR Iannini Effective Date




Background




Consulting Agreement MAR




Common Stock Original Stock Restricted Stock










Agreement




NOW THEREFORE IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS




Resignation and Termination; Waivers




Resignation and Termination




Waiver of Severance







Waiver of Reinstatement




Payments Released Parties Payments Reimbursement Expense Section 6(a) Section 5(a)




Retention of Original Stock




Forfeiture of Restricted Stock


2




Releases




MAR and Iannini Releases




The Company Release




Covenants Covenants Section 8


3




Transition, Consultation and Cooperation Payment Period Consultation Obligation




Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Confidential Information provided


4




Return of Company Property and Information




Public or Private Statements




Communication with Certain Parties provided however




Bad Faith Acts




g. Non-Competition Section 6(a)


5




Non-Solicitation




Non-Solicitation of Customers.




(ii) Non-Solicitation of Employees and Independent Contractors.




Reasonableness of Restrictions and Provision for Reduction Section 5




Further Assurances and Cooperation


6


Representations and Warranties




No Knowledge of Fraud and Certification of Filings April and May Financials




Review of Agreement




Independent Advice




Understanding of Terms




Voluntary Act




Termination Section 5 Section 6 Section 7




Arbitration provided Section 6


7




Governing Law




Severability




Headings




Notices




If to MAR orIannini:
David J. Ianniniphone: ( )fax: ( )e-mail:If to Company:
Chief Executive OfficerYP Corp.4840 East Jasmine Street, Suite 105Mesa, Arizona 85205-3321Fax: (480) 860-0800


8




Attorneys Fees




Intent to be Binding




Entire Agreement




Injunctive Relief Damages and Forfeiture Section 6 Section 6




No Admission Clause






REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]





9












**CAUTION! THIS IS A RELEASE! READ BEFORE SIGNING!**


/s/ David Iannini
David Iannini
**MAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.**, an
Arizona corporation

/s/ David Iannini
By: David Iannini
Its: President
**YP CORP.**, a Nevada corporation


/s/ Peter Bergmann
By: Peter Bergmann
Its: President





Re-Execution:





Section 5(a)





Re-Execution Date:David Iannini























[SIGNATURE PAGE TO SEPARATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT]


10
[EXHIBIT 31.1]

           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Paul Kravitz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Med Gen, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the
registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: December 29, 2007

By: /s/Paul Kravitz
   ----------------------------
   Paul Kravitz
   Chief Executive Officer
(No. 1100

Claimant awarded $500.00.)

#### Peter W. Kehlenbach, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March*29, 1927.

Governmental *function*— when *State not liable.*The State in conducting its State penitentiary at Statesville, exercises a governmental function and is not liable for injuries sustained by its employees therein while in the discharge of their duty.

Social justice and *equity*— award *may be made.*An award may be made to an employee who is injured while in the employment of the State, and in the discharge of his duty, as a matter of social justice and equity.

Lagger & Blatt, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Roy D. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant in this case, Peter W. Kehlenbach, sets out in his declaration that he is and has been for a number of years last past, a resident citizen of the county of Will and State of Illinois; that on January 19, 1926, and for some time prior thereto, he was employed as a guard or keeper at the Illinois State Penitentiary at Statesville, and on said day was keeper of one of the cell houses at said penitentiary; that on said day and date a convict known as No. 8836 Coughington, confined *320in the south cell house, suddenly and without warning attacked one J. B. Babcock, a guard in said cell house; that claimant went to the assistance of said J. B. Babcock, and he was then attacked by said Coughington and beaten about the body with a cane which the convict had seized, and cut about the body with a knife which the convict held, inflicting, among other' injuries, a cut in his abdomen, about seven inches long, and a cut on the throat; that he was otherwise beaten, bruised and injured by the convict and as a result thereof he was seriously and permanently injured. To the declaration, the State of Illinois, by the Attorney General, filed a demurrer, which, as a matter of law, is sustained.

It appears from the testimony of Dr. Fletcher, State physician, who had the care of the claimant, that he is not permanently disabled, and that his injuries are entirely cured. He is working as guard at the penitentiary again, and there is nothing to indicate that he does not receive the same remuneration as he did prior to his injury. However, claimant testifies that he is not able to do any heavy lifting, on account of the injury to his abdomen, and that it has become, necessary for him to wear glasses, on account of injury sustained to his left eye; that he was a machinist prior to entering into the service of the State of Illinois, and that it would be impossible now for him to do the work he was formerly accustomed to perform. While we do not concede any legal liability on the part of the State of Illinois, we feel that, as a matter of social justice and equity, this claimant who was unjustifiably attacked while performing his duties, and as a result thereof sustained serious, probably permanent, injuries, is entitled to some compensation, and we award him the sum of $500.00.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22794]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employees Benefits Security Administration


Working Group on Plan Fees and Reporting on Form 5500, Advisory 
Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefits Plans; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a 
public teleconference meeting will be held on Thursday, October 28, 
2004, of the Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit 
Plans Working Group assigned to study plan fees as reported on the Form 
5500.
    The session will take place in Room S4215-C, U.S. Department of 
Labor Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. The 
purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 1 p.m. to 
approximately 4 p.m., is for Working Group members to discuss and 
conclude their report/recommendations for the Secretary of Labor.
    Organizations or members of the public wishing to submit a written 
statement pertaining to the topic may do so by submitting 20 copies to 
Larry Good, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. 
Department of Labor, Room N-5656, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20210. Statement received on or before October 20, 2004 
will be included in the record of the meeting. Individuals or 
representatives of organizations wishing to address the Work Group 
should forward their request to the Executive Secretary at the above 
address or via telephone at (202) 693-8668. Oral presentations will be 
limited to 20 minutes, but an extended statement may be submitted for 
the record. Individuals with disabilities who need special 
accommodations should contact Larry Good by October 20 at the address 
indicated in this notice.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 5th day of October, 2004.
Ann L. Combs,
Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-22794 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
### §1349. Corporation organized under federal law as party

The district courts shall not have jurisdiction of any civil action by or against any corporation upon the ground that it was incorporated by or under an Act of Congress, unless the United States is the owner of more than one-half of its capital stock.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §42 (Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, §12, 43 Stat. 941).

Words "civil action" were substituted for "action or suit," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.
#### Edward Donohue, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The County of Essex and Another, Defendants, Impleaded with John Anderson and Another, etc., Copartners, etc., Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. So opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**





**18
      U.S.C. §1350,**





**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Diametrics Medical, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB/A Amendment No. 2 for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Heng Chuk, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Heng ChukHeng
                Chuk
              
              Chief
                Financial OfficerJune
                7, 2007




A
      signed
      original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.