# Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Determination of Total Filterable Particulate Matter, Hydrochloric Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid and Visible Emissions Bickley Kiln (Source ID: 102) and Harrop Kiln

(Source ID: 101) EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, and 26A Glen-Gery Cornoration Mid Atlantic Plant

Shoemakersville, Pennsylvania Date Conducted: October 10 and 11, 2007 Job Number: 071008



## Prepared by: 

# Air Compliance 

# ~

Testing, Inc. PO Box 41156 Cleveland OH 44141-0156 Phone: (800) EPA-AIR1 (372-2471) 

### Report Date: November 7, 2007

## SuperiorQuality 

# Air Compliance

Emission Testing. 

## p, — (1 „ n n x Valid 

## Results 

# "P Ukd 11; " 'I Testing, Inc. Guaranteed. P.O. Box 41166 Cleveland, Ohio 44141 1-800-EPA-AIR1 www.aircomp.com

testing@aircomp.com 

## November 7, 2007 Jerry Carrier Director of Research/Development Glen-Gery Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant 433 South Pottsville Pike Shoemakersville, Pennsylvania 19555 Dear Jerry: The following report provides the results of the compliance emission testing conducted on October 10 and 11, 2007. These results are a product of the application of the U.S. EPA Stationary Source Sampling Methods listed in 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A that were in effect 

## at the time of this test. Please mail one copy of this report along with any other supportive process operating data collected during this test to your local EPA representative. You should also attach a cover letter (on company letterhead) stating the purpose and the outcome of this test. Additionally, you may address, preferably in a timetable format, any obligations or implications that might be necessary to achieve environmental compliance because of the result of this test. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or concerns about these test results. On behalf of Air Compliance Testing, I would also like to personally thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this testing project and would enjoy the opportunity to work with you again on any additional future testing projects. Sincerely, 

# l ~ Phaneendra Uppalapati Air Qual' Engineer v Robert J. Lisy, Quality Assurance Officer

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant 

# Table of Contents Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Summary of Test Program 2 1.2 Key Personnel 2 2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 3 2.1 Objectives and Test Matrix 3 2.2 Field Test Changes and Problems 4 2.3 Presentation of Results 4 3.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS 10 3.1 Process Description and Operation 10 3.2 Control Equipment Description 10 3.3 Flue Gas Sampling Locations 10 3.4 Process Sampling Location 11 4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 18 4.1 Test Methods 18 4.2 Procedures for Obtaining Process Data 19 5.0 INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES 22 5.1 QA Audits 22 5.2 QA/QC Problems 22 6.0 APPENDIX 27

Test Date: October 10 and 11, 2007 Page 1 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 071008

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

### Glen-Gerv Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant 

# 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Summary of Test Program Glen-Gery Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant, located in Shoemakersville, Pennsylvania contracted Air Compliance Testing, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio to conduct compliance stack emission testing for their Bickley Kiln (Source ID: 102) and Harrop Kiln (Source ID: 101). Testing was performed to satisfy the emission testing requirements pursuant to Operating Permit No. 06-05065B. The testing was performed on October 10 and 11, 2007. Simultaneous sampling was performed at the Bickley Kiln Dry Limestone Adsorber (DLA) Inlet Duct and at the Biekley Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack to determine the mass emission rate of hydrochloric aeid (HCI) and liydrofluoric acid (HF). Sampling was also performed at the Bickley Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack to determine the mass emission rate of total filterable particulate matter (PM). Testing was conducted while operating at a maximum production level for the products listed in the appendix. During this test, emissions from the Bicldey Kiln was controlled by a DLA. Simultaneous sampling was performed at the Harrop Kiln DLA Inlet Duct and at the Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack to determine the mass emission rate of HCI and HF. Sampling was also perforined at the Harrop DLA Exhaust Stack to determine the mass emission rate of total filterable PM. Testing was conducted while operating at a maximum production level for the products listed in the appendix. During this test, emissions from Harrop Kiln were controlled by a DLA. Visible Emissions (VEs) measured as percent opacity were also monitored at the Bickley Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack and at the Harrop Kihi DLA Exhaust Stack to determine the maximum six-minute average of opacity. The test methods that were conducted during this test were EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, and 26A. 1.2 Key Personnel The key personne) who coordinated this test program (and their phone numbers) were: Jerry Carrier, Director of Research/Development, Glen-Gery Corporation, 610-374-4011 Roger Fitterling, Air Quality Program, Pennsylvania Dept of Environmental Protection, 610-916-0100 Philip J. Billick, President, Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 800-372-2471 Sin I-Ioi Chiew, Project Manager, Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 800-372-2471

Test Date: October 10 and 11, 2007 aage 2 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

## - 071008Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant



## 2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 2.1 Objectives 

## and Test 

## Matrix The purpose of this test was to determine the mass emission rate of HCI and I-TF at the Bickley Kiln DLA Inlet Duct, Bickley ICiln DLA Exhaust Stack, Harrop Kiln DLA Inlet Duct, and at the Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack and also determine the mass emission rate of total filterable PM at the Bickley Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack and at the Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the products listed in the Appendix at a predetermined limestone extraction setting. VEs (measured ae %-opacity) were also determined at the Bickley Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack and at the Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the products listed in the Appendix at a predetermined limestone extraction setting. Testing was performed to satisfy the emission testing requirements pursuant to Operating Permit No. 06-05065B. The specific test ob,jectives for this test were to: Measure the concentration of HCI and HF at the Bickley Kiln DLA Inlet Duct and at the Bickley Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack and also measure the concentration of total tilterable PM at the Biekley Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack while operating at a maximum production level for the products listed in the Appendix at a predetermined limestone extraction setting. Measure the dry standard and actual volumetric flow rate of the stack gas at the Bickley Kiln DLA Inlet Duct and at the Bickley Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack while operating at a maximum production level for the products listed in the Appendix at a predetermined limestone extraction setting. Utilize the above variables to determine the mass emission rate of HCl and HF at the Bickley Kiln DLA Inlet Duct and at the Bickley ICiln DLA Exhaust Stack and also determine the mass emission rate of total filterable PM at the Bickley Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack while operating at a maximum production level for the products listed in the Appendix at a predetermined limestone extraction setCing. Measure the concentration of HCI and HF at the Harrop Kiln DLA Inlet Duct and at the Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack and also measure the concentration of total filterable PM at the Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack while operating at a maximum production level for the products listed in the Appendix at a predetermined limestone extraction setting. Measure the diy standard and actual volumetric flow rate of the stack gas at the Harrop Kiln DLA Inlet Duct, and at the Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack while operating at a maximum production level for the products listed in the Appendix at a predetennined limestone extraction setting. Utilize the above variables to determine the mass emission rate of HCl and HF at the Harrop Kiln DLA Inlet Duct and at the Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack and also detennine the mass emission rate of total filterable PM at the Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack while operating at a maximum production level for the products listed in the Appendix at a predetermined limestone extraction setting.

Test Date: October 10 and 11, 2007 Page 3 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 071008

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant



## Determine the maxiinum six-minute average of opacity at the Bickley Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack and at the Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the products listed in the Appendix at a predetermined limestone extraetion setting. Table 2.1 presents the sampling and analytical matrix log for this test. 2.2 Field Test Changes and Problems No field test changes or problems occurred during the performance of this test that would bias the accuracy of the results of this test. 2.3 Presentation of Resu/ts A single sampling train was utilized during each run at each location to determine the mass emission rate of HCl and HF at the Bickley Kiln DLA Inlet Duct, Bickley Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack, Harrop Kiln DLA Inlet Duet, and at the Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack and also deterrnine the mass emission rate of total filterable PM at the Bickley Kihi DLA Exhaust Stack and at the Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the products listed in the Appendix at a predetermined limestone extraction setting. These sampling trains measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and concentrations of HCI, HF, and total filterable PM. Table 2.2.1 displays the mass emission rate of HCI and HF measured at the Bickley Kiln DLA Inlet Duct and the mass emission rate of I-ICI, HF, and total filterable PM measured at the Bickley Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack while operating at a maximum production level for the products listed in the Appendix at a predetermined limestone extraction setting. Table 2.2.1 also displays the maxiinum 6-minute average of opacity measured at the Bickley Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack while operating at a maximum production level for the products listed in the Appendix at a predetermined limestone extraction setting. As displayed in Table 2.2.1, the HCI emissions from Bickley Kiln were measured to be slightly higher at the DLA outlet than at the DLA inlet. (Note that this phenomenon also occurred during prior DLA testing, including the testing completed at the Marseilles Plant during the November 2006 test event at P001.) At the time of this report, the reason for this occurrence is unknown but may simply be attributed to the inherent errors of the sampling methods and/or the potential presence of non-target compounds in the gas streams that may have produced HCI upon disassociation at elevated stack gas temperatures. As with previous instances, Air Compliance Testing, Inc. perforined a review of the sampling equipment, field data recorded during the test runs, and analytical laboratory data to verify the HCI results. After a thorough review of the available data, it is the opinion of Air Complacence Testing, Inc. that the HCI results displayed in Table 2.2.1 are reported correctly. Note that all HCl levels were well below permitted limits.

Test Date: October 10 and 11, 2007 Page 4 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 071008

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant



## Table 2.2.2 displays the mass emission rate of HCI and HF measured at the Harrop Kiln DLA Inlet Duct and the mass emission rate of HCI, HF, and total filterable PM measured at the Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack while operating at a maxiinum produetion level for the products listed in the Appendix at a predetermined limestone extraction setting. Table 2.2.2 also displays the maximum 6-minute average of opacity measured at the Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack while operating at a maximum production level for the products listed in the Appendix at a predetermined limestone extraction setting.

Test Date: October 10 and 11, 2007 Page 5 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 071008T 

# m a Vt Q

In



### ~ Q

h a l U E ~


# x

~ ~ A W

~ 5 o



### p rn

~ rn o rn ~ o rn rn rn ~ o rn 

### O d N O M N ~ O



## Vi Q U U U


# A A A a a a C 

### C C C A A A C 

## C G C N N N

q O O O O O O 

### O O O O O O ~ O O 

## 0

~ 

### C y

~ 

## N U N Q O U Q



### ti L~+

~ 

## U

~ 

### CC

~ 

### 'O
~ .~ 

### bA ~ .~ 

# E
~ ~ 1 ti 

## N d .LZ 

## h

~


### E - a 

### ~ ro O T 

### C] N W ~ `A ro E ~ 

## N Q

~ 

## -~ t ~ 

### C b ➢ C O 00 ~ 00 ~ O ~ oo ~ 00

~ 

### A



## y A A 

### W 

# _
~ C 

# H ~ _

N

.~ 

### O

W

~ 

### vi C

~~ 

### '
~ A

~ 

### N

~ A


# a a a a W W W C 

## Q Ca q a a a

x x x d



### A O 

### O O o 0 0 ~ 

### O 

# 0

~ 

## .C
. 

# G N F~ 

# u ro C 0 U 4



# ~ ~ ~ 

### ~ 

## V

~ ~
~ 

### "O G ~ ~ G 

### O, ~ ~ 

## i rl 

## N

~ ~ ~ 

## H

O N ti ~ a H ~ ~ o 

# q s ~ 

# o U
~ O 

### v N

~ 

### u N F 

### Q 

## rn



# a

### Y C1 N Y W C O .-

. ~ 

### W ti 

### N 

## N

..~.~ ~ 

# F N N 

## a ~ 

# _ _ o

~

a

V

~ o

C A rn

Q C
Y N
~i ~ ~ M N vi M O N rn

~ Nj V

l •-- ~ ~ Y V ~ 

# Ga a 

# ,
N o:



## h o

p ~



### w 

## ❑

w °

x ~ 

## y °-

x ~ a

U i 

## v

C 

## > > v Q

~ } j~ v~ i 

## > o `

~ 

## C7

p .^n

x

4 .~ N.

~ 

## Y

f V J


# o a H ~ 0 

### O O C L1"I 

### [ N F

~ 

### . U G .N 4 

### O V K



### O N C 

### O d

~ O ~ m ~ ~ m F-~ 0 0 0 

### C ~ G y F N U C 

### m c O 

## U Q U C Q p y h ~ y N 

# a
O L lC N

O t ~ a

~ O yj O M T O O M ~ n M M oMo
C Q N

~ M M Vl N 00 

# a ~ G u 7 rYr N O N v ~ h o0 v M i N O

~ i M 00 h ~ N
~ p O O

~ 

## R v 

## x N

~ ro 

### ~

t y



# M c A tl 

### N

0 N

0 NI ~ Fi' 

### o


# a y



### c Y i d 

### ~

i

N .O T

w ~ ~ o n, H ~ e ~ C4 

### q O


## . N .~ W N 

### N 

### N ~ 

### A H rn 

## a

O N C 0 `v

~ O 

## v m O N N H

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant 

## 3.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS 3.1 

## Process Description and Operation The Glen-Geiy Mid-Atlantic Facility operates two natural gas-fired tunnel kilns. The kilns produce brick of various sizes and colors. Each kiln is equipped with identical dry limestone absorber (DLA) systems manufactured by Hellmich to control Hydrogen Fluoride and Hydrogen Chloride emissions. The Bickley Kiln and Harrop Kiln were in operation during the performance of this test. Figures 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 depict the process schematics. 3.2 Control Equipment Description During this test, emissions from the Bickley Kiln and Harrop Kiln were each controlled by individual DLAs and the bypass damper for each DLA was closed during this test event. Bach DLA system is comprised of a single limestone cascade absorber equipped with a limestone silo atop the DLA, and an extraction system to provide crushed limestone to the cascade absorber tower. Exhaust gases from the kilns are passed through each absorber perpendicular to the crushed limestone that is slowly extracted from the base of the absorbers. Each limestone cascade absorber tower is equipped with a peeling drum at the base which mechanically removes the reacted outer layer of the crushed limestone. The "peeled" limestone is pneumatically conveyed from the peeling drum back to the limestone feed bins for re-use. The reacted layer that has been "peeled" from the limestone is discharged via gravity to hoppers for disposal. Both DLAs utilize the same grade of limestone obtained from the same source. A block flow diagram depicting one of the two kilns and DLA arrangements is attached. Althougli both kilns are not identical, the general eqaipment arrangements are identical for both kiln systems. 

## 3.3 Flue 

## Gas Sampling Locations 

## 3.3.1 Bieklev Kiln DLA Inlet Duct The Bickley Kiln DLA Inlet Duct was elliptical in shape with ineasured inner diameters of 49.5-inches and 49.9-inches. The duct was oriented in the horizontal plane and was accessed from a temporary scaffolding arrangeinent. Two (2) 3.5-inch I.D. sampling ports were located 90 1 apart from one another at a location that met EPA Method l, Section 11.1.1 criteria. On April 25, 2007 the duct was traversed to verify the absence of cyclonic flow. An average yaw angle of 7.75° was measured. Therefore, the sampling location also met EPA Method 1, Section 11.4.2 criteria. During emissions sampling, the duct was traversed for stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and HCI and HF concentration determination.

Test Date: October 10 and 11, 2007 Page 10 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

### - 071008

## Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant



## 3.3 2 Bickley Kiln 

## DLA Exhaust Stack The BicMey Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack was elliptical in shape with measured inner diameters of 47.1-inches and 47.0-inches. The stack was oriented in the vertical plane and was accessed from a permanent platform. Two (2) 3.7-inch I.D. sampling ports were located 90° apart from one another at a location that met EPA Method 1, Section 11.1.1 criteria. On April 25, 2007 the stack was traversed to verify the absence of cyclonic flow. An average yaw angle of 4.75° was ineasured. Therefore, the sampling location also met EPA Method 1, Section 11.4.2 criteria. During emissions sampling, the stack was traversed for stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and total filterable PM, HCI, and HF concentration determination. 3.3.3 Harrop Kiln DLA Inlet Duct The Harrop Kiln DLA Inlet Duct was elliptical in shape with measured inner diameters of 48.5-inches and 50.2-inches. The duct was oriented in the horizontal plane and was accessed from ground. Two (2) 3.5-inch LD, sampling ports were located 90° apart from one another at a location that met EPA Method 1, Section 1 1.1.1 criteria. On April 26, 2007 the duct was traveraed to verify the absence of cyclonic flow. An average yaw angle of 6.13° was measured. Therefore, the sampling location also met EPA Method 1, Section 11.4.2 criteria. During emissions sampling, the duct was traversed for stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and HCI and HF concentration determination. 3 3.4 Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack The Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack was elliptical in shape with measured inner diameters of 47.1-inclies and 47.2-inches. The stack was oriented in the vertical plane and was accessed from a permanent platform. Two (2) 3.8-inch I.D. sampling ports were located 90° apart from one another at a location that met EPA Method 1, Section 11.1.1 criteria. On April 26, 2007 the stack was traversed to verify the absence of cyclonic flow. An average yaw angle of 2.42° was measured. Therefore, the sampling location also met EPA Method 1, Section 11.4.2 criteria. During emissions sampling, the stack was traversed for stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and total filterable PM, HCI, and HF concentration determination. Figures 3.2.1 - 3.2.4 schematically illustrate the traverse point and sample port locations utilized. 3.4 Process 

## Sampling Location Process sampling was completed by Glen-Gery as part of their QA/QC program and included raw material sampling at the pug mill as well as Fire Check ICey testing in the kiln. In addition, '/z brick was removed froin cars after the drier/prior to kiln entry as well as at kiln exit for purposes of mass balance testing if results of the stack test did not indicate compliance. Results from the QA/QC testing were unavailable at the time of this report.

Test Date: October 10 and 11, 2007 Page 11 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 071008

## I N c 

## F Z 

### m a ajaydsowyy <-- ~ 0 0 h O l)
~ ~7 G 

### H ti d U 

### G 

### m

. Q 

## E 0 

### U ~ Q'
N C N 0 U L N 0 Q ~ a.

~ i ° W

~ j N

N



## N ° m a E o 

# mpU

N
~ A ~ N 

### Z Q ~ a

~ i i

~ i

--- '

i i i i i i i i i c

~ U
W V R
~ ~ N I I I I I I I N 

# C U O 3 N ~ E E J ~ 

## LL ~ o ~ U N ~ N ~ 

### W w 3 U 

### V1 

### a~ y u 0 

### r. C~
~ 

# I 

# °

z C

~ ~ u ~
~ ti M

~ . 

### Lzi
U m N LL n O 

## N V C @ O 

## N fl O U 0 

## N N O w
~ Hajaqdsoway <— a N N > c~ ~ 0 0

~ . 0 V C

~ C S:. N F~ d V G ~ 

### o. 

## E 0 U

~ Q

y 

## N O m C ~ 

### _O ~ ~ m 

### LLMa W

~ i N 

# a
i



# i i i I J—. i i

~ I I 

# ~ I I I I i i i c I - i

i ~ I ~ I i i

~ 

### Y N C U V d ~ ~ m N ~ ~~ 

### J 2 N ° (

~ /1 

# mpU

N N Z V

c 0 3 

# ~ Tl " N N ~ ~

~



### ~ 1



### ~ 

# z p 

## ~ 

# a L L 

# ~ ~ N 

# ti M bA LL



### ~ 

## m 

# d ii. M m a

O O 

# N O N d O U 0 N N ~ N N hPort 2

Port 1


# I

~ -- 49.5" LD. 

# ~ Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant

(2) 3.5"

. Sampiing Ports Located 90° Apart

. . 122.6" l 211.0" 2.44 Equivalent 4.23 Equivalent



# ~ Diameters Downstream

- 

# ~ Diameters Upstream 

# ~

From Disturbance From Disturbance ' 49.5" x 49.9" I. D. -._..

Elliptical Stack -~ O 

### _

Distance From Distance From Point % of Duct Depth Inside WaII (in.) Inside Wall (in.) Port1 Port 2 1 2.1 1.0 1.0

~ . 2 6.7 3.3 3.$ 3 11.8 5.8 

### 5.9 4 17.7 8.8 8.8 5 25.0 12.4 12.5 6 35.6 17.6 17.8 7 64.4 31.9 32.1 8 75.0 37.1 

### 37.4 9 82.3 40.7 41.1 10 88.2 437 44.0 11 93.3 46.2 46.6 12 ~ 97.9 48.5 48.9



## Figure 3.2.1 - Bickley Kiln DLA Inlet Duct Traverse Point Location Drawing

Test Date: October 10 and 11, 2007 Page 14 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 071008Port 1 

# r -47.1" LD.--------- I

6 

### 0 h a 

### ComDliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant



# m 110.0" 2.34 Equivalent Diameters Upstream from Disturbance

(2) 3.7" I.D.

~ 

### --- Sampling Ports

Located 90°Apart

Port 2 

### 663.0" 14.08 Equivalent Diameters Downstream from Disturbance



# ~ _47.1" x 47.0" I. D.

Elliptical Stack Distance From Distance From Point % of Duct Depth Inside Wall (in.) Inside Wall (in.) Port 1 Port 2 1 4.4 2.1 2.1 2 14.6 6.9 6.9 3 29.6 119 13.9 4 70.4 33.2 33.1 5 85.4 40.2 40.1 6 95.6 45.0 44.9



## Figure 3.2.2 - Bickley Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Location Drawing

Test Date: October 10 and 11, 2007 Page 15 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 071008Port 2

Mnil 

# I ~ 48.5" LD. 

# -~ Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant

126.0" 

# ~ 2.51 Equivalent

Diameters Downstream From Disturbance 48.5" x 50.2" LD. Eliipticai Stack (2) 3.5" Sampling Ports Located 90° Apart 186.0" 

# ~ 3.71 Equivalent

Diameters upstream 

# ~ From Disturbance



# ~

Distance From Distance From inside WaII (in.) Inside Wall (in.) Point % of Duct Depth Port 1 Port 2 

### 1 2.1 1.0 

## 1.1 2 6.7 3.2 3.4 3 11.8 5.7 5.9 4 17.7 8.6 8.9 5 25.0 12.1 12.6 6 35.6 17.3 17.9 7 64.4 31.2 32.3 8 75.0 36.4 37.7 9 823 39.9 ` 41.3 10 88.2 4 2.8 44.3 11 

## -_ 933 45.3 46.8 12 97.9
. . . . . 47.5

... 49.1 .....


## Figure 3.2.3 - Harrop Kiln DLA Inlet Duct Traverse Point Location Drawing

Test Date: October 10 and 11, 2007 Page 16 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 071008

# ~ 47.1" LD. j

Port 1

Port 2 Distance From Distance From Point % of Duct Depth Inside Wall (in.) Inside Wall (in.) Port 1 Port 2 

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant

96.0" 2.03 Equivalent Diameters Upstream from Disturbance

(2) 3.8" LD. Q - ~ Sampling Ports Located 90°Apart

660" 13.98 Equivalent Diameters Downstream from Disturbance I

_47.1 " x 47.2" I. D. Elliptical Stack 1 4.4 21 2.1 2 14.6 6.9 6.9 3 29.6 13.9 14.0 4 70.4 33.2 33.2 5 85.4 40.2 40.3 6 95.6 45.0 45,1



## Figure 3.2.4 - Harrop Kiln DLA Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Location Drawing

Test Date: October 10 and 11, 2007 Page 17 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 071008

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Repo t Glen-Gerv Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant 

# 4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 4.1 Test Methods 4.1.1 EPA Method 1: Sainple and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Source Principle: To aid in the representative measurement of pollutant emissions and/or total volumetric flow rate from a stationary source, a measurement site where the effluent stream is flowing in a known direction is selected, and the cross-section of the stack is divided into a number of equal areas. A traverse point is then located within each of these equal areas. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the proeedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.2 EPA Method 2: Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S) Principle: The average gas velocity in a stack is determined from the gas density and from measurement of the average velocity head with a Type S(Stausscheibe or reverse type) pitot tube. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.3 EPA Method 3: Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight Principle: A gas sample is extracted from a stack by one of the following methods: (1) single-point, grab sampling; (2) single-point, integrated sampling; or (3) inulti-point, integrated sainpling. The gas sample is analyzed for percent CO Z

, 

## percent 0 2 , and if necessary, for percent CO. For dry molecular weight determination a Fyrite analyzer will be used for the analysis. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.4 EPA Method 4: Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases Principle: A gas sample is extracted at a constant rate from the source; moisture is removed from the sample stream and determined either volumetrically or gravimetrically. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.5 EPA Method 5: Determination of Particulate Emissions frorn Stationary Sources (Filterable PM only) Principle: Particulate matter (PM) is withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected on a glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature in the range of 120 t 14°C (248 t 25°F) or such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, for a particular application. The PM mass, which includes any material that condenses at or above the filtration temperature, is determined gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.6 EPA Method 9: Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions from Stationary Sources Principle: The opacity of emissions from stationary sources is deterinined visually by a qualified observer. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A.

Test Date: October 10 and 11, 2007 

## Page 18 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

## - 071008

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant



## 4.1.7 EPA Method 26A: Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions from Stationary SourcesIsokinetic Method Principle: This method is applicable for detennining emissions of hydrogen halides (HX) [hydrogen chloride (HCI), hydrogen bromide (HBr), and hydrogen fluoride (HF)] and halogens (X2) [chlorine (C12) and bromine (Br Z )] from stationary sources. This method collects the emission sample isokinetically and is therefore particularly suited for sampling at sources, sucli as those controlled by wet scrubbers, emitting acid particulate matter (e.g., hydrogen halides dissolved in water droplets). This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. The sampling trains utilized during this testing project are depicted in Figures 4.1 and 4.2. 4.2 Procedures for Obtaining Process Data 

## Process data was recorded by Glen-Gery Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant personnel utilizing their typical record keeping procedures. Recorded process data was provided to Air Compliance Testing, Inc. personnel at the conclusion of this test event. The process data is located in the Appendix and included the following. Glen-Gery personnel recorded the following process data during the performance test: ICiln Tl7roughput (Tons fired brick/hour) Type of Brick in Kiln during testing Bypass Damper Position Limestone extraction setting Source and Grade of Limestone

Test Date: October 10 and 11, 2007 Page 19 Air 

### Compliance Testing, Ine. 

## - 071008F- a LU ~



## ~ 

## p Sa ui 

# D > w~

~ zcn ~~ Qa QU 

## O > W

~ I a ~ O U O ~ Z O 

### F ~

~ 

### W z_ J ¢~ O

~ 

### F cr O 

## W (D 

## m
~ 

### Z O 

## n. U 2 ¢ of 

# = W J LU



### 2i 0- O

2 

### U O cr W W 

## ~ ~ ~

~ 

### W Q W S ~ 0 0
~ 0 

### t>

~ 

# c d E. 

# u m 

## .~ 

# U :. 

# c 

# J = a ~

~ 

## .0

~ 

## q .~ s. 

### H bA 

### q 

# a Y q ~ ~ N



### rn

~ 

# N a O O } S7 0 ~

~ ~ ~ 

## W ~ ti 7 i~
. q 

## W

S H r 0 0 N

~ G N O N 

# ~ 0 U 0

~ ~ O
~ ~ N 

### n. 

# U) H 

# 3 W m 0 0 ~ a

# m

• ~

1



### WO 

### U)r 

# Wam

~ 

### wa 

# W. 0 

# ~ li

2 

### D w 

# D > w 

# J a 

### ~ 

# w O > U J 

## ~ O ~ U r Z J w 

### r



# ~ O 

## O 

## ~ 

# m cc: Z x O 

### ~ 

## Q \\~ 

# x F w ~ J 

### a U 

### O Y



### cc:w 

### 0 J ~ 

### cr LL ~ w w v 

## y 

## z F U a~~ Q m Q Q 

# ~ CD > 

## d^

~ M ~ a ~ 

# _ ~ N

a 

# ~ ~ W J~

~ 

### _ n °-' °- O

_ E°o c O ~ E ~~ 

### C-)- 9 LLI R _S 

### o 

### Zp ~ ar O 

# = ~



### - 

### o EzOa..

a W

~~ S y LL



### O


# ~ w 

## N 6 

# w W r O W ~ ~O 

### z Q ~ 

### Lu 

## :3 a r 

## e 

# w -' ° x U 

# ' a' y > r ~ 

# d Q 

### > W Z(n fL D U

~ Q ~ O Q Q 

### > ro 

### ~ 

# U

¢

~ M

~
~ .~ 

# V C4f) C 

# a p
.~ 

## K ~ w W ~ ~ ~ ~ m 

## < N a U` O o ~ 

# ~ 

# , W

, N 

## K 7 W d W = Q w ~ 

# s

N 

# 9 G W O N 

# s 0 O
~ 

### m 0 N N 

# r 

# I

0 (t) W p


### x O J d Y J 

## UJ Q Q 

## J `

~ 

## 1 d ` 

### O U 

### O 

## w~C S 

# r d 

# J m C7 O Er a

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-GerV Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant 

## 5.0 INTERNAL C,tA/QC ACTIVITIES 5.1 QA Audits Tables 5.1.1 - 5.3 illustrate the QA audit activities that were performed during this test. All meter boxes and sampling trains used during sainpling performed within the requirements of their respective methods as is shown in Tables 5.1.1 - 5.2. All pre-test and post-test leak checks were well below the applicable limit. Minimum metered volumes and percent isokinetics were also met where applicable. Table 5.3 displays the results of the EPA Method 26A Audit Sample analysis. The results were transmitted by e-mail to Mr. Bryon Richwine, Pennsylvania Dept of Environmental Protection. On November 6, 2007, Mr. Richwine infonned Air Compliance Testing, Ine. that the two (2) reported audit concentrations met EPA Method 26A, Section 11.5.3 criteria. Shawn Bodnar was certified on October 3, 2007 as a Visible Emissions Evaluator. The certification expires in six months from the issue date. For quality assurance, the observer obtained a view of the emissions with the best available contrasting background and with the sun oriented in the 140 ° sector to his back. Readings were taken every 15 seconds and made to the nearest 5% opacity. 

## 5.2 QA/QC ProBlems No QA/QC problems occurred during this test event.

Test Date: October 10 and 11, 2007 Page 22 Air 

### Compliance Testing, Inc. 

## - 071008~ p p 

## ~. p 

## ~ G S C F N d G
E 

# U \ Q d
~

~ D 

### ai b

~ C .~ Fn

... Y i 

### C. ~ .~ ~
~ ~ N kn

~ 

### a d d
~ P.~ 

## W

~ H

~ .~ ~ ~ ~ N

N m @ a

ti p O

~ C N O N 9 0 U 0 N N O N N h p M O O
p p N 

### V vl

~ 

### n O 

### vt N p



### O y ,~ O A Y C

~ e W 7 O

O

~ 

### N y u

~ O

p V O

p U U d o aJ o N A N

~ N Ry Zy N id b f t Y U

~ N Q

~ b N

't7 N ~

o ~ N N R~ A

V ¢ p V

~ 

### U O ~ ~ h C 

### a x p

o O p r

~ .' O ~" O~ ~ ✓ " 

# Q ~ ~ O p C ~ W

N ~

O V 0

. 

## U E ~

A t E tl O ~ U N ~ vOi b



## v a ~



## ~ Q 

## ~ 0 

### N N

U

~

### ° p p 

### ~ °

~ s ~ ~ w y 

## ti d 

# G G O U Q 

# ° o

o V 

### O A d

~ 

# a o

p 

# o p 

### o

G L L 

# x 0 h 

# 0

ro U U „p o o A

c 

### p a u u ~

N „ ~ y



### d ^

✓ 'O ti

N 

## °

p



### ~ 

## 0 U

d ~ o V

~ o
~ h
~ 

## a

p o

o ~ R~ s~

.
~ 

# x 7 

# °

0 0 O

~ 

## 0

O

~ 

# a v u 8 E L TJ
-
~ i RS ftl (n V) 

### C7 C7 C 

# •a ..o ° Q Q :x k

~ 

## ,~ 

# d ~



## ~ 

# 0 o

'L7 

## a 

# 0

N 

### a 

# 0 n

• d o 

# ° s

U d 

## N

N rn N 

### a



## 0 0

~ 

## C N 

# O_ N 

# a O

~ ~ 

### N N ~ N 

### N ~a a 

### R r d ~ 

### T 

### ¢`

9 d O G 

### s Q d 

### p e e ° 

### o

~ 

### R
~ a o 

## 5 Qa

i. 

## A• >wa., L

O„
_ U Q ' tl y c Q 

### x y ` ~ a L « s F 

## 5 v o r 

### C1 R

a 

### ' m• ° - w y o 

## 'iv i G d U c ~ o 

## w L L " rn y 

### W 

### [r L W o 

### d Y ~
~ 

### d a R r 

### d ~ Y• 

### a`

9 a O G s ~ N ~ a A p O o 

### m a

~ 

### R v+ 

# = S3 d

~ 

# a_

aa a L 

## « oa>W•oE .°,

W r d U .~w

d F A 5 " ~

N L 

### U 

## o ~ 

## `wjy,

a mU 6 U 3 o a L 0 L L ~ 

## a a R r ~ 

### a r 

### d`

, o d O C s 

### 0 e d G o

a d o
~ r R = a 

# _

ad ~ ~

~ 

## 0 w • 

## ro o "' s A d U e Q

N L

R d U ~ o
~ L 

### w A a o R 

### w rn 

# H V W 

# v o a ~ a c R 

### « a 

### v r 

### a 'O V G L

~ a O o ~ R 

# 5 Qe "' A• = ->c. ` .a g = 

# W F ~ 

# y U w v

~ 

### » 

# U

~ 

### A U

L L 

## d Q U e 0 

### L ~ 

### d ~ 0 0 ~ 0

~ ~ 

# w N F ~ N U C 

## ro 

# a E 0 U : R



### N Vi 0 a F

~

~ m 

## 0 `v n 0 U ~ W N 0 N h

# 0

Ci C

~ C i3 N I~ 

### v U C 4t Q E O 

### U ~ Q

y

~ .+
~ h d
~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ 

### N b 0 ~ ~.+ ~
~ d~ ?a 

# W M ~ ~
~ ~ ~ N W m a

r 0 0 

### N

~ C N O 

### N ~ O ~ ~ N W ~ N 

### N F"

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation Mid Atlantic Plant 

## 6.0 APPENDIX Appendix attached.

Test Date: October 10 and 11, 2007 Page 27 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 071008

# APPENDIX to 

## Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

# Determination of Total Filterable Particulate Matter, Hydrochloric Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid and Visible Emissions Bickley Kiln (Source ID: 102) and Harrop Kiln

(Source ID: 101) EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, and 26A Glen-Gerv Corporation Mid Atlantie Plant

Shoemakersville, Penosylvania Date Conducted: October 10 and 11, 2007 Job Number: 071008

Prepared by: 

## Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

PO Box 41156 

### Cleveland OH 44141-0156 

### Phone:(800) EPA-AIR1 (372-2471) 

### Report Date: November 7, 2007

### 4 C ~ O ~ N

~ E n — M 

## u O a ~ 

## =U C O V O ~ a ~ — o 0 o ~ 

### ` E 0 0 0

~ 

### m @ ~ 

### o "- ~ ~ 0 

### m .v a) N c @ ¢ @ O Qd L

U 

### y N @ aQU O ir 

## a o 2 ~


### o ~ m ~ 

### C V U1 p

~ 

## On~ 

# (D o U E ~ 

## o 0 0 o y o w

~ 

## Y m 0 a ~ 

## ° Q @ ~ 

## o O N 0, 

### N 

## TL O
O m O O M @ ~ w ~ — g


### ~ O w N p 

### ~ C O N @ N N 0 ~ 

# 0 v 

## 0 m c @ U 

### C J a N 

### C 

## E ~ a c @ 

## N ~ 0 ~ 

### O `o 

# Q

~ 

## 3 0 E

~ 

### E ~ 

## E @ 

### 3 O ~ N ~ N w ~ 

# m m 3 

### P3 0 0 U .

~ .. 

### @ O W C O 

### m ~ ~ + v r ~ 

# N m ° o a ~ 

# N U ~ T 

# c ai o tI

~ HT G_ +

~ -' O 

# w U
~ 

# O C C

O ~ ~ 

# U K w N ~

n O O

~ 

### E :E

U N N N

a~ 0

F ~

~ 

# ~ v v

a 

# ~ o 

# a 0 0 0 

## a V U

v 

### N 

# a o a

~ o O O

C C 

# c O Y Y @ U O O J U @ 

### m S w p C O


### M

- `i °

m 

### S