alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 109.100 ILP Intermediary eligibility and continuing participation requirements. ( a ) *Organization type:* An ILP Intermediary must be a private, nonprofit entity other than an intermediary participating in the SBA Microloan program as described in subpart G of Part 120. Eligible entities include: ( 1 ) Private, nonprofit community development corporations;
( 2 ) Consortiums of private, nonprofit organizations or nonprofit community development corporations; and
( 3 ) Agencies of or nonprofit entities established by Native American tribal governments.
( b ) *Prior experience:* An ILP Intermediary must have at least one year of successful experience making and servicing loans to startup, newly established, or growing small businesses.
( c ) *Management and operations.* ( 1 ) An ILP Intermediary must have paid staff with loan making and servicing experience acceptable to SBA.
( 2 ) An ILP Intermediary must have a continuing ability to evaluate, process, close, disburse, service and liquidate small business loans including, but not limited to: ( i ) Holding sufficient permanent capital (as determined by SBA) to support lending activities under this program; and
( ii ) Maintaining satisfactory SBA performance, as determined by SBA in its discretion.
( 3 ) An ILP Intermediary must meet and maintain the ethical requirements of 13 CFR 120.140.
( 4 ) An ILP Intermediary (and any Affiliates) that participates in other SBA programs must be in compliance with those program requirements.
( 5 ) An ILP Intermediary must be in good standing with its Federal and/or State regulator, as applicable.
( 6 ) An ILP Intermediary must have the ability to comply with the ILP Program Requirements, including reporting requirements, as such requirements are revised from time to time, and maintain compliance with ILP Program Requirements for as long as the ILP Intermediary participates in the ILP program.
National Park Service 

U.S. Department of the Interior 

Wrangell-St. Elias National Park & Preserve 

May Creek Airstrip (MYK) 

Location: May Creek (MYK). This airstrip is located between May and Chititu Creek, approximately 11.5 miles southeast of 

McCarthy. N61 20.14 W142 41.21 

Description: 

CTAF 122.9 

Elevation 1,650’ 

Airstrip is turf and is 2,700’ feet long. Public tie-downs are available on the southeast end of the airstrip. The airstrip is frequently 

used as a staging area and may have other users.
<page>                                   EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter World
Currency Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin
Perry, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:  /s/Kevin Perry

Name:	   Kevin Perry
Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date:	August 15, 2005
Exhibit
      32.1





Ener1,
      Inc.


500
      West
      Cypress Creek Road, Suite 100


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309





November
      14, 2007





Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549





Re:
      Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350





Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1,
      Inc.,
      for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission, I, Dr. Peter Novak, Chief Executive Officer of Ener1,
      Inc.,
      hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            such
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended
                September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
                78o(d));
                and





2)
            the
                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
                Ener1,
                Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, fairly presents,
                in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                Ener1, Inc.




/s/
                Dr. Peter NovakDr.
                Peter Novak
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer and
              Duly
                Authorized Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
      retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.





This
      certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to Ener1, Inc.’s
      quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
      to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
      reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
      except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
      filing.
!(

!(

Ü

Appendix H: Whiskeytown NRA Designated Smoking Areas
Exhibit
23





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





As
independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos 333-107721,
333-112871, and 333-140820 on Form S-8 of our report dated December
23, 2009, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of LiveDeal,
Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for
years then ended, included in the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K of LiveDeal,
Inc. and Subsidiaries.











/s/ Mayer Hoffman McCann
P.C.





Phoenix,
Arizona


December
23, 2009
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan LOZANO-CADENA, also known as Juan Guadalupe Lozano-Cadena, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-10942.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

Susan B. Cowger, Tamara Lynn Reno, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Carlos R. Cardona, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Jason Douglas Hawkins, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Lozano-Cadena raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and *342the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.707 When does the D/GC transmit the protest file and to whom?

Upon receipt of an appeal petition, the D/GC will send to OHA a copy of the protest file relating to that determination. The D/GC will certify and authenticate that the protest file, to the best of his or her knowledge, is a true and correct copy of the protest file.
#### Fremont C. McKoon, Respondent, v. Dilts Machine Works, Inc., Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
October 22, 2015

Mr. Chris Houseman

3064 5 Mile Rd.

Traverse City, MI 49686 

Dear Mr. Houseman:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your August 6, 2015 exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA-2015-3376 but 

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at

least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If

you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
§ 423.35 Animals. ( a ) You must not bring pets or other animals into public buildings, public transportation vehicles, or sanitary facilities. This provision does not apply to properly trained animals assisting persons with disabilities, such as seeing-eye dogs.
( b ) You must not abandon any animal on Reclamation facilities, lands, or waterbodies, or harass, endanger, or attempt to collect any animal except game you are attempting to take in the course of authorized hunting, fishing, or trapping.
( c ) Any unauthorized, unclaimed, or unattended animal on Reclamation lands may be: ( 1 ) Removed in accordance with Federal law, and applicable State and local laws; and
( 2 ) Confined at a location designated by an authorized official, who may assess a reasonable impoundment fee that must be paid before the impounded animal is released to its owner.
( d ) The following animals are prohibited and are subject to removal in accordance with Federal law, and applicable State and local laws: ( 1 ) Captive wild or exotic animals (including, but not limited to, cougars, lions, bears, bobcats, wolves, and snakes), except as allowed by a permit issued under subpart D of this part 423; and
( 2 ) Any pets or animals displaying vicious or aggressive behavior or posing a threat to public safety or deemed a public nuisance.
( e ) You must not bury, deposit, or scatter animal remains, or place memorials, markers, vases, or plaques on or in Reclamation facilities, lands, or waterbodies. This section does not apply to the burial of parts of fish or wildlife taken in legal hunting, fishing, or trapping.
( f ) Where recreation facilities or other areas of Reclamation lands and waterbodies are operated through a contract or other agreement by a managing recreation partner of another Federal, State, local, or Tribal governmental entity, such as a State park, the laws, ordinances, and regulations of those partner agencies pertaining to animals and pets shall be enforced by those partner agencies. However, Reclamation retains the authority to take necessary actions to safeguard the security and safety of the public and such Reclamation facilities, lands, and waterbodies.
[73 FR 75349, Dec. 11, 2008, as amended at 88 FR 80992, Nov. 21, 2023]
HomeData

# Inventory of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Cases

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, August 22, 2023
###### Editorial Note on Part 121

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 121 appear at 72 FR 50039 and 50040, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 121.902 What size standards are applicable to programs of other agencies?

*SBA size standards.* The size standards for compliance with programs of other agencies are those for SBA programs which are most comparable to the programs of such other agencies, unless the agency and SBA agree otherwise.

[67 FR 13716, Mar. 26, 2002]
EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter World
Currency Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey D. Hahn,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:  /s/Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:	   Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date:	August 14, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Willbros Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Warren L. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: November 9, 2004                          /s/ Warren L. Williams
                                           ----------------------------------
                                                  Warren L. Williams
                                                Chief Financial Officer

                                       32
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-120606, 333-130941, 333-17533, 333-139918, 333-147387, 333-148740, 333-156799, 333-156800, 333-165392 and 333-171978) of ZipRealty, Inc. of our reportdated March 9, 2011 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose,California 

March 9, 2011
#### Alpha Crane Service, Inc., et al. v. Capitol Crane Company et al. Paul J. Aparo, Administrator (Estate of Steven J. Palmieri) v. United Technologies Corporation et al.

James E. Kernan, in support of the petition.

Constance L. Epstein, in opposition.

Decided April 23, 1986

The petition of the defendant Wetherell Corporation for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 6 Conn. App. 60, is denied.
Reader’s Guide for Chlorimuron ethyl CRM: Wilhelmena Livingston

EPA/OCSPP/OPP/PRD

Reader’s Guide to Chlorimuron ethyl Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0478

Publication Date: December 22, 2010

EPA has created this document to provid e an organizational structure to the Registration Review Chlorimuron ethyl Docket for Public Comments. The docket index groups related documents. The first group c ontains the Federal Register and Docket Organizational Documents, the second group co ntains the Human Health Assessment, the third group contains the Envi ronmental Risk Assessment document, and the fourth group contains use/usage information and a revi ew of human incidents. The Agency is providing the “Reader’s Guide” to allow the re ader to more easily access and navigate the

various items contained in the chlorimuron ethyl docket.

Federal Register and Docket Organizational Documents:

Docket Item 1. Federal Register Notice: Chlori muron ethyl Registration Review

Docket Item 2. Reader’s Guide to the Chlorimuron ethyl Docket # EPA- HQ-OPP-2010-0478

Docket Item 3. Chlorimuron ethyl Summary Document

Human Health Documents for Registration Review

Docket Item 4. Chlorimuron ethyl. Human Health Assessment Scoping Document in Support of Registration Review (September 27, 2010)

This document evaluates the status of the human health assessments to determine the scope of work necessary to support the regi stration review of the sulfonylurea class herbicide chlorimuron ethyl.

Environmental Fate and Effects Documents for Registration Review

Docket Item 5. Registration Review: Preliminary Problem Formulation for the Ecological Risk Assessment of Chlorimuron-ethyl (November 19, 2010)

This document defines the problem for the assessment, and develops a plan for analyzing and characterizing the ecological risks.Use and Usage Information for Registration Review

Docket Item 6. PRD Appendix A Food/Feed & Non-Food/Non Feed Uses Considered in Registra tion Review Work Planning. Chlorimuron ethyl (128901). (January 19, 2010)

This table lists the food/feed and non-food/non - feed uses for chlorimuron ethyl.

Docket Item 7. Chlorimuron ethyl (128901) Scr eening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA) (January 25, 2010)

This document provides the available estimat es of pesticide usage data for chlorimuron ethyl that is used on agricultu ral crops in the United States.

Docket Item 8. BEAD Chemical Profile for Regist ration Review: Chlorimuron- ethyl (128901) (December 2, 2010)

The purpose of this document is to convey usage information and a broad overview of the pest management roles of pesticides that are beginning to undergo registration review.

Incident Report for Chlorimuron ethyl

Docket Item 9. Chlorimuron ethyl Revi ew of Human Incidents

(August 19, 2010)

This report represents poisoning incidents occurring in the United States from 2000 to the present for chlorimuron ethyl.
Exhibit 31.2 

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**pursuant to Section 302 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, W. Glen Winchell, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of DiametricsMedical, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: October 24, 2003