alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Required Continuing Training Program for HP Professionals

## HPPOS-247 PDR-9111220100

See the memorandum from L. J. Cunningham to J. H. Joyner (and others) dated November 13, 1990. This memo provides guidance on what constitutes a reasonable continuing training program for HP professionals. HPPOS-247 contains a related topic.

Standard Technical Specifications require licensees to be committed to some ANSI standard that establishes a retraining or continuing training program that includes HP professionals. The following guidance should be considered when judging the adequacy of a continuous training program (CTP) for HP professionals.
        - Purpose of CTP
        To keep up with state-of-the-art technology
To keep abreast of current industry issues
To maintain awareness of industry performance
To refresh initial technical training

        - Guidance for CTP
        Professional programs need to be flexible
Licensees need to formally document commitment for CTP
Time requirements for accomplishing CTP goals should be specified but can be flexible, with large degrees of freedom

        - What Counts as Technical / Supervisory Training
        Includes, but not limited to, related formal course work
Progress toward ABHP certification (and continuing credits toward maintenance or certification)
Professional technical meetings (e.g., HPS, EEI, EPRI, ANS, Westinghouse REM seminar, etc.)
Trips or temporary assignments to other plants
Structured self-education
Others

NRC is currently planning to issue a proposed rule and attendant regulatory guide concerning training. In addition, the Human Factors Assessment Branch has reviewed and supports this guidance. However, as a result of the rulemaking, the guidance provided here may require modification. [Note: The Training and Qualification Rule 10 CFR 50.120 has been issued without a regulatory guide. No further guidance is necessary.]

**Regulatory references:** Technical Specifications

**Subject codes:** 1.2, 12.19

**Applicability:** Reactors

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, October 18, 2017
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2082

NATHANIEL HAMPTON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

PAULA EDGERTON; ROBINA SCHENCK; CYNTHIA WILLIAMS; WILLIE 

COLEMAN, Housing Authority of Florence,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. J. Michelle Childs, District 

Judge. (4:14-cv-04697-JMC)

Submitted: January 28, 2016 Decided: April 22, 2016

Before GREGORY and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Hampton, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Kirk Battle, 

BATTLE LAW FIRM, LLC, Conway, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Hampton appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants. 

Hampton v. Edgerton, No. 4:14-cv-04697-JMC (D.S.C. Sept. 9, 

2015). On appeal, Hampton argues that the district court erred 

in its conclusion regarding his claims for: (1) interference 

with his freedom of association; (2) retaliation; (3) civil 

conspiracy; (4) a due process violation, and; (5) intentional 

infliction of emotional distress.

Regarding Hampton’s First Amendment claim, assuming, 

without deciding, that Hampton had a fundamental right to 

associate with his girlfriend, his right was not infringed upon 

in this instance. Where government action implicates a 

fundamental right, it will be subject to strict scrutiny only 

where the action “interferes directly and substantially with the 

fundamental right.” Waters v. Gaston Cty., 57 F.3d 422, 426 

(4th Cir. 1995). Where government action has only an incidental 

effect on a fundamental right, rational basis review applies. 

Id.

The governmental policy at issue here did not prohibit 

cohabitation with a nonmarital partner or forbid it altogether 

without permission of the government. The governmental action 

constituted “[a]t most, an unwelcome hurdle” to Hampton’s 
3

association with his girlfriend and is therefore subject to 

rational basis review. Id. Under that standard, the policy 

need only be rationally related to a legitimate governmental 

interest. Wilkins v. Gaddy, 734 F.3d 344, 348-49 (4th Cir. 

2013). We conclude that the government policy is permissible 

under this standard of review.

We have reviewed the record and find no merit to Hampton’s 

remaining contentions. Accordingly, although we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Draft IGCC MACT floor spreadsheet Bill Maxwell to: Cortney_Higgins 03/04/2011 03:41 PM Cc: RobertJ Wayland

Floor analysis_IGCC_030411.xlsx

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 4863]

In accordance with Section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)), I hereby rescind the Determination of September 13, 1990 (Public Notice 1264) that Iraq is a country which has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism.

This action is a further step to cement the partnership of the United States and Iraq in combating acts of international terrorism, and is an act of symbolic importance to the new Iraqi government. This rescission is appropriate although nearly all the restrictions applicable to countries that have supported terrorism, including the application of 22 U.S.C. 1605(a)(7), were made inapplicable with respect to Iraq permanently in Presidential Directive No. 2003-23 of May 7, 2003, pursuant to sec. 1503 of Pub. L. 108-11, and as affirmed in the Conference Report for Pub. L. 108-106.

This rescission shall also satisfy the provisions of section 620A(c)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, Pub. L. 87-195, as amended, and section 40(f)(1)(A) of the Arms Export Control Act, Pub. L. 90-629, as amended.

Dated: October 7, 2004.

Colin L. Powell,

Secretary of State, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 04-23470 Filed 10-19-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-01 January 27, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson Phone: 817-860-8128 Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

CLYDE C. OSTERHOLTZ NAMED NRC RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT FORT CALHOUN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has named Clyde C. Osterholtz resident inspector at

Fort Calhoun Station, a nuclear power plant near Ft. Calhoun, Nebraska. Mr. Osterholtz joins senior

resident inspector Wayne Walker.

Mr. Osterholtz is a 1990 graduate of The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, with a

bachelor of science degree in Engineering Physics/Nuclear Engineering. Prior to college, Mr.

Osterholtz was an electronics technician and reactor operator in the U.S. Navy submarine service.

Mr. Osterholtz joined the NRC after graduation in 1990 and worked for six years in Region III

offices in the operator licensing branch. He then became resident inspector at Ginna Station in NRC’s

Region I before moving to Fort Calhoun in December last year.

Mr. Osterholtz can be reached at the Fort Calhoun Station at 402-426-9611.

###
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7171

DMITRY PRONIN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LIEUTENANT TROY JOHNSON; OFFICER FLOURNOY; OFFICER 

MIDDLEBROOK; OFFICER WILSON; OFFICER CRAWFORD; KENNETH 

ATKINSON; DANIEL FALLEN; REX BLOCKER; LOUISA FUERTESRASARIO; SANDRA K. LATHROP; JAKE BURKETT; BRANDON 

BURKETT; JOHN BRYANT; PATINA WALTON-GRIER; HENRI WALL; 

EDWARD HAMPTON; WILLIAM JOHNSON; LIEUTENANT EDA 

OLIVERA-NEGRON, Operations,

 Defendants - Appellees,

and

SHU STAFF MEMBERS,

 Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Orangeburg. David C. Norton, District Judge. (5:12-cv-03416-DCN)

Submitted: May 28, 2019 Decided: June 12, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dmitry Pronin, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Dmitry Pronin appeals from the district court’s order freezing his prison account. 

Subsequent to his appeal, Pronin filed a motion to unfreeze his funds in district court. 

After a hearing on April 24, 2019, the district court entered an order on April 29 noting 

that Pronin intended to withdraw his motion to unfreeze his funds. Thus, the court denied 

the motion to unfreeze as moot. In a supplemental brief on appeal, Pronin states that he 

still wishes to challenge the court’s order.

Based on Pronin’s representation in district court, we find that Pronin has waived 

his challenge to the freezing of his prison account. Thus, we dismiss the appeal as moot. 

However, we note that the dismissal is without prejudice to Pronin’s renewal of his 

motion to unfreeze in district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 321.8 Reports.

The Department of Defense, Department of Energy, and Maritime Administration shall furnish the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency with reports on items and facilities for programs under § 321.2 (a) and (b) of this part, and with such other periodic and special reports as he may require affecting the maintenance of the mobilization base.
§ 333.70 Adjustments or exceptions. ( a ) A person may submit a request to FEMA for an adjustment or exception on the ground that: ( 1 ) A provision of this part or an official action results in an undue or exceptional hardship on that person not suffered generally by others in similar situations and circumstances; or
( 2 ) The consequence of following a provision of this part or an official action is contrary to the intent of the Defense Production Act, other applicable statutes, or this part.
( b ) Each request for adjustment or exception must be in writing and contain a complete statement of all the facts and circumstances related to the provision of this part or official action from which adjustment is sought and a full and precise statement of the reasons why relief should be provided.
( c ) The submission of a request for adjustment or exception shall not relieve any person from the obligation of complying with the provisions of this part or official action in question while the request is being considered unless such interim relief is granted in writing by FEMA.
( d ) A decision of FEMA under this section may be appealed to the Administrator. (For information on the appeal procedure, see § 333.71.)
Editorial Note on Part 124
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 124 appear at 72 FR 50040, Aug. 30, 2007, and 76 FR 8253, Feb. 11, 2011.

§ 124.704 What additional management and technical assistance is reserved exclusively for concerns eligible to receive 8(a) contracts? In addition to the management and technical assistance available under § 124.702, Section 7(j)(10) of the Small Business Act authorizes SBA to provide additional management and technical assistance through its service providers exclusively to small business concerns eligible to receive 8(a) contracts, including: ( a ) Assistance to develop comprehensive business plans with specific business targets, objectives, and goals;
( b ) Other nonfinancial services necessary for a Participant's growth and development, including loan packaging; and
( c ) Assistance in obtaining equity and debt financing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from consolidated financial statements and notes thereto to
Jefferson Savings Bancorp, Inc. at and for nine months ended
September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       8,170,181
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      10,166,916
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                225,400,366
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                  1,255,942,286
<ALLOWANCE>                                  6,632,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,572,334,374
<DEPOSITS>                                 977,358,814
<SHORT-TERM>                               450,775,563
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         19,627,896
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       101,001
<OTHER-SE>                                 124,471,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,572,334,374
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             67,700,998
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           10,237,686
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,389,204
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            79,327,888
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          35,705,074
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          48,857,041
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       30,470,847
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              56,975
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             20,636,619
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,477,881
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   7,421,881
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,421,881
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.83
<LOANS-NON>                                  7,992,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   779,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               941,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             6,659,294
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   27,107
<RECOVERIES>                                       344
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            6,632,531
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         4,294,877
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      2,337,654


</TABLE>
§ 206.225 Emergency work. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Emergency protective measures to save lives, to protect public health and safety, and to protect improved property are eligible.
( 2 ) In determining whether emergency work is required, the Regional Administrator may require certification by local State, and/or Federal officials that a threat exists, including identification and evaluation of the threat and recommendations of the emergency work necessary to cope with the threat.
( 3 ) In order to be eligible, emergency protective measures must: ( i ) Eliminate or lessen immediate threats to live, public health or safety; or
( ii ) Eliminate or lessen immediate threats of significant additional damage to improved public or private property through measures which are cost effective.
( b ) *Emergency access.* An access facility that is not publicly owned or is not the direct responsibility of an eligible applicant for repair or maintenance may be eligible for emergency repairs or replacement provided that emergency repair or replacement of the facility economically eliminates the need for temporary housing. The work will be limited to that necessary for the access to remain passable through events which can be considered an immediate threat. The work must be performed by an eligible applicant and will be subject to cost sharing requirements.
( c ) *Emergency communications.* Emergency communications necessary for the purpose of carrying out disaster relief functions may be established and may be made available to State and local government officials as deemed appropriate. Such communications are intended to supplement but not replace normal communications that remain operable after a major disaster. FEMA funding for such communications will be discontinued as soon as the needs have been met.
( d ) *Emergency public transportation.* Emergency public transportation to meet emergency needs and to provide transportation to public places and such other places as necessary for the community to resume its normal pattern of life as soon as possible is eligible. Such transportation is intended to supplement but not replace predisaster transportation facilities that remain operable after a major disaster. FEMA funding for such transportation will be discontinued as soon as the needs have been met.
### subpart 1—workforce investment activities and providers
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Equipment Growth & Income Fund VII (the Partnership), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner and of the Partnership, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 
 
 
 /s/ Richard K Brock
 Richard K Brock
 Chief Financial Officer of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 August 13, 2004
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-49 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Tuesday, October 12, 1999)

NRC STAFF ISSUES ORDER TO ROANOKE COMPANY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued an order to Roof Survey and Consultants,

Inc. in Roanoke, Virginia, involving the licensee’s possession and use of a roofing gauge

containing radioactive material without paying license fees or complying with a previously-issued

order.

The order requires that the company keep the gauge in locked storage and not use it; contact the

NRC within five days; have the gauge leak tested; and transfer the gauge to someone with a

license to possess it within 30 days. Upon completion of these requirements, the NRC will revoke

the license.

The previous NRC order required the company to either pay the annual fee for an NRC license

or transfer the gauge to another licensee. The company has not complied with that original order.

If the company does not comply with the new order, it may be subject to civil penalties of $500

per day until the order’s requirements are met. If the gauge is transferred within 30 days, there

will be no civil penalties.

#
### §563. Oath of office

The Director and each United States marshal and law enforcement officer of the Service, before taking office, shall take an oath or affirmation to faithfully execute the duties of that office.

(Added Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7608(a)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4513.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 563, added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(c), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 619, specifically stated the oath of office to be taken, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–690, §7608(a)(1). See section 561(h) of this title.