alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      37,987,956
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  996,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,355,770
<PP&E>                                       7,614,836
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,093,528
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,653,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,290,727
<BONDS>                                      1,256,034
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       170,989
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,089,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,653,622
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,447,810
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            39,040,558
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             167,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (35,055,910)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (35,055,910)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (35,055,910)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.22)


</TABLE>
# Europeiska unionens C 297A/29 n

| | ISSN 1725-2504 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 297A |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 48 årgången29 november 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2504

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 297A

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

48 årgången29 november 2005

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Upplysningar |
| | Kommissionen |
| 2005/C 297A/1 | Utlysning av tjänst som ordförande för gemenskapens växtsortsmyndighet (lönegrad A*14) (artikel 29.2 i tjänsteföreskrifterna) – KOM/2005/10015 | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

III   Upplysningar

Kommissionen

2005/C 297A/1

Utlysning av tjänst som ordförande för gemenskapens växtsortsmyndighet (lönegrad A*14) (artikel 29.2 i tjänsteföreskrifterna) – KOM/2005/10015

1

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

III Upplysningar

Kommissionen

| 29.11.2005 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 297/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2005

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 297/1

---

UTLYSNING AV TJÄNST SOM ORDFÖRANDE FÖR GEMENSKAPENS VÄXTSORTSMYNDIGHET

(lönegrad A*14)

(artikel 29.2 i tjänsteföreskrifterna)

KOM/2005/10015

(2005/C 297 A/01)

Gemenskapens växtsortsmyndighet söker en ordförande.

Sökande till tjänsten skall vara medborgare i någon av Europeiska unionens medlemsstater.

Ordföranden skall utses av rådet utifrån en förteckning över sökande som kommissionen skall lägga fram efter yttrande från myndighetens förvaltningsråd. Löne- och anställningsvillkoren för tjänsten är de som enligt tjänsteföreskrifterna gäller för tjänstemän i lönegrad A*14 vid Europeiska gemenskaperna. Gemenskapens växtsortsmyndighet och kommissionen tillämpar en personalpolitik för lika möjligheter.

Befattningsbeskrivning, ansökningsformulär och anvisningar för hur ansökan skall inges kan hämtas på Internet på följande adresser:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

eller

http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm

Senaste ansökningsdag är den 31 december 2005 (se anvisningarna för ansökan).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 520 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 520

   To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to modify a 
            provision relating to acquisition of beach fill.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                March 2 (legislative day, March 1), 2021

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to modify a 
            provision relating to acquisition of beach fill.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sand Acquisition, Nourishment, and 
Development Act'' or the ``SAND Act''.

SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF BEACH FILL.

    Section 935 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2299) is amended by striking ``if such materials are not 
available from domestic sources for environmental or economic 
reasons''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Mississippi Lumber Company v. John K. Joice et al. Charles F. Thompson et al., Appellees, v. John K. Joice et al., Appellants.

Gen. No. 15,957.

*Equity—cross-bill.*A cross-bill is properly dismissed where not germane to the original bill.

*109Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. George A. Carpenter, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1909.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Affirmed.

Opinion filed December 30, 1912.

Archibald Cattell, for appellants.

Charles E. Pope and D. A. Clithero, for appellees; John S. Miller, of counsel.

Defress, Buckingham, Ritter & Campbell, for Mississippi Lumber Company.

Mr. Presiding Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

The decree in the above-entitled cause is reviewed and as modified affirmed in Mississippi Lumber Co. v. Joice, *post,*110, in an opinion filed this date, to which we refer for a more detailed statement of the case and the issues involved. The said decree was in part as follows; “That the cross-bill herein is not germane to the original bill, and is without equity, and that the same should be and is dismissed for want of equity.” The cross-complainants bring this appeal to reverse the said decree only as to the dismissing of the said cross-bill. By the cross-bill the cross-complainants sought to recover individually the secret profit claimed to have been made by Joice, Pope and Pate in the transaction in question; but it is stated by them that if this court affirms the decree finding that the Mississippi Lumber Company is entitled to the relief therein ordered, it is not their desire to urge the reversal here sought.. However, we think that the cross-bill was properly dismissed as not germane to the original bill, and the decree as here appealed from is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
#### Quality Fruit Wines Corp., Respondent, v. Fiore Cribari et al., Individually and as Copartners, Doing Business under the Name of B. Cribari *&*Sons, Appellants.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel arid Sneed, JJ. [See 272 App. Div. 1070.]
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section




National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Travel VA National Homes for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers





Contact Us
  Site Index
 Last updated: August 31, 2017
 Tools Calendar
Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
### [§214. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–455, title V, §504(b)(1), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1565]

Section, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 70; Apr. 2, 1963, Pub. L. 88–4, §1, 77 Stat. 4; Feb. 26, 1964, Pub. L. 88–272, title II, §212(a), 78 Stat. 49; Dec. 10, 1971, Pub. L. 92–178, title II, §210(a), 85 Stat. 518; Mar. 29, 1975, Pub. L. 94–12, title II, §206, 89 Stat. 32, provided for allowance of deduction for household and dependent care services necessary for gainful employment; defined "qualifying individual", "employment-related expenses", "maintaining a household"; limitation on deductible amount; income limitation; and special rules and regulations applicable in the determination and allowance of deduction.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1975, see section 508 of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as an Effective Date of 1976 Amendment note under section 3 of this title.
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 

AIHUISHOU INTERNATIONAL CO. LTD. 

Number                         
                                         
                                         
                         Class A Ordinary Shares 

Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands 

Share capital is US$1,000,000 divided into 

1,000,000,000 shares of a par value of US$0.001 each, comprising of 

(i) 941,472,561 Class A Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.001 each,  

(ii) 47,240,103 Class B Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.001 each, and 

(iii) 11,287,336 Class C Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.001 each 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY
THAT                                         
                                       is the
registered holder of
                                   
         Class A Ordinary Shares in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association thereof. 

EXECUTED on behalf of the said Company on the
                     day of                by: 

DIRECTOR     ___________________________________
#### Westchester Mortgage Company, Respondent, v. Thomas B. McIntire, Inc., and Another, Defendants, Impleaded with William H. Foster, Appellant.

Appellant has neglected to comply with the rule* that upon *928motions of this character he shall file an affidavit stating facts showing that there is merit in the appeal. If within five days appellant file an affidavit complying with such rule, the motion will be considered on its merits; in default thereof the motion will be granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ.

*

See App. Div. Rules, 2d. Dept., Special Rule.—[Rep.
# United State s Court of Appeals For the F irst Circuit

No. 09-2667 CAROLINE DELIA, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., Defendant, Appellee, VERIZON INFORMATION SERVICES INC.; VERIZON SUPERPAGES; IDEARC MEDIA CORP.; VERIZON DIRECTORIES SERVICES - EAST INC., n/k/a Idearc Media Services - East Inc.; MALVERN SMALLWOOD; Defendants.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on August 24, 2011 is amended as follows:
On the coversheet replace " Thomas H. Winter" with "Thomas H. Wintner"
Case 1:13-cv-00713-RJL Docum ent18 Filed 10/09/13 Page1Of2

U NITED STATES D ISTRICT CO URT

DISTRICT O F CO LUM BIA

l

FILED BY / D.C.

JdL C8 2222

ANGELAE.NOBLE

cLERKU.s.DlST.c7:

s.D.OFFI.A.-MIAMI

Petitioller

CivilA ctionN o.l:l3-cv-713-RLW

REPUBLIC OF TH E CON GO ,

Respondent.

A M ENDED ORD ER A ND JUD GM ENT

Upon consideration of PetitionerCommissions ImportExport S.A.(çtpetitioner''l's

Petition to Confirm ArbitralAward (Dkt.No. l) and Motion forDefaultJudgmentand

Confirmation ofArbitralAward(Dkt.No.12),

subm issionstiledinsupportthereof,itishereby:

along with the M em orandum and evidentialy

O RDERED that the Petitioner's M otion for D efault Judgm ent and Confinnation of

ArbitralAwardisGRANTED;itis

FURTH ER O RD ER ED thatthe fsnalarbitralaw ard isstled on January 2l,2013,by the

International Cham ber of Com m erce, lntelmational Coul4 of Arbitration, in the m atter

denom inated Com missions lmport Export Ac/p?,/p/p'c

No.16257/EC/ND/M CP,is hereby CONFIRM ED,pursuantto

(rtp/?jlt7,

the FederalArbitration Act,

Case 1:20-mc-22804-BB Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/08/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case1:13-cv-00713-RJL Docum ent18 Filed 10/09/13 Page 2Of2

FURTHER ORDERED thatjudgmentishcrcby entered in favorofPetitionerand

against Respondent, Republic of the Congo,

US$855,000.Theseamotlntsretlectthesum totalofthet-ollowing:

* theaw arded sum off 222,749,598.82,.

* intereston theawarded sum atarateofl0% ,l-unningfrom December31,

2003, com pounded annually on D ecember 31, through the date of this

Judgm ent,O ctober9,20l3,foratotalinterestaw ard off 342,478,136.90*,

f 1,956,425 forreim bul-sem entofapol-tion ofClaim ant'slegalexpensesin

thearbitrationproceedings;and

US$ 855,000,representing a pol-tion of the lntem ationalChamberof Commerce

arbitrationcosts.

the am ounts of: f 567,184,160.72 and

Itis FUR TH ER O RD ERED thatthe Courthereby CO NFIRM S the aw ard ofpostawardinterestinfavorofPetitioner,and,pursuantto28U.S.C.j1961,ENTERSjudgmentfor

post-judgmentinterestatthestatutoryrate,from thedateofthisJudgmentuntilthedateoffu11

paym ent.

SO O RDERED .

Date: October9,2013

. l. DigitalysignedbyJudge

-'N

.aw ., RobertL.Wilkins

SJ':'j.:..- DN:cnc,ludgeRobertL. k''.'....':> WilkinsO=U.S.DistrictCourt

-''

' ou=chambersofHonorable

RobertL.Wilkins,

, email=RW@dc.uscourt.gov,

. cztjs

* tl,/.)u' '. . Date:2O13.10.0919:38:22

* -04'00d

Hon.RobcrtL. ilkins

Judge,U.S.DistrictCourtforthe

D istrictofColum bia

ECF

DOCUM ENT

Iherebyattzstandcertifythatthisis4printedcopyofa

documentwhlch*.selectronicaly fled withthe United

State:Distrld and Bankruptcy Courtsforthe OistrttQf

CDoiumbia. 4O 2ol

ateFded:

GELA D.CAE ,CLERK

By: &

Case 1:20-mc-22804-BB Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/08/2020 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-22728-KMW Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/03/2020 Page 1 of 2
0

7 '

&

r

>

J

K

$ 1

r l O

$ P c,

)

X c G 

O w

'%

1

%T A'&

= oyv #

t

r*

$ R

M W

+

<

P

)' -r 'T1

* ' o ' 8 c

/ x C

& / C4

m Y

7- S

* @

o o

&

Case 1:20-cv-22728-KMW Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/03/2020 Page 2 of 2
(No. 1119

Claimant awarded $1,500.00.)

#### Martin Cannon, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 10, 1927.*

Pees & *salaries*— when *award may he made.*This case is controlled by the decision of the court in Blast v. *State, supra.*

Harry Smitz, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Merrill P. Wehmhoff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

Martin Cannon presents a claim against the State on account of a deficiency in salary, allotted to the chief inspector in the Division of Private Employment Agencies in the Department of Labor, for deputy hire, said claimant being a deputy in said service. It appears that the General Assembly in making the appropriation for the salaries in question, did not take into consideration that the law enacted contains a provision as follows: “If the deputy inspector has served or hereafter serves more than one year, $100 shall be added to his salary for each year of service until a maximum salary of $3,000 is reached,” and that no allowance for such increase in salary is made in the law.

The Attorney General of the State of Illinois has filed a demurrer, which is sustained as a matter of law.

George B. Arnold, Director of Labor of the State of Illinois, has recommended that this deficiency be awarded to the employee.

We accordingly award to the claimant the sum of $1,500.00.
LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY F. SANCHEZ, P.A. 

6701 SUNSET DRIVE, SUITE 101, MIAMI, FL, 33143 • TELEPHONE (305) 665-9211

PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW RE: “ISSUE TO BE BRIEFED” NO. 8

Issue No. 8: Whether the verdict form should include a special interrogatory asking 

the jury to determine if an employer is entitled to a tip credit or if the tip pool was 

valid/invalid (or questions about how the tip pool was invalidated)? Alternatively, 

if (after conferring) the parties agree that these types of questions do not need to be 

included in the verdict form, then the parties may state so in their submission

A. There is no controlling authority requiring or precluding such special 

interrogatories regarding the invalidity of the tip pool occasioned by the 

employers’ improper use of employee tips.

There is no controlling authority requiring or prohibiting the verdict form including special 

interrogatories on the issue of the Employers’ having invalidated the Tip Pool by improperly using 

tips. The evidence supports that the Employers improperly used the Plaintiffs’ tips in many ways. 

For example, their own records reflect the systematic disbursement of less than all tips; they 

required Plaintiffs participate and contribute to an invalid “tip pool” which included workers who 

were (for various and sundry reasons) not eligible to participate because, inter alia, they were 

undocumented workers and therefore ineligible to work, because they were in large measure not 

engaged in tip-producing work, because they were managers, because they were not contributors

to the tip pool, but only drawers from it, because the employer used the tips to pay for “contract” 

labor and other Employer overhead or operating costs, such as credit card charges, and other 

purposes inconsistent with the requirement that employees retain all of their tips and that 

employers not keep employee tips for any purpose. Interrogatories addressed to the many ways 

the employer improperly invaded the Plaintiffs’ right to keep all of their tips could risk confusing 

the jury. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs would suggest that such interrogatory or interrogatories be 

simple and limited as suggested in the following section. Moreover, Plaintiffs reserve the right to 

propose other interrogatories or jury instructions at any time prior to the conclusion of their 

deliberations, or other time within the Court’s discretion. In this regard, we note that a Charging 

Conference is scheduled for August 29, 2023, two weeks before trial.

Case 1:20-cv-22603-JG Document 194-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

B. Special interrogatories.

1. Do You find that the Defendant Grill Enterprises improperly used or kept 

tips belonging to Plaintiff Erik Chavez

Yes ________ No _________

2. Do You find that the Defendant Grill Enterprises improperly used or kept 

tips belonging to Plaintiff Leo Diaz

Yes ________ No _________

Case 1:20-cv-22603-JG Document 194-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2023 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5298 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5298

   To provide the Under Secretary for Science and Technology of the 
   Department of Homeland Security with the authority to temporarily 
 extend the duration of protections provided under the SAFETY Act, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 19, 2022

 Mr. Peters (for himself, Mr. Portman, and Mrs. Capito) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide the Under Secretary for Science and Technology of the 
   Department of Homeland Security with the authority to temporarily 
 extend the duration of protections provided under the SAFETY Act, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``qualified anti-
terrorism technology'' has the meaning given the term in section 865 of 
the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 665).
    (b) Extension.--During fiscal year 2023, the Under Secretary for 
Science and Technology of the Department of Homeland Security may 
temporarily extend the duration of protections provided under the 
system of risk management set forth in subtitle G of title VIII of the 
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 441 et seq.) to a qualified 
anti-terrorism technology if the Under Secretary determines that--
            (1) an application for the renewal of such protections was 
        submitted not later than 165 days before the date of the 
        expiration of such protections; and
            (2) such application for renewal was complete upon 
        submission.
    (c) Rule of Construction.--A determination by the Under Secretary 
to temporarily extend protections to a qualified anti-terrorism 
technology pursuant to the authority provided by subsection (b) may not 
be construed to preclude or otherwise limit the authority of the Under 
Secretary to ultimately approve or deny the application for renewal of 
such protections.
                                 <all>
```