alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-CV-61208-RKA

SIMPLIFIED IMAGING & DIAGNOSTICS,

SIMPIFIED IMAGING SOLUTIONS LLC

d/b/a IMAGING SOLUTI8ONS (SIS),

Plaintiffs,

vs.

PETER ROUVELAS, M.D., P.C.,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COME NOW the undersigned counsel and file this Notice of Appearance as counsel of

record for Defendant Peter Rouvelas, M.D., P.C., in the above styled proceedings, having been

retained for this purpose. Defendant Dr. Rouvelas waives no defenses or objections by making

this filing. The undersigned requests that all pleadings and papers in this matter be served on

counsel for Defendant Peter Rouvelas, M.D., P.C., at the following address:

LANCE O. LEIDER, J.D., LL.M.

Florida Bar No.: 96408

Primary E-mail: LLeider@TheHealthLawFirm.com

Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

TRIAL COUNSEL/LEAD ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

GEORGE F. INDEST III, J.D., M.P.A., LL.M.

Florida Bar No.: 382426

Primary e-mail: GIndest@TheHealthLawFirm.com

Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

TRIAL COUNSEL/LEAD ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

CAROLE C. SCHRIEFER, J.D.

Florida Bar No.: 835293

Case 0:20-cv-61208-RKA Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 1 of 2
Primary e-mail: CSchriefer@thehealthlawfirm.com

Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

TRIAL COUNSEL/LEAD ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

THE HEALTH LAW FIRM, P.A.

1101 Douglas Avenue, Suite 1000

Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714

Telephone: (407) 331-6620

Telefax: (407) 331-3030

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

PETER ROUVELAS, M.D., P.C.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have filed this document electronically with the Clerk of

Court via the CM/ECF System, which automatically serves all counsel of record, this 17th day

of July 2020.

/s/ George F. Indest III

__________________________________________

LANCE O. LEIDER, J.D., LL.M.

Florida Bar No.: 96408

Primary E-mail: LLeider@TheHealthLawFirm.com

Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

TRIAL COUNSEL/LEAD ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

GEORGE F. INDEST III, J.D., M.P.A., LL.M.

Florida Bar No.: 382426

Primary e-mail: GIndest@TheHealthLawFirm.com

Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

TRIAL COUNSEL/LEAD ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

CAROLE C. SCHRIEFER, J.D.

Florida Bar No.: 835293

Primary e-mail: CSchriefer@thehealthlawfirm.com

Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

TRIAL COUNSEL/LEAD ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

PETER ROUVELAS, M.D., P.C.

GFI/pa - S:\2600-2699\2670\001\410-Pleadings-Drafts & Finals\Notice of Appearance.wpd

- 2 -

Case 0:20-cv-61208-RKA Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 2 of 2
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129716 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129716 

 COA: 261014 

Oakland CC: 1999-169670-FC 

PETER RODRIGUEZ APONTE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 21, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p0123 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 30, 2006 

Clerk
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe MANTA: An RPV design to investigate forces and moments on a lifting surfaceThe overall goal was to investigate and exploit the advantages of using remotely powered vehicles (RPV's) for in-flight data collection at low Reynold's numbers. The data to be collected is on actual flight loads for any type of rectangular or tapered airfoil section, including vertical and horizontal stabilizers. The data will be on a test specimen using a force-balance system which is located forward of the aircraft to insure an undisturbed air flow over the test section. The collected data of the lift, drag and moment of the test specimen is to be radioed to a grand receiver, thus providing real-time data acquisition. The design of the mission profile and the selection of the instrumentation to satisfy aerodynamic requirements are studied and tested. A half-size demonstrator was constructed and flown to test the flight worthiness of the system.Document ID19900011655Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBryan, Kevin*(Notre Dame Univ. IN, United States)*Soutar, John*(Notre Dame Univ. IN, United States)*Witty, Peter*(Notre Dame Univ. IN, United States)*Mediate, Bruno*(Notre Dame Univ. IN, United States)*Quast, Thomas*(Notre Dame Univ. IN, United States)*Combs, Dan*(Notre Dame Univ. IN, United States)*Schubert, Martin*(Notre Dame Univ. IN, United States)*Condron, David*(Notre Dame Univ. IN, United States)*Taylor, Scott*(Notre Dame Univ. IN, United States)*Garino, ED*(Notre Dame Univ. IN, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186227NASA-CR-186227Accession Number90N20971Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-4435Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900011655.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 200 (Monday, October 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23291]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Performance Review Board

    As required by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-
454), Chairman Michael K. Powell appointed the following executives to 
the Performance Review Board: Julius Knapp, Renee Licht, Mary Beth 
Richards, and David Solomon.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-23291 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
No: 23-037 July 6, 2023

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Publishes Annual Report to Congress on Nuclear Security Inspections

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has made public an unclassified version of its 

annual report to Congress on the results of the agency’s security inspection activities in 2022.

The report covers the NRC’s security inspection program, including force-on-force 

exercises, for commercial nuclear power reactors and “Category I” fuel cycle facilities. These 

facilities manufacture fuel for government reactors and process uranium for commercial reactors. 

The report keeps Congress and the public informed of the NRC’s efforts to oversee the 

protection of the nation’s civilian nuclear power infrastructure and strategic special nuclear 

material. 

The NRC conducted 193 security inspections at commercial nuclear power plants and 

Category I fuel cycle facilities last year. The inspections included 19 full triennial force-on-force 

inspections at nuclear power plants and one at a Category I fuel cycle facility. Force-on-force 

inspections involve simulated attacks to test the effectiveness of a licensee’s physical protection 

program. The publicly available inspection results are discussed in the report. 

When NRC inspectors make a security finding, they ensure the licensee corrects the 

situation in a timely manner. Details of security findings are considered sensitive and not 

released to the public.
Exhibit 32.1

Statement

Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the
undersigned officer of Appleton Papers Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                      |  |                                                
|--------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                      |  | APPLETON PAPERS INC.
|                      |  |                     
|Dated: March 17, 2006 |  |                      |  |                                                
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ Mark R. Richards
|                      |  | Name:                |  | Mark R. Richards                               
|                      |  | Title:               |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato by order of that court of 19 April 2005 in Centro Europa 7 Srl v Ministero delle Comunicazioni e Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Direzione Generale Autorizzazioni e Concessioni Ministero delle Comunicazioni

(Case C-380/05)

(2006/C 10/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Consiglio di Stato of 19 April 2005, received at the Court Registry on 18 October 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Centro Europa 7 Srl and Ministero delle Comunicazioni (Ministry of Communications) e Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, (Authority for Security of Communications) Direzione Generale Autorizzazioni e Concessioni Ministero delle Comunicazioni (Directorate General for Authorisations and Concessions in the Ministry for Communications) on the following questions:

----

(1)OJ L 108, de 24.4.2002, p. 21.

(2)OJ L 108, de 24.4.2002, p. 33.

(3)OJ L 249, de 17.9.2002, p. 21.

----
### §114. North Dakota

North Dakota constitutes one judicial district.

Court shall be held at Bismarck, Fargo, Grand Forks, and Minot.

(Added Pub. L. 111–174, §3, May 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 1216.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 114, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 886; Pub. L. 95–408, §3(b), Oct. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 883, which provided that North Dakota consisted of one judicial district comprising four divisions, was repealed by Pub. L. 111–174, §3, May 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 1216.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGE AVILA-AVILA; AZUCENA

MEZA-ARCINIEGA,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-72962

Agency Nos. A097-856-033

 A097-856-034

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 10, 2011** 

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Jorge Avila-Avila and Azucena Meza-Arciniega, husband and wife and

natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings based

on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

FILED

JAN 18 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-72962

We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de

novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings, including

claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785,

791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen because they failed to establish the required prejudice. See Rojas-Garcia v.

Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir. 2003) (to prevail on an ineffective assistance

of counsel claim, a petitioner must demonstrate prejudice). 

Counsel’s August 30, 2010, motion to withdraw is granted.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-55 June 18, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC FINES MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY $2,750

FOR DELIBERATE VIOLATIONS OF NRC REQUIREMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $2,750 fine against Materials

Testing Laboratory, Inc. for deliberate violations of NRC requirements.

Materials Testing, based in New Hyde Park, N.Y., holds an NRC license allowing it to

use nuclear measuring gauges at temporary job sites in areas where NRC maintains

jurisdiction, including Connecticut, Delaware and New Jersey. The company has branch offices

in Newington, Conn., Dover, Del., and Edison, N.J.

NRC has determined that a former company vice president deliberately allowed at

least one field technician to use a nuclear gauge without being properly certified and without

wearing appropriate dosimetry. It based this finding on an investigation begun last July and on

additional information provided by the company.

In reaching its enforcement decision, the NRC evaluated the company’s corrective

actions, determining they were “prompt and comprehensive.” These measures include

demotion of the vice president and his removal from any involvement in overseeing the

radioactive materials program; reviews of all dosimetry reports; and review of the certifications

for all technicians. In a letter to the company forwarding the notice of violation, NRC Region I

Administrator Hubert J. Miller said the civil penalty would have been higher had these corrective

measures not been taken.

In addition, the NRC has issued a Notice of Violation to the former vice president, John

Chmielorz, for deliberately causing the Materials Testing Laboratory to violate NRC

requirements. No fine is proposed.

Both the company and the individual have 30 days to contest this enforcement action.

#
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-191 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-191 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of 2
From:  Beardsley, Michelle <Michelle.Beardsley@nrc.gov> 

Sent:  Tuesday, July 30, 2019 2:24 PM 

To:  gonzalo.perez@cdph.ca.gov 

Cc:  Scott, Phillip (CDPH‐RHB) 

Subject:  Corrected copy of California State Regulation Status sheet 

Attachments:  CA corrected STATE REGULATION STATUS sheet.pdf 

Dear Mr. Perez: 

In accordance with the email from Phillip Scott dated July 30, 2019, please find attached the 

corrected copy of California’s State Regulation Status sheet. Please review to ensure it is 

correct. I apologize for any inconvenience. 

Regards, 

Michelle 

Michelle Beardsley, Health Physicist 

State Regulation Review Coordinator 

State Agreement and Liaison Programs Branch

Division of Materials Safety, Security, State, and Tribal Programs 

Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

301‐415‐0275 

michelle.beardsley@nrc.gov
§ 208.10 Other regulations. The following provisions of title 44 CFR, Chapter I also apply to the program in this part: ( a ) Section 206.9, which deals with the non-liability of DHS in certain circumstances.
( b ) Section 206.11, which prescribes nondiscrimination in the provision of disaster assistance.
( c ) Section 206.14, which deals with criminal and civil penalties.
( d ) Section 206.15, which permits recovery of assistance by DHS.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 1

**Question 1:** If a licensee decides to implement Part 20 in mid-year, how does the licensee treat the annual dose limits? Prorated? Add contributions from beginning of year before the revised Part 20 was adopted?

**Answer:** The licensee must define the "year" consistent with the definition in 10 CFR 20.1003. If a licensee intends to implement the revised Part 20 at any time other than the beginning of the year, the licensee must subtract the dose received for the current year prior to the revised Part 20 dose being adopted from the revised Part 20 dose limit. The difference need not be prorated. For example, assume a licensee adopts the revised Part 20 on July 1, 1992, and defines its dose year as January 1 - December 31.

If the worker had received 1.5 rems between January 1 and June 30, 1992, he or she would have (5 - 1.5) = 3.5 rems available for the remainder of the year. If the worker already has more than 5 rem (e.g., two 3-rem quarters), the licensee must shift the worker to tasks in which the worker will receive no occupational radiation exposure. 

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1003)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-960-1910-BJ-4489; ES-052439, Group No. 26, Illinois]


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plat of survey; Illinois.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers.
    The lands we surveyed are:

Third Principal Meridian, Illinois

T. 4 N., R. 9 W.

    The plat of survey represents the survey of an amended portion of 
the Locks and Dam No. 27 acquisition boundary, in Township 4 North, 
Range 9 West, of the Third Principal Meridian, in the State of 
Illinois, and was accepted on September 22, 2004.
    We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It 
will be made available to the public as a matter of information.

    Dated: September 22, 2004.
Stephen D. Douglas,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 04-22807 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
### §6338. Certificate of sale; deed of real property

#### (a) Certificate of sale

In the case of property sold as provided in section 6335, the Secretary shall give to the purchaser a certificate of sale upon payment in full of the purchase price. In the case of real property, such certificate shall set forth the real property purchased, for whose taxes the same was sold, the name of the purchaser, and the price paid therefor.

#### (b) Deed to real property

In the case of any real property sold as provided in section 6335 and not redeemed in the manner and within the time provided in section 6337, the Secretary shall execute (in accordance with the laws of the State in which such real property is situated pertaining to sales of real property under execution) to the purchaser of such real property at such sale, upon his surrender of the certificate of sale, a deed of the real property so purchased by him, reciting the facts set forth in the certificate.

#### (c) Real property purchased by United States

If real property is declared purchased by the United States at a sale pursuant to section 6335, the Secretary shall at the proper time execute a deed therefor; and without delay cause such deed to be duly recorded in the proper registry of deeds.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 787; Pub. L. 85–866, title I, §78, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1662; Pub. L. 89–719, title I, §104(f), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1137; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.

1966—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 89–719 struck out provisions requiring the endorsement of approval as to the form of the deed by the United States Attorney for the district in which the property is situated.

1958—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 85–866 struck out "district" before "attorney".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1966 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 89–719 applicable after Nov. 2, 1966, regardless of when title or lien of United States arose or when lien or interest of another person was acquired, with certain exceptions, see section 114(a)–(c) of Pub. L. 89–719, set out as a note under section 6323 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1958 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 85–866 effective Aug. 17, 1954, see section 1(c)(2) of Pub. L. 85–866, set out as a note under section 165 of this title.