alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 402.9 Contracts.

A contract in form approved by the Commissioner shall be signed by the purchaser at the time of sale and executed on behalf of the United States by the Commissioner. A copy of the contract shall be furnished to the appropriate land office of the Bureau of Land Management for entering in the tract books. The contract shall contain a description of the land to be sold, the price and terms of sale, a full statement by the purchaser respecting his qualifications, including citizenship, a description by the purchaser of his present holdings, and a statement by him of the irrigable acreage of those holdings. The contract shall also contain a statement by the purchaser with respect to his knowledge as to whether the land is mineral or non-mineral in character, as well as all appropriate reservations, mineral and otherwise, required by law to be made on entries and patents. Assignments of contracts may be made only with the consent of the Commissioner and to persons legally qualified to be purchasers.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5031 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 

study of the site known as ‘‘Dearfield’’ in the State of Colorado. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 

Mr. HICKENLOOPER (for himself and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

special resource study of the site known as ‘‘Dearfield’’ 

in the State of Colorado. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dearfield Study Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

6 In this Act: 

7 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

8 the Secretary of the Interior. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5031 IS

1 (2) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 

2 means the site known as ‘‘Dearfield’’, in Weld Coun3 ty, Colorado, which was a historically black agricul4 tural settlement founded by Oliver Toussaint Jack5 son. 

6 SEC. 3. DEARFIELD SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a 

8 special resource study of the study area. 

9 (b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub10 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

11 (1) evaluate the national significance of the 

12 study area; 

13 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

14 designating the study area as a unit of the National 

15 Park System; 

16 (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 

17 protection, and interpretation of the study area by 

18 the Federal Government, State or local government 

19 entities, or private and nonprofit organizations; 

20 (4) consult with interested Federal agencies, 

21 State or local governmental entities, private and 

22 nonprofit organizations, or any other interested indi23 viduals; and 

24 (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal ac25 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5031 IS

1 maintenance associated with the alternatives de2 scribed in paragraphs (2) and (3). 

3 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

4 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with sec5 tion 100507 of title 54, United States Code. 

6 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

7 on which funds are first made available to carry out the 

8 study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to 

9 the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep10 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

11 Resources of the Senate a report that describes— 

12 (1) the results of the study; and 

13 (2) any conclusions and recommendations of the 

14 Secretary. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-22778-UU

VICTOR ARIZA,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AZTECA RESTAURANT ENTERPRISES,

INC.,

Defendant. 

 /

 

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the parties’ Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 

With Prejudice. D.E. 12. The Court having considered the pertinent portions of the record and 

being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case 

is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all parties and all claims, with each party bearing 

its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Miami, Florida, this _13th_ day of August, 2020.

__________________________________

URSULA UNGARO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished:

All counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-22778-UU Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 1 of 1
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

DeCurtis LLC, Plaintiff,

v.

Carnival Corporation, Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-22945-Civ-Scola

_______________________________________________________________________________

Carnival Corporation, Plaintiff,

v.

DeCurtis Corporation and DeCurtis 

LLC, Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

Consol. Case No. 20-21547-Civ-Scola

Order Adopting Report and Recommendations

The Court referred Carnival Corporation’s motion to dismiss or, 

alternatively, to strike DeCurtis Corporation and DeCurtis LLC’s (together, 

“DeCurtis”) counterclaims and affirmative defenses (ECF No. 160) to United 

States Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for a report and recommendations. 

Judge Torres has issued a report, recommending that Carnival’s motion be 

denied in its entirety. (Rep. & Rec., ECF No. 260.) No objections have been filed 

and the time to do so has passed. Having considered Judge Torres’s report, the 

record, and the relevant legal authorities, the Court finds Judge Torres’s report 

and recommendation cogent and compelling.

The Court therefore affirms and adopts Judge Torres’s report and 

recommendations (ECF No. 260), thus denying Carnival’s motion in its 

entirety (ECF No. 160). Carnival must answer DeCurtis’s counterclaims on or 

before March 11, 2022.

Done and ordered at Miami, Florida, on March 3, 2022.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 263 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2022 Page 1 of 1
Second Department,

July, 1943.

(July 8, 1943.)

#### In the Matter of the Application of Jacob Siegfried for Reinstatement as an Attorney.

Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

PITAC's Subcommittee on Computational Science will provide an update of its activities. PITAC will discuss the Subcommittee's presentation and provide guidance for use in the completion of its report on computational science. Public input will be solicited during a public comment period. A small fraction of the meeting time may be allocated for other PITAC updates at the discretion of the co-chairs and the designated Federal officer.

# DATES:

Thursday, November 4, 2004, 1:30-3:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

# ADDRESSES:

Via teleconference, the Internet, or at Noesis, Inc., 4100 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, Virginia.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This meeting will be held primarily via a teleconference and the Internet (through the Webex application). In addition, the public is invited to participate in this meeting in-person at Noesis, Inc. in Arlington, Virginia. Detailed information about this meeting, including the agenda and details concerning registration for in-person or remote participation, will be posted at PITAC's Web site (                    *http://www.nitrd.gov/​pitac*) no later than October 20th. Meeting information may also be obtained by calling 703-292-4873. Members of the public who wish to participate using the Internet (Webex) must register by Monday, November 1st.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Alan Inouye at the National Coordination Office for Information Technology Research and Development at 703-292-4873 or by email at                         *inouye@nitrd.gov*.                    

Dated: October 12, 2004.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 04-23249  Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-6-M
### [§6698A. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–223, title IV, §401(a), Apr. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 299]

Section, added Pub. L. 94–455, title XX, §2005(d)(2), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1878, §6694; renumbered §6698 and amended Pub. L. 95–600, title VII, §702(r)(1)(A), (B), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2938; renumbered §6698A, Pub. L. 96–222, title I, §107(a)(2)(D), Apr. 1, 1980, 94 Stat. 223, related to failure of an executor to file information with respect to carryover basis property. Repeal was achieved by repealing section 2005(d)(2) of Pub. L. 94–455 and section 702(r)(1)(A), (B) of Pub. L. 95–600 and the amendments made by those sections.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal and Revival of Prior Law

Repeal applicable in respect of decedents dying after Dec. 31, 1976, and, except for certain elections, this title to be applied and administered as if this section had not been enacted, see section 401(b), (e) of Pub. L. 96–223, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment and Revival of Prior Law note under section 1023 of this title.
CSPA	Recommendation	for	Aerosol	

Sector	Definitions	for	EPA	SNAP	Proposal

4/7/14 Draft

All definitions apply only to provisions to remove SNAP listing for materials with 

Global Warming Potential (GWP) greater than 150 for Consumer Aerosols.

Consumer Aerosol: An aerosol product sold for use by household and/or 

institutional consumers that is not a Medical Aerosol or Technical Aerosol as 

defined below.

Medical Aerosol: An aerosol product that is classified as a drug for human or 

animal use by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration.

Technical Aerosol: An aerosol product designed to accomplish a specific set of 

tasks that requires high-GWP propellants to assure non-flammability for user 

safety or to must meet specific regulatory requirements.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5255 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5255

     To streamline the budget process at the Department of Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2022

 Ms. Warren (for herself, Mr. Braun, Mr. Lee, and Mr. King) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                           on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To streamline the budget process at the Department of Defense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Streamline Pentagon Budgeting Act of 
2022''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO UNFUNDED 
              PRIORITIES.

    Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by repealing section 222a;
            (2) by repealing section 222b; and
            (3) in the table of sections at the beginning of the 
        chapter, by striking the items relating to sections 222a and 
        222b.
                                 <all>
```
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="cp:revision" content="3">
<meta name="extended-properties:AppVersion" content="12.0000">
<meta name="meta:paragraph-count" content="1">
<meta name="meta:word-count" content="64">
<meta name="extended-properties:Application" content="Microsoft Office Word">
<meta name="meta:last-author" content="creagan">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="creagan">
<meta name="extended-properties:Company" content=" ">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="2010-07-13T19:58:00Z">
<meta name="meta:line-count" content="3">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="2010-07-13T20:15:00Z">
<meta name="meta:character-count" content="369">
<meta name="extended-properties:Template" content="Normal">
<meta name="meta:character-count-with-spaces" content="432">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.microsoft.ooxml.OOXMLParser">
<meta name="extended-properties:DocSecurityString" content="None">
<meta name="extended-properties:TotalTime" content="5">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="10587">
<meta name="meta:page-count" content="1">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document">
<meta name="dc:publisher" content=" ">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><p class="no_Spacing">Memorandum</p>
<p class="no_Spacing">To:  	Docket Number 2010-1</p>
<p class="no_Spacing"></p>
<p class="no_Spacing">From:   Timothy Creagan</p>
<p class="no_Spacing">Senior Accessibility Specialist</p>
<p class="no_Spacing">U.S. Access Board</p>
<p class="no_Spacing"></p>
<p class="no_Spacing">RE:  Ex Parte Meeting</p>
<p class="no_Spacing"></p>
<p class="no_Spacing">Date:  June 2, 2010 </p>
<p class="no_Spacing"></p>
<p class="no_Spacing">On June 2, 2010, representatives of IBM held a conference call with Access Board staff members to discuss questions about the ICT ANPRM.  Present on the call were Andi Snow-Weaver, Rich Schwerdtfager of IBM, and Access Board Staff members Bruce Bailey, and Timothy Creagan.</p>
</body></html>
No: II-23-016 May 11, 2023

Contact: Dave Gasperson, 404-997-4417

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss

Harris Nuclear Power Plant Performance

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold an open house May 17 to discuss the 

2022 safety performance of the Shearon Harris nuclear power plant. The single-unit Harris plant is 

located in New Hill, North Carolina, and operated by Duke Energy.

The event will run from 6-7 p.m. Eastern time at the New Hill Community Center, 

3101 New Hill Holleman Road, in New Hill. NRC employees responsible for plant inspections, 

including the resident inspectors based full-time at the site, will be available to answer questions at 

the meeting.

NRC resident inspectors and other specialist inspectors from the NRC Region II office in 

Atlanta perform inspections at the Harris plant. They concluded that Harris operated safely in 2022, 

and all inspection findings and performance indicators were green or of very low safety 

significance. As a result, the plant remains under the NRC’s normal level of oversight, which entails 

thousands of hours of inspection each year.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or 

performance indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC 

oversight.

The annual assessment letter for the Harris plant, including upcoming inspection plans, is 

available on the NRC website. Current performance information for both units is available on the 

NRC website and updated quarterly.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-22880-Civ-COOKE/GOODMAN

JOSHUA J. LOPEZ, and other similarly-situated individuals,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DADE COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS MATTER is before me upon U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman’s

Report and Recommendations on FLSA Settlement (“Report”) (ECF No. 25). The Court 

referred the parties’ Joint Motion to Approve FLSA Settlement (“Motion”) (ECF No. 20) to 

Judge Goodman pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). See ECF No. 21. 

Judge Goodman recommends I find the parties’ settlement agreement to be fair and 

reasonable, approve the settlement, and dismiss this action with prejudice. Judge Goodman 

also recommends this Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties’ 

settlement. Neither party objected to Judge Goodman’s Report and Recommendation and 

the time to do so has passed. After reviewing the Motion, Judge Goodman’s Report, and 

the Settlement Agreement in accordance with Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 

F.2d 1350 (11th Cir. 1982), I find Judge Goodman’s Report clear, cogent, and compelling. 

Accordingly, Judge Goodman’s Report (ECF No. 25) is AFFIRMED and 

ADOPTED as Order of this Court. It is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Court GRANTS the parties’ Joint Motion to Approve FLSA Settlement (ECF 

No. 20);

2. The Parties’ Settlement Agreement is APPROVED;

3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and

4. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

Case 1:20-cv-22880-MGC Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE and ORDERED in chambers, at Miami, Florida, this 23rd day of November 

2020.

Copies furnished to:

Jonathan Goodman, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-22880-MGC Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §100. Maryland

Maryland constitutes one judicial district comprising two divisions.

(1) The Northern Division comprises the counties of Allegany, Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Caroline, Carroll, Cecil, Dorchester, Frederick, Garrett, Harford, Howard, Kent, Queen Anne's, Somerset, Talbot, Washington, Wicomico, and Worcester, and the City of Baltimore.

Court for the Northern Division shall be held at Baltimore, Cumberland, and Denton.

(2) The Southern Division comprises the counties of Calvert, Charles, Montgomery, Prince George's, and St. Mary's.

Court for the Southern Division shall be held at a suitable site in Montgomery or Prince George's County not more than five miles from the boundary of Montgomery and Prince George's Counties.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 882; Pub. L. 91–546, §4, Dec. 14, 1970, 84 Stat. 1412; Pub. L. 100–487, §1, Oct. 14, 1988, 102 Stat. 2431.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §166 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §86, 36 Stat. 1114; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 422, 43 Stat. 1106).

Provisions relating to appointment of a deputy clerk and a deputy marshal and the maintenance of offices by such deputies were omitted as covered by sections 541 [see 561], 542 [see 561], and 751 of this title.

The provisions respecting court accommodations at Denton were omitted as covered by section 142 of this title.

Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–702 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section provided that Maryland constituted one judicial district and that court be held at Baltimore, Cumberland, Denton, and at a suitable site in Prince Georges County not more than five miles from the boundary of Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties.

1970—Pub. L. 91–546 added a suitable site in Prince Georges County not more than five miles from the boundary of Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties to the list of enumerated places for holding court in Maryland.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Pub. L. 100–487, §2, Oct. 14, 1988, 102 Stat. 2431, provided that:

"(a) In General.—This Act and the amendments made by this Act [amending this section] shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 14, 1988].

"(b) Pending Cases Not Affected.—This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall not affect any action commenced before the effective date of this Act and pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland on such date.

"(c) Juries Not Affected.—This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall not affect the composition, or preclude the service, of any grand or petit jury summoned, empaneled, or actually serving in the Judicial District of Maryland on the effective date of this Act."
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the 12 months ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Charles N. Martin, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

            (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                        of the Exchange Act; and

            (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Charles N. Martin, Jr.                      Charles N. Martin, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerSeptember 19, 2007