UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 2:20-cv-14251-KMM

ANDRES T. ANDRES, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WILLIAM BARR, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (“Mot.”) 

(ECF No. 10). Therein, Defendants have moved to dismiss pro se Plaintiffs’ Complaint (ECF No. 

1) for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Mot. at 10. The Court referred the matter to

the Honorable Shaniek M. Maynard, United States Magistrate Judge (ECF Nos. 2, 9), who issued 

a Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendants’ Motion be GRANTED. (“R&R”) 

(ECF No. 13). The Parties did not file objections to the R&R and the time to do so has passed. 

The matter is now ripe for review. As set forth below, the Court ADOPTS the R&R.

The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 

recommendations made by the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). 

As set forth in the R&R, Magistrate Judge Maynard makes the following findings: (1) 

Plaintiffs failed to respond to Defendants’ Motion within fourteen days; (2) Plaintiffs again failed 

to respond, even after they were cautioned that failure to respond may result in dismissal; and (3) 

as of the date of the R&R, Plaintiffs had not filed a response. R&R at 2. 

“A court may dismiss a case where the plaintiff fails to prosecute it or comply with a court 

order.” R&R at 3 (citing Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. v. Fla. Mowing And Landscape Serv., 

Case 2:20-cv-14251-KMM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

Inc., 556 F.3d 1232, 1240 (11th Cir. 2009)). “A court has the authority to dismiss a case 

based on Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the court’s inherent power to 

manage its own docket.” Id. (citing Betty K Agencies, Ltd. v. M/V MONADA, 432 F.3d 1333, 1337 

(11th Cir. 2005)). “Pro se plaintiffs, like any other litigants, are responsible for following 

court orders and are subject to the same sanctions.” Id. (citing Martins v. Royal Caribbean 

Cruises, Ltd., 429 F. Supp. 3d 1315, 1323 (S.D. Fla. 2019)).

Here, Magistrate Judge Maynard found that Plaintiffs have failed to prosecute their case 

and comply with court orders. Id. Additionally, Magistrate Judge Maynard noted that “Plaintiffs 

have not filed anything in this case since filing the complaint in July 2020.” Id. For these reasons, 

Magistrate Judge Maynard recommended that: (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss be granted, and 

(2) Plaintiffs’ Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Id. The Court agrees.

Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the R&R, the pertinent portions of the record, 

and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that 

the R&R (ECF No. 13) is ADOPTED, Defendants’ Motion (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED, and the

above-captioned case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is 

INSTRUCTED to CLOSE this case. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this ____ day of May, 2021. 

K. MICHAEL MOORE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

c: All counsel of record

21st

Case 2:20-cv-14251-KMM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2021 Page 2 of 2