alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, James F. Verhey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Kaiser Ventures LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this amended annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this amended report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                               
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2006 |  | /s/ James F. Verhey           
|                     |  | James F. Verhey               
|                     |  | Executive Vice President & CFO
§ 314.8 Recorded statement for Project Real Property. ( a ) For all Projects involving the acquisition, construction, or improvement of a building, as determined by EDA, the Recipient shall execute a lien, covenant, or other statement of the Federal Interest in such Project Real Property. The statement shall specify the Estimated Useful Life of the Project and shall include, but not be limited to, the Disposition, encumbrance and Federal Share requirements. The statement shall be satisfactory in form and substance to EDA.
( b ) The statement of the Federal Interest must be perfected and placed of record in the Real Property records of the jurisdiction in which the Project Real Property is located, all in accordance with applicable law.
( c ) Facilities in which the EDA Investment is only a small part of a large project, as determined by EDA, may be exempted from the requirements of this section.
( d ) In extraordinary circumstances and at EDA's sole discretion, EDA may choose to accept another instrument to protect the Federal Interest in Project Real Property, such as an escrow agreement or letter of credit, provided that EDA determines such instrument is adequate and a recorded statement in accord with paragraph (a) of this section is not reasonably available. The terms and provisions of the relevant instrument shall be satisfactory to EDA in EDA's sole judgment. The costs and fees for escrow services and letters of credit shall be paid by the Recipient.
[71 FR 56675, Sept. 27, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 76138, Dec. 19, 2014; 82 FR 57061, Dec. 1, 2017]
TELEPHONE CONTACT SUMMARY

Brick and Structural Clay Products

FROM: Kristin Sroka

RTI International

DATE OF CONTACT: May 6, 2015

PERSON/ORGANIZATION CONTACTED: Mary Ann Keon, Environmental Di rector, Boral Industries Inc.

200 Mansell Court East Suite 305, Roswell, Georgia 30076

Phone 770-645-4529

PURPOSE OF CONTACT: To obtain additional information on the test results for the tunnel kiln at the Gleason, Tennessee facility.

SUMMARY OF CONTACT:

Ms. Keon was contacted for information regarding the PM emissions results

obtained from a 1998 stack test on tunnel kiln ES02, and to request any more recent data that the company may have for this kiln. Ms. Keon indicated that her records did not show anything obviously unique about the operati on of the kiln during that test, but she

also indicated that the test was so old that the records easily available to her at the company’s headquarters were somewhat limited. She did note that this facility is unique in that it uses ball clay as a raw material. She also stated that the kiln had not been tested for PM since 1998; although the facility was on the list for testing under the EPA’s 2010 CAA section 114 survey due to the use of ba ll clay raw materials, the kilns were not operating at the time and were not tested. K iln ES02 is still not ope rating, so no new tests were planned.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 402

**Question 402:** NRC Form 5 (Item No. 21, "Comments") implies that dose from a "hot particle" should be added to the shallow dose equivalent, maximum extremity (SDE, ME - Block 14). However, I&E Notice 90-48 states that "hot particle exposure will not be added to skin doses from sources other than hot particles."
> 
(a) Should hot particle doses be added to the shallow dose equivalent as implied?

(b) If so, should this dose be subtracted from the applicable dose category with regard to remaining available shallow dose equivalent (skin or extremity) for the year? Based on our understanding of the intent of I&E Notice 90-48, we believe that "hot particle" doses should not be ubtracted from the remaining available shallow dose equivalent (skin or extremity) for the year.

**Answer:** The intent of the "hot particle" example in the instructions for Item 21 on Form 5 is simply to give one an example of how this space on the form might be used. There is no intention to imply that hot particle doses should be added to other doses.The question of adding hot particle skin poses to other skin doses was addressed in IE Information Notice 90-48, "Enforcement policy for Hot Particle Exposures," and the enforcement policy enclosed with that notice, and in Health Physics Position (HPPOS) 246 (in NUREG / CR-5569). The NRC policy and staff positions in these documents have not been changed by revised Part 20 or the instructions for Form 5 in Regulatory Guide. Answers to the specific questions are as follows:
> 
(a) As indicated in HPPOS-246, licensees may choose whether or not to add a hot particle dose to other skin or extremity doses. However, in either case, the record should be clear as to the amount of the hot particle dose. In determining whether or not an overexposure has occurred, the NRC will consider the hot particle dose alone, without adding it to other doses.

(b) The hot particle dose should not be subtracted from the remaining available shallow dose equivalent (skin or extremity) for the year.

(References: 10 CFR 20.2106, 10 CFR 20.2206, Regulatory Guide 8.7)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, December 01, 2017
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE04360A137
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 110–733 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 3195) TO RESTORE 

THE INTENT AND PROTECTIONS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 

JUNE 24, 2008.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. SUTTON, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1299] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1299, by a non-record vote, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3195, the ‘‘ADA 

Restoration Act of 2007,’’ under a closed rule. The rule provides one 

hour of debate in the House, with 40 minutes equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Education and Labor and 20 minutes equally divided 

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on the Judiciary. The rule waives all points of order 

against consideration of the bill except clauses 9 and 10 of rule 

XXI. The rule provides that the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Education and Labor 

now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted and the bill, 

as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against 

provisions of the bill, as amended, are waived. This waiver does not 

affect the point of order available under clause 9 of rule XXI (regarding earmark disclosure). 

The rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions. The rule provides that, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to a time designated by the Speaker. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill 

(except for clauses 9 and 10 of rule XXI) includes a waiver of clause 

4 of rule XIII, requiring a three-day layover of the committee report. Although the rule waives all points of order against the proviVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:34 Jun 25, 2008 Jkt 069008 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR733.XXX HR733

erowe on PROD1PC71 with REPORTS
2 

sions of the bill, as amended, the Committee is not aware of any 

points of order. The waiver of all points of order is prophylactic. 

Æ 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with REPORTS
#### SPRINGMEYER *v.*IRRIGATION DISTRICT NO. 1

No. 2660

(See 50 Nev. 80)

January 13, 1928.

On Petition for Rehearing

*Per Curiam:*

Rehearing denied.
y1-\E ~ ;- -. -, ... r>hp ,~ * \ t>i-. ,t 

12 Pi- A t.; i Q.; G S E f;,= 

09 SEP 30 RIP 9: 52 

Bill Richardson 

Governor 

State of New Mexico 

~_ffice ofthe Guvernor 

September 24,2009 

Mr. Lany E. Starfield 

Acting Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 

1445 Ross Avenue 

Dallas, TX 75202-271 1 

Dear Mr. Starfield: 

This letter is submitted to fulfill New Mexico's requirements under Section 107 (d)(l) of the 

Clean Air Act. The Clean Air Act requires all state governors to submit initial designations 

within one year of the promulgation of a new or revised National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

(NAAQS). In November of 2008, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency promulgated a 

revised NAAQS for lead. 

The New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) has determined that there are no sources 

that emit one ton per year or greater of lead in New Mexico within the jurisdiction of NMED (all 

of New Mexico except for Bernalillo County and tribal lands). I recommend attainment status of 

the lead NAAQS for all areas of New Mexico within the jurisdiction of NMED. 

Sincerely, 

Bill Richardson 

Governor of New Mexico 

cc: Mr. Ron Curry, Secretary, New Mexico Environment Department 

Ms. Mary Uhl, Chief, Air Quality Bureau 

Mr. Jim Norton, Director, Environmental Protection Division 

Mr. Alfredo Santistevan, Director, Environmental Health Dept. City of Albuquerque 

State Capitol Room 400 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 505-476-2200 www.govemor.state.nm.us
### SUBCHAPTER A—DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.
3001.
Applicability of chapter.
3002.
Definitions.
3003.
Rules of construction.
3004.
Service of process; enforcement; notice.
3005.
Application of chapter to judgments.
3006.
Affidavit requirements.
3007.
Perishable personal property.
3008.
Proceedings before United States magistrate judges.
3009.
United States marshals' authority to designate keeper.
3010.
Co-owned property.
3011.
Assessment of surcharge on a debt.
3012.
Joinder of additional defendant.
3013.
Modification or protective order; supervision of enforcement.
3014.
Exempt property.
3015.
Discovery as to debtor's financial condition.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States magistrate judges" substituted for "United States magistrates" in item 3008 pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of this title.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOR GE GUADALUPE M ORENO R AM IREZ, AKA JorgeGua da lupe M ore no, AKA B e to M ore no, AKA Jorge M ore no, AKA JorgeM ore no R am ire z , Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 13-72764 Age n c y No. A035-834-241 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. Jorge Gua da l upe M ore no R am ire z , a nat ive and c itiz e n of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B o a

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing his a pplic ation for 

# F IL ED NOV 24 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).a sy lum , withholding of rem ova l, a n d prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Against Torture (“ C AT” ). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings. Ze haty ev . Gonzale s , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th C ir. 2006). W e de ny in pa rt a nd gra nt in pa rt the pe tition for re vie w, a nd we re m and. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the B IA’ s de nia l of C AT re lie f be c a use M ore n o R am ire z fa ile d to e sta blish tha t it is more like ly

tha n not tha t he will be torture d by

or with thec onse nt or a c q uie s c e n c e of the M e xic an gove rnm e nt. Se e Silay a v . Muk

ase y , 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th C ir. 2008). In de ny ing M ore no R am i re z ’ s a sy lum and withholding of re

m ova l c l a im s, the a ge nc y found he fa i le d to e sta blish pa st pe rse c ution or a fe a r of future pe rse c ution on a c c ount of a prote c te d ground. TheB IA did not c onside r the im pa c t, if a ny , of this c ourt’ s re c e nt de c ision in He nrique z-Riv as v . Holde r , 707 F.3d 1081 (9th C ir. 2013) (e n ba nc ). Furthe r, whe n the IJ a nd B IA issue d its de c isions, they

did not ha

ve the be ne fit of this c ourt’ s de c i sions in C ordoba v
. Holde r , 726 F.3d 1106 (9th C ir. 2013), a n d Pirir-Boc v . Holde r, 750 F.3d 1077 (9th C ir. 2014), or theB IA’ s de c isions in Matte r of M-E-V-G- , 26 I. & N. De c . 227 (B IA 2014), a

nd Matte r of W

-G-R- , 26 I. & N. De c . 208 (B IA 2014). Thus, we re m and M ore no R am ire z ’ s a sy l um and withholding of re

m ova l c la im s to de te rm ine
1 3 - 7 2 7 6 4 2the i m

p a c t, if a ny , of the se de c isions. Se eIN S v . Ve ntura , 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (pe r c uriam ). Ea c h pa rty sha ll be a r its own c osts for this petition for re vie w . PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; G RANT E D in par t; RE M A NDE D.

1 3 - 7 2 7 6 4 3
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Timucuan
Ecological & Historic Preserve
Florida


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Tips for Teachers
 Following these guidelines makes a trip to the park enjoyable for everyone. It is the teacher's responsibility to share this information with chaperones and students prior to arrival at the park. If you have any special needs, please contact park staff. *These guidelines apply to self and ranger guided programs.*
Reservations are required; the size of our facility is limited.
Stay on the trails!
Only 30 people can tour the Timucuan Preserve Visitor Center at one time.
Leaders are responsible for group behavior.
A minimum of one chaperone for every ten students is required.
Wear comfortable shoes and clothing appropriate for the weather. Be prepared for biting insects.

an audio tour device held by hand with historic barn in distanceWhat you need to know
Accessibility
The park is continually striving to improve our accessibility.
a compass on a bench with the river in the backgroundBe Prepared
Emergency Planning
The best thing you can do is to take steps to prevent becoming lost or injured and know what to do if it happens.
ranger looks with binocularsFind Your Way
Directions
Park sites are spread out and some are over an hour apart.  Always check your address before heading out.
 Last updated: February 23, 2023
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 12713 Fort Caroline Road
Jacksonville,
FL
32225
 Phone: 904-641-7155 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 0:20-cv-60900- ALTMAN/Hunt 

AL DURRANT, individually 

and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CLASS ACTION 

 Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

v. 

FISERV, INC., 

 Defendant. 

___________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

 Plaintiff Al Durrant, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), hereby 

voluntarily dismisses the instant action. All claims of Plaintiff Al Durrant, individually, are hereby 

dismissed without prejudice. 

Dated: July 27, 2020 

Respectfully submitted, 

HIRALDO P.A. 

 

/s/ Manuel S. Hiraldo 

Manuel S. Hiraldo 

Florida Bar No. 030380 

401 E. Las Olas Boulevard 

Suite 1400 

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 

Email: mhiraldo@hiraldolaw.com 

Telephone: 954.400.4713 

Case 0:20-cv-60900-RKA Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, James F. Verhey, Chief Financial Officer of Kaiser Ventures LLC (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1.
The amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                               
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: December 2, 2004 |  | /s/ James F. Verhey           
|                       |  | James F. Verhey               
|                       |  | Executive Vice President & CFO



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1



                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Timothy Kelley Millet, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
          on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report, of Trust Certificates (TRUCs), Series 2001-3 Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
          trust agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these
          reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          depositor and the trustee under the trust agreement and based upon
          my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
          agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and
          the trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that
          agreement.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as trustee, and its officers and agents.

                         By: /s/ Timothy Kelley Millet
                         -----------------------------------
                         Name:   Timothy Kelley Millet
                         Title:  Chief Executive Officer/President,
                                 Bear Stearns Depositor Inc.
                         Date:   March 28, 2005