alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-66 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, May 9, 1996)

TWO NRC REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS ARE REASSIGNED

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has named Hubert J.

Miller, currently administrator of NRC Region III, headquartered

in Lisle, Ill., to be the new administrator of NRC Region I,

which has offices in King of Prussia, Pa.

Mr. Miller will succeed Thomas T. Martin, who will become

the new director of the Division of Reactor Programs Management,

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, in NRC headquarters at

Rockville, Md.

Both assignments will be effective August 4. A successor to

Mr. Miller as Region III administrator will be named in the near

future.

"I am pleased to announce these management changes," said

James M. Taylor, NRC executive director for operations.

Region I encompasses 11 states and the District of Columbia

in the northeastern United States and has 29 commercial nuclear

power reactors. Region III is responsible for the NRC regulatory

program in eight midwestern states and includes 27 commercial

nuclear reactors.

Mr. Miller has been Region III administrator since last

July. He is a graduate of Notre Dame University, where he earned

both liberal arts and civil engineering degrees, and received a

master's degree in environmental engineering from the University

of North Carolina School of Public Health.

After five years' service in the Navy, he joined the NRC in

1976 and worked for 10 years in the headquarters Office of

Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards in the areas of fuel

cycle licensing and waste management. Later, he held several

positions in the Office of Inspection and Enforcement and the

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. He moved to NRC Region III

in 1987, serving as director of the Division of Reactor Safety

and as deputy regional administrator until he was named

administrator last year.
Mr. Martin has been Region I administrator since 1990. He

is a graduate of Georgia Tech, where he received a bachelor's

degree in electrical engineering. Mr. Martin served seven years

in the Navy and worked in the electric utility industry for four

years before joining the Atomic Energy Commission (NRC's

predecessor agency) in 1974 as a reactor inspector in Region I.

Later, he directed the region's Division of Engineering and

Technical Programs, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards,

and Division of Reactor Safety. He was deputy regional

administrator for a year before being appointed as administrator.

#
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-22279-ALTONAGA

ANDRES REY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHAD F. WOLF, ACTING SECRETARY

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

HOMELAND SECURITY,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, ANDRES REY, by and through undersigned counsel, and pursuant to

41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby files this voluntary dismissal of the 

above styled action without prejudice against Defendant. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 27, 2020, I electronically filed a true and exact 

copy of the foregoing document with the Clerk of the court using the CM/ECF system which 

will send notifications of such filing to all parties of records on the service list authorized to 

receive electronic notice to CM/ECF.

BY: /s/Jay Lewis Farrow ____ 

 JAY LEWIS FARROW, ESQ.

Case 1:20-cv-22279-CMA Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

SERVICE LIST

Andres Rey v. Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security

Case No. 20-CV-22279-CMA

Carlos Raurell, Esquire

Assistant United States Attorney

Fl. Bar No. 529893

United States Attorney's Office

99 N.E. 4th Avenue, Suite 300

Miami, FL 33132

P: 305-961-9243

F: 305-530-7139

Email: carlos.raurell@usdoj.gov

Case 1:20-cv-22279-CMA Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2020 Page 2 of 2
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-96-34 July 1, 1996

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 708/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 708/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC DISPATCHES INSPECTION TEAM TO LASALLE NUCLEAR PLANT AFTER

SHUTDOWNS FOR POTENTIALLY DEGRADED EQUIPMENT COOLING SYSTEMS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is sending an Augmented

Inspection Team to the LaSalle Nuclear Power Station after both

reactors at the plant were shut down because of debris in the

intake structure which supplies cooling water for plant

components.

The two-reactor LaSalle facility, which is operated by

Commonwealth Edison Company, is near Seneca, Illinois. Unit 1

was shut down late June 28, and Unit 2 was shut down on June 29.

The debris in the intake structure resulted from repair of

cracks in the concrete of the service water intake building using

a polymer foam material. The repairs occurred in May and June.

The foam material was subsequently found in the water in the

intake building.

The intake building draws water from the LaSalle cooling

lake. The water is then pumped to cool various pieces of plant

equipment. The water is not used for reactor cooling during

normal operations.

One system, called the essential service water system, would

draw water from the intake building to provide cooling for plant

safety systems if they were needed. These safety systems include

the emergency diesel generators and heat exchangers for the

reactor cooling system which is used when the plant is shut down.

The NRC authorized the plant to continue cooling the reactor

using each unit's main condenser rather than use the shutdown

cooling system which requires operation of the essential service

water system.

On Friday, June 28, the utility found the foam material at

the bottom of the water in the intake building, near where the

essential service water system would draw its water. Previously,

it was believed that the foam was at the top of the water where

it would not affect the essential service water system.

Both LaSalle units were then shut down because of the

potential that the foam material could restrict water flow in the
essential service water system if it were needed to cool plant

safety components. Extensive testing of the essential service

water system equipment, however, had previously shown that it

would perform successfully.

Commonwealth Edison is currently locating and removing the

foam material from the structure using divers.

The NRC Augmented Inspection Team will begin its activities

July 1 with additional team members arriving on July 2. When its

onsite inspection is completed the team will hold a meeting with

the utility to discuss its preliminary findings. This meeting

will be open to public observation. The time and place of the

meeting will be announced later.

The team will issue a written report of its findings several

weeks after the completion of the inspection.

####
#### Frank M. Andrews and Another, Trading as, etc., Respondents, v. Kent Building Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Laughlin, J., dissented.
#### In the Matter of George J. Gillespie et al., Constituting the Board of Water Supply of the City of New York, Respondents, Relative to Acquiring Real Estate for and on Behalf of the City of New York, in the County of Ulster. (Rondout Riparian Section No. 2, Parcel No. 40.) Rondout Paper Mills, Inc., Appellant.

*940All concur.
Exhibit 99.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Equipment Growth & Income Fund VII (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the President of the General Partner and of the Partnership, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 
 
 
 /s/ James A. Coyne
 James A. Coyne
 President of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 November 13, 2003
### §1296. Review of certain agency actions

(a) Jurisdiction.—Subject to the provisions of chapter 179, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall have jurisdiction over a petition for review of a final decision under chapter 5 of title 3 of—

(1) an appropriate agency (as determined under section 454 of title 3);

(2) the Federal Labor Relations Authority made under part D of subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 3, notwithstanding section 7123 of title 5; or

(3) the Secretary of Labor or the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, made under part C of subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 3.

(b) Filing of Petition.—Any petition for review under this section must be filed within 30 days after the date the petitioner receives notice of the final decision.

(Added Pub. L. 104–331, §3(a)(1), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4068.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1296, added Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §127(a), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 39, related to precedence of cases in United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §402(29)(C), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3359.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 104–331, §3(d), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4071, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section and sections 1413 and 3901 to 3908 of this title and amending sections 1346 and 2402 of this title] shall take effect on October 1, 1997."
### §4145d. Review and report

#### (a) Review

During calendar year 2011, the Secretary shall conduct a review of the results achieved by the program under this part to determine—

(1) the housing constructed, acquired, or rehabilitated under the program;

(2) the effects of the housing described in paragraph (1) on costs to low-income families of affordable housing;

(3) the effectiveness of each recipient in achieving the results intended to be achieved, as described in the Indian housing plan for the Indian tribe; and

(4) the need for, and effectiveness of, extending the duration of the program and increasing the amount of grants under section 4111 of this title that may be used under the program.

#### (b) Report

Not later than December 31, 2011, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report describing the information obtained pursuant to the review under subsection (a) (including any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary with respect to the program under this part), including—

(1) recommendations regarding extension of the program for subsequent fiscal years and increasing the amounts under section 4145a(c) of this title that may be used under the program; and

(2) recommendations for—

(A)(i) specific Indian tribes or recipients that should be prohibited from participating in the program for failure to achieve results; and

(ii) the period for which such a prohibition should remain in effect; or

(B) standards and procedures by which Indian tribes or recipients may be prohibited from participating in the program for failure to achieve results.

#### (c) Provision of information to Secretary

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, recipients participating in the program under this part shall provide such information to the Secretary as the Secretary may request, in sufficient detail and in a timely manner sufficient to ensure that the review and report required by this section is accomplished in a timely manner.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title II, §235, as added Pub. L. 110–411, title II, §206(a)(2), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4328.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–330, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4016, known as the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4101 of this title and Tables.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Willis H. Newton, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: March 23, 2006



/s/    WILLIS H. NEWTON, JR.Name:

Willis H. Newton, Jr.Title:

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
HomeAbout NRCEEO/Civil Rights ProgramEqual Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights ProgramInternal Civil Rights ProgramAlternative Dispute Resolution in the NRC's EEO Program

# Alternative Dispute Resolution Coordinator/Agency Official for Employment Discrimination Complaints

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) offers Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) to NRC employees (current and former) and applicants for employment, as a means of resolving complaints related to alleged discrimination in Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO). As such, the ADR program supplements (rather than replacing) the NRC's Employment Discrimination Complaint Process.

The NRC's ADR Program is administered by the agency's Office of Small Business and Civil Rights (SBCR), with Rhonda C. Dorsey serving as ADR Coordinator. In that capacity, the ADR Coordinator coordinates all matters associated with the mediation process, including obtaining a mediator and identifying an Agency Official who has the authority to provide technical assistance during mediation and to sign the agreement if the matter is resolved.

The Agency Official is a neutral party and is never assigned to a case within their supervisory chain or a case that could create a conflict or the appearance of a conflict of interest. Consistent with the confidentiality provision of the ADR Program, the Agency Official may consult with any agency office, to the extent necessary to assist in resolving the claim.

The Agency Official and ADR Coordinator may not force a decision or resolution on any party.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 3, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - The ADR Coordinator/Agency Official
          - Mediation
          - The Pre-Complaint Stage
          - Formal Complaint Stage

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 3, 2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,527
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      776
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (522)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,114
<PP&E>                                          62,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,951
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,828
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,713
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,441
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   226
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,531
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,531
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,531
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
HomeAbout NRCState & Tribal Programs

# Tribal Liaison Team

The NRC acknowledges the sovereign rights of Federally-recognized Native American Tribal governments. The NRC maintains government-to-government communications with those Tribes, as well as with their national organizations, who are potentially affected by, or otherwise interested in, NRC regulatory activities. NRC also maintains a cooperative relationship with the National Congress of American Indians and cognizance of their related activities.

In keeping with these activities, the NRC initiates contact or responds to requests for information on specific issues related to NRC's policy and regulatory authority.

To foster effective interaction with Native American tribes, NRC staff employ the Tribal Protocol Manual, and the Tribal Consultation Information Tool.

Through Tribal Advance Notification, Tribes can choose to receive notification of irradiated reactor fuel or other nuclear waste shipments that passes across their reservation, which recognizes Tribal sovereignty and their governments' interest in being cognizant of activities taking place on Tribal reservations.

Tribal activities by state are available on the Tribal Liaison Map.

For assistance, e-mail the NRC Tribal Team, or NRC General Contact Information.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, October 12, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Federal and State Liaison Programs
          - Tribal Protocol Manual
          - Agreement State Program
          - Tribal Policy Statement
          - Tribal Advance Notification
          - Tribal Liaison Team

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, October 12, 2023