alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF DECEMBER
31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE REGISTRANT FOR THE
PERIOD FROM DECEMBER 9, 1997 (COMMENCEMENT OF OPERATIONS) TO DECEMBER 31, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-09-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,085
<SECURITIES>                                   266,054
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   852
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 271,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          178,310
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   271,307
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               428,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               167,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             111,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                150,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            150,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   150,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 55 

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 

for Members of Congress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2021 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself, Mr. HAWLEY, and Mr. BRAUN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay 

adjustments for Members of Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUST4 MENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) 

6 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 

7 4501) is repealed. 

8 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

9 Section 601(a)(1) of such Act is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘(a)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)’’; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 55 IS

1 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), 

2 and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; 

3 and 

4 (3) by striking ‘‘as adjusted by paragraph (2) 

5 of this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘adjusted as pro6 vided by law’’. 

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section and the amend8 ments made by this section shall take effect on the date 

9 on which the 118th Congress convenes. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32

             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRESIDENT AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32


                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of theS arbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



      Thomas R. Butkus,  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,  Lyn
G.  Rupich,  President  and Pamela N.  Favero,  Chief  Financial  Officer of AJS
Bancorp,  Inc. (the "Company") each certify in their capacity as officers of the
Company that they have  reviewed  the annual  report of the Company on Form 10-K
for the fiscal ended December 31, 2004 and that to the best of their knowledge:

1.    the report fully complies with the  requirements  of Sections 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    the information  contained in the report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

The purpose of this  statement  is solely to comply  with Title 18,  Chapter 63,
Section  1350 of the United  States  Code,  as  amended  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003.


June 20, 2005                               /s/ Thomas R. Butkus
Date                                        -------------------------------
                                            Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                            Executive Officer


June 20, 2005                               /s/ Lyn G. Rupich
Date                                        -------------------------------
                                            President


June 20, 2005                               /s/ Pamela N. Favero
Date                                        -------------------------------
                                            Chief Financial Officer
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5234 

To modify statutory definitions relating to narcotics and drug trafficking, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2022 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To modify statutory definitions relating to narcotics and 

drug trafficking, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting America 

5 from Narcotics and Illicit Chemicals Act of 2022’’ or the 

6 ‘‘PANIC Act of 2022’’. 

7 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF MAJOR ILLICIT DRUG PRODUCING 

8 COUNTRY. 

9 Section 481(e) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 

10 (22 U.S.C. 2291(e)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5234 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

2 (A) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘; or’’ 

3 and inserting a semicolon; 

4 (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking the 

5 semicolon at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

6 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(E) that is a significant direct source of 

8 covered synthetic drugs or psychotropic drugs 

9 or other controlled substances, including pre10 cursor chemicals when those chemicals are used 

11 in the production of such drugs and substances, 

12 significantly affecting the United States;’’; 

13 (2) by amending paragraph (5) to read as fol14 lows: 

15 ‘‘(5) the term ‘major drug-transit country’ 

16 means a country through which are transported cov17 ered synthetic drugs or psychotropic drugs or other 

18 controlled substances significantly affecting the 

19 United States;’’; 

20 (3) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and 

21 inserting a semicolon; 

22 (4) in paragraph (8), by striking the period at 

23 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

24 (5) by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5234 IS

1 ‘‘(9) the term ‘covered synthetic drug’ has the 

2 meaning given that term in section 5558 of the 

3 FENTANYL Results Act.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Exhibit 32.2]

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Med Gen, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended September 30 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report'), I, Jack Chien, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

February 8, 2007					/s/ Jack Chien
							---------------------------
							Jack Chien,
							Principal Financial Officer
### SUBCHAPTER D—FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS INVOLVING DEBTS

Sec.
3301.
Definitions.
3302.
Insolvency.
3303.
Value for a transfer or obligation. 1

3304.
Transfer fraudulent as to a debt to the United States.
3305.
When transfer is made or obligation is incurred.
3306.
Remedies of the United States.
3307.
Defenses, liability and protection of transferee. 1
3308.
Supplementary provision.

1  So in original. Does not conform to section catchline.
WACHOVIA 8739 Research Ave
SECURITIES

Management Assertion

 

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2001, First Union National Bank, (the Bank) complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) *Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.1., which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans. As of and for this same period. the Bank had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $200 million and $20 million, respectively.
 

 

 
*John M. Church			March 6, 2002
John M. Church				Date
ManagingDirector/Senior Vice President
First Union National Bank
*Timothy S. Ryan	March 6, 2002
	Timothy S. Ryan	Date

Director/Vice President

First Union National Bank***
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0374 SAT Date: 4/16/2013 Print Date: 7/1/2013

Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 12

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: DEVEL N EURO DEVEL NEURO SYSTOX MARG ONCO AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0374 FATE: Solid with MP = 165 C (M) log Kow = 0.72 (E) S = 2.48 g/L at 25 C (M)VP = 3.7E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP = Dec. 432 C (M) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 1.02 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) log Fish BAF = 0.02 (E) POTW removal (%) = 0 Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = mo Sorption to soils/sediments = low - moderate PBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = moderate - rapid

Health : Health Summary: Absorption of the neat material is nil through the skin, while absorption is poor through the skin for the material in solution, based on physical/chemical p roperties. Absorption is good through the lung and GI tract, based on test data. There are concerns for systemic and developmental toxicities, neurotoxicity, and developmental-neurotoxicity, as well as a marginal concern for oncogenicity, based on test data for the Test Data: Included on 8/10/05 Conditional Registration Fact Sheet for
Rat systox/neurotox NOAEL 1000 mg/kg, based on clinical observations at 2000 mg/kg; Rat development NOAEL =>500 mg/kg, with maternal toxic effects at 500 mg/kg and 750 mg/kg; Dog 90-day oral toxicity NOAEL 282 mg/kg (M), 232 mg/kg (F) with systemic effects to the stomach and intastines; Rat chronic feeding study NOAEL 50 mg/kg, based on effects to the cecum, mucosal epithelium hyperplasia, and decreased body weights at 500 mg/kg; Chronic (1Yr) feeding study in dogs: N OAEL 99 mg/kg (M), 93 mg/kg (F), LOAEL 967 mg/kg (M), 1038 mg/kg (F) with systemic effects to the stomach and GI, and hyperplasia in the mucosal epithelium; Chronic RfD 0.5 mg/kg, based on rat combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity NOAEL 50 mg/kg

Submitted with Acute oral study in bobwhite quail: neurotoxicity LOEL 63 mg/kg, with increasing lethargy, uncoordination, p rostration, loss of righting reflex, rigidity, and convulsions

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 >100 >100 daphnid 48-h LC50 15.2 >98.6 green algal 96-h EC50 47.6 30fish

_ chronic value >10 1.8 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.599 >102

algal

_ chronic value >10 23

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for group; SAR chemical class = MW 207; solid with mp = 162-165 oC (M); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 180

SARs SAR Class Ecotox Category

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
#### The People of the State of New York v. David Wasser.

Motion granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §1. Design and duties of bureau generally

The general design and duties of the Bureau of Labor Statistics shall be to acquire and diffuse among the people of the United States useful information on subjects connected with labor, in the most general and comprehensive sense of that word, and especially upon its relation to capital, the hours of labor, the earnings of laboring men and women, and the means of promoting their material, social, intellectual, and moral prosperity.

(June 13, 1888, ch. 389, §1, 25 Stat. 182; Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §4, 32 Stat. 826; Mar. 18, 1904, ch. 716, 33 Stat. 136; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §3, 37 Stat. 737.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Act June 27, 1884, created Bureau of Labor in Department of the Interior.

Section 1 of act June 13, 1888, created Department of Labor and outlined its general design and duties, and section 9 of that act transferred Bureau of Labor to Department of Labor.

Act Feb. 14, 1903, placed Department of Labor under jurisdiction and made it a part of Department of Commerce and Labor.

Act Mar. 18, 1904, changed name of Department of Labor to Bureau of Labor in Department of Commerce and Labor.

Act Mar. 4, 1913, created Department of Labor and transferred Bureau of Labor from Department of Commerce and Labor to newly created Department of Labor, redesignating such transferred Bureau as Bureau of Labor Statistics.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of Labor, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Labor, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 6 of 1950, §§1, 2, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 10Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of 10Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 3 of 10Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 4 of 10Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 5 of 10Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 6 of 10Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 7 of 10Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 8 of 10Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 9 of 10Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 10 of10
453 P.2d 375

#### RABBIT EAR CATTLE COMPANY, a New Mexico Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lula SINK, Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of W. J. Sink, Deceased, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 8718.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

April 21, 1969.

Ethan K. Stevens, Clayton, for appellant.

Kenneth E. Beck, Clayton, for appellee.

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This is a companion case to Rabbit Ear Cattle Company v. Frieze, 80 N.M. 203, 453 P.2d 373. The plaintiff brought this action to recover $440.00 alleged to have been mistakenly overpaid to the defendant for pasturage. The cases were consolidated for argument in this court. While the .facts differ slightly, the legal principle is common to both cases. The specific question is whether there is substantial evidence to support the trial court's finding that the *206plaintiff mistakenly paid to the defendant a balance of $2,440.00 for pasturage of cattle for the 1965 season when the claimed true balance was $2,000.00.

The trial court found that plaintiff and defendant entered into an oral agreement whereby the defendant was to pasture 250 head of yearlings at $16.00 per head for the 1965 season, the pasturage fee to be paid one half at the time the yearlings were placed on pasture and the remaining one half to be paid when the yearlings were taken out of pasture. The court also found that in settlement the plaintiff mistakenly overpaid the amount of $440.00 to the defendant.

The defendant challenges the findings as not having support in the evidence. Where findings of fact are challenged on appeal we will not weigh the evidence but will only examine the evidence to determine whether it substantially supports the findings. Rabbit Ear Cattle Company v. Frieze, supra. After the cattle were removed from the pasture, the parties met in a cafe in Clayton as stated in Rabbit Ear Cattle Company v. Frieze, supra, to settle the account. A controversy arose at that time between the plaintiff and the defendant as to the terms of the contract and as to the amount due. The defendant contended that the contract provided for $20.00 per head for the grazing season and demanded settlement on that basis. Conversely, the plaintiff contended that the contract was for $16.00 per head for the grazing season. In the face of this dispute, Mr. Harris, president of plaintiff company, after deducting $60.00 for missing cattle, paid the disputed amount of $440.00 to avoid further argument in a public cafe, so he claims. The record indicates that there were no customers in the cafe at the time.

The appeal is controlled by Rabbit Ear Cattle Company v. Frieze, supra. The record is devoid of evidence of mistake of fact. The payment was made in settlement of a disputed claim with full knowledge of all material facts. On authority of that case the judgment must be reversed with directions to dismiss the action.

It is so ordered.

NOBLE, C. J., and MOISE, J., concur.
[EXHIBIT 31.1]



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Paul Kravitz, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Med Gen, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the

registrant and have:



a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c.

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a.

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have

identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect

internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: December 29, 2008



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Paul B. Kravitz    
|Paul B. Kravitz        
|Chief Executive Officer
### §476. Enhancement of judicial information dissemination

(a) The Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall prepare a semiannual report, available to the public, that discloses for each judicial officer—

(1) the number of motions that have been pending for more than six months and the name of each case in which such motion has been pending;

(2) the number of bench trials that have been submitted for more than six months and the name of each case in which such trials are under submission; and

(3) the number and names of cases that have not been terminated within three years after filing.

(b) To ensure uniformity of reporting, the standards for categorization or characterization of judicial actions to be prescribed in accordance with section 481 of this title shall apply to the semiannual report prepared under subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 101–650, title I, §103(a), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5093.)