alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.703 How does an organization apply to become an Intermediary? ( a ) *Application Process.* Organizations interested in becoming Intermediaries should contact SBA for information on the application process.
( b ) *Documentation in support of application.* The application must include a detailed narrative statement describing: ( 1 ) The types of businesses assisted in the past and those the applicant intends to assist with Microloans;
( 2 ) The average size of the loans made in the past and the average size of intended Microloans;
( 3 ) The extent to which the applicant will make Microloans to small businesses in rural areas;
( 4 ) The geographic area in which the applicant intends to operate, including a description of the economic and demographic conditions existing in the intended area of operations;
( 5 ) The availability and cost of obtaining credit for small businesses in the area;
( 6 ) The applicant's experience and qualifications in providing marketing, management, and technical assistance to small businesses; and
( 7 ) Any plan to use other technical assistance resources (such as counselors from the Service Corps of Retired Executives) to help Microloan borrowers.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
HARVEY MOORE AND ) ASSOCIATES, INC., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5658 ) HAHN LOESER & PARKS, LLP, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 12, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Steven Scott Stephens, Judge. G. Donovan Conwell, Jr. of Conwell Business Law, LLLP, Tampa, for Appellant. Edmond E. Koester of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., Naples, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
SILBERMAN, KELLY, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of TEPPCO GP, Inc., the sole
general partner of TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2002, filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|                                                  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|March 27, 2003                                    |  | 
|                                                  |  | 
|Date                                              |  | 
|                                                  |  | 
|/s/ CHARLES H. LEONARD                            |  | 
|                                                  |  | 
|Charles H. Leonard                                |  | 
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |
[Exhibit 32.1]

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Med Gen, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report'), I, Jack Chien, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

December 29, 2007


/s/ Paul B. Kravitz
---------------------------
Paul B. Kravitz,
Principal Executive Officer
§ 422.4 Responsibilities of the Commissioner of Reclamation. ( a ) The Secretary of the Interior has designated the Commissioner of Reclamation to implement law enforcement authority at Reclamation facilities. The Commissioner is responsible for: ( 1 ) Implementing the provisions of Public Law 107-69;
( 2 ) Ensuring consistency with applicable Departmental and Reclamation requirements for law enforcement officers;
( 3 ) Carrying out the specific responsibilities listed in paragraph (b) of this section; and
( 4 ) Developing any additional policies necessary for the successful accomplishment of Reclamation's law enforcement responsibilities.
( b ) The Commissioner's specific responsibilities include the following: ( 1 ) Designating Reclamation's Law Enforcement Administrator (LEA), with authority to discharge the responsibilities assigned by these regulations;
( 2 ) Overseeing the LEA's ability to ensure that all law enforcement officers under contract or cooperative agreement for law enforcement services to Reclamation are properly trained and receive necessary authorizations; and
( 3 ) Overseeing the LEA's development of policy, procedures, and standards for directing the law enforcement units, and the installation of management controls for proper implementation of the law enforcement program.
### §2108. Effect on other laws

The giving of notice pursuant to this chapter, if done in good faith compliance with this chapter, shall not constitute a violation of the National Labor Relations Act [29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.] or the Railway Labor Act [45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 100–379, §9, Aug. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 894.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Labor Relations Act, referred to in text, is act July 5, 1935, ch. 372, 49 Stat. 452, which is classified generally to subchapter II (§151 et seq.) of chapter 7 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 167 of this title and Tables.

The Railway Labor Act, referred to in text, is act May 20, 1926, ch. 347, 44 Stat. 577, which is classified principally to chapter 8 (§151 et seq.) of Title 45, Railroads. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 151 of Title 45 and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 6 months after Aug. 4, 1988, see section 11 of Pub. L. 100–379, set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.
### §139. Times for holding regular sessions

The times for commencing regular sessions of the district court for transacting judicial business at the places fixed by this chapter shall be determined by the rules or orders of the court. Such rules or orders may provide that at one or more of such places the court shall be in continuous session for such purposes on all business days throughout the year. At other places a session of the court shall continue for such purposes until terminated by order of final adjournment or by commencement of the next regular session at the same place.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 897; Pub. L. 88–139, §1, Oct. 16, 1963, 77 Stat. 248.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

The purpose of this section is to remove all doubt as to whether the mere beginning of a new term at one place ends a prior term begun at another place. As revised, it conforms to a uniform course of judicial decisions. See U.S. v. Perlstein, 39 F.Supp. 965, 968 (D.C.N.J. 1941), and cases cited.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1963—Pub. L. 88–139 substituted provisions requiring the times for commencing regular sessions of the district court to be determined by the rules or orders of the court, authorizing such rules or orders to provide that at one or more of the places fixed by this chapter, the court shall be in continuous session on all business days throughout the year, and that at other places, a session continues until terminated by order of final adjournment or by commencement of the next regular session at the same place, for provisions that a term continues until terminated by order of final adjournment or by commencement of the next term at the same place, in the text, and "Times for holding regular sessions" for "Term continued until terminated" in section catchline.
# Az Európai Unió C 18A/2006

| | ISSN 1725-518X |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 18A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 49. évfolyam2006. január 25. |

ISSN 1725-518X

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 18A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

49. évfolyam2006. január 25.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Közlemények |
| | Európai Élelmiszer-biztonsági Hatóság |
| 2006/C 018A/1 | Felhívás az Európai Élelmiszer-biztonsági Hatóság Tudományos Bizottságában és tudományos testületeiben való tagságra irányuló szándéknyilatkozat benyújtására (A szándéknyilatkozat benyújtásának határidejét 2006. február 17-ig meghosszabbítjuk) | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

III   Közlemények

Európai Élelmiszer-biztonsági Hatóság

2006/C 018A/1

Felhívás az Európai Élelmiszer-biztonsági Hatóság Tudományos Bizottságában és tudományos testületeiben való tagságra irányuló szándéknyilatkozat benyújtására (A szándéknyilatkozat benyújtásának határidejét 2006. február 17-ig meghosszabbítjuk)

1

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

III Közlemények

Európai Élelmiszer-biztonsági Hatóság

| 25.1.2006 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 18/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2006

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 18/1

---

FELHÍVÁS AZ EURÓPAI ÉLELMISZER-BIZTONSÁGI HATÓSÁG TUDOMÁNYOS BIZOTTSÁGÁBAN ÉS TUDOMÁNYOS TESTÜLETEIBEN VALÓ TAGSÁGRA IRÁNYULÓ SZÁNDÉKNYILATKOZAT BENYÚJTÁSÁRA

(A szándéknyilatkozat benyújtásának határidejét 2006. február 17-ig meghosszabbítjuk)

(2006/C 18 A/01)

A pályázatok benyújtásának az
  Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjában (C 289 A, 2005. november 22., 6. o.) közzétett határideje 2006. január 7. Az online jelentkezésekkel kapcsolatos, különösen a pályázati időszak utolsó hetében tapasztalható, nyilvánvalóan ismétlődő problémák miatt azonban a szándéknyilatkozat benyújtásának határidejét 2006. február 17-ig meghosszabbítjuk.

Ez a felhívás azoknak a tudósoknak szól, akik szeretnének az élelmiszerjog általános elveiről és követelményeiről, az Európai Élelmiszer-biztonsági Hatóság (EFSA) létrehozásáról és az élelmiszer-biztonságra vonatkozó eljárások megállapításáról szóló, 2002. január 28-i 178/2002/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelettel létrehozott Európai Élelmiszer-biztonsági Hatóság Tudományos Bizottsága vagy egyik tudományos testülete tagjává válni. A hatóság állandó székhelye Pármában, Olaszországban található.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          84,807
<SECURITIES>                                    30,355
<RECEIVABLES>                                  152,310
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,410
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               297,013
<PP&E>                                         111,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 362,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,239
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              631
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     237,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   362,911
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               461,512
<CGS>                                          546,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  546,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (18,340)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                18,527
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  60
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (66,330)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (23,216)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (43,114)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (43,114)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.69)


</TABLE>
### [§28. Renumbered §45C]
#### Friedrich W. Foerster v. Victor F. Ridder.

Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 665.]
Exhibit 4.435

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182537 dated July 15, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Data transmission services, except for data transmission services for the purpose of voice transmission

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until July 15, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 23, 2020 No. 172-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Terlyakov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here

Official seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS,
   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

AND MASS MEDIA

PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119590
Exhibit
32.1





Ener1,
Inc.


1540
Broadway, Suite 25C


New York,
New York 10036





January
19, 2010





Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, NE


Washington,
DC 20549





Re:
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350





Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 2
of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, I, Charles Gassenheimer, Chief Executive Officer of
Ener1, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 2 of Ener1, Inc., for the
      quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and





2)
            the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment
      No. 2 of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Ener1, Inc.





/s/
      Charles GassenheimerCharles
      Gassenheimer
                    Chief
      Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
                    (Principal
      Executive Officer and
                    Duly
      Authorized
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





This
certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to Ener1, Inc.’s
quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
filing.
#### William Sage et al., Plaintiffs in Error, *v.*R. Reeves et al., Defendants in Error.

March 30, 1885.

A case involving substantially the same points, against the same defenddants, *Baum & Go.*v. *Fryear et al.,*has recently been decided by the Supreme Court of this state ; and upon the authority of that case the judgment here is affirmed.

Error to Johnson Circuit .Court, Hon. Noah. M. GfivAH, Judge.

*211*Affirmed.*

The facts sufficiently appear in the. opinion of the court, so far as necessary, to be stated.

*W. W.*Wood, for plaintiff in error.

I. The letters written by plaintiff in error to R. Gr. Dun & Co, should have been admitted in evidence to show extent and scope of authority. ...

II. The refusal of instruction,, to the.effect that a rcl?c«e of one party, jointly liable, does not raise a presumption of release to the others, was clearly er*roneous.*— Patterson v. Camden, 25, Mo. 13; Powell, v. *Charless,*34 Mo. ,485 ; *Spaunhorst*y. *Link,*,46 Mo. 197; *Leabo*v. *Goode,*67 Mo. 126; *Brisco.e*v.. *Callahan, 77*Mo. 134; *Coclcrill*v. *Johnson,*28 Arkansas, 193. Also the instruction declaring that defendant had introduced no evidence in support of the allegations of his answer, should have been given.

O. L. Hours, for the respondent.

1. Instructions given by the court for plaintiff covers the grounds of those refused, and there is no just ground of complaint;

II. The court found for defendant, and the evidence is abundant to support the finding. Where it has been clearly established, as in this case, that the new firm agreed to assume the obligations of the old, very slight evidence is required to show that the new liability was *accepted.*— Register v. *Dodge,*Federal Reporter, Yol. 6, page 6.

Opinion by

Ellison, J.

C. Fryear composed the company of the firm of R. Reeves *&*Co. The case was dismissed as to R. Reeves. The firm was indebted to various parties when Fryear sold out his interest to Frank Reeves a brother of R. Reeves ; the firm thereafter being Reeves & Bro.

There was evidence at the trial tending .to show that when Fryear sold out, the new firm of Reeves *&*Bro. assumed the debt of the old firm of Reeves & Co., which assumption was accepted and agreed to by their cred*212itors, thereby discharging Fryear. There was also evidence tending to” show the creditors were not a party to this agreement.

A trial resulted in favor of defendant, and plaintiffs prosecute this writ.

Various exceptions were taken to the action of the court in the progress of the trial. A case of Baum & Co. against Fryear, this defendant, involving the same questions presented here, has just been decided by the Supreme Court. It seems that Baum & Co. claimed to be creditors of the old firm, and denied any release or discharge of defendant. A trial resulted in a judgment in favor of defendant, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court. The points involved in this case are substantially the same. Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of TEPPCO GP, Inc., the sole
general partner of TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2003, filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-K. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TE Products Pipeline
Company, Limited Partnership and will be retained by TE Products Pipeline
Company, Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

February 27, 2004
Date

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ BARRY R. PEARL                   
|Barry R. Pearl                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|TEPPCO GP, Inc., General Partner
### §§49m, 49n. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 49m, Pub. L. 88–136, title I, Oct. 11, 1963, 77 Stat. 225, relating to payments to States for administrative expenses for their unemployment compensation law and their public employment offices, was from the Department of Labor Appropriation Act, 1964, and was not repeated in the Department of Labor Appropriation Act of 1965. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Aug. 14, 1962, Pub. L. 87–582, title I, 76 Stat. 363.

Sept. 22, 1961, Pub. L. 87–290, title I, 75 Stat. 591.

Sept. 2, 1960, Pub. L. 86–703, title I, 74 Stat. 757.

Aug. 14, 1959, Pub. L. 86–158, title I, 73 Stat. 341.

Aug. 1, 1958, Pub. L. 85–580, title I, 72 Stat. 458.

June 29, 1957, Pub. L. 85–67, title I, 71 Stat. 212.

June 29, 1956, ch. 477, title I, 70 Stat. 424.

June 29, 1956, ch. 437, title I, 69 Stat. 398.

July 2, 1954, ch. 457, title I, 68 Stat. 435.

July 31, 1953, ch. 296, title I, 67 Stat. 246.

July 5, 1952, ch. 575, title I, 66 Stat. 369.

Aug. 31, 1951, ch. 373, title I, 65 Stat. 210.

Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, ch. V, title I, 64 Stat. 643.

June 29, 1949, ch. 275, title II, 63 Stat. 284.

June 16, 1948, ch. 472, title I, 62 Stat. 445.

Section 49n, Pub. L. 88–136, title I, Oct. 11, 1963, 77 Stat. 226, relating to personnel standards, was from the Department of Labor Appropriation Act, 1964, and was not repeated in the Department of Labor Appropriation Act of 1965. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriations acts:

Aug. 14, 1962, Pub. L. 87–582, title I, 76 Stat. 363.

Sept. 22, 1961, Pub. L. 87–290, title I, 75 Stat. 591.

Sept. 2, 1960, Pub. L. 86–703, title I, 74 Stat. 757.

Aug. 14, 1959, Pub. L. 86–158, title I, 73 Stat. 341.

Aug. 1, 1958, Pub. L. 85–580, title I, 72 Stat. 458.

June 29, 1957, Pub. L. 85–67, title I, 71 Stat. 212.

June 29, 1956, ch. 477, title I, 70 Stat. 425.

Aug. 1, 1955, ch. 437, title I, 69 Stat. 398.

July 2, 1954, ch. 457, title I, 68 Stat. 435.

July 31, 1953, ch. 296, title I, 67 Stat. 246.

July 5, 1952, ch. 575, title I, 66 Stat. 359.

Aug. 31, 1951, ch. 273, title I, 65 Stat. 210.

Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, ch. V, title I, 64 Stat. 644.

June 29, 1949, ch. 275, title II, 63 Stat. 284.

June 16, 1948, ch. 472, title I, 62 Stat. 445.

July 8, 1947, ch. 210, title I, 61 Stat. 263.

July 26, 1946, ch. 672, title I, 60 Stat. 685.