alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 00-1704

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL CRUZ-REYES, A/K/A SEALED DEFENDANT 1,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Selya, Circuit Judge,

Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,

and Boudin, Circuit Judge.

Edgar R. Vega Pabon on brief for appellant.

Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Jorge E. VegaPacheco, Assistant United States Attorney, and Camille VelezRive, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

July 5, 2000
-2-

Per Curiam. After a thorough review of the record

and of the submissions of the parties, we affirm the

district court’s decision to detain the defendant based on

risk of flight. 

The evidence proffered by the government showed

that appellant Michael Cruz Reyes (“Cruz”) possesses

extensive financial resources, and Cruz lied to Pretrial

Services about those resources. In light of the extent of

those resources and Cruz’ dishonest statements, the amount

of the bond suggested by Cruz seems woefully inadequate,

especially where the real estate securing that bond does not

belong to Cruz. For a defendant allegedly involved in drug

trafficking of this magnitude, forfeiture of bond may be

“simply a cost of doing business.” United States v. Jessup,

757 F.2d 378, 385 (1st Cir. 1985) (quoting S.Rep. No. 225,

98th Cong., 1st Sess. 23-24 (1983), reprinted in 1984 U.S.Code

Cong. & Admin. News, pp. 26, 27).

We find no error in the lower court’s decision to

discount the evidence of Cruz’ self-surrender in the instant

matter, in light of the government’s proffer indicating Cruz

fled from an officer attempting to arrest him in a 1995
-3-

incident. Further, the lower court was entitled to reject

Cruz’ suggestion that he be placed on electronic monitoring;

while increasing the likelihood that flight will be detected

(and thereby deterring flight), electronic monitoring is not

always effective. See United States v. O’Brien, 895 F.2d

810, 815-16 (1st Cir. 1990) (recognizing that while

electronic monitoring acts as a deterrent against flight,

defendants do escape while being monitored and are never

found). We see no error in the lower court’s conclusion

that in light of all the factors in § 3142(g), electronic

monitoring would be insufficient here, especially

considering the financial resources of the defendant, the

inadequate bond offered, and Cruz’ prior false statements.

Finally, while the witnesses who make up the bulk

of the government’s case against Cruz are cooperating

witnesses, and therefore are more vulnerable to impeachment

attempts, we find no error in the lower court’s reliance on

that evidence, see 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(2), especially since

more than one witness apparently identifies Cruz as a

significant actor in the charged conspiracy.

Affirmed. 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 2

- 00 476

- C R



### ____________________

SARAH ELIZABETH WEEKLY

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 09

- 07377

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Sarah Elizabeth Weekly pleaded guilty under a plea agreement to forgery.

The trial court deferred adjudication of guilt, placed her on unadjudicated

community supervision for three years, and assessed a $500 fine. After the State

filed a motion to revoke, the trial court found Weekly violated a term of the

community supervision, adjudicated her guilt, and sentenced her to twenty months

in state jail.2 Weekly’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional

evaluation of the record. Counsel concludes there are no arguable points of error.

See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967);

High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). This Court granted an

extension of time for appellant to file a pro se response. We received no response

fr om the appellant. We have reviewed the appellate record and agree with

counsel’s conclusion. It is unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re

brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App.

1991). The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

________________________________ DAVID GAULTNEY

Justice

Submitted on March 21, 2013

Opinion Delivere d April 3, 2013

D o Not Publish

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
### §2505. Applications

To be eligible to be selected under section 2503(b) of this title to receive technical assistance provided with grants made under section 2503(a) of this title, an employer or labor union shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner and containing or accompanied by such information as the Secretary may reasonably require. At a minimum, the application should include—

(1) a description of the need for technical assistance;

(2) a description of the types of apprenticeable occupations or nontraditional occupations in which the employer or labor union would like to train or employ women;

(3) assurances that there are or will be suitable and appropriate positions available in the apprenticeable occupations program or in the nontraditional occupations being targeted; and

(4) commitments that reasonable efforts shall be made to place qualified women in apprenticeable occupations or nontraditional occupations.

(Pub. L. 102–530, §6, Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3467.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,433                       0
<SECURITIES>                                    33,159                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,436                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       240                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        138                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,770                       0
<PP&E>                                           3,956                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,442                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,335                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,282                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            74                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,999                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,335                       0
<SALES>                                          5,352                  10,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,352                  10,753
<CGS>                                              188                     387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      865                   1,608
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,894                   9,340
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    139                     885
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8                      56
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                131                     829
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       131                     829
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02                     .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02                     .10
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48216-48217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19084]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8411]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Wols: Retrospective''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Wols: Retrospective,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural

[[Page 48217]]

significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at The Menil Collection, Houston, 
Texas, from on or about September 12, 2013, until on or about January 
12, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

     Dated: July 30, 2013.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-19084 Filed 8-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.435 Which loan pledges do not require notice to or consent by SBA? ( a ) Notwithstanding the provisions of § 120.434(e), 7(a) loans may be pledged for the following purposes without notice to or consent by SBA: ( 1 ) Treasury tax and loan accounts;
( 2 ) The deposit of public funds;
( 3 ) Uninvested trust funds;
( 4 ) Borrowings from a Federal Reserve Bank; or
( 5 ) Advances by a Federal Home Loan Bank.
( b ) For purposes of the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), the other provisions of § 120.434 shall also not apply to PPP loans pledged under paragraph (a)(4) or (5) of this section.
[85 FR 21752, Apr. 20, 2020]
### SERVED : OCTOBE R18 , 201 0 i;^'ARTMENTO F U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N: , <p f OPERATIOKi

S OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C n( \T ] I9 A 9:3 3 INTH EMATTE RO F POLA RAI RCARGO , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . CP07EA000 6 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2007-2791 4

NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 2006EA150048 ) ha s bee nassigne d t o th e undersigned . Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o nth e attache d Servic e List .

Ronni e A . Yode r Chie f Administrativ e La w Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP07EA000 6 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVICi : LIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AdC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building-^Suit e 2Wl000 ^

ON ECOP Y Pau l A . Lange , Respondent' s Counse l Law Office s o f

Pau l A . Lange , LL C j 8 0 Ferr y Boulevar d Stratford , C T 06615-607 9 TEL : 203-375-772 4 FAX : 203-375-939 7 Christia nL . Lewerenz , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e d f th e Rtegjona

l Counse l EasternRegio n 1 Aviatio nPlaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-327 3 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A . Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE l 2-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E , Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was b y U.S . Mail . For servic e in person o r

b y expeditedcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviation Administration , 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , DC 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .

- 2 -
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

Exhibit 21
Subsidiaries of the Company
Hypercom Corporation

List of Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

        Name of Entity                              Jurisdiction of Organization
----------------------------------------------      ----------------------------
<S>                                                 <C>
1.      Hypercom U.S.A., Inc.                       Delaware
2.      HBNet, Inc.                                 Arizona
3.      Hypercom EMEA, Inc.                         Arizona
4.      Golden Eagle Leasing, Inc.                  Arizona
5.      Hypercom Horizon, Inc.                      Missouri
6.      ePicNetz, Inc.                              Nevada
7.      Hypercom Manufacturing Resources, Inc.      Arizona
8.      Hypercom Latino America, Inc.               Arizona
9.      Hypercom Canada Ltd.                        Canada
10.     Hypercom de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.            Mexico
11.     Hypercom de Chile, S.A.                     Chile
12.     Netset Chile, S.A.                          Chile
13.     Hypercom Argentina S.A.                     Argentina
14.     Hypercom de Venezuela C.A.                  Venezuela
15.     Hypercom do Brasil Industria e Comercio     Brazil
        Limitada
16.     Hypercom do Brasil Comercial Limitada       Brazil
17.     Netset SP Tecnologia e Servicos em          Brazil
        Teleinformatica Limitada
18.     Schalter Eletronica Limitada                Brazil
19.     Hypercom Colombia                           Colombia
20.     Hypercom Gmbh                               Germany
21.     Hypercom France S.A.R.L.                    France
22.     Hypercom Financial Terminals AB             Sweden
23.     Hypercom Hungary KFT                        Hungary
24.     Hypercom Australia Pty., Ltd.               Australia
25.     Hypercom Far East Ltd.                      Hong Kong
26.     Hypercom Asia Ltd.                          Hong Kong
27.     Hypercom Asia (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.         Singapore
28.     Hypercom (Thailand) Co., Ltd.               Thailand
29.     Hypercom Trading (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.        China
30.     Hypercom Electronic Manufacturing           China
        (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.
31.     Hypercom China Co. Ltd.                     Hong Kong
32.     Hypercom Asia Services Ltd.                 Hong Kong
33.     Hypercom Network Services, LLC              Arizona
</TABLE>
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-216 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, October 14, 1999)

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

(ACRS) has scheduled a technical meeting November 4-6 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in Conference Room T-2B3 of the

agency’s Two White Flint North building at 11545 Rockville Pike.

Here is the complete agenda:

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 4

8:30 - 9:15 a.m. -- Preparation for meeting with the Commission.

9:30 - 11:30 a.m. -- Meeting with Commission.

1:00 - 1:15 p.m. -- Opening remarks by the ACRS Chairman.

1:15 - 2:45 p.m. -- Proposed revision to Section 11 of NUMARC 93-01, assessment of risk

resulting from performance of maintenance activities.

3:00 - 5:00 p.m. -- NRC Safety Research Program Report to the Commission.

5:00 - 6:00 p.m. -- Break and preparation of draft ACRS reports.

6:00 - 7:00 p.m. -- Discussion of proposed ACRS reports.

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 5

8:30 - 8:35 a.m. -- Opening remarks by the ACRS Chairman.

8:35 - 10:00 a.m. -- Proposed changes to the design control document associated with the

AP600 Design.

10:15 - 11:45 a.m. -- Discussion of spent fuel fire risk associated with decommissioning.
12:45 - 1:45 p.m. -- Status resolution of issues associated with design bases information.

1:45 - 2:15 p.m. -- Discussion of future ACRS activities.

2:30 - 3:00 p.m. -- Report of the Planning and Procedures Subcommittee.

3:00 - 3:15 p.m. -- Reconciliation of the ACRS comments and recommendations.

3:15 - 4:00 p.m. -- Break and preparation of draft ACRS reports.

4:15 - 7:00 p.m. -- Discussion of proposed ACRS reports.

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 6

8:30 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. -- Discussion of proposed ACRS reports.

2:00 - 2:30 p.m. -- Miscellaneous.

Although meetings of the ACRS are open, they are not a part of the agency’s normal

hearing process. The ACRS, an advisory committee to the Commission, conducts independent,

highly technical reviews of safety considerations related to nuclear facilities.

While anyone may attend, the committee will consider only oral or written statements

arranged in advance and limited to specific matters described in a Notice of Meeting published

in an upcoming edition of the Federal Register. ACRS meeting agendas, transcripts, and letter

reports are available on the internet, at http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

Those seeking information on opportunities to present oral statements or on schedule

changes, should contact Sam Duraiswamy, at 301-415-7364.

###
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

Walnut Creek Field Office

1450 Maria Lane, Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5378

RIV-9732

May 23, 1997

CONTACT: Mark Hammond FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Office (510) 975-0254

Home: (415) 674-1024

Pager: (800) 916-4952

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT WNP-2 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials at the Region IV

office in Arlington, Texas, have announced the assignment of

Scott Boynton as the agency’s new senior resident inspector at

the WNP-2 nuclear power plant near Richland, Washington.

Mr. Boynton joined the NRC in 1991, in the emergency

preparedness branch of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

at agency headquarters in Rockville, Maryland. In July 1995, he

was named a resident inspector at the Diablo Canyon nuclear power

plant near San Luis Obispo, California.

A native of Huntsville, Alabama, Mr. Boynton earned his

bachelor’s degree in engineering physics at the University of

Colorado in 1986. He received his commission as an officer in

the U.S. Navy in 1986 and, following nuclear power training,

served aboard the nuclear submarine U.S.S. Michigan out of

Bangor, Washington until 1991.

Mr. Boynton and his wife, Kristine, are the parents of two

children, Allison, 3, and John, 1. He joins George Replogle, NRC

resident inspector, at WNP-2.

-- 30 --
#### Society for Savings *v.*Robert H. Kalechman et al.

*Robert H. Kalechman,*pro se, in support of the petition.

*Donald G. Rosenberg,*in opposition.

Decided April 23, 1986

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 6 Conn. App. 468, is denied.
#### In the Matter of West Side Savings Bank, Respondent. Samuel A. Hyman et al., as Executors of William Hyman, Deceased, Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
### §481. Automated case information

(a) The Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall ensure that each United States district court has the automated capability readily to retrieve information about the status of each case in such court.

(b)(1) In carrying out subsection (a), the Director shall prescribe—

(A) the information to be recorded in district court automated systems; and

(B) standards for uniform categorization or characterization of judicial actions for the purpose of recording information on judicial actions in the district court automated systems.

(2) The uniform standards prescribed under paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection shall include a definition of what constitutes a dismissal of a case and standards for measuring the period for which a motion has been pending.

(c) Each United States district court shall record information as prescribed pursuant to subsection (b) of this section.

(Added Pub. L. 101–650, title I, §103(a), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5095.)
SUPPLEMENTAL NET PROFITS
CONVEYANCE
 OF THE
 WILLIAMS COAL SEAM GAS ROYALTY
TRUST




---



##### 



SUPPLEMENTAL NET PROFITS CONVEYANCE
 th
 RECITALS:
 WHEREAS st
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS




---



##### 



WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 ARTICLE I
   ARTICLE II




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
  th
 Williams Production Company LLC
    
    Bank Of America, N.A.,Trustee of the Williams Coal Seam Gas 
Royalty TrustBy:
    
    /s/ Bryan Guderian
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Ron. E. HooperName: Bryan Guderian
    
    
    
    
    
    Name: Ron E. HooperTitle:   Vice President
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:   Senior Vice President andAdministrator