alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 522 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 79
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 522

                          [Report No. 117-25]

   To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to 
  include a link to a 100-word plain language summary of the proposed 
                                 rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                March 2 (legislative day, March 1), 2021

Mr. Lankford (for himself, Ms. Sinema, Mr. Risch, Mr. Johnson, and Mr. 
    Peters) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

                             June 21, 2021

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to 
  include a link to a 100-word plain language summary of the proposed 
                                 rule.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Accountability Through 
Transparency Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO POST A 100-WORD SUMMARY TO REGULATIONS.GOV.

    Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) the Internet address of a summary of not more than 
        100 words in length of the proposed rule, in plain language, 
        that shall be posted on the Internet website under section 
        206(d) of the E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) 
        (commonly known as regulations.gov).''.
                                                        Calendar No. 79

117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 522

                          [Report No. 117-25]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to 
  include a link to a 100-word plain language summary of the proposed 
                                 rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 21, 2021

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### John Twyman et al., Appellants, v. Milk Bottlers Federation, Respondent.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
Exhibit
32.2





Ener1,
Inc.


1540
Broadway, Suite 25C


New York,
New York 10036





August 6,
2009





Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, NE


Washington,
DC 20549





Re:
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350





Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ener1, Inc.,
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, I, Gerard A. Herlihy, Chief Financial Officer of Ener1, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended June
      30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





2)
            the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ener1,
      Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Ener1, Inc.





/s/
      Gerard A. HerlihyGerard
      A. Herlihy
                    Chief
      Financial Officer
                    (Duly
      Authorized Principal Financial and Principal
                    Accounting
      Officer and Duly Authorized
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





This
certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to Ener1, Inc.’s
quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
filing.
### §219. Separability

If any provision of this chapter or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this chapter and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 676, §19, 52 Stat. 1069.)
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 43 (Wednesday, March 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 12497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04820]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2014-OS-0027]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Contract Audit Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a System of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Contract Audit Agency is deleting a system of 
records notice in its existing inventory of record systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended. The notice is entitled ``RDCAA 
152.2, Personnel Security Data Files.''

DATES: Comments will be accepted on or before April 4, 2014. This 
proposed action will be effective on the day following the end of the 
comment period unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
    * Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    * Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark Center 
Drive, East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Defense Contract Audit Agency Privacy 
Management Analyst at (703) 767-1022.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Contract Audit Agency systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or at http://dpclo.defense.gov/.
    The Defense Contract Audit Agency proposes to delete one system of 
records notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion 
is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 
(5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: February 28, 2014.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
RDCAA 152.2

System name:
    Personnel Security Data Files (May 18, 1999, 64 FR 26947).

Reason:
    Records are covered by DoD System of Records Notice, DMDC 12 DoD, 
Joint Personnel Adjudication System (JPAS) (May 3, 2011, 76 FR 24863). 
Therefore, RDCAA 152.2, Personnel Security Data Files can be deleted.
[FR Doc. 2014-04820 Filed 3-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-40457, 333-40459, 333-40461, 333-40333 and 333-43622)
pertaining to the various stock issuance programs of Hypercom Corporation of our
report dated February 15, 2001 except for Note 20 as to which the date is March
26, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Hypercom Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2000 included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                      Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 26, 2001
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 10464 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Jazavian Palmer,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:20

- CR

- 151

- 3

Before **Davis, Jones,** and **Elrod,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *
The attorney appointed to represent Jazavian Palmer has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Palmer has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 10, 2021 Lyle W. C ayce Clerk Case: 21-10464 Document: 00516088510 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/10/2021No. 21

- 10464

2 relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Palmer ’s
response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Ac cordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R** 

**.** 42. 2. Case: 21-10464 Document: 00516088510 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/10/2021
#### MUNTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a corporation, Appellant, v. *J. J.*O’LEARY, Deputy Commissioner, Fourteenth Compensation District, U. S. Department of Labor, Appellee.

No. 14451.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 8, 1955.

Ralph E. Franklin, Seattle, Wash., for appellants.

Stuart Rothman, Sol. of Labor, Ward E. Boote, Asst. Sol. of Labor, Herbert P. Miller, Atty., Dept, of Labor, Washington, D. C., Charles P. Moriarty, U. S. Atty., Leonard Ware, Edward J. McCormick, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., Seattle, Wash., for appellee.

Before STEPHENS, HEALY and FEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case arose on a petition for judicial review of a compensation order made by appellee, Deputy Commissioner, pursuant to the provisions of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq., as made applicable to employment at certain defense areas by 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1651-54.

The Deputy Commissioner awarded compensation to the wife and dependents of one Ellis, an employee of appellant, who was accidentally killed while helping to roll a log off a railroad right of *417way. Appellant was the prime contractor in the construction of the railroad, and in connection therewith Sparling Steel Company had a subcontract for the removal of an old railroad bridge and the construction of a new one. The question in the case is whether or not Ellis was acting at the time as a “loaned” servant of Sparling. The Deputy Commissioner found that Ellis’ injury and death arose out of and in the course of his employment by appellant. The trial court refused to disturb the finding arid the consequent award, hence this appeal.

The factual situation is obscure and there is no need to develop it in detail. Ellis was concededly appellant’s employee, and there is no sufficient showing of his transfer to an employee-employer relationship with Sparling. Indeed the record affords some reason for believing that the work he was doing at the moment of his death was a part of appellant’s obligation under its contract. The finding of the Deputy Commissioner is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole, and the judgment below must be affirmed.

Affirmed.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-122 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, September 16, 1996)

NRC ISSUES INITIAL CERTIFICATION DECISION

FOR URANIUM ENRICHMENT PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its

initial certification decision to the U.S. Enrichment Corporation

(USEC) for uranium enrichment plants located near Paducah,

Kentucky, and Piketon, Ohio.

USEC, or certain persons whose interest may be affected, may

file a petition requesting Commission review of the initial

decision to issue a certificate. This petition must be filed

within 15 days after a notice of the preliminary decision is

published in the Federal Register (expected about September 19).

If no petitions are received, the Director, NRC Office of

Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, will sign and issue the

certificates. If challenging petitions are received, the

Commission will review them and determine what action to take.

The two enrichment plants are owned, and were formerly

operated, by the Department of Energy. USEC now operates them

under a lease from DOE. The plants use a gaseous diffusion

process to enrich uranium hexafluoride gas in the uranium-235

isotope, so that the material can be used as nuclear fuel in

civilian nuclear power plants.

The Energy Policy Act of 1992, which established USEC, also

required the NRC to establish a certification process and

standards for the plants. NRC is to certify the facilities

periodically for compliance with the standards, which include

procedural, radiological health, safety, safeguards, and security

requirements. This is the initial certification.

NRC has reviewed USEC's application for certification and

additional information submitted, in response to NRC questions,

as well as public comments received. It concluded that there is

reasonable assurance that continued operation of the plants will

not constitute an undue risk to public health and safety, the

environment, and the common defense and security, and that the

application meets NRC requirements.

After a transition period following issuance of the
certificates, regulatory authority over plant operations would be

transferred from DOE to the NRC on March 3, 1997, unless the

Commission directs otherwise after reviewing any petitions filed.

The certificates will be effective until December 31, 1998. USEC

must apply for certificate renewal by April 15, 1998.

####
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Michael B. Wheeler, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Tufco Technologies, Inc.,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tufco Technologies, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2005     /s/ Michael B. Wheeler     Michael B. Wheeler  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                                     SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

                              HYPERCOM CORPORATION

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF ENTITY                                                     JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION
--------------                                                     ----------------------------
<C>  <S>                                                           <C>
 1.  Hypercom (Arizona), Inc. ...................................             Arizona
 2.  Hypercom U.S.A., Inc. ......................................            Delaware
 3.  Hypercom Latino America, Inc. ..............................             Arizona
 4.  Hypercom Manufacturing Resources, Inc. .....................             Arizona
 5.  Hypercom do Brasil Industria e Comercio Limitada............              Brazil
 6.  Hypercom Asia Ltd. .........................................           Hong Kong
 7.  Hypercom Australia Pty., Ltd. ..............................           Australia
 8.  Hypercom Europe Limited, Inc. ..............................             Arizona
 9.  Hypercom FSC, Inc. .........................................            Barbados
10.  Hypercom Financial, Inc. ...................................             Arizona
11.  Hypercom Net Transactions, Pty. Ltd. .......................           Australia
12.  Hypercom Hungary KFT........................................             Hungary
13.  Hypercom Network Systems Ltd. ..............................           Hong Kong
14.  Hypercom Far East Ltd. .....................................           Hong Kong
15.  Hypercom Asia (Singapore) Pte Ltd. .........................           Singapore
16.  Hypercom Canada Ltd. .......................................              Canada
17.  Hypercom de Mexico..........................................              Mexico
18.  Hypercom de Argentina.......................................           Argentina
19.  Hypercom de Chile, S.A. ....................................               Chile
20.  Hypercom de Venezuela.......................................           Venezuela
21.  Hypercom Horizon, Inc. .....................................            Missouri
22.  Hypercom Transaction Network, Inc. .........................             Arizona
23.  Hypercom France S.A.R.L. ...................................              France
24.  Hypercom Thailand...........................................            Thailand
25.  Hypercom Gmbh...............................................             Germany
26.  Hypercom Financial Terminals AB.............................              Sweden
27.  Hypercom Korea..............................................               Korea
28.  Hypercom Philippines........................................         Philippines
29.  Hypercom Electronics Manufacturing (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. .....               China
30.  Hypercom China Co. Ltd. ....................................           Hong Kong
</TABLE>
#### § 107.30 Amendments to Act and regulations.

A Licensee shall be subject to all existing and future provisions of the Act and parts 107 and 112 of title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5148 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5148

         To end unemployment payments to jobless millionaires.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 30 (legislative day, November 29), 2022

   Ms. Ernst (for herself, Mr. Tester, and Mr. Braun) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To end unemployment payments to jobless millionaires.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ending Unemployment Payments to 
Jobless Millionaires Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. ENDING UNEMPLOYMENT PAYMENTS TO JOBLESS MILLIONAIRES.

    (a) Prohibition.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
Federal funds may be used to make payments of unemployment compensation 
(including such compensation under the Federal-State Extended 
Compensation Act of 1970) in a year to an individual whose adjusted 
gross income is equal to or greater than $1,000,000.
    (b) Compliance.--Any application for unemployment compensation 
shall include a form or procedure for an individual applicant to 
certify that such individual is not prohibited from receiving 
unemployment compensation pursuant to subsection (a).
    (c) Audits.--The certifications required by subsection (b) shall be 
auditable by the Department of Labor or the Government Accountability 
Office.
    (d) Effective Date.--The prohibition under subsection (a) shall 
apply to weeks of unemployment beginning on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```