EXHIBIT F

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 95-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2020 Page 1 of 4
Application No. 1 5/ 459,906

Response to Final Office Action of October 20,2017

Docket No.: 0364764036

REMARKS

Introduction

Independent claim 1 is hereby amended to incorporate all of the limitations of claim 5,

which was identified as being allowable, and all of the limitations of intervening claim 2. In view

of the amendment, claim I and claims 3,4, 6, 11, and 12 which depend therefrom are allowable.

Claims 3,4, and 6 are amended to update cross-references in view of the cancellation of claims 5

and 7.

Claim 7, which was identified as being allowable, is rewritten in independent to include all

of the recitations of previous claim I from which it depended. In view of the amendment, claim 7

and claims 8-10 which depend therefrom are allowable.

Independent claim l3 is amended to incorporate all of the limitations of claim 19, which was

identified as being allowable. In view of the amendment, claim 13 and slaims 14-16,18, and 20-22

which depend therefi'om are allowable.

Claim 17, which was identified as being allowable, is rewritten in independent to include all

of the recitations of previous claim 13 from which it depended. In view of the amendment, claim 17

and claim l9 which is amended to depend therefrom are allowable'

In view of the amendments, claims 1,3,4, and 6-22 remain pending in this application, of

which claims I,7,13, and 17 are independent.

All amendments made to the claims are fully supported by the specification as originally

filed. Hence, no new matter has been introduced.

Entry of various comments regarding the claims and/or the art, in the Office Action, should

not be construed as any acquiescence or agreement by Applicants with the stated reasoning,

regardless of whether or not these remarks specifically address any particular comment from the

Offrce Action.

Reconsideration of this application for allowance of all pending claims is hereby respectfully

requested in view of the amendments to the claims and following remarks.

DM US 87r r rs02-2.036476.0036 9

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 95-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2020 Page 2 of 4
Application N o. | 5 I 459,906

Response to Final Office Action of October 20,2017

Docket No. : 03647 6-003 6

Allowable Subiect Matter

Claims 5-10, 17, and l9 were objected to as each being dependent upon a rejected base

claim, but were identified as being allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the

limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims'

Applicants thank the Examiner for the identification of allowable subject matter in claims 5-

10, 17, and 19.

As noted above, independent claim I has been amended to incorporate all of the recitations

of allowable claim 5; allowable claim 7 is amended into independent form; claim 13 is amended to

incorporate the recitatio ns of allowable claim 19; and allowable claim 1 7 is amended into

independentform. [nviewoftheamendments,independentclaimsl,T,l3,andl9areallowable.

Claims 3,4,6,8-12,14-16, and 18-22 each depend from one of claims 1,7,13, and l9 and are

allowable for at least that reason.

Patentabititv Under 35 U.S.C. Q 103

claims 1,2,4,11-15, 18, and 20-22 were rejected under 35 u.s.c. $ 103 as being

unpatentable over Ko (U.S. Pub. No. 2016/0066123, hereinafter o'Ko") in view of Hermans (U.S.

Pub. No, 20l6l0l77458,hereinafter "Hermans"). Claims 3 and 16 were rejected under 35 U.S.C.

$ 103 as being unpatentable over Ko in view of Hermans and Lang (U.S. Publication

No. 20 1 7/0 127222, hereinafter "Lang").

The rejections are traversed on the grounds that the claims, particularly as amended herein,

are not obvious from Ko, Hermans, Lang, or combinations thereof. In particular, claims 1,7,13,

and 19 are each amended to incorporate subject matter which was identified as being allowable. ln

view of the amendments, the claims and claims 3, 4, 6,8-12, L4-76, and i8-22 which each depend

from one of claims 1,7,13, and 19 are allowable.

Applicants therefore submit that the rejections under 35 U.S.C. $ 103 are overcome and

respectfully request that the rejections be withdrawn.

Conclusion

In view of the above amendments and remarks, Applicants submit that this application

should be allowed and the case passed to issue. If there are any questions regarding this

DM_US 871 I 1502-2.036476,0036 l0

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 95-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2020 Page 3 of 4
ApplicationNo. 15/459,906 DocketNo,:036476-0036

Response to Final Office Action of October 20,2017

Amendment or the application in general, a telephone call to the undersigned would be appreciated

to expedite the prosecution of the application.

Applicant believes no fee is due with this response. Howevei, if a fee is due, please charge

our Deposit Account No. 50-0417 from which the undersigned is authorized to draw.

Respectfu lly submitted,

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP r4A

Timothee B. Doutriaux

Registration No. 68,579

500 North Capitol Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20001

Phone: (202) 7 56-8351 TBD:bp

Facsimile: (202) 7 56-8087

Date: February 2012018

Please recognize our Customer No. 20277 as

our correspondence address.

DM US 871 l rs02-2.036476.0036 11

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 95-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2020 Page 4 of 4