alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

National Communications System


National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee

AGENCY: National Communications System (NCS).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A meeting of the President's National Security 
Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC) will be held via 
conference call on Thursday, October 21, 2004, from 3 p.m. to 4 p.m. 
The NSTAC is subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Pub. 
L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II). The conference call will be 
opened to the public. The purpose of the meeting is to receive a 
briefing on:
    <bullet> Homeland Security Presidential Directive 7 (HSPD7). While 
the call is opened to the public, the public and other non-NSTAC 
members will be placed on listen only (muted) lines. For access to the 
conference bridge and meeting materials, please register with Ms. 
Daniela Christopherson at (703) 607-6217 or by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#35765d475c46415a51755b56461b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d596bda7bca6a1bab195bbb6a6fbb2baa3">[email protected]</span></a> by 5 p.m., Wednesday, October 20, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Call Ms. Kiesha Gebreyes, Chief, 
Industry Operations Branch at (703) 607-6134, or write the Manager, 
National Communications System, P.O. Box 4502, Arlington, Virginia 
22204-4502.

Peter M. Fonash,
Federal Register Certifying Officer, National Communications System.
[FR Doc. 04-23424 Filed 10-15-04; 10:42 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-51116, 33-39557, 33-39566, 333-17843) pertaining to the Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, the Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Officer Bonus Program, the Amended,
Restated and Substituted Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Stock Plan, and the Kaiser Ventures Inc. 1995 Stock Plan, as amended, respectively, of our report dated March 21, 2007 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule
of Kaiser Ventures LLC and Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Moss Adams LLP
|                  
|Irvine, California
|March 26, 2007
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Plan Your Event at Cuyahoga Valley

Cuyahoga Valley National Park
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diametrics Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Laurence L. Betterley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/     LAURENCE L. BETTERLEYLaurence L. Betterley Chief Financial Officer May 15, 2003






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Diametrics Medical, Inc. and will be retained by Diametrics
Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 22-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2020 Page 1 of 1 

7:39 PM 0.5KB/s* I (LIL* 

'0112590r 

Team Doodie Project... Q 

Bret Walley 

0 Admin • Dec 10, 2019 at 9:18 AM • lE 

_„. 

* 0 • 

0 

Fix your fucked up 

guns 

Sue shooters 

connection for selling 

you the barrels cause 

kkm called your 

bullshit 

EXHIBIT 5 

OS Shawn Wesley Knight and 11 others 79 Comments 

SCI 000641 CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-137 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
### §655. Arbitrators

(a) Powers of Arbitrators.—An arbitrator to whom an action is referred under section 654 shall have the power, within the judicial district of the district court which referred the action to arbitration—

(1) to conduct arbitration hearings;

(2) to administer oaths and affirmations; and

(3) to make awards.

(b) Standards for Certification.—Each district court that authorizes arbitration shall establish standards for the certification of arbitrators and shall certify arbitrators to perform services in accordance with such standards and this chapter. The standards shall include provisions requiring that any arbitrator—

(1) shall take the oath or affirmation described in section 453; and

(2) shall be subject to the disqualification rules under section 455.

(c) Immunity.—All individuals serving as arbitrators in an alternative dispute resolution program under this chapter are performing quasi-judicial functions and are entitled to the immunities and protections that the law accords to persons serving in such capacity.

(Added Pub. L. 100–702, title IX, §901(a), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4661; amended Pub. L. 105–315, §7, Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2996.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–315 amended section generally, substituting provisions relating to arbitrators for provisions relating to trial de novo.
Editorial Note on Part 121
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 121 appear at 72 FR 50039 and 50040, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 121.705 Must a business concern self-certify its size and eligibility status? ( a ) A business concern must self-certify that it meets the eligibility requirements set forth in § 121.702 for a Phase I or Phase II SBIR or STTR funding agreement.
( b ) A business concern that is more than 50% owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms and a joint venture where one or more parties to the joint venture is more than 50% owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms must be registered with SBA as of the date it submits its initial proposal (or other formal response) to a Phase I or Phase II SBIR announcement or solicitation. The concern must indicate in any SBIR proposal or application that it is registered with SBA as majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms.
( c ) A small business concern that did not meet the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section at the time of its SBIR proposal or application must notify the funding agreement officer if, on the date of award, the concern is more than 50% owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms. ( 1 ) The concern is still eligible to receive the award if it becomes majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms after the time it submitted its initial proposal (or other formal response) to a Phase I or Phase II SBIR announcement or solicitation if the agency makes the award on or after the date that is 9 months from the end of the period for submitting applications under the SBIR solicitation.
( 2 ) This small business, known as a covered small business concern, would have to certify that it meets the requirements of the SBIR program set forth in §§ 121.702(a)(1)(ii) or 121.702(a)(1)(iii), and 121.702(a)(2) and 121.702(c) at the time of award of the funding agreement.
( d ) A funding agreement officer may accept a concern's self-certification as true for the particular funding agreement involved in the absence of a written protest or other credible information which would cause the funding agreement officer or SBA to question the size or eligibility of the concern.
( e ) Procedures for protesting an awardee's self-certification are set forth in §§ 121.1001 through 121.1009. In adjudicating a protest, SBA may address both the size status and eligibility of the SBIR or STTR awardee.
[77 FR 76227, Dec. 27, 2012]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# Time and Date:

10 a.m., Thursday, October 21, 2004.

# Place:

Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

# Status:

Open.

# Matters to be Considered:

1. Quarterly Insurance Fund Report.

2. Final Rule: Section 701.14 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Change in Official or Senior Executive Officer in Credit Unions that are Newly Chartered or in Troubled Condition.

3. Final Rule: Part 723 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Member Business Loans.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: (703) 518-6304.

Mary Rupp,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-23406  Filed 10-14-04; 3:18 pm]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-21-00157-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-002496-1

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

DOLORES TORRES, Appellant

V.

RICK MERCADO, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On October 5, 2021, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as 

the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with 

the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the 

brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an 

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: November 4, 2021
#### Herbert E. Jones and Another, Respondents, v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment of Special Term and judgment of Buffalo City Court reversed, and a new trial granted in the Buffalo City Court, with costs in all courts to appellant to abide event. Hew trial to be had on the 10th day of June, 1914, at ten A. M. Held, that the plaintiff failed to prove that the grape fruit was in good condition when received by defendant for shipment over its railroad, or that the damaged condition of the fruit when received by the consignee at Buffalo was due to any neglect on the part of the defendant. All concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           1-MO
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-29-2000
<CASH>                                   5,462,520
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            6,209,525
<ALLOWANCES>                             1,026,775
<INVENTORY>                                189,201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        13,923,345
<PP&E>                                   9,285,329
<DEPRECIATION>                           7,261,608
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          16,327,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   10,517,336
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   106,632
<OTHER-SE>                               5,564,558
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            16,327,415
<SALES>                                 11,224,110
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       156,746,967
<CGS>                                    1,952,283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            5,376,255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        14,171,869
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          44,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (4,064,506)
<INCOME-TAX>                                45,396
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      4,109,902
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (4,109,902)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.400)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.400)


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.805 After the appeal petition is filed. ( a ) The AA/OHA will assign a Judge to adjudicate the case. If mediation is requested or offered, the AA/OHA will assign a different person to mediate the case.
( b ) OHA will issue and serve upon the Employee and the SBA a notice and order informing the parties that an appeal has been filed, and setting the date for SBA's response and the close of record.
( c ) The rules for amendments to pleadings and supplemental pleadings are in § 134.207.
( d ) Unless otherwise instructed, OHA will serve all orders and the decision by email upon the Employee, or upon the attorney if represented by an attorney.
[75 FR 47443, Aug. 6, 2010, as amended at 82 FR 25507, June 2, 2017]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Eye Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Career development award applications.                    

*Date:*                         November 1, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Eye Institute, Division of Extramural Research, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Anne E. Schaffner, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye Institute, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, MSC 9300, Bethesda, MD 20892-9300, (301) 451-2020,                         *aes@nei.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 12, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-23337  Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### §466. Additional rights and remedies; exclusive jurisdiction of district court; res judicata

The rights and remedies provided by this subchapter shall be in addition to any and all other rights and remedies at law or in equity: Provided, That upon the filing of a complaint by the Secretary the jurisdiction of the district court over such trusteeship shall be exclusive and the final judgment shall be res judicata.

(Pub. L. 86–257, title III, §306, Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 532.)
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23352]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Mine Safety and Health Administration


Petitions for Modification

    The following parties have filed petitions to modify the 
application of existing safety standards under section 101(c) of the 
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977.

1. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Company

[Docket No. M-2004-042-C]

    Synergy Engineering Services, PLLC, 34 First Street, Foxbottom, 
Harold, Kentucky 41635, Permit <greek-i>1201764, has filed a petition 
for modification for the Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Company, P.O. Box 
196, Hurley, Virginia 24620, to modify the application of 30 CFR 
77.214(a) (Refuse piles; general) for the Devils Branch Blair 
<greek-i>1 Mine (MSHA I.D. No. 44-07014), and the Devils Branch Blair 
<greek-i>2 Mine (MSHA I.D. No. 44-07032) located in Buchanan County, 
Virginia. The petitioner proposes to backfill two existing underground 
mine face-ups, Blair <greek-i>1 and Blair <greek-i>2, with coarse scalp 
rock material generated from an adjacent underground mine. The Blair 
<greek-i>1 Mine is still active, and will be backfilled once mining is 
complete; the Blair <greek-i>2 Mine has been mined out and abandoned. A 
total of four entries exist in both the Blair <greek-i>1 and Blair 
<greek-i>2 Mine, and all entries are located in the Blair coal seam at 
approximately 1395 feet elevation. The petitioner has listed specific 
procedures in this petition that would be followed to seal the mine 
openings. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method 
would not diminish the level of protection provided to the miners.

Request for Comments

    Persons interested in these petitions are encouraged to submit 
comments via Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov; E-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2665494b4b43485255666b756e6708414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3c7f5351515952484f7c716f747d125b534a">[email protected]</span></a>; Fax: (202) 693-9441; or Regular Mail/Hand 
Delivery/Courier: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Office of 
Standards, Regulations, and Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
2350, Arlington, Virginia 22209. All comments must be postmarked or 
received in that office on or before November 18, 2004. Copies of these 
petitions are available for inspection at that address.

    Dated at Arlington, Virginia, this 13th day of October, 2004.
Marvin W. Nichols, Jr.,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
[FR Doc. 04-23352 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-43-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §2653. Encouragement of more generous leave policies

Nothing in this Act or any amendment made by this Act shall be construed to discourage employers from adopting or retaining leave policies more generous than any policies that comply with the requirements under this Act or any amendment made by this Act.

(Pub. L. 103–3, title IV, §403, Feb. 5, 1993, 107 Stat. 26.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 103–3, Feb. 5, 1993, 107 Stat. 6, known as the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, which enacted this chapter, sections 60m and 60n of Title 2, The Congress, and sections 6381 to 6387 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, amended section 2105 of Title 5, and enacted provisions set out as notes under section 2601 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2601 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 6 months after Feb. 5, 1993, see section 405(b)(1) of Pub. L. 103–3, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Adolph Rible.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.