alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 590 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 590

To establish limitations regarding Confucius Institutes, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 4, 2021

 Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Hawley, Mrs. 
 Blackburn, and Mr. Marshall) introduced the following bill; which was 
        read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish limitations regarding Confucius Institutes, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Concerns Over Nations Funding 
University Campus Institutes in the United States Act'' or the 
``CONFUCIUS Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS ON CONFUCIUS INSTITUTES.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Confucius Institute'' 
means a cultural institute directly or indirectly funded by the 
Government of the People's Republic of China.
    (b) Restrictions on Confucius Institutes.--An institution of higher 
education or other postsecondary educational institution (referred to 
in this section as an ``institution'') shall not be eligible to receive 
Federal funds from the Department of Education (except funds under 
title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.) 
or other Department of Education funds that are provided directly to 
students) unless the institution ensures that any contract or agreement 
between the institution and a Confucius Institute includes clear 
provisions that--
            (1) protect academic freedom at the institution;
            (2) prohibit the application of any foreign law on any 
        campus of the institution; and
            (3) grant full managerial authority of the Confucius 
        Institute to the institution, including full control over what 
        is being taught, the activities carried out, the research 
        grants that are made, and who is employed at the Confucius 
        Institute.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-2151

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Tiffany McAllister

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

 ____________

 Submitted: June 17, 2022

Filed: June 27, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Tiffany McAllister appeals after the district court1 denied her motion for

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1), as modified by the First

1The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.
Step Act, based on her medical issues, the conditions and medical care available to

her within the Bureau of Prisons, and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

We review de novo the applicability of the First Step Act to a defendant’s case,

and we review the district court’s decision to deny an authorized reduction for an

abuse of discretion. United States v. Vangh, 990 F.3d 1138, 1141 (8th Cir. 2021). 

We decline to decide whether McAllister’s refusal to receive an effective vaccine and

other treatment that would reduce the risk of serious consequences after she

contracted COVID-19 made her ineligible for First Step Act Compassionate Release

Relief. We discern no abuse of discretion in the denial based on the other

justifications provided by the district court, including that she had not established that

the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) weighed in favor of early release. See United

States v. Marcussen, 15 F.4th 855, 857-59 (8th Cir. 2021) (concluding that district

court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for release based on its weighing

of § 3553(a) factors, because court acknowledged mitigating factors but determined

that they did not justify release); see also United States v. Howard, 962 F.3d 1013,

1015 (8th Cir. 2020) (affirming denial of motion for reduction under First Step Act

because, even if district court erred regarding movant’s eligibility, district court also

determined that it would not exercise its discretion to grant relief, and thus further

proceedings would be futile).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
§ 334.6 Department and agency responsibilities. ( a ) During Stage 3, each Federal department and agency with mobilization responsibilities will develop GMR plans as part of its emergency preparedness planning process in order to meet possible future crisis. Costed Option Packages will be developed for actions that may be necessary in the early warning period. Option packages will be reviewed, focused and refined during Stage 2 to meet the particular emergency.
( b ) Each department and agency should identify response actions appropriate for the early stage of any crisis or emergency situation, which then will be reviewed, focused and refined in Stage 2 for execution, as appropriate. GMR plans should contain a menu of costed option packages that provide details of alternative measures that may be used in an emergency situation.
( c ) FEMA will provide guidance pursuant to Executive Order 12656 and will coordinate GMR plans and option packages of DOD and the civilian departments and agencies to ensure consistency and to identify areas where additional planning or investment is needed.
( d ) During State 2, FEMA will coordinate department and agency recommendations for action and forward them to the National Security Advisor to make certain that consistency with the overall national strategy planning is achieved.
( e ) Departments and agencies will refine their GMR plans to focus on the specific crisis situation. Costed option packages should be refined to identify the resources necessary for the current crisis, action taken to obtain those resources, and GMR plans implemented consistent with the seriousness of the crisis.
( f ) At Stage 1, declaration of national emergency or war, the crisis is under the control of NSC or other central authority, with GMR being integrated into partial, full or total mobilization. At this point the more traditional mechanisms of resource mobilization are pursued, focusing on resource allocation and adjudication with cognizance of the essential civilian demand.
( g ) Programs and plans developed by the departments and agencies under this guidance should be shared, as appropriate, with States, local governments and the private sector to provide a baseline for their development of supporting programs and plans.
Order entered November 14, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01144-CV

GREAT HANS, LLC, Appellant

V.

LIBERTY BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE CO., Appellee

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-12254

ORDER

On the Court’s own motion, we REMOVE this appeal from submission on November 

27, 2018. The appeal will be resubmitted in the first quarter of 2019. 

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of TransAlta Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen G. Snyder,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.              The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Stephen G.  Snyder                 |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen G.  Snyder                     |   |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                   |   |
| Dated:  February 24, 2010.   |   |

 

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.

 

----
### §1183. Guaranteed renewability in multiemployer plans and multiple employer welfare arrangements

A group health plan which is a multiemployer plan or which is a multiple employer welfare arrangement may not deny an employer whose employees are covered under such a plan continued access to the same or different coverage under the terms of such a plan, other than—

(1) for nonpayment of contributions;

(2) for fraud or other intentional misrepresentation of material fact by the employer;

(3) for noncompliance with material plan provisions;

(4) because the plan is ceasing to offer any coverage in a geographic area;

(5) in the case of a plan that offers benefits through a network plan, there is no longer any individual enrolled through the employer who lives, resides, or works in the service area of the network plan and the plan applies this paragraph uniformly without regard to the claims experience of employers or any health status-related factor in relation to such individuals or their dependents; and

(6) for failure to meet the terms of an applicable collective bargaining agreement, to renew a collective bargaining or other agreement requiring or authorizing contributions to the plan, or to employ employees covered by such an agreement.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §703, as added Pub. L. 104–191, title I, §101(a), Aug. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 1946.)
### **CHAPTER 16—CONGRESSIONAL MAILING STANDARDS**

Sec.
501.
House Communications Standards Commission.
502.
Select Committee on Standards and Conduct of the Senate.
503.
Official mail of persons entitled to use congressional frank.
504.
Mass mailings by Senate offices; quarterly statements; publication of summary tabulations.
505.
Mass mailing of information by Senators under frank; quarterly registration with Secretary of Senate.
506.
Mass mailing sent by House Members.
### §543. Special attorneys

(a) The Attorney General may appoint attorneys to assist United States attorneys when the public interest so requires, including the appointment of qualified tribal prosecutors and other qualified attorneys to assist in prosecuting Federal offenses committed in Indian country.

(b) Each attorney appointed under this section is subject to removal by the Attorney General.

(c) Indian Country.—In this section, the term "Indian country" has the meaning given that term in section 1151 of title 18.

(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(c), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 618; amended Pub. L. 111–211, title II, §213(a)(1), July 29, 2010, 124 Stat. 2268.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (a) | 28 U.S.C. 503. | [None]. |
| | 5 U.S.C. 298. | July 28, 1916, ch. 261, §1 (6th par. on p. 413), 39 Stat. 413. |
| (b) | 28 U.S.C. 504(b) (2d sentence, less applicability to assistant United States attorneys). | [None]. |

Statutes at Large

The text of former section 298 of title 5 is omitted as unnecessary. The position so authorized has not been filled in recent years, and the authority is preserved by this section and revised section 3101 of title 5, United States Code.

In subsection (b), the word "is" is substituted for "shall be".

#### 1948 Act

Prior section 503.—Based on section 312 of title 5, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees (R.S. §363).

Other provisions of section 312 of title 5, U.S.C., 1940 ed., are incorporated in sections 507 [now 509 and 547] and 508 [now 548] of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 543, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 911, related to oath of office for United States Marshals, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), and reenactment in section 563 of this title by section 4(c) of Pub. L. 89–554.

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–211, §213(a)(1)(A), inserted ", including the appointment of qualified tribal prosecutors and other qualified attorneys to assist in prosecuting Federal offenses committed in Indian country" before period at end.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 111–211, §213(a)(1)(B), added subsec. (c).
#### WELCH, Appellant, v. ZUBER et al., Respondents.

(201 N. W. 159.)

(File No. 5354.

Opinion filed December 2, 1924.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Potter County.

*Robert B. F'isk,*of Gettysburg, for Appellant.

*D. J. O'Keefe,*of Pierre, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Notice of appeal, from the judgment and order denying a new trial, and cost bond were served on respondent and filed with the clerk of courts of Potter county on March 17, 1923. Numerous stipulations were thereafter filed, extending, from time to time, the time in which appellant was to serve and file brief up to June 5, 1924. Since that time no extension of time has been obtained,, and. no other proceeding had or paper filed in this court.

Appellant having failed to comply with rules 5, 6, 7, and 13 of this court, relating to appeals, this appeal is deemed abandoned, and the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed..
IC 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 559 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2022 

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

S 559 RFH

1 SECTION 1. GRAND RONDE RESERVATION ACT AMEND2 MENT. 

3 Section 1(d) of Public Law 100–425 (commonly 

4 known as the ‘‘Grand Ronde Reservation Act’’) (102 Stat. 

5 1594) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘lands within 

7 the State of Oregon’’ and inserting ‘‘the 84 acres 

8 known as the Thompson Strip’’; 

9 (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para10 graph (3); and 

11 (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol12 lowing: 

13 ‘‘(2) GAMING PROHIBITION.—Any real property 

14 obtained by the Tribes as part of a land claim settle15 ment approved by the United States shall not be eli16 gible, or used, for any class II gaming or class III 

17 gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act 

18 (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) (as those terms are defined 

19 in section 4 of that Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)).’’. 

20 SEC. 2. TREATY RIGHTS OF FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED 

21 TRIBES. 

22 Nothing in this Act, or an amendment made by this 

23 Act, shall be construed to enlarge, confirm, adjudicate, af24 fect, or modify any treaty right of an Indian Tribe (as 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

S 559 RFH

1 defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and 

2 Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304)). 

Passed the Senate May 26, 2021. 

Attest: SONCERIA ANN BERRY, 

Secretary. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
null

2007-12-05

208.97543

eng - Argued: 2007-12-05. Docket number: 2007-1220Pt1
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-182 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, October 8, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor

Safeguards has scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on Planning and Procedures

on November 4 in Rockville, Maryland.

The subcommittee will meet from 10:00 a.m. until noon in Room T-2B1 of the

NRC’s Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. The subcommittee will

discuss proposed ACRS activities and qualifications of candidates for appointment to

the Committee.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for public comment, will

be described in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
     KOWTOW, INC.  June 30, 1997  financial  statements and
     is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894501
<NAME>                        KOWTOW, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
M&I 2008 Sch A-10 F.Z10.XLS

1/25/2008

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF ESTIMATED M&I PROJECT USE ENERGY COSTS

STORAGE, CONVEYANCE, AND OUT-OF-BASIN PUMPING

2008 M&I WATER RATES

Projected

2008 Storage Pumping SFU Conveyance Pumping 

Deliveries Columbia Folsom Gianelli WR Gianelli WR Dos Amigos O'Neill Jones 

Facility/Contractor (Sch. A-12) Mowry Pump Plant Pump-Gen Plt Pump-Gen Plt Pump Plant Pump-Gen Plt Pump PlaCross Valley Canal 4/

 County of Fresno County of Tulare Total CVCDelta-Mendota Canal Byron-Bethany ID 1,040 1,04 City of Tracy 9,610 9,61 Del Puerto WD 20 2 Department of Veterans Affairs 70 7 Panoche WD - DMC 27 2 San Luis WD - DMC 180 18 Total DMC 10,948 10,94Delta-Mendota Exchange 75,084 75,08

Folsom Dam & Reservoir

 City of Roseville 29,042 29,042 Sacramento County WD 4,250 4,250 San Juan WD 6,588 6,588 Total Folsom D&R 39,879 39,879San Luis Canal - Fresno 1/ City of Avenal 2,746 1,922 2,746 2,746 2,74 City of Coalinga 7,213 5,049 7,213 7,213 7,21 City of Huron 1,274 892 1,274 1,274 1,27 State of CA 10 7 10 10 1 Westlands WD 3,020 2,114 3,020 3,020 3,02 Total SLC - Fresno 14,262 9,984 14,262 14,262 14,26San Luis Canal - Tracy 1/ Broadview WD 5/ Pacheco WD -SLC 14 10 14 14 1 Panoche WD - SLC 58 41 58 58 5 San Luis WD - SLC 620 434 35 2/ 620 62 Total SLC - Tracy 692 484 107 692 69
M&I 2008 Sch A-10 F.Z10.XLS 

1/25/2008 

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF ESTIMATED M&I PROJECT USE ENERGY COSTS

STORAGE, CONVEYANCE, AND OUT-OF-BASIN PUMPING

2008 M&I WATER RATES

Projected

2008 Storage Pumping SFU Conveyance Pumping 

Deliveries Columbia Folsom Gianelli WR Gianelli WR Dos Amigos O'Neill Jones 

Facility/Contractor (Sch. A-12) Mowry Pump Plant Pump-Gen Plt Pump-Gen Plt Pump Plant Pump-Gen Plt Pump PlaSan Felipe Unit

 San Benito County WD 4,351 4,351 4,351 4,35 Santa Clara Valley WD 93,009 93,009 93,009 93,00 Total SFU 97,360 97,360 97,360 97,36 Total Deliveries 238,225 39,879 10,468 97,360 14,369 112,314 198,34 Estimated 2008 Project Use Energy Costs $1,314 $34,885 $32,056 $298,145 $37,216 $134,757 $811,53 Less - Regeneration Credit 

 Gianelli WR Pump-Gen Plt ($29,501) O'Neill Pump-Gen Plt ($70)

 Net Project Use Energy Costs $2,555 $134,686
M&I 2008 Sch A-10 F.Z10.XLS

1/25/2008

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF ESTIMATED M&I PROJECT USE ENERGY COSTS

STORAGE, CONVEYANCE, AND OUT-OF-BASIN PUMPING

2008 M&I WATER RATES

FOOTNOTES

1/ According to MP-2810 (CB 06/93) only 70% of San Luis Canal Deliveries are stored in B.F.Sisk San Luis Reservoir

and, therefore, require pumping by the WR Gianelli Pump-Generator.

2/ Excludes estimated San Luis WD deliveries before Dos Amigos. The calculation reflects the relationship between actual deliveries

versus actual exclusions over a five year period ( 620 - 585 = 35 ) Refer to M&I 2008 Sch. A-11.Z10.xls.

3/ Only 50% of Santa Clara Valley WD's deliveries require pumping through Coyote PP.4/ Cross Valley Canal costs for the Dos Amigos PP PUE O&M will be included under direct pumping (see Schedule A-11).5/ The contractor is not included in the water rate calculations due to the assignment agreement effective March 1, 2007.
#### § 295.11 Deadline for notifying FEMA of losses.

The deadline for filing a Notice of Loss is August 28, 2002. Except as provided in § 295.21(d) with respect to mitigation and in § 295.31(b) with respect to the lump sum payment described therein, a Loss that has not been described: on a Notice of Loss, on a supplement to a Notice of Loss or a request to supplement a Notice of Loss under § 295.33, or a request to reopen a claim under § 295.34, received by OCGFC on or before August 28, 2002 cannot be compensated under the CGFAA. The CGFAA establishes this deadline and does not provide any extensions of the filing deadline.