CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

i 4138-3124-7415.1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-22945-CIV-SCOLA/TORRES 

CARNIVAL CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DECURTIS CORPORATION and 

DECURTIS LLC 

Defendants. 

DECURTIS LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CARNIVAL CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

CARNIVAL CORPORATION’S RESPONSE TO DECURTIS’ STATEMENT OF FACTS 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 1 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

i 4138-3124-7415.1 

Index of Exhibits 

Exhibit 

No. 

Description ECF 

No. 

Confidentiality Name for ECF Filing 

134 Exhibit 3 (Back Up) to the 

Opening Expert Report of 

Mary Coleman, Ph.D. dated 

March 1, 2022 (Original 

Produced in Native Format) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 134 – Exhibit 3 

(Back Up) to Coleman 

Report 

135 PDF of Excel Spreadsheet 

(DeCurtis_01602071) 

(Original Produced in Native 

Format) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 135 - Excel 

Spreadsheet 

(DeCurtis_01602071) 

136 PDF of Excel Spreadsheet 

(DeCurtis_01860190) 

(Original Produced in Native 

Format) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 136 - Excel 

Spreadsheet 

(DeCurtis_01860190) 

137 PDF of Excerpt of Excel 

Spreadsheet 

(DeCurtis_01961733) 

(Original Produced in Native 

Format) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 137 - Excel 

Spreadsheet 

(DeCurtis_01961733) 

138 DeCurtis Holdings LLC 

Company Information 

(SHAMROCK_00004187-

4188) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 138 – 

SHAMROCK_00004187-

4188 

139 Email Chain from Blias, 

Halpert, Lieberman & Greene 

LLC dated March 28, 2019 

(DeCurtis_01859589-903) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 139 - Email chain 

dated March 28, 2019 

(DeCurtis_01859589-

903) 

140 Statement of Work between 

Level 11 and DeCurtis Corp. 

dated May 1, 2018 

(DeCurtis_01962521-524)

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 140 - Statement 

of Work 

(DeCurtis_01962521-

524) 

141 Evercore Project Ocean 

Presentation dated February 

2021 (EVR0002231-2242) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 141 – Project 

Ocean document 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 2 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

ii 4138-3124-7415.1 

142 Transcript of Deposition of 

Jon Engbretsen dated 

December 21, 2021 

(“Engbretsen Dep.”) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 142 - Jon 

Engbretsen Deposition 

(Dec. 21, 2021) 

143 

(DeCurtis_00807542-559) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 143 - 

144 U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 

US2016/0055697 (“Raina”) 

Exhibit 144 - U.S. Pat. 

Pub. No. 

US2016/0055697 

145 

 (DeCurtis_00704194-

212) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 145 – 

146 DeCurtis Corp. Transaction 

Report (DeCurtis_01992624) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 146 - DeCurtis 

Corp. Transaction Report 

147 Email Chain between 

DeCurtis, Virgin, and Assa 

Abloy with attachment dated 

March 29, 2019 

(DeCurtis_00808683-697) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 147 - Email 

Chain between DeCurtis, 

Virgin, and Assa Abloy 

(March 29, 2019) 

148 Email Chain between 

DeCurtis, Virgin, and Assa 

Abloy dated November 22, 

2019 (DeCurtis_00725842-

845) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 148 - Email 

Chain between DeCurtis, 

Virgin, and Assa Abloy 

(Nov. 22, 2019) 

149 Internal DeCurtis Email dated 

March 11, 2020 

(DeCurtis_01620105-114) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 149 – Internal 

DeCurtis Email (March 

11, 2020) 

150 Non-Infringement, 

Unenforceability, and 

Invalidity Contentions of 

DeCurtis LLC and DeCurtis 

Corporation, October 29, 

2020, at Exhibit 184-A 

Invalidity Claim Chart for 

U.S. Patent No. 10,045,184 

Exhibit 150 - Exhibit 

184-A, Invalidity Claim 

Chart for U.S. Patent No. 

10,045,184 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 3 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

iii 4138-3124-7415.1 

(“the ’184 patent”) 

151 Non-Infringement, 

Unenforceability, and 

Invalidity Contentions of 

DeCurtis LLC and DeCurtis 

Corporation, October 29, 

2020, at Exhibit 516-A 

Invalidity Claim Chart for 

U.S. Patent No. 10,049,516 

(“the ’516 patent”) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 151 - Exhibit 

516-A Invalidity Claim 

Chart for U.S. Patent No. 

10,049,516 

152 

 (DeCurtis_01891932-

940) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 152 - 

153 

(DeCurtis_00729853-854) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 153 - 

154 Internal DeCurtis Email dated 

July 5, 2020 

(DeCurtis_01828250-273) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 154 – Internal 

DeCurtis Email (July 5, 

2020) 

155 Email Chain between 

DeCurtis, Virgin, and Assa 

Abloy dated November 4, 

2019 (DeCurtis_00727448-

449) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 155 - Email 

Chain between DeCurtis, 

Virgin, and Assa Abloy 

(Nov. 4, 2019) 

156 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 156 - 

157 DeCurtis LLC’s Notice of 

Subpoenas to Third Party 

Assa Abloy Global Solutions, 

Inc. dated October 8, 2020 

Exhibit 157 - DeCurtis 

LLC’s Notice of 

Subpoenas to Third Party 

Assa Abloy Global 

Solutions, Inc. (Oct. 8, 

2020) 

158 Email Chain between 

DeCurtis, Virgin, and Assa 

Abloy dated May 8, 2020 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 158 - Email 

Chain between DeCurtis, 

Virgin, and Assa Abloy

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 4 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

iv 4138-3124-7415.1 

(DeCurtis_01889600-610) (May 8, 2020) 

159 Internal DeCurtis Email dated 

May 22, 2018 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 159 – Internal 

DeCurtis Email (May 22, 

2018) 

160 First Amended. Answers of 

DeCurtis LLC and DeCurtis 

Corp. to Carnival’s First Set 

of Interrogatories dated 

September 23, 2020 

Exhibit 160 - First 

Amended. Answers of 

DeCurtis LLC and 

DeCurtis Corp. to 

Carnival’s First Set of 

Interrogatories (Sept. 23, 

2020) 

161 Email Chain between 

DeCurtis, Virgin, and Assa 

Abloy with attachments dated 

September 13, 2018 

(DeCurtis_01496843-896) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 161 - Email 

Chain between DeCurtis, 

Virgin, and Assa Abloy 

with attachments (Sept. 

13, 2018) 

162 Internal DeCurtis Email dated 

October 23, 2020 

(DeCurtis_00829416) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 162 – Internal 

DeCurtis Email (Oct. 23, 

2020) 

163 Email from Andrew Nordahl 

to Carnival Counsel dated 

March 30, 2022 

Exhibit 163 – Nordahl 

Email dated March 30, 

2022 

164 Email Chain between 

DeCurtis and Shamrock dated 

October 12, 2019 

(DeCurtis_01630715-721) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 164 - Email 

Chain between DeCurtis 

and Shamrock (Oct. 12, 

2019) 

165 

 dated August 16, 

2018 (DeCurtis_00771718) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 165 - 

 (Aug. 16, 2018) 

166 

 dated 

August 21, 2018 

(DeCurtis_01497954) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 166 - 

(Aug. 21, 2018) 

167 

 dated 

August 21, 2018 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 167 - 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 5 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

v 4138-3124-7415.1 

(DeCurtis_01497877) (Aug. 21, 2018) 

168 

 dated 

August 22, 2018 

(DeCurtis_01498261-263) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 168 - 

(Aug. 22, 2018) 

169 

 dated August 23, 

2018 (DeCurtis_01486571-

574) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 169 - 

 (Aug. 23, 2018) 

170 

 dated September 6, 

2018 (DeCurtis_01486355-

359) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 170 - 

 (Sept. 6, 2018) 

171 

 dated September 

11, 2018 

(DeCurtis_01497112-114) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 171 - 

 (Sept. 11, 2018) 

172 

 dated November 4, 

2019 (DeCurtis_00727448-

449) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 172 - 

 (Nov. 4, 2019) 

173 Email from Virgin to DeCurtis 

dated November 4, 2019 

(DeCurtis_00727426) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 173 - Email from 

Virgin to DeCurtis (Nov. 

4, 2019) 

174 

 dated 

November 13, 2019 

(DeCurtis_00726714) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 174 - 

(Nov. 13, 2019) 

175 Email Chain with attachment 

from dated 

October 31, 2019 

(DeCurtis_00727629-632) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 175 - Email 

Chain with attachment 

from 

(October 31, 2019) 

176 Email from DeCurtis dated 

November 22, 2019 

 Highly Exhibit 176 - Email from 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 6 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

vi 4138-3124-7415.1 

(DeCurtis_00732035) Confidential DeCurtis (Nov. 22, 2019) 

177 Email from Virgin dated 

November 28, 2019 

(DeCurtis_00725650-653) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 177 - Email from 

Virgin (Nov. 28, 2019) 

178 

 dated 

December 2, 2019 

(DeCurtis_00725555) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 178 - 

(Dec. 2, 2019) 

179 Email between DeCurtis and 

Virgin dated December 4, 

2019 (DeCurtis_01149361) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 179 - Email 

between DeCurtis and 

Virgin (Dec. 4, 2019) 

180 

 dated December 5, 

2019 (DeCurtis_00725305-

315) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 180 - 

 (Dec. 5, 2019) 

181 Email Chain between 

DeCurtis, Assa Abloy, and 

Virgin dated December 9, 

2019 (DeCurtis_00725136-

138) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 181 - Email 

Chain between DeCurtis, 

Assa Abloy, and Virgin 

(Dec. 9, 2019) 

182 

 dated December 

13, 2019 

(DeCurtis_00724515-518) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 182 - 

 (Dec. 13, 2019) 

183 Email Chain between Assa 

Abloy and DeCurtis dated 

December 16, 2019 

(DeCurtis_00724328-332) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 183 - Email 

Chain between Assa 

Abloy and DeCurtis (Dec. 

16, 2019) 

184 Email Chain between 

DeCurtis and Assa Abloy 

dated December 20, 2019 

(DeCurtis_00723025-026) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 184 - Email 

Chain between DeCurtis 

and Assa Abloy (Dec. 20, 

2019) 

185 Email Chain between Virgin 

and DeCurtis dated May 23, 

2016 (DeCurtis_01737705-

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 185 - Email 

Chain between Virgin 

and DeCurtis (May 23, 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 7 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

vii 4138-3124-7415.1 

711) 2016) 

186 Email Chain between 

DeCurtis and Virgin dated 

May 26, 2017 

(DeCurtis_01714498-499) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 186 - Email 

Chain between DeCurtis 

and Virgin (May 26, 

2017) 

187 Email Chain between Virgin 

and DeCurtis dated July 28, 

2017 (DeCurtis_01789849-

850) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 187 - Email 

Chain between Virgin 

and DeCurtis (July 28, 

2017) 

188 Email with attachments 

between Virgin and DeCurtis 

dated November 1, 2015 

(DeCurtis_01882229-239) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 188 - Email 

between Virgin and 

DeCurtis (Nov. 1, 2015) 

189 Email with attachments from 

DeCurtis dated February 14, 

2020 (DeCurtis_01794598-

602) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 189 – Email from 

DeCurtis (Feb. 14, 2020) 

190 Email Chain with attachment 

between DeCurtis and Virgin 

dated January 17, 2017 

(DeCurtis_01508675-678) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 190 – Email 

between DeCurtis and 

Virgin (Jan. 17, 2017) 

191 Email from DeCurtis dated 

June 6, 2016 

(DeCurtis_01717949-951) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 191 – Email from 

DeCurtis (June 6, 2016) 

192 Internal DeCurtis Email with 

attachment dated June 2, 2016 

(DeCurtis_00366919-923) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 192 – Internal 

DeCurtis email (June 2, 

2016) 

193 Email from DeCurtis dated 

May 17, 2018 

(DeCurtis_01891918-931) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 193 – Email from 

DeCurtis (May 17, 2018) 

194 

(DeCurtis_01946098-151) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 194 - 

 (Nov. 2018) 

195 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 195 - 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 8 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

viii 4138-3124-7415.1 

 (DeCurtis_01987959-

976) 

196 Internal DeCurtis Email dated 

September 13, 2016 

(DeCurtis_00366787-791) 

Exhibit 196 - Internal 

DeCurtis Email (Sept. 13, 

2016) 

197 Internal DeCurtis Email with 

attachment dated September 

21, 2016 

(DeCurtis_01957804-809) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 197 – Internal 

DeCurtis Email (Sept. 21, 

2016) 

198 Internal DeCurtis Email dated 

November 8, 2016 

(DeCurtis_00689388) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 198 – Internal 

DeCurtis Email (Nov. 8, 

2016) 

199 Internal DeCurtis Email dated 

November 15, 2016 

(DeCurtis_01035787) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 199 – Internal 

DeCurtis Email (Nov. 15, 

2016) 

200 Internal DeCurtis Email Chain 

dated February 7, 2018 

(DeCurtis_01787481-484) 

Exhibit 200 – Internal 

DeCurtis Email (Feb. 7, 

2018) 

201 Internal DeCurtis Email Chain 

dated March 19, 2018 

(DeCurtis_01504563) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 201 – Internal 

DeCurtis Email (March 

19, 2018) 

202 Email Chain from DeCurtis 

dated June 11, 2020 

(DeCurtis_00731141-149) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 202 - Email 

Chain from DeCurtis 

(June 11, 2020) 

203 

(DeCurtis_01473289-304) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 203 – 

204 Patent Owner Preliminary 

Response in IPR2021-00783 

Exhibit 204 - Patent 

Owner Preliminary 

Response 

205 Email Chain between Carnival 

and DeCurtis dated July 23, 

2014 (DeCurtis_00168906-

911) 

 Confidential Exhibit 205 - Email 

Chain between Carnival 

and DeCurtis (July 23, 

2014) 

206 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 206 - 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 9 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

ix 4138-3124-7415.1 

(CARNIVAL00062140-147) 

( 

207 Email Chain between Carnival 

and DeCurtis dated December 

6, 2019 (DeCurtis_00166229-

232) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 207 - Email 

Chain between Carnival 

and DeCurtis (December 

6, 2019) 

208 

(CARNIVAL00765736-774) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 208 – 

209 Email from NCL to DeCurtis 

dated November 1, 2018 

(DeCurtis_00002376) 

 Confidential Exhibit 209 - Email from 

NCL to DeCurtis 

(November 1, 2018) 

210 

(CARNIVAL00124827-834) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 210 – 

211 Email Chain between 

DeCurtis to Virgin dated June 

2, 2016 (DeCurtis_01718016-

017) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 211 - Email 

Chain between DeCurtis 

to Virgin (June 2, 2016) 

212 DeCurtis Confidential 

Information Presentation 

dated November 2018 

(DeCurtis_01946043-096) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 212 – DeCurtis 

Presentation (November 

2018) 

213 DeCurtis Proposal for Virgin 

Cruises (DeCurtis_01716329-

404) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 213 – DeCurtis 

Proposal 

214 Email Chain between Virgin 

and DeCurtis dated May 23, 

2016 (DeCurtis_01717959-

965) 

Exhibit 214 - Email 

Chain between Virgin 

and DeCurtis (May 23, 

2016) 

215 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 215 – 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 10 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

x 4138-3124-7415.1 

(DeCurtis_00002229-36) 

216 

(DeCurtis_00002254-73) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 216 - 

217 

(DeCurtis_00002407-15) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 217 - 

218 Email Chain from Assa Abloy 

dated December 25, 2019 

(DeCurtis_01621133-144) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 218 - Email 

Chain from Assa Abloy 

(December 25, 2019) 

219 Email Chain from Assa Abloy 

dated December 17, 2019 

(DeCurtis_01621305-311) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 219 - Email 

Chain from Assa Abloy 

(December 17, 2019) 

220 Email Chain from Jaycon 

Systems dated November 22, 

2019 (DeCurtis_01621472-

473) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 220 - Email 

Chain from Jaycon 

Systems (November 22, 

2019) 

221 Email Chain from DeCurtis 

dated March 4, 2019 

(DeCurtis_01619186-191) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 221 - Email 

Chain from DeCurtis 

(March 4, 2019) 

222 Email Chain from DeCurtis 

dated December 3, 2019 

(DeCurtis_01675238-240)

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 222 - Email Chain 

from DeCurtis (December 

3, 2019)

223 Email Chain from DeCurtis 

dated December 12, 2019 

(DeCurtis_00724550-555)

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 223 - Email Chain 

from DeCurtis (December 

12, 2019)

224 Internal DeCurtis Email Chain 

dated September 20, 2018 

(DeCurtis_00636581-582)

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 224 - Internal 

DeCurtis Email Chain 

(September 20, 2018)

225 Master Services Agreement 

between Carnival and Level 11 

effective August 22, 2014 

(CARNIVAL00017597-611)

 Confidential Exhibit 225 – Master 

Service Agreement 

(August 22, 2014) 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 11 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

xi 4138-3124-7415.1 

226 Declaration of Andrew 

Schwalb dated March 29, 

2022

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 226 - Declaration 

of Andrew Schwalb 

(March 29, 2022) 

227 Dictionary Definition of Audit Exhibit 227 – Excerpt 

from Dictionary 

228 

(DeCurtis_00002328-2345) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 228 – 

229 

(DeCurtis_01618744-752) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 229 – 

230 Email from DeCurtis dated 

May 15, 2020 

(DeCurtis_020007826-835) 

 Highly 

Confidential 

Exhibit 230 – Email from 

DeCurtis (May 15, 2020) 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 12 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

i 4138-3124-7415.1 

Carnival’s Local Rule 56.1 Response to DeCurtis’s Statement of Material Facts 

Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(a)-(b), Carnival Corporation (“Carnival”) hereby provides its 

Statement of Material Facts in opposition to DeCurtis, LLC and DeCurtis Corporation’s 

(hereinafter “DeCurtis”) Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. § 

112, ECF No. 203 (“MSJ”). In accordance with L.R. 56.1(b)(2), this Statement first responds to 

DeCurtis’s Statement of Material Facts, and then includes “Additional Facts” material to the MSJ. 

1. Undisputed. 

2. Disputed. DeCurtis misstates and omits words from the claim language. ECF No. 88-1, 

claims 1-3, 7-8, 11-15. 

3. Disputed. DeCurtis omits words from the claim language. ECF No. 88-2, claim 15. 

4. Disputed. DeCurtis omits words from the claim language. ECF No. 88-1, claims 1-3. 

5. Disputed. DeCurtis omits words from the claim language. ECF No. 88-2, claims 13, 15, 

and 18. 

6. Undisputed. 

7. Disputed. Substantial evidence confirms that 

 ECF No. 285-7 (De la Iglesia Report) ¶¶ 239, 284; ECF 

No. 285-19 (DeCurtis_01945577) at *742 (noting ; Ex 164 

(DeCurtis_01630715) at *720 ( ). 

8. Disputed. For example, 

 Ex 165 (DeCurtis_00771718); Ex 166 (DeCurtis_01497954); Ex 167 

(DeCurtis_01497877); Ex 168 (DeCurtis_01498261); Ex 169 (DeCurtis_01486571); Ex 170 

(DeCurtis_01486355); Ex 171 (DeCurtis_01497112). Per Centrak, Inc. v. Sonitor Techs., Inc., 

915 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (citations omitted) DeCurtis manufactured because 

. E.g., Ex 175 

(DeCurtis_00727629); Ex (DeCurtis_00727630); Ex 155 (DeCurtis_00727448); Ex 173 

(DeCurtis_00727426); Ex 174(DeCurtis_00726714); Ex 148 (DeCurtis_00725842); Ex 176 

(DeCurtis_00732035); Ex 177 (DeCurtis_00725650); Ex 178 (DeCurtis_00725555); Ex 179 

(DeCurtis_01149361); Ex 180 (DeCurtis_00725305); Ex 181 (DeCurtis_00725136); Ex 182 

(DeCurtis_00724515); Ex 183 (DeCurtis_00724328); Ex 184 (DeCurtis_00723025). 

9. Disputed. First, DeCurtis did not provide evidence of the terms of any engagement 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 13 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

ii 4138-3124-7415.1 

between Virgin and Assa Abloy. Second, its sole support arises from the Schwalb declaration 

which is inadmissible and does not establish any facts beyond genuine disputed, see Carnival’s 

opposition to DeCurtis’s motion for summary judgment (“Brief”) at 8-9. Third, evidence confirms 

that 

 Ex 

185 (DeCurtis_01737705) (DeCurtis was ; Ex 186 

(DeCurtis_01714498) ( ; Ex 187 

(DeCurtis_01789849) ( 

, and that DeCurtis and 

. (See evidence cited in response to SMF 8). 

10. Disputed. DeCurtis’s description omits and 

it omits mention of 

. E.g., Ex 185 (DeCurtis_01737705) (DeCurtis was 

; Ex 187 (DeCurtis_01789849) . 

11. Disputed. DeCurtis ignores that it 

 (See evidence cited in response to SMF 8). 

12. Disputed. First, DeCurtis did not provide evidence of 

 Second, its sole support arises from the inadmissible Schwalb declaration, see Brief at 8-

9. Third, DeCurtis was 

. Ex 185 

(DeCurtis_01737705). Fourth, 

. Ex 165 (DeCurtis_00771718); Ex 166 

(DeCurtis_01497954); Ex 167 (DeCurtis_01497877); Ex 168 (DeCurtis_01498261); Ex 169 

(DeCurtis_01486571); Ex 170 (DeCurtis_01486355); Ex 171 (DeCurtis_01497112). Fifth, 

f Ex 188 (DeCurtis_01882229), 

 Ex 189 (DeCurtis_01794598). 

Disputed to the extent it suggests that (1) 

, and (2) the wearable was a standardized device. 

Ex 190 (DeCurtis_01508675) (email between Virgin and DeCurtis 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 14 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

iii 4138-3124-7415.1 

 and attached spreadsheet). In addition, 

 Ex 191 (DeCurtis_01717949); Ex 192 (DeCurtis_00366919); Ex 243 

(DeCurtis_00366920). 

14. Disputed. DeCurtis provided, for example, c . Ex 145 

(DeCurtis_00704194 at *94; Ex 146 (DeCurtis_01992624) 

 (showing i 

). 

Disputed. First, evidence shows that 

. 

Ex 147 (DeCurtis_00808683); Ex 244 (DeCurtis_00808687). Second, its sole support arises from 

the inadmissible Schwalb declaration, see Brief at 8-9. Third, evidence shows that 

. (See evidence cited in response to SMF 8). 

16. Disputed to the extent it means that it only had NFC. The evidence does not establish that 

point 

. ECF No. 285-7 (de la Iglesia Report ¶¶ 52-54). Second, DeCurtis 

did not provide technical evidence, and instead relied on the inadmissible Schwalb declaration (see

Brief at 8-9) and deposition testimony from an Assa Abloy employee who lacked personal 

knowledge on the issue and was unaware whether 

Ex 142 (Engebretsen Dep. at 150:19-151:4; 279:11-280:22). Finally, the evidence shows that there 

is a radio in the access panel. See response to SMF 17. 

17. Disputed. Evidence shows that the 

. See, e.g., ECF No. 285-7 (de la Iglesia Report ¶¶ 

418-424). Further, Mr. Schwalb’s testimony is inadmissible and does not establish any facts 

beyond genuine disputed see Brief at 8-9. The cited portions of Mr. Engebretsen’s testimony do 

not support DeCurtis’s statement and lack foundation. See ECF No. 284-15 (Engebretsen Dep.) 

at 148:25-150:17 (beyond the scope and lacked foundation), 152:3-162:7 (testimony regarding 

); 168:4-169:17 (same); 279:11-280:6 (lacked 

foundation); 269:9-13 (testimony regarding prior art exhibit); 269:22-270:12 (testimony about 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 15 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

iv 4138-3124-7415.1 

different prior art exhibit). 

18. Disputed. 

 Ex. 153 (DeCurtis_00729853) . Further disputed to the 

extent DeCurtis’s statement suggests 

 Ex. 154 (DeCurtis_01828250) ( 

 at *69. Further disputed to the extent 

DeCurtis’s statement suggests 

 ECF No. 285-4 (Fournier Dep. Vol. 2) (noting the 

 at 599:19-600:5. 

19. Disputed to the extent, the phrase “Allure door panels” was meant to indicate 

See, e.g., ECF No. 285-7 (de la Iglesia Report ¶¶ 52-54; 418-424). Further disputed 

because . Ex 202 

(DeCurtis_00731141). 

20. Disputed to the extent DeCurtis’s statement suggest “Allure 2” is merely 

 The documents in the first string 

cite response to SMF 16 above show See also, e.g.,

Ex. 155 (DeCurtis_00727448) (email among the three entities on . 

21. Disputed. Evidence shows that 

See response to SMF 17. 

22. Disputed to the extent DeCurtis suggests that “ Mr. Schwalb’s 

testimony is ] inadmissible and does not establish any facts beyond genuine disputed. See Brief at 

8-9. The cited portions of Mr. Engebretsen’s testimony do not support DeCurtis’s statement and/or 

lack foundation. See ECF 284-15 at 150:19-151:10 (“ 

”); 279:11-280:6 (lacks foundation). Evidence shows that Virgin’s 

See e.g., ECF No. 285-

7 (de la Iglesia Report ¶¶ 418-424). Moreover, as shown in the documents cited in response to 

SMF 8, 

23. Disputed. As shown in response to SMF 17, evidence shows that 

. DeCurtis’s 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 16 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

v 4138-3124-7415.1 

reliance on Mr. Schwalb’s uncorroborated and untested statement in support of the contrary does 

not establish undisputed fact. See Brief at 8-9. Further, Mr. Schwalb’s statement that 

 is insufficient to prove DeCurtis’s statement. ECF. No. 284-08 (Schwalb Decl.) ¶ 15. 

24. Disputed. The evidence shows that 

. See e.g., ECF No. 285-7 (de la Iglesia Report ¶¶ 52-54); Ex 165 

(DeCurtis_00771718); Ex 166 (DeCurtis_01497954); Ex 167 (DeCurtis_01497877); Ex 168 

(DeCurtis_01498261); Ex 169 (DeCurtis_01486571); Ex 170 (DeCurtis_01486355); Ex 171 

(DeCurtis_01497112). Mr. Schwalb’s statement to the contrary are inadmissible and do not 

establish any facts beyond genuine dispute. See Brief at 8-9. 

25. Disputed to the extent it characterizes Carnival’s communications as a threat. ECF No. 

284-19 (CARNIVAL00374690) 

 at *92. See also ECF No. 285-29 (CARNIVAL00124886_001-

02); ECF No. 285-81 (Padgett Dep. Vol. 2) at 180:17-181:6, 182:7-183:4. 

26. Disputed. DeCurtis omits words from the agreement, particularly to the extent it suggests 

that ” Ex 210 

(CARNIVAL00124827) 

27. Disputed. Disputed. Mr. Padgett was testifying in his personal capacity, and this testimony 

only reflects his understanding at the time of his deposition, not Carnival’s. 

28. Disputed. DeCurtis was present at and oftentimes 

E.g., Ex 175 (DeCurtis_00727629); Ex 245 

(DeCurtis_00727630); Ex 155 (DeCurtis_00727448); Ex 173 (DeCurtis_00727426); Ex 174 

(DeCurtis_00726714); Ex 148 (DeCurtis_00725842); Ex 176 (DeCurtis_00732035); Ex 177 

(DeCurtis_00725650); Ex 178 (DeCurtis_00725555); Ex 179 (DeCurtis_01149361); Ex 180 

(DeCurtis_00725305); Ex 181 (DeCurtis_00725136); Ex 182 (DeCurtis_00724515); Ex 183 

(DeCurtis_00724328); Ex 184 (DeCurtis_00723025); Ex 202 (DeCurtis_00731141). DeCurtis 

also . Ex 203 

(DeCurtis_01473289 at *303) ( 

. 

29. Disputed. 

. E.g., Ex 202 (DeCurtis_00731141); 

see also documents cited in response to SMF 28. 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 17 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

vi 4138-3124-7415.1 

30. Disputed. 

See documents cited in response to SMF 28. DeCurtis’s reliance on Mr. Schwalb’s 

uncorroborated and untested statement in support of the contrary does not establish undisputed 

fact. 

31. Disputed. The statement does not explain what is meant by "more normal conditions" or 

“operational testing.” Regardless, 

See response to SMF 17 and 28. DeCurtis’s reliance 

on Mr. Schwalb’s inadmissible declaration does not establish undisputed fact. See Brief at 8-9. 

32. Disputed. DeCurtis omits words from the claim language. ECF No. 88-3, claim 11. 

33. Disputed. DeCurtis misstates and omits language from Carnival’s IPR argument and 

further omits every other argument, explanation, and citation from the Patent Owner Preliminary 

Response. Patent Owner Preliminary Response in IPR2021-00783 at 28-30. 

34. Disputed. DeCurtis misstates and omits language from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board 

(“PTAB”)’s order denying institution, and oversimplifies the PTAB’s ruling as being denied “on 

that basis.” ECF No. 284-25 (PTAB Decision) at 32-40. Further disputed to the extent this SMF 

suggests uniqueness of the private identifier was the sole basis for the PTAB’s denial; DeCurtis 

sought to invalidate claim 11 of the ’514 Patent on four different grounds, and the PTAB denied 

them all. ECF No. 284-25 (PTAB decision) at 2, 8. 

35. Disputed to the extent it suggests that the quoted statements are the total sum of Mr. de la 

Iglesia’s opinions on the issue. DeCurtis omits nearly all of Mr. de la Iglesia’s explanation and 

analysis on the topic. E.g., Ex 285-82 (de la Iglesia Dep.) at 244:4-246:24. 

36. Disputed to the extent it suggests that the quoted statements are the total sum of Mr. de la 

Iglesia’s opinions on the issue. E.g., ECF No. 285-7 (de la Iglesia Report) at pp. 247-252. 

37. Disputed. DeCurtis’s citation does not support the breadth of its assertion. The cited 

passage states “

” ECF No. 284-11 (DeCurtis_00807543 

 at *46 (emphasis added). 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 18 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

vii 4138-3124-7415.1 

38. Disputed to the extent that DeCurtis implies t 

 Evidence indicates 

See e.g., ECF No. 284-11 (DeCurtis_00807543) (WPO 

Specification) at *48 (“

 (emphasis added). 

39. Disputed to the extent that the cited statement of Mr. de la Iglesia constitutes an analysis 

of the contents. Further disputed that DeCurtis’s assertion suggests additional analysis is necessary 

to determine . See ECF No. 284-12 (de la Iglesia Dep.) at 

244:25-245:10, 246:2-24 ( 

; see also ECF No. 285-7 (de la Iglesia Report) pp. 243-264. 

40. Disputed. DeCurtis’s citation to Dr. Jakobsson’s report does not support this SMF because 

the cited paragraphs do not anywhere mention ECF No. 285-40 (Jakobsson Report) 

at ¶¶ 252-253. 

41. Disputed. Misstates and omits Mr. de la Iglesia’s testimony. ECF No. 285-41 (de la Iglesia 

Rebuttal Report) (“ 

) at ¶ 904. 

[Unnumbered] Undisputed. 

42. Disputed. The sole document cited (which is a Carnival, not DeCurtis, document) is seven 

years old and is contradicted by the fact that DeCurtis 

: Ex 195 (DeCurtis_01987959) ( ; ECF No. 285-7 (de la Iglesia 

Report) ¶¶ 61, 239, 284 ( Ex 203 (DeCurtis_01473289 at *303) 

); Ex 183 (DeCurtis_00724328) ( 

 to make it all work together (Id.). 

43. Disputed. 

44. Undisputed. 

45. Disputed to the extent that this SMF purports to characterize the entire scope of work that 

Carnival engaged DeCurtis to perform. E.g., ECF No. 285-7 (de la Iglesia Report) at ¶ 133. 

46. Disputed to the extent that this is attempting to characterize the entire scope of work that 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 19 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

viii 4138-3124-7415.1 

Carnival engaged Level 11 to perform. E.g., ECF No. 285-7 (de la Iglesia Report) at ¶¶ 143-160. 

47. Disputed. DeCurtis misstates, mischaracterizes, and omits language from the email 

between Frank Cardell and Jim Learish. Ex 205 (DeCurtis_00168906). 

48. Undisputed. 

49. Disputed. DeCurtis’s use of the term “core vendors” lacks support and omits vendors who 

were instrumental in the E.g., Ex 

206 (CARNIVAL00062140) (Statement of work no. 533).

50. Disputed. E.g., 

Ex 207 (DeCurtis_00166229) ( . 

51. Disputed to the extent DeCurtis suggests that 

 ECF No. 285-2 (CARNIVAL00000270). Further 

that work was not a “throw-away” for at least demonstration purposes. 

52. Disputed to the extent DeCurtis implies that 

.” E.g., ECF No. 285-7 (de la 

Iglesia Report) at ¶¶ 143-160. 

53. Disputed. DeCurtis cites nothing for support; in fact, 

. E.g., ECF No. 285-81 (Padgett Dep.) at 37:5-9. 

54. DeCurtis cites nothing for support, and work on Carnival’s source code started before then. 

E.g., ECF No. 285-7 (de la Iglesia Report) at ¶¶ 146-156. 

55. Disputed. The cited testimony concerns David DeCurtis specifically, moreover, the 

statement misstates the testimony. See e.g., ECF No. 285-81 (Padgett Dep. Vol 1 at 165:15-23 

(“David did not have a role in creating the OceanMedallion. David's role in Project Trident was to 

project manage the overall delivery of the Project Trident vision studio which components of it 

included the Medallion itself and looks like but doesn't function like Method's. And so he had a 

broad view of all elements of the ecosystem.”). 

56. Disputed to the extent this SMF suggests that Level 11 wrote “the source code” for 

DeCurtis. Disputed to the extent DeCurtis’s SMF suggests that 

See e.g., ECF No. 285-7 (de la Iglesia Report) at ¶¶ 143-160; Ex 247 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 20 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

ix 4138-3124-7415.1 

(DeCurtis_01735738).

57. Disputed. 

. See e.g., ECF No. 285-7 (de la Iglesia Report) at ¶¶ 203-216. 

58. Disputed. 

. Based 

on 

59. Disputed. DeCurtis does not identify 

. 

60. Undisputed. 

61. Undisputed. 

62. Undisputed. 

63. Undisputed. 

64. Disputed. SMF 64 misstates the DeCurtis March 12, 2020 letter, which did not offer to 

allow Carnival to inspect DeCurtis’s documents but instead offered to make a “reasonable 

production” of documents chosen by DeCurtis. ECF No. 284-41. SMF 64 also misstates that the 

DeCurtis offer “include[ed]” certain categories of documents, when in fact it was limited to those 

documents, and is incomplete in that it omits the conditions DeCurtis placed on its offer. Id.

65. Disputed, because “this offer” refers to SMF 64 which misstates DeCurtis’s offer. It is 

undisputed that Carnival deemed DeCurtis’s March 12, 2020 offer to be not acceptable and insisted 

on an access to audit DeCurtis’s books and records as provided for by the MSA. ECF No. 284-42.

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 21 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

x 4138-3124-7415.1 

I. CARNIVAL’S STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL FACTS 

66. In November 2018, 

. Ex 209 (DeCurtis_00002376) (email titled “ 

”). 

67. After learning of Carnival’s patents, including the ’514 Patent, 

See ECF No. 285-38 

(DeCurtis Dep. Vol. 2) at 495:9-496:9; ECF No. 294-5 (Jakobsson Rebuttal) ¶¶ 47, 78-87 

(discussing the design-around). See 

Ex. 242 (de la Iglesia Supplemental Report). 

68.

(e.g., Ex 195 (DeCurtis_01987959)), (e.g., ECF No. 285-7 (de la Iglesia Report) ¶¶ 

61, 239, 284; Ex 285-19 (DeCurtis_01945577 at *742) ; 

Ex 164 (DeCurtis_01630715 at *720) 

 (e.g., Ex 203 (DeCurtis_01473289 at *303) 

 (e.g., Ex 175 

(DeCurtis_00727629); Ex 245 (DeCurtis_00727630); Ex 172 (DeCurtis_00727448); Ex 173 

(DeCurtis_00727426); Ex 174 (DeCurtis_00726714); Ex 148 (DeCurtis_00725842); Ex 176 

(DeCurtis_00732035); Ex 177 (DeCurtis_00725650); Ex 178 (DeCurtis_00725555); Ex 179 

(DeCurtis_01149361); Ex 180 (DeCurtis_00725305); Ex 181 (DeCurtis_00725136); Ex 182 

(DeCurtis_00724515); Ex 183 (DeCurtis_00724328); Ex 184 (DeCurtis_00723025)), and 

 (see id.). 

69.

 Ex. 195 (DeCurtis_01987959 ( ). 

70. DeCurtis describes its DXP System as an “end-to-end” system. ECF 87 at ¶ 37; Ex. zot 

(“Lynde Report”) ¶¶ 13, 52. 

71. DeCurtis 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 22 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

xi 4138-3124-7415.1 

 Ex 194 (DeCurtis_01946098). 

72. DeCurtis 

 E.g., Ex 175 

(DeCurtis_00727629); Ex 245 (DeCurtis_00727630); Ex 172 (DeCurtis_00727448); Ex 173 

(DeCurtis_00727426); Ex 174 (DeCurtis_00726714); Ex 148 (DeCurtis_00725842); Ex 176 

(DeCurtis_00732035); Ex 177 (DeCurtis_00725650); Ex 178 (DeCurtis_00725555); Ex 179 

(DeCurtis_01149361); Ex 180 (DeCurtis_00725305); Ex 181 (DeCurtis_00725136); Ex 182 

(DeCurtis_00724515); Ex 183 (DeCurtis_00724328); Ex 184 (DeCurtis_00723025). DeCurtis 

also Ex 203 

(DeCurtis_01473289 at *303) 

; see also Ex 182 (DeCurtis_00724515), Ex 176 (DeCurtis_00732035), Ex 184 

(DeCurtis_00723025), Ex 183 (DeCurtis_00724328). 

73. DeCurtis 

Exs 189 (DeCurtis_01794598); Ex 248 (DeCurtis_01794599); Ex 249 (DeCurtis_10794600); Ex 

250 (DeCurtis_01794601); Ex 251 (DeCurtis_01794602). 

74.

See, e.g., ECF No. 285-7 (de la Iglesia Report) at 

166 ¶ 420 . 

75.

See ECF No. 267 at 5-6, 9 (quoting the claims). 

76.

. See Ex. 150 (Oct. 29, 2020 Non-Infringement, 

Unenforceability, and Invalidity Contentions of DeCurtis (“Contentions”), Ex. 184-A at 44, 49; 

Ex. zot (Contentions), Ex. 516-A at 8, 14, 36. 

77.

 ECF No. 291 (DeCurtis’s SMF) ¶¶ 37-38 (citing ECF No. 284-11 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 23 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

xii 4138-3124-7415.1 

(DeCurtis_00807543 ( ); see also ECF No. 284-11 

(DeCurtis_00807543) at *47 ( .

78. Emails dated 

 Ex 158 (DeCurtis_01889600) (attaching 

; Ex 143 (DeCurtis_00807542) (attaching 

).

79. In May 2018, 

 Ex 159 (C3-0052672) 

; see also Ex 160 (First Am. Answers of 

DeCurtis to Carnival’s First Set of Interrogs.) at 30 ( 

 Ex 

193 (DeCurtis_01891918); Ex 152 (DeCurtis_01891932) (attachment 

.

80. In September 2018, 

 Ex 161 (DeCurtis_01496843). 

 Ex. 246 (DeCurtis_01496864) at *67. 

81. In March 2020, 

 Ex. 149 (DeCurtis_01620105). 

82. In October 2020, 

 Ex. 162 (DeCurtis_00829416). 

83.

 Ex. 157 

(DeCurtis LLC’s Notice of Subpoena to Third Party Assa Abloy Global Solutions, Inc.) Attach. A 

to document subpoena at 6-12; Attach. A to deposition subpoena at 4-7. 

84.

Id. at 148:25-149:3 

); id. at 149:10-150:18, 280:7-281:16 l 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 24 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

xiii 4138-3124-7415.1 

; id. at 152:8-153:3, 155:12-21, 160:17-161:8, 164:16-23, 

165:22-25 . 

85.

 E.g., Ex 165 

(DeCurtis_00771718); Ex 156 (DeCurtis_01497954); Ex 167 (DeCurtis_01497877); Ex 168 

(DeCurtis_01498261); Ex 169 (DeCurtis_01486571); Ex 170 (DeCurtis_01486355); Ex 171 

(DeCurtis_01497112). confirms this as well. See e.g., ECF No. 285-7 (de la Iglesia 

Report) ¶¶ 52-54. 

86.

 E.g., Ex 175 

(DeCurtis_00727629); Ex 245 (DeCurtis_00727630); Ex 172 (DeCurtis_00727448); Ex 173 

(DeCurtis_00727426); Ex 174 (DeCurtis_00726714); Ex 148 (DeCurtis_00725842); Ex 176 

(DeCurtis_00732035); Ex 177 (DeCurtis_00725650); Ex 178 (DeCurtis_00725555); Ex 179 

(DeCurtis_01149361); Ex 180 (DeCurtis_00725305); Ex 181 (DeCurtis_00725136); Ex 182 

(DeCurtis_00724515); Ex 183 (DeCurtis_00724328); Ex 184 (DeCurtis_00723025). 

87. On March 30, 2022, 

 Ex. (March 

30, 2022 email from P. Schmidt); ECF No. 245 (Notice of Compliance).

88.

 ECF No. 285-38 (DeCurtis Dep. Vol. 2) at 495:9-

16, 518:5-519:2. 

89.

 Ex DeCurtis_01491115 (cited in ECF 285-7 (de la Iglesia Report) p. 

249 ¶ 57).

90.

 ECF 272 at 5.

91. Ex 285-7 (De la 

Iglesia Report) at ¶ 254. 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 25 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

xiv 4138-3124-7415.1 

92. Carnival attempted to exercise its audit rights under the MSA, ECF No. 285-55. 

(CARNIVAL00015242), which DeCurtis “declined.” ECF No. 285-54 (CARNIVAL00015237). 

DeCurtis never changed its position. ECF No. 155 (Answer) at ¶¶ 98-100. 

93.

. ECF No. 285-54 (CARNIVAL00015237). 

94. Pursuant to DeCurtis’s March 12, 2020 letter offering to produce certain documents to 

Carnival, DeCurtis would not have produced the email chain filed at ECF No. 285-12. ECF No. 

284-41. 

95. Pursuant to DeCurtis’s March 12, 2020 letter offering to produce certain documents to 

Carnival, DeCurtis would not have produced the document filed at ECF No. 284-112. ECF No. 

284-41. 

96. Pursuant to DeCurtis’s March 12, 2020 letter offering to produce certain documents to 

Carnival, DeCurtis would not have produced the document filed at ECF No. 284-65 or ECF No. 

285-115. ECF No. 284-41. 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 26 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

xv 4138-3124-7415.1 

Dated: May 9, 2022 GRAYROBINSON, P.A.

333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 3200 

Miami, FL 33131 

Phone: (305) 416-6880 

Facsimile: (305) 416-6887 

By: /s/ Diana Fassbender

Diana Marie Fassbender 

Florida Bar No. 0017095 

dszego@orrick.com

Steven J. Routh (pro hac vice) 

T. Vann Pearce, Jr. (pro hac vice) 

Eileen M. Cole (pro hac vice) 

Jay Jurata (pro hac vice) 

Emily Luken (pro hac vice) 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

Columbia Center, 1152 15th Street, N.W. 

 Washington, D.C. 20005-1706 

 Tel: (202) 339-8533 

Jorge Espinosa 

Fla. Bar No. 779032 

jorge.espinosa@gray-robinson.com

Robert R. Jimenez 

Fla. Bar. No. 72020 

robert.jimenez@gray-robinson.com

GRAYROBINSON, P.A. 

333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 3200 

Miami, FL 33131 

Phone: (305) 416-6880 

Facsimile: (305) 416-6887 

 Robert L. Uriarte (pro hac vice) 

 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

 1000 Marsh Road 

 Menlo Park, CA 94025 

 Tel: (650) 289-7105 

Olivia Clements (pro hac vice) 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

51 West 52nd Street 

New York, NY 10019-6142 

Tel: (212) 506-5000 

Johannes Hsu (pro hac vice) 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

2050 Main Street 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 27 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

xvi 4138-3124-7415.1 

Suite 1100 

Irvine, CA 92614-8255 

Tel: (949) 567-6700 

David R. Medina (pro hac vice) 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

777 South Figueroa Street 

Suite 3200 

Los Angeles. CA 90017-5855 

Tel: (213) 629-2020 

Sheryl Garko (pro hac vice) 

Laura Najemy (pro hac vice) 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

222 Berkeley Street 

Suite 2000 

Boston, MA 02116 

(617) 880-1800 

Attorney for Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant 

Carnival Corporation 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on May 9, 2022, I filed the foregoing Carnival Corporation’s Response 

to DeCurtis’s Statement of Material Facts in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment via 

CM/ECF which will serve all attorneys of record. 

CARNIVAL CORPORATION

By: /s/

[ATTORNEY]

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 28 of 29
CONTAINS INFORMATION MARKED “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” UNDER THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

xvii 4138-3124-7415.1 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 29 of 29