alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | such Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in such Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Magna-Lab, Inc. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|          |   |                                           |   |
|---------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
| July 14, 2011 |   | /s/ Lawrence A. Minkoff                        |   |
|          |   | Name: Lawrence A. Minkoff                      |   |
|          |   | Title: President (principal executive officer) |   |
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-14 February 10, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE WITH DETROIT EDISON COMPANY

ON APPARENT VIOLATIONS OF NRC REQUIREMENTS AT FERMI PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet February 18 with

representatives of Detroit Edison Company for a predecisional enforcement

conference on apparent violations at the Fermi Nuclear Power Station. The

facility is in Monroe, Michigan.

The meeting will be at 10:30 a.m. in the Third Floor Conference Room of

the NRC Region III Office, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois. The meeting

is open to public observation.

The apparent violations occurred in October and November while the plant

was shut down for refueling and replacement of its main turbine. In one

instance, operators failed to take timely action to interconnect the plant's

safety cooling water reservoirs. The connection was restored in 28 hours,

which exceeded the eight-hour requirement. In the second occasion, the plant's

safety review committee approved a clarification to a license requirement.

The clarification resulted in plant operators violating license requirements.

The third apparent violation involved the failure by operators to conduct a

routine test of control rod instrumentation prior to changing the operational

condition of the reactor.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean the NRC has

determined that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be

taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes

and safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out

any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable

the company to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decisions on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement

action, such as a fine, will be made at this conference. Those decisions will

be made by senior NRC officials at a later date.

####
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 00-011

January 13, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, FEBRUARY 3-5

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

(ACRS) will hold a meeting on February 3-5 in Rockville, Maryland.

On Thursday, February 3, the committee will review: technical aspects of the revised

oversight process, including the technical adequacy of current and proposed performance

indicators; the proposed final amendment to 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73; the proposed Regulatory

Guide and associated Nuclear Energy Institute Document 96-07, “Guidelines for 10 CFR 50.59

Safety Evaluations;” the proposed revision of the Commission’s Safety Goal Policy Statement

for reactors; and the proposed response to follow-up questions resulting from the ACRS meeting

with the Commission on November 4, 1999.

On Friday, February 4, the committee will review: impediments to increased use of riskinformed regulation and risk-informing 10 CFR Part 50; the proposed final revision of

Appendix K to 10 CFR Part 50; and the report on the NRC Safety Research Program.

On the final day of the meeting, the committee will continue its discussion of proposed

ACRS reports.

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North

Building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, beginning at 8:30 each day.

Those who seek additional information or schedule updates about this meeting should

contact Sam Duraiswamy, at 301-415-7364.

Other aspects of the meeting will be described in an upcoming edition of the Federal

Register. ACRS meeting notices, transcripts and letter reports are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

###
CITY OF PH ILADELPHIA Department of Public Health

Environmental Protection Division Air Management Services



### InterOffice Memo

To: File

From: Biji Pandisseril an d Maryjoy Ulatowski

Date: December 6, 2014.

Subject: RACT Analysis for Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals L.P - Belmont Terminal (PLID # 01507)

Introduction:

The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that moderate (or worse) ozone nonattainment areas implement reasonably available control technology (RACT) controls on all major sources of VOC and NOx. Philadelphia County is part of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City moderate ozone nonattainment area for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This document presents the findings of a RACT evaluation for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for this facility.

Company Description:

The Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals L.P - Belmont Terminal (Sunoco - Belmont Terminal) is located at 2700 Passyunk Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19145. The f acility’s air emission sources include a Gasoline Truck Loading with Vapor Control Units products loading racks, Distillate Truck Loading, a Emergency Generator, and nine (9) Storage Tanks (with vapor pressure > 1.5 psia).

Applicability for NOx and VOC RACT:

Sunoco - Belmont Terminal is not a major source of Nitr ogen Oxides (NOx). The potential NOx emission as limited by the issued AMS permits is less than 100 tons per year, the major source threshold in Philadelphia County that is not applicable to NOx RACT.

Sunoco - Belmont Terminal is a major source of Vola tile Organic Compound (VOC) emissions having potential VOC emissions of greater than 50 tons per year , the major source threshold in Philadelphia County that is applicable to VOC RACT 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.

Process Descriptions:

The emissions units at Sunoco Belmont Terminal include the following: Gasoline Truck Loading with Vapor Control Units products loading racks, Distillate Truck Loading, an Emergency Generator, and nine (9) Storage Tanks (with vapor pressure > 1.5 psia.

RACT Analysis: In accordance, with 25 PA Code 129.91 (a all e sources at the facility will comply w ith RACT requirements as

follows: The Gasoline Truck Loading Rack with Vapor Rec overy Unit and Distillate Truck Loading will comply with the requirements of 25 PA Code 129.5 9, 129.62 and AMR V Section V (CTG: Control of Hydrocarbons form Tank Trucks Gasoline Loading Terminals) EPA 450/2-77-026) The Storage Tanks will comply with the presumptive RACT requirement of 25 PA Code 129.57 (CTG: Control of VOCs form Storage of Petroleum Liquids in fixed roof tanks EPA 450/2-77-036 and Control of VOCs form Storage of Petroleum Liquids in external floating tanks EPA 450/2-78-047)For Light Liquid/Vapor Components Fugitives the fac ility is applicable to the process equipment leak requirements of the CTG RACT regul ation AMR V, Section XIII.

Presumptive RACT: The emergency generator will comply with the presum ptive RACT 25 PA Code 129.93(c)(5) by operating less than 500 hours in consecutive 12-month period and will maintain & operate in accordance with manufacturer's specifications.

1 / 9 / 1 5

Edward Wiener, Chief of Source Registration Date
§ 127.501 How will SBA determine the industries that are eligible for EDWOSB or WOSB requirements? ( a ) Based upon its analysis, SBA will designate by NAICS Industry Subsector Code those industries in which WOSBs are underrepresented and substantially underrepresented.
( b ) In determining the extent of underrepresentation of WOSBs, SBA may request that the head of any Federal department or agency provide SBA, data or information necessary to analyze the extent of underrepresentation of WOSBs.
[75 FR 62282, Oct. 7, 2010, as amended at 80 FR 55022, Sept. 14, 2015]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-15 February 25, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICIALS

TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of the University of Massachusetts on Thursday,

February 27, to discuss apparent violations of NRC requirements.

The predecisional enforcement conference, which begins at 1 p.m.,

will be held in the Region I Office, 475 Allendale Road, in King

of Prussia, Pa. It is open to the public for observation.

A routine NRC inspection conducted on February 4-6 at the

University of Massachusetts' Medical Center, 55 Lave Avenue North

and 373 Plantation Street, in Worcester, Mass., found five

laboratories where radioactive materials were unsecured and

unattended. NRC regulations require that licensed materials be

secured against unauthorized removal or access. After the

inspection, the NRC staff issued a confirmatory action letter

documenting the university's commitments to enhance its program

for radioactive material security and control.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference

does not mean that the NRC has determined that a violation has

occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the

purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to

point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its

proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later time.

#
No: 24-022 March 29, 2024 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Issues Final Environmental Impact Statement 

for Turkey Point Subsequent License Renewal

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a final site-specific Environmental 

Impact Statement – known as an EIS – for the subsequent renewal of the licenses for Turkey 

Point Units 3 and 4 in Florida. 

The final EIS is based, in part, on a revised environmental report received from Florida 

Power and Light. The final site-specific EIS evaluates all the environmental impacts of continued 

operation of Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4 during the subsequent license renewal term. 

The NRC’s Atomic Safety Licensing Board is conducting a proceeding regarding the 

environmental review. Following that proceeding, the agency will make a final decision on 

extending the Turkey Point licenses into the subsequent license renewal term. Information about 

the Turkey Point subsequent license renewal review is available on the NRC website.
#### § 123.302 What is the interest rate on an economic injury disaster loan?

Your economic injury loan will have an interest rate of 4 percent per annum or less.
No: II‐23-023 August 9, 2023 

Contact: Dave Gasperson, 404-997-4417 

NRC to Hold Fuel Cycle Facility Construction Oversight Workshop

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will host a hybrid Construction Oversight Workshop 

for commercial fuel cycle facilities at its Atlanta office on Aug. 15. 

The one-day workshop is open to the public and will run from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern time

at Marquis One Tower, Suite 800, 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, and online via Microsoft Teams.

The workshop’s goal is to encourage an open dialogue about the NRC's construction 

oversight program for commercial fuel cycle facilities. It’s also intended to gather feedback from 

stakeholders, including the public, licensees, applicants, and industry organizations. 

The NRC staff will present updates and proposed revisions to the construction oversight 

program and share lessons learned from recent construction projects, along with assessments made 

during construction and operational readiness reviews. The agenda will include time for questions 

related to the regulatory issues discussed during the workshop. 

The agenda and presentation materials can be found in the online public meeting notice. 

Attendees planning to join in person should register in advance. 

For more information, contact Michael Greenleaf at michael.greenleaf@nrc.gov or call 

404-997-4495.
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.1203 Standing.

Only the borrower on a loan, or its legal successor in interest, for which SBA has issued a final SBA loan review decision that makes a finding in § 134.1201(b)(1) through (4) has standing to appeal the final SBA loan review decision to OHA. Lenders and individual owners of a borrower entity do not have standing to appeal a final SBA loan review decision.
EXHIBIT
32CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRESIDENT ANDCHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




















Exhibit
32








Certification
pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








Thomas R.
Butkus, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Lyn G. Rupich,
President and Pamela N. Favero, Chief Financial Officer of AJS Bancorp, Inc.
(the “Company”) each certify in their capacity as officers of the Company that
they have reviewed the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008 and that to the best of their
knowledge:





1.
            the
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            the
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





The
purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.








March
      16, 2009
                      /s/ Thomas R. ButkusDate
                      Chairman
      of the Board and ChiefExecutive
      OfficerMarch
      16, 2009
                      /s/ Lyn G. RupichDate
                      President
      and Chief Operating OfficerMarch
      16, 2009
                      /s/ Pamela N. FaveroDate
                      Chief
      Financial
Officer
EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF AUDITORS TO INCORPORATE
                       FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INTO FORM S-8


<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-105598  on Form S-8 of the AJS Bancorp,  Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan and the
AJS Bancorp,  Inc. 2003 Recognition and Retention Plan of our report dated March
14, 2005 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AJS Bancorp, Inc.

                                            /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

                                                Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Oak Brook, Illinois
March 28, 2005
EXHIBIT 109 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-110 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 1 of

6
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-110 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 2 of

6
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-110 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 3 of

6
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-110 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 4 of

6
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-110 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 5 of

6
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-110 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 6 of

6
Press Office 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

Fact Sheet 

October 22, 2003 

H-1B Petitions Received and Approved in FY 2003 

• CIS received 231,030 H-1B petitions in FY 2003 for both initial and continuing employment. 

• Legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) approved 217,340 petitions in FY 2003. 

Of the approved applications, 105,314 were for initial employment and 112,026 petitions were for 

continuing employment. 

• Nearly all workers approved for continuing employment are not subject to the cap mandated 

by Congress at 195,000 beneficiaries. 

o Also exempt from the cap are individuals working for institutions of higher

education, and nonprofit research organizations

o Of the workers approved for initial employment in FY 2003, about 19 percent did 

not count against the cap because the sponsor was an exempt employer. 

• The total number of workers subject to the FY 2003 cap comprised about two-fifths of the 

total number approved for H-1B employment. 

• During FY 2003, the Congressionally-mandated cap of 195,000 beneficiaries was not reached and 

about 78,000 individuals, mostly initial beneficiaries, were counted against the cap. The 

corresponding number for FY 2002 was 79,000. 

• Although workers may have multiple petitions submitted on their behalf during 

the pursuit of H-1B employment, they are counted only once against the cap if working for 

non-exempt employers. 

www.dhs.gov 
H-1B Petitions Filed and Approved by Type of Petition: FYs 2000-03 

Fiscal Year Total Initial Employment Continuing 

Employment 

Petitions Filed 

Petitions Approved 

2000 299,046 

2001 342,035 

2002 215,190 

2003 231,030 

2000 257,640 

2001 331,206 

2002 197,537 

2003 217,340 

164,814 134,232 

201,543 140,492 

109,576 105,614 

108,526 122,504 

136,787 120,853 

201,079 130,127 

103,584 93,953 

105,314 112,026 

-USCISOn March 1, 2003, U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) became one of three legacy INS 

components to join the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. U.S. CIS is charged with fundamentally 

transforming and improving the delivery of immigration and citizenship services, while enhancing the 

integrity of our nation's security.
#### Kate Setera, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of First Bank & Trust Company of Utica, as Trustee under the Will of Frederick S. Easton, Deceased.

*910Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-96-74 November 12, 1996

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of

Public Service Electric & Gas (PSE&G) on Monday afternoon, November 18, to

review PSE&G's progress and the efforts to verify the utility can perform a

safe restart of the Salem Generating Station in Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey.

This meeting was requested by the NRC to discuss the status of these restart

activities.

The meeting, which begins at 1:00, will be held in the Processing Center

at the Salem site. It is open to the public for observation only.
DISMISS; Opinion Filed December 31, 2013. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 01075

- CV

JEFFREY FRANKLIN , Appellant V. DEMARLA MASON , Appellee

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 01

- 08617

- S



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Fillmore Opinion by Justice Lang
The filin g fee in this case is past due. By postcard dated August 6 , 2013 , we notified
appellant the $175 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten

days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the
appeal without further notice. Also by postc ard dated August 6, 2013, we notified appellant that
the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file the
docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might result in

dismissal of his appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing
statement, or otherwise communicated with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.– 2

– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b)(c).

131075F.P05 /Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JEFFREY FRANKLIN, Appellant

No. 05

- 13

- 01075

- CV V.
DEMARLA MASON, Appellee On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 01

- 08617

- S. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Justices FitzGerald and Fillmore participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee DEMARLA MASON recover her costs of this appeal from appellant JEFFREY FRANKLIN.

Judgment entered this 31st day of December, 2013.

/Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE