alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3193a. Transfer of administration of Job Corps program to Employment and Training Administration

The Secretary of Labor shall submit to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate a plan for the transfer of the administration of the Job Corps program authorized under title I–C of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 1 from the Office of the Secretary to the Employment and Training Administration. As of the date that is 30 days after the date of submission of such plan, the Secretary may transfer the administration and appropriated funds of the program from the Office of the Secretary and the provisions of section 2883a of this title shall no longer be applicable.

(Pub. L. 111–117, div. D, title I, §108, Dec. 16, 2009, 123 Stat. 3238.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Workforce Investment Act of 1998, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 105–220, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 936, and was repealed by Pub. L. 113–128, title V, §§506, 511(a), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1703, 1705, effective July 1, 2015. Title I–C of the Act probably means subtitle C of title I of Pub. L. 105–220, which was classified generally to subchapter III (former §2881 et seq.) of former chapter 30 of this title. Pursuant to section 3361(a) of this title, references to a provision of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 are deemed to refer to the corresponding provision of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, Pub. L. 113–128, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1425, effective July 1, 2015. For complete classification of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to the Code, see Tables. For complete classification of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of this title and Tables.

Section 2883a of this title, referred to in text, was omitted from the Code pursuant to this section.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of Labor Appropriations Act, 2010, and also as part of the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010, and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010, and not as part of title I of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act which comprises this subchapter.

Section was formerly classified to section 2883b of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 303.7 Requirements for Comprehensive Economic Development Strategies. ( a ) *General.* CEDS are designed to bring together the public and private sectors in the creation of an economic roadmap to diversify and strengthen Regional economies. The CEDS should analyze the Regional economy and serve as a guide for establishing Regional goals and objectives, developing and implementing a Regional plan of action, and identifying investment priorities and funding sources. Public and private sector partnerships are critical to the implementation of the integral elements of a CEDS set forth in paragraph (b) of this section. As a performance-based plan, the CEDS will serve a critical role in a Region's efforts to defend against economic dislocations due to global trade, competition and other events resulting in the loss of jobs and private investment.
( b ) *Strategy requirements.* ( 1 ) A CEDS must be the result of a continuing economic development planning process, developed with broad-based and diverse public and private sector participation. Consistent with section 302 of PWEDA, each CEDS must promote Regional resiliency and be unique and responsive to the relevant Region. Each CEDS must include: ( i ) A summary of economic development conditions of the Region;
( ii ) An in-depth analysis of economic and community development strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (commonly known as a “*SWOT”* analysis);
( iii ) Strategies and an implementation plan to build upon the Region's strengths and opportunities and resolve the weaknesses and threats facing the Region, which should not be inconsistent with applicable State and local economic development or workforce development strategies; and
( iv ) Performance measures used to evaluate the Planning Organization's successful development and implementation of the CEDS.
( 2 ) EDA will publish and periodically update specific CEDS content guidelines.
( c ) *Consideration of non-EDA funded CEDS.* ( 1 ) In determining the acceptability of a CEDS prepared independently of EDA Investment Assistance or oversight for Projects under parts 305 and 307 of this chapter, EDA may in its discretion determine that the CEDS is acceptable so long as it includes all of the elements listed in paragraph (b) of this section. In certain circumstances, EDA may accept a non-EDA funded CEDS that does not contain all the elements listed in paragraph (b) of this section. In doing so, EDA shall consider the circumstances surrounding the application for Investment Assistance, including emergencies or natural disasters and the fulfillment of the requirements of section 302 of PWEDA.
( 2 ) If the CEDS for a Project under parts 305 and 307 of this chapter is developed under another federally-supported program, it must include acceptable performance measures similar to those set forth in paragraph (b) of this section and information on the state of the Regional economy. To the maximum extent practicable, the CEDS shall be consistent and coordinated with any existing economic development plan for the Region.
[71 FR 56675, Sept. 27, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 76130, Dec. 19, 2014; 82 FR 57054, Dec. 1, 2017]
§ 206.200 General. ( a ) *Purpose.* This subpart establishes procedures for the administration of Public Assistance grants approved under the provisions of the Stafford Act.
( b ) *What policies apply to FEMA public assistance grants?* ( 1 ) The Stafford Act requires that we deliver eligible assistance as quickly and efficiently as possible consistent with Federal laws and regulations. We expect the recipient and the subrecipient to adhere to Stafford Act requirements and to these regulations when administering our public assistance grants.
( 2 ) The regulations entitled “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards,” published at 2 CFR parts 200 and 3002, place requirements on the State in its role as recipient and gives the recipient discretion to administer federal programs under their own procedures. We expect the recipient to: ( i ) Inform subrecipients about the status of their applications, including notifications of our approvals of Project Worksheets and our estimates of when we will make payments;
( ii ) Pay the full amounts due to subrecipients as soon as practicable after we approve payment, including the State contribution required in the FEMA-State Agreement; and
( iii ) Pay the State contribution consistent with State laws.
[55 FR 2304, Jan. 23, 1990, as amended at 63 FR 64425, Nov. 20, 1998; 64 FR 55160, Oct. 12, 1999; 79 FR 76086, Dec. 19, 2014; 82 FR 42, Jan. 3, 2017]
§ 208.64 Administrative and audit requirements. ( a ) *Non-Federal audit.* For Sponsoring Agencies and States, requirements for non-Federal audit are contained in 44 CFR 13.26, in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations.
( b ) *Federal audit.* DHS or the Government Accountability Office may elect to conduct a Federal audit of any payment made to a Sponsoring Agency or State.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Thomas FOYE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6378.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Anthony Thomas Foye, Appellant Pro Se.

Michael Lee Keller, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, WV, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Thomas Foye seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Foye,*Nos. CR-99-23; CA-01-44-2 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 13, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
### §255. Three-judge trials

(a) Upon application of any party to a civil action, or upon his own initiative, the chief judge of the Court of International Trade shall designate any three judges of the court to hear and determine any civil action which the chief judge finds: (1) raises an issue of the constitutionality of an Act of Congress, a proclamation of the President or an Executive order; or (2) has broad or significant implications in the administration or interpretation of the customs laws.

(b) A majority of the three judges designated may hear and determine the civil action and all questions pending therein.

(Added Pub. L. 91–271, title I, §108, June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 277; amended Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §501(5), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1742.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 255 was renumbered section 257 of this title.

#### Amendments

1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–417 redesignated the Customs Court as the Court of International Trade.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980, and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1970, see section 122 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under section 256 of this title.
### §963. Courts defined

As used in this chapter, unless the context indicates otherwise, the words "court" and "courts" include the Supreme Court of the United States and the courts enumerated in section 610 of this title.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 927.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

This section was included to embrace the Supreme Court and all courts under the supervision of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. See section 610 of this title and reviser's note thereunder.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 28, 2013

d1021 

# Order

Clerk October 28, 2013

147319

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147319

COA: 315500

Wayne CC: 12

- 006087

- FC

ANDREW RICARDO KNOTT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2013 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED , because we are not persuaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### George B. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. SHARPLES COMPANY, Defendant, v. KEYSTONE BOILER WORKS, INC. and Walter Thackray, Third-Party Defendants.

No. 36782.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

March 25, 1968.

Milton M. Borowsky, Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Thomas R. White, Jr., White & Williams, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

Howard R. Detweiler, Detweiler, Sherr, Huhn & Hughes, Philadelphia, Pa., for third-party defendant, Keystone Boiler Works, Inc.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

This *matter comes*before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed by Keystone Boiler Works, Inc., third-party defendant, seeking such judgment against the plaintiff, George B. Smith.

Summary judgment, under Rule 56 of the F.R.Civ.P., may only be entered where there exists no genuine issue as to a material fact or facts. It is the accepted rule in this Circuit that upon a motion for a summary judgment it is no part of the Court’s function to decide issues of fact, but solely to determine whether there is an issue of fact to be tried. All doubts as to the existence of a genuine issue as to a material fact must be resolved against the party moving for a summary judgment. *118Associated Hardware Supply Co. v. Big Wheel Distributing Company, 355 F.2d 114, 17 A.L.R.3d 998 (3rd Cir. 1966); see also Sarnoff et al. v. Ciaglia, 165 F.2d 167 (3rd Cir. 1947).

Review of the record indicates that various requests for admissions have been submitted by Keystone to the plaintiff and defendant. Certain requests concerning material facts have been admitted by the plaintiff and denied by the defendant. Others have been denied by both. Thus, genuine issues of material fact do appear to exist. Under such circumstances, we would not be warranted in entering summary judgment. Therefore, motion of third-party defendant, Keystone Boiler Works, Inc., for summary judgment will be denied.
**EXHIBIT 4.2**
**SUMMARY OF EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS**
**BETWEEN BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT**
**AND DR. UDO OELS**
    Term: Dr. Oels joined the Board of Management in 1996 and his current termwill expire on January 31, 2006.
Compensation: The aggregate remuneration of Dr. Oels for 2003 is comprised ofthe following elements:
Base salary: EUR 413,560. Dr. Oels also received remuneration in kind totalingEUR 25,006 and consisting mainly of amounts such as the value assigned to theuse of a company car for taxation purposes.
Fixed supplement: EUR 63,870
Variable bonus: EUR 436,590(determined by attainment of the group gross cash flowtarget)
Stock option rights: Dr. Oels received a total of 6,450 option rights on thebasis of his own investments. The options from this tranche had an intrinsicvalue of EUR 37,797 at the closing date (if they could have been exercised).
Retirement: The Company will pay Dr. Oels a monthly pension equal to 80 percentof the last monthly base salary and fixed supplement received while in service.These amounts are in addition to any amounts received as a result of hisparticipation in Bayer’s Employee Pension Plan (See Item 6). He will beentitled to receive the pension upon completion of 30 years of services withthe Bayer group or 8 years of membership in the Executive Board of the Company.
### SUBCHAPTER III—OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL WORKPLACE RIGHTS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 115–397, title III, §308(b)(11), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5326, substituted "OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL WORKPLACE RIGHTS" for "OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE" in subchapter heading.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3983 — Polestar/Prisa/Ibersuizas/Iberian Capital/Dedalo)

(2005/C 310/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 30 November 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                     4,616
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,937
<PP&E>                                           6,175
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,742)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,651
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,472
<COMMON>                                       109,022
<OTHER-SE>                                   (120,886)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,445
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,377
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  85
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,940)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,940)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,940)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.13)


</TABLE>
§ 108.2000 Operational Assistance Grants to NMVC Companies and SSBICs. ( a ) *NMVC Companies.* Regulations governing Operational Assistance grants to NMVC Companies may be found in subparts D and E of this part 108, and in §§ 108.2010 through 108.2040.
( b ) *SSBICs.* Regulations governing Operational Assistance grants to SSBICs may be found in §§ 108.2001 through 108.2040.
[67 FR 68503, Nov. 12, 2002]
- Skip to Primary Navigation
    - Skip to Main Content
    - Skip to Footer

        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   

      -  Water & Power          - Dams
        - Powerplants
        - Projects
        - Agrimet/Hydromet
        - Water Operations 
      -  Resources & Research          - Programs
        - Technical Service Center
        - Research & Development
        - Reclamation Manual
        - Reclamation Information Sharing Environment (RISE)
        - Environmental Resources/Reports
        - Library 
      -  About Us          - Mission
        - Fact Sheet
        - Commissioner
        - Addresses/Contacts
        - Organizational Chart
        - Leadership Bios
        - Employment
        - Contact 
      -  Recreation & Public Use          - Find Recreation
        - Recreation.gov
        - Public Use 
      -  News & Multimedia          - News Releases
        - News Stories
        - Speeches
        - Congressional Testimony
        - Fact Sheets
        - Photos
        - Multimedia
        - Social Media 

# California-Great Basin

Welcome to the Bureau of Reclamation California-Great Basin

            - Reclamation
            - California-Great Basin
            - CVP
            - Ratesetting
            - CVP Annual Ratebooks & Schedules
            - CVP Ratebooks - Irrigation, 2004

Region 10              - Region 10 Home
              - About Us
              - Area Offices
              - Central Valley Project (CVP)                  - About the CVP
                - Water Info Links
                - Ratesetting
                - Projects/Activities
                - Consultation on the Coordinated Long-Term Operation          of the CVP and SWP
                - Laws/Regs/Links
                - Financial Information 
                - Long-Term Water Transfer Program
                - Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) 
              - Programs & Activities
              - Projects & Facilities
              - Doing Business with Reclamation
              - Public Affairs 
              - Employment
              - Recreation
              - Site Index
              - Contact Us

## CVP Ratebooks - Irrigation, 2004

*Note:  Documents in Portable Document Format (PDF) require Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher to view, download Adobe Acrobat Reader*
*Last Updated: 8/6/21*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

            - Contact Us
            - Site Index
            - Accessibility
            - Disclaimer
            - DOI
            - FOIA
            - No Fear Act
            - Notices
            - Privacy Policy
            - Quality of Information
            - Recreation.gov
            - USA.gov
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.1101 Scope of rules. ( a ) The rules of practice in this subpart apply to appeals of denial of certification and decertification for inclusion in the SBA Veteran Small Business Certification Program certification database (VOSB or SDVOSB Appeals).
( b ) Except where inconsistent with this subpart, the provisions of subparts A and B of this part apply to appeals listed in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Protests of a concern's eligibility for inclusion in the SBA Veteran Small Business Certification Program Database (VOSB or SDVOSB Status Protests) are governed by subpart J of this part.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-70 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/14/2002 Page 1 of 1
State San Luis Obispo
Lion Rock aie faew Ceuny
Unit
ie
a
ln
| le
| 2
lass [Ss
iQ
-
s
hoz is .
ica PointSal /@ Santa Maria
Unit %
4o8 = |
tl i Point Sal
a4
Sarita | Purisima
Maria | Point
Unit ea Unit
i
|
| |
a4
— +8 126 laa Vandenberg
a | are Air Force Base
lgs0_ faa es State
| A Names PXP/Lompoc
a33_| |
|
ee ||
Point
Pedernales
Unit
1437. 438 Lompoc
Tranquillon .
IRENE Ridge Unit
499 by —
Santa Barbara
Bonito Point
Unit Arguello County
a 48
i
i | Rocky Point
Unit
)
HIDALG |
4a las last 452 lass re
: oint
7
Point A) HARVEST qp/HERMosA Conception
Arguello || sis 216 =
Unit
Sword
Unit
### §3153. Eligible providers of youth workforce investment activities

#### (a) In general

From the funds allocated under section 3163(b) of this title to a local area, the local board for such area shall award grants or contracts on a competitive basis to providers of youth workforce investment activities identified based on the criteria in the State plan (including such quality criteria as the Governor shall establish for a training program that leads to a recognized postsecondary credential), and taking into consideration the ability of the providers to meet performance accountability measures based on primary indicators of performance for the youth program as described in section 3141(b)(2)(A)(ii) of this title, as described in section 3112(b)(2)(D)(i)(V) of this title, and shall conduct oversight with respect to such providers.

#### (b) Exceptions

A local board may award grants or contracts on a sole-source basis if such board determines there is an insufficient number of eligible providers of youth workforce investment activities in the local area involved (such as a rural area) for grants and contracts to be awarded on a competitive basis under subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 113–128, title I, §123, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1498.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.