alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 
 CONTROL CERTIFICATION
 
 I, James A. Coyne, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PLM Equipment Growth & Income Fund VII.
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is prepared;
 
 b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and
 
 c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and board of Managers:
 
 a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 
 6.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 
 
 
 Date: May 14, 2004  By:  /s/ James A. Coyne
 James A. Coyne
 President
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 3339

Not in labor force

Number in thousands

35 to 39 years

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU05024934Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Not in Labor Force, 35-39 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:08:59 PM)
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-53 June 4, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC PROPOSES $4,400 FINE AGAINST NEW JERSEY MEDICAL FACILITY

FOR FIRING EMPLOYEE WHO RAISED SAFETY CONCERN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $4,400 fine against a New

Jersey medical facility for discriminating against an employee who raised a safety concern.

Specifically, the NRC has found the Coriell Institute for Medical Research, in Camden, N.J.,

dismissed the worker in November 1996 after he complained about unnecessary radioactive

exposure received while working in a laboratory on Sept. 13, 1996.

A U.S. Department of Labor Administrative Law Judge ruled in December 1997 that

discrimination had occurred. On Feb. 26, 1999, a Department of Labor Administrative Review

Board agreed with that finding.

Subsequently, the NRC staff held a predecisional enforcement conference on May 3,

1999, to give Coriell an opportunity to present facts about the case. All of the information

gathered by the agency led to the NRC decision to fine the medical facility.

“In this case, the discriminatory actions were initiated by the employee’s supervisor, and

taken by the Vice President. Therefore, this violation has been categorized at Severity Level II,”

NRC Region I Administrator Hubert J. Miller wrote in a June 2 letter to Coriell notifying it of the

decision. The NRC issues four level of violations, with Level I being the worst and Level IV

being the least severe.

Coriell has 30 days to pay the fine or to request in writing that all or part of the penalty

be withdrawn.

#
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-14202-Civ-Middlebrooks/Maynard

DAVID POSCHMANN, 

Plaintiff,

v.

ZERBY HOTEL, LLC, 

Defendant.

____________________________________________/

ORDER CLOSING CASE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with 

Prejudice, filed on August 7, 2020. (DE 11). The Court congratulates the Parties on their amicable 

resolution of this matter and notes that pursuant to Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 

1272 (11th Cir. 2012), the Parties’ Stipulation is self-executing and no Order of the Court is 

required to dismiss this action. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 

1. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

2. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this CASE.

3. The Clerk shall also DENY all pending motions AS MOOT. 

SIGNED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida, this 11th day of August, 2020.

Donald M. Middlebrooks

United States District Judge

Case 2:20-cv-14202-DMM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2020 Page 1 of 1
### §108. Noncompliance with obligations involved in labor disputes or failure to settle by negotiation or arbitration as preventing injunctive relief

No restraining order or injunctive relief shall be granted to any complainant who has failed to comply with any obligation imposed by law which is involved in the labor dispute in question, or who has failed to make every reasonable effort to settle such dispute either by negotiation or with the aid of any available governmental machinery of mediation or voluntary arbitration.

(Mar. 23, 1932, ch. 90, §8, 47 Stat. 72.)
### §2506. Liaison role of Department of Labor

The Department of Labor shall serve as a liaison among employers, labor unions, and community-based organizations. The liaison role may include—

(1) coordination of employers, labor unions, and community-based organizations with respect to technical assistance provided under section 2503(a) of this title;

(2) conducting regular assessment meetings with representatives of employers, labor unions, and community-based organizations with respect to such technical assistance; and

(3) seeking the input of employers and labor unions with respect to strategies and recommendations for improving such technical assistance.

(Pub. L. 102–530, §7, Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3467.)
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Valley Forge
National Historical Park
Pennsylvania


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  The People of the Encampment
 On December 19, 1777, when Washington's army marched into camp at Valley Forge, tired, cold, and ill-equipped, it was lacking in much of the training essential for consistent success on the battlefield. On June 19, 1778, after a six-month encampment, this same army emerged to pursue and successfully engage Lt. Gen. Sir Henry Clinton's British army at the Battle of Monmouth in New Jersey. The ordered ranks, martial appearance, revived spirit, and fighting skill of the American soldiers spoke of a great transformation having occurred amidst the cold, sickness, and hardship that was Valley Forge.

General George Washington contemplates outdoors.General George Washington
The legendary General of the Continental Army!
Group of 18th century men standing in a field during an overcast day.Washington's Generals
General Washington had many Generals that filled various roles at the encampment at Valley Forge.
Young Continental Army officer sitting behind field desk. Washington's Aides-de-camp
The young officers that assisted Gen. Washington during Valley Forge.
Continental soldiers shoulder to shoulder hold musket against left side of body. Lesser known members of the Army
List of lesser known members of the Continental Army
A woman in a blue gown stands in front of a soldier.Women at Valley Forge
Women played an important role at Valley Forge.
Black enlisted soldier speaking with visitorsPatriots of Color at Valley Forge
Many soldiers of African and/or American Indian heritage served at Valley Forge.
Oneida warrior wearing blue traditional garb with drum in hand.American Indian Allies at Valley Forge
American Indian Allies played an important role during the Valley Forge encampment.
 Last updated: January 12, 2021
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 1400 North Outer Line Drive
King of Prussia,
PA
19406
 Phone: 610 783-1000 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5320 

To suspend the collection of income taxes and related interest and penalties 

from United States nationals who are unlawfully or wrongfully detained 

abroad and to reimburse such nationals for any penalties paid during 

such a detention. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20, 2022 

Mr. COONS (for himself and Mr. ROUNDS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend the collection of income taxes and related interest 

and penalties from United States nationals who are unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad and to reimburse 

such nationals for any penalties paid during such a detention. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5320 IS

1 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF FINES AND INTEREST ON TAX 

2 DELINQUENCIES OF CERTAIN IMPRISONED 

3 EXPATRIATES. 

4 Section 302 of the Robert Levinson Hostage Recov5 ery and Hostage-Taking Accountability Act (22 U.S.C. 

6 1741) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(e) DEFERRAL OF INCOME TAX.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For any United States na9 tional listed as being detained unlawfully or wrong10 fully abroad on the annual report required under 

11 subsection (c), the collection of Federal income tax 

12 on the income of such United States national falling 

13 due during such detention shall be deferred until the 

14 date that is 180 days after such United States na15 tional is released from detention, returns to the 

16 United States, or departs the detaining country. 

17 ‘‘(2) REIMBURSEMENT OF PENALTIES PAID AS

18 A RESULT OF WRONGFUL DETENTION ABROAD.—If 

19 the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in consulta20 tion with the Secretary of State, determines that a 

21 United States national described in paragraph (1) 

22 paid penalties for the late payment of Federal in23 come taxes that were due to be paid during the 

24 United States national’s unlawful or wrongful deten25 tion, the Commissioner shall refund the amount so 

26 paid to the United States national. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5320 IS

1 ‘‘(3) ACCRUAL OF INTEREST OR PENALTY.—No 

2 interest or penalty shall accrue for the period of 

3 deferment by reason of nonpayment on any amount 

4 of tax deferred pursuant to paragraph (1). 

5 ‘‘(4) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.—The running 

6 of a statute of limitations against the collection of 

7 any tax deferred pursuant to paragraph (1), by sei8 zure or otherwise, shall be suspended until the date 

9 that is 270 days after the United States national is 

10 released from detention, returns to the United 

11 States, or departs the detaining country. 

12 ‘‘(5) LIMITATION.—This section shall not apply 

13 to any tax imposed on employees under section 3101 

14 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection  with this annual  report on Form 10-KSB of United  Tennessee
Bankshares,  Inc.,  I,  Chris  H.  Triplett,   Controller  of  United  Tennessee
Bankshares,  Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in this report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of United Tennessee Bankshares, Inc.



Date:  March 31, 2005                 /s/ Chris H. Triplett
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Chris H. Triplett
                                      Controller
Order entered October 12, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00201-CV

KIMBERLY GOMEZ, Appellant

V.

SHAHRAM N. SANI, M.D., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-17417

ORDER

On September 8, 2020, appellant informed the Court she had finalized 

settlement with appellees EmCare Holdings, Inc., Poppy Drive Inpatient Services, 

P.L.L.C., Farah Masood, M.D., and Shahram Sani, M.D., and the settlement was 

expected to fund that week. Appellant also informed the Court she was unable to 

settle her claims with the remaining appellees. Based on appellant’s status report, 

we ordered appellant to file a motion to dismiss the appeal as to the settling
appellees no later than September 21, 2020 and her brief as to the remaining 

appellees no later than October 12, 2020. 

Before the Court is appellant’s October 7, 2020 status update and unopposed 

motion for extension of time to file her brief. Appellant informs the Court the 

settling appellees “have yet to fund the settlement,” and she “has no choice but to 

move forward with efforts to enforce the settlement agreement in the trial court.” 

Because of this and other matters, she seeks a thirty-day extension of time to file 

her brief as to the remaining appellees.

We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief as to the remaining 

appellees be filed no later than November 12, 2020. We further ORDER appellant 

to file, no later than October 27, 2020, a letter brief demonstrating a live 

controversy remains as to the merits of the appeal with the settling appellees such 

that the appeal as to them should not be dismissed as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(a); Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes, 827 S.W.2d 859, 

859 (Tex. 2001) (per curiam) (appeal becomes moot if controversy between parties 

ceases to exist due to settlement).

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-213 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1999)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of

Isotopes (ACMUI) has scheduled a public meeting on October 20 in Rockville, Maryland.

The Committee advises the NRC on policy and technical issues that arise in regulating

the medical uses of radioactive byproduct material for diagnosis and therapy.

The Committee will discuss the revision of the NRC’s medical regulations in preparation

for an October 21 Commission briefing, and will review its own performance using established

criteria.

The meeting will be held in room T-2B3 of the NRC’s Two White Flint North building, at

11545 Rockville Pike, from 2:00 until 5:00 p.m.

Those seeking further information on the meeting or wishing to provide a written

statement, should contact Diane Flack, at 301-415-5681.

###
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Bridie Hourigan, Respondent, against F. & M. Schaerer Brewing Company et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

November 17, 2009

Mr. David K. Paylor, Director

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

P.O. Box 1105

Richmond, Virginia 23218 

Dear Mr. Paylor:

On October 15, 2009, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision 

to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of Environmental 

Quality pertaining to the revised definition of “Volatile organic compound,” as well as 

administrative changes to 21 other definitions listed in Section 5-10-20 of 9VAC5, Chapter 10. 

EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is 

reviewing it to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notice (DFRN) action.

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Harold A. 

Frankford, Immediate Office of the Air Protection Division, at (215) 814-2108. He is the 

principal contact for this rulemaking. 

Sincerely, 

Marcia L. Spink, for

 Judith M. Katz, Director

 Air Protection Division 
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

101 Marietta St., Suite 2900, Atlanta, GA 30323

Tel. 404-331-5503 or 7878

No. II-96-67 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Thursday, August 1, 1996)

Roger Hannah 404-331-7878

NRC STAFF TO HOLD ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE IN ATLANTA TO DISCUSS

SURRY NUCLEAR PLANT CONCERNS WITH VIRGINIA POWER

Meeting Will Be Open To Observation By The Public

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will hold a Predecisional Enforcement

Conference in Atlanta at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, August 7 to discuss NRC concerns related to

the hydrogen analyzers inside containment at Virginia Power’s Surry nuclear power plant near

Surry, Virginia.

The meeting will be in the NRC offices at 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900.

NRC officials have regulatory concerns with an apparent violation involving Surry plant

employees failing to maintain the containment hydrogen analyzers in a configuration that would

allow them to perform their safety function.

The predecisional enforcement conference is open to observation by the public under an

NRC policy initiated in 1992 which opens every fourth such meeting to public scrutiny. The

meeting is between the NRC and the licensee, but NRC officials are available at its conclusion to

answer questions from interested observers.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean the NRC has determined

that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee an

opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to

enable the company to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violation or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a

civil penalty, will be made at this conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC

officials at a later time.

Recorded information on upcoming open enforcement conferences also will be available

by calling 1-800-952-9674.
####
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# 10 CFR 20.303 (d) - Disposal by Release Into Sanitary Sewerage Systems

## HPPOS-158 PDR-9111220137

See the excerpt from IE Manual entitled as above and dated February 26, 1973.

Under 10 CFR 20.303 (d), a licensee may release up to one curie per year into any one sewerage system. If a licensee maintains facilities in several cities, each facility could release up to one curie per year provided that separate sewerage systems are involved.

This health physics position also applies to "new" 10 CFR 20.2003 (a) (4). A literal interpretation of 10 CFR 20.303 (d) appears to indicate that the maximum quantity of radioactive material that a licensee may release to a sanitary sewer is one curie per year. While this is essentially true, this also implies that the sum total for all geographical sites under one license may not exceed the above limit, even if a licensee has 10 or 100 facilities spread throughout the country.

OGC advised that the words in the regulation, "... radioactive material released into the sewerage system may not exceed ..." could be construed to mean that no more than one curie may be released into any one sewerage system by a licensee. [Note: 10 CFR 20.2003 (a) (4) states similarly: "The total quantity of licensed and other radioactive material that the licensee releases in the sanitary sewage system in a year does not exceed 5 curies (185 GBq) of hydrogen-3, 1 curie (37GBq) of carbon-14, and 1 curie (37 Gbq) of all other radioactive materials combined."]

"Sewerage systems" are generally local (e.g., city) so that if a licensee maintains facilities in several cities, each facility could release up to one curie per year, provided separate sewerage systems are involved. OGC also advised that this interpretation is consistent with the intent of the regulations, i.e., to maintain releases at a minimum to a sewerage system in the interest of precluding any significant health problems. By contrast, a much worse situation could be conceived where a thousand licensees use the same sewerage system, which is perfectly legal under the present regulations, but would appear to be of greater significance than the above considerations.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 20.303, 10 CFR 20.2003

**Subject codes:** 9.2, 9.7

**Applicability:** All

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 16, 2017