alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 124
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 124 appear at 72 FR 50040, Aug. 30, 2007, and 76 FR 8253, Feb. 11, 2011.

§ 124.102 What size business is eligible to participate in the 8(a) BD program? ( a ) ( 1 ) An applicant concern must qualify as a small business concern as defined in part 121 of this title. The applicable size standard is the one for its primary industry classification. The rules for calculating the size of a tribally-owned concern, a concern owned by an Alaska Native Corporation, a concern owned by a Native Hawaiian Organization, or a concern owned by a Community Development Corporation are additionally affected by §§ 124.109, 124.110, and 124.111, respectively.
( 2 ) In order to remain eligible to participate in the 8(a) BD program after certification, a firm must generally remain small for its primary industry classification, as adjusted during the program. SBA may graduate a Participant prior to the expiration of its program term where the firm exceeds the size standard corresponding to its primary NAICS code, as adjusted, for three successive program years, unless the firm demonstrates that through its growth and development its primary industry is changing, pursuant to the criteria described in 13 CFR 121.107, to a related secondary NAICS code that is contained in its most recently approved business plan. The firm's business plan must contain specific targets, objectives, and goals for its continued growth and development under its new primary industry.
( b ) If 8(a) BD program officials determine that a concern may not qualify as small, they may deny an application for 8(a) BD program admission or may request a formal size determination under part 121 of this title.
( c ) A concern whose application is denied due to size by SBA may request a formal size determination with the SBA Government Contracting Area Office serving the geographic area in which the principal office of the business is located under part 121 of this chapter. Where the SBA Government Contracting Area Office determines that an applicant qualifies as a small business concern for the size standard corresponding to its primary NAICS code: ( 1 ) The AA/BD will certify the concern as eligible to participate in the 8(a) BD program if size was the only reason for decline; or
( 2 ) The concern may reapply for participation in the 8(a) BD program at any point after 90 days from the AA/BD's decline if size was not the only reason for decline. In such a case, the AA/BD will accept the size determination as conclusive of the concern's small business status, provided the applicant concern has not completed an additional fiscal year in the intervening period and SBA believes that the additional fiscal year changes the applicant's size.
[63 FR 35739, June 30, 1998, as amended at 76 FR 8254, Feb. 11, 2011; 88 FR 26204, Apr. 27, 2023]
Exhibit 10.26

THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT (the "Amendment") is made effective as of the 16th day of June 2002 and shall hereby
constitute the third amendment to the employment agreement, dated October 27, 1997, and effective as of June 18, 1997, as amended on March 13, 2000 and May 21, 2001 (the
"Agreement"), and is made by and between Duane Reade Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Anthony Cuti (the "Executive").
Capitalized terms that are not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company entered into the Agreement, effective June 18, 1997, and Executive is currently employed by the Company under the
Agreement; and

WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 34 of the Agreement, the Company and the Executive may amend the Agreement by an instrument in writing, signed by the Executive and the Chairman of
the Board of Directors of the Company; and

WHEREAS,
the parties desire to enter into this Amendment, which Amendment shall be effective as of the date first set forth above;

NOW
THEREFORE, and in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual agreements set forth herein, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:

1.Amendments.

(a)Definitions.    (i) Under Section 1 of the Employment Agreement, the following definition is
hereby added after the definition of the definition of "Affiliate" and before the definition of "Base EBITDA
Target":



(ii)  The
definition of "Sale of the Company" under Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its
entirety and replaced by the following:



---



(b)Term of Employment.Section 2(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and
replaced by the following:



2.Continuing Effect of the Agreement.The Agreement shall continue in full force and effect as amended herein.

3.Counterparts.This Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto in counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, but both such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same document.

2

---

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first above written.

| |  | THE EXECUTIVE                                         
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Anthony Cuti
440 Ninth Avenue
New York, New York 10001
| |  | DUANE READE INC.                                      
| |  | By:                                                   
| |  | By:                                                   

3

---

QuickLinks
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Frank Churchirillo, Respondent, against Ester Trotner et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Present — ■ Foster, P. J., Heffeman, Brewster, Deyo and Santry, JJ.
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2007      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            |                      |                                                                             |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            | APPLETON      PAPERS INC. |
|                            |                      |                                                                             |
| Dated:      March 11, 2008 |                      | /s/      Thomas J. Ferree                                                        |
|                            | Name:                     |   Thomas      J. Ferree                                                |
|                            | Title:                    |   Vice      President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roman MORA-GRANADOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40079.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 8, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Raquel Kathy Wilson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Having pleaded guilty, Roman Mora-Granados appeals his conviction and 46-month sentence for being illegally present in the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Mora-Granados’s constitutional challenge to § 1326 is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although he contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule it in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Mora-Granados properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it to preserve it for further review. Accordingly, the conviction is affirmed.

*909Mora-Granados contends that his sentence must be vacated because he was sentenced pursuant to mandatory guidelines that were held unconstitutional in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Although he asserts that the error in his case is structural and not susceptible of harmless error analysis, we have rejected this specific argument. *See United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 463 (5th Cir.2005).

In the alternative, Mora-Granados contends that the government cannot show that the sentencing error was harmless. We review this preserved challenge to the sentence for harmless error under Fed. R.CkimJP. 52(a). *See Walters,*418 F.3d at 463.

The government concedes that the record does not indicate that the district court would have imposed the same sentence under an advisory guidelines regime. *See United States v. Garza,*429 F.3d 165, 170-71 (5th Cir.2005), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1444, 164 L.Ed.2d 143 (2006) (No. 05-8843). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### **CHAPTER 2A—CHILDREN'S BUREAU**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-7822-9]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of grantee performance evaluation reports.

# SUMMARY:

EPA's grant regulations (40 CFR 35.115) require the Agency to evaluate the performance of agencies which receive grants. EPA's regulations for regional consistency (40 CFR 56.7) require that the Agency notify the public of the availability of the reports of such evaluations. EPA performed end-of-year evaluations of one state air pollution control program (Commonwealth of Kentucky); and three local programs (Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District, KY; Memphis-Shelby County Health Department, TN; and Knox County Department of Air Quality Management, TN). The four evaluations were conducted to assess the agencies' performance under the grants awarded by EPA under authority of section 105 of the Clean Air Act. EPA Region 4 has prepared reports for each agency identified above and these reports are now available for public inspection.

# ADDRESSES:

The reports may be examined at the EPA's Region 4 office, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303, in the Air, Pesticides, and Toxics Management Division.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marie Persinger (404) 562-9048 for information concerning the State of Kentucky and the local agency of Louisville, Kentucky; and Rayna D. Brown (404) 562-9093 for the local agencies of Knox County, Tennessee and Memphis-Shelby County, Tennessee. They may be contacted at the above Region 4 address.

      ( print page 58912)    
Dated: September 16, 2004.

A. Stanley Meiburg,

Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 4.

[FR Doc. 04-22085 Filed 9-30-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Michael B. Wheeler, certify that:1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2005 of Tufco Technologies, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 14, 2006   /s/ Michael B. Wheeler Michael B. Wheeler  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  19
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 65

**Question 65:** The following question concerns OMB approval of the information collection requirements of the revised Part 20. Section 20.1008 indicates that licensees shall implement the provisions of all sections of revised Part 20 on or before January 1, 1993 and that if a licensee chooses to implement revised Part 20 before then, the licensee shall implement all provisions of revised Part 20 not otherwise exempted by subsection 20.1008 (d). However, section 20.1009 says that the information collection requirements of the revised Part 20 will not become effective until OMB approves them. Does this mean that before OMB approval is obtained, a licensee can implement all of the provisions of the revised Part 20 except the information collection requirements?

**Answer:** OMB approval of the information collection requirements of revised Part 20 was obtained on January 24, 1992, with the exception of NRC Forms 4 and 5. OMB approval for these forms is expected in the future.

(References: 10 CFR 20.1008, 10 CFR 20.1009)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, December 13, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-22584-CIV-ALTONAGA/Goodman

EMILIO PINERO, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

RIVER INN SRD LLC,

Defendant.

_____________________/

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Notice of Settlement [ECF No. 20], 

filed on October 9, 2020. The Court having carefully reviewed the file, and being otherwise 

fully advised, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The above-styled action is administratively CLOSED without prejudice to the parties 

to file a stipulation for dismissal within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order. 

2. If the parties fail to complete the expected settlement, either party may request the 

Court to reopen the case.

3. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case for administrative purposes only. Any pending 

motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 9th day of October, 2020.

 _________________________________

 CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-22584-CMA Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/09/2020 Page 1 of 1
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateAdvisory Activities

# Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes

The Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes (ACMUI) advises the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on policy and technical issues that arise in the regulation of the medical uses of radioactive material in diagnosis and therapy. The ACMUI membership includes health care professionals from various disciplines, who comment on changes to NRC regulations and guidance; evaluate certain non-routine uses of radioactive material; provide technical assistance in licensing, inspection, and enforcement cases; and bring key issues to the attention of the Commission for appropriate action.

As an official advisory body to the NRC staff, the ACMUI's operational practices are governed by the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Advisory committees are structured to provide a forum where experts representing many technical perspectives can provide independent advice that is factored into the NRC’s decision-making process.

See the following for more information:
            - ACMUI Membership
            - ACMUI Recommendations and Actions
            - ACMUI Subcommittees
            - ACMUI History
            - ACMUI Charter
            - ACMUI Bylaws
            - Contact Us

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 29, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
          - Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Related Information

            - ACMUI Meetings and Subcommittee Reports

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 29, 2024
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

World War I Memorial
District of Columbia
10/4/21, 12:04 PM Dame Michael 

HOMO 

<m 

Chris Chance 

To: John Mountioy 

t\ \/ 

Yesterday 

John, please add me to 

your Linkedln network 

Min MountiOy 

Hi John, I'd like to join your Llrrkedln network. 

Chris Chance 

Account Exec:ul.ive taC Hobart Hill 

Loolsvde. Kffini.K:ky Ai Ohl 

View profile 

gc4titttolOtr I liclp 

Accept 

191 ,1 WO ICICCeVing 

Thiti on) ioati ,2,1tifIded dor John Mounljoy 01y.oculive 

Ihhhootoi, 1<entuhky Flood Stmt Ahoocihhon). 

....... 100.11,11101101111011401111h 1

Ujilted11111 

)202. tlbn r ion 1000 O, 

Jan 29, 2020, 8:20 AM 

Chuck Bradley 

It was but it moved and Shay tried to get it off by torching it. It was sent back to Kkm to take a look. 

He sent it to to show what he was doing to barrrks and how odd the fit was. 

Jan 25, 2020, 8:41 PM 

Dame Michael 

So that nasty barrel you sent me pits of. That sleeve can not be tungsten, you cant gouge it the way 

that is. And the barrel and sleeve have been welded 

Jan 25, 2020, 8:19 PM 

Chuck Bradley 

file:///C:/Users/HaganW/Desktop/Documents from C. Bradley/akaithumb/F /FBMESSENGER/facebook-chuckdvc/messages/inbox/damemichael... 22/276 

SCI 000922 CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-140 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
<page>                                          EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter World
Currency Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey
A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:  /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:   Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:  President

Date:   August 15, 2005