alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         908,578
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,269,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  9,056,484
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,903,632
<PP&E>                                      17,130,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,864,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,531,053
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,046
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,213,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,864,944
<SALES>                                     20,700,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,700,816
<CGS>                                       17,047,102
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,047,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,117,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             239,695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,549,915
<INCOME-TAX>                                   573,508
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            976,407
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   976,407
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21


</TABLE>
### §2512. Disbursing officers; relief

Whenever the United States Court of Federal Claims finds that any loss by a disbursing officer of the United States was without his fault or negligence, it shall render a judgment setting forth the amount thereof, and the Government Accountability Office shall allow the officer such amount as a credit in the settlement of his accounts.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 978; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §139(j)(2), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 43; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §253 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §147, 36 Stat. 1137; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, §304, 42 Stat. 24).

Words "paymaster, quartermaster, commissary of subsistence, or other" were omitted as covered by words "disbursing officer of the United States". (See reviser's note under section 1496 of this title.)

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office".

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "United States Claims Court" for "Court of Claims".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.
Exhibit 31.1 

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**pursuant to Section 302 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, David B. Kaysen, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of DiametricsMedical, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: October 24, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Nathan Katz, Relator, against Warden of the Civil Prison, County of Kings, Defendant.

Writ dismissed and relator remanded. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
No: 23-011 February 24, 2023 

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Releases La Crosse Nuclear Power Plant Site for Public Use

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has released the site of the La Crosse Boiling Water 

Reactor in Wisconsin for unrestricted public use. The action comes after LaCrosseSolutions

successfully decommissioned the facility to meet the NRC’s radiation protection standards. 

The La Crosse plant was a boiling water reactor operated by the Dairyland Power 

Cooperative from 1967 to 1987, located near Genoa, Wisconsin, in Vernon County. The license 

was transferred to LaCrosseSolutions in 2016 to complete decommissioning and will be 

transferred back to the Dairyland Power Cooperative now that decommissioning is completed. 

As a result, the licensed site will be reduced to the area covered by the La Crosse 

independent spent fuel storage installation. Dairyland Power Cooperative will remain responsible 

for the security and protection of the storage facility and is required to maintain $100 million in 

liability insurance coverage until the fuel has been removed from the site. Dairyland Power 

Cooperative will also be required to safely decommission the spent fuel storage facility and the 

remainder of the site once the fuel is removed.

LaCrosseSolutions submitted final status surveys of the site and requested the 

unconditional site release in February 2020. A partial site release was approved by the NRC in 

May 2022, and the current action releases the remainder of the site outside the spent fuel storage 

installation. The NRC staff evaluated the surveys, conducted inspections and reviewed 

confirmatory analyses before concluding that the site meets the NRC criteria to be released for 

unrestricted use.
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5328 

AN ACT 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act 

of 2002 to extend terminal lakes assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 5328 ES

1 SECTION 1. TERMINAL LAKES ASSISTANCE. 

2 Section 2507(f) of the Farm Security and Rural In3 vestment Act of 2002 (16 U.S.C. 3839bb–6(f)) is amend4 ed by striking ‘‘2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2025’’. 

Passed the Senate December 20, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5328 

AN ACT 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment 

Act of 2002 to extend terminal lakes assistance.
### §115. Repeal of conflicting acts

All acts and parts of acts in conflict with the provisions of this chapter are repealed.

(Mar. 23, 1932, ch. 90, §15, 47 Stat. 73.)
§ 206.375 Loan administration. ( a ) *Funding.* ( 1 ) FEMA will disburse funds to the local government when requested, generally in accordance with the Schedule of Loan Increments in the Promissory Note. As funds are disbursed, interest will accrue against each disbursement.
( 2 ) When each incremental disbursement is requested, the local government shall submit a copy of its most recent financial report (if not submitted previously) for consideration by FEMA in determining whether the level and frequency of periodic payments continue to be justified. The local government shall also provide the latest available data on anticipated and actual tax and other revenue collections. Desired adjustments in the disbursement schedule shall be submitted in writing at least 10 days prior to the proposed disbursement date in order to ensure timely receipt of the funds.
( b ) *Financial management.* ( 1 ) Each local government with an approved Special Community Disaster Loan shall establish necessary accounting records, consistent with local government's financial management system, to account for loan funds received and disbursed and to provide an audit trail.
( 2 ) FEMA auditors, State auditors, the GAR, the Regional Administrator, the Assistant Administrator for the Disaster Assistance Directorate, the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General, and the Comptroller General of the United States or their duly authorized representatives shall, for the purpose of audits and examination, have access to any books, documents, papers, and records that pertain to Federal funds, equipments, and supplies received under §§ 206.370 through 206.377.
( c ) *Loan servicing.* ( 1 ) The applicant annually shall submit to FEMA copies of its annual financial reports (operating statements, balance sheets, etc.) for the fiscal year of the major disaster, and for each of the 3 subsequent fiscal years.
( 2 ) FEMA will review the loan periodically. The purpose of the reevaluation is to determine whether projected revenue losses, disaster-related expenses, operating budgets, and other factors have changed sufficiently to warrant adjustment of the scheduled disbursement of the loan proceeds.
( 3 ) FEMA shall provide each loan recipient with a loan status report on a quarterly basis. The recipient will notify FEMA of any changes of the responsible municipal official who executed the Promissory Note.
( d ) *Inactive loans.* If no funds have been disbursed from the loan program, and if the local government does not anticipate a need for such funds, the note may be cancelled at any time upon a written request through the State and Regional Office to FEMA.
[70 FR 60446, Oct. 18, 2005]
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0110 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-148-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
### **CHAPTER 179—JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CERTAIN ACTIONS BY PRESIDENTIAL OFFICES**

Sec.
3901.
Civil actions.
3902.
Judicial review of regulations.
3903.
Effect of failure to issue regulations.
3904.
Expedited review of certain appeals.
3905.
Attorney's fees and interest.
3906.
Payments.
3907.
Other judicial review prohibited.
3908.
Definitions.
### §1382. Determination and collection of liability; notification of employer

When an employer withdraws from a multiemployer plan, the plan sponsor, in accordance with this part, shall—

(1) determine the amount of the employer's withdrawal liability,

(2) notify the employer of the amount of the withdrawal liability, and

(3) collect the amount of the withdrawal liability from the employer.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title IV, §4202, as added Pub. L. 96–364, title I, §104(2), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1218.)
Document

    Exhibit 10.13
    







January 29, 2021


Scott Goldenberg
The TJX Companies, Inc.
770 Cochituate Road
Framingham, MA 01701


Re:    Letter Agreement


Dear Mr. Goldenberg,


    Reference is made to the employment agreement between you and The TJX Companies, Inc. (“TJX” or “Company”) dated February 2, 2018, as amended (the “Employment Agreement”).  Subject to earlier termination as provided therein, your employment with TJX under the Employment Agreement will continue until January 30, 2021.  By entering into this letter agreement with TJX (the “Letter Agreement”), you agree to extend your employment with TJX under the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement, effective as of the date hereof, with the following modifications:
1.Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the third-to-last sentence thereof with the following:
“Subject to earlier termination as provided herein, Executive’s employment hereunder shall continue on the terms provided herein until February 3, 2024 (the ‘End Date’).”
2.The last sentence of Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
“The rate at which Executive’s Base Salary shall be paid shall be $976,000 per year or such other rate (not less than $976,000 per year) as the Committee may determine after Committee review not less frequently than annually.”
Except as otherwise amended by this Letter Agreement, the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.  You acknowledge and agree that your employment with TJX under the Employment Agreement shall continue from and after the date hereof in accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended by this Letter Agreement. 


If you agree with the foregoing, please so indicate by signing the enclosed copy of this Letter
Agreement in the space indicated below and returning it to the Company, whereupon this Letter
Agreement will take effect as of the date hereof.  This Letter Agreement shall constitute an agreement under seal.


[Signature Page Follows]








        THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.
By:   /s/ Ernie Herrman                                
Name: Ernie Herrman
Title: Chief Executive Officer and President








EXECUTIVE:
   /s/ Scott Goldenberg            1/29/2021      
Name: Scott Goldenberg


    
    -2-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

HEYWOOD BECKER, TRUSTEE OF

HANOVERIAN TRUST AND HANOVERIAN TRUST,

v.

ZONING HEARING BOARD OF

STRABAN TOWNSHIP

PETITION OF: HEYWOOD BECKER

AND HANOVERIAN TRUST :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 698 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of March, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
No: 23-022 March 13, 2023 

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Proposes FY 2024 Budget to Congress

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing to Congress a budget of $156 million 

in net appropriations for fiscal year 2024. The budget request proposes $1.006 billion in gross 

budget authority, an increase of $63.2 million over the agency’s enacted budget for FY 2023. 

The budget request also proposes the use of $27.1 million in carryover funds to offset the nuclear 

reactor safety budget, resulting in an adjusted gross budget authority of $979.2 million. The NRC 

expects to recover $823.2 million of its budget in license fees. 

Details of the budget request include: 

• Funding of $530.8 million for nuclear reactor safety, including $425.8 million for 

operating reactors and $105 million for new reactors. 

• Funding of $152.9 million for nuclear materials and waste safety. 

• Funding of $34.2 million for the continued development of a regulatory infrastructure 

and staff capabilities for licensing of advanced nuclear reactor and fuel cycle 

technologies. 

• Funding of $23.8 million for international activities. 

• Funding of $2 million for minority serving institution grants. 

• Funding of $18.6 million for the Office of Inspector General, including funding to 

provide inspector general services for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

• Support for 2,948.9 full-time equivalent employees, including the OIG, an increase of 

89.3 FTE from the agency’s FY 2023 enacted budget. 

The FY 2024 Congressional Budget Justification and summary presentation slides are 

available on the NRC website.
§ 108.1830 NMVC Company's Capital Impairment definition and general requirements. ( a ) *Significance of Capital Impairment condition.* If you have a condition of Capital Impairment, you are not in compliance with the terms of your Leverage. As a result, SBA has the right to impose the applicable remedies for noncompliance in § 108.1810(g).
( b ) *Definition of Capital Impairment condition.* You have a condition of Capital Impairment if your Capital Impairment Percentage, as computed in § 108.1840, exceeds 70 percent.
( c ) *Quarterly computation requirement and procedure.* You must determine whether you have a condition of Capital Impairment as of the end of each fiscal quarter. You must notify SBA promptly if you are capitally impaired.
( d ) *SBA's right to determine NMVC Company's Capital Impairment condition.* SBA may make its own determination of your Capital Impairment condition at any time.
**Exhibit 32.1**

****

**CERTIFICATION**



******PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connect with the quarterly
report of Tayco Developments, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended February 29, 2004 to be filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on
or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas P. Taylor, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.



|Date: April 13, 2004 | By: | /s/ Douglas P. Taylor                    
|-------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------
|                     |     | Douglas P. Taylor,Chief Executive Officer
# C_2005321EN.01002202.xml

| 16.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/22

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3980 — Canon/Canon España)

(2005/C 321/15)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 18 November 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3980. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3980. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### In the Matter of the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Hedda Jewel Co., Inc. Sydney B. Levy, Assignee-Appellant; Samuel Durst et al., Respondents.

Order appealed from unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the sale by the marshal vacated, upon the ground that more property was sold under the execution than that which was specified in the marshal’s notice of sale. The judgment-debtor’s assets having been transferred to an assignee for the benefit of creditors, the respondent purchaser should be directed to restore to said assignee the property coming into his hands by reason of the sale. In disposing of this property, the assignee must recognize that the judgment-creditor obtained a lien upon certain of these assets by levy made prior to the taking effect of the assignment for the benefit of creditors. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.