alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

61 Forsyth Street SW

Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-06 February 1, 2000

CONTACT: Kenneth M. Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC Dispatches Augmented Inspection Team to Review

Shutdown at Hatch Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has dispatched an Augmented Inspection Team (AIT) to review

the circumstances surrounding an automatic shutdown of Unit 1 at Southern Nuclear Operating

Company’s Hatch nuclear power plant, located near Baxley in southern Georgia, on January 26. The

AIT will assess equipment and personnel performance as well as company actions in response to the

shutdown.

Unit 1 automatically shut down from 100% power when a valve in one of the two main lines carrying

water to the reactor closed. Southern Nuclear has informed the NRC that it believes the valve closed

when the switch was bumped. Some of the equipment did not operate as expected and plant operators

cooled the plant down to investigate the cause of the shutdown and subsequent equipment problems.

NRC resident inspectors initially followed the event, but inspectors from NRC headquarters and the

regional office in Atlanta, who will serve on the special team, arrived at the plant site this past

weekend. The AIT includes experts in boiling water reactor systems and operations and a valve

specialist.

When the inspection is completed, the inspectors will meet with the company to discuss their

preliminary findings. This meeting will be open to public observation, and the time and location will

be announced later.

The NRC team will issue a written report which will be available to the public several weeks after the

completion of the inspection.

#####
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kaiser Ventures LLC (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as
amended on Form 10-KSB/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), we, Richard E. Stoddard, Chief Executive Officer and James F. Verhey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 6, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard E. Stoddard                 
|                     |  |  |  | Richard E. Stoddard                     
|                     |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board, President & CEO  
|                     |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | /s/ James F. Verhey                     
|                     |  |  |  | James F. Verhey                         
|                     |  |  |  | Executive Vice President - CFO          
|                     |  |  |  | Principal Financial & Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic, version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Report on Form
10-KSB/A pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, the deemed filed by the Company for purposed of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporated it by
reference.
### §2406. Credits in actions by United States; prior disallowance

In an action by the United States against an individual, evidence supporting the defendant's claim for a credit shall not be admitted unless he first proves that such claim has been disallowed, in whole or in part, by the Government Accountability Office, or that he has, at the time of the trial, obtained possession of vouchers not previously procurable and has been prevented from presenting such claim to the Government Accountability Office by absence from the United States or unavoidable accident.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 972; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §774 (R.S., §§236, 951; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, §§304, 305, 42 Stat. 24).

Word "action" was substituted for "suits", in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Section 774 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., provided that "no claim for a credit shall be admitted, upon trial", etc. This was changed to "evidence supporting the defendant's claim for a credit shall not be admitted", to clarify the meaning of the section. The case of U.S. v. Heard, D.C.Va. 1940, 32 F.Supp. 39, reviews the conflicting decisions on the question whether compliance with the section must be pleaded, and offers persuasive argument that it need not be, and that the section was designed as a rule of evidence. The wording of the remainder of the section also supports this conclusion, as pointed out by Judge Learned Hand in U.S. v. Standard Aircraft Corp., D.C.N.Y. 1926, 16 F.2d 307, followed in the Heard case.

Changes in phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office" in two places.
Docket No. FAA-2016-5044 Dir ID 2014-NM-166-AD
#### Abel Gottheimer et al., v. Walter Reade, Sr., et al.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 698.]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-59 May 23, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPUN) on Wednesday morning,

May 28, to discuss the results of NRC's assessment of the May 13

remedial emergency exercise at GPUN's Three Mile Island Nuclear

Station Unit 1. They also will discuss actions GPUN has taken to

address the weaknesses observed during the March emergency

exercise at the facility.

The meeting, which begins at 10:00 a.m., will be held in the

GPUN Training Center at the TMI site. It is open to the public

for observation only.

#
### §1191c. Regulations

The Secretary, consistent with section 104 of the Health Care Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, may promulgate such regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this part. The Secretary may promulgate any interim final rules as the Secretary determines are appropriate to carry out this part.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §734, formerly §707, as added Pub. L. 104–191, title I, §101(a), Aug. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 1951; renumbered §734, Pub. L. 104–204, title VI, §603(a)(3), Sept. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 2935.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 104 of the Health Care Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, referred to in text, probably means section 104 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104–191, which is set out as a note under section 300gg–92 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to group health plans for plan years beginning after June 30, 1997, except as otherwise provided, see section 101(g) of Pub. L. 104–191, set out as a note under section 1181 of this title.
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual report of Fellows Energy Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form
10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George S. Young,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Fellows Energy Ltd. and will be retained by Fellows Energy Ltd. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
      March 5, 2009
            By: /s/ GEORGE S.
      YOUNGGeorge
      S. YoungChief
      Executive Officer
### §122. Shipments into States for possession or sale in violation of State law

The shipment or transportation, in any manner or by any means whatsoever, of any spirituous, vinous, malted, fermented, or other intoxicating liquor of any kind, from one State, Territory, or District of the United States, or place noncontiguous to but subject to the jurisdiction thereof, into any other State, Territory, or District of the United States, or place noncontiguous to but subject to the jurisdiction thereof, or from any foreign country into any State, Territory, or District of the United States, or place noncontiguous to but subject to the jurisdiction thereof, which said spirituous, vinous, malted, fermented, or other intoxicating liquor is intended, by any person interested therein, to be received, possessed, sold, or in any manner used, either in the original package or otherwise, in violation of any law of such State, Territory, or District of the United States, or place noncontiguous to but subject to the jurisdiction thereof, is prohibited.

(Aug. 27, 1935, ch. 740, §202(b), 49 Stat. 877.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the act of Mar. 1, 1913, ch. 90, §1, 37 Stat. 699.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Act Mar. 1, 1913, is popularly known as the "Webb-Kenyon Act".
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-22768-CIV-WILLIAMS

CHARTER REALTY GROUP,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’s

Report and Recommendation (DE 49) on Plaintiff's Motion for Choice of Law 

Determination (DE 30) and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (DE 29). Neither Party filed 

objections to the Report.

Upon an independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable case law, 

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report (DE 49) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Choice of Law Determination (DE 30) is DENIED. Florida 

substantive law shall apply to this case. 

3. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (DE 29) is GRANTED. The Complaint is 

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff shall file an amended 

complaint within 14 days of the date of this Order. 

Case 1:20-cv-22768-KMW Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/08/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 8th day of January, 2021.

Case 1:20-cv-22768-KMW Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/08/2021 Page 2 of 2
# Den Europæiske Unions C 18A/25.

| | ISSN 1725-2393 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 18A |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 49. årgang25. januar 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2393

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 18A

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

49. årgang25. januar 2006

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Oplysninger |
| | Den Europæiske Fødevaresikkerhedsautoritet |
| 2006/C 018A/1 | Indkaldelse af interessetilkendegivelser med henblik på hvervet som medlem af den videnskabelige komité og ekspertpanelerne i Den Europæiske Fødevaresikkerhedsautoritet (Tidsfristen for indkaldelse af interessetilkendegivelser forlænges til 17. februar 2006) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

III   Oplysninger

Den Europæiske Fødevaresikkerhedsautoritet

2006/C 018A/1

Indkaldelse af interessetilkendegivelser med henblik på hvervet som medlem af den videnskabelige komité og ekspertpanelerne i Den Europæiske Fødevaresikkerhedsautoritet (Tidsfristen for indkaldelse af interessetilkendegivelser forlænges til 17. februar 2006)

1

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

III Oplysninger

Den Europæiske Fødevaresikkerhedsautoritet

| 25.1.2006 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CA 18/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2006

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CA 18/1

---

INDKALDELSE AF INTERESSETILKENDEGIVELSER MED HENBLIK PÅ HVERVET SOM MEDLEM AF DEN VIDENSKABELIGE KOMITÉ OG EKSPERTPANELERNE I DEN EUROPÆISKE FØDEVARESIKKERHEDSAUTORITET

(Tidsfristen for indkaldelse af interessetilkendegivelser forlænges til den 17. februar 2006)

(2006/C 18 A/01)

Som offentliggjort i
  Den Europæiske Unions Tidende C 289 A af 22. november 2005, side 6, er ansøgningsfristen den 7. januar 2006. Da der imidlertidig tilsyneladende er tilbagevendende problemer med elektroniske ansøgninger, navnlig i den sidste uge inden ansøgningsfristens udløb, forlænges tidsfristen for indkaldelse af interessetilkendegivelser indtil fredag den 17. februar 2006.

Med denne indkaldelse opfordres videnskabelige eksperter til at tilkendegive deres interesse for at blive medlem af den videnskabelige komité eller et af de stående ekspertpaneler i Den Europæiske Fødevaresikkerhedsautoritet, som er oprettet ved Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 178/2002 af 28. januar 2002 om generelle principper og krav i fødevarelovgivningen, om oprettelse af Den Europæiske Fødevaresikkerhedsautoritet og om procedurer i fødevaresikkerhedsanliggender. Autoriteten har fast hjemsted i Parma, Italien.

---
SUMMARY OF TREASURY OFFSET PROGRAM CHILD 

SUPPORT COLLECTION ACTIVITY

Collections - Financial Management Service (FMS) offsets federal tax refund payments and 

certain non-tax payments to collect past due child support obligations under its Treasury 

Offset Program (TOP). In fiscal year 2004, total TOP collections for delinquent child 

support obligations from both tax and non-tax payments were $1.49 billion, slightly less than 

the $1.52 billion collected in fiscal year 2003. The amount collected by offset since the 

publication of the Executive Order in September 1996 through fiscal year 2004 totals $11.1 

billion. 

Collections from non-tax payments for fiscal year 2004 totaled $2.6 million, slightly less 

than the $3.1 million collected in fiscal year 2003. 

State Participation – The dollar amount of delinquent child support debts referred to FMS 

for collection from non-tax federal payments increased from $34.8 billion at the end of fiscal 

year 2003 to $39.4 billion at the end of fiscal year 2004. The number of cases submitted to 

FMS for non-tax offset in fiscal year 2004 totaled 3.2 million, the same number of cases 

submitted to FMS for this purpose in fiscal year 2003. 

$1.39

$1.64

$1.47 $1.52 $1.49

$0.0

$0.2

$0.4

$0.6

$0.8

$1.0

$1.2

$1.4

$1.6

$1.8

$2.0

Dollars in Billions

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Fiscal Year

CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTIONS THROUGH 

THE TREASURY OFFSET PROGRAM
#### §§ 206.182-206.190 [Reserved]
#### § 19.550 Sex as a bona fide occupational qualification.

A recipient may take action otherwise prohibited by §§ 19.500 through 19.550 provided it is shown that sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for that action, such that consideration of sex with regard to such action is essential to successful operation of the employment function concerned. A recipient shall not take action pursuant to this section that is based upon alleged comparative employment characteristics or stereotyped characterizations of one or the other sex, or upon preference based on sex of the recipient, employees, students, or other persons, but nothing contained in this section shall prevent a recipient from considering an employee's sex in relation to employment in a locker room or toilet facility used only by members of one sex.
PUBLIC LAW 110–216—MAY 7, 2008 122 STAT. 729 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3988: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Jan. 22, considered and passed House. 

Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–216 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3701 Altamesa 

Boulevard in Fort Worth, Texas, as the ‘‘Master Sergeant Kenneth N. Mack 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MASTER SERGEANT KENNETH N. MACK POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 3701 Altamesa Boulevard in Fort Worth, Texas, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Master Sergeant Kenneth 

N. Mack Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Master Sergeant Kenneth N. Mack Post Office Building’’. 

Approved May 7, 2008. 

May 7, 2008 

[H.R. 3988] 


jbridges on POFP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS
#### § 428.6 Where to submit required forms and information.

You must submit the appropriate completed RRA form(s) to each district westwide that is subject to the acreage limitation provisions and in which you provide services.
No: III-23-005 March 7, 2023 

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662 

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663 

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at Byron Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected John Robbins 

as the new senior resident inspector at the Byron nuclear power plant. 

The two-unit site is operated by Constellation Energy Company. 

Robbins joined the NRC in 2004 as a Region III reactor 

engineer. Most recently, he was an operator licensing examiner, also in 

Region III. He was previously a resident inspector at the Bryon and 

LaSalle nuclear power plants and spent time as an acting senior resident 

inspector at the Monticello, Cooper and LaSalle nuclear power plants. 

“John brings considerable knowledge of nuclear operations, 

operator licensing and engineering systems to his new position. His 

extensive experience as a federal inspector coupled with his ability to 

carry out the agency’s safety mission make him a great addition to the resident inspector office at 

Byron,” said Region III Administrator Jack Giessner. 

Prior to joining the agency, he served four years in the U.S. Navy as an aviation electronics 

technician. Robbins earned a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Clemson University.

Each commercial nuclear power plant site in the United States has at least two resident 

inspectors who monitor day-to-day operations at the plant. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears 

at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring significant work projects and interacting with 

plant workers and the public.
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-51116, 33-39557, 33-39566, 333-17843) pertaining to the Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, the Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Officer Bonus Program, the Amended, Restated and SubstitutedKaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Stock Plan, and the Kaiser Ventures Inc. 1995 Stock Plan, as amended, respectively, of our report dated March 14, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Kaiser Ventures LLCand Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Moss Adams LLP 

Irvine, California 

March 18, 2008
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:18 AM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Elman, Barry 

Subject: Time for discussion about EPA's RIA results compared to EIA and RFF projections 

Hi Bob, 

On our end, the best time for this discussion is from 10-11 am tomorrow. In particular, we’d like to 

better understand how EPA’s projection of GHG reductions, esp. in the shorter term (pre-2020, 

before the EE kicks in) compare with the projections from EIA and from RFF. 

EIA results for $10 and $15/ton CO2 price can be found here: 

http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/aeo/tablebrowser/#release=AEO2013&subject=4-AEO2013&table=17-

AEO2013®ion=1-0&cases=co2fee15-d021413a,co2fee10-d021413a,ref2013-d102312a

For the Electric Power sector, the reference CO2 emissions in 2020 are 2,081 million metric tons 

(MMT), at $10/ton CO2 they are projected to be 1,856 MMT, and at $15/ton CO2 they are 1,632 

MMT. Is this difference in projections due to the different start date of their carbon price versus 

the GHG rule kicking in, or something else? Additionally, why are their base case projections for 

2020 lower than the reference case from IPM, since IPM uses AEO 2013 as the basis for the 

power sector? 

The RFF paper can be found here: 

http://www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF-DP-13-23-REV.pdf

The Appendix, on page 26, has the model results for comparison. 

 

If tomorrow doesn’t work, I can give you times for next week. 

Regards, 

Cortney
#### The People of the State of New York v. Edward Ciszenski, Alias, etc.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present— Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.