alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-20788

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SOUL MARTINES CRUS, also known as Saul Ruis, also known as Saul Cruz 

Martinez, also known as Saul Omar Martinez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-383-1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Soul Martines Crus has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Martines Crus has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and 

the relevant parts of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 2, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 12-20788 Document: 00512887978 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/02/2015
No. 12-20788

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw pursuant to Anders is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Counsel’s motion to withdraw 

based on the closing of her law practice is DENIED as unnecessary.

2

 Case: 12-20788 Document: 00512887978 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/02/2015
#### § 208.42 Reimbursement for other administrative costs.

Costs incurred for conducting after-action meetings and preparing after-action reports must be billed as direct costs in accordance with DHS administrative policy.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.1724 Servicing and liquidation expenses.

All ordinary and reasonable expenses of servicing and liquidating Seller's Pool Loan shall be paid by, or be recoverable from, Obligor, and all such ordinary and reasonable expenses incurred by Seller or SBA which are not recoverable from Obligor shall be shared ratably by Seller, SBA, and the Pool Originator pursuant to the applicable percentages set forth in the First Lien Position 504 Loan Pool Guarantee Agreement.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or vld@nrc.gov

I-96-59 September 9, 1996

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Victor Dricks

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE WITH PSE&G

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of Public Service Electric & Gas

Company (of New Jersey) on Wednesday morning, September 11, at a predecisional enforcement conference to

discuss apparent violations of NRC regulations at the Salem nuclear generating station in Lower Alloways Creek,

New Jersey. Those apparent violations include potential discrimination of employees engaged in protected

activities.

The meeting, which is open to the public for observation, will begin at 9:30 a.m. It will be held in the

Paine Meeting Room in the Valley Forge Hilton, 251 West DeKalb Pike, in King of Prussia.

The decision to hold a pre-decisional enforcement conference does not mean that the NRC has determined

that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent

violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out any errors that

may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective

actions. No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this conference. Those decisions will be made by

NRC officials at a later time.

####
Placeholder: confidential business information item

CBI Memo from ICF International on 10-25-2013

For more information please contact David Donaldson by phone at 202-343-9086 or by

email at donaldson.david@epa.gov.
#### Grafton Films, Inc., Appellant, v. Loew’s Incorporated, Respondent.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Exhibit 4.461

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 183419 dated July 16, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Mobile radio telephone communication services in the allocated telecommunications network

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until July 16, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated July 16, 2020 No. 295-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Terlyakov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here
    	
 
    
	
Official seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS
    	
 
    
	
COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
    	
 
    
	
IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
    	
 
    
	
TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 120457
#### The People of the State of New York et al., Respondents, v. Alice M. Heximer et al., Appellants.

Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See *post,*p. 895.]
### §1352. Bonds executed under federal law

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, concurrent with State courts, of any action on a bond executed under any law of the United States, except matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §506, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1743.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

This section is necessary to permit actions in the district courts upon any bond authorized by a law of the United States. In the absence of this new provision, such actions could not be maintained except by the United States, where the amount and other jurisdictional requisites did not exist. The new section also makes clear that it does not affect the right to prosecute such actions in State courts.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–417 inserted exception for matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 applicable with respect to civil actions commenced on or after the 90th day after Nov. 1, 1980, see section 701(c)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-cv-22912-FAM

WINDY LUCIUS,

Plaintiff,

v.

MRKT INC,

Defendant.

/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), with no responsive pleadings having yet been 

filed by Defendant, Plaintiff Windy Lucius hereby gives notice that she voluntarily dismisses all 

claims against Defendant without prejudice, and requests that this Court terminate the action.

Dated: October 8, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ J. Courtney Cunningham

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

FBN: 628166

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, FL 33156

T: 305-351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 8, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system.

/s/ J. Courtney Cunningham

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

Case 1:20-cv-22912-FAM Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/08/2020 Page 1 of 1
No: II-23-035 December 28, 2023 

Contact: Dave Gasperson, 404-997-4417 

NRC Finalizes White Safety Finding for Inoperable Diesel at V.C. Summer 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has finalized an inspection finding as “white” related 

to an inoperable emergency diesel generator at the V.C. Summer nuclear power plant in 

Jenkinsville, South Carolina. Under the NRC’s reactor oversight process, a white inspection finding 

reflects low-to-moderate safety significance.

The finding stems from the discovery of a malfunctioning fuel oil piping for one of the 

emergency diesel generators during routine testing in November 2022. The NRC conducted a 

detailed review and found plant operator Dominion Energy had failed to make necessary 

maintenance or design changes, raising concerns about the plant’s preparedness for emergencies 

involving the loss of offsite power. The agency detailed its findings in an October 2023 inspection 

report. 

During a regulatory conference, Dominion Energy provided new information, including an 

analysis demonstrating the emergency diesel generator could operate for six hours in an emergency. 

As a result of this additional information about the generator’s capacity, the NRC concluded that the 

issue’s safety significance was lower than initially assessed.

“Maintaining the operational readiness of all safety-related equipment is crucial for the 

plant's ability to respond effectively in emergencies,” said NRC Region II Administrator Laura 

Dudes. “While not indicative of immediate risk, this finding underscores the need for continuous 

vigilance and improvement in the plant’s corrective action process.” 

The agency will conduct a supplemental inspection at the plant to ensure that Dominion 

Energy has thoroughly analyzed the root cause of the issue and has implemented effective 

corrective action to prevent recurrence. The results of this inspection will be made available in a 

publicly accessible report.
§ 208.44 Reimbursement for other costs. ( a ) Except as allowed under paragraph (b) of this section, DHS will not reimburse other costs incurred preceding, during or upon the conclusion of an Activation unless, before making the expenditure, the Sponsoring Agency has requested, in writing, permission for a specific expenditure and has received written permission from the Program Manager or his or her designee to make such expenditure.
( b ) At the discretion of the Program Manager or his or her designee, a request for approval of costs presented after the costs were incurred must be in writing and establish that: ( 1 ) The expenditure was essential to the Activation and was reasonable;
( 2 ) Advance written approval by the Program Manager was not feasible; and
( 3 ) Advance verbal approval by the Program Manager had been requested and was given.
#### § 61.16 Probation additional premium.

The additional premium charged pursuant to § 59.24(b) on each policy sold or renewed within a community placed on probation prior to October 1, 1992, is $25.00. Where the community was placed on probation on or after October 1, 1992, the additional premium charge is $50.00.”

[50 FR 36026, Sept. 4, 1985, as amended at 57 FR 19541, May 7, 1992; 74 FR 15340, Apr. 3, 2009]
### **CHAPTER 15—OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH**

Sec.
651.
Congressional statement of findings and declaration of purpose and policy.
652.
Definitions.
653.
Geographic applicability; judicial enforcement; applicability to existing standards; report to Congress on duplication and coordination of Federal laws; workmen's compensation law or common law or statutory rights, duties, or liabilities of employers and employees unaffected.
654.
Duties of employers and employees.
655.
Standards.
656.
Administration.
657.
Inspections, investigations, and recordkeeping.
658.
Citations.
659.
Enforcement procedures.
660.
Judicial review.
661.
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.
662.
Injunction proceedings.
663.
Representation in civil litigation.
664.
Disclosure of trade secrets; protective orders.
665.
Variations, tolerances, and exemptions from required provisions; procedure; duration.
666.
Civil and criminal penalties.
667.
State jurisdiction and plans.
668.
Programs of Federal agencies.
669.
Research and related activities.
669a.
Expanded research on worker health and safety.
670.
Training and employee education.
671.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
671a.
Workers' family protection.
672.
Grants to States.
673.
Statistics.
674.
Audit of grant recipient; maintenance of records; contents of records; access to books, etc.
675.
Annual reports by Secretary of Labor and Secretary of Health and Human Services; contents.
676.
Omitted.
677.
Separability.
678.
Authorization of appropriations.
#### MOSS et al. v. PROFFITT et al.

Jan. 9, 1945.

Dulin Moss and W. C. Marshall for movant.

Arley Proffitt and J. R. Carpenter opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Franklin Circuit Court. Appellants, attorneys, were appointed by the court to defend an alleged indigent prisoner, who was charged with a serious felony. After appellants had performed much work, the prisoner and his wife employed the .appellee, paying him a cash fee of $500. The appellants, by motion, sought to require the appellee to share his fee with them. Their motion was denied.

Appeal denied; Judgment affirmed.
Page 1 of 2 February 7, 2012

Mr. Richard K eigwin, Director

Pesticide Re

- Evaluation Division Office of Pesticide Programs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20460

Dear Mr. Keigwin:

Subject: Poison Control Center Data

- 12 M onth Comparisons

– Domestic Animals

In our January 12, 2012 letter to you, we indicated that 2011 fourth quarter reportable 6(a)2 data

would become available in early February 2012 f rom Safety Call, International, our 24/7 emergency

medical advice line. With these data, we are now able to provide results from a complete year’s (2011) reporting of 6(a)2 reportable domestic animal incidents for our post

- mitigation consumer product s whi ch consist of a bromethalin block with either a Tier 1 or Tier 3 bait station. Data show

0 domestic animal deaths and a 50% reduction of reportable major, moderate and minor

domestic animal incidents.

Mitigation compliant products account for 0 domestic a nimal deaths in over 10 million mouse placements in 201 1 whereas pre

- mitigation products account for 7.1, 2.5 and 2. 4 domestic animal deaths per 10 million mouse placements for 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. See Figure 1.

The major, moderate, and mi nor domestic animal incidents, separated by severity, are shown in Figure 2. T he mitigation compliant products for these categories account for a total of 35.7 domestic animal incidents per 10 million mouse placements in 2011 compared to 71.2

, 72.3 and

7 0. 9 total domestic animal incidents per 10 million mouse placements for 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. The mitigation compliant products show a clear reduction of domestic animal incidents in each category compared to the pre

- mitigation products.

Th e market data for the 12 month period (January 1 through Dec 31, 2012), consisting of post

mitigation products only [bromethalin based block bait with a bait station(s) ] , indicate that the compliant products do meet EPA’s intent under the RMD by substantia lly reducing the reportable

domestic animal incidents

.

Please contact me if you have any questions or need any more information.

Sincerely,

John Lublinkhof, Ph.D. Director of Regulatory AffairsPage 2 of 2 7.1

2.5 2.4

0.0

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0Incidents (per 10MM Placements)

Incidents 7.1 2.5 2.4 0.0 2008 Pre-Mitigation 2009 Pre-Mitigation 2010 Pre-Mitigation 2011 Post Mitigation

71.2 72.3 70.9

35.7

0 25 50 75 100Incidents per 10 MM Placements

Major 2.6 2.2 1.2 0.6

Moderate 24.3 22.1 23.6 10.9

Minor 44.3 48.0 45.8 24.22008 PreMitigation 2009 PreMitigation 2010 PreMitigation 2011 PostMitigation Figure 1

– 6(a)(2) Domestic Animal Deaths for Consumer Products

– 12 month period

Figure 2

- 6(a)(2) Domestic Animals Incidents for Consumer Products

– 12 mo nth period
§ 112.12 Effect on other regulations; forms and instructions. ( a ) *Effect on other regulations.* All regulations, orders or like directions heretofore issued by SBA which impose requirements designed to prohibit any discrimination against individuals on the grounds of race, color, or national origin and which authorize the suspension or termination of or refusal to grant to or to continue financial assistance to any applicant for or recipient of such assistance for failure to comply with such requirements, are hereby superseded to the extent that such discrimination is prohibited by this part, except that nothing in this part shall be deemed to relieve any person of any obligation assumed or imposed under any such superseded regulation, order, instruction, or like direction prior to the effective date of this part. Nothing in this part, however, shall be deemed to supersede any of the following (including future amendments thereof): ( 1 ) Executive Order 11246 and regulations issued thereunder, or
( 2 ) any other orders, regulations or instructions, insofar as such order, regulations, or instructions prohibit discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in any program or situation to which this part is inapplicable or prohibit discrimination on any other ground.
( b ) *Forms and instructions.* SBA shall issue and promptly make available to interested persons forms and detailed instructions and procedures for effectuating this part.
( c ) *Supervision and coordination.* The Administrator may from time to time assign to officials of SBA or to officials of other agencies of the Government with the consent of such agencies, responsibilities in connection with the effectuation of the purpose of Title VI of the Act and this part (other than responsibility for final decision as provided in § 112.13), including the achievement of effective coordination and maximum uniformity within SBA and within the Executive Branch of the Government in the application of Title VI and this part to similar programs and in similar situations. Any action taken, determination made, or requirement imposed by an official of another Department or agency acting pursuant to an assignment of responsibility under this subsection shall have the same effect as though such action had been taken by the Administrator of SBA.
[30 FR 298, Jan. 9, 1965, as amended at 38 FR 17935, July 5, 1973. Redesignated at 49 FR 33629, Aug. 24, 1984]
(No. 806

Claimant awarded $4,066.44.)

#### Vulcanite Roofing Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Franchise *tax*— when *refund may be made.*While the tax erroneously paid may not be recovered, yet on grounds of social justice and equity, a refund may be awarded.

Adams, Follansbee, Hawley & Shorey, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Edward C. Fitch, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim filed by above claimant to recover portions ■ of franchise taxes erroneously paid by above named claimant *155to the Secretary of State of the State of Illinois in the years 1921 and 1922,'total excess tax paid amounting do $4,066.44.

The demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois is, as a matter of law, sustained.

On the grounds of equity and social justice, we award claimant the sum of $4,066.44.
§ 127.602 What are the grounds for filing an EDWOSB or WOSB status protest? ( a ) SBA will consider a protest challenging the status of a concern as an EDWOSB or WOSB if the protest presents sufficient credible evidence to show that the concern may not be owned and controlled by one or more women who are United States citizens and, if the protest is in connection with an EDWOSB contract, that the concern is not at least 51 percent owned and controlled by one or more women who are economically disadvantaged. SBA will also consider a protest challenging the status of a concern as an EDWOSB or WOSB if the contracting officer has protested because the WOSB or EDWOSB apparent successful offeror has failed to provide all of the required documents, as set forth in § 127.300. In addition, when sufficient credible evidence is presented, SBA will consider a protest challenging whether the prime contractor is unusually reliant on a small, non-similarly situated entity subcontractor, as defined in § 125.1 of this chapter, or a protest alleging that such subcontractor is performing the primary and vital requirements of a set-aside or sole-source WOSB or EDWOSB contract.
( b ) For a protest filed against an EDWOSB or WOSB joint venture, the protest must state all specific grounds for why— ( 1 ) The EDOWSB or WOSB partner to the joint venture did not meet the EDWOSB or WOSB eligibility requirements set forth in § 127.200; and/or
( 2 ) The protested EDWOSB or WOSB joint venture did not meet the requirements set forth in § 127.506.
[75 FR 62282, Oct. 7, 2010, as amended at 84 FR 65251, Nov. 26, 2019; 84 FR 65665, Nov. 29, 2019]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInfrared emission associated with chemical reactions on Shuttle and SIRTF surfacesThe infrared intensities which would be observed by the Shuttle Infrared Telescope Facility (SIRTF), and which are produced by surface chemistry following atmospheric impact on SIRTF and the shuttle are estimated. Three possible sources of reactants are analyzed: (1) direct atmospheric and scattered contaminant fluxes onto the shuttle's surface; (2) direct atmospheric and scattered contaminant fluxes onto the SIRTF sunshade; and (3) scattered fluxes onto the cold SIRTF mirror. The chemical reactions are primarily initiated by the dominent flux of reactive atomic oxygen on the surfaces. Using observations of the optical glow to constrain theoretical parameters, it is estimated for source (1) that the infrared glow on the SIRTF mirror will be comparable to the zodiacal background between 1 and 10 micron wavelengths. It is speculated that oxygen reacts with the atoms and the radicals bound in the organic molecules that reside on the shuttle and the Explorer surfaces. It is concluded that for source (2) that with suitable construction, a warm sunshade will produce insignificant infrared glow. It is noted that the atomic oxygen flux on the cold SIRTF mirror (3) is insufficient to produce significant infrared glow. Infrared absorption by the ice buildup on the mirror is also small.Document ID19840014447Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHollenbach, D. J.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Tielens, Alexander G. G. M.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1984Subject CategorySpace Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberA-9595NASA-TM-85875NAS 1.15:85875Accession Number84N22515Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 188-41-23-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840014447.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024