alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1609. Immunity from attachment and execution of property of a foreign state

Subject to existing international agreements to which the United States is a party at the time of enactment of this Act the property in the United States of a foreign state shall be immune from attachment 1 arrest 1 and execution except as provided in sections 1610 and 1611 of this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 94–583, §4(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2895.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The time of enactment of this Act, referred to in text, probably means the time of enactment of Pub. L. 94–583, which was approved Oct. 21, 1976.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Oct. 21, 1976, see section 8 of Pub. L. 94–583, set out as a note under section 1602 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a comma.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 20-61297-CIV-ALTMAN/Hunt 

BYRON HALL, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LVNV FUNDING, LLC, et al., 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/ 

ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT 

AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES 

 The parties are directed to prepare and file a joint scheduling report, as required by Local 

Rule 16.1, by September 3, 2020. In addition, by September 3, 2020, the parties, including 

governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure 

statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or 

corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, 

conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. 

Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, 

correct, and update the certificates. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida this 24th day of August 2020. 

 ________________________________ 

 ROY K. ALTMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record 

Case 0:20-cv-61297-RKA Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2020 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. §1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Allegro Biodiesel Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, W.
      Bruce Comer III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                W. Bruce Comer IIIW.
                Bruce Comer IIIChief
                Executive OfficerNovember
                13, 2007





A
      signed
      original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 4130.3-3 Modification of permits or leases. ( a ) Following consultation, cooperation, and coordination with the affected lessees or permittees and the state having lands or responsibility for managing resources within the area, the authorized officer may modify terms and conditions of the permit or lease when the active use or related management practices: ( 1 ) Do not meet management objectives specified in: ( i ) The land use plan;
( ii ) The pertinent allotment management plan or other activity plan; or
( iii ) An applicable decision issued under § 4160.3; or
( 2 ) Do not conform to the provisions of subpart 4180 of this part.
( b ) To the extent practical, during the preparation of reports that evaluate monitoring and other data that the authorized officer uses as a basis for making decisions to increase or decrease grazing use, or otherwise to change the terms and conditions of a permit or lease, the authorized officer will provide the following with an opportunity to review and offer input: ( 1 ) Affected permittees or lessees;
( 2 ) States having lands or responsibility for managing resources within the affected area; and
( 3 ) The interested public.
[71 FR 39506, July 12, 2006]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 24, 2012

p0917 

# Order

September 24, 2012

144767

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144767

COA: 300966

Oakland CC: 2010

- 231539

- FH

FREDERICK LEE

- IBARAJ RHIMES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 17, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH , J., would grant leave to appeal to consider the constitutionality of

MCL 768.27b.
Exhibit 32
                                   ----------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of RemoteMDx, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David G. Derrick, Chief Executive
Officer and Michael G. Acton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.


                                          /s/ David G. Derrick
                                          ---------------------
                                          David G. Derrick
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          RemoteMDx, Inc.

                                          /s/ Michael G. Acton
                                          --------------------
                                          Michael G. Acton
                                          Chief Financial Officer



Dated: December 29, 2005
§ 130.800 Oversight of the SBDC Program. ( a ) The AA/SBDC and designees will monitor the SBDC's performance and its ongoing operations under the cooperative agreement to determine if the SBDC is making effective and efficient use of program funds for the benefit of the small business community.
( b ) The District Office is the primary contact for the coordination of the delivery of services to the small businesses in each area of service.
( c ) The AA/SBDC may change the primary contact for coordination at any time and will notify the recipient organization of such a change in a timely manner.
[88 FR 76650, Nov. 7, 2023]
#### § 204.24 Determination on request for a fire management assistance declaration.

The Administrator will review all information submitted in the State's request along with the Principal Advisor's assessment and render a determination. The determination will be based on the conditions of the fire or fire complex existing at the time of the State's request. When possible, the Administrator will evaluate the request and make a determination within several hours. Once the Administrator renders a determination, FEMA will promptly notify the State of the determination.

[75 FR 50715, Aug. 17, 2010]
§ 206.46 Appeals. ( a ) *Denial of declaration request.* When a request for a major disaster declaration or for any emergency declaration is denied, the Governor may appeal the decision. An appeal must be made within 30 days after the date of the letter denying the request. This one-time request for reconsideration, along with appropriate additional information, is submitted to the President through the appropriate Regional Administrator. The processing of this request is similar to the initial request.
( b ) *Denial of types of assistance or areas.* In those instances when the type of assistance or certain areas requested by the Governor are not designated or authorized, the Governor, or the GAR, may appeal the decision. An appeal must be submitted in writing within 30 days of the date of the letter denying the request. This one-time request for reconsideration, along with justification and/or additional information, is sent to the Assistant Administrator for the Disaster Assistance Directoratethrough the appropriate Regional Administrator.
( c ) *Denial of advance of non-Federal share.* In those instances where the Governor's request for an advance is denied, the Governor may appeal the decision. An appeal must be submitted in writing within 30 days of the date of the letter denying the request. This one-time request for reconsideration, along with justification and/or additional information, is sent to the Assistant Administrator for the Disaster Assistance Directoratethrough the appropriate Regional Administrator.
( d ) *Extension of time to appeal.* The 30-day period referred to in paragraphs (a), (b), or (c) of this section may be extended by the Assistant Administrator for the Disaster Assistance Directorate provided that a written request for such an extension, citing reasons for the delay, is made during this 30-day period, and if the Assistant Administrator for the Disaster Assistance Directorate agrees that there is a legitimate basis for extension of the 30-day period. Only the Governor may request a time extension for appeals covered in paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section. The Governor, or the GAR if one has been named, may submit the time extension request for appeals covered in paragraph (b) of this section.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 200 (Monday, October 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3615]


State of Florida; Amendment <greek-i>3

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
October 3, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to 
extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a 
result of this disaster to December 11, 2004.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for economic injury is May 13, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: October 12, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-23274 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
§ 209.6 Project eligibility. ( a ) *Eligible types of project activities.* This grant authority is for projects to acquire floodprone properties and demolish or relocate structures per § 209.10(i), or to elevate floodprone structures. Approved projects must meet the following criteria and comply with all other program requirements described in this rule;
( b ) *Eligibility criteria.* To be eligible, projects must: ( 1 ) Be cost effective. The State will complete an analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the project, in accordance with our guidance and using a methodology that we approve. We will review the State's analysis;
( 2 ) Include only properties that: ( i ) For acquisition, the owner agrees to sell voluntarily;
( ii ) Are within the 100-year floodplain based on best available data or as identified by a FIRM or FEMA-approved Disaster Recovery Map;
( iii ) Were made uninhabitable (as certified by an appropriate State or local official) by the effects of a declared major disaster during federal fiscal years 1999 or 2000;
( iv ) For acquisition, had a pre-event fair market value of less than $300,000 just before the disaster event. Properties submitted for buyout under Pub. L. 106-113 (the original Hurricane Floyd supplemental buyout program) are exempt from this policy, with the limitation that in no case does the Federal share or offer for any such property exceed $225,000; and
( v ) Served as the principal residence for the owner. For multifamily units such as condominium buildings, all units within the structure should be principal residences of the owners and not sublet.
( 3 ) Conform with 44 CFR part 9, Floodplain Management and Protection of Wetlands, and other applicable environmental and historic preservation laws, regulations, Executive Orders, and agency policy.
( c ) For acquisition projects, an owner who is not a United States citizen or qualified alien may receive current fair market value for his or her property. He or she may not receive additional amounts for pre-event fair market value.
( d ) Funds available under Pub. L. 106-113 (the original Floyd supplemental appropriation) are limited to use for acquisition purposes only.
[66 FR 32669, June 15, 2001, as amended at 81 FR 56534, Aug. 22, 2016]
§ 333.82 Applicability of this part and official actions. ( a ) This part and all official actions, unless specifically stated otherwise, apply to transactions in any state, territory, or possession of the United States and the District of Columbia.
( b ) This part and all official actions apply not only to deliveries to other persons but also include deliveries to affiliates and subsidiaries of a person and deliveries from one branch, division, or section of a single entity to another branch, division, or section under common ownership or control.
( c ) This part shall not be construed to affect any administrative actions taken by FEMA, or any outstanding contracts or orders placed pursuant to any of the regulations, orders, schedules, or delegations of authority issued by FEMA prior to May 13, 2020. Such actions, contracts, or orders shall continue in full force and effect under this part unless modified or terminated by proper authority.
#### Westchester Chemical Corporation, Respondent, v. Nikita Strachovsky, Appellant.

No opinion. Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.172 Flood-plain and wetlands management. ( a ) All loans must conform to requirements of Executive Orders 11988, “Flood Plain Management” (3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p. 117) and 11990, “Protection of Wetlands” (3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p. 121). Lenders, Intermediaries, CDCs, and SBA must comply with requirements applicable to them. Applicants must show: ( 1 ) Whether the location for which financial assistance is proposed is in a floodplain or wetland;
( 2 ) If it is in a floodplain, that the assistance is in compliance with local land use plans; and
( 3 ) That any necessary construction or use permits will be issued.
( b ) Generally, there is an 8-step decision making process with respect to: ( 1 ) Construction or acquisition of anything, other than a building;
( 2 ) Repair and restoration equal to more than 50% of the market value of a building; or
( 3 ) Replacement of destroyed structures.
( c ) SBA may determine for the following types of actions, on a case-by-case basis, that the full 8-step process is not warranted and that only the first step (determining if a proposed action is in the base floodplain) need be completed: ( 1 ) Actions located outside the base floodplain;
( 2 ) Repairs, other than to buildings, that are less than 50% of the market value;
( 3 ) Replacement of building contents, materials, and equipment;
( 4 ) Hazard mitigation measures;
( 5 ) Working capital loans; or
( 6 ) SBA loan assistance of $1,500,000 or less.
### §§3011 to 3015. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections, comprising subchapter I of this chapter "State Grant Programs", were omitted in the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 108–364, §2, Oct. 25, 2004, 118 Stat. 1707.

Section 3011, Pub. L. 105–394, title I, §101, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3635, provided for continuity grants for States that received funding for a limited period for technology-related assistance.

Section 3012, Pub. L. 105–394, title I, §102, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3644; Pub. L. 106–402, title IV, §401(b)(4)(B), Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1738, provided for State grants for protection and advocacy related to assistive technology.

Section 3013, Pub. L. 105–394, title I, §103, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3646, related to administrative provisions.

Section 3014, Pub. L. 105–394, title I, §104, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3648, related to a technical assistance program.

Section 3015, Pub. L. 105–394, title I, §105, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3651, authorized appropriations.
#### James C. Bushby v. Lancelot M. Berkeley and Others.

Motion denied. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Opinion filed November 12, 2015

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-13-00352-CV

__________

A 5 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AND ALL IMPROVEMENTS

THEREUPON, BEARING THE ADDRESS: 1483 FRIENDSHIP 

ROAD, WEATHERFORD, PARKER COUNTY, TEXAS 76085, 

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 43rd District Court

Parker County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV12-0976

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a civil forfeiture proceeding brought by the State 

against a five-acre tract of land and all improvements thereupon belonging to Jimmy 

Wayne Mack.1 The trial court found that the five acres and all improvements were 

 

1Under a docket equalization order, the Supreme Court of Texas transferred this appeal from the 

Second Court of Appeals to the Eleventh Court of Appeals. As required under TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3, we 

will decide this case in accordance with the precedent of the Second Court of Appeals.
2

contraband under Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure2and ordered 

that they be forfeited. See CRIM. PROC. art. 59.02. In one point of error, Appellant 

appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the forfeiture proceedings.

We affirm.3

Appellant argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss

because the State did not commence the forfeiture proceedings within the applicable

statute of limitations. However, the State contends that Appellant waived the 

defense because he did not affirmatively plead the defense of limitations. We agree 

with the State. The statute of limitations is an affirmative defense, and to preserve 

error on appeal, Appellant must have affirmatively pleaded the defense. TEX. R.

CIV. P. 94; Woods v. William M. Mercer, Inc., 769 S.W.2d 515, 517 (Tex. 1988). 

Appellant failed to plead an affirmative defense in his original answer, and no 

amended or supplemental pleadings were filed. Therefore, we hold that Appellant 

waived the defense of limitations. We overrule Appellant’s sole point of error.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

JIM R. WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE

November 12, 2015

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.

 

2TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. ch. 59 (West 2006 & Supp. 2014).

3On this same day in companion cases, 1998 Black Mitsubishi 3000 GT, Texas LP #811PKJ, VIN

JA3AM44H9WY001446, et al. v. State, No. 11-13-00350-CV, and 2000 Black Ford F-150, Texas License 

Plate 21LKN5, VIN: 1FTRX18L6YKA80489, et al. v. State, No. 11-13-00353-CV, we have affirmed the 

judgments in which Appellant was ordered to forfeit personal property to the State in trial court cause 

nos. CV12-0542 and CV12-0538.
### §2503. Technical assistance

#### (a) In general

With funds appropriated to carry out this section, the Secretary shall make grants to community-based organizations to provide technical assistance to employers and labor unions selected under subsection (b). Such technical assistance may include—

(1) developing outreach and orientation sessions to recruit women into the employers' apprenticeable occupations and nontraditional occupations;

(2) developing preapprenticeable occupations or nontraditional skills training to prepare women for apprenticeable occupations or nontraditional occupations;

(3) providing ongoing orientations for employers, unions, and workers on creating a successful environment for women in apprenticeable occupations or nontraditional occupations;

(4) setting up support groups and facilitating networks for women in nontraditional occupations on or off the job site to improve their retention;

(5) setting up a local computerized data base referral system to maintain a current list of tradeswomen who are available for work;

(6) serving as a liaison between tradeswomen and employers and tradeswomen and labor unions to address workplace issues related to gender; and

(7) conducting exit interviews with tradeswomen to evaluate their on-the-job experience and to assess the effectiveness of the program.

#### (b) Selection of employer and labor unions

The Secretary shall select a total of 50 employers or labor unions to receive technical assistance provided with grants made under subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 102–530, §4, Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3466.)