alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
     UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 INCLUDED
     IN THE AMENDED QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB/A FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         7,559,577
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    362,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                      33,253
<INVENTORY>                                        1,982
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,983,356
<PP&E>                                         1,133,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                   236,525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,257,538
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,684,849
<BONDS>                                        1,053,287
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                          185
<COMMON>                                           2,857
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,516,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,257,538
<SALES>                                           66,121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,192,128
<CGS>                                             45,216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    827,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,108,266
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  23,821
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               933,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (4,676,915)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (4,676,915)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (4,676,915)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (1.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (1.39)



</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.310 Discovery.

Discovery will not be permitted in appeals from size determinations or NAICS code designations.

[61 FR 2683, Jan. 29, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 47250, July 18, 2002]
##### 



Exhibit 15.1 [Ernst & Young Letterhead] August 4, 2004 The Trustee
Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3, No. 333-70394-01) of the Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust for
the registration of 3,568,791 trust units of beneficial interest, of our report
dated August 4, 2004 relating to the unaudited condensed interim financial
statements of the Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust that are included in its
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. Very truly yours,/s/ Ernst & Young LLP Page 22
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.219 Sanctions. ( a ) A Judge may impose appropriate sanctions, except for fees, costs, or monetary penalties, which he or she deems necessary to serve the ends of justice, if a party or its attorney: ( 1 ) Fails to comply with an order of the Judge;
( 2 ) Fails to comply with the rules set forth in this part;
( 3 ) Acts in bad faith or for purposes of delay or harassment;
( 4 ) Submits false statements knowingly, recklessly, or with deliberate disregard for the truth; or
( 5 ) Otherwise acts in an unethical or disruptive manner.
( b ) Appropriate sanctions may include: ( 1 ) Ordering a pleading or evidentiary filing to be struck from the record;
( 2 ) Dismissing an appeal with prejudice;
( 3 ) Suspending counsel from practice before OHA;
( 4 ) Filing a complaint with the applicable State bar; and
( 5 ) Taking any other action that is appropriate to further the administration of justice.
[75 FR 47441, Aug. 6, 2010]
Exhibit
32.1




Ener1,
Inc.


1540
Broadway, Suite 25C


New York,
New York 10036




November
9, 2009





Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, NE


Washington,
DC 20549





Re:
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350





Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ener1, Inc.,
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, I, Charles Gassenheimer, Chief Executive Officer of Ener1,
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





2)
            the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ener1,
      Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Ener1, Inc.





/s/
      Charles GassenheimerCharles
      Gassenheimer
                    Chief
      Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
                    (Principal
      Executive Officer and
                    Duly
      Authorized
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





This
certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to Ener1, Inc.’s
quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
filing.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-96-61 October 2, 1996

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

BYRON NUCLEAR PLANT RATED "SUPERIOR" IN TWO AREAS, "GOOD"

IN TWO AREAS IN NRC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

The Byron Nuclear Power Station, operated by Commonwealth

Edison Co., has received performance ratings of "superior" in

maintenance and engineering and "good" in operations and plant

support in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff's latest

Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) report for

the facility.

The assessment covers the period August 21, 1994, through

August 17 of this year.

The NRC staff and Commonwealth Edison officials will discuss

the evaluation during a meeting set for 10 a.m. on October 8 at

the Training Building at the Byron plant site. The meeting will

be open for public observation. NRC officials will be available

afterwards to speak with reporters, state and local officials,

and members of the public.

NRC SALP reports rate utilities in four functional areas --

plant operations, maintenance, engineering, and plant support --

and assign ratings of Category 1, 2, or 3 depending on whether

their performance in those areas was superior, good or

acceptable. The report on Byron gives the plant a "Category 1"

rating in maintenance and engineering, indicating superior

performance. It assigns a rating of "Category 2" to operations

and plant support, indicating good performance.

NRC Regional Administrator A. Bill Beach, in a letter to the

utility, said: "Conduct of nuclear activities at Byron, while

excellent overall, declined in operations and plant support when

compared to the last SALP period."

He continued, "The decline was due to the continuation of

operator errors, examples of a less conservative safety focus and

evaluation of risk considerations in planned activities, and

significant weaknesses in the chemistry program."

"Byron's overall performance was characterized by excellent

communications and by active teamwork to solve plant problems,"

Mr. Beach said. "Material condition was, with few exceptions,

excellent; equipment was reliable and available; work planning
was thorough, systematic, and effective. Engineering provided

excellent support for extensive steam generator inspections and

aggressive followup on generic issues."

The ratings for each functional area of this report and the

previous report were:

Functional Area Current Period Previous Period

Operations 2 1

Maintenance 1 1

Engineering 1 1

Plant Support 2 1

####

The full SALP report is available on the NRC's internet web site

at: <http://www.nrc.gov/OPA>. SALP reports for all nuclear

plants are also available as they are issued through an

electronic mailing list. To receive these reports send an e-mail

message to listproc@nrc.gov with no subject and with the

following message: subscribe salp yourfirstname yourlastname.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-98-37 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Wednesday, May 13, 1998)

NRC INSPECTION TEAM AT CATAWBA

TO BRIEF DUKE ENERGY OFFICIALS ON FRIDAY

Meeting Will Be Open To Observation By The Public

A team of Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspectors, dispatched to Duke Energy’s

Catawba nuclear power plant near Rock Hill, S.C. last Monday to review circumstances

associated with a May 7 event, will brief company officials on their preliminary findings

at 11:00 a.m. (EDT) on Friday, May 15 at the plant site. The briefing will be open to

observation by the public and the press, and NRC officials will be available at its

conclusion to answer observers’ questions.

NRC officials said no accident occurred. However, agency inspectors formed an

Augmented Inspection Team to inspect and review circumstances associated with the

event. The NRC’s interest is in learning how a failure in the unit’s non safety-related

secondary condensate system resulted in operators declaring inoperable all trains of

the safety-related auxiliary feedwater system.

The meeting will be held at the Catawba site in Room 153 of the plant administration

building.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Allen W. Evarts and Others v. Municipal Court, etc., and Others.

Motion granted. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
No: 23-044 July 24, 2023

CONTACT: Office of Public Affairs, 301-415-8200

NRC Names Thomas G. Ashley Jr. Director of Office of Investigations

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has named Thomas G. 

Ashley Jr. as Director of the Office of Investigations, effective July 30, 

2023. Ashley has been acting in the position since the retirement in 

February of the previous director, Tracy Higgs. 

The Office of Investigations develops policy, procedures and 

standards for conducting NRC investigations of alleged wrongdoing by 

licensees and other entities. The office conducts and supervises 

investigations within the scope of NRC authority except those of NRC 

employees and contractors. The office also maintains liaison with other 

agencies and organizations to ensure the timely exchange of information 

and makes appropriate referrals to the Department of Justice for 

prosecution of criminal violations.

“Tom brings an impressive body of work to this appointment with his significant 

leadership in highly technical and sensitive positions in the Department of Defense and the U.S. 

Navy,” said NRC Executive Director for Operations Daniel H. Dorman. “His leadership has 

proven invaluable while he was in an acting capacity, and I am pleased he has been selected for 

this important position.”

Ashley joined the NRC in March 2020 as director of the Information Technology 

Services Development and Operations Division in the Office of the Chief Information 

Officer. Prior to joining the NRC, Thomas was director of IT Transformation at the Defense 

Counterintelligence and Security Agency. Previously, he served as deputy assistant director for 

information technology at the Naval Criminal Investigative Service. In that role he led a team of 

roughly 120 federal civilian, uniformed military, and contractor personnel, servicing 160 

locations around the globe.

Ashley started his civilian federal service in 2009 at the Defense Security Service, where 

he served as the IT lead for the Defense Security Service Defense Industrial Security Clearance 

Office in Columbus, Ohio, overseeing daily operations from an IT/communications perspective. 

His federal career began in the U.S. Navy, where he served 12 years providing afloat and 

land base telecommunications, satellite communications, and information technology support. 
Page | 2

He is the recipient of a Joint Service Commendation medal, a Navy/Marine Corps 

Commendation medal, four Navy/Marine Corps Achievement medals, and three Flag Letters of 

Commendation.

Ashley holds a bachelor’s degree in cybersecurity from The George Washington 

University and is a graduate of the Naval Senior Leadership Academy (Naval Postgraduate 

School) and the NRC Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Program.
### §1300a–4. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–461, §6, Oct. 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 769, which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### Ralph Mernit, Inc., Appellant, v. Harry J. Scheer, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Van Voorhis, J., concurs in the result on the ground that the action is, in truth, for equitable relief, and that if plaintiff is successful it will result in an interlocutory judgment for an accounting. On the accounting the referee can take the necessary testimony without the aid of a previous examination before trial. Settle order on notice.
社會安全局及聯邦醫療保險與醫療補助服務中

心Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services共

同為您提供處方藥費用的附加補助。要確定是否能

夠符合這項附加補助的條件,社會安全局需要知道

您的收入以及存款、投資與房地產(您所居住的房

地產除外)的價值。符合以下條件即有資格獲得附

加補助:

‧ 有限的收入(個人收入低於 $14,700,已婚並同

居的夫妻收入低於 $19,800)。即使年收入較

高,仍然有可能獲得對於每月的保險費、年度自

付扣除額和處方藥自付額的補助。收入較高的情

況包括您或配偶:

— 在贍養同住的其他家庭成員;

— 有工作收入;或

— 住在阿拉斯加或夏威夷;以及

‧ 有限的財產(個人財產低於 $10,000,已婚並同

居的夫妻財產低於 $20,000)。如果將某些資金

用於喪葬費用,這些財產的限額還可略微提高

(每人另加 $1,500)。

須知事項

確定自己擁有的、與配偶或其他人共有的財產,

但不要包括自己居住的房屋 要 、汽車、墓地或私人

財產。

查看自己的所有收入。

事先收集自己的紀錄以節省時間。

要記住,這份計算表並非申請表,只是一份協助 非

您填寫附加補助申請表的計算表。

為完成對聯邦醫療保險Medicare

處方藥計劃費用的補助之申請須知

能夠幫助事先做好準備的文件包括: 夠幫助事先做好準備的文件包括:

‧ 證明您在銀行、信用社或其他金融機關的帳

戶餘款的結帳單;

‧ 投資結帳單;

‧ 壽險保單;

‧ 股票憑證;

‧ 納稅表;

‧ 年金或退休金授與信;以及

‧ 薪資存根。

與社會安全局聯絡 社會安全局聯絡

如需要申請表,請致電 1-800-772-1213

(文字電話TTY 1-800-325-0778) 與社會安全局

聯絡,索取聯邦醫療保險Medicare處方藥計劃費

用補助申請表(SSA-1020)(Application for Help 

with Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Costs 

[SSA-1020])。也可以在網站上 

www.socialsecurity.gov 申請。

如洽詢聯邦醫療保險Medicare處方藥計劃

的資訊,請致電1-800-MEDICARE

(1-800-633-4227) 或上網 www.medicare.gov。

請繼續到下頁完成計算表 繼續到下頁完成計算表

(續下頁)

為完成對聯邦醫療保險 Medicare

處方藥計劃費用的補助之申請須知

www.socialsecurity.gov

2006
我們需要知道有關您與配偶(如已婚並共同居住)的收入和財產的資料。

姓名 社會安全號碼

___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________

財產 其價值

銀行帳戶、包括支票、儲蓄和定存單 $___________________________________________________________

股票、債券、儲蓄債券、共同基金、個人退休帳戶 (IRAs) 或

其他投資 $___________________________________________________________

在家中或任何地方的現金 $___________________________________________________________

您與配偶(如已婚並共同居住)的壽險保單 $___________________________________________________________

注意:社會安全局需要知道 意: 您的壽險保單在今天兌現會得到的金額 的壽險保單在今天兌現 。請與您的保險公司或經紀人聯絡以得到確切的現金價值。

這筆金額可能低於您的投保金額。

自己居住的房屋以外的其他房地產 $___________________________________________________________

收入 每月金額

社會安全福利金 $___________________________________________________________

鐵路退休金 $___________________________________________________________

退役軍人津貼 $___________________________________________________________

其他退休金或年金 $___________________________________________________________

贍養費 $___________________________________________________________

房租淨收入 $___________________________________________________________

勞工傷殘補償 $___________________________________________________________

由他人支助的家庭開銷,例如食物、房屋貸款或房租、取暖燃

料或瓦斯、電力、水和財產稅 $___________________________________________________________

薪資 $___________________________________________________________

自營者淨收入 $___________________________________________________________

其他收入 $___________________________________________________________

您可以選擇代理人協助辦理社會安全局的事務。我們會像與您合作一樣,與您的代表人合作。

www.socialsecurity.gov

Social Security Administration

SSA Publication No. 05-10128-CH

What You Need To Complete The Application For Help With

 Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Costs (Chinese)

March 2006
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

OWEN ARVIE THOMPSON, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 22-0156 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR1997-012793

The Honorable Kathleen H. Mead, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Krista Wood

Counsel for Respondent

Owen Arvie Thompson, Florence 

Petitioner

FILED 11-22-2022
STATE v. THOMPSON

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Jennifer M. Perkins, Judge James B. Morse Jr., and Judge 

Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Owen Arvie Thompson seeks review of the 

superior court's order dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief, filed 

pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's 

third petition after being retried but his fourth in the case overall.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 

2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief and amended 

petition for review. Petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.

¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review but deny relief.
###### Editorial Note on Part 124

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 124 appear at 72 FR 50040, Aug. 30, 2007, and 76 FR 8253, Feb. 11, 2011.

#### § 124.701 What is the purpose of the 7(j) management and technical assistance program?

Section 7(j)(1) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 636(j)(1), authorizes SBA to enter into grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts with public or private organizations to pay all or part of the cost of technical or management assistance for individuals or concerns eligible for assistance under sections 7(a)(11), 7(j)(10), or 8(a) of the Small Business Act.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 27]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ027.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 370]]

Public Law 109-27
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
151 West End Street in Goliad, Texas, as the ``Judge Emilio Vargas Post 
       Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 12, 2005 -  [H.R. 1072]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 151 West 
End Street in Goliad, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 
``Judge Emilio Vargas Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Judge Emilio Vargas Post 
Office Building''.

    Approved July 12, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1072:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Apr. 20, considered and passed House.
            June 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
### [§1022. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–312, title III, §301(a), Dec. 17, 2010, 124 Stat. 3300]

Section, added Pub. L. 107–16, title V, §542(a), June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 76, related to treatment of property acquired from a decedent dying after Dec. 31, 2009.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1022, added Pub. L. 88–272, title II, §225(j)(1), Feb. 26, 1964, 78 Stat. 92, dealt with the increase in basis with respect to certain foreign personal holding company stock or securities, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(a)(126), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1784, applicable with respect to stock or securities acquired from a decedent dying after Oct. 4, 1976.

Another prior section 1022, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 302, relating to cross references, was renumbered section 1023.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal of section applicable to estates of decedents dying, and transfers made after Dec. 31, 2009, except as otherwise provided, see section 301(e) of Pub. L. 111–312, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2010 Amendment note under section 121 of this title.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00134-CR

Kenneth Anthony Hopple, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 9686, HONORABLE H. R. TOWSLEE, JUDGE PRESIDING

Kenneth Anthony Hopple pleaded guilty to two counts of indecency with a child by

contact. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 21.11 (West Supp. 2002). On July 12, 2001, the district court

sentenced him to fifteen years’ imprisonment. The time for perfecting appeal expired on August 13,

2001. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).

On December 18, 2001, Hopple filed a pro se motion for out-of-time appeal. Under

the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than

by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App.

1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). The proper procedure for

obtaining an out-of-time appeal is a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim.

Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2002). 
2

The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

Lee Yeakel, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel 

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: March 21, 2002

Do Not Publish