1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Audley Brown, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

 ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-22434

Florida Power & Light Company, )

Briggs & Stratton Corporation, )

Generac Power Systems, Inc. )

)

Defendants. )

________________________________ )

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

The Plaintiff, Audley Brown (hereinafter, “Mr. Brown” or “Plaintiff”), by and 

through his undersigned legal counsel, makes this Complaint against the Defendants,

Florida Power & Light Company (“FPL”), Briggs & Stratton Corporation (“Briggs & 

Stratton”), and Generac Power Systems, Inc. (“Generac”) (hereinafter, collectively, the 

“Defendants”), and alleges the following:

NATURE OF THE ACTION

1. Plaintiff seeks damages to compensate him for acts of patent infringement 

engaged in by the Defendants in violation of the laws of the United States.

Case 1:20-cv-22434-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2020 Page 1 of 9
2

THE PARTIES

2. Plaintiff is an individual who resides at 767 NW 64th St., Miami, Florida

33150.

3. On information and belief, Defendant FPL is a corporation organized and 

existing under the laws of the State of Florida, and has a principal place of business at 70 

Universe Blvd., Juno Beach, FL 33408.

4. On information and belief, Defendant Briggs & Stratton is a Wisconsin 

corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Wisconsin, and has a 

principal place of business at 3300 N. 124th St., Milwaukee, WI 53222.

5. On information and belief, Defendant Generac is a Wisconsin corporation 

organized and existing under the laws of the State of Wisconsin, and has a principal place 

of business at S45 W29290 WI-59, Waukesha, WI 53189.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

6. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a), and 1367(a).

7. This Court may exercise personal jurisdiction over Defendants based upon 

their contacts with this forum, and placing their infringing products into the stream of 

commerce, with the knowledge or understanding that such products are sold in the State

of Florida, including in this District. The acts by Defendants have caused injury to 

Plaintiff within this District. Upon information and belief, Defendants derive substantial 

Case 1:20-cv-22434-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2020 Page 2 of 9
3

revenue from the sales of infringing products within this District, expect their actions to 

have consequences within this District, and derive substantial revenue from interstate and 

international commerce. 

8. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), 

(c), and 1400 (b) because Defendants regularly do business, have committed acts of 

infringement, and are subject to personal jurisdiction here.

BACKGROUND

9. Mr. Brown is the owner of all right, title, and interest in, and the named 

inventor of, United States Patent No. 5,998,961 (hereafter, “the ’961 Patent”), entitled 

“PORTABLE BATTERY CHARGER.” (See enclosed Ex. A.) The ’961 Patent expired 

on February 4, 2020.

10. The ’961 Patent was duly and legally issued to Mr. Brown.

11. The ’961 Patent discloses a new portable battery charger for jump-starting 

an engine of a disabled vehicle.

12. The ’961 Patent claims a main housing having a motor and a generator 

disposed therein. The main housing includes gasoline and oil intake portions in 

communication with the motor. A pair of cables extends outwardly from one of the side 

walls of the main housing. The pair of cables is in communication with the generator. 

The pair of cables each has a spring-loaded clip disposed on free ends thereof for 

operative coupling with positive and negative terminals of a battery. Id.

Case 1:20-cv-22434-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2020 Page 3 of 9
4

13. On information and belief, Defendants also do business in manufacturing 

and/or distributing and/or selling of portable battery chargers. 

14. On information and belief, and without Plaintiff’s authorization, 

Defendants have made, used, offered to sell, sold, and/or imported into the United States 

products having the assembly and components claimed in the ’961 Patent.

15. On information and belief, Defendant Briggs & Stratton’s infringing 

portable battery chargers include a portable battery charger identified, at least, as “Briggs 

& Stratton 6250 Watt Portable Generator”. 

16. On information and belief, Defendant Generac’s infringing portable 

battery chargers include a portable battery charger identified, as least, as “Generac Gas 

Power Charger”. 

17. On information and belief, Defendant FPL sold and/or offered to sell both 

the “Briggs & Stratton 6250 Watt Portable Generator” and the “Generac Gas Power 

Charger.”

18. Without a license, consent, or authorization from Mr. Brown, Defendants

sold and/or offered for sale, manufactured, used, or imported into the United States a 

plurality of the “Briggs & Stratton 6250 Watt Portable Generator” and “Generac Gas 

Power Charger” products.

19. Rather than innovate and develop their own technology and a unique 

PORTABLE BATTERY CHARGER, Defendants chose to copy Mr. Brown’s technology

and innovative style in its infringing products.

Case 1:20-cv-22434-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2020 Page 4 of 9
5

20. On information and belief, Defendant Briggs & Stratton’s “Briggs & 

Stratton 6250 Watt Portable Generator” contains elements defined with respect to the 

claims of the ’961 Patent.

21. On information and belief, Defendant Briggs & Stratton intentionally 

manufactured and/or sold, or offered for sale, or imported into the United States the 

“Briggs & Stratton 6250 Watt Portable Generator” knowing of the existence of the ’961

Patent, including in Miami-Dade County.

22. On information and belief, Defendant Briggs & Stratton continues to use, 

offer to sell, sell, and/or import into the United States the “Briggs & Stratton 6250 Watt 

Portable Generator” knowing of the existence of the ’961 Patent.

23. On information and belief, Defendant Generac’s “Generac Gas Power 

Charger” contains elements defined with respect to the claims of the ’961 Patent. 

24. On information and belief, Defendant Generac intentionally manufactured 

and/or sold, or offered for sale, or imported into the United States, the “Generac Gas 

Power Charger” knowing of the existence of the ’961 Patent, including in Miami-Dade 

County.

25. On information and belief, Defendant continues to use, manufacture, offer 

to sell, sell, and/or import into the United States the “Generac Gas Power Charger” 

knowing of the existence of the ‘961 Patent.

Case 1:20-cv-22434-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2020 Page 5 of 9
6

26. On information and belief, Defendant FPL intentionally sold or offered for 

sale the “Briggs & Stratton 6250 Watt Portable Generator” and the “Generac Gas Power 

Charger,” knowing of the existence of the ’961 Patent, including in Miami-Dade County.

27. On information and belief, Defendant FPL continues to sell or offer to sell 

the “Briggs & Stratton 6250 Watt Portable Generator” and the “Generac Gas Power 

Charger,” knowing of the existence of the ’961 Patent. 

28. Defendants’ knowing and repeated infringement of the Plaintiff’s ’961

Patent was intentional and willful.

29. Defendants, upon being notified of their infringing product, knowingly 

continued to sell Plaintiff’s patented PORTABLE BATTERY CHARGER.

COUNT I: PATENT INFRINGEMENT

30. Plaintiff re-alleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 

through 29 above, inclusive, and incorporates them by reference herein.

31. Defendant Briggs & Stratton has made, used, offered to sell, sold, and/or 

imported into the United States the “Briggs & Stratton 6250 Watt Portable Generator”

knowing of the existence of the ’961 Patent without Plaintiff’s authorization.

32. Defendant Generac has made, used, offered to sell, sold, and/or imported 

into the United States the “Generac Gas Power Charger” knowing of the existence of the 

’961 Patent without Plaintiff’s authorization.

Case 1:20-cv-22434-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2020 Page 6 of 9
7

33. Defendant FPL sold or offered to sell the “Briggs & Stratton 6250 Watt 

Portable Generator” and “Generac Gas Power Charger” knowing of the existence of the 

’961 Patent without Plaintiff’s authorization.

34. Defendants, directly, contributorily and by inducement, infringed at least 

one claim of the ’961 Patent, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents. 

Defendants violated 35 U.S.C. § 271 by having sold, offered to sell, make or use the 

patented invention in the United States, by actively having induced others to sell, offer to 

sell, make or use the patented invention in the United States, and by offering to sell or 

selling within the United States components of a patented machine, manufacture, 

combination or composition, or a material or apparatus for use in practicing a patented 

process, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the same to be especially 

made or especially adapted for use in an infringement of such patent, and not a staple 

article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.

35. Defendants’ infringement was intentional and willful, making this an 

exceptional case.

36. Plaintiff has been and will continue to be irreparably harmed by 

Defendants’ infringement of his ’961 Patent.

37. Defendants’ infringing activities violate 35 U.S.C. § 271.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Audley Brown respectfully prays for:

Case 1:20-cv-22434-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2020 Page 7 of 9
8

A. Judgment that Defendants willfully infringed the ’961 Patent in violation 

of 35 U.S.C. § 271;

B. An award of damages adequate to compensate him for the patent 

infringements that have occurred, including pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, which shall be 

trebled as a result of Defendants’ willful patent infringement, including all pre-judgment 

and post-judgment interest at the maximum rate permitted by law, and costs;

C. Actual damages suffered by him as a result of Defendants’ unlawful 

conduct, in an amount to be proven at trial, as well as prejudgment interest as authorized 

by law;

D. Awarding him additional remedy, permitted by 35 U.S.C. § 289, including 

but not limited to, Defendants’ profits on its products found to infringe the ’961 Patent;

E. An assessment of costs, including reasonable attorney fees, pursuant to 35 

U.S.C. § 285, with prejudgment interests; 

F. Restitutionary relief against Defendants and in favor of Plaintiff, including 

disgorgement of wrongfully obtained profits and any other appropriate relief; and

G. Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 38, BROWN demands a jury trial on all issues raised 

in this Complaint triable to a jury.

Case 1:20-cv-22434-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2020 Page 8 of 9
9

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Albert Bordas

Albert Bordas, Esq.

ALBERT BORDAS, P.A.

5975 Sunset Drive, Suite 705

Miami, Florida 33143

(305) 669-9848 (Tel.)

(305) 669-9851 (Fax)

albert@bordasiplaw.com

FL Bar No. 330220

/s/ Manotti L. Jenkins

Manotti L. Jenkins, Esq.

LAW OFFICES OF MANOTTI L. JENKINS, 

LTD.

150 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 2800

Chicago, Illinois 60601

(312) 208-9537 (Tel.)

(872) 228-8153 (Fax.)

MJ@mljlawoffices.com

Pro Hac Vice Pending

Case 1:20-cv-22434-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2020 Page 9 of 9