alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Gina McCm-thy PHONE: 860-424-3001 

Commissioner September 18, 2009 

Ira Leighton, Acting Regional Administrator 

U.S . Environmental Protection Agency 

EPA New England Regional Office 

One Congress Street, Suite I 100 (Mail Code CAQ) 

Boston, MA 02114-2023 

Re: Adequacy Determination of the Connecticut State Implementation Plan with Regard to 

Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(1) and (2)jor the 

2006 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

Dear Administrator Leighton: 

Pursuant to Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 110(a)(1) and (2), all states are required to submit plans 

to implement, maintain and enforce the 2006 fine particulate matter (PM2,5 ) national ambient air quality 

standard (NAAQS), including such basic requirements as emissions inventories, monitoring and modeling 

to assure attainment and maintenance of the standards. On October 2, 2007, the U.S Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) issued guidance on compliance with the non-transport-related or infrastructure 

requirements of CAA Section 110(a)(2) with regard to the 1997 PMz.5 and ozone NAAQS. 1 

As set out in Table 1 below, Connecticut's State Implementation Plan, as identified in 40 CFR 52, 

subpart H and as supplemented by the 1997 PMZ,-, NAAQS attainment demonstration a submitted to EPA 

on November 18, 2008, satisfies the fourteen required CAA Section I 10(a)(1) and (2) infrastructure 

requirements for the 2006 PM?,5 NAAQS. 

We look forward to working with EPA as a critical partner in our continuing mission to conserve, 

improve and protect the environment and public health for the citizens of Connecticut. If you require 

additional information or have any questions about this submission, please contact Anne R. Gobin, Chief, 

Bureau of Air Management at 860-424-3026 . 

Yours truly, 

Amey W. Marrella 

Commissioner 

cc : Anne Arnold, EPA Region 1 

David Conroy, EPA Region I 

Anne R. Gobin, CTDEP 

t The fourteen required infrastructure elements of CAA Section t 10(a)(2) are described in an October 2, 

2007 guidance memo from William Harnett, Director of EPA's Air Quality Policy Division . 

The document is available at : 

http://www .et .QovLdep/cwp/view.asp?a=2684&Q=419074&depNav GID=1619 . 

STATE OF CONNECTICUT 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONAIENTAL PROTECTION 

79 ELM STREET HARTFORD, CT 06106-5127 

(Printed on RecyclLd Paper) 

www.ct.a+ovldep 

An Equal oWlx>rteurity Gmplover
§ 333.30 Policy. ( a ) Allocation orders will: ( 1 ) Be used only when there is insufficient supply of a material, service, or facility to satisfy national defense requirements through the use of the priorities authority or when the use of the priorities authority would cause a severe and prolonged disruption in the supply of materials, services, or facilities available to support normal U.S. economic activities; and
( 2 ) Not be used to ration materials or services at the retail level.
( b ) Allocation orders, when used, will be distributed equitably among the suppliers of the materials, services, or facilities being allocated and not require any person to relinquish a disproportionate share of the civilian market.
( c ) When a hazard has occurred or is imminent, an allocation order may be used without regard to paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section whenever it is deemed by the Administrator to be necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2319]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of a Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act

    Under 28 C.F.R. 50.7, notice is hereby given that on January 22, 
2004, a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Wal-Mart Stores, 
Inc, Sam's West, Inc. and Sam's East, Inc., Civil Action No. 04-0086-
CV-SOW was lodged with the United States District Court for the Western 
District of Missouri.
    The complaint alleges twenty instances where Sam's Club violated 
the regulations promulgated under sections 608 and 609 of the Clean Air 
Act by selling class I or class II refrigerant to people who are not 
certified technicians to maintain, service, repair, or dispose of 
appliances that use refrigerant. The Consent Decree settles these 
claims in exchange for payment of a civil penalty of $400,000 in 
addition to injunctive relief under which Sam's Club and Wal-Mart have 
agreed to cease all sales of refrigerants containing class I and class 
II substances.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent 
Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, 
Environment and National Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to 
U.S. v. Wal-Mart, Inc. et al. Consent Decree, D.J. Ref. 90-5-2-1-06456.
    The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United 
States Attorney, Western District of Missouri Charles Evans Whittaker 
Courthouse, 400 East 9th Street, Fifth Floor Kansas City, Missouri 
64106, Telephone: (816) 426-3122 and at U.S. EPA Region VII, 901 N. 5th 
Street, Kansas City, KS 66101, (913) 551-7471. During the public 
comment period, the Consent Decree may also be examined on the 
following Department of Justice web site, http:/www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail 
from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 
Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a request 
to Tonia Fleetwood (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bdc9d2d3d4dc93dbd1d8d8c9cad2d2d9fdc8ced9d2d793dad2cb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="10647f7e79713e767c757564677f7f74506563747f7a3e777f66">[email protected]</span></a>), fax no. (202) 514-0097, 
phone confirmation number (202) 514-1547. In requesting a copy from the 
Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $6 (25 
cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury.

Robert Maher,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 04-2319 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Mary A. Gubbins and Clayton Cunningham, Appellees, v. Philip O’Mahony, Individually and Executor, et al., Appellants.

Gen. No. 17,476.

Appeals and *ebrobs—where parties have settled differences.*An appeal from a decree ordering an executor to sell certain real estate will be dismissed where it appears that the property was sold subsequent to the decree for a price acceptable to all concerned, the proceeds distributed and the executor discharged.

*57Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Jesse A. Baldwin, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1911.

Appeal dismissed.

Opinion filed December 19, 1912.

Rehearing denied January 2, 1913.

William Ritchie, for appellants.

No appearance for appellees.

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellee, Mary A. G-ubbins, was one of a number of beneficiaries named in the will of Timothy O’Mahony, in which Philip O’Mahony was made executor. She filed her bill in chancery seeking a decree ordering Philip O’Mahony to sell real property of the estate and to distribute the proceeds under the terms of the will. Other relief was also prayed for. It was contended by the defendants to the bill that the matter of a sale of real property was, under the will, solely within the discretion of the executor. Upon hearing the chancellor decreed the sale of the real property. From that decree appellants appealed to this court. Appellees did not enter their appearance here. Such in brief outline is the record before us.

It has been brought to the attention of this court by the attorneys in the case that subsequent to the entry of the decree Philip O’Mahony, executor, sold the property in question, for a price which was acceptable to all concerned; that the proceeds of the sale have been distributed to the beneficiaries, under the will, and that the executor has been discharged. The subject-matter of the litigation having been thus terminated to the apparent satisfaction of the parties, there is nothing for this court to pass upon. This court will not pass upon moot questions where parties have settled their differences. Aff v. Hopkins, 57 Ill. App. 529; American Bldg., Loan & Invest. Society v. People, 60 Ill. App. 332; Ebert v. Beedy, 113 Ill. 316. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

*Appeal dismissed.*
Document

[NAME]






MARCH 15, 2021
RESTRICTED UNITS 
AWARD LETTER


Protective Life Corporation has awarded you:
______ Restricted Units
Date of Grant: March 15, 2021


These Restricted Units were awarded pursuant to the Protective Life Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), and are subject to the terms and conditions contained in the 2021 Restricted Units Award Provisions (“Provisions”), as set forth in Appendix A to this Award Letter, and the Plan. The Plan and the Provisions contain terms and conditions regarding the vesting of these Restricted Units, termination of employment, tax withholding, non-solicitation of Company employees and customers, regulatory compliance, and other matters, and I encourage you to read the Provisions carefully.


Please retain these documents in your personal records.






/s/ RICHARD J. BIELEN


Richard J. Bielen
President and Chief Executive Officer of
Protective Life Corporation
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Shore Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven M. Belote, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: March 20, 2007

 

This certificate accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and will not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

 

83
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-61415-CIV-SMITH

LAUREN RAND,

Plaintiff,

v. 

RICHARD C. MAURAN and 

CHRISTINA MICEVIC,

Defendants.

___________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On September 21, 2020, Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle submitted a Report 

and Recommendation to the District Judge [DE 11]. Subsequently, the Court

ordered the parties to inform the Court, no later than September 24, 2020, if they

intend to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. (See DE 12.) None of 

the parties filed such a notice. Therefore, upon consideration, it is 

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [DE 11] is AFFIRMED 

AND ADOPTED:

1. The parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement and 

for Dismissal with Prejudice [DE 7] is GRANTED;

2. The parties’ Settlement Agreement is APPROVED;

Case 0:20-cv-61415-RS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

3. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to 

bear its own fees and costs except as otherwise set forth in the Settlement 

Agreement; and

4. The Court retains jurisdiction until November 30, 2020 to enforce the 

Settlement Agreement. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 28th day of 

September, 2020.

cc: counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-61415-RS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2020 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2
 
 CONTROL CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Richard K Brock, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PLM Equipment Growth & Income Fund VII.
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is prepared;
 
 b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and
 
 c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and board of Managers:
 
 a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 
 6.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 
 
 
 Date: May 14, 2004  By:  /s/ Richard K Brock
 Richard K Brock
 Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer)
02/08/201 0 09:1 9 FAI 3107256816 AWP-7 11002 

OcPTOFm^ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF EIEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, B.C. 

pRIAIiON 

Federal Aviation Administration, * 

Complainant, 

Sun Quest Executive Charter, Inc., 

Respondent. 

* 

* 

* 

* 

Ik 

Docket No. CP08WP0004 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Attn: Appellate Docket Clerk, Federal Aviation Administration 

COMES NOW the Regional Counsel for the Western-Pacific Region Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), and files her Notice of Appeal in the above-c^tioned matter, pursuant to 

Rule 13.233 of the Rules of Practice for FAA Civil Penalty Actions. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Western-Pacific Region 

Lawndaie, California 

NAOMI TSUDA 

Regional Counsel 

FEB 0 8 2010 
02/08/2010 09:19 FAI 3107256816 AWP-7 12)003 

Certificate of Service 

1 hereby certify that on this date I have sent by facsimile and placed in the United States 

mail, postage prepaid, the executed original of the Notice of Appeal, addressed as fol :ows: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington. DC 20591 

Attn: Appellate Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000 

Facsimile: (202) 493-5142 

1 hereby certify that on this date I have sent by facsimile and placed in the United States 

mail, postage prepaid, a copy of the Notice of Appeal, addressed as follows: 

Arthur Wasserman, Esq. 

16380 Roscoe Blvd., Ste. 120 

VanNuys,CA 91406-122 J 

Facsimile: (818) 895-0675 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E,, East Bldg., Room E 12-:J20 

Washington, DC 20590 I 

Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

I further certify that on this date I have placed in the United States mail, postag:e prepaid, 

ce)iified mail, a true copy of the above, addressed as follows: 

Sun Quest Executive Air Charter, Inc. 

Attn; Mark Charles Smith, Chief Pilot 

7436 Hayvenhurst Ave. 

VanNuys,CA 91406 

Dated: FEB .08 2019 

JeffKai4^r ^ ^ 

Legal Technician 

Office of the Regional Counse! 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Western-Pacific Region 

Lawndaie, California
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.3

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F (the "Form 20-F") of
Telesystem International Wireless Inc., a Canadian corporation (the "Company"),
for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers
of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his respective
knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  May 20, 2003:               /s/ Bruno Ducharme
                                    ---------------------------
                                    Bruno Ducharme
                                    Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  May 20, 2003:               /s/ Andre Gauthier
                                    ---------------------------
                                    Andre Gauthier
                                    Chief Financial Officer



     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HomeAbout NRCPlans, Budgets, & Performance

# NRC Executive Fleet Vehicle Report

President Barack Obama’s Memorandum on Federal Fleet Performance, dated May 24, 2011, required Federal agencies to disclose any executive fleet vehicles that are larger than a midsize sedan or that do not comply with alternative fuel requirements. The following table lists two executive fleet vehicles, which are leased and operated by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). One of the vehicles utilizes alternative fuel. These vehicles are part of a fleet used to transport the five Presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed Commissioners (one of whom is designated by the President as Chairman of the Commission), as well as the NRC's 27 most senior career service executives and their staff, to meetings, hearings, and other locations for official business in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, May 9, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Strategic Planning
          - NRC Executive Fleet Vehicle Report
          - Evidence Building and Evaluation
          - Project Aim
          - Artificial Intelligence
          - Becoming a Modern, Risk-Informed Regulator

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, May 9, 2022
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-022 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, February 11, 1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has scheduled a

technical meeting February 19 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will begin at 8:30

a.m. in Room 2B3 of the NRC's Two White Flint North building at

11545 Rockville Pike. Discussions of the Subcommittee on Thermal

Hydraulic Phenomena will include results of the Westinghouse test

and analysis programs conducted in support of the AP600 design

certification. The subcommittee also may hear separate

presentations by representatives of the NRC staff and of the

Westinghouse Electric Corp. regarding the test data.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, are described in a Notice of Meeting published in

the February 12 edition of the Federal Register.

#