alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 430

**Question 430:** Question 373 concerns the minimum requirements for height and access restrictions of barriers used to prevent entry to locked high radiation areas (HRAs) and very high radiation areas (VHRAs) at nuclear power plants. Does this question and answer also apply to non-power reactors?

**Answer:** No. The answer to Question 373 and Regulatory Guide 8.38 which is referred to in the answer were all written to address conditions at nuclear power plants and are not necessarily adaptable to all situations at non-power reactors, materials, or fuel cycle facilities. Furthermore, the answer to Question 373 states that, in general, there are no prescriptive, specific minimum height requirements for barriers used to prevent entry to locked HRAs and VHRAs. 

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1601, 10 CFR 20.1602)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
§ 400.200 Eligible Borrower. ( a ) An eligible Borrower must be a Qualified Steel Company that can demonstrate: ( 1 ) Credit is not otherwise available to it under reasonable terms or conditions sufficient to meet its financing needs, as reflected in the financial and business plans of the company;
( 2 ) The prospective earning power of that company, together with the character and value of the security pledged, furnish reasonable assurance of repayment of the loan to be guaranteed in accordance with its terms;
( 3 ) The company has agreed to permit audits by the General Accounting Office and an independent auditor acceptable to the Board prior to the issuance of the guarantee and while any such guaranteed loan is outstanding;
( 4 ) It has experienced layoffs, production losses, or financial losses between January 1, 1998, and the date of application for the Guarantee, demonstrated as a comparison between employment, production, or net income existing on January 1, 1998 and on the date of application; and
( 5 ) In the case of a purchaser of substantial assets of a Qualified Steel Company; the Qualified Steel Company is unable to re-organize itself.
( b ) For purposes of this section, a company will be considered a purchaser of substantial assets of a Qualified Steel Company if the company's identifiable assets purchased from a Qualified Steel Company are 50 percent or more of the consolidated assets of that Qualified Steel Company and its subsidiaries.
( c ) The Lender must provide with its application a letter from at least one lending institution other than the Lender to which the Borrower has applied for financial assistance dated within six months of submission of the application, indicating that the Borrower was denied for substantially the same loan it is now applying for, and the reasons the Borrower was unable to obtain the financing for which it applied. In addition, the Lender applying for a guarantee under this Program must certify that it would not make the loan without the Board's guarantee.
[64 FR 57933, Oct. 27, 1999, as amended at 65 FR 70293, Nov. 22, 2000]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-050 March 23, 2000

INDIAN POINT 2 EVENT INFORMATION

AVAILABLE ON NRC EXTERNAL WEB SITE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is now posting detailed information and documents

on the recent steam generator event at Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant in New York on its external

web site in a centralized location.

The Indian Point 2 temporary web page is posted at

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/REACTOR/IP/index.html . It contains background information, news

releases, public meeting notices, reference documents on steam generators and inspection reports.

Recently added to the web site are: (1) a 2/28/00 memo from the Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation to the Office of Research asking for an independent review of the safety evaluation of the

steam generator tube inspection interval and repair criteria; (2) a 3/16/00 memo from the Office of

Research conveying its independent assessment; and (3) a 3/20/00 memorandum from the Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation relating to potential lessons learned from the recent Indian Point 2

incident.

Other pertinent documents will be added as they are completed and become available to the

public.

###
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No. 04-09-00217- CV E.E. HO OD & SONS, INC. , Appellant

v . Matias Chapa P ER EZ and Sonia San J uanita Sanche z C hapa, I n d iv id u a ll y a n d o n b e h a lf o f M a ti a s Ch a

p a Sa n c h e z, D a is y

A ma r a n ti Ch a p a Sa n c h e z, and De y ra N atalie Chapa

Sanchez, Minors Appellee s Fr om the 293rd Judi cial District Court, Dimmit C ounty , Texas

Trial Court No. 06-10- 10496-DCV Honora ble Cy nthia L . Muniz , J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: November 11, 2009 DI SMI SSED; J OI

NT MOTI ON TO D I SMI SS GR ANTED The parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appea l. We gr ant the motion. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)( 2). B eca

use the motion does not disc lose an a g ree ment of the pa rties re g arding assessment of costs, we order

all costs assessed ag ainst appellant. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(d)(a bsent ag ree ment of the pa rties, costs ar e taxed ag ainst appellant). PER CU RI AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,603,737
<SECURITIES>                                10,854,450
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,723,524
<ALLOWANCES>                                   189,402
<INVENTORY>                                  3,507,545
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,065,660
<PP&E>                                      20,589,540
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,060,839
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,236,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,525,816
<BONDS>                                      7,686,339
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       266,363
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,748,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,236,549
<SALES>                                     11,761,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,761,237
<CGS>                                        8,711,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,179,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (390,726)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             297,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,036,029)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,036,029)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,036,029)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 199 (Friday, October 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23128]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Issuance of Permits

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of issuance of permits for marine mammals.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following permits were issued.

ADDRESSES: Documents and other information submitted with these 
applications are available for review, subject to the requirements of 
the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who 
submits a written request for a copy of such documents to: U.S. Fish 
and Wildlife Service, Division of Management Authority, 4401 North 
Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203; fax 703/358-2281.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Division of Management Authority, 
telephone 703/358-2104.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on the dates 
below, as authorized by the provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection 
Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361, et seq.), the Fish and 
Wildlife Service issued the requested permits subject to certain 
conditions set forth therein.

Marine Mammals

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Receipt of
                                  application
Permit number     Applicant         Federal        Permit issuance date
                                Register notice
------------------------------------------------------------------------
041309.......  Marine Mammals   69 FR 45343;     August 31, 2004
                Management.      July 29, 2004.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: October 1, 2004.
Michael L. Carpenter,
Senior Permit Biologist, Branch of Permits, Division of Management 
Authority.
[FR Doc. 04-23128 Filed 10-14-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 559 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 559

   To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 2021

Mr. Merkley (for himself and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRAND RONDE RESERVATION ACT AMENDMENT.

    Section 1(d) of Public Law 100-425 (commonly known as the ``Grand 
Ronde Reservation Act'') (102 Stat. 1594) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``lands within the State 
        of Oregon'' and inserting ``the 84 acres known as the Thompson 
        Strip'';
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) Gaming prohibition.--Any real property obtained by 
        the Tribes as part of a land claim settlement approved by the 
        United States shall not be eligible, or used, for any class II 
        gaming or class III gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
        Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) (as those terms are defined in 
        section 4 of that Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)).''.

SEC. 2. TREATY RIGHTS OF FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBES.

    Nothing in this Act, or an amendment made by this Act, shall be 
construed to enlarge, confirm, adjudicate, affect, or modify any treaty 
right of an Indian Tribe (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304)).
                                 <all>
```
# Attachment B - Legacy-AWS SPCC Violations

Address City StateZip CodeViolation*Estimated Date SPCC Plan RequiredStatute of

Limitation Date **Estimated Date

SPCC Plan Finalized Estimated

Duration of Violation in Months  Tank Volumes 900 S. Shackleford Rd. LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 IP 1/8/1998 7/7/2001 5/22/2004 34.5 3,000-gallon AST I-80 AND RATTLESNAKE ROAD

SIGNAL PEAK SODA SPRINGSCA 95728 IP 11/7/1991 7/7/2001 12/9/2003 29.0 2,000-gallon AST KUKAIAU RANCH PAAUILO HI 96776 IP 5/1/2001 7/7/2001 10/1/2003 27.0 2,700-gallon AST 4157 109TH ST URBANDALE IA 50322 IP 1/8/1998 7/7/2001 1/9/2002 6.0 4,250-gallon AST; 6x330-gallon portables 4510 O'HARA DRIVE EVANSVILLE IN 47711 IP 1/8/1998 7/7/2001 3/16/2006 56.0 4,000-gallon AST 160 James Drive Saint Rose LA 70087 IP 1/8/1998 7/7/2001 11/9/2006 ** * 64.0 Historial tank data not available, but subject to SPCC. 155 NORTHBOROUGH DRIVESOUTHBOROUGHMA 01772 IP 11/14/2001 NA 10/1/2003 22.5 4,000-gallon AST 198 ARMSTRONG RD New Hyde Park NY 11040 IP 4/16/2003 NA 10/1/2003 5.5 8,000-gallon AST; 200-gallon AST 2 Kross Keys Dr Albany NY 12205 NP 8/26/2003 NA 1/1/2008 52.0 3,000-gallon AST 3201 QUAIL SPRINGS PKWYOKLAHOMA CITYOK 73134 NP 12/20/20007/7/2001 10/1/2003 27.0 1,831-gallon AST 485 LASLEY AVE WILKES-BARRE PA 18706 IP 10/3/20007/7/2001 10/1/2003 27.0 4,000-gallon AST; 125-gallon AST; 3x70-gallon portables 4400 STAGGERBRUSH ROAD AUSTIN TX 78749 IP 5/14/20007/7/2001 12/31/2002 18.0 4,000-gallon AST; 2x600-gallon ASTs 800 Venture Dr. Allen TX 75013 IP 5/15/2002 NA 4/22/2003 11.0 2x25,000-gallon USTs; 4x100-gallon ASTs 5825 99th Street MILWAUKEE WI 53225 IP 1/8/1998 7/7/2001 2/27/2006 55.5 5,000-gallon AST



### *** The corrective action date is based upon the estimated date of tank removal. **** Estimate is based upon the estimated onset of violation or the Statute of Limitation Date, whichever is later. * IP = Incomplete Plan; NP = No Plan ** On July 7, 2006, EPA and NCW entered into a Tolling Agreement, currently in effect, concerning the violations alleged in this CAFO. By operation of the Tolling Agreement, the statute of limitations for these violations begins to run five years prior to the Agreement date, on July 7, 2001.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5329 

To amend the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act to improve 

the program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20, 2022 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 

considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To amend the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation 

Act to improve the program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BILL EMERSON GOOD SAMARITAN FOOD DONA4 TION ACT. 

5 The Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation 

6 Act (42 U.S.C. 1791) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (b)— 

8 (A) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘or is 

9 charged a good Samaritan reduced price’’ be10 fore the period at the end; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5329 CPS

1 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (6) 

2 through (10) as paragraphs (7) through (11), 

3 respectively; 

4 (C) by inserting after paragraph (5) the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(6) GOOD SAMARITAN REDUCED PRICE.—The 

7 term ‘good Samaritan reduced price’ means, with re8 spect to the price of an apparently wholesome food 

9 or apparently fit grocery product, a price that is an 

10 amount not greater than the cost of handling, ad11 ministering, harvesting, processing, packaging, 

12 transporting, and distributing the apparently whole13 some food or apparently fit grocery product.’’; and 

14 (D) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(12) QUALIFIED DIRECT DONOR.—The term 

16 ‘qualified direct donor’ means a retail grocer, whole17 saler, agricultural producer, agricultural processor, 

18 agricultural distributor, restaurant, caterer, school 

19 food authority, or institution of higher education (as 

20 defined in section 102 of the Higher Education Act 

21 of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002)).’’; and 

22 (2) in subsection (c)— 

23 (A) in paragraphs (1) and (2), by inserting 

24 ‘‘at zero cost or at a good Samaritan reduced 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5329 CPS

1 price’’ after ‘‘needy individuals’’ each place it 

2 appears; 

3 (B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as 

4 paragraph (4); 

5 (C) by inserting after paragraph (2) the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(3) DIRECT DONATIONS TO NEEDY INDIVID8 UALS.—A qualified direct donor shall not be subject 

9 to civil or criminal liability arising from the nature, 

10 age, packaging, or condition of apparently whole11 some food or an apparently fit grocery product that 

12 the qualified direct donor donates in good faith to a 

13 needy individual at zero cost.’’; and 

14 (D) in paragraph (4) (as so redesignated), 

15 by striking ‘‘and (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘, (2), and 

16 (3)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### § 4.340 Disposition of the record.

Subsequent to a decision by the Board, the record filed with the Board and all documents added during the appeal proceedings, including the Board's decision, shall be forwarded to the official of the Bureau of Indian Affairs whose decision was appealed for proper disposition in accordance with rules and regulations concerning treatment of Federal records.
#### In the Matter of Samuel Rothenberg, as Secretary of Picture Frame Workers Union, Local 18465, A.F.L., Appellant, against William J. Kelley et al., Constituting the New York State Labor Relations Board, Respondents.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 884.]
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                      [MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP LETTERHEAD]

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into all Registration
Statements on Form 10-KSB of Coddle Creek Financial Corp. of our report dated
January 15, 2003, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition
of Coddle Creek Financial Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2002 and 2001,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31,
2002.

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
March 24, 2003
Fw: Shiras, City of Marquette

John Summerhays to: Martha Keating 03/27/2012 03:15 PM

From: John Summerhays/R5/USEPA/US

To: Martha Keating/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

----- Forwarded by John Summerhays/R5/USEPA/US on 03/27/2012 02:14 PM -----

From: "Cooper, Teresa (DEQ)" <COOPERT@michigan.gov>

To: John Summerhays/R5/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Irvine, Robert (DEQ)" <IRVINER@michigan.gov>

Date: 03/27/2012 02:06 PM

Subject: Shiras, City of Marquette

In reply to your question and according to our records, the #3 boiler at the City of Marquette Power plant 

was installed in 1981 and therefore was/is not subject to the BART requirements

Teresa R. Cooper, Senior EQA

Air Quality Division, SDU

Constitution Hall, 3rd Floor North

Lansing, MI 48909

coopert@michigan.gov

517-335-2247 Fax 517-241-7499
§ 206.349 Consistency determinations. Section 6(a)(6) of CBRA requires that certain actions be consistent with the purposes of that statute if the actions are to be carried out on a unit of the CBRA. The purpose of CBRA, as stated in section 2(b) of that statute, is to minimize the loss of human life, wasteful expenditure of Federal revenues, and the damage to fish, wildlife, and other natural resources associated with the coastal barriers along with Atlantic and Gulf coasts. For those actions where a consistency determination is required, the FEMA Regional Administrator shall evaluate the action according to the following procedures, and the evaluation shall be included in the written request for consultation with DOI. ( a ) *Impact identification.* FEMA shall identify impacts of the following types that would result from the proposed action: ( 1 ) Risks to human life;
( 2 ) Risks of damage to the facility being repaired or replaced;
( 3 ) Risks of damage to other facilities;
( 4 ) Risks of damage to fish, wildlife, and other natural resources;
( 5 ) Condition of existing development served by the facility and the degree to which its redevelopment would be encouraged; and
( 6 ) Encouragement of new development.
( b ) *Mitigation.* FEMA shall modify actions by means of practicable mitigation measures to minimize adverse effects of the types listed in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Conservation.* FEMA shall identify practicable measures that can be incorporated into the proposed action and will conserve natural and wildlife resources.
( d ) *Finding.* For those actions required to be consistent with the purposes of CBRA, the above evaluation must result in a finding of consistency with CBRA by the Regional Administrator before funding may be approved for that action.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-61 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, April 19, 1996)

NRC'S ADVISORY PANEL ON ELECTRONIC INFORMATION SYSTEM

FOR WASTE REPOSITORY LICENSING TO MEET IN LAS VEGAS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's special panel on

development and operation of an electronic information management

system--related to future licensing of a high-level radioactive

waste repository--will meet May 2 and 3 in Las Vegas.

The meeting will be in Pueblo Room #1119, Clark County

Government Center, 500 Grand Central Parkway, from 8:30 a.m. to

4 p.m. on Thursday, May 2, and from 8:30 a.m. to 10 a.m., as

needed, on Friday, May 3.

The NRC established the Licensing Support System Advisory

Review Panel in 1989 to provide advice and recommendations to the

NRC and DOE concerning the design, development and operation of

an electronic information management system, to be known as the

Licensing Support System.

The system, which is not yet operational, would be set up to

contain documents of DOE, its contractors, and all other parties

to a licensing proceeding to be conducted when DOE applies for an

NRC license to build and operate a high-level waste repository.

The Licensing Support System would also contain documents of

interested government participants, contractors and potential

parties. All parties to the proceeding would have access to the

system from individual computer facilities.

The advisory review panel consists of representatives from

the State of Nevada; Nye County, Nevada; a coalition of other

Nevada counties and California counties adjoining Nye County; the

National Congress of American Indians; the nuclear industry; DOE;

NRC; and other Federal agencies that have experience with large

electronic information management systems.

The meeting agenda is as follows:

(1) System Administrator’s report;

(2) DOE activity report, including its schedule for system

development, availability of the automated records, and a
demonstration of the system;

(3) System senior management team report; and

(4) Future panel activities.

Interested persons may attend as observers and may make oral

presentations or file written statements. But persons wishing to

make oral presentations should contact John C. Hoyle, Office of

the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

20555, telephone: 301/415-1969, as far in advance as practicable

so that appropriate arrangements can be made.

#