2055 Corte del Nogal , Carlsbad, CA 92011

- Tel: (760) 930

- 9966

- Fax: (760) 930

- 9974 www.mc2consultantsinc.com

March 20 , 2015

U.S. D e p a rtme n t of T r a n sport a t i on

Do c k e t Man a g e ment S y s tem

1200 N e w J e rs e y Av e

., S E W a shin g ton, DC 20590

R e : P e t i t i on of MC Consultants, I n c

. , for a n E x e mp t ion P u r suant to S ec t i on 333 of the F A A

Mode r ni z a t i on a nd Re f o r m A c t of 2012

To W hom i t M a y Con c e r n:

P u r suant to S ec t i on 333 of the F A A Mod e rni z a t i on a nd Re f o r m A c t of 20 1 2 ( " R e fo r m A c t " ) a nd

14 C. F .R. P a rt 11, MC Consultants, I n c

. ( " MC " ) h e r e b y a ppl i e s for a n e x e mp t ion f r om t he

Fe d e r a l Aviation Re g ulations (" F ARs " ) id e nt i fi e d b e l o w, to a l l ow c om m e r c ial op e r a t i on of small

unmann e d ae r i a l vehi c les ( i.e., " small unm a nn e d a ir c r a f t " or " U A S " ) f o r c ondu c t i n g a e ri a l

inspe c t i ons a nd sur v e y s o f str uc tu r e s and f ac i l i t i e s a s pa r t of exterior building e v a luations.

This petition is made based on information outlined in this Petition for Exemption, as well as

the a c companying MC UAS Fl i ght Operat i ons Manual (hereinafter "MC Flight Operat i on

Manual") , Phantom 2 Vision P lus Pilot Training Guide v1.1

, Phantom 2 Vision Plus Quick Start

Guide , Inspire 1 User Manual v1.0 , Inspire 1 Sa fety Guidelines

, Ins pire 1 Maintenance

ManualV1.0 , 1345 Prop eller Locks Quick Start Guide , Intelligent Fli ght Battery Safety

Guidelines ( c ol l ec t i v e l y r e fer re d to a s " Man u fa c tur e r M a n u a ls " ). A c o p y of MC’s Op e r a t i ons

Man u a l s a nd other supporting mat e ri a ls will be submi t ted to the F AA a s co n fi d e nt i a l do c uments

pursu a nt t o 14 C. F .R. § 11.35 ( b )

, a s the mat e ri a ls contain c onfid e nt i a l c o m m e r c ial info r mation

t h a t i s hi g h l y p r opri e ta r y to MC . In addition, these do c u ments c ontain op e r a t i n g c ondi t ions and

p r o ce du r e s that a r e not g e n e r a l l y a v a i l a ble to the publ i c a nd a re p rot ec t e d f rom re le a s e und e r

t h e F re e dom of I n f o rm a t i on A c t, 5 U. S .C. § 552 e t seq.MC Consultants, Inc.

2055 Corte del Nogal 03 / 20 /2015

Carlsbad, CA 92011 Page 2 of 14 TABLE OF CONTENTS :

1. Glossary of Abbreviations

2. D e s cr i p tion of P e ti t io n e r

3. D e s cr i p tion of P r o p os e d O p er a t io n s

A. Forensic Evaluation and Building Condition Assessments

B. Vehicular Accident Investigations

4. R e levant Sta t u to r y Au t h o r ity

5. MC’s Pr o p osed U A S O p er a t io n s Mee t the R e qu ir eme n ts of S ec tion 333 of t h e R e f o r m A c t

A. App r ov a l i s W a r ra nted B a s e d on the U A S ' s S i z e

, W e i g ht, S p ee d, a nd Op e r a t i on a l

C a p a bi l i t y

B. App r ov a l i s W a r ra nted B a s e d on the O p e r a t i on a l R e strictions S e t F o r th i n the

Op e r a t i ons Man u a l

6. R e g u latio n s F r o m W h i c h Ex e m p tion i s R e qu e s t e d

A. 14 C. F .R. P a rt 21, Subp a rt H

– Air w o r th i n e ss C e r t ific a tes a nd 14 C. F .R. § 91.20

B. 14 C. F .R. P a rt 27 A irwo r th i n e ss S tand a rds: No r mal C a te g o r y Rotor c r a ft

C. 14 C. F .R. § 91.7 (a ): C i vil Air c r a ft Ai r wo r th i n e ss

D. 14 C. F .R. § 91.9 ( b ) (2 ) : C iv i l Air c r a ft F l i g ht Man u a l i n the A ir c r a ft a nd 14 C. F .R. §

91.203 (a ) a nd ( b ) : C a r r y i n g Civ i l Air c raft Ce r t i fi ca t i on a nd R e g is t r a t i on

E. 14 C. F .R. §§ 91.9 (c ), 45

. 23(b) a nd 45.27 ( a ): Ai r c r a ft M a rki n g a nd I d e nt i fi ca t i on

R e quir e m e nts

F. 14 C. F .R. § 91.103: P r e fli g ht A c t i on

G. 14 C. F .R. § 91.119: Min i mum S a fe Alt i tudes

H. 14 C. F .R. § 91.121: Al t i met e r Settin g s

I. 14 C. F .R. § 91.151 (a ): Fuel R e quir e ments for F l i g ht i n V F R Condi t ions

J. 14 C. F .R. § 91.405 (a ), 9 1.407 (a ) ( 1 ), 91

. 409(a) ( 1) a nd ( 2 ); 91.417 ( a ) a nd ( b ) :

Mainten a n c e I nspe c t i ons

K. 14 C. F .R. P a rt 61, 14 C. F .R. § 61.3, 14 C. F .R. § 61.113: P riv a te P i lot P rivile g e s

and L i m i t a t i o n s

7. Privacy

8. P ub l i c I n t e re s t

9. Concl u sionMC Consultants, Inc.

2055 Corte del Nogal 03 / 20 /2015

Carlsbad, CA 92011 Page 3 of 14

SECTION 1: G L O S S A R Y OF AB B R EVI A TIONS

A G L Above G r ou n d L e v e l

A O I A re a of I nte re st

ATC Air T ra f f ic Control

ATO Air T ra f f ic O r g a ni z a t i o n

C. F

. R. Code of Fe d e r a l R e g ul a ti ons

COA C e r t i f ic a te of A u tho r i z a t i on

F AA Fe d e r a l Avi a t i on A d m i ni str a t ion

F AR Fe d e r a l Avi a t i on Re g ulations

GCS G r o u nd Control S tation

GPS Gl o b a l P osi t io n ing S y stem

L O L L oss of L ink

NAS N a t i on a l A ir s p ac e S y st e m

N O TAM Notice to Airm a n

P I C P i l ot I n Com m a nd

RTH R e t u r n To H ome

S ec ti on 333 F AA Mode r ni z a t i on a n d R e fo r m A c t of 2012 ( FM RA) S e c t ion 333

S OP S t a nd a r d Op e r at ing P ro c e dur e s

UA Unm a nn e d Air c r a ft

UAS Unm a nn e d Ai r c r a ft S y st e m

V F R Vi s u a l F l i g ht Rules

V L OS Vi s u a l L in e o f Site

VMC Vi s u a l M e teo r o l o g ic a l C ondi t ions

VO Vi s u a l O b s e rv e r

VT O L V e r t ic a l T a k e o f f a nd L a ndingMC Consultants, Inc.

2055 Corte del Nogal 03 / 20 /2015

Carlsbad, CA 92011 Page 4 of 14

SECTION 2: DESCRIPTION OF PETITIONER

Established in 1989, MC Consultants is a leading national consulting firm with decades of

experience and expertise in construction management, forensic investigations, litigation

support, civil engineering, environmental investigations, and right

- of

- way management

services. Our multidisciplinary team of consultants consists of h ighly credentialed

professionals whose specialized knowledge and expertise allows us to deliver “the

unmatched total solution” to every client. MC Consultants’ reputation for reliability and

innovation is based on years of industry experience, seasoned lea dership, and a

distinguished team of professionals. The integration of experience and innovation provides

opportunities for successful outcomes and enables us to efficiently deliver superior services

and results that our clients have come to expect.

MC se e ks to utilize the l a test U A S te c hnolo g i e s to p r ovide higher level of efficiency a nd s a f e r

s e rvi ce s for our clients. F o r e nsic e v a l u a t i ons and building condition assessments p e r f o r med

b y MC oft e n invo l ve the p h y sic a l i nsp e c t i on of o u tdoor stru c tur e s and f a c i l i t ies f or the

a ssessment o f current element condition, d a m a g e

, d e fe c ts and acc idents. T h e se inspe c t i ons

t y pic a l l y invo l ve r e c o r ding i ma g e s to d o c um e nt e x is t ing c ondi t ions. D e p e nding o n the n a ture

of t h e inspe c t i o n , obtaining i m a g e s of ce rt a in p h y si c a l f e a tu r e s m a y not be f ea s i ble due to

da n g e rous c o n di t ions, l i m i t e d acce ss on the stru c ture , risk of damage to structures, or t h e

e x ce ss i ve h e i g ht of t h e r e quir e d vie w i n g a n g le.

The use o f U A S

- a ss i sted photo g rap h y and video will pro v ide a pr a c t ic a l m ea ns to p e r f o r m

fo re nsic evaluations and building condition assessments th a t would be othe r wise u nsa fe to

the employees of MC and the general public . The p rima r y b e n e fit of this te c hnolo g y would be

to assist i n the c lose, d e tailed a e ri a l ins p ec t i on a nd e x a m i n a t i on of bui l ding mat e r i a ls.

I nspe c t i on of st e e p

- s l op e d ro o fs a nd mu l t i

- sto r y e x te r ior w a l l s for r e sidenti a l and c om me r c i a l

bu i ld i n g s, e x a m i n a t i on of e x h a ust chimn e y s/ s t a c ks at indus t ri a l f a c i l i t ies, a nd t he a ssessment

of acc ide n ts b y do c umenti n g e vid e n c e a r e just a f e w e x a mp l e s of wh e re U A S

- a ss i sted

photo g r a p h y w o uld be of g re a t ben e fit to MC consultants.

MC is de d ic a ted to p r ov i ding te c hnol o g i c a l l y d r iven a nd innovative so l ut i ons to a ddr e ss our

c l i e nt ’s n e e ds. T h e promise of U A S

- a ss i sted photo g r a p h y / video o f f e rs a s a f e r a nd mo r e

e f f ici e nt me a ns to p e r f o rm f o re ns i c e v a luations and building condition assessments. The use

of this technology wi l l better se r v e c l i e nts and i mprove publ i c sa fe t y

. I t i s in t his s pirit t h a t MC

se e ks an e x e mp t ion t o use U A S technology for the c o m m e r c ial pu r pose o f p e r f o r m i n g a e ri a l

i nspe c t ion s duri n g building e v a luations.

The c onta c t i n f o rm a t i on f o r Petitioner is as f ol l o w s:

Kai Loedel

Chief Op e r a t i n g O ffic e r

MC Consultants, I n c

. 2055 Corte del Nogal

Carlsbad, CA 92011

P hon e : (760) 930

- 9966

Fax: (760) 930

- 9974

Email: Kai.Loedel@mcconsultants.comMC Consultants, Inc.

2055 Corte del Nogal 03 / 20 /2015

Carlsbad, CA 92011 Page 5 of 14

SECTION 3: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED OPERATIONS

MC is seeking e x e mp t i on pu r suant to S ec t i on 333 of the Re f o r m A c t t o use small U A S s

w e i g hi n g less than 6.7 pounds for c ondu c t i n g ae ri a l i nsp e c t i ons a nd surv e y s duri n g i t s

fo re nsic e v a luations and building condition assessments. All UAS ope ra t i ons will oc c ur und e r

c ont r ol l e d c ondi t ion s

. The pro p osed U A S op e r a t i ons will be c ond u c ted in a c c o r d a n c e with t he

c ondi t ions and lim i tat i ons of this P e t i t i on f o r E x e mp t ion and MC’s Flight Op e r a t i on Man u a l

. As

d e tailed in the MC Flight Op e r a t i on Man u a l , the p r opos e d U A S op e r a t i ons will be l i m i ted to

d a y t i me VF R c ondi t ions i n un c ontroll e d a irsp a ce

, a nd will o cc ur a t le a st 5 m i les a w a y f rom a n

a irp o rt as detailed in the Manufacturer’s Manuals. In addition, MC’s Flight Operation Manual

inco r por a tes r e dund a nt s a f e g u a rds to assu r e that the a ir c r a ft do e s not tr a v e l ou t side the

c ontroll e d a r e a o f U AS op e r a t i ons, in c lud i n g , but not l i m i ted to, GPS "g e o

- f e n c i n g "

t e c hnolo g ies

. The geo

- fencing technology will be used to rest rict which geographic

locations UAS operate s within. All MC UAS operation will utilize geo fencing technology to

set UAS limits of travel to a controlled area encompassing the building, facility, vehicular

accident site, or forensic evaluation location that is under assessment.

MC will utilize the followin g UAS’s for c ondu c t i n g ae ri a l i nsp e c t i ons a nd surv e y s duri n g i t s

fo re nsic e v a luations and building condition assessments (for compensation or hire within

NAS):

 DJI Phantom 2 Vision+

. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ is comprised of a vertical takeoff

and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) and a transportable Ground Control

Station (GCS). The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ UA has a maximum gross weight of

approximately 2.7 pounds, while having a diagonal distance (motor to motor) of

approximately 14 inches, and maximum speed of 34 mph (approximately 29 knots).

The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ is equipped with four propellers, each being driven by a

Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motor

.

 DJI Inspire 1. The DJI Inspire 1 UAS is comprised of a vertical takeoff and landing

(VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) and a transportable Ground Control Station (GCS).

The DJI Inspire 1 UA has a maximum gross weight of approximately 6.7 pounds,

while having a diameter of 23 inches, and maximum speed of 49 mph (approximately

42 knots). The DJI Inspire 1 UA is equipped with four propellers, each being driven by

a Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motor.

Sub

- Section A: Forensic Evaluation and Building Condition Assessments

MC performs hundreds of forensic evaluations and various building condition assessments

every year. These evaluations include both distant and close observation and photographic

documentation. C lose proximity inspections of building elements include review and

documentation of exterior roof covering s , exterior cladding s , windows, doors, exterior

balconies, safety railing, etc. While most of the building elements are easily accessible by

ladder, some elements require the use of aerial work platforms and various types of

scaffolding. However, some building element s such as tall roofs are at such a height, that

conventional ladders cannot reach them, and the use of other inspection methods may not be

feasible due to site conditions and project logistics. UAS assisted photography will aid in

documenting the observabl e conditions of these building components that are not accessible

by any other safe or practical means. While the use of ladders, aerial work platforms andMC Consultants, Inc.

2055 Corte del Nogal 03 / 20 /2015

Carlsbad, CA 92011 Page 6 of 14

suspended scaffolding are appropriate in some cases, depending on inspection conditions,

these metho ds may expose both the inspecting engineers and the general public to

unnecessary risk of harm or serious injury, making their use impractical or impossible. UAS

assisted photography provides a safe and effective alternative means for performing forensic

e valuations and various building condition assessments, while also minimizing the risk of

harm to inspectors and the general public. GPS "g e o

- f e n c i n g " t e c hnolo g ies may be used to

set UAS limits of travel to a controlled area encompassing the building or fac ility that is

under evaluation.

Sub

- Section B: Vehicular Accident Investigations

M C periodically evaluates v ehicular accidents to determine causation through state

- of

- the

- art

data collection, three

- dimensional computer simulation, and analysis software tools. MC

analyzes single and multiple

- vehicle accidents of all types and investigates the roles of

human, vehicle and environmental factors in such accidents. A ccident reconstruction

engineers perform thorough analyses to develop a reconstruction of the a ccident that is

consistent with physical evidence. Our analytical procedure consists of a series of systematic

steps that includes reviewing documents, identifying technical issues, documenting the

accident site, and conducting vehicle and component inspec tions. T h e site evaluations

c om m on l y invo l ve e x a m i n a t i on of the a f fec t e d v e hicl e (s )

, a s w e ll a s do c umenting c ondi t ions

at the si t e wh e r e the a c c i d e nt oc c u r r e d. S i t e evaluations m a y r e quire c lose e x a m i n a t i on to

i d e nt if y d e tails s u c h a s sk i d ma r ks, gr a de v a ri a t i ons, and r o a dw a y d e f e c ts. Overall

observation and distant photographic documentation are necessary to assess the site

conditions of the accident location , but oft e n ca nnot be f e a sib l y obtain e d usi n g t r a di t ional

f i x e d

- wing or r otor c r a ft a ir c r a ft. A e ri a l i m a g e s p rovid e d b y U A S technology would a id i n the

a n a l y sis of v e hicle p a th w a y s, tr a f f ic b e h a vior a t i nt e r s ec t i ons, a nd visuali z ing the g e n e r a l a r e a

of the acc i d e nt. Kno w ledge g a ined f rom v e hic l e a c c ident investi g a t i ons is used b y the

t ra nsport a t i on industry to i mprove publ i c s a f e t y

. W h e n n e ce ss a r y , loc a l l a w e n f o rc e ment sh a ll

be used to establish a s ec u r e z one a round a t r a f fic in t e rs ec t i on to a l l ow safe and efficient

UAS op e r a t i on. GPS "g e o

- f e n c i n g " t e c hnolo g ies may be used to set UAS limits of travel to

a controlled area encompassing the accident site

.

SECTION 4: RELEVANT STATUTORY AUTHORITY

This Petition for Exemption is submitted pursuant to Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform

Act. Congress has directed the FAA "to safely accelerate the integration of civil unmanned

aircraft systems into the national airspace system." Pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform

Act, the FAA Administrator is to permit unmanned aircraft systems to operate in the National

Air Space ("NAS") where it is safe to do so base d on the following considerations:

 The UAS size, weight, speed, and operation capability;

 Operation of the UAS in close proximity to airports and populated areas; and

 Operation of the UAS within the visual line of sight of the operator.

In additio n, the FAA Administrator has general authority to grant exemptions from the

agency's safety regulations and minimum standards when the Administrator decides a

requested exempt ion is in the public interest. See 49 U.S.C. § 106(f) (defining the authority of

the Administrator); 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f) (permitting exemptions from §§ 44701(a), (b) and §§

44702

– 44716, et seq.). A party requesting an exemption must explain the reasons why the

exemption, (1) would benefit the public as a whole, and (2) would not adv ersely affect safetyMC Consultants, Inc.

2055 Corte del Nogal 03 / 20 /2015

Carlsbad, CA 92011 Page 7 of 14

(or how it would provide a level of safety at least equal to the existing rules). See 14 C.F.R. §

11.81 (petitions for exemption).

SECTION 5: PROPOSED UAS OPERATIONS MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 333

The small UAS operations proposed by MC in this Petition for Exemption qualify for

expedited approval pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act as each of the statutory criteria

and relevant factors are satisfied.

 Approval is Warranted Based on the UAS's Size, Weight, Speed, and Operational

Capability

MC will employ the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ quadcopter for the operations specified in this

Petition for Exemption. This is the same UAS model approved for use in the FAA's Grant of

Exemption to Douglas Trudeau, Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 048 1. This UAS has a maximum take

off weight of less than 3 pounds. The flight speed will not exceed 30 knots, and it will not be

flown in controlled airspace or at an altitude that exceeds 400 feet AGL without prior written

authorization and approval from th e FAA. All flights will be flown in such a way that they can

be safely terminated once the operator receives the first low battery warning (approximately

30% of the battery's maximum charge). The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ does not carry any

flammable propellan t or fuel. The UAS also has an integrated GPS system that calculates the

UAS's position and height and relays that information via a secure connection to the operator.

Additionally, as acknowledged by the FAA in its prior grant of exemption to Douglas Tru deau,

the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+

, " H as the capability to operate safely after experiencing certain in

flight contingencies or failures and uses an auto

- pilot system to maintain UAS stability and

control. The UAS is also able to respond to a loss of GPS or a lost

- link event with pre

coordinated automated flight maneuvers."

 Approval is Warranted Based on the Operational Restrictions Set Forth in the Flight

Operations Manual

The MC Flight Operations Manual and the Manufacturer's Manuals for the selected UAS will

contain all the procedures and limitations necessary to safely and successfully perform the

operations specified in this Petition for Exemption. To assist the FAA in making a safety

assessment of MC’s proposed operations, below is a summary of operati onal limitations and

conditions that will ensure an equivalent or higher level of safety to operations conducted

under current regulatory guidelines:

1. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ w e i g hs less than 3 pounds, ful l y load e d.

2. The DJI Inspire 1 weights less than 7 pounds, fully loaded.

3. The ra dio f r e qu e n c ies u s e d for op e r a t i ons a nd c o n trol of the U AS (2.4 G H z ) w i l l c omp l y

with t he Fe d e r a l Com m unic a t i ons C om m i ss i on ( " F C C " ) or oth e r a ppro p ri a te

g o v e rnm e nt ov e rsi g ht a g e n c y r e qui r e ments.

4. Mini m um c re w f or e ac h op e r a t i on will c onsist of a pi l ot, who will be P i l o t

- in Com m a nd

( " P I C ") of the U A S

, a nd one o r mo r e Visu a l Obs e rvers ( " Obs e rv e r " ) a s n ece ss a r y to

sa fe l y c on d u c t t he m i ss i on.MC Consultants, Inc.

2055 Corte del Nogal 03 / 20 /2015

Carlsbad, CA 92011 Page 8 of 14

5. The U A S shall be o p e r a t e d with i n Visu a l L ine o f S i g ht (" V L OS " ) of the P IC a nd

Obs e rver a t all t i m e s. The P I C will use h uman vi s ion unaid e d b y a n y d e vi c e other than

c o r r ec t ive l e nses.

6. The UAS shall be operated during daylight only. Operations shall occur during daytime

VFR Meteorological Conditions; flights under special visual flight rules ("SVFR") shall

not be conducted. UAS operations under Instrument Flight Rules, at night, or beyond

VLOS are prohibited.

7. The Obs e r v e r d e s i g n a ted f or a n y op e r a t i on will be in consta n t vo i c e c ont a c t wi t h the

P I C.

8. The a ddi t ional re qui r e m e nts i d e nt i fi e d in t he e x e m pt i on g r a nt shall be a dd e d to MC’s

Flight Op e r a t i ons Man ua l. The Flight O p e r a t i o n s Man ua l wi l l be m a in t a i n e d a nd made

a v a i l a ble to the A d m i nis t r a tor upon re qu e st. I f a disc r e p a n c y e x is t s b e tw ee n the

c ondi t ions and lim i tations in the g r a n ted e x e mp t ions and the MC Flight Op e r a t i ons

Man u a l , the c ondi t ions and lim i tatio n s in t he g r a nted e x e mp t ions will incorporated into

the Flight Operations Manual.

9. The UAS will be operated and maintained according to the Manufacturer's Manuals

and any required manufacturer Safety/Service Bulletins.

10. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption will be identified by serial

number, registered in acc ordance with 14 C.F.R part 47, and have identification

markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large

as practicable

.

11. Prior to each flight the PIC shall inspect the UAS to confirm that it is in a condition safe

for fli ght. The PIC shall not operate the UAS if the inspection reveals a condition that

affects the safe operation of the UAS until the necessary maintenance has been

performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. All maintenance

and altern ations must be properly documented in the UAS records.

12. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation

or flight characteristics must undergo a functional test flight in accordance with MC’s

Flight Operations Manuals. The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must make

an entry in the UAS aircraft records of the flight.

13. Prior to the operation, there will be a Flight Plan setting forth the operational limitations

and conditions for the flight operations, as well as key personnel contact information

and a description of any potential hazards on or in the vicinity of the survey site.

14. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast

weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the

intende d landing point and land the UAV once the low battery warning is received

(approximately 30% of the battery's maximum charge).

15. The UAV shall remain clear and yield the right of way to all other manned operations

and activities at all times (including, but not limited to, ultralight vehicles, parachute

activities, parasailing activities, hang gliders, etc.).MC Consultants, Inc.

2055 Corte del Nogal 03 / 20 /2015

Carlsbad, CA 92011 Page 9 of 14

16. The UAS will not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

17. Flights will be operated at an alti tude of no more than 400 feet AGL and will never

enter navigable controlled airspace.

18. Flights will be operated at a lateral distance of at least 200 feet from any

nonparticipating persons, unless that person is in a position where he or she is

shielded fr om the UAS and any possible debris resulting from UAS failure.

19. At no time will the UAS be operated so close to persons or objects to present an

undue hazard to the PIC or Observer, pursuant to § 91.119(a).

20. UAS operations will occur at least 200 feet away from non

- participating vehicles or

structures unless the property owner/controller has granted permission

, and the PIC

has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects. At no

time will the UAS be operated so close to structur es or vehicles as to present an

undue hazard to the PIC or Observer, per § 91.119(a).

21. Flights will be limited to a speed of 30 knots and vertical ascent / decent will be limited

to 15 fps.

22. If the UAS lose s communication with the PIC, the UAS has the capability to return to a

pre

- determined location within the operational area and land safely.

23. Contingency plans will be in place to safely terminate flight if there is a loss of

communication between the PIC and the Observer.

24. The UAS will have the capability to safely abort flight in the case of unpredicted

obstacles or emergencies. The PIC will abort the flight in the event of unpredicted

obstacles or emergencies in accordance with the MC’s Flight Operations Manua ls.

SECTION 6: REGULATIONS FROM W HICH EXEMPTION IS REQUESTED

The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA the authority to issue exemptions. This

statutory authority, by its terms, includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined under

§ 40101 of the Act, including UASs, fr om its safety regulations and minimum standards when

the Administrator decides a requested exemption is in the public interest.

MC seeks an exemption from several interrelated provisions of Title 14 of the Code of

Federal Regulations ("14 C.F.R") Parts 21 , 45, 61 and 91 for purposes of conducting the

requested operations using a UAS. Listed below are the specific sections of 14 C.F.R for

which exemption is sought.

A. 14 C. F .R. P a rt 21, Subp a rt H

– Air w o r th i n e ss C e r t ific a tes a nd 14 C. F .R. § 91.20

The FAA has stated that no exemption is needed from this section if a finding is made under

the Reform Act that the UAS selected provides an equivalent level of safety when compared

to aircraft normally used for the same appl ication. These criteria are met, and th erefore no

exemption is needed. See Grant of Exemption to Astraeus Aerial, Docket N o. FAA

- 2014

-

0352 at 13

- 14, 22. If, however, the FAA determines that there are some characteristics of the

chosen UAS that fail to meet the requirements of the Reform Act, a n exemption is r e qu e sted.MC Consultants, Inc.

2055 Corte del Nogal 03 / 20 /2015

Carlsbad, CA 92011 Page 10 of 14

B. 14 C. F .R. P a rt 27 A irwo r th i n e ss S tand a rds: No r mal C a te g o r y Rotor c r a ft

Title 14 C.F.R. Part 27 sets forth the procedural requirements for airworthiness certification of

normal category ro torcraft. To the extent that MC’s small UASs would otherwise require

certification under Part 27, Petitioner seeks an exemption from Part 27's airworthiness

standards for the same reasons identified in the request for exemption from 14 C.F.R. Part

21, Subpart H, supra.

C. 14 C. F .R. § 91.7 (a ): C i v il Air c r a ft Ai r wo r th i n e ss

MC seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a), which requires that a civil aircraft be in

airworthy condition to be operated. The FAA has stated that no exemption is required for 14

C.F.R. § 91.7(a) to the extent that the requir ements of Part 21 are waived or found

inapplicable. See Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0352 at 13

- 14, 22. Accordingly, Petitioner requests

that the requirements for § 91.7(a) be treated in accordance with Section V(A), supra.

D. 14 C. F .R. § 91.9 ( b ) (2 ) : C iv i l Air c r a ft F l i g ht Man u a l i n the A ir c r a ft a nd 14 C. F .R. §

91.203 (a ) a nd ( b ) : C a r r y i n g Civ i l Air c raft Ce r t i fi ca t i on a nd R e g is t r a t i on

MC seeks exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.9(b)(2). Given the small size and configuration of

the UAS, it would be impossible to keep airworthiness documents and other aircraft manuals

on board the UAS because there is simply no room and the UAS has no cabin or cockpit.

E. 14 C. F .R. §§ 91.9 (c ), 45

. 23(b) a nd 45.27 ( a ): Ai r c r a ft M a rki n g a nd I d e nt i fi ca t i on

R e quir e m e nts

MC seeks an exemption from the aircraft marking and identification requirements contained

in 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.9(c), 45.23(b) and 45.27(a).

14 C.F.R. § 91.9(c), Civil Aircraft Flight Manual, Marking and Placard requirements, provides

that: No person may operate a U.S.

- registered civil aircraft unless that aircraft is identified in

accordance with Part 45 of this chapter.

14 C.F.R. § 45.23(b), Markings of the Aircraft, states: When marks include only the Roman

capital letter "N" and the registration number is displayed on limited , restricted or light

- sport

category aircraft or experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the operator must also

display on that aircraft near each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not

less than 2 inches nor more tha n 6 inches high, the words "limited," "restricted," "light

- sport,

"experimental," or "provisional," as applicable.

14 C.F.R. § 45.27(a), Rotorcraft, states: Each operator of a rotorcraft must display on that

rotorcraft horizontally on both surfaces of the cabin, fuselage, boom, or tail the marks

required by § 45.23.

In a previous Grant of Exemption, the FAA determined that exemption from these

requirements was warranted provided that the aircraft "have identification (N

- Number)

markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R Part 45, Subpart C if the markings are as large as

practicable." FAA Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0352.MC Consultants, Inc.

2055 Corte del Nogal 03 / 20 /2015

Carlsbad, CA 92011 Page 11 of 14

F. 14 C. F .R. § 91.103: P r e fli g ht A c t i on

MC seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.103, which requires a PIC to become familiar

with specific informatio n before each flight, including information contained in the FAA

approved Flight Manual on board the aircraft. While the PIC will be familiar with all

information necessary to safely conduct the flight, an exemption is requested to the extent

that an FAA

- approved Flight Manual is required.

G. 14 C. F .R. § 91.119: Min i mum S a fe Alt i tudes

MC seeks an exemption from the minimum safe altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R.

§ 91.119. Section 91.119 prescribes the minimum safe altitudes under which aircraft may not

operate, including 500 feet above the surface and away from any person, vessel, vehicle, or

structure in non

- congested areas. See 14 C.F.R. § 91.119(c). Section 91.119(d) allows for a

helicopter to operate at less than those minimum altitudes when it can b e operated "without

hazard to persons or property on the surface," provided that "each person operating the

helicopter complies with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the

FAA."

An exemption is required because the proposed UAS operations will occur below 400 feet

AGL. Additionally, due the nature of the proposed operations, the Pilot and/or Observers(s)

may need to be less than 500 feet away from the UAS.

H. 14 C. F .R. § 91.121: Al t i met e r Settin g s

MC seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.121, which requires a person operating an

aircraft to maintain cruising altitude or flight level by reference to an altimeter that is set to the

elevation of the departure airport or barometric pressure. An exemption is required to the

exten t that the UASs do not have a barometric altimeter, but rather GPS altitude display.

I. 14 C. F .R. § 91.151 (a ): Fuel R e quir e ments for F l i g ht i n V F R Condi t ions

MC seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a)'s fuel requirements for flight in VFR

conditions. The technological limitations on UAS battery power means that no meaningful

flight operations can be conducted while still maintaining a 30

- minute battery reserve. An

exemption from the fuel requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a) is therefore required.

Addi tional information: Individual MC Flight operations will be limited 15 minutes or less.

J. 14 C. F .R. § 91.405 (a ), 9 1.407 (a ) ( 1 ), 91

. 409(a) ( 1) a nd ( 2 ); 91.417 ( a ) a nd ( b ) :

Mainten a n c e I nspe c t i ons

MC seeks an exemption from the maintenance inspection requirements contained in

14 C.F.R. § 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2); 91.417(a) and (b). These regulations

specify maintenance and inspection standards in reference to 14 C.F.R. Part 43. See, e.g.,

14 C.F.R. § 91.405(a) (stating that each owner or operator of an aircraft "[s]hall have the

aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required

inspections ...have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter"). An

exemption from these regulations is ne eded because Part 43 and these sections only apply

to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, which the UAS to be operated under this grant of

exemption will not have.MC Consultants, Inc.

2055 Corte del Nogal 03 / 20 /2015

Carlsbad, CA 92011 Page 12 of 14

K. 14 C. F .R. P a rt 61, 14 C. F .R. § 61.3, 14 C. F .R. § 61.113: P riv a te P i lot P rivile g e s and

L i m i t a t i o n s

61.113: subsections (a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part:

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) of an

aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that person,

for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft.

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with

any business or employment if

-

(1) The flight is only incidental to that bus iness or employment; and

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

MC seeks exemption from 14 CFR § 61.113, which restricts private pilot certificate holders

from flying aircraft for compensation or hire, and would also require a second class medical

certificate. The purpose of Part 61 is to ensure that the skill and competency of any PIC

matches the airspace in which the PIC will be operating, as well as requiring certifications if

the private pilot is carrying pass engers or cargo for hire. In this case, while the UASs will be

operated as part of a commercial operation, it carries neither passengers nor cargo. In the

Grant of Exemption to Astraeus Aerial17, the FAA determined that the unique characteristics

of UAS op eration outside of controlled airspace did not warrant the addition cost and

restrictions attendant with requiring a the PIC to have a Commercial Pilot Certificate and

Class II Medical Certificate. The fulfillment of the additional requirements for a priva te pilot to

become qualified as a commercial pilot would not lead to any additional safety benefits when

UAS operations are involved. Furthermore, while helpful, a pilot license will not ensure

remote control piloting skills. The risks associated with the operation of small UAS is far less

than the risks associated with the commercial activities outlined in 14 CFR § 61.113 (a) & (b).

SECTION 7: PRIVACY

All MC UAS operations will be conducted in accordance with applicable federal, state, or local

laws regarding privacy. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled

- access property with permission from the land/building owner/controller or authorized representative.

Permission from land owner/controller or authorized representative will b e obtained for each

flight to be conducted. Notification of inspection activities (including UAS operations) will be

delivered via land/building owner/controller or authorized representative a minimum of 24

hours prior to inspection day/UAS operations.

SE CTION 8: PUBLIC INTEREST

The public interest will be served by granting MC’s Petition for Exemption. Congress has

established a national policy that favors early integration of UAS into the NAS in controlled,

safe working environments such as those propos ed in this Petition. Granting this Petition for

Exemption helps fulfill Congress' goal in passing Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform

Act

— the FAA Administrator's assessment of whether certain UAS may operate safely in the

NAS before completion of the statutorily required rulemaking. The proposed UAS operations

in this Petition for Exemption significantly improve safety and reduce risk by alleviating the

public's exposure to danger associated with traditional aerial survey and inspection methods,MC Consultants, Inc.

2055 Corte del Nogal 03 / 20 /2015

Carlsbad, CA 92011 Page 13 of 14

namely , full size fixed

- wing aircraft and rotorcraft as well as the use of inherently dangerous

equipment use such as scaffolding and aerial work platforms . The UASs that MC intends to

use weight less than 3 pounds (DJI Phantom 2 Vision+) and less than 7 pounds (DJI Inspire

1), are battery powered, and create no emissions. Moreover, in the unlikely event that one of

Petitioner's UASs crash, there i s no fuel to ignite and explode. Any accident involving

Petitioner's lightweight UASs will present significantly less danger to the pilot and other

individuals on the ground than one involving a full size aircraft or significantly larger UAS.

Furthermore, MC’s UASs will be capable of documenting conditions that may have been

otherwise inaccessible using traditional inspe ction and survey methods. UAS

- assisted

photography will also reduce the risk of harm to inspecting engineers and consultants by not

exposing them to hazards associated with inspection of dangerous or unsafe physical

conditions often present in buildings an d structures that have been damaged

.

SECTION 9: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

MC seeks exemption from the following rules in Title 14 of the Code of Federal

Regulations: 14 C.F.R. 21, subpart H; 14 C.P.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113 (a) & (b); 14

C.F.R. § 91.7 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b)(2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.103(b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.109; 14

C.F.R. § 91.119; 14 C.F.R. § 91.121; 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a); 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.203(a) and (b);

14 C.F.R. § 91.405 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.407 (a)(1); 14 C.P.R. § 91.409 (a)(2); 14 C. P.R. §

91.409 (a)(2); and, 14 C.P.R. §§ 91.417 (a) & (b) to commercially operate lightweight

unmanned UAS during forensic evaluations and building condition assessments.

Granting MC Consultants request for exemption will reduce current risk levels and the reby

enhance safety. UAS technologies applied to building inspection services will provide higher

level of efficiency and safer services for our clients. Forensic evaluations and building

condition assessments performed by MC often involve the physical ins pection of outdoor

structures and facilities for the assessment of current element condition, damage, defects

and accidents. O btaining images of certain physical features may not be feasible due to

dangerous conditions, limited access on the structure or t he excessive height of the required

viewing angle.

The use of UAS

- assisted photography will provide a practical means to perform forensic

evaluations and building condition assessments that would be otherwise unsafe to the

employees of MC and the general public

. UAS

- assisted photography also offers a safer and

more efficient means to perform forensic evaluations and building condition assessments.

The use of this technology will better serve clients and improve public safety

.

MC Consultants respectfully r equests that the FAA grant its exemption request without delay.

The FAA has the authority to issue the exemption sought by MC Consultants pursuant to the

Federal Aviation Act, 85 P.L. 726 (1958), as amended (the “Act”).

Respectfully submitted,

Kai Loedel

Chief Operating Officer

MC Consultants, Inc.

2055 Corte del Nogal

Carlsbad, CA 92011MC Consultants, Inc.

2055 Corte del Nogal 03 / 20 /2015

Carlsbad, CA 92011 Page 14 of 14

The following attached items contain proprietary and commercial information exempt from

disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 522 et seq., and shoul d be held

in a separate file pu rsuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.35(b).

Attachments:

1. MC Consultants, Inc.:

a. MC

_ U AS

_ F l i g ht

_ O p e r a t i ons_ Manu a l _v1.0

2. D J I P h a ntom 2 Vision+ :

a. Phantom_2_Vision_P lus_Pilot_Training_Guide_v1.1

b. Phantom_2_ Vision_Plus_Quick_Start_Guide

c. Phantom_2 _Vision_Plus_User_Manual_v1.8

d. Smart_Flight_Battery_Safety_Guidelines

3. DJI Inspire 1:

a. Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1.0

b. Inspire_1_Safety_Guidelines

c. Ins pire_1_Maintenance_ManualV1.0

d. 1345_Prop eller_Locks_Quick_Start_Guide

e. Intelligent_Fli ght_Battery_Safety_GuidelinesFlight Operations Manual (v1.0) www.mc2consultantsinc.com

MC Consultants Flight Operations Manual (v1.0)

1. GENERAL PROTOCOL :

1.1. Review and consult the UAS manufacturers manuals:

1.1.1. D J I P h a ntom 2 Vision+ :

1.1.1.1. Phantom_2_Vision_Plus_Pilot_Training_Guide_v1.1

1.1.1.2. Phantom_2_Vision_Plus_Quick_Start_Guide

1.1.1.3. Phantom_2_Vision_Plus_User_Manual_v1.8

1.1.1.4. Smart_Flight_Battery_Safety_Guidelines

1.1.2. DJI Inspire 1:

1.1.2.1. Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1.0

1.1.2.2. Inspire_1_Safety_Guidelines

1.1.2.3. Ins pire_1_Maintenance_Manual_v 1.0

1.1.2.4. 1345_Propeller_Locks_Quick_Start_Guide

1.1.2.5. Intelligent_Flight_Battery_Safety_Guidelines

1.2. Mini m um c re w f or e ac h op e r a t i on shall c onsist of a pi l ot, who will be P i l o t

- in Com m a nd

( " P I C ") of the U A S

, a nd one o r mo r e Visu a l Obs e rvers ( " VO " ) a s n ece ss a r y to sa fe l y

c on d u c t t he m i ss i on

1.3. The U A S shall be o p e r a t e d with i n Visu a l L ine o f S i g ht (" V L OS " ) of the P IC a nd VO a t

all t i m e s. The P I C will use h uman vi s ion unaid e d b y a n y d e vi c e other than c o r r ec t ive

l e nses

1.4. The UAS shall be operated during daylight only. Operations shall occur during daytime

VFR Meteorological Conditions; flights under special visual flight rules ("SVFR") shall

not be conducted. UAS operations under Instrument Flight Rules, at night, or beyond

VLOS are prohibited

1.5. The Obs e r v e r d e s i g n a ted f or a n y op e r a t i on will be in consta n t vo i c e c ont a c t wi t h the

P I C

1.6. Prior to operation, PIC and VO are to prepare a Flight Plan setting forth the operational

limitations and condit ions for the flight operations and a description of any potential

hazards on or in the vicinity of the survey site

1.7. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast

weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the

intende d landing point and land the UA V once the low battery warning is received

(approximately 30% o f the battery's maximum charge)

1.8. The UAV shall remain clear and yield the right of way to all other manned operations

and activities at all times (including, but not limited to, ultralight vehicles, parachute

activities, parasailing activities, hang gliders, etc.)

1.9. The UAS shall not be operated by the PIC fr om any moving device or vehicle

1.10. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet AGL and will

never ente r navigable controlled airspace

1.11. Flights will be operated at a lateral distance of at least 200 feet from any

nonparticipating persons, unless that person is in a position where he or she is shielded

from the UAS and any possible de bris resulting from UAS failure

1.12. Warning signage shall be placed within 150 feet of UAV operations.

1.13. At no time shall the UAS be operated so close to pe rsons or objects to present

an undu e hazard to the PIC or ObserverFlight Operations Manual (v1.0) www.mc2consultantsinc.com

1.14. UAS operations shall occur at least 200 feet away from non

- participating vehicles

or structures unless the property owner/controller has granted permission, and the PIC

has made a safety as sessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects. At no

time shall the UAS be operated so close to structures or vehicles as to present an

undue hazard to the PIC or Observer

1.15. Flights shall be limited to a speed of 30 knots and vertical ascent / d ecent will be

limited to 15 fps

1.16. Contingency plan must be in place to safely terminate flight if there is a loss of

communication b etween the PIC and the Observer

1.17. The PIC shall abort flight in the case of unpredi cted obstacles or emergencies.

Refer to se cti on four below

2. PRE

- FLIGHT PROTOCOL:

2.1. Review local weather forecast

2.2. Inspect surroundings

2.2.1. Visually review the flight location and surroundings

2.2.2. Identify potential risks and challenges

2.2.2.1. Vicinity of public safety helipads/heliports

2.2.2.2. Vicinity of medical helipads/ helipor ts

2.2.2.3. Vicinity of airport(s)

2.2.2.4. Vicinity of light poles

2.2.2.5. Vicinity of utility poles/towers/lines

2.2.2.6. Vicinity of trees

2.2.2.7. Vicinity of elevated obstructions

2.2.2.8. Vicinity of roadways with moderate to heavy traffic

2.2.2.9. Flocks of birds that may cause interference and potentia lly impact flight

2.2.2.10. Public gatherings that may attract viewer

2.2.2.11. Identify optimal point of control to maintain direct line of sight at all times

2.2.2.12. Identify optimal point of home position and launch/land location

2.3. Place warning signage in appropriate locations

2.3.1. Place sign(s) that warn potential o bserves or bystanders in public spaces

2.3.1.1. Warning signs should state the following

“ATTENTION ! A ERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN PROGRESS.

FOR YOUR SAFETY PLEASE REMAIN 150 FEET BACK ”

2.4. Inspect UAS:

2.4.1. Verify that all batteries are in proper working condition

2.4.1.1. Visually inspect batteries for swelling, damage, or leakage

2.4.1.2. Verify that all batteries are fully charged

2.4.2. Verify that the UAV is in proper working condition

2.4.2.1. Visually inspect the propellers for warps, chips, and cracks

2.4.2.2. Visually inspect the UAV arms and body for damage /loose connectionsFlight Operations Manual (v1.0) www.mc2consultantsinc.com

3. FLIGHT PROTOCOL :

3.1. Install propellers and propeller locks (if applicable)

3.2. Install battery

3.3. Power on radio then power on UAV

3.4. Set geo

- fence that limits UAV flight path to the inspection location only

3.5. Visually inspect immediate and adjacent surroundings

3.6. Lift UAV approximately 4 feet off of ground and allow to hover in place

3.7. Verify that all system inputs are responding normally

3.8. Maneuver UAV in a slow controlled manner at all times

3.9. Restrict flight altitu de to a minimum elevation sufficient to acquire data

3.10. Remain alert to surroundings including the following:

3.10.1. Approaching people and vehicles

3.10.1.1. VO shall deflect all distraction from PIC

3.10.2. Birds

3.10.3. Manned aircraft

3.10.4. Changes in wind speed and direction

3.10.5. Location of the sun

3.10.6. Changes in cloud coverage

3.11. Land UAV in same location as take off

4. UNPREDICTED OBSTACLES OR EMERGENCIES

4.1. If at any time the PIC or VO observes or encounters an unpredicted obstacle, the PIC

shall immediately land the UAV in a safe location

4.2. T he PIC may increase or decrease altitude based on the location of the unpredicted

obstacle to avoid the obstacle

4.3. If an unpredicted obstacle is identified during normal flight, the PIC shall return the

UAV to its home position to further identify the challe nge and create a new flight plan

4.4. If the UAV begins to act in an unpredictable manner then the PIC shall land the UAV

immediately

5. POST

- FLIGHT PROTOCOL

5.1. Shut down UAS

5.2. Remove propellers

5.3. Allow all batteries and UAV to cool down

5.4. Place batteries, transmitter(s), propellers, and accessories into carrying case

5.5. Log flight time and any conditions that changed during flight

5.6. Charge batteries pursuant to manufacturers recommendations

5.7. Ensure that all systems have the most current version of firmware/software installed

6. FLIGHT LOGS:

6.1. The PIC must maintain flight and maintenance logs using the forms below:Flight Log (v1.0) www.mc2consultantsinc.com

MC Consultants Flight Operations Flight L og (v1.0)

Pilot in Charge :

Visual Observer :

Date :

Project Name:

Project Number:

Location:

Weather Conditions:

UAS:

Flight Plan:

Challenges:

Flight Notes:

Pre

- Flight Checklist: Inspect surroundings

Note flight plan

Note challenges

Place warning signage

Inspect UAS

Inspect batteries

Tighten props / install prop locks

Inspect/tighten all connections

Review flight plan

Place warning signage

Set geo

- fence (if applicable)

Test control inputsMaintenance Log (v1.0) www.mc2consultantsinc.com

MC Consultants Flight Operations Maintenance Log (v1.0)

Maintenance Performed by:

UAS: DJI Inspire 1 Identification Number

Date: Notes:

Checklist: Inspect UAS

Inspect camera

Inspect batteries

Inspect cables

Inspect charger

Tighten all connections

Inspect propellers

Update software

Update firmware

Calibrate IMU

Calibrate compass

Test control inputs

Charge batteries

Additional Notes:Flight Operations Manual (v1.0) www.mc2consultantsinc.com

MC Consultants Flight Operations Maintenance Log (v1.0)

Maintenance Performed by:

UAS: DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ Identification Number

Date: Notes:

Checklist: Inspect UAS

Inspect camera

Inspect batteries

Inspect cables

Inspect charger

Tighten all connections

Inspect propellers

Update software

Update firmware

Calibrate IMU

Calibrate compass

Test control inputs

Charge batteries

Additional Notes: