alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-96-16 May 9, 1996

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 708/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 708/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

FERMI PLANT RATED "SUPERIOR" IN ONE AREA, "GOOD" IN TWO AREAS,

"ADEQUATE" IN ONE AREA IN LATEST SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

The Fermi Nuclear Power Plant has received performance

ratings of "superior" in plant support, "good" in maintenance and

engineering and "adequate" in operations in the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission staff's latest Systematic Assessment of

Licensee Performance (SALP) for the facility.

The SALP report was sent May 8 to Detroit Edison Company,

which operates the plant in Monroe, Michigan. It evaluates the

plant's performance from April 2, 1994, through March 20 of this

year.

NRC and Detroit Edison Company officials will discuss the

assessment during a meeting set for 10 a.m. May 21 at the Monroe

County Courthouse, 106 E. First Street in Monroe, Michigan. The

meeting will be open for public observation. NRC officials will

be available afterwards to speak with reporters, state and local

officials, and members of the public.

NRC systematic assessment reports rate licensees in four

functional areas - plant operations, maintenance, engineering,

and plant support - and assign ratings of Category 1, 2 or 3

depending on whether their performance in those areas was

superior, good or adequate. The report on Fermi gives a

"Category 1" rating in plant support, indicating superior

performance. It assigns a "Category 2" rating in both

maintenance and engineering, indicating good performance. It

assigns a "Category 3" rating in operations, indicating adequate

performance with improvements needed.

NRC Regional Administrator Hubert J. Miller, in a letter to

the utility, said: "...conduct of nuclear activities at Fermi,

while good overall, showed little improvement when compared to

the last SALP period."

Mr. Miller added:

"While safety related equipment continues to be well
maintained, plant housekeeping was strong and some improvements

were made in balance of plant (BOP) equipment, a number of major

BOP equipment problems routinely challenged operators. Most

performance problems were self-revealing or identified by NRC.

One of Fermi's major challenges will be implementing an effective

problem identification and corrective action program."

The ratings for each functional area of this report and the

previous report were:

Functional Area Current Period Previous Period

Operations 3 3

Maintenance 2 2

Engineering 2 2

Plant Support 1 1

####

(Note: A copy of the full report may be obtained from the Region

III Office of Public Affairs at the telephone numbers or e-mail

address above.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT PIERCE DIVISION

SHERRY JENKINS,

Plaintiff, 

v. CASE NO.: 2:20-CV-14242 

PIPER AIRCRAFT, INC.,

Defendant.

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

The parties hereby stipulate that, pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all claims 

and causes of action may be dismissed upon the merits, with prejudice and without costs to either 

party. 

Dated this 7th day of January, 2021 

/s/ Jesse R. Dill

Jesse R. Dill, Esq. 

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,

SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

Wisconsin Bar No. 1061704 

1243 North 10th Street, Suite 200 

Milwaukee, WI 53205 

Tel: (414) 239-6400 

Email: jesse.dill@ogletree.com

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

Thomas W. Tierney, Esq.

ROSSWAY SWAN TIERNEY BARRY 

& OLIVER, P.L. 

Florida Bar No. 390150 

The Modern One Building 

2101 Indian River Boulevard, Suite 200 

/s/ Bernard R. Mazaheri

Bernard R. Mazaheri, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 643971 

MAZAHERI & MAZAHERI

325 Shelby St. 

Frankfort, KY 40601 

Tel: (502) 475-8201 

Email: Bernie@thelaborfirm.com

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Case 2:20-cv-14242-KMM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

Vero Beach, FL 32960 Telephone: 

772-231-4440 

Email: ttierney@rosswayswan.com

Counsel for Defendant 

45409238.1

Case 2:20-cv-14242-KMM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 2 of 2
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsContents of the NASA ocean data system archive, version 11-90The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Ocean Data System (NODS) archive at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) includes satellite data sets for the ocean sciences and global-change research to facilitate multidisciplinary use of satellite ocean data. Parameters include sea-surface height, surface-wind vector, sea-surface temperature, atmospheric liquid water, and surface pigment concentration. NODS will become the Data Archive and Distribution Service of the JPL Distributed Active Archive Center for the Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS) and will be the United States distribution site for Ocean Topography Experiment (TOPEX)/POSEIDON data and metadata.Document ID19910007222Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSmith, Elizabeth A.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Lassanyi, Ruby A.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 15, 1990Subject CategoryOceanographyReport/Patent NumberJPL-PUBL-90-49NAS 1.26:187812NASA-CR-187812Accession Number91N16535Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 656-61-12-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS7-918Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910007222.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
INSPECTOR GENERAL’S SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS

Appalachian Regional Commission

April 1, 2007–September 30, 2007






HART

A L ABA M A

T ENNESSE E

K E N T U C K 

I LLI N O I S I N D I A N A

MISSISSIPPI

Appalachia, as defined in the legisl

authority, is a 200,000-square-mile 

New York to northern Mississippi. I

Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Miss

Tennessee, and Virginia.
HART

X

V

J

A

V

K

J

J

V

X-1

CHATTANOOG

COOKEVILLE

HUNTSVILLE

TUPELO

BIRMINGHAM

AT

NASHVILLE

MONTGOMERY

MEMPHIS

FRAN

INDIANAPOLIS

LEXINGTON

LOUISVILLE

A LABAMA

T ENNESSEE

K ENTUCKY

I LLINOIS I NDIANA

MISSISSIPPI

Open to Trac N








Appalachia, as defined in the legislation from which the Appalachian Regional Commission derives its 

authority, is a 200,000-square-mile region that follows the spine of the Appalachian Mountains from

southern New York to northern Mississippi. It includes all of West Virginia and parts of 12 other states:

Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, 

South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia.

Front cover: Photographs by Ann Hawthorne (top left) and Ken Murray. 

Appalachian Regional Commission

Office of Inspector General

1666 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 700

Washington, DC 20009-1068
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 9:20 AM

To: 'ebrown@lifedrone.co'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for additional informat ion: LifeDrone, LLC (FAA-2015-1368)



### June 16, 2015

Dear Mr. Brown:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-1368). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), m odel(s), and type(s)(i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) sh ould include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by June 30, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                                     6445871
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              4446487
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                 255368
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          13084029
<PP&E>                                     7607958
<DEPRECIATION>                             6463159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            14659409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      6725140
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     97665
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 7697194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              14659409
<SALES>                                    5110605
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           6528565
<CGS>                                       838398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1268457
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           4883165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           33634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             411244
<INCOME-TAX>                                 22340
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         388904
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                388904
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04


</TABLE>
### §1856. Waiver of rights

Agreements by employees purporting to waive or to modify their rights under this chapter shall be void as contrary to public policy, except that a waiver or modification of rights in favor of the Secretary shall be valid for purposes of enforcement of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 97–470, title V, §506, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2598.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days from Jan. 14, 1983, see section 524 of Pub. L. 97–470, set out as a note under section 1801 of this title.
#### Lonnie MATHIS, Jr., Petitioner, v. ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents.

No. 01-2380.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2002.

Decided May 29, 2002.

Roger D. Forman, Forman *&*Crane, L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for Petitioner. William S. Mattingly, Ashley M. Harman, Jackson & Kelly, P.L.L.C., Morgantown, West Virginia, for Respondents.

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Mathis, Jr., seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 *&*Supp.2001). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. *See Mathis v. Island Creek Coal Co.,*No. 01-210-BLA (BRB Oct. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
### §3361. References

#### (a) Workforce Investment Act of 1998 references

Except as otherwise specified, a reference in a Federal law to a provision of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2801 et seq.) shall be deemed to refer to the corresponding provision of this Act.

#### (b) Wagner-Peyser Act references

Except as otherwise specified, a reference in a Federal law to a provision of the Wagner-Peyser Act (29 U.S.C. 49 et seq.) shall be deemed to refer to the corresponding provision of such Act, as amended by this Act.

#### (c) Disability-related references

Except as otherwise specified, a reference in a Federal law to a provision of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 701 et seq.) shall be deemed to refer to the corresponding provision of such Act, as amended by this Act.

(Pub. L. 113–128, title V, §513, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1722.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 113–128, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1425, known as the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, which enacted this chapter, repealed chapter 30 (§2801 et seq.) of this title and chapter 73 (§9201 et seq.) of Title 20, Education, and made amendments to numerous other sections and notes in the Code. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of this title and Tables.

The Workforce Investment Act of 1998, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 105–220, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 936, and was repealed by Pub. L. 113–128, title V, §§506, 511(a), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1703, 1705, effective July 1, 2015. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

The Wagner-Peyser Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is act June 6, 1933, ch. 49, 48 Stat. 113, which is classified generally to chapter 4B (§49 et seq.) of this title and was amended extensively by title III of Pub. L. 113–128. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 49 of this title and Tables.

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, referred to in subsec. (c), is Pub. L. 93–112, Sept. 26, 1973, 87 Stat. 355, which is classified generally to chapter 16 (§701 et seq.) of this title and was amended extensively by title IV of Pub. L. 113–128. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 701 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
§ 301.2 Applicant eligibility. ( a ) An Eligible Applicant for EDA Investment Assistance is defined in § 300.3 of this chapter.
( b ) An Eligible Applicant that is a non-profit organization must include in its application for Investment Assistance a resolution passed by (or a letter signed by) an authorized representative of a general purpose political subdivision of a State, acknowledging that it is acting in cooperation with officials of such political subdivision. EDA, at its sole discretion, may waive this cooperation requirement for certain Projects of a significant Regional or national scope under part 306 or 307 of this chapter. *See* §§ 306.3(b), 306.6(b), and 307.5(b) of this chapter.
[71 FR 56675, Sept. 27, 2006, as amended at 82 FR 57053, Dec. 1, 2017]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     PLM EQUIPMENT GROWTH & INCOME FUND VII
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000895234
<NAME>    PLM EQUIPMENT GROWTH & INCOME FUND VII
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         6,589
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (37)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         71,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (33,265)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 62,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        20,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     39,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   62,428
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,690
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,231
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               113
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,094
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,183
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,183
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,183
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.71



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Anna Burlinson et al., Petitioners, and Taxpayers Organization of North East Yonkers, Inc., et al., Interveners, Petitioners, against Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Yonkers et al., Respondents, and Henry H. Sternberg, Intervener, Respondent.

*724The board of appeals had jurisdiction to entertain this second application for a variance. *(Matter of Reed*v. *Board of Standards & Appeals of City of N. Y.,*255 N. Y. 126, 133; *Ellsworth Realty Co.*v. *Kramer,*268 App. Div. 824.) Facts established by the record presented a situation in which the board of appeals had power to grant the relief sought. (General City Law, § 81, subd. 4; Amended Building Zone Ordinance of City of Yonkers, § 19, subd. [B]; *People ex rel. Helvetia Realty Co.*v. *Leo,*183 N. Y. S. 37, affd. 195 App. Div. 887, affd. 231 N. Y. 619.) The board of appeals, in the exercise of its discretion, has granted the variance, and this court may not, in the absence of arbitrary action by the board, overrule its determination. *(Matter of Levy*v. *Board of Standards & Appeals of City of N. Y.,*267 N. Y. 347, 351; *Matter of Reed*v. *Board of Standards & Appeals of City of N. Y.,*supra; *People ex rel. Sullivan*v. *McLaughlin,*266 N. Y. 519.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23323]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1549-DR]

Alabama; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1549-DR), dated September 15, 2004, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective October 8, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 15, 2004:

    Cleburne County for Public Assistance.
    Colbert, Cullman, Dale, Dekalb, Franklin, Lamar, Lawrence, Lee, 
Marion, Marshall, Pike, Tallapoosa, and Winston Counties for Public 
Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-23323 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
```
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINACIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Philip Gay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Grill Concepts, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 26, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Grill Concepts, Inc.








By:
/s/ Philip GayName: Philip GayTitle: EVP and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 9, 2004