alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 123.701 What is the application procedure for an IDAP loan?

A prospective IDAP Borrower must apply to an IDAP Lender for an IDAP loan by the application deadline for prospective IDAP Borrowers established by SBA in the IDAP-Eligible Disaster Declaration. If the IDAP Lender approves the application, it must submit a request for IDAP loan approval to SBA by the application deadline for IDAP Lenders established by SBA in the IDAP-Eligible Disaster Declaration. SBA will issue an approval or a decline of the IDAP Lender's request within 36 hours of receipt by SBA. A prospective IDAP Borrower will receive notice of approval or decline of its loan application from the IDAP Lender. Notice of decline will include the reasons. If an IDAP loan is approved, a loan authorization will be issued.
#### Morton Kamerman, an Infant, by David Kamerman, his Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Port Sales Corporation of Nassau County, Respondent.

No opinion. In affirming the judgment we do not intend to indicate that defendant may keep the boat and also full payment therefor. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Drive Badlands Loop Road (Highway 240)

Badlands National Park
```

[109th Congress Public Law 25]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ025.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 368]]

Public Law 109-25
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
4960 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the ``Ray 
 Charles Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 12, 2005 -  [H.R. 504]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4960 
West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Ray Charles Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ray Charles Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved July 12, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 504:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Apr. 20, considered and passed House.
            June 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5116 

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to require the authorization 

of frozen fruits and vegetables under the special supplemental nutrition 

program for women, infants, and children. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2022 

Mr. MARSHALL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to require the 

authorization of frozen fruits and vegetables under the 

special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5116 IS

1 SECTION 1. FROZEN FRUITS AND VEGETABLES UNDER THE 

2 SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION PRO3 GRAM FOR WOMEN, INFANTS, AND CHIL4 DREN. 

5 Section 17(f)(11) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 

6 (42 U.S.C. 1786(f)(11)) is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following: 

8 ‘‘(D) FROZEN FRUITS AND VEGETA9 BLES.—In the regulations prescribed under 

10 subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall require a 

11 State agency to make available under the pro12 gram frozen fruits and frozen vegetables.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60894-60895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22889]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Advanced Television Systems Committee, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Advanced Television Systems 
Committee, Inc. (``ATSC'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing

[[Page 60895]]

(1) the name and principal place of business of the standards 
development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards 
development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
involving the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actural damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business is: Advanced Television Systems Committee, Inc., 
Washington, DC. The nature and scope of ATSC's standards development 
activities are: Coordinating television standards among different 
communications media, focusing on digital television, interactive 
systems and broadband multimedia communications; developing digital 
television implementation strategies; and presenting educational 
seminars on the ATSC standards.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-22889 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 127.401 What are a WOSB's and EDWOSB's ongoing obligations to SBA?

Once certified, a WOSB or EDWOSB must notify SBA of any material changes that could affect its eligibility within 30 calendar days of any such change. Material change includes, but is not limited to, a change in the ownership, business structure, or management. The notification must be in writing and must be uploaded into the concern's profile with SBA. The method for notifying SBA can be found on *https://certify.sba.gov.* A concern's failure to notify SBA of such a material change may result in decertification and removal from SAM and DSBS (or any successor system) as a designated certified WOSB/EDWOSB concern. In addition, SBA may seek the imposition of penalties under § 127.700.

[85 FR 27663, May 11, 2020]
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE  CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT
 THIS AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WILLBROS USA, INC. MICHAEL F. CURRAN
 WITNESSETH:
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 1. Termination of Agreement and Relationship .
 2. Continuation of Payments .




---



##### 



Agreement to Terminate
Consulting Services Agreement
11th September 2007
Page
  3. Group Medical Plan .
 4. Taxes .
 5. Resignations .
 6. Indemnification .




---



##### 



Agreement to Terminate
Consulting Services Agreement
11th September 2007
Page
 7. Confidentiality
 8. Solicitation of Employees
 9. Notices
 If to Willbros:
    
    Willbros USA, Inc.4400 Post Oak ParkwaySuite 1000Houston, Texas 77027Facsimile:
    
    (713) 403-8074Attention:
    
    John (Jay) T. DaltonSenior Vice President & General CounselIf to Consultant:
    
    Michael F. Curran2207 Del MonteHouston, Texas 77019Facsimile: (713) 523-3586
 10. Prior Rights .
 11. Governing Law




---



##### 



Agreement to Terminate
Consulting Services Agreement
11th September 2007
Page
 12. Entire Agreement and Waiver
 13. Facsimile Signatures; Counterparts
 14. Authorization .
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 CONSULTANT
    
    
    
    WILLBROSWillbros USA, Inc./s/
Michael F. Curran 
Michael F. Curran
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Dennis G. Berryhill 
Dennis G. Berryhill
Vice President and Secretary
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RemoteMDx, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David G. Derrick, Chief Executive
Officer and Michael G. Acton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                                        /s/David G. Derrick
                                       --------------------------
                                       David G. Derrick
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
                                       RemoteMDx, Inc.



                                        /s/Michael G. Acton
                                       --------------------------
                                       Michael G. Acton
                                       Chief Financial Officer



Dated: January 13, 2004
No: IV-24-008 April 5, 2024

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128

NRC Proposes $45,000 Civil Penalty Against International Isotopes

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed an $45,000 civil penalty against 

International Isotopes of Idaho Falls, Idaho, for violations of NRC requirements associated with the 

import and transfer of radioactive materials. The violations were documented in a December 2023 

inspection report. 

International Isotopes uses radioactive materials in the manufacture of devices for medical 

and industrial applications. 

The violations had no adverse impact on the health and safety of the public. 

The NRC held a regulatory conference with company representatives at its Region IV office 

in Arlington, Texas, on January 30. It issued its enforcement decision after reviewing the 

circumstances surrounding the proposed violations and considering any actions the company may 

have taken to comply with NRC regulations. 

The company has 30 days to pay the fine, dispute it, or request involvement from a neutral 

third-party mediator to resolve the issue.
No: I-24-001 January 29, 2024 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector

at Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Christopher Kline as 

the senior resident inspector at the Nine Mile Point nuclear power plant in 

Scriba, New York. He joins Resident Inspector Beth Sienel at the two-unit site, 

which is operated by Constellation Energy. 

“During his time at Nine Mile Point, Christopher has developed a solid 

working knowledge of the plant,” said NRC Region I Administrator Ray 

Lorson. “Combined with his decades of service with the nuclear Navy, he is 

eminently qualified to take on this role.” 

Kline joined the NRC in January 2021 at the agency’s Region I Office in King of Prussia, 

Pennsylvania. He began serving as a resident inspector at Nine Mile Point in September 2021 and 

more recently has been working as the acting senior resident inspector at the Columbia nuclear 

power plant in Washington State. 

Previously, he served as an officer in the Navy for 31 years. His most recent assignment was 

as a deputy submarine commander in Silverdale, Washington. 

He holds a bachelor’s degree in nautical science from the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy.

Each operating U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident 

inspectors who serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, 

monitoring safety-significant projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident 

inspectors can serve at a reactor site for up to seven years.
### §1862. Authority to obtain information

#### (a) Investigation and inspection authority concerning places, records, etc.

To carry out this chapter the Secretary, either pursuant to a complaint or otherwise, shall, as may be appropriate, investigate, and in connection therewith, enter and inspect such places (including housing and vehicles) and such records (and make transcriptions thereof), question such persons and gather such information to determine compliance with this chapter, or regulations prescribed under this chapter.

#### (b) Attendance and testimony of witnesses, and production of evidence; subpena authority

The Secretary may issue subpenas requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses or the production of any evidence in connection with such investigations. The Secretary may administer oaths, examine witnesses, and receive evidence. For the purpose of any hearing or investigation provided for in this chapter, the authority contained in sections 49 and 50 of title 15, relating to the attendance of witnesses and the production of books, papers, and documents, shall be available to the Secretary. The Secretary shall conduct investigations in a manner which protects the confidentiality of any complainant or other party who provides information to the Secretary in good faith.

#### (c) Prohibited activities

It shall be a violation of this chapter for any person to unlawfully resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with any official of the Department of Labor assigned to perform an investigation, inspection, or law enforcement function pursuant to this chapter during the performance of such duties.

(Pub. L. 97–470, title V, §512, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2598.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days from Jan. 14, 1983, see section 524 of Pub. L. 97–470, set out as a note under section 1801 of this title.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No: II-99-37 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Wednesday, June 23, 1999)

NRC STAFF SCHEDULES PUBLIC MEETING IN CHATTANOOGA JUNE 28

TO DESCRIBE NEW INSPECTION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

TVA’s Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant Is One of Nine Participating In Pilot

Program

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting

in Chattanooga on the evening of Monday, June 28 to describe a new pilot

inspection and assessment program being conducted at the Tennessee Valley

Authority’s Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant.

The meeting will begin at 6:00 p.m. (EDT) in the NRC’s Technical

Training Center at Chattanooga, located at 5746 Marlin Road, Suite 200, in

the Eastgate Shopping Center, located where Interstate 75 and Interstate 24

converge. It will be open to observation by interested members of the

public, and NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to take

questions and comments from those who attend.

Sequoyah is one of nine commercial nuclear power plants participating

in a trial, six-month NRC pilot program which began June 1 to test and

evaluate a new inspection and assessment program intended for use by the NRC

staff at all 103 of the nation’s commercial nuclear power reactors next

year.

The NRC developed the new reactor inspection and assessment program in

order to use its resources more effectively and efficiently. NRC officials

said the new program reflects improvements in nuclear power plant safety

performance over the past 20 years and that plants that perform well will

have less regulatory oversight than plants that have problems.

The new program will continue to utilize “baseline” inspections at all

licensed, commercial nuclear power plants with NRC resident inspectors on

site, supplemented by specialists from one of four NRC regional offices

and/or the agency’s headquarters in Washington, D.C. If performance

declines at a plant, NRC regulatory activities for that facility will

increase.

The new assessment program will focus in part on common “performance

indicators” which provide information on how well a plant is performing.

NRC inspectors will also monitor a number of plant activities that are not

measured by the indicators. Inspections will pay particular attention to

how well the plant’s staff finds and corrects problems.

The pilot program includes, in addition to Sequoyah, Hope Creek and

Salem in New Jersey, Fitzpatrick in New York, Prairie Island in Minnesota,

Quad Cities in Illinois, Shearon Harris in North Carolina, and Fort Calhoun

and Cooper in Nebraska.
A full description of the program is available on the NRC’s internet

web site at: http//www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm. Questions also may be

addressed to opa@nrc.gov.
### §171. Declaration of purpose and policy

It is the policy of the United States that—

(a) sound and stable industrial peace and the advancement of the general welfare, health, and safety of the Nation and of the best interests of employers and employees can most satisfactorily be secured by the settlement of issues between employers and employees through the processes of conference and collective bargaining between employers and the representatives of their employees;

(b) the settlement of issues between employers and employees through collective bargaining may be advanced by making available full and adequate governmental facilities for conciliation, mediation, and voluntary arbitration to aid and encourage employers and the representatives of their employees to reach and maintain agreements concerning rates of pay, hours, and working conditions, and to make all reasonable efforts to settle their differences by mutual agreement reached through conferences and collective bargaining or by such methods as may be provided for in any applicable agreement for the settlement of disputes; and

(c) certain controversies which arise between parties to collective-bargaining agreements may be avoided or minimized by making available full and adequate governmental facilities for furnishing assistance to employers and the representatives of their employees in formulating for inclusion within such agreements provision for adequate notice of any proposed changes in the terms of such agreements, for the final adjustment of grievances or questions regarding the application or interpretation of such agreements, and other provisions designed to prevent the subsequent arising of such controversies.

(June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title II, §201, 61 Stat. 152.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Executive Order No. 11482

Ex. Ord. No. 11482, Sept. 22, 1969, 34 F.R. 14723, which related to the Construction Industry Collective Bargaining Commission, was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 12110, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1069, formerly set out as a note under section 1013 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Executive Order No. 11849

Ex. Ord. No. 11849, Apr. 1, 1975, 40 F.R. 14887, which related to the Collective Bargaining Committee in Construction, was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 12110, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1069, formerly set out as a note under section 1013 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

HON. ROY K. ALTMAN 

ORDER RE-SCHEDULING STATUS CONFERENCES 

 A status conference session has been scheduled to consider various matters before the 

Court. The Plaintiffs’ Complaint alleges violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (the 

“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 203 or the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the “TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. 

§ 227. Consistent with the Court’s practices in these cases, counsel shall appear at a status 

conference on Wednesday, September 30, 2020. Matters scheduled for consideration at this 

session are listed below with corresponding times. The conference will be conducted 

telephonically. At that time, the parties shall dial 1-888-363-4734 and enter access code 

9127026, followed by the # symbol. Counsel must not utilize speakerphone functionality during 

the hearing. If possible, counsel should use a landline. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS

as follows: 

1. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file this Order in each of the below cases. 

2. The parties are not personally required to appear, but a representative of each 

party with full authority to enter a full compromise must appear. 

3. If an agreement is reached, the parties shall promptly notify the Court. 

4. The Plaintiff’s counsel must appear with the entire case file. If any of the 

Defendants have not yet appeared, the Plaintiff must serve a copy of this 

Order on any such Defendant within two business days of the date of this 

Order. 

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2020 Page 1 of 3
2 

5. Counsel are ORDERED to dial in ten minutes before their designated call-in 

time—and to confer with opposing counsel beforehand to confirm mutual 

attendance. 

a. 20-cv-61562 – Vassor v. Harkham Shipping, LLC

i. Call-in time: 2:00 p.m.

b. 20-cv-61352 – Lima et al. v. Westmoreland Protection Agency, Inc. et al.

i. Call-in time: 2:10 p.m.

c. 19-cv-62848 – Hearns v. All Dade Pumbing, Inc. et al.

i. Call-in time: 2:20 p.m.

d. 20-cv-61761 – Newton v. P.D.K.N. Holdings, LLC, et al.

i. Call-in time: 2:30 p.m.

e. 20-cv-61475 – Walowitz v. Corporate Coaches Inc. et al.

i. Call-in time: 2:40 p.m.

f. 20-cv-81558 – Florvil v. Hunters Run Property Owners Association, Inc.

i. Call-in time: 2:50 p.m.

g. 20-cv-61588 – Martinez v. Total Solution Professional Services Inc. et al.

i. Call-in time: 3:00 p.m.

h. 20-cv-61248 – Charles-Pierre v. Millennium Steel, Inc. et al.

i. Call-in time: 3:10 p.m.

i. 20-cv-61699 – Sosa v. JABA Pro Stone Corp. et al.

i. Call-in time: 3:20 p.m.

j. 20-cv-60885 – Thompson v. Fort Lauderdale Law Group, 

i. Call-in time: 3:30 p.m.

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2020 Page 2 of 3
k. 20-cv-61772 – Lucoff v. American Express Centurion Bank, 

i. Call-in time: 3:40 p.m.

 DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 21st day of September 2020. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 ROY K. ALTMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

cc: counsel of record 

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2020 Page 3 of 3
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 1 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 2 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 3 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 4 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 5 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 6 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 7 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 8 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 9 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 10 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 11 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 12 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 13 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 14 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 15 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 16 of 16
øß ‹Æ a ° ­2±Ã ÎÚ Ó ”–a ·o ©a ̈ ø ̈ Õ