alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Standard Review Plans for Environmental Reviews for Nuclear Power Plants: Environmental Standard Review Plan (NUREG-1555)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, August 01, 2024
No: III-23-012 May 25, 2023 

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662 

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663 

NRC Schedules Public Meeting to Discuss 2022

Performance of Byron and Braidwood Stations

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a virtual public meeting June 1 to discuss the 

2022 safety performance of the Byron and Braidwood nuclear power plants. Both two-unit plants are based 

in Illinois and are operated by Constellation Energy Generation. 

The online meeting will be held from 5-6 p.m. Central time and can be accessed via Microsoft 

Teams or by phone. The telephone conference number is 301-576-2978, passcode 924411735#. The NRC 

staff responsible for plant inspection and oversight, including the resident inspectors based full-time at the 

sites, will make a presentation and answer questions from the public at the meeting. 

The NRC determined that Byron and Braidwood plants operated safely during 2022. All inspection 

findings and performance indicators for both plants were green, or of very low safety significance. As a 

result, Byron and Braidwood remain under NRC’s normal level of oversight, which entails thousands of 

hours of inspection each year.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to assess 

plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, commensurate with the 

safety significance of the issues involved. If an inspection finding or performance indicator has more than 

very low safety significance, the NRC increases its oversight.

Inspections are performed by two NRC resident inspectors assigned to each plant and specialist 

inspectors from the Region III Office in Lisle, Illinois.

The annual assessment letters for Byron and Braidwood are available on the NRC website. Current 

performance information for the plants is also available and updated on a quarterly basis.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                    This  schedule   contains  summary   financial   information
                    extracted from the Balance  Sheet,  Statements of Operations
                    and  Statements  of  Cash  Flows,  and is  qualified  in its
                    entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000895464
<NAME>                        Magna-Lab Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                       1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.000
<CASH>                                         1,566,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,696,000
<PP&E>                                             8,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   401,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,704,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,023,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          36,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       901,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,704,000
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    354,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (334,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (334,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (334,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.01)



</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.1723 Pool Loan receivables received by Seller.

Any Pool Loan Receivables received by Seller in connection with obligations under Seller's Pool Loan must be forwarded by Seller to CSA within two business days of receipt of collected funds.
#### § 19.120 Transfers of property.

If a recipient sells or otherwise transfers property financed in whole or in part with Federal financial assistance to a transferee that operates any education program or activity, and the Federal share of the fair market value of the property is not upon such sale or transfer properly accounted for to the Federal Government, both the transferor and the transferee shall be deemed to be recipients, subject to the provisions of §§ 19.205 through 19.235(a).
(No. 1083

Claimant awarded $2,150.00.)

#### Jesse E. Bartley, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 12, 1927.*

*Services*— when *State liable for legal service rendered.*Where legal services have been rendered for the State which is beneficial to it, the State . is liable to pay a fair and reasonable attorney fee for such services.

Jesse E. Bartley, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Prank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an action brought by claimant for services rendered in prosecuting a certain suit against E. E. Mitchell in his official capacity of State Treasurer on an alleged breach of his official bond.

It appears that claimant was employed in a legal manner by the Attorney General of the State, and it does appear that he performed valuable services for the State, as shown by the evidence; in fact, the court has been informed and so believes that he recovered for the State of Illinois, through his efforts in the prosecution of the case against said Mitchell, the sum of $20,000.00. As a matter of fact, the- State of Illinois -has been benefited through the efforts of this claimant in that amount, and it is disclosed by the records that substantially all of the legal services performed in connection with this case were performed by claimant.

It appears to this court that efficient services were performed by claimant; that the defendant, the State of Illinois, was benefited in actual dollars and cents by the efforts of the claimant, and it further appears to the court that as a matter *366of equity and good conscience, if not as a matter of law, and we believe there has been a legal contract between the State of Illinois and claimant for the performance of these services, and that therefore the claimant should be paid a fair and reasonable amount for the services actually rendered the people of the State of Illinois.

This court, after viewing all of the facts in the case and after diligently investigating the value of the work performed by the claimant, is of the opinion that the fair and reasonable •compensation to be paid to the claimant for the services performed would be, and the court hereby recommends, that the claimant be allowed the sum of $2,150.00.
No: II-23-012 May 3, 2023 

Contact: Dave Gasperson, 404-997-4417 

NRC Schedules Virtual Meeting to Discuss

North Anna and Surry Nuclear Power Plant Performance

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss the 2022 safety performance of the North 

Anna and Surry nuclear power plants during a virtual public meeting to be held May 9. The twounit North Anna plant is located in central Virginia, and the two-unit Surry plant is in southeastern 

Virginia. Dominion Energy operates both sites. 

The event will begin at 6 p.m. Eastern time led by the NRC staff responsible for conducting 

plant inspections. The public and the media can access the meeting via Microsoft Teams. The 

telephone conference number for those without access to Teams is 301-576-2978, passcode 

712530420#. 

NRC resident inspectors and other specialist inspectors from the NRC Region II office in 

Atlanta perform inspections at the North Anna and Surry plants. They concluded that the North 

Anna and Surry plants operated safely in 2022, and all inspection findings and performance 

indicators were green or of very low safety significance. As a result, the plant remains under the 

NRC’s normal level of oversight, which entails thousands of hours of inspection each year. 

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or 

performance indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC 

oversight. 

The annual assessment letters for both plants, including upcoming inspection plans, is 

available on the NRC website. Current performance information for both sites is available and 

updated quarterly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-1-1994
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1994
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        1000
<OTHER-SE>                      (1000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0
                                

</TABLE>
```

[109th Congress Public Law 24]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ024.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 367]]

Public Law 109-24
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   321 Montgomery Road in Altamonte Springs, Florida, as the ``Arthur 
 Stacey Mastrapa Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 12, 2005 -  [H.R. 
                                 324]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 321 
Montgomery Road in Altamonte Springs, Florida, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Arthur Stacey Mastrapa Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Arthur Stacey Mastrapa Post 
Office Building''.

    Approved July 12, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 324:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Feb. 15, considered and passed House.
            June 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 Date: August 7, 2007
    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR
WILLIAMS COAL SEAM GAS ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
    /s/ RON E. HOOPERRon E. HooperSenior Vice President and Administrator
Bank of America, N.A.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-26 April 10, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NOTE TO EDITORS:

NRC CHAIRMAN TO HOLD NEWS CONFERENCE ON THURSDAY, APRIL 13

Reporters Invited To View Via Videoconference At Regional Office

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Richard A. Meserve will hold a news conference at

11:00 a.m. (Edt) on Thursday, April 13, to discuss current NRC initiatives. The news conference will

be held at NRC headquarters in Rockville, Maryland, but will be available to interested observers in

other parts of the United States via videoconference to the agency’s regional offices.

Interested reporters are invited to view the news conference while it is in progress via special

videoconference arrangements in the Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa.

Reporters who plan to attend are asked to the Region I public affairs officers, either by

telephone or email. Reporters should report to the Public Meeting Room of the NRC Region I Office,

475 Allendale Road, in King of Prussia, Pa.

##
§ 46.110 Incorporating consensus-based management. ( a ) Consensus-based management incorporates direct community involvement in consideration of bureau activities subject to NEPA analyses, from initial scoping to implementation of the bureau decision. It seeks to achieve agreement from diverse interests on the goals of, purposes of, and needs for bureau plans and activities, as well as the methods anticipated to carry out those plans and activities. For the purposes of this Part, consensus-based management involves outreach to persons, organizations or communities who may be interested in or affected by a proposed action with an assurance that their input will be given consideration by the Responsible Official in selecting a course of action.
( b ) In incorporating consensus-based management in the NEPA process, bureaus should consider any consensus-based alternative(s) put forth by those participating persons, organizations or communities who may be interested in or affected by the proposed action. While there is no guarantee that any particular consensus-based alternative will be considered to be a reasonable alternative or be identified as the bureau's preferred alternative, bureaus must be able to show that the reasonable consensus-based alternative, if any, is reflected in the evaluation of the proposed action and discussed in the final decision. To be selected for implementation, a consensus-based alternative must be fully consistent with NEPA, the CEQ regulations, and all applicable statutory and regulatory provisions, as well as Departmental and bureau written policies and guidance.
( c ) The Responsible Official must, whenever practicable, use a consensus-based management approach to the NEPA process.
( d ) If the Responsible Official determines that the consensus-based alternative, if any, is not the preferred alternative, he or she must state the reasons for this determination in the environmental document.
( e ) When practicing consensus-based management in the NEPA process, bureaus must comply with all applicable laws, including any applicable provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA).
§ 125.10 Mentor-Protégé programs of other agencies. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, a Federal department or agency may not carry out a mentor-protégé program for small business unless the head of the department or agency submits a plan to the SBA Administrator for the program and the SBA Administrator approves the plan. Before starting a new mentor protégé program, the head of a department or agency must submit a plan to the SBA Administrator. Within one year of the effective date of this section, the head of a department or agency must submit a plan to the SBA for any previously existing mentor-protégé program that the department or agency seeks to continue.
( b ) The SBA Administrator will approve or disapprove a plan submitted under paragraph (a) of this section based on whether the proposed program: ( 1 ) Will assist protégés to compete for Federal prime contracts and subcontracts; and
( 2 ) Complies with the provisions set forth in §§ 125.9 and 124.520 of this chapter, as applicable.
( c ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to: ( 1 ) Any mentor-protégé program of the Department of Defense;
( 2 ) Any mentoring assistance provided under a Small Business Innovation Research Program or a Small Business Technology Transfer Program; and
( 3 ) A mentor-protégé program operated by a Department or agency on January 2, 2013, for a period of one year after the effective date of this section.
( d ) The head of each Federal department or agency carrying out an agency-specific mentor-protégé program must report annually to SBA: ( 1 ) The participants (both protégé firms and their approved mentors) in its mentor-protégé program. This includes identifying the number of participants that are: ( i ) Small business concerns;
( ii ) Small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans;
( iii ) Small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals;
( iv ) Small business concerns owned and controlled by Indian tribes, Alaska Native Corporations, Native Hawaiian Organizations, and Community Development Corporations; and
( v ) Small business concerns owned and controlled by women;
( 2 ) The assistance provided to small businesses through the program; and
( 3 ) The progress of protégé firms under the program to compete for Federal prime contracts and subcontracts.
[81 FR 48585, July 25, 2016]
### §9823. Air ambulance report requirements

#### (a) In general

Each group health plan shall submit to the Secretary, jointly with the Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of Health and Human Services—

(1) not later than the date that is 90 days after the last day of the first calendar year beginning on or after the date on which a final rule is promulgated pursuant to the rulemaking described in section 106(d) of the No Surprises Act, the information described in subsection (b) with respect to such plan year; and

(2) not later than the date that is 90 days after the last day of the calendar year immediately succeeding the plan year described in paragraph (1), such information with respect to such immediately succeeding plan year.

#### (b) Information described

For purposes of subsection (a), information described in this subsection, with respect to a group health plan is each of the following:

(1) Claims data for air ambulance services furnished by providers of such services, disaggregated by each of the following factors:

(A) Whether such services were furnished on an emergent or nonemergent basis.

(B) Whether the provider of such services is part of a hospital-owned or sponsored program, municipality-sponsored program, hospital independent partnership (hybrid) program, independent program, or tribally operated program in Alaska.

(C) Whether the transport in which the services were furnished originated in a rural or urban area.

(D) The type of aircraft (such as rotor transport or fixed wing transport) used to furnish such services.

(E) Whether the provider of such services has a contract with the plan or issuer, as applicable, to furnish such services under the plan or coverage, respectively.

(2) Such other information regarding providers of air ambulance services as the Secretary may specify.

(Added Pub. L. 116–260, div. BB, title I, §106(b)(3)(A), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2854.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 106(d) of the No Surprises Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is section 106(d) of div. BB of Pub. L. 116–260, which is set out as a note under section 300gg–118 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,565,159
<SECURITIES>                                10,641,156
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,501,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                   192,020
<INVENTORY>                                  3,742,039
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,637,251
<PP&E>                                      20,049,857
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,965,883
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,482,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,265,515
<BONDS>                                      7,796,498
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       263,725
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,146,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,482,105
<SALES>                                      5,670,894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,670,894
<CGS>                                        4,269,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,580,867
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (186,595)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             150,074
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,143,409)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,143,409)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,143,409)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>