alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23102]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that on September 20, 2004, a proposed consent decree in 
United States v. Mississippi Bakery, a division of Aldi, Inc., Civil 
Action No. 304CV80102 was lodged with the United States District Court 
for the Southern District of Iowa.
    In this action the United States sought civil penalties and 
injunctive relief with respect to violations of the Clean Air Act, 42 
U.S.C. 7401, et. seq. (``CAA'') at defendant's Mississippi Bakery 
facility located in Burlington, Iowa. This consent decree requires the 
defendant to pay a civil penalty of $60,000 and to perform injunctive 
relief to address violations of the industrial refrigerant repair, 
testing, recordkeeping and reporting regulations at 40 CFR Part 82, 
Subpart F, Sec. Sec.  82.152--82.166, promulgated pursuant to 
Subchapter VI of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7671-7671q.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the consent 
decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to 
United States v. Mississippi Bakery, a division of Aldi, Inc., D.J. 
Ref. 90-5-2-08100.
    The consent decree may be examined at the Office of the United 
States Attorney, Southern District of Iowa, U.S. Courthouse Annex, 
Southern District of Iowa, U.S. Courthouse Annex, Suite 286, 110 E. 
Court Avenue, Des Moines, Iowa 50309, and at U.S. EPA Region 7, 901 No. 
5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. During the public comment 
period, the consent decree, may also be examined on the following 
Department of Justice Web site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html. A 
copy of the consent decree may also be obtained by mail from the 
Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20044-7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 
Fleetwood (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcc8d3d2d5dd92dad0d9d9c8cbd3d3d8fcc9cfd8d3d692dbd3ca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d8acb7b6b1b9f6beb4bdbdacafb7b7bc98adabbcb7b2f6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>), fax No. (202) 514-0097, phone 
confirmation number (202) 514-1547. In requesting a copy from the 
Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $3.75 
(25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury.

Catherine R. McCabe,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23102 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Richard E. Stoddard, Chief Executive Officer of Kaiser Ventures LLC (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1. The amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2001 (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                       
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: December 2, 2004 |  | /s/ Richard E. Stoddard               
|                       |  | Richard E. Stoddard                   
|                       |  | Chairman of the Board, President & CEO



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Louis LeCalsey, III, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December31, 2005 of Tufco Technologies, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 14, 2006   /s/ Louis LeCalsey, III Louis LeCalsey, III  President and Chief Executive Officer  
18
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

          - [STB Finance Docket No. 34553] 

Idaho & Sedalia Transportation Company, LLC (I&S), a noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to lease from Idaho Northern & Pacific Railroad Company (INPR) and operate 5 miles of rail line between milepost 94.68, near Cascade, and milepost 99.68, at Cascade, ID. 

I&S certifies that its projected revenues as a result of this transaction will not result in I&S becoming a Class II or Class I rail carrier, and further certifies that its projected revenues will not exceed $5 million. The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on or shortly after September 22, 2004. 

                    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void                     *ab initio.*                     Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke does not automatically stay the transaction.                 

An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB Finance Docket No. 34553, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be served on Karl Morell, Ball Janik LLP, Suite 225, 1455 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. 

                    Board decisions and notices are available on its Web site at                     *http://www.stb.dot.gov.*

Decided: October 7, 2004. 

By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of Proceedings. 

Vernon A. Williams, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-23050 Filed 10-14-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
#### The Ansonia v. Edna V. Hein.

Motion granted unless appellant complies with terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
122 STAT. 724 PUBLIC LAW 110–211—MAY 7, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3468: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Feb. 12, considered and passed House. 

Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–211 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1704 

Weeksville Road in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Dr. Clifford Bell 

Jones, Sr. Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DR. CLIFFORD BELL JONES, SR. POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1704 Weeksville Road in Elizabeth City, North 

Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Dr. Clifford Bell 

Jones, Sr. Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Dr. Clifford Bell Jones, Sr. Post Office’’. 

Approved May 7, 2008. 

May 7, 2008 

[H.R. 3468] 


jbridges on POFP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 159 (Friday, October 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22692]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee; Notice 
of Partially Closed Meeting

    The Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee 
(SITAC) will meet on October 26, 2004, 9:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. 
Hoover Building, Room 3884, 14th Street between Constitution and 
Pennsylvania Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the 
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on 
technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable 
to sensors and instrumentation equipment and technology.

Agenda

Public Session

    1. Opening remarks and introductions.
    2. Review of SITAC Annual Report.
    3. Update on Bureau of Industry and Security initiatives.
    4. Discussion on potential Wassenaar Export Group proposals on 
semiconductor lasers (6A005) and cameras (6A003).
    5. Election of SITAC chairman.
    6. Discussion of goals for Fiscal Year 2005.
    7. Presentation of papers and comments by the public.

Closed Session

    8. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 
sections 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
    A limited number of seats will be available during the public 
session of the meeting. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent 
that time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to 
the Committee. The public may submit written statements at any time 
before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of 
public presentation materials to the Committee members, the Committee 
suggests that the materials be forwarded before the meeting to Ms. Lee 
Ann Carpenter at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b57787a696b7e756f5b797268357f7478357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="efa38c8e9d9f8a819baf8d869cc18b808cc1888099">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the General Counsel, formally determined on September 13, 2004, 
pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee ACt, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 section 10(d)), that the portion of this 
meeting dealing with pre-decisional changes to the Commerce Control 
List and U.S. export control policies shall be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 
sections 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the meeting 
will be open to the public.
    For more information contact Lee Ann Carpenter on (202) 482-2583.

    Dated: October 5, 2004.
Lee Ann Carpenter,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-22692 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Falao TOALEPAI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. George GALAZA, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-55856.

D.C. No. CV-99-03036-SVW-SH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*630Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 24, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Falao Toalepai appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 motion as untimely. Toalepai seeks to challenge his jury trial conviction for one count of first degree murder with a deadly weapon in violation of Cal. Pen.Code §§ 187 and 12022(b). We do not reach the merits of Toalepai’s appeal because we hold that we lack appellate jurisdiction.

A timely filed notice of appeal is both mandatory and jurisdictional. *Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978). Although ignored by the parties, we are “required to consider the timeliness of the appeal.” *Rodgers v. Watt,*722 F.2d 456, 457 (9th Cir.1983); *see also Pettibone v. Cupp,*666 F.2d 333, 335 (9th Cir.1981) (holding that a district court may not construe an untimely notice of appeal as a motion for extension of time).

On February 16, 2000, the district court entered judgment dismissing Toalepai’s habeas petition. Applying the prison mailbox rule articulated in *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 275-76, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988), we determine that Toalepai filed his notice of appeal on April 15, 2000. Accordingly, Toalepai’s petition filed more than 30 days from the entry of judgment fails to confer appellate jurisdiction upon this Court. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1) (notice of appeal from a district court’s judgment in a civil case must be filed within thirty days of the date of judgment); *see also Malone v. Avenenti,*850 F.2d 569, 571 (9th Cir.1988) (holding that an appeal from a denial of a habeas petition is considered a “civil” matter and is therefore subject to the time limitations in Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of

The State of Connecticut and

PSEG Power Connecticut LLC

)

)

)

)

)

Trading Agreement and Order 8244

Modification No.3

Whereas, the Commissioner of Environmental Protection ("Commissioner") and PSEG Power

Connecticut LLC ('Respondent) having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading

Agreement and Order 8244 and all previous modification thereto, do now, by mutual agreement,

further modify said modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows:

1. All references to May 1, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions

reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to

comply with the emissions limits of Subsections 22a-I74-22(d)(1) through 22a-I74-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations ofConnecticut State Agencies ('Regulations) are hereby

replaced with May 1,2010.

2. Any references to October 1st with respect to the date by which the Respondents shall

estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits (DERCS) and/or allowances

for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009.

3. Any references to May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 with respect to calculation and

retirement of non-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 31, 2009 and May 31,

2010.

4. All references to September 1,2008 with respect to the submission of Future

Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September 1,2009.

5. No later than May 1, 2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading

Agreement and Order 8244 and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent shall

comply with the requirements of Sections 22a-I74-22(d)(1) and 22a-I74-22(d)(2)(A) of

the Regulations.

6. All other terms and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order 8244, as modified, shall

remain in effect.

(Printed on Recycled Paper)

79 Elm Street· Hartford, CT 06106-5127

http://www,ct.gov/dep

All Equal Opportullity Employer
PSEG Power Connecticut LLC 2 Trading Agreement and Order 8244

Modification No.3

The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement

and Order without further notice.

PSEG Power Connecticut LLC

Signature: _~~~""'-"-J _ Name: )Ulf-I A. ~t&.~

Title: ~!AN-I- /1"w~e.'"

Date: A.l'",.j Ciloo9

Issued as a modification of a Trading Agreement and Order.

~c:::o d. k Date 04 -.:J.? - .;L='t

Director

Engineering and Enforcement Division

Bureau ofAir Management
EXHIBIT 23


                      [LETTERHEAD OF PUGH & COMPANY, P.C.]





                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
United Tennessee Bankshares, Inc.
Newport, Tennessee


We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statement  (No.
333-41571 and 333-82803) on Form S-8 of United Tennessee Bankshares, Inc. of our
report  dated  March  16,  2001,  relating  to the  consolidated  statements  of
financial  condition of United Tennessee  Bankshares,  Inc. and subsidiary as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related  consolidated  statements of income,
comprehensive  income,  changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the  three-year  period ended  December  31, 2000,  which report
appears  in the  December  31,  2000  annual  report  on Form  10-KSB  of United
Tennessee Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiary.


                                                   /s/ Pugh & Company, P.C.

                                                   Certified Public Accountants
                                                   Knoxville, Tennessee
                                                   March 27, 2001
### SNAP application - Unilever/Ben&Jerry's Monica Shimamura to: Gosselin, Pete 02/20/2009 05:15 PM

Cc: "Gerrard, Alan", "Shakalis, Andrew" <Andrew.Shakalis@unilever.com>, Margaret Sheppard, Julius Banks, Karen Thundiyil
Follow Up: Normal Priority.

Hi Pete, Alan, and Andrew, Its been awhile since we last spoke and I was hoping that we could arrange a conference call sometime next week (or the week after) to provide an update on where we are with your application. What day would work for Unilever/Ben and Jerry's? How does next Tuesday (2/24) or Thursday (2/26) look for you guys? On another note, I was wondering if you were able to get a shipment of R290? We had postponed our ice cream cabinet outing since at the time Unilever/ Ben and Jerry's didn't have R290 to show us how a recovery and recharge of the cabinets would be conducted. If you do have the shipment we would be interested in trying to set up a field trip again.

Cheers, Monica

Monica Shimamura U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Stratospheric Protection Division 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW (6205J) Washington DC 20460 (tel) 202.343.9337 (fax) 202.343.2362

Address for hand delivery (UPS/Fed Ex/etc): 1310 L St. NW, 10th Floor (1027N) Washington DC 20005

.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o> .· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o> ,.· ́ ̄`·. ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o>  ̧.· ́ ̄`·..· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o> .· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o>.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o> .· ́ ̄`·.><((((o> ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o>.· ́ ̄`·.><((((o> ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧><((((o>
#### William A. Beaudry v. John N. McKinnon and Others.

Motion granted and injunction continued on plaintiff giving an undertaking of $1,000 within five days after decision of this motion. Defendants to have leave to move to vacate stay if appeal is not argued on June twelfth. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### §1395. Plan notification to corporation of potentially significant withdrawals

The corporation may, by regulation, require the plan sponsor of a multiemployer plan to provide notice to the corporation when the withdrawal from the plan by any employer has resulted, or will result, in a significant reduction in the amount of aggregate contributions under the plan made by employers.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title IV, §4215, as added Pub. L. 96–364, title I, §104(2), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1234.)