alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MAXXIS GROUP, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,867,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,081,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   931,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,093,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,278,000
<PP&E>                                       6,684,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,684,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,667,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,744,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,141,000
<COMMON>                                       575,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,923,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,667,000
<SALES>                                     29,133,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,133,000
<CGS>                                        9,214,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,214,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,238,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                32,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             616,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,033,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,033,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,033,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56


</TABLE>
OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

p.1 

^Documept Number: 

!6)II-E-196 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:11 AM Sheet 236 of 264 
P.2 

Sent by:PJ MCDONAL D RCI Oct-25-9 7 01:58PI>I fron 9 193191547*1919941023 4 

Received Oct-12-97 02:48pm from 19199410234 •* PJ MCDONALO RCI 

10/30/98 14:12 ©1818*410234 PES RTP NG 

pag e 1 / 2 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Company: 

Contact Report 

Shawn McK«e, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

October 30.1998 

Mr. Put McDonald 

Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. 

Telephone Number: (919)990-7500 

Pa* Number; (919)319-1547 

page 2 

(2)002 

PA^»OCKET'~ 

.J 

Contact Summary: 

Mr. Pat McDonald was contacted to give infonnation about the cost differential between nonvapor suppressed resins and vapor suppressed resins. Mr. McDonald stated that vapor suppressants 

typically add $0.01 to S0.04 per pound to the price of resins. He stated that the variation in the 

added price occurs because of the Increased difficulty of adding vapor suppressants to certain resins, 

as well as an increase in the cost of the suppressant Itself. 

Mr. McDonald also stated that sMPtf the increase in cost that the resin users face Is due 

to the burden of isolating the vapor suppressed resin)y3a_m&_M_OM_y urease in the cost of ihe 

win* (7 

OK 

£-n fOsf "f/Kg frfff^'^ 

re- WM ')/t'AtJtfHrv 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE / 
P.3 

Sent by:P J P1CD0NRLD RCI Oct-25-9 7 01:58PP I fro n 9193191547*1919941023 4 page 2 / 2 

*> FN • ll/M\riKIAI n O f I |/os c > *m« lQiq<M10?34 -» PJ MCDONALD RCI ®001 

«gfsi/(i&»__' 

§ W « ww*-***TM. SUW1CB6, «*• 

CannatParKM5001 South Miami WUKW*. Suitsi SQO 

RO. Bcw 12077 

R «. S rcn TW-ogte P»*, NO OTOMB" 

n

 (91ft) 941-0333 

FAX COMMUNICATION 

Date: 

77? i^-fe^^— 

Name: 

Address: 

£i2Li__W--

Phone Number: _. 

REFERENCE CODE: MJ?^ •£>sD 

m% tmuncATta. CBWISES __ _ was wcuioi* TM« mi. 

Attached ie a summary of our phone conversation concerning 

your company', operations. Sine*, this information may beplaced 

Tn the public document for the U.S. EPA'3 rulemaking for plastic 

composites production, we wish to ensure chat it is accuraca. 

plaase review ch* acraehad report and mark any specific 

changes you believe are necessary or sign the report if it is 

okay- and ***

 i c bac k c o m * a c [91S ) 941 "0234 -

Thank you for you cooperation. 

• SXIX0T9N. P.O. • M0_ W -.-«_ « «A«. »° • W» ANOM.«. CA • C.KOW-T,. OH 

' Z -
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

101 Marietta St., Suite 2900, Atlanta, GA 30323

Tel. 404-331-5503 or 7878

No.: II-97-17 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Friday, February 7, 1997)

Roger Hannah 404-331-7878

NRC SCHEDULES MEETING WITH FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TO DISCUSS RECENT

ST. LUCIE PLANT PERFORMANCE AND EMPLOYEE CONCERNS PROGRAM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting

for Thursday, February 13 at 1:00 p.m. with Florida Power & Light

Company at the St. Lucie nuclear plant to discuss the status of

recent plant performance.

In addition, the NRC staff has asked FPL to address the status

of the “Speak Out” employee concerns program, the company’s views

regarding the increase in the number of allegations at St. Lucie in

the last several years, and any planned actions the company intends

to take to ensure employees feel free to raise safety concerns to

their management.

The meeting will be held at the plant in the Nuclear Training

Center Building and is open to members of the public for

observation.

#
FIGURE 1VESSEL CLEANING RESIDUE DISPOSAL PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAMNOT UNDER SUBMITTER’S CONTROLDATE4/1/2013SCALENTSCONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATIONFIGURE 2FIELD INJECTION SYSTEM PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAMNOT UNDER SUBMITTER’S CONTROLDATE4/1/2013SCALENTSCONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATIONFIGURE 3SHIPPING CONTAINER RESIDUAL MANAGEMENT PROCESS FLOWDIAGRAMNOT UNDER SUBMITTER’S CONTROLDATE4/1/2013SCALENTSCONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION
NO. 12-09-00176-CR

NO. 12-09-00177-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TONY FITZGERALD PRICE,

APPELLANT ' APPEALS FROM THE 217TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss these appeals. The motion is signed by 

Appellant and his counsel. No opinion has been delivered in these appeals. Accordingly, 

Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and these appeals are dismissed. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.2(a).

Opinion delivered August 25, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
### §§1791i, 1791j. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 1791i and 1791j of this title were omitted in the general revision of this subchapter by Pub. L. 102–367, title V, §501, title VII, §701(a), Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1099, 1103, effective July 1, 1993.

Section 1791i, Pub. L. 97–300, title V, §510, as added Pub. L. 100–628, title VII, §712(a)(3), Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3253, related to awards to States for start-up costs for participation in the incentive bonus program.

Section 1791j, Pub. L. 97–300, title V, §511, as added Pub. L. 100–628, title VII, §712(a)(3), Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3254, related to evaluation and performance standards for the incentive bonus program.
### §2265. Certification and judicial review

(a) Certification.—

(1) In general.—If requested by an appropriate State official, the Attorney General of the United States shall determine—

(A) whether the State has established a mechanism for the appointment, compensation, and payment of reasonable litigation expenses of competent counsel in State postconviction proceedings brought by indigent prisoners who have been sentenced to death;

(B) the date on which the mechanism described in subparagraph (A) was established; and

(C) whether the State provides standards of competency for the appointment of counsel in proceedings described in subparagraph (A).

(2) Effective date.—The date the mechanism described in paragraph (1)(A) was established shall be the effective date of the certification under this subsection.

(3) Only express requirements.—There are no requirements for certification or for application of this chapter other than those expressly stated in this chapter.

(b) Regulations.—The Attorney General shall promulgate regulations to implement the certification procedure under subsection (a).

(c) Review of Certification.—

(1) In general.—The determination by the Attorney General regarding whether to certify a State under this section is subject to review exclusively as provided under chapter 158 of this title.

(2) Venue.—The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit shall have exclusive jurisdiction over matters under paragraph (1), subject to review by the Supreme Court under section 2350 of this title.

(3) Standard of review.—The determination by the Attorney General regarding whether to certify a State under this section shall be subject to de novo review.

(Added Pub. L. 109–177, title V, §507(c)(1), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 250.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2265, added Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §107(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1223, related to the application of sections 2262, 2263, 2264, and 2266 of this title to State unitary review procedures, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–177, title V, §507(c)(1), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 250.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to cases pending on or after Mar. 9, 2006, with special rule for certain cases pending on that date, see section 507(d) of Pub. L. 109–177, set out as an Effective Date of 2006 Amendment note under section 2251 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.541 Time for approval by SBA. ( a ) Except as set forth in paragraph (c) of this section, in responding to a request for approval under §§ 120.540(b), 120.540(c), 120.536(b)(5) or 120.536(b)(6), SBA will approve or deny the request within 15 business days of the date when SBA receives the request. If SBA is unable to approve or deny the request within this 15-day period, SBA will provide a written notice of no decision to the Lender or Authorized CDC Liquidator, stating the reason for SBA's inability to act; an estimate of the additional time required to act on the plan or request; and, if SBA deems appropriate, requesting additional information.
( b ) Except as set forth in paragraph (c) of this section, unless SBA gives its written consent to a proposed liquidation or litigation plan, or a proposed amendment of a plan, or any of the actions set forth in § 120.536(b)(5) or § 120.536(b)(6), SBA will not be deemed to have approved the proposed action.
( c ) If a Lender seeks to perform liquidation on a loan made under its authority as a CLP Lender by submitting a liquidation plan to SBA for approval, SBA will approve or deny such plan within ten business days. If SBA fails to approve or deny the plan within ten business days, SBA will be deemed to have approved such plan.
[72 FR 18362, Apr. 12, 2007]
### §1868. Maintenance and inspection of records

After the master jury wheel is emptied and refilled pursuant to section 1863(b)(4) of this title, and after all persons selected to serve as jurors before the master wheel was emptied have completed such service, all records and papers compiled and maintained by the jury commission or clerk before the master wheel was emptied shall be preserved in the custody of the clerk for four years or for such longer period as may be ordered by a court, and shall be available for public inspection for the purpose of determining the validity of the selection of any jury.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 953; Pub. L. 90–274, §101, Mar. 27, 1968, 82 Stat. 60.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§416, 417 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§279, 280, 36 Stat. 1165, Jan. 31, 1929, ch. 126, 45 Stat. 1145).

Section consolidates parts of sections 416, 417 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with necessary changes in phraseology.

The remaining portion of section 416 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., constitutes section 1867 of this title.

The remainder of section 417 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., is incorporated in section 1866 of this title.

Words, "in the opinion of the court, disqualified" were substituted for "not an indifferent person, or is interested in the event of the cause".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1968—Pub. L. 90–274 substituted provisions for the maintenance and inspection of records in the hands of the commission or clerk before the master wheel was emptied for provisions covering the disqualification of the United States marshal or his deputy and the appointment of a disinterested person by the court.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–274 effective 270 days after Mar. 27, 1968, except as to cases in which an indictment has been returned or a petit jury empaneled prior to such effective date, see section 104 of Pub. L. 90–274, set out as a note under section 1861 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6579

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner - Appellee, versus KEITH DARNELL BILLINGS, Respondent - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (CR-99-249-4-2; CA-01-2315-4-12) Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 22, 2004 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Darnell Billings, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Keith Darnell Billings, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Billings has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Adolph C. Kiendl, as Trustee under Indenture dated April 1, 1939, Respondent, v. Prudence Realization Corporation, Appellant-Respondent, Realty Associates Securities Corporation et al., Defendants, and City Bank Farmers Trust Company et al., as Trustees under the Will of Blanche P. Taylor, Respondents-Appellants.

Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In  connection  with the  annual  report  of  MedSolutions,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2002,  as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),
Matthew  H.  Fleeger,  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,  hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



                                                     /s/  MATTHEW H. FLEEGER
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Matthew H. Fleeger
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     Date:  April 15, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23404]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4901-N-43]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 22, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Burruss, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988, 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: October 14, 2004.
Mark R. Johnston,
Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.
[FR Doc. 04-23404 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
Docket No: FAA-2015-6541 Dir ID: 2015-NM-135
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 95-4253

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Water-table configuration-PLATE |

Kay, R.T., Duwelius, R.F., Brown, T.A., Micke, F.A., Witt-Smith, C.A., 1996, Geohydrology, water levels and directions of flow, and occurrence
of light-nonaqueous-phase liquids on ground water in northwestern Indiana and the Lake Calumet area of northeastern Illinois,

89° 10'

|

av 7|

Area of
Enlargement

/

’

EXPLANATION

WATER-TABLE CONTOUR--Shows altitude of water
table. Dashed where approximate. Contour interval
variable. Datum is sea level

WELL

582—--~_________------«

41° 40"

41° 35'

Base from U.S. Geological Survey 0 1 2 3 4 SMILES

Aigd.000 Digital Line Graphs f T T T T T
ers Equal-Area Conic Projection

Standard parallels 41° 30’ and 41° 50’, central meridian -87° 22° 30" 0 1 2 3 4 5 KILOMETERS

WATER-TABLE CONFIGURATION, NORTHWESTERN INDIANA AND THE LAKE CALUMET
AREA OF NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS, JUNE 23-25, 1992
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—SPECIAL DEMONSTRATIONS AND TRAINING PROJECTS
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-74 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.1312 What are the limitations on the introduction of new evidence?

The Judge may not admit evidence beyond the written protest file nor permit any form of discovery. All appeals under this subpart will be decided solely on a review of the evidence in the written protest file, arguments made in the appeal petition, and response(s) filed thereto.
§ 108.760 How a change in size or activity of a Portfolio Concern affects the NMVC Company and the Portfolio Concern. ( a ) *Effect on NMVC Company of a change in size of a Portfolio Concern.* If a Portfolio Concern no longer qualifies as a Small Business you may keep your investment in the concern and: ( 1 ) Subject to the overline limitations of § 108.740, you may provide additional Financing to the concern up to the time it makes a public offering of its securities.
( 2 ) Even after the concern makes a public offering, you may exercise any stock options, warrants, or other rights to purchase Equity Securities which you acquired before the public offering, or fund Commitments you made before the public offering.
( b ) *Effect of a change in business activity occurring within one year of NMVC Company's initial Financing* — ( 1 ) *Retention of Investment.* Unless you receive SBA's written approval, you may not keep your investment in a Portfolio Concern, small or otherwise, which becomes ineligible by reason of a change in its business activity within one year of your initial investment.
( 2 ) *Request for SBA 's approval to retain investment.* If you request that SBA approve the retention of your investment, your request must include sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the change in business activity was caused by an unforeseen change in circumstances and was not contemplated at the time the Financing was made.
( 3 ) *Additional Financing.* If SBA approves your request to retain an investment under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, you may provide additional Financing to the Portfolio Concern to the extent necessary to protect against the loss of the amount of your original investment, subject to the overline limitations of § 108.740.
( c ) *Effect of a change in business activity occurring more than one year after the initial Financing.* If a Portfolio Concern becomes ineligible because of a change in business activity more than one year after your initial Financing you may: ( 1 ) Retain your investment; and
( 2 ) Provide additional Financing to the Portfolio Concern to the extent necessary to protect against the loss of the amount of your original investment, subject to the overline limitations of § 108.740.
#### Mabel Schoengold, Respondent, v. Mac Bier, Individually and as Trustee under an Agreement Dated June 26, 1942, Appellant.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.