alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 533 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 533

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To require a guidance clarity statement on certain agency guidance, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guidance Clarity Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. GUIDANCE CLARITY STATEMENT REQUIRED.

    (a) Requirement.--Each agency, as defined in section 551 of title 
5, United States Code, shall include a guidance clarity statement as 
described in subsection (b) on any guidance issued by that agency under 
section 553(b)(3)(A) of title 5, United States Code, on and after the 
date that is 30 days after the date on which the Director of the Office 
of Management and Budget issues the guidance required under subsection 
(c).
    (b) Guidance Clarity Statement.--A guidance clarity statement 
required under subsection (a) shall--
            (1) be displayed prominently on the first page of the 
        document; and
            (2) include the following: ``The contents of this document 
        do not have the force and effect of law and do not, of 
        themselves, bind the public or the agency. This document is 
        intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding 
        existing requirements under the law or agency policies.''.
    (c) OMB Guidance.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and 
Budget shall issue guidance to implement this Act.

            Passed the Senate September 14, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 533

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To require a guidance clarity statement on certain agency guidance, and 
                          for other purposes.
```
| Initiative for Increasing Seat Belt Use Nationwide |
|----------------------------------------------------|

| **National**

**Background**

**Taking         Responsibility**

**The         National Goals****The National Strategy****The Four Point Plan****Specific Activities to Implement the National Strategy**

**Reporting         and Recognition**

**Funding**

**Executive         Order**

Full         Report |  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7298

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TERRY D. JONES, a/k/a Rick, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-37) Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 20, 1999 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry D. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order denying Jones’s Rule 59 motion is marked as “filed” on July 29, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on July 30. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the judgment or order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Terry D. Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and the district court’s order denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Jones , No. CR-95-37 (E.D. Va. June 10, 1998; July 30, 1998). * See also Brown v. Angelone , 150 F.3d 370 (4th Cir. 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 13,101.

#### Hutchinson *v.*Riley et al.

(14 P. [2d] 1118)

Decided September 19, 1932.

Mr. Isaac Mellman, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendants in error.

Messrs. Mokrissey, Mahoney & Scofield, amicus curiae.

Judgment affirmed in department on application for supersedeas without written opinion. Mr. Chief Justice Adams, Mr. Justice Butler, Mr. Justice Hilliard and Mr. Justice Alter participating.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe evolution of energy-transducing systems. Studies with an extremely halophilic archaebacteriumThe halobacterial ATPase was labeled with C-14-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide and subunit 2 of the enzyme was prepared by electroelution. Subunit 2 was cleaved by several chemical and enzymatic procedures for further preparation of peptides. Immunoreactions (Western blotting) of halobacterial membranes were performed with an antiserum against subunit A of the vacuolar ATPase from Neurospora crassa. A 85 K band (subunit 1) from the membranes of H saccharovorum and from two halobacterial isolates, which were isolated from Permian salt sediments, reacted strongly with the antiserum. The ATPase from the latter isolates resembled the ATPase from H saccharovorum, but had a higher content of acidic amino acids. If it can be verified that the age of the bacterial isolates is in the same range as when deposition of salt occurred, an extremely interesting system for the study of evolutionary questions would be available, since the salt-embedded bacteria presumably did not undergo mutational and selectional events.Document ID19910018410Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsStan-Lotter, Helga*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1991Subject CategoryLife Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA-CR-188641NAS 1.26:188641Accession Number91N27724Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-578Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910018410.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5225 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

10 Broadway Street West in Akeley, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Neal Kenneth 

Todd Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2022 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Ms. SMITH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 10 Broadway Street West in Akeley, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Neal Kenneth Todd Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NEAL KENNETH TODD POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 10 Broadway Street West in 

6 Akeley, Minnesota, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Neal Kenneth Todd Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5225 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Neal Kenneth Todd 

3 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# TS 351 Wireless Transmitter 

# INSTRUCTION MANUAL

Before operating the unit , please read this manua l thoroughly, and retain it for future referen ce .

# 1.. Pin Descriptions



# DC IN



# -

1 

# - VOUT VIDEO IN AUDIO I

### Ctt1 CH2 

# mm CH3 CH4

# ~ ,__ 1.,..

,11..,.1 1 

### 005 CH6

# ~~ CH7 CH8

# ~**liii II~** **U** 3, Application examples 

# D

.-------, + Power Supply 1---'-----' 

### or BAttery 7- 11 - 

# 2



# ..

## 4. PRODUCT TECH SPECIFICATION MODE: TS351 5.8G 200mW 8 Channel AV Transmitter Modulate Wideband FM Modulat e Video Format NTSC / PAL Value Units Characteristics Min . Typ. Max. 1 Output Impedance 

## --- 50 

## -- O hm 2 Output Power 2 1 22 23 d Bm Channel Frequency CH1 

### --· - 5 705 

## --- MH z CH2 

## --- 5685 

### --- MH z CH3 

## --- 5665 

## --- MH z 3 CH4 

## --- 5645 

## -- MHz CH5 

## -- - 5885 

### --· - M Hz CH6 

## --- 590 5 

## --- MH z CH7 

## --- 5925 

## --- MH z CH8 

## --- 5945 --- MHz 4 Operating Voltage 7 .0 12 1 5 

### v 5 Supply current 

## - - - 150 

## --- rnA 6 VOUT Voltage VOU T= D C I N 

### v 7 Operating Temperature - 10 

## --- +85 

# ·c 8 Video Band Width 0


### --- 8 . 0 MH z 9 Audio carrier Frequency


### --- 6.5 

## --- MH z 10 Video Input Level 0 .8 1 .0 1 .2 Vp-p 11 Video Input Impedance 

## --- 75 

## --- Ohm 12 Audio Input Level 0 .5 

## --- 2 . 0 Vp- p 13 Audio Input Impedance - - - 1 0 K 

## --- O hm 14 Weight 

## --- 25 

## --- 9 15 Antenna Connector S MA Connecto r 16 Dimensions (L x W x H) 55x26x17 mm 

# 3

# RC802 RC 805 Wireless Receiver INSTRUCTION MANUAL

Before operating the unit, please read this manual thoroughly, and retain it for future reference
.

## NOTICE PROCEEDINGS: Please conenct every part according to the instruction, please not take down and refit this product, otherwise, it will lead to product damage and out of the related law items. 

## 1. PRODUCT FUNCTION INDICATION:



# 1) Receiver (RC 802, RC 805)



## 2) AV Cable Channel Indicator Light



## ---Antenna

L...------AV Output1 L....--------AV Output2 L....---------Power Input

Video Output-- Audio Output--- 

# 1

## 2. CHANNEL OPTIONAL OPERATION: 1 ) PRODUCT USE CUTLINE 

# )))

Monitoring Display



# 2

## 4. PRODUCT TECH SPECIFICATION PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS

MODEL Receiving frequency 2370-251 OM Hz ; 8channels Receiving sensitivity -90dBm Frequency control built-in frequency and phase lock loop RC802 WIRELESS Double lines AV output analog AV signal output RECEIVER Inside the needle Antenna connectors Power supply voltage 6 . 5-12V Supply current 150mA Dimens ion 72x54x16mm (alum i num s a ll oy extrusi o n profiles) Receiving frequency 5725-5865MHz ; 8channels Receiving sensitivity -90dBm RCBOS Frequency control bu i lt-in frequency and phase l ock loop WIRELESS RECEIVER Double lines AV output analog AV signal output Antenna connectors Inside the needle Power supply voltage 6.5-12V Supply current 150mA Dimension 72x54x 16mm (alum i nums alloy extrus io n profi les ) OPERATING -1 0'C - +50 ' C I +14 r - +122 r TEMPERATURE STORAGE -2o ·c - +so ·c t -4 "F - + 140 r TEMPERATURE

OPERATING 85 % RH HUMIDITY 

# 3
No: III-23-004 February 14, 2023 

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662 

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663 

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at Perry Nuclear Power Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Jim Beavers 

as the new senior resident inspector at the Perry Nuclear Power Station, 

located in Perry, Ohio, 35 miles northeast of Cleveland. 

Beavers joined the NRC in 2009 as an emergency preparedness 

inspector in Lisle, Illinois, at the Region III office. He served both as a 

resident inspector and acting senior resident inspector at the Duane 

Arnold nuclear power plant. He has also been an acting resident 

inspector at the Davis-Besse, LaSalle and Perry nuclear power plants. In 

2019, he worked as the senior resident inspector at the Clinton Nuclear 

Power Station. 

Beavers served six years in the U.S. Navy aboard the USS 

Tecumseh in various roles, including as submarine propulsion plant supervisor. Subsequently, he 

worked in the nuclear industry as an NRC-licensed reactor operator and as a senior reactor operator 

instructor. Beavers also worked with the International Atomic Energy Agency as an emergency 

preparedness and response officer. 

“Jim brings in-depth knowledge of plant operations, training, and emergency preparedness 

with extensive experience implementing the Reactor Oversight Process. His work in nuclear reactor 

safety, both domestically and internationally, will help him carry out the agency’s safety mission,” 

said NRC Region III Administrator Jack Giessner. “He has all of the qualifications to be an 

outstanding senior resident inspector at Perry.” 

Beavers holds a bachelor’s degree in applied science and technology from Thomas Edison 

State College (now known as Thomas Edison State University). 

Each commercial nuclear power plant site in the United States has at least two resident 

inspectors who monitor day-to-day operations. Beavers joins NRC resident inspector Tyrone 

Ospino at the Perry plant. They will serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting 

inspections and monitoring significant work projects.
DONALD CRAIG GORE , Appellant,

v. MICHAEL D. CREWS, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D 12

- 907

_____________________________/ Opinion filed September 2, 2014. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County

. Julian E. Collins , Judge

. Appellant Donald Craig Gore, pro se . Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney Genera l, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee. Barbara Debelius, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee.

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal of a final order in Circuit Court Case No. 2011

- 41

- CA dismissing a pet ition for writ of habeas corpus in which Appellant, a prison inmate, alleged his entitlement to immediate release . The trial court issued its rulingwithout affording Appellee an opportunity to show cause concerning whether Appellant was properly awarded all jail, prison, and gain

- time credit . On Appellee’s proper concession of error , we reverse the order and remand with instructions that the trial court issue an order for Appellee to show cause regarding (1) whether Appellant has been properly awarded al l jail, prison, and gain

- time
credits that are due under the law and as set forth in Gisi v. State , 4 So. 3d 613 (Fla. 2009), and Rabedeau v. State , 2 So. 3d 191 (Fla. 2009), and (2) whether such an award would affect Appellant’s consecutive 21

- year senten ce . To ensure consistent rulings on substantially similar issues, we direct the trial court to
consolidate this case and Circuit Court Case No. 2012

- 178

- CA ( appealed as
#1D12

- 2828) for further proceedings

. REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.
ROBERTS , RAY , and SWANSON , J J

. , CONCUR.

2
### §99. Maine

Maine constitutes one judicial district.

Court shall be held at Bangor and Portland.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 881; Pub. L. 95–573, §2, Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2458.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §160 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §85, 36 Stat. 1114; Dec. 22, 1911, ch. 7, 37 Stat. 51; Sept. 8, 1916, ch. 475, §§1, 3, 39 Stat. 850; Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 279, 42 Stat. 1506).

Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–573 struck out provision for two separate divisions, (1) the Northern Division comprising the counties of Aroostook, Hancock, Penobscot, Piscataquis, Somerset, Waldo, and Washington and (2) the Southern Division comprising the counties of Androscoggin, Cumberland, Franklin, Kennebec, Knox, Lincoln, Oxford, Sagadahoc, and York.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–573 effective 180 days after Nov. 2, 1978, see section 6 of Pub. L. 95–573, set out as a note under section 93 of this title.
June 20, 2011 

Mr. Douglas S. Forslund 

Director, New Iberia Support 

Bristow U.S. LLC 

4605 Industrial Drive 

New Iberia, LA 70560 

Dear Mr. Forslund: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 91.411(b)(2) and 91.413(c)(2) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It 

explains why we can’t process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can’t Process Your Request 

We entered your March 30, 2011, exemption request on behalf of Bristow U.S. LLC into the 

public docket (No. FAA-2011-0329), but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent doesn’t comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy 

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us the following: 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

 The specific reasons why you need to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside 

the United States. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to 

send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption. 
2 

If We Don’t Hear From You 

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda D. Courtney 

Manager, Aircraft and Airport 

 Rules Division

Enclosure
### §194A. Contributions to employer liability trusts

#### (a) Allowance of deduction

There shall be allowed as a deduction for the taxable year an amount equal to the amount—

(1) which is contributed by an employer to a trust described in section 501(c)(22) (relating to withdrawal liability payment fund) which meets the requirements of section 4223(h) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, and

(2) which is properly allocable to such taxable year.

#### (b) Allocation to taxable year

In the case of a contribution described in subsection (a) which relates to any specified period of time which includes more than one taxable year, the amount properly allocable to any taxable year in such period shall be determined by prorating such amounts to such taxable years under regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

#### (c) Disallowance of deduction

No deduction shall be allowed under subsection (a) with respect to any contribution described in subsection (a) which does not relate to any specified period of time.

(Added Pub. L. 96–364, title II, §209(c)(1), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1290, §194; renumbered §194A, Pub. L. 97–448, title III, §305(b)(1), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2399.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 4223(h) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, referred to in subsec. (a), is classified to section 1403(h) of Title 29, Labor.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1983 Amendment

Pub. L. 97–448, title III, §311(c)(2), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2411, provided that: "The amendments made by subsection (b) of section 305 [redesignating section 194 of this title, relating to contributions to employer liability trusts, as this section] shall take effect on October 14, 1980."

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 96–364, title II, §210, Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1291, provided that:

"(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the amendments made by this title [amending sections 401, 404, 411 to 414, 4971, and 4975 of this title] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 26, 1980].

"(b) Subpart C of part I of subchapter D of chapter 1 of such Code (as added by this Act) [sections 418 to 418E of this title] shall take effect, with respect to each plan, on the first day of the first plan year beginning on or after the earlier of—

"(1) the date on which the last collective-bargaining agreement providing for employer contributions under the plan, which was in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 26, 1980], expires, without regard to extensions agreed to after such date of enactment, or

"(2) 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 26, 1980].

"(c) The amendments made by section 209 [enacting this section and amending sections 501 and 4975 of this title] shall apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 26, 1980]."
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Frank Ross, Defendant. In the Matter of the Application of John Meehan and Lewis M. Jones, Respondents, for a Remission of the Forfeiture of Bail in an Action Entitled The People of the State of New York v. Frank Ross.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.