alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1390. Scope

(a) Venue Defined.—As used in this chapter, the term "venue" refers to the geographic specification of the proper court or courts for the litigation of a civil action that is within the subject-matter jurisdiction of the district courts in general, and does not refer to any grant or restriction of subject-matter jurisdiction providing for a civil action to be adjudicated only by the district court for a particular district or districts.

(b) Exclusion of Certain Cases.—Except as otherwise provided by law, this chapter shall not govern the venue of a civil action in which the district court exercises the jurisdiction conferred by section 1333, except that such civil actions may be transferred between district courts as provided in this chapter.

(c) Clarification Regarding Cases Removed From State Courts.—This chapter shall not determine the district court to which a civil action pending in a State court may be removed, but shall govern the transfer of an action so removed as between districts and divisions of the United States district courts.

(Added Pub. L. 112–63, title II, §201(a), Dec. 7, 2011, 125 Stat. 762.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 112–63, title II, §205, Dec. 7, 2011, 125 Stat. 764, provided that: "The amendments made by this title [enacting this section, amending sections 1391 and 1404 of this title, and repealing section 1392 of this title]—

"(1) shall take effect upon the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 7, 2011]; and

"(2) shall apply to—

"(A) any action that is commenced in a United States district court on or after such effective date; and

"(B) any action that is removed from a State court to a United States district court and that had been commenced, within the meaning of State law, on or after such effective date."
###### Editorial Note on Part 126

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 126.604 Who decides if a contract opportunity for HUBZone set-aside competition exists?

The contracting officer for the contracting activity makes this decision.
### Part B—Public Services and Accommodations Under Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
### **CHAPTER 161—UNITED STATES AS PARTY GENERALLY**

Sec.
2401.
Time for commencing action against United States.
2402.
Jury trial in actions against United States.
2403.
Intervention by United States or a State; constitutional question.
2404.
Death of defendant in damage action.
2405.
Garnishment.
2406.
Credits in actions by United States; prior disallowance.
2407.
Delinquents for public money; judgment at return term; continuance.
2408.
Security not required of United States.
2409.
Partition actions involving United States.
2409a.
Real property quiet title actions.
2410.
Actions affecting property on which United States has lien.
2411.
Interest.
2412.
Costs and fees.
2413.
Executions in favor of United States.
2414.
Payment of judgments and compromise settlements.
2415.
Time for commencing actions brought by the United States.
2416.
Time for commencing actions brought by the United States—Exclusions.

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### 1949 Act

This section amends the analysis of chapter 161 of title 28, U.S.C., to conform item 2411 therein with the catch line of section 2411 of such title as amended by another section of this bill.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–481, title II, §204(b), Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2329, substituted "Costs and fees" for "Costs" in item 2412.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–381, §6, Aug. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 1120, inserted "or a State" after "United States" in item 2403.

**1972**—Pub. L. 92–562, §3(b), Oct. 25, 1972, 86 Stat. 1177, added item 2409a.

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–505, §2, July 18, 1966, 80 Stat. 305, added items 2415 and 2416.

**1961**—Pub. L. 87–187, §2, Aug. 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 416, substituted "and compromise settlements" for "against the United States" in item 2414.

**1954**—Act July 30, 1954, ch. 648, §2(b), 68 Stat. 589, struck out "denied" in item 2402.

**1949**—Act May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §118, 63 Stat. 105, substituted "Interest" for "Interest on judgments against United States" in item 2411.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Edward McElleney, Respondent, against New York Dock Company, Appellant. State-Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 20

- 00 593

- C R

IN RE James MYART

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Luz Elena Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 23, 2020

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

Relator James Myart file d a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in which he asks th is

court to order the trial court to set a bond or release relator pending a hearing on the State’s motion

to ad judicate guilt. Myart is represented by counsel in the trial court; therefore, he is not entitled

to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State , 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The

absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be treated

as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id .; see also Gray v. Shipley , 877 S.W.2d 806,

806 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1 st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for

a writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 201 7 CR 0945 , styled The State of Texas v. J ames Willie Myart, Jr. , pending

in the 1 86 th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Jefferson Moore presiding.
IdentifiedTECHNOLOGIESIDENTIFIEDTECHNOLOGIESCORPORATIONRequestforAmendmentstoFAA333UASExemptionExemptionNo.12089RegulatoryDocketNo.FAA-2015-QSS6Contact:BradCossinV.P.Aviation&Regulation6534HamiltonAvePittsburgh,PA15206Bcossin@identifiedtech.com412.974.3060Date: January 12, 2016 Re: Exemption
No. 12089 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0556 To Whom

It May Concern: As the UAV manufacturer, Identified Technologies Corporation

is requesting amendments

to their existing 333 exemption

as listed and described below. The purpose for the amendments

is to be able to offer the services

as listed
in the existing 333 exemption

in a safer more efficient manner and to update the FAA with the most up to date information regarding Identified Technologies Corporation
and its operations. Each amendment
will serve to increase the safety, functionality
and usefulness

of UAS's with the intention

to create safer working environments

in the industries

in which they are deployed. 

### 1. Additional Aircraft Types Identified Technologies Corporation would like to add the following additional UAS operating platforms

to the existing exemption. 

### A. The 

### Boomerang

- is a quadrotor designed in-house using commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components. Manufacturer: Identified Technologies Corporation.

By using

a collection of best-in-class components, Identified Technologies Corporation

is able to construct

a very reliable vehicle, with additional features and incorporates
the 3D Robotics PixHawk auto pilot system
as listed

in the current 333 exemption conditions and limitations paragraph

1. The Boomerang meets all weight, speed and other criteria spelled out in the current 333 exemption. The Boomerang UAS was designed primarily for data collection applications.
The proprietary pilot operating handbook (POH) will be emailed directly
to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. 

### B. The 

### 3DR IRIS+ Quadcopter-

is kit built production model. The 3DR IRIS+ Quadcopter meets all weight, speed and other criteria spelled out in the current 333 exemption. The 3DR IRIS+ (915) Quadcopter
will be used primarily for flight training and data collection applications. The pilot operating handbook (POH) will be emailed directly
to 333exemptions@faa.gov Please do not hesitate
to contact me with any questions. Thank you for your time
in this matter. Brad Cossin. V.P Aviation



### & Regulation. 412.974.3060. Bcossin@identifiedtech.com
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23021]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Southwest Washington Provincial Advisory Committee Meeting Notice

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Southwest Washington Provincial Advisory Committee will 
meet on Wednesday, October 27, 2004, at the Ward Road Fire Hall 
<greek-i>88 in Orchards/Vancouver, WA, 6701 NE 147th Ave., Vancouver, 
WA 98682. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until 3 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to share information on the following 
programs: An update on current activity at Mount St. Helens; a 
Washington State Department Ecology assessment of Gifford Pinchot 
National Forest stream temperatures; the Western Washington Sustainable 
Harvest Environmental Impact Statement for State lands; an update on 
the Forest Service Region 6 invasive species Environmental Impact 
Statement, and to share information among members.
    All Southwest Washington Province Advisory Committee meetings are 
open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend. The 
``open forum'' is scheduled to occur at 1 p.m. Interested speakers will 
need to register prior to the open forum period. The committee welcomes 
the public's written comments on committee business at any time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Tom Knappenbeger, Public Affairs Officer, at (360) 891-5005, 
or write Forest Headquarters Office, Gifford Pinchot National Forest, 
10600 NE 51st Circle, Vancouver, WA 98682.

    Dated: October 6, 2004.
Claire Lavendel,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 04-23021 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
ORDER – 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0558

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL ANDREW BUCK,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of 

record, and good cause appearing therefore; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant-Appellant in this 

matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of the 

date of this Order. The response must be served upon all counsel of 

record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and 

Appellate Counsel’s Office. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give notice 

of this Order by mail to all counsel fo record and to Defendant-Appellant

at his last known address. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 14 2020

07/14/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0558
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-069 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(May 7, 1997)

NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON PROPOSED REGULATORY GUIDANCE

FOR POWER REACTOR LICENSEES MAKING CHANGES TO FACILITIES OR

PROCEDURES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment

on proposed regulatory guidance for a section of its rules that

defines the conditions under which reactor licensees may make

changes in their facilities or procedures without prior NRC

approval.

Current NRC regulations (Part 50.59 of Title 10 of the Code

of Federal Regulations) permit a licensee to make changes in a

facility or in procedures and to conduct tests and experiments

without prior NRC approval if they do not present an unreviewed

safety question. But in 1995, this regulatory framework came

into question after it became known that refueling practices at

the Millstone 1 plant in Connecticut violated commitments made in

the plant safety analysis report when the facility was licensed.

After a review of the regulatory process, the NRC staff found

that, although the rule provides needed flexibility for

licensees, some problems have arisen when NRC staff and industry

have interpreted the rule differently.

As a result, the NRC staff is considering issuing additional

regulatory guidance. Before proceeding further, the NRC is

seeking comments and suggestions from industry and members of the

public. Comments should be mailed to: Chief, Rules Review and

Directives Branch, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20555. Written comments may also be handdelivered to 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, between

7:45 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on Federal workdays.

Comments may also be submitted electronically through the

NRC Electronic Bulletin Board on FedWorld. The request for

public comment has been published in the May 6 edition of the

Federal Register and has been posted on the NRC Homepage at

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/NUREGS/SR1606/index.html. Any proposed

rule developed as a result of comments received and deliberations

by NRC staff will be published in the Federal Register for public

comment before adoption in final form.
#
### §3. Commissioner; appointment and tenure of office; compensation

The Bureau of Labor Statistics shall be under the charge of a Commissioner of Labor Statistics, who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate; he shall hold his office for four years, unless sooner removed, and shall receive a salary.

(June 27, 1884, ch. 127, 23 Stat. 60; June 13, 1888, ch. 389, §2, 25 Stat. 182; Mar. 18, 1904, ch. 716, 33 Stat. 136; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §3, 37 Stat. 737.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Act June 13, 1888, raised salary from $3,000 to $5,000 per annum.

Act Mar. 18, 1904, changed name of Department of Labor to Bureau of Labor.

Act Mar. 4, 1913, authorized the substitution of "Commissioner of Labor Statistics" and "Bureau of Labor Statistics" for "Commissioner of Labor" and "Bureau of Labor", respectively.

Words "of five thousand dollars per annum" at end of section were omitted as superseded by the Classification Acts. See sections 5101 et seq. and 5331 et seq. of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of Labor, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Labor, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 6 of 1950, §§1, 2, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
# o(

BOX 737 - P E LICAN, ALASKA 99832 - PH ONE: 735 - 2202/2203 - FAX: 735 - 2258 - EMAIL: c ityh all@ p e li ca ncity. o rg - W EBSI TE: www. p elica n.n et August 27 , 2014 Harris Aircraft Services , Inc. 400 Airport Road Sitka, Alaska 99835 To Whom it May Concern , This is a letter of support for Harris Aircraft Services , Inc .' s application for an Air Carrier Certificate , which will allow for an improved schedule and the transport of mail for the U.S
. Postal Service
. This is a Public Convenience and Necessity for expanded service that Harris Air can provide . Harris Air provides important air service to Pelican and other rural remote coastal communities in southeast Alaska . Residents from Pelican often travel to Sitka for medical services . Customers call Harris Air to see if there are any flights: Sitka to Pelican or Pelican to Sitka. Also, important marine services a n d supplies can be ordered out of Sitka for transport to Pelican, especially critical during the fishing season. Pelican is seeing more travelers from Sitka to Pelican , thereby expanding opportunities to Pel ican's economy and transportation options. Thank you , . .

## 7~~**~** 

# ·

_ ) Patricia Phillips

# ~ Mayor

O FF I CE O F T HE MAYO R - PU B LI C W ORKS DEPART M ENT- PELI CAN H EALTH C LI N I C - P ELICAN VO L U NTEE R FIRE D E PART MEN T
§ 353.3 Definitions. As used in this part, the following terms and concepts are defined: ( a ) *FEMA* means the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
( b ) *NRC* means the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
( c ) *Certification* means the written justification by a licensee of the need for Federal compensatory assistance, as authorized in 44 CFR part 352 and E.O. 12657.
( d ) *Technical assistance* means services provided by FEMA to facilitate offsite radiological emergency planning and preparedness such as provision of support for the preparation of offsite radiological emergency response plans and procedures; provision of advice and recommendations for specific aspects of preparedness such as alert and notification and emergency public information.
( e ) *Licensee* means the utility which has applied for or has received a license from the NRC to operate a commercial nuclear power plant.
( f ) *Governor* means the Governor of a State or his/her designee.
( g ) *RAC* means Regional Assistance Committee chaired by FEMA with representatives from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Agriculture, Department of Transportation, Department of Commerce and other Federal Departments and agencies as appropriate.
( h ) *REP* means FEMA's Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program.
( i ) *Fiscal Year* means Federal fiscal year commencing on the first day of October through the thirtieth day of September.
( j ) *Federal Radiological Preparedness Coordinating Committee* is the national level committee chaired by FEMA with representatives from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Interior, Department of Energy, Department of Transportation, United States Department of Agriculture, Department of Commerce and other Federal Departments and agencies as appropriate.
§ 334.1 Purpose. ( a ) Provides policy guidance pursuant to the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended; section 1-103 of Executive Order 12148, as amended, which includes functions continued from E.O. 11051; section 104(f) of Executive Order 12656; and part 2 of Executive Order 10480.
( b ) Establishes a Graduated Mobilization Response (GMR) system for developing and implementing mobilization actions that are responsive to a wide range of national security threats and ambiguous or specific warning indicators. GMR provides for a coherent decision making process with which to proceed with specific responses to an identified crisis or emergency.
( c ) Provides guidance to the Federal departments and agencies for developing plans that are responsive to a GMR system and for preparing costed option packages, as appropriate, to implement the plans.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-80961-DMM

EDIT GONCZI,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HOLLYWOOD BEACH, LLC,

a Florida limited liability company,

Defendant.

__________________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, EDIT GONCZI, and Defendant, HOLLYWOOD BEACH, LLC, having 

amicably resolved all matters in controversy between them, jointly stipulate to a Dismissal with 

Prejudice, with each party to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs, and request the Court enter 

the attached Order of Dismissal. The Parties request this Court retain jurisdiction for ten days to 

enforce the terms of the Parties’ settlement agreement.

Dated: December 29, 2020

/s/ James A. Peterson

James A. Peterson, Esq. 

Fla. Bar No. 645621

E-Mail: James@floridawagelaw.com

ROBERT S. NORELL, P.A.

300 N.W. 70th Avenue

Suite 305

Plantation, FL 33317

Tel.: (954) 617-6017

Fax: (954) 617-6018

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Catherine H. Molloy

Catherine H. Molloy

Florida Bar No. 33500

West A. Holden

Florida Bar No. 0113569

GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A.

101 E. Kennedy Boulevard Ste. 1900 

Tampa, Florida 33602

(813) 318-5700 – Telephone

(813) 318-5900 – Facsimile

Email: molloyk@gtlaw.com

Email: holdenw@gtlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 9:20-cv-80961-DMM Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/29/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served in the manner 

indicated below on December 29, 2020 on all counsel or parties of record appearing on the Service 

List below.

By: /s/James A. Peterson

James A. Peterson

Service List

CASE NO.: 20-cv-80961-DMM

James A. Peterson, Esq.

E-Mail: James@floridawagelaw.com

Robert S. Norell, Esq.

E-Mail: Rob@floridawagelaw.com

ROBERT S. NORELL, P.A.

300 N.W. 70th Avenue

Suite 305

Plantation, Florida 33317

Telephone: (954) 617-6017

Facsimile: (954) 617-6018

Counsel for Plaintiff

Catherine H. Molloy

E-Mail: molloyk@gtlaw.com

West A. Holden

E-Mail: holdenw@gtlaw.com

GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A.

101 E. Kennedy Boulevard

Suite 1900

Tampa, Florida 33602

Telephone: (813) 318-5700

Facsimile: (813) 318-5900

Counsel for Defendant

Method of Service: CM/ECF

Case 9:20-cv-80961-DMM Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/29/2020 Page 2 of 2
## Keith Salazar, Assessment Manager



# Preliminary **Materials for**  **the IRIS Assessment of**  **Ethyl tert** 

**- butyl**  **ether (ETBE)** 

**Office of Research and Development** National Center for Environmental Assessment, Integrated Risk Information System **December 12, 2013 1**  

## General Information • ETBE is a colorless liquid with a strong odor similar to gasoline, varnish or ether. • Possible application of ETBE as an oxygenate for gasoline. 

## Exposure • May occur through interaction with gasoline containing ETBE. • General population could be exposed to vapors while refueling automobiles or by drinking contaminated groundwater. 

## Assessment History • 2009 - External peer review identifies additional JPEC studies.**2 3**  

## Preliminary Materials for the IRIS Assessment of ETBE : • Draft literature search strategy • Draft literature search results • Preliminary evidence tables • Preliminary exposure- response arrays *These materials are available online at: http://w ww.epa.gov/iris/publicmeeting/iris_bimonthly-dec2013/mtg_docs.htm**4** 

### Literature Search Strategy •The literature search identified more than 700 studies for ETBE. • 90 references are being considered for the assessment after an initial screen for relevance. 

### Data Extraction to Evidence Ta bles • 33 references directly informing hazard identification are described in evidence tables. 33 studies in evidence tables**5** 

## Features of the ETBE Database

**Chronic Subchronic**  **Tw o**  **- Gen**  **Repro/ Dev**  **MOA**

**Information PBPK**  Oral     Inhalation    

• Human data on exposures to ETBE consist of a human TK study**6** 

### Endpoints with Data for Evaluating Hazard • Kidney Effects • Liver Effects • Reproductive and Developmental Effects • Cancer • Other Systemic Effects • Genotoxic Effects 

### Scientific Considerations • PBPK modeling

– Metabolized to tert

- butanol & acetaldehyde • Kidney MOA

– Alpha2u -globulin -associated nephropathy

– Chronic progressive nephropathy (CPN) • Liver MOA

– PP AR

– PXR/CAR

– ALDH2**7** 

## EP A welcomes all comments, such as : • Clarity and transparency of materials • Additional approach for identifying studies • Selection of studies for data extraction • Study quality considerations • Additional studies that may inform the assessment