alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3872.1 Protest against mineral applications. ( a ) At any time prior to the issuance of patent, protest may be filed against the patenting of the claim as applied for, upon any ground tending to show that the applicant has failed to comply with the law in any matter essential to a valid entry under the patent proceedings. Such protest cannot, however, be made the means of preserving a surface conflict lost by failure to adverse or lost by the judgment of the court in an adverse suit. One holding a present joint interest in a mineral location included in an application for patent who is excluded from the application, so that his interest would not be protected by the issue of patent thereon, may protest against the issuance of a patent as applied for, setting forth in such protest the nature and extent of his interest in such location, and such a protestant will be deemed a party in interest entitled to appeal. This results from the holding that a co-owner excluded from an application for patent does not have an “adverse” claim within the meaning of R.S. 2325 and 2326 (30 U.S.C. 29, 30). (See Turner v. Sawyer, 150 U.S. 578-586, 37 L. ed. 1189-1191.)
( b ) A protest by any party, except a Federal agency, must include the processing fee for protests found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter.
[35 FR 9760, June 13, 1970, as amended at 70 FR 58880, Oct. 7, 2005]
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5218 

To amend the civil rights remedies equalization provision of the Rehabilitation 

Act Amendments of 1986 to clarify civil rights remedies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2022 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, 

Mr. BOOKER, Mr. BROWN, Mr. CASEY, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. KAINE, Mr. SANDERS, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the civil rights remedies equalization provision 

of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1986 to clarify 

civil rights remedies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clarifying Civil Rights 

5 Remedies Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSES. 

7 (a) PURPOSES.—The purposes of this Act are— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5218 IS

1 (1) to remedy and deter violations of rights 

2 guaranteed under section 504 of the Rehabilitation 

3 Act of 1973, section 1557 of the Patient Protection 

4 and Affordable Care Act, title IX of the Education 

5 Amendments of 1972, the Age Discrimination Act of 

6 1975, and title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 

7 by safeguarding the availability of damages for emo8 tional harm in actions alleging violations of these 

9 laws; and 

10 (2) to invoke the sweep of congressional author11 ity, including the power to enforce the Equal Protec12 tion Clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitu13 tion of the United States and to set the terms on 

14 which Congress disburses Federal money under the 

15 Spending Clause of section 8 of article I of the Con16 stitution, in order to remedy and deter discrimina17 tion on the basis of disability, race, color, national 

18 origin, age, and sex that people face every day. 

19 SEC. 3. CIVIL RIGHTS REMEDIES. 

20 Section 1003 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments 

21 of 1986 (42 U.S.C. 2000d–7) is amended— 

22 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub23 section (c); 

24 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol25 lowing: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 5218 IS

1 ‘‘(b) COMPENSATORY DAMAGES.—Remedies at law 

2 available for a violation of a section or other provision re3 ferred to in subsection (a)(1), in a suit against any entity, 

4 private or public, including a State, shall include all types 

5 of compensatory damages, including damages for emo6 tional harm.’’; and 

7 (3) by amending subsection (c), as amended by 

8 paragraph (1), to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The provisions of sub10 section (a) shall take effect with respect to violations that 

11 occur in whole or in part after October 21, 1986. Sub12 section (b) shall take effect with respect to violations for 

13 which a court has not rendered a final decision on the 

14 date of enactment of the Clarifying Civil Rights Remedies 

15 Act of 2022.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
----

----

III Bekendmakingen

Europees Geneesmiddelenbureau

----

AANWERVING VOOR HET EUROPEES GENEESMIDDELENBUREAU (LONDEN)

(2006/C 27 A/01)

Het Geneesmiddelenbureau is belast met de coördinatie van de beoordeling van en het toezicht op geneesmiddelen voor menselijk en diergeneeskundig gebruik in de Europese Gemeenschap (zie Verordening (EG) nr. 726/2004 van het Europees Parlement en de Raad, Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie L 136 van 30 april 2004). Het Bureau, dat in januari 1995 is opgericht, staat in nauw contact met de Europese Commissie, de 25 EU-lidstaten, de EER/EVA-landen en tal van groeperingen in de openbare en particuliere sector.

Nadere informatie over het Geneesmiddelenbureau en zijn activiteiten is te vinden op internet op het webadres http://www.emea.eu.int.

Het Europees Geneesmiddelenbureau organiseert selectieprocedures met het oog op het vaststellen van een reservelijst voor de volgende functie:

EMEA/A/222: Medisch hoofdmedewerker

(Senior Medical Officer) (A*12)

Geselecteerde sollicitanten worden op een reservelijst geplaatst; afhankelijk van de begrotingsmiddelen kan hun een contract van vijf jaar, met mogelijkheid tot verlenging, worden aangeboden, overeenkomstig de Regeling welke van toepassing is op de andere personeelsleden van de Europese Gemeenschappen (Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 56 van 4 maart 1968).

De standplaats is Londen.

Sollicitanten moeten onderdaan zijn van een lidstaat van de Europese Unie, IJsland, Noorwegen of Liechtenstein, op voorwaarde dat zij in het bezit zijn van al hun rechten als staatsburger.

Alle voorwaarden, de taakomschrijvingen en het benodigde sollicitatieformulier moeten gedownload worden van de website van het Europees Geneesmiddelenbureau:http://www.emea.eu.int/htms/general/admin/recruit/recruitnew.htm.Het sollicitatieformulier moet van een datum en een handtekening worden voorzien en met de nodige bewijsstukken uiterlijk op 17 maart 2006 (het poststempel geldt als bewijs) worden gezonden naar het volgende adres:EMEA — Head of Personnel, 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London E14 4HB, United Kingdom (Tel. (44-207) 418 84 00; fax (44-207) 418 84 16).

Het Publicatieblad wordt vanaf heden niet langer automatisch naar verzendlijsten gestuurd. Als u op de hoogte wilt worden gesteld van publicaties in verband met vacatures, kunt u zich daarvoor on line opgeven op http://www.emea.eu.int/„Online Mailing Service”.

----
Exhibit 13

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F ofHDFC Bank Limited, (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of such officers
knowledge, that:

1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of March 31, 2008 and for the periods presented in the Report.

The foregoing certification is provided
solely for the purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.



|                          |  |  |  |                    
|------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------
|Dated: September 23, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Aditya Puri    
|                          |  |  |  | Aditya Puri        
|                          |  |  |  | Managing Director  
|                          |  | 
|Dated: September 23, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Sashi Jagdishan
|                          |  |  |  | Sashi Jagdishan    
|                          |  |  |  | Head Finance
### §715. Staff attorneys and technical assistants

(a) The chief judge of each court of appeals, with the approval of the court, may appoint a senior staff attorney, who shall be subject to removal by the chief judge with the approval of the court.

(b) The senior staff attorney, with the approval of the chief judge, may appoint necessary staff attorneys and secretarial and clerical employees in such numbers as the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts may approve, but in no event may the number of staff attorneys exceed the number of positions expressly authorized in an annual appropriation Act. The senior staff attorney may remove such staff attorneys and secretarial and clerical employees with the approval of the chief judge.

(c) The chief judge of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, with the approval of the court, may appoint a senior technical assistant who shall be subject to removal by the chief judge with the approval of the court.

(d) The senior technical assistant, with the approval of the court, may appoint necessary technical assistants in such number as the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts may approve, but in no event may the number of technical assistants in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit exceed the number of circuit judges in regular active service within such circuit. The senior technical assistant may remove such technical assistants with the approval of the court.

(Added Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §120(c)(1), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 34.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as an Effective Date of 1982 Amendment note under section 171 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
<CURRENCY>  U.S.  DOLLARS


                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                       JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                         JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                                1
<CASH>                                                                 3,703,908
<SECURITIES>                                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          2,945,352
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                              228,928
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       8,689,162
<PP&E>                                                                 7,033,568
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         5,621,068
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        10,726,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                6,075,499
<BONDS>                                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                                  92,672
<OTHER-SE>                                                             4,276,458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                10,726,229
<SALES>                                                                9,203,459
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      10,925,102
<CGS>                                                                  1,305,804
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          1,944,218
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       8,385,877
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        22,195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          641,819
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      641,819
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             641,819
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                                .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                .06



<PAGE>



</TABLE>
#### Dominico Pagano, Appellant, v. Louis Pagano et al., Respondents.

Close,' P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-172 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, August 10, 1999)

NRC BEGINS REVIEW OF DOE’S DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

ON YUCCA MOUNTAIN WASTE REPOSITORY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has started its review of the Draft Environmental

Impact Statement issued by the Department of Energy (DOE) Friday on the impacts of the

disposal of nuclear waste in a possible future repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada.

A 16-member NRC review team will include experts in geology; hydrology; mechanical,

nuclear, materials and geotechnical engineering; geochemistry; performance assessment;

quality assurance; health physics; transportation and law. Specialists from the Center for

Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses in San Antonio, the NRC’s independent federally funded

research and development center, will participate and provide additional expertise in a wide

range of disciplines. The staff is preparing a review plan that it will use to guide the NRC’s

review. The review plan will be posted on the NRC’s Internet web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/NMSS/DWM/ymdeisrp.htm. Comments developed by the team will be

reviewed by the Commission itself before being forwarded to DOE by the end of a 180-day

public comment period on February 9.

The Nuclear Waste Policy Act, which requires DOE to evaluate Yucca Mountain’s

suitability for a waste disposal facility, mandated that the Department prepare an environmental

impact statement (EIS) to meet the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act and

that it submit the EIS, and the NRC’s comments on it, to the President if DOE recommends that

the President approve the site for the development of a repository.

If, after receiving DOE’s recommendation, the President considers the site qualified for

construction of a repository, the President must submit a recommendation to the Congress. If

the Congress permits the recommendation to take effect, DOE must then submit an application

to the NRC for authorization to construct the facility. Along with the application, DOE must

submit a final environmental impact statement, which will include NRC’s comments on the draft

environmental impact statement. Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the NRC will

adopt the EIS to the extent practicable to satisfy the NRC’s obligations under the National

Environmental Policy Act as part of any possible construction authorization decision.

###
#### § 2.1 Purpose.

This part collects and displays the control numbers assigned to information collection requirements of FEMA by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). FEMA intends that this part comply with the requirements of section 3507(f) of the Paperwork Reduction Act, which requires that agencies display a current control number assigned by the Director of OMB for each agency information collection requirement.
<PAGE>                                 
                                 
                                 

                                                         EXHIBIT 11

                         WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
 COMPUTATION OF INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
          (In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
                             (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 
                                 
                                 Three Months Ended          Nine Months Ended
                                    September 30,             September 30,
                                ------------------        ---------------------
                                 1997          1996        1997           1996
                                ------        ------      ------         ------          

<S>                          <C>          <C>          <C>           <C>
PRIMARY

Net income (loss)            $    3,883   $   (2,841)  $    9,362    $      589
Preferred dividends                   -            -            -        (1,448)
                             ----------   ----------    ---------    ----------
Net income (loss)
 applicable to
 common shares               $    3,883   $   (2,841)  $    9,362    $     (859)
                             ==========   ==========   ==========    ==========



Weighted average number
 of common and common
 equivalent shares
 outstanding                 14,394,633   14,210,653   14,390,062    13,891,578

Adjustment to reflect
 common shares issued
 during the twelve months
 prior to the initial
 public offering as out-
 standing for all periods
 presented using the
 "treasury stock" method              -            -            -       172,180
                             ----------   ----------   ----------    ----------

Weighted average number of
 common and common equivalent
 shares outstanding          14,394,633   14,210,653   14,390,062    14,063,758
                             ==========   ==========   ==========    ==========



Income (loss) per common and
 common equivalent share:

Net income (loss)            $      .27   $     (.20)  $      .65   $      .04
                             ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

Net income (loss) applicable
 to common shares            $      .27   $     (.20)  $      .65   $     (.06)
                             ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
</TABLE>


There  is  no  significant difference between primary and fully  diluted
income (loss) per share.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Jay Tillow, Respondent, against Daystrom Corporation et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by employer and insurance carrier from a decision and award of a referee in a workmen’s compensation case. Claimant injured his back *1046while lifting some material used or sold in his employment. He was given hospital treatment on two separate occasions without complete cure. All the physicians who have examined him, including his own, recommended that a myelogram test be performed to determine if a lumbar root protrusion exists. Claimant has refused to submit to such a test. There is medical testimony to the effect that his refusal to submit to such a test is unreasonable and there is no evidence to the contrary, except fear expressed by claimant. The decision appealed from directs the employer and carrier to provide claimant with psychiatric treatment to persuade him to take the test. Award and decision reversed on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Poster and Deyo, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Michael Frank Connor, certify that:

         1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, and all reports
on Form 8-K and Form 8-K/A containing distribution or servicing reports filed in
respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc., on behalf of PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-1;

         2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

         4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

         5.   The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
compliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar
standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling
or servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and
its officers and agents.


          Date: March 30, 2004                     /s/ Michael Frank Connor
                                                   -------------------------
                                                   Michael Frank Connor
                                                   President
No: 24-009 February 1, 2024 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC to Hold a Public Meeting Feb. 15 in Port Lavaca, Texas

to Discuss Licensing Process for X-energy/Dow Advanced Reactor Project

Staff from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a meeting in Port Lavaca, 

Texas, on Feb. 15 to discuss the agency’s process for licensing nuclear power plants. 

The NRC is preparing for X-energy and The Dow Chemical Company to apply for a 

construction permit for a proposed multi-unit advanced reactor facility at Dow’s Seadrift site in 

Calhoun County. The meeting aims to improve the community’s understanding of how the 

agency reviews such applications and how the community can participate. 

The meeting will be held from 5-7:30 p.m. Central time at the Bauer Community Center, 

2300 TX-35 North in Port Lavaca. The staff will discuss the NRC’s safety and environmental 

review processes for a construction permit and then take questions from the public.
#### John E. Smith, Respondent, v. Murray Borushik et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00300

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.J.M. and H.J.M., Children

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 29724

Honorable Sergio J. Gonzalez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that Nichole Martin recover her costs of this appeal from Ariel

Mejia.

SIGNED Mar ch 18, 2015.

_____________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice