alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2
 
 Ener1,
Inc.
 1540
Broadway, Suite 25C
 New York,
New York 10036
 
 November
9, 2009
 
 Securities
and Exchange Commission
 100 F
Street, NE
 Washington,
DC 20549
 
 Re:
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350
 
 Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ener1, Inc.,
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, I, Gerard A. Herlihy, Chief Financial Officer of Ener1,
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1)
              such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
 
 2)
              the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ener1,
      Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Ener1, Inc.
  /s/
      Gerard A. HerlihyGerard
      A. Herlihy
                      Chief
      Financial Officer
                      (Duly
      Authorized Principal Financial and Principal
                      Accounting
      Officer and Duly Authorized
Officer)
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
 
 This
certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to Ener1, Inc.’s
quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
filing.
### §538. Investigation of aircraft piracy and related violations

The Federal Bureau of Investigation shall investigate any violation of section 46314 or chapter 465 of title 49.

(Added Pub. L. 103–272, §4(e)(1), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1361.)
1

The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3708

___________

Rheshie Doobay, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern

Iowa State University of Science and * District of Iowa.

Technology; Iowa State Board of * 

Regents; James Judy, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 23, 1999

Filed: May 10, 1999

___________

Before BEAM and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and MOODY,1

 District Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Rheshie Doobay, a plant services supervisor for Iowa State University(ISU),

appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of ISU Science and Technology, ISU

Board of Regents, and James Judy. Doobay alleges unlawful employment

discrimination and retaliation because of his national origin, race, and/or color in
2The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

2–

violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (Title VII), Iowa Code Chapter 216 and 42

U.S.C. § 1981. The charges arise out of a decision by ISU to demote Doobay

following an internal investigation. At the conclusion of the internal investigation,

Doobay was found to have violated ISU's sexual harassment policy. 

Having reviewed the record in connection with the parties' briefs, we conclude

as did the district court,2 that there is no genuine issue of material fact and summary

judgment is appropriate. Extensive analysis would serve no useful precedential

purpose. We therefore affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Dane R. Saglio, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EntreMed, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5, 2003)]
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: August 9, 2004 /s/ Dane R. SaglioDane R. SaglioChief Financial Officer
19
EXHIBIT 12.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dan Goldstein, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the annual report on Form 20-F of
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: December 19, 2005

            /s/ Dan Goldstein
            -----------------
            Dan Goldstein
            Chairman of the Board and
            Chief Executive Officer
            (Principal Executive Officer)
From: "Schmidt Cortney" <CKSchmidt@vcsmc.com>

To: John Summerhays/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Cc: <FDindoffer@BODMANLAW.COM>, "Cox Dirk" <DACox@vcsmc.com>, "Straw Ann" 

<ALStraw@vcnainc.com>, "Gower Matthew" <MMGower@vcsmc.com>

Date: 09/28/2012 10:57 AM

Subject: Phone conversation with John Summerhays

John,

During our most recent phone conversation this week you asked me two questions, one if we wanted

enforcement personnel at our Oct 10 meeting and I said no to that question.  The other request was that

I send a cleaner copy of the graph that was on page 14 of our submittal.  Please find enclosed a larger

version of that graph on the Power Point attachment.

Cortney Schmidt

SMC EM typical time and temp profile page 14 chart to USEPA 2012.pptx
§ 314.2 Federal Interest. ( a ) Subject to the obligations and conditions set forth in this part and in relevant provisions of 2 CFR part 200, Project Property vests upon acquisition in the Recipient (or, if approved by EDA, in a Co-recipient or Subrecipient). Project Property shall be held in trust by the Recipient for the benefit of the Project for the Estimated Useful Life of the Project, during which period EDA retains an undivided equitable reversionary interest in the Property (the “Federal Interest”). The Federal Interest ensures compliance with EDA Project requirements, including those related to the purpose, scope, and use of a Project. The Recipient typically must secure the Federal Interest through a recorded lien, statement, or other recordable instrument setting forth EDA's Property interest in a Project (*e.g.,* a mortgage, covenant, or other statement of EDA's Real Property interest in the case of a Project involving the acquisition, construction, or improvement of a building. See § 314.8.).
( b ) When the Federal Government is fully compensated for the Federal Share of Project Property, the Federal Interest is extinguished and the Federal Government has no further interest in the Property, except as provided in § 314.10(e)(3) regarding nondiscrimination requirements.
[82 FR 57059, Dec. 1, 2017]
#### § 208.35 Reimbursement for Advisory.

DHS will not reimburse costs incurred during an Advisory.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION EN BANC

Appellate case name: Victor Anthony Charles v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-11-00084-CR

Trial court case number: 1258695

Trial court: 183rd District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: September 16, 2013

Party filing motion: Victor Anthony Charles

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale 

 Acting Individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, Sharp, 

Massengale, Brown, and Huddle

Date: October 10, 2013
#### Russell Root v. Walter Pulitzer and Others.

Motions to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless appellant complies with terms stated in order. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### Julia Finn et al., Respondents, v. Mercy Hospital Association, Inc., et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J,, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
#### Nathan Hart, appellee, v. G. H. Dietrich, appellant.

Filed July 3, 1903.

No. 13,002.

Partnership: Equity: Accounting. A partner who, without notice to or knowledge of his copartner, takes substantially all of the ready money of the firm and absconds, remaining away eight months without disclosing his whereabouts, has no standing in equity to demand an accounting after his copartner has wound up the business and paid the partnership debts.

Appeal from the district court for Box Butte county: William H. Westover, District Judge.

*Reversed and dismissed.*

*R. O. Noleman,*for appellant.

*William Mitchell, contra.*

Pound, C.

This is a suit for accounting. The parties were partners in'Ufé sáldon business at Alliance, the plaintiff residing at that point, while defendant liúsd fit'' Crawford, some fifty-eight miles distajit. , .'On ¿felp'%#805$ü $JainÉMf]»itáithiitíás,* "dffe# ‘ 6ut 'siffistáñíMüy all ■^én¿r^yíríopeTS,.,|¿J" tlíe bank, took |he cash on hand in the salWn,’' anct abscondéS Wliéré'he 'went or for what purpose, he does not inform us. But he was gone some eight months, during which time he did not communi^t^,,, Jpsf^$J»tner or with his family; nor was any one able to ascertain what had become of him. The deSrendaiu^ wüd Seems' t’o'iiave been the re¡rpofisible1; íhéíübéU fifi‘the pil'd its débts,. for *686an accounting. The referee, who heard the evidence, found for the defendant; but the court sustained exceptions to the report and entered a decree for the plaintiff, which is now appealed from.

Without going into the somewhat complicated details of the accounting, we are of opinion that the decree ought not to be suffered to stand. Whether or not the purchase, earnings, and disposition of a roulette wheel are proper subjects for a court of equity, a partner who, in times of financial stress, such as prevailed in 1895, absconds with the ready money of the firm and leaves his copartner to settle the business as best he can, has no standing in a court of equity to demand an accounting, when it turns out that the business was closed up successfully. Defendant was on the spot to meet the claims of creditors. He was compelled to see that they Avere paid. If the partnership property did not suffice, he Avas liable. The plaintiff ran no risk. If a deficit resulted, he had only to stay aAvay. If the property paid the debts, he could turn up and call for an accounting. Unless the maxim that he who comes into equity must come with clean hands has lost all virtue the plaintiff’s case has no place in a court of equity, and should be dismissed.

It is recommended therefore that the decree be reversed and the cause dismissed.

Duffie and Kirkpatrick, CC., concur. .

By the Court: For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the action dismissed.

Reversed.
39–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–222 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 889, COAST 

GUARD AND MARITIME TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 2005 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mrs. CAPITO, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 440] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 440, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 889, the 

Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2005, under a 

modified open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate 

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

bill. The rule provides that the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure now printed in the bill shall be considered as an original bill for the purpose of amendment. The rule waives all points 

of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The rule provides that the bill shall be considered for 

amendment under the five-minute rule and that it shall be read by 

title. 

The rule makes in order only those amendments to the bill that 

are pre-printed in the Congressional Record or are pro forma 

amendments for the purpose of debate. The rule provides that each 

amendment printed in the Congressional Record may be offered 

only by the Member who caused it to be printed or a designee, and 

that each amendment shall be considered as read. The rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

2 

Finally, the rule allows the Speaker to entertain a motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 3768 on the legislative day 

of Thursday, September 15, 2005. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The Committee is not aware of any points of order against consideration of the bill. The waiver of all points of against consideration of the bill is prophylactic in nature. 

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Willbros Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael F. Curran,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Michael F. Curran
-----------------------

Michael F. Curran
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22973]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 04-111]


NASA Space Science Advisory Committee, Solar System Exploration 
Subcommittee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a 
meeting of the NASA Space Science Advisory Committee (SScAC), Solar 
System Exploration Subcommittee (SSES).

DATES: Thursday, October 21, 2004, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and Friday, 
October 22, 2004, 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: NASA Headquarters, Room 9H40, 300 E Street, SW., Washington, 
DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Michael H. New, Science Mission 
Directorate, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, 
DC 20546, (202) 358-1766, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4924202a21282c25672167272c3e0927283a28672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b0ddd9d3d8d1d5dc9ed89eded5c7f0ded1c3d19ed7dfc6">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:
    <bullet> Status of Solar System Exploration
    <bullet> Status of Mars Exploration Program
    <bullet> Strategic Roadmaps Review Discussion
    <bullet> Transformation and the Subcommittee Structure
    Attendees will be requested to sign a register and to comply with 
NASA security requirements, including the presentation of a valid 
picture ID, before receiving an access badge. Foreign nationals 
attending this meeting will be required to provide the following 
information no less than 3 working days prior to the meeting: full 
name; gender; date/place of birth; citizenship; visa/green card 
information (number, type, expiration date); passport information 
(number, country, expiration date); employer/affiliation information 
(name of institution, address, country, phone); title/position of 
attendee. To expedite admittance, attendees with U.S. citizenship can 
provide identifying information in advance by contacting Marian Norris 
via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e4340415c5c475d6e404f5d4f00494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="690407061b1b001a2907081a08470e061f">[email protected]</span></a> or by telephone at (202) 358-4452. It is 
imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the 
scheduling priorities of the key participants.

R. Andrew Falcon,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-22973 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>