alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61045-61046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23059]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    Notice dated June 1, 2004, and published in the Federal Register on 
June 16, 2004, (69 FR 33666), Siegfried (USA), Inc., Industrial Park 
Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made application by renewal to the 
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of Methadone Intermediate (9254), a basic class of 
controlled substance in Schedule II.
    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substance 
for

[[Page 61046]]

distribution as a bulk product to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Siegfried (USA), Inc. to manufacture the basic class of controlled 
substance listed is consistent with the public interest at this time. 
DEA has investigated Siegfried (USA), Inc. to ensure that the company's 
registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation 
has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security 
systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local 
laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, 
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the 
above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of 
the basic classes of controlled substances listed.

    Dated: September 28, 2004.
William J. Walker,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-23059 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
§ 206.14 Criminal and civil penalties. ( a ) *Misuse of funds.* Any person who knowingly misapplies the proceeds of a loan or other cash benefit obtained under the Stafford Act shall be fined an amount equal to one and one-half times the misapplied amount of the proceeds or cash benefit.
( b ) *Civil enforcement.* Whenever it appears that any person has violated or is about to violate any provision of the Stafford Act, including any civil penalty imposed under the Stafford Act, the Attorney General may bring a civil action for such relief as may be appropriate. Such action may be brought in an appropriate United States district court.
( c ) *Referral to Attorney General.* The Office of Chief Counsel shall expeditiously refer to the Attorney General for appropriate action any evidence developed in the performance of functions under the Stafford Act that may warrant consideration for criminal prosecution.
( d ) *Civil penalty.* Any individual who knowingly violates any order or regulation shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $5,500 for each violation.
[55 FR 2288, Jan. 23, 1990, as amended at 74 FR 15346, Apr. 3, 2009; 74 FR 58850, Nov. 16, 2009]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael Anthony McDONALD, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-7663.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 23, 2006.

Decided: March 6, 2006.

Michael Anthony McDonald, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony McDonald seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4) motion to reconsider a prior order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McDonald has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
### §3193. Establishment

There shall be within the Department of Labor a "Job Corps".

(Pub. L. 113–128, title I, §143, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1539.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
No: 24-002 January 10, 2024 

CONTACT: Office of Public Affairs, 301-415-8200 

Raymond V. Furstenau Named Acting Executive Director for Operations

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced today that 

Raymond V. Furstenau, currently head of the agency’s Office of Research, 

has been named as acting Executive Director for Operations effective 

Jan. 27, upon Daniel Dorman’s retirement and until a permanent replacement 

is selected. 

The EDO position is the highest-ranking NRC career position with 

responsibilities for overseeing the agency’s operational and administrative 

functions and serving as the chief operating officer. 

“Ray is a seasoned executive with exemplary communication and management skills. 

He’s the right person to lead the NRC staff while the Commission works together to identify a 

permanent Executive Director for Operations,” said NRC Chair Christopher Hanson. 

Furstenau joined the NRC in 2018. Previously, he served at the Department of Energy in 

a variety of roles, including acting as Assistant Secretary of Nuclear Energy and working at the 

DOE Idaho Operations Office for more than 28 years. Furstenau served as an officer in the Army 

Finance Corps and in the Army Reserve. He holds a bachelor’s degree in applied science and 

engineering from the U.S. Military Academy and a master’s degree in nuclear science and 

engineering from Idaho State University.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-196 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, September 15, 1999)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

(ACRS) has scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on planning and procedures on

September 29 in Rockville, Maryland.

The subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and the status of filling a

vacancy.

The meeting will be held in room T-2B1 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building,

at 11545 Rockville Pike, beginning at 1:00 p.m.

Those who seek additional information or schedule updates about this meeting should

contact John Larkins, at 301-415-7360.

Other aspects of the meeting will be described in an upcoming edition of the Federal

Register. ACRS meeting notices, transcripts and letter reports are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

###
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-32 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Tuesday., May 25 , 1999)

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MEETING AT VOGTLE

Meeting Is Open To Observation By The Public

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a meeting with the operators of the

Alvin I. Vogtle commercial nuclear power plant, located near Waynesboro, Georgia, at 10:30

a.m. on Friday, May 28, to discuss results of the agency’s latest Plant Performance Review for

the facility. Results of the review are contained in NRC news release 99-22, issued on April 2.

The meeting will be held in the plant’s administrative building auditorium and is open to

observation by members of the public. NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to

answer questions from interested observers and will meet with state and local officials who

attend.

#
#### § 404.12 Can Reclamation provide assistance with the construction of a rural water supply project under this program?

Reclamation may provide assistance with the construction of a rural water supply project developed under this program if Congress specifically authorizes the project and appropriates funds for construction.
EPA Hearing. Chicago. May 24, 2010 

John Bodine Comments on Carbon Pollution Standards 

My name is John Bodine. I'm a resident of Naperville, Illinois and I'm here to support EPA regulations 

for carbon emissions. I have a background in nuclear engineering from the US Navy, a PhD in 

Geophysics, and worked with Amoco Corporation for eighteen years as an oil and gas explorationist. I 

then made a career shift to join a Chicago area manufacturing company managing business systems 

as Chief Information Officer. This blend of engineering, science, and business experience has provided 

a strong basis for understanding the trade-offs and challenges we face with environmental issues 

today. When I retired from my CIO position in 2008, I committed to educating myself on the facts 

concerning climate change so I could be a resource in my community on the issues. I'm motivated by 

wanting to ensure that our world is a decent place to live for our grandchildren and future 

generations. We want to prosper ... in a healthy world. 

Climate and weather are complex processes, difficult to perceive and understand on global scales, but 

I've come to understand that the strong impact of human activities on climate has been clear for at 

least twenty years. Scientific evidence continues to build to reveal that unrestrained pollution of air 

and water are putting us at a level of climate change risk never previously experienced by humans. 

Evidence of past geologic events of comparable magnitude and scale has been clearly associated with 

mass extinctions of diverse life forms. We've been on a very bad path, but are now beginning turn in 

the right direction. We're struggling as individuals, as communities, and as a nation to change our 

culture, habits, and economic dependencies to avoid the worst effects of heating our planet. 

With this sense of the challenge to transform our approach to how we live on our world, I applaud the 

EPA for their work in bringing forward the proposed Carbon Pollution Standard for New Power Plants. 

It is common sense to inhibit further exposure to air pollutants from power plants when the adverse 

effects of carbon emissions and other contaminants are so well understood. It is the role of 

government to help maintain the balance between health and prosperity through policy and 

incentives. The proposed Standards are well designed to avoid negative economic impact while at the 

same time providing great latitude in the approach energy companies can take in producing power. I 

also support applying similar standards to existing power plants, knowing that we must do everything 

we can to eliminate excessive carbon pollution. 

America has the capacity for great innovation and transformational change. Our national culture is 

one of aggressive ambition and individualism, and finding common purpose can be a challenge. When 

we find common purpose, however, we've shown we can change the world. Leadership has never 

been more in need than now, as we face some of greatest global challenges for ensuring prosperity 

and health for future generations.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# See the Bryce Amphitheater

Bryce Canyon National Park
```

[109th Congress Public Law 4]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ004.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 17]]

Public Law 109-4
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant 
program through June 30, 2005, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Mar. 25, 
                         2005 -  [H.R. 1160]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Welfare Reform Extension 
Act of 2005. 42 USC 1305 note.>> assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Welfare Reform Extension Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES BLOCK 
            GRANT PROGRAM THROUGH JUNE 30, 2005.

    (a) In General.--Activities authorized by part A of title IV of the 
Social Security Act, and by sections 510, 1108(b), and 1925 of such Act, 
shall continue through June 30, 2005, in the manner authorized for 
fiscal year 2004, notwithstanding section 1902(e)(1)(A) of such Act, and 
out of any money in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise 
appropriated, there are hereby appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary for such purpose. Grants and payments may be made pursuant to 
this authority through the third quarter of fiscal year 2005 at the 
level provided for such activities through the third quarter of fiscal 
year 2004.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 403(a)(3)(H)(ii) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(3)(H)(ii)) <<NOTE: 42 USC 603.>> is 
amended by striking ``March 31'' and inserting ``June 30''.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL RANDOM SAMPLE STUDY OF CHILD WELFARE 
            AND CHILD WELFARE WAIVER AUTHORITY THROUGH JUNE 30, 2005.

    Activities authorized by sections 429A and 1130(a) of the Social 
Security Act shall continue through June 30, 2005, in the manner 
authorized for fiscal year 2004, and out of any money in the Treasury of 
the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary for such purpose. Grants and 
payments may be made pursuant to this authority through the third 
quarter of fiscal year 2005 at the

[[Page 119 STAT. 18]]

level provided for such activities through the third quarter of fiscal 
year 2004.

    Approved March 25, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1160:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Mar. 14, considered and passed House.
            Mar. 15, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### Merwin K. Hart, Appellant, v. Friends of Democracy, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Present—Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF DECEMBER
31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE REGISTRANT FOR THE
PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1999 TO DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,605
<SECURITIES>                                   718,624
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,791
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,725
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 735,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          679,704
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   735,745
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,842
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,112
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,112
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,112
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.92


</TABLE>
### §5561. Exemptions to meet the requirements of the national defense

The Secretary may temporarily exempt proprietors of distilled spirits plants from any provision of the internal revenue laws relating to distilled spirits, except those requiring payment of the tax thereon, whenever in his judgment it may seem expedient to do so to meet the requirements of the national defense. Whenever the Secretary shall exercise the authority conferred by this section he may prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to accomplish the purpose which caused him to grant the exemption.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1397; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in prior section 5217(b), act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 641, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.
STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DivisionofNI Pollution Coutrol November 12, 2003 

### Mr. James I. Palmer, Jr. Regional Administrator 9thFloor L & CAnnex Nashville, Tennessee 37243-1531

Certified Mail 7002 2410 0005 2409 1168 ReturnReceipt Requested US EPARegion IV APTMD - 14thFloor AtlantaFederal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW. Atlanta GA 30303 -8960 RE: Official Submitt31 ofRegulatory Amendments to the Memphis-Shelby County Portion of the StateImplementation Plan for 

### Tennessee Dear 

### Mr. Palmer: This is an official submittal ofregulatory revisions to the Memphis- Shelby County portion ofthe Tennessee State Implementation 

### Plan (SIP). The Memphis Shelby County Air Pollution Control Board recently adopted by reference several municipal ordinance revisions and regulatory amendments to the Shelby County Air Code. These regulatory actions meet the current requirements of regulation stringency with state air regulations, compliance enforcement and terms of their current certificate of exemption. The local ordinance and code revisions adopted by each jurisdiction are outlined in the MemphisShelby CoUDly Health Department Attachment I technical support documents . As required, three copies are included 

### with supporting documentation consisting ofthe following: a copy ofthe ordinance adopted by each jurisdiction is identified in submittal package Table 1

**~** local Daily News publication of public notice of proposed ordinance SIP

**revisions~** a copy of correspondence/letter filing ofregulatioos priorto adoption by reference; a copy ofthe Tennessee Air Pollution ControlBoard OrderNo.OJ-014, dated November 5, 2003 . The Environmental Protection Agency is requested to process the enclosed regulatory amendments to the City of Memphis Air Pollution Control Code, six satellite mwricipalities• ordinances and the Shelby ;;ounty Air Code portion of the State Implementation Plan for Tennessee.Mr. Palmer Page Two November 10, 2003
If

you or your staffshould have any questions concerning this submittal, please contact Hubie G. Stephens ofmy staffat (615) 532-0558.

**~or** Enclosures 

### cc: Ms. Kay Prince, US EPA, 

### Ms. Anne

### Marie Hoffimm, US EPA Ms. Diane L. 

### Arnst. Memphis, TN. Mr.Hubie G Stephens, DAPC, Nashville, TN Mr. MalcolmH. Butler, DAPC. Nashville, 1N
PALM41KNX46.l.doc
### §§1662 to 1662e. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–220, title I, §199(b)(2), Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1059

Section 1662, Pub. L. 97–300, title III, §321, as added Pub. L. 100–418, title VI, §6302(a), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1536, related to Federal administration.

Section 1662a, Pub. L. 97–300, title III, §322, as added Pub. L. 100–418, title VI, §6302(a), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1536; amended Pub. L. 102–367, title I, §115(b), Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1034, related to Federal delivery of dislocated worker services.

Section 1662b, Pub. L. 97–300, title III, §323, as added Pub. L. 100–418, title VI, §6302(a), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1537, related to allowable activities.

Section 1662c, Pub. L. 97–300, title III, §324, as added Pub. L. 100–418, title VI, §6302(a), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1538; amended Pub. L. 102–367, title III, §303, Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1074, related to demonstration programs.

Section 1662d, Pub. L. 97–300, title III, §325, as added Pub. L. 101–510, div. D, title XLII, §4202, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1852; amended Pub. L. 102–484, div. D, title XLIV, §4467(e), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2751; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XI, §§1136(b), 1137(a), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2878, related to defense conversion adjustment program.

Section 1662d–1, Pub. L. 97–300, title III, §325A, as added Pub. L. 102–484, div. D, title XLIV, §4465(a), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2742; amended Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XIII, §1339, Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1807; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XI, §§1136(a), 1137(b), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2878, 2879, related to defense diversification program.

Section 1662e, Pub. L. 97–300, title III, §326, as added Pub. L. 101–549, title XI, §1101(a), Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2709; amended Pub. L. 102–367, title I, §102(b), Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1024, related to clean air employment transition assistance.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 2000, see section 199(c)(2)(B) of Pub. L. 105–220, set out as a note under section 1501 of this title.
#### Anthony Esposito et al. *v.*Planning Commission of the Town of Westbrook

*Bruce G. MacDermid,*in support of the petition.

Decided February 28, 1986

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 6 Conn. App. 34, is granted.