alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-14 February 24, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC, NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER COMPANY OFFICIALS

TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of the Niagara Mohawk Power Company tomorrow (February

25) to discuss apparent violations of agency requirements at the

Nine Mile Point nuclear power plant. The predecisional

enforcement conference will get under way at 9 a.m. in the public

meeting room at the NRC's Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa.

It will be open to the public for observation only.

Among the apparent violations found by the NRC during recent

inspections at the plant, which is located in Scriba, N.Y., are:

ˇ Inadequate corrective actions regarding debris in the

Unit 2 suppression pool and downcomers. In the event of loss-ofcoolant accident at the plant, the suppression pool, at the base

of the reactor containment building, would be needed to provide

cooling water to the reactor. Foreign materials in this pool and

in the dozens of downcomers, or pipes, leading to it could have

interfered with the flow of this water. The NRC has determined

the suppression pool was not adequately cleaned during a previous

refueling outage.

ˇ Ineffective corrective actions that contributed to a Unit

1 reactor overfill event on November 5, in which a leaking

feedwater regulating valve was putting too much water into the

vessel. A discrepancy with the level instrument resulted in the

water flowing into the main steam lines.

ˇ Numerous examples of weak technical performance and

failure to assure quality in engineering activities.

ˇ Invalid design input used in motor-operated valve

calculations. As a result, the NRC questioned the ability of

four risk-significant valves, in the high-pressure core spray,

reactor core isolation cooling and residual heat removalcontainment spray systems, to open under certain accident

conditions.

ˇ Programmatic deficiencies in implementing the NRC's

maintenance rule for nuclear power plants.
The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference

does not mean that the NRC has determined that violations have

occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the

purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; to provide the licensees with an opportunity

to point out any errors that may have been made in NRC inspection

reports regarding the plant; and to enable the licensee to

outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later time.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel Pediatric Pharmacology Research Units Coordinating Center.                    

*Date:*                         November 5, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Hameed Khan, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6902,                         *khanh@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 12, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-23340  Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 6/30/97
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000894972
<NAME> EVERGREEN MEDIA CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,886
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,040
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,386
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,339
<PP&E>                                          95,597
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,483,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,994
<BONDS>                                        525,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    299,500
<COMMON>                                           422
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,483,513
<SALES>                                        188,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,261
<CGS>                                           27,916
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,725
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,741
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,118
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,259
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,859
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,350)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,190)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
[Exhibit 32.1]



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Med Gen, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report'), I, Jack Chien, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



December 29, 2008



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Paul B. Kravitz    
|Paul B. Kravitz        
|Chief Executive Officer
§ 414.5 Water quality. ( a ) *Water Quality is not guaranteed.* The Secretary does not warrant the quality of water released or delivered under Storage and Interstate Release Agreements, and the United States will not be liable for damages of any kind resulting from water quality problems. The United States is not under any obligation to construct or furnish water treatment facilities to maintain or improve water quality except as may otherwise be provided in relevant Federal law.
( b ) *Required water quality standards.* All entities, in diverting, using, and returning Colorado River water, must: ( 1 ) Comply with all applicable water pollution laws and regulations of the United States, the Storing State, and the Consuming State; and
( 2 ) Obtain all applicable permits or licenses from the appropriate Federal, State, or local authorities regarding water quality and water pollution matters.
Exhibit
4.1


 


DESCRIPTION
OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES


REGISTERED
PURUSANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES


EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED


 


As
of December 31, 2019, Planet Green Holdings Corp. (“we,” “our,” “us” or the “Company”)
had one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”):
its common stock with a par value of $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”).


 


Pursuant
to our articles of incorporation, our authorized capital stock consists of (i) 200,000,000 shares of Common Stock and (ii) 5,000,000
shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share. The following description summarizes the material terms of our capital
stock. For a complete description of the matters set forth herein, you should refer to our articles of incorporation, our bylaws, and
the applicable provisions of Nevada law.


 


Defined
terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.


 


Common
Stock


 


The
holders of the Common Stock shall be entitled to one vote for each share so held with respect to each matter voted on by the stockholders
of the Company. There is no cumulative voting.


 


Liquidation,
Dividend and Preemptive Rights 


 


Subject
to the rights of any outstanding preferred stock, upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company, whether
voluntary or involuntary, the holders of stock shall be entitled to receive all remaining assets of the Company and such assets shall
be distributed ratably among the holders of stock on the basis of the number of shares of stock held by each of them.


 


Dividend
may be paid on the stock as and when declared by the Board of Directors of the Company. No holders of any shares of stock shall, as such
holder, have any rights, preemptive or otherwise, to purchase, subscribe for or otherwise acquire any shares of stock, whether now or
hereafter authorized, which at any time are offered for sale or sold by the Company.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22

-0307

_________________ IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: JOSHUA ARNOLD BACON,

Petitioner and Appellant, and EMILY ANN BACON,

Respondent and Appellee. O R D E R

_________________ Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Troy Kelley is granted an extension of time to and including August 25 , 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the District Court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 28 2022

07/28/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0307
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-020 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, February 6, 1997)

NRC EXTENDS LICENSE TERM

FOR MOST NUCLEAR MATERIALS LICENSEES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is extending to ten years,

from five, the license term for most nuclear materials licensees.

The extension will reduce the administrative burden of

license renewals for both the NRC and the licensee and will

support NRC’s goal of streamlining the licensing process. It

also will bring materials license durations into line with

uranium mill licenses and fuel cycle facility licenses.

The NRC may issue some licenses for shorter terms, if

warranted by the individual circumstances of license applicants.

The current five-year term is not set out in the NRC’s

regulations in most cases. Thus the longer term will be

implemented immediately by NRC decision for most new licenses and

renewals. For licensed medical users of nuclear material,

however, the five-year term was established by regulation. For

those licensees, the NRC plans to develop a rule change that

would permit the license term to be lengthened.

The Commission estimates that about 4000 licenses will be

affected by the license term change. These include, for example,

universities that use radioactive materials in research,

companies that use moisture density gauges containing radioactive

material in road construction, and other industrial users.

The extensions do not apply to nuclear power plant licenses,

which are issued for a 40-year term.

#
#### In the Matter of Nicholas T. Rogers, as Administrator of the Estate of Bruno Burn, Deceased, v. Albert F. Coyle.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
No: II-23-022 June 28, 2023

Contact: Dave Gasperson, 404-997-4417

NRC Begins Special Inspection at Honeywell Uranium Conversion Facility

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection at the Honeywell 

uranium conversion facility in Metropolis, Illinois, to assess a June 21 event where safety 

equipment failed to function during cylinder-filling operations.

Plant workers were filling a cylinder with uranium hexafluoride – known as UF6 – when 

they noticed a small amount of material escaping from a connection point. The workers followed 

plant procedures to remotely activate the valve closing device to stop the operation. When one of 

the remote valves failed to close, a worker closed it manually.

Honeywell reported the event as required by the NRC and suspended all UF6 cylinder filling 

while it investigates the incident. Honeywell also reported that plant personnel were wearing 

appropriate protective equipment during the event.

The NRC special inspection, which began June 28, will focus on how Honeywell inspects 

and maintains the safety controls associated with its cylinder-filling operations. Inspectors also will 

review the facts surrounding the event, the company’s response, and the corrective actions taken to 

prevent a similar safety equipment failure.

The inspection team will document its findings and conclusions in a public report that will 

be issued within 45 days of completing the inspection.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-83024 and No.333-115771) and Form S-8 (No. 333-53552, No. 333-108178 and No. 333-118010) of Tripath Technology Inc. of our report dated December 17, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K/T. 

 

/s/    Stonefield Josephson Inc.

 

San Francisco, CA 

February 3, 2005
Document

Bill of Sale




ENGINE LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION (“Seller”) a company organised and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada, United States of America with its principal place of business at Building 156, Shannon Free Zone, Shannon, Co. Clare, Ireland is the owner of the full legal and beneficial title to the following described engine:


1.one used IAE V2530-A5 aircraft engine bearing Manufacturer's serial number V10150 manufactured by IAE International Aero Engines AG;
2.all appliances, accessories and other items of equipment which are connected, or may be installed in, attached to or used in connection with the engine; and
3.all parts, records, logs, technical data and other materials and documents relating to such engine in the possession of the Seller,
(together the "Engine").
For and in consideration of the payment of the Purchase Price under an engine purchase agreement dated 26 March 2021 (the "Engine Purchase Agreement") made between Seller and Contrail Aviation Leasing, LLC. ("Buyer"), Seller hereby this 30th day of March 2021 grants, conveys, transfers, bargains and sells, delivers and sets over, all of Seller's right, title and interest in and to the Engine unto Buyer.
This Bill of Sale is executed and delivered to Buyer by Seller pursuant to the terms of the Engine Purchase Agreement and the terms "Purchase Price", “Permitted Liens” and "Encumbrance" shall each have the same meaning as set forth in the Engine Purchase Agreement.
Seller hereby warrants to Buyer, its successors and assigns, that there is hereby conveyed to Buyer on the date hereof, good and marketable title to the Engine, free and clear of all Encumbrances but subject to all Permitted Liens with full title guarantee.  Seller agrees with Buyer and its successors and assigns that it will warrant and defend such title forever against all claims and demands whatsoever.
Seller agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Buyer and its successors and assigns from any and all liabilities, damages, losses, expenses, demands, claims, suits or judgments by any third party or parties, including attorney fees, costs and expenses, which arise out of any breach by Seller of the warranty set forth in the preceding Paragraph.
This Bill of Sale is governed by the laws of the State of New York.
 In witness whereof, Seller has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorised officer this 30th day of March 2021.










ENGINE LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION




By:    /s/ Richard Hough


Name:     Richard Hough


Title:    EVP & Chief Technical Officer
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Township of Radnor, :

Appellant : CASES CONSOLIDATED

:

v. : No. 1665 C.D. 2019

:

Goshen Holding Company, Inc. :

and C.F. Holloway, III :

Township of Radnor :

:

v. : No. 1691 C.D. 2019

:

Goshen Holding Company, Inc. and :

C.F. Holloway, III :

:

Appea l of: Jeffrey S. Rosenblum and :

Leonor R. Rosenblum :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, September 11, 2020

, having considered Designated A ppellant

Township of Radnor’s application for reargument /reconsideration and A ppellee s ’

answer in response thereto , the application is denied.
§ 127.305 May declined or decertified concerns seek recertification at a later date? ( a ) A concern that SBA or a third-party certifier has declined or that SBA has decertified may seek certification after ninety (90) days from the date of decline or decertification if it believes that it has overcome all of the reasons for decline or decertification and is currently eligible. A concern that has been declined may seek certification by any of the certification options listed in § 127.300.
( b ) A concern found to be ineligible during a WOSB/EDWOSB status protest or program examination is precluded from applying for certification for ninety (90) days from the date of the final agency decision (the D/GC's decision if no appeal is filed or the decision of SBA's Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) where an appeal is filed pursuant to § 127.605).
[85 FR 27661, May 11, 2020]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-49 May 25, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC STAFF CITES NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY

FOR SPENT FUEL POOL VIOLATIONS AT MILLSTONE 1

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has cited Northeast Nuclear Energy

Company (NNECO) for four violations associated with fuel off-loads before 1993 at the

Millstone Unit 1 nuclear power plant in Waterford, Conn. However, no civil penalties were

proposed.

“Fuel off-load” is the term used to describe the practice of removing fuel from a reactor

when a nuclear power plant is shut down for refueling. “Full-core off-load” means that all of the

fuel has been taken out of the reactor.

The four violations are based on findings by the NRC’s Office of Investigations, which

began looking into allegations in 1994 that full-core off-loads had routinely been performed at

Millstone 1 during refueling outages in violation of the unit’s operating license.

The NRC has concluded that even though the violations did not have safety

significance because safety margins were always preserved, the company acted in careless

disregard when 1.) performing both partial and full-core reactor fuel off-loads before the full

cooldown time assumed in the plant’s Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) without doing a

proper engineering analysis; and 2.) utilizing unapproved and unanalyzed measures to augment

spent fuel pool cooling during refueling outages, without procedures to direct those activities. It

also was found that in two instances the utility submitted incomplete and inaccurate information

to the NRC related to the performance of some fuel off-loads.

In a letter to the company, NRC Region I Administrator Hubert J. Miller said the NRC

staff would normally consider issuing a fine for the violations, but they occurred more than five

years ago and were outside the statute of limitations for issuance of a civil penalty.

Mr. Miller noted that the staff consulted with the Commission and would have exercised

discretion not to issue a fine even if the statute of limitations had not expired because: 1.) these

violations were additional examples of the underlying performance problems at Millstone for

which a $2.1 million civil penalty was issued in December 1997; 2.) the plants were shut down

while the company addressed underlying performance problems; and 3.) the company

essentially replaced the entire management infrastructure since the time these fuel off-load

problems occurred.
In summary, he wrote, “discretion is appropriate because you have already

implemented corrective actions to address the underlying performance problems at Millstone

and further enforcement action is not necessary to achieve additional remedial actions.”

#

EDITORS: The text of the Notice of Violation and Mr. Miller’s letter to the company is posted

on the NRC Internet web site at: www.nrc.gov