alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION
1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF

THE UNITED STATES CODE AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Alfred R. Camner, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Humberto L. Lopez, Chief Financial Officer, of BankUnited Financial Corporation, a Florida
corporation (the Company), each hereby certifies that:



| | (1) |  | The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2005 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                         |  |  |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  |  |  | 
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |  |  |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                        |  | 
|/S/ ALFRED R. CAMNER    |  |  |  | /S/ HUMBERTO L. LOPEZ  
|Alfred R. Camner        |  |  |  | Humberto L. Lopez      
|                        |  | 
|Dated: May 10, 2005     |  |  |  | Dated: May 10, 2005
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-99-46

October 25, 1999

NRC PROPOSES $8,800 FINE FOR ILLINOIS COMPANY

FOR VIOLATIONS INVOLVING RADIOGRAPHY OPERATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed an $8,800

fine against Professional Service Industries (PSI) Inc. of

Lombard, Ill., for failing to adhere to agency safety regulations

during the performance of radiography work.

Based on an investigation by the NRC’s Office of

Investigations (OI) and information gathered during a closed

Predecisional Enforcement Conference on August 24, the NRC has

determined that PSI employees -- despite receiving training

regarding NRC requirements -- committed apparent violations at a

temporary job site in Pocatello, Idaho, on September 15, 1998.

The apparent violations that are the subject of the fine include

a failure to have at least two qualified individuals observing

operations and a failure to supervise a radiography assistant

while work was being done.

In a related action, the NRC has issued an order to the

PSI radiographer involved with the violations. The order bars

him from taking part in NRC-licensed activities for one year.

The order also requires that, for one additional year, the

radiographer notify the NRC within 20 days of his acceptance of

each employment offer involving NRC-licensed activities. The

order is effectively immediately.

The NRC has also issued a Notice of Violation to the

radiography assistant who took part in the activities.

During the evening of September 14, 1998, and the early

morning of September 15, 1998, the radiographer and the assistant

used a radiography camera containing a sealed source of about 60

curies of cobalt-60 to complete panoramic radiography testing of

a large steel tank at the Idaho metal products plant. The

apparent violations were identified during an NRC OI follow-up

investigation of the operation.
Carl J. Paperiello, the NRC’s deputy executive director

for materials, research and state programs, wrote in a letter to

PSI notifying it of the enforcement action that “based on all of

the available evidence, the NRC, in conjunction with OI,

concludes that the individuals deliberately violated NRC

requirements during and after the third and fourth radiographic

shots because they knew or should have known that those actions

were violations of NRC requirements. The NRC is particularly

concerned about the violations involving the deliberate failure

to supervise the assistant radiographer and to follow the twoperson rule.”

In response to the incident, PSI has implemented several

corrective actions, including refresher training for all

radiographers and assistants in the company’s Salt Lake City,

Utah, office, where the team that performed the Idaho work was

based; a complete corporate-level review and investigation of the

circumstances surrounding the apparent violations; and the

creation of a radiography assistant refresher exam.

PSI has 30 days to contest all or part of the enforcement

action.

#
#### Martha V. Flynn, Appellant, v. Timothy A. Flynn, Respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs, without prejudice to application by plaintiff to compel, upon proper demand, the payment of the alimony unpaid since July 1, 1914. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### Ceylon J. Johnson, an Infant, by Grace P. Johnson, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Merrill Tyler, Appellant.

Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Santry and Bergan, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 865.]
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)(as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  I, Lawrence A. Minkoff, certify that:
 
 1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Magna-Lab, Inc.;
 
 2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly  report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.    not used;
 
 4.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)  for the registrant and have:
 
 a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 c)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 d)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Dated: January 18, 2013

By:
/s/    Lawrence A. MinkoffLawrence A. MinkoffPresident (principal executive officer)
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 200 (Monday, October 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23275]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3639]


State of Minnesota

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 
October 7, 2004, I find that Dodge, Faribault, Freeborn, Mower, and 
Steele Counties in the State of Minnesota constitute a disaster area 
due to damages caused by severe storms and flooding occurring on 
September 14, 2004, and continuing. Applications for loans for physical 
damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of 
business on December 6, 2004 and for economic injury until the close of 
business on July 7, 2005 at the address listed below or other locally 
announced locations: Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 
Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the following contiguous counties may be filed 
until the specified date at the above location: Blue Earth, Fillmore, 
Goodhue, Martin, Olmstead, Rice, and Waseca in the State of Minnesota; 
and Howard, Kossuth, Mitchell, Winnebago, and Worth Counties in the 
State of Iowa.
    Dodge, Faribault, Freeborn, Mower, and Steele Counties in the State 
of Minnesota are also eligible under Public Assistance and our disaster 
loan program is available for private non-profit organizations that 
provide essential services of a governmental nature in those counties.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with credit available elsewhere,................      6.375
  Homeowners without credit available elsewhere,.............      3.187
  Businesses with credit available elsewhere,................      5.800
  Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit           2.900
   available elsewhere,......................................
  Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit          4.875
   available elsewhere,......................................
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without           2.900
   credit available elsewhere,...............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 363906. 
For economic injury the number is 9AE800 for Minnesota; and 9AE900 for 
Iowa. The Public Assistance number assigned to Minnesota is P06606.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: October 12, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-23275 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23338]



[[Page 61500]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Review of 
Small Research Grants--(RO3s).
    Date: October 27, 2004.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Double Tree Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Guo HE Zhang, PhD, MD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal 
and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy 
Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20817, 301-451-6524, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#03796b626d646476436e626a6f2d6d6a6b2d646c75"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f2889a939c959587b29f939b9edc9c9b9adc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 12, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-23338 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-22979-CIV-WILLIAMS

EDG HOSPITALITY MIAMI

AIRPORT, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

INDEMNITY INS. CO. OF N. AM., et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’s

Report and Recommendation (DE 22) on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (DE 16). 

Defendants filed no objections to the Report.

Upon an independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable case law, 

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report (DE 22) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (DE 16) is DENIED.

3. Defendants shall answer the Amended Complaint within 14 days of the date 

of this Order. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 1st day of December, 2020.

Case 1:20-cv-22979-KMW Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2020 Page 1 of 1
### §513. Attorney General to advise Secretaries of military departments

When a question of law arises in the administration of the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, or the Department of the Air Force, the cognizance of which is not given by statute to some other officer from whom the Secretary of the military department concerned may require advice, the Secretary of the military department shall send it to the Attorney General for disposition.

(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(c), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 613.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 307. | R.S. §357. |

Statutes at Large

The Department of War was designated the Department of the Army by the Act of July 26, 1947, ch. 343, §205, 61 Stat. 501. "Department of the Air Force" is added on authority of the Act of July 26, 1947, ch. 343, §207(a), (f), 61 Stat. 502. The word "Secretary" is substituted for "head." The words "military department" are substituted for "department" to conform to section 102 of title 5, United States Code, and section 101 of title 10, United States Code. The words "for disposition" are substituted for "to be by him referred to the proper officer in his department, or otherwise disposed of as he may deem proper."
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5211 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5211

  To authorize the use of specialized human trafficking training and 
    technical assistance grants to train law enforcement personnel 
   regarding the Interdiction for the Protection of Children program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 8, 2022

Ms. Cortez Masto (for herself and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the use of specialized human trafficking training and 
    technical assistance grants to train law enforcement personnel 
   regarding the Interdiction for the Protection of Children program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Interdiction for the Protection of 
Child Victims of Exploitation and Human Trafficking Act''.

SEC. 2. INTERDICTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 111(c)(1) of the Violence Against Women 
and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005 (34 U.S.C. 
20708(c)(1)) is amended by inserting ``, which may include programs to 
build law enforcement capacity to identify and respond to human 
trafficking that are funded through the Office of Community Oriented 
Policing Services of the Department of Justice'' before the semicolon 
at the end.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 107(c)(4)(A) of the Trafficking 
Victims Protection Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7105(c)(4)(A)) is amended by 
inserting ``in order to fulfill the purposes described in section 
111(c) of the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice 
Reauthorization Act of 2005 (34 U.S.C. 20708(c))'' before the period at 
the end.
                                 <all>
```
No: II-24-005 April 4, 2024 

Contact: Dave Gasperson, 404-997-4417 

NRC Schedules Virtual Public Meeting to Discuss 

Safety Performance of Westinghouse Facility

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a virtual public meeting for April 10 to 

discuss its two-year safety performance review of the Westinghouse nuclear fuel fabrication facility 

in Hopkins, South Carolina. 

The event will run from 1-3 p.m. Eastern on Microsoft Teams. The conference number for 

those without access to Teams is 301-576-2978, passcode 621367686#. 

The meeting will begin with a short presentation from the NRC staff responsible for 

inspections at the facility, followed by a question-and-answer session. The NRC staff will be 

available to answer questions about the agency’s two-year review of the facility. 

NRC assessed performance at the Westinghouse facility from Jan. 1, 2022, through 

Dec. 31, 2023, in safety operations, safeguards, radiological controls, facility support, and other 

areas. The NRC staff found that Westinghouse continued to conduct its activities safely and met 

NRC requirements for protecting workers, nearby residents, and the environment. 

 The NRC does not have resident inspectors at the Westinghouse facility, but fuel facility 

inspectors from its Atlanta regional office conduct periodic inspections of various aspects of the 

operation. These inspections occur multiple times a year. 

A copy of the NRC letter to the company about the performance is available on the NRC 

website.
§ 123.14 How does the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act of 1990 apply? ( a ) Under the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 3201(e)), a debtor who owns property which is subject to an outstanding judgment lien for a debt owed to the United States generally is not eligible to receive a disaster loan. The SBA Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance, or designee, may waive this restriction as to disaster loans (except IDAP loans) upon a demonstration of good cause. Good cause means a written representation by you under oath which convinces SBA that: ( 1 ) The declared disaster was a major contributing factor to the delinquency which led to the judgment lien, regardless of when the original debt was incurred; or
( 2 ) The disaster directly prevented you from fulfilling the terms of an agreement with SBA or any other Federal Government entity to satisfy its pre-disaster judgment lien; in this situation, the judgment creditor must certify to SBA that you were complying with the agreement to satisfy the judgment lien when the disaster occurred; or
( 3 ) Other circumstances exist which would justify a waiver.
( b ) The waiver determination by the Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance, or designee, is a final, non-appealable decision. The granting of a waiver does not include loan approval; a waiver recipient must then follow normal loan application procedures.
[61 FR 3304, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 75 FR 60598, Oct. 1, 2010]
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Yosemite
National Park
California


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Ranger & Interpretive Programs
 Park ranger talking to visitor at Lower Yosemite FallYosemite offers a range of informative and inspiring walks or talks to learn about Yosemite. All regularly scheduled programs are listed on our calendar. In addition, more information is available about:
Nature & history programs and bus tours by Yosemite Hospitality
Photography walks by The Ansel Adams Gallery
Outdoor Adventures by Yosemite Conservancy
Yosemite Theater by Yosemite Conservancy
 Last updated: September 19, 2023
 Park footer Contact Info Phone: 209/372-0200 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
(March 21, 1949.)

#### Eleanor H. Bowman, Respondent, v. Charles N. Talbot et al., Appellants.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 672.]
#### Mary E. Kipp, Appellant, v. F. W. Woolworth & Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs, on authority of *Kipp*v. *Woolworth*& *Co.*(150 App. Div. 283). Present—Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.