alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 2- 35 44

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Cal vi n J am es Ferg us on
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ct of M in ne so ta - St. Pa ul

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: May 30 , 20 13 Fi le d: May 31, 2 01 3 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, BOW MAN, an d GRUENDER, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Cal vi n F e r gu so n ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s de ni al of hi s 18 U.S.C. 1 § 35 82 (c)( 2) se nt en ce-r ed uc ti on m ot io n ba s ed on Am en dm en t 75 0 to th e Uni te d

The Hon or ab le Don o v a n W

. Fran k, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 Dis tri ct of M in ne so ta

.St at es Sen te nc in g Gui de li ne s. W e fin d no erro r in t h e d i s t ric t co ur t’s fin di ng th at

Ferg us on was no t en ti tl e d to a red uc ti on be cau se he was res po ns ib le fo r m or e th an 2.8 ki lo gr am s of crac k co cai ne , an d th us th e am en dm en t di d no t lo wer hi s ap pl ic ab le

se nt en ci ng ran ge

. See Uni te d St at es v. And ers on , 70 7 F.3 d 97 3, 97 5 (8 th Ci r. 20 13 ) (p er cu ria m ) (d is tri ct co ur t m ay m ak e ne w fact ua l fin di ng s un de r § 35 82 (c)( 2) if th ey
are su pp or te d by reco rd an d co ns is te nt wit h or ig in al se nt en ci ng de te rm in at io n) ; cf. Uni te d St at es v. Fet lo w, 21 F.3 d 24 3, 25 0 (8 t h C i r

. 1 99 4) (s en te nc in g co ur t m ay
co ns id er ev id en ce in tro du ced at tri al of co de fen da nt if th at ev id en ce i s r e l ev an t to di sp ut ed is su e at se nt en ci ng an d se nt en ci ng jud ge pr es id ed ov er co de fen da nt ’s tri al ).

Acco rd in gl y , th e jud gm en t is affi rm ed

. Co un se l’s m ot io n to wit hd raw is gr an te d.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1546-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-1546-DR), dated September 10, 2004, and related determinations. 

# DATES:

Effective October 8, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of North Carolina is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 10, 2004: 

Macon County for Public Assistance. 

Henderson and Jackson Counties for Public Assistance [Categories C through G] (already designated for Individual Assistance and debris removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and B] at 100 percent Federal funding of the total eligible costs for the first 72 hours).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-23322 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
### [§2353. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §138, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 42]

Section, added Pub. L. 91–577, title III, §143(c), Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1559, gave the court of appeals nonexclusive jurisdiction to hear appeals under section 71 of the Plant Variety Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 2461). See section 1295(a)(8) of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as an Effective Date of 1982 Amendment note under section 171 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                    This  schedule   contains  summary   financial   information
                    extracted from the Balance  Sheet,  Statements of Operations
                    and  Statements  of  Cash  Flows,  and is  qualified  in its
                    entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000895464
<NAME>                        Magna-Lab Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                       1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.000
<CASH>                                                 0
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                            16,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   793,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    16,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,424,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (2,414,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      16,000
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 104,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 2,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (106,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (106,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (106,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
§ 351.10 Establishment of committees. ( a ) The Federal Radiological Preparedness Coordinating Committee (FRPCC) consists of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which chairs the Committee, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Transportation, Department of Defense, United States Department of Agriculture, Department of Commerce and, where appropriate and on an ad hoc basis, other Federal departments and agencies. In chairing the committee, FEMA will be responsible for assuring that all agency assignments described in this rule are coordinated through the Committee and carried out with or on behalf of State and local governments.
( b ) The Regional Assistance Committees (RACs), one in each of 10 standard Federal regions,[1] consist of a FEMA Regional Representative who chairs the Committee and representatives from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Transportation, United States Department of Agriculture, Department of Commerce and other Federal departments and agencies such as the Department of Defense, as appropriate. The FEMA Chairperson of the RACs will provide guidance and orientation to other agency members to assist them in carrying out their functions.
Footnotes -
351.10
[1] I (Boston); II (New York); III (Philadelphia); IV (Atlanta); V (Chicago); VI (Dallas); VII (Kansas City); VIII (Denver); IX (San Francisco) and X (Seattle).
### §1607. Counterclaims

In any action brought by a foreign state, or in which a foreign state intervenes, in a court of the United States or of a State, the foreign state shall not be accorded immunity with respect to any counterclaim—

(a) for which a foreign state would not be entitled to immunity under section 1605 or 1605A of this chapter had such claim been brought in a separate action against the foreign state; or

(b) arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the claim of the foreign state; or

(c) to the extent that the counterclaim does not seek relief exceeding in amount or differing in kind from that sought by the foreign state.

(Added Pub. L. 94–583, §4(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2894; amended Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title X, §1083(b)(2), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 341.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–181 inserted "or 1605A" after "section 1605".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

For applicability of amendments by Pub. L. 110–181 to pending cases, see section 1083(c) of Pub. L. 110–181, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1605A of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Oct. 21, 1976, see section 8 of Pub. L. 94–583, set out as a note under section 1602 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 4A—EMPLOYMENT STABILIZATION**

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior chapter 4A, consisting of sections 47 to 47f, act Feb. 23, 1929, ch. 303, §§1–7, 45 Stat. 1260, related to vocational rehabilitation of disabled residents of the District of Columbia.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 5, 2018

d 1128 p 

# Order

Clerk December 5, 2018

158420

In re J. L. THOMAS, Minor. SC: 158420

COA: 342183

Wayne CC Family Division:

17

- 002200

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 14, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu

of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we

REMAND this case to that court. On remand, while retaining jurisdiction, the Court of

Appeals shall remand this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for further consideration. The

trial court shal l determine: (1) whether the trial court ordered a DNA test at Department of

Health and Human Services expense, as stated by the referee, and, if so, whether the testing

occurred; (2) whether the trial court extended the time for the putative father to est ablish

paternity; and (3) whether the putative father was able to speak at the termination trial by

speakerphone and whether he waived any issue regarding the DNA test or the

establishment of paternity by not requesting an adjournment. At the conclusion o f the

hearing, the trial court shall forward the record and its findings to the Court of Appeals,

which shall then reconsider these issues and the issues raised by the appellant in his brief

on appeal.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.1701 Program purpose.

As authorized by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act), SBA establishes the Program to authorize an entity to apply for SBA's guarantee of Pools comprised of portions of First Lien Position 504 Loans backing Pool Certificates to be sold to Pool Investors. The purpose of the Program is to temporarily provide a federal guarantee for Pools of First Lien Position 504 Loans to facilitate the sale of such loans and increase the liquidity of the lenders holding the loans so that the lenders can use the sale proceeds to fund more such loans. The Program's authorization expires on September 23, 2012 and the Administrator may guarantee not more than $3,000,000,000 of pools under this authority pursuant to section 503(c)(B)(iii) of the Recovery Act, as amended by section 1119 of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010.

[61 FR 3235, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 76 FR 63547, Oct. 12, 2011]
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 

**Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4044 — Tietoenator/Tietoenator Government/SAAB/Elesco/Tietosaab Systems JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure Text with EEA relevance***Official Journal C 334 , 30/12/2005 P. 0029 - 0029*

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4044 — Tietoenator/Tietoenator Government/SAAB/Elesco/Tietosaab Systems JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2005/C 334/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

1. On 20 December 2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] by which the undertakings SAAB AB (Sweden) including its subsidiary Elesco Oy (Finland) and TietoEnator Corporation including its subsidiary TietoEnator Government Oy ("TietoEnator", Finland) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of Tietosaab Systems JV ("TSS"), a newly created company constituting a joint venture through the purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for SAAB: Defence company active through Elesco in Command Control and Information system (C2i) and underwater warfare;

- for TietoEnator: information technology systems;

- for TSS: Command and Control information systems (C2i) and underwater warfare.

3. On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4. The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.4044 — Tietoenator/Tietoenator Government/SAAB/Elesco/Tietosaab Systems JV, to the following address:

European Commission

Competition DG

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

--------------------------------------------------
§ 127.403 When will SBA conduct program examinations? ( a ) SBA may conduct a program examination at any time after the concern submits its application, during the processing of the application, and at any time while the concern is a certified WOSB or EDWOSB.
( b ) SBA will conduct program examinations periodically as part of the recertification process set forth in § 127.400.
[85 FR 27664, May 11, 2020]
```

[109th Congress Public Law 16]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ016.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 338]]

Public Law 109-16
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate a United States courthouse in Brownsville, Texas, as the 
         ``Reynaldo G. Garza and Filemon B. Vela United States 
          Courthouse''. <<NOTE: June 29, 2005 -  [H.R. 483]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at the corner of Seventh Street 
and East Jackson Street in Brownsville, Texas, shall be designated and 
known as the ``Reynaldo G. Garza and Filemon B. Vela United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Reynaldo G. 
Garza and Filemon B. Vela United States Courthouse''.

    Approved June 29, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 483:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Apr. 13, considered and passed House.
            June 15, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 352.20 Purpose and scope. This subpart establishes policy and procedures for providing support for offsite radiological emergency planning and preparedness in a situation where Federal support under Executive Order 12657 (E.O. 12657) has been requested. This subpart: ( a ) Describes the process for providing Federal technical assistance to the licensee for developing its offsite emergency response plan after an affirmative determination on the licensee certification under subpart A (44 CFR 352.5(f));
( b ) Describes the process for providing Federal facilities and resources to the licensee after a determination under subpart A (44 CFR 352.6(d)) that Federal resources are required;
( c ) Describes the principal response functions which Federal agencies may be called upon to provide;
( d ) Describes the process for allocating responsibilities among Federal agencies for planning site-specific emergency response functions; and
( e ) Provides for the participation of Federal agencies, including the members of the FRPCC and the RACs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6131

SAMUEL WHALEY; WILLIAM BLACK; ROBERT CHADWICK;

IVAN TURNER; ROBERT REPOVICH,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

EARL BESHEARS, Warden; BISHOP ROBINSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-3965-S)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Whaley, William Black, Robert Chadwick, Ivan Turner, Robert

Repovich, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Whaley v. Beshears, No. CA-95-3965-S (D. Md. Jan. 4, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 20-22916-Civ-COOKE/REID

CHARLTON EDWARD LACHASE,

Plaintiff

vs.

BUTNER FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS MATTER was referred to the Honorable Lisette M. Reid, United States 

Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Administrative Order 2019-2 of 

this Court, for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and 

Recommendation on any dispositive matters (ECF No. 2). On September 16, 2020, Judge

Reid issued a Report of Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 5) recommending that Plaintiff’s case 

be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina

because venue is improper here. Plaintiff has not objected to Judge Reid’s Report and the 

time to do so has passed. 

I have considered Judge Reid’s Report, Plaintiff’s Complaint, the relevant legal 

authority, and have made a de novo review of the record. I find Judge Reid’s Report clear, 

cogent, and compelling. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Judge 

Reid’s Report of Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 5) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. The 

Court directs the Clerk to TRANSFER this case to the Eastern District of North Carolina.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 19th day of October

2020.

 

Case 1:20-cv-22916-MGC Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2020 Page 1 of 2
Copies furnished to:

Lisette M. Reid, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Charlton Edward LaChase, pro se

Case 1:20-cv-22916-MGC Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### § 123.103 What happens if I am forced to move from my home?

If you must relocate inside or outside the business area because local authorities will not allow you to repair your damaged property, SBA considers this to be a total loss and a mandatory relocation. In this case, your loan would be an amount that SBA considers sufficient to replace your residence at your new location, plus funds to cover losses of personal property and eligible refinancing.