alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350



I, Jon Isaac, the President and Chief Executive
Officer of LiveDeal, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of LiveDeal, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LiveDeal, Inc.



|Date:  January 28, 2015 | /s/ Jon IsaacJon IsaacPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to LiveDeal, Inc. and will be retained by LiveDeal, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 206.161 Relocation assistance.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person otherwise eligible for any kind of replacement housing payment under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91-646) shall be denied such eligibility as a result of his being unable, because of a major disaster as determined by the President, to meet the occupancy requirements set by such Act.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-082

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, May 20, 1997)

NRC TURNS DOWN NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH'S APPEAL OF FINE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has rejected an appeal by

the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of a $2,500 civil penalty

proposed last year.

The NRC staff proposed the civil penalty last August. It was

based on NIH's failure to secure from unauthorized removal, or

limit access to, licensed materials present in unattended areas.

The violations occurred at NIH's facilities in Bethesda,

Maryland, and were based on findings of inspections performed in

1995 by both an NRC augmented inspection team and a special

inspection team.

As Federal law permits, NIH protested the NRC's staff's

enforcement action, asking the civil penalty be withdrawn. After

analyzing the NIH protest, the Commission has determined that

there is not an adequate basis for taking the action NIH

requested.

NRC has, therefore, issued an order formally imposing the

fine. NIH has 30 days to ask for a hearing.

###
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Rosa Serrano d/b/a The Lens Factory, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

Pellicano Business Park, L.L.C.,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00327-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2013-DCV-3139)

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed on November 9, 2017. The Court has previously 

granted Appellant five extensions of time in which to file her brief. The Court notified Appellant 

that the most recent extension was final and informed her that no further extension motions would 

be considered. Despite that warning, Appellant has filed a sixth extension motion, and she further 

requests that the record be supplemented with the reporter’s record of a contempt hearing held on 

June 6, 2016. Appellant previously requested preparation of the transcriptions for contempt 

hearings held on June 3, 2016, June 6, 2016, October 5, 2016, and October 18, 2016. In an order 

dated April 3, 2017, the Court ordered that the record would be limited to the hearing held on 

September 15, 2016. The record of the contempt hearings, including the hearing held on June 6, 

2016, is irrelevant to this appeal because the Court does not have jurisdiction to review contempt 

orders in a direct appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to supplement the record is DENIED. 

Further, Appellant’s request for another extension of time in which to file her brief is DENIED. 

The Court hereby gives notice to Appellant of its intention to dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution because she has failed to timely file her brief. All other relief requested in the motion 

is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of November, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
**Exhibit        32(i)**

**Certification        of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley        Act of 2002**

**(i)**
**(ii)**

|                                               |                                                  |                               |
|----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                               | **Waccamaw                Bankshares, Inc.**          |
|                                          |                                             |                          |
| Date:                March                28, 2008 | By:                                         | /s/                James G. Graham |
|                                               | James                G. Graham                        |
|                                               | President&                Chief Executive Officer |

**Certification        of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley        Act of 2002**

**(i)**
**(ii)**

|                                                   |                                                                                   |                                 |
|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                                   | **Waccamaw                  Bankshares, Inc.**                                         |
|                                              |                                                                              |                            |
| Date:                  March                  28, 2008 | By:                                                                          | /s/                  David A. Godwin |
|                                                   | David                  A. Godwin                                                       |
|                                                   | Chief                    Financial and Principal Accounting                    Officer |

----
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 99-16 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson April 5, 1999

OFFICE: 817-860-8128

PAGER: 888-876-2331

E-Mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC FINDS PERFORMANCE ‘ACCEPTABLE’

AT FORT CALHOUN IN LATEST REVIEW

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance remains

acceptable in the NRC’s latest plant performance review at Fort Calhoun Nuclear Plant located

in Fort Calhoun, Nebraska.

Officials of NRC and Omaha Public Power District (OPPD), the utility which operates the

plant, will discuss the review during a meeting set for Monday, April 19, at 2 p.m. in the Fort

Calhoun Training Building Auditorium. The meeting will be open for public observation. NRC

officials will be available afterwards to speak with reporters, state and local officials, and

members of the public.

In a letter to OPPD Division Manager for Nuclear Operations S. K. Gambhir NRC

Branch Chief David N. Graves said, “Overall, performance at the Fort Calhoun Station was

acceptable. Performance in the operations area showed an improving trend. Maintenance and

engineering performance continued to be effective, with no programmatic issues identified.

Plant support performance was characterized by good programs and implementation, but an

increase in negative findings in the area of radiation protection indicated a potential negative

trend.” Only core inspections will be performed in all areas during the next eight months.

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region IV

Office of Public Affairs and the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power plant in

the nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of plant performance

and provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are an interim measure NRC is utilizing to monitor nuclear

power plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after suspending the

Systematic Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a new assessment

program is developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every 12 to 24 months.

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will provide

quarterly performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators and on inspection

findings. This program will be tested at eight plants beginning in June and, if found acceptable,

will be extended to all plants next January. A full description of the new program is available on

the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.
###
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-060 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, April 8, 1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has scheduled a

technical meeting April 15 and 16 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will begin at 1:00

p.m. April 15, and 8:30 a.m. April 16, in Room 2B3 of the NRC's

Two White Flint North building at 11545 Rockville Pike.

Discussions of the Subcommittee on Materials and Metallurgy will

include generic letters regarding steam generator tube inspection

techniques, effective use of ultrasonic testing techniques in

inservice inspection programs, degradation of steam generator

internals, and degradation of reactor vessel head penetrations.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, are described in a Notice of Meeting published in

the April 4 edition of the Federal Register.

#
#### Perry Morgan and Others, Respondents, v. Milan Sherman, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
### §951. Oath of office of clerks and deputies

Each clerk of court and his deputies shall take the following oath or affirmation before entering upon their duties: "I, ______ XXX, having been appointed ______, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will truly and faithfully enter and record all orders, decrees, judgments and proceedings of such court, and will faithfully and impartially discharge all other duties of my office according to the best of my abilities and understanding. So help me God."

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 925.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §512 (R.S., §794; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §291, 36 Stat. 1167).

Section 512 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., applied only to the Clerk of the Supreme Court and clerks and deputies of the district courts.

This section is applicable to the Supreme Court and to all courts established by act of Congress.

The last sentence of section 512 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., reading "The words 'So help me God.' shall be omitted in all cases where an affirmation is admitted instead of an oath," was omitted as unnecessary because on affirmation such words would not be included. As revised, the section conforms with section 453 of this title providing for the form of judicial oath.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61020-61021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23022]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel: Centers for Construction Safety and Health, Request for 
Applications (RFA) OH-04-002

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting:

    Name: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP): Centers for Construction Safety and 
Health, Request for Applications (RFA) OH-04-002.
    Times and Dates: 6 p.m.-6:30 p.m., November 15, 2004 (open). 
6:30 p.m.-8 p.m., November 15, 2004 (closed). 8 a.m.-5 p.m., 
November 16 2004 (closed).
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotels, 1900 Diagonal Road, Alexandria, VA 
23114, phone 703-684-5900.
    Status: Portions of the meeting will be closed to the public in 
accordance with provisions set forth in section 552b(c) (4) and (6), 
Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of

[[Page 61021]]

the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant 
to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to 
Request for Applications OH-04-002.
    Contact Person for More Information: S. Price Connor, Ph.D., 
Research Grants Program Officer, Office of Extramural Programs, 
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC, 1600 
Clifton Road, NE., MS-E74, Atlanta, GA. 30333, Telephone 404-498-
2530.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: October 6, 2004.
Alvin Hall,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 04-23022 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/18 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 12.1
 Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(unaudited)
(dollars in millions)
 Year
    
    
    Year
    
    
    Year
    
    
    Year
    
    
    Yearended
    
    
    ended
    
    
    ended
    
    
    ended
    
    
    endedJune 30,
    
    
    June 30,
    
    
    June 30,
    
    
    June 30,
    
    
    June 30,2007
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2010
    
    
    2011EARNINGS:Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes
    
    $
    (122.5
    )
    
    $
    5.6
    
    
    $
    48.9
    
    
    $
    (58.4
    )
    
    $
    7.9Equity method income
    
    
    (1.0
    )
    
    
    (0.7
    )
    
    
    (0.8
    )
    
    
    (0.9
    )
    
    
    (0.9
    )Fixed charges, exclusive of capitalized interest (a)
    
    
    140.7
    
    
    
    138.6
    
    
    
    124.7
    
    
    
    127.8
    
    
    
    187.1Earnings
    
    $
    17.2
    
    
    $
    143.5
    
    
    $
    172.8
    
    
    $
    68.5
    
    
    $
    194.1FIXED CHARGES:Interest charged to expense (b)
    
    $
    131.6
    
    
    $
    128.4
    
    
    $
    114.0
    
    
    $
    116.8
    
    
    $
    173.6Portion of rents representing interest (c)
    
    
    9.1
    
    
    
    10.2
    
    
    
    10.7
    
    
    
    11.0
    
    
    
    13.5Fixed charges, exclusive of capitalized interest
    
    
    140.7
    
    
    
    138.6
    
    
    
    124.7
    
    
    
    127.8
    
    
    
    187.1Capitalized interest
    
    
    3.0
    
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    2.0
    
    
    
    2.4
    
    
    
    5.6Total fixed charges
    
    $
    143.7
    
    
    $
    140.0
    
    
    $
    126.7
    
    
    $
    130.2
    
    
    $
    192.7Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    n/a
    
    
    
    1.03
    x
    
    
    1.36
    x
    
    
    n/a
    
    
    
    1.01
    xAmount by which earnings are inadequate to
cover fixed charges
    
    $
    126.5
    
    
    
    n/a
    
    
    
    n/a
    
    
    $
    61.7
    
    
    
    n/a
  (a)
    
    Calculated in fixed charges section below.(b)
    
    Excludes interest income. Includes amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount
amortization.(c)
    
    Estimated to be 25% of consolidated rental expense.
Acid Deposition Analysis

 H2SO4 

(g/m2/yr)

 SO2 

(g/m2/yr)

NOx 

(g/m2/yr)

S 

(g/m2/yr)

N 

(g/m2/yr)

Maximum 0.071 0.049 0.012 0.048 0.0037

Average within 10 km Radius 0.0037 0.0069 0.0014 0.0047 0.00043

Average within Study Area 0.0015 0.0025 0.00051 0.0017 0.00016

* Assumes each mole of S results in 2 H+ eqquivilents and each mole of N, HCl and HF result in 1 H+ equivalent

H2SO4 SO2 NOx HCl HF

8.13 355 183 0.239 0.829

Annual Precipitation 21.8 cmyr 218 liter/m2

Baseline Average PH 5.5

Basline Hydronium ions 3.16E-06 H+/liter

Zero buffering calculations:

Max Incremental H+ eq/liter 2.17E-05 Resultant Hydrogen Ions 2.49E-05 Resultant pH

Ave 10 km Incremental H+ eq/liter 8.34E-06 Resultant Hydrogen Ions 1.15E-05 Resultant pH

Ave Area H+ eq/liter 7.41E-06 Resultant Hydrogen Ions 1.06E-05 Resultant pH

Emissions Rates (g/sec)
HCl 

(g/m2/yr) HF (g/m2/yr) H

+

 (equivalents/m2/yr)*

0.0075 0.026 0.0047

0.00058 0.0020 0.0018

0.00027 0.00094 0.0016

 equivalent

Resultant pH 4.60 Delta pH -0.90

Resultant pH 4.94 Delta pH -0.56

Resultant pH 4.98 Delta pH -0.52
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case Number: 20-22698-CIV-MARTINEZ-OTAZO-REYES

VICTOR CASADO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

NAS COMPONENT MAINTENANCE,

INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice [ECF 

No. 9]. Accordingly, it is:

ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, with each party bearing its 

own attorneys’ fees and costs. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case and DENY ANY 

PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 23rd day of September, 

2020.

___________________________________

JOSE E. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies provided to:

Magistrate Judge Otazo-Reyes

All Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-22698-JEM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2020 Page 1 of 1
### [§6166A. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–34, title IV, §422(d), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 315]

Section, added Pub. L. 85–866, title II, §206(a), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1681, §6166; amended Pub. L. 93–625, §7(d)(2), (3), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2115; renumbered §6166A and amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), title XX, §2004(a), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834, 1862, provided for an extension of time for payment of estate tax where estate consists largely of interest in closely held business.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to estates of decedents dying after Dec. 31, 1981, see section 422(f)(1) of Pub. L. 97–34, set out as an Effective Date of 1981 Amendment note under section 6166 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER II—GENERAL POWERS AND DUTIES
Exhibit 23.1
|   |
|--------|

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the use of our reports dated February 23, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TransAlta Corporation (the “Corporation”) as at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010, and internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 of TransAlta Corporation, included as an exhibit to or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 40-F/A) for 2010.

 

We also consent to the use of our audit report dated February 23, 2011 to the Board of Directors of the Corporation with respect to the Reconciliation to United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles as at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010, included as an exhibit to or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 40-F/A) for 2010.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 

 

(1)      Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-72454 and No. 333-101470) pertaining to TransAlta Corporation’s Share Option Plan

 

(2)      Registration Statement (Form F-10 No. 333-170465 and No. 333-162418) pertaining to the registration of Debt and Equity Securities of TransAlta Corporation

 

of our reports dated February 23, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TransAlta Corporation as at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010, internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 of TransAlta Corporation and the Reconciliation to United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010, included as an exhibit to or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 40-F/A) of TransAlta Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

 

Signed “Ernst & Young LLP”

 

Chartered Accountants

 

Calgary, Alberta

August 25, 2011

 

----
#### § 75.14 States exempt under this part.

The following States have submitted applications and adequate supporting documentation and have been determined by the Federal Insurance Administrator to be exempt from the requirement of flood insurance on State-owned structures and their contents because they have in effect adequate State plans of self-insurance: Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Vermont.

[48 FR 44544, Sept. 29, 1983, as amended at 57 FR 19542, May 7, 1992]
### SUBCHAPTER I—FARM LABOR CONTRACTORS