alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
0ctober 30, 2015

Mr. Ravinder Singh Virdi

President Aero Academy International, LLC 308 Grady Montgomery Drive Jackson, TN 38301

Dear Mr. Virdi :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your reque st for an exemption from §§ 141.1 through 141.95 of Ti tle 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why

we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your October 5, 2015 , exemption request on behalf Aero Academy Intern ational,

LLC

. into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 4113 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you mu st send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional info rmation, views, or arguments available to support your request.

In addition, the FAA cannot issue an exemption to someone regulated by a state code, in this

case
, Tenn. Code. Ann. § 49

- 7

- 2004(10) listed in your petition request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days from the date of this letter

. We will consider the docket on
your request open during this period

. Please note that § 11.63(d) requ ires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within the 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you h ave any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

James M. Crotty Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure Code of Federal Regulation § 11.813

Project No.: AXX

- xx

- xxx

- E

Project Officer: ___________

____ ARM

- 104:TAdams:xx/xx/xx:Doc#xxxx

ARM

- 1/100/104:Program Office [or specific OPR routing symbol]

[ Insert Stylewriter Score Here ]

[INSERT ENVELOPE ADDRESS HERE]
§ 112.3 Discrimination prohibited. ( a ) *General.* To the extent that this part applies, no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination by any business or other activity.
( b ) *Specific discriminatory actions prohibited.* ( 1 ) To the extent that this part applies, a business or other activity may not, directly or through contractual or other arrangements, on ground of race, color or national origin: ( i ) Deny an individual any services, financial aid or other benefit provided by the business or other activity;
( ii ) Provide any service, financial aid or other benefit to an individual which is different or is provided in a different manner, from that provided to others by the business or other activity;
( iii ) Subject an individual to segregation or separate treatment in any manner related to his receipt of any service, financial aid or other benefit from the business or other activity;
( iv ) Restrict an individual in any way in the enjoyment of any advantage or privilege enjoyed by others receiving any service, financial aid or other benefit from the business or other activity;
( v ) Treat an individual differently from others in determining whether he satisfies any admission, enrollment, quota, eligibility, membership or other requirement or condition which individuals must meet in order to be provided any service, financial aid or other benefit provided by the business or other activity.
( 2 ) The enumeration of specific forms of prohibited discrimination in this paragraph does not limit the generality of the prohibition in paragraph (a) of this section.
( 3 ) This regulation does not prohibit the consideration of race, color, or national origin if the purpose and effect are to remove or overcome the consequences of practices or impediments which have restricted the availability of, or participation in, a program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin. Where previous discriminatory practice or usage tends, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, to exclude individuals from participation in, to deny them the benefits of, or to subject them to discrimination under any program or activity to which this regulation applies, the applicant or recipient has an obligation to take reasonable action to remove or overcome the consequences of the prior discriminatory practice or usage, and to accomplish the purposes of the Act.
[30 FR 298, Jan. 9, 1965, as amended at 38 FR 17934, July 5, 1973; 68 FR 51349, Aug. 26, 2003]
### SUBCHAPTER II—SPECIAL STATISTICS
### Part A—Youth Employment Demonstration Programs
yearID sourceTypeID sourceTypePopulation

2024 11 140

2024 21 2898

2024 31 2118

2024 32 706

2024 41 4

2024 42 2

2024 43 28

2024 51 3

2024 52 132

2024 53 19

2024 54 32

2024 61 58

2024 62 80
### Devany. Dennis (OST) From: ronaldpatric@charter.net 

### Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 10:03AM To: :' Devany, Dennis (OST) Cc: Swanson, Brian (OST)



### . Subje.t;t: Clinton Co. Airport

Localleigslators have put forth a recommendation to replace Cape Air with Colgan Air as the EAS carrier at Clinton CountyAirport. Please consider NOT approving this recommendation based on the following criteria: 1) Cape Air has and will provide more flights than Colgan Airwill provide. 2) Cape Air has lowerfares than those proposed byColgan Air.
. 3) COlgan Air is requesting a U.S. taxpayer subsidythat is 59% greaterthan Cape Air for reduced service. 4) Cape Air has a proven reliable record of providing EAS at Clinton CountyAirport. Iam not affiliated with Cape Air noremployed or otherwise associated with anything related to airservice at Clinton County Airport or elsewhere. Thank you foryourconSideration, Ron Patrie

1
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.890 Source of interim financing. A Project may use interim financing for all Project costs except the Borrower's contribution. Any source (including a CDC) may supply interim financing provided: ( a ) The financing is not derived from any SBA program, directly or indirectly;
( b ) The terms and conditions of the financing are acceptable to SBA;
( c ) The source is not the Borrower or an Associate of the Borrower; and
( d ) The source has the experience and qualifications to monitor properly all Project construction and progress payments. (If the source lacks such experience or qualifications, SBA may require the interim loan to be managed by a third party such as a bank or professional construction manager.)
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

101 Marietta Street, N.W.

Suite 2900

Atlanta, GA 30323

No: II-97-28 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark (404) 331-5503 (Monday, March 31, 1997)

Roger Hannah (404) 331-7878

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE

TO DISCUSS FARLEY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT CONCERNS WITH LICENSEE

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a predecisional

enforcement conference with Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., in Atlanta

on April 18 to discuss apparent violations associated with air filtration systems

at the Farley nuclear power plant near Dothan, Alabama.

 NRC officials will discuss both design and operational concerns associated

with control room emergency filtration systems, penetration room (the place where

pipes and cables exit the containment building and enter the auxiliary building)

filtration systems, and containment building purge exhaust filtration.

 The meeting will be held in the NRC Atlanta office, located at 101 Marietta

Street, N.W., Suite 2900, from 10:00 a.m. until noon. It will be open to

observation by the public.

 NRC officials said the decision to hold a predecisional enforcement

conference does not mean that a determination has been made that a violation has

occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. The purpose is to discuss

apparent violations, their causes, and safety significance; to provide the

licensee with an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in

NRC inspection reports; and to enable the company to outline its proposed

corrective actions.

 No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement

action, such as a civil penalty, will be made at the conference. Those decisions

will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

#
### §1057. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–280, title I, §108(d), formerly §107(d), Aug. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 820, renumbered Pub. L. 111–192, title II, §202(a), June 25, 2010, 124 Stat. 1297

Section, Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §207, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 865, related to temporary variances from certain vesting requirements.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to plan years beginning after 2007, see section 108(e) of Pub. L. 109–280, set out as an Effective Date of 2006 Amendment note under section 1021 of this title.
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the First Amendment to the Annual Report of NuTech Digital,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Lee Kasper, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



                              /s/Lee Kasper
                              -------------------------------------
                              By:  Lee Kasper
                              President and Chief Financial Officer
                              March 26, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                         223,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  183,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    744,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,503,000
<PP&E>                                         809,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 357,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,010,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,612,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     366,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,010,000
<SALES>                                        499,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               749,000
<CGS>                                          343,000    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,264,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0         
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0         
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12,000     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,819,000) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,819,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0         
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0         
<CHANGES>                                      0         
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,819,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.40)         
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.40)         
                                               


</TABLE>
§ 206.250 General. ( a ) Sections 311 and 406(d) of the Stafford Act, and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, Public Law 93-234, set forth certain insurance requirements which apply to disaster assistance provided by FEMA. The requirements of this subpart apply to all assistance provided pursuant to section 406 of the Stafford Act with respect to any major disaster declared by the President after November 23, 1988.
( b ) Insurance requirements prescribed in this subpart shall apply equally to private nonprofit (PNP) facilities which receive assistance under section 406 of the Act. PNP organizations shall submit the necessary documentation and assurances required by this subpart to the recipient.
( c ) Actual and anticipated insurance recoveries shall be deducted from otherwise eligible costs, in accordance with this subpart.
( d ) The full coverage available under the standard flood insurance policy from the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) will be subtracted from otherwise eligible costs for a building and its contents within the special flood hazard area in accordance with § 206.252.
( e ) The insurance requirements of this subpart should not be interpreted as a substitute for various hazard mitigation techniques which may be available to reduce the incidence and severity of future damage.
[56 FR 64560, Dec. 11, 1991, as amended at 82 FR 44, Jan. 3, 2017]
### §1657. Priority of civil actions

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, each court of the United States shall determine the order in which civil actions are heard and determined, except that the court shall expedite the consideration of any action brought under chapter 153 or section 1826 of this title, any action for temporary or preliminary injunctive relief, or any other action if good cause therefor is shown. For purposes of this subsection, "good cause" is shown if a right under the Constitution of the United States or a Federal Statute (including rights under section 552 of title 5) would be maintained in a factual context that indicates that a request for expedited consideration has merit.

(b) The Judicial Conference of the United States may modify the rules adopted by the courts to determine the order in which civil actions are heard and determined, in order to establish consistency among the judicial circuits.

(Added Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §401(a), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3356.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §403, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3361, provided that: "The amendments made by this subtitle [subtitle A (§§401–403) of title IV of Pub. L. 98–620, enacting this section, amending sections 596, 636, 1364, 2284, and 2349 of this title, section 687 of Title 2, The Congress, section 552 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, sections 8, 136d, 136h, 136n, 136w, 194, 1366, 1600, and 1601 of Title 7, Agriculture, section 1464 of Title 12, Banks and Banking, sections 18a, 21, 45, 57a–1, 78k–1, 687a, 687c, 719h, 1415, 2003, and 2622 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, sections 1463a, 1910, 3117, and 3168 of Title 16, Conservation, sections 1964 and 1966 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, sections 346a and 348 of Title 21, Food and Drugs, section 618 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse, section 640d–3 of Title 25, Indians, sections 3310, 6110, 6363, 7609, 9010, and 9011 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code, sections 110, 160, 660, and 1303 of Title 29, Labor, section 816 of Title 30, Mineral Lands and Mining, section 2022 [now 4302] of Title 38, Veterans' Benefits, section 3628 of Title 39, Postal Service, sections 300j–9, 504, 6508, and 8514 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, sections 1062, 1349, 1652, and 2011 of Title 43, Public Lands, sections 355, 745, 1018, and 1205 of Title 45, Railroads, section 402 of Title 47, Telecommunications, section 2305 of former Title 49, Transportation, sections 792a and 3811 of Title 50, War and National Defense, section 1984 of the former Appendix to Title 50, and sections 30109 and 30110 of Title 52, Voting and Elections, repealing sections 1296 and 2647 of this title, section 28 of Title 15, and section 3614 of Title 42, and amending provisions set out as a note under section 2304 of Title 10, Armed Forces] shall not apply to cases pending on the date of the enactment of this subtitle [Nov. 8, 1984]."
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12

- 20788 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

SOUL MARTINES CRUS, also known as Saul Ruis, also known as Saul Cruz Martinez, also known as Saul Omar Martinez

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12

- CR

- 383

- 1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Soul Martines Crus has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed brief s in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Martines Crus h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief s and
the relevant p arts of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 2, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 12-20788 Document: 00512887978 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/02/2015No. 12

- 20788

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw pursuant to Anders is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Counsel’s motion to withdraw
based on the closing of her law practice is DENIED as unnecessary.

2 Case: 12-20788 Document: 00512887978 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/02/2015
EXHIBIT 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, James F. Verhey, Chief Financial Officer of Kaiser Ventures LLC(the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1. The amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2001 (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                               
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: December 2, 2004 |  | /s/ James F. Verhey           
|                       |  | James F. Verhey               
|                       |  | Executive Vice President & CFO



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace Shuttle 2 Advanced Space Transportation System. Volume 1: Executive SummaryAn investigation into the feasibility of establishing a second generation space transportation system is summarized. Incorporating successful systems from the Space Shuttle and technological advances made since its conception, the second generation shuttle was designed to be a lower-cost, reliable system which would guarantee access to space well into the next century. A fully reusable, all-liquid propellant booster/orbiter combination using parallel burn was selected as the base configuration. Vehicle characteristics were determined from NASA ground rules and optimization evaluations. The launch profile was constructed from particulars of the vehicle design and known orbital requirements. A stability and control analysis was performed for the landing phase of the orbiter's flight. Finally, a preliminary safety analysis was performed to indicate possible failure modes and consequences.Document ID19900017537Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsAdinaro, James N.*(Auburn Univ. AL, United States)*Benefield, Philip A.*(Auburn Univ. AL, United States)*Johnson, Shelby D.*(Auburn Univ. AL, United States)*Knight, Lisa K.*(Auburn Univ. AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 27, 1989Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-185952NAS 1.26:185952Accession Number90N26853Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-4435Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017537.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024