alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §144. Bias or prejudice of judge

Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but another judge shall be assigned to hear such proceeding.

The affidavit shall state the facts and the reasons for the belief that bias or prejudice exists, and shall be filed not less than ten days before the beginning of the term at which the proceeding is to be heard, or good cause shall be shown for failure to file it within such time. A party may file only one such affidavit in any case. It shall be accompanied by a certificate of counsel of record stating that it is made in good faith.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 898; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §65, 63 Stat. 99.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §25 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §21, 36 Stat. 1090).

The provision that the same procedure shall be had when the presiding judge disqualifies himself was omitted as unnecessary. (See section 291 et seq. and section 455 of this title.)

Words, "at which the proceeding is to be heard," were added to clarify the meaning of words, "before the beginning of the term." (See U.S. v. Costea, D.C.Mich. 1943, 52 F.Supp. 3.)

Changes were made in phraseology and arrangement.

#### 1949 Act

This amendment clarifies the intent in section 144 of title 28, U.S.C., to conform to the law as it existed at the time of the enactment of the revision limiting the filing of affidavits of prejudice to one such affidavit in any case.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1949—Act May. 24, 1949, substituted "in any case" for "as to any judge" in second sentence of second par.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Terms

For abolition of formal terms of the court and replacement by sessions, see sections 138 and 139 of this title.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 122

**Question 122:** The conforming amendment to 10 CFR 50.73 (a) (2) states that reports submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73 (a) (2) (viii) also meet the effluent release reporting requirements of 10 CFR 20.2203 (a) (3). However, 10 CFR 20.2203 (a) (3) requires reporting of concentrations in an unrestricted area of 10 times any applicable limit in Part 20 while 10 CFR 50.73 (a) (2) (viii) requires reports of airborne or liquid effluent releases that exceed 20 times the applicable concentration limits in Table 2, Appendix B. Why is the multiple ten in one case and twenty in the other?

**Answer:** The two reporting requirements are consistent in terms of public dose. The annual dose limit for a member of the public is 100 mrem. 10 CFR 20.2203 (a) (3) requires reporting above a threshold of ten times this applicable limit, or 1000 mrem. The concentrations in Table 2, Appendix B, correspond to an annual dose of 50 mrem; therefore, the requirement in 10 CFR 50.73 (a) (2) (viii) for reporting at 20 times these concentrations corresponds to a reporting threshold in terms of annual dose, of 20 x 50 mrem, or 1000 mrem, which is the same dose threshold as that in 10 CFR 20.2203 (a) (3).

(References: 10 CFR 20.2203, 50.73)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017
```

[109th Congress Public Law 26]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ026.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 369]]

Public Law 109-26
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
40 Putnam Avenue in Hamden, Connecticut, as the ``Linda White-Epps Post 
            Office''. <<NOTE: July 12, 2005 -  [H.R. 627]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 40 
Putnam Avenue in Hamden, Connecticut, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Linda White-Epps Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Linda White-Epps Post 
Office''.

    Approved July 12, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 627:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            May 16, considered and passed House.
            June 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Õ  ̈ ø  ̈ a © ·o a – ” Ó Ú Î Ã ± 2 ­ ° a Æ ‹ øß
# Detail-level_Service_Contract_I

FY15 SERVICE CONTRACT INVENTORY - NRC		

&P of &N
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-22964-Civ-WILLIAMS/TORRES

DIANELIN VERGARA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of 

the Social Security Administration, 

Defendant.

__________________________________________/ 

ORDER ON MOTION TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintff Dianelin Vergara’s Motion 

for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [D.E. 33]. To appeal in forma 

pauperis, a party must file in the district court a motion and an affidavit that “(A)

shows . . . the party’s inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs; (B) claims 

an entitlement to redress; and (C) states the issues that the party intends to present 

on appeal.” Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). Here, Plaintff provided an affidavit showing her 

inability to pay fees and costs. [D.E. 33]. Moreover, our review of the record indicates 

that Plaintff claims an entitlement to redress and reveals the issues that she intends 

to present on appeal. Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the 

pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it 

is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED. 

Case 1:20-cv-22964-KMW Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/02/2022 Page 1 of 3
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 2nd day of 

August, 2022. 

/s/ Edwin G. Torres 

EDWIN G. TORRES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:20-cv-22964-KMW Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/02/2022 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:20-cv-22964-KMW Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/02/2022 Page 3 of 3
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis GONZALEZ-ROJAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40791.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Luis Gonzalez-Rojas (Gonzalez) appeals following his conviction and sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) for being illegally present in the United States after having been deported following conviction for an aggravated felony. Gonzalez asserts that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. The Government seeks to enforce a waiver-of-appeal provision contained in Gonzalez’s plea agreement.

*217Gonzalez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Gonzalez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Gonzalez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Given the above disposition, we do not decide whether Gonzalez’s appeal is barred by the waiver provision of his plea agreement.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Joel Gardner, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Megola Inc;

      2. Based on my  knowledge,  this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report; and

      3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  position,  results of operations,  and cash flows of the
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

      4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls
and procedures for the issuer and have:

            (i) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures to ensure that
material  information  relating to the issuer is made known to me,  particularly
during the period in which the periodic reports are being prepared;

            (ii) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures as of July 31, 2004 ["Evaluation Date"]; and

            (iii)   Presented   in  the   report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

      5. I have disclosed,  based on my most recent evaluation,  to the issuer's
auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of the  board  of  directors  (or  persons
fulfilling the equivalent function):

            (i) All  significant  deficiencies  in the  design or  operation  of
internal  controls which could adversely  affect the issuer's ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
issuer's  auditors any material  weaknesses in internal  controls  (none were so
noted); and

            (ii) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant  role in the issuer's  internal  controls
(none were so noted); and

      6. I have  indicated in the report  whether or not there were  significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.

Date: October 28, 2005


/s/ Joel Gardner
-----------------------
Joel Gardner
Chief Executive Officer
### §2405. Garnishment

In any action or suit commenced by the United States against a corporation for the recovery of money upon a bill, note, or other security, the debtors of the corporation may be summoned as garnishees. Any person so summoned shall appear in open court and depose in writing to the amount of his indebtedness to the corporation at the time of the service of the summons and at the time of making the deposition, and judgment may be entered in favor of the United States for the sum admitted by the garnishee to be due the corporation as if it had been due the United States. A judgment shall not be entered against any garnishee until after judgment has been rendered against the corporation, nor until the sum in which the garnishee is indebted is actually due.

When any garnishee deposes in open court that he is not and was not at the time of the service of the summons indebted to the corporation, an issue may be tendered by the United States upon such deposition. If, upon the trial of that issue, a verdict is rendered against the garnishee, judgment shall be entered in favor of the United States, pursuant to such verdict, with costs.

Any garnishee who fails to appear at the term to which he is summoned shall be subject to attachment for contempt.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 971.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§748, 749, and 750 (R.S. §§935, 936, 937).

Changes were made in phraseology.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 30, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00228

- CR

Jorge RODRIGUEZ , Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CRB000030D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr. , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On March 9, 2021, we abated this appeal and ordered the trial court to conduct an

abandonment hearing pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

On March 19, 2021, the trial court conducted an abandonment hearing via Zoom and found that

appellant still desires to prosecute this appeal and neither appellant nor counsel has abandoned

the appeal. On March 29, 2021, appellant’s counsel filed the brief.

Accordingly, we ORDER the abatement lifted and reinstate this appeal on this court’s

docket. We further ORDER the State to file its brief by April 28, 2021

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of March, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 23.1
|                            |                 |
|----------------------------|----------------------|
|                       |
|                       |
| Ernst & Young LLP | Tel: +1 403 206 5000 |
| 1000, 440 2nd Ave SW       | Fax: +1 403 290 4265 |
| Calgary, AB T2P 5E9        | ey.com/ca            |
|                       |                 |
|                       |                 |
|                       |                 |

 

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the use of our reports dated February 20, 2014 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TransAlta Corporation as at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2013, and internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 of TransAlta Corporation, included as an exhibit to or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 40-F) for 2013.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 

(1)      Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-72454 and No. 333-101470) pertaining to TransAlta Corporation’s Share Option Plan

 

(2)      Registration Statement (Form F-10 No. 333-185157) pertaining to the registration of Debt and Equity Securities of TransAlta Corporation

 

of our reports dated February 20, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TransAlta Corporation as at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2013, and internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 of TransAlta Corporation, included as an exhibit to or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 40-F) of TransAlta Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

 
|                     | signed   “Ernst & Young LLP” |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                            |
| Calgary,   Alberta       | Chartered Accountants                           |
| February 20,   2014 |                                            |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7749
JAMES MAXWELL GIBSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., The Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97- 1209-L) Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 14, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Maxwell Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Gibson v. Corcoran , No. CA-97-1209-L (D. Md. Nov. 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Thaddeus Kosciuszko
National Memorial
Pennsylvania


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Fees & Passes
 Free
No entrance pass requiredAn entrance pass is **not required** to access Thaddeus Kosciuszko National Memorial.
Other National Park Service sites may require an entrance pass or fee. Depending on your trip plans, an interagency pass may save you money.
2024 Free Entrance Days in the National Parks
Come experience the national parks! All National Park Service sites that charge an entrance fee will offer free admission to everyone (other fees may apply). Mark your calendar for these entrance fee-free dates:Monday, January 15 — Martin Luther King, Jr. DaySaturday, April 20 — First Day of National Park WeekWednesday, June 19 — JuneteenthSunday, August 4 — The Great American Outdoors ActSaturday, September 28 — National Public Lands DayMonday, November 11 — Veterans Day

Color photo showing a replica of an 18th-century chess set and glasses on a wooden dresser at the foot of a wooden bed.Thaddeus Kosciuszko found many ways to pass the time while recovering from his wounds, like playing chess, drawing in his sketch book, and visiting with friends. NPS photo

The site is open Saturdays and Sundays, 12 noon to 4 pm. Admission is free.
Looking for National Park Service passes?  The Thaddeus Kosciuszko National Memorial does **not** issue America the Beautiful passes.  Read more about America the Beautiful pass options and issuing agencies.
 Last updated: April 3, 2024
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: c/o Independence National Historical Park
143 S. 3rd Street
Philadelphia,
PA
19106
 Phone: 215 965-2305
Due to the site's limited hours, visitors are advised to phone the Independence Visitor Center at the above number.  Rangers at the visitor center (open 7 days a week) can answer questions and provide information about the Thaddeus Kosciuszko National Memorial Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
#### §§ 206.142-206.150 [Reserved]
Exhibit 13

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of HDFC Bank Limited, (the Company) for the period ending
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of such officers knowledge, that:

1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of March 31, 2009 and for the periods presented in the Report.

The foregoing certification is provided solely for the purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.



|                          |  |  |  |  |  |                       
|------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------
|Dated: September 30, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    Aditya Puri    
|                          |  |  |  |  |  | Aditya Puri           
|                          |  |  |  |  |  | Managing Director     
|                          |  |  | 
|Dated: September 30, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    Sashi Jagdishan
|                          |  |  |  |  |  | Sashi Jagdishan       
|                          |  |  |  |  |  | Head  Finance
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Travel America's Diverse Cultures
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAdvanced High Temperature Structural SealsThis program addresses the development of high temperature structural seals for control surfaces for a new generation of small reusable launch vehicles. Successful development will contribute significantly to the mission goal of reducing launch cost for small, 200 to 300 pound payloads. Development of high temperature seals is mission enabling. For instance, ineffective control surface seals can result in high temperature (3100 F) flows in the elevon area exceeding structural material limits. Longer sealing life will allow use for many missions before replacement, contributing to the reduction of hardware, operation and launch costs.Document ID20020090799Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsNewquist, Charles W.*(Boeing Phantom Works Seattle, WA United States)*Verzemnieks, Juris*(Boeing Phantom Works Seattle, WA United States)*Keller, Peter C.*(Boeing Phantom Works Seattle, WA United States)*Rorabaugh, Michael*(Boeing Phantom Works Seattle, WA United States)*Shorey, Mark*(Boeing Phantom Works Seattle, WA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2002Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberE-13617NASA/CR-2002-211973NAS 1.26:211973Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 706-85-33CONTRACT_GRANT: F33615-95-D-3203PROJECT: AF Proj. 0014Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020090799.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024