alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 128.500 What are the requirements for filing a VOSB or SDVOSB status protest? ( a ) All challenges to the inclusion in the certification database of a VOSB or SDVOSB based on the status of the concern as a small business concern or the ownership or control of the concern, shall be heard by the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Small Business Administration in accordance with part 134 of this chapter. The decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals shall be considered final agency action.
( b ) The protest procedures described in part 134 of this chapter are separate from those governing size protests and appeals. All protests relating to whether an eligible VOSB or SDVOSB is a small business for purposes of any Federal program are subject to part 121 of this chapter and must be filed in accordance with that part. If a protester protests both the size of the VOSB or SDVOSB and whether the concern meets the VOSB or SDVOSB requirements set forth in § 128.200, SBA will process each protest concurrently under the procedures set forth in parts 121 and 134 of this chapter. SBA does not review issues concerning the administration of a VOSB or SDVOSB contract.
( c ) When challenging the SDVOSB status of a joint venture, the managing SDVOSB party to the joint venture must be a certified SDVOSB as of the date of the joint venture's initial offer, including price, for the SDVOSB contract and compliance with the joint venture agreement requirements set forth in § 128.402(c) is determined as of the date of the final proposal revision for negotiated acquisitions and final bid for sealed bidding.
( d ) A concern found not to qualify as a VOSB or SDVOSB in a status protest may not submit an offer on a future VOSB or SDVOSB procurement until the protested concern reapplies to the Veteran Small Business Certification Program and has been designated by SBA as a VOSB or SDVOSB into the certification database. If a concern found to be ineligible submits an offer, it may be in violation of criminal laws, including section 16(d) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 645(d). If the concern has already certified itself as a VOSB or SDVOSB on a pending procurement, the concern must immediately inform the contracting officer for the procuring agency of the adverse determination. ( 1 ) Not later than two days after SBA's final determination finding a concern ineligible as a VOSB or SDVOSB, such concern must update its VOSB or SDVOSB status in the System for Award Management (or any successor system).
( 2 ) If a business concern fails to update its VOSB or SDVOSB status in the System for Award Management (or any successor system) in response to decertification, SBA will make such update within two days of the business's failure to do so.
[87 FR 73412, Nov. 29, 2022, as amended at 88 FR 26216, Apr. 27, 2023]
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of New Energy Systems Group, (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jufeng Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July 14, 2011


/s/ Jufeng ChenJufeng Chen

Chief Financial Officer
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FT. LAUDERDALE DIVSION

------------------------------------------------------------------------x 

Amir Preisler, Civil Action No:

0:20-cv-61365

Plaintiff,

-v.-

Regions Bank

Defendant(s). 

------------------------------------------------------------------------x 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Notice is hereby given that the parties have settled this matter. The parties anticipate 

completing settlement documents and filing a dismissal with the Court within the next sixty (60) 

days. The parties request that the Court retain jurisdiction of this case during said sixty (60) day 

period.

DATED, this 15th day of January, 2021

/s/Justin E. Zeig

Justin E. Zeig, Esq.

 Zeig Law Firm, LLC

3475 Sheridan Street Suite 310

Hollywood, FL 33021

Phone: 754-217-3084

justin@zeiglawfirm.com

Case 0:20-cv-61365-AHS Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/15/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was electronically filed 

on January 15, 2021 with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing 

document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the Service 

List below either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some 

other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive 

electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

/s/ Justin E. Zeig

Justin E. Zeig, Esq.

Case 0:20-cv-61365-AHS Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/15/2021 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Charles Fraser and Another, as Executors, etc., of John C. Latham, Deceased. Charles Fraser, Individually, as Executor, etc., Appellant; Elsie G. Latham, Respondent.

Decree affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
No: 23-080 December 19, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Announces Opportunity to Request a Hearing for

Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal Application

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced in the Federal Register an opportunity 

to request a hearing on an application to renew the operating licenses for Diablo Canyon Nuclear 

Power Plant in Avila Beach, California. The notice includes instructions for filing hearing 

requests.

Pacific Gas & Electric filed the application on Nov. 7, seeking to extend the plant’s 

operating licenses by an additional 20 years. Diablo Canyon, located about 12 miles southwest of 

San Luis Obispo, is currently licensed to operate through Nov. 2, 2024, for Unit 1 and through 

Aug. 26, 2025, for Unit 2. 

The NRC staff has determined the application contains sufficient information to formally 

docket the application and begin its detailed safety and environmental reviews. With the 

docketing of the application, the reactors’ licenses will remain in effect under an exemption to 

agency regulations until the agency’s review is complete.

The deadline for filing hearing requests is March 4, 2024. 

Information about the license renewal process is available on the NRC website. A copy 

of the Diablo Canyon license renewal application is online and publicly available at the San Luis 

Obispo Library at 995 Palm Street in San Luis Obispo.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S JUNE 30, 1999 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          30,292
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                       947
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,876
<PP&E>                                         134,238
<DEPRECIATION>                                  67,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           755
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,658
<SALES>                                         70,078
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,078
<CGS>                                           61,852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,830
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,550)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   148
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  65
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,202)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,458
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,660)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,660)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.27)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



                                  CERTIFICATION

     By signing below, each of the undersigned  hereby certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that, to his knowledge,  (i) this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly  period ended  September 30, 2004  ("Report")  fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii)
the  information  contained  in this Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FFW Corporation.

     Signed this 12th day of November, 2004.


                                      FFW CORPORATION
                                      Registrant


Date: November 12, 2004               By: /s/ Roger K. Cromer
     ----------------------------         --------------------------------------
                                          Roger K. Cromer
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 12, 2004               By: /s/ Timothy A. Sheppard
     ----------------------------         --------------------------------------
                                          Timothy A. Sheppard
                                          Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer




A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to FFW  Corporation  and  will  be  retained  by FFW  Corporation  and
forwarded to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### William Schunk, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. William Eisenberg, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
### subpart 3—adult and dislocated worker employment and training activities
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Hallett, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions affirmed. Ro opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 5289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2266]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CT-057-7216f; FRL-7618-1]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Connecticut; Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing the direct final 
rule to approve Connecticut's 2005 and 2007 motor vehicle emissions 
budgets recalculated using MOBILE6.2 for the Connecticut portion of the 
New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island nonattainment area and to 
approve Connecticut's 2007 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the 
Greater Connecticut nonattainment area also recalculated using 
MOBILE6.2. In the direct final rule published on December 18, 2003 (68 
FR 70437), we stated that if we received adverse comment by January 20, 
2004, the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. EPA subsequently 
received an adverse comment. EPA will address the comment received in a 
subsequent final action based upon the proposed action also published 
on December 18, 2003 (68 FR 70484). EPA will not institute a second 
comment period on this action.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The Direct final rule is withdrawn as of February 4, 
2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald O. Cooke, Environmental 
Scientist, Air Quality Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 
New England Regional Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CAQ), 
Boston, MA 02114-2023, (617) 918-1668, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#02616d6d69672c666d6c636e66426772632c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="42212d2d29276c262d2c232e26022732236c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
Intergovernmental relations, Oxides of Nitrogen, Ozone, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: January 26, 2004.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.

0
Accordingly, the revisions of 40 CFR 52.377(b), (c) and (d) (which 
published in the Federal Register on December 18, 2003 at 68 FR 70437) 
are withdrawn as of February 4, 2004.

[FR Doc. 04-2266 Filed 2-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 20-22872-Civ-COOKE/GOODMAN 

CHRISTOPHER HANSEN, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

LAS VINAS INVESTMENTS, LLC., and 

LAS VINAS BBQ, INC. 

Defendants. 

_____________________________________/ 

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING 

CASE UPON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

THIS MATTER comes before me on the Plaintiff’s Notice of Settlement (ECF No. 

6). The parties have amicably resolved this matter. Accordingly, this case will now be 

administratively closed pending the Plaintiff filing a notice of dismissal, or the parties filing 

a stipulation of dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A). If the parties 

file a stipulation of final dismissal and desire the Court to have continuing jurisdiction to 

enforce the terms of the settlement agreement, they must condition the stipulation upon this 

Court entering an order retaining jurisdiction. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 

F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012). A notice of dismissal, or a stipulation of dismissal must be filed 

within 30 days of this Order. The Clerk will administratively CLOSE this case. All pending 

motions, if any, are DENIED as moot. 

DONE and ORDERED in chambers, Miami, Florida, this 5th day of August 2020. 

Copies provided to: 

Jonathan Goodman, U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Counsel of Record 

Case 1:20-cv-22872-MGC Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2020 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
      23.1








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








As
      independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the
      incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-107721 on
      Form
      S-8 of our report dated December 18, 2007, relating to the consolidated
      financial statements of LiveDeal, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30,
      2007
      and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and
      cash flows for the year ended September 30, 2007, included in the 2007 Annual
      Report on Form 10-K of LiveDeal, Inc. and Subsidiaries.








/s/
      Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.





Phoenix,
      Arizona


December
      18, 2007
§ 142.28 Where is the hearing held? The ALJ will hold the hearing in any judicial district of the United States: ( a ) In which the defendant resides or transacts business; or
( b ) In which the claim or statement on which liability is based was made, presented or submitted to SBA; or
( c ) As agreed upon by the defendant and the ALJ.
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guy Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  April 29, 2010
/s/ Guy BernsteinGuy BernsteinChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
### §4421. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

#### (1) Wager

The term "wager" means—

(A) any wager with respect to a sports event or a contest placed with a person engaged in the business of accepting such wagers,

(B) any wager placed in a wagering pool with respect to a sports event or a contest, if such pool is conducted for profit, and

(C) any wager placed in a lottery conducted for profit.

#### (2) Lottery

The term "lottery" includes the numbers game, policy, and similar types of wagering. The term does not include—

(A) any game of a type in which usually

(i) the wagers are placed,

(ii) the winners are determined, and

(iii) the distribution of prizes or other property is made, in the presence of all persons placing wagers in such game, and

(B) any drawing conducted by an organization exempt from tax under sections 501 and 521, if no part of the net proceeds derived from such drawing inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 528.)
#### George E. Loeffler and Henry Scheibel, as Executors, etc., of George Loeffler, Deceased, Appellants, v. Henry Loeffler, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Burr, Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
### §175. National Labor-Management Panel; creation and composition; appointment, tenure, and compensation; duties

(a) There is created a National Labor-Management Panel which shall be composed of twelve members appointed by the President, six of whom shall be selected from among persons outstanding in the field of management and six of whom shall be selected from among persons outstanding in the field of labor. Each member shall hold office for a term of three years, except that any member appointed to fill a vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of the term for which his predecessor was appointed shall be appointed for the remainder of such term, and the terms of office of the members first taking office shall expire, as designated by the President at the time of appointment, four at the end of the first year, four at the end of the second year, and four at the end of the third year after the date of appointment. Members of the panel, when serving on business of the panel, shall be paid compensation at the rate of $25 per day, and shall also be entitled to receive an allowance for actual and necessary travel and subsistence expenses while so serving away from their places of residence.

(b) It shall be the duty of the panel, at the request of the Director, to advise in the avoidance of industrial controversies and the manner in which mediation and voluntary adjustment shall be administered, particularly with reference to controversies affecting the general welfare of the country.

(June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title II, §205, 61 Stat. 154.)
Exhibit 31.1
 Certifications under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hampton Roads
Bankshares, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2010 (this Report); and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Report.
 Date:  April 26, 2011
    /s/ John A. B. Davies, Jr.John A. B. Davies, Jr.Chief Executive Officer 47
EXHIBIT 32.2: CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

            In connection with the accompanying Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Magna-Lab, Inc. for the quarter and six months ended August 31, 2004, the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

            (3)   such Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter and six
                  months ended August 31, 2004 fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (4)   the information contained in such Quarterly report on Form
                  10-QSB for the quarter and six months ended August 31, 2004
                  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                  condition and results of operations of Magna-Lab, Inc.


      October 14, 2004                          /s/ Kenneth C. Riscica
                                                ----------------------
                                                Name: Kenneth C. Riscica
                                                Title: Chief Financial Officer
No: III-23-006 March 21, 2023 

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662 

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663 

NRC Names New Resident Inspector at Byron Nuclear Generating Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Ashley Demeter 

as the new resident inspector at the Byron nuclear generating station, which 

is located in Byron Illinois and operated by Constellation Energy. 

Demeter joined the NRC in 2021 as a project engineer. She has held 

rotational assignments as a resident inspector at the Illinois-based Dresden, 

Braidwood, and Byron nuclear power plants. Prior to joining the NRC, she 

served as a shift test engineer at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard. 

“We are pleased to welcome Ashley to Region III, especially as the 

new resident inspector at Byron. Her work at the Shipyard provided her 

with great experience and knowledge of nuclear maintenance and testing. In addition, her 

background as a nuclear quality auditor will be valuable in her resident inspector role. Ashley’s 

great energy, competence, and readiness to actively support all areas of nuclear safety oversight will 

be great assets in her new position,” said NRC Region III Administrator Jack Giessner. 

Demeter holds a master’s degree in nuclear engineering from North Carolina State 

University and a bachelor’s degree in physics from Baldwin Wallace University. She also 

performed significant work in areas of nuclear modeling and simulation research at the Oak Ridge 

National Laboratory during graduate school. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. 

They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring 

significant work projects, and interacting with plant workers and the public.