alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is a serious poultry disease that spreads very quickly. 

One of the most important things you can do to protect your birds is to follow good biosecurity. 

If you see signs of illness in your birds, report it immediately. Together, these actions will help 

keep HPAI from infecting U.S. poultry flocks.

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. 

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Program Aid No. 2162

Issued April 2015 • Slightly revised April 2016

If you have sick or dying birds, 

please report them to USDA 

or your State veterinarian right away!

USDA Toll-Free Number: 1-866-536-7593

State Veterinarian’s Office:

Report Sick Birds! Watch for These Signs of Illness:

•	 Sudden increase in bird deaths in your flock

•	 Sneezing, gasping for air, coughing, and nasal discharge

•	 Watery and green diarrhea

•	 Lack of energy and poor appetite

•	 Drop in egg production or soft- or thin-shelled, misshapen eggs

•	 Swelling around the eyes, neck, and head

•	 Purple discoloration of the wattles, comb, and legs 

•	 Ruffled feathers, listlessness, lethargy

Biosecurity Basics

•	 Allow only essential personnel to access 

your property and your birds. Disinfect any 

vehicles that enter your farm.

•	 Don’t lend or borrow equipment from other 

farms. Bring only cleaned and disinfected 

items into your bird area.

•	 Avoid contact with other poultry. If you 

cannot avoid contact, change clothes and 

shoes before working with your own birds.

•	 Wash your hands thoroughly with soap and 

water before entering your bird area.

•	 Use footbaths when entering or leaving 

your bird housing (change disinfectant 

frequently)—or wear disposable boot covers.

•	 Keep poultry separate from wild birds. Don’t 

let them share water sources or have access 

to common areas frequented by wild birds. 

•	 Eliminate standing water on your farm and 

clean up feed spills to avoid attracting 

wild birds. 

For more information about good biosecurity 

practices, contact your industry association or 

visit the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) 

Web site: healthybirds.aphis.usda.gov.

ATTENTION POULTRY OWNERS

Biosecurity

Is Important!
#### David P. Leahy Realty Company, Appellant, v. Augustus A. West and Cora M. West, Defendants. Arthur Phelps Marr, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
#### Dorothy A. Mullane, Amended to Dorothy A. Steiner, Respondent, v. Duane C. Wilson et al., Appellants.

Memorandum: We conclude that the verdict against the defendant William C. Maunz Co., Inc., is against the weight of the evidence. Moreover, it was error to permit the jury, over said defendant’s objection and exception, to predicate liability upon its violations of subdivisions 16 and 19 of section 15 of the Ordinances of the City of Buffalo, which restricted the time of parking on the public streets; subdivision 16 to twenty-four hours in the case of any motor vehicle and subdivision 19 to a period of one hour in the ease of motor vehicles over eighteen feet long. (See *Boronkay*v. *Robinson & Carpenter,*247 N. Y. 365, 368; *Killen*v. *New York Central R. R. Co.,*225 App. Div. 8.) However, the verdict in plaintiff’s favor against the defendant Wilson finds ample support in the evidence; hence the judgment against Wilson should be affirmed. (See *Ward*v. *Iroquois Gas Corp.,*233 App. Div. 127, 134, affd. 258 N. Y. 124, *745129.) All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-149 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, July 16, 1999)

COMMISSION DIRECTS NRC STAFF TO PREPARE A NEW RULE

UPGRADING SECURITY REQUIREMENTS AT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

The staff of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun preparing a new rule that

would require nuclear power plant licensees to periodically conduct drills and exercises to test

the adequacy of their programs for safeguarding nuclear plants from terrorist attacks.

Under the new rule, drills and exercises will occur more frequently than under the

Operational Safeguards Response Evaluations (OSRE) program. In addition, the new program

will have more standards for evaluation than OSRE.

Where weaknesses are identified, the new rule will require licensees to strengthen their

security programs. NRC will likely continue to use private contractors to assist in its evaluation

of the performance of its licensees during drills and exercises in which a mock terrorist force

attempts to compromise the security of nuclear power plants by gaining access to vital

equipment. The NRC staff also will develop detailed guidance on how to implement the new

rule, and provide inspection procedures and training for NRC staff.

The new program will replace OSRE, but will retain many of the most important

elements of the program in place since 1991, including a requirement for field exercises using

mock terrorists.

Eight nuclear plants that have not been evaluated under OSRE will be assessed under a

modified form of the program. The new security program will be incorporated into the NRC’s

new baseline inspection program when it is fully implemented early next year, following a pilot

program evaluation now underway at nine nuclear plants throughout the country.

##
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

61 Forsyth Street SW

Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-11 February 8, 2000

CONTACT: Kenneth M. Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $110,000 FINE AGAINST TVA FOR

DISCRIMINATION AGAINST A FORMER CORPORATE EMPLOYEE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $110,000 civil penalty against the

Tennessee Valley Authority for discrimination against Gary L. Fiser, a former TVA corporate

employee, for engaging in protected activities. The violation is characterized as the agency’s second

highest level violation. In addition, the NRC staff sent notices of violation to two TVA corporate

managers who were directly involved in the employment decisions affecting Fiser.

The NRC determined that, in July 1996, TVA, as part of a corporate reorganization, eliminated

Fiser’s position and took subsequent actions to ensure that he was not selected for one of two new

positions. The NRC investigation concluded that TVA took these actions, at least in part, in retaliation

for Fiser’s involvement in protected activities. Fiser’s protected activities included identifying

chemistry-related nuclear safety concerns in 1991-1993 and filing a U.S. Department of Labor

complaint in 1993 based, in part, on those concerns.

NRC regulations prohibit a licensee from discriminating against any employee for engaging in

certain protected activities such as providing a licensee with nuclear safety concerns or testifying at any

Federal proceeding related to NRC requirements.

TVA has denied that discrimination against Fiser occurred.

TVA has 30 days from receipt of the Notice of Violation to either pay the fine or protest its

imposition.

#####
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateEnforcementSanctions for Discrimination Against Employees Who Raise Safety Concerns

# Draft Discrimination Task Group Report and Associated Comments

**Comments**
        - In 2000 and 2001 the NRC sought public comments on the  Draft Discrimination Task Group Report . The report was available for comment until August 17, 2001.

For further information, feel free to contact us.

The links below are to documents in portable document format (PDF). The PDF icon after a link indicates that an Adobe Acrobat reader is needed to view the document. The vendor allows Web users to download the reader free of charge. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.

Public comments on the Draft Report:
        - Michael Stein
        - James E. Foster
        - Robert Meyer
        - Michael Stein
        - Union of Concerned Scientists
        - James E. Foster
        - Gary Pierce
        - Robert Norway
        - National Whistleblower Center
        - NEI
        - TVA
        - Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius
        - Winston & Strawn
        - Ted Metzler
        - Florida Power & Light Company
        - Ameren Corporation (Union Electric)
        - Exelon Nuclear
        - Mike Stein
        - STP Nuclear Operating Company
        - Jeff Kriner

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 7, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Federal Register Notice
          - Charter
          - Draft Report and Comments
          - General Comments
          - Public Stakeholder Meetings

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 7, 2020
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

38.5 39.0 39.5 40.0



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/04 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 71

**Question 71:** The "Class" column of 10 CFR 20 Appendix B covers inhalation, but does not refer to ingestion. When there are two ALIs for ingestion, how do these relate to the "Class," since they really were based upon the f1 value for gut absorption? (Note: The f1 value is the fractional uptake from the small intestine to blood).

**Answer:** The ALIs for ingestion do not relate to the "Class," which refers to the retention time in the pulmonary region of the lung. There are two situations for which there are two ALIs for ingestion. One is when the ALI is determined by the non-stochastic dose to an organ. In this case, the organ or tissue to which the limit applies is shown, and the ALI for the stochastic limit is shown in parentheses (for example, see ingestion ALI for beryllium-10). The other case (and the case presumably in question) is when different f1 values were used to calculate the ingestion ALIs. For example, see the entry for cobalt-60, for which the ingestion ALIs are 500 (on the first line) and 200 (on the second line). These ingestion ALI values have no relationship to the corresponding "Class" on the same line (W on the first line and Y on the second line). Rather, as explained in Federal Guidance Report No. 11, these different ingestion ALIs are based on two different f1 values: f1 = 0.05 for ALI = 500, and f1 = 0.3 for ALI = 200. As shown in Federal Guidance Report No. 11, Table 3, f1 = 0.05 for "oxides, hydroxides and trace inorganic," and f1 = 0.3 for "organic complexed and other inorganics." For inhalation of cobalt-60, f1 = 0.05 for both "oxides, hydroxides, halides and nitrates" (class Y), and "all others" (class W).

The following information on Federal Guidance Report No. 11 is provided for those not familiar with this document: The title of this report is "Limiting Values of Radionuclide Intake and Air Concentration and Dose Conversion Factors of Inhalation, Submersion and Ingestion." The report is subtitled "Derived Guides for Control of Occupational Exposure and Exposure-to-Dose Conversion Factors for General Application, Based on 1987 Federal Radiation Protection Guidance." The report was published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as report number EPA-520 / 1-88-020 on September 1, 1988. The ALI and DAC values in this report are used in Appendix B of the revised Part 20.

(References: 10 CFR 20 Appendix B, Federal Guidance Report No. 11).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, December 13, 2017
USGS Publications Warehouse - Citation View 

USGS Publications Warehouse 1 of 3 
Publication Citation

Online Document Versions

View index pageView document

USGS Store

Currently unavailable through the USGSStore.

Publication Type USGS Numbered SeriesTitle Alaska Resource Data File; Blying Sound QuadrangleAuthor Huber, JeffYear 1999Series Open-File ReportSeries Number 99-392Edition -Language ENGLISHPublisher U.S. Geological Survey,ISSN 0094-9140Description 34 p. :maps ;28 cm.USGS Library CallNumber (200) R29o no.99-392

USGS Publications Warehouse 

2 of 3 
Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/Page Contact Information: Contact the Pubs Warehouse TeamPage Last modified: 12/07/2011 15:54:10

USGS Publications Warehouse 3 of 3
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Dale E. Parker, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of Appleton Papers Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Appleton Papers Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

March 17, 2006



|           |  |                                                    
|---------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Signature: |  | /s/ Dale E. Parker                                 
|           |  | Dale E. Parker                                     
|           |  | Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Characteristic Jurassic mollusks from northern Alaska

#### Professional Paper 274-D

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plate: **Plate 1**                                
  (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp274D 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:09:54
§ 128.200 What are the requirements a concern must meet to qualify as a VOSB or SDVOSB? ( a ) *Qualification as a VOSB.* To qualify as a VOSB, a business entity must be: ( 1 ) A small business concern as defined in part 121 of this chapter under the size standard corresponding to any NAICS code listed in its SAM profile;
( 2 ) Not less than 51 percent owned and controlled by one or more veterans.
( b ) *Qualification as an SDVOSB.* To qualify as an SDVOSB, a business entity must be: ( 1 ) A small business concern as defined in part 121 of this chapter under the size standard corresponding to any NAICS code listed in its SAM profile;
( 2 ) Not less than 51 percent owned and controlled by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of a veteran with a disability that is rated by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs as a permanent and total disability who are unable to manage the daily business operations of such concern, the spouse or permanent caregiver of such veteran.
( c ) *VOSB and SDVOSB certification requirement.* ( 1 ) A concern must be certified as a VOSB or SDVOSB pursuant to § 128.300 in order to be awarded a VOSB or SDVOSB set-aside or sole source contract. Any small business concern that submits a complete certification application to SBA on or before December 31, 2023, shall be eligible to self-certify for SDVOSB sole source or set-aside contracts (other than VA contracts) until SBA declines or approves the concern's application. Any small business concern that does not submit a complete SDVOSB certification application to SBA on or before December 31, 2023, will no longer be eligible to self-certify for SDVOSB sole source or set-aside contracts effective January 1, 2024.
( 2 ) A concern must be certified pursuant to § 128.300 to receive a prime contract that is to be counted by a Federal agency for the purposes of meeting participation goals for SDVOSBs or to receive a subcontract from a Federal prime contractor for the purpose of meeting subcontracting goals for SBVOSBs in Federal procurement contracts. Any small business concern that submits a complete certification application to SBA on or before December 22, 2024, shall be eligible to self-certify for a Federal prime or subcontract that counts towards SDVOSB goaling purposes or SDVOSB subcontracting goals, respectively, until SBA declines or approves the concern's application. Any small business concern that does not submit a complete SDVOSB certification application to SBA on or before December 22, 2024, will no longer be eligible to self-certify for a Federal prime or subcontract that counts towards SDVOSB goaling purposes or SDVOSB subcontracting goals, respectively.
[87 FR 73412, Nov. 29, 2022, as amended at 89 FR 48269, June 6, 2024]
#### § 500.1 Purpose.

This part is issued by the Emergency Oil and Gas Guaranteed Loan Board pursuant to section 552 of title 5 of the United States Code and the Emergency Oil and Gas Guaranteed Loan Act, Chapter 2 of Public Law 106-51. This part contains rules for making and servicing loans to qualified oil and gas guaranteed by the Board.