alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1:20-cv-22787-EGT

NEYBER RUIZ,

and other similarly situated individuals,

Plaintiff,

vs.

M & R SECURITY SERVICE, INC., MARIO

DE MOYA and ANA RODRIGUEZ

Defendants.

___________________________________/

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, NEYBER RUIZ, and Defendants, M & R SECURITY SERVICE INC., MARIO 

DE MOYA and ANA RODRIGUEZ, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby show 

the Court that all matters and things herein have been amicably resolved, and therefore, the parties 

hereto agree to the dismissal of the above styled action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41, with prejudice and without costs to either party, with each party to bear their own attorneys' 

fees and request for the Court to retain jurisdiction of this cause for the purpose of enforcing the 

parties' settlement.

/s/Tanesha Blye

Tanesha Blye, Esq. 

Fla. Bar No.: 738158

Email:tblye@saenzanderson.com

Aron Smukler, Esq. 

FBN: 0297779 

Email: asmukler@saenzanderson.com 

SAENZ & ANDERSON, PLLC 

20900 NE 30th Avenue, Ste. 800 

Aventura, Florida 33180 

Telephone: (305) 503-5131 

s/Nathaly Saavedra

Nathaly Saavedra, Esq. 

Fla. Bar No. 118315

PEREGONZA THE ATTORNEYS, PLLC

1414 NW 107th Ave, 

Suite 302

Doral, FL 33172

Tel. (786) 650-0202

Fax. (786) 650-0200

Email: nathaly@peregonza.com

Telephone: (305) 507-8506

Case 1:20-cv-22787-EGT Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2021 Page 1 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on April 7, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being 

served this day on all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List in the manner 

specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some 

other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive 

electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

/s/Nathaly Saavedra, Esq

NATHALY SAAVEDRA, ESQ.

Case 1:20-cv-22787-EGT Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2021 Page 2 of 3
SERVICE LIST

Tanesha Blye, Esq. 

Fla. Bar No.: 738158

Email:tblye@saenzanderson.com

Aron Smukler, Esq. 

FBN: 0297779 

Email: asmukler@saenzanderson.com 

T. Martin Saenz, Esq. 

Fla. Bar No. 0640166

Email: msaenz@saenzanderson.com

SAENZ & ANDERSON, PLLC 

20900 NE 30th Avenue, Ste. 800 

Aventura, Florida 33180 

Telephone: (305) 503-5131 

Facsimile: (888) 270-5549 

Counsel for Plaintiff NEYBER RUIZ 

Nathaly Saavedra, Esq. 

Fla. Bar No. 118315

PEREGONZA THE ATTORNEYS, PLLC

1414 NW 107th Ave, Suite 302

Doral, FL 33172

Tel. (786) 650-0202

Fax. (786) 650-0200

Email: office@peregonza.com

Email: nathaly@peregonza.com

Counsel for Defendants 

Method of Service: CM/ECF Notice

Case 1:20-cv-22787-EGT Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2021 Page 3 of 3
### §120. Rhode Island

Rhode Island constitutes one judicial district.

Court shall be held at Providence.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 889.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §185 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §104, 36 Stat. 1123; Feb. 1, 1912, ch. 27, 37 Stat. 59).

Changes in phraseology were made.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2004 / Presidential Documents 61137

Proclamation 7830 of October 11, 2004

General Pulaski Memorial Day, 2004

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation

The story of Revolutionary War hero Brigadier General Casimir Pulaski 

is one of bravery and sacrifice that helped to secure America’s blessings 

of liberty. We remember General Pulaski for his skill in battle, his commitment to freedom, and his willingness to give his life for America’s independence. 

Born in Poland in 1745, Casimir Pulaski first gained distinction as a military 

hero while fighting to defend his native Poland. His reputation as a bold 

warrior and his dedication to the cause of liberty became known throughout 

Europe. 

Pulaski met with Benjamin Franklin in Paris in 1777 and agreed to join 

the Americans in their fight for freedom. He quickly proved to be a gifted 

military leader and was commissioned as a Brigadier General. He became 

known as ‘‘the Father of the American Cavalry,’’ recruiting and training 

a special corps of American, Polish, Irish, French, and German troops who 

fought with great skill and success. During the siege of Savannah in 1779, 

General Pulaski was mortally wounded, leaving a legacy of heroism that 

continues to inspire people around the world. 

On General Pulaski Memorial Day, we honor a noble patriot committed 

to the cause of freedom, and we recognize the countless contributions Polish 

Americans have made to our Nation and our culture. We also celebrate 

the strong friendship between the United States and Poland, remembering 

our shared history and common values and honoring the sacrifices of Polish 

troops who have served bravely alongside American and coalition forces 

in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 11, 2004, as 

General Pulaski Memorial Day. I encourage all Americans to commemorate 

this occasion with appropriate programs and activities paying tribute to 

Casimir Pulaski and honoring all those who defend freedom. 

61138 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2004 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eleventh day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand four, and of the IndependBilling code 3195

Filed 10

[FR Doc. 04

–13–

–

04; 8:54 am] 

23207

–01–P 

ence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-ninth.

W
#### § 302.6 Additional requirements; Federal policies and procedures.

Recipients are subject to all Federal laws and to Federal, Department, and EDA policies, regulations, and procedures applicable to Federal financial assistance awards, including 2 CFR part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.

[82 FR 57053, Dec. 1, 2017]
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.332 What are the eligible uses of proceeds? ( a ) *Acquire property.* The Borrower may use the loan proceeds to acquire land necessary for imminent plant construction, buildings, machinery, equipment, furniture, fixtures, facilities, supplies, and material needed to accomplish any of the eligible program purposes in § 120.330.
( b ) *Research and development.* Up to 30% of loan proceeds may be used for research and development: ( 1 ) Of an existing product or service; or
( 2 ) A new product or service.
( c ) *Working capital.* The Borrower may use proceeds for working capital for entering or expanding in the energy conservation market.
Exhibit C

Case 9:20-cv-81175-AHS Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 1 of 3
Exhibit C

Case 9:20-cv-81175-AHS Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 2 of 3
Exhibit C

Case 9:20-cv-81175-AHS Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 3 of 3
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 400

**Question 400:** NRC Form 5 (Item No. 10B) includes the symbol "V", which is not defined in Regulatory Guide 8.7, Revision 1.

(a) Does the "V" signify "vapor" as used in Federal Guidance Report No. 11?

(b) If so, how is this lung clearance class to be applied in operational air sampling and internal dosimetry programs?

**Answer:**

(a) "V" in Item 10B of Form 5 is an abbreviation for the lung clearance class "vapor" in Appendix B to 10 CFR 20.1001 - 20.2401. "Vapor" is listed as a lung clearance "class" for only two elements, sulfur and nickel. (However, the "water" inhalation class for hydrogen-3 indicates water vapor.)

(b) The "vapor" inhalation class should be used when the radionuclides are present in the form of a vapor in the air and the associated air sampling should be appropriate for sampling the radionuclides in this form.

(References: 10 CFR 20.2106, 10 CFR 20.2206, Regulatory Guide 8.7)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, December 01, 2017
### §257. Publication of decisions

All decisions of the Court of International Trade shall be preserved and open to inspection. The court shall forward copies of each decision to the Secretary of the Treasury or his designee and to the appropriate customs officer for the district in which the case arose. The Secretary shall publish weekly such decisions as he or the court may designate and abstracts of all other decisions.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 900, §255; renumbered §257 and amended Pub. L. 91–271, title I, §107, June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 277; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §501(6), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1742.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 1519 of title 19, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Customs Duties (June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §519, 46 Stat. 739).

Changes in phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–417 redesignated the Customs Court as the Court of International Trade.

1970—Pub. L. 91–271 inserted "or his designee" after "Secretary of the Treasury," and substituted "to the appropriate customs officer" for "the collector".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980, and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–271 effective Oct. 1, 1970, see section 122 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as an Effective Date note under section 256 of this title.
### §2264. Scope of Federal review; district court adjudications

(a) Whenever a State prisoner under capital sentence files a petition for habeas corpus relief to which this chapter applies, the district court shall only consider a claim or claims that have been raised and decided on the merits in the State courts, unless the failure to raise the claim properly is—

(1) the result of State action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States;

(2) the result of the Supreme Court's recognition of a new Federal right that is made retroactively applicable; or

(3) based on a factual predicate that could not have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence in time to present the claim for State or Federal post-conviction review.

(b) Following review subject to subsections (a), (d), and (e) of section 2254, the court shall rule on the claims properly before it.

(Added Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §107(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1223.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to cases pending on or after Apr. 24, 1996, see section 107(c) of Pub. L. 104–132, set out as a note under section 2261 of this title.
### §1911. Supreme Court

The Supreme Court may fix the fees to be charged by its clerk.

The fees of the clerk, cost of serving process, and other necessary disbursements incidental to any case before the court, may be taxed against the litigants as the court directs.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 954.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §330 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §223, 36 Stat. 1153).

The second paragraph was inserted to give statutory sanction to existing practice.

Changes were made in phraseology.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-61338-CIV-SINGHAL/DAMIAN

JEFFREY TRONSEN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner

of Social Security,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS MATTER has come before the Court upon a Report and Recommendation 

Following Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (DE [26]) filed on February 16, 2023, 

recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (DE [22]), 

grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (DE [23]), and affirm the decision of the 

Administrative Law Judge. The Court has reviewed the entire file and record and has 

made a de novo review of the issues. 

[Continued on next page]

Case 0:20-cv-61338-AHS Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/15/2023 Page 1 of 2
No objections to the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation having been 

filed, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (DE [26]) is 

AFFIRMED and ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (DE [22]) is DENIED.

3. The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (DE [23]) is GRANTED.

4. The Administrative Law Judge’s Decision is AFFIRMED.

5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Any other pending 

motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 15th day of 

March 2023.

Copies furnished counsel via CM/ECF

Case 0:20-cv-61338-AHS Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/15/2023 Page 2 of 2
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-028 February 22, 2000

NRC CONSIDERS CHANGES TO REGULATIONS FOR STRUCTURES,

SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS AT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS BASED

ON SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is issuing an advance notice of proposed rulemaking to

seek public comments on a proposal that would revise the regulatory controls for structures, systems

and components (SSC’s) at nuclear power plants based on their safety significance.

NRC regulations call for conservative safety margins, strict procedural controls and multiple

safety systems to establish defense-in-depth for the protection of public health and safety. Special

regulatory controls -- rigorous design qualifications, record-keeping, maintenance and testing

requirements -- are used to ensure that SSC’s necessary to safely shut down a nuclear reactor and

prevent off-site releases function effectively during and after an accident.

Due to the evolving nature of nuclear reactor safety regulations, these requirements encompass

a very broad scope of SSC’s -- some of which are very important to safety; others of which, experience

and new analytical techniques indicate, provide only minimal, or a negligible contribution to safety,

thereby possibly focusing NRC staff and licensee resources on issues of minor safety significance.

The proposed changes use up-to-date analytic tools and risk insights, and further enhance plant

safety by enabling nuclear power plant licensees to more precisely determine the safety significance of

SSC’s. If licensees chose to use the proposed alternative approach, some SSC’s of “low safety

significance” might only require normal industrial or commercial-grade regulatory controls. “Safety

significant” SSC’s may require additional regulatory controls. This would enable both nuclear power

plant licensees and the NRC to more efficiently focus their resources on issues of greater safety

significance, contributing to enhanced plant safety.

The proposed changes may amend Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21

(Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance); Part 50 (Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization

Facilities); Part 52 (Early Site Permits; Standard Design Certifications; and Combined Licenses for

Nuclear Power Plants); Part 54 (Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power

Plants) and Part 100 (Reactor Site Criteria). The NRC plans on holding a series of public meetings to

discuss key technical issues raised by the proposed rulemaking.
Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the proposed amendments within

75 days after publication of a Federal Register notice, expected shortly. The comments should be

addressed to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001,

Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. Comments may also be submitted via the NRC's

interactive rulemaking web site at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov .

##
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 194 (Thursday, October 7, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22532]



[[Page 60152]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 04-20802) published on page 
55632 of the issue for Wednesday, September 15, 2004.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland heading, the entry for 
Park National Corporation, Newark, Ohio, is revised to read as follows:
    1. Park National Corporation, Newark, Ohio; to acquire First 
Federal Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire First Federal 
Savings Bank of Eastern Ohio, both of Zanesville, Ohio, and thereby 
engage in operating a savings association, pursuant to section 
225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y. After the acquisition and subsequent 
bank merger, First Federal Savings Bank will convert to a national bank 
and Park National Corporation will operate the bank, pursuant to 
section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act.
    Comments on this application must be received by October 12, 2004.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 1, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-22532 Filed 10-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
### §1143a. Studies by Comptroller General

#### (1) In general

The Comptroller General of the United States may, pursuant to the request of any Member of Congress, study employee benefit plans, including the effects of such plans on employees, participants, and their beneficiaries.

#### (2) Access to books, documents, etc.

For the purpose of conducting studies under this section, the Comptroller General, or any of his duly authorized representatives, shall have access to and the right to examine and copy any books, documents, papers, records, or other recorded information—

(A) within the possession or control of the administrator, sponsor, or employer of and persons providing services to any employee benefit plan, and

(B) which the Comptroller General or his representative finds, in his own judgment, pertinent to such study.

The Comptroller General shall not disclose the identity of any individual or employer in making any information obtained under this section available to the public.

#### (3) Definitions

For purposes of this section, the terms "employee benefit plan", "participant", "administrator", "beneficiary", "plan sponsor", "employee", and "employer" are defined in section 1002 of this title.

#### (4) Effective date

The preceding provisions of this section shall be effective on April 7, 1986.

(Pub. L. 99–272, title XI, §11016(d), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 275.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Single-Employer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1986, and also as part of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, and not as part of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 which comprises this chapter.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

No. III-00-16 April 14, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO DISCUSS D.C. COOK RESTART PLANS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with American Electric Power Company

officials Tuesday, April 18, to discuss the status of D.C. Cook Nuclear Power Station’s preparations

for resuming operations. The plant has been shut down since September 1997.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held at 1 p.m. EST in the plant’s Training

Building. The plant is located at 7700 Red Arrow Highway between Bridgman and Stevensville,

Michigan. NRC staff members have been meeting periodically with plant and utility officials to

discuss the status of the plant’s preparations for restart. Additional public meetings will be scheduled

prior to restart.

During the April 18 meeting, NRC and utility officials will discuss D.C. Cook Unit 2's

preparations to restart, and review the progress of restart plans and activities.

The NRC recently revised its schedule for the two principal remaining inspections which will

assess the readiness of Unit 2 to restart. The inspections, originally scheduled for early April, were

rescheduled at the licensee’s request to begin May 8. The Restart Readiness Assessment Team

Inspection, which will be conducted by a 10-person team, is scheduled to last two weeks. The second

inspection, which will review any maintenance and modification work which has been deferred until

after restart, will last a week. This schedule is consistent with the licensee’s current plan for

completing restart preparations.

Following the completion of the inspections and other NRC assessments, the NRC staff will

advise the licensee of its view of the readiness of Unit 2 for restart. The second reactor on site, Unit 1,

will receive similar scrutiny before it resumes operation.

Both D.C. Cook units have been shut down since September 1997 after an NRC design

inspection questioned the capabilities of key plant emergency systems to meet their design

requirements.

#####
#### § 3176.10 Variances from requirements.

An operator may request the authorized officer to approve a variance from any of the requirements prescribed in §§ 3176.5 through 3176.9. All such requests shall be submitted in writing to the appropriate authorized officer and provide information as to the circumstances which warrant approval of the variance(s) requested and the proposed alternative methods by which the related requirement(a) of minimum standard(s) are to be satisfied. The authorized officer, after considering all relevant factors, may approve the requested variance(s) if it is determined that the proposed alterative(s) meets or exceeds the objectives of the applicable requirement(s) or minimum standard(s).