alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2615

RICHARD KENT, Petitioner, versus NORFOLK SHIPBUILDING & DRYDOCK CORPORATION;BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (99-206) Submitted: May 10, 2000 Decided: September 6, 2000 Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. John H. Klein, MONTAGNA, KLEIN & CAMDEN, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia, for Petitioner. Richard E. Garriott, Jr., CLARKE, DOLPH, RAPAPORT, HARDY & HULL, P.L.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Richard Norris Kent petitions this court for review of a decision and order of the Benefits Review Board ("Board") affirming the administrative law judge's denial of longshore benefits on the ground that Kent's injury did not occur on a covered situs, as required by 33 U.S.C.A. § 903(a) (West 1986 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal, and our review discloses that the Board's decision is supported by substantial evidence, is rational, and is in accordance with the law. See Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp. v. Hord, 193 F.3d 797, 800 (4th Cir. 1999) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, because we find that the site of the injury is not a covered situs, see Sidwell v. Express Container Servs., Inc. , 71 F.3d 1134, 1138-40 (4th Cir. 1995), we deny Kent's petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See Kent v. Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp. , No. 99- 206 (B.R.B. Oct. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32

                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Thomas R. Butkus, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Lyn
G. Rupich, President and Pamela N. Favero, Chief Financial Officer of AJS
Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") each certify in their capacity as officers of the
Company that they have reviewed the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K
for the fiscal ended December 31, 2003 and that to the best of their knowledge:

1.    the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003.

March 23, 2004                              /s/ Thomas R. Butkus
Date                                        ---------------------------
                                            Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                            Executive Officer


March 23, 2004                              /s/ Lyn G. Rupich
Date                                        ------------------
                                            President

March 23, 2004                              /s/ Pamela N. Favero
Date                                        ---------------------------
                                            Chief Financial Officer
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Bike the Nauset Bike Trail

Cape Cod National Seashore
<page>                                          EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter World
Currency Fund L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:  /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:	   Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:  President

Date:   November 15, 2004
#### Katherine Burger, Respondent-Appellant, v. Philip Neumann, Appellant-Respondent.

*711In our opinion the questions of fact presented were for the jury to determine, and the jury’s determination was not contrary to the weight of the evidence. Nolan, P. J., Carswell and Sneed, JJ., concur; Johnston and Adel, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and judgment and to grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence.
Exhibit 32(b)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, OF THE


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rocky Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James E. McDonald, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ James E. McDonald


James E. McDonald, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


April 29, 2011
### [§§1255, 1256. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §123, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 36]

Section 1255, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 928, authorized Supreme Court to review cases in Court of Claims by writ of certiorari and by certification of questions of law.

Section 1256, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 928, authorized Supreme Court to review cases in Court of Customs and Patent Appeals by writ of certiorari.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as an Effective Date of 1982 Amendment note under section 171 of this title.
No: 23-048 August 14, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC to Issue Final Rule for Emergency Preparedness 

For Small Modular Reactors and Other New Technologies

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has directed the staff to issue a final rule and 

associated regulatory guide that applies risk-informed, performance-based emergency 

preparedness requirements to small modular reactors and other new technologies. These 

technologies include non-light-water reactors, research and test reactors and medical 

radioisotope facilities. 

The rule, to be published in the Federal Register later this year, builds on the NRC’s 

existing emergency preparedness program for large, light-water cooled nuclear power reactors. 

The rule and related guidance, when published, will address how state-of-the-art facility designs 

and safety research apply to future operation of small modular reactors and other new 

technologies. 

The rule’s emergency preparedness framework adopts a technology-inclusive and 

consequence-oriented approach. The requirements include a scalable method to determine the 

size of the offsite emergency planning zone around a facility. Applicants and licensees for SMRs 

and other new technologies can use the rule in developing a performance-based emergency 

preparedness program as an alternative to the current offsite radiological emergency planning 

requirements. 

This rule excludes: large light-water reactors (those licensed to produce greater than 

1,000 megawatts thermal power); fuel cycle facilities; and currently operating research and test 

reactors. These classes of facilities remain under the current requirements.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR part 404.6, announcement is made of the availability for licensing of U.S. Patent No. US 6,800,155 B2 entitled “Conductive (Electrical, Ionic and Photoelectric) Membrane Articlers, and Method For Producing Same” issued October 5, 2004. This patent has been assigned to the United States Government as represented by the Secretary of the Army.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Robert Rosenkrans at U.S. Army Soldier Systems Center, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760, Phone: (508) 233-4928 or E-mail:                         *Robert.Rosenkrans@natick.army.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Any licenses granted shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR Part 404.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-23232  Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### Central Savings Bank in the City of New York, Respondent, v. Annie Zuck, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 9, 2007



/s/ Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr. Chief Financial
Officer
#### The City of New York, Respondent, v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company and Another, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchki ss, J J.
EXHIBIT 12



ARAMARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (A)

(In thousands)



|                                                                            |  | Fiscal Year Ended |        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | -------
|                                                                            |  | October 1,        |        
|                                                                            |  | 1999              |        
|Income from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest |  | $                 | 204,017
|Fixed charges, excluding capitalized interest                               |  |                   | 171,870
|Other, net                                                                  |  |                   | (4,171 
|                                                                            |  |                   |        
|Earnings, as adjusted                                                       |  | $                 | 371,716
|                                                                            |  |                   |        
|                                                                            |  |                   |        
|Interest expense                                                            |  | $                 | 138,718
|                                                                            |  |                   |        
|Portion of operating lease rentals representative of interest factor        |  |                   | 33,152 
|                                                                            |  |                   |        
|Fixed charges                                                               |  | $                 | 171,870
|                                                                            |  |                   |        
|                                                                            |  |                   |        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                          |  |                   | 2.2    
|                                                                            |  |                   |        

---

|(A) |  | For the purpose of determining the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings include pre-tax income from continuing operations plus fixed charges (excluding capitalized
interest). Fixed charges consist of interest on all indebtedness (including capitalized interest) plus that portion of operating lease rentals representative of the interest factor (deemed to be one-third of operating lease rentals).
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



1
Trail of Tears 

National Historic Trail 

Tennessee, North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, 

Kentucky, Illinois, Arkansas, Missouri, Oklahoma 

A Journey of Injustice 

In 1838, the United States government forcibly 

removed about 15,000 Cherokee people from their 

homelands in Tennessee, Alabama, North Carolina, 

and Georgia, and sent them to Indian Territory, 

present-day Oklahoma 

The soldiers came and took us from our home. They 

first surrounded our house and took the mare while 

we were at work in the fields...and [they] did not 

permit us to take anything with us, not even a second 

change of clothes. Ooloo-Cha, widow of Sweet Water 

Hundreds of Cherokee died in removal camps, on 

flat bed boats, and during the 800-mile walk west. 

Harsh weather, poor food supplies, and the spread of 

sickness affected these traveling parties. But once in 

Indian Territory, the Cherokee reconstructed their lives 

and rebuilt their nation, proving resilience. This is a 

story of racial injustice, intolerance, and suffering, but 

it is also one of Indian tenacity and survival. 

Walking the Trail of Tears - Location 
Retrace the Trail 

The sites along the Trail of Tears 

National Historic Trail, stretching 

5,043 miles across nine states, 

together form a journey of 

compassion and understanding. 

Visiting these sites takes in-depth 

trip planning. Sites are in private, 

municipal, tribal, federal, and state 

ownership. Check private sites for 

access. Check public sites for hours. 

Be sure to pick up local maps. At 

www.nps.gov/trte click Plan Your Visit 

and then Places To Go. 

FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

National Park Service 

www.nps.gov/trte 

505-988-6098 

Trail of Tears Association 

www.nationaltota.org 

501-666-9032 

Follow higway signs Scan this code for 

to Trail of Tears sites www.nps.gov/trte 

and trail segments.
No: 23-012 February 27, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Issues Final Safety Evaluation Report

for SHINE Medical Technologies Operating License

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff have completed their Final Safety Evaluation 

Report on SHINE Medical Technology LLC’s application for a license to operate a medical 

isotope production facility in Janesville, Wisconsin. The report concludes there are no safety 

aspects that would preclude issuing the license for operation of the facility. 

The staff finalized the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement regarding the 

SHINE application on Jan. 31, 2023. The agency will consider both documents in deciding 

whether to issue the license.

SHINE filed the application on July 17, 2019, seeking the license to operate the facility, 

currently under construction in Janesville. The facility would create molybdenum-99, which 

subsequently produces technetium-99m, an isotope used in over 30 different diagnostic medical 

imaging procedures. Information concerning the operating license review, with proprietary 

details removed, is available on the NRC website.
EXHIBIT
10.7


 


AMENDMENT
TO PSA


 


THIS
AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) is attached to and made a part of that certain Purchase Agreement (the “PSA”)
dated October 28, 2020 for Willamette Group Trust (hereinafter referred to as the “Purchaser”) and Richard & Reagan
Dean (“Seller”) collectively referred to as the Parties.


 


The
parties further agree to amend the PSA as follows:


1.                 
Effective Date. January 10, 2021.


2.                 
Updated Terms of the PSA. The Parties
agree that the terms of the base PSA shall remain effective with these amendments agreed upon by the Parties;


(a)
Section 1.1(a) & (c) – Consideration dates for both amounts shall be amended to 6/30/21 or sooner as agreed
upon by the Parties.


 


3.                 
Counterparts; Electronic Signatures. It is understood and agreed that this Amendment shall be and become binding
upon being executed in counterparts. Additionally, telefax and electronically transmitted signatures shall be binding the same
as originals.


4.                 
Continued Effectiveness. Except as modified
hereby, the PSA shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment with the intent that of amending the original PSA.


  


	SELLER:	PURCHASER:
	 	 
	RICHARD
    & REAGAN DEAN	WILLAMETTE
    GROUP TRUST
	 	 
	By:
    /s/ Richard Dean	By:
    /s/ Pete Gonzalez
	Name:
    Richard Dean	Name:
    Pete Gonzalez
	 	Title:
    Trustee
	 	 
	By:
    /s/ Reagan Dean	 
	Name:
    Reagan Dean
### §878. Foreign educational, charitable, and certain other exempt organizations

**For special provisions relating to foreign educational, charitable, and other exempt organizations, see sections 512(a) and 4948.**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 282, §877; renumbered §878, Pub. L. 89–809, title I, §103(f)(1), Nov. 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 1551; amended Pub. L. 91–172, title I, §101(j)(20), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 528.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1969—Pub. L. 91–172 substituted provisions requiring reference to organizations in sections 512(a) and 4948 for provisions requiring reference to trusts in section 512(a), and struck out reference to unrelated business income.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1969 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–172 applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1969, see section 101(k)(2)(B) of Pub. L. 91–172, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4940 of this title.
(No. 752

Claimant awarded $232.00.)

#### Grinnell Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 14, 1924.*

*Contract*— when *State liable*— supplies *furnished.*The State is liable for supplies furnished to the Department of Public Works and Buildings for the use of the Illinois State Reformatory.

Grinnell Company, for claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim filed by Grinnell Company, Inc., in the sum of $232.00, for material sold and delivered by the claimant to the Department of Public Works and Buildings of the State of Illinois, and for the use of the Illinois State Reformatory at Pontiac, Illinois, a State institution under the supervision and control of the said State of Illinois.

This claim has been investigated by the superintendent of the Division of Purchases and Supplies, Department of Public Works and Buildings, of the State of Illinois, and has been approved by that official.

The Attorney General of Illinois consents to an award in this case im the sum of $232.00.

The court therefore awards the claimant the sum of $232.00 in settlement of this claim.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-cv-22788-DPG

VICTOR ARIZA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

ARC WINGHOUSE LLC d/b/a 

WINGHOUSE BAR & GRILL, 

a Florida limited liability company,

Defendant.

______________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant ARC WINGHOUSE LLC d/b/a 

WINGHOUSE BAR & GRILL ("Defendant") (Plaintiff and Defendant are collectively, the 

"Parties"), by and through their respective undersigned attorneys, and pursuant to Rule 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of all of 

Plaintiff's claims in the action with prejudice. The Parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees, costs, 

and expenses. All Parties consent to the form and content of this Stipulation. 

Dated: March 1, 2022

Respectfully submitted,

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO

Counsel for Plaintiff DURAN, P.A.

4800 North Hiatus Road Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

Sunrise, FL 33351-7919 4640 N.W. 7th Street

T. 954/362-3800 Miami, FL 33126-2309

954/362-3779 (Facsimile) T. 305/266-9780 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com 305/269-8311 (Facsimile)

Email: duranandassociates@gmail.com 

By____s/ Roderick V. Hannah __ By ___s/ Pelayo M. Duran ______

RODERICK V. HANNAH PELAYO M. DURAN

Fla. Bar No. 435384 Fla. Bar No. 0146595

Case 1:20-cv-22788-DPG Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/01/2022 Page 1 of 2
WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP

Counsel for Defendant

1501 South Church Avenue, Suite 200

Tampa, FL 33629

(813) 422-6910

vbeilman@wshblaw.com

gunneson@wshblaw.com

By: /s/Christian M. Gunneson

VINCENT P. BEILMAN III, , ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 16687

CHRISTIAN M. GUNNESON, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 123823

Case 1:20-cv-22788-DPG Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/01/2022 Page 2 of 2