alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5329 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.5329

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act to improve 
                  the program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BILL EMERSON GOOD SAMARITAN FOOD DONATION ACT.
    The Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act (42 U.S.C. 1791) 
is amended--
        (1) in subsection (b)--
            (A) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``or is charged a good 
        Samaritan reduced price'' before the period at the end;
            (B) by redesignating paragraphs (6) through (10) as 
        paragraphs (7) through (11), respectively;
            (C) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following:
        ``(6) Good samaritan reduced price.--The term `good Samaritan 
    reduced price' means, with respect to the price of an apparently 
    wholesome food or apparently fit grocery product, a price that is 
    an amount not greater than the cost of handling, administering, 
    harvesting, processing, packaging, transporting, and distributing 
    the apparently wholesome food or apparently fit grocery product.''; 
    and
            (D) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(12) Qualified direct donor.--The term `qualified direct 
    donor' means a retail grocer, wholesaler, agricultural producer, 
    agricultural processor, agricultural distributor, restaurant, 
    caterer, school food authority, or institution of higher education 
    (as defined in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
    U.S.C. 1002)).''; and
        (2) in subsection (c)--
            (A) in paragraphs (1) and (2), by inserting ``at zero cost 
        or at a good Samaritan reduced price'' after ``needy 
        individuals'' each place it appears;
            (B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4);
            (C) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
        ``(3) Direct donations to needy individuals.--A qualified 
    direct donor shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability 
    arising from the nature, age, packaging, or condition of apparently 
    wholesome food or an apparently fit grocery product that the 
    qualified direct donor donates in good faith to a needy individual 
    at zero cost.''; and
            (D) in paragraph (4) (as so redesignated), by striking 
        ``and (2)'' and inserting ``, (2), and (3)''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-169 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, August 9, 1999)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

(ACRS) has scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on planning and procedures on August

31 in Rockville, Maryland.

The subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and the appointment of a new

member.

The meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. in room T-2B1 of the agency’s Two White Flint North

Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. Those who wish to make oral statements should notify Dr.

John Larkins, at 301-415-7360. Dr. Larkins may also be contacted to confirm the meeting date

and time or to obtain further information.

Other aspects of the meeting will be described in an upcoming edition of the Federal

Register.

###
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

TERI WALTERS and KIM WALTERS, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

UNPUBLISHED 

August 16, 2016 

v No. 319016 

Eaton Circuit Court 

DONALD S. FALIK, D.D.S., d/b/a FALIK 

FAMILY DENTISTRY, ROBERT C. FALIK, 

D.D.S., and JANE DOE, 

LC No. 12-000658-NH 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

ON REMAND 

Before: MURPHY, P.J., and METER and SERVITTO, JJ. 

METER, J. (dissenting). 

 I respectfully dissent for the same reasons expressed in my earlier dissenting opinion. 

Walters v Falik, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued January 29, 

2015 (Docket No. 319016) (METER, J., dissenting). If anything, Elher v Misra, 499 Mich 11; 

___ NW2d ___ (2016), serves to strengthen my position. 

 I would affirm the trial court’s ruling. 

/s/ Patrick M. Meter
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2007      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                       |                      |                                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                       | APPLETON      PAPERS INC. |
|                                       |                      |                                                                  |
| Dated:  March 11,      2008 |                      | /s/      Mark R. Richards                                             |
|                                       | Name:                     |    Mark      R. Richards                               |
|                                       | Title:                    |    Chairman,      President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tufco Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 13, 2005
    /s/ Louis LeCalsey, IIILouis LeCalsey, IIIPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23319]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Notice of Adjustment of Disaster Grant Amounts

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice of an increase of the maximum amount for 
Small Project Grants to State and local governments and private 
nonprofit facilities for disasters declared on or after October 1, 
2004.

DATES: Effective October 1, 2004 and applies to major disasters 
declared on or after October 1, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James A. Walke, Recovery Division, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-
3834.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5206 (the Stafford Act) 
prescribes that FEMA must annually adjust the maximum grant amount made 
under section 422, Small Project Grants, Simplified Procedure, relating 
to the Public Assistance program, to reflect changes in the Consumer 
Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Department of 
Labor.
    FEMA gives notice of an increase of the maximum amount of any Small 
Project Grant made to the State, local government, or to the owner or 
operator of an eligible private nonprofit facility, under section 422 
of the Stafford Act, to $55,500 for all disasters declared on or after 
October 1, 2004.
    FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price 
Index for All Urban Consumers of 2.7 percent for the 12-month period 
ended in August 2004. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. 
Department of Labor released the information on September 16, 2004.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-23319 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Thomas Liguori, certify that:1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Hypercom Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal year that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 16, 2006By: /s/ Thomas Liguori
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 2:20-CV-14211-RLR

SHERRY EDMONDSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION,

DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND CLOSING CASE

This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff Sherry Edmondson’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment. DE 21. The motion was referred to the Honorable Shaniek M. Maynard for a Report 

and Recommendation. DE 2. On July 28, 2021, Judge Maynard issued a Report and 

Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. DE 

26. On August 11, 2021, Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. DE 27.

On August 12, 2021, Defendant filed a response to Plaintiff’s objections. DE 28.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of Judge Maynard’s Report and 

Recommendation, Plaintiff’s objections thereto, Defendant’s response to the objections, and the 

record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the analysis and 

conclusions in the Report and Recommendation and finds Judge Maynard’s recommendation to 

be well reasoned and correct.

For the foregoing reasons, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Magistrate Judge Maynard’s Report and Recommendation [DE 26] is hereby ADOPTED

Case 2:20-cv-14211-RLR Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2021 Page 1 of 2
in its entirety;

2. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 21] is DENIED;

3. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, West Palm Beach, Florida, this 23rd day of 

August, 2021.

_______________________________ 

ROBIN L. ROSENBERG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Case 2:20-cv-14211-RLR Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2021 Page 2 of 2
### [§§5521 to 5523. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(a)(50), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 288]

Section 5521, added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1392; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834, related to establishment and operation of manufacturing bonded warehouses.

A prior section 5521, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 678, related to establishment and operation of manufacturing bonded warehouses, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

Section 5522, added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1393; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834, related to withdrawal of distilled spirits to manufacturing bonded warehouses.

A prior section 5522, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 679, related to withdrawal of distilled spirits to manufacturing bonded warehouses, prior to general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859. See sections 5008(f)(2) and 5214(a) of this title.

Section 5523, added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1394; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834, made special provision for distilled spirits and wines rectified in manufacturing bonded warehouses.

A prior section 5523, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 679, made special provision for distilled spirits and wines rectified in manufacturing bonded warehouses, prior to general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1980, see section 810 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as an Effective Date of 1979 Amendment note under section 5001 of this title.
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA-2006-24785 Directorate Identifier: 2006-NE-20-AD

With whom outside the FAA has this action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? (You might need to submit a 

separate record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “Ex Parte Contacts.”)

ORGANIZATION PERSON 

CONTACTED

DATE RESPONSE

None 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other/Additional Information:
### §1137. Administration

(a) Subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7, of title 5 (relating to administrative procedure), shall be applicable to this subchapter.

(b) Omitted.

(c) No employee of the Department of Labor or the Department of the Treasury shall administer or enforce this subchapter or title 26 with respect to any employee benefit plan under which he is a participant or beneficiary, any employee organization of which he is a member, or any employer organization in which he has an interest. This subsection does not apply to an employee benefit plan which covers only employees of the United States.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §507, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 894; Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7891(a), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2445.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subsec. (b) of this section amended section 5108 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Amendments

1989—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–239 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954", which for purposes of codification was translated as "title 26" thus requiring no change in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1989 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–239 effective, except as otherwise provided, as if included in the provision of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99–514, to which such amendment relates, see section 7891(f) of Pub. L. 101–239, set out as a note under section 1002 of this title.

#### Regulations

Secretary authorized, effective Sept. 2, 1974, to promulgate regulations wherever provisions of this subchapter call for the promulgation of regulations, see section 1031 of this title.
§ 47.65 When will the Secretary approve or disapprove the land exchange? On receipt of the complete land exchange packet from the Commission, the Secretary will approve or disapprove the exchange within 120 calendar days. ( a ) Before approving or disapproving the exchange, the Secretary will review all environmental analyses, appraisals, and all other supporting studies and requirements to determine whether the proposed exchange complies with applicable law and advances the interests of the beneficiaries.
( b ) The Secretary may consult with the beneficiaries when making a determination if a land exchange advances the interests of the beneficiaries.
( c ) After approving or disapproving an exchange, the Secretary will notify DHHL, the Commission, and other officials as required by section 205(b)(2) of the HHLRA. The Secretary will post notice of the determination on the DOI Web site and give email notice of the posting to all those on the notification list maintained by the Office of Native Hawaiian Relations requesting notice of actions by the Secretary.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON , D.C. 20460

Mr. J0rn Skov A/S Vestfrost Falkevej 12 DK-67 05 Esbjerg DENMARK Ms
. Paige Dunn Red Bull North America 12100 Olympic Boulevard, Suite 200 Los Angeles, California 90064 

## ,JUL 1 

## 5 2013
OFFICE OF AIR AND RAD IA TION

Re: Completeness Determination for SNAP Submission for R

-600a (Isobutane) in Retail Food Refrigeration Dear Mr. Skov and Ms. Dunn: Thank you for A/S Vestfrost and Red Bull'sjoint submission to the Environmental Protection Agency for R

-600a in retail food refrigeration
. The EPA established the Significant New Alternatives Policy program to implement section 612 ofthe Clean Air Act. Your submission and the additional information received on May 2, 2013, have been reviewed for completeness. We have found the information to be complete. Here is a summary of information concerning your submission: Substitute name : R-600a Substance(s) the substitute will replace: CFC-12 , HCFC-22, R-502 Sector: Refrigeration and Air Conditioning End-use: Retail Food Refrigeration (stand-alone equipment only) New or retrofit usage : new Date received: May 2 , 2013 Status of submission: complete Based on review ofthe most recent information, your submission has been found complete
. Pending EPA's decision concerning the substitute's acceptability, you may sell and import R600a for use in stand-alone commercial refrigerators , coolers and freezers as ofJuly 31 , 2013. You may also sell and import such equipment containing R

-600a as ofJuly 31 , 2013
.

Internet Addres s (URL) • http // www. epa .gov Recy c l ed/Recyc l ab l e · Printed with Vegetable Oil Based I nks o n 100% Postco nsum er. Process Ch l orine Free Re cycl ed PaperIf you have questions about your submission, please contact me at (202) 343-9445 or vondemhagen.rebecca@ epa. gov . Sincerely,

# 9ft~--- Rebecca von dem Hagen Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch Stratospheric Protection Division
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-03 January 9, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

****************************************************************

MEETING POSTPONED

****************************************************************

NRC STAFF POSTPONES MEETING WITH WISCONSIN ELECTRIC TO DISCUSS

RECENT INSPECTION FINDINGS AND POINT BEACH 2 STARTUP ACTIVITIES

The meetings between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff

and Wisconsin Electric Power Co. officials, planned for Friday

(January 10) in the Two Creeks (WI) Town Hall, have been

postponed because of weather conditions.

The meetings will be rescheduled later.

Two meetings had been planned, one to discuss the findings

of a special NRC team inspection at the Point Beach Nuclear Power

Station. The second meeting was to discuss the status of utility

performance improvement initiatives and to consider issues to be

resolved prior to restarting Unit 2 at the plant.

Unit 2 has been shut down since October of last year for

refueling and for replacement of its steam generators.

#####