alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We, Richard E. Stoddard, Chief Executive Officer and James F. Verhey, Chief Financial Officer of Kaiser Ventures LLC (the Company),
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                     |  |                                         
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: March 26, 2007 |  | /s/ Richard E. Stoddard                 
|                     |  | Richard E. Stoddard                     
|                     |  | Chairman of the Board, President & CEO  
|                     | 
|                     |  | /s/ James F. Verhey                     
|                     |  | James F. Verhey                         
|                     |  | Executive Vice President - CFO          
|                     |  | Principal Financial & Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §143. Saving provisions

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require an individual employee to render labor or service without his consent, nor shall anything in this chapter be construed to make the quitting of his labor by an individual employee an illegal act; nor shall any court issue any process to compel the performance by an individual employee of such labor or service, without his consent; nor shall the quitting of labor by an employee or employees in good faith because of abnormally dangerous conditions for work at the place of employment of such employee or employees be deemed a strike under this chapter.

(June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title V, §502, 61 Stat. 162.)
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 1790** 

MARK A. PANOWICZ , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. SHARON L. HANCOCK, in individual capacity; SHARON L. HANCOCK, Clerk of the Circuit Court for Charles County (in official capacity) , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. ( 8:11

- cv - 02417

- DKC )

Submitted : October 22, 2013 Decided: October 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Mark A. Panowicz, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Scott Curtis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Mark A. Panowicz seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying the parties’ cross

- motions for reconsideration of the court’s order grant ing in part and denying in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss Panowicz’s civil action and denying Panowicz’s motion for leave to amend his complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (200 6 ), and certain interl ocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The order Panowicz seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral or der. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMI SSED
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 387

**Question 387:** In evaluating the use of respirators to limit intakes, in addition to determining the total effective dose equivalent (TEDE), should the evaluation and subsequent decision on whether to use respirators also consider industrial safety hazards associated with wearing respirators? For example, added effort increasing the probability of heat stress, limited range of vision while climbing, or difficulty of maneuvering readily while working in confined spaces due to wearing a respirator may pose potentially greater safety risks than does the potential dose from uptake of airborne radioactive material to which an individual might be exposed by not wearing a respirator.

**Answer:** 10 CFR 20.1702 provides for the use of respirators consistent with maintaining the TEDE as low as is reasonably achievable. A reduction in the TEDE for a worker is not reasonably achievable if an attendant increase in the worker's industrial health and safety risk would exceed the benefit to be obtained by the reduction in the radiation risk associated with the reduction in the TEDE. The NRC has never maintained that application of the ALARA principle requires ignoring factors other than radiation that may have an adverse impact on public health and safety.

(References: 10 CFR 20.1702, 10 CFR 20.1703)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, November 27, 2017
#### § 127.507 Are there EDWOSB and WOSB contracting opportunities at or below the simplified acquisition threshold?

If the requirement is valued at or below the simplified acquisition threshold, the contracting officer may set aside the requirement or award the requirement on a sole source basis as set forth in § 127.503.

[80 FR 55022, Sept. 14, 2015]
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5129 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5129

 To modify the boundary of the Mammoth Cave National Park in the State 
                  of Kentucky, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2022

 Mr. McConnell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To modify the boundary of the Mammoth Cave National Park in the State 
                  of Kentucky, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mammoth Cave National Park Boundary 
Adjustment Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. MAMMOTH CAVE NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

    Section 11 of the Act of June 5, 1942 (56 Stat. 319, chapter 341; 
16 U.S.C. 404c-11), is amended--
            (1) in the second paragraph, by striking ``the sum of not 
        to exceed'' in the first sentence and all that follows through 
        the period at the end of the paragraph and inserting ``such 
        sums as are necessary.''; and
            (2) by inserting after the second paragraph the following:
    ``The Secretary of the Interior may acquire approximately 980 acres 
of the land and any interests in the land generally depicted on the map 
entitled `Mammoth Cave National Park Proposed Southern Boundary 
Expansion Edmonson and Barren Counties, Kentucky', numbered 135/177, 
967, and dated April 28, 2022, for inclusion in the Mammoth Cave 
National Park.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Scott C. Harvard, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Shore Financial Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                                                       
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 20, 2007 |  | /s/    SCOTT C.
HARVARD                               
|                     |  | Scott C. Harvard President and Chief Executive Officer



80
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Kevin
A. Hall, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
LiveDeal, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of LiveDeal, Inc.




Date:
      January 5, 2011By:
                /s/  Kevin
      A. HallKevin
      A. HallPresident
      and Chief Operating Officer




I, Larry
Tomsic, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
LiveDeal, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of LiveDeal, Inc.




Date:
      January 5, 2011By:
                /s/  Larry
      TomsicLarry
      TomsicChief
      Financial Officer


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to LiveDeal, Inc. and will be retained by LiveDeal, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### §256. Determination of commencement of future actions

In determining when an action is commenced for the purposes of section 255 of this title, an action commenced on or after May 14, 1947 under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], the Walsh-Healey Act, or the Bacon-Davis Act,1 shall be considered to be commenced on the date when the complaint is filed; except that in the case of a collective or class action instituted under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, or the Bacon-Davis Act,1 it shall be considered to be commenced in the case of any individual claimant—

(a) on the date when the complaint is filed, if he is specifically named as a party plaintiff in the complaint and his written consent to become a party plaintiff is filed on such date in the court in which the action is brought; or

(b) if such written consent was not so filed or if his name did not so appear—on the subsequent date on which such written consent is filed in the court in which the action was commenced.

(May 14, 1947, ch. 52, §7, 61 Stat. 88.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, referred to in text, is act June 25, 1938, ch. 676, 52 Stat. 1060, which is classified generally to chapter 8 (§201 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 201 of this title and Tables.

The Walsh-Healey and Bacon-Davis Acts, referred to in text, are defined for purposes of this chapter in section 262 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-63 June 4, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of Public Service Electric and Gas Company (PSE&G) on

Monday morning, June 9, to discuss the NRC's Restart Assessment

Team inspection for Salem unit 2. PSE&G also will make a

presentation on its readiness to restart the unit.

The meeting, which is open to the public for observation

only, will begin at 9:00 a.m., in the Access Processing Center at

the site.

#
#### Rapid Fireproof Door Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Walter Kidde Constructors, Incorporated, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
#### §§ 206.378-206.389 [Reserved]
HomeAbout NRCFire ProtectionRelated Information

# Fire-Related  Inspection Manual Chapters

The fundamental task of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is to ensure that planned and existing licensed operations can be (and are being) conducted without undue risk to the public. Toward that end, the NRC staff regularly conducts inspections for the following purposes:
        - Provide a basis for recommending issuance, denial, continuation, modification, or revocation of an NRC permit or license.
        - Identify conditions within inspected areas that may adversely affect public safety, so that appropriate corrective action(s) can be taken.
        - Evaluate the effectiveness of the licensee's performance in general, as well as in each inspection program area.
        - Assess the licensee's compliance with NRC regulations, licenses, and orders.

The following table lists the inspection manual chapters (IMCs) that the NRC has developed to guide these inspections in the area of fire protection. The complete collection of IMCs is available through the NRC Library.

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 10 CFR Part 50
          - Guidelines for FP in NPPs
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Procedures
          - Administrative Letters
          - Bulletins
          - Circulars
          - Generic Letters
          - Information Notices
          - Regulatory Issue Summaries
          - Regulatory Guides
          - Commission (SECY) Papers
          - Generic Issues
          - Staff-Prepared NUREGs
          - Contractor-Prepared NUREGs
          - Conference Proceedings
          - Brochures
          - FAQs About Fire Protection

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020
###### Editorial Note on Part 126

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 126.617 Who decides contract disputes arising between a certified HUBZone small business concern and a contracting activity after the award of a HUBZone contract?

For purposes of the Disputes Clause of a specific HUBZone contract, the contracting activity will decide disputes arising between a certified HUBZone small business concern and the contracting activity.

[69 FR 29426, May 24, 2004, as amended at 84 FR 65249, Nov. 26, 2019]
**Exhibit 32**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brightec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick Planche, President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

| (1)    | The Report   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
| (2)    | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| /s/ Patrick   Planche                    |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                          |   |
| Patrick   Planche, President,            |   |
| Chief   Executive Officer, Treasurer and |   |
| Chief   Financial Officer                |   |
| November 20,   2006                      |   |

E-2
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHypervelocity impact physicsAll large spacecraft are susceptible to impacts by meteoroids and orbiting space debris. These impacts occur at extremely high speed and can damage flight-critical systems, which can in turn lead to a catastrophic failure of the spacecraft. Therefore, the design of a spacecraft for a long-duration mission must take into account the possibility of such impacts and their effects on the spacecraft structure and on all of its exposed subsystems components. The work performed under the contract consisted of applied research on the effects of meteoroid/space debris impacts on candidate materials, design configurations, and support mechanisms of long term space vehicles. Hypervelocity impact mechanics was used to analyze the damage that occurs when a space vehicle is impacted by a micrometeoroid or a space debris particle. An impact analysis of over 500 test specimens was performed to generate by a hypervelocity impact damage database.Document ID19910009851Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSchonberg, William P.*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Bean, Alan J.*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Darzi, Kent*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:4343NASA-CR-4343Accession Number91N19164Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-36955Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910009851.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### In the Matter of the Application of Schwartz & Cohn, Inc., Appellant, for Leave to Withdraw Moneys, etc. Allwin Construction Company, Respondent.

Order of the County Court of Kings county affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam. JJ., concurred.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-46 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Wednesday, August 18, 1999)

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have announced the

assignment of Russell Gibbs as the new Senior Resident Inspector at the Sequoyah Nuclear

Plant in Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee.

Before being assigned to Sequoyah, Gibbs was a resident inspector at Virginia Power’s

North Anna nuclear power plant in Mineral, Virginia. Before his North Anna assignment, he

was a reactor engineer in the NRC’s Region I office in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania where

he joined the NRC in 1996. He previously worked for Carolina Power & Light at the Brunswick

nuclear plant in Southport, North Carolina and at CP&L’s corporate office in Raleigh, North

Carolina. Gibbs has a B.S. degree in biology and a B.A. degree in chemistry from the

University of North Carolina at Wilmington in Wilmington, North Carolina.

Gibbs joins NRC Resident Inspectors Doug Starkey and Ross Telson, and Site

Secretary Linda Wilson at the Sequoyah plant. The NRC inspectors at Sequoyah can be

reached at 423-842-8001.

#