alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAgreement StatesIndiana: Non-Agreement State

# Indiana Agreement Application Process

The NRC provides assistance to States expressing interest in establishing programs to assume NRC regulatory authority under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Section 274 of the Act provides a statutory basis under which NRC relinquishes to the States portions of its regulatory authority to license and regulate byproduct, source, and certain quantities of special nuclear materials. The State Agreement and Liaison Programs Branch in the Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards (NMSS) has the programmatic lead at the NRC for processing an Agreement application.

The Commission and a State may enter an Agreement whereby the Commission discontinues regulatory authority over a specific category of materials or class of facilities. The State of Indiana has requested an agreement for the authority to regulate byproduct, source, and special nuclear material of a certain quantity, but not the authority to regulate 11e.(2) byproduct material (mill tailings), low-level waste disposal or evaluation of sealed sources and devices. Once the Agreement process is completed, the NRC will transfer the licenses for approximately 200 academic, commercial and medical facilities to the State of Indiana.

The NRC staff evaluates the State's Agreement materials program using NMSS Procedure SA-700, "Processing an Agreement" and its associated handbook. The staff's assessment will need to show that the Agreement materials program satisfies the Commission policy statement "Criteria for Guidance of States and NRC in Discontinuance of NRC Regulatory Authority and Assumption Thereof by States Through Agreement" (46 FR 7540; January 23, 1981 and 48 FR 33376; July 21, 1983). There are several steps in the Agreement process. The table below includes the steps in the process and provides the status for the State of Indiana's Agreement application.

Indiana's Agreement will assume authority over byproduct material as defined in Sections 11e(1), of the AEA, Byproduct material as defined in Sections 11e(3), of the AEA, Byproduct material as defined in Sections 11e(4), of the AEA, Source material, and Special nuclear material in quantities not sufficient to form a critical mass. Once the Agreement process is completed, the NRC will transfer the licenses for approximately 200 academic, commercial and medical facilities to the State of Indiana. The process steps can be seen in the table below.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 24, 2024
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration Concerning Certain Differences between St. John’s Guild, a Corporation of the State of New York, Appellant, and Durkin & Laas, a Copartnership Composed of Charles F. Laas and Alice M. Durkin, Respondent.

Appeal from, an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 30th day of November, 1914, denying a motion for judgment upon an award of arbitrators, and also (as stated in the notice of appeal) from an order entered on the 19th day of December, 1914, refusing a resettlement of the prior order.

Per Curiam:

The objection that the arbitrators were not sworn is a fatal one, the oaths not having been waived in writing. (Code Civ. Proc: § 2369; *Hinkle*v. Zimmerman, 184 N. Y. 114.) The case appears to be a proper one, however, in which to direct a rehearing before the same arbitrators as authorized by section 2374 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Their failure to take the prescribed oaths did not, under the circumstances, indicate partiality or incompetence. The order appealed from will, therefore, be modified accordingly, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. Order to be settled on notice.
### SUBCHAPTER III—REPORTING BY LABOR ORGANIZATIONS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF LABOR ORGANIZATIONS, AND EMPLOYERS
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-119 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the quarterly report of Willbros Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Warren
L. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 7, 2004                                     /s/ Warren L. Williams
                                                --------------------------------
                                                        Warren L. Williams
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Meghan Leanne Garza, * From the 161st District Court

o f Ector County, Texas

Trial Court No. B

- 16

- 0 297

- CR

.

Vs. No. 11

- 16

- 00149

- CR * December 15 , 2016

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the

appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, in accordance with

this court ’ s opinion, the appe al is dismissed.
IDENTIFIED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 

Request for Amendments to FAA 333 UAS Exemption 

Exemption No. 12089 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-QSS6 

Contact: Brad Cossin 

V. P. Aviation & Regulation 

6534 Hamilton Ave 

Pittsburgh, PA 15206 

Bcossi n@ identifiedtech .com 

412.974.3060 
As the UAV manufacturer, Identified Technologies Corporation is requesting 

amendments to their existing 333 exemption as listed and described below. The purpose for 

the amendments is to be able to offer the services as listed in the existing 333 exemption in a 

safer more efficient manner and to update the FAA with the most up to date information 

regarding Identified Technologies Corporation and its operations. Each amendment will serve to 

increase the safety, functionality and usefulness of UAS's with the intention to create safer 

working environments in the industries in which they are deployed. 

1. Additional Aircraft Types 

Identified Technologies Corporation would like to add the following additional UAS operating 

platforms to the existing exemption. 

A. The Boomerang - is a quadrotor designed in-house using commercial off-the-shelf 

(COTS) components. Manufacturer: Identified Technologies Corporation. By using a collection 

of best-in-class components, Identified Technologies Corporation is able to construct a very 

reliable vehicle, with additional features and incorporates the 3D Robotics PixHawk auto pilot 

system as listed in the current 333 exemption conditions and limitations paragraph 1. The 

Boomerang meets all weight, speed and other criteria spelled out in the current 333 exemption. 

The Boomerang UAS was designed primarily for data collection applications. The proprietary 

pilot operating handbook (POH) will be emailed directly to 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

B. The 3DR IRIS+ Quadcopter- is kit built production model. The 3DR IRIS+ Quadcopter 

meets all weight, speed and other criteria spelled out in the current 333 exemption. The 3DR 

IRIS+ (915) Quadcopter will be used primarily for flight training and data collection applications. 

The pilot operating handbook (POH) will be emailed directly to 333exemptions@faa.gov 

Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you for your time in this 

matter. 

Brad Cossin. V.P Aviation & Regulation. 412.974.3060. Bcossin@identifiedtech.com
EXHIBIT 2

Case 1:20-cv-22578-MGC Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-22578-MGC Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2020 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.524 When is SBA released from liability on its guarantee? ( a ) SBA is released from liability on a loan guarantee (in whole or in part, within SBA's exclusive discretion), if any of the events below occur: ( 1 ) The Lender has failed to comply materially with any Loan Program Requirement for 7(a) loans.
( 2 ) The Lender has failed to make, close, service, or liquidate a loan in a prudent manner;
( 3 ) The Lender's improper action or inaction has placed SBA at risk;
( 4 ) The Lender has failed to disclose a material fact to SBA regarding a guaranteed loan in a timely manner;
( 5 ) The Lender has misrepresented a material fact to SBA regarding a guaranteed loan;
( 6 ) SBA has received a written request from the Lender to terminate the guarantee;
( 7 ) The Lender has not paid the guarantee fee within the period required under SBA rules and regulations;
( 8 ) The Lender has failed to request that SBA purchase a guarantee within 180 days after maturity of the loan. However, if the Lender is conducting liquidation or debt collection litigation in connection with a loan that has matured, SBA will be released from its guarantee only if the Lender fails to request that SBA purchase the guarantee within 180 days after the completion of the liquidation or debt collection litigation;
( 9 ) The Lender has failed to use required SBA forms or exact electronic copies; or
( 10 ) The Borrower has paid the loan in full.
( b ) If SBA determines, at any time, that any of the events set forth in paragraph (a) of this section occurred in connection with that loan, SBA is entitled to recover any moneys paid on the guarantee plus interest from the Lender. In the exercise of its rights, SBA may utilize all legal means available, including offset and judicial remedies.
( c ) If the Lender's loan documentation or other information indicates that one or more of the events in paragraph (a) of this section occurred, SBA may undertake such investigation as it deems necessary to determine whether to honor or deny the guarantee, and may withhold a decision on whether to honor the guarantee until the completion of such investigation.
( d ) Any information provided to SBA by a Lender or other party will not prejudice, or be construed as effecting any waiver of, SBA's right to deny liability for a guarantee if one or more of the events listed in paragraph (a) of this section occur.
( e ) Unless SBA provides written notice to the contrary, the Lender remains responsible for all loan servicing ad liquidation actions until SBA honors its guarantee in full.
[61 FR 3235, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 72 FR 18361, Apr. 12, 2007; 82 FR 39503, Aug. 21, 2017]
### §1349. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–203, title IX, §9312(a), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–361

Section, Pub. L. 93–406, title IV, §4049, as added Pub. L. 99–272, title XI, §11012(a), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 258; amended Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1879(u)(2), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2913; Pub. L. 100–203, title IX, §9312(d)(2), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–364, related to distribution of liability payments to participants and beneficiaries.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable with respect to plan terminations under section 1341 of this title with respect to which notices of intent to terminate are provided under section 1341(a)(2) of this title after Dec. 17, 1987, and plan terminations with respect to which proceedings are instituted by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation under section 1342 of this title after that date, see section 9312(d)(1) of Pub. L. 100–203, as amended, set out as an Effective Date of 1987 Amendment note under section 1301 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001046002
<NAME> ALLIANCE BANCORP OF NEW ENGLAND, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          18,584
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              28
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     53,156
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          27,857
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            27,201
<LOANS>                                        191,632
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,937
<DEPOSITS>                                     251,391
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,624
<LONG-TERM>                                     39,575
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 306,937
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,637
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,820
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   557
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                21,014
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,831
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,668
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,346
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      237
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  75
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,083
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,026
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,026
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,922
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.88
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,218
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,800
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,060
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      146
<RECOVERIES>                                        49
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,200
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,200
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            467




</TABLE>
### §50b. Appointment of employees

The Secretary of Labor is authorized to appoint such employees as he may from time to time find necessary for the administration of this chapter, with regard to existing laws applicable to the appointment and compensation of employees of the United States.

(Aug. 16, 1937, ch. 663, §3, 50 Stat. 665; July 12, 1943, ch. 221, title VII, 57 Stat. 518.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Proviso authorizing employment of certain persons in the division of apprentice training of National Youth Administration, was omitted in view of abolition of that agency by act July 12, 1943.

Provision formerly in this section relieved National Youth Administration, after August 16, 1937, of responsibility for promotion of labor standards of apprenticeship, and directed transfer of records and papers to Department of Labor.
#### § 295.7 Authority to settle or compromise claims.

Notwithstanding any other provision of these regulations, the Director of OCGFC may extend an offer to settle or compromise a claim or any portion of a claim, which if accepted by the Claimant will be binding on the Claimant and on the United States, except that the United States may recover funds improperly paid to a Claimant due to fraud or misrepresentation on the part of the Claimant or the Claimant's representative, a material mistake on our part or the Claimant's failure to cooperate in an audit as required by § 295.35.
#### City of New York v. Thomas Darlington et al., as Trustees, Impleaded with Others.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 97-63 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson October 22, 1997

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

E-MAIL: bwh@nrc.gov

GRAND GULF RATED 'SUPERIOR' IN THREE AREAS,

'GOOD' IN ANOTHER, IN LATEST NRC SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station has received an evaluation of "superior" in three

functional areas and "good" in the fourth in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's latest

systematic assessment of licensee performance (SALP) report.

The report was sent October 9 to Entergy Operations, Inc., which operates the

plant near Port Gibson, Miss. It evaluates the plant's performance between February

25, 1996, and September 6 of this year.

NRC and Entergy officials will discuss the report during a meeting set for

9 a.m., October 29, in the Grand Gulf Energy Center Auditorium. The meeting will be

open for public observation. NRC officials will be available afterward to speak with

reporters, state and local officials, and members of the public.

NRC systematic assessment reports rate licensees in four functional areas--plant

operations, maintenance, engineering, and plant support--and assign ratings of

category 1, 2, or 3 which characterize performance as superior, good or adequate.

Grand Gulf was given the following scores on the current SALP and previous SALP in

1996:

Functional areas & ratings

Current Previous

Plant Operations 1 1

Maintenance 1 2

Engineering 1 1

Plant Support 2 1
In his cover letter to the report, NRC Regional Administrator Ellis W. Merschoff

said, “Your performance during this rating period continued to demonstrate Entergy’s

commitment to the safe and conservative operation of the Grand Gulf facility.”

“The superior rating in the Operations area was highlighted by the excellent

performance of the operators during abnormal and non-routine events, and by

management’s safety-conscious decisionmaking,” Mr. Merschoff said. Maintenance

performance was characterized by the improved condition of the plant and the

significant reduction in maintenance-related plant transients.

The superior rating in Engineering was based on the high quality of the systems

engineering functions, the continued emphasis on training within the entire engineering

organization, and the strength of engineering self-assessments.

Plant Support declined due to weaknesses in emergency preparedness. These

weaknesses were noted during NRC inspections and during an exercise held in

September. A decline in performance was also noticed in the implementation of

radiological controls practices.

EDITORS: A copy of the full SALP report is available from this office on request, or on

internet at www.nrc.gov/OPA.
### §53. "Person" or "persons" defined

The word "person" or "persons" wherever used in section 52 of this title shall be deemed to include corporations and associations existing under or authorized by the laws of either the United States, the laws of any of the Territories, the laws of any State, or the laws of any foreign country.

(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §1, 38 Stat. 730.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on the 3d par. of section 1(a) of the Clayton Act (Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, as amended by section 305(b) of Pub. L. 94–435, Sept. 30, 1976). Section 1 of the Clayton Act is classified in its entirety to section 12 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
S. 5328 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two 

An Act 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to extend terminal 

lakes assistance. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TERMINAL LAKES ASSISTANCE. 

Section 2507(f) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment 

Act of 2002 (16 U.S.C. 3839bb–6(f)) is amended by striking ‘‘2023’’ 

and inserting ‘‘2025’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### § 107.1910 Non-waiver of SBA's rights or terms of Leverage security.

SBA's failure to exercise or delay in exercising any right or remedy under the Act or the regulations in this part does not constitute a waiver of such right or remedy. SBA's failure to require you to perform any term or provision of your Leverage does not affect SBA's right to enforce such term or provision. Similarly, SBA's waiver of, or failure to enforce, any term or provision of your Leverage or of any event or condition set forth in § 107.1810 or § 107.1820 does not constitute a waiver of any succeeding breach of such term or provision or condition.
#### Aaron G. Srybnik et al., as Copartners Trading under the Name of S. & S. Machinery Co., v. Peter Amendola et al., as Copartners Trading under the Name of Tamco Manufacturing Co.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Present — Peck, P. .7., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 759.]
EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             FUN CITY POPCORN, INC.
                FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Fun City
Popcorn, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
September 30, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form
10-KSB").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 29, 2004

                                            /s/  James Eller
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 James Eller
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
### §16. Repealed. Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §1(54), 65 Stat. 703

Section, act June 5, 1920, ch. 248, §5, 41 Stat. 987, related to quarters for bureau.