alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-261

December 9, 1999

THERMAL SCIENCE AGREES TO $300,000 SETTLEMENT

WITH NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today announced that Thermal Science, Inc.

(TSI) of St. Louis has agreed to pay a $300,000 settlement of an NRC enforcement action

regarding the company’s Thermo-Lag fire barrier products.

The settlement follows a series of measures taken by the NRC since it began considering

enforcement action against TSI regarding the testing of the company’s Thermo-Lag fire barrier.

NRC investigators found inconsistencies in the testing of Thermo-Lag products in test

reports and other documents submitted by TSI.

Results of the NRC investigation were forwarded to the U.S. Department of Justice,

which presented the matter to a grand jury that indicted TSI and its president, Mr. Rubin

Feldman. But both the firm and its president were acquitted following a criminal trial that ended

in August 1995.

In 1996, the NRC proceeded with a civil action, a proposed civil monetary penalty,

alleging several violations of its regulations by TSI. TSI challenged the NRC’s action in U.S.

District Court on the grounds that (1) it constituted double jeopardy, and (2) NRC lacked

authority to fine non-licensees. The District Court dismissed TSI’s suit last year. TSI appealed,

but the U.S. Court of Appeals denied a motion for a stay of NRC’s administrative process.

TSI subsequently filed an answer to the NRC’s enforcement action, denying any

violations. Although the NRC believed TSI’s arguments to be without merit, the parties agreed to

settle the matter for $300,000 in order to bring this longstanding issue to closure without further

litigation.

A copy of the settlement is posted on the Internet at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/OE/rpr/ea95009.htm.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Form REP-702

Rev. 0, 4/2012

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 10/3/2012

Sample Number: 124155-001 Date Collected: 09/24/2012 08:00 Date Received: 9/26/2012

CPS Effluent

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Bromide, Br 43.5 mg/L 5 1 KLG 10/03/2012 14:00 EPA 300.1

Selenium, Se 394 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 10/01/2012 15:02 EPA 200.8

Chloride, Cl 3750 mg/L 20 5 KLG 10/03/2012 13:33 EPA 300.1

Fluoride, F 60.3 mg/L 1 0.2 KLG 10/03/2012 14:00 EPA 300.1

Sample Number: 124155-002 Date Collected: 09/26/2012 08:00 Date Received: 9/26/2012

CPS Effluent

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Bromide, Br 35.8 mg/L 5 1 KLG 10/03/2012 14:39 EPA 300.1

Selenium, Se 381 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 10/01/2012 15:07 EPA 200.8

Chloride, Cl 3270 mg/L 20 5 KLG 10/03/2012 14:18 EPA 300.1

Fluoride, F 55.5 mg/L 1 0.2 KLG 10/03/2012 14:39 EPA 300.1

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 124155 Page 1 of 1
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Yellowstone
National Park
ID, MT, WY


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Sound Library - Red Fox
 A red fox opens mouth wideRed fox near Soda Butte in the northeastern part of the park. NPS / Jim Peaco

Red Fox
A red fox emits a series of yowls during a quiet night.
Credit / Author:
NPS / Shan Burson
Date created:
10/14/2020
 Last updated: January 6, 2017
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: PO Box 168
Yellowstone National Park,
WY
82190-0168
 Phone: 307-344-7381 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
§ 107.820 Financings in the form of guarantees. At the request of a Small Business or where necessary to protect your existing investment, you may guarantee the monetary obligation of a Small Business to any non-Associate creditor. ( a ) You may not issue a guaranty if: ( 1 ) You would become subject to State regulation as an insurance, guaranty or surety business;
( 2 ) The amount of the guaranty plus any direct Financings to the Small Business exceed the overline limitations of § 107.740, except that a pledge of the Equity Securities of the issuer or a subordination of your lien or creditor position does not count toward your overline; or
( 3 ) The total financing cost to the Small Business exceeds the cost of money limits of § 107.855.
( b ) *Pledge of Licensee's assets as guaranty.* For purposes of this section, a guaranty with recourse only to specific asset(s) you have pledged is equal to the fair market value of such asset(s) or the amount of the debt guaranteed, whichever is less.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



We, William B. Cotton, Chief Executive Officer, and David D. Cryer, Chief Financial Officer, of Flight Safety Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)     The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|August 29, 2008 | By: | /s/ William B. Cotton                        
|--------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------
|                |     |                                              
|                |     | William B. Cotton
Its Chief Executive Officer



|August 29, 2008 | By: | /s/ David D. Cryer                        
|--------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                |     |                                           
|                |     | David D. Cryer
Its Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of TEXAS EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC (Company),
a Delaware limited liability company, acting in its capacity as general partner
of TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership,
does hereby appoint CHARLES H. LEONARD, JAMES C. RUTH AND WILLIAM L. THACKER,
and each of them, his true and lawful attorney and agent to do any and all acts
and things, and execute any and all instruments which, with the advise and
consent of Counsel, said attorney and agent may deem necessary or advisable to
enable the Company to comply with the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, and
any rules, regulations, and requirements thereof, to sign his name as a
director and/or officer of the Company to the Form 10-K Report for TEPPCO
Partners, L.P. and for TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership, each
for the year ended December 31, 2000, and to any instrument or document filed
as a part of, or in accordance with, each said Form 10-K or amendment thereto;
and the undersigned do hereby ratify an confirm all that said attorney and
agent shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have subscribed these presents this
21st day of March, 2001.


/s/ WILLIAM L. THACKER                      /s/ JIM W. MOGG
-----------------------------------         ------------------------------------
    William L. Thacker                          Jim W. Mogg


/s/ MILTON CARROLL                          /s/ FRED J. FOWLER
-----------------------------------         ------------------------------------
    Milton Carroll                              Fred J. Fowler


/s/ CARL D. CLAY                            /s/ MARK A. BORER
-----------------------------------         ------------------------------------
    Carl D. Clay                                Mark A. Borer


/s/ JOHN P. DESBARRES                       /s/ WILLIAM W. SLAUGHTER
-----------------------------------         ------------------------------------
    John P. DesBarres                           William W. Slaughter


/s/ DERRILL CODY                            /s/ WILLIAM L. THACKER
-----------------------------------         ------------------------------------
    Derrill Cody                                William L. Thacker
                                                President and Chief Executive
                                                  Officer
Editorial Note on Part 126
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 126.403 What will SBA review during a program examination? ( a ) SBA may conduct a program examination, or parts of an examination, at one or more of the concern's offices. SBA will determine the location and scope of the examination and may review any information related to the concern's HUBZone eligibility including, but not limited to, documentation related to the location and ownership of the concern, compliance with the 35% HUBZone residency requirement, and the concern's “attempt to maintain” (*see* § 126.103) this percentage.
( b ) SBA may require that a HUBZone small business concern (or applicant) submit additional information as part of the program examination. If SBA requests additional information, SBA will presume that written notice of the request was provided when SBA sends such request to the concern at a mailing address, email address or fax number provided in the concern's profile in the Dynamic Small Business Search (DSBS) or the System for Award Management (SAM) (or successor systems). SBA may draw an adverse inference from a concern's failure to cooperate with a program examination or provide requested information and assume that the information that the HUBZone small business concern (or applicant) failed to provide would demonstrate ineligibility, and decertify (or deny certification) on this basis.
( c ) The concern must retain documentation provided in the course of a program examination for 6 years from the date of submission.
[84 FR 65245, Nov. 26, 2019]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Evonne CASTILLO, also known as Evonne Salinas-Castillo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40533.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 8, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Fernando A. Sanchez, Jr., Law Offices of Fernando A. Sanchez, Laredo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Evonne Castillo appeals her sentence following her jury-trial conviction on two counts of transporting illegal aliens for purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324.

Castillo argues that the district court erred by not applying the three-level reduction under the “other than for profit” clause of U.S.S.G. § 2Ll.l(b)(l). Because *910Castillo was charged with and the jury-found that she transported the illegal aliens “for purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain,” she does not qualify for such a reduction.

Castillo also argues that the district court erred by increasing her sentence for creating a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to another person based on facts not alleged in the indictment or found by the jury, in contravention of *United, States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and in violation of her Sixth Amendment rights. This argument lacks merit. By rendering the Sentencing Guidelines advisory only, *Booker*eliminated the Sixth Amendment concerns that prohibited a sentencing judge from finding all facts relevant to sentencing. *United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 43, 163 L.Ed.2d 76 (2005); *United States v. Alonzo,*435 F.3d 551, 552 (5th Cir.2006).

*Fost-Booker*sentences are reviewed only for “unreasonableness.” *Mares,*402 F.3d at 518. If, in the exercise of discretion, the sentencing judge imposes a sentence within a properly calculated guideline range, we will infer that consideration was afforded all the factors for a fair sentence set forth in the Guidelines. *Id.*at 519. Moreover, given the deference due the sentencing judge’s discretion, we will rarely say that a sentence within the properly calculated Guideline range was unreasonable. *Id.*

Here, the district court fulfilled its duty to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 factors and sentenced Castillo within a properly calculated guidelines range. Castillo has failed to demonstrate that her properly calculated guidelines sentence was unreasonable. *See Mares,*402 F.3d at 519; *Alonzo,*435 F.3d 551, 552.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 23.1** **Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration    Statements    (Form S-8    Nos.    333-40333,333-40457,333-40459,333-40461,333-43622,333-67440,333-97179,333-97181,    and    333-136671)    pertaining to the various stock issuance programs and in the    Registration Statements    (Form S-3    Nos.    333-68202,333-86440    and    333-108521)    of Hypercom Corporation of our reports dated March 14,    2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and    schedule of Hypercom Corporation, Hypercom Corporation    management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal    control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of    internal control over financial reporting of Hypercom    Corporation, included in this Annual Report    (Form 10-K)    for the year ended December 31, 2006. /s/  Ernst &    Young LLP     Phoenix, Arizona    March 14, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0049

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHRISTIAN NYANFORE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 13, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Laurie McKinnon

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 4 2020

06/04/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0049
#### United States Trust Company of New York, Respondent, v. Helen Van Z. Anthony et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
----

----

|   | (1) | the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                  | PAPERWEIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORP. |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------|
|                  |                          |   |
| Dated: March 13, 2013 |                          | /s/ Mark R. Richards |
|                  | Name:                         | Mark R. Richards |
|                  | Title:                        | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-96-72 October 30, 1996

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued the

report by the Augmented Inspection Team (AIT) that reviewed four

events related to reactor coolant inventory control and the

contingency plans for reliable reactor cooling following the

failure of one residual heat removal pump at Connecticut Yankee

Atomic Power Company's Haddam Neck nuclear plant.

The report is available from the Public Affairs Office, in

the Public Document Room or on the internet at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports.

#
----

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1) (2)

(2006/C 26/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

SPAIN

Operating licences granted

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

----

(1)OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

----
No: IV-23-002 February 27, 2023 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128 

NRC Names Scott Schwind Senior Resident Inspector

At Callaway Nuclear Power Plant

The NRC has selected Scott Schwind as the new senior resident 

inspector at the Callaway nuclear power plant in Fulton, Missouri. 

“Scott’s experience as a resident inspector at two other plants, 

combined with his technical knowledge, and his dedication to our safety and 

security mission will enable him to oversee the continued safe operation of 

the Callaway nuclear plant,” said NRC Region IV Acting Administrator Rob 

Lewis. “He is an excellent choice to lead our inspections at Callaway.”

Schwind joined the NRC in 1997 and served as the resident inspector 

at Indian Point 2 and Comanche Peak nuclear power plants. He also was the senior resident 

inspector at the Cooper nuclear power plant. He left the agency in 2007 to pursue other goals and 

returned to the NRC in 2021, and has served as the resident inspector at Callaway since April 2022. 

Schwind holds a Bachelor of Science degree in mathematics and physics and a Master of 

Arts degree in theology. He also served aboard the USS Woodrow Wilson. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. 

Schwind will be joined by an NRC staffer temporarily assigned to help him until a permanent 

resident is named. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, 

monitoring significant work projects, and interacting with plant workers and the public.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-19   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 1 of 4

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-19   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 2 of 4

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-19   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 3 of 4

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-19   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 4 of 4
#### § 146.210 Reporting.

No reporting is required with respect to payments of reasonable compensation made to regularly employed officers or employees of a person.
#### §§ 136.104-136.109 [Reserved]
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**
 **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Insightful
Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the undersigned, Jeffrey
Coombs, President and Chief Executive Officer of Insightful Corporation, does
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1)
    such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2)
    the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Insightful
      Corporation.
 
 
 Date:
    May
      10, 2005
    
    By:
    /s/
      Jeffrey E. CoombsJeffrey
      E. CoombsPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 302.8 Pre-approval Investment Assistance costs.

Project activities carried out before approval of Investment Assistance shall be carried out at the sole risk of the Eligible Applicant. Such activity is subject to the rejection of the application, the disallowance of costs, or other adverse consequences as a result of non-compliance with EDA or Federal requirements, including procurement requirements, civil rights requirements, Federal labor standards, or Federal environmental, historic preservation, and related requirements.

[79 FR 76128, Dec. 19, 2014]
#### John A. Johnson Contracting Corp., Appellant, v. Harold N. Golinvaux et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Thomas Moulding Floor Company, Respondents.

Action to recover damages for breach of contract. Judgment for defendants unanimously affirmed, with costs. Yo opinion. Present— Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.