alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Insightful Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, the undersigned, Jeffrey
Coombs, President and Chief Executive Officer of Insightful Corporation, does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Insightful Corporation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                 |  | 
|----- |  | --------------- |  | 
|Date: |  | August 14, 2006 |  | 





By:

/s/ Jeffrey E. CoombsJeffrey E. CoombsPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.18

October 4, 2001



Albert Irato
400 North Flagler Drive
Apt. 1602
West Palm Beach, FL  33401-4303



Dear Al:


This confirms the terms under which your employment at Hypercom will continue
after the expiration of your Employment Agreement on January 1, 2002.

1.       Position: Strategic Advisor to the Chairman and the CEO. In this
         position you will advise the Chairman and the CEO on strategic and
         industry matters as and when called upon to do so.

2.       Compensation and Benefits: You will be paid a salary of $500 per month
         in accordance with Hypercom's standard payroll practices and subject to
         legally required payroll deductions. Your health insurance benefits
         will continue with the standard health insurance package currently
         available to HYC executives and spouses.

3.       Business Expenses: You will be reimbursed in accordance with Hypercom's
         standard policies and practices for ordinary and necessary business
         expenses incurred by you in the course of your duties, including the
         costs of telephone service to your residence as currently borne by
         Hypercom.

4.       Confidentiality and Related Matters: You will continue to preserve
         Hypercom's confidential information, trade secrets and other items of a
         proprietary nature and will not advise or consult with any competitor
         of Hypercom.

5.       Term. This agreement will expire on December 31, 2002 unless extended
         by mutual agreement.

Please indicate your acceptance of this agreement in the space provided below.
This agreement shall become effective upon its approval by the Board of
Directors at its next scheduled meeting.

Very truly yours,


/s/ JONATHON E. KILLMER                                /s/ ALBERT IRATO
-----------------------                                -------------------------
Jonathon E. Killmer                                    Albert Irato
Executive Vice President                               Director


cc       George Wallner
         Christopher Alexander
         Tom Salamone
         Jock Patton
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before GASTON, STARITA, and MYERS Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Julio C. RODRIGUEZ

- VA Z QUEZ Fireman (E

- 3), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 20 2 100243

_________________________ Decided: 26 January 2022 Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge : Jonathan T. Stevens Sentence adjudged 27 May 2021 by a special court

- martial convened at Naval Submarine Base New London, Connecticut, consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1, confinement for 8 months , and a bad

- conduct discharge. For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander W. Scott Stoebner , JAGC, USN

_________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________United States v. Rodriguez

- Va z quez , NMCCA No. 20 2 100243 Opinion of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1 T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Cou rt

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2016, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Asaf Berenstin, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  May 15, 2017 | /s/ Asaf Berenstin           
|------------------- | -----------------------------
|                    | Asaf Berenstin               
|                    | Chief Financial Officer      
|                    | (Principal Financial Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION BY CONTROLLER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EntreMed, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Dane R. Saglio, as Controller of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by
the Controller of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by
any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.

|                  |  |                                           
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|November 14, 2002 |  | /s/ Dane R SaglioDane R. Saglio
Controller

19
<page>                                             EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter World
Currency Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:  /s/Kevin Perry

Name:	   Kevin Perry
Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date:	August 14, 2006
§ 101.101 Who manages SBA? ( a ) An Administrator, appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, manages SBA. The Administrator— ( 1 ) Is responsible to the President and Congress for exercising direction, authority, and control over SBA.
( 2 ) Determines and approves all policies covering SBA's programs to aid, counsel, assist, and protect the interests of the nation's small businesses.
( 3 ) Employs or appoints employees necessary to implement the Small Business Act, as amended, the Small Business Investment Act, as amended, and other laws and directives.
( 4 ) Delegates certain activities, by issuing regulations or otherwise, to Headquarters and field positions.
( b ) A Deputy Administrator, appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, serves as Acting Administrator during the absence or disability of the Administrator or in the event of a vacancy in the Office of the Administrator.
### SUBCHAPTER II—COMPREHENSIVE EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING SERVICES
### §3322. Local application

Each eligible provider desiring a grant or contract from an eligible agency shall submit an application to the eligible agency containing such information and assurances as the eligible agency may require, including—

(1) a description of how funds awarded under this subchapter will be spent consistent with the requirements of this subchapter;

(2) a description of any cooperative arrangements the eligible provider has with other agencies, institutions, or organizations for the delivery of adult education and literacy activities;

(3) a description of how the eligible provider will provide services in alignment with the local plan under section 3123 of this title, including how such provider will promote concurrent enrollment in programs and activities under subchapter I, as appropriate;

(4) a description of how the eligible provider will meet the State adjusted levels of performance described in section 3141(b)(3) of this title, including how such provider will collect data to report on such performance indicators;

(5) a description of how the eligible provider will fulfill one-stop partner responsibilities as described in section 3151(b)(1)(A) of this title, as appropriate;

(6) a description of how the eligible provider will provide services in a manner that meets the needs of eligible individuals; and

(7) information that addresses the considerations described under section 3321(e) of this title, as applicable.

(Pub. L. 113–128, title II, §232, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1620.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
### §485. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 14, 1954, ch. 472, §2, 68 Stat. 468, which authorized Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to pay assignment holders moneys collected for use of subsurface rights, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2009      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |                      |                                                                  |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  | APPLETON      PAPERS INC. |
|                                  |                      |                                                                  |
| Dated:  March      27, 2009 |                      | /s/      Mark R. Richards                                             |
|                                  | Name:                     |    Mark      R. Richards                               |
|                                  | Title:                    |    Chairman,      President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-61 May 28, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF CITES LOWER BUCKS HOSPITAL FOR ALLEGED VIOLATIONS;

PROPOSES $2,750 FINE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has cited Lower

Bucks Hospital, in Bristol, Pa., for alleged violations of NRC

requirements. The staff has proposed a fine of $2,750.

The NRC staff conducted inspections at Lower Bucks Hospital

on January 9, at Nazareth Hospital in Philadelphia on December

12, and at waste disposal facilities in Morgantown and Allentown,

Pa., to review the circumstances associated with the loss of

control of a nuclear pacemaker (containing approximately 4.8

curies of plutonium-238). In addition, the NRC staff reviewed

analysis of samples taken from the waste sites to determine

whether the pacemaker had been damaged resulting in contamination

at these locations. The sample results did not provide any

evidence of contamination. Based on those inspections and

information provided by Lower Bucks Hospital at a predecisional

enforcement conference on May 13, the NRC staff has determined

that three alleged violations of requirements occurred at the

facility.

In 1978, a patient was given a nuclear pacemaker by staff at

Lower Bucks Hospital as authorized by its NRC license. The

pacemaker was removed at Nazareth Hospital on October 31, 1996,

after the patient died. Although the hospital was notified in

early November that the patient had died and the pacemaker had

been removed, Lower Bucks Hospital did not notify the NRC within

24 hours as required, which constitutes one of the three

violations.

On December 10, Nazareth Hospital notified Lower Bucks that

the pacemaker could not be located and was assumed lost.

Although Lower Bucks had contacted the supplier of the pacemaker

to retrieve the pacemaker and properly dispose of it, the

licensee did not ensure appropriate control and disposal. These

failures resulted in two additional violations of NRC

requirements.

During its inspection, the NRC learned of two additional

instances (January 5, 1981 and September 18, 1983), in which

pacemakers were buried with patients, and one additional instance

in which the pacemaker was not returned to the supplier (August

1987). In addition, in 1987 two pacemakers were buried with

patients.
In a letter to Lower Bucks Hospital, NRC Region I

Administrator Hubert J. Miller said, "As the hospital that had

initially implanted the pacemakers, as authorized by your NRC

license..., you were responsible for taking appropriate and

timely action to ensure proper retrieval and disposal of

pacemakers. This did not occur. Given the significance of

improper disposal of this material, the violations have been

classified in the aggregate as a Severity Level III problem..."

Lower Bucks has 30 days either to pay the proposed fine or

to request in writing that part or all of it be withdrawn.

#
###### Editorial Note on Part 126

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 126.608 Are there HUBZone contract opportunities at or below the simplified acquisition threshold or micropurchase threshold?

A CO may make a requirement available as a HUBZone set-aside or sole source award if it is at or below the simplified acquisition threshold. In addition, a CO may award a requirement as a HUBZone contract to a certified HUBZone small business concern at or below the micropurchase threshold.

[69 FR 29425, May 24, 2004, as amended at 84 FR 65248, Nov. 26, 2019]
Exhibit 32



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 10-KSB) of Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. (the Company), we, James G. Graham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and David A. Godwin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge;



(a) the Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b) the
information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-KSB.



|    |  |                         |  |                     
|--- |  | ----------------------- |  | --------------------
|By: |  | /s/ James G. Graham     |  | Date: March 24, 2005
|    |  | James G. Graham         |  |                     
|    |  | President and           |  |                     
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |                     
|    |  |                         |  |                     
|By: |  | /s/ David A. Godwin     |  | Date: March 24, 2005
|    |  | David A. Godwin         |  |                     
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer |  |
Editorial Note on Part 126
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 126.504 When will SBA remove the designation of a concern in DSBS (or successor system) as a certified HUBZone small business concern? ( a ) SBA will remove the designation of a concern in DSBS (or successor system) as a certified HUBZone small business concern if the concern has: ( 1 ) Been decertified as a result of a HUBZone status protest pursuant to § 126.803;
( 2 ) Been decertified as a result of the procedures set forth in § 126.503; or
( 3 ) Voluntarily withdrawn from the HUBZone program pursuant to § 126.501(b).
( b ) SBA will remove the designation of a concern in DSBS (or successor system) as a certified HUBZone small business concern as soon as the D/HUB issues a decision decertifying the concern from the program.
( c ) After a concern has been removed as a certified HUBZone small business concern in DSBS (or successor system), it is ineligible for the HUBZone program and may not submit an offer for a HUBZone contract. ( 1 ) As long as the concern was eligible at the time of its offer (and eligibility relates back to the date of its certification or recertification), it could be awarded a HUBZone contract even if it no longer appears as a certified HUBZone small business concern on DSBS on the date of award.
( 2 ) If SBA determines that the concern's recertification was invalid (*i.e.,* based on a protest or program examination SBA determines that the concern did not qualify as a HUBZone small business concern on the date of its recertification), the concern will be ineligible for the award of any HUBZone contract for which it previously certified its HUBZone status.
[84 FR 65247, Nov. 26, 2019]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBaryogenesis in extended inflation. 2: Baryogenesis via primordial black holesBaryogenesis at the end of extended inflation is studied. Extended inflation is brought to an end by the collisions of bubble walls surrounding regions of true vacuum, a process which produces particles well out of thermal equilibrium. The possibility that the wall collisions may provide a significant density of primordial black holes is considered and their possible role in generating a baryon asymmetry is examined.Document ID19900017419Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBarrow, John D.*(Sussex Univ. Brighton (England)., United States)*Copeland, Edmund J.*(Sussex Univ. Brighton (England)., United States)*Kolb, Edward W.*(Fermi National Accelerator Lab. Batavia, IL., United States)*Liddle, Andrew R.*(Sussex Univ. Brighton, United Kingdom)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Subject CategoryAstrophysicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:182843FERMILAB-PUB-90/98-A-2SUSSEX-AST-90/7-1-2NASA-CR-182843Accession Number90N26735Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-1340Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017419.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

Walnut Creek Field Office

1450 Maria Lane, Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5378

CONTACT: Mark Hammond February 14, 1997

Office: (510) 975-0254 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

RIV-9711

NRC, SUPPLY SYSTEM OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

PERFORMANCE AT WNP-2

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet next week with officials of the

Washington Public Power Supply System to discuss efforts towards improved performance at the

Washington Nuclear Project-2 (WNP-2) outside Richland, Wash.

The meeting will be at 1:30 p.m. on Thursday, Feb. 20, at the Supply System

headquarters, 3000 George Washington Way in Richland. It will be open to the public for

observation; NRC officials will be available after the meeting for questions.

The session is one in a series between Supply System officials and a special NRC

oversight panel created by NRC to monitor and assess the Supply System's efforts to improve

performance at WNP-2.

#