alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Euroopan unionin C 285A/17.

| | ISSN 1725-2490 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 285A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 48. vuosikerta17. marraskuuta 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2490

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 285A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

48. vuosikerta17. marraskuuta 2005

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Tiedotteita |
| | Euroopan henkilöstövalintatoimisto (EPSO) |
| 2005/C 285A/2 | Varallaololuettelo — Avoin kilpailu EPSO/AST/1/04 — Virkailijat (C*1) | 3 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

III   Tiedotteita

Euroopan henkilöstövalintatoimisto (EPSO)

2005/C 285A/2

Varallaololuettelo — Avoin kilpailu EPSO/AST/1/04 — Virkailijat (C*1)

3

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

III Tiedotteita

Euroopan henkilöstövalintatoimisto (EPSO)

| 17.11.2005 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 285/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2005

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 285/3

---

VARALLAOLOLUETTELO (1)

AVOIN KILPAILU EPSO/AST/1/04

VIRKAILIJAT (C*1)

(2005/C 285 A/01)

Konferenssiteknikot

ASCHBERGER Andreas

BARQUILLA GONZÁLEZ Luis Enrique

BUSQUETS PÉREZ Luis Carlos

CAMPAROLAS SAMPIETRO Jorge

DELVAUX Eddy

DEMANET Vincent

DI TRANI Domenico

FALKOWSKI Reinhold Bruno

HERTOGS Roel

HEURCKMANS Edgard

KANKAANPÄÄ Matti

KLEWAIS Johan

KOLLING Andreas

LAUDES Herman

MARTÍNEZ VÁZQUEZ Alberto

MIGACZ Michel

MUNTANE GREGORI Neus

PIRSON Louis

SERRY Luc

VAN CAUTER Jozef

VAN DE CALSEYDE Arnaud

VYNCKE Pieter

Varallaololuetteloiden voimassaoloaika päättyy 31.12.2006; voimassaoloaikaa voidaan pidentää.

---

(1)  Hakijan nimenomaisesta pyynnöstä hänen nimeään ei julkaista.

---
#### Alexander J. Miller v. Elsie S. Miller.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-85,151-04

EX P ARTE RAYMOND ANDREW DEBA, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 08-8-4438-C R IN THE 24 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM G OLIAD COUNTY

Y E A R Y , J . , f

i l e d a d i s s e n t i n g o p i n i o n .

D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N I d i s s e n t f

o r t h e r e a s o n s s t a t e d i n m y d i s s e n t i n g o p i n i o n i n E x p a r t e F o u r n i e r , 4 7 3 S

. W
. 3 d 7 8 9 ( T e x . C r i m . A p p . 2 0 1 5 )

.

F I L E D : S e p t e m b e r 1 4 , 2 0 1 6 D O N O T P U B L I S H
#### William F. Reilly, Respondent, v. William M. Barrett, as President of the Adams Express Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ.
#### § 3162.7 Measurement, disposition, and protection of production.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6167

JERRY L. LINDSEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LIEUTENANT FEICKERT; CAPTAIN BOYLES; SERGEANT DANIELS; SERGEANT QUINN; OFFICER PHILLIPS; OFFICER CARPENTER, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-815-5-BR) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 23, 2001 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry L. Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jerry L. Lindsey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Lindsey v. Feickert , No. CA-00-815-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
KJZ Jul 10, 2020 West Palm Beach

Case 9:20-mj-08242-WM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 1 of 12
Case 9:20-mj-08242-WM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 2 of 12
Case 9:20-mj-08242-WM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 3 of 12
Case 9:20-mj-08242-WM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 4 of 12
Case 9:20-mj-08242-WM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 5 of 12
Case 9:20-mj-08242-WM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 6 of 12
Case 9:20-mj-08242-WM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 7 of 12
Case 9:20-mj-08242-WM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 8 of 12
Case 9:20-mj-08242-WM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 9 of 12
Case 9:20-mj-08242-WM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 10 of 12
Case 9:20-mj-08242-WM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 11 of 12
Case 9:20-mj-08242-WM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 12 of 12
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the use of our reports dated February 26, 2013 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TransAlta Corporation as at December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2012, and internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 of TransAlta Corporation, included as an exhibit to or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 40-F) for 2012.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 

(1)      Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-72454 and No. 333-101470) pertaining to TransAlta Corporation’s Share Option Plan

 

(2)      Registration Statement (Form F-10 No. 333-185157) pertaining to the registration of Debt and Equity Securities of TransAlta Corporation

 

of our reports dated February 26, 2013, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TransAlta Corporation as at December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2012, and internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 of TransAlta Corporation, included as an exhibit to or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 40-F) of TransAlta Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

 
|                   | signed   “Ernst & Young LLP” |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                            |
| Calgary, Alberta       | Chartered   Accountants                         |
| February 26, 2013 |                                            |

 

 

 

----
### **CHAPTER 32—MANUFACTURERS EXCISE TAXES**

Subchapter
Sec. 1
A.
Automotive and related items
4061

B.
Coal
4121
C.
Certain vaccines
4131
D.
Recreational equipment
4161
[E.
Repealed.]
F.
Special provisions applicable to manufacturers tax
4216
G.
Exemptions, registration, etc
4221

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2019**—Pub. L. 116–94, div. N, title I, §501(c) Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3119, struck out item for subchapter E "Medical devices".

**2010**—Pub. L. 111–152, title I, §1405(a)(2), Mar. 30, 2010, 124 Stat. 1065, added item for subchapter E.

**1987**—Pub. L. 100–203, title IX, §9201(c), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–330, added item for subchapter C.

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–227, §2(c), Feb. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 12, added item for subchapter B.

**1965**—Pub. L. 89–44, title II, §§203, 204, 206, June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 139, 140, struck out items for subchapters B, C and E.

1  Section numbers editorially supplied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6266

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JOHN HENRY CONNER, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

.

No. 21
- 6267

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. JOHN HENRY CONNER, JR., Defendant

- Appellant.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Glen E. Conrad , Senior District Judge. ( 7:10

- cr - 00040

- GEC

- 1; 7:20

- cv - 81458

- GEC

- PMS; 7:11

- cr - 00036

- GEC

- 1; 7:20

- cv - 81459

- GEC

- PMS )

Submitted : August 24, 2021 Decided: August 27, 20212 Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. John Henry Conner, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kari Kristina Munro, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, John Henry Conner, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion

. See Whiteside v. United
States , 775 F.3d 180, 182

- 83 (4th Cir. 2014) (en banc) (explaining that § 2255 motions ar e subject to one

- year statute of limitations, running from latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When , as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both t hat the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independ ently reviewed the record and conclude that Conner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal s . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pres ented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 99.2: CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
1350

            In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of Magna-Lab, Inc. for the quarter ended May 31, 2003, the undersigned hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

            (3)   such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May
                  31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (4)   the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
                  10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2003 fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of Magna-Lab, Inc.


      July 11, 2003                               /s/ Kenneth C. Riscica
                                                  ----------------------
                                                  Name: Kenneth C. Riscica
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
§ 3926.10 Conversion of an R, D and D lease to a commercial lease. ( a ) Applications to convert R, D and D leases, including preference right areas, into commercial leases, are subject to the regulations at parts 3900 and 3910, this part, and part 3930, except for lease sale procedures at subparts 3921 and 3924 and § 3922.40.
( b ) A lessee of an R, D and D lease must apply for the conversion of the R, D and D lease to a commercial lease no later than 90 calendar days after the commencement of production in commercial quantities. No specific form of application is required. The application for conversion must be filed in the BLM state office that issued the R, D and D lease. The conversion application must include: ( 1 ) Documentation that there have been commercial quantities of oil shale produced from the lease, including the narrative required by the R, D and D leases;
( 2 ) Documentation that the lessee consulted with state and local officials to develop a plan for mitigating the socioeconomic impacts of commercial development on communities and infrastructure;
( 3 ) A bid payment no less than specified in § 3923.10 and equal to the FMV of the lease; and
( 4 ) Bonding as required by § 3904.14 of this chapter.
( c ) The lessee of an R, D and D lease has the exclusive right to acquire any and all portions of the preference right area designated in the R, D and D lease up to a total of 5,120 acres in the lease. The BLM will approve the conversion application, in whole or in part, if it determines that: ( 1 ) There have been commercial quantities of shale oil produced from the lease;
( 2 ) The bid payment for the lease met FMV;
( 3 ) The lessee consulted with state and local officials to develop a plan for mitigating the socioeconomic impacts of commercial development on communities and infrastructure;
( 4 ) The bond is consistent with § 3904.14 of this chapter; and
( 5 ) Commercial scale operations can be conducted, subject to mitigation measures to be specified in stipulations or regulations, in a manner that complies with applicable law and regulation.
( d ) The commercial lease must contain terms consistent with the regulations in parts 3900 and 3910 of this chapter, this part, and part 3930 of this chapter, and stipulations developed through appropriate NEPA analysis.
----

----

I Informacije

Komisija

----

Menjalni tečaji eura (1)

30. januarja 2006

(2006/C 23/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Vir: referenčni menjalni tečaj, ki ga objavlja ECB.

----

----

Podatki, ki so jih države članice sporočile glede državne pomoči, dodeljene v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 70/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri pomoči za majhna in srednje velika podjetja

(2006/C 23/02)

(Besedilo velja za EGP)

----

----

Predhodna priglasitev koncentracije

(Zadeva št. COMP/M.4108 — T-Systems/Gedas)

(2006/C 23/03)

(Besedilo velja za EGP)

----

(1)UL L 24, 29.1.2004, str. 1.

----

----

Predhodna priglasitev koncentracije

(Zadeva št. COMP/M.4111 — Goldman Sachs/Daiwa/SMBC/Sanyo)

Zadeva, primerna za obravnavo po poenostavljenem postopku

(2006/C 23/04)

(Besedilo velja za EGP)

----

(1)UL L 24, 29.1.2004, str. 1.

(2)UL C 56, 5.3.2005, str. 32.

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO: 20-22715-CIV-UNGARO 

ANDRES GOMEZ, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

VINCE, LLC., 

Defendant. 

------------

STANDING ORDER ON ZOOM AND OTHER VIDEO-CONFERENCE HEARINGS 

THIS CAUSE is before the Court sua sponte. The Court has considered the pertinent 

portions of the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. 

In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Court may, from time to time, conduct hearings 

via Zoom and other similar technologies. The Court hereby instructs the parties and their counsel 

on its standing requirements for such hearings. It is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. Before a Zoom hearing, all counsel must have taken steps to ensure competent

utilization of Zoom, including by completing the following Zoom tutorials:

a. Joining a meeting: https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/201362193-

How-Do-I-Join-A-Meetingb. Testing computer or device audio and video: https://support.zoom.us/hc/enus/articles/201362283-How-Do-I-Join-or-Test-My-Computer-Audio- and 

https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/201362313-How-Do-I-Test-MyVideoCase 1:20-cv-22715-UU Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2020 Page 1 of 3
c. Sharing your screen m a meeting: https://support.zoom.us/hc/enus/articles/201362153-How-Do-I-Share-My-Screend. Sharing multiple screens simultaneously: https://support.zoom.us/hc/enus/articles/115000424286-Sharing-Multiple-Screens-Simultaneously 

2. If the Zoom hearing is an evidentiary hearing, counsel shall ensure that any

testifying parties and witnesses also watch the Zoom tutorials above.

3. In all Zoom and similar video-conferenced hearings, all counsel, parties, and

witnesses must wear headsets with microphones to ensure the highest possible

sound quality.

4. The Court, and all witnesses being questioned about documents, must have access

to all documents that will be used at any hearing conducted with video-conference

technology. To this end, the parties shall:

a. Electronically file on the Court's docket, or conventionally file with the

Court a flash drive containing, all relevant documents in advance of the

hearing; and

b. Meet-and-confer regarding all relevant documents m advance of the

hearing, and either:

i. Ensure that each witness has copies of the relevant documents in

advance of the hearing, or

11. If a Zoom hearing, use the Zoom share function during the

hearing to share copies of the documents. 

5. It is imperative that all Zoom and similar hearings run as smoothly as possible.

Failure to comply with this Order may result in the entry of sanctions, including

Case 1:20-cv-22715-UU Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2020 Page 2 of 3
the exclusion of evidence in the event an exhibit is not readily available to a 

testifying witness. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this / Qay of July, 2020. 

�� URSULA UNGARO 

UDGE 

copies provided: counsel of record 

Case 1:20-cv-22715-UU Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2020 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                 CODE OF ETHICS
            FOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS
                         OF CLOVER LEAF FINANCIAL CORP.

       It is the policy of Clover Leaf Financial Corp. (the "Company") that the
Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") and Chief
Accounting Officer ("CAO") of the Company adhere to and advocate the following
principles governing their professional and ethical conduct in the fulfillment
of their responsibilities:

       1.     Act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent
conflicts between his or her personal, private interests and the interests of
the Company, including receiving improper personal benefits as a result of his
or her position

       2.     Perform responsibilities with a view to causing periodic reports
and other documents filed with the SEC to contain information that is accurate,
complete, fair and understandable.

       3.     Comply with laws of federal, state, and local governments
applicable to the Company, and the rules and regulations of private and public
regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over the Company.

       4.     Act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, and diligence,
without misrepresenting or omitting material facts or allowing independent
judgment to be compromised.

       5.     Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course
of the performance of his or her responsibilities except when authorized or
otherwise legally obligated to disclose. Do not use confidential information
acquired in the course of the performance of his or her responsibilities for
personal advantage.

       6.     Proactively promote ethical behavior among subordinates and peers.

       7.     Use corporate assets and resources employed or entrusted in a
responsible manner.

       8.     Do not use corporate information, corporate assets, corporate
opportunities or one's position with the Company for personal gain. Do not
compete directly or indirectly with the Company.

       9.     Comply in all respects with the Company's Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics.

       10.    Advance the Company's legitimate interests when the opportunity
arises.

       It is also the Policy of the Company that the CEO, CFO and CAO of the
Company acknowledge and certify to the foregoing annually and file a copy of
such certification with the Audit Committee of the Board.

       The Audit Committee of the Board shall have the power to monitor, make
determinations, and recommend action to the Board with respect to violations of
this Policy.
Enclosure 2

STATE REGULATION STATUS

State: Vermont Tracking Ticket Number: 19-26 

Date: 05/10/2019

[The amendment(s) reviewed are identified by an ”*” at the 

beginning of the equivalent NRC requirement.]

RATS ID NRC Chronology Identification Date Due for 

State Adoption

Incoming 

Letter

Outgoing Package Notes

*NA 10 CFR Parts 19, 20, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 

39, 40, 61.551, 61.661, 61.671, 70, 71, and 150

Vermont Radioactive Materials Rule

NA ML17172A627

6/19/2017

Revised 

Proposed

ML17331A820

11/22/2017

Revised 

Proposed

ML18019A066

01/18/2018

Revised 

Proposed

ML18268A249

09/24/2018

Final

ML19102A160

Comments

10/25/2017

ML17172A626

Comments

01/09/2018

ML17331A819

No Comments

02/27/2018

ML18019A050

Comments

10/4/2018

ML18268A243

Comments

05/10/2019

ML19102A130

Vermont submitted regulations that 

incorporate NRC regulations by 

reference.

2018-1 Medical Use of Byproduct Material – Medical Event 

Definitions, Training and Experience, and Clarifying 

Amendments, 10 CFR Parts 30, 32 and 35

01/14/2022 Vermont incorporates Parts 30, 32, and 

35 by reference in their final regulations 

which were effective March 1, 2019. 

Therefore, the regulations in this RATS 

ID have been incorporated by 

reference.

2018-2 Miscellaneous Corrections - 12/21/2021 Vermont incorporates these regulations
2

1 IMPEP review team: Vermont submitted Parts 61.55, 61.56 and 61.57 relating to classification, characterization, and labeling 

 of radioactive waste only; please ensure that Vermont does not have licensees/plans for Part 61 facilities.

Organizational Changes

10 CFR Parts 37, 40. 70 and 71 

by reference in their final regulations 

which were effective March 1, 2019. 

Therefore, the regulations in this RATS 

ID have been incorporated by 

reference.