Name: John M. McManus

Title: Vice President, Environmental Service

Company: Amercian Electric Power

Sign Date: 6/30/2010

Name: Scott W. Banach

Title: Director Project Engineering

Company: Platt Environmental Services, Inc.

Sign Date: 6/25/2010

Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date

Amos 3

Final Test Report 

for

/ /

Based on information and belief formed 

after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the 

statements and information in this test 

report are true, accurate, and complete.

I have reviewed all testing details and 

results in this test report and hereby 

certify that the test report is authentic 

and accurate.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 1 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

Facility Information:

John E. Amos

P.O. Box 4000

Winfield W 25177

Contact: Paul Jackson

Phone: 614-716-3278

Fax: 614-716-1252

Email: pmjackson@aep.com

Testing Company:

Platt Environmental Services, Inc

1520 Kensington Road

Suite 204

Oak Brook IL 60523

Contact: Scott Banach

Phone: 630-521-9400

Fax: 630-521-9494

Email: sbanach@plattenv.com

Air Permit Number:

R30-07900006-2005

Permitted Source ID/Name:

Unit 3 Unit 3

Permitted Maximum Process Rate:

N/A

Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:

N/A

Target Process Test Rate

N/A

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or

 process flow diagram:

Unit 3 is a bituminous coal fired unit rated at 11,936 mmBTU/hr equipped with an SCR, FGD, and precipitator.

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test 

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation 

of request AND approval, including dates.

Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information:

AFS #: FRS #:

SCC / Description 10100202 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous 

Coal - Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Bituminous Coal) 

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location

Round

Duct

Diam.

Distance from 

upstream dist.

Distance from

downstream dist.

Number of

Traverse Ports

Equiv. 

Diam

Min.Travers 

Points

Rect. Duct 

Length /Width

Stack 510.12 0 0 0 1020 4081 4 24

Target

Parameter 

Test

Method

Number of

Test Runs

Test Run

Duration

Sample 

Location Points Comments

Stack Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 0

Stack Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 0

Stack O2 Method 3A O2 3 0

Stack Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 0

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 2 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 3 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location Stack - Method 26A

Average

Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Test Date 5/12/2010 5/12/2010 5/13/2010

Run Start Time 7:50:00 AM 1:50:00 PM 9:10:00 AM

Run Finish Time 11:13:00 AM 5:08:00 PM 12:29:00 PM

Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 121.567 121.496 126.476 123.180

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 14.20 14.15 14.55 14.300

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 14.17 13.98 14.99 14.380

Carbon Dioxide, % 12.2 11.9 12.1 12.067

Oxygen, % 7.3 7.2 6.9 7.133

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 126.25 125.75 128.46 126.820

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3,228,114.8 3,253,287.2 3,335,184.1 3,272,195.36

7

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 4,335,372.4 4,355,810.2 4,498,875.0 4,396,685.86

7

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.3 99.4 101.0 100.233

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 5/12/2010 5/12/2010 5/12/2010

Run Start Time 7:53:00 AM 9:53:00 

AM

1:50:00 PM

Run Finish Time 9:52:00 AM 11:13:00 

AM

3:49:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 12.2 12.2 11.9 12.100

Oxygen, % 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.267

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3227072 3227072 3254532 3,236,225.33

3

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Moisture, % 14.2 14.2 14 14.133

Fuel Type Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 4 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 5/12/2010 5/12/2010 5/12/2010

Run Start Time 7:53:00 AM 9:53:00 

AM

1:50:00 PM

Run Finish Time 9:52:00 AM 11:13:00 

AM

3:49:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 12.2 12.2 11.9 12.100

Oxygen, % 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.267

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3227072 3227072 3254532 3,236,225.33

3

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Moisture, % 14.2 14.2 14 14.133

Fuel Type Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 5 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

Emissions Summary

Process Run Data

Location: Stack - Method 26A

Compound: Hydrogen Chloride

Average

RunNumber M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Mass_mg 1.2 0.94 1.4 1.180

lb/mmBtuO2 3.27E-04 2.54E-04 3.56E-04 0.000

Compound: Hydrogen Fluoride

Average

RunNumber M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Mass_mg 0.31 0.26 0.31 0.293

lb/mmBtuO2 8.45E-05 7.04E-05 7.89E-05 0.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 6 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

Process Run Data

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 Bituminous Coal Burned 734 kilo pound/ hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

750

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 7 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

1 Gross Load 962 MW The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1300

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 8 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

1 Steam Temperature 999 F The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 9 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

1 Steam Pressure 2482 psig The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

2500

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 10 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

1 Opacity 3.5 % The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

10

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 11 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

2 Bituminous Coal Burned 734 kilo pound/ hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

750

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 12 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

2 Gross Load 962 MW The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1300

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 13 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

2 Steam Temperature 999 F The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 14 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

2 Steam Pressure 2482 psig The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

2500

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 15 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

2 Opacity 3.5 % The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

10

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 16 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

3 Bituminous Coal Burned 963 kilo pound/ hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

750

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 17 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

3 Gross Load 1242 MW The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1300

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 18 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

3 Steam Temperature 1005 F The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 19 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

3 Steam Pressure 3262 psig The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

2500

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 20 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data

3 Opacity 7.97 % The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

10

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH 

EFFICIENCY

3.5 % 10

2 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH 

EFFICIENCY

3.5 % 10

3 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH 

EFFICIENCY

3.5 % 10

1 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION) 0.04 lb/mmBTU 0.04

2 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION) 0.04 lb/mmBTU 0.04

3 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION) 0.04 lb/mmBTU 0.04

1 SCRUBBER 22 ppm 23

2 SCRUBBER 22 ppm 23

3 SCRUBBER 22 ppm 23

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 21 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 22 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location Stack - Method 26A

Average

Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Test Date 5/12/2010 5/12/2010 5/13/2010

Run Start Time 7:50:00 AM 1:50:00 PM 9:10:00 AM

Run Finish Time 11:13:00 AM 5:08:00 PM 12:29:00 PM

Net Traversing Points 28 28 28

Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180

Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.233 0.233 0.233 0.233

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.995 0.995 0.995 0.995

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.85 28.85 28.97 28.890

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.55 1.57 1.67 1.597

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 134.347 133.830 138.928 135.702

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 102.04 100.23 101.13 101.133

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 121.567 121.496 126.476 123.180

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 427.4 425.5 457.7 436.867

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 20.12 20.03 21.54 20.563

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 14.20 14.15 14.55 14.300

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 14.17 13.98 14.99 14.380

Dry Mole Fraction 0.8583 0.8602 0.8545 0.858

Carbon Dioxide, % 12.2 11.9 12.1 12.067

Oxygen, % 7.3 7.2 6.9 7.133

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.5 80.9 81 80.800

Fuel Factor 1.11 1.15 1.16

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.24 30.19 30.21 30.213

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.51 28.52 28.43 28.487

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.4 -0.4 -0.5 -0.433

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.82 28.82 28.93 28.857

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 126.25 125.75 128.46 126.820

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.7043222778

82858

0.711918079

946035

0.756323509

525023

0.724

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 50.91 51.15 52.83 51.630

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 1,419.293 1,419.293 1,419.293 1,419.293

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3,228,114.8 3,253,287.2 3,335,184.1 3,272,195.3

67

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 4,335,372.4 4,355,810.2 4,498,875.0 4,396,685.8

67

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.3 99.4 101.0 100.233

Percent Excess Air, % 52.3 50.9 47.6 50.267

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Round Duct Diameter, inches 510.12 510.12 510.12

Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0

Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 23 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 5/12/2010 5/12/2010 5/12/2010

Run Start Time 7:53:00 AM 9:53:00 AM 1:50:00 PM

Run Finish Time 9:52:00 AM 11:13:00 AM 3:49:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 12.2 12.2 11.9 12.100

Oxygen, % 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.267

Fuel Factor 1.11 1.11 1.15

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3227072 3227072 3254532 3,236,225.3

33

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Moisture, % 14.2 14.2 14 14.133

Analyzer Make ServoMex ServoMex ServoMex

Analyzer Model 01440D1 01440D1 01440D1 14,400.000

Analyzer Serial Number 3790 3790 3790 3,790.000

Operating Range 20 20 20 20.000

Operating Units % % %

No. Readings/Avg. 119 80 119 106.000

Calibration Set 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID CC266906-

CO2

CC266906-

CO2

CC266906-

CO2

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.030

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID CC287521-

CO2

CC287521-

CO2

CC287521-

CO2

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 9.86 9.88 9.88 9.873

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias 0 0.1 0.1 0.067

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID CC266906-

CO2

CC266906-

CO2

CC266906-

CO2

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response -0.03 -0.03 0.01 -0.017

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0.2 0.067

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0 0 0.2 0.067

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID CC287521-

CO2

CC287521-

CO2

CC287521-

CO2

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 9.88 9.88 9.91 9.890

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias 0.1 0.1 0.25 0.150

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.1 0 0.15 0.083

Cavg 12.1 12.2 11.8 12.033

Cavg Units %vd %vd %vd

Cgas 12.0479 12.135 11.7242 11.969

Cgas Units %vd %vd %vd

Fuel Type Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000

Cgasw Units

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 24 of 24
Amos 3

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 5/12/2010 5/12/2010 5/12/2010

Run Start Time 7:53:00 AM 9:53:00 AM 1:50:00 PM

Run Finish Time 9:52:00 AM 11:13:00 AM 3:49:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 12.2 12.2 11.9 12.100

Oxygen, % 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.267

Fuel Factor 1.11 1.11 1.15

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 3227072 3227072 3254532 3,236,225.3

33

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Moisture, % 14.2 14.2 14 14.133

Analyzer Make ServoMex ServoMex ServoMex

Analyzer Model 01440D1 01440D1 01440D1 14,400.000

Analyzer Serial Number 3790 3790 3790 3,790.000

Operating Range 25 25 25 25.000

Operating Units % % %

No. Readings/Avg. 119 80 119 106.000

Calibration Set 1 1 1 1.000

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID CC287521-O2 CC287521-

O2

CC287521-

O2

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response -0.03 -0.05 -0.05 -0.043

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 -0.08 -0.08 -0.053

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID CC266906-O2 CC266906-

O2

CC266906-

O2

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 12.42 12.62 12.62 12.553

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias 0 0.8 0.8 0.533

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID CC287521-O2 CC287521-

O2

CC287521-

O2

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response -0.05 -0.05 0 -0.033

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias -0.08 -0.08 0.12 -0.013

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0.08 0 0.2 0.093

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID CC266906-O2 CC266906-

O2

CC266906-

O2

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 12.62 12.62 12.5 12.580

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias 0.8 0.8 0.32 0.640

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.8 0 0.48 0.427

Cavg 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.267

Cavg Units %vd %vd %vd

Cgas 7.2699 7.2166 7.1418 7.209

Cgas Units %vd %vd %vd

Fuel Type Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Coal - 

Bituminous

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000

Cgasw Units

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 25 of 24