alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

*CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of MedicalCV, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB forthe annual period ended April 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jules L. Fisher,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                                       theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated: | July 29, 2003 | By     | /s/ Jules L. Fisher     |
|--------|--------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |               |   | Jules L. Fisher         |
|   |               |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 $! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 %! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 &! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 '! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 (! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 )! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 $! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 %! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 &! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 '! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 (! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 ! )! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 ! !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 ! "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 ! #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 ! $! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 ! %! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 ! &! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 ! '! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 ! (! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 " )! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 " !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 " "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 " #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 " $! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 " %! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 " &! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 " '! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 " (! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 # )! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 # !! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 # "! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 # #! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 # $! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 # %! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 # &! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 # '! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 # (! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 $ )! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 $

2 3 , * ( ) 3 2 3 0

4 0 3 5 ,

4 6 7 3 8 ) 9 3 ) 8 0 8 0

: 9 3 ) 8! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 $ !

7 3 ' 6 ; < 3 =

> & ? @ = A = > ? B C D A = @ D E A ? F ? A A G B = > & A G D G > > = A C C H I > G D C D H

> & J ! # J G A K L ? @ I = > = > L
> ? B C D & E G M E L L C E G K & > G G N H C L ? C O

O = L ? > F C D = M G! " # $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / , 0 ( , ) - #

. $ # 1 $ "

+ , 4 ,

P I ' , * 3 1 #
#### Celia E. English, as Administratrix, v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Qlarke and Seott, JJ.
Exhibit
10.1





 


FOMO
CORP.


Code
of Ethics and Professional Conduct


 


1.
 Be patient and courteous.


 


2.
Be inclusive. We welcome and support people of all backgrounds and identities. This includes but is not limited to members
of any sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, race, ethnicity, culture, national origin, social and economic class,
educational level, color, immigration status, sex, age, size, family status, political belief, religion, and mental and physical
ability.


 


3.
Be considerate. We all depend on each other to produce the best work we can as a company.


 


Your
decisions will affect clients and colleagues, and you should take those consequences into account when making decisions.


 


4.
Be respectful. We will not all agree all the time, but disagreement is no excuse for disrespectful behavior. We will all
experience frustration from time to time, but we cannot allow that frustration to become personal attacks. An environment
where people feel uncomfortable or threatened is not a productive or creative one.


 


5.
Choose your words carefully. Always conduct yourself professionally. Be kind to others. Do not insult or put down others.
Harassment and exclusionary behavior are not acceptable. This includes, but is not limited to:


 


-
Threats of violence.


 


-
Discriminatory jokes and language.


 


-
Sharing sexually explicit or violent material via electronic devices or other means.


 


-
Personal insults, especially those using racist or sexist terms. - Unwelcome sexual attention.


 


-
Advocating for, or encouraging, any of the above behavior.


 


6.
Repeated harassment of others. In general, if someone asks you to stop something, then stop.








 


When
we disagree, try to understand why. Differences of opinion and disagreements are mostly unavoidable. What is important is that
we resolve disagreements and differing views constructively.


 


7.
Our differences can be our strengths. We can find strength in diversity. Different people have different perspectives on
issues, and that can be valuable for solving problems or generating new ideas. Being unable to understand why someone holds a
viewpoint does not mean that they are wrong. Do not forget that we all make mistakes, and blaming each other does not get us
anywhere. Instead, focus on resolving issues and learning from mistakes.
### part 3—funding
### §2918b. Transferred

Section, Pub. L. 111–117, div. D, title I, (2)(E), Dec. 16, 2009, 123 Stat. 3227, which related to re-enrollment in alternative school by high-school dropouts, was transferred to section 3226a of this title.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-044 March 14, 2000

NRC EXTENDS COMMENT PERIOD ON DRAFT REVIEW PLAN

FOR MIXED OXIDE FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has extended until March 27 the public comment period

on its draft plan for the review of a possible future application for a mixed oxide (MOX) fuel

fabrication facility. The original due date for comments was March 13.

The Department of Energy has announced its plans to construct a MOX fuel plant at its

Savannah River site in South Carolina to convert surplus weapons-grade plutonium into fuel to power

commercial nuclear reactors. Commercial nuclear power plants in the United States currently use

uranium as fuel; the mixed oxide fuel would be a combination of uranium and plutonium.

The Standard Review Plan defines standards and criteria that the NRC would use in reviewing

an application to decide if there is reasonable assurance that a MOX fuel fabrication facility will be

constructed and operated in a manner that will provide reasonable protection of the health and safety of

workers, the public and the environment and that will not be inimical to the common defense and

security.

A copy of the draft "Standard Review Plan for the Review of an Application for a Mixed Oxide

(MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility" (NUREG-1718) is available by writing to the U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Distribution Services, Washington, DC 20555-0001. A copy is also available

on the NRC's website at http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/NUREGS/SR1718/index.html

Comments should be submitted to the Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001. Comments may also be submitted

electronically by selecting the "comments" link on the above website.

##
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5143 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the assignment of patient 

advocates at medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2022 

Ms. STABENOW introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the 

assignment of patient advocates at medical facilities of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Patient Advo5 cacy Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PATIENT ADVOCATES AT MEDICAL FACILITIES OF 

7 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7309A of title 38, United 

9 States Code, is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5143 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as 

2 subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the fol4 lowing new subsection (e): 

5 ‘‘(e) NUMBER OF PATIENT ADVOCATES.—Beginning 

6 on the date that is one year after the date of the enact7 ment of the Veterans Patient Advocacy Act, the Director 

8 shall ensure that— 

9 ‘‘(1) there is not fewer than one patient advo10 cate for every 13,500 veterans enrolled in the system 

11 of annual patient enrollment of the Department es12 tablished and operated under section 1705(a) of this 

13 title; and 

14 ‘‘(2) highly rural veterans may access the serv15 ices of patient advocates, including, to the extent 

16 practicable, by assigning patient advocates to rural 

17 community-based outpatient clinics.’’. 

18 (b) GAO REPORT.—Not later than two years after 

19 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller 

20 General of the United States shall submit to the Com21 mittee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the Com22 mittee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representa23 tives a report evaluating the implementation by the Sec24 retary of Veterans Affairs of subsection (e) of section 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5143 IS

1 7309A of title 38, United States Code, as added by sub2 section (a)(2). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Thomas C. Duffy, Respondent, against Arthur I. Levine et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Brewster, Deyo, Santry and Bergan, JJ. [See *post,*p. 867.]
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

101 Marietta Street, N.W.

Suite 2900

Atlanta, GA 30323

No: II-97-15 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Monday, February 10,

1997)

Telephone: (404) 331-5503 or 331-7878

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE

WITH GEORGIA POWER COMPANY TO DISCUSS CONCERNS AT VOGTLE

Conference Will Be Open To Observation By The Public

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a

predecisional enforcement conference with Georgia Power company on

March 10 in Atlanta to discuss agency concerns related to the

operating condition of a Unit 1 emergency safety injection system

at the Vogtle nuclear power plant, located near Waynesboro,

Georgia.

The purpose of the conference is to discuss an apparent

violation regarding the operating status of a thermal overload

protection device on a valve associated with a safety injection

pump. NRC officials said the system in question is used to inject

water into the reactor vessel during a postulated emergency

involving a medium break loss of coolant accident (LOCA). The

device is used to prevent damage to the valve motor during

operational testing due to a malfunction. The NRC requires

licensees to ensure that the device will be bypassed during an

actual emergency, even if the valve motor overheats, so that water

flow will continue into the reactor. The device was found not to

be in the bypass mode during a recent NRC inspection.

The enforcement conference will be held from 10:30 a.m.

until 12:30 p.m. in the NRC offices at 101 Marietta Street, N. W.,

Suite 2900. The conference is open to observation by the public

and the media, and NRC officials will be available at its

conclusion to answer questions from interested observers.

NRC officials said the decision to hold an enforcement

conference does not mean that a determination has been made that a

violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken.

The purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes, and

safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to

point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection

report; and to enable the company to outline its proposed

corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated
enforcement action, such as a civil penalty, will be made at the

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later time.

#
§ 130.420 Renewal applications. ( a ) The recipient organization will submit the renewal application to the OSBDC using the submission process outlined in the annual notice of funding opportunity.
( b ) If the OSBDC chooses to not renew the award of an existing recipient organization or the recipient organization elects not to reapply, the OSBDC will award a cooperative agreement for the conduct of an SBDC project to a new recipient organization in the same area of service using a competitive process. If the OSBDC has initiated a non-renewal or termination action, the Agency will not issue the new award until all administrative remedies have been exhausted. For further information regarding the termination and non-renewal procedures, see § 130.700.
( c ) Significant factors considered in the renewal application review will include: ( 1 ) The applicant's ability to obtain matching funds;
( 2 ) The quality of prior performance under the cooperative agreement as measured by client satisfaction rate;
( 3 ) The results of any examination conducted pursuant to § 130.810(b);
( 4 ) Corrective measures implemented as a result of examinations conducted; and
( 5 ) The accreditation provisions of § 130.810(c) including any conditions, the most current accreditation report, and corrective measures implemented, affecting the recipient organization and the SBDC network.
( d ) The OSBDC will review the renewal application for conformity with the notice of funding opportunity. The AA/SBDC may request additional information and documentation prior to issuing the cooperative agreement.
[88 FR 76645, Nov. 7, 2023]
#### Dorothea Folser, Appellant, v. Samuel Brown, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 541 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 541

 To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected 
   State and local governments before making an expenditure from the 
   Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                March 2 (legislative day, March 1), 2021

 Ms. Cortez Masto (for herself and Ms. Rosen) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected 
   State and local governments before making an expenditure from the 
   Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Waste Informed Consent 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act, the terms ``affected Indian tribe'', ``affected unit 
of local government'', ``high-level radioactive waste'', 
``repository'', ``Secretary'', ``spent nuclear fuel'', and ``unit of 
general local government'' have the meanings given the terms in section 
2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101).

SEC. 3. CONSENT-BASED APPROVAL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may not make an expenditure from the 
Nuclear Waste Fund established under section 302(c) of the Nuclear 
Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10222(c)) for the costs of the 
activities described in paragraphs (4) and (5) of section 302(d) of 
that Act (42 U.S.C. 10222(d)) unless the Secretary has entered into an 
agreement for a repository with--
            (1) the Governor of the State in which the repository is 
        proposed to be located;
            (2) each affected unit of local government;
            (3) any unit of general local government contiguous to the 
        affected unit of local government if spent nuclear fuel or 
        high-level radioactive waste will be transported through that 
        unit of general local government for disposal at the 
        repository; and
            (4) each affected Indian tribe.
    (b) Conditions on Agreement.--Any agreement for a repository under 
this Act--
            (1) shall be in writing and signed by all parties;
            (2) shall be binding on the parties; and
            (3) shall not be amended or revoked except by mutual 
        agreement of the parties.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.101
 (AHCCCS LOGO)
    
    ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION
DIVISION OF BUSINESS AND FINANCE
SECTION A: CONTRACT
 1. AMENDMENT NUMBER:
    
    2. CONTRACT NO.:
    
    3. EFFECTIVE DATE OF
AMENDMENT:
    
    4. PROGRAM15
    
    YH09-0001-07
    
    October 1, 2010
    
    DHCM - ACUTE
  VHS Phoenix Health Plan, LLC
7878 16th St. Suite, 105
Phoenix, AZ 85020
       Mark Held
 Sr. Procurement Specialist AHCCCSContracts and Purchasingand Linda Barry at Linda.Barry@azahcccs.gov
   9. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE:
    
    10. SIGNATURE OF AHCCCSA CONTRACTING OFFICER:/s/ Nancy Novick
    
    /s/ Michael VeitTYPED NAME: NANCY NOVICK
    
    TYPED NAME: MICHAEL VEITTITLE: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    
    TITLE: CONTRACTS & PURCHASING ADMINISITRATORDATE: 5/2/11
    
    DATE: APR 29 2011




---



##### 



Supplemental Payment Related To:
 TANF
    
    
    TANF
    
    
    SSI
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    TotalSupplemental Payment:
    
    <1, M/F
    
    
    14-44, F
    
    
    w/o Med
    
    
    Non-MED
    
    
    MED
    
    
    Payment4 Apache/Coconinc/Mohave/Navajo
    
    $
    195,320.93
    
    
    $
    458,538.53
    
    
    $
    149,817.60
    
    
    $
    555,190.33
    
    
    $
    112,994.77
    
    
    $
    1,471,861.166 Yavapal
    
    $
    116,670.70
    
    
    $
    410,589.54
    
    
    $
    266,745.98
    
    
    $
    686,296.05
    
    
    $
    171,828.04
    
    
    $
    1,652,330.318 Gllo/Pinal
    
    $
    57,037.46
    
    
    $
    193,370.20
    
    
    $
    245,893.13
    
    
    $
    312,846.37
    
    
    $
    75,275.75
    
    
    $
    884,424.91$
    4,008,616.38
  Phoenix Health Plan
    
    PaymentBenson Hospital
    
    $
    Carondelet Holy Cross
    
    $
    Cobre Valley Community Hospital
    
    $
    292,691.53Copper Queen Community Hospital
    
    $
    Huralapai Mountain Medicare Center
    
    $
    108,685.35La Paz Regional Hospital
    
    $
    72,000.77Little Colorado Medical Center
    
    $
    269,324.64Mount Graham Regional Medical Center
    
    $
    Northern Cochise Community Hospital
    
    $
    Page Hospital
    
    $
    107,414.48Payson Regional Medical Center
    
    $
    689,638.28Sierre Vista Regional Health
    
    $
    Southeastern Az Medical Center
    
    $
    Summit Healthcare Regional Medical Center
    
    $
    446,873.09Valley View Medical Center
    
    $
    311,050.97Verde Valley Medical Center
    
    $
    1,353,961.99White Mountain Regional Medical Center
    
    $
    14,028.18Wickenburg Regional Health Center
    
    $
    26,153.86YRMC East
    
    $
    236,620.91Total Payments
    
    $
    3,928,444.05Premium Tax
    
    $
    80,172.33Total with Premium Tax
    
    $
    4,008,616.38
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPerformance analysis of local area networksA simulation of the TCP/IP protocol running on a CSMA/CD data link layer was described. The simulation was implemented using the simula language, and object oriented discrete event language. It allows the user to set the number of stations at run time, as well as some station parameters. Those parameters are the interrupt time and the dma transfer rate for each station. In addition, the user may configure the network at run time with stations of differing characteristics. Two types are available, and the parameters of both types are read from input files at run time. The parameters include the dma transfer rate, interrupt time, data rate, average message size, maximum frame size and the average interarrival time of messages per station. The information collected for the network is the throughput and the mean delay per packet. For each station, the number of messages attempted as well as the number of messages successfully transmitted is collected in addition to the throughput and mean packet delay per station.Document ID19900015451Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsAlkhatib, Hasan S.*(Santa Clara Univ. CA, United States)*Hall, Mary Grace*(Santa Clara Univ. CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 9, 1990Subject CategoryComputer SystemsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186639NAS 1.26:186639Accession Number90N24767Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-554Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900015451.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024