alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-164 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(August 4, 1999)

NRC POSTS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PERFORMANCE DATA ON INTERNET WEBSITE;

SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON PILOT PLANT PROGRAM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is now posting to its Internet website detailed

information on the performance of all nine nuclear power plants participating in a pilot

evaluation of the revised reactor oversight process. The NRC is seeking public comments on

the pilot program.

Information will periodically be posted in charts and tables to the NRC Internet website

at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html

The website will contain data supplied by NRC nuclear power plant licensees, as well as

an analysis and evaluation by NRC inspectors and staff, and information on other aspects of

the revised oversight process.

Among the information listed will be data on any unplanned reactor shutdowns,

unplanned events that result in changes in reactor power, effluent releases in excess of NRC

regulatory requirements, the availability of plant security systems, the readiness of the plant

emergency response organization - all key indicators of the safety and performance of nuclear

plants. Information explaining the revised oversight process, a list of scheduled public meetings

and a glossary of terms also will be posted.

The information is being released as part of an NRC initiative to provide more timely and

detailed information on nuclear plant performance.

The NRC is also seeking public comment on the pilot program, which is implementing

significant revisions to processes for overseeing the safety performance of nuclear power

plants. The pilot program was described in a previous NRC press release issued on July 7.

The request for comment is discussed in a notice published July 26 in The Federal Register.

The comment period runs until November 30. Written comments can be submitted by

mail to the Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of

Administration, Mail Stop T-6 D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.

20555-0001. Comments can be hand-delivered to the NRC at 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville,

Md., weekdays between 7:45 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. Electronic comments can be submitted at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/COMMISSION/INITIATIVES/1999/COMMENTS/ 2a _cmt.html

##
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

138790 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138790 

 COA: 281381 

Wayne CC: 07-009031 

JOVAN DAMAR LAROCK, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 5, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-125 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, June 15, 1999)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received four reports from its Advisory

Committee on Reactor Safeguards following the Committee’s meetings April 7-10 and May 5-8.

The reports provide comments on:

ˇ The role of defense in depth in a risk-informed regulatory system;

ˇ The safety aspects of the Baltimore Gas and Electric Company’s license renewal

application for the Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant, Units 1 and 2 (interim letter);

ˇ Modifications proposed by the Westinghouse Owners Group to the core damage

assessment guidelines and post accident sampling system requirements;

ˇ Proposed resolution of generic safety issue-165, spring-actuated safety and relief valve

reliability.

Copies of the reports are available through the NRC’s Office of Public Affairs, the NRC’s

homepage (http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW) and the Public Document Room.

###
Filed 6/26/08 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2008 ND 124

John Patrick Murphy, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20070375

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Georgia Dawson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Mark Anthony Beauchene, P.O. Box 1680, Fargo, N.D. 58107-1680, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Kara Schmitz Olson, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Murphy v. State

No. 20070375

Per Curiam.

[¶1]John Murphy appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for post- conviction relief.  Murphy argues the district court abused its discretion by denying the petition, which is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.

[¶2]We affirm the order under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) because the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the petition.

[¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.48 N 77.37 W Meters AGL
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier ALCAZAR-OLIVAREZ, also known as Pedro Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40701.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Javier Alcazar-Olivarez (Alcazar) pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation and was sentenced to 18 months of imprisonment and a two-year term of supervised release.

*188Alcazar argues for the first time on appeal that the district court erred in ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release and that this condition should therefore be vacated. This claim is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it is not ripe for review. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662).

Also for the first time on appeal, Alcazar challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Alcazar contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Alcazar properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
§ 206.223 General work eligibility. ( a ) *General.* To be eligible for financial assistance, an item of work must: ( 1 ) Be required as the result of the emergency or major disaster event;
( 2 ) Be located within the designated area of a major disaster or emergency declaration, except that sheltering and evacuation activities may be located outside the designated area; and
( 3 ) Be the legal responsibility of an eligible applicant.
( b ) *Private nonprofit facilities.* To be eligible, all private nonprofit facilities must be owned and operated by an organization meeting the definition of a private nonprofit organization [see § 206.221(f)].
( c ) *Public entities.* Facilities belonging to a public entity may be eligible for assistance when the application is submitted through the State or a political subdivision of the State.
( d ) *Facilities serving a rural community or unincorporated town or village.* To be eligible for assistance, a facility not owned by an eligible applicant, as defined in § 206.222, must be owned by a private nonprofit organization; and provide an essential governmental service to the general public. Applications for these facilities must be submitted through a State or political subdivision of the State.
( e ) *Negligence.* No assistance will be provided to an applicant for damages caused by its own negligence. If negligence by another party results in damages, assistance may be provided, but will be conditioned on agreement by the applicant to cooperate with FEMA in all efforts necessary to recover the cost of such assistance from the negligent party.
[55 FR 2307, Jan. 23, 1990, as amended at 71 FR 40027, July 14, 2006; 74 FR 60214, Nov. 20, 2009]
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateRisk Assessment

# Contact Us About Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Regulation

If you need to report a safety concern, please do not use this page. Instead, please see Report a Safety or Security Concern.

Would you like to remain anonymous?:*

YesNo

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Concepts of Risk
          - Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA)
          - History of Risk-Informed Regulation Programs
          - Current Risk-Informed Activities
          - Contact Us
          - Related Information
          - Risk-Informed Activities Technical Guidance Program 

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020
EXHIBIT 118 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-119 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 1 of

9
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-119 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 2 of

9
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-119 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 3 of

9
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-119 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 4 of

9
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-119 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 5 of

9
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-119 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 6 of

9
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-119 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 7 of

9
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-119 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 8 of

9
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-119 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 9 of

9
### §2714. Investment of proceeds of attached property

When the property attached is sold on an interlocutory order or is producing revenue, the money arising from the sale or revenue shall be invested, under the order of the court, in securities of the United States. The accretions therefrom are subject to the order of the court.

(Added Pub. L. 86–682, §9, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 707.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was derived from R.S. §928, which was originally classified to section 741 of former Title 28. Following the general revision and enactment of Title 28 by act June 25, 1948, R.S. §928 was reclassified to section 841 of Title 39. R.S. §928 was repealed by section 12(c) of Pub. L. 86–682 (section 1 of which revised and enacted Title 39), and reenacted by section 9 thereof as section 2714 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Sept. 1, 1960, see section 11 of Pub. L. 86–682, 74 Stat. 708.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, being the ChiefFinancial Officer of TEPPCO GP, Inc., the sole general partner of TE ProductsPipeline Company, Limited Partnership (the “Company”), hereby certifies that,to his knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual periodended December 31, 2004, filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

This written statement is beingfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form10-K.  A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to TE Products PipelineCompany, Limited Partnership and will be retained by TE Products PipelineCompany, Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 
| March 2, 2005                                |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date                                              |
|                                              |
|                                              |
| /s/ CHARLES H. LEONARD                            |   |
| Charles H. Leonard                                |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| TEPPCO GP, Inc., General Partner                  |

 

----
8040.5 ~AA-2-0l0-0'''tJ

09/29106

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization

National Business Aircraft Association

Regional Airline Association

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association

ATA

ATA

Person Contacted

Eli Cotli

Dave Lottcrcr

Robert Hackman

Craig Fabian

M LOJlez

Date Response
#### Margaret A. Behrman et al., Respondents, v. Westchester Electric Railroad Company, Appellant.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00591

- CV

In the Interest of C.N.L. and C.T.F., Children
On Appeal from the 267th District Court of De Witt County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 22

- 11

- 25,863

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consi dered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. No c osts are assessed due to appellant ’ s inability to pay costs.
We further order this decisi on certified bel ow for observance. April 2 5 , 2024
#### In the Matter of the Application for Appointment of a Committee of the Person and Property of Anna Kaltman, an Alleged Incompetent Person. Anna Kaltman, Alleged Incompetent Person, and Jacob Goldberg, Petitioner, Appellants; Meyer Alterman, as Special Guardian, Respondent.

Fo opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10138.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10138.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31720]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2010-0036]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: U.S. Beneficiary Certificate and Agreement EIB 92-37.

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Our customers will be able to submit 
this form on paper or electronically.
    This form is used when the beneficiary of the letter of credit, the 
recipient of a funding under a direct buyer credit loan, or the 
recipient of payment under a reimbursement loan or a payment under a 
supplier credit is not the exporter. If the need to use this form 
arises, the insured holds it in the event of a claim, at which time it 
would submit it to Export-Import Bank along with all other claim 
documentation. The form provides Export-Import Bank staff with the 
information necessary to make a determination of the eligibility of the 
claimed export transaction for coverage.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before January 18, 2011 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted through http://www.regulations.gov 
or mailed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20038 attn: OMB 3048-0022.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 92-37 U.S. Beneficiary Certificate and 
Agreement.
    OMB Number: 3048-0022.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: If the need to use this form arises, the insured 
holds it in the event of a claim, at which time it would submit it to 
Export-Import Bank along with all other claim documentation.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 10.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 1 hour.
    Government Annual Burden Hours: 2.5 hours.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Once.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-31720 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
### Subpart A—Distilled Spirits

Sec.
5001.
Imposition, rate, and attachment of tax.
5002.
Definitions.
5003.
Cross references to exemptions, etc.
5004.
Lien for tax.
5005.
Persons liable for tax.
5006.
Determination of tax.
5007.
Collection of tax on distilled spirits.
5008.
Abatement, remission, refund, and allowance for loss or destruction of distilled spirits.
[5009.
Repealed.]
5010.
Credit for wine content and for flavors content.
5011.
Income tax credit for average cost of carrying excise tax.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subpart A, comprising sections 5001 to 5012, related to tax on distilled spirits, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, 201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.

#### Amendments

**2005**—Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11126(c), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1958, added item 5011.

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–598, §6(b), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3489, added item 5010.

**1979**—Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(b)(2), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 290, struck out item 5009 "Drawback".
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5310 

To ensure that mental and behavioral health education and training grants 

awarded under section 756(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act may 

be used for training to increase skills and capacity to meet the needs 

of children and adolescents who have experienced trauma. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20, 2022 

Ms. ROSEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To ensure that mental and behavioral health education and 

training grants awarded under section 756(a)(4) of the 

Public Health Service Act may be used for training to 

increase skills and capacity to meet the needs of children 

and adolescents who have experienced trauma. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Kids Through 

5 Trauma Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5310 IS

1 SEC. 2. USE OF GRADUATE PSYCHOLOGY EDUCATION PRO2 GRAM FUNDS. 

3 Section 756(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 294e–1(a)(4)) is amended by inserting ‘‘, in5 cluding training to increase skills and capacity to meet the 

6 needs of children and adolescents who have experienced 

7 trauma’’ before the period at the end. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders 

ARAMARK Corporation: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-53163-99, 333-75870, 333-89118, 333-89120, 333-89122, 333-89124, 333-89126, 333-103517, 333-115950, 333-124927, 333-124929, and 333-127513) on Form S-8 and the registration statement (No. 333-85050) on Form S-3 ofARAMARK Corporation and subsidiaries of our reports dated December 5, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of ARAMARK Corporation and subsidiaries as of October 1, 2004 and September 30, 2005, and the relatedconsolidated statements of income, cash flows, and shareholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2005, the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005, which reports appear in the September 30, 2005, annual report on Form 10-Kof ARAMARK Corporation.