Facility _Information facility _id utility

_code legal_owner_nam e

legl_operator_name

legal_address_type

legal_address

legal_city legal_state legal_zip 50931 50931 Yellowstone Energy Lim ited Partnership Rosebud Operating Services, Inc.

legal owner1087 West River Street, Ste 200 Boise ID 83702

Page 1Facility _Information plant_nam e

physical_address

phyical_city

physical_state

physical_zip

mailing_address

mailing_city

mailing_state

mailing_zip Yellowstone Energy

LP 2215 N. Frontage Road

Billings MT 59101-7303 2215 N. Frontage Road

Billings MT 59101-7303

Page 2Facility _Information RFA_small_entity

ff_fired_coal

ff_fired_oil ff_fired_ngas ff_fired_petcoke

ff_fired_other

ff_permitted_coal

ff_permitted_oil

ff_permitted_ngas Yes FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE

Page 3Facility _Information ff_permitted_petcoke

ff_permitted_other

deviation_reporting

continuous_emissions

cem_provided

facility _note FALSE TRUE YELP shall prom ptly report deviations from permit requirements, including those attributable to upset conditions as defined in the permit, the probable cause of such deviations, and any corrective actions or preventive measures taken. To be considered prompt, deviations shall be reported as part of the routine reporting requirements under ARM 17.8.1212(3)(b) and, if applicable, in accordance with the malfunction reporting requirements under ARM 17.8.110, unless otherwise specified in an applicable requirement. No General Notes:The ICR runtime file was converted to a database file during input of the data. File was converted back into a runtime file for uploading into the ICR database with the assistance of Mr. Jeff Cole.1. Yellowstone Energy Lim ited Partnership (YELP) combusts petroleum coke and coker gas as its primary fuels. Of these two fuels, approximately 95% of the boiler heat input comes from petroleum coke while the remaining 5% of heat input comes from coker gas. Coker gas is provided to the YELP facility from the adjacent ExxonMobil refinery. The coker gas is combusted for destruction purposes to reduce SO2 emissions that would otherwise be emitted without treatment. Coker gas consists of carbon dioxide (~12% by volum e), carbon monoxide (~5% by volum e), oxygen (~1% by volum e), nitrogen (~80% by volum e), and methane (~1% by volum e), with trace amounts of sulfur dioxide and water. Of the contents of coker gas, only methane and carbon monoxide contribute any usable heat value (~6% by total volum e of the

Page 4Facility _Information General Notes:The ICR runtime file was converted to a database file during input of the data. File was converted back into a runtime file for uploading into the ICR database with the assistance of Mr. Jeff Cole.1. Yellowstone Energy Lim ited Partnership (YELP) combusts petroleum coke and coker gas as its primary fuels. Of these two fuels, approximately 95% of the boiler heat input comes from petroleum coke while the remaining 5% of heat input comes from coker gas. Coker gas is provided to the YELP facility from the adjacent ExxonMobil refinery. The coker gas is combusted for destruction purposes to reduce SO2 emissions that would otherwise be emitted without treatment. Coker gas consists of carbon dioxide (~12% by volum e), carbon monoxide (~5% by volum e), oxygen (~1% by volum e), nitrogen (~80% by volum e), and methane (~1% by volum e), with trace amounts of sulfur dioxide and water. Of the contents of coker gas, only methane and carbon monoxide contribute any usable heat value (~6% by total volum e of the

Page 5Facility _Information General Notes:The ICR runtime file was converted to a database file during input of the data. File was converted back into a runtime file for uploading into the ICR database with the assistance of Mr. Jeff Cole.1. Yellowstone Energy Lim ited Partnership (YELP) combusts petroleum coke and coker gas as its primary fuels. Of these two fuels, approximately 95% of the boiler heat input comes from petroleum coke while the remaining 5% of heat input comes from coker gas. Coker gas is provided to the YELP facility from the adjacent ExxonMobil refinery. The coker gas is combusted for destruction purposes to reduce SO2 emissions that would otherwise be emitted without treatment. Coker gas consists of carbon dioxide (~12% by volum e), carbon monoxide (~5% by volum e), oxygen (~1% by volum e), nitrogen (~80% by volum e), and methane (~1% by volum e), with trace amounts of sulfur dioxide and water. Of the contents of coker gas, only methane and carbon monoxide contribute any usable heat value (~6% by total volum e of the

Page 6Facility _Information General Notes:The ICR runtime file was converted to a database file during input of the data. File was converted back into a runtime file for uploading into the ICR database with the assistance of Mr. Jeff Cole.1. Yellowstone Energy Lim ited Partnership (YELP) combusts petroleum coke and coker gas as its primary fuels. Of these two fuels, approximately 95% of the boiler heat input comes from petroleum coke while the remaining 5% of heat input comes from coker gas. Coker gas is provided to the YELP facility from the adjacent ExxonMobil refinery. The coker gas is combusted for destruction purposes to reduce SO2 emissions that would otherwise be emitted without treatment. Coker gas consists of carbon dioxide (~12% by volum e), carbon monoxide (~5% by volum e), oxygen (~1% by volum e), nitrogen (~80% by volum e), and methane (~1% by volum e), with trace amounts of sulfur dioxide and water. Of the contents of coker gas, only methane and carbon monoxide contribute any usable heat value (~6% by total volum e of the

Page 7Facility _Information General Notes:The ICR runtime file was converted to a database file during input of the data. File was converted back into a runtime file for uploading into the ICR database with the assistance of Mr. Jeff Cole.1. Yellowstone Energy Lim ited Partnership (YELP) combusts petroleum coke and coker gas as its primary fuels. Of these two fuels, approximately 95% of the boiler heat input comes from petroleum coke while the remaining 5% of heat input comes from coker gas. Coker gas is provided to the YELP facility from the adjacent ExxonMobil refinery. The coker gas is combusted for destruction purposes to reduce SO2 emissions that would otherwise be emitted without treatment. Coker gas consists of carbon dioxide (~12% by volum e), carbon monoxide (~5% by volum e), oxygen (~1% by volum e), nitrogen (~80% by volum e), and methane (~1% by volum e), with trace amounts of sulfur dioxide and water. Of the contents of coker gas, only methane and carbon monoxide contribute any usable heat value (~6% by total volum e of the

Page 8Facility _Information General Notes:The ICR runtime file was converted to a database file during input of the data. File was converted back into a runtime file for uploading into the ICR database with the assistance of Mr. Jeff Cole.1. Yellowstone Energy Lim ited Partnership (YELP) combusts petroleum coke and coker gas as its primary fuels. Of these two fuels, approximately 95% of the boiler heat input comes from petroleum coke while the remaining 5% of heat input comes from coker gas. Coker gas is provided to the YELP facility from the adjacent ExxonMobil refinery. The coker gas is combusted for destruction purposes to reduce SO2 emissions that would otherwise be emitted without treatment. Coker gas consists of carbon dioxide (~12% by volum e), carbon monoxide (~5% by volum e), oxygen (~1% by volum e), nitrogen (~80% by volum e), and methane (~1% by volum e), with trace amounts of sulfur dioxide and water. Of the contents of coker gas, only methane and carbon monoxide contribute any usable heat value (~6% by total volum e of the

Page 9Facility _Information General Notes:The ICR runtime file was converted to a database file during input of the data. File was converted back into a runtime file for uploading into the ICR database with the assistance of Mr. Jeff Cole.1. Yellowstone Energy Lim ited Partnership (YELP) combusts petroleum coke and coker gas as its primary fuels. Of these two fuels, approximately 95% of the boiler heat input comes from petroleum coke while the remaining 5% of heat input comes from coker gas. Coker gas is provided to the YELP facility from the adjacent ExxonMobil refinery. The coker gas is combusted for destruction purposes to reduce SO2 emissions that would otherwise be emitted without treatment. Coker gas consists of carbon dioxide (~12% by volum e), carbon monoxide (~5% by volum e), oxygen (~1% by volum e), nitrogen (~80% by volum e), and methane (~1% by volum e), with trace amounts of sulfur dioxide and water. Of the contents of coker gas, only methane and carbon monoxide contribute any usable heat value (~6% by total volum e of the

Page 10Facility _Information General Notes:The ICR runtime file was converted to a database file during input of the data. File was converted back into a runtime file for uploading into the ICR database with the assistance of Mr. Jeff Cole.1. Yellowstone Energy Lim ited Partnership (YELP) combusts petroleum coke and coker gas as its primary fuels. Of these two fuels, approximately 95% of the boiler heat input comes from petroleum coke while the remaining 5% of heat input comes from coker gas. Coker gas is provided to the YELP facility from the adjacent ExxonMobil refinery. The coker gas is combusted for destruction purposes to reduce SO2 emissions that would otherwise be emitted without treatment. Coker gas consists of carbon dioxide (~12% by volum e), carbon monoxide (~5% by volum e), oxygen (~1% by volum e), nitrogen (~80% by volum e), and methane (~1% by volum e), with trace amounts of sulfur dioxide and water. Of the contents of coker gas, only methane and carbon monoxide contribute any usable heat value (~6% by total volum e of the

Page 11Facility _Information General Notes:The ICR runtime file was converted to a database file during input of the data. File was converted back into a runtime file for uploading into the ICR database with the assistance of Mr. Jeff Cole.1. Yellowstone Energy Lim ited Partnership (YELP) combusts petroleum coke and coker gas as its primary fuels. Of these two fuels, approximately 95% of the boiler heat input comes from petroleum coke while the remaining 5% of heat input comes from coker gas. Coker gas is provided to the YELP facility from the adjacent ExxonMobil refinery. The coker gas is combusted for destruction purposes to reduce SO2 emissions that would otherwise be emitted without treatment. Coker gas consists of carbon dioxide (~12% by volum e), carbon monoxide (~5% by volum e), oxygen (~1% by volum e), nitrogen (~80% by volum e), and methane (~1% by volum e), with trace amounts of sulfur dioxide and water. Of the contents of coker gas, only methane and carbon monoxide contribute any usable heat value (~6% by total volum e of the

Page 12Facility _Information General Notes:The ICR runtime file was converted to a database file during input of the data. File was converted back into a runtime file for uploading into the ICR database with the assistance of Mr. Jeff Cole.1. Yellowstone Energy Lim ited Partnership (YELP) combusts petroleum coke and coker gas as its primary fuels. Of these two fuels, approximately 95% of the boiler heat input comes from petroleum coke while the remaining 5% of heat input comes from coker gas. Coker gas is provided to the YELP facility from the adjacent ExxonMobil refinery. The coker gas is combusted for destruction purposes to reduce SO2 emissions that would otherwise be emitted without treatment. Coker gas consists of carbon dioxide (~12% by volum e), carbon monoxide (~5% by volum e), oxygen (~1% by volum e), nitrogen (~80% by volum e), and methane (~1% by volum e), with trace amounts of sulfur dioxide and water. Of the contents of coker gas, only methane and carbon monoxide contribute any usable heat value (~6% by total volum e of the

Page 13Facility _Information General Notes:The ICR runtime file was converted to a database file during input of the data. File was converted back into a runtime file for uploading into the ICR database with the assistance of Mr. Jeff Cole.1. Yellowstone Energy Lim ited Partnership (YELP) combusts petroleum coke and coker gas as its primary fuels. Of these two fuels, approximately 95% of the boiler heat input comes from petroleum coke while the remaining 5% of heat input comes from coker gas. Coker gas is provided to the YELP facility from the adjacent ExxonMobil refinery. The coker gas is combusted for destruction purposes to reduce SO2 emissions that would otherwise be emitted without treatment. Coker gas consists of carbon dioxide (~12% by volum e), carbon monoxide (~5% by volum e), oxygen (~1% by volum e), nitrogen (~80% by volum e), and methane (~1% by volum e), with trace amounts of sulfur dioxide and water. Of the contents of coker gas, only methane and carbon monoxide contribute any usable heat value (~6% by total volum e of the

Page 14facility _contacts facility _id contact_id contact_title contact_name

contact_phone1

contact_phone2

contact_email

contact_primary 50931 4 Engineer Scott Siddoway 2083443570 scott.siddoway@rosi-boise.com TRUE 50931 6 Consultant Hal Robbins 4064425768 hrobbins@bison-eng.com FALSE 50931 7 Plant Engineer Bruce Stevenson

4062565296107 BStevenson@rosipower.com FALSE

Page 15facility _coal_utilized facility _id coal_type percentage_mass percentage_btu

synfuel_type

coal_note 50931 petroleum coke 100 100 YELP is perm itted to burn both petroleum coke and coker gas. The majority of the heat input (~95%) comes from petroleum coke, while aproximatley 5% comes from coker gas.

Page 16facility _coal_utilized YELP is perm itted to burn both petroleum coke and coker gas. The majority of the heat input (~95%) comes from petroleum coke, while aproximatley 5% comes from coker gas.

Page 17facility _coal_utilized YELP is perm itted to burn both petroleum coke and coker gas. The majority of the heat input (~95%) comes from petroleum coke, while aproximatley 5% comes from coker gas.

Page 18facility _oil_utilized facility _id oil_type percentage_volume percentage_btu

other_type 50931 No.2 Fuel Oil (distillate) 100 100

Page 19facility _other_materials facility _id other_material

permitted_burn

actually _burn other_quantity

other_quantity

_units other_note rcra_utilize rcra_explain 50931 cat slurry

oil TRUE FALSE 0 tons/year YELP is perm itted to burn cat slurry oil per their permit. However, they have not installed the necessary equipm ent to burn cat slurry oil and, consequently, has never burned cat slurry oil since the plant began operation. Yes This material is not a solid waste. YELP is permitted to burn cat slurry oil but has never installed the necessary equipm ent to do so. YELP has never burned cat slurry oil since the facility

began operation. 50931 coker gas TRUE TRUE 600000 tons/year This material is not a solid waste. YELP is permitted to burn coker gas which it recieves from ExxonMobil. The purpose of burning the coker gas is for SO2 destruction purposes and it does not have a high heating value (300 -600 btu/lb). Yes This material is not a solid waste. YELP is permitted to burn coker gas which it recieves from ExxonMobil. The purpose of burning the coker gas is for SO2 destruction purposes and it does not have a high heating value (300 -600 btu/lb).

Page 20facility _other_materials rcra_explain This material is not a solid waste. YELP is permitted to burn cat slurry oil but has never installed the necessary equipm ent to do so. YELP has never burned cat slurry oil since the facility

began operation. This material is not a solid waste. YELP is permitted to burn coker gas which it recieves from ExxonMobil. The purpose of burning the coker gas is for SO2 destruction purposes and it does not have a high heating value (300 -600 btu/lb).

Page 21facility _other_materials This material is not a solid waste. YELP is permitted to burn cat slurry oil but has never installed the necessary equipm ent to do so. YELP has never burned cat slurry oil since the facility

began operation. This material is not a solid waste. YELP is permitted to burn coker gas which it recieves from ExxonMobil. The purpose of burning the coker gas is for SO2 destruction purposes and it does not have a high heating value (300 -600 btu/lb).

Page 22facility _other_materials
This material is not a solid waste. YELP is permitted to burn coker gas which it recieves from ExxonMobil. The purpose of burning the coker gas is for SO2 destruction purposes and it does not have a high heating value (300 -600 btu/lb).

Page 23boiler_information

facility _id boiler_id boiler_type boiler_other bottom_design

design_fuelheat_input max_heat_input MWe_capacity 50931 GEN1 Fluidized bed firing Dry Bottom petroleum coke 871 1036 60

Page 24boiler_information

MWe_net_capacity

design_gross_efficiency

operating_gross_efficiency

design_pressure

operating_pressure

design_temp

operating_temp

design_reheat_multiple

design_reheat_temp1 50 86 80.7 1575 1386 955 950 FALSE

Page 25boiler_information

design_reheat_temp2

operating_reheat_multiple

operating_reheat_temp1

operating_reheat_temp2

hours_operated

vg_capacity

_factor applicable_NSPS

retirement_year

retirement_year_CBI FALSE 8256 92.4 Subpart Da(1) FALSE

Page 26boiler_information

NOx_control

SO2_control

combustion_additives No Yes No

Page 27boiler_fuels

facility _id boiler_id fuel_type fuel_year percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 50931 GEN1 oil - distillate 2007 0.07 0.31 50931 GEN1 oil - distillate 2008 0.06 0.21 50931 GEN1 oil - distillate 2009 0.07 0.26 50931 GEN1 other fossil fuel (specify) 2007 70.56 4.91 coker gas 50931 GEN1 other fossil fuel (specify) 2008 64.94 4.03 coker gas 50931 GEN1 other fossil fuel (specify) 2009 66.19 3.37 coker gas 50931 GEN1 petroleum coke 2007 29.37 94.78 50931 GEN1 petroleum coke 2008 35 95.76 50931 GEN1 petroleum coke 2009 33.74 96.37

Page 28boiler_control_NOx

facility _id boiler_id NOx_type NOx_other NOx_online

Page 29boiler_control_SO2

facility _id boiler_id SO2_type SO2_other SO2_online 50931 GEN1 Lim estone injection to fluidized bed-fired furnace 7/1/1995

Page 30boiler_additives

facility _id boiler_id boiler_additive additive_other

additive_online

Page 31facility _units facility _id unit_id 50931 50931

Page 32unit_boilers

facility _id unit_id boiler_id 50931 50931 GEN1

Page 33facility _controls facility _id control_id control_group control_type

control_other

legacy _control cntrol_online

control_offline

NOx_reagent 50931 Baghouse PM control Fabric Filter, pulse FALSE 7/1/1995

Page 34facility _controls reagent_other

NOx_ammonia

SO2_sorbent

oher_sorbent

SO2_scrubber_additive

Page 35facility _sampling_ports facility _id sampling_port_id 50931 sample_ports-1

Page 36facility _stacks facility _id stack_id stack_height stack_diameter

sack_gas_velocity 50931 Main Stack 199 8 135

Page 37configurations

facility _id configuration_id 50931 Config1

Page 38configuration_components

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

order component_type port_near 50931 Config1 50931 1 Unit 50931 Config1 Baghouse 2 PM control 50931 Config1 Main Stack 4 Stack 50931 Config1 sample_ports-1 3 Sam pling Port next

Page 39configuration_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

pollutant_nam e

permit_type_1

em lim it_1 em lim it_units_1 avg_period_1

em lim it_2 em lim it_units_2 50931 Config1 PM (Filterable) PSD and Title V (state-issued; federally enforceable) 18.26 pound per hour (lb/hr)

stack test 0.03 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 50931 Config1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) PSD and Title V (state-issued; federally enforceable) 680 pound per hour (lb/hr)

1 hour 2040 pounds per 3-hours 50931 Config1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) PSD and Title V (state-issued; federally enforceable) 120.6 pound per hour (lb/hr)

1 hour 2898.6 pounds per day 50931 Config1 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) PSD and Title V (state-issued; federally enforceable) 319 pound per hour (lb/hr)

30 days 1396 tons per year (tons/yr)

Page 40configuration_pollutants1

avg_period_2

em lim it_3 em lim it_units_3 avg_period_3

em lim it_4 em lim it_units_4 avg_period_4

em lim it_details

test_method stack test 438.4 pounds per day stck test 80 tons per year (tons/yr) stack test This facility

has a number of Particulate Matter limits. See the overal note. Method 5 3 hours 620 pound per hour (lb/hr) 30 days 16320 pounds per day 24 hours This facility

has a number of SO2 emission limits. See the overall note. The permit specifies 8.16 tons/day which was converted to 16,320 lb/day for purposes of this submittal. 24 hours 529 tons per year (tons/yr) annual See overall note for emission limits in permit. annual 0.4 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 30 days See overall note for emission limits in permit.

Page 41configuration_pollutants1

em rate em rate_units guarantee_level

_explain

req_monitoring

eq_recordkeeping

req_reporting 18.26 pound per hour (lb/hr)

No Vendor(s) guranteed that the permitted emission rate would be met. Stack testing (Method 19 and Method 5 as specified in 40 CFR 60, Subpart Da)

ARM 17.8, Subchapter 12, Operating Permit Program §1212(2)&(3): 1. Unless otherwise provided in this permit, the permittee shall maintain compliance monitoring records that include the following information:a. The date, place as defined in the permit, and time of sampling or measurement;b. The date(s) analyses were performed;c. The company or entity that performed the analyses;d. The analy tical techniques or methods used;e. The results of such analyses; andf.The operating conditions at the time of sampling or measurement2. The permittee shall retain records of all required monitoring data and support information for a period of at least 5 years from the date of the monitoring sample, measurement, report, or application. Support information includes all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip-chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, and copies of all reports required bythe permit. All monitoring data, support information, and required reports and summari Quarterly

and semi-annualy
. 680 pound per hour (lb/hr)

No Vendor(s) guranteed that the permitted emission rate would be met. CEMs, RATA, and Method 6/6c, Analy ze weight percent Sulfur and heating value (Btu/lb) of petroleum Coke; analyze coker gas stream when boilers are operating ARM 17.8, Subchapter 12, Operating Permit Program §1212(2)&(3): 1. Unless otherwise provided in this permit, the permittee shall maintain compliance monitoring records that include the following information:a. The date, place as defined in the permit, and time of sampling or measurement;b. The date(s) analyses were performed;c. The company or entity that performed the analyses;d. The analy tical techniques or methods used;e. The results of such analyses; andf.The operating conditions at the time of sampling or measurement2. The permittee shall retain records of all required monitoring data and support information for a period of at least 5 years from the date of the monitoring sample, measurement, report, or application. Support information includes all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip-chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, and copies of all reports required bythe permit. All monitoring data, support information, and required reports and summari Quarterly

and semi-annualy
. 120.6 pound per hour (lb/hr)

No Vendor(s) guranteed that the permitted emission rate would be met. CEMs and Method 3/3B

ARM 17.8, Subchapter 12, Operating Permit Program §1212(2)&(3): 1. Unless otherwise provided in this permit, the permittee shall maintain compliance monitoring records that include the following information:a. The date, place as defined in the permit, and time of sampling or measurement;b. The date(s) analyses were performed;c. The company or entity that performed the analyses;d. The analy tical techniques or methods used;e. The results of such analyses; andf.The operating conditions at the time of sampling or measurement2. The permittee shall retain records of all required monitoring data and support information for a period of at least 5 years from the date of the monitoring sample, measurement, report, or application. Support information includes all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip-chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, and copies of all reports required bythe permit. All monitoring data, support information, and required reports and summari Quarterly

and semi-annualy
. 319 pound per hour (lb/hr)

No Vendor(s) guranteed that the permitted emission rate would be met. CEMs, RATA, and Method 7/7E

ARM 17.8, Subchapter 12, Operating Permit Program §1212(2)&(3): 1. Unless otherwise provided in this permit, the permittee shall maintain compliance monitoring records that include the following information:a. The date, place as defined in the permit, and time of sampling or measurement;b. The date(s) analyses were performed;c. The company or entity that performed the analyses;d. The analy tical techniques or methods used;e. The results of such analyses; andf.The operating conditions at the time of sampling or measurement2. The permittee shall retain records of all required monitoring data and support information for a period of at least 5 years from the date of the monitoring sample, measurement, report, or application. Support information includes all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip-chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, and copies of all reports required bythe permit. All monitoring data, support information, and required reports and summari Quarterly

and semi-annualy
.

Page 42control_technologies

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id project_titleproject_type vendor_name

vndor_contact

vendor_phone

Page 43control_technologies

vendor_address

vndor_city

vendor_state

vendor_zip actual_start_date projected_start_date

end_date sorbent chemical_additive

Page 44control_technologies

injection_point

HAP_em ission_reduction

HAP_em ission_rate

HAP_em ission_rate_units

HAP_achieved_reduction

HAP_achieved_rate

HAP_achieved_rate_units

feed_rate feed_rate_units

Page 45control_technologies feed_rate_units

Page 46control_coal_ranks

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id coal_type

Page 47control_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id pollutant_nam e

Page 48control_costs

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id boiler_retrofit boiler_new_install

total_capital_investm ent

total_operating_costs

base_year

Page 49control_costs

CBI

Page 50misc_controls

facility _id misc_control_id

control_description

Page 51misc_control_configurations

facility _id misc_control_id

configuration_id

Page 52fuel_shipments

facility _id shipment_id

shipment_date

amount_received

amount_units

fuel_type state_country other_country

county 50931 01_2009 1/1/2009 26454 short tons (2000 lbs) pet coke MT MT - Yellowstone 50931 02_2009 2/1/2009 22771 short tons (2000 lbs) pet coke MT MT - Yellowstone 50931 03_2009 3/1/2009 20811 short tons (2000 lbs) pet coke MT MT - Yellowstone 50931 04_2009 4/1/2009 22436 short tons (2000 lbs) pet coke MT MT - Yellowstone 50931 05_2009 5/1/2009 19875 short tons (2000 lbs) pet coke MT MT - Yellowstone 50931 06_2009 6/1/2009 21913 short tons (2000 lbs) pet coke MT MT - Yellowstone 50931 07_2009 7/1/2009 22858 short tons (2000 lbs) pet coke MT MT - Yellowstone 50931 08_2009 8/1/2009 18401 short tons (2000 lbs) pet coke MT MT - Yellowstone 50931 09_2009 9/1/2009 21266 short tons (2000 lbs) pet coke MT MT - Yellowstone 50931 10_2009 10/1/2009 25156 short tons (2000 lbs) pet coke MT MT - Yellowstone 50931 11_2009 11/1/2009 14959 short tons (2000 lbs) pet coke MT MT - Yellowstone 50931 12_2009 12/1/2009 23812 short tons (2000 lbs) pet coke MT MT - Yellowstone

Page 53fuel_shipments

coal_seam shipment_method MT - Yellowstone Unit Train MT - Yellowstone Unit Train MT - Yellowstone Unit Train MT - Yellowstone Unit Train MT - Yellowstone Unit Train MT - Yellowstone Unit Train MT - Yellowstone Unit Train MT - Yellowstone Unit Train MT - Yellowstone Unit Train MT - Yellowstone Unit Train MT - Yellowstone Unit Train MT - Yellowstone Unit Train

Page 54fuel_shipment_configurations

facility _id shipment_id

configuration_id 50931 01_2009 Config1 50931 02_2009 Config1 50931 03_2009 Config1 50931 04_2009 Config1 50931 05_2009 Config1 50931 06_2009 Config1 50931 07_2009 Config1 50931 08_2009 Config1 50931 09_2009 Config1 50931 10_2009 Config1 50931 11_2009 Config1 50931 12_2009 Config1

Page 55fuel_shipment_samples

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id amount_fuel amount_fuel_units

total_sulfur ash_content heating_value

hating_units

Page 56fuel_shipment_samples

chlorine chlorine_units fluorine fluorine_units data_provided

data_other_specified

supplier_type

supplier_name

supplier_address

Page 57fuel_shipment_samples

supplier_city

supplier_state

supplier_zip

lab_nam e lab_address lab_city lab_state lab_zip analysis_copies

Page 58fuel_shipment_samples analysis_copies

Page 59fuel_sample_pollutants

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id fuel_pollutant pollutant_conc

pollutant_conc_units

pollutant_conc_ND

pollutant_conc_MDL

Page 60test_reports

facility _id report_id report_type other_type report_description report_begin_date

report_end_date

before_control

during_deviation 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

compliance SO2, NOx, PM, PM10, and CO testing. Particulate emission testing occurred during a period of baghouse malfunction. The baghouse issues were corrected and the unit was successfully retested on 3/28/05. 2/15/2005 2/17/2005 No Yes 50931 2/15/06 to 2/16/06 Emission Testing.

compliance SO2, NOx, PM, PM10, and CO testing. 2/15/2006 2/16/2006 No No 50931 2/5/07 to 2/7/07 Emission Testing

compliance SO2, NOx, PM, PM10, and CO testing. 2/5/2007 2/5/2007 No No 50931 3/16/09 to 3/18/09 testing

compliance SO2, NOx, PM, PM10, and CO testing. 3/16/2009 3/18/2009 No No 50931 3/24/08 to 3/26/08 Testing

compliance SO2, NOx, PM, PM10, and CO testing. 3/24/2008 3/26/2008 No No 50931 3/28/2005 Particulate Retest

compliance Restesting of Main Stack for Particulate Compliance Test. 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 No No

Page 61test_reports

deviation_reports No No No No No No

Page 62test_report_configurations

facility _id report_id configuration_id 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

Config1 50931 2/15/06 to 2/16/06 Emission Testing.

Config1 50931 2/5/07 to 2/7/07 Emission Testing

Config1 50931 3/16/09 to 3/18/09 testing

Config1 50931 3/24/08 to 3/26/08 Testing

Config1 50931 3/28/2005 Particulate Retest

Config1

Page 63test_report_fuels

facility _id report_id fuel_id 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

2005 Fuel Test 50931 2/15/06 to 2/16/06 Emission Testing.

2006 Fuel Test 50931 2/5/07 to 2/7/07 Emission Testing

2007 Fuel Test 50931 3/16/09 to 3/18/09 testing

2009 Fuel Test 50931 3/24/08 to 3/26/08 Testing

2008 Fuel Test 50931 3/28/2005 Particulate Retest

2005 Fuel Test b

Page 64test_report_fuel_types

facility _id report_id fuel_id fuel_type percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

2005 Fuel Test

oil - distillate 0 0 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

2005 Fuel Test

other fossil fuel (specify)

68 4 coker gas 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

2005 Fuel Test

petroleum coke 32 96 50931 2/15/06 to 2/16/06 Emission Testing.

2006 Fuel Test

oil - distillate 0 0 50931 2/15/06 to 2/16/06 Emission Testing.

2006 Fuel Test

other fossil fuel (specify)

67 4 coker gas 50931 2/15/06 to 2/16/06 Emission Testing.

2006 Fuel Test

petroleum coke 33 96 50931 2/5/07 to 2/7/07 Emission Testing

2007 Fuel Test

oil - distillate 0 0 50931 2/5/07 to 2/7/07 Emission Testing

2007 Fuel Test

other fossil fuel (specify)

71 5 coker gas 50931 2/5/07 to 2/7/07 Emission Testing

2007 Fuel Test

petroleum coke 29 95 50931 3/16/09 to 3/18/09 testing

2009 Fuel Test

oil - distillate 0 0 50931 3/16/09 to 3/18/09 testing

2009 Fuel Test

other fossil fuel (specify)

64 3 coker gas 50931 3/16/09 to 3/18/09 testing

2009 Fuel Test

petroleum coke 36 97 50931 3/24/08 to 3/26/08 Testing

2008 Fuel Test

oil - distillate 0 0 50931 3/24/08 to 3/26/08 Testing

2008 Fuel Test

other fossil fuel (specify)

65 4 coker gas 50931 3/24/08 to 3/26/08 Testing

2008 Fuel Test

petroleum coke 35 96 50931 3/28/2005 Particulate Retest

2005 Fuel Test b

oil - distillate 0 0 50931 3/28/2005 Particulate Retest

2005 Fuel Test b

other fossil fuel (specify)

69 4 coker gas 50931 3/28/2005 Particulate Retest

2005 Fuel Test b

petroleum coke 31 96

Page 65cem_data

facility _id tim e_period

cem_period_description

Page 66cem_data_pollutants1

facility _id tim e_period

pollutant_nam e

Page 67test_report_sampling

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id point_differ point_description befre_SO2_device

point_orientation

normal_bypass_percent

testing_bypass_percent 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

sample_ports-1

No No 50931 2/15/06 to 2/16/06 Emission Testing.

sample_ports-1

No No 50931 2/5/07 to 2/7/07 Emission Testing

sample_ports-1

No No 50931 3/16/09 to 3/18/09 testing

sample_ports-1

No No 50931 3/24/08 to 3/26/08 Testing

sample_ports-1

No No 50931 3/28/2005 Particulate Retest

sample_ports-1

No No

Page 68test_report_sampling

fg_fraction

Page 69sampling_runs

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id start_datetime end_datetim e

unit_load net_generation fg_moisture_content 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

sample_ports-1

1 2/16/2005 2/16/2005 63.14 54.35 7.65 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

sample_ports-1

2 2/17/2005 2/17/2005 63.11 54.21 7.61 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

sample_ports-1

3 2/15/2005 2/15/2005 62.97 54.17 7.4 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

sample_ports-1

4 2/14/2005 2/14/2005 63.06 54.26 6.96 50931 2/15/06 to 2/16/06 Emission Testing.

sample_ports-1

1 2/14/2006 2/14/2006 67.82 59.02 7.1 50931 2/15/06 to 2/16/06 Emission Testing.

sample_ports-1

2 2/15/2006 2/15/2006 67.94 59.13 7.1 50931 2/15/06 to 2/16/06 Emission Testing.

sample_ports-1

3 2/16/2006 2/16/2006 67.34 58.54 7.1 50931 2/5/07 to 2/7/07 Emission Testing

sample_ports-1

1 2/5/2007 2/5/2007 64.09 55.29 7.1 50931 2/5/07 to 2/7/07 Emission Testing

sample_ports-1

2 2/6/2007 2/6/2007 65.55 56.75 7.1 50931 2/5/07 to 2/7/07 Emission Testing

sample_ports-1

3 2/7/2007 2/7/2007 62.06 53.26 7.03 50931 3/16/09 to 3/18/09 testing

sample_ports-1

1 3/16/2009 3/16/2009 67.68 58.88 7.25 50931 3/16/09 to 3/18/09 testing

sample_ports-1

2 3/17/2009 3/17/2009 66.28 57.48 6.89 50931 3/16/09 to 3/18/09 testing

sample_ports-1

3 3/18/2009 3/18/2009 66.69 57.89 7.99 50931 3/24/08 to 3/26/08 Testing

sample_ports-1

1 3/24/2008 3/24/2008 65.88 57.08 7.23 50931 3/24/08 to 3/26/08 Testing

sample_ports-1

2 3/25/2008 3/25/2008 65.74 56.94 7.1 50931 3/24/08 to 3/26/08 Testing

sample_ports-1

3 3/26/2008 3/26/2008 65.38 56.58 7.1 50931 3/28/2005 Particulate Retest

sample_ports-1

1 3/28/2005 3/28/2005 61.99 53.19 7.24

Page 70sampling_runs

fg_flow_rate

fg_flow_rate_units

standard_temperature

standard_pressure

normal_temperature

normal_pressure

fg_oxygen_content

fg_CO2_content

fg_temperature 237407.4 dscfm 68 1 4.8 14.4 1 236616 dscfm 68 1 4.3 15 1 238531.8 dscfm 68 1 4.5 14.7 1 235583 dscfm 68 1 4.6 14.8 1 221531.3 dscfm 68 1 3 16.4 1 223404 dscfm 68 1 4.1 16 1 233333.3 dscfm 68 1 4.1 16 1 217900.7 dscfm 68 1 4.4 15.3 1 217026.6 dscfm 68 1 4.3 15.5 1 216876 dscfm 68 1 4.5 15.3 1 233542.3 dscfm 68 1 4.4 15.3 1 245965.5 dscfm 68 1 5.9 15.2 1 243334 dscfm 68 1 5.6 15.3 1 235298.1 dscfm 68 1 4.7 13.3 1 244485.7 dscfm 68 1 5.1 13.3 1 243940 dscfm 68 1 5.2 13.3 1 240293.6 dscfm 68 1 5.1 14.2 1

Page 71sampling_runs

fg_pressure

Hg_loi test_method run_comments

fuel_id fuel_unit_load fuel_flow_rate

fuel_ash fuel_heating_value 0.882349 Method 5 2005 Fuel Test 63.14 65677 0.14 14473 0.882115 Method 201a 2005 Fuel Test 63.11 65973 0.14 14473 0.88245 Method 10 and Method 6/6c 2005 Fuel Test 62.97 65570 0.14 14473 0.877837 Method 29 2005 Fuel Test 63.06 65562 0.14 14473 0.882316 Method 10 and Method 6/6c 2006 Fuel Test 67.82 66126 0.68 14832 0.88 Method 5 2006 Fuel Test 67.94 66273 0.68 14832 0.88 Method 201a 2006 Fuel Test 67.34 66063 0.68 14832 0.885524 Method 10 and Method 6/6c 2007 Fuel Test 64.09 61552 0.42 14664 0.884622 Method 5 2007 Fuel Test 65.55 64235 0.42 14664 0.88265 Method 201a 2007 Fuel Test 62.06 60493 0.42 14664 0.879709 Method 10 and Method 6/6c 2009 Fuel Test 67.68 62378 0.25 14844 0.885123 Method 5 2009 Fuel Test 66.28 62509 0.25 14844 0.889802 Method 201a 2009 Fuel Test 66.69 66190 0.25 14844 0.880545 Method 10 and Method 6/6c 2008 Fuel Test 65.88 66526 0.39 14677 0.882349 Method 5 2008 Fuel Test 65.74 66433 0.39 14677 0.882516 Method 201a 2008 Fuel Test 65.38 66546 0.39 14677 0.882149 Method 5 2005 Fuel Test b 61.99 65472 0.41 14483

Page 72sampling_runs

fuel_sulfur 6.58 6.58 6.58 6.58 6.06 6.06 6.06 6.72 6.72 6.72 6 6 6 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.47

Page 73sampling_run_pollutants1

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id pollutant_nam e conc conc_units conc_ND conc_MDL 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

sample_ports-1

1 PM (Filterable) FALSE 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

sample_ports-1

2 PM10 (Filterable) FALSE 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

sample_ports-1

3 Carbon Monoxide (CO) FALSE 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

sample_ports-1

4 Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE 50931 2/15/05 to 2/17/05 testing

sample_ports-1

3 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) FALSE 50931 3/28/2005 Particulate Retest

sample_ports-1

1 PM (Filterable) FALSE 50931 2/15/06 to 2/16/06 Emission Testing.

sample_ports-1

1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) FALSE 50931 2/15/06 to 2/16/06 Emission Testing.

sample_ports-1

1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) FALSE 50931 2/15/06 to 2/16/06 Emission Testing.

sample_ports-1

2 PM (Filterable) FALSE 50931 2/15/06 to 2/16/06 Emission Testing.

sample_ports-1

3 PM10 (Filterable) FALSE 50931 2/5/07 to 2/7/07 Emission Testing

sample_ports-1

1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) FALSE 50931 2/5/07 to 2/7/07 Emission Testing

sample_ports-1

1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) FALSE 50931 2/5/07 to 2/7/07 Emission Testing

sample_ports-1

2 PM (Filterable) FALSE 50931 2/5/07 to 2/7/07 Emission Testing

sample_ports-1

3 PM10 (Filterable) FALSE 50931 3/24/08 to 3/26/08 Testing

sample_ports-1

1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) FALSE 50931 3/24/08 to 3/26/08 Testing

sample_ports-1

1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) FALSE 50931 3/24/08 to 3/26/08 Testing

sample_ports-1

2 PM (Filterable) FALSE 50931 3/24/08 to 3/26/08 Testing

sample_ports-1

3 PM10 (Filterable) FALSE 50931 3/16/09 to 3/18/09 testing

sample_ports-1

1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) FALSE 50931 3/16/09 to 3/18/09 testing

sample_ports-1

1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) FALSE 50931 3/16/09 to 3/18/09 testing

sample_ports-1

2 PM (Filterable) FALSE 50931 3/16/09 to 3/18/09 testing

sample_ports-1

3 PM10 (Filterable) FALSE

Page 74sampling_run_pollutants1

em ission_rate

em ission_rate_units

em ission_rate_ND

em ission_rate_MDL

em ission_factor

em ission_factor_units

em ission_factor_ND

em ission_factor_MDL

run_pollutant_comment 112.12 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temperture: 340F Emissions in excess of permit limit due to baghouse malfuncion. Retested and passed. See 3/28/05 test report. 18.59 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Non-compliance test. Stack temp: 339F 20.21 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp:344F 0.000568 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 352f 500.73 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp:344F 16 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 340F 585.3 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 332 F 24.7 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 332 F 9.01 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp and CO2 content estimated based on operating conditions. Stack Temp: 330 F; CO2:16% 1.6 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp and CO2% estimated based on operating conditions. Stack Temp: 330 F, CO2%: 16 14.05 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 323 F 435.88 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 323 F 13.21 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 326 F 2.11 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 325 f 7.9 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 318 F 446.3 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 318 F 5.658 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 319 F 2.3 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 319 F 16.3 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 317 f 531.3 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 317 F 6.12 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 307 F 1.53 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE FALSE Stack Temp: 312 F

Page 75sampling_run_pollutants1 run_pollutant_comment Stack Temperture: 340F Emissions in excess of permit limit due to baghouse malfuncion. Retested and passed. See 3/28/05 test report. Non-compliance test. Stack temp: 339F Stack Temp:344F Stack Temp: 352f Stack Temp:344F Stack Temp: 340F Stack Temp: 332 F Stack Temp: 332 F Stack Temp and CO2 content estimated based on operating conditions. Stack Temp: 330 F; CO2:16% Stack Temp and CO2% estimated based on operating conditions. Stack Temp: 330 F, CO2%: 16 Stack Temp: 323 F Stack Temp: 323 F Stack Temp: 326 F Stack Temp: 325 f Stack Temp: 318 F Stack Temp: 318 F Stack Temp: 319 F Stack Temp: 319 F Stack Temp: 317 f Stack Temp: 317 F Stack Temp: 307 F Stack Temp: 312 F

Page 76sampling_run_pollutants1 Stack Temperture: 340F Emissions in excess of permit limit due to baghouse malfuncion. Retested and passed. See 3/28/05 test report.

Page 77sampling_run_fuel

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id fuel_pollutant fuel_conc fuel_conc_units fuel_conc_ND

fuel_conc_MDL

Page 78sampling_run_fuel fuel_conc_MDL

Page 79