alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

###### [Public Notice: 4862]

          - 22 CFR Part 51
          - RIN 1400-ZA07

# AGENCY:

State Department.

# ACTION:

Interim rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of State published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of October 13, 2004, concerning request for comments on the requirement that a statement of consent submitted in support of a minor's application be notarized. The document contained incorrect dates.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gregory K.O. Davis, Office of Directives Management, Bureau of Administration, Department of State 202-312-9607; Fax 202-312-9603.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of October 13, 2004, in FR Doc. 04-22937, on page 60811, in the third column, correct the                         **DATES**                         caption to read:                    

# DATES:

The effective date is November 1, 2004. The Department will accept comments from the public up to November 13, 2004.

Dated: October 14, 2004.

Gregory K.O. Davis,

Regulatory Coordinator, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 04-23469 Filed 10-19-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
(iv) during any period of 12 months, individuals who at the beginning of such periodconstituted the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board), together with any new directorswhose election by the Board or whose nomination for election by the stockholders of theCompany was approved by a vote of a majority of the directors of the Company (then still inoffice) who were either directors at the beginning of such period or whose election ornomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute amajority of the Board, then in office;provided, however, that such transaction also constitutes a change in control event withinthe meaning of Section 409A.The term Permitted Holders as used above shall mean any of (i) Blackstone or its affiliates,(ii) an employee benefit plan (or trust forming a part thereof) maintained by (A) theCompany or (B) any corporation or other person or entity of which a majority of its votingpower of its voting equity securities or equity interest is owned, directly or indirectly,by the Company, and (iii) VHS Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or any ofits subsidiaries. The term Blackstone as used above shall mean each of of Blackstone FCHCapital Partners IV L.P., Blackstone Health Commitment Partners L.P., Blackstone CapitalPartners IV-A L.P., Blackstone Family Investment Partnership IV-A L.P., Blackstone HealthCommitment Partners-A L.P., Blackstone FCH Capital Partners IV-B L.P., and Blackstone FCHCapital Partners IV-A L.P., and their respective Affiliates.”3. Amendment to Section 11(e)(i). Section 11(e)(i) of the EA shall be amended byadding the following phrase to the end of the paragraph as follows:“; for greater certainty, the pro-rata portion of the Executive’s current year annual bonuswill be determined following the end of the applicable measurement period and will be paidat the same as annual bonuses are otherwise paid to the Company’s senior executives.”4. Amendment to Section 11(g). Section 11(g) of the EA shall be amended by adding thefollowing sentence to the end of Section 11(g):“Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of Section 409A, the right to a series ofinstallment payments under this Agreement shall be treated as a right to a series ofseparate payments and, in addition, any payment that is otherwise exempt from theapplication of Section 409A shall not be included in the calculation of DeferredCompensation Separation Benefits.”5. Ratification. All other provisions of the EA remain unchanged and are herebyratified by the Company and the Executive.
 
2

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its dulyauthorized officer and the Executive has executed this Amendment, each as of the day and year firstset forth above.         **Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.**           By: /s/ Ronald P. Soltman             Name: Ronald P. Soltman      Title:   Executive Vice President           **Executive:**    /s/ Keith B. Pitts           Keith B. Pitts  
 
3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

LAMAR ADVANTAGE GP COMPANY, LLC,

Respondents

v.

CITY OF PITTSBURGH ZONING BOARD 

OF ADJUSTMENT AND CITY OF 

PITTSBURGH,

Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 409 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all 

remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether the holding of the panel in this matter that a static vinyl advertising 

sign could replace an electronic advertising sign was inconsistent with the 

holding in Lamar Advertising Co. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of the Municipality 

of Monroeville, 939 A.2d 994 (Pa.Commw. Ct. 2007) that static vinyl 

advertising signs and electronic advertising signs are so different that one 

cannot simply replace the other without application for and issuance of a 

new zoning and building permit?
### §2004. Sale of personalty generally

Any personalty sold under any order or decree of any court of the United States shall be sold in accordance with section 2001 of this title, unless the court orders otherwise.

This section shall not apply to sales and proceedings under Title 11 or by receivers or conservators of banks appointed by the Comptroller of the Currency.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 959.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §848 (Mar. 3, 1893, ch. 225, §2, 27 Stat. 751; Apr. 24, 1935, ch. 77, §2, 49 Stat. 160; June 19, 1935, ch. 276, 49 Stat. 390).

A provision making the section applicable to pending proceedings was deleted as obsolete.

Changes were made in phraseology.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Guided Cave Tours

Jewel Cave National Monument
#### § 131.410 Maximum grant.

No individual WBC project will receive a WBC grant in any fiscal year under a cooperative agreement in excess of the amount authorized by statute. While an individual WBC project cannot exceed the statutory limit, a recipient organization is not limited from establishing multiple WBC projects as long as the projects are distinct from each other and are serving distinct populations that would not otherwise be served.
#### John R. Kilpatrick, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. Robert J. Rose et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Bob Rose Improvement Co., et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
### **CHAPTER 133—REVIEW—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS**

Sec.
2101.
Supreme Court; time for appeal or certiorari; docketing; stay.
2102.
Priority of criminal case on appeal from State court.
[2103.
Repealed.]
2104.
Reviews of State court decisions.
2105.
Scope of review; abatement.
2106.
Determination.
2107.
Time for appeal to court of appeals.
2108.
Proof of amount in controversy.
2109.
Quorum of Supreme Court justices absent.
[2110.
Repealed.]
2111.
Harmless error.
2112.
Record on review and enforcement of agency orders.
2113.
Definition.

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### 1949 Act

This section inserts in the chapter analysis of chapter 133 of title 28, U.S.C., a new item "2111," in view of the insertion in such title, by another section of this bill, of a new section 2111.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–352, §5(c), (d)(2), June 27, 1988, 102 Stat. 663, struck out item 2103 "Appeal from State court or from a United States court of appeals improvidently taken regarded as petition for writ of certiorari" and substituted "Reviews of State court decisions" for "Appeals from State courts" in item 2104.

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §136, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 41, struck out item 2110 "Time for appeal to Court of Claims in tort claims cases".

**1970**—Pub. L. 91–358, title I, §172(a)(2)(B), July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 590, added item 2113.

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–669, §2, Sept. 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 556, substituted "or from a United States court of appeals improvidently taken regarded as petition for" for "improvidently taken regarded as" in item 2103.

**1958**—Pub. L. 85–791, §1, Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 941, added item 2112.

**1949**—Act May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §105, 63 Stat. 104, added item 2111.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. §1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Allegro Biodiesel Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Heng
      Chuk, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Heng ChukHeng
                ChukChief
                Financial OfficerAugust
                7, 2007




A
      signed
      original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-081

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, May 20, 1997)

NRC CERTIFIES ABB-CE'S

SYSTEM 80+ REACTOR DESIGN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is amending its

regulations to certify the System 80+ standard plant design

developed by Asea Brown Boveri-Combustion Engineering, Inc. (ABBCE). The certification is the second to be issued under the

NRC's new licensing process for standard design certification and

will be valid for 15 years.

A utility that wishes to build and operate a new nuclear

power plant may choose to use the design and reference it in an

application for a license. Safety issues within the scope of the

certified design will not be subject to litigation, although

site-specific environmental impacts associated with building and

operating the plant at a particular location will be litigable.

Future applicants for a license could make plant-specific

changes to portions of the System 80+ standard design by

following the procedures set out in the design certification

rule. The applicant or licensee would be required to maintain

records of all such changes until the license is terminated.

No application for a license using the System 80+ standard

design has been filed with the NRC, and issuance of this

regulation does not authorize construction of any specific new

nuclear power plant.

The NRC published a proposed rule on this subject in the

Federal Register on April 7, 1995, for public comment and held

public meetings to explain the proposal on May 11 and December 4

of that year. The agency also offered an opportunity to request

a hearing on the proposed certification of the System 80+ design.

No requests were received.

Responses to the comments received are discussed in a

Federal Register notice on the final rule to be published on May

21.
2#
| NAME OFSUBSIDIARY                    | JURISDICTION OFORGANIZATION/FORMATION | NAME UNDER WHICH ITDOES BUSINESS         |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                  |                                     |
| TrackGroup Chile SpA                 | Republicof Chile                      | SecureAlertChile SpA                     |
| TrackGroup, Inc.                     | Stateof Delaware                      | SecureAlertMonitoring, Inc.              |
| TrackGroup – Puerto Rico Inc. | PuertoRico                            | InternationalSurveillance Services Corp. |
| TrackGroup Americas, Inc.            | Utah                                  | EmergeMonitoring Inc.                    |
| TrackGroup Analytics Limited         | Canada                                | G2Research                               |
| TrackGroup International Ltd.        | Israel                                | GPSGlobal                                |
| EmergeMonitoring, Inc.               | Florida                               | TrackGroup Americas                      |
| EmergeMonitoring II LLC.             | Florida                               | EmergeMonitoring II Inc.                 |
| IntegratedMonitoring Systems, LLC    | Colorado                              | IntegratedMonitoring Systems, LLC        |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>  U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1
<CASH>                                       10,787,000
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                10,899,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  3,913,000
<INVENTORY>                                   6,982,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             25,666,000
<PP&E>                                       16,235,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               12,910,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               33,748,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         8,191,000
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        106,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   25,384,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 33,748,000
<SALES>                                       8,747,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              8,747,000
<CGS>                                         8,305,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 8,305,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              5,233,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              200,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (4,829,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      6,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (4,835,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (4,835,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.51)




</TABLE>
§ 16.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with handicaps an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with handicaps.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used to communicate with persons with impaired hearing.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 16.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with handicaps receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
#### Rose Pousa et al., Individually and as Administratrices of the Estate of Joseph Pousa, Deceased, Respondents, v. Netall Leasing Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
#### § 327.4 Disputes.

In the event of an interagency dispute about the regulations developed by the Department of Defense in accordance with this order, the Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency, shall adjudicate.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-57 May 19, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC REVOKES RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS LICENSE

OF DELAWARE ENGINEERING FIRM OVER VIOLATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has revoked the

radioactive materials license of Capital Engineering Services

Inc. of Dover, Delaware, for failing to pay required licensing

fees and continuing to use radioactive material after its license

was suspended.

The order issued by NRC also bars David F. Johns, Capital's

president and radiation safety officer, from engaging in NRClicensed activities for three years.

During this period, Johns also must inform any prospective

employer performing NRC-licensed work of the order. And

following the suspension period, Johns is required to notify the

NRC before taking part in activities licensed by the agency.

In September 1993, Capital Engineering was issued an NRC

license authorizing it to possess and use moisture\density gauges

containing sealed radioactive sources. The gauges are used for

various industrial and construction purposes, such as measuring

moisture levels in soil. The license was due to expire in

September 1998.

But in February 1996, the license was suspended by the NRC

after the company failed to pay required fees. In May 1996, NRC

granted a request by Capital Engineering to pay the delinquent

fees in 12 monthly installments, and extended the effective date

of the order to March 15, 1997. At the same time, the NRC said

that its suspension order would immediately become effective if

the company failed to make the required payments on its licensing

fee.

The first installment payment was due on June 15, 1996 but

was not made. Consequently, Capital Engineering’s license was

suspended the following day. Nevertheless, the firm continued to

use the gauges.

Based on the findings of an NRC inspection and an

investigation, the NRC has concluded Capital Engineering

committed the following violations: 1) deliberately used

licensed material on numerous occasions despite a suspended

license; 2) failed to maintain dose records for employees who

used gauges; and 3) failed to test sealed sources for leakage
2

and/or contamination.

Johns must submit in writing an answer to the order, and may

request a hearing, within 20 days.

#