60964 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 

Administrator certifies that this rule 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities under the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this 

rule approves pre-existing requirements 

under state law and does not impose 

any additional enforceable duty beyond 

that required by state law, it does not 

contain any unfunded mandate or 

significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments, as described in the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(Pub. L. 104–4). 

This rule also does not have tribal 

implications because it will not have a 

substantial direct effect on one or more 

Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

as specified by Executive Order 13175 

(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This 

action also does not have Federalism 

implications because it does not have 

substantial direct effects on the States, 

on the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, 

August 10, 1999). This action merely 

approves a state rule implementing a 

Federal standard, and does not alter the 

relationship or the distribution of power 

and responsibilities established in the 

Clean Air Act. This rule also is not 

subject to Executive Order 13045 

‘‘Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), 

because it is not economically 

significant.

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s 

role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the 

absence of a prior existing requirement 

for the State to use voluntary consensus 

standards (VCS), EPA has no authority 

to disapprove a SIP submission for 

failure to use VCS. It would thus be 

inconsistent with applicable law for 

EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, 

to use VCS in place of a SIP submission 

that otherwise satisfies the provisions of 

the Clean Air Act. Thus, the 

requirements of section 12(d) of the 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 

272 note) do not apply. This rule does 

not impose an information collection 

burden under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this rule and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by December 13, 

2004. Filing a petition for 

reconsideration by the Administrator of 

this final rule does not affect the finality 

of this rule for the purposes of judicial 

review nor does it extend the time 

within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. This action may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds.

Dated: September 10, 2004. 

Laura Yoshii, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

■ Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows:

PART 52—[AMENDED]

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52 

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F—California

■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(331) to read as 

follows:

§ 52.220 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * * 

(331) New and amended regulations 

for the following APCDs were submitted 

on June 3, 2004, by the Governor’s 

designee. 

(i) Incorporation by reference. 

(A) San Joaquin Valley Unified Air 

Pollution Control District. 

(1) Rule 4610 amended on April 17, 

2003.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 04–22956 Filed 10–13–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 271 

[FRL–7825–8] 

Florida: Final Authorization of State 

Hazardous Waste Management 

Program Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Immediate final rule.

SUMMARY: Florida has applied to EPA for 

Final authorization of the changes to its 

hazardous waste program under the 

Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act (RCRA). EPA has determined that 

these changes satisfy all requirements 

needed to qualify for Final 

authorization, and is authorizing the 

State’s changes through this immediate 

final action. EPA is publishing this rule 

to authorize the changes without a prior 

proposal because we believe this action 

is not controversial and do not expect 

comments that oppose it. Unless we get 

written comments which oppose this 

authorization during the comment 

period, the decision to authorize 

Florida’s changes to their hazardous 

waste program will take effect. If we get 

comments that oppose this action, we 

will publish a document in the Federal 

Register withdrawing this rule before it 

takes effect and a separate document in 

the proposed rules section of this 

Federal Register will serve as a proposal 

to authorize the changes.

DATES: This Final authorization will 

become effective on December 13, 2004, 

unless EPA receives adverse written 

comment by November 15, 2004. If EPA 

receives such comment, it will publish 

a timely withdrawal of this immediate 

final rule in the Federal Register and 

inform the public that this authorization 

will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to 

Audrey E. Baker, Florida Authorizations 

Coordinator, RCRA Programs Branch, 

Waste Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, The 

Sam Nunn Federal Center, 61 Forsyth 

Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–

8960; (404) 562–8483. You may also email your comments to 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 60965

Baker.Audrey@epa.gov or submit your 

comments at http://

www.regulations.gov. We must receive 

your comments by November 15, 2004. 

You can view and copy Florida’s 

application from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. at The 

Florida Department of Environmental 

Protection, Twin Towers Office 

Building, 2600 Blair Stone Road, 

Tallahassee, Florida 32399–2400 and 

from 8:30 a.m. to 3:45 p.m. EPA, Region 

4 Library, The Sam Nunn Atlanta 

Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960, Phone 

number (404) 562–8190, Patricia 

Strougal, Librarian.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey E. Baker, Florida Authorizations 

Coordinator, RCRA Programs Branch, 

Waste Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, The 

Sam Nunn Federal Center, 61 Forsyth 

Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–

8960; (404) 562–8483.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Why Are Revisions to State 

Programs Necessary? 

States which have received final 

authorization from EPA under RCRA 

section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must 

maintain a hazardous waste program 

that is equivalent to, consistent with, 

and no less stringent than the Federal 

program. As the Federal program 

changes, States must change their 

programs and ask EPA to authorize the 

changes. Changes to State programs may 

be necessary when Federal or State 

statutory or regulatory authority is 

modified or when certain other changes 

occur. Most commonly, States must 

change their programs because of 

changes to EPA’s regulations in 40 Code 

of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 

260 through 266, 268, 270, 273 and 279. 

B. What Decisions Have We Made in 

This Rule? 

We conclude that Florida’s 

application to revise its authorized 

program meets all of the statutory and 

regulatory requirements established by 

RCRA. Therefore, we grant Florida Final 

authorization to operate its hazardous 

waste program with the changes 

described in the authorization 

application. Florida has responsibility 

for permitting Treatment, Storage, and 

Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) within its 

borders and for carrying out the aspects 

of the RCRA program described in its 

revised program application, subject to 

the limitations of the Hazardous and 

Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 

(HSWA). New Federal requirements and 

prohibitions imposed by Federal 

regulations that EPA promulgates under 

the authority of HSWA take effect in 

authorized States before they are 

authorized for the requirements. Thus, 

EPA will implement those requirements 

and prohibitions in Florida, including 

issuing permits, until the State is 

granted authorization to do so. 

C. What Is the Effect of Today’s 

Authorization Decision? 

The effect of this decision is that a 

facility in Florida subject to RCRA will 

now have to comply with the authorized 

State requirements instead of the 

equivalent Federal requirements in 

order to comply with RCRA. Florida has 

enforcement responsibilities under its 

State hazardous waste program for 

violations of such program, but EPA 

retains its authority under RCRA 

sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003, 

which include, among others, authority 

to: 

• Do inspections, and require 

monitoring, tests, analyses or reports 

• Enforce RCRA requirements and 

suspend or revoke permits 

• Take enforcement actions regardless 

of whether the State has taken its own 

actions 

This action does not impose 

additional requirements on the 

regulated community because the 

regulations for which Florida is being 

authorized by today’s action are already 

effective, and are not changed by today’s 

action. 

D. Why Wasn’t There a Proposed Rule 

Before Today’s Rule? 

EPA did not publish a proposal before 

today’s rule because we view this as a 

routine program change and do not 

expect comments that oppose this 

approval. We are providing an 

opportunity for public comment now. In 

addition to this rule, in the proposed 

rules section of today’s Federal Register

we are publishing a separate document 

that proposes to authorize the State 

program changes. 

E. What Happens if EPA Receives 

Comments That Oppose This Action? 

If EPA receives comments that oppose 

this authorization, we will withdraw 

this rule by publishing a document in 

the Federal Register before the rule 

becomes effective. EPA will base any 

further decision on the authorization of 

the State program changes on the 

proposal mentioned in the previous 

paragraph. We will then address all 

public comments in a later final rule. 

You may not have another opportunity 

to comment. If you want to comment on 

this authorization, you must do so at 

this time. 

If we receive comments that oppose 

only the authorization of a particular 

change to the State hazardous waste 

program, we will withdraw that part of 

this rule but the authorization of the 

program changes that the comments do 

not oppose will become effective on the 

date specified above. The Federal 

Register withdrawal document will 

specify which part of the authorization 

will become effective, and which part is 

being withdrawn.

F. What Has Florida Previously Been 

Authorized for? 

Florida initially received Final 

authorization on January 29, 1985, 

effective February 12, 1985 (50 FR 

3908), to implement the RCRA 

hazardous waste management program. 

We granted authorization for changes to 

their program on December 1, 1987, 

effective March 3, 1988 (52 FR 45634), 

December 16, 1988, effective January 3, 

1989 (53 FR 50529), December 14, 1990, 

effective February 12, 1991 (55 FR 

51416), February 5, 1992, effective April 

6, 1992 (57 FR 4371), February 7, 1992, 

effective April 7, 1992 (57 FR 4738), 

May 20, 1992, effective July 20, 1992 (57 

FR 21351), November 9, 1993, effective 

January 10, 1994, (58 FR 59367), July 11, 

1994, effective September 9, 1994 (59 

FR 35266), August 16, 1994, effective 

October 17, 1994 (59 41979), October 

26, 1994, effective December 27, 1994 

(59 FR 53753), April 1, 1997, effective 

June 2, 1997 (62 FR 15407), August 23, 

2001, effective October 22, 2001 (66 FR 

44307), August 20, 2002, effective 

October 21, 2002 (67 FR 53886 and 67 

FR 53889). The authorized Florida 

program, through RCRA Cluster IV, was 

incorporated by reference into the CFR 

on January 20, 1998, effective March 23, 

1998 (63 FR 2896). Florida received 

corrective action authority on 

September 18, 2000, effective November 

18, 2000 (65 FR 56256). 

G. What Changes Are We Authorizing 

With Today’s Action? 

Florida has submitted final complete 

program revision applications on 

seeking authorization of their changes in 

accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. 

Florida’s revision consists of provisions 

promulgated July 1, 1997 through June 

30, 1998 (RCRA Cluster VIII), July 1, 

1998 through June 30, 1999 (RCRA IX), 

and July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000, 

otherwise known as RCRA Cluster X. 

The rule adoption for RCRA Cluster VIII 

was effective on February 4, 2000. The 

rule adoption for RCRA Clusters IX and 

X was effective on December 20, 2000. 

Florida Statutes Chapter 403 allows the 

Florida Department of Environmental 

Protection to administer the rules 

60966 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 

governing hazardous waste management 

in the state. We now make an immediate 

final decision, subject to receipt of 

written comments that oppose this 

action, that Florida’s hazardous waste 

program revisions satisfy all of the 

requirements necessary to qualify for 

Final authorization. Therefore, we grant 

Florida Final authorization for the 

following program changes:

Description of federal requirement Federal Register Analogous state authority 

Checklist 160, Land Disposal Restrictions Phase III—Emergency Extension of the K088 National Capacity Variance, Amendment.July 14, 1997 

62 FR 37694–37699 

Rule 62–730.183, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). 

Checklist 161, Emergency Revision of the Carbamate Land Disposal Restrictions.August 28, 1997 

62 FR 45568–45573 

Rule 62–730.183, F.A.C. 

Checklist 163, Organic Air Emission Standards for Tanks, Surface Impoundments, and Containers, Clarification and Technical Amendment.December 8, 1997 

62 FR 64636–64671 

Rules 62–730.180(1), 62–730.180(2), 

62–730.220(3) F.A.C. 

Checklist 164, Kraft Mill Steam Stripper Condensate Exclusion ................ April 15, 1998 

63 FR 18504–18751 

Rule 62–730.030(1), F.A.C. 

Checklist 167A, Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV—Treatment Standards for Metal Wastes and Mineral Processing Wastes.May 26, 1998 

63 FR 28556–28753 

Rule 62—730.183, F.A.C. 

Checklist 167C, Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV–Corrections ........... May 26, 1998 

62 FR 28556–28753 

Rule 62–730.183, F.A.C. 

Checklist 167E, Bevill Exclusion Revisions and Clarifications .................... May 26, 1998 

63 FR 28556–28753 

Rule 62–730.030(1), F.A.C. 

Checklist 168, Hazardous Waste Combustors; Revised Standards ........... June 19, 1998 

63 FR 33782–33829 

Rules 62–730.030(1) and 62–730–

220(3), F.A.C. 

Checklist 169, Petroleum Refining Process Wastes ................................... August 6, 1998 

63 FR 42110–42189 

Rules 62–730.030(1), 62–730.181(1), 

and 62–730.183(1), F.A.C. 

Checklist 170, Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV—Zinc Micronutrient 

Fertilizers Amendments.

August 31, 1998 

63 FR 46332–46334 

Rule 62–730.183(1), F.A.C. 

Checklist 171, Emergency Revision of the Land Disposal Restrictions 

(LDR) Treatment Standards for Listed Hazardous Wastes from Carbamate Production.

September 4, 1998 

63 FR 47410–47418 

Rule 62–730.183(1), F.A.C. 

Checklist 172, Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV—Extension of Compliance Date for Characteristic Slags.September 9, 1998 

63 FR 48124–48127 

Rule 62–730.183(1), F.A.C. 

Checklist 173, Land Disposal Restrictions; Treatment Standards for 

Spent Potliners from Primary Aluminum Reduction (K088); Final Rule.

September 24, 1998 

63 FR 51254–51267 

Rule 62–730.183(1), F.A.C. 

Checklist 174, Post-Closure Permit and Closure Process .......................... October 22, 1998 

63 FR 56710–56735 

Rules 62–730.180(1), 62–730.180(2), 

62–730.220(3) F.A.C. 

Checklist 175, HWIR–Media ........................................................................ November 30, 1998 

63 FR 65874–65947 

Rules 62–730.020(1), 62–730.030(1), 

62–730.180(1), 62–730.180(2), 62–

730.183(1), 62–730.220(3), F.A.C. 

Checklist 176, Universal Waste Rule—Technical Amendments ................. December 24, 1998 

63 FR 71225–71230 

Rules 62–730.181(1), 62–730.185(1), 

F.A.C. 

Checklist 177, Organic Air Emission Standards: Clarification and Technical Amendments.January 21, 1999 

64 FR 3382 

Rules 62–730.160(1), 62–730.180(1), 

62–730.180(2), F.A.C 

Checklist 179, Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV—Technical Corrections and Clarifications to Treatment Standards.May 11, 1999 

64 FR 25408–25417 

Rules 62–730.030(1), 62–730.160(1), 

62–730.183(1), F.A.C. 

Checklist 180, Test Procedures for the Analysis of Oil and Grease and 

Non-Polar Material.

May 14, 1999 

64 FR 26315–26327 

Rule 62–730.021(1)(a), F.A.C. 

Checklist 183, Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV—Technical Corrections.October 20, 1999 

64 FR 56469–56472 

Rules 62–730.030(2), 62.730.160(1), 

62–730.183(2), F.A.C. 

Checklist 184, Accumulation Time for Waste Water Treatment Sludges ... March 8, 2000 

65 FR 12378–12398 

Rule 62–730.160(1), F.A.C. 

Checklist 185, Organobromine Production Wastes Vacatur ....................... March 17, 2000 

65 FR 14472–14475 

Rules 62–730.030(2) 62–730.183(2), 

F.A.C. 

Checklist 187, Petroleum Refining Process Wastes—Clarification ............. June 8, 2000 

64 FR 36365-36367 

Rules 62–730.030(2) 62–730.183(2), 

F.A.C. 

H. Where Are the Revised State Rules 

Different From the Federal Rules? 

Florida did not follow the April 9, 

1999, vacatur issued by the U.S. Court 

of Appeals for the District of Columbia 

as it relates to the listing of 

organobromine production wastes at 40 

CFR 268.40/Table ‘‘Treatment Standards 

for Hazardous Wastes’’ and 268.48(a)/

Table Universal Treatment Standards 

(UTS). The State adopted the federal 

regulations as published in the May 26, 

1998, rule in tables 40 CFR 268.40 and 

268.48.

I. Who Handles Permits After the 

Authorization Takes Effect? 

Florida will issue permits for all the 

provisions for which it is authorized 

and will administer the permits it 

issues. EPA will continue to administer 

any RCRA hazardous waste permits or 

portions of permits which we issued 

prior to the effective date of this 

authorization until they expire or are 

terminated. We will not issue any more 

new permits or new portions of permits 

for the provisions listed in the Table 

above after the effective date of this 

authorization. EPA will continue to 

implement and issue permits for HSWA 

requirements for which Florida is not 

yet authorized. 

J. What Is Codification and Is EPA 

Codifying Florida’s Hazardous Waste 

Program as Authorized in This Rule? 

Codification is the process of placing 

the State’s statutes and regulations that 

comprise the State’s authorized 

hazardous waste program into the Code 

of Federal Regulations. We do this by 

referencing the authorized State rules in 

40 CFR part 272. We reserve the 

amendment of 40 CFR part 272, subpart 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 198 / Thursday, October 14, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 60967

L for this authorization of Florida’s 

program changes until a later date. 

K. Administrative Requirements 

The Office of Management and Budget 

has exempted this action from the 

requirements of Executive Order 12866 

(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), and 

therefore this action is not subject to 

review by OMB. This action authorizes 

State requirements for the purpose of 

RCRA 3006 and imposes no additional 

requirements beyond those imposed by 

State law. Accordingly, I certify that this 

action will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq.). Because this action authorizes 

pre-existing requirements under State 

law and does not impose any additional 

enforceable duty beyond that required 

by State law, it does not contain any 

unfunded mandate or significantly or 

uniquely affect small governments, as 

described in the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4). 

For the same reason, this action also 

does not significantly or uniquely affect 

the communities of Tribal governments, 

as specified by Executive Order 13175 

(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This 

action will not have substantial direct 

effects on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government, as 

specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 

FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it 

merely authorizes State requirements as 

part of the State RCRA hazardous waste 

program without altering the 

relationship or the distribution of power 

and responsibilities established by 

RCRA. This action also is not subject to 

Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997), because it is not 

economically significant and it does not 

make decisions based on environmental 

health or safety risks. This rule is not 

subject to Executive Order 13211, 

‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May 

22, 2001)) because it is not a significant 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

12866. 

Under RCRA 3006(b), EPA grants a 

State’s application for authorization as 

long as the State meets the criteria 

required by RCRA. It would thus be 

inconsistent with applicable law for 

EPA, when it reviews a State 

authorization application, to require the 

use of any particular voluntary 

consensus standard in place of another 

standard that otherwise satisfies the 

requirements of RCRA. Thus, the 

requirements of section 12(d) of the 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 

272 note) do not apply. As required by 

section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 

FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing 

this rule, EPA has taken the necessary 

steps to eliminate drafting errors and 

ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, 

and provide a clear legal standard for 

affected conduct. EPA has complied 

with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 

8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the 

takings implications of the rule in 

accordance with the ‘‘Attorney 

General’s Supplemental Guidelines for 

the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of 

Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under 

the executive order. This rule does not 

impose an information collection 

burden under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this document and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication in the Federal Register. A 

major rule cannot take effect until 60 

days after it is published in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This 

action will be effective December 13, 

2004.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Confidential business information, 

Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste 

transportation, Indian lands, 

Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements.

Authority: This action is issued under the 

authority of 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).

Dated: March 26, 2004. 

A. Stanley Meiburg, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

[FR Doc. 04–22590 Filed 10–13–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

48 CFR Chapter I and Part 52

[FAC 2001–25 Corrections] 

Federal Acquisition Regulation; 

Corrections

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DOD), 

General Services Administration (GSA), 

and National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Corrections.

SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency 

Acquisition Council and the Defense 

Acquisition Regulations Council are 

issuing corrections to the Introduction 

and Technical Amendments (Item V) 

documents in FAC 2001–25, published 

in the Federal Register at 69 FR 59698 

and 59704, October 5, 2004.

DATES: Effective October 14, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Laurie Duarte at (202) 501–4755, 

General Services Administration, FAR 

Secretariat, Washington, DC 20405. 

Corrections 

In the final and interim rule 

documents appearing in the issue of 

October 5, 2004:

■ 1. In the table on page 59698, third 

column, third entry, ‘‘2003–035’’ should 

read ‘‘2003–025’’.

52.215–15 [Corrected]

■ 2. In 52.215–15:

■ A. Revise the date of the clause to read 

‘‘(Oct 2004)’’; and

■ B. In paragraph (b)(2) of the clause, 

remove ‘‘48 CFR 904.413–50(c)(12)(vi)’’

and add ‘‘48 CFR 9904.413–

50(c)(12)(vi)’’ in its place.

Dated: October 7, 2004. 

Laurie Duarte, 

FAR Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 04–22964 Filed 10–13–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–EP–M

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

48 CFR Parts 1852, 1853 and 1872 

RIN 2700–AC88 

Re-Issuance of NASA FAR Supplement 

Subchapters H and I

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration.