alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Richard E. Stoddard, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Kaiser Ventures LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this amended annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this amended report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                                       
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: March 26, 2007 |  | /s/ Richard E. Stoddard               
|                     |  | Richard E. Stoddard                   
|                     |  | Chairman of the Board, President & CEO
Exhibit 31.1 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**pursuant to Section 302 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Heng Chuk, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Diametrics Medical, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to meby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 14, 2006
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAEOSS runtime manual for system analysis on Advanced Earth-Orbital Spacecraft SystemsAdvanced earth orbital spacecraft system (AEOSS) enables users to project the required power, weight, and cost for a generic earth-orbital spacecraft system. These variables are calculated on the component and subsystem levels, and then the system level. The included six subsystems are electric power, thermal control, structure, auxiliary propulsion, attitude control, and communication, command, and data handling. The costs are computed using statistically determined models that were derived from the flown spacecraft in the past and were categorized into classes according to their functions and structural complexity. Selected design and performance analyses for essential components and subsystems are also provided. AEOSS has the feature permitting a user to enter known values of these parameters, totally and partially, at all levels. All information is of vital importance to project managers of subsystems or a spacecraft system. AEOSS is a specially tailored software coded from the relational database program of the Acius' 4th Dimension with a Macintosh version. Because of the licensing agreements, two versions of the AEOSS documents were prepared. This version, AEOSS Runtime Manual, is permitted to be distributed with a finite number of the restrictive 4D Runtime version. It can perform all contained applications without any programming alterations.Document ID19910011911Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLee, Hwa-Ping*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:100773NASA-TM-100773Accession Number91N21224Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-49-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910011911.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-04 January 15, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH PUBLIC TO DISCUSS SAXTON DECOMMISSIONING

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with the public on

January 28, 1997, to discuss the decommissioning of the Saxton Nuclear

Experimental Facility near Saxton, Pa. Reactor operations at the facility

were terminated in May 1972.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. in the Saxton Fire Hall at 8th and

North Street in Saxton.

The meeting will include a presentation by the NRC on the

decommissioning regulatory process, a licensee presentation on its planned

decommissioning activities, and a question and answer period.

Saxton's post-decommissioning activities report, which was filed in

February 1996, is available for public inspection at the NRC's local public

document room at the Saxton Community Library and at the NRC's Public Document

Room in Washington.

#
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-51116, 33-39557, 33-39556, 333-17843) pertaining to the Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, the KaiserSteel Resources, Inc. 1989 Officer Bonus Program, the Amended, Restated and Substituted Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Stock Plan, and the Kaiser Ventures Inc. 1995 Stock Plan, as amended, respectively, of Kaiser Ventures LLC of our report datedJanuary 22, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Kaiser Ventures LLC and Subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

|           | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |   |
|----------------|---------------------------|--------|
|           |                           |   |
|           | **Ernst & Young LLP** |   |
|           |                      |   |
| March 24, 2003 |                      |   |
#### Yolanda WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CINTAS CORPORATION; Expect First Aid Corporation, a Division of Cintas Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-10976.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

Yolanda Williams, Dallas, TX, pro se.

R Rogge Dunn, Gregory Michael Clift, Cheryl Lisa Mann, Clouse Dunn Hirsch, Dallas, TX, Defendants-Appellees.

Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In November 2000, Yolanda Williams (“Plaintiff’) executed an employment agreement with Cintas Corporation and Expect First Aid Corporation (“Defendants”) which contained a compulsory arbitration clause requiring all disputes regarding the employment to be submitted to binding arbitration. In March 2003, Plaintiff initiated her first lawsuit against Defendants asserting claims for racial discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Defendants moved to compel arbitration and dismiss the lawsuit in April 2003, and in June 2003, the district court entered an order granting Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. The parties proceeded to arbitration under the supervision of the American Arbitration Association. In January 2005, the arbitrator issued his award denying all of Plaintiffs requested relief. In March 2005, the arbitrator denied Plaintiffs request for modification of the arbitrator’s award. In April 2005, Plaintiff initiated her second lawsuit against Defendants, once again claiming discrimination and retaliation under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. On motion of Defendants, the district court dismissed Plaintiffs second complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted under *181Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiff appealed to this Court.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts, the reply brief and relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion and order filed July 15, 2005, we affirm the final judgment entered by the district court on July 25, 2005.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No: 23-034 June 15, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Completes Safety Review of Construction Permit Application

For Kairos Test Reactor in Tennessee

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has completed its final safety evaluation for 

Kairos Power’s application to build an advanced test reactor known as Hermes at a site in Oak 

Ridge, Tennessee. The evaluation concludes there are no safety aspects that would preclude 

issuing the construction permit for the proposed reactor. 

“The staff thoroughly reviewed this first-of-a-kind advanced reactor in 18 months, well 

ahead of schedule,” said Andrea Veil, director of the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation. “This reflects the NRC’s commitment to maintaining safety, by applying riskinformed approaches, while improving efficiency.”

The staff will provide the safety evaluation and the final environmental impact statement, 

which is on track to be completed in September, to the Commission for the mandatory hearing 

phase of the licensing process. During the mandatory hearing, expected later this year, the 

Commission will examine whether the staff’s review supports the findings necessary to issue the 

permit. Following the hearing, the Commission will vote on whether to authorize the staff to 

issue the permit.

Kairos submitted its permit application in two parts, in September and October 2021, 

seeking to build the non-power reactor, which uses tri-structural isotropic particle fuel and 

molten salt to cool the reactor core. The test reactor is intended to provide operational data to 

support the development of a larger version for commercial deployment. The company will have 

to submit a separate application in the future for an operating license for Hermes. More 

information on the construction permit review is available on the NRC website. 

The NRC’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards independently reviewed safetyrelated aspects of the Kairos application. The committee provided the results of its review to the 

Commission on May 16, 2023.
Index of CBI Communication with Companies

1.) CBI Placeholder: Feb. 2, 2012 – Correspondence from Golden Refrigerant to EPA 2.) CBI Placeholder: Feb. 2, 2012 – Correspondence from Polar Technology LLC to EPA 3.) CBI Placeholder: Feb. 2, 2012– Correspondence from Refrigerant Exchange to EPA 4.) CBI Placeholder: Feb. 3, 2012 – Correspondence from Airgas Refrigerants to EPA 5.) CBI Placeholder: Feb. 3, 2012 – Correspondence from Coolgas Inc. to EPA 6.) CBI Placeholder: Feb. 3, 2012– Correspondence from Total Reclaim to EPA 7.) CBI Placeholder: Feb. 4, 2012 – Correspondence from Pure Chem Separation to EPA 8.) CBI Placeholder: Feb. 6, 2012 – Correspondence from Advanced Refrigeration Technologies to EPA 9.) CBI Placeholder: Feb. 6, 2012– Correspondence from RemTec to EPA 10.) CBI Placeholder: Feb. 17, 2012– Correspondence from Summit Refrigerants to EPA 11.) CBI Placeholder: Mar. 13, 2012 – Correspondence from Coolgas Inc. to EPA
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Tony Waisbrot <twaisbrot@frontier.com> 

Saturday, August 04, 2012 10:18 AM 

dennis.devaney@dot.gov 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

air service to Rhinelander airport 

h 

Gentlemen, people who visit us in St. Germain would use the Rhinelander airport if it provided better connecting times. 

Thus, it would be better to have smaller planes connecting 4 times a day rather than larger planes connecting or 

departing 2 times per day even if daily passenger numbers were less withe the 4 connecting flights. 

Jet service and connecting with Delta Airlines would be an advantage, but would be outweighed by the for frequent 

connecting times with major airlines schedules or people fly in to CWA in Wausau for the time and connection 

convenience. Thanks for accepting comments. 

1
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-97

November 24, 1999

NRC CHAIRMAN RICHARD A. MESERVE TO HOLD NEWS BRIEFING

FOLLOWING VISIT TO LIMERICK GENERATING STATION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Richard A. Meserve

will visit the Limerick nuclear power plant on Tuesday, November

30. Dr. Meserve will tour the site and meet with plant

officials. He will hold a media briefing at the close of his

plant visit.

The plant, in Limerick, Pa., is operated by PECO Energy

Company.

The media briefing will begin at 4:15 p.m. in the plant’s

Information Center, located at 298 Longview Road near the

Limerick site.

Dr. Meserve was sworn in as Chairman of the NRC on October

29. A brief biography can be found on the NRC’s web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRC/WHATIS/meserve.vitae.html

#
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Technical Assistance Request on Whether a Cardiologist Must be Authorized by NRC to Interpret Nuclear Medicine Patient Scans, DePaul Hospital, Cheyenne, WY

## HPPOS-313 PDR-9306250172

See the memorandum from J. E. Glenn to W. E. Fisher dated February 14, 1991. 

This memorandum responds to the technical assistance request dated December 7, 1990, wherein DePaul Hospital in Cheyenne, Wyoming requests clarification as to whether a cardiologist must be authorized by NRC license to interpret nuclear medicine patient scans. The request, described in a letter dated November 14, 1990, submitted by the licensee, has been reviewed and the following directions are given. HPPOS-156 contains a related topic.

In the practice of medicine it is common to secure a second opinion or interpretation of diagnostic test results in order to arrive at a consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of each patient. In order to facilitate this process, we believe that the raw data contained in the nuclear medicine scan images may be made available for interpretation by any physician that is involved with the care of the patient. 10 CFR Part 35 does not prevent any physician from viewing, interpreting, or acting upon an interpretation of a nuclear medicine scan in the process of exercising medical judgement.

However, as described in Regulatory Guide 10.8, Rev. 2, it is the licensee's responsibility to ensure that at least one interpretation of nuclear medicine scans is performed by an authorized user or a physician under the supervision of an authorized user. The licensee must meet their obligation to ensure that a responsible party, i.e., an authorized user or physician under the supervision of an authorized user, performs an interpretation of the scan and reviews all aspects of the patient study to assure that appropriate procedures were followed and adequate results obtained. Failure of the licensee to meet this obligation may result in a violation of 10 CFR 35.25 (a) for failure to supervise, or 10 CFR 35.13 (b) for use of radioactive material by an individual not authorized on the license.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 35, Regulatory Guide 10.8, License Conditions

**Subject codes:** 1.3, 11.5

**Applicability:** Byproduct Material

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017
----

----

I Teave

Komisjon

----

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

30. jaanuar 2006

(2006/C 23/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

----

----

Liikmesriikide esitatav teave riigiabi kohta, mida antakse kooskõlas komisjoni 12. jaanuari 2001. aasta määrusega (EÜ) nr 70/2001, mis käsitleb EÜ asutamislepingu artiklite 87 ja 88 kohaldamist väikestele ja suurtele ettevõtetele antava riigiabi suhtes

(2006/C 23/02)

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

----

----

Eelteatis koondumise kohta

(Juhtum nr COMP/M.4108 — T-Systems/Gedas)

(2006/C 23/03)

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

----

(1)ELT L 24, 29.1.2004, lk 1.

----

----

Eelteatis koondumise kohta

(Juhtumi nr COMP/M.4111 — Goldman Sachs/Daiwa/SMBC/Sanyo)

Juhtumi puhul võidakse kohaldada lihtsustatud korda

(2006/C 23/04)

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

----

(1)ELT L 24, 29.1.2004, lk 1.

(2)ELT L 56, 5.3.2005, lk 32.

----
EXHIBIT A 

Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 1 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 2 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 3 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 4 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 5 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 6 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 7 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 8 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 9 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 10 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 11 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 12 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 13 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 14 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 15 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 16 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 17 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 18 of 19
Case 9:20-cv-81173-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2020 Page 19 of 19
### §1916. Seamen's suits

In all courts of the United States, seamen may institute and prosecute suits and appeals in their own names and for their own benefit for wages or salvage or the enforcement of laws enacted for their health or safety without prepaying fees or costs or furnishing security therefor.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 955.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §837 (June 12, 1917, ch. 27, §1, 40 Stat. 157; July 1, 1918, ch. 113, §1, 40 Stat. 683).

Changes in phraseology were made.