alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

HEYWOOD BECKER, TRUSTEE OF 

HANOVERIAN TRUST AND 

HANOVERIAN TRUST,

v.

ZONING HEARING BOARD OF 

STRABAN TOWNSHIP

PETITION OF: HEYWOOD BECKER 

AND HANOVERIAN TRUST

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 698 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
### §2004. Authority of Secretary

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall—

(1) issue such rules and regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out this chapter;

(2) cooperate with regional, State, local, and other agencies, and cooperate with and furnish technical assistance to employers, labor organizations, and employment agencies to aid in effectuating the purposes of this chapter; and

(3) make investigations and inspections and require the keeping of records necessary or appropriate for the administration of this chapter.

#### (b) Subpoena authority

For the purpose of any hearing or investigation under this chapter, the Secretary shall have the authority contained in sections 49 and 50 of title 15.

(Pub. L. 100–347, §5, June 27, 1988, 102 Stat. 647.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 6 months after June 27, 1988, except that rules and regulations shall be issued not later than 90 days after June 27, 1988, see section 11 of Pub. L. 100–347, set out as a note under section 2001 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 4C—APPRENTICE LABOR**

Sec.
50.
Promotion of labor standards of apprenticeship.
50a.
Publication of information; national advisory committees.
50b.
Appointment of employees.
50c.
Improved apprenticeship program coordination between the Department of Labor and the Department of Veterans Affairs.
§ 206.400 General. ( a ) As a condition of the receipt of any disaster assistance under the Stafford Act, the applicant shall carry out any repair or construction to be financed with the disaster assistance in accordance with applicable standards of safety, decency, and sanitation and in conformity with applicable codes, specifications and standards.
( b ) Applicable codes, specifications, and standards shall include any disaster resistant building code that meets the minimum requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) as well as being substantially equivalent to the recommended provisions of the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP). In addition, the applicant shall comply with any requirements necessary in regards to Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management, Executive Order 12699, Seismic Safety of Federal and Federally Assisted or Regulated New Building Construction, and any other applicable Executive orders.
( c ) In situations where there are no locally applicable standards of safety, decency and sanitation, or where there are no applicable local codes, specifications and standards governing repair or construction activities, or where the Regional Administrator determines that otherwise applicable codes, specifications, and standards are inadequate, then the Regional Administrator may, after consultation with appropriate State and local officials, require the use of nationally applicable codes, specifications, and standards, as well as safe land use and construction practices in the course of repair or construction activities.
( d ) The mitigation planning process that is mandated by section 322 of the Stafford Act and 44 CFR part 201 can assist State and local governments in determining where codes, specifications, and standards are inadequate, and may need to be upgraded.
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 Ener1,
        Inc.
 500
        West
        Cypress Creek Road-Suite 100
 Ft.
        Lauderdale, Florida, 33309
  November
        14, 2006
 
 Securities
        and Exchange Commission
 100
        F
        Street, NE
 Washington,
        DC 20549
 
 Re:
        Certification Of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
        1350
 
 Dear
        Ladies and Gentlemen:
 
 In
        connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1,
        Inc.,
        for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission, I, Ajit Habbu, Chief Financial Officer of Ener1, Inc.,
        hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1)
                such
                    Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter
                    ended
                    September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a)
                    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                    and
  2)
                the
                    information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
                    of Ener1,
                    Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, fairly presents,
                    in all
                    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                    of
                    Ener1, Inc.
 
 /s/
                  Ajit Habbu
                
                Ajit
                  Habbu
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
                (Duly
                  Authorized Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and
                DulyAuthorized
                  Officer)
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
        document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
        that
        appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
        required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
        retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
        or its staff upon request.
 
 This
        certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to Ener1, Inc.’s
        quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
        to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
        reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange
        Act,
        except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
        filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5183 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5183

 To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to provide a sunset for certain 
ways in which credit unions may be Agent members of the National Credit 
            Union Administration Central Liquidity Facility.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2022

Mr. Padilla (for himself and Mr. Cramer) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to provide a sunset for certain 
ways in which credit unions may be Agent members of the National Credit 
            Union Administration Central Liquidity Facility.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AGENT MEMBERSHIP.

    (a) In General.--Section 304(b)(2) of the Federal Credit Union Act 
(12 U.S.C. 1795c(b)(2)) is amended by striking ``all those credit 
unions'' and inserting ``such credit unions as the Board may in its 
discretion determine''.
    (b) Sunset.--
            (1) In general.--Section 304(b)(2) of the Federal Credit 
        Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1795c(b)(2)) is amended by striking ``such 
        credit unions as the Board may in its discretion determine'' 
        and inserting ``all those credit unions''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) 
        shall take effect on December 31, 2027.
                                 <all>
```
Workshop Breakout 

Sessions 

Maria E. Schwartz

Concerns Resolution Branch

Office of Enforcement

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Organization of Sessions

• Five breakout sessions over the next three days• Each divided into three groups by the various 

type of licensee or an individual’s interest:

– Fuel Cycle Facilities, New Construction-Reactors, 

Power Reactors

– Materials/Industrial– Materials/Medical

• Composed of panel members from a specific 

background and members of the audience whobased on their backgrounds or interest, wish to participate in one of the three groups
Example Breakout Session

• Common Definition of Safety Culture• Breakout Session 1: 

– Purpose of the breakout session is to begin 

discussion on the definition of safety culture

– Desired outcome of the breakout session is t

arrive at a definition that panel members can bring back to discuss at the next plenary session

– Provides NRC’s and INPO’s definitions of 

safety culture as starting point of dicussion

– Provides questions intended to stimulate 

discussion
Topics for Discussion

3⁄4A common definition of safety cultur3⁄4The principles/characteristics/traits 

that are part of a strong, positive safety culture 
How We Will Use the Outcome of 

These Sessions

• To inform the panelists who will take 

information from the breakout session back for additional discussion at the following plenary session

• To reach alignment, or determine 

that alignment can not be reached, for additional discussion at the following plenary session
Additional Use of Information from 

Breakout Sessions

• These discussions, in addition to the 

comments we receive on the draft safety culture policy statement, will help us to have a better understanding of what we need to das we proceed with this initiative
QUESTIONS ??
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 6541 Dir ID: 2015 - NM - 135
§ 207.8 Management cost funding oversight. ( a ) *General.* The grantee has primary responsibility for grants management activities and accountability of funds provided for management costs as required by 2 CFR parts 200 and 3002, especially 2 CFR 200.301-200.304 and 200.317-200.326. The grantee is responsible for ensuring that subgrantees meet all program and administrative requirements.
( b ) *Period of availability.* ( 1 ) For major disaster declarations, the grantee may expend management cost funds for allowable costs for a maximum of 8 years from the date of the major disaster declaration or 180 days after the latest performance period date of a non-management cost PA PW or HMGP project narrative, respectively, whichever is sooner.
( 2 ) For emergency declarations, the grantee may expend management cost funds for allowable costs for a maximum of 2 years from the date of the emergency declaration or 180 days after the latest performance period of a non-management cost PA PW, whichever is sooner.
( 3 ) The period of availability may be extended only at the written request of the grantee, with the recommendation of the Regional Administrator, and with the approval of the Chief Financial Officer. The grantee must include a justification in its request for an extension, and must demonstrate that there is work in progress that can be completed within the extended period of availability. In no case will an extended period of availability allow more than 180 days after the expiration of any performance period extensions granted under PA or HMGP for project completion. FEMA will deobligate any funds not liquidated by the grantee in accordance with 2 CFR 200.309 and 200.343(b).
( c ) *Reporting requirements.* The grantee must provide quarterly progress reports on management cost funds to the Regional Administrator as required by the FEMA-State Agreement.
( d ) *Closeout.* The grantee has primary responsibility for the closeout tasks associated with both the program and subgrantee requirements. Complying with each program's performance period requirement, the grantee must conduct final inspections for projects, reconcile subgrantee expenditures, resolve negative audit findings, obtain final reports from subgrantees and reconcile the closeout activities of subgrantees with PA and HMGP grant awards.
( e ) *Audit requirements.* Uniform audit requirements in 2 CFR 200.500-200.520 apply to all assistance provided under this part.
( f ) *Document retention.* In compliance with State law and procedures and with 2 CFR 200.333-200.337, grantees must retain records, including source documentation to support expenditures/costs incurred for management costs, for 3 years from the date of submission of the final Financial Status Report to FEMA that is required for PA and HMGP. The grantee is responsible for resolving questioned costs that may result from audit findings during the 3-year-record-retention period and returning any disallowed costs from ineligible activities.
[72 FR 57875, Oct. 11, 2007, as amended at 79 FR 76086, Dec. 19, 2014]
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-13-0000058 

17-SEP-2014 

02:21 PM 

SCWC-13-0000058
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

SHIRLEY PISO PICO,


Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant,
 

vs.
 

KAPIOLANI MEDICAL CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN,

nka HAWAI'I PACIFIC HEALTH,

Respondent/Defendant-Appellee. 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-13-0000058; CASE NO. AB2012-347)
 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI


(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant Shirley Piso Pico’s
 

Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on August 5, 2014, is
 

hereby rejected. 


DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, September 17, 2014. 

Shirley Piso Pico

pro se
 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 36158

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JESUS VASQUEZ SANCHEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2010 Unpublished Opinion No. 532

Filed: June 28, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Ronald J. Wilper, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of life with thirty-five years 

determinate for first degree murder, and fourteen-year concurrent determinate 

sentence for grand theft, affirmed.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Chief Judge, GRATTON, Judge

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Jesus Vasquez Sanchez was convicted of first degree murder, Idaho Code §§ 18-4001, 

18-4002, 18-4003, and grand theft, I.C. §§ 18-2403, 18-2407(1) and 18-2409. The district court 

imposed a unified sentence of life with thirty-five years determinate for first degree murder, and 

a fourteen-year concurrent determinate sentence for grand theft. Sanchez appeals, contending 

that the sentences are excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Sanchez’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
#### § 402.1 Shipments from the United States.

Transportation Order T-1 applies to shipments from the United States, as well as to shipments from foreign ports, on American flag ships and aircraft.
No: II-23-015 May 9, 2023 

Contact: Dave Gasperson, 404-997-4417 

NRC Schedules Meeting to Discuss Safety Performance of NFS Erwin Facility

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a May 18 public meeting with Nuclear Fuel 

Services to discuss the results of the agency’s licensee performance review of the company’s 

nuclear fuel fabrication plant located in Erwin, Tennessee. 

The event is scheduled to run from 6:30-8 p.m. at the Unicoi County Courthouse, 

100 N. Main Avenue in Erwin. Members of the public and media unable to attend in person can 

view the meeting and presentation on Teams. The telephone conference number for those without 

access to Teams is 301-576-2978, passcode 970628385#. 

The meeting will begin with a short presentation from the NRC staff responsible for the 

inspections at the facility, followed by a question-and-answer session. The NRC staff will be 

available to answer questions about the agency’s two-year review of the facility. 

The NRC assessed performance at the NFS facility from Jan. 1, 2021, through 

Dec. 31, 2022, in safety operations, safeguards, radiological controls, facility support, and other 

areas. The NRC staff review found that NFS continued to conduct its activities safely and met NRC 

requirements for protecting workers, nearby residents, and the environment. 

A copy of the NRC letter to the company about the performance is available on the NRC 

website.
rton_ex109.htm

EXHIBIT 10.9

 

 

 

 

	 
	1
	
	 




 

 

	 
	2
	
	 




 

 

	 
	3
	
	 




 

 

	 
	4
	
	 




 

 

	 
	5
	
	 




 

 

	 
	6
	
	 




 

 

	 
	7
	
	 




 

 

	 
	8
	
	 




 

 

	 
	9
	
	 




 

 

	 
	10
#### § 25.1 Uniform relocation assistance and real property acquisition.

Regulations and procedures for complying with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91-646, 84 Stat. 1894, 42 U.S.C. 4601), as amended by the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 (title IV of Pub. L. 100-17, 101 Stat. 246-256, 42 U.S.C. 4601 note) are set forth in 49 CFR part 24.

[52 FR 48026, Dec. 17, 1987 and 54 FR 8912, Mar. 2, 1989]
§ 206.432 Federal grant assistance. ( a ) *General.* This section describes the extent of Federal funding available under the State's grant, as well as limitations and special procedures applicable to each.
( b ) *Amounts of assistance.* The total Federal contribution of funds is based on the estimated aggregate grant amount to be made under the Stafford Act for the major disaster (less associated administrative costs), and must be as follows: ( 1 ) *Standard percentages.* Not to exceed 15 percent for the first $2,000,000,000 or less of such amounts; not to exceed 10 percent of the portion of such amounts over $2,000,000,000 and not more than $10,000,000,000; and not to exceed 7.5 percent of the portion of such amounts over $10,000,000,000 and not more than $35,333,000,000.
( 2 ) *Twenty (20) percent.* A State with an approved Enhanced State Mitigation Plan, in effect before the disaster declaration, which meets the requirements outlined in § 201.5 of this subchapter will be eligible for assistance under the HMGP not to exceed 20 percent of such amounts, for amounts not more than $35.333 billion.
( 3 ) The estimates of Federal assistance under this paragraph (b) will be based on the Regional Administrator's estimate of all eligible costs, actual grants, and appropriate mission assignments.
( c ) *Cost sharing.* All mitigation measures approved under the State's grant will be subject to the cost sharing provisions established in the FEMA-State Agreement. FEMA may contribute up to 75 percent of the cost of measures approved for funding under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program for major disasters declared on or after June 10, 1993. The non-Federal share may exceed the Federal share. FEMA will not contribute to costs above the Federally approved estimate.
[55 FR 35537, Aug. 30, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 24356, May 11, 1994; 67 FR 8853, Feb. 26, 2002; 67 FR 61515, Oct. 1, 2002; 69 FR 55097, Sept. 13, 2004; 72 FR 61750, Oct. 31, 2007; 74 FR 47482, Sept. 16, 2009; 86 FR 50677, Sept. 10, 2021]
#### § 312.1 Purpose.

The purpose of the regulations in this part is to prescribe the terms and conditions under which civil defense personnel, materials, and facilities, supported in whole or in part through contributions under the Federal Civil Defense Act of 1950, as amended, 50 U.S.C. App. 2251, *et seq.,* hereinafter referred to as “the Act”, may be used for natural disasters, to the extent that such usage is consistent with, contributes to, and does not detract from attack-related civil defense preparedness.
### §208. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–28, title VIII, §8103(c)(1)(A), May 25, 2007, 121 Stat. 189

Section, acts June 25, 1938, ch. 676, §8, 52 Stat. 1064; Oct. 26, 1949, ch. 736, §8, 63 Stat. 915; Aug. 12, 1955, ch. 867, §§4, 5(b)–(e), 69 Stat. 711, 712; Pub. L. 85–750, Aug. 25, 1958, 72 Stat. 844; Pub. L. 87–30, §7, May 5, 1961, 75 Stat. 70; Pub. L. 93–259, §5(c)(1), (d), Apr. 8, 1974, 88 Stat. 58; Pub. L. 95–151, §2(d)(3), Nov. 1, 1977, 91 Stat. 1246; Pub. L. 101–157, §4(c), Nov. 17, 1989, 103 Stat. 940; Pub. L. 101–583, §1, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2871, related to wage orders in American Samoa.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 60 days after May 25, 2007, see section 8103(c)(2) of Pub. L. 110–28, set out as an Effective Date of 2007 Amendment note under section 206 of this title.
#### Samuel P. Ainslie, Respondent, v. Walker B. Lounsbery, as Mayor of the City of Binghamton, et al., Appellants.

*730Present — -Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Santry and Bergan, JJ. [See *post,*p. 865.]
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-40   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 1 of 3

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-40   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 2 of 3

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-40   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 3 of 3