alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-211 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, October 4, 1999)

NRC CONSIDERS CHANGES TO REGULATIONS

FOR REACTOR SAFETY ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is considering a rule

change that would facilitate the process for utilities which seek

small increases -- usually on the order of one percent -- to the

authorized power level for nuclear power plants without

compromising safety.

The result of the rule change would permit a utility to use

its existing analyses of a plant’s emergency core cooling system

as a basis for safe operation at increased power, rather than

prepare a new analysis that might cost several million dollars.

Such a move, NRC believes, would eliminate an unnecessary

regulatory burden without compromising safety.

At present, most licensees analyze emergency core cooling

system capabilities assuming that the reactor would be operating

at 102 percent power if a loss-of-coolant accident occurred.

This requirement, applied since 1974, was intended to provide

additional safety margin to assure adequate emergency cooling.

It was believed necessary because of uncertainties in the

accuracy of reactor power measurement.

Instrumentation is now available that can measure reactor

power levels more precisely and, NRC believes, can eliminate the

need for the current 102 percent power level assumption. NRC

already has granted an exemption from this requirement to one

utility using such updated technology.

The proposed action, which is being issued for public

comment, would amend the current requirement in Appendix K, Part

50, of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Other

provisions are in a Federal Register notice published October 1.
Interested persons are invited to submit comments by

December 15 to the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attention:

Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Comments may also be

submitted electronically through the NRC website at:

http://ruleforum.llnl.gov/cgi-bin/rulemake.

##
#### Domestic Dryer Corporation v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Louis Halle; Brooklyn Union Gas Company.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan; JJ.
### Swanson, Brian (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject: Good morning, Patti Brennan <patti.brennan@maxithc.com> Tuesday, July 31, 2012 11:53 AM Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) Air Service to Rhinelander, WI 

## Dol- OS.T- 2pH-O\oq

As avery frequent flyer, the Rhinelander airport has been nice enough to keep me posted on the situation ofobtaining a new carrier. Iwould SO appreciate SkyWest coming into serve RHI to MSP. Past experience with Great Lakes when they served the airport was that they were not reliable enough to get us frequent flyers to where we needed to go, in this case.MSP to get to other destinations. There are currently at least 6 of us that fly out on Sunday or Monday and return on Fridays for ourjobs. We would preferto fly to MSP ratherthat Chicago. Currently we are all commuting 1-1/2 to 2 hours or more to CWA. Having service back in Rhinelanderto MSP would greatly help us all. Thank you foryourtime. Patti Brennan**(~~)nS!Jlr0nt** 1**..:..::.....:.~"-'-'-""-'-'-"'-'-'"""==** 17.l367.2c82 i patti.brennan@maxithc.com Focebook : 1
..·;'J Linkedin**Profe::sitJ(~u!** Together
...Making Healthcare Better!

1 0 

### .c
#### Ada M. Hall and Edward F. Hall, Respondents, v. Arthur G. Hall, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
EXHIBIT
      23




**CONSENT
      OF AUDITORS TO INCORPORATE**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS INTO FORM S-8**





















Exhibit
      23














CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
      333-105598 on Form S-8 pertaining to the AJS Bancorp, Inc. 2003 Stock Option
      Plan and the 2003 Recognition and Retention Plan of our report dated March
      7,
      2007 on the consolidated financial statements of AJS Bancorp, Inc., which report
      is included in Form 10-K of AJS Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
      2006.














/s/
                Crowe Chizek and Company LLCCrowe
                Chizek and Company LLC





Oak
      Brook, Illinois


March
      22,
      2007
No: 23-004 January 24, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Proposing Revision to Generic Environmental Impact Statement 

for Renewing Reactor Licenses

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has directed the staff to publish a proposed rule that 

includes an update to the license renewal Generic Environmental Impact Statement the agency 

uses when considering applications to renew operating reactor licenses. 

The proposed rule, to appear in the Federal Register in the near future, responds to a 

Commission order that concluded the license renewal GEIS did not analyze the environmental 

impacts of a subsequent license renewal term (from 60 to 80 years of operation). The proposed 

rule amends the relevant rule language to account for intial license renewal and one term of 

subsequent license renewal, redefines the number and scope of the environmental issues that 

must be addressed during the review of each application for license renewal, and updates related 

guidance to fully address subsequent renewal. Following publication of the proposed rule, the 

NRC will hold public meetings to gather comments before finalizing the rule and license renewal 

GEIS for Commission consideration. 

The license renewal GEIS covers environmental topics relevant to all nuclear power plant 

licensees seeking renewed licenses. The revised document accounts for new or revised 

environmental impacts and applies what the agency has learned during previous license 

renewals. The revised document also clarifies which specific environmental issues are resolved 

generically by the license renewal GEIS and which require site-specific review.
<PAGE>

                                                                       EXHIBIT 8

                        LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

The following table lists the Registrant's significant subsidiaries, as defined
in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X, as at December 31, 2003. The table includes
the legal name of the subsidiary, its jurisdiction of incorporation and the name
under which it does business. The table omits certain holding companies.

<TABLE>
<S>                        <C>                      <C>
   COMPANY NAME           JURISDICTION OF           NAME UNDER WHICH IT IS
                           INCORPORATION                DOING BUSINESS

   CESKY MOBIL            Czech Republic                     Oskar
   a.s.

   MOBIFON S.A.               Romania                        Connex
</TABLE>
#### F. Augustus Heinze, Appellant, v. Assets Realization Company, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. *953Mo opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32
 
 
 Certification
Pursuant to
 18
U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as
Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 This
certification is not deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and does not constitute a part of the Annual Report of
Hypercom Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”).
 
 In
connection with the Report, we, Philippe Tartavull, as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and Robert M. Vreeland, as Interim Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
respectively, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
      March 16, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/ Philippe TartavullPhilippe
      TartavullChief
      Executive OfficerDated:
      March 16, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/ Robert M. VreelandRobert
      M. VreelandInterim
      Chief Financial
Officer
HomeAbout NRCFire ProtectionRelated Information

# Bulletins Related to Fire Protection

Bulletins inform addressees of recently identified "urgent" safety issues, may request information and/or action, and require written responses under oath or affirmation. The following table lists (in chronological order) the bulletins that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued regarding topics related to fire protection for licensed facilities and materials. The complete collection of NRC bulletins is available through the NRC Library.

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 10 CFR Part 50
          - Guidelines for FP in NPPs
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Procedures
          - Administrative Letters
          - Bulletins
          - Circulars
          - Generic Letters
          - Information Notices
          - Regulatory Issue Summaries
          - Regulatory Guides
          - Commission (SECY) Papers
          - Generic Issues
          - Staff-Prepared NUREGs
          - Contractor-Prepared NUREGs
          - Conference Proceedings
          - Brochures
          - FAQs About Fire Protection

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020
### Part E—Administration

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition of "Secretary"

In this part, "Secretary" means the Secretary of Labor, see section 3151(b)(1)(C)(ii)(II) of this title.
### §504a. Associate Attorney General

The President may appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, an Associate Attorney General.

(Added Pub. L. 95–139, §1(a), Oct. 19, 1977, 91 Stat. 1171.)
No: II-23-005 April 5, 2023 

Contact: Dave Gasperson 404-997-4417 

NRC Schedules Public Meeting to Discuss

H.B. Robinson Nuclear Power Plant 2022 Safety Performance

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss the 2022 safety performance of the 

H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant during a public meeting scheduled for April 12. The single-unit 

Robinson plant is located near Hartsville, South Carolina, and operated by Duke Energy. 

The event will run from 6-7 p.m. Eastern time, at the Hartsville Library, 147 W. College 

Avenue in Hartsville. NRC employees responsible for plant inspections, including the resident 

inspectors based full-time at the site, will be available to answer questions at the meeting. 

NRC resident inspectors and other specialist inspectors from the NRC Region II office in 

Atlanta perform inspections at the Robinson plant. They concluded that Robinson operated safely 

during 2022 and all inspection findings and performance indicators were green or of very low safety 

significance. As a result, the plant remains under the NRC’s normal level of oversight, which entails 

thousands of hours of inspection each year. 

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or 

performance indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC 

oversight. 

The annual assessment letter and the meeting notice are available on the NRC website. 

Current performance information for the plant is available and updated quarterly.
#### § 123.6 What does SBA look for when considering a disaster loan applicant?

There must be reasonable assurance that you can repay your loan based on SBA's analysis of your credit or your personal or business cash flow, and you must also have satisfactory character. SBA will not make a loan to you if repayment depends upon the sale of collateral through foreclosure or any other disposition of assets owned by you. SBA is prohibited by statute from making a loan to you if you are engaged in the production or distribution of any product or service that has been determined to be obscene by a court.

[61 FR 3304, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 79 FR 22862, Apr. 25, 2014]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 200 (Monday, October 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23198]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Minority Veterans; Notice of Availability 
of Report

    In compliance with section 13 of Public Law 92-463 (Federal 
Advisory Committee Act) notice is hereby given that the 2004 Annual 
Report of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Advisory Committee on 
Minority Veterans has been issued. The report summarizes activities and 
recommendations of the Committee on matters relative to VA programs and 
policies affecting minority veterans. It is available for public 
inspection at two locations:

Mr. Richard Yarnall, Federal Advisory Committee Desk, Library of 
Congress, Anglo-American Acquisition Division, Government Documents 
Section, Room LM-B42, 101 Independence Avenue, SE., Washington DC 
20540-4172; and
Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Minority Veterans, Suite 
435, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20420.

    Dated: September 28, 2004.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-23198 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 11

- 00239

- CV

In the MATTER OF L.K.T.S. , A Child

From the 289th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009

- JUV

- 02048B

Honorable Carmen Kelsey , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 18, 2011

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

P. 42.1(a)(1). No c osts shall be assessed against appellant because she is indigent. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 20.1.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 594 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 594

  To double the existing penalties for the provision of misleading or 
             inaccurate caller identification information.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 4, 2021

   Ms. Collins (for herself, Ms. Sinema, Mr. Hawley, and Mr. Peters) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To double the existing penalties for the provision of misleading or 
             inaccurate caller identification information.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Anti-Spoofing Penalties 
Modernization Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. INCREASING PENALTIES FOR SPOOFERS.

     Section 227(e)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
227(e)(5)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)(i)--
                    (A) by striking ``$10,000'' and inserting 
                ``$20,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$2,000,000''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``$10,000'' and 
        inserting ``$20,000''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 8351.2 Rivers.
#### Alfred W. Grote, Respondent, v. Progressive Hotel Company, Inc., Appellant.

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-40457, 333-40459, 333-40461, 333-40333, 333-43622, 333-67440,
333-97181 and 333-97179) pertaining to the various stock issuance programs; and
in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-68202, 333-86440 and
333-108521) of Hypercom Corporation of our report dated February 6, 2004, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Hypercom
Corporation in included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2003.


                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 12, 2004
----

----

III Tiedotteita

Euroopan elintarviketurvallisuusviranomainen

----

EUROOPAN ELINTARVIKETURVALLISUUSVIRANOMAISEN TIEDEKOMITEAN TAI TIEDELAUTAKUNTIEN JÄSENYYTTÄ KOSKEVA KIINNOSTUKSENILMAISUPYYNTÖ

(Kiinnostuksenilmaisupyynnön määräaikaa on jatkettu 17. helmikuuta 2006 saakka)

(2006/C 18 A/01)

Marraskuun 22 päivänä 2005 ilmestyneen Euroopan unionin virallisen lehden C 289 A (s. 6) mukaan hakemukset on toimitettava viimeistään 7. tammikuuta 2006. Online-hakemuksissa etenkin hakuajan viimeisen viikon aikana todennäköisesti toistuvien ongelmien takia kiinnostuksenilmaisupyyntöjen määräaikaa on jatkettu perjantaihin 17. helmikuuta 2006 saakka.

Tämä pyyntö on suunnattu tieteenharjoittajille, jotka ovat kiinnostuneita jäsenyydestä Euroopan elintarviketurvallisuusviranomaisen tiedekomiteassa tai jossakin sen tiedelautakunnassa. Viranomainen on perustettu 28 päivänä tammikuuta 2002 annetulla Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetuksella (EY) N:o 178/2002 elintarvikelainsäädäntöä koskevista yleisistä periaatteista ja vaatimuksista, Euroopan elintarviketurvallisuusviranomaisen (EFSA) perustamisesta sekä elintarvikkeiden turvallisuuteen liittyvistä menettelyistä. Viranomaisen toimipaikka on Parmassa, Italiassa.

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.1109 Discovery and oral hearings.

Discovery will not be permitted and oral hearings will not be held.
### Subpart B—Other Requirements
### §2673. Reports to Congress

The head of each federal agency shall report annually to Congress all claims paid by it under section 2672 of this title, stating the name of each claimant, the amount claimed, the amount awarded, and a brief description of the claim.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 983.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §922 (Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, §404, 60 Stat. 843).

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal

Pub. L. 89–348, §1(1), Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1310, repealed the requirement that an annual report to Congress be made of the administrative adjustment of tort claims of $2,500 or less, stating the name of each claimant, the amount claimed, the amount awarded, and a brief description of the claim.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-81163-CIV-MATTHEWMAN

JEFFREY LAGRASSO and

DEBORAH LAGRASSO,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

SEVEN BRIDGES HOMEOWNERS 

ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFFS’ PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLAIM PURSUANT TO 

THEIR DISPARATE TREATMENT THEORY OF

COUNT I [DE 233]

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion For Partial Summary 

Judgment As To Plaintiffs’ Punitive Damages Claim Pursuant To Their Disparate Treatment 

Theory Of Count I (“Motion”) [DE 233]. Plaintiffs responded [DE 234], and Defendant replied

[DE 235]. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ filings, the entire record, and the governing 

law, the Motion [DE 233] is DENIED. 

Plaintiffs brought this action for alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. § 3604(b) of the Fair 

Housing Act against the Association claiming discrimination on the basis of their religion in their 

ability to use services or facilities of the Association, and by the Association’s inaction to control 

the conduct of their neighbor. [DE 1; DE 118]. Count I alleges disparate treatment 

discrimination and Plaintiffs have sought punitive damages in connection with that claim. Id. 

The prior presiding Judge found that the record contained “adequate circumstantial 

evidence to allow a jury to reasonably infer that Defendant discriminated against Plaintiffs in 

part due to their status as Christians, or at least as non-Jewish community members.” [DE 188 at 

Case 9:20-cv-81163-WM Document 236 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

3]. As that theory of Count I has survived summary judgment, Plaintiffs’ demand for punitive 

damages as to that claim has also survived summary judgment. Moreover, Defendant failed to 

sufficiently show that it timely moved for summary judgment on this issue or that any prior 

Court order clearly and unequivocally states that punitive damages as to the remaining disparate 

treatment theory is unavailable. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion [DE 233] is DENIED.

ORDERED and ADJUDGED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, 

Florida, this 21st day of December 2021.

_________________________________

William Matthewman

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 9:20-cv-81163-WM Document 236 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2021 Page 2 of 2