alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Continental Distilling Sales Company, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Famous Wines & Liquors, Inc., Respondent.

First Department,

June 21, 1948.

*714*Horace 8. Manges*of counsel *(Jacob F. Raskin*with him on the brief; *Weil, Gotslial & Manges,*attorneys), for appellant.

*Julian Jawits*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The complaint alleges that plaintiff is the exclusive sales agent for the State of New York of alcoholic beverages produced by the distiller under brand names; that plaintiff’s predecessor and assignor was authorized by the distiller to fix minimum resale prices and enter into agreements with retailers in the State of New York pursuant to the New York Fair Trade Law (General Business Law, art. XXIV-A); that plaintiff’s predecessor and assignor entered into such an agreement with defendant, which agreement is still in full force and effect; that plaintiff has been authorized by the distiller to fix minimum resale prices and enter into agreements with retailers in the State of New York pursuant to the New York Fair Trade Law, and to take all measures necessary to enforce pre-existing agreements. The complaint asks that defendant be enjoined from selling the beverages involved at less than the minimum retail prices stipulated.

The court at Special Term granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency on the ground that only the owner of the brand name business, and not an exclusive sales agent, may designate resale prices under the Fair Trade Law.

We do not read the statute as being so limited in its contemplation. No such limitation is expressed in the statute or implicit in its purpose. We think that an exclusive sales agent, authorized by the owner, is entitled under the law to designate resale prices and exercise the authority granted by the law. The complaint here is substantially similar to the complaint in *Bourjois Sales Corp.*v. *Dorfman*(273 N. Y. 167) and is sufficient.

*715The order appealed from should be reversed) with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion denied, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of order with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs.

Peck,P. J., Dobe, Callahan and Shientag, JJ., concur; Cohn, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Order reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion denied, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. Settle order on notice.
§ 19.545 Pre-employment inquiries. ( a ) *Marital status.* A recipient shall not make pre-employment inquiry as to the marital status of an applicant for employment, including whether such applicant is “Miss” or “Mrs.”
( b ) *Sex.* A recipient may make pre-employment inquiry as to the sex of an applicant for employment, but only if such inquiry is made equally of such applicants of both sexes and if the results of such inquiry are not used in connection with discrimination prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-45 April 28, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC, VA MEDICAL CENTER IN WILMINGTON, DELAWARE,

TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS OF AGENCY REQUIREMENTS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet on Thursday,

May 1, with officials from the Veterans Administration Medical

Center in Wilmington, Delaware, to discuss apparent violations of

agency requirements involving radioactive medical services at the

facility. The predecisional enforcement conference will begin at

10 a.m. in the public meeting room at NRC Region 1 offices in

King of Prussia, Pa.

The meeting will be open to the public for observation only.

Five apparent violations were identified during an

inspection of the center conducted on March 26. They include:

failure to prepare written directives prior to the administration

of radioactive medical treatments; failure to conduct reviews to

verify compliance with all aspects of the quality management

program at intervals of no greater than 12 months; failure to

measure each six months the ventilation rates available in areas

where radioactive gas is used; failure of the center's Radiation

Safety Committee to meet at least quarterly; and failure to

establish a quorum at Radiation Safety Committee meetings.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference

does not mean the NRC has determined a violation has occurred or

that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety

significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity to

point out any errors that may have been made in NRC inspection

reports; and to enable the licensee to outline its proposed

corrective actions.

No decisions on the apparent violations will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later time.

#
§ 305.3 Application requirements. ( a ) Each application for Public Works Investment Assistance must: ( 1 ) Include evidence of eligibility, as provided in part 301 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Include, or incorporate by reference, a CEDS (as provided in § 303.7 of this chapter);
( 3 ) Demonstrate how the proposed Project meets the criteria of § 305.2; and
( 4 ) Demonstrate how the proposed Project meets the application evaluation criteria set forth in § 301.8 of this chapter.
( b ) The Investment Rate for Public Works Investments will be determined in accordance with § 301.4 of this chapter.
[71 FR 56675, Sept. 27, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 4264, Jan. 27, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            7039
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           14745
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      35415
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         200949
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  265709
<DEPOSITS>                                      170834
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1477
<LONG-TERM>                                      11618
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                       81717
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  265709
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  17712
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1256
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  1682
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 20650
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                7470
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8144
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            12506
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  22
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   6340
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7506
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        7506
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5096
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.47
<LOANS-NON>                                       4410
<LOANS-PAST>                                       396
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   236
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1716
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      188
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1728
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1728
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 61.1 Purpose of part.

This part describes the types of properties eligible for flood insurance coverage under the Program, the limits of such coverage, and the premium rates actually to be paid by insureds.

[85 FR 43957, July 20, 2020]
#### §§ 136.152-136.159 [Reserved]
§ 113.405 Housing. ( a ) *Generally.* A recipient shall not, on the basis of sex, apply different rules or regulations, impose different fees or requirements, or offer different services or benefits related to housing, except as provided in this section (including housing provided only to married students).
( b ) *Housing provided by recipient.* ( 1 ) A recipient may provide separate housing on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) Housing provided by a recipient to students of one sex, when compared to that provided to students of the other sex, shall be as a whole: ( i ) Proportionate in quantity to the number of students of that sex applying for such housing; and
( ii ) Comparable in quality and cost to the student.
( c ) *Other housing.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall not, on the basis of sex, administer different policies or practices concerning occupancy by its students of housing other than that provided by such recipient.
( 2 ) ( i ) A recipient which, through solicitation, listing, approval of housing, or otherwise, assists any agency, organization, or person in making housing available to any of its students, shall take such reasonable action as may be necessary to assure itself that such housing as is provided to students of one sex, when compared to that provided to students of the other sex, is as a whole: ( A ) Proportionate in quantity; and
( B ) Comparable in quality and cost to the student.
( ii ) A recipient may render such assistance to any agency, organization, or person that provides all or part of such housing to students of only one sex.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 96-40 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson June 12, 1996

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

NRC PROPOSES TO FINE TORRINGTON'S COMMUNITY HOSPITAL $2,500

FOR NUCLEAR MEDICINE ERRORS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $2,500 civil penalty against Community

Hospital, Torrington, Wyoming, for failure to implement required quality assurance measures and

for falsifying records.

The failures led to overdoses of radioactive drugs for two patients that went undiscovered for

more than a year. The hospital and an independent medical consultant hired by the NRC

concluded that health risks to the patients from the overdoses were negligible.

The two patients received doses of radioactive sodium iodide on

September 6 and November 7, 1994, that were 30 percent and 40 percent greater than the doses

prescribed by their doctors. The errors were not discovered until an NRC inspection was

completed on February 26 of this year. The NRC also determined that the medical technician who

made the errors deliberately falsified hospital records indicating that the doses given to the patients

were as prescribed by their doctors.

NRC Regional Administrator L. Joe Callan said in a letter to the hospital administrator:

"Although the actual consequences to the patients may have been negligible, this case is of

significant regulatory concern in that the hospital did not implement a Quality Management

Program which was effective in ensuring that radioactive material was administered in accordance

with authorized users' instructions and that deviations . . . were not promptly identified and

corrected."

When the errors were discovered, Community Hospital immediately

suspended nuclear medicine procedures involving sodium iodide and subsequently decided to

terminate its NRC license to perform nuclear medicine. A mobile service provider is now

performing nuclear medicine at the hospital. As a corrective measure, the hospital also reviewed

its policies and procedures and took disciplinary action against the medical technician involved.

Community Hospital has 30 days to pay the fine or file a protest.

####
#### Edwin G. Burke, Plaintiff, v. Gustave Brown, Appellant, and Julia F. Gilbert, Defendant-Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, TJntermyer. and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part. [180 Misc. 903.]
### §103. Minnesota

Minnesota constitutes one judicial district comprising six divisions.

(1) The First Division comprises the counties of Dodge, Fillmore, Houston, Mower, Olmsted, Steele, Wabasha, and Winona.

Court for the First Division shall be held at Winona.

(2) The Second Division comprises the counties of Blue Earth, Brown, Cottonwood, Faribault, Freeborn, Jackson, Lac qui Parle, Le Sueur, Lincoln, Lyon, Martin, Murray, Nicollet, Nobles, Pipestone, Redwood, Rock, Sibley, Waseca, Watonwan, and Yellow Medicine.

Court for the Second Division shall be held at Mankato.

(3) The Third Division comprises the counties of Chisago, Dakota, Goodhue, Ramsey, Rice, Scott, and Washington.

Court for the Third Division shall be held at Saint Paul.

(4) The Fourth Division comprises the counties of Anoka, Carver, Chippewa, Hennepin, Isanti, Kandiyohi, McLeod, Meeker, Renville, Sherburne, Swift, and Wright.

Court for the Fourth Division shall be held at Minneapolis.

(5) The Fifth Division comprises the counties of Aitkin, Benton, Carlton, Cass, Cook, Crow Wing, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Pine, and Saint Louis.

Court for the Fifth Division shall be held at Duluth.

(6) The Sixth Division comprises the counties of Becker, Beltrami, Big Stone, Clay, Clearwater, Douglas, Grant, Hubbard, Kittson, Lake of the Woods, Mahnomen, Marshall, Norman, Otter Tail, Pennington, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Roseau, Stearns, Stevens, Todd, Traverse, Wadena, and Wilkin.

Court for the Sixth Division shall be held at Fergus Falls and Bemidji.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 882; Pub. L. 110–406, §18, Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4295.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §169 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §89, 36 Stat. 1115; Apr. 10, 1926, ch. 113, 44 Stat. 238).

Provisions relating to the appointment and residence of deputy clerks and the maintenance of offices by them were omitted as covered by section 751 of this title.

The counties of Pennington and Lake of the Woods, in the Sixth Division, were created since the enactment of the Judicial Code.

Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Par. (6). Pub. L. 110–406 inserted "and Bemidji" after "Fergus Falls".
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135492 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, ROBERT CALLAWAY, Justices 

Plaintiff, 

v SC: 135492 

 AGC: 1734/07 
 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, 

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and 

relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested 

relief. 

d0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
### [§2011. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–295, div. A, title II, §221(a)(95)(A)(i), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4051]

Section, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 374; Feb. 20, 1956, ch. 63, §3, 70 Stat. 24; Pub. L. 85–866, title I, §§65(a), 102(c)(1), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1657, 1674; Pub. L. 86–175, §3, Aug. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 397; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §§1902(a)(12)(B), 1906(b)(13)(A), title XX, §§2001(c)(1)(A), 2004(f)(3), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1806, 1834, 1849, 1872; Pub. L. 97–34, title IV, §422(e)(2), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 316; Pub. L. 107–16, title V, §§531(a), 532(a), June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 72, 73; Pub. L. 107–134, title I, §103(b)(1), Jan. 23, 2002, 115 Stat. 2431, related to credit for State death taxes.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 19, 2014, subject to a savings provision, see section 221(b) of Pub. L. 113–295, set out as an Effective Date of 2014 Amendment note under section 1 of this title.
1 

### Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Dwight Mallory <Dmallory@resoluteenergy.com>

Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 11:51 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah Subject: RE: Latitude/Longitude Coordinates for MCU

Attachments: removed.txt; MCU Main Flare.kmz



### 37°15'33.75"N, 109°12'26.89"W

The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the co rrect file and location. Dwight E. Mallory Environmental/Regulatory Manager Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2800 Denver, CO 80203
Direct: 303-573-4886 X 1165

From: Kelly, Shaheerah [mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 12:44 PM
To: Dwight Mallory Subject: Latitude/Longitude Coordinates for MCU



### Hi Dwight,

Can you send me the lat/long coordinates for the MCU flar e? It would be very helpful to get this info today if possible. Thanks.

************************************ Shaheerah Kelly Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3)

U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, Region 9 San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: 415-947-4156
Fax: 415-947-3579
Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

This e-mail message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, privile ged, and proprietary information of Resolute Energy Corporation. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution may be prohibi ted under law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply E-mail of any erroneous transmission, and destroy the original E-mail, any attach ments, and all copies of the original message. Thank you.
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Richard E. Stoddard, Chief Executive Officer of Kaiser Ventures LLC (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1. The amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                         
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: December 2, 2004 |  | /s/ Richard E. Stoddard                 
|                       |  | Richard E. Stoddard                     
|                       |  | Chairman of the Board, President and CEO



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# ORM)

'' Pl f

# 'AL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTAk

# ED PR 20-0005
IN RE THE MOTION OF CHAD DANIEL BERNARD FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

### SEP 0 I 

# an Bowan C3reertwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Chad Daniel Bernard has filed a motion for admission to the Bar ofthe State of Montana pursuant to Rule V ofthe Rules for Admission,Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Bernard hasprovided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirernents prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator,Chad Daniel Bernard may be sworn in to the practice oflaw in the State of Montana. Arrangements for swearing in rnay be madeby contacting the office ofthe Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this
— day ofSeptember,2020. ChiefJustice 09/01/2020

Case Number: PR 20-0005
#### § 107.1720 Characteristics of SBA's guarantee.

If SBA agrees to guarantee a Licensee's Debentures or Participating Securities, such guarantee will be unconditional, irrespective of the validity, regularity or enforceability of the Debentures or Participating Securities or any other circumstances which might constitute a legal or equitable discharge or defense of a guarantor. Pursuant to its guarantee, SBA will make timely payments of principal and interest on the Debentures or the Redemption Price of and Prioritized Payments on the Participating Securities.

[63 FR 5873, Feb. 5, 1998]