alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 19.230 Transition plans. ( a ) *Submission of plans.* An institution to which § 19.225 applies and that is composed of more than one administratively separate unit may submit either a single transition plan applicable to all such units, or a separate transition plan applicable to each such unit.
( b ) *Content of plans.* In order to be approved by the Secretary of Education, a transition plan shall: ( 1 ) State the name, address, and Federal Interagency Committee on Education Code of the educational institution submitting such plan, the administratively separate units to which the plan is applicable, and the name, address, and telephone number of the person to whom questions concerning the plan may be addressed. The person who submits the plan shall be the chief administrator or president of the institution, or another individual legally authorized to bind the institution to all actions set forth in the plan.
( 2 ) State whether the educational institution or administratively separate unit admits students of both sexes as regular students and, if so, when it began to do so.
( 3 ) Identify and describe with respect to the educational institution or administratively separate unit any obstacles to admitting students without discrimination on the basis of sex.
( 4 ) Describe in detail the steps necessary to eliminate as soon as practicable each obstacle so identified and indicate the schedule for taking these steps and the individual directly responsible for their implementation.
( 5 ) Include estimates of the number of students, by sex, expected to apply for, be admitted to, and enter each class during the period covered by the plan.
( c ) *Nondiscrimination.* No policy or practice of a recipient to which § 19.225 applies shall result in treatment of applicants to or students of such recipient in violation of §§ 19.300 through 19.310 unless such treatment is necessitated by an obstacle identified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section and a schedule for eliminating that obstacle has been provided as required by paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
( d ) *Effects of past exclusion.* To overcome the effects of past exclusion of students on the basis of sex, each educational institution to which § 19.225 applies shall include in its transition plan, and shall implement, specific steps designed to encourage individuals of the previously excluded sex to apply for admission to such institution. Such steps shall include instituting recruitment programs that emphasize the institution's commitment to enrolling students of the sex previously excluded.
-cr-06216-LSS Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2000 P
-cr-06216-LSS Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2000 P
-cr-06216-LSS Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2000 P
-cr-06216-LSS Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2000 P
-cr-06216-LSS Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2000 P
§ 204.26 Appeal of fire management assistance declaration denial. ( a ) *Submitting an appeal.* When a State's request for a fire management assistance declaration is denied, the Governor or GAR may appeal the decision in writing within 30 days after the date of the letter denying the request. The State should submit this one-time request for reconsideration in writing, with appropriate additional information to the Administrator through the Regional Administrator. The Administrator will reevaluate the State's request and notify the State of the final determination within 90 days of receipt of the appeal or the receipt of additional requested information.
( b ) *Requesting a time-extension.* The Administrator may extend the 30-day period for filing an appeal, provided that the Governor or the GAR submits a written
( c ) *Request for such an extension within the 30-day period.* The Administrator will evaluate the need for an extension based on the reasons cited in the request and either approve or deny the request for an extension.
[75 FR 50715, Aug. 17, 2010]
### §187. Unlawful activities or conduct; right to sue; jurisdiction; limitations; damages

(a) It shall be unlawful, for the purpose of this section only, in an industry or activity affecting commerce, for any labor organization to engage in any activity or conduct defined as an unfair labor practice in section 158(b)(4) of this title.

(b) Whoever shall be injured in his business or property by reason or 1 any violation of subsection (a) may sue therefor in any district court of the United States subject to the limitations and provisions of section 185 of this title without respect to the amount in controversy, or in any other court having jurisdiction of the parties, and shall recover the damages by him sustained and the cost of the suit.

(June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title III, §303, 61 Stat. 158; Pub. L. 86–257, title VII, §704(e), Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 545.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1959—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 86–257 struck out provisions which specified particular practices that were unlawful, and inserted reference to practices defined in section 158(b)(4) of this title, which section defines the unfair labor practices formerly enumerated in this subsection.

1 So in original. Probably should be "of".
October 24, 201~

Kevin D. Schlemmer, Chief

Essential Air Service & Domestic Analysis Division

U.S. Department ofTransportation

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE

Washington, DC 20S90

RE:Order 2013-10-3

Servicing Kalaupapa, Hawaii

Dear Mr. Schlemmer;

As a resident of the Kalaupapa community, I just want to say that we love this company, Makani Kai Air.

Please grant them the Essential Air Service contract for another year! They are friendly, professional and

treat us like they really enjoy servicing our community. They do great things like arriving on time,

providing a ramp for the patients, greeting us all with a warm "aloha", taking care of our luggage,

contacting us when bad weather necessitates the cancelation or rescheduling flights and the list goes

on and on. The planes are always clean as is their main terminal in Honolulu.

After years of less than stellar service with disagreeable management from other air carriers, it is a great

joy to have Makani Kai a part of our community.

I whole heartedly support reissuing of the Essential Air Service contract to Makani Kai Air for servicing

Kalauapapa.

Sincerely,

Jane Claire Cappelle
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                        5
<LEGEND>
              This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted
              from Skynet Telematics,  Inc. March 31, 1999 financial  statements
              and is qualified  in its  entirety by reference to such  financial
              statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                            0000894557
<NAME>                                           Skynet Telematics, Inc.

       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-1999

<CASH>                                                    27
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             11,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               29,104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          44,133
<PP&E>                                                    7,552,329
<DEPRECIATION>                                            (825,555)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            6,770,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     1,470,148
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  22,508
<OTHER-SE>                                                4,995,542
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              6,770,907
<SALES>                                                   13,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          13,050
<CGS>                                                     96,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             96,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          605,031
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        22,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (688,837)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (688,837)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (688,837)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (.03)
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

October 17, 2014

Dustin Fife, San Juan County Library Director

Blanding Library, San Juan County

25 West 300 South

Blanding, UT 84511

Subject: Public documents at the Blanding Library for public inspection

Dear Mr. Fife:

The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency sent you a package containing a number of documents

regarding the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation

near the city ofAneth, San Juan County, Utah. Two of these documents contained an error, and need

to be replaced. Please replace the following documents in the package previously sent to you with

the enclosed documents:

1. PUBLIC INFORMATION SHEET

2. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY IMPACT REPORT & FACT SHEET

Your assistance with this matter is greatly appreciated. Feel free to contact me at (415) 947-4156 or

kelly.shaheerah(Zi~epa.gov if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Shaheerah Kelly, Environmental Engineer

Permits Office

Air Division

Enclosures
456 P.2d 221

#### H. C. CORZINE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., a corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 8876.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

July 8, 1969.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Case No. 270, 80 N.M. 418, 456 P.2d 892 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
#### Felix Salomon and Others, Respondents, v. Cornelius Kahlen, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6805

JEFFREY S. BLANEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus G. F. DRISCOLL, Law Librarian, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-98-1449-AM) Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 27, 2002 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey S. Blaney, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jeffery S. Blaney appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on reasoning of the district court, see Blaney v. Driscoll , No. CA-98-1449-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 18, 2002), noting that because the motion to reconsider was filed more than ten days after entry of the final judgment, the motion only is properly considered under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
0ctober 30, 2015

Mr. Ravinder Singh Virdi

President

Aero Academy International, LLC

308 Grady Montgomery Drive

Jackson, TN 38301

Dear Mr. Virdi:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 141.1 through 141.95 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why 

we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your October 5, 2015, exemption request on behalf Aero Academy International, 

LLC. into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-4113), but we are unable to process your request 

any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 

(copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the 

following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

In addition, the FAA cannot issue an exemption to someone regulated by a state code, in this 

case, Tenn. Code. Ann. § 49-7-2004(10) listed in your petition request.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days from the date of this letter. We will consider the docket on 

your request open during this period. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within the 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

James M. Crotty

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure

Code of Federal Regulation § 11.81
3

Project No.: AXX-xx-xxx-E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM-104:TAdams:xx/xx/xx:Doc#xxxx

ARM-1/100/104:Program Office [or specific OPR routing symbol]

[Insert Stylewriter Score Here]

[INSERT ENVELOPE ADDRESS HERE]
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

** **

We consent to the use of our reports dated March 1, 2012 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TransAlta Corporation as at December 31, 2011 and 2010 and January 1, 2010 and for the two years ended December 31, 2011, included as an exhibit to TransAlta Corporation’s amended Annual Report on Form 40-F/A for 2011, dated October 30, 2012 and with respect to internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, included as an exhibit to TransAlta Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for 2011, dated March 2, 2012.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 

(1)  Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-72454 and No. 333-101470) pertaining to TransAlta Corporation’s Share Option Plan

 

(2)  Registration Statements (Form F-10 No. 333-170465 and No. 333-162418) pertaining to the registration of Debt and Equity Securities of TransAlta Corporation

 

of our reports dated March 1, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TransAlta Corporation as at December 31, 2011 and 2010 and January 1, 2010 and for the two years ended December 31, 2011, included as an exhibit to TransAlta Corporation’s amended Annual Report on Form 40-F/A for 2011, dated October 30, 2012 and with respect to internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, included as an exhibit to TransAlta Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for 2011, dated March 2, 2012.

 

 
|               |   | signed   “Ernst & Young LLP” |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|               |   |                                            |
| Calgary,   Alberta |   | Chartered   Accountants                         |
| October   30, 2012 |   |                                            |

 

 

----
#### § 353.4 Payment of fees.

Fees for site-specific offsite radiological emergency plans and preparedness services and related site-specific legal services are payable upon notification by FEMA. FEMA services will be billed at 6-month intervals for all accumulated costs on a site-specific basis. Each bill will identify the costs related to services for each nuclear power plant site.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30567

ARTHUR WASHINGTON Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

STATE OF LOUISIANA, on behalf of Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Louisiana

(96-CV-2271)

March 13, 1998

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: *

Louisiana’s argument that Congress did not abrogate Eleventh

Amendment immunity in enacting Title VII is without merit. S ee

Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer

, 427 U.S. 445 (197 5). The judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
#### § 123.511 How will SBA disburse Military Reservist EIDL funds?

Funds will be disbursed only after the essential employee has been called to active service, and you have provided a copy of the essential employee's official call-up orders for active service showing the date of the call-up. SBA will disburse your funds in quarterly installments (unless otherwise specified in your loan authorization agreement) based on a continued need as demonstrated by comparative financial information. On or about 30 days before your scheduled fund disbursement, SBA will request ordinary and usual financial statements (including balance sheets and profit and loss statements). Based on this information, SBA will assess your continued need for disbursements under this program. Upon making such assessment, SBA will notify you of the status of future disbursements.

[73 FR 54675, Sept. 23, 2008, as amended at 88 FR 24110, Apr. 19, 2023]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. No. 97-41492 USDC No. G-97-CV-586

TRAVIS DALE GRAY, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

--------------------- April 13, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT: Texas state prisoner Travis Dale Gray, no. 542293, has requested from this court a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for federal habeas relief. He also requests in forma pauperis (IFP) status on appeal. Gray argues that the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) has erroneously computed the length of his term of imprisonment and that he should be entitled to mandatory supervised release on January 23, 1999. Any potential dispute between Gray and TDCJ "has not ripened into the definite and concrete controversy" necessary for the adjudication of Gray’sO R D E R No. 97-41492 - 2 - claim. Cross v. Lucius , 713 F.2d 153, 159 (5th Cir. 1983). The controversy is more hypothetical than real and, as such, does not present a federal court with the Article III case or controversy requisite to its jurisdiction. Although the district court did not specify whether its dismissal was with or without prejudice, such a dismissal is usually with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Gray’s requests for a COA and IFP are GRANTED and the judgment of the district court is MODIFIED to be WITHOUT PREJUDICE to allow him to bring his claim once the controversy is ripe. The judgment is
AFFIRMED as MODIFIED.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 629 

To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to require Federal 

agencies to submit to the Comptroller General of the United States 

a report on rules that are revoked, suspended, replaced, amended, or 

otherwise made ineffective. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2021 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to require 

Federal agencies to submit to the Comptroller General 

of the United States a report on rules that are revoked, 

suspended, replaced, amended, or otherwise made ineffective. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘GAO Database Mod5 ernization Act of 2021’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 629 IS

1 SEC. 2. RULES NO LONGER IN EFFECT. 

2 Section 801(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is 

3 amended by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(D) For any rule submitted under subparagraph 

5 (A), if the Federal agency promulgating the rule, in whole 

6 or in part, revokes, suspends, replaces, amends, or other7 wise makes the rule ineffective, or the rule is made ineffec8 tive for any other reason, the Federal agency shall submit 

9 to the Comptroller General a report containing— 

10 ‘‘(i) the title of the rule; 

11 ‘‘(ii) the Federal Register citation for the rule, 

12 if any; 

13 ‘‘(iii) the date on which rule was submitted to 

14 the Comptroller General; and 

15 ‘‘(iv) a description of the provisions of the rule 

16 that are being revoked, suspended, replaced, amend17 ed, or otherwise made ineffective.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS