alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.     | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                           |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| 2.     | The                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations                of                China Digital Communication Group. |

| **CHINA DIGITAL COMMUNICATION              GROUP**                  |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                |   |   |   |
| By:                 */s/ Zhongnan Xu*                          |   |   |        |
| ZHONGNAN                XU Chief                  Executive Officer |   |   |        |
|                                                                     |   |   |        |
| Date: March 26, 2008                                           |   |   |   |

----
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00112-CR

Joshua P. RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 262946

Honorable Monica E. Guerrero, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 24, 2009

DISMISSED

Appellant’s attorney has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal by withdrawing appellant’s

notice of appeal. Although the motion is not signed by appellant, see TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a),

appellant stated on the record at a hearing held on May 4, 2009, that he did not want to appeal. The

motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. See id.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We, Richard E. Stoddard, Chief Executive Officer and James F. Verhey, Chief Financial Officer of Kaiser Ventures LLC (the Company),
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                     |  |                                         
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2006 |  | /s/ Richard E. Stoddard                 
|                     |  | Richard E. Stoddard                     
|                     |  | Chairman of the Board, President & CEO  
|                     | 
|                     |  | /s/ James F. Verhey                     
|                     |  | James F. Verhey                         
|                     |  | Executive Vice President - CFO          
|                     |  | Principal Financial & Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No: 23-062 September 29, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

 David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Approves License Transfers for Energy Harbor Nuclear Plants

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved the transfer of the licenses for four 

operating reactors and their associated spent fuel storage facilities from Energy Harbor Nuclear 

Corp. to Vistra Operations Company LLC. The transfer is part of VistraOps’ acquisition of 

Energy Harbor’s nuclear assets. 

The transfer covers the following operating reactors: 

• Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 (Shippingport, Pennsylvania) 

• Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station (Oak Harbor, Ohio) 

• Perry Nuclear Power Plant (Perry, Ohio) 

VistraOps currently operates the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant and its spent fuel 

storage facilities, which are located in Glen Rose, Texas. 

The NRC staff’s review of the license transfer application concluded that VistraOps is 

financially and technically qualified to conduct the activities authorized by the licenses. The 

NRC staff also concluded that VistraOps satisfies the NRC’s decommissioning funding 

assurance requirements, and that the facilities are not owned, controlled, or dominated by a 

foreign entity.
### BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC

Notice of 

### GRANT AVIATION, INC. Docket 

### DOT

**OST~**
Intent to terminate service at Clark's Point, Alaska Pursuant to 49 

### USC 41734


### 9C.Hlay Notice ofTermination of

### Service
Correspondence 

### with regard to

### this document should be addressed to: R Bruce McGlasson 

### CEO GrantAviation, Inc 

### P.O. Box 92200 Anchorage, AK 99509 

### 907 529-6999 bmcg!asson@flygrant.com

March16, 2015Notice of GRANT AVIATION, 

### INC Intentto terminate service at Clark's Pomt, Alaska Pursuant

### to 49 USC 41734 Docket DOT-OST90 Day Notice ofTermination ofService Pursuant to 49 USC 41734, GrantAviation, Inc h r 

### bygives notice ofits intent to terminate scheduled service to Clark's Point, AI ka eff ctiv Jun 14, 2015 in accordance w1th Section 41734, Grant Av ation In upplies e · !o 

### g information: 

### 1 Identification 

### ofCarner Grant Aviation, Inc P.O Box 92200 Anchorage, AK 99509 Communications with re 

### p ct to ttu documentshould be directed to: 

### R Bruce McGlasson 

### CEO Grant Aviation, Inc 

### P.O. Box 92200 Anchorage, AK 

### 99.509 907 529-6999 bmcglasson@flygrant.com 2. At the time 

### ofthis notice GrantAviation provides scheduled service to C!ark's Point, Alaska. 3. Grant Aviation's service to Clark's Point consists of3 flights weekly 4. Grant Aviation, inc provides the only scheduled air service to Clark's Point, Alaska, transporting passengers, cargo, and U.S. Mall

# to and from Dillingham, Alaska, the closest regional hub providing mainline air service. 5. The effective date ofthis notice is March 16, 2015. GrantAviation is hereby providing public notice of its intent to terminate scheduled airservice to Clark's Point, Alaska on June 14, 2015, providing the 90 days notice as required. Any objections to this NoticetoTerminate Service must be filed within 

### 20 days from the date ofthis filing.

R. Bruce McGlasson 

### CEO GrantAviation, Inc P

### .0. Box 92200 Anchorage AK 99509-2200

### I hereby certify that I have caused a copy ofthe foregoing NoticeofTermination to be served on March 15, 2015 to each of the persons named below. Kevin Schlemmer Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis Division 

### U.S. Department 

### ofTransportation kevin.schlemmer@dot.gov 

### Rich 

### Sewell Aviation 

### Policy Planner Division 

### ofStatewide Aviation 

### Alaska DOT/PF Betty Gardiner, 

### City 

### Clerk City ofClark's Point 

### P.O. Sox 110 Clark's 

### Point, AK 99569 

### cityofdark.spoint@gd.net 907.236.1221 Nadine 

### Wassillie Tribal 

### Administrator NativeVillage ofClarks Point 

### 907.236.1427
<page>                                              EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey D. Hahn, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation ("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant,
certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

	  a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

  b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

  c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and


<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:  May 17, 2004         /s/ Jeffrey D. Hahn
                                Jeffrey D. Hahn
                                Chief Financial Officer,
                                Demeter Management Corporation,
                                general partner of the registrant
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1

                       FLAVIN, JACKSON, ZIRILLI & BOUVIER


                                330 FIFTH AVENUE
                           INDIALANTIC, FLORIDA 32903



March 27, 2001

Office of the Chief Accountant
SECPS Letter Files
Securities and Exchange Commission
Mail Stop 9-5
450 Fifth St. NW
Washington, DC  20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We were previously principal accountants for Summit Brokerage Services, Inc.
Under the date of February 17, 1999, we reported on the financial statements of
Summit Brokerage Services, Inc. as of and for the period ended December 31,
1998. On January 13, 2000 our appointment as principal accountants was
terminated. We have read the statements included in the Annual report of Summit
Brokerage Services, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2000, and we agree with such statements.

In addition, we confirm that, during the past two fiscal years and through the
date of this letter, none of our reports on the financial statements of Summit
Brokerage Services, Inc. have contained an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of
opinion, nor were any such reports qualified or modified as to uncertainty,
audit scope, or accounting principles.

Very truly yours,




/S/Flavin, Jackson, Zirilli & Bouvier
-------------------------------------
Flavin, Jackson, Zirilli & Bouvier
## Draft Proposal CB-16

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC). Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/ commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/



## Below-Grade Wall Insulation (CB-16)

Objective: Clarify where and how insulation is to be installed on below

‐ grade walls. The term “installed

in or continuously on" is potentially confusing in that it infers that the insulation could be inside the wall

but not necessarily continuous. Also clarify where the depth of burial measurements are to be made.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section C402.2.4 as follows:

C402.2.4 Thermal resistance of below-grade walls. The minimum thermal resistance (R-value) of the

insulating materials installed in, or continuously within or on the below-grade walls shall be as specified

in Table C402.2 and shall extend to a depth of at least 10 ft below the outside finish ground level, or to

the level of the finished floor associated with the cond itioned space adjacent to the wall , whichever is

less.

Reason: Where insulation is required, the current code requires it to be continuous insulation. The term

“installed in or” is potentially confusing in that it infers that the insulation could be inside the wall but

not necessarily continuous. The proposed change ensures that regardless of the location, the insulation

that is applied must be continuous as provided in Table C402.2. As a minimum code, it is more

appropriate to state measurements such as depth of burial as minimums that can be exceeded rather

than a single “one length only” criterion. The term “floor” can be clarified further to indicate what floor

is being considered. For instance, a wall separating an unconditioned crawl space from a basement or

below

‐ grade room could be a below

‐ grade wall bounded by two floors (conditioned space and crawl

space). The proposed text ensures there is no confusion as to what floor the insulation depth is to be

measured.

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
119 STAT. 20 PUBLIC LAW 109–6—MAR. 31, 2005

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1270:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Mar. 16, considered and passed House.

Mar. 17, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–6

109th Congress

An Act

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the Leaking Underground

Storage Tank Trust Fund financing rate.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK

TRUST FUND FINANCING RATE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 4081(d) of the

Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to Leaking Underground

Storage Tank Trust Fund financing rate) is amended by striking

‘‘April 1, 2005’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2005’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by this section

shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Approved March 31, 2005.

26 USC 4081

note.

26 USC 4081.

Mar. 31, 2005

[H.R. 1270]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-20-2000
<CASH>                                           4,658
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,325
<PP&E>                                          21,811
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 277,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          654,721
<BONDS>                                        325,081
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,942
<OTHER-SE>                                   (711,148)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   277,413
<SALES>                                        238,632
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               238,632
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,809,911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,571,279)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,571,279)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,571,279)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)


</TABLE>
#### Joseph Musial, Appellant, v. County of Nassau et al., Respondents.

Motion for .reargument denied, without costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 779.]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-71 August 24, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PERFORMANCE REVIEW MEETING FOR PILGRIM PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

representatives of the Pilgrim nuclear power plant on Tuesday,

August 31, to discuss the results of the agency’s latest Plant

Performance Review for the facility. Entergy Nuclear, a

subsidiary of New Orleans-based Entergy Corp., operates the

plant, which is located in Plymouth, Mass.

Results of the review are contained in NRC news release I99-38, which was issued on April 13. That press release can be

found on the agency’s web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/gmo/nrarcv/99-38i.htm

The meeting will begin at 2 p.m. in the Winslow Room at

the John Carver Inn, 25 Summer Street, Plymouth. The meeting

will be open to the public for observation. At its conclusion,

NRC staff will be available to answer questions from interested

observers and to meet with state and local officials.

#
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,252,794
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,388,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    433,552
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,509,184
<PP&E>                                       6,302,614
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,678,347
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,548,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,835,729
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,057
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,392,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,548,460
<SALES>                                     11,509,342
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,319,761
<CGS>                                        2,386,563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,982,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,429,550
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,636
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,967,654)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,240
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,995,894)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,995,894)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.34)
        

</TABLE>
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 21

**Question 21:** Is it time to update Regulatory Guide 1.109 and its corresponding codes due to the updated dose conversion factors in the revised Part 20?

**Answer:** Perhaps, but such an update could only be a partial update at this time. The full updating could only occur if and when Appendix I is recast as an effective dose equivalent. The evaluation of whether Appendix I should be changed is currently underway.

(Reference: Regulatory Guides)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 24, 2017
Exhibit 99.2
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Equipment Growth & Income Fund VII (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner and of the Partnership, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 
 
 
 /s/ Richard K Brock
 Richard K Brock
 Chief Financial Officer of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 November 13, 2003