alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Reader’s Guide for Chlorimuron ethyl 

CRM: Wilhelmena Livingston 

EPA/OCSPP/OPP/PRD

Reader’s Guide to Chlorimuron ethyl Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0478 

Publication Date: December 22, 2010 

EPA has created this document to provide an organizational structure to the 

Registration Review Chlorimuron ethyl Docket for Public Comments. The docket index 

groups related documents. The first group contains the Federal Register and Docket 

Organizational Documents, the second group contains the Human Health Assessment, the 

third group contains the Environmental Risk Assessment document, and the fourth group 

contains use/usage information and a review of human incidents. The Agency is 

providing the “Reader’s Guide” to allow the reader to more easily access and navigate the 

various items contained in the chlorimuron ethyl docket. 

Federal Register and Docket Organizational Documents: 

Docket Item 1. Federal Register Notice: Chlorimuron ethyl Registration Review 

Docket Item 2. Reader’s Guide to the Chlorimuron ethyl Docket # EPA- 

 HQ-OPP-2010-0478 

Docket Item 3. Chlorimuron ethyl Summary Document 

Human Health Documents for Registration Review 

Docket Item 4. Chlorimuron ethyl. Human Health Assessment Scoping Document 

 in Support of Registration Review 

(September 27, 2010)

This document evaluates the status of the human health assessments to determine the 

scope of work necessary to support the registration review of the sulfonylurea class 

herbicide chlorimuron ethyl. 

Environmental Fate and Effects Documents for Registration Review 

Docket Item 5. Registration Review: Preliminary Problem Formulation for the 

 Ecological Risk Assessment of Chlorimuron-ethyl 

 (November 19, 2010) 

This document defines the problem for the assessment, and develops a plan for analyzing 

and characterizing the ecological risks. 
Use and Usage Information for Registration Review 

Docket Item 6. PRD Appendix A Food/Feed & Non-Food/Non Feed Uses 

 Considered in Registration Review Work Planning. 

 Chlorimuron ethyl (128901). 

(January 19, 2010) 

 

This table lists the food/feed and non-food/non- feed uses for chlorimuron ethyl. 

Docket Item 7. Chlorimuron ethyl (128901) Screening Level Usage Analysis 

 (SLUA) 

 (January 25, 2010)

This document provides the available estimates of pesticide usage data for chlorimuron 

ethyl that is used on agricultural crops in the United States. 

Docket Item 8. BEAD Chemical Profile for Registration Review: Chlorimuron- 

 ethyl (128901) 

 (December 2, 2010) 

The purpose of this document is to convey usage information and a broad overview of the 

pest management roles of pesticides that are beginning to undergo registration review. 

Incident Report for Chlorimuron ethyl 

Docket Item 9. Chlorimuron ethyl Review of Human Incidents 

(August 19, 2010) 

This report represents poisoning incidents occurring in the United States from 2000 to 

the present for chlorimuron ethyl.
Traits, Characteristics, 

Principles, Components o

Attributes of Safety Culture

Theory and Research
Safety Culture is Multi-dimensi

• According to Schein’s theory • Supported by questionnaire researc• Practical 
Relationship of Traits to Safety Cul
Christian, et al (2009)

• Reviewed 500 studies• Analyzed 90 (excluded driver behav• Wide range of industries• International
Defined climate as perceptions 

• Management commitment to safety• Human resources practices• Quality of safety systems• Supervisor support for safety• Internal group processes• Group boundary management• Risk associated with activities/environ• Work pressure• Leadership
Proposed Model
Final Model
Other Findings

• Group-level , shared perceptions we

more strongly related to safety outcthan individual-level perceptions

• Individual-level perceptions were ab

equally related to safety behavior as group-level perceptions
Implications

• INPO, NRC and INSAG lists of traits 

fairly complete

• Appears to be support for developin

common terminology to describe saculture traits

• Appears common terminology may 

be applicable to individual contributo
#### Samuel Salsky, Respondent, v. Rugby Casuals, Inc., Appellant. Samuel Salsky, Respondent, v. Theodore Birke et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-81076-CIV-SMITH

KENNETH JOHANSEN,

Plaintiff,

v. 

BLUEGREEN VACATIONS 

UNLIMITED, INC.,

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR 

A LIMITED STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF RULE 23(f) PETITION

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for a Limited Stay Pending 

Resolution of Rule 23(f) Petition [DE 98]. Upon consideration, it is 

ORDERED that: 

1. The Joint Motion for a Limited Stay Pending Resolution of Rule 23(f) Petition [DE 98] is 

GRANTED. 

2. The case is STAYED pending the resolution of Plaintiff’s Rule 23(f) Petition. 

3. The parties shall file a joint status report within fourteen (14) days of any order issued by 

the Eleventh Circuit resolving Plaintiff’s Rule 23(f) Petition. 

4. All pending motions not otherwise ruled upon are DENIED as moot. 

5. This case is administratively CLOSED. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida on this 16th day of November, 2021. 

cc: Counsel of record 

Case 9:20-cv-81076-RS Document 99 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2021 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 2:20-cv-14233-KMM

CHARLTON EDWARD LACHASE,

Plaintiff,

v.

ST. LUCIE COUNTY JAIL,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff Charlton Edward LaChase’s pro se

Complaint bringing claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (“Compl.”) (ECF No. 1). The matter

was referred to the Honorable Lisette M. Reid, United States Magistrate Judge, who issued a 

Report and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s Complaint be DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (“R&R”) (ECF No. 17). Plaintiff did not file objections and the time 

to do so has passed. The matter is now ripe for review. As set forth below, the Court ADOPTS 

the R&R. 

The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). 

As set forth in the R&R, Magistrate Judge Reid finds that the Complaint should be 

dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the Court’s Order. R&R at 3. 

Specifically, Magistrate Judge Reid explains that (1) Plaintiff’s Complaint is a deficient shotgun 

pleading and (2) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint by August 31, 2020 as ordered by 

the Court. See id. at 2; see also Order to Amend Compl. (ECF No. 13). Additionally, Plaintiff 

was cautioned that failure to timely amend his complaint would result in dismissal. Id. 

Case 2:20-cv-14233-KMM Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/16/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Reid recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint 

pursuant to its “inherent authority to manage its own docket.” See id. at 2, 4; see also Equity 

Lifestyle Props., Inc. v. Fla. Mowing & Landscape Serv., Inc., 556 F.3d 1232, 1240 (11th Cir. 

2009). This Court agrees.

Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Complaint, the R&R, the pertinent 

portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED 

AND ADJUDGED that the R&R (ECF No. 17) is ADOPTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff Charlton Edward LaChase’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the 

Court’s Order to Amend Complaint (ECF No. 13);

2. The Court’s order granting petitioner in forma pauperis status and establishing a 

debt (ECF No. 11) is VACATED;

3. The Clerk of Court is instructed to CLOSE this case; and

4. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this ___ day of February, 2021. 

K. MICHAEL MOORE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Charlton Edward LaChase

 17080104

 Miami Federal Detention Center

 Inmate Mail/Parcels

 Post Office Box 019120

 Miami, FL 33101

 PRO SE

15th

Case 2:20-cv-14233-KMM Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/16/2021 Page 2 of 2
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionRelated InformationProposed Security Rulemaking for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations

# Future Actions Regarding the Proposed Security Rulemaking for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will take the following future actions with regard to the Proposed Security Rulemaking for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSIs).

On September 11, 2015 the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff submitted to the Commission COMSECY-15-0024 (ML15229A231) recommending postponing the start of the proposed security rulemaking for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSIs) and Monitored Retrievable Storage Installations (MRS), allowing staff to complete its MELCOR analysis of release scenarios, re-focus energies on a related rulemaking on power reactor decommissioning and take into account the potential construction of one or more consolidated interim storage facilities. The staff stated this rulemaking could safely be postponed because existing security orders and inspections already provide adequate protection of ISFSIs.

NRC commissioners voted October 6 (ML15280A105) to approve staff's recommendation to delay for five years the start of a proposed rulemaking on security for spent fuel and waste storage facilities.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Background
          - Future Actions
          - Public Involvement
          - Rulemaking Objectives

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020
#### § 146.410 Enforcement.

The head of each agency shall take such actions as are necessary to ensure that the provisions herein are vigorously implemented and enforced in that agency.
#### Stephen Callaghan et al. v. Frank Bailey et al., Impleaded with Raymond E. Jones et al.

Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
#### § 4.339 Exceptions or comments regarding recommended decision by administrative law judge.

Within 30 days after receipt of the recommended decision of the administrative law judge, any party may file exceptions to or other comments on the decision with the Board.
§ 6305.20 How will BLM allow access to valid mining claims or other valid occupancies within wilderness areas? If you hold a valid mining claim or other valid occupancy wholly within a wilderness area, BLM will allow you access by means that are consistent with the preservation of the area as wilderness and that have been or are being customarily enjoyed with respect to other mining claims or similar occupancies surrounded by wilderness. ( a ) BLM approves plans of operation under subpart 3809 of this chapter. The plan of operation will prescribe the routes of travel that you may use for access to claims or sites surrounded by wilderness. These plans will also identify the mode of travel, and other conditions reasonably necessary to preserve the wilderness area.
( b ) BLM issues written authorizations under part 2920 of this chapter. Your authorization will prescribe the routes of travel that you may use for access to occupancies surrounded by wilderness. The authorizations will also identify the mode of travel and other conditions reasonably necessary to minimize adverse impacts on the natural resource values of the wilderness area.
1 

### Palma, Elizabeth

From: Palma, Elizabeth

Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 12:13 PM

To: Aaron Szabo (aaron_l_szabo@omb.eop.gov)

Cc: Melinda Beaver (Beaver.Melinda@epa.gov); G abrilovich, Lev; Long, Pam; Wood, Anna;

Lorang, Phil; Jones, Rhea; Smith, Kris ti; Paula VanLare (VanLare.Paula@epa.gov)

Subject: Responses to interagency comments on the draft supplemental exceptional events

implementation guidance for wildfire/ozone events

Attachments: O3_Wildfire_Guidance_compare 10-28-15_to 10-13-15.docx; O3_Wildfire_Guidance_

10-28-15_OMBcommentsaddressed.docx; Summa ry of Interagency Comments Under

EO12866_13563 EPA Supplemental EE_EPAresponse_final_20151028.docx

Aaron

‐

Attached please find a clean version of the draft supplemental exceptional events implementation guidance (i.e., the

wildfire/ozone guidance) that incorporates changes resulting from OMB/interagency review as well as a few other

clarifications. I have also attached a "compare" document, which compares today's 10/28/15 clean version of the

guidance to the version that was accepted by OMB on 10/15/15. Also attached is the comment response document that

responds to the OMB/interagency comments that we received on Monday 10/26/15.

Please let me know whether you have any additional comments or questions.

Regards,

Beth

Beth W. Palma

USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

109 TW Alexander Drive (C539

‐ 04)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

palma.elizabeth@epa.gov

919.541.5432
#### Arvilla V. Russell, Respondent-Appellant, v. Samuel A. Williams, Appellant-Respondent.

Memorandum: On the argument plaintiff withdrew her appeal, consequently only defendant’s appeal is to be determined. Defendant contends *747that the verdict is against the weight of credible evidence and could only have been based on the testimony of the witness, Hamelinck, which defendant says is improbable and incredible. With that contention we do not agree. The credibility of the witness was for the jury to determine. The verdict is also supported by the position of the trucks immediately after the accident. The question of the negligence and freedom from negligence of the drivers of the two trucks was for the jury to determine. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
----

----

I Informacije

Svet

----

Informacije o začetku veljavnosti Sklepa Pridružitvenega sveta EU-Tunizija št. 1/2005 o odstopanju od določb o opredelitvi pojma „izdelki s poreklom“ in načinih upravnega sodelovanja, določenih v Evro-mediteranskem sporazumu o pridružitvi med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami ter Republiko Tunizijo (1)

(2005/C 236/01)

Sporazum o prosti trgovini med Republiko Tunizijo in Turčijo je začel veljati 1. julija 2005.

Pogoji iz člena 2 Sklepa Pridružitvenega sveta EU-Tunizija št. 1/2005 so bili izpolnjeni, zato se Sklep uporablja od 14. julija 2005.

----

(1)UL L 190, 22.7.2005, str. 3.

----

Komisija

----

Menjalni tečaji eura (1)

23. septembra 2005

(2005/C 236/02)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Vir: referenčni menjalni tečaj, ki ga objavlja ECB.

----

----

Sporočilo Komisije v okviru izvajanja Direktive Sveta 96/48/ES z dne 23. julija 1996 o interoperabilnosti vseevropskega železniškega sistema za visoke hitrosti

(2005/C 236/03)

(Besedilo velja za EGP)

(Objava naslovov in sklicev harmoniziranih standardov po direktivi)

OPOMBA:

Več informacij o harmoniziranih standardih najdete na internetu na :

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/standardization/harmstds/

----

(1)  ESO: Evropske organizacije za standarde:

(2)UL L 204, 21.7.1998, str. 37.

(3)UL L 217, 5.8.1998, str. 18.

----

----

Predhodna priglasitev koncentracije

(Št. primera COMP/M.3920 – France Télécom/Amena)

(2005/C 236/04)

(Besedilo velja za EGP)

----

(1)UL L 24, 29.1.2004, str. 1.

----

----

Nenasprotovanje priglašeni koncentraciji

(Št. primera COMP/M.3914 – Tele2/Versatel)

(2005/C 236/05)

(Besedilo velja za EGP)

Dne 7. septembra 2005 je Komisija odločila, da ne bo nasprotovala navedeni priglašeni koncentraciji, in jo razglaša za združljivo s skupnim trgom. Ta odločba je sprejeta v skladu s členom 6(1)(b) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004. Celotno besedilo te odločbe je na razpolago le v angleščini in bo objavljeno potem, ko bo očiščeno morebitnih poslovnih skrivnosti. Dostopno bo:

----

----

Nenasprotovanje priglašeni koncentraciji

(Št. primera COMP/M.3856 – Boeing/Lockheed Martin/United Launch Alliance JV)

(2005/C 236/06)

(Besedilo velja za EGP)

Dne 9. avgusta 2005 je Komisija odločila, da ne bo nasprotovala navedeni priglašeni koncentraciji, in jo razglaša za združljivo s skupnim trgom. Ta odločba je sprejeta v skladu s členom 6(1)(b) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004. Celotno besedilo te odločbe je na razpolago le v angleščini in bo objavljeno potem, ko bo očiščeno morebitnih poslovnih skrivnosti. Dostopno bo:

----

----

Dokumenti KOM, razen zakonodajnih predlogov, ki jih je sprejela Komisija

(2005/C 236/07)

Ti dokumenti so dosegljivi na EUR-Lex: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

----

II Pripravljalni akti

Komisija

----

Zakonodajni predlogi, ki jih je sprejela Komisija

(2005/C 236/08)

Ti dokumenti so dosegljivi na EUR-Lex: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

----
#### Blatchford F. Wager v. Maurice Cohen.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §2043. Deposit of other moneys

Except for public moneys deposited under section 2041 of this title, each clerk of the United States courts shall deposit public moneys that the clerk collects into a checking account in the Treasury, subject to disbursement by the clerk. At the end of each accounting period, the earned part of public moneys accruing to the United States shall be deposited in the Treasury to the credit of the appropriate receipt accounts.

(Added Pub. L. 97–258, §2(g)(4)(E), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1061.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 28:2043 | 31:725v(b)(related to clerks). | June 26, 1934, ch. 756, §23(b)(related to clerks), 48 Stat. 1236; restated Dec. 21, 1944, ch. 631, §1, 58 Stat. 845. |

The words "Except for public moneys deposited under section 2041 of this title . . . public moneys" are substituted for "All fees and other collections other than moneys referred to in subsection (a) of this section" for consistency and because 31:725v(a) is superseded by 28:2041 and is not part of the revised title contained in section 1 of the bill. The word "Treasury" is substituted for "Treasurer of the United States" because of section 1 of Reorganization Plan No. 26 of 1950 (eff. July 31, 1950, 64 Stat. 1280), restated as section 321 of the revised title contained in section 1 of the bill. The text of 31:725v(b)(last sentence) is omitted as obsolete.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.176 Compliance with other laws.

All SBA loans are subject to all applicable laws, including (without limitation) the civil rights laws (*see* parts 112, 113, 117 and 136 of this chapter), prohibiting discrimination on the grounds of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, marital status, disability or age. SBA requests agreements or evidence to support or document compliance with these laws, including reports required by applicable statutes or the regulations in this chapter.
U.S. Deportment 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

APR 2 4 2015 

Hunter Carpenter 

Director of Public Policy, Agricultural Retailers Association 

1156 151

h Street, NW, Suite 500 

Washington, DC 20005 

Dear Mr. Carpenter, 

This is in response to your April 20, 2015, request for an extension of the comment period 

for the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) entitled "Operation and Certification of 

Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems" (Docket F AA-20 15-0 150-2715). You requested that the 

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) extend the comment period an additional30 days in 

order for you to compile comments from the Agricultural Retailers Association's members. 

The NPRM comment period closes April 24, 2015. The FAA believes that it is important to 

move quickly to address the operation and certification of small unmanned aircraft systems. 

The FAA, also, believes that the 60-day comment period provided for in the NPRM is a 

sufficient period of time for interested parties to file comments on the proposed rules. 

Therefore, the FAA does not believe it is necessary to extend the comment period per your 

request, and your request for an extension of the comment period is denied. However, as 

stated in 14 Code of Federal Regulations § 11.45, we will consider comments filed late if it 

is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. 

We have placed this response in the rulemaking docket. 

Sincerely, 

Director, Office of Rulemaking 

1 Additionally, 14 Code of Federal Regulations § 11.47 requires that a request for extension of the comment 

period be filed at least I 0 days before the end of the comment period.
#### § 131.450 Budget justification.

*General.* The WBC Program Director or finance person of the non-Federal entity will prepare and submit the budget justification for the upcoming program/budget period for review by the SBA as part of the WBC's application package pursuant to the applicable program announcement. Worksheets are provided by OWBO for this purpose.