alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1



RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)
CERTIFICATION

BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Richard E. Stoddard, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Kaiser Ventures LLC;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably like to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                     |  |  |  |                                            
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 23, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    RICHARD E. STODDARD                 
|                     |  |  |  |                                            
|                     |  |  |  | Richard E. Stoddard Chief Executive Officer
#### § 9265.0-3 Authority.

The provisions of § 9265.5 of this title are issued under sections 1852 and 1853 of title 18 U.S.C., and section 1733 of title 43 U.S.C., unless otherwise specified.

[45 FR 31276, May 12, 1980, as amended at 60 FR 50451, Sept. 29, 1995]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-22438-CIV-WILLIAMS

JOSE ANTONIO RUIZ BURGOS,

Plaintiff/Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant/Appellee.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’ 

Report and Recommendation (DE 24) on the cross motions for summary judgment (DE 

21; DE 22). In the Report, Magistrate Judge Torres Recommended Defendant’s Motion 

be GRANTED, Plaintiff’s motion be DENIED, and the judgment AFFIRMED. Plaintiff filed

objections to the Report. (DE 25.) The Court has conducted a de novo review.

Having carefully reviewed the Report, the objections, the record, and the 

applicable law, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report (DE 24) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 22) is GRANTED. 

3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 21) is DENIED.

4. The Judgment is AFFIRMED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 31st day of March, 2022.

Case 1:20-cv-22438-KMW Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/31/2022 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.1: CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
1350

            In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of Magna-Lab, Inc. for the quarter ended May 31, 2003, the undersigned hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

            (1)   such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May
                  31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
                  10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2003 fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of Magna-Lab, Inc.


      July 11, 2003                               /s/ John R. Geisel
                                                  ------------------
                                                  Name: John Geisel
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### Anthony Sammartano, Respondent, v. Grossman Steel Stair Corporation, Appellant, and Margate Estates, Inc., Defendant-Respondent.

Present •—• Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
§ 113.530 Marital or parental status. ( a ) *General.* A recipient shall not apply any policy or take any employment action: ( 1 ) Concerning the potential marital, parental, or family status of an employee or applicant for employment that treats persons differently on the basis of sex; or
( 2 ) Which is based upon whether an employee or applicant for employment is the head of household or principal wage earner in such employee's or applicant's family unit.
( b ) *Pregnancy.* A recipient shall not discriminate against or exclude from employment any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom.
( c ) *Pregnancy as a temporary disability.* Subject to § 113.235(d), a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, recovery therefrom, and any temporary disability resulting therefrom as any other temporary disability for all job-related purposes, including commencement, duration, and extensions of leave, payment of disability income, accrual of seniority and any other benefit or service, and reinstatement, and under any fringe benefit offered to employees by virtue of employment.
( d ) *Pregnancy leave.* In the case of a recipient that does not maintain a leave policy for its employees, or in the case of an employee with insufficient leave or accrued employment time to qualify for leave under such a policy, a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, and recovery therefrom as a justification for a leave of absence without pay for a reasonable period of time, at the conclusion of which the employee shall be reinstated to the status that she held when the leave began or to a comparable position, without decrease in rate of compensation or loss of promotional opportunities, or any other right or privilege of employment.
The Mariposa Grove 

of Giant Sequoias 

In 1864, for the first time 

in history, the United States 

Congress passed an act 

protecting two pieces of land 

for preservation and public 

use, forever. This act laid the 

foundation for the national 

parks and protected areas in

our country today. Those two

pieces of land were Yosemite 

Valley and the Mariposa 

Grove of Giant Sequoias.

The ecology of giant sequoia 

groves is complex and 

remarkable. We often think of 

fire as a bad thing, but 

sequoia ecosystems depend 

on it. Frequent fires clear the 

immense amount of branches, 

needles, and cones on the 

forest floor, enriching the soil 

so sequoia seedlings can 

thrive. When there is no fire, 

there is not enough open 

space or nutrients for new 

sequoias to grow. 

The cones of the giant sequoia 

are small and secure; tightly 

retaining over 200 seeds 

inside. Another reason 

sequoias need fire is to open 

up those tightly sealed 

cones and release the tiny 

seeds inside to float down to 

the forest floor, where they 

can germinate and grow. 

Perhaps the most famous tree 

in the grove, the Grizzly 

Giant, is about 1,800 years 

old. Can you imagine the 

millions of people and animals 

who have come and gone and 

been thankful for 

that one tree?
#### § 127.302 Where can a concern apply for certification?

A concern seeking certification as a WOSB or EDWOSB may apply to SBA for certification via *https://certify.sba.gov* or any successor system. Certification pages must be validated electronically or signed by a person authorized to represent the concern.

[85 FR 27661, May 11, 2020]
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION  I, Keith Berman, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of instaCare Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: May 15, 2009  /s/ Keith Berman Keith Berman Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 121
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 121 appear at 72 FR 50039 and 50040, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 121.302 When does SBA determine the size status of an applicant? ( a ) The size status of an applicant for SBA financial assistance is determined as of the date the application for financial assistance is accepted for processing by SBA, except for applications under the Preferred Lenders Program (PLP), the Disaster Loan program, the SBIC program, and the New Markets Venture Capital (NMCV) program.
( b ) For the Preferred Lenders Program, size is determined as of the date of approval of the loan by the Preferred Lender.
( c ) For disaster loan assistance (other than physical disaster loans), size status is determined as of the date the disaster commenced, as set forth in the Disaster Declaration. For pre-disaster mitigation loans, size status is determined as of the date SBA accepts a complete Pre-Disaster Mitigation Small Business Loan Application for processing. Refer to § 123.408 of this chapter to find out what SBA considers to be a complete Pre-Disaster Mitigation Small Business Loan Application.
( d ) For financial assistance from an SBIC licensee or an NMVC company, size is determined as of the date a concern's application is accepted for processing by the SBIC or the NMVC company.
( e ) Changes in size after the applicable date when size is determined will not disqualify an applicant for assistance.
[61 FR 3286, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 48276, Sept. 3, 1999; 67 FR 11880, Mar. 15, 2002; 67 FR 62337, Oct. 7, 2002; 69 FR 29204, May 21, 2004; 70 FR 72594, Dec. 6, 2005; 73 FR 41254, July 18, 2008; 75 FR 48550, Aug. 11, 2010; 79 FR 33669, June 12, 2014; 85 FR 7652, Feb. 10, 2020; 85 FR 80589, Dec. 14, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          26,487
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,647
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,490
<PP&E>                                          71,770
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,050
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,613,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,032
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,696
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,423,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,613,270
<SALES>                                        175,880
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               305,887
<CGS>                                          202,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  202,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                102,647
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             72,047
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 91,208
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   163,255
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .165
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .165
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.937 Assumption.

A 504 loan may be assumed with SBA's prior written approval.
HomeAbout NRCNRC COVID-19 UpdateCOVID-19 Regulatory Activities for Nuclear Reactors

Nuclear Reactors COVID-19 Activities:**10 CFR Part 20** | **10 CFR Part 26** | **10 CFR 50.48** | **10 CFR 50.55a Codes & Standards | Owner's Activity Reports** | **10 CFR Part 55** | **10 CFR Part 73** | **Research & Test Reactors** | **Resident Inspectors** | **Approved Licensing Requests**

### Approved COVID-19 Licensing Requests

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

This page lists COVID-19 licensing requests that have been approved by the NRC for Power Reactors and Non-Power Reactors.

**Power Reactors:**
        - Exemption Requests
        - License Amendment Requests
        - Relief Requests

**Non-Power Reactors:**
        - Exemption Requests
        - License Amendment Requests

**Other COVID-19 Approved Licensing Requests**

## Highlights

        -  The NRC staff receives exemption requests, license amendment requests, and relief requests from licensees related to COVID-19 regulatory impacts. 
        -  The NRC reviews exemption requests to determine if exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common defense and security, and there are special circumstances present. 
        -  The NRC reviews license amendment requests to determine if there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered and that implementation of the license amendment will be conducted in compliance with the NRC's regulations, and the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public. 
        -  The NRC reviews relief requests to determine if the proposed alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety, complying with the specified requirement would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety, use of later ASME Code editions and addenda addresses all related ASME Code requirements, or granting relief is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest giving due consideration to the burden upon the licensee that could result if the requirements were imposed on the facility. 

## COVID-19 Power Reactor Approved Licensing Requests

        - Power Reactor Approved Requests Raw Data  |  Data Dictionary

## Exemption Requests

## License Amendment Requests

## Relief Requests

(S) – Indicates supplement to initial licensee submission

## COVID-19 Non-Power Reactor Approved Licensing Requests

        - Non-Power Reactor Approved Requests Raw Data  |  Data Dictionary

## Exemptions Requests

## License Amendment Requests

(S) – Indicates supplement to initial licensee submission

## Other COVID-19 Approved Licensing Requests

(S) – Indicates supplement to initial licensee submission

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 26, 2022
#### § 305.14 Occupancy prior to completion.

Occupancy of any part of the Project prior to final acceptance is entirely at the Recipient's risk and must follow the requirements of local and State law.
No: 23-074 November 13, 2023 

CONTACT: Ivonne Couret, 301-415-8200 

NRC to Hold Two Workshops; Registration Available Online

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research will host 

two workshops on reactor topics in November and December. 

On November 28-29, the NRC, the Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy, 

and the Idaho National Laboratory will host a hybrid workshop on structural health management 

for nuclear power plants. The workshop will be held at NRC headquarters in the Two White 

Flint North Auditorium, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, and online via Teams. 

Registration is free, but attendees must register online. 

On December 5-6, the NRC will host a virtual workshop on the integration and 

implementation of security, safety, and safeguards in advanced reactors, microreactors, and 

advanced fuel fabrication facilities in both design and operations. Attendees must register by 

November 17.
Appendix E: Whiskeytown Reservoir Wakeless Areas

299

Legend

Wakeless Areas

±
Exhibit 10.1

Exhibit 1
Board Compensation for Directors*
​
	​
​


	


	Type of Compensation
	Amount

	Board Cash Retainer+
	Fiscal 2021: $12,500 payable monthly on the last day of each fiscal month, commencing April 1, 2021+



​
	*
	Includes only persons serving as Independent Directors.


	+
	For any person who ceases to serve during the fiscal month prior to such payment date, such person shall receive a pro rata amount for the portion of the fiscal month so served.
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.227 Finality of decisions. ( a ) *Initial decisions.* Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a decision by the Judge on the merits is an initial decision. However, unless a request for review is filed pursuant to § 134.228(a), or a request for reconsideration is filed pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, an initial decision shall become the final decision of the SBA 30 days after its service.
( b ) *Final decisions.* A decision by the Judge on the merits shall be a final decision in the following proceedings: ( 1 ) Collection of debts owed to SBA and the United States under the Debt Collection Act of 1982, Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, and part 140 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Appeals from SBA 8(a) program determinations under the Act and part 124 of this chapter;
( 3 ) Appeals from size determinations and NAICS code designations under part 121 of this chapter;
( 4 ) Size Standard Petitions; and
( 5 ) In other proceedings as provided either in the applicable program regulations or in other subparts of this part 134.
( c ) *Reconsideration.* Except as otherwise provided by statute, the applicable program regulations in this chapter, or this part 134, an initial or final decision of the Judge may be reconsidered. Any party in interest, including SBA where SBA did not appear as a party during the proceeding that led to the issuance of the Judge's decision, may request reconsideration by filing with the Judge and serving a petition for reconsideration within 20 days after service of the written decision, upon a clear showing of an error of fact or law material to the decision. The Judge also may reconsider a decision on his or her own initiative.
[67 FR 47249, July 18, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 17587, Apr. 7, 2005; 81 FR 48595, July 25, 2016; 82 FR 25507, June 2, 2017]