alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                  UNITED TEXTILES & TOYS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                   EXHIBIT 27
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X


     The schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from the
financial  statements  for the three months ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such statements.

</LEGEND> 
       
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                  <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                                   152,725
<SECURITIES>                                                   0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                            200,674
<ALLOWANCES>                                              32,013
<INVENTORY>                                            7,397,533
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       7,985,273
<PP&E>                                                 5,407,233
<DEPRECIATION>                                         3,003,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        10,656,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  9,731,920
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                  97,881
<OTHER-SE>                                           (1,887,095)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          10,656,938
<SALES>                                                3,369,479
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       3,369,482
<CGS>                                                  2,344,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          2,344,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       2,286,833
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       139,345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (978,996)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (978,996)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0     
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (978,996)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (.10)

        



</TABLE>
Presidential Documents

60275

Federal Register 

Vol. 69, No. 194

Thursday, October 7, 2004

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 7824 of October 4, 2004

Fire Prevention Week, 2004

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation

Fire Prevention Week is an opportunity for all Americans to learn more 

about how to avoid fires, as well as how to best respond in case of such 

an emergency. By making fire safety a priority, we can help limit the 

devastating effects of fires and enhance the safety of our citizens. 

A large majority of fire deaths in the United States occur in the home. 

This year’s theme, ‘‘It’s Fire Prevention Week: Test Your Smoke Alarms,’’ 

reflects the importance of installing and maintaining working smoke alarms 

on every floor of the home. As vital early warning systems, smoke alarms 

reduce the chances of a fire becoming fatal by approximately 50 percent. 

Americans can also take steps to reduce the chance of a fire ever starting. 

These include using electrical devices safely, avoiding overloading circuits, 

and carefully operating stoves, fireplaces, and space heaters. We should 

also supervise our children and educate them about the dangers of lighters 

and matches, exercise care in the storing of firewood and other flammable 

materials, and obey local burning laws. More information about these and 

other measures is available from the National Fire Protection Association 

and the Department of Homeland Security’s United States Fire Administration. 

Firefighters are among our greatest heroes, and they risk their lives each 

day to protect our citizens and our homeland. All Americans owe them 

a debt of gratitude for their courage and dedication. By working to prevent 

disasters and by being prepared, we support firefighters as they serve communities across our Nation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 3 through October 

9, 2004, as Fire Prevention Week. I call upon the people of the United 

States to observe this week with appropriate activities and to undertake 

efforts to prevent fires and their tragic consequences. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand four, and of the IndependVerDate jul<14>2003 16:19 Oct 06, 2004 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4705 Sfmt 4790 E:\FR\FM\07OCD0.SGM 07OCD0

[FR Doc. 04–22757

Filed 10–6–04; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 

ence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-ninth.

W
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTwo papers on feed-forward networksConnectionist feed-forward networks, trained with back-propagation, can be used both for nonlinear regression and for (discrete one-of-C) classification, depending on the form of training. This report contains two papers on feed-forward networks. The papers can be read independently. They are intended for the theoretically-aware practitioner or algorithm-designer; however, they also contain a review and comparison of several learning theories so they provide a perspective for the theoretician. The first paper works through Bayesian methods to complement back-propagation in the training of feed-forward networks. The second paper addresses a problem raised by the first: how to efficiently calculate second derivatives on feed-forward networks.Document ID19920017388Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBuntine, Wray L.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Weigend, Andreas S.*(Stanford Univ. CA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 5, 1991Subject CategoryCyberneticsReport/Patent NumberFIA-91-22NAS 1.15:107840NASA-TM-107840Accession Number92N26631Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920017388.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 130.340 Specific program responsibilities. ( a ) *Policy development.* The AA/SBDC will establish program policies and procedures to improve the delivery of services by SBDCs to the small business community, and to enhance compliance with applicable laws, regulations, OMB guidelines, and Executive orders. The AA/SBDC will, to the extent practicable, consult with the recognized association.
( b ) *Program administration.* The AA/SBDC or designee will recommend the annual program budget, establish appropriate funding levels in compliance with the statute, and review the annual budgets submitted by each applicant. The AA/SBDC will also select applicants to participate in the Program, to maintain a clearinghouse to provide for the dissemination and exchange of information between SBDCs, and to conduct audits of recipients of SBDC grants.
( c ) *Responsibilities of SBDC Lead Center Directors.* ( 1 ) The SBDC Lead Center Director must be an individual dedicating not less than 75 percent of their time to the supervision and control of the SBDC on behalf of the recipient organization. The position may not be held by a company or contractor.
( 2 ) The SBDC Lead Center Director position must have direct reporting authority, at a minimum, equivalent to that of a college dean in a university setting or the third level of management or administration within a state agency.
( 3 ) The Lead Center Director will direct and monitor program activities and financial affairs of the SBDC network to ensure effective delivery of services to the small business community, and compliance with applicable laws, regulations, 2 CFR part 200, and the terms and conditions of the cooperative agreement.
( 4 ) The SBDC Lead Center Director must have the authority necessary to control all personnel, budgets, and expenditures under the cooperative agreement.
( 5 ) The SBDC Lead Center Director will serve as the SBA's principal contact for all matters involving the SBDC network including, but not limited to, ensuring that state and local needs are addressed; financial and programmatic reporting are submitted; service centers are providing access to training; employees have experience necessary to conduct meaningful counseling; etc.
[88 FR 76643, Nov. 7, 2023]
BEALE TRAVEL SERVICE, INC 

20 North Michigan Avenue Phone: 312-3464141 

Suite210 Fax: 312-3464213 

Chicago, IL 60602 www.bealetravel.com 

February 24, 2010 ^ 

The Honorable Ray LaHood ;";..j 

Secretary — Vj^f: 

United States Department of Transportation tyiM 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE . ^ 

Washington, D.C. , j o 

20590 -^ ~ 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's 

application to provide new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International 

Airport and Los Angeles International Airport to Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last 

December in reaching a landmark Open Skies agreementv.ith Japan, which opens up 

Haneda to service by U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New 

York and Los Angeles to Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between 

three of the world's largest financial and commerce centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance 

membership, have underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific 

market. American is likewise committed to New York and Los Angeles - both vital focal 

points of business, trade, entertainment, technology and education - providing 

unsurpassed air service since the mid-1900s 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits 

from these proposed new flights, as will American's customers and employees, 

wever, we need your help to make the JFK & LAX/Haneda connection a realt 

VIRTUOSO MEMBER ^^ ^ WIHWATONAL 

SPECIAUSTS IN THE ART OF TRAVEL 

reality 

CRUISE UVES 

NTERNATIONA 

ASSOCIATION, INC. 
Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to 

fly from Kennedy and Los Angeles to Haneda! 

Sincer 

Heinz 0-/1^ufer 

President 

Beale Travel Service, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-10075-JLK

CHELSEE RAYNSFORD,

Plaintiff,

v.

BREEZY BUDDHA CAFÉ, LLC, et al.,

Defendants. 

 / 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER APPROVING

SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Approve FLSA

Settlement Agreement and Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (D.E. #11) filed

August 26, 2020, in the above-styled case. Accordingly, after a careful review of the

record and pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED as follows:

1. That the parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Parties’ Settlement and

Dismissing Case with Prejudice (D.E. #11) be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED.

2. The above-styled case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court

retains jurisdiction of this matter for the enforcement of the terms and conditions of

settlement.

3. All unresolved pending motions in this case are hereby DENIED as moot.

4. The Pretrial Conference previously set for November 5, 2021 and the

Case 4:20-cv-10075-JLK Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Trial previously set for January 31, 2022 are hereby CANCELED.

5. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case. 

DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at the James Lawrence King Federal Justice 

Building and United States Courthouse, Miami, Florida, this 27 day of August, 2020. th

 

JAMES LAWRENCE KING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: All Counsel of Record

Case 4:20-cv-10075-JLK Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2020 Page 2 of 2
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 31

**Question 31:** Are students and volunteers subject to the occupational dose limits? For example, nuclear medicine students, or "candy stripers" that transport nuclear medicine patients or perform volunteer work in a nuclear medicine department.

**Answer:** Occupational dose is defined in revised Part 20 as "the dose received by an individual in a restricted area or in the course of employment in which the individual's assigned duties involve exposure to radiation . . ." In the question above, the individual's assigned duties do involve exposure to radiation as a necessary feature of those duties; therefore, the students and volunteer are subject to the occupational dose limits.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1003, 10 CFR 20.1201)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 24, 2017
### §355. Action by Judicial Conference

(a) In General.—Upon referral or certification of any matter under section 354(b), the Judicial Conference, after consideration of the prior proceedings and such additional investigation as it considers appropriate, shall by majority vote take such action, as described in section 354(a)(1)(C) and (2), as it considers appropriate.

(b) If Impeachment Warranted.—

(1) In general.—If the Judicial Conference concurs in the determination of the judicial council, or makes its own determination, that consideration of impeachment may be warranted, it shall so certify and transmit the determination and the record of proceedings to the House of Representatives for whatever action the House of Representatives considers to be necessary. Upon receipt of the determination and record of proceedings in the House of Representatives, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make available to the public the determination and any reasons for the determination.

(2) In case of felony conviction.—If a judge has been convicted of a felony under State or Federal law and has exhausted all means of obtaining direct review of the conviction, or the time for seeking further direct review of the conviction has passed and no such review has been sought, the Judicial Conference may, by majority vote and without referral or certification under section 354(b), transmit to the House of Representatives a determination that consideration of impeachment may be warranted, together with appropriate court records, for whatever action the House of Representatives considers to be necessary.

(Added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, §11042(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1852.)
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

101 Marietta St., Suite 2900, Atlanta, GA 30323

Tel. 404-331-5503 or 7878

No: II-97-12 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark (404) 331-5503 (Tuesday, January 21, 1997)

Roger Hannah (404) 331-7878

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION CHAIRMAN TO VISIT TURKEY POINT

Will Meet With Press at 1:00 P.M. at The Site

The Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Dr.

Shirley Ann Jackson, will visit Florida Power & Light Company's

Turkey Point nuclear power plant near Homestead on Friday, January

24 and will be available to meet with interested media

representatives at 1:00 p.m. (est) in the plant administration

building.

She will meet with the NRC's resident inspectors and hold

discussions with FP&L officials concerning operations at the

company's nuclear facilities, along with a working tour of Turkey

Point.

Dr. Jackson is a theoretical physicist who became an NRC

commissioner on May 2, 1995 and was named Chairman two months later

on July 1. She earned a Bachelor of Science degree in physics in

1968 and a Ph.D. in the field of theoretical elementary particle

physics in 1973, both from the Massachusetts Institute of

Technology. She conducted research in theoretical physics, solid

state and quantum physics, and optical physics for a number of years

at AT&T Bell Laboratories and was a Professor of Physics at Rutgers

University when appointed to the NRC.

She is the first African-American woman to receive a doctorate

from MIT, the first African-American to become an NRC commissioner

and the first woman and the first African-American to serve as NRC

Chairman.

#
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO.: 1:20-CV-22937-UU 

WINDY LUCIUS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HOOTERS OF AMERICA, LLC, 

Defendant. 

_______________________________/ 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the parties have reached a full settlement in the abovereferenced case which will resolve the case in its entirety as to all parties. The parties are 

working on settlement documents. The parties accordingly request 30 days to submit the 

settlement paperwork. The Parties request that all other deadlines be cancelled or stayed while 

the settlement documents are completed. 

Dated: August 7, 2020 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Mendy Halberstam 

E-mail: mendy.halberstam@jacksonlewis.com 

Florida Bar No. 68999 

JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 

One Biscayne Tower, Suite 3500 

Two South Biscayne Boulevard 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 577-7600 

Facsimile: (305) 373-4466 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Case 1:20-cv-22937-UU Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2020 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO.: 1:20-CV-22937-UU 

2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August 7, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List via 

transmission of Notice of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF and Electronic Mail. 

 s/ Mendy Halberstam 

 Mendy Halberstam, Esq. 

SERVICE LIST 

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 

Windy Lucius v. Hooters of America, LLC 

Case No. 1:20-CV-22937-UU

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq. 

Fla. Bar No. 628166 

E-mail: cc@cunninghampllc.com

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201 

Miami, FL 33156 

Telephone: (305) 351-2014 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Mendy Halberstam, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 68999 

E-mail: mendy.halberstam@jacksonlewis.com 

JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 

One Biscayne Tower, Suite 3500 

2 South Biscayne Boulevard 

Miami, FL 33131 

Telephone: 305-577-7600 

Facsimile: 305-373-4466 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Case 1:20-cv-22937-UU Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2020 Page 2 of 2
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 138

**Question 138:** Although it is extremely unlikely, long-lived residual radioactive material in the body of a female worker from her previous employment could deliver a dose exceeding the limit to a subsequently conceived embryo / fetus. For example, a former DOE worker who had been involved in an accident could have a large americium or plutonium body burden. 10 CFR 20.1208 makes no special provision for this eventuality. What action would the NRC expect the licensee to take?

**Answer:** The answer to this question is provided in Regulatory Guide 8.36, "Radiation Dose to the Embryo / Fetus," which indicates that if monitoring of a declared pregnant woman is required, the existing body burden must be included in determining the embryo / fetus dose. If the licensee determines that the dose to the embryo / fetus has exceeded 0.5 rem, or is within 0.05 rem of the dose limit by the time the woman declares her pregnancy, the licensee may allow the embryo / fetus to receive an additional 0.05 rem during the remainder of her pregnancy. If the prior body burden alone caused a dose to the embryo / fetus in excess of the limit, that dose should be recorded, but the NRC would not take enforcement actions for this "overexposure" provided that the licensee does not allow the embryo / fetus to receive more than 0.05 rem after the woman has declared her pregnancy. See the answer to the related Question 120. That answer states that the intent of 10 CFR 20.1208 (d) is that the licensee should not be in violation of the limit for the embryo / fetus as a result of doses received by the embryo / fetus before the woman declared her pregnancy or doses received as a result of intakes before that declaration was made. 

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1208)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, November 07, 2017
Case 0:20-cv-61221-RKA Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case 0:20-cv-61221-RKA Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### § 44.10 What is the purpose of this subpart?

This subpart sets forth procedures the Department of the Interior uses in disbursing Federal payments in lieu of taxes to local governments for entitlement lands within their boundaries.
### §§1551 to 1555. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–220, title I, §199(b)(2), Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1059

Section 1551, Pub. L. 97–300, title I, §141, Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1343; Pub. L. 97–404, §1(f), Dec. 31, 1982, 96 Stat. 2026; Pub. L. 100–77, title VII, §740(b), July 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 531; Pub. L. 102–367, title I, §131, Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1042; Pub. L. 102–484, div. D, title XLIV, §4467(f), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2751; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XIII, §1336, Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1805, related to general program requirements for service delivery system.

Section 1552, Pub. L. 97–300, title I, §142, Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1345; Pub. L. 97–404, §1(g), Dec. 31, 1982, 96 Stat. 2026; Pub. L. 102–367, title I, §132, Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1045, related to benefits for participating individuals.

Section 1553, Pub. L. 97–300, title I, §143, Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1345; Pub. L. 97–404, §1(h), Dec. 31, 1982, 96 Stat. 2026; Pub. L. 102–367, title I, §133, Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1045, related to labor standards.

Section 1554, Pub. L. 97–300, title I, §144, Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1346; Pub. L. 102–367, title I, §134(a), Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1045, related to grievance procedure.

Section 1555, Pub. L. 97–300, title I, §145, Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1347, prohibited Federal control of education.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 2000, see section 199(c)(2)(B) of Pub. L. 105–220, set out as a note under section 1501 of this title.