alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §215. Labeling requirement

#### (a) Statement required on container

On and after the expiration of the 12-month period following November 18, 1988, it shall be unlawful for any person to manufacture, import, or bottle for sale or distribution in the United States any alcoholic beverage unless the container of such beverage bears the following statement:

**"GOVERNMENT WARNING:** (1) According to the Surgeon General, women should not drink alcoholic beverages during pregnancy because of the risk of birth defects. (2) Consumption of alcoholic beverages impairs your ability to drive a car or operate machinery, and may cause health problems.".

#### (b) Conspicuous and prominent location of statement on container

The statement required by subsection (a) of this section shall be located in a conspicuous and prominent place on the container of such beverage, as determined by the Secretary, shall be in type of a size determined by the Secretary, and shall appear on a contrasting background. The Secretary shall make such determinations within 90 days after November 18, 1988.

#### (c) Alcoholic beverages intended for export; beverages intended for Armed Forces of the United States

Subsection (a) of this section shall not apply with respect to alcoholic beverages that are manufactured, imported, bottled, or labeled for export from the United States, or for delivery to a vessel or aircraft, as supplies, for consumption beyond the jurisdiction of the internal revenue laws of the United States: Provided, That this exemption shall not apply with respect to alcoholic beverages that are manufactured, imported, bottled, or labeled for sale, distribution, or shipment to members or units of the Armed Forces of the United States, including those located outside the United States.

#### (d) Powers of Secretary; rules and regulations; consultation and coordination with Surgeon General

The Secretary shall—

(1) have the power to—

(A) ensure the enforcement of the provisions of this subchapter, and

(B) issue regulations to carry out this subchapter, and

(2) consult and coordinate the health awareness efforts of the labeling requirements of this subchapter with the Surgeon General of the United States.

(Aug. 29, 1935, ch. 814, title II, §204, as added Pub. L. 100–690, title VIII, §8001(a)(3), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4519.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The internal revenue laws of the United States, referred to in subsec. (c), are classified generally to Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
### Part B—Additional State Responsibilities
§ 131.350 Selection and retention of the WBC Program Director. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) The WBC Program Director selected to manage the daily operations of the WBC shall possess core competencies in the areas of business and/or entrepreneurship training, project and/or small business management, effective communication, and collaboration.
( 2 ) ( i ) The recipient organization must provide written notification to the AA/OWBO or his/her designee within five business days following a vacancy in a WBC Program Director position. The notification must include the date the former WBC Program Director vacated the position, as well as the name, resume, salary, date of appointment, and contact information for the person assigned the role of the WBC Interim Program Director. If the WBC Program Director temporarily vacates the position, the notification must include the projected date of return. The placement of an Interim Program Director does not require the submission of a key personnel change request; however, the information outlined in this section must be submitted to the OWBO Program Analyst, via email, consistent with the required timeframe.
( ii ) The Interim Director may not remain in the position more than 90 calendar days from the date of the vacancy without written approval from the AA/OWBO. The recipient organization must document the appointment of the Interim Program Director in accordance with its policies and procedures and the cooperative agreement.
( 3 ) An Interim Program Director must allocate a sufficient amount of his/her time and effort to management of the daily operations of the WBC program until a permanent WBC Program Director is in position.
( 4 ) Within 30 days from the date of the vacancy, the recipient organization must provide OWBO with its plan of how it will ensure that a full-time WBC Program Director is hired within the 90 day timeframe allocated.
( 5 ) If it is anticipated that the Interim Program Director will be in the position for more than 90 days, prior to the end of the 90 day period, the recipient organization must submit a written request to the OWBO Program Analyst for approval of an extension. OWBO is not required to reimburse personnel costs for any WBC Interim Program Director that remains in the position for more than 90 days without prior written approval.
( b ) *SBA involvement.* The AA/OWBO will review the selection of the new WBC Program Director submitted by the recipient organization to ensure the candidate selected is qualified and their hiring would not present a conflict of interest or similar concern that would negatively affect the WBC's ability to carry out project and program objectives.
( c ) *Recruitment activity and associated costs.* Allocable personnel compensation and benefits costs are as provided in 2 CFR 200.463.
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 9:52 AM

To: 'kevin@burgermedia.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Request for Additional Information: Burger Media, Inc. (FAA-2015-1796)

July 30, 2015 

Dear Mr. Burger: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-1796). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by 

Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and 

remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the 

requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by August 13, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 423

**Question 423:** Standard Technical Specification (STS) 6.12 for nuclear power reactors provides methods for control of access to high radiation areas that are alternatives to the methods specified in a CFR Part 20. Power reactor licensees that have adopted this technical specification are required to provide additional controls for access to high radiation areas with dose rates greater than 1 rem/h in addition to the controls required for access to high radiation areas with dose rates of 1 rem/h or less. Providing the additional controls at 1 rem/h is conservative relative to providing additional controls for areas having dose rates of 500 rads or more in an hour as required for very high radiation areas by 10 CFR 20.1602. Do licensees that have adopted STS 6.12, and that are providing the additional controls required by this STS for areas with dose rates greater than 1 rem per hour or less, have to provide additional controls for very high radiation areas in accordance with 10 CFR 20.1602?

**Answer:** Yes, they do. The alternative controls for high radiation areas in STS 6.12 do not apply to the new requirement in 10 CFR 20.1602 to provide additional controls for very high radiation areas. The compensatory measures in the STS that provide alternative methods of control for areas with dose rates greater than 100 mrem per hour but less than 1000 mrem per hour do not constitute adequate controls over access to very high radiation areas.

(References: 10 CFR 20.1601, 10 CFR 20.1602, Reactor Technical Specifications)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
#### Richmond Assets Collecting Company, Appellant, v. Dellora R. Gates, as Executrix, etc., Respondent, Impleaded with Charles W. Morse and Others, Defendants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 25

**Question 25:** Does the definition of a "member of the public" mean "all" individuals? If so why is the exception statement added to the definition?

**Answer:** No. A particular individual can be a "member of the public" at some times and not at others. For example, an individual who works at a nuclear power plant and receives an "occupational dose" is not a member of the public while at work, but is a "member of the public" during off-hours at home.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1003)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 24, 2017
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Yosemite
National Park
California


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Visitation Statistics
 This table shows average visitation to Yosemite National Park. Although the park is open all year, nearly 75% of visitors come during the busiest six months (May through October). These numbers are averages from 2001 through 2016.
If you're looking for more in-depth statistics for Yosemite or other national parks, you can get them from the National Park Service visitor use statistics website.
**Month**
**% of visitors**
**# of visitors****January**
3%
108,026**February**
3%
112,897**March**
4%
153,289**April**
6%
224,276**May**
10%
353,062**June**
13%
488,594**July**
16%
592,990**August**
16%
600,349**September**
13%
465,231**October**
9%
327,667**November**
4%
158,278**December**
3%
118,889
 Last updated: August 11, 2017
 Park footer Contact Info Phone: 209/372-0200 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2004N-0079]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Specific Requirements on Content and 
Format of Labeling for Human Prescription Drugs of Geriatric Use 
Subsection in the Labeling

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Specific Requirements on Content 
and Format of Labeling for Human Prescription Drugs of Geriatric Use 
Subsection in the Labeling'' has been approved by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Nelson, Office of Management 
Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1482.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of June 22, 2004 (69 
FR 34682), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0370. 
The approval expires on September 30, 2007. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: October 4, 2004.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22764 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
#### June Krieger, Respondent, v. Jesse Krieger, Appellant.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment in an action to annul a marriage. The Special Term denied the motion. Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Russell, JJ.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 52

**Question 52:** Since the technical specification "exemptions" for nuclear power reactors already apply to locking of high radiation areas, does this "exemption" continue to apply pursuant to 10 CFR 20.1008 (d) if a 45-cm 18-inch) survey distance is specified (in technical specifications) versus the rule's 30-cm distance (10 CFR 20.1601 (a))?

**Answer:** The provisions of power reactor technical specifications for control of high radiation areas are not "exemptions" from the regulations. They are alternative methods of control provided in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 20.203 (c) (5). Under the revised Part 20 these technical specifications will continue to apply to the control of high radiation areas (but not very high radiation areas) until they are changed. These technical specifications refer to a high radiation area as defined in Part 20. When revised Part 20 is implemented, the revised definition of a high radiation area, using the 30-cm distance, will apply. Thus to determine the boundaries of the high radiation area, the 30-cm (12-in.) distance will be used. However, within the boundaries of that area the less-restrictive 45-cm (18-in.) distance specified in the technical specifications will be used to determine whether the radiation exposure is less than, equal to, or greater than 1,000 mR/h, the exposure rate used in the technical specifications to define the degree of control required. Changes in the technical specifications to be proposed by the NRC staff will include a change from 45 cm to 30 cm for the specified distance.

(References: 20.1601, 10 CFR 20.1602, Reactor Technical Specifications)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Hike the La Jara Trail

Valles Caldera National Preserve
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOURTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 9:20-cv-81002-RS

NELSON FERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

J. ALEXANDER’S RESTAURANTS, LLC,

A foreign limited liability company,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

Pursuant to Local Rule 16.4, the parties hereby notify the Court that they have reached an 

agreement in principal to resolve any and all claims pending in this matter. The matter will be 

finalized within the next 10 business days. 

Respectfully submitted:

RILEY WARNOCK & JACOBSON, PLC

1906 West End Avenue

Nashville, TN 37211

Tel: (615) 320-3700

Fax: (615) 320-3737

twarnock@rwjplc.com

kcloud@rwjplc.com

Attorneys for Defendant J. Alexander’s 

Restaurants, LLC

By: /s/ Timothy L. Warnock

TIMOTHY L. WARNOCK

Florida Bar No. 0850489

KATHARINE R. CLOUD

Pro Hac Vice Motion Forthcoming

Case 9:20-cv-81002-RS Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 14, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of Court by using the CM/ECF system. I also certify that the foregoing document is 

being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified below in the Service List 

in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by 

CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized 

to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

By: /s/ Timothy L. Warnock

Timothy L. Warnock

SERVICE LIST:

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

Counsel for Plaintiff

8751 W. Broward Blvd., Suite 303

Plantation, FL 33324

rhannah@rhannahlaw.com

LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

4640 N.W. 7th Street

Miami, FL 33126-2309

duranandassociates@gmail.com

Case 9:20-cv-81002-RS Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2020 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of MedicalCV, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, John H. Jungbauer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
| Dated: July 20, 2006 | By:    | /s/ John H. Jungbauer           |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                      |   | John H. Jungbauer               |
|                      |   | Principal Financial Officer and |
|                      |   | Principal Accounting Officer    |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse L. CAGE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-30978.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 7, 2006.

Diane Hollenshead Copes, Assistant U.S. Attorney, William P. Gibbens, U.S. Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Dwight M. Doskey, Dwight Doskey, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jesse L. Cage, federal prisoner #22766-034, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence challenging his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine hydrochloride. The district court granted Cage a certificate of appealability on the issue of whether his counsel was ineffective for not seeking to suppress wiretap evidence on the ground that the wiretap *884authorization violated state law, thereby preserving the issue for appeal. Cage argues that he is entitled to relief on this issue because his counsel should have spotted the issue and because the result of his trial would have been different if the wiretap evidence had been suppressed.

In the appeal from the denial of the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed by Cage’s co-defendant, Calvin Brown, Jr., this court addressed the same issue that is raised in this case. *See United States v. Brown,*111 Fed. Appx. 269, 270-72 (5th Cir.2004) (unpublished). For the reasons set forth in that decision, Cage has not shown that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. *See id.*at 271-72.

AFFIRMED.

*

**Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### In the Matter of Hinzmann & Waldmann, Inc., Appellant. Edward Corsi, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Santry, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1009.]
**Exhibit99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Argosy Gaming Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James B. Perry, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  James B. Perry |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| James B. Perry           |
| Chief Executive Officer  |
| August  12, 2002    |

 

----
### §1915A. Screening

(a) Screening.—The court shall review, before docketing, if feasible or, in any event, as soon as practicable after docketing, a complaint in a civil action in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.

(b) Grounds for Dismissal.—On review, the court shall identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint—

(1) is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or

(2) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.

(c) Definition.—As used in this section, the term "prisoner" means any person incarcerated or detained in any facility who is accused of, convicted of, sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the terms and conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or diversionary program.

(Added Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101[(a)] [title VIII, §805(a)], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321, 1321–75; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.)