alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#####  

**Exhibit 31**

AMANASU ENVIRONMENT**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer				Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act				As Adopted Pursuant to				Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

			I, Atsushi Maki, certify that:

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Amanasu Environment Corporation;
-  					Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a					material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,					in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading					with respect to the period covered by this annual report;				 
-  					Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included					in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,					results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented					in this annual report;				 
-  					I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures					(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:				 
							designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material							information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,							is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the							period in which this annual report is being prepared;						
							evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and							procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this							annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and						
							presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness							of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of							the Evaluation Date;						

-  					I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors					and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the					equivalent function):				 
							all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls							which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,							summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's							auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and						
							any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees							who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and						

-  					I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant					changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect					internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including					any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.				 

 Dated: April 13, 2008
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 86

**Question 86:** Does the term "per unit intake" in Footnote 1 to §20.1202 refer to one event or to the entire monitoring period?

**Answer:**The term "per unit intake" does not refer to any particular time period. However, §20.1202, to which Footnote 1 refers, provides a comparison to an annual limit. Thus, the time period of concern in this footnote is the "year" as defined in 10 CFR 20.1003.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1202 Footnote 1)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, December 13, 2017
Wage and Hour Division

Summary of Unpaid Wages U.S. Department of Labor

1. Name

Office Address:

2. Address

3. Period Covered

4. Act(s)

Employer Fed Tax ID Number:

Investigator: Date:

by Work Week 5. BWs Due

Ending Dates

6. LDs Due Total

Employer Name and Address: Subtotal:

Signed:

Form WH-56

Case ID: Page 1

Total:

Date:

I agree to pay the listed employees the 

amount due shown above by Employer Name and Address: Subtotal:

Signed:

Form WH-56

Case ID: Page 1

Total:

Date:

I agree to pay the listed employees the 

amount due shown above by 

Case 1:20-cv-22603-JG Document 167-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2023 Page 1 of 1
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Women's Rights
National Historical ParkNew York
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark R. Richards, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of Paperweight Development Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Paperweight Development Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 17, 2006



|           |  |                                                
|---------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Signature: |  | /s/ Mark R. Richards                           
|           |  | Mark R. Richards                               
|           |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 128.304 Can an Applicant appeal SBA's initial decision to deny an application?

An Applicant may appeal SBA's decision to deny an application for certification as a VOSB or SDVOSB by filing an appeal with the SBA's Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) in accordance with part 134 of this chapter. A denial or decertification based on the failure to provide sufficient evidence of the qualifying individual's status as a veteran or a service-disabled veteran is not subject to appeal to OHA.
### RE: Northshore test data Northshore test data Jiang, Hongming Hongming Hongming

( MPCA ) to: Kathleen Dagostino 10/24/2012 11:18 AM History: This message has been replied to.

2 attachments

EPA_P_V5.doc EPA_P_V5.doc Epa_cvr.doc

Epa_cvr.doc



### Kathleen:

Hope these help (Table 34, pp. 76-77 of the 1st file). Let me know either way. Thanks! - Hongming Jiang, Ph.D., P.E.
Industrial Division Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 (651)757-2467 (voice) (651)296-8717 (fax) hongming. jiang @state.mn.us For MPCA info, click at www.pca.state.mn.us

From: Dagostino.Kathleen@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Dagostino.Kathleen@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 9:29 AM To : Jiang, Hongming (MPCA) Cc: Cervak.Sarah@epamail.epa.gov; Rosenthal.Steven@EPA.GOV Subject: Northshore test data

**Can you send me the 1994 stack test data for Northshore that you used to set your SO2 BART limits. Northshore did not provide us with this data**  **when we sent them the 114 letter. I only have 2008 stack test data for**  **SV266. Thanks for your help.**

**______________________ Kathleen D'Agostino**  **Environmental Engineer U.S. EPA - Region 5**  **Phone: (312) 886-1767 email:**  **dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics).

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Threat Reduction Advisory Committee will meet in closed session on Thursday, December 2, 2004, at the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA), and on Friday, December 3, 2004, in the Pentagon, Washington, DC.

The mission of the Committee is to advise the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics) on combating weapons of mass destruction, chemical and biological defense, transformation of the nuclear deterrence, and other matters related to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency's mission.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix II), it has been determined that this Committee meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that accordingly the meeting will be closed to the public.

# DATES:

Thursday, December 2, 2004, (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.) and Friday, December 3, 2004, (8 a.m. to 9:20 a.m.)

# ADDRESSES:

                        Institute for Defense Analyses, Board Room, 4850 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia and the USD(AT&L) Conference Room                               ( print page 61225)                            (3D1019), the Pentagon, Washington, DC.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lieutenant Colonel Don Culp, USAF, Defense Threat Reduction Agency/AST, 8725 John J. Kingman Road MS 6201, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6201, Phone: (703) 767-5717.

Dated: October 7, 2004.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 04-23117 Filed 10-14-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
§ 4.1123 Notice of hearing. ( a ) An administrative law judge shall give notice to the parties of the time, place and nature of any hearing.
( b ) Except for expedited review proceedings and temporary relief proceedings where time is of the essence, notice given under this section shall be in writing.
( c ) In an expedited proceeding when there is only opportunity to give oral notice, the administrative law judge shall enter that fact contemporaneously on the record by a signed and dated memorandum describing the notice given.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6585

WALTER DUANE WHITE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

PUSHP K. CLAUDIUS; FREDDIE GORRIDO; SAMUEL L. BATTS; D. R. 

STEPHENS,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, 

District Judge. (5:09-ct-03191-D)

Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 21, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam 

opinion.

Walter Duane White, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Walter Duane White seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying his motion for the appointment of counsel 

and his motion for a preliminary injunction in this Bivens*

DISMISSED IN PART;

action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-46 (1949). The court’s denial of White’s motion for 

appointment of counsel is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

dismiss that portion of White’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

As for the denial White’s motion for a preliminary injunction, 

we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. White v. Claudius, No. 5:09-ct-03191-D (E.D.N.C. 

Apr. 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED IN PART

 * Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of 

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Annual report of Fellows Energy Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form
10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brooke E.
Horspool, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Fellows Energy Ltd. and will be retained by Fellows Energy Ltd. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
      March 13, 2009
            By:
      /s/ BROOKE E. HORSPOOLBrooke
      E. HorspoolChief
      Financial Officer
#### § 4.1291 Where to file; time for filing.

The petition for an award of costs and expenses including attorneys' fees must be filed with the administrative law judge who issued the final order, or if the final order was issued by the Board, with the Board, within 45 days of receipt of such order. Failure to make a timely filing of the petition may constitute a waiver of the right to such an award.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5196 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5196

    To authorize the location of a monument on the National Mall to 
commemorate and honor the women's suffrage movement and the passage of 
    the 19th Amendment to the Constitution, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2022

 Ms. Baldwin (for herself, Mrs. Blackburn, and Mr. Bennet) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                    on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the location of a monument on the National Mall to 
commemorate and honor the women's suffrage movement and the passage of 
    the 19th Amendment to the Constitution, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Women's Suffrage National Monument 
Location Act''.

SEC. 2. WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE NATIONAL MONUMENT.

    (a) Site.--Notwithstanding section 8908(c) of title 40, United 
States Code, the Women's Suffrage National Monument shall be located 
within the Reserve.
    (b) Applicability of Commemorative Works Act.--Except as provided 
in subsection (a), chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code (commonly 
known as the ``Commemorative Works Act''), shall apply to the Women's 
Suffrage National Monument.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Women's suffrage national monument.--The term ``Women's 
        Suffrage National Monument'' means the commemorative work 
        authorized to be established under Public Law 116-217 (40 
        U.S.C. 8903 note).
            (2) Reserve.--The term ``Reserve'' has the meaning given 
        such term in section 8902(a)(3) of title 40, United States 
        Code.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 8200.0-1 Purpose.

This part 8200 provides procedures and practices for the management and use of public lands that have ecological or other natural history values of scientific interest.
#### Violet G. Mayer, Respondent, v. Siegfried Mayer, Appellant.

Order unanimously modified by reducing alimony to $75 per week and counsel fee to $1,500, and by allowing $500 for expenses, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Mo opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
1 

### Hunt, Jeff

From: Johnston, Jeff (ECY) [jefj461@ECY.WA.GOV]

Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 10:15 AM

To: Hunt, Jeff

Cc: sclo461@ECY.WA.gov; Otterson, Sally (ECY); Perez, Richelle (ECY)

Subject: Tacoma-Pierce 2008 EI - supporting emails

Attachments: FW: Request for 2011 State of Washington Da ta 2 of 3; FW: 2011 Data Request for

Washington State 1 of 3; FW: UPRR Estimat ed Fuel Consumption Washington State 2011 3

of 3

Jeff,

As a follow

‐ up to our discussion about the locomotive emissions in the Tacoma

‐ Pierce County PM2.5 nonattainment

area emissions inventory, I’ve attached the 3 emails and their attachments cited in the emissions inventory endnotes

(endnotes 26, 27 and 28).

You also asked for a brief description of how the emissions were calculated, based on the information provided by the

rail companies.

UPRR (minus SO2) and BNSF submitted emissions for calendar year 2008 and were broken up into Line Haul and Yard

Locomotives where applicable. Amtrak submitted track and fuel consumption data for 2008 and emissions were

calculated using EPA’s Emission Factors for Locomotives (EPA

‐ 420

‐ F

‐ 09

‐ 025).

SO2 emissions were estimated for both UPRR and Amtrak using EPA’s Emission Factors for Locomotives (EPA

‐ 420

‐ F

‐ 09

‐ 025) equation:



### SO

2 

### (g/gal)

= (fuel density) × (conversion factor) × (64 g SO

2 

### /32 g S) × (S content of fuel)

The fuel density and sulfur content of fuel are based on inputs described in the NONROAD technical document NR

‐

009c ( http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/ nonrdmdl/nonrdmdl2004/420p04009.pdf ).

Total emissions can be calculated by multiplying the emission factors (in g/gal) by the fuel consumption rates (in million

‐ gal/yr) to give annual emission rates (in metric tons per year). Multiplying this metric estimate by 1.102 gives standard

U.S. tons (or short tons) per year (EPA

‐ 420

‐ F

‐ 09

‐ 025).

I hope this provides the information you’re looking for. Please contact me or Sarah Clouse if you have any questions

about this information.

Best,

Jeff

_____________________________________________________________________________________ Jeff Johnston, Ph.D. | Manager, Sc ience & Engineering Section

Air Quality Program | Washington Department of Ecology

jeff.johnston@ecy.wa.gov | 360.407.6115 | Cell 360.628-4511 | Fax 360.407.7534

PO Box 47600 | Olympia, WA 98504-7600 | STREET: 300 Desmond Drive SE | Lacey, WA 98503-1274
### 2005 Aircraft 10.7854 tons PM2,5

General 19.63854 tons NO X

2.342928 tons S0 2 

### Marine 20.430 tons PM2,5



### Port 714.781 tons NO X

42.146 tons SO Z

6.370 tons PM2,5 

### Underway 223.033 tons NO X

13.151 tons SO z

26.800 tons PM2,5 Total 937.814 tons NO X

55.297 tons SO Z 

### Railroad 11.850 tons PM2,5



### Yard 390.198 tons NO X

32.332 tons S0 2

37.720 tons PM2,5 

### Line Haul

- Class 1 1,374.690 tons NO X 94.444 tons SO z

49.570 tons P012,5 Total 1,764.888 tons NO X

126.777 tons S02
#### §§ 9260.0-4-9260.0-6 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.710 Who can file a response to an appeal petition and when must such a response be filed?

Although not required, any person served with an appeal petition may file and serve a response supporting or opposing the appeal if he or she wishes to do so. If a person decides to file a response, the response must be filed within seven (7) business days after service of the appeal petition. The response should present argument.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

HARRY J. LAFFERTY, MICHAEL D. KIRN, ROBERT T. KIRN, JOHN J. ROEDELL, JOHN M. FERRIS, AND ROBERT F. FERRIS,

Petitioners

v.

THOMAS D. FERRIS,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 878 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of May, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 20-61253-CIV-SINGHAL

DOUG LONGHINI,

Plaintiff,

v.

PNS STORES, INC. d/b/a BIG LOTS,

Defendant.

__________________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal 

with Prejudice (DE [16]). The Court having reviewed the stipulation and being otherwise 

fully advised in the premises, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this cause shall stand DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed 

to CLOSE this case and DENY AS MOOT any pending motions.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 30th day of

September 2020.

Copies furnished to counsel of record via CM/ECF

Case 0:20-cv-61253-AHS Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2020 Page 1 of 1