alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 500.204 Loan terms. ( a ) All loans guaranteed under the Program shall be due and payable in full no later than December 31, 2010.
( b ) Loans guaranteed under the Program must bear a rate of interest determined by the Board to be reasonable. The reasonableness of an interest rate will be determined with respect to current average yields on outstanding obligations of the United States with remaining periods of maturity comparable to the term of the loan sought to be guaranteed. The Board may reject an application to guarantee a loan if it determines the interest rate of such loan to be unreasonable.
( c ) ( 1 ) The performance of all of the Borrower's obligations under the Loan Documents shall be secured by, and shall have the priority in, such Security as provided for within the terms and conditions of the Guarantee.
( 2 ) Without limiting the Lender's or Borrower's obligations under paragraph (c) of this section, at a minimum, the loan shall be secured by: ( i ) A fully perfected and enforceable security interest and or lien, with first priority over conflicting security interests or other liens in all property acquired, improved, or derived from the loan funds; and
( ii ) A fully perfected and enforceable security interest and or lien in any other property of the Borrower's pledged to secure the loan, including accessions, replacements, proceeds, or property given by a third party as Security for the loan, the priority of which shall be, at a minimum, equal in status with the existing highest voluntarily granted or acquired interest or lien;
( 3 ) The entire loan will be secured by the same Security with equal lien priority for the guaranteed and the unguaranteed portions of the loan. The unguaranteed portion of the loan will neither be paid first nor given any preference over the guaranteed portion.
( 4 ) An Applicant's compliance with paragraph (c)(2) of this section does not assure a finding of reasonable assurance of repayment, or assure the Board's Guarantee of the loan.
( d ) An eligible Lender may assess and collect from the Borrower such other fees and costs associated with the application and origination of the loan as are reasonable and customary, taking into consideration the amount and complexity of the credit. The Board may take such other fees and costs into consideration when determining whether to offer a Guarantee to the Lender.
[64 FR 57947, Oct. 27, 1999, as amended at 64 FR 72024, Dec. 23, 1999]
§ 142.35 How does the Administrator dispose of an appeal? ( a ) The Administrator may affirm, reduce, reverse, compromise, remand, or settle any penalty or assessment imposed by the ALJ in the initial decision or reconsideration decision.
( b ) The Administrator will promptly serve each party to the appeal and the ALJ with a copy of his or her decision. This decision must contain a statement describing the right of any person, against whom a penalty or assessment has been made, to seek judicial review.
#### § 7.12 Relationship to section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.

Issuance of a permit in accordance with the Act and this part does not constitute an undertaking requiring compliance with section 106 of the Act of October 15, 1966 (16 U.S.C. 470f). However, the mere issuance of such a permit does not excuse the Federal land manager from compliance with section 106 where otherwise required.
### [§7236. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–490, §3(b)(1), Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1466]

Section, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 860, set out acts and penalties for violations of laws relating to filled cheese.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to filled cheese manufactured, imported, or sold after Oct. 26, 1974, see section 3(c) of Pub. L. 93–490, set out as a note under sections 4831 to 4834 of this title.
#### Samuel Anzelowitz, an Infant, by Jacob Anzelowitz, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Tepol Realty Corporation, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### § 107.1170 Maximum amount of Participating Securities for any Licensee.

The maximum amount of Participating Securities you may have outstanding at any time is 200 percent of your Leverageable Capital. If you are a Section 301(d) Licensee, the maximum combined amount of Participating Securities and Preferred Securities you may have outstanding at any time is 200 percent of your Leverageable Capital.
#### Clayton Howard TISDALE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CONWAY HOSPITAL; Loris Community Hospital, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 05-7423.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 23, 2006.

Decided: March 2, 2006.

Clayton Howard Tisdale, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Clayton Tisdale seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Tisdale that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Tisdale failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. *See Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir.1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Tisdale has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

DATE: March 14, 2024

CASE OF: IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA FAMILY LAW 

RULES OF PROCEDURE - FORMS 12.900(H) AND 

12.928

DOCKET NO.: SC2024-0072

OPINION FILED: February 22, 2024

ATTENTION: ALL PUBLISHERS

THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE IN THE 

ABOVE OPINION:

On p. 10, line 1, (C) was deleted before “61, Florida Statutes, other 

than simplified dissolution.”

On p. 10, line 2, (D) was changed to (C).

On p. 10, line 4, (E) was changed to (D).

On p. 10, line 6, (F) was changed to (E).

On p. 10, line 8, (G) was changed to (F).

On p. 10, line 10, (H) was changed to (G).

On p. 10, line 12, (I) was changed to (H).

On p. 10, line 17, (J) was changed to (I).

On p. 10, line 19, (K) was changed to(J).

On p. 10, line 21, (L) was changed to (K).

On p. 10, line 23, (M) was changed to (L).

On p. 10, line 25, (N) was changed to (M).

On p. 10, line 32, (O) was changed to (N).

On p. 10, line 35, (P) was changed to (O).

On p. 10, line 37, (Q) was changed to (P).

On p. 10, line 39, (R) was changed to (Q).

On p. 10, line 41, (S) was changed to (R).

On p. 10, line 42, (T) was changed to (S).

On p. 10, line 44, (U) was changed to (T).

On p. 11, line 1, (V) was changed to (U).

On p. 11, line 2, (W) was changed to (V).

On p. 11, line 4, (X) was changed to (W).
On p. 11, line 6, (Y) was changed to (X).

On p. 11, line 8, (Z) was changed to (Y).

SIGNED: OPINION CLERK
### §3011. Assessment of surcharge on a debt

(a) Surcharge Authorized.—In an action or proceeding under subchapter B or C, and subject to subsection (b), the United States is entitled to recover a surcharge of 10 percent of the amount of the debt in connection with the recovery of the debt, to cover the cost of processing and handling the litigation and enforcement under this chapter of the claim for such debt.

(b) Limitation.—Subsection (a) shall not apply if—

(1) the United States receives an attorney's fee in connection with the enforcement of the claim; or

(2) the law pursuant to which the action on the claim is based provides any other amount to cover such costs.

(Added Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVI, §3611, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4937.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Nov. 29, 1990, and applicable with respect to certain actions for debts owed the United States pending in court on that effective date, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101–647, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22936]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 4858]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Stubbs and the Horse''

    Summary: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Stubbs and the Horse'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Kimbell Art Museum, 
Fort Worth, Texas, from on or about November 14, 2004 to on or about 
February 6, 2005, and at the Walters Art Museum, Baltimore, Maryland, 
from on or about March 13, 2005 to on or about May 29, 2005, and at 
possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be 
published in the Federal Register.
    For Further Information Contact: For further information, including 
a list of the exhibit objects, contact Wolodymyr R. Sulzynsky, the 
Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State, (telephone: 202/619-
5078). The address is: Department of State, SA-44, and 301 4th Street, 
SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: October 1, 2004.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 04-22936 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
Exhibit 5.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Stephen G.
Snyder, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of TransAlta
Corporation;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;



4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;



b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and



5.

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and



b.

Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.







Dated:  March 29, 2005.





signed “S.G. Snyder”

Stephen G. Snyder

President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.1


                  STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          I, Ramesh C. Trivedi, Chief Executive Officer and President of
Integrated Surgical Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 12, 2003                        /s/ Ramesh C. Trivedi
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Ramesh C. Trivedi
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Integrated Surgical Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Integrated
Surgical Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



<PAGE>



                  STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          I, Charles J. Novak, Chief Financial Officer of Integrated Surgical
Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


          (1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and


          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 12, 2003                                 /s/ Charles J. Novak
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Charles J. Novak
                                                    Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Integrated Surgical Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Integrated
Surgical Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. *v.*Hardy, adm’x.

January 11, 1911.

Actióñ for damages. Before Judge Pite. T)ade superior court. December 6, 1909.

*J. P. Jacoway*and *Foust, Payne & Tatum,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. B. Arnold, Harvey Hill,*and *W. P. Cureion,*contra.

Holden, J.

Counsel for the plaintiff in error in their brief do not complain that any error was committed except in the overruling of the motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence and without evidence to support it, and refer to no other grounds of the motion. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and the *judgment*overruling- the *motion*for a new trial will not be reversed. • .

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.*
**Exhibit****31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Harry Brill,certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K of Gladstone Capital Corporation;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: December 14, 2004

 
| /s/ HARRY BRILL                        |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Harry Brill                            |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer and Treasurer |   |

 

 

 

----
1

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

James H. Davis d/b/a JD Minerals, Walter 

Allison Baen, Santos J. Dominguez and 

Dixie L. Hester,

 

 Appellants,

v.

COG Operating, LLC, Neal Brusenhan 

Properties, LP, Neal Brusenhan 

Management, LLC as General Partner of 

Neal Brusenhan Properties, LP, Robert L. 

Neal as Trustee of the Neal Robert L. 

Management Trust and Jessie Frances 

Neal,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00205-CV

Appeal from the

112

th District Court

of Upton County, Texas 

(TC# 18-04-U4615-OTH)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the Appellants’ unopposed motion to direct the district clerk 

to send original documents to the Court of Appeals. The motion is GRANTED. Therefore, the 

Court ORDERS the district clerk to forward the original Exhibits 66 through 67B inclusive, 

marked “confidential” and filed “under seal,” attached to Plaintiffs’ Traditional Motion for 

Summary Judgment filed on November 12, 2019. The original exhibits are due with this Court on 

or before February 2, 2021. The Court will return the original exhibits to the District Clerk of 
2

Upton County, Texas, after final disposition of this appeal. The Court will keep these files under 

seal pending review of this appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of January, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
#### Celia Morris, Individually and as a Stockholder of Morton Coal Co., Inc., v. Morton Wormser et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-12-0001007 

06-OCT-2014 

09:11 AM 

SCWC-12-0001007
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

STATE OF HAWAI'I,


Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
 

vs.
 

WILLIAM A. KERNSTOCK,


Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-12-0001007; 1DTA-12-03599)
 

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ 

of Certiorari, filed on September 15, 2014, is hereby accepted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be 

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant 

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move 

for retention of oral argument. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 6, 2014. 


Jonathan Burge

for petitioner
 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald


/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 


/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson