alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 108.1200 SBA's Leverage commitment to a NMVC Company—application procedure, amount, and term. ( a ) *General.* Under the provisions in §§ 108.1200 through 108.1240, you may apply for SBA's conditional commitment to reserve a specific amount and type of Leverage for your future use. You may then apply to draw down Leverage against the commitment.
( b ) *Applying for a Leverage commitment.* SBA will notify you when it is accepting requests for Leverage commitments. Upon receipt of your request, SBA will send you a complete application package.
( c ) *Limitations on the amount of a Leverage commitment.* The amount of a Leverage commitment must be a multiple of $5,000. SBA, in its discretion, may determine a minimum dollar amount for Leverage commitments. Any such minimum amounts will be published in Notices in the Federal Register from time to time.
( d ) *Term of Leverage commitment.* SBA's Leverage commitment will automatically lapse on the expiration date stated in the commitment letter issued to you by SBA.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

138734 

DEBRA R. WARREN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138734 

 COA: 289515 

WCAC: 08-000098 

DELPHI CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 26, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Thomas R. Moyes, Chief Financial Officer of MediCor Ltd. (the “Registrant”),certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrantand have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. Dated: September 20, 2004 /s/ Thomas R. Moyes
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 0:20-cv-61241-RUIZ

APRIL HICKS,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT LIST FOR TRIAL ON LIABILITY 

Defendant, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United 

States Attorney, hereby gives notice of compliance with the Court’s requirement announced during 

the telephonic conference held December 7, 2021, and in advance of the trial on liability only 

scheduled for January 24, 2022 [D.E. 71].1

Dated: January 3, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 

By: Mary Beth Ricke 

Monica L. Haddad 

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Florida Bar No. 99426

Email: Monica.Haddad@usdoj.gov

U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Florida

500 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Telephone: (561) 209-1004

and 

Mary Beth Ricke 

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Florida Bar No. 107213 

E-mail: Mary.Ricke@usdoj.gov

500 East Broward Blvd., Suite 700 

1 In the event the Court proceeds with the separate trial on damages, Defendant will file another 

Exhibit List naming additional exhibits previously listed in the Exhibit List filed December 6, 2021 

[D.E. 67].

Case 0:20-cv-61241-RAR Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/03/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 

Telephone: (954) 660-5137 

Counsel for Defendant, United States of America

Defense 

Number

Description of Exhibit May vs. Will 

Offer 

Objection(s) 

by Plaintiff

D-1 Photographs of accident scene and damaged 

vehicles (bates-stamped Hicks v. USA -- USA 

Production March 2021_000115-000134)

will

D-2 eRIMS and key (bates-stamped Hicks v. USA --

USA Production March 2021_000135-000138)

will LP, I, R, UP, 

H

D-3 Tow and repair receipt for repairs to USPS vehicle 

post-accident (bates-stamped Hicks v. USA -- USA 

Production March 2021_000101, 000112-000114)

will

D-4 BCSO body camera footage from date of Accident 

(bates-stamped Hicks v. USA -- USA Production 

March 2021_000139-000140)

may I, R, UP, H

D-5 Lauderhill Fire Rescue records for Plaintiff(bates 

stamped Hicks v USA_Subpoena records from 

Lauderhill Fire Rescue_00000-000013)

may I, R, UP, H

D-6 CV of Andrew J. Rentschler, Ph.D. may

D-7 Composite Exhibit of photographs and records 

reviewed by Dr. Andrew J. Rentschler

may I, R, UP, H

D-8 Expert Report of Dr. Andrew J. Rentschler may I, R, UP, H

D-9 Dr. Rentschler’s File Materials (Doc. Nos. 37-54) may

D-10 Dr. Rentschler Reference material (Doc. No. 54) may

D-22 SF 95 Claim form submitted by Plaintiff (batesstamped Hicks v. USA -- USA Production March 

2021_00001-000100)

will

D-24 Records from National Auto Lenders (batesstamped Hicks_Subpoena Records from National 

Auto Lenders_000001-000125)

may R

Case 0:20-cv-61241-RAR Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/03/2022 Page 2 of 2
118 STAT. 3888 PUBLIC LAW 108–466—DEC. 21, 2004

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3734:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108–596 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Sept. 22, considered and passed House.

Dec. 7, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–466

108th Congress

An Act

To designate the Federal building located at Fifth and Richardson Avenues in

Roswell, New Mexico, as the ‘‘Joe Skeen Federal Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building located at Fifth and Richardson Avenues

in Roswell, New Mexico, shall be known and designated as the

‘‘Joe Skeen Federal Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joe

Skeen Federal Building’’.

Approved December 21, 2004.

Dec. 21, 2004

[H.R. 3734]
#### § 404.30 How much Federal funding can Reclamation provide for the completion of an appraisal investigation?

In general, Reclamation will be responsible for 100 percent of the cost of an appraisal investigation conducted under § 404.11(a) or (b), up to $200,000. If the cost of the appraisal investigation exceeds $200,000, your cost-share will be 50 percent of the amount exceeding $200,000.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6131

SAMUEL WHALEY; WILLIAM BLACK; ROBERT CHADWICK; IVAN TURNER; ROBERT REPOVICH, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus EARL BESHEARS, Warden; BISHOP ROBINSON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-3965-S) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Whaley, William Black, Robert Chadwick, Ivan Turner, Robert Repovich, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Whaley v. Beshears , No. CA-95-3965-S (D. Md. Jan. 4, 1996).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Notice to Arriving

Student Travelers:

Help Protect

Agricultural and

Natural Resources

It takes only one piece of infested fruit or diseased

meat carried into the United States by an 

unsuspecting traveler to introduce harmful pests or

diseases such as Mediterranean fruit fly or

foot–and–mouth disease. Please be aware that

many agricultural products are prohibited from 

entering this country. The reason—they can harbor

pests and diseases that could devastate U.S. crops,

livestock, pets, and the environment. Failure to

declare prohibited items could result in long delays,

fines, and confiscation of the items. It’s easy to

assure a hassle–free travel experience; just declare

all agricultural products and leave prohibited products

behind. For more information, check the Animal and

Plant Health Inspection Service’s (APHIS) Web site

at www.aphis.usda.gov.

It is also important to remember that there are

restrictions on agricultural items sent through the

mail. Be careful in requesting packages from home

and inform friends and family to check before sending

agricultural items. The APHIS Web site provides

more information.

APHIS, part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture

(USDA), is an action–oriented agency that works with

the workforce of the U.S. Department of Homeland

Security’s Border and Transportation Security’s

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, other

Federal agencies, Congress, the States, agricultural

interests, and the general public to carry out its 

mission to protect the health and value of American

agriculture and natural resources.

APHIS’ mission is an integral part of USDA’s

efforts to provide the Nation with safe and affordable

food. Without APHIS protecting America's animal

and plant resources from agricultural pests and 

diseases, threats to our food supply and to our

Nation's economy would be enormous. Plant and

animal pest and disease threats could cost billions of

dollars in lost domestic and international markets

annually, as well as have a huge impact on U.S.

consumers. APHIS has aggressively worked to 

prevent and respond to these situations with great

success.

Factsheet

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service November 2003

APHIS

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination

in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national

origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to

all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative

means for communication of program information (Braille, large

print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at

(202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD).

To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of

Civil Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence

Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964

(voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and

employer.

United States Department of Agriculture • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service • Safeguarding American Agriculture
§ 108.420 Prohibition on exercise of ownership or Control rights in NMVC Company before SBA approval. Without prior written SBA approval, no change of ownership or Control may take effect and no officer, director, employee or other Person acting on your behalf shall: ( a ) Register on your books any transfer of ownership interest to the proposed new owner(s);
( b ) Permit the proposed new owner(s) to exercise voting rights with respect to such ownership interest (including directly or indirectly procuring or voting any proxy, consent or authorization as to such voting rights at any meeting of shareholders, partners or members);
( c ) Permit the proposed new owner(s) to participate in any manner in the conduct of your affairs (including exercising control over your books, records, funds or other assets; participating directly or indirectly in any disposition thereof; or serving as an officer, director, partner, manager, employee or agent); or
( d ) Allow ownership or Control to pass to another Person.
#### Robert Boris Beachboard *v.*The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York

*Robert Boris Beachboard,*pro se, in support of the petition.

*Paul F. Thomas,*in opposition.

Decided February 21, 1986

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 6 Conn. App. 43, is denied.
**EXHIBIT 10.10**

 

 

The LandmarkBancorp, Inc. Compensation Committee oversees the bonuses for allexecutive officers.  Individual bonusawards are made pursuant to an annual cash bonus plan that is recommended bythe Compensation Committee and was approved by the full board.  Potential bonus awards are based onachievement of certain objective criteria, including a minimum threshold of 4%earnings per share growth with 10% growth required to receive the maximum bonusamount related to earnings per share and a minimum threshold on return onaverage equity is 9% with the top tier of the goal at 12% and the return onaverage assets has minimum and maximum threshold of 0.8% and 1.25%respectively.  Additionally, theCompensation Committee and the board consider subjective performance measuresin addition to objective measures, which subjective component comprises up toforty percent of the potential bonus award for each executive officer.

 

 

----
§ 418.15 Operations monitoring. ( a ) The Bureau will work with the District to monitor Project operations and will perform field inspections of water distribution during the irrigation season. ( 1 ) Staff members of the Bureau's Lahontan Area Office and the District will meet as often as necessary during the irrigation season after each water distribution report has been prepared to examine the amounts of water used to that point in the season.
( 2 ) On the basis of the information obtained from field observations, water use records, and consultations with District staff, the Bureau will determine at monthly intervals whether the rate of diversion is consistent with this part for that year.
( 3 ) The District will be informed in writing of suggested adjustments that may be made in management of diversions and releases as necessary to achieve target efficiencies and stay within the MAD.
( b ) Project operations will be monitored in part by measuring flows at key locations. Specifically, Project diversions (used in the calculations under § 418.18 below) will be determined by: ( 1 ) Adding flows measured at: ( i ) Truckee Canal near Wadsworth—U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) gauge number 10351300;
( ii ) Carson River below Lahontan Dam—USGS gauge number 10312150;
( iii ) Rock Dam Ditch near the end of the concrete lining; and
( 2 ) Subtracting: ( i ) Flows measured at the Truckee Canal near Hazen—USGS gauge number 10351400;
( ii ) The Carson River at Tarzyn Road near Fallon (below Sagouspe Dam) for satisfying water rights outside of the Project boundaries as described in § 418.25, USGS gauge number 10312275;
( iii ) Estimated losses in the Truckee Canal; and
( iv ) Spills, precautionary drawdown, and incentive water released at Lahontan Dam under §§ 418.24 and 418.36.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.1707 Seller's retained Loan Interest.

The Seller must retain a 15% or greater Loan Interest in each of its loans included in a Pool. At Pool formation, the CSA will issue the Seller a Seller Receipt evidencing the Seller's retained ownership in the Pool Loan. With SBA's written permission, the Seller may sell the Seller Receipt and Servicing Retention Amount in whole, but not in part, to a single entity at one time. The Seller may not sell less than 100% of the Seller Receipt and Servicing Retention Amount, and may not sell a participation interest in any portion of any of its Pooled loans. In addition, in order to complete such sale, Seller must have the purchaser of its rights to the Pool Loan execute an allonge to the Seller's First Lien Position 504 Loan Pool Guarantee Agreement in a form acceptable to SBA, acknowledging and accepting all terms of the Seller's First Lien Position 504 Loan Pool Guarantee Agreement, and deliver the executed original allonge and a copy of the corresponding First Lien Position 504 Loan Pool Guarantee Agreement to the CSA. All Pool Loan payments related to a Seller Receipt and Servicing Retention Amount proposed for sale will be withheld by the CSA pending SBA acknowledgement of receipt of all executed documents required to complete the transfer.

[74 FR 56093, Oct. 30, 2009, as amended at 82 FR 39506, Aug. 21, 2017]
#### § 127.404 May SBA require additional information from a WOSB or EDWOSB during a program examination?

At the discretion of the D/GC, SBA has the right to require that a WOSB or EDWOSB submit additional information at any time during the program examination. SBA may draw an adverse inference from the failure of a concern to cooperate with a program examination or provide requested information.

[85 FR 27664, May 11, 2020]
§ 308.3 Planning performance awards. ( a ) A Recipient of Investment Assistance awarded on or after the date of enactment of section 216 of PWEDA for a Project located in an EDA-funded Economic Development District may, at the discretion of the Assistant Secretary, receive a planning performance award in an amount not to exceed five percent of the amount of the applicable Investment award if EDA determines before closeout of the Project that: ( 1 ) The Recipient, through the Project, actively participated in the economic development activities of the District;
( 2 ) The Project demonstrated exceptional fulfillment of one or more components of, and is otherwise in accordance with, the applicable CEDS, including any job creation or job retention requirements; and
( 3 ) The Recipient demonstrated exceptional collaboration with Federal, State, and local economic development entities throughout the development of the Project.
( b ) The Recipient shall use the planning performance award to increase, up to 100 percent, the Federal share of the cost of a Project under this chapter.
( c ) The applicable FFO may set forth additional requirements, qualifications and guidelines for planning performance awards.
[71 FR 56675, Sept. 27, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 62869, Oct. 22, 2008; 79 FR 76136, Dec. 19, 2014]
HomeAbout NRCEmergency Preparedness & ResponseAbout Emergency  Preparedness

# Protective Action Recommendations

If an incident at a nuclear power plant could result in a radiation dose exceeding the Environmental Protection Agency's protective action guides, responsible plant personnel evaluate the situation and then make protective action recommendations (PARs) for public safety to State and local government agencies. Plant personnel must report the PARs to State or local officials within 15 minutes of a General Emergency declaration. The responsible State or local officials make the final decision on what protective actions to take in order to protect public health and safety, and then relay those decisions to the public in a timely manner.

The NRC monitors a plant's PAR process to ensure appropriate actions are taken or recommended by plant personnel. Additionally, State and local agencies may independently assess the situation to ensure that the correct protective action decisions are made. Independent assessments performed during an accidental radiological release from a nuclear power plant ensure that the best possible action is taken.

**In the unlikely event of a nuclear power plant accident, it is important that you follow directions from State or local officials to make sure protective actions are implemented safely and effectively for the affected population.**

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 13, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Emergency Classification
          - Emergency Action Level Development
          - Emergency Planning Zones
          - Protective Action Recommendations
          - Federal, State, Tribal, and Local Responsibilities
          - Emergency Exercise Schedule
          - Response to Terrorism
          - Research and Test Reactor Emergency Preparedness
          - Use of Potassium Iodide

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 13, 2020
(June 25, 1943.)

#### James J. Daly et al., Appellants, v. National Civil Service Endowment Association, Incorporated, Respondent.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.