alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
39–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–212 

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 3, SAFE, ACCOUNTABLE, FLEXIBLE, EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT: A LEGACY FOR USERS 

JULY 29 (legislative day of JULY 28), 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and 

ordered to be printed 

Mrs. CAPITO, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 399] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 399, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 3, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, and against 

its consideration. The resolution provides that the conference report shall be considered as read. The resolution also provides that 

the Clerk shall not transmit to the Senate a message that it has 

adopted the conference report to accompany H.R. 3 until the House 

has received a message that the Senate has agreed to House Concurrent Resolution 226 as adopted by the House or passed H.R. 

3514 without amendment. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order is necessary because the conference report was filed with the House on Thursday, July 28, 2005 

and it may be considered by the House as early as Friday, July 29, 

2005, which would violate clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring a threeday layover of conference reports and the accompanying joint explanatory statement). 

Æ
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Swamp Canyon Loop

Bryce Canyon National Park
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 114

**Question 114:** A licensee is required to provide individual monitoring for each occupationally exposed individual who is likely to receive, in a year, a dose in excess of 10% of the applicable limits in 10 CFR 20.1201, 10 CFR 20.1207, or 10 CFR 20.1208. Must a licensee account for the exposure that an individual may receive at another licensee's facility, if that worker transfers to another licensed facility during the monitoring year, when determining if it is likely that the individual may exceed 10% of the limits? 

In addition, if a new employee already has an exposure in excess of 10% of the limits when they start work at the new employer, must the new employer automatically monitor the employee?

**Answer:** No. The licensee is only responsible for evaluating the potential for exposure at its facility. If the licensee makes an evaluation that the dose will not exceed the 10% threshold, the licensee need not record or monitor the dose. If the licensee opts to measure the dose, although its preliminary evaluation shows that it is not necessary and finds that the threshold has been exceeded, it must reevaluate its program and provide monitoring as required. In addition the licensee will need to reconsider the requirements to sum internal and external doses. 

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1502)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Louis B. Samuels, Appellant, against Milton O. Bailey, as Sheriff of Greene County, Defendant-Respondent. Augusta Samuels, Respondent.

Foster, P. J., Heffeman, Brewster, Santry and Bergan, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 1:20-cv-22603-GOODMAN

ERIK CHAVEZ, individually, and

on behalf of others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

GRILL ENTERPRISES, LLC, a 

Florida Limited Liability Company, d/b/a 

Los Parrilleros and Parrilleros Tavern, and 

RUBEN SIERRA, individually,

 Defendants.

_____________________________________/

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ALLOW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

IN THE COURTROOM FOR USE DURING EACH DAY OF TRIAL

Defendants, Grill Enterprises, LLC and Ruben Sierra, in accordance with the Court’s PostPretrial Conference Administrative Order [ECF No. 147], hereby file this Motion for Leave to 

Allow Electronic Equipment in the Courtroom for Use During Each Day of Trial, which is 

scheduled to begin on Monday, May 8, 2023, at 9:30 a.m., before the Honorable Johnathan 

Goodman, at the James Lawrence King Justice Building, 99 NE 4th Street, 11th Floor, Miami, 

Florida. 

Defendants request permission to utilize the following electronic devices for and during the 

trial of this cause: 

Case 1:20-cv-22603-JG Document 162 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Owner Electronic Equipment

Brian H. Pollock, Esq. Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Laptop w/ charging cord

Todd W. Shulby, Esq. Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Laptop w/ charging cord

Ruben Sierra Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Vanessa Carillo Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Yeison Gonzalez Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Denysse Carillo Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Melody Blanco

(Legal assistant to Brian H. 

Pollock)

Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Lynn Langford

(Legal assistant to Todd W. 

Shulby)

Cellular Phone w/charging cord

WHEREFORE, Defendants, Grill Enterprises, LLC and Ruben Sierra, request the Court 

to enter an Order granting relief requested herein. 

Respectfully submitted this 3rd day of May 2023,

/s/Todd W. Shulby, Esq.

Todd W. Shulby, Esq.

Todd W. Shulby, P.A. 

1792 Bell Tower Lane

Weston, FL 33326

Telephone: (954) 530-2236

Facsimile: (954) 530-6628

E-mail: tshulby@shulbylaw.com

Florida Bar No.: 068365

Co-Counsel for Defendants

/s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq. 

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

FairLaw Firm

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Telephone: (305) 230-4884

Facsimile: (305) 230-4844

E-mail: brian@fairlawattorney.com

Florida Bar No.: 174742

Co-Counsel for Defendants

Case 1:20-cv-22603-JG Document 162 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2023 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial infomration extracted from
     Micro-Economics, Inc. September 30, 1998 financial statements and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894552
<NAME>                        MICRO-ECONOMICS, INC.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998

<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    666
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                              (1,666)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .00



</TABLE>
#### § 114.109 What if my claim is denied?

SBA will notify you or your agent or legal representative in writing by certified or registered mail if it denies your claim. You have a right to file suit in an appropriate U.S. District Court not later than six months after the date the notification was mailed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-21243-KMW

MARIO TAVAROUS YOUNG,

Petitioner,

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Respondent.

_________________________________________/ 

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid’s report 

and recommendation (DE 8) (“Report”) regarding Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas 

corpus. Petitioner did not file objections to the Report and the time to do so has now 

passed. Upon an independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable case law, 

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. The conclusions in the Report (DE 8) are AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. This action is DISMISSED.

3. No certificate of appealability shall issue. 

4. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

5. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 28th day of April, 2021.

Case 1:20-cv-21243-KMW Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/28/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

cc:

Mario Tavarous Young

04972-104

United States Penitentiary

Inmate Mail / Parcels 

Post Office Box 150160

Atlanta, GA 30315

Case 1:20-cv-21243-KMW Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/28/2021 Page 2 of 2
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 417

**Question 417:** This question refers to the answer to Question 29 under §20.1302. The statement that a licensee can require members of the public to exit a controlled area at any time is not obvious, based on the published rule. A controlled area is one to which access can be limited, but that condition might exist only at certain times or under certain conditions or the access limits might be of a nature other than strict prohibition. For instance, it might be a control that specifically limits the stay time. Does NRC expect procedures to reflect the changing nature of such an area, i.e., controlled at one time but unrestricted at other times, or is an area that meets the requirements to be designated a controlled area for some portion of time simply a controlled area all the time? (The latter, I hope).

**Answer:** The words ". . . access to which can be limited . . ." in the definition of "controlled area" mean that access can be limited at any and all times, regardless of whether or not access is limited at any particular time. An area designated by a licensee as a controlled area continues to be a controlled area until that designation is changed; it does not change from being a controlled area, and become an unrestricted area, simply because access is not being limited at some particular time. [See discussions of "Licensee Discretion" and "Controlled Areas" in the answer to Question 26 (a).]

(References: 10 CFR 20.1003, 10 CFR 20.1302)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

39–011 2005

109th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 109–42 

EXTENSION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY FOR THE 

REPUBLIC OF BELARUS 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE SECRETARY, THE DEPARTMENT OF 

STATE 

TRANSMITTING

NOTIFICATION OF THE DETERMINATION THAT A WAIVER OF THE 

APPLICATION OF SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 402 0F 

THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 WITH RESPECT TO THE REPUBLIC OF 

BELARUS WILL SUBSTANTIALLY PROMOTE THE OBJECTIVES OF 

SECTION 402, PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. 2432(c) AND (d) 

JULY 11, 2005.—Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means and 

ordered to be printed 


E:\Seals\Congress.#13
(1) 

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Washington, DC., June 7, 2005. 

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT, 

Speaker of the House. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: On behalf of the Secretary, we are transmitting to you the Presidential determination and Report to the Congress, referred to in subsection 402(d)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974 

(the ‘‘Act’’), as amended, with respect to the continuation of a waiver of application of subsections (a) and (b) of section 402 of the Act 

to Belarus. 

This document constitutes the Secretary’s recommendation to 

continue this waiver for a further twelve-month period and includes her determination that continuation of the waiver currently 

in effect for Belarus will substantially promote the objectives of section 402 of the Act, and the reasons for such determination. 

We hope that this information will be helpful to you and other 

Members of Congress. Please do not hesitate to contact us if we can 

be of further assistance. 

Sincerely, 

MATTHEW A. REYNOLDS, 

Acting Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs. 

Enclosure: As stated. 

(1) 


Insert graphic folio 3 here HD42.001
2 


Insert graphic folio 4 here HD42.002
3 


Insert graphic folio 5 here HD42.003
----

----

I Comunicaciones

Comisión

----

CATÁLOGO COMÚN DE VARIEDADES DE ESPECIES DE PLANTAS AGRÍCOLAS

Sexto suplemento a la vigesimotercera edición integral

(2005/C 334 A/01)

SUMARIO

Notas explicativas

Lista de especies de plantas agrícolas

----

NOTAS EXPLICATIVAS

----

(1)DO C 46 A de 22.2.2005, p. 1. Catálogo modificado en último lugar por el quinto suplemento (DO C 196 A de 11.8.2005, p. 1).

(2)DO L 193 de 20.7.2002, p. 1. Directiva modificado en último lugar por el Reglamento (CE) no 1829/2003 del Parlamento Europeo y el Consejo (DO L 268 de 18.10.2003, p. 1).

----

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

2.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

3.AGROSTIS CANINA L.

4.AGROSTIS GIGANTEA ROTH.

5.AGROSTIS STOLONIFERA L.

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

13.FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA SCHREBER

14.FESTUCA OVINA L.

15.FESTUCA PRATENSIS HUDSON

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

19.LOLIUM × BOUCHEANUM KUNTH

22.PHLEUM PRATENSE L.

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

35.MEDICAGO SATIVA L.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

43.TRIFOLIUM REPENS L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

48.VICIA SATIVA L.

51.BRASSICA OLERACEA L. CONVAR. ACEPHALA (DC.) ALEF. VAR. MEDULLOSA THELL. + VAR. VIRIDIS L.

III

56.BRASSICA JUNCEA (L.) CZERNJ ET COSSON

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

59.CANNABIS SATIVA L.

62.GOSSYPIUM SPP.

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

64.LINUM USITATISSIMUM L.

66.SINAPIS ALBA L.

67.GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

70.ORYZA SATIVA L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

79.TRITICUM SPELTA L.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----
119 STAT. 366 PUBLIC LAW 109–23—JULY 12, 2005

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 289:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Feb. 1, considered and passed House.

June 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–23

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 8200 South

Vermont Avenue in Los Angeles, California, as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class John

Marshall Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

8200 South Vermont Avenue in Los Angeles, California, shall be

known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class John Marshall

Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant

First Class John Marshall Post Office Building’’.

Approved July 12, 2005.

July 12, 2005

[H.R. 289]
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

*CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

In connection with the Annual Report of MedicalCV,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended April 30, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, John H. Jungbauer, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.                                       the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

 
| Dated:  July  21, 2005 | By:    | /s/ John H. Jungbauer       |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                        |   | John H. Jungbauer           |
|                        |   | Vice President, Finance and |
|                        |   | Chief Financial Officer     |

 

----
§ 46.310 Contents of an environmental assessment. ( a ) At a minimum, an environmental assessment must include brief discussions of: ( 1 ) The proposal;
( 2 ) The need for the proposal;
( 3 ) The environmental impacts of the proposed action;
( 4 ) The environmental impacts of the alternatives considered; and
( 5 ) A list of agencies and persons consulted.
( b ) When the Responsible Official determines that there are no unresolved conflicts about the proposed action with respect to alternative uses of available resources, the environmental assessment need only consider the proposed action and does not need to consider additional alternatives, including the no action alternative. (See section 102(2)(E) of NEPA).
( c ) In addition, an environmental assessment may describe a broader range of alternatives to facilitate planning and decision-making.
( d ) A proposed action or alternative(s) may include adaptive management strategies allowing for adjustment of the action during implementation. If the adjustments to an action are clearly articulated and pre-specified in the description of the alternative and fully analyzed, then the action may be adjusted during implementation without the need for further analysis. Adaptive management includes a monitoring component, approved adaptive actions that may be taken, and environmental effects analysis for the adaptive actions approved.
( e ) The level of detail and depth of impact analysis should normally be limited to the minimum needed to determine whether there would be significant environmental effects.
( f ) Bureaus may choose to provide additional detail and depth of analysis as appropriate in those environmental assessments prepared under paragraph 46.300(b).
( g ) An environmental assessment must contain objective analyses that support conclusions concerning environmental impacts.
Fire! Few words can

strike such terror. Residential

fires are, unfortunately, a

common occurrence. Some 2

million American homes are

in flames yearly. In the

aftermath of fire, people are

left to salvage their lives and

belongings.

 Whether it’s the whole

house involved or just a fire in

the kitchen, people try to

save what they can --

including food. But generally,

saving food that’s been in a

fire is not a good idea.

 Food exposed to fire can

be compromised by three

factors: the heat of the fire,

smoke fumes and

chemicals used to fight fire.

CONSUMER INFORMATION FROM USDA

Food Safety and Inspection Service, Food Safety & Consumer

Education Office

 (202) 690-0351; Fax (202) 720-9063

October 1996

After a Fire, Is the Food Safe?

Heat from the Fire

Food in cans or jars may appear

to be okay, but if they’ve been

close to the HEAT of a fire, they

may no longer be edible.

 Why? Heat from a fire can

activate food spoilage bacteria. If

the heat is extreme, the cans or

jars themselves can split or

rupture, rendering the food

unsafe.

Fumes from a Fire

One of the most dangerous

elements of a fire is sometimes not

the fire itself, but TOXIC FUMES

released from burning materials.

 Those fumes can kill; they can

also contaminate food. Any type of

food stored in permeable

packaging -- cardboard, plastic

wrap, etc. -- should be thrown

away. Toxic fumes can permeate

the packaging and contaminate the

food. ! Make your home fire-safe by

 Discard any raw foods stored installing battery-powered smoke

outside the refrigerator, such as

potatoes or fruit, that could be

contaminated by fumes.

 Surprisingly, food stored in

refrigerators or freezers can

also become contaminated by

fumes. The refrigerator seal

isn’t airtight and fumes can get

inside.

 If food from your refrigerator

has an off-flavor or odor when

it’s prepared, throw it away.

Call Toll-free For

 More Information

USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline

1 (800) 535-4555

Washington DC (202) 720-3333

Also call American Red Cross, Civil

Defense or emergency offices. 

Chemicals in Fires 

Chemicals used to fight fires

contain toxic materials and can

contaminate food and cookware.

The chemicals cannot be washed

off the food. 

 Foods that are exposed to

chemicals should be thrown away.

This includes food stored at room

temperature, such as fruits and

vegetables, as well as foods stored

in permeable containers like

cardboard and screw-topped jars

and bottles.

 Canned goods and cookware

exposed to chemicals can be

decontaminated. 

 Wash in a strong detergent

solution. Then dip in a bleach

solution (1 teaspoon bleach per

quart of water) for 15 minutes.

Fire Stoppers 

The American Red Cross

recommends that you:

detectors on each floor and in the

garage. Test the detectors twice a

year and keep a working fire

extinguisher in the kitchen.

! Plan two emergency escape

routes from each room in the house.

Have rope or chain ladders for

upstairs rooms. Agree on where to

meet after the family “escapes.”

! Have your own practice fire drills.

Instruct everyone to crawl low under

“smoke.”
§ 106.401 What are the minimum requirements applicable to a Non-Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activities? While SBA may subject Non-Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activities to additional requirements through internal policy and procedure, the following requirements apply to all Non-Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activity: ( a ) A Non-Fee Based Record must be prepared and approved by the Responsible Program Official in advance of the activity;
( b ) Gifts of cash accepted for Non-Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activities are subject to § 106.500, internal SBA policies and procedures as well as applicable U.S. Treasury rules and guidelines; and
( c ) Written approval must be obtained as outlined in § 106.403.