alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
119 STAT. 368 PUBLIC LAW 109–25—JULY 12, 2005

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 504:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Apr. 20, considered and passed House.

June 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–25

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4960 West

Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the ‘‘Ray Charles Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

4960 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, shall

be known and designated as the ‘‘Ray Charles Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ray Charles

Post Office Building’’.

Approved July 12, 2005.

July 12, 2005

[H.R. 504]
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Become a Junior Paleontologist

Calling fossil-lovers of all ages! If you love paleontology and the National Park Service units that preserve them, become a Junior Paleontologist! Complete an activity booklet, learning all about fossils and having some fun along the way, to earn your Junior Paleontologist badge.Ask a ranger at any fossil park you’re visiting for your Junior Paleontologist booklet. If you’d like to get a head start before you arrive or you are completing your booklet at home, you can download and print the booklet. Once your booklet is finished, check back in with a ranger at your park or mail your booklet back to the park to earn your Junior Paleontologist badge! Have fun out there!

Pets AllowedYes

Activity FeeNo

## ** Tags

            -  midwest 
            -  fossils 
            -  paleontology 
            -  junior ranger 

NPS Photo

## ** Tags

        -  midwest 
        -  fossils 
        -  paleontology 
        -  junior ranger 

Last updated: August 17, 2023

----

National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the Interior

          -  Accessibility 
          -  Privacy Policy 
          -  FOIA 
          -  Notices 
          -  Contact The National Park Service 
          -  NPS FAQ 
          -  No Fear Act 
          -  Disclaimer 
          -  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 
          -  USA.gov 
          -  Facebook 
          -  Youtube 
          -  Twitter 
          -  Instagram 
          -  Flickr
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with
the Annual Report of Interlink-US-Network, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for
the twelve months ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard M. Greenberg, President.
 certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and
the results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 31,
2009



/s/
Richard M. Greenberg

---------------------

Richard
M. Greenberg

President,
Secretary and Treasurer

(Chief financial officer)





A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 459]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ459.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 3873]]

Public Law 108-459
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 747 Broadway in Albany, New York, as the ``United States Postal 
  Service Henry Johnson Annex''. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 2004 -  [H.R. 480]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 747 
Broadway in Albany, New York, and known as the United States Postal 
Service Carrier Annex, shall be known and designated as the ``United 
States Postal Service Henry Johnson Annex''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``United States Postal Service 
Henry Johnson Annex''.

    Approved December 21, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 480:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Sept. 22, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 7, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### Robert L. James, Appellant, v. Edward Buhrmaster et al., Respondents. Harold F. Buhrmaster, Plaintiff, v. Robert L. James, Defendant. Edward C. Buhrmaster, Plaintiff, v. Robert L. James, Defendant.

Order reversed, on the law and facts, with $10 costs and disbursements. Hill, P. J., Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Deyo, J., dissents, in part, in the following memorandum, in which Brewster, J., concurs: The motion made by the defendants in action number one was for an order directing that the three actions be tried together without consolidation in either Saratoga County, the county of venue in action number one, or in Schenectady County, the county of venue in actions numbered two and three.- The plaintiff-appellant in action number one united in the *837motion for a joint trial and asked that it he had in Saratoga County. Although, apparently, the attorneys for the plaintiffs and the defendant in actions numbered two and three appeared on the motion, they filed no papers and did not appear on the appeal. The court at Special Term held that there should be a joint trial and directed that it be held in Schenectady County. Section 96 of the Civil Practice Act provides that actions may be consolidated and section 96-a provides that they may be tried together without consolidation whenever it can be done without prejudice to a substantial right. Neither section specifically provides that such relief may be had when the actions are pending in different counties. However, it has been consistently held that this right exists in the case of consolidation pursuant to the former-statute and that under such circumstances the order should provide for the place of trial. *(Funk*v. *Nelson,*264 App. Div. 876.) It follows by analogy that the court, under its broad discretionary powers to determine the method of trial of litigated matters, may likewise direct joint trials without consolidation of cases pending in different counties and must by necessity fix the place of trial. In the instant case the court properly directed the joint trial. However, he should have directed that the trial be held in Saratoga County since the record fails to disclose any exceptional circumstances warranting the removal of the action from the county whose jurisdiction was first invoked. *(Quality Fruit Wines*Corp. v. *Singer,*267 App. Div. 834.) This would have been in direct accordance with the express desires of both the plaintiff and the defendants in action number one who were the only parties who filed any papers on the motion or who took part in the appeal. The order should be modified by directing that the actions be tried together without consolidation in Saratoga County, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Science of the American Southwest





Contact Us
  Welcome This site is dedicated to understanding and preserving the unique resources of the American Southwest through science and education. It delivers information about the natural and cultural resources of the region and about scientific activities underway. The primary focus is to present the results of research and monitoring to land managers, students, researchers, policy makers, and the interested public, and to promote mission-oriented research within the region.
  Stellar jay at Bandelier National MonumentBirds Birds are an important and lively component of many ecosystems in the American Southwest.
 False color satellite image of wildfires burning in Arizona in 2002Climate Change Climate models predict that over the next 100 years, the Southwest will become warmer and even more arid.
 Eastern collared lizardReptiles & Amphibians Many uniquely adapted reptiles and amphibians inhabit the aquatic and terrestrial habitats of the American Southwest.
 Vegetation and landcover map for El Morro National Historic MonumentVegetation Mapping Vegetation mapping efforts produce detailed maps of park vegetation types.
 Series of T-doors in Pueblo Bonito, Chaco Culture NHPPrehistoric Cultures The American Southwest has been home to a diversity of cultures for as long as 13,000 years.
 Integrated upland vegetation and soils monitoring plot at Bandelier NMMonitoring Monitoring projects are designed to collect information about resources over time.
 Arizona pocket mouse found during a mammal inventoryInventories Inventories help document the presence/absence, location, or condition of resources in parks.
 Cycladenia jonesii is listed as Threatened under the Endangered Species ActRare Plants Several plants in the American Southwest are rare, with very limited ranges or existing in low numbers.
 Pinyon-juniper woodlands at Navajo National MonumentPinyon-Juniper Woodlands Pinyon-juniper woodland is the most common forest type in the American Southwest
 Last updated: February 13, 2018
 Take a  Peek at the Past!
Natural & Human History
 Make Your Own Checklist!
Species Lists
 The Science Never Stops!
Research Projects
 Look, Watch or Listen!
Photos & Multimedia
 Tools Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
Editorial Note on Part 124
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 124 appear at 72 FR 50040, Aug. 30, 2007, and 76 FR 8253, Feb. 11, 2011.

§ 124.302 What is graduation and what is early graduation? ( a ) *General.* SBA may graduate a firm from the 8(a) BD program at the expiration of its program term (graduation) or prior to the expiration of its program term (early graduation) where SBA determines that: ( 1 ) The concern has successfully completed the 8(a) BD program by substantially achieving the targets, objectives, and goals set forth in its business plan, and has demonstrated the ability to compete in the marketplace without assistance under the 8(a) BD program; or
( 2 ) One or more of the disadvantaged owners upon whom the Participant's eligibility is based are no longer economically disadvantaged.
( b ) *Exceeding the size standard corresponding to the primary NAICS code.* SBA may graduate a Participant prior to the expiration of its program term where the firm exceeds the size standard corresponding to its primary NAICS code, as adjusted during the program, for three successive program years unless the firm is able to demonstrate that it has taken steps to change its industry focus to another NAICS code that is contained in the goals, targets and objectives of its business plan.
( c ) *Excessive withdrawals.* SBA may graduate a Participant prior to the expiration of its program term where excessive funds or other assets have been withdrawn from the Participant (see § 124.112(d)(3)), causing SBA to determine that the Participant has demonstrated the ability to compete in the marketplace without assistance under the 8(a) BD program.
[63 FR 35739, 35772, June 30, 1998, as amended at 76 FR 8258, Feb. 11, 2011; 88 FR 26205, Apr. 27, 2023]
### [§§211 to 216. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §106, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 28]

Section 211, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 899; Aug. 25, 1958, Pub. L. 85–755, §1, 72 Stat. 848, provided for creation of United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals under article III of the United States Constitution and for appointment of a chief judge and four associate judges for that court.

Section 212, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 899, provided for order of precedence of chief judge and associate judges of court.

Section 213, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 899; Mar. 2, 1955, ch. 9, §1(e), 69 Stat. 10; Aug. 14, 1964, Pub. L. 88–426, title IV, §403(e), 78 Stat. 434; Aug. 9, 1975, Pub. L. 94–82, title II, §205(b)(5), 89 Stat. 422, provided for tenure and salaries of judges.

Section 214, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 899, authorized court to hold court at such times and places as it might fix by rule.

Section 215, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 899, provided that three judges of court constituted a quorum and that concurrence of three judges was necessary to any decision.

Section 216, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 899, provided for filing of written opinions by Court of Customs and Patent Appeals on appeals from decisions of Patent Office and recording of those opinions in Patent Office.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as an Effective Date of 1982 Amendment note under section 171 of this title.

#### Transfer of Matters and Petitions Pending in United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals on October 1, 1982

For provisions that any matter pending before the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals on Oct. 1, 1982, and that any petition for rehearing, reconsideration, alteration, modification, or other change in any decision of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals rendered prior to Oct. 1, 1982, that has not been determined on that date or that is filed after that date, be determined by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, see section 403(b), (c) of Pub. L. 97–164, formerly set out as a note under section 171 of this title.
§ 5.4 When is a permit required for news-gathering activities? ( a ) *Permit requirements.* News-gathering activities involving filming, videography, or still photography do not require a permit unless: ( 1 ) We determine a permit is necessary to protect natural and cultural resources, to avoid visitor use conflicts, to ensure public safety or authorize entrance into a closed area; and
( 2 ) Obtaining a permit will not interfere with the ability to gather the news.
( b ) *Terms and conditions.* All permits issued under this section will include only terms and conditions necessary to maintain order, ensure the safety of the public and the media, and protect natural and cultural resources.
( c ) *Exemptions.* A permit issued for news-gathering activities is not subject to location fees or cost recovery charges.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ARAMARK Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Neubauer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    JOSEPH NEUBAUERJoseph Neubauer
#### In the Matter of New York State Labor Relations Board against Toffenetti Restaurant Company, Inc.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Second Department,

September, 1943.

(September 16, 1943.)

#### In the Matter of Elizabeth B. Fitzpatrick, Appellant, against Walter W. Westall et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the County of Westchester, et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
### §2202. Further relief

Further necessary or proper relief based on a declaratory judgment or decree may be granted, after reasonable notice and hearing, against any adverse party whose rights have been determined by such judgment.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 964.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §400 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §274d, as added June 14, 1934, ch. 512, 48 Stat. 955; Aug. 30, 1935, ch. 829, §405, 49 Stat. 1027).

This section is based on the second paragraph of section 400 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provisions of such section are incorporated in section 2201 of this title.

Provision in said section 400 that the court shall require adverse parties whose rights are adjudicated to show cause why further relief should not be granted forthwith, were omitted as unnecessary and covered by the revised section.

Provisions relating to submission of interrogatories to a jury were omitted as covered by rule 49 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Changes were made in phraseology.
Open File Report 99-393

The exact equivalent of the U.S.G.S. Open-File Report for this quadrangle can be viewed and printed 

clicking on the following highlighted text:

Kenai pdf file (150 k)

(Note that the ARDF is in Adobe Acrobat format; if your computer does not hav

this software, it can be installed with the Acrobat icon at the bottom of this page

Digital Versions of the Data

The data was originally compiled with FileMaker Pro software; if you have Version 7.0 or later of FileM

your computer, the data can be searched and manipulated through your browser by clicking on 

Kenai FileMaker Pro (.fp7) file (244 k)

(If you are going to use this file repeatedly, it may be more convenient to downlo

it permanently to your computer rather than wait for it to download through yo

browser every time you wish to use it.)

ARDF - Kenai h1 of 2 
The data can also be downloaded in a "csv" format that can be used with a variety of data base and sprea

have the appropriate software that can work with csv files installed on your computer, the data can be m

directly through your browser. (However, see the comment in italics above for the advantages of down

your computer if it is to be used repeatedly).

Kenai comma-separated-value (.csv) file (24 k)

ARDF Home | Quad Map | Quad Table | 

<URL:http://ardf.wr.usgs.gov/quads/html/Kenai.html >

Page maintainer: ARDF@usgs.gov

ARDF - Kenai h2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Paul A. Miller, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of LSB Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation and; c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting and; 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrants auditors and the Audit
Committee of registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting. Date: March 18, 2005 /s/ Paul A. MillerPaul A. MillerPresident and
Chief Executive Officer
| Exhibit 23.1 |
|--------------|

****

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-87236, 333-105187, 333-143249, 333-159448, 333-159449 and 333-159450 and Form S-3 No. 333-109108) of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2009 (exceptfor changes as described in Note 1, as to which the date is October 16, 2009), with respect to the consolidated financial statements of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2009. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP                          

Houston, Texas

February 26, 2010
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

May 31, 2023

No. 04

- 22

- 00703

- CV

Terrick L. ALSBROOKS

, Appellant

v.

CHERISH REALTY SOLUTIONS LLC , Tina Lashaun Skinner, and Fidelity Marketing LLC, Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 3

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022CV02415 Honorable David J. Rodriguez , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. It is ORDERED that costs be assessed against appella nt

.

It is so ORDERED on May 31, 2023

.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez

, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 31st day of May, 2023

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court