alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS





Exhibit
      31.1
            Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, David
Bakhshi, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Latin American
Telecommunications Venture Company-LATVCO





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.           I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, is made known to me by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and





c)
presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;





5.           I
have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors
and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):





a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;
and





6.           I
have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.





Dated:
July 17, 2009





By: /s/
David Bakhshi


David
Bakhshi


Chief
Executive Officer
**Exhibit****31.2**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
 Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I,
Richard K Brock, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PLM Equipment Growth &
Income Fund VII (the Registrant).
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
 
 4.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 
 a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  disclosed
in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 5.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.
 
 
 
 
 Date:
August 10, 2005  By:  /s/
Richard K Brock
 Richard K
Brock
 Chief
Financial Officer
 (Principal
Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000895234
<NAME>                                         0
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     0

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,297
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,985
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (965)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         73,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (36,725)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 73,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        23,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     48,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   73,870
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,538
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,628
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               716
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             836
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                7,896
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            7,896
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7,896
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.43



</TABLE>
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Burial of Patients With Permanent Implants

## HPPOS-030 PDR-9111210152

See the memorandum from L. B. Higginbotham to A. B. Davis dated April 3, 1980. It references NCRP Report No. 37, "Precautions in the Management of Patients Who Have Received Therapeutic Amounts of Radionuclides," regarding burial of patients with permanent implants.

This NCRP report gives levels of radioactivity below which no precautions are needed. A hospital requested guidance on the disposition of a deceased patient with a permanent implant of 20 mCi of I-125 seeds. They were advised by IE:HQ that, since there were no regulatory requirements, the conservative approach would be to remove the implants, if practicable.

It was also suggested that a policy might be needed on this issue to provide guidance. As a general rule, any licensee who requests guidance should be told that he is obligated to adhere to all regulatory requirements, and if no regulatory requirements exist, he may take any action he deems appropriate.

Regional offices may inform licensees where to obtain guidance by suggesting generally accepted documents such as NCRP reports, ICRP committee reports, regulatory guides, and ANSI standards.

If the licensee requests more specificity and doesn't have certain reports and time is essential, regional personnel may summarize applicable guidance sections (if available in the region) for the licensee, making it clear that the licensee is not obligated to use regional suggestions to prevent the licensee from believing that NRC is imposing new requirements on him.

In this particular case, the implants would not have to be removed since permanent implants are not intended to be removed. The guidance in NCRP Report No. 37 that deals with management of patients with therapeutic amounts of radionuclides establishes levels of radioactivity below which no precautions are necessary. 

The deceased patient also contained materials below precautionary concerns, and NCRP reports are generally accepted as appropriate guidance for use in the absence of regulatory requirements.

For patients who die, there are precautions in NCRP Report No. 37 to be taken for physicians performing autopsies and precautions for handling the deceased when no autopsies are performed.

There are also precautions for cremating, including total millicurie amounts per year that can be handled safely by a single crematorium, with some exceptions for Ta-182 and Ir-192 that have been shown to significantly contaminate crematoriums. There appears to be no restrictions or precautions on burial except in preparing the deceased for burial.

The guidance in NCRP Report No. 37 is considered to cover this situation adequately, and it is not believed a policy statement is needed on this issue.

**Regulatory references:** NCRP Report No. 37

**Subject codes:** 9.0, 9.4, 12.8

**Applicability:** Byproduct Material

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 02, 2017
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

_________Southern District of Florida__________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Andres Gomez

TOP VALUE SUPERMARKET 

TOP VALUE SUPERMARKET

1490 NW 3rd Avenue, Miami, FL 33136 

Alberto R. Leal, Esq. 

The Leal Law Firm, P.A. 

8927 Hypoluxo Rd. Lake Worth, FL 33463 

E-Mail: al@thelealfirm.com

Phone: 561-237-2740

1:20-cv-21810-FAM May 1, 2020 s/ C.Davis

Case 1:20-cv-21810-FAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/01/2020 Page 1 of 1
#### Constance Webb, Respondent, v. Bayview Country Club of Rye, Inc., Impleaded etc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
### §3902. Judicial review of regulations

In any proceeding under section 1296 or 1346(g) of this title in which the application of a regulation issued under chapter 5 of title 3 is at issue, the court may review the validity of the regulation in accordance with the provisions of subparagraphs (A) through (D) of section 706(2) of title 5. If the court determines that the regulation is invalid, the court shall apply, to the extent necessary and appropriate, the most relevant substantive executive agency regulation promulgated to implement the statutory provisions with respect to which the invalid regulation was issued. Except as provided in this section, the validity of regulations issued under this chapter is not subject to judicial review.

(Added Pub. L. 104–331, §3(c), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4070.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1997, see section 3(d) of Pub. L. 104–331, set out as a note under section 1296 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Flight Safety Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David D. Cryer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|August 24, 2004 | By: | /s/ David D. Cryer                        
|--------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                |     |                                           
|                |     | David D. Cryer
Its Chief Financial Officer
### §452. Courts always open; powers unrestricted by expiration of sessions

All courts of the United States shall be deemed always open for the purpose of filing proper papers, issuing and returning process, and making motions and orders.

The continued existence or expiration of a session of a court in no way affects the power of the court to do any act or take any proceeding.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 907; Pub. L. 88–139, §2, Oct. 16, 1963, 77 Stat. 248.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§13 and 302 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§9, 189, 36 Stat. 1088, 1143; Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 488, §1, 45 Stat. 1475).

Sections 13 and 302 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., related only to district courts and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, and this section has been written to cover all other courts of the United States.

Other provisions of said section 302 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., are incorporated in sections 214, 456, and 604 of this title.

The phrase "always open" means "never closed" and signifies the time when a court can exercise its functions. With respect to matters enumerated by statute or rule as to which the court is "always open," there is no time when the court is without power to act. (Ex parte Branch, 63 Ala. 383, 387.)

Section 13 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., provided that "The district courts, as courts of admiralty and as courts of equity, shall be deemed always open * * *" for enumerated purposes, and that the judge "at chambers or in the clerk's office, and in vacation as well as in term," may make orders and issue process. The revised section omits all reference to the nature of the action or proceeding and enumeration of the acts which may be performed by the court. This is in accord with Rules 45(c) and 56 of the new Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure which contain similar provisions with respect to criminal procedure both in the courts of appeals and in the district courts.

Rules 6(c) and 77(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure contain provisions similar to the second and first paragraphs, respectively, of this section with respect to civil actions in district courts.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1963—Pub. L. 88–139 substituted "expiration of sessions" for "terms" in section catchline, and "session" for "term" in text.
39–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–217 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO 

SUSPEND THE RULES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 426] 

The Committee of Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 426, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides that suspensions will be in order at any 

time on the legislative day of Thursday, September 8, 2005. The 

rule further provides that the Speaker or his designee will consult 

with the Minority Leader or her designee on any suspension considered under the rule. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of each 

record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with 

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below: 

Rules Committee Record Vote No. 116 

Date: September 7, 2005. 

Measure: H. Res. 426—Providing for Consideration of Motions to 

Suspend the Rules. 

Motion by: Mrs. Slaughter. 

Summary of Motion: To amend the rule to provide two hours of 

general debate under an open rule. 

Results: Defeated 4 to 8. 

Vote by Members: Diaz-Balart—Nay; Hastings (WA)—Nay; Sessions—Nay; Putnam—Nay; Capito—Nay; Cole—Nay; Bishop—Nay; 

2 

Gingrey—Nay; Slaughter—Yea; McGovern—Yea; Hastings (FL)— 

Yea; Matsui—Yea. 

Æ
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Request for Clarification of Guidance Regarding Physicians Determination for Physical Qualification of Respiratory Equipment Users

## HPPOS-103 PDR-9111210235

See the memorandum from D. A. Allison to M. M. Shanbaky dated July 19, 1985.

This memo states that physicians need not sign all forms regarding physical fitness. But, the physician should be involved in the supervision of the fitness program, the review of overall results and individual cases that fall outside certain physical parameters, and the supervision of personnel performing the tests. Simply establishing the program with no further involvement is not adequate.

The health physics position was written in the context of 10 CFR 20.103, but it also applies to "new" 10 CFR 20.1703. HPPOS-061 contains a related topic.

In regards to determining compliance with the 10 CFR 20.103 (c) (2) requirement of who physically signs "fitness" forms, the intent is to have physicians screen individuals for health problems prior to respirator use. An acceptable compliance situation, however, could involve a trained nurse who physically administers medical testing and documents and signs the required forms. This situation is acceptable provided the results of the tests are within a range established and approved by a physician, and the physician agrees to retain full responsibility. If the results of the physical tests fall outside the acceptable range, the individual's case should be referred to the physician for more direct attention and testing. [Note: The above 10 CFR 20.103 (c) (2) requirement is now found in 10 CFR 20.1703 (a) (3).]

Each form does not necessarily need to be signed by a physician; however, the physician should be involved in the supervision of the fitness determination program. Physician supervision of the program is indicated by the review of overall results, the review of individual cases that fall outside established ranges, and the general supervision of personnel actually performing the physical assessments. Simply establishing acceptable ranges for the tests, with no further involvement, is not adequate.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 20.103, 10 CFR 20.1703, Regulatory Guide 8.15, NUREG-0041

**Subject codes:** 8.10

**Applicability:** All

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, July 23, 2020
### §518. Conduct and argument of cases

(a) Except when the Attorney General in a particular case directs otherwise, the Attorney General and the Solicitor General shall conduct and argue suits and appeals in the Supreme Court and suits in the United States Court of Federal Claims or in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and in the Court of International Trade in which the United States is interested.

(b) When the Attorney General considers it in the interests of the United States, he may personally conduct and argue any case in a court of the United States in which the United States is interested, or he may direct the Solicitor General or any officer of the Department of Justice to do so.

(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(c), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 613; amended Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §503, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1743; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §117, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 32; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(b)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 309. | R.S. §359. |

Statutes at Large

The words "and writs of error" are omitted on authority of the Act of Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, §1, 45 Stat. 54. The word "considers" is substituted for "deems".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

1982—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "United States Claims Court or in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit" for "Court of Claims".

1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–417 required the Attorney General and the Solicitor General to conduct and argue suits in the Court of International Trade.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980, and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.