alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT MINUTES

Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres

King Building Courtroom 10-5 Date: 1/22/2021 Time: 10:00 a.m.

Defendant: 1) JONATHAN D. GRENON J#: 73681-018 Case #: 20-MJ-3050-OTAZO-REYES

AUSA: Michael Homer Attorney: Pro se

Violation: Consp. Defraud the US and to Deliver Misbranded Drugs/Criminal Contempt

Proceeding: Arraignment CJA Appt:

Bond/PTD Held:

Yes No Recommended Bond:

Bond Set at: PTD Co-signed by:

Surrender and/or do not obtain passports/travel docs Language: English

Report to PTS as directed/or x’s a week/month by Disposition:

phone: x’s a week/month in person Defendant not called to appear on 

VTC - See page 10 for codeft 

TAKEN OFF CALENDAR 

AUSA Homer to schedule when 

Indictment or Information is filed.

Random urine testing by Pretrial Services

Treatment as deemed necessary

Refrain from excessive use of alcohol

Participate in mental health assessment & treatment

Maintain or seek full-time employment/education

No contact with victims/witnesses

No firearms

Not to encumber property

May not visit transportation establishments

Home Confinement/Electronic Monitoring and/or

Curfew pm to am, paid by

Allowances: Medical needs, court appearances, attorney visits, 

religious, employment

Travel extended to: 

Other: 

NEXT COURT APPEARANCE Date: Time: Judge: Place:

Report RE Counsel:

PTD/Bond Hearing:

Prelim/Arraign or Removal:

Status Conference RE:

D.A.R. EGT-01:1-22-2021-ZOOM-10:48 am Time in Court:

Time from today to ________ excluded 

from Speedy Trial Clock

Page 9

Case 1:20-mj-03050-AOR Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/25/2021 Page 1 of 1
### §2521. Subpoenas and incidental powers

(a) Subpoenas requiring the attendance of parties or witnesses and subpoenas requiring the production of books, papers, documents or tangible things by any party or witness having custody or control thereof, may be issued for purposes of discovery or for use of the things produced as evidence in accordance with the rules and orders of the court. Such subpoenas shall be issued and served and compliance therewith shall be compelled as provided in the rules and orders of the court.

(b) The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority as—

(1) misbehavior of any person in its presence or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice;

(2) misbehavior of any of its officers in their official transactions; or

(3) disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command.

(c) The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have such assistance in the carrying out of its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command as is available to a court of the United States. The United States marshal for any district in which the Court of Federal Claims is sitting shall, when requested by the chief judge of the Court of Federal Claims, attend any session of the Court of Federal Claims in such district.

(Added Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1263, §59(a), 68 Stat. 1248; amended Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §910(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4519.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 inserted "and incidental powers" in section catchline, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), and added subsecs. (b) and (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.
Exhibit 31.3
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
     I, Jeffrey H. Smulyan, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal yearended February 28, 2003 of Emmis Operating Company;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004 /s/ JEFFREY H. SMULYANJeffrey H. SmulyanChairman of the Board, President andChief Executive Officer
7
### §2710. Right of attachment

(a) Where debts are due from a defaulting or delinquent postmaster, contractor, or other officer, agent or employee of the Post Office Department, a warrant of attachment may issue against all property and legal and equitable rights belonging to him, and his sureties, or either of them, where he—

(1) is a nonresident of the district where he was appointed, or has departed from that district for the purpose of permanently residing outside thereof, or of avoiding the service of civil process; and

(2) has conveyed away, or is about to convey away any of his property, or has removed or is about to remove the same from the district wherein it is situated, with intent to defraud the United States.

(b) When the property has been removed, the marshal of the district into which it has been removed, upon receipt of certified copies of the warrant, may seize the property and convey it to a convenient place within the jurisdiction of the court which issued the warrant. Alias warrants may be issued upon due application. The warrant first issued remains valid until the return day thereof.

(Added Pub. L. 86–682, §9, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 706.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was derived from R.S. §924, which was originally classified to section 737 of former Title 28. Following the general revision and enactment of Title 28 by act June 25, 1948, R.S. §924 was reclassified to section 837 of Title 39. R.S. §924 was repealed by section 12(c) of Pub. L. 86–682 (section 1 of which revised and enacted Title 39), and reenacted by section 9 thereof as section 2710 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

References to Post Office Department, Postal Service, Postal Field Service, Field Postal Service, or Departmental Service or Departmental Headquarters of Post Office Department to be considered references to United States Postal Service pursuant to Pub. L. 91–375, §6(o), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 783, set out as a Cross Reference note preceding section 101 of Title 39, Postal Service.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Sept. 1, 1960, see section 11 of Pub. L. 86–682, 74 Stat. 708.
### §514. Legal services on pending claims in departments and agencies

When the head of an executive department or agency is of the opinion that the interests of the United States require the service of counsel on the examination of any witness concerning any claim, or on the legal investigation of any claim, pending in the department or agency, he shall notify the Attorney General, giving all facts necessary to enable him to furnish proper professional service in attending the examination or making the investigation, and the Attorney General shall provide for the service.

(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(c), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 613.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 48. | R.S. §187. |
| | 5 U.S.C. 313. | R.S. §364. |

Statutes at Large

Sections 187 and 364 of the Revised Statutes are combined into one section since they both deal with the same subject matter and are derived from the Act of Feb. 14, 1871, ch. 51, §3, 16 Stat. 412.

The words "executive department" are substituted for "Department" because "Department", as used in R.S. §§187 and 364, meant "executive department". (See R.S. §159.) The word "agency" is substituted for "bureau" as it has a more common current acceptance. The word "concerning" is substituted for "touching". Reference to application for a subpena is omitted as R.S. §364 gives the department head the same authority to request aid from the Attorney General whether or not application has been made for a subpena.

Section 187 of the Revised Statutes was part of title IV of the Revised Statutes. The Act of July 26, 1947, ch. 343, §201(d), as added Aug. 10, 1949, ch. 412, §4, 63 Stat. 579 (former 5 U.S.C. 171–1), which provides "Except to the extent inconsistent with the provisions of this Act [National Security Act of 1947], the provisions of title IV of the Revised Statutes as now or hereafter amended shall be applicable to the Department of Defense" is omitted from this title but is not repealed.

Minor changes are made in phraseology to allow for the combining of the two sections.
#### § 151.02 Scope.

Fire services, in any State, may file claims for reimbursement under section 11 and this part for the direct expenses and losses which are additional firefighting costs over and above normal operating costs incurred while fighting a fire on property which is under the jurisdiction of the United States. Section 11 requires that certain payments be deducted from those costs and that the Treasury Department will ordinarily pay the amount resulting from the application of that formula. Where the United States has entered into a contract (which is not a mutual aid agreement, defined in § 151.03) for the provision of fire protection, and it is the intent of the parties that reimbursement under section 11 is unavailable, this intent will normally govern. Where a mutual aid agreement is in effect between the claimant and an agency of the United States for the property upon which the fire occurred, reimbursement will be available in otherwise proper situations. However, any payments (including the value of services) rendered under the agreement during the term of the agreement (or the Federal fiscal year in which the fire occurred, if no term is discernible) shall be deducted from the costs claimed, pursuant to § 151.12.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA simple test for thermomechanical evaluation of ceramic fibersA simple bend stress relaxation (BSR) test was developed to measure the creep related properties of ceramic fibers and whiskers. The test was applied to a variety of commercial and developmental Si based fibers to demonstrate capabilities and to evaluate the relative creep resistance of the fibers at 1200 to 1400 C. The implications of these results and the advantages of the BSR test over typical tensile creep tests are discussed.Document ID19910011996Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMorscher, Gregory N.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH., United States)*Dicarlo, James A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1991Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-103767E-6029NAS 1.15:103767Accession Number91N21309Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 510-01-50Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910011996.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Council Regulation on the common organisation of the market in hops’

(COM (2005) 386 final — 2005/0162 (CNS))

(2006/C 28/16)

On 21 September 2005 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 36 and the second and third paragraphs of Article 37, of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposal.

On 27 September 2005, the Committee Bureau instructed the Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment to prepare the Committee's work on the subject.

In view of the urgency of the work, the European Economic and Social Committee appointed Mr Kienle as rapporteur-general at its 421st plenary session, held on 26 and 27 October 2005 (meeting of 27 October 2005), and adopted the following opinion with 63 votes in favour, and 3 abstentions.

1.   Overview of the EESC's position

2.   Comments

Brussels, 27 October 2005

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

----

(1)OJ C 110, 30.4.2004, pp. 116-124.

OJ C 80, 30.3.2004, p. 46.

OJ C 193, 10.7.2001, pp. 38-39.

----
§ 108.1220 Requirement for NMVC Company to file financial statements at the time of request for a draw. ( a ) If you submit a request for a draw against SBA's Leverage commitment more than 90 days since your submission of an annual Form 468 or a Form 468 (Short Form), you must: ( 1 ) Give SBA a financial statement on Form 468 (Short Form); and
( 2 ) File a statement of no material adverse change in your financial condition since your last filing of Form 468.
( b ) You will not be eligible for a draw if you are not in compliance with this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-QSB
and is qualified in it's entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         809,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 797,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,677,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,623,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  887,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                887,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   887,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINACIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Philip Gay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Grill Concepts, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 25,
2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Grill Concepts, Inc.


                                   By: /s/ Philip Gay
                                   --------------------------------------
                                   Name: Philip Gay
                                   Title: EVP and Chief Financial Officer
                                   November 8, 2005

<PAGE>
### [§§4001 to 4003. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–295, div. A, title II, §221(a)(103)(A), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4052]

Section 4001, added Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11221(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–439; amended Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13161(a), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 449; Pub. L. 104–188, title I, §§1607(a), (b), 1703(c)(1), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1839, 1875; Pub. L. 105–34, title IX, §906(a)–(b)(2), title XVI, §1601(f)(3)(A), (B), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 874, 875, 1090, provided for imposition of tax on luxury passenger vehicles.

Section 4002, added Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11221(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–439; amended Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13161(a), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 450, related to 1st retail sale, uses treated as sales, and determination of price.

Section 4003, added Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11221(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–439; amended Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13161(a), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 451; Pub. L. 105–34, title IX, §906(b)(3), (4), title XIV, §1401(a), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 875, 1045, related to special rules for separate purchase of vehicles, parts and accessories.

Prior sections 4004, 4006, 4007, 4011, and 4012 of this title were omitted in the general revision of this subchapter by Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13161(a), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 449.

Section 4004, added Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11221(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–440; amended Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13162(a), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 453, related to certain rules applicable to former subpart A of part I of this subchapter.

Section 4006, added Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11221(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–441, related to imposition of tax on 1st retail sale of jewelry.

Section 4007, added Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11221(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–442, related to imposition of tax on 1st retail sale of furs.

Section 4011, added Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11221(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–442, provided definitions and special rules for purposes of this subchapter.

Section 4012, added Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11221(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–444, provided that taxes imposed by this subchapter did not apply to any sale or use after Dec. 31, 1999.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 19, 2014, subject to a savings provision, see section 221(b) of Pub. L. 113–295, set out as an Effective Date of 2014 Amendment note under section 1 of this title.
No: III-23-017 June 13, 2023 

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662 

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663 

NRC to Conduct Open House to Discuss 

2022 Performance of Perry Nuclear Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will be available to discuss the 2022 safety performance of the 

Perry nuclear power plant during an in-person open house scheduled for June 22. The plant, operated by 

Energy Harbor, is located in Perry, Ohio, approximately 35 miles northeast of Cleveland. 

The open house will be held from 5:30-6:30 p.m. Eastern time, at the Perry Public Library, 3753 

Main Street in Perry. NRC staff responsible for plant inspection and oversight, including the resident 

inspectors based full-time at the site, will participate in the discussion.

The NRC determined that Perry operated safely during 2022. All inspection findings and 

performance indicators were green, or very low safety significance. As a result, Perry remains under the 

NRC’s baseline level of oversight, which entails thousands of hours of inspection each year. 

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to measure 

plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, commensurate with the 

safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or performance indicators with more than very 

low safety significance trigger increased NRC oversight. 

Plant inspections are performed by two NRC resident inspectors and other specialist inspectors from 

the agency’s Region III office in Lisle, Illinois, and NRC headquarters in Rockville, Maryland. 

The annual assessment letter for Perry is available on the NRC website. Current performance 

information for the plant is also available on NRC’s website and updated quarterly.