alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
D1 (in) D2 (in) D3 (in)

11-200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.000 0.200

13-205 0.205 0.205 0.205 0.000 0.205

14-208 0.208 0.209 0.208 0.001 0.208

15-209 0.209 0.211 0.211 0.002 0.210

20-215 0.215 0.215 0.216 0.001 0.215

22-218 0.218 0.217 0.218 0.001 0.218

where: where:

a D1,2,3

a D1,2,3

b ∆D b ∆D

c

Davg

c

Davg

Date: March 23, 2010

Nozzle Calibration

Calibrated by: Kevin Donahoe

Nozzle ID

= maximum difference between any two diameters, mm (in.), 

∆D ≤ 0.004 in. (0.10 mm).

= average of D1, D2, D3.

Nozzle Diametera

∆Db (in) Davg

c (in)

= three different nozzle diameter measurements, in. (mm); 

measured to the nearest 0.001 in. (0.025 mm.).
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Vicksburg
National Military Park
MS, LA


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Licensed Battlefield Guides
 Interested in becoming a Licensed Battlefield Guide?
Find out more about training seminars being offered in March and April 2024.

Licensed Battlefield Guide PatchOfficial Patch of a Licensed Battlefield Guide NPSLooking for guided tour of the park? Reserve a Licensed Battlefield Guide!

The Licensed Battlefield Guides have been making history come alive at Vicksburg National Military Park since the 1950's. They offer visitors the unique opportunity to explore the battlefield with a professional guide who has excellent knowledge of civilian life and military operations of the campaign, siege, and defense of Vicksburg in the spring and summer of 1863.
Tours are approximately two hours in length and can be arranged for individuals, families, and groups of all sizes.

Hiring a Licensed Battelfield Guide is one of the best, most comprehensive ways to experience Vicksburg NMP. All guides have undergone an extensive credentialing and examination process prior to earning their license and are the local experts on the Civil War at Vicksburg.
Tours can be customized to individual needs and levels of interest. Guides can also provide tours of downtown Vicksburg and comprehensive campaign tours that cover the 18-month Union offensive for Vicksburg. Each year, Licensed Battlefield Guides help reach over 10,000 visitors!

Reservations
Reservations are strongly encouraged, but walk-up tours are usually available.**For Tours: Call 601-636-3827**

Tour Rates
Fees for a tour are based on a minimum two-hour tour and are paid directly to the Licensed Battelfield Guide. This is in addition to park entrance fees.
$60.00/car (1-6 people) ($25.00 for each additional hour)
$80.00/van (7-15 people) ($35.00 for each additional hour)
$110.00/bus (16+ people) ($50.00 for each additional hour)
 Last updated: March 5, 2024
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 3201 Clay Street
Vicksburg,
MS
39183
 Phone: 601 636-0583 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
#### § 123.19 May I request an increase in the amount of an economic injury loan?

SBA will consider your request for an increase in the loan amount if you can show that the increase is essential for your business to continue and is based on events occurring after SBA approved your original loan which were beyond your control. For example, delays may have occurred beyond your control which prevent you from resuming your normal business activity in a reasonable time frame. Your request for an increase in the loan amount must be related to the disaster for which the SBA economic injury disaster loan was originally made.

[63 FR 15072, Mar. 30, 1998]
EXHIBIT 31.01

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and

<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)		All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and

b)		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.





Date:  November 14, 2003      /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman
	                            Jeffrey A. Rothman
                                 President,
                                 Demeter Management Corporation,
                                 general partner of the registrant
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1400

In re: TIMOTHY RAY ELEY,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:13-cv-00399-LMB-TRJ)

Submitted: July 11, 2014 Decided: August 4, 2014

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Ray Eley, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Ray Eley petitions for a writ of mandamus 

seeking an order to compel his former counsel, an assistant 

public defender for the City of Portsmouth, to file an affidavit 

on Eley’s behalf. We conclude that Eley is not entitled to 

mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used 

only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court,

426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 

509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is 

available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the 

relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 

135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988).

To the extent that Eley seeks to compel his counsel to 

act in his official capacity, we do not have jurisdiction to 

grant mandamus relief against state officials. Gurley v. 

Superior Court of Mecklenburg Cnty., 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 

1969). To the extent that Eley seeks to compel his counsel to 

act in any other capacity, his request is beyond the scope of 

mandamus relief. See In re Braxton, 258 F.3d 250, 261 (4th Cir.

2001) (providing that party seeking writ of mandamus must 

establish, inter alia, that requested act “is an official act or 

duty”).
3

The relief sought by Eley is not available by way of 

mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### Provident Savings Life Assurance Society, appellee, v. City of Omaha et al., appellants.

Filed October 20, 1904.

No. 13,825.

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Alexander C. Troup, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*C. C. Wright*and *W. H. Herdman,*for appellants.

*J. J. Sullivan*and *Greene, Breckenridge & Kinsler, contra.*

By the Commission.

This case differs from that of *Aachen & Munich Fire Ins. Co. v. City of Omaha, ante,*p. 518, only in the kind of insurance appellee writes. The decision in that case is decisive of this also. It is therefore recommended that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

By the Court:

For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, it is ordered that the judgment of the district court be •

Affirmed.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Levee Trail Adventure

Ste. Geneviève National Historical Park
EXHIBIT 31.1

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Richard E. Stoddard, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Kaiser Ventures LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this amended annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this amended report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                                       
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2006 |  | /s/ Richard E. Stoddard               
|                     |  | Richard E. Stoddard                   
|                     |  | Chairman of the Board, President & CEO
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# 10 CFR 20.203 (f) Enforcement Guidance for Container Labels

## HPPOS-027 PDR-9111210147

See the memorandum from A. F. Gibson to Radiation Support Section dated March 7, 1980. This memo contains enforcement guidance for container labels in 10 CFR 20.203 (f) and states that the purpose of labels is to ensure adequate information is available to enable a worker to handle the materials safely.

The health physics position was written in the context of 10 CFR 20.203, but it also applies to the "new" 10 CFR Part 20, Sections 20.1904 and 20.1905. HPPOS-028 contains a related topic.

A label required pursuant to 10 CFR 20.203 (f) [and 10 CFR 20.1904] must bear the radiation caution symbol and the words "CAUTION, ADIOACTIVE MATERIAL" or "DANGER, RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL", as well as provide sufficient information that includes the radiation levels, kinds of material, estimates of activity, date the activity was estimated, mass enrichment, etc. This is required to permit individuals handling or using the container or working in the area to take necessary precautions to avoid or minimize exposure and ensure worker safety.

Unlabeled containers are almost a certainty in any large facility, such as a power plant. If the discovery of unlabeled containers constitutes isolated occurrences, enforcement action may not be appropriate. However, a very high radiation level container left unlabeled would be a safety hazard, as well as a strong indicator of a defect in the licensee's radioactive materials control program.

Should noncompliance with 10 CFR 20.203 [or 10 CFR 20.1904] be suspected, it must be determined whether control is being exercised by other methods described in 10 CFR 20.203 (f) (3) [or 10 CFR 20.1905].

In addition, the calculations used to determine greater than Appendix C quantities present in the container should be included in the discussion section of the Inspection Report. It must be emphasized to the licensee that the purpose of 10 CFR 20.203 (f) [and 10 CFR 20.1904] is to ensure adequate information is available to workers to enable them to safely handle radioactive materials and minimize exposure.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 20.203, 10 CFR 20.1904, 10 CFR 20.1905

**Subject codes:** 4.7, 12.7

**Applicability:** All

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 02, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 1:20-CV-22603-GOODMAN

ERIK CHAVEZ, individually, and

on behalf of others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

GRILL ENTERPRISES, LLC, a 

Florida Limited Liability Company, d/b/a 

Los Parrilleros and Parrilleros Tavern, and 

RUBEN SIERRA, individually,

 Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 

ALLOW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM

FOR USE DURING EACH DAY OF TRIAL

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for Leave to 

Allow Electric Equipment in the Courtroom for Use During Each Day of Trial, and the Court 

after having considered the Motion, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED;

Yeison Gonzalez is permitted to bring his cellular phone, iPad, and charging cables into the 

courthouse for the duration of the trial in this cause.

DONE AND ORDERED this ____ day of May 2023.

_________________________________________

JONATHAN GOODMAN

United States Magistrate Judge

Copies furnished to:

All counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-22603-JG Document 174-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
### §3308. Supplementary provision

Except as provided in this subchapter, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relating to principal and agent, estoppel, laches, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, insolvency, or other validating or invalidating cause shall apply to actions and proceedings under this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVI, §3611, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4964.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Nov. 29, 1990, and applicable with respect to certain actions for debts owed the United States pending in court on that effective date, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101–647, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.
#### DUNN, Respondent, v. GAMBLE, Appellant.

(199 N. W. 457.)

(File No. 5362.

Opinion filed June 26, 1924.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Aurora County; Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge.

Supplemental opinion on rehearing.

For former opinion, see 198 N. W. 821, 47 S. D. 303.

*R. C. Bakewpll*and *D. K. Barrett,*both of Plankinton, for Appellant.

*Donald Fellozvis,*of Plankinton, and *W. D. Shottse,*of White Lake, for Respondent.

P'OLLEY, J.

The opinion in this case was filed on the 28th day of April. Both sides have filed a petition for a rehearing, respondent because he thinks our conclusion is wrong, and appellant because he does not know what is the intended result of the opinion.

In reply to respondent’s petition we have only to say that we are satisfied with the conclusion reached.

Replying to appellant: Where we said in the closing paragraph of the opinion, “Defendant has two more votes than plaintiff and should be declared elected,” we meant that on the filing of the remittitur the circuit court should enter a final decree in favor of defendant, and to take whatever steps that might be "necessary to oust plaintiff from the office in question and to put defendant in.

Petitions for rehearing are denied.

Note. — Reported in 199 N. W. 457.
SCI 001710

CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-153 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### Edward Dalrymple et al., Respondents, v. Village of Randolph, Appellant. Henry J. Smith, Respondent, v. Village of Randolph, Appellant.

Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See 276 App. Div. 818.]
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund VI, L.P. (the Registrant) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F.
Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the
Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III                              
|                                                      
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief Executive
Officer May 10, 2004





|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                              
|                                                        
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial
Officer May 10, 2004
----

----

Berichtigungen

----

Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung der allgemeinen Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AD/8-16/05 für die Bildung einer Einstellungsreserve von Verwaltungsrätinnen und Verwaltungsräten im Sprachenbereich (A*9 — Konferenzdolmetscherinnen und Konferenzdolmetscher) tschechischer, estnischer, ungarischer, litauischer, lettischer, maltesischer, polnischer, slowenischer und slowakischer Sprache

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 117 A vom 19. Mai 2005)

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 152 A vom 23. Juni 2005)

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 273 A vom 4. November 2005)

(2005/C 325 A/01)

Seite 35, Titel A, Punkt II.2:

anstatt:

muss es heißen:

Seite 40, Titel C:

anstatt:

„Anmeldeschluss ist der 22. Juni 2005. Die Online-Anmeldungen werden um 12.00 Uhr (mittags), Brüsseler Zeit, beendet.“

muss es heißen:

„Anmeldeschluss ist der 31. Januar 2006. Die Online-Anmeldungen werden um 12.00 Uhr (mittags), Brüsseler Zeit, beendet.“

Seite 40, Titel C Punkt 1 dritter Absatz Fußnote 8:

anstatt:

„Bis spätestens den 22. Juni 2005 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags), Brüsseler Zeit.“

muss es heißen:

„Bis spätestens den 31. Januar 2006 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags), Brüsseler Zeit.“

Seite 41, Titel C Punkt 2 erster Absatz Fußnote 10:

anstatt:

„Spätestens am 22. Juni 2005, es gilt das Datum des Poststempels.“

muss es heißen:

„Spätestens am 31. Januar 2006, es gilt das Datum des Poststempels.“

----