alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.426

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182247 dated April 06, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Mobile radio telephone communication services in the allocated telecommunications network

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until April 06, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 06, 2020 No. 145-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ A.A.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS 
   COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF COMMUNICATIONS,
   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119302
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-064 April 12, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, ON APRIL 27

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has

scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on thermal-hydraulic phenomena on April 27 in Rockville,

Maryland.

The subcommittee will continue discussion of the agency’s proposed “Transient and Accident

Analysis Methods” Regulatory Guide and the “Review of Analytical Computer Codes” section of the

Standard Review Plan. It will then formulate proposed positions and actions for deliberation by the

full committee.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s

Two White Flint North Building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, from 8:30 a.m. until noon.

Those who seek additional information on the meeting or schedule changes should contact Paul

Boehnert, at 301-415-8065.

Other aspects of the meeting are described in the April 7 edition of the Federal Register. ACRS

meeting notices, transcripts and letter reports are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

###
(No. 798

Claim denied.)

#### The United States Corporation Bureau, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Publication *notice*— when *State not liable for.*Where publication notices are made by direction and authority of a State department compensation for same should be made out of the appropriation to that department.

Wirt E. Humphrey, for claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General ; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a case brought to recover compensation for publication notices against delinquent corporations, asking for dissolution of said corporations, total amount of claim being $1004.75, and declaration alleges that the claimant, acting by authority and direction of Samuel E. Erickson, clerk of the superior court of Cook county, published said legal notices in the *National Corporation Reporter*in its editions dated April 7th, April 14th, April 21st, June 9th, June 12th, and June 23rd, copies of said legal notices being attached to and made part of the declaration.

The demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois is, as a matter of law, sustained. This claim should have been paid by the Attorney General from appropriations allotted to him during the period above set forth, and we do not feel that there are any grounds, either of equity or social justice, which warrant the allowance of this claim, hence the demurrer is sustained.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Applicability of Access Controls for Spent Fuel Pools

## HPPOS-016 PDR-9111210116

See the memorandum from L. B. Higginbotham to A. B. Davis dated July 9, 1980. Spent fuel pool areas are not high radiation areas due to the inaccessibility of highly radioactive materials stored in the pool. If a diver enters the pool or upon movement of highly radioactive materials stored in the pool, then proper health physics controls must be instituted. The health physics position was written in the context of 10 CFR 20.203, but it also applies to "new" 10 CFR 20.1601.

A review was made of the applicability of 10 CFR 20.203 (c) (2) [or 10 CFR 20.1601 (a)] to spent fuel pools. Materials in spent fuel pools that could cause an individual to receive a dose equivalent to the total body in excess of 100 mrem in one hour are normally ten or more feet below the surface of the pool. Under these conditions, spent fuel-pool areas are not high radiation areas due to their inaccessibility to personnel performing "above pool-surface duties", and therefore, the requirements of 10 CFR 20.203 (c) (2) [or 10 CFR 20.1601 (a)] do not apply.

However, when a diver enters the pool to perform "under pool-surface duties" or upon movement of highly radioactive materials stored in the pool, proper health physics controls must be instituted. See IE Information Notice No. 83-31 dated July 28, 1982 (HPPOS-002).

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 20.203, 10 CFR 20.1601, Regulatory Guide 8.38, Technical Specifications

**Subject codes:** 4.1

**Applicability:** Reactors

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 02, 2017
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Baker, Willis and Overton 

Argued at Norfolk, Virginia 

DAVID LAMONT MACK 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 0983-95-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON 

 JUNE 11, 1996 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 

 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF CHESAPEAKE 

 Russell I. Townsend, Jr., Judge 

 Erik P. Gordon (Law Offices of Allen J. 

Gordon, on brief), for appellant. 

 Monica S. McElyea, Assistant Attorney General 

(James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on 

brief), for appellee. 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 

 David Lamont Mack was convicted by a jury of armed robbery 

in violation of Code § 18.2-58 and use of a firearm in the 

commission of a robbery in violation of Code § 18.2-53.1. He 

argues on appeal that the trial judge erred in admitting evidence 

of another robbery charge against Mack and its accompanying 

confession. 

 Evidence of other crimes need not bear such an exact 

resemblance to the crime on trial as to constitute a "signature"; 

it need only bear "a singular strong resemblance to the pattern 

of the offense charged." Spencer v. Commonwealth, 240 Va. 78, 

90, 393 S.E.2d 609, 616 (1990) (quoting United States v. Hudson, 

884 F.2d 1016, 1021 (7th Cir. 1989)). The evidence will be 
- 2 - 

admitted "where the other incidents are 'sufficiently 

idiosyncratic to permit an inference of pattern for purposes of 

proof,' thus tending to establish the probability of a common 

perpetrator." Id.

 Upon review of the record, construing the evidence in the 

light most favorable to the Commonwealth and granting to it all 

reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom, we cannot say 

that the decision below was plainly wrong or unsupported by the 

evidence. 

 Accordingly, the convictions are affirmed. 

 Affirmed.
0-cr-06216-LSS Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2000 Pa
Exhibit 4.439

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182541 dated July 15, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Telematic services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until July 15, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 23, 2020 No. 172-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Terlyakov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here

Official seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS

OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE

OF COMMUNICATIONS,
   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

AND MASS MEDIA

PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119594
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Keith Marshall

(12692)

Peters, C. J., Shea, Dannehy, Santaniello and Callahan, Js.

Argued March 4

decision released March 25, 1986

*Louis S. Avitabile,*with whom, on the brief, was *Richard V. Ackerson,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Marcia B. Smith,*assistant state’s attorney, with whom were *Patricia King,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, and, on the brief, *John Connelly,*state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

Per Curiam.

After examining the record on appeal and after considering the briefs and the arguments of the parties, we have concluded that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted. The issues have been fully considered in the opinion of the Appellate Court; *State*v. *Marshall,*3 Conn. App. 126, 485 A.2d 930 (1985); and it would serve no useful purpose for us to repeat the discussion therein contained.

The appeal is dismissed.
Editorial Note on Part 121
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 121 appear at 72 FR 50039 and 50040, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 121.1206 How will potential offerors be notified of applicable waivers? ( a ) Contracting officers must provide written notification to potential offerors of any waivers being applied to a specific acquisition, whether it is a class waiver or a contract specific waiver. This notification must be provided at the time a solicitation is issued. If the notification is provided after a solicitation is issued, the contracting officer must provide potential offerors a reasonable amount of additional time to respond to the solicitation.
( b ) If a contracting officer does not provide notice, and additional reasonable time for responses when required, then the waiver cannot be applied to the solicitation. This applies to both class waivers and individual waivers.
[81 FR 34260, May 31, 2016]
No: IV-24-005 January 26, 2024 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128 

NRC Proposes $18,000 Civil Penalty Against International Isotopes

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed an $18,000 civil penalty against 

International Isotopes of Idaho Falls, Idaho, for a violation of NRC requirements associated with its 

use of radioactive materials. The violations were documented in an October 2023 inspection report. 

International Isotopes uses radioactive materials in the manufacture of devices for medical 

and industrial applications. 

The violation involves the company’s manufacture and distribution of a permanently sealed 

capsule of radioactive material with a higher activity level than authorized by its NRC license. The 

violation had no adverse impact on the health and safety of the public. 

The NRC issued its enforcement decision after reviewing the circumstances surrounding the 

proposed violation and considering any actions the company may have taken to comply with NRC 

regulations. 

The company has 30 days to pay the fine, dispute it, or request involvement from a neutral 

third-party mediator to resolve the issue.
### [§6039B. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–514, title XIII, §1303(b)(5), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2658]

Section, added Pub. L. 95–600, title VI, §601(b)(4), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2896; amended Pub. L. 96–595, §3(b), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3466, related to returns of general stock ownership corporations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 22, 1986, see section 1311(f) of Pub. L. 99–514, as amended, set out as an Effective Date; Transitional Rules note under section 141 of this title.
HomeAbout NRCSafety Culture

# Safety Culture and Nuclear Security

Following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Commission issued orders enhancing security at facilities whose operations, if attacked, could have an impact on public health and safety. During the early years of implementation of these security enhancements, several violations of the Commission's security requirements were identified in which the licensee's failure to cultivate a positive safety culture impacted the effectiveness of the licensee's security program. The most visible of these involved security officers sleeping in a "ready room" while on shift at a nuclear power plant. Most of the weaknesses involved inadequate management oversight of security, lack of a questioning attitude within the security organization, complacency, barriers to raising concerns about security issues, and inadequate training of security personnel.

As stated in the Safety Culture Policy Statement, organizations should ensure that personnel in the safety and security sectors have an appreciation for the importance of each, emphasizing the need for integration and balance to achieve both safety and security in their activities. Safety and security activities are closely intertwined. While many safety and security activities complement each other, there may be instances in which safety and security interests create competing goals. It is important that consideration of these activities be integrated so as not to diminish or adversely affect either; thus, mechanisms should be established to identify and resolve these differences. A safety culture that accomplishes this would include all nuclear safety and security issues associated with NRC regulated activities.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 20, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Safety Culture Policy Statement
          - Safety Culture and Nuclear Reactors
          - Safety Culture and Nuclear Materials
          - Safety Culture and Nuclear Security
          - Information for Agreement States
          - Safety Conscious Work Environment
          - Outreach and Education Materials
          - Public Meetings and Presentations
          - Contact Us

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Related Information

            - Safety Culture Policy Statement
            - Policy Statement on the Conduct of Nuclear Power Plant Operations (54 FR 3424; January 24, 1989)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 20, 2020
Exhibit
      23










**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





The
      Board
      of Directors


Crescent
      Financial Corporation and subsidiaries





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 16, 2007
      on
      the consolidated financial statements included in the 2006 Annual Report on
      Form
      10-K of Crescent Financial Corporation (the “Registrant”) and subsidiaries in
      the following registration statements on Form S-8 filed by the Registrant under
      the Securities Act of 1933: 333-137235 filed as of September 11, 2006;
      333-136522 filed as of August 11, 2006; 333-126871 filed as of July 25, 2005;
      333-108456 filed as of September 3, 2003; 333-68974 and 333-68990 both filed
      as
      of September 5, 2001.









Raleigh,
      North Carolina


March
      28,
      2007
E - 2
§ 113.510 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment and hiring.* A recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and hiring of employees. Where a recipient has been found to be presently discriminating on the basis of sex in the recruitment or hiring of employees, or has been found to have so discriminated in the past, the recipient shall recruit members of the sex so discriminated against so as to overcome the effects of such past or present discrimination.
( b ) *Recruitment patterns.* A recipient shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at entities that furnish as applicants only or predominantly members of one sex if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 113.500 through 113.550.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

 CASE NO.: 0:20-cv-61290-AHS

HOWARD COHAN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BOCA GAS COMPANY HOLDINGS 2 LLC

a Florida Limited Liability Company

d/b/a 50TH STREET SHELL

Defendant(s).

____________________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

The Plaintiff, HOWARD COHAN, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby 

notifies the Court that the instant action has settled. Accordingly, the Parties expect to file a 

stipulation of dismissal within thirty (30) days and should not be required to file any further 

responses, motions, and/or pleadings.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED March 4, 2021.

By: /s/ Gregory S. Sconzo

Gregory S. Sconzo, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 0105553

Sconzo Law Office, P.A.

3825 PGA Boulevard, Suite 207

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410

Telephone: (561) 729-0940

Facsimile: (561) 491-9459

Email: greg@sconzolawoffice.com 

Secondary Email: alexa@sconzolawoffice.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 0:20-cv-61290-AHS Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 4, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being 

served this day on counsel of record in this action via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing 

generated by CM/ECF.

_ /s/ Gregory S. Sconzo

Gregory S. Sconzo, Esq.

Case 0:20-cv-61290-AHS Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2021 Page 2 of 2
HomeAbout NRCInternational ProgramsExport-Import

# Public Involvement in Export-Import Licensing

ADAMS10 CFR 110.7010 CFR 110.8010 CFR 110.8110 CFR 110.82Public Involvement in Licensing

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, January 13, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Preparations for the Export of Advanced Reactors
          - U.S. Policy Framework on Civil Nuclear Cooperation with China For Exports Pursuant to 10 CFR 110
          - Appendix P : "Export and Import of Radioactive Material: Security Policies" (RIN 3150-AH44) Effectiv
          - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) About Export-Import Licensing
          - Export-Import License Types
          - Part 110 Update:  "Export and Import of Nuclear Equipment and Material: Updates and Clarifications" 
          - General Licenses
          - Specific License Requirement for ALL Exports to Embargoed Destinations
          - Specific Licenses
          - License Terms
          - Fees
          - Public Involvement in Export-Import Licensing

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, January 13, 2021
#### In the Matter of the Probate of a Paper Writing Propounded as the Last Will and Testament of Julia Lorillard Butterfield, Deceased.

Motion granted and order signed. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.B



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2003, of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Keith B. Forman, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                      /s/ Keith B. Forman
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Keith B. Forman
                                      Vice President and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                      (Principal Financial Officer)
                                      GulfTerra Energy Company L.L.C., general
                                      partner of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P.

                                      August 12, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. and will be retained by GulfTerra
Energy Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.