alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ORGANIZATION OF 

AGREEMENT STATES (OAS)

Annual Meeting

August 16-19, 2021 Philadelphia

By Theresa Clark & Nancy Hebron-Isreal

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Health Physics Workforce Strategy – Building Our Technical Future

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY ANDSAFEGUARDS

PIPELINE

• Scholarship and Fellowship Grants

...providing a pathway to the radiation 

protection industry (not just the NRC)

...developing science and engineering 

curricula at universities

• University Champions

...connecting with school leadership

• Greater Awareness

...advertising NRC jobs with Health Physics 

Society and Radiation Research Society

...teaching summer hires what we do

DEVELOPMENT

• Cross-Training

...building agility across mission areas

• Cross-Jurisdictional Opportunities

...partnering with states to create a 

framework for rotational assignments

• Strategic Workforce Planning

...identifying skill needs and gaps for 

health physics and relevant specialties

COMMUNITY

• Skills Catalog

...identifying in-house experts and 

specialists in an accessible way

• Community of Practice

...networking within the agency to foster 

collaboration

• Partnership

...building relationships with State and 

Federal agencies on this shared need

Meet our newest

radiation professionals!

NRC Fellowship and Scholarship recipients could help your state 

too! For more, contact Nancy Hebron-Isreal and Kim English, or 

search "NRC university" on grants.gov (open through 10/4/2021).
No: 23-059 September 15, 2023 

CONTACT: Holly Harrington, 301-415-8200 

NRC to Hold Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Regulatory Applications

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is holding a public workshop on Sept. 19 to discuss 

the agency’s activities to ensure the safe and secure use of AI in NRC-regulated activities. The 

“Data Science and AI Regulatory Applications Workshop,” which is the agency’s fourth in the 

series, will provide an opportunity for the public, stakeholders and experts to discuss regulatory 

and technical aspects of AI usage in nuclear applications. The AI workshops support 

implementation of the NRC AI Strategic Plan. 

NRC Chair Christopher T. Hanson will be providing opening remarks. The agenda for 

the upcoming workshop, and details on the three previous workshops held in 2021, are available 

on the NRC’s website. Slides for the Sept. 19 workshop are available here. 

This workshop, hosted by the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, will focus 

on various AI characteristics impacting regulatory considerations. It will take place from 

10 a.m.-4 p.m. Eastern time in the Commissioners’ Conference Room at NRC headquarters at 

11555 Rockville Pike in Rockville, Maryland. Those unable to attend in person can participate 

virtually on Microsoft Teams. All participants are requested to register online.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-61238-CIV-SMITH 

JANET CARASQUILLO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the United States Magistrate Judge’s Amended Report 

[DE 24], in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for 

Attorney’s Fees and Costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“Motion”) [DE 21] be granted

in part and denied in part. No objections have been filed. 

In her Motion, Plaintiff seeks an award of $400.00 in costs and $5,135.85 in fees for 23.7 

hours of attorney work as follows: (i) for 3.8 hours at an hourly rate of $207.78 in 2020; (ii) for 

17.8 hours at an hourly rate of $217.54 in 2021; and (iii) for 2.1 hours at an hourly rate of $225.75 

in 2022. The Government concedes that the hourly rate billed by Plaintiff’s attorney is reasonable

and does not object to Plaintiff’s claim for $400.00 as the cost for filing her action. However, the 

Government objects to 1.2 hours expended on clerical tasks during 2020 as non-compensable, and

to 10.9 hours spent to draft and complete the fact summary for Plaintiff’s motion for summary 

judgment as excessive. The Magistrate Judge agrees. The Magistrate Judge recommends reducing 

the number of compensable hours to draft and complete the fact summary by 4 hours and 

disallowing the 1.2 hours for the itemized clerical tasks. In sum, the Magistrate Judge recommends 

Case 0:20-cv-61238-RS Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/28/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

that Plaintiff be awarded fees in the amount of $4,016.35, instead of the requested $5,135.85, as 

follows:

Year Hours 

Claimed

Adjusted 

Hours

Hourly 

Rate

Amount 

Claimed

Adjusted 

Amount

2020 3.8 hours 2.6 hours $207.78 $789.56 $540.22

2021 17.8 hours 13.8 hours $217.54 $3,872.21 $3,002.05

2022 2.1 hours 2.1 hours $225.75 $474.08 $474.08

Totals 23.7 hours 18.5 hours -------- $5,135.85 $4,016.35

Therefore, after reviewing the Report and Recommendation, the record, and given that 

neither party objects, it is 

ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs under the Equal

Access to Justice Act [DE 21] be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

2. Plaintiff is awarded $4,016.35 in fees and $400 in costs to be paid to Plaintiff’s

counsel once the U.S. Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff owes no debt to the 

United States.

3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

4. This case is CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 27th day of April 2022. 

cc: Counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-61238-RS Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/28/2022 Page 2 of 2
### §540A. Investigation of violent crimes against travelers

(a) In General.—At the request of an appropriate law enforcement official of a State or political subdivision, the Attorney General and Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation may assist in the investigation of a felony crime of violence in violation of the law of any State in which the victim appears to have been selected because he or she is a traveler.

(b) Foreign Travelers.—In a case in which the traveler who is a victim of a crime described in subsection (a) is from a foreign nation, the Attorney General and Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and, when appropriate, the Secretary of State shall assist the prosecuting and law enforcement officials of a State or political subdivision to the fullest extent possible in securing from abroad such evidence or other information as may be needed for the effective investigation and prosecution of the crime.

(c) Definitions.—In this section—

(1) "felony crime of violence" means an offense punishable by more than one year in prison that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another.

(2) "State" means a State, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.

(3) "traveler" means a victim of a crime of violence who is not a resident of the State in which the crime of violence occurred.

(Added Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXII, §320916(a), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2129; amended Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §604(b)(21), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–294 designated three undesignated pars. as pars. (1) to (3).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–294 effective Sept. 13, 1994, see section 604(d) of Pub. L. 104–294, set out as a note under section 13 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
| Exhibit 23.1 |
|--------------|

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.’s 333-87236 and 333-105187 andForm S-3 No.’s 333-104886 and 333-109108) pertaining to the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,the 34 million shares of Common Stock of a Selling Shareholder, and the 4.25% Convertible Notes, respectively, of ExpressJetHoldings, Inc., of our report dated February 24, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofExpressJet Holdings, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Houston, TexasFebruary 24, 2006
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 80

**Question 80:** The revised Part 20 (§20.1003) provides definitions of "member of the public," "public dose," and "occupational dose." These definitions are not consistent with the definition of "member (s) of the public" defined (for nuclear power plants) in Generic Letter 89-01, Supplement 1 (NUREGs 1301 and 1302).

Consider that typically, one would expect any individual entering the "restricted area" would be considered to be occupationally exposed and not classified as a "member of the public." All individuals, including utility employees, their contractors, and delivery people outside the "restricted area," in the "controlled area," would be considered as "members of the public." The only exceptionis where a utility employee or its contractor doing work in a portion of the "controlled area" where public access has been restricted due to radiological exposure considerations. This concept is consistent with the revised rule.

Will the definitions of "member (s) of the public" in Generic Letter 89-01, Supplement 1 (NUREGs 1301 and 1302)be changed to be consistent with the definition of "member of the public" in the revised Part 20?

**Answer:**Yes. The NUREGs themselves will not be changed; however, in a forthcoming Generic Letter on mode l Technical Specifications that incorporate provisions of revised Part 20, the definition of "member (s) of the public" will be changed to be consistent with revised Part 20. See Question 26 and answer in the fourth set of questions and answers for clarification of the definition of "occupational dose."

(References: 10 CFR 20.1003, NUREG-1301, NUREG-1302).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, December 13, 2017
Shaffer’s appeal was abated due to bankruptcy. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; Tex. R. App. P. 8. 1

Shaffer’s motion to dismiss has been authorized by the bankruptcy trustee; it appears that all stays

are now lifted pursuant to the Chapter 11 confirmation plan of July 26, 2005.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00595-CV

Harriet “Hatsy” Heep Shaffer, Appellant

v.

Alien, Inc.; Strategic Land Management Consultants, L.L.C.; Clark Wilson

Homes, Inc.; Capital Pacific Holdings, L.L.C.; Gary Bradley; Bradley

Development, Inc.; SH-45 Development, L.L.P.; SH-45

Development, G.P., Inc.; and Lazarus

Development, L.L.P., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN002699, HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Harriet “Hatsy” Heep Shaffer has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

1

 

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: November 4, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. Section. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diametrics Medical, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W. Glen
Winchell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                            /s/ W. Glen Winchell
                                            --------------------------------
                                            W. Glen Winchell
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            September 15, 2005

                                       15
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
     UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 INCLUDED IN
     THE AMENDED QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10QSB/A FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         10,533,486
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     429,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (40,296)
<INVENTORY>                                        22,771
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,159,004
<PP&E>                                          2,838,949
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (416,508)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,726,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,151,838
<BONDS>                                           215,106
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                           228
<COMMON>                                            3,625
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,335,617
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13,726,414
<SALES>                                           112,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,670,878
<CGS>                                              70,288
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,022,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                8,502,632
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   33,177
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,964,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,712,485)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,712,485)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,712,485)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (2.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (2.07)



</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-10124.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 27, 2006.

Susan B. Cowger, Linda R. Rossborough, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Scottie D. Allen, Dallas, TX, Cheryl B. Wattley, Law Offices of Cheryl B. Wattley, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Christopher Thompson appeals from his jury-verdict conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, possession of a firearm in a school zone, possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, and possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance near a school. He argues on appeal that the evidence produced at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict on all four counts because it did not establish that he knowingly possessed the firearm or the crack cocaine. As Thompson concedes, he did not move for a judgment of acquittal at the end of the Government’s case or at the close of all evidence.

When viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, the evidence shows that Thompson knowingly possessed the firearm and the crack cocaine found in the vehicle he was driving shortly before his arrest. Accordingly, Thompson’s conviction on all four counts does not constitute a manifest miscarriage of justice. *See United States v. Griffin,*324 F.3d 330, 356 (5th Cir .2003).

*364The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.
OWEN ARVIE THOMPSON , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 22

- 0156 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR1997

- 012793 The Honorable Kathleen H. Mead , Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Krista Wood C ounsel for Respondent Owen Arvie Thompson , Florence Petitioner FILED 11-22-2022STATE v. THOMPSON Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Jennifer M. Perkins, Judge James B. Morse Jr. , and Judge Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court

.

PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Owen Arvie Thompson seeks review of the superior court's order dismissing his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's third petition after being retried but his fourth in the case overall

. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show th at the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief and amended petition for review. Petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review but deny relief.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.4 Severability.

Any provision of this part held to be invalid or unenforceable as applied to any person, entity, or circumstance shall be construed so as to continue to give the maximum effect to such provision as permitted by law, including as applied to persons or entities not similarly situated or to dissimilar circumstances, unless such holding is that the provision of this part is invalid and unenforceable in all circumstances, in which event the provision shall be severable from the remainder of this part and shall not affect the remainder thereof.

[89 FR 34101, Apr. 30, 2024]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency   

          - [FEMA-1549-DR]   

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.   

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1549-DR), dated September 15, 2004, and related determinations.   

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 4, 2004.   

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.   

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Alabama is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 15, 2004:

Chambers, DeKalb, Henry, Houston, Jackson, Lauderdale, Limestone, Morgan, and Russell Counties for Individual Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Michael D. Brown,   

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security.   

[FR Doc. 04-22865 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]   

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
**Exhibit
      32(ii)**





**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing Financial
      Statements**


**pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002**





The
      undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, **(i)** the Form
      10-K filed by Crescent Financial Corporation  (the
      “Issuer”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      and **(ii)** the
      information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates
      and
      for the periods presented therein.




Date:
                March 10, 2008
            
            By:
            /s/
                Bruce W. ElderBruce
                W. ElderVice
                President (Principal Financial
                Officer)