alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 
  

	
	





 THIS CERTIFIES THAT: 
Shareholder Name 
IS REGISTERED AS THE HOLDER OF: 
**X** 
SHARES: 
Ordinary shares 
SPECIMEN 
of X shares, with a nominal value of twenty-five euro cent (EUR 0.25) each, of
Arrival, a société anonyme governed by the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, with registered office at 1, rue Peternelchen, L-2370 Howald, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, incorporated following a
deed of the undersigned notary, of 27 October 2020, published in the Luxembourg electronic platform of companies and associations (Recueil Electronique des Sociétés et Associations) number RESA_2020_246.1214 of 3 November
2020 and registered with the Luxembourg Register of Commerce and Companies under number B 248209 (the “Company”). This certificate assures his owner, as registered in the shareholders’ register of the Company, of any rights which,
pursuant to the articles of incorporation, are attached to the ownership of the shares of the Company. It may be exchanged at any moment at the registered office of the Company or at the places designated by it against other certificates
representing in total the same number of shares. 
See reverse for certain definitions. 
CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 
XXXXXXXXXX 
DATED: 
DD.MM.YYYY 
CUSIP: L0423Q108 
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES: 
AVINASH RUGOOBUR 
DIRECTOR 
PETER CUNEO 
DIRECTOR 
KRISTEN O’HARA 
DIRECTOR 
REGISTERED SHARE CERTIFICATE 
ARRIVAL 
1, RUE PETERNELCHEN 
L-2370 HOWALD 
GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG 













	
	





 DATED: 
SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED: 
The Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions with membership in an approved
Signature Guarantee Medallion Program, pursuant to S.E.C. Rule 17Ad-15 under the securities exchange act of 1934, as amended (or any successor rule)). 
Notice: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the certificate in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any
change whatever. 
Arrival 
The Company will furnish without charge to each
shareholder who so requests, a statement of the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of equity or series thereof of the Company and the qualifications, limitations, or
restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. This certificate and the shares represented thereby are issued and shall beheld subject to all the provisions of the Articles of Association of the Company. The following abbreviations, when used in
the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
TEN COM:
as tenants in common 
TEN ENT: as tenants by the entireties 
JT TEN: as joint
tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common 
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT: 
Custodian 
CUST 
MINOR 
under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act 
STATE 
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsProtein crystal growth in low gravityThe effect of low gravity on the growth of protein crystals and those parameters which will affect growth and crystal quality was studied. The proper design of the flight hardware and experimental protocols are highly dependent on understanding the factors which influence the nucleation and growth of crystals of biological macromolecules. Thus, those factors are investigated and the body of knowledge which has been built up for small molecule crystallization. These data also provide a basis of comparison for the results obtained from low-g experiments. The flows around growing crystals are detailed. The preliminary study of the growth of isocitrate lyase, the crystal morphologies found and the preliminary x ray results are discussed. The design of two apparatus for protein crystal growth by temperature control are presented along with preliminary results.Document ID19900017347Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsFeigelson, Robert S.*(Stanford Univ. CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategorySolid-State PhysicsReport/Patent NumberSU-CMR-90-5NASA-CR-186243NAS 1.26:186243Accession Number90N26663Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG8-774Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017347.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### [§6016. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–364, title I, §103(a), June 28, 1968, 82 Stat. 260]

Section, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 738; Feb. 26, 1964, Pub. L. 88–272, title I, §122(d), 78 Stat. 29, Nov. 13, 1966, Pub. L. 89–809, title I, §104(l), 80 Stat. 1563, provided for the declaration of estimated income tax by corporations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1967, except as provided by section 104 of Pub. L. 90–364, see section 103(f) of Pub. L. 90–364, set out as an Effective Date of 1968 Amendment note under section 243 of this title.
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2007      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            |                               |                                                            |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            | PAPERWEIGHT      DEVELOPMENT CORP. |
|                            |                               |                                                            |
| Dated:      March 11, 2008 |                               | /s/      Mark R. Richards                                       |
|                            | Name:                              |   Mark      R. Richards                               |
|                            | Title:                             |   Chairman,      President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 390

**Question 390:** During 1993, there may be radiation workers transiting between licensees that have, and have not, implemented the revised Part 20. 
> 
(a) In the case of a worker whose dose was monitored earlier in the year at a licensee that has implemented the revised Part 20 and is now in processing at a licensee that has not implemented the revised Part 20: (1) Should "whole body dose" be taken as the "total effective dose equivalent" (TEDE) or as the "deep dose equivalent" (DDE) recorded by the previous licensee? (2) If the individual has received dose in excess of an "old" Part 20 limit for the current quarter, but less than the respective revised Part 20 limit for the year (e.g., shallow dose equivalent to an extremity of 20 rems for both the current quarter and year to date), is the individual unavailable for any further exposure in that dose category for the remainder of the quarter? (3) If the individual has received dose in excess of the "implied annual limit" of the "old" Part 20, but less than the respective annual limit in the revised Part 20 (e.g., shallow dose equivalent to the skin of 35 rems in the current quarter and year to date), is the individual unavailable for further exposure in that dose category for the remainder of the year? (4) If the individual has received a planned special exposure (PSE) at the previous workplace in the current quarter, how should the PSE dose be accounted for as prior occupational dose by the present licensee under the "old" Part 20? Should the PSE dose be subtracted from the available current quarter dose for that dose category?

(b) In the case of a worker whose dose was monitored earlier in the year at a licensee that has not implemented the revised Part 20 and is now inprocessing at a licensee that has implemented the revised Part 20: if the individual has received recorded internal dose (in terms of rem) or internal exposure (in terms of MPC-hrs) or internal uptake (in terms of organ burden), how should this data be considered with regard to revised Part 20 requirements (i.e., TEDE, CEDE, or CDE)?

**Answer:**
> 
(a) (1) DDE. (2) Yes, the individual is "unavailable for any further exposure in that dose category for the remainder of the quarter" because the individual has already exceeded the applicable dose limit for the quarter. (3) The individual is unavailable for further exposure in that dose category for the remainder of the quarter (because the individual has exceeded the applicable dose limit for the quarter), but is available for further exposure in that dose category for the remainder of the year after the end of the quarter. (4) The PSE dose should be accounted for as occupational dose received during the quarter and should be subtracted from the available current quarter dose for the dose category.

(b) CEDE. 

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.2104)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, November 27, 2017
No: II-24-006 April 10, 2024 

Contact: Dave Gasperson, 404-997-4417 

NRC Schedules Open House Meeting to Discuss 

Safety Performance of Framatome Facility

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for April 16 to discuss 

its two-year safety performance review of the Framatome nuclear fuel fabrication facility in 

Richland, Washington. 

The event is scheduled to run from 6-8 p.m. Pacific at the Richland Community Center, 

500 Amon Park Drive in Richland. NRC employees responsible for inspecting the Framatome 

facility will be available to answer questions and provide additional information. 

The open house format allows more interaction with the NRC staff and facilitates one-onone and small-group discussions. It also gives flexibility to nearby residents and others who wish to 

attend. Posters covering the agency’s inspections and its review of the facility’s operations will be 

available. 

NRC assessed performance at the Framatome facility from Jan. 1, 2022, through Dec. 31, 

2023, in safety operations, safeguards, radiological controls, facility support, and other areas. The 

NRC staff found that Framatome continued to conduct its activities safely and met NRC 

requirements for protecting workers, nearby residents, and the environment. 

The NRC does not have resident inspectors at the Framatome facility, but fuel facility 

inspectors from its Atlanta regional office conduct periodic inspections of various aspects of the 

operation. These inspections occur multiple times a year. 

A copy of the NRC letter to the company about the performance is available on the NRC 

website.
#### New York Electric Lines Company v. Empire City Subway Company.

— Motion granted unless appellant complies with, terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MAURICIO SALAZARCARRANZA, a.k.a. Joe Salazar, Jr.,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-72137

Agency No. A023-075-675

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 12, 2013** 

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Jose Mauricio Salazar-Carranza, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying

FILED

MAR 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-72137

his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8

U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review. 

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s order because Salazar-Carranza is

removable for an aggravated felony crime of violence based on his conviction for

second-degree robbery in violation of California Penal Code § 211. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(a)(2)(C); United States v. McDougherty, 920 F.2d 569, 573-74 (9th Cir.

1990) (conviction under California Penal Code § 211 is categorically a crime of

violence).

Salazar-Carranza’s challenge to the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen so

that he may pursue post-conviction relief does not raise a colorable constitutional

claim that would restore our jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). See

Planes v. Holder, 652 F.3d 991, 996 (9th Cir. 2011) (a conviction is final for

immigration purposes where a judgment of guilt has been entered and a

punishment imposed, even where an appeal or collateral attack is pending). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
### §1873. Admiralty and maritime cases

In any case of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction relating to any matter of contract or tort arising upon or concerning any vessel of twenty tons or upward, enrolled and licensed for the coasting trade, and employed in the business of commerce and navigation between places in different states upon the lakes and navigable waters connecting said lakes, the trial of all issues of fact shall be by jury if either party demands it.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 953.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §770 (R.S. §§566, 648; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §291, 36 Stat. 1167).

Words "and Territories" following words "in different States" were omitted as obsolete. The act of February 26, 1845, ch. 20, 5 Stat. 726, from which this language was derived was intended primarily to cover the Great Lakes regions.

The first sentence of section 770 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., providing generally for the right of jury trials in district courts, was omitted as covered by Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Note on Part 115
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 115 appear at 72 FR 50038, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 115.20 Insolvency of Surety. ( a ) *Successor in interest.* If a Surety becomes insolvent, all rights or benefits conferred on the Surety under a valid and binding Prior Approval or PSB Agreement will accrue only to the trustee or receiver of the Surety. SBA will not be liable to the trustee or receiver of the insolvent Surety except for the guaranteed portion of any Loss incurred and actually paid by such Surety or its trustee or receiver under the guaranteed bonds.
( b ) *Filing requirement.* The trustee or receiver must submit to SBA quarterly status reports accounting for all funds received and all settlements being considered.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 116

**Question 116:** 10 CFR 20.2101 (b) requires the licensee to make a clear distinction among the dose quantities entered on the records and gives examples of the following different dose quantities: total effective dose equivalent, shallow dose equivalent, eye dose equivalent, deep dose equivalent, committed effective dose equivalent.

Does this mean (for example) that the dose rates measured during surveys of external radiation fields must be recorded in terms of one of these dose quantities or (as another example) that the results of air sampling must be recorded in terms of one of these quantities?

**Answer:** No. The examples given refer to dose quantities used for doses to individuals, not to dose (or activity) quantities used in surveys of areas. 

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.2101)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017
Exhibit 4.423

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182244 dated April 06, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Mobile radio telephone communication services in the allocated telecommunications network

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until April 06, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 06, 2020 No. 145-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ A.A.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here

Official seal:
    MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS,
   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119299
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Consideration of Measurement Uncertainty When Measuring Radiation Levels Approaching Regulatory Limits

## HPPOS-223 PDR-9111220129

See the memorandum from J. W. N. Hickey and L. J. Cunningham to M. R. Knapp (and others) dated August 3, 1990.

The memo states that as with any regulation, limits must be given as exact, precise values. The method of demonstrating compliance with these limits is usually left to the regulated person. Any method that provides a reasonable demonstration of compliance will be accepted.

The NMSS and NRR Offices became aware of a letter transmitting a notice of violation that appeared to send an incorrect message to licensees. The incorrect message was that licensees must consider inherent uncertainties when measuring radiation levels approaching regulatory limits and must establish procedural limits that are less than the regulatory limits by an amount that equals (or exceeds) the "instrument error." That message is incorrect.

The following statement was made by the NRC in response to a petition for rule making with regard to limits for surface radiation levels of packages prepared for transport (44 FR 22233, April 13, 1979): "As with any regulation, the (safety) limits must be given as exact, precise values.

The methods of demonstrating compliance with these limits are usually left to the regulated person. Any method which provides a reasonable demonstration of compliance will be accepted. In most cases, exact measured values are not required." This statement is still valid.

All measurements are inherently imprecise and inaccurate to some degree. Inevitably, there will be cases involving transportation of radioactive materials in which a valid measurement by the shipper shows a radiation level below the limit and a valid measurement by the receiver shows a radiation level above the limit. Without evidence that the shipper's measurement is invalid, there is no reason to assume that the shipper's measurement is incorrect and, consequently, that the shipper had inadequate control over shipping of packages.

The NRC position is that the result of a valid measurement obtained by a method that provides a reasonable demonstration of compliance or of noncompliance should be accepted and that the uncertainty inherent in that measured value need not be considered in determining compliance or non-compliance with a regulatory limit. Thus, only the measured value (and not the sum of the measured value and its uncertainty) need be less than the value of the limit to demonstrate compliance with the limit.

Conversely, only the measured value (and not the measured value less its uncertainty) need be greater than the value of the limit to demonstrate non-compliance with the limit.

**Regulatory references:** None

**Subject codes:** 6.6, 7.1, 12.7

**Applicability:** All

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, October 18, 2017
**EXHIBIT23**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of MedicalCV, Inc. onForm S-8 (Nos. 333-75344, 333-97435, 333-108373, 333-124465, 333-124466,333-128534, and 333-128536) of our report dated July 25, 2007, appearing in theForm 10-KSB Annual Report of MedicalCV, Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2007.
|                                         |
|----------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Lurie Besikof Lapidus & Company, LLP |   |   |
|                                         |   |
| Lurie Besikof Lapidus & Company, LLP     |   |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota                       |   |
|                                         |   |
| July 25, 2007                                |   |

 

----
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Argosy Gaming Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dale R. Black, Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Dale R. Black                           |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dale R. Black                                     |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| August 12, 2002                              |

 

----