alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.1316 Can a Judge reconsider an appeal decision? ( a ) Any party who has appeared in the proceeding, or SBA, may request reconsideration of the OHA appeal decision by filing with the Judge and serving a petition for reconsideration on all the parties to the appeal within twenty (20) calendar days after service of the written decision. The request for reconsideration must clearly show an error of fact or law material to the decision. The Judge may also reconsider a decision on the Judge's own initiative, within twenty (20) calendar days after issuance of the written decision.
( b ) The Judge may remand a proceeding to the D/HUB for a new HUBZone status protest determination if the D/HUB fails to address issues of decisional significance sufficiently, does not address all the relevant evidence, or does not identify specifically the evidence upon which it relied. Once remanded, OHA no longer has jurisdiction over the matter, unless a new appeal is filed as a result of the new HUBZone status protest determination.
### [§44C. Renumbered §23]
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateEnforcementIssued Significant Enforcement Actions

# 2019 Non-Licensee Actions

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Framatome (EA-18-119)

On September 12, 2019, the NRC issued a Notice of Violation to Framatome (a Florida Power and Light Contractor) for a Severity Level III violation of NRC requirements involving employee protection. Framatome willfully discriminated against a Framatome contract employee for engaging in a protected activity in the Spring of 2017. Specifically, a Framatome contract employee who raised safety concerns during the St. Lucie Nuclear Plant (St. Lucie) refueling outage had a scheduled work assignment to Turkey Point Nuclear Plant cancelled by Framatome managers shortly after submitting a condition report at St. Lucie. The NRC determined that the actions of Framatome management were, in part, based on the contractor’s engagement in a protected activity.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 20, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024 Reactor Actions
          - 2023 Reactor Actions
          - 2022 Reactor Actions
          - 2021 Reactor Actions
          - 2020 Reactor Actions
          - 2024 Materials Actions
          - 2023 Materials Actions
          - 2022 Materials Actions
          - 2021 Materials Actions
          - 2020 Materials Actions
          - 2024 Individual Actions
          - 2023 Individual Actions
          - 2022 Individual Actions
          - 2021 Individual Actions
          - 2020 Individual Actions
          - 2020 Non-Licensee Actions
          - 2019 Non-Licensee Actions
          - 2016 Non-Licensee Actions
          - 2015 Non-Licensee Actions
          - 2014 Non-Licensee Actions
          - 2023 Fuel Cycle Facilities
          - 2019 Fuel Cycle Facilities
          - 2018 Fuel Cycle Facilities
          - 2017 Fuel Cycle Facilities
          - 2016 Fuel Cycle Facilities

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 20, 2020
EXHIBIT A 

Case 1:20-cv-22471-DPG Document 107-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/04/2021 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO.: 20-cv-22471-DPG 

NORTH AMERICAN SUGAR INDUSTRIES, 

INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

XINJIANG GOLDWIND SCIENCE & 

TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., GOLDWIND 

INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS (HK) LTD., 

DSV AIR & SEA INC., BBC CHARTERING 

USA, LLC and BBC CHARTERING 

SINGAPORE PTE LTD., 

Defendants. 

/ 

DECLARATION OF ZHANG YEHENG IN SUPPORT OF 

XINJIANG GOLDWIND SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD.’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION 

I, Zhang Yeheng, declare as follows: 

1. My name is Zhang Yeheng. I am over the age of 21 and am competent to make 

this Declaration. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein. 

2. Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co. Ltd. (“Goldwind Science”) is an 

international enterprise registered and organized under the law of the People’s Republic of China 

(“China”) that specializes in manufacturing wind turbine generators and technology. 

3. Goldwind Science’s registered office is at No. 107, Shanghai Road, Economic & 

Technology, Development District, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China. 

4. I have been employed at Goldwind Science since 2015, and I am currently the head 

of its Financial Management Department. My role involves supervising Goldwind Science 

financial matters. 

Case 1:20-cv-22471-DPG Document 107-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/04/2021 Page 2 of 4
2 

5. Goldwind Science is not a party to any contracts with “Vessel Operating Common 

Carriers,” including BBC Chartering USA, LLC or BBC Chartering Singapore PTE LTD, 

regarding Cuba La Herradura I. 

6. Goldwind Science is not a party to any contracts with “Non-Vessel Operating 

Common Carriers,” including DSV Air & Sea Inc., regarding Cuba La Herradura I. 

7. Goldwind Science did not negotiate or sign the Cuba La Herradura I contract in 

Florida or the U.S. 

8. Goldwind Science does not sell or manufacture any of its products in Florida. 

9. Goldwind Science has not commissioned any of its products in Florida. 

10. Goldwind Science is not registered to do business in Florida, and has no offices or 

registered agents in Florida. 

11. Goldwind Science has no operations in the broader U.S. and is not registered to do 

business in any state in the U.S. 

12. Goldwind Science does not maintain a phone number or mailing address in the U.S. 

13. Goldwind Science has no bank accounts in the U.S. 

14. Goldwind Science has no direct U.S. affiliate or subsidiary. 

15. Other than this lawsuit brought by North American Sugar Industries Inc., Goldwind 

Science has never been a party, either as a plaintiff or a defendant, in any lawsuit in the United 

States. 

16. Goldwind Science has been a party to only one arbitration with its situs in the U.S., 

which was completed in 2018. 

Case 1:20-cv-22471-DPG Document 107-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/04/2021 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:20-cv-22471-DPG Document 107-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/04/2021 Page 4 of 4
**Exhibit 12.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Werner Wenning, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Bayer AG; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:March 15, 2007
    /s/Werner Wenning Title: Chairman of the Board of Management
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case No.: 1:20-cv-22760-KMM

ABDULLA MONTHER, and other similarly 

situated individuals,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

ALKAFAWEEN FOOD STORE, INC d/b/a 

Midway Food Market f/k/a S&M Grocery, Inc. 

f/k/a Alqurneh LLC; ZAQU, INC. d/b/a Midway 

Food Market f/k/a S&M Grocery, Inc. f/k/a 

Alqurneh LLC; MAJED M. ALKAFAWEEN; 

and MOHAMMED ISSA ALQURNEH,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, ABDULLA MONTHER, by and through undersigned counsel, and pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), hereby voluntarily dismisses this action without 

prejudice. The undersigned is unaware of any settlement that has been reached in this matter, or 

whether this case has otherwise been resolved.

Dated: September 1, 2020. Respectfully submitted,

Aron Smukler

Aron Smukler, Esq. (FBN: 0297779)

E-mail: asmukler@saenzanderson.com

SAENZ & ANDERSON, PLLC

20900 NE 30th Avenue, Ste. 800

Aventura, Florida 33180

Telephone: (305) 503-5131

Facsimile: (888) 270-5549

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:20-cv-22760-KMM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2020 Page 1 of 1
### ) /") • U'\ 

# }tA5

,.,......, ....**-·~!?'c.~. ~-r"'** 



### r. t'i 

# c 0\ V' i'""' 

# e, 

# f!c 7

# ~.-**P.~J a,,.,~~~**  

# e
·'

...... . . l ••• {**~\.;;** ""' ..,..... . {,....**-~** "<e: 

# S' e 

# v' ot r"'ll. 

# e**~'"** f· 

## If 

## /l}r,

.{**'~** 

### / d:J/

### ~,f"<~ ·

### r~~;~ ¥

### -~
## y1-\E

~ 

### ;- -. -, ... r>hp ,~ 

## * \ t>i-. ,t



### 12 

### Pi-

## A t.; 

### iQ.; 

## G S

## Ef;,= 

## 09 

## SEP 30 

## RIP 

## 9:52

Bill Richardson Governor 

# State 

# of 

# New Mexico ~_ffice 

## ofthe Guvernor September 24,2009

Mr. Lany E. Starfield Acting Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 

### 6 1445 Ross Avenue Dallas, TX 75202-271 1 Dear Mr. Starfield: This letter is submitted to fulfill New Mexico's requirements under Section 107 (d)(l) of the Clean Air Act. The Clean Air Act requires all state governors to submit initial designations within one year of the promulgation of a new or revised National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). In November of 2008, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency promulgated a revised NAAQS for lead. The New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) has determined that there are no sources that emit one ton per year or greater of lead in New Mexico within the jurisdiction ofNMED (all of New Mexico except for Bernalillo County and tribal lands). 

### I recommend attainment status of the lead NAAQS for all areas ofNew Mexico within the jurisdiction of NMED. Sincerely,

Bill Richardson Governor of New Mexico

cc: Mr. Ron Curry, Secretary, New Mexico Environment Department Ms. Mary Uhl, Chief, Air Quality Bureau Mr. Jim Norton, Director, Environmental Protection Division Mr. Alfredo Santistevan, Director, Environmental Health Dept. City of Albuquerque

State Capitol Room 400 SantaFe, New Mexico 87501 505-476-2200 www.govemor.state.nm.us
Editorial Note on Part 124
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 124 appear at 72 FR 50040, Aug. 30, 2007, and 76 FR 8253, Feb. 11, 2011.

§ 124.402 How does a Participant develop a business plan? ( a ) *General.* In order to assist the SBA servicing office in determining the business development needs of its portfolio Participants, each Participant must develop a comprehensive business plan setting forth its business targets, objectives, and goals.
( b ) *Submission of initial business plan.* Each Participant must submit a business plan to its SBA servicing office as soon as possible after program admission. SBA will suspend a Participant from receiving 8(a) BD program benefits, including 8(a) contracts, if it has not submitted its business plan to the servicing district office within 60 days after program admission. Where a sole source 8(a) requirement is offered to SBA on behalf of a Participant or a Participant is the apparent successful offeror for a competitive 8(a) requirement and SBA has not yet approved the Participant's business plan, SBA will approve the Participant's business plan as part of its eligibility determination prior to contract award.
( c ) *Contents of business plan.* The business plan must contain at least the following: ( 1 ) A detailed description of any products currently being produced and any services currently being performed by the concern, as well as any future plans to enter into one or more new markets;
( 2 ) The applicant's designation of its primary industry classification, as defined in § 124.3;
( 3 ) An analysis of market potential, competitive environment, and the concern's prospects for profitable operations during and after its participation in the 8(a) BD program;
( 4 ) An analysis of the concern's strengths and weaknesses, with particular attention on ways to correct any financial, managerial, technical, or work force conditions which could impede the concern from receiving and performing non-8(a) contracts;
( 5 ) Specific targets, objectives, and goals for the business development of the concern during the next two years;
( 6 ) Estimates of both 8(a) and non-8(a) contract awards that will be needed to meet its targets, objectives and goals; and
( 7 ) Such other information as SBA may require.
[63 FR 35739, June 30, 1998, as amended at 85 FR 66186, Oct. 16, 2020; 88 FR 26205, Apr. 27, 2023]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-61296-CIV-DIMITROULEAS/SNO

BURBERRY LIMITED, A UNITED 

KINGDOM COMPANY, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

FCHYT, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT 

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of Final Default 

Judgment against Defendants (the “Motion”) [DE 44], filed herein on October 13, 2020. The Court 

has carefully considered the Motion [DE 44] and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

On September 22, 2020, the Clerk entered a default against Defendants, the Individuals, 

Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule “A” to Plaintiffs’ instant 

Motion (collectively “Defendants”) for failure to appear, answer or otherwise plead to the amended 

complaint filed herein within the time required. See [DE 40]. Thereafter, on October 13, 2020, 

Plaintiffs filed the instant Motion [DE 44] seeking a default judgment against Defendants. On 

October 14, 2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this Motion should not be granted 

[DE 47]. Defendants failed to respond.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Plaintiffs’ Motion [DE 44] is hereby GRANTED. 

2. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, a separate final judgment will 

be entered.

Case 0:20-cv-61296-WPD Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/29/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

3. Plaintiffs are ordered to serve a copy of this Order upon Defendants via e-mail to the 

e-mail accounts provided by each Defendant as part of the data related to its ecommerce store or website, including customer service e-mail addresses and onsite 

contact forms, or via the e-commerce platform e-mail for each of the e-commerce stores 

or registrar of record for the domain name; and by publicly posting a true and accurate 

copy of the foregoing on Plaintiffs’ designated serving notice website appearing at 

http://servingnotice.com/BuR7Z5/index.html.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 

28th day of October, 2020.

Copies provided to:

Counsel of Record

Case 0:20-cv-61296-WPD Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/29/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Thomas F. Walsh, Jr., Appellant, against Harry W. Marsh et al., Constituting the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Mo opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glen-non, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
No: I-23-009 July 26, 2023 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector

at Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Neil 

Day as the senior resident inspector at the Beaver Valley nuclear 

power plant in Shippingport, Pennsylvania. He joins resident 

inspector Ron Rolph at the two-unit site, which is operated by 

Energy Harbor. 

“Neil Day’s broad experience in both the reactor and 

nuclear materials realms means he is well-positioned to take on 

this new role,” said NRC Region I Administrator Ray Lorson. 

“The skills he has acquired will help the NRC maintain a strong 

onsite presence at Beaver Valley.”

Day joined the NRC in 2008 as a structural engineer in the 

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards at the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, 

Maryland. He subsequently worked as a project engineer in the Division of Reactor Projects in the 

NRC’s Region I Office, and later as a resident inspector at the Grand Gulf nuclear power plant in 

Mississippi and the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant in Texas. 

Day holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Pennsylvania State 

University. 

Each operating U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident 

inspectors who serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, 

monitoring safety-significant projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident 

inspectors can serve at a reactor site for up to seven years.
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 232A/21 s

| | ISSN 1725-2466 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 232A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 48o anno21 settembre 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2466

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 232A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

48o anno21 settembre 2005

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Informazioni |
| | Commissione |
| 2005/C 232A/1 | Pubblicazione di un posto vacante di direttore esecutivo dell'Agenzia comunitaria di controllo della pesca (Grado A*14) — COM/2005/10004 | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

III   Informazioni

Commissione

2005/C 232A/1

Pubblicazione di un posto vacante di direttore esecutivo dell'Agenzia comunitaria di controllo della pesca (Grado A*14) — COM/2005/10004

1

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

III Informazioni

Commissione

| 21.9.2005 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 232/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2005

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 232/1

---

PUBBLICAZIONE DI UN POSTO VACANTE DI DIRETTORE ESECUTIVO DELL'AGENZIA COMUNITARIA DI CONTROLLO DELLA PESCA

(Grado A*14)

COM/2005/10004

(2005/C 232 A/01)

L'Agenzia comunitaria di controllo della pesca intende nominare un direttore.

I candidati devono essere cittadini di uno degli Stati membri dell'Unione europea.

Il direttore sarà nominato dal Consiglio di amministrazione dell'Agenzia sulla base di un elenco di candidati selezionati e proposti dalla Commissione europea. Il direttore sarà assunto come agente temporaneo di grado A*14, ai sensi dell' articolo 2, lettera a), del regime applicabile agli altri agenti delle Comunità europee, per un periodo della durata di cinque anni, che potrà essere prorogato per un periodo di durata non superiore a cinque anni. L'Agenzia e la Commissione applicano una politica di pari opportunità.

La descrizione delle mansioni, i moduli per la presentazione delle candidature e le istruzioni per l'invio di tali moduli sono disponibili su Internet ai seguenti indirizzi:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

o

http://europa.eu.int/comm/fisheries

Il termine per la presentazione delle candidature è fissato al 21 ottobre 2005 (fa fede il timbro postale).

---
#### § 5451.4 Payment bond.

To obtain permission to (a) cut and remove timber, or (b) remove timber already cut, which has been secured by an increased performance bond as provided for in § 5451.2, before payment of the first or subsequent installments, the purchaser must obtain a payment bond in an amount equal to one or more installment payments as determined by the authorized officer. The payment bond may be a bond of a corporate surety shown on the approved list issued by the U.S. Treasury Department and executed on an approved form or negotiable securities of the United States. The payment bond may be a bond of a corporate surety shown on the approved list issued by the United States Treasury Department and executed on an approved form, negotiable securities of the United States, or any guaranteed remittance approved by the authorized officer. If a bond of a corporate surety is used, the payment bond shall provide that if the purchaser fails to make payment as required by § 5461.2(c) of this chapter, the surety will make such payment including any required interest to the Bureau within 60 days after demand therefor by the Bureau. With the written approval of the authorized officer a single blanket payment bond may be allocated to two or more contracts with the same purchaser in the same Bureau of Land Management administrative district. When operations cease for 60 days or more, the amount of a payment bond may be adjusted downward to an amount equal to the value of the timber cut. Before operations resume, a reduced bond shall be increased to the amount of a full installment.

[38 FR 6281, Mar. 8, 1973, as amended at 46 FR 42674, Aug. 24, 1981; 47 FR 38697, Sept. 2, 1982]
-cr-06216-LSS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2000 P