alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00239-CV

In the MATTER OF L.K.T.S., A Child

From the 289th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-JUV-02048B

Honorable Carmen Kelsey, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 18, 2011

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). No costs shall be assessed against appellant because she is indigent. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 20.1.

PER CURIAM
----

----

I Mitteilungen

Kommission

----

Euro-Wechselkurs (1)

12. Januar 2006

(2006/C 8/01)

1 Euro= 

----

(1)

Quelle: Von der Europäischen Zentralbank veröffentlichter Referenz-Wechselkurs.

----

----

Informationsverfahren — Technische Vorschriften

(2006/C 8/02)

(Text von Bedeutung für den EWR)

Richtlinie 98/34/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 22. Juni 1998 über ein Informationsverfahren auf dem Gebiet der Normen und technischen Vorschriften und der Vorschriften für die Dienste der Informationsgesellschaft (ABl. L 204 vom 21.7.1998, S. 37; ABl. L 217 vom 5.8.1998, S. 20)

Der Kommission übermittelte einzelstaatliche Entwürfe von technischen Vorschriften

Die Kommission möchte auf das Urteil „CIA Security“ verweisen, das am 30. April 1996 in der Rechtssache C-194/94 (Slg. I, S. 2201) erging. Nach Auffassung des Gerichtshofs sind Artikel 8 und 9 der Richtlinie 98/34/EG (ehemalige 83/189/EWG) so auszulegen, dass Dritte sich vor nationalen Gerichten auf diese Artikel berufen können; es obliegt dann den nationalen Gerichten sich zu weigern, die Anwendung einer einzelstaatlichen technischen Vorschrift zu erzwingen, die nicht gemäß der Richtlinie notifiziert wurde.

Dieses Urteil bestätigt die Mitteilung der Kommission vom 1. Oktober 1986 (ABl. C 245 vom 1.10.1986, S. 4).

Die Missachtung der Verpflichtung zur Notifizierung führt damit zur Unanwendbarkeit der betreffenden technischen Vorschriften, die somit gegenüber Dritten nicht durchsetzbar sind.

Weitere Informationen zum Notifizierungsverfahren erhalten Sie unter folgender Adresse:

Besuchen Sie auch die Webseite: http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/tris/

Eventuelle Auskünfte zu den Notifizierungen sind bei den nachstehenden nationalen Dienststellen verfügbar:

LISTE DER FÜR DIE UMSETZUNG DER RICHTLINIE 98/34/EG ZUSTÄNDIGEN NATIONALEN STELLEN

BELGIEN

TSCHECHISCHE REPUBLIK

DÄNEMARK

DEUTSCHLAND

ESTLAND

GRIECHENLAND

SPANIEN

FRANKREICH

IRLAND

ITALIEN

ZYPERN

LETTLAND

LITAUEN

LUXEMBURG

UNGARN

MALTA

NIEDERLANDE

ÖSTERREICH

POLEN

PORTUGAL

SLOWENIEN

SLOWAKEI

FINNLAND

SCHWEDEN

GROSSBRITANNIEN

EFTA-ÜBERWACHUNGSBEHÖRDE

TÜRKEI

----

(1)  Jahr, Registriernummer, Staat.

(2)  Zeitraum, in dem der Entwurf nicht verabschiedet werden kann.

(3)  Keine Stillhaltefrist, da die Kommission die Begründung der Dringlichkeit anerkannt hat.

(4)  Keine Stillhaltefrist, da es sich um technische Spezifikationen bzw. sonstige mit steuerlichen oder finanziellen Maßnahmen verbundene Vorschriften (Artikel 1 Nummer 11 Absatz 2 dritter Gedankenstrich der Richtlinie 98/34/EG) handelt.

(5)  Informationsverfahren abgeschlossen.

----

----

Mitteilung der Kommission im Rahmen der Durchführung der Richtlinie 98/79/EG des Rates

(2006/C 8/03)

(Text von Bedeutung für den EWR)

Veröffentlichung der Titel und der Bezugsdaten der harmonisierten Normen im Sinne dieser Richtlinie

----
SHELBY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT POLLUTION CONTROL SECTION PUBLIC HEARING- SCHD AUDITORIUM DATE & TIME December 15,2015@ 5:30p.m. REPRESENTING

s L-li.D C.'-u 

### "'b ADDRESS 

### -- .. , .. --·-·--

### NAME 

# SHELBY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT POLLUTION CONTROL SECTION PUBLIC HEARING

- SCHD AUDITORIUM DATE & 

### TIME December 15, 2015@ 5:30p.m. 

### REPRESENTING **{,.,~** 

## 5 **-------·······-~----····** -------·-· - 

# riC
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Parts 43 and 64 
          - [IB Docket Nos. 02-324 and 96-261, FCC 04-53; DA 04-671] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rules; announcement of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

This document containing information collection requirements announces the effective date of the rules published on April 28, 2004 and July 2, 2004. Those rules modified the application of its International Settlements Policy. 

# DATES:

The amendments to §§ 43.51(d), 43.51(e), 64.1001, and 64.1002(c) published at 69 FR 23151 (April 28, 2004) are effective on October 25, 2004. The amendments to § 64.1001, adopted in 69 FR 40326 (July 2, 2004) are effective on October 26, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Reitzel, (202) 418-1460. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On March 3, 2004, the Commission released a Report and Order adopting a number of amendments to the Commission's rules regarding the International Settlements Policy (ISP), a summary of which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                     *See*69 FR 23151, April 28, 2004. We stated that the rules were effective on May 28, 2004, except for those sections containing new information collection requirements, which required approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Additional revisions to § 64.1001 were adopted later, 69 FR 29894 (May 26, 2004), and a correction to those later revisions was published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                     *See*69 FR 40326, July 2, 2004. The information collection requirements were approved by OMB on September 30, 2004. See OMB No. 3060-0454. This publication satisfies our statement that the Commission would publish a document announcing the effective date of the rules.                 

Federal Communications Commission. 

William F. Caton, 

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04-23093 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
BY EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of EntreMed, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael M. Tarnow, as
Executive Chairman of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the dates and periods covered by the
Report.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.





/s/ Michael M. TarnowAugust
      16, 2010
                Michael
      M. Tarnow
                  Executive
      Chairman
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State 

v. Weber, Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-4225.] 

NOTICE 

This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an 

advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to 

promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 

South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other 

formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before 

the opinion is published. 

SLIP OPINION NO. 2019-OHIO-4225

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. WEBER, APPELLANT.

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it 

may be cited as State v. Weber, Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-4225.] 

Certification of conflict dismissed as having been improvidently certified.

(No. 2018-1670―Submitted October 2, 2019―Decided October 21, 2019.) 

CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Fairfield County, 

No. 17-CA-36, 2018-Ohio-3174. 

_________________ 

{¶ 1} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been 

improvidently certified. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, 

and KLATT, JJ., concur. 

WILLIAM J. KLATT, J., of the Tenth District Court of Appeals, sitting for 

STEWART, J. 

_________________ 

Thomas R. Elwing, for appellant. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

_________________
----

----

III Oznámení

Komise

----

VYHLÁŠENÍ VÝBĚROVÉHO ŘÍZENÍ NA MÍSTO PŘEDSEDY ODRŮDOVÉHO ÚŘADU SPOLEČENSTVÍ

(třída A*14)

(čl. 29 odst. 2 služebního řádu)

KOM/2005/10015

(2005/C 297 A/01)

Odrůdový úřad Společenství hledá pracovníka na pozici předsedy úřadu.

Uchazeči musejí být občany některého z členských států Evropské unie.

Předsedu jmenuje Rada ze seznamu kandidátů, které navrhne Komise po konzultaci se Správní radou úřadu. Platové a pracovní podmínky odpovídají podmínkám stanoveným pro úředníky Evropských společenství třídy A*14 ve služebním řádu. Odrůdový úřad Společenství a Komise uplatňují politiku rovných příležitostí.

Popis pracovní náplně, přihlášky a pokyny k zasílání přihlášek je možné získat na těchto internetových adresách:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

nebo

http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm

Uzávěrka přijímání přihlášek je 31. prosince 2005 (viz podrobnosti v pokynech k přihlášce).

----
##### 



Exhibit 11.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F (the Form 20-F) of
Telesystem International Wireless Corporation N.V., a Netherlands corporation
(the Company), for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned officer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to his knowledge:



| | 1. |  | the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and    
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|                      |  |          |  |                                                                                                    
|--------------------- |  | -------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: June 27, 2003: |  | (signed)
|                      |  |          |  |                                                                                                    
|                      |  |          |  | Kees van
Ravenhorst
Managing Director
(Principal executive officer and principal financial officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Department,

May, 1914.

#### Thomas B. Lockwood and Another, Respondents, v. The Title Insurance Company of New York, Appellant.

Judgement and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Foote, J., who dissented.
### SUBCHAPTER I—JOB TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE SYSTEM
### **CHAPTER 153—HABEAS CORPUS**

Sec.
2241.
Power to grant writ.
2242.
Application.
2243.
Issuance of writ; return; hearing; decision.
2244.
Finality of determination.
2245.
Certificate of trial judge admissible in evidence.
2246.
Evidence; depositions; affidavits.
2247.
Documentary evidence.
2248.
Return or answer; conclusiveness.
2249.
Certified copies of indictment, plea and judgment; duty of respondent.
2250.
Indigent petitioner entitled to documents without cost.
2251.
Stay of State court proceedings.
2252.
Notice.
2253.
Appeal.
2254.
State custody; remedies in Federal courts.
2255.
Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence.
[2256.
Omitted.]

#### Senate Revision Amendment

Chapter catchline was changed by Senate amendment. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–598, title II, §250(b), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2672, directed the addition of item 2256 "Habeas corpus from bankruptcy courts", which amendment did not become effective pursuant to section 402(b) of Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–711, §3, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1106, substituted "Federal courts" for "State Courts" in item 2254.
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateEnforcementAlternative Dispute Resolution

# Contact Us About Office of Enforcement's Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Program

For additional information about OE's ADR program, you may contact us via this form.

If you need to report a safety concern, please do not use this page. Instead, please see Report a Safety or Security Concern.

Would you like to remain anonymous?:*

YesNo

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 17, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Pre-Investigation ADR
          - Enforcement ADR
          - Trending Data
          - Background and Guidance Documents
          - Contact Us

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 17, 2023
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Relator, v. Public Service Commission for the Second District.

Motion denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS R. MONTOYA, AKA Carlos Montoya Ramos, AKA Rigoberto Carlos Ramos,

Petitioner,

v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 17

- 70928

Agency No. A094

- 459

- 045

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 2 , 2020 * *

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT , Circuit Judges.

Carlos R. Montoya
, a native and citizen of El Salvador
, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application s for cancellation of removal,

withholding of removal , and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”)

.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 4 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law,

Cerezo v. Mukasey , 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except to the extent that

deference is owed to the BIA’s interpretation of the governing statutes and

regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 37 1 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We review
for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453

F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.
In his opening brief, Montoya does not challenge the agency’s denial of

cancellation of removal. See Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072, 1079

- 80
(9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief

are waived). Thus, we deny the petition for review as to Montoya’s cancellation of

removal claim

. The BIA did not err in finding that Montoya did not establish membership in

a cognizable social group. See Reyes v. Lynch , 842 F.3d 1125, 1131 (9th Cir.

2016) ( in order to demonstrate membership in a particular social group, “[t]he
applicant must ‘establish that the group is (1) composed of members who share a

common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with particularity, and (3) socially

distinct within the so ciety in question’” (quoting Matter of M

- E

- V

- G

- , 26 I. & N.
Dec. 227, 237 (BIA 2014)) ). Thus, Montoya ’s withholding of removal claim fails.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

Montoya failed to show it is more likely th an not he will be tortured by or with the3

consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to El Salvador

. See Aden v.

Holder , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009) ; see also Wakkary v. Holder , 558

F.3d 1049, 1067

- 68 (9th Cir. 2009) (no likelihood of t orture)

.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateResearchFire Research Program

# Contact Us About the Fire Research and Regulation Knowledge Base

If you need to report a safety concern, please do not use this page. Instead, please see Report a Safety or Security Concern.

Would you like to remain anonymous?:*

YesNo

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 07, 2020
CHIEF JUSTICE

 CAROLYN WRIGHT

JUSTICES

 DAVID L. BRIDGES

 MOLLY FRANCIS

 DOUGLAS S. LANG

 ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

 ROBERT M. FILLMORE

 LANA MYERS

 DAVID EVANS

 DAVID LEWIS

 ADA BROWN

 CRAIG STODDART

 BILL WHITEHILL

 DAVID J. SCHENCK

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

600 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 200

DALLAS, TEXAS 75202

(214) 712-3400

LISA MATZ

CLERK OF THE COURT

(214) 712-3450

lisa.matz@5th.txcourts.gov

GAYLE HUMPA

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR

(214) 712-3434

gayle.humpa@5th.txcourts.gov

FACSIMILE

(214) 745-1083

INTERNET

HTTP://5TH.TXCOURTS.GOV

September 11, 2015

Jacob R. Higgins

Wisener Nunnally Roth, LLP

245 Cedar Sage Drive, Suite 240

Garland, TX 75040

Myra Edith Kirkland

Dallas County Probate Courts

509 Main Street, Records Building, Room 217

Dallas, TX 75202

Re: In The Guardianship of Ny’Dia Simmons, and Incapacitated Person # 05-15-00955-CV

Dear Attorneys:

Enclosed is a corrected page for the above-mentioned case. Please note the following typographical 

error, which has been corrected:

Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers replaces Opinion by Justice Francis

Please replace the page of your previous copy with the enclosed.

Sincerely,

/s/ Lisa Matz

Lisa Matz

Clerk of the Court

cc: Trial court judge

Trial court clerk
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Earn a Junior Ranger Badge

Mississippi National River & Recreation Area
McCarthy Road Mileposts*

Mile 14.5 Access road on the north to backcountry trails. Please respect private property 

by staying on the road.

Mile 15.8 Park on both sides of road for next 4 

miles.

Mile 19.8 Park on north side of road. Preserve 

on south side of road.

Mile 25.5 Preserve on both sides of road.

Mile 43.9 Road crosses Lakina River.

Mile 60.0 Road ends at the Kennicott River.

Note: Much of the land adjacent to the McCarthy Road is private property, or owned by 

the University of Alaska or the State of Alaska. 

Please respect the rights of private property 

owners. *Mileposts are based on existing road 

markers. Mileage may vary slightly from vehicle 

to vehicle. Look for signs marking land status 

changes.

McCarthy Road Subsistence Map

Department of the Interior

National Park Service

Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve
#### Edward Bell, Respondent, v. New York, Ontario and Western Railway Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mo opinion. Jenks, P. J., Carr,Rich andPutnam, JJ., concurred.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George Cova, Appellant.

Judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting the defendant of the crime of bookmaking (Penal Law, § 986), unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Rate Commission

# AGENCY:

Postal Rate Commission.

# ACTION:

 Notice of Commission visit.

# SUMMARY:

Postal Rate Commissioners and staff members will tour mail preparation facilities located in the vicinity of East Hartford, Connecticut on November 4 and 5, 2004. The purpose is to familiarize attendees with various postal-related operations, including those related to barcoding and sorting First-Class Mail.

# DATES:

1. November 4, 2004 (afternoon): PSI presentation/facility tour. 2. November 5, 2004 (morning): Pitney Bowes Tech Center tour; (afternoon): Pitney Bowes Management Services Mail Recovery Center tour.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 202-789-6818.

Steven W. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04-23241  Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M