alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateCRGR Reviews

# Results of Previous CRGR Reviews

The items reviewed by the CRGR reflect new and revised regulatory requirements, agency correspondence, regulatory guidance, and staff positions that the Committee To Review Generic Requirements (CRGR) has reviewed since January 1, 2007, along with the results of those reviews. Entries in the "Endorsing Document" column provide the accession number to be used in retrieving the document from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). "Pending" notations in the "Endorsing Document" column indicate that the given items are still predecisional and, therefore, not yet publicly available. Items reviewed by the CRGR prior to January 1, 2007, may be retrieved by searching ADAMS using related keywords. Please note that the below years refers to the annual CRGR review period.  This period begins on June 1 and ends on May 31 of the next year.

For more information, Contact Us About The Committee To Review Generic Requirements (CRGR).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 6, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - CRGR Membership
          - Procedures for Requesting a CRGR Review
          - Categories of CRGR Reviews
          - Content Requirements for Packages Submitted for CRGR Review
          - Results of Previous CRGR Reviews
          - Related Information About Backfitting and Regulatory Analysis
          - Contact Us

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 6, 2024
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-61242-CIV-SINGHAL/VALLE

ELIEZEL CARABALLO,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (DE [23])

of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed for lack of prosecution. On February 

22, 2021, the Magistrate Judge issued a Scheduling Order (DE [21]) requiring Plaintiff to 

file his Motion for Summary Judgment by April 23, 2021 (60 days from the date of the 

Order). Plaintiff failed to comply with the Scheduling Order. Thereafter, in October 2021, 

the Magistrate Judge issued an Order to Show Cause (DE [22]), again directing Plaintiff 

file his Motion for Summary Judgment by October 14, 2021. Plaintiff again failed to file 

his Motion for Summary Judgment or otherwise proceed in this action.

On November 4, 2021, the Magistrate Judge entered a Paperless Report and 

Recommendation recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice for lack 

of prosecution. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Report and Recommendation (DE [23]) of 

the Magistrate Judge is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. This case stands DISMISSED 

Case 0:20-cv-61242-AHS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/29/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case and DENY 

AS MOOT any pending motions.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 29th day of 

November 2021.

Copies furnished counsel via CM/ECF and

Plaintiff, pro se, by U.S. Mail

Case 0:20-cv-61242-AHS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/29/2021 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.223 Evidence. ( a ) *Federal Rules of Evidence.* Unless contrary to a particular rule in this part, or an order of the Judge, the Federal Rules of Evidence will be used as a general guide in all cases before OHA.
( b ) *Hearsay.* Hearsay evidence is admissible if it is deemed by the Judge to be relevant and reliable. Weight to be afforded hearsay evidence is at the discretion of the Judge.
[61 FR 2683, Jan. 29, 1996, as amended at 75 FR 47442, Aug. 6, 2010]
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.830 Reports a CDC must submit. A CDC must submit the following reports to SBA: ( a ) An Annual Report within one hundred-eighty days after the end of the CDC's fiscal year (to include Federal tax returns for that year). A CDC that is certified by SBA within 6 months of the CDC's fiscal year-end is not required to submit an Annual Report for that year. The Annual Report must include, but is not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Audited or Reviewed Financial Statements as required in § 120.826(c) and (d) for the CDC and any affiliates or subsidiaries of the CDC. ( i ) Audited financial statements must, at a minimum, include the following: ( A ) Audited balance sheet;
( B ) Audited statement of income (or receipts) and expenses;
( C ) Audited statement of source and application of funds;
( D ) Such footnotes as are necessary to an understanding of the financial statements;
( E ) Auditor's letter to management on internal control weaknesses; and
( F ) The auditor's report; and
( ii ) Reviewed financial statements must, at a minimum, include the following: ( A ) Balance sheet;
( B ) Statement of income (or receipts) and expenses;
( C ) Statement of source and application of funds;
( D ) Such footnotes as are necessary to an understanding of the financial statements;
( E ) The accountant's review report; and
( 2 ) Report on compensation: CDCs are required to provide detailed information on total compensation (including salary, bonuses and expenses) paid within the CDC's most recent tax year for current and former officers and directors, and for current and former employees and independent contractors with total compensation of more than $100,000 during that period.
( 3 ) Certification of members of the Board of Directors. Written annual certification by each Board member that he or she has read and understands the requirements set forth in § 120.823.
( 4 ) Report on investment in economic development. Written report on investments in economic development in each State in which the CDC has an outstanding 504 loan.
( b ) For each new associate and staff, a Statement of Personal History (for use by non-bank lenders and CDCs) and other information required by SBA;
( c ) Reports of involvement in any legal proceeding;
( d ) Changes in organizational status;
( e ) Changes in any condition that affects its eligibility to continue to participate in the 504 program; and
( f ) Quarterly service reports on each loan in its portfolio which is 60 days or more past due (and interim reports upon request by SBA).
( g ) Other reports as required by SBA.
[61 FR 3235, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 68 FR 57981, Oct. 7, 2003; 73 FR 75518, Dec. 11, 2008; 79 FR 15650, Mar. 21, 2014]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT MARY ROSE LOCKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. No. 96-2629 TOGO D. WEST, JR., Secretary of the Army, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95-1337-AMD) Submitted: April 30, 1998 Decided: May 26, 1998 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Mary Rose Lockett, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Donna Carol Sanger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: Mary Rose Lockett appeals from the district court's order denyingher motion for reconsideration from the court's order granting summary judgment for the Defendant on Lockett's employment discrimination claims. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm.This court reviews a district court's denial of a motion made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) for an abuse of discretion. See Werner v. Carbo , 731 F.2d 204, 206 (4th Cir. 1984). The motion is not intended to be used as a substitute for a timely and proper appeal. See Ackermann v. United States , 340 U.S. 193, 198 (1950). To be eligible for relief under Rule 60(b), the movant must make a showing of "timeliness, a meritorious defense, and a lack of unfair prejudice to the opposing party, and exceptional circumstances." Dowell v. State Fire & Cas. Auto Ins. Co. , 993 F.2d 46, 48 (4th Cir. 1993) (quoting Werner v. Carbo , 731 F.2d 204, 206-07 (4th Cir. 1984)). In her motion, Lockett claims that she did not understand the scheduling deadlines set by the court and also restates her conclusory allegations that Appellees discriminated against her in violation of Title VII and the ADA. We find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant the Rule 60(b) relief based upon Lockett's claim that her failure to timely respond to the summary judgment motion was excusable. Lockett did not obtain an extension of time to respond. Further, her claim that she believed that eachextension granted to the Defendant to file a motion for summary judgment automatically extended the time in which she could respond to the motion once it was filed is not sufficient to excuse noncompliance with the court's scheduling order. See Nemaizer v. Baker , 793 F.2d 58, 62 (2d Cir. 1986); Link v. Wabash R. Co. , 370 U.S. 626, 633-34 (1962). Thus, b ecause Lockett failed to make the required showing for relief under Rule 60(b), we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentionsare adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Zion
National Park
Utah


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Fire Management Options
 The National Park Service uses many tools to manage our resources. Fire is one such tool. By using a combination of fire management techniques we can both reduce the risk to the public from fire and also maintain healthy ecosystems.

Two fire crew members work to put out a fire at the edge of a large burned area.**Fire Suppression**
Extinguishing or limiting wildland fires at their discovery by utilizing the safest and most efficient suppression methods available

A fire crew member carrying a drip torch sets fire to a field of dry grass.Prescribed Fire
Any fire ignited by management specialists under predetermined conditions to meet specific objectives related to hazardous fuels or habitat improvement. An approved prescribed fire plan must exist prior to ignition.

A view from a plane, looking down on a plateau covered in juniper trees with a large column of smoke rising.**Fires for Resource Benefit**
The management of naturally ignited (lightning) wildland fires to accomplish specific pre-stated resource management objectives in predefined geographic areas outlined in Fire Management Plans.

Three members of a fire crew work with a chainsaw to cut and pile vegetation in a forest.**Mechanical Fuel Reduction**
The removal of natural vegetation with mechanized equipment and/or hand tools. Usually limbing and thinning vegetation and disposing of the material through pile burning.

A ranger sprays herbicide on an invasive tamarisk tree.**Chemical Fuel Treatment**
The use of herbicides to control unwanted vegetation. Follow-up treatments may include mechanical fuel reduction.
 Last updated: November 11, 2021
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: Zion National Park
1 Zion Park Blvd.
Springdale,
UT
84767
 Phone: 435-772-3256
If you have questions, please email zion_park_information@nps.gov.
Listen to recorded information by calling anytime 24 hours a day.
Rangers answer phone calls from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. MT, but a ranger may not answer if they are already speaking with someone else. Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
### §1494. Accounts of officers, agents or contractors

The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to determine the amount, if any, due to or from the United States by reason of any unsettled account of any officer or agent of, or contractor with, the United States, or a guarantor, surety or personal representative of any such officer, agent or contractor, and to render judgment thereof,1 where—

(1) claimant or the person he represents has applied to the proper department of the Government for settlement of the account;

(2) three years have elapsed from the date of such application without settlement; and

(3) no suit upon the same has been brought by the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 941; July 28, 1953, ch. 253, §9, 67 Stat. 226; Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1263, §44(c), 68 Stat. 1242; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §133(c)(1), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §287 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §180, 36 Stat. 1141; Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, §3, 43 Stat. 939).

Only the jurisdictional provisions of section 287 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., are contained in this section. The procedural provisions are incorporated in section 2511 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "United States Claims Court" for "Court of Claims".

1954—Act Sept. 3, 1954, struck out "United States" from name of Court of Claims.

1953—Act July 28, 1953, substituted "United States Court of Claims" for "Court of Claims", inserted "to or from" after "due", and inserted "and to render judgment thereon,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be "thereon,".
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA basis for solid modeling of gear teeth with application in design and manufactureA new approach to modeling gear tooth surfaces is discussed. A computer graphics solid modeling procedure is used to simulate the tooth fabrication process. This procedure is based on the principles of differential geometry that pertain to envelopes of curves and surfaces. The procedure is illustrated with the modeling of spur, helical, bevel, spiral bevel, and hypoid gear teeth. Applications in design and manufacturing are discussed. Extensions to nonstandard tooth forms, to cams, and to rolling element bearings are proposed.Document ID19920014959Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHuston, Ronald L.*(Cincinnati Univ. OH., United States)*Mavriplis, Dimitrios*(Miles Labs. Elkhart, IN., United States)*Oswald, Fred B.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Liu, Yung Sheng*(Cincinnati Univ. OH., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1992Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberAVSCOM-TR-91-C-044AD-A250302E-6782NAS 1.15:105392NASA-TM-105392Accession Number92N24202Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-36PROJECT: DA PROJ. 1L1-62211-A-47-AOTHER: NSG-3188Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920014959.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Part 115
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 115 appear at 72 FR 50038, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 115.22 Quarterly Contract Completion Report. The Surety must submit a Quarterly Contract Completion Report within 45 days after the close of each fiscal year quarter ending December 31, March 31, June 30, and September 30, that identifies each contract successfully completed during the quarter. The report shall include: ( a ) The SBA Surety Bond Guarantee Number,
( b ) Name of the Principal,
( c ) The original Contract Dollar Amount,
( d ) The revised Contract Dollar Amount (if applicable),
( e ) The date of Contract completion, and
( f ) A summary specifying the fee amounts paid to SBA by the Surety and Principal, the fee amounts due to SBA as a result of any increases in the Contract amount, and the fee amounts to be refunded to the Principal or rebated to the Surety as a result of any decreases in the Contract amount.
[82 FR 39501, Aug. 21, 2017]
EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF AUDITORS TO INCORPORATE
                       FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INTO FORM S-8

<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-105598  on Form S-8 of the AJS Bancorp,  Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan and the
AJS  Bancorp,  Inc.  2003  Recognition  and  Retention  Plan of our report dated
February 17, 2006  appearing in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K of AJS Bancorp,
Inc.

                                        /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
                                            Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Oak Brook, Illinois
March 24, 2006
§ 107.760 How a change in size or activity of a Portfolio Concern affects the Licensee and the Portfolio Concern. ( a ) *Effect on Licensee of a change in size of a Portfolio Concern.* If a Portfolio Concern no longer qualifies as a Small Business you may keep your investment in the concern and: ( 1 ) Subject to the overline limitations of § 107.740, you may provide additional Financing to the concern up to the time it makes a public offering of its securities.
( 2 ) Even after the concern makes a public offering, you may exercise any stock options, warrants, or other rights to purchase Equity Securities which you acquired before the public offering, or fund Commitments you made before the public offering.
( b ) *Effect of a change in business activity occurring within one year of Licensee's initial Financing* — ( 1 ) *Retention of Investment.* Unless you receive SBA's written approval, you may not keep your investment in a Portfolio Concern, small or otherwise, which becomes ineligible by reason of a change in its business activity within one year of your initial investment.
( 2 ) *Request for SBA's approval to retain investment.* If you request that SBA approve the retention of your investment, your request must include sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the change in business activity was caused by an unforeseen change in circumstances and was not contemplated at the time the Financing was made.
( 3 ) *Additional Financing.* If SBA approves your request to retain an investment under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, you may provide additional Financing to the Portfolio Concern to the extent necessary to protect against the loss of the amount of your original investment, subject to the overline limitations of § 107.740.
( c ) *Effect of a change in business activity occurring more than one year after the initial Financing.* If a Portfolio Concern becomes ineligible because of a change in business activity more than one year after your initial Financing you may: ( 1 ) Retain your investment; and
( 2 ) Provide additional Financing to the Portfolio Concern to the extent necessary to protect against the loss of the amount of your original investment, subject to the overline limitations of § 107.740.
#### Louis Shegda et al., Respondents, v. Village of Lancaster, Appellant.

Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: There is nothing in this ordinance which specifically prohibits a “ convalescent home ” in a residential zone. There is insufficient evidence in the record upon which to base a determination as to whether the contemplated use of the property comes into conflict with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Lancaster. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiffs in an injunction action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4785 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.4785

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two

                                 An Act

 
 To extend by 19 days the authorization for the special assessment for 
                 the Domestic Trafficking Victims' Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR 
DOMESTIC TRAFFICKING VICTIMS' FUND.
    Section 3014(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended, in the 
matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``September 11'' and 
inserting ``September 30''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Kansas� forest resources in...**
 
2001 | 2002| 2003 | 2004| 2005 | 2006| 2007 | 2008| 2009
2010 | 2011 | 2012
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.163/16:
Item Number:0084-N-16 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000577051
 
February 20, 2020