alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION



I, Dale E. Parker, Chief Financial Officer of Paperweight Development Corp., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Paperweight Development Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 24, 2005



|           |  |                        
|---------- |  | -----------------------
|Signature: |  | /S/ DALE E. PARKER     
|           |  | Dale E. Parker         
|           |  | Chief Financial Officer
### §542. Assistant United States attorneys

(a) The Attorney General may appoint one or more assistant United States attorneys in any district when the public interest so requires.

(b) Each assistant United States attorney is subject to removal by the Attorney General.

(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(c), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 618.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (a) | 28 U.S.C. 502. | [None]. |
| (b) | 28 U.S.C. 504(b) (2d sentence, as applicable to assistant United States attorneys). | [None]. |

Statutes at Large

In subsection (b), the word "is" is substituted for "shall be".

#### 1948 Act

Prior section 502.—Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§483, 594 (May 28, 1896, ch. 252, §8, 29 Stat. 181; July 19, 1919, ch. 24, §1, 41 Stat. 209; Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 295, 42 Stat. 1560; June 25, 1936, ch. 804, 49 Stat. 1921).

Section consolidates sections 483 and 594 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to appointment of assistant United States attorneys.

Words "United States attorneys" were substituted for "district attorneys." (See reviser's note under section 501 [now 541] of this title.)

The exception of Alaska from the operation of such section 483 was omitted as covered by section 109 of title 48, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Territories and Insular Possessions, authorizing appointment of assistant United States attorneys in Alaska.

Reference in such section 483 to "District of Columbia" was omitted. (See reviser's note under section 501 [now 541] of this title.)

The provisions of sections 483 and 594 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., requiring the judges and United States attorneys to certify or evidence in writing the necessity for assistant United States attorneys in their respective districts, and specifying that such opinion of the judge shall state to the Attorney General the facts as distinguished from conclusions, showing the necessity therefor, were omitted. The Attorney General, as chief law enforcement officer, is in a better position to determine such necessity.

The salary provisions of such section 594 were omitted as covered by section 508 [now 548] of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 542, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 911, related to appointment and tenure of deputies and assistants for United States marshals, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), and reenactment in section 562 of this title by section 4(c) of Pub. L. 89–554.
----

----

I Informacija

Komisija

----

Euro kursas (1)

2005 m. lapkričio 22 d.

(2005/C 290/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Šaltinis: valiutų perskaičiavimo kursai paskelbti ECB.

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-22694-CIV-WILLIAMS/TORRES

ROBERTO PAGUAGA,

 

Plaintiff,

vs. 

PINNACLE ONE PRICE DRY CLEANING OF DAVIE, LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

___________________________________________________/ 

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Edwin G. 

Torres’s report and recommendation (“the Report”) (DE 60) regarding the motion for 

partial summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Roberto Paguaga (DE 41) and the motion for 

leave to file a sur-reply filed by Defendants Pinnacle One Price Dry Cleaning of Davie, 

LLC, Eric Draudt, and Galina Draudt (“Defendants”). (DE 57.) Defendants did not file any 

objections to the Report on or before the June 29, 2021 deadline. (See DE 60.)

Given the lack of objections here, and upon an independent review of the Report, 

the record, and applicable case law, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment (DE 41) is DENIED. 

2. Defendants’ motion for leave to file a sur-reply to Plaintiff’s reply to the motion for 

partial summary judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida on this 1st day of July, 

2021.
§ 312.5 Regional Innovation Strategies Program definitions. In addition to the defined terms set forth in subpart A of this part, the following term applies specifically to the RIS Program: *Institution of higher education* means: ( 1 ) An educational institution in any State that— ( i ) Admits as regular students only persons having a certificate of graduation from a school providing secondary education, or the recognized equivalent of such a certificate, or persons who meet the requirements of 20 U.S.C. 1091(d);
( ii ) Is legally authorized within such State to provide a program of education beyond secondary education;
( iii ) Provides an educational program for which the institution awards a bachelor's degree or provides not less than a 2-year program that is acceptable for full credit toward such a degree, or awards a degree that is acceptable for admission to a graduate or professional degree program, subject to review and approval by the Secretary of Education; and
( iv ) Is accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or association, or if not so accredited, is an institution that has been granted preaccreditation status by such an agency or association that has been recognized by the Secretary of Education for the granting of preaccreditation status, and the Secretary of Education has determined that there is satisfactory assurance that the institution will meet the accreditation standards of such an agency or association within a reasonable time.
( 2 ) *Additional institutions included.* For purposes of this subpart, the term *Institution of higher education* also includes— ( i ) Any school that provides not less than a 1-year program of training to prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation and that meets the provisions of paragraphs (1)(i), (ii), and (iv) of this definition; and
( ii ) An educational institution in any State that, in lieu of the requirement in paragraph (1)(i) of this definition, admits as regular students individuals— ( A ) Who are beyond the age of compulsory school attendance in the State in which the institution is located; or
( B ) Who will be dually or concurrently enrolled in the institution and a secondary school.
Exhibit
32(a)





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rocky Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mike
Brooks, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Mike BrooksMike
      Brooks, Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerMay 4,
      2009
### PART I—ESTABLISHMENT AND BENEFITS

Sec.
9702.
Establishment of the United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund.
9703.
Plan benefits.
SERVED JULY 26, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS · 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

DANIEL JOHNATHAN STERLING 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0779 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

ZGil 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011EA030050) has been assigned 

to Administrative La'Y Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

· persons on the attached Service List. 

onnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative L 

Attachment - Service List 

'' 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 . 

Daniel Johnathan Sterling, Respondent 

140 Jamison Lane 

Monroeville, P A 15146 

TEL: 909-732-1332 

Leonid Talisman, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3403 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E,,(E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0775 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

.. 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS63541 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Cedar Mountain Distributors,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Brenda Hall, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Brenda Hall
-----------------------
Brenda Hall
CEO and CFO
March 30, 2005
CERTIFICATION

I, John P. Elmensdorp, declare that:

1. I have reviewed the facts and allegations of the complaint against Carnival 

Corporation and Carnival plc, among others, and authorize its filing. 

2. I did not purchase and/or acquire the security that is the subject of this action at the 

direction of my counsel nor in order to participate in any private action under the federal securities 

laws.

3. I am willing to serve as a representative party on behalf of the class, including 

giving testimony at deposition and trial, if necessary. I understand that this is not a claim form, 

and that my ability to share in any recovery as a member of the class is not dependent upon 

execution of this Certification.

4. My Class Period purchase and sale transaction(s) in the relevant securities that are 

the subject of this action are attached in Schedule A. I have complete authority to bring a suit to 

recover for investment losses for all securities set forth in Schedule A.

5. During the three years prior to the date of this Certification, I have not sought to 

serve nor served as a representative party for a class in an action filed under the federal securities 

laws.

6. I will not accept any payment for serving as a representative party on behalf of the 

class beyond my pro rata share of any recovery, except such reasonable costs and expenses 

(including lost wages) directly relating to the representation of the class as ordered or approved by 

the Court.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on: 

John P. Elmensdorp

6/2/2020

Case 1:20-cv-22319-KMM Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2020 Page 1 of 2
Security Buy/Sell Date Quantity Price

Common Stock (Ticker: CCL) Buy 2/27/2020 752 $33.2378

Common Stock (Ticker: CCL) Buy 2/27/2020 1,495 $33.3900

SCHEDULE A

Case 1:20-cv-22319-KMM Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### § 4710.2 Inventory and monitoring.

The authorized officer shall maintain a record of the herd areas that existed in 1971, and a current inventory of the numbers of animals and their areas of use. When herd management areas are established, the authorized officer shall also inventory and monitor herd and habitat characteristics.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6613

JULIAN E. ROCHESTER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-146-2-21AJ) Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Julian E. Rochester, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Rochester v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corrections , No. CA-98-146-2- 21AJ (D.S.C. Apr. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motions for preparation of a transcript at government expense and for correction of facts in PLRA are denied.

DISMISSED
No: 23-057 September 6, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Makes Available Summer’s Subsequent License Renewal Application

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received a subsequent license renewal 

application from Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., which requests an additional 20 years of 

operation for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station. The application to renew the plant license 

from 60 to 80 years is now available for public inspection on the NRC website. 

Dominion filed an application August 18 seeking to renew the plant’s license for a 

second time. Summer is a pressurized-water reactor in Jenkinsville, South Carolina, 

approximately 26 miles northwest of Columbia. The NRC approved in April 2004 the first 

renewal to extend the licensing term from 40 to 60 years. The reactor currently is licensed to 

operate through Aug. 6, 2042. 

The NRC staff is reviewing the application to determine if it has sufficient information to 

begin detailed safety and environmental reviews. Once the determination is made, the staff will

then docket it and publish a notice of opportunity to request an adjudicatory hearing before the 

NRC’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board.
§ 128.408 What is the process for such an appeal? ( a ) *Notice of appeal.* When the contracting officer rejects a recommendation by SBA's Procurement Center Representative to make a requirement available for award as an SDVOSB contract, the contracting officer must notify the Procurement Center Representative as soon as practicable. If the SBA Administrator intends to appeal the decision, SBA must notify the contracting officer no later than five business days after receiving notice of the contracting officer's decision.
( b ) *Suspension of action.* Upon receipt of notice of SBA's intent to appeal, the contracting officer must suspend further action regarding the procurement until the Secretary of the department or head of the agency issues a written decision on the appeal, unless the Secretary of the department or head of the agency makes a written determination that urgent and compelling circumstances which significantly affect the interests of the United States compel award of the contract.
( c ) *Deadline for appeal.* Within 15 business days of SBA's notification to the contracting officer, SBA must file its formal appeal with the Secretary of the department or head of the agency, or the appeal will be deemed withdrawn.
( d ) *Decision.* The Secretary of the department or head of the agency must specify in writing the reasons for a denial of an appeal brought under this section.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA study of the sensitivity of an imaging telescope (GRITS) for high energy gamma-ray astronomyWhen a gamma-ray telescope is placed in Earth orbit, it is bombarded by a flux of cosmic protons much greater than the flux of interesting gammas. These protons can interact in the telescope's thermal shielding to produce detectable gamma rays, most of which are vetoed. Since the proton flux is so high, the unvetoed gamma rays constitute a significant background relative to some weak sources. This background increases the observing time required to pinpoint some sources and entirely obscures other sources. Although recent telescopes have been designed to minimize this background, its strength and spectral characteristics were not previously calculated in detail. Monte Carlo calculations are presented which characterize the strength, spectrum and other features of the cosmic proton background using FLUKA, a hadronic cascade program. Several gamma-ray telescopes, including SAS-2, EGRET and the Gamma Ray Imaging Telescope System (GRITS), are analyzed, and their proton-induced backgrounds are characterized. In all cases, the backgrounds are either shown to be low relative to interesting signals or suggestions are made which would reduce the background sufficiently to leave the telescope unimpaired. In addition, several limiting cases are examined for comparison to previous estimates and calibration measurements.Document ID19900019152Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsYearian, Mason R.*(Stanford Univ. CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1990Subject CategoryAstronomyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186921NASA-CR-186921Accession Number90N28468Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG8-752Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900019152.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.451 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT A

Case 0:20-cv-61099-RKA Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2020 Page 1 of 4
Case 0:20-cv-61099-RKA Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2020 Page 2 of 4
Case 0:20-cv-61099-RKA Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2020 Page 3 of 4
Case 0:20-cv-61099-RKA Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2020 Page 4 of 4