alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>                                               EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Kevin Perry, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation ("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant,
certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

	  a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

  b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

  c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and



<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:  November 15, 2004    /s/ Kevin Perry
                                Kevin Perry
                                Chief Financial Officer,
                                Demeter Management Corporation,
                                general partner of the registrant
#### Rose Augenblick v. David Israel and Katie Israel.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Order entered September 8, 2016

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 01408

- CR

DONAVIN JOCOLYN JENN INGS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from th e 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366

- 81858

- 2014



### O RDER

Appellant’s September 6, 2016 motion to file late his first amended original brief is

GRANTED . Appellant’s first amended original brief received by the Clerk of the Court on

September 6, 2016 is DEEMED timely filed on the date of this order.

The State’s brief shall be due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
Case 1:20-cv-21226-RKA Document 154 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2022 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:20-cv-21226-RKA Document 154 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2022 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:20-cv-21226-RKA Document 154 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2022 Page 3 of 3
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Auditors**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form SB-2 (No. 333-68884), Form S-8 (No. 333-75344) and Form S-8 (No. 333-97435) of MedicalCV, Inc. of our report dated June 6, 2003, except as to Note16 for which the date is July 8, 2003, relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-KSB.

 

 
| /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP            |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota                |
| July 29, 2003                    |

 

----
§ 113.445 Marital or parental status. ( a ) *Status generally.* A recipient shall not apply any rule concerning a student's actual or potential parental, family, or marital status that treats students differently on the basis of sex.
( b ) *Pregnancy and related conditions.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall not discriminate against any student, or exclude any student from its education program or activity, including any class or extracurricular activity, on the basis of such student's pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom, unless the student requests voluntarily to participate in a separate portion of the program or activity of the recipient.
( 2 ) A recipient may require such a student to obtain the certification of a physician that the student is physically and emotionally able to continue participation as long as such a certification is required of all students for other physical or emotional conditions requiring the attention of a physician.
( 3 ) A recipient that operates a portion of its education program or activity separately for pregnant students, admittance to which is completely voluntary on the part of the student as provided in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, shall ensure that the separate portion is comparable to that offered to non-pregnant students.
( 4 ) Subject to § 113.235(d), a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy and recovery therefrom in the same manner and under the same policies as any other temporary disability with respect to any medical or hospital benefit, service, plan, or policy that such recipient administers, operates, offers, or participates in with respect to students admitted to the recipient's educational program or activity.
( 5 ) In the case of a recipient that does not maintain a leave policy for its students, or in the case of a student who does not otherwise qualify for leave under such a policy, a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, and recovery therefrom as a justification for a leave of absence for as long a period of time as is deemed medically necessary by the student's physician, at the conclusion of which the student shall be reinstated to the status that she held when the leave began.
### §463. Expenses of litigation

Whenever a Chief Justice, justice, judge, officer, or employee of any United States court is sued in his official capacity, or is otherwise required to defend acts taken or omissions made in his official capacity, and the services of an attorney for the Government are not reasonably available pursuant to chapter 31 of this title, the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts may pay the costs of his defense. The Director shall prescribe regulations for such payments subject to the approval of the Judicial Conference of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §116(a), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 32.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as an Effective Date of 1982 Amendment note under section 171 of this title.
J.

J.

MIMMIRM :WitZMICIENASS is reasonably susceptible to more than one interpretation" (internal quotations omitted)). Further, to the extent that the transcript attached to the divorce decree was inconsistent with the unambiguous terms of the decree, the district court properly declined to consider the transcript to interpret the provision. 1 See Kishner v. Kishner, 93 Nev. 220, 225, 562 P.2d 493, 496 (1977) (noting that the district court may not construe a decree that is not ambiguous). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.



### ett.AA. Parraguirre 

# C 6 4 1
. Cherry cc: Hon. Charles J. Hoskin, District Judge, Family Court Division Lansford W. Levitt, Settlement Judge Mills & Mills Renee Schmidt Eighth District Court Clerk 'We decline to consider appellant's argument that the transcript was incorporated into the divorce decree pursuant to NRS 123.080, as appellant failed to raise that argument before the district court. See State Bd. of Equalization v. Barta, 124 Nev. 612, 621, 188 P.3d 1092, 1098 (2008) (providing that "this court generally will not consider arguments that a party raises for the first time on appeal").

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
§ 304.1 Designation of Economic Development Districts: Regional eligibility. Upon the request of a District Organization (as defined in § 304.2), EDA may designate a Region as an Economic Development District if such Region: ( a ) Contains at least one geographic area that is subject to the economic distress criteria set forth in § 301.3(a)(1) of this chapter and is identified in an approved CEDS;
( b ) Is of sufficient size or population and contains sufficient resources to foster economic development on a scale involving more than a single geographic area subject to the economic distress criteria set forth in § 301.3(a)(1) of this chapter;
( c ) Has an EDA-approved CEDS that: ( 1 ) Meets the requirements under § 303.7 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Contains a specific program for intra-District cooperation, self-help, and public investment; and
( 3 ) Is approved by each affected State and by the Assistant Secretary;
( d ) Obtains commitments from at least a majority of the counties or other areas within the proposed District, as determined by EDA, to support the economic development activities of the District; and
( e ) Obtains the concurrence with the designation request from the State (or States) in which the proposed District will be wholly or partially located.
[71 FR 56675, Sept. 27, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 76131, Dec. 19, 2014]
§ 204.43 Ineligible costs. Costs not directly associated with the incident period are ineligible. Ineligible costs include the following: ( a ) Costs incurred in the mitigation, management, and control of undeclared fires;
( b ) Costs related to planning, pre-suppression (*i.e.,* cutting fire-breaks without the presence of an imminent threat, training, road widening, and other similar activities), and recovery (*i.e.,* land rehabilitation activities, such as seeding, planting operations, and erosion control, or the salvage of timber and other materials, and restoration of facilities damaged by fire);
( c ) Costs for the straight or regular time salaries and benefits of a subrecipient's permanently employed or reassigned personnel;
( d ) Costs for mitigation, management, and control of a declared fire on co-mingled Federal land when such costs are reimbursable to the State by a Federal agency under another statute (See 44 CFR part 51);
( e ) Fires fought on Federal land are generally the responsibility of the Federal Agency that owns or manages the land. Costs incurred while fighting fires on federally owned land are not eligible under the Fire Management Assistance Grant Program except as noted in § 204.42(i).
[66 FR 57347, Nov. 14, 2001, as amended at 82 FR 42, Jan. 3, 2017]
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.1306 What are the service and filing requirements?

The provisions of § 134.204 apply to the service and filing of all pleadings and other submissions permitted under this subpart, unless otherwise indicated in this subpart.
### [§2076. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–702, title IV, §401(c), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4650]

Section, added Pub. L. 93–595, §2(a)(1), Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1948; amended Pub. L. 94–149, §2, Dec. 12, 1975, 89 Stat. 806, authorized the Supreme Court to prescribe amendments to Federal Rules of Evidence. See sections 2072 to 2074 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 1, 1988, see section 407 of Pub. L. 100–702, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 2071 of this title.
#### § 130.830 Audits and investigations.

See 2 CFR part 200, subpart F.

[88 FR 76652, Nov. 7, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-27-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                  DEC-29-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-27-1998 
<CASH>                          448,011     
<SECURITIES>                    0           
<RECEIVABLES>                   454,811     
<ALLOWANCES>                    0           
<INVENTORY>                     356,744     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,480,148   
<PP&E>                          13,393,863  
<DEPRECIATION>                  5,042,734   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  11,934,134  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           4,159,108
<BONDS>                         2,221,646
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     2
<COMMON>                        160
<OTHER-SE>                      5,284,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    11,934,134
<SALES>                         25,094,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                25,452,959
<CGS>                           6,950,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   6,950,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                18,340,453
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              138,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 24,124
<INCOME-TAX>                    3,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             101,908
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    101,908
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .01
        


</TABLE>
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Southern District of Florida

MEGAN FRASER

1:20-cv-22479-UU

ENVIRONMENTAL TRACING, LLC, 

a Florida Profit Corporation 

ENVIRONMENTAL TRACING, LLC 

c/o Registered Agent 

Corporation Service Company 

1201 Hays Street 

Tallahassee, FL 32301 

 CHARLES M. EISS, Esquire 

 Law Offices of Charles Eiss, P.L. 

 7951 SW 6th Street, Suite 112 

 Plantation, FL 33324

06/16/2020 s/ C.Davis

Case 1:20-cv-22479-UU Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2020 Page 1 of 1
3 Five Studios 422 The Dirt Road Midway, Georgia 31320

October 18,2015

US Department ofTransportation Docket ManagementSystem 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington DC 20590
RE: Exemption Request Section 333 of FAA Reform Act and Part 11 ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations
Dear Sir or Ma'am: Pursuantto section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012, 3 Five Studiosseeks and exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations detailed belowto allow commercial Unmanned Aerial Systems ("UAS11 ) operations for photography, videography, mapping, inspections, and data collection services. Application Information Jason Baker 3 Five Studios 422 The Dirt Road Midway, Georgia 31320 3 Five Studios will use the following unmanned aircraft ("UA")foraerial photography, videography, mapping, inspectionsand data collection services. The UAare widely used inthe aerial photography and mapping industryand have been approved inthe listed exemptions:
11062 Astraeus Aerial: 11109 Clayco, Inc.: 11112 VDOS Global LLC: Aircraftand EQuipment: DJI Phantom 3 Pro DJIInspire Tarot 650 Tarot900 Walkera QR X350 Docket No. FAA2014-0352 Docket No. FAA2014.0507 Docket No. FAA2014-0382

### ·~· Regulations from which exemption is requested: 14 CFR 45.23 (b) Aircraft markings 14 CFR 21 (h) Certification procedures; Airworthiness Certificates 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b) Pilots, Flight Instructor and Ground Instructors 91.7(a) Airworthiness certificate 91.9(b)(2) Aircraftflight manual 91.103 Preflight actions 91.109 Flight instructions 91.119 Minimum safe altitudes 91.151(a) Fuel requirements forflights VFR conditions 91.203 (a)&(b) Aircraft certifications and registrations 91.405 Operations after Maintenance 91.409(a)(1)&(2) Inspections 91.417(a)&(b) Maintenance records 3 Five Studios understands the Conditions and Limitations that are likely to be included with the approved requestforexemption and we are prepared to fully comply with them.

3 Five Studios is committed to operating UA safely. Flight operation will be conducted in accordance withthe approved conditions and limitations from the FAA. Specifically, flight operations with be performed within line ofsight with a Pilot in Command (PIC) and avisual observer (VO). Flight operations will take place under 400' AGL. Safety and operational guidelines from DJI, Tarot and Walkera will be followed for every flight. The safety systems built intothese platforms allows for return to launch technology with GPS ifflight control signal lost. 

### Public Interest The collection ofaerial photograph and data is currently obtained by the use of manned aircraft. The use of UAS technology benefits the public by reducing the risk due to manned aircraft accidents. Additionally, UAS platforms reduce the environmental impact such as the absence ofcombustible fuels and the reduction ofexhaust emissions and noise.

Thank you foryour consideration 3 Five Studios exemption request. Please contact us ifyou have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,

/

### ~_)(_

# _____..,

. '.... Jason Baker 3 Five Studios
#### In the Matter of Harry Sullivan, Appellant-Respondent, against Lewis J. Valentine, as Commissioner of Police of the City of New York and as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund, et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.920 Required participation by the Third Party Lender. ( a ) *Amount of Third Party Loans.* A Project financing must include one or more Third Party Loans totaling at least as much as the 504 loan. However, the Third Party Loans must total at least 50 percent of the total cost of the Project if: ( 1 ) The Borrower (or Operating Company, if the Borrower is an Eligible Passive Company) has operated for two years or less, or
( 2 ) The Project is for the acquisition, construction, conversion or expansion of a limited or single purpose asset.
( b ) *Third party loan collateral.* The 504 loan is usually collateralized by a second lien on Project Property. The Third Party Lender may obtain additional collateral or other security for the Third Party Loan (“Additional Collateral”) only if in the event of liquidation and unless otherwise approved in writing by SBA: ( 1 ) The Third Party Lender liquidates or otherwise exhausts all reasonable avenues of collection with respect to the Additional Collateral no later than the disposition of the Project Property, and
( 2 ) The Third Party Lender applies any proceeds received as a result of the Additional Collateral to the balance outstanding on the Third Party Loan prior to the application of proceeds from the disposition of the Project Property to the Third Party Loan.
[64 FR 2118, Jan. 13, 1999, as amended at 79 FR 15650, Mar. 21, 2014]
119 STAT. 230 PUBLIC LAW 109–12—MAY 5, 2005

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 20:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Apr. 19, considered and passed House.

Apr. 28, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–12

109th Congress

Joint Resolution

Providing for the appointment of Robert P. Kogod as a citizen regent of the Board

of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance

with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States

(20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress,

occurring by reason of the expiration of the term of Wesley S.

Williams, Jr. of the District of Columbia, on April 13, 2005, is

filled by the appointment of Robert P. Kogod of the District of

Columbia. The appointment is for a term of 6 years, beginning

on the later of April 14, 2005, or the date of the enactment of

this joint resolution.

Approved May 5, 2005.

Effective date.

May 5, 2005

[H.J. Res. 20]
#### J. Walter Thompson, as Limited Administrator of the Estate of Lillian M. Thompson, Deceased, Respondent, v. Harry S. Davega et al., Doing Business under the Name of White Turkey Town House, Appellants.

Action for wrongful death. Order denying defendants’ motion for a change of venue from Richmond County to Westchester or Rassau County, under subdivision 2 of section 187 of the Civil Practice Act, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Ro opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Integrated Surgical
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ramesh C. Trivedi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Ramesh C. Trivedi
------------------------------------------

Ramesh C. Trivedi, Chief Executive Officer

April 13, 2007
#### McCoy *v.*Moore & Floyd.

December 15, 1910.

Atkinson, J.

The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. There was no error in the rulings of the court on the admissibility of evidence, nor in the instructions to the jury, sufficient to require the grant of a new trial for any reason assigned.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*522Complaint. Before Judge Kimsey. Rabun superior court. November 15, 1909.

*J. O. E'd/mards*and *J. B. Jones,*for plaintiff in error.

W. *S. Paris*and *Joseph V. Davis,*contra.