alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 33

**Question 33:** What is the dose limit for visitors entering a restricted area (e.g., visitors to a hospital, patients' relatives, escorted tourists)?

**Answer:** Occupational dose limits apply to all individuals who enter a "restricted area." This is also the case under the old Part 20. "Visitors to a hospital, patients' relatives, escorted tourists" who do not enter a restricted area are not subject to the occupational dose limits. Therefore, there is a need to clearly designate the particular areas in a hospital that are "restricted areas."

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1201)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 24, 2017
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3978 — Oracle/Siebel)

(2006/C 18/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
#### SMART *v.*VALENCIA

No. 2728

(See 49 Nev. 411)

December 7, 1926.

On Petition for Rehearing

Per *Curiam:*

Rehearing denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 18, 2009 

p1215 

Order 

 

December 18, 2009 

140106 

In re LEAH MARIE KRESUK and 

RACHEL ANNE KRESUCK, Minors. _________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 140106 

 COA: 292504 

Oakland Cir Ct Fam Div: 09-756736-NA 

LEO KRESUK, JR., 

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 10, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.652 FTA fees.

The FTA may charge reasonable servicing fees, transfer fees, and other fees as the SBA and FTA may negotiate under contract.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

No. III-00-11 February 7, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois, have announced the assignment of

Paul Krohn as the agency’s Resident Inspector at the LaSalle Nuclear Power Plant in Marseilles,

Illinois.

Krohn, a NRC employee since 1996, began his duties at the plant in August. Before his recent

assignment, Krohn was the Resident Inspector at the Prairie Island Nuclear Power Plant in Welch,

Minnesota. Prior to joining the NRC, he worked for Lockheed Martin Inc. as a non-destructive testing

development engineer at Knolls Atomic Nuclear Power Laboratory in Schenectady, N.Y. He also was a

shift supervisor and nuclear plant engineer for General Electric at the U.S. Naval Nuclear Submarine

Prototype Power Plant in West Milton, N.Y.

Krohn earned a bachelor’s degree in marine engineering from the State University of New

York’s Maritime College, and a master’s in mechanical engineering from the University of Michigan.

He also has a professional engineers license from the state of New York.

Krohn, his wife Mary, and two children live in Aurora, Illinois.

Krohn joins Senior Resident Inspector Eric Duncan at LaSalle. They can be reached at the plant

at (815) 357-8611.

#####
```

[109th Congress Public Law 31]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ031.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 374]]

Public Law 109-31
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  12433 Antioch Road in Overland Park, Kansas, as the ``Ed Eilert Post 
       Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 12, 2005 -  [H.R. 1524]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 12433 
Antioch Road in Overland Park, Kansas, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Ed Eilert Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ed Eilert Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved July 12, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1524:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Apr. 26, considered and passed House.
            June 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1

LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-157029 and No. 333-84304) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-64346, No. 333-134583,
and No. 333-139968) on Form S-8 of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 27, 2009, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, which
appear in the Annual Report to shareholders, included in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hampton Roads Bankshares Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|LOGO                               
|Winchester, Virginia March 27, 2009
v.o

1o\tJ l A l>JoLl)

Speeding 

Kills Bears 

(And Other Wildlife!) 

Black bears are one of the 

most iconic and beloved 

animals in Yosemite. 

Unfortunately, for bears, 

living here comes with 

some serious drawbacks. 

One of those is that four 

million visitors each year 

means millions of cars on 

Yosemite's roads; many 

with distracted drivers, 

folks who are not familiar 

with the area, or folks who 

are excited to get where 

they are going. More than 

400 bears have been hit 

by cars in Yosemite since 

1995-and often, 

collisions with vehicles are 

fata I to bears. 

It is not just bears who face 

danger on Yosemite's 

roads: owls, Pacific 

fishers, butterflies, rare 

amphibians like frogs 

and salamanders; and 

mammals like deer, foxes, 

and mountain lions are 

also often hit and killed on 

Yosemite's roads. 

If you want to help save 

wildlife, stay alert! Scan the 

sides of the road in front of 

your car and obey posted 

speed limits. Talk to your 

friends about why it is 

important to drive slowly 

and pay attention while 

driving on the roads in 

Yosemite!
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 508.78

 508.88

 508.71

 508.95

 508.30

 508.27

 508.09

 508.01

 508.08

 508.11

 508.30

 508.98

 508.32

 508.33

 508.43

 508.87

 508.86

 508.64

 508.61

 508.42

 508.32

 508.39

 508.31

 508.08

 508.74

 508.62

 508.60

 508.19

 508.17

 508.29

 508.35

 65,449

 65,572

 65,363

 65,658

 64,858

 64,821

 64,600

 64,501

 64,587

 64,624

 64,858

 65,695

 64,883

 64,895

 65,018

 65,560

 65,548

 65,277

 65,240

 65,006

 64,883

 64,969

 64,871

 64,587

 65,400

 65,252

 65,228

 64,723

 64,698

 64,846

 64,920

STORAGE

+49

+123

-209

+295

-800

-37

-221

-99

+86

+37

+234

+837

-812

+12

+123

+542

-12

-271

-37

-234

-123

+86

-98

-284

+813

-148

-24

-505

-25

+148

+74

CHANGE

1,973

2,001

1,974

2,201

1,640

2,023

1,939

2,005

2,105

2,175

2,363

2,692

1,871

2,276

2,287

2,435

2,153

1,993

2,109

2,006

2,066

2,167

2,064

1,932

2,456

1,916

1,986

1,768

2,019

2,100

1,960

INFLOW

 1,780

 1,780

 1,777

 1,774

 1,779

 1,769

 1,773

 1,772

 1,775

 1,773

 1,771

 1,776

 1,777

 1,783

 1,774

 1,774

 1,777

 1,776

 1,776

 1,775

 1,776

 1,775

 1,771

 1,776

 1,776

 1,778

 1,780

 1,780

 1,782

 1,781

 1,778

POWER

 50

 0

 88

 199

 201

 200

 198

 198

 199

 265

 354

 398

 411

 396

 398

 333

 302

 268

 251

 249

 250

 249

 250

 216

 199

 156

 100

 99

 99

 100

 0

SPILL

 102

 142

 197

 60

 45

 57

 61

 70

 72

 100

 102

 78

 73

 73

 35

 37

 62

 69

 84

 83

 85

 88

 80

 67

 55

 40

 102

 128

 138

 130

 130

OUTLET

 16

 17

 17

 19

 18

 16

 18

 15

 16

 18

 18

 18

 19

 18

 18

 18

 18

 17

 17

 17

 17

 12

 12

 16

 16

 17

 16

 16

 13

 14

 15

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2002 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 08/20/2002

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -480 64,655 55,064 6,676 2,645 512

ACRE-FEET -480 128,243 109,219 13,242 5,246 1,016

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 109,219

SPILL 13,242 127,707

 65,400

OUTLET 5,246

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,926

 2,011

 1,971

 2,215

 1,599

 2,053

 1,966

 2,037

 2,112

 2,203

 2,356

 2,786

 1,780

 2,269

 2,217

 2,426

 2,139

 1,985

 2,175

 2,002

 1,978

 2,182

 2,175

 1,925

 2,469

 1,921

 2,062

 1,994

 2,051

 1,416

 2,104

 64,505

 127,946

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0721 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM076AD

601R-25 - 187, RA --- 9/1/11 601R-25 - 187 --- 7/21/11 601R-25 - 198 --- 9/1/11 601R-25 - 199 --- 9/1/11 COMTEK COMSB - 25 - 52 - 001. RA --- 12/29/11 SECONDARY SBS: C&D ZODIAK B301002 - 25 - 01 --- 4/19/11 C&D ZODIAK B301002 - 25 - 02, R1 --- 6/16/11 C&D ZODIAK B301003 - 25 - 01 --- 4/19/11 C&D ZODIAK B301003 - 25 - 02, R1 --- 8/31/11 C&D ZODIAK 4652005 - 25 - 01 --- 3/10/11

Name/D escription of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket

### MA

**Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
§ 3836.11 What are the general requirements for performing assessment work? ( a ) Beginning in the assessment year that begins after you locate your mining claim, you must expend $100 in labor or improvements for each claim for each assessment year preceding the date on which you file for a small miner waiver.
( b ) You may perform assessment work on: ( 1 ) Each individual claim;
( 2 ) One or more claims in a group of contiguous lode or placer claims that you own or hold an interest in and that cover the same mineral deposit; or
( 3 ) Adjacent or nearby lands if the work supports development of the minerals on the claim(s).
( c ) Your total expenditure must equal at least $100 per claim.
Exhibit 32.1 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diametrics Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thequarter ended June 301, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Heng Chuk, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
+ OMS 

02/03/2010 1B: 14 FAX, 2024935~42A A Ktl:i lUNA( ~~UNSEl, AEA-r .- _.- --_.NO, 0851-P. 2/2~___•__ ;i1'\1~,.o,.(IJ Iv \~, 14rNl • 

u.s, DcIpanment Eastern R.egion 	 1 Aviaton Plaza - Room 561 

01 Transport:dion Regional Counsel 	 Jamaiea, NY 11434 . 

Telephone: 118 .553-3276 

Federall\v"Jation Facsimile: 718 9:;l5-5S99

Administration 

January 29~ 2010 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benk:in 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M·20 

U.S. Depa11:ment of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.B. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: FAA '\t. Prospect AViation Corp. 


Docket No. CP09EA0022 


Dear Judge Benkin: 

This is to inform you the parties settled the above-referenced matter. ·Acco.tdingly, 

there is no longer a need for a hearing. If you have any questions~ please do not 

hesitate to contact nle. Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Sincerely. 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By:. 

Attorney 

cc; 	 Gregory C. Taylor, President Prospect Aviation Corp. 

Layden C. Sadeck" Counsel 

Hearing Docket
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateAllegations

# Statistics on Allegations

For information about the allegations received and their disposition, select a category and click the associated button. Please note that "Discrimination Allegations Received" is a subset of "Allegations Received." ***Statistics, with data from the prior month, are updated by the 15th of the current month. Licensees are only listed if they received allegations under the selected category.***

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 15, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - What is an Allegation
          - Frequently Asked Questions
          - Allegations Annual Reports
          - Report a Safety or Security Concern
          - Statistics on Allegations
          - Safety Conscious Work Environment Policy Guidance
          - Public Meetings

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 15, 2024
EXHIBIT 32.2: CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
   1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

            In connection with the accompanying Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Magna-Lab, Inc. for the quarter and nine months ended November 30, 2006, the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

            (1)   such Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter and nine
                  months ended November 30, 2006 fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   the information contained in such Quarterly report on Form
                  10-QSB for the quarter and nine months ended November 30, 2006
                  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                  condition and results of operations of Magna-Lab, Inc.

January 10, 2007                         /s/ Kenneth C. Riscica
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name: Kenneth C. Riscica
                                         Title: Treasurer & Secretary (principal
                                         financial officer)
§ 44.54 What happens if a State repeals or amends distribution legislation? ( a ) If a State repeals or amends distribution legislation, the State must immediately notify the Department in writing of this fact and send the Department a copy of the new law.
( b ) When the Department receives a notification under paragraph (a) of this section, it must: ( 1 ) Determine if the State's process complies with 31 U.S.C. 6907. If the Department determines that it does not, we must notify the designated State government office that the Department will disburse payment directly to the eligible local governments; and
( 2 ) Start the payments: ( i ) In the current Federal fiscal year, if the Department receives a copy of the State's amendatory legislation before July 1; or
( ii ) Start the payments in the next Federal fiscal year, if the Department receives a copy of the State's amendatory legislation after July 1.
#### George BARTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jan ADRIAN, Chief, Military Star Contact Center, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-10566.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

George Bartz, Airway Heights, WA, pro se.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

George Bartz, Washington inmate # 985210, proceeding pro se, appeals from the dismissal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), of his claims against the defendant. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides that if service is not made within 120 days of filing the complaint, the action is subject to dismissal without prejudice by the district court after notice to the plaintiff, unless the plaintiff can show good cause for his failure to complete service. FedR.CivP. 4(m). This court reviews for an abuse of discretion a district court’s dismissal for failure to effect timely service. *See Systems Signs Supplies v. United States Dep’t of Justice,*903 F.2d 1011, 1013 (5th Cir.1990).

Bartz asserts that his failure to effect service of process should be excused because of his pro se status and because dismissal of his complaint violates his right to due process. Pro se status and ignorance of the relevant rules of service do not excuse a plaintiffs failure to effect service. *Kersh v. Derozier,*851 F.2d 1509, 1512 (5th Cir.1988). Additionally, the district court informed Bartz of the service of process requirements contained in Federal Rule-of Civil Procedure 4.

As for Bartz’s contention that the dismissal of his complaint violates his due process rights, the district court dismissed Bartz’s complaint without prejudice, and Bartz does not argue that a subsequent suit would be time-barred. Therefore, due process is not implicated.

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
118 STAT. 3896 PUBLIC LAW 108–472—DEC. 21, 2004

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4847:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Oct. 6, considered and passed House.

Dec. 7, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–472

108th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 560 Bay

Isles Road in Longboat Key, Florida, as the ‘‘Lieutenant General James V.

Edmundson Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

560 Bay Isles Road in Longboat Key, Florida, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Lieutenant General James V. Edmundson

Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lieutenant

General James V. Edmundson Post Office Building’’.

Approved December 21, 2004.

Dec. 21, 2004

[H.R. 4847]
Exhibit
32.2
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of **CHINA DIGITAL COMMUNICATION GROUP** (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,
Yao Miao, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
 
 Dated
this 21st day of
April, 2005.
 /s/
      Yao MiaoYao
      MiaoChief
      Financial Officer
§ 41.515 Compensation. A recipient shall not make or enforce any policy or practice that, on the basis of sex: ( a ) Makes distinctions in rates of pay or other compensation;
( b ) Results in the payment of wages to employees of one sex at a rate less than that paid to employees of the opposite sex for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and that are performed under similar working conditions.
No: II-23-028 September 23, 2023 

Contact: Dave Gasperson 404-997-4417 

NRC Approves Further Uranium Enrichment at American Centrifuge Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has authorized American Centrifuge Operating LLC to 

proceed with its planned demonstration project to produce high-assay low-enriched uranium, known 

as HALEU, under its contract with the Department of Energy. This is a major step in developing 

advanced fuels for the next generation of nuclear reactors. 

The authorization signed Sept. 21 allows the company to possess and use enough uranium to 

perform Phase 1 of the company’s contract with DOE, the production of 20 kilograms of HALEU. 

The company plans to enrich the uranium in its HALEU Demonstration Cascade module at the 

American Centrifuge Plant in Piketon, Ohio. HALEU is enriched up to 20 percent in the isotope 

U-235, higher than the typical 3-5 percent found in current nuclear reactor fuel. 

“This authorization follows a rigorous review of the American Centrifuge Plant’s safety 

features and operating procedures,” said NRC Region II Administrator Laura A. Dudes. “The NRC 

is committed to ensuring that all nuclear facilities operate safely and securely, and we will continue 

to closely monitor the HALEU Demonstration Cascade to ensure that it continues to meet our high 

safety standards.” 

The NRC in June authorized the company to possess a smaller amount of material as part of 

its project preparations. The company plans to initiate HALEU production in October and complete 

Phase 1 in December.

The amount of material and higher enrichment level authorized make the American 

Centrifuge Plant the first Category II fuel facility licensed by the NRC.

Details of the inspections and the latest authorization letter are available on the NRC 

website.
pd-0832-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 12/31/2015 10:31:32 AM

Accepted 12/31/2015 2:17:59 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK