alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James Otis FRIERSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 12289.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

June 9, 1955.

James O. Frierson, pro se.

George E. Woods, Asst. U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich. (Fred W. Kaess, U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MCALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a motion to vacate sentence entered by Chief Judge Lederle in the Eastern District of Michigan.

After changing his plea of guilty to that of not guilty, the defendant was tried and found guilty by verdict of a jury, and was sentenced by Judge Holtzoff to ten years’ imprisonment and to a fine of $250 on a one-count information charging the possession of marijuana cigarettes in violation of section 2593, Title 26, U.S.C.A. Appellant was convicted as a third offender on state court evidence, which he avers was obtained illegally.

 Upon the authority of our decision in Davilman v. United States, 6 Cir., 180 F.2d 284, wherein we held that a convict could not avail himself of section 2255, Title 28, U.S.C.A., to retry his case; and upon authority of the opinion of Mr. Justice Jackson in Irvine v. People of State of California, 347 U.S. 128, 134, 74 S.Ct. 381, 98 L.Ed. 561, wherein it was held that illegally seized evidence is admissible in federal court, unless a federal officer perpetrated the wrong;

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 213]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ213.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 726]]

Public Law 110-213
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
     424 Clay Avenue in Waco, Texas, as the ``Army PFC Juan Alonso 
Covarrubias <<NOTE: May 7, 2008 -  [H.R. 3720]>> Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ARMY PFC JUAN ALONSO COVARRUBIAS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 424 Clay Avenue in Waco, Texas, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Army PFC Juan Alonso Covarrubias Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Army PFC 
Juan Alonso Covarrubias Post Office Building''.

    Approved May 7, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3720:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Jan. 22, considered and passed House.
            Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
----

New national side of euro circulation coins

(2006/C 20/10)

Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (1) with a view to informing anyone required to handle coins in the course of their work and the public at large. In accordance with the Council conclusions of 8 December 2003 (2), Member States and countries that have concluded a Monetary Agreement with the Community providing for the issuance of euro circulation coins are allowed to issue certain quantities of commemorative euro circulation coins on condition that not more than one new coin design is issued per country per year and that only the 2 EUR denomination is used. These coins have the technical features of normal euro circulation coins, but bear a commemorative design on the obverse national side.

Issuing State: Luxembourg

Subject of commemoration: 25th birthday of the heir to the throne, The Grand-Duke Guillaume

Factual description of the design: The coin depicts on the left-hand side of the inner part the effigy of His Royal Highness, The Grand-Duke Henri looking to the right, superimposed on the effigy of the hereditary Grand-Duke Guillaume, on the right-hand side of the inner part. The date 2006 appears below both effigies, flanked by the letter ‘S’ and the logo of the Mint. The word ‘LËTZEBUERG’ appears above the effigies along the upper edge of the inner part of the coin. The 12 stars surround the design on the outer ring of the coin.

Issue volume: 1.1 million coins

Approximate issue period: January 2006

Edge lettering: 2 **, repeated six times, alternately upright and inverted

----

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1-30 for a reference to all national sides that were issued in 2002.

(2)  See conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 8 December 2003 on changes in the design of national sides of euro coins. See also Commission Recommendation of 29 September 2003 on a common practice for changes to the design of national obverse sides of euro circulation coins (OJ L 264, 15.10.2003, p. 38-39).

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         157,970
<SECURITIES>                                17,431,855
<RECEIVABLES>                                  478,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   607
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,069,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          495,142
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,574,146
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,069,288
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               558,847
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                507,035
<INCOME-TAX>                                   507,035
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            507,035
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   507,035
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Voyageurs
National Park
Minnesota


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Native American
 Historic Ojibwe CanoeMN Historical SocietyThe first people to occupy the lands now designated as Voyageurs National Park arrived nearly 10,000 years ago during the Paleo-Indian Period.
Groups entered the area as the waters of glacial Lake Agassiz receded. This ancient lake once covered 110,000 square miles of Minnesota, North Dakota, Manitoba, Ontario and Saskatchewan in Canada.
During the Archaic Period (8,000 B.C. - 100 B.C.) people followed a mobile, hunting and gathering lifestyle. Fishing was a major source of food, although the gathering of plants continued to be important as well.
During the Woodland Period (100 A.D.- 900 A.D.) people increased their use of the wild rice that is native to this area. They began to use ceramics to fashion small, side-notched triangular projectile points.
Over 220 pre-contact archeological sites have been documented within the park, including sites that are now listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
Please remember while exploring the park that all archeological and historic resources are protected by law. Do not destroy or collect any items that you find; instead enjoy looking at the items and leave them where you found them.
 Last updated: April 25, 2018
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: Voyageurs National Park Headquarters
360 Hwy 11 East
International Falls,
MN
56649
 Phone: (218)-283-6600 Contact Us
 Tools Site Index
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
#### Charles F. Salisbury, appellee, v. Emory W. Murphy et al., appellants.

Filed May 6, 1903.

No. 12,825.

Foreclosure: Cancelation oe Debt. A foreclosure sale of real property, whether the purchaser is the mortgagee or a stranger to the action, is not a cancelation or extinguishment of the mortgage debt, so long as the mortgagor, by resisting confirmation or prosecuting appellate proceedings, prevents the mortgagee from obtaining actual payment either in land or money.

Appeal from the district court for Lincoln county: Hanson M. Grimes, District Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Thomas O. Patterson*and *Frank H.*Woods, for appellants.

*Wilcox é Ealligan, contra.*

*3Sullivan, C. J.

This case comes- here by appeal from an order of the district court for Lincoln county, confirming a foreclosure sale.

Some questions of practice discussed at length in the briefs and at the bar need not be considered, as they are raised by appellee, and the decision must, in any view of the case, he in his favor. The only question of substantive law presented by the record is: Whether a foreclosure sale of mortgaged property for a sum sufficient to satisfy the decree is to be regarded as payment, where the mortgagee is the purchaser and the order of confirmation is suspended by appeal. It is conceded that a mortgagee is in every case entitled to interest on the mortgage debt until it is paid; but it is asserted with apparent confidence that, when he is the purchaser, the amount of his bid is to be applied at once as a credit upon the decree, even where the mortgagor by instituting appellate proceedings continues to retain possession of the property. In other words, the contention of appellants is: That the sale to Salisbury operated as payment, although the mortgagor, by appealing from the order of confirmation, wrongfully withheld the title and possession of the property sold. This view of the matter is unsound both in law and morals, and the cases cited to sustain it *(Davis v. Dale,*150 Ill. 239, and *Bogardus v. Moses,*181 Ill. 554) are neither in point nor remotely analogous. They merely hold that the rights of the mortgagee as a purchaser are the same as they would have been if he were a stranger to the action. The question to be here determined is not with respect to the rights of the mortgagee as a purchaser, but whether the mortgage debt is to be regarded as paid and satisfied, by a sale which devested neither the title nor possession of the mortgagor. This question in a somewhat different form arose and was decided adversely to the contention of the appellants in *Trompen v. Hammond,*61 Neb. 446. That *4case in effect holds that a foreclosure sale, whether the purchaser is the mortgagee or a stranger, is not a cancelation or extinguishment of the mortgage debt, so long as the mortgagor, by resisting confirmation or prosecuting appellate proceedings, prevents the mortgagee from obtaining actual payment either in land or money. Entertaining no doubt as to the correctness of this conclusion, we think the order under review should he affirmed.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from consolidated financial statements and notes thereto to
Jefferson Savings Bancorp, Inc. at and for three months ended
March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      13,007,874
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,742,928
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                218,232,820
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                  1,276,089,911
<ALLOWANCE>                                  7,009,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,618,665,099
<DEPOSITS>                                 943,433,556
<SHORT-TERM>                               531,081,032
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         16,259,222
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       101,001
<OTHER-SE>                                 127,790,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,618,665,099
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             25,202,022
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,529,096
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               465,549
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            29,196,667
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          11,318,904
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          18,276,222
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       10,920,445
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  300,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (14,688)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              7,471,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,625,621
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,871,621
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,871,621
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.88
<LOANS-NON>                                  7,853,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   654,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             1,138,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             6,937,900
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  228,527
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            7,009,373
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         4,645,424
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      2,363,949


</TABLE>
§ 3712.3 Failure of claimant to file verified statement. If any claimant under any unpatented mining claim located prior to July 23, 1955, which embraces any of the lands described in any notice published in accordance with the regulations in this part shall fail to file a verified statement, as specified in such published notice (See § 3712.2-4), within one hundred and fifty days from the date of the first publication of such notice, such failure shall be conclusively deemed except as otherwise provided in § 3712.2-7. ( a ) To constitute a waiver and relinquishment by such mining claimant of any right, title or interest under such mining claim contrary to or in conflict with the limitations or restrictions specified in section 4 of the Act as to unpatented mining claims located after its enactment.
( b ) To constitute a consent by such mining claimant that such mining claim, prior to issuance of patent therefor, be subject to the limitations and restrictions specified in section 4 of the Act as to unpatented mining claims located after its enactment.
( c ) To preclude thereafter prior to the issuance of patent any assertion by such mining claimant of any right or title to or interest in or under such mining claim contrary to or in conflict with the limitations or restrictions specified in section 4 of the Act as to unpatented mining claims located after its enactment.
Safety & Security Cu

Commission Brief

Shawn W. Seeley, Chai

Organization of Agreement S

March 30, 2010
• In favor of policy statement 

• Regulation too formal• Agreement States: co-regulato
• Workshop

– Overall a success– Amazing process– 3 groups almost consensus
• Specific Comments 

– Safety Culture – starts at the top

• Management attitude/commitment

– Physical Supervision– Practice what you preach
• SC definition: must include ALL 

• Should be clear & concise• Need to continue early and ofte

stakeholder input
• Need easy to follow guidance f

– Make it “un-burdensome”

• Included in training all program• Must be performance based
• Challenges by States

– Unfunded mandates?– Limited resources?

• Safety & Security are interconn

– Currently being done in most Sta– Is it really different?
• States are On-Board

– Will spread the word

• Have same mission

– Comprehensive radiation protec
• Thank you 

– for the opportunity to participate 

• We look forward to working alo

NRC

– In this and any other project(s)
Questions
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.402 Appeal petition.

In addition to the requirements of § 134.203, an appeal petition must state, with specific reference to the determination and the record supporting such determination, the reasons why the determination is alleged to be arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law. This section does not apply to suspension appeals. For suspensions, see § 124.305 of this chapter.

[63 FR 35766, June 30, 1998, as amended at 67 FR 47250, July 18, 2002]
### §569. Reemployment rights

(a) A United States marshal for a judicial district who was appointed from a position in the competitive service (as defined in section 2102 of title 5) in the United States Marshals Service and who, for reasons other than misconduct, neglect of duty, or malfeasance, is removed from such office, is entitled to be reemployed in any vacant position in the competitive service in the United States Marshals Service at the same grade or pay level, or lower, as the individual's former position if—

(1) the individual is qualified for the vacant position; and

(2) the individual has made application for the position not later than ninety days after being removed from office as a United States marshal.

Such individual shall be so reemployed within thirty days after making such application or after being removed from office, whichever is later. An individual denied reemployment under this section in a position because the individual is not qualified for that position may appeal that denial to the Merit Systems Protection Board under section 7701 of title 5.

(b) Any United States marshal serving on the effective date of this section shall continue to serve for the remainder of the term for which such marshal was appointed, unless sooner removed by the President.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1211(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2163, §576; renumbered §569, Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7608(a)(2)(B), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4514.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The effective date of this section, referred to in subsec. (b), is Oct. 1, 1984. See Effective Date note set out below.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 569, added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(c), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 620; amended Pub. L. 95–598, title II, §221, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2662; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §501(12), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1742; Pub. L. 99–466, §3(a), Oct. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 1191, related to powers and duties generally and supervision by the Attorney General, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–690, §7608(a)(1). See section 566 of this title.

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–690 renumbered section 576 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1212, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2163, provided that: "The amendments made by this subpart [subpart B (§§1211, 1212) of part F of chapter XII of title II of Pub. L. 98–473, enacting this section] shall take effect on October 1, 1984."
August 31, 2006 

Steve Tarlton, P.E., Unit Leader 

Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division 

Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 

4300 Cherry Creek Drive South 

Denver, CO 80246-1530 

Dear Mr. Tarlton: 

On January 5, 2005, we sent you the results of our review of the final changes to the Colorado 

regulations which were submitted to the NRC by letter dated November 18, 2004. These 

regulations were reviewed by comparison to the equivalent Nuclear Regulatory Commission 



 NRm 

SECTION

 STATE 

SECTION 

RATS ID CATEGORY SUBJECT and COMMENTS 

31.5 (c)(4) 

1-3.6.4.3(4) 

Certain detecting, measuring, 

gauging, or controlM2u./.cesCT anE 

Certain /.cesCf, oproduclM2ulightg, 6

6

NRC Chronology Identificatio n FR Notic e (Date Du e fo r State Imple mentaion) RATS ID Propos ed (P) / Fina l (F) 1 Rule / Licen s Condition (LC) ML # 5 NRC Rev iew / Y, N 2 / Date / ML # 5 Fina l St te Re gula ion 1 (Effectiv e Date) 6 De finition of La nd 

NRC Chronology Identificatio n FR Notic e (Date Du e fo r State Imple mentaion) RATS ID Propos ed.7777Tm(7.977Tm583 0 )TjECriteriTT/TT0 1 Tf9 0 0 9 18633832778ET9164583 0 583 0 .7777Tm(7.977Tm572974T)TjETET522</MCID 3 >B0Re07777T6.279613T572974T
NRC Chronology Identificatio n FR Notic e (Date Du e fo r State Imple mentaion) RATS IDdPTm/m(State )TjETBT/TT0 121f0.00089 2 0.00.42Tw 9 0 00 9 4296 r76 6Fin772Tm(ta)TjETBT/TT0 1 Tf28 re1 0 9 4296 r76 6l (F)(State )TjETBT/TT-0.0006 0 00 1 T0 009.0 00 9 38 re76 61(State )TjETBT/TT0 1 1f0.00081 2 0.00.42Tw 301 00 9 322l 6.0 Rule/m(State )TjETBT/TT0 1 28-0.0006 Tc 02Tw 9 0 00 2220 01 r76 6L72Tm(ta)TjETBT/TT ID taTS State r m(e )Tj0 2TjETBT/TTn
|  | (1) | such      Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended November      30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the      information contained in such Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three      and nine months ended November 30, 2009 fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Magna-Lab,      Inc. |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                  |   |                                               |
|-----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
| January      14, 2010 |   | /s/      Lawrence A. Minkoff                       |
|                  |   | Name:      Lawrence A. Minkoff                     |
|                  |   | Title:      President (principal executiveofficer) |