alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 24, 2012

p0917

Order 

September 24, 2012

144767

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144767

COA: 300966 

Oakland CC: 2010-231539-FH

FREDERICK LEE-IBARAJ RHIMES,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 17, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal to consider the constitutionality of 

MCL 768.27b.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Southern District of Florida

DAVID “RYAN” MCCAIGUE, an individual

DOENCH WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC;

and BRIAN H. DOENCH, an individual

DOENCH WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC

1712 Mattox Court

Charlottesville, Virginia 22903

David C. Silver, Esq.

Silver Miller

11780 W. Sample Road

Coral Springs, FL 33065

E-mail: DSilver@SilverMillerLaw.com

Case 0:20-cv-61321-WPD Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2020 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00

Case 0:20-cv-61321-WPD Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2020 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 4.436

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182538 dated July 15, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Data transmission services, except for data transmission services for the purpose of voice transmission

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until July 15, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 23, 2020 No. 172-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Terlyakov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here

Official seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS,
   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119591
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-035 April 19, 2000

WORKING GROUP MEETING ON CONTROL OF SOLID MATERIALS CANCELLED

A paper being prepared for the Commission on issues associated with the control of solid

materials from licensed facilities having very small amounts of residual radioactivity is finished and

ready for management review, eliminating the need for an upcoming meeting.

The NRC staff has cancelled a March 8 meeting intended for interested parties to observe

development of the paper. The meeting was to have been the third in a series held for this purpose.

The agency is examining its approach for the control of solid materials, and currently evaluates

license requests for release of solid materials on a case-by-case basis.

The Commission paper, expected in March, will communicate stakeholder concerns and

develop issues for Commission consideration.

###
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTAFEDERALCENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 Myra Reece, Bureau Chief Bureau ofAir Quality Environmental Quality Control South Carolina Department of

Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia. South Carolina 29201
Dear Ms. Reece: Enclosed isthe final end-of-year report for your agency's 

### FY 2009 Air Pollution Control grant as authorized by section 105ofthe Clean Air Act. This report outlines your agency's various grant commitments and their status. However, Region 4 has identified one issue and provides the following comment: Regarding commitment number three under "More People Breathing Cleaner Air," requiring States to revise 8-hour or 1-hour ozone SIPSas applicable and according to 

### DC Court-related actions. Thank you for your continued work to address this grant commitment and requirement. We have worked with you on the development ofyour revised submission and understand that you released the submission for public comment on February 26, 2010 and will provide the final submission in the AprilIMay timeframe. If you have any questions onthis comment, please contact Zuri Farngalo of the Region 4 staff at (404) 562-9152. With the exception noted above, EPA has determined that the Statehas made satisfactory progress in implementing its 2009 Air Pollution Control commitments. This letter documents the conclusion of thejoint evaluation process required by 40 Code ofFederal Regulations 35.115. A copy of the final end-of-yearreport is enclosed for your reference.
We appreciate theprogress you made in 

### FY 2009 and look forward to continuing our joint efforts to protect and improve air quality. Ifyou have any questions or comments, please contact me at (404) 562-9097 or Angela Isom at (404) 562-9092. Sincerely,

w 

### R. Douglas Neeley Chief Air Toxics and Monitoring Branch
Enclosure

internet Address (URL) http://www.epa.gov RecycledlRecyclable .Printed wkth Vegetable Oil Based Inkson RecydedPaper (Minimum30% Postconsumer)
#### KELLY, Respondent, v. McQUILLAN et al., Appellants.

(201 N. W. 158.)

(File No. 5689.

Opinion filed December 2, 1924.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County.

*Buell F. Jones,*of Britton, for respondent.

*Otto L. Kaas,*of Britton, for Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer and a judgment thereafter entered.

The notice of appeal and .-bond was served and filed in this case July 3, 1924. The record duly -certified -by -the -clerk was filed with the clerk of this court July.9, 1924. No other papers have been filed. . •

Appellant having failed to-comply with rules 5, 6, 7, and 13 of this court, relating to appeals, this appeal is'deemed abandoned, and the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
458 P.2d 98

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor TAFOYA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 320.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Aug. 8, 1969.

*495Frank P. Dickson, Jr., Turner W. Branch, Albuquerque, for appellant.

James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Vince D’Angelo, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for .appellee.

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of aggravated burglary and aggravated battery.

Defendant contends “the judgment of •sentence and conviction should be reversed because the verdict is not supported by substantial evidence and the verdict is ■clearly unjust and flagrantly wrong.” We disagree.

Defendant admitted the burglary. The victim’s testimony supports a determination that defendant, after his unauthorized ■entry, armed himself with a gun and committed a battery on his victim. See § 40A-16-4, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 6). The victim’s testimony also supports a determination that defendant committed the battery with the gun and with intent to injure. See § 40A-3-5, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 6).

Defendant asserts the victim’s testimony is not substantial evidence because not corroborated. He states that apart from the victim’s testimony there is no evidence a gun was used. First, there was corroboration. The victim testified he recognized the gun as one that belonged to his father. The defendant testified he threw the gun away after leaving the scene. The victim testified he was struck on and about his face. There were photographs of the victim showing facial cuts and abrasions. Second, corroboration was not required. See State v. Turnbow, *67*N.M. 241, 354 P.2d 533, 89 A.L.R.2d 461 (1960) where it is stated that an accused may be convicted upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. Here the testimony was from the victim, not an accomplice.

Defendant also complains of conflicts in the testimony of a police officer. It was for the jury to resolve such conflicts and determine the credibility of the officer’s testimony. State v. Encee, 79 N.M. 23, 439 P.2d 240 (Ct.App.1968).

On appeal we examine the evidence in the light most favorable to support the verdict. State v. Encee, supra. We have so examined and find the verdict is supported by substantial evidence. Davis v. Padilla, 79 N.M. 753, 449 P.2d 661 (1969); and State v. Moser, 80 N.M. 404, 456 P.2d 878, decided June 30, 1969.

Defendant contends he was not given credit for time spent in presentence confinement in accordance with § 40A-29-25, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 6). This point is conceded by the State.

Accordingly, we affirm the conviction but remand to the trial court to determine the credit for time spent in presentence confinement according to § 40A-29-25, supra.

It is so ordered.

SPIESS, C. J., and WOOD, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 28, 1998 AND THE RELATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 13 WEEKS ENDED MARCH 28, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<NAME>       NO. 3
<CIK>        0000895366
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                             995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,633
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     79,592
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,394
<PP&E>                                          36,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,561)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 268,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,686
<BONDS>                                        215,218
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           170
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   268,520
<SALES>                                        119,383
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,383
<CGS>                                           90,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (955)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (955)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (23,600)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,555)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.77)
        


</TABLE>
HomeAbout NRCContracting OpportunitiesInformation for Small Businesses

# Other Useful Small Business and Acquisition Links

This page provides links to a variety of non-NRC servers and Web sites, which offer a wealth of information and resources that may be useful to small businesses. However, please note that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is providing these links solely as a reference for the convenience of users. The NRC cannot guarantee the authenticity of documents or the validity of information obtained at these non-NRC sites. For additional information, see our Site Disclaimer and the following topics on this page:
        - Web Resources
        - Training
        - Upcoming Events

## Web Resources

For more information about opportunities for small businesses, see the following links to non-NRC servers and Web sites:
        - Small Business Administration (SBA)
        - FedBizOpps
        - Acquisition
        - GSA Federal Acquisition Service
        - National Women's Business Council
        - Minority Business Development Agency

## Training

The SBA offers more than 25 free online courses that may be valuable to small businesses.

## Upcoming Events

NRC Annual Small Business Seminar and Matchmaking Event  – The Small Business Program hosts and delivers (in collaboration with the agency's Acquisition Management Division, Office of the General Counsel, and the major technical program offices), an Annual Small Business Seminar and Matchmaking Event (Seminar) on how to conduct business with the agency.

In addition, the following non-NRC events may be useful to small businesses:
        - Calendar of Small Business Events

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 10, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Overview of the Small Business Program
          - Tips for Conducting Business with NRC
          - Forecast of Contracting Opportunities
          - Small Business Contracting Programs
          - Small Business Exchange and Matchmaking Events
          - Other Useful Small Business and Acquisition Links
          - Subcontracting Opportunities
          - Calendar of Small Business Events

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, December 10, 2020
114 STAT. 638 PUBLIC LAW 106–254—AUG. 2, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1791:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106–372 (Comm. on the Judiciary).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 145 (1999): Oct. 12, considered and passed House.

Vol. 146 (2000): July 19, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–254

106th Congress

An Act

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties for harming animals

used in Federal law enforcement.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Law Enforcement Animal

Protection Act of 2000’’.

SEC. 2. HARMING ANIMALS USED IN LAW ENFORCEMENT.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 65 of title 18, United States Code,

is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘§ 1368. Harming animals used in law enforcement

‘‘(a) Whoever willfully and maliciously harms any police animal,

or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title

and imprisoned not more than 1 year. If the offense permanently

disables or disfigures the animal, or causes serious bodily injury

or the death of the animal, the maximum term of imprisonment

shall be 10 years.

‘‘(b) In this section, the term ‘police animal’ means a dog or

horse employed by a Federal agency (whether in the executive,

legislative, or judicial branch) for the principal purpose of aiding

in the detection of criminal activity, enforcement of laws, or

apprehension of criminal offenders.’’.

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 65 of title 18, United States Code, is amended

by adding at the end the following new item:

‘‘1368. Harming animals used in law enforcement.’’.

Approved August 2, 2000.

18 USC 1368

note.

Federal Law

Enforcement

Animal

Protection Act of

2000.

Aug. 2, 2000

[H.R. 1791]

PUBLIC LAW 106–254—AUG. 2, 2000 114 STAT. 639

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22893]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Association of Fire Equipment 
Distributors

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Association of 
Fire Equipment Distributors (``NAFED'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: National 
Association of Fire Equipment Distributors, Chicago, IL. The nature and 
scope of NAFED's standards development activities are: certification 
testing for individuals involved in the sale, service, maintenance, 
training, and testing of fire extinguishers, fire extinguishing 
systems, and life safety equipment.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-22893 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual report of Fun City Popcorn, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Richard A.
Falk, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



                                            /s/  Richard A. Falk
                                            --------------------------------
                                                 Richard A. Falk
                                                 President
                                                 and Principal Financial Officer


                                December 24, 2002
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-14527

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00328-TCB-LTW-3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RUFFINO TORRES-PINEDA, 

a.k.a. Nino, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(November 12, 2014)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 13-14527 Date Filed: 11/12/2014 Page: 1 of 2 
2

David H. Jones, appointed counsel for Ruffino Torres-Pineda in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of 

Torres-Pineda and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 

87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record 

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. 

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of 

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Torres-Pineda’s 

convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-14527 Date Filed: 11/12/2014 Page: 2 of 2