alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Trail Of Tears
National Historic Trail
AL, AR, GA, IL, KY, MO, NC, OK, TN


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Plan Your Visit
 The sites on Trail of Tears National Historic Trail, stretching 5,043 miles across nine states, together form a journey of compassion and understanding. The trail commemorates the forced removal of Cherokee from their homelands; the paths that 17 Cherokee detachments followed westward; and the revival of the Cherokee Nation. We encourage you to retrace the trail on foot, by vehicle, over water, by bicycle or horse—to sacred sites that tell the story of suffering and intolerance, but just as important, one of survival.

A brown sign "Trail of Tears, Original route," next to a dirt road.Basic Info
Find info about fees & passes, FAQs, special alerts, how to see ruts & swales, and more.
A large brown sign indicating the presence of a historic plantation.Directions
Navigate the trail miles with maps, interactive GIS maps, sign info and more.
A group of people stand in a row, straddling their bicycles.Things To Do
Bike, hike, run, horseback ride, paddle, birdwatch, climb, camp, RV, photograph - there are countless ways to explore your historic trails!
A few wayside signs sit on a cement river overlook.Places to Go
Where can you visit the trail? Use the interactive map to find places to visit.
A small log cabin with a large covered front porch.Trip Ideas
Follow a travel itinerary to explore multiple trail sites in one region.

Trip Planning
The Trail of Tears National Historic Trail passes through the present-day states of Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Tennessee. Due to the trail's length, you may decide to travel its entirety or just one or two sites. Take time to plan your trip to meet your needs.
Publications
Read / print / order trail brochures.
Trail of Tears Guidebooks
Find a bibliography of guidebooks for the Trail of Tears.
Travel and Tourism Contacts by State
Contact travel and tourism bureaus for various states.
Visiting the Cherokee Nation
Learn more about the Cherokee Nation.
 Last updated: July 14, 2022
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: National Trails Office Regions 6|7|8
Trail of Tears National Historic Trail
1100 Old Santa Fe Trail
Santa Fe,
NM
87505
 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
### §1709. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 95–395, §10, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 817, which provided for preservation of certain other Federal benefits, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
**Exhibit
      32.1**


CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
          connection with the annual report of China
          Digital Communication Group (the
          "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
          with
          the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
          I, Xu
          Zhongnan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 1)
          The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2)
          The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
                August 6,
                2008
              By: */s/ Xu
                Zhongnan*Xu ZhongnanChief
                Executive
                Officer
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Apparent Unauthorized Use of Byproduct Material, Resurrection Hospital, Chicago, Illinois

## HPPOS-156 PDR-9111220130

See the memorandum from L. B. Higginbotham to J. M. Allan dated August 14, 1975.

If a licensee administers a radiopharmaceutical for an authorized procedure, it may conduct additional unauthorized procedures, provided that additional administrations are not given. HPPOS-313 contains a related topic.

An interpretation of what constitutes a venogram in nuclear medicine was sought. A venogram is defined as blood vein imaging that includes both blood pool imaging and blood flow studies. For all practical purposes, these two studies are inseparable; that is, blood pool images will also define the rate of blood flow depending on the presence of embolisms in the venous system being imaged.

Such embolisms could include blood clots in the veins. Venous imaging is usually necessary to evaluate the outcome of lung scans and is commonly used in conjunction with lung scans.

If a licensee administers a radiopharmaceutical for a license-authorized procedure, it may conduct any number of additional procedures whether they are authorized or not provided that additional administrations are not performed for purposes of the unauthorized procedure (although additional administrations may be needed for the authorized procedure).

The basis for the above is that once a dose is administered to a patient for a procedure that is authorized, no additional harm from radioactive materials can result to the patient during the conduct of other medical procedures. Of course, administering a dose solely for an unauthorized procedure is in noncompliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

The above interpretation has the concurrence of OELD and DBER.

**Regulatory references:** License Conditions

**Subject codes:** 3.8

**Applicability:** Byproduct Material

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 16, 2017
#### UNITED STATES of America v. PSOINOS CONSTRUCTION CO., Inc. and Costas G. Psoinos.

Crim. No. 67-182-W.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

April 5, 1968.

Paul F. Markham, U. S. Atty., Stanislaw R. J. Suchecki, Asst. U. S. Atty., for plaintiff.

Harold Rosenwald, Boston, Mass., Robert H. Goldman, Lowell, Mass., for defendant.

OPINION

WYZANSKI, Chief Judge.

The case is before the Court on a motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that it fails to allege an offense under 29 U.S.C. § 186.

That section provides as follows:

> “(a) It shall be unlawful for any employer or association of employers or any person who acts as a labor relations expert, adviser, or consultant to an employer or who acts in the interest of an employer to pay, lend, or deliver, or agree to pay, lend, or deliver, any money or other thing of value—

> ******

> “(2) to any labor organization, or any officer or employee thereof, which represents, seeks to represent, or would admit to membership, *any of the employees of such employer who are employed in an industry affecting commerce;*

> ******

> (d) Any person who willfully violates any of the provisions of this sec*474tion shall, upon conviction thereof, be guilty of a misdemeanor and be subject to a fine of not more than $10,-000 or to imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.” (Emphasis supplied)

The indictment alleges:

> “On or about June 2, 1966, at Methuen in the District of Massachusetts, PSOINOS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., a corporation organized and existing in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, with a usual place of business in Dracut, Massachusetts, and COSTAS G. PSOINOS of Dracut in said District, then an officer, that is treasurer, of said corporation, the employers of employees employed in an industry affecting commerce, did unlawfully, wilfully and knowingly pay and deliver, and agree to pay and deliver, to John F. Bums, then an employee, that is, business representative of Local Union No. 82, Haverhill, Massachusetts, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, a labor organization which seeks to represent and would admit to membership employees of said employers, money in the amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000), more or less; in violation of 29 U.S.C. 186(a) (2).”

The motion draws attention to the fact that there is no allegation in the indictment that the employees whom Local Union No. 82 seeks to represent are themselves employed in an industry affecting commerce. All that appears is that their employers are in an industry affecting commerce and that they are employees of such an interstate establishment.

Inasmuch as it may well be that the employees whom Local Union No. 82 seeks to represent are themselves not employed in an industry affecting commerce, the indictment fails to charge the offense denominated by the statute. Cf. Sheet Metal Contractors Association v. Sheet Metal Workers International Association, 248 F.2d 307 (C.A.9, 1957). In short, there is missing an essential element requisite under the statute.

Motion to dismiss granted.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear at 68 FR 51349, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 117.9 Compliance information. ( a ) *Cooperation and assistance.* SBA shall, to the fullest extent practicable, seek the cooperation of recipients in obtaining compliance with this part and shall provide assistance and guidance to recipients to help them comply voluntarily with this part.
( b ) *Record Keeping.* Each recipient shall keep records in such form, and containing such information which SBA determines may be necessary to ascertain whether the recipient has complied or is complying with this part (OMB No. 3245 0076). In the case of a small business concern which receives financial assistance from a development company or from a small business investment company, the small business concern shall also keep such records and information as may be necessary to enable SBA to determine if the small business concern is complying with this part.
( c ) Each recipient shall provide to SBA, upon request, information and reports which SBA determines are necessary to ascertain whether the recipient is complying with the Act and these regulations.
( d ) *Access to sources of information.* Each recipient shall permit reasonable access by SBA during normal business hours to such of its books, records, accounts, and other sources of information, and its facilities as may be pertinent to ascertain compliance with this part. Where any information required of an applicant or recipient is in the exclusive possession of any other agency, institution or person and that agency, institution or person shall fail or refuse to furnish the information, the recipient shall so certify and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the required information. The recipient will be held responsible for submitting the information. Failure to submit information or permit access to sources of information required by SBA will subject the recipient to enforcement procedure as provided in § 117.15 of this part.
(Information collection requirements in paragraph (c) were approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 3245-0076)
#### § 129.200 What definitions are important in this subpart?

*Covered period* means the 2-year period beginning on the date on which the President declared the applicable major disaster. 15 U.S.C. 636(j)(f)(13)(F)(ii)(I)(aa).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Alberto TOLEDO-VIDES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41034.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 1, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, Mark Michael Dowd, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Brownsville, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Luis Alberto Toledo-Vides appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Toledo-Vides argues that his sentence should be vacated and remanded because the district court sentenced him under the mandatory guidelines scheme held unconstitutional in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

Because the district court sentenced Toledo-Vides under a mandatory guidelines regime, it committed error. *See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d 728, 733 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 267, 163 L.Ed.2d 240 (2005); *see also United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 463 (5th Cir.2005). The Government concedes that Toledo-Vides’s objection below preserved his claim. We cannot affirm the erroneous sentence unless the Government shows that the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. *See United States v. Pineiro,*410 F.3d 282, 285-86 (5th Cir.2005). We conclude that the Government has not met its burden. *See United States v. Garza,*429 F.3d 165, 171 (5th Cir.2005). We therefore VACATE Toledo-Vides’s sentence and remand for re-sentencing.

Toledo-Vides also challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Al*
      *413
      *mendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Toledo-Vides contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Toledo-Vides properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for farther review. Accordingly, ToledoVides’s conviction is AFFIRMED.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; CASE REMANDED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No: IV-23-005 June 21, 2023 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128 

NRC Schedules a Regulatory Conference with Entergy Operations

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a regulatory conference with officials from 

Entergy Operations on July 6, beginning at 9 a.m. Central time, to discuss the safety significance of 

an inspection finding at the Grand Gulf nuclear power plant in Port Gibson, Mississippi. The 

finding was identified during a November 2022 inspection. 

The purpose of the conference is for NRC and Entergy officials to discuss a preliminary 

finding of low-to-moderate safety significance before the agency makes a final determination. 

This conference is open to public observation and questions following the formal portion of 

the meeting. The meeting will be held at the NRC’s Region IV office at 1600 East Lamar Blvd., 

Arlington, Texas. Members of the public also can participate online through Microsoft Teams, 

using Meeting ID: 228 401 841 344, Passcode: daGCZa, or by calling 301-576-2978 and using 

conference ID: 868 400 370#. 

The preliminary finding and associated apparent violations of NRC requirements involve the 

calibration and operability of high-range area radiation monitors in the drywell and containment, 

and related errors in the classification of emergency action levels under the licensee’s emergency 

plan. The finding is described in NRC’s May 18 inspection report. 

A decision on the final safety significance of the preliminary violations or any NRC actions 

will not be made at the meeting.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Wupatki
National Monument
Arizona


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Laws & Policies
 **Firearms Policy**
As of February 22, 2010, a federal law allows people who can legally possess firearms under applicable federal, state, and local laws, to legally possess firearms in this park. It is the responsibility of visitors to understand and comply with all applicable state, local, and federal firearms laws before entering this park. As a starting point, please visit our state’s public safety website.  For any questions, you can e-mail us or contact the Chief Ranger at (928) 526-3367 x 223. *Federal law also prohibits firearms in certain facilities in this park; those places are marked with signs at all public entrances. The Visitor Center does not permit firearms.*

**Superintendent's Compendium**
The Superintendent's Compendium  establishes regulatory provisions for the management, protection, and public use of Wupatki, Sunset Crater Volcano, and Walnut Canyon National Monuments. The document is written under the authority of 36 CFR Chapter 1, Parts 1–7, as well as 54 USC §100751.
 Last updated: November 9, 2023
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 6400 U.S. 89
Flagstaff,
AZ
86004
 Phone: 928-679-2365 Contact Us
 Tools Site Index
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
#### Polly Scott et al., Respondents, v. Samuel Tafel et al., Appellants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### § 4.1124 Certification of interlocutory ruling.

Upon motion or upon the initiative of an administrative law judge, the judge may certify to the Board a ruling which does not finally dispose of the case if the ruling presents a controlling question of law and an immediate appeal would materially advance ultimate disposition by the judge.
§ 113.205 Educational institutions and other entities controlled by religious organizations. ( a ) *Exemption.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to any operation of an educational institution or other entity that is controlled by a religious organization to the extent that application of these Title IX regulations would not be consistent with the religious tenets of such organization.
( b ) *Exemption claims.* An educational institution or other entity that wishes to claim the exemption set forth in paragraph (a) of this section shall do so by submitting in writing to the designated agency official a statement by the highest-ranking official of the institution, identifying the provisions of these Title IX regulations that conflict with a specific tenet of the religious organization.
EX-10.10





 Exhibit 10.10 

ADDENDUM #13 TO THE 

CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY MANAGEMENT SERVICES 

AGREEMENT 
 BETWEEN

 DAVIES CAPTIVE MANAGEMENT LIMITED (“MANAGER”) 

(formerly Citadel Management Bermuda Limited) 

AND 
 AMERINST INSURANCE
COMPANY, LTD. (“COMPANY”) 
 EFFECTIVE: January 1, 2021 

Management Agreement Addendum 
  

	 	1)	 It is hereby agreed that the COMPANY will compensate MANAGER at a rate of $350,000 for the twelve months
beginning 1/1/21 and ending 12/31/21 (such fee to be reviewed in July 2021), which shall be inclusive of all work by MANAGER on run-off of CAMICO and PDIC treaties as well as continuing business from
Crum & Forster. 


  

	 	2)	 Cause the above fee to be paid in quarterly installments in advance at the beginning of each calendar quarter.



  

	 	3)	 Reimburse MANAGER for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred during the management of the COMPANY including; courier and express mail service; long distance telephone calls; travel and meeting
expenses incurred at the request of the COMPANY; costs of COMPANY stationery; filing fees; and similar expenses. 


  

	 	4)	 MANAGER will continue to provide COMPANY with time summaries on a biannual basis. 



COMPANY agrees that special projects will be invoiced separately at agreed upon fees or rates. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Addendum this 8th day of March, 2021. 

 

			
	 By:
	 	 /s/  THOMAS R. MCMAHON

		 	 Davies Captive Management Limited



  

			
	 By:
	 	 /s/  STUART H. GRAYSTON

		 	 AmerInst Insurance Company, Ltd.




  
 1
§ 4120.3-3 Range improvement permits. ( a ) Any permittee or lessee may apply for a range improvement permit to install, use, maintain, and/or modify removable range improvements that are needed to achieve management objectives for the allotment in which the permit or lease is held. The permittee or lessee shall agree to provide full funding for construction, installation, modification, or maintenance. Such range improvement permits are issued at the discretion of the authorized officer.
( b ) The permittee or lessee may hold the title to authorized removable range improvements used as livestock handling facilities such as corrals, creep feeders, and loading chutes, and to temporary structural improvements such as troughs for hauled water.
( c ) If forage available for livestock is not or will not be used by the preference permittee or lessee, BLM may issue nonrenewable grazing permits or leases to other qualified applicants to use it under §§ 4130.6-2 and 4130.4(d), or § 4110.3-1(a)(2). The term “forage available for livestock” does not include temporary nonuse that BLM approves for reasons of natural resource conservation, enhancement, or protection, or use suspended by BLM under § 4110.3-2(b). Before issuing a nonrenewable permit or lease, BLM will consult, cooperate, and coordinate as provided in § 4130.6-2. If BLM issues such a nonrenewable permit or lease, the preference permittee or lessee shall cooperate with the temporary authorized use of forage by another operator. ( 1 ) A permittee or lessee shall be reasonably compensated for the use and maintenance of improvements and facilities by the operator who has an authorization for temporary grazing use.
( 2 ) The authorized officer may mediate disputes about reasonable compensation and, following consultation with the interested parties, make a determination concerning the fair and reasonable share of operation and maintenance expenses and compensation for use of authorized improvements and facilities.
( 3 ) Where a settlement cannot be reached, the authorized officer shall issue a temporary grazing authorization including appropriate terms and conditions and the requirement to compensate the preference permittee or lessee for the fair share of operation and maintenance as determined by the authorized officer under subpart 4160 of this part.
[49 FR 6452, Feb. 21, 1984; 49 FR 12704, Mar. 30, 1984, as amended at 60 FR 9964, Feb. 22, 1995; 71 FR 39505, July 12, 2006]
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Wing Luke Museum
Affiliated AreaWashington