alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Allen H. Stem, Individually and as Surviving Partner, etc., Respondent, v. Whitney Warren and Others, Impleaded with Charles D. Wetmore, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________ No. 98-2339

________________ Dave Garey, also known as Freddy Mertz, Appellant,
v. Bonneville Internationa l Corporation, a Utah Corporation; RonCarter; Deseret Mutual Benefit Administrators, a Uta h Corporation, Appellees. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. [UNPUBLISHED]

________________ Submitted: March 18, 1999 Filed: March 24, 1999

________________ Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

________________ PER CURIAM. Dave Garey appeals from the district court's 1 dismissal of his action with prejudice, and the assessment of costs, after Garey failed to appear at his court-2

ordereddeposition. After careful review of the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. We have considered and now deny Garey's motions for sanctions, to present oral argument, and for permission to present "evidentiary testimony" by telephone. Acco rdingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 1 - 1222 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 0 -NM - 26 8 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                
                                
                                
                                






<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>          1554
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>         1488
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>           1554
<EQUITIES>                     201
<MORTGAGE>                       0
<REAL-ESTATE>                    0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                1763
<CASH>                          26
<RECOVER-REINSURE>              14
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>          54
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                2635
<POLICY-LOSSES>               1211
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>            380
<POLICY-OTHER>                   0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>            5
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      0
<COMMON>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                     910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  2635
<PREMIUMS>                     217
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>             25
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>               4
<OTHER-INCOME>                   1
<BENEFIT>                      160
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>     37
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>            20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 30
<INCOME-TAX>                     6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             24
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                    24
<EPS-BASIC>                   0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0.69
<RESERVE-OPEN>                1206
<PROVISION-CURRENT>            173
<PROVISION-PRIOR>              (15)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>              50
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>               108
<RESERVE-CLOSE>               1211
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>          4
        




</TABLE>
Case 0:99-cv-06410-JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/1999 Page 1 of 8
Case 0:99-cv-06410-JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/1999 Page 2 of 8
Case 0:99-cv-06410-JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/1999 Page 3 of 8
Case 0:99-cv-06410-JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/1999 Page 4 of 8
Case 0:99-cv-06410-JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/1999 Page 5 of 8
Case 0:99-cv-06410-JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/1999 Page 6 of 8
Case 0:99-cv-06410-JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/1999 Page 7 of 8
Case 0:99-cv-06410-JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/1999 Page 8 of 8
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3634] 

In accordance with a notice received from the Department of Homeland Security—Federal Emergency Management Agency—effective September 29, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to include the Municipality of Fajardo as a disaster area due to damages caused by Tropical Storm Jeanne. All other municipalities contiguous to the above named primary municipality have previously been declared. 

In addition, Adjuntas, Aguada, Aguadilla, Aguas Buenas, Aibonito, Arecibo, Arroyo, Barceloneta, Caguas, Camuy, Cayey, Cidra, Comerio, Corozal, Culebra, Guaynabo, Hatillo, Hormigueros, Humacao, Jayuya, Las Marias, Las Piedras, Luquillo, Manati, Maricao, Maunabo, Morovis, Naguabo, Orocovis, Patillas, Quebradillas, Rincon, Santa Isabel, Trujillo Alto Municipalities, Utuado, Vieques, Villalba, and Yabucoa Municipalities in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico are also eligible under Public Assistance and our disaster loan program is available for private non-profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature in those municipalities. 

The Public Assistance number assigned to Puerto Rico is P06308. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is November 22, 2004 and for economic injury the deadline is June 21, 2005.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008.) 

Dated: October 6, 2004. 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-23140 Filed 10-14-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe spacecraft control laboratory experiment optical attitude measurement systemA stereo camera tracking system was developed to provide a near real-time measure of the position and attitude of the Spacecraft COntrol Laboratory Experiment (SCOLE). The SCOLE is a mockup of the shuttle-like vehicle with an attached flexible mast and (simulated) antenna, and was designed to provide a laboratory environment for the verification and testing of control laws for large flexible spacecraft. Actuators and sensors located on the shuttle and antenna sense the states of the spacecraft and allow the position and attitude to be controlled. The stereo camera tracking system which was developed consists of two position sensitive detector cameras which sense the locations of small infrared LEDs attached to the surface of the shuttle. Information on shuttle position and attitude is provided in six degrees-of-freedom. The design of this optical system, calibration, and tracking algorithm are described. The performance of the system is evaluated for yaw only.Document ID19910011873Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWelch, Sharon S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Montgomery, Raymond C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Barsky, Michael F.*(Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ. Blacksburg., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1991Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102624NAS 1.15:102624Accession Number91N21186Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 590-14-11-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910011873.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Reporting of Damaged Portable Moisture-Density Gauges

## HPPOS-322 PDR-9308020160

See the memorandum from R. E. Cunningham to R. W. Cooper (and others) dated July 1, 1993. 

This memo clarifies the reporting requirements for damaged moisture-density gauges that often contain up to 10 millicuries of cesium-137 (Cs-137).

Whether licensees must report damaged moisture-density gauges depends on the extent of damage to the gauge. The requirement to report also depends on the level of radiation in an unrestricted area or doses to individuals resulting from the damaged gauge. The applicable reporting requirements are given in 10 CFR 20.405 (a) (1), 20.2203 (a), and 30.50 (b). The enclosure to this memo provides a detailed analysis of the reporting requirements.

In summary, reporting is required in most incidents when damage to the gauge results in one of several conditions (see enclosure):
        -  The protective housing (shielding) is damaged such that the source is not fully shielded, or cannot be moved into the shielded position [10 CFR 30.50]; 
        -   The source is left exposed in an unrestricted area such that the radiation levels exceed 20 mrem in any one hour (10 times the limit of 2 mrem in any one hour) [10 CFR 20.405 and 20.2203]; or 
        -  The incident results in doses in excess of limits in Part 20 or in the license [10 CFR 20.405 and 20.2203]. 

Please note that the method of reporting and the associated time for the licensee to make the report are different for conditions 1, 2, and 3 above.

In a more serious case involving a broken sealed source that leads to contamination, reporting within 24 hours is required [10 CFR 30.50 (b) (1)]. Likewise, in a case involving a sealed source that causes, or threatens to cause, serious overexposures, immediate notification or 24-hour notification and subsequent written reporting may be required [10 CFR 20.403, 10 CFR 20.2202, and 10 CFR 20.2203]. However, these situations are beyond the scope of most damaged gauge incidents and will not be discussed here.

Finally, immediate telephonic reporting of loss or theft of a portable moisture-density gauge is required in most cases, and a written report within 30 days is required in nearly all cases.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 20.405, 10 CFR 20.2203, 10 CFR 30.50 

**Subject codes:** 2.2, 3.7, 11.2, 11.3

**Applicability:** Byproduct Material

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017
#### Carl S. Zekaria, Respondent, v. Cooper & Cooper, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
#### W. S. Gillman, appellant, v. Frank Topinka et *al.,*appellees.

Filed June 9, 1904.

No. 13,480.

Appeal from the district court for Box Butte county: Jabíes J. Harrington, Judge.

*Reversed with*directions.

*R. C. Noleman*and *W. G. Simonson,*for appellant.

Ames, C.

This is an action to foreclose a real estate mortgage, begun by the usual petition and due service of process. The mortgagors made default; but another defendant, who claimed some interest in the premises — the record does'not disclose what — appeared and moved to dismiss the action, for the alleged reason that the subject matter of it had been previously adjudicated between parties other than those to this suit. No answer or other pleading was filed. The court sustained the motion and rendered a judgment of dismissal. The plaintiff appeals. There is no appearance for the appellee or appellees in this court.

It is recommended that the judgment of the district court be reversed and the cause remanded, -with instruí-* tions to render a decree as prayed in the petition, uni a defense shall be established by pleadings and proofs.

LETTON and Oldhabi, CC., concur.

By the Court:

For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, it is ordered that the judgment of the district court be reversed and the cause remanded, with instructions to render a decree as prayed in the petition, unless a defense shall be established by pleadings and proofs.

Reversed.
No: 24-010 February 2, 2024 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Makes Available Browns Ferry’s Subsequent License Renewal Application 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received a subsequent license renewal 

application from the Tennessee Valley Authority, which requests an additional 20 years of 

operation for all three reactors at the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant in Athens, Alabama. The 

application to renew the reactor licenses from 60 to 80 years is now available for public 

inspection on the NRC website. 

TVA filed the application on Jan. 19 seeking to renew the license for a second time. 

Browns Ferry’s three boiling-water reactors are approximately 32 miles west of Huntsville, 

Alabama. The NRC approved in May 2006 the first renewal of the reactors’ licensing term from 

40 to 60 years. Unit 1 is currently licensed to operate through Dec. 20, 2033; Unit 2 through June 

28, 2034; and Unit 3 through July 2, 2036. 

The NRC staff is reviewing the application to determine if it has sufficient information to 

begin the agency’s detailed safety and environmental reviews. If the application is determined to 

be acceptable for review and docketing, the staff will then publish a notice of opportunity for the 

public to request a hearing before the NRC’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board. 

Information about the license renewal process is available on the NRC website. A copy 

of the Browns Ferry subsequent license renewal application also will be available at the Athens - 

Limestone County Public Library, 603 S. Jefferson St. in Athens, Alabama.
No. 89-6425.

#### Flanagan *v.*United States Parole Commission et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Allegro Biodiesel Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, W.
Bruce Comer III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.§ 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      W. Bruce Comer IIIW.
      Bruce Comer IIIChief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal
              Financial
      and Accounting Officer)October
      22, 2008




A signed
original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

No. III-00-13 March 6, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO DISCUSS CLINTON INSPECTION FINDINGS

**Regional Administrator to Hold Press Conference Following Meeting**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with AmerGen Energy Co. officials

Friday, March 10, to discuss the findings of an NRC team inspection evaluating plant operations at the

Clinton Nuclear Power Station.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held at 10 a.m. CST in the utility’s Energy

and Environmental Center on Illinois Highway 54 east of Clinton, Illinois.

NRC Regional Administrator James Dyer will hold a press conference in the Energy and

Environmental Center after meeting with the utility.

NRC and AmerGen representatives will discuss the findings of the Operational Safety Team

Inspection, which is an in-depth team inspection that evaluates the performance of the plant’s staff and

operations. The inspection involves continuous observation in the plant’s control room as well as

other aspects of plant operation.

Clinton’s Unit 1 was shut down in September 1996 for performance improvement activities and

modifications. It resumed operation last May. The NRC scheduled this inspection to check the plant’s

progress after it had been operating for a number of months. The inspection began February 22 and

will end March 10.

NRC and utility representatives also will discuss AmerGen’s five-year strategic plan at the

March 10 meeting.

#####
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-22495-RNS

SAMUEL HERNANDEZ, RICHARD 

MONTOURE, and MARCY BROOKS on 

behalf of themselves and all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

EVENT ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.,

Defendant. /

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs Samuel Hernandez 

and Richard Montoure voluntarily dismiss all of their claims with prejudice. This dismissal is on 

an individual basis only, without prejudice to any claims of any other putative class members, and 

is being filed prior to the filing of any motion for class certification. Therefore, neither Court 

approval nor notice to the class is required.

With this dismissal, all claims as to all parties in this matter have been disposed of and this 

matter can be closed in its entirety. 

Case 1:20-cv-22495-RNS Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

Dated: August 18, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

/s/Adam M. Schachter

ADAM M. SCHACHTER

Florida Bar No. 647101

aschachter@gsgpa.com

GELBER SCHACHTER & GREENBERG, P.A. 

SunTrust International Center 

One Southeast Third Avenue, Suite 2600

Miami, Florida 33131

Telephone: (305) 728-0950

E-service: efilings@gsgpa.com

Bryan L. Clobes (pro hac vice)

CAFFERTY CLOBES MERIWETHER 

& SPRENGEL LLP 

205 N. Monroe St. 

Media, PA 19063

Telephone: (215) 864-2800

Facsimile: (215) 964-2808

Email: bclobes@caffertyclobes.com

Daniel O. Herrera (pro hac vice)

CAFFERTY CLOBES MERIWETHER 

& SPRENGEL LLP 

150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 3000

Chicago, Illinois 60606

Telephone: (312)782-4880

Facsimile: (312)782-7785

Email: dherrera@caffertyclobes.com

Joseph G. Sauder (pro hac vice)

SAUDER SCHELKOPF LLC

1109 Lancaster Ave.

Berwyn, PA 19312

Telephone: (888) 711-9975

Facsimile: (610) 421-1326

Email: jgs@sstriallawyers.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 1:20-cv-22495-RNS Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2021 Page 2 of 2