alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
****

****

**Exhibit 31(ii)**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

	I,  Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial Officer of Tayco Developments, Inc., certify that:

        1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tayco Developments, Inc.;

        2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

        3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

        4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))  [omitted]  for the small business issuer and have:

                (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

                (b)	[NOT REQUIRED]

                (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and

                (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer'sinternal control over financial reporting; and

        5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and theaudit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

                (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

                (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
Editorial Note on Part 121
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 121 appear at 72 FR 50039 and 50040, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 121.512 What is the size standard for stockpile purchases? A concern is small for this purpose if: ( a ) It is primarily engaged in the purchase of materials which are not domestic products; and
( b ) Its annual receipts, together with its affiliates, do not exceed $76.5 million.
[61 FR 3286, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 3056, Jan. 23, 2002; 70 FR 72594, Dec. 6, 2005; 73 FR 41254, July 18, 2008; 79 FR 33669, June 12, 2014; 84 FR 34281, July 18, 2019; 87 FR 69154, Nov. 17, 2022]
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.645 Redemption of Certificates. ( a ) *Redemption of Individual Certificate.* The prepayment of the underlying loan or a default on such loan will trigger the redemption of the Certificate by FTA/SBA in accordance with the procedures prescribed in the SPGA.
( b ) *Redemption of Pool Certificate.* The FTA and SBA may redeem a Pool Certificate because of prepayment or default of all loans in a Pool.
#### § 3202.11 Must I prove I am qualified to hold a lease when filing an application to lease?

You do not need to submit proof that you are qualified to hold a lease under § 3202.10 at the time you submit an application to lease, but BLM may ask you in writing for information about your qualifications at any time. You must submit the additional information to BLM within 30 days after you receive the request.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-11419

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cv-00143-CDL

RENASANT BANK INC.,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EARTHRESOURCES OF FRANKLIN COUNTY LLC,

JOHN F. SMITHGALL,

 Defendants - Appellants.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

________________________

(September 6, 2017)

Before WILSON, MARTIN, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 17-11419 Date Filed: 09/06/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Renasant Bank sued EarthResources of Franklin County and John F. 

Smithgall to enforce a promissory note and personal guaranty. The district court 

entered judgment against EarthResources and Smithgall in 2013, and our court 

affirmed. Renasant Bank, Inc. v. Earth Res. of Franklin Cty., LLC, 537 F. App’x 

889 (11th Cir. 2013) (per curiam). In 2017, EarthResources and Smithgall, 

pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, filed with the 

district court a motion for relief from final judgment and a motion to reopen 

discovery. The district court denied the motions. 

EarthResources and Smithgall now appeal, arguing that the district court 

abused its discretion in denying the motions. After careful consideration of the 

record and the parties’ briefs, however, we find no reversible error. 

EarthResources and Smithgall have not “demonstrate[d] a justification so 

compelling that the district court was required to vacate its” judgment. See Cano 

v. Baker, 435 F.3d 1337, 1342 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam) (internal quotation 

marks omitted) (discussing the “heavy” burden a party has on appeal when it is 

challenging a district court’s denial of Rule 60(b) relief).

AFFIRMED.1

 1 Renasant’s motion for damages and costs for frivolous appeal is DENIED.

Case: 17-11419 Date Filed: 09/06/2017 Page: 2 of 2
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5114 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide training for Department of Homeland Security personnel regarding the use of containment 

devices to prevent exposure to potential synthetic opioids, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2022 

Mr. BROWN (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. 

PADILLA, Mr. WICKER, Mr. TESTER, and Mr. MARKEY) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide 

training for Department of Homeland Security personnel 

regarding the use of containment devices to prevent exposure to potential synthetic opioids, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevent Exposure to 

5 Narcotics and Toxins Act of 2022’’ or the ‘‘PREVENT 

6 Act of 2022’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5114 IS

1 SEC. 2. TRAINING REGARDING THE USE OF CONTAINMENT 

2 DEVICES TO PREVENT POTENTIAL SYN3 THETIC OPIOID EXPOSURE. 

4 (a) TRAINING.—Section 416(b)(1) of the Homeland 

5 Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 216(b)(1)) is amended by 

6 adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(C) How to use containment devices to 

8 prevent potential synthetic opioid exposure.’’. 

9 (b) AVAILABILITY OF CONTAINMENT DEVICES.—Sec10 tion 416(c) of such Act (6 U.S.C. 216(c)) is amended— 

11 (1) in the subsection heading, by inserting ‘‘, 

12 CONTAINMENT DEVICES,’’ after ‘‘EQUIPMENT’’; and 

13 (2) by striking ‘‘and opioid receptor antago14 nists, including naloxone’’ and inserting ‘‘, opioid re15 ceptor antagonists, including naloxone, and contain16 ment devices’’. 

17 (c) APPLICABILITY TO OTHER COMPONENTS.—If the 

18 Secretary of Homeland Secretary determines that officers, 

19 agents, other personnel, or canines of a component of the 

20 Department of Homeland Security other than U.S. Cus21 toms and Border Protection are at risk of potential syn22 thetic opioid exposure in the course of their duties, the 

23 head of such component shall carry out the responsibilities 

24 under section 416 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

25 (6 U.S.C. 216) in the same manner and to the same deVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:10 Nov 19, 2022 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S5114.IS S5114

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 5114 IS

1 gree as the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border 

2 Protection carries out such responsibilities. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

Case Number: 20-22744-CIV-MORENO

JUAN CRENA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

NAVITELIA INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER

DENYING ALL PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with 

Prejudice (D.E. 4), filed on July 13, 2020. 

THE COURT has considered the notice and the pertinent portions of the record, and is 

otherwise fully advised in the premises. It is

ADJUDGED that this Cause is DISMISSED with prejudice. See FED. R. CIV. P. 

41(a)(1)(A)(i). Further, all pending motions are DENIED as MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 16th of July 2020.

______________________________________

FEDERICO A. MORENO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-22744-FAM Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2020 Page 1 of 1
Document

Acceptance Certificate


1.    Contrail Aviation Leasing, LLC. ("Buyer") hereby acknowledges that on 30 March 2021, at 0126 hours (GMT) at Macau Intl. Airport it accepted delivery of one used IAE V2530-A5 aircraft engine bearing manufacturer's serial number V10150 manufactured by IAE International Aero Engines AG (the “Engine”) pursuant to the terms of an engine purchase agreement dated 26 March 2021, made between Buyer and Engine Lease Finance Corporation. 
2.    Buyer confirms that it has accepted delivery of the Engine in "as is where is" condition.


Dated 30 March 2021


SIGNED by                
for and on behalf of                
Contrail Aviation Leasing, LLC.




/s/ Joseph G. Kuhn     
Joseph G. Kuhn, CEO
§ 423.32 Hunting, fishing, and trapping. ( a ) You may hunt, fish, and trap in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws, and subject to the restrictions of § 423.30, in areas where both of the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The area is not closed to public use under subpart B of this part 423; and
( 2 ) The area has not been otherwise designated by an authorized official in a special use area under subpart E of this part 423.
( b ) You must comply with any additional restrictions pertaining to hunting, fishing, and trapping established by an authorized official in a special use area under subpart E of this part 423.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 64

**Question 64:** The following question relates to the requirements of 10 CFR 20.2104 (a) (2), 10 CFR 20.2104 (c), and 20.2104 (d) concerning records of lifetime cumulative occupational dose. Assuming that (1) the licensee has obtained, by electronic media, a printed report (or reports) containing the Form 4 information on an individual's lifetime cumulative dose, (2) the individual who received the dose signed Form 4, or equivalent, in accordance with 10 CFR 20.2104 (d), and (3) there is no other signature attesting to the authenticity of the Form 4 record. Is the licensee in compliance with the requirements in 10 CFR 20.2104 concerning records of lifetime cumulative occupational dose?

**Answer:** Yes. As stated in Regulatory Guide 8.7, Section C.1.3, to demonstrate compliance with the requirement of 10 CFR 20.2104 (a) (2) (to attempt to obtain the records of lifetime cumulative occupational radiation dose), the individual to be monitored may provide a written estimate of the cumulative lifetime dose or an up-to-date NRC Form 4 signed by the individual. This information does not need to be verified so long as the individual does not participate in a planned special exposure. However, in the unlikely event that it was the individual who provided the licensee with the report by electronic media, Regulatory Guide 8.7, Section C.1.3, also states that "Although not required by the regulations, it is considered good health physics practice to verify the information provided by the individual."

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.2104)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, December 13, 2017
HomeAbout NRCCareer OpportunitiesOpportunitiesCareer Paths

# Explore Careers at NRC

Welcome to the NRC’s “Employee Journey” site. The purpose of this site is to provide applicants an opportunity to explore career paths at the agency. The positions below have been identified as having future workforce gaps over the next five years.

The goal of the Employee Journey site is to:
        - Engage potential applicants;
        - Improve career planning capabilities and align applicant expectations with agency needs; and
        - Improve applicant understanding of requirements for various positions.

Please check back in the future as we add more positions to the Employee Journey site!

The following disciplines are currently included in the Employee Journey site:

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 09, 2022
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 27, 2010 

y0419 

Order 

 

April 27, 2010 

140337 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140337 

 COA: 286549 

Macomb CC: 2007-005626-FH 

ROBERT EDWARD TATMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 24, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.1012 The record.

Where relevant, the provisions of § 134.225 apply. In a protest under this subpart, the contents of the record also include the case file or solicitation submitted to OHA in accordance with § 134.1007.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-51124

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BILLY RAY WHEELOCK,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:92-CR-128-1

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Defendant-Appellant Billy Ray Wheelock appeals the district court’s denial

of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. In his § 3582(c)(2)

motion, Wheelock asserts that he is eligible for a sentence reduction based on

Amendments 591, 706, and 715 to the Sentencing Guidelines.

Wheelock was sentenced to a statutorily-mandated term of life

imprisonment on his conviction for conspiracy to distribute more than 50 grams

of crack cocaine because he committed that offense following two or more prior

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 13, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-51124 Document: 00511202761 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/13/2010
No. 09-51124

convictions for a felony drug offense. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). Because,

pursuant to our decision in United States v. Carter, 595 F.3d 575, 577-81 (5th

Cir. 2010), Wheelock was subject to a statutorily-mandated sentence that

exceeded the guideline range, he was ineligible for a sentence reduction under

§ 3582(c)(2), regardless of any retroactive amendments affecting that guideline

range.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED; the

government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED; and its alternative

motion for an extension of time is DENIED as moot.

2

Case: 09-51124 Document: 00511202761 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/13/2010
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22971]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by November 
15, 2004.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Application for former Spouse Payments 
From Retired Pay; DD Form 2293; OMB Control Number 0730-0008.
    Type of Request: Revision.
    Number of Respondents: 23,481.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 23,481.
    Average Burden Per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 5,870.
    Needs and Uses: Under 10 U.S.C. 1408, State courts may divide 
military retired pay as property or order alimony and child support 
payments from that retired pay. The former spouse may apply to the 
Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) for direct payment of 
these monies by using DD Form 2293. This information collection is 
needed to provide DFAS the basic data needed to process the request.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jacqueline Zeiher.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Zeiher at the Officer of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/ESCD/Information Management 
Division, 1225 South Clark Street, Suite 504, Arlington, VA 22202-4326.

    Dated: October 5, 2004.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-22971 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. ------------

21 u.s.c. § 846 

21 u.s.c. § 853 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

vs. 

LEONARD SHEMTOB and 

STRONG SUPPLEMENTS LLC, 

Defendants. 

----------------

INFORMATION 

The United States Attorney charges that: 

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 

1. Anabolic steroids are synthetic variations of the male sex hormone testosterone,

which is produced naturally in the human body. Anabolic steroids can produce anabolic and 

androgenic effects. "Anabolic" effects relate to the increase and growth of muscle and bone mass. 

"Androgenic" effects relate to the development of male reproductive organs and characteristics. 

Anabolic steroids can be misused and cause harm to the body. Misuse of anabolic steroids may 

lead to serious, even permanent, health problems, such as kidney failure, liver damage, high blood 

pressure, and increases in blood cholesterol. 

Defendants 

2. Defendant, LEONARD SHEMTOB, was a California resident who owned and

controlled co-defendant STRONG SUPPLEMENTS LLC. 

20-80049-CR-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN

Jun 19, 2020

Case 9:20-cr-80049-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2020 Page 1 of 8

JA
Case 9:20-cr-80049-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2020 Page 2 of 8
Case 9:20-cr-80049-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2020 Page 3 of 8
Case 9:20-cr-80049-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2020 Page 4 of 8
Case 9:20-cr-80049-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2020 Page 5 of 8
Case 9:20-cr-80049-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2020 Page 6 of 8
Case 9:20-cr-80049-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2020 Page 7 of 8
Case 9:20-cr-80049-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2020 Page 8 of 8