alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Steven M. Belote, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Shore Financial Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                                                            
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 20, 2006 |  | /s/    STEVEN M.
BELOTE                                    
|                     |  | Steven M. Belote Chief Financial Officer and Vice President



77
### §6316. Payment by foreign currency

The Secretary is authorized in his discretion to allow payment of taxes in the currency of a foreign country under such circumstances and subject to such conditions as the Secretary may by regulations prescribe.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 778; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" in two places.
#### Germaine Guntzer, Respondent, v. County of Westchester, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The following question is certified: Was the order of the County Court of Westchester County properly made? Motion for a stay pending the appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Motion for an extension of time to serve an answer granted, and defendant’s time extended until twenty days after.the disposition of the appeal by the Court of Appeals. Present — Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*pp. 902, 966.]
#### Samuel V. Diaper, Respondent, v. Joseph Paterno, Jr., Appellant.

Order unanimously modified by reinstating the second defense as a complete defense and by reinstating the third defense as a partial defense, and as so modified affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Do opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
# MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Product Name: ICYNENE MD-C-200 TM

Page 1 of 2 (F) Spray ICYNENE MD-C-200 TM 6747 Campobello Rd., Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L7, Canada Tel: 905.363.4040 Toll Free: 800.758.7325 Fax: 905.363.0102



### Section 1: Chemical, Product and Company Information

Product Name: ICYNENE MD-C-200 TM

ICYNENE MD-C-200 TM is a trademark of Icynene Inc.

Product Use: SPRAY-ON CELLULAR PLASTIC INSULATION
Product Code: Not Applicable
Revision Date: November 28, 2010



### Section 2: Ingredient Information
Ingredients (% w/v, unless otherwise noted) Cas No: Wt.%:
(BASE SEAL ® ), Component A CAS# 009016-87-9 50 % by volume (ICYNENE MD-C-200 TM ), Resin Component B 50 % by volume



### Section 3: PHYSICAL DATA
Appearance: Solubility In Water: Density: Semi-rigid polyurethane foam
Insoluble.
2.0 lbs./cubic foot

Odour: None
Emissions: Safe for occupancy after 24 hrs, no emissions detectable after 30 days.



### Section 4: FIRE & EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA Flammability: Combustion occurs at 400 ° F (material will not sustain combustion on its own) Flame Spread: Less than 25 Smoke Developed: Less than 450

Method Used: ASTM E84 Melting: Does not melt

Flammable Limits: LFL: - not determined UFL: - not determined Extinguishing Media: Water, carbon dioxide, dry chemical or foam.
Fire & Explosion Hazards: Prevent breathing of combustion fumes (smoke)
Fire Fighting Equipment: Firefighters must wear a self-contained breathing ap paratus to avoid breathing smoke generated by combustion.

# MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Product Name: ICYNENE MD-C-200 TM

Page 2 of 2 (F) Spray ICYNENE MD-C-200 TM 

### Section 5: REACTIVITY DATA
Stability: Stable under all normal conditions Incompatibility: Compatible with all products 

### Section 6: ENVIRONMENTAL & DISPOSAL INFORMATION
Disposal Method: Follow all federal, provincial, state and local regu lations. 

### Section 7: HEALTH HAZARD DATA

Detectable Emissions: No detectable emissions Systemic & Other Effects: Not available Ingestion: The consequences of ingestion of large amounts are un known
Dust Inhalation: May cause mechanical irritation to the respiratory syste m Eye Protection: Use glasses when cutting foam
Skin Protection: Dust from foam cutting may cause irritation 

### Section 8: FIRST AID
Ingestion: Medical advice should be obtained
Inhalation: Remove to fresh air, consult a physician Eye Contact: Flush with water to remove particles
Skin Contact: No special precautions required 

### Section 9: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS GIVEN IN GOOD FAITH, BUT NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IS MADE. CONTACT ICYNENE INC. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.
No: I-24-006 April 15, 2024 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC Issues Order Imposing Fine to Puerto Rico Firm

for Violation Involving Nuclear Gauge and Decommissioning

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued an order imposing a $17,500 civil penalty 

against a Puerto Rico firm for failing to dispose of or transfer a portable nuclear gauge and complete 

decommissioning of its site within the required time period.

Almonte Geo Services Group, based in Toa Alta, was licensed by the NRC to own and 

possess portable gauges containing small amounts of radioactive material. The gauges are used for 

such purposes as measuring the density of soil at construction sites. The NRC determined that the 

company initiated decommissioning in December 2019, and, under agency requirements, should 

have completed the process within 24 months. 

In an inspection report issued in June 2023, the NRC documented the apparent violation and 

proposed the fine in November 2023. The NRC is considering additional civil penalties since 

Almonte has not addressed the violation. 

The NRC has verified that the gauge is being properly secured at Almonte’s facility to 

prevent unauthorized access or removal.
HomeAbout NRCPrivacy Program

# File a Privacy Complaint

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) takes your privacy seriously and has created a process by which you can formally file a complaint about NRC privacy practices.

### Privacy complaints we can help with:

We accept written complaints about:
        - How the NRC collects or uses personal information;
        - How, when, and with whom the NRC shares personal information;
        - The type(s) and/or amount of personal information the NRC collects; and
        - Any other concern(s) you may have about how the NRC handles personal information and/or its impact(s) on personal privacy.

Please keep in mind that this privacy complaints process is not intended to cover requests submitted by or on behalf of an individual under the Privacy Act of 1974 for access to, or amendment or correction of, Privacy Act records about that individual. Filing a privacy complaint does not negate or replace (1) your right to request access, amendment, or correction of Privacy Act records or (2) your right to seek judicial relief under the Privacy Act or other federal laws for violations of individual privacy rights.

### Submit a privacy complaint:

To submit a complaint, you may send an email to privacy.resource@nrc.gov and include:
        - Your name
        - A summary of your complaint or a written description of the specific circumstances
        - A summary of other steps already taken, if any, by you or the NRC in an attempt to resolve this complaint
        - A preferred method of contact about your complaint – a mailing address, telephone number, email address or fax number

Or you may use the following online form:

Privacy Complaint Form

## Evaluation Procedure

        - We will send you an acknowledgement letter within 10 business days of our receipt of your complaint. 
        - If we determine that the complaint does not fall within the scope of this privacy complaint process, we will let you know, and, if appropriate, we will refer the complaint to the correct people within the NRC.
        - If the complaint is within the scope of this privacy complaint process, the Privacy Officer will review the complaint and provide a recommendation to the SAOP on any actions to take in response to the complaint. 
        - Once the SAOP has considered the recommendation and makes a decision, we will inform you of any actions we will be taking in response to the complaint.
        - Our goal is to review and determine a course of action in response to a complaint within 60 business days. For complaints that require more time, we’ll contact you to provide a status update.

If you have questions about this privacy complaint process, please contact us by email at privacy.resource@nrc.gov.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, January 19, 2024

#### Related Information

            - Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act
            - About us

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, January 19, 2024
### [§1044. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §13313(a), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2133]

Section, added Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13114(a), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 430; amended Pub. L. 104–188, title I, §1703(a), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1875, related to rollover of publicly traded securities gain into specialized small business investment companies.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to sales after Dec. 31, 2017, see section 13313(c) of Pub. L. 115–97, set out as an Effective Date of 2017 Amendment note under section 1016 of this title.
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 15

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

         We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated financial statements of
Skynet Telematics.com, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2001 and for the
three months then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the company's management.

         Another accountant reviewed the interim financial information of
Netking Limited and Subsidiary and Skamp International Limited, subsidiaries of
the Company, whose combined total assets as of March 31, 2001 and whose revenues
for the three-months then ended which constituted substantially all of the
consolidated totals.

         We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

         Based on our review and the report of the other accountant, we are not
aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying
consolidated financial statements for them to be in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.



June 22, 2001                            By: /s/ Most Horowitz & Company, LLP
                                        -------------------------------------
                                         Most Horowitz & Company, LLP
#### John Dobranski, by Anna Dobranski, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, v. “John Doe,” as President of the Cooks, Countermen, Soda Dispensers and Assistants Union, Local No. 325, Appellant.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
#### Reynolds Metals Company, Respondent, v. A. B. C. Steel Equipment Co., Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, James F. Verhey, Chief Financial Officer of Kaiser Ventures LLC (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1. The amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                               
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: December 2, 2004 |  | /s/ James F. Verhey           
|                       |  | James F. Verhey               
|                       |  | Executive Vice President & CFO



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4050 — Goldman Sachs/Cinven/Ahlsell)

(2006/C 20/12)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 6 January 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 61030)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 522b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, SNRP Site Visit.                    

*Date:*                         October 14-15, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hotel El Convento, 100 Cristo Street, Old San Juan, PR 00901.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Phillip F. Wiethorn, Scientific Review Administrator, DHHS/NIH/NINDS/DER/SRB, 6001 Executive Boulevard; MSC 9529, Neuroscience Center; Room 3203, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, (301) 496-5388,                         *wiethorp@ninds.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle. 

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 5, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-22996  Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Phenoxy

But yl Acrylate GC - MS May 8, 2013 Tianzhi Zhang 7 

## GC **- MS**
§ 8365.2-5 Public health, safety and comfort. On developed recreation sites and areas, unless otherwise authorized, no person shall: ( a ) Discharge or use firearms, other weapons, or fireworks; or
( b ) Bring an animal, except a Seeing Eye or Hearing Ear dog, to a swimming area.

Group 8600—Environmental Education and Protection [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of TransAlta Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen G. Snyder, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 
| 1.     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange   Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                            |
| 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all   materials respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the   Company.        |

 

 

 
| /s/   Stephen G. Snyder                 |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen   G. Snyder                     |   |
| President   and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                    |   |
| Dated:   August 25, 2011.          |   |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
7300 N. Kendall Drive, Suite 450, Miami, FL 33156

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:20-CV-22430-ALTONAGA/GOODMAN

MARIA ELENA CHAVEZ LETONA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MARIA HOME CARE CORP, 

JENNIFER QUINTAS, and 

LESBIA ANZOATEGUI,

Defendants.

______________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff, MARIA ELENA CHAVEZ LETONA, notifies the Court that the parties have 

settled their dispute and are in the process of negotiating and executing the written Settlement

Agreement.

Dated this 15th day of September 2020.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq. (174742)

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

7300 N. Kendall Drive

Suite 450

Miami, FL 33156

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:20-cv-22430-JG Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/15/2020 Page 1 of 1
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

February 10, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00093-CV

IN RE PAOLA ACHA, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1196257

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Friday, February 10, 2023, relator Paola Acha filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. 

App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Jeffrey 

T. Kovach, presiding judge of the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris

County, to “reverse the default judgment. . . .” Relator asserts that the trial court 

abused its discretion by “recklessly issuing a Wrongful Eviction Judgment and an 
2

Illegal Writ of Possession without consideration to the lawful subsidized Rent 

Funds granted by the state of Texas Rent Relief Fund.”

Relator has not established that it she entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Wilson.
### §138. Terms abolished

The district court shall not hold formal terms.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 897; Pub. L. 88–139, §1, Oct. 16, 1963, 77 Stat. 248.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

This section was substituted for a number of special provisions fixing stated times for holding terms of court in the several districts, in order to vest in the courts wider discretion and promote greater efficiency in the administration of the business of such courts.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1963—Pub. L. 88–139 substituted "The district court shall not hold formal terms" for "The times for holding regular terms of court at the places fixed by this chapter shall be determined by rule of the district court" in text, and "Terms abolished" for "Times for holding regular terms" in section catchline.