alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 6/30/98
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001043102
<NAME> CHANCELLOR MEDIA CORPORATION OF LOS ANGELES
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          14,257
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  303,116
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,775
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               336,986
<PP&E>                                         228,036
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,258
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,403,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          160,211
<BONDS>                                      2,278,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          119,445
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,403,377
<SALES>                                        555,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               555,267
<CGS>                                           70,744
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  586,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,085
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,316
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,784
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,468)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 31,865
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (60,035)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[109th Congress Public Law 15]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ015.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 337]]

Public Law 109-15
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  215 Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard in Madison, Wisconsin, as the 
 ``Robert M. La Follette, Sr. Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: June 17, 
                         2005 -  [H.R. 1760]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 215 
Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard in Madison, Wisconsin, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Robert M. La Follette, Sr. Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert M. La Follette, Sr. 
Post Office Building''.

    Approved June 17, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1760:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            May 16, considered and passed House.
            May 26, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 27 October 2005

in Case C-329/03 Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arios Pagos (Greece), Trapeza tis Ellados AE v Banque Artesia (1)

(Free movement of capital - First Council Directive of 11 May 1960 - Acquisition of bonds dealt in on a stock exchange - Repatriation of the proceeds of their liquidation)

(2005/C 330/04)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-329/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Arios Pagos (Greece), made by decision of 31 March 2003, received at the Court on 28 July 2003, in the proceedings pending before that court between Trapeza tis Ellados AE and Banque Artesia — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric, K. Schiemann, E. Juhász and M. Ilešič (Rapporteur), Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General, L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 27 October 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

----

(1)OJ C 239 of 04.10.2003.

----
### §454. Practice of law by justices and judges

Any justice or judge appointed under the authority of the United States who engages in the practice of law is guilty of a high misdemeanor.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 908.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §373 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §258, 36 Stat. 1161).

Changes in phraseology were made.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Vicksburg
National Military Park
MS, LA


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  South Carolina Memorial
 South Carolina MemorialSouth Carolina Memorial NPS ImageThe South Carolina State Memorial is located in front of Vicksburg High School on former park property along south Confederate Avenue in the City of Vicksburg. The memorial was constructed of Winnsboro South Carolina Granite and dedicated November 22, 1935. It was sponsored by the South Carolina United Daughters of the Confederacy (U.D.C.) and cost $4900. South Carolina had eleven commands in the Campaign and Defense of Vicksburg, all of which were in Johnston's Army.
 Last updated: April 14, 2015
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 3201 Clay Street
Vicksburg,
MS
39183
 Phone: 601 636-0583 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
# Euroopa Liidu C 18A/25.

| | ISSN 1725-5171 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 18A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 49. köide25. jaanuar 2006 |

ISSN 1725-5171

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 18A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

49. köide25. jaanuar 2006

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Teatised |
| | Euroopa Toiduohutusamet |
| 2006/C 018A/1 | Konkurss Euroopa Toiduohutusameti teaduskomitee ja teaduskomisjonide liikmete kohale. Konkursil osalemise avalduse esitamise tähtpäev on edasi lükatud 2006. aasta 17. veebruarile | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

III   Teatised

Euroopa Toiduohutusamet

2006/C 018A/1

Konkurss Euroopa Toiduohutusameti teaduskomitee ja teaduskomisjonide liikmete kohale. Konkursil osalemise avalduse esitamise tähtpäev on edasi lükatud 2006. aasta 17. veebruarile

1

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

III Teatised

Euroopa Toiduohutusamet

| 25.1.2006 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 18/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2006

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 18/1

---

KONKURSS EUROOPA TOIDUOHUTUSAMETI TEADUSKOMITEE JA TEADUSKOMISJONIDE LIIKMETE KOHALE

Konkursil osalemise avalduse esitamise tähtpäev on edasi lükatud 2006. aasta 17. veebruarile

(2006/C 18 A/01)

Avalduste esitamise tähtpäev oli 2006. aasta 7. jaanuar, nagu avaldati
  Euroopa Liidu Teatajas (ELT C 289 A, 22.11.2005, lk 6). Ent elektrooniliselt saadetud avaldustega korduvalt ilmnenud probleemide tõttu, eriti viimasel nädalal enne tähtpäeva, on avalduste esitamise tähtpäev lükatud edasi 2006. aasta 17. veebruarile.

Käesolev konkurss on mõeldud teadlastele, kes soovivad olla Euroopa Toiduohutusameti teaduskomitee või teaduskomisjoni liikmed. Euroopa Toiduohutusamet loodi Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 28. jaanuari 2002. aasta määrusega (EÜ) nr 178/2002, millega sätestatakse toidualaste õigusnormide üldised põhimõtted ja nõuded, asutatakse Euroopa Toiduohutusamet ja kehtestatakse toidu ohutusega seotud menetlused. Ameti alaline asukoht on Itaalias Parmas.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2




                           CERTIFICATION BY CONTROLLER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of EntreMed, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dane R. Saglio, as Controller of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

        This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Controller of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any
person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.


August 14, 2002                            /s/ Dane R Saglio
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Dane R. Saglio
                                           Controller
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 6, 2013

h1105 

# Order

Clerk November 6, 2013

146478

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146478

COA: 307758

St. Clair CC: 06

- 001700

- FC

RAYMOND CURTIS CARP,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, leave to appeal having been granted in this case, the

time allowed for oral argument shall be 20 min utes for each side. MCR 7.315(B). We

invite the State Appellate Defender Office to participate in oral argument by sharing time

with counsel for the defendant.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 1:20-CV-21254-BLOOM/LOUIS

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

JUSTIN W. KEENER D/B/A JMJ 

FINANCIAL,

Defendant.

DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF STRIKING [DE 70]

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant Justin Keener d/b/a JMJ Financial, by and 

through its undersigned counsel, hereby files its Notice of Striking [DE 70].

Dated: August 14, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP

/s/Benjamin G. Greenberg______

Benjamin G. Greenberg 

Florida Bar No. 192732

333 SE 2nd Avenue Suite 4400

Miami, FL 33131

Telephone: (305) 579-0850

Facsimile: (305) 579-0717

greenbergb@gtlaw.com

BUCKLEY LLP

 

Christopher F. Regan (pro hac vice)

Veena Viswanatha (pro hac vice)

Adam Miller (pro hac vice)

2001 M Street NW, Suite 500

Washington, DC 20036

Case 1:20-cv-21254-BB Document 74 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2021 Page 1 of 3
2

Telephone: (202) 349-8000

Facsimile: (202) 349-8080

cregan@buckleyfirm.com

vviswanatha@buckleyfirm.com

amiller@buckleyfirm.com

Counsel for Defendant Justin W. Keener

Case 1:20-cv-21254-BB Document 74 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2021 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this day served via ECF a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

Notice of Striking [DE70] to the following:

Joshua E. Braunstein (Special Bar No. A5502640)

Antony Richard Petrilla (Special Bar No. A5502641)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

100 F Street NE

Washington, DC 20549

Telephone: (202) 551-8470

Braunsteinj@sec.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

This, the 14th day of August, 2021

/s/ Benjamin G. Greenberg

Benjamin G. Greenberg

Case 1:20-cv-21254-BB Document 74 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2021 Page 3 of 3
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0622

_________________ IN THE MATTER OF: S.M., A Youth in Need of Care. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Robert J . Whelan, District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 27 2022

07/27/2022
Case Number: DA 21-0622
#### § 109.460 Prohibition on sales of ILP Intermediary Loans to Eligible Small Business Concerns.

An ILP Intermediary may not sell all or any portion of a loan made to an Eligible Small Business Concern without prior written consent from the AA/CA or designee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1995
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        1000
<OTHER-SE>                      (1000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0
                                

</TABLE>
#### FREDERICK EQUITY EXCHANGE, Respondent, v. SMITH et al, Appellants.

(196 N. W. 297.)

(File No. 5501.

Opinion filed December 21, 1923.)

1. Appeal and! Error — Findings—Findings Not Disturbed Unless Against Preponderance of Evidence.

Trial court’s findings will not be disturbed unless against clear preponderance of evidence.

2. Partnership — Evidence—Finding that Partnership Existed Warranted.

In an action against two defendants sued as partners for the value of the goods sold them, evidence that they were members of an equity exchange under a firm name, and the fact that the partnership was not denied until one of the alleged partners met with financial reverses and gave a bill of sale of his interest to the other, held to warrant a finding that a partnership existed.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brown County; Hon. Robert D. Gardner, Judge.

Action by the Frederick Equity Exchange against George Smith and James Contwell, copartners doing business under the firm' name of Smith & Cantwell. From judgment for plaintiff and order denying new trial, Cantwell appeals.

Judgment and order affirmed.

*Van Slyke & Agor,*of Aberdeen,'for Appellant.

*Thomas L. Arnold,*of Aberdeen, for Respondent.

(1) To point one of the opinion, Respondent cited: Karlsson v. Odland (S. D1.), 192 N. W. 758; Steensland1 v. Noel, 28 S. D. 522, 134 N. W. 207.

GATE'S, J.

This is an action to' recover the value of goods, wares and merchandise sold by plaintiff to defendants as partners. The defendant Smith had departed from the state and was not served with process. The defendant Cantwell denied the partnership and alleged that the mlerchandi'Se sold was sold to Smith on his individual account in his threshing business in which Cantwell was not interested. The court found for the plaintiff. From the judgment and order denying new trial, defendant Cantwell appeals.

*138[i, 2] It would serve no useful purpose-to state the facts, because no legal principle is involved. The question is solely one of fact. We cannot say from :a careful examination of the evidence as disclosed1 in the briefs, and especially from the added facts brought out .in respondent's brief, that the clear preponderance of the evidence was contrary to- the findings of the trial court. Among the facts that warranted the court in finding that there was a partnership was the fact that defendants were members of respondent under the name of Smith & Cantwell, and among the items of evidence warranting the finding for respondent there was testimony tending to show that appellant knew that the items of the account were charged to the firm and that he made no complaint thereof until after Smith- -had met with financial reverses and had given a bill of sale of his partnership interest to appellant.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 196 N. W. 297. See, Headnote (1), American Key-Numbered Digest, Appeal and error, Key-No. 1012(1), 4 C. J. Sec. 2857; (2) Partnership, Key-No. 55, 30 Cyc. 415.
§ 4300.71 Under what circumstances can BLM modify, reduce or cancel my permit? ( a ) BLM may cancel the permit if: ( 1 ) BLM issued it improperly through error as to a material fact;
( 2 ) You fail to comply with any of the provisions of the permit or the regulations of this part; or
( 3 ) Disposal, withdrawal, natural causes, such as drought or fire, or any other reason in § 4300.50 so requires.
( b ) BLM will not cancel the permit for failure to comply until BLM has notified you in writing of the nature of your noncompliance, and you have been given at least 30 days to show why BLM should not cancel your permit.
( c ) BLM may modify or reduce a permit in accordance with § 4300.50.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John De Bello, Appellant, against John F. Foster, as Warden of Auburn State Prison, Respondent.

Present — Taylor, P. J., Love, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
| 1.   | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Trust Certificates (TRUCs), Series 2001-2 Trust; |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the trust agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and the trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |                                            |   |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   | By: /s/ Anthony J. Horan                        |   |
|   |   |   | Name:  Anthony J. Horan                    |   |
|   |   |   | Title:  Chief Executive Officer/President, |   |
|   |   |   | Bear Stearns Depositor Inc.                     |   |
|   |   |   | Date:   March 13, 2012           |   |

----
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 414

**Question 414:** This question refers to the answer to Question 6 §20.1201. This answer does not directly answer the implied question, which is, "if a person is assessed a history of 5 rem or more for the current year, is that person permitted to receive any occupational dose?"

Implied in the answer is that if monitoring is not required, that person can receive an occupational dose, presumably up to 500 mrem for an adult. Conceptually, this is not consistent with normal protection standards, i.e., "if you don't measure it, it is not there" is not a normally accepted practice.

The Commission allowance for an explicit 100 mrem (SECY-90-387, November 26, 1990) would seem a much more reasonable approach. Both of these positions appear to conflict with the answer to Question 113 in the third set. Hopefully, a position similar to that taken for the declared pregnant woman with a pre-existing dose history will be taken. That is, an additional small increment of exposure is not biologically significant.

**Answer:** "If a person is assessed a history of 5 rem or more for the current year", that individual is not permitted to receive any additional occupational dose during that year (except a planned special exposure). The answer to Question 6 does not imply that the individual can receive any additional occupational dose (except in a planned special exposure). As noted in the preamble to revised Part 20 (56 FR 23369, second column), "the allowance of an additional 1 rem per quarter following an exposure in excess of the limits has been deleted" from the final rule published on May 21, 1991. The answer to Question 6 is consistent with the rule and the answer to Question 113, which states that "...if the 5 rem CEDE was received during the current year, this individual would not be allowed any further exposure for the balance of the year."

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1201, 10 CFR 20.2104)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017