alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001

99–696 DTP 2005

S. HRG. 108–135, PT. 5

[ERRATA]

CONFIRMATION HEARINGS ON FEDERAL

APPOINTMENTS

HEARINGS

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY 

UNITED STATES SENATE

ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS

SECOND SESSION

OCTOBER 15, NOVEMBER 12, AND NOVEMBER 19, 2003

Serial No. J–108–1

PART 5

Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary

(

[ERRATA]

On page IV of the Contents, at the end of the Questions and Answers, 

add the following:

Responses of Judith C. Herrera to additional questions submitted by Senator 

Durbin ................................................................................................................... 647

Responses of F. Dennis Saylor to additional questions submitted by Senator 

Durbin ................................................................................................................... 649

Responses of Sandra L. Townes to additional questions submitted by Senator 

Durbin ................................................................................................................... 651

On Page V of the Contents, at the end of the Questions and Answers, 

add the following:

Responses of Louis Guirola, Jr to additional questions submitted by Senator 

Durbin ................................................................................................................... 654

Responses of William J. Haynes II to additional questions submitted by 

Senator Durbin ..................................................................................................... 656

Responses of William J. Haynes II to additional questions submitted by 

Senator Leahy ...................................................................................................... 658

Responses of Virginia E. Hopkins to additional questions submitted by Senator Durbin ........................................................................................................... 664

Responses of Kenneth M. Karas to additional questions submitted by Senator 

Durbin ................................................................................................................... 667

At the end of the volume, insert the follwing new pages, 647–668: 

647


99696.001
648


99696.002
649


99696.003
650


99696.004
651


99696.005
652


99696.006
653


99696.007
654


99696.008
655


99696.009
656


99696.010
657


99696.011
658


99696.012
659


99696.013
660


99696.014
661


99696.015
662


99696.016
663


99696.017
664


99696.018
665


99696.019
666


99696.020
667


99696.021
668

Æ


99696.022
#### State of Connecticut v. The R.A. Civitello Company, Inc.

Bradley K. Cooney, in support of the petition.

William J. White, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided April 23, 1986

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 6 Conn. App. 438, is denied.
#### Marion T. McLane, Respondent, v. Ellicott Square Company of Buffalo, Appellant.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 41—ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF UNITED STATES COURTS**

Sec.
601.
Creation; Director and Deputy Director.
602.
Employees.
603.
Salaries.
604.
Duties of Director generally.
605.
Budget estimates.
606.
Duties of Deputy Director.
607.
Practice of law prohibited.
608.
Seal.
609.
Courts' appointive power unaffected.
610.
Courts defined.
611.
Retirement of Director.
612.
Judiciary Automation Fund. 1

613.
Disbursing and certifying officers.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2000**—Pub. L. 106–518, title III, §304(b), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2418, added item 613.

**1989**—Pub. L. 101–162, title IV, §404(b)(2), Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1015, added item 612.

**1967**—Pub. L. 90–219, title II, §201(b), Dec. 20, 1967, 81 Stat. 668, added item 611.

**1959**—Pub. L. 86–370, §5(a)(2), Sept. 23, 1959, 73 Stat. 652, substituted "Deputy Director" for "Assistant Director" in items 601 and 606.

**1949**—Act May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §72a, 63 Stat. 100, inserted an apostrophe after "Courts" and struck out comma after "Courts" in item 609.

1  Section catchline amended by Pub. L. 104–106 without corresponding amendment of chapter analysis.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 2 7 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk June 2 7 , 2018

15 7 8 12 ( 6 9 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

, SC: 15 7 8 12

v C OA: 3 34024

Wayne CC: 15

- 010216

- FC

ARTHUR LAROME JEMISON

, Defendant

- Appellant

.

__________________________________ _____ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of Richard D. Friedman to file a brief amicus

curiae in support of the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED . The amicus brief

submitted on June 25, 2018, is accepted for filing.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Murray Daniels, Appellant, against Max Udell Sons & Company et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 383

**Question 383:** Reports of planned special exposures (PSEs) are required by 10 CFR 20.2204 to be submitted within 30 days of the PSE to the NRC Regional Office. Complete records of PSEs are required to be maintained in accordance with 10 CFR 20.2105 and the monitoring results for PSEs should be recorded on NRC Form 5 or equivalent in accordance with the guidance in Regulatory Guide 8.7, Revision 1.
> 
(a) Are the PSE dose reports also required to be submitted to NRC annually in accordance with 20.2206?

(b) If so, is only the NRC Form 5 equivalent required to be submitted, or does the other information required by 10 CFR 20.2105 also have to be included? (c) Should separate NRC Form 5s, i.e., one for routine dose and one for PSE dose, be submitted for each applicable individual?

**Answer:**
> 
(a) Yes.

(b) Only the information on Form 5. The information required by 10 CFR 20.2105 does not have to be included in the reports required by 10 CFR 20.2206. (c) Two separate forms, one for routine dose and one for PSE dose should be submitted for each individual who had both routine and PSE doses. Separate reports are needed because completion of Item 9B on Form 5 requires indicating whether the reported occupational exposure is for routine exposure or for PSE. In other words, the design of the Form 5 does not allow both routine exposures and PSEs to be reported on the same form.

(References: 10 CFR 20.2206, 10 CFR 20.1206, 10 CFR 20.2204, Regulatory Guide 8.7)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, November 27, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-14209-ROSENBERG/MAYNARD

DAVID POSCHMANN, 

Plaintiff,

v.

 

MARSH ENTERPRISES OF SW FLORIDA, INC.

and APPLE TREE HOLDINGS OF KEY WEST, LLC

 

Defendants.

_____________________________________________/

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The parties stipulate and agree that this action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) with each party to bear his/its own fees and costs, 

except as otherwise agreed in the parties’ settlement agreement.

Dated: December 28, 2020

s/Drew M. Levitt

Drew M. Levitt

Florida Bar No. 782246

drewmlevitt@gmail.com

Lee D. Sarkin

Florida Bar No. 962848

lsarkin@aol.com

4700 N.W. Boca Raton Boulevard

Suite 302

Boca Raton, Florida 33431

Telephone (561) 994-6922

Attorneys for Plaintiff

s/Nikki Pappas

Nikki Pappas

Florida Bar No. 126355

nikki@smithhawks.com

Christopher B. Deem

Florida Bar No. 94462

chris@smithhawks.com

SMITH/HAWKS

138 Simonton Street

Key West, Florida 33040

Telephone (305) 296-7227

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 2:20-cv-14209-RLR Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/28/2020 Page 1 of 1
Order entered March 18, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00189-CR

THOMAS ANDERSON GIROUX, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 15th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 069348

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

We abated this appeal for the trial court to determine whether appellant was entitled to 

the appointment of counsel. On March 14, 2019, we received the trial court’s findings. We 

ADOPT the findings that appellant (1) desires to prosecute this appeal; and (2) is represented by 

retained counsel Stephen A. Gustitis. 

We DIRECT the Clerk to list Stephen A. Gustitis as retained counsel for appellant.

Future correspondence shall be sent to Stephen A. Gustitis, State Bar number 08634600, at 102 

E. 26th Street, Bryan, TX 77803, telephone number 979-823-9111.

The record is DUE April 9, 2019.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
No: 23-019 March 3, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Issues Annual Assessments for Nation’s Nuclear Power Plants

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued annual letters to the nation’s operating 

commercial nuclear reactors assessing their 2022 performance.

Of the 93 reactors currently in the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process, 87 reached the 

highest performance category in safety and security. Those reactors (including Vogtle Unit 3, 

which was authorized for operation last year) remain under the NRC’s “baseline” inspection 

program, involving thousands of inspection hours for each reactor. 

Six reactors were in the second performance category, as they need to resolve one or two 

items of low safety significance. For this performance level, regulatory oversight includes 

additional inspection and follow-up of corrective actions. Plants in this category are Calvert 

Cliffs 1 (Maryland), Davis-Besse (Ohio), Peach Bottom 2 (Pennsylvania), Quad Cities 2 

(Illinois), V.C. Summer (South Carolina) and Waterford (Louisiana). 

There were no reactors in the third and fourth performance categories. 

Later this spring and summer, the NRC will host a public meeting or other event for each 

plant to discuss the annual assessment results. A separate announcement will be issued for each 

public assessment meeting. In addition to the annual assessment letters, plants also receive an 

NRC inspection plan for the coming year. 

The NRC’s website outlines oversight of commercial nuclear power on the Reactor 

Oversight Process page. The NRC routinely updates each plant’s current performance and posts 

the latest information as it becomes available to the action matrix summary. Assessment letters 

are posted on the NRC website (click on “2022006” for each plant). Annual construction 

oversight assessments for new reactors at the Vogtle units 3 and 4 sites are also on the NRC 

website.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company v. Public Service Commission for the Second District.

Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,421
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,166
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,128
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,548
<PP&E>                                         134,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                  71,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,272
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           756
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,313
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,888
<SALES>                                        112,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,728
<CGS>                                           95,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  132,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,228)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   345
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  69
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,456)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,494
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,950)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,950)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.60)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 199 (Friday, October 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23224]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Federal Maritime Commission.

Time and Date: 10 a.m.-October 27, 2004.

Place: 800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, 
Washington, DC.

Status: A portion of the meeting will be open to the public and the 
remainder of the meeting will be closed.

Matters To Be Considered: 

The Open Portion of the Meeting

    1. Petition No. P3-03--Petition of United Parcel Service, Inc., for 
Exemption Pursuant to Section 16 of the Shipping Act of 1984 to Permit 
Negotiation, Entry and Performance of Service Contracts; Petition No. 
P5-03--Petition of the National Customs Brokers and Forwarders 
Association of America, Inc., for Limited Exemption from Certain Tariff 
Requirements of the Shipping Act of 1984; Petition No. P7-03--Petition 
of Ocean World Lines, Inc., for a Rulemaking to Amend and Expand the 
Definition and Scope of ``Special Contracts'' to Include All Ocean 
Transportation Intermediaries; Petition No. P8-03--Petition of BAX 
Global, Inc., for Rulemaking; Petition No. P9-03--Petition of C.H. 
Robinson Worldwide, Inc., for Exemption Pursuant to Section 16 of the 
Shipping Act of 1984 to Permit Negotiation, Entry and Performance of 
Confidential Service Contracts; Petition No. P1-04--Petition of Danzas 
Corporation d/b/a Danmar Lines Ltd.; Danzas AEI Ocean Services and DHL 
Danzas Air and Ocean for Exemption from the Tariff Publishing 
Requirements of Section 8 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as Amended; 
Petition No. P2-04--Petition of BDP International, Inc., for Exemption 
from the Tariff Publishing Requirements of Section 8 of the Shipping 
Act of 1984, as amended; Petition No. P4-04--Petition of FEDEX Trade 
Networks Transport & Brokerage, Inc., for Exemption from the Tariff 
Publishing Requirements of Sections 8 and 10 of the Shipping Act of 
1984, as Amended.
    2. Draft Final Rule, Docket No. 03-15, Ocean Common Carrier and 
Marine Terminal Operator Agreements Subject to the Shipping Act of 
1984.

The Closed Portion of the Meetings

    1. Petition No. P5-04--Petition of American President Lines, Ltd. 
and APL Co. Pte. Ltd., for a Full Exemption from the First Sentence of 
Section 9(c) of the Shipping Act of 1984, as amended.

Contact Person For More Information: Bryant L. VanBrakle, Secretary, 
(202) 523-5725.

Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-23224 Filed 10-13-04; 11:13 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
### §2678. Attorney fees; penalty

No attorney shall charge, demand, receive, or collect for services rendered, fees in excess of 25 per centum of any judgment rendered pursuant to section 1346(b) of this title or any settlement made pursuant to section 2677 of this title, or in excess of 20 per centum of any award, compromise, or settlement made pursuant to section 2672 of this title.

Any attorney who charges, demands, receives, or collects for services rendered in connection with such claim any amount in excess of that allowed under this section, if recovery be had, shall be fined not more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 984; Pub. L. 89–506, §4, July 18, 1966, 80 Stat. 307.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §944 (Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, §422, 60 Stat. 846).

Words "shall be guilty of a misdemeanor" and "shall, upon conviction thereof", in the second sentence, were omitted in conformity with revised title 18, U.S.C., Crimes and Criminal Procedure (H.R. 1600, 80th Cong.). See sections 1 and 2 of said revised title 18.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### Senate Revision Amendment

This section was renumbered "2677" by Senate amendment. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1966—Pub. L. 89–506 raised the limitations on allowable attorneys fees from 10 to 20 percent for administrative settlements and from 20 to 25 percent for fees in cases after suit is filed and removed the requirement of agency or court allowance of the amount of attorneys fees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1966 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 89–506 applicable to claims accruing six months or more after July 18, 1966, see section 10 of Pub. L. 89–506, set out as a note under section 2672 of this title.
Exhibit
32(a)





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, OF THE


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rocky Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mike
Brooks, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Mike BrooksMike Brooks, Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerOctober
      30, 2009
#### The First National Bank of Yonkers, N. Y., Respondent, v. Anthony Fisher, Defendant, and Gaetono Chiangone, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich," Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                    This  schedule   contains  summary   financial   information
                    extracted from the Balance  Sheet,  Statements of Operations
                    and  Statements  of  Cash  Flows,  and is  qualified  in its
                    entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000895464
<NAME>                        Magna-Lab Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                       1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.000
<CASH>                                                 0
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     61,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  61,000
<PP&E>                                            17,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   392,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    78,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,379,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (2,307,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      78,000
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  71,371
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 278,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 3,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (281,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (281,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (281,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.06)
        


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.213 What fixed interest rates may a Lender charge? ( a ) *Fixed Rates for Guaranteed Loans.* A loan may have a reasonable fixed interest rate. SBA periodically publishes the maximum allowable rate in the Federal Register.
( b ) *Direct loans.* A statutory formula based on the cost of money to the Federal government determines the interest rate on direct loans. SBA publishes the rate periodically in the Federal Register.
#### § 123.104 What interest rate will I pay on my home disaster loan?

If you can obtain credit elsewhere, your interest rate is set by a statutory formula, but will not exceed eight (8) percent per annum. If you cannot obtain credit elsewhere, your interest rate is one-half the statutory rate, but will not exceed four (4) percent per annum. Generally, credit elsewhere means that SBA believes you could obtain financing from non-Federal sources on reasonable terms subsequent to the declaration of a disaster. SBA may include the use of credit score to make this determination. If you cannot obtain credit elsewhere, you also may be able to borrow from SBA to refinance existing recorded liens against your damaged real property.

[89 FR 59831, July 24, 2024]