alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 292/24 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 292 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4824 November 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 292

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4824 November 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2005/C 292/1 | Resolution of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on mobilising the brainpower of Europe: enabling higher education to make its full contribution to the Lisbon Strategy | 1 |
| 2005/C 292/2 | Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the role of the development of skills and competences in taking forward the Lisbon goals | 3 |
| 2005/C 292/3 | Resolution of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on addressing the concerns of young people in Europe — implementing the European Pact for Youth and promoting active citizenship | 5 |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 292/4 | Euro exchange rates | 7 |
| 2005/C 292/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4043 — Plastal Group/Dynamit Nobel Kunststoff GmbH) (1) | 8 |
| 2005/C 292/6 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4029 — Kuehne + Nagel/ACR Logistics) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 9 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2005/C 292/1

Resolution of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on mobilising the brainpower of Europe: enabling higher education to make its full contribution to the Lisbon Strategy

1

2005/C 292/2

Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the role of the development of skills and competences in taking forward the Lisbon goals

3

2005/C 292/3

Resolution of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on addressing the concerns of young people in Europe — implementing the European Pact for Youth and promoting active citizenship

5

Commission

2005/C 292/4

Euro exchange rates

7

2005/C 292/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4043 — Plastal Group/Dynamit Nobel Kunststoff GmbH) (1)

8

2005/C 292/6

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4029 — Kuehne + Nagel/ACR Logistics) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### §2283. Stay of State court proceedings

A court of the United States may not grant an injunction to stay proceedings in a State court except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 968.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §379 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §265, 36 Stat. 1162).

An exception as to acts of Congress relating to bankruptcy was omitted and the general exception substituted to cover all exceptions.

The phrase "in aid of its jurisdiction" was added to conform to section 1651 of this title and to make clear the recognized power of the Federal courts to stay proceedings in State cases removed to the district courts.

The exceptions specifically include the words "to protect or "effectuate its judgments," for lack of which the Supreme Court held that the Federal courts are without power to enjoin relitigation of cases and controversies fully adjudicated by such courts. (See Toucey v. New York Life Insurance Co., 62 S.Ct. 139, 314 U.S. 118, 86 L.Ed. 100. A vigorous dissenting opinion (62 S.Ct. 148) notes that at the time of the 1911 revision of the Judicial Code, the power of the courts, of the United States to protect their judgments was unquestioned and that the revisers of that code noted no change and Congress intended no change).

Therefore the revised section restores the basic law as generally understood and interpreted prior to the Toucey decision.

Changes were made in phraseology.
PUBLIC LAW 109–5—MAR. 25, 2005 119 STAT. 19

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 384:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Feb. 16, considered and passed Senate.

Mar. 14, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 109–5

109th Congress

An Act

To extend the existence of the Nazi War Crimes and Japanese Imperial Government

Records Interagency Working Group for 2 years.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF WORKING GROUP.

Section 802(b)(1) of the Japanese Imperial Government Disclosure Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–567; 114 Stat. 2865) is amended

by striking ‘‘4 years’’ and inserting ‘‘6 years’’.

Approved March 25, 2005.

5 USC 552 note.

Mar. 25, 2005

[S. 384]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-229

October 28, 1999

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

(ACRS) has scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on plant license renewal on November

18 in Rockville, Maryland.

The subcommittee will review the staff’s resolution of the issues identified in the Safety

Evaluation Report on the license renewal of Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2, as

well as related license renewal activities.

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B1 of the agency’s Two White Flint North Building,

at 11545 Rockville Pike, beginning at 1:00 p.m.

Those who seek additional information on the meeting or changes to the agenda should

contact Noel Dudley, at 301-415-6888.

Other aspects of the meeting will be described in an upcoming edition of the Federal

Register. ACRS meeting notices, transcripts and letter reports are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

.

###
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-171 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, August 9, 1999)

BILL BORCHARDT NAMED DIRECTOR OF THE NRC’S

OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT

Bill Borchardt has been named Director of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Office

of Enforcement.

His appointment became effective August 1. Mr. Borchardt succeeds James Lieberman

who has been appointed as a Special Counsel in the Office of the General Counsel (OGC). Mr.

Lieberman's appointment to OGC was at his request to return to the legal field.

Mr. Borchardt joined the NRC in 1983 as a reactor engineer in Region I, outside of

Philadelphia, Pa.. Since that time, he has held a number of progressively responsible positions

including resident/senior resident inspector at the Limerick, Salem, and Hope Creek nuclear

power plants in the northeast; Senior Regional Coordinator, Office of the Executive Director for

Operations; Technical Assistant, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR); and Section

Chief in the Standardization Project Directorate, NRR.

He was appointed to the Senior Executive Service in 1993 and served as Director,

Standardization Project Directorate and Chief, Inspection Program Branch in NRR. In August

1998, he was appointed Deputy Director, Office of Enforcement.

Prior to joining the NRC, Mr. Borchardt was an officer in the U.S. Navy's Nuclear Power

Program. He is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy and received a B.S. degree in Chemistry

in 1978.

##
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

Case No.: 20-61282-CIV-VALLE 

RIGOBERTO SERRANO, and other 

similarly situated individuals, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TWIN STONE DESIGNS AND 

INSTALLATION, INC. (et al.),

Defendants. 

 

 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH RETENTION OF JURISDICTION 

 Plaintiff, RIGOBERTO SERRANO (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, TWIN STONE 

DESIGNS AND INSTALLATION, INC., MAYRA PARENTE and PLINIO IGNACIO MEDINA 

(collectively, “Defendants”), hereby jointly file this stipulation of dismissal with retention of 

jurisdiction subject to the following provisions: 

1. The parties stipulate that all claims brought herein by Plaintiff against Defendants 

shall be dismissed with prejudice contingent upon the Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the 

terms of the Settlement Agreement signed by the parties. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, 

LLC, 677 F.3d 1272, 1280 (11th Cir. 2012). 

2. Each party is to bear its/his/her own attorney’s fees and costs, except as specified 

in the parties’ settlement agreement. 

Dated: November 30, 2020. 

Case 0:20-cv-61282-AOV Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2020 Page 1 of 2
2 

Yadhira Ramírez-Toro 

Yadhira Ramírez-Toro (FBN: 120506) 

Email: yramirez@saenzanderson.com 

SAENZ & ANDERSON, PLLC 

20900 NE 30th Avenue, Ste. 800 

Aventura, Florida, 33180 

Telephone: (305) 503-5131 

Facsimile: (888) 270-5549 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

TRIPP SCOTT, PA 

110 SE 6th Street, 15th Floor 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 

Tel. 954-525-7500 

Fax. 954-761-8475 

Catalina M. Avalos 

CATALINA M. AVALOS 

Florida Bar Number 090425 

cma@trippscott.com 

sgc@trippscott.com 

eservice@trippscott.com 

SARAH M. LEON 

Florida Bar Number 1011028 

sml@trippscott.com

Counsel for Defendant 

Case 0:20-cv-61282-AOV Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Rose T. Vogel, Appellant. Frieda S. Miller, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

*938All concur.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 6

**Question 6:** What if an NRC licensee hires a DOE employee who earlier in the year received an internal exposure of less than 5 rems annual effective dose equivalent, but greater than 5 rems committed effective dose equivalent?

**Answer:** Previous occupational exposures, even those received at an unlicensed DOE facility, count against the limit. The worker could not be allowed further radiation exposure for the year (except a planned special exposure). Note: There are also licensed DOE facilities.

(References: 10 CFR 20.1201, 10 CFR 20.2104)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, December 13, 2017
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
BY EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of EntreMed, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael M. Tarnow, as
Executive Chairman of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the dates and periods covered by the
Report.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.





/s/ Michael M. TarnowNovember
      12, 2010
            
            Michael
      M. TarnowExecutive
      Chairman
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 415

**Question 415:** This question refers to the answer to Question 41 under §20.1201. This answer leaves open what is an acceptable frequency for querying monitored workers. This is only an issue of monitored workers, isn't it? In the interest of workload minimization, I suggest that an annual query / reminder along with the required annual 10 CFR 19 dosimetry report is adequate.

**Answer:** The requirements of 10 CFR 20.1201 (f) and the answer to Question 41 apply to any individual who will receive an occupational dose, not just those individuals for whom individual monitoring is required. The frequency for querying / reminding workers should be determined by the licensee; however, given that the dose limit is annual, the frequency should be no less than annually.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1201)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
### §585. Vacancies

(a) The Attorney General may appoint an acting United States trustee for a region in which the office of the United States trustee is vacant. The individual so appointed may serve until the date on which the vacancy is filled by appointment under section 581 of this title or by designation under subsection (b) of this section.

(b) The Attorney General may designate a United States trustee to serve in not more than two regions for such time as the public interest requires.

(Added Pub. L. 95–598, title II, §224(a), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2663; amended Pub. L. 99–554, title I, §112, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3091.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 408(c) of Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, which provided for the repeal of this section and the deletion of any references to United States Trustees in this title at a prospective date, was repealed by section 307(b) of Pub. L. 99–554. See note set out preceding section 581 of this title.

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–554 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "The Attorney General may appoint an acting United States trustee for a district in which the office of United States trustee is vacant, or may designate a United States trustee for another judicial district to serve as trustee for the district in which such vacancy exists. The individual so appointed or designated may serve until the earlier of 90 days after such appointment or designation, as the case may be, or the date on which the vacancy is filled by appointment under section 581 of this title."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–554 effective 30 days after Oct. 27, 1986, see section 302(a) of Pub. L. 99–554, set out as a note under section 581 of this title.
Exhibit
4.2


 


DESCRIPTION
OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES


REGISTERED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE


SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


 


As
of December 31, 2020, Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. had one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”): (i) common stock, $0.001 par value per share (“Common Stock”).


 


Unless
the context otherwise requires, all references to “we”, “us”, the “Company”, or “Greenwich
LifeSciences” in this Exhibit 4.1 refer to Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc.


 


DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK


 


The
following description of our securities is intended as a summary only and is qualified in its entirety by reference to our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, which are filed as exhibits to the annual report on Form 10-K of which this
Exhibit 4.16 is a part.


 


Authorized
Capitalization


 


Our
authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value
per share (“Preferred Stock”) in one or more series. As of December 31, 2020, we had outstanding 12,703,541 shares
of our Common Stock and no shares of Preferred Stock.


 


Transfer
Agent and Registrar. The transfer agent for our Common Stock is Philadelphia Stock Transfer.


 


Listing.
Our Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “GLSI.”


 


Common
Stock


 


Holders
of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. Holders
of our common stock have no cumulative voting rights.


 


Further,
holders of our common stock have no preemptive or conversion rights or other subscription rights. Upon our liquidation, dissolution
or winding-up, holders of our common stock are entitled to share in all assets remaining after payment of all liabilities and
the liquidation preferences of any of our outstanding shares of preferred stock. Subject to preferences that may be applicable
to any outstanding shares of preferred stock, holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends, if any, as may be
declared from time to time by our board of directors out of our assets which are legally available. Each outstanding share of
our common stock is, and all shares of common stock to be issued in this offering when they are paid for will be, fully paid and
non-assessable.


 


The
holders of a majority of the shares of our capital stock, represented in person or by proxy, are necessary to constitute a quorum
for the transaction of business at any meeting. If a quorum is present, an action by stockholders entitled to vote on a matter
is approved if the number of votes cast in favor of the action exceeds the number of votes cast in opposition to the action, with
the exception of the election of directors, which requires a plurality of the votes cast.


 




    	- 1 -
### §132. Creation and composition of district courts

(a) There shall be in each judicial district a district court which shall be a court of record known as the United States District Court for the district.

(b) Each district court shall consist of the district judge or judges for the district in regular active service. Justices or judges designated or assigned shall be competent to sit as judges of the court.

(c) Except as otherwise provided by law, or rule or order of court, the judicial power of a district court with respect to any action, suit or proceeding may be exercised by a single judge, who may preside alone and hold a regular or special session of court at the same time other sessions are held by other judges.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 895; Pub. L. 88–176, §2, Nov. 13, 1963, 77 Stat. 331.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §1, and section 641 of title 48, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Territories and Insular Possessions (Apr. 30, 1900, ch. 339, §86, 31 Stat. 158; Mar. 3, 1909, ch. 269, §1, 35 Stat. 838; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §1, 36 Stat. 1087; July 30, 1914, ch. 216, 38 Stat. 580; July 19, 1921, ch. 42, §313, 42 Stat. 119; Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 220, 43 Stat. 890; Dec. 13, 1926, ch. 6, §1, 44 Stat. 19).

Section consolidates section 1 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., and section 641 of title 48, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with changes in phraseology necessary to effect the consolidation.

Subsection (c) is derived from section 641 of title 48, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which applied only to the Territory of Hawaii. The revised section, by extending it to all districts, merely recognizes established practice.

Other portions of section 1 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., are incorporated in sections 133 and 134 of this title. The remainder of section 641 of title 48, U.S.C., 1940 ed., is incorporated in sections 91 and 133 of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1963—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 88–176 inserted "regular" before "active service".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Continuation of Organization of Court

Act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §2(b), 62 Stat. 985, provided in part that the provisions of this title as set out in section 1 of act June 25, 1948, with respect to the organization of the court, shall be construed as a continuation of existing law, and the tenure of the judges, officers, and employees thereof and of the United States attorneys and marshals and their deputies and assistants, in office on Sept. 1, 1948, shall not be affected by its enactment, but each of them shall continue to serve in the same capacity under the appropriate provisions of this title pursuant to his prior appointment.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Alberto SANCHEZ-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50569.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*304PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mario Alberto Sanchez-Vasquez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*528 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, Appellant, against William S. Miller et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents. (Tax Year 1941-1942.) The People of the State of New York ex rel. Mansion Estates, Inc., Appellant, against James J. Sexton et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents. (Tax Year 1933.) The People of the State of New York ex rel. Mansion Estates, Inc., Appellant, against James J. Sexton et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents. (Tax Year 1932.)

*915Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateAdvisory ActivitiesAdvisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes

# Contact Us About the Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes

If you need to report a safety concern, please do not use this page. Instead, please see Report a Safety or Security Concern.

Would you like to remain anonymous?:*

YesNo

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 11, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - ACMUI Membership
          - ACMUI Recommendations and Actions
          - ACMUI Subcommittees
          - ACMUI History
          - Contact Us
          - ACMUI Charter

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 11, 2024
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2013 - 0327 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM161AD
737 - 53A1200, R1 --- 7/7/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008