alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dear Financial Aid Administrator:

The Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) is requesting institutions , that administered the TEACH Grant Program during the 20 13
- 14 Award Year, to provide student level data to aid in the Department’s requirement to submit an annual progress report to Congress , as mandated in Section 420P of the Higher Education Act , as amended by the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008

. The report will be developed primarily with data from Federal Student Aid (FSA) , the Application Processing System and the Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) System. However there are two key data elements that are not available through these systems and must be provided by each institution: the student’s Classification Instructional Program (CIP) Code and the student’s Total Cost of Education for the 20 13
- 14 award year. OPE will provide you with following student level data:

 Student’s First and Last Name  Students Date of Birth  Student’s Total TEACH Grant Award as reported to COD In orde r to facilitate this process, OPE has developed a n online data collection tool for financial aid administrators to use to submit the data for the 20 13
-20 14 recipients of TEACH Grant Program

. You will be provided with instructions on how to log in to the site. The data collection site is slated be available on or about November 3 , 201 4 . You will have 6 0 days to provide the data requested. The web address is: https://opeweb.ed.gov/TEACH Should you have questions regarding report requirements, please contact :

Freddie Cross , PhD, OPE/PPI/Strategic Planning, Analysis, & Initiatives Services Staff 202
-502
-7489 Freddie.Cross@ed.gov

Sincerely,
Lynn Mahaffie Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary For Policy, Planning, & InnovationAccording to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to

respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of informatio n is estimated to average 60 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is necessary to obtain or retain a benefit, as identified in Section 420P of the Higher Education Act, as amended by the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008. S end comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW , Washington, DC 20210
-4537 or email Richard.Lee@ed.gov.Teach Home Page :
### §2107. Authority to prescribe regulations

(a) The Secretary of Labor shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this chapter. Such regulations shall, at a minimum, include interpretative regulations describing the methods by which employers may provide for appropriate service of notice as required by this chapter.

(b) The mailing of notice to an employee's last known address or inclusion of notice in the employee's paycheck will be considered acceptable methods for fulfillment of the employer's obligation to give notice to each affected employee under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 100–379, §8, Aug. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 894.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 6 months after Aug. 4, 1988, except that the authority of the Secretary of Labor under this section is effective on Aug. 4, 1988, see section 11 of Pub. L. 100–379, set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 411

**Question 411:** Under 10 CFR 19.12, what is the minimum training that licensees must provide to visitors who will enter a restricted area (where the occupational dose limits apply)?

**Answer:**10 CFR 19.12, "Instructions to Workers," requires that training (instruction) be provided to "all individuals working in or frequenting any portion of a restricted area." Frequenting an area means to pay frequent visits to the area or to be in the area often. Therefore, 10 CFR 19.12 does not apply to infrequent visitors who will not be working in the restricted area.

However, 10 CFR 19.12 does apply to visitors or other individuals (a) who will be working in the restricted area or (b) who are expected to be in the area often. (Thus, 10 CFR 19.12 does require instruction of anyone working in a restricted area, even if that work is infrequent.) Licensees have the responsibility to determine which individuals are frequent visitors and which are not. Although not required by 10 CFR 19.12, in accordance with good radiation protection practice, infrequent visitor(s) should be provided with a trained escort who will provide the visitor(s) with the information needed for protection from any potential radiological hazards.

(Reference: 10 CFR 19.12)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
#### In the Matter of Max Proyect, Judgment Creditor, Respondent, v. Hyman Bergman, Judgment Debtor, Appellant.

All concur.
PUBLIC LAW 110–214—MAY 7, 2008 122 STAT. 727 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3803: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Feb. 28, considered and passed House. 

Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–214 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3100 Cashwell 

Drive in Goldsboro, North Carolina, as the ‘‘John Henry Wooten, Sr. Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JOHN HENRY WOOTEN, SR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 3100 Cashwell Drive in Goldsboro, North Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘John Henry Wooten, 

Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘John Henry Wooten, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

Approved May 7, 2008. 

May 7, 2008 

[H.R. 3803] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
### §1133. Claims procedure

In accordance with regulations of the Secretary, every employee benefit plan shall—

(1) provide adequate notice in writing to any participant or beneficiary whose claim for benefits under the plan has been denied, setting forth the specific reasons for such denial, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the participant, and

(2) afford a reasonable opportunity to any participant whose claim for benefits has been denied for a full and fair review by the appropriate named fiduciary of the decision denying the claim.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §503, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 893.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Regulations

Secretary authorized, effective Sept. 2, 1974, to promulgate regulations wherever provisions of this subchapter call for the promulgation of regulations, see section 1031 of this title.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAsymptotic-induced numerical methods for conservation lawsAsymptotic-induced methods are presented for the numerical solution of hyperbolic conservation laws with or without viscosity. The methods consist of multiple stages. The first stage is to obtain a first approximation by using a first-order method, such as the Godunov scheme. Subsequent stages of the method involve solving internal-layer problems identified by using techniques derived via asymptotics. Finally, a residual correction increases the accuracy of the scheme. The method is derived and justified with singular perturbation techniques.Document ID19910006992Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsGarbey, Marc*(Lyon-1 Univ. Hampton, VA, United States)*Scroggs, Jeffrey S.*(Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:187483AD-A232082NASA-CR-187483ICASE-90-87Accession Number91N16305Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: W-31-109-ENG-38CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18605Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910006992.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
----

Action brought on 2 November 2005 — T v Commission

(Case T-400/05)

(2006/C 22/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: T (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and Y. Minatchy, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Forms of order sought

The applicant claim that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant is a former Commission official, in retirement since 1 September 2005. By her action, she contests the defendant's decision to consider some of her absences in 2004 to be improper and to be set against her annual leave entitlement and her remuneration. In support of her action she alleges infringement of the duty to give reasons, infringement of the principles of equal treatment and sound administration and the duty to have regard for the interests of officials.

The applicant also alleges infringement of Article 59 of the Staff Regulations in so far as she has medical certificates for the periods of absence at issue. In addition, she alleges infringement of Article 57 of the Staff Regulations and Annex V thereto concerning annual leave, a manifest error of assessment and misuse of powers.

The applicant also claims that she should be compensated for both the pecuniary and non-pecuniary loss that she allegedly incurred as a result of the defendant's actions.

----
exhibit 32



             FORM OF SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Gold Camp Cripple
Creek Colorado, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the
year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Don Downen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.


Date: 3/19/04
      -------


/s/ Don Downen
--------------
Don Downen
President/CEO


A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/1/


             FORM OF SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Gold Camp Cripple
Creek Colorado, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the
year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John Schaffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.


Date: 3/19/04
      -------


/s/ John Schaffer
-----------------
John Schaffer
Treasurer/CFO


A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/2/
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe interstellar D1 line at high resolutionObservations at a resolving power or a velocity resolution are reported of the interstellar D(sub 1) line of Na I in the spectra of gamma Cas, delta Ori, epsilon Ori, pi Sco, delta Cyg, and alpha Cyg. An echelle grating was used in a double-pass configuration with a CCD detector in the coude spectrograph of the 2.7 m reflector at McDonald Observatory. At least 42 kinematically distinct clouds are detected along the light paths to the five more distant stars, in addition to a single cloud seen toward delta Cyg. The absorption lines arising in 13 of the clouds are sufficiently narrow and unblended to reveal clearly resolved hyperfine structure components split by 1.05 km/s. An additional 13 clouds apparently show comparably narrow, but more strongly blended, lines. For each individual cloud, upper limits T(sub max) and (v sub t)(sub max) on the temperature and the turbulent velocity, respectively, are derived by fitting the observed lines with theoretical absorption profiles.Document ID19900017421Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsHobbs, L. M.*(Yerkes Observatory Williams Bay, WI, United States)*Welty, D. E.*(Yerkes Observatory Williams Bay, WI, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryAstrophysicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:184915NASA-CR-184915Accession Number90N26737Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-1475Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017421.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2002 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Lathrop Brown, Respondent v. Hugh M. O’Brien, and Others, as Members of and Together Constituting the Board of Inspectors of Elections of Election District No. 9, Town of North Hempstead, Nassau County, and Others, Respondents. Frederick C. Hicks, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 13.)

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Order modified in accordance with opinion in *People ex rel. Brown*v. *Freisch, No. 1 (ante,*p. 370), decided herewith, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before the presiding justice.
### [§815. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §13514(a), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2143]

Section, added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title II, §211(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 747; amended Pub. L. 99–514, title X, §1011(b)(10), title XVIII, §1821(k)(1), (2), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2389, 2841; Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1010(j)(1), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3456; Pub. L. 108–357, title VII, §705(a), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1549; Pub. L. 113–295, div. A, title II, §221(a)(41)(G), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4044, related to distributions to shareholders from pre-1984 policyholders surplus account.

A prior section 815, added Pub. L. 86–69, §2(a), June 25, 1959, 73 Stat. 129; amended Pub. L. 87–790, §3(b), Oct. 10, 1962, 76 Stat. 808; Pub. L. 87–858, §3(b)(4), (e), Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1137; Pub. L. 88–571, §§2, 3(a), 4(a), Sept. 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 857, 859; Pub. L. 90–225, §4(a), (b), Dec. 27, 1967, 81 Stat. 733, 734; Pub. L. 91–172, title IX, §907(b), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 715; Pub. L. 94–331, §1(a), June 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 781; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §§1901(b)(1)(O), (24), (33)(H), 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1791, 1798, 1801, 1834, contained provisions similar to this section, prior to the general revision of this part by Pub. L. 98–369, §211(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, see section 13514(c) of Pub. L. 115–97, set out as an Effective Date of 2017 Amendment note under section 801 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Robert Spivak, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Grill Concepts, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March
28, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Grill Concepts, Inc.


                                   By:   /s/ Robert Spivak
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                   Name: Robert Spivak
                                   Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                   May 24, 2004


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT H

Case 1:20-cv-22393-CMA Document 1-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-22393-CMA Document 1-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 2 of 2
### Part I—Microenterprise Grants Program
39–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–219 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3132, 

CHILDREN’S SAFETY ACT OF 2005 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 436] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 436, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 3132, the 

Children’s Safety Act of 2005, under a modified open rule. The rule 

provides one hour of general debate equally divided and controlled 

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 

on the Judiciary. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

bill. The rule provides that the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill shall be considered as an original bill for the purpose 

of amendment. The rule provides that the bill shall be considered 

for amendment under the five-minute rule and that it shall be read 

by title. 

The rule makes in order only those amendments to the bill that 

are pre-printed in the Congressional Record or are pro forma 

amendments for the purpose of debate. The rule provides that each 

amendment printed in the Congressional Record may be offered 

only by the Member who caused it to be printed or a designee, and 

that each amendment shall be considered as read. 

Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

2 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of points of order is necessary because the committee 

report of Committee on the Judiciary (H. Rept. 109–218) did not 

contain a cost estimate when it was filed on September 9, 2005, as 

required by clause 3(d) of rule XIII (requiring a cost estimate to accompany committee reports). It is anticipated that the Committee 

on the Judiciary will file a supplemental report containing a cost 

estimate from the Congressional Budget Office on Tuesday, September 13, 2005. 

Æ
### §179. Injunctions during national emergency; adjustment efforts by parties during injunction period

#### (a) Assistance of Service; acceptance of Service's proposed settlement

Whenever a district court has issued an order under section 178 of this title enjoining acts or practices which imperil or threaten to imperil the national health or safety, it shall be the duty of the parties to the labor dispute giving rise to such order to make every effort to adjust and settle their differences, with the assistance of the Service created by this chapter. Neither party shall be under any duty to accept, in whole or in part, any proposal of settlement made by the Service.

#### (b) Reconvening of board of inquiry; report by board; contents; secret ballot of employees by National Labor Relations Board; certification of results to Attorney General

Upon the issuance of such order, the President shall reconvene the board of inquiry which has previously reported with respect to the dispute. At the end of a sixty-day period (unless the dispute has been settled by that time), the board of inquiry shall report to the President the current position of the parties and the efforts which have been made for settlement, and shall include a statement by each party of its position and a statement of the employer's last offer of settlement. The President shall make such report available to the public. The National Labor Relations Board, within the succeeding fifteen days, shall take a secret ballot of the employees of each employer involved in the dispute on the question of whether they wish to accept the final offer of settlement made by their employer as stated by him and shall certify the results thereof to the Attorney General within five days thereafter.

(June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title II, §209, 61 Stat. 155.)