alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 124
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 124 appear at 72 FR 50040, Aug. 30, 2007, and 76 FR 8253, Feb. 11, 2011.

§ 124.519 Are there any dollar limits on the amount of 8(a) contracts that a Participant may receive? ( a ) A Participant (other than one owned by an Indian Tribe, ANC, NHO, or CDC) may not receive sole source 8(a) contract awards where it has received a combined total of competitive and sole source 8(a) contracts in excess of $168,500,000 during its participation in the 8(a) BD program.
( b ) In determining whether a Participant has reached the limit identified in paragraph (a) of this section, SBA: ( 1 ) Looks at the 8(a) revenues a Participant has actually received, not projected 8(a) revenues that a Participant might receive through an indefinite delivery or indefinite quantity contract, a multiple award contract, or options or modifications; and
( 2 ) Will not consider 8(a) contracts awarded under the Simplified Acquisition Threshold.
( c ) Once the limit is reached, a firm may not receive any more 8(a) sole source contracts, but may remain eligible for competitive 8(a) awards.
( d ) A Participant's eligibility for a sole source award in terms of whether it has exceeded the dollar limit for 8(a) contracts is measured as of the date that the requirement is accepted for the 8(a) program without taking into account whether the value of that award will cause the limit to be exceeded.
( e ) The AA/BD may waive the requirement prohibiting a Participant from receiving sole source 8(a) contracts in excess of the dollar amount set forth in this section where the head of a procuring activity represents that award of a sole source 8(a) contract to the Participant is needed to achieve significant interests of the Government.
[63 FR 35739, June 30, 1998, as amended at 76 FR 8262, Feb. 11, 2011; 77 FR 28238, May 14, 2012; 85 FR 66191, Oct. 16, 2020; 87 FR 69154, Nov. 17, 2022]
Editorial Note on Part 124
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 124 appear at 72 FR 50040, Aug. 30, 2007, and 76 FR 8253, Feb. 11, 2011.

§ 124.514 Exercise of 8(a) options and modifications. ( a ) *Unpriced options.* The exercise of an unpriced option is considered to be a new contracting action. ( 1 ) If a concern has graduated or been terminated from the 8(a) BD program or is no longer small under the size standard corresponding to the NAICS code for the requirement, negotiations to price the option cannot be entered into and the option cannot be exercised.
( 2 ) If the concern is still a Participant and otherwise eligible for the requirement on a sole source basis, the procuring activity contracting officer may negotiate price and exercise the option provided the option, considered a new contracting action, meets all regulatory requirements, including the procuring activity's offering and SBA's acceptance of the requirement for the 8(a) BD program.
( 3 ) If the estimated fair market price of the option exceeds the applicable threshold amount set forth in § 124.506, the requirement must be competed as a new contract among eligible Participants.
( b ) *Priced options.* Except as set forth in § 124.521(e)(2), the procuring activity contracting officer may exercise a priced option to an 8(a) contract whether the concern that received the award has graduated or been terminated from the 8(a) BD program or is no longer eligible if to do so is in the best interests of the Government.
( c ) *Modifications beyond the scope.* A modification beyond the scope of the initial 8(a) contract award is considered to be a new contracting action. It will be treated the same as an unpriced option as described in paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) *Modifications within the scope.* The procuring activity contracting officer may exercise a modification within the scope of the initial 8(a) contract whether the concern that received the award has graduated or been terminated from the 8(a) BD program or is no longer eligible if to do so is in the best interests of the Government.
[63 FR 35739, June 30, 1998, as amended at 85 FR 66191, Oct. 16, 2020]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Insightful Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, the undersigned, Jeffrey
Coombs, President and Chief Executive Officer of Insightful Corporation, does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Insightful Corporation.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2006



By:

/s/ Jeffrey E. CoombsJeffrey E. CoombsPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Tugee Laces, Inc., Respondent, and Mary Muffet, Inc., Appellant.

Order reversed, with $20 costs and dis*757bursements to the appellant and the motion denied. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Glennon and Cohn, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm. No opinion. Settle order on notice.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Use of Hydro Nuclear Service Dry Active Waste Disposal

## HPPOS-106 PDR-9111210246

See the memorandum from J. G. Partlow to J. A. Hind dated June 14, 1985, and the enclosed memorandum from L. J. Cunningham to L. R. Greger dated May 17, 1985.

If the equipment performs per Hydro Nuclear's description and is operated according to their instructions, there appears to be no problem with licensee use for sorting of dry active waste.

The health physics position was written in the context of 10 CFR 20.201, 20.301, and 20.302, but it also applies to the "new" 10 CFR Part 20, Sections 20.1501, 20.2001, and 20.2002.

In response to the Region III memorandum dated May 21, 1985, OIE needs to point out one clarification. That is, the NRC staff has not yet formally evaluated the Hydro Nuclear System. Our understanding is that Hydro Nuclear will submit a topical report to NRC for review in the near future.

Upon completion of this review, we will send you a copy of the staff's review. In the meantime, our position is that if the equipment performs according to Hydro Nuclear's description and is operated according to their instructions, we see no problem with licensee use. However, the licensee should contact NRR if it plans to dispose of any waste containing detectable amount of radioactivity pursuant to 10 CFR 20.302 [or 10 CFR 20.2002].

In other words, we have no objections to the use of this equipment provided that it is properly operated, as intended by Hydro Nuclear, and that all waste determined to contain detectable licensed material is disposed of as radioactive waste in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 20.301 [or 10 CFR 20.2001]; thus, meeting the intent of IE Circular No. 81.07.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 20.201, 10 CFR 20.1501

**Subject codes:** 9.3, 9.7

**Applicability:** Reactors

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, October 13, 2017
#### Egg Mart, Inc., v. Pilgrim Hygrade Ice Cream, Inc.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Present — Peek, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 874.]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

JUAN CRENA,

Case No. 1:20-cv-22744-FAM

Plaintiff,

vs.

NAVITELIA INDUSTRIES, INC.,

d/b/a OXYBREATH PRO, and

d/b/a DRESIDE,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff Juan Crena, by and through undersigned 

counsel, hereby gives notice of his voluntary dismissal of this case with prejudice.

Defendant Navitelia Industries, Inc. has not answered or moved for summary judgment.

Dated: July 13, 2020

Respectfully submitted,

Eduardo A. Maura, Esq.

Luis F. Quesada Machado, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Ayala Law, P.A.

1390 Brickell Ave, Ste 335

Miami, FL 33131

Telephone: 305-570-2208

Email: eayala@ayalalawpa.com

By: /s/ Eduardo A. Maura

Eduardo A. Maura

Florida Bar No. 91303

Case 1:20-cv-22744-FAM Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

PROOF OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by email on July 13, 2020

on all counsel or parties of record.

By: /s/ Eduardo A. Maura

Eduardo A. Maura

Florida Bar No. 91303

Case 1:20-cv-22744-FAM Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Willbros Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
F. Curran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael F. Curran
---------------------------
Michael F. Curran
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2003
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Weir Farm
National Historical Park
Connecticut


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Climate Change
 The relationship beween climate and humans is complex. At Weir Farm, climate is responsible for changing seasons, plant and animal patterns, and how people throughout history and today have lived and thrived here. Now, however, the climate is changing in rapid and unpredictable ways. As a caretaker for natural and historical resources alike, Weir Farm is working to understand, mitigate, and adapt to this pressing challenge. 
Climate change is all around us. While you may not see receeding glaciers or rising sea levels at Weir Farm, a changing climate has significant implications on our temperate forests, our historic buildings and collections, and even people's health and wellbeing. 
Explore the links below to learn how Weir Farm, the Northeast region, and the whole National Park Service are addressing climate change.

a misty forest with leaves on the ground and yellow and red leave on trees.Climate Change and the NPS
A brown spotted butterfly sits on bright purple flowers. Northeast Temperate Network
a child leans over a white pin filled with water and material next to a large pond. Citizen Science at Weir Farm
 Last updated: December 29, 2023
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 735 Nod Hill Road
Wilton,
CT
06897
 Phone: 203 834-1896
x0 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Philip Gay,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Grill Concepts, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 30, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Grill
Concepts, Inc.



By:

/s/ Philip GayName:

Philip GayTitle:

CEO and Principal Executive OfficerMay 19, 2008
§ 4750.3-3 Supporting information and certification for private maintenance of more than 4 wild horses or burros. ( a ) An individual applying to adopt more than 4 wild horses or burros within a 12-month period, or an individual or group of individuals requesting to maintain more than 4 wild horses or burros at a single location shall provide a written report prepared by the authorized officer, or by a local humane official, veterinarian, cooperative extension agent, or similarly qualified person approved by the authorized officer, verifying that the applicant's facilities have been inspected, appear adequate to care for the number of animals requested, and satisfy the requirements contained in § 4750.3-2(a). ( 1 ) The report shall include a description of the facilities, including corral sizes, pasture size, and shelter, barn, or stall dimensions, and shall note any discrepancies between the facilities inspected and representations made in the application form.
( 2 ) When an applicant requests 25 or more animals or when 25 or more animals will be maintained at any single location regardless of the number of applicants, the facilities for maintaining the adopted animals shall be inspected by the authorized officer prior to approving the application.
( b ) The Bureau of Land Management will not allow the use of a power of attorney or any other instrument or writing authorizing one person to act as an agent for another in the adoption of wild horses and burros.
[51 FR 7414, Mar. 3, 1986, as amended at 55 FR 39152, Sept. 25, 1990; 63 FR 18340, Apr. 15, 1998]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<CAPTION>
<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,965
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               3
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     15,606
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           4,998
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             4,999
<LOANS>                                        630,422
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 696,462
<DEPOSITS>                                     511,183
<SHORT-TERM>                                    26,050
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,141
<LONG-TERM>                                     83,145
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            79
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 696,462
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,839
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  605
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,444
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,893
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,475
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,969
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       84
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,061
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,652
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,652
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.17
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,320
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,450
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,189
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                        14
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,287
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,009
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            278
        

</TABLE>
#### Michael O’Grady, Appellant, v. Charles W. Hanson, as President of the District Council of New York City of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Respondent.

Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
#### Drurie S. Sanford, Appellant, *v.*Frieda Hart and Jeannette C. Jeffe, Respondents, Impleaded with Max M. Hart and M. M. Hart, Inc., Defendants.

Appeal from part of a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 10th day of December, 1914, entered upon a decision after a trial at Special Term.

Per Curiam:

The complaint alleged a cause of action against the defendant Max M. Hart, individually, for the recovery of a sum of money, and the defendant Max M. Hart, not having answered that complaint, is in default, and the plaintiff is entitled, as matter of right, upon that default, to relief as against the defendant Max M. Hart, individually. We are entirely satisfied with the disposition by the trial judge of the cause of action alleged against Frieda Hart and Jeannette C. Jeffe. The judgment appealed from must be modified by directing a recovery against M. M. Hart (Inc.), and Max M. Hart, individually, for the sum of $2,808.50, and as so modified the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the defendants Frieda Hart and Jeannette C. Jeffe as against the plaintiff. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with costs to defendants Frieda Hart and Jeannette C. Jeffe as against the plaintiff. Order to be settled on notice.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DEVLIN JAKE JONES, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 81 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 4.422

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182094 dated July 03, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Local telephone communication services, excluding local telephone communication services using coin-box telephones and public access services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until July 03, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 06, 2020 No. 145-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ A.A.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here

Official seal:
    MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
   OF COMMUNICATIONS,
   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119152