alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCGrant OpportunitiesGrant Awards

# Grant Awards - 2013

On this page:
        - FY13 Faculty Development Grant Program Awards
        - FY13 Minority Serving Institutions Program
        - FY13 Scholarship and Fellowship Grant Program Awards
        - FY13 Trade School and Community College Grant Program Awards

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

## FY13 Faculty Development Grant Program Awards

## FY13 Minority Serving Institutions Program

## FY13 Scholarship and Fellowship Grant Program Awards

## FY13 Trade School and Community College Grant Program Awards

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 20, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024 FOA Awards
          - 2023 FOA Awards
          - 2022 FOA Awards
          - 2021 FOA Awards
          - 2020 FOA Awards
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2009
          - 2010
          - 2011
          - 2012
          - 2013
          - 2014
          - 2015
          - Success Stories

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 20, 2020
#### Hugh L. Cameron, Respondent, v. Alfred Stark et al., Appellants. (Action No. 2.)

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial unless said plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to $4,000. Settle order on notice.
CO U RT M IN UTES Page 5

M agistrate Judge Edw in G. Torres

King Building Eourtroom 10-5 Date: 2/24/20 Time: 10:00 a.m.

Defendant: Felipe Moncaleano Botero J#: 20859-104 Case #: 20-2228-O'SULLIVAN (SEALED)

AUSA: C.>-w.J,htce Vt +.% v Attorney: Fernando Tamayo, Temporary Counsel

Violation: Conspiracy to Laun er Bribery Proceeds in U.S. Currency Through Bank Accounts

Proceeding: Report RE: Counsel, Pretrial Detention CJA Appt:

Bond/PTD Held: Yes C No Recommended Bond:

Co-signed by:

nr surrenderand/ordo notobtain passports/travel docs Language: English

C Report to PTS as directed/or x's a week/month by Disposition:

phone: x's a week/month in person CASE REM A I NS SEALE D

ns Random urine testing by Pretrial Services **prel/Arr 3/3/20**

R

Treatment as deemed necessary - é. (j

r Refrain from excessive use of alcohol

Rr Participate in mental health assessment & treatment .-. ggg ks os ;

Rr Maintain or seek full-time employment/education - 47

Rr No contact with victims/witnesses x

Nr N o f i r e a r m s vzRr Not to encumber property x s &

Rr May not visit transportation establishments

Home Confinement/Electronic Monitoring and/or

Curfew pm to am, paid by

Allowances: M edical needs, court appearances, attorney visits,

religious, em ploym ent

nr Travel extended to: '

Nr other: from Speedy Trial clock

NEXT EOURT APPEARANCE Date: Tim e: Jud e: Plate:

Re ort RE counse . Qa 7T' ApTD Bond Hearing: D W.eprelim/Arraign or Removal:

status conference RE:

D.A.R. / j ) ()0 : D t/ Time in court: $ ( '

A X /AG knlxs Vlq' S- LVJ

Case 1:20-cr-20175-JEM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2020 Page 1 of 1
#### § 150.1 Background and purpose.

The regulations in this part are issued under the authority of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 (the Act), 15 U.S.C. 2201 *et seq.* The Act establishes two classes of honorary awards for public safety officers and directs the issuance of the necessary joint regulations by the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Attorney General. The functions of the Secretary of Commerce were transferred by Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978 to the Administrator , FEMA. Since initial passage of the Act, civil defense functions which then were delegated to the Secretary of Defense have been delegated to theAdministrator, FEMA. Section 15 of the Act has been amended to delete the Secretary of Defense from participating in the granting of awards. *See* Public Law 98-241, 98 Stat. 95, 96 (1984). The Administrator , FEMA, and the Attorney General are issuing this regulation to implement the statutory provisions for FEMA and the Department of Justice.
#### Henry C. Staubitz, Respondent, v. International Railway Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the verdict is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence on the question of defendant’s negligence. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and Robson, J., who dissented. •
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,170,486
<SECURITIES>                                 6,558,430
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,319,173
<ALLOWANCES>                                   260,729
<INVENTORY>                                  4,253,590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,756,354
<PP&E>                                      20,135,486
<DEPRECIATION>                            (13,084,981)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,667,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,305,172
<BONDS>                                      8,245,073
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       233,782
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,451,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,667,872
<SALES>                                      8,571,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,571,181
<CGS>                                        8,159,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,329,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               504,281
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               118,058
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             640,819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (13,421,987)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (13,421,987)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,421,987)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.62)
        

</TABLE>
#### American Wet Wash Laundry Company, Appellant, v. Harry Cooperman, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 453

**Question 453:** Note 2 of Appendix B provides criteria for determining the appropriate derived air concentration (DAC) for a mixture of radionuclides where "the identity of each radionuclide in the mixture is not known, but it is known that certain radionuclides are not present in the mixture." In §20.1204, Determination of Internal Exposure, provisions are made to disregard the concentration of any radionuclide that is less than 10% of its DAC so long as the sum of the percentages for all of the radionuclides disregarded in the mixture does not exceed 30%. Can this approach of disregarding certain radionuclides be applied to the determination of the appropriate DAC, as outlined in note 2 to Appendix B; in other words, can radionuclides that are not present in the mixture in concentrations greater than or equal to 10% of its DAC be disregarded so long as the sum of the percentages for all of the radionuclides disregarded in the mixture does not exceed 30%? This question is intended to affirm a practical approach to truncating the analysis of radionuclide mixtures by disregarding radionuclides that are not present or may only be present in insignificant concentrations relative to other radionuclides in a mixture.

**Answer:** No. This would be a misapplication of the provisions of 10 CFR 20.1204 (g), which applies to the determination of internal exposure under specified circumstances, not to the choice of the appropriate DAC for a mixture. See the following related questions and answers: Question #121 and answer in section 10 CFR 20.1204 which clarifies the meaning of "total activity" in 10 CFR 20.1204 (g) and provides an example of the proper use of this provision of Part 20; Question 403 and answer in section 10 CFR 20.2106 which concerns the relevance of 10 CFR 20.1202 (b) (3) and 20.1204 (g) to a cutoff levels for radionuclides contributing to the CEDE; and Question 146 and answer in section 10 CFR 20 Appendix B which indicates that the definition of the term "not present" in old Part 20 does not apply to the revised Part 20.

(References: 10 CFR 20 Appendix B, 10 CFR 20.1202, 10 CFR 20.1204)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 126

**Question 126:** Individuals performing assigned duties are often exposed to small amounts of radiation from plant effluents at licensees' sites under normal operating conditions. 
> 
(a) If these individuals are likely to receive, or have already received, in excess of 10% of an occupational dose limit from external sources, does the licensee have to determine, record, and report doses from the effluents to comply with the revised Part 20? 

(b) If so, what are the monitoring thresholds for the external and internal components of the dose?

**Answer:**
> 
(a) Yes. In this case, the licensee would have to monitor and record the external dose from the effluents, since the individuals are in excess of 10% of the occupational dose limit from all external sources 20.1502(a)). However, the licensee is not required to monitor the effluent dose separately from other external doses.

(b) The licensee must monitor and record the internal occupational dose only if the individuals are likely to receive in excess of 10% of the applicable ALIs from all occupational intakes of radioactive material. Note: For nuclear power plants, the preceding answer does not mean that all workers for whom monitoring of external dose is required must wear their personal dosimeters at all times while on site. Such workers in controlled areas (outside restricted areas) need not wear personal dosimeters to measure external doses from effluents. However, they should wear personal dosimeters in a controlled area when performing work that has the potential for significant occupational exposure such as performing a radiation survey of a vehicle loaded with a shipment of radioactive material.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1502)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017
USGS Publications Warehouse - Citation View 

USGS Publications Warehouse 1 of 3 
Publication Citation

Online Document Versions

View index pageView document

USGS Store

Currently unavailable through the USGSStore.

Publication Type USGS Numbered SeriesTitle Alaska resource data file; Christian QuadrangleAuthor Dover, J. H.Year 1997Series Open-File ReportSeries Number 97-294Edition -Language ENGLISHPublisher The Survey,ISSN 0094-9140Description 6 p.USGS Library CallNumber (200) R29o no.97-294 INTERNET

USGS Publications Warehouse 2 of 3 
Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/Page Contact Information: Contact the Pubs Warehouse TeamPage Last modified: 12/07/2011 15:03:41

USGS Publications Warehouse 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1: CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

            In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of Magna-Lab, Inc. for the quarter and nine months ended November 30, 2003, the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

            (1)   such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter and nine
                  months ended November 30, 2003 fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
                  10-QSB for the quarter and nine months ended November 30, 2003
                  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                  condition and results of operations of Magna-Lab, Inc.


      January 13, 2004                            /s/ John R. Geisel
                                                  ------------------
                                                  Name: John Geisel
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer


                                       20
22.004759
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melvin MOTA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40828.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Melvin Mota appeals his conviction and sentence for being illegally present in this country following a deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Mota challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be *315found by a jury in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Mota’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Mota contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Mota properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Joseph Kellner, Appellant, v. Emil Kaufman et al., Respondents.

Mo opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
#### Murray Storch, Appellant, v. Board of Education of the City of New York et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
HomeAbout NRCGrant OpportunitiesGrant Awards

# Grant Awards - 2012

On this page:
        - FY12 Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) Financial Assistance Program Awards
        - FY12 Minority Serving Institutions Grant Program Awards
        - Success Stories

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

## FY12 Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) Financial Assistance Program Awards

## FY12 Minority Serving Institutions Grant Program Awards

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 20, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024 FOA Awards
          - 2023 FOA Awards
          - 2022 FOA Awards
          - 2021 FOA Awards
          - 2020 FOA Awards
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2009
          - 2010
          - 2011
          - 2012
          - 2013
          - 2014
          - 2015
          - Success Stories

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 20, 2020
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.618 How are awards paid?

If you are seeking payment of an award, you must submit a copy of the final decision, along with your certification that you are not seeking judicial review of either the decision in the adversary adjudication, or of the award, to the following address: Chief Financial Officer, Office of Financial Operations, SBA, P.O. Box 205, Denver, CO 80201-0205. SBA will pay you the amount awarded within 60 days of receipt of your request unless it is notified that you or another party has sought judicial review of the underlying decision or the award.
## "EF^RTMENTO F ^KANSPORIATIO N 

## vCKE TOFEafflON S M Fl- e I 5 P J - Februar y8 , 201 2 U.S . Dept . n fTransportatio n Docke tNo . FAA-2DI2-D08 3 r I2D D Ne wJerse yAve . S E Wes tBuildin g Gran d Floor , Roo m W-I20I4 D Washington . D

C 2059 D T o Who m I t Ma

yConcern : I' m writin g o n behal fo fSu n Countr yAirline s regardin g th e nonsto p Lansing-t o Washington , D.C . route . I liv e nea rLansin g an d depen d o n thi s particula rfligh tt a trave l t o Washingto n frequently . I t i s quick , convenient , an d affordable . Thei rservic e i s superio rt o none . No tonl yi s thi s a grea tfligh tfa rme , i t als o afford s m yfamil yt o fl yan d se e me . Thi s wil l en d i fthi s fligh toptio n disappears . Lansin g i s th e Capito l o fMichiga n an d i t i s use d b you rStat e governmen tt o trave l t o an d fro m Lansin g an d DC . Th e airpor t i n Lansin g ha s bee n workin g diligentl yfo ryear s t o becom e a hu b fo rtravelers : providin g direc tflight s tha tar e affordable . Th e flight s I hav e bee n o n hav e alway s bee n hjll . Wha ttha tdoe s fo rou rloca l an d stat e econom ycan' tb e described . T o g o bac k t o no t havin g thi s fligh toptio n i s unfathomable . ' I . - I t cut s m yfligh ttim e h'o m aroun d G hr s wit h stop s t o 2. 5 hr s nonstop , (includin g layovers , driving , arriva l tim e etc. ) 2 . I t I s affordable . 3 . Su n Country' s servic e i s superior . 4 . Convenience . Thi s i s HDGE!! ! ijus tcan' tbeliev e tha ti n thi s da yan d ag e tha ti t woul d b e possibl e t o tak e step s backwar d an d no t hav e a Capita l cit yhave a direc tfligh tt o ou rNation' s Capitol . I d o understan d th e legalities , bu t instea d o fsimpl ytakin g thes e slot s away , wh yno t d o wha tshoul d hav e bee n don e i n th e firs tplac e - creat e th e slots . Don' t penaliz e th e peopl e tha tdepen d o n thi s fligh t route : don' tpenaliz e Su n Country . A s lon g a s i t i s saf e t o fl yi n an d ou t o fReaga n Airport : whic h I understan d i t is . pleas e allo wthi s exemptio n an d creat e th e slots . Du rcommunit yi s dependin g o n yo u t o mak e th e correc t decisio n an d resolv e thi s crisi s b yawardin g Su n Countr yth e - require d slot s t o continu e it s Lansing/Reaga n Airport-D C route . W e implor e yo u t o hea rou rvoice . DEonR.A)rtelh- /

•: / , ] •;r. - draxtellgniail.co m -••. . '

••.y^(^^\<^ ^

.'•(-:.; . y^n - :•[• : p:..; - 517-634-^23 3 .'><^-;CV > '
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-51116, 33-39557, 33-39566, and 333-17843)pertaining to the Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan, the Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Officer Bonus Program, the Amended, Restated and Substituted Kaiser Steel Resources, Inc. 1989 Stock Plan, and the Kaiser Ventures Inc. 1995Stock Plan, as amended, respectively, of our report dated February 12, 2004 (except for Note 2 – *Environmental Insurance and Environmental Remediation Liabilities*, Notes 9 and 12, and Note 18 – *Environmental Contingencies,*asto which the date is November 12, 2004), with respect to the statements of operations, cash flows, and changes in members’ equity of Kaiser Ventures LLC and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003 included in the Annual Report (Form10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

 

Orange County, California

April 11, 2005
----

Removal from the register of Case C-338/03 (1)

(2005/C 296/36)

(Language of the case: Italian)

By order of 14 July 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-338/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Civile e Penale di Perugia): in criminal proceedings against Rosario Alessandrello, Vicenzo Biccari, Daniel Buaron.

----

(1)OJ C 264, 1.11.2003.

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 2:20-CV-14186-ROSENBERG/MAYNARD 

DAVID POSCHMANN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STUART NORTH, LLC, 

Defendant. 

_______________________________/ 

ORDER CLOSING CASE 

This cause comes before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with 

Prejudice. DE 13. In light of the fact that this case has been dismissed, it is ORDERED AND 

ADJUDGED that: 

1. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, all hearings are CANCELLED,

and all deadlines are TERMINATED. 

2. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to CLOSE THIS CASE. 

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, West Palm Beach, Florida, this 20th day of 

August, 2020. 

 _______________________________ 

 ROBIN L. ROSENBERG 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record 

Case 2:20-cv-14186-RLR Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/20/2020 Page 1 of 1
Order entered May 21, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00435-CV

MY VACATION EUROPE, INC., Appellant

V.

CONNIE SIGEL, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-06937-E

ORDER

Because the clerk’s record filed electronically April 18, 2014 is defective and a corrected 

record was filed May 13, 2014, we STRIKE the April 18th record from the record of this cause.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE