alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 30

**Question 30:** If a license condition ties the licensee to a section in the old Part 20 and there is no corresponding section in the revised Part 20, does the requirement in the old Part 20 stay in effect after implementation of the revised Part 20.

**Answer:** Yes. See 10 CFR 20.1008 (e). The license condition that ties the licensee to a section in the old Part 20 "remains in force until there is a technical specification change, license amendment, or a license renewal that modifies or removes this condition."

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1008 (e))

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 24, 2017
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60978-60979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23007]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    DOC has submitted to the Office for Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-
13.
    Bureau: International Trade Administration.
    Title: SABIT: Applications and Questionnaires.
    Agency Form Number: ITA-4143P-5.
    OMB Number: 0625-0225.
    Type of Request: Regular Submission.
    Burden: 5988 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 2370.
    Avg. Hours Per Response: 4 hour per participant.
    Needs and Uses: The Department of Commerce, International Trade 
Administration, SABIT Office supports technical assistance and training 
for professionals from Eurasia, while promoting information exchange 
and

[[Page 60979]]

U.S.-Eurasian partnerships. Since inception SABIT has trained over 3300 
professionals from Eurasia.
    The Applications and Questionnaires are utilized by SABIT staff to 
evaluate and select the most qualified intern candidates and host 
companies to participate in the Grant and Group programs. In addition, 
staff is able to implement changes and measure the effectiveness of the 
program by the responses collected.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other non-profit, individuals (non-
U.S. citizens, SABIT staff).
    Frequency: Periodic.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required. In order to participate in the 
SABIT Programs, applications need to be completed.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-7340.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, 
Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th & Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f397bb8a9d9698b3979c90dd949c85"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0c4e8d9cec5cbe0c4cfc38ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be e-mailed to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91d5f0e7f8f5cec3fee2e5faf4e3d1fefcf3bff4fee1bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1054716679744f427f63647b7562507f7d723e757f603e777f66">[email protected]</span></a> or fax 
(202) 395-7285 within 30 days of the publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register.

    Dated: October 7, 2004.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-23007 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-HE-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 400.209 Funding for the Program.

The Act provides funding for the costs incurred by the Government as a result of granting Guarantees under the Program. While pursuing the goals of the Act, it is the intent of the Board to minimize the cost of the Program to the Government. The Board will estimate the risk posed by the guaranteed loans to the funds appropriated for the costs of the Guarantees under the Program and operate the Program accordingly.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5260 

To define ‘‘obscenity’’ for purposes of the Communications Act of 1934, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2022 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To define ‘‘obscenity’’ for purposes of the Communications 

Act of 1934, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Interstate Obscenity 

5 Definition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINING OBSCENITY. 

7 (a) DEFINITION.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 3 of the Commu9 nications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 153) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5260 IS

1 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (38) 

2 through (59) as paragraphs (39) through (60), 

3 respectively; and 

4 (B) by inserting after paragraph (37) the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(38) OBSCENE; OBSCENITY.— 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘obscene’ or 

8 ‘obscenity’, when used in a manner or context 

9 that explicitly refers to, or could apply to, a pic10 ture, image, graphic image file, film, videotape, 

11 or other visual depiction, includes a picture, 

12 image, graphic image file, film, videotape, or 

13 other visual depiction that— 

14 ‘‘(i) taken as a whole, appeals to the 

15 prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excre16 tion; 

17 ‘‘(ii) depicts, describes, or represents, 

18 an actual or simulated sexual act or sexual 

19 contact, actual or simulated normal or per20 verted sexual acts, or lewd exhibition of the 

21 genitals, with the objective intent to 

22 arouse, titillate, or gratify the sexual de23 sires of a person; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5260 IS

1 ‘‘(iii) taken as a whole, lacks serious 

2 literary, artistic, political, or scientific 

3 value. 

4 ‘‘(B) SEXUAL ACT; SEXUAL CONTACT.— 

5 For purposes of subparagraph (A), the terms 

6 ‘sexual act’ and ‘sexual contact’ have the mean7 ings given those terms in section 2246 of title 

8 18, United States Code.’’. 

9 (2) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMEND10 MENT.—Section 271(c)(1)(A) of the Communica11 tions Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 271(c)(1)(A)) is 

12 amended by striking ‘‘section 3(47)(A)’’ and insert13 ing ‘‘section 3(55)(A)’’. 

14 (b) OBSCENE OR HARASSING TELEPHONE CALLS IN

15 THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OR IN INTERSTATE OR FOR16 EIGN COMMUNICATIONS.—Section 223(a)(1)(A) of the 

17 Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 223(a)(1)(A)) is 

18 amended, in the undesignated matter following clause (ii), 

19 by striking ‘‘, with intent to abuse, threaten, or harass 

20 another person’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 404

**Question 404:** NRC Form 5 (Item No. 10) provides for reporting of individual radionuclides involved in an intake. How does the NRC plan on using this data (i.e., what is the NRC's purpose in collecting this data)?

**Answer:** NRC Form 5 (Item 10) provides for recording / reporting of individual radionuclides involved in an intake because 10 CFR 20.2106, records of individual monitoring results, requires that the records include, when applicable, the estimated intake or body burden of radionuclides. There are several reasons for inclusion of intake information on Form 5. One reason is that if the internal dose models and weighting factors are changed at some future date, the NRC can recalculate the reported doses using the new models and weighting factors. Another reason, of benefit to licensees, is to make it possible for a licensee to determine the CDE to the maximally exposed organ for an individual who has organ doses reported from previous employers. For example, consider an individual, who, during a year, was employed by licensee A and received a CDE of 20 rem to the lung, then was employed by licensee B and received a CDE of 20 rem to the bone, and finally was employed by licensee C and received a CDE of 20 rem to the thyroid. NRC Form 5 does not provide a space for recording which organ is the maximally exposed organ (unless the "Comments" space is used for this purpose). In the absence of information on which organ was maximally exposed and on the intakes of individual radionuclides, the total CDE to the maximally exposed organ in this example would be considered to be the total of these three 20-rem doses (to different organs), or a total of 60 rem, which would appear to be a potential violation of the organ dose limit. With the individual radionuclide intake information, the CDE to the maximally exposed organ could be recalculated and very likely would be below the limit. The NRC will also use the intake data from some of the earlier reports to the NRC under revised Part 20 to recalculate the doses to ensure that the reported doses are reasonably consistent (within a factor of 2 or so). Finally, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements of revised Part 20 are consistent with implementing an NRC staff recommendation to establish a registry of radiation workers and their radiation doses. Such a registry will be of value for a number of reasons, one of which is to facilitate epidemiological studies of potential radiation-induced health effects. The inclusion of the radionuclide intake data in the dose records provides a better basis for these studies than records of dose alone. 

(References: 10 CFR 20.2106, 10 CFR 20.2206, Regulatory Guide 8.7)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, December 01, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

Case Number: 20-22406-CIV-MORENO

WINDY LUCIUS, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

HUNGRY HOWIE'S PIZZA AND SUBS, 

INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER

DENYING ALL PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with prejudice

(D.E. 13), filed on August 10, 2020. 

THE COURT has considered the notice and the pertinent portions of the record, and is 

otherwise fully advised in the premises. Defendant has neither answered the complaint nor moved 

for summary judgment. It is 

ADJUDGED that this Cause is DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party bearing its 

own fees and costs. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Further, all pending motions are DENIED 

as MOOT with leave to renew if appropriate. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 13th of August 2020.

______________________________________

FEDERICO A. MORENO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-22406-FAM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 1 of 1
### [§2647. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §402(29)(G), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3359]

Section, added Pub. L. 96–417, title III, §301, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1739; amended Pub. L. 98–573, title VI, §623(b)(2), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3041, related to precedence of cases.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1657 of this title.
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 40712 Su m m ar y Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. L UI S J AS S O B OT EL L O , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 5: 09- C R

- 325- 1
B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , C L E M E N T , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e att orneyapp oi n t ed to represent L u i s Jasso B ot el l o ha s m oved f or l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d er s v . Ca lif o rn ia , 38 6 U
. S. 7 38 ( 19 67 )
. Ja s s o Bot e l l o ha s no tf i l ed a r e s po ns e . Ouri nde pe nde nt r e v ie w o f th e re c o r d a n d co u n s e l’ s b r ie f d is c lo s e s n o n o n fr iv o lo u s i ssu e for a p p e a l. A ccor di n gl y, coun se l’ s m ot i on f or l eave to w i t h draw pu rsuan tt o A n d ers is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee5 T H C IR . R. 4 2
. 2
. C ou n sel’ s m oti on f or leav e to United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D May 4, 2010 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk Case: 09-40712 Document: 00511099502 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/04/2010N o. 09- 40712

2 w i t hdraw due t o hi s pos sibl e a ppoi nt m ent as a U ni t ed St at es M agi st r at e J udge i s D E N IE D as m oo t. Case: 09-40712 Document: 00511099502 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/04/2010
```

[109th Congress Public Law 5]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ005.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 19]]

Public Law 109-5
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To extend the existence of the Nazi War Crimes and Japanese Imperial 
 Government Records Interagency Working Group for 2 years. <<NOTE: Mar. 
                         25, 2005 -  [S. 384]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF WORKING <<NOTE: 5 USC 552 
            note.>> GROUP.

    Section 802(b)(1) of the Japanese Imperial Government Disclosure Act 
of 2000 (Public Law 106-567; 114 Stat. 2865) is amended by striking ``4 
years'' and inserting ``6 years''.

    Approved March 25, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 384:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Feb. 16, considered and passed Senate.
            Mar. 14, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC
WALKERAG SUPPLY, LLC, et al Complainants, 

### v. WAHOO AIRPORT AUTHORITY, WAHOO MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Respondents. FAADocketNo.16-14-08

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME
This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based onthe abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance withFAA Rules of Practicefor Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcementProceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuantto 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, the date by whichthe Director's Determinationwill be issued in this matter is hereby extendedto September 23, 2016. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case due to the complexity ofthe Record.

M nager, Airport Compliance DivisionCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFYthat on June 21, 2016, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe foregoing document addressed to: Agent for Complainants: Mr. William Foster Better Airports, LLC 4504 NorthVersailles Avenue Dallas, Texas 75205
Counsel for Respondents: Mr. Larry S. Kaplan Mr. Keith Yarnaguchi Kaplan, Massamillo & Andrews, LLC 200 West Madison Street 16th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60606 Copies to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAAAirport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100 FAA Central Region, ACE-600

Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund IV, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the
three month period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the
Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMS                                
|-------------------------------------------------------
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial Officer May 9, 2003
#### Harry Kirshman, Doing Business as Kirshman Bros., Respondent, v. Crawford-Plummer Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mo opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management   

          - [ES-960-1430-BJ ES-052327, Group No. 25, Mississippi]   

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.   

# ACTION:

Notice of filing of plat of survey; Mississippi. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                       

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.   

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.   

The lands we surveyed are:   

## Choctaw Meridian, Mississippi   

T. 12 N., R. 13 E.

The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a portion of the east boundary, a portion of the subdivisional lines, the survey of the subdivision of section 12 and the metes and bounds survey of the Choctaw Indian Reservation boundary in section 12 in Township 12 North, Range 13 East, Choctaw Meridian, Mississippi, and was accepted on August 19, 2004.   

We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It will be made available to the public as a matter of information.   

Date: August 19, 2004.   

Stephen D. Douglas,   

Chief Cadastral Surveyor.   

[FR Doc. 04-22808 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]   

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
119 STAT. 374 PUBLIC LAW 109–31—JULY 12, 2005

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1524:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Apr. 26, considered and passed House.

June 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–31

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 12433

Antioch Road in Overland Park, Kansas, as the ‘‘Ed Eilert Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

12433 Antioch Road in Overland Park, Kansas, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Ed Eilert Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ed Eilert

Post Office Building’’.

Approved July 12, 2005.

July 12, 2005

[H.R. 1524]