alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
CYCLO3PSS CORPORATION'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         $2,453,163
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,450
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    295,973
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,870,643
<PP&E>                                         493,579
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,559,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          442,514
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    370
<COMMON>                                       11,775
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,742,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,559,656
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,925
<CGS>                                          51,311
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  625,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               502,357
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (39,449)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (532,286)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (532,285)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Ohio Shakers

Activity FeeYes

## ** Tags

            -  shakers 
            -  american utopias 
            -  ohio 
            -  national register of historic places 
            -  travel itineraries 
            -  travel shaker trail 

Photo by Jose Kozan

Visitors to, or residents of, Ohio may want to check out that state’s two Shaker settlements - North Union Shaker Site and White Water Shaker Village.North Union Shaker Site is managed by the Shaker Historical Society. Visitors are able to learn about the history and development of the site. They also hold special events that people can participate in.White Water Shaker Village is managed by Friends of White Water Shaker Village, Inc. Their mission is to preserve buildings and artifacts from the Village, and provide interpretation to visitors. They also hold several events and workshops throughout the year.

## ** Tags

        -  shakers 
        -  american utopias 
        -  ohio 
        -  national register of historic places 
        -  travel itineraries 
        -  travel shaker trail 

Last updated: February 28, 2018

----

National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the Interior

          -  Accessibility 
          -  Privacy Policy 
          -  FOIA 
          -  Notices 
          -  Contact The National Park Service 
          -  NPS FAQ 
          -  No Fear Act 
          -  Disclaimer 
          -  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 
          -  USA.gov 
          -  Facebook 
          -  Youtube 
          -  Twitter 
          -  Instagram 
          -  Flickr
#### Sanford Alper et al. v. Greater New York Broadcasting Corporation.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 425

**Question 425:** It appears that some of the oral ingestion ALIs in Appendix B of 10 CFR 20 are sometimes associated with the wrong chemical forms; is this the case?

**Answer:** No. See the answer to Question 71 in section 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B which indicates that the "Class" column of 10 CFR Appendix B applies to inhalation only; it does not refer to ingestion. In other words, neither the D, W, and Y classes nor the chemical forms (compounds) in the "Class" column refer to the ingestion ALIs.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20 Appendix B)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0110 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 -NM - 148 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.396 What is the term of the loan?

The loan must not exceed sixty (60) months plus the estimated time to complete construction or rehabilitation.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4691 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4691

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to equalize the charitable 
              mileage rate with the business travel rate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2022

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Ms. Smith) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to equalize the charitable 
              mileage rate with the business travel rate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Volunteer Driver Tax Parity Act of 
2022''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CHARITABLE MILEAGE RATE.

    (a) In General.--Section 170(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended to read as follows:
    ``(i) Standard Mileage Rate for Use of Passenger Automobile.--
            ``(1) In general.--For purposes of computing the deduction 
        under this section for use of a passenger automobile, the 
        standard mileage rate shall be--
                    ``(A) during any taxable year beginning after 
                December 31, 2021, and before January 1, 2024, the 
                standard mileage rate with respect to use of a 
                passenger automobile for purposes of determining the 
                deduction allowable under sections 162 and 212, and
                    ``(B) during any taxable year beginning after 
                December 31, 2023, 24 cents per mile.
            ``(2) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any taxable 
        year beginning in a calendar year after 2024, the 24 cents 
        amount in paragraph (1)(B)(ii) shall be increased by an amount 
        equal to--
                    ``(A) 24 cents, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, determined by substituting 
                `calendar year 2023' for `calendar year 2016' in 
                subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof.
        Any increase determined under the preceding sentence which is 
        not a multiple of 1 cent shall be rounded to the nearest 
        multiple of 1 cent.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of **CHINA DIGITAL COMMUNICATION GROUP** (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Yi
Bo Sun, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
 
 Dated
this 21st day of April, 2005.
 /s/
      Yi Bo SunYi
      Bo SunChief
      Executive Officer
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

White Sands
National ParkNew Mexico
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of New Energy Systems Group, (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K/A for year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Junfeng Chen, Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: June 6, 2011

/s/ Junfeng ChenJunfeng ChenChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skynet Telematics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB, for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mark Dingley, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Mark Dingley
-----------------------
    Mark Dingley
    Chief Financial Officer

April 30, 2007


<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.1
​
200 Park Avenue Partners, LLC
14 Elm Place, Suite 206
Rye, NY 10580
​
May 27, 2021
​
890 5th Avenue Partners, Inc.
14 Elm Place, Suite 206
Rye, NY 10580
​
This letter is to confirm the undersigned’s commitment that, through January 14, 2023, which date is the scheduled liquidation date of 890 5th Avenue Partners, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), if the Company is unable to complete a business combination prior to such date, to the extent that funds are needed by the Company and upon request by the Company, the undersigned will provide to the Company loans in an aggregate amount of up to $1,600,000.
​
These loans will be non-interest bearing and unsecured, and upon the consummation of a business combination, at our option, will either (a) be repaid or (b) with respect to up to $1,500,000 of such loans, may be convertible into units of the post-business combination entity at a price of $10.00 per unit (such units to be identical to the private placement units sold by the Company concurrently with its initial public offering).
​
The undersigned understands that if the Company does not consummate a business combination (as described in the Company’s prospectus, dated January 11, 2021), all amounts loaned to the Company hereunder will be forgiven except to the extent that the Company has funds available to it outside of its trust account established in connection with the Company’s initial public offering.
​
Sincerely,
​
200 PARK AVENUE PARTNERS, LLC
​
	By:
	/s/ Adam Rothstein
	​

	Name: 
	Adam Rothstein
	​

	Title:
	Manager
	​



​
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Victor Garity, Appellant.

The appellant was convicted of several felonies after trial in 1941, and is serving the sentence imposed by the judgment. The present motion is construed, as in *coram nobis,*to set aside the judgment on the ground that the conviction was had solely because of the known use of perjured testimony, etc. Order of the County Court, Queens County, denying the motion, affirmed. Ho opinion. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Order entered August 1 5 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00220
- CR VERNON M. GRAVES, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. F 11
- 19018
- P



### O RDER Appellant has filed an August 1, 2013 objection to the record on appeal in which appellant contends the record does not contain the trial court’s sentencing. A review of the reporter’s record shows volume three contains the complete sentencing hearing with the oral pronouncement of sentence on pages 26

– 27. Accordingly, appellant’s objection to the record is DENIED

.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateStandards Development

# Contact Us About Standards Development

For answers to many frequently asked questions see our Standards Development pages. If after reviewing these pages you wish to send us a comment a question, please complete the following form.

If you need to report a safety concern, please do not use this page. Instead, please see Report a Safety or Security Concern.

Would you like to remain anonymous?:*

YesNo

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 7, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Standards Development Organizations
          - SDO Coordinator List
          - Consensus, Industry, and International Standards Used by NRC
          - Reference Documents
          - Contact Us
          - NRC Standards Forum

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 7, 2020
### Part A—Employment and Training Programs for Native Americans and Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers
No: IV-22-014 November 22, 2022

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 610-337-5330

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at the Cooper Nuclear Station

The NRC has selected Kent Chambliss as the new senior resident 

inspector at the Cooper Nuclear Station in Brownville, Nebraska.

Chambliss joined the NRC in 2020 and has served as resident inspector at 

Cooper since August 2021. Prior to that, he served with the U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers in Japan and Colorado and worked at the DUF6 Conversion Facility in 

Piketon, Ohio. Chambliss is a veteran of the U.S. Navy, where he served for nine 

years as a submarine officer.

“Kent’s military experience onboard a nuclear submarine and at a fuel conversion facility 

gives him a broad base of knowledge to draw upon during his day-to-day activities. He has the kind 

of background and dedication to the NRC mission that will enable him to carefully monitor 

operations at the plant, for which he already is familiar,” said NRC Region IV Administrator Scott 

Morris.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. 

They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring 

significant work projects, and interacting with plant workers and the public.
#### Leander B. Faber, as Receiver in Supplementary Proceedings of Patrick H. Flynn, Judgment Debtor, Respondent, v. Everett Greene, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Mo opinion. Burr, Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
-cr-06218-NCR Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2000 P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 473

 472

 475

 487

 486

 482

 486

 487

 486

 493

 491

 496

 492

 484

 487

 482

 487

 488

 485

 486

 484

 483

 483

 488

 486

 494

 487

 492

 492

 506

 462

 462

 463

 461

 472

 472

 471

 470

 472

 474

 471

 472

 471

 469

 469

 468

 470

 470

 470

 468

 466

 465

 465

 470

 474

 474

 471

 472

 480

 486

 465

 466

 466

 471

 477

 476

 476

 476

 477

 479

 480

 480

 478

 475

 475

 473

 475

 475

 476

 475

 472

 471

 471

 476

 479

 481

 477

 482

 487

 493

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 1, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, Respondent-Appellant, against William W. Mills et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, et al., Appellants-Respondents. [Nassau, William, Liberty, Cedar Sts., Block 45, Lots 5, 7, 11, Borough of Manhattan.]

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,297
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,653
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (965)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         102,110
<DEPRECIATION>                                (49,657)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         23,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,011
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,530
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,073
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   716
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 836
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,896
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,896
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,896
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.43


</TABLE>
i 1.1,

Ibaftrr <Df= e/ZzM-ztJArL-apfg&cjl AttaJi >4/3£Z- /koS-^r, OU8Z~l<^ f.Otfboy: ./2.3QJ 

### JAu-^Tg^,-7K. 7X7/7 J?o MA/ <^o/s~
-e9ORT-0F-eRIMINAt-APPE«LT ^——MAY-26-1015 Ab©!Aeosia,Cterk Re: Reax^einrzduc^ tccKg-r sheet f=p/^ p-zuzUts

### TyX1£& /WQ D<Ehi-zAt-OATe^ Or fe»0. Nfo, /2-/3rvr; &>A~ Mo, 09-/3-40240- Qg> g£r^ A?£, /46€uAC66t/^^ 

### X/H CuRfi^Jnty PtlUzU&~ m/ ARzr. t(.o7

t&?&?. Or t*iy. fk-Ttrrzehl PbR. T>isoze-ri*^/^Y U)AhiKA4&' Ycuu Tb&~. Vcuu^ Itxap. /Wo Attt&T-