alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Manufacturing Flow Sheet ( CBI )PMN P.9 PMN P.9aSectionA-2 SectionA-3ExposureRelease &Disposal 

# TS-G050GW 

# Attachment 4

Pa g e 1/1CBI
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateCRGR ReviewsResults of Previous CRGR Reviews

# Results of Previous CRGR Reviews – 2020

For more information, Contact Us About The Committee To Review Generic Requirements (CRGR).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, February 23, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, February 23, 2021
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Southern District of Florida

ERIK CHAVEZ, individually and on behalf of others 

similarly situated, 20-cv-22603-MGC

GRILL ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Florida limited liability 

company, d/b/a "Los Parrilleros" and "Parrilleros 

Tavern," and RUBEN SIERRA, individually

RUBEN SIERRA 

10775 NW 41st Street 

Doral, FL 33178

Anthony F. Sanchez 

Anthony F. Sanchez, P.A. 

6701 Sunset Drive, Suite 101 

Miami, Florida 33143 

Tel.: 305-665-9211 

Fax: 305-328-4842

06/23/2020 s/ Esperanza Buchhorst

Case 1:20-cv-22603-JG Document 3-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 1 of 1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPosition control of redundant manipulators using an adaptive error-based control schemeA Cartesian-space control scheme is developed to control the motion of kinematically redundant manipulators with 7 degrees of freedom (DOF). The control scheme consists mainly of proportional derivative (PD) controllers whose gains are adjusted by an adaptation law driven by the errors between the desired and actual trajectories. The adaptation law is derived using the concept of model reference adaptive control (MRAC) and Lyapunov direct method under the assumption that the manipulator performs non-compliant and slowly-varying motions. The developed control scheme is computationally efficient because its implementation does not require the computation of the manipulator dynamics. Computer simulation performed to evaluate the control scheme performance is presented and discussed.Document ID19900017262Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsNguyen, Charles C.*(Catholic Univ. of America Washington, DC, United States)*Zhou, Zhen-Lei*(Catholic Univ. of America Washington, DC, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Subject CategoryCyberneticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186812NAS 1.26:186812Accession Number90N26578Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-1124Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017262.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Charles K. Harris, Respondent, v. Ted Snyder Company and Others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 4120.5-2 Cooperation with Tribal, state, county, and Federal agencies. Insofar as the programs and responsibilities of other agencies and units of government involve grazing upon the public lands and other lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management, or the livestock which graze thereon, the Bureau of Land Management will cooperate, to the extent consistent with applicable laws of the United States, with the involved agencies and government entities. The authorized officer will cooperate with Tribal, state, county, and Federal agencies in the administration of laws and regulations relating to livestock, livestock diseases, sanitation, and noxious weeds, including— ( a ) State cattle and sheep sanitary or brand boards in control of stray and unbranded livestock, to the extent such cooperation does not conflict with the Wild Free-Roaming Horse and Burro Act of 1971 (16 U.S.C. 1331 *et seq.*);
( b ) County or other local weed control districts in analyzing noxious weed problems and developing control programs for areas of the public lands and other lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management; and
( c ) Tribal, state, county, or local government-established grazing boards in reviewing range improvements and allotment management plans on public lands.
[60 FR 9965, Feb. 22, 1995, as amended at 71 FR 39505, July 12, 2006]
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 11.1

                       COMPUTATION OF NET (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                            Three Months Ended                                Nine Months Ended
                                                                 April 30                                         April 30        
                                                   ---------------------------------                          ----------------
                                                        1996                1997                1996                1997
                                                   -------------        ------------        ------------        ------------

<S>                                                 <C>                  <C>                <C>                 <C>         
NET (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON
   SHAREHOLDERS................................      $(1,297,548)         $ (960,957)        $(2,733,114)        $(2,062,536)
                                                    ============          ==========         ===========         ===========


Weighted average number of Class A common
   share outstanding...........................        2,734,975           3,926,237           2,734,975           3,286,559

Weighted average number of Class B common
   share outstanding...........................        1,469,050           1,372,566           1,469,050           1,372,566

Less escrow shares.............................         (781,244)           (781,244)           (781,244)           (781,244)
                                                     -----------         -----------         -----------         -----------


WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES
   OUTSTANDING.................................        3,422,781           4,517,559           3,422,781           3,877,881
                                                       =========           =========           =========           =========

NET (LOSS) PER SHARE OF COMMON SHARE...........            $(.38)              $(.21)              $(.80)              $(.53)
                                                          ======              ======              ======              ======
</TABLE>


         The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
                             financial statements.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5187 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to provide 

a uniform 8-digit subheading number for all whiskies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2022 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States to provide a uniform 8-digit subheading number 

for all whiskies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. UNIFORM DUTY TREATMENT OF WHISKIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 22 of the Harmonized 

5 Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by strik6 ing subheading 2208.30 and inserting the following, with 

7 the article description for subheading 2208.30.00 having 

8 the same degree of indentation as the article description 

9 for subheading 2208.50.00: 

‘‘ 2208.30.00 Whiskies .......................................... Free $2.04/pf liter ’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5187 IS

1 (b) INSTRUCTION TO UNITED STATES INTER2 NATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION.—The United States 

3 International Trade Commission shall add statistical suf4 fixes to subheading 2208.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 

5 Schedule of the United States, as amended by subsection 

6 (a), as follows: 

2208.30.0010 ....... Irish or Scotch in containers each holding not over 4 liters 

2208.30.0015 ....... Irish or Scotch in containers each holding over 4 liters 

2208.30.0020 ....... Bourbon in containers each holding not over 4 liters 

2208.30.0025 ....... Bourbon in containers each holding over 4 liters 

2208.30.0030 ....... Rye in containers each holding not over 4 liters 

2208.30.0035 ....... Rye in containers each holding over 4 liters 

2208.30.0040 ....... Other in containers each holding not over 4 liters 

2208.30.0045 ....... Other in containers each holding over 4 liters. 

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall apply with respect to articles entered, 

9 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

10 the date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment 

11 of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TYREE A. LAWSON,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 47 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of May

, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED

, and the “Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or

Extraordinary Relief from Judicial Fraud ” is DENIED

.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5017 

To repeal the corporate alternative minimum tax. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 

Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. BRAUN, 

Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. LANKFORD, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. PORTMAN, 

Mr. RISCH, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. WICKER, and Mr. HOEVEN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the corporate alternative minimum tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repealing the Ill-Con5 ceived and Problematic (RIP) Book Minimum Tax Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CORPORATE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM 

7 TAX. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Sections 10101 and 13904(a) of 

9 Public Law 117–169 are repealed. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5017 IS

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The Internal Revenue Code of 

2 1986 shall be applied and administered as if such sections 

3 (and the amendments made by such sections) had not 

4 been enacted. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-198 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, September 15, 1999)

NRC EXPANDS REGULATIONS

FOR SPENT FUEL STORAGE CASK CERTIFICATES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is expanding the scope of its regulations to make

them more fully applicable to holders of, and applicants for, NRC certificates of compliance for

the design of a spent fuel storage cask.

These changes are necessary to more effectively address performance issues that have

occurred in the spent fuel storage industry in recent years.

The revisions enhance the agency’s ability to take appropriate enforcement action

against these companies if they violate requirements in Part 72 of the Commission’s

regulations. This action will emphasize the safety and regulatory significance associated with

violations of the regulations by allowing NRC to take enforcement action rather than

administrative action when violations of NRC requirements have occurred.

The changes also add recordkeeping and reporting requirements.

Further details of the changes are contained in a Federal Register notice to be

published shortly. The revisions will be effective 60 days after publication of this notice. In

addition, the NRC is publishing a revision to its Enforcement Policy (NUREG-1600, Rev. 1) for

public comment to clarify that enforcement action may be taken against nonlicensees for

violations of 10 CFR Part 72.

###
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 420

**Question 420:** This question refers to the answer to Question 55 in §20.2104.
> 
 (a) Despite the quoted reference, §20.2104 only refers to occupational radiation dose (why radiation when the defined term is occupational dose?), which is defined in terms of "dose." 

(b) The definition of dose does not include eye, shallow, or extremity doses. What is the regulatory basis for including eye, shallow, and extremity doses within the scope of §20.2104 where it is so explicitly not included? A simple discussion in the Statement of Considerations does not seem to be an adequate basis for rewriting a regulation. 

(c) Are the dose histories of these three organs (eye, skin, extremity) so high as to necessitate the paperwork to track these for new employees? I suspect that for the vast majority of workers, these are negligible compared to TEDE.

**Answer:**
> 
(a) "Dose" and "radiation dose" are synonymous (see "Dose or radiation dose" in §20.1003); therefore, "occupational dose" and "occupation radiation dose" are synonymous.

(b) Contrary to the statement in the question, "dose or radiation dose" is broadly defined in Part 20 as "a generic term that means absorbed dose, dose equivalent, effective dose equivalent, committed dose equivalent, committed effective dose equivalent, or total effective dose equivalent, as defined in other paragraphs of . . . [10 CFR 20.1003]." The "eye dose equivalent" and the "shallow dose equivalent" (the quantity used in the limits for the skin and for the extremities) are both "dose equivalent" quantities and, therefore, are "doses" as defined in Part 20. The occupational dose limits include limits for the eye, shallow, and extremity doses and the "occupational dose" in 10 CFR 20.2104 (a) (1) includes the eye, shallow, and extremity doses. The recommendation in the Statement of Considerations (which is not an explicit requirement in the regulation) that, in establishing administrative controls, the licensee should reduce the values for limits other than the TEDE by one quarter of their annual limit for each unreported quarter provides a method, acceptable to the NRC staff, for licensees to demonstrate compliance with those limits when records of those doses are missing for a portion of the year.

(c) A licensee is required to determine a particular occupational dose received by a new employee earlier in the current year only if the licensee makes the prospective determination that individual monitoring will be required, pursuant to 10 CFR 20.1502, for the prospective occupational dose. If the licensee determines that individual monitoring for eye or shallow or extremity dose are not required for a particular individual (because, at the licensee's facility, those doses are not likely to exceed 10 percent of the limits for those doses), the licensee is not required to determine the prior eye or shallow or extremity doses.

(References: 10 CFR 20.2104, 10 CFR 20.1003)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.970 Servicing of 504 loans and Debentures. ( a ) In servicing 504 loans, CDCs must comply with Loan Program Requirements and in accordance with prudent and commercially reasonable lending standards.
( b ) The CDC is responsible for routine servicing including receipt and review of the Borrower's or Operating Company's financial statements on an annual or more frequent basis and monitoring the status of the Borrower and 504 loan collateral.
( c ) The CDC is responsible for assuring that the Borrower makes all required insurance premium payments and has paid all taxes when due.
( d ) The CDC is responsible for filing renewals and extensions of security interests on collateral for the 504 loan, as required.
( e ) The CDC must timely respond to Borrower requests for loan modifications.
( f ) For any 504 loan that is more than three months past due, the CDC must promptly request that SBA purchase the Debenture unless the 504 loan has an SBA-approved deferment or is in compliance with an SBA-approved plan to allow the Borrower to catch up on delinquent loan payments.
( g ) The CDC must cooperate with SBA to cure defaults and initiate workouts.
( h ) Additional servicing requirements are set forth in subpart E of this part.
[68 FR 57988, Oct. 7, 2003, as amended at 72 FR 18364, Apr. 12, 2007]
§ 422.7 Authorization to perform law enforcement duties. ( a ) The CLEO must issue written authorization to each officer who is authorized to perform Reclamation law enforcement duties.
( b ) Before issuing an authorization under paragraph (a) of this section, the CLEO must ensure that the officer meets: ( 1 ) All the requirements for officers authorized under the law enforcement contract or cooperative agreement with Reclamation; and
( 2 ) All requirements in §§ 422.10, 422.11, and 422.12.
( c ) The CLEO must terminate an officer's authorization under paragraph (a) of this section and must notify the issuing Reclamation official when the officer: ( 1 ) Terminates employment as a full-time police officer for any reason;
( 2 ) Is transferred to another area of jurisdiction, where the continued performance of Reclamation duties would be impractical;
( 3 ) Is suspended for any offense that would impair his/her fitness to perform law enforcement duties; or
( 4 ) Is under indictment or has been charged with a crime.
( d ) The LEA can, upon showing just cause, revoke the authorization of an individual officer to perform law enforcement services under Reclamation's law enforcement authority after providing written notice to the CLEO.
§ 113.220 Admissions. ( a ) Admissions to educational institutions prior to June 24, 1973, are not covered by these Title IX regulations.
( b ) *Administratively separate units.* For the purposes only of this section, §§ 113.225 and 113.230, and §§ 113.300 through 113.310, each administratively separate unit shall be deemed to be an educational institution.
( c ) *Application of §§ 113.300 through 113.310 .* Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, §§ 113.300 through 113.310 apply to each recipient. A recipient to which §§ 113.300 through 113.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 113.300 through 113.310.
( d ) *Educational institutions.* Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section as to recipients that are educational institutions, §§ 113.300 through 113.310 apply only to institutions of vocational education, professional education, graduate higher education, and public institutions of undergraduate higher education.
( e ) *Public institutions of undergraduate higher education.* §§ 113.300 through 113.310 do not apply to any public institution of undergraduate higher education that traditionally and continually from its establishment has had a policy of admitting students of only one sex.
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2002 Page 1 of 2
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2002 Page 2 of 2
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# EPA Inspections for Compliance with NPDES Permits Issued to NRC Licensees

## HPPOS-115 PDR-9111210267

See the memorandum from L. B. Higginbotham to G. D. Brown dated April 14, 1976. 

The EPA has authority to make inspections related to a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The EPA can grant States the authority to issue NPDES permits; giving the States similar authority to make inspections.

The EPA, under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Public Law 92-500), is acting within its jurisdiction to conduct periodic inspections to determine the degree of compliance by licensees with NPDES permits.

Representatives of the EPA can observe process operations, inspect monitoring and laboratory equipment and methods, collect samples, examine appropriate records, and be concerned with other related matters. The NPDES permit system was implemented by the EPA under Title 10 "Protection of the Environment," *Code of Federal Regulations*, Chapter I. Section 309 (Federal Enforcement) gives the EPA the authority to levy civil monetary penalties for noncompliance.

The EPA can also grant the States the authority to issue NPDES permits. This gives those States the authority, having issued an NPDES permit to an NRC licensee, to inspect and assure compliance with the permit.

**Regulatory references:**None

**Subject codes:** 12.9, 12.13

**Applicability:** Reactors

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 16, 2017