CostBasisCapital CostTotal Installed Cost $ 2,904,000Fuel Tech budgetary Total Installed Cost for equipment (a).Annual Capacity Factor, % 30%Ravenswood anticipates to operate at a 30% capacityfactor in the near futureBoiler Capacity, MMBtu/hr 4,204MMBtu/hr heat input rating provided by TransCanadaRavenswood GeneratingStationNOx Emissions before Control, lb/MMBtu 0.24Maximum actual emissions pre-LNB/SOFANOx Emissions after Control, lb/MMBtu 0.17Maximum actual emissions post-LNB/SOFANOx Emissions before Control, tons/year 1,325.8Calculated from the pre-control lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hrrating of the unit and the annualcapacity factorNOx Emissions after Control, tons/year 939.1Calculated from the post-control lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hrrating of the unit and the annualcapacity factorNOx Emission Reduction, ton/yr 386.7Annual Costs, $/yrOperating Labor $ 4,9280.5 hr/shift at $30/hr(b)Supervisor $ 73915% of operating labor(b)Maintenance Labor $ 4,9280.5 hr/shift at $30/hr(b)Maintenance Materials $ 4,928100% of maintenance labor(b)Overhead $ 9,31360% of oper, maint. & supv labor + maint. materialcosts(b)Taxes, Insurance, and Administration $ 116,1604% of total installed cost(b)Capital Recovery $ 413,4647.0%, 10 years, 0.1424 TCI(b)Total Annual Cost $ 554,459Cost Effectiveness, $ per ton $1,434 / tonTotal annual cost divided by tons of NOx removedTable A-1LNB/SOFA Cost Effectiveness for NOxfor Ravenswood No. 10 Boiler @ 30 % Capacity Factor(b) EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition, Section 4, Page 2-44. EPA/452/B-002-001. January 2002.(a) Total Installed Cost estimate for the advancedcombustion control system provided by Fuel Tech. Urea solution cost (as delivered) provided by MosaicCompany, Bob Ness (800-918-8270), May 3, 2010.Ravenswood Generating Station BART ReportAppendix APage A-1CostBasisCapital CostTotal Installed Cost $ 2,904,000Fuel Tech budgetary Total Installed Cost for equipment (a).Annual Capacity Factor, % 30%Ravenswood anticipates to operate at a 30% capacityfactor in the near futureBoiler Capacity, MMBtu/hr 4,171MMBtu/hr heat input rating provided by TransCanadaRavenswood GeneratingStationNOx Emissions before Control, lb/MMBtu 0.24Maximum emissions before controlNOx Emissions after Control, lb/MMBtu 0.17Maximum emissions after controlNOx Emissions before Control, tons/year 1,315.4Calculated from the pre-control lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hrrating of the unit and the annualcapacity factorNOx Emissions after Control, tons/year 939.1Calculated from the post-control lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hrrating of the unit and the annualcapacity factorNOx Emission Reduction, ton/yr 376.3Annual Costs, $/yrOperating Labor $ 4,9280.5 hr/shift at $30/hr(b)Supervisor $ 73915% of operating labor(b)Maintenance Labor $ 4,9280.5 hr/shift at $30/hr(b)Maintenance Materials $ 4,928100% of maintenance labor(b)Overhead $ 9,31360% of oper, maint. & supv labor + maint. materialcosts(b)Taxes, Insurance, and Administration $ 116,160.004% of total installed cost(b)Capital Recovery $ 413,4647.0%, 10 years, 0.1424 TCI(b)Total Annual Cost $ 554,459Cost Effectiveness, $ per ton $1,474 / tonTotal annual cost divided by tons of NOx removedTable A-2LNB/SOFA Cost Effectiveness for NOxfor Ravenswood No. 20 Boiler @ 30 % Capacity Factor(b) EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition, Section 4, Page 2-44. EPA/452/B-002-001. January 2002.(a) Total Installed Cost estimate for the advancedcombustion control system provided by Fuel Tech. Urea solution cost (as delivered) provided by MosaicCompany, Bob Ness (800-918-8270), May 3, 2010.Ravenswood Generating Station BART ReportAppendix APage A-2CostBasisCapital CostTotal Installed Cost $ 8,000,000Fuel Tech budgetary Total Installed Cost for equipment (a). Unit 3 consistsof 2 modules A and B each requiring its own combustion control system.Annual Capacity Factor, % 30%Ravenswood anticipates to operate at a 30% capacityfactor in the nearfutureBoiler Capacity, MMBtu/hr 9,379MMBtu/hr heat input rating provided by TransCanadaRavenswoodGenerating StationNOx Emissions before Control, lb/MMBtu 0.24Maximum actual emissions pre-LNB/SOFANOx Emissions after Control, lb/MMBtu 0.17Maximum actual emissions post-LNB/SOFANOx Emissions before Control, tons/year 2,957.8Calculated from the pre-control lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hrrating of the unit and theannual capacity factorNOx Emissions after Control, tons/year 2,095.1Calculated from the post-control lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hrrating of the unit andthe annual capacity factorNOx Emission Reduction, ton/yr 862.7Annual Costs, $/yrOperating Labor $ 9,8550.5 hr/shift at $30/hr(b)Supervisor $ 2,95715% of operating labor(b)Maintenance Labor $ 9,8550.5 hr/shift at $30/hr(b)Maintenance Materials $ 9,855100% of maintenance labor(b)Overhead $ 19,51360% of oper, maint. & supv labor + maint. materialcosts(b)Taxes, Insurance, and Administration $320,0004% of total installed cost(b)Capital Recovery $ 1,139,0207.0%, 10 years, 0.1424 TCI(b)Total Annual Cost $ 1,511,054Cost Effectiveness, $ per ton $1,752 / tonTotal annual cost divided by tons of NOx removedTable A-3LNB/SOFA Cost Effectiveness for NOxfor Ravenswood No. 30 Boilers @ 30 % Capacity Factor(b) EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition, Section 4, Page 2-44. EPA/452/B-002-001. January 2002.(a) Total Installed Cost estimate for the advancedcombustion control system provided by Fuel Tech. Urea solution cost (as delivered) provided by MosaicCompany, Bob Ness (800-918-8270), May 3, 2010.Ravenswood Generating Station BART ReportAppendix APage A-3CostBasisCapital CostTotal Installed Cost $ 2,359,500Fuel Tech budgetary Total Installed Cost for equipment (a).Annual Capacity Factor, % 30%Ravenswood anticipates to operate at a 30% capacityfactor in the near futureBoiler Capacity, MMBtu/hr 4,204Rated MMBtu/hr heat input provided by TransCanada Ravenswood Generating StationNOx Emissions before Control, lb/MMBtu 0.170Maximum actual emissions pre-SNCRNOx Emissions after Control, lb/MMBtu 0.150Maximum actual emissions post-SNCRNOx Emissions before Control, tons/year 939.1Calculated from the pre-control lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hrrating of the unit and the annual capacity factorNOx Emissions after Control, tons/year 828.6Calculated from the post-control lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hrrating of the unit and the annual capacity factorNOx Emission Reduction, ton/yr 110.5Annual Costs, $/yrUrea solution $ 251,789Estimate from Fuel Tech, 67 gal/hr. $1.43/gal delivered cost based on quotation from Mosaic Co. (a)Water$ 2,838Engineering judgment, 45 gal/min. $0.4/1,000 gal.(Range of 30 - 60 gpm given by Fuel tech)Operating Labor $ 4,9280.5 hr/shift at $30/hr(b)Supervisor $ 73915% of operating labor(b)Maintenance Labor $ 4,9280.5 hr/shift at $30/hr(b)Maintenance Materials $ 4,928100% of maintenance labor(b)Air Heater Washes (est. 3-6/year per unit) $240,000Conservatively 3 washes/year @ $80,000/washAmmonia CEMS Labor $ 10,000AECOM experienceElectricity $ 17,345Engineering judgment, 110 kW/hr @ $0.06/kWh. (range of 100 - 120 kW estimated by Fuel Tech)Overhead $ 159,31360% of oper, maint. & supv labor + maint. materialcosts(b)Taxes, Insurance, and Administration $94,3804% of total installed cost(b)Capital Recovery $ 335,9407.0%, 10 years, 0.1424 TCI(b)Total Annual Cost $ 1,127,126Cost Effectiveness, $ per ton $10,202 / tonTotal annual cost divided by tons of NOx removedTable A-4SNCR Cost Effectiveness for NOxfor Ravenswood No. 10 Boiler @ 30 % Capacity Factor(b) EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition, Section 4, Page 2-44. EPA/452/B-002-001. January 2002.(a) Total Installed Cost estimate for SNCR providedby Fuel Tech. Urea solution cost (as delivered) provided by Mosaic Company, Bob Ness (800-918-8270), May 3, 2010.Ravenswood Generating Station BART ReportAppendix APage A-4CostBasisCapital CostTotal Installed Cost $ 2,359,500Fuel Tech budgetary Total Installed Cost for equipment (a).Annual Capacity Factor, % 30%Ravenswood anticipates to operate at a 30% capacityfactor in the near futureBoiler Capacity, MMBtu/hr 4,171Rated MMBtu/hr heat input provided by TransCanada Ravenswood Generating StationNOx Emissions before Control, lb/MMBtu 0.170Maximum emissions pre-SNCRNOx Emissions after Control, lb/MMBtu 0.150Maximum emissions post-SNCRNOx Emissions before Control, tons/year 931.7Calculated from the pre-control lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hrrating of the unit and the annual capacity factorNOx Emissions after Control, tons/year 822.1Calculated from the post-control lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hrrating of the unit and the annual capacity factorNOx Emission Reduction, ton/yr 109.6Annual Costs, $/yrUrea solution $ 251,789Estimate from Fuel Tech, 67 gal/hr. $1.43/gal delivered cost based on quotation from Mosaic Co. (a)Water$ 2,838Engineering judgment, 45 gal/min. $0.4/1,000 gal.(Range of 30 - 60 gpm given by Fuel tech)Operating Labor $ 4,9280.5 hr/shift at $30/hr(b)Supervisor $ 73915% of operating labor(b)Maintenance Labor $ 4,9280.5 hr/shift at $30/hr(b)Maintenance Materials $ 4,928100% of maintenance labor(b)Air Heater Washes (est. 3-6/year per unit) $240,000Conservatively 3 washes/year @ $80,000/washAmmonia CEMS Labor $ 10,000AECOM experienceElectricity $ 17,345Engineering judgment, 110 kW/hr @ $0.06/kWh. (range of 100 - 120 kW estimated by Fuel Tech)Overhead $ 159,31360% of oper, maint. & supv labor + maint. materialcosts(b)Taxes, Insurance, and Administration $94,3804% of total installed cost(b)Capital Recovery $ 335,9407.0%, 10 years, 0.1424 TCI(b)Total Annual Cost $ 1,127,126Cost Effectiveness, $ per ton $10,283 / tonTotal annual cost divided by tons of NOx removedTable A-5SNCR Cost Effectiveness for NOxfor Ravenswood No. 20 Boiler @ 30 % Capacity Factor(b) EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition, Section 4, Page 2-44. EPA/452/B-002-001. January 2002.(a) Total Installed Cost estimate for SNCR providedby Fuel Tech. Urea solution cost (as delivered) provided by Mosaic Company, Bob Ness (800-918-8270), May 3, 2010.Ravenswood Generating Station BART ReportAppendix APage A-5CostBasisCapital CostTotal Installed Cost $ 6,000,000Fuel Tech budgetary Total Installed Cost for equipment (a). Unit 3 consistsof 2 modules A and B each requiring its own SNCR.Annual Capacity Factor, % 30%Ravenswood anticipates to operate at a 30% capacityfactor in the nearfutureBoiler Capacity, MMBtu/hr 9,379Rated MMBtu/hr heat input provided by TransCanada RavenswoodGenerating StationNOx Emissions before Control, lb/MMBtu 0.170Maximum emissions pre-SNCRNOx Emissions after Control, lb/MMBtu 0.150Maximum emissions post-SNCRNOx Emissions before Control, tons/year 2,095.1Calculated from the pre-control lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hrrating of the unit and theannual capacity factorNOx Emissions after Control, tons/year 1,848.6Calculated from the post-control lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hrrating of the unit andthe annual capacity factorNOx Emission Reduction, ton/yr 246.5Annual Costs, $/yrUrea solution $ 664,421Estimate from Fuel Tech, 88.4gal/hr/SNCR. $1.43/gal delivered cost basedon quotation from Mosaic Co. (a)Water$ 5,676Engineering judgment, 45 gal/min. $0.4/1,000 gal.(Range of 30 - 60 gpmgiven by Fuel tech)Operating Labor $ 9,8550.5 hr/shift at $30/hr(b)Supervisor $ 2,95715% of operating labor(b)Maintenance Labor $ 9,8550.5 hr/shift at $30/hr(b)Maintenance Materials $ 9,855100% of maintenance labor(b)Air Heater Washes (est. 3-6/year per unit) $600,000Conservatively 3 washes/year /SNCR@ $100,000/wash/SNCRAmmonia CEMS Labor $ 20,000AECOM experienceElectricity $ 34,690Engineering judgment, 110 kW/hr/SNCR @ $0.06/kWh.(range of 100 - 120kW estimated by Fuel Tech)Overhead $ 391,51360% of oper, maint. & supv labor + maint. materialcosts(b)Taxes, Insurance, and Administration $240,0004% of total installed cost(b)Capital Recovery $ 854,2657.0%, 10 years, 0.1424 TCI(b)Total Annual Cost $ 2,843,087Cost Effectiveness, $ per ton $11,535 / tonTotal annual cost divided by tons of NOx removedTable A-6SNCR Cost Effectiveness for NOxfor Ravenswood No. 30 Boilers @ 30 % Capacity Factor(b) EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition, Section 4, Page 2-44. EPA/452/B-002-001. January 2002.(a) Total Installed Cost estimate for SNCR providedby Fuel Tech. Urea solution cost (as delivered) provided by Mosaic Company, Bob Ness (800-918-8270),May 3, 2010.Ravenswood Generating Station BART ReportAppendix APage A-6Boiler 10 Boiler 20 NotesCapital CostTotal Installed Cost $ 100,000,000 $ 100,000,000 Costs provided by TransCanadaBoiler Capacity, MMBtu/hr 4,204 4,171MMBtu/hr heat input rating provided byTransCanada Ravenswood GeneratingStationNOx Emissions before Control, lb/MMBtu 0.17 0.17Emission rate post the advancedcombustion controlsAnnual Capacity Factor, % 30% 30%Ravenswood anticipates to operate at a30% capacity factor in the near futureNOx Emissions before Control, ton/yr 939.1 931.7NOx Emissions after Control, lb/MMBtu 0.03 0.03Control Efficiency, %85% 85%NOx Emissions after Control, ton/yr 138.1 137.0NOx Emission Reduction, ton/yr 801.0 794.7Annual Costs, $/yrCatalyst Annual CostCatalyst Replacement Cost $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 10% of SCR's total installaed costCatalyst Life 5.05.0 yearsAnnual Costs, $/yr $ 2,438,907 $ 2,438,9077% interest(a)19% aqueous ammonia $ 187,431 $185,9600.39 ton NH3 per ton NOx removed at adelivered cost of $600/ton NH3 based on19% aqueous ammonia (engineeringestimate).Operating Labor $ 25,550 $ 25,550 2.0 hr/day at $35/hrSupervisor $ 3,833 $ 3,833 15% of operating laborMaintenance Labor $ 25,550 $25,550 2.0 hr/day at $35/hrMaintenance Materials $ 25,550 $25,550 100% of maintenance laborAmmonia CEMS labor $ 20,000 $20,000 AECOM experienceElectricity $ 105,120 $ 105,120Engineering estimate. 500 kW for BoilerNo. 10 and Boiler No. 20. $0.08/kWhOverhead $ 60,290 $ 60,29060% of oper, maint. & supv labor + maint.material costs(a)Taxes, Insurance, and Administration $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,0004% of total installed cost(a)Capital Recovery $ 12,813,975 $ 12,813,9757.0%, 10 years, 0.1424 x (TCI-catalyst)(a)Total Annual Cost $ 19,706,205 $ 19,704,734Total Cost Effectiveness, $/ton $ 24,602$ 24,795(a) EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition, Section 4, Page 2-44. EPA/452/B-002-001. January 2002.Table A-7SCR Cost Effectiveness for NOxfor Ravenswood No. 10 and 20 Boilers @ 30 % Capacity FactorRavenswood Generating Station BART ReportAppendix APage A-7Boiler 30 NotesCapital CostTotal Installed Cost $ 245,000,000 Costs provided by TransCanadaBoiler Capacity, MMBtu/hr 9,379 Combined capacity ofthe N and S boilersNOx Emissions before Control, lb/MMBtu 0.17Emission rate post the advanced combustioncontrolsAnnual Capacity Factor, % 30%Ravenswood anticipates to operate at a 30%capacity factor in the near futureNOx Emissions before Control, ton/yr 2,095.1NOx Emissions after Control, lb/MMBtu 0.025 engineering judgementControl Efficiency, %85%NOx Emissions after Control, ton/yr 308.1NOx Emission Reduction, ton/yr 1,787.0Annual Costs, $/yrCatalyst Annual CostCatalyst Replacement Cost $ 24,500,000 10% of SCR's total installaed costCatalyst Life 5.0 yearsAnnual Costs, $/yr $ 5,975,3227% interest(a)19% aqueous ammonia $ 418,1540.39 ton NH3 per ton NOx removed at adelivered cost of $600/ton NH3 based on19% aqueous ammonia (engineeringestimate).Operating Labor $ 25,550 2.0 hr/day at $35/hrSupervisor $ 3,833 15% of operating laborMaintenance Labor $ 25,550 2.0 hr/day at$35/hrMaintenance Materials $ 25,550 100% of maintenance laborAmmonia CEMS labor $ 20,000 AECOM experienceElectricity$ 210,240Engineering estimate. 1000 kW for Boiler No,30. $0.08/kWhOverhead$ 60,29060% of oper, maint. & supv labor + maint.material costs(a)Taxes, Insurance, and Administration $ 9,800,0004% of total installed cost(a)Capital Recovery $ 31,394,2397.0%, 10 years, 0.1424 x (TCI-catalyst)(a)Total Annual Cost $ 47,958,727Total Cost Effectiveness, $/ton $ 26,838Table A-8SCR Cost Effectiveness for NOxfor Ravenswood No. 30 Boilers @ 30 % CapacityFactor(a) EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition, Section 4, Page 2-44. EPA/452/B-002-001. January2002.Ravenswood Generating Station BART ReportAppendix APage A-8CostBasisAnnual Capacity Factor, % 30%Ravenswood anticipates to operate at a 30% capacityfactor in the near futureCombined Capacity of the three boilers,MMBtu/hr17,754Combined rated MMBtu/hr heat input for the three boilers provided by TransCanada RavenswoodGenerating StationNOx Emissions (residual oil combustion),lb/MMBtu0.24Maximum actual emissionsNOx Emissions (distillate oil combustion),lb/MMBtu0.10Engineering judgement based on the use of low NOx burnersNOx Emissions (residual oil combustion),tons/year5,598.9Calculated from the residual oil combustion lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hr rating of the unit and annualcapacity factorNOx Emissions (distillate oil combustion),tons/year2,332.9Calculated from the distillate oil combustion lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hr rating of the unit and annualcapacity factorNOx Emission Reduction, ton/yr 3,266.0PM10 Emissions (residual oil combustion),lb/MMBtu0.040PM10 emission factor for residual oil combustion based on AP-42 Table 1.3-1PM10 Emissions (distillate oil combustion),lb/MMBtu0.014PM10 emission factor for distillate oil combustionbased on AP-42 Table 1.3-1PM10 Emissions (residual oil combustion),tons/year929.6Calculated from the residual oil combustion lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hr rating of the unit and annualcapacity factorPM10 Emissions (distillate oil combustion),tons/year333.3Calculated from the distillate oil combustion lb/MMBtu, MMBtu/hr rating of the unit and annualcapacity factorPM10 Emission Reduction, ton/yr 596.3Annual Costs, $/yrIncremental cost of distillate oil over residualoil (10 year average), $/MMBtu$2.24 / MMBtuAnnual Energy Outlook 2010, Report No. DOE/EIA-03832010, Reference Case,http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/index.htmlIncremental cost of distillate oil over residualoil (10 year average), $/year$ 104,338,496Total Annual Cost $ 104,338,496NOx Cost Effectiveness, $ per ton $31,947 / tonTotal annual cost divided by tons of NOx controlledPM Cost Effectiveness, $ per ton $174,975 / tonTotal annual cost divided by tons of PM10 controlledTable A-9Distillate Fuel Oil Cost Effectiveness for PM and NOxfor Ravenswood No. 10, No. 20 and No. 30 Boilers @30% Capacity FactorRavenswood Generating Station BART ReportAppendix APage A-9Unit IDModeledStack ExitVelocity(m/sec)StackDiameter(m)ExhaustTemperature(°F)Modeled StackExit Flow(Actual m3/min)Modeled StackExit Flow(standardft3/min)AnnualizedCost of DryESP(1)($/scfm)Annualized Costof Dry ESP ($)Unit 1048.24.0526037,295965,873$30$28,976,000Unit 2048.24.1126038,425995,141$30$29,854,000Unit 3034.1 7.16 27082,5352,108,023$30$63,241,000$122,071,000Annual capacity factor30%Unit IDPM emissionfactor beforecontrol(lb/1000 gal)UnitCapacity(MMBtu/hr)PM beforecontrol (tpy)% Control offeredby Dry ESPPM after control(tpy)PM controlled(tpy)CostEffectiveness($/ton)Unit 105.977 4,204 220.199%2.20217.9$133,000/tonUnit 205.977 4,171 218.499%2.18216.2$138,100/tonUnit 305.977 9,379 491.199%4.91486.2$130,100/tonTable A-10Dry ESP Cost Effectiveness for PM for Ravenswood No. 10, No. 20 and No. 30 Boilers @ 30 % CapacityFactorTotal Cost for the three units(1) EPA's Air Pollution Control Technology Fact Sheet (EPA-452/F-03-028). Range of $4-$38/scfm given in 2002 $. Average = $22(2002$). Converted to 2010 $ by applying a factor of 558/395.6 (Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Indexratio for 2010/2002).Ravenswood Generating Station BART ReportAppendix APage A-10Unit IDModeledStack ExitVelocity(m/sec)StackDiameter(m)ExhaustTemperature(°F)Modeled StackExit Flow(Actual m3/min)Modeled StackExit Flow(standardft3/min)AnnualizedCost of WetESP(1)($/scfm)Annualized Costof Wet ESP ($)Unit 1048.24.0526037,295965,873$41$39,601,000Unit 2048.24.1126038,425995,141$41$40,801,000Unit 3034.1 7.16 27082,5352,108,023$41$86,429,000$166,831,000Annual capacity factor30%Unit IDPM emissionfactor beforecontrol(lb/1000 gal)UnitCapacity(MMBtu/hr)PM beforecontrol (tpy)% Controloffered by DryESPPM after control(tpy)PM controlled(tpy)CostEffectiveness($/ton)Unit 105.977 4,204220.199.0%2.20217.91$181,700/tonUnit 205.977 4,171218.499.0%2.18216.20$188,700/tonUnit 305.977 9,379 491.199.0%4.91486.16$177,800/tonTable A-11Wet ESP Cost Effectiveness for PM for Ravenswood No. 10, No. 20 and No. 30 Boilers @ 30 % CapacityFactorTotal Cost for the three units(1) EPA's Air Pollution Control Technology Fact Sheet (EPA-452/F-03-029). Range of $12-$46/scfm givenin 2002 $. Average = $29(2002$). Converted to 2010 $ by applying a factor of 558/395.6 (Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Indexratio for 2010/2002).Ravenswood Generating Station BART ReportAppendix APage A-11