alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Roy Steve DAVIS, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-7898.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 10, 2006.

Decided: March 6, 2006.

See also 162 F.3d 1156.

Roy Steve Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Owen Matthew Kendler, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Vacated by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Roy Steve Davis mailed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. While Davis directed his motion to this court, the district court improperly docketed the motion as one in that court under § 2255. The district court then entered an order construing the motion as one seeking authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion and denied it. Davis timely appealed.

Under § 2244, a motion seeking authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion “shall be determined by a three-judge panel of the court of appeals.” § 2244(b)(3)(B). Because Davis clearly sought authorization from this court under § 2244, the district court lacked jurisdiction to act on it. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order. By separate order entered this day, we direct that Davis’ § 2244 motion be filed and docketed in this court. We will then review and act on the motion in due course.

Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order. We deny Davis’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in *801the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

BRADLEY ADAM WINNICK

,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2723 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 69 DB 2020

Attorney Registration No. 78413

( Dauphin County )

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24 th day of February, 2021

, u pon consideration of the

Recommendation of the Three

- Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint Petition

in Support of Discipline on Consent is granted, and Bradley Adam Winnick is suspended

on cons ent from the Bar of this C ommonwealth for a period of one year and one day

,

retroactive to May 22, 2020 . Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E.

217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      29,328,842
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  700,378
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,473,119
<PP&E>                                       6,570,395
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,564,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,131,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,521,040
<BONDS>                                      1,754,525
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       154,491
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,682,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,837,464
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               726,699
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,768,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,641,289)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,641,289)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,641,289)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.72)


</TABLE>
### §6342. Application of proceeds of levy

#### (a) Collection of liability

Any money realized by proceedings under this subchapter (whether by seizure, by surrender under section 6332 (except pursuant to subsection (d)(2) thereof), or by sale of seized property) or by sale of property redeemed by the United States (if the interest of the United States in such property was a lien arising under the provisions of this title) shall be applied as follows:

#### (1) Expense of levy and sale

First, against the expenses of the proceedings;

#### (2) Specific tax liability on seized property

If the property seized and sold is subject to a tax imposed by any internal revenue law which has not been paid, the amount remaining after applying paragraph (1) shall then be applied against such tax liability (and, if such tax was not previously assessed, it shall then be assessed);

#### (3) Liability of delinquent taxpayer

The amount, if any, remaining after applying paragraphs (1) and (2) shall then be applied against the liability in respect of which the levy was made or the sale was conducted.

#### (b) Surplus proceeds

Any surplus proceeds remaining after the application of subsection (a) shall, upon application and satisfactory proof in support thereof, be credited or refunded by the Secretary to the person or persons legally entitled thereto.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 789; Pub. L. 89–719, title I, §104(h), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1137; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 115–141, div. U, title IV, §401(a)(284), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1198.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–141 substituted "subsection (d)(2)" for "subsection (c)(2)" in introductory provisions.

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.

1966—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 89–719 inserted in introductory provisions, references to an exception in the case of surrender under section 6332(c)(2) and to sale of property redeemed by the United States if the interest of the United States in such property was a lien arising under the provisions of this title, struck out "under this subchapter" after "proceedings" in par. (1), and inserted "or the sale was conducted" after "levy was made" in par. (3).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1966 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 89–719 applicable after Nov. 2, 1966, regardless of when title or lien of United States arose or when lien or interest of another person was acquired, with certain exceptions, see section 114(a)–(c) of Pub. L. 89–719, set out as a note under section 6323 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Vagliano, Appellant.

Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster and Bergan, JJ., concur; Deyo, J., dissents. [See *post,*p. 869.]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2004N-0103]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The   Food  and  Drug  Administration  (FDA)  is announcing that a collection of information  entitled  “Guidance  for Industry  on  Special  Protocol  Assessment” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)  under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Nelson, Office of Management Programs  (HFA-250),  Food  and Drug   Administration,   5600   Fishers   Lane,   Rockville,   MD    20857, 301-827-1482.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of July 9, 2004 (69 FR 41502), the agency   announced  that  the  proposed  information  collection  had  been submitted  to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct  or  sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information  unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved  the  information  collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0470.  The approval  expires on September 30, 2007.   A copy of the supporting statement for this information  collection is  available on the Internet at                     *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets*.                

Dated: October 4, 2004.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-22762 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
No: 24-014 February 23, 2024 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC’s Cayetano Santos Honored as a 2024 Federal Engineer of the Year

Cayetano “Tanny” Santos, a senior project manager at the 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, has been honored by the National 

Society of Professional Engineers as one of the top 26 engineers in the 

federal government. Santos received the honor today during the 

NSPE’s 45th annual ceremony. 

Santos, who has worked at the agency for 28 years, was most 

recently a key member of an NRC team providing oversight of 

construction and startup operation of the new Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in 

Georgia. 

“Tanny led all licensing activities for the first two commercial 

nuclear power plants to be built and operated in the United States in 

over 30 years,” said Andrea Veil, director of NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “His 

experience and expertise enabled the successful first use of the one-step licensing process, one of 

the NRC’s top strategic priorities and a project of national importance.” 

The NSPE, which serves more than 26,000 licensed professional engineers of all 

disciplines, promotes the ethical and competent practice of engineering. Federal agencies 

employing at least 50 engineers may nominate candidates for the Federal Engineer of the Year 

award. Top candidates are honored each year, and the society names a single winner at the 

ceremony. 

Santos earned a bachelor’s degree in materials science and engineering from the 

University of Florida and a master’s degree in materials science from the University of 

California at Santa Barbara.
EXHIBIT 99.1



                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Annual Report of Amanasu Environment Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year-ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Atsushi
Maki,  Chairman,  President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.   I  have  reviewed  the  Report;

     2.   based  on  my  knowledge,  the  Report  does  not  contain  any untrue
          statement  of  a  material  fact  or  omit  to  state  a material fact
          necessary  to  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under  which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the  period  covered  by  the  Report;  and

     3.   based  on  my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
          information  included  in  the  Report, fairly present in all material
          respects  the  financial  condition,  results  of operations, and cash
          flows  of  the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the
          Report.

/s/  Atsushi  Maki
------------------
Atsushi  Maki,  Chairman,  President
and  Chief  Financial  Officer
(Principal  Executive  Officer)
(Principal  Financial  Officer)
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Chancellor Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
      H. Grantham, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
      operations of the Company.




/s/
                Thomas H. GranthamThomas
                H. Grantham
              President
                and Chief Financial OfficerDATE:
                November 15, 2007
§ 3622.3 Designation of areas. ( a ) All public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management and the Bureau of Reclamation are open to or available for free use removal of petrified wood unless otherwise provided for by notice in the Federal Register. Free use areas under the jurisdiction of said Bureaus may be modified or cancelled by notices published in the Federal Register.
( b ) The heads of other Bureaus in the Department of the Interior may publish in the Federal Register designations, modifications or cancellations of free use areas for petrified wood on lands under their jurisdiction.
( c ) The Secretary of the Interior may designate, modify or cancel free use areas for petrified wood on public lands which are under the jurisdiction of other Federal departments or agencies, other than the Department of Agriculture, with the consent of the head of other Federal departments or agencies concerned, upon publication of notice in the Federal Register.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Presidio Trust

# AGENCY:

The Presidio Trust. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with § (c)(6) of the Presidio Trust Act, 16 U.S.C. 460bb note, Title I of Pub. L. 104-333, 110 Stat. 4097, as amended, and in accordance with the Presidio Trust's bylaws, notice is hereby given that a public meeting of the Presidio Trust Board of Directors will be held commencing 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, November 4, 2004, at the Officers' Club, 50 Moraga Avenue, Presidio of San Francisco, California. The Presidio Trust was created by Congress in 1996 to manage approximately eighty percent of the former U.S. Army base known as the Presidio, in San Francisco, California. 

The purposes of this meeting are to provide the Executive Director's report and to receive public comment regarding the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Public Health Service Hospital project. 

*Accommodation:*                         Individuals requiring special accommodation at this meeting, such as needing a sign language interpreter, should contact Mollie Matull at (415) 561-5300 prior to October 25, 2004.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Cook, General Counsel, the Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, PO Box 29052, San Francisco, California 94129-0052, Telephone: (415) 561-5300. 

Dated: October 1, 2004. 

Karen A. Cook, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 04-22560 Filed 10-6-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-CV-61208-RKA

SIMPLIFIED IMAGING & DIAGNOSTICS,

SIMPLIFIED IMAGING SOLUTIONS LLC

d/b/a IMAGING SOLUTIONS (SIS),

Plaintiff,

vs.

PETER ROUVELAS, M.D., P.C.,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

This Matter, having come before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time

to File Response to Complaint (Doc. 1), and it appearing, that the Motion is uncontested and

should be granted for good cause shown, it is hereby:

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Defendant's Motion for Extension

of Time to File Response to Complaint (Doc. 1) is granted and the Plaintiff shall have until August

10, 2020 to file any such response to the Complaint.

ENTERED this _____ day of July, 2020. 

_______________________________

Hon. Roy K. Altman

United States District Judge

COPIES TO:

Peter J. Solnick

Solnick Law P.A.

17501 Biscayne Boulevard

Suite 420

Case 0:20-cv-61208-RKA Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2020 Page 1 of 2
Aventura, FL 33160

George F. Indest , III

Lance O. Leider

Carole C. Schriefer

The Health Law Firm

1101 Douglas Avenue

Suite 1000

Altamonte Springs, FL 32714

- 2 -

Case 0:20-cv-61208-RKA Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2020 Page 2 of 2
### **CHAPTER 23—WORKER ADJUSTMENT AND RETRAINING NOTIFICATION**

Sec.
2101.
Definitions; exclusions from definition of loss of employment.
2102.
Notice required before plant closings and mass layoffs.
2103.
Exemptions.
2104.
Administration and enforcement of requirements.
2105.
Procedures in addition to other rights of employees.
2106.
Procedures encouraged where not required.
2107.
Authority to prescribe regulations.
2108.
Effect on other laws.
2109.
Report on employment and international competitiveness.
(No. 990

Claimant awarded $797.97.)

#### Saint Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 19, 1927.*

Privilege *tax*— when *refund may he made. Overpayment.*Where a privilege tax has been assessed and paid, and credit therefor was not given by the department, and the tax is again paid for the same year, claimant is entitled to a refund of the overpayment.

C. J. Doyle, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Frank B. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim filed by the St. Paul Fire *&*Marine Insurance Company for a refund of $797.97 privilege tax overpaid to the Division of Insurance of the Department of Trade and Commerce of the State of Illinois in the year 1925. This *261amount was paid by claimant to the city collector of the city of Chicago, and, under the provisions of the statute, should have been credited on the amount of its assessment for the year 1924, payable in 1925, but by oversight the credit was not given.

The Attorney General has filed a statement on behalf of the State to-which is attached as an exhibit a letter of the Supérintendent of Insurance which admits that claimant should have had a credit of $797.97 on its privilege tax for that year, and advises that the claim be allowed.

The Attorney General accordingly consents that an award be allowed cláimant in the sum of $797.97. It is manifest that claimant has paid a double tax to the extent of the claim filed and we therefore allow it an award of $797.97.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 20-cv-22840-UU

CARLOS BRITO,

Plaintiff,

v.

SOUTHLAND MALL PROPERTIES, 

LLC; SOUTHLAND ITALIAN, LLC; T4 

MANAGEMENT, LLC; and DOHERTY 

APPLE FLORIDA, LLC,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Plaintiff and Defendant Doherty Apple Florida, 

LLC’s Joint Notice of Settlement (“Notice”). D.E. 31. The Court has reviewed the pertinent 

portions of the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. Accordingly, as all other 

Defendants have been dismissed from this case, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Clerk of Court SHALL administratively close this 

case. All future hearings are CANCELED and all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

THE PARTIES are hereby notified that all papers related to the settlement reached by the 

parties, including any order of dismissal stating specific terms and conditions, must be received by 

this Court by February 4, 2021. If such papers are not filed by this deadline, this matter will be 

DISMISSED without further notice. Within sixty (60) days of such an order of dismissal, either 

party may petition the court to have the case reinstated after showing good cause as to why 

settlement was not in fact consummated. 

Case 1:20-cv-22840-UU Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/08/2021 Page 1 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this _8th_ day of January 2021.

_______________________________ 

URSULA UNGARO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Counsel of Record via CM/ECF

Case 1:20-cv-22840-UU Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/08/2021 Page 2 of 2