alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  | Division of Migratory Bird ManagementReports         2002 |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------|

| **Migratory         Bird Population Status**        Status and Harvests of Sandhill Cranes 2002, Mid-Continent & Rocky         Mountain Populations, Acrobat PDF

Waterfowl         Population Status, 2002, Acrobat PDFAmerican         Woodcock Population Status, 2002, Acrobat PDF

Trends         in Duck Breeding Populations, 1955-2002, Acrobat PDF

Mourning         Dove Breeding Population Status 2002, Acrobat PDF**Waterfowl         Breeding Population Surveys, May 2002**Central         and Northern Quebec, Acrobat PDFMaine         & The Maritimes, Acrobat PDF

Montana,         Acrobat PDFNew York, Eastern Ontario, and Southern Quebec,         Acrobat PDF 

Northern         Alberta, Northeastern British Columbia and The Northwest Territories,         Acrobat PDF 

**Waterfowl         Breeding Population Surveys, May 2002 (cont.)**Northern         Manitoba and Northern Saskatchewan, Acrobat PDF

Southern         Manitoba and Saskatchewan River Delta, Acrobat PDF

Southern         Saskatchewan, Acrobat PDF

Southern         and Central Alberta, Acrobat PDF

Western         and Central Ontario, Acrobat PDF

Western         James Bay Lowlands, Experimental Stratum 57, Acrobat PDF

**Waterfowl         Production Surveys, July 2002**South         Dakota and North Dakota, Acrobat PDF****

Southern         and Central Alberta, Acrobat PDF

Southern         Saskatchewan, Acrobat PDF
Return         toHome         Page or Reports |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-96-71 December 2, 1996

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

SPECIAL NRC TEAM INSPECTION BEGINNING

AT POINT BEACH NUCLEAR POWER STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is conducting a special

two-week team inspection to evaluate operational safety at the

Point Beach Nuclear Power Station. The plant, operated by

Wisconsin Electric Power Co., is at Two Creeks, Wisconsin.

The inspection begins today (December 2), and will conclude

Friday, December 13. The team will present its preliminary

findings in a meeting with utility officials on Friday, December

20.

That meeting will be at 10 a.m. in the Two Creeks Town Hall,

located at State Highway 42 and Tapawingo Road north of Two

Rivers, Wisconsin. The meeting will be open to public

observation.

The inspection was scheduled to provide a broad review of

plant activities following problems earlier this year with

control room operations and with the equipment testing program.

These issues were the subject of a predecisional enforcement

conference between the NRC staff and the utility in September. A

decision on the enforcement action is still pending.

The team inspection will include around-the-clock

surveillance of routine activities in the plant's control room

for several days. Inspectors will also review maintenance,

testing, and engineering activities.

The 10-person team is headed by Melvyn Leach, Chief of the

NRC's Region III Operator Licensing Branch. Steven Ray, Senior

Resident Inspector at the Prairie Island Nuclear Power Station in

Minnesota, is the assistant team leader.

Other team members include engineering and reactor

operations specialists from the Region III office in Lisle,

Illinois; another senior resident inspector and a resident

inspector from other sites; and a human factors specialist from

NRC Headquarters in Rockville, Maryland.

#####
Exhibit 99.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection  with this annual  report on Form 10-KSB of United  Tennessee
Bankshares, Inc. I, Richard G. Harwood, President and Chief Executive Officer of
United  Tennessee  Bankshares,  Inc.,  certify,  pursuant  to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in this report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of United Tennessee Bankshares, Inc.



Date: March 28, 2003                             /s/ Richard G. Harwood
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Richard G. Harwood
                                                 President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
6/29/22, 5:04 PM John Vlieger

file:///C:/Users/jacobyc/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/Content.Outlook/YW1PVDAG/John Vlieger.html 7/8

Generated by Chuck Bradley on Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 5:10 PM UTC-04:00

Contains data from September 1, 2019 at 12:00 AM to June 9, 2022 at 11:59 PM

Jan 30, 2020 3:37:19pm

John Vlieger

you think Bedell built this? allegedly it was one that we got in here at the beginning.

Jan 30, 2020 3:36:10pm

John Vlieger

Jan 30, 2020 3:35:13pm

John Vlieger

enlightening, yes. surprising, no

Jan 10, 2020 3:32:31pm

Chuck Bradley

Wasn’t sure , thought you might want to see it

Jan 10, 2020 3:31:35pm

John Vlieger

Dame already shared that with me

Jan 10, 2020 3:21:12pm

Chuck Bradley

https://www.movingscam.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7726

https://www.movingscam.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7726

Jan 10, 2020 3:18:45pm

Chuck Bradley

Jan 10, 2020 3:18:39pm

Chuck Home

SCI 001800 CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-147 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 226

**Question 226:**
> 
(a) Under 10 CFR 20.1904, what is a container?

(b) How big can a container be?

(c) Can a room be considered a container?

(d) Is a transportation cask a container when it is not being transported?

(e) Are vehicles (e.g., trailer of a tractor-trailer) containers?

**Answer:**
> 
(a) In the context of 10 CFR 20.1904, and in accordance with Health Physics Position (HPPOS) 28, a container is a receptacle in which radioactive material is held or carried.

(b) There is no limit to the size of a container.

(c) Typically, a room is not considered a container; it is considered an area, and should be posted as such.

(d) A transportation cask or package in certain circumstances could be a container. If a container is in transport and packaged and labeled in accordance with Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations, it is exempt from the labelling requirements of 10 CFR 20.1904. If, however, the container / cask / package is not in transport, it is subject to the labelling requirements of 10 CFR 20.1904.

(e) Under certain circumstances, the trailer of a tractor-trailer could be considered a container.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1904, HPPOS 28)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 24, 2017
#### § 3601.70 Unauthorized use.
Editorial Note on Part 115
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 115 appear at 72 FR 50038, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 115.63 Allotment of guarantee authority. ( a ) *General.* SBA allots to each PSB Surety a periodic maximum guarantee authority. No SBA guarantee attaches to bonds approved by a PSB Surety if the bonds exceed the allotted authority for the period in which the bonds are approved. No reliance on future authority is permitted. An allotment can be increased only by prior written permission of SBA.
( b ) *Execution of Bid Bonds.* When the PSB Surety Executes a Bid Bond, SBA debits the Surety's allotment for an amount equal to the guarantee percentage of the estimated penal sum of the Final Bond SBA would guarantee if the Contract were awarded. If the Contract is then awarded for an amount other than the bid amount, or if the bid is withdrawn or the Bid Bond guarantee has expired (see § 115.12(c)), SBA debits or credits the Surety's allotment accordingly.
( c ) *Execution of Final Bonds.* If the PSB Surety Executes a guaranteed Final Bond, but not the related Bid Bond, SBA debits the Surety's allotment for an amount equal to the guarantee percentage of the penal sum of the Final Bond. SBA will debit the allotment for increases, and credit the allotment for decreases, in the bond amount.
( d ) *Release and non-issuance of Final Bonds.* The release of Final Bonds upon completion of the Contract does not restore the corresponding allotment. If, however, a PSB Surety approves a Final Bond but never issues the bond, SBA will credit the Surety's allotment for an amount equal to the guarantee percentage of the penal sum of the bond. In that event, the Surety must notify SBA as soon as possible, but in no event later than 5 business days after the non-issuance has been determined. Until the Surety has so notified SBA, it cannot rely on such credit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 3/31/00
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>0000894972
<NAME>AMFM INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          68,804
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  482,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,385
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               585,104
<PP&E>                                         563,023
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,457,596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          310,970
<BONDS>                                      5,783,388
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,166
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,642,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,457,596
<SALES>                                        521,270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               521,270
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  308,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               273,786
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             123,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (145,213)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (10,749)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (155,526)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  6,094
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (161,941)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.75)


</TABLE>
#### Adolph Kugel v. Ostro Construction Company.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 

No. 20-3050-MJ-OTAZO-REYES

IN RE: SEALED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

_______________________________________/ 

UNSEALING ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Government’s Motion to Unseal. Being fully advised, 

it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion is GRANTED, and the docket and the 

following documents are hereby UNSEALED: 

1. Criminal Complaint dated June 29, 2020; 

2. Affidavit in Support of Application for Criminal Complaint dated June 29, 2020; 

3. Arrest Warrants;

4. Criminal Cover Sheet;

5. Motion to Seal; 

6. Sealing Order dated June 29, 2020; and 

7. This Order.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 8th day of July, 2020. 

 ____________________________________ 

 HONORABLE LAUREN F. LOUIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-mj-03050-AOR Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/08/2020 Page 1 of 1
§ 11.12 Administrative claim; who may file. ( a ) A claim for injury to or loss of property may be presented by the owner of the property interest which is the subject of the claim, his or her authorized agent, or legal representative.
( b ) A claim for personal injury may be presented by the injured person or, his or her authorized agent or legal representative.
( c ) A claim based on death may be presented by the executor or administrator of the decedent's estate or by any other person legally entitled to assert such a claim under applicable State law.
( d ) A claim for loss wholly compensated by an insurer with the rights of a subrogee may be presented by the insurer or the insured individually, as their respective interests appear, or jointly. When an insurer presents a claim asserting the rights of a subrogee, he or she shall present with the claim appropriate evidence that he or she has the rights of a subrogee.
( e ) A claim presented by an agent or legal representative shall be presented in the name of the claimant, be signed by the agent or legal representative, show the title of legal capacity of the person signing, and be accompanied by evidence of his or her authority to present a claim on behalf of the claimant as agent, executor, administrator, parent, guardian, or other representative.
#### §§ 136.112-136.129 [Reserved]
### §3006. Affidavit requirements

Any affidavit required of the United States by this chapter may be made on information and belief, if reliable and reasonably necessary, establishing with particularity, to the court's satisfaction, facts supporting the claim of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVI, §3611, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4936.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Nov. 29, 1990, and applicable with respect to certain actions for debts owed the United States pending in court on that effective date, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101–647, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

 Southern District of Florida

VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 

d/b/a VPX SPORTS/ REDLINE/ BANG ENERGY, a 

Florida Corporation,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CHRISTOPHER ALFIERI, an individual, ADAM 

PERRY, an individual, ANDREW LaROCCA, an 

individual, AMY MAROS, an individual and ELEGANCE 

BRANDS, INC., a Delaware corporation,

 Defendants.

_______________________________________________/

Civil Action No.________________

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: Christopher Alfieri

6289 Fernstone Trail NW

Acworth, Georgia 30101

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the 

United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) —

you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney, whose name and address are:

Gregg Metzger, Esq. 

Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Legal Department

1600 North Park Drive

Weston, FL 33326

gregg.metzger@vpxsports.com

service@vpxsports.com

Counsel for Plaintiff 

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also 

must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date: __________ 

_________________________

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 0:20-cv-61307-AHS Document 1-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2020 Page 1 of 3
on (date)

AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any) Christopher Alfieri

was received by me on (date)

I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date)

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of 

abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

, and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is 

designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ 0.00 .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

.

on (date) ; or

; or I returned the summons unexecuted because

Other (specify):

; or

Case 0:20-cv-61307-AHS Document 1-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2020 Page 2 of 3
Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 0:20-cv-61307-AHS Document 1-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2020 Page 3 of 3
No: III-23-001 January 11, 2023

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at Dresden Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Jakob Steffes as the 

new senior resident inspector at the Dresden nuclear power plant in Morris, 

Illinois. He joins NRC resident inspector Courtney St. Peters at the facility.

Steffes joined the NRC in 2011 as a reactor engineer in the Region III 

nuclear safety professional development program. He has served as resident 

inspector at the Duane Arnold nuclear power plant, and most recently as senior 

resident inspector at the Perry nuclear power plant. 

Prior to joining the agency, he served six years in the U.S. Navy, four of 

those years on board the USS Greenville as a reactor operator. 

“Jakob is exceptionally qualified to lead our resident inspector office at 

Dresden. Having been a long-time resident inspector at boiling water reactor facilities, he is knowledgeable 

with all the plant systems at the site, and his leadership will be instrumental for our resident inspector office 

going into the future,” said NRC Region III Administrator Jack Giessner.

Steffes holds a bachelor’s and master’s degree in nuclear engineering and radiological sciences from 

the University of Michigan.

Each commercial nuclear power plant site in the United States has at least two resident inspectors 

who monitor day-to-day operations at the plant. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, 

conducting inspections, monitoring significant work projects and interacting with plant workers and the 

public.

The plant, which is operated by the Constellation Energy Company, is located approximately 

25 miles southwest of Joliet.
#### Provident Savings Life Assurance Society v. City of Omaha et al.

Filed June 9, 1904.

No. 13,615.

Original action to cancel municipal taxes.

*Dismissed.*

*John J. Sullivan, Montgomery & Hall*and *Greene, Breckenridge & Kinsler,*for plaintiff.

*C. C. Wright, contra.*

Ames, C.

This case differs from that of *Aachen & Munich Fire Ins. Co. v. City of Omaha, ante,*p. 112, only in the circumstance that the plaintiff is a life insurance company instead of a fire insurance company. It is unnecessary to repeat our reasons for recommending that the action be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff.

Letton and Oldham, CC., concur.

By the Court:

For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, it is ordered that the action be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff.

Dismissed.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Women's Rights
National Historical Park
New York


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  George W. Pryor
 George W. Pryor was the son of Margaret and George Pryor.
 Last updated: February 26, 2015
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 136 Fall Street
Seneca Falls,
NY
13148
 Phone: 315 568-0024 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
No: III-24-005 April 10, 2024 

Contact: Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663 

 Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662 

NRC Will Hold Public Meeting April 17 

To Discuss Potential Restart of Palisades Nuclear Plant

NRC will hold a hybrid public meeting to discuss the NRC’s Palisades Nuclear Plant Restart Panel’s

activities to independently assess the plant’s readiness to potentially resume operation in a way that ensures

public health and safety. 

The meeting will be held at the Grand Upton Hall, Lake Michigan College, 2755 E. Napier Ave., in 

Benton Harbor. The information for attending virtually or by phone can be found in this meeting notice. 

Palisades permanently ceased operations in May 2022. In early 2023, Holtec International, the 

Palisades license holder, expressed interest in returning the plant to an operational status. The NRC created 

the Palisades restart panel to guide staff efforts to review, inspect, and determine if Palisades could be safely 

returned to operation.

The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the restart panel’s licensing reviews, inspection activities 

and environmental review pertaining to the potential restart. Members of the restart panel will discuss the 

NRC’s review process and offer an opportunity for attendees to ask questions and make comments related to 

the presentation. 

Additional information on a potential Palisades restart can be found on the NRC's website.