alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Vincent Laudano, as Administrator of the Estate of Grace Laudano, Deceased, Appellant, v. New York Rapid Transit Corporation, Respondent.

*713Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
No: III-23-010 May 18, 2023 

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662 

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663 

NRC to Hold Public Meeting to Discuss

Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Performance

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a hybrid public meeting May 24 to discuss the 

2022 safety performance of the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant. The two-unit facility, located in 

Welch, Minnesota, is operated by Northern States Power Company-Minnesota. 

The meeting will be held from 5-6 p.m. Central time at the Red Wing Public Library, 

225 East Avenue, in Red Wing. The public can also access the meeting via Microsoft Teams or by phone. 

The telephone conference number is 301-576-2978, password 977 896 947#. NRC staff responsible for plant 

inspection and oversight, including the resident inspectors based full-time at the site, will make a 

presentation and answer questions from the public at the meeting. 

The NRC determined Prairie Island operated safely during 2022. All inspection findings and 

performance indicators were of very low safety significance. As a result, the plant remains under the NRC’s 

normal level of oversight, which entails thousands of hours of inspection each year. 

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to assess 

plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, commensurate with the 

safety significance of the issues involved. If an inspection finding or performance indicator has more than 

very low safety significance, the NRC increases its oversight. 

Inspections are performed by two NRC resident inspectors assigned to each plant and specialist 

inspectors from the Region III Office in Lisle, Illinois.

The annual assessment letter for Prairie Island is available on the NRC website. Current performance 

information for the site is also available on the NRC website and updated quarterly.
July 6th, 2015

Mr. Philippe Boss

11824 Journeys End Trail

Huntersville, NC 28078

Dear Mr. Boss:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We posted your exemption request on the public docket (No. FAA−2015−1539) on 

May 11, 2015, but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you 

sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the 

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Editorial Note on Part 126
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 126.104 How can a Governor petition for the designation of a Governor-designated covered area? ( a ) For a specific covered area to receive a designation as a Governor-designated covered area, the Governor of the State in which the identified covered area is wholly contained shall include such area in a petition to the Administrator requesting such a designation. In reviewing a request for designation included in such a petition, the Administrator may consider— ( 1 ) The potential for job creation and investment in the covered area;
( 2 ) The demonstrated interest of small business concerns in the covered area to be designated as a Governor-designated covered area;
( 3 ) How State and local government officials have incorporated the covered area into an economic development strategy; and
( 4 ) If the covered area was a HUBZone before becoming the subject of the petition, the impact on the covered area if the Administrator did not approve the petition.
( b ) Each calendar year, a Governor may submit not more than 1 petition described in this section. Such petition shall include all covered areas in a State for which the Governor seeks designation as a Governor-designated covered area, except that the total number of covered areas included in such petition may not exceed 10 percent of the total number of covered areas in the State.
( c ) If the Administrator grants a petition described in this section, the Governor of the Governor-designated covered area shall, not less frequently than annually, submit data to the Administrator certifying that each Governor-designated covered area continues to meet the requirements of paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
( d ) In this section: ( 1 ) The term “covered area” means an area in a State— ( i ) That is located outside of an urbanized area, as determined by the Bureau of the Census;
( ii ) With a population of not more than 50,000; and
( iii ) For which the average unemployment rate is not less than 120 percent of the average unemployment rate of the United States or of the State in which the covered area is located, whichever is less, based on the most recent data available from the American Community Survey conducted by the Bureau of the Census.
( 2 ) The term “Governor” means the chief executive of a State.
( 3 ) The term “State” means each of the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or American Samoa.
[84 FR 62449, Nov. 15, 2019]
### Subpart A—Requirements Relating to Portability, Access, and Renewability
### [§2664. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–312, title III, §301(a), Dec. 17, 2010, 124 Stat. 3300]

Section, added Pub. L. 107–16, title V, §501(b), June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 69, related to termination of applicability of chapter to generation-skipping transfers after Dec. 31, 2009.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal of section applicable to estates of decedents dying, and transfers made after Dec. 31, 2009, except as otherwise provided, see section 301(e) of Pub. L. 111–312, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2010 Amendment note under section 121 of this title.
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Brooklyn Bar Association. Murray Cutler, an Attorney. In the Matter of the Petition of Brooklyn Bar Association. Abraham Stember, an Attorney. In the Matter of the Petition of Brooklyn Bar Association. Vincent J. Ferreri, an Attorney.

Present— Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ. [See 276 App. Div. 775.]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty
Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of
the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Trust. Date: August 9, 2004 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR
WILLIAMS COAL SEAM GAS ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
    /s/ RON E. HOOPERRon E. Hooper,Senior Vice President, Royalty Management
Bank of America, N.A. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust and will be retained by
Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. Page 25
#### § 107.1540 Distributions by Licensee—Prioritized Payments and Adjustments.

After you compute Prioritized Payments and Adjustments under § 107.1520, you must distribute them in accordance with this § 107.1540. You must notify SBA of any planned distribution under this section 10 business days before the distribution date, unless SBA permits otherwise.

[61 FR 3189, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 63 FR 5871, Feb. 5, 1998; 88 FR 46012, July 18, 2023]
EXHIBIT 5

Case 1:20-cv-22578-MGC Document 1-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-22578-MGC Document 1-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2020 Page 2 of 2
§ 106.202 What are the minimum requirements applicable to Cosponsored Activities? While SBA may subject a Cosponsored Activity to additional requirements through internal policy, procedure and the Cosponsorship Agreement, the following requirements apply to all Cosponsored Activities: ( a ) Cosponsored Activities must be set forth in a written Cosponsorship Agreement signed by the Administrator (or designee) and each Cosponsor;
( b ) Appropriate recognition must be given to SBA and each Cosponsor but shall not constitute or imply an endorsement by SBA of any Cosponsor or any Cosponsor's products or services;
( c ) Any printed or electronically generated material used to publicize or conduct the Cosponsored Activity, including any material which has been developed, prepared or acquired by a Cosponsor, must be approved in advance by the Responsible Program Official and must include a prominent disclaimer stating that the Cosponsored Activity does not constitute or imply an endorsement by SBA of any Cosponsor or the Cosponsor's products or services;
( d ) No Cosponsor shall make a profit on any Cosponsored Activity. SBA grantees who earn program income on Cosponsored Activities must use that program income for the Cosponsored Activity;
( e ) Participant Fee(s) charged for a Cosponsored Activity may not exceed the minimal amount needed to cover the anticipated direct costs of the Cosponsored Activity and must be liquidated prior to other sources of funding for the Cosponsored Activity. If SBA charges a Participant Fee, the collection of the Participant Fees is subject to internal SBA policies and procedures as well as applicable U.S. Treasury rules and guidelines;
( f ) SBA may not provide a Cosponsor with lists of names and addresses of small business concerns compiled by SBA which are otherwise protected by law or policy from disclosure; and
( g ) Written approval must be obtained as outlined in § 106.204.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Virgin Islands
National ParkVirgin Islands
Case 1:20-cv-22427-MGC Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 1 of 1
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2023

- 0701

_____________________________
M ICHAEL C. M C G ILL , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. James M. Colaw , Judge

. March 1, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , R OWE and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Michael C. McGill, pro se
, Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Christina Piotrowski, Assistant Attorney General
, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Irving Friedman, Individually and as Coadministrator of the Estate of Aron Storch, Deceased, Appellant, v. Lena Rosenthal, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ. [See 272 App. Div. 1059.]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Shore Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott C. Harvard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: March 20, 2006

 

This certificate accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and will not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

 

78
#### Charles Ward Hall, Respondent, v. Alfred McEwen and Margaret R. McEwen, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mo opinion. Jenks, P. J., Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Burr, J., dissented.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CONNELL SPAIN, Defendant, and CONNELL SPAIN, SR., Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-82-60-N) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 23, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Connell Spain, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Connell Spain, Sr., appeals the district court’s denying his request for court records pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (1994). We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Spain , No. CR-82-60-N (E.D. Va. June 19, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Catherine Hagmayer v. Novelty Stamp Company.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 475]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ475.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 3900]]

Public Law 108-475
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  5505 Stevens Way in San Diego, California, as the ``Earl B. Gilliam/
 Imperial Avenue Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 2004 -  [H.R. 
                                5364]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5505 
Stevens Way in San Diego, California, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Earl B. Gilliam/Imperial Avenue Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Earl B. Gilliam/Imperial 
Avenue Post Office Building''.

    Approved December 21, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5364:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Nov. 17, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 7, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Technical Assistance Request Regarding Electronic Calibration of Survey Instruments

## HPPOS-279 PDR-9306140215

See the memorandum from J. E. Glenn to R. R. Bellamy dated October 30, 1991.

This memo responds to a technical assistance request by Region I, dated September 16, 1991, regarding a determination of the acceptability of the survey meter calibration protocol proposed by St. Barnabas Medical Center. The proposed protocol would allow the licensee, St. Barnabas Medical Center, to do calibrations of lower ranges on GM instruments with an electronic pulse generator.

The substitution of an electronic pulse generator for radiation from a calibrated radioactive source to calibrate a radiation detection instrument is not acceptable. Use of the electronic pulse generator will properly calibrate the electronics, but will not determine whether the detector is operating properly. The licensee indicated in the TAR that Ludlum Measurements, Inc., used only electronic means for calibrations on the lower scales. Ludlum Measurements, Inc., was contacted to verify this assertion. A Ludlum representative clarified that they first calibrate the electronics with the electronic pulse generator, then reattach the probe and make measurements in a radiation field to find the conversion factor from counts per minute to millirem per hour.

If the licensee determines that due to the fluctuations of background radiation, precise calibration of the lowest scale of the instrument is not possible, the licensee may choose to label the lowest scale with the most conservative three methods. The first possibility is to label the lowest scale by the average correction factor obtained from the radiation measurements. The second possibility is to make a graph from which the correction factor may be deduced. The third possibility is to show that the scale was checked for function but not calibrated, or indicate that the scale is not operative. [NOTE: If this scale is necessary to show compliance with NRC's regulations or the licensee's license, then the instrument will be considered out of calibration and in noncompliance.]

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 20.1501, 10 CFR 35.51

**Subject codes:** 6.4

**Applicability:** All

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 30, 2017
§ 102.29 Requests for an accounting of record disclosures. ( a ) *How made and addressed.* Except where accountings of disclosures are not required to be kept (as stated in paragraph (b) of this section), an individual may make a request for an accounting of any disclosure that has been made by the SBA to another person, organization, or agency of any record in a system of records about him or her. This accounting contains the date, nature, and purpose of each disclosure, as well as the name and address of the person, organization, or agency to which the disclosure was made. The request for an accounting should identify each particular record in question and should be made by writing directly to the SBA office that maintains the record, following the procedures in § 102.24.
( b ) *Where accountings are not required.* Offices are not required to provide accountings where they relate to: ( 1 ) Disclosures for which accountings are not required to be kept; disclosures that are made to employees within the SBA and disclosures that are made under the FOIA;
( 2 ) Disclosures made to law enforcement agencies for authorized law enforcement activities in response to written requests from those law enforcement agencies specifying the civil or criminal law enforcement activities for which the disclosures are sought; or
( 3 ) Disclosures made from law enforcement systems of records that have been exempted from accounting requirements under Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) or (k) by notice published in the Federal Register.
( c ) *Appeals.* An individual may appeal a denial of a request for an accounting to the FOI/PA Office in the same manner as a denial of a request for access to records (see § 102.27), and the same procedures will be followed.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 17

**Question 17:** Will QA Category 1 requirements discussed in Regulatory Guide 1.26 have to be changed due to offsite dose requirements of 0.5 rem being changed to 0.1 rem in the revised Part 20?

**Answer:** The revised Part 20 does not change the QA Category 1 requirements. The 0.5 rem bench-mark is for design considerations; therefore, it will likely remain the same.

(Reference: 10 CFR 50 Appendix B)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, November 08, 2017
EXHIBIT 112 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-113 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 1 of

6
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-113 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 2 of

6
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-113 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 3 of

6
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-113 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 4 of

6
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-113 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 5 of

6
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-113 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 6 of

6