T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T NI C OL AS MAR T I NE Z - VE DO Y, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 73105 A ge nc yN o. A 092- 251- 384 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r24, 2013 ** B e f o r e : R A W L I N S O N , N .R . S M I T H , an dC H R I S T E N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . N i c ol a s M art i ne z - V e doy , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons pr o s e f or r e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rs um m ar i l ya f f i rm i ng a n im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s r e m o v a l o r d e r . O u rju r is d ic tio n is g o v e rn e db y8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . We d i s m i s s th e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. 

# FI LED SEP 27 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 73105 2 W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the agency’ s r em ov alorder because M art i nezV e d o yis r e m o v ab le f

o ra n a g g r a v a te df

e lo n yc r im e o f

v io le n c e b a s e do n h is conv i ct i on for f

i rs t -degree re si dent i albu rgl ary i n v i ol at i on of C al i forni a P enal C o d e § 4 5 9 . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( C ) ; L op ez -Cardo na v. H older , 662 F . 3d 11 10 , 11 12 (9th C i r. 20 11 ) ( fi rs t -degree re si dent i albu rgl ary und erC al i forni a P enal C o d e § 4 5 9 co n st i tu t es a cri m e o f v i o l en ce th at“ b y i t s n atu re, i n v o l v es a s ubs t a nt i a l r i s k tha tphy s i c a l f or c e a ga i ns tthe pe r s on orpr ope rtyof a nothe rm aybe us e d i n the c our s e of

c om m i tt i ng the of

f e ns e ” ) . T hi s c onvi c t i on i s f i na l f or im m ig r a tio n p u rp o s e s , an dth e v a lid ityo f th is c o n v ic tio n is n o t p r o p e r lyb e f o r e u s . See P lan es v. H

older , 6 5 2 F .3 d9 9 1 , 9 9 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 1 ) ; R am i rez- V i l lal pa ndo v. H older , 6 4 5 F .3 d1 0 3 5 , 1 0 4 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 1 ) ( “A p e titio n e rm ayn o t c o lla te r a lly a tta c kh is s ta te c o u rt c o n v ic tio n o n ap e titio n f o rr e v ie w o f

aB I A d e c is io n .” ) . M a rt i ne z - V e doydoe s notr a i s e ac ol or abl e c ons t i tut i ona l c l a i m orl e ga l que s t i on th a t w o u ldin v o k e o u rju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( D ) . W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o c ons i de rM art i ne z - V e doy ’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons b e c au s e h e f

a ile dto r a is e th e m b e f

o r e th e B I A , an dth e r e b yf a ile dto e x h au s t h is ad m i n i strat i v e rem ed i es. Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 35 8 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ) .P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DI S MI S S E D.