alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 102.9 Administrative appeals. ( a ) *Requirements for making an appeal.* A requester may appeal any adverse determinations to the FOI/PA Office. The contact information is contained in § 102.3(a)(1). Examples of adverse determinations are provided in § 102.6(e). The requester must make the appeal in writing and to be considered timely it must be postmarked, or in the case of electronic submissions, transmitted, within 90 working days after the date of the response. The appeal should clearly identify the component's determination that is being appealed and the assigned request number. To facilitate handling, the requester should mark both the appeal letter and envelope, or subject line of the electronic transmission, “Freedom of Information Act Appeal.”
( b ) *Adjudication of appeals.* ( 1 ) The Chief, FOI/PA or designee will act on behalf of the SBA on all appeals under this section.
( 2 ) An appeal ordinarily will not be adjudicated if the request becomes a matter of FOIA litigation.
( 3 ) On receipt of any appeal involving classified information, the FOI/PA Office shall take appropriate action to ensure compliance with Executive Orders 13467 and 13526.
( c ) *Decisions on appeals.* A decision on an appeal will be made in writing. A decision that upholds a component's determination will contain a statement that identifies the reasons for the affirmance, including any FOIA exemptions applied. The decision will provide the requester with notification of the statutory right to file a lawsuit and will inform the requester of the mediation services offered by OGIS as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. If a component's decision is remanded or modified on appeal, the requester will be notified of that determination in writing. The component will thereafter, further process the request in accordance with that appeal determination and respond directly to the requester.
( d ) Time limit for issuing appeal decision. The statutory time limit for responding to appeals is generally 20 working days after receipt. However, the Appeals Officer may extend the time limit for responding to an appeal provided the circumstances set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(i) are met.
( e ) *Engaging in dispute resolution services provided by OGIS.* Mediation is a voluntary process. If a component agrees to participate in the mediation services provided by OGIS, it will actively engage as a partner to the process in an attempt to resolve the dispute.
( f ) *When an appeal is required.* Before seeking review by a court of a component's adverse determination, a requester generally must first submit a timely administrative appeal.
### §1058. Mergers and consolidations of plans or transfers of plan assets

A pension plan may not merge or consolidate with, or transfer its assets or liabilities to, any other plan after September 2, 1974, unless each participant in the plan would (if the plan then terminated) receive a benefit immediately after the merger, consolidation, or transfer which is equal to or greater than the benefit he would have been entitled to receive immediately before the merger, consolidation, or transfer (if the plan had then terminated). The preceding sentence shall not apply to any transaction to the extent that participants either before or after the transaction are covered under a multiemployer plan to which subchapter III of this chapter applies.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §208, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 865; Pub. L. 96–364, title IV, §402(b)(1), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1299.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–364 substituted provisions respecting applicability of preceding sentence to transactions under a covered multiemployer plan to which subchapter III applies, for provisions relating to applicability of paragraph to a multiemployer plan only to extent determined by Corporation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–364 effective Sept. 26, 1980, except as specifically provided, see section 1461(e) of this title.
# Euroopan unionin C 27A/3. h

| | ISSN 1725-2490 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 27A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 49. vuosikerta3. helmikuu 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2490

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 27A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

49. vuosikerta3. helmikuu 2006

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Tiedotteita |
| | Euroopan lääkevirasto |
| 2006/C 027A/1 | Rekrytointi Euroopan lääkevirastoon (Lontoo) | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

III   Tiedotteita

Euroopan lääkevirasto

2006/C 027A/1

Rekrytointi Euroopan lääkevirastoon (Lontoo)

1

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

III Tiedotteita

Euroopan lääkevirasto

| 3.2.2006 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 27/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2006

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 27/1

---

REKRYTOINTI EUROOPAN LÄÄKEVIRASTOON (LONTOO)

(2006/C 27 A/01)

Virasto on vastuussa ihmisille tarkoitettujen lääkkeiden ja eläinlääkkeiden arvioinnin ja valvonnan yhteensovittamisesta Euroopan unionissa (ks. Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetus (EY) N:o 726/2004, annettu 31 päivänä maaliskuuta 2004,
  Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti L  136, 30. huhtikuuta 2004, s. 1). Euroopan lääkevirasto EMEA perustettiin tammikuussa 1995. Virastolla on paljon tiivistä yhteydenpitoa Euroopan komissioon, EU:n 25 jäsenvaltioon, ETA/EFTA-maihin sekä moniin muihin ryhmiin hallitusten tasolla ja yksityisellä sektorilla.

Lisätietoja EMEA:sta ja sen toiminnasta on saatavissa Internetistä osoitteessa http://www.emea.eu.int

Euroopan lääkearviointivirasto järjestää valintamenettelyn, jonka perusteella laaditaan varallaololuettelo seuraavista toimista:

EMEA/A/222: Ylilääkäri

(Senior Medical Officer) (A*12)

Valinnassa menestyneet hakijat otetaan varallaololuetteloon ja heille voidaan tarjota talousarviotilanteesta riippuen Euroopan yhteisöjen muuta henkilöstöä koskevien palvelussuhteen ehtojen mukaisesti (Euroopan yhteisöjen virallinen lehti
  L 56, 4. maaliskuuta 1968) viiden vuoden sopimus, joka voidaan uusia.

Työpaikka on Lontoossa.

Hakijoiden on oltava Euroopan yhteisöjen jäsenvaltioiden tai Islannin, Norjan tai Liechtensteinin kansalaisia ja heillä on oltava täydet kansalaisoikeudet.

Kaikki ehdot, työnkuvaukset ja tarvittava hakemuslomake on saatavissa EMEAn web-sivustolta osoitteesta http://www.emea.eu.int/htms/general/admin/recruit/recruitnew.htm.
  Hakulomake on toimitettava asianmukaisesti allekirjoitettuna ja päivättynä yhdessä kaikkien todistavien asiakirjojen kanssa viimeistään
  17. maaliskuuta 2006
  (postileiman päiväys) seuraavaan osoitteeseen:
  EMEA — Head of Personnel, 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London E14 4HB, United Kingdom (puh. (44-207) 418 84 00; faksi (44-207) 418 84 16).

Tulevaisuudessa virallista lehteä ei enää lähetetä automaattisesti postituslistoille. Jos haluat saada julkaisuja koskevan ilmoituksen, rekisteröidy osoitteessa http://www.emea.eu.int/ ”Online Mailing Service”.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7749

JAMES MAXWELL GIBSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; J. JOSEPH CURRAN,

JR., The Attorney General of the State of

Maryland,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97-

1209-L)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 14, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Maxwell Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court.

Gibson v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-1209-L (D. Md. Nov. 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 522 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 522

   To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to 
  include a link to a 100-word plain language summary of the proposed 
                                 rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                March 2 (legislative day, March 1), 2021

  Mr. Lankford (for himself, Ms. Sinema, Mr. Risch, and Mr. Johnson) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
        Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to 
  include a link to a 100-word plain language summary of the proposed 
                                 rule.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Accountability Through 
Transparency Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO POST A 100-WORD SUMMARY TO REGULATIONS.GOV.

    Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) the Internet address of a summary of not more than 
        100 words in length of the proposed rule, in plain language, 
        that shall be posted on the Internet website under section 
        206(d) of the E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) 
        (commonly known as regulations.gov).''.
                                 <all>
```
### §4377. Definitions and special rules

#### (a) Definitions

For purposes of this subchapter—

#### (1) Accident and health coverage

The term "accident and health coverage" means any coverage which, if provided by an insurance policy, would cause such policy to be a specified health insurance policy (as defined in section 4375(c)).

#### (2) Insurance policy

The term "insurance policy" means any policy or other instrument whereby a contract of insurance is issued, renewed, or extended.

#### (3) United States

The term "United States" includes any possession of the United States.

#### (b) Treatment of governmental entities

#### (1) In general

For purposes of this subchapter—

(A) the term "person" includes any governmental entity, and

(B) notwithstanding any other law or rule of law, governmental entities shall not be exempt from the fees imposed by this subchapter except as provided in paragraph (2).

#### (2) Treatment of exempt governmental programs

In the case of an exempt governmental program, no fee shall be imposed under section 4375 or section 4376 on any covered life under such program.

#### (3) Exempt governmental program defined

For purposes of this subchapter, the term "exempt governmental program" means—

(A) any insurance program established under title XVIII of the Social Security Act,

(B) the medical assistance program established by title XIX or XXI of the Social Security Act,

(C) any program established by Federal law for providing medical care (other than through insurance policies) to individuals (or the spouses and dependents thereof) by reason of such individuals being members of the Armed Forces of the United States or veterans, and

(D) any program established by Federal law for providing medical care (other than through insurance policies) to members of Indian tribes (as defined in section 4(d) of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act).

#### (c) Treatment as tax

For purposes of subtitle F, the fees imposed by this subchapter shall be treated as if they were taxes.

#### (d) No cover over to possessions

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no amount collected under this subchapter shall be covered over to any possession of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 111–148, title VI, §6301(e)(2)(A), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 746.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Social Security Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(3)(A), (B), is act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620. Titles XVIII, XIX, and XXI of the Act are classified generally to subchapters XVIII (§1395 et seq.), XIX (§1396 et seq.), and XXI (§1397aa et seq.), respectively, of chapter 7 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1305 of Title 42 and Tables.

Section 4(d) of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(3)(D), is classified to section 1603(d) of Title 25, Indians.
In June 1776, a group of over 300 people, 700 horses and mules, and 300 cows

arrived in Alta California. It was the first big group from New Spain to settle the 

area that became San Francisco. Some had started the difficult 1,800-mile trip 

from Culiacán in the spring of 1775. They had already traveled 600 miles north 

when they passed through Tumacácori and Tubac in October.

Every morning their leader, Colonel Juan Bautista de Anza, called out in Spanish, 

¡Vayan subiendo! (Everyone mount up!) Men, women, children, and soldiers 

would start walking or start riding mules or horses. They had no wagons, just 

mules, to carry their loads, so they had to choose supplies carefully. They had to 

bring everything they needed for the long trip. When they arrived in California 

they would need tools to build houses.

Pretend that you are 

one of the settlers. Mark 

what you and your 

family should take with 

you. 

San Francisco

Presidio of Monterey

Mission San Antonio

Mission San Luis Obispo

Mission 

San Gabriel

Colorado Crossing

San Xavier 

del Bac

Tumacácori 

Horcasitas

Sinaloa

Culiacán

Colorado 

Baja California

Alta California

Salt

Gila River

Santa Cruz

River

Agua

Fria

River

NEW SP AIN 

Pack, Trek, Build!

You can travel on the 

Juan Bautista de Anza 

National Historic Trail. 

For more information, 

visit www.nps.gov/juba
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                         9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,249
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,491
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    112,436
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        258,144
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 384,088
<DEPOSITS>                                     263,167
<SHORT-TERM>                                    54,843
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,692
<LONG-TERM>                                     16,267
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           234
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 384,088
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,638
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,285
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   366
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,289
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,801
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,101
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,387
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      674
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 187
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,511
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,003
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,003
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,858
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.69
<LOANS-NON>                                        980
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,787
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,472
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      488
<RECOVERIES>                                        33
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,691
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,691
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
### §3015. Discovery as to debtor's financial condition

(a) In General.—Except as provided in subsection (b), in an action or proceeding under subchapter B or C, the United States may have discovery regarding the financial condition of the debtor in the manner in which discovery is authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in an action on a claim for a debt.

(b) Limitation.—Subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to an action or proceeding under subchapter B unless there is a reasonable likelihood that the debt involved exceeds $50,000.

(Added Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVI, §3611, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4939.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (a), are set out in the Appendix to this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Nov. 29, 1990, and applicable with respect to certain actions for debts owed the United States pending in court on that effective date, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101–647, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.
### §1783. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–220, title I, §199(b)(2), Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1059

Section, Pub. L. 97–300, title IV, §499, as added Pub. L. 102–367, title IV, §407, Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1093, authorized microenterprise grants program.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 2000, see section 199(c)(2)(B) of Pub. L. 105–220, set out as a note under section 1501 of this title.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

OLIN MORRIS and ANNETTE )

MORRIS, as personal representatives )

on behalf of the Estate of Christopher )

Morris, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2664

)

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF )

TRUSTEES; WINTER HAVEN )

HOSPITAL, INC.; CARLTON )

CARMICHAEL HAMILTON, M.D.; and )

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA )

JACKSONVILLE PHYSICIANS, INC. )

)

Appellees. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed July 12, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk

County; Larry Helms, Judge.

Rebecca Bowen Creed of Creed & 

Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville, and Timothy

H. David and D. Paul McCaskill of David

& Philpot, P.L., Longwood, for

Appellants.

Christin Davis Graves and James

Parker-Flynn of Carlton Fields,

Tallahassee, for Appellee University

of Florida Board of Trustees.
- 2 -

Dinah Stein and Sharon R. Vosseller

of Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, P.A.;

Miami; and John W. Bocchino of Beytin,

McLaughlin, McLaughlin, O'Hara,

Bocchino & Bolin, P.A.; Maitland, for

Appellee Winter Haven Hospital.

No appearance for Appellees Carlton

Carmichael Hamilton, M.D., and

University Of Florida Jacksonville

Physicians, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
No: 23-036 June 15, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC, Polish Regulators Renew Cooperation Agreement,

Including New Reactor Activities

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Poland’s nuclear regulator, the National 

Atomic Energy Agency (known as PAA), have renewed their cooperation agreement for the next 

five years. Going forward, the cooperation will include exchanging information on 

Westinghouse’s large AP1000 and GE Hitachi’s small modular BWRX-300 reactor designs. 

“We look forward to continuing to work with our PAA counterparts, sharing our decades 

of reactor experience as Poland stands up its civilian nuclear power program,” said NRC Chair 

Christopher Hanson. “We’re eager to provide what we’ve learned in certifying and licensing the 

AP1000s at the Vogtle site in Georgia. We’ll continue sharing information as we move from 

pre-application work to a full review of the BWRX-300 for U.S. use. This cooperation with 

Poland expands on our existing technical collaboration on small modular and advanced reactor 

designs with our Canadian counterparts.” 

The NRC’s cooperation with the PAA has been ongoing since 2010, when the first 

bilateral arrangement between the two agencies was signed. This is one of more than 50 bilateral 

agreements the NRC has signed with overseas regulatory counterparts over the past 40 years to 

exchange technical and regulatory information to improve nuclear safety around the world. 

These agreements are at the core of the NRC’s international activities, which support the 

agency’s mission of protecting public health and safety, promoting the common defense and 

security, and protecting the environment. The NRC’s cooperative efforts also support broader 

U.S. domestic and international interests.
#### Salvatore V. Cataldo, Appellant, v. John Di Serio et al., Respondents.

In an action for judgment declaring appellant to be the equitable owner Of certain real property, and for other relief, judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.