alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Food Safety While Hiking, Camping

& Boating

How to Find the USDA Establishment (EST) Number

on Food Packaging

Food Safety Information

United States Department of Agriculture

Food Safety and Inspection Service

Food Safety Questions?

Ask Karen!

FSIS’ automated response

system can provide food safety

information

24/7 and a

live chat

during

Hotline

hours.

Call the USDA Meat & Poultry Hotline

If you have a question

about meat, poultry, or

egg products, call the

USDA Meat and Poultry

Hotline toll free at

1-888-MPHotline

(1-888-674-6854);

TTY: 1-800-256-7072.

 The Hotline is open yearround Monday through

Friday from 10 a.m. to

4 p.m. ET (English or

Spanish). Recorded

food safety messages

are available 24 hours a

day. Check out the

FSIS Web site at

www.fsis.usda.gov.

The USDA is an equal opportunity

 provider and employer.

April 2010

The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is the public health

agency in the U.S. Department of Agriculture responsible for ensuring

that the nation’s commercial supply of meat, poultry, and egg products

is safe, wholesome, and correctly labeled and packaged.

Send E-mail questions to MPHotline.fsis@usda.gov.

All containers of meat, poultry, and egg products must be labeled with a USDA mark of inspection and establishment (EST) number, which is assigned to the plant where the product was produced. Here’s where to find the

establishment number on a USDA-inspected product.

MEAT Product “EST” Number

Besides appearing on meat product

packaging, the Est. Number is also

permitted to appear off the exterior of

the container (for example, on a metal

clip to close casings) or on

aluminum trays placed within containers. If so,

a statement of its location must be printed

near or connected to the official inspection

legend, such as “EST. No. on Metal Clip” or

“EST. No. on Pan.” The number may not be

applied over any required labeling information.

Establishment numbers for poultry

plants can be identified with the

prefix “P” -- for “Plant” -- prior to the

number. The plant number is also

permitted to appear off the exterior

of the container (for example, on a

metal clip to close casings) or on

aluminum trays placed within containers. If so, a

statement of its location must be printed near or

connected to the official inspection legend, such as

“P. No. on Metal Clip” or “P No. on Pan.” The number

may not be applied over any required labeling

information.

POULTRY Product “EST” Number

Establishment numbers for processed egg

products are found within the egg products

shield or on the principal display panel prefaced with the term “Plant” or the prefix “P.”

The establishment number may appear on the package within the USDA mark of inspection such as

pictured on this page. It may also appear elsewhere

on the exterior of the package container or package

labeling (for example, on the lid of a can) if shown in a

prominent and legible manner and in a size sufficient

to insure easy visibility and recognition.

EGG PRODUCTS “EST” Number

USDA Photo

AskKaren.gov
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/20/2003 Page 1 of 1
(No. 985

Claimant awarded $213.75.)

#### County of Will, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 19, 1927.*

*Reimbursement*— State *liable for expenses of trial of convict.*This case is controlled by the decision of the court in the case of *County óf Will*v *State, supra.*

Hjalmar Rehn, States Attorney, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney *General ;*Prank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the court:

This claim is filed by Will county, Illinois, for $213.75 paid out by claimant for costs, fees and expenses incurred in the prosecution of Howard Johnson, alias Howard Talbert, for the murder of Jerry Meyers on September 15, 1925. At the time of the killing - both Johnson and Meyers were serving sentences in the State Penitentiary at Joliet, and the murder was committed in said penitentiary. Johnson was indicted for murder by the Will county grand jury at the September *259term, 1925, of the Circuit Court, and at the same term he was arraigned and plead not guilty. After a jury was empaneled he withdrew this plea and plead guilty to the charge of murder, and was sentenced to the penitentiary for his natural life.

The Attorney General has filed a statement on behalf of the State, and attached as an exhibit to his statement a letter from the Warden of the State Penitentiary at Joliet, in which he admits the facts alleged in the claimant’s declaration and consents to an award in favor of claimant in the sum of $213.75, the amount claimed in the' declaration.

Under the provisions of Section 39 of Chapter 108 of Hurd’s Revised Statute of 1917 and the admitted facts in this case, claimant is entitled to be reimbursed by the State for the amounts paid out by it on account of the prosecution of Johnson, and we therefore allow claimant an award in the sum of $213.75.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.354 Creditworthiness.

In determining repayment ability, SBA shall not consider the personal assets of the employee-owners of the trust. SBA shall consider the earnings history and projected future earnings of the employer small business. SBA may consider the business and management experience of the employee-owners.
Case 9:20-cv-81008-DMM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/26/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case 9:20-cv-81008-DMM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/26/2020 Page 2 of 2
§ 305.5 Project administration by District Organization. ( a ) When a District Organization is not the Recipient or co-Recipient of Investment Assistance, the District Organization may administer the Project for the Recipient if EDA determines fulfillment of the following conditions: ( 1 ) The Recipient has requested (either in the application or by separate written request) that the District Organization for the Region in which the Project is located administer the Project;
( 2 ) The Recipient certifies and EDA finds that: ( i ) Administration of the Project is beyond the capacity of the Recipient's current staff and would require hiring additional staff or contracting for such services;
( ii ) No local organization or business exists that could administer the Project in a more efficient or cost-effective manner than the staff of the District Organization; and
( iii ) The staff of the District Organization would administer the Project without sub-contracting the work; and
( 3 ) The allowable costs for the administration of the Project by the District Organization's staff will not exceed the amount that would be allowable to the Recipient.
( b ) EDA must approve the request either by approving the application in which the request is made or by separate specific written approval.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-108 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, August 1, 1996)

NRC, OSHA SIGN AGREEMENT ON WORKER PROTECTION

AT URANIUM ENRICHMENT PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Occupational

Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) of the U.S. Department of

Labor have agreed on a coordinated worker protection effort at

the two gaseous diffusion plants near Piketon, Ohio, and Paducah,

Kentucky.

The USEC Privatization Act requires the two agencies to

enter into such an agreement.

U.S. Enrichment Corporation (USEC) operates the plants under

a lease from the Department of Energy (DOE), the owner and former

operator. The plants use a gaseous diffusion process to enrich

uranium hexaflouride gas in the uranium-235 isotope, so that the

material can be used as nuclear fuel in civilian nuclear power

plants.

The Energy Policy Act of 1992, which established USEC, also

required the NRC to set up a process for certifying that the

enrichment plants are operated in a way that ensures protection

of public health and safety. The act also made the operator of

the plants subject to the Occupational Safety and Health Act,

which OSHA administers.

NRC is currently reviewing USEC's applications for

certification. DOE will continue to regulate the plants until

the NRC assumes jurisdiction following a planned 120-day

transition period after NRC's initial certification.

Under the NRC-OSHA agreement, the NRC will apply its

standards to working conditions involving radiological hazards,

while OSHA will apply its standards to conditions involving nonradiological hazards. Both agencies will apply their standards

to conditions involving a combination of hazards (for example, if

there are both radioactive materials and other hazardous

chemicals in the same work area).
The agreement specifies how NRC and OSHA will coordinate

their efforts--in areas such as inspections, issuance of

citations, enforcement actions and response to worker safety or

health complaints--to avoid duplication of effort and eliminate

gaps in coverage.

If NRC or OSHA identifies a conflict between the two

agencies' requirements--or if USEC perceives a conflict--both

agencies will work together to resolve the issue promptly.

James M. Taylor, Executive Director for Operations, NRC, and

Joseph A. Dear, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational

Safety and Health, signed the agreement for their respective

agencies.

###
§ 9269.3-4 Range management. ( a ) *Grazing administration—exclusive of Alaska* — ( 1 ) *Unlawful enclosures or occupancy.* Section 1 of the Act of February 25, 1885 (43 U.S.C. 1061), declares any enclosure of public lands made or maintained by any party, association, or corporation who “had no claim or color of title made or acquired in good faith, or an asserted right thereto, by or under claim, made in good faith with a view to entry thereof at the proper land office under the general laws of the United States at the time any such enclosure was or shall be made” to be unlawful and prohibts the maintenance or erection thereof. (See § 9269.3-4(a)(2) of this title).
( 2 ) *Penalties.* Under section 4 of the Act of February 25, 1885 (43 U.S.C. 1064), any person violating any of the provisions of this Act, whether as owner, part owner, or agent, or who shall aid, abet, counsel, advise, or assist in any violation hereof, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and fined a sum not exceeding $1,000, or be imprisoned not exceeding one year, or both, for each offense.
( b ) *Grazing administration; Alaska; livestock.* ( 1 ) Grazing livestock upon, allowing livestock to drift and graze on, or driving livestock across lands that are subject to lease or permit under the provisions of part 9230 of this title or within a stock driveway, without a lease or other authorization from the Bureau of Land Management, is prohibited and constitutes trespass. Trespassers will be liable in damages to the United States for forage consumed and for injury to Federal property, and may be subject to criminal prosecution for such unlawful acts. A lessee who grazes livestock in violation of the terms and conditions of his lease by exceeding numbers specified, or by allowing the livestock to be on Federal land in an area or at a time different from that designated in his lease shall be in default and shall be subject to the provisions of § 4220.7 (g) and (h) of this title.
( 2 ) *Penalties.* Under section 2 of the Taylor Grazing Act, any person who willfully grazes livestock in such areas without such authority shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $500.
( c ) *Grazing administration; Alaska; reindeer.* ( 1 ) Any use of the Federal lands for reindeer grazing purposes, unless authorized by a valid permit issued in accordance with the regulations in part 4300 of this title, is unlawful and is prohibited.
( 2 ) *Penalties.* Any person who willfully violates any of the rules and regulations in part 4300 of this title shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by imprisonment for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than $500.
( d ) *Wild free-roaming horse and burro protection, management, and control.* [Reserved]
### §2676. Judgment as bar

The judgment in an action under section 1346(b) of this title shall constitute a complete bar to any action by the claimant, by reason of the same subject matter, against the employee of the government whose act or omission gave rise to the claim.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 984.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §931(b) (Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, §410(b), 60 Stat. 844).

Section constitutes the first sentence of section 931(b) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provisions of such section 931(b) are incorporated in section 2675 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### Senate Revision Amendment

This section was eliminated by Senate amendment. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.
#### § 123.21 What is a mitigation measure?

A mitigation measure is something done for the purpose of protecting property and occupants against disaster related damage. You may implement mitigation measures after a disaster occurs (post-disaster) to protect against recurring disaster related damage, or before a disaster occurs (pre-disaster) to protect against future disaster related damage. Examples of mitigation measures include building retaining walls, sea walls, grading and contouring land, elevating flood prone structures, relocating utilities, constructing a safe room or similar storm shelter (if such safe room or similar storm shelter is constructed in accordance with applicable standards issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency), or retrofitting structures to protect against high winds, earthquakes, flood, wildfires, or other physical disasters. Section 123.107 specifically addresses post-disaster mitigation for home disaster loans, and § 123.204 specifically addresses post-disaster mitigation for businesses.

[67 FR 62337, Oct. 7, 2002, as amended at 81 FR 67903, Oct. 3, 2016; 85 FR 12864, Mar. 5, 2020]
§ 19.300 Admission. ( a ) *General.* No person shall, on the basis of sex, be denied admission, or be subjected to discrimination in admission, by any recipient to which §§ 19.300 through §§ 19.310 apply, except as provided in §§ 19.225 and 19.230.
( b ) *Specific prohibitions.* ( 1 ) In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which §§ 19.300 through 19.310 apply shall not: ( i ) Give preference to one person over another on the basis of sex, by ranking applicants separately on such basis, or otherwise;
( ii ) Apply numerical limitations upon the number or proportion of persons of either sex who may be admitted; or
( iii ) Otherwise treat one individual differently from another on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for admission that has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless the use of such test or criterion is shown to predict validly success in the education program or activity in question and alternative tests or criteria that do not have such a disproportionately adverse effect are shown to be unavailable.
( c ) *Prohibitions relating to marital or parental status.* In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which §§ 19.300 through 19.310 apply: ( 1 ) Shall not apply any rule concerning the actual or potential parental, family, or marital status of a student or applicant that treats persons differently on the basis of sex;
( 2 ) Shall not discriminate against or exclude any person on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom, or establish or follow any rule or practice that so discriminates or excludes;
( 3 ) Subject to § 19.235(d), shall treat disabilities related to pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom in the same manner and under the same policies as any other temporary disability or physical condition; and
( 4 ) Shall not make pre-admission inquiry as to the marital status of an applicant for admission, including whether such applicant is “Miss” or “Mrs.” A recipient may make pre-admission inquiry as to the sex of an applicant for admission, but only if such inquiry is made equally of such applicants of both sexes and if the results of such inquiry are not used in connection with discrimination prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN ISTRICT OF FLORIDA

KAWA ORTHODONTICS LLP, a Florida 

limited liability partnership, individually 

and as the representative of a class of 

similarly-situated persons,

Plaintiff,

v.

MEDXCOM LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company, and GIFFEN 

SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware 

corporation,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 

 Civil Action No: 2:20-cv-80985

 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff, KAWA ORTHODONTICS LLP,

through its undersigned attorneys, hereby voluntarily dismisses this action with prejudice, class 

allegations without prejudice, each side to bear its own costs. 

 Respectfully submitted,

KAWA ORTHODONTICS LLP

By: s/ Ryan M. Kelly

 Ryan M. Kelly – FL Bar. 90110

ANDERSON + WANCA

3701 Algonquin Rd., Ste. 500

Rolling Meadows. IL 60008

Telephone: 847-368-1500

Fax: 847-368-1501 

rkelly@andersonwanca.com

Case 9:20-cv-80985-WPD Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/03/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 3, 2020, I electronically filed the notice of Voluntary Dismissal 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filings 

to all counsel of record.

/s/ Ryan M. Kelly

 

Case 9:20-cv-80985-WPD Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/03/2020 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23061]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Telecommunications and Information Administration


Announcement of Performance Review Board Members

AGENCY: National Telecommunications and Information Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: 5 CFR 430.310 requires agencies to publish notice of 
Performance Review Board appointees in the Federal Register before 
their service begins. This notice announces the names of new and 
existing members of the National Telecommunications and Information 
Administration's Performance Review Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darlene Haywood, International Trade 
Administration, Office of Human Resources Management, at (202) 482-
2850, Room 7060, Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Performance Review Board 
is to review and make recommendations to the appointing authority on 
performance management issues such as appraisals, bonuses, pay level 
increases, and Presidential Rank Awards for members of the Senior 
Executive Service.
    The Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, Michael 
D. Gallagher, has named the following members of the National 
Telecommunications and Information Performance Review Board:
    1. Frederick R. Wentland, Associate Administrator for Spectrum 
Management (Chairperson).
    2. Bernadette McGuirre-Rivera, Associate Administrator for 
Telecommunications and Information Applications.
    3. Alan W. Vincent, Associate Administrator for Telecommunication 
Sciences and Director, Institute for Telecommunications Sciences.
    4. Robin R. Layton, Associate Administrator for International 
Affairs.
    5. Michael J. Crison, Director, Requirements, Planning and Systems 
Integration Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association 
(outside reviewer).
    6. Darlene F. Haywood, Executive Secretary, ITA Office of Human 
Resources Management at (202) 482-2850.

    Dated: October 7, 2004.
Doris W. Brown,
Human Resources Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-23061 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-25-P
§ 9185.3-2 Showing required. ( a ) *Necessity.* The applicants for the resurvey of any township are required to present satisfactory prima facie evidence of the necessity for such action, based either upon general obliteration of evidences of the original survey or upon conditions so grossly defective as to preclude the possibility of a reasonably certain identification of the subdivisions of the subsisting survey or a satisfactory local restoration thereof.
( b ) *Condition of original survey.* Applications for the resurvey of each township must be supported by evidence in the form of a statement, preferably from the county or other competent surveyor, showing in detail that the evidences of the original survey have been obliterated to such an extent as to make it impracticable to apply the suggestions of the circular issued by the Bureau of Land Management for the necessary restoration of the lines and corners in the proper identification of the legal subdivisions occupied by the present or prospective entrymen or that the obliteration of the original monuments has become so advanced that the land boundaries can be identified only through extensive retracements by experienced engineers of the Bureau of Land Management.
PUBLIC LAW 110–224—MAY 7, 2008 122 STAT. 737 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5400 (S. 2626): 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Mar. 5, considered and passed House. 

Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–224 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 160 East 

Washington Street in Chagrin Falls, Ohio, as the ‘‘Sgt. Michael M. Kashkoush 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SGT. MICHAEL M. KASHKOUSH POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 160 East Washington Street in Chagrin Falls, 

Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sgt. Michael M. 

Kashkoush Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sgt. Michael M. Kashkoush Post Office Building’’. 

Approved May 7, 2008. 

May 7, 2008 

[H.R. 5400] 


jbridges on POFP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS