alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Esther Ehrlich, as Administratrix of the Estate of Maurice A. Ehrlich, Deceased, Respondent, v. George Hollingshead, Appellant. George Hollingshead, Appellant, v. Esther Ehrlich, as Administratrix of the Estate of Maurice A. Ehrlich, Deceased, Respondent.

*743Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionRelated InformationOptions to Revise Radiation Protection Regulations

# Contact Us About Options to Revise Radiation Protection Regulations and Guidance

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) welcomes your comments and questions about Options to Revise Radiation Protection Regulations and Guidance to achieve greater alignment with the 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP Publication 103). We are particularly interested in your views regarding potential conflicts and any benefits or unintended consequences that may result from drafting and implementing any related changes to the NRC's existing regulations See our FAQ page for answers to many frequently asked questions. In addition, the NRC's Synopsis of ICRP Publication 103, which is available through the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), discusses the broad implications of the new recommendations. If you still have questions or comments, please send us an email message by completing this form.

If you need to report a safety concern, please do not use this page. Instead, please see Report a Safety or Security Concern.

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Public Involvement
          - Frequently Asked Questions
          - Division 1, 4, and 8 Regulatory Guides Potentially Subject to Update
          - Supporting Guidance and Computer Codes Potentially Subject to Update
          - Contact Us

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020
### [§806. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §13512(a), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2142]

Section, added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title II, §211(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 724; amended Pub. L. 99–514, title X, §1011(a), (b)(5)–(8), (11)(A), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2388, 2389, related to small life insurance company deduction.

A prior section 806, added Pub. L. 86–69, §2(a), June 25, 1959, 73 Stat. 120; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834, related to certain changes in reserves and assets, prior to the general revision of this part by Pub. L. 98–369, §211(a).

Another prior section 806, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 258, related to adjustment for certain reserves, prior to the general revision of this part by act Mar. 13, 1956, ch. 83, §2, 70 Stat. 36.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, see section 13512(c) of Pub. L. 115–97, set out as an Effective Date of 2017 Amendment note under section 453B of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Peter Traversone, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe Helicopter Antenna Radiation Prediction Code (HARP)The first nine months effort in the development of a user oriented computer code, referred to as the HARP code, for analyzing the radiation from helicopter antennas is described. The HARP code uses modern computer graphics to aid in the description and display of the helicopter geometry. At low frequencies the helicopter is modeled by polygonal plates, and the method of moments is used to compute the desired patterns. At high frequencies the helicopter is modeled by a composite ellipsoid and flat plates, and computations are made using the geometrical theory of diffraction. The HARP code will provide a user friendly interface, employing modern computer graphics, to aid the user to describe the helicopter geometry, select the method of computation, construct the desired high or low frequency model, and display the results.Document ID19900018630Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsKlevenow, F. T.*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)*Lynch, B. G.*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)*Newman, E. H.*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)*Rojas, R. G.*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)*Scheick, J. T.*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)*Shamansky, H. T.*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)*Sze, K. Y.*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1990Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186925FR-722792-1NAS 1.26:186925Accession Number90N27946Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-1058Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900018630.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22808]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-960-1430-BJ ES-052327, Group No. 25, Mississippi]


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plat of survey; Mississippi.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs.
    The lands we surveyed are:

Choctaw Meridian, Mississippi

T. 12 N., R. 13 E.

    The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a portion 
of the east boundary, a portion of the subdivisional lines, the survey 
of the subdivision of section 12 and the metes and bounds survey of the 
Choctaw Indian Reservation boundary in section 12 in Township 12 North, 
Range 13 East, Choctaw Meridian, Mississippi, and was accepted on 
August 19, 2004.
    We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It 
will be made available to the public as a matter of information.

    Date: August 19, 2004.
Stephen D. Douglas,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 04-22808 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
No: 23-066 October 16, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Announces Hearing Opportunity for Summer Subsequent License Renewal

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced an opportunity to request a hearing on 

the application to renew for a second time the operating license of the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear 

Station in Jenkinsville, South Carolina. 

The hearing opportunity was announced today in the Federal Register. The notice 

includes instructions for filing petitions to intervene by Dec. 15. 

Dominion Energy South Carolina submitted an application in August seeking to renew 

the license for an additional 20 years of operation. The application, if approved, would extend 

Summer’s license to operate for up to 80 years. The NRC approved the first renewal in 2004, 

extending the licensing term from 40 to 60 years, through Aug. 6, 2042. 

The NRC staff has officially docketed the application and begun its detailed safety and 

environmental reviews. The staff’s goal is to complete the application review in 22 months, 

providing Summer addresses information requests in a timely manner. 

The Summer subsequent license renewal application is available on the NRC website and 

will be available at the Fairfield County Library, 300 West Washington St., in Winnsboro, 

South Carolina.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund VI, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of
one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|                          
|/S/    LEO F. WELLS,
III  
|Leo F. Wells, III         
|Chief Executive Officer   
|May 11, 2006              
|                          
|/S/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMS
|Douglas P. Williams       
|Chief Financial Officer   
|May 11, 2006
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Vanderbilt Mansion
National Historic Site
New York


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Education
 National Parks are America's largest classrooms. We offer several options for educators, from ranger guided house tours to distance learning and clasroom materials. Help your students explore the parks with a field trip or by diving into curriculum with our Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math programming. The lessons are tied to Next Gen standards and gives the students opportunities to explore in their way within the framework. We also can help come into your classroom virtually, with lessons offered asynchronously or in real-time. Reservations must be made at least 2 weeks in advance. Contact Mike Autenrieth by emailor by telephone at 845-444-9167 for more information or to make your reservation.

Field Trips
Show1040 per page
Loading results...

Lesson Plans
Show1040 per page
Loading results...
 Last updated: June 5, 2023
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 4097 Albany Post Road
Hyde Park,
NY
12538
 Phone: 845 229-7770 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.956 Suspension or revocation of brokers and dealers.

The appropriate Office of Capital Access official in accordance with Delegations of Authority may suspend or revoke the privilege of any broker or dealer to participate in the sale or marketing of Debentures and Certificates for actions or conduct bearing negatively on the broker's fitness to participate in the securities market. SBA must give the broker or dealer written notice, stating the reasons, at least 10 business days prior to the effective date of the suspension or revocation. A broker or dealer may appeal the suspension or revocation made under this section pursuant to the procedures set forth in part 134 of this chapter. The action of this official will remain in effect pending resolution of the appeal.

[73 FR 75519, Dec. 11, 2008]
PUBLIC LAW 109–36—JULY 21, 2005 119 STAT. 393

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1001:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Apr. 20, considered and passed House.

June 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–36

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 301 South

Heatherwilde Boulevard in Pflugerville, Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant Byron W. Norwood

Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

301 South Heatherwilde Boulevard in Pflugerville, Texas, shall

be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Byron W. Norwood

Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant

Byron W. Norwood Post Office Building’’.

Approved July 21, 2005.

July 21, 2005

[H.R. 1001]
2008 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-29-2008

Egolf v. Witmer

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 06-2193

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Egolf v. Witmer" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 1085.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/1085
*Honorable David R. Hansen, Senior Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit Court of

Appeals, sitting by designation.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-2193

___________

TRISTAN P. EGOLF; ADAM CLAYTON WILLARD;

JONATHAN A. KOHLER; DAVID JC OBRYANT;

BENJAMIN D. KEELY; PAULA EGOLF; 

GARY LEE EGOLF,

 Appellants

v.

CHRISTOPHER WITMER; JAMES ELY; DEB KOLB;

GERALD KLING; D.J. KLING, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL

CAPACITIES AS POLICE OFFICERS FOR EAST LAMPETER TOWNSHIP; LINDA

GEROW; BLAINE HERTZOG; WAYNE KLINE; JOHN/JANE DOE 1 TO 5 IN THEIR

INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES WHO ARE UNKNOWN STATE ACTORS; JOHN/JANE

DOE 6 TO 10 IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES WHO ARE UNKNOWN

FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR ACTORS; CHRISTOPHER JONES, IN

THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES AS POLICE OFFICERS FOR EAST LAMPETER

TOWNSHIP; MARIAN ADAMS, in their individual capacities as Pennsylvania

State Troopers; and; EAST LAMPETER TOWNSHIP

_____

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. No. 04-cv-05695)

District Judge: The Honorable Paul S. Diamond

___________

ARGUED APRIL 10, 2007

Before: SMITH, NYGAARD, and HANSEN,*

 Circuit Judges.

(Opinion Filed May 22, 2008)
2

 

ORDER AMENDING CONCURRING OPINION

 

AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2008, it appearing that there is a spelling error

on page 45 of the concurring opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that the concurring opinion is amended on page 45, line 5, of the slip

opinion available on the website of this court, changing the word “beared” to “bared.”

By the Court,

 /s/ D. Brooks Smith 

Circuit Judge

DATED: May 29, 2008
GREAT AMERICAN FINANCIAL RESOURCES, INC.



EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002









In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Great American Financial Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













|/s/S. Craig LindnerS. Craig Lindner
Chief Executive Officer | /s/Christopher P. MilianoChristopher P. Miliano
Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



May 7, 2004



A signed original of this written statement will be retained by the Registrant

and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §2361. Process and procedure

In any civil action of interpleader or in the nature of interpleader under section 1335 of this title, a district court may issue its process for all claimants and enter its order restraining them from instituting or prosecuting any proceeding in any State or United States court affecting the property, instrument or obligation involved in the interpleader action until further order of the court. Such process and order shall be returnable at such time as the court or judge thereof directs, and shall be addressed to and served by the United States marshals for the respective districts where the claimants reside or may be found.

Such district court shall hear and determine the case, and may discharge the plaintiff from further liability, make the injunction permanent, and make all appropriate orders to enforce its judgment.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 970; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §117, 63 Stat. 105.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### 1948 Act

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(26) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 26, as added Jan. 20, 1936, ch. 13, §1, 49 Stat. 1096).

Jurisdiction and venue provisions of section 41(26) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., appear in sections 1335 and 1397 of this title.

Subsection (e) of section 41(26) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to defense in nature of interpleader and joinder of additional parties, was omitted as unnecessary, such matters being governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Words, "Notwithstanding any provision of part I of this title to the contrary" were omitted as unnecessary, since the revised title contains no "contrary provisions."

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### 1949 Act

This section makes clear that section 2361 of title 28, U.S.C., applies only to statutory actions and not to general equity interpleader suits in which the jurisdictional amount and diversity of citizenship requirements are the same as in other diversity cases.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1949—Act May 24, 1949, substituted "In any civil action of interpleader or in the nature of interpleader under section 1335 under this title" for "In any interpleader action,", and inserted "or prosecuting" between "instituting" and "any proceeding".
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Technical Assistance Request, Use of Portable Shields for a High Dose Rate Afterloader Facility at Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C.

## HPPOS-317 PDR-9306280268

See the memorandum from J. E. Glenn to R. R. Bellamy dated June 25, 1992. 

This NMSS memo responds to a technical assistance request from Region I, dated March 26, 1992, concerning Washington Hospital Center's request to relocate their high dose rate afterloader to a new location and use portable lead shadow shields to obtain compliance with the dose limits of 10 CFR 20.1301 for members of the public. The request was reviewed and the following guidance is given.

Although NRC's Policy and Guidance Directive, FC 86-4, for licensing high dose rate afterloaders presumes the necessary room shielding is obtained by the use of appropriate fixed wall, floor, and ceiling materials, it does not explicitly require it. However, portable shield should not be permitted as a permanent means of providing shielding for high dose rate afterloading facilities. This requirement is consistent with the recommendations contained in the most recent draft of the AAPM Task Group on Remote Afterloading Systems.

Washington Hospital Center may be allowed to use the portable shields on a temporary or emergency basis to insure patient care is not impacted. If portable shield are used, a positive method of ensuring the shield (s) are correctly positioned for each treatment must be provided, and "per patient" surveys must be performed for each treatment to insure that exposure rates in unrestricted areas comply with 10 CFR 20. The licensee would be expected to commit to the installation of appropriate permanent shielding within a reasonable period of time. The hospital must be made aware that the use of a cantilevered shield for limiting the exposure to the adjacent uncontrolled area above the treatment room may raise additional safety concerns about patient injury from improper design, maintenance, or mishandling during positioning of the shield.

After review of the technical assistance request, the licensee apparently omitted any description of the area security for the treatment room. Such a description is required by V (c) of FC 86-4. Since the licensee is proposing to locate the high dose rate afterloader with an existing superficial treatment machine, it is essential that they implement and describe a means of assuring that only one of the two radiation producing devices can be operated at a time. Also, the proposed shadow shield for the door and window would appear to obscure observation of the patient during treatment. If this is the case, the licensee must provide an alternate means of viewing the patient during treatment.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 20.1301, 10 CFR 20.1302

**Subject codes:** 4.4, 5.3, 7.1, 12.8

**Applicability:** Byproduct Material

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017