alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

# AGENCY:

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has determined that the proceeds that can be realized from the liquidation of assets of the receivership listed in                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         are insufficient to wholly satisfy the priority claims of depositors against the receivership estate. Therefore, upon satisfaction of secured claims, depositor claims, and claims which have priority over depositors under applicable law, no amount will remain or will be recovered sufficient to allow a dividend, distribution, or payment to any creditor of lesser priority, including but not limited to claims of general creditors. Any such claims are hereby determined to be worthless.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas Bolt, Counsel, Legal Division, FDIC, 550 17th Street, NW., Room H-11052, Washington, DC 20429. Telephone: (202) 736-0168. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Financial Institution in Receivership Determined To Have Insufficient Assets To Satisfy All Claims, FIN 4657, Am Trade International Bank of Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia.

Dated: October 7, 2004.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

Robert E. Feldman, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-22913 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
### §802. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–281, §1(b)(1), May 15, 1978, 92 Stat. 246

Section, act Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 843, §12, 70 Stat. 895, provided for nonabrogation by termination of supervision of any valid lease, permit, license. etc.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime LOYA-BONILLA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-51062.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 13, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Philip J. Lynch, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jaime Loya-Bonilla appeals his sentence for one count of aiding and abetting the possession with intent to distribute less *925than 50 kilograms of marijuana. Loya-Bonilla argues that the district court clearly erred in denying him a minor role adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2.

Section 3B1.2 provides for a two-point reduction in the offense level if the defendant was a minor participant. *See*§ 3B1.2. A “minor participant” is defined as one who is substantially “less culpable than most other participants, but whose role could not be described as minimal.” *See*§ 3B1.2, comment, (n.5). As Loya-Bonilla was responsible for recruiting the supplier of the marijuana and transporting it into the United States, his role in the offense cannot be said to have been “peripheral to the advancement of the illicit activity.” *See United States v. Thomas,*932 F.2d 1085, 1092 (5th Cir.1991). Accordingly, the district court did not clearly err in refusing to adjust Loya-Bonilla’s offense level under § 3B1.2. *See United States v. Villanueva, 408*F.3d 193, 203 *&*n. 9 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 268, 163 L.Ed.2d 241 (2005).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 212

**Question 212:** A licensee makes a prospective determination that adult workers in Department W are not likely to receive doses in excess of 10% of the limits from external sources, so external dosimetry is not required by 20.1502. The workers in Department W complain when their TLD badges are taken away, so the licensee decides to leave them badged, but not to demonstrate compliance with the occupational dose limits of the revised Part 20.
> 
(a) If an inspector finds the TLD badges being worn incorrectly or misused by Department W workers, can the licensee be cited?

(b) Must the doses be reported to the workers? If recording is required, must it be kept on Form 5?

**Answer:**
> 
(a) No citation against 10 CFR 20.1502 would be issued, provided the licensee can provide documentation that adequately supports the evaluation that monitoring of external dose is not needed. An inspector may bring the issue of incorrect wearing of dosimeters to the attention of the licensee, and may document this lack of good practice in the inspection report.

(b) No, reporting is not required. If the badges are not used for compliance with the regulations, the licensee is not required to record the results on NRC Form 5 or its equivalent. 

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1502, 10 CFR 20.2106)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 24, 2017
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Inspection Guidance on 10 CFR 50.72, "Immediate Notification Requirement for Operating Power Reactors"

## HPPOS-065 PDR-9111210251

See the memorandum from L. J. Cunningham to L. R. Greger dated November 15, 1983. This memo states that for reporting radioactive releases to unrestricted areas: (1) the annual average meteorological data should be used for determining offsite concentrations, and (2) the expanded definition of unrestricted area in NUREG-0133 should be used.

Clarification was requested on several aspects of the 10 CFR 50.72 notification requirements. These questions related to the requirement that licensees call in notification of radioactive releases that exceed the specified concentrations. Specifically, the questions were: (1) what meteorological data should be used in determining offsite concentrations e.g., annual average, real time or worst case), and (2) what location should be used (e.g., unrestricted area as defined by Part 20 or the expanded definition as specified in NUREG-0133).

In addition, it was noted that revised 10 CFR 50.72 was incorporated into 10 CFR by Supplement No. 12 issued on September 20, 1983, although the rule change was not effective until January 1, 1984. It was noted also that a currently effective version was not in 10 CFR.

Inspection guidance for operating nuclear power reactors concerning 10 CFR 50.72 are as follows:
        - Annual average meteorological data should be used for determining offsite airborne concentrations of radioactivity. This is to maintain consistency with the Technical Specifications.
        - The expanded definition of an unrestricted area as specified in NUREG-0133 should be used. This is to maintain consistency with the Technical Specifications.
        - The lack of a currently effective version of 50.72 in the 10 CFR loose-leaf version is an administrative problem only. Licensees and inspectors should keep the old pages for reference until January 1, 1984.

The old version is still the effective rule until January and deviation from those requirements in favor of the new requirements would be a technical violation. However, in such a case, notation in the inspection report without further enforcement action would be the appropriate approach.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 50.72, NUREG-0133

**Subject codes:** 2.3, 4.4, 7.5

**Applicability:** Reactors

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, October 13, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 20-22635-CV-MARTINEZ

MARIO DYRELL GODHIGH,

Petitioner,

v.

LAKE CORRECTIONAL,

Respondent.

___________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THE MATTER was referred to the Honorable Lisette M. Reid, United States Magistrate 

Judge, for a Report and Recommendation on Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (DE 2). Magistrate Judge Reid filed a Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”) recommending that the Petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as successive. (DE 

6). Judge Reid further observed that Petitioner is a three-striker under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and 

failed to file the required filing fee, inasmuch as the Petition attempts to assert a § 1983 claim. The 

Court having carefully reviewed the R&R and the record in this case de novo, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that United States Magistrate Judge Reid’s Report and 

Recommendation (DE 6) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. The Petition is DISMISSED. No 

certificate of appealability shall issue. The Clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED and DENY

pending motions as moot. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 6th day of October, 2020.

____________________________________

JOSE E. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-22635-JEM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2020 Page 1 of 1
- Skip to Primary Navigation
    - Skip to Main Content
    - Skip to Footer

        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   

      -  Water & Power          - Dams
        - Powerplants
        - Projects
        - Agrimet/Hydromet
        - Water Operations 
      -  Resources & Research          - Programs
        - Technical Service Center
        - Research & Development
        - Reclamation Manual
        - Reclamation Information Sharing Environment (RISE)
        - Environmental Resources/Reports
        - Library 
      -  About Us          - Mission
        - Fact Sheet
        - Commissioner
        - Addresses/Contacts
        - Organizational Chart
        - Leadership Bios
        - Employment
        - Contact 
      -  Recreation & Public Use          - Find Recreation
        - Recreation.gov
        - Public Use 
      -  News & Multimedia          - News Releases
        - News Stories
        - Speeches
        - Congressional Testimony
        - Fact Sheets
        - Photos
        - Multimedia
        - Social Media 

# California-Great Basin

Welcome to the Bureau of Reclamation California-Great Basin

            - Reclamation
            - California-Great Basin
            - CVP
            - Ratesetting
            - CVP Annual Ratebooks & Schedules
            - CVP Ratebooks - Irrigation, 2022

Region 10              - Region 10 Home
              - About Us
              - Area Offices
              - Central Valley Project (CVP)                  - About the CVP
                - Water Info Links
                - Ratesetting
                - Projects/Activities
                - Consultation on the Coordinated Long-Term Operation          of the CVP and SWP
                - Laws/Regs/Links
                - Financial Information 
                - Long-Term Water Transfer Program
                - Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) 
              - Programs & Activities
              - Projects & Facilities
              - Doing Business with Reclamation
              - Public Affairs 
              - Employment
              - Recreation
              - Site Index
              - Contact Us

## CVP Ratebooks - Irrigation, 2022

*Note:  Documents in Portable Document Format (PDF) require Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher to view, download Adobe Acrobat Reader*
*Last Updated: 3/11/22*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

            - Contact Us
            - Site Index
            - Accessibility
            - Disclaimer
            - DOI
            - FOIA
            - No Fear Act
            - Notices
            - Privacy Policy
            - Quality of Information
            - Recreation.gov
            - USA.gov
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22942]



[[Page 60841]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1353]


Grant of Authority; Establishment of a Foreign-Trade Zone 
Southaven (Desoto County), MS

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
adopts the following Order.
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ``* * * the 
establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Northern Mississippi FTZ Inc., a Mississippi non-
profit corporation (the Grantee), has made application to the Board 
(FTZ Docket 10-2004, filed 3/16/04), requesting the establishment of a 
foreign-trade zone in Southaven (DeSoto County), Mississippi, within 
the Memphis, Tennessee, Customs port of entry;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (69 FR 13811, 3/24/04); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants to the Grantee the 
privilege of establishing a foreign-trade zone, designated on the 
records of the Board as Foreign-Trade Zone No. 262, at the site 
described in the application, subject to the Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day of October 2004.

Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Donald L. Evans,
Secretary of Commerce, Chairman and Executive Officer.
    Attest: Dennis Puccinelli, Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-22942 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Anne MacL. Skannel, Appellant, v. James A. Skannel, Respondent.

In our opinion, the denial of alimony *pendente lite*was an improvident exercise of discretion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Mac-Crate, JJ., concur.
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 56 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2003 Page 1 of 1
§ 147.230 How and when must I identify workplaces? ( a ) You must identify all known workplaces under each SBA award. A failure to do so is a violation of your drug-free workplace requirements. You may identify the workplaces— ( 1 ) To the SBA official that is making the award, either at the time of application or upon award; or
( 2 ) In documents that you keep on file in your offices during the performance of the award, in which case you must make the information available for inspection upon request by SBA officials or their designated representatives.
( b ) Your workplace identification for an award must include the actual address of buildings (or parts of buildings) or other sites where work under the award takes place. Categorical descriptions may be used (e.g., all vehicles of a mass transit authority or State highway department while in operation, State employees in each local unemployment office, performers in concert halls or radio studios).
( c ) If you identified workplaces to the SBA awarding official at the time of application or award, as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and any workplace that you identified changes during the performance of the award, you must inform the SBA awarding official.
§ 8360.0-5 Definitions. As used in this part, the term: ( a ) *Authorized officer* means any employee of the Bureau of Land Management who has been delegated the authority to perform the duties described in this part.
( b ) *Campfire* means a controlled fire occurring out of doors, used for cooking, branding, personal warmth, lighting, ceremonial or aesthetic purposes.
( c ) *Developed recreation sites and areas* means sites and areas that contain structures or capital improvements primarily used by the public for recreation purposes. Such sites or areas may include such features as: Delineated spaces for parking, camping or boat launching; sanitary facilities; potable water; grills or fire rings; tables; or controlled access.
( d ) *Public lands* means any lands and interests in lands owned by the United States and administered by the Secretary of the Interior through the Bureau of Land Management without regard to how the United States acquired ownership.
( e ) *Vehicle* means any motorized transportation conveyance designed and licensed for use on roadways, such as an automobile, bus, or truck, and any motorized conveyance originally equipped with safety belts.
[48 FR 36384, Aug. 10, 1983, as amended at 57 FR 61243, Dec. 23, 1992; 75 FR 27455, May 17, 2010]
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.861 Job creation or retention.

A Project must create or retain one Job Opportunity per an amount of 504 loan funding that will be specified by SBA from time to time in a Federal Register notice. Such Job Opportunity average remains in effect until changed by subsequent Federal Register publication.

[68 FR 57987, Oct. 7, 2003]
### §1694. Patent infringement action

In a patent infringement action commenced in a district where the defendant is not a resident but has a regular and established place of business, service of process, summons or subpoena upon such defendant may be made upon his agent or agents conducting such business.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 945.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §109 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §48, 36 Stat. 1100).

Venue provisions of section 109 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., appear in section 1400 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.
No. 13,011.

#### State of Colorado ex rel. Danceland Amusement Company *v.*Milliken, Manager of Safety.

(14 P. [2d] 1119)

Decided October 3, 1932.

Mr. Thomas PI. Gtbson, Mr. Clarence R. Anderson, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. James D. Parriott, Mr. Robert J. Kirschwing, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed en banc without written opinion.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse REYES, also known as MDKDeath, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40737.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 27, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H Michael Sokolow, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*362Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jesse Reyes pleaded guilty to one charge of distribution of child pornography and was sentenced to serve 121 months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. Reyes now challenges two conditions of supervised release imposed by the district court. Reyes first argues that the district court erred in ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release and that this condition should be vacated. We dismiss this claim for lack of jurisdiction because it is not ripe for review. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir.2005).

Reyes also contends that the district court erred in imposing a condition of supervised release that forbids him from accessing the Internet, save for employment purposes that are approved by his probation officer. This argument is reviewed for plain error only due to Reyes’s failure to raise an appropriate objection in the district court. *See United States v. Phipps,*319 F.3d 177, 192 (5th Cir.2003). Reyes relies primarily on law from other circuits, and his attempt to distinguish a substantially similar Fifth Circuit case is unpersuasive. *See United States v. Paul,*274 F.3d 155, 169-70 (5th Cir.2001) (upholding a total prohibition on computer or Internet usage as a condition of the defendant’s supervised release). Consequently, he has failed to demonstrate any clear or obvious error on the district court’s part. *See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d 728, 732-33 (5th Cir.2005), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 267, 163 L.Ed.2d 240 (2005). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 147

**Question 147:** 10 CFR 20.1501 (b) requires the licensee to ensure that instruments and equipment used for quantitative radiation measurements are calibrated periodically; however, there is no corresponding requirement in old Part 20. Does this new requirement mean that the accuracy and frequency of such calibrations that have been found acceptable by the NRC in the past will not be acceptable under the revised Part 20?

**Answer:** No. The acceptability of calibration frequency and accuracy is not changed by the inclusion of §§20.1501 (b) in the revised Part 20.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1501 (b))

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, November 07, 2017
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 220

**Question 220:** 10 CFR 20.1602 gives requirements for control for access to very high radiation areas, and has no exemption clause. 10 CFR 20.1003 defines a very high radiation area.
> 
(a) Are teletherapy rooms or fixed / field radiography facilities, with beams that can deliver in excess of 500 rad in 1 hour at 1 meter, very high radiation areas?

(b) Do the requirements in 20.1602 apply to teletherapy rooms or fixed / field radiography facilities?

**Answer:**
> 
(a) Yes.

(b) Yes. However, this does not prohibit patients from receiving prescribed medical treatment in a teletherapy room.

(Reference:10 CFR 20.1602, 10 CFR 20.1003)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 24, 2017
#### Leo Smith, Respondent, et al., Plaintiffs, v. General Schuyler Fire Insurance Company et al., Appellants.

Present — Crosbjr, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.; McCurn, J., not voting.