alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department of TransportationFederal Highway Administration        1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC 20590        202-366-4000

----

        - About
        - Programs
        - Resources
        - Briefing Room
        - Contact
        - Search FHWA

# Federal-aid Program Administration

    - Contract Administration
    - Federal-aid Programs and Special Funding
    - Local Public Agency
    - Preconstruction
    - Stewardship/Oversight
    -  

HomeProgramsFederal-aid Program Administration

## ARCHIVED: Price Trends for Federal-Aid Highway Construction

The National Highway Construction Cost Index  (NHCCI) is intended as a price index that can be used both to track pure price-changes associated with highway construction costs and to convert current-dollar expenditures on highway construction to real- or constant-dollar expenditures. The NHCCI is intended to replace the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Bid-Price Index (BPI) in the future, but also to be compared with the BPI for historical purposes. This report presents a description of the research into developing a new price index using Oman Systems, Inc. (OSI) Bid-Tabs data and the methodology used to produce the NHCCI on a quarterly basis. A companion document describes the mathematics of the indexing used in NHCCI. The conclusion is that a Fisher Index based on the OSI Bid-Tabs data gives results that are both representative of construction costs as a whole and are consistent with related price indexes, such as the PPI for Highway and Street Construction and the historical BPI.

### More Information  

        - National Highway Construction Cost Index (NHCCI)

### Contact

        -  David Bartz   Office of Stewardship, Oversight and Management  	512-417-5191   E-mail David  

Privacy PolicyFreedom of Information Act (FOIA)AccessibilityWeb Policies & NoticesNo Fear ActReport Waste, Fraud and AbuseU.S. DOT HomeUSA.govWhiteHouse.gov

Federal Highway Administration
# MIK E BRYANTO N INGHA M COUNT

Y CLER K MAI N OFFIC E .<«EnB ^ BRANC H OFFIC E P.O . Bo x17 9 /^jT m 1^'Floo r Courthous e l^^^'i^l l 31 3 W . Kalamazo o Mason , M l 4885 4 iE^M ' Lansing , M l 4893 3 Phone:(517)676-720 1 ^SS ^ Phone:(517)483-642 5 Fax : (517)676-725 4 -^JESi- ' Pg^ . (517)493.542 1 Fin d u s o n th e we b at : www.inaham.orQ/cl/clindex.ht m February 16 , 201 2

Th e Honorabl e Raymon dL . Lahoo d.,. , -ij'crj'^i Secretary o f

Transportatio n -~^^, — Untie dState s Departmen t o f Transportatio n " '•

- 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e S E jr. , Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Su n Countr y Slo t

Exemptio n Docke t

No . FAA-2012-008 9 Dea r Secretar y Lahood : I Mik e Bryanton , Ingha mCount y Clerk , lif e lon g residen t

o f th e Mid-Michiga n area , a m intereste di n th e developmen t o f th e stronges t

possibl e ai r

servic e i n ou r

region . T o that

end , 1 writ e thi s lette r

t o 'suppor

t Su n Countr y Airline s year-roun dservic e fromLansin g t o Ronal d Reaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airport . Th e route , adde dlas t

year , connect s th e state' s capita l city with th e nation' s capital . In additio n to stat e government , i t

ease s trave l for

Michiga n Stat e University , numerou s stat e association s an dbusinesse s with tie s t o Washington , D.C . It' s avaluabl e rout e fo r th e region' s economy ; official s say som e 48,00 0 passenger s hav e use di t sinc e las t April . Thi s non-sto p servic e to Washingto n D C ha s prove n t o b e popular with th e Su n Countr y airline s experiencin g a15 6 percen t increas e i n dail y passenger s i n th e thir dquarte r o f 201 1 ove r

th e number s from ayea

r earlier . Bu t servic e i s i n jeopard y becaus e afederal court rule dthat

th e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n was wron g t o giv e Su n Countr y th e slot s a t Reaga n National . Th e U.S . Court o f Appeal s rule dthat

DO T ha dbroke n apreceden t o f allowin g slo t

transfer s a s part

o f acquisition s o r mergers . Th e court

sai dRepubli c Airway s Holding s Inc . shoul dhav e retaine dth e slo t a s part o f it s acquisitio n o f

Midwes t Airline s Inc . Su n Country shoul db e hel dharmless . Th e airlin e isn' t responsibl e fo

r th e error . I

t investe di n aircraf t an dstaf f for year-roun dservic e to Washington , D.C , fromCapita l Regio n Internationa l Airport .DO T ha s amean s t o allo w Su n Countr y fly , eve n i f i t return s aslo t

t o Republic . It

ca n authoriz e slot s unde r

a n exemptio n rule . Su n Countr y ha s appeale dt o reques t jus t that . A n exemptio n wil l not

adversel y affec t

safety , sinc e th e airlin e ha s provide dsaf e servic e o n th e rout e sinc e las t

April . Wit h al l o f thi s i n mind , I woul dgreatl y appreciat e you r grantin g approva l o f

th e retentio n o f landin g right s an dslo t

exemptions . Sincerely , Mik e Bryanto n InghamCounty Cler

k
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,227
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,227
<PP&E>                                     138,566,663
<DEPRECIATION>                              83,071,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,496,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,139
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  55,341,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,496,818
<SALES>                                      8,460,122
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,489,923
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  389,835
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,100,088
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,100,088
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:20-cv-22467-KMW

DOUG LONGHINI, 

Plaintiff,

v.

2712 NW 95TH STREET, LLC, and

YNDI FOOD INC.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, DOUG LONGHINI, and Defendant, 2712 NW 95TH STREET, LLC, and YNDI 

FOOD INC., having entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release that resolves all claims that 

were or could have been brought in this action, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this matter with 

prejudice.

Dated: February 3, 2021.

/s/ Anthony J. Perez

ANTHONY J. PEREZ

Florida Bar No. 535451

GARCIA-MENOCAL & PEREZ, P.L.

4937 SW 74th Court, No. 3

Miami, Florida 33155

E-Mail: ajperezlaw@gmail.com;

aquezada@lawgmp.com

Telephone: (305)553-3464

Facsimile: (305) 553-3031

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/Carmen Rodriguez

CARMEN RODRIGUEZ

Florida Bar No. 710385

LAW OFFICES OF CARMEN 

RODRIGUEZ, P.A.

Palmetto Bay Centre

15715 South Dixie Highway, Suite 411

Palmetto Bay, Florida 33157-1884

E-Mail: crpa@crlaborlawfirm.com

Telephone: (305) 254-6101

Facsimile: (305) 254-6048

Attorney for Defendant

Case 1:20-cv-22467-KMW Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/03/2021 Page 1 of 1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPre-integrated structures for Space Station FreedomAn in-space construction (erectable) approach to assembling Freedom is planned but the increasing complexity of the station design along with a decrease in shuttle capability over the past several years has led to an assembly sequence that requires more resources (EVA, lift, volume) than the shuttle can provide given a fixed number of flights. One way to address these issues is to adopt a pre-integrated approach to assembling Freedom. A pre-integrated approach combines station primary structure and distributed systems into discrete sections that are assembled and checked out on the ground. The section is then launched as a single structural entity on the shuttle and attached to the orbiting station is then launched as a single structural entity on the shuttle and attached to the orbiting station with a minimum of EVA. The feasibility of a pre-integrated approach to assembling Freedon is discussed. The structural configuration, packaging, and shuttle integration of discrete pre-integrated elements for Freedom assembly are discussed. It is shown that the pre-integrated approach to assembly reduces EVA and increases shuttle margin with respect to mass, volume, and center of gravity limits when compared to the baseline Freedom assembly sequence.Document ID19910011901Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCruz, Jonathan N.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Monell, Donald W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Mutton, Philip*(Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co. Hampton, VA., United States)*Troutman, Patrick A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1991Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102780NAS 1.15:102780Accession Number91N21214Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 476-14-15-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910011901.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
39–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–221 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H. RES. 437, TO ESTABLISH THE SELECT BIPARTISAN COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE PREPARATION 

FOR AND RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 439] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 439, by a record vote of 9 to 4, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H. Res. 437, to 

establish the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina, under a closed rule. 

The rule provides one hour of debate in the House equally divided 

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Rules. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

resolution. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit which 

may not contain instructions. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The Committee is not aware of any points of order against consideration of the bill. The waiver of all points of against consideration of the bill is prophylactic in nature. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of each 

record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with 

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 118 

Date: September 14, 2005. 

Measure: H. Res. 439, Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 437) to establish the Select Bipartisan Committee 

2 

to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane 

Katrina. 

Motion by: Mrs. Slaughter. 

Summary of motion: To amend the rule to provide for consideration of H.R. 3764, introduced by Mr. Hastings of Florida, in lieu 

of H. Res. 437. 

Results: Defeated 4 to 9. 

Vote by Members: Diaz-Balart—Nay; Hastings (WA)—Nay; Sessions—Nay; Putnam—Nay; Capito—Nay; Cole—Nay; Bishop—Nay; 

Gingrey—Nay; Slaughter—Yea; McGovern—Yea; Hastings (FL)— Yea; Matsui—Yea; Dreier—Nay. 

Rules Committee record vote No. 119 

Date: September 14, 2005. 

Measure: H. Res. 439, Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 437) to establish the Select Bipartisan Committee 

to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane 

Katrina. 

Motion by: Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart. 

Summary of motion: To report the rule. 

Results: Agreed to 9 to 4. 

Vote by Members: Diaz-Balart—Yea; Hastings (WA)—Yea; Sessions—Yea; Putnam—Yea; Capito—Yea; Cole—Yea; Bishop—Yea; 

Gingrey—Yea; Slaughter—Nay; McGovern—Nay; Hastings (FL)— Nay; Matsui—Nay; Dreier—Yea. 

Æ
Team5, LLC.

16303 Waterman Drive

Van Nuys, California 91406

Tel: +1 818.925.1500

Fax: +1 818.925.1501

www.team5.rentals

March 8th, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Managment System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re. Petition To Amend FAA Exemption No. 11158 (the “Exemption”)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Team5, LLC, hereby requests approval to amend the Exemption to permit Team5 to operate additional types of 

UAS via the Approved UAS List. In addition to the Approved UAS List, we are requesting the addition of a type 

of UAS not on the list at this time. - the DJI M600.

The additional models will be operated in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption that Team5, LLC has 

been issued. 

Team5’s amended Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM) is being submitted separately pursuant 

to 14 CFR §11.35(b). Section 6 (pages 1-4) of the FOPM contains the proposed amendment. 

All UAS operations will continue to fully adhere to the conditions of the Exemption and all operations will be in 

full compliance with the terms of the Exemption.

Thank you for your consideration of our request.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at 818.925.1500

Sincerely yours,

Kevin LaRosa II

Chief Pilot and Manager of UAS Operations

Team5, LLC
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 200 (Monday, October 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23245]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Dates: Consideration will be given to all comments received by 
November 17, 2004.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Registration for Scientific and 
Technical Information Services; DD Form 1540; OMB Control Number 0704-
0264.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement.
    Number of Respondents: 7,979.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 7,979.
    Average Burden Per Response: 10 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 1,330.
    Needs and Uses: The date that the Defense Technical Information 
Center handles is controlled, either because of distribution 
limitations, or security classification. For this reason, all potential 
users are required to register for service. DoD Instruction 3200.14, 
Principles and Operational Parameters of the DoD Scientific and 
Technical Information Program, mandates the registration procedure. 
Federal Government agencies and their contractors are required to 
complete the DD Form 1540, Registration for Scientific and Technical 
Information Services. The contractor community completes a separate DD 
Form 1540 for each contract or grant, and registration is valid until 
the contract expires.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit, not-for-profit 
institutions, Federal Government, and state, local or tribal 
government.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jacqueline Zeiher.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Zeiher at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/ESCD/Information Management 
Division, 1225 South Clark Street, Suite 504, Arligntron, VA 22202-
4326.

    Dated: October 8, 2004.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-23245 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
TO: Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

FROM: Patrick Goodwin, ERG

DATE: September 30, 2015

SUBJECT: Index for Supporting Documentation for the National Scale Immediate 

Receiving Water Model [DCN SE04569]

This document serves as the index for the supporting documentation for the National 

Scale Immediate Receiving Water (IRW) Model, developed as part of the Environmental 

Assessment for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power 

Generating Point Source Category (EA Report), Document No. EPA-821-R-15-006 (DCN 

SE04527). The supporting documentation for this model includes the files listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Supporting Documentation

Attachment 

ID Document Name Brief Description

A1

Attachment 1: CBI_Final Steam EA IRW 

Model - Water Quality Module -

Comparison Database - Option A (CPP) -

DCN SE04569A1

CBI_Database used to compare the water quality 

module results between baseline and Option A. 

Generates inputs for the Water Quality Module 

Summary Table Generator. This version accounts 

for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.

A2

Attachment 2: CBI_Final Steam EA IRW 

Model - Water Quality Module -

Comparison Database - Option B (CPP) -

DCN SE04569A2

CBI_Database used to compare the water quality 

module results between baseline and Option B. 

Generates inputs for the Water Quality Module 

Summary Table Generator. This version accounts 

for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.

A3

Attachment 3: CBI_Final Steam EA IRW 

Model - Water Quality Module -

Comparison Database - Option C (CPP) -

DCN SE04569A3

CBI_Database used to compare the water quality 

module results between baseline and Option C. 

Generates inputs for the Water Quality Module 

Summary Table Generator. This version accounts 

for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.

A4

Attachment 4: CBI_Final Steam EA IRW 

Model - Water Quality Module -

Comparison Database - Option D (CPP) -

DCN SE04569A4

CBI_Database used to compare the water quality 

module results between baseline and Option D. 

Generates inputs for the Water Quality Module 

Summary Table Generator. This version accounts 

for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.

A5

Attachment 5: CBI_Final Steam EA IRW 

Model - Water Quality Module -

Comparison Database - Option E (CPP) -

DCN SE04569A5

CBI_Database used to compare the water quality 

module results between baseline and Option E. 

Generates inputs for the Water Quality Module 

Summary Table Generator. This version accounts 

for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.
#### Lillian B. Bragg, as Administratrix, etc., of George Bragg, Deceased, *915Respondent, v. Central New England Railway Company, Appellant.

Motion granted. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
#### Herbert W. Cramp, Respondent, v. Chester A. Dady and Others, Appellants, Respondents.

On two days’ notice to their opponent, let the counsel for the parties prevailing upon the appeal submit a memorandum of what findings of the trial court should be disapproved or modified in accord with the opinion handed down by this court (See 162 App. Div. 321), and also such findings, if any, which they think should be made in accord with such opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 386

**Question 386:** In evaluating whether to require the use of respirators to limit intakes, it is found that wearing a respirator will likely increase the total effective dose equivalent (TEDE). However, the workers request that they be allowed to wear respirators to limit intakes, despite the results of the evaluation. With regard to NRC regulation, what discretion may the licensee exercise in this circumstance?

**Answer:** 10 CFR 20.1702 provides for the use of respirators consistent with maintaining the TEDE as low as is reasonably achievable. Assuming that the licensee has provided appropriate training to the workers in question, the licensee may exercise discretion on a case-by-case basis in determining whether to grant approval to a worker's request for using a respirator when the TEDE-ALARA determination dictates that respiratory protection not be used. The NRC staff realizes that the significant "culture shift" / "paradigm shift" (i.e., changing from the traditional operational philosophy of not allowing any worker intakes to one of allowing some intakes when this is consistent with the goal of maintaining the TEDE ALARA) may not take place quickly. Furthermore, acceptance of this change will certainly be difficult for some individuals. Therefore, the NRC staff realizes that during this transition period licensees will need reasonable flexibility to allow for individual needs and problems in making this shift. However, the staff expects that over time the transition to ALARA-TEDE will be made and this worker acceptance problem will become an exceptional occurrence. In the meantime, when assigning a respirator to the requesting worker, the licensee should make every reasonable effort to provide the worker with a respirator that minimizes the loss of worker efficiency. Note: The NRC staff is aware of existing state OSHA regulations that require an employer to provide a worker with a respirator upon request; compliance with such state regulations is acceptable to the NRC staff. See the answer to the related Question 387.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1702, 10 CFR 20.1703)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, November 27, 2017
Case 1:20-cv-22244-JEM Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:20-cv-22244-JEM Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:20-cv-22244-JEM Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:20-cv-22244-JEM Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 4 of 4