1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

Case No. _____________________

RIGOBERTO SERRANO, and other 

similarly situated individuals,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

TWIN STONE DESIGNS AND 

INSTALLATION, INC., MAYRA 

PARENTE, and PLINIO IGNACIO

MEDINA,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

COMPLAINT

(OPT-IN PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C § 216(B))

Plaintiffs, RIGOBERTO SERRANO (“Plaintiff”) and other similarly situated individuals, 

sue the Defendants, TWIN STONE DESIGNS AND INSTALLATION, INC., MAYRA 

PARENTE and PLINIO MEDINA (collectively the “Defendants”) and allege:

JURISDICTION

1. This is an action to recover money damages for unpaid overtime wages under the 

laws of the United States. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 

U.S.C. § 201-219 (Section 216 for jurisdictional placement) (“the Act”).

VENUE

2. Plaintiff is a resident of Miami-Dade County, Florida, within the jurisdiction of this 

Honorable Court. Plaintiff is a covered employee for purposes of the Act.

Case 0:20-cv-61282-RS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 1 of 8
2

3. TWIN STONE DESIGNS AND INSTALLATION, INC. (the “Corporate 

Defendant”), MAYRA PARENTE and PLINIO MEDINA (the “Individual Defendants”), are a

Florida company and Florida residents, respectively, having their main place of business in 

Broward County, Florida, where Plaintiff worked for Defendants, and at all times material hereto 

were and are engaged in interstate commerce. The Individual Defendants, upon information and 

belief, reside in Broward County, Florida.

COUNT I: WAGE AND HOUR VIOLATION BY

THE CORPORATE DEFENDANT (UNPAID OVERTIME)

4. Plaintiff re-adopts each and every factual allegation as stated in paragraphs 1-3 

above as if set out in full herein. 

5. This action is brought by Plaintiff and those similarly situated to recover from the 

Corporate Defendant unpaid overtime compensation, as well as an additional amount as liquidated 

damages, costs, and reasonable attorneys’ fees under the provisions of 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and 

specifically under the provisions of 29 U.S.C. § 207. 29 U.S.C. § 207 (a)(1) states, “No employer 

shall employ any of his employees . . . for a work week longer than 40 hours unless such employee 

receives compensation for his employment in excess of the hours above-specified at a rate not less 

than one and a half times the regular rate at which he is employed.”

6. Jurisdiction is conferred on this Court by Title 28 U.S.C. § 1337 and by Title 29 

U.S.C. § 216(b). The Corporate Defendant is a construction company and, at all times pertinent to 

this Complaint, was engaged in interstate commerce. At all times pertinent to this Complaint, the 

Corporate Defendant operates as an organization which sells and/or markets its services and/or 

goods to customers from throughout the United States and also provides its services for goods sold 

and transported from across state lines of other states, and the Corporate Defendant obtains and 

Case 0:20-cv-61282-RS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 2 of 8
3

solicits funds from non-Florida sources, accepts funds from non-Florida sources, uses telephonic 

transmissions going over state lines to do its business, transmits funds outside the State of Florida, 

and otherwise regularly engages in interstate commerce, particularly with respect to its employees. 

Upon information and belief, the annual gross revenue of the Corporate Defendant was at all times 

material hereto in excess of $500,000 per annum, and/or Plaintiff and those similarly situated, by 

virtue of working in interstate commerce, otherwise satisfy the Act’s requirements. 

7. By reason of the foregoing, the Corporate Defendant is and was, during all times 

hereafter mentioned, an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for 

commerce as defined in §§ 3 (r) and 3(s) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 203(r) and 203(s) and/or Plaintiff 

and those similarly situated was and/or is engaged in interstate commerce for the Corporate 

Defendant. The Corporate Defendant’s business activities involve those to which the Act applies. 

The Corporate Defendant is a construction company and, through its business activity, affects 

interstate commerce. The Plaintiff’s work for the Corporate Defendant likewise affects interstate 

commerce. Plaintiff was employed by the Corporate Defendant as a construction worker for the 

Corporate Defendant’s business.

8. While employed by the Corporate Defendant, Plaintiff worked approximately an 

average of sixty (60) hours per week without being compensated at the rate of not less than oneand one-half times the regular rate at which he was employed. Plaintiff was employed as a

construction worker performing the same or similar duties as that of those other similarly situated 

construction workers whom Plaintiff observed working in excess of 40 hours per week without 

overtime compensation. 

Case 0:20-cv-61282-RS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 3 of 8
4

9. Plaintiff worked for the Corporate Defendant from approximately July of 2012 to

December of 2019. In total, Plaintiff worked approximately 130 compensable weeks under the 

Act, or 130 compensable weeks if we count 3 years back from the filing of the instant action.

10. The Corporate Defendant paid Plaintiff on average approximately $960 to $1,200

per week. 

11. However, the Corporate Defendant did not properly compensate Plaintiff for hours

that Plaintiff worked in excess of 40 per week.

12. Plaintiff seeks to recover unpaid overtime wages accumulated from the date of hire 

and/or from 3 (three) years back from the date of the filing of this Complaint.

13. Prior to the completion of discovery and to the best of Plaintiff’s knowledge, at the 

time of the filing of this Complaint, Plaintiff’s good faith estimate of unpaid overtime wages is as 

follows:

a. Actual Damages: $21,666.67

Calculation: $1,000 (average weekly pay) / 60 (average of weekly hours worked) = 

$16.66 (hourly pay) x .5 (overtime rate) x 20 (approximate number of overtime hours) 

x 130 (compensable weeks) = $21,666.67

b. Liquidated Damages: $21,666.67

c. Total Damages: $43,333 plus reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs of suit.

14. At all times material hereto, the Corporate Defendant failed to comply with Title 

29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 and 29 C.F.R. § 516.2 and § 516.4 et seq. in that Plaintiff and those similarly

situated performed services and worked in excess of the maximum hours provided by the Act but 

no provision was made by the Corporate Defendant to properly pay them at the rate of time and 

Case 0:20-cv-61282-RS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 4 of 8
5

one half for all hours worked in excess of forty hours (40) per workweek as provided in the Act. 

The additional persons who may become Plaintiffs in this action are weekly-paid employees and/or 

former employees of the Corporate Defendant who are and who were subject to the unlawful 

payroll practices and procedures of the Corporate Defendant and were not paid time and one half 

of their regular rate of pay for all overtime hours worked in excess of forty. 

15. The Corporate Defendant knew and/or showed reckless disregard of the provisions 

of the Act concerning the payment of overtime wages and remains owing Plaintiff and those 

similarly situated these overtime wages since the commencement of Plaintiff’s and those similarly

situated employees’ employment with the Corporate Defendant as set forth above, and Plaintiff 

and those similarly situated are entitled to recover double damages. The Corporate Defendant

never posted any notice, as required by Federal Law, to inform employees of their federal rights 

to overtime and minimum wage payments. 

16. The Corporate Defendant willfully and intentionally refused to pay Plaintiff 

overtime wages as required by the laws of the United States as set forth above and remains owing 

Plaintiff these overtime wages since the commencement of Plaintiff’s employment with the 

Corporate Defendant as set forth above.

17. Plaintiff has retained the law offices of the undersigned attorney to represent him 

in this action and is obligated to pay a reasonable attorneys’ fee.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and those similarly situated request that this Honorable Court: 

A. Enter judgment for Plaintiff and others similarly situated and against the Corporate 

Defendant on the basis of the Corporate Defendant’s willful violations of the Fair Labor 

Case 0:20-cv-61282-RS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 5 of 8
6

Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. and other Federal Regulations; and

B. Award Plaintiff actual damages in the amount shown to be due for unpaid wages and 

overtime compensation for hours worked in excess of forty weekly; and

C. Award Plaintiff an equal amount in double damages/liquidated damages; and

D. Award Plaintiff reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs of suit; and 

E. Grant such other and further relief as this Court deems equitable and just. 

BENCH TRIAL DEMAND

Plaintiff and those similarly situated demand trial by a Judge of all issues so triable as of 

right. 

COUNT II: WAGE AND HOUR VIOLATION BY

THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS (UNPAID OVERTIME)

18. Plaintiff re-adopts each and every factual allegation as stated in paragraphs 1-17

above as if set out in full herein.

19. At the times mentioned, the Individual Defendants were, and are now, owners and 

officers of the Corporate Defendant. The Individual Defendants were employers of Plaintiff and 

others similarly situated within the meaning of Section 3(d) of the Act [29 U.S.C. § 203(d)], in 

that these defendants acted directly or indirectly in the interests of the Corporate Defendant in 

relation to the employees of the Corporate Defendant, including Plaintiff and others similarly 

situated. The Individual Defendants had operational control of the Corporate Defendant, were

involved in the day-to-day functions of the Corporate Defendants, provided Plaintiff with his work 

schedule, and are jointly liable for Plaintiff’s damages.

Case 0:20-cv-61282-RS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 6 of 8
7

20. The Individual Defendants are and were at all times relevant persons in control of 

the Corporate Defendant’s financial affairs and can cause the Corporate Defendant to compensate 

(or not to compensate) its employees in accordance with the Act.

21. The Individual Defendants willfully and intentionally caused Plaintiff not to receive 

overtime compensation as required by the laws of the United States as set forth above and remain 

owing Plaintiff these overtime wages since the commencement of Plaintiff’s employment with the 

Corporate Defendant as set forth above. 

22. Plaintiff has retained the law offices of the undersigned attorney to represent him 

in this action and is obligated to pay a reasonable attorneys’ fee.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and those similarly situated request that this Honorable Court: 

A. Enter judgment for Plaintiff and others similarly situated and against the Individual 

Defendants on the basis of the Defendants’ willful violations of the Fair Labor 

Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. and other Federal Regulations; and

B. Award Plaintiff actual damages in the amount shown to be due for unpaid wages and 

overtime compensation for hours worked in excess of forty weekly; and

C. Award Plaintiff an equal amount in double damages/liquidated damages; and

D. Award Plaintiff reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs of suit; and 

E. Grant such other and further relief as this Court deems equitable and just. 

BENCH TRIAL DEMAND

Plaintiff and those similarly situated demand trial by a Judge of all issues so triable as of 

right. 

Case 0:20-cv-61282-RS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 7 of 8
8

Dated: June 30, 2020.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Tanesha W. Blye

Tanesha W. Blye, Esq.

 Fla. Bar No.: 738158

 Email: tblye@saenzanderson.com

Yadhira Ramirez-Toro, Esq.

Fla. Bar No.: 120506

E-mail: yramirez@saenzanderson.com

R. Martin Saenz, Esq.

Fla. Bar No.: 0640166

Email: msaenz@saenzanderson.com

SAENZ & ANDERSON, PLLC

20900 NE 30th Avenue, Ste. 800

Aventura, Florida 33180

Telephone: (305) 503-5131

Facsimile: (888) 270-5549

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 0:20-cv-61282-RS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 8 of 8