alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 412

**Question 412:** This question refers to the answer to Question 26 (b) under §20.1003. What is the basis for using a dose threshold to decide whether a person is categorized as a member of the public or as occupationally exposed? The definitions do not specify a dose threshold.

**Answer:** Question 26 (b) asked whether occupational or public dose limits apply to individuals, described in three different scenarios, who are exposed within controlled areas (outside any restricted areas) at a nuclear power plant. These scenarios described (1) a fossil plant worker, (2) a pregnant taxi driver, and (3) construction workers building a second nuclear power plant and secretaries in the administrative building. The answer to Question 26 (a) states that the public dose limits apply to the individuals in all three scenarios, but the answer also states that if turbine shine from the nuclear plant is such that fossil plant workers, construction workers, or secretaries (but not the pregnant taxi driver) ". . . are likely to exceed the dose limits for members of the public, the licensee should consider the individual doses to be occupational doses and meet the requirements for individuals who receive occupational doses."

The basis for this answer is the NRC staff's understanding of the intent of the definition of "occupational dose", specifically, that portion which states that "occupational dose means the dose received by an individual. . . in the course of employment in which the individual's assigned duties involve exposure to radiation . . . ." This understanding of the definition is also expressed in more general terms in the answer to Question 26 (a).

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1003)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
#### Ermelinda Masi, as Administratrix of the Estate of Emilio Masi, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. Aviwear Manufacturers, Ltd., et al., Defendants. Aviwear Manufacturers, Ltd., Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Matthew M. Avella et al., Copartners Doing Business as Avella Bros. Contracting Co., Third Party Defendants, and A. E. Ritchie, Third Party Defendant-Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §§61, 62. Repealed. Aug. 27, 1935, ch. 740, title I, §1, 49 Stat. 872

Section 61, act Oct. 28, 1919, ch. 85, title II, §38, 41 Stat. 319, authorized Commissioner of Internal Revenue and Attorney General of the United States to hire employees and purchase equipment and supplies necessary for enforcement to this title.

Section 62, act Oct. 28, 1919, ch. 85, title II, §39, 41 Stat. 319, authorized issuance of a summons to any person whose property rights were proceeded against or could be affected by a judgment rendered in a proceeding where such person was not the one who in person violated provisions of law.
#### Samuel Shopiro, Respondent, v. Samuel Berlin and Another, Appellants.

Order striking out amended answer modified so as to provide that the amended answer may stand upon condition that the appellants.shall, within five days after service of a copy of this order, stipulate to proceed to trial of the case at the Trial Term of the Supreme Court now in session in Onondaga county; and as so modified the order is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Order denying motion to change venue affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
No: III-23-003 February 1, 2023

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662 

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663 

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at the Point Beach Nuclear Plant

The NRC has selected Michael Stafford as the new senior 

resident inspector at the Point Beach Nuclear Plant in Two Rivers, 

Wisconsin. 

Stafford joined the NRC in 2015 as a project engineer in the 

NRC’s Region IV office. He served as acting resident inspector at the 

Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Callaway Plant, and Grand Gulf 

Nuclear Plant. He became resident inspector at the Cooper Nuclear 

Station in 2017. Subsequently, Stafford served as acting senior resident 

inspector at the Cooper Nuclear Station and the Wolf Creek Generating 

Station. Stafford has worked as a headquarters operations officer since 

2021. Prior to joining the NRC, he served as a shift test engineer at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard. Stafford 

holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Ohio State University. 

“We look forward to Mike joining Region III as the new senior resident inspector at Point Beach. He 

brings in-depth knowledge of maintenance practices and extensive experience implementing the Reactor 

Oversight Process. In addition, while serving as a headquarters operations officer, Mike interacted with a 

wide variety of stakeholders honing invaluable communications skills, which will help him meet the 

agency’s goal of improving public confidence,” said NRC Region III Administrator Jack Giessner. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve 

as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring significant work projects, 

and interacting with plant workers and the public.
#### Dominick Orlando v. Manhattan Fire & Marine Insurance Company.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY F. SANCHEZ, P.A. 

6701 SUNSET DRIVE, SUITE 101, MIAMI, FL, 33143 • TELEPHONE (305) 665-9211

PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW RE: “ISSUE TO BE BRIEFED” NO. 11

Issue No. 11: Is “unclean hands” an affirmative defense in an action for damages 

(as opposed to a defense when the Court is sitting in equity, such as in connection 

with a motion for injunctive relief)?

[The Court’s “Post-Hearing Administrative Order [ECF No. 190] directed the 

parties to skip over this issue and proceed to Issue No. 12.]

Case 1:20-cv-22603-JG Document 194-11 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### Eleanor Hesseltine, Respondent, v. Nathan Sulzberger, Appellant.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant and the motion to vacate the notice of examination granted in all respects. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §674. Librarian

(a) The Supreme Court may appoint a librarian, whose salary it shall fix, and who shall be subject to removal by the Court.

(b) The librarian shall, with the approval of the Chief Justice, appoint necessary assistants and fix their compensation and make rules governing the use of the library.

(c) He shall select and acquire by purchase, gift, bequest, or exchange, such books, pamphlets, periodicals, microfilm and other processed copy as may be required by the Court for its official use and for the reasonable needs of its bar.

(d) The librarian shall certify to the marshal for payment vouchers covering expenditures for the purchase of such books and other material, and for binding, rebinding and repairing the same.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 919; Pub. L. 92–310, title II, §206(d), June 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 203.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

This section gives statutory recognition to the office of librarian. For many years the Court has appointed its librarian directly through the Chief Justice, rather than through the marshal. Other members of the library staff are appointed by the librarian, with the approval of the Chief Justice.

Under this section the marshal will not be required to certify to expenditures for some 2,000 books bought for the library each year but this will be the duty of the librarian.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1972—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 92–310 struck out sentence which required the librarian to furnish a bond.
Exhibit 99.2

                           Certification of Controller
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection  with this annual  report on Form 10-KSB of United  Tennessee
Bankshares,   Inc.  I,  Chris  H.  Triplett,   Controller  of  United  Tennessee
Bankshares,  Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in this report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of United Tennessee Bankshares, Inc.



Date:  March 28, 2003                            /s/ Chris H. Triplett
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Chris H. Triplett
                                                 Controller
No: 24-023 April 10, 2024 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Makes Available TerraPower’s Construction Permit Application

for Site in Kemmerer, Wyoming

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received a construction permit application from 

TerraPower seeking permission to build the company’s Natrium nuclear power plant near 

Kemmerer, Wyoming. The application is now available for public inspection on the NRC 

website.

TerraPower filed the application on March 28, requesting a permit to build the sodiumcooled, advanced reactor design on a site near an existing coal-fired power plant. The 

345-megawatt electric Natrium plant includes an energy storage system to temporarily boost 

output up to 500 MWe, when needed. If the NRC ultimately issues the permit, TerraPower 

would need to submit a separate operating license application in the future to obtain permission 

to run the reactor. 

The NRC staff is processing the application to determine if it has sufficient information 

to begin the agency’s safety and environmental reviews. If the application is determined to be 

complete, the staff will docket it and publish a notice of opportunity to request a hearing before 

the NRC’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board. 

Information about the regulation of new reactors is available on the NRC website. A copy 

of the TerraPower construction permit application will be available at the Lincoln County 

Library – Kemmerer at 519 Emerald St., in Kemmerer.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      31,314,834
<SECURITIES>                                10,803,630
<RECEIVABLES>                                  340,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,842,173
<PP&E>                                       2,532,790
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,083,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,695,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,137,859
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       129,556
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,410,107
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,695,339
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,320,456
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,349,644
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,924,757)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,924,757)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,924,757)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)
        

</TABLE>
§ 142.23 Are there limits on disclosure of documents or discovery? ( a ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant may review all non-privileged, relevant and material documents, records and other material related to the allegations contained in the complaint. After paying SBA a reasonable fee for duplication, the defendant may obtain a copy of the records described.
( b ) Upon written request to the reviewing official, the defendant may obtain a copy of all exculpatory information in the possession of the reviewing official or investigating official relating to the allegations in the complaint. If the document would otherwise be privileged, only the portion of the document containing exculpatory information must be disclosed. As used in this section, the term “information” does not include legal materials such as statutes or case law obtained through legal research.
( c ) The notice sent to the Attorney General from the reviewing official is not discoverable under any circumstances.
( d ) Other discovery is available only as ordered by the ALJ and includes only those methods of discovery allowed by § 134.213 of this chapter.
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 January 2006

(2006/C 7/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
No: II-23-032 November 8, 2023 

Contact: Dave Gasperson, 404-997-4417 

NRC Schedules Regulatory Conference with Dominion Energy

To Discuss Preliminary Yellow Finding for Inoperable Diesel

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a regulatory conference with officials from 

Dominion Energy on Nov. 13 to discuss the safety significance of a preliminary “yellow” finding at 

the V.C. Summer nuclear power plant in Jenkinsville, South Carolina. 

The finding is related to the licensee’s failure to identify and correct a problem with one of 

the plant’s emergency diesel generators. The NRC staff preliminarily characterized the finding 

under the NRC’s color-coded system in the reactor oversight process as yellow, or having 

substantial safety significance that could result in additional NRC inspections. 

In November 2022, operators discovered a leak from a cracked fuel oil pipe in the 

emergency diesel generator during routine testing. Despite previous instances of similar issues, the 

NRC found Dominion Energy did not make significant maintenance or design changes to correct 

the issue. The finding is detailed in an October inspection report. 

The conference starts at 10 a.m. Eastern time at the NRC’s Region II Office, Marquis One 

Tower, 245 Peachtree Center Avenue NE, in Atlanta. The NRC staff will be available to answer 

questions from the public after the formal part of the meeting. 

Members of the public can listen to the meeting by phone by calling 301-576-2978 and 

entering the conference number 702832471#. 

During the conference, Dominion Energy officials will have the opportunity to present their 

perspective on the findings, provide additional information and clarification, and discuss corrective 

actions taken or planned.
### §1193a. Preemption of State anti-garnishment laws

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, this part shall supersede any law of a State which would directly or indirectly prohibit or restrict the use of an automatic contribution arrangement, described in section 1193(d)(2) of this title, for a pension-linked emergency savings account. The Secretary may promulgate regulations to establish minimum standards that such an arrangement would be required to satisfy in order for this subsection to apply with respect to such an account.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title I, §802, as added Pub. L. 117–328, div. T, title I, §127(b)(1), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5323.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to plan years beginning after Dec. 31, 2023, see section 127(g) of Pub. L. 117–328, set out as an Effective Date of 2022 Amendment note under section 72 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.217 Settlement.

At any time during the pendency of a case, the parties may submit a joint motion to dismiss the appeal if they have settled the case, and may file with such motion a copy of the settlement agreement. If the Judge has express authority, under statute, SBA regulation or SBA standard operating procedures, to review the contents of a settlement agreement for legality, the Judge may order the parties to file a copy of the settlement agreement. Otherwise, upon the filing of a joint motion to dismiss, the Judge will issue an order dismissing the case. Settlement negotiations, and rejected settlement agreements, are not admissible into evidence.

[61 FR 2683, Jan. 29, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 47249, July 18, 2002]
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Dissolved Noble Gases in Liquid Effluents and Compliance With Technical Specifications 3.11.1

## HPPOS-212 PDR-9111220007

See the memorandum from L. J. Cunningham to F. J. Hebdon (and others) dated July 12, 1987.

The TS limit for dissolved or entrained noble gases in liquids is 200 picocurie/ml total activity. This limit is independent of other nuclides. There is no need to include noble gases in the MPC summation formula in Note 1 of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 20 (§§20.1-20.601). The health physics position was written in the context of 10 CFR 20.106, but it also applies to Section 20.1302 and Appendix B, Note 4, of the "new" 10 CFR Part 20 (§§ 20.1001-20.2401).

Standard Technical Specification 3.11.1 states: "The concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS ... shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 200 picocurie/ml total activity."

In response to an inquiry from a licensee, RPB said that the staff does not consider Part 20, Appendix B to give limits for noble gases in water. Specifically, the footnotes addressing "nuclides not listed above" do not apply to the noble gases because the noble gases are listed. RPB also said that the technical specification limit for noble gases is independent of the concentrations of other nuclides. That is, the LCO is satisfied if noble gas concentration does not exceed 200 picocurie/ml and the concentrations of other nuclides do not add up to more than one MPC equivalent using Note 1 to Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 20 (§§20.1-20.601) [or one DAC equivalent using Note 4 to Appendix B of 10 CFR Part 20 (§§20.2001-20.24010]. Hence, there is no need to include the noble gases in the Part 20 summation formula [i.e., the DAC summation formula in Note 4 of Appendix B to §§20.1001-20.2401].

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 20.106, 10 CFR 20.1302, Technical Specifications

**Subject codes:** 7.3, 9.2

**Applicability:** Reactors

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 17, 2017
### §§1641 to 1646. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–220, title I, §199(b)(2), Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1059

Section 1641, Pub. L. 97–300, title II, §261, as added Pub. L. 102–367, title II, §206, Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1063, stated purpose of youth training program.

Section 1642, Pub. L. 97–300, title II, §262, as added Pub. L. 102–367, title VII, §701(f)(1), Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1107, related to allotment and allocation.

Section 1643, Pub. L. 97–300, title II, §263, as added Pub. L. 102–367, title II, §208, Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1066; amended Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §391(n)(2), (3), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4024; Pub. L. 106–78, title VII, §752(b)(12), Oct. 22, 1999, 113 Stat. 1169, related to eligibility for services.

Section 1644, Pub. L. 97–300, title II, §264, as added Pub. L. 102–367, title II, §208, Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1068; amended Pub. L. 104–193, title I, §110(n)(9), Aug. 22, 1996, 110 Stat. 2174, related to program design.

Section 1645, Pub. L. 97–300, title II, §265, as added Pub. L. 102–367, title II, §208, Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1071; amended Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §391(n)(4), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4024; Pub. L. 104–193, title I, §110(n)(10), Aug. 22, 1996, 110 Stat. 2174, related to linkages with other agencies and programs.

Section 1646, Pub. L. 97–300, title II, §266, as added Pub. L. 102–367, title II, §208, Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1073, related to transfer of funds.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 2000, see section 199(c)(2)(B) of Pub. L. 105–220, set out as a note under section 1501 of this title.
#### Edward Friedman, Appellant, v. Harold T. White et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of White, Weld & Co., Respondents.

Whether or not the discontinuance with prejudice amounts to a release which would be a defense should await the determination upon the trial. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
§ 142.12 How does a defendant respond to the complaint? ( a ) A defendant may file an answer with the reviewing official and the Office of Hearings and Appeals within 30 days of service of the complaint. An answer will be considered a request for an oral hearing.
( b ) In the answer, a defendant— ( 1 ) Must admit or deny each of the allegations of liability contained in the complaint (a failure to deny an allegation is considered an admission);
( 2 ) Must state any defense on which the defendant intends to rely;
( 3 ) May state any reasons why he or she believes the penalties, assessments, or both should be less than the statutory maximum; and
( 4 ) Must state the name, address, and telephone number of the person authorized by the defendant to act as defendant's representative, if any.
( c ) If the defendant is unable to file an answer which meets the requirements set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, the defendant may file with the reviewing official a general answer denying liability, requesting a hearing, and requesting an extension of time in which to file a complete answer. A general answer must be filed within 30 days of service of the complaint.
( d ) If the defendant initially files a general answer requesting an extension of time, the reviewing official must promptly file with the ALJ the complaint, the general answer, and the request for an extension of time.
( e ) For good cause shown, the ALJ may grant the defendant up to 30 additional days within which to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. Such answer must be filed with OHA and a copy must be served on the reviewing official.