alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5017 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5017

            To repeal the corporate alternative minimum tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2022

Mr. Barrasso (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Braun, Mr. 
 Cassidy, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Lankford, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Portman, Mr. Risch, 
   Mr. Toomey, Mr. Young, Mr. Wicker, and Mr. Hoeven) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To repeal the corporate alternative minimum tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Repealing the Ill-Conceived and 
Problematic (RIP) Book Minimum Tax Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CORPORATE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX.

    (a) In General.--Sections 10101 and 13904(a) of Public Law 117-169 
are repealed.
    (b) Applicability.--The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be 
applied and administered as if such sections (and the amendments made 
by such sections) had not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management   

          - [ES-960-1420-BJ-TRST; ES-052442, Group No. 156, Minnesota]   

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.   

# ACTION:

Notice of filing of plat of survey; Minnesota.   

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia, 30 calender days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                       

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.   

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.   

The lands we surveyed are:   

## Fifth Principal Meridian, Minnesota   

T. 142 N., R. 39 W.

The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a portion of the north, south and east boundaries and a portion of the subdivisional lines; the survey of the subdivision of sections 5, 6, 19, 20, 24, 30, and 36; and the corrective dependent resurvey of a portion of the east boundary; and the corrective survey of the subdivision of section 1, of Township 142 North, Range 39 West, Fifth Principal Meridian, in the State of Minnesota, and was accepted September 23, 2004. We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It will be available to the public as a matter of information.   

If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest.   

We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, including decisions on appeals.   

Dated: September 23, 2004.   

Stephen D. Douglas,   

Chief Cadastral Surveyor.   

[FR Doc. 04-22806 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]   

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5091 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to authorize the expansion of the 

Appalachian development highway system. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2022 

Mr. MANCHIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to authorize the 

expansion of the Appalachian development highway system. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fixing Our Country 

5 Roads Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF APPALACHIAN DEVELOPMENT 

7 HIGHWAY SYSTEM. 

8 Section 14501 of title 40, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5091 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a), in the second sentence, by 

2 striking ‘‘three thousand and ninety miles’’ and in3 serting ‘‘the total number of miles established by the 

4 Secretary under subsection (h)’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(h) EXPANSION OF THE APPALACHIAN DEVELOP7 MENT HIGHWAY SYSTEM.—As soon as practicable after 

8 the date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary 

9 shall establish the total number of miles that is authorized 

10 to be constructed for the Appalachian development high11 way system under subsection (a) based on— 

12 ‘‘(1) a report prepared by the Secretary before 

13 the date of enactment of this subsection in which the 

14 Secretary describes the total number of miles that 

15 should be authorized to be constructed for the Appa16 lachian development highway system under sub17 section (a); or 

18 ‘‘(2) if the Secretary determines that there is 

19 not an existing report that addresses the matters de20 scribed in paragraph (1), a report prepared by the 

21 Secretary, in consultation with the Appalachian Re22 gional Commission and applicable State departments 

23 of transportation, as soon as practicable after the 

24 date of enactment of this subsection, that describes 

25 the total number of miles that should be authorized 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5091 IS

1 to be constructed for the Appalachian development 

2 highway system under subsection (a).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
### §6340. Records of sale

#### (a) Requirement

The Secretary shall, for each internal revenue district, keep a record of all sales of property under section 6335 and of redemptions of such property. The record shall set forth the tax for which any such sale was made, the dates of seizure and sale, the name of the party assessed and all proceedings in making such sale, the amount of expenses, the names of the purchasers, and the date of the deed or certificate of sale of personal property.

#### (b) Copy as evidence

A copy of such record, or any part thereof, certified by the Secretary shall be evidence in any court of the truth of the facts therein stated.

#### (c) Accounting to taxpayer

The taxpayer with respect to whose liability the sale was conducted or who redeemed the property shall be furnished—

(1) the record under subsection (a) (other than the names of the purchasers);

(2) the amount from such sale applied to the taxpayer's liability; and

(3) the remaining balance of such liability.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 789; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 105–206, title III, §3442(a), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 761.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–206, §3442(a)(1), struck out "real" after "sales of" and inserted "or certificate of sale of personal property" after "deed".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105–206, §3442(a)(2), added subsec. (c).

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Pub. L. 105–206, title III, §3442(b), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 762, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to seizures occurring after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 22, 1998]."
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22975]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 27, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. Nicholas, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Todd L. Johnson, Superior, Wisconsin; to acquire voting shares 
of NATCOM Bancshares, Inc., Superior, Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly 
acquire voting shares of National Bank of Commerce, Superior,Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 7, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-22975 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateEnforcementSanctions for Discrimination Against Employees Who Raise Safety Concerns

# Discrimination Task Group Public Stakeholder Meetings

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 7, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Federal Register Notice
          - Charter
          - Draft Report and Comments
          - General Comments
          - Public Stakeholder Meetings

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 7, 2020
S a c r a m e n t o

R i

v e

r

T31N R4W

0

17

20

18

19

5

SSHHAASSTTAA CC OO 240.3 L

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion Contract No. 14-06-200-4348A-R-1

Exhibit B

Daniell, Harry W.

725-202-18

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.25 0.5

Miles

Date: March 17, 2005

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\daniell_harry\daniell_harry.mxd
cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge 

Kerry P. Faughnan 

Brooks Hubby LLP 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A ,mileltco
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 72

**Question 72:** Will certain materials licensees (such as teletherapy and brachytherapy licensees) be required to conduct environmental monitoring in unrestricted areas to demonstrate compliance with the new dose limit for individual members of the public?

**Answer:** Yes. The licensee must demonstrate compliance with 10 CFR 20.1301. Licensees must perform radiation surveys in areas adjacent to locations where radioactive materials are used or stored. It is unlikely, however, that a licensee will need to perform effluent or environmental monitoring if it is only licensed for teletherapy and/or brachytherapy.

(References: 10 CFR 20.1302, Byproduct Material licenses (medical))

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, December 13, 2017
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Robert J. McArdle, as Executor and Trustee under the Will of Michael J. Dady, Deceased, Appellant. Lafayette National Bank of Brooklyn in New York, as Substituted Trustee under the Will of Michael J. Dady, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.; Hagarty, J., not voting.
### §8001. Authorization

There shall be a joint congressional committee known as the Joint Committee on Taxation (hereinafter in this subtitle referred to as the "Joint Committee").

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 925; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1907(a)(1), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1835.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "Internal Revenue" after "Committee on".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1907(c), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1836, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section and sections 8004, 8021, and 8023 of this title and enacting provisions set out below] shall take effect on the first day of the first month which begins more than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 4, 1976]."

#### References to Joint Committee on Internal Revenue Taxation

Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1907(a)(5), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1836, provided that: "All references in any other statute, or in any rule, regulation, or order, to the Joint Committee on Internal Revenue Taxation shall be considered to be made to the Joint Committee on Taxation."
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50440 (Summary Calendar)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LAZARO GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
(USDC No. SA-95-CR-372)

- - - - - - - - - -

September 25, 1997 Before SMITH, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Mario Antonio Pozo, a/k/a Lazaro Garcia, appeals fr om his

sentence for possession with intent to distribute in excess of 50

grams of cocaine base. He argues that the district court erred:

1) by sentencing him pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(iii)

because the Government failed to establi sh that he possessed in

excess of 50 grams of cocaine base; 2) by sentencing him as a2

career offender; and 3) by refusing to reduce his offense level

based upon acceptance of responsibility. Our review of the record

and the arguments and authorities convinces us that no reversible

error was co mmitted. The district court did not plainly err by

sentencing Pozo in accordance with § 841(b)(1)(A)(iii). S ee United

States v. Calverley

, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc).

Pozo’s argument that the court erred by applying § 4B1.1's careeroffender enhancement is facially frivolous because the PSR reflects

that Pozo had three pri or convictions relevant to the careeroffender enhancement, two for selling marijuana and one for

robbery. The district court adopted the PSR, and therefore, even

if the two drug offenses should have been counted as one, Pozo

still would have had two qualifying prior felony convictions.

See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. Finally, the district court did not clearly

err by refusing to reduce Pozo’s offense level for acceptance of

responsibility, particularly in light of the court’s finding that

Pozo had obstructed justice. S ee United States v. Flucas

, 99 F.3d

177, 180 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 1097 (1997).

AFFIRMED.
### §92. Idaho

Idaho, exclusive of Yellowstone National Park, constitutes one judicial district.

Court shall be held at Boise, Coeur d'Alene, Moscow, and Pocatello.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 877; Pub. L. 91–272, §5, June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 297.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §151 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §78, 36 Stat. 1109; May 11, 1939, ch. 121, 53 Stat. 738).

All of Yellowstone National Park is included in the judicial district of Wyoming by section 131 of this title. Those parts of the park lying in Idaho are accordingly excluded from the judicial district of Idaho.

A provision as to the places for maintenance of the clerk's offices, and requiring that they be open at all times, was omitted as covered by sections 452–751 of this title.

Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–272 struck out provisions which had divided the judicial district of Idaho into a Northern Division, a Central Division, a Southern Division, and an Eastern Division.
### FOR PUBLICATION 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES T RUSTEE , William No. 03-16067 T. Neary, D.C. No. Appellant, CV-03-00210-CRB 

# 
v. JUDGMENT K ERAVISION , I NC ., ORDER

Debtor-Appellee. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 9, 2005—San Francisco, California

Filed September 7, 2005 Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, and

Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.

COUNSEL Eric D. Miller (briefed and argued), and Robert M. Loeb (briefed), United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the appellant. Peter M. Gilhuly (briefed and argued), Kathryn M. Davis (briefed), and Eric D. Brown (briefed), Latham & Watkins LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the appellee.

12515ORDER We affirm the judgment entered by the district court for the reasons stated in its opinion approving the appointment of the law firm. See In re Keravision, Inc. , 273 B.R. 614 (N.D. Cal. 2002). **1** The trustee did not raise the rules of professional responsibility in challenging the law firm’s appointment before the district court. See id . at 618. Therefore, we decline to address that issue on appeal. See United States v. Alisal Water Corp. , 370 F.3d 915, 923 (9th Cir. 2004). AFFIRMED

.

**1** We have jurisdiction over this appeal because the order awarding attorneys’ fees is a final determination of the payment to be distributed to Latham from the estate. See Yermakov v. Fitzsimmons ( In re Yermakov ), 718 F.2d 1465, 1469 (9th Cir. 1983). 12516 U NITED S TATES T RUSTEE v. K ERAVISION , I NC
.PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2005 Thomson/West.
----

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2006/C 21/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Date of adoption: 

Number of the aid: N 274/2005

Member State: Poland

Title in original language: Huta Cynku Miasteczko Śląskie

Legal basis: Ustawa z dnia 30 sierpnia 1996 r. o komercjalizacji i prywatyzacji — art. 56 ust. 1 pkt 2 oraz art. 56 ust. 5

Objective: Rescue of firms in difficulty

Duration: 6 months

Further information: 

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

Date of adoption: 

Member State: Germany

Aid number: N 501/2003

Title: Prolongation of the programme for the employment of innovation assistants in Berlin

Objective: employment

Legal basis: Verwaltungsvorschriften zu §44 Landeshaushaltsordnung

Budget: EUR 1,8 million per year

Intensity or amount: Up to 65 %

Duration: 1.1.2004 — 31.12.2006

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

Date of adoption of the decision: 

Member State: France

Aid No: N 531/05

Title: Measures relating to the creation and operation of the Banque Postale (post office bank)

Objective: Banking and insurance

Legal basis: Loi no 2005-516 du 20 mai 2005 relative à la régulation des activités postales; Décret no 2005-1068 du 30 août 2005 pris pour l'application de l'article 16 de la loi no 2005-516 du 20 mai 2005 relatives à la régulation des activités postales

Aid intensity or amount: Measures not constituting aid

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

----
§ 11.70 Scope and purpose. ( a ) The Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), is authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3721 to settle and pay (including replacement in kind) claims of officers and employees of FEMA, amounting to not more than $25,000 for damage to or loss of personal property incident to their service. Property may be replaced in-kind at the option of the Government. Claims are payable only for such types, quantities, or amounts of tangible personal property (including money) as the approving authority shall determine to be reasonable, useful, or proper under the circumstances existing at the time and place of the loss. In determining what is reasonable, useful, or proper, the approving authority will consider the type and quantity of property involved, circumstances attending acquisition and use of the property, and whether possession or use by the claimant at the time of damage or loss was incident to service.
( b ) The Government does not underwrite all personal property losses that a claimant may sustain and it does not underwrite individual tastes. While the Government does not attempt to limit possession of property by an individual, payment for damage or loss is made only to the extent that the possession of the property is determined to be reasonable, useful, or proper. If individuals possess excessive quantities of items, or expensive items, they should have such property privately insured. Failure of the claimant to comply with these procedures may reduce or preclude payment of the claim under this subpart.
#### Malvina Stuart, Appellant, v. Mrs. Gilbert Northrup, Respondent.

Judgment of County Court reversed and judgment of Justice’s Court reinstated, with costs to appellant in this court and in County Court. Held, that the defendant, not having given the undertaking as required by section 2952 of the Code of Civil Procedure, was precluded in her defense from drawing the title in question. (Code Civ. Proe. § 2955.) All concurred.