alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 113.8 Effect on other regulations, forms and instructions. ( a ) *Effect on other regulations.* All regulations, orders of like directions heretofore issued by SBA which impose requirements designed to prohibit any discrimination against individuals on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, marital status, age, or national origin and which authorize the suspension or termination of a refusal to grant to or to continue financial assistance to any applicant for or recipient of such assistance for failure to comply with such requirements, are hereby superseded to the extent that such discrimination is prohibited by this part, except that nothing in this part shall be deemed to relieve any person of any obligation assumed or imposed under any such superseded regulation, order, instruction or like direction prior to the effective date of this part.
( b ) *Forms and instructions.* SBA shall issue and promptly make available to interested persons forms and detailed instructions and procedures for effectuating this part.
( c ) *Supervision and coordination.* The Administrator may from time-to-time assign to officials of SBA or to officials of other agencies of the Government, with the consent of such agencies, responsibilities in connection with the effectuation of the purposes of this part (other than responsibility of first decisions as provided in § 113.9) including the achievement of effective coordination and maximum uniformity within SBA and within the executive branch of the Government in the application of this part and of comparable regulations issued by other agencies of the Government to similar situations. Any action taken, determination made, or requirement imposed by an official of another department or agency acting pursuant to an assignment of responsibility under this subsection shall have the same effect as though such action had been taken by the Administrator of SBA.
[44 FR 20068, Apr. 4, 1979. Redesignated at 49 FR 33629, Aug. 24, 1984]
#### Peterson *v.*Calhoun.

Beck, J.

1. Where one as the head of a family consisting of his wife and certain named minor children filed, on November 15, 1879, an application “to have laid off and set apart to be exempt from levy and sale as a homestead . . on or out of one tract of land . . containing four hundred acres known as the homestead whereon petitioner lives, a portion or the whole of said real estate, not to exceed the value of two thousand dollars in specie,” and where in said application petitioner also prayed for the setting apart of certain personal property “not to exceed one thousand dollars in specie,” attaching to the application as an exhibit a schedule of certain personal property and a list of his creditors, but not accompanying the application with a schedule containing a “description of all of his real and personal property,” which petition was filed in the office of the ordinary on the date last above referred to; and where the county surveyor who laid off the homestead made a plat thereof, showing that it contained 525 acres, and, in an affidavit ac*104companying the plat, deposed merely that “the above [platl represents the homestead of Malcolm D. Peterson [the applicant] surveyed on the 28th day of November, 1879, and that the same is not worth two thousand dollars specie,” which affidavit and return of the surveyor was made the first day of December, 1879; and on the date last stated there was endorsed upon the schedule of personal property the following: “Passed upon and' approved Dec. 1st, 1878 [1879?]. Phil. McRae, O. M. C.,” and upon the plat of the realty the following: “Plat of the homestead of M. D. Peterson. Passed upon and approved Dec. 1st, 1879, by Phil. McRae, Ody. M. C.,” which papers and the endorsements thereon were duly recorded in the office of the clerk 'of the superior court: *Held,*that the court did not err, in the trial of a claim case, in excluding the homestead papers above set forth, together with the orders and returns thereon, when they were offered as the basis of the claim filed; as they did not show a valid homestead and exemption of the property claimed as exempt. Civil Code, §§ 2828, 2834, 2837.

September 21, 1910.

Claim. Before Judge Martin. Montgomery superior court. August 14, 1909.

Cited by counsel:

99 *Ga.*301; 101 *Ga.*474; 105 *Ga.*185; 106 *Ga.*180; 109 *Ga.*296; 117 *Ga.*940; 118 *Ga.*270; 123 *Ga.*344, 477; 128 *Ga.*117; 129 *Ga.*716; Civil Code, §§ 2828-2837, 5371, 5373, 5912.

*A. G. Saffold*and *W. M. Lewis,*for plairitiff in error.

*M. B. Calhoun*and *Graham &*Graham, contra.

2. Upon the exclusion of the homfestead record, a verdict for the plaintiff in execution necessarily followed, as is conceded by counsel for both parties. ■ *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.207 Amendments and supplemental pleadings. ( a ) *Amendments.* Upon motion (*see* § 134.211), and under terms needed to avoid prejudice to any non-moving party, the Judge may permit the filing and service of amendments to pleadings. However, an amendment will not be permitted if it would cause unreasonable delay in the determination of the matter. The proposed amendment must be filed and served with the motion. The Judge, on his or her own initiative, may order a party to file and serve an amendment to a pleading.
( b ) *Supplemental pleadings.* Upon motion (*see* § 134.211), and under terms needed to avoid prejudice to any non-moving party, the Judge may permit the filing and service of a supplemental pleading setting forth relevant transactions or occurrences that have taken place since the filing of the original pleading. The proposed supplemental pleading must be filed and served with the motion. The Judge, on his or her own initiative, may order a party to file and serve a supplemental pleading.
( c ) *8(a) appeals.* In 8(a) program appeals, amendments to pleadings and supplemental pleadings will be permitted by the Judge only upon a showing of good cause.
( d ) *Answer or response.* In an order permitting the filing and service of an amended or supplemented petition or order to show cause, the Judge will establish the time for filing and serving an answer or response.
[61 FR 2683, Jan. 29, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 47248, July 18, 2002; 75 FR 47441, Aug. 6, 2010]
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 502 

To amend chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, to incorporate zeroemission fueling technology into the definition of ‘‘capital project’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2021 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, to 

incorporate zero-emission fueling technology into the definition of ‘‘capital project’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘More Access to ZEV 

5 Equipment in Transit Act’’ or the ‘‘MAZE in Transit 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. ZERO-EMISSION FUELING TECHNOLOGY. 

8 Section 5302(3)(G)(v) of title 49, United States 

9 Code, is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 502 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subclauses (XII), (XIII), 

2 and (XIV) as subclauses (XIII), (XIV), and (XV), 

3 respectively; and 

4 (2) by inserting after subclause (XI) the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(XII) technology to fuel a zero 

7 emission vehicle (as defined in section 

8 5339(c));’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
(March 3, 1948.)

#### William A. Schenck v. Joseph Meyer, Jr., et al.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Motion for other relief granted as stated in order. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See 270 App. Div. 1002.]
1 

EAST\176258908.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

VICTOR ARIZA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. Case No.: 1:20-cv-22642-KMM-Becerra 

WINGSTOP RESTAURANTS, INC., 

a foreign for-profit corporation, 

 Defendant. 

 ___________/ 

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT IN ORDER TO STAY THIS MATTER 

AND ALLOW THE PARTIES TIME TO FINALIZE AGREEMENT 

 Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA and Defendant, WINGSTOP RESTAURANTS, INC., by and 

through undersigned counsel, hereby notify the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in 

principle, and request that the Court stay all pending deadlines in this action.

/s/ Roderick V. Hannah 

Roderick V. Hannah 

Fla. Bar No. 435384 

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

4800 N. Hiatus Road 

Sunrise, FL 33351 

Phone: 954-362-3800 

Fax: 954-362-3779 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com

-andPelayo M. Duran 

Fla. Bar No. 0146595 

LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

4640 N.W. 7th Street 

Miami, FL 33126-2309 

Phone: 305-266-9780 

Fax: 305-269-8311 

Email: duranandassociates@gmail.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

/s/ Amanda E. Reagan 

Amanda E. Reagan 

Florida Bar No. 92520 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

3111 W. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. 

Suite 300 

Tampa, Florida 33607-6233 

Phone: 813-229-2111 

Fax: 813-229-1447 

Email:amy.reagan@dlapiper.com

 sheila.hall@dlapiper.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Wingstop Restaurants, Inc.

Case 1:20-cv-22642-KMM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/03/2020 Page 1 of 2
2 

EAST\176258908.1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on September 3, 2020, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send 

notification of such filing to the following counsel of record: 

Roderick V. Hannah 

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

4800 N. Hiatus Road 

Sunrise, FL 33351 

Phone: 954-362-3800 

Fax: 954-362-3779 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com

-andPelayo M. Duran 

LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

4640 N.W. 7th Street 

Miami, FL 33126-2309 

Phone: 305-266-9780 

Fax: 305-269-8311 

Email: duranandassociates@gmail.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

/s/ Amanda E. Reagan 

 Attorney 

Case 1:20-cv-22642-KMM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/03/2020 Page 2 of 2
0-cr-06218-NCR Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2000 Pa
0-cr-06218-NCR Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2000 Pa
0-cr-06218-NCR Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2000 Pa
0-cr-06218-NCR Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2000 Pa
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation de Belgique by judgment of that court of 7 October 2005 in Raffaele Talotta v État belge

(Case C-383/05)

(2006/C 10/21)

Language of the case: French

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of the Cour de cassation de Belgique (Belgian Court of Cassation) of 7 October 2005, received at the Court Registry on 24 October 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Raffaele Talotta and the État belge on the following question:

Is Article 43 (formerly Article 52) of the EC Treaty to be interpreted as prohibiting a provision of national law, such as Article 182 of the [Belgian] Royal Decree of 27 August 1993 implementing Article 342(2) of the Income Tax Code 1992, whereby minimum tax bases are applied only in the case of non-residents?

----
§ 404.38 Are there different requirements for determining the appropriate non-Federal share of construction costs to be paid by Indian tribes? Yes. The appropriate non-Federal share of construction costs to be paid by Indian tribes will be based on: ( a ) Consideration of an Indian tribe's capability to pay at least 25 percent of the construction costs, to be determined in accordance with the factors in § 404.39; and
( b ) If Reclamation determines, based on the analysis in § 404.38(a), that an Indian tribe is not capable of paying at least 25 percent of the construction costs, Reclamation may recommend in its feasibility report that the collection of all or part of the non-Federal construction costs apportioned to an Indian tribe be deferred, unless or until Reclamation determines that the Indian tribe should pay all or a portion of those costs.
#### § 108.10 Description of the New Markets Venture Capital Program.

The New Markets Venture Capital (“NMVC”) Program is a developmental venture capital program for the purpose of promoting economic development and the creation of wealth and job opportunities in low-income geographic areas and among individuals living in such areas. SBA selects and then enters into participation agreements with selected newly formed venture capital companies, and provides leverage in the form of debenture guarantees to such companies to allow them to make equity capital investments in smaller enterprises located in low-income geographic areas. SBA also awards grants to such companies and to Specialized Small Business Investment Companies so that they can provide operational assistance to such smaller enterprises in connection with such investments.
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateAllegations

# Safety Conscious Work Environment Policy Guidance

        -  Chilling Effect Letter Guidance, Section 5.2.j.6 of the Allegation Manual 
        -  NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2005-18, "Guidance for Establishing and Maintaining a Safety Conscious Work Environment" 
        -  1996 NRC Policy Statement, "Freedom of Employees in the Nuclear Industry to Raise Safety Concerns Without Fear of Retaliation" 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 7, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - What is an Allegation
          - Frequently Asked Questions
          - Allegations Annual Reports
          - Report a Safety or Security Concern
          - Statistics on Allegations
          - Safety Conscious Work Environment Policy Guidance
          - Public Meetings

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 7, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          79,010
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,010
<PP&E>                                     138,566,663
<DEPRECIATION>                              86,093,750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,551,923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          141,893
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,410,030
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,551,923
<SALES>                                     13,221,630
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,267,008
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  478,807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,286,201
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,286,201
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.31
        

</TABLE>
### §3704. Applicability

(a) Section 3702 shall not apply to—

(1) a lottery, sweepstakes, or other betting, gambling, or wagering scheme in operation in a State or other governmental entity, to the extent that the scheme was conducted by that State or other governmental entity at any time during the period beginning January 1, 1976, and ending August 31, 1990;

(2) a lottery, sweepstakes, or other betting, gambling, or wagering scheme in operation in a State or other governmental entity where both—

(A) such scheme was authorized by a statute as in effect on October 2, 1991; and

(B) a scheme described in section 3702 (other than one based on parimutuel animal racing or jai-alai games) actually was conducted in that State or other governmental entity at any time during the period beginning September 1, 1989, and ending October 2, 1991, pursuant to the law of that State or other governmental entity;

(3) a betting, gambling, or wagering scheme, other than a lottery described in paragraph (1), conducted exclusively in casinos located in a municipality, but only to the extent that—

(A) such scheme or a similar scheme was authorized, not later than one year after the effective date of this chapter, to be operated in that municipality; and

(B) any commercial casino gaming scheme was in operation in such municipality throughout the 10-year period ending on such effective date pursuant to a comprehensive system of State regulation authorized by that State's constitution and applicable solely to such municipality; or

(4) parimutuel animal racing or jai-alai games.

(b) Except as provided in subsection (a), section 3702 shall apply on lands described in section 4(4) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2703(4)).

(Added Pub. L. 102–559, §2(a), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4228.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The effective date of this chapter, referred to in subsec. (a)(3)(A), is Jan. 1, 1993, see section 3 of Pub. L. 102–559, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3701 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1993, see section 3 of Pub. L. 102–559, set out as a note under section 3701 of this title.
### Part B—Federal Responsibilities
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section




National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Contact Us
  Return to Previous Page
 Thing to Do
Queen's/Navajo Combination Loop
Bryce Canyon National Park Hikers walk along a trail towards an open archway in the red rockHikers approach an archway on the Queen's Garden side of the Combination Loop Trailhead:Sunrise or Sunset Point
Parking: Available at both Sunrise and Sunset Points (check when parking lots are busiest). Oversized vehicles are not permitted in these parking areas when the shuttle is in operation.
Distance: 2.9 miles (4.6 km)
Approximate Time: 2-3 hours
Elevation Gain: 625 feet (191 meters)
Difficulty: Moderate (less than 1000 feet elevation gain, moderate length)
Services:Accessible restrooms available at Sunset Point (year-round) and available at the General Store near Sunrise Point (seasonally). Water-fill stations available at Sunset Point (seasonally), the Sunset Point restroom (year-round), and the General Store (seasonally).
Shuttle Service: Yes.
**Use the Two Bridges side of the Navajo Loop in winter when Wall Street is closed. We recommend hiking this loop in a clockwise direction.**
**Pets are not allowed on this trail**. Service animals are allowed in national parks. What is a service animal?
 Activity Fee
No
 Location
Queen's Garden Trailhead
 Due to the park's natural terrain, this is not considered an accessible trail. Surface Type:Firm Native Sediment
Total Ascent:625 feet (191 meters)
Length:2.9 mi (4.6 km) roundtrip
Typical Grade:Queen's Garden - 11.0% / Navajo - 14.0%
Maximum Grade:Queen's Garden - 25.0% / Navajo - 30.0%
Typical Cross Slope:Queen's Garden - 5.0% / Navajo - 7.0%
Maximum Cross Slope:Queen's Garden - 17.0% / Navajo - 24.0%
Typical Width: Queen's Garden - 81 inches (206 cm) / Navajo -  77 inches (196 cm)
Minimum Width:Queen's Garden - 33 inches (84 cm) / Navajo - 25 inches (64 cm) What is a service animal?
 Bryce Canyon National Park Tags bryce canyon national park
geology
hiking
hike
moderate hike
queens navajo loop trail
view point
queens garden trail
navajo loop trail
rim trail
 Related
 Hikers walk along a trail surrounded by red rock formations.More Hikes in Bryce Canyon
Learn more about hiking Bryce Canyon.
A group of people help carry a visitor out of the amphitheater on a stretcher.Hiking at High Altitudes
Bryce is a high-altitude park. Learn how to stay safe on your hike.
Two visitors board a park shuttle bus.Ride the Free Shuttle
Avoid crowded parking lots by riding the free shuttle.
 Tags bryce canyon national park
geology
hiking
hike
moderate hike
queens navajo loop trail
view point
queens garden trail
navajo loop trail
rim trail
 Last updated: January 11, 2024


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr