alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Technical Assistance Request, NRC Licensed Facilities Requesting to Name a Consultant Physicist as their Full-Time Radiation Safety Officer

## HPPOS-307 PDR-9306240030

See the memorandum from J. E. Glenn to M. M. Shanbaky dated October 18, 1990. 

This NMSS memo responds to a technical assistance request from Region I, dated July 10, 1989, regarding an amendment request from an NRC licensee who wished to name a consultant as its full-time Radiation Safety Officer (RSO). Included with the memo is a list of issues that should be addressed prior to approving a consultant as RSO. HPPOS-306 contains a related topic.

Qualified individuals, as outlined in 10 CFR 35.900, may be appointed RSO to an NRC license issued under 10 CFR 35 provided the individual commits to being physically present at the facility for a specified amount of time in order to satisfactorily perform duties of the RSO. The specific time necessary is commensurate with the requirements of the facility and must be determined on a case-by-case basis. The time commitment must be during normal working hours to provide the opportunity for interaction between the consultant and licensee management.

Clarification as to the individuals availability to respond to questions, incidents, and/or emergencies, both by telephone and on-site is needed. However it should be noted, that there will be some programs where it would be inappropriate to designate a consultant as RSO. These include programs involving radiopharmaceutical therapy, teletherapy, and large scale users of byproduct material. The licensee must agree to the above as a license commitment with the caveat that if at a later date the number of hours and days spent by the RSO at the facility or the consultant's availability are insufficient to fulfill the responsibilities required, the program will be re-evaluated and adjustments made.

Any licensee requesting to designate a consultant as RSO should be reminded that 10 CFR 35.21 (a) states "the licensee, through the RSO, shall ensure that radiation safety activities are being performed in accordance with approved procedures and regulatory requirements in the daily operation of the licensee's byproduct material program." The use of a consultant as RSO does not negate the responsibility of the licensee to ensure the safe use of byproduct material.

A list of issues that should be addressed prior to approving a consultant as RSO is included as an enclosure to the memo. These issues were derived from questions from a similar request for technical assistance by Region III. The list of issues, which was reviewed and expanded by NMSS staff, should be addressed in the review process of any request by a licensee to use a consultant as an RSO.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 35.21, 10 CFR 35.900

**Subject codes:** 1.4, 1.5

**Applicability:** All

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 30, 2017
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 104

**Question 104:**10 CFR 20.1302 provides two options for demonstrating compliance with the annual dose limit, in 10 CFR 20.1301, for members of the public. How does 10 CFR 20.1302 (b) (2), the second option, provide demonstration of compliance with the annual dose limit for members of the public who are in a controlled area?

**Answer:** It doesn't. This second option applies to members of the public in unrestricted areas and a controlled area is not an unrestricted area. However, it would be acceptable to demonstrate compliance with the annual dose limit for members of the public in a controlled area [10 CFR 20.1301 (a) and (b)] by applying the effluent concentration criteria of 10 CFR 20.1302 (b) (2) (i) and the external dose criterion of 10 CFR 20.1302 (b) (2) (ii) to the controlled area, rather than to the unrestricted area. 

(References: 10 CFR 20.1003, 10 CFR 20.1302).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 91 (Friday, May 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 27470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11181]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8319]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Impressionists on the Water''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Impressionists on the Water,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Fine Arts 
Museums of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, from on or about June 1, 
2013, until on or about October 13, 2013; the Peabody Essex Museum, 
Salem, MA, from on or about November 9, 2013, until on or about 
February 17, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet 
to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 6, 2013.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-11181 Filed 5-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 199 (Friday, October 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61223-61224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23115]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


National Security Education Board Meeting

AGENCY: National Defense University, DOD.

[[Page 61224]]


ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a 
forthcoming meeting of the National Security Education Board. The 
purpose of the meeting is to review and make recommendations to the 
Secretary concerning requirements established by the David L. Boren 
National Security Education Act, Title VIII of Public Law 102-183, as 
amended.

DATES: October 29, 2004.

ADDRESSES: The Crystal City Marriott Hotel, 1999 Jefferson Davis 
Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Edmond J. Collier, Deputy Director 
for Programs, National Security Education Program, 1101 Wilson 
Boulevard, Suite 1210, Rosslyn P.O. Box 20010, Arlington, Virginia 
22209-2248; (703) 696-1991. Electronic mail address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f4c404343464a5d4a6f414b5a014a4b5a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d1b2bebdbdb8b4a3b491bfb5a4ffb4b5a4">[email protected]</span></a>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board meeting is open to the public.

    Dated: October 8, 2004.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-23115 Filed 10-14-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
460 P.2d 73

#### Mr. and Mrs. Dan QUINTANA, Plaintiffs-in-Error, v. Salvador Andres MAEZ and Cecilia M. Maez, his wife, Defendants-in-Error.

No. 8935.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Oct. 30, 1969.

MOISE, Acting Chief Justice, and COMPTON, TACKETT and WATSON, JJ., concurring; NOBLE, Chief Justice, being absent and not participating.

Ordered that petition for writ of error be and the same is hereby denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-22534-UU

JORGE LUIS DEL TORO,

Plaintiff, 

v.

PERFORMANCE SPORTS CARS, 

INC., et al.,

Defendants. 

_______________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Chief United States Magistrate Judge John J. 

O’Sullivan’s Order Approving Settlement Agreement and Recommending that the Case Be 

Dismissed With Prejudice. D.E. 22.

THE COURT has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record and is otherwise fully 

advised in the premises. On September 30, 2020, Magistrate Judge O’Sullivan issued an order 

following the settlement conference in this case, which: (1) approved the parties’ settlement 

agreement, including attorney’s fees and costs, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 

201, et seq. (“FLSA”), pursuant to Lynn Food Stores v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352-53 

(11th Cir. 1982); and (2) recommended that the undersigned dismiss this case with prejudice, while 

retaining jurisdiction until December 14, 2020 to enforce the terms of the settlement. D.E. 22. 

The Court has made a review of the entire file and record herein and agrees with Magistrate 

Judge O’Sullivan’s recommendation. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation (D.E. 22) is

RATIFIED, AFFIRMED, and ADOPTED. It is further

Case 1:20-cv-22534-UU Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is HEREBY DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE. The Court shall retain jurisdiction until December 14, 2020 to enforce the terms of 

the settlement. It is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Clerk of Court SHALL administratively close this 

case. All future hearings are CANCELLED, and all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Miami, Florida, this 1st day of October, 2020.

__________________________________

URSULA UNGARO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished:

All counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-22534-UU Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ARAMARK Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Neubauer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    JOSEPH NEUBAUERJoseph Neubauer
No: III-23-024 December 27, 2023 

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662 

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663 

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at 

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Brian Towne as the new 

senior resident inspector at the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant. The plant, in Oak 

Harbor, Ohio, is operated by Energy Harbor. 

Towne joined the NRC in 2019 as part of the resident inspector development 

program in NRC’s Region II office. While taking part in the NRC’s training program, 

he served as the resident inspector at the Surry plant in Virginia and later as the acting 

senior resident inspector at the Beaver Valley plant in Pennsylvania. 

Prior to joining the agency, Towne served for 14 years in naval intelligence 

and analysis aboard U.S. Navy submarines and 11 years as a reservist. He also worked in the nuclear 

industry in the areas of nuclear plant operations and fire protection. 

“Brian brings extensive knowledge of nuclear engineering systems to his new position,” said Region 

III Administrator Jack Giessner. “His experience in the day-to-day operations of systems and keen 

understanding of the positions and people who operate them make him a great addition to the resident 

inspector office at Davis-Besse.”

Towne earned a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from North Carolina State University and a master’s 

degree in business administration from University of Florida. 

Each commercial nuclear power plant site in the United States has at least two resident inspectors 

who monitor day-to-day operations at the plant. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, 

conducting inspections, monitoring significant work projects and interacting with plant workers and the 

public.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22798]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-55,357]


Sanmina-Sci Corporation, Printed Ciruit Board Division, 
Wilmington, MA; Notice of Revised Determination of Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on Reconsideration

    By letter dated September 14, 2004, a duly authorized 
representative of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts requested 
administrative reconsideration regarding Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance (ATAA) for workers of the subject firm. The Trade Adjustment 
Assistance (TAA) certification for workers of Sanmina-SCI Corporation, 
Printed Circuit Board Division, Wilmington, Massachusetts was signed on 
August 13, 2004. The Department's notice will soon be published in the 
Federal Register.
    The initial investigation determined that while at least five 
percent of the workforce at the subject firm is at least fifty years of 
age, workers of the subject worker group possess skills that are easily 
transferable.
    Additional investigation has determined that the workers do not 
possess skills that are easily transferable to comparable positions 
within the local commuting area and that competitive conditions within 
the industry are adverse.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the additional facts obtained on 
reconsideration, I conclude that the requirements of Section 246 of the 
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, have been met for workers at the subject 
firm.
    In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following 
certification:

    ``All workers of at Sanmina-SCI Corporation, Printed Circuit 
Board Division, Wilmington, Massachusetts, who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after July 30, 2003 
through August 13, 2006, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also 
eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under 
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed in Washington, DC this 22nd day of September 2004.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-22798 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
Exhibit 32(i)

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The
undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-K filed by Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. (the Issuer) for the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods
presented therein.



|                     |  |                           |  |                                    
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|                     |  | Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc.
|                     |  |                          
|Date: March 28, 2006 |  | By:                       |  | /s/ James G. Graham                
|                     |  |                           |  | James G. Graham                    
|                     |  |                           |  | President & Chief Executive Officer

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-K filed by Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. (the Issuer) for
the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                     |  |                           |  |                                                 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc.
|                     |  |                          
|Date: March 28, 2006 |  | By:                       |  | /s/ David A. Godwin                             
|                     |  |                           |  | David A. Godwin                                 
|                     |  |                           |  | Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer



1
#### George A. Ohl & Company, Respondent, v. Standard Steel Sections, Inc., Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Healy Lake, Alaska Community Boundary 

Wrangell-St El',as National 

Park and. preserve Roads 

Primary 

Secondary 

s 

2.5 e-w--� 2.5 5 75 M'I

September 16, 2004 

c:\documents and settln gs\bacellariu \ \gis data \ut b oundary ma ps\utbound2.apr
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 708.87

 709.05

 709.17

 709.31

 709.56

 709.69

 709.79

 710.01

 710.13

 710.30

 710.53

 710.70

 714.92

 731.71

 745.27

 763.62

 765.39

 765.88

 766.75

 773.36

 776.41

 777.18

 777.19

 776.58

 775.76

 774.09

 778.69

 786.08

 787.22

 791.85

 797.25

 829

 834

 838

 842

 849

 852

 855

 861

 865

 870

 877

 882

 1,012

 1,649

 2,301

 3,411

 3,530

 3,563

 3,622

 4,093

 4,321

 4,380

 4,381

 4,334

 4,272

 4,147

 4,496

 5,094

 5,190

 5,591

 6,080

STORAGE

+4

+5

+4

+4

+7

+3

+3

+6

+4

+5

+7

+5

+130

+637

+652

+1,110

+119

+33

+59

+471

+228

+59

+1

-47

-62

-125

+349

+598

+96

+401

+489

CHANGE

2

3

2

2

4

2

2

3

2

3

4

3

66

326

334

565

68

32

50

267

145

60

37

26

19

30

351

476

223

377

487

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 196

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5

 5

 5

 8

 15

 20

 30

 30

 30

 36

 50

 50

 93

 175

 175

 175

 175

 44

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2002 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 15, 2003

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +5,255 3,971 196 1,121

ACRE-FEET +5,255 7,876 389 2,224

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 389

OUTLET

TOTAL

 2,224

 2,613

 825

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

Table 7
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002





The
undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-K filed by
Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. (the “Issuer”) for the year ended December 31, 2008,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained
in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the
periods presented therein.




Waccamaw
      Bankshares, Inc.Date:
      March 31, 2009
              By:
              /s/ James G. GrahamJames
      G. GrahamPresident
      & Chief Executive Officer




Certification
of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002





The
undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-K filed by
Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. (the “Issuer”) for the year ended December 31, 2008,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained
in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the
periods presented therein.





Waccamaw
      Bankshares, Inc.Date:
      March 31, 2009
              By:
              /s/ David A. GodwinDavid
      A. GodwinChief
      Financial and Principal Accounting
Officer
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-89 October 15, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

NRC ISSUES FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

RESULTING FROM CALVERT CLIFFS LICENSE RENEWAL REVIEW

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its final

environmental impact statement on the proposed renewal of the

operating licenses for the Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant in

Lusby, Md. In the report, the NRC staff concludes there are no

impacts that would preclude renewal of the license for

environmental reasons.

Baltimore Gas & Electric (BGE) Co. submitted an

application to the NRC in April 1998 to renew the licenses for

Calvert Cliffs Units 1 and 2 for another 20 years. The current

license for Unit 1 expires on July 31, 2014, Unit 2's on August

31, 2016.

As part of its review of the application, the NRC held

four meetings -- two on July 9, 1998, and two on April 6, 1999 --

regarding a draft version of the environmental impact statement

to receive comments from members of the public, local officials

and representatives of other agencies. The NRC will now submit

the final environmental impact statement to the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, which will notify interested

government agencies of its availability. Unless concerns are

raised during a 30-day period, the environmental review will be

considered completed.

A copy of the executive summary from the final

environmental impact statement is available on the NRC’s Web

site, at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports/renewal.htm

A copy of the entire report should be available at the

same location in the near future.

Following the completion of safety reviews, the NRC

expects to render a decision on the application sometime next

spring.

#
### SUBCHAPTER II—ADULT EDUCATION AND LITERACY