alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.1006 Service and filing requirements.

The provisions of § 134.204 apply to the service and filing of all pleadings and other submissions permitted under this subpart.
### §796. Reporting of court proceedings

Subject to the approval of the United States Court of Federal Claims, the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts is authorized to contract for the reporting of all proceedings had in open court, and in such contract to fix the terms and conditions under which such reporting services shall be performed, including the terms and conditions under which transcripts shall be supplied by the contractor to the court and to other persons, departments, and agencies.

(Added Pub. L. 91–272, §15(a), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 298; amended Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §121(e), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 35; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "Subject to the approval of the United States Claims Court, the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts" for "The Court of Claims".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.171 Compliance with child support obligations. Any holder of 50% or more of the ownership interest in the recipient of an SBA loan must certify that he or she is not more than 60 days delinquent on any obligation to pay child support arising under: ( a ) An administrative order;
( b ) A court order;
( c ) A repayment agreement between the holder and a custodial parent; or
( d ) A repayment agreement between the holder and a State agency providing child support enforcement services.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA parallel algorithm for the eigenvalues and eigenvectors for a general complex matrixA new parallel Jacobi-like algorithm is developed for computing the eigenvalues of a general complex matrix. Most parallel methods for this parallel typically display only linear convergence. Sequential norm-reducing algorithms also exit and they display quadratic convergence in most cases. The new algorithm is a parallel form of the norm-reducing algorithm due to Eberlein. It is proven that the asymptotic convergence rate of this algorithm is quadratic. Numerical experiments are presented which demonstrate the quadratic convergence of the algorithm and certain situations where the convergence is slow are also identified. The algorithm promises to be very competitive on a variety of parallel architectures.Document ID19920002435Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsShroff, Gautam*(Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst. Troy, NY., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1989Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:188854NASA-CR-188854RIACS-TR-89-35Accession Number92N11653Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-387CONTRACT_GRANT: N00014-86-K-0610Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920002435.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 232A/21 Σ

| | ISSN 1725-2415 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 232A |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 48ό έτος21 Σεπτεμβρίου # 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2415

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 232A

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

48ό έτος21 Σεπτεμβρίου # 2005

---

| Ανακοίνωση αριθ | Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Πληροφορίες |
| | Επιτροπή |
| 2005/C 232A/1 | Προκήρυξη θέσεως Εκτελεστικού διευθυντή της Κοινοτικής Υπηρεσίας Ελέγχου της Αλιείας (βαθμός A*14) — COM/2005/10004 | 1 |

Ανακοίνωση αριθ

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

III   Πληροφορίες

Επιτροπή

2005/C 232A/1

Προκήρυξη θέσεως Εκτελεστικού διευθυντή της Κοινοτικής Υπηρεσίας Ελέγχου της Αλιείας (βαθμός A*14) — COM/2005/10004

1

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

III Πληροφορίες

Επιτροπή

| 21.9.2005 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | CA 232/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2005

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

CA 232/1

---

ΠΡΟΚΉΡΥΞΗ ΘΈΣΕΩΣ ΕΚΤΕΛΕΣΤΙΚΟΫ ΔΙΕΥΘΥΝΤΉ ΤΗΣ ΚΟΙΝΟΤΙΚΉΣ ΥΠΗΡΕΣΊΑΣ ΕΛΈΓΧΟΥ ΤΗΣ ΑΛΙΕΊΑΣ

(Βαθμός A*14)

COM/2005/10004

(2005/C 232 Α/01)

Η Κοινοτική Υπηρεσία Ελέγχου της Αλιείας προτίθεται να διορίσει διευθυντή.

Οι υποβάλλοντες αίτηση οφείλουν να είναι υπήκοοι ενός των κρατών μελών της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.

Ο διευθυντής θα διοριστεί από το διοικητικό συμβούλιο της Υπηρεσίας από κατάλογο υποψηφίων οι οποίοι θα επιλεγούν και θα προταθούν από την Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή. Θα διοριστεί ως έκτακτος υπάλληλος στο βαθμό Α*14, σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 2 στοιχείο α) του καθεστώτος που εφαρμόζεται επί του λοιπού προσωπικού των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων, για περίοδο πέντε ετών που μπορεί να παραταθεί άπαξ για μία ακόμη περίοδο μέχρι πέντε έτη. Η Υπηρεσία και η Επιτροπή εφαρμόζουν πολιτική ίσων ευκαιριών.

Η περιγραφή καθηκόντων, το έντυπο αιτήσεως και οι οδηγίες για την υποβολή των αιτήσεων μπορούν να τηλεφορτωθούν από το Διαδίκτυο, στις ακόλουθες ηλεκτρονικές διευθύνσεις:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

ή

http://europa.eu.int/comm/fisheries/whatsnew/new_en.htm

Η προθεσμία παραλαβής των αιτήσεων λήγει στις 21 Οκτωβρίου 2005 (ως αποδεικτικό λογίζεται η σφραγίδα του ταχυδρομείου με την ημερομηνία αποστολής).

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 2:20-cv-14219-ROSENBERG/MAYNARD

FELIPE BALTAZAR, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

B. GREEN & MORE LANDSCAPING, INC. 

and BILLY M. LOPEZ 

Defendants. 

___________________________________/ 

GRANT OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the parties’ Renewed Joint Motion for Entry 

of Order Approving Settlement and Dismissing Case with Prejudice. DE 29. After careful 

consideration of the Motion and the Settlement Agreement at docket entry 29-2, as required 

under Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982), the Court 

finds that the Settlement Agreement is a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide FLSA 

dispute. 

It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties’ Renewed Joint Motion for 

Entry of Order Approving Settlement and Dismissing Case with Prejudice [DE 29] is 

GRANTED and that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court shall retain 

jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement only for a period of 30 days. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida, this 29th day of 

September, 2020. 

 _______________________________ 

 ROBIN L. ROSENBERG 

Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:20-cv-14219-RLR Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2020 Page 1 of 1
#### § 46.160 Limitations on actions during the NEPA analysis process.

During the preparation of a program or plan NEPA document, the Responsible Official may undertake any major Federal action in accordance with 40 CFR 1506.1 when that action is within the scope of, and analyzed in, an existing NEPA document supporting the current plan or program, so long as there is adequate NEPA documentation to support the individual action.
#### Alfred Miesto, Appellant, v. Commercial Union Assurance Company, Limited, of London, England, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke, and Scott, JJ.
UN IT.ED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHING T ON , D . C. 20460

MEM ORANDUM Date: 8 September 20 14 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND PbLLUTION PREV EN TI ON

S UBJECT : F lu ensulfone- Clarification of Revised Tolerance Recommend ation. PC Code: 050410 Decision No . : 464527 Petition No.: 2F8019 Ri sk Assessment Type: Single Chemical Aggregate TXRNo.: NA MRID No.: NA DP Barcode: 04226 96 Registration No .: 11 678 -TG , 66222-E UG Regulatory Action: Section 3 Case No . : None CAS No.: 318290-98- I 40 CFR: New Active lngredient FROM : Michael A. Doherty, Ph.D. , Senior Chemist

## ft.,.,~J**c:::{:;)~** Risk Assessment Branch 

### II (RAB 

### II) . Health Effects Division (HED; 7509P) THROUGH: Christina Swartz, Chief .r-. (\ · 

## A--

- RAB II

## ~~ HED (7509P) TO: Jennife r Gaines/Reuben Baris (Team 7) Insecticide / Rodenticide Branch Registration D iv ision (7505P) In a memorandum dated 4 September 2014 (0422659), HED p rovided RD with revised tolerance recommendat ions for residue s offluensulfone in/on cucurbit vegetables (Crop Group 9) and fruiting vegetables {Crop Group 8). The rev i s i on was in response to a proposed reduc tio n in . the application rate of the end use product. This memorandum is to clarify that the rev ised tol erance leve ls should be expressed in the Code of Federal Regulations to two decimal pl a ces (i . e . , 0.50 ppm) in order to ensure proper compliance.

Page 1 

### of 1
#### §§ 109.200-109.220 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, NEI Small Grants for Pilot Research Review.
    Date: November 8-9, 2004.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Double Tree Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Houmam H. Araj, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye 
Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, Bethesda, MD 20892-
9602, (301) 451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d555c4f5c577d505c545113535455135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="620a03100308220f030b0e4c0c0b0a4c050d14">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 6, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22988 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 October 2005 — Bunker & BKR v OHIM

(Case T-423/04) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Application for a Community figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘B.K.R.’ - Earlier national word mark BK RODS - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2005/C 296/48)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant(s): Bunker & BKR, SL (Almansa, Spain) (represented by: J. Astiz Suárez, lawyer)

Defendant(s): Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo, Agent,)

Other party or parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Marine Stock Ltd (Tortola, British Virgin Islands, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Application for

annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 June 2004 (Case R 0458/2002-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Bunker & BKR, SL and Marine Stock Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 314, 18.12.2004.

----
3 of 5: Coal PM Floor Spreadsheet RobertJ Wayland to: Cortney_Higgins 11/21/2011 03:49 PM Cc: Bill Maxwell

Coal_PM_Metal_Floor analysis_111811.xlsx
Document

EXHIBIT 10.19

Summary of the Terms of Verint Systems Inc. Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan


Verint Systems Inc. (the “Company”) maintains an annual bonus program (the “AIP”) for its executive officers. Under the AIP, each executive officer is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus upon the satisfaction of pre-determined performance goals, however, the Company may reserve the right to pay some or all of the bonus in shares of our common stock. The target bonus under the AIP is established annually by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Committee”) as part of the Committee’s regular compensation review process and is paid following certification by the Committee of the achievement of the underlying performance goals. In establishing target bonuses, in addition to the factors considered as part of the compensation review process generally, the Committee also considers the target bonus set forth in the executive officer’s employment agreement (if applicable), as well as special achievements, promotions, and other facts and circumstances specific to the individual officer. 


The performance goals under the AIP may be based on metrics such as revenue, bookings, a measure of profitability, and/or a measure of cash generation and may be expressed on a non-GAAP basis. In the case of executive officers with direct responsibility for a specific operating unit, unit revenue and unit profitability goals may also be incorporated into the executive officer’s performance goals. The financial performance goals established by the Committee generally come in the form of a range, wherein the executive officer may achieve a percentage of his or her target bonus at the low end of the performance range (or threshold), 100% of his target bonus towards the middle of the performance range (target performance), and up to 200% of his target bonus at the high end of the performance range.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Technical Assistance Request, Department of Interior, Anchorage, AK; Use of Temporary Radiation Safety Officer

## HPPOS-306 PDR-93062220148

See the memorandum from J. E. Glenn to R. J. Pate dated June 2, 1992. 

This NMSS memo responds to a technical assistance request from Region V, dated April 15, 1992, concerning an amendment request from an NRC licensee who wanted a former employee to remain in his position as Radiation Safety Officer (RSO), in a voluntary status, until a new RSO was hired. HPPOS-307 contains a related topic.

Qualified persons may be authorized to act as a temporary RSO provided that the individual commits to a specific amount of time on-site during which he will be available to perform his duties as RSO. Additionally, the individual must be sufficiently available to respond to questions and operational issues on an as needed or emergency basis. The licensee must verify that the temporary RSO will have the authority to properly maintain and effectively manage the radiation safety program for the licensee and that in his absence, adequate control will be maintained of the facility.

The licensee must agree to the above as a license commitment which will be amended if the conditions of time on-site, availability and control change from those described.

The commitment of time and the level of authority necessary for a temporary RSO to adequately maintain and manage a radiation safety program must be determined and approved on a case-by-case basis by the licensing reviewer. However, the licensee should be aware that it is the responsibility of the licensee, through the RSO, to ensure that the radiation safety activities are performed in accordance with approved procedures and regulatory requirements and that the use of a temporary RSO does not in any way relieve the licensee of the responsibility of ensuring the safe use of byproduct material.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 35.21, 10 CFR 35.900

**Subject codes:** 1.4, 1.5

**Applicability:** All

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 30, 2017
No: IV-23-013 December 20, 2023 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128 

NRC Proposes $28,000 Civil Penalty to XCEL NDT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $28,000 civil penalty to XCEL NDT of 

Gretna, Nebraska, for three violations of NRC security requirements associated with the use of 

radioactive materials. The company uses radioactive materials for industrial radiography to perform 

non-destructive testing of materials.

The NRC identified the apparent violations of agency requirements following an inspection 

after a company vehicle containing radioactive materials was stolen from a temporary jobsite in 

Billings, Montana, last year. The vehicle and the radioactive material were recovered that same day. 

Details of the inspection and the apparent violations were documented in an August 2023 

report. 

In October, a regulatory conference was conducted at the NRC Region IV office in 

Arlington, Texas, with company officials to discuss the apparent violations, their significance, their 

root causes, and the company’s corrective actions. The conference was closed to public observation 

because it involved security-related information. 

Based on the information developed during the inspection and provided during the 

conference, the NRC determined that three violations of NRC requirements occurred, and a civil 

penalty was warranted. 

The company has 30 days to pay the fine, dispute the fine, or request involvement from a 

neutral third-party mediator to resolve the issue.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 442

**Question 442:** Is the licensee required to advise personnel of the provisions for declaring pregnancy, who work in the controlled area, have been classified as "members of the public," and do not "work in or frequent" any restricted area?

**Answer:** No. However, it would be a good practice to do so. The provisions of 10 CFR 20.1208, for limiting dose to the embryo / fetus, apply only to declared pregnant women who receive doses from occupational exposure.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1208)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
#### In re Christine F.

*James W. Auwood,*in support of the petition.

*Judith Merrill Earl,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided April 23, 1986

The defendant mother’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 6 Conn. App. 360, is denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Neil P. Edwards, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of United Online, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the Registrant and we have:



5.     The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's
auditors and to the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: February 27, 2009

/s/ NEIL P. EDWARDS Neil P. Edwards Acting Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.1206 Notice and Order.

Upon receipt of an appeal challenging a final SBA loan review decision, OHA will assign the matter to either an Administrative Law Judge or an Administrative Judge in accordance with § 134.218. Unless the appeal is dismissed under § 134.1205, the Judge will issue a Notice and Order, utilizing the OHA Case Portal, establishing a deadline for production of the administrative record and specifying a date by which SBA may respond to the appeal.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Charles F. Dunbar for Admission to Practice as an Attorney. (From the State of Massachusetts.)

Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Mac-Crate, JJ.