alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31(iii)








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, Derek Cassell, Principal Executive Officer of Track Group, Inc.
(the “Company”), certify that:





1.
 I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Track Group,
Inc.; and





2.
 Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report.








Date: January 29, 2018
/s/ Derek Cassell

Derek Cassell
Principal Executive Officer
No: I-23-008 June 29, 2023

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC Names New Resident Inspector at Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, 

Pennsylvania, have selected Anthony Tran as the new resident inspector at the 

Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant in Lusby, Maryland. He joins NRC senior 

resident inspector Gene DiPaolo at the two-unit site operated by Constellation 

Nuclear.

Tran joined the NRC in June 2022 and, while taking part in an 

extensive inspector qualification program, has served as the acting resident 

inspector at LaSalle Generating Station in Illinois. He graduated from the 

University of California at Santa Barbara with a bachelor’s degree in 

chemical engineering. After graduation, he served in the United States Navy as a nuclear instructor 

at the Nuclear Power Training Unit in Charleston, South Carolina. 

“Anthony’s Naval experience, training and education make him a good fit at Calvert Cliffs,” 

said NRC Region I Administrator Ray Lorson. “He and Gene will work together to ensure the plant 

continues to operate safely and in accordance with our regulations.”

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as 

the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects 

and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can serve up to seven years at 

a reactor site.
No: III-23-019 July 6, 2023

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663

NRC to Hold Public Meeting to Discuss 

2022 Performance of Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss the 2022 safety performance of the Donald C. 

Cook nuclear power plant during an in-person public meeting scheduled for July 13. The two-unit plant, 

operated by Indiana Michigan Power Co., is located in Bridgman, Michigan. 

The meeting will be held at 3 p.m. Eastern time at Silver Beach Carousel, 333 Broad St. in St. 

Joseph. NRC staff responsible for plant inspection and oversight, including the resident inspectors based fulltime at the site, will participate in the discussion.

The NRC determined that D.C. Cook operated safely during 2022. All inspection findings and 

performance indicators were “green,” or very low safety significance. As a result, the plant remains under the 

NRC’s baseline level of oversight, which entails thousands of hours of inspection each year. 

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to measure 

plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, commensurate with the 

safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or performance indicators with more than very 

low safety significance trigger increased NRC oversight.

Plant inspections are performed by the two NRC onsite resident inspectors and specialist inspectors 

from the agency’s Region III office in Lisle, Ill.

The annual assessment letter for D.C. Cook is available on the NRC website. Current performance 

for Unit 1 and Unit 2 is also available and updated on a quarterly basis.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-206 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, September 27, 1999)

NRC AND UTAH CHOOSE DAMES & MOORE AS TRUSTEE

FOR ATLAS URANIUM MILL TAILINGS PILE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, with concurrence from the State of Utah, has

chosen Dames & Moore, an engineering firm with extensive uranium recovery and hazardous

waste reclamation experience, as the trustee to continue cleanup of the Atlas company’s

uranium mill tailings site in Moab, Utah.

The NRC will regulate Dames & Moore’s public health and safety activities during the

remediation of the mill tailings site.

The mill tailings pile resulted from operations of a uranium mill at the Moab site from

1956 until 1984. The facility had been owned by Atlas since 1962. Uranium is no longer

processed at the site, and the mill has been dismantled except for one building.

Under the terms of the trust agreement, the license for the site will be transferred from

Atlas to Dames & Moore. Dames & Moore will then be responsible for ongoing remediation,

using funds and other assets in the trust which were obtained as part of a reorganization for

bankruptcy agreement filed by the Atlas Company in March. The trust will contain

approximately $7-8 million, including cash, assets and payments due from the Department of

Energy for reclamation work already completed, unless further funds are appropriated by

Congress.

NRC in May approved Atlas’ reclamation plan to decommission the site, which involves

re-grading the tailings to enhance drainage off the pile and installing an earth and rock cover

system over the pile. The cover system is intended to minimize radon escape, infiltration of rain

water into the tailings, and erosion caused by surface runoff from rain or flooding of the

Colorado River.

NRC issued a draft environmental impact statement on the site in January 1996 and

held public meetings in April 1994, February 1996, and September 1998 to discuss the Atlas

company’s proposal. A final environmental impact statement was issued in March.

The latest action to transfer the license for the site will release the Atlas Corporation

from any future liability or responsibility for the cleanup of the Moab site, and avoid lengthy and

expensive litigation. The NRC will oversee administration of the trust fund.

###
HomeAbout NRCNRC COVID-19 UpdateCOVID-19 Regulatory Activities for Nuclear Reactors

# 10 CFR 50.55a Owner's Activity Reports

Nuclear Reactors COVID-19 Activities:**10 CFR Part 20** | **10 CFR Part 26** | **10 CFR 50.48** | **10 CFR 50.55a Codes & Standards | Owner's Activity Reports** | **10 CFR Part 55** | **10 CFR Part 73** | **Research & Test Reactors** | **Resident Inspectors** | **Approved Licensing Requests**

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

## Highlights

        -  The NRC's regulations [10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(xxxii)] give U.S. nuclear power plants 90 days after a refueling outage to submit an "Owner's Activity Report" (OAR-1) described in the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI. 
        -  This is an administrative reporting requirement for items from the in-service inspection that require evaluation and repair and replacement items that occurred during the refueling outage needed for continued service. 
        -  The NRC staff will consider deferrals of Form OAR-1 for up to 90 days after the COVID-19 public health emergency is ended, but in no case later than the beginning of the subsequent refueling outage, provided that alternate record retention procedures are in place during the period of deferral. 
        -  For approved COVID-19 licensing requests, please see Approved COVID-19 Licensing Actions webpage. 

## Related Communication

        -  On November 10, 2020, the NRC issued a letter to provide guidance on the continued use of expedited processes beyond December 31, 2020 for COVID-19 related requests in seven topical areas. Enclosures to the letter address informational needs for each of the seven topical areas to facilitate the continued licensee’s use of the NRC's expedited review process, such as providing justifications for the hardships that have resulted from the COVID-19 PHE and information related to the potential cumulative effects of these exemptions. 
        -  The NRC issued a letter on April 9, 2020, with requirements for an expedited review of deferral requests consistent with 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2) due to the COVID-19 public health emergency. 

## Frequently Asked Questions – 10 CFR 50.55a Owner's Activity Reports

**1. The letters imply that the staff will only consider deferral of Form OAR-1.  Can licensees also request deferral of the ISI summary report?****2.  Which Editions and Addenda of the ASME Code, Section XI, are eligible for the expedited process described in the letters?****3.  Where are the requirements to submit Form OAR‐1?  ****4.  What does 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(xxxii) require?  **

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 15, 2020
122 STAT. 734 PUBLIC LAW 110–221—MAY 7, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4454: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Feb. 28, considered and passed House. 

Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–221 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3050 

Hunsinger Lane in Louisville, Kentucky, as the ‘‘Iraq and Afghanistan Fallen 

Military Heroes of Louisville Memorial Post Office Building’’, in honor of the 

servicemen and women from Louisville, Kentucky, who died in service during 

Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN FALLEN MILITARY HEROES OF 

LOUISVILLE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 3050 Hunsinger Lane in Louisville, Kentucky, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Iraq and Afghanistan Fallen 

Military Heroes of Louisville Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Iraq and Afghanistan Fallen Military Heroes of Louisville 

Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Approved May 7, 2008. 

May 7, 2008 

[H.R. 4454] 


jbridges on POFP91QD1 with PUBLIC LAWS
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Genetic Control of Limb 
Development.
    Date: November 9, 2004.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Four Points by Sheraton Bethesda, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Gopal M. Bhatnagar, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development, National Institutes of Health, 6100 Bldg., Rm. 5B01, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 435-6889, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4d6dcd5c0dad5d3d3f4d9d5ddd89adadddc9ad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f7959f968399969090b79a969e9bd9999e9fd9909881">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: October 12, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-23339 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4853 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4853

  To require a study of the programs, acquisitions, and budget of the 
                         Department of Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 14, 2022

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mr. King) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require a study of the programs, acquisitions, and budget of the 
                         Department of Defense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Defense Programs, 
Logistics, and Acquisitions for our Nation's Security Act of 2022'' or 
the ``American Defense PLANS Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. STUDY OF THE PROGRAMS, ACQUISITIONS, AND BUDGET OF THE 
              DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into 
an arrangement with a federally funded research and development center 
under which the center will--
            (1) conduct a study of the programs, acquisitions, and 
        budget of the Department of Defense; and
            (2) make recommendations with respect to how the Department 
        can ensure that program development cycles and acquisition of 
        new technologies within the Department can best keep pace with 
        the increasing rate at which technologies acquired for programs 
        of the Department become outdated or are replaced by new 
        technologies.
    (b) Report Required.--Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report 
on the study required by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
HomeAbout NRCAlternative Dispute Resolution Programs

# NRC Participation in Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs Sponsored by Other Agencies

As encouraged by the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act, as amended (ADRA ), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) offers a variety of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Programs that may be used in lieu of litigation to resolve potential disputes. In addition, some conflicts involving the NRC may be resolved through ADR programs that are administered and controlled outside the agency. For additional information, see the following topics on this page:
            - Personnel and Labor Relations
            - Government Contracts

## Personnel and Labor Relations

            -  The Federal Labor Relations Authority uses its Settlement Judge Program to mediate conflicts between Federal agencies, unions, and employees. 
            -  The Merit Systems Protection Board provides a Mediation Appeals Program as an alternative to litigating Federal employee appeals of agency personnel actions. 
            -  The U.S. Office of Special Counsel offers a Mediation Program to help resolve complaints of prohibited personnel practices. 

## Government Contracts

            -  The U.S. Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA) recommends a variety of ADR techniques to shorten and simplify the formal proceedings that are commonly used to resolve disputes between Federal agencies and their contractors (see Rule 54 of the CBCA Rules of Procedure). 
            -  The Government Accountability Office provides several ADR programs to resolve bid protests lodged by private entities competing for government contracts (see Bid Protests at GAO: A Descriptive Guide ). 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 07, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - NRC Programs Using ADR Techniques
          - NRC Participation in ADR Programs Sponsored by Other Agencies

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Related Information

            - NRC Programs Using ADR Techniques
            - Interagency Alternative Dispute Resolution Working Group 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 07, 2020
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-127 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, June 18, 1999)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has

scheduled a joint meeting of two of its subcommittees on July 13 in Rockville, Maryland.

The subcommittees on reliability and probabilistic risk assessment and on regulatory

policies and practices will discuss proposed options for development of risk-informed revisions

to 10 CFR Part 50 of the Commission’s regulations, including proposed changes regarding

structures, systems, and components, as well as policy issues and special studies.

The meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. in room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint

Building at 11545 Rockville Pike.

Those who wish to make oral statements may notify Michael Markley, at 301-415-6885,

at least five days prior to the meeting. Mr. Markely may also be contacted with regard to

schedule changes or to obtain further information.

Other aspects of the meeting will be described in a forthcoming edition of the Federal

Register.

###
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 10, 2018 

# Order

Clerk May 10, 2018

157751 (28)

JAMES A. HALE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 157751

COA: 339831

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is

DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable

for filing fees.

Withi n 21 days of the date of this order, appellant shall pay to the Clerk of

the Court the initial partial filing fee of $12.00; submit a copy of this order; and

refile the copy of the pleadings returned with this order. Failure to comply with this

order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court.

If appellant timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments

shall be made to the Department of Corrections in the amount of 50 percent of the

deposits made to appellant’s accou nt until the payments equal the balance due of

$363.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) appellant shall not file a new civil action or appeal

in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to appellant and

return a copy of appellant’s pleadings with this order.
### **CHAPTER 26—NATIONAL CENTER FOR THE WORKPLACE**
Docket No: FAA-201-201 2-0503 

Directorate ID: 2011-SW-032-AD 

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Disposition Comments 

Next Step: k8J FRAN 0 SNPRM 

D These comments are in 

response to an SNPRM 

D No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received -lfthis box is checked, no signatures are 

required. 

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NP RM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. 

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change( s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M -8040.1 C Chapter 9. 

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: other 

lf other, explain: Interpretation of magnetic plug/Chip detector (Magnetic plug) 

Commenter(s): Fred C. Wittlake 

What change to the AD action is requested? Require the 1 0 hour inspection interval for the nonelectric magnetic plug. 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? The wording of this proposed AD in paragraph 

(d)(l) indicates that "magnetic plug/chip detector" will thereafter be written as "magnetic plug", 

and subparagraphs (i), (ii), and (iii) follow that definition. 

Paragraph ( d)(2) follows with a 10 hour inspection interval for the "magnetic plug", which now 

includes "magnetic plug/chip detector" by definition of previous paragraph. The 10 hour 

inspection of the magnetic plug should not apply to the "electrical chip detector". 

Do we agree? Yes 

If YES, we agree because the word magnetic plug/chip detector though may mean magnetic 

plug (non-electrical chip detector), but is confusing. FAA will change AD wording from " 

magnetic plug/chip detector to " magnetic plug" by deleting " /chip detector". Make the 

following changes to the AD: Delete "/chip detector" from the word "magnetic plug/chip 

detector" in paragraph ( d)(l) and in page 4. 

IfPARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don't agree because 

Page 1 of3 
ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter( s ): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

IfPARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don't agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here 

Page 2 of3 
Signature Section 

Signature indicates concurrence with this action. 

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE 

Page 3 of3 

z-s .T<.)6 L--o;-z--

Date