alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 04-112]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Education Advisory Committee (EAC).

# DATES:

Monday, October 25, 2004, 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m.; and Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Monday, October 25 at NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA, Tuesday, October 26 at Ritz Carlton, 1401 South Oak Knoll, Pasadena, CA

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Katie Blanding, Office of Education, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-0402.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the capacity of the room. All visitors must bring a driver's license or government identification to the Visitor Lobby of JPL. Foreign visitors must bring their passport, alien registration number, and their date and place of birth. Additionally, the general public will need to be escorted to the meeting room. The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics: 

—NASA Transformation Roadmapping Initiative

—Review of the Jet Propulsion Lab's (JPL) Education Program

—Transforming Education

—NASA's Integration Plan and Role of Education

—Office of Education Division Reports on: Milestones in the Educator Astronaut Program, Explorer Schools, Explorer Institutes, Science and Technology Scholarship Program, Technology & Products, Measurements, and a Single Database System.

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors to the meeting will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

R. Andrew Falcon,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 04-23039 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 01-4662



# 
D OTTIE N IXON , a/k/a Dorothy Nixon,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville.

Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge.

(CR-99-70) Submitted: April 22, 2002 Decided: May 23, 2002 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Randolph M. Lee, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Dottie Nixon appeals her sentence, imposed pursuant to a guiltyplea, for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine base within 1000 feet of a school, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, 860 (1994). Finding no error, we affirm Nixon’s sentence. Nixon contends her 360-month sentence is invalid under Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Because Nixon’s sentence is not above the forty year statutory maximum of § 860, we find Apprendi is not implicated. See United States v. Dinnall , 269 F.3d 418 (4th Cir. 2001); United States v. Promise , 255 F.3d 150 (4th Cir. 2001) (en banc), petition for cert. filed , (U.S. Sept. 20, 2001) (No. 01-6398).Nixon also contends the district court erred in calculating her sentencing guidelines range. We find no error in the district court’s determination of Nixon’s sentencing guidelines range. We therefore affirm Nixon’s sentence.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. N IXON
### Swanson, Brian (OST)

From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject: Tony Waisbrot <twaisbrot@frontier.com> Saturday, August 04, 2012 10:18 AM dennis.devaney@dot.gov Swanson, Brian (OST) air service to Rhinelander airport 

## h

Gentlemen, people who visit us in St. Germain would use the Rhinelander airport if it provided better connecting times. Thus, itwould be betterto have smaller planes connecting 4times a day ratherthan larger planes connecting or departing 2times per day even ifdaily passenger numberswere less withe the 4 connecting flights.

Jet service and connecting with Delta Airlines would be an advantage, butwould be outweighed by the forfrequent connecting times with majorairlines schedules or people fly in to CWA in Wausau forthe time and connection convenience. Thanks for accepting comments.

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of
Jefferson Savings  Bancorp, Inc. at and for the three months
ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.  Dollar  amounts (other
than per share data) are in thousands.
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                     8,779
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     14,453
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           3,765
<TRADING-ASSETS>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                236,774
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       0
<LOANS>                                    979,289
<ALLOWANCE>                                8,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1,292,021
<DEPOSITS>                                 1,076,094
<SHORT-TERM>                               87,202
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        18,419
<LONG-TERM>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   50
<OTHER-SE>                                 110,256
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             1,292,021
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            39,551
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          7,233
<INTEREST-OTHER>                           970
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           47,754
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         25,982
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         28,735
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      19,019
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              912
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                         0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            10,999
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            8,566
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 8,566
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               5,292
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.60 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.57 <F1>
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                             3.18
<LOANS-NON>                                1,609
<LOANS-PAST>                               0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                           176
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                            3,207
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           6,529
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              342
<RECOVERIES>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          8,255
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       6,963
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    1,292
<FN>
<F1>  Restated for adoption of SFAS No. 128 and two-for-one 
      stock split.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2008 of Megola,
Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Megola,
      Inc.Dated:
      June 26, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Joel GardnerJoel
      GardnerChief
      Executive Officer





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Megola, Inc. and will be
retained by Megola, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 199 (Friday, October 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 4851]


Determination Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 
Relating to the Designation of Jam'at al Tawhid wa'al-Jihad, Also Known 
as the Monotheism and Jihad Group, Also Known as the al-Zarqawi 
Network, Also Known as al-Tawhid

    Acting under the authority of section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 
of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive Order 13286 of July 2, 
2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, and in 
consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Attorney General, 
and the Secretary of Homeland Security, I hereby determine that the 
organization known as Jam'at al Tawhid wa'al-Jihad, also known as the 
Monotheism and Jihad Group, also known as the al-Zarqawi Network, also 
known as al-Tawhid, has committed, or poses a significant risk of 
committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. 
nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the 
United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectural the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice need be provided to any person subject 
to this determination who might have a constitutional presence in the 
United States because to do so would render ineffectual the measures 
authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 27, 2004.
Colin L. Powell,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 04-23174 Filed 10-14-04; 5:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
### §632. Character of service

(a) Full-time United States magistrate judges may not engage in the practice of law, and may not engage in any other business, occupation, or employment inconsistent with the expeditious, proper, and impartial performance of their duties as judicial officers.

(b) Part-time United States magistrate judges shall render such service as judicial officers as is required by law. While so serving they may engage in the practice of law, but may not serve as counsel in any criminal action in any court of the United States, nor act in any capacity that is, under such regulations as the conference may establish, inconsistent with the proper discharge of their office. Within such restrictions, they may engage in any other business, occupation, or employment which is not inconsistent with the expeditious, proper, and impartial performance of their duties as judicial officers.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 916; Pub. L. 90–578, title I, §101, Oct. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 1110; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1968—Pub. L. 90–578 substituted provisions as to character of service of full-time and part-time United States magistrates for former provisions prescribing jurisdiction and powers of national park commissioners and practice and procedure before such officers. See section 636 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States magistrate judges" substituted for "United States magistrates" wherever appearing in text pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–578 effective Oct. 17, 1968, except when a later effective date is applicable, which is the earlier of date when implementation of amendment by appointment of magistrates [now United States magistrate judges] and assumption of office takes place or third anniversary of enactment of Pub. L. 90–578 on Oct. 17, 1968, see section 403 of Pub. L. 90–578, set out as a note under section 631 of this title.
### Part D—Federal and Fiscal Administrative Provisions
No: I-23-017 December 20, 2023 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector

at Susquehanna Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Jennifer England 

as the new senior resident inspector at the Susquehanna nuclear power plant 

in Salem Township, Pennsylvania. 

“Jennifer England embarks on this new role equipped with a deep 

and diverse background at the NRC, in the private sector and in the Navy 

nuclear program,” said NRC Region I Administrator Ray Lorson. “We look 

forward to her service in ensuring safety at Susquehanna.” 

England joined the NRC in 2019 as a reactor engineer in the Division of Reactor Projects in 

the NRC’s Region I Office in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, she has served as the resident 

inspector at the James A. FitzPatrick nuclear plant in New York. She earlier served as a resident 

inspector at the Indian Point nuclear plant in New York. 

She has also worked as a quality assurance manager for several manufacturing companies on 

products such as pressure transducers, valves, hardware and fasteners, and as a nuclear plant 

engineer in the Naval Nuclear Power Program at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory. 

England holds a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from Rutgers University. 

Each operating U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident 

inspectors who serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, 

monitoring safety-significant projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. She joins 

resident inspector Erin Brady at the two-unit site, which is operated by Talen Energy. Resident 

inspectors can serve at a reactor site for up to seven years.
Opinion issued February 11, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00555-CR

———————————

ELBIS CORTES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1615818

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Elbis Cortes, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion 

to dismiss complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and no prior 

decisions have issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a), (b). Accordingly, we grant the 

motion and dismiss the appeal. We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Guerra.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
----

----

I Teave

Komisjon

----

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

31. jaanuar 2006

(2006/C 25/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

----

----

Liikmesriikide esitatav teave riigiabi kohta, mida antakse kooskõlas 12. jaanuari 2001. aasta määrusega (EÜ) nr 68/2001, mis käsitleb EÜ asutamislepingu artiklite 87 ja 88 kohaldamist koolitusabi suhtes ning mida on muudetud 25. veebruari 2004. aasta määrusega (EÜ) nr 363/2004

(2006/C 25/02)

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

----

----

Eelteatis koondumise kohta

(juhtum nr COMP/ M.4094 — INEOS/BP Dormagen

(2006/C 25/03)

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

----

(1)ELT L 24, 29.1.2004, lk 1.

----

----

Eelteatis koondumise kohta

(juhtum nr COMP/M.4118 — CVC/KKR/AVR)

Juhtumi puhul võidakse rakendada lihtsustatud korda

(2006/C 25/04)

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

----

(1)ELT L 24, 29.1.2004, lk 1.

(2)ELT C 56, 5.3.2005, lk 32.

----

----

Teatatud koondumise aktsepteering

(Toimik nr COMP/M.3642 — Carlyle/Advent/HT Troplast JV)

(2006/C 25/05)

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

22. detsembil 2004 otsustas komisjon mitte vastu seista ülalmainitud koondumisele ning kuulutada see vastavaks ühisturu nõuetega. Käesolev otsus on tehtud nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 139/2004 artikli 6(1)(b) alusel. Täielik otsuse tekst on kättesaadav vaid inglise ning avaldatakse peale seda kui dokumendist on kustutatud kõik võimalikud ärisaladused. Otsus on kättesaadav:

----

----

Teatatud koondumise aktsepteering

(Toimik nr COMP/M.4075 — Providence/Carlyle/Com Hem)

(2006/C 25/06)

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

25. jaanuaril 2006 otsustas komisjon mitte vastu seista ülalmainitud koondumisele ning kuulutada see vastavaks ühisturu nõuetega. Käesolev otsus on tehtud nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 139/2004 artikli 6(1)(b) alusel. Täielik otsuse tekst on kättesaadav vaid inglise ning avaldatakse peale seda kui dokumendist on kustutatud kõik võimalikud ärisaladused. Otsus on kättesaadav:

----

----

Teatatud koondumise aktsepteering

(Toimik nr COMP/M.4002 — OMV/ARAL CR)

(2006/C 25/07)

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

21. detsembril 2005 otsustas komisjon mitte vastu seista ülalmainitud koondumisele ning kuulutada see vastavaks ühisturu nõuetega. Käesolev otsus on tehtud nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 139/2004 artikli 6(1)(b) alusel. Täielik otsuse tekst on kättesaadav vaid inglise ning avaldatakse peale seda kui dokumendist on kustutatud kõik võimalikud ärisaladused. Otsus on kättesaadav:

----

----

Teatatud koondumise aktsepteering

(Toimik nr COMP/M.3349 — Toshiba/Samsung/JV)

(2006/C 25/08)

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

2. märtsil 2004 otsustas komisjon mitte vastu seista ülalmainitud koondumisele ning kuulutada see vastavaks ühisturu nõuetega. Käesolev otsus on tehtud nõukogu määruse (EMÜ) nr 4064/89 artikli 6(1)(b) alusel. Täielik otsuse tekst on kättesaadav vaid inglise ning avaldatakse peale seda kui dokumendist on kustutatud kõik võimalikud ärisaladused. Otsus on kättesaadav:

----
#### Paul J. Aparo, Administrator (Estate of Steven J. Palmieri) *v.*United Technologies Corporation et al.

*Wesley W. Horton,*in support of the petition.

*James E. Kernan,*in opposition.

Decided April 23, 1986

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 6 Conn. App. 60, is denied.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION

Case No. 0:20-cv-61249-WPD

JHON SARMIENTO, Individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SCHEAR CONSTRUCTION, LLC, a

Florida Limited Liability Company,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

THIRD JOINT STATUS UPDATE

Plaintiff, Jhon Sarmiento, on behalf of himself and all Opt-In Plaintiffs (collectively, 

“Plaintiffs”), and Defendant, Schear Construction, LLC (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”),

respectfully submit the following status update:

The Parties have reached a negotiated settlement of the case and are currently working to 

finalize the settlement documents, with the intention of filing a motion for approval within the next 

30 days.

[Remainder of page intentionally blank]

Case 0:20-cv-61249-WPD Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted this 1st day of June, 2022.

By: /s/ Andrew R. Frisch

Andrew R. Frisch, Esquire 

Florida Bar No. 27777

afrisch@forthepeople.com 

Morgan & Morgan, P.A.

8151 Peters Road, Suite 4000 

Plantation, FL 33324.

Attorney for Plaintiffs

By: /s/ Jesse I. Unruh

Jesse I. Unruh, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 93121 

SPIRE LAW, LLC

jesse@spirelawfirm.com

sarah@spirelawfirm.com 

Attorney for Defendant | Schear Construction, 

LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 1st day of June, 2022., the foregoing was electronically filed 

with the Court by using the Southern District of Florida’s CM/ECF portal, which will send a notice 

of electronic filing to all parties of records.

/s/ Andrew R. Frisch

Andrew R. Frisch, Esquire 

Case 0:20-cv-61249-WPD Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 2 of 2
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
**287 CAF 10-01090**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF KAYLIN C., KRISTEN C., AND KORINA C.

--------------------------------------------- WYOMING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ORDER PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; AMANDA W., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

ERICKSON WEBB SCOLTON & HAJDU, LAKEWOOD (LYLE T. HAJDU OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. ERIC T. DADD, COUNTY ATTORNEY, WARSAW (JAMIE B. WELCH OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. TERESA KOWALCZYK, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, WARSAW, FOR KAYLIN C., KRISTEN C., AND KORINA C.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Wyoming County (Michael F. Griffith, J.), entered April 26, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order terminated respondent’s parental rights and granted petitioner custody and guardianship of the subject children. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: March 25, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court