alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Construction of the Will of Fenton M. Smith, Deceased. James S. Smith et al., Appellants-Respondents; Fenton G. Smith, Respondent-Appellant.

In our opinion the resettled decree construing the “ Fifth ” paragraph of the will as vesting the residuary estate in James S. Smith, subject to and charged with the payment of the reasonable, proper and comfortable support, maintenance and care of testator’s son, Fenton G. Smith, is in conformity with the intent of the testator as expressed in the will *(Matter of Forde,*286 N. Y. 125, 128; *Meeks*v. *Meeks,*161 N. Y. 66, 70; *Fell*v. *McCready,*236 App. Div. 390, 395, affd. 263 N. Y. 602; *Matter of Nelson,*268 N. Y. 255, 258); and that the amount of such cost of support so to be charged may properly be determined by trial before the Surrogate, as directed by the decree. (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 40; *Matter of Buehler,*186 Misc. 306, 309, affd. 272 App. Div. 757, same case 274 App. Div. 770.) Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ.
Exhibit
      23




Crescent




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




To
      the
      Board of Directors and Shareholders


Crescent
      Financial Corporation and Subsidiary


Cary,
      North Carolina




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
      333-137235 filed as of September 11, 2006; 333-136522 filed as of August 11,
      2006; 333-126871 filed as of July 25, 2005; 333-108456 filed as of September
      3,
      2003; 333-68974 and 333-68990 both filed as of September 5, 2001) on Forms
      S-8
      of Crescent
      Financial Corporation and Subsidiary (the “Company”) of
      our
      report dated March 10, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial
      statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
      which reports appear in the
      Company’s 2007
      Annual Report on Form 10-K.




Crescent


*Raleigh,
      North Carolina*


*March
      10, 2008*
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.902 Standing. ( a ) A Size Standard Petition may be filed with OHA by any person that is adversely affected by the Administrator's decision to revise, modify, or establish a size standard.
( b ) A business entity is not adversely affected unless it conducts business in the industry associated with the size standard that is being challenged and: ( 1 ) The business entity qualified as a small business concern before the size standard was revised or modified; or
( 2 ) The business entity qualifies as a small business under the size standard as revised or modified.
§ 49.40 May the bureaus restrict access to an area? ( a ) The Federal land manager may restrict access to an area or close areas to collection of paleontological resources to protect paleontological or other resources or to provide for public safety.
( b ) The regulations in this part do not preclude the use of other authorities that provide for area restrictions or closures on Federal land.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 200 (Monday, October 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22978]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Call for Redemption: 11\3/4\ Percent Treasury Bonds of 
2005-10; Washington, DC

October 15, 2004.
    1. Public notice is hereby given that all outstanding 11\3/4\ 
percent Treasury Bonds of 2005-10 (CUSIP No. 912810 CM 8) dated 
February 15, 1980, due February 15, 2010, are hereby called for 
redemption at par on February 15, 2005, on which date interest on such 
bonds will cease.
    2. Full information regarding the presentation and surrender of 
such bonds held in coupon and registered form for redemption under this 
call will be found in Department of the Treasury Circular No. 300 dated 
March 4, 1973, as amended (31 CFR part 306), and from the Definitives 
Section of the Bureau of the Public Debt (telephone (304) 480-7936), 
and on the Bureau of the Public Debt's Web site, http//
www.publicdebt.treas.gov.
    3. Redemption payments for such bonds held in book-entry form, 
whether on the books of the Federal Reserve Banks or in Treasury-Direct 
accounts, will be made automatically on February 15, 2005.

Donald V. Hammond,
Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-22978 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-40-M
Date:

California Environmental Protection Agency

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Enclosure A

Rules that were Adopted and Amended by the Following

Air Pollution Control and Air Quality Management Districts

and are Submitted as Revisions to the

State of California Implementation Plan for Achieving

and Maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards

District

Rule

Number

Date Adopted 

or 

Amended

Title

Antelope Valley 

AQMD

701 04/15/14 Air Pollution Emergency 

Contingency Actions

(amended)

Butte County 

AQMD

101 04/24/14 Definitions (amended)

Butte County 

AQMD

400 04/24/14 Permit Requirements 

(amended)

Butte County 

AQMD

401 04/24/14 Permit Exemptions 

(amended)

Butte County 

AQMD

432 04/24/14 Federal New Source Review 

(amended)

Butte County 

AQMD

433 04/24/14 Rice Straw Emission 

Reduction Credits (amended)
California Environmental Protection Agency

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Enclosure A (continued)

Rules that were Adopted, Amended, or Rescinded by the Following

Air Pollution Control and Air Quality Management Districts

and are Submitted As Revisions to the

State of California Implementation Plan for Achieving

and Maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards

District

Rule

Number

Date Adopted 

or Amended Title

Feather River 

AQMD

3.15 08/04/14 Architectural Coatings 

(amended)

Feather River 

AQMD

3.22 10/06/2014 Stationary Internal 

Combustion Engines 

(amended)

Feather River 

AQMD

3.8 06/02/14 Gasoline Dispensing Facilities 

(amended)

Feather River 

AQMD

10.1 10/06/2014 New Source Review 

(amended)

Feather River 

AQMD

10.9 10/06/2014 Rice Straw Emission 

Reduction Credits and 

Banking 

(amended)

2
California Environmental Protection Agency

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Enclosure A (continued)

Rules that were Adopted, Amended, or Rescinded by the Following

Air Pollution Control and Air Quality Management Districts

and are Submitted As Revisions to the

State of California Implementation Plan for Achieving

and Maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards

District

Rule

Number

Date Adopted 

or Amended Title

Great Basin 

Unified APCD

431 12/20/13 Particulate Emissions 

(amended)

Mojave Desert 

AQMD

464 06/23/14 Oil-Water Separators 

(amended)

San Joaquin Valley 

APCD

4901 09/18/2014 Wood Burning Fireplaces and 

Wood Burning Heaters 

(amended)

San Luis Obispo 

County APCD

222 05/28/14 Federal Emission Statement 

(adopted)

Santa Barbara 

County APCD

323.1 6/19/14 Architectural Coatings 

(adopted)

3
California Environmental Protection Agency

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Enclosure A (continued)

Rules that were Adopted, Amended, or Rescinded by the Following

Air Pollution Control and Air Quality Management Districts

and are Submitted As Revisions to the

State of California Implementation Plan for Achieving

and Maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards

District

Rule

Number

Date Adopted 

or Amended Title

South Coast AQMD 1130 5/2/14 Graphic Arts (amended)

4
§ 15.12 Photographs and other depictions. ( a ) *Photographs and other depictions at Mt. Weather.* We prohibit taking photographs and making notes, sketches, or diagrams of buildings, grounds or other features of Mt. Weather, or the possession of a camera while at Mt. Weather except when the Administrator or Mt. Weather Executive Director approves in advance.
( b ) *Photographs and other depictions at the NETC.* ( 1 ) Photographs may be taken inside classroom or office areas of the NETC only with the consent of the occupants. Except where security regulations apply or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it, photographs may be taken in entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings.
( 2 ) Subject to the foregoing prohibitions, photographs for advertising and commercial purposes may be taken only with written permission of the Director of Management Operations and Systems Support, United States Fire Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emmitsburg, MD 21727, (telephone) (301) 447-1223, (facsimile) (301) 447-1052, or other authorized official where photographs are to be taken.
§ 500.105 Staff. ( a ) *Executive Director.* The Executive Director of the Board advises and assists the Board in carrying out its responsibilities under the Act, provides general direction with respect to the administration of the Board's actions, directs the activities of the staff, and performs such other duties as the Board may require.
( b ) *General Counsel.* The General Counsel of the Board provides legal advice relating to the responsibilities of the Board and performs such other duties as the Board may require.
( c ) *Secretary of the Board.* The Secretary of the Board sends notice of all meetings, prepares minutes of all meetings, maintains a complete record of all votes and actions taken by the Board, has custody of all records of the Board and performs such other duties as the Board may require.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# NRC's Jurisdiction at U.S. Armed Forces Bases Abroad

## HPPOS-199 PDR-9111210334

See the memorandum from T. F. Dorian to V. Miller dated July 16, 1985.

The NRC has both territorial and personal jurisdiction at U.S. armed forces bases in foreign countries. At these bases, NRC personal jurisdiction applies but may conflict with the regulations of the host country and is not normally exercised.

The NRC has both territorial and personal jurisdiction at U.S. armed forces bases abroad. Normally, the NRC's territorial jurisdiction is limited to the licensing and regulation of special, source, and byproduct nuclear material within the geographical limits of the U.S. and its trust territories and possessions. This type of jurisdiction ceases when a person exports nuclear material outside U.S. territorial limits (i.e., the person sends or takes the material past U.S. customs).

The NRC's personal jurisdiction is not limited in this manner. Personal jurisdiction travels with a U.S. person, whether as an individual licensee or the entire U.S. Army as a licensee, wherever that person may be using nuclear materials - in the U.S., neutral territories, on the high seas, abroad, or in space. As a legal matter, NRC has no problem regulating U.S. persons when they use nuclear materials in the U.S. or in such areas as Antarctica, Puerto Rico, on the high seas, or in space. It does run into a problem, though, when it attempts to regulate U.S. persons using nuclear materials within the geographical jurisdiction of another country. 

The problem arises because NRC's jurisdiction over a U.S. person using nuclear materials in another country may conflict with that country's jurisdiction. The NRC has solved this possible conflict of laws in the same manner for private persons and for public persons such as the armed forces. For individuals, the NRC policy has been to exert its jurisdiction only until they reach the geographical jurisdiction or the customs area of another country. For the armed forces using nuclear materials at U.S. bases around the world without having exported these materials, it has had to temper this policy. U.S. armed forces bases abroad are considered part of the U.S. for the purpose of carrying out U.S. laws; however, they also are part of the territory of the country in which they are located. Consequently, the rights and responsibilities of both the U.S. and the host country are spelled out in treaties and other documents. To avoid any conflict with other countries or with the armed forces, NRC's policy has been that it will not exercise its jurisdiction, personal or territorial, as long as the armed forces use their own internal permit systems.

**Regulatory references:** Atomic Energy Act, License Conditions

**Subject codes:** 11.3, 12.7, 12.9

**Applicability:** Byproduct Material

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 17, 2017
§ 128.201 What other eligibility requirements apply for certification as a VOSB or SDVOSB? ( a ) *Suspension and debarment.* ( 1 ) In order to be eligible for VOSB or SDVOSB certification and to remain certified, the concern and any of its owners must not have an active exclusion in SAM.
( 2 ) An Applicant or Participant must immediately notify SBA of any active exclusion.
( 3 ) If, after certifying a Participant, SBA discovers that a firm has been suspended from Federal Government contracting, SBA will propose the firm for decertification pursuant to § 128.310.
( 4 ) If, after certifying a Participant, SBA discovers that a firm has been debarred from federal government contracting, SBA will remove the Participant from the certification database immediately, notwithstanding the provisions of § 128.310.
( b ) *Financial obligations.* An Applicant is not eligible for certification as a VOSB or SDVOSB if the concern, or any of the principals, fail to pay significant financial obligations owed to the Federal Government, including unresolved tax liens and defaults on Federal loans, or other government-assisted financing. An Applicant may become eligible for certification as a VOSB or SDVOSB if the firm or the affected principals can demonstrate that the financial obligations owed have been settled, discharged, or forgiven by the Federal Government. If, after certifying a Participant, SBA discovers that the Participant or any principals have failed to pay significant financial obligations owed to the Federal Government, SBA will initiate proceedings to decertify the Participant and remove it from the certification database pursuant to § 128.310.
[87 FR 73412, Nov. 29, 2022, as amended at 88 FR 26216, Apr. 27, 2023]
Exhibit 10.27





January 29, 2004

                               Lyons Capital, LLP
                               Nutech Digital Inc.
                              Consulting Agreement

Nutech Digital Inc will engage Lyons Capital, LLP to raise $500,000.00 best
efforts. The investor(s) will receive common shares issued at $0.40 per share
and two warrants to purchase common shares at $0.75. Upon the closing date and
from the closing proceeds, Lyons Capital, LLP shall receive cash compensation
equal to 10% of the gross proceeds. The closing date will be on or before
February 4, 2004.


Lyons Capital, LLP                        Nutech Digital Inc.



By:___________________________            By:__________________________
      Authorized Officer                         Lee Kasper
                                             President and Chief Executive
                                                Officer

















         7900 Gloria Avenue, Van Nuys, California 91406 Ph:818-994-3831
                  Fax: 818-994-1575 E-Mail: info@nutechdvd.com
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6128

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL A. SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-96-58, CA-99-135-7)

Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 21, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1999),

and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Smith, Nos. CR-96-58; CA-99-135-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 1999; Dec.

14, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §568. Practice of law prohibited

A United States marshal or deputy marshal may not practice law in any court of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(c), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 621, §575; renumbered §568, Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7608(a)(2)(B), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4514.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 28 U.S.C. 556. | [None]. |

Statutes at Large

The words "may not" are substituted for "shall not".

#### 1948 Act

Prior section 556.—Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§395 and 396 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§273, 274, 36 Stat. 1164).

Section consolidates parts of sections 395 and 396 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Similar provisions in said sections, relating to clerks, are incorporated in section 955 of this title.

The revised section substitutes, as simpler and more appropriate, the prohibition against practice of law "in any court of the United States" for the more involved language of section 395 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which provided that no clerks or marshals, deputies, or assistants within the district for which appointed "shall act as solicitor, proctor, attorney or counsel, in any cause depending in any of said courts, or in any district for which he is acting as such officer."

Provisions of section 396 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., for striking the name of an offender from the roll of attorneys and for recommendation of dismissal, were omitted as unnecessary and as covered by section 541 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 568, added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(c), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 620, related to availability of appropriations for transfer of prisoners to narcotic farms, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–690, §7608(a)(1).

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–690 renumbered section 575 of this title as this section.
### §587. Salaries

Subject to sections 5315 through 5317 of title 5, the Attorney General shall fix the annual salaries of United States trustees and assistant United States trustees at rates of compensation not in excess of the rate of basic compensation provided for Executive Level IV of the Executive Schedule set forth in section 5315 of title 5, United States Code.

(Added Pub. L. 95–598, title II, §224(a), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2664; amended Pub. L. 99–554, title I, §114(a), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3093.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 408(c) of Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, which provided for the repeal of this section and the deletion of any references to United States Trustees in this title at a prospective date, was repealed by section 307(b) of Pub. L. 99–554. See note set out preceding section 581 of this title.

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–554 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "The Attorney General shall fix the annual salaries of United States trustees and assistant United States trustees at rates of compensation not to exceed the lowest annual rate of basic pay in effect for grade GS–16 of the General Schedule prescribed under section 5332 of title 5."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–554 effective 30 days after Oct. 27, 1986, see section 302(a) of Pub. L. 99–554, set out as a note under section 581 of this title.
. -)

AY,Q (Rzv.06/12)SummonainaCivilAction

- - - -.

'-- - .0

U D STA'IESDISTRICT COURT

forthe

'-gi>vyv'a-too'

Ptaintfla)

CivilAdionNo,

Ntwaft2=>>du'rztvzzq'pKçto e.lk:

G 'QV. XCXXO YSJ

SUM O NS IN A CTVELACTION

To:lDejèndant'z= e=dJZA J' N ** R6 kk-:.x

&

*tX* 5'

.

< uTu txazoh -w lx-m.t.b,+ %2= î

w qhf>,T-x.'+Fz6z

A lawsuithasbeen fledagqim!rfyuu.

W7thin21daysaAerserviceoftlniasurnmonsonycu(notcountingthedayyoureceivedit)- or60daysifyou

aretheUnited StxleuoraUnitedSàtesagency,oracoc cerorem ployeeoftheUnitedStcesdescribed i'nFed.R.Civ.

P.12(a)(2)or(3)- yQumustserveontheplaintiffarians'wertothenenchedcomplainloramotiontmderRule12of

theFedee RuleoofCivilProcedure.n eanswerormotionm usrtbeaervedontheplaintifforplaindfrsatorney,

whosenameandaddres;are:

61:?tl:u na,(.z'u.=

r)..s. s4k lj.

x v'au'.fi:K.,y'-tl.sz kxg

Ifyouraizloresporx judm estbydefauz4u1beunteredagainstyouorthereliefdernsndedintlwcomplain.s

Youalsomusrtfleyom'answercrmokonwiththecomt

CS OF CoEJRT

Date:

Signak eo/cldrkcrDepur.pClqrk

Case 1:20-cv-22588-KMW Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 1 of 2
AO440t% .,.067.12)imvnashlzCM AcionWv 2)

Cl'vû A cucnNo.18-25238 '

PROOF 0F O W CE

P isJ>r#MnshouldM tbep .dMzfzthzd/rflr-lpqsr/glired#.FFM X.CiM.P.4(W

'

'IH smmrnvnonsforln= c/fpavfufuaapàflfly> ; .

D Ipersox ysv edie=7= 0= ontkehdividcalat(placa) .

c.1ld&a) ;Qr

o Ilee iemavv= azieidividual'sresidenceorxnmnslplaceofabodewit (.= e)

apersonof=7'im>leage'= ddiscreticnwboreidestEezeo

on(d* l ,O d=53* 2.COW toteZW ILY'Slast.W OWDNddress;W

D 1sG ediemw'n'rnocsonln= (y'' '. ,* 0is

designatedbylawtoacceptse ceof#ocesaorbekalfofl= ac//rgzprfaïonl

0n(d&a) ;Of

D Ire nrnedie.== cnsunexecutedbecause . ;Or

ID Oierlgechl..

M yfeesa':e$ fort-avela'ad$ forservices,foratotalof$ c.oo .

1declareuuderpenaltyofpeljtzry+st% infovnMonisH e.

. . JW R lJA* 6

'rlne v œ ce elz

' Jerper'znrl- ra '

Addifionalm'fo= ationregardhgu emptqdterdce,e'tc:

Case 1:20-cv-22588-KMW Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Benito Serego, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York,- Borough of Queens, convicting him of a violation of section 1140 of the Penal Law and fining him $250 or to serve sixty days in City Prison and, in addition, sixty days in the Workhouse, execution of which latter portion of the sentence is suspended during good behavior. Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — : Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.