alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2014

t0519

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2014

148523

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148523

COA: 306188 

Wayne CC: 11-002412-FC

ROYALE LAMPTON IRVIN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5078 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5078

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 123 East Main Street in Vergas, Minnesota, as the ``Jon Glawe Post 
                               Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 14, 2022

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Ms. Smith) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 123 East Main Street in Vergas, Minnesota, as the ``Jon Glawe Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JON GLAWE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 123 East Main Street in Vergas, Minnesota, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Jon Glawe Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jon Glawe 
Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 Date: May 8, 2008
    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR
WILLIAMS COAL SEAM GAS ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
    /s/ RON E. HOOPERRon E. HooperSenior Vice President and Administrator
Bank of America, N.A.
c..__..-.---.,./\!Yl 1IIO I '--( ..:.---r:--~ 

' 

red-winged /4// \( 

blackbird / / 

. I\ 11 / \ \ I I/ 

Yosemite National Park
### §§58 to 60. Repealed. Mar. 22, 1933, ch. 4, §2, 48 Stat. 17

Section 58, act Oct. 28, 1919, ch. 85, title II, §37, 41 Stat. 318, related to development of liquids containing less than one-half of one per centum of alcohol.

Section 59, act Oct. 28, 1919, ch. 85, title II, §37, 41 Stat. 318, related to tax on fortified wines for nonbeverage alcohol.

Section 60, act Oct. 28, 1919, ch. 85, title II, §37, 41 Stat. 318, related to burden of proof with regard to alcoholic content.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Accenture SCA (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael G. McGrath,
Chief Financial Officer of Accenture Ltd, the general partner of the Company
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ Michael G. McGrathMichael G. McGrathChief Financial Officer of Accenture LtdNovember 4, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### § 147.610 Controlled substance.

*Controlled substance* means a controlled substance in schedules I through V of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812), and as further defined by regulation at 21 CFR 1308.11 through 1308.15.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Travel Route 66
### 72273 

# Corrections

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY contains editorial corrections of previously published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule, and Notice documents. These corrections are prepared by the Office of the Federal Register. Agency prepared corrections are issued as signed documents and appear in the appropriate document categories elsewhere in the issue.



### DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army Performance Review Boards Membership Correction In notice document 02-29882 beginning on page 70584 in the issue of Monday, November 25, 2002, make the following correction: On page 70585, in the first column, after paragraph (b), in item number 3, in the first line, "Dr. C.I. Change" should read, "Dr. C.I. Chang". [FR Doc. C2-29882 Filed 12-3-02; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1505-01-D 

### Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 10 CFR Part 431 [Docket No. EE-RM-96-400] RIN 1904-AB11 Energy Efficiency Program for Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Extension of Time for Electric Motor Manufacturers To Certify Compliance With Energy Efficiency Standards Correction In rule document 02-29969 beginning on page 70677 in the issue of Tuesday, November 26, 2002, make the following correction: § 431.123 [Corrected] On page 70678, in the first column, in § 431.123, in paragraph (g), in the third line, "February 28, 2003" should read, "April 30, 2003". [FR Doc. C2-29969 Filed 12-3-02; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1505-01-D Federal Register Vol. 67, No. 233 Wednesday, December 4, 2002



### DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1 [TD 9020]

RIN 1545-BB19 Substantiation of Incidental Expenses Correction In rule document 02-28543 beginning on page 68512 in the issue of Tuesday, November 12, 2002 make the following correction: § 1.274-5T [Corrected] On page 68513, in the second column, in §1.274-5T, in paragraph (j)(1) and (2), in the second line, "see" should read, "see". [FR Doc. C2-28543 Filed 12-3-02; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.616 How will I know if I receive an award?

The ALJ will issue an initial decision on the merits of your request for an award which will become final in 30 days unless a request for review is filed under § 134.228. The decision will include findings on your eligibility, on whether SBA's position was substantially justified, and on the reasonableness of the amount you requested. Where applicable, there will also be findings on whether you have unduly protracted the proceedings or whether other circumstances make an award unjust, and an explanation of the reason for the difference, if any, between the amount requested and the amount awarded. If you have sought an award against more than one federal agency, the decision will allocate responsibility for payment among the agencies with appropriate explanation.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Thomas Stone
National Historic Site
Maryland


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Weather
 Stables and LandscapeThomas Stone National Historic Site outbuildings and landscape. NPS image/Girimont
In the 1700s, Thomas Stone purchased several tracts of land totaling over 440 acres, with the most significant being the tract of Haberdeventure. A rough Latin translation of Haberdeventure is "dwelling place of the winds." It was first documented as the name of the property circa 1682, soon after the first recorded owner John Bearfoot (or Barefoot) purchased it. If you visit the site today, you will notice the house resting on a small rise, where you might feel the cooling breezes from the nearby Port Tobacco River.
**Climate**
Thomas Stone National Historic Site experiences all four seasons. Spring often brings a wide range of temperatures and conditions, ranging from cool and rainy days in the 50s and 60s to warm, sunny days in the 70s and 80s. Summers tend to be hot and humid, with occasional thunderstorms and rainy days. Autumn brings cooler temperatures but is mostly dry. Winters are mild but can bring snow and colder temperatures. Thomas Stone National Historic Site usually has some wind, ranging from a refreshing summer breeze to chilly winter winds.
**Weather Forecast**

Loading weather forecast...

National Weather Service Icon
Hazardous Weather Conditions
Lat: **38.5413973742276** Long: **-76.8572064381347**
Last updated:
Current Conditions
**Humidity**	**Wind Speed**	**Barometer**	**Dewpoint**	**Visibility**
**Wind Chill**
More Weather Information on Weather.gov
Extended Graphical Forecast for This Location
Extended Text Forecast for This Location
 Last updated: August 27, 2021
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 6655 Rose Hill Road
Port Tobacco,
MD
20677
 Phone: 804-224-1732
x227 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
§ 130.600 Cooperative agreement. ( a ) *Cooperative agreement provisions.* A recipient organization will incorporate into its SBDC sub-agreements and contracts the provisions of the cooperative agreement.
( b ) *Sub-agreements.* SBA reserves the right to disapprove any sub-agreement entered into by recipient organizations with SBDC service center organizations, vendors, or contractors.
( c ) *Goals and milestones.* ( 1 ) The AA/SBDC or designee will develop performance measurements for SBDC networks and include provisions for their achievement in the cooperative agreement.
( 2 ) The AA/SBDC or designee will negotiate with the designated association and Lead Center to establish the annual goals, milestones, and activities for the cooperative agreement.
( 3 ) Failure to meet the goals and milestones of the cooperative agreement may be considered in part of the determination for suspension, termination, or non-renewal in accordance with the dispute resolution procedures set forth in § 130.630.
( 4 ) Agency loan goals may not be negotiated or incorporated into the cooperative agreement without the prior written approval of the AA/SBDC.
( d ) *Procurement policies and procedures.* ( 1 ) Contracts and sub-agreements supported with funds provided under the cooperative agreement must comply with the procurement procedures of the recipient organization.
( 2 ) Contracting procedures must encourage open competition among qualified vendors and promote the effective, efficient, and responsible use of program resources and OMB guidance.
( 3 ) Contracting procedures should provide for domestic sourcing preferences to the greatest extent practicable, showing preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States.
[88 FR 76647, Nov. 7, 2023]
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

         We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated financial statements of
Skynet Telematics.com, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2000 and for the
Three months and six months then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the company's management.

         Another accountant reviewed the interim consolidated financial
information of Netking Limited and Subsidiary and Skamp International Limited
and Subsidiary, subsidiaries of the Company, whose combined total assets as of
June 30, 2000 and whose revenues for the six-months then ended which constituted
substantially all of the consolidated totals.

         We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

         Based on our review and the report of the other accountant, we are not
aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying
consolidated financial statements for them to be in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.



August 10, 2000                         By: /s/ Most Horowitz & Company, LLP
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Most Horowitz & Company, LLP






                                      -14-
§ 142.31 Can a party request reconsideration of the initial decision? ( a ) Any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the initial decision with the ALJ within 20 days of receipt of the initial decision. If the initial decision was served by mail, there is a rebuttable presumption that the initial decision was received by the party 5 days from the date of mailing.
( b ) A motion for reconsideration must be accompanied by a supporting brief and must describe specifically each allegedly erroneous decision.
( c ) Any response to a motion for reconsideration must be filed within 20 days of receipt of such motion.
( d ) The ALJ will dispose of a motion for reconsideration by denying it or by issuing a revised initial decision.
( e ) If the ALJ issues a revised initial decision upon motion of a party, that party may not file another motion for reconsideration.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation Protection

# Radiation and Its Health Effects

More than 100 years ago, scientists discovered that many elements commonly found on Earth occur in different configurations at the most basic (atom) level. These various configurations (called isotopes) have identical chemical properties, but different physical properties. In particular, some isotopes (known as radioisotopes) are radioactive, meaning that they emit energy in several different forms. This energy emission is what we call radiation.

Over time, we have come to think of radiation in terms of its biological effect on living cells. For low levels of radiation exposure, these biological effects are so small that they may not even be detectable. In addition, the human body has defense mechanisms against many types of damage induced by radiation. Consequently, radiation may have one of three biological effects, with distinct outcomes for living cells: (1) injured or damaged cells repair themselves, resulting in no residual damage; (2) cells die, much like millions of body cells do every day, being replaced through normal biological processes; or (3) cells incorrectly repair themselves, resulting in a biophysical change.

The exact effect depends on the specific type and intensity of the radiation exposure. In general, however, a 3-millirem exposure imposes the same chance of death — 1 in a million — as each of the following common life experiences:

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 20, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Radiation All Around Us
          - Radiation and Its Health Effects
          - How the NRC Protects You
          - Radiation and National Security
          - Related Information

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Related Information

            - Radiation Basics
            - Detecting Radiation
            - Measuring Radiation
            - Information for Radiation Workers
            - High Radiation Doses 
            - Radiation Exposure and Cancer 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 20, 2020
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 413

**Question 413:** This question refers to the answers to Questions 66 and 31 under §20.1003 and §20.1201, respectively, and to Question 26 (d) under §20.1003. Simply designating an area as a restricted area so you can control everyone at occupational dose limits is a perversion of every radiation protection principle published. Of course, this is just my opinion. I hope NRC will revise its interpretation of this definition.

For example, a secretary in a nuclear medicine clinic without any direct person-to-person contact with patients should not be subject to occupational limits just because she is in a restricted area. Many other examples could be cited, and some that are more in the gray area should be examined carefully. Clearly, there is a significant population of exposed persons that are not being held to the proper standard. The following statement refers to the answer to Question 26 (d) concerning "individual E." In spite of the definition of occupational dose, mere geography is not justification for classifying a person as a radiation worker.

**Answer:** The questioner appears to object to the definition of "occupational dose" that states that "occupational dose means the dose received by an individual in a restricted area or . . . ." The NRC cannot change this definition by revising its "interpretation of this definition." The definition can only be changed by rulemaking.

While there may have been a lack of clarity in the referenced answers, our intention is that licensees should not engage in a practice of "simply designating an area as a restricted area so you can control everyone at occupational dose limits." Question 66 asks if a simple fenced area can qualify as a restricted area and the answer is yes, provided it is the licensee's purpose to limit access for the purpose of controlling radiation exposures. Question 31 asks if students and volunteers (such as nuclear medicine students and "candy stripers" who transport nuclear medicine patients or perform volunteer work in a nuclear medicine department) are subject to occupational dose limits. The answer to this question is that these individuals are subject to the occupational dose limits because, and provided that (as the question implies), the type of work they are assigned involves exposure to radiation; it does not matter where (in which area) they are working Question 26 (d) asks if the occupational dose limits or public dose limits apply to "Individual E," a secretary for a radiography company, who works in a "controlled area" next to a "restricted area" containing a hot cell. The answer is that the occupational dose limits apply), again because the type of work assigned presumably involves exposure to radiation since it must be performed near the hot cell.

(References: 10 CFR 20.1003, 10 CFR 20.1201)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
§ 107.1585 Exchange of Debentures for Participating Securities. You may, in SBA's discretion, retire a Debenture through the issuance of Participating Securities. To do so, you must: ( a ) Obtain SBA's approval to issue Participating Securities;
( b ) Pay all unpaid accrued interest on the Debenture, plus any applicable prepayment penalties, fees, and other charges;
( c ) Have outstanding Equity Capital Investments (at cost) equal to the amount of the Debenture being refinanced; and
( d ) Classify all your existing Loans and Investments as Earmarked Assets.
[63 FR 5869, Feb. 5, 1998]