alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7     
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000        
        
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>            1427 
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>           1420 
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>             1427 
<EQUITIES>                       139 
<MORTGAGE>                         0 
<REAL-ESTATE>                      0 
<TOTAL-INVEST>                  1580 
<CASH>                            47 
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                12 
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>            55 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2491 
<POLICY-LOSSES>                 1224 
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>              362 
<POLICY-OTHER>                     4 
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>              6 
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                    0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0 
<PREFERRED>                        0 
<COMMON>                           0 
<OTHER-SE>                       754 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2491 
<PREMIUMS>                       210 
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>               24 
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                20 
<OTHER-INCOME>                     2 
<BENEFITS>                       158 
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>       42 
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>              18 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   36 
<INCOME-TAX>                       8 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               28 
<DISCONTINUED>                     0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0 
<CHANGES>                          0 
<NET-INCOME>                      28 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0.80 
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.80 
<RESERVE-OPEN>                  1239 
<PROVISION-CURRENT>              179 
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                (21)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                58 
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                 105 
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                 1224 
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>          (10)
                                                                                                           


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.604 What benefits may I claim?

You may seek reimbursement for certain reasonable fees and expenses incurred in prosecuting or defending a claim in an administrative proceeding.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Trails & Hiking
0-cr-06218-NCR Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2000 Pa
### §6333. Production of books

If a levy has been made or is about to be made on any property, or right to property, any person having custody or control of any books or records, containing evidence or statements relating to the property or right to property subject to levy, shall, upon demand of the Secretary, exhibit such books or records to the Secretary.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 784; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with
the Annual Report of Interlink US Network, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for
the twelve months ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, A. Frederick Greenberg, Chief Executive
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and
the results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 31,
2009



/s/
A. Frederick Greenberg

---------------------

A.
Frederick Greenberg

Chief
Executive Officer

(Principal
executive officer)





A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 2 of 38
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.440 How does a 7(a) Lender obtain delegated authority? ( a ) In making its decision to grant or renew a delegated authority, SBA considers whether the Lender, as determined by SBA in its discretion: ( 1 ) Has the continuing ability to evaluate, process, close, disburse, service, liquidate and litigate SBA loans. This includes the ability to develop and analyze complete loan packages. SBA may consider the experience and capability of Lender's management and staff.
( 2 ) Has satisfactory SBA performance (as defined in § 120.410(a)(2));
( 3 ) Is in compliance with SBA Loan Program Requirements (*e.g.,* Form 1502 reporting, timely payment of all fees to SBA);
( 4 ) Has completed to SBA's satisfaction all required corrective actions;
( 5 ) Whether Lender is subject to any enforcement action, order or agreement with a regulator or the presence of other regulatory concerns as determined by SBA; and
( 6 ) Whether Lender exhibits other risk factors (*e.g.,* has rapid growth; low SBA activity; SBA loan volume; Lender, an officer or director is under investigation or indictment).
( b ) Delegated authority decisions are made by the appropriate SBA official in accordance with Delegations of Authority, and are final.
( c ) If delegated authority is approved or renewed, Lender must execute a Supplemental Guarantee Agreement, which will specify a term not to exceed two years. SBA may grant shortened renewals based on risk or any of the other delegated authority criteria. Lenders with less than 3 years of SBA lending experience will be limited to a term of 1 year or less.
[82 FR 39503, Aug. 21, 2017, as amended at 85 FR 7648, Feb. 10, 2020; 85 FR 80588, Dec. 14, 2020]
National Park Service

U.S. Department of the Interior

Resource Stewardship Scout Ranger Program

Activity Tracking Sheet

Scout’s Name:

 

Troop Name:

 

Date Park Park Contact What I did What I learned Hours

Total Hours

I certify that I personally worked on these projects or 

programs for the provided hours. 

Scout’s Signature: 

Date: 

I certify that these hours accurately represent the work the 

participant conducted on the listed projects or programs. 

Verifier’s Signature: 

Date:
§ 3903.52 Production royalties. ( a ) The lessee must pay royalties on all products of oil shale that are sold from or transported off of the lease.
( b ) The royalty rate for the products of oil shale is 5 percent of the amount or value of production for the first 5 years of commercial production. The royalty rate will increase by 1% each year starting the sixth year of commercial production to a maximum royalty rate of 121 ⁄ 2% in the thirteenth year of commercial production.
HomeAbout NRCEmergency Preparedness & ResponseAbout Emergency  PreparednessEmergency Classification

# International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (about emergency preparedness)

The International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES) was introduced by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in 1990 as a tool for promptly communicating the safety significance of reported nuclear and radiological incidents and accidents. The scale can be applied to any event associated with nuclear facilities, as well as the transport, storage and use of radioactive material and radiation sources. Use of INES serves to promote a common understanding of the significance of reported events among governments, the nuclear community, the media and the public.

The INES consists of a 7-level event classification system. Events of greater safety significance (Levels 4-7) are termed "accidents" and events of lesser safety significance (Levels 1-3) are termed "incidents." Events without safety significance are termed "deviations" and are classified below Level 0. A description of INES, including an explanation of the various levels and a copy of the IAEA INES User's Manual (2008 edition) can be found at NRC's INES web page.

The NRC does not require its licensees to classify events or to provide off-site notifications using the INES scale. The NRC has committed to transmit to the IAEA an INES-based rating for an applicable event occurring in the United States according to the agreed criteria in “The International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES) User’s Manual, 2008 Edition” which are— (a) Events rated at level 2 or above, or (b) Events attracting international public interest.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, August 28, 2017
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2160

REGINALD D. EVANS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LOUIS CALDERA, Secretary to the United States

Army,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-97-3732-3-17BC)

Submitted: July 30, 2002 Decided: August 22, 2002

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald D. Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Reginald D. Evans appeals the district court’s order setting

aside the jury’s verdict and granting Appellee’s Fed. R. Civ. P.

50(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Evans v. Caldera, No. CA-97-

3732-3-17BC (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 3809.336 What if I abandon my notice-level operations? ( a ) BLM may consider your operations to be abandoned if, for example, you leave inoperable or non-mining related equipment in the project area, remove equipment and facilities from the project area other than for purposes of completing reclamation according to your reclamation plan, do not maintain the project area, discharge local workers, or there is no sign of activity in the project area over time.
( b ) If BLM determines that you abandoned your operations without completing reclamation, BLM may initiate forfeiture under § 3809.595. If the amount of the financial guarantee is inadequate to cover the cost of reclamation, BLM may complete the reclamation, and the operator and all other responsible persons are liable for the cost of reclamation.
§ 107.1920 Licensee's application for exemption from a regulation in this part 107. You may file an application in writing with SBA to have a proposed action exempted from any procedural or substantive requirement, restriction, or prohibition to which it is subject under this part, unless the provision is mandated by the Act. SBA may grant an exemption for such applicant, conditionally or unconditionally, provided the exemption would not be contrary to the purposes of the Act. Your application must be accompanied by supporting evidence which demonstrates to SBA's satisfaction that: ( a ) The proposed action is fair and equitable; and
( b ) The exemption requested is reasonably calculated to advance the best interests of the SBIC program in a manner consonant with the policy objectives of the Act and the regulations in this part.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Board of Directors

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference ofour Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 23,2006 on Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting as ofDecember 31, 2005 included in this Form 10-K/A (Amendment #2), into the Company’spreviously filed Registration Statement (File No. 333-101447).

 
| /s/ Choi, Kim, Park, LLP |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Los Angeles, California  |
| April 25, 2006           |
### [§2521. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–455, title XX, §2001(b)(3), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1849]

Section, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 410, allowed a deduction, in the case of a citizen or resident, an exemption of $30,000, less amounts claimed and allowed for calendar year 1932 and calendar years intervening between that year and year for which tax is being computed.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph J. Little v. Joseph Johnson and Others.

Motion granted, without costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                                  CERTIFICATION


     By signing below, each of the undersigned  hereby certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that, to his knowledge,  (i) this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly  period  ended  March 31,  2003  ("Report")  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii)
the  information  contained  in this Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FFW Corporation.

     Signed this 9th day of May, 2003.

                                  By: /s/ Roger K. Cromer
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                          Roger K. Cromer
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


                                  By: /s/ Timothy A. Sheppard
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                          Timothy A. Sheppard
                                          Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to FFW  Corporation and will be retained by FFW Corporation and will be
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
#### Judson I. Jewell, Respondent, v. Garra K. Lester, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
HomeAbout NRCHow We Regulate

# Rulemaking

The NRC's regulations, sometimes called rules, impose requirements that licensees must meet to obtain or retain a license or certificate to use nuclear materials or operate a nuclear facility. These regulations govern the use of materials at such nuclear facilities as power plants, research reactors, uranium mills, fuel facilities, and waste repositories; the use of materials for medical, industrial, and academic purposes; and the transportation of materials.

For more information about NRC's regulations and the rulemaking process see the following:
            - The Rulemaking Process
            - Regulatory Analysis
            - NRC Rules and Petitions
            - NRC Regulations By Subject Matter
            - Public Involvement in Rulemaking                - Petition for Rulemaking Process
              - Documents for Comment
              - How to Subscribe to Rulemaking Updates 
            - Procedural Requirements
            - Contact Us About Rulemaking
            - Historical Rulemaking Documents

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 07, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Rulemaking
          - Guidance Development
          - Generic Communications Program
          - Standards Development
          - Licensing
          - Certification
          - Inspection
          - Assessment of Performance for Operating Facilities
          - Enforcement
          - Investigations
          - Allegations
          - Events Assessment
          - Generic Issues
          - Research
          - Risk Assessment
          - Performance Assessment for Waste Disposal and Decommissioning
          - Advisory Activities
          - CRGR Reviews
          - Adjudications (Hearings)
          - NMSS Center of Expertise

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### We Welcome Your Views

            Current NRC actions open for comment are published in the  Federal Register and listed on NRC’s Documents for Comment page.

#### Related Information

            - Regulations.gov
            - Federal Register
            - Tomorrow's Federal Register
            - Code of Federal Regulations
            - Electronic CFR (e-CFR)
            - Unified Agenda and Regulatory    Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 07, 2020
#### John Gledhill, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Holders of Austrian Government Four and One-half Per Cent Treasury Notes, Series B, etc., Appellant, *v.*Jacob H. Schiff and Others, Respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 24th day of April, 1915, vacating an order for the examination of the defendants before trial.

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be reversed, and the order for the examination of the defendants before trial modified by *940allowing examination only under the 3d clause of the 1st paragraph of such order, and also by striking from said order the requirement that the defendants produce the books, documents, etc. Mo costs of appeal. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed and order for examination modified as stated in opinion, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 526 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 526

    To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to harmonize the 
              definition of employee with the common law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                March 2 (legislative day, March 1), 2021

 Mr. Scott of South Carolina (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Braun, 
and Mr. Cramer) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to harmonize the 
              definition of employee with the common law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Modern Worker Empowerment Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT OF 1938 TO HARMONIZE 
              THE DEFINITION OF EMPLOYEE.

    (a) Definition of Employee.--Section 3(e)(1) of the Fair Labor 
Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203(e)(1)) is amended by inserting 
before the period the following: ``, as determined under the usual 
common law rules''.
    (b) Definition of Employ.--Section 3(g) of the Fair Labor Standards 
Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203(g)) is amended by inserting ``an employee'' 
after ``permit''.
                                 <all>
```
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Hike the Beaver Jim Villines Homestead Trail

Buffalo National River
AO 399 (01/09) Waiver of the Service of Summons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To:

(Name of the plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint,

two copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within

60 days from , the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the

United States). If I fail to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date:

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Printed name of party waiving service of summons Printed name

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a summons

and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff located in

the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure.

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the plaintiff

and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been served.

 Southern District of Florida

RICHARD LUGO,

THE MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDOMINIUM

20-cv-80992

Chad E. Levy, Esq.

06/25/2020

06/25/2020

THE MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDOMINIUM

s/Cathleen Scott

Cathleen Scott, Esq.

Scott Wagner and Associates, P.A.

250 S. Central Blvd., #104A

Jupiter, Florida 33458

CScott@scottwagnerlaw.com

(561) 653-0008

Case 9:20-cv-80992-RS Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2020 Page 1 of 1