alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 200 (Monday, October 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23205]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MEDICARE PAYMENT ADVISORY COMMISSION


Commission Meeting

AGENCY: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission will hold its next public meeting on Thursday, 
October 28, 2004, and Friday, October 29, 2004, at the Ronald Reagan 
Building, International Trade Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC. The meeting is tentative scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. 
on October 28, and at 9 a.m. on October 29.
    Topics for discussion include findings on congressionally mandated 
studies including: specialty hospitals; certified registered nurse 
first assistants; physician practice expense; cardiothoracic surgeons, 
and direct access to physical therapy. Additional presentations will 
include hospital quality, initial findings on private plans' use of 
imaging services, and a panel on health information technology. The 
Commission will also begin discussion on payment adequacy for various 
Medicare providers.
    Agendas will be e-mailed approximately one week prior to the 
meeting. The final agenda will be available on the Commission's Web 
site (www.MedPAC.gov).

ADDRESSES: MedPAC's address is: 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Suite 9000, 
Washington, DC 20001. The telephone number is (202) 220-3700.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Ellison, Office Manager, (202) 
220-3700.

Sarah S. Thomas,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 04-23205 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-BW-M
Exhibit
4.2


 


DESCRIPTION
OF THE COMMON STOCK OF EMPIRE PETROLEUM CORPORATION


 


Description
of the Common Stock of Empire Petroleum Corporation Registered


Under
Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


 


The
following summary of the common stock of Empire Petroleum Corporation (the “Corporation”) is based on and qualified
by the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) and Amended
and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”). For a complete description of the terms and provisions of the Corporation’s
common stock, refer to the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, both of which are filed as exhibits to this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.


 


Authorized
Capital


 


The
Corporation has authority to issue 150,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share. The Corporation’s outstanding
shares of common stock are fully paid and nonassessable. Holders of common stock have no preemptive rights and have no rights
to convert their common stock into any other securities.


 


Voting
Rights


 


The
holders of shares of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted on by stockholders. Holders of
common stock do not have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors or as to any other matter to be voted
upon by the holders of common stock. The Corporation’s Bylaws may be amended by our board of directors without the vote
or consent of the holders of our common stock or by vote or consent of the holders of our common stock.


 


Dividend
and Liquidation Rights


 


Holders
of common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends as may be declared by the Corporation’s board of directors
in its discretion from funds legally available. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Corporation,
holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities. The Corporation’s
credit agreement limits the amount of cash dividends the Corporation can pay on its common stock.


 


Diminution
of Rights of Common Stock


 


The
Certificate of Incorporation does not currently authorize the issuance of preferred stock. The voting, dividend, and liquidation
rights of the holders of our common stock could be materially adversely diminished by the terms of any series of preferred stock
that may be authorized for issue in the future pursuant to an amendment of the Certificate of Information.


 


Anti-Takeover
Provisions


 


Provisions
of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) may delay, defer, or prevent a change of control of the Corporation.
The DGCL provides certain restrictions on business combinations involving interested parties. Under the DGCL, a corporation may
not engage in a business combination with any holder of 15% or more of its capital stock unless the holder has held the stock
for three years or, among other things, the board of directors has approved the transaction. The board of directors could rely
on this provision of the DGCL to prevent or delay an acquisition of the Corporation.
No: 23-038 July 7, 2023

CONTACT: Ivonne Couret, 301-415-8200

NRC Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Seeks to Fill Open Positions

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards is 

seeking to fill two open positions with qualified candidates who would bring broad experience in 

nuclear safety to the advisory group. The ACRS provides independent expert advice on matters 

related to the safety of existing and proposed nuclear facilities and on the adequacy of proposed 

reactor safety standards. It also advises the Commission on issues involving radiation protection 

and radioactive waste management.

Desired candidates will have extensive experience in nuclear reactor safety issues, 

particularly engineering and safety issues associated with new light-water and non-light-water 

reactor designs and technologies, or in similar fields of nuclear reactor and nuclear fuel cycle 

safety. 

The best-qualified candidates will have at least 20 years of broad experience and 

education and a distinguished record of achievement in one or more areas of nuclear science and 

technology or related engineering disciplines.

Interested individuals can find candidate criteria and details in the Federal Register notice

published today. Resumes will be accepted until October 5. 

Resumes should be sent to Sandra Walker, ACRS, Mail Stop T2B50, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or e-mail Sandra.Walker@nrc.gov. 

More information on the advisory committee can be found on the NRC website.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

SPOTTSWOOD COMPANIES, INC.

PLAINTIFF(S) 

v.

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, A

NEW YORK CORPORATION,

DEFENDANT(S). 

CASE NUMBER

 4:20−cv−10077−KMM

DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a)

Clerk's Default

 It appearing that the defendant(s) herein, is/are in default for failure to appear, answer, or otherwise plead

to the complaint filed herein within the time required by law.

Default is hereby entered against defendant(s)

Zurich American Insurance Company

as of course, on the date August 7, 2020.

Angela E. Noble

CLERK OF COURT

By /s/ Crystal Barnes−Butler

Deputy Clerk

cc: Chief Judge K. Michael Moore

 Spottswood Companies, Inc.

DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a)

CV−37 (10/01)

Case 4:20-cv-10077-KMM Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2020 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VAALCO Energy, Inc. (the “**Company**”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periodended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, Gregory R. Hullinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: August 9, 2010
### [§809. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–218, title II, §205(a), Apr. 10, 2004, 118 Stat. 610]

Section, added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title II, §211(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 733; amended Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1821(d)–(h), (r), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2839, 2840, 2843; Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1018(u)(47), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3593; Pub. L. 107–147, title VI, §611(a), Mar. 9, 2002, 116 Stat. 61, related to reduction in certain deductions of mutual life insurance companies.

A prior section 809, added Pub. L. 86–69, §2(a), June 25, 1959, 73 Stat. 121; amended Pub. L. 87–59, §2(a), (b), June 27, 1961, 75 Stat. 120; Pub. L. 87–790, §3(a), Oct. 10, 1962, 76 Stat. 808; Pub. L. 87–858, §3(b)(3), (c), Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1137; Pub. L. 88–272, title II, §§214(b)(4), 228(a), Feb. 26, 1964, 78 Stat. 55, 98; Pub. L. 91–172, title II, §201(a)(2)(C), title IX, §907(c)(2)(B), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 558, 717; Pub. L. 94–455, title XV, §1508(a), title XIX, §§1901(a)(98), (b)(1)(J)(iv), (L)–(N), 33(G), 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1741, 1781, 1791, 1801, 1834; Pub. L. 97–248, title II, §§255(b)(2)–(4), 259(a), 264(c)(2), (3), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 534, 538, 544; Pub. L. 97–448, title I, §102(m)(1), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2374, related to general provisions regarding gain and loss from operations, prior to the general revision of this part by Pub. L. 98–369, §211(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2004, see section 205(c) of Pub. L. 108–218, set out as an Effective Date of 2004 Amendment note under section 807 of this title.
Exhibit 31


                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

      I, Lee Kasper, President and Chief Financial Officer of NuTech Digital,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

      I have reviewed this First Amendment to Form 10-KSB of NuTech Digital,
Inc. (the "Amendment")

      Based on my knowledge, the Amendment does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Amendment.

      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the Amendment, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Amendment.

      I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company
and have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which the periodic report is being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) disclosed in this Amendment any change in the Company's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

      I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and to the audit committee
of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

<PAGE>


      (i) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
      affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and

      (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
      over financial reporting.


Dated:  March 26, 2004



                                    /s/Lee Kasper
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Lee Kasper
                                    President and Chief Financial Officer
No: 24-004 January 12, 2024 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC, FERC Commissioners to Meet Jan. 25 in Washington, D.C. 

to Discuss Grid Reliability, Reactor and Cybersecurity Issues

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

will meet Jan. 25 to discuss grid reliability, operating reactors, advanced reactor activities, 

cybersecurity and other topics. This continues a tradition of regular joint meetings between the 

two agencies going back nearly two decades, apart from a brief interruption during the pandemic. 

The meeting, hosted by FERC at its headquarters, will begin at 10 a.m. Eastern time in 

the Commission Meeting Room, 888 First St. NE, Washington, D.C. The agenda and link to 

watch the meeting live are available online. 

Staff from both agencies and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation will 

brief the NRC and FERC Commissioners at the meeting.
<PAGE>

                      [McGladrey & Pullen, LLP Letterhead]


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  into all  Registration
Statements  on Form 10-K of Coddle  Creek  Financial  Corp.  of our report dated
January  20,  2000,  relating  to  the  consolidated   statements  of  financial
conditions of Coddle Creek  Financial  Corp.  and  subsidiary as of December 31,
1999  and  1998,  and  the  related   consolidated   statements  of  income  and
comprehensive income,  stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three year period then ended,  which report appears in the Company's 1999
annual report on Form 10-K.


s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
March 27, 2000
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:34:09-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### Rosi Saggione, Appellant, v. Joseph V. Laricci et al., Respondents.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
iDT'. .(rf.|T p,f 

. ,H-OP[;HATiO;-;S 

SERVED: JULY 6, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MARY WOOTEN 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09EA0010 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2009-0077 

ORDER OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

DISMISSING PROCEEDING WITH PREJUDICE 

By "Withdrawal of Request for Hearing," dated June 29, 2011, Respondent states that 

"the parties have come to agreement and resolved and settled the issues between them."^ Accordingly, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice and the hearing scheduled to begin August 4, 2011, is canceled. 

The FAA shall send the Judge and the Docket a copy of any compromise order or final 

order assessing civil penalty. 

SO ORDERED. 

jnnie 

Chief Administ; 

Attachment: Service List 

' The Withdrawal of Request for Hearing, received via facsimile on June 29, 2011, is accompanied by a certificate of service reflecting improper methods of filing and service, as well as an outdated address for the Hearing 

Docket: "I hereby certify that on this 29th day of June, 2011,1 mailed, emailed or faxed a copy of the foregoing to 

[Hearing Docket's former address, Claimant's Counsel, and the Judge]." Id. at 2. The rules require filing and service by either personal delivery or mail, 14C.F.R. §§ 13.210(a), 13.211(a); list the Hearing Docket addresses for 

both personal delivery and mail, § 13.210(a)(1), (2); and state that "a certificate of service shall consist of a statement, dated and signed by the person filing the document, that the document was personally delivered or mailed to 

each party on a specific date," § 13.211(c). Parties must ensure that all submissions, with certificates of service, are 

properly filed with the Hearing Docket and that copies thereof are served on all parties and the Judge. 
FAA Docket No. CP09EA0010 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL 4|m ^ COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 .,^ j. ; -

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite IWlOOO^ 

ONEdOh^ 

RohertH.Waldman, Respondent's Counsel 

113 Ridgley Ave. 1^ 5 

Annapolis, MD 21401 

TEL: 410-268-5050 

FAX: 410-269-1544 

Mary Wooten, Respondent 

3851 Old Solomons Island Road 

Harwood, MD 20776 

Christian L. Lewerenz, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, EALr7 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3273 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

OfBce of Hearings, M-20, Room El 2-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in personal";l|^. 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.B^ 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430,, 

°, use the following addjness: Federal 

Suite 2W1O0O, Washington, 

-2-
No: 23-035 June 15, 2023 

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Amends Licensing, Inspection, and Annual Fees for Fiscal Year 2023

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is amending its regulations for the licensing, 

inspection, special projects, and annual fees it will charge applicants and licensees for fiscal 

year 2023. 

The FY 2023 final fee rule published today in the Federal Register reflects a total budget 

authority of $927.2 million, an increase of $39.5 million from FY 2022. 

The Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act requires the NRC to recover, to 

the maximum extent practicable, approximately 100 percent of the agency’s total budget 

authority for FY 2023, less the budget authority for excluded activities. A proposed fee rule was 

published for public comment on March 3. 

After accounting for fee-recovery exclusions and billing adjustments, the NRC must 

recover approximately $790.6 million in fees in FY 2023. Of this amount, approximately $195 

million will be recovered through Part 170 fees for services, and approximately $595.6 million 

will be recovered through Part 171 annual fees. 

Compared with FY 2022, the annual fees are decreasing for regulatory activities

associated with the U.S. Department of Energy’s Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act 

Program. Annual fees are increasing for operating power reactors, most fuel facilities, spent fuel 

storage/reactor decommissioning licensees, non-power production or utilization facilities, the 

non-DOE uranium recovery licensee, and most materials users fee categories. While the 

operating power reactors annual fee is increasing in FY 2023, it does not exceed the annual fee 

cap established by NEIMA. 

The final fee rule also includes a change in the hourly rate charged for services, affecting

licensees and applicants. The NRC has increased its hourly rate from $290 to $300 for FY 2023 

and has adjusted license application fees accordingly. 

The NRC estimates that the FY 2023 annual fees will be paid by 93 licensees of 

operating commercial power reactors, three non-power production or utilization facilities, 

123 spent nuclear fuel storage and decommissioning reactor facilities, eight fuel cycle facilities, 

one uranium recovery facility, and approximately 2,400 nuclear materials licensees.
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted March 7, 2012 *

Decided March 9, 2012

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

DIANE P. WOOD

, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

No. 11

‐ 3308

KIRSHA BROWN

‐ YOUNGER,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellant,

v.

STATE OF ILLINOIS and CITY OF

CHICAGO,

Defendants

‐ Appellees. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 11 C 6071

Robert W. Gettleman,

Judge

.

O R D E R

Kirsha Brown

‐ Younger appeals the dismissal of her civil rights complaint against the

State of Illinois and the Chicago Police Department for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B). We affirm. NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

* The appellees were not served with process in the district court and are not

participating in this appeal. After examining the appellant’s brief and the record, we have

concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the brief and

the record. See F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 34(a)(2)(C).No. 11

‐ 3308 Page 2

In her complaint, filed in part under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Brown

‐ Younger claimed that

police, the State, the CIA, and the FBI were monitoring her behavior, organizing hate groups

to attack her, and otherwise harassing her. The district court screened the complaint and

dismissed it because Brown

‐ Younger failed to name an individual defendant, specify how

her rights were violated, or allege that any violation of her rights resulted from an official

policy of the State of Illinois or the Chicago Police Department.

On appeal Brown

‐ Younger rehashes the allegations of her complaint and argues that

the district court abused its discretion by failing to serve process on the defendants and by

dismissing the complaint without a hearing. But dismissal here was appropriate because a

complaint must contain sufficient facts to state a claim that is plausible on its face, see

Ashcroft v. Iqbal

, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949–50 (2009); Bausch v. Stryker Corp.

, 630 F.3d 546, 558 (7th

Cir. 2010); Sharp Elecs. Corp. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.

, 578 F.3d 505, 510 (7th Cir. 2009); Brooks v.

Ross

, 578 F.3d 574, 581 (7th Cir. 2009). Brown

‐ Younger’s implausible allegations—that state

and federal officials are organizing hate groups to attack her, using various technologies to

monitor her activities and thoughts, psychologically harassing her, and attempting to drive

her to suicide and financial ruin—do not meet this standard.

AFFIRMED

.
#### § 204.22 Submitting a request for a fire management assistance declaration.

The Governor of a State, or the Governor's Authorized Representative (GAR), may submit a request for a fire management assistance declaration. The request must be submitted while the fire is burning uncontrolled and threatens such destruction as would constitute a major disaster. The request must be submitted to the Regional Administrator and should address the relevant criteria listed in § 204.21, with supporting documentation that contains factual data and professional estimates on the fire or fire complex. To ensure that FEMA can process a State's request for a fire management assistance declaration as expeditiously as possible, the State should transmit the request by telephone, promptly followed by written documentation.

[66 FR 57347, Nov. 14, 2001, as amended at 79 FR 63546, Oct. 24, 2014]