6900 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2014 / Notices 

that study ‘‘represent[ed] a significant 

step forward in benefit-cost analysis,’’ 

EPA recognizes that serious technical 

challenges remain when attempting to 

evaluate the benefits and costs of 

potential regulatory actions using 

economy-wide models. The question 

also remains of the value added of using 

economy-wide models to evaluate the 

economic impacts (e.g., energy price 

and labor market impacts) of air 

regulations relative to other modeling 

approaches. 

EPA is looking for early feedback from 

the public on the draft charge questions 

and draft analytic blueprint that 

outlines the materials EPA could supply 

to the SAB to inform their deliberations 

on the technical merits and challenges 

of using economy-wide models to 

estimate the economic effects of air 

regulations and potential paths forward 

for improvements that could address 

such challenges. EPA is soliciting 

comments and information to help it: (i) 

Evaluate whether the Agency has 

identified the most relevant technical 

materials in the analytic blueprint to 

help inform the SAB panel in its 

deliberations; and (ii) assess whether 

the Agency has identified the most 

relevant charge questions to the SAB 

regarding the technical merits and 

challenges of using economy-wide 

models to evaluate the social costs, 

benefits, and economic impacts in the 

context of air regulations. 

EPA will consider the comments 

received and amend the charge 

questions and draft blueprint as 

appropriate. The revised package will 

then be presented to the Science 

Advisory Board for consideration and 

comment. 

EPA’s Science Advisory Board Staff 

Office will issue a separate Federal 

Register Notice to solicit nominations 

for experts to serve on the SAB panel. 

(Information on the SAB, including the 

process for forming review panels, is 

available at http://www.epa.gov/sab). 

Dated: January 29, 2014. 

Joel Beauvais, 

Associate Administrator, Office of Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2014–02471 Filed 2–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL 9905–51–Region 9] 

Notice of Proposed Administrative 

Order on Consent for Waipahu Ash 

Landfill, Pearl Harbor Naval Complex 

Superfund Site (partial), Oahu, Hawaii 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice; request for public 

comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 

122(i) of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, Compensation 

and Liability Act of 1980, as amended 

(‘‘CERCLA’’), notice is hereby given of a 

proposed settlement, embodied in an 

Administrative Order on Consent 

(‘‘Consent Order’’), with the City and 

County of Honolulu (‘‘CCH’’), under 

Sections 104, 107 and 122 of CERCLA. 

The Consent Order concerns work to be 

done by CCH in connection with the 

Waipahu Ash Landfill, located in part 

on the Pearl Harbor Naval Complex 

Superfund Site, Joint Base Pearl HarborHickam, Oahu, Hawaii and on land 

owned by the State of Hawaii and CCH. 

Parties to the Consent Order include the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(‘‘EPA’’), the Department of the Navy 

(‘‘Navy’’), Hawaii Department Health 

(‘‘DOH’’), Hawaii Department of Land 

and Natural Resources and CCH. The 

property (the ‘‘Site’’) that is the subject 

of this Consent Order includes all areas 

to which hazardous substances from or 

related to the now closed Waipahu Ash 

Landfill have come to be located. Under 

this Consent Order, CCH agrees to carry 

out a remedial investigation and 

feasibility study of the Site under 

CERCLA. The performance of this work 

shall be approved and monitored by 

EPA in Consultation with the Navy and 

DOH. The settlement includes a 

covenant not to sue CCH pursuant to 

Sections 106 or 107(a) of CERCLA. 

Under the Consent Order, CCH also 

agrees to pay the Navy $63,062.00 in 

past response costs and, to EPA, $25,000 

in prepayment of anticipated annual 

EPA future response costs. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before March 7, 2014. For thirty (30) 

days following the date of publication of 

this notice, EPA will consider all 

comments received on the Consent 

Order and may modify or withdraw its 

consent to the Consent Order if 

comments received disclose facts or 

considerations that indicate that the 

settlement is inappropriate, improper, 

or inadequate. 

ADDRESSES: The Consent Order is 

available for public inspection at the 

United States Environmental Protection 

Agency, Superfund Records Center, 95 

Hawthorne Street, Suite 403S, San 

Francisco, California 94105. Telephone: 

415–536–2000. EPA’s response to any 

comments received will be available for 

public inspection at the same address. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Larry Bradfish, Assistant Regional 

Counsel (ORC–3), Office of Regional 

Counsel, U.S. EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 

94105; Email: bradfish.larry@epa.gov; 

Phone (415) 972–3934. 

Dated: January 27, 2014. 

Enrique Manzanilla, 

Director, Superfund Division, EPA Region 9. 

[FR Doc. 2014–02475 Filed 2–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0744; FRL–9906–01] 

Migratory Bird Treaty Act; 

Memorandum of Understanding 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: EPA is announcing the 

availability of the draft Memorandum of 

Understanding (MOU) between the 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) and 

the Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish 

and Wildlife Service (FWS) regarding 

implementation of Executive Order 

13186, ‘‘Responsibilities of Federal 

Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds’’ for 

public comment. The purpose of this 

MOU is to promote the conservation of 

migratory bird populations through 

enhanced collaboration between EPA’s 

OPP and FWS regarding actions carried 

out by OPP. Migratory birds are an 

important component of biological 

diversity, and as such, conserving them 

and their habitats supports ecological 

integrity, contributes to public 

conservation education, and enhances 

the growing interest in outdoor 

recreation opportunities. This MOU is 

an important first step in ensuring that 

pesticide use is consistent with these 

conservation goals. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before March 7, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0744, by 

one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2014 / Notices 6901 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.htm. 

Additional instructions on commenting 

or visiting the docket, along with more 

information about dockets generally, is 

available at http://www.epa.gov/

dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Catherine Eiden, Pesticide ReEvaluation Division (7508P), Office of 

Pesticide Programs, Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; 

telephone number: (703) 305–7887; fax 

number: (703) 308–8005; email address: 

eiden.catherine@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

Potentially affected entities may 

include, but are not limited to: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

• Non-governmental organizations 

interested in bird conservation. 

The listing of North American 

Industrial Classification System 

(NAICS) codes is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide 

to help readers determine whether this 

document applies to them. 

B. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR Part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

i. Identify the document by docket ID 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

ii. Follow directions. The Agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

iv. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

v. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

vi. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns and suggest 

alternatives. 

vii. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

viii. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

II. Background 

A. What action is the agency taking? 

EPA is announcing the availability for 

public comment of the draft MOU 

between the Environmental Protection 

Agency, OPP and the Department of the 

Interior, FWS regarding the 

implementation of Executive Order 

13186, ‘‘Responsibilities of Federal 

Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds.’’ A 

copy of this document can be found at 

http://www.regulations.gov under 

docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2013– 

0744. The document describes internal 

procedural guidance to Federal agency 

staff to assist them in carrying out their 

activities. 

B. Why is the agency taking this action? 

EPA is taking this action pursuant to 

the implementation of Executive Order 

13186, ‘‘Responsibilities of Federal 

Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds’’ (66 

FR 3853, January 17, 2001). 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, 

conservation, migratory birds, 

pesticides. 

Dated: January 28, 2014. 

Steven Bradbury, 

Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2014–02296 Filed 2–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection 

Renewal; Comment Request Re: 

Interagency Notice of Change in 

Control 

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation (FDIC). 

ACTION: Notice and request for comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

requirements of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35), the FDIC may not conduct 

or sponsor, and the respondent is not 

required to respond to, an information 

collection unless it displays a currently 

valid Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) control number. As part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

and respondent burden, the FDIC 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on renewal of 

its information collection entitled 

Interagency Notice of Change in Control 

(OMB No. 3064–0019). At the end of the 

comment period, any comments and 

recommendations received will be 

analyzed to determine the extent to 

which the collection should be modified 

prior to submission to OMB for review 

and approval. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before April 7, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are 

invited to submit written comments to 

the FDIC by any of the following 

methods: 

• http://www.FDIC.gov/regulations/ 

laws/federal/notices.html. 

• Email: comments@fdic.gov. Include 

the name of the collection in the subject 

line of the message. 

• Mail: Leneta G. Gregorie (202–898– 

3719), Counsel, Room NYA–5050, 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 

550 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 

20429. 

• Hand Delivery: Comments may be 

hand-delivered to the guard station at 

the rear of the 17th Street Building 

(located on F Street), on business days 

between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. 

All comments should refer to the 

relevant OMB control number. A copy 

of the comments may also be submitted 

to the OMB desk officer for the FDIC: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES