alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICERREQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Russ Berrie and Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony Cappiello,Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer (and principalfinancial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

 
|   | May 12, 2008                                                                             |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                          |
|   | /s/ Anthony Cappiello                                                                         |
|   |                                                                                          |
|   | Anthony Cappiello                                                                             |
|   | *Executive  Vice President and Chief   Administrative Officer(principal financial   officer)* |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Russ Berrieand Company, Inc. and will be retained by Russ Berrie and Company, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
§ 11.18 Final denial of claim. ( a ) Final denial of an administrative claim under this part shall be in writing and sent to the claimant, his or her attorney, or legal representative by certified or registered mail. The notification of final denial may include a statement of the reasons for the denial and shall include a statement that, if the claimant is dissatisfied with the FEMA action, he or she may file suit in an appropriate U.S. District Court not later than 6 months after the date of mailing of the notification.
( b ) Prior to the commencement of suit and prior to the expiration of the 6-month period provided in 28 U.S.C. 2401(b), a claimant, his or her duly authorized agent, or legal representative, may file a written request with FEMA for reconsideration of a final denial of a claim under paragraph (a) of this section. Upon the timely filing of a request for reconsideration the FEMA shall have 6 months from the date of filing in which to make a final FEMA disposition of the claim and the claimant's option under 28 U.S.C. 2675(a) shall not accrue until 6 months after the filing of a request for reconsideration. Final FEMA action on a request for reconsideration shall be effected in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section.
### §599B. Personnel Management demonstration 1 project 1

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Personnel Management Demonstration Project established under section 102 of title I of division C of the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–277; 122 2 Stat. 2681–585) shall be transferred to the Attorney General of the United States for continued use by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Department of Justice, and the Secretary of the Treasury for continued use by the Tax and Trade Bureau.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, §1187(b), (c)(2), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3127, 3128.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 102 of title I of division C of the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1999, referred to in text, probably means section 102 of title I of div. C of the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999, Pub. L. 105–277, which amended section 122 of Pub. L. 105–119, classified as a note under section 3104 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Codification

The text of section 1115 of Pub. L. 107–296, formerly classified as section 533 of Title 6, Domestic Security, which was transferred to this chapter, redesignated as this section, and amended by Pub. L. 109–162, §1187(b), (c)(2), was based on Pub. L. 107–296, title XI, §1115, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2280.

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–162 transferred section 1115 of Pub. L. 107–296 to this chapter, redesignated it as this section, and substituted "demonstration project" for "Demonstration Project" in the section catchline. See Codification note above.

1 So in original. Probably should be capitalized.

2 So in original. Probably should be "112".
###### Editorial Note on Part 126

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 126.309 May a declined or decertified concern seek certification at a later date?

A concern that SBA has declined or decertified may seek certification after ninety (90) calendar days from the date of decline or decertification if it believes that it has overcome all reasons for decline or decertification through changed circumstances and is currently eligible. A concern found to be ineligible during a HUBZone status protest is precluded from applying for HUBZone certification for ninety (90) calendar days from the date of the final agency decision (*i.e.,* the D/HUB's decision if the protest determination is not appealed, or OHA's decision if the protest determination is appealed) pursuant to 13 CFR 126.803(d)(5).

[76 FR 43574, July 21, 2011, as amended at 88 FR 21088, Apr. 10, 2023]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus Don JUAN-SERRANO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40669.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jesus Don Juan-Serrano pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation and was sentenced to 57 months of imprisonment and a three-year term of supervised release. For the first time on appeal, Don Juan-Serrano challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b).

*358Don Juan-Serrano’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Don Juan-Serrano contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *AlmendarezTorres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Don Juan-Serrano properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.
#### In the Matter of Village of Lawrence, Respondent, against New York State Employees’ Retirement System et al., Appellants.

All concur.
### PART V—SPECIAL RULES FOR BONDS AND OTHER DEBT INSTRUMENTS

Subpart
A.
Original issue discount.
B.
Market discount on bonds.
C.
Discount on short-term obligations.
D.
Miscellaneous provisions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1899A(72), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2963, inserted "on bonds" after "discount" in item for subpart B.
EXHIBIT 23











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors and Shareholders


Crescent Financial Corporation and Subsidiary


Cary, North Carolina





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-160566, 333-137235, 333-136522 333-126871, 333-108456, 333-68974 and 333-68990) on Form S-8 and in the registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-157137) of Crescent Financial Corporation (the “Company”) of our report dated March 29, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, which report appears in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.





/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC





Raleigh, North Carolina


March 29, 2011
No: 23-020 March 10, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC to Seek Public Comment on Environmental Review

of Monticello Subsequent License Renewal Application

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold an in-person meeting March 22 to discuss 

the environmental review process for an application requesting an additional 20 years for the 

already-renewed operating license of the Monticello reactor in Monticello, Minnesota.

Monticello is a boiling-water reactor located approximately 35 miles northwest of 

Minneapolis. The NRC approved the initial license renewal in November 2006, with the reactor 

currently licensed to operate through Sept. 8, 2030. The operator, Northern States Power 

Company-Minnesota, submitted the application Jan. 9. 

NRC staff members will conduct a public meeting March 22 from 6-8 p.m. Central time, 

at the Monticello Community Center, 505 Walnut St. in Monticello. The staff will describe the 

environmental review process and accept comments from the public about the potential scope of 

that review. The staff will hold an open house from 5-6 p.m. Central time for informal 

discussions. People needing accommodations or special equipment to attend or provide 

comments should contact Jessica Umana by March 16, via email at jessica.umana@nrc.gov or 

phone at 301-415-5207. 

The March 22 meeting, as outlined in a Federal Register notice, is one method for filing 

comments on the environmental review before the April 10 deadline. The NRC will hold an 

additional virtual public meeting before the deadline. Comments can also be submitted through 

regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC-2023-0031, via email to 

MonticelloEnvironmental@nrc.gov, or by U.S. Mail to Office of Administration, Mail Stop 

TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. 

The Monticello subsequent license renewal application is also available at the Monticello 

Great River Regional Library, 200 W 6th St in Monticello. More information about subsequent 

license renewal is available on the NRC website.
#### Julius Saur v. Union Savings Bank.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Sylvester Stagg.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless appellant complies with terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
§ 127.600 Who may protest the status of a concern as an EDWOSB or WOSB? ( a ) *For sole source procurements.* SBA or the contracting officer may protest the proposed awardee's EDWOSB or WOSB status.
( b ) *For all other EDWOSB or WOSB requirements.* An interested party may protest the apparent successful offeror's EDWOSB or WOSB status.
[80 FR 55022, Sept. 14, 2015]
# United Sta tes Court of Appe als

F o r th e S e v e n th C irc u it C hi cago, Il l i noi s 60604 December 10, 2001 B efore Hon. JOEL M. FLA

UM, Chi ef J udge Hon. RICHARD A . POSNER, Circui t Judge Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Ci rcuit Judge

CHARL ES LAND an

d APRIL LA

ND, ]

] Appeal from the Uni ted Plai ntif fs-Appel lan ts, ] Sta

tesDi stri ct C ourt f or ] th e Sou the rn Di stri ct of ] I ndiana, Ind ianapo lis Divi sion. No. 01-2025 v. ] ] No. I P00-0220C-HG YA MA HA MOTO R CO RPOR

ATIO N, U.S.A ., ] and YA MA HA MOTO R CO ., LTD., ] ] D avid F. Hamilto n, Defendan ts-Appellees. ] Judge.

O R D E R The op inion issue d in t he abo ve- ent itled cas e o n No vember 2 9, 200 1, is here by amen ded as foll

ows: On Page 2, i

n the f irst paragraph l

in es 2 through 6 should now read:

ex pl oded an d cau sed Lan d perm an en t bac k i nj ury . The plai nti ffs contend that t he W

aveRun ner was def

ective i n desi gn: i t all owed fuel fum es to accumul

ate in the hul

l of the boat, po sin

g serious risk of f i re upon i gni tion

. The WaveRunner

was in subst ant ially

t he
----

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2005/C 325/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Date of adoption: 

Member State: Poland [Dolnośląskie]

Aid No: N 221/2005

Title: Program pomocy regionalnej dla przedsiębiorców inwestujących na terenie gminy Kobierzyce

Legal basis: Ustawa o samorządzie gminnym z dnia 8 marca 1990 r.; Ustawa o podatkach i opłatach lokalnych z dnia 12 stycznia 1991 r.; Projekt Uchwały Rady Gminy w Kobierzycach w sprawie zwolnień z podatku od nieruchomości dla przedsiębiorców na terenie gminy Kobierzyce

Objective: Regional development (All sectors)

Budget: PLN 1,5 million

Duration: 

Aid intensity or amount: 50 %

Other information: Aid scheme — Tax advantage

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

Date of adoption: 

Member State: Germany (Schleswig-Holstein)

Aid No: N 345/05

Title: Abänderung des EFRE-Risikokapitalfonds Schleswig-Holstein

Legal basis: Beteiligungsgrundsätze

Objective: Risk capital — All sectors

Budget: EUR 500 000 — 750 000

Duration: 

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

----
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 101

**Question 101:** 10 CFR 20.1202 (d) requires licensees to evaluate and, to the extent practical, account for intakes through wounds or skin absorption. What type of "evaluation" is appropriate for determining absorption through the skin from skin contamination, and at what "practical level" should it be accounted for? For what nuclides, using what criteria can absorption be neglected under a certain threshold, such as less than 10K, 100K of skin contamination?

**Answer:** The requirement to evaluate and account for intakes through wounds or skin absorption is not new. The old Part 20 has similar requirements [10 CFR 20.103 (a) (1)]. Therefore, the "type of evaluation" that has been used before, if adequate, can continue to be used. The statement in the old Part 20 (10 CFR 20.103, Footnote 4) that such intakes should "be evaluated and accounted for by techniques and procedures as may be appropriate to the circumstances" continues to be appropriate guidance for the revised Part 20.

( Reference: 10 CFR 20.1202 (d)).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017
#### Esskap Holding Corporation, Appellant, v. Seamen’s Bank for Savings, Respondent.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present •— Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.837 SBA decision on application for a new CDC or for an existing CDC to expand Area of Operations. The processing District Office must solicit the comments of any other District Office in which the CDC operates or proposes to operate. The processing District Office must determine that the CDC is in compliance with SBA's regulations, policies, and performance benchmarks, including pre-approval and annual review by SBA of any management or staff contracts, and the timely submission of all annual reports. In making its recommendation on the application, the District Office may consider any information presented to it regarding the requesting CDC, the existing CDC, or CDCs that may be affected by the application, and the proposed Area of Operations. ( a ) The SBA District office will submit the application, recommendation, and supporting materials within 60 days of the receipt of a complete application from the CDC to the D/FA, who will make the final decision. The D/FA may consider any information submitted or available related to the applicant and the application.
( b ) SBA will notify the CDC of its decision in writing, and if the application is denied, the reasons for its decision.
( c ) If a CDC is approved to operate as a Multi-State CDC, the CDC's ALP, PCLP, or Priority CDC authority will carry over into every additional State in which it is approved to operate as a Multi-State CDC.
[65 FR 42633, July 11, 2000, as amended at 68 FR 57981, Oct. 7, 2003]
PAGE | 1 of 2

LAW OFFICES OF JIBRAEL S. HINDI, PLLC

110 SE 6th Street, 17th Floor | Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 | Phone (954) 907-1136 | Fax (855) 529-9540 

www.JibraelLaw.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE No.: 1:20-cv-22665-DPG

FLORIDA FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

THE PALM BAY GRAND, LLC

d/b/a PALM BAY GRAND

Defendant. 

_________________________________/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff FLORIDA FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, INC., by and through undersigned 

counsel, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby files this 

Notice Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice of the above styled action. 

DATED: October 16, 2020

Respectfully Submitted,

 /s/ Jibrael S. Hindi .

JIBRAEL S. HINDI, ESQ.

Florida Bar No.: 118259

E-mail: jibrael@jibraellaw.com

THOMAS J. PATTI, ESQ.

Florida Bar No.: 118377

E-mail: tom@jibraellaw.com

The Law Offices of Jibrael S. Hindi

110 SE 6th Street, Suite 1744

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Phone: 954-907-1136

Fax: 855-529-9540

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

.

Case 1:20-cv-22665-DPG Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/16/2020 Page 1 of 2
PAGE | 2 of 2

LAW OFFICES OF JIBRAEL S. HINDI, PLLC

110 SE 6th Street, 17th Floor | Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 | Phone (954) 907-1136 | Fax (855) 529-9540 

www.JibraelLaw.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on October 16, 2020, the foregoing was electronically 

filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of electronic 

filing to all counsel of record.

Respectfully Submitted,

 /s/ Thomas J. Patti .

THOMAS J. PATTI, ESQ.

Florida Bar No.: 118377

Case 1:20-cv-22665-DPG Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/16/2020 Page 2 of 2
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Nathanial Erwin Ferrell, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00255

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 71st District Court of Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 17

- 0329X ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess

and Justice Stevens , participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of thi s date, we find that the motion of the appellant to

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Nathanial Erwin Ferrell, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 1, 2020

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Composite Exhibit 1

Case 0:20-cv-61418-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 1 of 6
Case 0:20-cv-61418-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 2 of 6
Case 0:20-cv-61418-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 3 of 6
Case 0:20-cv-61418-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 4 of 6
Case 0:20-cv-61418-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 5 of 6
Reg. No. 6,062,657 MPL Communications Limited (UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) 

l Soho Square 

Registered May 26, 2020 London. UNITED KINGDOM W!D3BQ 

Int. Cl.: 9, 16, 25, 41 

Service Mark 

Trademark 

Principal Register 

Director of the United States 

Patent and Trademark Office 

CLASS 9: Optical discs featuring musical performances; gramophone records featuring 

musical performances; compact discs featuring musical performances; magnetic tapes and 

magnetic discs featuring musical performances; video and sound recordings all featuring 

music and musical performances; cinematographic films featuring vocal and musical 

performances; pre-recorded video tapes featuring musical performances 

CLASS 16: Printed matter, namely, calendars, sheet music, music folios, concert and tour 

brochures featuring information about music and musical performances; posters 

CLASS 25: Articles of outcrclothing and underclothing, namely, shirts, blouses, jackets, 

scarves, ties, dressing gowns, bath robes, sleeping garments, hats, socks, belts, caps, gloves 

and aprons, all for wear, jeans, neckwear; knitted articles of clothing and articles of clothing 

made from knitted materials, namely, t-shirts, shorts and hooded tops 

CLASS 41: Musical entertainment and performance services Entertainment, namely, live 

performances by a musical band 

OWNER OF lJNJTED KINGDOM , REG. NO. UK0000202654, DATED 07-10-1995, 

EXPIRES 07-10-2025 

The mark consists of a stylized drawing of wings in the shape of the letter "W". 

SER. NO. 88-580,507, FILED 08-15-2019 

Case 0:20-cv-61418-RAR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 6 of 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          44,123
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,188
<INVENTORY>                                     56,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               176,040
<PP&E>                                         395,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                 288,812
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 286,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,000,416
<COMMON>                                           271
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,776,741)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   286,646
<SALES>                                        528,404
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               528,404
<CGS>                                          364,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,053,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,864
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (906,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (906,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (906,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.42)


</TABLE>