alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §677. Counselor to the Chief Justice

(a) The Chief Justice of the United States may appoint a Counselor who shall serve at the pleasure of the Chief Justice and shall perform such duties as may be assigned to him by the Chief Justice. The salary payable to the Counselor shall be fixed by the Chief Justice at a rate which shall not exceed the salary payable to the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. The Counselor may elect to bring himself within the same retirement program available to the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, as provided by section 611 of this title, by filing a written election with the Chief Justice within the time and in the manner prescribed by section 611.

(b) The Counselor, with the approval of the Chief Justice, may appoint and fix the compensation of necessary employees. The Counselor and his employees shall be deemed employees of the Supreme Court.

(c)(1) Notwithstanding section 1342 of title 31, the Counselor, with the approval of the Chief Justice, may accept voluntary personal services to assist with public and visitor programs.

(2) No person may volunteer personal services under this subsection unless the person has first agreed, in writing, to waive any claim against the United States arising out of or in connection with such services, other than a claim under chapter 81 of title 5.

(3) No person volunteering personal services under this subsection shall be considered an employee of the United States for any purpose other than for purposes of—

(A) chapter 81 of title 5; or

(B) chapter 171 of this title.

(4) In the administration of this subsection, the Counselor shall ensure that the acceptance of personal services shall not result in the reduction of pay or displacement of any employee of the Supreme Court.

(d) The Counselor, with the approval of the Chief Justice, shall establish a retention and recruitment program that is consistent with section 908 of the Emergency Supplemental Act, 2002 (2 U.S.C. 1926) for Supreme Court Police officers and other critical employees who agree in writing to remain employed with the Supreme Court for a period of service of not less than two years.

(Added Pub. L. 92–238, §1, Mar. 1, 1972, 86 Stat. 46; amended Pub. L. 105–233, §1, Aug. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 1535; Pub. L. 110–402, §1(b)(3)(A), Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4254; Pub. L. 117–328, div. E, title III, §307, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 4672.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 117–328 added subsec. (d).

2008—Pub. L. 110–402, §1(b)(3)(A)(i), substituted "Counselor" for "Administrative Assistant" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–402, §1(b)(3)(A)(ii), substituted "a Counselor" for "an Administrative Assistant" in first sentence and "Counselor" for "Administrative Assistant" in second and third sentences.

Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 110–402, §1(b)(3)(A)(iii), substituted "Counselor" for "Administrative Assistant" wherever appearing.

1998—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105–233 added subsec. (c).
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Tuzigoot
National MonumentArizona
----

Action brought on 23 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-358/05)

(2005/C 296/29)

Language of the case: Spanish

An action against the Kingdom of Spain was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 23 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by B. Schima and S. Pardo Qunitillán, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court of Justice should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive should have been transposed into national law expired on 1 July 2004.

----

(1)OJ L 176, 15.7.2002, p. 37.

----
#### In the Matter of the Application of Nicholas Abel, Appellant, to Vacate a Subpœna to Testify in a Certain Action Alleged to Be Pending in the State of New Jersey, between *Henry*W. Bull and Others, Complainants, and International Power Company. Henry W. Bull and Others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 10, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), VMEbus International Trade Association (“VITA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its                           ( print page 60898)                        standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: VMEbus International Trade Association, Fountain Hills, AZ. The nature and scope of VITA's standards development activities are: Definitions, specifications, requirements, and methods of test for computer buses (specifically, but not limited to VMEbus, Futurebus+, VSBbus) and associated software. These specifications will involve Electrical, Protocol (Logical), and Physical (Mechanical) layers for Massively Parallel Architectures, IPC (Interprocessor Communications) channels, AUTOBAHN and other serial buses, Mezzanine Buses for centralized I/O models, Multichip modules, Field Buses (serial buses) for distributed I/O models, Parallel-grouped serial Sub-buses (multiport architectures) with Block Transfer Mechanisms, Reflective Memory Architectures, and other Intracrate Computer Buses.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-22885 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.317 [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

CASE NO. 20-61249 -CIV-DIMITROULEAS

JHON SARMIENTO, Individually and 

on behalf of all others similary situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SCHEAR CONSTRUCTION, LLC, a 

Florida Limited Liability Company, 

Defendant.

/

NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN

Plaintiff, JHON SARMIENTO, gives notice of filing the attached Consent to Join

executed by Michael Book, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

DATED: September 22, 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ ANDREW R. FRISCH______

ANDREW R. FRISCH

MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.

8151 Peters Road., 4th Floor

Plantation, Florida 33324

Telephone: (954) WORKERS

Facsimile: (954) 327-3013

E-mail: AFrisch@forthepeople.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 0:20-cv-61249-WPD Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 22nd day of September 2020, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which I understand will send 

a notice of electronic filing to all parties of record.

/s/ ANDREW R. FRISCH

Andrew R. Frisch

 

Case 0:20-cv-61249-WPD Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2020 Page 2 of 2
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Tule Springs Fossil Beds
National Monument
Nevada


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Junior Ranger
 On This Page Navigation

A ranger flat hat, junior ranger badge, sabertooth cat tooth, and the Tule Springs Fossil Beds Junior Ranger BookThe Tule Springs Fossil Beds Junior Ranger Activity Book features games, puzzles, and information about the fossils, plants, animals, and history of Tule Springs. NPS PhotoTule Springs Fossil Beds Junior Ranger Program
Explore, Learn, Protect!
Junior Rangers help to preserve and protect national parks. They learn about nature and history, have fun exploring the parks, and tell their friends, families, and schoolmates about their adventures. Junior Rangers continue to protect the environment at home and at school.
Our Junior Ranger book is designed for children ages 6-12 (or Junior-Rangers-at-heart), with activities that can be completed at the park, at home, or during your travels. Our Junior Ranger program is free of charge. Badges can be presented to Junior Rangers upon completing activities in the book in person, or via mail.
How can you become a Junior Ranger when visiting?
Since we do not have any facilities on site, copies of the Tule Springs Fossil Beds Junior Ranger Book and Badge can be found at:
The Alan Bible Visitor Centerat Lake Mead National Recreation Area, Nevada
The Lake Mead National Recreation Area Information Desk at: 601 Nevada Way, Boulder City, NV
The Corn Creek Visitor Center at Desert National Wildlife Refuge at: 16001 Corn Creek Road, Las Vegas, NV
Tule Springs Fossil Beds Special Events and Programs, like Junior Ranger Day each AprilHow can you become a Junior Ranger via mail or virtually?
Junior Ranger books and badges may also be sent to you by requesting through:
Email: tusk_information@nps.gov
Mail: Tule Springs Fossil Beds NM, 601 Nevada Way, Boulder City, NV 89005Badges can be requested via mail by providing a photo or scan of your completed book via mail or email addresses listed above.
 Last updated: January 31, 2024
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: Not to be used for navigation purposes
 Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument
601 Nevada Way
Boulder City,
NV
89005
 Phone: 7022938853 (Information Line) Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Interlink US Network, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the twelve months ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, A. Frederick Greenberg, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 15, 2010



/s/ A. Frederick Greenberg

---------------------

A. Frederick Greenberg

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal executive officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
  32.2**

**CERTIFICATION
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection
with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Insightful Corporation for the
quarter ended June 30,  2004, the undersigned, Richard Barber, Chief Financial Officer of
Insightful Corporation, does hereby certify pursuant to 18  U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|3) |  | such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|4) |  | the
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2004 fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Insightful Corporation.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: | September
      10, 2004 | By: | /s/
      Richard P. Barber                                                      
|----- | ------------------------ | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      |                          |     |                                                                                  
|      |                          |     | Richard
      P. Barber                                                          
|      |                          |     | Chief
      Financial Officer 
      (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

32
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. RAFAEL PAHUA

- MARTINEZ,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 22

- 10169
D.C. No. 2:15

- cr - 00140

- TLN

- EFB

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 18, 202 3 * *
Before: GRABER, PAEZ, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. Rafael Pahua

- Martinez appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see United Stat es v. Keller , 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021) , we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 25 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 10169

The district court denied Pahua

- Martinez’s motion because the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors did not support the “drastic reduction” that Pahua

- Martinez was seeking in requesting a time

- served sent ence. Pahua

- Martinez now contends that the district court abused its discretion by limiting its consideration to whether he was entitled to a reduction to a time

- served sentence and failing to consider a “lesser form of relief.” As Pahua

- Martinez concede s, however, he only requested a time

- served sentence and did not seek a partial sentence reduction before the district court. The district court did not abuse its discretion by failing to consider relief that Pahua

- Martinez did not request. Moreover, the district court reasonably concluded that release was unwarranted in light of the nature and circumstances of Pahua

- Martinez’s offense and his criminal history. See Keller , 2 F.4th at 1284

. Because we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in its § 3553(a) analysis , we need not reach Pahua

- Martinez’s argument that the court

erre d when determining that he had not shown extraordinary and compelling reasons for release. S

ee United States v. Wright , 46 F.4th 938, 9 47

- 48 (9th Cir. 2022) ( any error by the district court in assessing whether defendant has extraordinary and compelling reasons “is harmless if the court properly relied on the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factor s as an alternative basis for its holding”).
AFFIRMED.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Social security, supplemental security income for noncitizens.**** 
SuDoc:SSA 1.2:N 73/
ItemNumber: 0517-B
CGPsystem Number: 000487077.
 
Current
 
1997 | 2000 | 2002 | 2004 | 2005 | 2008 | 2012 | 2015
 
February20, 2020**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 20-CIV-22724-GAYLES/OTAZO-REYES

JUAN NIEVES, 

Plaintiff,

v.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION and JANET DHILLON, 

CHAIR OF THE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

MEDIATOR’S REPORT

Neil Flaxman, Esq., the undersigned certified Mediator reports to this Honorable Court as 

follows:

The Mediation was held on the 19th day of July, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. All parties and their 

counsel appeared. The mediation proceeded via Zoom. A resolution was reached subject to the 

execution of a formal settlement agreement.

Dated this 19th day of July, 2022

Respectfully submitted,

Neil Flaxman, Esq.

Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit & Appellate Mediator

L.R. 16.2 Certified Dist. Ct. Mediator (S.D. Fla.)

L.R. 4.02 Certified Dist. Ct. Mediator (M.D. Fla.)

Brickell City Tower, Suite 3100

80 Southwest 8th Street

Miami, Florida 33130

Tel: 305-810-2786- Fax: 305-810-2824

E-mail: neil@flaxmanmediations.com

By: s/ Neil Flaxman

Neil Flaxman, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 025299

Case 1:20-cv-22724-DPG Document 88 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2022 Page 1 of 1
#### § 45.75 Has OMB approved the information collection provisions of this subpart?

Yes. This rule contains provisions that would collect information from the public. It therefore requires approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* (PRA). According to the PRA, a Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number that indicates OMB approval. OMB has reviewed the information collection in this rule and approved it under OMB control number 1094-0001.
No: II-23-009 April 14, 2023 

Contact: Dave Gasperson 404-997-4417 

NRC Schedules Public Meeting to Discuss

Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant 2022 Safety Performance

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting April 20 to discuss the 

2022 safety performance of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant. The four-unit plant is located in 

eastern Georgia near Augusta and is operated by Southern Nuclear Operating Co. 

The event is scheduled to run from 6-7 p.m. Eastern time at the Augusta Technical College, 

216 Highway 24 S., in Waynesboro. The meeting will also be hosted online via Microsoft Teams

and assessable by telephone by calling 301-576-2978, passcode 846788592#. 

NRC resident inspectors based full-time at the site and other staff responsible for plant 

inspection and oversight will be available to answer questions about the plant’s safety performance 

and the agency’s role in ensuring its safe operation. The NRC’s Vogtle Readiness Group will also 

be on-site to discuss regulatory and technical topics about Units 3 and 4 and be available to answer 

questions from those participating remotely during that portion of the annual assessment meeting. 

In August 2022, Vogtle Unit 3 transitioned from the Construction Reactor Oversight Process

to the Reactor Oversight process after receiving authorization to load fuel and begin operations. The 

unit began startup testing in late 2022, reached initial criticality in March 2023, and continues to 

prepare to enter commercial operation.

The NRC found that Vogtle Units 1 and 2 operated safely during 2022. Likewise, the NRC 

concluded that overall performance at Unit 3 protected public health and safety, and Unit 4 is being 

built in a safe manner. As a result, all four units are under the NRC’s normal level of oversight, 

which entails thousands of inspection hours each year. 

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process and the Construction Reactor Oversight Process use 

color-coded inspection findings and indicators to measure plant and construction performance. The 

colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, commensurate with the safety significance 

of the issues involved. Inspection findings or performance indicators with more than very low safety 

significance trigger increased NRC oversight. 

The annual assessment letters for Vogtle 1 & 2, Vogtle 3 and Vogtle 4, including upcoming 

inspection plans, are available on the NRC website. Current performance information for all four 

units is available on the NRC website and updated quarterly.
Exhibit 32.2

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of TransAlta Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brett Gellner, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.            The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| /s/ Brett Gellner |   |
|-------------------|--------|

Brett Gellner

Chief Investment Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

Dated: February 20, 2014.

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----