alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE No. 20-80048-CR-M IDDLEBRO OKS

UNITED STATES OF AM ERICA

JUSTIN SM ITH ,

D efendant.

/

ORDER TO TR ANSFER RELATED CA SE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court pursuant to a Notice of Related Action (D.E. #5)

due to Judge Dim itrouleas having a related case, 19-80030-CR-W PD. Pursuant to Rule 3.8 of the

Local Rules of this District and Internal Operating Procedure 2.15.00, and subject to consent herein

below, it is

ORDERED that the above-entitled cause be and the sam e is hereby transfen'ed to the

calendar of the Honorable W illiam P. Dim itrouleas for a1l further proceedings.

DONE and ORDERED at W est Palm Beach, Florida, this 29th day of Jtme, 2020.

Donald M . M iddlebrooks

United States District Judge

After reviewing the Court file in the above-numbered cause, the undersigned hereby

accepts the transfer of said case. Therefore, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that a11 pleadings hereinafter filed shall bear the following

case number, Case N o. 20-80048-CR-DIM 1TROULEAS, thereby indicating the Judge to whom

all pleadings should be routed or otherwise brought for attçntion.

THE FOREGOING transfer is herewith consented to this < day of June, 2020.

' .

- . - / r

.

. 

/' x

. t .

W ILLIAM P. DIM ITR L AS --

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 9:20-cr-80048-WPD Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/29/2020 Page 1 of 1
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 I, Peter Wanner, certify that:

 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of First National PowerCorporation for the year ended December 31, 2004;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. The registrant's other certifying offering officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the"Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this annual report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committeeof registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisannual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controlsor in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequentto the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March30, 2005

 

 

***/s/ Peter Wanner               ***

Peter Wanner, CFO

 

----
§ 3513.12 What criteria does BLM consider in approving a waiver, suspension, or reduction in rental or minimum royalty, or a reduction in the royalty rate? We will consider if approval: ( a ) Is in the interest of conservation;
( b ) Will encourage the greatest ultimate recovery of the resource; and
( c ) Is necessary either to promote development of the mineral resources or because you cannot successfully operate the lease under existing terms.
----

----

I Informacje

Komisja

----

WSPÓLNY KATALOG ODMIAN GATUNKÓW ROŚLIN ROLNICZYCH

6. suplement do 23. pełnego wydania

(2005/C 334 A/01)

SPIS TREŚCI

Legenda

Lista gatunków roślin rolniczych

----

LEGENDA

----

(1)Dz.U. C 46 A z 22.2.2005, str. 1. Katalog ze zmianami wprowadzonymi 5. suplementem (Dz.U. C 196 A z 11.8.2005, str. 1).

(2)Dz.U. L 193 z 20.7.2002, str. 1. Dyrektywa ostatnio zmieniona rozporządzeniem (WE) nr 1829/2003 Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (Dz.U. L 268 z 18.10.2003, str. 1.

----

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

2.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

3.AGROSTIS CANINA L.

4.AGROSTIS GIGANTEA ROTH.

5.AGROSTIS STOLONIFERA L.

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

13.FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA SCHREBER

14.FESTUCA OVINA L.

15.FESTUCA PRATENSIS HUDSON

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

19.LOLIUM × BOUCHEANUM KUNTH

22.PHLEUM PRATENSE L.

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

35.MEDICAGO SATIVA L.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

43.TRIFOLIUM REPENS L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

48.VICIA SATIVA L.

51.BRASSICA OLERACEA L. CONVAR. ACEPHALA (DC.) ALEF. VAR. MEDULLOSA THELL. + VAR. VIRIDIS L.

III

56.BRASSICA JUNCEA (L.) CZERNJ ET COSSON

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

59.CANNABIS SATIVA L.

62.GOSSYPIUM SPP.

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

64.LINUM USITATISSIMUM L.

66.SINAPIS ALBA L.

67.GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

70.ORYZA SATIVA L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

79.TRITICUM SPELTA L.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----
### §176. Removal from office

(a) Removal of a judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims during the term for which he is appointed shall be only for incompetency, misconduct, neglect of duty, engaging in the practice of law, or physical or mental disability. Removal shall be by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, but removal may not occur unless a majority of all the judges of such court of appeals concur in the order of removal.

(b) Before any order of removal may be entered, a full specification of the charges shall be furnished to the judge involved, and such judge shall be accorded an opportunity to be heard on the charges.

(c) Any cause for removal of any judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims coming to the knowledge of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall be reported by him to the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and a copy of the report shall at the same time be transmitted to the judge.

(Added Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §105(a), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 28; amended Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Subsecs. (a), (c). Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as an Effective Date of 1982 Amendment note under section 171 of this title.
### [§§7237, 7238. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–513, title III, §1101(b)(4)(A), Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1292]

Section 7237, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 860; Jan. 20, 1955, ch. 1, 69 Stat. 3; July 18, 1956, ch. 629, title I, §103, 70 Stat. 568; Nov. 8, 1966, Pub. L. 89–793, title V, §501, 80 Stat. 1449, set out acts constituting violations relating to narcotic drugs and marihuana. See section 801 et seq. of Title 21, Food and Drugs.

Section 7238, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 861, set the penalty for the violation of provisions of this title relating to opium for smoking.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on first day of seventh calendar month that begins after Oct. 26, 1970, see section 1105(a) of Pub. L. 91–513, set out as an Effective Date note under section 951 of Title 21, Food and Drugs.

#### Savings Provision

Prosecutions for any violation of law occurring, and civil seizures or forfeitures and injunctive proceedings commenced, prior to the effective date of repeal of these sections by section 1101 of Pub. L. 91–513 not to be affected or abated by reason thereof, see section 1103 of Pub. L. 91–513, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 21, Food and Drugs.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. No. 97-41492

USDC No. G-97-CV-586

 

TRAVIS DALE GRAY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

---------------------

April 13, 1998

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Texas state prisoner Travis Dale Gray, no. 542293, has

requested from this court a certificate of appealability (COA) to

appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

petition for federal habeas relief. He also requests in forma

pauperis (IFP) status on appeal.

Gray argues that the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

(TDCJ) has erroneously computed the length of his term of

imprisonment and that he should be entitled to mandatory

supervised release on January 23, 1999. Any potential dispute

between Gray and TDCJ "has not ripened into the definite and

concrete controversy" necessary for the adjudication of Gray’s 
O R D E R

No. 97-41492 

- 2 -

claim. Cross v. Lucius, 713 F.2d 153, 159 (5th Cir. 1983). The

controversy is more hypothetical than real and, as such, does not

present a federal court with the Article III case or controversy

requisite to its jurisdiction.

Although the district court did not specify whether its

dismissal was with or without prejudice, such a dismissal is

usually with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Gray’s

requests for a COA and IFP are GRANTED and the judgment of the

district court is MODIFIED to be WITHOUT PREJUDICE to allow him

to bring his claim once the controversy is ripe. The judgment is

AFFIRMED as MODIFIED.
II 

Calendar No. 79 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 522 

[Report No. 117–25] 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to include 

a link to a 100-word plain language summary of the proposed rule. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2 (legislative day, MARCH 1), 2021 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. RISCH, Mr. JOHNSON, and Mr. 

PETERS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 21, 2021 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, 

to include a link to a 100-word plain language summary 

of the proposed rule. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Account5 ability Through Transparency Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 522 RS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO POST A 100-WORD SUMMARY TO 

2 REGULATIONS.GOV. 

3 Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

6 end; 

7 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

8 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(4) the Internet address of a summary of not 

12 more than 100 words in length of the proposed rule, 

13 in plain language, that shall be posted on the Inter14 net website under section 206(d) of the E-Govern15 ment Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) (commonly 

16 known as regulations.gov).’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 79 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 522 

[Report No. 117–25] 

A BILL 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a 

plain language summary of the proposed rule. rule making, to include a link to a 100-word 

JUNE 21, 2021 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
### §9037. Payments to eligible candidates

#### (a) Establishment of account

The Secretary shall maintain in the Presidential Election Campaign Fund established by section 9006(a), in addition to any account which he maintains under such section, a separate account to be known as the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account. The Secretary shall deposit into the matching payment account, for use by the candidate of any political party who is eligible to receive payments under section 9033, the amount available after the Secretary determines that amounts for payments under section 9006(c) and for payments under section 9008(i)(2) are available for such payments.

#### (b) Payments from the matching payment account

Upon receipt of a certification from the Commission under section 9036, but not before the beginning of the matching payment period, the Secretary shall promptly transfer the amount certified by the Commission from the matching payment account to the candidate. In making such transfers to candidates of the same political party, the Secretary shall seek to achieve an equitable distribution of funds available under subsection (a), and the Secretary shall take into account, in seeking to achieve an equitable distribution, the sequence in which such certifications are received.

(Added Pub. L. 93–443, title IV, §408(c), Oct. 15, 1974, 88 Stat. 1300; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 113–94, §2(b)(2), Apr. 3, 2014, 128 Stat. 1085.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–94 substituted "section 9008(i)(2)" for "section 9008(b)(3)".

1976—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" in three places.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1974, see section 410(c)(1) of Pub. L. 93–443, set out as an Effective Date of 1974 Amendment note under section 30101 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
### PART IV—DOMESTIC INTERNATIONAL SALES CORPORATIONS

Subpart
Sec. 1
A.
Treatment of qualifying corporations
991
B.
Treatment of distributions to shareholders
995

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1971**—Pub. L. 92–178, title V, §501, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 535, added part IV to subchapter N of chapter 1.

1  Section numbers editorially supplied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Facilities (NUREG-1567)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1567 (PDF - 833 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2000**Date Published:** March 2000

Spent Fuel Project OfficeOffice of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, D.C. 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Facilities (FSRP) provides guidance to the staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for reviewing applications for license approval or renewal for commercial independent spent fuel storage installations (ISFSIs). An ISFSI may be co-located with a reactor or may be away from a reactor site. These installations may be designed for the storage of irradiated nuclear fuel and associated radioactive materials.

The U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 72, Subpart B, specifies information required to be submitted in applications for license approval and renewal for ISFSIs. Regulatory Guide (RG) 3.48, "Standard Format and Content for the Safety Analysis Report for an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation" provides an outline and specific guidance regarding the information to be included in an applicant's safety analysis report (SAR). This standard review plan is intended to ensure the quality and uniformity of the NRC staff reviews by establishing the review scope and requirements.

The FSRP uses a basic outline defined by RG 3.48, modified based on staff experience with SAR reviews. The modified outline will be used for the related safety evaluation report (SER) prepared by the NRC staff in response to the applicant's SAR. The FSRP includes regulatory requirements, staff positions, references to applicable national and other industry standards and codes, acceptance criteria, guidance on preparation of the SER, and other guidance.

In conjunction with the FSRP, the Spent Fuel Project Office (SFPO) developed several SFPO Director's Interim Staff Guidance (ISG) documents. These ISGs were developed to address emerging issues for which interim guidance was needed. Current ISGs are available on the NRC website. Although the FSRP was revised to incorporate most of these ISGs, ISG guidance will continue to be developed when required. The FSRP will be revised periodically to reflect current guidance to the staff.

Comments are solicited on this document and applicable ISGs. The comments will be considered and incorporated into updates to the FSRP, as appropriate. Comments, errors or omissions, and suggestions for improvement should be sent to the Director, Spent Fuel Project Office, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Mail Stop O-13D13, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 9:20-cv-80993-WPD

TIMOTHY O’BRYAN

Plaintiff,

vs. 

JOE TAYLOR RESTORATION, INC., a Florida

Corporation, AARON GETTY, individually, 

KAREN RADEWICZ, individually, and

GLENDA GALARZA, individually, 

Defendants.

 /

DEFENDANTS’ NOTIFICATION TO THE COURT OF THEIR INTENT TO FILE

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND NON-TAXABLE COSTS

Defendants, JOE TAYLOR RESTORATION, INC., AARON GETTY, KAREN 

RADEWICZ and GLENDA GALARAZA, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby file their 

notification to the Court of their intent to file motion for attorneys’ fees and non-taxable costs. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.3(a)(1), a motion for attorneys’ fees and/or non-taxable expenses 

and costs shall “be filed and served within sixty (60) days of the entry of the final judgment or 

order giving rise to the claim, regardless of the prospect or pendency of supplemental review or 

appellate proceedings.” (i.e., by August 9, 2021)

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.3(b): ...a draft motion...must be served but not filed at least thirty 

(30) days prior to the deadline for filing any motion for attorneys’ fees and/or costs that is governed 

this Local Rule.” (i.e., by July 12.2021)

Case 9:20-cv-80993-WPD Document 88 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2021 Page 1 of 2
The draft motion for attorneys’ fees and non-taxable costs was timely served this date upon 

counsel for Plaintiff.

Dated: July 12, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

Boca Raton, FL

s/ Daniel R. Levine

DANIEL R. LEVINE, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 0057861

E-mail: DRL@PBL-Law.com

PADULA BENNARDO LEVINE, LLP

3837 NW Boca Raton Blvd., Suite 200

Boca Raton, FL 33431

Telephone: (561) 544-8900

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 9:20-cv-80993-WPD Document 88 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2021 Page 2 of 2
#### Helen Schiff v. Alfred Schiff.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1052.]
#### Mary Sweeting et al., Respondents, v. 211-227 East 33rd Street Corp., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 22]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ022.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 365]]

Public Law 109-22
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  30777 Rancho California Road in Temecula, California, as the ``Dalip 
   Singh Saund Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 12, 2005 -  [H.R. 
                                 120]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 30777 
Rancho California Road in Temecula, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Dalip Singh Saund Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dalip Singh Saund Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved July 12, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 120:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Feb. 1, considered and passed House.
            June 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2007 ("Form 10-K"), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
December 3, 2007

|/s/ Harry BrillHarry Brill
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
§ 9185.1-2 Resurveys. ( a ) *Filing of applications for survey without cost to applicant.* The application prepared in accordance with this part, should be submitted to the State Director for the State in which the lands are situated.
( b ) *Filing of applications for survey with cost prorated.* Applications for resurvey based upon the provisions of the Act of September 21, 1918, prepared in accordance with this part should be submitted to the State Director for the State in which the lands are situated. Prior to filing formal application, however, the interested parties should obtain from the proper office, as above designated, an estimate of the cost of the proposed resurvey.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Stretch Your Legs on the Campground Perimeter Trail

Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument