alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section




National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Travel El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro Trail





Contact Us
  Events
 Last updated: August 31, 2017
 Tools Calendar
Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.150 What are SBA's lending criteria?

The applicant (including an Operating Company) must be creditworthy. Loans must be so sound as to reasonably assure repayment. Lenders and CDCs must use appropriate and prudent generally acceptable commercial credit analysis processes and procedures consistent with those used for their similarly-sized, non-SBA guaranteed commercial loans. Lenders, CDCs, and SBA may use a business credit scoring model. When approving direct or guaranteed loans, Lenders, CDCs, and SBA may consider (as applicable) the following criteria: credit score or credit history of the applicant (and the Operating Company, if applicable), its Associates and any guarantors; the earnings or cashflow of applicant; or where applicable any equity or collateral of the applicant.

[88 FR 21085, Apr. 10, 2023]
###### Editorial Note on Part 121

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 121 appear at 72 FR 50039 and 50040, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 121.604 Are 8(a) BD Participants considered small for purposes of other SBA assistance?

A concern which SBA determines to be a small business for the award of a 8(a) BD subcontract will be considered to have met applicable size eligibility requirements of other SBA programs where that assistance directly and primarily relates to the performance of the 8(a) BD subcontract in question.

[61 FR 3286, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 69 FR 29206, May 21, 2004]
----

----

|   | (1) | the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                  | PAPERWEIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORP. |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------|
|                  |                          |   |
| Dated: March 13, 2013 |                          | /s/ Thomas J. Ferree  |
|                  | Name:                         | Thomas J. Ferree |
|                  | Title:                        | Senior Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Exhibit No. 99.1

TRUSTEE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Wells Fargo Bank
Minnesota, National Association (the Trustee) hereby certifies that
the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under the Trust Agreement made as of
October 1, 2001 between Credit and Asset Repackaging Vehicle Corporation, as
depositor, and the Trustee, with respect to Public Credit and Repackaged
SecuritiesSM(PCARS)SM Trust Series 2001-1 during the period from January 1, 2002 to
December 31, 2002.

New York, New York
February 24, 2004

| | WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
| | ------------------------------------------------
| | By:                                             
| |                                                 
| |
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.410 Requirements for all participating Lenders. A Lender must: ( a ) Have a continuing ability to evaluate, process, close, disburse, service, liquidate and litigate small business loans including, but not limited to: ( 1 ) Holding sufficient permanent capital to support SBA lending activities (for SBA Lenders with a Federal Financial Institution Regulator, meeting capital requirements for an adequately capitalized financial institution is considered sufficient permanent capital to support SBA lending activities; and for SBLCs and NFRLs, meeting their respective minimum capital requirement); and
( 2 ) Maintaining satisfactory SBA performance, as determined by SBA in its discretion. The 7(a) Lender's Risk Rating, among other factors, will be considered in determining satisfactory SBA performance. Other factors may include, but are not limited to, review/examination assessments, historical performance measures (like default rate, purchase rate and loss rate), loan volume to the extent that it impacts performance measures, and other performance related measurements and information (such as contribution toward SBA mission);
( b ) Be open to the public for the making of such loans (not be a financing subsidiary, engaged primarily in financing the operations of an affiliate);
( c ) Have continuing good character and reputation, and otherwise meet and maintain the ethical requirements of § 120.140
( d ) Be supervised and examined by either: ( 1 ) A Federal Financial Institution Regulator,
( 2 ) A state banking regulator satisfactory to SBA, or
( 3 ) SBA;
( e ) Be in good standing with SBA, as defined in § 120.420(f) (and determined by SBA in its discretion), and, as applicable, with its state regulator and be considered Satisfactory by its Federal Financial Institution Regulator (as determined by SBA and based on, for example, information in published orders/agreements and call reports); and
( f ) Operate in a safe and sound condition using commercially reasonable lending policies, procedures, and standards employed by prudent Lenders.
[61 FR 3235, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 302, Jan. 3, 1997; 73 FR 75510, Dec. 11, 2008; 82 FR 39503, Aug. 21, 2017; 85 FR 78213, Dec. 4, 2020]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-20163-CR-SCOLA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs.

CARLOS ENRIQUE URBANO FERMIN, 

Defendant.

 /

JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING

The United States of America, by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully moves to 

continue the defendant’s sentencing hearing for seventy-five (75) days and in support of this 

request states as follows: 

1. The Court set a sentencing hearing in this matter for February 11, 2022. 

2. The undersigned requests a brief continuance to the sentencing hearing to mid-to 

late April for two reasons. 

3. First, the current COVID-19 situation is serious. The Center for Disease Control 

reports that Miami has 110,441 cases of COVID and a positivity rate of 34.81%, which appears to 

be the highest number of cases and rate since the start of the pandemic. 1 Given the high 

prevalence of COVID in the community, the U.S. Attorney’s office is on maximum telework 

schedule for the next several weeks and grand jury proceedings have been canceled. The 

1 See https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#countyview?list_select_state=Florida&data-type=Risk&list_select_county=12086 (last visited 

January 11, 2022). 

Case 1:20-cr-20163-RNS Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/12/2022 Page 1 of 3
2

government submits that additional time will allow for a sentencing hearing when the COVID 

situation is likely to be less serious. 

4. Second, the defendant pled guilty to an information for his involvement in a 

corruption and money laundering scheme involving a senior official in the Venezuelan 

government. The government believes that a continuance would further the interests of justice by 

allowing the government to take certain additional key investigative steps, as set forth in greater 

detail in the government’s prior motion to continue sentencing (DE 29), and would also make the 

sentencing hearing more efficient. Further, the defendant is currently on bond for this offense and 

the government does not believe that the defendant poses a danger to the community or flight risk.

5. Defense counsel joins in this motion. Defense counsel further advises that he has 

a pre-planned trip out of the country scheduled from May 2 – May 18, 2022. 

6. The undersigned and defense counsel do not anticipate requesting any additional 

time. 

Wherefore, undersigned counsel respectfully requests that the Court grant his request for a 

75-day extension of the defendant’s sentencing date. 

Respectfully submitted,

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: /s Michael N. Berger

Michael N. Berger 

Assistant United States Attorney

Court No. A5501557 

99 Northeast 4th Street

Miami, Florida 33132

(305) 961-9445

Michael.Berger2@usdoj.gov

Case 1:20-cr-20163-RNS Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/12/2022 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that, on January 12, 2022, the foregoing was filed via CM/ECF 

and thereby circulated to counsel of record. 

By: /s Michael N. Berger

Michael N. Berger 

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 1:20-cr-20163-RNS Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/12/2022 Page 3 of 3
### Regulatory E valuation
Docket No. FAA

## 1'2. 

# o**t~** 

# c.c - 0 '\ \ - 1\0 Directora te Identifi er: --At) 

## f f

yo u make changes to the v a lu es in the t abl e below , y ou m ust e nsure the to tal s upda te acc o rd ingly. 

## Jf they do no t , click (or T ab) in to and the n out of the changed c ell
. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, (e.g. , Inspection, propeller, appliance)

replacement) Work

-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost Do not include on- (include cos t (labor + 

## u.s. fo r U.S. Fleet condition costs here access, te sting, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products Inspection 

### 4.0 '
. ' (j :li**~itt** 01_) 

### 9
. '060.0· <:; 'I(J', (l.OIJ < 1.1 I{J 

### ' 

### o.r,: (J,\11) 

# ooo u,: II O'i 

### rtn ( (Jlj.l .., 

# .... . O.Pt 1 p(Jit I O.Ot• l.i.CO - ,}Iii) \ ()I! !'

## .ou fl Ofi ) 0.0 1 ' OCil 

### r o ' "; 0.1){! 

### ' flJIO 

### ' ,, no**~** I 

## s U.OO 11.00 

# .. [I OIJ**~** 0
. 00 I 

### '· 0.00 i 

### s (!,()(' I 

## s 0.00 0 DG 

### o f. , I 

# " 0 t'l' O.l,l) - ; ; II' 

# ' 0 Ot (l.PU I (:'1 

### ' (j , i;! (1_('0 P 

### .no ') 0 0{· fl.C lJ 

### ' .If: ') 0 {'( ll.f'U r .flil :--, 0 .(){, ()_()() 

### n 11o i 

### ... ) o 

## on i 

### ' 0 {jl) 

### .. 'l {'>.1 I $ 

### o.no I b 0.00 ) IJ !Hl The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs o f compliance for 

### U .S. flee t: $3 , 060 Co s ts covered under warranty (if known) $ On-Condition Costs: Action Work-hours Labor co st Parts Cost Cost p er Product (e.g. , Inspection, (include access , ( @$85/hour) testing, and close

- replacement) up) Replacement 16.0 S 1.J60.ou $500 'pI Yl1' ' 

### no 

## s 0
. 00 5, ( • 

### on 

## s nt:o c, II,OfJ 

## s 000 I (11 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use th is field to explain anything in the Es ti mated Costs t able that was assumed or m i ght not be obvious
. This field can also be used to explain warranty co s ts

) : 

### AD 2000-20

- 12 stated that the manufacturer would provide the replacement fi ttings at no cost. As this was 

### 15 years ago, a fitting cost of 

### $500 is assumed for the analysis
.Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a " significant regulatory action "? 

# G *Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: ls the AD significant?

# ~ *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: YES* 

# 0 N Oi81

YES* 

# 0 N0[8J

WiJI the AD have a significant economic impact o n a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer . 

# G YE SO N0[8J Explanation: This AD only affects 9 US registered gliders. Intrastate Aviatioo in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation 

### in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific reguirements for aircraft operated 

### in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? 

# G YES* 

# 0 N0[8J *Explanation:
#### Francis L. Warner, Respondent, v. George A. Otis Company, Appellant.

— Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held: 1. That the plaintiff failed to show the defendant guilty of actionable negligence. 2. That even assuming that the defendant was negligent in maintaining the unguarded gas jet burning in the hallway from which the fire originated, such negligence was not a proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and Lambert, J., who dissented upon the ground that although the burning gas jet was erroneously eliminated on the trial as a proximate cause, the verdict may be sustained upon the ground that the defendant’s president negligently directed the plaintiff to take the burning bale from the building; whether defendant’s president was negligent or merely erred in judgment was a question of fact.
§ 130.440 Maximum grant. ( a ) No recipient organization will receive an SBDC grant, in any fiscal year under a cooperative agreement, exceeding the greater of the minimum statutory amount, or its pro rata share of all SBDC grants as determined by the statutory formula set forth in section 21(a)(4)(C) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648(a)(4)(C)). This limit does not apply to the distribution of supplemental funds, or to grants provided pursuant to sections 21(a)(4)(C)(viii) and 21(a)(6) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648(a)(6)).
( b ) Additional grants are subject to the limitations set forth in section 21(a)(6) of the Small Business Act unless the statute providing for the additional grant states otherwise.
[88 FR 76645, Nov. 7, 2023]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6446

TERRY L. JACKSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-728-3)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry L. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Terry L. Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jackson v.

Tucker, No. CA-97-728-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 5, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 133

**Question 133:** 10 CFR 20.1101 (b) requires licensees to use, to the extent "practicable," procedures and engineering controls based upon sound radiation protection principles to achieve doses that are ALARA. The ALARA concept emphasizes dose-reduction techniques that are reasonable considering costs. However, "practicable" may imply something that has been proposed and seems feasible but has not been actually tested in use. "Practical" is more consistent with the ALARA concept because "practical" implies "sensible", "involving good judgement" and "proven success in meeting the demands made by actual living or use." In making decisions about ALARA procedures and engineering controls, will licensees be permitted to interpret "practicable" as "practical"?

**Answer:** In the context of this regulation, the word "practicable does not have the connotations attributed to it in the question. 10 CFR 20.1003 states that "ALARA . . . means making every reasonable effort to maintain exposures to radiation as far below the dose limits in this part as is practical . . . " emphasis added). The discussion of 10 CFR 20.1101 (b) in the preamble to revised Part 20 (56 FR 23367) includes the following statement: "Compliance with this requirement [10 CFR 20.1101 (b)] will be judged on whether the licensee has incorporated measures to track and, if necessary, to reduce exposures and not whether exposures and doses represent an absolute minimum or whether the licensee has used all possible methods to reduce exposures." Thus the use of the word "practicable" in 10 CFR 20.1101 (b) does not imply procedures and engineering controls that are unproven.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1101)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, November 01, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTERLY REPORT
ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,142
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,026
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,075
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     23,422
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,001
<LOANS>                                        609,176
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 677,876
<DEPOSITS>                                     503,637
<SHORT-TERM>                                    65,550
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,629
<LONG-TERM>                                     37,606
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            77
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 677,876
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 39,131
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,303
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                41,434
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              16,615
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,119
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           19,315
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      226
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,904
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,501
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,851
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,851
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.02
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,929
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,200
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,968
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       48
<RECOVERIES>                                        33
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,179
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,580
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            599
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating Partners 1992-C, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         341,791
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  680,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,036,253
<PP&E>                                         13,334,971
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,821,380)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,994,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          188,160
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,313,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,994,472
<SALES>                                        1,149,526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,170,273
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  748,724<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                296,960
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            296,960
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   296,960
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

*CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of MedicalCV, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB, as amended,for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marc P. Flores,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated: March  17, 2006 | By:    | /s/ Marc P.  Flores                    |   |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | Marc P.  Flores                        |   |
|                   |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----