FAQ
    
    AGREEMENT STATES
    
    Facility Locator
    
    What's New
    
    Site Help
    
    Index A-Z
    
    Contact Us
    
    Email Updates
      
      
      
      
       
      Report a Safety Concern
                  Search
        Nuclear Reactors
  
  Power Reactors
Research & Test ReactorsOperating Reactors
New ReactorsOperator Licensing
Research ActivitiesNuclear Reactor Quick LinksNuclear Materials
  
  Types of Nuclear Materials
Fuel Cycle Facilities
Medical, Industrial, & Academic UsesUranium Recovery
Materials TransportationMaterials Environmental Reviews
National Materials ProgramNuclear Materials Quick LinksRadioactive Waste
  
  Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities
Low-Level Waste
Waste Incidental to Reprocessing
High-Level WasteUranium Mill Tailings
Low-Level Waste Disposal
High-Level Waste DisposalStorage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Research ActivitiesRadioactive Waste Quick LinksNuclear Security
  
  Domestic Safeguards
Information Security
Radioactive Material SecurityRequired Reporting for Clearance Holders
Insider Threat Program for Licensees
CybersecurityCriminal History & Firearms Checks
Contact UsPublic Meetings & Involvement
  
  The NRC Approach to Open Government
About Meetings Open to the Public
Conferences & SymposiaDocuments for Comment
NRC Rules and Petitions
Facilitating Stakeholder InvolvementNRC Information Quality Guidelines
Subscribe to E-mail UpdatesCommission Schedule
Public Meeting ScheduleAdjudications (Hearings)
Adjudicatory SubmissionsNRC Library
  
  Basic References
Document Collections
ADAMS Public Documents
Public Document Room
LSN LibraryFOIA & Privacy Act
Photos & Videos
Records Management
Training CoursesFAQ Index
Get Copies of Documents
Withholding of Sensitive Information
Controlled Unclassified Information Program (CUI)Electronic Hearing DocketAbout NRC
  
  The Commission
Organization & Functions
Governing Legislation
Plans, Budget, & Performance
Locations
History
Values
Direction-Setting & Policymaking
Research Activities
Radiation ProtectionFire Protection
Safety Culture
How We Regulate
Emergency Preparedness & Response
Public Affairs
Congressional Affairs
Enforcement
International Programs
State & Tribal ProgramsAlternative Dispute Resolution Programs
Privacy Program
Civil Rights Program
Contact Us
Career Opportunities
Contracting Opportunities
Small Businesses
Grant Opportunities
Generic SchedulesOther Links
  
  FAQ
Glossary
Facility Locator
What's NewSite Help
Index A-Z
Contact Us
Email UpdatesNRC Facebook
NRC Twitter Feed
NRC Linkedin
NRC Youtube Channel
NRC Flickr Gallery
NRC Blog Archived
NRC Email Subscriptions - GovDelivery Home
          About NRC  How We Regulate  Research  State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA)Overview of the SOARCA Project
        The State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA) project incorporates the results of more than 25 years of research to analyze the realistic outcomes of postulated severe reactor accidents, even though it is considered highly unlikely that such accidents could occur. The SOARCA objective is to develop updated and more realistic analyses of severe reactor accidents by including significant plant changes and updates (e.g., system improvements, training and emergency procedures, and offsite emergency response) that plant owners have made, which were not reflected in earlier assessments conducted by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). These plant changes also include recent enhancements since the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.

The initial phase of SOARCA analyzed two plants that are typical of the two basic types of U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. The Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station is a boiling-water reactor (BWR) near Lancaster, Pennsylvania, and the Surry Power Station is a pressurized-water reactor (PWR) near Newport News, Virginia. The NRC has not decided whether to analyze additional plants. To understand the purpose and scope of this project, please see the following topics on this page:

Foundation for the SOARCA Project
	SOARCA Methodology and ScopeFoundation for the SOARCA Project

In developing realistic consequences of postulated severe accidents, the SOARCA project relies on many years of previous national and international reactor safety research. Through the years, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), nuclear industry, and international nuclear safety organizations have extensively researched plant responses to hypothetical scenarios that could damage the reactor core or the containment. This research has significantly improved the NRC's ability to analyze and predict how nuclear plant systems will respond to severe accidents, and how accidents progress.

In addition, plant owners have continually improved safety by enhancing their plant designs, emergency procedures, inspection programs, and operator training. Plant owners and local governments have also refined and improved emergency preparedness to further protect the public in the highly unlikely event of a severe accident. Finally, the NRC has incorporated results from studies into health effects from radiation exposure in order to realistically model accident consequences.

The SOARCA project team applied the accumulated research and plant enhancements to integrated computer models. These models are designed to realistically evaluate plant behavior during severe accidents, and the potential public health risk from a hypothetical release of radioactive material. In addition, these models consider onsite and offsite actions — including the implementation of mitigation measures and protective actions for the public (such as evacuation and sheltering) — that may prevent or mitigate accident consequences.



SOARCA Methodology and Scope

The SOARCA project uses computer modeling techniques to understand how a reactor might behave under severe accident conditions, and how a release of radioactive material from the plant might impact the public. Specifically, it uses MELCOR (an integral severe accident analysis code) to model the severe accident scenarios within the plant, and MACCS2 (a consequence assessment code) to model the offsite health consequences of any atmospheric releases of radioactive material.

Using these resources, SOARCA analyzed an example of each major type of operating U.S. nuclear reactor, namely a boiling-water reactor (BWR) and a pressurized-water reactor (PWR). Since this project is a research study and independent of any regulatory action, nuclear power plants are under no obligation to participate. However, Peach Bottom and Surry volunteered for this study. These two plants also took part in earlier accident analyses performed by the NRC, such as those documented in NUREG/CR-2239, "Technical Guidance for Siting Criteria Development" (available through the NRC's Public Document Room), and NUREG-1150, "Severe Accident Risks: Assessment for Five U.S. Nuclear Power Plants." Under the SOARCA project, the NRC staff analyzed one reactor at each of these two sites. (In the future, the NRC may consider extending SOARCA to analyze additional examples of operating U.S. nuclear power reactors.)

The SOARCA project considered postulated severe reactor accidents from internal and external events (such as an earthquake) that begin during full-power reactor conditions. Because this project focused on realistic modeling of select severe accidents during full-power operation, its results are not meant to represent a complete risk analysis. Instead, these best-estimate calculations advance our knowledge of severe accidents, as well as the standard of what is "state-of-the-art."

The NRC's Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) and an independent external panel of scientific and technical experts reviewed the SOARCA methods and results to ascertain that they are state-of-the-art and credible.



          
          Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 07, 2020
    
    Section Navigation
      Navigation
        Overview of SOARCA


The SOARCA Process


Frequently Asked Questions


Related Information
      
      
      
      
      
      
Five representative photos of NRC’s regulatory arenas

      
      
      
      
      
      Spotlight
      Choose a Section

The CommissionLicense Renewal Generic Environmental ReviewJob OpeningsPalisades RestartEnvironmental JusticePilgrim Water ReleasesMonticello Tritium IssueInternational Strategy 2021-2025Tribal Liaison ProgramMAP-XTransformation at the NRC - UpdatedOIG HotlineRulemaking ActivityCommission DocumentsAdvanced ReactorsNuclear SecurityStrategic Plan
    
    Related Information    To learn more about how reactors operate, see the following related pages:Boiling-Water Reactors (BWRs)Pressurized-Water Reactors (PWRs)				To learn more about nuclear power plants in the United States, see the following related pages:Peach Bottom Atomic Power StationSurry Power Station
      Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 07, 2020  Home
NEWS RELEASES

EVENT REPORTS

ADAMS

OPEN GOV

DIGITAL GOVERNMENT

THE STUDENT CORNER

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

FOR DEVELOPERS
        About Us
STRATEGIC PLAN

BUDGET & PERFORMANCE

AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT

LICENSE FEES

HISTORY OF THE NRC

CAREER OPPORTUNITIES

NRC ETHICS

AGENCY STATUS

CONTACT US
        Popular Documents
INFO DIGEST

FACT SHEETS & BROCHURES

FORMS

ELECTRONIC SUBMITTALS APPLICATION

ADJUDICATORY SUBMISSIONS

NRC REPORTS - NUREG

NRC REGULATIONS - 10-CFR

INSPECTION REPORTS

PLAIN WRITING

ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS

RULEMAKING

GLOSSARY
        Stay Connected
    
    
    
    
    United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    
    
    
    
    Regulations.gov

USA.gov

FOIA

Whistleblower Protection

No Fear EEO

Inspector General

Site Map

Accessibility

Privacy Policy

Site Disclaimer

For Employees