alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Willbros Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael F. Curran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 9, 2006 |  | /s/ Michael F. Curran  
|                     |  | Michael F. Curran      
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer



51
#### In the Matter of Frederick A. Jones v. Standard Plunger Elevator Company.

Motion granted. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 9:20-cv-81063-RS 

STEVE HARTEL, Individually and on 

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE GEO GROUP, INC. and GEORGE C. 

ZOLEY, 

Defendants. 

_____________________________________/ 

DEFENDANT GEORGE C. ZOLEY’S 

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES 

Pursuant to Paragraph 2.b. of the Court’s July 27, 2020 Order [DE 5] and this Court’s Order 

Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, dated June 21, 2022 [DE 63], defendant George C. Zoley 

(“Zoley”) respectfully submits this Certificate of Interested Parties. To the best of Zoley’s 

knowledge, the following persons and entities have a financial interest, or may have a financial 

interest, in the outcome of the above-captioned action: 

Party Interest

Steve Hartel Filed initial Class Action Complaint; potential 

putative class member 

Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP Counsel for Steve Hartel and Doug Marshall 

Pomerantz LLP Counsel for Steve Hartel 

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Counsel for Steve Hartel 

Rick Polland Lead-Plaintiff movant; potential putative class 

member 

Desmond Law Firm, P.C. Counsel for Rick Polland 

Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP Counsel for Rick Polland 

Ye Zhang Lead-Plaintiff movant; potential putative class 

member 

Case 9:20-cv-81063-RS Document 67 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 1 of 2
2 

Party Interest

The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Counsel for Ye Zhang 

James Michael DeLoach Lead-Plaintiff; potential putative class member 

Cullin O’Brien Law, P.A. Counsel for James Michael DeLoach 

Edward Oketola Lead-Plaintiff; potential putative class member 

Roche Freedman LLP Co-Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel 

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Co-Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel 

The Schall Law Firm Counsel for Edward Oketola 

Doug Marshall Lead-Plaintiff movant; potential putative class 

member 

Pomerantz LLP Counsel for Doug Marshall 

Portnoy Law Firm Counsel for Doug Marshall 

The GEO Group, Inc. Defendant 

King & Spalding LLP Counsel for the GEO Group, Inc. 

George C. Zoley Defendant 

Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A. Counsel for George Zoley 

Dated: July 22, 2022 Respectfully submitted, 

GUNSTER, YOAKLEY & STEWART, P. A. 

600 Brickell Avenue, 35th Floor 

Miami, FL 33131 

Telephone: (305) 376-6000 

Facsimile: (786) 425-4090 

By: /s/ William K. Hill 

William K. Hill, Esq. 

Florida Bar Number: 747180 

whill@gunster.com

Ernest “EJ” A. Cox IV, Esq. 

Florida Bar Number: 124652 

ecox@gunster.com 

 Counsel for Defendant George C. Zoley 

ACTIVE:15797189.1 

Case 9:20-cv-81063-RS Document 67 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 15.13 Dogs and other animals.

Dogs and other animals, except seeing-eye dogs, must not be brought onto Mt. Weather grounds or into the buildings at NETC for other than official purposes.
#### § 500.106 *Ex parte* communications.

Oral or written communication, not on the public record, between the Board, or any member of the Board, and any party or parties interested in any matter pending before the Board concerning the substance of that matter is prohibited. This section also applies to the Board's staff and employees of the constituent agencies who are or reasonably may be expected to be involved in the decisional process of the matter pending before the Board.
EXHIBIT 32.1: CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
   1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

            In connection with the accompanying Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Magna-Lab, Inc. for the quarter and nine months ended November 30, 2005, the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

            (1)   such Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter and nine
                  months ended November 30, 2005 fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   the information contained in such Quarterly report on Form
                  10-QSB for the quarter and nine months ended November 30, 2005
                  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                  condition and results of operations of Magna-Lab, Inc.


      January 14, 2006            /s/ Lawrence A. Minkoff
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Name:  Lawrence A. Minkoff
                                  Title: President (principal executive officer)
STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

PAUL R. LEPAGE PATRICIA W . AHO GOVERNOR July 20, 2012 Mr . Stephen Perkins EPA-New

England 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 Mail Code OEP06-5 Boston, MA02109-3912 Subject: Negative Declaration - Sewage Sludge Incineration COMMISSIONER

The State of Maine, Department of Environmental Protection, is submitting a negative declaration pursuant to 76 FR 15372, Standards ofPerformancefor New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelinesfor Existing Sources: Sewage Sludge Incineration. Sewage Sludge Incineration (SSI) units are incineration units combusting sewage sludge forthe purposes of reducing the volume of the sewage sludge by removing combustible matter . This subpart exempts combustion units that incinerate sewage sludge not located at a wastewater treatment facility designed to treat domestic sewage sludge (40 CFR §60 .4780) . EPA's information, whichhas been confirmed by our air and wastewater licensing staff, indicates there are no SSI units located in Maine. If at some future point, a unit is located in Maine, the Department will submit a plan adopting these guidelines. If you have any questions, please contact me at (207)-287-2437 or Lisa Higgins of my staffat (207)-287-7023. Sincerely, Melanie Loyzim, Director Bureau ofAir Quality

AUGUSTA 17 STATE IIOUS17 . STATION BANGOR PORTLAND PRI?SQUI? ISLI? AUGUSTA, MAINE u4333-OO17 tOG HOGAN ROAD, SUI'I'F? G 312 CAN( :O ROAD 1235 CHN'I'RAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK (207) 287-7G88 FAX: (207) 287-7826 BANGOR, MAINE 044111 PORTLAND, MAINE 04103 PRESQUI? ISI,I?, MAINE 047G9-2094 RAY F31,1)G., I10SPITfV, ST. (207) 9-41-4570 FAX: (207) 941-4584 (207) 822-6300 FAX: (207) 822-6303 (207) 764-11477 FAX: (207) 760-3143 ,acb site wwxv .macnc.goc/dep
### [§128. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11801(a)(10), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–520]

Section, added and amended Pub. L. 97–34, title III, §§301(a), 302(a), (d)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 267, 270, 274; Pub. L. 97–448, title I, §§103(a)(1), (5), (b), 109, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2374, 2375, 2391; Pub. L. 98–21, title I, §§121(f)(2), (g), 122(c)(3), (d), Apr. 20, 1983, 97 Stat. 84, 87; Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title I, §16(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 505, related to interest on certain savings certificates.

A prior section 128 was renumbered section 140 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

For provisions that nothing in repeal by Pub. L. 101–508 be construed to affect treatment of certain transactions occurring, property acquired, or items of income, loss, deduction, or credit taken into account prior to Nov. 5, 1990, for purposes of determining liability for tax for periods ending after Nov. 5, 1990, see section 11821(b) of Pub. L. 101–508, set out as a note under section 45K of this title.
Company and Address Brand and Type Source/Plant Boral Materials Technologies Apache Class F Arizona Electric Power Co-op 45 Northeast Loop 410, Suite 700 Fly Ash Cochise, Arizona San Antonio, TX 78216 (210)349-4069 Boral Materials Technologies Irvington Class F Irvington Facility 45 Northeast Loop 410, Suite 700 Fly Ash Tucson, AZ San Antonio, TX 78216 (210)349-4069 Boral Materials Technologies Monticello Class F Monticello Plant 45 Northeast Loop 410, Suite 700 Fly Ash Monticello, TX San Antonio, TX 78216 (210)349-4069 Boral Materials Technologies Snowflake Class F Stone Container 45 Northeast Loop 410, Suite 700 Fly Ash Snowflake, Arizona San Antonio, TX 78216 (210)349-4069 Headwaters Resources Navajo Class F Salt River Project 16817 155th Pl SE Fly Ash Navajo Power Plant Renton, WA 98058 Page, Arizona (425)970-3155 Lhoist North America Hi -Cal Hydrated Lime Nelson Plant Mile Marker 112, Route 66 Peach Springs, Arizona P.O. Box 370 Peach Springs, AZ 86434 928-769-2271 Mineral Resource Technologies (Cemex) Coronado Class C Salt River Project 920 Memorial City Way Suite 100 Fly Ash St. Johns, Arizona Houston, TX 77024 (281)685-4312 SRMG/Phoenix Cement Cholla Class F APS Power Plant 8800 E. Chaparral Rd. Suite 155 Fly Ash Joseph City, Arizona Scottsdale, AZ 85250-2606 (480)850-5757 SRMG/Phoenix Cement Escalante Class F Tri-State Generation 8800 E. Chaparral Rd. Suite 155 Fly Ash Prewitt, New Mexico Scottsdale, AZ 85250-2606 (480)850-5757 SRMG/Phoenix Cement Four Corners Class F APS Power Plant 8800 E. Chaparral Rd. Suite 155 Fly Ash Fruitland, New Mexico Scottsdale, AZ 85250-2606 (480)850-5757 

### APPROVED MATERIALS SOURCE LIST
FLY ASH, NATURAL POZZOLAN, AND LIME REVISED JULY 6, 2011Company and Address Brand and Type Source/Plant 

### APPROVED MATERIALS SOURCE LIST

FLY ASH, NATURAL POZZOLAN, AND LIME REVISED JULY 6, 2011

SRMG/Phoenix Cement Gallup Class F Gallup Fly Ash Facility 8800 E. Chaparral Rd. Suite 155 Fly Ash Gallup, New Mexico Scottsdale, AZ 85250-2606 (480)850-5757 SRMG/Phoenix Cement San Juan Class F San Juan Generating Station 8800 E. Chaparral Rd. Suite 155 Fly Ash Waterflow, NM Scottsdale, AZ 85250-2606 (480)850-5757
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7173

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. MICHAEL CLARENCE HOOD,
Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville

. Kenneth D. Bell , District Judge. ( 5:18

- cr - 00005

- KDB

- DCK

- 1 ; 5:18

- cv 00172

- KDB )

Submitted : September 30, 2021 Decided: October 13, 2021

Before RICHARDSON and QUATT LE BAUM , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Christopher Michael Young , YOUNG LAW FIRM, PLLC , Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Michael Clarence Hood seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on
his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating tha t reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is
debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right.
Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Hood’s informal brief, we conclude that Hood has not made the requisite showing. * See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see
also Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an

* Hood’s claim that counsel was ineffective in failing to explain Hood’s plea agreement’s forfeiture provision relating to Hood’s home is not properly before this court. S

ee In re Under Seal , 749 F.3d 276, 285 (4th Cir. 2014) (“Our settled rule is simple: absent exceptional circumstances, we do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal.” (alterations and internal quotation marks omitted)). To the extent Hood argues that the district court failed to construe his § 2255 motion liberally to incl ude this claim, the court addressed all claims reasonably contemplated by Hood’s § 2255 motion.3 importa nt document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ad equately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                       EXHIBIT 8




         SUBSIDIARIES OF FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION LIMITED

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARIES                                                   JURISDICTION

<S>                                                            <C>
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited ........................    New Zealand
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Properties Limited..............    New Zealand
Fisher & Paykel Holdings, Inc..............................    California
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited.........................    United Kingdom
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Pty Limited.....................    Australia
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Inc............................    California
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare SAS.............................    France
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare GmbH & Co KG....................    Germany
</TABLE>
<PAGE>





                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4




                       SUMMARY OF EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS

                        BETWEEN BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

                                AND DR. UDO OELS






Term: Dr. Oels joined the Board of Management in 1996 and his current term will
      expire on January 31, 2006.


Compensation: The aggregate remuneration of Dr. Oels for 2002 is comprised of
the following elements:

Fixed salary: EUR 414.079. Dr. Oels also received remuneration in kind totaling
EUR 25.082 and consisting mainly of amounts such as the value assigned to the
use of a company car for taxation purposes.

Variable bonus: EUR 480.498 (determined by reference to the dividend distributed
by the Company)

Stock option rights: Dr. Oels received a total of 119 option rights, for a
maximum total of 11,900 shares on the basis of his own investments. The options
had no intrinsic value at the closing date.

Retirement: The Company will pay Dr. Oels a monthly pension equal to 80 percent
of the last monthly base salary received while in service. These amounts are in
addition to any amounts received as a result of his participation in Bayer's
Employee Pension Plan. (See Item 6). He will be entitled to receive the pension
upon completion of 30 years of services with the Bayer group or 8 years of
membership in the Executive Board of the Company.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4806 

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to use amounts available to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance to remove munitions 

and explosives of concern in Guam, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2022 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to use amounts available to the Department of Defense for operation and 

maintenance to remove munitions and explosives of concern in Guam, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guarding against 

5 Unexploded Arms and Munitions Act’’ or the ‘‘GUAM 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4806 IS

1 SEC. 2. USE OF AMOUNTS AVAILABLE TO DEPARTMENT OF 

2 DEFENSE FOR OPERATION AND MAINTE3 NANCE FOR REMOVAL OF MUNITIONS AND 

4 EXPLOSIVES OF CONCERN IN GUAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may use 

6 amounts available to the Department of Defense for oper7 ation and maintenance to remove munitions and explosives 

8 of concern from military installations in Guam. 

9 (b) MONITORING OF REMOVAL.—The Secretary shall 

10 monitor and assess the removal by the Department of mu11 nitions and explosives of concern from military installa12 tions in Guam and shall constantly update processes for 

13 such removal to mitigate any issues relating to such re14 moval. 

15 (c) REPORT ON AMOUNTS NECESSARY.—Not later 

16 than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

17 the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate 

18 congressional committees a report indicating the amounts 

19 necessary to conduct removal of munitions and explosives 

20 of concern from military installations in Guam. 

21 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

22 (1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMIT23 TEES.—The term ‘‘appropriate congressional com24 mittees’’ means— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4806 IS

1 (A) the Committee on Armed Services and 

2 the Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee 

3 on Appropriations of the Senate; and 

4 (B) the Committee on Armed Services and 

5 the Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee 

6 on Appropriations of the House of Representa7 tives. 

8 (2) MUNITIONS AND EXPLOSIVES OF CON9 CERN.—The term ‘‘munitions and explosives of con10 cern’’ has the meaning given that term in section 

11 179.3 of title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, or 

12 successor regulations. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
§ 423.37 Activities on iced waterbodies. ( a ) You must not tow persons on skis, sleds, or other sliding devices with a motor vehicle or snowmobile, except that you may tow sleds designed to be towed behind snowmobiles if joined to the towing snowmobile with a rigid hitching mechanism, and you may tow disabled snowmobiles by any appropriate means.
( b ) On iced-over Reclamation waterbodies, you must not ice skate, ice fish, ice sail, walk, ride, drive a vehicle, or otherwise move past buoys or barriers marking public access limits to, or come within 100 yards of, Reclamation structures including, but not limited to, dams, powerplants, pumping plants, spillways, water conveyance gates, intake structures, stilling basins, and outlet works.
( c ) You must comply with all other posted restrictions.
[73 FR 75349, Dec. 11, 2008, as amended at 88 FR 80992, Nov. 21, 2023]
### §456. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 456 was editorially reclassified as section 5346 of this title.
#### STATE, Respondent, v. ESTES, Appellant.

(207 N. W. 160.)

(File No. 6029.

Opinon filed February 8, 1926.)

1. Criminal Law — Intoxicating Liquors — Evidence Held to Sustain Conviction of Transportation.

Evidence consisting of admission of accused held sufficient to sustain conviction of transportation.

*2.*Crimnal Law — Trial—Appeal and Error — Admissibility of Evidence Not Considered, in Absence of Objection or Motion to Strike Out.

Admissibility of evidence of admission of defendant will not be considered on appeal, where 110 objection or motion to strike out was made.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Tripp County; Hon. John G. Bartin®, Judge.

Harold Estes was convicted of transporting intoxicating liquor, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

*P. A. Hosford',*of Winner, for Appellant.

*Buell F. Jones,*Attorney General, and *Bernard A. Broiun,*Brief Attorney, of Pierre, for the State.

■GATES, P. J.

[1, 2] Armed with a search warrant, peace officers went to the home of defendant and under a trapdoor found a case of beer and a boiler partly filled with beer bottles on ice, which upon analysis contained 9 per cent, alcohol. The defendant was charged and convicted of the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor. He appeals from the judgment and an order denying new trial.

Without objection, one of the officers testified (referring to defendant) :

> “He said he did not make any beer; that he bought it and brought it home. He told me on a trip to Kennebec that he never made beer; that he 'bought this and took it home.”

*365Note. — Reported in 207 N. W. 160. See, H-eadnote (1), American Key-Numbered Digest, Criminal law, Key-No. 409, 33 C. J. Sec. 503; (2) Criminal law, Key-No. 1036 (1), 1044, 17 C. J. Sec. 3331.

No other evidence was offered tending to show transportation. No motion was made by defendant to strike out the above' testimony. Appellant’s argument is chiefly addressed -to the proposition that evidence of admissions made by defendant was not admissible until the corpus delicti had been proven. If objection had been made to' the introduction of the above evidence, or if there had been a motion to strike it out, we would feel bound to consider the point urged. As it is, we do not. Transportation by defendant being thus shown, there is naught else in the record which merits consideration.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1


                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bioethics, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Mark J. Cowan, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.


August 12, 2008               /s/ Mark J. Cowan
                              Mark J. Cowan
                              President and Treasurer
(October 15, 1943.)

#### Anna S. Gwydir, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. Albert Cowdell, Jr., Respondent.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.