alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 5.8 What expenses will I incur? You must pay us a location fee and reimburse us for expenses that we incur, as required in this section. ( a ) *Location fee.* ( 1 ) For commercial filming and still photography permits, we will require a reasonable location fee that provides a fair return to the United States.
( 2 ) The location fee charged is in lieu of any entrance or other special use fees. However, the location fee is in addition to any cost recovery amount assessed in paragraph (b) of this section and represents a fee for the use of Federal lands and facilities and does not include any cost recovery.
( 3 ) We will assess location fees in accordance with a fee schedule, which we will publish in the Federal Register and also make available on the internet and at agency field offices. The location fee does not include any cost recovery.
( b ) *Cost recovery.* You must reimburse us for actual costs incurred in processing your request and administering your permit. We will base cost recovery charges upon our direct and indirect expenses including, but not limited to, administrative costs for application processing, preproduction meetings and other activities, on-site monitoring of permitted activities, and any site restoration.
#### § 9.5 What is the Secretary's obligation with respect to Federal interagency coordination?

The Secretary, to the extent practicable, consults with and seeks advice from all other substantially affected federal departments and agencies in an effort to assure full coordination between such agencies and the Department regarding programs and activities covered under these regulations.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4708 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4708

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide coverage for 
 wigs as durable medical equipment under the Medicare program, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2022

Mr. Blumenthal introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide coverage for 
 wigs as durable medical equipment under the Medicare program, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROVIDING COVERAGE FOR WIGS AS DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 
              UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    Section 1861(n) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(n)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``Such term 
also includes cranial prostheses furnished to an individual, but only 
where the dermatologist, oncologist, or attending physician of the 
individual certifies in writing the medical necessity of such 
prostheses as part of a proposed course of rehabilitative treatment.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 199 (Friday, October 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Renewal of the Sacramento River Settlement Contracts, Shasta, 
Tehama, Butte, Glenn, Colusa, Sutter, Yolo, and Sacramento Counties, CA

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice; correction of hearing location.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation published in the Federal Register a 
notice of availability (NOA) and notice of public hearing for the draft 
environmental impact statement for the renewal of long-term contracts 
to deliver water from the Central Valley Project (CVP) to the 
Sacramento River Settlement Contractors. The NOA contained an incorrect 
location for the public hearing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Buford Holt, Environmental 
Specialist, Bureau of Reclamation, Northern California Area Office, at 
(530) 275-1554, TDD (530) 275-8991.
    Correction: In the Federal Register of October 1, 2004, (FR 69 
58947), on page 58948, in the first column, correct the Addresses 
column: The location for the October 27 Public Hearing is the Monday 
Afternoon Club, 120 North Lassen Street, Willows, California.

    Dated: October 7, 2004.
Frank Michny,
Regional Environmental Officer, Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 04-23147 Filed 10-14-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P
#### Jean Braun v. Konrad Braun.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 272 App. Div. 1043.]
Order entered July 30, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01457-CV

CHARLES CHANG, M.D., Appellant

V.

ASHLEY DENNY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-02470-2013

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time to file reply brief. 

We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than September 5, 2018.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
### **CHAPTER 3—COURTS OF APPEALS**

Sec.
41.
Number and composition of circuits.
42.
Allotment of Supreme Court justices to circuits.
43.
Creation and composition of courts.
44.
Appointment, tenure, residence and salary of circuit judges.
45.
Chief judges; precedence of judges.
46.
Assignment of judges; panels; hearings; quorum.
47.
Disqualification of trial judge to hear appeal.
48.
Terms of court.
49.
Assignment of judges to division to appoint independent counsels.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1983**—Pub. L. 97–409, §2(b)(2), Jan. 3, 1983, 96 Stat. 2039, substituted "independent counsels" for "special prosecutors" in item 49.

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–521, title VI, §602(b), Oct. 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 1874, added item 49.

Pub. L. 95–486, §5(c), Oct. 20, 1978, 92 Stat. 1633, substituted "panels" for "divisions" in item 46.
HomeAbout NRCEmergency Preparedness & ResponseFrequently Asked Questions About Emergency Preparedness and Response

# Reporting Requirements

NRC Regulations list reporting requirements for notifying the NRC of emergency and non-emergency events involving NRC-licensed radioactive materials, commercial nuclear facilities, or materials licensed under the Agreement State Program:

**Standards for Protection Against Radiation (10 CFR 20)**
        - 20.1906 Procedures for receiving and opening packages.
        - 20.2201 Reports of theft or loss of licensed material.
        - 20.2202 Notification of incidents.
        - 20.2203 Reports of exposures, radiation levels, and concentrations of radioactive material exceeding the constraints or limits.

**Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance (10 CFR 21)**
        - 21.21 Notification of failure to comply or existence of a defect and its evaluation.

**Fitness for Duty Programs (10 CFR 26)**
        - 26.73 Reporting requirements.

**Domestic Licensing of Byproduct Material (10 CFR 30)**
        - 30.34(f) Terms and conditions of licenses.
        - 30.50 Reporting requirements.

**Medical Use of Byproduct Material (10 CFR 35)**
        - 35.3045 Report and notification of a medical event.
        - 35.3047 Report and notification of a dose to an embryo/fetus or a nursing child.

**Licenses and Radiation Safety Requirements for Irradiators (10 CFR 36)**
        - 36.83 Reports.

**Domestic Licensing of Source Material (10 CFR 40)**
        - 40.35(f) Conditions of specific licenses issued pursuant to § 40.34.
        - 40.60 Reporting requirements.

**Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities (10 CFR 50)**
        - 50.72 Immediate notification requirements for operating nuclear power reactors.
        - 50.73 Licensee event reporting system.

**Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material (10 CFR 70)**
        - 70.32(l) Conditions of licenses.
        - 70.50 Reporting requirements.
        - 70.52 Reports of accidental criticality or loss or theft or attempted theft of special nuclear material.
        - 70.74 Additional reporting requirements
        - (Appendix A - Reportable Safety Events)

**Licensing Requirements for the Independent Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste (10 CFR 72)**
        - 72.74 Reports of accidental criticality or loss of special nuclear material.
        - 72.75 Reporting requirements for specific events and condition.

**Physical Protection of Plants and Materials (10 CFR 73)**
        - 73.71 Reporting of safeguards events.

**Material Control and Accounting of Special Nuclear Material (10 CFR 74)**
        - 74.11 Reports of loss or theft or attempted theft or unauthorized production of special nuclear material.
        - 74.57 Alarm resolution.

**Certification of Gaseous Diffusion Plants (10 CFR 76)**
        - 76.120 Reporting requirements.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 16, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             635
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,833
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     47,347
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        128,946
<ALLOWANCE>                                        723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,298
<DEPOSITS>                                     116,106
<SHORT-TERM>                                    52,676
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,331
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 191,298
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,695
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  873
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    11
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,579
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,366
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,109
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,469
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       65
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  26
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    930
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    727
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         727
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       479
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.66
<LOANS-NON>                                        428
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    972
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   728
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       72
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  723
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               720
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              3
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.314 Standard of review and burden of proof.

The standard of review is whether the size determination or NAICS code designation was based on clear error of fact or law. The appellant has the burden of proof, by a preponderance of the evidence, in both size and NAICS code appeals.

[61 FR 2683, Jan. 29, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 47250, July 18, 2002; 69 FR 29209, May 21, 2004]
### §2416. Time for commencing actions brought by the United States—Exclusions

For the purpose of computing the limitations periods established in section 2415, there shall be excluded all periods during which—

(a) the defendant or the res is outside the United States, its territories and possessions, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; or

(b) the defendant is exempt from legal process because of infancy, mental incompetence, diplomatic immunity, or for any other reason; or

(c) facts material to the right of action are not known and reasonably could not be known by an official of the United States charged with the responsibility to act in the circumstances; or

(d) the United States is in a state of war declared pursuant to article I, section 8, of the Constitution of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 89–505, §1, July 18, 1966, 80 Stat. 305.)
River of 

Life

Tumacácori is in the Santa Cruz 

River Valley. One mile of the river 

flows through the park. Water 

is very important for life. Many 

types of animals live in habitats 

along the river. 

Color the animals hidden 

in the picture.

Here are some clues:

• Black-bellied whistling ducks nest in trees.

• Coatimundis look like long raccoons.

• Bobcats have short tails.

• Javelinas look almost like pigs, 

 but they are not related.

• Packrats are collectors.

• Gopher snakes look similar to rattlesnakes, 

 but they are not poisonous.

• Gray hawks perch high in trees.

• Pipevine swallowtails love to sip nectar 

 from tubular flowers.

• Sonoran toads’ skin is poisonous to dogs.

• Gila topminnow is an endangered fish species.

• People have lived by the river for years.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 5, 2015.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-00641-CV

DEANGELO P. BOSTON, Appellant

V.

DARRELL D. BUTLER, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-02064-E

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright

Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment. On May 18, 2015, 

appellant filed an affidavit of indigence in the trial court. The Dallas County Clerk’s May 18, 

2015 contest to the affidavit of indigence was sustained by written order on May 28, 2015. By 

letter dated May 19, 2015, we directed appellant to pay the $195 filing fee for the appeal. By 

letter dated July 15, 2015, the Court notified appellant that the Dallas County Clerk had informed 

us appellant had not paid or made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record. Appellant has 

not responded to either letter, the filing fee has not been paid, and the clerk’s record has not been 

filed. 
–2–

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 

42.3(c).

150641F.P05

/Carolyn Wright/

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DEANGELO P. BOSTON, Appellant

No. 05-15-00641-CV V.

DARRELL D. BUTLER, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 5, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-02064-E.

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, 

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

prosecution. We ORDER that appellee Darrell D. Butler recover his costs of this appeal from 

appellant Deangelo P. Boston.

Judgment entered this 5th day of August, 2015.
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 1 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 2 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 3 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 4 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 5 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 6 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 7 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 8 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 9 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 10 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 11 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 12 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 13 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 14 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 15 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 16 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 17 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 18 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 19 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 20 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 21 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 22 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 23 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 24 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 25 of 26
Case 9:20-cv-80917-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2020 Page 26 of 26
Case 0:00-cr-06217-DTKH Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2000 Page 1 of 2
Case 0:00-cr-06217-DTKH Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2000 Page 2 of 2
#### Roque TERCERO-ARANDA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 04-51123.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 27, 2006.

Roque Tercero-Aranda, Beeville, TX, pro se.

Magdalena Gurany Jara, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, Jose J. Tavarez, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service District Director’s Office, El Paso, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

An in absentia deportation order was entered against Roque Tercero-Aranda (Aranda) in 1993. Aranda has been serving a 15 year sentence in Texas state prison for burglary of a habitation. Immigration authorities have lodged a detainer against Aranda so that, when he is re*369leased by Texas authorities, he is released directly to the immigration authorities for deportation. Aranda filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition asserting that the Attorney General had custody over him by virtue of the detainer and that he should therefore be turned over immediately to immigration authorities. He further asserted that he had been under the Attorney General’s constructive custody longer than was permitted and that he should simply be released from incarceration altogether. The district court denied Aranda’s § 2241 petition, and we affirmed the district court’s judgment.

Aranda filed a motion pursuant to Fed. R.CivP. 60(b) in the district court. He argued that neither the district court nor this court had jurisdiction over his § 2241 petition because the Attorney General did not have custody over him and was not, therefore, a proper party-respondent to his petition. Citing *Rumsfeld v. Padilla,*542 U.S. 426, 435 n. 8, 124 S.Ct. 2711, 159 L.Ed.2d 513 (2004), the district court pointed out that the Supreme Court had explicitly left open the question whether the Attorney General was a proper party-respondent in a case such as this. The district court denied Aranda’s Rule 60(b) motion, and this appeal followed.

Aranda seeks to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this court. There is no question that Aranda is a pauper. However, Aranda’s primary argument, that a different district court ordered service of process of a § 2241 petition on a prison warden as Aranda’s custodian, is insufficient to show that the district court abused its discretion in denying the Rule 60(b) motion. *See Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi,*635 F.2d 396, 402 (5th Cir.1981). Aranda’s arguments concerning mootness, ripeness, and prematurity were not raised in district court.

Because Aranda has not raised any arguable legal issues on appeal, his appeal is frivolous. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983). Aranda’s motion for IFP is therefore denied, and his appeal is dismissed. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. Aranda’s motion for stay of deportation is also denied.

ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Trail Rides

Guadalupe Mountains National Park
§ 3461.3-1 Application of criteria on unleased lands. ( a ) The unsuitability criteria shall only be applied, prior to lease issuance, to all lands leased after July 19, 1979.
( b ) The unsuitability criteria shall be initially applied either: ( 1 ) During land use planning or the environmental assessment conducted for a specific lease application; or
( 2 ) During land use planning under the provisions of § 3420.1-4 of this title.
[47 FR 33149, July 30, 1982. Redesignated at 52 FR 46473, Dec. 8, 1987]
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Southern District of Florida NELSON FERNANDEZ 9:20-cv-80469-KAM

THE WALKING COMPANY, 

a foreign for-profit corporation

THE WALKING COMPANY 

By Serving Its Registered Agent: 

CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY 

1201 HAYS STREET 

TALLAHASSEE FL 32301

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ. 

8751 WEST BROWARD BOULEVARD 

SUITE 303 

PLANTATION FL 33324 

Telephone: (954) 362-3800

03/23/2020 s/ C.Davis

Case 9:20-cv-80469-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/23/2020 Page 1 of 1