alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 9/30/97
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000894972
<NAME> CHANCELLOR MEDIA CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,982
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  193,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,684
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,544
<PP&E>                                         191,931
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,213,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,739
<BONDS>                                      1,857,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          449,614
<PREFERRED>                                    299,500
<COMMON>                                           596
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,213,376
<SALES>                                        333,283
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               333,283
<CGS>                                           49,711
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  300,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,036
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,882
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,244
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,141)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,350)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,239)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 103

**Question 103:** 10 CFR 20.1302 (b) (2) (ii) refers to "the dose from external sources." 
> 
(a) What are "external sources"? 

(b) Are both (1) shine from the facility or from stored contaminated materials and sources, as well as (2) cloud shine from effluents to be included?

**Answer:**
> 
(a) "External sources" are radiation sources outside the body.

(b) Yes. 

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1302).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 81

**Question 81:**
> 
(a) Are licensees required to provide instruction on the procedures for declaring her pregnancy to an occupationally exposed woman if she does not enter a restricted area? 

(b) Is it necessary to monitor all (occupationally exposed) declared pregnant women?

**Answer:**
> 
(a) There are no provisions in the revised Part 20, or in Part 19, to provide instruction on declarations of pregnancy to women who are occupationally exposed but do not enter a restricted area. It is suggested that the licensee, in accordance with good radiation practice, provide instruction on this topic to all occupationally exposed individuals, regardless of where they receive exposure.

(b) No. Only declared pregnant women who are likely to receive in one year from sources external to the body adose in excess of 0.05 rem (20.1502 (a) (2)) or who are likely to receive in one year a committed effective dose equivalent in excess of 0.05 rem from occupational intakes (20.1502 (b) (2)).

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1502)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, December 13, 2017
§ 107.1182 Valuation requirements for Early Stage SBICs based on Capital Impairment Percentage. ( a ) If you are an Early Stage SBIC, you must compute your Capital Impairment Percentage and determine whether you have a condition of Capital Impairment in accordance with §§ 107.1830 and 107.1840 of this part.
( b ) You must promptly notify SBA in writing if your Capital Impairment Percentage is at least 50 percent, even if your maximum permitted Capital Impairment Percentage is higher.
( c ) Upon receipt of your notification under paragraph (b) of this section, or upon making its own determination that your Capital Impairment Percentage is at least 50 percent, SBA has the right to require you to engage, at your expense, an independent third party, acceptable to SBA, to prepare valuations of some or all of your Loans and Investments, as designated by SBA.
[77 FR 25053, Apr. 27, 2012]
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.608 What are the special rules for calculating net worth and number of employees? ( a ) Your net worth must include the value of any assets disposed of for the purpose of meeting an eligibility standard, and must exclude any obligation incurred for that purpose. Transfers of assets, or obligations incurred, for less than reasonably equivalent value will be presumed to have been made for the purpose of meeting an eligibility standard.
( b ) If you are an owner of an unincorporated business, or a partnership, corporation, association, organization, or unit of local government, your net worth must include the net worth of all of your affiliates. “Affiliates” are: ( 1 ) Corporations or other business entities which directly or indirectly own or control a majority of the voting shares or other ownership interests in the applicant concern; and
( 2 ) Corporations or other business entities in which the applicant concern directly or indirectly owns or controls a majority of the voting shares or other ownership interests.
( c ) Your employees include all those persons regularly working for you at the time the administrative proceeding was initiated, whether or not they were at work on that date. Part-time employees must be included on a proportional basis. You must include the employees of all your affiliates in your total number of employees.
#### In the Matter of Arbitration between Epstein-Harris Manufacturing Company, Appellant, and Belvedere Fabrics, Inc., et al., Respondents.

*760No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
### §2507. Calls and discovery

(a) The United States Court of Federal Claims may call upon any department or agency of the United States or upon any party for any information or papers, not privileged, for purposes of discovery or for use as evidence. The head of any department or agency may refuse to comply with a call issued pursuant to this subsection when, in his opinion, compliance will be injurious to the public interest.

(b) Without limitation on account of anything contained in subsection (a) of this section, the court may, in accordance with its rules, provide additional means for the discovery of any relevant facts, books, papers, documents or tangible things, not privileged.

(c) The Court of Federal Claims may use all recorded and printed reports made by the committees of the Senate or House of Representatives.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 977; Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1263, §55(a)–(c), 68 Stat. 1247; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §139(f), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 42; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §272 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §164, 36 Stat. 1140).

Words "or agency" were added. (See reviser's note under section 1345 of this title.)

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–572, §902(a)(1), substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–572, §902(a)(2), substituted "Court of Federal Claims" for "Claims Court".

1982—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–164, §139(f)(1), substituted "United States Claims Court" for "Court of Claims".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97–164, §139(f)(2), substituted "Claims Court" for "Court of Claims".

1954—Act Sept. 3, 1954, substituted "Calls and discovery" for "Calls on departments for information" in section catchline, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), and added subsecs. (b) and (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.
Second Department,

March, 1949.

(March 7, 1949.)

#### Bent Steel Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Western Electric Company, Incorporated, Appellant.

Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1066.]
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5056 

To prohibit Federal funding to EcoHealth Alliance, Inc., and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 

Ms. ERNST (for herself and Mr. MARSHALL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funding to EcoHealth Alliance, Inc., 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defund EcoHealth Al5 liance Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDING TO 

7 ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE, INC. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—No funds authorized or appro9 priated by Federal law may be made available for any pur10 pose to EcoHealth Alliance, Inc., including any subsidiVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:57 Oct 18, 2022 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S5056.IS S5056

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5056 IS

1 aries and related organizations that are directly controlled 

2 by EcoHealth Alliance, Inc. 

3 (b) GAO STUDY AND REPORT.—Not later than 2 

4 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

5 Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct 

6 a study, and submit a report to Congress, regarding the 

7 amount of Federal funds awarded to EcoHealth Alliance, 

8 Inc., during the 10-year period preceding such date of en9 actment, that were provided, whether purposely or inad10 vertently, to the People’s Republic of China, the Chinese 

11 Communist Party, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, or any 

12 agency or instrumentality of such entities. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
No: I-23-007 June 26, 2023 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331 

New NRC Resident Inspector Assigned to Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, 

Pennsylvania, have selected Travis Daun as the new senior resident 

inspector at Seabrook Station, in Seabrook, New Hampshire. 

Daun joined the NRC in 2012 as a reactor engineer in the NRC’s 

Region III Office in Lisle, Illinois. Most recently, he was a resident 

inspector at Seabrook. Prior to that, he had been the resident inspector at 

the Susquehanna plant in Berwick, Pennsylvania. Daun previously had 

served for 11 years in the Navy’s nuclear power program. He has a 

bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Marquette University, a 

master’s degree in cyber security from Syracuse University, and a master’s in business management 

from American Intercontinental University. 

“Travis is an excellent choice for Seabrook senior resident. He has the skills, experience and 

qualifications to successfully lead the inspection team at Seabrook,” said Region I Administrator 

Ray Lorson. “I am confident he will help to ensure the Seabrook plant operates safely and meets all 

of the NRC’s safety requirements.” 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as 

the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects 

and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can be assigned to a site for 

up to seven years.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         473,387
<SECURITIES>                                19,847,105
<RECEIVABLES>                                  387,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,600
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,724,732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          359,617
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,365,115
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,724,732
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,023
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                179,641
<INCOME-TAX>                                   179,641
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            179,641
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   179,641
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of ARAMARK Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L.
Frederick Sutherland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ L. FREDERICK SUTHERLANDL. Frederick Sutherland
#### § 3503.41 Will BLM disclose information I submit under these regulations?

All Federal and Indian data and information submitted to the BLM are subject to part 2 of this title. Part 2 includes the regulations of the Department of the Interior covering public disclosure of data and information contained in Department of the Interior records. BLM may make certain mineral information not protected from disclosure under part 2 of this title may be made available for inspection without a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
No: II-23-008 April 12, 2023 

Contact: Dave Gasperson 404-997-4417 

NRC Schedules Virtual Meeting to Discuss Performance 

of the Catawba, McGuire, and Oconee Nuclear Power Plants

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss the 2022 safety performance of the 

Catawba, McGuire, and Oconee nuclear power plants during a virtual meeting to be held April 17. 

The event will begin at 6 p.m., Eastern time, led by the NRC staff responsible for 

conducting plant inspections. The public and the media can access the meeting via Teams. The 

telephone conference number for those without access to Teams is 301-576-2978, passcode 

114102495#. 

Duke Energy operates the three plants. The two-unit Catawba and three-unit Oconee plants 

are located in South Carolina, and the two-unit McGuire plant is in North Carolina. 

NRC resident inspectors and other inspection specialists from the Region II office in Atlanta 

performed inspections at the three sites. They found that the Catawba, McGuire and Oconee plants 

operated safely during 2022. All three plants are currently under the NRC’s normal level of 

oversight. 

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow, or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or 

performance indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC 

oversight. 

The annual assessment letters for the Catawba plant, the McGuire plant and the Oconee 

plant, including upcoming inspection plans for the plants, are available on the NRC website. 

Current performance information for the plants is available and updated quarterly.
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateResearchFire Research Program

# Collaborative Fire Research

In orchestrating the Fire Research Program for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the Fire Research Branch in the NRC's Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research performs the following vital functions:
        - Plan, develop, and manage a variety of state-of-the-art  fire research projects .
        - Develop and validate fire analysis methodologies and supporting data.
        - Use the research results as the basis for recommending improvements to risk-inform NRC regulations and achieve the desired outcomes of enhanced safety, efficiency, and effectiveness.

To augment the Fire Research Program and leverage the NRC's resources, the staff represents the agency in collaborative fire research initiatives. These initiatives involve a variety of outside organizations, including the U.S. Department of Energy and other Federal agencies, the nuclear industry, universities, standards development committees, and international fire research forums. In particular, the staff enjoys excellent working relationships with the following technical organizations:
        - Electric Power Research Institute ( EPRI )
        - National Institute for Standards and Technology's, Building and Fire Research Laboratory ( NIST-BFRL )
        - Sandia National Laboratory ( SNL )
        - University of Maryland, Center for Technology Risk Studies ( UM-CTRS )

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 7, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Fire Research Projects
          - Collaborative Research
          - NRC High Energy Arc Fault (HEAF) Research

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 7, 2020
United States Department of the Interior

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 

Mid-Pacific Regional Office

IN REPLY 2800 Cottage Way 

REFER TO: Sacramento, California 95825-1898 

MP-3400 December 17, 2002 

WTR-4.00 

To: Cachuma and Solano Project Water Contractors 

Subject: Fiscal Year 2002 Water Deliveries and Revenues Report (WDR) for Project Water 

Dear Water Contractor: 

The Bureau of Reclamation has recently been providing the Central Valley Project water users a 

WDR for their review and input to ensure the accuracy of our recorded data. The purpose of this 

letter is to provide a WDR to Cachuma and Solano project water contractors for your review and 

input to ensure the accuracy of our recorded data. We have enclosed a copy of the WDR 

showing water deliveries and revenues, if any, for the period October 1, 2001, through 

September 30, 2002. This information is in a summarized format to allow you an opportunity to 

review the data and identify any potential errors or omissions. 

Please indicate on the enclosed WDR that the information is correct or not correct, explain any 

discrepancies, and return it to us no later than January 16, 2003, by fax at 916-978-5392 or in the 

envelope provided. Any discrepancies reported to Reclamation will be reviewed on an 

individual basis and resolved and discussed with you, as appropriate. 

If you have any questions, please contact the applicable Ratesetting Service staff: 

Irrigation: Ms. Linda Bringle at 916-978-5391 or; 

 Ms. Maureen Reynoso at 916-978-5374 

M&I: Ms. Masako Altman at 916-978-5365 or; 

 Ms. Tasia Papajohn at 916-978-5367 

Or any of the above at TDD 916-978-5608 

Sincerely, 

Lawrence J. Bauman 

Manager, Ratesetting Services 

Business Resources Center 

Enclosure 
Subject: Fiscal Year 2002 Water Deliveries and Revenue (WDR) for Project Water 2 

cc: Cachuma Operation and Maintenance Board 

 Attn: Mr. Bob Wignot 

 3301 Laurel Canyon Road 

 Santa Barbara, CA 93105 

 (without enclos.)
### Part B—Services for the Economically Disadvantaged