alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from consolidated financial statements and notes thereto to
Jefferson Savings Bancorp, Inc. at and for the nine months ended
September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       7,322,136
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      22,644,290
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                206,161,095
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                  1,031,713,734  
<ALLOWANCE>                                  6,707,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,317,195,044
<DEPOSITS>                               1,052,840,693 
<SHORT-TERM>                               120,696,679
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         20,004,841
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       101,015
<OTHER-SE>                                 123,551,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,317,195,044 
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             54,993,589
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           11,000,015
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,881,499
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            67,875,103
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          39,707,073
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          42,595,224
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       25,279,879    
<LOAN-LOSSES>                               (1,200,000)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              50,296
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             19,690,557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,098,775
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  10,098,775
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,558,275
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.82
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,059
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,539
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,121,351
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             8,182,268    
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  282,198
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,602
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            6,707,672
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,418,878
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      3,249,959
        

</TABLE>
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


War In The Pacific
National Historical Park
Guam


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  To Commemorate and to Conserve War in the Pacific National Historical Park was established to commemorate the bravery and sacrifice of those participating in the campaigns of the Pacific Theater of World War II and to conserve and interpret outstanding natural, scenic, and historic values and objects of the island of Guam.
Read More
  Current ConditionsCurrent Conditions What Park Ranger events are scheduled? What's the weather forecast? Check our current conditions page for information.
 Guided Web and Cell Phone Park TourGuided Web and Cell Phone Park Tour A guided mobile or web based tour of the all the park units.
 Young snorkeler in Guam's waters.Youth Programs War in the Pacific has a lot of opportunities and programs for kids of all ages!
 An image of the memorial Wall at Asan Bay OverlookThe Full List of Names on Memorial Wall Contains the names of U.S. servicemembers and civilians who died and suffered on Guam in WWII
 A panoramic view of Asan Beach.Planning an Event at the Park? Would you like to reserve a spot for your family barbecue? Planning a commercial filming or photography session? Get permit information.
 Last updated: December 7, 2023
 History Beckons!
 Liberation
Asan Landing on July 21, 1944
 Dogs Go to War
U.S. Marines With Their War Dogs
 Southern Landing
77th Infantry Landing in Agat
 In Search of Japanese Stragglers
Guam Combat Patrol Unit
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 135 Murray Blvd.
Ste. 100
Hagatna,
GU
96910
 Phone: (671) 333 4050 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected
 Explore subjects and stories related to this park
 Subject
Teaching with Historic Places
 Subject
American Military
 Subject
National Historic Landmarks
 Subject
Historic Preservation Fund
 Subject
African American Heritage
 Subject
American Revolution
 Subject
Battlefields
 Subject
World War I
 Subject
Forts


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
### **CHAPTER 155—INJUNCTIONS; THREE-JUDGE COURTS**

Sec.
[2281.
Repealed.]
[2282.
Repealed.]
2283.
Stay of State court proceedings.
2284.
Three-judge district court; when required; composition; procedure. 1

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–381, §4, Aug. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 1119, struck out item 2281 "Injunction against enforcement of State statute; three-judge court required", item 2282 "Injunction against enforcement of Federal statute; three-judge court required", and inserted "when required" after "district court" in item 2284.

1  So in original. Does not conform to section catchline.
Editorial Note on Part 126
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 126.618 How does a certified HUBZone small business concern's participation in a Mentor-Protégé relationship affect its participation in the HUBZone Program? ( a ) A certified HUBZone small business concern may enter into a mentor-protégé relationship under § 125.9 of this chapter or in connection with a mentor-protégé program of another agency, provided that such relationships do not conflict with the HUBZone requirements described in § 126.200.
( b ) For purposes of determining whether an applicant to the HUBZone Program or a certified HUBZone small business concern qualifies as small under part 121 of this chapter, SBA will not find affiliation between the applicant or certified HUBZone small business concern and the firm that is its mentor in an SBA-approved mentor-protégé relationship (including a mentor that is other than small) on the basis of the mentor-protégé agreement or the assistance provided to the protégé firm under the agreement. SBA will not consider the employees of the mentor in determining whether the applicant or certified HUBZone small business concern meets (or continues to meet) the 35% HUBZone residency requirement or the principal office requirement, or in determining the size of the applicant or certified HUBZone small business concern for any employee-based size standard.
( c ) A certified HUBZone small business concern that is a prime contractor on a HUBZone contract may subcontract work to its mentor. ( 1 ) The certified HUBZone small business concern must meet the applicable limitations on subcontracting requirements set forth in § 125.6(c) of this chapter.
( 2 ) SBA may find affiliation between a prime HUBZone contractor and its mentor subcontractor where the mentor will perform primary and vital requirements of the contract. *See* § 121.103(h)(3) of this chapter.
[81 FR 48593, July 25, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 65249, Nov. 26, 2019; 85 FR 66197, Oct. 16, 2020; 88 FR 26213, Apr. 27, 2023]
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 63 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/23/2003 Page 1 of 1
#### § 108.140 SBA approval of initial Management Expenses.

A NMVC Company must have its Management Expenses approved by SBA at the time of designation as a NMVC Company. (See § 108.520 for the definition of Management Expenses.)
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.409 Decision on appeal. ( a ) A decision of the Administrative Law Judge under this subpart is the final agency decision, and is binding on the parties.
( b ) The Administrative Law Judge shall issue a decision, insofar as practicable, within 90 days after an appeal petition is filed.
( c ) The Administrative Law Judge may reconsider an appeal decision within 20 days of the decision if there is a clear showing of an error of fact or law material to the decision.
[63 FR 35766, June 30, 1998. Redesignated and amended at 67 FR 47251, July 18, 2002]
###### Editorial Note on Part 126

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 126.400 Who will conduct program examinations?

SBA field staff or others designated by the D/HUB will conduct program examinations.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund VII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of
one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/S/    LEO F. WELLS,
III                              
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief Executive Officer May 11, 2006



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|/S/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMS                              
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial Officer May 11, 2006
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, James J. Baumberger, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 11, 2004
#### Samuel Goldberg, Landlord-Respondent, v. Charles Fishgold, Tenant-Appellant, and “John Jones” et al., Undertenants-Appellants.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied, with $10 costs. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
No: III-23-014 June 6, 2023

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662 

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663 

NRC to Conduct Open House to Discuss

2022 Performance of Dresden Nuclear Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss the 2022 safety performance of the Dresden 

nuclear power plant during an in person open house scheduled for June 15. The two-unit plant, operated by 

Constellation Energy Generation, is located in Morris, Illinois, approximately 25 miles southwest of Joliet. 

The open house will be held from 5-6 p.m. Central time at the Canalport Community Center, 100 

Nettle Street in Morris. NRC staff responsible for plant inspection and oversight, including the resident 

inspectors based full-time at the site, will participate in the discussion. 

The NRC determined that Dresden operated safely during 2022. All inspection findings and 

performance indicators were “green,” or of very low safety significance. As a result, Dresden remains under 

the NRC’s baseline level of oversight, which entails thousands of hours of inspection each year. 

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to measure 

plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, commensurate with the 

safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or performance indicators with more than very 

low safety significance trigger increased NRC oversight. 

Plant inspections are performed by two NRC resident inspectors and specialist inspectors from the 

agency’s Region III office in Lisle, Illinois. 

The annual assessment letter for Dresden is available on the NRC website. Current performance 

information for Unit 2 and Unit 3 is also available on the NRC website and updated quarterly.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Visit the Spatter Cones

Craters Of The Moon National Monument & Preserve
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Chemistry and Radiation Protection Technician Training and Qualifications

## HPPOS-067 PDR-9111210253

See the memorandum from D. P. Allison to F. A. Wenslawski dated March 28, 1984.

If a technician fills a dual role as a responsible HP / Chem Tech, then 2 years experience in each area is necessary. Common areas may exist so that an experience period of less than 4 years could be acceptable.

Preoperational, design, construction, and startup experience can be counted as well as operational experience. HPPOS-020, HPPOS-062, and HPPOS-096 contain related topics.

Technicians filling responsible positions in a specialty are required to have two years experience in that specialty. Therefore, if a technician is fulfilling a dual role (as a responsible HP / Chem Tech), then a total of four years experience (two in each area) is required by ANSI N18.1-1971. IE understands that common areas of chemistry and radiation protection may exist, so that some experience period less than four years could be acceptable for full, dual-specialty qualification. The overall goal of the TS requirement is to ensure that technicians filling responsible positions have the necessary experience, education, and skill to perform their assigned functions during normal and abnormal conditions.

Nuclear power plant preoperational experience, as well as design, construction, startup, and operations, can count on a one-for-one basis toward the two-year experience requirement defined in Section 4.1 of the ANSI standard.

The licensee must make definitive applicability assessments of any type of experience as it relates to the technicians current or projected job responsibilities. Well documented training programs, structured to specific job functions, should form the basis for licensee qualification assessments.

**Regulatory references:** ANSI N18.1-1971, Technical Specifications

**Subject codes:** 1.1, 1.2

**Applicability:** Reactors

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, October 13, 2017
Exhibit 4.378

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 178213 dated December 11, 2019

 

For Rendering

 

Telematics services

 

This License is granted to

 

Limited Liability Company

 

Zelenaya Tochka Belgorod (Zelenaya Tochka Group)

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1143123020270

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

3123355954

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

17u, Gubkina str., Belgorod, Belgorod region, 308033

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until December 11, 2024.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated October 31, 2019 No. 644-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here 
    	
 
    
	
Official seal: 
    MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS 
   COMMUNICATIONS 
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE 
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION 
   TECHNOLOGY 
   AND MASS MEDIA 
   PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 115300
§ 9269.3-5 Timber management. ( a ) *Sales of forest products; general.* [Reserved]
( b ) *Non-sale disposals; general* — ( 1 ) *Unauthorized cutting of timber-mineral and non-mineral lands.* ( i ) The cutting or removing of the timber referred to in §§ 5511.1 to 5511.1-4 of this title in any other manner than that authorized by such sections will be considered a trespass.
( ii ) The cutting of timber for sale and speculation, or for use by others than the permittee, is strictly prohibited.
( iii ) Where permits are secured by fraud or timber is not used in accordance with § 5511.1-4 of this title, the Government will enforce the same civil and criminal liabilities as in other cases of timber trespass upon public lands.
( 2 ) *Unauthorized cutting of timber—Alaska.* The cutting of the timber from the public land in Alaska, other than in accordance with the terms of the law and §§ 5511.2 to 5511.2-6 of this title shall render the persons responsible for trespass and such persons may be prosecuted criminally under title 18 U.S.C., (see § 9265.5(d) of this title), or under State law.
#### § 127.101 What type of assistance is available under this part?

This part authorizes contracting officers to restrict competition or award sole source contracts or orders to eligible Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Businesses (EDWOSBs) for certain Federal contracts or orders in industries in which the Small Business Administration (SBA) determines that WOSBs are underrepresented in Federal procurement. It also authorizes contracting officers to restrict competition or award sole source contracts or orders to eligible WOSBs for certain Federal contracts or orders in industries in which SBA determines that WOSBs are substantially underrepresented in Federal procurement and has waived the economically disadvantaged requirement.

[80 FR 55021, Sept. 14, 2015]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alexander Picone, Appellant.

Ho opinion. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
### §40a. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862

Section, act Aug. 27, 1935, ch. 740, §204, 49 Stat. 878, related to remission or mitigation of forfeiture of a seized vehicle or aircraft. See section 3668 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Sept. 1, 1948, see act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §20, 62 Stat. 862.