UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING

56 Forsyth Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

David J. Smith

Clerk of Court 

September 27, 2021

For rules and forms visit

www.ca11.uscourts.gov

Clerk - Southern District of Florida

U.S. District Court 

400 N MIAMI AVE

MIAMI, FL 33128-1810

Appeal Number: 21-12580-JJ

Case Style: Jeffrey LaGrasso, et al v. Seven Bridges Homeowners Associations Inc.

District Court Docket No: 9:20-cv-81163-WM

The enclosed copy of this Court's Order of Dismissal is issued as the mandate of this court. See

11th Cir. R. 41-4. Counsel and pro se parties are advised that pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 27-2, "a 

motion to reconsider, vacate, or modify an order must be filed within 21 days of the entry of 

such order. No additional time shall be allowed for mailing."

Sincerely,

DAVID J. SMITH, Clerk of Court

Reply to: Tiffany A. Tucker, JJ/lt

Phone #: (404)335-6193

Enclosure(s) 

DIS-4 Multi-purpose dismissal letter

USCA11 Case: 21-12580 Date Filed: 09/27/2021 Page: 1 of 1

K.P. Sep 27, 2021 Miami

Case 9:20-cv-81163-WM Document 230 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2021 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 21-12580-JJ

________________________

JEFFREY LAGRASSO,

DEBORAH LAGRASSO,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

SEVEN BRIDGES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

Before: WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

BY HE COURT:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Jeffrey LaGrasso and 

Deborah LaGrasso appeal from the district court’s orders granting partial summary judgment to 

Seven Bridges Homeowners Associations Inc. (“Seven Bridges”), declining to grant summary 

judgment to either party on the remaining claim, denying the LaGrassos’ Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 59(e) motion to alter or amend, and entering judgment as to one claim based on its 

partial grant of summary judgment. These orders were not final because the LaGrassos’ complaint 

is still pending as to their remaining claim, and the district court did not certify its partial grant of 

summary judgment for immediate appeal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). See 28 

USCA11 Case: 21-12580 Date Filed: 09/27/2021 Page: 1 of 2

Case 9:20-cv-81163-WM Document 230 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2021 Page 2 of 3
2

U.S.C. § 1291; World Fuel Corp. v. Geithner, 568 F.3d 1345, 1348 (11th Cir. 2009); Supreme 

Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1245–46 (11th Cir. 2012); Broussard v. Lippman, 

643 F.2d 1131, 1133 (5th Cir. Unit A Apr. 1981). Nor are the orders appealable under the collateral 

order doctrine. See Mohawk Indus., Inc. v. Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100, 106 (2009).

Any pending motions are DENIED as moot. No motion for reconsideration may be filed

unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 27-2 and all other

applicable rules.

USCA11 Case: 21-12580 Date Filed: 09/27/2021 Page: 2 of 2

Case 9:20-cv-81163-WM Document 230 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2021 Page 3 of 3