alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kaiser Ventures LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), we, Richard E. Stoddard, Chief Executive Officer and James F. Verhey, Chief Financial Officer of Kaiser Ventures LLC (the
Company), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 30, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard E. Stoddard                 
|                     |  |  |  | Richard E. Stoddard                     
|                     |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board, President & CEO  
|                     |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | /s/ James F. Verhey                     
|                     |  |  |  | James F. Verhey                         
|                     |  |  |  | Executive Vice President  CFO          
|                     |  |  |  | Principal Financial & Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic, version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, the deemed filed by the Company for purposed of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporated it by
reference.
#### 245 East 37th Street, Inc., Respondent, v. Fireman’s Fund Indemnity Co., Appellant.

The pleadings in the action brought by respondent’s former tenant sufficiently alleged, *inter alia,*a claim for damages against respondent for bodily injuries caused by accident, within the meaning of appellant’s policy; and on appellant’s refusal to defend such action, insofar as it related to such claim, respondent is entitled to recover his necessary expenses, insofar as they were incurred in such defense, to be determined on an assessment *714of damages as directed hy the City Court. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ. [See *post,*p. 770.]
**** **EXHIBIT
31.1**   **SECTION
302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 I,
Jeffrey E. Coombs, certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Insightful
      Corporation;
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant
      and have:
 
 a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and
 
 5.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
      committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
      the equivalent function):
 
 a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls over financial reporting.
 
 Date:
    May
      10, 2005
    
    By:
    /s/
      Jeffrey E. CoombsJeffrey
      E. CoombsPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
From: Spenillo, Justin

Sent: <via email>

To: <identified interested parties>

Cc: Palma, Elizabeth; Mark Boyle

Subject: Air Quality in West Silver Valley Idaho

Thank you for your interest in air quality in the Pinehurst, Idaho area (West Silver Valley). A number of

individuals have communicated their thoughts regarding the proposed nonattainment area, and we very

much appreciate you taking the time to contact us.

The EPA and Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) staff are committed to working with

you and your community to reduce fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) air pollution, and to protect public

health in the West Silver Valley. Since the beginning of the year, EPA and IDEQ staff have been working

together to better understand the air quality issues in the general Silver Valley area.

As you may know, on August 19, 2014, the EPA sent a letter identifying its intent to designate the West

Silver Valley as not meeting the 2012 PM 2.5 standard. We based this intended designation on extensive

collaboration with the IDEQ and technical information including monitored air quality data and technical

analyses. EPA invited public comment on this preliminary decision and the associated supporting

documentation. IDEQ staff have been holding community meetings in the West Silver Valley since the

spring, and they have indicated that they will continue to sponsor meetings if the West Silver Valley is

designated nonattainment.

If the West Silver Valley is designated nonattainment (not meeting the standard), Idaho would need to

develop a plan to improve air quality. This process to identify how to reduce PM 2.5 in the West Silver

Valley would not begin until 2015. Both IDEQ and EPA staff will be in close contact with your

communities, and your concerns and input will be considered if and when IDEQ, with community input,

develops a plan to reduce emissions in the proposed West Silver Valley nonattainment area.

Resources :

 EPA’s West Silver Valley Technical information document -

http://air.idaho.gov/media/1117959/epa-t echnical-support-documen t-nonattainment-westsilver-valley-0814.pdf

 IDEQ’s West Silver Valley Air Quality webpa ge including Community Advisory Committee

information- http://air.idaho.gov/regional-o ffices-issues/coeur-dalene/air-quality-west-silvervalley.aspx

 Area designations process

- http://www.epa.gov/airquality/particlepolluti on/designations/2012sta ndards/index.htm

 Current real time information on local air quality - http://www.airnow.gov

 IDEQ contacts: Mark Boyle mark.boyle@deq .idaho.gov (208) 666-4607, and Ralph Paul

ralph.paul@deq.idaho.gov (208) 666-4609

 EPA contacts: Mike McGown mcgown.michael @epa.gov (208) 378-5764, Justin Spenillo

Spenillo.justin@epa.gov (206) 553-6125

Justin A. Spenillo - US EPA

spenillo.justin@epa.gov 206.553.6125

Air Planning Unit, Office of Air Waste and Toxics

Seattle WA – Region 10
### §1410. Venue of cases ancillary to foreign proceedings

A case under chapter 15 of title 11 may be commenced in the district court of the United States for the district—

(1) in which the debtor has its principal place of business or principal assets in the United States;

(2) if the debtor does not have a place of business or assets in the United States, in which there is pending against the debtor an action or proceeding in a Federal or State court; or

(3) in a case other than those specified in paragraph (1) or (2), in which venue will be consistent with the interests of justice and the convenience of the parties, having regard to the relief sought by the foreign representative.

(Added Pub. L. 98–353, title I, §102(a), July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 335; amended Pub. L. 109–8, title VIII, §802(c)(4), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 146.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–8 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to venue of cases commenced under section 304 of title 11.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2005 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under Title 11, Bankruptcy, before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of Title 11.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 10, 1984, see section 122(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 151 of this title.
#### Hyman Bernstein, Individually and as President, et al., v. Madison Baking Co., Inc., et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Case 1:20-cv-22209-CMA Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/27/2020 Page 1 of 1
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid

(2005/C 329/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-21289-COOKE/GOODMAN

ALFRED POLLACK, 

Plaintiff

vs.

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social

Security,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS MATTER is before me upon the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 

the Honorable Jonathan Goodman, U.S. Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 22. The R&R concerns

the parties’ motions for summary judgement, ECF Nos. 17; 18, Defendant’s unopposed 

motion to withdraw their motion for summary judgement, ECF No. 20, and Defendant’s 

unopposed motion to remand, ECF No. 21. 

In his R&R, Judge Goodman recommends that I allow the withdrawal of 

Defendant’s summary judgement motion, substitute the summary judgement motion with 

Defendant’s motion to remand, grant Defendant’s motion to remand, and enter a judgement 

of remand of the cause to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings.

ECF No. 22 at 2. The parties have not filed objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has 

passed. 

I have reviewed parties’ motions, the briefing and accompanying exhibits, Judge

Goodman’s R&R, the record, and the relevant legal authorities. Having done so, I find 

Judge Goodman’s R&R to be clear, cogent, and compelling. 

Accordingly, Judge Goodman’s R&R, ECF No. 22, is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED

as the Order of this Court. It is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

1. The Court will GRANT Defendant’s motion to withdraw, WITHDRAW

Defendant’s motion for summary judgement and SUBSTITUTE Defendant’s 

Case 1:20-cv-21289-MGC Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

motion for summary judgement with the motion to remand.

2. The Court will GRANT the motion to remand and REMAND this action to the 

Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings.

In addition, the Court will DENY without prejudice Plaintiff’s motion for summary 

judgement, ECF No. 17. The Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case.

DONE and ORDERED in chambers, at Miami, Florida, this 19

th day of May 2021.

Copies furnished to:

Jonathan Goodman, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-21289-MGC Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2021 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

Case No.: 1:20-cv-22603-GOODMAN

[CONSENT]

Erik Chavez, et al., 

Plaintiff,

vs.

Grill Enterprises, LLC, et al., 

Defendants.

PLAINTIFFS’ [PROPOSED] SPECIAL VERDICT FORM

PAYMENT OF MINIMUM HOURLY WAGE

Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence:

1. That Defendants failed to fully pay Leonel Diaz the minimum hourly wage due on 

any regularly scheduled pay day, as required by law?

Answer Yes or No _____________

2. That Defendants required or facilitated Leonel Diaz’s participation in an invalid 

“tip pool”?

Answer Yes or No _____________

3. That Defendants kept any portion of Leonel Diaz’s tips?

Answer Yes or No _____________

Case 1:20-cv-22603-JG Document 178-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

4. If you answered “Yes” to either question 1, 2, or 3, above, do you find that the 

Defendants acted willfully?

 Answer Yes or No _____________

5. If your answer to question 1, 2, or 3, above, is YES, how much is Leonel Diaz due 

on account of unpaid minimum wages?

$_____________

6. Do you find that Defendant Ruben Sierra is an employer of Leonel Diaz by virtue 

of his operational control over the restaurant? 

Answer Yes or No _____________

SO SAY WE ALL.

___________________________

Foreperson’s Signature

DATE: ___________________

Case 1:20-cv-22603-JG Document 178-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2023 Page 2 of 2
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN ; L2-h 3 . y > A-- :, 

\~ 

Qrnlur c. MANW 

L-n .rllOU\L Ynrch 27. 1939 

Yonorable 1. i. Roberts 

County Auditor 

Boresr, ;-"exes
No: 23-079 December 13, 2023 

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200 

NRC Ends Probation of Mississippi’s Agreement State Regulatory Program;

Heightened Oversight to Continue

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is discontinuing probation on Mississippi’s 

program for regulating the use of radioactive materials. This decision is the result of an NRC 

review earlier this year, which found that the state has made significant progress in addressing 

several areas of unsatisfactory performance. 

The NRC placed Mississippi’s program on probation in September 2022, marking the 

second time the agency has taken such action.

Mississippi’s “Agreement State” program will remain under heightened oversight, which 

involves frequent interaction with the NRC staff, including bimonthly conference calls and 

periodic status reports. The NRC will formally review Mississippi’s progress again in 

approximately two years. 

Mississippi is one of 39 states that have entered into agreements with the NRC to provide 

them with the regulatory authority to license and regulate certain nuclear materials users within 

their borders. The NRC retains an oversight role and periodically assesses the states’ programs 

for adequacy and compatibility with NRC regulations. The NRC also maintains responsibility for 

regulating commercial nuclear power plants. 

Last year’s NRC review of Mississippi’s program concluded it was “adequate to protect 

public health and safety but needs improvement and not compatible with the NRC’s program.” 

This year’s review noted significant improvements in inspection, licensing, staff training, and 

incident and allegation handling. 

The NRC staff’s 2023 report on Mississippi’s program, the Commission’s approval of the 

staff’s recommendation to discontinue probation, and NRC Chair Christopher Hanson’s letter to 

Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves are available on the NRC website.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Voyageurs
National Park
Minnesota


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Park Stores
 Two photos of the different Visitor Centers' bookstores. On the left picture there is a taxidermy Moose standing tall in an open area facing the bookstore with stands full of books and tshirts. On the right photo there are bookstands in a wooden building.Bookstores in the Rainy Lake Visitor Center (left) and Ash River Visitor Center (right). JNPA/NPS

A round logo with a Blue, Purple, and White compass rose surrounded by text reading "Jefferson National Parks Association".JNPA/NPSJefferson National Parks Association
Jefferson National Park's Association (JNPA), a non-profit partner of the National Park Service, operates three bookstores within Voyageurs National Park. Each store carries a curated selection of quality educational products and books that will help extend visitors’ park experience. You can explore the full range of products during your park visit or by shopping at JNPA’s on-line store. Your purchases in the park and online directly support educational programs, events and site improvements at Voyageurs.
The stores are located at all three Voyageurs National Park Visitor Centers: Rainy Lake Visitor Center, Kabetogama Lake Visitor Center and Ash River Visitor Center. Check out our Operating Hours and Seasons page for visitor center operations for access to the bookstores.
 Last updated: December 19, 2022
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: Voyageurs National Park Headquarters
360 Hwy 11 East
International Falls,
MN
56649
 Phone: (218)-283-6600 Contact Us
 Tools Site Index
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4826 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4826

  To amend the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003 to modify the 
             definition of the term ``at-risk community''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2022

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself and Mr. Daines) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003 to modify the 
             definition of the term ``at-risk community''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Wildfire Protection Act of 
2022''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF AT-RISK COMMUNITY.

    Section 101(1) of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003 (16 
U.S.C. 6511(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (A); and
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as 
        subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
Dunes Drive Map National Park Service

Department of the Interior

White Sands National Park

0km

0mi

Alkali Flat 

Trail

Amphitheater

Anfiteatro

Roadrunner Picnic Area

Área de picnic Roadrunner

Primrose Picnic Area

Área de picnic Primrose

Group Use Area

reservations required

Zona para grupos 

requiere reservaciones

West Filming Area

Area 19

Backcountry

Camping

Loop Trail

Sendero de sitios 

remotos para acampar

2 miles (3.5 km)

Sunset Stroll 

Meeting Area

Zona de reunión para 

el Sunset Stroll

End of Pavement

Interdune Boardwalk

Sendero tablado elevado

0.4 miles (650m)

Dune Life 

Nature

Trail

Sendero

autoguiado 

Dune Life

1 mile (1.6 km) Playa Trail

Sendero Playa

0.5 miles (800m)

Taquilla

de entrada

Fee 

Station

Visitor Center

Centro de visitantes

To Las Cruces (45mi)

A Las Cruces (72km) A Alamogordo (23km)

To Alamogordo (14mi)

Fin del pavimento

Sendero Alkali 

Flat

5 miles (8 km)

Yucca Picnic Area

Área de picnic Yuca

8mi

12.8m

70

Gift Shop

Tienda

LEGEND CLAVE

Parking Areas

Estacionamientos

Special Use Areas 

(Reservation Required)

Áreas de uso especial

(Requiere reservacion)

Horse Area

Área de caballos

Entrance Gate

Portón de entrada

Área de Filmación Oeste

Área 19

Revised 8/16/2022
§ 306.3 Application requirements. ( a ) EDA will provide Investment Assistance under this subpart for the period of time required to complete the Project's scope of work, generally not to exceed 12 to 18 months.
( b ) For a Project of significant Regional or national scope, EDA may waive the requirement set forth in § 301.2(b) of this chapter that the non-profit organization act in cooperation with officials of a political subdivision of a State.
( c ) The Investment Rate for Investments under this subpart shall be determined in accordance with § 301.4(b)(4) of this chapter.
[71 FR 56675, Sept. 27, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 76132, Dec. 19, 2014]