alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1:20-cv-22615-WILLIAMS

MALAUBE, LLC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GREENWICH INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

 /

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff, Malaube, LLC, by and through its undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Rule 

41(a)(1)(A)(i), Fed. R. Civ. P., hereby voluntarily dismisses this action without prejudice. 

Respectfully submitted,

HERSKOWITZ SHAPIRO

Two Datran Center

9130 S. Dadeland Blvd., Suite 1609

Miami, FL 33156

t: (305) 423-1986; f: (305) 670-3884

By: /s/ Lyle E. Shapiro

 LYLE. SHAPIRO 

 Florida Bar No: 120324 

lyle@hslawfl.com

KRYSTINA T. ENDARA 

Florida Bar No.: 1004139 

krystina@hslawl.com

AND

Case 1:20-cv-22615-KMW Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

GALLUP AUERBACH

4000 Hollywood Boulevard Presidential 

Circle-Suite 265 South Hollywood, 

Florida 33021

t: 954-894-3035; f: 954-894-8015

By: /s/ Jacob K . Auerbach JACOB 

K. AUERBACH Florida Bar 

No: 084003 jauerbach@galluplaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

WE HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 8, 2020, we electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day on all counsel of record indicated in the attached service list via transmission

of Notice of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.

/s/ Lyle E. Shapiro 

Lyle E. Shapiro

Case 1:20-cv-22615-KMW Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2020 Page 2 of 2
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 49 

To prohibit the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection from overseeing 

lending institutions’ participation in the Paycheck Protection Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2021 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

from overseeing lending institutions’ participation in the 

Paycheck Protection Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No CFPB in the PPP 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CFPB OVERSIGHT OF LENDING IN7 STITUTIONS PARTICIPATING IN THE PPP. 

8 The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection shall 

9 not have the authority to— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 49 IS

1 (1) assess, audit, review, or examine any part 

2 of the participation of a lender in any program es3 tablished under paragraph (36) or (37) of section 

4 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)); 

5 or 

6 (2) levy fees or fines against a lender due to 

7 any action of the lender under any program de8 scribed in paragraph (1). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 

CASE NO. 20-CV-22783-BB

KATHRYN BIRREN AND

MANDY BIRREN,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD.,

A Liberian Corporation,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF, MANDY BIRREN’S,

MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff, MANDY BIRREN’S, Motion for 

Voluntary Dismissal filed March 31, 2022.

The Court, having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised in the premises, hereby 

ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows:

1. Plaintiff, MANDY BIRREN’S, Motion for Voluntary Dismissal is hereby granted.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Miami, Florida this ____ of March 2022.

_______________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 156-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/31/2022 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT A

Case 0:20-cv-61241-RAR Document 95-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2022 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 0:20-cv-61241-RUIZ

APRIL HICKS,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

THIS MATTER came before the Court on January 24, 25, and 26, 2022, for a bench trial. 

After careful review and consideration of all of the facts and evidence presented during the trial, 

it is hereby,

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court adopts the findings of fact and conclusions 

of law pertaining to liability announced on the record on January 26, 2022, at the conclusion of 

the bench trial, and rules in favor of the Defendant, United States of America. The Court defers 

entering a final judgment until the Parties notify the Court whether a trial on damages relating to 

Defendant’s Counterclaim is necessary.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, in Miami, Florida, this ___ day of ____________, 

2022.

_________________________________

PAUL C. HUCK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies provided to: Counsel of Record

Case 0:20-cv-61241-RAR Document 95-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2022 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission of Fine Arts

The next meeting of the Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for 21 October 2004 at 10 a.m. in the Commission's offices at the National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion affecting the appearance of Washington, DC, may include buildings, parks and memorials. 

                    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission are available on our Web site:                     *http://www.cfa.gov.*                     Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be addressed to Frederick J. Lindstrom, Acting Secretary, Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address or call (202) 504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.                 

Dated in Washington, DC, 28 September 2004. 

Frederick J. Lindstrom, 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-22810  Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
-cr-06218-NCR Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2000 P
-cr-06218-NCR Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2000 P
§ 5402.0-6 Policy. ( a ) When it is determined by the authorized officer to be in the public interest, he may sell at not less than the appraised value, without advertising or calling for bids, timber where the contract is for the sale of less than 250 M board feet.
( b ) Timber on the right-of-way of a logging road and danger trees adjacent to the right-of-way on O. and C. lands may be sold at not less than the appraised value without advertising or calling for bids to ( 1 ) permittee who constructs a road pursuant to a permit issued under Subpart 2800 of this chapter, or
( 2 ) a contractor who is constructing a road with Government funds.
( c ) In addition to paragraph (b) of this section, negotiated sales with no limitations as to volume may be made if: ( 1 ) The contract is for the disposal of materials to be used in connection with a public works improvement program on behalf of a Federal, State or local government agency and the public exigency will not permit the delay incident to advertising; or if
( 2 ) The contract is for the disposal of timber or other vegetative resources, for which it is impracticable to obtain competition.
( d ) All negotiated sales shall be subject to the restrictions relating to the export and substitution from the United States of unprocessed timber.
( e ) Special forest products, including firewood, Christmas trees, boughs, greenery, mushrooms, and other similar vegetative resources, may be sold by permit, without appraisal, after payment to the Government of adequate compensation for the material and may include the expense of issuance of the permit.
[35 FR 9784, June 13, 1970, as amended at 41 FR 12660, Mar. 26, 1976; 56 FR 10175, Mar. 11, 1991; 85 FR 82373, Dec. 18, 2020]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

Case Number: 20-22935-CIV-MORENO

WINDY LUCIUS, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

MOD SUPER FAST PIZZA, LLC,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND 

ORDER DENYING ALL PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Notice of Settlement (D.E. 9), filed on

September 8, 2020. It is

ADJUDGED that in light of the parties settling this action, this case is DISMISSED in 

accordance with the settlement agreement. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for six months to 

enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. It is also 

ADJUDGED that all pending motions are DENIED as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 17th of September 2020.

______________________________________

FEDERICO A. MORENO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-22935-FAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2020 Page 1 of 1
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Southern District of Florida

DAVID “RYAN” MCCAIGUE, an individual

DOENCH WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC;

and BRIAN H. DOENCH, an individual

BRIAN H. DOENCH

1712 Mattox Court

Charlottesville, Virginia 22903

David C. Silver, Esq.

Silver Miller

11780 W. Sample Road

Coral Springs, FL 33065

E-mail: DSilver@SilverMillerLaw.com

Case 0:20-cv-61321-WPD Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2020 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00

Case 0:20-cv-61321-WPD Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2020 Page 2 of 2
----

Action brought on 22 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Hellenic Republic

(Case C-352/05)

(2005/C 281/24)

Language of the case: Greek

An action against the Hellenic Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 22 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by M. Patakia, Legal Adviser in its Legal Service, and B. Schima, a member of its Legal Service, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing the directive into the national legal system expired on 1 July 2004.

----

(1)OJ L 176 of 15.7.2003, p. 37.

----
### **CHAPTER 131—RULES OF COURTS**

Sec.
2071.
Rule-making power generally.
2072.
Rules of procedure and evidence; power to prescribe.
2073.
Rules of procedure and evidence; method of prescribing.
2074.
Rules of procedure and evidence; submission to Congress; effective date.
2075.
Bankruptcy rules.
[2076.
Repealed.]
2077.
Publication of rules; advisory committees.

#### Amendments

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–702, title IV, §401(d), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4650, added items 2072 to 2075 and struck out former items 2072 "Rules of civil procedure", 2075 "Bankruptcy rules", and 2076 "Rules of evidence".

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–164, title II, §208(b), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 55, added item 2077.

**1975**—Pub. L. 93–595, §2(a)(2), Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949, added item 2076.

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–773, §3, Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1323, struck out "for district courts" in item 2072 and struck out items 2073 and 2074.

**1964**—Pub. L. 88–623, §2, Oct. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 1001, added item 2075.

**1954**—Act July 27, 1954, ch. 583, §2, 68 Stat. 567, added item 2074.
#### Frances M. Orth et al., Respondents, v. Kane Construction Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — -Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See *post,*p. 822.]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

CASE NO. 20-61249 -CIV-DIMITROULEAS

JHON SARMIENTO, Individually and 

on behalf of all others similary situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SCHEAR CONSTRUCTION, LLC, a 

Florida Limited Liability Company,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF CONSENT TO JOIN

Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Civil Procedure 

for the Southern District of Florida, Plaintiff, Jhon Sarmiento, hereby notifies this Court of the 

withdrawal of the Consent to Join for Opt-in Plaintiff, Gonzalo Gimenez. [See D.E. 23-1].

Respectfully submitted this 23rd day of August, 2021.

Respectfully Submitted, 

/s/ ANDREW R. FRISCH

Andrew R. Frisch, Esq.

MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A

8151 Peters Road, Suite 4000

Plantation, FL 33324

T (954) 318-0268; F (954) 327-30313

afrisch@forthepeople.com 

Case 0:20-cv-61249-WPD Document 46 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2021 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFIY that on this 23rd day of August, 2021, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of 

electronic filing to all counsel of record.

 

 /s/ Andrew R. Frisch 

 Andrew R. Frisch

Case 0:20-cv-61249-WPD Document 46 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2021 Page 2 of 2
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Consideration of NRC Independent Measurement Samples as "Research" Pursuant to 49 CFR 175.700 (c) and 172.204 (c) (4)

## HPPOS-161 PDR-9111220147

See the memorandum from A. W. Gella to J. Buchanan dated September 4, 1986.

The memo, presented in its entirety, expresses a DOT informal opinion that independent measurement samples collected by NRC inspectors may be considered as materials used in research per 49 CFR 172.204 (c) (4) and 10 CFR 175.700 (c). Therefore, these samples may be shipped on passenger-carrying aircraft.

As agreed to in our conversation on August 27, 1986, on that date I contacted Mr. Walt Greiner, the Hazardous Materials Specialist of FAA Headquarters. My question to him was whether or not the independent measurement samples collected by NRC inspectors could legitimately be considered as "research" pursuant to the subject regulation, and therefore, allowable as freight to be offered for transport aboard passenger-carrying aircraft.

After describing the sampling program and type of samples, materials involved, etc., as well as the purpose of the samples, he gave his opinion that the samples could be considered as "research." I therefore recommend that this be the case and that such a position continue to be taken with regard to Section 05.04 (d) of MC 1232, currently under revision and the subject DOT regulation.

**Regulatory references:** 49 CFR 172.204, 49 CFR 175.700

**Subject codes:** 12.13, 12.17, 12.18

**Applicability:** All

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 16, 2017
#### § 315.14 Conflicts of interest.

EDA will provide no Adjustment Assistance to any Firm under this part unless the owners, partners, members, directors, or officers thereof execute an agreement binding them and the Firm for a period of two years after such Adjustment Assistance is provided, to refrain from employing, tendering any office or employment to, or retaining for professional services any Person who, on the date such assistance or any part thereof was provided, or within one year prior thereto, shall have served as an officer, attorney, agent, or employee occupying a position or engaging in activities which involved discretion with respect to the provision of such Adjustment Assistance.
455 P.2d 837

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilbert SANDOVAL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 8790.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

June 16, 1969.

Calvin R. Néurriann,' Clovis, ■ for appellant.

James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Robert J. Laughlin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellee.

OPINION

NOBLE, Chief Justice.

Petitioner, Gilbert Sandoval, seeks by a Rule’93 petition (§ 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A. 1953, Supp. 1967) to have an enhanced sentence of life imprisonment, following his conviction of burglary and proof of three prior felony convictions, set aside because of asserted comments by the district attor-' ney concerning the defendant's failure to testify in his own behalf. • ■

Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 14 L.Ed.2d 106; holds that the Federal Constitution forbids either comment by the prosecution on the accused’s silence or instructions by the court that such silence is evidence of guilt. This petitioner appealed his conviction, State v. Sandoval, 76 N.M. 570, 417 P.2d 56, asserting error by reason of comment by the district attorney on his failure to testify. No record was made of the arguments of counsel. We, accordingly, denied his contention as being unsupported by the record. He now asserts two grounds for relief -by his Rule 93 motion, (1) that his sentence itnder § 40A-29-5 through § 40A-29-8, N.M.S.A. 1953, is discriminatory and violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution, and (2) that his conviction and sentence must be vacated because of comments by the district attorney on the defendant’s failure to testify.

Petitioner’s contention that the habitual criminal act is discriminatory and in violation of the equal protection clause of the Constitution was ruled against him in State v. Baldonado, 79 N.M. 175, 441 P.2d 215 (Ct. App. 1968).

After a hearing on the motion for post-conviction relief, the judge, who presided during defendant’s trial, determined that the evidence presented at the *334Hearing was not sufficient to establish any comment by the district attorney which infringed upon the defendant’s constitutional right not to testify in his own behalf. In State v. Chavez, 78 N.M. 446, 432 P.2d 411, we said that the trial court — not the appellate court — is the judge of the credibility of the witnesses and of the weight to be given evidence at a hearing for post-conviction relief. We also said that the petitioner has the burden of establishing his claims. Our review of the record of the post-conviction hearing convinces us that the evidence of any comment made by the district attorney concerning defendant’s failure to testify is, to say the least, very unsatisfactory.

It follows that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

COMPTON and WATSON, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Medicare Payment Advisory Commission

# AGENCY:

Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Commission will hold its next public meeting on Thursday, October 28, 2004, and Friday, October 29, 2004, at the Ronald Reagan Building, International Trade Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The meeting is tentative scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. on October 28, and at 9 a.m. on October 29.

Topics for discussion include findings on congressionally mandated studies including: specialty hospitals; certified registered nurse first assistants; physician practice expense; cardiothoracic surgeons, and direct access to physical therapy. Additional presentations will include hospital quality, initial findings on private plans' use of imaging services, and a panel on health information technology. The Commission will also begin discussion on payment adequacy for various Medicare providers.

                        Agendas will be e-mailed approximately one week prior to the meeting. The final agenda will be available on the Commission's Web site                         *(www.MedPAC.gov).*

# ADDRESSES:

MedPAC's address is: 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Suite 9000, Washington, DC 20001. The telephone number is (202) 220-3700.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Diane Ellison, Office Manager, (202) 220-3700.

Sarah S. Thomas,

Deputy Director.

[FR Doc. 04-23205  Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-BW-M
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 20

**Question 20:** Pertaining to Question 19, will 10 CFR 50 Appendix I and Technical Specifications have to be modified to reflect a total effective dose equivalent (TEDE)?

**Answer:** Appendix I, and the corresponding Technical Specifications, will not have to be modified as a result of the revised Part 20; however, the staff is considering whether Appendix I design objectives need to be recast as effective dose equivalent.

(References: 10 CFR 50 Appendix I, Reactor Technical Specifications)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, November 08, 2017