alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-cv-22785-UU

VICTOR ARIZA, 

Plaintiff,

Vs.

YARDHOUSE USA, INC,

a foreign for-profit corporation,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby provides notice 

that the parties have reached a settlement in principle and will be executing necessary paperwork 

resolving all claims and matters in the case. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the 

Court stay all further proceedings for twenty (20) days for the parties to complete the settlement 

paperwork and file a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice.

DATED: September 25, 2020.

Respectfully submitted, 

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO

Counsel for Plaintiff DURAN, P.A.

4800 N. Hiatus Road Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

Sunrise, FL 33351 4640 N.W. 7th Street

T. 954/362-3800 Miami, FL 33126-2309

954/362-3779 (Facsimile) T. 305/266-9780 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com 305/269-8311 (Facsimile)

Email: pduran@pelayoduran.com

By____s/ Roderick V. Hannah __ By ___s/ Pelayo M. Duran ______

RODERICK V. HANNAH PELAYO M. DURAN

Fla. Bar No. 435384 Fla. Bar No. 0146595

Case 1:20-cv-22785-UU Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 25th day of September, 2020, a true and correct of the 

foregoing was electronically filed and served via transmission of Notice of Electronic Filing 

generated by CM/ECF on all counsel or parties of record on the Service List below:

Nicole Sieb Smith, Esq.

RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL, P.A.

101 North Monroe Street, Suite 120

Tallahassee, FL 32301

(850) 222-6550

nsmith@rumberger.com

Attorneys for Defendant

YARDHOUSE USA, INC.

.

/s/ Roderick V. Hannah

 Roderick V. Hannah

Case 1:20-cv-22785-UU Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 2 of 2
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-24-00013-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 467th District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21-11159-467

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

KHODR SAFA, Appellant

V.

LOUDY TAMER, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On February 8, 2024, we notified appellant that the trial-court clerk responsible 

for preparing the record in this appeal had informed us that appellant had not 

arranged to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.3(a)(2). In our notice, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution unless, by February 20, 2024, appellant arranged to pay for the clerk’s 

record and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b), 

44.3.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, 

we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 

42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: March 14, 2024
### §7621. Internal revenue districts

#### (a) Establishment and alteration

The President shall establish convenient internal revenue districts for the purpose of administering the internal revenue laws. The President may from time to time alter such districts.

#### (b) Boundaries

For the purpose mentioned in subsection (a), the President may subdivide any State, or the District of Columbia, or may unite into one district two or more States.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 904; Pub. L. 86–70, §22(e), June 25, 1959, 73 Stat. 146; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(a)(53), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1832.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "Territory" after "any State" and "or a Territory and one or more States" after "two or more States".

1959—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 86–70 substituted "may unite into one district two or more States or a Territory and one or more States" for "may unite two or more States or Territories into one district".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1959 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 86–70 effective Jan. 3, 1959, see section 22(i) of Pub. L. 86–70, set out as a note under section 3121 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation to Secretary of the Treasury of authority vested in President by this section, see section 1(g) of Ex. Ord. No. 10289, Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R. 9499, as amended, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsResolution of the 1D regularized Burgers equation using a spatial wavelet approximationThe Burgers equation with a small viscosity term, initial and periodic boundary conditions is resolved using a spatial approximation constructed from an orthonormal basis of wavelets. The algorithm is directly derived from the notions of multiresolution analysis and tree algorithms. Before the numerical algorithm is described these notions are first recalled. The method uses extensively the localization properties of the wavelets in the physical and Fourier spaces. Moreover, the authors take advantage of the fact that the involved linear operators have constant coefficients. Finally, the algorithm can be considered as a time marching version of the tree algorithm. The most important point is that an adaptive version of the algorithm exists: it allows one to reduce in a significant way the number of degrees of freedom required for a good computation of the solution. Numerical results and description of the different elements of the algorithm are provided in combination with different mathematical comments on the method and some comparison with more classical numerical algorithms.Document ID19910007351Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLiandrat, J.*(Aix-Marseilles Univ. (France). Marseilles, France)*Tchamitchian, PH.*(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:187480ICASE-90-83NASA-CR-187480AD-A231566Accession Number91N16664Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18605CONTRACT_GRANT: AF-AFOSR-0093-90Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910007351.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### McCAIN, Respondent, v. DAKOTA POWER COMPANY, Appellant.

(200 N. W. 912.)

(File No. 5480.

Opinion filed December 2, 1924.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pennington County.

*Maurice M. McKee*and *Williams, Sweet & Tscharner,*all of Rapid City, for Respondent.

*574*Schrader & Lewis, and George E. Flavin,*all of Rapid City, for Appellant.

PER CURIAM-.

This is an appeal from the judgment and order of the circuit court of Pennington county.

Notice of appeal was duly served and filed in this case on the 8th day of August, 1923, and the settled record completed on the 4th day of August, 1923. No other papers have been filed in this case.

Appellant having failed to comply with rules 5, 6, 7, and 13 of this court relating to appeals, this appeal is deemed abandoned, and the judgment and order appealed from, are affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                    This  schedule   contains  summary   financial   information
                    extracted from the Balance  Sheet,  Statements of Operations
                    and  Statements  of  Cash  Flows,  and is  qualified  in its
                    entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000895464
<NAME>                        Magna-Lab Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                       1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.000
<CASH>                                           109,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 109,000
<PP&E>                                            16,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   793,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   125,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            830,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          20,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      (725,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     125,000
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    580,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (576,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (576,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (576,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.03)
        


</TABLE>
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Southern District of Florida

JOSEPH AMODIO

20-CV-61295-RKA

CAVALRY INVESTMENT, LLC, and

CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC

CAVALRY INVESTMENT, LLC

C T CORPORATION SYSTEM

1200 SOUTH PINE ISLAND ROAD

PLANTATION, FL 33324

The Law Offices of Jibrael S. Hindi, PLLC. 110 SE 6th St., Suite 1744, Fort 

Lauderdale, FL 33301. Phone: (844)542-7235 Email: tom@jibraellaw.com Fax: (855)

529-9540

 

07/01/2020 s/ Yesenia Rodriguez

Case 0:20-cv-61295-RKA Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2020 Page 1 of 1
### §2519. Conclusiveness of judgment

A final judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims against any plaintiff shall forever bar any further claim, suit, or demand against the United States arising out of the matters involved in the case or controversy.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 979; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §139(m), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 43; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §286 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §179, 36 Stat. 1141).

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "United States Claims Court" for "Court of Claims".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.
#### § 3271.10 What do I need to start preparing a site and building and testing a utilization facility on Federal land leased for geothermal resources?

In order to use Federal land to produce geothermal power, you must obtain a site license and construction permit from BLM before you start preparing the site. Send BLM a plan that shows what you want to do, and draft a proposed site license agreement that you think is fair and reasonable. We will review your proposal and decide whether to give you a permit and license to proceed with work on the site.
0-cr-06216-LSS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2000 Pa
0-cr-06216-LSS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2000 Pa
0-cr-06216-LSS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2000 Pa
0-cr-06216-LSS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2000 Pa
0-cr-06216-LSS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2000 Pa
0-cr-06216-LSS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2000 Pa
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Insightful Corporation for
the quarter ended September 30, 2007, I, Richard P. Barber, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Insightful Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) such Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Insightful Corporation.



/s/ RICHARD P. BARBERRichard P. BarberChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)


November 14, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          359898
<SECURITIES>                                  19446206
<RECEIVABLES>                                   347786
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 26548
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                20180438
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           344811
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    19835627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  20180438
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                191776
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 26561
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    165215
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-11046

Summary Calendar

 

LORENZO THOMAS,

also known as James H. Thompson,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JIM BOWLES, Etc; ET AL.,

Defendants,

DALLAS POLICE OFFICER CREAMER;

DALLAS POLICE OFFICE ZAMORA; 

DALLAS SHERIFF’S OFFICER NELSON,

Defendants-Appellants. 

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:92-CV-721-BC-G

- - - - - - - - - -

May 21, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jeffrey Creamer, Bradford Nelson, and Samuel Zamora appeal

the district court’s denial of their motion for a summary

judgment dismissing Thomas Lorenzo’s claims that they used

excessive force against him and that they failed to provide him

with adequate medical care after the second alleged incident of 
No. 98-11046

-2-

excessive use of force. Creamer, Nelson, and Zamora argue that

Thomas did not present sufficient summary judgment evidence to

establish that a genuine issue of material fact exists which

precludes the court from granting summary judgment. We have

interlocutory jurisdiction to determine whether Thomas’ summary

judgment facts state a claim under clearly established federal

law. See Behrens v. Pelletier, 116 S. Ct. 834, 842 (1996);

Nerren v. Livingston Police Dep’t, 86 F.3d 469, 472 (5th Cir.

1996). Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to Thomas,

we conclude that the district court did not err in holding that

Thomas’ allegations state a claim for excessive use of force

against Creamer and state a separate claim for excessive use of

force against Nelson and Zamora. See Rankin v. Klevenhagen, 5

F.3d 103, 107 (5th Cir. 1993). Thomas’ allegations also state a

claim against Nelson and Zamora for failure to provide adequate

medical care after the second alleged incident of excessive use

of force. See Reeves v. Collins, 27 F.3d 174, 176 (5th Cir.

1994).

AFFIRMED.
3 of 5: Coal PM Floor Spreadsheet 

 RobertJ Wayland 

 to: Cortney_Higgins 

 11/21/2011 03:49 PM 

 Cc: Bill Maxwell 

 

Coal_PM_Metal_Floor analysis_111811.xlsx
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.1313 When is the record closed?

The record will close when the time to file a response to an appeal petition expires pursuant to § 134.1310.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Noriyuki Kanayama, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Entertainment Is Us,
Inc. for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to us
by others, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions);

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

January 13, 2006



                     /s/ Noriyuki Kanayama
                     -------------------------------------
                     Noriyuki Kanayama
                     Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of the Construction of the Will of George G. Nole, Deceased. Joseph Nole, Individually and as Executor of George G. Nole, Deceased, Appellant; Sadie Nole, as Executrix of George G. Nole, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, J J.