alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:20-cv-22712-KMW Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 16 of 16
Margaret Doane

Margaret “Margie” Doane became the Executive Director for Operations in 

July 2018. This is the highest-ranking career position in the agency, with 

responsibilities for overseeing the agency’s operational and administrative 

functions, and serving as the chief operating officer. 

Doane previously served as the agency’s General Counsel from November 2012 

to June 2018. In that position, she oversaw the Office of General Counsel and 

directed matters of law and legal policy; provided legal opinions, advice, and 

assistance to the agency; monitored adjudicatory proceedings; provided legal

interpretations; and represented and protected the interests of the NRC in legal 

matters, among other responsibilities.

Prior to that position, Doane served for five years as the Director of the NRC’s Office of International 

Programs. She was the principal liaison between the international regulatory community and the 

members of the Commission as well as civilian nuclear policy-making bodies within the federal 

government involved in international activities. She also served for three years as the office’s Deputy 

Director. 

Doane began her career at the NRC in 1991 as a Special Assistant (Legal) in the Office of the Secretary. 

She later served for seven years as an attorney in the Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication 

before joining the office of Commissioner Jeffrey S. Merrifield, where she held progressively 

responsible positions before ultimately serving as his Chief of Staff. She is a 2004 graduate of the 

NRC’s SES Candidate Development Program. 

Doane received the NRC Meritorious Service Award in 2005 and the Presidential Meritorious Service 

Award in 2018.

Prior to joining the NRC, Doane was an attorney advisor for the Department of Veterans Affairs, Board 

of Veterans Appeals. Doane received a bachelor’s degree in Economics from Loyola College in 

Baltimore. She holds a law degree from the University of Maryland School of Law.

March 2019
Scott Moore

Executive Director, 

Advisory Committee 

on Reactor 

Safeguards

Director, Office of 

Commission 

Appellate 

Adjudication

Jared Heck 

(Acting)

Chief Administrative 

Judge (Chairman), 

Atomic Safety and 

Licensing Board Panel

E. Roy Hawkens Eugene Dacus

Director, Office of 

Congressional 

Affairs

Director, 

Office of Public 

Affairs

Holly Harrington

(Acting)

Executive 

Director for 

Operations

Raymond Furstenau

(Acting)

Chief 

Financial 

Officer

Jennifer Golder

(Acting)

Inspector

General

Robert J. Feitel David L. Skeen

Director, Office of 

International 

Programs

Secretary of 

the Commission

Carrie M. Safford

Vacant

Deputy Executive Director for Materials, Waste, 

Research, State, Tribal, Compliance, 

Administration and Human Capital Programs

Deputy Executive Director 

for Reactor and 

Preparedness Programs

Scott Morris

The Commission

Jody C. Martin 

(Acting)

Associate 

Director for 

Operations

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

April 17, 2024

Chief 

Information 

Officer

Scott C. Flanders

(Acting)

Brooke P. Clark

General

Counsel

Chief

Human Capital 

Officer

Director, 

Office of 

Administration

Director, 

Office of 

Investigations

Director, Office of 

Nuclear Material Safety

and Safeguards

Director, 

Office of 

Enforcement

Director, Office of 

Nuclear Regulatory 

Research

Director, Office of 

Nuclear Security and 

Incident Response

Mirela Gavrilas

Director, Office of 

Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation

Andrea D. Veil John Tappert

 (Acting)

David L. Pelton John Lubinski Thomas G. Ashley James C. Corbett

(Acting)

Eric Dilworth

(Acting)

Vonna Ordaz

Director, Office of 

Small Business 

and Civil Rights

Raymond K. Lorson

Regional 

Administrator 

Region I

Laura Dudes

Regional 

Administrator 

Region II

Jack Giessner

Regional 

Administrator 

Region III

John Monninger

Regional 

Administrator 

Region IV

Commissioner

David A. Wright

Commissioner Chair

Christopher T. Hanson 

Commissioner

Annie Caputo

Commissioner

Bradley R. Crowell Vacant
Wildlife Science 

in Yosemite: 

Wildlife Tracking 

There are many ways that 

wildlife biologists find out 

new information about the 

animals they study. One of 

them is by tracking wild 

animals. 

Biologists use tracking devices 

in the form of collars, tags, or 

tiny antennas to track wild 

animals. This gives biologists 

the ability to find out more 

information about where 

animals are moving, how 

large of an area they use, and 

what kind of habitat they use. 

Some tracking devices send 

GPS points directly to 

biologists, and tell them 

where tagged animals are 

moving every hour. Other 

devices store data and 

biologists have to retrieve the 

data later. Still other trackers 

don't collect GPS data, but 

instead, help biologists locate 

animals by putting out a radio 

signal (telemetry). This signal 

can be picked up using a radio 

receiver and an antenna, like 

in the picture here! 

Biologists make sure that 

tracking devices weigh less 

than 3% of an animal's body 

weight, and that they are 

made of smooth, safe 

materials, so that they do not 

harm wildlife. The 

information biologists collect 

by tracking wildlife helps 

better understand and 

protect many species within 

the park!
### §122b. General provisions

#### (a) Effect on Internet Tax Freedom Act

Nothing in this section may be construed to modify or supersede the operation of the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note).

#### (b) Inapplicability to service providers

Nothing in this section may be construed to—

(1) authorize any injunction against an interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(f) of title 47 1 used by another person to engage in any activity that is subject to this Act;

(2) authorize any injunction against an electronic communication service (as defined in section 2510(15) of title 18) used by another person to engage in any activity that is subject to this Act; or

(3) authorize an injunction prohibiting the advertising or marketing of any intoxicating liquor by any person in any case in which such advertising or marketing is lawful in the jurisdiction from which the importation, transportation or other conduct to which this Act applies originates.

(Mar. 1, 1913, ch. 90, § 3, as added Pub. L. 106–386, div. C, §2004(a), Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1548.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Internet Tax Freedom Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is title XI of Pub. L. 105–277, div. C, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–719, which is set out as a note under section 151 of Title 47, Telecommunications.

This Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is act Mar. 1, 1913, ch. 90, 37 Stat. 699, popularly known as the Webb-Kenyon Act, which is classified to this section and sections 122 and 122a of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Oct. 28, 2000, see section 2004(b) of Pub. L. 106–386, set out as a note under section 122a of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a closing parenthesis.
Case 1:20-cv-22746-AMC   Document 44   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020   Page 1 of 12

Case 1:20-cv-22746-AMC   Document 44   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020   Page 2 of 12

Case 1:20-cv-22746-AMC   Document 44   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020   Page 3 of 12

Case 1:20-cv-22746-AMC   Document 44   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020   Page 4 of 12

Case 1:20-cv-22746-AMC   Document 44   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020   Page 5 of 12

Case 1:20-cv-22746-AMC   Document 44   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020   Page 6 of 12

Case 1:20-cv-22746-AMC   Document 44   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020   Page 7 of 12

Case 1:20-cv-22746-AMC   Document 44   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020   Page 8 of 12

Case 1:20-cv-22746-AMC   Document 44   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020   Page 9 of 12

Case 1:20-cv-22746-AMC   Document 44   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020   Page 10 of 12

Case 1:20-cv-22746-AMC   Document 44   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020   Page 11 of 12

Case 1:20-cv-22746-AMC   Document 44   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020   Page 12 of 12
§ 688.550 How are the costs associated with real property treated in the YouthBuild program? ( a ) As provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the costs of the following activities associated with real property are allowable solely for the purpose of training YouthBuild participants: ( 1 ) Rehabilitation of existing structures for use by homeless individuals and families or low-income families or for use as transitional housing;
( 2 ) Construction of buildings for use by homeless individuals and families or low-income families or for use as transitional housing; and
( 3 ) Construction or rehabilitation of community or other public facilities, except, as provided in § 688.520(b), only 15 percent of the grant award is allowable for such construction and rehabilitation.
( b ) The costs for acquisition of buildings that are used for activities described in paragraph (a) of this section are allowable with prior grant officer approval and only under the following conditions: ( 1 ) The purchase cost of buildings used solely for training purposes is allowable; and
( 2 ) For buildings used for training and other purposes, the allowable amount is determined based on the proportionate share of the purchase cost related to direct training.
( c ) The following costs are allowable to the extent allocable to training YouthBuild participants in the construction and rehabilitation activities specified in paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) Trainees' tools and clothing including personal protective equipment (PPE);
( 2 ) On-site trainee supervisors;
( 3 ) Construction management;
( 4 ) Relocation of buildings; and
( 5 ) Clearance and demolition.
( d ) Architectural fees, or a proportionate share thereof, are allowable when such fees can be related to items such as architectural plans or blueprints on which participants will be trained.
( e ) The following costs are unallowable: ( 1 ) The costs of acquisition of land; and
( 2 ) Brokerage fees.
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.1301 What is the scope of the rules in this subpart? ( a ) The rules of practice in this subpart apply to all appeals to OHA from formal protest determinations made by the Director of SBA's Office of HUBZone (D/HUB) in connection with a HUBZone status protest. Appeals under this subpart include any of the grounds for a HUBZone status protest specified in § 126.801 of this chapter, as well as appeals from dismissals of HUBZone status protests by the D/HUB based on a finding that the protest was premature, untimely, nonspecific, not based upon protestable allegations, moot, or not filed by an interested party.
( b ) Except where inconsistent with this subpart, the provisions of subparts A and B of this part apply to appeals listed in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Appeals relating to formal size determinations and NAICS Code designations are governed by subpart C of this part.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5147 

To designate the Staten Island Unit of the Gateway National Recreation 

Area as the ‘‘Senator James L. Buckley Seashore’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 30 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 29), 2022 

Mr. SULLIVAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To designate the Staten Island Unit of the Gateway National 

Recreation Area as the ‘‘Senator James L. Buckley Seashore’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Senator James L. 

5 Buckley Seashore Designation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF SENATOR JAMES L. BUCKLEY 

7 SEASHORE. 

8 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Staten Island Unit of the 

9 Gateway National Recreation Area described in subsection 

10 (a)(4) of the first section of Public Law 92–592 (16 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5147 IS

1 U.S.C. 460cc) is designated as the ‘‘Senator James L. 

2 Buckley Seashore’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, record, or other paper of the United 

5 States to the unit of the Gateway National Recreation 

6 Area described in subsection (a) shall be considered to be 

7 a reference to the ‘‘Senator James L. Buckley Seashore’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### Dansker Realty & Securities Corp., Respondent, v. Cary L. Wellington, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion to vacate a warrant of attachment and to vacate an order for service by publication. *912Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lewis, P. J, Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [191 Mise. 1010.]
Case 4:20-cv-10073-JLK   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2020   Page 1 of 9

2

Case 4:20-cv-10073-JLK   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2020   Page 2 of 9

3

Case 4:20-cv-10073-JLK   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2020   Page 3 of 9

4

Case 4:20-cv-10073-JLK   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2020   Page 4 of 9

5

Case 4:20-cv-10073-JLK   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2020   Page 5 of 9

6

Case 4:20-cv-10073-JLK   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2020   Page 6 of 9

7

Case 4:20-cv-10073-JLK   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2020   Page 7 of 9

Case 4:20-cv-10073-JLK   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2020   Page 8 of 9

Case 4:20-cv-10073-JLK   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2020   Page 9 of 9

- Complaint.Phan-signed
Complaint.Phan-signed
- Complaint.Phan-signed

- J. Phan sig pgs
- Complaint.Phan-signed
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Thomas Stone
National Historic SiteMaryland
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2003 Page 1 of 1
#### § 108.585 Voluntary decrease in NMVC Company's Regulatory Capital.

You must obtain SBA's prior written approval to reduce your Regulatory Capital by more than two percent in any fiscal year. At all times, you must retain sufficient Regulatory Capital to meet the minimum capital requirements in the Act and § 108.210, and sufficient Leverageable Capital to avoid having excess Leverage in violation of section 355(d) of the Act.
EX-4.4





 Exhibit 4.4 

CERTIFICATE OF CORPORATE DOMESTICATION OF DRAGONEER GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES CORP. 

Pursuant to Section 388 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”) 

Dragoneer Growth Opportunities Corp., presently a Cayman Islands exempted company limited by shares (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY: 
 1.     The Company was first incorporated on July 3, 2020 under the laws of the Cayman Islands. 

2.     The name of the Company immediately prior to the filing of this Certificate of Corporate Domestication with the Secretary of State
of the State of Delaware in accordance with Section 388 of the DGCL was Dragoneer Growth Opportunities Corp. 
 3.     The name of
the Company as set forth in the Certificate of Incorporation being filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in accordance with Section 388(b) of the DGCL is “CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc.” 

4.     The jurisdiction that constituted the seat, siege social, or principal place of business or central administration of the Company,
or any other equivalent thereto under applicable law, immediately prior to the filing of this Certificate of Corporate Domestication in accordance with the provisions of Section 388 of the DGCL was the Cayman Islands. 

5.     The domestication has been approved in the manner provided for by the document, instrument, agreement or other writing, as the case
may be, governing the internal affairs of the Company and the conduct of its business or by applicable non-Delaware law, as appropriate. 

The corporate domestication of the Company shall be effective upon the filing of this Certificate of Corporate Domestication and the Certificate of
Incorporation in accordance with Section 388 of the DGCL and with the Secretary of State of Delaware. 
 [Signature
page follows] 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate to be executed by its duly
authorized officer on this [●] day of [●], 2021. 
  

			
		 	DRAGONEER GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES
		 	CORP., a Cayman Islands exempted company limited by shares


  

			
	             Name:
	 	Pat Robertson
	             Title:
	 	Chief Operating Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 0:20-cv-61253-AHS

DOUG LONGHINI, 

Plaintiff,

v.

PNS STORES, INC. d/b/a BIG LOTS,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff, DOUG LONGHINI, and Defendant, PNS STORES, INC. d/b/a BIG LOTS, hereby 

advise the Court that the parties have reached an agreement to settle the instant case pending execution 

of a Settlement Agreement. The Parties will file a Stipulation dismissing this Action with prejudice 

once the settlement agreement is executed, which they reasonably expect to do no later than 45 days 

from the date of this Notice. Accordingly, the Parties respectfully request that the Court vacate all 

currently set dates and deadlines.

Dated this 19th, day of August, 2020.

/s/ Anthony J. Perez

ANTHONY J. PEREZ

Florida Bar No.: 535451

GARCIA-MENOCAL & PEREZ, P.L.

4937 S.W. 74th Court, Unit #3

Miami, FL 33155

Telephone: (305) 553- 3464

Facsimile: (305)553-3031

Primary Email: ajperez@lawgmp.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Laurie A. Thompson 

LAURIE A. THOMPSON

Florida Bar No.: 908339

FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A.

515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 2100

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Telephone: (561) 802-9044

Facsimile: (561) 802-9976

Email: rllorens@shutts.com

Attorney for Defendant

Case 0:20-cv-61253-AHS Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/19/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court 

by using the CM/ECF system. I further certify a copy of the foregoing was sent by CM/ECF to 

all counsel of record, this 19th, day of August 2020.

Respectfully submitted,

 GARCIA-MENOCAL & PEREZ, P.L.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

4937 S.W. 74th Court, No. 3

Miami, FL 33155

Telephone: (305) 553-3464

Facsimile: (305) 553-3031

Primary E-Mail: ajperez@gmplaw.com

 Secondary E-Mails: aquezada@lawgmp.com;

crodriguez@lawgmp.com

By: /s/ Anthony J. Perez____ 

 ANTHONY J. PEREZ

 Florida Bar No.: 535451

 

Case 0:20-cv-61253-AHS Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/19/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### Katherine F. Lindemann, as Executrix, etc., Respondent, v. Helena H. Richter, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opin*905ion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 11.71 Claimants. ( a ) A claim pursuant to this subpart may only be made by: ( 1 ) An employee of FEMA;
( 2 ) a former employee of FEMA whose claim arises out of an incident occurring before his/her separation from FEMA;
( 3 ) survivors of a person named in paragraph (a) (1) or (2) of this section, in the following order of precedence: ( i ) Spouse;
( ii ) children;
( iii ) father or mother, or both or
( iv ) brothers or sisters, or both;
( 4 ) the authorized agent or legal representative of a person named in paragraphs (a) (1), (2), and (3) of this section.
( b ) A claim may not be presented by or for the benefit of a subrogee, assignee, conditional vendor, or other third party.
### §459. Administration of oaths and acknowledgments

Each justice or judge of the United States may administer oaths and affirmations and take acknowledgments.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 908.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§264, 385, section 1509 of title 19, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Customs Duties, and section 1114(a) of title 26, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Internal Revenue Code (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§158, 268, 36 Stat. 1139, 1163; June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §509, 46 Stat. 733; Feb. 10, 1939, ch. 2, §1114(a), 53 Stat. 160; Oct. 21, 1942, ch. 619, title V, §504(a), (c), 56 Stat. 957; Feb. 25, 1944, ch. 63, title V, §503, 58 Stat. 72).

Section consolidates provisions of sections 264 and 385 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., section 1509 of title 19, U.S.C., 1940 ed., and section 1114(a) of title 26, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to administration of oaths and acknowledgments by judges and courts.

The provision of section 385 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., giving to "all courts of the United States" power to impose and administer all necessary oaths is the only part of such section in this title. The remainder is incorporated in section 401 of revised title 18, U.S.C. (H.R. 1600, 80th Cong.), Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

Section 264 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., related only to the Court of Claims and provision of such section relating to clerks and deputies is incorporated in section 953 of this title.

Section 1509 of title 19, U.S.C., 1940 ed., related only to the Customs Court.

Section 1114(a) of title 26, U.S.C., 1940 ed., related only to The Tax Court. That portion of such section authorizing certain employees of The Tax Court to administer oaths and acknowledgments is incorporated in section 953 of this title. For distribution of other provisions thereof, see Distribution Table.

The revised section clarifies what was apparently a statutory omission in that no provision was made with reference to the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, the judges of which now will have the same power respecting administering oaths as judges of other courts.

#### Senate Revision Amendment

By Senate amendment, all provisions relating to the Tax Court were eliminated, therefore, as finally enacted, section 1114(a) of Title 26, U.S.C., Internal Revenue Code, did not constitute part of the source of this section. However, no change in the text of this section was necessary. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.
#### § 4710.1 Land use planning.

Management activities affecting wild horses and burros, including the establishment of herd management areas, shall be in accordance with approved land use plans prepared pursuant to part 1600 of this title.