alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating  Partners  1992-C  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         432,871
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  479,225
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               934,896
<PP&E>                                         12,902,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (10,431,736)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,760,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          175,395
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,163,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,760,643
<SALES>                                        849,212
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               880,135
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  738,619<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,950)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,950)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>

        

</TABLE>
```

                                                                                          EXHIBIT 32

                        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Advanced  Lumitech,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended March 31, 2005,  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report'), I, Patrick Planche,  President,  Chief Executive Officer,  Treasurer and
Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
         financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Patrick Planche
---------------------------------------
Patrick Planche, President,
Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
August 16, 2005

                                                 E-2
```

----
January 19, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DELTRIC C. CALDWELL, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00082-CR V.

NO. 14-11-00083-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The 

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED, and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.
### §2409. Partition actions involving United States

Any civil action by any tenant in common or joint tenant owning an undivided interest in lands, where the United States is one of such tenants in common or joint tenants, against the United States alone or against the United States and any other of such owners, shall proceed, and be determined, in the same manner as would a similar action between private persons.

Whenever in such action the court orders a sale of the property or any part thereof the Attorney General may bid for the same in behalf of the United States. If the United States is the purchaser, the amount of the purchase money shall be paid from the Treasury upon a warrant drawn by the Secretary of the Treasury on the requisition of the Attorney General.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 972.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §766 (May 17, 1898, ch. 339, §§1, 2, 30 Stat. 416).

Provisions relating to service or commencement of the action and duty of United States attorneys to appear, defend, and file answer were omitted as surplusage and covered by Rules 2, 3, and 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and section 507 of this title.

Words "shall proceed, and be determined, in the same manner as would a similar action between private persons" were substituted for "shall proceed as other cases for partition by courts of equity, and in making such partition the court shall be governed by the same principles of equity that control courts of equity, in partition proceedings between private persons," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Changes were made in phraseology.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 16, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00864

- CV

In the Estate of Mari a G. Stoll, Deceased, In the Estate of Richard M. Stoll, Deceased

,

From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PC

- 3675 Honorable Veronica Vasquez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The parties have filed a joint motion to expedite this court’s mandate in th is appeal . The motion is GRANTED, and the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to issue this court’s mandate in this appeal contemporaneously with the issuance of this order. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 18.1(c).

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of January, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1: CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

            In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of Magna-Lab, Inc. for the quarter and six months ended August 31, 2003, the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

            (1)   such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter and six
                  months ended August 31, 2003 fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
                  10-QSB for the quarter and six months ended August 31, 2003
                  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                  condition and results of operations of Magna-Lab, Inc.


      October 13, 2003                            /s/ John R. Geisel
                                                  ------------------
                                                  Name: John Geisel
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer


                                       17
#### § 147.115 Does this part affect the Federal contracts that I receive?

It will affect future contract awards indirectly if you are debarred or suspended for a violation of the requirements of this part, as described in § 147.510(c). However, this part does not apply directly to procurement contracts. The portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 that applies to Federal procurement contracts is carried out through the Federal Acquisition Regulation in chapter 1 of Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations (the drug-free workplace coverage currently is in 48 CFR part 23, subpart 23.5).
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateResearch

# ACRS Meetings

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 08, 2020
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of New Energy Systems Group, (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K/A for year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Nian Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 22, 2011





/s/ Nian ChenNian Chen

Chief Executive Officer
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5004 

To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to provide relief to nonbanks 

from certain stress test requirements under that Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to provide 

relief to nonbanks from certain stress test requirements 

under that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alleviating Stress Test 

5 Burdens to Help Investors Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STRESS TEST RELIEF FOR NONBANKS. 

7 Section 165(i)(2) of the Financial Stability Act of 

8 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5365(i)(2)) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5004 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), in the second sen2 tence, by striking ‘‘are regulated by a primary Fed3 eral financial regulatory agency’’ and inserting the 

4 following: ‘‘the primary financial regulatory agency 

5 with respect to which is a Federal banking agency 

6 or the Federal Housing Finance Agency’’; 

7 (2) in subparagraph (C), in the matter pre8 ceding clause (i), by striking ‘‘Each Federal primary 

9 financial regulatory agency’’ and inserting ‘‘Each 

10 Federal banking agency and the Federal Housing 

11 Finance Agency’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(D) SEC AND CFTC.—The Securities and 

14 Exchange Commission and the Commodity Fu15 tures Trading Commission may each issue regu16 lations requiring financial companies with re17 spect to which the applicable agency is the pri18 mary financial regulatory agency to conduct 

19 periodic analyses of the financial condition, in20 cluding available liquidity, of those companies 

21 under adverse economic conditions.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Hanny Aponte, Plaintiff,

v.

American Sales Management 

Organization Corp. and Francisco 

Javier Agustin Rabell Torello, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-22617-Civ-Scola

Order on Motion to Dismiss

Now before the Court is the Defendants’ partial motion to dismiss the 

Plaintiff’s claim for unpaid minimum wages. For the reasons set forth below, the 

Court grants the Defendants’ motion (ECF No. 13).

The Plaintiff Hanny Aponte filed suit against her employers to recover 

unpaid overtime wages. Specifically, Aponte claims that the Defendants

deducted two hours each week for lunch breaks even though the Defendants 

required Aponte to work during her lunch break. (Complaint, ECF No. 1-2 at 4.)

The first count of the complaint for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act 

(“FLSA”) against American Sales Management Organization states that American 

Sales “knew and/or showed reckless disregard of the provisions of the FLSA 

concerning the payment of minimum and/or overtime wages as required by the 

FLSA.” (Id. at 5.) The Defendants now move to dismiss the minimum wage claim 

because Aponte has not alleged any facts to support that claim. The Court 

agrees.

In her response to the motion to dismiss, Aponte states that “it is Plaintiff’s 

present belief and allegation that all of her unpaid hours were overtime hours.”

(ECF No. 16 at ¶ 4.) She further states that “the ‘and/or’ language in Count I is 

intended to place Defendants on notice that, if, for example, further discovery 

demonstrates that any unpaid hours would not be properly classified as overtime 

hours, said hours would still be a part of Plaintiff’s claim and may qualify as 

unpaid minimum wages. (Id. at ¶ 5.) This is improper. See Goldin v. Boce Group, 

L.C., 773 F. Supp. 2d 1376, 1381 (S.D. Fla. 2011) (King, J.) (“Discovery is 

authorized solely for parties to develop the facts in a lawsuit in which a plaintiff

has stated a legally cognizable claim, not in order to permit a plaintiff to find out 

whether he has such a claim.”). And, the allegations do not meet the standard 

set forth in Twombly and Iqbal. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 

(2007) (Although a pleading need only contain a short and plain statement of the 

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2020 Page 1 of 2
claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, a plaintiff must nevertheless 

articulate “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.”); 

see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009).

In sum, the Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Plaintiff’s claim for unpaid 

minimum wage (ECF No. 13) is granted. The Plaintiff’s claims for unpaid 

overtime wages may proceed.

Done and ordered at Miami, Florida, on August 7, 2020.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-22617-RNS Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2020 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Argosy Gaming Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Richard J. Glasier, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Richard J. Glasier                |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
| Richard J. Glasier                    |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| May 6, 2005                      |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY ANDFURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

 

----
Exhibit
32(a)





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, OF THE


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rocky Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mike
Brooks, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Mike BrooksMike
      Brooks, Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerMay
      3, 2010
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Visit Hartwell Tavern

Minute Man National Historical Park
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateEnforcementIssued Significant Enforcement Actions

# 2020 Non-Licensee Actions

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

NAC International (EA-20-066)                                      

On December 21, 2020, the NRC issued a Notice of Violation to NAC International (Certificate Holder) for a Severity Level III and a Severity Level IV violation.  NAC failed to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 72.48(c)(2)(viii), “Changes, tests, and experiments,” and 10 CFR 72.146(c), “Design control.”  The violations involved a design change for NAC’s MAGNASTOR dry cask storage system.  The certificate holder failed to utilize a methodology as specified in the MAGNASTOR Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR); and, failed to obtain an amendment to use a different methodology.  In response, NAC re-performed the spent fuel cask tip-over analysis using the appropriate methodology and obtained satisfactory results.  NAC also implemented corrective actions to enhance its design control and 72.48 screening processes.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, January 20, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024 Reactor Actions
          - 2023 Reactor Actions
          - 2022 Reactor Actions
          - 2021 Reactor Actions
          - 2020 Reactor Actions
          - 2024 Materials Actions
          - 2023 Materials Actions
          - 2022 Materials Actions
          - 2021 Materials Actions
          - 2020 Materials Actions
          - 2024 Individual Actions
          - 2023 Individual Actions
          - 2022 Individual Actions
          - 2021 Individual Actions
          - 2020 Individual Actions
          - 2020 Non-Licensee Actions
          - 2019 Non-Licensee Actions
          - 2016 Non-Licensee Actions
          - 2015 Non-Licensee Actions
          - 2014 Non-Licensee Actions
          - 2023 Fuel Cycle Facilities
          - 2019 Fuel Cycle Facilities
          - 2018 Fuel Cycle Facilities
          - 2017 Fuel Cycle Facilities
          - 2016 Fuel Cycle Facilities

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, January 20, 2021
Women’s Rights

National Historical Park

JUNIOR RANGER ACTIVITY BOOK 

JUNIOR RANGER

This certificate certifies that

has completed the requirements to become a Junior Ranger.

Certificate of Completion Women’s Rights 

National Historical Park

Park Ranger Signature
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStrong associated C 4 absorption in low redshift quasarsIUE spectra of quasars were used to determine the frequency of occurrence of strong associated C 4 absorption systems at low red shifts. Four systems are found with rest frame equivalent width (REW) greater than 5 angstroms in the spectra of 38 quasars. This rate of occurrence of 0.12 is not significantly different from the rate of 0.064 determined for high red shift quasars. The detected strong associated systems are all in low red shift quasars which have been imaged from the ground. One of the quasars is unusual, having two nuclei, a close companion and distorted isotopes. Two of the others also have close companion galaxies at projected distances of under 100 kpc. The conclusion was made that a much larger sample is needed.Document ID19900019153Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsTytler, David*(Columbia Univ. New York, NY, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 5, 1990Subject CategoryAstronomyReport/Patent NumberCAL-1828NAS 1.26:186936NASA-CR-186936Accession Number90N28469Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-1240Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900019153.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 32.1: CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
     as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      In connection with the accompanying Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Magna-Lab, Inc. for the quarter ended May 31, 2008, the undersigned hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

      (1)   such Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31,
            2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
            of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in such Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
            the quarter ended May 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
            Magna-Lab, Inc.


      July 3, 2008                /s/ Lawrence A. Minkoff
                                  -----------------------
                                  Name: Lawrence A. Minkoff
                                  Title: President (principal executive officer)