alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND VI, L.P.



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund VI, L.P. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Principal Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Principal Financial Officer of the corporate general
partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/     LEO F. WELLS, III  
|Leo F. Wells, III          
|Principal Executive Officer
|November 13, 2006          
|                           
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS 
|Douglas P. Williams        
|Principal Financial Officer
|November 13, 2006
### §1932.1 Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

The Judicial Conference of the United States shall prescribe from time to time the fees and costs to be charged and collected by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

(Added Pub. L. 104–317, title IV, §403(a)(1), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3854.)

1 Another section 1932 is set out after this section.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, David B. Kaysen, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Diametrics
Medical, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: June 13, 2005 /s/ David B. KaysenSignatureName: David B. Kaysen
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
### §1260. Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands; certiorari

Final judgments or decrees rendered by the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands may be reviewed by the Supreme Court by writ of certiorari where the validity of a treaty or statute of the United States is drawn in question or where the validity of a statute of the Virgin Islands is drawn in question on the ground of its being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, or where any title, right, privilege, or immunity is specially set up or claimed under the Constitution or the treaties or statutes of, or any commission held or authority exercised under, the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 112–226, §2(a), Dec. 28, 2012, 126 Stat. 1606.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 112–226, §3, Dec. 28, 2012, 126 Stat. 1607, provided that: "The amendments made by this Act [enacting this section and amending section 1613 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions] apply to cases commenced on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 28, 2012]."
RIV: 97-10 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson February 14, 1997

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

E-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC FINES UNITED NUCLEAR $100,000 FOR FAILING TO SET ASIDE FUNDS

FOR DECOMMISSIONING CHURCH ROCK URANIUM MILL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a fine of $100,000

against United Nuclear Corporation, of Gallup, New Mexico, for failing to properly

comply with a January 1992 order to set aside $16.4 million needed to

decommission and decontaminate the Church Rock uranium mill site near Gallup.

The NRC conducted investigations into United Nuclear's financial affairs

beginning in 1992 and continuing through 1996 in order to track funds received in

the 1992 settlement of a company law suit against the U.S. Government. The

proceeds of the settlement were $67.5 million. The NRC order required that $16.4

million from the settlement be held by United Nuclear in a special account that

could only be tapped with NRC approval for use in the cleanup work at Church

Rock.

The NRC's investigation determined that United Nuclear willfully violated

this order by transferring the entire $67.5 million to its corporate parent, UNC, Inc.

in Annapolis, Maryland, the day after the settlement was received. In addition,

investigators found that an officer of United Nuclear and UNC, Inc., intentionally

provided false information to the NRC by stating that the required $16.4 million

was in a bank account owned and controlled by United Nuclear.

In fact, the investigation determined, the money was in an investment

account that was owned solely by UNC, Inc., and United Nuclear had no control

over the funds. After questions were raised by the NRC, the officer had the

investment firm add a designation to the name of the account stating that it was

"For the Benefit Of United Nuclear," however this had no legal effect on ownership

of the account.

-MoreLater in 1992, UNC, Inc., provided the NRC with legal assurance that the

$16.4 million would be available for the Church Rock cleanup work. That cleanup

effort is now underway.

In a letter to United Nuclear, NRC Region IV Administrator L. Joe Callan,

said, "Willful violation of an NRC order and the willful submission of incomplete

and inaccurate information by a senior licensee official are considered very

significant violations." As a result, the NRC has exercised its enforcement

authority to propose a penalty of $100,000.

United Nuclear Corporation must respond to the Notice of Violation in

writing within 30 days. The response must document specific actions taken to

prevent recurrence of the violations. During this time the company may pay the

fine or file a protest.
-30-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 0:20-cv-61241-RUIZ

APRIL HICKS,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S

NOTICE OF FILING CORRECTED EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant, United States of America, by and through its undersigned Assistant United 

States Attorney, hereby gives notice of the filing corrected Exhibits A and B as pages relating to 

certification and swearing of the witness were omitted from the versions of the two deposition 

transcripts filed on August 24, 2021 [D.E. 37-1; and D.E. 37-2] in support of the United States’

Motion for Summary Judgment [D.E. 34] and as referenced in the Defendant’s Statement of 

Undisputed Material Facts [D.E. 35].

Case 0:20-cv-61241-RAR Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

Dated: September 2, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ 

ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 

By: Monica L. Haddad

Monica L. Haddad 

Assistant United States Attorney

Florida Bar No. 99426

Email: Monica.Haddad@usdoj.gov

U.S. Attorney’s Office

Southern District of Florida

500 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Telephone: (561) 209-1004

Counsel for Defendant, United States of America

Case 0:20-cv-61241-RAR Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2021 Page 2 of 2
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2009      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       |                               |                                                            |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | PAPERWEIGHT      DEVELOPMENT CORP. |
|                       |                               |                                                            |
| Dated:      March 27, 2009 |                               | /s/      Mark R. Richards                                       |
|                       | Name:                              |   Mark      R. Richards                               |
|                       | Title:                             |   Chairman,      President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
Opinion issued April 18, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00836-CV

———————————

DAIQUIRI HILL, Appellant

V.

SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY DBA AT&T TEXAS, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 269th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2017-42352

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Daiquiri Hill, has neither paid the required fees nor established 

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.

GOV’T CODE §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041; Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in 

Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District 
2

Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has 

not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See

TEX.R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, 

appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and 

for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Landau.
Exhibit 4.23


 


DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED


 


As of December 31, 2020, MICT,
Inc. (“we,” “our,” “us” or the “Company”) had one (1) class of securities registered under
Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), its Common Stock, par value, $0.001 per
share.


 


Pursuant
to our certificate of incorporation, as amended, our authorized capital stock consists of 250,000,000 shares of common stock and
10,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock, $0.001 par value. The
following description summarizes the material terms of our capital stock and does not purport to be complete. It is subject to,
and qualified in its entirety by reference to, our certificate of incorporation, as amended and our amended and restated bylaws, each
of which is incorporated by reference as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (the “Report”)
of which this Exhibit 4.23 is a part.


 


Defined terms used herein
but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Report.


 


Common Stock 


 


Voting. Each holder
of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share on all matters to be voted upon by the holders of common stock.


 


Dividends. Subject
to preferences that may be applicable to any then outstanding preferred stock, and further subject to any contractual limitations on the
declaration, setting aside or payment of dividends, holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably those dividends, if any, as
may be declared from time to time by our board of directors out of legally available funds.


 


Liquidation. In the
event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of common stock will be entitled to share ratably in the net assets legally
available for distribution to stockholders after the payment of all of our debts and other liabilities and the satisfaction of any liquidation
preferences that may be granted to the holders of any then outstanding shares of preferred stock.


 


Rights and Preferences.
The common stock has no preemptive, conversion or other subscription rights, and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable
to the common stock. The rights, preferences and privileges of the holders of common stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected
by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred stock, which we may designate and issue in the future.
No. 13,172.

#### Mills, Administrator *v.*Hammer.

(16 P. [2d] 1120)

Decided November 21, 1932.

Judgment affirmed en banc on application for supersedeas without written opinion.

*543Mr. John M. Boyle, Mr. A. C. R. Swenson, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. R. L. Chambers, for defendant in error.
EXHIBIT 32.2: CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
     as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      In connection with the accompanying Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Magna-Lab, Inc. for the quarter ended May 31, 2008, the undersigned hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

      (1)   such Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31,
            2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
            of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in such Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
            the quarter ended May 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
            Magna-Lab, Inc.


      July 3, 2008    /s/ Kenneth C. Riscica
                      ----------------------
                      Name: Kenneth C. Riscica
                      Title: Treasurer & Secretary (principal financial officer)
Filing # 113948395 E-Filed 09/24/2020 10:09:15 PM Case 1:20-cv-22044-JEM Document 61-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2020 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:20-cv-22044-JEM Document 61-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2020 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:20-cv-22044-JEM Document 61-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2020 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:20-cv-22044-JEM Document 61-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2020 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:20-cv-22044-JEM Document 61-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2020 Page 5 of 5
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2013-0327

 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM161AD

737-53A1200, R1 --- 7/7/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-016

January 27, 2000

NRC ISSUES DRAFT REVIEW PLAN

FOR MIXED OXIDE FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued for public comment a draft plan for the review

of a possible future application for a mixed oxide (MOX) fuel fabrication facility.

The Department of Energy has announced that it plans to construct a MOX fuel plant at its

Savannah River site in South Carolina through a contract with the consortium of Duke Engineering &

Services, COGEMA Inc., and Stone & Webster (known as DCS). DCS would construct and operate a

MOX facility that would convert surplus weapons-grade plutonium provided by the Department of

Energy into fuel to power commercial nuclear reactors. Commercial nuclear power plants in the

United States currently use uranium as fuel; the mixed oxide fuel would be a combination of uranium

and plutonium.

Under NRC regulations, potential operators of commercial plutonium facilities, such as a MOX

fuel fabrication plant, must obtain NRC's approval prior to initiating construction, and the NRC must

later confirm that the facility has been constructed in accordance with the license application. DCS has

not yet submitted an application to the NRC for such a facility.

The Standard Review Plan defines standards and criteria that the NRC staff would use in

reviewing an application to decide if there is reasonable assurance that a MOX fuel fabrication facility

will be constructed and operated in a manner that will provide reasonable protection of the health and

safety of workers and the public and the environment and that will not be inimical to the common

defense and security.

A copy of the draft "Standard Review Plan for the Review of an Application for a Mixed Oxide

(MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility" (NUREG-1718) is available by writing to the U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Distribution Services, Washington, DC 20555-0001. A copy is also available

on the NRC's website at http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/NUREGS/SR1718/index.html.

Comments should be submitted by March 13 to the Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001. Comments may also be submitted

electronically by selecting the "comments" link on the above website.
##
```

[109th Congress Public Law 23]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ023.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 366]]

Public Law 109-23
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
8200 South Vermont Avenue in Los Angeles, California, as the ``Sergeant 
   First Class John Marshall Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 12, 
                          2005 -  [H.R. 289]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 8200 
South Vermont Avenue in Los Angeles, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant First Class John Marshall Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant First Class John 
Marshall Post Office Building''.

    Approved July 12, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 289:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Feb. 1, considered and passed House.
            June 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
### §584. Official stations

The Attorney General may determine the official stations of the United States trustees and assistant United States trustees within the regions for which they were appointed.

(Added Pub. L. 95–598, title II, §224(a), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2663; amended Pub. L. 99–554, title I, §144(d), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3096.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 408(c) of Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, which provided for the repeal of this section and the deletion of any references to United States Trustees in this title at a prospective date, was repealed by section 307(b) of Pub. L. 99–554. See note set out preceding section 581 of this title.

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–554 substituted "regions" for "districts".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–554 effective 30 days after Oct. 27, 1986, see section 302(a) of Pub. L. 99–554, set out as a note under section 581 of this title.